📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 文集(天主之城·論三位一體等)

文集(天主之城·論三位一體等) 第 19 章 第 2/5 段

拉丁文原文.39 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 19:40–19:78(全章共 158 節)

← 第 18 章第 20 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
19:40
Per eos annos a rege Xantho Cretensium, cuius apud alios aliud nomen inuenimus, rapta perbibetur Europa, et inde geniti Rhadamanthus, Sarpedon et Minos, quos magis ex eadem muliere filios Iouis esse uulgatum est. Sed talium deorum cultores illud, quod de rege Cretensium diximus, historicae ueritati, hoc autem, quod de Ioue poetae cantant, theatra concrepant, populi celebrant, uanitati deputant fabularum, ut esset unde ludi fierent placandis numinibus etiam falsis eorum criminibus. His temporibus Hercules in Syria clarus habebatur; sed nimirum alius, non ille, de quo supra locuti sumus. Secretiore quippe historia plures fuisse dicuntur et Liberi patres et Hercules.
在那些年間,據傳歐羅巴被克里特人的王克桑托斯(他的名字在別的作者那裡我們見到不同的稱呼)擄去,並由此生了拉達曼提斯、薩耳佩冬和米諾斯;按更通行的說法,他們乃是尤庇特由那同一婦人所生的兒子。但這類神明的敬拜者卻把我們所說克里特王之事當作歷史真相,而把詩人們所歌詠、劇場所迴響、萬民所慶祝的關於尤庇特之事,歸入荒誕不經的虛妄之列,好叫他們有機會舉行競技,甚至以眾神這些虛假的罪行來平息神明。在這些時代,赫丘利在敘利亞頗負盛名;但無疑是另一位,並非我們上文所說的那一位。因為按更隱祕的史載,據說李柏爾父神和赫丘利都不止一位。
In those years Europa is reported to have been carried off by Xanthus, king of the Cretans (whose name we find given differently by other authors), and from him were begotten Rhadamanthus, Sarpedon, and Minos, who by the more common report are said to have been sons of Jupiter by that same woman. But the worshippers of such gods reckon what we have said of the king of the Cretans as historical truth, while what the poets sing of Jupiter — which the theatres resound with, the peoples celebrate — they reckon among the vanities of fables, so that there might be an occasion for holding games to appease the deities even by these false crimes of theirs. In these times Hercules was held famous in Syria; but doubtless another, not the one of whom we spoke above. For by a more secret history there are said to have been several both Father Libers and Herculeses.
19:41
Hunc sane Herculem, cuius ingentia duodecim facta numerant, inter quae Antaei Afri necem non commemorant, quod ea res ad alterum Herculem pertinet, in Oeta monte a se ipso incensum produnt suis litteris, cum ea uirtute, qua multa subegerat, morbum tamen, quo languebat, sustinere non posset. Illo tempore uel rex uel potius tyrannus Busiris suis diis suos hospites immolabat, quem filium perhibent fuisse Neptuni ex matre Libya, filia Epaphi. Verum non credatur hoc stuprum perpetrasse Neptunus, ne dii accusentur; sed poetis et theatris ista tribuantur, ut sit unde placentur.
這位赫丘利——人們數點他十二項巨大的功業,其中卻不包括殺死非洲人安泰俄斯,因為那事屬於另一位赫丘利——他們在自己的著作中記載,他在俄塔山上自焚而死,因為他以那曾征服眾多事物的力氣,卻無法忍受折磨他的病痛。那時,或稱為王、或更該稱為暴君的布西里斯,慣把自己的賓客獻祭給自己的神明;相傳他是尼普頓由母親利比亞(埃帕福斯之女)所生的兒子。但不可相信尼普頓犯下這淫行,免得眾神受控告;倒要把這類事歸給詩人和劇場,好使他們有得以被平息的憑藉。
This Hercules indeed, whose twelve mighty deeds they number — among which they do not include the slaying of Antaeus the African, because that matter pertains to another Hercules — they record in their own writings to have burned himself upon Mount Oeta, since with the very strength by which he had subdued so many things, he yet could not endure the disease with which he languished. At that time Busiris, either king or rather tyrant, used to sacrifice his own guests to his own gods; they say he was the son of Neptune by his mother Libya, daughter of Epaphus. But let it not be believed that Neptune committed this outrage, lest the gods be accused; rather let these things be ascribed to the poets and the theatres, that there may be a means of appeasing them.
19:42
Erichthonii regis Atheniensium, cuius nouissimis annis Iesus Naue mortuus reperitur, Vulcanus et Minerua parentes fuisse dicuntur. Sed quoniam Mineruam uirginem uolunt, in amborum contentione Vulcanum commotum effudisse aiunt semen in terram atque inde homini nato ob eam causam tale inditum nomen. Graeca enim lingua eris contentio, thon terra est, ex quibus duobus compositum uocabulum est Erichthonius.
據說雅典人的王埃里克托尼俄斯——嫩的兒子約書亞被查明是在他末年逝世的——他的父母乃是伏爾坎與密涅瓦。但因他們主張密涅瓦是童貞女,便說在二者的一場角力中,伏爾坎受了激動,把精液瀉在地上,於是由那從地生出的人,因這緣故,得了這樣一個名字。因為在希臘文中「厄里斯」意為紛爭,「同」意為地,這兩字合成便是「埃里克托尼俄斯」一詞。
Of Erichthonius, king of the Athenians, in whose last years Joshua son of Nun is found to have died, Vulcan and Minerva are said to have been the parents. But since they will have it that Minerva was a virgin, they say that in a struggle between the two, Vulcan, being aroused, poured out his seed upon the earth, and from the man thereby born, for that reason, such a name was given him. For in the Greek language 'eris' is strife, 'thon' is earth, and from these two the word Erichthonius is compounded.
19:43
Verum, quod fatendum est, refellunt et a suis diis repellunt ista doctiores, qui hanc opinionem fabulosam hinc exortam ferunt, quia in templo Vulcani et Mineruae, quod ambo unum habebant Athenis, expositus inuentus est puer dracone inuolutus, qui eum significauit magnum futurum et propter commune templum, cum essent parentes eius ignoti, Vulcani et Mineruae dictum esse filium. Nominis tamen eius originem fabula illa potius quam ista designat historia. Sed quid ad nos? Hoc in ueracibus libris homines instruat religiosos, illud in fallacibus ludis daemones delectet inpuros;
但——這是不得不承認的——更有學問的人卻駁斥這些傳說,並把它們從自己的眾神身上撇清,說這荒誕的看法之所以興起,乃因在伏爾坎與密涅瓦於雅典所共有的那一座廟宇裡,發現了一個被棄的嬰孩,裹在一條蛇中,這蛇表示他將要成為偉人;又因那共有的廟宇,且因他的父母不明,便說他是伏爾坎與密涅瓦之子。然而他名字的由來,與其說是這段歷史所指,不如說是那則神話所指。但這與我們何干呢?讓前者在真實的書中教導敬虔的人,讓後者在騙人的競技中取悅污穢的群魔——雖然那些敬虔的人竟把這些群魔當作神來敬拜。
But — as must be admitted — the more learned refute and repel these tales from their gods, saying that this fabulous opinion arose from the fact that in the temple of Vulcan and Minerva, which the two had as one at Athens, an exposed child was found wrapped in a serpent, which signified that he would be great; and, on account of the common temple, since his parents were unknown, he was said to be the son of Vulcan and Minerva. Yet the origin of his name is designated rather by that fable than by this history. But what is that to us? Let the one instruct religious men in truthful books; let the other delight impure demons in deceitful games — demons whom nevertheless those religious men worship as gods.
