📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 論三位一體與詩篇釋義

普瓦捷的希拉里

論三位一體與詩篇釋義 第 1 章 第 2/55 段

拉丁文原文.38 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 1:40–1:77(全章共 2058 節)

第 2 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
1:40
itaque secundum domini misericordiam aperiendi uniuscuiusque psalmi clauem reperturi huius ipsius primi psalmi aditum propria sua et congrua claue pandamus. PSALMUS PRIMUS. Principalis haec in psalmis intellegentia est, ex cuius persona, uel in quem ea, quse dicta sint, intellegi oporteant, posse discernere. non enim uniformis et indiscreta eorum est constitutio, ut non et auctores habeant et genera diuersa. inuenimus enim in his frequenter personam dei patris solere proponi, ut in octogesimo et octauo psalmo, cum dicitur: exal 1 taui electum de plebe mea. inueni Dauid seruum meum, in oleo sancto unxi eum. ipse inuocabit me: pater mese es tu et susceptor salutis meae.
因此,照著主的憐憫,我們既要尋得開啟各篇詩篇的鑰匙,就讓我們用這第一篇本身合宜契合的鑰匙開啟牠的入口。第一篇。這是在詩篇中最主要的領悟:能分辨所說之事當從何人的口吻、或當歸於何人來領會。因為牠們的組成並非劃一無別,以致沒有不同的作者與種類。因為我們在其中屢屢發現,父神的位格常被提出,如第八十八篇所說:「我從我民中高舉了那蒙揀選的;我尋得我僕人大衛,用聖油膏了他。他要求告我:你是我的父,是拯救我的。」
Therefore, according to the Lord's mercy, being about to find the key for opening each several psalm, let us open the entrance of this very first psalm with its own proper and fitting key. THE FIRST PSALM. This is the chief understanding in the psalms: to be able to discern from whose person, or unto whom, those things which are said ought to be understood. For their composition is not uniform and undivided, so as not to have both authors and diverse kinds. For we find in them frequently that the person of God the Father is wont to be set forth, as in the eighty-eighth psalm, when it is said: 'I have exalted the chosen one out of my people; I have found David my servant, with holy oil I have anointed him. He shall call upon me: You are my Father and the sustainer of my salvation.'
1:41
et ego primogenitum ponam eum, excelsum super omnes reges terrae. personam uero filii in plurimis fere introduci, ut in septimo decimo: populus, quem non cognoui, seruiuit mihi; et in uicesimo primo: diuiserunt uestimenta mea sibi et super uestem meam miseruntsortem. nunc autem primum hunc psalmum uel ex persona patris, uel ex persona filii non posse intellegi, res ipsa abso- Inte docet: sed in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius, et in lege eius meditabitur die ac nocte. in eo enim psalmo, in quo personam patris designari meminimus, propria et apta memorantur, cum dicitur: ipse inuocabit: pater meus es tu, deus meus, et susceptor salutis meae.
「我也要立他為長子,為地上眾王中最高的。」但子的位格則在極多處被引入,如第十七篇:「我素不認識的民必事奉我」;又如第二十一篇:「他們分了我的外衣,為我的裡衣拈鬮。」但如今這第一篇既不能從父的位格、也不能從子的位格來領會,事情本身就絕對地教明:「惟他喜愛耶和華的律法,晝夜思想他的律法。」因為在那我們所指出、標明父之位格的詩篇中,所追述的乃是恰切合宜之事,即所說的:「他要求告我:你是我的父,是我的神,是拯救我的。」
'And I will make him my firstborn, higher than all the kings of the earth.' But the person of the Son is introduced in very many places, as in the seventeenth: 'A people whom I did not know served me'; and in the twenty-first: 'They divided my garments among themselves, and upon my vesture they cast lots.' But now, that this first psalm cannot be understood either from the person of the Father or from the person of the Son, the matter itself absolutely teaches: 'but his will was in the law of the Lord, and on his law he will meditate day and night.' For in that psalm in which we noted the person of the Father to be designated, things proper and fitting are recalled, when it is said: 'He shall call upon me: You are my Father, my God, and the sustainer of my salvation.'
1:42
et in eo, in quo filius loqui docetur, ipse se ex his, quse commemorat, dictorum suorum profitetur auctorem. dicens: populus, quem non cognoui, seruiuit mihi. dum enim et pater dicit: ipse inuocabit me et filius ait: populus seruiuit mihi, ipsos se esse, qui de se loquantur, ostendunt. at uero nunc cum dicitur: sed lege domini fuit uoluntas eius, nulla domini persona de se loquentis ostenditur. sed alterius potius, beatitudinem eius scilicet uiri, cuius in lege domini, uoluntas sit, praedicantis. persona itaque prophetse, cuius ore spiritus sanctus loquatur, nunc esse noscenda est officio oris eius ad cognitionem nos sacramenti spiritalis erudiens.
而在那教導子說話的詩篇中,祂自己從所追述之事,宣認自己是所言的作者,說:「我素不認識的民必事奉我。」因為父既說「他要求告我」,子既說「有民事奉我」,牠們就顯明是那論到自身而說話的本體。但如今當說「惟他喜愛耶和華的律法」時,所顯明的並非論到自身而說話之主的任何位格,乃是另一位——就是那宣揚那人(其心願在乎主律法之人)之福的人。因此,那藉其口聖靈說話之先知的位格,如今須被認出,牠藉其口的職分教導我們,以認識屬靈的奧祕。
And in that psalm in which the Son is taught to speak, He Himself, from those things which He recalls, professes Himself the author of His own sayings, saying: 'A people whom I did not know served me.' For since the Father says: 'He shall call upon me,' and the Son says: 'A people served me,' they show themselves to be the very ones who speak concerning themselves. But now, when it is said: 'but his will was in the law of the Lord,' no person of the Lord speaking concerning Himself is shown, but rather of another—namely, of one proclaiming the blessedness of that man whose will is in the law of the Lord. And so the person of the prophet, by whose mouth the Holy Spirit speaks, must now be recognized, instructing us by the office of his mouth unto the knowledge of the spiritual sacrament.
1:43
Et cum hsec loquatur, quaerendum est, de quo uiro eum loqui intellegere debeamus. ait enim: beatus uir, qui non abiit in consilio impiorum et in uia peccatorum non stetit et in cathedra pestilentiae non sedit. sed in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius, et in lege eius meditabitur die ac nocte. et erit tamquam lignum, quod plantatum est secus decursus aquarum, quod fructum suum dabit in tempore suo. et folium eius nou decidet: et omnia, quserendum faciet, bene dirigentur. multos uel praesenti sermone uel ex litteris ac scriptis eorum conperi ita sensisse de psalmo hoc, quod significari in eo dominus noster Iesus Christus intellegi debeat, cuius beatitudo in his, quse subiecta sunt, prsedicetur.
既然他說這些話,就當查問我們應當領會他是論到哪一個人在說。因為他說:「不從惡人的計謀、不站罪人的道路、不坐褻慢人的座位,這人便為有福。惟他喜愛耶和華的律法,晝夜思想他的律法。他要像一棵樹栽在溪水旁,按時候結果子,葉子也不枯乾;凡他所作的盡都順利。」我或藉當面談論、或從他們的信函著作中,發覺許多人對這篇詩篇如此思想:以為當領會其中所指的乃是我們的主耶穌基督,祂的福分在其下所附之事中被宣揚。
And since he speaks these things, it must be asked concerning what man we ought to understand him to be speaking. For he says: 'Blessed is the man who has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly, and has not stood in the way of sinners, and has not sat in the seat of pestilence; but his will was in the law of the Lord, and on his law he will meditate day and night. And he shall be like a tree which is planted beside the courses of waters, which will give its fruit in its season; and its leaf shall not fall off, and all things whatsoever he shall do shall be well directed.' Many, either by present discourse or from the letters and writings of them, I have found to have thought thus concerning this psalm: that it ought to be understood that our Lord Jesus Christ is signified in it, whose blessedness is proclaimed in the things which are subjoined.
1:44
sed id nec modo, nec ratione docuerunt; bonae quidem opinionis affectu, quia omnis ad eum prophetia est referenda psalmorum: sed ubi et quando ad eum prophetise ipsius sermo se referat, rationabilis scientiae discernendum est ueritate. Ea autem, quse in exordio psalmi posita sunt, minime personse eius dignitatique conueniunt; et incautam hanc ita prsedicandi facilitatem ipsa illa coarguunt, quae continentur in psalmo. cum enim dicitur: et in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius, cum lex per dei filium lata sit, quomodo ad eum ob id beatitudo referetur, quia uoluntas eius in lege domini fuerit, cum dominus ipse sit legis?
