📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 默示錄與保羅書信註

默示錄與保羅書信註 第 19 章 第 1/5 段

拉丁文原文.37 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 19:1–19:37(全章共 166 節)

← 第 18 章第 20 章 →
下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
19:1
I. Libri signati signis septem dignitas, acceptio patefacti memoratur et visio. II. Primo signo, equi albi narratur inspectio. III. Secundo equus rufus, et niger tertio memoratur. iV. Equum quarto signo pallentem. V. Quinto signo sub altare Dei animas occisorum. VI. Terræmotus, solis obscuritas in sanguine lumine converso a, stellasque casuras. VII. Quatuor angeli tenere quatuor terræ angulos perhibentur. VIII. Numerus signatorum de singulis tribubus memorantur. IX. Ventura ex gentibus prædicatur innumerabilis multitudo. X. Agnus qui in medio throni eat, reget eos. Legem De!
一、記載那用七印封住之書卷的尊貴、其開啟時的領受,以及那異象。二、在第一印,述說看見一匹白馬。三、在第二印,記載一匹紅馬;第三印記載一匹黑馬。四、在第四印,一匹灰白色的馬。五、在第五印,在神壇之下,被殺之人的靈魂。六、地震、日頭變黑、其光變為血、眾星將要墜落。七、四位天使據說握住地的四角。八、記載各支派中受印之人的數目。九、預言將有從萬民而來、不可勝數的群眾。十、那在寶座中間的羔羊,必牧養他們。神的律法。
1. The dignity of the book sealed with seven seals, its reception when opened, is recorded, and the vision. 2. At the first seal, the sight of a white horse is related. 3. At the second, a red horse; and at the third, a black one is recorded. 4. At the fourth seal, a pale horse. 5. At the fifth seal, beneath the altar of God, the souls of the slain. 6. Earthquake, the darkening of the sun, its light turned to blood, and the stars about to fall. 7. Four angels are said to hold the four corners of the earth. 8. The number of the sealed out of each tribe is recorded. 9. An innumerable multitude to come from the nations is foretold. 10. The Lamb, who is in the midst of the throne, shall rule them. The law of God.
19:2
posse tribus modis intelligi etiam multiplieiter, recta duntaxat expositione cognosci, ejus'dem testimoniis perdocetor; sicut enim in Salomone legimus (Prov. VII): Scribe ea tibi tripliciter; ita in libro Job (Cap. XI) scriptum meminimus: Atque utinam Dens loqueretur tecum, et ostenderet tibi secreta sapientiae, et quod multiplex esset lex ejus I Verum quia uno spiritu probata sibi adversari nullatenus possunt, probabili ratione utrumque constare facile demonstratur. Hoc tantum est principali sollicitudine conservandum, ut sacris voluminibus exponendis illos sensus adhibere curemus, qui net ab ipsorum locorum veritate resiliant:
可以用三種方式理解,甚至以多重方式理解,雖然唯有藉正確的解釋才能認識;這是由它自己的見證所充分教導的。因為正如我們在所羅門書中所讀的(箴言七章[廿二章20節]):「你要為自己以三重方式記錄這些事」;照樣,在約伯記(十一章)我們記得寫著:「惟願神與你說話,將智慧的奧祕指示你,叫你知道他的律法是多重的!」但既然被同一位聖靈所印證的事斷不能彼此矛盾,便可憑合理的推論輕易證明二者皆能成立。惟有這一點必須極其謹慎地持守,就是在解釋聖經卷冊時,我們要留意採用那些既不背離經文本身真理的意義:
can be understood in three ways, and even in manifold ways, though it is to be known only by a right exposition; this is fully taught by its own testimonies. For as we read in Solomon (Prov. 7 [22:20]): Write these things for yourself in a threefold manner; so in the book of Job (ch. 11) we remember it is written: And would that God might speak with you, and show you the secrets of wisdom, and that his law is manifold! But since things proved by one Spirit can in no way contradict one another, it is easily demonstrated by probable reasoning that both hold good. This alone must be preserved with chief care, that in expounding the sacred volumes we take heed to apply those meanings which neither recoil from the truth of the passages themselves:
19:3
quin potius auctoris animum intentione sobria penetrantes, salubriter proferant, et qui fidei regulis coaptati, consona semper veritati respondeant. Neque enim et illud sibi contrarium videri putandum est, quod cum Spiritus Dei legatiter insinuetur (Sap. vn) unicus vel simplex, mox perhibetur etiam multimodus vel multiplex, sicut 'se translationum diversitas habet. Simplex utique singulari proprietate naturae, multiplex distributionibus gratiae; vel tum tribus modis legatur peccatorum remissio celebrari, baptismate, pœnitudine atque martyrio, juxta psalmum, quod canimus (Psal. XXXI): Beati quorum remissae sunt iniquitates, et quorum tecta sunt peccata;
卻反而要以清醒的用意深入作者的心意,帶出有益的意義,並且這些意義既與信仰的準則相符,便始終與真理和諧一致地回應。因為也不當認為這自相矛盾:聖經一面合宜地將神的靈稱為(智慧書七章)獨一或單純的,一面又隨即宣稱他也是多重或多樣的,正如各譯本的差異所示。他按其本性獨一的特質是單純的,按恩典的分賜是多重的;又照樣,罪的赦免據載以三種方式成就:藉洗禮、藉悔改、藉殉道,正如我們所唱的詩篇(詩篇三十一篇[卅二篇]):「得赦免其過、遮蓋其罪的,這人是有福的;」
but rather, penetrating the mind of the author with sober intention, may bring forth wholesome meanings, and which, being fitted to the rules of faith, always answer in harmony with the truth. For neither is this to be thought self-contradictory, that while the Spirit of God is lawfully described (Wisd. 7) as single or simple, he is presently declared also to be manifold or multiple, as the diversity of translations has it. Simple indeed by the singular property of his nature, manifold by the distributions of grace; or, likewise, the remission of sins is read to be accomplished in three ways: by baptism, by penitence, and by martyrdom, according to the psalm which we sing (Ps. 31 [32]): Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;
19:4
bcatus vir cui non imputavit Dominus peccatum, ut baptismo remitti, pænitentia tegi, martyrio non imputari credantur. Alii tamen Patres septem modis dixerunt relaxari, addentes eleemosynas debitae remissionis acquisitioni, proximi ab errore cohibiti, et abundantiam charitatis, per quam cooperiri abundantiam legimus peccatorum (Prov. x). Possunt autem intra illos tres modos isti quoque comprehensi manere, qui latius clareant expediti. Quorsum ista præmiserim, sequentis mox lectionis docebit excursus; exponendis namque locis arduis properantes nolumus aut temeritatis progressu notari, aut paternae traditionis obliviosi ab aliquo judican. CAP. v.
主不算為有罪的,這人是有福的:如此,人可相信罪藉洗禮得赦免,藉悔改得遮蓋,藉殉道不被算為有罪。然而別的教父說罪以七種方式得赦,又加上施捨作為債務赦免的獲取之途、使鄰舍脫離錯謬,以及愛心的豐盛——我們讀到藉此愛便遮蓋許多的罪(箴言十章)。但這些也都能包含在那三種方式之內,並且經闡明後可更廣泛地顯明。我為何先講這些,下一段閱讀的進程隨即會顯示;因為我們既急於解釋艱難的經文,便不願被指為魯莽躁進,也不願因忘記教父的傳承而被人論斷。第五章。
blessed is the man to whom the Lord has not imputed sin: so that they may be believed to be remitted by baptism, covered by penitence, not imputed by martyrdom. Yet other Fathers said that they are loosed in seven ways, adding almsgiving to the acquiring of the debt's remission, a neighbour restrained from error, and the abundance of charity, through which we read that an abundance of sins is covered over (Prov. 10). But these too can remain comprised within those three ways, and, being set forth, may shine forth more broadly. To what end I have set down these things, the course of the next reading will presently show; for hastening to expound difficult passages, we would not be marked for a rash advance, nor, forgetful of the paternal tradition, be judged by anyone. Chapter 5.
19:5
Et vidi librum in dextera Dei sedentis super thronum, scriptum intus et foris, signatum signis septem. In dextra, in Christo dicit, ipse est enim brachium Dei, ipse dextera Patris; sive in summa beatitudine. Librum scriptum intus et foris, utrumque Testamentum. A foris, Vetus quod videbatur; ab intus, Novum quod intra Vetus latebat. Hinc ApostoIus Hebræos alloquitur, dicens (Heb. XII); Non enim accessistis ad tractabilem ignem et turbinem et caliginem, et procellam, et tubæ sonum, et vocem verborum: quam qui audierunt, excusaverunt se, ne eis fieret verbum; non enim portabant quod dicebatur, etc.
我看見坐在寶座上那位神的右手中有一卷書,裡外都寫著字,用七印封住。「在右手中」——他是指在基督裡,因為基督是神的膀臂,是父的右手;或指在至高的福樂中。一卷裡外都寫著字的書:就是新舊兩約。外面是被看見的舊約;裡面是隱藏在舊約之內的新約。因此使徒對希伯來人說(希伯來書十二章):「你們原不是來到那能摸的火、旋風、黑暗、暴風、號筒的聲音,與說話的聲音;那些聽見這聲音的,都求不要再向他們說話;因為他們當不起所命他們的話,」等等。
And I saw in the right hand of God who sat upon the throne a book written within and without, sealed with seven seals. 'In the right hand'—he means in Christ, for he is the arm of God, he is the right hand of the Father; or in the highest blessedness. A book written within and without: both Testaments. Without, the Old, which was seen; within, the New, which lay hidden within the Old. Hence the Apostle addresses the Hebrews, saying (Heb. 12): For you are not come to a fire that may be touched, and a whirlwind, and darkness, and storm, and the sound of a trumpet, and the voice of words, which they that heard excused themselves, that the word might not be spoken to them; for they could not bear that which was said, etc.