19:44
quos tamen illi religiosi tamquam deos colunt, et cum de illis haec negant, ab omni eos crimine purgare non possunt, quoniam ludos eis poscentibus exhibent, ubi turpiter aguntur, quae uelut sapienter negantur, et his falsis ac turpibus dii placantur, ubi etsi fabula cantat crimen numinum falsum, delectari tamen falso crimine crimen est uerum. [XIII] Post mortem Iesu Naue populus Dei iudices habuit, quibus temporibus alternauerunt apud eos et humilitates laborum pro eorum peccatis, et prosperitates consolationum propter miserationem Dei. His temporibus fabulae fictae sunt de Triptolemo, quod iubente Cerere anguibus portatus alitibus indigentibus terris frumenta uolando contulerit;
因為那些敬虔的人竟把這些群魔當作神來敬拜;他們雖然否認關於這些神的這類說法,卻無法使他們脫盡一切罪咎,因為他們應這些神的要求而上演競技,其中演出卑污的勾當——正是那些彷彿明智地被否認的事——並藉這些虛假而卑污的東西來平息眾神;在那裡,縱使神話所歌詠的是神明虛假的罪行,然而以虛假的罪行為樂,本身卻是真實的罪。在嫩的兒子約書亞死後,神的子民有了士師;在那些時代,他們中間交替出現:因他們的罪而有勞苦的卑屈,又因神的憐憫而有安慰的興盛。在這些時代,人們編造了關於特里普托勒摩斯的神話——說他奉刻瑞斯之命,由帶翼的蛇馱著,飛行把穀物帶給缺糧的各地;
For those religious men worship these demons as gods, and although they deny these things about them, they cannot cleanse them from every crime, since at their demand they present games in which base things are enacted — the very things that are, as it were, wisely denied — and by these false and base things the gods are appeased; where, even if the fable sings a false crime of the deities, yet to be delighted by a false crime is a true crime. After the death of Joshua son of Nun, the people of God had judges, in whose times there alternated among them both the humiliations of hardships on account of their sins, and the prosperities of consolations on account of God's mercy. In these times fables were invented about Triptolemus — that, at Ceres' bidding, borne by winged serpents, he brought grain by flying to lands in need of it;
19:45
de Minotauro, quod bestia fuerit inclusa Labyrintho, quo cum intrassent homines, inextricabili errore inde exire non poterant; de Centauris, quod equorum hominumque fuerit natura coniuncta; de Cerbero, quod sit triceps inferorum canis; de Phryxo et Helle eius sorore, quod uecti ariete uolauerint; de Gorgone, quod fuerit crinita serpentibus et aspicientes conuertebat in lapides; de Bellerophonte, quod equo pinnis uolante sit uectus, qui equus Pegasus dictus est; de Amphione, quod citharae suauitate lapides mulserit et adtraxerit; de fabro Daedalo et eius Icaro filio, quod sibi coaptatis pinnis uolauerint;
關於彌諾陶洛斯——說牠是被關在迷宮裡的一頭怪獸,人一旦進去,便因那難以脫身的曲徑而無法出來;關於半人馬——說在牠們身上馬與人的本性合為一體;關於刻耳柏洛斯——說牠是陰間那條三頭的狗;關於佛里克索斯和他妹妹赫勒——說他們騎著公羊飛行;關於戈耳工——說她以蛇為髮,凡看她的都變成石頭;關於柏勒洛豐——說他騎著一匹生翼飛行的馬,那馬名叫珀伽索斯;關於安菲翁——說他以七弦琴的悅耳之音使石頭軟化並吸引它們就近;關於工匠代達羅斯和他兒子伊卡洛斯——說他們裝上為自己配製的翅膀而飛翔;
about the Minotaur — that it was a beast shut up in the Labyrinth, into which when men had entered they could not, by reason of the inextricable maze, find their way out; about the Centaurs — that in them the nature of horses and of men was joined; about Cerberus — that he was the three-headed dog of the lower world; about Phrixus and his sister Helle — that they flew borne by a ram; about the Gorgon — that she was maned with serpents and turned those who looked upon her into stones; about Bellerophon — that he was borne by a horse flying with wings, which horse was called Pegasus; about Amphion — that by the sweetness of his lyre he softened stones and drew them to himself; about the craftsman Daedalus and his son Icarus — that they flew with wings fitted to themselves;
19:46
de Oedipo, quod monstrum quoddam, quae Sphinga dicebatur, humana facie quadrupedem, soluta qua e ab illa proponi soleret uelut insolubili quaestione suo praecipitio perire compulerit; de Antaeo, quem necauit Hercules, quod filius terrae fuerit, propter quod cadens in terram fortior soleret adsurgere; et si qua forte alia praetermisi. Hae fabulae bellum ad usque Troianum, ubi secundum librum Marcus Varro de populi Romani gente finiuit, ex occasione historiarum, quae res ueraciter gestas continent, ita sunt ingeniis hominum fictae, ut non sint opprobriis numinum adfixae.
關於俄狄浦斯——說有一頭怪物,名叫斯芬克斯,四足而人面,慣以看似無解的謎語相問;當那謎被他解開時,他便迫使牠自投深淵而亡;關於安泰俄斯,即赫丘利所殺的那位——說他是大地之子,因這緣故,每當他倒在地上,便慣於更強壯地站起;還有若干或許被我略過的別的。這些神話,直到特洛伊戰爭為止——馬爾庫斯·瓦羅論羅馬民族的第二部書便止於此——乃是取材於那些含有真實事蹟的史載,經人的巧思如此編造出來,以致不致把恥辱加在神明身上。
about Oedipus — that he compelled a certain monster, which was called the Sphinx, four-footed with a human face, to perish by its own headlong fall when the seemingly insoluble riddle that it used to propose was solved by him; about Antaeus, whom Hercules slew — that he was a son of the earth, for which reason, when he fell to the ground, he was wont to rise up stronger; and any others that I may perchance have passed over. These fables, down to the Trojan war — where Marcus Varro ended his second book on the race of the Roman people — were, taking their occasion from histories which contain things truly done, so fashioned by the ingenuity of men that they were not fastened upon the deities as reproaches.
19:47
Porro autem quicumque finxerunt a Ioue ad stuprum raptum pulcherrimum puerum Ganymedem, quod nefas rex Tantalus fecit et Ioui fabula tribuit, uel Danaes per imbrem aureum adpetisse concubitum, ubi intellegitur pudicitia mulieris auro fuisse corrupta, quae illis temporibus uel facta uel ficta sunt, aut facta ab aliis et ficta de Ioue, dici non potest quantum mali de hominum praesumpserint cordibus, quod possent ista patienter ferre mendacia, quae tamen etiam libenter amplexi sunt. qui utique quanto deuotius Iouem colunt, tanto eos, qui haec de illo dicere ausi sunt, seuerius punire debuerunt.
再者,凡是虛構那最俊美的少年伽倪墨得斯被尤庇特擄去以行污穢之事的人——這罪原是坦塔羅斯王所犯,神話卻歸到尤庇特身上——或虛構他藉一場金雨去求與達那厄交合的人(由此可知那婦人的貞潔是被金子敗壞的):無論這些在那些時代或做過或虛構的事,是別人做的而被歸於尤庇特,都無法道盡他們對人心存了何等大的惡念——竟以為人能容忍這樣的謊言,而人卻甚至甘心樂意地接受了。而且他們越是虔誠地敬拜尤庇特,就越當更嚴厲地懲罰那些膽敢如此議論他的人。
Furthermore, whoever invented that the most beautiful boy Ganymede was carried off by Jupiter for defilement — a crime which king Tantalus committed and the fable ascribed to Jupiter — or that he sought intercourse with Danae through a golden shower, where it is understood that the woman's chastity was corrupted by gold: whether these things which were done or feigned in those times were done by others and feigned of Jupiter, it cannot be told how great an evil they presumed upon the hearts of men, in that men could patiently endure such lies, which they nevertheless even gladly embraced. And surely the more devoutly they worshipped Jupiter, the more severely they ought to have punished those who dared to say such things of him.
19:48
Nunc uero non solum eis, qui ista finxerunt, irati non sunt, sed ut talia figmenta etiam in theatris agerent, ipsos deos potius iratos habere timuerunt. His temporibus Latona Apollinem peperit, non illum, cuius oracula solere consuli superius loquebamur, sed illum, qui cum Hercule seruiuit Admeto; qui tamen sic est deus creditus, ut plurimi ac paene omnes unum eundemque Apollinem fuisse opinentur. Tunc et Liber pater bellauit in India, qui multas habuit in exercitu feminas, quae Bacchae appellatae sunt, non tam uirtute nobiles quam furore. Aliqui sane et uictum scribunt istum Liberum et uinctum; nonnulli et occisum in pugna a Perseo, nec ubi fuerit sepultus tacent;
但如今,他們非但不惱怒那些虛構這些事的人,反倒唯恐眾神自己惱怒,除非他們甚至在劇場中把這類虛構搬演出來。在這些時代,拉托娜生了阿波羅——不是我們上文所說其神諭慣被請示的那一位,而是那與赫丘利一同服事阿德墨托斯的那一位;然而他竟被信為神,以致大多數人、幾乎所有人都以為阿波羅只有一位、乃是同一位。那時,李柏爾父神也在印度征戰;他軍中有許多婦女,稱為巴刻,她們著稱的與其說是勇武,不如說是狂亂。誠然有些人甚至寫道,這位李柏爾既被打敗又被綁縛;還有些人說他甚至在戰鬥中被珀耳修斯所殺,且不諱言他葬於何處。
But now, not only were they not angry with those who invented these things, but they feared rather to have the gods themselves angry unless they should perform such fictions even in the theatres. In these times Latona bore Apollo — not the one whose oracles we were speaking above of being wont to be consulted, but the one who served Admetus along with Hercules; who nevertheless was so believed to be a god that most, and almost all, suppose that there was one and the same Apollo. Then also Father Liber made war in India; he had many women in his army, who were called Bacchae, noble not so much for valor as for frenzy. Some indeed even write that this Liber was both conquered and bound; and some that he was even slain in battle by Perseus, nor are they silent about where he was buried.
19:49
et tamen eius uelut dei nomine per inmundos daemones Bacchanalia sacra uel potius sacrilegia sunt instituta, de quorum rabiosa turpitudine post tam multos annos sic senatus erubuit, ut in urbe Roma esse prohiberet. Per ea tempora Perseus et uxor eius Andromeda postea quam sunt mortui, sic eos in caelum receptos esse crediderunt, ut imagines eorum stellis designare eorumque appellare nominibus non erubescerent, non timerent.
然而在他的名下,彷彿他是神一般,藉著污穢的群魔,設立了酒神節的祭禮——或更該說是褻瀆之舉;至於那些祭禮瘋狂的醜穢,元老院在過了那麼多年之後竟深感羞恥,以致禁止它們存在於羅馬城中。在那些時代,珀耳修斯和他妻子安德洛墨達死後,人們竟相信他們被如此接入天上,以致毫不羞恥、也毫不畏懼地以星辰標示他們的形象、並以他們的名字為那些星命名。
And yet under his name, as though he were a god, through unclean demons Bacchanalian rites — or rather sacrileges — were instituted, of whose raving foulness the senate, after so many years, was so ashamed that it forbade them to exist in the city of Rome. In those times Perseus and his wife Andromeda, after they had died, were believed to have been so received into heaven that men were not ashamed, nor afraid, to designate their images with stars and to call them by their names.