但他們這樣教導既無方法、也無道理;固然是出於善意的一種情感,因為詩篇的一切預言都當歸於祂:然而這預言的話語在何處、何時歸向祂自己,卻須憑合理知識的真理來分辨。但那安置在詩篇開端之事,斷不合乎祂的位格與尊榮;而那含在詩篇中之事本身,就駁斥了這樣宣講的輕率隨意。因為當說「他的心願在乎主的律法」時,既然律法是藉神的兒子所頒賜的,怎能因他的心願在乎主的律法,就將福分歸於祂呢?既然主自己乃是律法的主。
But this they taught neither with method nor with reason; out of an affection of good opinion, indeed, because all prophecy of the psalms is to be referred to Him: but where and when the very discourse of the prophecy refers itself to Him must be discerned by the truth of a reasonable knowledge. But those things which are placed in the opening of the psalm by no means befit His person and dignity; and those very things which are contained in the psalm refute this rash facility of thus proclaiming. For when it is said: 'and his will was in the law of the Lord,' since the law was given through the Son of God, how shall blessedness be referred to Him on this account, because his will was in the law of the Lord, when the Lord Himself is the Lord of the law?
1:45
quod autem lex eius sit, in psalmo septuagesimo et septimo ipse testatur, quo ait: adtendite, populus meus, in legem meam, inclinate aurem uestram in uerba oris mei. aperiam in parabola os meum. et haec Matthseus euangelista ab ipso dicta esse confirmat, dicens: ideo in parabolis lo q loquebatur, ut inpleretur quod dictum est: aperiam in parabolis os meum. prophetiam ergo suam dominus rebus inpleuit. nam in his, in quibus locuturum se spoponderat, parabolis est locutus.
但律法是屬祂的,祂自己在第七十七篇中作證,在那裡祂說:「我的民哪,你們要留心聽我的律法,側耳聽我口中的話。我要開口說比喻。」而這些話是祂所說的,福音書作者馬太予以確證,說:「這是要應驗那話說:我要開口用比喻,所以祂用比喻對他們講。」因此,主以行為應驗了祂的預言。因為在祂所應許要說之事上,祂乃用比喻說話。
But that the law is His, He Himself testifies in the seventy-seventh psalm, in which He says: 'Attend, my people, to my law; incline your ear to the words of my mouth. I will open my mouth in a parable.' And that these things were spoken by Him, the evangelist Matthew confirms, saying: 'Therefore He spoke in parables, that it might be fulfilled which was said: I will open my mouth in parables.' The Lord, therefore, fulfilled His prophecy by deeds. For in those things in which He had promised that He would speak, He spoke in parables.
1:46
id autem quod ait:' et erit tamquam lignum, quod plantatum est secus decursus aquarum - in quo conparatiue beatitudinis profectus quomodo personse eius poterit coaptari, ut sit dei filio plantatum lignum beatius, ob quod beatus sit, quia aliquando similitudinem eius profectu beatitudinis consequatur? dehinc cum secundum Sapientiam et apostolum et ante saecula et ante tempora aeterna sit et primogenitus omnis creaturse sit, et in ipso et per ipsum creata sint omnia, quomodo his rebus cum fiet similis, beatus est, quse ab ipso sint instituta?
但他所說的:「他要像一棵樹栽在溪水旁」——其中以比擬之法陳明福分的進展——這怎能配得上祂的位格,以致一棵所栽的樹竟比神的兒子更有福,並因此得福,乃因牠在福分的進展上有一天得著祂的樣式呢?再者,既然按智慧書與使徒所說,祂是先於萬世、先於永恆之時的,又是一切受造之物的首生者,並且萬有都是在祂裡面、藉祂而造的,那麼當祂被造得像這些事物時,祂怎能是有福的——這些事物原是藉祂所立定的?
But that which he says: 'and he shall be like a tree which is planted beside the courses of waters'—in which, by way of comparison, the progress of blessedness is set forth—how will it be able to be fitted to His person, so that a tree planted should be more blessed than the Son of God, for which reason it is blessed, because at some time it attains the likeness of Him in the progress of blessedness? Furthermore, since according to Wisdom and the apostle He is both before the ages and before the eternal times, and is the firstborn of all creation, and in Him and through Him all things were created, how, when He shall be made like to these things, is He blessed—things which were established by Him?
1:47
cum neque creatoris uirtus ad beatitudinis suse perfectionem conparatione egeat creaturse, neque primogeniti antiquitas in eo, quod erit tamquam lignum, tempus praeposterae conparationis admittat. id enim, quod erit per expectandum adhuc tempus, non potest uideri ut aut fuerit, aut iam sit in rerum natura. quidquid autem iam est, non eget dilatione temporis, ut ad id, quod erit, inchoetur, quia antiquitate exordii sui esse iam permanet.
——既然造物主的能力不需與受造物相比較,方得成全其自身的福分,那首生者的太初亦不容於「他要像一棵樹」中有一種本末倒置之比較的時間。因為那藉尚待期待之時間才將有的,就不能被看為已經有過、或已經存在於萬物的本性之中。但凡已經存在的,就不需要時間的延遲,好叫牠向那將有的開始,因為牠憑自身根源的太初,已然常存於存有之中。
—since neither does the power of the Creator need comparison with the creature for the perfection of His own blessedness, nor does the antiquity of the firstborn admit a time of preposterous comparison in that 'he shall be like a tree.' For that which shall be through a time yet to be awaited cannot be seen either to have been, or already to be, in the nature of things. But whatever already is has no need of the delay of time, that it may be begun toward that which it shall be, because by the antiquity of its own origin it already abides in being.
1:48
Itaque quia haec a diuinitate unigeniti dei filii domini nostri Iesu Christi intelleguntur aliena, uir ille hic a propheta beatus praedicari opinandus est, qui se ei corpori, quod dominus adsumpsit, in quo homo natus est, conformem studio aequitatis et totius iustitiae perfectione praestiterit. et sane id ita intellegi oportere, plenior psalmi expositio monstrabit. Speciosissimum autem hoc et dignissimum incipiendorum psalmorum sanctus spiritus sumpsit exordium, ut humanam infirmitatem per spem beatitudinis ad innocens religionis studium adhortaretur, ut sacramentum dei corporati doceret, ut communionem glorise?
因此,既然這些事被領會為與神獨生子、我們主耶穌基督的神性無關,那麼在此被先知宣稱為有福的那人,當理解為:他乃是憑公正的熱心與全然公義的完全,使自己順服合乎主所取的那身體——就是祂作為人所生的身體。而這實在當如此領會,本篇更完整的解說必顯明。但聖靈取用了這極美、極尊貴的開端來起始詩篇,好叫祂藉福分的盼望勉勵人的軟弱,使人趨向敬虔那無邪的熱心,好叫祂教導神成為肉身的奧祕,好叫祂應許榮耀的交通——
And so, since these things are understood to be foreign to the divinity of the only-begotten Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ, that man is to be supposed here proclaimed blessed by the prophet, who shall have rendered himself conformable to that body which the Lord assumed—in which He was born as man—by the zeal of equity and by the perfection of all righteousness. And that this indeed ought so to be understood, a fuller exposition of the psalm will show. But the Holy Spirit took this most beautiful and most worthy exordium for beginning the psalms, that He might exhort human weakness through the hope of blessedness unto the innocent zeal of religion, that He might teach the sacrament of God incarnate, that He might promise the communion of glory—
1:49
caelestis polliceretur, ut poenam iudicii denuntiaret, ut differentiam resurrectionis ostenderet, ut prouidentiam dei in retributione monstraret. perfecta scilicet consummataque ratione tantse prophetise ordinem inchoauit, ut hominum inbecillitatem ad fidei studium beati uiri spes inliceret, spei beatitudinem conparata ligni beatitudo sponderet, insolentem impietatem intra metum denuntiata impiis seueritas coherceret, meriti differentiam in consiliis sanctorum condicionis ordo distingueret, dei magnificentiam in cognoscendis iustorun» uiis sequitas constituta monstraret. sed res ipsas et earum uerba tractemus.
——就是屬天榮耀的交通,好叫祂宣告審判的刑罰,好叫祂顯明復活的差別,好叫祂展示神在報應中的天意。祂實在是以完全而周備的道理,起始了這如此偉大之預言的次序,好叫有福之人的盼望引動人的軟弱、趨向信心的熱切;好叫那與盼望之福相比的樹之福作為擔保;好叫那向惡人所宣告的嚴厲,將傲慢的不敬約束在懼怕之中;好叫身分的次序,在聖徒的計謀中分別功德的差異;好叫那所立定的公平,顯明神在義人道路中被認識的宏偉。但讓我們就來討論這些事本身及其字句。
—the communion of heavenly glory, that He might announce the penalty of judgment, that He might show the difference of the resurrection, that He might display the providence of God in retribution. With a perfect and consummated reasoning, indeed, He began the order of so great a prophecy, that the hope of the blessed man might allure the feebleness of men unto the zeal of faith; that the blessedness of the tree, compared to the blessedness of hope, might pledge it; that the announced severity toward the ungodly might restrain insolent impiety within fear; that the order of condition might distinguish the difference of merit in the counsels of the saints; that the equity established might show the magnificence of God in the paths of the righteous to be known. But let us treat the matters themselves and their words.
