📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 不列顛的毀滅

不列顛的毀滅 第 5 章 第 1/4 段

拉丁文原文.38 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 5:1–5:38(全章共 115 節)

← 第 4 章
下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
5:1
CAPUT PRIMUM. Increpatio in clerum.— Sacerdotes I habet Britannia, sed insipientes; quamplurimos ministros, sed imprudentes; clericos, sed raptores subdolos; pastores, ut dicuntur, sed occisioni animarum lupos paratos; quippe non commoda plebi providentes, sed proprii plenitudinem ventris quærentes: ecclesiæ domus habentes, sed turpis lucri gratia eas adeuntes; populos docentes, sed præbendo pessima exempla, vitia malosque mores; raro sacrificantes, et nunquam puro cordc inter altaria stantes; plebem ob peccata non corripientes, nimirum eadem agentes; praecepta Christi spernentes, et suas libidines modis omnibus implere curantes;
第一章 責備聖品階級。——不列顛有祭司,卻是愚昧的;有許多執事,卻是不謹慎的;有神職人員,卻是狡詐的掠奪者;有所謂的牧人,卻是預備好屠殺靈魂的豺狼——因為他們不為民眾預備有益之物,反尋求填滿自己的肚腹;他們佔有教會的房屋,卻為了污穢之財而進入;他們教導百姓,卻以最壞的榜樣教導——即各樣的惡行與敗壞的品行;他們極少獻祭,從不以清潔的心站在祭壇之間;他們不為百姓的罪責備他們,因為他們自己也行同樣的事;他們藐視基督的命令,卻千方百計地放縱自己的私慾;
CHAPTER ONE. A rebuke against the clergy.—Britain has priests, but they are foolish; very many ministers, but imprudent; clergy, but crafty plunderers; pastors, so called, but wolves ready for the slaughter of souls—for they provide not the things profitable to the people, but seek the filling of their own belly; men who possess the houses of the church, but frequent them for the sake of filthy lucre; who teach the people, but by giving the worst examples—vices and evil manners; who seldom sacrifice, and never stand among the altars with a pure heart; who do not reprove the people for their sins, since they themselves do the same; who despise the precepts of Christ, and take care to fulfil their own lusts by every means;
5:2
sedem Petri apostoli immundis pedibus usurpantes, sed merito cupiditatis in Judæ rraditoris pestilentem cathedram decidentes; veritatem pro inimico odientes, et mendaciis ac si charissimis fratribus faventes; justos inopes immanes quasi angues torvis vultibus conspicantes, et sceleratos divites absque ullo verecundiæ respectu sicut coelestes angelos venerantes; egenis eleemosynam esse dandam sammis e labiis prædicantes, sed ipsi vel obolum non dantes; nefanda populi scelera tacentes, et suas injurias quasi Christo irrogatas amplificantes;
他們以污穢的腳僭奪使徒彼得的座位,卻因其貪婪的應得,落入賣主之猶大那瘟疫的座位;他們恨惡真理如仇敵,卻寵愛謊言如同至親的弟兄;他們以猙獰的面目看待公義與貧乏之人,凶惡如蛇,卻毫無羞恥之念地尊崇邪惡的富人,彷彿是天上的使者;他們只用嘴唇的尖端宣講當把賙濟施給窮人,自己卻連一文錢也不施捨;他們對百姓可憎的罪行緘默不言,卻把自己所受的損害誇大,彷彿是加害於基督;
who usurp the seat of the apostle Peter with unclean feet, but by the merit of their covetousness fall into the pestilent chair of Judas the betrayer; who hate the truth as an enemy, and favour lies as if they were dearest brothers; who look upon the just and needy as savage as serpents, with grim faces, and venerate wicked rich men without any regard for shame, as if they were heavenly angels; who proclaim with the tips of their lips that alms should be given to the poor, yet themselves give not so much as a farthing; who keep silent about the abominable crimes of the people, but magnify their own injuries as if they had been done to Christ;
5:3
religiosam forte matrem seu sorores domo pellentes, et externas veluti secretiori ministerio familiares indecenter levantes, vel potius ( ut vera dicam, licet inepta non tam mihi quam talia agentibus) humiliantes; ecclesiasticos post hæc gradus propensius quam regna coelorum ambientes, et tyrannico ritu acceptos defendentes, nec tamen legitimis moribus illustrantes; ad præcepta sanctorum (si aliquando duntaxat audierint quae ab illis saepissime audienda erant) oscitantes ac stupidos, et ad ludicra et ineptas sxcularium hominum fabulas, ac si iter vise quæ mortis pandunt, strenuos et intentos; pinguedinis gratia taurorum more raucos, et ad illicita infeliciter promptos;
他們或許把虔誠的母親或姊妹趕出家門,卻不合宜地高抬陌生的婦女,彷彿是在某種更隱密職事上的親近之人,或更確切地說(說實話,雖然這事不雅,與其說是對我不雅,不如說是對行這事之人不雅)乃是羞辱她們;他們在此之後追逐教會的職位,比追求天國還要熱切,並以暴君的方式維護所領受的,卻不以合法的行為為之增光;他們對聖徒的教訓(倘若他們曾何時聽過那些本應從聖徒口中常常聽見的話)打哈欠且呆鈍,卻對世俗之人輕浮愚妄的虛談,彷彿是死亡之路所敞開的途徑,倒精神抖擻、專心致志;他們因肥胖而像公牛般聲音嘶啞,可悲地對不法之事躍躍欲試;
who perhaps drive a devout mother or sisters from the house, and unbecomingly exalt strange women as if intimate in some more secret ministry, or rather (to speak the truth, though it is unseemly not so much to me as to those who do such things) humiliate them; who after this court ecclesiastical ranks more eagerly than the kingdoms of heaven, and defend in tyrannical fashion what they have received, yet do not adorn it with lawful conduct; who at the precepts of the saints (if indeed they have at any time heard what they ought most often to have heard from them) are yawning and stupid, but at the trifling and foolish fables of worldly men, as if these were the path which the ways of death lay open, are vigorous and intent; hoarse like bulls from their fatness, and unhappily prompt to unlawful things;
5:4
vultus arroganter in altum habentes, et sensus conscientia remordente ad ima vel tartarum demersos: uno sane perdito denario moestos, et ad unum inquisitum lætos: in apostolicis sanctionibus ob inscitiam vel peccatorum pondus (ora etiam scientium obturantes) hebetes ac mutos, et in flexibus mundialium negotiorum mendacibus doctissimos:
他們傲慢地把臉高高揚起,他們的心思卻被良心啃噬,沉淪到深淵甚至陰間;為丟失一個錢幣便真切地哀傷,為尋得一個錢幣便歡喜;在使徒的規條上,因著無知或罪的重擔(甚至堵住那些有知識者的口),又遲鈍又啞口無言,在世俗事務虛謊的詭詐曲折上卻極其博學;
holding their faces arrogantly aloft, while their senses, gnawed by conscience, are plunged into the depths or even into hell; truly mournful over a single lost penny, yet glad over a single penny gained; in the apostolic ordinances, through ignorance or the weight of their sins (and even stopping the mouths of those who know), dull and dumb, yet most learned in the lying twists of worldly affairs;
5:5
quorum de scelerata conversatione multos sacerdotio irruentes, potius vel illud pene omni pecunia redimentes, quam tractos, et in eodem veteri infaustoque intolerabilium piaculorum cœno post sacerdotalem episcopatus vel presbyterii sedem ( qui nec itidem usquam sederunt) ut pole indigne porcorum more volutantes, rapto tantum sacerdotali nomine, nec tamen tenore vel apostolica dignitate accepta;
他們當中許多人,因其邪惡的生活方式,硬闖入祭司之職,或更確切地說,幾乎不惜任何代價買得此職,而非被牽引就任;在那同一陳舊不祥、罪孽難堪的污泥中,在主教或長老的祭司座位之後(那座位他們也從未真正坐過),既然顯然不配,便像豬一般在其中打滾,只攫取了祭司的名分,卻未領受其實質或使徒的尊嚴;
and many of these, on account of their wicked manner of life, rush into the priesthood, or rather buy it at almost any price, instead of being drawn to it; and in that same old and ill-omened mire of intolerable sins, after the priestly seat of bishopric or presbytery (on which they have likewise nowhere sat), being plainly unworthy, they wallow like swine, having seized only the priestly name, yet not having received its tenor or apostolic dignity;
5:6
sed qui nondum ad integram fidem sunt vel malorum pœnitentia idonci, quomodo ad quemlibet ecclesiasticum (ut non dicam summum) convenientes, et adepii gradum quem nonnisi sancti atque perfecti et apostolorum imitatores, et ( ut magistri gentium verbis loquar) irreprehensibiles legitime et absque magno sacrilegii crimine suscipiunt? CAP. II. De eadem re. — Quid enim tam impium tamque scelestum est, quam ad similitudinem Simonis Magi (Ad. VIII, 48), non intervenientibus licet interea promiscuis criminibus, episcopatus officium presbyterii terreno, pretio, quod sanctitate rectisque moribus decentius acquiritur, quempiam velle mercari ?