19:50
[XIV] Per idem temporis interuallum extiterunt poetae, qui etiam theologi dicerentur, quoniam de diis carmina faciebant, sed talibus diis, qui licet magni homines, tamen homines fuerunt aut mundi huius, quem uerus Deus fecit, elementa sunt aut in principatibus et potestatibus pro uoluntate Creatoris et suis meritis ordinati, et si quid de uno uero Deo inter multa Dana et falsa cecinerint, colendo cum illo alios, qui dii non sunt, eisque exhibendo famulatum, qui uni tantum debetur Deo, non ei utique rite seruierunt nec a fabuloso deorum suorum dedecore etiam ipsi se abstinere potuerunt — Orpheus, Musaeus, Linus. Verum isti theologi deos coluerunt, non pro diis culti sunt;
在同一段時期,興起了一些也被稱為神學家的詩人,因為他們作詩詠唱眾神——但所詠的是這樣的神:他們雖是偉人,卻終究是人,或是真神所造這世界的元素,或是照造物主的旨意及自身的功過而被列在諸執政的、掌權的之中;縱使他們在諸多無稽而虛假之事中偶爾詠唱了關於獨一真神的內容,然而他們既與祂一同敬拜別的——那些並非神的——又把唯獨當歸給神的敬奉獻給它們,便並未正當地真正事奉祂,他們自己也無法避開為本族眾神所編造的醜行:俄耳甫斯、穆賽俄斯、里諾斯。但這些神學家是敬拜眾神的人,他們自己並未被當作神來敬拜。
During the same interval of time there arose poets who were also called theologians, because they composed songs about the gods — but about such gods as, although great men, were nevertheless men, or are elements of this world which the true God made, or were ordained among the principalities and powers according to the will of the Creator and their own merits; and if they sang anything about the one true God amid much that was worthless and false, yet by worshipping others along with him — others that are not gods — and by rendering to them the service that is owed to God alone, they did not truly serve him rightly, nor could they themselves refrain from the fabulous disgrace of their own gods: Orpheus, Musaeus, Linus. But these theologians worshipped the gods; they were not themselves worshipped as gods.
19:51
quamuis Orpheum nescio quo modo infernis sacris uel potius sacrilegiis praeficere soleat ciuitas impiorum. Vxor autem regis Athamantis, quae uocabatur Ino, et eius filius Melicertes praecipitio spontaneo in mari perierunt et opinione hominum in deos relati sunt, sicut alii homines eorum temporum, Castor et Pollux. Illam sane Melicertis matrem Leucothean Graeci, Matutam Latini uocauerunt, utrique tamen putantes deam. [XV] Per ea tempora regnum finitum est Argiuorum, translatum ad Mycenas, unde fuit Agamemnon, et exortum est regnum Laurentum, ubi Saturni filius Picus regnum primus accepit, iudicante apud Hebraeos femina Debbora; sed per illam Dei spiritus id agebat;
雖然不敬虔者之城不知怎地慣把俄耳甫斯立為那陰間祭禮——或更該說褻瀆之舉——的主持者。至於阿塔瑪斯王的妻子,名叫伊諾,和她的兒子墨利刻耳忒斯,二人自願投海而亡,卻按世人的看法被列在眾神之中,正如那時代其他的人卡斯托耳和波路克斯一樣。墨利刻耳忒斯的這位母親,希臘人稱她為琉科忒亞,拉丁人稱她為瑪圖塔,兩者卻都以為她是女神。在那些時代,阿爾戈斯人的王國告終,遷移到邁錫尼,阿伽門農便是出於此地;而勞倫圖姆的王國興起,撒圖爾努斯之子皮庫斯在那裡首先承受王位,那時希伯來人中有一位婦人底波拉作士師——但神的靈藉著她行這事;
although the city of the impious is somehow wont to set Orpheus over the infernal rites — or rather sacrileges. But the wife of king Athamas, who was called Ino, and her son Melicertes perished by a voluntary plunge into the sea, and by the opinion of men were reckoned among the gods, just as other men of those times, Castor and Pollux. That mother of Melicertes the Greeks called Leucothea, the Latins Matuta, both nevertheless supposing her a goddess. In those times the kingdom of the Argives came to an end, being transferred to Mycenae, whence came Agamemnon; and the kingdom of the Laurentes arose, where Picus, son of Saturn, first received the kingdom, while among the Hebrews a woman, Deborah, was judging — but through her the Spirit of God was doing this;
19:52
nam etiam prophetissa erat, cuius prophetia minus aperta est, quam ut possimus eam sine diuturna expositione de Christo demonstrare prolatam. Iam ergo regnabant Laurentes utique in Italia, ex quibus euidentior ducitur origo Romana post Graecos; et tamen adhuc regnum Assyrium permanebat, ubi erat rex uicensimus et tertius Lampares, cum primus Laurentum Picus esse coepisset. De huius Pici patre Saturno uiderint quid sentiant talium deorum cultores, qui negant hominem fuisse; de quo et alii scripserunt, quod ante Picum filium suum in Italia ipse regnauerit, et Vergilius notioribus litteris dicit:
因為她甚至是一位女先知,只是她的預言不夠明晰,我們無法不加長篇解釋便顯明它是為基督而發的。如今勞倫圖姆人確已在意大利作王,繼希臘人之後,羅馬更明顯的起源由他們而來;然而亞述的王國仍然存留,那裡有第二十三位王蘭帕瑞斯在位,那時皮庫斯剛開始作勞倫圖姆人的第一位王。至於這皮庫斯之父撒圖爾努斯,就讓這類神明的敬拜者自去想他們對他的看法罷——他們否認他曾是人;也有別人寫過,他曾在其子皮庫斯之前於意大利為王,維吉爾更以他那眾所熟知的詩句說道:
for she was even a prophetess, whose prophecy is less clear than that we could show, without a lengthy exposition, that it was uttered concerning Christ. Now then the Laurentes were already reigning, indeed in Italy, from whom, after the Greeks, the more evident origin of Rome is derived; and yet the Assyrian kingdom still remained, where there was the twenty-third king Lampares, when Picus had begun to be the first of the Laurentes. As for Saturn, the father of this Picus, let the worshippers of such gods see what they think of him, who deny that he was a man — of whom others also have written that he reigned in Italy before his son Picus, and Virgil says in his well-known verses:
19:53
Is genus indocile et dispersum montibus altis Composuit legesque dedit Latiumque uocari Maluit, his quoniam latuisset tutus in oris. Aurea quae perhibent illo sub rege fuere Saecula. Sed haec poetica opinentur esse figmenta et Pici patrem Stercen potius fuisse adseuerent, a quo peritissimo agricola inuentum ferunt, ut fimo animalium agri fecundarentur, quod ab eius nomine stercus est dictum; hunc quidam Stercutium uocatum ferunt. Qualibet autem ex causa eum Saturnum appellare uoluerint, certe tamen hunc Stercen siue Stercutium merito agriculturae fecerunt deum. Picum quoque similiter eius filium in talium deorum numerum receperunt, quem praeclarum augurem et belligeratorem fuisse asserunt.
「正是他,把那馴化不了、散居於崇山峻嶺之間的族類聚集起來,賜給他們律法,並選定要稱這地為拉丁姆,因為在這海岸他曾平安藏身。人們所傳說的黃金時代,正是在那位王的治下。」但就讓他們把這些當作詩人的虛構罷,並且倒不如斷言皮庫斯之父乃是斯忒耳刻斯——相傳這位極精於農事的人發明了以牲畜的糞肥沃田地之法,這糞便從他的名字而稱為 stercus(糞);有些人說他被稱為斯忒耳庫提烏斯。然而,無論他們出於何種緣故要稱他為撒圖爾努斯,他們確實因農事之故理當把這位斯忒耳刻斯或斯忒耳庫提烏斯尊為神。同樣,他們也把他兒子皮庫斯列入這類神明之數,並斷言他曾是一位卓越的占卜者和善戰者。
'He it was who gathered together a race untamed and scattered over the high mountains, and gave them laws, and chose that it be called Latium, since in these shores he had lain hidden in safety. The golden ages which they tell of were under that king.' But let them suppose these to be poetic fictions, and let them rather assert that the father of Picus was Sterces, by whom, a most skilled farmer, it is said the practice was discovered of making fields fruitful with the dung of animals, which from his name was called stercus (dung); some report that he was called Stercutius. Yet for whatever reason they chose to call him Saturn, certainly they made this Sterces or Stercutius a god deservedly for agriculture. Picus likewise, his son, they received into the number of such gods, whom they assert to have been a distinguished augur and warrior.
19:54
Picus Faunum genuit, Laurentum regem secundum; etiam iste deus illis uel est uel fuit. Hos ante Troianum bellum diuinos honores mortuis hominibus detulerunt. [XVI] Troia uero euersa excidio illo usquequaque cantato puerisque notissimo, quod et magnitudine sui et scriptorum excellentibus linguis insigniter diffamatum atque uulgatum est gestumque regnante iam Latino Fauni filio, ex quo Latinorum regnum dici coepit Laurentumque cessauit, Graeci uictores deletam Troiam relinquentes et ad propria remeantes diuersis et horrendis cladibus dilacerati atque contriti sunt; et tamen etiam ex eis deorum suorum numerum auxerunt.
