📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 文集(天主之城·論三位一體等)

文集(天主之城·論三位一體等) 第 8 章 第 4/4 段

拉丁文原文.10 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 8:119–8:128(全章共 128 節)

← 第 7 章第 9 章 →
← 上一段
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
8:119
[XXXIV] Sed contra inuenimus, sicut ipse uir doctissimus prodidit, de Numae Pompilii libris redditas sacrorum causas nullo modo potuisse tolerari nec dignas habitas, quae non solum lectae innotescerent religiosis, sed saltem scriptae reconderentur in tenebris. Iam enim dicam, quod in tertio huius operis libro me suo loco dicturum esse promiseram. Nam, sicut apud eundem Varronem legitur in libro de cultu deorum, "Terentius quidam cum haberet ad Ianiculum fundum et bubulcus eius iuxta sepulcrum Numae Pompilii traiciens aratrum eruisset ex terra libros eius, ubi sacrorum institutorum scriptae erant causae, in Vrbem pertulit ad praetorem.
然而,正相反,我們卻看見(正如那位極博學之人自己所述):從努瑪·龐皮利烏斯(Numa Pompilius)的書卷中引出的那些聖禮之緣由,非但絕不能被容忍,也被認為不配讓虔敬之人不僅讀到、還藉此得知,而是應當——既已寫下——就藏匿於黑暗之中。因為如今我要說出那在本著作第三卷中我曾應許要在適當處說的話。因為,正如在同一位瓦羅《論敬拜諸神》一書中所讀到的:「有一位泰倫提烏斯(Terentius),在雅尼庫盧姆(Janiculum)擁有一塊田產,他的耕夫在努瑪·龐皮利烏斯的墳墓旁趕犁時,從地裡掘出了努瑪的書卷——其中寫著那些聖禮制度的緣由——便把它們帶進城,交給了裁判官。」
But on the contrary we find, as that most learned man himself has related, that the causes of the sacred rites rendered from the books of Numa Pompilius could in no way be tolerated, nor were they deemed worthy that, being not only read, they should become known to the religious, but that, having at least been written, they should be hidden away in darkness. For now I shall say what in the third book of this work I had promised I would say in its proper place. For, as one reads in the same Varro in the book On the Worship of the Gods, 'A certain Terentius, having an estate at the Janiculum, and his plowman, driving the plow near the tomb of Numa Pompilius, having dug up out of the earth his books in which were written the causes of the sacred institutions, carried them into the City to the praetor.'
8:120
At ille cum inspexisset principia, rem tantam detulit ad senatum. Vbi cum primores quasdam causas legissent, cur quidque in sacris fuerit institutum, Numae mortuo senatus adsensus est, eosque libros tamquam religiosi patres conscripti, praetor ut combureret, censuerunt." Credat quisque quod putat; immo uero dicat, quod dicendum suggesserit uesana contentio, quilibet tantae impietatis defensor egregius.
「但他一查看那些開頭的部分,便把這樁如此重大之事呈到元老院。在那裡,當首要之人讀了其中某些緣由——即何以在聖禮中設立各樣事物——之後,元老院便附和了已死的努瑪,並且像敬虔的元老們一般,議決要裁判官把那些書卷焚燒。」讓各人隨自己所想的去相信吧;不,倒不如讓任何一位為如此大不虔辯護的卓越辯士,去說那瘋狂的爭辯所慫恿他該說的話罷。
'But he, when he had inspected the opening portions, brought so great a matter before the senate. There, when the leading men had read certain of the causes why each thing had been instituted in the sacred rites, the senate assented to the dead Numa, and, like religious conscript fathers, decreed that the praetor should burn those books.' Let each believe what he thinks; nay rather, let any distinguished defender of so great an impiety say what raving contentiousness has suggested ought to be said.
8:121
Me admonere sufficiat sacrorum causas a rege Pompilio Romanorum sacrorum institutore conscriptas nec populo nec senatui nec saltem ipsis sacerdotibus innotescere debuisse ipsumque Numam Pompilium curiositate inlicita ad ea daemonum peruenisse secreta, quae ipse quidem scriberet, ut haberet unde legendo commoneretur; sed ea tamen, cum rex esset, qui minime quemquam metueret, nec docere aliquem nec delendo uel quoquo modo consumendo perdere auderet. Ita quod scire neminem uoluit, ne homines nefaria doceret, uiolare autem timuit, ne daemones iratos haberet, obruit, ubi tutum putauit, sepulcro suo propinquare aratrum posse non credens.
