📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Canon Law & Easter Computus

Dionysius Exiguus

Canon Law & Easter Computus 9

Latin original · 301 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss

← ch. 8ch. 10 →
9:1
CAPUT PRIMUM. Particularis quædam ratiocinatio de mundo, natura- lisque disputatio et clarior expositio de his quæ prius in hominis formatione pacta monstrantur. Hic liber, ait Scriptura, generationis cæli ct terræ quando perfecta sunt omnia quae videntur, et ad pro­ prium situm singula discreta cesserunt, quando vo­ lubile hoc corpus coeli cuncta constituit, medium vero locum totius creaturæ gravia corpora et deor­ sum vergentia sortita sunt, terra scilicet atque aqua sese mutuo continentia. Yinculum autem quoddam atque armamentum eorum quae facta sunt divina æternaque potentia est, exstantium naturis inserta, quæ geminis effectibus universa moderatur.
CHAPTER ONE. A particular reasoning concerning the world, and a natural disputation and clearer exposition of those things which were earlier shown to be agreed upon in the formation of man. This is the book, says the Scripture, of the generation of heaven and earth, when all the things that are seen were perfected, and each thing, distinguished, withdrew to its proper place; when this revolving body of heaven established all things, while the heavy bodies, those that incline downward, obtained the middle place of the whole creation—namely earth and water, mutually containing each other. But a certain bond and support of the things that were made is the divine and eternal power, inserted into the natures of existing things, which governs the universe by twin effects.
第一章。關於宇宙的一種特定的論述,以及一篇自然界的辯析與更清晰的闡釋,論及那些先前在人之受造中所顯明而議定之事。經上說:這是天地受生的書卷,當一切可見之物得以完備、各物分別退歸其本位之時;當這旋轉的天體確立了萬有,而那些沉重、向下傾墜的物體——即彼此相互含容的地與水——獲得了全受造界的中央之位。然而那些受造之物的某種維繫與支撐,乃是那神聖永恆的大能,植入於存在之物的本性中,並藉雙重的效用統管萬有。
9:2
In statu namque et motu non solum ex non stantibus gene­ rationem, sed permansionem subsisteotibus, machi­ nata est circa gravissimam et incommutabilem natu­ immobilitatem, velati quemdam axem stabilem atque firmissimum, velocissimam coeli circulationem ad instar rotæ jugitcr pervebens, et indissolubilem substantiam per alterutrum utrisque conservans. Nam et volubilis materia per celerrimum motum so­ liditatem terne circumacta constringit, et terræ stabilitas per immobilem iirmitatem, volubilium cir­ coitu incessanter extenditur :
For in rest and in motion it has contrived not only generation from things that do not stand, but permanence for things that subsist, around the most weighty and unchangeable immobility of nature, as it were a certain stable and most firm axis, continually carrying around the most swift circulation of heaven after the manner of a wheel, and preserving the indissoluble substance through each by means of both. For the revolving matter, by its most rapid motion, wheeling around the solidity of the earth, draws it tight, and the stability of the earth, by its immovable firmness, is unceasingly extended through the circuit of the revolving things:
因為在靜與動之中,它不僅造出了從不立之物而來的生成,更為那些自存之物造出了恆久,圍繞著本性那至為厚重而不變的不動性,彷彿某個穩定而至為堅固的軸;它如車輪一般,不斷地帶動天那至速的旋轉,並藉著彼此兩者,在這一者與那一者之中保存那不可分解的實體。因為那旋轉的物質,藉其至速的運動,環繞地的堅固而將其束緊;而地的穩定,藉其不動的堅實,又因旋轉之物不息的環行而被不斷地伸展:
9:3
æqua vero juxta unumquodque eorum quorum operatio distat, ma­ gnitudo compacta est, id est, tam ejus quæ stabilis naturæ est, quam illius quae incessabili rotatione raptatur, nam neque terra potest a propria solidi­ tate transferri, neque coelum unquam velocissima motus sui circuitione laxari. Hæc autem et prima se­ cundum Conditoris sapientiam veluti quoddam prin­ cipium totius machinæ probantur esse constructa, declarante magnifico illo Moyse per hoc quod in principio coelum et terram a Deo facta coinmemo­ rat, et quod ex motu et statione quæ videntur in hac creatura, juxta divinum consilium in. generatione cuncta producta sunt.
and an equal magnitude is fitted together according to each of those things whose operation differs, that is, both of that which is of stable nature and of that which is snatched along in unceasing rotation; for neither can the earth be transferred from its proper solidity, nor can heaven ever be slackened in the most swift revolution of its motion. And these things are proved to have been constructed first, according to the wisdom of the Creator, as it were a certain beginning of the whole fabric—as that magnificent Moses declares by this, that he commemorates the heaven and the earth to have been made by God in the beginning, and that out of the motion and the rest which are seen in this creation, according to the divine counsel, all things in generation were brought forth.
並且,按照那些運作各異之物的每一者——即那本性穩定者,與那以不息旋轉被卷掣者——一個相等的量度被配合而成;因為地既不能脫離其本有的堅固而被遷移,天也永不能在其運動至速的旋轉中鬆弛。而這些,按照造物主的智慧,被證明是首先被構造的,彷彿整個結構的某種起始——正如那偉大的梅瑟(摩西)所宣告的,他記述天與地在起初由天主所造,又記述:在這受造界中所見的動與靜之中,按照神聖的旨意,受生的萬物都被產生出來。
9:4
Cum ergo coelum et terra mensuris aequis juxta contrariam efficaciam ab invi­ cem disparata sint, ea creatura quae in medio con- trariorum est, ex parte quadam cohærentium sibi | participans, summitates divisas propria mediatione connectit. Ita ut manifestae sint contrariorum ad al­ terutrum hac interpositione conjunctionis. Nam mo­ bilis semper et subtilissimi ignis substantiam imita­ tur aliquatenus aer, tam levitate naturæ quam motos opportunitate : non tamen hujusmodi est, ut a so­ lidissimorum cognatione videatur alienus, neque semper immobilis permanens, neque jugiter effluens atque deficiens :
Since therefore heaven and earth are separated from one another by equal measures according to a contrary efficacy, that creature which is in the midst of the contraries, partaking in a certain part of the things that cohere with it, connects the divided extremities by its own mediation. So that the conjunctions of the contraries to one another are made manifest by this interposition. For the air imitates in some degree the substance of the ever-moving and most subtle fire, both by the lightness of its nature and by the readiness of its motion: yet it is not of such a kind that it should appear alien from the kinship of the most solid things, neither remaining ever immovable, nor continually flowing away and failing:
既然天與地按相反的效力以相等的量度彼此分隔,那位於諸相反者之間的受造物,藉著分受與其相連之物的某一部分,便以自身的居中作用連結那被分開的兩極。如此,諸相反者彼此之間的接合便藉這居間而得以顯明。因為空氣在某種程度上摹擬那永動而至為精微之火的實體,既因其本性之輕,也因其運動之便:然而它又非如此這般,以致顯得與那至為堅固之物的同類性相疏離,它既不永遠不動,也不持續地流逝消散:
9:5
sed utriusque proprietate veluti quibusdam contrariorum effectibus confinis efficitur, immiscens simul et dividens in seipso quæ natura discreta sunt, secundum hanc rationem a liquida quo­ que substantia gemina charitate subnixa utrisque contrarietatibus coaptatur ; quod enim gravis et in deorsum proclivis est, multa ad terrenam naturam cognatione fœderatur : quod vero fluxæ et decurren­ tis efficaciæ est, non omni modo naturæ mobilis ex­ pers esse cognoscitur :
but by the property of each it is made, as it were, neighbour to certain effects of the contraries, at once mingling and dividing within itself the things that are by nature distinct; and according to this same reckoning it is fitted together with both contrarieties, being supported also by a twofold affection toward the liquid substance. For inasmuch as it is heavy and inclined downward, it is bound by much kinship to the earthly nature; but inasmuch as it is of fluid and flowing efficacy, it is in no way known to be devoid of a movable nature:
反倒藉著兩者各自的特性,它彷彿成了諸相反者某些效用的近鄰,在自身內同時混合並分隔那些本性相異之物;並且按這同一算理,它也與兩種相反性相配合,又因對那液態實體的雙重親愛之情而得以支撐。因為它既是沉重而向下傾墜的,便藉許多同類性與屬地的本性相繫;而它既具流動奔逝的效力,便絕不被視為毫無可動的本性:
9:6
quædam namque per hoc ipsum fit oppositorum mixtura atque concursio, duin et gravitas in motu transeat, nec motus item gravitale tardetur, sed ad sese conveniant, quæ juxta summi­ tates naturaliter sunt divisa, dum sibi mutuo qua­ dam mediatione copulantur, imo polius diligentissi­ mam rationem nec ipsa contrariorum substantia sine permixtione alterius proprietatis existat. Item, quan­ tum reor, universa quae in mundo cernuntur, mutua sibi societate consentiunt, et in unum omnis crea­ tura conspirare cognoscitur, dum in oppositorum proprietatibus invenitur. Nam cum motus non solum juxta localem Lranslationem, verum et juxta vertibi­ lem modum atque mutabilem fiat :
for by this very thing there comes to be a certain mixture and concourse of opposites, while heaviness passes over into motion, nor again is motion retarded by heaviness, but they come together to one another, things that are by nature divided at their extremities, while they are mutually coupled by a certain mediation—or rather, by a most careful design not even the very substance of the contraries exists without an intermixture of the other's property. Likewise, as I judge, all the things that are discerned in the world consent to one another in mutual fellowship, and all creation is known to conspire into one, while it is found in the properties of opposites. For since motion comes about not only according to local translation, but also according to a turning and changeable manner:
因為正是藉此,便生出某種對立者的混合與會聚,沉重者過渡為運動,運動又不為沉重所遲滯,反倒彼此相就,那些本性上在兩極被分隔之物,藉某種居間而彼此相偶——或更確切地說,藉一種至為精細的設計,連諸相反者的實體本身,也無不含有對方特性的摻入而存在。同樣,依我所判斷,凡在宇宙中被察知之物,都以彼此的相互交誼而相合;全受造界在處於對立者的特性中時,被認知為齊心協同歸於一。因為運動既不僅按位置的移轉,也按轉變與可變的方式而發生:
9:7
itemque natura stabilis motum qui fit per commutationem, nulla ra­ tione recipiat : sapientia Dei proprietates uniuscu­ jusque pennutans, immobilem quidem naturam con­ vertibilem fecit, mobilem vero inconvertibilem : pro­ videntia quadam haec ita dispensans, ne quod divi­ nai naturæ est singulare vel proprium (id est im­ mobilitas et incommutabilitas ) in aliqua creatura conspecta Deum aestimare faceret creaturam. Non enim poterit anima videri opinionem habere Divini­ tatis, quod mobile vel mutabile fuerit. Idcirco, terra quidem stabilis, sed mutabilis est; cœlum vero econ­ trario cum non sit mutabile, simul nec stabile est :
and likewise the stable nature in no way admits the motion which comes about through change: the wisdom of God, permuting the properties of each, made the immovable nature indeed convertible, but the movable nature inconvertible—dispensing these things thus by a certain providence, lest that which is singular or proper to the divine nature (that is, immobility and unchangeableness), being beheld in some creature, should cause one to esteem the creature to be God. For the soul will not be able to be seen to hold the opinion of Divinity concerning that which is movable or mutable. For this reason the earth indeed is stable, but mutable; whereas heaven, on the contrary, since it is not mutable, is at the same time not stable:
同樣,那穩定的本性絕不接納那藉變遷而生的運動:天主的智慧,將兩者各自的特性互換,使那不動的本性反成可變,使那可動的本性反成不可變——以某種照顧如此安排這些事,免得那唯獨屬於神聖本性者(即不動性與不變性),若在某受造物中被看見,便使人估量該受造物為天主。因為靈魂不能被視為對那可動或可變之物持有「神性」的見解。為此緣故,地固然是穩定的,卻是可變的;而天則反之,既非可變,便同時亦非穩定:
9:8
ut stabili quidem substantiae mutabililatem, incom- mutabili vero mobilitatem divina virtus adnectens, et alterutrum per utriusque contrarietatem suis pro­ prietatibus copulans, a Divinitatis opinione remove­ ret, quod neutrum horum ( sicut dictum est) divinæ naturæ putabitur, id quod mutabile et instabile com­ probabitur. Universa igitur ad suum finem congruen­ ter aptata sunt. Perfecta sunt enim, sicut Moyses ail, cœlum et terra et quæ inter hæc media sunt, omnia mira pulchritudine, singula quæque compe­ tenter ornata : coelum quidem stellarum luminibus micans; mare vero atque aer animantibus tam nata­ bilibus quam volatilibus mire tripudians ;
so that the divine power, by attaching mutability to the stable substance and mobility to the unchangeable, and coupling each to the other through the contrariety of both by their own properties, might remove from the opinion of Divinity that which is neither of these (as has been said) of the divine nature, namely that which is proved to be mutable and unstable. All things, therefore, have been fittingly adapted to their own end. For they are perfect, as Moses says: the heaven and the earth and those things that are midway between them, all of wondrous beauty, each thing suitably adorned: the heaven indeed glittering with the lights of the stars; the sea and the air wondrously exulting with living things, both those that swim and those that fly;
如此,神聖的大能,藉著將可變性繫於那穩定的實體、將可動性繫於那不變者,並藉兩者的相反性以各自的特性使彼此相偶,便將那既非二者之一者(如前所言)從「神性」的見解中除去,即那被證明為可變而不穩定者。故此,萬物都已適切地配合其本有的終向。因為它們是完備的,正如梅瑟所說:天與地,以及介於其間之物,無不具有奇妙的美麗,各物都得體地受了裝飾:天閃爍著群星之光;海與空氣則以游水與飛翔的生靈奇妙地歡騰;
9:9
terra vero multimodis herbarum naturis, virgultorum diversita­ tibus quodam modo gestiens, quæ conservantem cuncta divino num vegetata progenuit; et repleta quidem erat speciebus universis simul cum floribus fructus quoque producens, plena et parata his quæ in eis solita sunt oriri: cuncta quoque dorsa montium atque cacumina et quidquid convexum atque supi­ num, vel in convallibus planum atque substratum herbarum nova specie et varia arborum pulchritu­ dine coronabantur, modo quidem de terris eminen­ tia; sed ad perfectionis suæ concurrentia mox deco­ rem lætabantur, universa juxta modum suum præ­ cepto vivificata divino.
but the earth, exulting in a certain way with the manifold natures of herbs and the diversities of shrubs, which, quickened by the divine power that preserves all things, brought forth; and indeed it was filled with all kinds of species, producing fruits together with flowers, full and prepared for those things that are wont to arise in them: all the ridges too of the mountains and the summits, and whatever is convex and upturned, or level and outspread in the valleys, were crowned with the new species of herbs and the varied beauty of trees—at one moment, as it were, eminences rising out of the earth, but soon rejoicing in the comeliness that hastens to their perfection, all things quickened according to their own measure by the divine command.
地則以草木之繁多本性、灌叢之種種差異而某種程度地歡騰;這些植物因那保存萬物的神聖大能所激發而生長出來;地確被各樣物種充滿,與花朵一同產出果實,飽滿而齊備,足供那些慣於從中生起之物:連山的一切山脊與峰頂,凡凸起仰天者,或在谷中平鋪展開者,都以草木的新樣物種與林木的繽紛美麗為冠冕——一時間,彷彿從地中聳起的隆突,旋即又因那趨向其完美的秀美而歡欣,萬物各按其度,因神聖的命令而被賦予生氣。
9:10
Jumenta quidem gregatim juxta proprium genus in silva discurrentia moraban­ tur; avium vero modulatis cantibus omnium silvarum consona resonabant. Maris etiam facies (ut aestimare licet) maxima tunc erat placiditate et tranquillitate suis congregationibus profundissimis constituta. Juxta quam stationes et portus divina voluntate veluti quidam sinus effecti per littora terris maria copulabant, quietissimi etiam motus undarum vibra­ bantur veluti prata vfrentia, tenuissimis atque in­ noxiis flatibus summitatis superficiem congrua sub­ tilitate crispantes, et universus orbis secundum crea­ tionem suam terra marique paratus astabat. Sed qui his uteretur interim non erat. CAPUT II.
The beasts of burden indeed, herd by herd according to their own kind, lingered as they ran about in the wood; and with the modulated songs of the birds all the woods resounded in harmony. The face of the sea also (as one may esteem) was then established in its deepest gatherings with the greatest placidity and tranquillity. Beside it, stations and harbours, made as it were certain bays by the divine will, joined the seas to the lands along the shores; and the most quiet motions of the waves were rippled like green meadows, ruffling the surface of their upper face with fitting subtlety by the slightest and harmless breezes; and the whole globe, according to its creation, stood prepared by land and sea. But meanwhile there was none who might make use of these things. CHAPTER TWO.
那些馱獸,確是一群一群按其本類,在林中奔走盤桓;眾鳥以其抑揚的歌聲,使全林和諧地回響。海面(如人所能估量的)那時也以至極的安寧與平靜,安立於其至深的彙聚之中。其旁的泊地與港灣,彷彿因神聖的旨意而成的某些海灣,沿著岸濱把眾海與陸地相連;波濤至為靜謐的起伏如青翠的草甸般蕩漾,以最輕微而無害的微風,用適宜的精細皺起其表面之上層;全地球按其受造,已在陸與海上預備妥當而矗立。然而其間卻無人可使用這一切。第二章。
9:11
Cur novissimus post creaturam factus sit homo. Nondum namque magna bacc et pretiosa res homo mundi dominus aderat, nec enim decuerat prius existere principem quam illa quorum gereret princi. palum, Sed ubi cuncta ei subjicicnda parata sunt, jam consequens erat apparere rectorem. Quia igitur veluti quoddam regni domicilium futuro regi Crcator universitatis effecerat, id autem erat terra, insulæ, maria, et super haec coelum in modum cameræ cur­ vatum; divitias vero reposuerat regni multiplices;
Why man was made last after the creation. For not yet was that great and precious thing, man, the lord of the world, present; nor indeed had it been fitting that the prince should exist before those things over which he would exercise his princely rule. But when all things had been prepared to be subjected to him, it was now consequent that the ruler should appear. Since therefore the Creator of the universe had made, as it were, a certain royal dwelling for the future king—and this was the earth, islands, seas, and above these the heaven curved in the manner of a vault—and had stored up the manifold riches of the kingdom;
何以人在受造萬物之後最末被造。因為那偉大而珍貴之物——人,世界的主宰——尚未在場;事實上,那君長若先於他將要統治之物而存在,本是不相宜的。但當萬物都已預備妥當、要被臣服於他之時,那統治者出現便成了理所當然之事。既然萬有的造物主已彷彿為那未來的君王造了某座王宮——這便是地、海島、眾海,及在這些之上如穹頂般彎曲的天——又已積蓄了王國繁多的財富;
9:12
divitias autem dico totam creaturam quidquid est in herbis et planlis et arboribus, quidquid in spiritali­ bus et sensilibus et animatis, quod nisi metalla quo­ que his convenit adnumerari divitiis quæ propter colorum pulchritudinem pretiosa humanis oculis visa sunt, ut auri et argenti et lapidum eorum quos ho­ mines amant, horum omnium copiam velut quibus­ dam regalibus thesauris terræ finibus occulens, in hunc mundum hominem protinus introduxit, ut quo­ rumdam miraculorum spectator existeret, quorum- dam vero dominatum principaliter obtineret;
and by riches I mean the whole creation—whatever is in herbs and plants and trees, whatever is in things spiritual and sensible and animate; to which riches it is fitting that even the metals too be numbered, which on account of the beauty of their colours have seemed precious to human eyes, such as gold and silver and those stones that men love—hiding away the abundance of all these, as in certain royal treasuries, within the bounds of the earth, He straightway introduced man into this world, that he might be a spectator of certain wonders, but of certain others might hold the dominion as ruler;
我所謂財富,乃指全受造界——凡在草木與植株與樹林中之物,凡在屬靈、可感與有生命之物中者;對這些財富,連金屬也理當一併計入,因它們憑其顏色之美而在人眼中顯為珍貴,如金、銀,與人所喜愛的那些寶石——天主把這一切的豐盈彷彿藏於某些王室寶庫,隱於地的疆界之內,旋即把人引進這世界,好叫他成為某些奇蹟的觀賞者,對另一些則作為統治者持掌主權;
9:13
quale­ nus per ea quibus uteretur intelligeret largitorem, per ea vero quae pulchra et magnilica contem­ platur, ineffabilem sui factoris posset investigare po­ tentiam. Propterea novissimus in hunc mundum post creaturam introductus est homo : non ut vilissimus in extrema parte projectus, sed quem decebat geni­ tum mox esse rectorem. Nam sicut quidam optimus invitator non prius in domum pransorem quam præ­ paret epulas introducit, sed omnem apparatum in­ struens, domumque congruenter exornans, discu­ bitum quoque et mensam et caetera; tunc ad prae­ paratas jam deiicias convocatum invitat :
so that through the things he would use he might understand the Bestower, and through the things he contemplates as beautiful and magnificent he might be able to investigate the ineffable power of his Maker. For this reason man was introduced last into this world after the creation: not as the most vile, cast off in the extremest part, but as one whom it befitted to be straightway begotten as ruler. For just as a certain excellent host does not introduce the diner into the house before he has prepared the feast, but, setting in order all the furnishings and fittingly adorning the house—the couches too, and the table, and the rest—then invites the summoned guest to the delights now made ready:
如此,他便能藉所使用之物認識那賜予者,又能藉他所默觀為美麗壯偉之物,探尋其造主那不可言喻的大能。為此緣故,人在受造萬物之後最末被引進這世界:並非作為至為卑賤者、被拋擲於最末之處,乃是作為一位理當一受生即為統治者的。因為正如某位卓越的主人,不先預備好筵席便不引就餐者入屋,而是先安排好一切陳設、得體地裝飾房屋——連坐榻、餐桌及其餘——然後才邀請那被召之客來赴那已備妥的盛宴:
9:14
juxta hunc modum dives et copiosus nostræ conditor edu­ catorque substantiae, bonis omnibus replens habita culum mundi hujus et magnas has epulas variasque disponens, sic introduxit hominem, dans ei opus eximium custodire mandatum , quo non appetitu re­ rum non exstantium, sed præsentium possessione gauderet. Ideirco etiam duplicis compositionis ei causas intexuit, terreno spirituale commiscens, ut per utriusque cognationem utraque proprietate po­ tiretur, Deo quidem spiritualiter fruens, terrena vero bona corporali usu percipiens. CAPUT III. Quod pretiosior omni creatura qua videtur, existat humana conditio.
after this manner the rich and abundant Creator and Nurturer of our substance, filling the dwelling of this world with all good things and arranging these great and varied feasts, thus introduced man, giving him as an excellent task to keep a commandment, so that he might rejoice not in the appetite of things that do not exist, but in the possession of things present. Therefore He also wove for him the causes of a twofold composition, mingling the spiritual with the earthly, so that through the kinship of both he might possess each property—enjoying God spiritually indeed, but receiving earthly goods by bodily use. CHAPTER THREE. That the human condition is more precious than every creature that is seen.
按這方式,那富足而豐盈的造主與我們本性的養育者,以一切美善之物充滿這世界的居所,並安排這些偉大而繽紛的盛宴,遂如此引進了人,賜給他守一條誡命作為卓越的職分,好叫他不在那不存在之物的貪欲中、而在那現存之物的擁有中歡欣。因此祂也為他編織了雙重組成的緣由,將屬靈者與屬地者相混,好叫他藉兩者的同類性而擁有各自的特性——既在靈裡享受天主,又藉身體的使用領受屬地的美物。第三章。論人的境況比一切可見的受造物更為珍貴。
9:15
Dignum vero est ut nec ista res incontemplata prætereat, quod tanti hujus orbis exstructio et par­ tium ejus quibus in elementis continetur universitas, a divina potentia perficiatur extemplo pariter cum jussione subsistens, hominis autem formationem artilicis praecedebat tanti consilium, et descriptione verbi quod futurum est ante signatur, qualemque esse oporteat, et cujus primae formæ similitudinem referat, ob quam causam fiat, quidve finitus efficiat, et quorum dominatum gerat, omnia prius actione perspecta sunt, ut ante generationem suam homo antiquiorem quodammodo sortitus sit dignitatem, priusquaM subsisteret universorum possidens princi­ patum. Dixit enim Deus :
But it is worthy that this matter too should not pass by uncontemplated: that the construction of this so great world, and the universality of its parts by which it is contained in the elements, is brought to perfection by the divine power on the instant, subsisting together with the command; whereas the formation of man was preceded by the counsel of so great an Artificer, and by the description of the word it is signified beforehand what is to be—what manner of thing it ought to be, and the similitude of what first form it should bear, for what cause it should come to be, and what, when finished, it should effect, and over what things it should hold dominion. All these were first perceived in action, so that before his generation man might in a certain way obtain a more ancient dignity, possessing the principate of all things before he subsisted. For God said:
然而這事也理當不被無所默觀地略過:這如此偉大的世界之構造,及其各部分(藉這些它得以含容於諸元素之內)的全體,乃由神聖的大能在頃刻間、與命令一同成就而臻於完備;至於人的受造,卻有如此偉大的造化者的籌議在先,並藉言語的描述預先標明那將要存在者——它當是何等之物,當帶有何種最初形相的肖似,為何緣由而被造,當其完成時當成就何事,又當統治何物。這一切都先在行動中被察知,好叫人在受生之先,便以某種方式獲得一份更為古老的尊嚴,在他自存之先便已擁有萬有的元首之位。因為天主說:
9:16
Faciamus hominem ad ima­ ginem et similitudinem nostram, et dominetur piscibus ,naris, et bestiis terræ et volatilibus coeli, et pecoribus universæ terræ. 0 quale niiraculum! sol fit, et nul­ lum praecedit consilium; coelum quoque, cui nihil in creaturis visibilibus simile reperitur, verbo solo perficitur, et opus tam mirabile nec unde fiat nec qualiter, intimatur : sic et singula quæque creatu­ rarum, æther, stellae et aer qui medium locum COn­ tinet, mare, terra, animalia et nascentia omnia, verbo tantummodo producuntur ut sint;
Let us make man to our image and likeness, and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and over the beasts of the earth, and over the birds of heaven, and over the cattle of the whole earth. O what a marvel! the sun comes to be, and no counsel precedes it; the heaven also, to which nothing in the visible creatures is found similar, is perfected by a word alone, and so wondrous a work—neither whence it should be made nor in what manner—is intimated: so too each single one of the creatures, the ether, the stars, and the air which holds the middle place, the sea, the earth, the animals and all things that are born, are produced by a word only, that they may be;
我們要照我們的肖像與模樣造人,叫他管理海中的魚、地上的走獸、天空的飛鳥,及全地的牲畜。哦,何等的奇妙!太陽出現了,卻無任何籌議在先;天也是——可見的受造物中找不到任何與它相似者——僅憑一句話便得以完成,而這如此奇妙之工,無論是從何而造、抑或以何方式而造,都未被表明:諸受造物中的每一者也是如此,蒼穹、群星,及佔據中央之位的空氣,海、地、走獸與一切受生之物,都僅憑一句話便被產生,使其得以存在;
9:17
ad hominis autem solius conditionem cum consilio quodammodo Conditor universitatis accedit, et materiam quae constructioni ejus sit necessaria praeparat, et ad for­ mam primævæ ac principalis pulchritudinis ejus coaptat similitudinem, et intentionem, cujus rei gra­ tia fiat, insinuat, congruam illi naturam effectibus suis instituens, quae ad propositum aptissima esse probatur. CAPUT IV. Quare per omnia imperiosam quamdam potestatem ipsa constructio humana significet.
but to the making of man alone the Creator of the universe approaches, as it were, with counsel, and prepares the matter that is necessary for his construction, and fits the likeness of him to the form of the primal and principal beauty, and intimates the intention, for the sake of what thing he should come to be, establishing for him a nature congruous to its effects, which is proved to be most apt for the purpose. CHAPTER FOUR. Why in all respects the very construction of man should signify a certain imperious power.
惟獨對人的造成,萬有的造物主彷彿帶著籌議而臨近,並預備那為他構造所必需的質料,又使他的肖似配合於那最初而首要之美的形相,並表明其意向——他為何緣由而被造,為他立定一個與其效用相稱的本性,這本性被證明為最適於那目的。第四章。何以在一切方面,人的構造本身都標誌著某種統御的權能。
9:18
Sicut enim in bac vita ad quoslibet usus ab artifici­ bus instrumenta competenter aptantur, ita veluti res quaedam ad opus imperii congruens ab optimo arti­ fice natura nostra construitur, quæ sive juxta animae prærogativam, seu juxta corporis habitum talis exi­ steret, quae ad imperandum opportunior appareret: denique anima, id quod regale atque sublimissimum est, suæ substantiae et a privata procul humilitate se­ junctum clarius hinc declaratur, quod nullius subji­ ciatur imperio, habens arbitrii libertatem, suoque se nutu atque moderatione dispensans, cujus enim hoc nisi imperantis est proprium ?
For just as in this life instruments are suitably fitted by craftsmen for whatever uses, so our nature is constructed by the most excellent Artificer as a certain thing congruous to the work of rule, which, whether according to the prerogative of the soul or according to the habit of the body, would be such as should appear more opportune for commanding. In short, the soul—that which is royal and most sublime, sundered far from private lowliness of its substance—is hence more clearly declared, in that it is subjected to no one's rule, having the freedom of choice, and dispensing itself by its own will and governance; for whose property is this, save the one who commands?
因為正如在今生中,工匠為各種用途適切地配備器具,照樣,我們的本性也被那至為卓越的造化者構造為某種與統治之工相稱之物;這本性無論按靈魂的優越權,或按身體的狀態,都當是顯得更宜於發號施令的。簡言之,靈魂——那屬王者而至為崇高、遠離其實體之卑微低賤者——便由此更清楚地被宣明,因它不臣服於任何人的統治,擁有抉擇的自由,並以其自身的意志與節制支配自己;因為除了那發號施令者,這還是誰的特性呢?
9:19
Super hæc etiam to­ tius creatune Dominus ad imaginem sui Creatoris ef­ fectus, nihil aliud indicat, nisi quod mox in eo regia natura formata sit. Sicut enim juxta humanam con­ suetudinem, qui principum imaginem fingunt, non solum impressionem formæ ejns imitantur, verum etiam amictu purpureo describunt regiam dignitatem, et imago ipsa jam pro consuetudine dicitur impera­ tor; sic et bumana substantia. qnoniam ad aliorum regimen condebatur propter similitudinem regis uni­ versorum, velut quaedam imago animata componitur, primae vero formæ et nomine et honore participans, non tegmine circumamicto purpura, nec sceptro vel diademate gloriam suæ dignitatis insinuans:
Over and above these things, the Lord of the whole creation, made to the image of his Creator, indicates nothing else than that straightway in him a royal nature was formed. For just as, according to human custom, those who fashion the image of princes not only imitate the impression of his form, but also depict the royal dignity by the purple robe, and the image itself is already by custom called emperor; so also the human substance—since it was being founded for the rule of others on account of the likeness of the King of the universe—is composed as a certain living image, partaking of the primal form both in name and in honour, not by a covering wrapped about with purple, nor by sceptre or diadem intimating the glory of its dignity:
此外,全受造界的主宰,既照其造主的肖像而被造,所表明的無非是:在他身上立即有一個王者的本性被造成。因為正如按人間的習俗,那些雕塑君王肖像者,不僅摹擬其形貌的印記,更以紫袍描繪那王者的尊嚴,而那肖像本身按習俗便已被稱為皇帝;照樣,人的本性——既因萬有之王的肖似而被立定,要去統治其他受造物——便被組成為某種有生命的肖像,在名分與尊榮上分受那最初的形相,並非藉裹身的紫袍,也非藉權杖或冠冕來表明其尊嚴的榮耀:
9:20
nec enim principalis forma in his esse conspicitur : sed pro purpureo velamine, vestita virtute est, quas omnium ornamentorum regalium preliosior approbatur; pro sceptro vero beatitudine et inunortalitate sustollitur, et regali serto justitiæ corona decoratur: ita ut per haec omnia monstretur ad dignitatem regiam genitam pulchritudinem in se primævæ formæ diligenter ex­ primere. CAPUT V. Quod homo similitudo probetur imperii. Divinam vero pulchritudinem non habitu quodam ac specie, vel alicujus claritate coloris ornatam, sed ineffabili felicitatis honore provehi constat.
For no royal form, properly speaking, is seen to reside in these things; but in place of a purple robe she is clothed with virtue, which is approved as more precious than all royal ornaments; and in place of a sceptre she is upheld by blessedness and immortality; and with the royal diadem of righteousness she is adorned as with a crown. So that through all these things it is shown that the beauty begotten unto royal dignity diligently expresses in itself the likeness of the primal Form. CHAPTER V. That man is shown to be the likeness of sovereignty. But the divine beauty, it is clear, is not adorned by any outward garb or appearance, nor by the brightness of any colour, but is set forth by an ineffable honour of felicity.
因為在這些事物中並不見有真正君王的形貌;反倒她不披紫袍,而以德行為衣,這德行被認定比一切君王的裝飾更為寶貴;她不持權杖,而以福樂與不朽被高舉;又以公義的君王冠冕得著裝飾。如此一切都顯明:那為君王尊榮而生的美麗,殷勤地在自身中表現出原初形象的樣式。第五章 論人被證為主權的肖像。然而神聖的美麗顯然不是以某種外表的裝束或樣式,也不是以任何色彩的光輝得著裝飾,乃是以一種無法言喻的福樂之尊榮被高舉。
9:21
Sicut enim formashominum per colores quosdam pictores in ta­ bulis transferunt, tincturas proprias congruasque miscentes, ita ut primævæ formæ decor in similitudi­ nem diligentissima mutatione transmigret: sic intel­ ligo nostræ substantiae formatorem, velut quibusdam virtutum coloribus, miram pulchritudinem suae ima­ gini contulisse, in nobis exprimentem proprium prin­ cipatum. Sunt autem multiplices et multiformes co­ lores bujus imaginis, quibus veræ formæ similitudo de­ pingitur.
For just as painters transfer the forms of men onto panels by means of certain colours, mixing the proper and fitting pigments, so that the grace of the primal form passes over into a likeness by a most diligent transformation: so do I understand that the Fashioner of our substance, as it were by certain colours of the virtues, bestowed a wondrous beauty upon His own image, expressing in us His proper sovereignty. Now manifold and multiform are the colours of this image, by which the likeness of the true Form is depicted.
正如畫家用某些顏料,調配出恰當而相稱的色彩,把人的形貌移繪在畫板上,使原初形象的美麗藉著極其殷勤的變換轉入一個肖像之中:照樣,我認為我們本質的塑造者,彷彿用某些德行的色彩,將奇妙的美麗賦予祂自己的形象,在我們裡面表現出祂本有的主權。這形象的色彩是多種多樣、形態各異的,真實形象的樣式便藉這些色彩被描繪出來。
9:22
non cerussa et purpurisso, nec horum mixta cum altero qualitas, nec alicujus nigredinis superdu­ ctio cilia oculosque sublinit, et per aliquod tempera­ mentumdepressa et concava assimilatur character vel quæcunque similia pietorum manus artificis compo­ suere solertia, sed pro istis adest puritas, impassihi­ litas, beatitudo, malique totius aversio, et quæcunque generis istius existunt, per quæ in hominibus impri­ mitur similitudo divina. Talibus floribus mirabilis Conditor imaginem propriam, id est naturam nostrae conditionis ornavit.
It is not white lead and rouge, nor any quality of these mixed one with another, nor the laying-on of some black that lines the eyelids and the eyes, and the contour fashioned hollow and sunken by some blending, or whatever like things the hand of the painter has composed by the skill of the craftsman; but in place of these there is present purity, impassibility, blessedness, the turning-away from all evil, and whatever else is of this kind, through which the divine likeness is imprinted in men. With such flowers did the wondrous Creator adorn His own image, that is, the nature of our condition.
這不是鉛白與胭脂,也不是這些彼此調和的某種色質,也不是用某種黑色塗抹眼瞼和雙眼,藉某種調色使輪廓顯得低凹深陷,或畫家之手憑工匠的巧思所構成的任何類似之物;反倒在這些之外,所臨到的是純潔、不動情、福樂、對一切邪惡的厭離,以及凡屬這一類的事,神聖的樣式便藉這些印在人身上。奇妙的創造者就是用這樣的花朵裝飾了祂自己的形象,就是我們受造本性的天性。
9:23
Si vero discutias et alia per quæ divinam decus elucet, hæc etiam in imagine ad illius similitudinem salva profecto reperies, mens etenim et verbum est summa Divinitas. In principio namque erat Verbum, et qui, secundum Paulum, proficiunt, mentem Christi , qui in eis loquitur, se habere profi­ tentur. Non ergo procul hæc a natura humana con­ spicias: in te namque et verbum et intelligentia est, quæ imitantur verbum mentemque divinam. Item eharitas, fonsque charitat6;hoc enim. ait magnus ille Joannes, quoniam charitas ex Deo est. Hanc autem nobis veluti personam Chrislus formator nostrae sub­ stantiæ conferens, ait:
But if you examine also the other things through which the divine glory shines forth, these too you will assuredly find preserved intact in the image after His likeness; for the supreme Godhead is mind and word. For in the beginning was the Word; and those who, according to Paul, make progress profess that they have the mind of Christ, who speaks in them. Do not, therefore, behold these things as far removed from human nature: for in you also there is both word and understanding, which imitate the Word and Mind divine. Likewise charity, and the fountain of charity; for this, says that great John, because charity is of God. This, as it were a person, Christ the Fashioner of our substance, bestowing it upon us, says:
但若你考察那神聖榮耀藉以發光的其他各樣事物,你也必確然發現它們在那按祂樣式所造的形象中完好保存;因為至高的神性乃是心智與道。因為太初有道;按照保羅所說,那些長進的人宣稱自己有基督的心,就是那在他們裡面說話的基督。所以不要把這些事看作遠離人性:因為在你裡面也有道與悟性,它們效法那神聖的道與心智。同樣還有愛,以及愛的源頭;因為那位偉大的約翰說,因為愛是從神而來的。基督這位我們本質的塑造者,把這彷彿一個位格的愛賜給我們,說:
9:24
In hoc cognoscent omnes quo­ xium mei estis discipuli, si dilectionem habueritis ad invicem. Quod si dilectio nobis ista defuerit, totius imaginis species figuraque solvetur. Cuncta etiam conspicit exauditque Divinitas et omnia perscruta­ tur. Habes et tu per oculos et aures hujus rei effica­ ciam vitalem et scrutatricem eorum quæ sunt intelli­ gentiam te possidere cognoscis. CAPUT VI. Inquisi io, quam consignationem mens habeat ad natu­ ram, in qno etiam obiter Eunomianorum dogma re­ fellitur. Nec me quisquam suspicetur ad similitudinem operationis humanæ diversis effectibus divinam di­ cere potentiam euneta complecti.
By this shall all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love one toward another. But if this love be lacking in us, the whole appearance and figure of the image shall be dissolved. The Godhead also beholds and hearkens to all things and searches out all things. You too have, through your eyes and ears, the living efficacy of this matter, and you know that you possess an understanding that searches out the things that are. CHAPTER VI. An inquiry as to what relation the mind bears to nature, in which also the doctrine of the Eunomians is incidentally refuted. Let no one suspect me of saying that the divine power, after the likeness of human operation, embraces all things by diverse effects.
你們若彼此相愛,眾人因此就認出你們是我的門徒。但這愛若在我們裡面缺乏,整個形象的外貌與形狀便要消散。神性也看見並垂聽萬有,並查究一切。你也藉著你的眼睛和耳朵,擁有這事活潑的功效,並且你知道你具有一種能查究萬有的悟性。第六章 探究心智與本性有何關係,其中也順帶駁斥幽諾米派的教義。願無人懷疑我說神聖的能力是仿照人的運作、藉著各種不同的作用來統攝萬有。
9:25
Nec enim fas est in illa divina simplicitate variam multiplicemque virtutem operationis advertere, nec in nobis enim multæ quaedam sunt efficaces rerum causarumque potentiæ, licet ea quae ad vitam pertineant multiplici videantur operatione contingere. Una namque vis quaedam nobis mentis inserta est, quæ per singulos sensus excurrens, ea quæ sibi offeruntur amplectitur. Hæc per oculos quae videnda sunt conspicit; hæc per aura quae dicuntur exaudit; hæc in his qua: sunt vo­ tiva letatur, et ab bis quæinsuavia probantur, avcr­ titur. Manibus etiam perficit quæcunque voluerit, retinens bis et rursus abjiciens horumque instru­ mentorum effectibus utens ut expedire probaverit.
For it is not lawful to perceive in that divine simplicity a varied and manifold power of operation; nor indeed in us are there many efficacious powers of things and causes, although the things that pertain to life seem to come about by a manifold operation. For there is implanted in us a single power, namely of the mind, which running out through each of the senses lays hold of the things that are presented to it. This through the eyes beholds the things to be seen; this through the ears hears the things that are spoken; this in those things which are desirable rejoices, and from those which are judged unpleasant turns away. With the hands too it accomplishes whatever it wills, retaining things and again casting them off, and using the effects of these instruments as it judges expedient.
因為在那神聖的單純之中察覺有種種多樣繁複的運作能力,這是不合宜的;就連在我們裡面,也沒有許多各自有效的事物與緣由的能力,儘管那些與生命有關的事似乎是藉著繁多的運作而發生的。因為在我們裡面只植有一種能力,就是心智的能力,它穿行於各個感官之中,把所呈現給它的事物攬取過來。它藉眼睛觀看當看之物;藉耳朵聽見所說之話;在那些可喜之物中歡欣,並從那些被判為不悅之物轉開。它也用雙手成就凡它所願的,既保留又拋棄,並照它所認為有益的來運用這些器官的功效。
9:26
Si ergo in homine, cui diversa membrorum officia ab auctore formata sunt, una eademque res est, quæ per omnes aeusus operatur, utens singulis congruenter ut caat. poposcerit, nec operationum differentiis naturæ suæ vim potentiamque commutat; quanto magis in Deo, quia sint effectus virtutum varii, nul- lus debet multiplicem ejus essentiam suspicari ? Quf enim plantavit aurem, non audit ? aut qui finxit ocu­ tum, non considerat ? Sicut propheta testatur, per haec exempla opcrationes hujusmodi veluti quasdam humanae naturae notissimas impressiones insinuans : Faciamus enim, ait Deus, hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram.
If then in man, for whom the diverse functions of the members have been fashioned by their Author, it is one and the same thing that operates through all the senses, using each fittingly as the occasion may demand, nor by the differences of operations does it change the force and power of its nature: how much more in God, although the effects of His powers be diverse, ought no one to suspect His essence to be manifold? For He that planted the ear, does He not hear? Or He that fashioned the eye, does He not consider? As the prophet testifies, by these examples insinuating operations of this kind as it were certain most familiar impressions of human nature: For let us make, says God, man unto our image and likeness.
那麼,在人裡面,既然各肢體不同的功用是由其創造者所造成,而那藉一切感官運作的卻是同一個東西,按照場合所要求的恰當地運用每一肢體,並且不因運作的差異而改變其本性的力量與能力:那麼在神裡面,儘管祂能力的作用是多種多樣的,人豈不更該斷不可懷疑祂的本質是繁多的麼?因為那栽植耳朵的,豈不聽見麼?那塑造眼睛的,豈不察看麼?正如先知所見證的,藉這些例子把這一類的運作彷彿當作人性中最為人所熟知的某些印記來暗示:神說,我們要照我們的形象、按我們的樣式造人。
9:27
Sed ubi mihi nunc hæresis Eunomianorum nefanda subsistet, quid adversus hanc dicturi sunt vocem? Quomodo per hæc Verba novitatem sui defensuri sunt dogmatis ? Putasne pos­ sibile esse, dicent, ut imago una dissimilium forma­ rum similitudinem referat? Si enim juxta illorum sententiam naturae Patris impar est Filius, quomodo diversarum naturarum unam Deus condidit imagi­ nem? Qui enim dixit : Faciamus hominem ad imagi- nem nostram, per pluralem significantiam sanctam nobis insinuans Trinitatem, nequaquam singulariter suam testaretur imaginem, si primævæ formæ sibi dissimiles exstitissent. Nec enim possibile est ut eo­ rum qui sibi invicem congruunt minime, una simili­ tudo monstretur;
But where now will the abominable heresy of the Eunomians stand for me? What will they say against this utterance? How by these words will they defend the novelty of their doctrine? Is it possible, they will say, that one image should reflect the likeness of dissimilar forms? For if, according to their opinion, the Son is unequal to the nature of the Father, how did God form one image of diverse natures? For He who said, Let us make man unto our image, insinuating to us the holy Trinity by the plural signification, would by no means have testified to His image in the singular, if the primal Forms had stood dissimilar to one another. For it is not possible that of those which least agree with one another, one single likeness should be shown;
但如今幽諾米派那可憎的異端在我面前還能站立得住麼?他們對這句話要說什麼來反駁呢?他們要怎樣藉這些話為其教義的新奇辯護呢?他們會說:豈有可能一個形象反映出不相似之諸形態的樣式麼?因為若按他們的見解,子在本性上不等同於父,那麼神怎能造出諸不同本性的一個形象呢?因為那位說「我們要照我們的形象造人」的,藉著複數的稱謂向我們暗示那神聖的三位一體;倘若原初的諸形象彼此不相似,祂斷不會用單數見證祂的形象。因為凡彼此毫不相合的,斷不可能顯出單一的相似;
9:28
sed si diversae erant naturae, pro­ fecto diversas eorum et singulis eongruentes imagi­ nes condidisset. Utrum quia una quidem imago, sed non una imaginis forma est, quis ita privatur intelli­ geniia ut ignorare queat, quod ca quæ uni probantur esse similia, et ad se invicem similitudinem propriam sine dubitatione conservent? Et forsitan propterea sermo divinus hanc malitiam in conditione humanæ vitæ prospicicn , Eunomianorumque pervenitatem resecans, ait : Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram. CAPUT VII. Cur nudus homo naturalibus armis et velaminibus ap­ probetur.
but if the natures had been diverse, He would assuredly have formed diverse images of them, each suited to each. Or is it because there is indeed one image, but the form of the image is not one? Who is so bereft of understanding that he can fail to know that those things which are approved as like to one single thing preserve also, beyond all doubt, their own likeness to one another? And perhaps for this reason the divine word, foreseeing this malice in the constitution of human life, and cutting off the perversity of the Eunomians, says: Let us make man unto our image and likeness. CHAPTER VII. Why naked man is approved as wanting natural weapons and coverings.
但諸本性若是不同的,祂必定會造出彼此不同、各自相配的諸形象。難道是因為形象固然是一個,而形象的形態卻不是一個麼?有誰會如此喪失悟性,以致不能明白:凡被認為與某一單一之物相似的,也必毫無疑問地彼此保存其本有的相似呢?或許正因如此,那神聖的話語預見了人類生命構造中的這惡意,並要剪除幽諾米派的乖謬,便說:我們要照我們的形象、按我們的樣式造人。第七章 論為何赤身的人被造為缺乏天然的武器與遮蓋。
9:29
Sed quid sibi vult et ipsius habitudinis rectitudo, quid autem non ad vitam congenerantur corpori vir­ tutis effectus, verum nudus quidem naturalibus te­ gumentis inermis etiam et inops omniumque neces­ sariarum rerum egentissimus homo in hanc produci­ tur vitam, qui juxta id quod cernitur miseratione potius quam felicitate dignus esse videatur. Non enim armatur productione cornuum, non unguium vel dentium tuitionemunitur, nec aliquo aculeo te­ thiferum virus infunditur; quibus rebus pleraque fe­ rarum atque serpentium in ultionem sui naluralifer instruuntur;
But what does the very uprightness of his posture intend; and why are the effects of bodily strength not co-born with him for life, but rather man is brought into this life naked, unarmed even with natural coverings, helpless and most destitute of all necessary things, who, by what is seen, would appear to be worthy of compassion rather than of felicity? For he is not armed by the production of horns, nor fortified with the protection of claws or teeth, nor is any death-bearing venom infused into some sting—with which things most of the beasts and serpents are by nature equipped for their own defence;
但他身姿的端正本身意欲表明什麼;而為何身體強壯的諸般效力沒有與他一同生來以資生存,反倒人是赤身地被帶入這生命,連天然的遮蓋也無,既無武裝,又無依靠,在一切必需之物上極其貧乏,以致照所見的看來,似乎配得憐憫多過配得福樂?因為他既未以長出的角為武裝,也未以爪牙的防護為堅固,也沒有任何致命的毒液被注入某種螫刺之中——而野獸與蛇類大多是天然地配備了這些以資自衛;
9:30
nec pilis corpus obtegitur, cum oporte­ ret eum qui ad aliorum proponebatur imperium pro­ priis armis naturali provisione vallari, ne ad custo­ diam sui aliorum adminiculis indigeret. Nunc autem leo quidcm et aper et tigris et pardus, vel si qui i his simile est, sufficientem pro salute sua virtutem natu­ raliter possidet ; et tauro cornua sunt, et pernicitas lepori, cervoque saltus et certus intuitus, et aliis animantibus magnitudo, ei cæteris prominens ori officium, quod proboscidem vulgus appellat; volatili­ bus etiam pennarum officium et apibus aculeum. cunctisque prorsus usum aliquod naturale præsidium constat esse collatum.
nor is his body covered with hair, although it would have been fitting that he who was set forth for the sovereignty over others should be fenced about by natural provision with his own weapons, lest for his own guarding he should need the aids of others. But as it now is, the lion indeed, and the boar, and the tiger, and the leopard, or whatever is like to these, naturally possesses strength sufficient for its own safety; the bull has horns, the hare swiftness, the stag both leaping and a sure gaze, and other living creatures size, and to yet others a projecting member of the mouth, which the common folk call a trunk; to flying things too the office of wings, and to bees a sting; and to absolutely all it is established that some natural means of defence has been conferred for use.
他的身體也不被毛髮所覆蓋,雖然按理那被立來轄管萬物的,本當以天然的供給用自己的武器加以圍護,免得為了自保而需仰賴他者的扶助。但如今,獅子、野豬、老虎、豹,或凡與這些類似的,天然地具有足以自保的力量;牛有角,兔有迅捷,鹿有跳躍與確準的目光,別的活物有龐大的體軀,還有些有突出於口的肢體,俗稱為象鼻;飛禽也有翅膀的功用,蜜蜂有螫刺;確然萬類都被賦予了某種天然的防衛以供使用。
9:31
Solus autem homo præ omni­ bus creditur destitutus, et his qui currendi velocitate proeminent pigrior, illis autem qui corporis eminent mole tenuior, his etiam qui naturalibus armis excel­ lunt despecliir esse cognoscitur. Et quomodo, dicet aliquis, universorum dominus talis sortitus est prin­ cipatum? Sed ad hæc nihil arbitror esse difficile de­ monstrare, per id quod naturæ nostrae deesse credi­ tur, certa datur occasio, qua subditorum omnium dominium consequatur. Nam si hujus esset homo potentiæ, ut equum velocitate superaret, nec pes ejus attereretur, sed ungularum inniteretur firmitate prævalida, cornua quoque vel aculeos aliquos un­ guesque præferret ultores :
But man alone above all is believed to be destitute, and is recognized as slower than those that excel in swiftness of running, slighter than those that stand out in bulk of body, and despised by those too that excel in natural weapons. And how, someone will say, did the lord of all obtain such a sovereignty? But to this I think it is in no way difficult to demonstrate that, through that very thing which is believed to be lacking to our nature, a sure occasion is given whereby he may attain the dominion of all things subject to him. For if man had been of such power that he could surpass the horse in swiftness, and his foot were not worn away but rested upon the prevailing firmness of hooves, and if he bore also horns or certain stings and avenging claws:
惟獨人超乎萬物之上被認為一無所備,並被看出比那些以奔跑迅捷見長的更為遲緩,比那些以身軀龐大著稱的更為瘦弱,甚至被那些以天然武器卓越的所輕看。有人會說:萬有之主怎會領受這樣的主權呢?但對此我認為毫不難證明:正是藉著那被認為是我們本性所缺乏的,反而給了一個確實的契機,使他得以獲得對一切屬下之物的統治。因為人若有這樣的能力,能在迅捷上勝過馬,他的腳不致磨損,卻倚靠蹄甲超強的堅固,並且也長著角或某些螫刺與報復的爪:
9:32
primum quidem bestiis existeret similis, et occursione ipsa difficilis appare­ ret, hujuscemodi corpori ejus adminiculis naturaliter attributis : deinde sperneret in alios exercere domi­ natum quorum nullis prorsus adjutoriis indigeret. Nunc autem in singulis quæ nobis manicipantur usus vitae nostræ dirimitur, ut necessarium in eis penitus principatum haberi videamus; nam corporis nostri tarditas et ad motum celerem difficultas, equorum nobis adhibere providentiam fecit, quin etiam annuis lanarum reditibus ea quæ naturæ deerant suppleme ta prospiciens : ex aliis quoque causis quæ ad vitam necessaria deerant, comprobantur.
first indeed he would be like the beasts, and would appear difficult at the very encounter, such aids being naturally bestowed upon his body; and next he would scorn to exercise dominion over others whose helps he would in no way need. But as it now is, the use of our life is apportioned among the several things that are made over to us, so that we may see that a sovereignty over them is altogether necessary; for the slowness of our body and its difficulty in swift movement made us employ the foresight of horses; and moreover, providing through the yearly returns of wool those supplements that were lacking to nature, and through other resources also are supplied the things necessary to life that were wanting.
那麼,首先他確然會像野獸一般,在相遇之際就顯得難以親近,因這些扶助天然地賦予了他的身體;其次他必輕看去轄管那些他全然不需其扶助的他者。但如今,我們生活的需用被分派在那些交付給我們的各樣事物之上,叫我們得見對它們的統治是斷然必需的;因為我們身體的遲緩與其迅速移動的困難,使我們運用馬匹的供給;而且藉著羊毛每年的出產,供應那本性所缺乏的補給;從其他來源也補足那於生活所必需而原本欠缺之物。
9:33
Jumenta nobis ad onera gravia ferenda subjecta sunt, et quod ad instar animalium herbas depascere nequeamus, bo­ ves nobis ad usum mancipare curavimus, quorum labore victum facilius comparemus. Quia vero morsu indigebamus et dentibus ad cohibendas tales beslias ultione, id quod nobis defuit canum natura supplevit, qui etiam cum velocitate congenita veluti quidam animatus gladius nostris est usibus attributus; pro cornibus etiam vel unguibus fortius ac penetrabilius ferrum ab hominibus inventum est. Quod non sem­ per nobis naturaliter inhaeret, sicut illa munimina irrationabilibus bestiis; sed in tempore belli confe­ rens præsidium gladius deinceps manet otiosus.
Beasts of burden have been made subject to us for carrying heavy loads; and because we cannot graze upon grass after the manner of animals, we have taken care to make oxen serve our use, that by their labour we may more easily procure our food. And because we needed biting and teeth for the restraining and avenging of such beasts, what was lacking to us the nature of dogs supplied, which also, with its inborn swiftness, has been assigned to our uses as a kind of living sword; and in place of horns or claws, iron stronger and more penetrating was invented by men. This does not always cleave to us by nature, as do those defences to the irrational beasts; but, affording protection in time of war, the sword thereafter remains idle.
馱獸被制伏服事我們,以馱負沉重的擔子;又因我們不能像走獸那樣吃草,我們便設法使牛供我們所用,好藉牠們的勞力更易得我們的食物。又因我們需要咬囓與牙齒,以制伏並報復這樣的野獸,我們所缺乏的,狗的天性便補足了,牠連同與生俱來的迅捷,彷彿一把活的刀劍,被分派供我們使用;且代替角或爪,人發明了更堅硬、更銳利的鐵。這鐵並不像那些防衛之物總是天然附於不理性的野獸,而是在戰時提供防護,刀劍此後便閒置無用。
9:34
Item ejusdem ferri usus pro crocodili squamis as­ sumetur. Est autem quando et tergus ipsius belluæ in prælio munimen impertit, alioquin (ut dictum est) ad ejus similitudinem ferrum ab artifice figuratur, quod necessitali deserviens quem armavit in belli tempore, derelinquit in pace. Nec non et volatilia nostris commodata sunt usibus, quorum etiam velo­ citatem ratio excogitata non præterit; nam quædam ex eis mansuefacta videntur coopcrantibus, quædam vero præsentia sui, capiendi causa sunt aliis quae nostris utililatibus applicentur. Sed et pennata tela nobis ars exquisita perfecit, quæ per arcum tensa cursum volucrem rebus humanis exhibuit.
Likewise the use of this same iron is taken up in place of the crocodile's scales. And there are times when the very hide of that beast affords protection in battle; otherwise (as has been said) iron is shaped by the craftsman after its likeness, which, serving necessity by arming a man in time of war, forsakes him in peace. The flying creatures too have been made serviceable to our uses, and their very swiftness has not escaped the ingenuity of reason; for some of them, when tamed, appear to cooperate, while others by their very presence become the means of capturing yet others that are applied to our advantages. But winged darts also a refined art has perfected for us, which, drawn taut by the bow, has rendered a flying course to human affairs.
同樣,這鐵的用處也被取來代替鱷魚的鱗甲。有時那野獸自身的皮在戰陣中也賦予防護;不然(如前所述)工匠便照其形狀鍛造鐵,使其服事需要,在戰時武裝那持鐵之人,卻在平時離棄他。飛禽也被造為對我們的使用有益,其迅捷也未逃過理性的巧思;因為其中有些經馴養後似乎與人合作,有些則藉其臨在,成為捕捉別樣可供我們利用之物的憑藉。但精巧的技藝也為我們造成了帶翅的箭矢,藉弓拉緊,為人事提供了飛馳的奔程。
9:35
Quod au­ tem pedum nostrorum vestigia ad conficiendum iter facilius atteruntur, necessaria subjectorum admini­ cnla nobis indicunt ex quibus calceamenta congruen­ ter aptentur. CAPUT VIII. Cur hominis rectus sit habitus, et quam propter ratio­ nem manus datæ sunt, in quo quædum et de diffe­ rentiis animarum disputatio naturæ inducitur. Quod vero rectus cst hominis habitus et ad coelum sese sustollens sursumque respicicus, principalia hæc dona esse certissimum cst, approbantia regiam potestatem. Denique quod solus ita formatus esi, caeterorumque omnium prona sint corpora, et in deorsum proclivius inclinata, manifesta differentia honoris ejus ostenditur :
And as for the fact that the soles of our feet are too easily worn down for the completing of a journey, this enjoins upon us the necessary aids of the things subject to us, from which footwear may be fittingly fashioned. CHAPTER VIII. Why man's posture is upright, and for what reason hands have been given, in which also a certain discussion concerning the differences of the souls of nature is introduced. But that man's posture is upright and lifts itself toward heaven and looks upward, it is most certain that these are principal gifts, attesting his royal power. Finally, that he alone has been so formed, while the bodies of all the rest are prone and inclined more downwardly, a manifest difference of his honour is shown:
至於我們腳掌在完成路程時太易磨損,這便向我們指示了那些屬下之物的必需扶助,可從中合宜地製成鞋履。第八章 論為何人的姿勢是端正的,以及為何賜下雙手,其中也引入關於本性諸魂之差異的某種討論。然而人的姿勢端正、向天昂舉、向上仰望,這實在最為確定乃是首要的恩賜,證實他君王的權柄。末了,惟獨他被造成如此,而其餘一切的身軀都俯伏、更朝下傾斜,他尊榮的顯著差異便由此顯明:
9:36
dum constet illa quidem hujus esse subjecta potentiae, hunc autem super­ eminentis existeredignitatis. Nam aliis quidem omni­ bus anteriora membra corporis pedes sunt, quia quod acclive est, egebat profecto firmitatis adnisu. In hominis autem conditione haec membra manus effecta sunt, quia rectiludine habitus ejus unus gres­ sus videbatur esse sufficiens, qui geminis pedibus standi constantiam cauta provisione firmaret. Alias quoque ad usum rationis officia manus aptata sunt, et si quis rationali naturæ ministerium manuum pro­ prium qui3 esse dixerit, minime delinquet.
since it is established that the one is subject to this power, while the other exists as of pre-eminent dignity. For in all the others the foremost members of the body are the feet, because what is sloping forward needed assuredly the support of firmness. But in the constitution of man these members have been made hands, because by the uprightness of his posture a single step seemed to be sufficient, which by a careful provision should establish the steadfastness of standing upon a pair of feet. The hands too have been fitted for other purposes, for the use of reason; and if anyone should say that the service of the hands is proper to the rational nature, he would by no means err.
既然確定一者是順服於這權柄之下,另一者卻是具有超卓的尊嚴而存在。因為在其餘一切之中,身體最前面的肢體乃是腳,因為那向前傾斜的,確然需要堅固的支撐。但在人的構造中,這些肢體卻成了手,因為由於他姿勢的端正,單一的步態似乎已足夠,並藉謹慎的安排,以一雙腳穩固站立的恆定。雙手也被配置用於其他用途,即理性的運用;若有人說手的服事乃是理性本性所專有的,他斷不會有錯。
9:37
Non so- tum enim ad hoc quod commune et promptum est intelligentiae nostrae respicio, quod scilicet verba lit­ teris manus administratione signamus, et quidem nec ista gratia rationalis impar est dignitatis, quod litte­ ris loqui quoque possumus et modo quodam manibus disputamus in elementorum figuris nostrum repo­ nentes eloquium. Sed ego ad alia prorsus intendens, studio quodam cooperationis obtemperare manus affirmo rationis imperio. Verum antequam hoc idem discutiamus, effusius rationem magis quam praeter­ misimus, inquiramus. Pene namque factorum nos ordo, et causa latuit cujus rei gratia praecedant.