19:6
Nunc autem spiritalibus spiritalia comparantes, non contemplamur quæ videntur, sed quae non videntur: quae enim videntur, temporalia sunt; quæ autem non videntur, aeterna. Propterea autem unus liber dicitur, quia nec Novum sine Vetere, nec Vetus sine Novo. Nam Vetus nuntius est et velamen Novi, et Novum adimpletio et revelatio Veteris; quia et Vetus quamvis a foris esset, non totum apparebat, non totum latebat. Vel, ut clarius exprimatur, omnil dispensatio Salvatoris, libri hic nomine frequentatur, quæ in utroque Testamento vel promissa legitur, vel peracta. Signatum signis septem, muhifaria mysteriorum latitantium plenitudine tectum, inde et a monte umbroso et condenso.
但如今,我們將屬靈的話解釋屬靈的事,原不是顧念所見的,乃是顧念所不見的;因為所見的是暫時的,所不見的是永遠的。它之所以被稱為一卷書,是因為新約離不開舊約,舊約也離不開新約。因為舊約是新約的先聲與帕子,新約是舊約的成全與啟示;因為舊約雖在外面,卻既非全然顯現,也非全然隱藏。或說得更清楚些,救主的整個救贖安排在此常以「書」之名來表達,這安排在新舊兩約中或被讀為應許,或被讀為成就。用七印封住:即被隱藏奧祕的多重豐盛所遮蓋,因此也被稱為蔭密濃鬱之山。
But now, comparing spiritual things with spiritual, we look not on the things which are seen, but on the things which are not seen; for the things which are seen are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal. And it is called one book for this reason, because neither is the New without the Old, nor the Old without the New. For the Old is the herald and the veil of the New, and the New is the fulfilment and revelation of the Old; because the Old also, although it was without, did not wholly appear, did not wholly lie hidden. Or, to express it more clearly, the whole dispensation of the Saviour is here often signified by the name of the book, which is read in both Testaments as either promised or accomplished. Sealed with seven seals: covered with the manifold fullness of hidden mysteries, whence it is also called a shady and dense mountain.
19:7
Et licet septenarius numerus universitatem sollicite complectatur, arbitror tamen septem modos tanquam septem signa in Scripturis divinis exercitiis palam debere quaeri, et pro se necessario reperiri non tantum proloquiorum, quos etiam mundani auctores in suis dictionibus regulariter Deo revelante animadvertere potuerunt, sed etiam intelligentiae salutaris, qui soli speeialiter Christo reserandæ dicuntur mansisse repositi. Quandiu enim aquam in illis sex hydriis tanquam sex ætatibus idem Dominus convertisset in vinum, id est, Vetus Testamentum intelligendum spiritaliter perdoceret, nec cbriare fervore spiritus lex quemquam poterat. Et illa signa clausa hactenus permanebant:
雖然「七」這數目謹慎地包羅了普遍全體,我卻認為,在研讀聖經的操練中,應當公開尋求七種方式,如同七印,並且為此必然可以尋見——不僅是言說的模式(這些連世俗作者藉神啟示也能在他們的文辭中有規律地察覺),更是那使人得救的悟性,唯獨這悟性據說被存留起來,專為基督開啟。因為只要那同一位主還未把那六口水缸(如同六個時代)中的水變為酒——就是還未充分教導人當按屬靈的意義理解舊約——律法就不能以聖靈的火熱使任何人陶醉。那些印直到當時仍舊封閉著:
And although the number seven carefully embraces universality, yet I think that seven ways, as it were seven seals, ought to be openly sought in the exercises of the divine Scriptures, and are necessarily to be found for their sake—not only of the modes of speech, which even worldly authors were able to observe regularly in their diction, God revealing it, but also of the saving understanding, which alone are said to have remained laid up, to be unlocked specially for Christ. For as long as the same Lord had not turned the water in those six waterpots, as it were the six ages, into wine—that is, had not fully taught that the Old Testament is to be understood spiritually—the law could inebriate no one with the fervour of the Spirit. And those seals hitherto remained closed:
19:8
quocirca sacris diligenter paginis perscrutatis, septem primum modis locutionis videmus facile comprehendi, id est indicativum, pronuntiativum, imperativum, optativum, conjunctivum, infinitivum et impersonalem, ut, verbi gratia, indicativum sit in eo quod legimus (Mich. VI): Indicabo tibi, homo, quid sit bonum, et quid Dominus quaerat a te, utique diligere judicium et facere misericordiam, et sollicitum ambulare cum Deo tuo. Et, Ego Dominus Deus tuus docens te utilia, gubernans te in via qua ambulas (Isa. XLVIII). Itemque cum quæritur: Quis est iste venit de Edon, tinclis vestitus de Bosra (Isa. LXIII)? indicando respondetur:
因此,當聖經各頁被殷勤查考時,我們看見首先可以輕易領會七種言說的模式,就是:直陳語氣、宣告語氣、命令語氣、祈願語氣、假設語氣、不定式,以及無人稱語氣。舉例來說,直陳語氣見於我們所讀的(彌迦書六章):「世人哪,我要指示你何為善,耶和華向你所要的是什麼;無非是要你行公義、好憐憫、存謙卑的心與你的神同行。」又如:「我是耶和華你的神,教訓你使你得益處,引導你所當行的路」(以賽亞書四十八章)。同樣,當有人問:「這從以東的波斯拉來、穿紅衣服的是誰呢?」(以賽亞書六十三章)便以指明的方式回答:
wherefore, when the sacred pages have been diligently searched, we see that seven modes of expression can readily be comprehended first, that is, the indicative, the declarative, the imperative, the optative, the subjunctive, the infinitive, and the impersonal. So that, for example, there is the indicative in that which we read (Micah 6): I will show you, O man, what is good, and what the Lord requires of you: namely, to love judgment, and to do mercy, and to walk solicitously with your God. And, I am the Lord your God who teaches you profitable things, who governs you in the way in which you walk (Isa. 48). And likewise, when it is asked: Who is this that comes from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah (Isa. 63)? it is answered by way of indicating:
19:9
Ego qui loquor justitiam, et propugnator sum ad salvandum (Ibidem). Pronuntiativus, Audi me, Jacob, et Israel, quem ego voco, ego primus et ego novissimus, et absque me non est Deus (Isa. XLVIII). Itemque: Quare dicis, Jacob, et loqueris, Israel: Abscondita via mea a Domino, et a Deo meo judicium meum transiit? Nunquid nescis aut non audisti: Deus sempiternus Dominus, qui creavit terminos terræ, non deficiet neque laborabit, nec est investigatio sapientiæ ejus, qui dat lasso virtutem (Isa. XL). Vel, Ecce dies venient, dicit Dominiis, et consummabo super domum Israel et super domum Juda Testamentum Novum (Jerem. XXI). Imperativus, Non accipies nomen Domini Dei tui in vanum;
「就是我,是憑公義說話、以大能施行拯救的」(同上)。宣告語氣:「雅各啊,我所揀選的以色列啊,當聽我言;我是首先的,我是末後的,除我以外再沒有神」(以賽亞書四十八章)。同樣:「雅各啊,你為何說,以色列啊,你為何言:我的道路向耶和華隱藏,我的冤屈神並不查問?你豈不曾知道嗎?豈不曾聽見嗎?耶和華是永在的神,創造地極的主,他並不疲乏,也不困倦;他的智慧無法測度,他賜能力給疲乏的人」(以賽亞書四十章)。或說:「看哪,日子將到,耶和華說,我要與以色列家和猶大家另立新約」(耶利米書卅一章)。命令語氣:「不可妄稱耶和華你神的名;」
It is I who speak justice, and am a defender to save (ibid.). The declarative: Hear me, O Jacob, and Israel, whom I call; I am the first, and I am the last, and besides me there is no God (Isa. 48). And likewise: Why do you say, O Jacob, and speak, O Israel: My way is hidden from the Lord, and my judgment is passed over from my God? Do you not know, or have you not heard: the Lord is the everlasting God, who created the ends of the earth; he shall not faint, nor labour, neither is there any searching out of his wisdom, who gives strength to the weary (Isa. 40). Or, Behold, the days come, says the Lord, and I will accomplish over the house of Israel and over the house of Judah a New Testament (Jer. 31). The imperative: You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain;
19:10
et, Non habebis deos alienos praeter me (Exod. xx), vel his similia. Et, Clama, ne cesses, quasi tuba exalia vocem (Isa. LVIII). Optativus, Utinam attendisses mandata mea, et facta fuisset sicut lumen pax tua, et justitia tua sicut gurgites maris (Isa. XLVIII); et, Utinam dirigantur viae meæ ad custodiendas justificationes tuas (Psal. CXVIII); et: Quis dabit mib: pennas sicut columbae, et volabo et requiescam (Psal. LVIII)? Conjunctivus, Si audieritis vocem meam, et custodieritis pactum meum, eritis mihi in peculium de cunctis populis; mea est enim omnis terra, et vos eritis mihi regnum sacerdotale et gens sancta (Exod. XIX). Alibi quoque:
又,「除我以外,你不可有別的神」(出埃及記二十章),或類似的話。又,「你要大聲喊叫,不要止息,揚起聲來好像吹角」(以賽亞書五十八章)。祈願語氣:「甚願你留意我的命令,你的平安就如光,你的公義就如海浪」(以賽亞書四十八章);又,「甚願我行事堅定,得以遵守你的律例」(詩篇一百一十八篇[一百一十九篇]);又:「誰能給我像鴿子的翅膀,我就飛去得享安息」(詩篇五十四篇[五十五篇])?假設語氣:「你們若實在聽從我的話,遵守我的約,就要在萬民中作屬我的子民;因為全地都是我的,你們要歸我作祭司的國度,為聖潔的國民」(出埃及記十九章)。別處也說:
and, You shall not have strange gods before me (Exod. 20), or the like. And, Cry aloud, cease not, lift up your voice like a trumpet (Isa. 58). The optative: Would that you had attended to my commandments, and your peace had been made as light, and your justice as the waves of the sea (Isa. 48); and, Would that my ways were directed to keep your justifications (Ps. 118 [119]); and: Who will give me wings like a dove, and I will fly and be at rest (Ps. 54 [55])? The subjunctive: If you will hear my voice, and keep my covenant, you shall be to me a peculiar possession above all peoples; for all the earth is mine, and you shall be to me a priestly kingdom and a holy nation (Exod. 19). Elsewhere also:
19:11
Habitabo in illis et inambulabo, et ero illorum Deus, et ipsi erunt mihi populus (Lev. XXVI). Vel, Si stetissent in substantia mea, utique avertissem eos a pessimis cogitationibus suis (Jerem. XXIII). Infinitivus porro modus, qui et in ordine sextus est: Scire et intelligere Dominum, et facere judidum et justitiam in medio terræ (Jerem. IX). Itemque, Continere a malo, intelligentia (Mich. vi). Impersonalis, Quis adjuvit spiritum Domini? cum quo iniit consilium, et instruxit eum, et docuit eum semilam justitiae, et viam prudentiae ostendit illi (Job XXVIII)? Vel in hoc quod est scriptum: Quis est in vobis qui audiat hoc, attendat et auscultet futura (Isa. XL)?