皮庫斯生了法烏努斯,勞倫圖姆的第二位王;他對他們而言,也是、或曾是一位神。這些人雖是死人,卻在特洛伊戰爭之前被授予神明的尊榮。但當特洛伊被那場處處傳唱、連孩童也極熟知的毀滅所傾覆——那毀滅無論以其本身的浩大,抑或藉眾作者卓越的辭章,都顯著地傳揚開來、廣為人知;而它成就之時,法烏努斯之子拉丁努斯已在位,由他起王國開始稱為拉丁人的王國、勞倫圖姆的王國則告終——得勝的希臘人在丟下被毀的特洛伊、返回自己家鄉之際,卻被種種可怖的災禍撕裂輾碎;然而他們竟連從這些人中也增添了自己眾神的數目。
Picus begot Faunus, the second king of the Laurentes; he too is, or was, a god to them. These men, before the Trojan war, they conferred divine honors upon, though they were dead men. But when Troy was overthrown by that destruction sung of everywhere and most well known to boys — which both by its own magnitude and by the excellent tongues of writers has been notably spread abroad and made common, and was accomplished when Latinus son of Faunus was already reigning, from whom the kingdom began to be called that of the Latins and that of the Laurentes ceased — the victorious Greeks, leaving Troy destroyed and returning to their own homes, were torn apart and crushed by various and horrible disasters; and yet even from among these they increased the number of their gods.
19:55
Nam et Diomeden fecerunt deum, quem poena diuinitus inrogata perhibent ad suos non reuertisse; eiusque socios in uolucres fuisse conuersos non fabuloso poeticoque mendacio, sed historica adtestatione confirmant; quibus nec deus, ut putant, factus humanam reuocare naturam uel ipse potuit uel certe a Ioue suo rege tamquam caelicola nouicius impetrauit. quin etiam templum eius esse aiunt in insula Diomedea, non longe a monte Gargano, qui est in Apulia, et hoc templum circumuolare atque incolere has alites tam mirabili obsequio, ut aquam impleant et aspergant; et eo si Graeci uenerint uel Graecorum stirpe prognati, non solum quietas esse, uerum et insuper adulare;
因為他們甚至把狄俄墨得斯尊為神;他們說,由於神所加的懲罰,他從未回到自己的人民那裡;並且他們確認——不是憑荒誕的、詩人的謊言,而是憑歷史的佐證——他的同伴變成了飛鳥;照他們所想,他即使被封為神,也無法使他們恢復人性,無論是靠他自己,抑或作為天界的新來者向他的王尤庇特求得。不但如此,他們還說在狄俄墨得亞島上有他的一座廟宇,離阿普利亞的加爾加努斯山不遠,並說這些飛鳥繞這廟宇飛翔、棲居於此,帶著如此奇妙的順服,竟以喙盛水加以潑灑;若有希臘人來到那裡,或希臘族裔所生的人,牠們不但安靜,甚至還向他們獻媚;
For they made even Diomedes a god, whom they report never returned to his own people because of a punishment divinely inflicted; and they confirm — not by a fabulous and poetic lie, but by historical attestation — that his companions were turned into birds; whom, as they suppose, he could not, even after being made a god, recall to human nature, either himself, or at least obtain it as a new-comer among the celestials from Jupiter his king. Nay more, they say that there is a temple of his on the island of Diomedea, not far from Mount Garganus, which is in Apulia, and that these birds fly about this temple and dwell there with so wonderful an obeisance that they fill their beaks with water and sprinkle it; and if Greeks come there, or those sprung from Greek stock, they are not only quiet but even, besides, fawn upon them;
19:56
si autem alienigenas uiderint, subuolare ad capita tamque grauibus ictibus, ut etiam perimant, uulnerare. Nam duris et grandibus rostris satis ad haec proelia perhibentur armatae. [XVII] Hoc Varro ut astruat, commemorat alia non minus incredibilia de illa maga famosissima Circe, quae socios quoque Vlixis mutauit in bestias, et de Arcadibus, qui sorte ducti tranabant quoddam stagnum atque ibi conuertebantur in lupos et cum similibus feris per illius regionis deserta uiuebant. Si autem carne non uescerentur humana, rursus post nouem annos eodem renatato stagno reformabantur in homines.
但牠們若看見外邦人,便向他們的頭上撲去,以那樣沉重的擊打刺傷他們,甚至把他們殺死。因為據說牠們以堅硬碩大的喙,足夠武裝以應這些搏鬥。瓦羅為證實此事,又提到一些同樣難以置信的事,是關於那極出名的女巫喀耳刻的——她也把尤利西斯的同伴變成了野獸;還有關於阿卡狄亞人的——他們憑抽籤被選中,游過某一池塘,在那裡變成狼,並在那地區的荒野中與同類的野獸一同生活。但他們若不吃人肉,過了九年,再游回那同一池塘,就重新變回人。
but if they see foreigners, they fly up at their heads and wound them with such heavy blows that they even kill them. For with hard and large beaks they are said to be sufficiently armed for these combats. Varro, to establish this, mentions other things no less incredible about that most notorious sorceress Circe, who also changed the companions of Ulysses into beasts, and about the Arcadians who, chosen by lot, would swim across a certain pool and there be turned into wolves and live with similar wild beasts through the deserts of that region. But if they did not feed on human flesh, then after nine years, by swimming back across the same pool, they were reformed into men.
19:57
Denique etiam nominatim expressit quendam Demaenetum gustasse de sacrificio, quod Arcades immolato puero deo suo Lycaeo facere solerent, et in lupum fuisse mutatum et anno decimo in figuram propriam restitutum pugilatum sese exercuisse et Olympiaco uicisse certamine. Nec idem propter aliud arbitratur historicus in Arcadia tale nomen adfictum Pani Lycaeo et Ioui Lycaeo nisi propter hanc in lupos hominum mutationem, quod eam nisi ui diuina fieri non putarent. Lupus enim Graece *lu/kos dicitur, unde Lycaei nomen apparet inflexum. Romanos etiam Lupercos ex illorum mysteriorum ueluti semine dicit exortos.
最後,他甚至指名說出某位得邁涅托斯,此人嘗了阿卡狄亞人慣以殺獻一男孩獻給他們的神呂卡俄斯的那祭物,便變成了狼,第十年恢復本形,操練拳擊,並在奧林匹克競技中獲勝。同一位史家也認為,阿卡狄亞之所以把這樣的名字加給呂卡俄斯的潘和呂卡俄斯的尤庇特,別無他故,正是因為這人變狼之事,因為他們以為此事非藉神力不能成就。原來「狼」在希臘文中稱為 lykos,呂卡俄斯之名顯然由此變化而來。他說羅馬的盧珀爾庫斯祭司也是從那些奧祕之禮的種子、彷彿由此萌生的。
Finally he even expressed by name a certain Demaenetus, who tasted of the sacrifice which the Arcadians were wont to make to their god Lycaeus by immolating a boy, and was changed into a wolf, and in the tenth year was restored to his own shape, practised boxing, and won in the Olympic contest. Nor does the same historian think that such a name was attached in Arcadia to Pan Lycaeus and Jupiter Lycaeus for any other reason than on account of this transformation of men into wolves, since they thought it could not happen except by divine power. For 'wolf' in Greek is called lykos, whence the name Lycaeus appears to be derived by inflection. He says that the Roman Luperci also arose from a kind of seed, as it were, of those mysteries.
19:58
[XVIII] Sed de ista tanta ludificatione daemonum nos quid dicamus, qui haec legent, fortassis expectent. Et quid dicemus, nisi de medio Babylonis esse fugiendum? Quod praeceptum propheticum ita spiritaliter intellegitur, ut de huius saeculi ciuitate, quae profecto et angelorum et hominum societas impiorum est, fidei passibus, quae per dilectionem operatur, in Deum uiuum proficiendo fugiamus. Quanto quippe in haec ima potestatem daemonum maiorem uidemus, tanto tenacius Mediatori est inhaerendum, per quem de imis ad summa conscendimus. Si enim dixerimus ea non esse credenda, non desunt etiam nunc, qui eius modi quaedam uel certissima audisse uel etiam expertos se esse adseuerent.
但至於群魔這樣大的戲弄,或許讀這些事的人正等著看我們有何話說。我們能說什麼呢?無非是說:我們必須從巴比倫當中逃出來!這句先知的訓諭,是這樣按屬靈的意思來領會的:我們當藉著信心的步伐——這信心是藉愛而運行的——脫離這今世之城(它確是不敬虔的天使與人的社會),向著永生的神長進而逃離。因為我們越是看見群魔在這些最卑下之事上權勢越大,就越當更牢牢地緊靠那位中保,藉著祂我們才得從最卑下的升到最高的。因為我們若說這些事不足信,如今仍不乏有人斷言:他們曾聽見過、甚或親身經歷過此類最確鑿無疑的事。
But as to this so great mockery of the demons, perhaps those who shall read these things await what we may say. And what shall we say, except that we must flee out of the midst of Babylon? This prophetic precept is understood spiritually in this way: that by the steps of faith, which works through love, we should flee toward the living God by advancing away from the city of this world, which is assuredly a society of impious angels and men. For the greater we see the power of demons to be in these lowest things, the more tenaciously must we cling to the Mediator, through whom we ascend from the lowest to the highest. For if we should say that these things are not to be believed, there are not lacking even now those who assert that they have heard, or even themselves experienced, certain things of this kind as most certain.
