📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 論三位一體與詩篇釋義

普瓦捷的希拉里

論三位一體與詩篇釋義 第 1 章 第 4/55 段

拉丁文原文.37 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 1:116–1:152(全章共 2058 節)

第 2 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
1:116
natio uiperarum, quis monstrauit uobis fugere a futura ira? cum enim debitum illis esset ob impietatem suam pnse constitutione puniri, iram tamen hanc futuram psenitentise confessione fugiebant apostolus quoque irse huius ita meminit, dicens: quia si. cum adhuc peccatores essemus, Christus pro nobis mortuus est, multo magis iustificati nunc per sanguinem eius liberabimur per illum ab ira, iram uidelicet pnam manentis constitutionis ostendens. Non itaque ad demutationem deus mobilis est neque ad aliud ex alio transferendus: cum certae ipse constantisque naturae est, manet ut est, quippe qui dixerit: ego sum qui 15 Matth. m, 7; Luc. IJI; 7. 19 Rom. V, 10. 26 Exod. III, 14.
「毒蛇的種類!誰指示你們逃避將來的忿怒呢?」因為他們既因自己的不虔,理當受刑罰之定規的懲罰,卻藉悔改的認罪逃避這將來的忿怒。使徒也如此提到這忿怒,說:「因為我們作罪人的時候,基督為我們死;現在我們既靠著祂的血稱義,就更要藉著祂免去神的忿怒。」——就是指明這忿怒乃是那存留之定規的刑罰。故此,神並非可變動而至於改變,也不可從一事被移轉為另一事:因祂自己有確定不變的本性,祂始終如祂所是,正如祂所說:「我是自有永有的,我並不改變。」
'O generation of vipers, who hath shown you to flee from the wrath to come?' For since it was owing to them, on account of their impiety, to be punished by the appointment of penalty, they nevertheless were fleeing this wrath to come by the confession of repentance. The apostle also thus makes mention of this wrath, saying: 'For if, when we were yet sinners, Christ died for us, much more, being now justified by His blood, shall we be saved from wrath through Him' — showing, namely, the wrath to be the penalty of an abiding ordinance. God is therefore not movable to change, nor to be transferred from one thing to another: since He Himself is of a sure and constant nature, He remains as He is, seeing that He said: 'I am who I am, and I change not.'
1:117
sum et non demutor. beata illa et perfecta aeternaeque uirtutis bonitas non patitur conuersionem nec demutatur ei alio in aliud motu accidentis instinctus. et hoc hic idem sic sancto spiritu loquens propheta testatur, dicens: deus iustus iudex, fortis et magnanimus, numquid irascetur per singulos dies? nisi conuertimini, gladium . suum uibrauit, arcum suum tetendit et parauit illum; et in ipso parauit uasa mortis, sagittas suas arsuris operatus est. non ergo ad iram magnanimus demutatur, sed potens iudex poenam decreuit ad culpam. nam non conuertentibus gladium uibrauit et arcum tetendit et in eo parauit uasa mortis, sagittas suas arsuris operatus est.
永恆美德那蒙福完全的良善,不受轉變,也不因任何偶性的衝動、將它從一事挪移至另一事而改變。先知在此也證明了這同一件事,如此藉聖靈說:「神是公義的審判者,是大有能力、又滿有寬容的;祂豈是天天發怒麼?若人不回頭,祂就必磨快祂的刀,張弓搭箭,預備妥當;祂也預備了殺人的器械,把箭做成能燒著人的。」故此,那滿有寬容的一位並非變為忿怒,而是那大能的審判者為罪過定下刑罰。因為對那些不肯回頭的人,祂磨快了刀、張了弓,在弓上預備殺人的器械,把箭做成能燒著人的。
That blessed and perfect goodness of eternal virtue does not suffer conversion, nor is it changed by the impulse of any accident moving it from one thing to another. And this same thing the prophet here attests, thus speaking by the Holy Spirit, saying: 'God is a just judge, strong and long-suffering; will He be angry every day? Unless ye be converted, He hath brandished His sword, He hath bent His bow and made it ready; and in it He hath prepared instruments of death, He hath wrought His arrows for them that shall burn.' The long-suffering One, then, is not changed unto wrath, but the mighty judge has decreed penalty for guilt. For upon those who would not be converted He brandished the sword and bent the bow, and in it prepared instruments of death, and wrought His arrows for them that shall burn.
1:118
operatus autem est non ad motum irae repentinae, quse per cupiditatem ulciscendi subito accensa sit, sed operatus arsuris est, qui per inpaenitentem uoluntatem ipsi se constituent urendos. et his, qui non conuerterentur, gladius uibratus est, non ex demutatione irae promendus ad singulosneque enim, qui magnanimus est, per dies singulos irascitursed quia iudicium decreuit, gladius eius ex pnse constitutione iam promptus est. psa autem pnalis iudicii spiritalia ministeria in gladio, arcu, sagittisque memorantur; quae quia praeparata.