但那些尚未在純全的信德上、或在為其惡行悔改上夠資格的人——他們怎能來到任何教會職分(不消說最高的職分),既得了那唯有聖潔、純全、效法使徒之人,並(用萬民教師的話說)無可指責的人,才可合法且無褻瀆大罪地領受的職位呢?第二章 論同一事。——還有甚麼比照行邪術西門的樣式(使徒行傳八18)——縱然其間並無雜亂的罪行介入——竟有人甘願以屬地的價銀購買主教或長老之職,更不虔不法的呢?這職分本應藉聖潔正直的品行更合宜地取得。
but they who are not yet fit, either as to perfect faith or as to repentance for their evils—how is it that they come to any ecclesiastical office (not to say the highest), and, having obtained a rank which only the holy and perfect and imitators of the apostles, and (to speak in the words of the teacher of the nations) the irreproachable, may lawfully receive without grave crime of sacrilege? CHAPTER TWO. On the same matter.—For what is so impious and so wicked as that anyone, after the likeness of Simon Magus (Acts 8:18)—though no promiscuous crimes meanwhile intervene—should wish to purchase for an earthly price the office of bishopric or presbytery, which is more becomingly acquired by holiness and upright manners?
5:7
Sed in eo isti propensius vel desperatius errant, quo non ab apostolis vel apostolorum successoribus, sed a tyrannis et a patre eorum diabolo fucata et nunquam profutura emunt sacerdotia: quin potius velut culmen tectumque malorum omnium quoddam, quo non facile eis improperentur a quoquam admissa prisca vel nova, et cupiditatis gulæque desideria, ut pote præpositi multorum facilius rapiant, scelestæ vitæ structuræ superponunt. Nam si talis profecto coemptionis conditio ab impudentibus istis, non dicam apostolo Petro, sed cuilibet sancto sacerdoti pioque regi ingesta fuisset, eadem responsa accepissent quae ab apostolo auctor eorumdem Magus Simon, dicente Petro:
但這些人在此事上更熱切、或更絕望地犯錯,因為他們所購買的虛假且永無益處的祭司職,並非從使徒或使徒的繼承者那裏得來,乃是從暴君和他們的父魔鬼那裏得來;不僅如此,他們把這當作一切惡事的頂峰與屋頂,藉此叫他們所犯的罪行,無論新舊,都不易被人責問,又叫他們貪婪與貪食的慾望——既被立為許多人的首領——得以更輕易地擄掠,他們將這建在自己邪惡生活的結構之上。因為這等無恥之人所提出的這買賣交易,倘若加於——我不說使徒彼得,乃是任何聖潔的祭司或敬虔的君王——他們所得的回答,必與這些人之祖行邪術的西門從使徒所得的回答相同,彼得說:
But in this these men err the more eagerly, or rather the more desperately, in that they buy their sham and never profitable priesthoods not from the apostles or the successors of the apostles, but from tyrants and from their father the devil; nay rather, as a kind of crown and roof of all evils, by which the deeds they have committed, whether old or new, may not easily be reproached to them by anyone, and that the desires of their covetousness and gluttony—being set as it were over many—they may the more easily plunder, they set this upon the structure of their wicked life. For if such a bargain of purchase had been thrust by these shameless men upon—I will not say the apostle Peter, but any holy priest or godly king—they would have received the same answers which the author of these men, Simon Magus, received from the apostle, Peter saying:
5:8
Pecunia tua tecum sit in perditionem (Ibid., 20). Sed forte, heu! qui ambitores istos ordinant, imo potius humiliant, atque pro benedictione maledicunt, dum ex peccatoribus non pœnitentes, quod rectius fuerat, sed sacrilegos ei desperatos faciunt, et Judam quodammodo in Petri cathedra Domini traditorem, ac Nicolaum in loco Stephani martyris statuunt immundæ hæreseos adinventorem, codem modo sacerdotio ascili, sunt; et ideo non magnopere dctestantur in, filiis, quinimo venerantur, quod similiter ut patribus subinde venissc certissimum est. Etenim eos, si in parochiam, resistentibus sibi et tam pretiosum quæstum denegantibus serere comessoribus, hujusmodi margaritam invenire non possint;
你的銀子和你一同滅亡歸於沉淪(使徒行傳八20)。但或許,唉!那些按立這些野心之人的——或更確切地說羞辱他們、咒詛他們而非祝福他們的人,他們不把罪人變為悔改者(這本是更合宜的),反使他們成為褻瀆且絕望之人,並彷彿在彼得的座位上立了一個出賣主的猶大,在殉道者司提反的位置上立了一個發明污穢異端的尼哥拉——這些按立者自己也是以同樣方式被接納進祭司職的;所以他們在自己的兒輩身上並不大加憎惡,反倒尊崇那從他們列祖那裏也照樣屢次傳來、確鑿無疑的事。實在說來,他們若在自己的教區裏,因那些抵擋他們、不肯給此寶貴利益的同夥而尋不著這樣的珍珠,
Your money perish with you into destruction (Acts 8:20). But perhaps, alas! those who ordain these ambitious men—or rather humiliate them, and curse instead of blessing them, while out of sinners they make not penitents (which would have been more right) but sacrilegious and desperate men, and set up, as it were, a Judas the Lord's betrayer in Peter's chair, and a Nicholas the deviser of an unclean heresy in the place of Stephen the martyr—have themselves been admitted to the priesthood in the same way; and therefore they do not greatly detest in their sons—nay, rather they venerate—what it is most certain came to them likewise time and again from their fathers. For indeed, if in their parish, with the boon-companions who resist them and refuse so precious a gain, they cannot find such a pearl,
5:9
præmissis ante sollicite nuntiis, transnavigare maria, terrasque spatiosas transmeare non tam piget quam delectat; ut omnino talis species inæquiparabilisque pulchritudo, et, ut verius dieam, diabolica illusio, vel venditis omnibus copiis comparetur.
他們便先打發殷勤的信使前去,於是渡海越洋、橫跨廣闊之地,對他們並非重擔,反為樂事;好叫這等獨一無二、無可比擬的美麗——或更確切地說,這魔鬼的幻象——無論如何都得以購得,甚至不惜變賣自己一切的資財。
then, sending careful messengers on ahead, to sail across the seas and traverse spacious lands is no burden to them but a delight; that by all means such a singular and incomparable beauty—or, to speak more truly, a diabolical illusion—may be procured, even by selling all their resources.
5:10
Dein cum magno apparatu magnaque phantasia vel potius insania repedantes ad patriam, ex erecto erectiorem incessum pingunt, et dudum summitates montium conspicantes, nunc recte ad æthera vel ad summa nubium vellera, luminum semidormitantes acics librant, ac sese nova quaedam plasmata, imo diabolica organa, ut quondam Novatus Romae dominicae mulctator margaritæ porcus niger, patriae ingerunt, violenter manus non tam venerabilibus aris quam flammis inferni ultricibus, dignas in tali schema a positi sacrosanctis Christi scrificiis extensuri. CAP. III. De eadem re: ubi proposita exempla de Henoch, Noe, Abraham, Melchisedech, Moysis, Phinees et Jesu Nave.
然後,他們帶著極大的排場、極大的炫耀、或更確切地說瘋狂,返回故土,在他們本已高傲的儀態上再描畫出更高傲的步態;不久前還仰望群山之巔,如今卻把半睡半醒的眼角直接抬向諸天,或抬向雲端最高的羊毛,並把自己當作某種新奇的捏造之物——不,乃是魔鬼的器具——強加於故土,正如昔日羅馬那玷污主珍珠的黑豬挪瓦圖;他們以這樣的姿態,要從基督至聖的祭物上,伸出那不配於可敬祭壇、反配於地獄報復烈焰的手。第三章 論同一事:在此舉出以諾、挪亞、亞伯拉罕、麥基洗德、摩西、非尼哈與嫩的兒子約書亞的榜樣。
Then, returning to their homeland with great pomp and great display, or rather madness, they paint an ever loftier gait upon their already lofty bearing, and, but lately gazing at the tops of the mountains, now they poise the half-drowsy edges of their eyes straight toward the heavens or toward the highest fleeces of the clouds, and thrust themselves as certain new figments—nay, diabolical instruments—upon their homeland, like Novatus of old at Rome, that black swine, defiler of the Lord's pearl; in such a posture about to stretch out hands worthy not so much of venerable altars as of the avenging flames of hell, from the most holy sacrifices of Christ. CHAPTER THREE. On the same matter: where examples are set forth from Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Melchizedek, Moses, Phinehas and Joshua son of Nun.
5:11
— Quid, tu infelis popule, a talibus, ut dixit Apostolus (Tit. i, 12), bestiis ventris præstolaris i Ilisne corrigeris, qui seipsos non modo ad bona non incitant, sed secundum prophetæ exprobrationem: Laborant ut iuique agant (Jer. IX, 5)? Talibusne oculis illustraberis, qui hæc tantum avide speculantur, quæ proclive vitiis, id cst tartari portis ducant? Vel certe secundum Salvatoris dictum (Matth. xv, 14), si non istos rapacissimos ut Arabiæ lupos, ac si Loth ad montem igncum Sodomorum imbrem fugeritis, cæci educti a cæcis in inferni foveam cadetis.
不幸的百姓啊,你們從這等人——從使徒所說那些作了肚腹之獸的人(提多書一12)——還指望甚麼呢?你們要被那些不僅不激發自己行善、反照先知的責備:他們勞力為要作惡(耶利米書九5)的人糾正麼?你們要被這等眼睛光照麼?這眼睛只貪婪地凝視那些將人急速引向惡行、即引向地獄之門的事物。再者,照救主的話(馬太福音十五14),你們若不逃離這些阿拉伯極貪婪的豺狼,正如羅得從所多瑪的火雨逃到山上,那麼你們這被瞎子領出的瞎子,就必一同掉進地獄的坑裏。
—What, O unhappy people, do you await from such men—from those bellies that are beasts, as the Apostle said (Titus 1:12)? Are you to be corrected by those who not only do not stir themselves up to good things, but, according to the prophet's reproach: They labour that they may do evil (Jeremiah 9:5)? Are you to be enlightened by such eyes, which gaze only eagerly upon those things which lead headlong to vices—that is, to the gates of hell? Or surely, according to the Saviour's saying (Matthew 15:14), unless you flee from these most rapacious wolves of Arabia, as Lot fled from the fiery rain of Sodom to the mountain, you, blind men led out by the blind, will fall into the pit of hell.
