CHAPTER ONE. A particular reasoning concerning the world, and a natural disputation and clearer exposition of those things which were earlier shown to be agreed upon in the formation of man. This is the book, says the Scripture, of the generation of heaven and earth, when all the things that are seen were perfected, and each thing, distinguished, withdrew to its proper place; when this revolving body of heaven established all things, while the heavy bodies, those that incline downward, obtained the middle place of the whole creation—namely earth and water, mutually containing each other. But a certain bond and support of the things that were made is the divine and eternal power, inserted into the natures of existing things, which governs the universe by twin effects.
For in rest and in motion it has contrived not only generation from things that do not stand, but permanence for things that subsist, around the most weighty and unchangeable immobility of nature, as it were a certain stable and most firm axis, continually carrying around the most swift circulation of heaven after the manner of a wheel, and preserving the indissoluble substance through each by means of both. For the revolving matter, by its most rapid motion, wheeling around the solidity of the earth, draws it tight, and the stability of the earth, by its immovable firmness, is unceasingly extended through the circuit of the revolving things:
and an equal magnitude is fitted together according to each of those things whose operation differs, that is, both of that which is of stable nature and of that which is snatched along in unceasing rotation; for neither can the earth be transferred from its proper solidity, nor can heaven ever be slackened in the most swift revolution of its motion. And these things are proved to have been constructed first, according to the wisdom of the Creator, as it were a certain beginning of the whole fabric—as that magnificent Moses declares by this, that he commemorates the heaven and the earth to have been made by God in the beginning, and that out of the motion and the rest which are seen in this creation, according to the divine counsel, all things in generation were brought forth.
Since therefore heaven and earth are separated from one another by equal measures according to a contrary efficacy, that creature which is in the midst of the contraries, partaking in a certain part of the things that cohere with it, connects the divided extremities by its own mediation. So that the conjunctions of the contraries to one another are made manifest by this interposition. For the air imitates in some degree the substance of the ever-moving and most subtle fire, both by the lightness of its nature and by the readiness of its motion: yet it is not of such a kind that it should appear alien from the kinship of the most solid things, neither remaining ever immovable, nor continually flowing away and failing:
but by the property of each it is made, as it were, neighbour to certain effects of the contraries, at once mingling and dividing within itself the things that are by nature distinct; and according to this same reckoning it is fitted together with both contrarieties, being supported also by a twofold affection toward the liquid substance. For inasmuch as it is heavy and inclined downward, it is bound by much kinship to the earthly nature; but inasmuch as it is of fluid and flowing efficacy, it is in no way known to be devoid of a movable nature:
for by this very thing there comes to be a certain mixture and concourse of opposites, while heaviness passes over into motion, nor again is motion retarded by heaviness, but they come together to one another, things that are by nature divided at their extremities, while they are mutually coupled by a certain mediation—or rather, by a most careful design not even the very substance of the contraries exists without an intermixture of the other's property. Likewise, as I judge, all the things that are discerned in the world consent to one another in mutual fellowship, and all creation is known to conspire into one, while it is found in the properties of opposites. For since motion comes about not only according to local translation, but also according to a turning and changeable manner:
and likewise the stable nature in no way admits the motion which comes about through change: the wisdom of God, permuting the properties of each, made the immovable nature indeed convertible, but the movable nature inconvertible—dispensing these things thus by a certain providence, lest that which is singular or proper to the divine nature (that is, immobility and unchangeableness), being beheld in some creature, should cause one to esteem the creature to be God. For the soul will not be able to be seen to hold the opinion of Divinity concerning that which is movable or mutable. For this reason the earth indeed is stable, but mutable; whereas heaven, on the contrary, since it is not mutable, is at the same time not stable:
so that the divine power, by attaching mutability to the stable substance and mobility to the unchangeable, and coupling each to the other through the contrariety of both by their own properties, might remove from the opinion of Divinity that which is neither of these (as has been said) of the divine nature, namely that which is proved to be mutable and unstable. All things, therefore, have been fittingly adapted to their own end. For they are perfect, as Moses says: the heaven and the earth and those things that are midway between them, all of wondrous beauty, each thing suitably adorned: the heaven indeed glittering with the lights of the stars; the sea and the air wondrously exulting with living things, both those that swim and those that fly;
but the earth, exulting in a certain way with the manifold natures of herbs and the diversities of shrubs, which, quickened by the divine power that preserves all things, brought forth; and indeed it was filled with all kinds of species, producing fruits together with flowers, full and prepared for those things that are wont to arise in them: all the ridges too of the mountains and the summits, and whatever is convex and upturned, or level and outspread in the valleys, were crowned with the new species of herbs and the varied beauty of trees—at one moment, as it were, eminences rising out of the earth, but soon rejoicing in the comeliness that hastens to their perfection, all things quickened according to their own measure by the divine command.
The beasts of burden indeed, herd by herd according to their own kind, lingered as they ran about in the wood; and with the modulated songs of the birds all the woods resounded in harmony. The face of the sea also (as one may esteem) was then established in its deepest gatherings with the greatest placidity and tranquillity. Beside it, stations and harbours, made as it were certain bays by the divine will, joined the seas to the lands along the shores; and the most quiet motions of the waves were rippled like green meadows, ruffling the surface of their upper face with fitting subtlety by the slightest and harmless breezes; and the whole globe, according to its creation, stood prepared by land and sea. But meanwhile there was none who might make use of these things. CHAPTER TWO.
Why man was made last after the creation. For not yet was that great and precious thing, man, the lord of the world, present; nor indeed had it been fitting that the prince should exist before those things over which he would exercise his princely rule. But when all things had been prepared to be subjected to him, it was now consequent that the ruler should appear. Since therefore the Creator of the universe had made, as it were, a certain royal dwelling for the future king—and this was the earth, islands, seas, and above these the heaven curved in the manner of a vault—and had stored up the manifold riches of the kingdom;
and by riches I mean the whole creation—whatever is in herbs and plants and trees, whatever is in things spiritual and sensible and animate; to which riches it is fitting that even the metals too be numbered, which on account of the beauty of their colours have seemed precious to human eyes, such as gold and silver and those stones that men love—hiding away the abundance of all these, as in certain royal treasuries, within the bounds of the earth, He straightway introduced man into this world, that he might be a spectator of certain wonders, but of certain others might hold the dominion as ruler;
so that through the things he would use he might understand the Bestower, and through the things he contemplates as beautiful and magnificent he might be able to investigate the ineffable power of his Maker. For this reason man was introduced last into this world after the creation: not as the most vile, cast off in the extremest part, but as one whom it befitted to be straightway begotten as ruler. For just as a certain excellent host does not introduce the diner into the house before he has prepared the feast, but, setting in order all the furnishings and fittingly adorning the house—the couches too, and the table, and the rest—then invites the summoned guest to the delights now made ready:
after this manner the rich and abundant Creator and Nurturer of our substance, filling the dwelling of this world with all good things and arranging these great and varied feasts, thus introduced man, giving him as an excellent task to keep a commandment, so that he might rejoice not in the appetite of things that do not exist, but in the possession of things present. Therefore He also wove for him the causes of a twofold composition, mingling the spiritual with the earthly, so that through the kinship of both he might possess each property—enjoying God spiritually indeed, but receiving earthly goods by bodily use. CHAPTER THREE. That the human condition is more precious than every creature that is seen.
But it is worthy that this matter too should not pass by uncontemplated: that the construction of this so great world, and the universality of its parts by which it is contained in the elements, is brought to perfection by the divine power on the instant, subsisting together with the command; whereas the formation of man was preceded by the counsel of so great an Artificer, and by the description of the word it is signified beforehand what is to be—what manner of thing it ought to be, and the similitude of what first form it should bear, for what cause it should come to be, and what, when finished, it should effect, and over what things it should hold dominion. All these were first perceived in action, so that before his generation man might in a certain way obtain a more ancient dignity, possessing the principate of all things before he subsisted. For God said:
Let us make man to our image and likeness, and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and over the beasts of the earth, and over the birds of heaven, and over the cattle of the whole earth. O what a marvel! the sun comes to be, and no counsel precedes it; the heaven also, to which nothing in the visible creatures is found similar, is perfected by a word alone, and so wondrous a work—neither whence it should be made nor in what manner—is intimated: so too each single one of the creatures, the ether, the stars, and the air which holds the middle place, the sea, the earth, the animals and all things that are born, are produced by a word only, that they may be;
but to the making of man alone the Creator of the universe approaches, as it were, with counsel, and prepares the matter that is necessary for his construction, and fits the likeness of him to the form of the primal and principal beauty, and intimates the intention, for the sake of what thing he should come to be, establishing for him a nature congruous to its effects, which is proved to be most apt for the purpose. CHAPTER FOUR. Why in all respects the very construction of man should signify a certain imperious power.
For just as in this life instruments are suitably fitted by craftsmen for whatever uses, so our nature is constructed by the most excellent Artificer as a certain thing congruous to the work of rule, which, whether according to the prerogative of the soul or according to the habit of the body, would be such as should appear more opportune for commanding. In short, the soul—that which is royal and most sublime, sundered far from private lowliness of its substance—is hence more clearly declared, in that it is subjected to no one's rule, having the freedom of choice, and dispensing itself by its own will and governance; for whose property is this, save the one who commands?
Over and above these things, the Lord of the whole creation, made to the image of his Creator, indicates nothing else than that straightway in him a royal nature was formed. For just as, according to human custom, those who fashion the image of princes not only imitate the impression of his form, but also depict the royal dignity by the purple robe, and the image itself is already by custom called emperor; so also the human substance—since it was being founded for the rule of others on account of the likeness of the King of the universe—is composed as a certain living image, partaking of the primal form both in name and in honour, not by a covering wrapped about with purple, nor by sceptre or diadem intimating the glory of its dignity:
For no royal form, properly speaking, is seen to reside in these things; but in place of a purple robe she is clothed with virtue, which is approved as more precious than all royal ornaments; and in place of a sceptre she is upheld by blessedness and immortality; and with the royal diadem of righteousness she is adorned as with a crown. So that through all these things it is shown that the beauty begotten unto royal dignity diligently expresses in itself the likeness of the primal Form. CHAPTER V. That man is shown to be the likeness of sovereignty. But the divine beauty, it is clear, is not adorned by any outward garb or appearance, nor by the brightness of any colour, but is set forth by an ineffable honour of felicity.
For just as painters transfer the forms of men onto panels by means of certain colours, mixing the proper and fitting pigments, so that the grace of the primal form passes over into a likeness by a most diligent transformation: so do I understand that the Fashioner of our substance, as it were by certain colours of the virtues, bestowed a wondrous beauty upon His own image, expressing in us His proper sovereignty. Now manifold and multiform are the colours of this image, by which the likeness of the true Form is depicted.
It is not white lead and rouge, nor any quality of these mixed one with another, nor the laying-on of some black that lines the eyelids and the eyes, and the contour fashioned hollow and sunken by some blending, or whatever like things the hand of the painter has composed by the skill of the craftsman; but in place of these there is present purity, impassibility, blessedness, the turning-away from all evil, and whatever else is of this kind, through which the divine likeness is imprinted in men. With such flowers did the wondrous Creator adorn His own image, that is, the nature of our condition.
But if you examine also the other things through which the divine glory shines forth, these too you will assuredly find preserved intact in the image after His likeness; for the supreme Godhead is mind and word. For in the beginning was the Word; and those who, according to Paul, make progress profess that they have the mind of Christ, who speaks in them. Do not, therefore, behold these things as far removed from human nature: for in you also there is both word and understanding, which imitate the Word and Mind divine. Likewise charity, and the fountain of charity; for this, says that great John, because charity is of God. This, as it were a person, Christ the Fashioner of our substance, bestowing it upon us, says:
By this shall all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love one toward another. But if this love be lacking in us, the whole appearance and figure of the image shall be dissolved. The Godhead also beholds and hearkens to all things and searches out all things. You too have, through your eyes and ears, the living efficacy of this matter, and you know that you possess an understanding that searches out the things that are. CHAPTER VI. An inquiry as to what relation the mind bears to nature, in which also the doctrine of the Eunomians is incidentally refuted. Let no one suspect me of saying that the divine power, after the likeness of human operation, embraces all things by diverse effects.
For it is not lawful to perceive in that divine simplicity a varied and manifold power of operation; nor indeed in us are there many efficacious powers of things and causes, although the things that pertain to life seem to come about by a manifold operation. For there is implanted in us a single power, namely of the mind, which running out through each of the senses lays hold of the things that are presented to it. This through the eyes beholds the things to be seen; this through the ears hears the things that are spoken; this in those things which are desirable rejoices, and from those which are judged unpleasant turns away. With the hands too it accomplishes whatever it wills, retaining things and again casting them off, and using the effects of these instruments as it judges expedient.
If then in man, for whom the diverse functions of the members have been fashioned by their Author, it is one and the same thing that operates through all the senses, using each fittingly as the occasion may demand, nor by the differences of operations does it change the force and power of its nature: how much more in God, although the effects of His powers be diverse, ought no one to suspect His essence to be manifold? For He that planted the ear, does He not hear? Or He that fashioned the eye, does He not consider? As the prophet testifies, by these examples insinuating operations of this kind as it were certain most familiar impressions of human nature: For let us make, says God, man unto our image and likeness.
But where now will the abominable heresy of the Eunomians stand for me? What will they say against this utterance? How by these words will they defend the novelty of their doctrine? Is it possible, they will say, that one image should reflect the likeness of dissimilar forms? For if, according to their opinion, the Son is unequal to the nature of the Father, how did God form one image of diverse natures? For He who said, Let us make man unto our image, insinuating to us the holy Trinity by the plural signification, would by no means have testified to His image in the singular, if the primal Forms had stood dissimilar to one another. For it is not possible that of those which least agree with one another, one single likeness should be shown;
but if the natures had been diverse, He would assuredly have formed diverse images of them, each suited to each. Or is it because there is indeed one image, but the form of the image is not one? Who is so bereft of understanding that he can fail to know that those things which are approved as like to one single thing preserve also, beyond all doubt, their own likeness to one another? And perhaps for this reason the divine word, foreseeing this malice in the constitution of human life, and cutting off the perversity of the Eunomians, says: Let us make man unto our image and likeness. CHAPTER VII. Why naked man is approved as wanting natural weapons and coverings.
But what does the very uprightness of his posture intend; and why are the effects of bodily strength not co-born with him for life, but rather man is brought into this life naked, unarmed even with natural coverings, helpless and most destitute of all necessary things, who, by what is seen, would appear to be worthy of compassion rather than of felicity? For he is not armed by the production of horns, nor fortified with the protection of claws or teeth, nor is any death-bearing venom infused into some sting—with which things most of the beasts and serpents are by nature equipped for their own defence;
nor is his body covered with hair, although it would have been fitting that he who was set forth for the sovereignty over others should be fenced about by natural provision with his own weapons, lest for his own guarding he should need the aids of others. But as it now is, the lion indeed, and the boar, and the tiger, and the leopard, or whatever is like to these, naturally possesses strength sufficient for its own safety; the bull has horns, the hare swiftness, the stag both leaping and a sure gaze, and other living creatures size, and to yet others a projecting member of the mouth, which the common folk call a trunk; to flying things too the office of wings, and to bees a sting; and to absolutely all it is established that some natural means of defence has been conferred for use.
But man alone above all is believed to be destitute, and is recognized as slower than those that excel in swiftness of running, slighter than those that stand out in bulk of body, and despised by those too that excel in natural weapons. And how, someone will say, did the lord of all obtain such a sovereignty? But to this I think it is in no way difficult to demonstrate that, through that very thing which is believed to be lacking to our nature, a sure occasion is given whereby he may attain the dominion of all things subject to him. For if man had been of such power that he could surpass the horse in swiftness, and his foot were not worn away but rested upon the prevailing firmness of hooves, and if he bore also horns or certain stings and avenging claws:
first indeed he would be like the beasts, and would appear difficult at the very encounter, such aids being naturally bestowed upon his body; and next he would scorn to exercise dominion over others whose helps he would in no way need. But as it now is, the use of our life is apportioned among the several things that are made over to us, so that we may see that a sovereignty over them is altogether necessary; for the slowness of our body and its difficulty in swift movement made us employ the foresight of horses; and moreover, providing through the yearly returns of wool those supplements that were lacking to nature, and through other resources also are supplied the things necessary to life that were wanting.
Beasts of burden have been made subject to us for carrying heavy loads; and because we cannot graze upon grass after the manner of animals, we have taken care to make oxen serve our use, that by their labour we may more easily procure our food. And because we needed biting and teeth for the restraining and avenging of such beasts, what was lacking to us the nature of dogs supplied, which also, with its inborn swiftness, has been assigned to our uses as a kind of living sword; and in place of horns or claws, iron stronger and more penetrating was invented by men. This does not always cleave to us by nature, as do those defences to the irrational beasts; but, affording protection in time of war, the sword thereafter remains idle.
Likewise the use of this same iron is taken up in place of the crocodile's scales. And there are times when the very hide of that beast affords protection in battle; otherwise (as has been said) iron is shaped by the craftsman after its likeness, which, serving necessity by arming a man in time of war, forsakes him in peace. The flying creatures too have been made serviceable to our uses, and their very swiftness has not escaped the ingenuity of reason; for some of them, when tamed, appear to cooperate, while others by their very presence become the means of capturing yet others that are applied to our advantages. But winged darts also a refined art has perfected for us, which, drawn taut by the bow, has rendered a flying course to human affairs.
And as for the fact that the soles of our feet are too easily worn down for the completing of a journey, this enjoins upon us the necessary aids of the things subject to us, from which footwear may be fittingly fashioned. CHAPTER VIII. Why man's posture is upright, and for what reason hands have been given, in which also a certain discussion concerning the differences of the souls of nature is introduced. But that man's posture is upright and lifts itself toward heaven and looks upward, it is most certain that these are principal gifts, attesting his royal power. Finally, that he alone has been so formed, while the bodies of all the rest are prone and inclined more downwardly, a manifest difference of his honour is shown:
since it is established that the one is subject to this power, while the other exists as of pre-eminent dignity. For in all the others the foremost members of the body are the feet, because what is sloping forward needed assuredly the support of firmness. But in the constitution of man these members have been made hands, because by the uprightness of his posture a single step seemed to be sufficient, which by a careful provision should establish the steadfastness of standing upon a pair of feet. The hands too have been fitted for other purposes, for the use of reason; and if anyone should say that the service of the hands is proper to the rational nature, he would by no means err.
For I look not only to that which is common and ready to our understanding, namely that we mark words in letters by the ministry of the hand—and indeed even this is no grace unequal to the rational dignity, that we are able also to speak by letters and in a certain manner to converse with the hands, reposing our utterance in the figures of the elements. But I, intending something quite other, affirm that the hands obey the command of reason by a certain zeal of cooperation. Yet before we examine this same matter, let us inquire more at large into the reason which we have rather passed over. For almost the order of the things made, and the cause for the sake of which they precede, has lain hidden from us.