For I look not only to that which is common and ready to our understanding, namely that we mark words in letters by the ministry of the hand—and indeed even this is no grace unequal to the rational dignity, that we are able also to speak by letters and in a certain manner to converse with the hands, reposing our utterance in the figures of the elements. But I, intending something quite other, affirm that the hands obey the command of reason by a certain zeal of cooperation. Yet before we examine this same matter, let us inquire more at large into the reason which we have rather passed over. For almost the order of the things made, and the cause for the sake of which they precede, has lain hidden from us.
因為我所注目的不僅是那於我們的悟性而言為共通且現成的,即我們藉手的服事把言語標記為文字——而且這甚至也不是一種不及理性尊嚴的恩典,即我們也能用文字說話,並以某種方式用雙手談論,把我們的言詞安置在字母的形狀之中。但我所意在的,乃是另一回事:我要肯定,雙手以某種合作的熱誠順從理性的命令。然而在我們考究這同一件事之先,讓我們更廣泛地探究那我們寧可略過的理由。因為事物受造的次序,以及它們先後排列所為的緣由,幾乎都向我們隱藏了。
9:38
Germinent terrae virentia, dehinc irrationabilia sub­ sequantur animalia, et ita post horum conditionem loco tertio homo formetur. Fortassis enim per haec non tantum ea quae sunt manifesta sentimus, quod propter jumenta vel maxime Conditor universitatis instituerit herbarum naturam, propter homines au­ tem jumenta creaverit. Unde et ante greges pabula, ante hominem vero quae humanae vitæ possent admi­ nicula præbere, produxerit. Sed mihi videtur conse­ quentia bujus eloquii aliquod dogma de absconditis intimare. Sic enim Moses de statu animae divino im­ perio philosophiæ reservavit arcanum, de qua re quidem et eruditio extera sibimet imaginata est ali­ quid;
Let the earth bring forth green things, then let the irrational animals follow after, and so, after the creation of these, in the third place let man be formed. For perhaps by these things we perceive not only those which are manifest, namely that for the sake of the beasts above all the Creator of the universe established the nature of herbs, and for the sake of men created the beasts. Whence too He brought forth before the flocks their pasturage, and before man those things which could afford the aids of human life. But to me it seems that the sequence of this discourse intimates some doctrine concerning hidden things. For thus Moses, by divine command, reserved as a mystery for philosophy the account of the state of the soul, concerning which indeed even external learning has imagined something for itself;
願地長出青翠之物,其次願不理性的走獸隨後而出,如此在這些受造之後,第三位才造成人。因為或許藉這些事我們不僅察覺那些顯明的,即萬有的創造者尤其為了走獸而設立了草木的本性,又為了人而造了走獸。因此祂在羊群之先生出牠們的草場,在人之先生出那能供人生命扶助之物。但我認為這話語的次序暗示出某種關乎隱秘之事的教義。因為摩西如此奉神聖的命令,把魂之狀態的記述當作奧秘留給哲學,關於此事連外邦的學問也曾為自己臆想出某些東西;
9:39
sed non clare quæ crant videnda perspexit. Per haec ergo, ut arbitror, ipsa ratio docet quod in tribus differentiis vitalis haec atque animalis potentia declaretur. Herbarum siquidem natura incrementis est tantum et nutrimentis accommoda, congruum præbens his qui ex ea paventur augmentum, quæ et germinabilis dicitur, eademque in virgultis et arbo­ rihus substantia pervidctur. Est autem in bis ipsis quæ germinantur vitalis quædam potentia, sensus animatione privata.
but it did not clearly discern the things that were to be seen. By these things, therefore, as I judge, reason itself teaches that this vital and animal power is declared in three differences. For the nature of herbs is adapted only to growth and to nourishment, affording fitting increase to those that are fed by it; it is also called the germinative, and the same substance is perceived in shrubs and trees. But there is in these very things that germinate a certain vital power, deprived of the animation of sense.
但它沒有清楚看見那當見之事。所以,我認為,藉這些事,理性本身教導我們:這活潑而有生命的能力是在三種差異中被宣告的。因為草木的本性只適於生長與滋養,給那些靠它養活之物供應合宜的增長;它也被稱為發芽性的,在灌木與樹木中也見有同一的本質。但在這些發芽之物本身裡面,有某種活潑的能力,卻沒有感覺的生命。
9:40
Praeter hanc vero est et alia vitæ species, cui Creator et incrementa contulit, et dispen­ sandam sensibus imperavit, quam in natura irratio­ nabilium facile contuemur, quae non solum ut herba crescens nutritur e nutrit, sed etiam sensibilem vim possidere cognoscitur. Perfecta vero tertia vita corporis in hominis essentia rationali constituta est quae et nutritur et nutrit et sentit, et rationis parti cipans mente vegetatur. Debemus autem scire, quo talis quaedam eorum quæ sunt ratio divisioni exi stat, ut aliud intellectuale sit, aliud corporale. Se intellectualis essentiæ nunc omittatur in sua proprie­ tate divisio. Nec enim nobis est de hac re sermonis occasio.
But besides this there is yet another kind of life, to which the Creator both conferred increase and commanded that it be dispensed by the senses, which we readily behold in the nature of the irrational creatures, which not only, like a growing herb, is nourished and nourishes, but is also recognized to possess a sentient power. But the perfect, third life of the body has been constituted in the rational essence of man, which both is nourished and nourishes and feels, and, partaking of reason, is quickened by mind. We ought, however, to know that there exists a certain division of the things that are according to such a reckoning, so that one part is intellectual, another corporeal. But let the division of the intellectual essence in its own property be now passed over; for we have no occasion of discourse upon this matter.
但除此之外,還有另一種生命,造物主既賜給它增長,又命定它藉感官施行運作,我們在不理性受造之物的本性中容易見到它;這生命不僅像生長的草木那樣被養育並養育他物,還被認出具有感覺的能力。但身體完全的第三種生命,則設立於人理性的本質之中,它既被養育、又養育、又有感覺,且因分受理性,被心智所活化。然而我們當知道,凡存在之物按這樣的理路有某種劃分,以致一部分是屬靈智的,另一部分是屬身體的。但靈智本質在其本身屬性中的劃分,如今且擱置不論;因為我們在此事上沒有論說的機會。
9:41
Corporalis autem substantiæ aliud est om­ nino sine vita , aliud vitæ participat : rursus vi­ talis corporalis alia sunt sensibilia, alia vero sensu carentia, ut sunt etiam capilli nostri et ungues. Item sensibilia in naturis rationabilium et irrationabiliuin dividuntur. Propterea posl exanimem materiam pri­ mum velut crepidinem quamdam hanc germinalem substantiam legislator expressit : deinceps eorum generationem quae sensibus tantummodo continentur, aperuit. Et quia secundum istam consequentiam ea quæ vitam in carne sortita sunt, sensibilia qui­ dem sine intelligibilibus per se subsislere videntur, rationalis autem substantia non potest in alio nisi sensibili corpore contueri;
But of corporeal substance, one part is altogether without life, another partakes of life: again, of the vital corporeal things, some are sentient, others lacking sense, as are also our hairs and nails. Likewise the sentient things are divided into the natures of the rational and the irrational. Therefore, after inanimate matter, the lawgiver first set forth, as a kind of foundation, this germinative substance; thereafter he disclosed the generation of those things which are contained by the senses alone. And because, according to this sequence, those things which have obtained life in the flesh, the sentient indeed, are seen to subsist of themselves apart from the intelligible, while the rational substance cannot be beheld in any other than a sentient body;
但屬身體的本質,有一部分全然無生命,另一部分分受生命:再者,在有生命的身體之物中,有些是有感覺的,有些是無感覺的,正如我們的毛髮與指甲。同樣,有感覺之物又分為理性與不理性的本性。因此,在無生氣的物質之後,立法者首先彷彿立了某種根基,陳明這發芽的本質;繼而揭示那些單單由感官所涵蓋之物的生成。又因按這次序,那些在肉體中得了生命之物——即有感覺的——似乎是離了可悟之物而自存,而理性的本質卻除了在有感覺的身體中,別無可見;
9:42
idcirco post germina atque jumenta factus est homo, via quadam conse­ quenter ad perfectionem natura perficiens. Omnium namque specierum, id est, et crescentis germinis et sensualis animantis hoc rationale anima! homo parti­ cipat. Nutritur enim juxta naturalem substantiam animae qualitas, incrementi vero vim sensuali submi­ nistratione sortitur, quae juxta quemdam modum suum inter iutellectualem et materialem substantiam in medio collocata, quantum illius comparatione crassior, tantum ejus prælatione videtur esse sinoe­ nor.
therefore after the germinative things and the beasts, man was made, nature, by a certain way, advancing in sequence toward perfection. For of all the kinds—that is, both of the growing germination and of the sentient living creature—man, this rational animal, partakes. For the quality of the soul is nourished according to its natural substance, but obtains the power of increase by the sentient administration; which, according to a certain mode of its own, being placed midway between the intellectual and the material substance, in proportion as it is coarser by comparison with the former, is by so much seen to be purer by its precedence over the latter.
所以在發芽之物與走獸之後,人才被造成,本性藉某種途徑循序向著完全前進。因為一切種類——即生長的發芽之物與有感覺的活物——人,這理性的活物,都有分。因為魂的性質按其天然的本質被養育,卻藉有感覺的施行得著增長的能力;這能力按其自有的某種方式,被置於靈智本質與物質本質之間的中間地位,正如它與前者相比顯得較粗,照樣它因高於後者而顯得較為純淨。
9:43
Deinde sensibilis rei quod est subtilissimum et lucidissimum intellectuali sociatum fit quaedam na­ turæ permixtio conveniens, ita ut iD tribus istis vi­ deatur homo subsistere. Na:n et Apostolum tale ali- quid cognoscimus intiinare, ubi pro Thessalonicensi- bus orans ait: Ipse autem Deus pacis sanctificet vos per omnia, ut integer spiritus vester et anima et corpus sine querela in adventum Domini nostri Jesu Christi servetur : pro nutribili parte corpus, pro sensibili animam, pro intellectuali spiritum ponens. Similiter et scribam in Evangelio Dominus instruens omni mandato dilectionem Domini præponit, quæ ex toto eorde et ex tota anima et ex toto intellectu perfici­ tur.
Then that which is most subtle and most luminous in the sentient thing, being joined to the intellectual, becomes a certain fitting commingling of nature, so that man is seen to subsist in these three. For we know that the Apostle too intimates some such thing, where, praying for the Thessalonians, he says: And may the very God of peace sanctify you wholly, that your whole spirit and soul and body may be preserved without complaint unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ: placing the body for the nutritive part, the soul for the sentient, the spirit for the intellectual. Likewise the Lord too, in the Gospel, instructing the scribe, sets the love of the Lord before every commandment, which is fulfilled with the whole heart and with the whole soul and with the whole mind.
於是,那在有感覺之物中最為精微、最為明亮的,與靈智之物相連,便成為本性某種合宜的交融,以致人被看為存在於這三者之中。因為我們知道使徒也暗示某種這樣的事,他為帖撒羅尼迦人禱告時說:願賜平安的神親自使你們全然成聖,又願你們的靈與魂與身子得蒙保守,在我們主耶穌基督降臨的時候完全無可指摘:他以身子指那滋養的部分,以魂指有感覺的,以靈指靈智的。同樣,主在福音書中教導那文士時,也把愛主放在一切誡命之先,這愛是要盡心、盡性、盡意去成全的。
9:44
Nam et in præsenti eamdem mihi sermo diffe­ rentiam videtur interpretationis offerre. Corpulen­ tiorem quidem efficaciam cor appellans, animam vero mediam sedem tenere significans. Intellectum autem sublimiorem substantiam rationabilis insi­ nuans perspicabilisque virtutis. Unde et tres distan- tias voluntatum novit Apostolus : carnalem, quæ circa ventrem et inferiores partes voluptatibus tan­ tum vitiosis oblequitur; animalem vero, quæ media inter virtutem malitiamque versatur, hanc quidem supergrediens, illius autem nequaquam particeps sin­ ceritatis existens et spiritalitatem Deo placitæ con­ versationis assequitur.
For in the present passage too the discourse seems to me to offer this same difference of interpretation: calling the heart the more corporeal efficacy, signifying the soul to hold the middle seat, and intimating the mind to be the loftier substance of the rational and perspicacious power. Whence the Apostle too knows three distances of the wills: the carnal, which is enslaved only to the vicious pleasures concerning the belly and the lower parts; the animal, which is engaged midway between virtue and malice, surpassing the latter indeed but in no way partaking of the sincerity of the former; and the spiritual, which attains the spirituality of a manner of life pleasing to God.
因為在當前這段話中,這論述於我看來也提供了同樣的解釋差異:把心稱為較屬身體的效力,表明魂居中間的座位,並暗示心智乃是理性而透徹之能力的更高超的本質。因此,使徒也知道意志的三種等次:屬肉體的,只受制於那關乎肚腹與下體諸般惡欲的卑下情慾;屬血氣的,處於德行與邪惡之間的中間,固然勝過後者,卻全不分受前者的純全;以及屬靈的,得著合神心意之生活樣式的屬靈性。
9:45
Sic enim scribens ad Corin­ thios exprobraft eis studium voluptariæviæ atque possibilis, dicens : Nonne carnales estis, et secundum hominem ambulatis, id est, perfectioribus doctrinis incapaces esse probamini. Et alibi comparationem quamdam mediæ hujus ad illam celsiorem perfectio- remque faciens, dicit : Animalis. autem homo non per­ cipit ea quæ sunt spiritus Dei. Stultilia enim est illi et non potest intelliegere, quia spiritaliter examina- tur; spiritalis autem judicat omnia, Ipse autem a nemine judicatur. Denique sicut carnali animalis su­ peremmet juxta eamdem mensuram anuualem quo­ que spiritalis excellil.
For thus, writing to the Corinthians, he reproaches them with their pursuit of the way of pleasure and of the possible, saying: Are you not carnal, and do you not walk according to man? that is, you are proved incapable of the more perfect teachings. And elsewhere, making a certain comparison of this middle way to that loftier and more perfect one, he says: But the animal man perceives not the things that are of the Spirit of God. For it is foolishness to him, and he cannot understand, because it is spiritually examined; but the spiritual man judges all things, and he himself is judged by no one. Finally, just as the animal surpasses the carnal, so by the same measure the spiritual also excels the animal.
因為保羅如此寫信給哥林多人,責備他們追求享樂與可行之路,說:你們豈不是屬肉體的,豈不是照著世人而行麼?就是說,你們被證明不能領受更完全的教訓。在別處,他把這中間之路與那更高超、更完全之路作某種比較,說:然而屬血氣的人不領受神聖靈的事。因為這些事於他是愚拙,他也不能明白,因為這些事惟有屬靈地才得參透;惟有屬靈的人能看透萬事,他自己卻不被人看透。末了,正如屬血氣的勝過屬肉體的,照樣屬靈的也按同樣的尺度超越屬血氣的。
9:46
Quod ergo novissimum post omnia factum hominem Scriptura commemorat, ni­ hil aliud quam de statu animæ philosophari nos de­ bere latenter informat, necessaria quædam rerum consequentia, id quidem perfectum in postremis in­ sinuans. Natura namque rationalis cætera quoque continet et incrementa germinis, et sensus animantis, natura etiam sensibilis germinalem speciem sine du­ bilatione complectitur. Hæc autem propter quod immaterialis est se sola complectitur. Consequenter igitur natura veluti per quosdam gradus, vite dico proprietatum, ab inferioribus ad perfectiora con- scendit. CAPUT IX. Quod aptissima hominis habitudo ad opt' rationis con­ structa sit.
That, therefore, Scripture records man to have been made last after all things, secretly informs us that we ought to philosophize on nothing else than the state of the soul, by a certain necessary consequence of things, intimating indeed that perfect thing to come among the last. For the rational nature contains the others also, both the increase of germination and the sense of the living creature; the sentient nature too embraces, without doubt, the germinative kind. But this latter, because it is immaterial, embraces itself alone. Consequently, therefore, nature, as it were by certain steps—I mean of the properties of life—ascends from the lower to the more perfect. CHAPTER IX. That the constitution of man has been most aptly framed for the work of reason.
所以,聖經記載人是在萬物之後最末被造,這隱秘地告訴我們:我們不該對別的,只該對魂之狀態加以哲學的省思,藉某種必然的事物次序,確然暗示那完全之物要在最末出現。因為理性的本性也涵蓋其餘一切,既包括發芽之物的增長,又包括活物的感覺;有感覺的本性也無疑地包括發芽的種類。但這後者,因它是非物質的,只包括它自己。所以,本性彷彿藉某些階梯——我是說生命諸屬性的階梯——從較低的上升到較完全的。第九章 論人的構造是最為合宜地為理性的運作而建立的。
9:47
Quia igitur rationale animai homo, oporlebat ni­ sui rationis conveniens institui corporis instrumen­ tum. Sicut enim videmus musicæ peritissimos juxta organi speciem studium modulaminis exercere, et neque tubicinare barbitum nervis, neque citharizare tubicines : juxta hunc modum instrumentorum eon­ structionem oportebat esse rationi consentientem : ita ut aptissime posset ad usum resonare sermonis, qui vocaLium membrorum formaretur officiis.
Since, therefore, man is a rational animal, it behoved that an instrument of the body conformable to the use of reason should be instituted. For just as we see those most skilled in music exercise their practice of melody according to the kind of instrument, and that the lyre is not played with the strings of the trumpet, nor the trumpets sounded as one harps: after this manner the construction of the instruments had to be consonant with reason, so that it might most aptly be able to resound to the use of speech, which is formed by the offices of the vocal members.
因此,既然人是理性的活物,理當設立一個與理性運用相合的身體器官。因為正如我們看見那些最精於音樂的人,按樂器的種類來操練其曲調的技藝,既不用號角的弦來奏豎琴,也不像彈豎琴那樣吹號:照這樣式,諸器官的構造也當與理性相合,以致最為合宜地能為言語的運用發聲,這言語是由發聲諸肢體的功用所構成的。
9:48
Ideo autem manus coaptatae sunt corpori, et quamvis uti­ litates mille vitæ hujus enumerare facillimum eat, quas hæc opportuna et durabilia manuum instrn­ menta naviter administrent, omnem artem omnem­ que operationem bello et pace competenter explentia, tamen prae aliis omnibus rationis causa manus cor­ pori natura congruenter apposuit. Nam si homo sine manibus exstitisset, profecto percipiendorum ciborum necessitate membra vultus ejus ad instar quadrupe­ dum formarentur, ita ut oblonga facies tenuaretur, simulet emineret in naribus, oris etiam labia callosa et grossiora essent atque firmissima;
For this reason hands have been fitted to the body; and although it would be most easy to enumerate a thousand uses of this present life which these opportune and durable instruments of the hands diligently administer, fulfilling fittingly every art and every operation in war and peace, nevertheless above all others it is for the sake of reason that nature fittingly set the hands upon the body. For if man had existed without hands, assuredly, by the necessity of taking in food, the members of his face would have been formed after the fashion of quadrupeds, so that his face would have been drawn out long and would have projected in the nostrils, and the lips of his mouth would have been callous and thicker and most firm;
因這緣故,雙手被配置於身體;雖然要列舉這雙手既合時宜又耐久的器官所殷勤施行的、今生的千般用處乃是極其容易的——這些手恰當地成就戰時與平時的一切技藝與一切運作——然而,本性把雙手合宜地安在身體上,首要乃是為了理性的緣故。因為人若沒有雙手而存在,則必因攝取食物的必需,他臉部的肢體會照四足獸的樣式被造成,以致面孔被拉長變窄,並在鼻孔處突出,口唇也會變得粗厚堅硬;
9:49
et ad carpen­ das herbas competenter aptata, nec non et lingua grandiori corpore durior esset et asperior, quæ coo­ peraretur dentibus, ad ea quae mandenda perciperet liquidior existens, et juxta utrumque latus effusior qualis est canum et cæterorum quæ vescuntur car- nibus, per aspera dentium intervalla discurrens. Si ergo manus non adessent corpori, quomodo ei vox articulata figuraretur, cum talis oris ejus formatio ad usum sermonis minime conveniret, ita ut necesse esset hominem vel balatus emittere, vel latratus, aut ut equus hinniret, aut vocem daret bubus asinisque consimilem, aut aliquem rugitum promeret bestia­ lem.
and fitted for plucking grass, and the tongue too would be harder and rougher, of a larger body, that it might cooperate with the teeth, being more fluid for the things it should take in to be chewed, and on either side more spread out, such as is that of dogs and of the others that feed on flesh, coursing through the rough intervals of the teeth. If, therefore, hands were not present to the body, how could an articulate voice be shaped for it, since such a formation of his mouth would by no means be suited to the use of speech, so that it would be necessary for man either to emit bleatings, or barkings, or to neigh like a horse, or to give a voice similar to oxen and asses, or to bring forth some bestial roar?
且適於採摘青草,舌頭也會更硬更粗、體軀更大,以便與牙齒配合,為它所攝取要咀嚼之物而更為靈活,並在兩側更為展開,如同狗與其他吃肉之物的舌頭,在牙齒粗糙的間隙中遊走。所以,雙手若不存在於身體,清晰的話音怎能為它而成形呢?既然他口的這種構造斷不適於言語的運用,以致人勢必或發出咩叫,或吠聲,或像馬嘶鳴,或發出與牛驢相似的聲音,或發出某種野獸般的吼叫?
9:50
Nunc autem manus accommodatae sunt corpori- ut os ad ministerium verbi liberum permaneret; ergo proprium quiddam est naturæ rationali habere ma­ nus in corpore, ila ut per eas omnium Conditore fa­ cultatem conccdentc sermonis. Cum ergo divinum quemnam gratiæ principatum imaginisve contulit Dcus, ct bonorum suorum munera rationali figmento contribuit, propterca rcliqua quidem bona humanæ naturæ pia liberalitate 'largius cst, mentem vero et intelligentiam, non est proprie dicere quia dedit, sed quia contulit proprium naturæ suae decus, imagini deferens.
But as it now is, the hands have been accommodated to the body, so that the mouth might remain free for the ministry of the word; therefore it is something proper to the rational nature to have hands upon the body, in such wise that, the Creator of all granting the faculty, through them comes the office of speech. When, therefore, God conferred some divine sovereignty of grace or of the image, and bestowed the gifts of His good things upon the rational creature, on that account He indeed gave the remaining good things to human nature with a pious liberality more abundantly; but as for mind and understanding, it is not proper to say that He gave them, but that He conferred the glory proper to His own nature, bestowing it upon the image.
但如今,雙手已配合身體,好叫口能保持自由,以服事言語;因此,在身體上有雙手乃是理性本性所專有的,如此,藉著萬有的創造者所賜的能力,言語的功用便藉雙手而來。所以,神既賜下某種神聖的、屬恩典或屬形象的主權,並把祂諸般美善的恩賜賜給理性的受造之物,因此祂固然以虔誠的慷慨更豐盛地把其餘的美善賜給人的本性;但至於心智與悟性,說祂「賜下」是不恰當的,當說祂「分予」了祂自己本性所專有的榮耀,將之授予那形象。
9:51
Ergo quia mens rnteliigibilis quaedam et in­ corporea res est, incommunicabilem quodammodo possideret gratiam, nisi motus operationis suae aliqui­ bus excogitationibus intimaret. Hujus rei gratia hac indiguit constructione membrorum ut in modum plectri vocabilia instrumenta contingens, per qualita­ tem sonituum motum interpretaretur internum. Et quemadmodum si quis musica imbutus arte, pro­ priam vocem aliqua passione non habeat, volensque suam manifestam facere disciplinam, alienis vocibus aemuletur, publicans artem lyra vel tibia:
Therefore, since the mind is a certain intelligible and incorporeal thing, it would in some way possess an incommunicable grace, unless it intimated the motions of its operation by certain devices. For the sake of this it needed this construction of members, so that, touching the vocal instruments after the manner of a plectrum, it might interpret its internal motion by the quality of sounds. And just as if someone imbued with the art of music should not, by some affliction, have his own voice, and, wishing to make his discipline manifest, should emulate it by alien voices, publishing his art by lyre or pipe:
因此,既然心智是某種可悟的、非物質的東西,它就會在某種意義上具有一種無法傳遞的恩典,除非它藉某些工具表達其運作的動向。為此緣故它需要肢體的這種構造,以致它彷彿用撥子觸碰那發聲的器官,藉聲音的性質詮釋其內在的動向。正如有人若諳熟音樂的技藝,卻因某種病患而沒有自己的嗓音,他想要使自己的造詣顯明,便藉外來的聲音來摹仿,用豎琴或笛子展示其技藝:
9:52
sic humana mens cum omnimodorum intellectuum probetur in- ventrix, nec possit nuda anima his quæ per sensus corporis audiant, impetus suæ intelligentiæ declarare, quasi per modulationem quamdam hæc artificiosius animata instrumenta contingens, eorum sonis intel­ ligentiæ suæ occulta manifestat. Mixtam vero variam­ que hanc musicam instrumentis humanorum possu­ mus considerare membrorum : quæ velut lyra et tibia concentu quodam idipsum sibi invicem resonant.
so the human mind, although it is proved to be the inventor of intellections of every kind, and the bare soul cannot declare the impulses of its understanding to those who hear through the senses of the body, touching as it were by a certain modulation these instruments more artfully endowed with life, by their sounds manifests the hidden things of its understanding. And we can consider this mingled and varied music in the instruments of the human members, which, as it were a lyre and a pipe, resound the very same thing to one another by a certain harmony.
照樣,人的心智雖被證為各樣理解的發明者,而赤裸的魂卻不能向那些藉身體感官聽見的人表明其悟性的衝動,它便彷彿藉某種調音,觸碰這些更巧妙地賦有生命的器官,藉它們的聲音顯明其悟性所隱藏的事。我們也可以在人體諸肢體這些器官中,思想這混合而多樣的樂音,它們彷彿豎琴與笛子,藉某種協調彼此奏響同一個音。
9:53
Nam vas illud quod recepit spiritum, si quando pulsatur loquentis impetu, et in vocem formaverit eam partem quæ repercutitur internis accessibus, rotunditates illæ quae ad instar tibiarum factæ sunt, imitantur profecto illam vocem, quæ profertur ex tibiis, quas in circuitu membranulæ prominentes exagitant. Su­ perius vero paulatim concavum de inferioribus so­ num recipiens, et geminis fistulis ad nares usque pertingens, vocem erga colatorii loca disrumpit, ma­ joresque sonitus efficit; maxillarum quoque et lin­ guæ fauciumque mira formatio, juxta quae mentum leni fluxu deductum per speciem rotunditatis acuitur.
For that vessel which receives the breath, whenever it is struck by the impulse of one speaking, and has formed into voice that part which is rebounded by the inner passages, those rounded parts which have been made after the fashion of pipes assuredly imitate that voice which is uttered from pipes, which the membranes projecting round about set in motion. But the cavity above, gradually receiving the sound from the lower parts, and reaching by twin tubes as far as the nostrils, breaks the voice about the places of the strainer, and produces greater sounds; and there is too the wondrous formation of the jaws and tongue and throat, in keeping with which the chin, drawn down by a gentle flow, is sharpened into a rounded shape.
因為那承受氣息的器皿,每當被說話者的衝力擊動,並把那由內部通道反彈回來的部分形成聲音時,那些照笛管樣式所造的圓形部分,確然摹仿那從笛管所發的聲音,就是那環繞突出的薄膜所激動的聲音。但上方的腔室,漸漸從下部承受聲音,藉一雙管道直達鼻孔,在濾口諸處將聲音分散,並發出更大的聲響;頷、舌與咽喉也有奇妙的構造,與之相應,下頷藉柔緩的伸展被牽引,削成圓形之狀。
9:54
Hæc autem omnia motum videntur similare nervorum, quae oMens (ut sædictum est ) plectri vice contin­ gens, varie atque multipliciter in suo tempore prout opus exegerit, modos nimia velocitate componit: labiorum vero adaperlio atque conclusio idipsum fa­ cit, quod digiti qui spiritum tibiæjuxta consonantiam modulationis assumit, scitaque mens per haec instru­ menta membrorum rationem modulatur in nobis, per quam etiam rationales probamur effecti, nequa­ quam, ut arbitror, habentes rationis gratiam. Sine hoc casu grave laboriosumque servitium corporis usibus tantummodo labiorum acquirere cogeremur.
But all these things seem to resemble the motion of strings, which the mouth (as has been said), touching in the stead of a plectrum, composes the modes with exceeding swiftness, variously and manifoldly in its season, according as the work shall demand: while the opening and closing of the lips does the very same thing which the fingers do that take the breath of the pipe according to the consonance of the modulation; and the discerning mind, through these instruments of the members, modulates reason in us, by which also we are proved to be made rational—not, as I think, in any way otherwise possessing the grace of reason. Without this provision we should be compelled to procure a grievous and laborious servitude only by the uses of the lips for the body.
但這一切似乎都類似於琴弦的運動,口(如前所述)代替撥子觸碰它們,按工作所要求的,在其時節以極大的迅捷、多樣而繁複地構成各樣調式:而唇的開合所作的,正與那按曲調的協和承接笛管氣息的手指所作相同;那有辨識力的心智,藉這些肢體的器官在我們裡面奏出理性,我們也藉此被證為受造為理性的——我想,我們斷不能以別樣方式擁有理性的恩典。若無此安排,我們便不得不單藉唇對身體的運用,去換取一種沉重而勞苦的奴役。
9:55
Nunc autem manus in se hoc officium transferentes os liberum ad sermonis ministerium reliquerunt. CAPUT X. Quod per sensus meus operetur. Duplex autem hujus instrumenti considcretur ef­ fectus. Aliud enim ejus operatur eloquium, aliud vero vacat ad suscipiendas intelligentias quæ extrin­ secus veniunt, nec alterum miscetur alteri, sed im­ plet operalionem quam natura constituit, nullam af­ ferens vicino molestiam. Nam nec auditus loquitur, nec vox audit. Hæc enim semper aliquid promit, au­ ditus autem suscipiens jugitcr non adimpletur.
But as it now is, the hands, transferring this office to themselves, have left the mouth free for the ministry of speech. CHAPTER X. That through the senses the mind operates. But let a twofold effect of this instrument be considered. For one part of it works speech, while another is at leisure to receive the intelligences that come from without; nor is the one mingled with the other, but each fulfils the operation which nature has constituted, bringing no trouble to its neighbour. For neither does the hearing speak, nor does the voice hear. For this latter always brings forth something, while the hearing, ever receiving, is not filled up.
但如今,雙手把這功用移歸自己,便讓口得以自由,以服事言語。第十章 論心智藉感官運作。但讓我們思想這器官雙重的效用。因為它的一部分作言語的工,另一部分卻閒著去承受那從外面而來的諸般理解;一者不與另一者相混,而是各自成就本性所定的運作,毫不給鄰者添煩擾。因為聽覺不說話,聲音也不聽。因為這後者總是發出些什麼,而聽覺卻一直承受,不被充滿。
9:56
Sicut Salomon quodam loco testatus est quod etiam mihi videtur esse vel maxime prae omnibusque in nobis subadmiratione dignissimum, quae sit latitudo illa capacitatis intrinsecus, in quam cuncta confluunt quæ funduntur auditu, qui sunt illi memoriales qui 'introeuntium sensuum monumenta conscribunt, quam ampla susceptoria intelligentiarum, quæ per aures reponuntur interius, et quomodo cum et mul­ tiplicia sint quae supponantur alterutrum, confusio tamen et error juxta propriam positionem eorum quae inferuntur omnino non gignitur. Similiter etiam ef­ ficaciam visus quis poterit æstimare?
As Solomon in a certain place has testified—which also to me seems to be especially, above all the things in us, most worthy of admiration—how great is that breadth of capacity within, into which flow together all the things that are poured in by hearing; who are those recorders that inscribe the memorials of the senses that enter in; how ample are the receptacles of the intelligences, which are stored up within through the ears; and how, although the things that are placed therein are both many and manifold, yet no confusion or error at all is engendered with regard to the proper position of the things that are brought in. Likewise too, who could estimate the efficacy of sight?
正如所羅門在某處所見證的——這在我看來,超乎我們裡面一切之上,尤其最配得驚嘆——那內在容量的廣闊何其浩大,一切藉聽覺所注入之物都匯流於其中;那些登錄進入諸感官之記憶的記錄者是誰;那藉耳朵存於內裡的諸般理解的容器何其寬廣;以及,雖然安置於其中之物既多且雜,然而對於所引入之物各自的位置,卻全然不生混亂或差錯。同樣,誰又能估量視覺的功效呢?
9:57
Æque enim per oculos mens ea quae extra corpus sunt apprehendit, et in se similitudines apparentium pertrahit, figuras similium sibi ipsa describens. Et quemadmodum si qua civitas multitudinis capax quae diversis aditibus ad se recipit confluentes, non tamen in unum civita­ tis locum universi conveniunt: sed alii quidem ad forum, alii ad habitacula sua, alii ad ecclesias et plateas, juxta suam quisque sententiam properant; talem quodammodo etiam mentis nostræ considerer civitatem interius constitutam, quam licet sensus nostri diversis aditibus impleant. tamen singula in­ troeuntium genera mens eadem dijudicans atque dis­ cernens, locis intelligentiae congruis universa dispo­ nit.
For equally through the eyes the mind apprehends those things which are outside the body, and draws into itself the likenesses of the things appearing, describing for itself the figures of the things like to them. And just as if some city capable of holding a multitude receives those flowing in by diverse entrances, yet not all assemble into one place of the city, but some hasten to the forum, others to their dwellings, others to the churches and the squares, each according to his own purpose: in some such way let one consider also the city of our mind constituted within, which, though our senses fill it by diverse entrances, yet the same mind, judging and discerning each kind of those entering in, disposes all things in the places fitting for understanding.
因為心智同樣藉眼睛把那些在身體之外之物攬取過來,把所顯現之物的肖像引入自身,為自己描繪出與它們相似之物的形狀。正如某座能容眾人的城,從各樣不同的入口接納那些湧入之人,然而眾人並不都聚集到城中的同一處,而是有的趕往市集,有的往自己的住所,有的往教會與廣場,各按自己的心意:就請以某種這樣的方式,來思想我們心智在內裡所構成的這城,雖然我們的感官藉各樣不同的入口充滿它,然而同一個心智仍判別並分辨每一類進來之物,把一切安置在適合悟性的各處。
9:58
Et sicut civitatis exemplum, videmus unius gen­ tis atque cognationis homines non per easdem portas ingredi, sed alios per alium aditum, ut sors se obtu. lerit, introire; nihilominus tamen intra muros eftee­ tos iterum simul esse, qui familiaritate mutua jan gebantur : ut econtrario fieri posse conecdas, et qui sibi sont extranei vel incogniti, uno sæpias civitatis aditu utantur, sed non copulentur invicem commu- mODis introitu; possunt enim intrinsecus constituti habitaculis dirimi. Tale quid et in mentis nos la­ titudine fieri posse conspicio. Frequenter enim ex diversis sensibus scientia una nobis colligitur, quae eamdem rem multiplici sensuum varietate distribuit.
And as in the example of the city, we see men of one nation and kindred enter not by the same gates, but some by one entrance, others by another, as chance offers, yet nonetheless, once made within the walls, they are again together, who were joined by mutual familiarity: so, on the contrary, you may grant that it is possible that those who are strangers or unknown to one another should often use one entrance of the city, yet not be coupled together by the common entry; for they can, once constituted within, be separated into their dwellings. Something of this kind too I behold able to come about in the breadth of our mind. For frequently from diverse senses one knowledge is gathered for us, which distributes the same thing through the manifold variety of the senses.
正如在城的例子中,我們看見同一民族同一宗親的人並非由相同的城門進入,而是有的由這入口,有的由那入口,隨機緣所予而進;然而他們一旦進入城牆之內,那些藉彼此熟識而相連的人便又聚在一起:照樣,你也可以反過來承認,有可能那些彼此陌生或不相識的人,常由城的同一入口進入,卻不因這共同的進口而相聯合;因為他們一旦進入內裡,便能分散到各自的住所。我看見在我們心智的廣闊中也能發生這樣的事。因為我們常從不同的感官匯集成一個知識,這知識藉感官的多樣變化分配同一件事物。
9:59
Itemque huic contrariam est videre, ex uno aliquo sensu, multa variaque nihil sibi invicem juxta natu­ ram concordantia consonantiaque perdiscere, at pote proponatur (melius est enim exemplis enucleare sen­ tentiam) aliquid de morum proprietate perquiri, quid suave sit sensibus, quidve gustantibus sit ri­ tandum. Experientia quippe ipsa reperit amaritudi- nem fellis, mellisque gratissimam qualitatem. Cum haec ergo certa sint, unam confert scientiam, res ea­ dem intelligentiae nostræ multifarie conquisita, id est, per gustum, visum, auditum, odoratum etiam frequenter et tactum.
And likewise it is to be seen, contrary to this, that from some one sense many and various things, in no way concordant or consonant with one another according to nature, are thoroughly learned. As, for example, let it be proposed (for it is better to elucidate the thought by examples) that something be inquired concerning the property of qualities—what is pleasant to the senses, and what is to be shunned by those that taste. For experience itself discovers the bitterness of gall and the most agreeable quality of honey. Since, therefore, these are certain, the same thing, sought out in manifold ways by our understanding—that is, through taste, sight, hearing, smell, and frequently also touch—confers one knowledge.
同樣,與此相反,也可見到從某一個感官能徹底領會許多、各樣、按本性彼此毫不協調一致之物。例如,假設(因為用例子闡明思想較為有益)有人探問關於性質的屬性——什麼於諸感官是悅人的,什麼於品嚐者是當避的。因為經驗本身就察出膽汁的苦與蜂蜜最為可口的性質。所以,既然這些是確定的,同一件事物,被我們的悟性以多種方式探求——即藉味覺、視覺、聽覺、嗅覺,且常藉觸覺——便匯成一個知識。
9:60
Nam mei quispiam videns, et nomen ejus audiens, et gustum percipiens, et odo­ rem sentiens, et lactu comprobans, unam rem per omnes sensus agnoscit. Item varia quoque et multi­ formia per unum quempiam ex sensibus complecti­ mur et tenemus; nam et auditus multimodas excipi I. voces, et oculorum visos indiscretam atque multipli­ cem habet efficaciam ad contuendum ea quæ genere sunt diversa. Similiter enim album contemplatur et nigrum et omnia quæ sibi sunt colorum contrarietate distantia, sicut odoratus, sicut gustus, et tactus om- nimodarum scientiam rcrum suis capere probatur effectibus. CAPUT XI. De essentia animæ.
For when someone of us sees a thing, and hears its name, and perceives its taste, and senses its smell, and tests it by touch, he recognizes one and the same object through all the senses. Likewise too we embrace and grasp various and manifold things through any single one of the senses; for hearing receives manifold voices, and the sight of the eyes possesses an undivided and manifold power for beholding things that are diverse in kind. For in like manner it contemplates white and black and all the things that are set apart from one another by contrariety of colour; just as smell does, just as taste, and touch is proved by its own operations to take in the knowledge of things of every sort. CHAPTER XI. On the essence of the soul.
因為我們中間若有人看見一物,又聽見它的名稱,又嚐到它的滋味,又聞到它的氣味,又以觸覺加以察驗,他便藉著一切感官認出同一個對象。同樣,我們也藉著感官中任何一個,把繁多而多樣的事物攬入並把握;因為聽覺接收種種不同的聲音,眼睛的視覺也具有一種不可分卻又多重的能力,去觀看那些在種類上互異的事物。它照樣觀看白與黑,以及一切因顏色相反而彼此相隔的事物;嗅覺如此,味覺如此,觸覺也藉著自己的作用,被證明能領受萬般事物的知識。第十一章 論靈魂的本質。
9:61
Quid igitur est mens juxta naturam propriam, quæ senssualibus polenliis sese distribuit, et per sin­ gulas competenter eorum quae sunt scientiam su­ mit ? Quod enim aliud quiddam sit præter seusum, quemlibet prudentium dubitare non arbitror. Nam si idipsum mens quod sensus esset, unius profecto juxta sensus efficaciam proprietatis existeret, propter­ ea quod simplex quidem ipsa sit et nihil in re sim­ plici varium conspici queat :
What then is the mind according to its own proper nature, which distributes itself to the sensory powers and through each of them duly takes up the knowledge of the things that exist? For that it is something other than sense, I do not suppose any prudent person would doubt. For if the mind were the very same thing as sense, it would surely exist as a single property corresponding to the efficacy of sense, for the reason that it is itself simple, and nothing varied can be discerned in a thing that is simple.
那麼,心智按其本性究竟是什麼呢?它把自己分配給各感官的能力,並藉著每一感官恰當地取得萬物的知識。它乃是有別於感官的某種東西,我想凡有見識的人都不會懷疑這一點。因為心智若與感官是同一回事,它必定只會作為一種與感官作用相應的單一屬性而存在,因為它本身是單純的,而在單純之物中是看不出任何多樣性的。
9:62
nunc autem onmibus consentientibus, aliud est tactus, aliud odoratus, ct alios quidem incommutabiles et impermixtos simili­ ter esse sensus ad invicem, et quia mens singulis æqualiter adest, aliud quid oportet eam propter sen­ sualem diffinire substantiam, ne quid rei intelligibili possit varietatis ascribi. Quis cognovit sensum Do­ mini ? Apostolus ait; ego autem dico : Quis propria:n mentem considerare prævaluit? Dicant qui Dei nalu­ ram se putant posse comprehendere, si se considc­ rant, si mentis suæ substantiam norunt;
But now, by the consent of all, touch is one thing, smell another, and the senses are mutually unchangeable and unmixed; and since the mind is present equally to each one of them, it must be defined as something other than the sensory substance, lest any variety be ascribed to the intelligible reality. 'Who has known the mind of the Lord?' says the Apostle; but I say: Who has been able to consider his own mind? Let those speak who think they can comprehend the nature of God, whether they consider themselves, whether they know the substance of their own mind;
但如今,眾人都同意:觸覺是一回事,嗅覺是另一回事,諸感官彼此是不變且不相混的;而既然心智平等地臨在於每一個感官之中,就必須把它界定為有別於感官實體的某物,免得把任何多樣性歸給那可理解的實在。使徒說:「誰知道主的心思呢?」我卻要說:誰能考察自己的心智呢?讓那些自以為能領悟神之本性的人說話罷,看他們是否考察過自己,是否認識自己心智的本質;
9:63
si multi­ moda quædam est, variæque compositionis, quomodo in multiplices sensus inseritur, quomodo in singula­ ritate Quod varium, quomodo in varietate quod sin­ gulare est invenitur? Sed agnovi solutionem difficil­ limæ quæstionis, ad ipsam vocem divinam recur­ rens : Faciamus, inquit, hominem ad imaginem et si­ militudinem nostram. Imago namque quandiu in nullo prolicit ab his quæ in primæva forma substant, pro­ prie imago cognoscitur; si vero a similitudine fornax recesserit, juxta eam partem imago non erit. Quo­ modo igitur et hoc unum ex his est quæ in divina natura considerantur, quod incomprehensibilis habe­ tur essentiæ, necesse est et imaginem primævæ for­ imitari substantiam.
whether it is something manifold and of varied composition, how it is inserted into the manifold senses, how that which is varied exists in singleness, how that which is single is found in variety. But I have come upon the solution of this most difficult question by having recourse to the divine voice itself: 'Let us make,' it says, 'man after our image and likeness.' For so long as the image departs in nothing from the things that subsist in the primal form, it is properly recognized as an image; but if the copy has receded from the likeness, in respect of that part it will not be an image. Since therefore this too is one of the things considered in the divine nature, namely that it is held to be of an incomprehensible essence, it is necessary that the image also should imitate the substance of the primal form.
看它是否是某種繁多而組成多樣之物,它如何被植入繁多的感官中,那多樣之物如何存於單一之中,那單一之物又如何見於多樣之內。但我藉著回到那神聖的話語本身,得到了這極艱難問題的解答:經上說:「我們要照著我們的形像,按著我們的樣式造人。」因為形像只要在任何方面都不偏離那在原初樣式中存留的事物,它就被正當地認作形像;但那摹本若已離開了那樣式,就在那一部分上不再是形像。既然這也是在神聖本性中所思想的事物之一——即祂被認為具有不可理解的本質——那麼形像也就必須效法原初樣式的本質。
9:64
Quod si imagines natura comprehendere potest, cum primæva forma in sua comprehensibilitate permaneat, ex hac ipsa contra­ rietate qua comprehenditur esse dissimilis compro­ batur. Porro cum fugiat humanam scientiam mentis nostrae natnra, quæ est effecta ad imaginem, refert incomprehensibilitate sui omnipotentiam naturæin­ comprehensibilis exprimens. CAPUT XII. Inquisitio ubi principale hominis esse videatur, et de lacrymis et risu. Sileat ergo omnis conjecturalis et vana locutio quæ mille quibusdam rebus corporeis vim intelle­ ctualis operationis includit : ex quibus quidam id quod hominis principale est, in corde constituunt:
But if our nature could comprehend the images, while the primal form remains in its own comprehensibility, then by this very contrariety, by which it is comprehended, it is proved to be unlike. Furthermore, since the nature of our mind, which was made after the image, escapes human knowledge, it reflects, by its own incomprehensibility, the omnipotence of the incomprehensible Nature which it expresses. CHAPTER XII. Inquiry where the ruling part of man may be seen to be, and concerning tears and laughter. Let every conjectural and empty discourse be silent, which encloses the power of intellectual operation within a thousand bodily things: from among which some place that which is the ruling part of man in the heart;
但我們的本性若能領會這些形像,而原初樣式卻仍存於它自己的可被領會之中,那麼正是藉著這一相反——即它之被領會——它就被證明為不相似。再者,既然我們那按形像受造之心智的本性,逃離了人的知識,它就藉著自己的不可理解,反映出那不可理解之本性的全能,並把它表達出來。第十二章 探究人的主宰部分究竟見於何處,並論眼淚與笑。所以,凡把理智運作的能力封閉於千百種有形之物中的一切臆測而空洞的言論,都當緘默;在這些人中,有些把人的主宰部分安置在心臟裡;
9:65
quidam vero in cerebro subsislere suspicantur, qua­ dam superficie persuasionum opinionem hujus robo­ rantes. Is enim qui in corde principale hominis esse deficit, ex loci situ argumenta nititur suae rationis apponere, propterea quod medium locum videtur tor totius corporis continere, quatenus se sponta­ reus motus e medio ad omne corpus facilius cxhi- Lens, in quos voluerit effectus erumpat. Ad hanc autem rationem veluti testes videntur afferre tristifi­ cas atque irascibiles hominis affectiones: quod scilicct hujusmodi passiones hanc partem ad compassionem commovere videantur.
others, however, suspect that it resides in the brain, strengthening the opinion by some surface plausibility of persuasions. For he who places the ruling part of man in the heart strives to set forth the arguments of his reasoning from the situation of the place, because it seems to occupy the middle position of the whole body, inasmuch as a spontaneous motion, displaying itself more easily from the middle to the whole body, may break out into whatever effects it wills. And to this reasoning they seem to bring forward as witnesses the saddening and irascible affections of man: namely that passions of this kind seem to move this part to sympathy.
另有些人卻猜想它居於腦中,並以某種表面的勸說之說來鞏固這意見。因為那把人的主宰部分安置在心臟的人,力圖從這位置的所在引出他推論的論據,因為心臟似乎佔據著全身的中央位置,以致那自發的運動,從中央更容易展現於全身,便可隨意爆發為它所願的種種作用。為了這推論,他們似乎還援引人那悲傷與易怒的情感為證:即這類情緒似乎能觸動這部分產生共感。
9:66
Qui vero cerebrum intelligcn­ tiæ domicilium credunt, quasi quamdam arcem uni­ versi corporis caput asserunt a natura constructum, in quo mentem quasi reginam quamdam inhabitare pronuntiant, quæ veluti quibusdam nuntiis seu pro­ tectoribus ita sensibus circumquaquc valletur. Signa vero et isti hujuscemodi suspicionis insinuant, quod mens tunc a recto consilio et ab eo quod deceat abducatur, quando cerebri membrana vexatur, et quod in ignorantia honestatis degant, quos ebrietas gravat. Ad haec autem et aliquas causas naturales adjiciunt, quibus opiniones suas singulis quas de principali hominis parte deferunt, confirmare videan­ tur.
But those who believe the brain to be the dwelling-place of intelligence assert that the head was constructed by nature as a kind of citadel of the whole body, in which they declare the mind to dwell like a queen, surrounded on every side by the senses as by certain messengers or guards. These men too suggest signs of such a surmise, namely that the mind is then led away from right counsel and from what is fitting, when the membrane of the brain is disturbed, and that those whom drunkenness weighs down pass their lives in ignorance of decency. And to these they add certain natural causes also, by which they seem to confirm their several opinions which they advance concerning the ruling part of man.
但那些相信腦是智能居所的人,則主張頭乃是本性所建造的、有如全身的一座堡壘,他們宣稱心智像一位女王住在其中,四面被感官如同被某些使者或衛兵所環衛。這些人也提出此種推測的徵兆,即:當腦膜受擾時,心智便從正確的勸導與合宜之事上被引開;而那些被醉酒所壓制的人,就在不知廉恥中度日。除此之外,他們還加上某些自然的原因,藉以似乎能證實他們各自對人之主宰部分所提出的意見。
9:67
Et hic quidem ad igneam naturam cordis cogna­ tionem motuum mentis affirmat, propterea quod et mentis et ignis indormilabilis probetur esse substan­ tia, et quia in cordis parte mentem fatetur influere, idcirco mobilitate fervoris motum temperari mentis astruit, receptaculum naturæ intelligibilis -cur esse pronuntians, in quo calor exundat.
And this one indeed affirms a kinship of the motions of the mind with the fiery nature of the heart, because both the mind and fire are proved to be a sleepless substance; and since he confesses that the mind flows into the part of the heart, he therefore maintains that the motion of the mind is tempered by the mobility of heat, declaring the heart to be the receptacle of the intelligible nature, in which heat overflows.
而這一派人確實肯定,心智的種種運動與心臟的火性有親緣關係,因為心智與火都被證明是不眠的實體;又因為他主張心智流注於心臟這一部分,所以他斷言心智的運動是由熱的流動性所調節,並宣稱心臟乃是那可理解之本性的容器,熱在其中洋溢。
9:68
Alter autem cun­ ctorum sensuum veluti principium atque radicem cerebri membranam esse testatur, suamque ratin­ non hac fiJc confirmat, quod non alibi sit effectus intelligentie collocatus, nisi in ca parte ubi et aures aptatæ irruentes voces accipiunt, et intuitus juxta ipsa oculorum profunda concretus occurrentes pu- pillis imaginum formas transmittit interius, et quali- tales odorum variorum discernuntur attractæ. Sensus etiam qui gustu perficitur, indicio membranulæ cere­ bri (sicut supra dictum est) approbatur, quæ de proximo quosdam nervorum ramusculos ex re ipsa sensibiles per nedos colli usque ad ea loca quæ co­ latorii instar existunt, et musculos circumjacentes interserit.
But the other testifies that the membrane of the brain is, as it were, the principle and root of all the senses, and confirms his reasoning by this proof, that the operation of intelligence is set in no other place than in that part where both the ears, fitted to receive, take in the rushing voices, and the gaze, concentrated in the very depths of the eyes, transmits inward the forms of images that meet the pupils, and the qualities of the various smells, drawn in, are distinguished. The sense too which is accomplished by taste is approved by the evidence of the little membrane of the brain (as has been said above), which from nearby interweaves certain little branches of nerves, sensitive by their very nature, through the joints of the neck right up to those places which exist after the manner of a strainer, and the muscles lying round about.
但另一派人則證稱,腦膜彷彿是一切感官的本原與根源,並以這證據鞏固他的推理:即智能的運作不設於別處,唯設於那一部分——耳朵在那裡被裝置好以接收衝來的聲音,視線在眼睛深處被凝聚,把迎向瞳孔的影像之形傳入內裡,而吸入的各種氣味之性質也在那裡被辨別。藉味覺所成的那感官,也(如上所述)由腦的小膜為證得以證實,這小膜從鄰近處,把某些天生敏感的神經小枝,經由頸的關節,一直交織到那些有如濾器的地方,以及周圍的肌肉。
9:69
Ego autem, quia a passionis accessu ani­ intelligentia sæpe turbatur, et quia juxta uatu­ ralem vigorem cogitationis effectus obtunditur, qua­ dam hoc idem corporis ægrotatione contingere, verum esse pronuntio, et fontem quemdam corpora­ lis caloris cor esse non nego, quod ad irascibilcs impelus facile commovetur. Super Inc nihilominus præesse sensibilibus rebus membranulam cerebri , juxta rationem eorum qui hæc naturali disputationc pertractant, complectens sub se cerebrum, cujus etiam foveri vaporatione pinguedinis audiens, ab his qui se anatomicis inspectionibus occuparunt, irritum quod dicitur omnino non facio;
But I, since the intelligence of the soul is often disturbed by the onset of passion, and since the operation of thought is dulled in proportion to its natural vigour, declare it to be true that this same thing comes about through a certain sickness of the body; and I do not deny that the heart is a kind of fountain of bodily heat, which is easily moved to irascible impulses. None the less, that the little membrane of the brain presides over the things of sense, according to the reasoning of those who treat of these matters by natural disputation, embracing the brain beneath it, which (so I hear from those who have occupied themselves with anatomical inspections) is also nourished by the vapour of fatness—this I by no means hold to be, as the saying goes, of no account;
但我呢,既然靈魂的智能常因情緒的侵襲而受擾亂,又既然思想的運作隨其本然的活力而被鈍化,我便宣告這乃是真的:這同一事是藉著身體的某種病弱而發生的;我也不否認心臟是身體熱量的某種泉源,容易被激動為易怒的衝動。儘管如此,按照那些以自然論辯探討這些事的人之推理,腦的小膜統管著感官之事,並在其下包覆著腦——我又從那些專注於解剖檢視的人聽說,這腦也藉脂肪的蒸氣得滋養——對此我絕不像俗話所說的那樣視為無稽;
9:70
sed non ex his probare contendam quod localibus quibusdam circumscriptionibus incorporea substantia concluda­ tur. Nam nos excessus irrationabiles fieri non ex capitis aggravatione didicimus. Medicorum vero pe­ ritissimi, utrisque lateribus, quibus ejusdem cerebri membranulx continentur, aliqua passione turbatis, rationale nostrum aegrotans definiunt, appellantes freneticam passionem, quia iisdem membranulis frenes nomen existit. Similiter etiam tristitia cor affici suspicantes profecto falluntur. Cum enim non cor, sed os ventris mœrore turbetur, ad cor morbi hujus incommodum imperite transmittunt.
but I will not strive to prove from these things that an incorporeal substance is enclosed within certain local boundaries. For we have learned that irrational frenzies arise not from the heaviness of the head. But the most skilled of physicians, when both sides, by which the little membranes of the same brain are held, have been disturbed by some affection, pronounce our rational part to be sick, calling it the frenetic affection, because the name 'frenes' belongs to those same little membranes. Similarly too those who suspect that the heart is affected by sadness are assuredly deceived. For since it is not the heart but the mouth of the stomach that is disturbed by grief, they ignorantly transfer the discomfort of this malady to the heart.
但我並不力圖從這些事證明:一個無形的實體被封閉於某些局部的界限之內。因為我們已經學到,無理性的狂亂並非起於頭部的沉重。而醫師中最精明者,當包含同一腦之小膜的兩側,因某種病患而受擾時,便斷定我們那理性的部分患了病,稱之為「腦膜炎」(frenetica)的病患,因為「frenes」這名稱正屬於那些小膜。同樣,那些猜想心臟因悲傷而受影響的人,也必定受了欺騙。因為既然受憂傷擾亂的並非心臟,而是胃口,他們便無知地把這疾病的不適轉嫁於心臟。
9:71
Hoc au­ tem disserunt, qui passionum causas diligenter in­ vestigare curarunt, quod in mœrore compressis na­ turaliter totius corporis evaporationum tramitibus atque conclusis in profundissimas internorum sedes cogitur, quidquid per hos respirationis aditus exire prohibetur. Unde coangustatis visceribus accenditur tristitia, sæpe violentior spiritus ex imo trahitur, ut dilatetur id quod contractum est. Et hunc halitum quem mœror extrudit, etiam gemitum vocamus, id est nimii doloris indicium.
But those who have taken care diligently to investigate the causes of the passions discourse thus: that in grief, when the channels of evaporation of the whole body are naturally compressed and shut up, whatever is prevented from going out through these passages of respiration is forced into the deepest seats of the inner parts. Whence, when the viscera are straitened, sadness is kindled, and often a more violent breath is drawn from the depths, that what is contracted may be dilated. And this exhalation which grief thrusts out we also call a groan, that is, the sign of excessive pain.
但那些殷勤探究情緒之原因的人這樣論說:在憂傷之時,當全身蒸發的通道被自然地壓縮並封閉,凡被阻止經由這些呼吸孔道外出之物,便被逼入內臟最深的座位中。由此,當臟腑被收窄,悲傷便被點燃,又常從深處抽出更猛烈的一口氣,好使那被收縮的得以舒張。而憂傷所推出的這口氣息,我們也稱之為呻吟,即極度痛苦的表記。
9:72
Sed qui putant hac ea­ dem passione affici particulam cordis (ut dixi) fallun­ tur, cum non cordis, sed oris ventris sit ista molestia, ex ea occasione quam diximus, quod scilicet evapo­ rationum compressis aditibns, fellis coangustata ve- sicula humorem illum asperum atqne mordacem in os ventris effundit. Et hæc est hujus rei probatio, quod depressis ipsa coloris superficies velut origine (aurigine) videtur intecta, dum fellis humor in venis nimia constrictione diffunditur. Sed hæc ratio ex illo quoque morbo qui huic videtur esse contrarius, id est qui ex lætitia risuque contingit, vel maxime commendatur.
But those who think that the little part of the heart is affected by this same passion (as I have said) are deceived, since this distress belongs not to the heart but to the mouth of the stomach, from that occasion which we have mentioned, namely that, when the passages of evaporation are compressed, the straitened little bladder of the gall pours out that bitter and biting humour into the mouth of the stomach. And this is the proof of this matter, that in the dejected the very surface of the colour is seen to be overspread as with a jaundice (aurigine), while the humour of the gall is diffused in the veins by excessive constriction. But this account is most especially commended also by that malady which seems to be contrary to this, that is, the one which comes from joy and laughter.
但那些以為心臟的小部分受這同一情緒影響的人(如我所說)受了欺騙,因為這苦惱不屬於心臟,而屬於胃口,乃出於我們所提到的那緣由,即:當蒸發的通道被壓縮時,那被收窄的膽囊便把那苦澀而咬人的體液傾入胃口。而這事的明證乃是:在沮喪的人身上,那膚色的表面竟似被黃疸(aurigo)所覆蓋,因為膽汁因過度收縮而在血管中瀰散。但這道理尤其也由那似乎與此相反的疾病——即起於歡樂與笑的那一種——而得到佐證。
9:73
Dilatantur enim quodam modo et dis­ solvuntur per aliquam voluptatem totius evaporatio­ nes corporis suavissima cognitione percepta. Sicut enim ibidem per mœrorem tenues et incertæ respira­ tiones iterum comprimuntur et interius viscerum constringentes affectum ad caput et ad membranam cerebri vaporem humidum supprimunt, qui multum in concavis sub relictis per aditus evaporationibus excurrit ad oculos, et compressione ciliorum per guttas egeritur : hæc autem gutta lacryma nomina­ tur, ita intelligendum est ex afflictione contraria :
For in a certain manner the evaporations of the whole body are dilated and loosened through some pleasure, when a most agreeable sensation has been perceived. For just as in the former case, through grief, the thin and uncertain respirations are again compressed, and, constricting the disposition of the inner parts, drive up to the head and to the membrane of the brain a moist vapour, which, much running about in the hollows beneath, through the passages left for evaporation, rushes to the eyes, and by the compression of the eyelids is poured out in drops—and this drop is named a tear—so it is to be understood from the contrary affliction:
因為藉著某種愉悅,當一個極愜意的感受被領受時,全身的蒸發便以某種方式被舒張並鬆開。正如在前一情形中,藉著憂傷,那稀薄而不定的呼吸再度被壓縮,並收緊內臟的氣質,把一股潮濕的蒸氣逼向頭部與腦膜——這蒸氣在下方的空腔中四處奔流,經由為蒸發所留的孔道湧向眼睛,又因眼瞼的壓縮而成滴傾出——這滴便名為眼淚——照樣,也當從那相反的苦惱來理解:「
9:74
cum plus solito distenduntor respirationis itinera, per ea spiritus in altis se recessibus inserit, et per oris aditum protinus a natura propellitur, visceribus cunctis et maxime jecore (quemadmodum aiunt qui circa ista periti sunt) per quamdam agitationem mo­ tumque ferventissimum, hujuscemodi conceptum spiritum in exteriora pellentibus. Unde facilitatem quamdam exituum ejusdem spiritus natura machi­ nata, rictum oris ex transverso patefacit genam utramque distendens, et quod hinc efficitur risus nomen accepit.
when the channels of respiration are distended more than usual, the breath inserts itself into the deep recesses, and is forthwith driven out by nature through the passage of the mouth, while all the viscera, and especially the liver (as those say who are skilled about these matters), by a certain agitation and most fervent motion, drive this conceived breath outward. Whence nature, having contrived a certain ease for the exits of this same breath, opens the gape of the mouth crosswise, distending both cheeks, and what is thereby effected has received the name of laughter.
當呼吸的孔道被舒張到超乎尋常時,那氣息便鑽入深處的隱蔽角落,並立刻被本性經由口的通道驅出,這時一切臟腑、尤其是肝臟(正如那些通曉此事的人所說),藉著某種激盪與極熱烈的運動,把這吸入的氣息驅向外面。由此,本性既為這同一氣息的出口設計了某種便利,便橫向張開口的裂縫,撐開兩頰,而由此所成的便得了「笑」這名稱。
9:75
Nec propter hoc igitur principale hominis esse in jecore putandum est, nec propter fervorem sanguinis, qui copiosus erga cordis loca versatur, nec ob affectus irascibiles æstimandum in corde esse mentis hospitium. Sed haec ad qualitates corporeas referenda sunL. Mentem vero credendum est xqualiter membra singula juxta ineffabile tem­ peramentum rationis attingere. Et si Scripturam no­ bis ad hoc nonnulli proferunt, quatenus principale in corde hominis esse testentur, non id debemus inexplorata ratione percipere. Qui enim cordis me­ minit et renes asseruit dicens : Scrutans corda et renes Deus. Ita aul utroque aut neutro hoc intelle­ ctuale hominis licebit includi.