5:12
Sed forsitan aliquis dicat non ita omnes episcopi vel presbyteri ut superius comprehensi, quia non schismatis, non superbiæ, non immunditiæ infamia maculantur, mali sunt: quod Dee vehementer et nos diffitemur. Sed licet sciamus eos castos esse et bouos, breviter tamen respondebimus: Quid pro. fuit Heli sacerdoti (I Reg. II. 11, 12; III, 12) quod soIus non violaverit praecepta Domini, rapiendo in fuscinulis, antequam adeps Domino offerretur, ex ollis carnes, dum eadem mortis ira qua filii sunt mulctatur (1 Reg. IV, 11)? Quis rogo eorum ob invidiam melioris hostiæ cœlestisque igne in coelos evectae, ut Abel, occisus (Gen. iv, 8); qui etiam mediocris verbi aspernantur convicium ?
但或許有人說,並非所有主教或長老都像上文所述的那樣邪惡,因為他們沒有沾染分裂、驕傲、不潔的惡名:這一點我們也極力不否認。但縱然我們知道有些人是貞潔良善的,我們仍要簡短地回答:祭司以利(撒母耳記上二11-12;三12)獨自沒有違背主的命令,這對他有何益處呢?他在脂油尚未獻給主之前,用肉叉從鍋中攫取肉來,他卻照樣與他兒子們一同被那同樣的死亡忿怒所刑罰(撒母耳記上四11)。請問他們當中有誰,像亞伯那樣(創世記四8),因更美祭物被天上的火帶上天去而遭嫉妒被殺呢?這些人連略帶責備之語的指摘也加以輕蔑。
But perhaps someone may say that not all bishops or presbyters are evil as those described above, since they are not stained with the infamy of schism, of pride, of uncleanness: which we too do most strongly not deny. But although we know that some are chaste and good, we shall nevertheless briefly answer: What did it profit Eli the priest (1 Samuel 2:11-12; 3:12) that he alone did not violate the precepts of the Lord, snatching with the flesh-hooks, before the fat was offered to the Lord, the flesh out of the pots, while he was punished by the same wrath of death by which his sons were (1 Samuel 4:11)? Which of them, I ask, was slain through envy of a better sacrifice carried up to heaven by celestial fire, as Abel was (Genesis 4:8); they who scorn even the reproach of a moderate word?
5:13
Quis perosus est consilium malignantium, et cum impiis non sedit (Psalm. XXV, 5), ita ut de eo veridice quasi de Henoch diceretur: Ambulavit Henoch cum Deo, et non inveniebatur (Gen. v, 2i), in mundi scilicet vanitate omnis post idola proclivc id temporis claudicarc, relicto Deo, incipientis ? Quis corum salutari in area (hoc est nunc Ec-: clesia), nullum Deo adversantem, ut Noe diluvii tempore (Gen. VII, 7), non admisit; ut perspicue monstraretur nonnisi innoxios vel pœnitentes egre gios in dominica domo esse debere! Quis victoriba solum, et in tricentario numero (hoc est Triniatis sacramento) liberato justo (Gen. XIV, 18), regin quinque victriciumque turmarum exercitus ferales vincentibus.
他們當中有誰恨惡作惡者的計謀,不與惡人同坐(詩篇二十六5),以致可以真實地論到他,正如論到以諾:以諾與神同行,神就不見了他(創世記五24)——這是在世界的虛空中,那時世界正開始離棄神,俯伏地隨從偶像而瘸腿前行?他們當中有誰,在那拯救的方舟裏(如今就是教會),不容任何敵擋神的人進入,正如挪亞在洪水之時所行的(創世記七7)——好叫人清楚看見,唯有無辜者或卓越的悔改者才應在主的家中?他們當中有誰,當那義人藉勝利、並以三百之數(即三位一體的奧祕)得釋放時(創世記十四),向那擊敗五王、潰散得勝軍兵的致命征服者獻祭,
Which of them hated the counsel of evildoers, and sat not with the ungodly (Psalm 26:5)—so that it might be truly said of him, as of Enoch: Enoch walked with God, and was not found (Genesis 5:24)—in the vanity, that is, of the world, which then was beginning to halt prone after idols, having forsaken God? Which of them, in the saving ark (which is now the Church), admitted no one who was hostile to God, as Noah did at the time of the flood (Genesis 7:7)—that it might plainly be shown that none but the harmless or eminent penitents ought to be in the Lord's house? Which of them, when the just man had been delivered by victories and in the number of three hundred (that is, the mystery of the Trinity) (Genesis 14), offering sacrifice to the deadly conquerors of the five kings and the routing armies of victorious troops,
5:14
et nequaquam aliena cupientibus, sacrificium offerens, ut Melchisedech, benedixit ? Quis sponte proprium in altari capite cædendum, ut Abrabam, Deo jubente, obtulit, filium (Gen. XXII, 1); ut simile quoddam huic impleret Christi mandatum dicentis oculum dextrum scandalizantem evelli debere (Matth. v, 29); et prophetæ præcaveret, se maledictum esse gladium et sanguinem prohibentem (Jer. XIVIII, 10) ? Quis memoriam malefacti de corda radicitus, ut Joseph (Gen. I, 15), evulsit? Quia in monte cum Domino locutus, et nequaquam concrepantibus tubis exinde perterritus (Exod. XIX, 16), duas tabulas cornutamque faciem aspectu incredulis inhabilem et horrendam tropico sensu, ut Moyses (Exod.
並且毫不貪戀別人之物,正如麥基洗德所行的,發出了祝福呢?他們當中有誰,照神的吩咐,甘心情願地將自己的兒子獻在壇上、要被砍頭,正如亞伯拉罕所行的(創世記二十二1)——好叫他成就某種類似基督的這命令,基督說,那叫人跌倒的右眼當剜出來(馬太福音五29),又謹守先知的話:禁止刀劍與血的,必受咒詛(耶利米書四十八10)?他們當中有誰,從心中把所受冤屈的記憶連根拔起,正如約瑟所行的(創世記五十15-21)?有誰在山上與主說話,其後絲毫不被號角的轟鳴所驚嚇(出埃及記十九16),帶下兩塊法版和那放光、按比喻之意對不信者眼目不堪而可畏的面容,正如摩西所行的(出埃及記
and in no way coveting what was another's, as Melchizedek did, gave a blessing? Which of them, of his own accord, offered upon the altar his own son, to be slain by the head, as Abraham did at God's command (Genesis 22:1)—that he might fulfil something like this command of Christ, who says that the right eye that causes offence ought to be plucked out (Matthew 5:29), and might beware of the prophet's word, that he is cursed who withholds his sword and blood (Jeremiah 48:10)? Which of them tore out the memory of a wrong done from his heart by the very roots, as Joseph did (Genesis 50:15-21)? Who, having spoken with the Lord on the mountain, and being in no wise terrified by the blaring trumpets thereafter (Exodus 19:16), brought down two tablets and a horned face—in a figurative sense unfit and dreadful to the sight of unbelievers—as Moses did (Exodus
5:15
XXXIV, 29), advexit Quis eorum pro peccatis populi exorans imo de pectore clamavit, ut ipse, Domine, inquiens, peccavit populus iste peccatum grande; quod si dimittis, dimitte; alioquin dele me de libro tuo (Exod. XXIII, 31, 32)? Quis zelo Dei accensus mirabili ad ultionem fornicationis sine dilatione sanando pœnitentiæ medicamine stupri affectum, ne ira populo inardesceret, sicut Phinces sacerdos (Num. xxv, 7 ) Psalm. cv, 31), ut pcr hoc in ævo reputaretur illi justitia, strenue consurrexit? Quis vero eorum vel in exstirpationem usque ad internecionem de terra promissionis septem gentium morali intelligentia, vel ad constabilitionem spiritualis Israel pro eis (Jos.
三十四29)?他們當中有誰,為百姓的罪代求,從自己胸中發出呼喊,正如摩西本人所行的,說:主啊,這百姓犯了大罪;倘若你肯赦免,就赦免;不然,求你從你的冊上塗抹我的名(出埃及記三十二31-32)?他們當中有誰,被那奇妙的、為神而發的熱心所激動,為要刑罰淫亂,毫不耽延,藉悔改的醫治良藥治好那污穢的情慾,免得忿怒向百姓發作,正如祭司非尼哈所行的(民數記二十五7;詩篇一〇六30)——好叫這事永遠算為他的義——奮然興起呢?他們當中又有誰,藉著屬靈的領會,無論是為將那七族從應許之地剷除直至滅盡,或是為在他們的地位上建立屬靈的以色列(約書亞記),
34:29)? Which of them, interceding for the sins of the people, cried out from his very breast, as he himself did, saying: O Lord, this people has sinned a great sin; yet if you forgive it, forgive; but if not, blot me out of your book (Exodus 32:31-32)? Which of them, kindled with a wondrous zeal for God unto the avenging of fornication, without delay, by the healing medicine of penitence, the lust of defilement being cured, that wrath might not be inflamed against the people, as Phinehas the priest did (Numbers 25:7; Psalm 106:31)—so that thereby righteousness might be reckoned to him for ever—rose up strenuously? And which of them, by moral understanding, either for the extirpation even to utter destruction of the seven nations from the land of promise, or for the establishment of the spiritual Israel in their stead (Joshua),
5:16
XXIV, 11) Jesum Nave imitatus est? CAP. iv. Proponuntur Jesus et Phinees (seu potius Eleazarus), Jephte, Jedeon, Samsom et Samuel. — Quis eorum po;ulo Dei linales terminos trans Jordanem, ut sciretur quid cuique tribui conveniat, sicut supradicti, Phinees a scilicet et Jesus (Jos. xix, 51), sngaciter divisere, ostendit? Quis ut adversariorum plebi Dei immunem prosternere gentium millia, unicam filiam quæ propria voluptas intelligitur, imitans et in hoc Apostolum dicentem: Non quærens quod mihi utile est, sed quod multis, ut salvi fiant (I Cor. x, 33), obviantem victoribus cum tympanis et choris (Judic.