「我要在他們中間居住,行走;我要作他們的神,他們要作我的子民」(利未記廿六章)。或,「他們若是站在我的謀略中,我必使他們回頭離開他們的惡念」(耶利米書廿三章)。至於不定式,它在次序上也是第六:「認識、明白耶和華,並在地上施行公義與公平」(耶利米書九章)。同樣,「遠離惡事就是聰明」(彌迦書六章)。無人稱語氣:「誰曾幫助耶和華的靈?或與他商議,指教他,將公平的路教訓他,將智慧的道指示他呢?」(約伯記廿八章)或如所寫的:「你們中間誰肯聽這話,誰肯留心聽將來的事呢?」(以賽亞書四十章)
I will dwell in them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people (Lev. 26). Or, If they had stood in my counsel, I would surely have turned them from their evil thoughts (Jer. 23). The infinitive mode, moreover, which is also sixth in order: To know and understand the Lord, and to do judgment and justice in the midst of the earth (Jer. 9). And likewise, To refrain from evil is understanding (Micah 6). The impersonal: Who has aided the Spirit of the Lord? or with whom has he taken counsel, and who has instructed him, and taught him the path of justice, and shown him the way of prudence (Job 28)? Or in this which is written: Who is there among you that will hear this, attend and hearken to things to come (Isa. 40)?
19:12
Et, Quis est homo qui timet Dominum, legem statuit ei in via quam elegit (Psal. XXIV)? Vel, Intelligere legem, sensus est optimi; et, Quis loquitur potentias Domini (Psal, cv)? et cætera his similia, quæ singulis poterunt modis congruenter copiosius applicari. Haec, inquam, verbis facile reperimus; hoc autem nunc justus ordo deposcit, ut in ipsis proprie rebus tanquam septem signis regulares intelligentiæ formas congruis testimoniis coaptemus, vel ipsa potius testimonia eisdem regulis servire pro. babiliter doceamus. Praemissos enim locutionis modos, etsi congruum utcunque videtur, ad illud tamen quod quærimus, exiguum judicatur. Ideo namque Ii..
又,「誰敬畏耶和華,耶和華必指示他當選擇的道路」(詩篇廿四篇[廿五篇])?或說,「明白律法乃是至善的悟性」;又,「誰能傳說耶和華的大能呢?」(詩篇一百零五篇[一百零六篇])?以及其他類似的話,都能貼切且更豐富地應用於各樣的模式。我說,這些我們在言詞中輕易可尋;但如今正當的次序要求我們:在那些實在的事物本身之中,如同在七印之中,將悟性的規範形式配合適切的見證,或說得更貼切些,證明這些見證確能服從那些規則。因為前述那些言說的模式,雖看似多少相稱,但就我們所尋求的而論,卻被判為微小。正因如此,這卷書……
And, Who is the man that fears the Lord? He appoints him a law in the way that he has chosen (Ps. 24 [25])? Or, To understand the law is the sense of the best; and, Who shall utter the mighty acts of the Lord (Ps. 105 [106])? and other things like these, which can be fittingly and more copiously applied to the several modes. These things, I say, we readily find in the words; but now just order demands this, that in the very realities themselves, as it were in seven seals, we fit the regular forms of understanding to congruous testimonies, or rather teach probably that these testimonies serve those same rules. For the aforesaid modes of speech, although they seem somehow congruous, yet with respect to what we seek are judged slight. For this reason indeed the book...
19:13
brum signatum signis septem dicit, quia secretus a!. tius [alius] modus, qui ibidem ante latuisse, ipsius autem Christi dispensatione asserit patuisse, admonet indicandus. Inquirentibus itaque nobis Scripturam primus historiae actionis textus occurrit, secundus allegoriae gestus; tertius, utriusque modus agnoscitur; quartus de incommutabili divinae Trinitatis essentia, quando proprie, quando tropice sacris insinuetur oraculis; quintus parabolarum, quia tam relatu quam actu conficitur, ut quando aliud dicitur, et scripto aliud invenitur, ad pastum spiritalis intelligentiae animuserigatur;
……被稱為用七印封住的書,因為另有一種更隱祕的模式——它斷言這模式先前藏在其中,卻藉基督自己的救贖安排被開啟了——警戒說必須把它指明出來。因此,當我們查考聖經時,首先遇見的是歷史行動的字面經文;第二是寓意的樣式;第三是二者兼具的模式;第四關乎神聖三位一體那不變的本質,即聖言何時按本義、何時按象徵地啟示於神聖的默示中;第五是比喻的模式,因為它既由敘述也由行動構成,以致當所說的是一事、經文所載的又是另一事時,人的心思可被提升到屬靈悟性的糧食;
...is said to be a book sealed with seven seals, because another, more secret mode—which it asserts lay hidden there before, but was laid open by the very dispensation of Christ—warns that it must be pointed out. As we search the Scripture, then, the first thing to meet us is the text of historical action; the second, the manner of allegory; the third, the mode of both is recognized; the fourth, concerning the unchangeable essence of the divine Trinity, when it is properly, when figuratively, insinuated by the sacred oracles; the fifth, of parables, because it is made up as much of narration as of action, so that when one thing is said and another is found in the writing, the mind may be raised to the food of spiritual understanding;
19:14
sextus de gemino Salvatoris adventu, vel ad eos pertinentia (sic), ne aut primus pro secundo, aut secundus inteUigatur pro primo, ubi grandi intentione regula discretionis est adhibenda. Hinc enim et Judaeorum mentes adveniente Domino caligabant, et nunc usque eadem ignorantiae coecitate laborant, intantum ut nonnunquam de ipsis quoque peccatis hominum et transgressionibus aliquorum prophetia prætendatur operum futurorum, aut secreta spiritalium sensuum.
第六關乎救主的二次降臨,或與此相關的事,免得或把頭一次當作第二次,或把第二次當作頭一次來理解——在此必須極其專注地運用分辨的準則。因為正是為此,猶太人的心在主降臨時昏暗了,直到如今他們仍在同樣無知的瞎眼中掙扎,以致有時甚至從人的罪過和某些人的過犯之中,竟預表出將來作為的預言,或屬靈意義的隱祕。
the sixth, concerning the twofold coming of the Saviour, or the things pertaining to them, lest either the first be understood for the second, or the second for the first—where the rule of discretion must be applied with great attention. For hence the minds of the Jews were darkened at the Lord's coming, and even now they labour under the same blindness of ignorance, so far that sometimes even from the very sins of men and the transgressions of certain persons there is put forth a prophecy of works to come, or of the secret meanings of spiritual things.
19:15
Ille porro modus, id est, septimus, quo sic divinis præceptis instruimur, ut certa vitae agendae forma, aliis vero vitæ significande flgura regulariter innotescat, sollicita intentione tractandus est, in his et quid foris scriptum, et quid intus sit discrete cognoscitur. Sed jam exemplis praefatos modos nos convenit docere. Historicus idem qui primus est, indicat nobis unum Deum esse hoc modo: Audi, Israel, Dominus Deus tuus Deus unus est (Deut. IX), et quod ab ipso facta sint omnia, vel his similia. Secundus allegoriae, ut est illud, quod Abraham servum suum tanquam novo et insolito obtinet juramento, dicens: Miite manum tuam subter femur meum, et jura mihi per Dominum Deum cæli (Gen.