Let the earth bring forth green things, then let the irrational animals follow after, and so, after the creation of these, in the third place let man be formed. For perhaps by these things we perceive not only those which are manifest, namely that for the sake of the beasts above all the Creator of the universe established the nature of herbs, and for the sake of men created the beasts. Whence too He brought forth before the flocks their pasturage, and before man those things which could afford the aids of human life. But to me it seems that the sequence of this discourse intimates some doctrine concerning hidden things. For thus Moses, by divine command, reserved as a mystery for philosophy the account of the state of the soul, concerning which indeed even external learning has imagined something for itself;
but it did not clearly discern the things that were to be seen. By these things, therefore, as I judge, reason itself teaches that this vital and animal power is declared in three differences. For the nature of herbs is adapted only to growth and to nourishment, affording fitting increase to those that are fed by it; it is also called the germinative, and the same substance is perceived in shrubs and trees. But there is in these very things that germinate a certain vital power, deprived of the animation of sense.
But besides this there is yet another kind of life, to which the Creator both conferred increase and commanded that it be dispensed by the senses, which we readily behold in the nature of the irrational creatures, which not only, like a growing herb, is nourished and nourishes, but is also recognized to possess a sentient power. But the perfect, third life of the body has been constituted in the rational essence of man, which both is nourished and nourishes and feels, and, partaking of reason, is quickened by mind. We ought, however, to know that there exists a certain division of the things that are according to such a reckoning, so that one part is intellectual, another corporeal. But let the division of the intellectual essence in its own property be now passed over; for we have no occasion of discourse upon this matter.
But of corporeal substance, one part is altogether without life, another partakes of life: again, of the vital corporeal things, some are sentient, others lacking sense, as are also our hairs and nails. Likewise the sentient things are divided into the natures of the rational and the irrational. Therefore, after inanimate matter, the lawgiver first set forth, as a kind of foundation, this germinative substance; thereafter he disclosed the generation of those things which are contained by the senses alone. And because, according to this sequence, those things which have obtained life in the flesh, the sentient indeed, are seen to subsist of themselves apart from the intelligible, while the rational substance cannot be beheld in any other than a sentient body;
therefore after the germinative things and the beasts, man was made, nature, by a certain way, advancing in sequence toward perfection. For of all the kinds—that is, both of the growing germination and of the sentient living creature—man, this rational animal, partakes. For the quality of the soul is nourished according to its natural substance, but obtains the power of increase by the sentient administration; which, according to a certain mode of its own, being placed midway between the intellectual and the material substance, in proportion as it is coarser by comparison with the former, is by so much seen to be purer by its precedence over the latter.
Then that which is most subtle and most luminous in the sentient thing, being joined to the intellectual, becomes a certain fitting commingling of nature, so that man is seen to subsist in these three. For we know that the Apostle too intimates some such thing, where, praying for the Thessalonians, he says: And may the very God of peace sanctify you wholly, that your whole spirit and soul and body may be preserved without complaint unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ: placing the body for the nutritive part, the soul for the sentient, the spirit for the intellectual. Likewise the Lord too, in the Gospel, instructing the scribe, sets the love of the Lord before every commandment, which is fulfilled with the whole heart and with the whole soul and with the whole mind.
For in the present passage too the discourse seems to me to offer this same difference of interpretation: calling the heart the more corporeal efficacy, signifying the soul to hold the middle seat, and intimating the mind to be the loftier substance of the rational and perspicacious power. Whence the Apostle too knows three distances of the wills: the carnal, which is enslaved only to the vicious pleasures concerning the belly and the lower parts; the animal, which is engaged midway between virtue and malice, surpassing the latter indeed but in no way partaking of the sincerity of the former; and the spiritual, which attains the spirituality of a manner of life pleasing to God.
For thus, writing to the Corinthians, he reproaches them with their pursuit of the way of pleasure and of the possible, saying: Are you not carnal, and do you not walk according to man? that is, you are proved incapable of the more perfect teachings. And elsewhere, making a certain comparison of this middle way to that loftier and more perfect one, he says: But the animal man perceives not the things that are of the Spirit of God. For it is foolishness to him, and he cannot understand, because it is spiritually examined; but the spiritual man judges all things, and he himself is judged by no one. Finally, just as the animal surpasses the carnal, so by the same measure the spiritual also excels the animal.
That, therefore, Scripture records man to have been made last after all things, secretly informs us that we ought to philosophize on nothing else than the state of the soul, by a certain necessary consequence of things, intimating indeed that perfect thing to come among the last. For the rational nature contains the others also, both the increase of germination and the sense of the living creature; the sentient nature too embraces, without doubt, the germinative kind. But this latter, because it is immaterial, embraces itself alone. Consequently, therefore, nature, as it were by certain steps—I mean of the properties of life—ascends from the lower to the more perfect. CHAPTER IX. That the constitution of man has been most aptly framed for the work of reason.
Since, therefore, man is a rational animal, it behoved that an instrument of the body conformable to the use of reason should be instituted. For just as we see those most skilled in music exercise their practice of melody according to the kind of instrument, and that the lyre is not played with the strings of the trumpet, nor the trumpets sounded as one harps: after this manner the construction of the instruments had to be consonant with reason, so that it might most aptly be able to resound to the use of speech, which is formed by the offices of the vocal members.
For this reason hands have been fitted to the body; and although it would be most easy to enumerate a thousand uses of this present life which these opportune and durable instruments of the hands diligently administer, fulfilling fittingly every art and every operation in war and peace, nevertheless above all others it is for the sake of reason that nature fittingly set the hands upon the body. For if man had existed without hands, assuredly, by the necessity of taking in food, the members of his face would have been formed after the fashion of quadrupeds, so that his face would have been drawn out long and would have projected in the nostrils, and the lips of his mouth would have been callous and thicker and most firm;
and fitted for plucking grass, and the tongue too would be harder and rougher, of a larger body, that it might cooperate with the teeth, being more fluid for the things it should take in to be chewed, and on either side more spread out, such as is that of dogs and of the others that feed on flesh, coursing through the rough intervals of the teeth. If, therefore, hands were not present to the body, how could an articulate voice be shaped for it, since such a formation of his mouth would by no means be suited to the use of speech, so that it would be necessary for man either to emit bleatings, or barkings, or to neigh like a horse, or to give a voice similar to oxen and asses, or to bring forth some bestial roar?
But as it now is, the hands have been accommodated to the body, so that the mouth might remain free for the ministry of the word; therefore it is something proper to the rational nature to have hands upon the body, in such wise that, the Creator of all granting the faculty, through them comes the office of speech. When, therefore, God conferred some divine sovereignty of grace or of the image, and bestowed the gifts of His good things upon the rational creature, on that account He indeed gave the remaining good things to human nature with a pious liberality more abundantly; but as for mind and understanding, it is not proper to say that He gave them, but that He conferred the glory proper to His own nature, bestowing it upon the image.
Therefore, since the mind is a certain intelligible and incorporeal thing, it would in some way possess an incommunicable grace, unless it intimated the motions of its operation by certain devices. For the sake of this it needed this construction of members, so that, touching the vocal instruments after the manner of a plectrum, it might interpret its internal motion by the quality of sounds. And just as if someone imbued with the art of music should not, by some affliction, have his own voice, and, wishing to make his discipline manifest, should emulate it by alien voices, publishing his art by lyre or pipe:
so the human mind, although it is proved to be the inventor of intellections of every kind, and the bare soul cannot declare the impulses of its understanding to those who hear through the senses of the body, touching as it were by a certain modulation these instruments more artfully endowed with life, by their sounds manifests the hidden things of its understanding. And we can consider this mingled and varied music in the instruments of the human members, which, as it were a lyre and a pipe, resound the very same thing to one another by a certain harmony.
For that vessel which receives the breath, whenever it is struck by the impulse of one speaking, and has formed into voice that part which is rebounded by the inner passages, those rounded parts which have been made after the fashion of pipes assuredly imitate that voice which is uttered from pipes, which the membranes projecting round about set in motion. But the cavity above, gradually receiving the sound from the lower parts, and reaching by twin tubes as far as the nostrils, breaks the voice about the places of the strainer, and produces greater sounds; and there is too the wondrous formation of the jaws and tongue and throat, in keeping with which the chin, drawn down by a gentle flow, is sharpened into a rounded shape.
But all these things seem to resemble the motion of strings, which the mouth (as has been said), touching in the stead of a plectrum, composes the modes with exceeding swiftness, variously and manifoldly in its season, according as the work shall demand: while the opening and closing of the lips does the very same thing which the fingers do that take the breath of the pipe according to the consonance of the modulation; and the discerning mind, through these instruments of the members, modulates reason in us, by which also we are proved to be made rational—not, as I think, in any way otherwise possessing the grace of reason. Without this provision we should be compelled to procure a grievous and laborious servitude only by the uses of the lips for the body.
But as it now is, the hands, transferring this office to themselves, have left the mouth free for the ministry of speech. CHAPTER X. That through the senses the mind operates. But let a twofold effect of this instrument be considered. For one part of it works speech, while another is at leisure to receive the intelligences that come from without; nor is the one mingled with the other, but each fulfils the operation which nature has constituted, bringing no trouble to its neighbour. For neither does the hearing speak, nor does the voice hear. For this latter always brings forth something, while the hearing, ever receiving, is not filled up.
As Solomon in a certain place has testified—which also to me seems to be especially, above all the things in us, most worthy of admiration—how great is that breadth of capacity within, into which flow together all the things that are poured in by hearing; who are those recorders that inscribe the memorials of the senses that enter in; how ample are the receptacles of the intelligences, which are stored up within through the ears; and how, although the things that are placed therein are both many and manifold, yet no confusion or error at all is engendered with regard to the proper position of the things that are brought in. Likewise too, who could estimate the efficacy of sight?
For equally through the eyes the mind apprehends those things which are outside the body, and draws into itself the likenesses of the things appearing, describing for itself the figures of the things like to them. And just as if some city capable of holding a multitude receives those flowing in by diverse entrances, yet not all assemble into one place of the city, but some hasten to the forum, others to their dwellings, others to the churches and the squares, each according to his own purpose: in some such way let one consider also the city of our mind constituted within, which, though our senses fill it by diverse entrances, yet the same mind, judging and discerning each kind of those entering in, disposes all things in the places fitting for understanding.
And as in the example of the city, we see men of one nation and kindred enter not by the same gates, but some by one entrance, others by another, as chance offers, yet nonetheless, once made within the walls, they are again together, who were joined by mutual familiarity: so, on the contrary, you may grant that it is possible that those who are strangers or unknown to one another should often use one entrance of the city, yet not be coupled together by the common entry; for they can, once constituted within, be separated into their dwellings. Something of this kind too I behold able to come about in the breadth of our mind. For frequently from diverse senses one knowledge is gathered for us, which distributes the same thing through the manifold variety of the senses.
And likewise it is to be seen, contrary to this, that from some one sense many and various things, in no way concordant or consonant with one another according to nature, are thoroughly learned. As, for example, let it be proposed (for it is better to elucidate the thought by examples) that something be inquired concerning the property of qualities—what is pleasant to the senses, and what is to be shunned by those that taste. For experience itself discovers the bitterness of gall and the most agreeable quality of honey. Since, therefore, these are certain, the same thing, sought out in manifold ways by our understanding—that is, through taste, sight, hearing, smell, and frequently also touch—confers one knowledge.
For when someone of us sees a thing, and hears its name, and perceives its taste, and senses its smell, and tests it by touch, he recognizes one and the same object through all the senses. Likewise too we embrace and grasp various and manifold things through any single one of the senses; for hearing receives manifold voices, and the sight of the eyes possesses an undivided and manifold power for beholding things that are diverse in kind. For in like manner it contemplates white and black and all the things that are set apart from one another by contrariety of colour; just as smell does, just as taste, and touch is proved by its own operations to take in the knowledge of things of every sort. CHAPTER XI. On the essence of the soul.
What then is the mind according to its own proper nature, which distributes itself to the sensory powers and through each of them duly takes up the knowledge of the things that exist? For that it is something other than sense, I do not suppose any prudent person would doubt. For if the mind were the very same thing as sense, it would surely exist as a single property corresponding to the efficacy of sense, for the reason that it is itself simple, and nothing varied can be discerned in a thing that is simple.
But now, by the consent of all, touch is one thing, smell another, and the senses are mutually unchangeable and unmixed; and since the mind is present equally to each one of them, it must be defined as something other than the sensory substance, lest any variety be ascribed to the intelligible reality. 'Who has known the mind of the Lord?' says the Apostle; but I say: Who has been able to consider his own mind? Let those speak who think they can comprehend the nature of God, whether they consider themselves, whether they know the substance of their own mind;
whether it is something manifold and of varied composition, how it is inserted into the manifold senses, how that which is varied exists in singleness, how that which is single is found in variety. But I have come upon the solution of this most difficult question by having recourse to the divine voice itself: 'Let us make,' it says, 'man after our image and likeness.' For so long as the image departs in nothing from the things that subsist in the primal form, it is properly recognized as an image; but if the copy has receded from the likeness, in respect of that part it will not be an image. Since therefore this too is one of the things considered in the divine nature, namely that it is held to be of an incomprehensible essence, it is necessary that the image also should imitate the substance of the primal form.
But if our nature could comprehend the images, while the primal form remains in its own comprehensibility, then by this very contrariety, by which it is comprehended, it is proved to be unlike. Furthermore, since the nature of our mind, which was made after the image, escapes human knowledge, it reflects, by its own incomprehensibility, the omnipotence of the incomprehensible Nature which it expresses. CHAPTER XII. Inquiry where the ruling part of man may be seen to be, and concerning tears and laughter. Let every conjectural and empty discourse be silent, which encloses the power of intellectual operation within a thousand bodily things: from among which some place that which is the ruling part of man in the heart;
others, however, suspect that it resides in the brain, strengthening the opinion by some surface plausibility of persuasions. For he who places the ruling part of man in the heart strives to set forth the arguments of his reasoning from the situation of the place, because it seems to occupy the middle position of the whole body, inasmuch as a spontaneous motion, displaying itself more easily from the middle to the whole body, may break out into whatever effects it wills. And to this reasoning they seem to bring forward as witnesses the saddening and irascible affections of man: namely that passions of this kind seem to move this part to sympathy.
But those who believe the brain to be the dwelling-place of intelligence assert that the head was constructed by nature as a kind of citadel of the whole body, in which they declare the mind to dwell like a queen, surrounded on every side by the senses as by certain messengers or guards. These men too suggest signs of such a surmise, namely that the mind is then led away from right counsel and from what is fitting, when the membrane of the brain is disturbed, and that those whom drunkenness weighs down pass their lives in ignorance of decency. And to these they add certain natural causes also, by which they seem to confirm their several opinions which they advance concerning the ruling part of man.
And this one indeed affirms a kinship of the motions of the mind with the fiery nature of the heart, because both the mind and fire are proved to be a sleepless substance; and since he confesses that the mind flows into the part of the heart, he therefore maintains that the motion of the mind is tempered by the mobility of heat, declaring the heart to be the receptacle of the intelligible nature, in which heat overflows.
But the other testifies that the membrane of the brain is, as it were, the principle and root of all the senses, and confirms his reasoning by this proof, that the operation of intelligence is set in no other place than in that part where both the ears, fitted to receive, take in the rushing voices, and the gaze, concentrated in the very depths of the eyes, transmits inward the forms of images that meet the pupils, and the qualities of the various smells, drawn in, are distinguished. The sense too which is accomplished by taste is approved by the evidence of the little membrane of the brain (as has been said above), which from nearby interweaves certain little branches of nerves, sensitive by their very nature, through the joints of the neck right up to those places which exist after the manner of a strainer, and the muscles lying round about.
But I, since the intelligence of the soul is often disturbed by the onset of passion, and since the operation of thought is dulled in proportion to its natural vigour, declare it to be true that this same thing comes about through a certain sickness of the body; and I do not deny that the heart is a kind of fountain of bodily heat, which is easily moved to irascible impulses. None the less, that the little membrane of the brain presides over the things of sense, according to the reasoning of those who treat of these matters by natural disputation, embracing the brain beneath it, which (so I hear from those who have occupied themselves with anatomical inspections) is also nourished by the vapour of fatness—this I by no means hold to be, as the saying goes, of no account;
but I will not strive to prove from these things that an incorporeal substance is enclosed within certain local boundaries. For we have learned that irrational frenzies arise not from the heaviness of the head. But the most skilled of physicians, when both sides, by which the little membranes of the same brain are held, have been disturbed by some affection, pronounce our rational part to be sick, calling it the frenetic affection, because the name 'frenes' belongs to those same little membranes. Similarly too those who suspect that the heart is affected by sadness are assuredly deceived. For since it is not the heart but the mouth of the stomach that is disturbed by grief, they ignorantly transfer the discomfort of this malady to the heart.
But those who have taken care diligently to investigate the causes of the passions discourse thus: that in grief, when the channels of evaporation of the whole body are naturally compressed and shut up, whatever is prevented from going out through these passages of respiration is forced into the deepest seats of the inner parts. Whence, when the viscera are straitened, sadness is kindled, and often a more violent breath is drawn from the depths, that what is contracted may be dilated. And this exhalation which grief thrusts out we also call a groan, that is, the sign of excessive pain.
But those who think that the little part of the heart is affected by this same passion (as I have said) are deceived, since this distress belongs not to the heart but to the mouth of the stomach, from that occasion which we have mentioned, namely that, when the passages of evaporation are compressed, the straitened little bladder of the gall pours out that bitter and biting humour into the mouth of the stomach. And this is the proof of this matter, that in the dejected the very surface of the colour is seen to be overspread as with a jaundice (aurigine), while the humour of the gall is diffused in the veins by excessive constriction. But this account is most especially commended also by that malady which seems to be contrary to this, that is, the one which comes from joy and laughter.
For in a certain manner the evaporations of the whole body are dilated and loosened through some pleasure, when a most agreeable sensation has been perceived. For just as in the former case, through grief, the thin and uncertain respirations are again compressed, and, constricting the disposition of the inner parts, drive up to the head and to the membrane of the brain a moist vapour, which, much running about in the hollows beneath, through the passages left for evaporation, rushes to the eyes, and by the compression of the eyelids is poured out in drops—and this drop is named a tear—so it is to be understood from the contrary affliction:
when the channels of respiration are distended more than usual, the breath inserts itself into the deep recesses, and is forthwith driven out by nature through the passage of the mouth, while all the viscera, and especially the liver (as those say who are skilled about these matters), by a certain agitation and most fervent motion, drive this conceived breath outward. Whence nature, having contrived a certain ease for the exits of this same breath, opens the gape of the mouth crosswise, distending both cheeks, and what is thereby effected has received the name of laughter.