Not on this account, therefore, is the ruling part of man to be thought to be in the liver, nor on account of the fervour of the blood, which abounds copiously about the regions of the heart, nor on account of the irascible affections is the lodging of the mind to be reckoned to be in the heart. But these things are to be referred to bodily qualities. The mind, however, must be believed to reach the several members equally, according to the ineffable tempering of reason. And if some adduce Scripture to us for this purpose, so as to testify that the ruling part of man is in the heart, we ought not to perceive it by an unexamined reasoning. For he who made mention of the heart also asserted the reins, saying: 'God searches the hearts and reins.' So it will be permissible to enclose this intellectual part of man either in both or in neither.
所以,不可因此就認為人的主宰部分在肝臟,也不可因血的熱烈——血豐沛地圍繞著心臟一帶——也不可因易怒的情感,就估量心智的寄居處在於心臟。這些事乃當歸於身體的性質。而心智,則必須相信它按著理性那不可言喻的調節,平等地觸及各個肢體。倘若有人為此向我們引用聖經,要證明人的主宰部分在於心臟,我們也不該以未經考察的推論去領會。因為那提及心臟的,也同樣肯定了腰子,說:「神是鑒察人肺腑心腸的。」如此,這人之理智的部分,要麼可以被封閉於二者之中,要麼則一處也不被封閉。
9:76
Obtundi vero easdem intellectuales efficentias, vel etiam sine effectu pror­ sus existere, per qualitatem corporeæ affectionis edoctus, non satis idoneum arbitror argumentum, ut locis aliquibus virtutem mentis asseram contineri, tanquam per tumores partibus occupalis a propria latitudine possit expelli. Corporalis enim hæc opinio est, ut vas praeventum immissis rebus aliud quidquam nequeat'omnino recipere. Intellectualis namque sub. stantia neque in vacuis et convexis partibus corporis immoratur, nec magnitudine vel mole carnis extru­ ditur.
But that these same intellectual energies are dulled, or even exist altogether without effect, through the quality of bodily affection—having been taught this, I do not judge it a sufficiently suitable argument that I should assert the power of the mind to be contained in any places, as though it could be expelled from its proper breadth by swellings when the parts are occupied. For this is a corporeal opinion, that a vessel pre-occupied by things put into it can in no way receive anything else. For the intellectual substance neither lingers in the empty and hollow parts of the body, nor is thrust out by the magnitude or mass of the flesh.
但我既被教導:這同一理智的能力,因身體狀況的性質而被鈍化、甚或全然無效地存在,我卻不認為這是足夠合適的論據,使我能斷言心智的能力被局限於某些處所,彷彿當那些部位被佔據時,它就能被腫脹從它本有的廣度中逐出。因為這乃是一種有形的看法,以為一個已被放入之物佔據的容器,就絲毫不能再容納別的東西。其實理智的實體既不滯留於身體那空虛凹陷的部分,也不被肉的龐大或重量所擠出。
9:77
Sed quia constat veluti organum quoddam musicum totum hominis corpus exstructum, et ple­ rumque contingit ut hi qui musicae periti sunt suam nequeant ostendere disciplinam propter instru­ menti mutilitatem artis industriam renuentis, quod aut tempore vitiatum est, aut aliquo casu disru­ ptum, aut rubigine vel hnmore detritum est, et idcirco sine sonorum manet effectibus, licet ab eo qui tibicinæ artis est peritus inspiretur; sic et mens per omne corporis transiens instrumentum intelle­ ctualibus effectualibus partes, sicut natura aptum est, competenter attingit: et in his quidem qui juxta substantiam permanent vim suæoperationis exerit :
But since the whole body of man is established, as it were, like a certain musical instrument, and it generally happens that those who are skilled in music cannot display their discipline because of the maiming of the instrument that refuses the diligence of the art—because it has either been spoiled by time, or broken by some accident, or worn away by rust or moisture, and therefore remains without the effects of sounds, although it be breathed into by one skilled in the art of the flute-player—so too the mind, passing through the whole instrument of the body, duly reaches the parts with intellectual operations, as nature has made it apt: and in those parts indeed which remain according to their substance it puts forth the force of its operation;
但既然人的全身彷彿被建造成某種樂器,又常會發生這樣的事:精於音樂者不能施展其本領,因為樂器的殘損拒絕了技藝的勤勉——這樂器或因時日而損壞,或因某種意外而破裂,或因鏽蝕或潮氣而磨耗,因此就缺乏聲音的效果,縱使有精於吹笛技藝的人向它吹氣;照樣,心智穿越身體這整個器具,按本性所造之所宜,恰當地以理智的運作觸及各部分:在那些按其本質仍存留的部分中,它確實施展其運作之力;
9:78
in his autem quæ per vilium quoddam artificiosum motum ejus admittere nequeunt, praeter effectum operationis existit.. Naluraliter enim quodam modo mens apta est in his membris proprie congruenter­ que versari, quæ sua sospilate vegetantur : ab his autem prorsus alienari, quæ quadam infirmitate vexata sunt. CAPUT XIII Contemplatio quædam naturalis de materia et natura et mentis inspectione. Mihi vero videtur et plus esse quam naturalis in hac parte contemplatio, per quam possumus aliquid de utilioribus informari dogmalibus.
but in those which, through some defect, cannot admit its skilful motion, it exists apart from the effect of operation. For naturally, in a certain manner, the mind is apt to be properly and fittingly engaged in those members which are quickened by their own soundness; but to be wholly alienated from those which are afflicted by some infirmity. CHAPTER XIII. A certain natural contemplation concerning matter and nature and the inspection of the mind. To me, however, there seems to be in this part a contemplation that is more than natural, through which we can be informed of something of the more useful doctrines.
但在那些因某種缺陷而不能接納它巧妙運動的部分中,它便存在於運作的效果之外。因為心智天然地、以某種方式,適於恰當合宜地運作於那些被自身健全所活化的肢體中;卻全然疏離於那些被某種衰弱所折磨的肢體。第十三章 論物質、本性與心智之省察的某種自然默觀。然而,在我看來,在這一部分中有一種超乎自然的默觀,藉著它我們能在那些更有益的教義上受教。
9:79
Quia igitur optimum et summum præ omnibus ac præminens bo­ num est ipsa Divinitas, ad quam universa recurrunt, quæcunque boni desiderio continentur, idcirco et mentem fatemur, ut pote ad imaginem factam pul­ cherrimi Conditoris, quamdam similitudinem pri­ maevae formae custodire, et ipsam in optimis prorsus existere; si vero extra eam fuerit, simul et ea in qua erat pulchritudine denudari. Sicut autem dici­ mus mentem similitudine pulchritudinis forma:
Since therefore the best and highest good, pre-eminent above all, is the Divinity itself, to which all things recur, whatsoever are contained by the desire of the good, we therefore also confess that the mind, inasmuch as it was made after the image of the most beautiful Creator, keeps a certain likeness to the primal form, and that it exists wholly among the best things; but if it be outside of that, it is at the same time stripped of that beauty in which it was. But just as we say that the mind is adorned by the likeness of the beauty of the principal form,
既然那超乎萬有、卓越無比的至善與至高之善,乃是神性本身——萬物,凡為善之渴望所涵攝者,皆歸向於祂——所以我們也承認:心智既照著那至美之創造主的形像受造,便保有對原初樣式的某種相似,且全然居於至善之中;但它若在那之外,便同時被剝去它先前所處的那美。然而,正如我們說心智是因那主宰樣式之美的相似而得裝飾,
9:80
prin­ cipalis ornari, veluti quoddam speculum præminen­ lis impressione refulgens, juxta eamdem rationem ipsam quoque naturam a mente, qua dispensatur et regitur, credimus contineri ejusque specie decorari, factam veluti quoddam speculum speculi. A natura quoque sustineri hoc materiale nostrae substantiæ profitemur, circa quam eadem natura conspicitur. Cum igitur alterum contineatur ex altero, per hos omnis illius summi et veri participatio congruenter excurrit, per superiorem id quod inferius videtur exornatum. Si quando vero hujus bonae communio­ nis fuerit facta divulsio, et e contrario superior infe­ riora sectatur : tunc deformitas materiæ ipsius appa­ reat cum a natura deseritur.
shining like a certain mirror with the impression of the pre-eminent one, by the same reasoning we believe that nature too is contained by the mind, by which it is dispensed and ruled, and is adorned by its appearance, having been made like a certain mirror of a mirror. By nature also we profess that this material part of our substance is sustained, about which that same nature is contemplated. Since therefore the one is contained by the other, through these the participation of all that supreme and true one duly flows, through the higher that which appears lower being adorned. But if at any time there comes about a sundering of this good communion, and on the contrary the higher follows after the lower, then let the deformity of matter itself appear when it is deserted by nature.
如同一面鏡子閃耀著那卓越者的印記,照同樣的道理,我們相信本性也被心智所涵容——本性藉心智被治理並統管——並因心智的形貌而得修飾,彷彿被造成一面鏡子之鏡子。我們也宣認,我們本質中這物質的部分是由本性所維繫,那同一本性正圍繞著它被默觀。既然這一者被另一者所涵容,那至上而真實之善的分享便藉著它們恰當地流注,藉著上者使那顯為下者的得了修飾。但若有時這美好交通發生分裂,反倒是上者去追隨下者,那麼當物質被本性所離棄時,物質本身的醜陋便顯露出來。
9:81
Informis enim quaedam res et incomposita est ipsa materies per se, et hæc informitate ejus simul, et pulchritudo naturæ corri- pitur, quæ mentis vivacitate decoratur : ac sic ad ipsam quoque mentem per naturæ defectum deriva­ tur materiei deformitas, ita ut imago Dei jam non possit inspici in hac impressione figmenti ; veluti quoddam namque speculum, id est, bonitatis forma atque virtutis post dorsum se ponens abjicit quidem splendoris eximii claritatem. Informitatem vero ma­ teriæ in se prorsus assumit : et boc modo fit mali nativitas, boni privatione subserpens. Bonum est autem, quidquid summo bono conjungitur ;
For matter in itself is a certain formless and ill-composed thing, and by this its formlessness the beauty of nature is at the same time seized upon, the beauty which is adorned by the liveliness of the mind: and thus the deformity of matter is derived even to the mind itself through the defect of nature, so that the image of God can no longer be discerned in this impression of the moulded thing; for, like a certain mirror, that is, the form of goodness and virtue, placing itself behind one's back, casts away indeed the brightness of its surpassing splendour, but takes wholly into itself the formlessness of matter: and in this way comes about the birth of evil, creeping in by the privation of good. But good is whatsoever is joined to the supreme Good;
因為物質就其本身乃是某種無形而拙劣組合之物,而藉著它這無形,本性的美——那被心智的生氣所修飾之美——也同時被劫奪:如此,藉著本性的虧缺,物質的醜陋甚至被傳遞到心智本身,以致神的形像在這受造之物的印記中再不能被看見;因為那善與德的樣式,彷彿一面鏡子,把自己置於背後,便拋棄了那卓越光輝的明亮,反把物質的無形全然納入自身:照這樣,惡便產生了,藉著善的缺乏潛入。而善乃是凡與至善相連結之物;
9:82
quod si extra similitudinem bujus effectionis fuerit, sinc bono procul dubio permanebit. Cum igitur secundum inspectam rationem constat esse summum bonum quod vere bonum est, mens autem ad imaginem summi boni facta est, et ipsa accepit ut ei bene sit ; statura vero quam mens continet, quasi quaedam imago esse probatur imaginis : ostenditur per hoc, quod materiale nostrum tunc bene subsistat atquc bene contineatur, quando a natura dispensatur et regitur. Iterum vero solvitur atque dejicitur, quando cjus provisione privatur, simulque a boni copula- tione secluditur ;
but if it be outside the likeness of this disposition, it will without doubt remain without good. Since therefore, according to the reasoning we have inspected, it is established that the supreme good is that which is truly good, and the mind was made after the image of the supreme good, and itself received that it should be well with it; while the figure which the mind contains is proved to be, as it were, a certain image of an image: by this it is shown that our material part then well subsists and is well contained, when it is dispensed and ruled by nature. But again it is dissolved and cast down, when it is deprived of its provision, and at the same time is cut off from the conjunction of the good;
但它若在這氣質的相似之外,便毫無疑問要無善而存。既然按照我們所考察的推理,確立了至善乃是那真正善的,而心智又是照著至善的形像受造、並自身領受了得享福樂;至於心智所涵的那形相,則被證明彷彿是形像之形像:由此便顯明,我們物質的部分唯有當它被本性所治理統管時,才得以美好地存立、美好地被涵容。但它又被消解、被傾覆,乃在它被剝奪了本性的供養、同時與善的聯結被隔絕之時;
9:83
hoc autem non fit aliter nisi cum ad contrariam partem naturae fuerit facta conversio, nec ad bonum summum desiderium cjus promovet, sed inde declinat, quod pulchritudine semper egere videatur. Necesse est enim ad deformitatem mate­ riei despectissimam atque fœdissimam conformetur id quod similitudinem ejus assequitur. Sed hæc a nobis quadam consequentia dicta sunt, per inspectio­ nem propositam subrogata. Hoc aotem quærebatur, utrum in aliqua parte membrorum intellectualis vir - tus locata sit, aut per omnes artus æqua lance dis­ eiwrat.
but this comes about in no other way than when a turning to the contrary part of nature has been made, and its desire does not advance toward the supreme good, but declines from it, in that it seems always to lack beauty. For it is necessary that that which attains its likeness should be conformed to the most despicable and foulest deformity of matter. But these things have been said by us by a certain logical consequence, supplied through the inspection set before us. This, however, was being inquired into, whether the intellectual power is located in some part of the members, or is dispersed through all the limbs with equal balance.
但這事的發生,唯有當朝向本性相反的一方發生了轉向,而它的渴望不再趨向至善,反倒離開它——因為它似乎始終缺乏美——之時才會如此。因為那追求物質之相似的,就必然要被塑造成物質那極可鄙、極污穢的醜陋。但這些話乃是我們藉著所提出之省察所引出的某種邏輯推論而說的。然而,先前所探究的乃是這事:理智的能力究竟是被安置於肢體的某一部分,抑或以均等的權衡分布於全身的關節之中。
9:84
His enim qui mentem (ut superius dictum est) localibus includunt partibus, et ad demonstra­ tionem opinionis suae proferunt, quod non prospere­ tur intellectus eorum quibus contra naturam cere­ bri membrana vexatur, ostendit ratio quod pcr omnes partes humanæ confirmationis, sicut aptum est unumquodque membrum, naturaliter operclur. Similiter autem vis anima præter efficientiam suhsi­ stit, cum aliqua pars corporis in natura non perma­ net. Et propter hæc oblata est sermoni nostro pro­ posita consequenter inspectio, per quam discamus in hominis constructione, a Deo quidem gubernari mentem, a mente vero materialem vitam nostram contineri, cum in natura persistit :
For to those who (as was said above) enclose the mind in local parts, and bring forward for the demonstration of their opinion that the intellect of those whose membrane of the brain is disturbed contrary to nature does not prosper, reason shows that through all the parts of the human frame each member naturally operates as it is fitted. But similarly the power of the soul subsists apart from its efficiency, when some part of the body does not remain in its nature. And for these reasons there has been offered to our discourse, as a consequence, the inspection set forth, through which we may learn that in the construction of man the mind is governed indeed by God, but our material life is contained by the mind, so long as it persists in its nature;
因為對那些(如上所述)把心智封閉於局部部位、並為證明其意見而提出「凡腦膜違反本性受擾者,其理智便不順遂」這一點的人,理性指明:在人這構造的一切部分中,每個肢體都按其被裝配之所宜而自然運作。但同樣,當身體的某一部分不存於其本性之中時,靈魂的能力便存於其運作之外。為了這些緣故,作為一個推論,便向我們的論述呈獻了所提出的省察,藉著它我們可以學到:在人的構造中,心智誠然由神所治理,而我們物質的生命則被心智所涵容,只要它存留於其本性之中;
9:85
si vcro a natura discesserit, etiam cooperatione mentis eam privari necesse est. Sed revertamur rursus unde digressi su­ mus, quod si in ea quæ a naturali constitutionc omnino exorbitant per aliquam passionem, proprium mens servet effectum, et in his quidem quæ vigent incolumis manet, impos vero fit in his quæ non queunt vim ejus operationis excipere. Fas est autem et es aliis rebus hujuscemodi dogmatis firmare sen­ tentiam : et nisi grave ac molestum est, praesentiam sermonis fatigatus etiam de his paucis, ut potero, explicabo. CAPUT XIV. De tomno et oscitatione, et de somniis ratiocinatio.
but if it depart from nature, it is necessary that it also be deprived of the cooperation of the mind. But let us return again to the point from which we digressed: that, if in those things which altogether deviate from their natural constitution through some passion, the mind keeps its proper effect, and in those things indeed which flourish it remains unimpaired, but becomes powerless in those which cannot receive the force of its operation. It is right, however, to confirm the opinion of a doctrine of this kind from other matters also: and unless it be grievous and troublesome, though wearied with the present discourse, I will explain even concerning these few points, as best I can. CHAPTER XIV. Reasoning concerning sleep and yawning, and concerning dreams.
但它若離開本性,也就必然被剝奪心智的協作。但讓我們再回到我們離題之處:即,若在那些因某種情緒而全然偏離其本然構造的事物中,心智仍保有它本有的效用,並且在那些蓬勃的事物中保持無損,卻在那些不能接納它運作之力的事物中變得無能。然而,從其他事情也來證實這類教義的看法,乃是合宜的:除非太過繁難惱人,我雖已因眼下的論述而疲憊,仍要盡我所能就這幾點加以闡明。第十四章 論睡眠與打哈欠,並關於夢的推理。
9:86
Materiali, hæc et fluxa corporis vita semper in motu procedens, in hoc habet existendi vini atque potentiam, ut uunquam prorsus a motu desinat, sed veluti Guvius quidam juxta suum decurrens impe­ tum, plenum quidem demonstret alveum per quem delabitur. Non tamen eadem aqua circa cumdem locum esse videatur, sed aliud quidem ejus trans- currit, aliud vero supervenit : ita et hoc materiale vitæ praesentis, per quemdam motum contrariorum frequeuti sibi successione decurrat, et a commuta­ tione sua stare penitus non potest, sed quietis impa­ tiens jugem conversionem rerum similiter possidet. Quod si aliquando a motu destiterit, pariter et essc cessabit :
This material and flowing life of the body, always proceeding in motion, has its force and power of existing in this, that it never wholly ceases from motion, but, like a certain river running according to its own impetus, it indeed shows a full channel through which it glides down. Yet the same water is not seen to be about the same place, but one part of it runs across, while another comes after: so too this material part of the present life runs down through a certain motion of contraries with a frequent succession to itself, and it cannot stand still at all from its mutation, but, impatient of rest, it likewise possesses a continual turning of things. But if at any time it should cease from motion, it will at the same time also cease to exist;
身體這物質而流動的生命,永遠在運動中前進,它存在的力量與能力就在於:它絕不全然止於運動,而像一條依其自身衝勢奔流的河,它確實顯出一道盈滿的河床,自其中滑落而下。然而那同一河水並不見得停在同一地方,乃是它的一部分流過去,另一部分隨後來到:照樣,眼前生命的這物質部分,也藉著相反者的某種運動、以接連不斷的更替向自身奔流而下,它絕不能因其變遷而停住,反倒不耐於靜止,同樣保有事物持續的轉換。但它若有時止於運動,便也同時止於存在;
9:87
ut puta plenitudinem relaxat inanitas, itemque inanitati plenitudo succedit, somnus conti­ nuum vigiliarum laborem sustentat. Itemque vigiliæ quod resolutum esse videbatur consolidant, et neu­ trum horum in codem statu permanet, sed mutua sihi præsentia utrumque succedit. Itaque se ipsa natura mutationum vicibus innovante, ut partem videlicet utriusque recipieris ab altera migret ad alteram. Nam si semper animal persistat in opere, intentio disruptionem divulsionemque partium quæ tenduntur, efficiet : continua quoque corporum quies ruinam quamdam solutionemque status operabitur.
as, for instance, emptiness relaxes fullness, and again fullness succeeds emptiness, sleep sustains the continual labour of wakefulness. And again wakefulness consolidates what seemed to have been loosened, and neither of these remains in the same state, but by a mutual presence each succeeds the other. And so nature, renewing itself by alternations of changes, passes, as it were, having received the part of either from the one to the other. For if the animal should always persist in activity, the strain would effect a rupture and tearing apart of the parts that are stretched: a continual rest of the bodies too would work a certain ruin and dissolution of the state.
譬如,空虛鬆弛了充盈,充盈又繼空虛而來,睡眠支撐著醒覺的持續勞苦。而醒覺又鞏固那似乎已被鬆弛之物,這二者沒有一個停在同一狀態,乃是藉著彼此的交替臨在,各自繼另一者而來。如此,本性藉著變化的輪替而自我更新,彷彿既領受了二者各自的一份,便從這一者過渡到另一者。因為動物若總是持續活動,這緊張便會造成那些被拉伸之部分的斷裂與撕裂:身體持續的靜止,也會造成這狀態的某種崩壞與消解。
9:88
In tempore vero moderatius utrumque perceptum, fortitudinem ad permansionem substantiæ commo- dabit, quæ per continuum ad contraria transitum utrinque alternante sibi successione reparatur. Sic ergo opportunitatem quietis nacta natura, distenti vigiliis corporis excogitat qnalilcr robori subveniat per soporem, et sensibus ab operatione semotis, otium ad tempus impertit, et veluti equos post cer - tamina sudoresque compescens. Necessaria vero est corpori quies, ut sine impedimento quoque cibus in omnia membra per occulta eidem itinera diffundatur, nulla intentionis obice meabilem præcludente trans gressum.
But each perceived more moderately in due time will furnish strength for the continuance of the substance, which is repaired by a continual passage to contraries, with an alternating succession on either side. So therefore nature, having got an opportunity for rest, contrives how it may succour by sleep the vigour of the body wearied with wakefulness, and, the senses being withdrawn from operation, it imparts leisure for a time, restraining them, as it were, like horses after contests and sweats. Rest, moreover, is necessary for the body, that without impediment the food too may be diffused into all the members by hidden paths of its own, no obstacle of strain shutting off the passable transit.
但二者在適當的時候被較為節制地領受,便會供給實體得以延續的力量,這實體藉著向相反者的持續過渡、以兩邊交替的更迭而得修復。所以本性既得了安息的機會,便設法如何藉睡眠救助那因醒覺而疲憊的身體之活力,而當感官從運作中被撤回時,它就賜予一時的閒息,彷彿勒住競賽與汗流之後的馬匹一般。再者,安息對身體是必需的,好使食物也能毫無阻礙地藉它自身隱密的途徑被輸送到一切肢體中,沒有緊張的障礙阻斷那可通行的通路。
9:89
Nam sicut ex infusa imbribus terra, cum radiis solis fota fuerit, vapores quidam caliginosi de profundis cjus finibus extrahuntur, similiter et in nostra fit terra : cum cibus intrinsecus congenitoque calore decoqnitur, vapor quidam naturaliter, ut poto aereus, ad superna contendit, et veluti fumus pcr rimas parielis penetrans ad capitis loca pervenit, inde per dictos adnexus sensibus exhalatur. Unde necesse est, tunc sensus otium gerere vaporuin trans- gressione detentos. Oculi sopili sunt, et palpebra­ rum obductione veluti quodam mechanicæ artis æquo pondere conteguntur :
For just as from earth soaked with rains, when it has been warmed by the rays of the sun, certain misty vapours are drawn out from its deep boundaries, similarly it comes about in our earth too: when food is cooked within by the innate heat, a certain vapour naturally, being as it were aerial, strives toward the upper parts, and, like smoke penetrating through the chinks of a wall, reaches the regions of the head, thence being exhaled through the aforesaid connections to the senses. Whence it is necessary that the senses then keep leisure, detained by the passage of the vapours. The eyes are lulled to sleep, and are covered by the drawing down of the eyelids as by a certain even weight of mechanical art:
因為正如從被雨水浸透的土地——當它被太陽的光線溫暖時——某些霧氣般的蒸氣便從它深處的境界被抽出,同樣在我們這土地(身體)中也是如此:當食物被內在的天然熱量煮化時,某種蒸氣自然地、彷彿是氣態的,向上方奮力上升,又像煙穿過牆壁的裂縫,抵達頭部一帶,再從那裡經由前述與感官相連之處被呼出。由此,感官就必然要保持閒息,被那蒸氣的通行所滯留。眼睛被催入睡眠,又因眼瞼的垂下而被遮蓋,彷彿被某種機械技藝的均衡之物所覆;
9:90
ipsis quoque vaporibus et auditus obstruitur, et quasi quodam ostio auribus imposito a sua naturali operatione feriatur. Hæc autem talis passio somnus dicitur, vacantibus in corpore sensibus, et juxta naturalcm motum nihil prorsus agentibus, ut digestiones escarum exitu faciliore proveniant, et suos meatus ipsa exhalatione transcurrant. Quapropter si coangustentur his exha­ lationibus ea loca quae circa sensus sunt, et quadam somnus occupatione tardetur, vapore complentur :
by these same vapours hearing too is obstructed, and, as by a certain door set upon the ears, it takes holiday from its natural operation. But such an affection of this kind is called sleep, the senses being idle in the body and, according to natural motion, doing nothing at all, so that the digestions of food may proceed with an easier exit, and run across their channels by exhalation itself. Wherefore, if those places which are about the senses be straitened by these exhalations, and the senses be slowed by a certain occupation of sleep, they are filled with vapour;
被這同樣的蒸氣,聽覺也被堵塞,又彷彿被某扇門安在耳上,便從它本然的運作中休息。但這種狀況便稱為睡眠,這時感官在身體中閒置,按自然的運動全然無所作為,好使食物的消化能以較容易的出路進行,並藉呼出本身奔過它們的通道。因此,若感官周圍的那些地方被這些呼出之氣收窄,而感官又被睡眠的某種佔據所遲緩,它們便充滿蒸氣;
9:91
et quia ex nervis constat esse composita, ut colli ac faucium naturaliter ex sese tenduntur, ita ut per hanc extensionem, illa quæ fucrant compressa vapo- ribus, tenuentur, ut fieri solet ab his qui vestes infusas nimia compressione torquentes humorem omnem nituntur exprimere ;
and since they are constituted as composed of nerves, like those of the neck and throat, they are naturally stretched of themselves, so that through this stretching those things which had been compressed by the vapours may be thinned, as is wont to be done by those who, twisting infused garments by excessive compression, strive to squeeze out all the moisture;
又因為它們生成的構造乃由神經組成,如同頸與咽喉的神經,它們便自然地自行伸張,好藉這伸張使那些被蒸氣所壓縮之物變得稀薄,正如那些把浸濕的衣物用力擰絞、力圖榨出一切水分的人所慣常做的那樣;
9:92
et quia partes qure circa fauces sunt, rotundiores videntur, abundantque nervis, ut dictum est, si quando discludi ab bis va­ porum crassitudinem convenit, quia impossibile sit rotunditatem porrectam ostendi, nisi id suo schemate Peragat, idcirco relictus in oscitationc spiritus men­ tum quidem deorsum ad facies quadam concavatione pertrahit, et cunctis interius in orbe patefactis, un­ dosa illa spissiludo quae in ipsis locis insederat spi­ ritu propellente dirigitur. Frequenter autem et post somnum nobis idipsum solet accidere, cum ex illis vaporibus indigestum quid fuErit subrelictum.
and since the parts which are about the throat seem to be more rounded, and abound in nerves, as has been said, when at any time it is fitting to dispel from these the thickness of the vapours, since it is impossible for the rounded shape to be shown extended unless it accomplish this by its own configuration, therefore the breath, left in the yawn, draws the chin indeed downward toward the face with a certain hollowing, and, all things within being opened in a circle, that billowy thickness which had settled in those places is directed forth by the breath driving it. But frequently even after sleep this same thing is wont to happen to us, when something undigested has been left over from those vapours.
又因為咽喉一帶的部分顯得較圓,並如所說富於神經,故當有時需要從這些部位驅散蒸氣的稠厚時——既然那圓形除非藉自身的構型來完成,否則不可能顯為伸展——所以那留於哈欠中的氣息,便把下巴向下、朝臉部以某種凹陷拉動,而當內部一切都環狀地被打開時,那曾停留於這些地方的、波浪般的稠厚,便被驅它的氣息所導出。而我們甚至在睡後也常會發生這同一事,當那些蒸氣中有未消化之物被殘留下來時。
9:93
Ex his itaque causis una mens evidenter ostenditur, quod naturre congruens atque consentiens esse v- deatur : dum vigilante illa et hæc suos effectus ese­ rat, resoluta vero in somnum etiam mens persistat immobilis : nisi forte imaginationes somniorum men­ lis agitationes esse qnis aestimet, eamque operantem per soporem suis motibus arbitretur. Nos autem con­ stanter asserimus eam solam actionem ad mentem referendam, quæ sapientia consilioque perficitur. Ea vero quæ per somnum phantasmatum deliramenta proveniunt, imaginationes quasdam efficientiæ icen­ tis opinamur, quas irrationabilis pars animæ per accidentia quæque confingit.
From these causes, therefore, the mind is evidently shown to be one, which seems to be congruous and consenting with nature: while it is awake, this too puts forth its effects, but when it is relaxed into sleep, the mind too remains immovable—unless perchance someone should reckon the imaginations of dreams to be the agitations of the mind, and should judge it to be operating through sleep by its own motions. But we constantly affirm that that action alone is to be referred to the mind which is accomplished by wisdom and counsel. But those vain wanderings of phantasms which arise through sleep, we suppose to be certain imaginings of the unseeing efficiency, which the irrational part of the soul fabricates through chance occurrences.
所以,從這些原因,心智顯然被證明是同一的,它似乎與本性相契相合:當它醒著時,本性也施展它的效用,但當它鬆弛入睡時,心智也保持不動——除非有人或許把夢的幻象當作心智的活動,並判斷它在睡中藉自己的運動而運作。但我們堅定地肯定:唯有那藉智慧與謀算而成就的活動,才歸於心智。至於那些藉睡眠而生的幻象之妄走,我們則認為是那無視之能力的某些臆想,是靈魂中無理性的部分藉著種種偶發之事所虛構的。
9:94
Anima quippe a sensi­ bus avocata per somnum, necesse est ut mentis quoque privetur effectu. Per sensus enim ad homi­ nem quodammodo reversio mentis enicitur, quibus vacantibus et inlelligentiam necesse est otiari : cujus rei argumentum est, quod frequenter ineptissimis atque vanissimis formis dormienles illudimur : quod nequaquam fieret, si consilio tunc anima et ratione regeretur. Sed mihi videtur, cum præsentior vis animæ, id est efiicientia mentis et sensuum conquie­ scit, illam tantummodo partem ejus in somniis ope­ rari, quæ nutrimenta incrementaque dispensat.
For the soul, being called away from the senses through sleep, must necessarily also be deprived of the effect of the mind. For through the senses a return of the mind to man is in some way effected, and, these being idle, the intelligence too must necessarily be at leisure: of which thing the proof is, that frequently in sleep we are mocked by the most absurd and most empty forms; which would by no means happen if the soul were then ruled by counsel and reason. But to me it seems that, when the more present power of the soul, that is, the efficiency of mind and of the senses, takes rest, that part of it alone operates in dreams which dispenses the nourishments and increases.
因為靈魂藉睡眠從感官中被召離,便必然也被剝奪心智的效用。因為心智藉感官在某種意義上歸返於人,而當這些感官閒置時,智能也必然要閒息:這事的明證乃是,我們在睡中常被那極荒謬、極空虛的形象所戲弄;倘若靈魂那時受謀算與理性所治理,這就絕不會發生。但在我看來,當靈魂那較為臨在的能力,即心智與感官的運作,安歇之時,唯有那分配養分與生長的部分在夢中運作。
9:95
Si autem hoc ita est, somnia quae fiunt et imaginatio­ nes sensibus et intelligentiæ congruentes hac nimi­ rum causa contingunt. Quæcunque nobis per animæ partem, in qua memoria viget, impressa sunt, hæc eadem, ut sors attulerit, veluti pietas oris opere formantur, figuratione quadam jugiter adhærente in hac specie animæ qua memoria continetur. His ita- que phantasiis homo deludilur, non alicujus ordinis tramite ad eorum quæ apparent visionem collocu­ tionemque productus, sed mixtis quibusdam et in­ consequentibus seductus erroribus.
But if this is so, the dreams that occur and the imaginations agreeable to the senses and to the intelligence come about no doubt for this cause. Whatsoever has been impressed upon us through that part of the soul in which memory flourishes, these same things, as chance has brought them, are formed as it were by the work of the mouth's modelling, with a certain figuration continually adhering in this species of the soul by which memory is contained. By these phantasies, therefore, man is deluded, led not by the track of any order to the vision and conversation of the things that appear, but seduced by certain mixed and inconsequent errors.
但若是如此,那發生的夢以及那些與感官和智能相合的臆想,無疑是為了這緣故而生。凡藉著靈魂中那記憶旺盛的部分被印在我們身上的事物,這些同樣的事物,便照機運所帶來的,彷彿被口的塑造之工所造形,有某種形相持續地附著於靈魂這保有記憶的種類之中。所以,人便被這些幻象所迷惑,他不是被某種次序的軌道引向那些顯現之物的看見與交談,而是被某些混雜而前後不貫的謬誤所誘惑。
9:96
Sicut enim in opere corporali unicuique membro proprie quid juxta vim sibi naturaliter insitam peragenti, etiam quiescentis membri quidam consensus cooperationis accedit, eadem rationis consequentia de anima quo­ que sentiendum est. Nam cum quiddam ejus quiescit, quiddam vero movetur, totum parti necessario con­ sentit, quia nec possibile est unitatem naturalem tunc posse dividi, etsi pars quædam potentiarum ejus in opcrationc persistat. Sed quemadmodum vigilantibus et satagentibus obtinet quidem mens, cique sensus obsequitur, nec ei:
For just as in the bodily work, while each member properly performs something according to the power naturally implanted in it, there comes also a certain consent of cooperation even of the member that is at rest, by the same logical consequence it is to be thought concerning the soul also. For when one part of it rests, while another is moved, the whole necessarily consents with the part, since it is not possible that the natural unity can then be divided, even though some part of its powers persists in operation. But just as, in those who are awake and busy, the mind indeed prevails, and the sense obeys it, and yet:
因為正如在身體的工作中,當每個肢體按其天然賦予的能力恰當地完成某事時,連那安歇的肢體也有某種協作的同意加入,照同樣的邏輯推論,對於靈魂也當如此思想。因為當它的一部分安歇、另一部分運動時,全體就必然與那部分同意,因為那本然的合一那時不可能被分割,縱使它能力的某部分仍持守於運作中。但正如在醒著而忙碌的人身上,心智確實主導,感官順從它,然而:「
9:97
tamen adesse dispen- satrix illa potentia corporis approbatur, siquidem mens usibus cibum providet, sensus autem sumit quod provisum est, ea vero corporis virtus quæ nutrimentis invigilat, proprie sibi quod datur acqui- rit; ita per somnum ablato harum potentiarum usu quodammodo commutantur in nobis, et obtinet id quod irrationabilius esse probatur. Aliorum quidem efficientia conquiescit, non tamen omnino restringi­ tur. Tunc enim vis animi qui nutrimentis insistit, quamvis per soporem ad digestionis contendat offi­ cium omnemque naturam sibi vacare permittat.
nevertheless that power which dispenses for the body is approved to be present, since the mind provides food for use, but the sense takes what has been provided, while that bodily power which watches over the nourishments properly acquires for itself what is given; so through sleep, the use of these powers being taken away, they are in a manner interchanged in us, and that which is proved to be more irrational prevails. The efficiency of the others indeed takes rest, yet is not altogether restrained. For then the power of the soul which attends upon the nourishments, although through sleep it strives toward the office of digestion and permits all nature to be at leisure for itself.
那為身體分配的能力,仍被證實是臨在的,因為心智供給可用的食物,而感官則取那已被供給之物,至於那看顧養分的身體能力,則本就為自己取得所被給予的;所以藉著睡眠,這些能力的運用被取去,它們便在我們裡面以某種方式互換,而那被證明為較無理性的便佔了上風。其餘各能力的運作確實安歇,卻並非全然被約束。因為那時那專注於養分的靈魂之能力,雖藉睡眠趨向消化的職事,並容許全本性為它自身得閒。
9:98
Non enim ab hac ejus operatione potentia illa sensualis abstrahitur, nec enim fas est quod semel naturaliter unitum esr, possit divelli, sed elucescere non potest ejus effectus, somni otio impeditus. Hac itaque ra- tione cum se mens ad sensibilis animi speciem ver­ tit, consequens est cum hic movetur, uti et illam dicamus moveri pariter, et cum quiescit, simili modo quiescere. Quemadmodum vero circa ignem hæc fieri naturale est, ut cum paleis undique tegitur, nulloque spiraculo suscitatur, nec circum tecta de­ pascat, nec penitus exstinguatur, sed pro flamma quidem fumus exsurgat, quod si paululum commotus fuerit, illico fumus excitatur in flammam :
For that sensory power is not withdrawn from this its operation—for it is not lawful that what has once been naturally united can be torn apart—but its effect cannot shine forth, being hindered by the leisure of sleep. By this reasoning, therefore, when the mind turns itself to the form of the sensitive soul, it follows that, when this is moved, we should say that that too is moved likewise, and when it rests, that it rests in like manner. But just as it is natural for these things to come about concerning fire, that, when it is covered on every side with chaff and is roused by no vent-hole, it neither feeds upon what is covered around nor is utterly extinguished, but instead of flame smoke arises, while if it be a little stirred, straightway the smoke is roused into flame:
因為那感官的能力並未從它這運作中被撤離——因為凡曾天然合一之物,被撕裂乃是不合法的——只是它的效用不能顯現出來,因被睡眠的閒息所阻。所以照這推理,當心智轉向那感性靈魂的形態時,便隨之而來:當這感性靈魂被推動時,我們也當說那心智照樣被推動,而當它安歇時,心智也照樣安歇。但正如對火而言,這些事的發生乃是自然的:當火被穀殼四面覆蓋、又無任何氣孔將它煽起時,它既不焚燒周圍所覆之物,也不全然熄滅,乃是不見火焰而冒出煙來,但若稍被攪動,煙便立刻被激成火焰;
9:99
similiter et mens otio sensuum tempore soporis obtecta, nec elucere per eos potest, uec prorsus intercipi, sed instar summi videtur operari, in aliquo quidem egens, in aliquo vero prævalens : et sicut quispiam musi­ cus, resolutis lyræ nexibus, si plectrum chordis inji­ ciat, non ei modulatio competenter occurrit (nec enim extentum quod non est apte resonabit), sed plerumque manus artificiose movetur, ducens ple­ ctrum ad locales positiones accentuum, sonus autem non efficitur nisi inordinatus ex motu chordarum quæ vocant Graeci βόμον ;
similarly the mind too, covered by the leisure of the senses in the time of sleep, can neither shine through them nor be wholly intercepted, but seems to operate after a manner of the highest sort, in one respect indeed lacking, in another prevailing: and just as some musician, when the bindings of the lyre are loosened, if he throw the plectrum upon the strings, the melody does not duly meet him (for what is not stretched will not aptly resound), but for the most part the hand is moved with art, leading the plectrum to the local positions of the accents, yet no sound is produced except a disordered one from the motion of the strings which the Greeks call βόμβον (a buzzing).
照樣,心智也是如此,在睡眠之時被感官的閒息所覆蓋,既不能藉著它們發光,也不能被完全攔阻,反倒似乎以某種至高的方式運作,在某方面確有不足,在另一方面卻佔優勢:又正如某個樂師,當琴弦的繫結鬆開時,他若把撥子拋在弦上,旋律便不能恰當地應和他(因為未被繃緊之物不會合宜地發聲),然而那手大多仍以技藝運動,把撥子引向各音調的位置,卻沒有發出聲音,唯有從那些希臘人稱為 βόμβον(嗡嗡聲)的弦之運動而來的雜亂之響。
9:100
ita per somnum naturali­ bus sensuum membris resolutis, aut omnino quiescit artifex animus, si corpus nimia plenitudine prægra­ vetur, aut certe languidius et obscurius operabitur, cum hoc organum sensuale diligentius artem nequit excipere. Quapropter in somnis memoria quidem confusa, præscientia vero quibusdam velaminibus obruta, praeter votum ac studium quasdam specula­ tur imagines, et aliquid eorum nonnunquam quæ sunt ventura prænuntiat. Nam per subtilitatem na­ turæ plus aliquid habet quam corporis crassitudo ad contemplanda ea quae videntur accedere, sed non potest recto ordine futura reserare, quia occ per­ spicua et manifesta doctrina proponitur eorum quæ in somnis digesta cernuntur.
So, during sleep, when the bodily organs of the senses are relaxed in their nature, the craftsman-mind either rests altogether—if the body is weighed down by excessive fullness—or else works more sluggishly and obscurely, since it cannot employ this organ of sense more carefully for its art. For this reason, in dreams the memory is indeed confused, while foreknowledge, buried as it were beneath certain veils, contemplates certain images apart from any wish or effort, and now and then foretells something of the things that are to come. For by the subtlety of its nature it has somewhat more power than the grossness of the body to draw near to the contemplation of the things that appear; yet it cannot in right order unlock the future, because no clear and manifest teaching is set forth of those things which are perceived as arranged in dreams.
因此,當人在睡眠中、感官的肢體依其本性鬆弛時,那作為工匠的心智,或是完全靜息——倘若身體被過度的飽足所壓垮——或至少運作得更為遲鈍而晦暗,因為它無法更精細地藉這感官的器官來施展其技藝。為此,在夢中記憶固然混亂,而預知之能卻彷彿蒙著某些帷幕,超乎人的願望與努力之外,窺見某些影像,並有時預先宣告某些將要來臨之事。因為憑其本性的精微,它比身體的粗鈍更能趨近於默觀那些顯現之物;然而它無法依正確的次序揭開未來,因為對於夢中所見、編排而成之事,並無清晰明確的教導被陳明出來。
9:101
Sed quidquid illud est. ambigua futuri fit denuntiatio, quod ænigma vocant qui videntur ista discernere, quod, si aliud ostentet in verbis, aliud in intellectibus afferat. Sic pincerna Pharaonis botrum premit in patera, sic panes in canistro ferre pistor imaginatur, uterque enim juxta studium quod exercuit se in somnis esse pervidel. Solitarum namque artium simulacrorum in præ­ scientia mentis impressa per omne vaticinium præ­ dici quæ ventura fuerant præstiterunt.
But whatever it is, the announcement of the future is made ambiguous—what those who seem to discern such things call an 'enigma'—because it shows one thing in words and brings another in meaning. Thus Pharaoh's cupbearer presses the grape-cluster into the cup, and thus the baker imagines that he carries loaves in a basket; for each in his sleep clearly sees himself engaged according to the occupation he had practiced. For the likenesses of their accustomed crafts, impressed upon the mind in its foreknowledge, granted, through every prophecy, the foretelling of what was to come.
但無論那是什麼,對未來的宣告總是含糊不清——那些自以為能辨析此類事物的人稱之為「謎」——因為它在言語中顯出一事,在含義中卻帶來另一事。於是法老的酒政在杯中榨葡萄,麵包師則想像自己用籃子端著餅;因為各人在睡夢中都清楚見到自己依其所操練的行業而忙碌。因為他們慣常技藝的影像,銘印在心智的預知之中,藉著種種預言,使將要來臨之事得以被預先宣告。
9:102
Quod autem Daniel et Joseph eorumque consimiles divina virtute nullis turbati sensibus ad futurorum informantur scientiam, nihil boc ad præsentem pertinet quæstio­ nem, quia non hæc quisque sapiens somniorum generibus imputare debet, alioquin et illas visiones quae divinitus vigilantibus accidunt, non superna visitatione, sed naturae consequentia sponte sua id operante putabit posse contingere.
But as for the fact that Daniel and Joseph and those like them, undisturbed in any of their senses, are informed by divine power for the knowledge of things to come—this has nothing to do with the present question; for no wise man ought to impute these to the various kinds of dreams. Otherwise he will also suppose that those visions which befall the waking by divine agency can come to pass, not by a heavenly visitation, but by the sequence of nature acting of its own accord.
至於但以理、約瑟以及與他們相似的人,毫不受任何感官擾亂,卻藉神聖的大能而被指引去認識將來之事——這與目前的問題毫不相干;因為沒有一個智者應當把這類事歸入夢的種類。否則他也會以為,那些臨到醒著之人、出於神聖的異象,並非藉天上的眷顧,而是憑自然的進程自發運作而得以發生。
9:103
Sicut ergo cunctis bominibus juxta suum sese moderantibus animum, quidam sunt qui divina illustrari confabulatione me­ reantur, ita communiter secundum naturam nobis ac similiter somniorum phanlasiisaccidentibus, non­ nulli per soporem divinæ cujusdam participes revela­ tionis existunt, cæterisque omnibus et si aliqua re per somnium præscientia gignitur, juxta praedictum gignitur modum. Si vero Ægyptius ille vel Assyrius tyrannus ad scienliam futurorum per sommia divini- ius instruuntur, aliud quiddam est quod per eos mirauda dispensalione peragitur. Oportebat enim sanctorum sapientiam declarari quæ videbatur occul­ ta, ne communem vitam sine utilitate vel commodo præteriret.
Therefore, just as among all men who govern their own minds there are some who deserve to be enlightened by divine converse, so likewise, when the fantasies of dreams befall us commonly and similarly according to nature, some in their sleep come to share in a certain divine revelation; while for all the rest, even if some foreknowledge is begotten through a dream, it is begotten in the manner aforesaid. But if that Egyptian or that Assyrian tyrant is more divinely instructed through dreams unto the knowledge of the future, it is something else that is wrought through them by a wondrous dispensation. For it was fitting that the wisdom of the saints, which seemed hidden, should be made manifest, lest it pass through common life without profit or benefit.
因此,正如在一切治理自己心靈的人中,有些人配得被神聖的交談所光照,照樣,當夢的幻象依本性普遍而相似地臨到我們時,有些人在睡眠中得以分享某種神聖的啟示;而對其餘所有人,即或藉夢生出某種預知,也是以上述方式生出的。但若那位埃及人或那位亞述暴君,藉夢更神聖地被指教而認識未來,那便是另有他事,乃藉他們以奇妙的安排而成就的。因為理當使聖徒那看似隱藏的智慧得以顯明,免得它毫無益處或裨益地度過尋常的生活。
9:104
Quomodo namque Daniel talis esse noscere­ tur, nisi incantatorum atque magorum acquisitionem somnii defecisset intentio ? Quomodo etiam salvaretur Ægyptus Joseph in custodia constituto, nisi eum discretio somniorum pertraxisset in medium ? Et ideo quid aliud ista prætendunt, nec secundum phantasias communes omnino pensanda sunt, consueta quippe somniorum facies eadem universorum est quæ modis plurimis specie quadam imaginationis occurrit. Aut enim permanent, ut dictum est, in ea parte animæ qua memoria continetur, studiorum simililudines diurnorum, aut sæpenumero qualitatibus corpora­ lium affectionum somniorum præfiguratur expressio.
For how could Daniel be recognized to be such, unless the effort of the enchanters and magicians had failed in attaining the dream? And how too would Egypt be saved, with Joseph set in prison, unless the interpretation of dreams had brought him forth into the midst? And therefore these things portend something other, nor are they to be weighed at all according to common fantasies; for the customary appearance of dreams is the same for all, which presents itself in very many ways by a certain semblance of imagination. For either, as has been said, there remain in that part of the soul wherein memory is contained the likenesses of the day's pursuits, or oftentimes the expression of dreams is prefigured by the qualities of bodily affections.
因為但以理若非那些術士與行法術之人解夢的努力歸於失敗,他怎能被認出是這樣的人呢?又若非解夢之能把約瑟從囚禁中帶到眾人面前,埃及怎能得救呢?因此,這些事預示著別的事物,也決不可全按尋常的幻象來衡量;因為夢慣常的樣貌對眾人都是一樣的,它藉某種想像的擬態以極多方式呈現出來。因為,如前所說,或是在靈魂中藏有記憶的那部分裡,留存著白日種種活動的影像;或是夢的表現往往被身體諸種情狀的性質所預先勾勒。
9:105
Sic etenim qui sitit esse se miratur in fontibus, et deliciis gaudet qui cibis indiget, et juvenis ætate vigens imaginum ludificatur illecebris pro similitu­ dine passionis. Novi vero ego per somnium et aliam aenigmatum medentium causam. Nam quidam de necessariis meis captus frenesi, cum nimium grava­ retur, quod iUi cibus plus quam virtus ejus exegerat esset oblatus, arbitratus est plura intestina stercore plena sibi superponi. Cumque jam prope esset ut fatigatum corpus ejus sudoribus laxaretur, aquam sibi deferre qua perfunderetur jacens eos qui aderant precabatur obnixe, nec destitit, hoc cum clamore deposcens, donec exitus rerum querelarum talium causam absolveret.
For thus he who thirsts marvels to find himself at fountains, and he who lacks food rejoices in delicacies, and the youth flourishing in his prime is mocked by the allurements of images, after the likeness of his passion. But I myself have learned through a dream yet another cause of healing enigmas. For a certain one of my kinsmen, seized by frenzy, when he was excessively oppressed because food had been offered him beyond what his strength required, supposed that many intestines full of dung were being heaped upon him. And when it was already nearly the moment when his wearied body should be relaxed by sweats, he earnestly besought those present to bring him water with which, as he lay, he might be drenched; nor did he cease demanding this with a cry, until the outcome of events resolved the cause of such complaints.
因為這樣,口渴的人驚奇地發覺自己置身泉水之間,缺食的人在佳餚中歡欣,正當盛年的少年則照其情慾的擬態被影像的誘惑所戲弄。但我自己曾藉一夢得知治癒之謎尚有另一緣由。因我一位至親被狂熱所攫,當他因所進之食超過其體力所需而過度受苦時,竟以為許多盛滿糞穢的腸子被堆疊在他身上。當他疲憊的身體幾乎將要藉汗水鬆解之際,他懇切地求在旁的人給他端水來,好讓他躺著被澆灌;他不住地呼喊著索求此事,直到事情的結局解明了這類抱怨的緣由。
9:106
Nam simul et sudor plurimus ex ejus erupit corpore, et solutus venter intestinorum pondus interpretatus est. Quod igitur obtusa valetu­ dine natura tunc pertulit, corporis inaequalitati com­ passa est, ut molestiam quidem sentiret, et dicere quidem propter ægritudinem manifeste non posset, idque, sicut datur intelligi, nisi ex incommoditate contingeret, sed naturali sopore mens sospitate gerc­ retur, somnium profecto ei qui sic erat affectus, existeret, aquam quidem sudorem, fluxum vero in­ testinorum gravedinem, esca enim gravitatem et pressuram moventis insinuat.
For at the same time both abundant sweat burst forth from his body, and the loosened belly interpreted the burden of the intestines. Therefore what nature then endured under its dulled health, it suffered in sympathy with the body's disorder, so that it indeed felt the distress, and yet because of the sickness could not clearly speak of it—and this, as is given to understand, would not have happened except from the discomfort; but since the mind was kept in safety by natural slumber, there assuredly came to be, for him who was thus afflicted, a dream: the water signifying the sweat, and the flux signifying the heaviness of the intestines; for the food intimates the heaviness and the pressure of what was moving him.
因為與此同時,既有大量的汗從他身上湧出,鬆弛的腹部也把腸內的重負作了詮釋。因此,本性當時在其遲鈍的健康狀態下所承受的,乃是與身體的失調一同感受,以致它確實感到不適,卻因病而無法清楚地說出來——而這,正如可以理解的,若非出於那不適便不會發生;但因心智藉自然的睡眠得以保全,於是對於這樣受苦的人,便確實生出一個夢:水表徵汗,腹瀉則表徵腸內的沉重,因為食物暗示著那攪動他之物的沉重與壓迫。
9:107
Hoc idem vero videtur et pluriwis peritis medicinæ, quod scilicet, juxta passionum differentias, somniorum quoque variæ facies ægrotantibus accidanf, aliae quidem defectis stomacho, et aliæ cerebri passione vaxatis, his etiam qui febre laborant alia;, et aliB qui ex cholera peri­ clitantur et flegmate. itemque dissimiles his qui plenitudine et inanitate decumbunt. Ex quibus possi­ bile est animadvertere quod illa vis animæ per quam nutrimenta nobis incrementaque contingunt, habeat aliquam intellectualis rei particulam, qua sibi socie­ tate consertam, dum qualitas affectionis corporeæ similitudinem quodammodo præferat, juxta passio­ nem quæ obtinet imaginationem congruentem.
This same thing is also observed by very many skilled in medicine—namely, that according to the differences of afflictions, various appearances of dreams likewise befall the sick: some indeed to those failing in the stomach, others to those troubled by an affliction of the brain; others again to those who suffer from fever, and others to those endangered by bile and phlegm; and likewise unlike to these are the dreams of those who lie sick from repletion and from emptiness. From which it is possible to observe that that power of the soul by which nourishment and growth come to us has some particle of an intellectual thing joined to it in fellowship, so that, while the quality of the bodily affection in some way presents its likeness, it produces, according to the affliction that prevails, a corresponding imagination.
這同一件事也為許多精通醫術的人所留意——就是說,按照病症的差異,種種不同的夢境也照樣臨到病人:有些臨到胃衰弱的人,有些臨到腦部患病而受困擾的人;又有些臨到發燒受苦的人,有些臨到因膽汁與痰液而陷於危險的人;同樣,與這些不同的,是那些因飽脹與虛空而臥病之人的夢。由此可以察知,那使我們得著養分與生長的靈魂之能,含有某種理智之物的微分,藉著彼此的相連結合於它,以致當身體情狀的性質以某種方式呈現其擬態時,它便照那當令的病症生出相應的想像。
9:108
Item­ que multis etiam secundum morum diversitatecm somniorum quoque visa formantur. Alia namque sunt viri fortis, alia meticulosi, alia luxuriosi, et alia continentis; aliis largus et aliis avarus imaginibus illuditur : nusquam vero in his intelligentia mentis operatur, sed animae pars irrationabilior, ut sæpe diximus, has phantasias facit, et quibuscunque vi­ gilans studiis assuescit, horum sibi similitudinem præformat in somnis. CAPUT XV. Quod unica duntaxat anima sit in corpore humano, triplici potentia constans. Sed multum a proposito sumus abducti.
Likewise, for many also, according to the diversity of character, the visions of dreams are shaped. For some things belong to the brave man, others to the timid, others to the dissolute, and others to the self-controlled; one is mocked by liberal images, another by avaricious ones; but nowhere in these does the intelligence of the mind operate, but rather the more irrational part of the soul, as we have often said, produces these fantasies, and whatever pursuits one accustoms oneself to while waking, of these it preforms a likeness for itself in dreams. CHAPTER XV. That there is but one soul in the human body, consisting of a threefold power. But we have been led far from our purpose.
同樣,對許多人而言,夢的景象也按性情的差異而成形。因為有些屬於勇敢的人,有些屬於膽怯的人,有些屬於放縱的人,有些屬於自制的人;一人被慷慨的影像所戲弄,另一人被貪婪的影像所戲弄;但在這些之中,心智的理智絕不運作,倒是靈魂中較無理性的那部分,正如我們屢次所說,造出這些幻象,並且人醒時慣於從事的種種活動,它便在夢中為自己預先塑造其擬態。第十五章。論人體之內只有一個靈魂,由三重能力構成。但我們已遠離了我們的本題。
9:109
Demon­ strate namque sermo promiserat quod mens non iu aliqua parte corporis esset inclusa, sed xqualiter per totum sparsa discurrat, juxta naturæ similitudinem motum subjectæ partis efficiens. Est autem ubi et ipsa mens naturæ subsequens impetus ministerium quodammodo servitutis impendit. Frequenter enim natura præcedit corporis, et aut occasiones lætitiæ aut causas moeroris insinuat, ita ut ipsa quidem præstet, initium vel cibos appetere, vel quamlibet aliam rem voluptatis implere. Mens autem tales mo­ tus carnis excipiens, consilii sui nisibus considerata­ rum rerum parat effectus.
For our discourse had promised to demonstrate that the mind is not enclosed in any one part of the body, but ranges, equally diffused, through the whole, effecting its motion according to the nature of the subordinate part. But there is also a case where the mind itself, following the impulse of nature, expends in a manner the service of a kind of servitude. For frequently the nature of the body goes before, and brings on either occasions of gladness or causes of grief, so that it indeed furnishes the impulse—whether to crave food or to fulfill any other matter of pleasure. But the mind, receiving such motions of the flesh, prepares by the efforts of its own deliberation the accomplishment of the things considered.
因為我們的論述曾應許要證明:心智並不被封閉在身體的某一部分,乃是均勻地遍佈於全身而周流,按照所屬部分的本性發動其運作。但也有這樣的情形:心智本身順從本性的衝動,彷彿付出某種服役的職分。因為身體的本性常常居先,引發歡樂的機緣或愁苦的緣由,以致它確實提供那衝動——無論是渴求食物,或滿足任何別樣的快樂之事。但心智領受了肉體這樣的衝動,便藉自己思慮的努力,預備所斟酌之事的成就。
9:110
Hæc vero non Ut in om­ nibus, sed in his tantum qui turpiter affecti, domina­ tum rationis naturæ nutibus subjugant, quique suffragiis ejusdem mentis voluptatibus sensuum ser­ vi! ter obsequuntur. A perfectioribus autem non ita fieri certum est, apud quos mens præcedit in omni­ bus, et ratione potius quam passione id quod oportet exsequuntur, naturaque vestigia pereuntis directa sectatur.
But this happens not in all, but only in those who, being basely affected, subject the dominion of reason to the nods of nature, and who, by the votes of that same mind, slavishly comply with the pleasures of the senses. But in the more perfect it is certain that it does not so happen; with them the mind goes before in all things, and they carry out what is fitting by reason rather than by passion, and nature follows the straight footsteps of the mind that goes before.
但這並非發生在所有人身上,乃只發生在那些受卑劣情慾左右的人身上——他們把理性的統治屈服於本性的點頭示意,並藉同一心智的贊同,奴性地順從感官的快樂。但在更為完全的人身上,確知並非如此;在他們那裡,心智在凡事上居先,他們憑理性而非情慾去履行所當為的,本性也循著那居先引導之心智的正直腳蹤而行。
9:111
Quia vero tres differentias vitalis potentiæ ratio deprehendit, id est nutrimentalem, quæ propter sensus aliquos augmenta recipit, et sensualem, quæ sic nutritur ut sentiatur, ct rationalem, quae perfecta est et per bas omnes extenditur, idcirco notandum est quod una vis tantummodo vitalis, altera vero sensualis, tertia vero prae cæteris etiam rationalis existat. Sed nemo per hæc æstimet tres animas in hominis conformatione propriis circumscriptas esso limitihus, et velut ex pluribus eam credat esse cuti­ flatam, cum vera et perfecta una sit anima naturali­ ter spiritualis atque intelligibilis, quæ per sensus miscetur materiali substantiæ.
But since reason apprehends three distinctions of the vital power—that is, the nutritive, which receives growth on account of certain senses; the sensitive, which is so nourished that it may perceive; and the rational, which is perfect and is extended through all these—therefore it must be noted that one power is merely vital, another sensitive, and the third, beyond the rest, also rational. But let no one on this account suppose that there are three souls in the constitution of man, circumscribed by their own limits, and believe it to be welded together as it were out of many; whereas the true and perfect soul is one, by nature spiritual and intelligible, which through the senses is mingled with the material substance.
但既然理性辨識出生命之能的三種分別——即營養之能,它為著某些感官而得著生長;感覺之能,它如此受養以致能有所感覺;以及理性之能,它是完全的,並貫通這一切而伸展——因此須注意:一種能力僅是生命的,另一種是感覺的,第三種則超乎其餘,並且也是理性的。但不要有人因此以為人的構造中有三個靈魂,各被自己的界限所限定,並以為它彷彿是由多者熔鑄而成;其實真正而完全的,只有一個靈魂,依本性是屬靈的、可理解的,藉感官與物質的本質相摻和。
9:112
Omne vero materiale atque corporeum quod in conversione atque muta­ tione est, siquidem participium capit animatæ poten­ ti:r, motum per incrementa sortitur. Si vero ab ef­ fectu vitati recesserit, motum suum corruptione testabitur. Igitur nec sensus propter materialem substantiam, nec intellectualis in nobis potentia propter sensus operatur. CAPUT XVI Quod proprie hominis anima rationalis et sit et dica­ tur, et quod anima per totum corpus fusa nusquam certam sedem habeat.
But everything material and corporeal, which is in change and alteration, if indeed it partakes of the animate power, obtains its motion through increase. But if it withdraws from the operation of life, it will attest its motion by corruption. Therefore neither does sense operate on account of the material substance, nor does the intellectual power in us operate on account of the senses. CHAPTER XVI. That properly the soul of man both is and is called rational, and that the soul, poured through the whole body, nowhere has a fixed seat.
但一切物質的、有形的、處於變化與更易之中的東西,若果真分享了那賦予生命的能力,便藉增長而得著其運動。但若它從生命的運作中退離,便要藉敗壞來見證其運動。因此,感覺並非為著物質的本質而運作,我們裡面的理智之能也並非為著感官而運作。第十六章。論人的靈魂正當地既是、也被稱為理性的,又論靈魂遍佈於全身,卻無處有固定的座位。
9:113
Quod quædam de creaturis hac vi tantummodo nituntur, qua nutriuntur et crescunt, aliæ vero sen­ suum potentia prævalent, et nec illa sensibilis, nec ista rationalis participantia probamur esse substan­ tiæ, idcirco quis animarum esse multitudinem suspi­ cetur, cum differentiam earum non competenti ra­ tione definiat, quia omne quidquid in rebus es!, siquidem perfecte et integre vocatur, proprie constat esse quod dicitur. Si autcm non per omnia, quod appellatur existat, inane nomen ei putatur ascriptum, ut puta quod rerum vim non demonstret, dicimus enim proprie subjecto nomen imponere.