二十四11)效法嫩的兒子約書亞呢?第四章 舉出約書亞與非尼哈(或更確切地說以利亞撒)、耶弗他、基甸、參孫與撒母耳。——他們當中有誰機巧地劃分神百姓在約但河外最終的疆界,使人知道各支派當得何分,正如前述之人——即非尼哈與約書亞(約書亞記十九51)——所行所顯明的呢?他們當中有誰,為要為神的百姓擊倒那免於仇敵之列國的千千萬萬,效法那打著鼓跳著舞迎接得勝者的獨生女兒——她被領會為他自己的喜樂(士師記),又在此效法使徒所說的:不求自己的益處,只求多人的益處,叫他們得救(哥林多前書十33),
24:11) imitated Joshua son of Nun? CHAPTER FOUR. Joshua and Phinehas (or rather Eleazar), Jephthah, Gideon, Samson and Samuel are set forth.—Which of them shrewdly divided the final boundaries of the people of God beyond the Jordan, that it might be known what was fitting to be allotted to each, as the aforesaid did—namely Phinehas and Joshua (Joshua 19:51)—and showed it? Which of them, that he might lay low for the people of God the thousands of the nations exempt from adversaries, imitating in this his only daughter—who is understood as his own delight—and the Apostle saying: Not seeking what is profitable to me, but to the many, that they may be saved (1 Corinthians 10:33), meeting his conquerors with timbrels and dances (Judges
5:17
xi, 31 ), id est carnalibus desideriis, in sacri' Ocium votivæ placationis, ut Jephte, mactavit Quis eorum ad conturbanda, fuganda sternendaque superbarum gentium castra mysteriis Trinitalis, ut supra diximus, cum lagenas viris tenentibus (Judic. VII, 6, 16, 20) egregias in manibus sonantesque tubas (id est propheticos et apostolicos sensus, ut dixit Dominus prophetæ: Exalta quasi tuba vocem tuam [Isa. LVIII, 1]; et Psalmista de apostolis: In omnem terram ex it'; I sonus corum [Psalm. XVIII, 5]) et lagcnas splendidissimo ignis lumine noctu coruscantes (quæ accipiuntur in sanctorum corporibus bonis operibus annexis, et sancti Spiritus igni ardentibus, ut Apostolus:
十一31)——即他的肉體情慾——作為還願平安祭的祭物,將她獻上,正如耶弗他所行的呢?他們當中有誰,為了攪亂、潰散並擊倒驕傲列國的營壘,藉著三位一體的奧祕(如我們上文所說),與那些拿著瓶子的人一同(士師記七6、16、20),手中揮舞著那精良而響亮的號角(即先知與使徒的意義,正如主對先知所說:你要大聲喊叫,像吹角一樣〔以賽亞書五十八1〕,又如詩人論到使徒:他們的聲音傳遍全地〔詩篇十九4〕),以及那在夜間以極燦爛之火光閃耀的瓶子(被領會為在眾聖徒的身體裏,與善行相連,被聖靈的火焚燒,正如使徒所說:
11:31)—that is, his carnal desires—into the sacrifice of votive propitiation, slew her, as Jephthah did? Which of them, for the throwing into confusion, the routing, and the laying low of the camps of the proud nations, by the mysteries of the Trinity (as we have said above), with the men holding the jars (Judges 7:6, 16, 20), wielded in their hands the excellent and sounding trumpets (that is, the prophetic and apostolic meanings, as the Lord said to the prophet: Lift up your voice like a trumpet [Isaiah 58:1], and the Psalmist concerning the apostles: Their sound has gone out into all the earth [Psalm 19:4]), and the jars flashing by night with the most splendid light of fire (which are taken to be in the bodies of the saints, joined with good works and burning with the fire of the Holy Spirit, as the Apostle says:
5:18
Habentes, inquit [II Cor., IV, 7], thesaurum istum in vasis fictilibus) post idololatriæ luci (quod moraliter interpretatum, condensæ et fuscæ cupiditatis) succisionem silvæ (Judic. VI, 25), et evidentia figmenta Judaici velleris imbris coelestis experti (Ibid., 37), et gentilis, rore sancti Spiritus madefacti, fide non dubia, ut Gedeon, processit (Judic. VII, 1) ? Quis eorum mori exoptans mundo et vivere Christo (Philip. I, 23), luxuriosos gentium convivas laudantes deos suos (Judic. XVI, 2325) (id est sensus extollentes divitias, ut Apostolus: Et avaritia, inquit [Coloss.
祂說〔哥林多後書四7〕,我們有這寶貝在瓦器裏)——在砍倒那拜偶像的樹叢之後(這從道德上解釋,乃是濃密幽暗貪婪的森林)(士師記六25),又在經歷天上之雨澆在猶太羊毛上的明顯記號(士師記六37),以及外邦人被聖靈的甘露沾濕之後——憑著毫無疑惑的信德前去,正如基甸所行的(士師記七1)呢?他們當中有誰,渴望向世界死、向基督活(腓立比書一23),當列國奢華的筵宴者讚美他們的神明時(士師記十六23-25)(即心思高舉財富,正如使徒所說〔歌羅西書
We have, he says [2 Corinthians 4:7], this treasure in earthen vessels)—after the cutting down of the grove of idolatry (which, morally interpreted, is the forest of dense and dark covetousness) (Judges 6:25), and after experiencing the evident signs of the heavenly rain upon the Jewish fleece (Judges 6:37) and, of the Gentiles, being wetted with the dew of the Holy Spirit—with undoubting faith, as Gideon did, went forth (Judges 7:1)? Which of them, longing to die to the world and to live to Christ (Philippians 1:23), the luxurious feasters of the nations praising their gods (Judges 16:23-25) (that is, the senses extolling riches, as the Apostle says [Colossians
5:19
III, 5], quæ est simulacrorum servitus) concussis duabus virtute brachiorum columnis (quæ intelliguntur in voluptatibus nequam animae cannisque, quibus domus humanæ omnis nequitiæ quodammodo pangitur ac fulcimentatur) tam innumerabiles, ut Samson (Judic. XVI, 29, 30), prostravit? Quis orationibus holocaustoque lactantis agni metum depellens (I Reg. VII, 19), insperatas tonitruorum voces nubiumque imbres concitans (1 Reg. In, 17), absque adulatione regem constituens (1 Reg. x, 1, 24), cumdem Deo non placentem abjiciens uncto pro illo meliore in regno (1 Reg. XIII, 14; xv, 28; XVI, 13), ut Samuel, valedicturus populo astabit hoc modo dicens: Ecce præsto sum;
三5〕,這便是事奉偶像)——那兩根柱子被他膀臂的力量所搖撼(這被領會為在魂與體的邪惡逸樂中,人一切罪惡的房屋藉此彷彿被構建並支撐起來)——擊倒了那麼不可勝數的群眾,正如參孫所行的(士師記十六29-30)呢?他們當中有誰,藉禱告與獻一隻吃奶羔羊為燔祭,趕走懼怕(撒母耳記上七9-10),激起意料之外的雷聲與密雲的大雨(撒母耳記上十二17),不憑諂媚立了一個王(撒母耳記上十1、24),又在那王不討神喜悅時將他棄絕,立另一更美者受膏接續他作王(撒母耳記上十三14;十五28;十六13),正如撒母耳所行的,要站起來向百姓告別,這樣說:看哪,我在這裏;
3:5], which is the service of idols)—the two columns being shaken by the strength of his arms (which are understood to be in the wicked pleasures of the soul and the flesh, by which the whole house of human wickedness is in a manner framed and propped up)—laid low so innumerable a host, as Samson did (Judges 16:29-30)? Which of them, by prayers and the holocaust of a suckling lamb driving away fear (1 Samuel 7:9-10), stirring up unlooked-for voices of thunder and showers of clouds (1 Samuel 12:17), appointing a king without flattery (1 Samuel 10:1, 24), and casting off that same king when he displeased God, for a better one anointed in the kingdom in his place (1 Samuel 13:14; 15:28; 16:13), as Samuel did, will stand to bid farewell to the people, speaking in this wise: Behold, here I am;
5:20
loquimini coram Domino et Christo ejus, utrum bovem cujusquam tulerim, an asinum; si quempiam calumniatus sum, si oppressi aliquem, si de manu cujusquam munus accepi (1 Reg. XII, 2, 3). Cui a populo respoDsum est dicente: Non es calumniatus nos, neMne oppressisti, neque tulisti de manu alicujus quippiam (Ibid., 4). CAP. v. Recensentur exempla Eliæ, Elisæi et Isaiæ. — Quis eorum igne cœlesti centum superbos exurens, quinquaginta humiles servans (IV Reg.