Not on this account, therefore, is the ruling part of man to be thought to be in the liver, nor on account of the fervour of the blood, which abounds copiously about the regions of the heart, nor on account of the irascible affections is the lodging of the mind to be reckoned to be in the heart. But these things are to be referred to bodily qualities. The mind, however, must be believed to reach the several members equally, according to the ineffable tempering of reason. And if some adduce Scripture to us for this purpose, so as to testify that the ruling part of man is in the heart, we ought not to perceive it by an unexamined reasoning. For he who made mention of the heart also asserted the reins, saying: 'God searches the hearts and reins.' So it will be permissible to enclose this intellectual part of man either in both or in neither.
But that these same intellectual energies are dulled, or even exist altogether without effect, through the quality of bodily affection—having been taught this, I do not judge it a sufficiently suitable argument that I should assert the power of the mind to be contained in any places, as though it could be expelled from its proper breadth by swellings when the parts are occupied. For this is a corporeal opinion, that a vessel pre-occupied by things put into it can in no way receive anything else. For the intellectual substance neither lingers in the empty and hollow parts of the body, nor is thrust out by the magnitude or mass of the flesh.
But since the whole body of man is established, as it were, like a certain musical instrument, and it generally happens that those who are skilled in music cannot display their discipline because of the maiming of the instrument that refuses the diligence of the art—because it has either been spoiled by time, or broken by some accident, or worn away by rust or moisture, and therefore remains without the effects of sounds, although it be breathed into by one skilled in the art of the flute-player—so too the mind, passing through the whole instrument of the body, duly reaches the parts with intellectual operations, as nature has made it apt: and in those parts indeed which remain according to their substance it puts forth the force of its operation;
but in those which, through some defect, cannot admit its skilful motion, it exists apart from the effect of operation. For naturally, in a certain manner, the mind is apt to be properly and fittingly engaged in those members which are quickened by their own soundness; but to be wholly alienated from those which are afflicted by some infirmity. CHAPTER XIII. A certain natural contemplation concerning matter and nature and the inspection of the mind. To me, however, there seems to be in this part a contemplation that is more than natural, through which we can be informed of something of the more useful doctrines.
Since therefore the best and highest good, pre-eminent above all, is the Divinity itself, to which all things recur, whatsoever are contained by the desire of the good, we therefore also confess that the mind, inasmuch as it was made after the image of the most beautiful Creator, keeps a certain likeness to the primal form, and that it exists wholly among the best things; but if it be outside of that, it is at the same time stripped of that beauty in which it was. But just as we say that the mind is adorned by the likeness of the beauty of the principal form,
shining like a certain mirror with the impression of the pre-eminent one, by the same reasoning we believe that nature too is contained by the mind, by which it is dispensed and ruled, and is adorned by its appearance, having been made like a certain mirror of a mirror. By nature also we profess that this material part of our substance is sustained, about which that same nature is contemplated. Since therefore the one is contained by the other, through these the participation of all that supreme and true one duly flows, through the higher that which appears lower being adorned. But if at any time there comes about a sundering of this good communion, and on the contrary the higher follows after the lower, then let the deformity of matter itself appear when it is deserted by nature.
For matter in itself is a certain formless and ill-composed thing, and by this its formlessness the beauty of nature is at the same time seized upon, the beauty which is adorned by the liveliness of the mind: and thus the deformity of matter is derived even to the mind itself through the defect of nature, so that the image of God can no longer be discerned in this impression of the moulded thing; for, like a certain mirror, that is, the form of goodness and virtue, placing itself behind one's back, casts away indeed the brightness of its surpassing splendour, but takes wholly into itself the formlessness of matter: and in this way comes about the birth of evil, creeping in by the privation of good. But good is whatsoever is joined to the supreme Good;
but if it be outside the likeness of this disposition, it will without doubt remain without good. Since therefore, according to the reasoning we have inspected, it is established that the supreme good is that which is truly good, and the mind was made after the image of the supreme good, and itself received that it should be well with it; while the figure which the mind contains is proved to be, as it were, a certain image of an image: by this it is shown that our material part then well subsists and is well contained, when it is dispensed and ruled by nature. But again it is dissolved and cast down, when it is deprived of its provision, and at the same time is cut off from the conjunction of the good;
but this comes about in no other way than when a turning to the contrary part of nature has been made, and its desire does not advance toward the supreme good, but declines from it, in that it seems always to lack beauty. For it is necessary that that which attains its likeness should be conformed to the most despicable and foulest deformity of matter. But these things have been said by us by a certain logical consequence, supplied through the inspection set before us. This, however, was being inquired into, whether the intellectual power is located in some part of the members, or is dispersed through all the limbs with equal balance.
For to those who (as was said above) enclose the mind in local parts, and bring forward for the demonstration of their opinion that the intellect of those whose membrane of the brain is disturbed contrary to nature does not prosper, reason shows that through all the parts of the human frame each member naturally operates as it is fitted. But similarly the power of the soul subsists apart from its efficiency, when some part of the body does not remain in its nature. And for these reasons there has been offered to our discourse, as a consequence, the inspection set forth, through which we may learn that in the construction of man the mind is governed indeed by God, but our material life is contained by the mind, so long as it persists in its nature;
but if it depart from nature, it is necessary that it also be deprived of the cooperation of the mind. But let us return again to the point from which we digressed: that, if in those things which altogether deviate from their natural constitution through some passion, the mind keeps its proper effect, and in those things indeed which flourish it remains unimpaired, but becomes powerless in those which cannot receive the force of its operation. It is right, however, to confirm the opinion of a doctrine of this kind from other matters also: and unless it be grievous and troublesome, though wearied with the present discourse, I will explain even concerning these few points, as best I can. CHAPTER XIV. Reasoning concerning sleep and yawning, and concerning dreams.
This material and flowing life of the body, always proceeding in motion, has its force and power of existing in this, that it never wholly ceases from motion, but, like a certain river running according to its own impetus, it indeed shows a full channel through which it glides down. Yet the same water is not seen to be about the same place, but one part of it runs across, while another comes after: so too this material part of the present life runs down through a certain motion of contraries with a frequent succession to itself, and it cannot stand still at all from its mutation, but, impatient of rest, it likewise possesses a continual turning of things. But if at any time it should cease from motion, it will at the same time also cease to exist;
as, for instance, emptiness relaxes fullness, and again fullness succeeds emptiness, sleep sustains the continual labour of wakefulness. And again wakefulness consolidates what seemed to have been loosened, and neither of these remains in the same state, but by a mutual presence each succeeds the other. And so nature, renewing itself by alternations of changes, passes, as it were, having received the part of either from the one to the other. For if the animal should always persist in activity, the strain would effect a rupture and tearing apart of the parts that are stretched: a continual rest of the bodies too would work a certain ruin and dissolution of the state.
But each perceived more moderately in due time will furnish strength for the continuance of the substance, which is repaired by a continual passage to contraries, with an alternating succession on either side. So therefore nature, having got an opportunity for rest, contrives how it may succour by sleep the vigour of the body wearied with wakefulness, and, the senses being withdrawn from operation, it imparts leisure for a time, restraining them, as it were, like horses after contests and sweats. Rest, moreover, is necessary for the body, that without impediment the food too may be diffused into all the members by hidden paths of its own, no obstacle of strain shutting off the passable transit.
For just as from earth soaked with rains, when it has been warmed by the rays of the sun, certain misty vapours are drawn out from its deep boundaries, similarly it comes about in our earth too: when food is cooked within by the innate heat, a certain vapour naturally, being as it were aerial, strives toward the upper parts, and, like smoke penetrating through the chinks of a wall, reaches the regions of the head, thence being exhaled through the aforesaid connections to the senses. Whence it is necessary that the senses then keep leisure, detained by the passage of the vapours. The eyes are lulled to sleep, and are covered by the drawing down of the eyelids as by a certain even weight of mechanical art:
by these same vapours hearing too is obstructed, and, as by a certain door set upon the ears, it takes holiday from its natural operation. But such an affection of this kind is called sleep, the senses being idle in the body and, according to natural motion, doing nothing at all, so that the digestions of food may proceed with an easier exit, and run across their channels by exhalation itself. Wherefore, if those places which are about the senses be straitened by these exhalations, and the senses be slowed by a certain occupation of sleep, they are filled with vapour;
and since they are constituted as composed of nerves, like those of the neck and throat, they are naturally stretched of themselves, so that through this stretching those things which had been compressed by the vapours may be thinned, as is wont to be done by those who, twisting infused garments by excessive compression, strive to squeeze out all the moisture;
and since the parts which are about the throat seem to be more rounded, and abound in nerves, as has been said, when at any time it is fitting to dispel from these the thickness of the vapours, since it is impossible for the rounded shape to be shown extended unless it accomplish this by its own configuration, therefore the breath, left in the yawn, draws the chin indeed downward toward the face with a certain hollowing, and, all things within being opened in a circle, that billowy thickness which had settled in those places is directed forth by the breath driving it. But frequently even after sleep this same thing is wont to happen to us, when something undigested has been left over from those vapours.
From these causes, therefore, the mind is evidently shown to be one, which seems to be congruous and consenting with nature: while it is awake, this too puts forth its effects, but when it is relaxed into sleep, the mind too remains immovable—unless perchance someone should reckon the imaginations of dreams to be the agitations of the mind, and should judge it to be operating through sleep by its own motions. But we constantly affirm that that action alone is to be referred to the mind which is accomplished by wisdom and counsel. But those vain wanderings of phantasms which arise through sleep, we suppose to be certain imaginings of the unseeing efficiency, which the irrational part of the soul fabricates through chance occurrences.
For the soul, being called away from the senses through sleep, must necessarily also be deprived of the effect of the mind. For through the senses a return of the mind to man is in some way effected, and, these being idle, the intelligence too must necessarily be at leisure: of which thing the proof is, that frequently in sleep we are mocked by the most absurd and most empty forms; which would by no means happen if the soul were then ruled by counsel and reason. But to me it seems that, when the more present power of the soul, that is, the efficiency of mind and of the senses, takes rest, that part of it alone operates in dreams which dispenses the nourishments and increases.
But if this is so, the dreams that occur and the imaginations agreeable to the senses and to the intelligence come about no doubt for this cause. Whatsoever has been impressed upon us through that part of the soul in which memory flourishes, these same things, as chance has brought them, are formed as it were by the work of the mouth's modelling, with a certain figuration continually adhering in this species of the soul by which memory is contained. By these phantasies, therefore, man is deluded, led not by the track of any order to the vision and conversation of the things that appear, but seduced by certain mixed and inconsequent errors.
For just as in the bodily work, while each member properly performs something according to the power naturally implanted in it, there comes also a certain consent of cooperation even of the member that is at rest, by the same logical consequence it is to be thought concerning the soul also. For when one part of it rests, while another is moved, the whole necessarily consents with the part, since it is not possible that the natural unity can then be divided, even though some part of its powers persists in operation. But just as, in those who are awake and busy, the mind indeed prevails, and the sense obeys it, and yet:
nevertheless that power which dispenses for the body is approved to be present, since the mind provides food for use, but the sense takes what has been provided, while that bodily power which watches over the nourishments properly acquires for itself what is given; so through sleep, the use of these powers being taken away, they are in a manner interchanged in us, and that which is proved to be more irrational prevails. The efficiency of the others indeed takes rest, yet is not altogether restrained. For then the power of the soul which attends upon the nourishments, although through sleep it strives toward the office of digestion and permits all nature to be at leisure for itself.
For that sensory power is not withdrawn from this its operation—for it is not lawful that what has once been naturally united can be torn apart—but its effect cannot shine forth, being hindered by the leisure of sleep. By this reasoning, therefore, when the mind turns itself to the form of the sensitive soul, it follows that, when this is moved, we should say that that too is moved likewise, and when it rests, that it rests in like manner. But just as it is natural for these things to come about concerning fire, that, when it is covered on every side with chaff and is roused by no vent-hole, it neither feeds upon what is covered around nor is utterly extinguished, but instead of flame smoke arises, while if it be a little stirred, straightway the smoke is roused into flame:
similarly the mind too, covered by the leisure of the senses in the time of sleep, can neither shine through them nor be wholly intercepted, but seems to operate after a manner of the highest sort, in one respect indeed lacking, in another prevailing: and just as some musician, when the bindings of the lyre are loosened, if he throw the plectrum upon the strings, the melody does not duly meet him (for what is not stretched will not aptly resound), but for the most part the hand is moved with art, leading the plectrum to the local positions of the accents, yet no sound is produced except a disordered one from the motion of the strings which the Greeks call βόμβον (a buzzing).
So, during sleep, when the bodily organs of the senses are relaxed in their nature, the craftsman-mind either rests altogether—if the body is weighed down by excessive fullness—or else works more sluggishly and obscurely, since it cannot employ this organ of sense more carefully for its art. For this reason, in dreams the memory is indeed confused, while foreknowledge, buried as it were beneath certain veils, contemplates certain images apart from any wish or effort, and now and then foretells something of the things that are to come. For by the subtlety of its nature it has somewhat more power than the grossness of the body to draw near to the contemplation of the things that appear; yet it cannot in right order unlock the future, because no clear and manifest teaching is set forth of those things which are perceived as arranged in dreams.
But whatever it is, the announcement of the future is made ambiguous—what those who seem to discern such things call an 'enigma'—because it shows one thing in words and brings another in meaning. Thus Pharaoh's cupbearer presses the grape-cluster into the cup, and thus the baker imagines that he carries loaves in a basket; for each in his sleep clearly sees himself engaged according to the occupation he had practiced. For the likenesses of their accustomed crafts, impressed upon the mind in its foreknowledge, granted, through every prophecy, the foretelling of what was to come.
But as for the fact that Daniel and Joseph and those like them, undisturbed in any of their senses, are informed by divine power for the knowledge of things to come—this has nothing to do with the present question; for no wise man ought to impute these to the various kinds of dreams. Otherwise he will also suppose that those visions which befall the waking by divine agency can come to pass, not by a heavenly visitation, but by the sequence of nature acting of its own accord.
Therefore, just as among all men who govern their own minds there are some who deserve to be enlightened by divine converse, so likewise, when the fantasies of dreams befall us commonly and similarly according to nature, some in their sleep come to share in a certain divine revelation; while for all the rest, even if some foreknowledge is begotten through a dream, it is begotten in the manner aforesaid. But if that Egyptian or that Assyrian tyrant is more divinely instructed through dreams unto the knowledge of the future, it is something else that is wrought through them by a wondrous dispensation. For it was fitting that the wisdom of the saints, which seemed hidden, should be made manifest, lest it pass through common life without profit or benefit.
For how could Daniel be recognized to be such, unless the effort of the enchanters and magicians had failed in attaining the dream? And how too would Egypt be saved, with Joseph set in prison, unless the interpretation of dreams had brought him forth into the midst? And therefore these things portend something other, nor are they to be weighed at all according to common fantasies; for the customary appearance of dreams is the same for all, which presents itself in very many ways by a certain semblance of imagination. For either, as has been said, there remain in that part of the soul wherein memory is contained the likenesses of the day's pursuits, or oftentimes the expression of dreams is prefigured by the qualities of bodily affections.
For thus he who thirsts marvels to find himself at fountains, and he who lacks food rejoices in delicacies, and the youth flourishing in his prime is mocked by the allurements of images, after the likeness of his passion. But I myself have learned through a dream yet another cause of healing enigmas. For a certain one of my kinsmen, seized by frenzy, when he was excessively oppressed because food had been offered him beyond what his strength required, supposed that many intestines full of dung were being heaped upon him. And when it was already nearly the moment when his wearied body should be relaxed by sweats, he earnestly besought those present to bring him water with which, as he lay, he might be drenched; nor did he cease demanding this with a cry, until the outcome of events resolved the cause of such complaints.
For at the same time both abundant sweat burst forth from his body, and the loosened belly interpreted the burden of the intestines. Therefore what nature then endured under its dulled health, it suffered in sympathy with the body's disorder, so that it indeed felt the distress, and yet because of the sickness could not clearly speak of it—and this, as is given to understand, would not have happened except from the discomfort; but since the mind was kept in safety by natural slumber, there assuredly came to be, for him who was thus afflicted, a dream: the water signifying the sweat, and the flux signifying the heaviness of the intestines; for the food intimates the heaviness and the pressure of what was moving him.
This same thing is also observed by very many skilled in medicine—namely, that according to the differences of afflictions, various appearances of dreams likewise befall the sick: some indeed to those failing in the stomach, others to those troubled by an affliction of the brain; others again to those who suffer from fever, and others to those endangered by bile and phlegm; and likewise unlike to these are the dreams of those who lie sick from repletion and from emptiness. From which it is possible to observe that that power of the soul by which nourishment and growth come to us has some particle of an intellectual thing joined to it in fellowship, so that, while the quality of the bodily affection in some way presents its likeness, it produces, according to the affliction that prevails, a corresponding imagination.
Likewise, for many also, according to the diversity of character, the visions of dreams are shaped. For some things belong to the brave man, others to the timid, others to the dissolute, and others to the self-controlled; one is mocked by liberal images, another by avaricious ones; but nowhere in these does the intelligence of the mind operate, but rather the more irrational part of the soul, as we have often said, produces these fantasies, and whatever pursuits one accustoms oneself to while waking, of these it preforms a likeness for itself in dreams. CHAPTER XV. That there is but one soul in the human body, consisting of a threefold power. But we have been led far from our purpose.
For our discourse had promised to demonstrate that the mind is not enclosed in any one part of the body, but ranges, equally diffused, through the whole, effecting its motion according to the nature of the subordinate part. But there is also a case where the mind itself, following the impulse of nature, expends in a manner the service of a kind of servitude. For frequently the nature of the body goes before, and brings on either occasions of gladness or causes of grief, so that it indeed furnishes the impulse—whether to crave food or to fulfill any other matter of pleasure. But the mind, receiving such motions of the flesh, prepares by the efforts of its own deliberation the accomplishment of the things considered.
But this happens not in all, but only in those who, being basely affected, subject the dominion of reason to the nods of nature, and who, by the votes of that same mind, slavishly comply with the pleasures of the senses. But in the more perfect it is certain that it does not so happen; with them the mind goes before in all things, and they carry out what is fitting by reason rather than by passion, and nature follows the straight footsteps of the mind that goes before.
But since reason apprehends three distinctions of the vital power—that is, the nutritive, which receives growth on account of certain senses; the sensitive, which is so nourished that it may perceive; and the rational, which is perfect and is extended through all these—therefore it must be noted that one power is merely vital, another sensitive, and the third, beyond the rest, also rational. But let no one on this account suppose that there are three souls in the constitution of man, circumscribed by their own limits, and believe it to be welded together as it were out of many; whereas the true and perfect soul is one, by nature spiritual and intelligible, which through the senses is mingled with the material substance.
But everything material and corporeal, which is in change and alteration, if indeed it partakes of the animate power, obtains its motion through increase. But if it withdraws from the operation of life, it will attest its motion by corruption. Therefore neither does sense operate on account of the material substance, nor does the intellectual power in us operate on account of the senses. CHAPTER XVI. That properly the soul of man both is and is called rational, and that the soul, poured through the whole body, nowhere has a fixed seat.