再者,那第七種模式——就是我們藉神聖的命令受教,以致所當度的生活有確定的規範可循,而對別人卻成為表明生命的預像——必須以謹慎的專注來處理;在這些之中,可分辨地認出何為外面所寫的,何為裡面的。但如今我們該用實例來教導前述的各種模式。歷史模式(即第一種)以這樣的方式向我們指明神是獨一的:「以色列啊,你要聽,耶和華我們神是獨一的主」(申命記六章),並指明萬物都是他所造的,或類似的話。第二種是寓意模式,如亞伯拉罕以一種新奇不尋常的誓言向他僕人所要求的,說:「請你把手放在我大腿底下,我要叫你指著天上的主神起誓」(創世記
That mode, moreover, that is, the seventh, whereby we are so instructed by the divine precepts that a fixed form of the life to be lived becomes regularly known, but to others a figure signifying life, must be handled with careful attention; in these it is discreetly recognized both what is written without and what is within. But now it is fitting that we teach the aforesaid modes by examples. The historical, which is the first, indicates to us that God is one, in this manner: Hear, O Israel, the Lord your God is one God (Deut. 6), and that all things were made by him, or the like. The second, of allegory, as is that which Abraham exacts of his servant by a new and unusual oath, saying: Put your hand under my thigh, and swear to me by the Lord God of heaven (Gen.
19:16
XXIV). Quod ideo figuratum agnoscitur, quod non usu omnium generaliter frequentatur, nisi Abraham et Jacob propheticis specialiter patriarchis, de quorum femore Christus speraretur corporahter nasciturus. Nam quod ex omnibus fidelibus Israel puella regi David quæritur, et invenitur tam fervens, ut algentis membra senis congruo fovens calore mulceret (111 Reg. I), tam casta, ut calefactum ad libidinem non provocaret; vel quod populus in eremo ignitis serpentibus flagellatus, aenei conspectionc serpentis a serpentium morsu liberavit (Num. XXI); typice mutavit David vultum suum co ram Abimelech, et dimisit eum et abiit; cum in Iibro Regum (/, cap.
廿四章)。這被認出是象徵性的,原因是它並非人人普遍施行的,惟獨亞伯拉罕與雅各這兩位特具先知性的族長如此,因為指望基督要按肉身從他們的腰而生。至於這事:從以色列眾信徒中為大衛王尋找一位童女,並找到一位如此溫暖的,以合宜的熱氣撫慰那年邁寒冷之人的肢體,使他得安撫(列王紀上一章),又如此貞潔,以致他雖被暖熱卻未被激動情慾;或那百姓在曠野被火蛇所擊,藉觀看一條銅蛇而脫離蛇的咬傷(民數記廿一章):大衛在亞比米勒面前預表性地改變了面貌,亞比米勒就打發他去,他便離開了;然而在列王紀(上,
24). This is recognized as figurative for the reason that it is not commonly practised by all in general, save only by Abraham and Jacob, the specially prophetic patriarchs, from whose loins Christ was hoped to be born bodily. For as to the fact that from among all the faithful of Israel a maiden is sought for king David, and one is found so warm that, cherishing with fitting heat the limbs of the aged, cold man, she soothed them (III [I] Kings 1), yet so chaste that she did not provoke him warmed to lust; or that the people, scourged in the desert by fiery serpents, was delivered from the serpents' bite by the sight of a bronze serpent (Num. 21): typically David changed his countenance before Abimelech, and he sent him away, and he departed; whereas in the book of Kings (I, ch.
19:17
xxi) coram Achis rege David vultum suum mutasse legatur, quando tympanizans ad ostia civitatis, propriumque corpus suis manibus portans, et salivam super barbam suam decurrere faciens, vel caetera more insanientis exercens, typum dominicae passionis expressit. Cum ergo mutatur nomine pro AcUis Abimelech, legentem admonuit ex ipsis interpretationum nominibus, latens altius penetrare mysterium. Abimelech enim interpretatum, dicitur patris mei regnum. Tunc ergo Dei Filius Jesus Christus coram regno Patris sui, id est coram Judæis, vultum suum commutavit, quando in forma servi humilis veniens, factusque obediens usque ad mortem crucis (Philip.
廿一章)所讀的是大衛在亞吉王面前改變面貌,當時他在城門上擊鼓,用自己的手托著自己的身體,讓唾沫流到鬍鬚上,或按瘋人的樣式作其餘的事,藉此表達了主受難的預表。既然名字有所更改,以亞比米勒代替亞吉,這便從名字本身的解釋提醒讀者,去洞察那更深藏的奧祕。因為亞比米勒經解釋,據說意思是「我父的國」。那麼,神的兒子耶穌基督正是在他父的國面前,就是在猶太人面前,改變了他的面貌,就是當他以卑微僕人的樣式而來,存心順服,以至於死,且死在十字架上時(腓立比書
21) it is read that David changed his countenance before Achish the king, when, drumming at the gates of the city, and bearing his own body in his own hands, and letting his spittle run down upon his beard, or performing the rest after the manner of a madman, he expressed a type of the Lord's Passion. Since therefore he is changed in name, Abimelech for Achish, it admonished the reader, from the very interpretations of the names, to penetrate the mystery lying more deeply hidden. For Abimelech, being interpreted, is said to mean 'my father's kingdom.' Then therefore the Son of God, Jesus Christ, changed his countenance before the kingdom of his Father, that is, before the Jews, when, coming in the humble form of a servant, and being made obedient even to the death of the cross (Phil.
19:18
n), quod proprie in tympano figuratur, Judaeorum incredulitate despecla gentibus voluit Evangelium praedicare, ex quibus sibi Ecclesiam conquisivit. Hoc enim est: Dimisit eum et abiit, quod aperte Paulus apostolus dicit (Act. XIII): Vobis quidem missum est verbum hoc, sed quoniam repulistis illud, et indignos vos judicaslis aeternae vitæ, ecce convertimur ad gentes; vel illud In parabola vineae (Matth. XXI): Malos male perdet, et vineam suam locabit aliis agricolis. Ex hac pene regula, illius quoque locutionis specimen puto descendere, quo legimus: Montes exsultaverunt velut arietes, et colles velut agni avium (Psal. CXIII); et, Flumina plaudent manibus (Psal. XCVII);
二章)——這在擊鼓一事中適切地被預表——他既輕看猶太人的不信,便願意向萬民傳福音,從他們中間為自己得著一間教會。因為這正是:「他打發他去,他就離開了」——使徒保羅明明地宣告(使徒行傳十三章):「神的道本應當先傳給你們,只因你們棄絕這道,斷定自己不配得永生,我們就轉向外邦人去。」或如葡萄園的比喻(馬太福音廿一章):「他要下毒手除滅那些惡人,將葡萄園另租給別的園戶。」我認為那另一種說法的樣式也幾乎是從這同一準則衍生出來的,就是我們所讀的:「大山踴躍如公羊,小山跳舞如羊群」(詩篇一百一十三篇[一百一十四篇]);又,「江河要拍手」(詩篇九十七篇[九十八篇]);
2)—which is properly figured in the drumming—he willed, the unbelief of the Jews being despised, to preach the Gospel to the nations, from whom he gained for himself a Church. For this is: He sent him away and he departed—which the Apostle Paul openly declares (Acts 13): To you indeed was this word sent, but since you have rejected it and judged yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we turn to the nations; or that in the parable of the vineyard (Matt. 21): He will miserably destroy the wicked men, and will let out his vineyard to other husbandmen. From nearly this same rule I think descends the pattern of that expression also, whereby we read: The mountains skipped like rams, and the hills like the lambs of the flock (Ps. 113 [114]); and, The rivers shall clap their hands (Ps. 97 [98]);
19:19
itemque, Ambulaverunt ligna ungere super regem (Judic.). His autem modis non quod actum contigit intimatur, cum utique deneget impossibilitas eis naturalis, sed aliquid per congruam significationem translate describitur. His quoque modis parabolas rerum a parabolis puto discerni verborum. Sextus sane modus, quo utique Christi dignoscitur adventus, id esi, quae ad primum, quae localiter referenda sint ad secundum, aliud cst cernere, id est, primus sibi humiliationis vindicat loca, sicuti est quod Moyses dicit (Deut. XVIII): Prophetam vobis suscitabit Deus ex fratribus vestris; sicut me illum audietis; itemque, Posthaec in terris visus es, et cum hominibus con. versatus es (Baruc.).
同樣,「樹木出去要膏一王治理他們」(士師記[九章])。但這些模式並非在暗示所發生的事真的照字面發生了,因為本性上的不可能全然否定這些事臨到它們;乃是藉合宜的表意以比喻方式描述某事。我也認為藉這些模式,可將事物的比喻與言詞的比喻區分開來。至於第六種模式,藉此可辨認基督的降臨——就是哪些當歸於第一次降臨、哪些按其處境當歸於第二次——分辨這事乃是一回事;就是說,第一次降臨為自己認取那些卑微的處所,如摩西所說(申命記十八章):「神要從你們弟兄中間給你興起一位先知像我,你們要聽從他」;同樣,「此後神在地上出現,與世人同住」(巴錄書[三章38節])。
and likewise, The trees went forth to anoint a king over them (Judges [9]). But by these modes it is not intimated that what happened actually took place, since natural impossibility altogether denies it to them, but something is described metaphorically by a fitting signification. By these modes too I think parables of things are distinguished from parables of words. The sixth mode indeed, whereby the coming of Christ is discerned—that is, which things are to be referred to the first coming, which locally to the second—it is one thing to discern; that is, the first claims for itself the places of humiliation, such as that which Moses says (Deut. 18): God will raise up for you a Prophet from among your brethren; him you shall hear, as me; and likewise, Afterward he was seen upon earth, and conversed with men (Baruch [3:38]).