1:50
Beatus uir, qui non abiit in consilio impiorum et in uia peccatorum non stetit et in cathedra pestilentiae non sedit. sed in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius, et in lege eius meditabitur die ac nocte. quinque generum obseruantiam beato uiro subesse propheta commemorat: primam in impiorum consilio non eundi, alteram in peccatorum uia non consistendi, tertiam in cathedra pestilentiae non sedendi, tum deinde uoluntatis in lege domini ponendae, postremo in ea die noctuque meditandi. ergo necesse est differre impium a peccatore, peccatorem a pestilente; maxime cum sit impiis consilium, peccatori uia, cathedra pestilenti.
「不從惡人的計謀、不站罪人的道路、不坐褻慢人的座位,這人便為有福。惟他喜愛耶和華的律法,晝夜思想他的律法。」先知記述有五樣的遵守臨到那有福之人:其一,不行在惡人的計謀中;其二,不站在罪人的道路上;其三,不坐在褻慢人的座位上;其次,將心願安放在主的律法中;最後,晝夜思想牠。因此必須將惡人與罪人分別,將罪人與褻慢人分別;尤其是既然「計謀」屬乎惡人,「道路」屬乎罪人,「座位」屬乎褻慢人。
'Blessed is the man who has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly, and has not stood in the way of sinners, and has not sat in the seat of pestilence; but his will was in the law of the Lord, and on his law he will meditate day and night.' The prophet records that the observance of five kinds underlies the blessed man: the first, of not going in the counsel of the ungodly; the second, of not standing in the way of sinners; the third, of not sitting in the seat of pestilence; then next, of placing one's will in the law of the Lord; lastly, of meditating on it day and night. Therefore it is necessary to distinguish the ungodly from the sinner, the sinner from the pestilent; especially since to the ungodly belongs 'counsel,' to the sinner 'the way,' to the pestilent 'the seat.'
1:51
dehinc cum in consilio impiorum eatur potius quam stetur, in uia uero peccatoris stetur magis quam eatur. quarum rerum causas ut intellegere possimus, discernendum est, quanto differat peccator ab impio, ut per id intellegi possit, cur peccatori uia. et impio consilium deputetur; dehinc cur et in uia standum et in consilio eundum sit, cum humana consuetudo et in consilio standum et in uia eundum esse decernat. non omnis, qui peccator est, et impius est: impius autem non potest non esse peccator. et sumamus ex usu conscientise communis exemplum. patres suos amare possunt filii, licet ebriosi sint et lasciui et prodigi; et inter haec uitia carent impietate, qui non carent crimine.
其次,既然人在惡人的計謀中是行走多於站立,但在罪人的道路上卻是站立多於行走。為使我們能明白這些事的緣由,必須分辨罪人與惡人差別何等之大,好藉此明白為何「道路」歸於罪人、「計謀」歸於惡人;其次,為何當在道路上站立、在計謀中行走,然而人的習慣卻定規當在計謀中站立、在道路上行走。並非凡是罪人的都是惡人;但惡人卻不能不是罪人。讓我們從共通良知之運用中取一例。兒子能愛他們的父親,縱然這些父親是醉酒、放蕩、揮霍的;在這些惡習之中,他們雖不無罪過,卻不至於不敬虔。
Next, since in the counsel of the ungodly one rather goes than stands, but in the way of the sinner one rather stands than goes. That we may be able to understand the causes of these things, it must be discerned how greatly the sinner differs from the ungodly, so that through this it may be understood why 'the way' is assigned to the sinner and 'the counsel' to the ungodly; and next, why one must both stand in the way and go in the counsel, whereas human custom decrees that one must stand in counsel and go on the way. Not everyone who is a sinner is also ungodly; but the ungodly cannot but be a sinner. And let us take an example from the use of common conscience. Sons are able to love their fathers, even though they be drunkards and wanton and prodigal; and amid these vices they lack not crime, yet they lack impiety.
1:52
impii uero, licet in praecipuis sint continentiae frugalitatisque uirtutibus, omne tamen, quodcumque aliud extra impietatem erit crimen, in contumelia parentis excedunt. Igitur secundum hoc propositum exemplum impium discerni a peccatore non dubium est. et impios quidem eos esse natura ipsa iudicii communis ostendit, qui cognitionem dei expetere fastidiunt, qui nullum esse mundi creatorem inreligiosa opinione praesumunt, qui mundum in hunc habitum ornatumque fortuitis motibus constitisse commemorant, qui, ne quod iudicium creatori suo ob uitam recte criminoseue gestam relinquant, uolunt ex naturae necessitate se nasci et ex eadem rursum necessitate dissolui.
然而不虔者,縱使他們在節制與儉樸的主要德行上超群出眾,可是在虔敬以外的任何其他罪過上,其虧欠也不過如同一個侮辱父母的人。所以,按著這所提出的例子,不虔者當與罪人有所分別,這是毫無疑問的。而這些人確是不虔者,這連公共判斷的本性本身也顯明出來:就是那些不屑尋求對神的認識的人,那些憑不敬虔的意見擅自斷定世界並無創造者的人,那些聲稱世界是由偶然的運動而成就其現今形貌與裝飾的人;還有那些人,為要不給他們的創造者留下任何對其一生行善或行惡的審判,便主張自己是出於本性的必然而生,又出於同樣的必然而消亡。
The impious, however, even though they may excel in the chief virtues of continence and frugality, yet in every other offense whatsoever, apart from impiety itself, fall short only as one who insults a parent. Therefore, according to this proposed example, it is not doubtful that the impious man is to be distinguished from the sinner. And that these are impious the very nature of common judgment shows: those who disdain to seek the knowledge of God, who by an irreligious opinion presume that there is no creator of the world, who declare that the world took its present shape and adornment from chance movements, and who, so as to leave their creator no judgment over a life rightly or wickedly lived, would have it that they are born by a necessity of nature and again by that same necessity are dissolved.
1:53
horum igitur omne consilium fluctuans, incertum ac uagum est et in isdem ac per eadem sine ulla consistendi statione differtur; non enim tenet modum definitionis alicuius. creatorem mundi disputatio docere ausa non est. cum enim quaeras, cur mundus et quando et in quantum? et utrum mundus homini, an homo mundo? et mors ob quid, uel quo usque, uel qualis? circa hsec impietatis suae consilia agitur semper et uadit, loco consistendi in his consiliis non reperto. Sunt et alia consilia impiorum, eorum scilicet, qui in haeresim delapsi nec noui nec ueteris Testamenti legibus continentur.
所以,這些人的一切籌算都是動搖不定、含糊而漂泊的,在同樣的事上、藉著同樣的途徑,被拋來拋去,毫無安歇之處;因為它不守任何界定的準則。他們的辯論不敢教導誰是世界的創造者。因為當你問:為何有世界、何時有、有到何等程度?世界是為人而設,還是人為世界而設?死亡是為何而有、到何等地步、是何等性質?──他們不虔的籌算便總是圍繞這些事被驅趕、來回奔走,因為在這些籌算中找不到可站立之處。此外還有不虔者的別種籌算,就是那些已墮入異端、既不受新約也不受舊約律法約束之人的籌算。
Of these men, therefore, every deliberation is fluctuating, uncertain and wandering, and in the same things and by the same means it is tossed about without any point of rest; for it holds to no measure of any definition. Their disputation has not dared to teach who is the creator of the world. For when you ask, why the world, and when, and to what extent? and whether the world is for man, or man for the world? and why death, or how far, or of what sort? about these things the deliberations of their impiety are ever driven and go to and fro, since no place of standing is found in these deliberations. There are also other deliberations of the impious, namely of those who, having slipped into heresy, are restrained by the laws neither of the New nor of the Old Testament.
1:54
quorum sermo in orbem semper et circulum erroris inflexus, nihil tenens et in nullo consistens indefinitse sententiae cursu recursuque iactatur. quorum impietatis est, deum non ex dei ipsius professione sed ex arbitrii sui uoluntate metiri; ignorantes non minoris impietatis esse, deum fingere, quam negare; a quibus cum requiras, quo spei ac fidei suse fine sic sentiant, confunduntur, perturbantur, dissimulant, circumerrant et finem ipsum eius, dequa quaeritur, disputationis euitant. beatus ergo uir est, qui in hoc impiorum consilio non abiit, id est, qui ipsam illam in hoc consilio eundi non admiserit uoluntatem: quia quae impia sunt, uel cogitasse iam crimen sit.
