← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 論三位一體與詩篇釋義
普瓦捷的希拉里
論三位一體與詩篇釋義 第 6 章
拉丁文原文．7 節．部分字詞可點開查義
6:1
ex Collectaneis Antiarianis Parisinis et Appendice (Libro I ad Constantium) per coniecturam dispositi. LIBER I (scriptus a. 356). Praefatio = Series B I (supra p. 98—102). De synodo Arelatensi et de exsilio Paulini episcopi Treuirensis (deest, cf. Studien 1 83). ∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ Epistula synodi Sardicensis Orientalium cum symbolo et nominibus episcoporum, qui subscripserunt (c. 9 est decurtatum; deest narratio de Paulo episcopo Constantinopolitano, d. Studien I 184) — Ser. A IV (supra p. 48-78). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗ Uaria ex actis synodi Sardicensis Occidentalium, duae epistulae Ualentis et Ursacii, symbolum Nicaenum una cum textu narratiuo (n. 9 c.
（此處諸篇乃憑推斷，從《巴黎反亞流文集》及其附錄——即〈致君士坦提烏斯第一書〉——中編排而成。）第一卷（寫於主後三五六年）。序言＝乙系列一（見上文，第98至102頁）。論亞爾勒會議及特里爾主教保利努斯的放逐（此段闕失；參《研究》卷一83）。＊＊＊東方諸主教撒爾狄卡會議的書信，附信經及簽署的主教名單（第九章被刪節；論君士坦丁堡主教保羅的敘述闕失；參《研究》卷一184）＝甲系列四（見上文，第48至78頁）。＊＊＊取自西方諸主教撒爾狄卡會議紀錄的雜項：瓦倫斯與烏爾撒基烏斯的兩封書信，尼西亞信經連同一段敘事本文（第九項，第……）。
(Pieces arranged by conjecture out of the Parisian Anti-Arian Collections and the Appendix, the First Book to Constantius.) BOOK I (written A.D. 356). Preface = Series B I (above, pp. 98-102). On the Synod of Arles and on the exile of Paulinus, bishop of Trier (missing; cf. Studien I 83). * * * The letter of the Sardican synod of the Easterners, with the creed and the names of the bishops who subscribed (chapter 9 is abridged; the account of Paul, bishop of Constantinople, is missing; cf. Studien I 184) = Series A IV (above, pp. 48-78). * * * Various matters from the acts of the Sardican synod of the Westerners: two letters of Valens and Ursacius, the Nicene creed together with a narrative text (n. 9 c.
6:2
1 est decurtatum; uidetur enim deesse symbolum Sirmiense atque initium refutationis, cf. supra p. 146. praeterea excidit ante primam epistulam synodi certe textus Hilarii, quo dispositionem textus narratiui insequentis indicabat, cf. Studien I 97) = Ser. B 11 (supra p. 103-154). Oratio synodi Sardicensis Occidentalium ad Constantium imperatorem una cum textu narratiuo = Liber, qui uulgo dicitur I ad Constantium imperatorem, 1-7 (supra p. 181-186). I)e synodo Mediolanensi: textus narratiuus (decurtatus in fine, cf. Studien I 149) = Liber, qui uulgo dicitur 1 ad Constantium, 8 (supra p. 186 sq.).
……第一項被刪節；因為西爾米烏姆信經以及駁斥的開端似乎闕失；參見上文第146頁。此外，在會議的第一封書信之前，必定遺失了希拉里的一段本文，他在其中指明後續敘事本文的編排；參《研究》卷一97）＝乙系列二（見上文，第103至154頁）。西方諸主教撒爾狄卡會議致君士坦提烏斯皇帝的演說，連同一段敘事本文＝一般稱為〈致君士坦提烏斯皇帝第一書〉的第一至七章（見上文，第181至186頁）。論米蘭會議：敘事本文（末尾被刪節；參《研究》卷一149）＝一般稱為〈致君士坦提烏斯第一書〉的第八章（見上文，第186頁及其後）。
1 is abridged; for the Sirmian creed and the beginning of the refutation seem to be missing; cf. above, p. 146. Moreover, before the first letter of the synod there has certainly fallen out a text of Hilary in which he indicated the arrangement of the following narrative text; cf. Studien I 97) = Series B II (above, pp. 103-154). The oration of the Sardican synod of the Westerners to the emperor Constantius, together with a narrative text = the Book commonly called the First to the Emperor Constantius, chapters 1-7 (above, pp. 181-186). On the Synod of Milan: a narrative text (abridged at the end; cf. Studien I 149) = the Book commonly called the First to Constantius, chapter 8 (above, pp. 186 f.).