我只需指出這一點便足夠了:羅馬聖禮的創立者——龐皮利烏斯王——所記錄下來的那些聖禮之緣由,本不該讓百姓、元老院,甚至連祭司們自己都知曉;而努瑪·龐皮利烏斯本人乃是憑著不法的好奇心,才觸及了那些邪魔的祕密。他確實把這些記錄下來,好使自己藉著誦讀而得以提醒。然而,身為一位毫不畏懼任何人的君王,他既不敢將這些教導任何人,也不敢用抹除或以任何方式銷毀的辦法將其廢棄。於是,他既不願讓任何人知曉——免得將邪惡之事教予世人——卻又懼怕去毀壞它——免得觸怒邪魔——便把它埋藏在他認為安全之處,並不相信犁鏵竟能靠近他的墳墓。
Let it suffice for me to point out that the reasons for the sacred rites, set down in writing by King Pompilius, the founder of the Romans' rites, ought not to have been made known either to the people, or to the senate, or even to the priests themselves; and that Numa Pompilius himself, by an unlawful curiosity, arrived at those secrets of the demons which he indeed wrote down, so that he might have a source from which, by reading, he could be reminded. Yet, being king, one who feared no man at all, he dared neither to teach these things to anyone, nor to destroy them by erasing or by consuming them in any way whatever. Thus, what he willed that no one should know, lest he teach men wicked things, and yet feared to violate, lest he render the demons angry, he buried in the place he thought safe, not believing that the plough could ever come near his tomb.
8:122
Senatus autem cum religiones formidaret damnare maiorum et ideo Numae adsentiri cogeretur, illos tamen libros tam perniciosos esse iudicauit, ut nec obrui rursus iuberet, ne humana curiositas multo uehementius rem iam proditam quaereret, sed flammis aboleri nefanda monumenta, ut, quia iam necesse esse existimabant sacra illa facere, tolerabilius erraretur causis eorum ignoratis, quam cognitis ciuitas turbaretur. [XXXV] Nam et ipse Numa, ad quem nullus Dei propheta, nullus sanctus angelus mittebatur, hydromantian facere compulsus est, ut in aqua uideret imagines deorum uel potius ludificationes daemonum, aquibus audiret, quid in sacris constituere atque obseruare deberet.
但元老院既畏懼定罪祖先的宗教,因而不得不順從努瑪,卻仍判定那些書籍極為有害,以致不下令重新埋藏它們——免得人的好奇心對這已被洩露之事更加猛烈地探究——反而下令用火焚燒那些可憎的記錄;如此,既然他們如今認為施行那些聖禮已屬必要,那麼在不知其緣由的情況下犯錯,比起知曉之後使國家陷入動亂,倒更可容忍。〔第三十五章〕因為努瑪本人——無先知從神那裡奉差來到他這裡,也無聖天使奉差——竟被驅使去行水占之術,好在水中看見諸神的形像,或不如說是邪魔的戲弄,從而聽取自己在聖禮中當設立並遵守之事。
But the senate, since it dreaded to condemn the religion of its forefathers and was therefore compelled to assent to Numa, nevertheless judged those books to be so pernicious that it did not order them buried again — lest human curiosity should seek all the more vehemently a matter now betrayed — but ordered that these abominable records be destroyed by fire; so that, since they now deemed it necessary to perform those rites, it was more tolerable to err with the reasons for them unknown, than for the state to be thrown into turmoil once they were known. [XXXV] For Numa himself, to whom no prophet of God, no holy angel, was sent, was driven to practise hydromancy, so as to see in water the images of the gods — or rather the mockeries of demons — from whom he might hear what he ought to establish and observe in the sacred rites.
8:123
Quod genus diuinationis idem Varro a Persis dicit allatum, quo et ipsum Numam et postea Pythagoram philosophum usum fuisse commemorat; ubi adhibito sanguine etiam inferos perhibet sciscitari et *nekuomantei/an Graece dicit uocari, quae [siue hydromantia] siue necromantia dicatur, id ipsum est, ubi uidentur mortui diuinare. Quibus haec artibus fiant, ipsi uiderint. Nolo enim dicere has artes etiam ante nostri Saluatoris aduentum in ipsis ciuitatibus gentium legibus solere prohiberi et poena seuerissima uindicari. Nolo, inquam, hoc dicere; fortassis enim talia tunc licebant.