但祂造這些不是憑突發忿怒的衝動、因報復之慾而驟然點燃,而是為那些將被燒著的人而造,就是那些憑不肯悔改的意志、自定要被焚燒的人。對那些不肯回頭的人,刀被磨快,並非因忿怒的改變而拔出來對付個別的人——因那滿有寬容的並非天天發怒——而是因祂已定下審判,祂的刀已因刑罰的定規而拔出。刑罰審判的屬靈執事,被描述為刀、弓與箭;這些既為那將被燒著的人預備妥當,
But He wrought them not by a motion of sudden wrath, kindled suddenly through a desire of avenging, but He wrought them for those that shall burn, who by their impenitent will appoint themselves to be burned. And for those who would not be converted the sword was brandished, not to be drawn against individuals from a change of wrath — for He who is long-suffering is not angry day by day — but because He decreed judgment, His sword is already drawn from the appointment of the penalty. But the spiritual ministries of penal judgment are mentioned in the sword, the bow, and the arrows; which, because they are held ready for those that shall burn,
1:119
habentur arsuris, non ex motu irse temporariae praeparantur, sed ea ex decreti constitutione temperatissima deus bonitatis suae aequabilitate moderatus est: non occultam scilicet constitutionis ipsius huius seueritatem et incognitam relinquendo, terroremque eius denuntiationibus praemonendo, et ipsam illam, constitutam licet, longa tamen ad peccati psenitentiam dilatione remorando. Atque ideo, posteaquam fremuerunt gentes et adstiterunt reges, posteaquam inania meditantes populi in unum conuenerunt aduersus dominum Christumque eius et posteaquam inrisi subsannatique sunt, subiectum est: tunc loquetur ad eos in ira sua et in indignatione sua conturbabit eos.
就不是出於一時忿怒的衝動而預備的,而是神出於祂定規的安排,以祂良善至為調和的均平來節制它們:就是說,祂並未把這定規本身的嚴厲隱藏而不為人知,反倒藉祂的宣告預先警告其可畏,並藉長久延遲,把那雖已定下的刑罰延緩,好待人為罪悔改。因此,在外邦人爭鬧、君王起來之後,在謀算虛妄之事的萬民聚集為一敵擋主和祂的受膏者之後,並在他們被譏笑、被嗤笑之後,便接著說:「那時,祂要在怒中責備他們,在烈怒中驚嚇他們。」
are not prepared from a motion of temporary wrath, but God has moderated them, out of the appointment of His decree, by the most tempered equableness of His goodness: not, namely, leaving the severity of this very ordinance hidden and unknown, but forewarning of its terror by His denunciations, and delaying that very appointed penalty, though appointed, by a long postponement unto repentance for sin. And therefore, after the nations raged and the kings stood up, after the peoples meditating vain things gathered together as one against the Lord and His Christ, and after they were derided and mocked, there was subjoined: 'Then shall He speak to them in His wrath, and in His indignation shall He trouble them.'
1:120
q qualiter autem loqui semper in ira sua dominus solitus sit, coam propheticae doctrinae grauissimum et maximum adferemus . exemplum, Esaia dicente : audite uerbum domini, principes Sodomum; adtendite uerbum dei, populus Gomorrhse. quo mihi multitudinem hostiarum uestrarum? dicit dominus; plenus sum. holocausta arietum et adipem agnorum et sanguinem taurorum et hircorum nolo; nec si ueniatis apparere in conspectu meo- quis enim exquisiuit hsec de manibusuestris? — calcare aulam meam non adponetis. si adferatis similaginem, uanum est; thymiama abominatio mihi est. neomenias et sabbata et diem magnum non sustineo, ieiunium et ferias et neomenias uestras et festiuitates odit anima mea.
但主素來如何在祂的怒中說話,我們要從先知的教訓中舉出一個最為沉重、最為重大的例子,以賽亞說:「所多瑪的官長啊,你們要聽耶和華的話!蛾摩拉的百姓啊,你們要側耳聽神的訓誨!耶和華說:你們所獻的許多祭物與我何益呢?我已經夠了。公羊的燔祭和肥畜的脂油,我都不喜悅;公牛、羊羔的血,我也不喜悅;你們來朝見我,誰向你們討這些,使你們踐踏我的院宇呢?你們不要再踐踏了。你們若獻上細麵,也是枉然;香品是我所憎惡的。月朔、安息日和大日,我都不能容忍;你們的禁食、節期、月朔並你們的節慶,我心裡恨惡。」
But in what manner the Lord is wont always to speak in His wrath, we shall bring a most weighty and greatest example from prophetic teaching, Isaiah saying: 'Hear the word of the Lord, ye princes of Sodom; give ear to the word of God, ye people of Gomorrah. To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the Lord; I am full. The holocausts of rams, and the fat of lambs, and the blood of bulls and of goats, I will not have; nor if ye come to appear before me — for who hath required these things at your hands? — ye shall not tread my court again. If ye bring fine flour, it is in vain; incense is an abomination to me. The new moons and sabbaths and the great day I will not endure; the fasting and the holidays and your new moons and your festivals my soul hateth.'