19:59
Nam et nos cum essemus in Italia audiebamus talia de quadam regione illarum partium, ubi stabularias mulieres inbutas his malis artibus in caseo dare solere dicebant quibus uellent seu possent uiatoribus, unde in iumenta ilico uerterentur et necessaria quaeque portarent postque perfuncta opera iterum ad se redirent; nec tamen in eis mentem fieri bestialem, sed rationalem humanamque seruari, sicut Apuleius in libris, quos asini aurei titulo inscripsit, sibi ipsi accidisse, ut accepto ueneno humano animo permanente asinus fieret, aut indicauit aut finxit. Haec uel falsa sunt uel tam inusitata, ut merito non credantur.
因為連我們,當我們在意大利時,也常聽說那些地方某一地區的這類事:他們說有些開客店的婦人,浸淫於這些邪術,慣把某物放在乳酪中給她們所願、或所能如此擺佈的旅客吃,於是那人立刻變成馱獸,馱運各樣所需的貨物,事畢之後又變回自己;然而他們的心思並未在其中變得如獸,倒仍保有理性而屬人的心思——正如阿普列烏斯在他題名為《金驢記》的書中,或記述、或虛構為自己所遭遇的:說他服了藥後,人的心思仍存,卻變成了一頭驢。這些事若非虛假,便是太過離奇,理當不予相信。
For we too, when we were in Italy, used to hear such things about a certain region of those parts, where they said that women who kept inns, steeped in these evil arts, were wont to give something in cheese to travellers whom they wished, or were able, so to affect, whereby they were straightway turned into beasts of burden and carried whatever necessary loads, and after the tasks were done returned again to themselves; nor yet was their mind made bestial in them, but a rational and human mind was preserved — just as Apuleius, in the books which he entitled 'The Golden Ass,' either related or feigned to have happened to himself, that upon taking poison, while his human mind remained, he became an ass. These things are either false, or so unusual that they are with reason not believed.
19:60
Firmissime tamen credendum est omnipotentem Deum posse omnia facere quae uoluerit, siue uindicando siue praestando, nec daemones aliquid operari secundum naturae suae potentiam (quia et ipsa angelica creatura est, licet proprio uitio sit maligna) nisi quod ille permiserit, cuius iudicia occulta sunt multa, iniusta nulla. Nec sane daemones naturas creant, si aliquid tale faciunt, de qualibus factis ista uertitur quaestio; sed specie tenus, quae a uero Deo sunt creata, commutant, ut uideantur esse quod non sunt.
然而必須最堅定地相信:全能的神能行祂所願的一切,無論是懲罰或是賜予;而群魔照其本性的能力所行的,並非什麼都能——因為那本性也是天使的受造物,雖因自身的過犯而成為惡的——它們所行的,無非是那位允許之者所准許的,祂的判斷許多是隱祕的,卻沒有一件是不義的。群魔也決不能創造本性;縱使它們行出這類事來(就是這問題所論的那類作為),也不過是就外貌上改變真神所造之物,使物看似其所不是的樣子。
Yet it is to be most firmly believed that Almighty God can do all things that He wills, whether in punishing or in bestowing; and that the demons work nothing according to the power of their own nature (for that nature too is an angelic creature, although by its own fault it is malignant) except what He shall have permitted, whose judgments are many hidden, none unjust. Nor indeed do the demons create natures, if they do any such thing as those deeds are about which this question turns; but only in appearance do they alter what has been created by the true God, so that things may seem to be what they are not.
19:61
Non itaque solum animum, sed ne corpus quidem ulla ratione crediderim daemonum arte uel potestate in membra et liniamenta bestialia ueraciter posse conuerti, sed phantasticum hominis, quod etiam cogitando siue somniando per rerum innumerabilia genera uariatur et, cum corpus non sit, corporum tamen similes mira celeritate formas capit, sopitis aut oppressis corporeis hominis sensibus ad aliorum sensum nescio quo ineffabili modo figura corporea posse perduci; ita ut corpora ipsa hominum alicubi iaceant, uiuentia quidem, sed multo grauius atque uehementius quam somno suis sensibus obseratis;
因此我決不相信:藉群魔的技倆或權能,不僅人的心思,連人的身體,都能以任何方式真正變成獸類的肢體與相貌;而只相信人的那幻象——它甚至在思想或作夢時,也在無數種事物之間變幻,且雖非身體,卻以奇妙的迅捷取得形似身體的種種形狀——當那人肉身的感官被催眠或被壓制時,能藉某種我不知其名的難以言喻之法,以一種形體之形,被引現到別人的感知面前;以致那些人的身體本身臥在某處,確是活著的,但其感官被封閉,遠比睡眠更沉重、更劇烈;
I would therefore in no way believe that not only the mind, but not even the body, can by any means, by the art or power of the demons, be truly changed into the limbs and features of a beast; but that the phantasm of a man — which even in thinking or dreaming is varied through innumerable kinds of things and, though it is not a body, yet takes on shapes resembling bodies with wonderful swiftness — can, when the bodily senses of the man are lulled or oppressed, be brought forth, in a bodily form, to the perception of others by some ineffable manner I know not; so that the very bodies of the men lie somewhere, living indeed, but with their senses locked far more heavily and violently than in sleep;
19:62
phantasticum autem illud ueluti corporatum in alicuius animalis effigie appareat sensibus alienis talisque etiam sibi esse homo uideatur, sicut talis sibi uideri posset in somnis, et portare onera, quae onera si uera.sunt corpora, portantur a daemonibus, ut inludatur hominibus, partim uero onerum corpora, partim iumentorum falsa cernentibus. Nam quidam nomine Praestantius patri suo contigisse indicabat, ut uenenum illud per caseum in domo sua sumeret et iaceret in lecto suo quasi dormiens, qui tamen nullo modo poterat excitari.
與此同時,那幻象彷彿以某種動物之形化成了形體,顯現在別人的感官面前,那人甚至覺得自己也是這樣,正如一個人在夢中會覺得自己是這樣一般,並且馱運重擔——這些重擔若是真實的身體,便是由群魔馱運,好戲弄人,叫人一面看見重擔真實的身體,一面看見馱獸虛假的身體。因為有一位名叫普賴斯坦提烏斯的人報告說,這事臨到了他自己的父親:他在自己家中把那放在乳酪裡的藥物吃下,便像睡著似地臥在自己床上,然而怎樣也叫不醒。
while that phantasm, as it were made corporeal in the likeness of some animal, appears to the senses of others, and the man may even seem such to himself, just as one might seem such to oneself in dreams, and may carry loads — which loads, if they are true bodies, are carried by the demons, that men may be mocked, seeing in part the true bodies of the loads, in part the false bodies of the beasts of burden. For a certain man by the name of Praestantius reported that this had befallen his own father: that he took that poison in cheese in his own house and lay on his bed as though sleeping, who nevertheless could by no means be roused.
19:63
Post aliquot autem dies eum uelut euigilasse dicebat et quasi somnia narrasse quae passus est, caballum se scilicet factum annonam inter alia iumenta baiulasse militibus, quae dicitur Retica, quoniam ad Retias deportatur. Quod ita, ut narrauit, factum fuisse compertum est; quae tamen ei sua somnia uidebantur. Indicauit et alius se domi suae per noctem, antequam requiesceret, uidisse uenientem ad se philosophum quendam sibi notissimum sibique exposuisse nonnulla Platonica, quae antea rogatus exponere noluisset. Et cum ab eodem philosopho quaesitum fuisset, cur in domo eius fecerit, quod in domo sua petenti negauerat:
但過了幾天,他說他父親彷彿醒了過來,並彷彿把自己所遭受的事當作夢來述說:就是他被變成一匹馬,在別的馱獸中間為兵士馱運穀糧,那些糧食稱為雷提亞糧,因為是運往雷提亞的。而經查證,此事果如他所述那樣發生了;然而在他看來,這卻是他自己的夢。另有一人也報告說,他在自己家中,於夜間就寢之前,看見某位他極熟識的哲學家來到他這裡,向他講解柏拉圖的若干要點——這些要點先前有人求問時,那哲學家曾拒絕講解。當有人問這同一位哲學家:為何在別人家中做了在自己家中被求問時所拒絕做的事,
But after some days he said that his father had, as it were, awakened and had, as it were, narrated as dreams the things he had suffered: namely that he had been made a horse and, among other beasts of burden, had carried grain-provisions for the soldiers, provisions which are called Rhaetic, because they are transported to Rhaetia. And it was ascertained that this had happened just as he related; which nevertheless seemed to him to be his own dreams. Another also reported that at his own house, during the night, before he went to rest, he had seen a certain philosopher, very well known to him, coming to him and expounding to him some points of Plato which, when previously asked, he had refused to expound. And when it was asked of this same philosopher why he had done in the other's house what he had refused when asked in his own house:
19:64
"Non feci, inquit, sed me fecisse somniaui." Ac per hoc alteri per imaginem phantasticam exhibitum est uigilanti, quod alter uidit in somnis. Haec ad nos non quibuscumque, qualibus credere putaremus indignum, sed eis referentibus peruenerunt, quos nobis non existimaremus fuisse mentitos. Proinde quod homines dicuntur mandatumque est litteris ab diis uel potius daemonibus Arcadibus in lupos solere conuerti, et quod Carminibus Circe socios mutauit Vlixi, secundum istum modum mihi uidetur fieri potuisse, quem dixi, si tamen factum est.