Since certain creatures rely only on this power by which they are nourished and grow, while others prevail by the power of the senses—and these are proved to partake neither of that sensible nor of this rational substance—on this account someone might suspect that there is a multitude of souls, since he does not define their difference by a fitting reason; for whatever exists in things, if indeed it is called so perfectly and wholly, properly is what it is said to be. But if it does not exist in all respects as what it is called, an empty name is thought to be ascribed to it—as, for instance, that it does not display the force of the thing; for we say that a name is properly imposed upon a subject.
But if someone should display a likeness of true bread, fashioned out of stone, to which the very form belongs, whose magnitude appears equal, and which moreover presents the same likeness of color, so that by many tokens it is thought to be true—yet there is lacking to it the power to be food—on that account we say that the stone has received the appellation of 'bread' not properly or naturally, but only by abuse; just as other things, according to the same reasoning, which are not in all respects what they are called, have their name from abuse.
Thus, therefore, the soul too, since it possesses its perfection wholly in reason and intellect, whatever is not this can indeed be a soul equivocally, yet is not truly called a soul, but is a certain vital efficiency which by abuse is named a soul. On which account God, who has affixed to each several thing the justice of His law, gave for the uses of men the natures of irrational creatures, as not standing far from a sprouting or seminal life, so that those who feed upon their flesh might have them in the place of vegetables. For 'you shall eat all flesh as the green herbs.'
For they seem to have but a little more, through the vegetation of the senses, than the things by which they are nourished and from which they receive their growth. Let this fact instruct the lovers of flesh not to fasten their soul to many sensible things, but rather to be occupied with spiritual privileges, since in these the effects of the soul are truly beheld. For in carnal things the irrational creatures are our equals and peers. But somehow the consequence of the discourse has been bent into another direction:
for this was not the thing set forth for contemplation—to inquire what is more excellent in man, whether the operation of the mind or the material substance—but that the mind, while interwoven in some part of the things that are in us, equally in all and through all diffuses itself, and is neither contained from without nor contained within. For this 'being contained' is properly perceived in jars or buckets and other like vessels and bodies, which contain by their own capacity that which they hold:
but the communion of the mind with the body is known to have a certain ineffable and incomprehensible bond—neither existing within, since an incorporeal thing cannot be contained by a body, nor surrounding or encompassing it from without, but joined and connected by an invisible and unsearchable principle of nature; it is beheld in it and around it, in that manner (as I have said) in which it can neither be understood at all nor uttered, save that, as long as that same nature retains its proper order, the mind too exercises its operations. But if nature wavers through some fault, the motion of the mind too must necessarily totter. CHAPTER XVII.
An exposition of the divine word in which it is said, 'Let us make man to our image and likeness,' wherein is investigated what the reason is, and in what respect this passible and mortal nature of ours is like to the blessed and impassible nature; and how in the image male is approved and female, although in the primeval form they seem in no wise to exist. But let us take up again the oracle of the divine voice: 'Let us make man to our image and likeness.' How small and unworthy a thing some of the outsiders have surmised concerning the magnificence of man, who thought to exalt him by comparison with this world! For they said that man is a little world, consisting of these same universal elements.
But indeed those who with such boasting have conferred a name of this kind upon human substance have utterly forgotten themselves, while out of the properties of a mouse and a gnat they have feigned inept praises of man. For in those creatures too nature is compacted out of four elements, and around all living things some portion, more or less, of these elements is discerned, without which the things that use the senses could in no wise subsist. What then is great, if man be thought to be set forth as the figure or likeness of the world—of the heaven that passes away, of the earth that is changed, and of all the things contained in them, perishing by a like condition along with the transit of their containers?
But wherein lies the greatness of man according to the ecclesiastical reasoning? Not in that he was created after the likeness of the world, but in that he was made to the image of the Creator. Perhaps you will ask what is the reason of the image—how the corporeal can be like the incorporeal, how the temporal can be like the eternal, how that which is changed by continual motions can be like the immutable, that which is subject to passion and corruption like the impassible and incorruptible, and that which is ever engaged in malice and defect like Him who is without any malice. For there is a great distance between the primeval form and that which is made to its likeness. For the image, if it preserves the likeness of the principal form, is truly and properly called an image.
But if it departs from the imitation of it, it is shown to be something else. How then shall mortal man be proved to be the image of that most pure and immortal nature, ever-subsisting? Concerning these things, therefore, Truth itself alone clearly recognizes the true reason. But we, as far as we are able to grasp, diligently investigating the truth itself by certain conjectures and surmises, judge this to be the thing that is sought—concerning which neither does the divine discourse deceive us, which referred to man as made to the image of God, nor is the misery of human nature to be bewailed, since it bears the likeness of that blessed and impassible life.
But it is necessary to confess one of two things: that if anyone should compare to God what is ours, he must think either the divine substance passible or the human impassible—as though, by these equalizings, a likeness of reason in the substance were discerned in both. But if the Divinity is not in passion, nor are we proved exempt from passions, what other reason, do you suppose, is left, according to which we may say that divine word to be truthful which has testified that man is the image of God? Therefore let us take up the same Scripture in its entirety, to see whether through it some declaration may shine forth to us for what is sought. After it had said:
'Let us make man,' and indicated for what purpose he was made, adding that 'God made him to the image; to the image of God He made him; male and female He made them.' Now it has already been said above that this sentence proceeded unto the overthrow of the heretics' impiety, by which we are fittingly instructed that the only-begotten God made man to the image of God, so that by no reasoning may we attempt to distinguish the divinity of the Father and the Son, since divine Scripture equally confesses both to be God—both Him who made man, and Him to whose image he was made. But concerning these things let the assertion now be omitted.
Let us turn, however, to the proposed question: how the divine nature is indeed blessed, and yet Scripture records as wretched that which is like to it. Let us therefore explore the very words more diligently, and we shall find that one thing is what was made to the image of God, and another what is now beheld in misery. 'God made man,' it says; 'to the image of God He made him'—here is finished the constitution of him who was made to the image of God. Then there is appended, as it were, a discourse concerning the same constitution, when it is said: 'Male and female He made them.' But I think it is most well-known to all that this very thing is understood to be alien from that primeval form.
For in Christ Jesus, as the Apostle says, there is neither male nor female; but because by these the divine word divided man, a certain twofold formation of our nature is proved—both that which reflects the divine likeness, and that which is shown to differ from it. For the attestation of the account intimates something of this kind, first saying that 'God made man; to the image of God He made him,' and then subjoining that 'male and female He made them.' This latter, however, is proved to be foreign among the things that are understood of God; but I judge that through these words spoken by Holy Scripture a great and sublime doctrine is declared, which I perceive to be of this kind:
that human substance is intermediate between two things separated from one another at their extremes—namely, between the divine and incorporeal nature, and the irrational and brutish nature. For the reason of both is beheld in the constitution of man: the divine, in that he is rational and intellectual, which also shuns the distinction of male and female; the irrational, in that he bears a corporeal constitution divided into male and female (for in both of these are engaged all the things by which human substance is contained); but that what is intellectual in us is set above the thing which we see serving human propagation, we have learned by the very order of the creation that follows.
For unto the effect of generation there is a certain conjunction of man with the irrational creatures, grafted in. First, then, it says that 'God made man, to the image of God He made him'—showing by this what we said above the Apostle defined, that 'in Christ Jesus there is neither male nor female.' Then it brought in what would express the properties of human nature: 'male and female He made them.' Nor let anyone blame me as though I seem to derive the understanding of the proposed reasoning from on high; for God, naturally existing as whatever good we embrace in thought—nay rather more excellent than every good that can be either understood or comprehended—created man for no other cause than because He is good.
Being therefore such, and on that account having stood forth as the creator of the forming nature, He in no wise displayed an imperfect power of His goodness, as though He gave something of the things at His command, yet withheld something through the compulsion of envy; but the form of perfect goodness is in this, that He brought forth into being man who was not, and made him a partaker of good things. But since there is proved to be a great heaping-together of those very goods, which could not easily be comprehended by number, therefore Scripture, embracing all things together by a certain general expression, took care to signify them when it referred to man as made to the image of God. For this is equivalent, as if it said that human nature was made a partaker of every good:
for if the fullness of goodness is the Divinity, and man is the image of this, then assuredly this image too is in the fullness of every good, possessing the likeness according to the primeval form. There is therefore in us the constitution of every good, and of all virtue and wisdom, and whatever else can be understood as best; but above all, that we are free from all necessity, not subjugated by any natural power, but by our own choice incline toward the counsel that has pleased us. For virtue is a spontaneous thing, and subject to the dominion of none. But that which is forced by some necessity cannot any longer be virtue.
Since therefore in almost all respects the image displays the beauty and form of the primeval form, unless it differed in some respect, it would no longer be a likeness, but would be shown to be the very thing and equal to it in all respects—which is proved to be immutable in all things. In what, then, do we perceive the distance between the Divinity and its likeness? In this, without doubt, that the Divinity is uncreated, whereas this subsists by creation—which difference of property has in turn brought forth a consequence of other properties. For an undoubted profession occurs to all, that the uncreated nature is immutable and ever remains in the same manner, but the creature cannot persist without change.
For the very transit from nothing to existence was a certain motion and conversion, when the non-existent is transmuted into being by the divine counsel. And just as the holy Gospel calls the figure impressed on the coin the 'image of Caesar'—whereby we learn that according to the figure there is a likeness of Caesar, while in the underlying subject his difference appears—so also in the aforesaid matters the figures, by analogy, are those things which are beheld in the contemplation of the divine and human nature; in those things in which there is the same likeness, we find a difference wholly in the subject, which by the gaze of the mind we behold as uncreated and created nature.
Since therefore the Divinity itself ever is, but man through creation began to exist out of change, and seems to have a certain kinship with the changeable nature—therefore He who knows all things before they come to be, as the prophet had promised, foreseeing and looking ahead by the power of His foreknowledge to what the motion of human choice would incline according to its spontaneous will, beheld that which was to be, bestowing upon the image the difference of male and female, which would no longer look to the divine and principal form, but, as has been said, would seem to draw near to the irrational nature. But the cause of so great an Artificer only those indeed understand who behold the truth with their own eyes and are ministers of the Word;
but we, as far as is possible, pursuing the traces of truth by certain conjectures and tokens, set forth what has come into our mind, not in an assertive manner, but by way of exercise we impart it to devout hearers. What then is it that we have been able to think out concerning these things? When divine Scripture says that 'God made man,' by an indefinite signification it shows the whole race of men. For Adam is not here named in the constitution, as the narrative also declares in what follows; but the name belongs to the man created, generally, not to any particular man. Hence, then, from this general appellation of nature, we are compelled to think out something of this kind: that the divine power and foreknowledge embraced all human nature in the first constitution.
For one must reckon that nothing among the things created by God is indefinite, but that for each of the things that are there is a most certain mode, bounded by the wisdom of the Creator. For just as any particular man here is bounded by the quantity of his body, and the measure of his substance is its quality, which is unfolded together with the surface of the body—so I judge that, as it were in some single body, the whole fullness of humanity was embraced by the Author of the universe through the power of foreknowledge; and that Scripture intimates this when it says: 'And God made man; to the image of God He made him.'
For this image is not in a part of nature, nor is this grace bounded in some one individual who is beheld in his own singularity; but this power of so great a virtue runs out actually into the whole race. And a sign of this is that the mind is equally implanted in all; and it is established that the faculty of thinking and reconsidering is present in all—the other things by which the likeness to the divine nature is declared being included in this, that he is recognized as made to the image of God. For whether it be he who was formed in the first constitution of the world, or he who shall be in the future after the consummation of the whole world, each is alike proved to bear in himself the divine image.
On this account one man is called the universe, because to the divine power nothing is past nor future, but even that which is awaited it beholds, as though it were present, by the power whereby it contains all. The whole nature, therefore, running through from the first to the last, is one certain image of the substance; but the difference in male and female was afterwards wrought in the formation, on account of this cause, as I judge. CHAPTER XVIII. What ought to be answered to those who, doubting, inquire whether the procreation of children be sin. But it is better, I think, before the proposition be ventilated, to inquire into the resolution of the question which is brought forward by our rivals.
For they say that before sin there was neither birth, nor groaning, nor the appetite that attends the propagation of offspring; but that, after they had been driven from paradise following the transgression, and the woman had been condemned to the punishment of childbearing, then Adam came together with her so as to know his wife by right, and thus the beginning of procreation was effected.
If, then, there were no nuptials in paradise, nor groaning there, nor birth, they say it is necessary to reckon from the consequences that men would by no means be multiplied, unless immortality had fallen back into this mortality, and they would preserve nature by their wedded union, restoring by a continual succession those who are born of them in place of the dead—so that sin would seem in a certain useful manner to have been introduced for men. But the human race would have remained in those two who were first formed, since nature would be moved to succession by no fear of death. But in these matters, again, the true reasoning, whatever it is, is known only to those who, according to Paul, are proved to have been instructed by the ineffable words of the happy paradise;
But our affirmation is shown to be of this kind. When the Sadducees once resisted the truth of the resurrection, and put forward, to confirm their perverse doctrine, that woman of many marriages who had had seven brothers, and thereupon inquired whose wife of them she would be after the resurrection, the Lord answered, instructing not the Sadducees alone but laying open to all the mysteries of the life to come after the resurrection: 'In the resurrection,' He says, 'they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; for neither can they die any more, for they are equal to the angels, and are the sons of God, since they are the sons of the resurrection.' Now the grace of the resurrection promises us nothing else than that we should be restored to our ancient state out of our fallings.
For a certain return to the former life is the grace we await, which again happily leads back thither the man who was driven out of paradise. If therefore the converse of those restored shall be joined to the angels in fellowship and number, it is clear that man before the fall was reckoned as a kind of angel. Therefore also, when our life has recovered its former state, it will without doubt be made equal to the angels. But although, as has been said, there are no marriages among them, nevertheless they exist in countless thousands of hosts of angels, as the prophet Daniel intimates in his visions.
Therefore, in like manner, if no excess of sin had drawn us away from that angelic dignity, neither would marriages have been proved necessary to us for the multiplication of the race. But whatever that mode of nature is by which the angels are multiplied—a mode most perfect indeed, though it cannot be devised by human conjectures—nevertheless that mode, whatever it truly is, would have shown the effect of its operation also in those who were made but little less than the angels, multiplying the human race by the will of the Creator up to the predestined number.
But if perchance someone press us hard, inquiring into the very mode by which souls could have come to be, had man not sought the work of marriage, let us also ask him what is the mode of the angelic constitution, how they are held to subsist in countless thousands and yet in one essence, being established surely from a very great number. To this we more fittingly reply to him who proposes how man could continue without marriage, saying: in that mode by which the angels are known to be without marriage. For that man before his transgression was like to them, the renewal again manifests by his likeness to them.
These things therefore being laid open in this manner, let our discourse return to the question proposed, namely why, after the condition of the image, God deigned to devise by His own firm decree the difference of male and female. For to this end I confess that this foregoing consideration which we have set forth is useful. For He who produced all things that they might be, and who fashioned the whole man by His own disposition to the divine image, by no means suffered by small and slight additions that the number of souls should seem less perfect in its fulness.
But at once He conferred the entire fulness of human nature by the effect of His foreknowledge, adorning it also with a most sublime and not unlike-to-the-angels end; for because by His almighty providence He knew that the choice of the human will would not be moved rightly, and that on this account it would withdraw from that angelic converse—lest through this the multitude of human souls should be diminished, falling away from that mode by which the angels were multiplied—therefore He framed for the falling into sin a providence of multiplication suitable to our nature and worthy of those who fall into sin, in place of the angelic sublimity grafting into human substance the mode of beasts and of irrational creatures, by which they succeed one another as they pass away.
Hence it seems to me that the great David also, compassionating human misery, bewails its nature in such words, that man, while he was in honour, understood not—calling 'honour' the fact that he had been like the holy angels; therefore was he compared to the senseless beasts and made like unto them. For truly he was made like a beast, who took up in his nature this animal mode of generation, on account of the fall of conversion which befell him from the conformation of matter. CHAPTER 19. That the irrational passions in us are shown to have their occasions from the kinship of that very nature. For I think that from this beginning, all the vices also, as though flowing forth from a certain fountain, gush out in the pitiable conduct of man.
This present assertion is confirmed by this argument, that a certain kinship of passions appears to be common to us and to the irrational creatures. For it is not lawful to ascribe to human nature (in respect of that whereby it was fashioned to the divine likeness) the beginnings of passible affection; but because the life of irrational living things preceded into this world, and for the aforesaid causes man too had something from the same fashioning, according to the adornment of begetting, therefore he was made a partaker also of the rest of the effects which are beheld in nature. For man is not like to God in respect of rage, nor is that supereminent nature figured by passible pleasure;
fear too, and boldness, the appetite for more and the hatred of diminution, and the like of these, stand far off from that figure by which Divinity is expressed. These therefore the human substance contracted from its irrational part. For those things by which the life of brutes is fortified for its own preservation, when transferred to man's preservation, became the beginnings of the passions. For by rage are preserved the beasts that feed on flesh; whatever creatures are lustful multiply their kind by propagation; flight guards the weak, and fear protects him who is more easily caught by the stronger; gluttony too preserves the corpulent; and if it happen that one does not attain what pleasure seeks, it becomes the occasion of irrational grief.
All these, and whatever else is of this kind, there is no doubt have come upon the generation of men from the animal and brutish constitution. But let it be granted me to describe in words the human form according to a certain figuration of a wondrous thing. For just as we see images made from fashioned things, statues which turn the minds of beholders to astonishment—those who are proved to be of this art carve in such a way that sometimes they make a single two-formed head—so a certain twofold and contrary likeness of man seems to exist: by the mind indeed, whereby he is worthy of God, formed to the divine beauty; but by the passions, by whose onset he is buffeted, joined by a certain property to the brute animals;
and frequently the motion becomes almost brutish, whenever he is utterly inclined to irrational motions, obscuring that which is better in himself by the affection of the worse. For as soon as one bends the efficacy of the mind to the corruption of passion, and compels his counsels to serve it, then a certain depravation of the good formation is displayed, and so all nature is changed into wickedness, when now reason wholly cultivates the principles of the passions, and for the increase of iniquity multiplies the very thoughts as causes of the vices. For the mind, exhibiting its co-operation to the passions, has procreated a manifold and dense abundance of evils. Thus the lust of pleasure had indeed its beginning from the likeness of irrational nature, but in
the excesses of men it grew vehemently, begetting such great differences of the things produced—differences which come from the will itself—as you could not find among the irrational creatures. Thus the commotion of rage is indeed kindred to an irrational thing, but it grows by the accession of thought. For hence is the memory of malice, hence envy, hence falsehood, treacheries too and dissemblings are shown to come from here. But all these proceed from the cultivation of an iniquitous mind. For if the onset of passion be exalted by no support of thought, it quickly grows weary, and vehement rage is proved feeble, and as soon as it has arisen is extinguished.