他們的言論總是彎曲成錯謬的環與圈,甚麼也抓不住,在甚麼上也站立不穩,在一種無定見解的往復奔流中被拋來拋去。他們的不虔就在於:不按神自己的宣示、而按自己揀選的意願來衡量神,卻不知道虛構一位神與否認一位神乃是同等的不虔。當你追問他們,究竟出於盼望與信仰的甚麼目的而持此見解時,他們便張皇失措、陷於混亂、支吾其詞、四處遊移,且躲避所問之辯論本身的終極目的。所以,那不從不虔者之計謀而行的人便是有福的,就是那連踏入此計謀之意願都不曾容許的人:因為凡屬不虔的事,單單思想它就已是罪了。
Their speech, ever bent into a ring and circle of error, holding to nothing and standing firm in nothing, is tossed to and fro in the running and re-running course of an undefined opinion. Their impiety lies in this: to measure God not by God's own declaration but by the will of their own choosing, not knowing that it is no lesser impiety to invent a God than to deny one. When you demand of them to what end of their hope and faith they hold such views, they are confounded, thrown into confusion, dissemble, wander about, and evade the very end of the very disputation about which the question is asked. Blessed therefore is the man who has not walked in this counsel of the impious, that is, who has not admitted that very will of walking in this counsel: for whatever things are impious, even to have thought them is already a crime.
1:55
Sequens autem est, ut qui in impiorum consilio non abiit, in peccatorum quoque uia non stet. plures enim sunt, qui, cum . per confessionem dei ab impietate discreti sint, non tamen a peccato per id liberi sint, in ecclesia quidem manentes, sed ecclesiae disciplinam non tenentes: ut auari, ebriosi, tumultuosi, procaces, superbi, simulatores, mendaces, rapaces. et ad haec quidem nos uitia naturae nostrae propellit instinctus; sed utile est, nos uia hac, ad quam ferimur, abscedere, neque consistere illic, adhibito decedendi ex ea non moroso recursu. et idcirco beatus uir est, qui in uia peccatorum non stetit, natura quidem in uiam hanc deferente, sed ex uia hac fidei religione referente.
此外,接著便有這樣的道理:那不從不虔者之計謀而行的人,也不當站在罪人的道路上。因為有許多人,雖藉著對神的承認而與不虔有別,卻並未因此脫離罪惡,他們固然留在教會之內,卻不守教會的規範:如貪婪的、醉酒的、好亂的、放肆的、驕傲的、假冒為善的、說謊的、勒索的。我們本性的衝動固然驅使我們趨向這些惡習;然而,從我們被帶往的這條道路上退開,不在那裡停留,並在退離時毫不遲疑地折返回來,這乃是有益的。所以,那不站在罪人道路上的人便是有福的:本性固然把他帶入這條道路,但信仰的敬虔卻把他從這道路上帶回來。
It follows, moreover, that he who has not walked in the counsel of the impious should also not stand in the way of sinners. For there are many who, though by the confession of God they are set apart from impiety, are nonetheless not thereby free from sin, remaining indeed within the Church, but not keeping the Church's discipline: such as the greedy, the drunken, the turbulent, the insolent, the proud, the dissemblers, the liars, the rapacious. And to these vices indeed the instinct of our nature drives us; but it is profitable that we depart from this way to which we are carried, and not stand still there, applying an unhesitating return from it as we withdraw. And therefore blessed is the man who has not stood in the way of sinners, nature indeed carrying him into this way, but the religion of faith carrying him back out of it.
1:56
Tertius quoque hic obtinendae beatitudinis ordo est, in cathedra pestilentiae non sedere. sederunt in cathedra Moysi pharissei docentes, sedit et Pilatus in tribunali: cuius itaque cathedrae sessionem existimabimus pestilentem? non utique Moysi. domino sedentes potius quam sessionem cathedrae inprobante, cum dicit: super cathedram, inquit, Moysi sederunt scribse et pharissei; quaecumque dixerint facite. quse autem faciunt, facere nolite. cathedrae huius sessio pestilens non est, cuius oboedientia dominica auctoritate praecipitur. illa ergo erit pestilens. cuius contagium Pilatus manus abluendo deuitat. multos enim etiam in metu dei constitutos saecularium tamen honorum ambitio corrumpit:
得著福分還有第三種次序,就是:不坐在瘟疫的座位上。法利賽人坐在摩西的位上施教,彼拉多也坐在審判台上:那麼,我們該認為坐在哪個座位上是瘟疫呢?當然不是摩西的位。因為主與其說是不許人坐那座位,不如說是不許那些坐者本身,正如祂所說的:「文士和法利賽人坐在摩西的位上,凡他們所吩咐你們的,你們都要遵行;但他們所行的,你們不要照著行。」這座位上的坐位並非瘟疫,因它的順服乃是憑主的權柄所命定的。所以,那彼拉多藉洗手來躲避其污染的,才是瘟疫的座位。因為對屬世尊榮的野心,甚至能敗壞許多敬畏神的人:
This too is the third order for obtaining blessedness: not to sit in the seat of pestilence. In the seat of Moses sat the Pharisees, teaching; Pilate too sat in the tribunal: the sitting in which seat, then, shall we reckon pestilent? Surely not that of Moses. For the Lord, rather than disapproving of sitting in the seat, disapproves those who sit, when He says: Upon the seat of Moses, He says, have sat the scribes and Pharisees; whatever they shall say, do; but what they do, do not do. The sitting in this seat is not pestilent, whose obedience is enjoined by the Lord's own authority. That, therefore, will be pestilent whose contagion Pilate avoids by washing his hands. For the ambition of worldly honors corrupts many even who are set in the fear of God:
1:57
et uolunt ecclesise legibus subditi fori legibus iudicare. sed quamquam ad haec ipsa officia, quse agunt, ferant secum religiosam uoluntatem. beniuolos sese continentesque praestando, tamen necesse est eorum, in quibus deuersabuntur, negotiorum quodam pestilenti contagio polluantur. publicarum enim causarum ordo manere eos uolentes etiam in ecclesiasticae legis sanctitate non patitur. et quamuis religiosi propositi tenaces sint, tamen per necessitatem sedis obtentse tum ad contumeliam, tum ad iniuriam, tum ad pnam cunctante licet uoluntate coguntur, facitque eos necessitas necessitatis ipsius esse participes, cum tamquam lue morbida imbuuntur.
他們雖服在教會的律法之下,卻想要照官府的律法來審判。然而,即便他們把敬虔的心意帶到他們所執行的這些職務上,表現出仁慈自制,仍不免要被他們所經手之事務中某種瘟疫般的污染所玷污。因為公共案件的程序不容許那些願意如此的人,仍舊留在教會律法的聖潔之內。他們縱使極力持守敬虔的志向,卻因所擔任職位的必然性,被迫(雖是不情願的意志)時而施行侮辱、時而加以傷害、時而處以刑罰;這種必然性使他們成為那必然性本身的參與者,因為他們如同染上惡疾般被它浸透了。
and they wish, though subject to the laws of the Church, to judge by the laws of the forum. But although they bring with them a religious will to these very offices which they perform, showing themselves benevolent and self-restrained, yet it is inevitable that they be defiled by a certain pestilent contagion of the affairs in which they are engaged. For the order of public causes does not permit those who wish it to remain even within the sanctity of the ecclesiastical law. And however tenacious they may be of a religious purpose, yet through the necessity of the seat they have obtained they are compelled, with a reluctant will though it be, now to insult, now to injury, now to punishment; and their necessity makes them partakers of that very necessity, since they are imbued with it as with a diseased plague.
1:58
et idcirco hanc eorum cathedram cathedram pestilentiae propheta cognominat, quia contagione sua etiam uoluntatem religiosae mentis inficiat. Sed beatitudinem uiri nondum uel in impiorum consilio non isse, uel in peccatorum uia non stetisse, uel in pestilentiae cathedra non sedisse consummat. possunt enim haec et in saeculari uiro reperiri, ut unum deum esse creatorem mundi opinetur, ut a peccatis se per studium modestae innocentise referat, ut honorum dignitatibus priuatae et tranquillse uitae otia anteponat.
因此,先知稱他們這座位為瘟疫的座位,因為它藉著自身的污染,甚至連敬虔之心的意願也加以感染。然而,先知還未在這人「不曾從不虔者之計謀而行、不曾站在罪人的道路上、不曾坐在瘟疫的座位上」這幾點上,成就他的福分。因為這些事甚至在一個屬世的人身上也可尋見:他可以主張只有一位神,就是世界的創造者;他可以因對端莊無邪的熱心而自制不犯罪;他可以寧取私下安靜生活的閒逸,過於尊位的顯赫。
And therefore the prophet names this seat of theirs the seat of pestilence, because by its contagion it infects even the will of a religious mind. But the prophet does not yet consummate the blessedness of the man in his not having gone into the counsel of the impious, nor stood in the way of sinners, nor sat in the seat of pestilence. For these things can be found even in a worldly man: that he should hold there to be one God the creator of the world, that he should hold himself back from sins by a zeal for modest innocence, that he should prefer the leisure of a private and tranquil life to the dignities of honors.