6:3
∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ \'LIBER II (scriptus hieme 359/360). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ De Liberio episcopo Romano: Epistula dubia Liberio ad Orientales episcopos Studens paci una cum textu narratiuo (deest textus narratiuus epistulae praemissus, cf. Studien I 167) = Series B III (supra p. 155 sq.). Epistula Liberii ad Constantium imperatorem Obsecro = Ser. A VII (supra p. 89-93). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ Epistulae Liberii Quamuis sub, Nolo te rex parte), Inter haec (ex parte) et epistulae dubiae Pro deifico, Quia scio, Non doceo una cum textu narratiuo = Ser. B VII (supra p. 164—173).
＊＊＊第二卷（寫於三五九至三六〇年冬）。＊＊＊論羅馬主教里貝里烏斯：里貝里烏斯致東方諸主教、可疑的〈致力於和平〉一函，連同一段敘事本文（置於此信之前的敘事本文闕失；參《研究》卷一167）＝乙系列三（見上文，第155頁及其後）。里貝里烏斯致君士坦提烏斯皇帝的〈我懇求〉一函＝甲系列七（見上文，第89至93頁）。＊＊＊里貝里烏斯的諸函：〈雖然在……之下〉、〈王啊，我不願你〉（部分）、〈在這其間〉（部分），以及可疑的諸函〈為著神所定的〉、〈因我知道〉、〈我不教導〉，連同一段敘事本文＝乙系列七（見上文，第164至173頁）。
* * * BOOK II (written in the winter of 359/360). * * * On Liberius, bishop of Rome: the doubtful letter of Liberius to the Eastern bishops, 'Studens paci,' together with a narrative text (the narrative text prefixed to the letter is missing; cf. Studien I 167) = Series B III (above, pp. 155 f.). The letter of Liberius to the emperor Constantius, 'Obsecro' = Series A VII (above, pp. 89-93). * * * The letters of Liberius, 'Quamuis sub,' 'Nolo te rex' (in part), 'Inter haec' (in part), and the doubtful letters 'Pro deifico,' 'Quia scio,' 'Non doceo,' together with a narrative text = Series B VII (above, pp. 164-173).
6:4
∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ De synodi Ariminensis et Seleuciensis: Epistula Constantii imperatoris ad episcopos synodi Ariminensis = Ser. A VIII (supra p. 93 sq.). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ Ex actis synodi Ariminensis: Definitio episcoporum homousianorum, textus narratiuus, damnatio haereticorum = Ser. A IX (supra p. 95—97). ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗ x Epistula synodi Ariminensis ad Constantium imperatorem et gesta Nicaena una cum textu narratiuo (sequebatur forte symbolum Nicaena Thraciae propositum, cf. Studien I 76 sq.) = Ser. A V supra p. 78—86). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ Epistula episcoporum Arianorum, qui synodo Ariminen.
＊＊＊論里米尼會議與塞琉基亞會議：君士坦提烏斯皇帝致里米尼會議諸主教的書信＝甲系列八（見上文，第93頁及其後）。＊＊＊取自里米尼會議紀錄：同質論諸主教的定義、一段敘事本文、對異端的定罪＝甲系列九（見上文，第95至97頁）。＊＊＊里米尼會議致君士坦提烏斯皇帝的書信，及尼西亞的議事紀錄，連同一段敘事本文（其後或許接著呈給色雷斯的尼西亞信經；參《研究》卷一76頁及其後）＝甲系列五（見上文，第78至86頁）。＊＊＊出席里米尼會議的亞流派諸主教的書信……
* * * On the Synods of Rimini and Seleucia: the letter of the emperor Constantius to the bishops of the synod of Rimini = Series A VIII (above, pp. 93 f.). * * * From the acts of the synod of Rimini: the definition of the Homoousian bishops, a narrative text, the condemnation of the heretics = Series A IX (above, pp. 95-97). * * * The letter of the synod of Rimini to the emperor Constantius and the Nicene proceedings, together with a narrative text (there perhaps followed the Nicene creed proposed to Thrace; cf. Studien I 76 f.) = Series A V (above, pp. 78-86). * * * The letter of the Arian bishops who were present at the synod of Rimini...