1:121
facti estis mihi in abundantiam, iam non sustineo peccata uestra. cum extendatis manus uestras, auertam oculos meos a uobis; et si multiplicetis precem, non exaudiam uos: manus enim uestrse sanguine plenae sunt. et haec quidem atrocia et plena irse, principes Sodomum generosam Abrahae familiam nuncupari, populum Gomorrhse electum in hereditatem Israhel dici, inprobabiles esse hostias, abominabiles sollemnitates, pertsesa ieiunia. auertendi ab aspectu adeuntium oculi, obstruendae ab auditu precantium aures, quia manus sanguine plense sint: quid hac comminatione grauius est? quid his minis seuerius? sed uideamus, qualiter in ira sua deus loquatur. Sequitur enim, posteaquam dictum est:
「這些成了我的重擔,我擔當得不耐煩。你們舉手禱告,我必遮眼不看你們;就是你們多多地祈禱,我也不聽:你們的手都滿了殺人的血。」這些話的確是可畏且充滿忿怒的——亞伯拉罕高貴的家族竟被稱為所多瑪的官長,那被揀選為產業的百姓以色列竟被稱為蛾摩拉的百姓;祭物不蒙悅納,節慶可憎,禁食令人厭煩;對前來之人要轉眼不看,對祈禱之人要塞耳不聽,因他們的手滿了血:有甚麼比這恐嚇更重的呢?有甚麼比這威嚇更嚴厲的呢?但讓我們看看神在祂怒中如何說話。因為在說了這話之後,接著便有:
'They are become a burden to me, I am weary of bearing your sins. When ye stretch forth your hands, I will turn away mine eyes from you; and though ye multiply prayer, I will not hear you: for your hands are full of blood.' And these things indeed are dreadful and full of wrath — that the noble family of Abraham should be called princes of Sodom, that the people chosen as an inheritance, Israel, should be called the people of Gomorrah; that the sacrifices are unapprovable, the solemnities abominable, the fasts wearisome; that the eyes are to be turned away from the sight of those who approach, the ears to be stopped from the hearing of those who pray, because their hands are full of blood: what is graver than this threatening? what more severe than these menaces? But let us see in what manner God speaks in His wrath. For it follows, after it was said:
1:122
manus uestrse sanguine plenae sunt, lauamini, mundi estote, auferte nequitias ab animis uestris, a conspectu oculorum meorum. discite bonum facere, exquirite iudicium, liberate iniuriam accipientem, iudicate pupillo et iustificate uiduam: et uenite, disputemus, dicit dominus. et si fuerint delicta uestra sicut phnicium, ut niuem dealbabo: si autem fuerint ut coccum, ut lanam candidam efficiam. et Hi uolueritis et exaudieritis me, quae bona sunt terrse manducabitis: quod si nolueritis neque audiueritis me, gladius uos comedet. os enim domini locutum est haec. sequitur terrorem benignitas. et quibus iam ultio criminis debita est, his adhuc superest psenitentis conscientiae beata confessio.
「你們的手滿了殺人的血;你們要洗濯、自潔,從你們的心中、從我眼前除掉你們的惡行。要學習行善,尋求公平,解救受欺壓的,給孤兒伸冤,為寡婦辨屈。耶和華說:你們來,我們彼此辯論。你們的罪雖像硃紅,我必使它白如雪;雖紅如丹顏,我必使它白如羊毛。你們若甘心聽從,必吃地上的美物;若不聽從,反倒悖逆,必被刀劍吞滅。這是耶和華親口說的。」慈愛隨恐嚇而來。對那些已當受罪之報應的人,仍存留著悔罪良心那蒙福的認罪。
'Your hands are full of blood; wash you, be clean, put away your iniquities from your souls, from before mine eyes. Learn to do good, seek judgment, deliver him that suffers wrong, judge for the fatherless and justify the widow: and come, let us reason together, saith the Lord. And if your sins be as scarlet, I will make them white as snow: but if they be as crimson, I will make them white as wool. And if ye be willing and hearken to me, ye shall eat the good things of the land: but if ye be unwilling and hear me not, the sword shall devour you. For the mouth of the Lord hath spoken these things.' Kindness follows terror. And to those to whom vengeance for their crime is already due, there yet remains the blessed confession of a penitent conscience.
1:123
non enim statim deus in ira sua perimit, sed loquitur et dissimulata adhuc poena tantum in indignatione perturbat. qui enim ut coccum et phoenicium erant. redundanti in manus sanguine decolores, hi in niuem albescent eruntque ueste beati uelleris candidati. et haec quidem ex auctoritate Testamenti ueteris praesumpta sint: uideamus. an etiam in nouo dei ira talis esse intellegatur, ut saluet. Namque lohannis eos. quos esse nationem uiperarum ob malit-iam paternse se impietatis exprobrat ita ad salutem monet: facite dignum fructum psenitentise. et rursum dominus ipse: uenite ad me omnes, qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego uos reficiam.
因為神不立刻在祂怒中殺滅,而是說話,並且刑罰仍暫緩,只在祂的烈怒中驚嚇他們。因為那些因血溢流到手上而像丹顏、硃紅般變色的人,這些人卻要白如雪,並要披上蒙福羊毛的衣裳。這些話的確取自舊約的權威:讓我們看看,在新約中神的忿怒是否也被理解為如此的一種,以致可以拯救。因為約翰勸那些他因其祖宗不虔之惡而斥為毒蛇種類的人歸向救恩,說:「你們要結出果子來,與悔改的心相稱。」主自己又說:「凡勞苦擔重擔的人,可以到我這裡來,我就使你們得安息。」
For God does not straightway slay in His wrath, but He speaks and, the penalty being still deferred, only troubles them in His indignation. For those who were discolored like crimson and scarlet with the blood overflowing onto their hands, these shall grow white as snow and shall be robed in the garment of a blessed fleece. And these things indeed have been taken from the authority of the Old Testament: let us see whether also in the New the wrath of God is understood to be of such a kind that it may save. For John admonishes unto salvation those whom he reproaches as being a generation of vipers on account of the malice of their fathers' impiety, thus: 'Bring forth fruit worthy of repentance.' And again the Lord Himself: 'Come unto me all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will refresh you.'
1:124
frementibus autem aduersus se et non tantum in passione, sed etiam post passionem, non dico in unum conuenientibus, sed persecutionem ecclesiae, apostolorum fugam, caedem martyrum spirantibus deus sic loquitur iratus: Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris? ait autem: quis es, domine? dominus uero: ego sum Iesus Nazareus, quem tu persequeris. at ille tremesetpauens in eo, quod sibi acciderat, dixit: domine, quid me uis facere? sic loquitur iratus. sic in indignatione conturbat, cum, quibus ob meritum impietatis poena decreta est, ipsis per admonitionem desinendi metus et terror adfertur.