1:59
sed perfectum nunc deo uirum propheta conformans, et quem in magnis aeternae beatitudinis constituat exemplis, non communibus eum ad id docet usurum esse uirtutibus, sed his consummandum esse, ut beatus sit, quse secuntur: sed in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius. abstentio superiorum inutilis est. nisi in consequentia adhibeatur intentio: scilicet ut in lege domini uoluntas sit. non expectat propheta, ut metus sit. plures enim intra legem metus cohibet, paucos uero uoluntas constituit in lege: quia timoris est, non audere timenda neglegere; perfectae uero religionis est, praescriptis uelle parere. et idcirco beatus ille est, cuius in dei lege non timor est, sed uoluntas.
但如今,先知在塑造一個對神而言完全的人,一個他要立於永恆福分之偉大典範中的人,教導說:這人為著此目的不可只運用尋常的德行,乃必須被以下這些事所成全,好叫他有福,就是:「惟他所喜愛的是耶和華的律法。」單單戒絕上述那些惡是無益的,除非在隨後的事上加上一種心志:就是叫他的意願在於耶和華的律法。先知並不指望只有懼怕。因為懼怕在律法之內約束了許多人,意願卻使少數人立在律法之中:因為屬乎懼怕的,是不敢忽略當懼怕之事;屬乎完全敬虔的,卻是甘心樂意遵行所吩咐的。因此,那對神律法所懷的不是懼怕、乃是意願的人,便是有福的。
But now, molding a man perfect unto God, and one whom he sets among the great examples of eternal blessedness, the prophet teaches that he must not use common virtues for this end, but must be perfected by these things, so that he may be blessed, which follow: But in the law of the Lord was his will. Abstention from the higher evils is useless, unless an intent be applied in what follows: namely, that his will be in the law of the Lord. The prophet does not wait for fear to be present. For fear restrains many within the law, but will establishes few in the law: because it belongs to fear not to dare to neglect things to be feared; but it belongs to perfect religion to be willing to obey what is prescribed. And therefore blessed is he in whose heart there is, toward the law of God, not fear, but will.
1:60
Sed deest interdum et aliquid uoluntati; et perfectam beatitudinem solum uelle non obtinet, nisi uoluntatem sequatur operatio. sequitur namque: et in lege eius meditabitur die a c nocte. beatum hunc uirum continua legis meditatio et indefessa consummat. sed forte id humanae infirmitatis natura non patitur, per quam quiescendum, dormiendum, cibo uacandum est; ob quae a spe consequendae beatitudinis etiam necessitate naturalium decidamus, cum quando a meditatione diurna atque nocturna negotii corporalis intercessione sit desinendum. simile quoque huic dicto apostoli dictum est: sine intermissione orate.
然而,有時連意願也有所缺欠;單單願意並不能得著完全的福分,除非行動隨著意願而來。因為經上接著說:「他晝夜思想這律法。」對律法不倦地持續思想,成全了這有福的人。但或許人性的軟弱不容許這事,因這軟弱使我們必須歇息、睡眠、抽出時間進食;為此我們甚至會因自然之事的必然性而從得福的盼望上跌落,既然我們有時必須因肉身事務的插入,而停止晝夜的思想。與這話相似的,是使徒的一句話:「不住地禱告。」
But sometimes something is lacking even to the will; and merely to will does not obtain perfect blessedness, unless action follows the will. For it follows: And on his law will he meditate day and night. Continual meditation on the law, unwearied, consummates this blessed man. But perhaps the nature of human weakness does not permit this, by which we must rest, sleep, and take time for food; on account of which we would fall away from the hope of attaining blessedness even by the necessity of natural things, since at some time we must cease from meditation both by day and by night through the intervention of bodily business. Similar to this saying is that saying of the Apostle: Pray without ceasing.
1:61
quasi uero non occupanda in res suas naturae nostrae necessitas possit sine interpellatione temporis semper orare. meditatio itaque legis non solum in uerbis legendi est, sed in operis religione; neque ut libros tantum et scripturas recenseamus, sed ut ea, quae scripturis ac libris continentur, gestis rebusque meditemur, et diurna nocturnaque opera legem semper exerceant, ut illud apostoli est: omnia quaecumque facietis in gloriam dei, siue cum manducatis, siue cum bibitis, siue cum aliud agitis. per hoc enim efficitur, ut sine intermissione oremus, cum per opera deo placita et in gloriam eius semper exercitata sancti cuiusque uiri uita omnis oratio sit;
彷彿我們本性的必需,忙於自己的事務,就不能毫無時間中斷地時常禱告似的!所以,對律法的思想不僅在於誦讀的言語,也在於行為的敬虔;並非叫我們只溫習書卷和聖經,乃是叫我們在自己的作為和行動中思想聖經與書卷所含的那些事,並叫我們晝夜的工作總是操練那律法;正如使徒的那句話:「你們或吃或喝,無論作甚麼,都要為榮耀神而行。」因為藉此便成就了我們不住的禱告,既然藉著蒙神喜悅、時常為祂榮耀而作的工,每一位聖徒的全部生活就都是禱告;
As though the necessity of our nature, occupied with its own affairs, could not always pray without any interruption of time! Meditation on the law, therefore, consists not only in the words of reading, but in the religion of works; nor is it that we should merely go over books and Scriptures, but that we should meditate in our deeds and actions upon those things which are contained in the Scriptures and books, and that our works, by day and by night, should always exercise the law; as is that saying of the Apostle: Whatever things you do, do all to the glory of God, whether you eat, or whether you drink, or whether you do anything else. For by this it is brought about that we pray without ceasing, since through works pleasing to God and always exercised unto His glory, the whole life of every holy man is prayer;
1:62
ac sic secundum legem noctu dieque uiuendo uita ipsa nocturna legis erit et diurna meditatio. Sed consummata uiri huius beatitudine, qui impiorum consiliis et peccatorum uiis et pestilentiae cathedra se abstinens dei legem uolens die et nocte meditetur, docendum est, quantus ei fructus adquisitae huius beatitudinis sit futurus. uelle enim beatum esse ex beatitudinis ipsius expectatione proficiscitur. sequitur namque: et erit tamquam li gnum, quod plantatum est secus decursus aquarum, quod fructum suum dabit in tempore suo. et folium eius non decidet. ridiculum hoc forte et ineptum conparata? beatitudinis credetur exemplum:
如此,晝夜按律法而活,生活本身便成了晝夜對律法的思想。既然這人的福分已經成就了──他戒絕不虔者的計謀、罪人的道路和瘟疫的座位,甘心晝夜思想神的律法──如今就當教導:他所得的這福分之果實,將要何等豐盛。因為願意有福,乃是出於對那福分本身的指望。因為經上接著說:「他要像一棵栽在溪水旁的樹,按時候結果子,葉子也不枯乾。」或許有人會以為,這用來比擬福分的例子是可笑而不合宜的:
and thus, living night and day according to the law, life itself will be a nocturnal and diurnal meditation on the law. But now that the blessedness of this man has been consummated—who, abstaining from the counsels of the impious and the ways of sinners and the seat of pestilence, willingly meditates on the law of God day and night—it must be taught how great will be for him the fruit of this blessedness he has acquired. For to will to be blessed proceeds from the expectation of that very blessedness. For it follows: And he shall be like a tree that is planted beside the running of the waters, which will give its fruit in its season. And its leaf shall not fall. Perhaps this will be believed a ridiculous and inept example of the blessedness being compared:
1:63
in quo ligni plantatio, decursus aquarum, fructuum datio, suum tempus et folium non decidens praedicatur. haec quidem secundum homines saeculi nulla forte existimabuntur. sed uideamus secundum propheticam doctrinam, quanta in his ipsis rebus ac uerbis conparatae beatitudinis gloria collocetur. In libro Genesis, ubi plantatum a deo paradisum legislator ostendit, omne quoque lignum specie pulchrum et ad esum bonum productum esse monstrauit; esse quoque et in medio paradiso lignum uitae et lignum sciendi boni et mali exposuit; inrigari deinde paradisum flumine, quod postea in quattuor principia diuisum sit.