Since certain creatures rely only on this power by which they are nourished and grow, while others prevail by the power of the senses—and these are proved to partake neither of that sensible nor of this rational substance—on this account someone might suspect that there is a multitude of souls, since he does not define their difference by a fitting reason; for whatever exists in things, if indeed it is called so perfectly and wholly, properly is what it is said to be. But if it does not exist in all respects as what it is called, an empty name is thought to be ascribed to it—as, for instance, that it does not display the force of the thing; for we say that a name is properly imposed upon a subject.
既然某些受造物僅倚靠這藉以受養與生長的能力,另一些卻憑感官之能而居優——而牠們被證明既不分享那感覺的、也不分享這理性的本質——因此有人或會疑心靈魂有眾多之數,因他未以恰當的理由界定牠們的差異;因為凡在事物中存在之物,若果真完全而整全地如此稱呼,便正當地就是它所被稱的那樣。但若它並非在一切方面都實是其所被稱者,那名便被認為是空泛地加給它的——譬如說,它並不顯出該物的實質;因為我們說,名乃是正當地加於其所指的主體之上。
9:114
Quod si quis ex lapide fabrefactam similitudinem veri panis osten­ tet, cui et forma quidem ipsa sit, et magnitudo ejus videatur æqualis, nec non et eamdem coloris simili­ tudinem præferat, ita ut mulis indiciis verus pute­ tur, desit autem illi quod cibus possit existere, id­ circo jam lapidem proprie vel naturalitLer, non nisi abusive panis appellationem dicimus accepisse, lieni cætera juxta eamdem rationem quae non sunt per omnia quod dicuntur, habent ex abusione vocabu­ lum.
But if someone should display a likeness of true bread, fashioned out of stone, to which the very form belongs, whose magnitude appears equal, and which moreover presents the same likeness of color, so that by many tokens it is thought to be true—yet there is lacking to it the power to be food—on that account we say that the stone has received the appellation of 'bread' not properly or naturally, but only by abuse; just as other things, according to the same reasoning, which are not in all respects what they are called, have their name from abuse.
但若有人拿出一個用石頭製成、酷似真餅的東西,它既有那真餅的形狀,其大小看似相等,又呈現同樣的顏色擬態,以致憑許多跡象被當作真餅——然而它卻缺乏能作食物的功能——因此我們便說,這石頭得著「餅」這名稱,並非正當地或依其本性,乃只是濫用而已;正如其餘事物,照同樣的道理,凡並非在一切方面都實是其所被稱者,皆是出於濫用而得其名。
9:115
Sic igitur et anima cum perfectionem in ratione et intellectu prorsus obtineat, omne quidquid hæc non est, xquivocc quidem anima potest esse, non tamen vere dicitur anima, sed est vitalis quaedam ef­ ficientia quae per abusionem anima nuncupatur. Propter quod et irrationabilium naturas tanquam non procul existentes a surculari vcl seminali vita, dedit ad usus hominum Deus qui de singulis quibusque justitiam legis suæ affixit, ut hi qui eorum vescuntur carnibus, pro oleribus habeant. Omnes enim carnes manducabitis sicut olera feni.
Thus, therefore, the soul too, since it possesses its perfection wholly in reason and intellect, whatever is not this can indeed be a soul equivocally, yet is not truly called a soul, but is a certain vital efficiency which by abuse is named a soul. On which account God, who has affixed to each several thing the justice of His law, gave for the uses of men the natures of irrational creatures, as not standing far from a sprouting or seminal life, so that those who feed upon their flesh might have them in the place of vegetables. For 'you shall eat all flesh as the green herbs.'
因此,靈魂也是這樣:既然它完全在理性與理智中擁有其完美,凡不是這理性與理智的,固然可以同名地稱為靈魂,卻不真正被稱為靈魂,乃是某種生命的功效,藉濫用而被名為靈魂。為此,那將其律法的公義加諸萬物各類的神,把無理性受造物的本性賜給人作使用之需,因牠們離那發芽或種子的生命並不遙遠,好讓那些吃牠們肉的人,可以把牠們當作菜蔬。因為「凡活物你們都可吃,像吃青菜一樣。」
9:116
Parum namque plus ::abere videntur per sensuum vegetationem, quam illa quibus aluntur, et quibus crementa percipiunt, quæ res instruat amatores carnium, non multis sen­ sibilibus animum suum nectere, sed magis spiritali­ bus privilegiisoccupari, quod in bis vere animæ con­ spiciantur effectus. Nam in rebus carnalibus irratio- nabiles nobis sunt compares et æquales. Sed in aliud nescio quomodo consequentia sermonis inflexa est:
For they seem to have but a little more, through the vegetation of the senses, than the things by which they are nourished and from which they receive their growth. Let this fact instruct the lovers of flesh not to fasten their soul to many sensible things, but rather to be occupied with spiritual privileges, since in these the effects of the soul are truly beheld. For in carnal things the irrational creatures are our equals and peers. But somehow the consequence of the discourse has been bent into another direction:
因為牠們藉感官的生發,所多有的不過比那養活牠們、使牠們得以生長之物略多一點。願這事實教導愛肉之人,不要把自己的靈魂繫於眾多可感之物,倒要專注於屬靈的特權,因為靈魂的功效真正在這些事上被看見。因為在屬肉體的事上,無理性的受造物與我們是同等而相齊的。但不知怎地,論述的推演已轉向了別的方向:
9:117
uon enim hoc erat in contemplatione propositum, ut quid esset excellentius in homine, utrum mentis operatio aut substantia materialis, inquireret, sed quod in aliqua parte eorum quæ in nobis sunt mens essel innexa, sequaliter autem in omnibus et per om­ nia sese diffundat, et nec extrinsecus contineat, nec contineatur intrinsecus. Hæc enim forma in cadisaut in situlis aliisque similibus vasis atque corporibus, quæ se sua capacitate continent proprie pervidetur :
for this was not the thing set forth for contemplation—to inquire what is more excellent in man, whether the operation of the mind or the material substance—but that the mind, while interwoven in some part of the things that are in us, equally in all and through all diffuses itself, and is neither contained from without nor contained within. For this 'being contained' is properly perceived in jars or buckets and other like vessels and bodies, which contain by their own capacity that which they hold:
因為擺在默觀之前的並非此事——去探究人裡面何者更為卓越,是心智的運作抑或物質的本質——乃是要查明:心智雖在我們裡面諸物的某一部分中交織相連,卻均勻地遍佈於萬有之中、貫穿一切而擴散自己,既不從外被包含,也不被包含於內。因為這種「被包含」的型態,乃是正當地在瓶罐、桶子以及其他類似的器皿與物體中被察見,這些物以其自身的容量盛裝其所容之物:
9:118
communio vero mentis ad corpus ineffabilem quam­ dam et incomprehensibilem copulam habere cogno­ scitur, nec interius existens, quia res incorporea nequit corpore contineri, nec exterius circumfusu vel ambiens, sed invisibili quodammodo et inexplo­ rata ratione naturæ conjuncta atque connexa, in ipsa, et circa ipsam prorsus inspicitur eo (ut dixi) modo, quo nec intelligi potest omnino nec dici, nisi quod juxta proprium ordinem eadem valente natura mens quoque suos effectus exerceat. Si autem de­ licto quodam natura nutaverit, etiam motus mentis titubare necesse est. CAPUT XVII.
but the communion of the mind with the body is known to have a certain ineffable and incomprehensible bond—neither existing within, since an incorporeal thing cannot be contained by a body, nor surrounding or encompassing it from without, but joined and connected by an invisible and unsearchable principle of nature; it is beheld in it and around it, in that manner (as I have said) in which it can neither be understood at all nor uttered, save that, as long as that same nature retains its proper order, the mind too exercises its operations. But if nature wavers through some fault, the motion of the mind too must necessarily totter. CHAPTER XVII.
但心智與身體的相通,已知有某種不可言喻、不可測度的聯結——它既不存在於內,因為無形之物不能被身體所包含;也不從外環繞或包圍它,乃是藉一種不可見、不可探究的本性之理而相聯相繫;它在身體之內、又在其周圍被察見,正是以那種(如我所說)既全然不能被理解、也不能被言說的方式,只能說:只要那同一本性保守其本有的秩序,心智也就施展其運作。但若本性因某種過失而動搖,心智的運作也必然隨之蹣跚。第十七章。
9:119
Enarratio divini sermonis quo dicitur, Faciamus homi­ nem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram, in quo perquiritur quæ sit ralio, et in quo simile sii beatæ et impassibili naturæ hoc passibile nostrum et mortale, et quemadmodum in imagine masculus ap­ probetur et femina, cum in primaeva forma minime exstare videantur. Sed assumamus iterum divinae vocis oraeulum : Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram, quam parva atque indigna nonnulli externo­ rum de magnificentia hominis suspicati sunt, qui eum collatione mundi hujus extollere putaverunt. Dixerunt enim parvum mundum esse hominem, de ipsis exstantem universalibus elementis.
An exposition of the divine word in which it is said, 'Let us make man to our image and likeness,' wherein is investigated what the reason is, and in what respect this passible and mortal nature of ours is like to the blessed and impassible nature; and how in the image male is approved and female, although in the primeval form they seem in no wise to exist. But let us take up again the oracle of the divine voice: 'Let us make man to our image and likeness.' How small and unworthy a thing some of the outsiders have surmised concerning the magnificence of man, who thought to exalt him by comparison with this world! For they said that man is a little world, consisting of these same universal elements.
這是對神聖之言的闡釋,那言說:「我們要照著我們的形像、按著我們的樣式造人」,於中所探究的是:其理為何,又我們這可受苦、會朽壞的本性,在何處相似於那有福的、不受苦的本性;以及在那形像中如何分出男與女,雖然在最初的型態中,男女似乎全然不存在。但讓我們再次拿起神聖之聲的諭示:「我們要照著我們的形像、按著我們的樣式造人。」一些外邦人對人之尊榮所臆測的,是何等渺小而不配——他們以為把人與這世界相比便是抬舉了他!因為他們說,人是一個小世界,由這同樣的普遍元素所構成。
9:120
Sed enim qui tanta jactantia nominis hujuscemodi humanæ substantiæ contulerunt, sui prorsus obliti sunt, dum ex proprietatibus muris et culicis præconia hominis inepta finxerunt. Nam et illis ex quatuor elementis nntura compacta est, et circa omnes animantes ho­ rum elementorum plus minusve quædam portio cer­ nitur, sine qua subsistere ea quæ utuntur sensibus omnino non poterunt. Quid igitur amplum, si ad mundi figuram vel similitudinem putetur homo præ- ferri, coeli quod transit, terrae vero quæ mutatur, et omnium quæ in bis continentur continentium tran­ situ, pari conditione labenthim?
But indeed those who with such boasting have conferred a name of this kind upon human substance have utterly forgotten themselves, while out of the properties of a mouse and a gnat they have feigned inept praises of man. For in those creatures too nature is compacted out of four elements, and around all living things some portion, more or less, of these elements is discerned, without which the things that use the senses could in no wise subsist. What then is great, if man be thought to be set forth as the figure or likeness of the world—of the heaven that passes away, of the earth that is changed, and of all the things contained in them, perishing by a like condition along with the transit of their containers?
但那些以如此自誇把這等名稱加於人之本質的人,竟全然忘了自己,因他們從老鼠與蚊蚋的特性,杜撰出對人那些不倫的讚辭。因為在那些動物裡面,本性也是由四元素所結成的,而圍繞著一切有生之物,都可察見這些元素或多或少的某種份量,若無這些,那些運用感官之物便絕不能存續。那麼,若以為人是被當作這世界的形狀或樣式而被高舉,這有何偉大可言呢?——這世界乃是那將逝去的天、那被更易的地,以及這天地中所含一切之物,皆以相同的境況、隨其所容之物的流逝而消亡。
9:121
Sed in quo sit juxta ecclesiasticam rationem hominis magnitudo, non in eo quod ad similitudinem mundi est conditus, sed ad imaginem factus est Creatoris. Fortassis enim quæ sit imaginis ratio quæras, quomodo incorporeo cor­ porale sit simile, quod temporale est sempiterno, et incommutabili id quod continuis motibus immutatur, impassibili etiam et incorruptibili quod passioni et corruptioni subjectum est, et ei qui sine malitia est ulla id quod semper in malitia et defectione versa­ tur. Multum namque distat inter primævam formam, et eam quae ad similitudinem cjus facta est. Imago quippe, si servet principalis formae similitudinem, vere imago et proprie imago dicitur.
But wherein lies the greatness of man according to the ecclesiastical reasoning? Not in that he was created after the likeness of the world, but in that he was made to the image of the Creator. Perhaps you will ask what is the reason of the image—how the corporeal can be like the incorporeal, how the temporal can be like the eternal, how that which is changed by continual motions can be like the immutable, that which is subject to passion and corruption like the impassible and incorruptible, and that which is ever engaged in malice and defect like Him who is without any malice. For there is a great distance between the primeval form and that which is made to its likeness. For the image, if it preserves the likeness of the principal form, is truly and properly called an image.
但按教會的道理,人的偉大究竟何在?不在乎他是照世界的樣式被造,乃在乎他是按造物主的形像而被造。或許你會問,這形像之理為何——有形之物怎能相似於無形之物,屬時間者怎能相似於永恆者,受連續運動更易者怎能相似於不變者,受制於受苦與朽壞者怎能相似於不受苦、不朽壞者,又那永遠陷於惡與虧缺者,怎能相似於那毫無惡的神?因為在最初的型態與那照其樣式所造之物之間,有極大的距離。因為那形像,若保守了原型的樣式,便真正而正當地被稱為形像。
9:122
Si vero ab ejus imita­ tione discedat, aliud quiddam esse monstratur. Quo­ modo ergo mortalis homo purissimæ illius et immorta­ lis naturæ semperque subsistentis imago esse probabi­ tui ? De his itaque solam veram rationem ipsa veritas evidenter aguoscit. Nos autem, quantum capere possu­ mus, quibusdam conjecturis atque conjectationibus veritatem ipsam sedulo investigantes, hoc arbitramur esse quod quæritur, de quo nos necdivina fallit oratio, quæ ad imaginem Dei factum hominem retulit, nec hu­ manæ naturae deflenda miseria est, quia beatæ illius et impassibilis vitæ similitudinem gerit.
But if it departs from the imitation of it, it is shown to be something else. How then shall mortal man be proved to be the image of that most pure and immortal nature, ever-subsisting? Concerning these things, therefore, Truth itself alone clearly recognizes the true reason. But we, as far as we are able to grasp, diligently investigating the truth itself by certain conjectures and surmises, judge this to be the thing that is sought—concerning which neither does the divine discourse deceive us, which referred to man as made to the image of God, nor is the misery of human nature to be bewailed, since it bears the likeness of that blessed and impassible life.
但若它離開了對原型的摹倣,便顯出是別的東西。那麼,會死的人怎能被證明是那至純、不朽、永遠自存之本性的形像呢?因此,關於這些事,唯有真理自己清楚認識其真正的道理。但我們,盡我們所能領會的,藉某些推測與臆度殷勤地探究真理本身,便判定所尋求的乃是這事——關於此,那論及人乃照神的形像而造的神聖之言並不欺哄我們,人之本性的悲慘也不當被哀哭,因為它承載著那有福而不受苦之生命的樣式。
9:123
Neeessc est au­ tem e duobus alterum confiteri, ut si quis comparet Deo quod nostrum ost, aut passibilem divinam aut im­ passibilem humanam putet esse substantiam, velut æquitatibus istis substantiæ similitudo rationis in utrisque cernatur. Si vero ueque Divinitas in pas­ sione est, neque nostr passionibus probantur exce­ pta, putas quæ altera relinquitur ratio secundum quam divinam vocem veracem esse dicamus, quæ imaginem Dei hominem esse testata est? Igitur eam­ dem scripturam sumamus universam, si quomodo per eam nobis aliqua declaratio ad id quod quæritur elucescat. Posteaquam dixit :
But it is necessary to confess one of two things: that if anyone should compare to God what is ours, he must think either the divine substance passible or the human impassible—as though, by these equalizings, a likeness of reason in the substance were discerned in both. But if the Divinity is not in passion, nor are we proved exempt from passions, what other reason, do you suppose, is left, according to which we may say that divine word to be truthful which has testified that man is the image of God? Therefore let us take up the same Scripture in its entirety, to see whether through it some declaration may shine forth to us for what is sought. After it had said:
但必須承認二者之一:若有人把屬我們的與神相比,他就必以為,或是神聖的本質可受苦,或是人的本質不受苦——彷彿藉這等相等,在二者中都可察見本質上理之相似。但若神性既不在受苦之中,我們也未被證明免於諸般受苦,你想,還剩下什麼別的道理,能使我們說那見證人乃神之形像的神聖之言是真實的呢?因此,讓我們把同一段經文整全地拿來,看看能否藉它向我們發出某種對所求之事的闡明。在它說了:
9:124
Faciamus hominem, et ad quam rem factus est indicavit, inferens quod fecit Deus ad imaginem, ad imaginem Dei fecit eum, masculum et feminam fecit eos. Jain vero in supe­ rioribus dictum est quod ad destructionem impietatis hæreticæ sententia ista processerit, qua competenter instruimur, quod feccrit hominem unigenitus Deus ad imaginem Dei, ut nulla ratione divinitatem Patris et Filii discernere moliamur, cum aequaliter divina Scriptura Deum utrumque fateatur, et eum qui fecit hominem, et cum ad cujus imaginem factus est. Sed de his nunc omittatur assertio.
'Let us make man,' and indicated for what purpose he was made, adding that 'God made him to the image; to the image of God He made him; male and female He made them.' Now it has already been said above that this sentence proceeded unto the overthrow of the heretics' impiety, by which we are fittingly instructed that the only-begotten God made man to the image of God, so that by no reasoning may we attempt to distinguish the divinity of the Father and the Son, since divine Scripture equally confesses both to be God—both Him who made man, and Him to whose image he was made. But concerning these things let the assertion now be omitted.
「我們要造人」,並指明他是為何而被造,補充說:「神照著形像造他,照著神的形像造他;造男造女。」如今在前文已說過,這話乃是為了推翻異端者的不虔而提出的,藉此我們得以恰當地受教:獨生的神照著神的形像造了人,使我們絕不以任何道理試圖分別父與子的神性,因為神聖的經文同等地承認二者皆是神——既是那造人者,也是那按其形像造人者。但關於這些事,如今暫且擱下這論斷。
9:125
Vertamur autem ad propositam quæstionem, quomodo divina quidem na­ tura beata sit, et eam quae similis ei est miseram Scriptura commemoret. Igitur verba ipsa diligeulius exploremus, et inveniemus aliud quiddam esse quod ad imaginem Dei factum est, aliud vero quod nunc in miseria pervidetur. Fecit, inquit, Deus hominem; ad imaginem Dei fecit illum; finita est ejus qui factus est ad imaginem Dei conditio. Deinde adjungitur velut de eadem conditione sermo, cum dicitur : Masculum et (eminam fecit eos. Cunctis autem reor esse notis- sinuum, quod idipsum ab illa primæva forma intelli­ gitur alienum.
Let us turn, however, to the proposed question: how the divine nature is indeed blessed, and yet Scripture records as wretched that which is like to it. Let us therefore explore the very words more diligently, and we shall find that one thing is what was made to the image of God, and another what is now beheld in misery. 'God made man,' it says; 'to the image of God He made him'—here is finished the constitution of him who was made to the image of God. Then there is appended, as it were, a discourse concerning the same constitution, when it is said: 'Male and female He made them.' But I think it is most well-known to all that this very thing is understood to be alien from that primeval form.
然而,讓我們轉向所提出的問題:神聖的本性既是有福的,經文怎麼又記述那相似於它之物為悲慘呢?因此,讓我們更殷勤地探究這些字句,便要發覺:照神形像所造的是一事,如今在悲慘中所見的又是另一事。經上說:「神造人」,「照著神的形像造他」——照神形像被造者的構成,到此便完結了。其後又彷彿就同一構成接著論說,因為經上說:「造男造女。」但我想眾人都極熟知,這同一件事被理解為與那最初的型態相異。
9:126
In Christo namque Jeau, sicut dicit Apostolus, neque masculus, neque femina, sed quia per hæc divisit hominem sermo divinus, duplex quæ­ dam probatur naturæ nostrae formatio, et ea quæ divinam refert similitudinem, et ea quæ ab ista dif­ ferre monstratur. Aliquid enim tale contestatio rela­ tionis insinuat, primum quidem dicens, quia fecit Deus hominem; ad imaginem Dei fecit eum. itemque subjiciens, quia masculum et feminam fecit eos. Hoc autem in his quae de Deo sentiuntur probatur extra­ neum, sed arbitror ego per hæc quae a Scriptura sancta dicuntur magnum atque sublime dogma de­ clarare, quod tale esse pervideo:
For in Christ Jesus, as the Apostle says, there is neither male nor female; but because by these the divine word divided man, a certain twofold formation of our nature is proved—both that which reflects the divine likeness, and that which is shown to differ from it. For the attestation of the account intimates something of this kind, first saying that 'God made man; to the image of God He made him,' and then subjoining that 'male and female He made them.' This latter, however, is proved to be foreign among the things that are understood of God; but I judge that through these words spoken by Holy Scripture a great and sublime doctrine is declared, which I perceive to be of this kind:
因為,正如使徒所說,在基督耶穌裡並無男或女;但因神聖之言藉這些區分了人,便證明我們本性有某種雙重的形成——既有那反映神聖樣式的,也有那顯出與之相異的。因為這相關的見證暗示某種這樣的事,首先說:「神造人,照著神的形像造他」,繼而附加說:「造男造女。」然而,後者在那些論及神的事中被證明是外來的;但我判定,藉著聖經所說的這些話,宣告了一個偉大而崇高的教義,我察覺它是這樣的:
9:127
duabus rebus secun­ dum summitates ab invicem separatis mediam buma- nam esse substantiam, inter divinam scilicet incorpo­ reamque et irralionabilem brutamque naturam. Nam utriusque rei ratio in hominis conformatione con­ spicimur : divina quidem, hoc quod rationalis et intel­ lectualis est, quod etiam masculi ac feminæ differen­ tiam refugit; irrationalis, hoc quod corpoream con­ stitutionem in masculum divisam gestat et feminam (in his enim utrisque versantur universa quibus continetur humana substantia); sed prælatum esse et quod in nobis intellectuale est ei rei quæ humanæ propagationi servire videmus, ordine ipso conditio- IUS exsequente didicimus.
that human substance is intermediate between two things separated from one another at their extremes—namely, between the divine and incorporeal nature, and the irrational and brutish nature. For the reason of both is beheld in the constitution of man: the divine, in that he is rational and intellectual, which also shuns the distinction of male and female; the irrational, in that he bears a corporeal constitution divided into male and female (for in both of these are engaged all the things by which human substance is contained); but that what is intellectual in us is set above the thing which we see serving human propagation, we have learned by the very order of the creation that follows.
就是說,人的本質乃居於兩件在其兩極彼此分隔之物的中間——即介於神聖無形的本性與無理性、粗野的本性之間。因為這兩者之理都在人的構成中被察見:神聖的一面,在於他是有理性、有理智的,這也使他超脫男女之別;無理性的一面,在於他承載著分為男女的有形構成(因為人之本質所含的一切,都在這兩面中運行);但我們裡面那屬理智的,乃被置於我們所見那服事人類繁衍之物之上,這是我們從隨後創造的次序本身學得的。
9:128
Ad effectum quippe gene­ rationis quædam est hominis cum irrationabilibus intata conjunctio. Primum igitur ait quia fecit Deus hominem, ad imaginem Dei fecit eum : ostendit per hoc id quod supra diximus Apostolum delinisse, quia in Christo Jesu neque masculus neque femina. Deindc intulit quod humanae naturae proprietates exprime­ ret, masculum et feminam fecit eos. Nec me quispiam culpet quod propositæ rationis intelligentiam videar ex alto deducere; Deus enim naturaliter existens quidquid boni cogitatione complectimur, imo potius omni bono quod aut intelligi potest aut comprehen­ di praestantior, non ob aliam causam creavit homi­ nem nisi quia bonus est.
For unto the effect of generation there is a certain conjunction of man with the irrational creatures, grafted in. First, then, it says that 'God made man, to the image of God He made him'—showing by this what we said above the Apostle defined, that 'in Christ Jesus there is neither male nor female.' Then it brought in what would express the properties of human nature: 'male and female He made them.' Nor let anyone blame me as though I seem to derive the understanding of the proposed reasoning from on high; for God, naturally existing as whatever good we embrace in thought—nay rather more excellent than every good that can be either understood or comprehended—created man for no other cause than because He is good.
因為為著生育的果效,人與無理性受造物之間有某種接植而成的聯合。所以,經上首先說:「神造人,照著神的形像造他」——藉此顯出我們上面所說使徒所界定的:「在基督耶穌裡並無男或女。」其後又引入那要表達人性特質的話:「造男造女。」也不要有人責備我,彷彿我把所提道理的理解從高處推衍而來;因為神,依其本性既是我們在思想中所能領會的一切美善——不,毋寧說祂超越一切可被理解或被領悟的美善——祂造人別無他故,乃因祂本是良善的。
9:129
Talis ergo cum sit, et pro­ pterea naturæ formatioris exstiterit creator, nequa­ quam imperfectam virtutem suæ bonitatis ostendit, ut aliquid ex his quas ei suppetunt daret, aliquid vcro invidia cogente subtraheret, sed perfectæ bonitalis species in eo est, ut hominem qui non erat in gene rationem produceret, bonorumque participem face­ ret. Quia vero bonorum ipsorum multa probatur esse congestio, quæ non possit numero facile compre­ hendi, idcirco generali quadam voce universa simul Scriptura complectens significare curavit, cum ad imaginem Dei factum hominem retulit. Æquale enim est hoc, ac si diceret, humanam Maturam omnis boni factam esse participem:
Being therefore such, and on that account having stood forth as the creator of the forming nature, He in no wise displayed an imperfect power of His goodness, as though He gave something of the things at His command, yet withheld something through the compulsion of envy; but the form of perfect goodness is in this, that He brought forth into being man who was not, and made him a partaker of good things. But since there is proved to be a great heaping-together of those very goods, which could not easily be comprehended by number, therefore Scripture, embracing all things together by a certain general expression, took care to signify them when it referred to man as made to the image of God. For this is equivalent, as if it said that human nature was made a partaker of every good:
祂既是這樣,又因此而成為那形塑之本性的創造者,祂便絕未顯出其良善有缺欠的能力,彷彿祂把祂手中所有的賜了一些,卻因嫉妒的逼迫而扣下另一些;其實完全良善的形態正在於此:祂使本不存在的人進入存在,並使他成為諸般美善的分享者。但既然這些美善被證明有極大的積聚,多得難以用數目來計算,因此經文便以某種總括的話語把萬有一同囊括,並用心加以表明,就是當它論及人乃照神的形像而造之時。因為這等於說:人性被造成為一切美善的分享者:
9:130
si enim bonitatis est pleni­ tudo divinitas, et bujus homo imago cst, profecto et in plenitudine sit omnis boni hæc imago, juxta pri­ mævam formam similitudinem possidet. Est igitur iti nobis totius boni conditio, totiusque virtutis et sa­ pientiae, et quidquid illud est quod optimuin possit intelligi, præ omnibus vero quod ab omni necessi­ tate liberi sumus, nec subjugati quadam naturali po- tentia, sed arbitrio proprio ad consilium quod pla­ cuerit inclinamus; virtus enim spontanea quaedam res est, et nullius subjecta dominio. Quod autem quadam necessitate coactum est, virtus esse jati non potest.
for if the fullness of goodness is the Divinity, and man is the image of this, then assuredly this image too is in the fullness of every good, possessing the likeness according to the primeval form. There is therefore in us the constitution of every good, and of all virtue and wisdom, and whatever else can be understood as best; but above all, that we are free from all necessity, not subjugated by any natural power, but by our own choice incline toward the counsel that has pleased us. For virtue is a spontaneous thing, and subject to the dominion of none. But that which is forced by some necessity cannot any longer be virtue.
因為若良善的豐盛便是神性,而人是這神性的形像,那麼這形像必然也在一切美善的豐盛之中,照那最初的型態擁有其樣式。因此,在我們裡面有一切美善的構成,有全備的德行與智慧,以及凡能被理解為至善之物;但首要的是,我們得以脫離一切必然性的轄制,不被任何自然之能所奴役,乃憑自己的抉擇傾向那中我們意的籌算。因為德行乃是出於自願之事,不受任何之物的轄制。但凡被某種必然性所強迫的,便不能再算為德行。
9:131
Cum ergo pene in omnibus primævæ formae pulchritudinem formamque imago demonstret, nisi in aliquo differat, jam non erit similitudo, sed ipsum atque æquate illi per omnia demonstrabitur, quod in omnibus immutabile comprobatur. In quo ergo Divinitatis et simililudinis ejus distantiam per­ videmus? In hoc procul dubio, quod Divinitas in­ creata est, hæc autem creationi subsistit, quæ pro­ prietatis differentia rursus aliarum proprietatum consequentiam protulit. Occurrit enim cunctis indu­ bitata professio, quod iucreata natura incommutabi- lis sit et semper eodem modo permaneat, creatura vero non possit siue mutatione persistere.
Since therefore in almost all respects the image displays the beauty and form of the primeval form, unless it differed in some respect, it would no longer be a likeness, but would be shown to be the very thing and equal to it in all respects—which is proved to be immutable in all things. In what, then, do we perceive the distance between the Divinity and its likeness? In this, without doubt, that the Divinity is uncreated, whereas this subsists by creation—which difference of property has in turn brought forth a consequence of other properties. For an undoubted profession occurs to all, that the uncreated nature is immutable and ever remains in the same manner, but the creature cannot persist without change.
因此,既然那形像幾乎在一切方面都顯出最初型態的美麗與形狀,倘若它不在某方面有所差異,便不再是樣式,反倒要被顯為那物本身、並在一切方面與它相等——而那原型被證明在凡事上是不變的。那麼,我們在何處察見神性與其樣式之間的距離呢?無疑就在這一點:神性是非受造的,而這形像卻是藉受造而存在——這屬性上的差異,又進而帶出其他屬性的相應後果。因為人人都會生出一個無可置疑的承認:非受造的本性是不變的,永遠以同一方式存留,而受造之物卻不能不經更易而存續。
9:132
Ipse de­ nique ex nihilo ad existentiam transitus, motus qui­ dam erat atque conversio, cum non existens ad essentiam divino consilio transmutatur. Et sicut im­ pressam in aere figuram sanctum Evangelium Cæsaris appellat imaginem, per quod addiscimus quod juxta figuram quidem similitudo Cæsaris, in subjecto au­ tem differentia ejus appareat, ita et in prædictis ra­ tione pro figuris sunt ea quae in contemplatione divinae natura humanaeque cernuntur; eorom quibus eadem similitudo est, in subjecto prorsus differen­ tiam reperimus, quam intuitu mentis increata natura creataque conspicimus.
For the very transit from nothing to existence was a certain motion and conversion, when the non-existent is transmuted into being by the divine counsel. And just as the holy Gospel calls the figure impressed on the coin the 'image of Caesar'—whereby we learn that according to the figure there is a likeness of Caesar, while in the underlying subject his difference appears—so also in the aforesaid matters the figures, by analogy, are those things which are beheld in the contemplation of the divine and human nature; in those things in which there is the same likeness, we find a difference wholly in the subject, which by the gaze of the mind we behold as uncreated and created nature.
因為那從無到有的過渡本身,便是某種運動與轉變,乃是那不存在者藉神聖的籌算被變化為存在。又正如神聖的福音把鑄印在錢幣上的形狀稱為「該撒的像」——藉此我們得知,按其形狀有該撒的樣式,而在那承載之主體中卻顯出它的差異——照樣,在前述諸事中,那藉類比而為「形狀」的,乃是那些在默觀神聖本性與人之本性時所察見之物;在那些有同樣樣式之物中,我們發覺在主體中全然有一種差異,這差異我們藉心智的注視而視為非受造與受造的本性。
9:133
Quoniam igitur Divinitas ipsa semper est, homo vero per creationem tactui e x mutatione cœpit existere, cognationemque quam­ dam videtur habere cum natura vertibili : idcirco qui novit omnia antequam fiant, sicnt propheta pro­ miserat, providens atque prospiciers virtute præ.. scientiæ suæ in quæ declinaret juxta spontaneam voluntatem humani motus arbitrii, id quod futurum erat inspexit, tribuens imagini differentiam maris et feminæ, quæ jam non ad divinam formam principa- lemque respiceret, sed, uti dictum est, irrationabili naturæ propinquare videretur. Causam vero tanti hujus artificis soli quidem illi inlelligunl, qui verita­ tem propriis oculis intuentur, et verbi ministri sunt;
Since therefore the Divinity itself ever is, but man through creation began to exist out of change, and seems to have a certain kinship with the changeable nature—therefore He who knows all things before they come to be, as the prophet had promised, foreseeing and looking ahead by the power of His foreknowledge to what the motion of human choice would incline according to its spontaneous will, beheld that which was to be, bestowing upon the image the difference of male and female, which would no longer look to the divine and principal form, but, as has been said, would seem to draw near to the irrational nature. But the cause of so great an Artificer only those indeed understand who behold the truth with their own eyes and are ministers of the Word;
因此,既然神性本身永遠存在,而人卻是藉受造、出於更易而開始存在,並似乎與那可變的本性有某種親緣——所以那位在萬事成就之先便知曉一切的主,正如先知所應許的,藉其預知之能預先看見、先行察看人意的運動將照其自願的意志傾向何處,便預見那將要發生之事,賜給那形像男女之別,這分別不再朝向那神聖而為首的型態,乃如前所說,似乎趨近於無理性的本性。但這位如此偉大之工匠的緣由,唯有那些用自己的眼睛注視真理、並作道的執事的人才明白;
9:134
nos autem, sicut est possibile, conjecturis quibusdam atque indiciis veritatis vestigia prosequentes, quod incidit animo, non enuntialivo modo proferimus, sed exercitii loco devotis auditoribus intimamus. Quid est ergo quod de his excogitare potuimus? Dicens Scriptura divina, quia fecit Deus hominem, indefinita significantia omne hominum genus ostendit. Non enim nunc Adam in conditione nominatus est, sicut et in consequentibus declarat historia : sed nomen homini creato, non cuilibet homini generale est. Hinc ergo ex hac generali naturx appellatione, tale quid excogitare compellimur, quod divina virtus atque præscientia omnem humanam naturam in prima conditione complexa esse videatur.
but we, as far as is possible, pursuing the traces of truth by certain conjectures and tokens, set forth what has come into our mind, not in an assertive manner, but by way of exercise we impart it to devout hearers. What then is it that we have been able to think out concerning these things? When divine Scripture says that 'God made man,' by an indefinite signification it shows the whole race of men. For Adam is not here named in the constitution, as the narrative also declares in what follows; but the name belongs to the man created, generally, not to any particular man. Hence, then, from this general appellation of nature, we are compelled to think out something of this kind: that the divine power and foreknowledge embraced all human nature in the first constitution.
但我們,盡力之所及,藉某些推測與真理的跡象追尋真理的蹤影,便把所湧入心中的陳明出來,並非以斷言的方式,乃是以操練的方式向虔誠的聽眾傳述。那麼,關於這些事,我們能思想出什麼呢?當神聖的經文說「神造人」時,它以一種不定的意指顯出全人類。因為亞當在此並非在創造中被點名,正如隨後的記述所宣明的;乃是這名概括地屬於那被造的「人」,而非屬於任何個別之人。因此,從這對本性的總稱,我們不得不思想出某種這樣的事:神聖的大能與預知,在最初的創造中便囊括了全人類的本性。
9:135
Opor!et enim Deo nihil indefinitum in his quæ ab eo creata sunt æstimare, sed singulis eorum quæ sunt esse modum certissimum Creatoris sapientia terminatum. Sicut enim quilibet hic homo quantitate corporis tcr­ minatur, modusque substantiae ejus est qualitas, quæ simul cum superficie corporis explicatur, sic arbitror velut in uno quodam corpore, totam pleni­ tudinem humanitatis ab universitatis auctore prae­ scientiæ virtute complexam : et hoc Scripturam in­ sinuare, cum dicit: Et fecit Deus hominem; ad ima­ ginem Dei fecit illum.
For one must reckon that nothing among the things created by God is indefinite, but that for each of the things that are there is a most certain mode, bounded by the wisdom of the Creator. For just as any particular man here is bounded by the quantity of his body, and the measure of his substance is its quality, which is unfolded together with the surface of the body—so I judge that, as it were in some single body, the whole fullness of humanity was embraced by the Author of the universe through the power of foreknowledge; and that Scripture intimates this when it says: 'And God made man; to the image of God He made him.'
因為當認定:在神所造之物中,沒有什麼是不定的,乃是凡存在之物各有其極確定的限度,受造物主的智慧所界定。因為正如此處任何個別之人都受其身體之量所限定,其本質的尺度乃是其質,這質與身體的表面一同展開——照樣,我判定,那宇宙萬有的創作者,彷彿在某一個單一的身體之中,藉預知之能囊括了人性的全備豐盛;並且經文暗示此事,當它說:「神造人,照著神的形像造他。」
9:136
Non onim imago hæc in parte naturae est, nec in uno aliquo qui in singularitate propria cernitur ista gratia terminatur, sed in omne genus actualiter hæc talis et tanta potentia virtutis excurrit. Hujus autem rei signum est, quod mens æqualiter omnibus inserta est : universis autem co­ gitandi et recogitandi constat inesse rationem, ex­ tera omnia quibus divinæ naturæsimilitudo declara­ tur, in eo quod ad imaginem Dei factus agnoscitur. Sive enim ille qui prima mundi est conditione for­ matus, sivc hic qui post consummationem totius mundi futurus est, æqualiter in se divinam præferTe probatur imaginem.
For this image is not in a part of nature, nor is this grace bounded in some one individual who is beheld in his own singularity; but this power of so great a virtue runs out actually into the whole race. And a sign of this is that the mind is equally implanted in all; and it is established that the faculty of thinking and reconsidering is present in all—the other things by which the likeness to the divine nature is declared being included in this, that he is recognized as made to the image of God. For whether it be he who was formed in the first constitution of the world, or he who shall be in the future after the consummation of the whole world, each is alike proved to bear in himself the divine image.
因為這形像並不在本性的某一部分,這恩典也不局限於某一個按其自身單一性而被察見的個體;乃是這如此德能的力量實際地遍及全族。而其表徵就是:心智均等地植入眾人之中;並且確立的是,思想與反思的能力存於眾人裡面——其餘那些藉以宣明與神聖本性相似之物,皆包含在這一點裡:他被認出是照神的形像而造的。因為無論是那在世界最初創造中被造之人,或是那將在全世界終結之後出現之人,各人都同樣被證明在自身承載著神聖的形像。
9:137
Idcirco unus homo universitas appellata est, quia divine potentiæ nec præteritum aliquid nec futurum, sed et quod exspectatur, veluti si præsto sit, virtute qua continct intuetur. Omnis itaque natura a primis usque ad novissimos trans­ currens, una quaedam est imago substantiæ : diffe­ rentia vero in masculo et femina deinceps ob hanc, ut arbitror, causam io conformatione peracta est. CAPUT XVIII. Quid oporteat respondere eis qui ambigentes inquirunt an peccatum procreatio filirum sit. Melius autem priusquam propositio ventiletur, opinor absolutionem quæstionis quae ab æmulis nostris profertur inqnirere.
On this account one man is called the universe, because to the divine power nothing is past nor future, but even that which is awaited it beholds, as though it were present, by the power whereby it contains all. The whole nature, therefore, running through from the first to the last, is one certain image of the substance; but the difference in male and female was afterwards wrought in the formation, on account of this cause, as I judge. CHAPTER XVIII. What ought to be answered to those who, doubting, inquire whether the procreation of children be sin. But it is better, I think, before the proposition be ventilated, to inquire into the resolution of the question which is brought forward by our rivals.
為此,一個「人」被稱為宇宙萬有,因為對神聖的大能而言,沒有過去、也沒有將來,乃連那所期待之事,也彷彿如同現在,被那以之含括萬有的能力所察見。因此,那從最初貫穿至末後的整個本性,乃是本質的某一形像;但男女之別,乃如我所判定,是後來因此緣由而在形成中成就的。第十八章。論對那些心存疑惑、追問生養兒女是否為罪的人,應當如何回答。但我想,在這命題被詳加討論之前,最好先查究我們的論敵所提出之問題的解答。
9:138
Dicunt enim ante pecca­ tum nec partum fuisse, nec gemitum, nec appetitum qui propagationi prolis obsequitur : pulsis autem de paradiso post delictum, et muliere parturitionis damnata supplicio, tunc Adam convenisse ut suam conjugem jure cognosceret, et sic effectum esse pro­ creationis exordium.
For they say that before sin there was neither birth, nor groaning, nor the appetite that attends the propagation of offspring; but that, after they had been driven from paradise following the transgression, and the woman had been condemned to the punishment of childbearing, then Adam came together with her so as to know his wife by right, and thus the beginning of procreation was effected.
因為他們說,在犯罪之前,既無生育,也無哀號,也無那伴隨後裔繁衍的情慾;乃是在他們因過犯被逐出樂園、婦人被定了生產之苦的刑罰之後,亞當才與她同房,按理認識自己的妻子,於是繁衍的開端便如此發生了。
9:139
Si ergo nuptiæ in paradiso non erant, neque gemitus ibidem, neque partus, necesse esse aiunt ex consequentibus æstimare, quod ne­ quaquam multiplicarentur homines, nisi ad mortalita­ tem hanc immortalitas recidisset, et naturam nuptiis sua conventione servarent, pro defunctis eos qui nascuntur ex eis continua successione restituens, ila ut videatur peccatum modo quodam hominum utili­ ter introductum. Mansisset autem in illis duobus genus humanum primitus formatis, cum ad successio­ nem nullo mortis metu natura moveretur. Sed in his ite­ rum vera quidem ratio, quaecunque illa est, solis est nota qui juxta Paulum felicis paradisi verbis ineffabilibus probantur instructi ;
If, then, there were no nuptials in paradise, nor groaning there, nor birth, they say it is necessary to reckon from the consequences that men would by no means be multiplied, unless immortality had fallen back into this mortality, and they would preserve nature by their wedded union, restoring by a continual succession those who are born of them in place of the dead—so that sin would seem in a certain useful manner to have been introduced for men. But the human race would have remained in those two who were first formed, since nature would be moved to succession by no fear of death. But in these matters, again, the true reasoning, whatever it is, is known only to those who, according to Paul, are proved to have been instructed by the ineffable words of the happy paradise;
那麼,倘若樂園中既無婚配,那裡也無哀號、無生育,他們就說,必須從後果推斷:人絕不會繁多,除非那不朽墜落為這必死的狀態,而他們藉婚姻的結合保全本性,以連續不斷的承續、用所生之人替補已死之人——以致罪彷彿是以某種有益的方式為人引入的。但人類本會存留在那最初被造的二人之中,因為本性受死亡的懼怕全不催逼便不會走向承續。但在這些事上,那真正的道理,無論它是什麼,唯獨那些照保羅所說、被證明已受了那有福樂園不可言喻之言所教導的人才知曉;
9:140
nostra vero talis esse monstratur assertio. Resistentibus quondam Sadducæis veritati re­ surrectionis, et illam multinubam mulierem quæ septem fratres habuit, in sui pravi dogmatis confirmationem proferentibus, ac deinceps cujus eorum post resurre­ ationem foret uxor sciscitantibus, Dominus respondit non solum Sadducæos informans, sed omnibus futuræ post resurrectionem vitæ sacramenta patefacicns : In resurrectione, inquit, neque nubent, neque ducent uxores ; neque enim ultra mori poterunt, æcquales enim angelis sunt, et sunt filii Dei, cum sint filii Dei re­ surrectionis. Gratia vero resurrectionis nihil nobis aliud pollicetur quam ut antiquum in statum ex nostris lapsibus innovemur.
But our affirmation is shown to be of this kind. When the Sadducees once resisted the truth of the resurrection, and put forward, to confirm their perverse doctrine, that woman of many marriages who had had seven brothers, and thereupon inquired whose wife of them she would be after the resurrection, the Lord answered, instructing not the Sadducees alone but laying open to all the mysteries of the life to come after the resurrection: 'In the resurrection,' He says, 'they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; for neither can they die any more, for they are equal to the angels, and are the sons of God, since they are the sons of the resurrection.' Now the grace of the resurrection promises us nothing else than that we should be restored to our ancient state out of our fallings.
但我們的論斷顯明是如此。撒都該人曾抵擋復活的真理,並為堅固他們乖謬的教義,舉出那曾有七個兄弟為夫、屢次出嫁的婦人,隨後追問復活之後她要作他們中哪一人的妻子;主就回答,不僅教導撒都該人,更向眾人揭示復活之後將來生命的奧祕:祂說:「在復活的時候,人也不娶也不嫁;因為他們不能再死,乃和天使一樣,並且作了神的兒子,既是復活的兒子。」復活的恩典向我們所應許的,無非是叫我們從墮落中得以更新,復歸於起初的境地。
9:141
Quidam namque regres­ sus ad pristinam vitam, gratia quam præstolamur, existit, quæ pulsum de paradiso hominem illuc ite­ rum feliciter introducit. Si igitur reparatorum con­ versatio familiaritate ac numero sociabitur angelo­ rum, clarum est quod homo ante nonam quidam angelus habebatur. Idcirco et cum priorem statum vita nostra receperit, angelis indubitanter æquabitur. Sed quamvis, ut dictum est, inter illos nuptiæ nullæ sint, tamen in infinitis millibus excrcitus ange­ lorum sunt, ita Daniele propheta in suis visionibus intimante.
For a certain return to the former life is the grace we await, which again happily leads back thither the man who was driven out of paradise. If therefore the converse of those restored shall be joined to the angels in fellowship and number, it is clear that man before the fall was reckoned as a kind of angel. Therefore also, when our life has recovered its former state, it will without doubt be made equal to the angels. But although, as has been said, there are no marriages among them, nevertheless they exist in countless thousands of hosts of angels, as the prophet Daniel intimates in his visions.
我們所盼望的恩典,乃是某種歸回先前生命之事,這恩典又欣然將被逐出樂園的人重新領回那裡。所以若蒙恢復者的生活要在交往與數目上與天使相聯合,那麼顯然,墮落以前的人原被視為某種天使。因此,當我們的生命重得先前的境地,必無疑地與天使同等。然而雖如所說,他們中間並無婚娶,他們卻仍以無數千萬的天使大軍存在,正如先知但以理在他的異象中所表明的。
9:142
Ergo juxta eumdem modum si peccali nullus excessus ab illa nos angelica dignitate distra­ heret, nec uobis utique ad multiplicationem generis nuptiæ necessariæ probarentur. Sed quicunque ille natune mutus est, quo angeli multiplicantur, perfe­ etissimus quidem, licet conjecturis Immanis excogi­ tari nequeat. Verumtamen qui profecto existat hic modus, et in his qui paulo minus quam angeli bono rati sunt, effectum suæ operationis ostenderit, usque ad prædestinatum numerum genus humanum Creato­ ris voluntate multiplicans.
Therefore, in like manner, if no excess of sin had drawn us away from that angelic dignity, neither would marriages have been proved necessary to us for the multiplication of the race. But whatever that mode of nature is by which the angels are multiplied—a mode most perfect indeed, though it cannot be devised by human conjectures—nevertheless that mode, whatever it truly is, would have shown the effect of its operation also in those who were made but little less than the angels, multiplying the human race by the will of the Creator up to the predestined number.
所以照樣,若罪的任何過犯未曾把我們從那天使的尊榮中拉走,婚娶對於我們繁衍種類也就不會被證明為必需。但天使藉以繁多的那本性之方式,無論是何—實在是至為完全的,雖非人的揣測所能想出—然而那方式,無論其真正為何,也必在那些「比天使微小一點」者身上顯出其運作的功效,照造物主的旨意把人類繁衍到那預定的數目。
9:143
Si vero quispiam nos forte coarctet, inquirens modum ipsum quo potuissem, animæ lieri, si homo nuptiarum opera non quæsisset, interrogemus et nos, qui modus sit institutionis an­ gelicae, quomodo in infinitis millibus et in una sub­ sistere prohentur essentia, a multo nimirum no- mero constituti. Hoc quippc competentius respondc­ mus ci qui proponit, quomodo possit sine nuptiis homo persistere, dicentes, eo modo quo angeli sine nuptiis esse noscuntur. Nam quod similis eis ante transgressionem fuerit homo, rursus ejusdem simili­ tudinem reformatio manifestat.
But if perchance someone press us hard, inquiring into the very mode by which souls could have come to be, had man not sought the work of marriage, let us also ask him what is the mode of the angelic constitution, how they are held to subsist in countless thousands and yet in one essence, being established surely from a very great number. To this we more fittingly reply to him who proposes how man could continue without marriage, saying: in that mode by which the angels are known to be without marriage. For that man before his transgression was like to them, the renewal again manifests by his likeness to them.
但若有人或要緊逼我們,追問那靈魂得以產生的方式本身—倘若人未尋求婚姻之事—讓我們也問他:天使受造的方式是怎樣的,他們既由極大的數目組成,怎能被認為以無數千萬而存在,卻又在同一本質之中。對於那提出「人怎能不藉婚姻而存續」者,我們更合宜地如此回答:正照天使被認為不藉婚姻而存在的那方式。因為人在過犯之前曾與他們相似,這一點,那復原又藉著對他們的相似而顯明出來。
9:144
His igitur hoc modo patefactis, ad propositam quæstionem recurrat ora­ tio, cum ipost conditionem imagiuis, differentiam maris et feminæ Deus suo dignalus sit excogilarc firmamento. Ad hoc enim utilem fateor esse superio­ rem hanc inspectionem quæ a nobis exprompta est. Nam qui cuncta ut essent produxit, totumque homi­ nem sua dispositione ad divinam formavit imaginem, nequaquam parvis ac modicis adjectionibus pertulit animarum numerum in sua plenitudine minus videri perfectum.
These things therefore being laid open in this manner, let our discourse return to the question proposed, namely why, after the condition of the image, God deigned to devise by His own firm decree the difference of male and female. For to this end I confess that this foregoing consideration which we have set forth is useful. For He who produced all things that they might be, and who fashioned the whole man by His own disposition to the divine image, by no means suffered by small and slight additions that the number of souls should seem less perfect in its fulness.
既以此方式將這些事揭明,就讓我們的論述歸回所提出的問題,就是:在按形像造人之後,神為何照祂堅定的旨意定意設計男女之別。對此目的,我承認我們所陳述的上述這番省察是有用的。因為那位使萬有得以存在、並按其安排把全人塑造成神聖形像者,斷不因些微細小的添加,就讓靈魂的數目在其豐盛上顯得不夠完全。
9:145
Sed simul universam plenitudinem hu­ manæ naturæ effectu præscientiæ contulit, quam etiam sublimissimo atque angelorum non dissimili finecondecorans, quia scivit omnipotente providentia quod non recte moveretur humanæ voluntatis arbi­ trium, et propter hoc ab illa angelica conversalione recederet, ne per hoc humanarum multitudo minue­ retur animarum, cadens ab eo modo quo multiplicati sunt angeli, propterea naturæ nostrae congruam et dignam his qui in peccato labcrentur multiplicatio­ nis providentiam format, pro angelica sublimitate, jumentorum atque irrationabilium modum, quo exisse sibi succedunt, inserens humanæ substanti c.
But at once He conferred the entire fulness of human nature by the effect of His foreknowledge, adorning it also with a most sublime and not unlike-to-the-angels end; for because by His almighty providence He knew that the choice of the human will would not be moved rightly, and that on this account it would withdraw from that angelic converse—lest through this the multitude of human souls should be diminished, falling away from that mode by which the angels were multiplied—therefore He framed for the falling into sin a providence of multiplication suitable to our nature and worthy of those who fall into sin, in place of the angelic sublimity grafting into human substance the mode of beasts and of irrational creatures, by which they succeed one another as they pass away.
但祂同時藉先知之預知的功效,賜下人性全部的豐盛,又以至為崇高、與天使無甚分別的歸宿來裝飾它;因為祂以全能的眷顧預知人意志的抉擇必不被正確地推動,並因此要從那天使的交往中退離—免得人類靈魂的數目因此減少,從天使藉以繁多的那方式中跌落—所以祂為那些陷入罪中者,設立一種合乎我們本性、配於墮落於罪者的繁衍眷顧,以代替天使的崇高,將牲畜與無理性受造物那藉以彼此相承遞替的方式,植入人的本質之中。
9:146
Hinc mihi videtur et magnus ille David compatiens humanæ miseriæ talibus verbis ejus deflere naturam, qu od homo cum in honore esset, non intellexit, ho- I norem dicens quod sanctis ange!is consimilis fuerat; propterea comparatus est jumentis insipientibus et similis factus est illis. Vere namque jumento similis factus est, qui hanc animalem generationem in sua natura suscepit, propter conversionis casum qui ei ex conformatione materiae contigit. CAPUT XIX. Quod passiones in nobis irrationabiles ex cognatione ipsius nuturæ probentur habere occasiones. Arbitror enim ex hoc initio, etiam vitia universa veluti e fonte quodam manantia scatere in hominis conversatione miseranda.
Hence it seems to me that the great David also, compassionating human misery, bewails its nature in such words, that man, while he was in honour, understood not—calling 'honour' the fact that he had been like the holy angels; therefore was he compared to the senseless beasts and made like unto them. For truly he was made like a beast, who took up in his nature this animal mode of generation, on account of the fall of conversion which befell him from the conformation of matter. CHAPTER 19. That the irrational passions in us are shown to have their occasions from the kinship of that very nature. For I think that from this beginning, all the vices also, as though flowing forth from a certain fountain, gush out in the pitiable conduct of man.
由此在我看來,那偉大的大衛也憐憫人的悲慘,用這樣的話為人的本性哀哭,說人在尊貴中卻不曉得—他稱「尊貴」乃指人曾與眾聖天使相似;因此他被比作無知的牲畜,成了與牠們一樣。實在,凡在其本性中承受了這動物式的生育者,便成了與牲畜相似的,這是因物質的構成所臨到他那「轉變的墮落」之故。第十九章:論我們裡面那非理性的情慾,被證明乃從本性自身的同源而有其機緣。因為我以為,從這起頭,一切罪惡也彷彿從某泉源流出,在人可憐的生活中湧溢而出。
9:147
Hac autem praesens asserlio argumentatione firmatur, quod passionum quaedam cognatio nobis et irrationabilibus aequalis appareat. Non enim fas est humanæ naturæ (juxta hoc quod ad divinam speciem formata est) initia passibilis af­ fectionis ascribi : sed quia irrationabilium animan­ tium in hunc mundum vita præcessit, et ob prædi­ ctas causas homo quoque ex eadem formatione ali­ quid habuit juxta generandi decorationem, idcirco particeps etiam reliquorum quæ in natura conspi­ cinatur effectus est. Nec enim juxta furorem homo Deo similis est, neque per passibilem voluplatem supereminens illa figuratur natura ;
This present assertion is confirmed by this argument, that a certain kinship of passions appears to be common to us and to the irrational creatures. For it is not lawful to ascribe to human nature (in respect of that whereby it was fashioned to the divine likeness) the beginnings of passible affection; but because the life of irrational living things preceded into this world, and for the aforesaid causes man too had something from the same fashioning, according to the adornment of begetting, therefore he was made a partaker also of the rest of the effects which are beheld in nature. For man is not like to God in respect of rage, nor is that supereminent nature figured by passible pleasure;
這當前的論斷由如下論證得以確立,就是有某種情慾的同源,顯為我們與無理性受造物所共有。因為按人性受造以合乎神聖之相的那方面而言,把易受感觸之情的起頭歸於人性,乃是不合宜的;只因無理性活物的生命先進入這世界,又因前述的緣由,人從同一構造中、照生育的妝飾,也得了某些東西,所以他也成了在本性中所見其餘各樣功效的有分者。因為人並非在暴怒這一面與神相似,那超越的本性也不藉易受感觸的快樂而被描繪;
9:148
metus quoque et audacia , appetentia plurium atque diminutionis odium, horumque similia, ab ca flgura qua Divinilas esprimitur procul existunt. Hæc igitur humana sub­ stantia de rationabili parte contraxit. Ea namque qoibot brulorum vita ad conservationem sui munita est, ad hominis translala conservationem, passionum initia facta sunt. Furore namque conservantur bestiæ, quæ carne vescuntur ; quæcunque vero lasciva sunt, genus suum propagatione multiplicant : fuga custodit invalidum, et metus eum tuetur qui facilius a fortio­ ribus capitur; corpulentum quoque servat edacitas ; et si contigerit non assequi quod voluptas inquirit, fit irrationabilis mœroris occasio.
fear too, and boldness, the appetite for more and the hatred of diminution, and the like of these, stand far off from that figure by which Divinity is expressed. These therefore the human substance contracted from its irrational part. For those things by which the life of brutes is fortified for its own preservation, when transferred to man's preservation, became the beginnings of the passions. For by rage are preserved the beasts that feed on flesh; whatever creatures are lustful multiply their kind by propagation; flight guards the weak, and fear protects him who is more easily caught by the stronger; gluttony too preserves the corpulent; and if it happen that one does not attain what pleasure seeks, it becomes the occasion of irrational grief.
懼怕與膽量、貪求更多與憎惡減損,以及諸如此類的,都遠離那藉以表彰神性的形像。所以這些乃是人的本質從其無理性的部分所沾染而來。因為那些用以鞏固禽獸自保之生命者,一旦被轉用於人的自保,便成了情慾的起頭。因為以肉為食的野獸藉暴怒得保全;凡淫蕩者藉繁殖增多其類;逃遁護守軟弱者,懼怕保護那較易被強者所擒者;貪食又保全肥壯者;而若所求的快樂未能得著,就成了無理性憂傷的機緣。
9:149
Hæc autem omnia, et si qua sunt talia, ex animali brutaque institutione generationi hominum accessisse non dubium est. Sed mihi concedatur ut juxta quamdam fictionem rei mi­ rabilis humanam formam sermone describam. Sicut enim videmus de rebus fictis sculptilia fieri simula­ cra quæ intuentium animos ad stuporem vertunt. hi qui hujus esse probantur artis exculpunt ita ut interdum unum caput biforme constituant, sic hominis duplex ac contraria similitudo quædam vi­ detur existere, mente quidem qua Deo dignus est ad divinam formatus pulchritudinem, passionibus autem quarum pulsatur impetu ad bruta animalia quadam proprietate conjunctus :
All these, and whatever else is of this kind, there is no doubt have come upon the generation of men from the animal and brutish constitution. But let it be granted me to describe in words the human form according to a certain figuration of a wondrous thing. For just as we see images made from fashioned things, statues which turn the minds of beholders to astonishment—those who are proved to be of this art carve in such a way that sometimes they make a single two-formed head—so a certain twofold and contrary likeness of man seems to exist: by the mind indeed, whereby he is worthy of God, formed to the divine beauty; but by the passions, by whose onset he is buffeted, joined by a certain property to the brute animals;
凡這一切,以及凡屬此類的,無疑都是從動物與禽獸的構造臨到人類的生育之中。但容我用言語照某種奇妙之物的塑形來描繪人的形貌。正如我們看見從受造之物造出的雕像,那使觀者心生驚異的塑像—凡精於此藝者,雕刻之法有時竟造出一個雙形的頭—照樣,人似乎也存在著某種雙重而相反的相似:就心智而言,他藉此配得屬於神,被塑成神聖之美;但就那些以衝擊擊打他的情慾而言,他卻藉某種特性與野獸相連;
9:150
frequenter autem motus pene brutus efficitur, quoties ad motus irra­ tionabiles penitus inclinatur, obscurans id quod est in se melius, deterioris affectu. Mox enim ut quis ad passionis tabem efficaciam mentis inflexerit, eique sua consilia servire compulerit, tunc quædam depra­ vatio bonæ formationis ostenditur, et ita natura om­ nis hi malitiam commutatur, cum jam ratio penitus excolat principia passionum, et in augmentum ne­ quitiæ vitiorum causas ipsas cogitationes multiplicet. Cooperationem namque suam mens passionibus ex­ hibens, mntifidam densamque malorum copiam pro­ creavit. Sic libido voluptatis exordium quidem de similitudine naturae irrationabilis habuit, sed in.
and frequently the motion becomes almost brutish, whenever he is utterly inclined to irrational motions, obscuring that which is better in himself by the affection of the worse. For as soon as one bends the efficacy of the mind to the corruption of passion, and compels his counsels to serve it, then a certain depravation of the good formation is displayed, and so all nature is changed into wickedness, when now reason wholly cultivates the principles of the passions, and for the increase of iniquity multiplies the very thoughts as causes of the vices. For the mind, exhibiting its co-operation to the passions, has procreated a manifold and dense abundance of evils. Thus the lust of pleasure had indeed its beginning from the likeness of irrational nature, but in
這活動往往幾近於禽獸,每當人全然傾向於非理性的衝動,便以對較劣者的偏愛遮蔽自己裡面那較善的。因為人一旦把心智的效力轉向情慾的腐敗,並強迫自己的籌算服事它,那時善之構成便顯出某種敗壞,於是整個本性都變為惡,因如今理性竟全力培植情慾的根基,並為增添邪惡,把意念本身繁增為諸惡的緣由。因為心智向情慾獻上它的協作,便產生了眾多而密集的諸惡之豐盈。如此,快樂之慾固然從無理性之本性的相似得了起頭,但在
9:151
ex­ cessibus hominum vehementer accrevit, tantas dit' ferentias procreatorum quæ veniunt ex ipsa voluntate progenerans, quantas in irrationabilibus invenire non possis. Sic commotio furoris irrationabilis quidem rei cognata est, crescit vero cogitationis accessu. Hinc enim memoria malitiae, hinc invidiæ hinc men- dacium, insidiæ quoque ac simulationes binc esse monstrantur. Hæc autem omnia ex iniquæ mentis cultura proveniunt. Nam si passionis impetus nullo cogitationis extollatur adminiculo, cito lassescit, fu­ rorque vehemens invalidus approbatur, moxque ut fuerit exortus exstinguitur.
the excesses of men it grew vehemently, begetting such great differences of the things produced—differences which come from the will itself—as you could not find among the irrational creatures. Thus the commotion of rage is indeed kindred to an irrational thing, but it grows by the accession of thought. For hence is the memory of malice, hence envy, hence falsehood, treacheries too and dissemblings are shown to come from here. But all these proceed from the cultivation of an iniquitous mind. For if the onset of passion be exalted by no support of thought, it quickly grows weary, and vehement rage is proved feeble, and as soon as it has arisen is extinguished.