但對那些向祂爭鬧的人——不僅在受難中,甚至在受難之後,我說,他們不僅聚集為一,更噴吐出對教會的逼迫、對使徒的追逐、對殉道者的屠殺——神便如此在怒中說話:「掃羅!掃羅!你為甚麼逼迫我?」他說:「主啊,你是誰?」主說:「我就是你所逼迫的拿撒勒人耶穌。」他因所遭遇的事而戰兢驚惶,說:「主啊,你要我做甚麼?」祂如此在怒中說話,如此在烈怒中驚嚇,即當那些因不虔之報應而被定刑罰的人,藉著勸他們停止的警戒,被帶來畏懼與驚恐時。
But to those who rage against Him — and not only in the Passion, but even after the Passion, not, I say, gathering together as one, but breathing out persecution of the Church, the flight of the apostles, the slaughter of martyrs — God thus speaks in wrath: 'Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?' And he said: 'Who art thou, Lord?' But the Lord: 'I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest.' And he, trembling and afraid at what had befallen him, said: 'Lord, what wilt thou have me to do?' Thus He speaks in wrath, thus He troubles in indignation, when to those very ones for whom penalty is decreed on account of the merit of their impiety, fear and terror are brought through an admonition to desist.
1:125
Sed ne ipsam quidem principalem et maximam loquendi in ira et in indignatione conturbandi praedicationem praetermisit propheta. namque post idquodait: tunc loquetur ad eos in ira sua et in furore suo conturbabiteos, ut ostenderet, qui ille irae sermo esset et quae ex eo conturbatio gigneretur, adiecit: ego autem constitutus sum rex ab eo superSion montem sanctum eius, adnuntians praeceptumeius eius. dominus dixit ad me: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te. posce a me, et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae. reges eos in uirga ferrea, tamquam uas figuli confringes eos. iratus loquens atque in indignatione perturbans et irascendi modum temperat et loquendi.
但先知連那在怒中說話、在烈怒中驚嚇之最主要、最重大的宣告也未略過。因為在他所說「那時,祂要在怒中責備他們,在烈怒中驚嚇他們」之後,為要顯明那忿怒之話是甚麼、由此所生的攪擾是甚麼,他便加上說:「我已經立我的君在錫安我的聖山上了,宣告祂的命令。祂曾對我說:你是我的兒子,我今日生你。你求我,我就將列國賜你為基業,將地極賜你為田產。你必用鐵杖打破他們,你必將他們如同窯匠的瓦器摔碎。」祂在忿怒中說話、在烈怒中驚嚇,卻既節制發怒的方式,也節制說話的方式。
But not even the chief and greatest proclamation of speaking in wrath and troubling in indignation did the prophet pass over. For after that which he says: 'Then shall He speak to them in His wrath, and in His fury shall He trouble them,' in order to show what that word of wrath was and what disturbance would be begotten from it, he added: 'But I am set up king by Him upon Sion His holy mount, proclaiming His decree. The Lord said unto me: Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee. Ask of me, and I will give thee the nations for thine inheritance and the ends of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt rule them with a rod of iron, thou shalt break them in pieces like a potter's vessel.' Speaking in anger and troubling in indignation, He tempers both the manner of being angry and of speaking.
1:126
nam neque iram dissimulat potestate praelata, neque a bonitate sua excedit terrore praemisso, ut ad pietatem nos metus eius, cuius potestas esset demonstrata, reuocaret. conturbantur ergo frementes et uana meditantes, cum regem sciunt, cum filium dei audiunt, cum possessorem eum finium terrae et heredem esse gentium discunt, cum regendi ius in uirga ferrea eius esse cognoscunt, cum modo ac facilitate uasis figuli comminuendos populos intellegunt. sic loquitur iratus, sic conturbat indignans, non puniens admissam impietatem, sed impsenitentem ad paenitentiae confessionem commemorato potestatis terrore perturbans.
因為祂既顯明祂的能力,就不隱藏祂的忿怒;又既先施恐嚇,也不離開祂的良善,好叫對那已顯出其能力者的畏懼,把我們召回到虔敬。因此,那些爭鬧、謀算虛妄之事的人便被驚嚇,當他們知道祂是君王,聽見祂是神的兒子,得知祂是地極的擁有者、列國的後嗣,認識到用鐵杖治理之權是祂的,明白萬民要如窯匠瓦器般被輕易地摔碎時。祂如此在怒中說話,如此在烈怒中驚嚇,並非懲罰所犯的不虔,而是藉所提醒之能力的可畏,驚嚇不肯悔改的人歸向悔改的認罪。
For neither does He conceal His wrath, His power being set forth, nor does He depart from His goodness, terror being premised, so that fear of Him whose power had been demonstrated might recall us to piety. Therefore those who rage and meditate vain things are troubled, when they know Him to be king, when they hear Him to be the Son of God, when they learn that He is the possessor of the ends of the earth and heir of the nations, when they recognize that the right of ruling with a rod of iron is His, when they understand that the peoples are to be crushed with the ease and manner of a potter's vessel. Thus He speaks in wrath, thus He troubles in indignation, not punishing the impiety committed, but troubling the impenitent unto the confession of repentance by the remembered terror of His power.
1:127
Quamquam uero per spiritum prophetise, pro gerendis gesta memorantis, quia solitus sit per non ambiguam prouidentiam gerendorum deus futura pro praeteritis significare, absolute intellegi possit, omnia hsec ex persona unigeniti filii dei domini nostri Iesu Christi dicta esse, et infidelitas maxima sit trepidum ad haec sensum ambiguae opinionis adferre, tamen etiam euangelicis atque apostolicis doctrinis ostendendum est. nihil eorum prophetam, quse gerenda praedicandaque essent, non antea prophetasse, maxime cum non exiguus ignorantibus atque simplicibus error oriatur in eo, quod dictum est: ego hodie genui te.