其中所宣告的是:樹的栽種、溪水的流淌、果子的結出、它的時候,以及不枯乾的葉子。按這世界的人看來,這些事或許被視為毫無價值。然而,讓我們照著先知的教訓來看:在這些事物與言語中,這被比擬之福分的榮耀被安置得何等重大。在創世記中,立法者顯明神所栽種的樂園時,也顯明各樣悅人眼目、可作食物的樹都被生長出來;他又說明樂園當中有生命樹,和分別善惡的樹;並說樂園有一道河滋潤它,這河後來分為四道源頭。
in which the planting of the tree, the running of the waters, the giving of fruits, its season, and the leaf that does not fall are proclaimed. These things indeed will perhaps be esteemed as nothing according to the men of this world. But let us see, according to the prophetic teaching, how great a glory of the blessedness that is compared is placed in these very things and words. In the book of Genesis, where the lawgiver shows the paradise planted by God, he also showed that every tree fair in appearance and good for food was brought forth; he set forth too that there was in the midst of paradise the tree of life and the tree of knowing good and evil; and that paradise was then watered by a river, which afterward was divided into four heads.
1:64
quod autem esset hoc lignum uitae, propheta Salomon docuit, dicens de adhortatione sapientise: lignum uitae est omnibus, qui conplectuntur eam et qui incumbunt in eam. lignum hoc ergo uiuens est; neque solum uiuens, sed etiam rationale; rationale autem in tantum, ut fructus det, det uero non confuse. non inportune, sed tempore suo. et plantatum hoc lignum est secus decursus aquarum. in possessione scilicet regni dei, id est in paradiso, et unde flumen exiens in quattuor principia diuiditur. non enim ait: post decursus aquarum, sed: secus decursus aquarum, unde primum decursum aquarum diuisiones sortiuntur.
但這生命樹是甚麼,先知所羅門教導了,他論到智慧的勸勉說:「智慧與凡持定她、倚靠她的人,就是生命樹。」所以,這樹是活的;不僅是活的,也是有理性的;且有理性到這地步:它結果子,並且結得不混亂、不失時,乃是按著自己的時候。這樹栽在溪水旁:就是在神國的產業中,也就是在樂園裡,並有一道河從那裡流出,分為四道源頭。因為經上不說「在溪水流淌之後」,乃說「在溪水旁」,就是那些分道從溪水最初流出之處分取其份的地方。
But what this tree of life was, the prophet Solomon taught, saying concerning the exhortation of wisdom: It is a tree of life to all who embrace it and who lean upon it. This tree, therefore, is a living one; and not only living, but also rational; and rational to such a degree that it gives fruit, and gives it not in confusion, not out of season, but in its own season. And this tree is planted beside the running of the waters: namely, in the possession of the kingdom of God, that is, in paradise, and whence a river going out is divided into four heads. For it does not say: after the running of the waters, but: beside the running of the waters, whence the divisions receive their lot at the first running of the waters.
1:65
illic enim plantatum hoc lignum est, quo latronem illum, se dominum confitentem, dominus, qui sapientia est, introducit dicens: amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso. et quia sapientiam, quae Christus est, lignum uitae cognominari de sacramento futurae corporationis et passionis prophetica auctoritate docuimus. etiam ex euangeliis intellegentise huius est proprietas adstruenda. dominus namque ipse se arbori conparauit, cum in Beelzebul daemonia eum Iudsei eicere dixissent: aut facite, inquit, arborem bonam et fructus eius bonos, aut facite arborem malam et fructus eius malos; ei fructu enim arbor cognoscitur.
因為那樹就栽在那裡,主──就是智慧──把那承認祂為主的強盜領進其中,說:「我實在告訴你,今日你要同我在樂園裡了。」我們既已憑先知的權柄教導:那智慧,就是基督,因祂將來成肉身與受難的奧祕而被稱為生命樹,那麼,這種理解的特性也當從福音書中加以確立。因為當猶太人說主是靠別西卜趕鬼時,主自己就把自己比作一棵樹說:「你們或以樹為好,果子也好;或以樹為壞,果子也壞;因為看果子就可以知道樹。」
For there this tree is planted, into which the Lord, who is wisdom, brings that thief who confessed Him as Lord, saying: Amen I say to you, today you shall be with me in paradise. And since we have taught by prophetic authority that wisdom, which is Christ, is called the tree of life, from the mystery of His future incarnation and passion, the property of this understanding must also be established from the Gospels. For the Lord Himself compared Himself to a tree, when the Jews had said that He cast out demons by Beelzebul: Either make, He says, the tree good and its fruits good, or make the tree bad and its fruits bad; for by its fruit the tree is known.
1:66
quia cum fructus esset optimus daemonia eicere, Beelzebul eum, cuius fructus pessimi sunt, esse dicebant. huius quoque beati ligni non dedignatus est in se docere uirtutem, cum pergens ad crucem ait: quia si in humido ligno haec faciunt, in arido quid fiet? per humidi ligni exemplum nihil in se ariditati mortis obnoxium esse significans. Huic itaque ligno beatus ille uir similis fiet, cum, translati latronis in paradisum modo, secundum decursus aquarum et ipse plantetur: et fiet beata illa et non eradicanda nouella plantatio, quam in euangeliis dominus significat, cum de aliena plantatione conqueritur, dicens: omnis plantatio, quam non plantauit pater meus, eradicabitur.
因為既然趕鬼的果子是至美的,他們卻說那結最壞果子的別西卜就是祂。祂也不屑於在自己身上教導這有福之樹的能力,當祂走向十字架時說:「他們在有汁水的樹上尚且如此行,那枯乾的樹將要怎樣呢?」祂藉有汁水之樹的比喻表明,在祂自己裡面沒有絲毫屬於死亡枯乾的東西。所以,那有福的人將要像這樹一樣,當他效法那被領入樂園的強盜,也照樣被栽在溪水旁時:那時便有那有福的、不能被拔出的新栽種,就是主在福音書中所指明的,當祂責備外來的栽種時說:「凡不是我父栽種的,必被拔出來。」
For since the fruit of casting out demons was most excellent, they said that He, whose fruits are worst, was Beelzebul. He did not disdain to teach in Himself also the virtue of this blessed tree, when, going to the cross, He said: For if they do these things in the green wood, what shall be done in the dry? signifying by the example of the green wood that there was in Himself nothing liable to the dryness of death. To this tree, therefore, that blessed man will become like, when, after the manner of the thief transferred into paradise, he too is planted beside the running of the waters; and there will be that blessed and not-to-be-uprooted new planting, which the Lord signifies in the Gospels, when He complains of an alien planting, saying: Every planting which my Father has not planted shall be uprooted.
1:67
hoc ergo lignum dabit fructus suos. ubicumque autem de fructibus arborum aliquid diuinus sermo significat, facere potius eas fructum, quam dare memorat, cum ait: non potest arbor bona malos fructus facere, et cum secundum Esaiam querella de uinea est: expectaui, inquit, ut faceret uuas, fecit autem spinas. lignum autem hoc dabit fructus suos, arbitrio dandi et ratione moderatum. nam in tempore suo dabit. et quo tandem tempore ? nempe eo, de quo beatus apostolus ait: ut notum fa ceret uobis sacramentum uoluntatis suae secundum placitum quod proposuit in ipso, in dispensatione plenitudinis temporum.
所以,這樹要結出它的果子。但凡神的話論到樹的果子時,都寧可說它們「造出」果子、而非「賜出」果子,正如祂所說的:「好樹不能造出壞果子」;又如按以賽亞所記,那對葡萄園的抱怨:「我指望它結好葡萄,反倒結了野葡萄。」但這樹卻要「賜出」它的果子,是憑賜予的抉擇與理性所規範的。因為它要按時候賜出。究竟是甚麼時候呢?當然就是有福的使徒所說的那時候:「照祂在自己所預定的美意,叫我們知道祂旨意的奧祕,要在日期滿足的時候實行。」
This tree, therefore, will give its fruits. But wherever the divine word signifies anything concerning the fruits of trees, it speaks of them rather as making fruit than as giving it, when it says: A good tree cannot make bad fruits; and when, according to Isaiah, there is the complaint about the vineyard: I waited, He says, that it should make grapes, but it made thorns. But this tree will give its fruits, ordered by the choice of giving and by reason. For in its season it will give them. And at what season, then? Surely at that of which the blessed Apostle says: That He might make known to you the mystery of His will, according to His good pleasure which He purposed in Him, in the dispensation of the fullness of the times.
1:68
hoc ergo dispensationis est tempus, quo et accipiendi et dandi oportunitas temperatur, cum suum erit tempus, ut accipiant quibus dabit. temporis autem mora in plenitudine temporum pendet. dispensatio enim dandi fructus plenitudini temporum reseruatur. et qui tandem hic dispendendus erit fructus? nempe ille, de quo idem apostolus meminit, dicens: et transformabit, inquit, corpus humilitatis nostrae conforme corpori gloriae suse. hos ergo nobis fructus suos dabit, quos iam in eo, quem sibi adsumpsit et qui significatur in ligno, homine perfecit, quem in inmortalitatis suae naturam absorpta mortalitate transfudit.