他說:「我並沒有做,我只是夢見我做了。」由此可見,藉一幻象的影像,向一個醒著的人所顯現的,正是另一個人在夢中所見的。這些事臨到我們,並非出於什麼隨便的人(我們會覺得信這種人不值),而是由那些我們不會以為對我們說謊的人所報告的。因此,關於相傳、且已載於文字的、說有人慣被阿卡狄亞人的神——或更該說群魔——變成狼,以及喀耳刻藉咒語把尤利西斯的同伴變化了——在我看來,這若果真發生過,也可能是按我所描述的那種方式成就的。
'I did not do it,' he said, 'but I dreamed that I did it.' And by this, there was exhibited to one man, waking, through a phantasmal image, what the other saw in dreams. These things came to us not from any chance persons, such as we should think it unworthy to believe, but reported by those whom we would not suppose to have lied to us. Accordingly, as to what men are said — and it has been committed to writing — to be wont to be turned into wolves by the gods, or rather demons, of the Arcadians, and that by her incantations Circe changed the companions of Ulysses, it seems to me that it could have been done after that manner which I have described, if indeed it was done at all.
19:65
Diomedeas autem uolucres, quando quidem genus earum per successionem propaginis durare perhibetur, non mutatis hominibus factas, sed subtractis credo fuisse suppositas, sicut cerua pro Iphigenia, regis Agamemnonis filia. Neque enim daemonibus iudicio Dei permissis huius modi praestigiae difficiles esse potuerunt; sed quia illa uirgo postea uiua reperta est, suppositam pro illa esse ceruam facile cognitum est. Socii uero Diomedis quia nusquam subito conparuerunt et postea nullo loco apparuerunt, perdentibus eos ultoribus angelis malis, in eas aues, quae pro illis sunt occulte ex aliis locis, ubi est hoc genus auium, ad ea loca perductae ac repente suppositae, creduntur esse conuersi.
但至於狄俄墨得斯的那些飛鳥,既然據說牠們的種類是藉後代的繁衍而延續下來,我便相信牠們並非由變化了的人所成,而是在那些人被暗中撤走之後被替換來的——正如有一頭母鹿被替換來頂替阿伽門農王的女兒伊菲革涅亞一樣。因為當群魔蒙神的判斷所准許時,這類的把戲對它們並非難事;但因那童女後來被發現還活著,人便容易看出是有一頭母鹿被替換來頂替她的。至於狄俄墨得斯的同伴,因為他們並未在某處忽然出現、其後又在任何地方都不再出現——那些施行報應的惡天使把他們毀滅了——人便相信他們是變成了那些飛鳥;那些鳥乃是從別處(就是有這類飛鳥的地方)被暗中帶到那些地方、忽然被替換來頂替他們的。
But as for the Diomedean birds, since indeed their species is said to endure through the succession of offspring, I believe that they were not made from changed men, but were substituted when the men had been secretly withdrawn — just as a hind was substituted for Iphigenia, the daughter of king Agamemnon. Nor indeed could tricks of this kind have been difficult for the demons when permitted by the judgment of God; but because that maiden was afterward found alive, it was easily recognized that a hind had been substituted for her. But the companions of Diomedes, because they nowhere suddenly appeared and afterward appeared in no place — the evil avenging angels destroying them — are believed to have been turned into those birds which were secretly substituted for them, brought from other places where this kind of bird exists, to those places, and suddenly put in their stead.
19:66
Quod autem Diomedis templo aquam rostris afferunt et aspergunt, et quod blandiuntur Graecigenis atque alienigenas persequuntur, mirandum non est fieri daemonum instinctu, quorum interest persuadere deum factum esse Diomeden ad decipiendos homines, ut falsos deos cum ueri Dei iniuria multos colant et hominibus mortuis, qui nec cum uiuerent uere uixerunt, templis altaribus, sacrificiis sacerdotibus (quae omnia cum recta sunt non nisi uni Deo uiuo et uero debentur) inseruiant.
但至於牠們用喙把水帶到狄俄墨得斯的廟宇並加以潑灑,又對希臘出身的人獻媚、逼迫外邦人——這乃是出於群魔的慫恿,不足為奇;因為叫人相信狄俄墨得斯已被封為神,正合它們的利益,好欺哄世人,使人得罪真神而敬拜眾多的假神,並以廟宇、祭壇、祭祀、祭司(凡這一切若是正當的,便無不當唯獨歸與那位又活又真的獨一之神)去事奉那些死人——那些人即使活著時也未曾真正活過。
But that they bring water in their beaks to the temple of Diomedes and sprinkle it, and that they fawn upon those of Greek birth and persecute foreigners, it is not to be wondered at that this is done by the instigation of the demons, whose interest it is to persuade men that Diomedes has been made a god, in order to deceive men, so that they may worship many false gods to the injury of the true God, and may render service — with temples, altars, sacrifices, and priests, all of which, when they are right, are owed to none but the one living and true God — to dead men who, even while they lived, did not truly live.
19:67
[XIX] Eo tempore post captam Troiam atque deletam Aeneas cum uiginti nauibus, quibus portabantur reliquiae Troianorum, in Italiam uenit, regnante ibi Latino et apud Athenienses Menestheo, apud Sicyonios Polyphide, apud Assyrios Tautane, apud Hebraeos autem iudex Labdon fuit. Mortuo autem Latino regnauit Aeneas tribus annis, eisdem in supradictis locis manentibus regibus, nisi quod Sicyoniorum iam Pelasgus erat et Hebraeorum iudex Samson; qui cum mirabiliter fortis esset, putatus est Hercules. Sed Aenean, quoniam quando mortuus est non conparuit, deum sibi fecerunt Latini. Sabini etiam regem suum primum Sancum siue, ut aliqui appellant, Sanctum, rettulerunt in deos.
在那時,特洛伊被攻取、被毀滅之後,埃涅阿斯帶著二十艘船來到意大利,船上載著特洛伊人的餘民,那時拉丁努斯正在那裡為王,雅典人中墨涅斯透斯在位,西基昂人中波呂菲得斯在位,亞述人中陶塔涅斯在位,而希伯來人中士師則是拉頓。拉丁努斯死後,埃涅阿斯作王三年,上述各地的列王依舊如故,只是西基昂人中此時已是佩拉斯戈斯,希伯來人的士師則是參孫;參孫因奇妙地強壯,竟被人以為是赫丘利。但因埃涅阿斯死時並未現形,拉丁人便為自己把他尊為神。撒賓人也把他們的第一位王桑庫斯——或如有些人所稱,桑克圖斯——列入眾神之中。
At that time, after Troy had been captured and destroyed, Aeneas came into Italy with twenty ships, in which were carried the remnants of the Trojans, while Latinus was reigning there, and among the Athenians Menestheus, among the Sicyonians Polyphides, among the Assyrians Tautanes, but among the Hebrews Labdon was judge. And when Latinus had died, Aeneas reigned three years, the same kings remaining in the above-said places, except that among the Sicyonians it was now Pelasgus, and the judge of the Hebrews was Samson; who, since he was marvellously strong, was thought to be Hercules. But because Aeneas, when he died, did not appear, the Latins made him a god for themselves. The Sabines also enrolled among the gods their first king Sancus, or, as some call him, Sanctus.
19:68
Per idem tempus Codrus rex Atheniensium Peloponnensibus eiusdem hostibus ciuitatis se interficiendum ignotus obiecit; et factum est. Hoc modo eum praedicant patriam liberasse. Responsum enim acceperant Peloponnenses tum demum se superaturos, si eorum regem non occidissent. Fefellit ergo eos habitu pauperis apparendo et in suam necem per iurgium prouocando. Vnde ait Vergilius: Et iurgia Codri. Et hunc Athenienses tamquam deum sacrificiorum honore coluerunt.
約在同一時期,雅典人的王科德魯斯不被認出,把自己交給那城的敵人伯羅奔尼撒人去殺害;事情果真如此發生了。人們就這樣傳頌他解放了祖國。原來伯羅奔尼撒人曾得到神諭,說他們唯有不殺雅典人的王,才終能取勝。因此他扮作窮人的模樣出現,並藉爭吵挑起別人殺他,藉此欺瞞了他們。所以維吉爾說:「還有科德魯斯的爭吵。」雅典人便如敬神一般,以祭祀之禮尊崇他。
Around this same time Codrus, king of the Athenians, exposed himself unrecognized to the Peloponnesians, the enemies of that same city, to be killed; and so it came about. In this way they proclaim that he liberated his fatherland. For the Peloponnesians had received an oracle that they would prevail only then, if they had not slain the king of the Athenians. He therefore deceived them by appearing in the garb of a poor man and by provoking his own death through a quarrel. Whence Virgil says: 'And the brawls of Codrus.' And this man the Athenians honored, as though a god, with the tribute of sacrifices.