雖然藉著預言之靈——它以已成之事替代將成之事來記述,因神素來憑對將成之事毫無含糊的預知,以已成之事來表明將來之事——可以絕對地理解,這一切都是從神獨生子、我們的主耶穌基督的位格所說;又雖然帶著含糊意見、搖擺不定的心思來對待這些事乃是最大的不信,然而這仍須從福音與使徒的教訓來加以證明。先知未曾不預先預言那些將被成就、將被宣告之事——尤其因為在所說「我今日生你」這話上,無知單純之人便生出不小的錯謬。
But although through the spirit of prophecy, which records deeds done in place of deeds to be done — since God is wont, through an unambiguous foreknowledge of things to be done, to signify things future as though past — it might be understood absolutely that all these things were spoken from the person of the only-begotten Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ, and though it would be the greatest infidelity to bring a mind wavering with ambiguous opinion to these matters, nevertheless it must be shown also from evangelical and apostolic teachings. The prophet has prophesied beforehand nothing of those things that were to be done and proclaimed — especially since no small error arises for the ignorant and simple in that which is said: 'This day have I begotten thee.'
1:128
cum enim ante tempora unigenitus dei filius maneat, non conueniens et consonans esse intellegitur, ut in die genitus sit, cum dies omnes in tempore sint. tempora enim secundum praescriptam nobis a Moyse cognitionem, in hunc suum motum atque cursum ab origine saeculi et constitutione dimensa sunt, cum per momenta et horas et menses et annum reuolubili in se successione discreta sunt; institutumque est tempus ex tempore, quia tempora omnia mutua temporum substitutio et gignit et terminat. atque ob id dies in tempore est, per quam tempus uniuersum et inchoatum desinit et desinens inchoatur. unigenitus uero filius dei, ut dei uerbum, ita est deus uerbum; non cum temporibus est, sed ante tempora;
因為神的獨生子既在萬世之先便存在,就可理解,說祂在某一日被生並不合宜、不協調,因為一切日子都在時間之內。因為時間,按摩西所指示我們的知識,是從世界的起源與其構成,被量度為它這樣的運行與軌道,因它們藉著瞬息、時辰、月份與年,在自身循環的接續中被區分;時間乃出於時間而被設立,因為時間彼此的替換既生出又終止一切時間。因此,日子在時間之內,藉此,全部時間既開始便止息,既止息便開始。但神的獨生子,正如祂是神的道,也就是道成的神;祂不是與時間同在,而是在時間之先;
For since the only-begotten Son of God abides before all times, it is understood not to be fitting and consonant that He should be begotten on a day, since all days are within time. For times, according to the knowledge prescribed to us by Moses, have been measured out into this their motion and course from the origin of the world and its constitution, since they are distinguished by moments and hours and months and the year in a succession revolving upon itself; and time was instituted out of time, because the mutual substitution of times both begets and terminates all times. And on this account a day is within time, through which the whole of time both, having begun, ceases and, ceasing, begins. But the only-begotten Son of God, as He is the Word of God, so He is God the Word; He is not with times, but before times;
1:129
non in aliquo. sed ante omnia est. erat enim, cum tempora facta sunt, quippe qui ea fecerit. erat ergo semper. non enim est definitus in tempore, non subiectus in numerum; sed per quem est eorum omnium, quae et sunt et esse dici possunt, origo, ipse ille infinitse aeternitatis suae ortu, ut ab aeterno genitus, esse persistit. ut igitur dicti prophetici, quo ait: ego hodie genui te, ratio possit intellegi, adhibenda nobis est euangelica atque apostolica auctoritas, ut uel prophetam de apostolo uel apostolum de propheta intellegamus. tenendus autem idem euangelicorum dictorum ordo, qui psalmi est. Nam id primum est: ego autem constitutus sum rex ab eo super Sion montem sanctum eius.
祂不在任何事物之內,而是在萬有之先。因為當時間被造時,祂已存在,因祂造了時間。故此,祂始終存在。因為祂不被界定於時間之內,也不從屬於數目;反倒祂乃是那一切既存在、又可稱為存在之物本源所藉的一位,祂自己藉祂自己無限永恆的出生,作為從永恆所生的,持續存在。故此,為使那先知之言——他說「我今日生你」——的意思得以明白,我們必須引用福音與使徒的權威,好叫我們從使徒明白先知,或從先知明白使徒。並且必須持守與詩篇相同之福音話語的次序。因為這是第一句:「我已經立我的君在錫安我的聖山上了。」
He is not in anything, but before all things. For He was, when times were made, seeing that He made them. He was, therefore, always. For He is not defined within time, nor subject to number; but He through whom is the origin of all those things which both are and can be said to be, He Himself, by the birth of His own infinite eternity, as begotten from eternity, persists in being. Therefore, in order that the meaning of the prophetic saying, in which he says 'This day have I begotten thee,' may be understood, evangelical and apostolic authority must be brought to bear by us, so that we may understand the prophet from the apostle or the apostle from the prophet. And the same order of the evangelical sayings must be held that is in the psalm. For this is first: 'But I am set up king by Him upon Sion His holy mount.'
1:130
et nescio, cui Christum regem esse ambigere sit tutum, latrone hoc ipso in crucis passione confitente: memento mei, domine, cum ueneris in regnum tuum. sed non sufficit confessio latronis, regem esse profitentis. testantur etiam adoraturi magi, cum interrogant: ubi est, qui natus est rex Iudseorum? testatur et Pilatus interrogans: tu es rex Iudaeorum? profitetur et dominus respondens: tu dixisti. non negat interrogatus, nec gloriatur humiliandus ad mortem. cum non sit nisi ex responsione confessio, ita neque se protulit professionis auctorem, neque interroganti cognitionis ueritatem inuidit. Sed non sufficit respondisse, quod rex sit; audiamus etiam illud, et qui sit iste, qui rex est.