19:20
Et iterum, Non est species ei neque decor, et vidimus eum, et non erat ei aspectus, despectum et novissimum virorum, virum dolorum (Isa. LIII). Et post paululum, Languores nostros ipse tulit (Ibidem), etc. Et iterum, Sicut agnus ad occisionem ducetur, et sicut ovis coram tondente sine voce, sic non aperuit os suum (Ibidem). De secundo autem adventu legimus: Deus manifestus veniet, Deus noster, et non silebit (Psal. XLIX). Et, Aspicient ad te quem confixerunt (Zach. XII). Malachias. quoque dicit: Accedam ad vos in judicio, et ero testis velox super maleficos et adulleros et perjuros, et qui calumniantur mercedem mercenarii (Malac. III). etc.
又說,「他無佳形美容,我們看見他的時候,也無美貌使我們羨慕他;他被藐視,為人所厭棄,是憂患之人」(以賽亞書五十三章)。稍後又說,「他親自擔當我們的軟弱」(同上),等等。又說,「他像羊羔被牽到宰殺之地,又像羊在剪毛的人手下無聲,他也是這樣不開口」(同上)。但論到第二次降臨,我們讀到:「我們的神要顯明地來,絕不靜默」(詩篇四十九篇[五十篇])。又,「他們要仰望我,就是他們所扎的」(撒迦利亞書十二章)。瑪拉基也說:「我必臨近你們施行審判,我必速速作見證,警戒行邪術的、犯姦淫的、起假誓的,以及虧負雇工工價的」(瑪拉基書三章),等等。
And again, There is no beauty in him nor comeliness; and we saw him, and there was no sightliness in him; despised and the most abject of men, a man of sorrows (Isa. 53). And a little after, He himself bore our infirmities (ibid.), etc. And again, He shall be led as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before the shearer he was dumb, so he opened not his mouth (ibid.). But of the second coming we read: God shall come manifestly, our God, and shall not keep silence (Ps. 49 [50]). And, They shall look upon me whom they have pierced (Zech. 12). Malachi also says: I will come near to you in judgment, and I will be a swift witness against sorcerers and adulterers and perjurers, and those who wrong the hire of the hireling (Mal. 3), etc.
19:21
Quod autem diximus de peccatis quorumdam hominum, aliquid saepe figurare propheticum, ibi maxime intus et foris indicia videntur emicare signorum. Publicum namquepeccatum David (II Reg. XI, xn) de uxore Uriæ Hethæi patebat, sed de ipsius opere malo prophetia nobis boni aliquid figuravit. Bethsabee quippe interpretatur puteus satietatis, sive puteus septimus, quo proprie significatur Ecclesia. Quam Christus separato ab ea, occisoque diabolo, cujus non legitimo consortio tenebatur, sibi ex gentibus sociavit. De hac etiam in Cantico canticorum legimus (Cant. IV): Puteus aquæ vivæ; cui numero iste conjungitur, propter septenariam operationem Spiritus sancti.
但至於我們所說的,某些人的罪常預表某種預言之事,正是在那裡,那些記號的裡外指示似乎最為顯明地閃現出來。因為大衛論到赫人烏利亞妻子的公開的罪(撒母耳記下十一、十二章)是眾所周知的,然而正從那惡行,預言為我們預表了某種善事。因為拔示巴經解釋是「滿足之井」,或「第七井」,藉此正合宜地表徵教會。基督把魔鬼從她身上分開並殺了牠——她本被魔鬼那不合法的同居所拘束——就從萬民中將她與自己聯合。論到她,我們也在雅歌中讀到(雅歌四章):「活水的井」;這井與那數目相連,是因聖靈的七重運行。
But as to what we said, that the sins of certain men often figure something prophetic, there most of all do the indications of the signs seem to flash forth within and without. For the public sin of David (II [Sam.] 11, 12) concerning the wife of Uriah the Hittite was open, yet from that very evil deed the prophecy figured for us something good. For Bathsheba is interpreted 'the well of satiety,' or 'the seventh well,' by which the Church is properly signified. Whom Christ, having separated the devil from her and slain him—by whose unlawful consort she was held—joined to himself out of the nations. Of her also we read in the Canticle of Canticles (Cant. 4): A well of living water; to which number this one is joined, on account of the sevenfold operation of the Holy Spirit.
19:22
Nam et in nomine Uriæ Hethaei, evidenter ostenditur diaboli significari persona. Urias namque, quod interpretatum dicitur, Lux mea Dei; Hethæus autem, abscissus, sive quia in veritate non stetit, sed a luce sua superna, quam de Deo habebat, superbiæ merito abscissus est; sive cadendo veris viribus perditis, transfigurat se velut angelum lucis (11 Cor. xi), audens adhuc dicere: Lux mea Dei est. Super tecta itaque domus delavantem se mulierem David rex manu fortis, petulanti oculo vidit, concupivit et abstulit (II Reg. XI).
因為在赫人烏利亞的名字裡,也明顯表明所表徵的是魔鬼的位格。因為烏利亞經解釋,據說意思是「我的光是屬神的」;而赫人意即「被剪除的」,或是因為牠沒有站在真理中,反倒因其驕傲,理當被剪除,離開了牠從神所得的那屬天的光;或是因為牠墮落並喪失了真正的能力,就裝作光明的天使(哥林多後書十一章),竟仍敢說:「我的光是屬神的。」於是大衛王,那手有能力的,以放縱的眼目看見那婦人在屋頂上洗澡,就起了貪念,將她奪了過來(撒母耳記下十一章)。
For in the name of Uriah the Hittite also, the person of the devil is evidently shown to be signified. For Uriah, being interpreted, is said to mean 'my light is of God'; and the Hittite, 'cut off,' either because he did not stand in the truth, but was deservedly cut off by his pride from his own supernal light which he had from God; or because, falling and losing his true powers, he transfigures himself as an angel of light (II Cor. 11), daring still to say: My light is of God. So David the king, mighty of hand, saw with a wanton eye the woman washing herself upon the roof of the house, and coveted and took her away (II [Sam.] 11).
19:23
Christus sane Rex regum, Ecclesiam lavacro atque in verbo mundatam, terrena calcantem, coelestibus inhiantem praedestinans vidit, providus vocatam dilexit sponsus, ut justificatam sibi conjungeret legitimus conjugio spiritali maritus, sicut etiam Moyses (Exod. n) in persona Christi de aqua susceptus, Ægyptium insidiantem Hebraeo, id est diabolum Israelitis infensum, calcis ictu prosternens, sub arena texit occisum. Omnes enim, dicit Apostolus (Galai. III), qui baptizati estis, Christum induistis. In quo faciemus virtutem, ut confidenter dicamus: In Idumæam extendam calceamentum meum, mihi alienigenae subditi sunt (Psal. LIX).
基督誠然是萬王之王,他預見那藉洗濯並在道中得潔淨、踐踏屬地之物、渴慕屬天之物的教會,就預定並眷顧了她;這位有遠見的新郎在呼召她時就愛了她,要以合法丈夫的身分,藉屬靈的婚姻,把稱義的她與自己聯合——正如摩西(出埃及記二章)代表基督,從水中被救起,用腳跟一擊,擊倒那伏擊希伯來人的埃及人,就是那與以色列人為敵的魔鬼,把被殺者藏在沙下。使徒說(加拉太書三章):「你們凡受洗歸入基督的,都是披戴基督了。」在他裡面我們必行奇事,以致可以坦然說:「我要向以東拋鞋,外邦人都服在我以下」(詩篇五十九篇[六十篇])。
Christ indeed, the King of kings, foreseeing the Church cleansed by the laver and in the word, treading upon earthly things, gaping after heavenly things, predestined and beheld her; the provident bridegroom loved her when called, that as a lawful husband he might join her, justified, to himself in spiritual wedlock—just as Moses too (Exod. 2), in the person of Christ, taken up from the water, laid low with a blow of his heel the Egyptian who lay in wait for the Hebrew, that is, the devil hostile to the Israelites, and hid the slain man under the sand. For all of you, says the Apostle (Gal. 3), who have been baptized, have put on Christ. In whom we shall do valiantly, so that we may confidently say: Into Idumaea I will stretch out my shoe; the strangers are made subject to me (Ps. 59 [60]).
19:24
Qui conterens Satanam sub pedibus nostris, ejus morticinam in eis tantum latere permittit, quos stabiles non esse cognoscens, mobililate arenæ veraciter comparavit, Hoc etiam in Tha. mar nuru Judæ (Gen. XXXVIII), aliisque compluribus novimus fuisse peractum, ut illis culpa cadentibus a Deo, qui novit bene uti edam malis nostris, aliud do illis mysterio gereretur. Omnia enim illius temporis in eodem populo gesta prophetiam esse futurorum docet Apostolus dicens (I Cor. X): Omnia enim hæc in figura contingebant illis. Et licet illi aut purgato. rias pro commisso poenas luerent, aut veniam pœnitentiæ remediis impetrarent, nobis tamen divina clementia dispensationis Christi praeparavit effectum.