在人的過度之中,它劇烈地增長,產出極大的、出於意志本身的、所產之物的種種差異—這些差異是你在無理性受造物中尋不到的。如此,暴怒的騷動固然與無理性之物同源,卻藉思想的增添而滋長。因為由此而有惡毒的記憶,由此而有嫉妒,由此而有謊言,奸詐與偽裝也顯為從此而出。但這一切都出於不義之心的培植。因為若情慾的衝擊不被任何思想的支持所高舉,它便速速疲乏,劇烈的暴怒被證為無力,一興起便即熄滅。
9:152
Sic avida porcorum ea - ciias occasiones avaritiæ praestitit, sic assultatio equi exordium superbiæ facta est , et omnia quæ sunt irrationabilium probamenta causarum, per malæ mentis usum rationabilium initia sunt effecta morta­ lium. Sicut econtrario cum hos impetus cogitatio re­ frenat et cohibet, in speciem virtutis protinus trans­ feruntur. Nam ex furore quidem fortitudo descendit, ex pavore cautela; mclus autem subjectionem gene­ rat, et odium aversionem malignitatis instigat ; dile­ ctionis etiam virlus desiderium veri boni conciliat ; exaltatio quoque mores a passionibus eruit, et libe­ ram prudentiam a turpitudinis servitute conservat.
Thus the greedy voracity of swine furnished the occasions of avarice; thus the prancing of the horse became the beginning of pride; and all the things which are the proofs of irrational causes, through the mind's evil use, were made the beginnings of rational mortals' vices. So, on the contrary, when thought reins in and restrains these onsets, they are forthwith transferred into the appearance of virtue. For from rage indeed descends fortitude, from dread caution; fear begets submission, and hatred stirs up the turning-away from malignity; the virtue of love too procures the desire of the true good; exaltation likewise plucks our characters out from the passions, and preserves free prudence from the slavery of baseness.
如此,豬之貪婪的暴食提供了貪財的機緣;如此,馬之昂揚成了驕傲的起頭;凡屬無理性緣由之憑據者,藉心智的惡用,都成了有理性之必死人類眾惡的起頭。反之,當思想勒住並約束這些衝擊時,它們立時被轉化為德行的樣式。因為從暴怒而下降勇毅,從畏懼而生謹慎;懼怕生出順服,憎惡激動對惡毒的厭離;愛的德行又招致對真善的渴慕;高舉也把我們的品性從情慾中拔出,並保守那自由的明智脫離卑賤的奴役。
9:153
Collaudat autem hujus subtilitatis speciem et beatus Apostolus, cum sæpenumero nobis imperat ut ca quae sursum sont sapiamus. Et ita reperies quod om­ nis motus talis qui mentem in alta sustollat, al pul­ chritudinem divinae conformetur imaginis. Sed quia gravis quaedam est et deorsum vergens qualitas de­ lictorum meliorique parte valet, magis autempon­ dere na uræ irratioriabilis animæ principale depri­ mitur, quoniam grave hoc atque terrenum sublimitate mentis elevatur, idcirco plerumque contingit ut mu­ nera divina ignoret nostra miseria, pulcherrimæ imagini fœdissimam faciem passionis obducens.
The blessed Apostle too commends the appearance of this subtlety, when he repeatedly commands us to be wise about the things that are above. And so you will find that every such motion, which lifts the mind on high, is conformed to the beauty of the divine image. But because there is a certain heavy and downward-tending quality of sins which prevails over the better part, and the ruling power of the soul is depressed rather by the weight of irrational nature, since this heavy and earthly thing is elevated by the sublimity of the mind, therefore it often comes to pass that our misery is ignorant of the divine gifts, drawing over the most beautiful image the most foul face of passion.
那有福的使徒也稱許這精微之相,因他屢次吩咐我們要思念上面的事。如此你必發覺,凡這樣把心智向上提升的活動,都被塑造合乎神聖形像之美。但因諸罪有某種沉重、向下傾墜的質性,勝過那較善的部分,靈魂的主宰之能反被無理性之本性的重量所壓抑—因為這沉重屬地之物本當藉心智的崇高被高舉—所以往往成這樣的事:我們的悲慘竟不識神聖的恩賜,把情慾至為污穢的面孔蒙在那至美的形像之上。
9:154
Ideo­ que digni sunt qui ista cernentes, non facile divinam formam talibus inesse consentiunt, sed per eos qui rectæ vitæ conversatione resplendent, divinam in hominibus imaginem contueri. Nam si vitiosus quis­ que vel carni deditus non sinit de homine credi quod sit divina pulchritudine decoratus, sed ille qui in virtute perfectus est, et ab omni contagione pu­ vissimus, eam firmet opinionem, quæ de hominis parte meliore subsistat, ut (melius enim probatur exemplo quod dicitur) aliquem decorem naturæ con­ tactu malignitatis imminuit, illc vel maxime qui in peccatis probatur esse notissimus, ut fuit Jechonias, vel quispiam alius qui in nequitia clarus esse me­ moratur.
And therefore those who behold these things are right in not easily consenting that the divine form is present in such persons, but rather to discern the divine image in men through those who shine forth by the conduct of an upright life. For if every vicious person or one given to the flesh does not allow it to be believed of man that he is adorned with divine beauty, yet he who is perfect in virtue and most pure from every contagion confirms that opinion which subsists concerning the better part of man—so that (for what is said is better proved by example) just as the touch of malignity diminishes some comeliness of nature, he above all does so who is proved to be most notorious in sins, as was Jechoniah, or any other who is recorded to be conspicuous in wickedness.
因此,凡看見這些事的人,不輕易承認神聖之相存於這等人身上,乃是對的;倒要藉那些以正直生活之行為而發光者,在人身上辨認出神聖的形像。因為若每一惡人或縱於肉體者不容人相信人是以神聖之美所裝飾的,那在德行上完全、且從一切沾染中至為純潔者,卻堅固那存於人較善部分的看法—以致(所說的藉例子更得證明)正如惡毒的觸碰削減本性某種美好,那在罪中被證為最聲名狼藉者尤其如此,如同耶哥尼雅,或別的被記載為以邪惡著稱者。
9:155
Sed in Mose ejusque similibus imaginis pulchritudo perfecta conspicitur. In quibus itaque decor nulla obscuritate fœdatur, in his evidens eorum qua; dicuntur fides clucet, eo quod homo divinae bo­ nitalis imitator existat. Sed forsitan aliquis erubescit quod sumentes cibum irrationabilis vitae nos simili­ ludo constringat, et idcirco indignum putat hominem, qui ad imaginem Dei factus est : sed hujus quoque functionis speretur immunitas naturæ nostræ in illa vita quæ futura est, quandoque tribuenda. Non est enim, sicut ait Apostolus :
But in Moses and those like him the beauty of the image is beheld perfect. In whomsoever therefore the comeliness is defiled by no obscurity, in these the faith of the things that are said shines forth evidently, in that man exists as an imitator of the divine goodness. But perhaps someone blushes that, taking the food of irrational life, a likeness binds us together, and therefore deems it unworthy of man who was made to the image of God; but let immunity from this function also be hoped for our nature in that life which is to come, to be granted at some time. For it is not, as the Apostle says:
但在摩西及與他相像者身上,形像之美得以見其完全。所以凡其美好不被任何晦暗所污者,在這等人身上,所說之事的信實便顯然發光,因人成了神聖良善的效法者。但或許有人因取食無理性生命之物、致使一種相似把我們連在一起而面紅,並因此認為這對按神形像所造的人是不配的;然而願我們的本性在將來的那生命中,也盼望得免於此功能,於某時得蒙賜予。因為正如使徒所說,這並非如此:
9:156
Regnum Deiesca et po­ tus, nec in solo pane hominemvivere testatus est Do­ minus, sed in omni verbo quod procedit de ore Dei, necron et resurrectionis gloriam, cum vitam nostram coæquandamangelis approhet. Apud angelos autem cibus non est. Idonea prorsus fides est hanc homini # functionem fore liberam, qui ad similitudinem factus est angelorum. CAPUT XX Mystica interpretatio ejus quod de omni ligno quod in paradiso erat homo edere permittebatur. Sed forte non in eamdem iterum vitae speciem rc­ gredi quis hominem dixerit, cum primitus edendo viveremus. Verum ego sanctam Scripturam audiens, non cihurn corporcum novi, nec solum quae ex carne est lætitiam.
The kingdom of God is not food and drink; and the Lord testified that man lives not by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God; and also testified to the glory of the resurrection, when He approves that our life is to be made equal to the angels. But among the angels there is no food. Wholly fitting therefore is the faith that this function will be free for man, who was made to the likeness of the angels. CHAPTER 20. A mystical interpretation of that which is said: of every tree that was in paradise man was permitted to eat. But perhaps someone may say that man does not return again into the same kind of life, since at first we lived by eating. Yet I, hearing Holy Scripture, know not bodily food, nor only the gladness which is from the flesh.
神的國不在乎吃喝;主又見證人活著不是單靠食物,乃是靠神口裡所出的一切話;並見證復活的榮耀,因祂認定我們的生命要與天使同等。然而天使中間並無食物。所以這信實全然合宜,就是這功能對於那按天使的樣式所造的人必得自由。第二十章:論「神准人吃樂園中各樣樹上的果子」一語的奧義解釋。但或許有人說,人並不再歸回同一種生命,因起初我們是靠吃而活。然而我聽從聖經,所認識的並非身體的食物,也非單從肉體而來的歡樂。
9:157
Sed ct aliam escam prorsus agnosco, quæ similitudinem quamdam proportionis escæ hujus corporis gerat, cujus eliam voluptas atque suavitas ad animum solummodo transeat. Unde et Sapientia csuricntes cohortatur et dicit: Ediie de meis panibus : etbeatos asserit Dominus cos qui hujuscemodi cibos esuriunt. Et si quis, ait, silit, veniat ad me, et bibat. Magnus quoque Isaias : Bibite, inquit, lætitiam, præ­ cipiens his qui ejus audire magnificentiampossent. Est autem quædam ctiam prophetica comminatio in ros qui tali ultione digni sunt, ut tanquam fame puniantur. Fames autem non indigentia panis aut aquæsed verbi defectus Cit. Non fames,inquit, panis, neque sitis aquæ, sed audiendi verbum Dei ;
But I altogether acknowledge yet another food, which bears a certain likeness of proportion to this food of the body, whose pleasure too and sweetness passes only to the soul. Whence also Wisdom exhorts the hungry and says: 'Eat of my bread'; and the Lord declares blessed those who hunger for such foods. And 'if anyone thirst,' He says, 'let him come to me and drink.' The great Isaiah too says: 'Drink gladness,' commanding those who could hear his magnificence. And there is also a certain prophetic threat against those who are worthy of such vengeance, that they should be punished as it were by famine. But the famine is not a lack of bread or water, but a failing of the word. 'Not a famine,' he says, 'of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the word of God';
但我完全承認還有另一種食物,與身體的這食物帶有某種相稱的相似,其快樂與甘甜只達於心靈。因此智慧也勸勉飢餓者說:「你們要吃我的餅」;主又宣告那飢渴慕此類食物者為有福。祂說:「人若渴了,可以到我這裡來喝。」大先知以賽亞也說:「你們要暢飲喜樂」,吩咐那些能聽他威嚴之言者。對於那些配受此報應者,也有某種先知的威嚇,就是他們要彷彿因饑荒受刑罰。但那饑荒並非缺乏餅或水,乃是話語的缺乏。他說:「不是缺餅的饑荒,也不是缺水的乾渴,乃是聽不見神話語的饑荒」;
9:158
planta­ tionis ergo illius quae in Edoni a Deo facta est. Vo­ luptas autem (quam interpretatur Edom ) dignum quemdam fructum nos excogitare compellit, ex quo indubitanter alebatur humana substantia, nec hanc profecto voluptatem quæ transit ac defluit in paradisi conversatione sentire convenit. Ab omni ligno, in­ quit, quod est in paradiso comedes. Quis dabit ei quod salubriter esurit lignum illud quod est in paradiso, quod omne bonum prorsus amplectitur, cui nomen est omne cujus participationem lex homini tribuit? Generali namque et supereminenti verbo omnis hæc bonorum species sibi cognita est, totumque boc unum est;
of that planting therefore which was made by God in Eden. But pleasure (which is what Edom is interpreted to mean) compels us to devise a certain worthy fruit, by which without doubt the human substance was nourished; nor indeed is it fitting to perceive in the converse of paradise this pleasure which passes away and flows off. 'Of every tree,' He says, 'that is in paradise thou shalt eat.' Who will give him, who wholesomely hungers, that tree which is in paradise, which embraces utterly every good, whose name is 'every,' the participation of which the law granted to man? For by a general and supereminent word this whole species of goods is known to itself, and this whole is one thing;
所以這乃是論到那神在伊甸所栽種的。但快樂(伊甸所譯之意)迫使我們想出某種配得的果子,藉此人的本質無疑得了滋養;卻實在不宜在樂園的交往中,去領受這轉瞬即逝、流失而去的快樂。祂說:「樂園中各樣樹上的果子,你可以吃。」誰能把那「在樂園中、全然包羅一切善、名為『各樣』、其分享為律法所賜予人」的那樹,賜給那有益地飢餓的人呢?因為藉一個總括而超越的字,這全部諸善之類為其自身所知,這全部乃是一;
9:159
quis autem me ab illius ligni guslu per­ mixti, si atque in utramque partem vergentis amo- veatur ? Non enim prorsus habetur incertum apud eos quos gratia contemplationis illustrat, quid sit omne lignum cujus fructus vita est, et iterum quid sit hoc promiscuurn atque confusum cujus contactu mors gignitur. Qui enim omnem jucunditatem copiosa largitate concessit, profeclo quadam ratione atque providentia hominem a communium perceptione prohibuit. Ac mihi videtur oportere non magnificen­ tissimum David et sapientissimum Salomonem legis hujus desertores assumere. Utrique enim hujus cilii vivam gratiam professi sunt. Id enim, quod vere est, bonum, omne utique bonum est. David quidem dicit:
but who shall remove me from the taste of that tree which is mixed and inclining to either side? For it is by no means held uncertain among those whom the grace of contemplation illumines, what is the 'every tree' whose fruit is life, and again what is this promiscuous and confused thing by whose touch death is begotten. For He who granted with copious bounty every delight, by a certain reason and providence assuredly forbade man from the partaking of common things. And it seems to me right not to take the most magnificent David and the most wise Solomon as deserters of this law. For both of them professed the living grace of this food. For that which truly is, the good, is wholly every good. David indeed says:
但誰能使我脫離那混雜、向兩面傾倚之樹的滋味呢?因為凡蒙默觀之恩光照者,斷不會以「果子即生命的『各樣樹』為何」為不確定,又不會以「其觸碰生出死亡的這雜混混亂之物為何」為不確定。因為那以豐盛的慷慨賜下一切歡愉者,必憑某種道理與眷顧,禁止人去領受那些尋常之物。在我看來,不該把至為威嚴的大衛與至為智慧的所羅門當作這律法的背棄者。因為二人都承認這食物之活潑的恩典。因為那真實存在的善,全然乃是各樣的善。大衛固然說:
9:160
Delectare seu deliciare in Domino. Salomon autem sapientiam ipsam, quæ est Dominus, lignum vitæ cognominat. Ergo idipsum est lignum vitæquod est lignum omne cujus cibum omnem ei qui secun­ dum Deum creatus est lex divina concessit. Econ­ trario vero ab hoc ligno lignum secernitur atiud, cujus esca scientiæ boni et mali esi, non utrumque scorsum juxta significantiam contrarietatis in parte fructificans, sed quemdam confusum fructum per­ mixtumque proferens adversa qualitate sibi concre­ tum, a cujus perceptione auctor quidem vitæ nos prohibet. Persuadet autem serpens ut edatur, ut per hoc mortis machinetur ingressum ;
'Delight or take pleasure in the Lord.' And Solomon names wisdom itself, which is the Lord, the tree of life. Therefore the tree of life is the very same as that 'every tree,' all whose food the divine law granted to him who was created according to God. But on the contrary, from this tree another tree is separated off, whose food is the knowledge of good and evil, fructifying not each apart according to the signification of contrariety, but bringing forth a certain confused fruit, mixed and grown together with itself by a contrary quality; from the partaking of which the Author of life indeed forbids us. But the serpent persuades that it be eaten, that thereby he may contrive the entrance of death;
「你要以耶和華為樂」(或作以耶和華為喜悅)。所羅門又稱智慧本身—就是主—為生命樹。所以生命樹正與那「各樣樹」相同,神聖的律法把其一切的食物都賜給那按神所造的人。然而反之,從這樹中分別出另一樹,其食物乃善惡的知識,並非照相反的含義各自分開結果,乃是結出某種混亂的果子,與自身藉相反的質性混雜共生;生命之主就禁止我們去領受它。但那蛇卻勸誘人去吃,要藉此謀劃死亡的入口;
9:161
cum suasione ipsa prævaluit, lethale consilium tribuens, et colore quo­ dam fallaci eumdem fructum voluptatum respergens, ita ut suavissimus appareret et appetitum gustatus accenderet. CAPUT XXI. Quæ fuerit iN paradiso vita, et quale sit illud lignum quod interdictum est. Quid igitur illud est quod boni malique scientiam continet, atque per voluptatem sensuum videtur esse gratissimum? putasne conjecturis studio non procul a veritate descisco, scientiæ abutens intelligentia., per hujus contemplationis obtentum.
and by the very persuasion he prevailed, imparting deadly counsel and sprinkling that same fruit with a certain deceptive colour of pleasures, so that it appeared most sweet and kindled the appetite of taste. CHAPTER 21. What the life in paradise was, and what manner of thing is that tree which was forbidden. What therefore is that which contains the knowledge of good and evil, and through the pleasure of the senses seems to be most pleasing? Do you think that by conjectures pursued with zeal I depart not far from the truth, employing the understanding of knowledge, by the support of this contemplation?
並藉那勸誘本身得了優勢,賜下致命的籌算,又以某種欺哄的色彩塗染那同一果子的快樂,使它顯為至甜,並挑動口味的食慾。第二十一章:論樂園中的生命是怎樣的,那被禁的樹又是何樣之物。那麼,那含有善惡知識、又藉感官的快樂顯為至悅人者,究竟是甚麼?你以為我憑著熱切追究的揣測,藉這默觀的憑藉、運用對知識的理解,不致遠離真理麼?
9:162
Opinor enim non disciplinam in præsenti hanc scientiam posse sentiri eorum qui exercitatos habent sensus, quam­ dam vero differentiam Scripturarum consuetudinem divinarum scientiæ atque discretionis invenio. Nam juxta disciplinam bonum a malo discernere, perfe­ ctioris esse habitus dicit Apostolus, eorum qui exer­ citatos habent sensus. Idcirco etiam ut omnia pro­ bemus edocuit, et spiritualis viri proprium esse dixit quod possit omnia judicare atque discernere. Scientia vero non ubique disciplinam atque notitiam secun­ dum significanliam suam semper insinuat, sed in bonam partem juxta effecium gratiæ dicitur, ut est illud : Novit Dominus qui sunt ejus. Et ad Mosen ait Deus :
For I think that this knowledge in the present cannot be understood as the discipline of those who have their senses exercised, but I find a certain difference: the custom of the divine Scriptures with regard to knowledge and discretion. For according to discipline, to discern good from evil the Apostle says belongs to the more perfect habit, of those who have their senses exercised. Therefore also he taught us to prove all things, and said it is the property of the spiritual man that he can judge and discern all things. But knowledge does not everywhere insinuate discipline and acquaintance according to its signification always, but it is spoken in a good sense according to the effect of grace, as is that: 'The Lord knoweth those who are His.' And God says to Moses:
因為我以為,這在當前的知識不能被理解為那些感官練達者的訓練;我倒發覺有某種分別:就是神聖經卷論到知識與分辨的慣用法。因為按訓練而言,使徒說分辨善惡乃屬那感官練達者較完全的習慣。所以他也教導我們要凡事察驗,並說屬靈之人的特性,就是能判斷並分辨萬事。然而「知識」並非處處、總是照其字義含示訓練與認識,乃是照恩典的功效,在美善的意義上被說及,如那句:「主認識誰是祂的人。」神又對摩西說:
9:163
Novi te præ omnibus, et his quæ culpantur in malis, qui novit omnia testatur et dicit : Nunquam novi vos; ergo lignum illud quod scientiam permix­ tam confusamque fructificat ex his est quæ nobis interdicuntur a Domino. Contrariis namque qualita­ tibus fructus ille videtur esse conjunctus, qui etiam assertorem probatur habere serpentem : secundum hanc fortasse rationem quod malum non proponitur nudum atque intectum, ut ipsum per sese juxta na­ turam suam conspici queat; alioquin inefficax malitia ipsa mansisset nullo boni colorata figmento, per quod is qui decipitur in ejus attrahi desiderium possit.
'I know thee above all'; and concerning those who are blamed in their evils, He who knows all things testifies and says: 'I never knew you.' Therefore that tree which fructifies mixed and confused knowledge is of those things which are forbidden us by the Lord. For that fruit appears to be joined to contrary qualities, which also is proved to have the serpent as its proponent: according perhaps to this reason, that evil is not set forth naked and uncovered, so that it could be beheld through itself according to its own nature; otherwise malice itself would have remained ineffective, coloured by no semblance of good, through which he who is deceived can be drawn into desire of it.
「我認識你勝過認識眾人」;至於那些在惡中受責備的,那知道萬事者見證說:「我從來不認識你們。」所以那結出混雜混亂之知識的樹,乃屬那些為主所禁止我們者。因為那果子顯為與相反的質性相連,又被證明以蛇為其倡導者:或許照如下道理,就是惡並非赤裸、無遮地擺出,使它能照其自身本性被看見;否則惡毒本身既無善的外貌所塗染,便要保持無效,那受欺者也無從藉此被引入對它的渴慕。
9:164
Nunc autem permixta quodammodo mali natura est, in alto quidern perniciem continens, veluti quasdam locans apertas insidias. In ea vero seductione quæ non patet, boni quamdam imaginem præ se fert, bo­ num namque videtur avaris et cupidis materiæ, iJ est, auri color, sed radix omnium malorum est ava- rito. Quis autem in cœnum teterrimæ ac fœdissimæ libidinis rueret, nisi voluptatem bonum quiddam acceptumque reputaret, ad passionis morbum qua­ dam pellectus illecebra ? Sic et cætera peccatorum permixtam prorsus habent differentiam. quæ acce­ ptissirna primo putantur aspectu, et seductionis fuco pro bonis ab inconsideratis et imprudentibus appe­ tuntur.
But now the nature of evil is in some way mixed, containing destruction in its depth, as it were placing certain open snares. But in that seduction which is not apparent, it presents before itself a certain image of good; for the colour of gold, that is, of matter, seems good to the avaricious and covetous, but the root of all evils is avarice. And who would rush into the mire of most foul and most filthy lust, unless he reckoned pleasure to be something good and acceptable, allured by a certain enticement to the disease of passion? So too the rest of sins have an utterly mixed difference, which at first sight are thought most acceptable, and by the deceit of seduction are sought as goods by the inconsiderate and imprudent.
但如今惡的本性在某種意義上是混雜的,在其深處含著敗壞,彷彿安置了某些張開的陷阱。但在那不顯露的引誘中,它在自身面前呈現出某種善的形像;因為金子—即物質—的色澤,在貪婪貪心者看來似為善,然而萬惡之根乃是貪財。誰會投身於至污至穢之情慾的泥淖,除非他把快樂算作某種善而可悅的,被某種引誘吸往情慾的疾病呢?其餘的諸罪也照樣全然具有混雜的差異,初看被認為至可悅納,又藉引誘的塗飾,被無思慮、無智慧者當作善而追求。
9:165
Quia ergo plerique id esse bonum quod sen­ IUS lætificat arbitrantur, et quædam est cognatio nominis, seu veraciter existentis boni, seu quod bo­ num putatur, et non est, hac de causa concupiscen­ tiam illam quæ ad malum velut ad bonum pertrahit, mali et boni scientiam Scriptura sancta commemo­ rat : dum scientia isla quemdam declaret affectum, nec absolute malum, quia boni superficie coloratum est, ncc sincerissime bonum, quia mali in eo delite­ scit exitium, sed promiscuum, id est, ex utroque perplexum, interdicti ligni fructum esse testatur, cujus gustum dixit ad mortem tangentes attrahere.
Because therefore most people think that to be good which gladdens the sense, and there is a certain kinship of name—whether of the good which truly exists, or of that which is thought good and is not—for this cause Holy Scripture calls that concupiscence which draws to evil as though to good the 'knowledge of evil and of good': while this knowledge declares a certain affection, neither absolutely evil, because it is coloured with the surface of good, nor most sincerely good, because the destruction of evil lurks in it, but promiscuous, that is, perplexed from both, it testifies to be the fruit of the forbidden tree, whose taste it said draws those who touch it to death.
所以因為多數人以為悅樂感官者即是善,又因名稱有某種同源—無論是真實存在的善,或是被認為善卻並非善的—因此聖經把那「引人趨惡如趨善」的私慾,稱為「善惡的知識」:這知識既顯出某種情感,既非絕對的惡,因它被善的外表所塗染,又非至為純真的善,因惡的滅亡潛藏其中,乃是雜混的,就是從二者交纏而來,聖經見證它為那被禁之樹的果子,並說其滋味把那觸碰者引向死亡。
9:166
Pene hoc evidenti et dogmate et voce proclamans, quia quod vere est bonum, simplex et unicum est, a natura omnium alienum; malum vero varium at­ que fucatum est, quod aliud quidem putetur esse, aliud vero ipsa experientia comprobetur, cujus scientia, id est operationis effectus causa est mortis et corruptionis exordium. Ideoque praemonstrans serpens fructum peccati nequissimum, non sicut sese habet naturæ malum evidenter ostendit (nequaquam quippe homo seduceretur aperta malitia), sed quadam specie quod apparebat illustrans, voluptatemque per sensus insinuans atque inferens gustui, transgressio­ nem mulieri persuasit, sicut Scriptura dicit:
Almost proclaiming this by an evident doctrine and voice, that what is truly good is simple and single, alien from the nature of all things; but evil is various and painted over, which is thought to be one thing, but by very experience is proved to be another, whose knowledge—that is, the effect of operation—is the cause of death and the beginning of corruption. And therefore the serpent, foreshowing the most wicked fruit of sin, did not evidently display evil as it stands in its nature (for man would by no means be seduced by open malice), but illuminating by a certain appearance that which was visible, and insinuating pleasure through the senses and presenting it to taste, persuaded the woman to transgression, as Scripture says:
幾乎藉顯明的教義與聲音宣告這事,就是那真實的善乃是單純獨一的,與萬物的本性有別;而惡卻是駁雜、塗飾的,被以為是一物,按實際的經歷卻被證為另一物,其知識—即運作的功效—乃死亡的緣由、敗壞的起頭。因此那蛇,預先顯出罪那至惡的果子時,並未顯明地把惡照其本性所是的擺出(因人斷不致被赤露的惡毒所引誘),乃是以某種外貌照亮那可見之物,藉感官引入快樂,並把它呈於口味,便勸誘那婦人犯罪,正如經上所說:
9:167
Et vidit mulier quod bonum esset lignum ad vescendum, gratumque oculis ad videndum, et pulchrum ad con­ trectandum ; et sumpsit de fructu ejus atque comedit. Esca autem illa mater torris hominibus facta est. Nec est igitur permixta fructificatio. Manifeste nam­ que sermo patefecit intelligentiam, quemadmodum boni et mali scientia lignum illud appellatum esse videatur. Sicut venenum melle circumlitum, secun­ dum id quod sensus mulcet insparsa dulcedo bonum esse creditur, secundum id autem quod sumentes intercipit atque corrumpit, efficitur omni malo de­ terius.
'And the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and pleasant to the eyes to behold, and fair to handle; and she took of its fruit and ate.' But that food became the mother of death to men. There is not therefore a mixed fructification. For the discourse manifestly laid open the understanding, how that tree was seen to be called the knowledge of good and evil. Just as poison smeared round with honey: according to that whereby the sprinkled-in sweetness soothes the sense, it is believed to be good; but according to that whereby it cuts off and corrupts those who take it, it is made worse than every evil.
「於是婦人見那樹的果子好作食物,悅人眼目,且可喜愛能撫弄;就摘下果子來吃了。」但那食物成了人類死亡之母。所以這並非混雜的結果。因為這論述顯明地揭開了悟性,說明那樹為何被稱為善惡的知識。正如毒藥塗以蜂蜜:按那撒入的甘甜撫慰感官這一面,它被信為善;但按那把領受者剪除、敗壞這一面,它卻成了比一切惡更惡的。
9:168
Ut ergo prævaluerunt adversus hominis vitam venena mortifera, tunc homo, magna res, magnum­ que vocabulum, divinæque figuratio naturae, vanitati, sicut dicit propheta, similis jactus est. Igitur imago Dei in his quae optima in nobis intelliguntur proprie cernitur; quaecunque vero in vita nostra miseranda videntur et tristia, divina prorsus similitudine pro­ bantur aliena. CAPUT XXII. Quod resurrectio non tantum ex Scripturarum prædi­ catione, quantum ex ipsa rerum necessitate debeat sustineri. Sed non est ita robusta malitia, ut prævaleat divi­ potentiæ, neque melior aut perseverantior naturæ nostrae inconstantia quam sapientia Dei.
As therefore the deadly poisons prevailed against the life of man, then man—a great thing, a great name, and the figuration of the divine nature—was cast down, like vanity, as the prophet says. Therefore the image of God is properly discerned in those things which are understood to be best in us; but whatever things seem pitiable and sad in our life are proved to be utterly alien from the divine likeness. CHAPTER 22. That the resurrection ought to be maintained not so much from the preaching of the Scriptures as from the very necessity of things. But malice is not so strong as to prevail over the divine power, nor is the inconstancy of our nature better or more persevering than the wisdom of God.
所以致命的毒既勝過了人的生命,於是人—這偉大之物、偉大之名、神聖本性的塑形—正如先知所說,便被拋下,如同虛空。因此神的形像,乃在我們裡面被認為至善的事物中得以正確地辨認;而凡在我們生活中顯為可憐可悲者,都被證為全然與神聖的相似有別。第二十二章:論復活之當被持守,與其說是出於聖經的宣講,毋寧說是出於事物本身的必然。然而惡毒並非強到能勝過神的權能,我們本性的反覆無常也不比神的智慧更善、更恆久。
9:169
Non enim possibile est ut mutabile hoc et convertibile tena­ cius existat et firmius quam ad ipsum quod jugitpr permanet, et in bono sine ulla commutatione perdu­ rat. Divinum igitur consilium prorsus incommutabile semper est, mutabilitas autem nostrae substantiæ nec in malo retinet firmitatem. Quod enim semper mo­ vetur, siquidem ad bonum tendit ejus accessus pro­ pter infinitam rem quam proficiendo consequitur, nunquam terminabitur illius in anterior. progressio, quia non poterit hujus quem quaerit ullum terminum reperire, quo comprehenso motus suus debeat quan­ doque consistere.
For it is not possible that this mutable and convertible thing should exist more tenaciously and more firmly than that very thing which abides perpetually and endures in good without any change. The divine counsel therefore is always utterly immutable, but the mutability of our substance retains firmness not even in evil. For that which is always moved—if indeed its advance tends toward the good—because of the infinite thing which it attains by progressing, its progression into what lies before will never be terminated, since it will not be able to find any limit of that which it seeks, by the grasping of which its motion must at some time come to a stand.
因為這可變、可轉之物,斷不可能比那永遠常存、毫無變化地在善中持守者,更為堅韌、更為穩固。所以神聖的旨意總是全然不變的,而我們本質的可變性,甚至在惡中也不持守堅定。因為那總在運動者—倘其前進是趨向善—因它藉進步所達到的那無限之物,它向前的進展永不止息,因為它尋不著它所尋求者的任何止境,使其運動藉著掌握此止境,必在某時止住。
9:170
Si vero ad contrarium deflectat cjus intentio, ubi nequitiæ peregerit cursum, et ad summum fastigium mali pervenerit, tunc jugis se moventis impetus nullum statum de sua natura repe­ riens, ubi malitiæ spatia determinata cucurrerit, ne­ cessario molum jam ad optima quæque convertet. Cum enim malitia nullatenus indeterminate promo­ veatur, sed necessariis finibus includatur, consequen­ ter mali terminus erit boni successio, et ita, sicut dictum est, natura nostra, quæ semper imnota esU quadam regressione boni deinceps iter excurrit, me­ moria malorum quibus aflecta est, ne rursus ad simi­ lia recedat erudita.
But if its intention bend to the contrary, when it has run through the course of wickedness and arrived at the topmost summit of evil, then the impulse of the ever-moving thing, finding no rest of its own nature, when it has run through the determined spaces of malice, will necessarily turn its motion now to whatsoever things are best. For since malice is by no means moved indeterminately, but is enclosed by necessary bounds, consequently the limit of evil will be the succession of good; and so, as has been said, our nature, which is ever in motion, by a certain return runs thereafter the path of good, having been instructed by the memory of the evils with which it was afflicted, lest it fall away again to the like.
但若它的傾向轉向相反,當它跑盡邪惡的路程、到了惡的最高之巔,那時那永動之物的衝力,在自己本性中尋不著安息,既跑遍惡毒既定的空間,便必然把它的運動轉向凡至善之事。因為惡毒斷不被無定限地推動,乃被必要的界限所圈圍,於是惡的盡頭便是善的接續;如此,正如所說,我們那永在運動的本性,藉某種歸回,此後便奔向善的路途,因被它所受諸惡的記憶所教導,免得再退落於相似之事。
9:171
Iterum ergo cursus noster erit in bonis, propter quod necessariis, ut dixi, finibus natura malitiæ probetur esse præscripta; et sicut aiunt bi qui de rebus sublimibus disputant, superio­ ribus mundi partibus universum mundum luce com­ pleri, tenebras autem ex umbra terreni corporis et oppilatione generari; (et hoc quidem juxta figuram corporis in modum sphæræ collecti, et post tergum solis radios coni instar excludentes accedere);
Again therefore our course will be in good things, because, as I have said, the nature of malice is proved to be prescribed by necessary bounds. And just as those who dispute about sublime matters say, the whole world is filled with light in the upper parts of the world, but darkness is generated from the shadow of the earthly body and from its obstruction (and this indeed according to the figure of the body gathered into the manner of a sphere, and the rays of the sun behind its back being shut out come on in the likeness of a cone);
所以我們的路程必再在善之中,因為正如我所說,惡毒的本性被證明乃以必要的界限所限定。又正如那些論述崇高之事者所說,整個世界在世界的上部充滿光明,黑暗卻是從屬地之體的影、並從其阻擋而生(而這固然是照那聚成球形之體的形狀,太陽在其背後的光線被遮蔽,便以圓錐的樣式臨近);
9:172
solem vero mullo quam terra est majoris magnitudinis existentem, undique eam suis in circuitu radiis am­ bire juxta coni termioum emissiones luminis amo­ ventem, ita ul si concedatur alicui quadam firtute, mensuram illam in quam extenditur umbra transire, erit profecto semper in lumine, nullis occurrentibus tenebris; sic arbitror et de nobis excogitari debere, quod egressi fines malitiæ, ut in summis fuerimus feccatorum tenebris collocati, rursus versemur in lumine post sæcula nullis comprehensa terminis, vel­ uti mensunam umbre bonorum superexcellentem substantiam. Rursus ergo paradisus, rursus omne illud lignum, quod et bonum vita est, rursus imaginis gratia et dignitas principatus.
but the sun, being of a magnitude much greater than the earth, surrounds it on every side with its rays in a circuit, sending forth the emissions of light beyond the boundary of the cone; so that if it be granted to anyone, by a certain power, to pass beyond that measure to which the shadow extends, he will assuredly be ever in the light, with no darkness meeting him. So I think it ought to be devised concerning us also: that having gone forth from the bounds of malice—so that we had been placed in the highest darkness of sins—we should again be turned in the light, after ages comprehended by no bounds, the substance of good things over-excelling, as it were, the measure of the shadow. Again therefore paradise, again all that tree which is also the good of life, again the grace of the image and the dignity of headship.
然而太陽既比地大得多,便在四圍以其光線環抱大地,把光的射放發到圓錐的界限以外;以致若有人蒙某種能力,得越過那影所延伸的限度,他必常在光中,毫無黑暗臨到。如此我以為論到我們也當這樣設想:我們既出了惡毒的界限—以致我們曾被置於罪那至深的黑暗中—便要在歷世(不被任何界限所限)之後,重新轉於光中,那善之本質彷彿超越那影的限度。所以再有樂園,再有那「也是生命之善」的整棵樹,再有形像的恩典與元首的尊榮。
9:173
Nec milri videtur ho­ rum quæ nunc ad vitæ necessarios usus a Deo homi­ nibus data sunt, sed quodam rei alterius spes repro­ mittatur, cujus ratio ineffabilis approbetnr. Sed con­ sequentia eorum quæ discutimus prosequamur. CAPUT XXIII. Adversus eos qui dicunt : Si bona et optima est resurrec­ tio mortuorum, cur non olim facta est, sed quibus­ dam temporum circuitionibus sustinetur. Fortassis enim quis ad dulcedinem tante spei co­ gitalione succensus, grave onus magnumque putat esse dispendium, quod non ocius ad illa bona perve­ niat, quæ humanum sensum scientiamque transcen­ dunt, moleste ferens intercapedinem temporis, quæ dilatione sui desiderata distendit.
Nor does it seem to me that the hope is promised back to us of these things which are now given by God to men for the necessary uses of life, but a hope of some other thing, whose account is proved to be ineffable. But let us pursue the consequence of the things we are discussing. CHAPTER 23. Against those who say: If the resurrection of the dead is good and best, why was it not done long ago, but is held back through certain circuits of times? For perhaps someone, kindled in thought by the sweetness of so great a hope, thinks it a heavy burden and a great loss that he does not more quickly arrive at those good things which transcend human sense and knowledge, bearing with annoyance the interval of time, which by the delay of itself prolongs the things desired.
在我看來,所應許歸還給我們的,並非如今神為生命必需之用所賜給人的這些東西,乃是某種別樣之物的盼望,其道理被證明為難以言喻。但讓我們追究我們所討論之事的後續。第二十三章:駁斥那些說「若死人復活是善是至善,為何不早就成就,反藉某些時間的循環而被延宕」的人。因為或許有人,思想中被如此偉大盼望的甘甜所點燃,便以為「不更快到達那超越人之感官與知識的諸善」乃是沉重的擔子與極大的損失,不耐地忍受那段時間的間隔—這間隔藉其自身的遲延,把所渴慕之物拉長了。
9:174
Verum non angu­ stetur sicut parvulus, modicam voluptatis morulam impaticnter exspelans. Nam quia ratione et sapien­ tia dispensantur universa, necesse est qUæ'cunque fiunt non sine ratione et sapientia contineri. Dicis itaque mihi : Quæ est ista ratio, per quam non datur statim id ad quod dcsideratur ab hac vita molestissima pervenire, sed certis præfinita temporibus gravis hæc et temporalis conversatio totius consummationis terminum sustinet, ut tunc humana vita, veluti qui­ busdam absoluta repagulis, quieta rursum ac libcra a l beatum et impassibilem statum futuræ contempla- tionis occurrat ? Sed ad hæc.
But let him not be straitened like a little child, impatiently awaiting a brief little delay of pleasure. For since all things are dispensed by reason and wisdom, it is necessary that whatever things come to be are contained not without reason and wisdom. You say therefore to me: What is this reason, by which it is not granted immediately to attain that which is desired—to come from this most troublesome life—but, predefined by fixed times, this grievous and temporal mode of life awaits the limit of the whole consummation, so that then human life, as though loosed from certain bars, may again run, quiet and free, to the blessed and impassible state of the contemplation to come? But to these things.
但願他不要像小孩子那樣被困住,不耐地等候快樂那短暫的小遲延。因為既然萬事都藉理性與智慧分配,所以凡所成之事,必然無不被理性與智慧所包含。那麼你對我說:這是甚麼道理,使人不得立刻達到所渴慕的—就是從這至為煩惱的生命中出來—反倒被定準的時候所預定,這沉重而暫時的生活景況竟要等候那全部成全的盡頭,好叫人的生命到那時彷彿從某些閂閘中得釋放,再次安靜自由地奔向將來默觀那有福、不受苦痛的境地?但對於這些。
9:175
utrum veritati propin­ .quet ralio, de his quæ perquiruntur ipsa evidenter veritas noverit; quod autem nostram subit intelligen­ tiam tale est. Dico etenim sermonem primum rur­ sum assumens quo dixerit Deus : Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram : imago quippe Dei perfecta in omni humana natura modum perfe­ ctionis est consecuta. Adam vero necdum formatus est, terrena vero conditio juxta quamdam sui nominis expressionem dicitur Adam, ut asserunt qui Hebrææ linguae periti sunt. Idcirco et Apostolus patria voce, iJ est, Israelitarum sufficienter instructus, hominem de terra terrenum nominat, velut in Græcum sonum Adx vocabulum transferens.
Whether the reasoning approaches the truth concerning these things which are sought out, the truth itself evidently knows; but that which comes under our understanding is of this kind. For I say, taking up again the first discourse in which God said: 'Let us make man to our image and likeness'; the image of God indeed has attained the measure of perfection perfect in all human nature. But Adam was not yet formed; the earthly condition, according to a certain expression of its own name, is called 'Adam,' as those assert who are skilled in the Hebrew tongue. Therefore the Apostle too, sufficiently instructed in his native speech, that is, of the Israelites, names man 'of the earth, earthy,' as it were transferring the word 'Adam' into the Greek sound.
關於所追究的這些事,那推理是否接近真理,唯有真理本身顯然知道;而那進入我們悟性者,乃是這樣的。因為我要再取起那起初的論述,就是神所說的:「我們要照著我們的形像、按著我們的樣式造人」;神的形像實在已在全人性中達到完全的程度。然而亞當尚未受造;那屬地的受造之物,照其名稱的某種表達,被稱為「亞當」,正如那些精通希伯來語者所斷言的。因此使徒既在他本族—即以色列人—的言語上得了充分的教導,便稱人為「出於地,屬土」,彷彿把「亞當」一字轉成希臘語的音。
9:176
Factus est igitur ad imaginem homo universalis, si natura Deo simillima, et factus est ab omnipotenti sapientia non pars to­ tius, sed omnis naturae simul plenitudo. Vidit autem quia omnes fines continet, sicut Scriptura commemo­ rat, quia in manu ejus omnes fines terra!; vidit qui novit orania antequam fiant, divina scientia cuncta complectens, quanta juxta numerum in singulos fu­ tura esset humanitas. Et quia pariter quoque vidit figmentum ad malum nisus habere proniores, et quod ab angelica dignitate sponte defluens, communi na­ turæ humillime necteretur, idcirco quiddam de irra­ tionalibus imagini suae permiscuit.
Universal man therefore was made to the image, if his nature is most like to God; and he was made by the almighty wisdom not as a part of the whole, but as the fulness of all nature at once. And He saw that it contains all the bounds, as Scripture commemorates, that 'in His hand are all the bounds of the earth'; He saw, who knew all things before they came to be, embracing all things by divine knowledge, how great the humanity would be in each individual according to number. And because He likewise saw that the figment had its endeavours more prone to evil, and that, of its own accord flowing down from the angelic dignity, it would be most humbly knit to common nature, therefore He mingled something of the irrational creatures with His own image.
所以普世的人乃是按形像所造,倘其本性極像神;他被全能的智慧所造,並非作為整體的一部分,乃是同時作為全本性的豐盛。神看見它包含一切界限,正如經上所記,「地的一切界限都在祂手中」;那在萬事未成之先就知道萬事者看見了,以神聖的知識包羅萬事,知道照數目而論,人類在每一個體中要有多少。又因祂同樣看見那受造之物所傾的努力更易向惡,並看見它自願從天使的尊榮中下流,要極卑微地與共通的本性相連,所以祂把無理性受造物的某些東西摻入祂自己的形像之中。
9:177
Non enim est in illa divina et beatissima natura differentia maris et feminæ, sed quamdam proprietatem irrationalis, ut dixi, formationis ad hominem transtulit, nequaquam Iuxta creationem illam sublimissimam multiplica- tionem nostrae generationis instituens. ( Non enim quando ad imaginem Dei fecit) tunc crescere. mul­ tiplicari homines imperavit, sed quando fecit mas­ culi et feminæ differentiam, tunc ait: Crescite et mul- tiplicamin;, et implete terram, quod non est divinae naturae, sed irrationabilis proprium , sicut historiæ textus ostendit, quæ primitus hic de irrationalibus a Deo prolata fuisse significat.
For in that divine and most blessed nature there is no difference of male and female, but He transferred to man a certain property of the irrational, as I have said, of formation, by no means establishing the multiplication of our generation according to that most sublime creation. (For it was not when He made man to the image of God) that He then commanded men to grow and multiply, but when He made the difference of male and female, then He said: 'Increase and multiply, and fill the earth'—which is not of the divine nature, but proper to the irrational, as the text of the history shows, which signifies that this was first uttered here by God concerning the irrational creatures.
因為在那神聖至福的本性中並無男女之別,但祂如我所說,把無理性受造物之構造的某種特性轉給了人,斷非照那至為崇高的創造來設立我們生育的繁衍。(因為祂按神形像造人時)並非那時吩咐人生養眾多,乃是當祂造出男女之別時,才說:「要生養眾多,遍滿地面」—這並非屬神聖本性的,乃是無理性受造物所固有的,正如歷史的經文所顯明,它表明此言乃是神先在此處論到無理性受造物而說的。
9:178
Quod si prius differen­ tiam masculi fecisset in aobis et feminae, et per hanc vocem qua dictum est: Crescite, vim multiplicationis homini contulisset, nequaquam generationis hujus indigeremus specie, per quam irrationabilia contem­ plantur. Quia igilur ante contemplatus est virtute præscientiæ suæ Deus plenitudinem hominum per animalem procreationem ad vitam esse venturam, qui cuncta ordine et ratione dispensat, hanc homini generationis speciem necessariam condidit, quae ad humilitatem naturae nostræ proclivior foret, quam vidit antequam fieret, qui futura tanquam præsentia contuetur.
But if He had first made the difference of male in us and of female, and through that word by which it was said 'Increase' had conferred on man the power of multiplication, we would by no means need this kind of generation, through which the irrational creatures are contemplated. Since therefore God by the power of His foreknowledge foresaw beforehand that the fulness of men would come into being for life through animal procreation, He who dispenses all things in order and reason established for man this kind of generation as necessary—a kind which would be more proclive to the humility of our nature, which He saw before it came to be, who beholds future things as present.
但若祂先在我們裡面造出男之別與女之別,並藉那說「要生養」之言把繁衍之能賜給人,我們就斷不需要這藉以觀看無理性受造物的生育方式了。所以既然神憑祂預知之能預先看見人類的豐盛要藉動物式的繁殖進入生命,那位按次序與理性分配萬事者,便為人設立了這必需的生育方式—一種更傾向於我們本性卑微的方式,這是祂在它未成之先就看見的,因祂視將來如現在。
9:179
Idcirco ad creationem hominum mensu­ ram quoque temporis ante disposuit, ut juxta com­ morationem prædestinatarum in hoc mundo anima­ rum simul et mora temporis tenderetur, et tunc ip­ sius temporis fluens motus tandem aliquando consis­ teret, cum jam in eo humanum genus oriri non pos­ set. Consummata ergo gcneratione hominum, simul quoque tempus deliciet, et sic restitutio fiet omnium, in qua universali transformatione commutabitur ge­ nus humanum, a corruptibili et terreno statu ad im­ passibilem transiens et æternum, quod mihi videtur et sanctus Apostolus ad Corintbios stationem subitam tem­ poris, et econtrario resolutionem rerum praedixisse mobilium, in quibus ait:
Therefore for the creation of men He also predisposed beforehand the measure of time, so that according to the sojourn of the predestined souls in this world the duration of time too should be stretched out together, and then at length the flowing motion of time itself should at some time come to a stand, when the human race could no longer arise in it. The generation of men therefore being consummated, time likewise will also fail, and so the restitution of all things shall come to pass, in which by a universal transformation the human race will be changed, passing from a corruptible and earthly state to one impassible and eternal—which it seems to me the holy Apostle too foretold to the Corinthians, the sudden cessation of time and, on the contrary, the dissolution of mutable things, in which he says:
所以為著造人,祂也預先安排了時間的限度,好叫照那預定之眾靈魂在這世界的寄居,時間的長度也一同被拉長,然後時間本身那流動的運動終於在某時止住,就是當人類在其中再不能興起的時候。所以人類的生育既已成全,時間也必照樣止息,於是萬物的復興必要成就,在這復興中,人類要藉普世的變化而被改變,從可朽屬地的境地過渡到不受苦痛、永恆的境地—這在我看來,那聖使徒也曾向哥林多人預言過,就是時間的驟然止息,以及反之,那些可變之物的解體,他在其中說:
9:180
Ecce myaterium vobis dicoromnes quidem resurgemus, sed non omnes immutabimur, in mo­ mento, in ictu oculi, in novissima tula.
Behold, I tell you a mystery: we shall all indeed rise again, but we shall not all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet.
看哪,我把一件奧祕告訴你們:我們眾人固然都要復活,卻不是都要改變,乃是在一霎時,眨眼之間,在末次的號筒響的時候。
9:181
Cum enim pleni­ tudo, ut arbitror, humanæ naturæ juxta præscitum a Deo modum ad suos venerit terminos, quibus ad in­ crementum numeri animarum nihil ulterius desit, in momento temporis eorum quæ sunt commutationem fieri docuit, momentum nominans et ictum oculi illius temporis individuum et sine ulla distantia terminum, ita ut nequaquam possibile sit juxta novissimum et supreraum quidquam plus celeritatis accedere, pro­ pter quod multa pars extremitati relinquetur, quæ hanc circumactam commutationem in morte possi- deat, sed mox ut resurrectionis insonuerit tuba, quæ tunc excitatura est mortuos, et his qui in vita re­ perti fuerint juxta similitudinem eorum qui de mortuis resurrexerint immutatis, ad incorruptionem pariter venient, ut jam nequaquam deorsum preman­ tur corporeo pondere, nec eos moles terrena deti­ neat, sed sublimiter in aera perferantur.
For when the fullness of human nature, as I judge, shall have come to its appointed limits according to the measure foreknown by God, so that nothing further is lacking for the increase of the number of souls, he taught that in a moment of time the change of the things that are will take place, naming as 「a moment」 and 「the twinkling of an eye」 that indivisible point of time which is its limit without any interval, so that it is by no means possible for any greater swiftness to be added at the last and uttermost instant, on account of which a large part should be left over at the extremity to possess this completed change in death; but as soon as the trumpet of the resurrection shall have sounded—the trumpet that will then awaken the dead—and when those who are found alive shall be changed after the likeness of those who rise from the dead, they shall come together to incorruption, so that they may no longer be pressed down by bodily weight, nor be held back by any earthly mass, but be borne aloft on high into the air.
因為依我看,當人性的全數按著神所預知的限度達到其終點,以致再無一物可缺於靈魂數目的增添之時,他便教導說,在一霎時之間,那存在之物的改變必要發生;他稱那不可分割、毫無間距的時間之點為「一霎時」與「眨眼之間」,作為其終限,以致在那末了至極的瞬間,斷不可能再加上任何更快的速度,因此也斷不會有一大部分被留在末端,以在死中承受這已完成的改變;反倒當復活的號筒一響——那號筒那時要喚醒死人——並當那些活著被遇見的人按著從死裡復活之人的樣式被改變時,他們就一同進入不朽壞,以致不再被身體的重量所壓制,也不被地上的質塊所羈絆,乃要崇高地被提到空中。
9:182
Rapiemur enim, inquit Apostolus, in nubibus obviam Domino in aera. Et ita semper cum Domino erimus. Igitur exspectamus tempus illud, quod nunc necessario humanis incrementis extenditur. Nam et Abraham, et qui cum eo patriarchae sunt habuerunt quidem desiderium videre bona Domini, nec quiverunt coe­ lestem patriam perquirere, sicut idem dicit aposto­ ius : scd tum adhuc gratia spci sunt constituti, Deo pro nobis melius providente, juxta ejusdem beati Pauli vocem , ne sine nobis consummarentur.
For we shall be caught up, says the Apostle, in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air; and so we shall ever be with the Lord. Therefore we await that time, which is now of necessity extended by the increase of mankind. For Abraham too, and the patriarchs who were with him, had indeed the desire to see the good things of the Lord, yet they were not able to attain the heavenly fatherland they sought, as the same Apostle says; but at that time they were still established in the grace of hope, God providing some better thing for us, according to the words of the same blessed Paul, that they should not be made perfect without us.
使徒說:我們必被提到雲裡,在空中與主相遇;這樣,我們就要永遠與主同在。所以我們等候那時候,那時候如今因人類的增多而必然延長。因為亞伯拉罕和與他同在的列祖,固然有願望要看見主的美善,卻不能尋得他們所求的天上家鄉,正如這位使徒所說;只是那時他們仍立於盼望的恩典中,因為神為我們預備了更美的事,正如這同一位有福的保羅所言,叫他們若沒有我們,就不能完全。
9:183
Si igitur illi dilalionem hanc æquanimiter pertulerunt, qui de longe spe sola atque fide cernentes bona Do­ mini et salutantes ea, sicut testatur Apostolus, cer­ tam sperandarum rerum jucunditatem in eo tantum­ modo collocarunt, quod fidelem promissorem con­ fisi sunt, quid hos plures convenit æstimare, quibus forstan nec ad meliorem spes ex vitae potest quali- Late suppetere? Defecit et præ desiderio prophetæ anima, qui per psalmodiam amoris sui magnitudinem conlitetur et dicit: Concupiscit et deficit anima mea in atria Domini, et si eum in extremis projici con­ tingat, id postulat, tanquam majus sit atque præstan­ tius, in illis esse novissimum, quam primum in ta- bernaculis peccatorum.
If therefore those men bore this delay with equanimity, who, beholding from afar by hope and faith alone the good things of the Lord and saluting them, as the Apostle testifies, placed the sure gladness of the things to be hoped for in this one thing only—that they trusted the faithful Promiser—how much more should we esteem these many, to whom perhaps not even a hope of a better life can be supplied from the quality of their living? The soul of the prophet also failed for longing, who through his psalmody confesses the greatness of his love and says: My soul longs and faints for the courts of the Lord; and if it should befall him to be cast among the lowest, he requests this, as though it were something greater and more excellent, to be the last in those courts than to be first in the tents of sinners.
所以那些人既如此泰然忍受這延遲——他們單憑盼望與信德從遠處望見並迎接主的美善,正如使徒所見證的,把所盼望之事那確實的喜樂全然安放在這一件事上:就是信靠那信實的應許者——那麼這眾多的人,他們或許連從生命的品質中也得不著更美盼望的供應,我們豈不更當看重他們嗎?先知的心靈也因渴慕而困乏,他藉著詩歌承認他愛的浩大,說:我的心靈渴想羨慕,以至困乏,要進入主的院宇;他若至終被拋於最卑微之處,他便如此祈求,彷彿那是更大更卓越的事:寧在那院中為末後,勝於在惡人的帳棚中為首。
9:184
Verumtamen dilationis erat patientissimus, beatificans quidem illam conversa­ tionem brevemque participationem ejus millibus præsentis temporis anteponens. Melior enim est, in­ quit, dies una in atriis tu s super millia. Sed tamen necessariam dispensationem eorum quæ geruntur non ægerrime terebat. Idonea vero res ad heatitu­ dinem constat hominibus, quod bona sperare non desinant; idcirco idem propheta in line ipsius psalmi ponit et dicit : Domine Deus virtutum, beatus homo qui sperat in te. Non itaque convenit parvam curam eorum quæ ventura sunt angusto pectore retinere. Sed ne potius a promissis excidamus, studium nos oportet impendere.
Nevertheless he was most patient of delay, counting that mode of life blessed and preferring even a brief share of it to thousands of days of the present time. For better, he says, is one day in your courts above thousands. Yet he did not bear with extreme distress the necessary dispensation of the things that are done. And it is established as a thing suited to the blessedness of men, that they should not cease to hope for good things; therefore the same prophet places at the end of that very psalm and says: O Lord God of hosts, blessed is the man who hopes in you. It is not fitting, then, to confine within a narrow breast a scanty care for the things that are to come; but rather, lest we fall away from the promises, we ought to expend our zeal.
然而他極能忍耐延遲,視那種生活為有福,甚至寧取其中短暫的分,勝過今世的千日。他說:在你院宇住一日,勝似千日。然而他對於所行之事那必要的安排,並不極其憂苦地忍受。對人的有福而言,有一件相宜的事是確定的,就是他們不可停止盼望美善;因此這同一位先知在那詩篇的末了說:萬軍之耶和華神啊,倚靠你的人便為有福。所以,不該以狹窄的胸懷僅存對將來之事的微小掛念;倒不如,為免我們從應許上墜落,我們應當竭力盡心。
9:185
Quemadmodum enim si quis me inexpertu it rudemque præmoneat, quod æstatis tem- pore fructuum fiat opulenta collectio, et replebuntur < quidem liorrea frugibus, mensa vero copia ipsius ubertatis ciliis erit referta quamplurimis, vanus profecto videbitur, si adventum tem oris anticipare festinet, qui debet utique primum semina spargere, fructusque sibi diligentia ipsa praeparare, velit nolit. Tempus enim sicut præfixum est veniet, quod non similiter excipient hi qui sibi provident abundantiam frugum, et qui omni apparatu vacui hora ipsa fue­ rint comprehensi:
For just as, if someone should forewarn me, inexperienced and untaught, that in the summer season there comes a rich gathering of fruits, and the barns will indeed be filled with crops, and the table will be heaped with the very abundance of plenty in most plentiful dishes, he will surely seem a vain man if he hastens to anticipate the coming of the season, who ought first of all to scatter the seeds and by that very diligence to prepare the fruits for himself, willing or unwilling. For the time, as it was fixed beforehand, will come, which those will not receive in like manner who provide for themselves an abundance of crops, and those who shall have been caught at that very hour empty of all preparation:
因為正如,若有人預先警告我這無經驗、未受教者,說在夏季必有豐盛的果實收成,倉廩固然要充滿五穀,筵席也要堆滿那豐裕本身,盛在極多的盤中——那人若急於要搶在時令之前,必顯為虛妄,因為他本當首先撒種,並藉那勤勞為自己預備果實,無論願意不願意。因為那時候既已預定,就必來到;那些為自己預備了豐盛五穀的人,與那些到了那時候卻毫無預備、空空被擒住的人,必不一樣領受那時候:
9:186
sic et nobis arbitror expedire, cum sit omnibus patefactum prædicatione divina quæ nunc geritur, futurum tempus nostre commutationis insistere, non tempora discutere quæ ventura sunt, quia non esse nostrum ait Scriptura nosse tempora vel momenta, neque cogitationes aliquas exquirere, quibus a spe resurrectionis anima debilitata lasses­ cat. Std si qua credulitas eorum quæ promittuntur in nobis est, debemus, conversationis optimæ stu­ diis inhærentes, futuram gratiæ antiquitatem ipsam venerabilem æquanimiter opperiri. CAPUT XXIV. Quod qui exordium consti utionis mundi fatetur, ne­ cessario ejus etiam de fine concedat.
so also for us, I judge, it is expedient—since it has been made plain to all by the divine preaching which is now carried on that the future time of our change is at hand—not to scrutinize the times that are to come, since Scripture says it is not for us to know the times or the seasons, nor to search out any speculations by which the soul, weakened, should grow weary from the hope of the resurrection. But if there is in us any belief of the things that are promised, we ought, cleaving to the pursuits of the best manner of life, to await with equanimity that future and venerable antiquity of grace itself. CHAPTER XXIV. That whoever confesses the beginning of the world's establishment must of necessity concede also concerning its end.
所以我判斷,對我們也是有益的——既然如今所傳的神聖宣講已向眾人顯明,我們改變的將來時候已近——我們不該推究那將來的時候,因為聖經說,知道時候日期不是我們的事,也不該尋求任何臆測,叫心靈軟弱,因復活的盼望而疲乏。但我們裡面若有對所應許之事的任何信念,就當持守那最善生活之道的追求,泰然等候那將來而可敬的、恩典本身的古遠。第二十四章:凡承認世界受造之開端者,必然也當承認其終結。
9:187
Si quis autem mundi cursum qui nunc est quadam scse lege moventem conspiciens, per quam spatium Labitur temporale, nequaquam dicat mobilium ces­ sationem quæ prædicta est posse contingere, mani­ festum est bic quod nec in principio factum a Deo cœlum terramque fateatur. Qui enim principium mo­ tus credit, de fine omnino non ambigit : qui vero finem non recipit, contat eum nec initium accepisse. Sed sicut fide aptata esse sæcula intelligimus Verbo Dei, sicut Apostolus ait, ut -ex invisibilibus visibiia fierent, eadem fide utemur de Verbo Dei, qui neces­ sariam eorum quæ sunt translationem fore prædixit. Quo autem id fiat modo, curiosi est quærere.