我不知道對誰而言,懷疑基督為君王會是安全的,既然那強盜自己在十字架受難時親口承認這事:「主啊,你得國降臨的時候,求你記念我。」但那承認祂為君王之強盜的認信仍不足夠。那將要敬拜祂的博士也作見證,當他們問:「那生下來作猶太人之王的在哪裡?」彼拉多也作見證,問說:「你是猶太人的王麼?」主也在回答中承認:「你說的是。」祂受審問時不否認,將被降卑至死時也不誇口。既然除了回答便沒有認信,祂便既不主動自居為認信的發起者,也不向發問者隱藏真知的實情。但單單回答祂是君王仍不足夠;讓我們也聽聽這作君王的是誰。
And I know not for whom it may be safe to doubt that Christ is king, when the thief himself confesses this very thing in the Passion of the cross: 'Remember me, Lord, when thou comest into thy kingdom.' But the confession of the thief, professing Him to be king, does not suffice. The Magi also, about to adore Him, bear witness, when they ask: 'Where is He that is born king of the Jews?' Pilate too bears witness, asking: 'Art thou the king of the Jews?' And the Lord professes it in answering: 'Thou sayest.' Being questioned, He denies it not, nor, being about to be humbled unto death, does He boast. Since there is no confession except from a response, thus He neither put Himself forward as the author of the profession, nor begrudged the questioner the truth of knowledge. But it does not suffice to have answered that He is king; let us hear also this, and who this is that is king.
1:131
princeps namque sacerdotum etiam cum sacramento interrogat, dicens: adiuro te per deum uiuum, ut dicas nobis si tu es Christus filius dei. et dicit illi Iesus: tu dixisti. interrogatio nunc quoque non inprobatur, sed et iactantia et gloriatio spontanese professionis effugitur; quaesita tamen ueritas non negatur. ac sic uerecundia humilitatis et ueritatis confessio temperantur, ut sit et in responsione officium et in interrogatione cognitio. sed expectandum est, qui tandem sit responsionis huius profectus, quod Christus filius dei est; nempe quid sequitur ad id, quod dictum est: tu dixisti?
因為祭司長甚至用起誓的方式問祂,說:「我指著永生神叫你起誓告訴我們,你是神的兒子基督不是?」耶穌對他說:「你說的是。」在此,發問同樣未被否定,但既避免了誇口,也避免了自發認信的自榮;然而所尋求的真理並未被否認。這樣,謙卑的莊重與真理的認信便得以調和,以致回答中有本分,發問中有真知。但我們須等候,看這回答——即基督是神的兒子——究竟結出甚麼;也就是說,在那所說「你說的是」之後,接著的是甚麼呢?
For the chief of the priests questions Him even with an oath, saying: 'I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God.' And Jesus saith to him: 'Thou sayest.' Here too the questioning is not disapproved, but both boasting and the glorying of a spontaneous profession are avoided; yet the truth sought is not denied. And thus the modesty of humility and the confession of truth are tempered, so that there is both dutifulness in the response and knowledge in the questioning. But we must await what at length is the outcome of this response, that Christ is the Son of God; namely, what follows upon that which was said: 'Thou sayest'?
1:132
uerum dico uobis, a modo uidebitis filium hominis sedentem a dextris uirtutis et uenientem cum nubibus cseli. qui filius hominis est. idem et filius dei est: natura generositatis in filii hominis adsumptione non deperit. nam non idcirco non dei filius, quia et hominis filius est. non enim cum diuinitatis decessione fit humilitatis accessio; nec per consortium infirmitatis contumeliam uirtus excepit, quippe cum infirmitas honore sit donata uirtutis. nam hominis filius a dextris dei adsidet, ueniens cum nubibus caeli contuendus. quo dicto prophetia consummatur illa, quse dixit: dicit dominus domino meo: sede a dextris meis, donec ponam inimicos tuos scamillum pedum tuorum.
我實在告訴你們,從今以後,你們要看見人子坐在大能者的右邊,駕著天上的雲降臨。這位人子同時也是天主之子:他崇高出生的本性,並不因取了人子的形體而消失。他並非因為也是人子,就不再是天主之子。因為卑微的加添,並不伴隨著神性的離去;他的大能也未因與軟弱聯合而蒙受羞辱,反倒那軟弱因大能的尊榮而受了恩賜。因為人子坐在天主的右邊,將被人看見駕著天上的雲降臨。憑這話語,那預言便得應驗,它說:「主對我主說:你坐在我右邊,等我使你的仇敵作你的腳凳。」
Truly I say to you, from this moment you shall see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming with the clouds of heaven. He who is the Son of Man is likewise also the Son of God: the nature of his high birth is not lost in his assumption of the Son of Man. For he is not therefore not the Son of God because he is also the Son of Man. For the addition of lowliness does not come about with any departure of divinity; nor did his power incur reproach through its partnership with weakness, since rather that weakness was endowed with the honour of his power. For the Son of Man sits at the right hand of God, to be beheld coming with the clouds of heaven. By which saying that prophecy is fulfilled which said: The Lord said to my Lord: Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet.