Thus the greedy voracity of swine furnished the occasions of avarice; thus the prancing of the horse became the beginning of pride; and all the things which are the proofs of irrational causes, through the mind's evil use, were made the beginnings of rational mortals' vices. So, on the contrary, when thought reins in and restrains these onsets, they are forthwith transferred into the appearance of virtue. For from rage indeed descends fortitude, from dread caution; fear begets submission, and hatred stirs up the turning-away from malignity; the virtue of love too procures the desire of the true good; exaltation likewise plucks our characters out from the passions, and preserves free prudence from the slavery of baseness.
The blessed Apostle too commends the appearance of this subtlety, when he repeatedly commands us to be wise about the things that are above. And so you will find that every such motion, which lifts the mind on high, is conformed to the beauty of the divine image. But because there is a certain heavy and downward-tending quality of sins which prevails over the better part, and the ruling power of the soul is depressed rather by the weight of irrational nature, since this heavy and earthly thing is elevated by the sublimity of the mind, therefore it often comes to pass that our misery is ignorant of the divine gifts, drawing over the most beautiful image the most foul face of passion.
And therefore those who behold these things are right in not easily consenting that the divine form is present in such persons, but rather to discern the divine image in men through those who shine forth by the conduct of an upright life. For if every vicious person or one given to the flesh does not allow it to be believed of man that he is adorned with divine beauty, yet he who is perfect in virtue and most pure from every contagion confirms that opinion which subsists concerning the better part of man—so that (for what is said is better proved by example) just as the touch of malignity diminishes some comeliness of nature, he above all does so who is proved to be most notorious in sins, as was Jechoniah, or any other who is recorded to be conspicuous in wickedness.
But in Moses and those like him the beauty of the image is beheld perfect. In whomsoever therefore the comeliness is defiled by no obscurity, in these the faith of the things that are said shines forth evidently, in that man exists as an imitator of the divine goodness. But perhaps someone blushes that, taking the food of irrational life, a likeness binds us together, and therefore deems it unworthy of man who was made to the image of God; but let immunity from this function also be hoped for our nature in that life which is to come, to be granted at some time. For it is not, as the Apostle says:
The kingdom of God is not food and drink; and the Lord testified that man lives not by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God; and also testified to the glory of the resurrection, when He approves that our life is to be made equal to the angels. But among the angels there is no food. Wholly fitting therefore is the faith that this function will be free for man, who was made to the likeness of the angels. CHAPTER 20. A mystical interpretation of that which is said: of every tree that was in paradise man was permitted to eat. But perhaps someone may say that man does not return again into the same kind of life, since at first we lived by eating. Yet I, hearing Holy Scripture, know not bodily food, nor only the gladness which is from the flesh.
But I altogether acknowledge yet another food, which bears a certain likeness of proportion to this food of the body, whose pleasure too and sweetness passes only to the soul. Whence also Wisdom exhorts the hungry and says: 'Eat of my bread'; and the Lord declares blessed those who hunger for such foods. And 'if anyone thirst,' He says, 'let him come to me and drink.' The great Isaiah too says: 'Drink gladness,' commanding those who could hear his magnificence. And there is also a certain prophetic threat against those who are worthy of such vengeance, that they should be punished as it were by famine. But the famine is not a lack of bread or water, but a failing of the word. 'Not a famine,' he says, 'of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the word of God';
of that planting therefore which was made by God in Eden. But pleasure (which is what Edom is interpreted to mean) compels us to devise a certain worthy fruit, by which without doubt the human substance was nourished; nor indeed is it fitting to perceive in the converse of paradise this pleasure which passes away and flows off. 'Of every tree,' He says, 'that is in paradise thou shalt eat.' Who will give him, who wholesomely hungers, that tree which is in paradise, which embraces utterly every good, whose name is 'every,' the participation of which the law granted to man? For by a general and supereminent word this whole species of goods is known to itself, and this whole is one thing;
but who shall remove me from the taste of that tree which is mixed and inclining to either side? For it is by no means held uncertain among those whom the grace of contemplation illumines, what is the 'every tree' whose fruit is life, and again what is this promiscuous and confused thing by whose touch death is begotten. For He who granted with copious bounty every delight, by a certain reason and providence assuredly forbade man from the partaking of common things. And it seems to me right not to take the most magnificent David and the most wise Solomon as deserters of this law. For both of them professed the living grace of this food. For that which truly is, the good, is wholly every good. David indeed says:
'Delight or take pleasure in the Lord.' And Solomon names wisdom itself, which is the Lord, the tree of life. Therefore the tree of life is the very same as that 'every tree,' all whose food the divine law granted to him who was created according to God. But on the contrary, from this tree another tree is separated off, whose food is the knowledge of good and evil, fructifying not each apart according to the signification of contrariety, but bringing forth a certain confused fruit, mixed and grown together with itself by a contrary quality; from the partaking of which the Author of life indeed forbids us. But the serpent persuades that it be eaten, that thereby he may contrive the entrance of death;
and by the very persuasion he prevailed, imparting deadly counsel and sprinkling that same fruit with a certain deceptive colour of pleasures, so that it appeared most sweet and kindled the appetite of taste. CHAPTER 21. What the life in paradise was, and what manner of thing is that tree which was forbidden. What therefore is that which contains the knowledge of good and evil, and through the pleasure of the senses seems to be most pleasing? Do you think that by conjectures pursued with zeal I depart not far from the truth, employing the understanding of knowledge, by the support of this contemplation?
For I think that this knowledge in the present cannot be understood as the discipline of those who have their senses exercised, but I find a certain difference: the custom of the divine Scriptures with regard to knowledge and discretion. For according to discipline, to discern good from evil the Apostle says belongs to the more perfect habit, of those who have their senses exercised. Therefore also he taught us to prove all things, and said it is the property of the spiritual man that he can judge and discern all things. But knowledge does not everywhere insinuate discipline and acquaintance according to its signification always, but it is spoken in a good sense according to the effect of grace, as is that: 'The Lord knoweth those who are His.' And God says to Moses:
'I know thee above all'; and concerning those who are blamed in their evils, He who knows all things testifies and says: 'I never knew you.' Therefore that tree which fructifies mixed and confused knowledge is of those things which are forbidden us by the Lord. For that fruit appears to be joined to contrary qualities, which also is proved to have the serpent as its proponent: according perhaps to this reason, that evil is not set forth naked and uncovered, so that it could be beheld through itself according to its own nature; otherwise malice itself would have remained ineffective, coloured by no semblance of good, through which he who is deceived can be drawn into desire of it.
But now the nature of evil is in some way mixed, containing destruction in its depth, as it were placing certain open snares. But in that seduction which is not apparent, it presents before itself a certain image of good; for the colour of gold, that is, of matter, seems good to the avaricious and covetous, but the root of all evils is avarice. And who would rush into the mire of most foul and most filthy lust, unless he reckoned pleasure to be something good and acceptable, allured by a certain enticement to the disease of passion? So too the rest of sins have an utterly mixed difference, which at first sight are thought most acceptable, and by the deceit of seduction are sought as goods by the inconsiderate and imprudent.
Because therefore most people think that to be good which gladdens the sense, and there is a certain kinship of name—whether of the good which truly exists, or of that which is thought good and is not—for this cause Holy Scripture calls that concupiscence which draws to evil as though to good the 'knowledge of evil and of good': while this knowledge declares a certain affection, neither absolutely evil, because it is coloured with the surface of good, nor most sincerely good, because the destruction of evil lurks in it, but promiscuous, that is, perplexed from both, it testifies to be the fruit of the forbidden tree, whose taste it said draws those who touch it to death.
Almost proclaiming this by an evident doctrine and voice, that what is truly good is simple and single, alien from the nature of all things; but evil is various and painted over, which is thought to be one thing, but by very experience is proved to be another, whose knowledge—that is, the effect of operation—is the cause of death and the beginning of corruption. And therefore the serpent, foreshowing the most wicked fruit of sin, did not evidently display evil as it stands in its nature (for man would by no means be seduced by open malice), but illuminating by a certain appearance that which was visible, and insinuating pleasure through the senses and presenting it to taste, persuaded the woman to transgression, as Scripture says:
'And the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and pleasant to the eyes to behold, and fair to handle; and she took of its fruit and ate.' But that food became the mother of death to men. There is not therefore a mixed fructification. For the discourse manifestly laid open the understanding, how that tree was seen to be called the knowledge of good and evil. Just as poison smeared round with honey: according to that whereby the sprinkled-in sweetness soothes the sense, it is believed to be good; but according to that whereby it cuts off and corrupts those who take it, it is made worse than every evil.
As therefore the deadly poisons prevailed against the life of man, then man—a great thing, a great name, and the figuration of the divine nature—was cast down, like vanity, as the prophet says. Therefore the image of God is properly discerned in those things which are understood to be best in us; but whatever things seem pitiable and sad in our life are proved to be utterly alien from the divine likeness. CHAPTER 22. That the resurrection ought to be maintained not so much from the preaching of the Scriptures as from the very necessity of things. But malice is not so strong as to prevail over the divine power, nor is the inconstancy of our nature better or more persevering than the wisdom of God.
For it is not possible that this mutable and convertible thing should exist more tenaciously and more firmly than that very thing which abides perpetually and endures in good without any change. The divine counsel therefore is always utterly immutable, but the mutability of our substance retains firmness not even in evil. For that which is always moved—if indeed its advance tends toward the good—because of the infinite thing which it attains by progressing, its progression into what lies before will never be terminated, since it will not be able to find any limit of that which it seeks, by the grasping of which its motion must at some time come to a stand.
But if its intention bend to the contrary, when it has run through the course of wickedness and arrived at the topmost summit of evil, then the impulse of the ever-moving thing, finding no rest of its own nature, when it has run through the determined spaces of malice, will necessarily turn its motion now to whatsoever things are best. For since malice is by no means moved indeterminately, but is enclosed by necessary bounds, consequently the limit of evil will be the succession of good; and so, as has been said, our nature, which is ever in motion, by a certain return runs thereafter the path of good, having been instructed by the memory of the evils with which it was afflicted, lest it fall away again to the like.
Again therefore our course will be in good things, because, as I have said, the nature of malice is proved to be prescribed by necessary bounds. And just as those who dispute about sublime matters say, the whole world is filled with light in the upper parts of the world, but darkness is generated from the shadow of the earthly body and from its obstruction (and this indeed according to the figure of the body gathered into the manner of a sphere, and the rays of the sun behind its back being shut out come on in the likeness of a cone);
but the sun, being of a magnitude much greater than the earth, surrounds it on every side with its rays in a circuit, sending forth the emissions of light beyond the boundary of the cone; so that if it be granted to anyone, by a certain power, to pass beyond that measure to which the shadow extends, he will assuredly be ever in the light, with no darkness meeting him. So I think it ought to be devised concerning us also: that having gone forth from the bounds of malice—so that we had been placed in the highest darkness of sins—we should again be turned in the light, after ages comprehended by no bounds, the substance of good things over-excelling, as it were, the measure of the shadow. Again therefore paradise, again all that tree which is also the good of life, again the grace of the image and the dignity of headship.
Nor does it seem to me that the hope is promised back to us of these things which are now given by God to men for the necessary uses of life, but a hope of some other thing, whose account is proved to be ineffable. But let us pursue the consequence of the things we are discussing. CHAPTER 23. Against those who say: If the resurrection of the dead is good and best, why was it not done long ago, but is held back through certain circuits of times? For perhaps someone, kindled in thought by the sweetness of so great a hope, thinks it a heavy burden and a great loss that he does not more quickly arrive at those good things which transcend human sense and knowledge, bearing with annoyance the interval of time, which by the delay of itself prolongs the things desired.
But let him not be straitened like a little child, impatiently awaiting a brief little delay of pleasure. For since all things are dispensed by reason and wisdom, it is necessary that whatever things come to be are contained not without reason and wisdom. You say therefore to me: What is this reason, by which it is not granted immediately to attain that which is desired—to come from this most troublesome life—but, predefined by fixed times, this grievous and temporal mode of life awaits the limit of the whole consummation, so that then human life, as though loosed from certain bars, may again run, quiet and free, to the blessed and impassible state of the contemplation to come? But to these things.
Whether the reasoning approaches the truth concerning these things which are sought out, the truth itself evidently knows; but that which comes under our understanding is of this kind. For I say, taking up again the first discourse in which God said: 'Let us make man to our image and likeness'; the image of God indeed has attained the measure of perfection perfect in all human nature. But Adam was not yet formed; the earthly condition, according to a certain expression of its own name, is called 'Adam,' as those assert who are skilled in the Hebrew tongue. Therefore the Apostle too, sufficiently instructed in his native speech, that is, of the Israelites, names man 'of the earth, earthy,' as it were transferring the word 'Adam' into the Greek sound.
Universal man therefore was made to the image, if his nature is most like to God; and he was made by the almighty wisdom not as a part of the whole, but as the fulness of all nature at once. And He saw that it contains all the bounds, as Scripture commemorates, that 'in His hand are all the bounds of the earth'; He saw, who knew all things before they came to be, embracing all things by divine knowledge, how great the humanity would be in each individual according to number. And because He likewise saw that the figment had its endeavours more prone to evil, and that, of its own accord flowing down from the angelic dignity, it would be most humbly knit to common nature, therefore He mingled something of the irrational creatures with His own image.
For in that divine and most blessed nature there is no difference of male and female, but He transferred to man a certain property of the irrational, as I have said, of formation, by no means establishing the multiplication of our generation according to that most sublime creation. (For it was not when He made man to the image of God) that He then commanded men to grow and multiply, but when He made the difference of male and female, then He said: 'Increase and multiply, and fill the earth'—which is not of the divine nature, but proper to the irrational, as the text of the history shows, which signifies that this was first uttered here by God concerning the irrational creatures.
But if He had first made the difference of male in us and of female, and through that word by which it was said 'Increase' had conferred on man the power of multiplication, we would by no means need this kind of generation, through which the irrational creatures are contemplated. Since therefore God by the power of His foreknowledge foresaw beforehand that the fulness of men would come into being for life through animal procreation, He who dispenses all things in order and reason established for man this kind of generation as necessary—a kind which would be more proclive to the humility of our nature, which He saw before it came to be, who beholds future things as present.
Therefore for the creation of men He also predisposed beforehand the measure of time, so that according to the sojourn of the predestined souls in this world the duration of time too should be stretched out together, and then at length the flowing motion of time itself should at some time come to a stand, when the human race could no longer arise in it. The generation of men therefore being consummated, time likewise will also fail, and so the restitution of all things shall come to pass, in which by a universal transformation the human race will be changed, passing from a corruptible and earthly state to one impassible and eternal—which it seems to me the holy Apostle too foretold to the Corinthians, the sudden cessation of time and, on the contrary, the dissolution of mutable things, in which he says:
Behold, I tell you a mystery: we shall all indeed rise again, but we shall not all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet.
For when the fullness of human nature, as I judge, shall have come to its appointed limits according to the measure foreknown by God, so that nothing further is lacking for the increase of the number of souls, he taught that in a moment of time the change of the things that are will take place, naming as 「a moment」 and 「the twinkling of an eye」 that indivisible point of time which is its limit without any interval, so that it is by no means possible for any greater swiftness to be added at the last and uttermost instant, on account of which a large part should be left over at the extremity to possess this completed change in death; but as soon as the trumpet of the resurrection shall have sounded—the trumpet that will then awaken the dead—and when those who are found alive shall be changed after the likeness of those who rise from the dead, they shall come together to incorruption, so that they may no longer be pressed down by bodily weight, nor be held back by any earthly mass, but be borne aloft on high into the air.
For we shall be caught up, says the Apostle, in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air; and so we shall ever be with the Lord. Therefore we await that time, which is now of necessity extended by the increase of mankind. For Abraham too, and the patriarchs who were with him, had indeed the desire to see the good things of the Lord, yet they were not able to attain the heavenly fatherland they sought, as the same Apostle says; but at that time they were still established in the grace of hope, God providing some better thing for us, according to the words of the same blessed Paul, that they should not be made perfect without us.
If therefore those men bore this delay with equanimity, who, beholding from afar by hope and faith alone the good things of the Lord and saluting them, as the Apostle testifies, placed the sure gladness of the things to be hoped for in this one thing only—that they trusted the faithful Promiser—how much more should we esteem these many, to whom perhaps not even a hope of a better life can be supplied from the quality of their living? The soul of the prophet also failed for longing, who through his psalmody confesses the greatness of his love and says: My soul longs and faints for the courts of the Lord; and if it should befall him to be cast among the lowest, he requests this, as though it were something greater and more excellent, to be the last in those courts than to be first in the tents of sinners.
Nevertheless he was most patient of delay, counting that mode of life blessed and preferring even a brief share of it to thousands of days of the present time. For better, he says, is one day in your courts above thousands. Yet he did not bear with extreme distress the necessary dispensation of the things that are done. And it is established as a thing suited to the blessedness of men, that they should not cease to hope for good things; therefore the same prophet places at the end of that very psalm and says: O Lord God of hosts, blessed is the man who hopes in you. It is not fitting, then, to confine within a narrow breast a scanty care for the things that are to come; but rather, lest we fall away from the promises, we ought to expend our zeal.
For just as, if someone should forewarn me, inexperienced and untaught, that in the summer season there comes a rich gathering of fruits, and the barns will indeed be filled with crops, and the table will be heaped with the very abundance of plenty in most plentiful dishes, he will surely seem a vain man if he hastens to anticipate the coming of the season, who ought first of all to scatter the seeds and by that very diligence to prepare the fruits for himself, willing or unwilling. For the time, as it was fixed beforehand, will come, which those will not receive in like manner who provide for themselves an abundance of crops, and those who shall have been caught at that very hour empty of all preparation:
so also for us, I judge, it is expedient—since it has been made plain to all by the divine preaching which is now carried on that the future time of our change is at hand—not to scrutinize the times that are to come, since Scripture says it is not for us to know the times or the seasons, nor to search out any speculations by which the soul, weakened, should grow weary from the hope of the resurrection. But if there is in us any belief of the things that are promised, we ought, cleaving to the pursuits of the best manner of life, to await with equanimity that future and venerable antiquity of grace itself. CHAPTER XXIV. That whoever confesses the beginning of the world's establishment must of necessity concede also concerning its end.
But if anyone, beholding the course of this present world moving by a certain law of its own—by which the span of time slips away—should by no means say that the cessation of moving things which has been foretold can come to pass, it is manifest that he does not confess that in the beginning heaven and earth were made by God. For whoever believes in a beginning of motion in no way doubts about its end; but whoever does not admit an end, it follows that it received no beginning either. But just as we understand by faith that the ages were framed by the Word of God, as the Apostle says, so that out of things invisible the visible things came to be, by the same faith we shall reason concerning the Word of God, who foretold that there would be a necessary transformation of the things that are. But in what manner this happens, it is the part of an over-curious man to inquire.