我若奪過誰的牛,或奪過誰的驢,或欺壓過誰,或虧負過誰,或從誰手裏受過賄賂,你們可以在主和祂的受膏者面前作見證指控我(撒母耳記上十二2-3)。百姓回答他說:你未曾欺壓我們,虧負我們,也未曾從誰手裏受過甚麼(撒母耳記上十二4)。第五章 述說以利亞、以利沙與以賽亞的榜樣。——他們當中有誰,以天上的火燒滅一百個驕傲之人,卻存留五十個謙卑之人(列王紀下
speak before the Lord and before His Anointed, whether I have taken any man's ox, or his ass; if I have wronged any man, if I have oppressed anyone, if I have received a bribe from any man's hand (1 Samuel 12:2-3). To whom answer was made by the people, saying: You have not wronged us, nor oppressed us, nor have you taken anything from any man's hand (1 Samuel 12:4). CHAPTER FIVE. Examples of Elijah, Elisha and Isaiah are recounted.—Which of them, with heavenly fire burning up a hundred proud men, and sparing fifty humble ones (2 Kings
5:21
i, 10, ii, 15), et absque adulationis luco non Deum per prophetas, sed idolum Accaron, consulenti mortem imminentem iniquo regi annuntians (Ibid., 16), omnes prophetas simulacri Baal (qui interpretati accipiuntur sensus humani invidix, avaritiæ, ut jam diximus, semper intenti) mucrone corusco, hoc est verbo Dei, ut Elias egregius vates.prostravit (III Reg. XVIII, 40), et zelo Dei commotus iniquorum terra imbres adimens retherales, ac si fortissimo penuriæ clustello tribus annis sexque mensibus obseratos (III Reg. XVII, 1), fame, siti moribundus in deserto conquestus est: Domine, inquiens, prophetas tuos occiderunt, et altaria tua suffoderunt;
一10-12)——並且不憑諂媚的樹叢,向那邪惡的王宣告他即將臨到的死亡,因他不藉先知求問神,反求問以革倫的偶像(列王紀下一16)——以那閃爍的刀劍、即神的話,擊倒了偶像巴力所有的先知(這被領會為人嫉妒與貪婪的心思,如我們已說過的,總是專注於這些事),正如卓越的先見以利亞所行的(列王紀上十八40)呢?他又因為神發熱心,從惡人之地除去天上的雨水,彷彿用最堅固的饑荒門閂將其封閉三年零六個月(列王紀上十七1),在曠野因飢渴瀕死,發出哀怨說:主啊,祂說,他們殺了你的眾先知,拆毀了你的祭壇;
1:10-12)—and, without the grove of flattery, announcing to the wicked king his impending death, since he consulted not God through the prophets, but the idol of Ekron (2 Kings 1:16)—laid low all the prophets of the idol Baal (which are understood as the human senses of envy and avarice, as we have already said, ever bent on these things) with the flashing sword, that is, the word of God, as Elijah the eminent seer did (1 Kings 18:40)? And, moved with zeal for God, taking away the heavenly showers from the land of the wicked, as if shutting them up with the strongest bolt of dearth for three years and six months (1 Kings 17:1), dying of hunger and thirst in the desert, complained: O Lord, He said, they have slain your prophets and dug down your altars;
5:22
et ego relictus sum solus, et quaerunt animam meam (III Reg. xix, 10)? Quis eorum charissimum discipulum terrenis extra solitum ponderibus oneratum (IV Reg. v, 23), quæ ante ea a se magnopere licet rogato ut acciperet despecta fuissent (Ibid., 16), etsi non perpetua lepra, ut Elisæus, saltim expulsione mulctavit (IV Reg. v, 27)? Et quis ex illis puero in vitæ desperatione æstuanti, atque improviso super bellico hostium apparatu civilatem in qua erant obsidientium tremefacto (IV Reg.
獨剩下我一人,他們還尋索我的命(列王紀上十九10)呢?他們當中有誰,刑罰了自己至愛的門徒——那門徒被屬地的重擔過度地壓上(列王紀下五23)——這些重擔在此之前曾被以利沙本人所輕看,雖然有人極力懇求他收受(列王紀下五16)——縱然不像以利沙那樣以永久的痲瘋刑罰,至少以驅逐刑罰(列王紀下五27)呢?他們當中又有誰,向一個對生命絕望、沸騰焦灼的少年僕人,那僕人因仇敵戰爭的陣勢忽然圍困他們所在的城而被嚇得戰兢(列王紀下
and I, even I only, am left, and they seek my life (1 Kings 19:10)? Which of them punished his dearest disciple, burdened beyond his wont with earthly weights (2 Kings 5:23)—things which before this had been scorned by Elisha himself, though greatly entreated to receive them (2 Kings 5:16)—even if not with perpetual leprosy, as Elisha did, at least with expulsion (2 Kings 5:27)? And which of them, to a servant boiling over with despair of life, and suddenly struck with terror at the warlike apparatus of the enemy surrounding the city in which they were (2 Kings
5:23
VI, 15), inter nos (ut ille) animæ visus ferventi exoratione ad Deum facta (ita ut intueri poterit [Ibid., 17] auxiliarium cœlestis exercitus armalorum curruum ceu equitum ignito vultu fulgentium montem plenum ) patefecit, et credere (Ibid., 16) quin fortior esset ad salvandum quam inimici ad pugnandum? Et quis eorum corporis tactu ( I V Reg. IV, 34), mortui scilicet mundo, viventis autem Deo, alii diverso funere occubanti, procul dubio mortuo Deo, vitiis vero viventi, quasi supra dictus, proficiet; ita ut statim prosiliens Christo grates pro sanitate agat cunctorum pene mortalium ore desperata ?
六15)——在我們中間(正如他所行的),藉著為他靈魂的眼目向神所獻熱切的禱告(好叫他能看見〔列王紀下六17〕那滿了天軍援兵、披甲戰車、和面容放著火光之馬兵的山)——開了他的眼睛,使他相信(列王紀下六16)那能拯救者比那些爭戰的仇敵更強大呢?他們當中又有誰,藉著自己身體的觸摸(列王紀下四34)——即一個向世界死、卻向神活之人的觸摸——能使另一個躺在另一種死亡中的人得益處?那人無疑向神死了、卻向罪惡活著,正如前述者一樣;以致那人立刻跳起,為那幾乎被所有世人之口宣告絕望的健康,向基督獻上感謝?
6:15)—in our midst (as he did), by a fervent prayer made to God for the sight of his soul (so that he might be able to behold [2 Kings 6:17] the mountain full of the auxiliary host of the heavenly army, of armed chariots, and of horsemen shining with fiery countenance)—opened his eyes, and made him believe (2 Kings 6:16) that He who was stronger to save was greater than the enemies were to fight? And which of them, by the touch of his body (2 Kings 4:34)—of one dead to the world, but living to God—will be of profit to another lying low in a different death, doubtless dead to God but living to vices, as the aforesaid was; so that, leaping up at once, he renders thanks to Christ for a health despaired of by the mouths of almost all mortals?
5:24
Cujiis eorum carbone ignito de altari forcipe cberobin advecto ( ut peccata sua delerentur humilitate confessionis) labia, ut Isaiæ, mundata sunt (Isa. V!, 6, 7), et eflicaci oratione sibi adjuncta pii regis Ezechiæ (IV Reg. XII, i, 14; Isa. XXXVII, 1, 15), sup-. plantatione centum octoginta quinque millia exercitus Assyriorum, nullo apparente vulneris vestigio, angeli manu, ut supradicti, prostrala sunt (IV Reg. XIX, 35; Isa. XXVII, 36)? Quis eorum ob præcepta Dei et minas cœlitus datas (Jer. i, 17), veritatemque vel non audientibus proferendam, squalores pædoresque carcerum (Jer. xx, i; XXXII, 2: XXXVII, 15; XXXVIII, 6), et momentaneas morte, (Jer.
他們當中有誰,像以賽亞那樣,被基路伯用火鉗從壇上取來的火炭潔淨了嘴唇(好叫他的罪藉認罪的謙卑得以塗抹)(以賽亞書六6-7),又有敬虔之王希西家有功效的禱告與他相連(列王紀下十九1、14-15;以賽亞書三十七1、15),看見亞述的軍兵十八萬五千被天使的手擊倒、毫無受傷的痕跡顯現,正如前述者所行的(列王紀下十九35;以賽亞書三十七36)呢?他們當中有誰,為了神的命令和從天上所發的威嚇(耶利米書一17),並為了那即使向不肯聽的人也必須宣講的真理,忍受了監牢的污穢與惡臭(耶利米書二十2;三十二2;三十七15;三十八6),以及一次次的死亡威脅(耶利米書
Which of them had his lips cleansed, as Isaiah's were, by a burning coal carried from the altar by the cherubim's tongs (that his sins might be wiped away by the humility of confession) (Isaiah 6:6-7), and, the efficacious prayer of the godly king Hezekiah being joined to him (2 Kings 19:1, 14-15; Isaiah 37:1, 15), saw one hundred and eighty-five thousand of the Assyrian army laid low by the hand of an angel, with no trace of a wound appearing, as the aforesaid did (2 Kings 19:35; Isaiah 37:36)? Which of them, for the precepts of God and the threats given from heaven (Jeremiah 1:17), and for the truth that must be uttered even to those who would not hear, endured the filth and stench of prisons (Jeremiah 20:2; 32:2; 37:15; 38:6), and momentary deaths (Jeremiah
5:25
XXVI, 8, 14), ut beatus Jeremias, excepit? Et ne multa: Quis corum, ut Magister gentium dixit (Hebr. XI, 37, 38), errare in montibus, et in speluncis et in caventis, lapidari, secari, totius mortis genere pro nomine Domini attentari, sicut sancti prophetæ, perpessus est? CAP. VI. Deinde ex Novo Testamento Jacobus primus, Petrus et Paulus. — Sed quid immoramur in eiemplis veteribus, ac si non essent in novo ulla ? Audiant itaque nos qui absque ullo labore angustum hoc iter Christianae religionis, prætento tantum sacerdotali nomine, inlrare se putaat, carpentes paucos flores, veluti summos, de extento sanctorum Novi Testamenti tironum amœnoque prato.