1:133
Hic ergo rex super Sion montem sanctum dei constitutus est, praeceptum domini adnuntians: non super illum utique deperditse ciuitatis montem, conploratse scilicet et homicidae et parricidae Hierusalem; sed Hierusalem eius, quae in caelis est, quae mater est nostra, quae ciuitas regis magni est, cuius, ut existimo, hodie incolse sunt in passione domini resurgentes. dei itaque prseceptum hic rex constitutus adnuntiat, ut uenturum eum cum nubibus caeli meminissent, aduersus quem fremerent et conuenirent, ut per cognitionem diuini aduentus conturbati super contumelia inlusae humilitatis corporeae pseniterent. Tenet autem ordinem prophetise euangelica doctrina.
因此,這位君王被立在熙雍,天主的聖山之上,宣告主的命令:並非立在那已毀滅之城的山上,就是那該受哀悼、殺害同胞、弒親的耶路撒冷;而是立在他自己的耶路撒冷之上,就是那在天上、作我們母親、作大君王之城的耶路撒冷,據我看來,她的居民今日正在主的苦難中復活。因此,這位被立的君王宣告天主的命令,使他們記得他必駕著天上的雲降臨——他們曾向他發怒、聚集攻擊他——好叫他們藉著認識這神聖的降臨而驚惶,為他們曾嘲弄他肉身所受卑微之羞辱而痛悔。而福音的教訓保持了預言的次序。
This King, therefore, has been established over Sion, the holy mountain of God, announcing the commandment of the Lord: not indeed over that mountain of the ruined city, of that Jerusalem to be bewailed, the murderer and slayer of her own kin; but over his own Jerusalem, which is in the heavens, which is our mother, which is the city of the great King, whose inhabitants, as I think, are today rising again in the Passion of the Lord. And so this King, being established, announces the commandment of God, that they might remember that he would come with the clouds of heaven, against whom they raged and gathered together, so that through the recognition of his divine coming, being confounded over the outrage of the humility they had mocked in his body, they might repent. And the evangelical teaching keeps the order of the prophecy.
1:134
nam in eo ipso dicti utriusque ratio continetur, huius scilicet dicti: ego autem constitutus sum rex ab eo super Sion montem sanctum eius, adnuntians prseceptum eius. dominus dixit ad me: filius meus es tu, ego hodiegenui te; cum enim ait: a modo uidebitis filium hominis sedentem a dextris uirtutis, tempus, quo filius hominis, qui et Christus et dei filius est, consessu dei dignus esset, ostendit: ut, quia antea dei filius, tum quoque et hominis filius esset, id, quod tum hominis filius est, ad perfectum dei filium, id est ad resumendam indulgendamque corpori aeternitatis suae gloriam per resurrectionis potentiam gigneretur: quam gloriam a patre corporeus reposcebat.
因為在同一段落中包含著兩句話的緣由,就是這一句:「至於我,已被他立為君王,在他的聖山熙雍之上,宣告他的命令。主對我說:你是我的兒子,我今日生了你。」因為當他說:「從今以後,你們要看見人子坐在大能者的右邊」,他便顯明那時刻,就是那既是基督又是天主之子的人子配與天主同坐之時:好使他既先前為天主之子,那時又為人子,那時他作為人子的身分,能被生入完全的天主之子,就是藉復活的大能,取回並賜予他的身體那屬他自己永恆的榮耀:這榮耀是他成了肉身後向父所要求的。
For in that very passage the reason of both sayings is contained, namely of this saying: But I have been established King by him over Sion his holy mountain, announcing his commandment. The Lord said to me: You are my Son, this day I have begotten you. For when he says: From this moment you shall see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power, he shows the time when the Son of Man, who is both Christ and the Son of God, was to be worthy of sitting together with God: so that, because he was previously the Son of God, and then also was the Son of Man, that which he then is as Son of Man might be begotten unto the perfect Son of God, that is, unto the resuming and granting to his body the glory of his own eternity through the power of the resurrection: which glory, being now in the body, he was demanding back from the Father.
1:135
qui enim in forma dei erat, formam serui acceperat. et acceptae huic formae serui gloriam dei. in qua mansit, expostulat, dicens: pater, clarifica me apud te ipsum ea claritate, quam habui, priusquam mundus esset apud te. non noua quaerit, non aliena desiderat: esse talis, qualis fuerat, postulat et precatur id se, quod ante erat, esse, gigni scilicet ad id, quod suum fuit. non erat autem idipsum tunc totus, quod ut fieret precabatur: fieri autem totus non aliud, quam quod fuerat, postulabat. sed cum fit, quod fuit, et, quod non erat, est futurus, ad id, quod fuerat, id, quod totum non erat, quodam noui ortus nascebatur exordio.
因為那位在天主形體中的,曾取了奴僕的形體。他為這所取、他仍存於其中的奴僕形體,索求天主的榮耀,說:「父啊,願你用你自己的光榮,就是世界未有之先我與你同享的光榮,來榮耀我。」他所求的並非新事,所願的並非外物:他求成為他從前的樣式,並禱告自己成為從前所是的,就是被生入那本屬他自己的。然而他那時並非全然就是他所禱告要成為的那位:但要全然成為的,所求的無非就是他從前所是的。可是當那從前所是的成就,且他將成為那從前所無的時,就那從前所是的而言,那尚未全然存有的,便藉著某種新出生的開端而被生出。
For he who was in the form of God had taken the form of a servant. And for this form of a servant, in which he remained, he demands the glory of God, saying: Father, glorify me with your own self, with that brightness which I had with you before the world was. He seeks nothing new, he desires nothing foreign: he asks to be such as he had been, and prays that he himself may be what he was before, that is, to be begotten unto that which was his own. But he was not then wholly that same thing which he prayed to become: yet to become wholly he was asking for nothing other than what he had been. But when that which was becomes, and he is about to be that which was not, unto that which he had been, that which was not wholly was being born by a certain beginning of a new birth.