他把撒但踐踏在我們腳下,卻只容牠的屍首潛藏在那些人裡面——他既知這些人並不堅定,便確切地把他們比作沙的浮動不定。這事我們也知道在猶大的兒媳他瑪身上(創世記卅八章),以及在許多別人身上,曾如此成就:當那些人在神面前陷於罪咎時——神深知如何善用我們的惡——便藉奧祕的方式在他們身上成就了另一件事。因為使徒教導說,那時代在那同一民族中所發生的一切,都是將來之事的預言,他說(哥林多前書十章):「這一切事的臨到他們,都是預表。」雖然那些人或為所犯的付了煉淨的刑罰,或藉悔改的補救得了赦免,然而神的慈憐卻為我們預備了基督救贖安排的功效。
He who, crushing Satan beneath our feet, permits his carrion to lie hidden only in those whom, knowing them not to be steadfast, he has truly compared to the instability of sand. This too we know was accomplished in Tamar, the daughter-in-law of Judah (Gen. 38), and in very many others, so that, while those persons fell into guilt before God—who knows well how to use even our evils—something else was wrought concerning them by way of mystery. For the Apostle teaches that all the deeds of that time among that same people are a prophecy of things to come, saying (I Cor. 10): For all these things happened to them in figure. And although those persons either paid purgatorial penalties for what they had committed, or obtained pardon by the remedies of penitence, yet for us the divine clemency prepared the effect of the dispensation of Christ.
19:25
Foris ergo peccata parebant, imus autem mysteria latitabant. Quæ ideo de nuru Judæ malui præterire, ne hoc opus multo ampliore longius sermone distendam. De unius denique facto, id est Loth uxorisque ejus (Gen. XIX), quid B. Augustinus contra Fanstum Manichæum perorans dixerit, pro generali similium intellectu locorum, huic operi conserendum putavi. Dicit enim: Sicut autem aliud genus hominum in ejus uxore figuratum est, eorum scilicet qui per gratiam Da i vocati, retro respiciunt, non sicut Paulus, qui ea quae retro sunt obliviscitur, et in ea quæ ante sunt extenditur (Philip. III). Unde et ipse Dominus:
如此,罪在外面顯露,奧祕卻在裡面隱藏。這些論到猶大兒媳的事,我寧願略過,免得用更冗長豐富的論述把這著作拉得過長。最後,論到一人的事,就是羅得和他妻子的事(創世記十九章),蒙福的奧古斯丁在他駁斥摩尼教徒福斯圖斯的論述中所說的話,我認為適合插入本著作,以助人對類似經文有普遍的理解。因為他說:正如另一類人被預表在他妻子身上,就是那些蒙神恩典呼召卻回頭觀望的人——不像保羅那樣忘記背後、努力面前(腓立比書三章)。因此主自己說:
Outwardly, then, the sins appeared, but inwardly the mysteries lay hidden. These things concerning the daughter-in-law of Judah I chose rather to pass over, lest I should draw out this work at greater length with a much more copious discourse. Finally, concerning the deed of one man, that is, of Lot and his wife (Gen. 19), what blessed Augustine said in his discourse against Faustus the Manichaean, I have thought fit to insert into this work, for the general understanding of similar passages. For he says: But just as another kind of men was figured in his wife, namely of those who, called by the grace of God, look back—not like Paul, who forgets the things that are behind, and stretches forth to the things that are before (Phil. 3). Whence the Lord himself:
19:26
Nemo, inquit, imponens manum super aratrum, et respiciens retro, aptus est regno coelorum (Luc. IX). Nec illud exemplum tacuit, quo nos tanquam sale condiret, nt non fatui negligeremus, sed prudentes caveremus hoc malum (Luc. XVII). Unde et illa ut hoc admonerer, in statuam salis conversa est (Gen. XIX). Sic etiam in ipso Loth, quando cum illo filiæ concubuerunt, non illud quod cum a Sodomis lib ratus est, sed aliud aliquid figuratum est; nam tunc ille ipse Loth futura legis videtur gestasse personam: quam quidam ex illa procreati et sub lege posili male intelligendo, quodammodoinebriante aqua nonlegitime utendo, infidelitatis opera pariunt: bona est enim lex, ait Apostolus (7 Tim. i).
他說,「手扶著犁向後看的,不配進神的國」(路加福音九章)。他也沒有略去那個例子,藉此如同用鹽調味我們,使我們不像愚人那樣忽略,乃像智慧人那樣防備這惡(路加福音十七章)。因此她——為要提醒我這事——也變成了一根鹽柱(創世記十九章)。照樣,在羅得自己身上,當他女兒與他同寢時,所預表的並非他從所多瑪得救時所發生的事,乃是另有所指;因為那時羅得自己可見是擔負了將來律法的位格:某些從律法所生、又置於律法之下的人,因誤解律法——如同用那使人醉的水,不合法地使用它——就生出不信的行為;因為律法原是好的,使徒說(提摩太前書一章),
No man, he says, putting his hand to the plough and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of heaven (Luke 9). Nor did he pass over that example, whereby he might season us as with salt, that we should not, as fools, neglect, but, as prudent, beware of this evil (Luke 17). Whence she too, that I might be admonished of this, was turned into a pillar of salt (Gen. 19). So too in Lot himself, when his daughters lay with him, not that which happened when he was delivered from Sodom, but something else was figured; for then Lot himself is seen to have borne the person of the future law: which certain ones begotten of it and placed under the law, by understanding it ill—as it were by the intoxicating water, using it unlawfully—bring forth the works of unbelief; for the law is good, says the Apostle (I Tim. 1),
19:27
si quis ea legitime utatur. Nec ideo tamen boc factum vel ipsius Loth, vel ejus filiarum justificamus, quia significavit aliud quod futuram quorumdam perversitatem pronuniiaret: aliud enim illæ, ut hoc facerent, intenderunt; aliud Deus, qui hoc fieri permisit, ut etiam inde aliquid demonstraret, manente recto judicio super peccata hominum tunc præsentium, et vigilante providentia sua pro significatione futurorum. Proinde aliud factum, cum in sancta Scriptura narratur, prophetia est: cum vero in illorum vita qui hoc commiserunt, consideratur, flagitium est. Et hæc quidem S. Augustinus sic intelligenda præmisit, ut de nuru Judæ vel similibus hoc doceat sentiendum.
倘若人合法地使用它。然而我們並不因此稱義羅得自己或他女兒的這行為,因為它表徵了另一件預告某些人將來悖逆的事;因為那些婦人行這事時所存的意念是一回事,而神——他允許這事發生,為要藉此顯明某事——所存的意念又是另一回事;同時他公義的審判仍臨到當時在場之人的罪,他的護理也為將來之事的表意守望。因此,一件行為,當它記載於聖經中時,乃是預言;但當它就行此事之人的生平來看時,乃是醜行。這些事聖奧古斯丁確實闡明為當如此理解,以致他教導人,論到猶大的兒媳或類似的事,都當這樣看待。
if one use it lawfully. Nor yet do we for this reason justify this deed either of Lot himself or of his daughters, because it signified something else which foretold the future perversity of certain persons; for the women intended one thing in doing this, and God, who permitted this to be done that he might thereby demonstrate something, intended another—while his upright judgment remained upon the sins of the men then present, and his providence kept watch for the signification of things to come. Accordingly, one deed, when it is narrated in holy Scripture, is prophecy; but when it is considered in the life of those who committed it, it is a disgrace. And these things indeed St. Augustine set forth as thus to be understood, so that he teaches this is to be thought concerning the daughter-in-law of Judah or the like.
19:28
Septimus proinde modus, qui geminam praeceptorum retinet qualitatem, ille est vitae agendae, ut, exempli gratia: Diliges proximum tuum tanquam teipsum (Lev. XIX); qui enim diligit proximum, legem adimplevit, sicut Apostolus plenius disputat (Rom. xv); et vita figurandx circumcisionis et sabbati, vel carnalium victimarum Qui modus cum secundo similis esse videatur; illa tamen ratione discernitur, quod hic ad mores tantum, ille etiam redigendus sit ad fidem. Propterea et Jacobus apostolus invicem utrumque discernit, dicens (Jac. II): Fides, si opera non habeat, mortua est in semetipsa;
因此,第七種模式——它保有命令的雙重性質——就是關乎所當度之生活的,例如:「要愛人如己」(利未記十九章);因為愛鄰舍的就完全了律法,正如使徒更充分地論證的(羅馬書十三章[原文誤作十五章]);又如預表割禮、安息日或屬肉體祭牲的生活。這模式雖看似與第二種相似,卻藉這一點加以區別:這一種只當歸於道德,那一種卻也當歸於信德。因此使徒雅各也把二者彼此區分,說(雅各書二章):「信心若沒有行為,就是死的;」
The seventh mode, therefore, which retains a twofold quality of precepts, is that of the life to be lived, as, for example: You shall love your neighbour as yourself (Lev. 19); for he who loves his neighbour has fulfilled the law, as the Apostle more fully argues (Rom. 13); and of the life figuring circumcision and the sabbath, or the carnal victims. And although this mode seems to be similar to the second, yet it is distinguished by this consideration, that this is to be reduced only to morals, but that also to faith. Therefore the Apostle James too distinguishes both from each other, saying (James 2): Faith, if it have not works, is dead in itself;
19:29
nam circumcisione cardUum detruncatio vitiorum, sabbato autem illa requies intelligitur animarum, de qua dicitur (Psal. XLV): Vacate et videte quoniam ego sum Dominus; victimis autem, ut exhibeamus corpora nostra hostiam vivam, sanctam, Deo placentem (Rom. XII). Aliaque ea quae fuerunt in Veteri Testamento praecepta, vitne actibus adimplenda, alia vitae significationibus adumbrata. lllis implendis suam Christus gratiam porrigi, istis removendis se pronuntiatum suo tempore voluit praesentari. Lex enim per Moysen data est (Joan. i, tanquam exterior in parte fotis, id est, Non concupisces (Exod. XX), vel potius illud: Post concupiscentias tuas non eas (Eccli. XVIII).