But if anyone, beholding the course of this present world moving by a certain law of its own—by which the span of time slips away—should by no means say that the cessation of moving things which has been foretold can come to pass, it is manifest that he does not confess that in the beginning heaven and earth were made by God. For whoever believes in a beginning of motion in no way doubts about its end; but whoever does not admit an end, it follows that it received no beginning either. But just as we understand by faith that the ages were framed by the Word of God, as the Apostle says, so that out of things invisible the visible things came to be, by the same faith we shall reason concerning the Word of God, who foretold that there would be a necessary transformation of the things that are. But in what manner this happens, it is the part of an over-curious man to inquire.
但若有人觀看這現今世界的進程,乃按其自有的某種定律運行——時間的長度藉此而流逝——卻斷然說那預言過的、運動之物的止息不能成就,那麼顯然他並不承認太初神創造了天地。因為凡相信運動有開端的,斷不懷疑它有終結;但凡不承認有終結的,就推得它也未曾領受開端。然而正如我們憑信明白諸世界是藉神的道所造,正如使徒所說,使那看得見的是從那看不見的而出,照樣我們也要憑這同一信德推論那神的道,他既預言那存在之物必有必要的遷變。至於這事如何發生,要追問就是過於好奇之人的事了。
9:188
Nam et ibi perfecta esse quæ videntur, ex invisibilium fide percipimus, inquisitionem incomprehensibilium trans­ euntes : quinimo cum de multis ignorare nos sermo commoneut, non parvam satisfactionem de rerum credendarum ambiguitate concessit. Liceret enim contentiosis et ibidem quibusdam argumentationibus fidem consequenter evertere, ne de materiali con­ ditione vera esse putetur oratio quam sancta Scri­ ptura pronuntiat, omnia quæ sunt, ex Deo esse con- firmans. Qui vero contraria ratione nituntur, coaeter­ nam Deo dicunt esse materiam, talibus argumentis suum dogma fingentes :
For there too we perceive by faith in things invisible that the things which are seen are perfect, passing by the searching out of incomprehensible matters; nay rather, since the discourse admonishes us to be ignorant of many things, it has granted no small satisfaction concerning the ambiguity of things to be believed. For it would be permitted to the contentious by certain argumentations there too to overthrow faith consequently, lest the discourse which holy Scripture pronounces be thought true concerning the material condition, affirming that all things that are, are from God. But those who strive by the contrary reasoning say that matter is co-eternal with God, fashioning their dogma by such arguments:
因為在那裡我們也藉著對不可見之物的信,認出那看得見的乃是完全的,越過了對不可測之事的探究;不但如此,既然這論述勸戒我們對許多事當存無知,它也就在當信之事的疑難上賜下了不小的安慰。因為在那裡,好爭辯者也可以藉某些論證隨之顛覆信德,免得聖經所宣告的論述——它斷言一切存在之物都是出於神——被人當作是論及物質的境況才為真。然而那些以相反的理路力爭的人,卻說物質與神同永,用這樣的論據捏造他們的教條:
9:189
Si simplicis Deus naturæ est, sine materia utique et sine quantitate, et sine mole, et sine compositione est, cujuslibet figuræ præscriptionis alienus existens. Omnis autem materia in spatiorum distentione perspicitur, comprehensionem sensuum ne. quaquam prorsus effugiens, quæ in colore ac figura, mole quoque et qualitate et impressione vel duri­ tia, ac reliquis similibus rebus agnoscitur : quo­ rum nihil in natura divina potest penitus inveniri. Quod ergo machinamentum est, ut ex eo quod nulla distantia præscribitur, natura procedat, quæ distantiis continetur?
If God is of a simple nature, then surely he is without matter and without quantity, and without mass, and without composition, existing as a stranger to the prescription of any figure. But all matter is discerned in the extension of spaces, by no means escaping the apprehension of the senses, being recognized in color and figure, in mass too and quality and impression or hardness, and the rest of like things—of which nothing can at all be found in the divine nature. What contrivance, then, is it, that from that which is prescribed by no interval there should proceed a nature which is contained by intervals?
若神是單純之性,那麼他必是無物質、無分量、無質塊、無組合的,作為任何形狀界定之外的存在。然而一切物質都是在空間的伸展中被察覺,斷不能逃脫感官的把握,乃是在顏色與形狀中、也在質塊與性質與印痕或硬度、以及其餘類此之事中被認出——這些事在神性中絕無一樣能尋見。那麼這是何等的機巧之說,叫一個由間距所構成之性,竟從那毫無間距界定者而出?
9:190
Si enim hæc exinde credun­ tur existerc, certum est quod inhærere illi , ct juxta ineffabilem rationem, sic in generationis ordi­ ncm pervenisse putanda sunt. Si autem in eo res est materialis, quomodo materialis ipse non est, qui in se materiam continet ? Similiter autem, et omnia quibus materialis natura figuratur : si ideo ergo cre­ ditur esse quantitas, quomodo sine quantitate est Deus? Si in eo quod compositum est, quomodo ipse simplex et sine compositione est ? Unde eum aut materialem esse necesse est, quia ex ipso subsistere materiam ratiocinatio ipsa compellit. Aut si quisquam hoc refugit, extrinsecus introductam esse materiam ad constitutionem universorum nihilominus aestima­ bit.
For if these things are believed to exist from thence, it is certain that they must be thought to inhere in him, and, according to an ineffable manner, to have come thus into the order of generation. But if matter is in him, how is he himself not material, who contains matter in himself? And likewise too with all the things by which material nature is figured: if therefore quantity is on this account believed to be, how is God without quantity? If he is in that which is composite, how is he himself simple and without composition? Whence it is necessary either that he be material, because the very reasoning compels matter to subsist from him; or, if anyone shrinks from this, he will nonetheless reckon that matter was introduced from without for the constitution of all things.
因為這些事若被信為從那裡而存在,那麼必當認為它們是內存於他,並且照著一種不可言說的方式,如此進入了受生的次序。但物質若在他裡面,那麼他自己——那在自身中含有物質者——豈不就是物質的麼?同樣,凡物質之性藉以成形的一切,也是如此:那麼若因此而信有分量,神又怎能無分量呢?他若在那有組合者之中,他自己又怎能單純而無組合呢?由此或必說他是物質的,因為這推理本身逼使物質從他而存;或若有人迴避這點,他仍不得不認為物質是從外面被引入,以構成萬有。
9:191
Si igitur extraneum erat, aliud præeter Dominum fuisse constabit, qui simul intelligatur secundum ra­ tionem perennitatis cum ingenito substitisse, ita ut duo principia pariter ingenita ratiocinatio colligat, ejusscilicet qui artificiosius operatur, et qui hancdisci­ plinabilem formam bujus operationis excipiet. Si qui! autem veluti necessitate compulsus, supponat sempi­ ternam omnium conditorum materiam, quam tunc Manichæus suorum dogmatum favorem defensionem­ que reperiet , qui materialem causam juxta ingeniti ingenerationem bonae naturæ coxquare contendit ?
If therefore it was something extraneous, it will be established that there existed something besides the Lord, which would be understood, according to the principle of perpetuity, to have subsisted together with the Unbegotten, so that the reasoning gathers two principles alike unbegotten—namely, of him who works the more skillfully, and of that which receives this disciplined form of his working. But if anyone, as though compelled by necessity, should suppose the matter of all created things to be everlasting, what favor and defense of his dogmas will the Manichaean then find, who strives to make the material cause equal to the unbegottenness of the good nature according to its unbegotten state?
那麼物質若是某種外來之物,就必確立在主之外另有一物存在,這物按永存的原理,要被認為是與那未受生者一同存在的,以致這推理便引出兩個同樣未受生的本原——就是那位較巧妙地施工者,與那承受他這工作所賦之有序形式者。但若有人彷彿被必然所逼,假設一切受造之物的物質是永恆的,那麼摩尼教徒便要為他的教條尋得何等的支持與辯護呢?他正是力爭要使物質之因,按其未受生之狀,與善之性的未受生相等。
9:192
Sed nos audientes ex Deo esse omnia, Scriptura di­ cente retinemus, et qualiter ex Deo sint, quia super intellectum nostrum est, nequaquam curiose perqui­ rimus, divinam naturam creatricem credentes esse cunctorum, cum et quod ratio erat constituit, et con­ stitutum jam in quam volucrit quantitatem mira commutatione perquireret. Consequenter ergo arini.
But we, hearing that all things are from God, hold fast to it, since Scripture says so; and how they are from God, since it is above our understanding, we by no means curiously search out, believing the divine nature to be the creatrix of all things—since it both established that which reason determined, and would, by a marvelous transformation, bring the thing already established into whatever quantity it willed. Consequently, therefore, we reckon...
但我們既聽見萬物都是出於神,便緊緊持守,因為聖經如此說;至於它們如何出於神,既然這超乎我們的悟性,我們便斷不好奇地探究,乃信神性是萬有的創造者——因為它既建立了理智所定的,又以奇妙的遷變,將那已建立之物帶入它所願意的任何分量。所以,我們隨之推斷……
9:193
tramur ea qua sunt ad illam institutionem quas nec- dum est, divinæ virtutis voluntate posse subsistere, si et consummationem rerum ad ipsius polentiam referentes, in nullo disciplinæ nostræ rationem pro­ pter id quod dicere credimus, assumeremus, quamvis possemus quadam inventione verborum suadere illis qui de materia cuntentionibus disputant, ne auderent facile disputationi nostræ deinceps obviare. De natura cæli, quod non sit ex quatuor elementis se­ cundum Aristotelem. (Caput subsequens ad hunc librum non pertinet, sed e libro de Elementis huc ex argumenti similitu­ dine fortassis irrepsit, quo loco quartum caput est.;
...that the things which are, can by the will of the divine power be brought into being toward that establishment which is not yet—if we, referring also the consummation of things to his power, in nothing assume the reasoning of our own discipline on account of that which we believe ourselves to say; although we might, by a certain invention of words, persuade those who dispute with contentions about matter, so that they would not dare easily to oppose our discourse thereafter. On the nature of heaven, that it is not composed of the four elements according to Aristotle. (The following chapter does not belong to this book, but crept in here from the book On the Elements, perhaps by reason of similarity of argument, in which place it is the fourth chapter.)
……即那存在之物,能藉神聖大能的旨意,被帶入那尚未存在的設立中——倘若我們把萬物的成全也歸於他的能力,就絲毫不憑我們自己學科的推理,去支持我們自信所說的;雖然我們本可藉某種言辭的巧構,去說服那些以爭辯論物質的人,使他們此後不敢輕易抵擋我們的論述。論天的性質,按亞里士多德所說,它並非由四元素所構成。(下一章並不屬於本書,乃是從《論諸元素》那書因論證相似或許混入此處,在該書中為第四章。)
9:194
Aristoteles autem quintum inducit corpus, æthe- reum, inquam, quod in circuitu fertur. nolens cœlum ex quatuor elementis generatum esse ; in circuitu autem ferri dicit hoc quintum corpus, quod circulari circumgyratione moveatur, quod Plato ex igne et terra constare manifeste disserit, ita inquiens : Cor­ poreæ speciei, et visibile et tangibile, quod sit, esse oportet, sine igne autem nihil unquam visibile fiet, neque sine solido tangibile, at solidum nequaquam absque terra existit. Proinde ex igne et terra hujus Universi corpus inchoans Deus fecit, duo autem sine tertio bene consistere nequeunt, vinculo enim utrum­ que coagmentanti opus est;
But Aristotle introduces a fifth body, the ethereal, I mean, which is borne in a circuit, being unwilling that heaven should have been generated from the four elements; and he says that this fifth body is borne in a circuit because it moves by a circular revolution—which Plato plainly argues consists of fire and earth, speaking thus: It is necessary that what is of corporeal kind, both visible and tangible, should be; but without fire nothing will ever become visible, nor anything tangible without something solid, and the solid by no means exists apart from earth. Accordingly, beginning the body of this universe from fire and earth, God made it; but two things cannot well consist without a third, for there is need of a bond joining both together;
但亞里士多德引入第五種物體,我是說那以太體,它被帶於圓周而行,因他不願天是由四元素所生;他說這第五物體被帶於圓周而行,乃因它以圓形旋轉而運動——柏拉圖則明言這物體是由火與土所構成,他如此說:凡屬物體之類、既可見又可觸的,必須存在;但無火則永不能有可見之物,無堅固之物則無可觸之物,而堅固之物斷不能離土而存。因此神便以火與土開始造這宇宙的形體;然而二物若無第三者便不能妥善相合,因為必需有一條紐帶把二者連結;
9:195
vinculum vero optimum est, quod ct se ipsum et quæ colligantur quam maxime unum efficit; hoc autem convenientissime proportio­ nata est periicere, vinculum dicens media duo ele­ menta ex hujusmodi proportione assumpta. At qui Hebræorum doctrinam colunt, de coelo et terra eva­ riant, nam hi quidem fere omnes ex nulla præcedente materia genitum esse cœlum et terram dicunt, quia Moses ait : In principio fecit Deus cælum et terram. Apollinarius autem vult ex abysso fecisse Deum cœ­ lum et terram; verum abyssi ut genitae, Moses de ge­ n ratione cæli non meminit. In Job autem. dictum eat quod fecit abyssum ; ex hoc igitur censet omnia alia gencrata esse;
but the best bond is that which makes both itself and the things bound together as much as possible one; and this proportion is most fittingly suited to accomplish—he calls the bond the two middle elements taken from such a proportion. But those who cultivate the doctrine of the Hebrews differ concerning heaven and earth; for these, indeed nearly all of them, say that heaven and earth were generated from no preceding matter, because Moses says: In the beginning God made heaven and earth. But Apollinarius holds that God made heaven and earth from the abyss; yet Moses, in his account of the generation of heaven, makes no mention of the abyss as having been generated. But in Job it is said that he made the abyss; from this, therefore, he reckons that all other things were generated;
但最好的紐帶乃是那使自身與所連結之物盡可能成為一體者;而這比例最相宜地適於成就此事——他稱那紐帶為從這樣的比例所取的兩個居中元素。然而那些研習希伯來人教訓的,論天地各有不同說法;因為他們幾乎眾人都說天地不是從先在的任何物質所生,因為摩西說:起初神創造天地。但亞波理拿留卻主張神是從深淵造了天地;然而摩西在他論天之受生的記述中,並未提及深淵是受生的。但在約伯記中卻說神造了深淵;他因此便認為其餘萬物都是從此而生;
9:196
non tamen ingenitam vult, sed ante cuncta corpora productam eam esse, et præsum­ psisse a conditore ad aliorum subsistentiam mani­ festationem. Undc abyssi δλης , sed quomodocunque hoc se habeat, nihil refert. Nam et ita omnium Deus conditor ostenditur ex non entibus fecisse omnia. Adversus eos vero qui unum solum elementum esse astruunt, terram, ignem, vel aerem, vel aquam, quæ ab Hippoc rate dicta sunt sufficient. Si enim dun­ taxat unum esset, nunquam doleret homo, neque enim esset a quo doleret si unum existeret; quod si doleret, undenam esset quod sanaret ? Oportet autem ægrum cum sensu transmutari. Si vero unum solum esset elementum, non existeret utique in quod trans- mutaretur;
yet he does not hold it to be unbegotten, but that it was produced before all bodies, and was presupposed by the Creator for the subsistence and manifestation of other things. Whence the abyss of matter (hyle)—but in whatever way this stands, it makes no difference. For thus too the God who is Creator of all is shown to have made all things from things that are not. But against those who maintain that there is one single element only—earth, fire, air, or water—what was said by Hippocrates will suffice. For if there were but one only, a man would never feel pain, for there would be nothing by which he could feel pain if one alone existed; and if he did feel pain, whence would come that which should heal? But the sick man must be changed together with sensation. But if there were one single element only, there would not exist that into which it might be changed;
然而他並不主張深淵是未受生的,乃是說它在一切形體之先被造,並被造物者預先設定,作為其他事物之得以存在與顯明的根基。由此那物質(hyle)的深淵——但無論這事如何,都無關緊要。因為照樣,那萬有的神、創造主,也被顯明是從無造出萬有。然而駁那些主張只有單一元素——土、火、氣或水——者,希波克拉底所說的便足夠了。因為若只有一種,人就永不覺痛,因若只有一者存在,便無一物能使他覺痛;他若覺痛,那使他痊愈的又從何而來?然而病人必須隨感覺一同改變。但若只有單一元素,便不存在那可供它改變而入的對象;
9:197
non transmutatum autem, sed manens in se ipso, nequaquam doleret, etiamsi sensibile foret; at quod patitur ab aliquo pati necesse est. Si itaque unum modo esset elementum, præter illius qualitatem nulla alia foret a qua pateretur animat; quod si ne­ que transmutari, neque pati quiret, quonam pacto dolerct ? Ostendens igitur hoc inpossibile esse, ex confesso inducit : Si autem doleret, undenam esset quod sanaret? Nunc autem non est unum quod sanat, sed multa; minime ergo ex uno elemento constituitur homo. Cæterum ex quibus ipsi conantur proprium quisque communire dogma, his maxime ostenditur quatuor esse elementa;
and not being changed, but remaining in itself, it would by no means feel pain, even if it were capable of sensation; but that which suffers must of necessity suffer from something. If therefore there were but one element, besides the quality of that element there would be no other from which a living thing might suffer; and if it could neither be changed nor suffer, in what way would it feel pain? Showing therefore that this is impossible, he draws his conclusion from what is admitted: But if it did feel pain, whence would come that which should heal? Now, however, it is not one thing that heals, but many; least of all, therefore, is a man constituted of one element. Moreover, from the very things by which each one tries to fortify his own dogma, it is most of all shown that the elements are four;
它既不改變,乃存於其自身,便斷不覺痛,縱使它有感覺之能;但凡受苦的,必然是從某物而受苦。所以若只有一種元素,那麼除了那元素的性質之外,便無別樣使活物可以從之受苦者;它若既不能改變,又不能受苦,又怎能覺痛呢?他便這樣顯明這是不可能的,再從所公認的得出結論:但它若覺痛,那使它痊愈的又從何而來?然而如今醫治的並非一物,乃是多物;所以人斷不是由單一元素所構成的。再者,就是從各人用以鞏固自己教條的那些事上,最能顯明元素乃是四種;
9:198
etenim Thales aquam solam dicens elementum, demonstrare nititur reliqua tria ab hac generari, nam hypostasim ejus terram fieri quod λεπτομερέστερον est, aerem, quod tenuius autem aere, ignem. Anaximenes vero aerem solum ponens, oslendere quoque tentat alia elementa ex aere pro­ duci. Heraclitus item et Hipparchus Ponticus ignem afferentes , iisdem demonstrationibus utuntui. Cum itaque et hi dicant ignem aliorum elementorum esse generativum, et iste similiter aerem, ille vero aquam, manifeste liquet quoniam omnia elementa vicissatim se transmutant, inque se invicem vertuntur, quod­ libet horum elementum esse nece sario consequitur.
for indeed Thales, calling water alone the element, strives to demonstrate that the other three are generated from it, for he says its sediment becomes earth which is finer-grained (leptomeresteron), air, and what is thinner than air, fire. But Anaximenes, positing air alone, also attempts to show that the other elements are produced from air. Heraclitus likewise, and Hipparchus of Pontus, bringing forward fire, use the same demonstrations. Since therefore both these say that fire is generative of the other elements, and that one likewise air, and the other water, it is plainly evident that all the elements are mutually transformed and turned into one another, and that any one of them follows of necessity to be an element.
因為泰勒斯既稱水為唯一元素,便力圖證明其餘三者都是從水而生,因他說水的沉澱化為土——較為精細者(leptomeresteron)化為氣,比氣更稀薄者化為火。但阿那克西米尼既設氣為唯一,也試圖顯明其餘元素是從氣所生。赫拉克利特同樣,並本都的希帕克斯,舉出火來,也用同樣的論證。既然這些人都說火生其餘元素,那一位同樣說氣,另一位說水,那麼顯然萬元素彼此互相遷變、互相轉化,並且其中任何一者都必然隨之而為一元素。
9:199
Quodcunque enim quatuor elementorum absumpseris, et hoc ab alio fieri comperietur. CAPUT XXV. Adversus eos qui audent asserere coæternam Deo esse materiam. Non enim juxta eorum quæ per consequentiam reperiuntur materiæ fertur opinio quae ex intelle­ ctuali hanc quoque sine materia existere pronuntiat. Omnem namque materiam quibusdam subsistere qualitatibus invenimus, quibus si privetur, nulla ra­ tione poterit comprehendi. Sed enim unaquæque qualitatis species subjecta ratione dividitur. Ratio autem intellectualis est, nec est ejus corporalis in­ specto :
For whichever of the four elements you take away, this too will be found to be made from another. CHAPTER XXV. Against those who dare to assert that matter is co-eternal with God. For the opinion is not borne out which, from the things found by way of consequence concerning matter, pronounces that this too, springing from the intellectual, exists without matter. For we find that all matter subsists by certain qualities, of which if it be deprived, it can by no reasoning be apprehended. But each species of quality is divided by an underlying principle. But the principle is intellectual, and there is no corporeal inspection of it:
因為四元素中無論你取走哪一個,這一個也要被發現是從另一個所造。第二十五章:駁那些膽敢斷言物質與神同永者。因為那種意見並不成立——它從關於物質按推論所尋得之事出發,宣稱物質既由理智之物而生,也是無物質而存在的。因為我們發現,一切物質都是憑某些性質而存的,它若被剝去這些性質,便無從以任何理路被把握。然而每一種性質之類,都是藉一個底層之理而被區分。而那理是屬理智的,並無對它的形體之察看:
9:200
ut puta sit in contemplatione nostra propo­ situm animal aliquod, vel lignum, vel quid aliud, quod materiali constitutione subsistit, multa de eodem sub­ jecto cogitationis discretione perpendimus, quorum singula quæ simul inspecta sunt, sine permixtione aliqua ratione et ordine continentur. Alia namque coloris est ratio, et alia ponderis, quantitatis. Item et qualitatis alia, et alia nihilominus tactus ; nam mol­ lities et bipedale et reliqua quæ dicta sunt, nequc sibi invicem, neque corpori ulla similitudinis ratione consentiunt. Singulis enim propria quædam ratio in­ terpres adjuncta est, nulli earum quæ in subjecto suo cernuntur qualitati communicans.
as, for example, suppose there is set before us in our contemplation some animal, or wood, or anything else which subsists by a material constitution, we weigh many things concerning that same subject by a discrimination of thought, each of which things, that are inspected together, are contained without any commingling, by reason and order. For the principle of color is one thing, and that of weight, of quantity, another. Likewise the principle of quality is one, and that of touch nonetheless another; for softness and the two-foot length and the rest of the things that have been mentioned agree with one another by no principle of likeness, nor with the body. For to each one a certain proper interpreting principle has been adjoined, communicating with none of those qualities which are discerned in its subject.
譬如說,假設在我們的默想中擺著某種動物、或木頭、或別樣憑物質構造而存之物,我們便藉思想的分辨,就那同一主體權衡許多事,這些一同被察看的事,每一樣都是藉理與序而毫無混雜地被含納。因為顏色之理是一樣,分量與分數之理又是一樣。同樣,性質之理是一樣,觸覺之理仍是另一樣;因為柔軟、二尺之長、以及其餘所提之事,彼此之間既不藉任何相似之理相合,與形體也不相合。因為各樣都附有某種專屬的解釋之理,與它主體中所察見的任何性質都不相通。
9:201
Si igitur in­ telligibilis quidem color, intelligibilis etiam figura, nec non et quantitas caeteraque hujusmodi proprie- tatum; horum vero singula si auferas a sabjecto, etiam ratio corporis tota dissolvitur : consequens est ut quorum absentiam resolutionis corporis causam esse cognoscimus, horum conventum atque concur­ sum perficere materialem naturam aestimare debea­ mus. Sicut enim corpus non est color aut figura, aut distantia aut pondus, aut reliqua proprietatum, cui­ cunque adsunt, ad horum singula, sicut diximus, cor­ pus esse non possunt, sed aliud quid practer corpus juxta suam proprietatem esse monstratur :
If therefore color is intelligible, and figure also intelligible, as too is quantity and the rest of such properties; but if you take away each of these from the subject, the whole principle of the body is likewise dissolved—it follows that, since we know the absence of these to be the cause of the body's dissolution, we ought to esteem their meeting and concurrence to perfect the material nature. For just as the body is not color, or figure, or distance, or weight, or the rest of the properties—to whatever it they belong—since, with respect to each of these, as we have said, they cannot be a body, but are shown to be something else besides body according to their own property:
那麼若顏色是可理解的,形狀也是可理解的,分數及其餘類此的特性也是如此;但你若從主體取走這些中的每一樣,形體的整個原理也就一同瓦解——由此可知,既然我們知道這些的缺席乃是形體瓦解之因,我們就當認為它們的會合與並集成就了物質之性。因為正如形體不是顏色、或形狀、或間距、或分量、或其餘的特性——無論這些屬於何物——既然如我們所說,就每一樣而論它們都不能是形體,乃顯為按其自身特性在形體之外的某物:
9:202
ita econ­ trario ubicunque memorata concurrunt, substantiam perficiunt corporalem. Etenim si intellectualis borum probatur inspectio, intellectualis autem divina natura est, nihil incongruens ex incorporea natura intelli­ gibili has occasiones ad corporalem generationem posse subsistere, cum intellectualis quidem natura intelligibiles potentias faciat, earum vero conventus in invicem materialem naturam ac generationem consequenter educat. Sed hæc in transcursu discussa sunt. Nobis autem rursus ad fidem ratio tota referenda est, per quam ex non exstantibus omnia substituta esse didicimus, et rursus in alium quemdam transmutanda statum Scripturis venerabilibus edocti minime dubi­ tamus.
so on the contrary, wherever the aforesaid things concur, they perfect a corporeal substance. And indeed, if the inspection of these is proved to be intellectual, and the divine nature is intellectual, there is nothing incongruous in that these occasions for corporeal generation can subsist from the incorporeal intelligible nature—since the intellectual nature indeed makes intelligible powers, and the concurrence of these into one another consequently brings forth material nature and generation. But these things have been discussed in passing. We, however, must again refer the whole argument to faith, by which we have learned that all things were established out of things non-existent, and again that they are to be changed into a certain other state, being taught by the venerable Scriptures, we by no means doubt.
反過來,凡上述諸事會合之處,它們便成就一個形體的本質。誠然,這些事的察看若被證明是屬理智的,而神性也是屬理智的,那麼這些形體受生之機緣,能從那不可見、屬理智之性而存,便毫無不相宜之處——因為理智之性固然生出可理解的能力,而這些能力的彼此會合便隨之引出物質之性與受生。然而這些事不過是順帶討論的。我們卻必須再把整個論證歸於信德,我們既藉信德學得萬物都是從無造成,又從可敬的聖經受教而知萬物要被改變入某種別的狀態,便斷不懷疑。
9:203
CAPUT XXVI. Quemadmodum quis etiam ab his qui foris sunt ad­ ducatur, ut Scripturæ docenti de resurrectione debeat credere. Sed forte quispiam corpora jam soluta conspiciens, et pro modo suarum virium divinam perpendens ra­ tionem. resolutionem impossibilem esse fateatur et stare quae moventur, imo et surgere quae modo non moventur, fieri non posse pronuntiet. Sed quicunque est ille primum quidem et maximum de resurrectione veritatis accipiat argumentum, quod prædicator ejus probetur omni fide dignissimus, eorum vero quæ dicuntur fides ex his quæ prædicta ac completa sunt suam rctinet firmitatem.
CHAPTER XXVI. In what manner one may be led, even by those who are without, to believe the Scripture teaching concerning the resurrection. But perhaps someone, beholding bodies already dissolved, and weighing the divine reason according to the measure of his own powers, may declare the dissolution impossible, and pronounce that it cannot be that the things which are moved should stand, nay rather that the things which are now not moved should rise. But whoever he is, let him first receive the chief and greatest argument concerning the truth of the resurrection—that its preacher is proved most worthy of all faith, and that the faith of the things which are said retains its firmness from those things which have been foretold and fulfilled.
第二十六章:人如何能被那些在外之人所引導,以致應當相信聖經論復活的教導。但或許有人,看見形體已經瓦解,並按自己能力的尺度衡量神的道理,就要宣稱這瓦解是不可能的,並斷言被推動之物不能站立,更不能說那些如今不被推動的反倒會起來。但他無論是誰,先要領受那關於復活之真理最首要、最重大的論據——就是它的傳講者被證為最配得一切信任的,而所傳之事的可信,乃從那些已被預言並已應驗的事保有其確據。
9:204
Quia vero plures nobis di­ versosque sermones divinae Scriptune commendavit auctoritas, facile reor utrum falsa an vera sint ea quae dicta sunt ex his quæ jam completa sunt explo­ rare, et per illa hoc quoque dogma resurrectionis inspicere. Nam si in aliis rebus falsi sermones et pro­ cui a veritate monstrantur, nec hoc extra mendacium esse cognoscitur. Si vero caetera omnia vera, expe­ rientia ipsa testante, consequens est per ista veram prædicationem resurrectionis existere. Quapropter unius vel duorum de his quæ sunt prædicta memore­ mns, simulque eorum proferamus eventum, quatenus agnoscere possimus utrum vcritali oratio nostra re­ spondeat.
But since the authority of the divine Scripture has committed to us many and diverse discourses, I think it easy to explore, from those things which are now fulfilled, whether the things that have been said are false or true, and through them to inspect this dogma also of the resurrection. For if in other matters the discourses are shown to be false and far from the truth, this one too is not known to be free from falsehood. But if all the rest are true, with experience itself bearing witness, it follows that through these the preaching of the resurrection truly exists. Wherefore let us call to mind one or two of the things that have been foretold, and at the same time set forth their outcome, so far as we may be able to recognize whether our discourse answers to the truth.
但既然神聖經的權柄已將許多並各樣的論述交託與我們,我想從那些如今已應驗的事,去探究所說的話究竟是假是真,並藉這些去察看這復活的教義,乃是容易的。因為在別的事上若那些論述被顯為虛假、遠離真理,那麼這一件也就不能被認為脫離虛謊。但若其餘一切都是真的,並有經驗本身為證,那麼隨之可知,藉這些事,復活的宣講確實成立。因此讓我們回想一兩件已被預言的事,同時陳明它們的結局,好叫我們能認出我們的論述是否與真理相符。
9:205
Quis igitur ignoret qualiter antiquitus flo­ ruerit Israeliticus populus, omnibus se propemodum mundi potestatibus efferens, qualia eorum regna erant in urbe Hierosolyma quales muri vel turres, templi quoque quanta magnificentia, ut etiam discipulis Christi viderentur miraculo, ipsumque Dominum precarentur attendere. Sicque erant ex his quæ cer­ nebant stupore admirationis affecli, ut sancti Evan­ gelii declarat historia, dicentes : Qualia opera, qua­ lesque essent ædificationes' Dominus autem futuram loci desertionem et pulchritudinis illius exterminium, his qui in præsentiarum nimis admirabantur insinuat, nihil eorum quæ videbantur post paulum dicens esse mansurum.
Who then is ignorant how of old the Israelite people flourished, exalting themselves above almost all the powers of the world—what their kingdoms were in the city of Jerusalem, what their walls or towers, what too the great magnificence of the temple, so that it seemed even to the disciples of Christ a marvel, and they besought the Lord himself to give heed to it? And so they were affected with the amazement of admiration at the things they beheld, as the history of the holy Gospel declares, saying: What works, and what manner of buildings were these! But the Lord intimates to those who at the present were exceedingly admiring it the future desolation of the place and the destruction of that beauty, saying that nothing of the things which were seen would remain after a little while.
那麼誰不曉得,以色列民古時何等興盛,幾乎高舉自己過於世上一切的權勢——他們的諸國在耶路撒冷城中何等,他們的城牆與樓臺何等,聖殿又何等宏偉,以致連基督的門徒看了也以為奇,並求主自己留意觀看?他們對所看見的事如此驚奇讚歎,正如聖福音的記事所宣明,說:這是何等的工程,何等的建造!但主向那些當時極其驚歎之人,預示那地將來的荒涼與那華美的毀滅,說所看見的這一切,過不多時必沒有一樣存留。
9:206
Sed et tempore passionis, cum eum mu­ lte. es sequerentur plangentes atque lamentantes quod damnatus esset iniqua sententia (necdum enim dispensationem eorum quae gerebantur intelligere poterant), consilium præbuit, et pro his quae circa se flebant quiescerent, quia lacrymis digna non essent, differrent autem lamentationes vel planctus in tem­ pu- illud quo veras exprimerent, cum civitas eorum premeretur ab obsidentibus, et in hoc angustiarum et calamitatis venirent, ut beatum tunc qui non esset natus eo tempore testarent. In quibus etiam scelus illud, quod suos pro fame filios vorarcut, pronuntiavit verbis dicens in diebus illis sterilem quæ non pareret esse felicem.
But also at the time of his passion, when many women followed him bewailing and lamenting that he had been condemned by an unjust sentence (for they could not yet understand the dispensation of the things that were being done), he gave them counsel, that they should cease from the things they wept over concerning him, because these were not worthy of tears, but should defer their lamentations and mournings to that time in which they would express true ones—when their city should be pressed by besiegers, and they should come into such straits of distress and calamity that they would then call blessed the one who had not been born at that time. Among which things also he foretold that crime by which they would devour their own children for hunger, saying in these words that in those days the barren woman who bore not would be happy.
並且在受難之時,有許多婦女跟著他,為他被不義的判決定罪而捶胸哀哭(因為她們還不能明白那所行之事的安排),他便勸告她們,叫她們不要為自己身上所臨的哭泣,因為這些不值得流淚,倒要把哀哭與捶胸延至那時候,那時她們要發出真正的哀號——就是她們的城被圍困的人所逼,陷入這等的患難與災禍之時,以致她們那時要稱那未曾在此時生的為有福。其中他也預言了那罪惡,就是他們要因饑荒吞吃自己的兒女,他用這話說,當那些日子,不生育、未曾懷胎的婦人是有福的。
9:207
Ubi igitur illud regnum, ubi templum, ubi murorum et turrium celsitudo, ubi Israelitarum illa potentia? Nonne illi quidem per omnes fere terras alius alibi videntur esse dispersi, et cum eorum sub­ versione regnum quoque est destructum? Videtur autem mihi haec et horum similia Dominus non ipsa­ rum rerum gratia ante dixisse, (quid enim lucri au­ ditoribus afferret corum quae erant eventura cognitio, quæ etsi ante nescirent experientia ipsa cognosce rent?) sed ut per hæc nunc de rebus maximis Uides consequenter haberetur. Nam testificatio quæ in istis operibus constat, in illis quoque veritatis esse pro­ batur ostensio.
Where then is that kingdom, where the temple, where the loftiness of walls and towers, where that power of the Israelites? Are they not indeed seen to be scattered, one here, another there, through nearly all lands, and with their subversion is the kingdom too destroyed? But it seems to me that the Lord foretold these and like things not for the sake of the things themselves (for what gain would the foreknowledge of the things that were to come bring to the hearers, things which, even if they had not known them beforehand, they would have learned by experience itself?), but that through these there might now consequently be held a faith concerning the greatest matters. For the testimony which stands in these works is proved to be in those others also a demonstration of the truth.
那麼那國今在何處,聖殿在何處,城牆與樓臺的高聳在何處,以色列人那權勢在何處?他們豈不正是被四散,這個在這裡、那個在那裡,遍及幾乎一切地方,並且隨他們的傾覆,那國也被毀滅了麼?但我看,主預言這些及類此之事,並非為著那些事本身(因為對聽者而言,預知那將來必臨的事有何益處呢?那些事縱然他們先前不知道,也必藉經驗本身得知);乃是要藉這些事,叫如今能隨之對那最重大的事持有信德。因為在這些工作上所立的見證,被證明在那其餘的事上也是真理的明證。
9:208
Quemadmodum si quis agricola virn seminum inexperlo referens, ab eo minime credatur, sunicit ei ad probationem veritatis in uno seminis grano eorum demonstrare potentiam, ut de reliquis ejus firma probetur asserlio; qui enim viderit unum granum, ut pula tritici, aut hordei, aut alicujus cæterorum quae in medicinæ mensura esse conti­ gerit, posteaquam depositum fuerit terræ visceribus, in spicam surgere, ex hoc uno jam de cæteris dubi­ tare non poterit, ita mihi de mysterio resurrectionis testimonium videtur idoneum ipsa veritas prædicta et completa factorum, seu potius ipsius jam resurre­ ctionis experientia, quam non tam verbis quam rebus instructi percepimus.
Just as, if some farmer, relating the power of seeds to an inexperienced man, should be by no means believed by him, it suffices him, for the proof of the truth, to demonstrate in one grain of seed the power of them all, so that concerning the rest his assertion may be firmly proved; for whoever has seen one grain—of wheat, say, or barley, or any of the others that happen to be of a medicinal measure—after it has been deposited in the bowels of the earth, rise up into an ear, can no longer doubt from this one concerning the rest: so to me, concerning the mystery of the resurrection, the very truth foretold and fulfilled by deeds seems a fitting testimony, or rather the experience of the resurrection itself already, which we have perceived, instructed not so much by words as by deeds.
正如,若有農夫向無經驗之人述說種子的能力,那人卻斷不信他,那麼為證明真理,他只需在一粒種子中顯明眾種子的能力,便足夠了,好叫他關於其餘的論斷得以堅固證實;因為凡看見一粒種子——譬如麥子、或大麥、或其餘任何按藥用之量者——被埋入地的腹中之後,長成一穗的,便再不能因這一粒而懷疑其餘:照樣,論到復活的奧祕,在我看來,那已被預言並已藉事實成就的真理本身,乃是合宜的見證,或不如說是那已然復活本身的經驗,這是我們所領受的,並非單藉言語、乃藉事實所教導的。
9:209
Nam quoniam magnum aliquid et supra fidem erat de resurreclione miraculum, Dominus ab inferiore signo virtutis incipiens, paula­ tim fidem nostram ad celsiora quibusdam processi­ bus assuescit. Sicut enim quædam mater competen- ter parvulum lactans interim aes ubera teneris immulget, ast ubi producere dentes coeperit, offert ei panem, non, sicut est, durum aut rigidum, ne ibi soliditas exasperet mollitiem gingivarum, sed man­ dens propriis dentibus mordificat, et viribus parvuli cibum præparat congruentem, deinde juxta profectus ætatis ei qui erat mollioribus assuetus escas præpa­ rat fortiores ;
For since the miracle concerning the resurrection was something great and beyond belief, the Lord, beginning from a lower sign of his power, gradually accustoms our faith to higher things by certain stages. For just as a certain mother, suitably nursing her little child, for a while pours milk into it through her breasts for its tender mouth, but when it begins to put forth teeth, offers it bread—not, as it is, hard or stiff, lest its solidity there roughen the softness of the gums, but, chewing it with her own teeth, softens it and prepares food suited to the strength of the little one; then, according to the advancement of its age, prepares stronger foods for one accustomed to softer ones:
因為論到復活的神蹟,乃是某種偉大、超乎信念之事,主便從他能力的較低記號開始,藉某些步驟漸漸使我們的信習於更崇高之事。因為正如某位母親相宜地哺養她的幼兒,先暫且藉乳房將奶倒入它柔嫩的口;但當它開始長牙時,便給它麵包——不是照原樣堅硬或剛硬的,免得那硬度在那裡粗糙了牙床的柔軟,乃是用自己的牙嚼軟,預備合乎幼兒之力的食物;然後按它年歲的進長,為那習於較軟食物者預備更強壯的食物:
9:210
sic humanam pusillitatem Dominus velut imperfectam infantiam tantis alendo miraculis atque regendo per eam quæ desperata decumbebat ægritudine, ei virtutem resurrectionis informat, quae res ad consummandum erat quidem miserabilis, sed non talis ut minime fieri posse crederetur. Imperans enim febri quae fortiter socrum Simonis exurebat, tantam mali causam sic e vestigio transtulit, ut sine mora consurgens ministerium posset exhibere præ­ sentibus, quae sperabatur protinus esse moritura. Post hæc parumper virtutis adjiciens, reguli filium languentem sub professo periculo sanavit. Sic enim narrat evangelica historia : Incipiebat enim mori, pa­ tre vociferante ac dicente :
so the Lord, nourishing human littleness as though imperfect infancy with such great miracles, and governing it through the very sickness which lay despaired of in its bed, forms in it the power of the resurrection—a thing which, for its consummation, was indeed pitiable, but not such that it should be believed impossible to come to pass. For commanding the fever which was strongly burning Simon's mother-in-law, he so on the instant removed so great a cause of the malady, that without delay she rose up and was able to render service to those present, she who was looked for forthwith to die. After this, adding a little of his power, he healed the ruler's son, who was languishing under manifest peril. For thus the evangelical history relates: For he was beginning to die, the father crying out and saying:
照樣,主以這等大神蹟哺養人的微弱,如同哺養不全的嬰孩,並藉那臥在絕望病榻中的疾病管理它,在它裡面塑成復活的能力——這事就其成全而言誠然可憐,卻不是那種當被信為不能發生的。因為他吩咐那猛烈燒著西門岳母的熱病,便如此立刻除去那病的大根因,以致她毫不耽延地起來,能服事在座的人,她原是立刻就被料想要死的。此後,他略加他的能力,醫好那臨於明顯危險中、衰弱垂死的大臣之子。因為福音的記事如此述說:那孩子快要死了,父親喊著說:
9:211
Descende, Domine, prius­ quam moriatur puer; operator item resurrectionis ejus qui credebatur esse moriturus miraculum potentia præstantiore perficiens, ut nec veniret ad locum, sed eminus custoditus vitam puero præcepti virtute trans- mitteret; deinde nos consequenter erudiens, ad virtu­ tum sublimiora perducit. Nam ad filiam principis sponte perveniens occasiones itineris præstitit, ut et sanitas ejus quæ laborabat profluvio sanguinis vulga­ retur, et tanta mora temporis mors prævaleret ægro- tanti, sed nunc anima separata de corpore, turbatis­ que clamoribus luctuosis his qui casum planctibus efferebant, veluti e somno puellam imperativo ser­ mone resuscitavil ad vitam.
Come down, Lord, before the boy dies; and likewise working the miracle of the resurrection of him who was believed to be about to die, accomplishing it with a more excellent power, so that he neither came to the place, but, watching from afar, transmitted life to the boy by the power of his command; then, instructing us consequently, he leads us on to the higher things of his virtues. For coming of his own accord to the ruler's daughter, he afforded occasions of the journey, that both the healing of her who labored under an issue of blood might be made known, and that by so great a delay of time death might prevail over the sick girl—but now, the soul being separated from the body, and amid the troubled and mournful cries of those who were extolling the calamity with lamentations, he, as though from sleep, by an imperative word raised the girl to life.
主啊,求你趁我孩子未死之先下去;他也照樣行那被認為快要死之人復活的神蹟,以更卓越的能力成就,以致他並未到那地方,乃從遠處看顧,藉他命令的能力把生命傳給那孩子;然後他隨之教導我們,引我們進到他德能更崇高之事。因為他甘心親自前往那長官的女兒那裡,便為這行程預備機緣,叫那患血漏之婦女的得醫被人知曉,又叫死亡因時候這樣的耽延而勝過那病重的女孩——但如今,靈魂既與身體分離,並在那些以哀號高聲傳揚這災禍之人擾攘悲傷的喊聲中,他便彷彿從睡中,藉一句命令的話,把那女孩喚起復生。
9:212
Via quadam et conse­ quentia fragilitatem humanam ad majora sustollens, rurs s hæc quoque miracula solita virtute transcen­ dens celsiore potentia, iter facit hominibus quo fidem resurrectionis admitterent. Civitatem quamdam Naim nomine in Judxa esse sacra Scriptura commemorat. In hac fuit viduæ cujusdam unicus filius puer, non puer talis qui computaretur in parvulis, sed ex pue­ ritia in juventutem jani jamque profeccrat. Unde et juvenem illum sermo coelestis appellat, plura paucis insinuans. Lamentatio magna est ipsa relatio : Erat, inquit, vidua mater defuncti. Perspicis pondus cala- mitatis, quomodo passionem brevitcr extulit. Quid enim est quod dicitur?
By a certain way and consequence raising human frailty toward greater things, and again transcending these miracles too with his accustomed power by a loftier might, he makes a way for men whereby they might admit the faith of the resurrection. Holy Scripture records that there is a certain city named Nain in Judea. In it was the only son of a certain widow, a boy—not such a boy as would be reckoned among little ones, but one who had now from boyhood already advanced into youth. Whence the heavenly word calls him a young man, intimating much in few words. The very account is a great lamentation: There was, it says, a widow, the mother of the deceased. You perceive the weight of the calamity, how briefly it set forth the suffering. For what is it that is said?
主以某種途徑與後續,把人的脆弱舉向更大之事,又以更崇高的權能,憑他慣常的大能甚至超越這些神蹟,為人開了一條路,使他們可以接受復活的信。聖經記載,在猶太有一座城名叫拿因。城裡有一個寡婦的獨生子,是個孩子——不是那種算在幼童中的孩子,乃是已從童年進到青年的。所以那屬天的話稱他為少年人,以寥寥數語暗示甚多。這記事本身就是一大哀號:經上說,有一個寡婦,是這死者的母親。你便看出這災禍的分量,看它何等簡短地陳明了那苦痛。因為所說的是甚麼呢?
9:213
Quia non erat etiam spes ulla qua posset filios recreare, tanteque levamen orbita­ tis assumere. Vidua quippe erat, nec habebat alterum quem pro defuncto conspiceret. Nam partus ei exsti­ terat singularis. Quantum vero hoc malum sit, facile omnes intelligunt, qui Daturæ jura cognoscunt. Solum hunc in doloribus noverat, solum suis lactaverat uberihus, solus illustrabat ejus convivium, totiusque doloris, solus erat causa lætitiæ, cum luderet aut ali­ quid ageret, cum institueretur aut ornaretur, cum coævis in processionibus, in palæstris, in conventibus jungeretur, omne quidquid matris oculis dulce pre­ tiosumque suberat, solus unicus offerebat.
That there was no longer any hope by which she could be restored with children, and assume so great a solace for her bereavement. For she was a widow, and had no other whom she might behold in place of the deceased. For her childbearing had been single. But how great this evil is, all easily understand who know the laws of nature. Him alone she had known in her travails, him alone she had suckled at her breasts, he alone made her feast bright; and of all her grief he alone was the cause of gladness, when he played or did anything, when he was being instructed or adorned, when he was joined with his coevals in processions, in wrestling-schools, in assemblies—whatever was sweet and precious before a mother's eyes, he, the only one, the sole, presented.
就是說,再無任何盼望可使她得兒女而復興,並承受她喪子之痛這等的安慰。因為她是寡婦,再無別人可代那死者觀看。因為她的生育是獨一的。然而這禍患何等之大,凡曉得自然之律的人都容易明白。她在生產的劬勞中惟認得他,惟用乳房哺養他,惟他使她的筵席明亮;在她一切的憂傷中,惟他是喜樂之因——當他玩耍或做甚麼事時,當他受教或裝飾時,當他在遊行、在角力場、在聚會中與同齡人相聚時——凡在母親眼前甘甜寶貴的,惟他這獨一的、這唯一的兒子獻上。
9:214
lamque nuptiale tempus advenerat, stirps videbatur generis, ramusculus successionis, baculus senectutis et ætatis incrementum. Erat et altera lamentationis occasio. Qui enim juvenem retulit florem simul qui marcuerat indicavit, cujus adhuc vultus lanugine vestiretur, et genarum decor grato fulgore nitesceret. Quid igitur super ejus obitu mater pertulit, quanto viscera ejus igne perusta sunt? Quam copiosissimas et amarissi­ mas super eum lacrymas fudit ? Tabescens quodam­ modo et cadaver ejus amplectens, ne properaretur sepultura ejus, tantoque casu satiari desiderans, diu longas in fletu voces emittere cupiebat, ita ut omnes audientes moveret ad luctum.
And now the time of marriage had arrived; he seemed the stock of the family, the little branch of the succession, the staff of old age and the increase of her years. There was yet another occasion for lamentation. For he who recounted the young man at the same time indicated the flower that had withered—whose face was still clothed with down, and the comeliness of whose cheeks shone with a pleasing radiance. What then did the mother bear over his death; with how great a fire were her bowels burned? How copious and most bitter the tears she shed over him? Wasting away in a manner and embracing his corpse, that his burial might not be hastened, and desiring to be satisfied with so great a calamity, she longed to send forth long voices in weeping at length, so that she moved all who heard to mourning.
如今婚娶的時候已到;他彷彿是家族的本根、繼承的嫩枝、老年的扶杖、她年歲的增添。然而還有另一樁哀號的緣由。因為那敘述這少年的,同時也指明那已凋謝的花——他的臉上還生著茸毛,他兩腮的秀美煥發著可愛的光輝。那麼母親為他的死忍受了甚麼,她的肺腑被何等的火燒灼?她為他流下何等豐沛、何等苦澀的淚?她彷彿一面消瘦,一面抱著他的屍身,不容他的葬禮被催促,渴望以這等的災禍得滿足,極願在哀哭中長久發出綿長的聲音,以致她使一切聽見的人都動了哀傷。
9:215
Nec hoc praetermisit enim sancta relatio. Videns, inquit, eam Dominus, misericordia motus est, et accedens tetigit loculum ; qui autem portabant steterunt; et dixit defuncto : Ado- lescens, tibi dico, Surge, et protinus eum viventem matri instituit, nunc non in parva mora atque distan­ tia, quamvis nondum sepulti, tamen sepulturæ vicini, vita Domino resurrectio mortui, equidem miraculum majus, sed aequale prorsus imperium. Adhuc autem magnificentius promuntur signa virtutum, ut magis ac magis propinquetur illi rei qua videtur de mor­ tuorum resurrectione dubitari.
Nor did the holy account pass this over. Seeing her, it says, the Lord was moved with compassion, and approaching he touched the bier; and those who bore it stood still; and he said to the dead man: Young man, I say to you, Arise—and forthwith he restored him living to his mother, now not after a small delay and distance, although not yet buried, yet near to burial; life from the Lord, resurrection of the dead—indeed a greater miracle, but altogether an equal command. But still more magnificently are the signs of his powers brought forth, that one may more and more approach that matter wherein the resurrection of the dead seems to be doubted.
聖經的記事也沒有略過這事。經上說,主看見那婦人就動了慈心,上前按著棺架;抬的人就站住了;他便對那死人說:少年人,我吩咐你,起來——他便立時把他活活地交還他母親;如今不是過了小小的耽延與距離,雖尚未埋葬,卻已近於埋葬;生命從主而出,死人復活——這固然是更大的神蹟,但全然是同等的命令。然而他德能的記號還要更宏偉地施展出來,好叫人愈發親近那似乎被人懷疑的、死人復活之事。
9:216
Infirmatur quis de familiaribus Christi nomine Lazarus, quem Dominus quamvis amicum idcirco distulit visitare, et ab ægro­ tante procul abfuit, ut, absente vita, mors aditum re­ periret, et per infirmitatem quod suum erat efficeret. Indicat discipulis quid in Galilæa contigerat Lazaro, et quod illuc sibi properandum esset, ut eum susci­ taret a mortuis. Illi vera propter Judæorum sævitiam memorata loca declinabant, exitiale ac periculosum putantes rursus in Judæam pergere, et inter homici. das impiosque versari, et ideo remorantes atque dif­ ferentes, ne ibidem reverterentur tempora protruhe­ bant.
One of the intimates of Christ, named Lazarus, falls sick, whom the Lord, although a friend, on that account delayed to visit, and kept far from the sick man, so that, life being absent, death might find entry and through the infirmity might accomplish what was its own. He indicates to the disciples what had befallen Lazarus in Galilee, and that he must hasten thither to raise him from the dead. But they, on account of the savagery of the Jews, shunned the places mentioned, deeming it deadly and perilous to go again into Judea, and to be among murderers and the impious; and therefore, lingering and deferring, they prolonged the time, lest they should return thither.
基督的密友中有一個名叫拉撒路的患了病,主雖是他的朋友,卻為此故意延遲不去探望,且遠離那病人,好叫生命既缺,死亡可以得入,並藉那病成就那屬死亡之事。他向門徒指明拉撒路在加利利所遭遇的,並說他必須急速前往那裡,要叫他從死裡復活。但門徒因猶太人的兇暴,便躲避所提的那些地方,以為再進猶太、置身於兇手與不敬虔者之間,乃是致命而危險的;因此他們遲延推託,拖延時候,免得回到那裡去。
9:217
Obtinuit imperium Domini, eoque proficiscente discipuli subsequuntur, ut in Bethania primitias uni­ versalis quodammodo resurrectionis inspicerent. Quartus erat jam sepulto dies, cunctaque videbantur erga busta pe:soluta; constabat corpus in monumento depositum, et, quod erat consequens, jam timore dis­ tentum corruptionis interitu solvebatur. Sanies enim in terram ipsa necessitate defluebat, fugienda procul dubio res, cogente natura, id quod resolutum fuerat fetor teterrimus exbalabat. Hoc autem factum est ut generalis resurrectionis opus, quod ab infid libus minus creditur, manifesti miraculi ostensione pro­ barclur.
The Lord's command prevailed, and as he set out the disciples followed, that in Bethany they might behold the first-fruits, as it were, of the universal resurrection. It was now the fourth day since the burial, and all things seemed to have been paid over to the tomb; it was established that the body, deposited in the monument, and, as was consequent, now distended with the dread of corruption, was being dissolved by the destruction of decay. For the putrid matter flowed down into the earth by very necessity, a thing assuredly to be fled, and, nature compelling, that which had been dissolved exhaled a most foul stench. But this happened so that the work of the general resurrection, which is too little believed by the faithless, might be proved by the demonstration of a manifest miracle.
主的命令得勝,他既起行,門徒便跟隨,好叫他們在伯大尼彷彿看見那普世復活的初熟果子。如今離埋葬已是第四日,凡事都彷彿已交付墳墓;那放在墳塋中的身體既已確定,並如所當然地脹滿了腐敗的可怖,正被朽壞的毀滅所瓦解。因為那膿水出於極大的必然流入地中,這事確是當逃避的;而自然既逼迫,那已瓦解之物便發出極其惡臭。然而這事如此發生,乃是要叫那普世復活之工——就是不信者太少相信的——藉一個明顯神蹟的彰顯得以證實。
9:218
Non enim quis elevatur ex ægritudine, nec in extremis locatus retinetur in vita, nec parvula nuper mortua suscitata, nec monumento proximus ju­ venis suum ferelrum dcserit, sed vir primatus pu- Ire cens atque diffluens, ita ut nec sororihus ejus esset tolerabile ut Dominus propinquaret monu­ mento, propter insitam molestiam jam resoluto ca­ davere: una tamen voce vivificatus, fidem facit præ­ dicalori, quae spem resurrectionis anirmat. Hoc est quod de universis in commune credamus, quod in partibus experientia ipsa didicimus.
For it is not someone lifted up out of sickness, nor one placed in extremity retained in life, nor a little girl lately dead raised up, nor a youth near the monument deserting his own bier, but a man of the first rank, putrefying and flowing apart, so that it was not even tolerable to his sisters that the Lord should draw near the monument, on account of the implanted offensiveness of the corpse now dissolved: yet by one voice he was made alive, and gives faith to the preacher, which confirms the hope of the resurrection. This is what we believe in common concerning all, which we have learned in particular by experience itself.
因為這不是某個從病中被舉起的人,也不是某個臨終卻被存留在生命中的人,也不是某個方才死去而被喚起的小女孩,也不是某個近墳塋而離棄自己棺架的少年;乃是一個首要之人,已腐爛流散,以致連他的姊妹也不能容忍主走近那墳塋,因那已瓦解屍身固有的可厭:然而藉一句話他就活了,並使那傳講者得著信實,這信實堅固了復活的盼望。這就是我們所共信、關乎眾人的事,乃是我們從個別事上藉經驗本身所學得的。
9:219
Sicut enim uni­ versali resurrectione dicitApostolus ipsum Dominum de coelo descendere in jussu et in voce archangeli et in tuba Dei, ut ad incorruptibilitatem mortuos excitet, ita et nunc mortem veluti somnum quemdam imperio dominicæ vocis, is qui erat in monumento discutiens, et corruptionem quae de morte provenerat a se longe secludens, integer atque perfectus exilit de sepulcro, nec ipsis vinculis quibus erat astrictus ad gradien­ dum omnino prohibitus. Parva haec æstimas ad fa­ ciendam fidem quod resurrectionem fore credimus mortuorum ? An quaeris et ex aliis hanc tibi firmari deberi sententiam ? Non mihi videtur frustra his qui erant Capharnaum veluti ex persona eorum dixisse Dominum :
For just as, at the universal resurrection, the Apostle says that the Lord himself descends from heaven with a command and with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, to raise the dead to incorruptibility, so now too, dispelling death like a kind of sleep by the command of the dominical voice, he who was in the monument, and shutting far away from himself the corruption that had come from death, leaps forth whole and perfect from the sepulcher, not at all hindered from walking even by the very bands with which he had been bound. Do you esteem these things small for making faith that we believe the resurrection of the dead is to be? Or do you seek that this opinion be confirmed to you from other things also? It seems to me not in vain that the Lord said to those who were of Capernaum, as though in their person:
因為正如使徒所說,在那普世復活之時,主自己要帶著命令、帶著天使長的聲音、帶著神的號筒,從天降臨,要叫死人復活進入不朽壞;照樣如今,他也藉主聲音的命令,把死亡如同某種睡眠驅散,使那在墳塋中的人,並把那從死而來的朽壞遠遠關在自己之外,完整而全備地從墳墓躍出,連那捆綁他的布條也絲毫不能攔阻他行走。你以為這些事對於使人相信我們所信死人必要復活,乃是小事麼?還是你尋求叫這意見也從別的事上向你得著證實?我看主對那些迦百農人所說的話並非徒然,彷彿是以他們的口吻說的:
9:220
Utique dicitis mihi hanc parabolam : Me­ dice, cura leipsum. Oportebat enim, ut quod in alio­ rum corporibus fecerat resurrectionis miraculum, innotescens in se ipso juxta id quod homo esse di­ gnatus est, approbaret, multis sperum modis præ i- cationem suam eliam propria morte confirmans. Vi­ disti puellam nuper vivere desinentem, juvenem quo­ que propinquantem sepulcro , nec non et Lazarum pene resolutum, omnes aequaliter ad vilarn una jus­ sione vocali sunt; queris et eos qui ad mortem per sanguinem et vulnera pervenerunt, ne quis forsitan in hoc defectus sit, quominus gratia cuncta vivili an­ tis appareat.
Surely you will say to me this parable: 'Physician, heal yourself.' For it was fitting that the miracle of resurrection which He had wrought in the bodies of others He should also approve, manifested in His very self, according to that whereby He deigned to be man, confirming His preaching by His own death as well, in many trustworthy ways. You have seen a girl but lately ceasing to live, a young man too drawing near the tomb, and likewise Lazarus all but dissolved; all alike were summoned back to life by a single spoken command. You seek also those who have come to death through blood and wounds, lest perhaps in this some failing be found, whereby the grace of the Giver of life should not appear in all things.
你們必對我說這比喻:「醫生,治好你自己吧。」因為祂在別人身上所行的復活神蹟,理當也在祂自己身上得到證實,照著祂甘願成為人的那一面顯明出來,並以自己的死,藉著許多可信的方式來印證祂的宣講。你曾看見一個女孩剛剛斷氣,又有一個少年將近墳墓,還有那幾乎已腐朽的拉撒路;他們都同樣藉著一聲口頭的命令被召回生命。你也要尋問那些藉著流血與創傷而至於死的人,免得在這事上或有任何缺欠,以致賜生命者的恩典不得在萬事上顯明。
9:221
Cerne clavis Domini manus esse trans - fixas, cerne latus cuspide perforatum, circumfer ni­ gitos tuos per aperturas clavorum, mitte manum in vulnus quod ex lancea constat effectum; conjicis forte quantum ad interiora cuspidis acumen penetrare potuerit ex latitudine cicatricis ejus; libet metiaris ingressum, plaga etenim ipsa impulsu virilis manus effecta, quantum in altum descenderit, ostendit evi- denter. Si igitur sic affectus resurrexit a mortuis, opportune illud Apostoli proferimus: Quomodo quidam dicunt in vobis quia resurrectio mortuorum non est ?
Behold the hands of the Lord pierced through with nails; behold the side bored through with the spear-point; pass your fingers over the openings of the nails; put your hand into the wound that was made by the lance. You may perhaps reckon how far the sharpness of the point could penetrate to the inner parts from the breadth of its scar; you may, if you please, measure the entry, for the very wound, made by the thrust of a man's hand, shows clearly how deep it descended. If therefore, thus afflicted, He rose from the dead, opportunely do we bring forth that saying of the Apostle: 'How do some say among you that there is no resurrection of the dead?'