二十六8、14),正如蒙福的耶利米所行的呢?簡言之:他們當中有誰,正如萬民的教師所說(希伯來書十一37-38),忍受在山嶺、山洞、地穴中漂流,被石頭打死,被鋸鋸死,為主的名受各樣死亡的試煉,正如眾聖先知所行的呢?第六章 接著從新約:首先是雅各,然後是彼得與保羅。——但我們何必在古時的榜樣上躊躇,彷彿新約中沒有任何榜樣呢?所以,那些自以為毫不費力、只憑提出祭司之名便進入基督信仰這窄路的人,且讓他們聽我們說;他們從新約聖徒新兵那廣闊宜人的草場上,採擷幾朵彷彿是最精選的花。
26:8, 14), as the blessed Jeremiah did? And, to be brief: Which of them, as the Teacher of the nations said (Hebrews 11:37-38), endured to wander in the mountains, and in caves and in the hollows of the earth, to be stoned, to be sawn asunder, to be tried by every kind of death for the name of the Lord, as the holy prophets did? CHAPTER SIX. Then from the New Testament: James the first, Peter and Paul.—But why do we linger over the examples of old, as if there were none in the New? Let them hear us, therefore, who think that without any labour they enter this narrow path of the Christian religion, putting forward only the priestly name, while they pluck a few flowers, as it were the choicest, from the wide and pleasant meadow of the recruits of the saints of the New Testament.
5:26
Quis vestrum, qui torpetis potius quam sedetis legitime in sacerdotali sede, ejectus de concilio impiorum, post diversarum plagas virgarum (Act. XVI, 23), ut sancti apostoli, quod dignus habitus est (Act. v, 41) pro Christo vero Deo contumeliam pati, toto corde Trinitati gratias egit? Quis ob testimonium vero Deo ferendum fullonis vecte crebro percussus, ut Jacobus, primus in Novo duntaxat episcopus Testamento, corporaliter interiit ? Quis gladio vestrum ab iniquo principe, ut Jacobus Joannis frater (Ad. XII, 2), capite caesus est? Quis ut protominister martyrque evangelicus, hoc solum criminis habens, quod viderit Deum, quem perlidi videre nequiverunt, nefandis manibus lapidatus est (Act.
你們當中有誰,你們這些寧可昏沉、也不肯合法坐在祭司座位上的人,被趕出不敬虔者的議會,受過各樣杖打之後(使徒行傳十六23),正如眾聖使徒所行的——他們被算為配(使徒行傳五41)為真神基督受凌辱——曾全心向三位一體獻上感謝呢?你們當中有誰,為了向真神作見證,屢次被漂布者的棍棒擊打,正如雅各——至少是新約中第一位主教——肉身死去呢?你們當中有誰,被邪惡的君王用刀斬首,正如約翰的兄弟雅各所遭遇的(使徒行傳十二2)呢?你們當中有誰,作頭一位執事與福音的殉道者,只有這一項「罪名」——就是他看見了那不信者所不能看見的神——而被不虔的手用石頭打死(使徒行傳
Which of you, who rather grow torpid than sit lawfully in the priestly seat, being cast out of the council of the impious, after the blows of various rods (Acts 16:23), as the holy apostles did—who were counted worthy (Acts 5:41) to suffer reproach for Christ the true God—gave thanks to the Trinity with his whole heart? Which of you, for the testimony to be borne to the true God, repeatedly struck with a fuller's club, as James, the first bishop in the New Testament at least, perished in the body? Which of you was beheaded with the sword by a wicked prince, as James the brother of John was (Acts 12:2)? Which of you, as the first minister and evangelical martyr, having this alone as his crime—that he had seen God, whom the faithless could not see—was stoned by impious hands (Acts
5:27
VII, 57) ? Quis inversis pcdibus crucis affixus pro reverentia Christi patibulo, ut clavicularius ille coelorum regni idoneus, extremum halitum fudit? Quis ex vobis gladii ictu veridicantis pro confessione Christi post vincula, carceres, naufragia, amaram virgarum caedem, post fluminum, latronum, gentium, Judæorum, pseudoapostolorum continua pericula, post famis, jejunii, vigiliarum labores, post perpetem sollicitudinem omnium Ecclesiarum, post aestum pro scandalizantibus, post infirmitatem pro infirmis, post admirabilem prædicando Christi Evangelium orbis pene circuitum, ut Vas electionis magisterque gentium electus, capite plexus est? CAP. VII. Exemplum sancti Ignatii martyris.
七57)呢?你們當中有誰,因敬重基督的刑架,被頭下腳上倒釘在十字架上,正如那配得天國的執鑰者所行的,吐出了最後一口氣呢?你們當中有誰,為了承認基督,藉一把說真理之劍的一擊——在經過鎖鏈、監牢、船破、棍棒苦打之後;在經過江河、強盜、外邦人、猶太人、假使徒不斷的危險之後;在經過飢餓、禁食、儆醒的勞苦之後;在經過為眾教會永恆的掛慮之後;在經過為那些被絆跌之人焦灼的痛苦之後;在經過為軟弱之人而有的軟弱之後;在經過傳揚基督福音那奇妙、幾乎遍及全世界的行程之後——作為蒙揀選的器皿和列國蒙選的師傅,被斬首呢?第七章 聖殉道者依格那修的榜樣。
7:57)? Which of you, fastened to a cross with his feet inverted, out of reverence for Christ's gibbet, as that key-bearer worthy of the kingdom of heaven did, breathed out his last breath? Which of you, by the stroke of a truth-speaking sword, for the confession of Christ—after chains, prisons, shipwrecks, the bitter beating of rods; after the continual perils of rivers, robbers, Gentiles, Jews, false apostles; after the labours of hunger, fasting, watchings; after the perpetual care of all the churches; after the burning anguish for those who were caused to stumble; after the infirmity on behalf of the infirm; after the wonderful, well-nigh world-wide circuit in preaching the Gospel of Christ—as the Vessel of election and chosen master of the nations, was beheaded? CHAPTER SEVEN. The example of the holy martyr Ignatius.
5:28
— Quis vestrum, ut sanctus martyr Ignatius Antiochie urbis episcopus, post admirabiles in Christo actus, ob testimonium ejus leonum molis Romæ confractus est ? cujus verba cum ad passionem duceretur audientes (si aliquando vultus vestri rubore suffusi sunt), non solum in comparatione ejus vos non putabitis sacerdotes, sed ne mediocres quidem Christianos esse. Ait enim in epistola quam ad Romanam Ecclesiam niisit: « A Syria usque Romam cum bestiis terra marique depugno die ac nocte, connexus et colligatus decem leopardis, militibus dico ad custodiam datis, qui et beneficiis nostris sæviores fiunt. Sed ego eorum nequitiis magis erudior, nec tamen in hoc justificatus sum.
——你們當中有誰,像安提阿城的主教、聖殉道者依格那修那樣,在基督裏成就了可佩的事蹟之後,為了給祂作見證,在羅馬被獅群的重壓所撕裂呢?他被帶去受難時所說的話,你們若聽見(倘若你們的臉曾何時羞紅),就不僅不會自以為與他相比是祭司,連普通的基督徒也不會自以為是。因為他在寄給羅馬教會的書信中說:「我從敘利亞一直到羅馬,晝夜在陸地海上與野獸搏鬥,被綑綁繫於十隻豹子,我是說那些受派看守我的兵丁,他們因我們的善意反倒更加凶暴。但我藉著他們的惡行愈發受教;然而我並不因此稱義。」
—Which of you, as the holy martyr Ignatius, bishop of the city of Antioch, after his admirable deeds in Christ, was, for the testimony of Him, crushed by the mass of lions at Rome? Whose words, as he was being led to his passion, if you hear them (if ever your faces were suffused with a blush), you will not only not think yourselves priests in comparison with him, but not even ordinary Christians. For he says in the epistle which he sent to the Roman Church: 「From Syria all the way to Rome I fight with beasts by land and sea, day and night, bound and fettered to ten leopards—I mean the soldiers given to guard me, who become the fiercer for our kindnesses. But by their wickednesses I am the more instructed; yet not by this am I justified.」
5:29
0 salutares bestias quæ præparantur mihi, quando venient? quando emittentur? quando eis frui licebit carnibus meis ? quas ego exopto acriores parari, et invitabo ad devorationem mei, et deprecabor ne forte (ut in nonnullis fecerunt) timeant attingere corpus meum; quinimo, etsi cunctabuntur, ego vim faciam, ego me ingeram. Date, quaeso, veniam: ego novi quid expediat mihi. Nunc iucipio esse Christi discipulus: facessat invidia, vel humani affectus, vel nequitiæ spiritualis, ut in Jesum Christum adipisci mercar ignes, cruces, bestias, dispersiones ossium, discerptionesque membrorum.