19:69
Quarto Latinorum rege Siluio Aeneae filio, non de Creusa, de qua fuit Ascanius, qui tertius ibi regnauit, sed de Lauinia Latini filia, quem postumum Aeneas dicitur habuisse, Assyriorum autem uicensimo et nono Oneo et Melantho Atheniensium sexto decimo, iudice autem Hebraeorum Heli sacerdote regnum Sicyoniorum consumptum est, quod per annos nongentos quinquaginta et nouem traditur fuisse porrectum. [XX] Mox eisdem per loca memorata regnantibus Israelitarum regnum finito tempore iudicum a Saule rege sumpsit exordium, quo tempore fuit propheta Samuel. Ab illo igitur tempore hi reges Latinorum esse coeperunt, quos cognominabant Siluios;
在拉丁人第四位王西爾維烏斯在位時——他是埃涅阿斯的兒子,卻不是由克瑞烏薩所生(阿斯卡尼烏斯是她所生,在那裡作第三位王),而是由拉丁努斯的女兒拉維尼婭所生,據說是埃涅阿斯的遺腹子——當時亞述人正處於第二十九代王奧涅烏斯的統治,雅典人則在第十六代王墨蘭圖斯之下,而希伯來人由祭司以利作士師之時,西錫安人的王國告終,據傳這王國延續了九百五十九年之久。[二十] 不久,當這些王仍統治著上述諸地時,以色列人的王國在士師時代結束後,從掃羅王開始興起,那時撒母耳作先知。因此,從那時起這些拉丁人的王便興起,人稱他們為西爾維烏斯家族;
In the reign of Silvius, the fourth king of the Latins—the son of Aeneas, not by Creusa, from whom came Ascanius who reigned there as the third king, but by Lavinia the daughter of Latinus, whom Aeneas is said to have had as a posthumous son—and in the twenty-ninth reign of the Assyrians under Oneus, and the sixteenth of the Athenians under Melanthus, and while Eli the priest was judge of the Hebrews, the kingdom of the Sicyonians came to an end, which is reported to have been extended over nine hundred and fifty-nine years. [XX] Soon, while these same kings were reigning over the places mentioned, the kingdom of the Israelites, the time of the judges being ended, took its beginning from king Saul, in whose time Samuel was prophet. From that time, then, these kings of the Latins began to be, whom they surnamed the Silvii;
19:70
ab eo quippe, qui filius Aeneae primus dictus est Siluius, ceteris subsecutis et propria nomina inponebantur et hoc non defuit cognomentum; sicut longe postea Caesares cognominati sunt, qui successerunt Caesari Augusto. Reprobato autem Saule, ne quisquam ex eius stirpe regnaret, eoque defuncto Dauid successit in regnum post annos a Saulis imperio quadraginta. Tunc Athenienses habere deinde reges post Codri interitum destiterunt et magistratus habere coeperunt administrandae rei publicae. Post Dauid, qui etiam ipse quadraginta regnauit annos, filius eius Salomon rex Israelitarum fuit, qui templum illud nobilissimum Dei Hierosolymitanum condidit.
因為從那被稱為第一位西爾維烏斯的埃涅阿斯之子起,到隨後的諸王,各人既有自己專屬的名字,也都不缺這個姓氏;正如許久以後那些繼承凱撒·奧古斯都的人被稱為凱撒一樣。但掃羅被棄絕,以致他的後裔無人得作王;他死後,在掃羅開始統治的四十年後,大衛繼位為王。那時雅典人在科德魯斯死後,便不再立王,而開始設立執政官來治理國政。大衛之後(他自己也作王四十年),他的兒子所羅門作以色列人的王,他建造了耶路撒冷那座極其著名的神的殿。
for from him who was called the first Silvius, the son of Aeneas, to the rest who followed, both their own proper names were bestowed and this surname was not lacking; just as long afterward those who succeeded Caesar Augustus were surnamed Caesars. But Saul being rejected, so that none of his stock should reign, and he being dead, David succeeded to the kingdom forty years after the beginning of Saul's rule. Then the Athenians, after the death of Codrus, ceased thereafter to have kings and began to have magistrates for administering the commonwealth. After David, who himself also reigned forty years, his son Solomon was king of the Israelites, who built that most renowned temple of God at Jerusalem.
19:71
Cuius tempore apud Latinos condita est Alba, ex qua deinceps non Latinorum, sed Albanorum reges appellari, in eodem tamen Latio, coeperunt. Salomoni successit filius eius Roboam, sub quo in duo regna populus ille diuisus est, et singulae partes suos singulos reges habere coeperunt. [XXI] Latium post Aenean, quem deum fecerunt, undecim reges habuit, quorum nullus deus factus est. Auentinus autem, qui duodecimo loco Aenean sequitur, cum esset prostratus in bello et sepultus in eo monte, qui etiam nunc eius nomine nuncupatur, deorum talium, quales sibi faciebant, numero est additus. Alii sane noluerunt eum in proelio scribere occisum, sed non conparuisse dixerunt;
在他的時代,拉丁人中建立了阿爾巴城,自此以後諸王便開始不被稱為拉丁人的王,而稱為阿爾巴人的王,儘管仍在同一個拉丁地區之內。所羅門由他的兒子羅波安繼位,在他治下那民族分裂為兩個王國,各部分開始各有自己的王。[二十一] 在埃涅阿斯(他們把他奉為神)之後,拉丁地區有十一位王,其中無一被奉為神。但阿文提努斯——他在埃涅阿斯之後排第十二位——在戰爭中被擊倒,葬於那座至今仍以他的名字命名的山上後,便被列入他們為自己所造的那類神明之列。然而另有些人不願記載他戰死沙場,卻說他失蹤了;
In his time Alba was founded among the Latins, from which thenceforth the kings began to be called not kings of the Latins but of the Albans, though still within the same Latium. To Solomon succeeded his son Rehoboam, under whom that people was divided into two kingdoms, and each part began to have its own several kings. [XXI] After Aeneas, whom they made a god, Latium had eleven kings, of whom none was made a god. But Aventinus, who follows Aeneas in the twelfth place, when he had been laid low in war and buried on that hill which even now is called by his name, was added to the number of such gods as they made for themselves. Yet others were unwilling to record that he was slain in battle, but said that he had disappeared;
19:72
nec ex eius uocabulo appellatum montem, sed ex aduentu auium dictum Auentinum. Post hunc non est deus factus in Latio nisi Romulus conditor Romae. Inter istum autem et illum reges reperiuntur duo, quorum primus est, ut eum Vergiliano uersu eloquar: Proximus ille Procas, Troianae gloria gentis. Cuius tempore quia iam quodam modo Roma parturiebatur, illud omnium regnorum maximum Assyrium finem tantae diuturnitatis accepit. Ad Medos quippe translatum est post annos ferme mille trecentos quinque, ut etiam Beli, qui Ninum genuit et illic paruo contentus imperio primus rex fuit, tempora computentur. Procas autem regnauit ante Amulium.
又說那山並非由他的名字得名,而是因鳥(aves)飛來而稱為阿文提努斯。在他之後,拉丁地區除了羅馬的建立者羅慕路斯外,再無人被奉為神。但在此人與彼人之間,發現有兩位王,其中第一位——用維吉爾的詩句來說——就是「其次是那位普羅卡斯,特洛伊民族的榮耀」。在他的時代,因為羅馬此時已在某種意義上孕育待生,那最偉大的王國,即亞述王國,也就結束了如此長久的存續。因為若連別路斯的年代也計算在內(他生了尼努斯,並在那裡以微小的統治為足,作了第一位王),亞述王國在將近一千三百零五年後便轉移到瑪代人手中。而普羅卡斯是在阿穆利烏斯之前作王的。
and that the hill was named not from his name, but called Aventine from the coming of the birds (aves). After him no god was made in Latium except Romulus the founder of Rome. But between this one and that one two kings are found, of whom the first is—to speak of him in Virgil's verse—'Next comes that Procas, the glory of the Trojan race.' In his time, because Rome was now in a manner being brought to birth, that greatest of all kingdoms, the Assyrian, received the end of so great a duration. For it was transferred to the Medes after nearly one thousand three hundred and five years, if we reckon also the times of Belus, who begot Ninus and was there the first king, content with a small dominion. But Procas reigned before Amulius.