因為割禮被理解為除去諸惡,安息日被理解為靈魂的安息,論到這安息經上說(詩篇四十五篇[四十六篇]):「你們要休息,要知道我是神」;至於祭牲,則指我們要將身體獻上,當作活祭,是聖潔的,是神所喜悅的(羅馬書十二章)。舊約中還有別的命令,有些當藉生活的作為來成全,有些則藉生命的表意來預示。前者的成全,基督願意賜下他的恩典;後者的除去,他願意自己按著預言,在自己的時候被呈現出來。因為律法本是藉摩西傳的(約翰福音一章),如同在外面,一部分是外顯的,就是「不可貪戀」(出埃及記二十章),或更確切地說是那句:「不可隨從你的私慾」(便西拉智訓十八章)。
for by circumcision is understood the cutting off of vices, but by the sabbath that rest of souls, of which it is said (Ps. 45 [46]): Be still, and see that I am the Lord; and by the victims, that we should present our bodies a living sacrifice, holy, pleasing to God (Rom. 12). And there were other precepts which were in the Old Testament, some to be fulfilled by the acts of life, others foreshadowed by significations of life. For the fulfilling of the former Christ willed his grace to be extended; for the removal of the latter he willed himself, foretold, to be presented in his own time. For the law was given by Moses (John 1), as it were outwardly, in part without, that is, You shall not covet (Exod. 20), or rather that: You shall not go after your concupiscences (Ecclus. 18).
19:30
Gratia autem ct veritas per Jesum Christum facta est (Joan. i), tanquam in parte intus occulta, adveniente plenitndine temporum revelata. In his namque quæ pro dilectione Dei et proximi apertius jubebantur, licet patens inde mutabilis praecepti forma permanscrit, gratia tamen populus infirmus egebat, qui gemens sub legis pondere laborabat, in illis vero figuraiis pecorum victimis offerendis, Agnus ille venturus exspectabatur, cui reposita fuisse veraciter prænuntiabantur, ut ipso veniente in quo sunt omnes thesauri sapientiæ et scientiae absconditi (Colos. II). vitae agendæ præcepta data gratia complerentur, figuræ autem tanquam umbrae (Hebr. VIII), manifestata veritate, protinus fugarentur.
但恩典和真理都是由耶穌基督來的(約翰福音一章),如同在裡面隱藏的部分,在時候滿足來到時被啟示出來。因為在那些為愛神愛人而更明白地吩咐的事上,雖然那明顯而可變的命令形式從此存留,軟弱的百姓卻仍需要恩典,他們在律法的重擔下呻吟勞苦;但在那些預表性、當獻上的牲畜祭牲中,人所等候的是那將要來的羔羊,經上真確地預告這些祭牲是為他存留的——以致當他,就是那藏著一切智慧知識寶藏的主(歌羅西書二章),來到時,所當度之生活的命令便藉所賜的恩典得以成全,而那些預像如同影兒(希伯來書八章),在真理顯明之後,立即被驅散。
But grace and truth came by Jesus Christ (John 1), as it were in the part within, hidden, revealed at the coming of the fullness of the times. For in those things which were more openly commanded for the love of God and neighbour, although the plain and changeable form of the precept thence remained, yet the weak people needed grace, groaning as they laboured under the weight of the law; but in those figurative victims of beasts to be offered, that Lamb to come was awaited, for whom they were foretold to have been truly laid up in store—so that when he came, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge (Col. 2), the precepts of the life to be lived might be fulfilled by the grace given, while the figures, as it were shadows (Heb. 8), the truth being made manifest, should straightway be put to flight.
19:31
Aliud quippe fuit in Veteri Testamento, quod sic occidente littera jubebatur, ut vivificante Spiritu, posset implere, siculi est: Post concupiscentias tuas non eas (Eccli. XVIII). Unde Paulus dicit (Rom. IV): Lex enim iram operatur. Ubi autem non est lex, nec prævaricatio. Quod licet foris sine tegmine audienti clareret, implere tamen suis viribus humana infirmitas non valebat. Aliud quod intus mystico velamine tectum, adventum Domini flagitabat, cui exemplaret umbrae deserviunt (Hebr. VIII). In illo enim nobis vitae coelestis forma consistit, ex cnjus fide justus vivit (Hebr. n). Illis apertis lex convincebAt reos (Rom. i), prodebat infirmos, ut salvatio quaereretur.
因為舊約中有一件事,是這樣藉那叫人死的字句被吩咐的,以致人可藉那叫人活的靈成全它,例如:「不可隨從你的私慾」(便西拉智訓十八章)。因此保羅說(羅馬書四章):「律法是惹動忿怒的;哪裡沒有律法,哪裡就沒有過犯。」這命令雖然向聽者毫無遮蓋地清楚顯明,人的軟弱卻不能靠自己的能力成全它。還有另一件事,藉奧祕的帕子在裡面被遮蓋,要求主的降臨,那些影兒作為它的樣本服事它(希伯來書八章)。因為天上生活的形式對我們就在乎這事,義人因這信而活(羅馬書一章[原文誤引希伯來書二章])。藉那明白的命令,律法定罪人有罪(羅馬書一章),暴露軟弱之人,使人尋求救恩。
For there was one thing in the Old Testament which was so commanded by the killing letter that by the quickening Spirit one could fulfil it, such as: You shall not go after your concupiscences (Ecclus. 18). Whence Paul says (Rom. 4): For the law works wrath; but where there is no law, neither is there transgression. Which, although it shone clear without covering to the hearer, yet human weakness could not fulfil it by its own powers. There was another thing which, covered within by a mystical veil, demanded the coming of the Lord, for which the shadows served as copies (Heb. 8). For in that consists for us the form of the heavenly life, by whose faith the just man lives (Heb. 2 [Rom. 1]). By the plain precepts the law convicted the guilty (Rom. 1), betrayed the weak, that salvation might be sought.
19:32
Istis vero significantibus, tanquam in interiora velaminis Christum parturiebant fore venturum, quo veniente, remota celebratio destitit figurarum, quae umbra fuerat iuturorum. Nec est ulterius quaerenda, ex quo ipsius vivi corporis veritas claruit manifesta (Hebr. vIIIj. Finis enim legis Christus ad justitiam omni credenti (Rom. x). Ad hoc pertinere puto illorum bipartitam præceptorum distributionem, de quibus tractans Apostotus dicit, enumeransque sane dicit (I Tim. I): Bona est lex, si quis ea legitime utatur. Dixerat enim (Ibid.): Finis praecepti est charitas de corde puro, et conscientia bona, et fide non ficta.
但藉那些表意之事,如同在帕子之內,他們懷胎盼望基督將要來到;及至他來了,那些預像的遵守——它們原是將來之事的影兒——便止息並被除去了。從他自己活的身體之真理顯明彰顯的那一刻起(希伯來書八章),就不必再尋求了。因為律法的總結就是基督,使凡信他的都得著義(羅馬書十章)。我認為那命令的雙重分配也屬於此,使徒論及並一一列舉時說(提摩太前書一章):「律法原是好的,只要人合法地使用。」因為他先說(同上):「命令的總歸就是愛,這愛是從清潔的心、無虧的良心和無偽的信心生出來的。」
But by those signifying things, as it were within the veil, they travailed that Christ was to come; and when he came, the observance of the figures, which had been a shadow of things to come, ceased and was removed. Nor is it any longer to be sought, from the moment that the truth of his own living body shone forth manifest (Heb. 8). For Christ is the end of the law unto justice to everyone that believes (Rom. 10). To this I think pertains that twofold distribution of the precepts, of which the Apostle, treating and duly enumerating, says (I Tim. 1): The law is good, if one use it lawfully. For he had said (ibid.): The end of the commandment is charity, from a pure heart, and a good conscience, and faith unfeigned.
19:33
Quo dicto legem fidei evidenter insinuans, legem quoque factorum mox secutus expressit, dicens: Justis lex non est posita, sed injustis, impiis et peccatoribus, et caetera adversaria doctrinae. linde quaeri potest, cum lex justo non ponitur, quomodo ea legitime justus uti dicatur, quia nos terrere non indiget poena pœnantium praeceptorum, qui per gratiam libere jam fruimur perfectione virtutum. Jam quippe ei fides impetravit, quod ne suis quisquam viribus assignaret, Aposlolus dicit (Rom. in): Omnes enim peccaverunt, et egent gloria Dei. Ostenditur quippe in nobis primum volunlas firma per legem, sed voluntatem gratia sanavit, et legem voluntas implevit.