For there too we perceive by faith in things invisible that the things which are seen are perfect, passing by the searching out of incomprehensible matters; nay rather, since the discourse admonishes us to be ignorant of many things, it has granted no small satisfaction concerning the ambiguity of things to be believed. For it would be permitted to the contentious by certain argumentations there too to overthrow faith consequently, lest the discourse which holy Scripture pronounces be thought true concerning the material condition, affirming that all things that are, are from God. But those who strive by the contrary reasoning say that matter is co-eternal with God, fashioning their dogma by such arguments:
If God is of a simple nature, then surely he is without matter and without quantity, and without mass, and without composition, existing as a stranger to the prescription of any figure. But all matter is discerned in the extension of spaces, by no means escaping the apprehension of the senses, being recognized in color and figure, in mass too and quality and impression or hardness, and the rest of like things—of which nothing can at all be found in the divine nature. What contrivance, then, is it, that from that which is prescribed by no interval there should proceed a nature which is contained by intervals?
For if these things are believed to exist from thence, it is certain that they must be thought to inhere in him, and, according to an ineffable manner, to have come thus into the order of generation. But if matter is in him, how is he himself not material, who contains matter in himself? And likewise too with all the things by which material nature is figured: if therefore quantity is on this account believed to be, how is God without quantity? If he is in that which is composite, how is he himself simple and without composition? Whence it is necessary either that he be material, because the very reasoning compels matter to subsist from him; or, if anyone shrinks from this, he will nonetheless reckon that matter was introduced from without for the constitution of all things.
If therefore it was something extraneous, it will be established that there existed something besides the Lord, which would be understood, according to the principle of perpetuity, to have subsisted together with the Unbegotten, so that the reasoning gathers two principles alike unbegotten—namely, of him who works the more skillfully, and of that which receives this disciplined form of his working. But if anyone, as though compelled by necessity, should suppose the matter of all created things to be everlasting, what favor and defense of his dogmas will the Manichaean then find, who strives to make the material cause equal to the unbegottenness of the good nature according to its unbegotten state?
But we, hearing that all things are from God, hold fast to it, since Scripture says so; and how they are from God, since it is above our understanding, we by no means curiously search out, believing the divine nature to be the creatrix of all things—since it both established that which reason determined, and would, by a marvelous transformation, bring the thing already established into whatever quantity it willed. Consequently, therefore, we reckon...
...that the things which are, can by the will of the divine power be brought into being toward that establishment which is not yet—if we, referring also the consummation of things to his power, in nothing assume the reasoning of our own discipline on account of that which we believe ourselves to say; although we might, by a certain invention of words, persuade those who dispute with contentions about matter, so that they would not dare easily to oppose our discourse thereafter. On the nature of heaven, that it is not composed of the four elements according to Aristotle. (The following chapter does not belong to this book, but crept in here from the book On the Elements, perhaps by reason of similarity of argument, in which place it is the fourth chapter.)
But Aristotle introduces a fifth body, the ethereal, I mean, which is borne in a circuit, being unwilling that heaven should have been generated from the four elements; and he says that this fifth body is borne in a circuit because it moves by a circular revolution—which Plato plainly argues consists of fire and earth, speaking thus: It is necessary that what is of corporeal kind, both visible and tangible, should be; but without fire nothing will ever become visible, nor anything tangible without something solid, and the solid by no means exists apart from earth. Accordingly, beginning the body of this universe from fire and earth, God made it; but two things cannot well consist without a third, for there is need of a bond joining both together;
but the best bond is that which makes both itself and the things bound together as much as possible one; and this proportion is most fittingly suited to accomplish—he calls the bond the two middle elements taken from such a proportion. But those who cultivate the doctrine of the Hebrews differ concerning heaven and earth; for these, indeed nearly all of them, say that heaven and earth were generated from no preceding matter, because Moses says: In the beginning God made heaven and earth. But Apollinarius holds that God made heaven and earth from the abyss; yet Moses, in his account of the generation of heaven, makes no mention of the abyss as having been generated. But in Job it is said that he made the abyss; from this, therefore, he reckons that all other things were generated;
yet he does not hold it to be unbegotten, but that it was produced before all bodies, and was presupposed by the Creator for the subsistence and manifestation of other things. Whence the abyss of matter (hyle)—but in whatever way this stands, it makes no difference. For thus too the God who is Creator of all is shown to have made all things from things that are not. But against those who maintain that there is one single element only—earth, fire, air, or water—what was said by Hippocrates will suffice. For if there were but one only, a man would never feel pain, for there would be nothing by which he could feel pain if one alone existed; and if he did feel pain, whence would come that which should heal? But the sick man must be changed together with sensation. But if there were one single element only, there would not exist that into which it might be changed;
and not being changed, but remaining in itself, it would by no means feel pain, even if it were capable of sensation; but that which suffers must of necessity suffer from something. If therefore there were but one element, besides the quality of that element there would be no other from which a living thing might suffer; and if it could neither be changed nor suffer, in what way would it feel pain? Showing therefore that this is impossible, he draws his conclusion from what is admitted: But if it did feel pain, whence would come that which should heal? Now, however, it is not one thing that heals, but many; least of all, therefore, is a man constituted of one element. Moreover, from the very things by which each one tries to fortify his own dogma, it is most of all shown that the elements are four;
for indeed Thales, calling water alone the element, strives to demonstrate that the other three are generated from it, for he says its sediment becomes earth which is finer-grained (leptomeresteron), air, and what is thinner than air, fire. But Anaximenes, positing air alone, also attempts to show that the other elements are produced from air. Heraclitus likewise, and Hipparchus of Pontus, bringing forward fire, use the same demonstrations. Since therefore both these say that fire is generative of the other elements, and that one likewise air, and the other water, it is plainly evident that all the elements are mutually transformed and turned into one another, and that any one of them follows of necessity to be an element.
For whichever of the four elements you take away, this too will be found to be made from another. CHAPTER XXV. Against those who dare to assert that matter is co-eternal with God. For the opinion is not borne out which, from the things found by way of consequence concerning matter, pronounces that this too, springing from the intellectual, exists without matter. For we find that all matter subsists by certain qualities, of which if it be deprived, it can by no reasoning be apprehended. But each species of quality is divided by an underlying principle. But the principle is intellectual, and there is no corporeal inspection of it:
as, for example, suppose there is set before us in our contemplation some animal, or wood, or anything else which subsists by a material constitution, we weigh many things concerning that same subject by a discrimination of thought, each of which things, that are inspected together, are contained without any commingling, by reason and order. For the principle of color is one thing, and that of weight, of quantity, another. Likewise the principle of quality is one, and that of touch nonetheless another; for softness and the two-foot length and the rest of the things that have been mentioned agree with one another by no principle of likeness, nor with the body. For to each one a certain proper interpreting principle has been adjoined, communicating with none of those qualities which are discerned in its subject.
If therefore color is intelligible, and figure also intelligible, as too is quantity and the rest of such properties; but if you take away each of these from the subject, the whole principle of the body is likewise dissolved—it follows that, since we know the absence of these to be the cause of the body's dissolution, we ought to esteem their meeting and concurrence to perfect the material nature. For just as the body is not color, or figure, or distance, or weight, or the rest of the properties—to whatever it they belong—since, with respect to each of these, as we have said, they cannot be a body, but are shown to be something else besides body according to their own property:
so on the contrary, wherever the aforesaid things concur, they perfect a corporeal substance. And indeed, if the inspection of these is proved to be intellectual, and the divine nature is intellectual, there is nothing incongruous in that these occasions for corporeal generation can subsist from the incorporeal intelligible nature—since the intellectual nature indeed makes intelligible powers, and the concurrence of these into one another consequently brings forth material nature and generation. But these things have been discussed in passing. We, however, must again refer the whole argument to faith, by which we have learned that all things were established out of things non-existent, and again that they are to be changed into a certain other state, being taught by the venerable Scriptures, we by no means doubt.
CHAPTER XXVI. In what manner one may be led, even by those who are without, to believe the Scripture teaching concerning the resurrection. But perhaps someone, beholding bodies already dissolved, and weighing the divine reason according to the measure of his own powers, may declare the dissolution impossible, and pronounce that it cannot be that the things which are moved should stand, nay rather that the things which are now not moved should rise. But whoever he is, let him first receive the chief and greatest argument concerning the truth of the resurrection—that its preacher is proved most worthy of all faith, and that the faith of the things which are said retains its firmness from those things which have been foretold and fulfilled.
But since the authority of the divine Scripture has committed to us many and diverse discourses, I think it easy to explore, from those things which are now fulfilled, whether the things that have been said are false or true, and through them to inspect this dogma also of the resurrection. For if in other matters the discourses are shown to be false and far from the truth, this one too is not known to be free from falsehood. But if all the rest are true, with experience itself bearing witness, it follows that through these the preaching of the resurrection truly exists. Wherefore let us call to mind one or two of the things that have been foretold, and at the same time set forth their outcome, so far as we may be able to recognize whether our discourse answers to the truth.
Who then is ignorant how of old the Israelite people flourished, exalting themselves above almost all the powers of the world—what their kingdoms were in the city of Jerusalem, what their walls or towers, what too the great magnificence of the temple, so that it seemed even to the disciples of Christ a marvel, and they besought the Lord himself to give heed to it? And so they were affected with the amazement of admiration at the things they beheld, as the history of the holy Gospel declares, saying: What works, and what manner of buildings were these! But the Lord intimates to those who at the present were exceedingly admiring it the future desolation of the place and the destruction of that beauty, saying that nothing of the things which were seen would remain after a little while.
But also at the time of his passion, when many women followed him bewailing and lamenting that he had been condemned by an unjust sentence (for they could not yet understand the dispensation of the things that were being done), he gave them counsel, that they should cease from the things they wept over concerning him, because these were not worthy of tears, but should defer their lamentations and mournings to that time in which they would express true ones—when their city should be pressed by besiegers, and they should come into such straits of distress and calamity that they would then call blessed the one who had not been born at that time. Among which things also he foretold that crime by which they would devour their own children for hunger, saying in these words that in those days the barren woman who bore not would be happy.
Where then is that kingdom, where the temple, where the loftiness of walls and towers, where that power of the Israelites? Are they not indeed seen to be scattered, one here, another there, through nearly all lands, and with their subversion is the kingdom too destroyed? But it seems to me that the Lord foretold these and like things not for the sake of the things themselves (for what gain would the foreknowledge of the things that were to come bring to the hearers, things which, even if they had not known them beforehand, they would have learned by experience itself?), but that through these there might now consequently be held a faith concerning the greatest matters. For the testimony which stands in these works is proved to be in those others also a demonstration of the truth.
Just as, if some farmer, relating the power of seeds to an inexperienced man, should be by no means believed by him, it suffices him, for the proof of the truth, to demonstrate in one grain of seed the power of them all, so that concerning the rest his assertion may be firmly proved; for whoever has seen one grain—of wheat, say, or barley, or any of the others that happen to be of a medicinal measure—after it has been deposited in the bowels of the earth, rise up into an ear, can no longer doubt from this one concerning the rest: so to me, concerning the mystery of the resurrection, the very truth foretold and fulfilled by deeds seems a fitting testimony, or rather the experience of the resurrection itself already, which we have perceived, instructed not so much by words as by deeds.
For since the miracle concerning the resurrection was something great and beyond belief, the Lord, beginning from a lower sign of his power, gradually accustoms our faith to higher things by certain stages. For just as a certain mother, suitably nursing her little child, for a while pours milk into it through her breasts for its tender mouth, but when it begins to put forth teeth, offers it bread—not, as it is, hard or stiff, lest its solidity there roughen the softness of the gums, but, chewing it with her own teeth, softens it and prepares food suited to the strength of the little one; then, according to the advancement of its age, prepares stronger foods for one accustomed to softer ones:
so the Lord, nourishing human littleness as though imperfect infancy with such great miracles, and governing it through the very sickness which lay despaired of in its bed, forms in it the power of the resurrection—a thing which, for its consummation, was indeed pitiable, but not such that it should be believed impossible to come to pass. For commanding the fever which was strongly burning Simon's mother-in-law, he so on the instant removed so great a cause of the malady, that without delay she rose up and was able to render service to those present, she who was looked for forthwith to die. After this, adding a little of his power, he healed the ruler's son, who was languishing under manifest peril. For thus the evangelical history relates: For he was beginning to die, the father crying out and saying:
Come down, Lord, before the boy dies; and likewise working the miracle of the resurrection of him who was believed to be about to die, accomplishing it with a more excellent power, so that he neither came to the place, but, watching from afar, transmitted life to the boy by the power of his command; then, instructing us consequently, he leads us on to the higher things of his virtues. For coming of his own accord to the ruler's daughter, he afforded occasions of the journey, that both the healing of her who labored under an issue of blood might be made known, and that by so great a delay of time death might prevail over the sick girl—but now, the soul being separated from the body, and amid the troubled and mournful cries of those who were extolling the calamity with lamentations, he, as though from sleep, by an imperative word raised the girl to life.
By a certain way and consequence raising human frailty toward greater things, and again transcending these miracles too with his accustomed power by a loftier might, he makes a way for men whereby they might admit the faith of the resurrection. Holy Scripture records that there is a certain city named Nain in Judea. In it was the only son of a certain widow, a boy—not such a boy as would be reckoned among little ones, but one who had now from boyhood already advanced into youth. Whence the heavenly word calls him a young man, intimating much in few words. The very account is a great lamentation: There was, it says, a widow, the mother of the deceased. You perceive the weight of the calamity, how briefly it set forth the suffering. For what is it that is said?
That there was no longer any hope by which she could be restored with children, and assume so great a solace for her bereavement. For she was a widow, and had no other whom she might behold in place of the deceased. For her childbearing had been single. But how great this evil is, all easily understand who know the laws of nature. Him alone she had known in her travails, him alone she had suckled at her breasts, he alone made her feast bright; and of all her grief he alone was the cause of gladness, when he played or did anything, when he was being instructed or adorned, when he was joined with his coevals in processions, in wrestling-schools, in assemblies—whatever was sweet and precious before a mother's eyes, he, the only one, the sole, presented.
And now the time of marriage had arrived; he seemed the stock of the family, the little branch of the succession, the staff of old age and the increase of her years. There was yet another occasion for lamentation. For he who recounted the young man at the same time indicated the flower that had withered—whose face was still clothed with down, and the comeliness of whose cheeks shone with a pleasing radiance. What then did the mother bear over his death; with how great a fire were her bowels burned? How copious and most bitter the tears she shed over him? Wasting away in a manner and embracing his corpse, that his burial might not be hastened, and desiring to be satisfied with so great a calamity, she longed to send forth long voices in weeping at length, so that she moved all who heard to mourning.
Nor did the holy account pass this over. Seeing her, it says, the Lord was moved with compassion, and approaching he touched the bier; and those who bore it stood still; and he said to the dead man: Young man, I say to you, Arise—and forthwith he restored him living to his mother, now not after a small delay and distance, although not yet buried, yet near to burial; life from the Lord, resurrection of the dead—indeed a greater miracle, but altogether an equal command. But still more magnificently are the signs of his powers brought forth, that one may more and more approach that matter wherein the resurrection of the dead seems to be doubted.
One of the intimates of Christ, named Lazarus, falls sick, whom the Lord, although a friend, on that account delayed to visit, and kept far from the sick man, so that, life being absent, death might find entry and through the infirmity might accomplish what was its own. He indicates to the disciples what had befallen Lazarus in Galilee, and that he must hasten thither to raise him from the dead. But they, on account of the savagery of the Jews, shunned the places mentioned, deeming it deadly and perilous to go again into Judea, and to be among murderers and the impious; and therefore, lingering and deferring, they prolonged the time, lest they should return thither.
The Lord's command prevailed, and as he set out the disciples followed, that in Bethany they might behold the first-fruits, as it were, of the universal resurrection. It was now the fourth day since the burial, and all things seemed to have been paid over to the tomb; it was established that the body, deposited in the monument, and, as was consequent, now distended with the dread of corruption, was being dissolved by the destruction of decay. For the putrid matter flowed down into the earth by very necessity, a thing assuredly to be fled, and, nature compelling, that which had been dissolved exhaled a most foul stench. But this happened so that the work of the general resurrection, which is too little believed by the faithless, might be proved by the demonstration of a manifest miracle.
For it is not someone lifted up out of sickness, nor one placed in extremity retained in life, nor a little girl lately dead raised up, nor a youth near the monument deserting his own bier, but a man of the first rank, putrefying and flowing apart, so that it was not even tolerable to his sisters that the Lord should draw near the monument, on account of the implanted offensiveness of the corpse now dissolved: yet by one voice he was made alive, and gives faith to the preacher, which confirms the hope of the resurrection. This is what we believe in common concerning all, which we have learned in particular by experience itself.
For just as, at the universal resurrection, the Apostle says that the Lord himself descends from heaven with a command and with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, to raise the dead to incorruptibility, so now too, dispelling death like a kind of sleep by the command of the dominical voice, he who was in the monument, and shutting far away from himself the corruption that had come from death, leaps forth whole and perfect from the sepulcher, not at all hindered from walking even by the very bands with which he had been bound. Do you esteem these things small for making faith that we believe the resurrection of the dead is to be? Or do you seek that this opinion be confirmed to you from other things also? It seems to me not in vain that the Lord said to those who were of Capernaum, as though in their person:
Surely you will say to me this parable: 'Physician, heal yourself.' For it was fitting that the miracle of resurrection which He had wrought in the bodies of others He should also approve, manifested in His very self, according to that whereby He deigned to be man, confirming His preaching by His own death as well, in many trustworthy ways. You have seen a girl but lately ceasing to live, a young man too drawing near the tomb, and likewise Lazarus all but dissolved; all alike were summoned back to life by a single spoken command. You seek also those who have come to death through blood and wounds, lest perhaps in this some failing be found, whereby the grace of the Giver of life should not appear in all things.
Behold the hands of the Lord pierced through with nails; behold the side bored through with the spear-point; pass your fingers over the openings of the nails; put your hand into the wound that was made by the lance. You may perhaps reckon how far the sharpness of the point could penetrate to the inner parts from the breadth of its scar; you may, if you please, measure the entry, for the very wound, made by the thrust of a man's hand, shows clearly how deep it descended. If therefore, thus afflicted, He rose from the dead, opportunely do we bring forth that saying of the Apostle: 'How do some say among you that there is no resurrection of the dead?'
Since therefore every pronouncement of the Lord is shown to be true by the very testimony of the facts—for this we have learned not by word only, but by the very deed we glory to have received a manifest hope of His promise through those who have already come to life from the resurrection—what occasion will any longer remain to the unbelieving? Shall we not, renouncing those who through philosophy and vain deceit strive to despise the simplicity of faith, hold fast in our littleness the purest confession of our hope, saying after the manner of the prophet of that same grace, when he says to the Lord: 'Thou shalt take away their spirit, and they shall fail, and shall return to their dust';
'send forth Thy Spirit, and they shall be created, and Thou shalt renew the face of the earth'—when also he affirms that the Lord shall rejoice in His works, 'when sinners shall fail from the earth.' For how shall anyone any longer be called a sinner, when sins can no longer exist? CHAPTER XXVII. That the resurrection of the dead is not contrary to what is fitting. But there are certain men who, from the deficiency of human reasonings, judging the divine power by our own measure, affirm that what they themselves cannot grasp is not possible even to God.