「哦,那為我預備的救恩之獸——牠們何時要來?何時要被放出?何時纔得准許享用我的肉身?我切望牠們被造得更凶猛,我要邀請牠們吞吃我,我要懇求牠們不要(像牠們對某些人所行的那樣)懼怕觸碰我的身體;不僅如此,牠們縱然遲疑,我也要強行,我要把自己投上去。我求你們准我:我知道甚麼於我有益。如今我纔開始作基督的門徒:但願嫉妒離去,無論是人情的嫉妒,或屬靈邪惡的嫉妒,叫我配得著耶穌基督——火、十字架、野獸、骨頭的離散、肢體的撕裂。」
「O the saving beasts which are prepared for me—when will they come? when will they be let loose? when will it be permitted them to feast on my flesh? I long for them to be made fiercer, and I will invite them to devour me, and I will beseech them lest perchance (as they have done with some) they fear to touch my body; nay rather, even if they should hesitate, I will use force, I will thrust myself upon them. Grant me, I pray, your pardon: I know what is expedient for me. Now I begin to be a disciple of Christ: let envy depart, whether of human affection or of spiritual wickedness, that I may be worthy to attain unto Jesus Christ—fires, crosses, beasts, scatterings of bones, and tearings of limbs.」
5:30
ac totius corporis poenae, et omnia in me unum supplicia diaboli arte quesita compleantur, dummodo Jesum Christum merear adipisci. » Quid ad hæc dormitantibus animæ oculis aspicitis Quid talia surdis sensuum auribus auscultatis? Discutite quaeso tenebrosam atramquc cordis vestri caliginem temporis, ut veritatis et humilitatis præfulgidum lumen videre possitis. Christianus non mediocris sed perfectus, sacerdos non vilis sed summus, martyr non segnis sed praecipuus dicit: Nunc incipio esse Christi discipulus. Et vos ac si Lucifer ille de coelo projectus (Isa. xiv, 12), verbis non potestate erigimini, et quodammodo sub dente ruminatis et gestibus prætenditis, quæ antea auctor vester depinxerat:
「以及我全身的痛苦,願魔鬼詭計所設計的一切酷刑都成就在我一人身上,只要我能配得著耶穌基督。」對這些事,你們用魂中昏睡的眼睛看見了甚麼呢?你們為何用感官失聰的耳朵聽這樣的話呢?我求你們,搖去你們心中如今這時陰暗苦澀的幽暗,好叫你們能看見真理與謙卑那至為輝煌的光。一位基督徒,不是平庸的而是純全的;一位祭司,不是卑賤的而是至高的;一位殉道者,不是懶散的而是卓越的,竟說:如今我纔開始作基督的門徒。你們卻彷彿是那從天上被摔下的明亮之星(以賽亞書十四12),只憑言語而非能力被高舉,並在某種意義上把你們的祖先先前所描繪的話咀嚼在齒下、藉舉止顯露出來:
「and the pains of my whole body, and let all the torments devised by the devil's craft be fulfilled upon me alone, provided only that I may be worthy to attain unto Jesus Christ.」 What do you behold in answer to these things, with the drowsy eyes of your soul? Why do you give ear to such words with the deaf ears of your senses? Shake off, I pray, the dark and bitter gloom of your heart's present time, that you may be able to see the most resplendent light of truth and humility. A Christian, not ordinary but perfect; a priest, not base but supreme; a martyr, not sluggish but pre-eminent, says: Now I begin to be a disciple of Christ. And you, as if you were that Lucifer cast down from heaven (Isaiah 14:12), are lifted up by words and not by power, and in a manner chew under your teeth and display by your gestures the things which your author had before depicted:
5:31
In cælum, inquiens, conscendam, et ero similis Altissimo (Ibid., 13). Et iterum: Ego fodi et bibi aquam, et exsiccavi vestigio pedum meorum omnes rivos aggerum (Isa. XXXVII, 25). Multo rectius oportebat vos imitari illum et audite, qui totius bonitatis et humilitatis vere invictum exemplar est, dicentem per prophetam: Ego autem sum vermis et non homo, opprobrium hominum et abjectio plebis ( Psalm. XXI, 7 ). 0 mirabile quoddam dixisse eum opprobrium hominum, cum omnis mundi opprobria deleverit; et iterum in Evangelio: Non possum ego a me ipso facere quidquam (Joan. v, 30);
祂說,我要升到天上,我要與至高者一樣(以賽亞書十四13)。又說:我已掘了,喝了水,我用腳掌踏乾堤岸的一切河流(以賽亞書三十七25)。你們本應更合宜地效法並聽從那位,祂是一切良善與謙卑真正不可戰勝的典範,藉先知說:但我是蟲,不是人,被眾人羞辱,被百姓藐視(詩篇二十二6)。哦,奇妙的事,祂竟稱自己為被眾人羞辱的,而祂卻塗抹了全世界的羞辱!又在福音書中說:我憑著自己不能作甚麼(約翰福音五30);
I will ascend, he says, into heaven, and I will be like the Most High (Isaiah 14:13). And again: I have dug and drunk water, and with the sole of my feet I have dried up all the streams of the dykes (Isaiah 37:25). Far more rightly ought you to imitate and hear Him who is the truly unconquered exemplar of all goodness and humility, saying through the prophet: But I am a worm and no man, the reproach of men and the outcast of the people (Psalm 22:6). O wondrous thing, that He should have called Himself the reproach of men, when He has blotted out the reproaches of all the world! And again in the Gospel: I can do nothing of myself (John 5:30);
5:32
cum ipse coævus Patri ac Spiritui sancto communia ejusdemque substantiae coelum et terram cum omni eorum inæstimabili ornamento fecerit, non alterius, sed propria potestate; et vos arroganter verba exaltasse, propheta dicente: Quid superbit terra et cinis (Eccli. x, 9)? CAP. VIII. Exemplum sancti Polycarpi: ubi et loca sacrarum Scripturarum in medium adducta. — Sed ad propositum rcvertar. Quis, inquam, ex vobis, ut Smyrnensis Ecclesiæ pastor egregius Polycarpus Christi testis, mensam humane hospilibus ad ignem cum avide trahentibus apposuit, et objectus flammis pro Christi charitate dixit: Qui dedit mihi ignis ferre supplicium, dabit ut sine clavorum confixione flammas immobiliter perferam.
祂卻與父和聖靈同永,並與祂們共有同一本質,造了天地及其一切無可估量的裝飾——不是憑藉別人的能力,乃是憑藉自己的能力;你們卻傲慢地高抬自己的言語,先知卻說:塵土爐灰為何驕傲呢(便西拉智訓十9)?第八章 聖坡旅甲的榜樣:在此也舉出聖經的經文。——但讓我回到本題。我說,你們當中有誰,像士每拿教會卓越的牧人、基督的見證人坡旅甲那樣,當人們急切地把他拖向火堆時,他仍親切地為他的賓客在火旁擺設桌子,並為著基督的愛被投入火焰,說:那賜我擔當火刑的,必使我不用釘子釘住,便能不動搖地忍受火焰呢?
although He Himself, coeval with the Father and the Holy Spirit, and of the same substance common with them, made heaven and earth with all their inestimable adornment—not by another's, but by His own power; and you have arrogantly exalted your words, while the prophet says: Why is earth and ashes proud (Sirach 10:9)? CHAPTER EIGHT. The example of holy Polycarp: where also passages of the sacred Scriptures are brought forward.—But let me return to my purpose. Which, I say, of you, as Polycarp the eminent pastor and witness of Christ of the Church of Smyrna, set out a table kindly for his guests at the fire when they were eagerly dragging him to it, and, cast into the flames for the love of Christ, said: He who gave me to bear the punishment of fire will grant that, without the fastening of nails, I may endure the flames unmoved.
5:33
Unum adhuc, præter magnam verbis volans sanctorum silvam, exempli gratia ponam Basilium, scilicet Cæsariensem episcopum, qui, cum ab iniquo principe minæ hujusmodi intentarentur, quod nisi in crastinum Ariano cœno ut caeteri macularetur, esset omnino moriturus, dixisse fertur: Ego sane ero cras qui hodie sum; tu te utinam non mutares! Et iterum: Utinam haberem aliquid digni muneris, quod afferrem huic qui maturius futilium de nodo follis hujus absolveret! Quis ex vobis apostolici sermonis regulam, quæ ab omnibus semper sanctis sacerJotibus quibusque temporibus exstantibus, humanam suggestionem præcipitanter ad nequitiam.
除了我以言語飛越的眾聖徒那廣大的森林之外,我還要再舉一個榜樣為例——就是該撒利亞的主教巴西流。當一位邪惡的君王向他發出這樣的威嚇,說他若不在次日像其餘的人一樣被亞流派的污泥所玷污,就必定要死,據傳他回答說:我明日仍要作我今日所是的人;但願你不要改變你自己!又說:但願我有甚麼配得的禮物可獻給這人,好叫他更快地把我從這無用之皮囊瑣事的結扣中解開!你們當中有誰持守使徒之言的準則?這準則被一切時代一切存在的眾聖潔祭司所持守,〔約束〕那急速奔向邪惡的人性慫恿……
One thing more, besides the great forest of the saints over which I fly in words, I will set down by way of example—namely Basil, bishop of Caesarea, who, when threats of this kind were aimed at him by a wicked prince, that unless on the morrow he were defiled with the Arian mire like the rest, he should certainly die, is said to have replied: I, indeed, will be tomorrow what I am today; would that you would not change yourself! And again: Would that I had something of a worthy gift to offer to this man who would the sooner release me from the knot of this worthless bag of trifles! Which of you holds to the rule of the apostolic word, which by all the holy priests at all times existing, [restrained] human prompting that rushes headlong to wickedness...
5:34
festinantem recutientibus, servata est, in concussione tyrannorum indirupte custodit, hoc modo dicens: Obedire oportet magis Deo quam hominibus (Act. III, 29) ? Igitur confugientes solito more ad Domini misericordiam sanctorumque prophetarum ejus voces, ut illi pro nobis oraculorum suorum jacula, imperfectis pastoribus, ut antea tyrannis, qucis cosi puncti sancntur, librent; videamus quod Dominus per prophetas ad desides et inhonestos sacerdotes, et non bene populum tam exempla quam verba docentes, minarum loquatur.