所以,這就是那分賜安排的時候,其中領受與賜予的時機都得著調度,及至其自己的時候來到,好叫祂要施予的人得以領受。但時間的遲延取決於時期的滿足。因為結果子的分賜是保留到時期滿足的時候。那麼,這將要分賜的果子是甚麼呢?當然就是同一位使徒所題的:「祂要按著那能叫萬有歸服自己的大能,將我們這卑賤的身體改變形狀,和祂自己榮耀的身體相似。」所以,這些就是祂要賜給我們的果子,就是祂已經在那位祂所取為己有、並在樹上所表明的人裡面所成全的;祂使朽壞被吞滅,把那人傾注到祂自己不朽的性情之中。
This, therefore, is the time of the dispensation, in which the opportunity both of receiving and of giving is regulated, when its own time shall come, that those to whom He will give may receive. But the delay of time depends on the fullness of the times. For the dispensation of giving fruit is reserved to the fullness of the times. And what, then, will this fruit be that is to be dispensed? Surely that of which the same Apostle makes mention, saying: And He shall transform, he says, the body of our lowliness conformed to the body of His glory. These, therefore, are the fruits He will give us, which He has already perfected in that man whom He took to Himself and who is signified in the tree, whom He poured over into the nature of His own immortality when mortality was swallowed up.
1:69
erit ergo ut hoc lignum beatus ille uir, cum quando ipse in gloria dei domino suo conformis adstiterit. Folium autem ligni huius non defluet. nec mirum si folia eius non defluunt, cuius fructus dabuntur potius, quam decident, non maturitate depulsi, non ui exteriore decussi, sed rationalis officii dispensatione demensi. et quid in foliis significet, ex conparatione rerum corporalium absolutum est. namque hanc esse naturam foliorum contuemur, ut ad custodiam fructuum fructibus ipsis circumiecta prorumpant, ut quodam uallo tenera pomorum initia communiant. doctrina ergo uerborum dei, quae promissos nobis fructus conuestit, significatur in foliis.
所以,那有福的人將要像這樹一樣,及至有時他自己也在神的榮耀中站立,與他的主相似。而這樹的葉子必不凋落。它的葉子不凋落也不足為奇,因為它的果子寧可被賜下、而非墜落──不是被成熟所催落,不是被外力所擊落,乃是按有理性職分的分賜所量定的。至於葉子所表明的,已從對屬物質之事的比較中弄明白了。因為我們觀察到葉子有這樣的本性:它們圍繞果子本身生發出來,為要護衛果子,好像用某種圍籬保護果實柔嫩的初萌。所以,神言語的教訓,就是那為我們遮覆所應許之果子的,便在葉子上得著表明。
That blessed man, therefore, will be like this tree, when at some time he himself shall stand conformed to his Lord in the glory of God. And the leaf of this tree shall not fall away. And no wonder if its leaves do not fall away, whose fruits are given rather than fall down—not driven off by ripeness, not struck off by outward force, but measured out by the dispensation of a rational office. And what the leaves signify has been made clear from the comparison of bodily things. For we observe this to be the nature of leaves: that they burst forth thrown around the fruits themselves for the safeguarding of the fruits, so that with a kind of rampart they may protect the tender beginnings of the fruit. The teaching of the words of God, therefore, which clothes for us the promised fruits, is signified in the leaves.
1:70
his enim uerbis spes nostrae inumbrantur, horum inter has saeculi tempestates munimine conteguntur. non defluent igitur haec folia, id est dei uerba; quia per dominum dictum est: cselum et terra prseteribunt, uerba autem mea non praeteribunt. nihil enim ex his, quse? a deo dicta sunt, dilabetur aut decidet. Quod autem hsec folia ligni huius non inutilia sint, sed salutaria gentibus, sanctus Iohannes in Apocalypsi testatur dicens:
因為藉著這些話,我們的盼望得著蔭庇,並藉它們的護衛,在這世界的風暴中得著遮蓋。所以,這些葉子,就是神的言語,必不凋落;因為主曾說:「天地要廢去,我的話卻不能廢去。」因為凡神所說的話,沒有一句會失落或墜落。而這樹的葉子並非無用、乃是對萬民有益,這一點聖約翰在啟示錄中作見證說:
For by these words our hopes are overshadowed, and by their protection they are covered amid these tempests of the world. These leaves, therefore, that is, the words of God, will not fall away; because it was said by the Lord: Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. For nothing of those things which have been spoken by God shall slip away or fall down. But that these leaves of this tree are not useless, but salutary to the nations, holy John in the Apocalypse testifies, saying:
1:71
et ostendit mihi flumen aquae uitae, splendidum tamquam crystallum, exiens de throno dei et agni, in medio platese eius et ex utraque parte fluminis arborem uitae, quae facit fructum duodecies, singulis mensibus reddens fructum suum, et folia arboris illius sunt ad sanitatem gentium. caeleste sacramentum ita per corporales species exponitur, ut rationem spiritalem corporalia ipsa quamquam inplere non possint, tamen ad corporum rationem mutila sint. conuenerat enim dixisse. ex utraque parte fluminis demonstrati arbores esse, non arborem.
「天使又指示我一道生命水的河,明亮如水晶,從神和羔羊的寶座流出來,在城內街道當中;河的兩邊有生命樹,一年結十二次果子,每月都結出果子;樹上的葉子乃為醫治萬民。」屬天的奧祕就這樣藉著屬物質的形態被陳明,以致這些屬物質之物,雖然不能成全其屬靈的意義,卻在對物體的推理上是有所欠缺的。因為照理,本該說在所指明之河的兩邊有「眾樹」,而非一「棵樹」。
And he showed me a river of the water of life, bright as crystal, going out from the throne of God and of the Lamb, in the midst of its street; and on either side of the river the tree of life, which makes fruit twelve times, rendering its fruit in each several month; and the leaves of that tree are for the healing of the nations. The heavenly mystery is thus set forth through bodily forms, so that the bodily things themselves, although they cannot fulfill the spiritual meaning, are yet, in relation to the reasoning of bodies, defective. For it would have been fitting to have said that on either side of the river demonstrated there were trees, not a tree.
1:72
sed quia uitae arbor ubique in sacramento baptismi una est, undique ad se uenientibus apostolicse praedicationis fructus subministrans, ideo ex utraque parte fluminis una uitae arbor adsistit. unus enim agnus est in dei throno uisus, et unum flumen, et uitae arbor una: quse omnia in se conplectuntur mysteria corporationis, baptismi, passionis, cuius folia, id est prsedicationis uerba, salutem gentibus per doctrinam eloquii non decidentis inpertiunt. Et omnia, inquit, quaecumque faciet, p*rosperabuntur.
但因為在洗禮的奧祕中,生命樹處處是一棵,向從各方來到它跟前的人供應使徒宣講的果子,所以在河的兩邊乃有一棵生命樹站立。因為在神寶座上所見的羔羊是一位,河是一道,生命樹是一棵:這一切在自身之內都含有成肉身、洗禮、受難的奧祕;它的葉子,就是宣講的話語,藉著那永不凋落之言的教導,把救恩賜給萬民。經上又說:「凡他所作的,盡都順利。」
But because the tree of life is everywhere one in the mystery of baptism, supplying the fruit of apostolic preaching to those coming to it from every side, therefore on either side of the river one tree of life stands. For one is the Lamb seen on the throne of God, and one river, and one tree of life: all of which comprise in themselves the mysteries of the incarnation, of baptism, of the passion; whose leaves, that is, the words of preaching, impart salvation to the nations through the teaching of the never-falling utterance. And all things, he says, whatsoever he shall do, shall prosper.