For they point out to us the remains of the ancient dead utterly consumed, both those which fire has reduced to ashes, and beyond this they are shown to bring forward to this argument the beasts that feed on flesh, and the fish that draws into its own body the flesh of a man perishing in shipwreck, and this in turn becomes a man's food and through digestion is converted into the bulk of the one who eats; and many other things exceedingly absurd and wholly unworthy of the power and magnificence of the great God they allege for the overthrow of the true doctrine—as though God could not, by these same things, restore again from their consumption that which is proper to man.
But let us in brief cut short the lengthy excursions of their most vain reasoning, confessing that the dissolutions of the body take place into those things of which it consists; and that not only does earth, according to the authority of the divine word, return to earth, but that air also and moisture are restored each to its own most like portion, and that each of the things that are in us migrates back to its own origin.
And although the human body be given as food to birds that feed on flesh, and to beasts that feed on flesh, and be mingled by these chances; although it come under the teeth of fishes, and through fire be turned into vapours and dust—wheresoever, according to the proposed reasoning, one carry the man about, it must needs be that he is within this world, which the voice divinely inspired teaches to be held in the hand of God, when it says that 'in His hand are all the ends of the earth.' But if you cannot be ignorant of what you hold in your own palm, do you suppose that the knowledge of God, which is superior to your power, fails to search out, of those things which are held by the divine power and hand, even that which is certain to it? CHAPTER XXVIII.
That it is possible, when human bodies have been dissolved into all the elements, that out of what is common to each its own be again restored and made whole. But perhaps, looking to the elements of the whole world, you think it difficult that our condition, drawn back into the kindred element of air—the warm too and the moist, and the earthy of our substance, likewise mingled with their own proper parts—can again be restored from the common store to each that which is its own. Accordingly, you do not consider, even by human examples, that this too cannot transcend the bounds of the divine power.
You have doubtless somewhere, in the dwelling-places of men, seen a common flock pasturing together in common; yet when again the flock is divided among its proper owners, either the habit of the places, or the marks set upon the cattle, restores to each its own. Pondering some such thing concerning yourself, you will by no means stray from what is fitting. In short, since by a natural bond and affection the soul is held about the body which it inhabited, there is in it a certain latent commixture, a certain affection and acquaintance which they now have toward one another, as though by certain marks set by nature, by which their fellowship, remaining unconfused, is distinguished by the properties of each.
When therefore the soul shall have drawn back again to itself its kindred and proper thing, what labour, I pray—nature in particular not forbidding—is it for the divine power that its own should again come together into itself, and by a certain ineffable concurrence of nature each part strive toward its own? But that even after the dissolution certain marks of our conformation remain to the souls, is shown by that discourse which took place among those below, when, the bodies having already been given over to burial, there clung to the souls a certain bodily recognition, by which both Lazarus could be known and the rich man could not be unrecognized.
Nothing therefore is beyond reason, if it be believed that bodies, in rising again, return with what is proper to each out of the common store; and this he most especially observes who has taken pains to investigate nature more diligently. For not in all respects do the things that are ours flow and change; otherwise they would be utterly incomprehensible, having no stability by nature. But when the matter is more carefully examined, it appears that of the things which are in us, something stands, while something else flows away by change. For the body is changed through increases and decreases, putting on, as it were, certain garments through certain successive ages;
yet through all these changes the form stands unchangeably, not deserting in itself the marks which were once impressed upon it by nature, by which it retains its recognition through all the body's changes. But there must be withdrawn from this reasoning that alteration which is joined to the form on some occasion; for the form takes on, as it were, an alien person of foulness, which it bears through the troubles of sickness; and when this is by some means removed—as in Naaman the Syrian, or in those whom the Gospels record—the form that lay hidden under the affliction returns again into its own recognition by recovery of health.
Therefore, according to that whereby it is like to God, the soul flows and is changed by no alteration, but remains fixed, ever existing as the selfsame; and according to this our re-formation maintains the divine likeness. And since the differences of the form are wrought by the qualities of the temperaments which change, while the temperament is nothing other than the disposition of the elements—and let us call elements those things which are subject to the whole creation, of which we profess that the human body also subsists—necessarily the form, as though stamped by a seal, remains in the soul, and it in no way is ignorant of the very shape which it received by impression.
Whence at the time of the resurrection it receives back again into itself those things which were suited to the form itself; and those things are suited which from the beginning are proved to have been implanted in the form. Therefore nothing appears beyond reason, that out of the common store there should again return to each that which is its own. It is said also of quicksilver—which the common people call living silver—that if it be poured out over sloping and dusty places, it is divided over the ground into the tiniest globules, and these cannot mingle though running together; yet if anyone again gather into one that which was scattered in many ways, the spring joins itself to its own kind, entangled by no interpositions to hinder its commixture. Some such thing I judge ought to be observed also concerning the composition of man.
For as soon as the faculty has been granted by God, the like parts will of their own accord mingle with their proper parts, without any difficulty to Him who deigns to re-form nature. For even in those things which spring up from the earth we behold no labour to nature, when it converts wheat, or millet, or any other seed of grain or pulse, into stalk, ears, and spikes, without difficulty; for the suitable nourishment of its own accord passes from the common store to the property of each seed.
If therefore moisture is set forth in common to all the seeds in the earth, and each is nourished by it, and draws to its own growth that which is fitting to it, what new thing is it if in our restoration this too take place, when from each thing that rises again that which is its own is drawn, as happens in seeds? Therefore from all things it is possible to learn that the preaching of the resurrection is nothing beyond those things which are known to us by experience itself. And indeed, of those things which are ours, I had almost passed over in silence that which is best known—I mean the very beginning of our formation. For who is ignorant of the marvel of nature, and what the maternal womb receives, and what it brings to perfection?
You see how simple in a manner and how slight is that which is deposited in the inward parts for the occasion of the constituting of our body; but the variety of the perfected substance—who could unfold it in speech? And who, recognizing such a work to be of common nature, would not deem possible that which is wrought? But if that small thing, which is reckoned almost as nothing, is known to be the beginning of so great a matter—and I call it great not only with regard to the formation of the body, but I declare that the soul itself first is altogether worthy of admiration, and the things which are discerned concerning the mind itself. CHAPTER XXIX.
Against those who say that souls exist before their bodies, or on the contrary that bodies are formed before souls, wherein there is a certain fabulous opinion concerning souls. For I think it beside our purpose to inquire into what is disputed in the churches concerning the constitution of the soul or of the body. For it has seemed good to certain men, who before us, disputing about first principles, brought forth, as it were, a certain pestilence—namely, that souls subsist beforehand in a conversation proper to themselves. And let there be there set forth examples both of malice and of virtue: and the soul that perseveres in good things feels no experience of bodily conjunction; but if it lapse from the participation of the good, then it withdraws to this life, and dwells in a body.
But others, regarding the order handed down by Moses concerning the condition of man, affirm that the soul is in the second place—that is, after the body—in respect of time, since God first, taking clay from the earth, formed man, and so thereafter by inbreathing gave him a soul. And by this reasoning they show the body to be more excellent than the soul which is knit to it, in that it was formed before. For they say that the soul was made for the sake of the body, lest the formation should remain immobile without a spirit. But everything that is made for the sake of another is surely baser than that for the sake of which it is made—as the Gospels declare, since the soul is more than food, and the body more than raiment, because these latter were granted for the sake of the former;
for the soul was not made for the sake of food, nor are bodies established as formed for the sake of garments; but when these existed, the latter were provided as necessary for use. Since therefore the assertion of either opinion is not free from reproach—both of those who suppose that souls live beforehand in a certain state and order of their own, and of those who think them created after the bodies—I deem it necessary to examine to some extent the things which are asserted in their doctrines.
For if we wish to investigate more diligently the arguments of both, and to lay open all the absurdities which are proved to be annexed to their opinions, we have need of a long space of time; and therefore, looking briefly, as far as is possible, at the things said by them, we shall not delay to refute them. Those who lend patronage to the first profession, and assert an earlier conversation of souls for the sake of this life of the body, do not seem to me to be free from the errors of the Gentile doctrines, who feigned many fabulous things concerning the transformation of souls into bodies. And if anyone examine these men diligently, he will find that by very necessity their assertions are brought to this point.
But that someone, who among them was reckoned to be wise, related that he had been both man and woman, and then had flown away into birds; and likewise that the same had at times bloomed as a plant, and at last had obtained his life as moisture—this is not far from the truth, indeed according to the judgment of him who was not ashamed to put forth such things. For truly these doctrines of theirs are proved worthy of the chattering of frogs and crows, and of the irrationality of fishes, and the insensibility of trees, which affirm that one soul passes through so many things. The cause of this absurdity is that they suppose souls to subsist beforehand. For consequently the principle of their doctrine, tending and pressing toward the earlier hour, slides down even to these monstrosities.
For if, on account of some malice, the soul falling from a more sublime state becomes, as they assert, a man—and the bodily conversation is surely more vicious than that intellectual one—every necessity is that the soul, placed in such a life, in which the many occasions of sinning cannot be lacking, should be enticed to greater malices, and be declared more vicious than before. But the viciousness of the human soul is a likeness of an irrational thing, to which, familiarly joined, it in a manner falls back into the nature of beasts of burden. For having once hastened through malice, even when it has been made irrational, it desists, as it were, from the purpose of the greater things. For the standing of evil is the beginning of virtue; but to irrational things there is no virtue.
Therefore by very necessity it will always be changed for the worse, completing itself into that which is more degraded and more abject, and stretching on by continual change to that which is the extreme. And as the rational nature transcends the sensible, so from this there is a descent to the insensible. But their discourse, proceeding thus far, though it be carried beyond the truth, nevertheless by a certain consequence is driven on from absurdities. Hence also, through incongruous and impossible things, there is generated for them a fabulous doctrine, which would consequently demonstrate the utter perishing of the soul.
For that which has once flowed down from the sublime conversation will no longer be able to stand at any measure of malice, but, entangled by the affections of the passions, passes from the rational to the irrational, and from this too is transferred into insensible shrubs. But the insensible and the lifeless are by a certain reasoning near to one another, and the lifeless follows upon that which is not. Thus altogether, by this consequence of theirs, the soul will be dissolved into that which is not, since by necessity passage to better things was impossible for it. But indeed they lead the soul back from the thickets to man; therefore by these things they demonstrate the life that is in the thickets to be a more excellent manner of bodiless conversation.
For it has been shown that the progress of the soul straining toward evil consequently rolls down to feeble things, and that the lifeless nature is lower than the insensible, to which extremity the principle of their doctrine consequently leads the soul. But because they are unwilling for this, either they must confine the soul within sensible things, or, if from this they again lead it back to the human—a better state—it must, as has been said, be shown that the woody life was of that first institution, seeing that thereafter the fall into malice took place; whence afterward there is granted an ascent toward virtue. Therefore this assertion is convicted of being without head and without end, which maintains that souls live beforehand by themselves apart from the life of the flesh, and are bound to bodies on account of malice.
But the inconstancy of those who contend that the soul is younger than the body shall be overthrown by the things which are set forth in what follows. Wherefore the reasoning which is brought forward by both sides must be rejected; and through the middle of the opinions I judge that our doctrine ought to be directed in the truth. And this is it: that neither, after the manner of the Gentile seduction, do we suppose souls to be pressed down by some malice—which souls they declare, because they cannot keep pace, through weakness, with the rotation of the whole pole that is borne with exceeding swiftness, on this account to fall back to the earth; nor again do we say that the soul is lent to man as to one who forms it beforehand, as it were, by some present reasoning;
otherwise the intelligible nature would be shown to be inferior to the clay-made institution. CHAPTER XXX. The assertion that one and the same cause is seen to subsist for both the soul and the body. But since man is one, who consists of soul and body, it behoves to give to him one and common beginning of his institution, lest he seem to himself prior and posterior, so that the condition of the body should stand first in him, and second that of the other. And in respect of the divine power indeed, according to the reasoning a little before set forth, we profess that the whole fulness of the human condition subsists beforehand, the prophet testifying to us in this, who says that the Lord knows all things before they come to be.
But in the conformation of individuals we do not prefer the one to the other, neither the soul before the body, nor the contrary do we say, lest the man, divided according to a difference of time, should fall apart within himself. For since our nature is understood to be twofold, according to the teaching of the Apostle—namely, of the visible man and of the hidden—if indeed one subsist before, and the other supervene after, the power of the Creator would seem imperfect, as not sufficing to both at once, but, the work being divided, occupied separately in the halves of the individuals.
But just as in wheat, or in any other seed whatsoever, we behold the whole species of the ear comprehended by a certain power—that is, the haulm, the joints, the internodes, and likewise the fruit and the awns—and we do not say that any of these subsists beforehand in nature by reason, nor that it comes upon afterward; but that the implanted force is declared in the seed by a certain natural token, and that no other nature is brought in upon it: according to this reasoning we suppose that the cause of the human seed also exists; which, on the first occasion of its constitution, is indeed sown all at once, according to the power of nature, but is stretched out and declared by a certain natural consequence, advancing toward that which is perfect, and assuming nothing from without for the occasion of its perfection.
For it consequently extends itself toward that which is perfect, so that it can be truly affirmed neither that the soul subsists before the body, nor that the body subsists for the sake of the soul; but rather that whichever be the beginning of the other is, according to the higher reasoning, disposed in the first will of God, while according to the other it is established in the occasions of generation. For as the distinction of members cannot be discerned before the formation in that which is cast for the conception of the body, so neither is it possible for the contemplated properties of the soul to be discerned in it before they come forth into the effects of operation;
and just as no one doubts that, in the differences of the members and the inward parts, that which is deposited is shaped not by some other power entering in, but by that which, implanted in nature, brings itself by its own force to this operation, so also concerning the proportion of the soul they reason in like manner concerning the rational element, that although it is not yet recognized through any visible operations, nevertheless nothing of any single thing is perceived to exist in it deficiently.
For just as the species of the future man is in the seed by a certain force and potency, but lies hidden for this reason, that it cannot appear before the necessary consequence allow and permit it, so also the soul is indeed in that seed, although it does not yet appear, but it will appear, making its own and natural effect of operation advance together with the bodily increase. For since the power in conception is wrought not by a dead body, but by a living and breathing one, therefore we say it is in accordance with reason that what is directed by a living thing toward the occasion of life should not be reckoned dead and lifeless. For flesh that is lifeless is surely dead. For death comes about by the privation of the soul.
But no one would say, concerning this, that the privation is older than the possession, if at least anyone should assert that the lifeless, which is dead, is older than the soul. But if anyone require a more evident argument that that portion lives which becomes the beginning of the forming animate being, it is possible, even from other signs by which the animate is distinguished and separated from the dead, to perceive concerning this part. For we take the argument of a vital thing from men, namely that someone is warm, that he is moved, that he operates; but the cold and immobile in bodies is nothing other than mortality itself. Since therefore we have seen that the warm, which also operates, is that of which we speak, hence too we gather arguments that it is not lifeless.
But just as, in respect of the bodily portion, we do not call that flesh and bones or hairs, or whatever we behold in man, but say that these are each by force and potency, not yet however appearing visibly; so also in respect of the portion of the soul, we record that its rational and irascible part, and whatsoever things are considered concerning the soul, do not yet have place in it, but we say that the proportion of the formed body, and likewise the consummation of the effect of the soul, are wrought together, as we advance with the subject.
For thus the perfect man, among the greater operations of the soul, obtains the effect; at the outset of his constitution he displays in himself endeavours fit and suitable to the present use of the soul, so that through the infused matter he may form for himself a most fitting dwelling-place. For we do not believe it possible for the soul to be fitly inserted into alien buildings, just as the seal impressed upon wax cannot be fittingly fitted to a wholly alien carving. And as the body proceeds from the small to that which is perfect, so also the operations of the soul that is knit to it likewise grow together and advance.
It proceeds indeed in its first constitution, like a certain hidden root distributed only to the hollows which are allotted to nourishments and increases (for the smallness of that which takes it in receives no more); then when that which is implanted comes forth to the light and has put forth its germ, then in it the grace of the senses blossoms; and now coalescing and competently running out into magnitudes, the rational power, like a certain fruit, begins to shine forth. For it does not all appear at once, but, carefully growing up together with the perfection of its instrument, ever bearing fruit so much as the potency of the subject is capable of.
But if, in this formation of the body, you perchance inquire after the operations of the soul, attend to yourself, as Moses says, and as in a book, so will you read through, as in a history, the operation of the soul; for nature itself will in a manner recount to you, more effectually than all use of speech, the various occupations of the soul in the body, whether in the soul, or in the universal, or in the particular condition. But concerning ourselves I think it superfluous to treat in discourses, and to narrate the accustomed marvels as it were to certain persons placed far off and beyond the bounds. For who, beholding himself, would have need of words by which to learn the laws of nature?
For it is most easy that anyone, considering the manner of his own life, and how he bears a body opportune for every effect of vital operation, weighing it, should observe with what the primordial—or rather germinal—activity of the soul is occupied. And that which is drawn from the living body is laid down to the working of nature; for even the inward parts of fruits and the sproutings of roots, not yet deprived of the most lively vigour which is implanted in them by nature, when they are committed to the earth, preserve, though a hidden, yet a pure quality; but such force and potency the earth which contains them does not confer, as though the earth were bestowing it from itself extrinsically; otherwise it would make even dead wood to germinate.
But that which is implanted brings itself forth to the light by its own love, after the manner of a nurse, perfecting that which is planted in the root, into the pith and bark and branches: which could not have come about, unless some natural potency had been knit in, which, drawing the kindred and suitable nourishment from the things lying near, produced the shrub or tree or ear of corn or something of such kinds. CHAPTER XXXI. A certain medical contemplation, or rather concerning the construction of bodies, is completed in few words.
But although, by the most certain formation of our body, each person is taught by his very self—learning from those things by which he understands and lives and feels, having his own nature as his instructor—nevertheless it is also proper to learn diligently from the books of the wise, who have investigated these matters more studiously. For some have observed, through what physicians call anatomy (that is, the cutting-open of the several joints and veins), in what arrangement each of the things within us is disposed, and thereby they have contemplated the workings throughout the whole of the body's members, inwardly and outwardly, and have reported them to others, so that a knowledge sufficient for this study of human constitution might more diligently be available.
But if anyone makes inquiry of us concerning these things, the Church will surely furnish him with instruction. For this is the law of the spiritual sheep, as the Lord says, that they should not hear the voice of strangers. Therefore let us bring forward our discourse briefly. We have perceived that three things are to be understood concerning the nature of the body, for the sake of which the several things within us are seen to have been established. For some have been suitably formed for life, some for a good life, and some for the succession of posterity. Whatsoever things, then, are given us of such a kind that without them human life cannot subsist—these we likewise perceive to reside in three distinct parts, that is, in the brain and the heart and the liver;
but those things which, by the bounty of nature, have been bestowed upon man for an increase of goods, for living well, are shown to be the instruments of the senses. For things of this sort do not indeed sustain our life, since even when some of them are wanting—as often happens—man nonetheless still subsists; yet it is impossible that a most pleasant life should be maintained without these functions. The third aim of the division accordingly has regard to the offices of succession.