……當它向回擊者疾行時,已蒙保全,在暴君的動盪之中將它完整無損地保守住,如此說道:「順從神,不順從人,是應當的」(使徒行傳五章二十九節)。因此,我們照常逃往主的憐憫,並逃向祂眾聖先知的言語,求他們為我們將祂神諭的箭,如同從前射向暴君一般,射向那些不完全的牧人——這些人藉此被刺透、受懲治;讓我們來看主藉眾先知,向那些懶惰而不光彩的祭司,並那些以榜樣與言語都未善教百姓之人,所說的威嚇之言。
...has been preserved as it hastens to those who strike back, and amid the turmoil of tyrants it keeps it unbroken, saying in this manner: 'We must obey God rather than men' (Acts 5:29). Therefore, fleeing as is our custom to the mercy of the Lord and to the voices of His holy prophets, that they may hurl on our behalf the darts of His oracles against imperfect shepherds, as formerly against tyrants, by which these men are pricked and chastened, let us see what the Lord, through the prophets, speaks by way of threats against slothful and dishonourable priests, who teach the people not well, by example as much as by word.
5:35
Nam et Heli ille sacerdos in Silo pro eo quod non digno Dei zelo severe in filios contemnentes Deum ultus fuerat, sed molliter et clementer ut pole paterno afiectu admonuerat, tali animadversione damnatur, dicente ad eum propheta: Manifeste ostendi me ad domum patris tui, cum essent in Ægypto servientes Pharaoni; et elegi domum patris tui ex omnibus tribubus Israel mihi in sacerdotio (I Reg. II, 27, 28). Et post pauca: Quare respexisti in incensum meum et in sacrificium meum improbo oculo ? et honorificasti filios tuos plus quam me, ut benediceres eos a primordio in omnibus sacrificiis coram me? Et nunc hæc dicit Dominus: Quoniam qui honorificant me, honorabo eos;
因為連那位在示羅的祭司以利,正因他沒有以配得神的熱心、嚴厲地懲治那些藐視神的兒子,反倒柔和寬容地、彷彿出於父親的慈愛勸誡他們,就受了這樣的判決,先知對他說:「他們在埃及作法老的奴僕時,我明明地向你父的家顯現;我從以色列眾支派中揀選你父的家歸我,在祭司的職分上事奉我」(撒母耳記上二章二十七至二十八節)。又過一些經文:「你為何用貪婪的眼看我的香與我的祭物?尊重你的兒子過於尊重我,使你們從起初在我面前一切祭物上把肥美的歸給自己呢?現在耶和華如此說:尊重我的,我必尊重他;」
For even that priest Eli at Shiloh, because he had not avenged with worthy zeal for God and with severity his sons who despised God, but had admonished them softly and gently, as it were with a father's affection, is condemned with such a sentence, the prophet saying to him: 'I plainly revealed myself to the house of thy father, when they were in Egypt serving Pharaoh; and I chose the house of thy father out of all the tribes of Israel to be mine in the priesthood' (1 Samuel 2:27-28). And a little after: 'Why hast thou looked upon my incense and upon my sacrifice with a greedy eye? and hast honoured thy sons more than me, that thou shouldst bless them from the beginning in all the sacrifices before me? And now thus saith the Lord: Those who honour me, I will honour;'
5:36
et qui pro nihilo habent me, ad nihilum redigentur. Et hoc tibi signum sit, quod veniet super duos filios tuos Ophni et Phinees; in uno die morientur ambo in gladio virorum (Ib. d., 29, 31, 34). Si hæc itaque patiuntur, qui verbis tantum subjectos, et non condigna ultione cmendant; quid ipsis fiet qui ad mala hortantur peccando et trahunt ? Quid illi quoque perspicuum est vero vati, post expletionem signi ab eodem prædicti, et restitutionem aridae manus impio regi, misso a Judaea prophetare in Bethel, prohibitoque nc quid ibidem cibi gustaret, ac decepto ab alio (ut dicebatur) propheta, ut parum quid panis et aquæ sumeret, obtigit, dicente ad eum suo hospite: Hæc dicit Dominus Deus:
「藐視我的,必被輕視。這要給你作為記號,臨到你兩個兒子何弗尼和非尼哈身上;他們二人必在一日同被人用刀殺死」(撒母耳記上二章三十、三十一、三十四節)。那麼,若那些只用言語管教所轄之人、卻不施以相稱刑罰的尚且遭受這些事,那些自己犯罪、又慫恿並拉人去行惡的,又將如何呢?那真先知的遭遇也是顯然的——在他所預言的記號應驗、那枯乾的手向不敬虔的王得了復原之後,他奉差從猶大去伯特利說預言,並被禁止在那裏嘗任何食物,卻被另一位(據說是)先知欺哄,吃了一點餅、喝了一點水。他的東道對他說:「耶和華神如此說:」
'and those who despise me shall be brought to nothing. And this shall be a sign to thee, which shall come upon thy two sons Hophni and Phinehas; in one day they shall both die by the sword of men' (1 Samuel 2:30, 31, 34). If, then, those suffer these things who correct their subjects with words only, and not with worthy punishment, what shall happen to those very men who by sinning urge others to evil and drag them with them? What befell that true seer also is plain — after the fulfilment of the sign foretold by him, and the restoring of the withered hand to the impious king — who, sent from Judah to prophesy in Bethel and forbidden to taste any food there, and deceived by another (as it was said) prophet into taking a little bread and water, had this said to him by his host: 'Thus saith the Lord God:'
5:37
Quia inobedicns fuisti ori Domini, et non C custodisti mandatum quod præcepit Dominus Deus tuus, et reversus ea, et comedisti panem, et bibisti aquam in hoc loco in quo mandaveram tibi ne manducares panem nec biberes, aquam, non ponetur corpus tuum in sepulcro patrum tuorum. Et factum est, inquit, postquam manducavit panem et bibit aquam, stravit sibi asinam suam et abiit: et invenit eum leo in via, et occidit eum (III Reg. XIII, 21-24). CAP. IX. Ex Isaia. — lsaiam quoque sanctum prophetam de sacerdotibus hoc modo loquentem audite: Væ impio in malum; relributio enim manuum ejus fiet ei. Populum meum exactores sui spoliaverunt, et mulieres dominatæ sunt ejus.
「因你違背了耶和華的口,沒有遵守耶和華你神所吩咐你的命令,竟回來在這地方吃了餅、喝了水,就是祂吩咐你不可吃餅、不可喝水之地,你的屍體必不得葬入你列祖的墳墓。」經上說,這人吃了餅、喝了水之後,就為自己備上驢起身走了;路上有獅子遇見他,把他咬死了(列王紀上十三章二十一至二十四節)。第九章 出自以賽亞。——也要聽聖先知以賽亞如此論到祭司:「禍哉,惡人遭難;因他手所行的必報應在他身上。至於我的百姓,欺壓他們的勒索他們,婦女轄管他們。」
'Because thou hast been disobedient to the mouth of the Lord, and hast not kept the commandment which the Lord thy God commanded thee, and hast turned back, and hast eaten bread and drunk water in this place, in which I had commanded thee that thou shouldst eat no bread nor drink water, thy body shall not be laid in the sepulchre of thy fathers. And it came to pass,' he says, 'after he had eaten bread and drunk water, he saddled his ass for himself and departed: and a lion found him in the way, and slew him' (1 Kings 13:21-24). CHAPTER 9. From Isaiah. — Hear also the holy prophet Isaiah speaking thus concerning priests: 'Woe to the wicked unto evil; for the recompense of his hands shall be done to him. As for my people, their exactors have spoiled them, and women have ruled over them.'
5:38
Popule meus, qui beatum te dicunt, ipsi te decipiunt, et viam gressuum tuorum dissipant. Stat ad judicandum Dominus, et stat ad judicandos populos. Dominus ad judicium veniet cum senibus populi sui et principibus ejus. Vos depasti estis vineam meam: rapina pauperis in domo vestra. Quare atteritis populum meum, et facies pauperum sommolitis, dicit Dominus exercituum (Isa. III, 11-15) ? Et item: Væ qui condunt leges iniquus, et scribentes injustitiam scripserunt, ut opprimerent in judicio pauperes, et vim facerent causæ humilium populi mei, ut essent viduæ præda eorum, et pupillos diriperent. Quid facietis in die visitationis et calamitatis de longe venientis (Isa. x, 1-3)? Et infra:
「我的百姓啊,那些稱你為有福的,他們欺哄你,且毀壞你所行之道。耶和華起來辯論,站著審判眾民。耶和華必與祂百姓中的長老和首領一同進入審判。你們吞吃了我的葡萄園,搶奪窮人之物積在你們家中。你們為何壓制我的百姓,搓磨貧窮人的臉呢?這是萬軍之耶和華說的」(以賽亞書三章十一至十五節)。又說:「禍哉,那些設立不義之律例、把不公之事寫成文書的人,為要欺壓我民中困苦的人在審判中失去公道,奪去貧寒人的權利,使寡婦作他們的擄物,搶奪孤兒。到降罰之日、災禍從遠處臨到之時,你們將怎樣行呢?」(以賽亞書十章一至三節)。下文又說:「
'O my people, those who call thee blessed, they deceive thee, and destroy the way of thy steps. The Lord standeth up to judge, and standeth to judge the peoples. The Lord will come to judgment with the elders of his people and with its princes. Ye have eaten up my vineyard: the spoil of the poor is in your house. Why do ye wear away my people, and grind the faces of the poor? saith the Lord of hosts' (Isaiah 3:11-15). And again: 'Woe to those who frame iniquitous laws, and who writing have written down injustice, to oppress the poor in judgment, and to do violence to the cause of the humble of my people, that widows might be their prey, and that they might plunder the fatherless. What will ye do in the day of visitation and of calamity coming from afar?' (Isaiah 10:1-3). And below:
下一段 →
← 第 4 章
12345

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。