你看那主的雙手被釘子貫穿;你看那肋旁被槍尖刺透;用你的指頭探過那釘痕的孔,把你的手伸進那長槍所造成的傷口;你或可從疤痕的寬度推算槍尖能刺入內裡有多深;你若願意,可以量度那入口,因為那傷口本身既是人手用力刺成的,便清楚顯出它下到了何等深處。所以,祂既如此受苦而從死裡復活,我們便正合時宜地引述使徒的話:「怎麼在你們中間有人說沒有死人復活的事呢?」
9:222
Quia igitur pronuntiatio omnis Domini vera monstra­ tur ipsa testificatione factorum, id enim non tantum verbo didicimus, sed opere ipso manifestam promis­ sionis ejus spem per eos qui jam ad vitam de resur- recitone venerunt nos accepisse gloriamur, quæ jam incredulis ulla remanebit occasio ? Nonne renuntian­ tes bis qui per philosophiam et inanem fallaciam despicere simplicitatem fidei moliuntur, purissimam confessionem spei nostrae retinebimus in parvo, di­ centes ad prophetæ modum gratiæ ip6ius, cum dicit ad Dominum : Auferet spiritum ipsorum el deficient, et in pulverem suum revertentur;
Since therefore every pronouncement of the Lord is shown to be true by the very testimony of the facts—for this we have learned not by word only, but by the very deed we glory to have received a manifest hope of His promise through those who have already come to life from the resurrection—what occasion will any longer remain to the unbelieving? Shall we not, renouncing those who through philosophy and vain deceit strive to despise the simplicity of faith, hold fast in our littleness the purest confession of our hope, saying after the manner of the prophet of that same grace, when he says to the Lord: 'Thou shalt take away their spirit, and they shall fail, and shall return to their dust';
既然主的每一句宣告都藉著事實本身的見證顯為真實——因為這我們不僅憑言語學得,更是憑事實本身,藉著那些已從復活進入生命的人,誇耀我們已領受了祂應許的明確盼望——那麼,給不信的人還能留下甚麼藉口呢?我們豈不要棄絕那些藉哲學和虛空的妄言企圖輕視信德之純樸的人,而在我們的微小中持守我們盼望最純潔的宣認,照著那同一恩典之先知的樣式,向主說:「祢收回他們的氣息,他們就死亡,歸於塵土」;
9:223
emitte Spiritum tuum et creabuntur t et renovabis faciem terræ, quando et lætari Dominum in operibus suis affirmat, cum defi­ cient peccatores a terra. Quomodo enim quis pec­ cator ultra vocabitur, cuin jam peccata esse non possint? CAPUT XXVII. Quod non sit contra id quod deceat resurrectio mor­ tuorum. Sed sunt quidam qui humanarum cogitationum defectu, ad mensuram nostram divinam potentiam Judicantes, quod ipsi capere nequeunt, nec Deo esse possibile confirmant.
'send forth Thy Spirit, and they shall be created, and Thou shalt renew the face of the earth'—when also he affirms that the Lord shall rejoice in His works, 'when sinners shall fail from the earth.' For how shall anyone any longer be called a sinner, when sins can no longer exist? CHAPTER XXVII. That the resurrection of the dead is not contrary to what is fitting. But there are certain men who, from the deficiency of human reasonings, judging the divine power by our own measure, affirm that what they themselves cannot grasp is not possible even to God.
「祢發出祢的靈,他們便受造,祢也更新地面」——他並肯定主必因祂的工作歡喜,「當罪人從地上消滅的時候」。因為當罪不再能存在時,誰還能再被稱為罪人呢?第二十七章。論死人復活並不違背合宜之事。但有些人,因人類推理的不足,竟以我們自己的尺度去衡量神的大能,他們既自己不能領會,便斷言這對神也不可能。
9:224
Ostendunt enim nobis antiquo­ rum reliquias mortuorum prorsus absumptas, et quas ignis redegit in cineres, et super hæc bestias quae vescuntur carnibus, huic rationi admovere mon­ strantur, et piscem qui carnem hominis naufragio pereuntis in suum trajicit corpus, et hunc rursus effectum hominis escam, atque in comedentis quan­ titatem per digestionem esse conversum, multaque alia nimis inepta, et magni Dei virtuti atque magni­ ficentiæ prorsus indigna ad eversionem veri dogma­ tis proferunt; tanquam non possit Deus per hæc ea­ dein rursus ex consummatione quod est proprium hominis reformare.
For they point out to us the remains of the ancient dead utterly consumed, both those which fire has reduced to ashes, and beyond this they are shown to bring forward to this argument the beasts that feed on flesh, and the fish that draws into its own body the flesh of a man perishing in shipwreck, and this in turn becomes a man's food and through digestion is converted into the bulk of the one who eats; and many other things exceedingly absurd and wholly unworthy of the power and magnificence of the great God they allege for the overthrow of the true doctrine—as though God could not, by these same things, restore again from their consumption that which is proper to man.
因為他們向我們指出古時死人的遺骸已徹底消滅,有些被火燒成灰燼,此外他們又被見舉出吃肉的野獸,以及那把海難中喪命之人的肉吞入自己身體的魚,而這魚又成了人的食物,藉消化轉化為吃它之人的體積;他們還舉出許多其他極為荒謬、全然不配偉大之神的大能與威嚴的事,用以推翻真道——彷彿神不能藉這些同樣的事,從其消解中重新恢復那屬於人的成分。
9:225
Sed nos in brevi prolixos vanis­ jimae rationis eorum succidamus excursus, confiten­ tes resolutiones corporis in ea fieri pro quibus con­ stat, nec solum terram, juxta divini sermonis aucto­ citatem, in terram reverti, sed et aerem atque humo­ rem suæ simillimæ portioni restitui, et singula quæ in nobis sunt, ad originemque propriam commigrare.
But let us in brief cut short the lengthy excursions of their most vain reasoning, confessing that the dissolutions of the body take place into those things of which it consists; and that not only does earth, according to the authority of the divine word, return to earth, but that air also and moisture are restored each to its own most like portion, and that each of the things that are in us migrates back to its own origin.
但讓我們簡短地截斷他們那最虛妄之推理的冗長離題,承認身體的消解乃是歸回它所由構成的諸元素;並且不僅照神聖話語的權威,土歸於土,連空氣與水分也各歸回與自己最相似的部分,而我們裡面的每一成分都遷回它本來的源頭。
9:226
Et licet volucribus carne vescentibus, licet feris carne vescentibus humanum corpus tradatur in cibum, eis­ que his casibus misceatur, licet sub dentibus piscium veniat, et per ignem in vapores convertatur et pul­ verem, uhicunque juxta suhjeclam rationem quis cir­ cumtulerit hominem, intra hunc mundum eum esse necesse sit, quem Dei manu contincri vox instruit divinitus inspirata, cum di.it, quia in manu ejus sunt omnes fines terræ. Quod si tu non potes ignorare quæ tuo palmo contineas, opinaris scientiam Dei, qua est tua virtute superior, eorum quæ virtutc di­ vina manu continentur id quod certum ea minime perscrutari? CAPUT XXVIII.
And although the human body be given as food to birds that feed on flesh, and to beasts that feed on flesh, and be mingled by these chances; although it come under the teeth of fishes, and through fire be turned into vapours and dust—wheresoever, according to the proposed reasoning, one carry the man about, it must needs be that he is within this world, which the voice divinely inspired teaches to be held in the hand of God, when it says that 'in His hand are all the ends of the earth.' But if you cannot be ignorant of what you hold in your own palm, do you suppose that the knowledge of God, which is superior to your power, fails to search out, of those things which are held by the divine power and hand, even that which is certain to it? CHAPTER XXVIII.
縱然人的身體被吃肉的飛鳥、被吃肉的野獸當作食物吞下,並因這些遭遇而與牠們相混;縱然它落在魚的牙齒之下,又經火化為蒸氣與塵土——無論按所提出的道理把人帶往何處,他必然仍在這世界之內,而神聖默示的聲音教導說,這世界是被握在神的手中,因它說「地的四極都在祂手中」。但你既不能不知你自己掌中所握的,難道你以為那超乎你能力之上的神的知識,竟不能查究那被神聖大能與手所握之物中,那對祂確定無疑的事麼?第二十八章。
9:227
Quod possibile sit, in omnia elementa humanis corpori­ bus resolutis, iterum ex communi proprium singulis integrari. Sed forsilan ad elementa totius mundi respiciens, difficile putas statum nostrum ad cognatum elemen­ tum aeris attractum, calidum quoque et humidum, atque terrenum nostre substantiæ similiter propriis partibus immixtum, iterum de communi singulis quod cst proprium posse restitui. Proinde tu vel exemplis humanis non cogitas hoc quoque divinæ virtutis fines non posse transcendere.
That it is possible, when human bodies have been dissolved into all the elements, that out of what is common to each its own be again restored and made whole. But perhaps, looking to the elements of the whole world, you think it difficult that our condition, drawn back into the kindred element of air—the warm too and the moist, and the earthy of our substance, likewise mingled with their own proper parts—can again be restored from the common store to each that which is its own. Accordingly, you do not consider, even by human examples, that this too cannot transcend the bounds of the divine power.
論這是可能的:當人的身體消解為一切元素之後,那從共同之中屬於各人自己的,又能重被恢復而完整。但你也許注目於全世界的元素,便覺得難以相信:我們的成分既被吸回與之同類的空氣元素,連我們體質中的熱與濕、以及土質的部分也同樣與各自本有的部分相混,竟還能從共有之中各自重得其所屬。然而你即使從人的例子,也不思想這同樣不能超越神聖大能的界限。
9:228
Vidisti profecto alicubi in commorationibus hominum communem gregem simul in commune pascentem, sed cum rursus grex per possessores dividitur proprios, seD consuetudo locorum, seu signa pecoribus imposita, quod suum est restituit singulis ? tale quid et de temetipso pcr­ tractans, minime ab eo quod decet aberrabis. Deni­ que cum nalurali vinculo atque charitate circa corpus suum quod inhabitavit anima detenta sit, inest ei la- -Lens quædam permixtio quam nunc habent invicem affectio quædam atque cognitio, veluti a natura qui. busdam signis impositis, per qua; communitas incon­ fusa permanens discernatur proprietatibus singulo­ rum.
You have doubtless somewhere, in the dwelling-places of men, seen a common flock pasturing together in common; yet when again the flock is divided among its proper owners, either the habit of the places, or the marks set upon the cattle, restores to each its own. Pondering some such thing concerning yourself, you will by no means stray from what is fitting. In short, since by a natural bond and affection the soul is held about the body which it inhabited, there is in it a certain latent commixture, a certain affection and acquaintance which they now have toward one another, as though by certain marks set by nature, by which their fellowship, remaining unconfused, is distinguished by the properties of each.
你無疑曾在人居之處某地,見過一群牲畜一同在公共草場上放牧;但當這群牲畜又被分歸各自的主人時,或是因牠們對地方的習慣,或是因牲畜身上所打的記號,便把屬各人之物歸還各人。你若這樣思想自己的情形,便絕不至偏離合宜之理。總之,靈魂既藉著本性的聯繫與愛戀,被繫於它所曾居住的身體,其中便有一種隱藏的交融,就是它們如今彼此所懷的某種情感與相識,彷彿藉本性所設的某些記號,使它們的相通雖保持不相混,卻仍以各自的特性得以分辨。
9:229
Cum igitur anima cognatam atque propriam rem ad semetipsam rursus attraxerit, quis, oro, labor divina praesertim non prohibente natura virtu­ tem, ut sua rursus in se conveniant, et ineffabili quadam naturæ concursione ad propria quæque con­ tendant ? Quod autem animæ et post resolutionem signa quaedam conformationis nostræ permaneant, ostendit illa disputatio quæ apud inferos facta est, quando corporibus jam sepulturæ traditis, animabus inhæserat quædam notitia corporalis, per quam et Lazarus agnosci, nec dives potuit ignorari.
When therefore the soul shall have drawn back again to itself its kindred and proper thing, what labour, I pray—nature in particular not forbidding—is it for the divine power that its own should again come together into itself, and by a certain ineffable concurrence of nature each part strive toward its own? But that even after the dissolution certain marks of our conformation remain to the souls, is shown by that discourse which took place among those below, when, the bodies having already been given over to burial, there clung to the souls a certain bodily recognition, by which both Lazarus could be known and the rich man could not be unrecognized.
所以當靈魂把它同類且本屬於它之物重新吸回自身時,我問,這對神聖的大能有何難處——尤其是本性並不攔阻——以致它本有之物不能重新歸合於自身,並藉本性某種難以言喻的會聚,使各部分各趨其所屬呢?至於靈魂在消解之後仍存留我們形態的某些記號,這由陰間所發生的那段對話可以顯明:當身體已交付埋葬之後,靈魂仍附帶著某種身體的識別,藉此拉撒路得以被認出,那財主也不能不被認得。
9:230
Nihil ergo extra rationem est, si credatur et communi proprie­ late resurgentibus redire corporibus, et maxime id animadvertit qui naturam studiosius investigare cu­ ravit. Non enim per omnia fluunt atque commutantur ea quæ nostra sunt; alioquin incomprehensibilia prorsuS existerent, nullum stationem habentia per naturam. Sed diligentius explorata ratione, videtur eorum quæ in nobis sunt aliquid stare, aliud vero mutatione defluere. Corpus enim per incrementa de- trimentaque mutatur, veluti vestes quasdam per æta- tes quasdam se induens consequentes;
Nothing therefore is beyond reason, if it be believed that bodies, in rising again, return with what is proper to each out of the common store; and this he most especially observes who has taken pains to investigate nature more diligently. For not in all respects do the things that are ours flow and change; otherwise they would be utterly incomprehensible, having no stability by nature. But when the matter is more carefully examined, it appears that of the things which are in us, something stands, while something else flows away by change. For the body is changed through increases and decreases, putting on, as it were, certain garments through certain successive ages;
所以若相信身體在復活時,從共有之中各帶其所屬而歸回,這並無不合理之處;那曾用心更細究本性的人,尤能看出這事。因為屬我們之物並非在一切方面都流動變遷;不然,它們就全然不可理解,按本性毫無穩定可言。但若更細心地考察其理,便見我們裡面之物有些是穩定不動的,有些則藉變遷而流逝。因為身體藉增長與消減而改變,彷彿隨著相繼的年歲穿上某些衣裳;
9:231
stat autem per omnes has mutationes species inconvertibiliter, in se signa quæ sibi semel a natura sunt impressa non descrens, quibus per universas corporis muta­ tiones suam notitiam retinet. Subtrahenda est autem huic rationi illa permutatio quæ speciei aliqua oc­ casione conjungitur; nam veluti alienam quamdam personam fœditatem sumit species, quam per lan­ guoris incommoda sustinet, qua ratione quadam sub­ lata, sicut a Naaman Syro, vel ab his quos Evange­ lia referunt, rursus species quæ sub passione latebat, in suam notitiam revertitur sospitate.
yet through all these changes the form stands unchangeably, not deserting in itself the marks which were once impressed upon it by nature, by which it retains its recognition through all the body's changes. But there must be withdrawn from this reasoning that alteration which is joined to the form on some occasion; for the form takes on, as it were, an alien person of foulness, which it bears through the troubles of sickness; and when this is by some means removed—as in Naaman the Syrian, or in those whom the Gospels record—the form that lay hidden under the affliction returns again into its own recognition by recovery of health.
然而那形態藉著這一切變遷,仍不變地存留,不在自身中失去本性曾一度印於其上的記號,藉此記號,它在身體一切變化之中保有自己的識別。但在這道理中當除去那因某種緣故而附於形態的變異;因為形態彷彿披上一個外來的醜陋之人,那是它因疾病的苦楚所承擔的;而當這藉某種方法被除去時——正如敘利亞人乃縵,或福音書所記的那些人——那隱藏在病苦之下的形態,便藉痊癒重歸於自己的識別。
9:232
Igitur, juxta id quod Deo est similis, nulla mutatione fluit atque con­ vertitur, sed fixa permanet, idipsum semper existens, secundum quam reformatio noslra divinam similitu­ dincui continet ; et quoniam differentias speciei tem­ peramentorum qualitates quæ mutantur efficiunt, temperatio vero nihil aliud quam elementorum est habitus, elementa autem dicamus quae universae con­ ditioni subjecta sunt, ex quibus et humanum corpus subsistere profitemur, necessario species veluti im­ pressa signaculo permanet amima, formamque ipsam expressione susceptam nullatenus ignorat.
Therefore, according to that whereby it is like to God, the soul flows and is changed by no alteration, but remains fixed, ever existing as the selfsame; and according to this our re-formation maintains the divine likeness. And since the differences of the form are wrought by the qualities of the temperaments which change, while the temperament is nothing other than the disposition of the elements—and let us call elements those things which are subject to the whole creation, of which we profess that the human body also subsists—necessarily the form, as though stamped by a seal, remains in the soul, and it in no way is ignorant of the very shape which it received by impression.
所以,按著靈魂與神相似的那一面,它不因任何變異而流動或更改,乃是固定常存,永是同一自身;按此,我們的重塑便保有神聖的形像。又因形態的種種差異乃由變動之諸體質的性質所造成,而體質不外乎是諸元素的配置——讓我們稱那些隸屬於全受造界、我們也承認人身由之而立的事物為元素——故形態必然彷彿被印章所印,存留在靈魂中,靈魂也絕不忘失它藉印壓所領受的那形貌本身。
9:233
Unde tempore resurrectionis ea recipiat rursus in se, quæ formae ipsi congruerint, congruunt autem illa quae­ cunque ab initio speciei probantur esse inserta; ergo nihil extra rationem videtur, rursus ex communi ad singulos redire quod suuin est. Dicitur autem et ύδραργύριον , quod argentum vivum vulgus appellat, si per prona ac. pulverulenta loca fundatur in pilas minutissimas per terram dividi, nec illis concurrenti­ bus invicem posse misceri. Si quis autem rursus id quod multipliciter dispersum est in unum redigat, proprio generi fontem conjungi, nullis ad commixtio­ nem suam interjectionibus irretitum, Tale quid ar­ bitror oportere, et circa compositionem hominis animadvertere.
Whence at the time of the resurrection it receives back again into itself those things which were suited to the form itself; and those things are suited which from the beginning are proved to have been implanted in the form. Therefore nothing appears beyond reason, that out of the common store there should again return to each that which is its own. It is said also of quicksilver—which the common people call living silver—that if it be poured out over sloping and dusty places, it is divided over the ground into the tiniest globules, and these cannot mingle though running together; yet if anyone again gather into one that which was scattered in many ways, the spring joins itself to its own kind, entangled by no interpositions to hinder its commixture. Some such thing I judge ought to be observed also concerning the composition of man.
因此在復活之時,靈魂便把那些與該形態相合之物重新收回自身;而那些自起初被證明已植入形態之中的,正是與之相合的。所以絕無不合理之處:那從共有之中應重歸各人所屬。又有人論到水銀——俗稱「活銀」——說它若傾倒在傾斜而多塵之處,便在地上分成極微小的珠粒,這些珠粒雖滾在一處卻不能相混;但人若把那多方散開之物重新聚為一,那水泉便與自己的同類相合,毫無夾雜物攔阻其相融。我以為論到人之構成,也當看出某種如此的情形。
9:234
Mox enim ut a Deo facultas fuerit at­ tributa, ultro sibi partes similes propriis miscebun­ tur partibus, sine ulla difficultate ejus qui naturam reformare dignatur. Nam et in his quae nascuntur e terra nullum laborem naturas conspicimus, cum triti­ cum, vel milicem, vel quid aliud seminis frumenti vel leguminis in culmum, aristas spicasque convertit sine difficultate; namque ultro congruens esca de com- muni ad uniuscujusque proprietatem seminis transit.
For as soon as the faculty has been granted by God, the like parts will of their own accord mingle with their proper parts, without any difficulty to Him who deigns to re-form nature. For even in those things which spring up from the earth we behold no labour to nature, when it converts wheat, or millet, or any other seed of grain or pulse, into stalk, ears, and spikes, without difficulty; for the suitable nourishment of its own accord passes from the common store to the property of each seed.
因為神一旦賜下這能力,相似的部分便自動與其本有的部分相混,對那甘願重塑本性者毫無難處。因為連在從地裡長出之物中,我們也見本性毫無勞苦,當它把麥子、或粟、或別樣的穀類或豆類種子,毫無困難地化為莖、穗與麥芒;因為合宜的養分自動從共有之中過渡到各粒種子所特有的成分。
9:235
Si igitur omnibus e terra germinibus communiter humor exponitur, et unuMquodque per eum nutritur, et quod sibi competit, ad propria trahit augmenta, quid novum si et in reparatione nostræreparationis (sic) hoc fiat, cum a singulis resurgentibus id quod est proprium, sicut in seminibus accidit, attrabatur? Igi­ tur ex omnibus possibile est addiscere nihil extra ea quæ nobis experientia ipsa nota sunt prædicationem resurrectionis existere. Ei quidem de his quæ nostra sunt, id quod est notissimum silentio pene transie­ ram, ipsum dico nostræ formationis exordium. Quis enim nesciat mirificentiam naturæ, et quid accipiat materna vulva, quidve perficiat?
If therefore moisture is set forth in common to all the seeds in the earth, and each is nourished by it, and draws to its own growth that which is fitting to it, what new thing is it if in our restoration this too take place, when from each thing that rises again that which is its own is drawn, as happens in seeds? Therefore from all things it is possible to learn that the preaching of the resurrection is nothing beyond those things which are known to us by experience itself. And indeed, of those things which are ours, I had almost passed over in silence that which is best known—I mean the very beginning of our formation. For who is ignorant of the marvel of nature, and what the maternal womb receives, and what it brings to perfection?
所以若水分被普遍供給地裡一切的種子,每一粒都藉它得滋養,並把合適於己的吸取以成自己的生長,那麼在我們的復原中若這事也發生,從每一復活之物中吸取那屬於它自己的,正如種子所發生的,這又有何新奇呢?所以從萬事都可以學到:復活的宣講絕不超出那些藉經驗本身為我們所知之事。而論到屬我們之事,我幾乎默然略過了那最為人所知的——我是說我們形成的起頭本身。因為誰不知本性的奇妙,並母腹所領受的是甚麼,又使之成全為甚麼呢?
9:236
Cernis quam simplex quodammodo est et exiguum quod visceribus in oc- casioncm constitutionis nostri corporis deponitur; varietatem vero perrectæ substantiæ quis poterit ex­ plicare sermone? Quis autem natura communis hu­ juscemodi opus esse cognoscens, non possibile putet esse quod geritur? Quod si illud parvum, et quod pene pro nihilo ducitur, hujus tantæ rei principium ese noscatur, magnum autem dico non solum ad for­ mationem respiciens corporis, sed prius animam ipsam prorsus admiratione dignam esse pronuntio, et ea quæcirca ipsam mentem cernuntur. CAPUT XXIX.
You see how simple in a manner and how slight is that which is deposited in the inward parts for the occasion of the constituting of our body; but the variety of the perfected substance—who could unfold it in speech? And who, recognizing such a work to be of common nature, would not deem possible that which is wrought? But if that small thing, which is reckoned almost as nothing, is known to be the beginning of so great a matter—and I call it great not only with regard to the formation of the body, but I declare that the soul itself first is altogether worthy of admiration, and the things which are discerned concerning the mind itself. CHAPTER XXIX.
你看那為構成我們身體而置於內裡之物,是何等的單純又何等的微小;但那已成全之實質的紛繁多樣——誰能用言語把它陳明呢?又有誰,既認得這乃是本性所共有的工作,而不認所成之事為可能呢?但若那微小、被視為幾近於無之物,被認出是如此大事的起頭——我稱之為大,不僅就身體的形成而言,更宣告靈魂本身首先全然配得稱奇,連那關乎心智本身所察見的事也是如此。第二十九章。
9:237
Contra eos qui dicunt exstare animas ante corpora sua, vel econtrario ante animas corpora formari, in quo quædam fabulosa opinio de animabus. Puto namque extra propositum esse negotium ut perquiratur a ne'bis quod in ecclesiis ambigitur de animæ constitutione vel corporis. Quibusdam etenim visum est, qui ante nos de principatibus disputantes veluti quamdam pestilentiam protulerunt, quod in conversatione propriæ animæ ante subsistant. Sint­ qee illic tam malitiæ quam virtutis exempli propo­ sita: et perseverantem quidem in bonis animam nulla corporalis conjunctionis experiMenta sentire; si vero boni participatione defluxerit, tunc ad banc vitam re­ cedere, atque in corpore commorari.
Against those who say that souls exist before their bodies, or on the contrary that bodies are formed before souls, wherein there is a certain fabulous opinion concerning souls. For I think it beside our purpose to inquire into what is disputed in the churches concerning the constitution of the soul or of the body. For it has seemed good to certain men, who before us, disputing about first principles, brought forth, as it were, a certain pestilence—namely, that souls subsist beforehand in a conversation proper to themselves. And let there be there set forth examples both of malice and of virtue: and the soul that perseveres in good things feels no experience of bodily conjunction; but if it lapse from the participation of the good, then it withdraws to this life, and dwells in a body.
駁斥那些說靈魂先於其身體存在,或反過來說身體先於靈魂被造的人,其中含有某種關乎靈魂的虛構之見。因為我認為去探究教會中所爭辯的、關乎靈魂或身體之構成的問題,是離我們本題的。因為有些人——他們在我們以先論辯本原時,彷彿產出一種瘟疫——以為靈魂先在其本有的境界中存活。在那裡,惡與善的榜樣都被擺出:那持守善的靈魂便不感受任何與身體聯合的經驗;但它若從善的分享中墮落,便退入此生,並住在身體之中。
9:238
Alii vero tradi­ tum a Moyse ordinem de conditione hominis intuen­ tes, secundo loco, id est post corpus animam juxta tempus affirmant, cum primum accipiens Deus limum de terra formavit hominem, et ita per insuffiationem deiuceps animavit. Hac autem ratione præstantius ostendunt corpus esse quam animam quæs est ei con­ serta, eo quod ante formatum est. Dicunt enim propter corpus animam factam, ne sine spiritu for­ matio immobilis permaneret. Omne vero quod pro­ pter aliud efficitur, vilius est profecto eo propter quod efficitur, sicut Evangelia profitentur, cum anima plus est quam esca, et corpus quam vestimen­ tum, quia propter hæc ista concessa sunt;
But others, regarding the order handed down by Moses concerning the condition of man, affirm that the soul is in the second place—that is, after the body—in respect of time, since God first, taking clay from the earth, formed man, and so thereafter by inbreathing gave him a soul. And by this reasoning they show the body to be more excellent than the soul which is knit to it, in that it was formed before. For they say that the soul was made for the sake of the body, lest the formation should remain immobile without a spirit. But everything that is made for the sake of another is surely baser than that for the sake of which it is made—as the Gospels declare, since the soul is more than food, and the body more than raiment, because these latter were granted for the sake of the former;
但另有些人,注目於摩西所傳關乎人之受造的次序,便斷言靈魂就時間而論居於第二位——即在身體之後——因為神起先取地上的塵土造了人,然後才藉吹氣使他成為有靈魂的。他們以此推理顯明身體比那與之相連的靈魂更為尊貴,因為身體先被形成。因為他們說靈魂是為身體而造的,免得那形體沒有靈而保持不動。但凡為別物而造的,必比那為它而造之物更為卑賤——正如福音書所宣告的,因為靈魂勝於食物,身體勝於衣裳,因這些後者乃是為前者而賜下的;
9:239
non enim propter escam facta est anima, nec vestimentorum gratia constat esse corpora formata; sed cum hæc existerent, illa propter usum necesaria sunt provisa. Quoniam igitur assertio utriusque opinionis vitupe­ ratione non caret, et eorum qui prius vivere animas in suo quodam statu atque ordine opinantur, et eo­ rum qui eas post corpora creatas existimant, Deus- sarium esse reor ea quae in eorum dogmatibus as­ seruatur aliquatenus explorare.
for the soul was not made for the sake of food, nor are bodies established as formed for the sake of garments; but when these existed, the latter were provided as necessary for use. Since therefore the assertion of either opinion is not free from reproach—both of those who suppose that souls live beforehand in a certain state and order of their own, and of those who think them created after the bodies—I deem it necessary to examine to some extent the things which are asserted in their doctrines.
因為靈魂不是為食物而造的,身體也不是為衣裳而被形成的;乃是當這些存在之後,那些後者才被供應為使用上的必需。所以,既然這兩種意見的主張都不免受責備——無論是那些以為靈魂先在某種自有之境界與次序中存活的人,還是那些以為靈魂在身體之後被造的人——我便認為有必要在某種程度上考察他們教義中所主張的事。
9:240
Nam si volumus utrorumque diligentius investigare sermones, et uni­ versas ineptias patefaccre quae ipsorum opinionibus probantur annexae, spatio longi temporis indigemus, et ideo paucis, sicut est possibile, ea quæ ab eis dicta sunt intuentes, ea refellere non moremur. Qui primæ professioni patrocinium præstant, et antiquiorem animarum conversationem propter hanc vitam cor­ poris asserunt, non mihi videntur gentilium dogma­ tum erroribus carere, qui multa de animarum in cor­ pora transformatione fabulosa finxerunt. Quos si quis diligenter examinet, ad hoc asserLiones corum perduci ipsa necessilate deprehendet.
For if we wish to investigate more diligently the arguments of both, and to lay open all the absurdities which are proved to be annexed to their opinions, we have need of a long space of time; and therefore, looking briefly, as far as is possible, at the things said by them, we shall not delay to refute them. Those who lend patronage to the first profession, and assert an earlier conversation of souls for the sake of this life of the body, do not seem to me to be free from the errors of the Gentile doctrines, who feigned many fabulous things concerning the transformation of souls into bodies. And if anyone examine these men diligently, he will find that by very necessity their assertions are brought to this point.
因為我們若要更仔細地考究兩派的論證,並揭露被證明附於他們意見的一切荒謬,便需要漫長的時間;所以我們盡可能簡短地察看他們所說的話,便不遲延地加以駁斥。那些為第一種主張辯護、斷言靈魂在此身體之生以先有更早境界的人,在我看來並非沒有外邦教義的謬誤,因為這些外邦人虛構了許多關乎靈魂遷入身體的荒誕之事。人若仔細考察這些人,便會發現他們的主張因必然之勢而被引到這地步。
9:241
Quod autem quemdam retulisse qui apud eos sapiens esse puta­ balur, 'quod et vir fuerit ct femina, deinde in volu­ cres evolaverit ; itemque idem interdum effloruerit, et ad postremum vitam sit in humorem sortitus, nec procul distat a vero, et quidem juxta judicium ejus quein talia proferre non puduit. Vere namque rana­ rum corvorumque garrulitatibus et irrationabilitate piscium, et arborum insensibilitate digna hæc corum dogmata comprobantur, quæ unam animam per tot res pertransire confirmant. Ineptiaæ hujus hæc causa est, quod ante subsistere animas arbitrantur. Consc­ quenter enim principium dogmatis eorum in ante­ hora teudens ac promovens, usque ad hæc monstra delabitur.
But that someone, who among them was reckoned to be wise, related that he had been both man and woman, and then had flown away into birds; and likewise that the same had at times bloomed as a plant, and at last had obtained his life as moisture—this is not far from the truth, indeed according to the judgment of him who was not ashamed to put forth such things. For truly these doctrines of theirs are proved worthy of the chattering of frogs and crows, and of the irrationality of fishes, and the insensibility of trees, which affirm that one soul passes through so many things. The cause of this absurdity is that they suppose souls to subsist beforehand. For consequently the principle of their doctrine, tending and pressing toward the earlier hour, slides down even to these monstrosities.
至於說有一個在他們中間被視為智者的人,自稱曾既是男又是女,然後飛入飛鳥之中;又說同一個人有時開花為草木,最後得了水作為他的生命——這話與真相相去不遠,至少照那不以說出這等事為恥之人的判斷是如此。因為他們這些教義果然配得青蛙與烏鴉的聒噪、魚的無理性、和樹木的無知覺,因它們斷言一個靈魂遊歷經過如此眾多之物。這荒謬的緣由,乃是他們以為靈魂是先存的。因為他們教義的本原既往更早之時傾斜推進,便順理成章地下滑至這等怪誕。
9:242
Si enim propter malitiam aliquam a su­ blimiore statu decidens anima, sicut asserunt, effici­ tur homo, vitiosior autem profecto est conversatio corporalis quam illa intellectuatis, necessitas omnis est, eam in tali vita positam, in qua plures occasio­ nes peccandi deesse non possint, amplioribus malitiis allici, et vitiosiorem quam antea declarari. Humanæ vero animæ vitiositas, irrationabilis rei similitudo est, cui familiariter adjuncta in naturam jumentorum quodammodo recidit. Semel enim per malitiam pro- peraus etiam cum irrationabilis effecta fuerit, tan­ quam a majorum propoSitione desistit. Mali namque statio virtutis est initium, Viitus autem irrationabili­ bus nulla cSt.
For if, on account of some malice, the soul falling from a more sublime state becomes, as they assert, a man—and the bodily conversation is surely more vicious than that intellectual one—every necessity is that the soul, placed in such a life, in which the many occasions of sinning cannot be lacking, should be enticed to greater malices, and be declared more vicious than before. But the viciousness of the human soul is a likeness of an irrational thing, to which, familiarly joined, it in a manner falls back into the nature of beasts of burden. For having once hastened through malice, even when it has been made irrational, it desists, as it were, from the purpose of the greater things. For the standing of evil is the beginning of virtue; but to irrational things there is no virtue.
因為若靈魂如他們所言,因某種惡而從更崇高之境界墮落,成為人——而身體的境況確比那理智的境況更為敗壞——那麼必然的是:靈魂置於這樣一種生命中,其中犯罪的機會無數不缺,必被引誘至更大的惡,並顯為比先前更敗壞。而人的靈魂之敗壞,乃是與無理性之物相似,它既與之親密相連,便在某種意義上倒退入牲畜的本性。因為靈魂一旦藉惡而急趨,即使已成了無理性的,也彷彿從那更高之物的目標退離。因為惡的止息乃是德行的起頭;但無理性之物毫無德行可言。
9:243
Semper igitur in pejus ipsa necessitate mutabitur, in id quod est deterius abjectiusque per­ ficiens, et ad hoc quod extremum est jugi muta­ tione pertendens. Sicut autem transcendit rationalis natura sensibilem, sic ab hac ad insensibilem canus est. Sed hactenus eorum sermo procedens, licet extra veritatem feratur, tamen quadam consequentia ex ineptis incita cosequitur. Hinc etiam per ineo. grua c( impo sibilia fabulosum eis dogma generatur, quod animæ consequenter omnimodum demonstret interi­ tum.
Therefore by very necessity it will always be changed for the worse, completing itself into that which is more degraded and more abject, and stretching on by continual change to that which is the extreme. And as the rational nature transcends the sensible, so from this there is a descent to the insensible. But their discourse, proceeding thus far, though it be carried beyond the truth, nevertheless by a certain consequence is driven on from absurdities. Hence also, through incongruous and impossible things, there is generated for them a fabulous doctrine, which would consequently demonstrate the utter perishing of the soul.
所以靈魂因必然之勢必常變向更壞,成就自己於那更卑下更可鄙之境,並藉不斷的變遷伸向那極端。正如理性的本性超越有感覺的,照樣由此又下降至無感覺的。但他們的論述進行到此,雖被引出真理之外,卻因某種前後一貫而被荒謬之事推著前行。由此,藉著不協調與不可能之事,便為他們生出一種虛構的教義,這教義順理成章地要證明靈魂的全然消滅。
9:244
Quæ enim semel a sublimi conversatione deffuit, in nulla mensura malitiæ stare jani poterit, sed pas­ sionum affectionibus irretita, a rationali quidem ad irrationale transit, ab eo quoque in virgulta insensi­ bilia transferentur. Insensibile vero et exanime qua­ dani ratione vicina sunt, exanime autem sequitur id quod non est. Ita prorsus hac corum consecutione, ad id quod non ex , anima resolvetur, quia im­ possibilis erat ei per necessitatem ad meliora trans- gressus : sed enim seducunt animam ex dumetis ad hominem ; ergo praestantiorem vitam quæin dumetis est modum conversationis incorporeæper ista de­ monstrant.
For that which has once flowed down from the sublime conversation will no longer be able to stand at any measure of malice, but, entangled by the affections of the passions, passes from the rational to the irrational, and from this too is transferred into insensible shrubs. But the insensible and the lifeless are by a certain reasoning near to one another, and the lifeless follows upon that which is not. Thus altogether, by this consequence of theirs, the soul will be dissolved into that which is not, since by necessity passage to better things was impossible for it. But indeed they lead the soul back from the thickets to man; therefore by these things they demonstrate the life that is in the thickets to be a more excellent manner of bodiless conversation.
因為那一旦從崇高境界流落之物,便不能再止於任何程度的惡,乃被諸情慾的牽纏,由理性過渡到無理性,又從這裡被轉移入無感覺的灌木。而無感覺的與無生命的,按某種道理彼此相近,無生命的又隨在那「非存在」之後。如此,照他們這一貫的推論,靈魂終必消解為「非存在」,因為按必然之勢,它不可能過渡到更善之境。然而他們又把靈魂從荊棘叢領回為人;那麼他們便藉這些事,反而證明荊棘叢中的生命是一種更優越的、無形體的境況。
9:245
Ostensum est namque, quod processus animæ nitentis ad mala, consequenter devolvatur ad infirma, inferiorque sit exanimis natura quam insen­ sibilis, ad quam extremitatem initium dogmalis corum animam consequenter adducit. Sed quia hoc illi no­ lunt, aut intra sensibilia concludunt animam, necesse est, aut si hinc ea rursus ad humanum reducunt meliorem, sicut dictum est, ligneam vitam primæ ilius institutionis ostendi, quandoquidem exinde ad malitiam facta ruina sit. Ifinc autem ad virtutem tri­ buchatur excursus. Igitur sine capite et sine fine hæc assertio esse convincitur, quæ animas apud se prius præter vitam carnis astruit vivere, et propter mali- tiam corporibus obligari.
For it has been shown that the progress of the soul straining toward evil consequently rolls down to feeble things, and that the lifeless nature is lower than the insensible, to which extremity the principle of their doctrine consequently leads the soul. But because they are unwilling for this, either they must confine the soul within sensible things, or, if from this they again lead it back to the human—a better state—it must, as has been said, be shown that the woody life was of that first institution, seeing that thereafter the fall into malice took place; whence afterward there is granted an ascent toward virtue. Therefore this assertion is convicted of being without head and without end, which maintains that souls live beforehand by themselves apart from the life of the flesh, and are bound to bodies on account of malice.
因為已經顯明:靈魂趨向惡的進程順理成章地滾向衰弱之物,而無生命的本性比無感覺的更低,他們教義的本原順理成章地把靈魂引向這極端。但因他們不願如此,便或須把靈魂限於有感覺之物之內,或者若從此又把它領回到人——一種較佳之境——那麼如前所述,便須顯明那木質的生命是屬於那起初的設立,既然此後才有墮入惡的傾覆;由此後來又得有向德行的上升。所以這主張被駁倒為無首無尾,因它主張靈魂先離肉體之生而自存,又因惡而被繫於身體。
9:246
Eorum vero qui juniorem corpore animam esse contendunt. destruetur incon­ stantia, per ea quæin conseqnentibus exponuntur. Qua propter ea rejicienda est ratio quæ ab utrisque defertur, per medium vero opinionum reor oportere dogma nostrum in veritate dirigere. Est autem hoc quod nec juxta gentilium seductionem malitia qua­ dam depressas animas opinamur. quas illi quod ad rotationem totius poli, quæ nimia velocitate fertur, pcr imbecilitatem concurrere nequeant, ob hoc in terram recidere profitentur ; nec rursus hominem velut instan­ tiant quadam ratione ante formantis (sic), ei propterea dicimus animati commodari;
But the inconstancy of those who contend that the soul is younger than the body shall be overthrown by the things which are set forth in what follows. Wherefore the reasoning which is brought forward by both sides must be rejected; and through the middle of the opinions I judge that our doctrine ought to be directed in the truth. And this is it: that neither, after the manner of the Gentile seduction, do we suppose souls to be pressed down by some malice—which souls they declare, because they cannot keep pace, through weakness, with the rotation of the whole pole that is borne with exceeding swiftness, on this account to fall back to the earth; nor again do we say that the soul is lent to man as to one who forms it beforehand, as it were, by some present reasoning;
至於那些主張靈魂比身體年幼之人的反覆無定,將由下文所陳之事被推翻。因此,兩派所提出的推理都當棄絕;我認為當在兩種意見之間,將我們的教義引向真理。其要旨乃是:我們既不照外邦的誘惑,以為靈魂是被某種惡所壓下——他們宣稱靈魂因軟弱不能跟上那以極快速度旋轉之全天的運行,故此墜回於地;我們也不說靈魂是借給人的,彷彿借給一個藉某種當下之理先行形成它者;
9:247
alioquin institutioni lu­ teae natura intelligibilis inferior esse monstrabitur. CAPUT XXX. Assertio quod una endemque animæ et corpori cau subsistenat 'sse videatur. Sed cum sit unus homo, qui ex anima constat et corpore, unum ei et commune dare oportet institu­ tionis exordium , no sibi ipse anterior posteriorque videatur, ut corporis in eo conditio prima, et secunda eonstet alterius. Et in praesentia quidem divinae vir­ tutis juxta rationem paulo ante digestam. omnem plenitudinem humanæ conditionis ante subsistero profitemur, testificante nobis in hoc propheta, qui dicit, nosse Dominum ornnia antequam fiant.
otherwise the intelligible nature would be shown to be inferior to the clay-made institution. CHAPTER XXX. The assertion that one and the same cause is seen to subsist for both the soul and the body. But since man is one, who consists of soul and body, it behoves to give to him one and common beginning of his institution, lest he seem to himself prior and posterior, so that the condition of the body should stand first in him, and second that of the other. And in respect of the divine power indeed, according to the reasoning a little before set forth, we profess that the whole fulness of the human condition subsists beforehand, the prophet testifying to us in this, who says that the Lord knows all things before they come to be.
不然,那可理解的本性就要顯為比那泥土所造的設立更低劣了。第三十章。論靈魂與身體被視為由同一原因而立。但既然人是一個,由靈魂與身體所組成,就當給他一個共同的受造起頭,免得他在自身中顯為先後不一,以致身體的構成在他裡面居首,靈魂的構成居次。就神聖的大能而論,照稍前所述的道理,我們承認人之整全的全備乃是先存的,先知在這事上為我們作證,他說主在萬事未成之先就知道一切。
9:248
In sin­ gulorum vero conformatione alterutrum lion præfe­ rimus alteri, nec ante corpus animam, nec econtrario dicimus, ne divisus homo juxta differentiam temporis in semetipso discedat. Nam cum duplex intelligatur nostra natura secundum doctrinam Apostoli, visibilis scilicct hominis et latentis, si aliud quidem ante sub­ sistat, aliud autem post superveniat; imperfecta qui­ dem virtus videbitur conditoris, quac non simul utro­ bique sufficiat, sed diviso opere seorsum in singulo­ rum medietatibus occupetur.
But in the conformation of individuals we do not prefer the one to the other, neither the soul before the body, nor the contrary do we say, lest the man, divided according to a difference of time, should fall apart within himself. For since our nature is understood to be twofold, according to the teaching of the Apostle—namely, of the visible man and of the hidden—if indeed one subsist before, and the other supervene after, the power of the Creator would seem imperfect, as not sufficing to both at once, but, the work being divided, occupied separately in the halves of the individuals.
但在各個體的形成上,我們不把這一者置於那一者之上,既不說靈魂先於身體,也不說相反,免得人按時間的差異被分割,在自身中崩離。因為既然照使徒的教導,我們的本性被理解為雙重的——即可見的人與隱藏的人——倘若一者先存,另一者後至,那麼造物主的大能就似乎不完全,因祂不能同時兼顧二者,乃是工作被分割,分別忙於個體的兩半之中。
9:249
Quemadmodum vero in tritico aut in alio quolibet semine cunctam speciem spica videmus quadam potentia comprehensam, hoc est fenum, culusum, internodia, necnon fructum at­ que aristas, et nibil eorum ante subsistere in natura ratione; aut post accidere dicimus; sed insitam vim semini quodam naturali omine declarari, nec aliam ei superinduci naturam : juxta hanc rationem et hu- inani causam seminis opinamur existere ; quod in prima constitutionis occasione satum quidem simul est, juxtanaturæ potentiam, tenditur vero et decla­ ratur quadam consequentia naturali, ad id quod per­ fectum est promovens, nec aliquid extrinsecus ad occasionem suas perfectionis assumens.
But just as in wheat, or in any other seed whatsoever, we behold the whole species of the ear comprehended by a certain power—that is, the haulm, the joints, the internodes, and likewise the fruit and the awns—and we do not say that any of these subsists beforehand in nature by reason, nor that it comes upon afterward; but that the implanted force is declared in the seed by a certain natural token, and that no other nature is brought in upon it: according to this reasoning we suppose that the cause of the human seed also exists; which, on the first occasion of its constitution, is indeed sown all at once, according to the power of nature, but is stretched out and declared by a certain natural consequence, advancing toward that which is perfect, and assuming nothing from without for the occasion of its perfection.
但正如在麥子、或任何別樣的種子中,我們見麥穗的全部樣式被某種潛能所包含——即麥莖、節、節間,以及果實與麥芒——而我們既不說這些中的任何一樣按理性在本性中先存,也不說它是後來加上的;乃是說那植入的力量藉某種本性的標記在種子中顯明,並無別樣本性被加於其上:照這道理,我們也以為人之種子的原因是如此存在的;它在受造的最初時機固然按本性的潛能一同被撒下,卻藉某種本性的順序被伸展、被顯明,朝向那完全的推進,並不從外面取得甚麼以成其完全。
9:250
Semetipsum namque ad id quod perfectum est consequenter ex­ tendit, ita ut ncc ante corpus animam, nec propter animam subaistere corpus afirmari veraciter po sii, sed utrum sit utrius principium juxta altiorem quidem rationem in prima voluntate Dei dispositum, juxta alterum vero in generationis occasionibus institu­ tum. Sicut enim non potest membrorum distinctio ante formationem in eo qdod ad conceptionem cor­ poris jacitur inspici, ita nec animæ contemplati proprietates in eo possibile est, priusquam exeant in operationis effectus ;
For it consequently extends itself toward that which is perfect, so that it can be truly affirmed neither that the soul subsists before the body, nor that the body subsists for the sake of the soul; but rather that whichever be the beginning of the other is, according to the higher reasoning, disposed in the first will of God, while according to the other it is established in the occasions of generation. For as the distinction of members cannot be discerned before the formation in that which is cast for the conception of the body, so neither is it possible for the contemplated properties of the soul to be discerned in it before they come forth into the effects of operation;
因為它順理成章地把自己伸向那完全的,以致既不能真實地斷言靈魂先於身體存在,也不能斷言身體是為靈魂而存在;乃是說,無論哪一者是另一者的起頭,按那更高的道理乃是在神最初的意旨中被安排,按另一面則在生成的時機中被設立。因為正如在那為身孕而播下之物中,肢體的分別在形成以先無法被察見,照樣,靈魂所被默觀的特性,在它們尚未顯為運作的效果以先,也不可能在其中被察見;
9:251
et sicut nullus ambigit in mem­ brorum et viscerum differentiis illud quod est depo­ situm, figurari non alia quadam subintrante virtute, sed ea quae inserta naturæ cat ad hanc operationem sese virtute ingerente, sic et de animae proportione rationale ratione similiter arbitrantur, qUia etsi non­ dum per aliquas visibiles operationes agnoscitur, nihil tamen in eo unios rei existere pervidetur.
and just as no one doubts that, in the differences of the members and the inward parts, that which is deposited is shaped not by some other power entering in, but by that which, implanted in nature, brings itself by its own force to this operation, so also concerning the proportion of the soul they reason in like manner concerning the rational element, that although it is not yet recognized through any visible operations, nevertheless nothing of any single thing is perceived to exist in it deficiently.
又正如無人懷疑:在肢體與內臟的種種差異中,那所播下之物乃是被形塑,並非藉某種外來進入的力量,乃是藉那植於本性、以自己之力推進到這運作之物;照樣,論到靈魂的相應之理,他們對其理性的成分也作類似的推論,就是它雖尚未藉任何可見的運作被認出,然而它裡面卻無任何一物被看出有缺。
9:252
Nam, sicut species futuri hominis in do est vi quadam atque potentia, latet autem propterea quod nequeat appa­ rere, priusquam necessaria consecutio sinat atque permittat, sic et anima est quidem in illo, licet non­ dum appareat, apparebit autem proprium et natura­ lem operationis effectum corporali sintul incremente proftcere. Nam quia non a mortuo corpore, sed a vi­ vente atque spirante, virtus in conceptione peragitur, idcirco dicimus rationis esse, ut mortuum el exanime non putetur, quod a vivente in occasionem vitæ diri­ gitur. Caro namque exanimis utique mortua est. Mors enim privatione flt animæ.
For just as the species of the future man is in the seed by a certain force and potency, but lies hidden for this reason, that it cannot appear before the necessary consequence allow and permit it, so also the soul is indeed in that seed, although it does not yet appear, but it will appear, making its own and natural effect of operation advance together with the bodily increase. For since the power in conception is wrought not by a dead body, but by a living and breathing one, therefore we say it is in accordance with reason that what is directed by a living thing toward the occasion of life should not be reckoned dead and lifeless. For flesh that is lifeless is surely dead. For death comes about by the privation of the soul.
因為正如未來之人的樣式藉某種力量與潛能存在於種子之中,卻因此緣故隱而不顯,即它不能在必然的順序容許並許可它之前顯現;照樣,靈魂也確實存在於那種子之中,雖尚未顯現,卻必顯現,使它本有且合乎本性的運作效果隨身體的增長一同進展。因為既然受孕中的力量不是由死的身體、乃是由活的、有氣息的身體所成就,所以我們說合乎理性的是:那被活物引向生命之機者,不可被視為死的、無生命的。因為無生命的肉體必然是死的。因為死乃是由靈魂的喪失而生。
9:253
Nullus autem super hoc antiquiorem privationem quam habitum dixerit, si tamen exanime quod est mortuum quisquam anima antiquius assevereL. Si quis autem evidentius exigit argumentum quod vivat illa portio quæ principium fonnandi animalis efficitur, possibile et ex aliis si­ gnis, quibus animatum discernitur atque separatur a mortuo, super hac parte consp:cerc. Argumentum namque vitalis rei de hominibus sumimus, quod ali­ quis caleat, qnod moveatur, quod operetur ; frigidum vero atque immobile in corporibus nihil cst alind quam ipsa mortalitas. Quia igitur calidum quod et operans vidimus esse de quo loquimur, hinc etiam quod exanime non sit argumenta colligimus.
But no one would say, concerning this, that the privation is older than the possession, if at least anyone should assert that the lifeless, which is dead, is older than the soul. But if anyone require a more evident argument that that portion lives which becomes the beginning of the forming animate being, it is possible, even from other signs by which the animate is distinguished and separated from the dead, to perceive concerning this part. For we take the argument of a vital thing from men, namely that someone is warm, that he is moved, that he operates; but the cold and immobile in bodies is nothing other than mortality itself. Since therefore we have seen that the warm, which also operates, is that of which we speak, hence too we gather arguments that it is not lifeless.
但論到這事,無人會說喪失比擁有更為古老,倘若有人竟主張那無生命的、就是死的,比靈魂更為古老的話。但若有人要求更明顯的論證,證明那成為被形成之生物起頭的部分是活的,那麼,即便從別的、藉以將有生命之物與死物分別開來的記號,也可就這部分加以察辨。因為我們從人身上取得「生命之物」的論據,即某人是溫熱的、是有運動的、是有作為的;而身體中那冰冷不動的,無非就是死亡本身。所以我們既已見到我們所論的這部分是溫熱而又有作為的,便也由此推出論據,證明它並非無生命的。
9:254
Sed quemadmodum juxta corporis portionem non illud dicimus carnem et ossa vel capillos, vel quodcunque conspicimus in homine, sed vi quidem atque potentia esse hontm singula, nondum vero visibililer appa­ rere : sic etiam juxta animat portionem, necdum quidem rationale ejus et irascibile et quaecunque de anima considerantur, locum in illo habere memora­ mus, proportionem vero formati corporis, et con­ summationem etiam simul effectus animre dicimus, cum subjecto proficimus.
But just as, in respect of the bodily portion, we do not call that flesh and bones or hairs, or whatever we behold in man, but say that these are each by force and potency, not yet however appearing visibly; so also in respect of the portion of the soul, we record that its rational and irascible part, and whatsoever things are considered concerning the soul, do not yet have place in it, but we say that the proportion of the formed body, and likewise the consummation of the effect of the soul, are wrought together, as we advance with the subject.
但正如就身體的部分而言,我們不稱那為肉與骨或毛髮,或我們在人身上所見的任何之物,乃說這些各是憑力量與潛能而在,尚未可見地顯出;照樣,就靈魂的部分而言,我們也記下:它的理性與激情的部分,並一切關乎靈魂所思想之事,尚未在其中佔有地位,乃說那被形成之身體的相應,以及靈魂之效果的完成,是隨著我們與這主體一同進展而被一同成就的。
9:255
Sic enim perfectus homo inter majores obtinet animae operationes effectum, in exordio sux constitutionis aptos et congruos in se præsenti usui animæ demonstrat adnisus, ut sibi per infusam materiam aplissimum domicilium formet. Nec enim possibile esse credimus in alienis ædificiis animam competenter inseri, sicut non potest impres­ sum ceræ signaculum alienae prorsus sculpturæ con­ gruenter aptari. Quemadmodum vero corpus ex parvo procedit ad id quod est perfectum, sic et operationes consertæ animæ subjectæ similiter concrescunt et proficiunt.
For thus the perfect man, among the greater operations of the soul, obtains the effect; at the outset of his constitution he displays in himself endeavours fit and suitable to the present use of the soul, so that through the infused matter he may form for himself a most fitting dwelling-place. For we do not believe it possible for the soul to be fitly inserted into alien buildings, just as the seal impressed upon wax cannot be fittingly fitted to a wholly alien carving. And as the body proceeds from the small to that which is perfect, so also the operations of the soul that is knit to it likewise grow together and advance.
因為完全的人就是這樣,在靈魂較大的運作之中得著其效果;在他受造之初,他便在自身中顯出適合且相宜於靈魂當前用途的努力,好叫他藉所注入的物質為自己形成一個最合宜的居所。因為我們不信靈魂能被恰當地置入外來的建築中,正如印在蠟上的印章,不能恰當地配合一個全然外來的雕刻。又正如身體由微小進到那完全的,照樣,與它相連之靈魂的運作,也同樣一同生長並進展。
9:256
Procedit quidem ca in prima constitutione, veluti quædam radix abdita cavis tantummodo quæ nutrimentis ac incrementis est distributa ( nec enim parvitas sumentis amplius recipit), deinde cun ad lucem prodicrit id quod insertum est germenquc pro­ tulerit : tunc in eo gratia sensibilis efflorescit, jam- que coalescens et in magnitudines competenter ex­ currens, veluti fructus quidam rationalis virtus inci­ pit elucere. Non enim omnis simul apparens, si curn instrumenti sui perfectione diligenter excrescens, tantumque semper fructificans, quantum capax est bubjecti potentia.
It proceeds indeed in its first constitution, like a certain hidden root distributed only to the hollows which are allotted to nourishments and increases (for the smallness of that which takes it in receives no more); then when that which is implanted comes forth to the light and has put forth its germ, then in it the grace of the senses blossoms; and now coalescing and competently running out into magnitudes, the rational power, like a certain fruit, begins to shine forth. For it does not all appear at once, but, carefully growing up together with the perfection of its instrument, ever bearing fruit so much as the potency of the subject is capable of.
它在最初的受造中固然如同某種隱藏的根,只被分配給那些撥歸滋養與增長的空處(因為那承受者的微小不能容納更多);然後當所植入之物出到光中、發出其萌芽時,感官之恩便在其中綻放;如今它既凝合並適度地伸展為一定的大小,那理性的能力便如同某種果實,開始發出光輝。因為它並非一時盡都顯現,乃是與其器官的完備一同細心地長大,常結果子,多少照那主體之潛能所能容納的而定。
9:257
Si vero in hac formatione corporis, operationes anianae fortassis inquiris, attende temet­ ipsum, sicut ait Moyses, et quasi in libro, sic histo­ riali operationis anianæ perleges; ipsa enim tibi na­ tura quodammodo fabulabitur omni usu sermonis . efficacius, varias in corpore occupationes animæ sive in anima, sive in universali, sive in particulari conditione demonstrans. Sed de nobis superfluum puto sermonibus agere, et vcluti quibusdam procul et extra terminos constitutis miracula consueta nar- rare. Quis enim se intuens verbis indigeat, quibus naturæ jura cognoscat?
But if, in this formation of the body, you perchance inquire after the operations of the soul, attend to yourself, as Moses says, and as in a book, so will you read through, as in a history, the operation of the soul; for nature itself will in a manner recount to you, more effectually than all use of speech, the various occupations of the soul in the body, whether in the soul, or in the universal, or in the particular condition. But concerning ourselves I think it superfluous to treat in discourses, and to narrate the accustomed marvels as it were to certain persons placed far off and beyond the bounds. For who, beholding himself, would have need of words by which to learn the laws of nature?
但若在身體的這形成過程中,你或許要探究靈魂的運作,那麼正如摩西所說,要留意你自己,如同在一卷書中,你便要讀過——彷彿讀一部歷史——靈魂的運作;因為本性自身要以某種方式向你述說,比一切言語的運用更為有效,把靈魂在身體中的種種活動向你顯明,無論是在靈魂中、在整體中、還是在個別的境況中。但論到我們自己,我認為以言辭討論,並彷彿向那些遠在界限之外的人講述慣常的奇事,乃是多餘的。因為人若注目於自己,何須言語才能認識本性的律則呢?
9:258
Est quippe facillimum, ut quis modum vitæ suæ considerans, et qualiter ad omnem vitalis operationis effectum opportunum cor­ pus gerat, expendens animadvertat, erga quid occu­ pata sit animæ primordialis seu potius germinalis ex vivente corpore detractum opificio naturæ deponitur; nam et fructuum interiora et radicum pullulamenta nondum privata vivacissimo vigore, quæ est eis insita per naturam, cum terrae committuntur, quamvis oc­ cultam, tamen mundam qualitatem conservant; talem vero vim at que potentiam non confert terra quæ continct, terra velut a semet extrinsecus largiens; alioquin et mortua ligna faceret germinarc:
For it is most easy that anyone, considering the manner of his own life, and how he bears a body opportune for every effect of vital operation, weighing it, should observe with what the primordial—or rather germinal—activity of the soul is occupied. And that which is drawn from the living body is laid down to the working of nature; for even the inward parts of fruits and the sproutings of roots, not yet deprived of the most lively vigour which is implanted in them by nature, when they are committed to the earth, preserve, though a hidden, yet a pure quality; but such force and potency the earth which contains them does not confer, as though the earth were bestowing it from itself extrinsically; otherwise it would make even dead wood to germinate.
因為人若思想自己生命的樣式,以及他如何承擔一個適於一切生命運作之效果的身體,加以衡量,便極易察見靈魂那原初的——或更該說是萌芽的——活動所專注的是甚麼。而那從活的身體中被抽取之物,乃被交付給本性的運作;因為連果實的內裡與根的萌蘖,在尚未喪失本性植於其中那最有生氣的活力時,當它們被交付於地,便保存著一種雖隱藏卻純淨的性質;但這樣的力量與潛能,並非那含藏它們的地所賦予,彷彿地是從自身向外施予的;不然,地就會使連枯死的木頭也發芽了。
9:259
sed quod est insitum producit ad lucem amore suo in modum B nutricis quod plantatum est in radice ad medullam et corticem ramosque perficiens : quod nequissel fieri. nisi aliqua conserta esset potentia naturalis, quæ co­ gnatam et congruam ex adjacentibus alimoniam tra­ hens, virgultum aut arborem aut spicam vel aliquid ex hujusmoJi rebus effecit. CAPUT XXXI. Contemplatio quædam medicinalis, potiusque de tor­ porum constructione, paucis absolvitur.
But that which is implanted brings itself forth to the light by its own love, after the manner of a nurse, perfecting that which is planted in the root, into the pith and bark and branches: which could not have come about, unless some natural potency had been knit in, which, drawing the kindred and suitable nourishment from the things lying near, produced the shrub or tree or ear of corn or something of such kinds. CHAPTER XXXI. A certain medical contemplation, or rather concerning the construction of bodies, is completed in few words.
但那所植入之物,憑自己的愛,如同乳母一般,把自己帶到光中,使那種在根中的,成全於髓、皮與枝:這事本不能成就,除非有某種本性的潛能被織入其中,這潛能從鄰近之物中汲取同類且合宜的養分,便產出灌木、或樹、或麥穗、或這類之物中的某樣。第三十一章。一段醫學的默觀,或更該說是關乎身體之構造的默觀,以寥寥數語完成。
9:260
Sed quamvis certissima corporis noslri formatione unusquisque a semctipso doceatur, ex quibus intelli­ git et vivit et sentit, naturam propriam habens ma­ gistram , tamen et ex libris sapientum , qui ista stu­ diosius scrutati sunt, fas est diligenter addiscerc. Non­ nulli namque qualiter positionis habeant singula quæ in nobis sunt, per eam quam medici dicunt anato­ miam, id est incisionem singulorum nodorum atque venarum, propter quod effectus in universa corporis membrorum interius et exterius contemplati sont, et aliis retulerunt, ita ut sufficiens huic humanæ insti­ tutioni cognitio studiosius existeret.
But although, by the most certain formation of our body, each person is taught by his very self—learning from those things by which he understands and lives and feels, having his own nature as his instructor—nevertheless it is also proper to learn diligently from the books of the wise, who have investigated these matters more studiously. For some have observed, through what physicians call anatomy (that is, the cutting-open of the several joints and veins), in what arrangement each of the things within us is disposed, and thereby they have contemplated the workings throughout the whole of the body's members, inwardly and outwardly, and have reported them to others, so that a knowledge sufficient for this study of human constitution might more diligently be available.