19:73
Porro Amulius fratris sui Numitoris filiam Rheam nomine, quae etiam Ilia uocabatur, Romuli matrem, Vestalem uirginem fecerat, quam uolunt de Marte geminos concepisse, isto modo stuprum eius honorantes uel excusantes, et adhibentes argumentum, quod infantes expositos lupa nutriuerit. Hoc enim genus bestiae ad Martem existimant pertinere, ut uidelicet ideo lupa credatur admouisse ubera paruulis, quia filios domini sui Martis agnouit;
阿穆利烏斯曾立他弟兄努米托爾的女兒、名叫雷婭(又稱伊利亞)、羅慕路斯的母親為維斯塔貞女。他們硬要說她是由戰神瑪爾斯懷了雙胞胎,藉此為她的失貞增光或開脫,並舉出證據說有一隻母狼哺育了那被丟棄的嬰孩。因為他們認為這種野獸屬於瑪爾斯,於是母狼被認為向那兩個小兒送上乳頭,是因為牠認出了牠主人瑪爾斯的兒子;
Now Amulius had made Rhea by name—also called Ilia—the daughter of his brother Numitor and the mother of Romulus, a Vestal virgin. They will have it that she conceived twins by Mars, in this way honoring or excusing her defilement, and adducing as proof that a she-wolf suckled the exposed infants. For they suppose this kind of beast to pertain to Mars, so that, forsooth, the she-wolf is believed to have offered her teats to the little ones because she recognized the sons of her lord Mars;
19:74
quamuis non desint qui dicant, cum expositi uagientes iacerent, a nescio qua primum meretrice fuisse collectos et primas eius suxisse mamillas (meretrices autem lupas uocabant, unde etiam nunc turpia loca earum lupanaria nuncupantur), et eos postea ad Faustulum peruenisse pastorem atque ab eius Acca uxore nutritos. Quamquam si ad arguendum hominem regem, qui eos in aquam proici crudeliter iusserat, eis infantibus, per quos tanta ciuitas condenda fuerat, de aqua diuinitus liberatis per lactantem feram Deus uoluit subuenire, quid mirum est? Amulio successit in regnum Latiare frater eius Numitor, auus Romuli, cuius Numitoris primo anno condita est Roma;
雖然也有人說,那被丟棄的嬰孩躺著哭號時,是先被某個妓女拾起,先吮吸了她的乳房(人們把妓女稱為母狼lupae,所以至今她們那些下流的場所仍稱為lupanaria妓院),後來才落到牧人法烏斯圖盧斯手中,由他的妻子阿卡撫養。然而,若神為了斥責一個人——一個曾殘忍下令把他們投入水中的王——而願意藉一頭正在哺乳的野獸,把這些從水中蒙神救出的嬰孩(那將要建立如此偉大城邦的嬰孩)加以救助,這又有何可奇呢?阿穆利烏斯由他的弟兄努米托爾——羅慕路斯的外祖父——繼承拉丁王位;在這努米托爾在位的第一年,羅馬便建立了;
although there are those who say that, when the exposed infants lay wailing, they were first gathered up by some harlot and sucked her breasts first (for they used to call harlots she-wolves—lupae—whence even now their shameful places are called lupanaria, brothels), and that afterward they came to the shepherd Faustulus and were reared by his wife Acca. Yet if, to convict a man—a king—who had cruelly ordered them to be cast into the water, God willed to succor those infants (through whom so great a city was to be founded), when they had been divinely delivered from the water by means of a suckling beast, what wonder is there? To Amulius succeeded in the Latin kingdom his brother Numitor, the grandfather of Romulus; and in the first year of this Numitor Rome was founded;
19:75
ac per hoc cum suo deinceps, id est Romulo, nepote regnauit. [XXII] Ne multis morer, condita est ciuitas Roma uelut altera Babylon et uelut prioris filia Babylonis, per quam Deo placuit orbem debellare terrarum et in unam societatem rei publicae legumque perductum longe lateque pacare. Erant enim iam populi ualidi et fortes et armis gentes exercitatae, quae non facile cederent, et quas opus esset ingentibus periculis et uastatione utrimque non parua atque horrendo labore superari.
於是他自此便與他的外孫,即羅慕路斯,一同作王。[二十二] 不必多加拖延,羅馬城之建立,宛如第二個巴比倫,又彷彿前一個巴比倫的女兒;神藉著它樂意征服全地,把世界納入一個政體與法律的團契之中,並使其遠近皆得太平。因為那時已有強盛勇猛的民族、精於武藝的列邦,他們不會輕易屈服,必須以巨大的危險、雙方不小的破壞和可怕的勞苦才能制伏。
and thus he reigned thenceforth together with his grandson, that is, Romulus. [XXII] Not to delay long, the city of Rome was founded as a kind of second Babylon and, as it were, the daughter of the former Babylon, through which it pleased God to subdue the whole world and, having brought it into one fellowship of commonwealth and laws, to pacify it far and wide. For there were now peoples strong and mighty, nations trained in arms, who would not easily yield, and who had to be overcome with immense perils and no small devastation on both sides and dreadful toil.
19:76
Nam quando regnum Assyriorum totam paene Asiam subiugauit, licet bellando sit factum, non tamen multum asperis et difficilibus bellis fieri potuit, quia rudes adhuc ad resistendum gentes erant nec tam multae uel magnae, si quidem post illud maximum atque uniuersale diluuium, cum in arca Noe octo soli homines euaserunt, anni non multo amplius quam mille transierant, quando Ninus Asiam totam excepta India subiugauit. Roma uero tot gentes et Orientis et Occidentis, quas imperio Romano subditas cernimus, non ea celeritate ac facilitate perdomuit, quoniam paulatim increscendo robustas eas et bellicosas, quaqua uersum dilatabatur, inuenit.
因為當亞述王國征服幾乎整個亞細亞時,雖是靠戰爭達成,卻無需極為艱難的惡戰,因為那些列邦當時尚不諳抵抗,數目也不多、勢力也不大——要知道,在那最大而普世的洪水之後(那時只有八個人在挪亞的方舟中得救),到尼努斯征服除印度外整個亞細亞,過去的年數也不過一千多年而已。但羅馬制伏我們所見臣服於羅馬帝國的東西方眾多民族,卻沒有那樣的迅速與輕易,因為它是逐漸壯大的,凡其擴展所及之處,都遇見這些民族已是強健而好戰的了。
For when the kingdom of the Assyrians subjugated almost all Asia, although it was accomplished by warfare, yet it could not be done by very harsh and difficult wars, because the nations were as yet untrained to resist, nor so many or so great, seeing that after that greatest and universal flood, when only eight men escaped in Noah's ark, not much more than a thousand years had passed when Ninus subjugated all Asia except India. But Rome did not subdue with such speed and ease so many nations, both of the East and of the West, which we behold made subject to the Roman empire, since, growing gradually, it found them, whithersoever it spread, robust and warlike.
19:77
Tempore igitur, quo Roma condita est, populus Israel habebat in terra promissionis annos septingentos decem et octo. Ex quibus uiginti septem pertinent ad Iesum Naue, deinde ad tempus iudicum trecenti uiginti nouem. Ex quo autem reges ibi esse coeperant, anni erant trecenti sexaginta duo. Et rex tunc erat in Iuda, cuius nomen erat Achaz uel, sicut alii conputant, qui ei successit Ezechias, quem quidem constat optimum et piissimum regem Romuli regnasse temporibus. In ea uero Hebraei populi parte, quae appellabatur Israel, regnare coeperat Osee. [XXIII] Eodem tempore nonnulli Sibyllam Erythraeam uaticinatam ferunt. Sibyllas autem Varro prodit plures fuisse, non unam.
因此,在羅馬建立之時,以色列民在應許之地已有七百一十八年。其中二十七年屬於嫩的兒子約書亞,其後三百二十九年屬於士師時代。而從那裡開始有王算起,則有三百六十二年。那時猶大有一位王,名叫亞哈斯——或如另一些人所計算的,是繼承他的希西家,人所公認他在羅慕路斯的時代作王,是位極其優良而虔敬的王。而在那被稱為以色列的希伯來民那一部分中,何細亞已開始作王。[二十三] 據傳同一時期,厄立特里亞的西比拉發了預言。不過瓦羅記載說,西比拉有好幾位,並非只有一位。
At the time, therefore, when Rome was founded, the people of Israel had been in the land of promise seven hundred and eighteen years. Of these, twenty-seven pertain to Joshua the son of Nun, then three hundred and twenty-nine to the time of the judges. And from the time when kings began to be there, the years were three hundred and sixty-two. And there was then king in Judah, whose name was Ahaz—or, as others reckon, Hezekiah who succeeded him, who indeed is agreed to have reigned in the times of Romulus as a most excellent and most pious king. But in that part of the Hebrew people which was called Israel, Hoshea had begun to reign. [XXIII] At the same time some report that the Erythraean Sibyl prophesied. But Varro records that there were several Sibyls, not one.
19:78
Haec sane Erythraea Sibylla quaedam de Christo manifesta conscripsit; quod et.iam nos prius in Latina lingua uersibus male Latinis et non stantibus legimus per nescio cuius interpretis imperitiam, sicut post cognouimus. Nam uir clarissimus Flaccianus, qui etiam proconsul fuit, homo facillimae facundiae multaeque doctrinae, cum de Christo conloqueremur, Graecum nobis codicem protulit, carmina esse dicens Sibyllae Erythraeae, ubi ostendit quodam loco in capitibus uersuum ordinem litterarum ita se habentem, ut haec in eo uerba legerentur: Iesous Chreistos Theou vios soter , quod est Latine, Iesus Christus Dei filius saluator.
這位厄立特里亞的西比拉確實寫下了一些關於基督的明白之事;我們從前也曾以拉丁文讀過這些,是拉丁文拙劣、音步不合的詩句,出於某位不知名譯者的粗淺技藝,這是我們後來才得知的。因為那位極為傑出的人弗拉奇亞努斯——他也曾任行省總督,是位口才極其流暢、學識淵博的人——當我們談論基督時,拿出一部希臘文抄本給我們看,說那是厄立特里亞西比拉的詩篇,他在某處指出各行詩句首字母排列的次序,使人在其中讀出這些字:「Iesous Chreistos Theou Yios Soter」,用拉丁文說就是「耶穌基督,神的兒子,救主」。
This Erythraean Sibyl certainly wrote down certain manifest things concerning Christ; which we too formerly read in the Latin tongue in verses that were poor Latin and did not scan, through the unskillfulness of some translator or other, as we afterward learned. For that most distinguished man Flaccianus, who was also proconsul, a man of most ready eloquence and much learning, when we were conversing about Christ, brought out to us a Greek codex, saying that they were the verses of the Erythraean Sibyl, where he showed that in a certain passage the initial letters of the verses had this order of letters, so that these words might be read therein: 'Iesous Chreistos Theou Yios Soter,' which is in Latin 'Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior.'
← 上一段下一段 →
← 第 18 章第 20 章 →
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。