1:73
iam non, sicut in Adam, donum eius et statuta perturbabunturquia ille constitutae inmortalitatis beatitudinem peccato transgressae legis amisit —, sed per redemptionem ligni uitae, id est dominica passione, cum ipsi ligno uitae similes erimus, iam, quidquid in nobis fiet, aeternum est, aeternum autem cum beatitudinis sensu. prosperabuntur enim omnia illa, quae fient: non demutatione incerta, non in natura infirma, cum incorruptio corruptionem et aeternitas infirmitatem et forma dei formam terrenae carnis absorbuerit. huic igitur plantato ligno, in tempore suo hos fructus suos danti, beatus ille uir erit similis, ipse quoque in paradiso plantatus, ut plantatio dei non eradicanda permaneat;
如今,不再像在亞當裡那樣,祂的恩賜與所立的定規會被攪亂──因為那人藉著干犯律法的罪,喪失了為他所立之不朽的福分──乃是藉著生命樹的救贖,就是藉著主的受難,及至我們與生命樹本身相似的時候,如今凡在我們裡面所成就的都是永恆的,且是帶著對福分之知覺的永恆。因為凡所成就的都要順利:不是憑不確定的變遷,不是在軟弱的性情中,既然不朽已吞滅了朽壞、永恆已吞滅了軟弱、神的形狀已吞滅了屬地肉體的形狀。所以,那有福的人將要像這棵栽種的樹、按時候結出它這些果子的樹一樣,他自己也栽於樂園中,好叫神的栽種永存、不被拔出;
Now no longer, as in Adam, will His gift and ordinances be disturbed—because that man lost the blessedness of the immortality established for him by the sin of transgressing the law—but through the redemption of the tree of life, that is, through the Lord's passion, when we shall be like to the tree of life itself, then whatever shall be done in us is eternal, and eternal moreover with the perception of blessedness. For all those things which shall be done shall prosper: not by an uncertain change, not in a weak nature, since incorruption shall have swallowed up corruption, and eternity weakness, and the form of God the form of earthly flesh. To this planted tree, therefore, giving in its season these its fruits, that blessed man will be like, himself also planted in paradise, that the planting of God may remain not to be uprooted;
1:74
in quo omnia a deo facta prospere dirigentur, nulla deinceps demutatione uel infirmitatis nostrae eradicanda uel temporis. Demonstrata autem perfecta huius uiri beatitudine consequens erat, quae impios poena maneret, ostendere. sequitur namque: non sic impii, non sic, sed tamquam puluis, quem proicit uentus a facie terrse. non est impiis conparatiuae huius beatitudinis spes relicta, sed uagum eos. obtritum, uentilatum, dispersum et inquietum manet, ut ex illa corporalis soliditatis firmitate decussi ludibrio pulueris differantur in pnam: non in nihilum dissoluti, ut sit in his materies pnalis, sed in inane ac leue aridumque protriti, ut ludibriosa pnse mobilitate iactentur.
在他裡面,凡神所造的一切都要順利地被引導,此後再無變遷能將他拔出,無論是因我們的軟弱、還是因時間。既已顯明了這人完全的福分,接下來便當顯明有何等刑罰在等候不虔者。因為經上接著說:「不虔者並不是這樣,並不是這樣,乃像風從地面吹散的糠秕。」對不虔者,並無這相比之福分的盼望存留,反倒有漂泊、被碾碎、被風揚、被驅散、不得安寧的境況為他們存留,以致他們從肉身堅實的穩固上被擊落,如塵土般在受戲弄中被驅散以受刑:不是消解為烏有、以致他們裡面無可受刑之物,乃是被碾成空虛、輕浮、乾枯之物,以致他們在刑罰可笑的飄移中被拋來拋去。
in whom all things made by God shall be prosperously directed, with no change thereafter that would uproot him, either through our weakness or through time. But now that the perfect blessedness of this man has been demonstrated, it was consequent to show what punishment awaits the impious. For it follows: Not so the impious, not so, but like the dust which the wind casts from the face of the earth. There is no hope of this comparative blessedness left to the impious, but a wandering, ground-down, wind-tossed, scattered, and restless state remains for them, so that, struck down from the firmness of bodily solidity, they may be dispersed unto punishment in the mockery of dust: not dissolved into nothing, so that there may be in them a material for punishment, but ground into what is empty and light and dry, so that they may be tossed about with the ludicrous mobility of punishment.
1:75
cuius pnse et loco altero idem prophetameminit, dicens: comminuam eos ut puluerem ante faciem uenti, ut lutum platearum delebo illos. conparatio itaque ut beatitudinis, ita et poenae est constituta. quam enim nullus labor est uento puluerem dissipare et quam lutum in plateis ingredientes se prope calcasse non sentiunt, ita pnse illi infernae facile est impios delere atque dispergere, quos peccatorum ratio et in lutum soluerit et comminuerit in puluerem, non relicta neque substantia firmitatis, cum puluis et lutum sint et per id quod puluis et lutum sunt, in naturam tantum poenalis substantiae reseruati.
同一位先知在別處也題到這刑罰說:「我要搗碎他們如同風前的塵土,倒出他們如同街上的泥土。」正如福分,刑罰也是藉比較而陳明的。因為正如風吹散塵土毫不費力,行走街道的人也感覺不到自己貼身踐踏了泥土,那地獄的刑罰要毀滅並驅散不虔者也是這樣容易;這些人被他們罪的算計既消解為泥、又碾碎為塵,毫無堅實之本體存留,既然他們乃是塵土與泥土,且正因他們是塵土與泥土,便單被保留以歸入受刑之本體的性質。
Of which punishment the same prophet makes mention also in another place, saying: I will grind them small as the dust before the face of the wind, I will blot them out like the mire of the streets. Just as the blessedness, so also the punishment is set forth by comparison. For as it is no labor for the wind to scatter dust, and as those entering the streets do not perceive that they have trodden the mire close by, so it is easy for that infernal punishment to destroy and scatter the impious, whom the reckoning of their sins has both dissolved into mire and ground into dust, leaving no substance of firmness, since they are dust and mire, and by that very fact that they are dust and mire, they are reserved only unto the nature of a penal substance.
1:76
Et quia per hanc demutationem obtritae in puluerem firmitatis non erunt eius boni participes, quod beato uiro ex fructu ligni dabitur in tempore, ideo consequenter adiecit: propterea non resurgunt impii in iudicio. non abolitio his, qui utique puluis erunt, per id quod non resurgent denuntiatur, sed resurrectio his in iudicium denegatur. non enim per id quod non erunt, sensu pnse carebunt: quia lucri pnam faciet, quod non subsistet ad pnam. subsistent autem. quia erunt puluis. puluerem uero effici uel ariditate uel adtritu, non est subsistendi amisisse naturam, sed in naturam alteram substitisse.
因為藉著這被碾成塵土之堅實的變遷,他們必不得有份於那將要按時候從樹的果子賜給有福之人的美善,先知便隨即加上說:「因此,不虔者必不能在審判中站立得住。」對這些終必成為塵土的人,並非藉著他們不能復起而宣告其被消滅,乃是拒絕給他們復起受審。因為他們並不因「他們將不復存在」而免受刑之知覺:因為若他們不存留以受刑,那反倒使刑罰成了得益。然而他們必要存留,因為他們必成塵土。而被造成塵土,無論是因乾枯還是磨損,並非喪失了存留的性質,乃是存留成了另一種性質。
And because through this change of firmness ground into dust they will not be partakers of that good which shall be given to the blessed man in its season from the fruit of the tree, therefore he consequently added: Therefore the impious shall not rise again in the judgment. It is not abolition that is announced to these, who indeed will be dust, through the fact that they shall not rise again, but resurrection unto judgment is denied to them. For it is not through the fact that they will not be that they will lack the perception of punishment: because it would make of punishment a gain, that they should not subsist unto punishment. But they will subsist, because they will be dust. But to be made dust, whether by dryness or by attrition, is not to have lost the nature of subsisting, but to have subsisted into another nature.
1:77
per id autem, quod in iudicium non resurgent, absolutum est non resurgendi eos caruisse natura, sed resurgendi in iudicium ordinem perdidisse. qui autem resurrectionis et iudicii ordo intellegendus sit, dominus in euangeliis ostendit dicens: qui credit in me, non iudicatur: qui autem non credit, iam iudicatus est. hoc est autem iudicium, quia lux uenit in hunc mundum. et dilexerunt homines magis tenebras quam lumen. Neglegentem audientium et incuriosam legentium facilitatem dicti dominici sermo perturbat. cum enim dicit: qui credit in me, non iudicabitur, exemit iudicio fideles; et cum subiecit: qui autem non credit, iam iudicatus est, non admisit ad iudicium infideles.
然而,藉著他們不能復起受審這一事實,便弄明白了:他們並非被剝奪了復起的本性,乃是喪失了復起受審的次序。至於復活與審判的次序當如何理解,主在福音書中顯明了,說:「信我的,不被審判;不信的,罪已經定了。定他們的罪就是光來到世間,世人卻愛黑暗過於光。」主這話攪動了疏忽之聽者的懶散、與不留心之讀者的怠惰。因為當祂說「信我的必不被審判」時,祂使信的人免於審判;當祂接著說「不信的罪已經定了」時,祂又不容不信的人上前受審。
But through the fact that they shall not rise again unto judgment, it is made clear that they have not been deprived of the nature of rising again, but have lost the order of rising unto judgment. And what the order of resurrection and judgment is to be understood to be, the Lord shows in the Gospels, saying: He who believes in me is not judged; but he who does not believe is already judged. And this is the judgment, that light came into this world, and men loved darkness rather than light. The Lord's saying disturbs the negligent ease of hearers and the incurious ease of readers. For when He says: He who believes in me shall not be judged, He exempted the faithful from judgment; and when He subjoined: But he who does not believe is already judged, He did not admit the unfaithful to judgment.
← 上一段下一段 →
第 2 章 →
123456789