雖然每個人藉著我們身體最確切的構造,由自己本身受教——從那些他賴以理解、生活與感覺的事物中學習,以自己的本性為師——然而從智者的著作中勤勉地學習也是合宜的,因為他們更用心地探究了這些事物。有些人藉著醫生所稱的解剖學(即切開各個關節與血管),觀察我們體內各部分如何安置定位,並由此考察了全身肢體內外的種種功能,又將之傳述給他人,好使這人體構造之研究能更勤勉地獲得足夠的知識。
9:261
Si quis autem de his perquirit de nobis, profecto ei magisterium præ­ bebit Ecclesia. Hæc enim spiritualium lex est ovium, sicut Dominus ait, ut alienorum vocem non audiant. Unde sermonem breviter afferamus. Tria quædam de natura corporis intelligenda percepimus, quorum gratia singula quæ in nobis sunt constituta esse cer­ nuntur. Quadam namque propter vitam, quædam vero propter bonam vitam, quædam ad successionem posteritatis opportune formata sunt. Quaecunque igi­ tur in nobis talia dentur, sine quibus humana nequeat vita subsistere, hæc in tribus item partitis esse sen­ timus, id est in cerebro et corde et jecore;
But if anyone makes inquiry of us concerning these things, the Church will surely furnish him with instruction. For this is the law of the spiritual sheep, as the Lord says, that they should not hear the voice of strangers. Therefore let us bring forward our discourse briefly. We have perceived that three things are to be understood concerning the nature of the body, for the sake of which the several things within us are seen to have been established. For some have been suitably formed for life, some for a good life, and some for the succession of posterity. Whatsoever things, then, are given us of such a kind that without them human life cannot subsist—these we likewise perceive to reside in three distinct parts, that is, in the brain and the heart and the liver;
但若有人就這些事向我們查問,教會必定供應他教導。因為這正是屬靈羊群的律法,正如主所說的,叫牠們不聽陌生人的聲音。所以讓我們簡要地陳述我們的論述。我們已認識到,關於身體的本性有三件事須當明白,為了這三者的緣故,我們體內各部分才被看出是如此設立的。因為有些是為生命而合宜地構成,有些是為美好的生活,有些則是為後代的繁衍。凡賜給我們、若無它們人的生命便不能存續的事物,我們同樣察覺它們存在於三個不同的部位中,即腦、心與肝;
9:262
quacun­ que vero in angmentum bonorum largitate naturæ ad bene vivendum homini collata sunt, instrumentum sensuum esse declarantur. Hujusmodi quippe vitam quidem nostram lion continent, quia et deficientibus ex his sæpenumero quibusdam, nihilominus subest homini; sed impossibile est sine istis effectibus vitam suavissimam contineri. Tertia quoque divisionis in­ tentio consequenter respicit ad successionis officia.
but those things which, by the bounty of nature, have been bestowed upon man for an increase of goods, for living well, are shown to be the instruments of the senses. For things of this sort do not indeed sustain our life, since even when some of them are wanting—as often happens—man nonetheless still subsists; yet it is impossible that a most pleasant life should be maintained without these functions. The third aim of the division accordingly has regard to the offices of succession.
但那些憑著自然的慷慨、為增添美善、為美好生活而賜給人的事物,則被顯明為感官的器官。因為這一類事物實在並不維繫我們的生命,因為即使其中某些缺乏——這常常發生——人仍舊存活;然而沒有這些功能,至為愉悅的生活便不可能維持。因此這劃分的第三個目的,乃是顧及繁衍後代的職司。
9:263
Sunt autem et alia quiddam præter hæc, quæ ad per­ severantiam corporis communiter membris subjecta sunt omnibus, opcratioucs ex sc congruas afferentes, sicut venter et pulmo, hic quidem spiritu, quem sumit ac reddit cordi, signaculum perflans, ille vero cibos viscerihus in commune suscipiens.
There are, moreover, certain other things besides these, which, for the continuance of the body, are commonly subject to all the members, bringing forth operations of their own that befit them—such as the belly and the lung: the latter indeed by the breath which it takes and renders back to the heart, blowing through it as a seal; the former by receiving food into the inward parts for the common benefit.
此外,除這些之外還有某些別的事物,它們為了身體的存續而共同隸屬於一切肢體,發出各自合宜的功能——如腹與肺:後者藉著它所吸入又交還給心的氣息,如同印記般吹拂於其間;前者則藉著將食物接納入內臟,以供全身的共同利益。
9:264
Cum sic igitur formatio nostra dividatur, diligentius intuendum est, quod non simpliciter per unum aliquod membrum vis illa quæ ad vitam nostram pertinet transigatur, sed plurimis partibus occasiones nobis ad conservatio­ nem nostram natura distribuat necessaria ad univer­ sum corpus, ita ut quæcunque ad cautelam vitæ ac pulchritudinem eadem natura est molita, hæc videan­ tur esse quam plurima, multam adinvicem differen­ tiam prorsus habentia. Sed arbitror dividere prius oportere breviter prima principia quæ ad constitu­ tionem vitæ nostra pertinere monstrantur;
Since, therefore, our formation is thus divided, it must be more diligently considered that the force which pertains to our life is not carried on simply through some single member, but that nature distributes to us, through very many parts, the occasions for our preservation, things necessary to the whole body; so that whatever the same nature has contrived for the safeguard and the beauty of life, these appear to be very many, having altogether a great difference among themselves. But I think it proper first to divide briefly the first principles which are shown to pertain to the constitution of our life;
既然如此,我們的構造既這樣劃分,便當更勤勉地思想:那關乎我們生命的能力,並非單藉某一個肢體而運行,乃是自然藉許多部分為我們分配維護自身的條件,即全身所必需之物;以致那同一自然為了生命的保障與美好所經營的一切,顯出是極多的,彼此之間有著極大的差異。但我認為宜先簡要地劃分那些被顯明為關乎我們生命構造的首要原則;
9:265
materia vero totius corporis quæ communiter membris sin- gulis subjacet, nunc a nobis est reticenda, cum nihil ad præsens propositum, ad particularem contempla­ tionem universalis naturæ disputatio spectare videa­ tur. Cunctis ergo fatentibus omnium elementoruai quæ in hoc mundo sunt in nobis existere portionem, calidi scilicet ac frigidi, necnon et alterius conjuga­ tionis, quæ in humore ac siccitate consistit, de sin­ gulis a nobis est utiq e disserendum. Perspicimus itaque tres esse dispensatorias vitæ potentias, qua­ rum una quidem universum mundum calore proprio refovet, altera vero madefacta humore quod calore confectum est, ita ut æqua temperie anima!
while the matter of the whole body, which commonly underlies each of the members, must for now be passed over in silence by us, since the discussion concerning the universal nature, in respect to a particular contemplation, seems to have nothing to do with our present purpose. Since, then, all confess that there exists in us a portion of all the elements which are in this world—namely of the hot and the cold, and also of the other pairing, which consists in moisture and dryness—we must by all means treat of each. We perceive, therefore, that there are three powers that administer life, of which one indeed warms the whole world with its own heat; another, made moist by humour, tempers what has been wrought by heat, so that with an even balance the soul
至於那共同承載各肢體的全身質料,我們此刻當保持緘默,因為關於普遍本性的討論,就一個別的考察而言,似乎與我們眼下的目的毫不相干。既然眾人都承認,凡此世界中所有元素,在我們身上都有其一份——即熱與冷,以及另一對配合,存乎濕與乾——我們便必須逐一論述。因此我們察覺有三種掌管生命的能力,其中之一以自身的熱溫暖整個世界;另一則被濕潤所沾濕,調和那由熱所造成的,使靈魂以均衡的調劑
9:266
in medio ex contraria qualitate servetur, quatenus nec humo­ rem desugat caloris abundantia, nec calorem copia humoris exstinguat. Vis autem tertia per semetipsam juxta quamdam congruentiam atque modulat onem Membra quæ distincta sunt continet, suis ea co­ aptans vinculis, et omnihus prærogans per sese mobilem spontancamque virtutem, quæ si desit, solutum et immobile corpus existit, ultronca spiritus vivacitate atque efficientia destitutum, magisque prius artificium atque molimen nostræ natune in ipsa corporis conditione dignum est in­ turri.
be preserved in the midst, by the contrary quality, so that neither does an abundance of heat dry up the moisture, nor a plenty of moisture extinguish the heat. But the third power, of itself, according to a certain fittingness and modulation, holds together the members which have been made distinct, fitting them with their own bonds, and conferring upon them all of itself a mobile and spontaneous force—which, if it be lacking, the body stands loosened and immovable, deprived of the unbidden vivacity and efficiency of the spirit. And rather is the prior craftsmanship and contrivance of our nature, in the very fashioning of the body, worthy to be gazed upon.
得以居中保存,藉著相反的性質,以致熱的豐盈既不使濕氣枯乾,濕的充沛也不熄滅熱。而第三種能力,憑其自身,按某種恰當的調配與調節,將那已被分別的肢體聯結在一起,以各自的繫帶將它們配合,並從自身賦予它們一切可動而自發的力量——這力量若缺乏,身體便鬆弛不動地存立,喪失了那氣息不受催促的生氣與效能。我們本性在身體構造之初的這先在的工巧與經營,更是值得凝視的。
9:267
Quia enim omne quod durum est sensibiles efficientias omnino non recipit, sicuti videmus in ossi­ bus nostris et in frutetis atque arboribus, in quibus vitæ quideu) species quædam cernitur, in eo quod nutritur et crescit, nec tamen admittit ullum sensum subjecti durities. Ilujus rei gratia oportebat quam­ dam tormationem instar ceræ mollis in sensuum operatione supponi, quæ pos, ct occurrentibus formis imprimi, neque nimio humore resolvi. Non enim po­ test in humido quod imprimitur perdurare, neque duritia nimis rigida (quia quod nescit cedere, imagi­ nem nequit impressione excipere).
For since everything that is hard does not at all receive sensible operations—as we see in our bones and in shrubs and trees, in which indeed a certain species of life is discerned, in that they are nourished and grow, yet the hardness of the subject admits no sense whatever—on account of this it was necessary that a certain formation, after the manner of soft wax, be supplied for the operation of the senses, which might both be impressed by the forms that meet it, and not be dissolved by excessive moisture. For that which is impressed cannot endure in what is moist, nor in a hardness too rigid (because that which knows not how to yield cannot receive an image by impression).
因為凡是堅硬之物全然不接受感官的功能——正如我們在自己的骨頭,以及在灌木與樹木中所見的,其中固然辨得出某種生命的形態,因它們得養分而生長,然而所承載者的堅硬卻不容許任何感覺——為此緣故,便必須為感官的運作預備一種如同軟蠟的構造,使它既能被臨到的形相所印刻,又不致被過度的濕氣所溶解。因為被印刻者在濕潤中不能持久,在過於僵硬的堅硬中也不能(因為那不懂得退讓的,便不能藉印刻而承受形像)。
9:268
Sed inter has hæsit Inedia quædam inter flaccescentem, sive ac ri­ gentem, ne optimis potentiæ motibus, dico sensibili­ bus, animal orbaretur. Quoniam igitur quod molle est et facile, nisi rerum solidarum cooperatione firmetur, profecto immobile atque indistinctum est, juxta ens quos pulmones marinos vocant, idcirco robur ossium corpori natura permiscuit, quæ invicem per concor­ dem modulationem copulans, penitus nervorum nexi­ bus compages eorum juncturasque constrinxit, et ita eis modum sensibili vigore immiscuit, carne paulo duriore superflciem quæ passiones ferret involvens.
But there stood a certain mean between these, between the flaccid and the rigid, lest the animal should be bereft of the best motions of the power—I mean the sensible ones. Since, therefore, that which is soft and yielding, unless it be made firm by the co-operation of solid things, is assuredly immovable and undistinguished—like those which they call sea-lungs—therefore nature mingled the strength of bones into the body, which, coupling them mutually by a concordant modulation, bound fast their frameworks and junctures deep within by the bindings of the sinews, and thus mingled into them a measure of sensible vigour, wrapping the surface that should bear the passions with somewhat harder flesh.
但在這二者之間立有某種中道,介乎鬆軟與僵硬之間,免得動物被剝奪了那能力中最佳的運動——我是指感官的運動。既然柔軟而易屈之物,若非藉堅固之物的協作而得堅實,必定是不動而無分別的——如同他們所謂的海肺——所以自然便把骨的力量摻入身體,藉著協調的調節將它們彼此相連,又用筋的繫結在深處將它們的構架與接合牢牢縛住,如此把一份可感的活力摻入其中,並用稍硬的肉包裹那當承受感受的表面。
9:269
Huic igitur ossium naturae solidissimæ, veluti quibus­ dam columnis molem sustinentibus totius corporis onus imposuit. Nec indivisa aut indiscreta abique eadem ossa compegit, alioquin immobilis et sine operatione mansisset, et si ita fuisset homo formatus, veluti quædam arbor in uno loco consistens, cum nec alterna crurum motione in anteriora procederet, nec manuum ministerio vitæ ejus commoditas appareret. Nunc autem gressuum et actuum hac provisione for­ matum est instrumentum, ut spontanco spiritu qui nervis insertus est, ultronci motus corporci confe­ rantur. Hinc administratio manuum varia atque mul.
Upon this most solid nature of the bones, then, as upon certain pillars sustaining the mass, He laid the burden of the whole body. Nor did He frame the bones everywhere undivided or undistinguished and the same; otherwise the body would have remained immovable and without operation, and if man had been so fashioned, like some tree standing fast in one place, since he would neither advance forward by the alternating motion of the legs, nor would the convenience of his life appear through the service of the hands. But now the instrument of steps and of actions has been fashioned by this provision, so that by the spontaneous spirit which is inserted into the sinews, the unbidden bodily motions might be conferred. Hence the management of the hands, various and manifold,
於是在這骨頭至為堅固的本性之上,如同在承載重物的柱子上,祂安放了全身的重擔。祂也沒有把骨頭處處造成不分割、不分別而劃一的;不然身體便會保持不動而無作為,而人若被這樣造成,便如同某棵固立一處的樹,既不能藉雙腿交替的運動向前邁進,也不能藉雙手的服事顯出其生活的便利。但如今步行與行動的器官藉這安排被造成,使那插入筋中的自發氣息得以賦予不受催促的身體運動。由此而有雙手的運用,多樣而繁複,
9:270
tiplex et accommodatissima ad omne prorsus exco­ gitantis offcium, hinc cervicis inflexio, ct capitis inclinatio atque erectio, et circa mentum efficientia quædam, palpebrarum quoque collectio, simul cum intellectu proveniens cæterorum. Quoniam etiam motus ipse membrorum nervis cxtendentibus ac re­ laxantibus, veluti quibusdam machinis operatur im­ pulsus, potestas autem per hæc vi sua nitens spon­ taneum gcrit imperium, ac voluntario spiritu juxta quamdam naturæ dispensationem in singulis proprium demonstrat effectum. Radicem igitur atque princi­ pium omnium motuum qui per nervos effici credun­ tur, membranam illam qua cerebrum continetur com­ pactum nervis esse perclaruit.
and most suited to every office whatsoever of the contriving mind; hence the bending of the neck, and the inclination and raising of the head, and a certain efficiency about the chin, also the closing of the eyelids, occurring together with the intellect of the rest. Since, too, the very motion of the members works by the sinews stretching and relaxing—as it were by certain engines driving the impulses—while the power, straining through these by its own force, exercises a spontaneous command, and by the voluntary spirit, according to a certain dispensation of nature, displays its proper effect in each part. It has been made most clear, therefore, that the root and principle of all the motions which are believed to be effected through the sinews is that membrane by which the brain is held compacted with sinews.
且至為適合那謀劃之心智的一切職司;由此而有頸的彎曲,頭的俯仰與昂起,下巴某種的功能,眼瞼的閉合,這一切都伴隨著對其餘部分的理智一同產生。又因為肢體的運動本身乃藉筋的伸張與鬆弛而作工——彷彿藉某些機械推動那衝力——而那能力藉這些以自身之力施力,運使一種自發的命令,並藉自願的氣息,按自然某種的安排,在各部分顯出其本有的效用。因此極其顯明,凡被認為藉筋而成就的一切運動,其根源與本原乃是那以筋密合包裹腦的膜。
9:271
Non igitur arbitramur jam curiosius nos debere perquirere de effectu mem­ brorum animalis, cum hujuscemodi motus sit in ce­ rebri formatione declaratus. Quod autem maximus vigor ad tuendam vitam nobis a cerebro conferatur, ex conlrario accidenti evidenter agnoscitur. Nam si vulnus aliquod vel scissuram membrana ipsa pertulerit, illico mors insequitur. Passioni quippe cum illato vulneri nec ad punctum temporis natura possit ob­ sistere, sed veluti fundamento quodam subrupto totum simul ædificium cum parte dejicitur, ejus ergo passionem totius corporis sequitur manifesta perni­ cies : in hoc propriæ vitae causam subesse nullo pacto negandum est.
We do not think, therefore, that we ought now to inquire more curiously concerning the operation of the members of the animal, since a motion of this sort has been declared to lie in the formation of the brain. And that the greatest vigour for guarding our life is conferred upon us from the brain, is evidently recognized from the contrary accident. For if that membrane has sustained any wound or rupture, death immediately follows. Since indeed nature cannot withstand the suffering, with the wound inflicted, even for a point of time, but, as it were with some foundation undermined, the whole edifice at once falls together with the part—therefore manifest destruction of the whole body follows upon its suffering: that the cause of our proper life resides in this can by no means be denied.
因此我們認為,如今不該再更繁瑣地探究動物肢體的功能,因為這一類的運動既已被宣明為存於腦的構造中。又那守護我們生命的最大活力是由腦賦予我們的,這從相反的事例中顯然可知。因為那膜若受了任何傷口或裂痕,死亡便立即隨之而至。因為自然在傷口造成後,連片刻也不能抵擋那損傷,乃是如同某根基被挖空,整座建築連同那部分一同立時傾倒——所以全身明顯的毀滅便隨其損傷而來:本有生命的緣由存於此處,斷不可否認。
9:272
Cum vero et cornm quæ desinunt vi­ vere, restringitur naturæ insitus calor, et ita quod mortuum est frigescit, necesse est talem causam nobis etiam in calore subsistere, qui cum desit profecto mors sequitur, et idco caloris præsentia animal vivere confitendum est. Hujus autem vis atque potentia, tanquam fontem qucmdam atque principium cor esse perspeximus, ex quo in modum listularum multipli­ ces venæ per omne corpus calidum spiritum ferven­ temque diffundunt.
But since, in the case of those who cease to live, nature's innate heat is curtailed, and thus what is dead grows cold, it must needs be that such a cause subsists for us also in heat, which, when it is wanting, death assuredly follows; and therefore by the presence of heat the animal is to be acknowledged to live. And the force and power of this heat we have perceived to be the heart, as it were a certain fountain and principle, out of which, after the manner of pipes, manifold veins diffuse the hot and seething spirit throughout the whole body.
但既然在那些停止生存者身上,自然所固有的熱被削減,如此凡死了的便變冷,那麼這樣的緣由也必然在熱中為我們存立,這熱一旦缺乏,死亡必定隨之而來;因此藉著熱的臨在,當承認動物乃是活的。我們又察覺這熱的力量與能力乃是心,彷彿某個源頭與本原,從其中如同管道一般,眾多的血管將又熱又沸騰的氣息布滿全身。
9:273
Et quoniam oportebat cibum quo que quemdam calori semper a natura largiri, quia fas non est ignem ad sese durare, nisi congruis pasca­ tur alimentis, idcirco rivi sanguinis tanquam de fonte quodam jecoris calore spiritus excitantur, et ubique simul per omne corpus excurrunt, ne alterum deso­ letur ab attero, et tali initio natura depravetur. Hoc ipsum vero doccat abstinentes materiæ ipsius æqua­ litate formatos, quod avaritia quædam corruptiva sit passio, et quia sine ulla indigentia est sola Divinitas; nam paupertas humana indiget his quæ suam viden­ tur substantiam continere.
And since it was needful that some nourishment also be ever supplied by nature to the heat—because it is not possible for fire to endure of itself unless it be fed with fitting aliment—therefore rivulets of blood, as from some fountain of the liver, are stirred up by the heat of the spirit, and run everywhere at once throughout the whole body, lest one part be left desolate by another and nature by such a beginning be corrupted. And let this very thing teach the abstinent, who are formed in the equability of that same matter, that a certain greed is a corrupting passion, and that the Divinity alone is without any want; for human poverty stands in need of those things which seem to maintain its substance.
又既然需要自然也常以某種食物供給那熱——因為火若不以合宜的養料餵養,便不可能自存——所以血的細流,如從肝這某個源頭,被氣息的熱所激動,並同時遍流全身各處,免得一部分被另一部分撇下荒涼,自然因這樣的開端而敗壞。願這事教導那些禁戒之人——他們在同一質料的均勻中受造——使他們知道:某種貪婪乃是敗壞人的情慾,唯獨神性是毫無缺乏的;因為人的貧乏需要那些看似維繫其本質的事物。
9:274
Idcirco tribus his potentiis quibus universum corpus gubernari prædiximus, in­ fluente extrinsecus materiam natura dispensat diver­ sis tramitibus, id quod singulis congruit admini­ strans. Nam fonti sanguinis qui est jecur escarum distributionem contulit. Quidquid autem tali provi­ sione sua semper ingecit ad jecoris fontes, item præ­ parat ex jecore derivari.
Therefore, to these three powers by which we have said before that the whole body is governed, nature, with matter flowing in from without, dispenses by diverse channels, administering that which befits each. For to the fountain of blood, which is the liver, it has assigned the distribution of food. And whatever by such providence of hers it has ever cast in to the fountains of the liver, this likewise it makes ready to be derived from the liver.
因此,對於我們先前所說全身藉以受治理的這三種能力,自然以從外流入的質料,藉不同的途徑加以分配,運送各自所宜的。因為對血的源頭——即肝——它委以食物的分配。而凡它憑其這樣的眷顧不斷投入肝之諸源的,它同樣預備使其從肝而引出。
9:275
Quemadmodum si nix in montibus humore suo subjectos augeat fontes, et per altum ad inferiores venas liquorem proprium depri­ mit, cordis autem perflatio vicini membri submi­ nistratur effectu, quod appellatur quidem pulmo, est autem aeris exceptorium per insitam arteriam quæ ad os usque pertingit, flatum extrinsecus ducens, in medioque cor positum instar ignis, qui in mptu ver­ satur et operatione continua, et ipsum sine cessa- tione movetur atque operatur, et siculi fabrorum folles efficiunt, pertrahit ad semet ex adjacenle spi­ ritu compressiones, extensionibus replens, et quod in se est igneum arteriis adjacentibus refovens, et hæc facere non quiescit, id quidem quod extrinsecus est per resurrectionem ac respirationem ad sese trahens, quod.
Just as if snow upon the mountains should augment with its moisture the fountains lying below, and press down its own liquor through the deep to the lower veins. But the heart's ventilation is supplied by the operation of a neighbouring member, which indeed is called the lung, and is a receptacle of air through the implanted windpipe which reaches as far as the mouth, drawing the breath in from without; and the heart, set in the midst like a fire, which is engaged in motion and continual operation, is itself moved and operates without ceasing; and, as bellows of smiths do, it draws to itself from the adjacent spirit compressions, filling itself by expansions, and rekindling the fire that is within it by the adjacent arteries; and it does not cease to do this—drawing to itself what is without by a kind of rising-again and re-breathing, while that
正如山上的雪以其濕氣增添下方的諸源,並使自己的液體沿著深處下壓至較低的血管。而心的通風則由一鄰近肢體的運作所供應,這肢體名叫肺,是藉那直達口部、所植入的氣管而成的空氣容器,從外引入氣息;而心如同火般置於其間,從事於運動與持續的運作,本身也不止息地被推動、運作;又如鐵匠的風箱所為,它從鄰近的氣息把壓縮吸入自身,藉伸張將自己充滿,並藉鄰近的動脈重新點燃其內的火;它行此不止——藉一種復起與再呼吸把外界之物吸向自身,而那
9:276
autem circum se est, per compressionem ipsis arteriis interserens, quod mihi videtur et hujusmodi spontanei flatus hanc nobis causam sine cessatione subsistere. Saepe denique mens in aliis occupatur et omnimodo conquiescit, in somnunj corpore resoluto, flatus tamen qui ducitur ex aere quiescere non No-. test, nec aliquantulum quidem, cooperante in hoc ipsum spontaneæ voluntatis arbitrio.
which is about itself it inserts by compression into the arteries themselves—which seems to me to be also the cause why this kind of spontaneous breath subsists for us without ceasing. For often the mind is occupied in other things and altogether rests quiet, the body being relaxed into sleep; yet the breath which is drawn from the air cannot rest, not even a little, with the choice of spontaneous will co-operating in this very thing.
圍繞自身之物,則藉壓縮送入動脈本身——這在我看來也正是何以這種自發的呼吸在我們身上無休止地存立的緣由。因為心智時常忙於別的事而完全安靜歇息,身體鬆弛入睡;然而那從空氣引來的氣息卻不能停歇,連片刻也不能,雖然自發意志的抉擇並未在這事上協作。
9:277
Opinor enim quia cor pulmone convolutum atque circumdatum ei posteriori sui parte respirationibus et compressio­ nibus suis membrum moveat, et attractionem aeris emissionemque ipsi pulmoni machinetur, qui rarissi­ mus atque multicavus omnia sua veluti foramina ad fundum atque summitatem arteriæ patefacta retinet, et coarctatus quidem necessario spiritum qui in suis residet finibus elicit, cedens autem atque rarescens, rursusque attrahens aerem per distantiam movetur; et hujus non voluntariæ respirationis hæc causa est? quod id quod in nobis ignoum est atque fervidum quietum esse non possit.
For I am of opinion that the heart, wrapped about and surrounded by the lung, moves that member in its hinder part by its respirations and compressions, and contrives for the lung itself the attraction and emission of air; which lung, being most rarefied and full of many cavities, keeps all its openings, as it were, laid open at the bottom and at the top of the windpipe, and being compressed, of necessity expels the spirit that resides within its bounds, but yielding and rarefying, and again drawing in air, is moved through the interval. And this is the cause of this involuntary respiration: that that which is fiery and seething within us cannot be at rest.
因為我認為心被肺包裹環繞,藉其呼吸與壓縮在後部牽動那肢體,並為肺本身謀劃空氣的吸入與排出;這肺至為稀疏且多孔,使其一切的孔道彷彿在氣管的底端與頂端敞開,受壓縮時便必然排出存於其界內的氣息,而當它退讓、變稀,又重新吸入空氣,便藉這間隔而被牽動。這非自願呼吸的緣由乃是:我們內裡那火熱沸騰之物不能安息。
9:278
Nam quia proprium caloris est operatio motus, hujus autem principium in corde esse perspeximus, ut quod juge in hoc agitationis est, indesinentem aeris attractionem emissionemque per officium pulmonis operatur, propterea si quando contra naturam calor excrescit, flatus eorum qui fe­ hribus creber efficitur, veluti properante corde su­ perpositam sibi flammam novi spiritus continuatione restringere.
For since the proper operation of heat is motion, and we have perceived the principle of this to be in the heart, so that what is continually in agitation in this organ effects, through the office of the lung, the unceasing attraction and emission of air; therefore, if ever heat grows beyond nature, the breath of those who suffer fever becomes more frequent, as though the heart, hastening, were striving to curb the flame set upon it by the continuance of fresh breath.
因為熱的本有運作乃是運動,而我們既察覺其本原在於心,以致在這器官中持續攪動的,便藉肺的職司成就空氣不止息的吸入與排出;因此,每當熱超乎自然地增長,發熱之人的氣息便變得更為急促,彷彿心匆忙地藉新氣息的接連而努力抑制那加於其上的火焰。
9:279
Sed quoniam pauperrima quædam nostra natura est, et omnibus quæ ad suam constitutionem pertinent indigens, non solum proprii aeris ac spiri­ tus penuriam patitur (nam flatus qui calorem fovet internum, ad animalis conservationem jugiter extrin­ secus influit), sed etiam alimentorum subsidia quæ corporis pondus allevent, exterius sibi providenter accommodat, idcirco cibis et potibus indigentiam suam supplere contendit, appetitoriam quamdam vim ejus rei quæ deest, et expulsoriam ejus quæ superfluit corporibus inserens, nec minimam per hoc naturæ cooperationem ad fovendum cordis incen- dium præstans.
But since our nature is something most poor, and needy of all things that pertain to its own constitution, it not only suffers a lack of its own air and spirit (for the breath which fosters the inward heat ever flows in from without unto the preservation of the animal), but also providently fits to itself from without the supports of nourishment which may relieve the body's burden; therefore it strives to supply its want by foods and drinks, implanting in bodies a certain appetitive force for that which is lacking, and an expulsive force for that which is superfluous, and thereby furnishing no small co-operation of nature toward fostering the heart's burning.
但既然我們的本性極為貧乏,缺乏一切關乎自身構造的事物,它不僅缺乏自身的空氣與氣息(因為那滋養內熱的氣息常從外流入,以保存動物),也眷顧地從外為自己配備養料的支援,以減輕身體的重擔;因此它努力以飲食補足自己的缺乏,在身體中植入一種對所缺之物的渴求之力,與對所多餘之物的排除之力,並藉此為滋養心的燃燒提供不小的自然協作。
9:280
Nam quia talium, membrorum magis proprium cor esse retulimus, iuxta redditam superius rationem, quod, singula spiritus sui calore confoveat, ideo per omnia illud efficacissimum formator noster instituit, ut nulla pars otiosa vel vacans ad dispensa­ tione totius corporis approbetur, et post tergum quidem suum pulmonem per continuum motum ad se pertrahens, aditus ejus expandit ad susceptionem aeris, rursumque deprimens efflari quod receptum est præparat, in anteriora vero sua ventri penitus imminens calefacit illum, et ad operationes proprias habilem reddit, non ad resumptionem spiritus exci­ tans, sed ad exceptionem. cibi sibimet competentis impellens.
For since we have reported that the heart is more peculiarly the chief of such members, according to the reason rendered above—namely that it cherishes each thing by the heat of its own spirit—therefore our Former has appointed it most efficient in all respects, so that no part may be approved as idle or empty in the dispensation of the whole body: and behind its back indeed it draws the lung to itself by continual motion, and spreads open its passages for the reception of air, and again pressing it down prepares to breathe out what has been received; while in its forward parts, pressing close upon the belly, it heats it and renders it apt for its proper operations—not rousing it to the resumption of spirit, but impelling it to the reception of the food befitting it.
因為我們既已陳述心更特別地是這類肢體之首,按上面所述的理由——即它以自身氣息的熱溫養各部分——所以我們的塑造者立它在各方面為最有效能的,使在全身的安排中沒有任何部分被判為閒置或空虛:在其背後,它藉持續的運動把肺吸向自身,張開肺的通道以接納空氣,又重新將其壓下,預備呼出所接納的;而在其前部,緊貼著腹,它溫熱腹並使腹適於其本有的運作——不是激動腹去重取氣息,而是推動它去接納適合它的食物。
9:281
Proxime vero, junguntur introitus escæ ac spiritus, iii longum protenduntur alter ad alterum, æquaque mensura superiori termino dirimuntur, ita tamen ut copulentur invicem, et uno aditus ore clau­ dantur. Unde ille quidem escæ, hic autem spiritus ingressus efficitur, sed in altis efficitur recessibus viscerum, nequaquam iste conjugationis aditus con. sertus per omnia perseverat, nam in medio utriusque fine cor positum ille quidem afflatum, hinc alter ad recipiendum cibum tribuit, facultatem sui, apte vero natura ignea materiam quam consumat inquirit, qupd etiam circa ciborum susceptorem ventrem ne­ cessario producit.
Very near to each other are joined the entrances of food and of spirit; they are stretched out lengthwise the one toward the other, and are separated by an equal measure at the upper boundary, yet so that they are coupled together and are closed by one mouth of entrance. Whence the entrance of food is effected by the one, and of spirit by the other; but in the deep recesses of the inward parts this conjoined passage by no means continues knit together throughout, for the heart, set in the midst of the boundary of both, grants to the one breath, and to the other its faculty for receiving food; while the fiery nature, fittingly, seeks out matter which it may consume, which it necessarily produces also around the belly, the receiver of foods.
食物與氣息的入口彼此緊鄰相接;它們縱向地一個朝向另一個延伸,在上端以相等的距離分開,卻又彼此相連,並由一個入口之口閉合。由此食物的進入藉這一個而成,氣息的進入藉那一個而成;但在內臟的深處,這相連的通道絕不全程保持結合,因為心既置於二者交界之中,便將氣息給予這一個,又將接納食物的功能給予另一個;而那火熱的本性則合宜地尋求它可消耗的質料,它也必然在那接納食物的腹的周圍產生此事。
9:282
In quantum namque igneus vici­ nitate calpris efficitur, in tantuni magis cibos qui ca­ lorem nutriant semper exposcit. Hujus autem deside­ rium congruentius appetitum vocamus. Si vero sufficientem materiam venter acceperil, nec sic qui­ dem ignis operatio conquiescit.
For in so far as it is made fiery by the nearness of heat, in so much the more does it ever demand foods that may nourish the heat. And the desire of this we more fittingly call appetite. But if the belly should receive sufficient matter, not even thus does the operation of the fire rest quiet.
因為它越是因熱的鄰近而變得火熱,便越發不斷地索求那能滋養熱的食物。我們更合宜地把這渴求稱為食慾。但腹即使接納了足夠的質料,火的運作也並不因此安息。
9:283
Nam quemadmodum in conflatorio coadunationem quamdam totius mate­ riæ perficit, resolvensque universa atque permiscens, veluti excolatorio quodam ad subsequentes refundit aditus, dein grossiorem partem a sinceriore discer­ nens, tenuiorem quidem substantiam per quosdam tramites ad jecoris deducit ingressus, limosam vero fæculentiam ad latiores intestinorum aditus tradit, quam multiplicibus voluminibus versans non parvo tempore cibpm in visceribus retinet, uti ne recto cursu facilius pulsum mox aniinal appetitum edendi commoveat, et juxta naturam irrationabilium, nun­ quam homo ab hac occupatione desistat.
For just as in a smelting-furnace it effects a certain coalescing of the whole matter, and dissolving and intermingling all things, refunds it, as through a certain strainer, to the passages that follow; then, separating the coarser part from the purer, it leads the finer substance through certain channels to the entrances of the liver, but the muddy sediment it delivers to the broader passages of the intestines—which, turning it about in manifold convolutions, it retains the food in the bowels for no short time, lest, driven by a direct course, the food too easily and soon move the animal's appetite for eating, and, after the manner of the irrational creatures, man should never desist from this occupation.
因為正如在熔爐中,它使全部質料某種融合,並溶解、混合萬物,又如藉某個篩濾器將其輸往隨後的通道;然後將較粗的部分與較純的分開,把較細的物質藉某些渠道引向肝的入口,卻把泥渣般的沉澱送往腸的較寬通道——它以繁複的迴轉翻動這沉澱,把食物在內臟中保留不短的時間,免得食物被直線的行程驅趕,過於容易又迅速地激起動物進食的慾望,以致人如同無理性的生物,永不止息於這占據。
9:284
Et quoniam jecori maxime caloris cooperatip esse necessaria probatur, ut humor verteretur in sanguinem, hoc au- tem membrum a corde juxta positionem intervallo num minimo disparatur (nec etenim reor fuisse pos­ sibile ut pr.ncipium quoddam atque radix vitalis potentiæ alterius angustaretur vicinitate principii), ne quid tamen in dispensatione corporis per distan­ tiam calidæ substantiae peccaretur, trames nervosus quem arteriam hi qui circa istam sunt prudentes ap­ pellant, excipiens a corde ferventem spiritum perdu­ cit ad jecur, illicque juxta aditum quo humida reci­ piuntur adnexus, et calefaciens eamdem humidam substantiam, aliquid ei continuato calore igniti vigoris interserit.
And since the co-operation of heat is proved to be most necessary to the liver, that the moisture might be turned into blood, while this member is separated from the heart by no very small interval according to its position (for I do not think it would have been possible that one principle and root of the vital power should be straitened by the nearness of another principle)—yet, lest anything in the dispensation of the body should be marred by the distance of the hot substance, a sinewy channel, which those skilled about this matter call the artery, receiving from the heart the seething spirit, conducts it to the liver, and there, annexed near the entrance by which the moist things are received, and heating that same moist substance, inserts into it something of igneous vigour by continued heat.
又既然熱的協作被證明對肝至為必要,好使濕氣化為血,而這肢體按其位置與心相隔的距離並不甚小(因為我認為,生命力的某一本原與根,不可能被另一本原的鄰近所局促)——然而,免得身體的安排因熱物質的距離而有所損壞,便有一條筋質的渠道,精通此事者稱之為動脈,從心接受那沸騰的氣息,導向肝,並在那裡接連於接納濕物的入口附近,溫熱那同一濕的物質,藉持續的熱把某種燃燒的活力注入其中。
9:285
llinc species sanguinis rubro calore resper­ gitur, exinde vero connexi gemini quidem rivuli in modum fistularum proprium singuli receptant, ille quidem spiritum, hic autem sanguinem, quo lapsu facili humida substantia motu caloris excurrat. Et recreato per totum corpore, multipliciter disseminc­ tur in plura rivulorum principia, quæ sunt per omne corpus inscissa, permixta vero simul vitalium poten­ tiarum duo principia, sive quod calorem, seu quod humorem per corpus ubique diffundunt, velut atiquod vectigal de suis necessarium, eique principaliter in vitali jugo præminet, administrant.
Hence the appearance of blood is suffused with a ruddy heat; and thence two connected rivulets, in the manner of pipes, each receive their own—the one indeed spirit, the other blood—whereby the moist substance, by the motion of heat, may run forth with an easy gliding. And when the whole body has been refreshed, it is disseminated manifoldly into many beginnings of rivulets, which are cut through the whole body; and the two principles of the vital powers, intermingled together—whether that which diffuses heat, or that which diffuses moisture throughout the body everywhere—administer, as it were a certain necessary tribute of their own, and that which holds the chief place principally in the vital yoke.
由此血的色相被一種紅潤的熱所遍染;從那裡又有兩條相連的細流,如同管道一般,各自接受其所有——這一條接受氣息,那一條接受血——使那濕的物質藉熱的運動以輕易的滑流奔流而出。當全身被滋潤後,它便繁複地散布為許多細流的端頭,遍布並切貫全身;而生命力的兩個本原彼此交融——無論是那散布熱的,還是那遍體散布濕的——便如同各自某種必需的貢賦,又把在生命之軛中居首者,作為主要者加以運送供給。
9:286
Hæc autem vis in membranis cerebri esse conspicitur, ex qua omnium motus articulorum conglobatio totiusque ultronei spiritus vigor singulis membris inspersus efficacem ac sese moventem terrenam nostram statuam es aliqua machinatione demonstrat. Nam caloris quod est. mundissimum, et humoris quod tenuissimum est, per utramque vim admixtione quadam ac temperatione coadunata cerebrum nutriunt ac reforvent per vapo­ res, ex quo rursus ad id quod est purius exhalitio tenuata peronget membra; nam illa cerebro conti­ nentur, quæ etiam de superioribus.
But this force is beheld to reside in the membranes of the brain, from which the motion of all the joints, the gathering-together, and the vigour of the whole unbidden spirit, sprinkled into the several members, shows our earthen statue to be efficacious and self-moving by some contrivance. For that of heat which is most pure, and that of moisture which is most fine, by a certain mingling and tempering of both powers united together, nourish and re-warm the brain through vapours, from which again a thinned exhalation passes on to the members toward that which is purer; for those things are contained in the brain which also from the higher parts
但這力量被看出存於腦的諸膜中,從那裡,一切關節的運動、那聚合、以及散入各肢體的全部不受催促之氣息的活力,顯出我們這土造的塑像藉某種設計而有效能、能自我運動。因為熱中最純的與濕中最細的,藉兩種能力某種交融與調和而合一,便藉蒸氣滋養並重新溫養腦,從那裡,被稀薄化的呼氣又向那更純者通往各肢體;因為那些事物含於腦中,這些也從更高的部分
9:287
in profundum in modum fistulæ pertingens, et per juncturam conse­ quentes sese atque insertam sibi medullam prorsus extendens, in finem totius spinæ dorsi desinte, ac deinde ossibus atque nervis nec non compagum ac medullarum Frineipiis veluti quidam auriga præsi­ dens, singulis ad stationem vel motum virtutem im­ petumque largitur. Idcirco mibi videtur et certius accepisse munimen. Num in capite quidem duplicibus ossibus probatur esse circumdata, in nodis autem vel in eminentiis costarum atque multiplicibus vix for­ ma complexionibus insuper omni stabilitate serva- tur per eamdem custodiam qua continetur id quod tertium est obtinens.
reach down into the depth in the manner of a pipe, and, extending itself altogether through the joints that follow it and the marrow inserted into it, ends at the extremity of the whole spine of the back; and then, presiding over the bones and sinews, and likewise over the principles of the frames and the marrows, as it were some charioteer, it bestows upon each the power and impulse toward standing still or moving. Therefore it seems to me also to have received a surer fortification. For in the head indeed it is shown to be surrounded by double bones, but in the knots, or in the eminences of the ribs, and by the manifold, hardly shaped interlacings, it is moreover preserved in all stability by that same guardianship by which is held that which, holding the third place, is contained therein.
如同管道般深入下達,並全然藉著隨它而連續的關節與插入其中的骨髓延展自身,終於整條脊背的末端;然後,它如同某個御者,主宰著骨與筋,並同樣主宰著構架與骨髓的諸本原,賦予每一部分趨向靜止或運動的能力與衝力。因此在我看來,它也領受了更牢靠的防護。因為在頭部,它被顯明為由雙層的骨頭所環繞,而在脊節,或在肋骨的隆起處,並藉那繁複而幾乎難以成形的交織,它更被那同一的守護穩固地保全於一切的安定中,那居第三位、含於其中者,也是由這守護所持守。
9:288
Similiter autem quis hoc etiam de corde conjiciet, quod sicut quædam dorius certa mole solidata, ita cor ossium munitur circumquaque praesidiis. In posteriore namque sui parte spina dorsi et seapulis utrinque vallatur; per utraque vero latera- costarum vinculo nectitur, quod medium ejas am­ biens ab omni passione defendit; in anteriore vera ejus pectus et jugatio colli demissa molliter ci per omnia munimen impertit adversus ea quæ possunt extrinsecus inferre molestiam.
But likewise will one conjecture this also concerning the heart, that just as a certain spine, solidified into a fixed mass, so the heart is fortified round about by the defences of the bones. For in its hinder part it is fenced on both sides by the spine of the back and the shoulder-blades; and on both sides it is bound by the chain of the ribs, which, encompassing its middle, defends it from all suffering; while in its forward part the breast and the soft-hanging junction of the neck impart to it on all sides a fortification against those things which from without can inflict molestation.
但人同樣也會就心作此推測,即如同某根脊柱凝固成固定的塊體,心也照樣四圍被骨頭的防衛所堅固。因為在其後部,它兩側被脊背與肩胛骨護衛;而在兩側,它被肋骨之鏈所束,這鏈環繞其中部,保護它免受一切損傷;而在其前部,胸與柔軟下垂的頸之接合,從各方賦予它防護,抵禦那些從外能加損害之物。
9:289
Et sicUt in- agricultura perspicimus, cum vel imbres ex nutibus, vel fluenta rivulorum madefaciant id quod subjectum cst, ortus autem quidam relationi nostræ, verbi gratia, suppo natur, qui mille diversitates arborum multiplicesque species earum rerum quas terra producit enutriat, quarum et forma et qualitas colorisque proprietas in multam distantiam quæ est in singulh approbetur : cum sint igitur quæ in uno agro humor unus enu­ triat, ut puta vis ista quæ singula quæque madefa- dent;.
And just as we observe in agriculture, when either the rains from the heavens or the streams of rivulets moisten that which is subject to them—and let some origin, for the sake of our comparison, be supposed, which nourishes a thousand diversities of trees and the manifold species of those things which the earth produces, of which both the form and the quality and the property of colour is shown to be in great difference in each one: since, therefore, there are things which one moisture nourishes in one field—as, for example, that force which moistens each several thing—
正如我們在農事中所見的,當天上的雨或溪流的水沾濕那受其灌注之物——為我們的比喻起見,姑且設想有某個本源,它滋養千種不同的樹木,與大地所產之物的繁多種類,其形態、性質與顏色的特性,在每一種中都顯出極大的差異:既然如此,在同一塊田裡有一種濕氣所滋養的諸物——譬如那沾濕各物的力量——
9:290
alit, una, ut dixi, quædam simplexque in sua na­ tura est, earum verorerum quae nutriuntur ex illa proprietas in diversas species qualitatesque conver­ titur, hoc ipsum amarescit in absintbio, et in succum commutatur cicutae mortiferum, et in alio quoque aliud facit, in balsamo, in croco, in papavere. Nam horum aliud est calidum, aliod frigidum, aliud vero mediam quamdam qualitatem possidet. In lauro etiam, ct in lentisco, atque similibus odoriferum est.
it nourishes—being one, as I said, and simple in its own nature—yet the property of those very things which are nourished from it is turned into diverse species and qualities: this same thing grows bitter in wormwood, and is changed into the deadly juice of hemlock, and in another it does another thing—in balsam, in saffron, in the poppy. For of these one is hot, another cold, another possesses a certain middle quality. In the laurel also, and in the mastic-tree, and the like, it is fragrant.
它滋養——如我所說,它是一而單純於自身本性的——然而那些從它得養之物本身的特性,卻變為不同的種類與性質:這同一物在苦艾中變苦,在毒芹中化為致命的汁液,在別的物中又作別的事——在香膏、在番紅花、在罌粟中。因為這些之中,一者熱,一者冷,另一者具有某種居中的性質。在月桂中,在乳香樹中,並類似之物中,它是芬芳的。
9:291
In ficis autem et piris dulcedinem refert, nec non per vitem botrus, et ex eo vinum defluit, et mali succus, et rosæ rubor, candorque lilii, et violæ cærulem, et hyacinthinæ tincturæque purpuverum, et universa quæcunque ex uno eodemque humore de terra oriri conspicimus, in tantos differentias juxta formam et speciem qualitatemque vertuntur.
But in figs and pears it renders sweetness; likewise through the vine the grape-cluster, and from it wine flows down, and the juice of the apple, and the redness of the rose, and the whiteness of the lily, and the blue of the violet, and the dyes of the hyacinth and the purple tinctures, and all whatsoever we behold to arise from the earth out of one and the same moisture, are turned into so many differences according to form and species and quality.
但在無花果與梨中,它呈現甘甜;照樣藉葡萄樹有葡萄串,從其中流下酒,與蘋果的汁,玫瑰的紅,百合的白,紫羅蘭的藍,風信子的染色與紫色的色彩,以及凡我們所見從同一濕氣由大地生出的一切,都按形態、種類與性質變為如此眾多的差異。
9:292
Tale quid et in, nostro hoe animato agro mirabiliter a natura perfe­ ctum esl, imo potius a Domino formatore naturæ- nostræ, ossa scilicet, cartilago, venæ, arteriae, nervi, juncturæ, caro, cutis, arvina, musculi, capilli, un­ gues, oculi, nares, auresque et universa mille pec haec alia diversis proprietatibus ab invicem separata , una species alimenti, juxta naturæ suæsimilitudi nem nutrimenta, ita at subjectis singulis acceder es alimentum, cuicunque membro propinquaverit, juxta illud, etiam commutatur, propriamque consertam vim- sui vigoris impartiens. Si enim ad oculorum loca- pervenerit, eorum usui temperatur, et erga pupilla­ rum tunicas palpebrasque. dividitur.
Something of this kind too has been wonderfully perfected by nature in this our animate field—or rather by the Lord, the Former of our nature—namely bones, cartilage, veins, arteries, sinews, junctures, flesh, skin, fat, muscles, hairs, nails, eyes, nostrils, ears, and all the other thousand things separated one from another by diverse properties: one species of nourishment, according to the likeness of its own nature, the nutriments, so that, as it approaches the several subjects, the food is also changed according to whatever member it draws near to, imparting its own woven-in force of vigour. For if it has come to the places of the eyes, it is tempered to their use, and is divided about the tunics of the pupils and the eyelids.
在我們這有生命的田地中,自然也奇妙地造就了某種類似之事——或更該說是由主、我們本性的塑造者所造——即骨、軟骨、血管、動脈、筋、接合、肉、皮、脂、肌、髮、甲、眼、鼻、耳,以及其餘以不同特性彼此分別的千種事物:唯一種類的養分,按其本性的相似,供應營養,以致它臨近各個受體時,便按它所靠近的任何肢體而隨之改變,分授其自身所織入的活力之力。因為它若來到眼的部位,便被調節以適眼的用途,並分布於瞳的薄膜與眼瞼周圍。
9:293
Si auditus in­ fluxerit, aurium naturae pro sua qualitate miscetur, ef ad labræ veniens efficitur labrum, et in ossc compic- gitur, et in medulla mollescit, et armatur in ner­ fis, et in superficie cutis extenditur, et transit ad ungues, et capillorum exortum tenuissimum per ex­ halationes congruentissimas perficit, quæ siquidem per tortuosos emergunt aditus, crispantes capillos reflexosque generant; si vero per rectos tramites voporum fuerit facta progressio, producti capilli di­ rectique nascUntur.
If it has flowed into the hearing, it is mingled to the nature of the ears according to its quality, and coming to the lip it becomes lip, and is compacted in the bone, and softens in the marrow, and is armed in the sinews, and is stretched out on the surface of the skin, and passes to the nails, and accomplishes the most subtle springing-forth of the hairs through most fitting exhalations; which, if indeed they emerge through tortuous passages, generate curled and reflexed hairs; but if the progression of the vapours has been made through straight channels, the hairs are born produced and straight.
它若流入聽覺,便按其性質與耳的本性相混,臨到唇便成為唇,在骨中凝結,在髓中變軟,在筋中得武裝,在皮的表面被伸展,並通往甲,又藉至為合宜的呼氣成就毛髮至為精微的萌生;這些毛髮若是經由彎曲的通道湧出,便生出捲曲反折的髮;但若蒸氣的行進是經由直的渠道而成,所生的髮便又長又直。
9:294
Sed multum a proposito sermo noster abductus est, dum altius oprra naturæ prose­ quimur, conati describere qualiter nobis et ex qui­ bus constant singula, sive quæ ad bonam vitam, seu etiam quæcunque cum his alia juxta primam seriem nostræ divisionis esse perspeximus. Propositum namque nobis erat ostendere sementinam hanc con­ stitutionis nostre materiam, neque incorporcam esse animan, neque corpus exanime, sed ex vivis anima- tisque corporibus vivum atque animatum in prima formatione deponi, quod excipiens humana natura, veluti alimentum quoddam fomentis illud proprii; nutrimentisque contineat. Id autem juxta utramque pariem congruenter reducetur, et incrementa ret utriusque percipiat.
But our discourse has been led far away from its purpose, while we pursue the works of nature more deeply, having attempted to describe in what manner and out of what things the several parts consist for us—whether those which pertain to the good life, or also whatever other things we have perceived to be, together with these, according to the first order of our division. For our purpose was to show that this seed-like matter of our constitution is neither an incorporeal soul nor a lifeless body, but that, from living and animate bodies, a living and animate thing is laid down in the first formation; which, when human nature receives it, it contains, as it were a certain nourishment, by the fosterings and nutriments proper to it. And this is fittingly led back according to either part, and receives the increments of each.
但我們的論述已遠離了其目的,因我們更深地探究自然的諸般作為,試圖描述各部分為我們是以何種方式、由何種事物所組成——無論是那些關乎美好生活的,或還有按我們劃分之首序、與這些一同被我們所察覺的別的事物。因為我們的目的是要顯明:我們構造的這如種子般的質料,既非無形體的靈魂,也非無生命的身體,乃是從有生命、有靈氣的身體中,在最初的構成中安放下一個有生命、有靈氣之物;人的本性領受它時,便如同某種養分,藉適合它的滋養與營養而含容它。而這按二方面合宜地被引回,並領受各方的增長。
9:295
Mox per hanc artificiosam atque disciplinabilem formationem consertum animæ de- monstrat effectum, in primis quidem apparentem obscurius, proinde eum instrumenti perfectione re­ lucentem, sicut in sculptoribus lapidum pervidemus, dispositumque est armici speciem præformare anima­ lis alicujus in lapide. Hoc autem qui proposuit, pri­ mum quidem lapidem a materia cognata proscindit, deinde ejus superflua circumcidens, per mutationem primæ figurationis id' quod proposuit adumbrat, ita ut cxpertus etiam per id quod apparet, intentionem artificis sine difftcultate conjiciat.
Soon, through this skilful and orderly formation, it shows the woven-in effect of the soul, at first appearing more obscurely, then shining forth with the perfection of the instrument—just as we perceive in sculptors of stones, where it has been determined to pre-form the appearance of some living thing in the stone. And he who has proposed this first indeed cuts off the stone from its kindred matter, then cutting away its superfluities, by the change of the first shaping he adumbrates that which he has proposed, so that even one unskilled may, through that which appears, without difficulty conjecture the intention of the craftsman.
不久,藉這巧妙而有條理的構成,它便顯出靈魂所織入的功效,起初顯得較為朦朧,繼而隨著器官的完備而光照煥發——正如我們在石匠身上所見的,當他們已定意要在石中預先塑出某活物的形相。那定意作此的人,先把石頭從其同類的質料中切割下來,然後削去其多餘之處,藉那最初成形的更易,勾勒出他所定意的,以致連未受訓練者也能藉那顯露之物,毫無困難地推測出工匠的意圖。
9:296
Rursus explicans amplius ad similitudinem ejus cujusgerit studium prorsus accedit, tam deinde in ipsa materia speciem diligenter integreque demonstrans, artem deducit ad finem, et cst leo vel homo, vel aliquid aliud, quod facturo ab artifice fue it, qui ante paululum lapis erat informis, non quod materia sit oblitterata per spe­ ciem, sed quod species per artem materiæ probetur impressa. Hoc modo quis et de anima cogitans, nul­ latenus a rationis tramite deviabit, naturamque cun­ ctam artificiosius operans, ejusdemque generis ma­ teriam sibi sumens, vivam statuam de bominis por­ tione formavit.
Again, unfolding it more fully, he draws quite near to the likeness of that whose pursuit he is set upon; then thereafter, in the very matter diligently and entirely demonstrating the species, he leads the art to its end; and it is a lion, or a man, or something else, which was to be made by the craftsman, which a little before was shapeless stone—not that the matter is blotted out by the species, but that the species is proved to be impressed upon the matter through the art. In this manner, whoever thinks also concerning the soul will by no means deviate from the path of reason; for nature, working over all things more artfully, and taking to itself matter of the same kind, has formed a living statue out of a portion of man.
他又把它更充分地展開,全然趨近於他所致力之物的相似;然後此後,在那質料本身勤勉而完整地顯出形相,將技藝引至其終局;於是它便成為獅子、或人、或工匠當造的別物,這在不久之前還是無形的石頭——並非質料被形相所抹滅,而是形相被證明為藉技藝印刻於質料之上。凡如此思想靈魂的人,也絕不致偏離理性的途徑;因為自然在萬物之上更巧妙地運作,取同類的質料歸於自身,便從人的一份造出一個活的塑像。
9:297
Sicut enim lapidis operationem sub­ secuta est species, in primis quidem obscurior, post autem perfectior cum ipsum opus est terminatum : sic et in sculptura hujus instrumenti species decla­ ratur animaro proportione subjecti imperfecta in im­ perfecto, et in perfecto integra perfectaque subsistens. Sed in exordio perfecta erat, nisi per malitiam fuisset natura vitiata. Ideoque communio, quæ ad passibilem animalemque generationem nobis accessit, in confir­ luatione nostra non protinus elucere divinam facit imaginem, sed via quadam consequentia per mate­ riales animæ proprietates homo ad perfectionem consummationemque perducitur.
For just as the species followed upon the working of the stone—at first indeed more obscure, but afterwards more perfect when the work itself was finished—so also in the sculpting of this instrument the species is declared, imperfect in the imperfect by the proportion of the subject, and in the perfect subsisting whole and perfect. But in the beginning it was perfect, had not nature been vitiated by malice. And therefore the communion which has accrued to us toward the passible and animal generation does not, in our constitution, forthwith cause the divine image to shine out, but by a certain way of consequence, through the material properties of the soul, man is led to perfection and consummation.
因為正如形相隨石頭的工作而來——起初固然較朦朧,但工作本身完成後便較完備——照樣在這器官的雕琢中,形相也被宣明,按所承載者的比例在不完全者中是不完全的,而在完全者中則整全完備地存立。但起初它本是完全的,若非本性被惡所敗壞。因此那臨到我們、趨向那受苦而屬血氣之生育的相通,在我們的構造中並不立即使神聖的形像顯耀,乃是藉著某種前後相承的途徑,透過靈魂的物質特性,人被引向完全與成全。
9:298
Hujuscemodi vero dogma et beatus Apostolus in Epistola ad Corinthios insinuat, dicens : Cum essem parvulus, ut parvulus loquebar, ut parvulus sapiebam, ut parvulus cogitabam: quando factu sum vir, evacuavi quæ erant parvuli, non quod alia in viro perfecto subintret præter illam quæ intelligebatur in parvulo, ut puerilis evacuetur ani­ mus, et virilis nihilominus inscratur, sed idem ipse n illo quidem imperfectus est, in hoc autem perfe­ ctionis suæ demonstrat effectum ;
A doctrine of this kind the blessed Apostle also intimates in the Epistle to the Corinthians, saying: When I was a little child, I spoke as a little child, I was wise as a little child, I thought as a little child; but when I became a man, I did away with the things that were of a little child—not that anything else enters in within the perfect man besides that which was understood in the little child, so that the childish mind is done away and a manly one is nonetheless introduced; but the same self is in the one indeed imperfect, and in the other displays the effect of its own perfection;
這一類的教義,蒙福的使徒在《哥林多書信》中也有暗示,說:「我作孩童的時候,話語像孩童,明慧像孩童,思想像孩童;既成了人,就把孩童的事丟棄了。」並非有什麼別的東西在那成全的人裡進入、超乎那在孩童裡所領會的,以致孩童的心智被廢除,而成人的心智又被引入;乃是同一個自我,在那一者中固然是不完全的,在這一者中卻顯出其自身成全的功效;
9:299
sicut enim quacun­ que nascuntur et crescunt, vivere fatemur, omnia vero quæ vitæ participant ot naturali motu vegetrn­ tur, nullatenus exanima essc quis dixerit, nec tamen hanc talem vitam perfectæ animæ dicimus esse par­ ticipem, denique in virgultis vitalis quædam operatio delata usque ad motum sensibilem pervenire non potuit; itemque per augmentum animalis quædam potentia irrationabilibus veniens, nec ipsa prfectio­ nem est consecuta rationis, et intellectus gratiam omnino non capiens: idcirco veram alqne perfectam hominis animam esse definimus, quæ vigere per omnes effectus agnoscitur.
for just as we confess that whatsoever things are born and grow do live, while all things that partake of life and are quickened by natural motion no one would say to be in any wise lifeless—yet we do not say that such a life as this is partaker of the perfect soul; in the same way, in shrubs a certain vital operation, carried even unto motion, could not attain to sensible motion; and likewise, through growth, a certain power coming to the irrational creatures did not itself attain to the perfection of reason, and does not at all receive the grace of intellect: therefore we define the true and perfect soul of man to be that which is recognized to be vigorous through all its effects.
因為正如我們承認凡被生與生長之物都是活著的,而一切有分於生命、被自然運動所鼓動之物,無人會說它們絲毫是無生命的——然而我們並不說這樣的生命有分於那完全的靈魂;同樣,在灌木中某種生命的運作,雖達於運動,卻不能達到可感的運動;照樣,藉著生長而臨到無理性生物的某種能力,本身也未達於理性的成全,且全然不領受理智的恩典:因此我們界定人真實而完全的靈魂,乃是那被認出在一切功效中都生氣勃發的。
9:300
Si quid vero aliud viLe participat, per abusionem quamdam consuetudini, animatum esse profitemur, non quod perfecta in hoc sit anima, sed quod partes in ea quædam animalis operationis existant, quæ etiam nobis juxta mysti- caro legislatoris Moysi relationem, quati de hominis generatione protulit, propter communionem passibi­ litatis accessisse cognoscimus. Ideoque consilium præbens beatus Paulus his qui se audire poterant, perfectionem suadet arripere, modumque quo pro­ positum possit assequi supponit et dicit: Exuentes vos veterem hominem cum actibus suis, el induentes novum qui renovatur in agnitionem secundum imaginem ejus qui creavit euM.
But if anything else shares in life, we profess it to be animate by a certain customary abuse of language — not because a perfect soul is present in it, but because certain parts of an animal operation exist within it, which (as we learn) have come to us also through a kind of fellowship in passibility, according to the mystical account of Moses the lawgiver, which he set forth concerning the generation of man. And therefore the blessed Paul, offering counsel to those who were able to hear him, urges them to lay hold of perfection, and he supplies the manner by which his aim may be attained, saying: 'Putting off the old man with his deeds, and putting on the new, who is renewed unto the knowledge according to the image of him that created him.'
但凡其他分有生命之物,我們乃是依某種習慣上的濫稱,方稱之為有生命的;這並非因為其中有完備的靈魂,而是因為其中存有動物性運作的某些部分。我們得知,這些部分也是藉著與受苦性的某種交通而臨到我們身上,正如立法者摩西關於人的受造所述的奧祕記載。因此,蒙福的保羅向那些能聽從他的人提出勸勉,催促他們去把握成全,並指出可以達致此目的的途徑,說:「脫去舊人和舊人的行為,穿上新人;這新人在知識上漸漸更新,正如造他主的形像。」
9:301
Sed revertamur rursus ad illati di­ vinam gratiam qua creavit in principio Deus hominem, qui dixit: Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudi­ nem nostram, cui est gloria in sæcula sæculorum. Amen. Sancti Gregorii Nysseni episcopi de Imagine libri continentis subsequentia eorum quæ a fratre ejus beato Basilio in Hexameron sunt relicta, finis.
But let us return once more to the divine grace by which God created man in the beginning — He who said: 'Let us make man to our image and likeness,' to whom be glory unto the ages of ages. Amen. Here ends the book of the holy Gregory, bishop of Nyssa, On the Image, containing the sequel to those things which were left by his brother, the blessed Basil, in the Hexaemeron.
現在讓我們再次回到神在起初創造人時所施的神聖恩典——祂曾說:「我們要照著我們的形像、按著我們的樣式造人。」願榮耀歸於祂,直到世世代代。阿們。聖尼撒主教額我略《論形像》一書到此結束,此書承接其兄蒙福的巴西流在《創世六日論》中所未盡之言。
← ch. 8ch. 10 →
123456789101112