6:5
i inter- ■ erant, ad Constantium imperatorem = Ser. A VI (supra p. 87 sq.). ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗ Epistula legatorum synodi Seleuciensis ad legatos synodi Ariminensis una cum textu narratiuo (ante epistulam excidit textus narratiuus, qui \'librum Ualentis et Ualentis\' interpretabatur, cf. Studien Illlsq.) = Ser. B VIII (supra p. 174—177). x ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ LIBER III .(scriptus a. 367). x ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ Epistula synodi Parisiensis ad episcopos Orientales = Ser. A I (supra p. 43—46).
……致君士坦提烏斯皇帝＝甲系列六（見上文，第87頁及其後）。＊＊＊塞琉基亞會議使節致里米尼會議使節的書信，連同一段敘事本文（在此信之前，遺失了那闡釋「瓦倫斯與瓦倫斯之書」的敘事本文；參《研究》卷一111頁及其後）＝乙系列八（見上文，第174至177頁）。＊＊＊第三卷（寫於主後三六七年）。＊＊＊巴黎會議致東方諸主教的書信＝甲系列一（見上文，第43至46頁）。
...to the emperor Constantius = Series A VI (above, pp. 87 f.). * * * The letter of the legates of the synod of Seleucia to the legates of the synod of Rimini, together with a narrative text (before the letter there has fallen out the narrative text which interpreted the 'book of Valens and Valens'; cf. Studien I 111 f.) = Series B VIII (above, pp. 174-177). * * * BOOK III (written A.D. 367). * * * The letter of the synod of Paris to the Eastern bishops = Series A I (above, pp. 43-46).
6:6
∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗x Epistula Eusebii episcopi Uercellensis ad Gregorium episcopum Eliberitanum = Ser. A II (supra p, 46 sq.). ∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ Epistulae duae de reconciliandis episcopis lapsis = Ser. H IV (supra p. 156—159). ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ De Germinio episcopo Sirmiensi: Ex epistula Germinii ad episcopos Arianos: symbolum Germinii (excidit ipsa epistula, cf. Studien I 103) = Ser. A III (supra p. 47 sq.). ∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗ w ∗ ∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ Epistula Ualentis, Ursacii, Gaii et Pauli ad Germinium = Ser. B V (supra p. 159 sq.).
＊＊＊維爾切利主教尤西比烏斯致埃爾維拉主教格里高利的書信＝甲系列二（見上文，第46頁及其後）。＊＊＊論使墮落主教復和的兩封書信＝乙系列四（見上文，第156至159頁）。＊＊＊論西爾米烏姆主教革爾米尼烏斯：取自革爾米尼烏斯致亞流派諸主教書信中的、革爾米尼烏斯的信經（書信本身闕失；參《研究》卷一103）＝甲系列三（見上文，第47頁及其後）。＊＊＊瓦倫斯、烏爾撒基烏斯、蓋烏斯與保羅致革爾米尼烏斯的書信＝乙系列五（見上文，第159頁及其後）。
* * * The letter of Eusebius, bishop of Vercelli, to Gregory, bishop of Elvira = Series A II (above, pp. 46 f.). * * * Two letters on the reconciliation of lapsed bishops = Series B IV (above, pp. 156-159). * * * On Germinius, bishop of Sirmium: from the letter of Germinius to the Arian bishops, the creed of Germinius (the letter itself has fallen out; cf. Studien I 103) = Series A III (above, pp. 47 f.). * * * The letter of Valens, Ursacius, Gaius, and Paul to Germinius = Series B V (above, pp. 159 f.).
6:7
∗ ∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ Epistula Germinii ad Kufianum, Palladium et ceteros = Ser. B VI (supra p. 160—164). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗
＊＊＊革爾米尼烏斯致魯非安努斯、帕拉狄烏斯及其餘諸人的書信＝乙系列六（見上文，第160至164頁）。＊＊＊
* * * The letter of Germinius to Rufianus, Palladius, and the rest = Series B VI (above, pp. 160-164). * * *