這同一位瓦羅說,這種占卜術是從波斯人那裡傳來的,他還記載努瑪本人以及後來的哲學家畢達哥拉斯都曾使用過它;他斷言,在使用血的情況下,甚至可以向陰間的死者詢問,並說這在希臘文中稱為「nekyomanteia」(招魂術)。無論稱之為水占還是招魂術,其實是同一回事,即死者彷彿在其中作預言。這些事究竟藉何種法術成就,就讓行此術的人自己去承擔吧。因為我並不願意說:這些法術甚至在我們救主降臨以前,就慣常被列邦城邦自身的律法所禁止,並受最嚴厲的刑罰懲治。我說,我不願斷言此事;因為或許那時這類事情是被容許的。
This kind of divination the same Varro says was brought from the Persians, and he records that both Numa himself and afterwards the philosopher Pythagoras made use of it; where, with blood employed, he asserts that even the dead below are consulted, and he says it is called in Greek 'nekyomanteia.' Whether it be termed hydromancy or necromancy, it is the very same thing, wherein the dead seem to divine. By what arts these things are done, let those responsible look to it. For I do not wish to say that these arts, even before the coming of our Saviour, were wont to be forbidden by the laws of the cities of the nations themselves and punished with the severest penalty. I do not wish, I say, to affirm this; for perhaps such things were then permitted.
8:124
His tamen artibus didicit sacra illa Pompilius, quorum sacrorum facta prodidit, causas obruit (ita timuit et ipse quod didicit), quarum causarum proditos libros senatus incendit. Quid mihi ergo Varro illorum sacrorum alias nescio quas causas uelut physicas interpretatur? quales si libri illi habuissent, non utique arsissent, aut et istos Varronis ad Caesarem pontificem scriptos atque editos patres conscripti similiter incendissent. Quod ergo aquam egesserit, id est exportauerit, Numa Pompilius, unde hydromantian faceret, ideo nympham Egeriam coniugem dicitur habuisse, quem ad modum in supradicto libro Varronis exponitur. Ita enim solent res gestae aspersione mendaciorum in fabulas uerti.
然而龐皮利烏斯正是藉這些法術學得了那些聖禮;他公開了聖禮的儀式,卻埋藏了其緣由(可見他自己也懼怕所學之事),而元老院焚燒了洩露那些緣由的書籍。那麼瓦羅為何要向我提出關於那些聖禮的另一些我所不知的、彷彿屬於自然學的緣由呢?倘若那些書籍中真含有此類緣由,它們絕不會被焚燒;否則元老院諸位長老也早會同樣焚燒瓦羅這些寫給並獻給大祭司凱撒的著作了。如今,正因努瑪·龐皮利烏斯汲取了——即引出了——水,以此施行水占,人們才說他娶了女神埃格里亞為妻,正如上述瓦羅那卷書中所述。因為真實的事蹟,往往就這樣藉著謊言的點染而轉變為神話。
Yet it was by these arts that Pompilius learned those sacred rites, whose ceremonies he made public but whose reasons he buried (so did he too fear what he had learned); and the senate burned the books that betrayed those reasons. Why then does Varro offer me some other reasons for those rites — I know not what — as though they were physical? For if those books had contained such reasons, they surely would not have been burned; or else the conscript fathers would likewise have burned these of Varro's, written and published to Caesar the pontiff. Now, because Numa Pompilius drew off water — that is, carried it out — from which to perform hydromancy, he is therefore said to have had the nymph Egeria as his wife, as is set forth in the aforesaid book of Varro. For so are actual deeds wont, by a sprinkling of falsehoods, to be turned into fables.
8:125
In illa igitur hydromantia curiosissimus rex ille Romanus et sacra didicit, quae in libris suis pontifices haberent, et eorum causas, quas praeter se neminem scire uoluit. Itaque eas seorsum scriptas secum quodam modo mori fecit, quando ita subtrahendas hominum notitiae sepeliendasque curauit. Aut ergo daemonum illic tam sordidae et noxiae cupiditates erant conscriptae, ut ex his tota illa theologia ciuilis etiam apud tales homines execrabilis appareret, qui tam multa in ipsis sacris erubescenda susceperant;
由此可見,在那水占之中,那位極其好奇的羅馬王既學得了祭司們當保存於書中的聖禮,又學得了其緣由——他不願除自己以外任何人知曉這些緣由。於是他把這些緣由另行寫下,可說使之隨他一同死去,因為他設法使之如此從世人的認知中撤去並埋藏起來。因此,要麼是那裡所記錄的邪魔之慾望是如此污穢有害,以致從中可見那整個國家宗教(civil theology)即便在那樣的人眼中也顯為可憎——這些人在那些聖禮中本已接受了那麼多令人羞愧之事;
In that hydromancy, then, that most inquisitive Roman king both learned the sacred rites which the pontiffs were to keep in their books, and their reasons, which he willed that no one but himself should know. And so he caused these, written separately, in a manner to die with him, since he took care that they be thus withdrawn from men's knowledge and buried. Either, therefore, the desires of the demons written there were so filthy and noxious that from them the whole of that civil theology would appear execrable even among such men — men who had taken upon themselves so many shameful things in those very rites;