There are, moreover, certain other things besides these, which, for the continuance of the body, are commonly subject to all the members, bringing forth operations of their own that befit them—such as the belly and the lung: the latter indeed by the breath which it takes and renders back to the heart, blowing through it as a seal; the former by receiving food into the inward parts for the common benefit.
Since, therefore, our formation is thus divided, it must be more diligently considered that the force which pertains to our life is not carried on simply through some single member, but that nature distributes to us, through very many parts, the occasions for our preservation, things necessary to the whole body; so that whatever the same nature has contrived for the safeguard and the beauty of life, these appear to be very many, having altogether a great difference among themselves. But I think it proper first to divide briefly the first principles which are shown to pertain to the constitution of our life;
while the matter of the whole body, which commonly underlies each of the members, must for now be passed over in silence by us, since the discussion concerning the universal nature, in respect to a particular contemplation, seems to have nothing to do with our present purpose. Since, then, all confess that there exists in us a portion of all the elements which are in this world—namely of the hot and the cold, and also of the other pairing, which consists in moisture and dryness—we must by all means treat of each. We perceive, therefore, that there are three powers that administer life, of which one indeed warms the whole world with its own heat; another, made moist by humour, tempers what has been wrought by heat, so that with an even balance the soul
be preserved in the midst, by the contrary quality, so that neither does an abundance of heat dry up the moisture, nor a plenty of moisture extinguish the heat. But the third power, of itself, according to a certain fittingness and modulation, holds together the members which have been made distinct, fitting them with their own bonds, and conferring upon them all of itself a mobile and spontaneous force—which, if it be lacking, the body stands loosened and immovable, deprived of the unbidden vivacity and efficiency of the spirit. And rather is the prior craftsmanship and contrivance of our nature, in the very fashioning of the body, worthy to be gazed upon.
For since everything that is hard does not at all receive sensible operations—as we see in our bones and in shrubs and trees, in which indeed a certain species of life is discerned, in that they are nourished and grow, yet the hardness of the subject admits no sense whatever—on account of this it was necessary that a certain formation, after the manner of soft wax, be supplied for the operation of the senses, which might both be impressed by the forms that meet it, and not be dissolved by excessive moisture. For that which is impressed cannot endure in what is moist, nor in a hardness too rigid (because that which knows not how to yield cannot receive an image by impression).
But there stood a certain mean between these, between the flaccid and the rigid, lest the animal should be bereft of the best motions of the power—I mean the sensible ones. Since, therefore, that which is soft and yielding, unless it be made firm by the co-operation of solid things, is assuredly immovable and undistinguished—like those which they call sea-lungs—therefore nature mingled the strength of bones into the body, which, coupling them mutually by a concordant modulation, bound fast their frameworks and junctures deep within by the bindings of the sinews, and thus mingled into them a measure of sensible vigour, wrapping the surface that should bear the passions with somewhat harder flesh.
Upon this most solid nature of the bones, then, as upon certain pillars sustaining the mass, He laid the burden of the whole body. Nor did He frame the bones everywhere undivided or undistinguished and the same; otherwise the body would have remained immovable and without operation, and if man had been so fashioned, like some tree standing fast in one place, since he would neither advance forward by the alternating motion of the legs, nor would the convenience of his life appear through the service of the hands. But now the instrument of steps and of actions has been fashioned by this provision, so that by the spontaneous spirit which is inserted into the sinews, the unbidden bodily motions might be conferred. Hence the management of the hands, various and manifold,
and most suited to every office whatsoever of the contriving mind; hence the bending of the neck, and the inclination and raising of the head, and a certain efficiency about the chin, also the closing of the eyelids, occurring together with the intellect of the rest. Since, too, the very motion of the members works by the sinews stretching and relaxing—as it were by certain engines driving the impulses—while the power, straining through these by its own force, exercises a spontaneous command, and by the voluntary spirit, according to a certain dispensation of nature, displays its proper effect in each part. It has been made most clear, therefore, that the root and principle of all the motions which are believed to be effected through the sinews is that membrane by which the brain is held compacted with sinews.
We do not think, therefore, that we ought now to inquire more curiously concerning the operation of the members of the animal, since a motion of this sort has been declared to lie in the formation of the brain. And that the greatest vigour for guarding our life is conferred upon us from the brain, is evidently recognized from the contrary accident. For if that membrane has sustained any wound or rupture, death immediately follows. Since indeed nature cannot withstand the suffering, with the wound inflicted, even for a point of time, but, as it were with some foundation undermined, the whole edifice at once falls together with the part—therefore manifest destruction of the whole body follows upon its suffering: that the cause of our proper life resides in this can by no means be denied.
But since, in the case of those who cease to live, nature's innate heat is curtailed, and thus what is dead grows cold, it must needs be that such a cause subsists for us also in heat, which, when it is wanting, death assuredly follows; and therefore by the presence of heat the animal is to be acknowledged to live. And the force and power of this heat we have perceived to be the heart, as it were a certain fountain and principle, out of which, after the manner of pipes, manifold veins diffuse the hot and seething spirit throughout the whole body.
And since it was needful that some nourishment also be ever supplied by nature to the heat—because it is not possible for fire to endure of itself unless it be fed with fitting aliment—therefore rivulets of blood, as from some fountain of the liver, are stirred up by the heat of the spirit, and run everywhere at once throughout the whole body, lest one part be left desolate by another and nature by such a beginning be corrupted. And let this very thing teach the abstinent, who are formed in the equability of that same matter, that a certain greed is a corrupting passion, and that the Divinity alone is without any want; for human poverty stands in need of those things which seem to maintain its substance.
Therefore, to these three powers by which we have said before that the whole body is governed, nature, with matter flowing in from without, dispenses by diverse channels, administering that which befits each. For to the fountain of blood, which is the liver, it has assigned the distribution of food. And whatever by such providence of hers it has ever cast in to the fountains of the liver, this likewise it makes ready to be derived from the liver.
Just as if snow upon the mountains should augment with its moisture the fountains lying below, and press down its own liquor through the deep to the lower veins. But the heart's ventilation is supplied by the operation of a neighbouring member, which indeed is called the lung, and is a receptacle of air through the implanted windpipe which reaches as far as the mouth, drawing the breath in from without; and the heart, set in the midst like a fire, which is engaged in motion and continual operation, is itself moved and operates without ceasing; and, as bellows of smiths do, it draws to itself from the adjacent spirit compressions, filling itself by expansions, and rekindling the fire that is within it by the adjacent arteries; and it does not cease to do this—drawing to itself what is without by a kind of rising-again and re-breathing, while that
which is about itself it inserts by compression into the arteries themselves—which seems to me to be also the cause why this kind of spontaneous breath subsists for us without ceasing. For often the mind is occupied in other things and altogether rests quiet, the body being relaxed into sleep; yet the breath which is drawn from the air cannot rest, not even a little, with the choice of spontaneous will co-operating in this very thing.
For I am of opinion that the heart, wrapped about and surrounded by the lung, moves that member in its hinder part by its respirations and compressions, and contrives for the lung itself the attraction and emission of air; which lung, being most rarefied and full of many cavities, keeps all its openings, as it were, laid open at the bottom and at the top of the windpipe, and being compressed, of necessity expels the spirit that resides within its bounds, but yielding and rarefying, and again drawing in air, is moved through the interval. And this is the cause of this involuntary respiration: that that which is fiery and seething within us cannot be at rest.
For since the proper operation of heat is motion, and we have perceived the principle of this to be in the heart, so that what is continually in agitation in this organ effects, through the office of the lung, the unceasing attraction and emission of air; therefore, if ever heat grows beyond nature, the breath of those who suffer fever becomes more frequent, as though the heart, hastening, were striving to curb the flame set upon it by the continuance of fresh breath.
But since our nature is something most poor, and needy of all things that pertain to its own constitution, it not only suffers a lack of its own air and spirit (for the breath which fosters the inward heat ever flows in from without unto the preservation of the animal), but also providently fits to itself from without the supports of nourishment which may relieve the body's burden; therefore it strives to supply its want by foods and drinks, implanting in bodies a certain appetitive force for that which is lacking, and an expulsive force for that which is superfluous, and thereby furnishing no small co-operation of nature toward fostering the heart's burning.
For since we have reported that the heart is more peculiarly the chief of such members, according to the reason rendered above—namely that it cherishes each thing by the heat of its own spirit—therefore our Former has appointed it most efficient in all respects, so that no part may be approved as idle or empty in the dispensation of the whole body: and behind its back indeed it draws the lung to itself by continual motion, and spreads open its passages for the reception of air, and again pressing it down prepares to breathe out what has been received; while in its forward parts, pressing close upon the belly, it heats it and renders it apt for its proper operations—not rousing it to the resumption of spirit, but impelling it to the reception of the food befitting it.
Very near to each other are joined the entrances of food and of spirit; they are stretched out lengthwise the one toward the other, and are separated by an equal measure at the upper boundary, yet so that they are coupled together and are closed by one mouth of entrance. Whence the entrance of food is effected by the one, and of spirit by the other; but in the deep recesses of the inward parts this conjoined passage by no means continues knit together throughout, for the heart, set in the midst of the boundary of both, grants to the one breath, and to the other its faculty for receiving food; while the fiery nature, fittingly, seeks out matter which it may consume, which it necessarily produces also around the belly, the receiver of foods.
For in so far as it is made fiery by the nearness of heat, in so much the more does it ever demand foods that may nourish the heat. And the desire of this we more fittingly call appetite. But if the belly should receive sufficient matter, not even thus does the operation of the fire rest quiet.
For just as in a smelting-furnace it effects a certain coalescing of the whole matter, and dissolving and intermingling all things, refunds it, as through a certain strainer, to the passages that follow; then, separating the coarser part from the purer, it leads the finer substance through certain channels to the entrances of the liver, but the muddy sediment it delivers to the broader passages of the intestines—which, turning it about in manifold convolutions, it retains the food in the bowels for no short time, lest, driven by a direct course, the food too easily and soon move the animal's appetite for eating, and, after the manner of the irrational creatures, man should never desist from this occupation.
And since the co-operation of heat is proved to be most necessary to the liver, that the moisture might be turned into blood, while this member is separated from the heart by no very small interval according to its position (for I do not think it would have been possible that one principle and root of the vital power should be straitened by the nearness of another principle)—yet, lest anything in the dispensation of the body should be marred by the distance of the hot substance, a sinewy channel, which those skilled about this matter call the artery, receiving from the heart the seething spirit, conducts it to the liver, and there, annexed near the entrance by which the moist things are received, and heating that same moist substance, inserts into it something of igneous vigour by continued heat.
Hence the appearance of blood is suffused with a ruddy heat; and thence two connected rivulets, in the manner of pipes, each receive their own—the one indeed spirit, the other blood—whereby the moist substance, by the motion of heat, may run forth with an easy gliding. And when the whole body has been refreshed, it is disseminated manifoldly into many beginnings of rivulets, which are cut through the whole body; and the two principles of the vital powers, intermingled together—whether that which diffuses heat, or that which diffuses moisture throughout the body everywhere—administer, as it were a certain necessary tribute of their own, and that which holds the chief place principally in the vital yoke.
But this force is beheld to reside in the membranes of the brain, from which the motion of all the joints, the gathering-together, and the vigour of the whole unbidden spirit, sprinkled into the several members, shows our earthen statue to be efficacious and self-moving by some contrivance. For that of heat which is most pure, and that of moisture which is most fine, by a certain mingling and tempering of both powers united together, nourish and re-warm the brain through vapours, from which again a thinned exhalation passes on to the members toward that which is purer; for those things are contained in the brain which also from the higher parts
reach down into the depth in the manner of a pipe, and, extending itself altogether through the joints that follow it and the marrow inserted into it, ends at the extremity of the whole spine of the back; and then, presiding over the bones and sinews, and likewise over the principles of the frames and the marrows, as it were some charioteer, it bestows upon each the power and impulse toward standing still or moving. Therefore it seems to me also to have received a surer fortification. For in the head indeed it is shown to be surrounded by double bones, but in the knots, or in the eminences of the ribs, and by the manifold, hardly shaped interlacings, it is moreover preserved in all stability by that same guardianship by which is held that which, holding the third place, is contained therein.
But likewise will one conjecture this also concerning the heart, that just as a certain spine, solidified into a fixed mass, so the heart is fortified round about by the defences of the bones. For in its hinder part it is fenced on both sides by the spine of the back and the shoulder-blades; and on both sides it is bound by the chain of the ribs, which, encompassing its middle, defends it from all suffering; while in its forward part the breast and the soft-hanging junction of the neck impart to it on all sides a fortification against those things which from without can inflict molestation.
And just as we observe in agriculture, when either the rains from the heavens or the streams of rivulets moisten that which is subject to them—and let some origin, for the sake of our comparison, be supposed, which nourishes a thousand diversities of trees and the manifold species of those things which the earth produces, of which both the form and the quality and the property of colour is shown to be in great difference in each one: since, therefore, there are things which one moisture nourishes in one field—as, for example, that force which moistens each several thing—
it nourishes—being one, as I said, and simple in its own nature—yet the property of those very things which are nourished from it is turned into diverse species and qualities: this same thing grows bitter in wormwood, and is changed into the deadly juice of hemlock, and in another it does another thing—in balsam, in saffron, in the poppy. For of these one is hot, another cold, another possesses a certain middle quality. In the laurel also, and in the mastic-tree, and the like, it is fragrant.
But in figs and pears it renders sweetness; likewise through the vine the grape-cluster, and from it wine flows down, and the juice of the apple, and the redness of the rose, and the whiteness of the lily, and the blue of the violet, and the dyes of the hyacinth and the purple tinctures, and all whatsoever we behold to arise from the earth out of one and the same moisture, are turned into so many differences according to form and species and quality.
Something of this kind too has been wonderfully perfected by nature in this our animate field—or rather by the Lord, the Former of our nature—namely bones, cartilage, veins, arteries, sinews, junctures, flesh, skin, fat, muscles, hairs, nails, eyes, nostrils, ears, and all the other thousand things separated one from another by diverse properties: one species of nourishment, according to the likeness of its own nature, the nutriments, so that, as it approaches the several subjects, the food is also changed according to whatever member it draws near to, imparting its own woven-in force of vigour. For if it has come to the places of the eyes, it is tempered to their use, and is divided about the tunics of the pupils and the eyelids.
If it has flowed into the hearing, it is mingled to the nature of the ears according to its quality, and coming to the lip it becomes lip, and is compacted in the bone, and softens in the marrow, and is armed in the sinews, and is stretched out on the surface of the skin, and passes to the nails, and accomplishes the most subtle springing-forth of the hairs through most fitting exhalations; which, if indeed they emerge through tortuous passages, generate curled and reflexed hairs; but if the progression of the vapours has been made through straight channels, the hairs are born produced and straight.
But our discourse has been led far away from its purpose, while we pursue the works of nature more deeply, having attempted to describe in what manner and out of what things the several parts consist for us—whether those which pertain to the good life, or also whatever other things we have perceived to be, together with these, according to the first order of our division. For our purpose was to show that this seed-like matter of our constitution is neither an incorporeal soul nor a lifeless body, but that, from living and animate bodies, a living and animate thing is laid down in the first formation; which, when human nature receives it, it contains, as it were a certain nourishment, by the fosterings and nutriments proper to it. And this is fittingly led back according to either part, and receives the increments of each.
Soon, through this skilful and orderly formation, it shows the woven-in effect of the soul, at first appearing more obscurely, then shining forth with the perfection of the instrument—just as we perceive in sculptors of stones, where it has been determined to pre-form the appearance of some living thing in the stone. And he who has proposed this first indeed cuts off the stone from its kindred matter, then cutting away its superfluities, by the change of the first shaping he adumbrates that which he has proposed, so that even one unskilled may, through that which appears, without difficulty conjecture the intention of the craftsman.
Again, unfolding it more fully, he draws quite near to the likeness of that whose pursuit he is set upon; then thereafter, in the very matter diligently and entirely demonstrating the species, he leads the art to its end; and it is a lion, or a man, or something else, which was to be made by the craftsman, which a little before was shapeless stone—not that the matter is blotted out by the species, but that the species is proved to be impressed upon the matter through the art. In this manner, whoever thinks also concerning the soul will by no means deviate from the path of reason; for nature, working over all things more artfully, and taking to itself matter of the same kind, has formed a living statue out of a portion of man.
For just as the species followed upon the working of the stone—at first indeed more obscure, but afterwards more perfect when the work itself was finished—so also in the sculpting of this instrument the species is declared, imperfect in the imperfect by the proportion of the subject, and in the perfect subsisting whole and perfect. But in the beginning it was perfect, had not nature been vitiated by malice. And therefore the communion which has accrued to us toward the passible and animal generation does not, in our constitution, forthwith cause the divine image to shine out, but by a certain way of consequence, through the material properties of the soul, man is led to perfection and consummation.
A doctrine of this kind the blessed Apostle also intimates in the Epistle to the Corinthians, saying: When I was a little child, I spoke as a little child, I was wise as a little child, I thought as a little child; but when I became a man, I did away with the things that were of a little child—not that anything else enters in within the perfect man besides that which was understood in the little child, so that the childish mind is done away and a manly one is nonetheless introduced; but the same self is in the one indeed imperfect, and in the other displays the effect of its own perfection;
for just as we confess that whatsoever things are born and grow do live, while all things that partake of life and are quickened by natural motion no one would say to be in any wise lifeless—yet we do not say that such a life as this is partaker of the perfect soul; in the same way, in shrubs a certain vital operation, carried even unto motion, could not attain to sensible motion; and likewise, through growth, a certain power coming to the irrational creatures did not itself attain to the perfection of reason, and does not at all receive the grace of intellect: therefore we define the true and perfect soul of man to be that which is recognized to be vigorous through all its effects.
But if anything else shares in life, we profess it to be animate by a certain customary abuse of language — not because a perfect soul is present in it, but because certain parts of an animal operation exist within it, which (as we learn) have come to us also through a kind of fellowship in passibility, according to the mystical account of Moses the lawgiver, which he set forth concerning the generation of man. And therefore the blessed Paul, offering counsel to those who were able to hear him, urges them to lay hold of perfection, and he supplies the manner by which his aim may be attained, saying: 'Putting off the old man with his deeds, and putting on the new, who is renewed unto the knowledge according to the image of him that created him.'
But let us return once more to the divine grace by which God created man in the beginning — He who said: 'Let us make man to our image and likeness,' to whom be glory unto the ages of ages. Amen. Here ends the book of the holy Gregory, bishop of Nyssa, On the Image, containing the sequel to those things which were left by his brother, the blessed Basil, in the Hexaemeron.