他藉這話,明明地啟示信心的律法,隨即又接著表明行為的律法,說:「律法本不是為義人設立的,乃是為不法和不服的、不虔誠和犯罪的,以及其餘敵對純正道理的人設立的。」由此可問:既然律法不是為義人設立的,為何說義人合法地使用它?因為我們不需被那些施加刑罰之命令的懲罰所嚇,我們既已藉恩典自由地享有諸德的完全。因為信心已為他得著那事——為免有人歸功於自己的能力,使徒說(羅馬書三章):「因為世人都犯了罪,虧缺了神的榮耀。」因為在我們裡面,首先藉律法顯出堅定的意志,但恩典醫治了意志,意志便成全了律法。
By which saying, evidently insinuating the law of faith, he presently followed it up by expressing also the law of deeds, saying: The law is not made for the just, but for the unjust, the impious and sinners, and the rest that are contrary to sound doctrine. Whence it may be asked, since the law is not set for the just man, how the just man is said to use it lawfully—since we do not need to be terrified by the penalty of penalizing precepts, we who through grace now freely enjoy the perfection of the virtues. For faith has already obtained for him that which, lest anyone should ascribe it to his own powers, the Apostle says (Rom. 3): For all have sinned, and need the glory of God. For there is shown in us first a firm will through the law, but grace healed the will, and the will fulfilled the law.
19:34
Ideo timere nolentibus impiis lex imponitur, ut eis impune peccare non liceat. Ideo autem justis non imponitur, eo quod saucti Spiritus cliaritate praecepta, eos ultra peccare non liceat. Utuntur autem lege justi ad alios vel erudicndos monitis præceptorum, vel informandos imitabilium forma virlutum.Sic Apostolus utrumque discernit, cum dicit (Rom. VIII): Vos enim accepistis spiritum adoptionis filiorum, in quo clamamus, Abba Pater. Hoc orante Apostoli consilio delectati, etiam dicit, ea postponentes, potiora dileximus. Unde idem (I Cor. VII):
因此,律法加在那些不肯敬畏的不虔之人身上,使他們不得任意犯罪而不受懲罰。但律法不加在義人身上,因為他們既被聖靈的愛所命定,就不再被容許繼續犯罪。然而義人使用律法,或用命令的勸誡來教導別人,或用可效法之美德的榜樣來塑造別人。使徒如此區分二者,說(羅馬書八章):「你們所受的乃是兒子名分的靈,因此我們呼叫:阿爸,父。」他既喜悅這禱告之使徒的勸勉,也就說,把那些事放在其後,我們愛慕那更美的事。因此同一位使徒說(哥林多前書七章):
Therefore the law is imposed upon the impious who are unwilling to fear, so that it may not be permitted them to sin with impunity. But it is not imposed upon the just, because, being commanded by the charity of the Holy Spirit, they are no longer permitted to sin further. But the just use the law either for instructing others by the admonitions of the precepts, or for forming them by the pattern of imitable virtues. Thus the Apostle distinguishes both, when he says (Rom. 8): For you have received the spirit of the adoption of sons, in whom we cry, Abba, Father. Delighting in this counsel of the praying Apostle, he also says, setting those things after, we have loved the better things. Whence the same (I Cor. 7):
19:35
De virginibus, inquit, præceptum Domini non habeo, consilium autem do, exhortatione id agens, non præcepto compellens monentis Domini magisterium sequens, quo dixit (Matth.. XIX): Qui potest capere, capiat. Unde quia nunc operarius est, tractare suscepti operis non sinit intentio. Hanc inierim speciem intra buuc modum tanquam genere suo concludi, nos dixisse sufficiat, scriptum intus et foris. Jure porro quaeritur de istis septem, quos pracmisimus modis, qui debeant intus, qui forinsecus reputari. Est autem primus historicus foris. Secundus allegoricus, totus intus.
他說(林前七章):「論到童身的人,我沒有主的命令,但我給予意見」,他是以勸勉行此事,而非以命令強迫,乃是遵循那諄諄勸誡之主的教訓,主曾說(太十九):「這話誰能領受,就可以領受。」因此,既然他如今是一位勞作者,所承擔工作的用心便不容他細加論述。這一類別既被如此包含在此範圍之內,宛如歸於其本屬之類,我們既已言明「內外都寫著字」,這便足夠了。再者,關於我們前面所列的這七種方式,人們理當追問:哪些應算為內,哪些應算為外。第一是歷史的意義,在外。第二是寓意的意義,全然在內。
'Concerning virgins,' he says, 'I have no commandment of the Lord, but I give counsel' (1 Cor. 7), doing this by exhortation, not compelling by precept, following the teaching of the Lord who admonishes, when he said (Matt. 19): 'He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.' Hence, because he is now a laborer, the intent of the work undertaken does not permit him to treat of it. Let it suffice that we have said this species is enclosed within this measure as under its own genus, being written within and without. Rightly, moreover, it is asked concerning these seven modes which we set forth above, which ought to be reckoned within, and which without. The first is the historical, without. The second is the allegorical, wholly within.
19:36
Tertius utriusque geminam in se retinet formam, ut et praesentis tunc temporis congruum suppleret officium, et aliquid figurate gereret futurorum. Quartus de Deo, apud quem non est commutatio, nec [momenti] vicissitudinis obumbratio, (idc atque pietate. Uterque sensus intus debet accipi, nam intellectu non potest comprehendi. Pax enim Dei, ait Apostolus (Philip. IV), superat omnem sensum, quia et ejus essentia nostrae capacitatis metas excedit, et ejus clementiam, qua de se tropice multa narravit, nullus competenter attingit. Quintus sane, ubi aliud quam legitur invenitur, vel in parabolis saepe diffusus, ita est abstrusa quadam ambiguitate suspectus, ut intus sit modis omnibus reputandus.
第三種在自身中保有兩者雙重的形態,既能滿足當時現世合宜的職分,又能以象徵之法承載將來之事。第四種論及神,在祂並無更改,也無轉動的影兒(參雅一)。這兩重意義都當在內領受,因為它無法憑理智所測透。使徒說(腓四):「神的平安超乎人的一切意念」,因為祂的本質超越我們領受能力的界限,而祂的慈憐——祂曾以隱喻論及自身許多——也無人能夠恰當地企及。第五種確實是:在其中發現與所讀不同之意,或常在比喻中鋪展,因某種隱晦的雙關而甚為費解,以致無論如何都當算為內。
The third retains in itself a twofold form of both, so as both to supply the fitting office of the then present time and to convey something figuratively of things to come. The fourth concerns God, with whom there is no change, nor shadow of the vicissitude of a moment (cf. James 1). Both senses ought to be received within, for it cannot be comprehended by the understanding. 'For the peace of God,' says the Apostle (Phil. 4), 'surpasses all understanding,' because both his essence exceeds the bounds of our capacity, and no one adequately attains his clemency, of which he has related many things figuratively concerning himself. The fifth indeed, where something other than what is read is found, or is often diffused in parables, is so suspect through a certain hidden ambiguity that it must by all means be reckoned within.
19:37
Sextus de gemino Cbristi adventu certis claret testimoniis, foris in promptu positus, certis iutus latet occultis, ut apertis dubitationem auferat, abdita fidelis exerceat, fastidiaque detergat. Septimus in præceptis vitae agendae, sicut jam praemisimus foris apparet, in praeceptis autem vitae figurandæ intus latet. Hinc Danieli quoque dictum legimus (Dan. XII): Claude sermones et signa librum usque ad tempus statutum. Pertransibunt plurimi, et multiplex erit scientia: Signatum signis septem. Septem quoque hominis interioris aetates, quibus per gratiam Dei Spiritu mentis salubriler innovamur, patres nostri animadvertere. De his in libro de Vera Religione beatus Augustinus sic dicit:
第六種論及基督的兩次降臨,以確鑿的見證明明照耀,明擺在外,卻又隱藏在內於確實的奧秘中,好叫祂藉著顯明之事除去疑惑,藉著隱藏之事操練信徒並拭去他們的厭倦。第七種,正如我們前面所言,在當行之生活的誡命中顯於外,但在當被象徵之生活的誡命中則隱藏於內。因此我們讀到,主也對但以理說(但十二):「你要隱藏這些話,封閉這書,直到所定的時候。必有許多人往來奔跑,知識就必增長」——用七印封嚴。我們的教父也察覺到內在之人的七個階段,藉此靠神的恩典,我們在心思的靈裡得著有益的更新。論到這些,蒙福的奧古斯丁在《論真宗教》一書中如此說:
The sixth, concerning the twofold coming of Christ, shines forth with sure testimonies, set plainly without, yet lies hidden within in sure secrets, so that by things made open it may take away doubt, and by things concealed may exercise the faithful and wipe away weariness. The seventh, in the precepts of the life to be lived, as we have already premised, appears without, but in the precepts of the life to be figured it lies hidden within. Hence we read that it was said also to Daniel (Dan. 12): 'Shut up the words and seal the book until the appointed time. Many shall pass over, and knowledge shall be manifold': sealed with seven seals. Our fathers also perceived seven ages of the interior man, by which through the grace of God we are wholesomely renewed in the spirit of the mind. Concerning these blessed Augustine speaks thus in the book On True Religion:
下一段 →
← 第 18 章第 20 章 →
1234567891011121314151617181920212223

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。