8:126
aut illi omnes nihil aliud quam homines mortui prodebantur, quos tam prolixa temporis uetustate fere omnes populi gentium deos inmortales esse crediderant, cum et talibus sacris idem illi daemones oblectarentur, qui se colendos pro ipsis mortuis, quos deos putari fecerant, quibusdam fallacium miraculorum adtestationibus supponebant. Sed occulta Dei ueri prouidentia factum est, ut et Pompilio amico suo illis conciliati artibus, quibus hydromantia fieri potuit, cuncta illa confiteri permitterentur, et tamen, ut moriturus incenderet ea potius quam obrueret, admonere non permitterentur;
要麼是所有那些被當作神的,都被揭穿無非是已死的凡人罷了——由於年代如此久遠,列邦幾乎所有的民族都曾相信他們是不朽的神明;與此同時,那些同樣的邪魔卻以這樣的聖禮為樂,這些邪魔藉著某些虛假神蹟的見證,暗中頂替,使自己得以取代那些被他們造作為神的死者而受敬拜。然而,藉著真神隱祕的護理,事情竟成了這樣:那些邪魔一方面被容許向牠們的朋友龐皮利烏斯——他已藉那能施行水占的法術與牠們結交——供認一切這些事,另一方面卻不被容許去勸他,在臨死之際寧可焚燒它們,而非埋藏它們;
or else all those beings were betrayed to be nothing other than dead men, whom, through so long an antiquity of time, almost all the peoples of the nations had believed to be immortal gods — while those same demons took delight in such rites, demons who, by certain attestations of deceptive miracles, substituted themselves to be worshipped in place of those very dead whom they had caused to be reckoned gods. But by the hidden providence of the true God it came to pass that they were both permitted to confess all these things to Pompilius, their friend, having been won over by those arts through which hydromancy could be performed, and yet were not permitted to advise him that, being about to die, he should rather burn them than bury them;
8:127
qui ne innotescerent nec aratro, quo sunt eruta, obsistere potuerunt, nec stilo Varronis, quo ea, quae de hac re gesta sunt, in nostram memoriam peruenerunt. Non enim possunt, quod non sinuntur efficere; sinuntur autem alto Dei summi iustoque iudicio pro meritis eorum, quos ab eis uel adfligi tantum, uel etiam subici ac decipi iustum est. Quam uero perniciosae uel a cultu uerae diuinitatis alienae illae litterae iudicatae sint, hinc intellegi potest, quod eas maluit senatus incendere, quas Pompilius occultauit, quam timere quod timuit, qui hoc audere non potuit. Qui ergo uitam nec modo habere uult piam, talibus sacris quaerat aeternam;
為了不讓這些事顯露出來,那些邪魔既無力抵擋那將它們掘出的犁鏵,也無力抵擋瓦羅的筆——藉著這筆,這件事的經過得以流傳到我們的記憶中。因為凡不蒙允准的,牠們便不能施行;而牠們之所以蒙允准,乃是出於至高之神深邃而公義的審判,按著那些人所應得的——這些人被牠們或僅僅苦待,或甚至被制伏、被欺騙,都是公義的。至於那些著作被判定為何等有害、何等悖離對真神的敬拜,從此便可看出:元老院寧願焚燒龐皮利烏斯所隱藏之物,也不願去畏懼他所畏懼的——他連做此事都不敢。那麼,凡連如今都不願度虔敬生活的人,就讓他藉這樣的聖禮去尋求永生吧;
so that they might not become known, they had no power to resist either the plough by which they were dug up, or the pen of Varro by which the things done in this matter have come down to our memory. For they cannot do what they are not permitted; and they are permitted, by the deep and just judgment of the most high God, according to the deserts of those whom it is just should be either merely afflicted by them, or even subjected to and deceived by them. And how pernicious those writings were judged to be, and how alien from the worship of true divinity, may be understood from this: that the senate preferred to burn what Pompilius had hidden, rather than to fear what he feared — he who could not dare to do this. Let him, then, who is unwilling to have a pious life even now, seek eternal life through such rites;
8:128
qui autem cum malignis daemonibus non uult habere societatem, non superstitionem, qua coluntur, noxiam pertimescat, sed ueram religionem, qua produntur et uincuntur, agnoscat.
但凡不願與惡邪魔相交的人,就讓他不要畏懼那藉以敬拜牠們的有害迷信,反倒去認識那藉以揭露並戰勝牠們的真宗教吧。
but let him who does not wish to have fellowship with the malignant demons not dread the noxious superstition by which they are worshipped, but rather acknowledge the true religion by which they are exposed and overcome.
← 上一段
← 第 7 章第 9 章 →
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。