1:136
ergo hic resurrectionis suae ad adsumendam gloriam dies est, per quam ad id nascitur, quod ante tempora erat. sed nascens ad id, quod ante tempora fuit, id tamen in tempore nascitur esse, quod non erat. atque ideo filius hominis a modo adsidens uirtutis dextris est uidendus, quia natura carnis post resurrectionem glorificata ad profectum eius, quam antea habuerat, claritatis prouehebatur: cum hominis filius consessurus patri et in inmortalitatem corruptione carnis absorpta in uiuentem tunc et non moriturum amplius dei filium nasceretur.
因此,這是他復活的日子,為要領受那榮耀,藉此榮耀他被生入他在時間之先所是的。然而,他雖被生入他在時間之先所是的,卻仍在時間中被生,成為他從前所無的。因此,人子從今以後將被看見坐在大能者的右邊,因為肉身的本性在復活後得了榮耀,被提升進入從前所有之光輝的增益:那時人子將與父同坐,肉身的朽壞被吞滅入不死,於是他被生入一位永活、不再死亡的天主之子。
Therefore this is the day of his resurrection for taking up the glory through which he is born unto that which he was before time. But being born unto that which he was before time, he is nevertheless born in time to be that which he was not. And for this reason the Son of Man is to be seen from this moment sitting at the right hand of Power, because the nature of the flesh, after the resurrection being glorified, was being advanced unto the enhancement of that brightness which it had had before: when the Son of Man, about to sit together with the Father, and the corruption of the flesh being absorbed into immortality, was then born unto a living Son of God who would die no more.
1:137
Tenuit autem beatus apostolus nouam hanc in eo temporariae huius natiuitatis discretam ab ea, quse ante tempora est, generationem et subdiuisam significationem. nam cum de beata illa et nullis circumscripta temporibus natiuitate dixisset: primogenitus omnis creaturae, quia in ipso creata sunt omnia in cselis et in terra, uisibilia et inuisibilia, primogenitum quoque etiam ex mortuis in resurrectione commemorat dicens postea: primogenitus ex mortuis, ut fieret ipse in omnibus primatum habens. nascitur enim ad id, quod non erat, cum tamen id fieret, quod fuisset. est enim primogenitus ex mortuis, qui erat primogenitus creaturae:
蒙福的使徒也持守了在他裡面這時間性出生的新的被生,這出生有別於那在時間之先的出生,並有其細分的意義。因為當他論到那不受任何時間所限的蒙福出生時,說:「一切受造之物中的首生者,因為天上地上一切,可見的與不可見的,都是在他裡面受造的」,他隨後又提及復活時從死人中的首生者,說:「從死人中的首生者,好使他在凡事上居首位。」因為他被生入他從前所無的,卻同時成為他從前所是的。因為那從死人中的首生者,正是那受造之物中的首生者。
And the blessed Apostle held to this new begetting of this temporal nativity in him, distinct from that which is before time, and its subdivided signification. For when he had said of that blessed nativity, circumscribed by no times: the firstborn of every creature, because in him all things were created in the heavens and on the earth, visible and invisible, he also afterwards commemorates the firstborn from the dead in the resurrection, saying: the firstborn from the dead, that he himself might have the primacy in all things. For he is born unto that which he was not, while nevertheless he becomes that which he had been. For he is the firstborn from the dead who was the firstborn of creation:
1:138
idcirco primogenitus ex mortuis, ut maneret primogenitus creaturae. idem enim est primogenitus ex mortuis, qui erat primogenitus creaturae. Non nunc aliud est, atque antea fuit. quamuis ipse etiam aliud fuerit ex alio; sed id, quod ex alio etiam aliud fuit, in id ipsum tamen, unde antea exstitit, aliud est renatum. nam qui natus ex uirgine homo est, erat et tum dei filius: sed qui filius hominis est, idem erat et dei filius. natus autem rursum ex baptismo et tum dei filius, ut et in idipsum et in aliud nasceretur. scriptum est autem, cum ascendisset ex aqua: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te..
他是從死人中的首生者,正是為此緣故:好使他仍為受造之物的首生者。因為從死人中的首生者,與那受造之物中的首生者是同一位。他如今並非有別於他從前所是的,雖然他自己也曾由另一而成為另一;然而那由另一而成為另一的,卻正是進入他從前由之出現的那同一,重新被生為另一。因為那由童貞女所生的,是人,那時卻也是天主之子:那作為人子的,同時也就是天主之子。他又再由洗禮而生,那時也是天主之子,好使他既被生入同一,又被生入另一。經上記著,當他從水中上來時:「你是我的兒子,我今日生了你。」
He is the firstborn from the dead for this reason, that he might remain the firstborn of creation. For the same is the firstborn from the dead who was the firstborn of creation. He is not now something other than what he was before, although he himself also was something other out of another; but that which out of another also was something other, into that very thing from which it before came to be, is born again as another. For he who was born of the Virgin is man, yet was even then the Son of God: but he who is the Son of Man, the same was also the Son of God. And again he was born of baptism, and then too the Son of God, so that he might be born both into the same thing and into another. And it is written, when he had ascended from the water: You are my Son, this day I have begotten you.
1:139
sed secundum generationem hominis renascentis tum quoque ipse deo renascebatur in filium perfectum, ut hominis filio ita et dei filio in baptismate conparato. Sed id, quod nunc in psalmo est: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te, non ad uirginis partum neque ad lauacri generationem, sed ad primogenitum ex mortuis pertinere apostolica auctoritas est. namque in libro Actuum apostolorum ita dictum est: nosque uobis euangelizamus eam, quae ad patres facta est repromissio. hanc deus expleuit filiis nostris, suscitans dominum nostrum Iesum, sicut et in psalmo primo scriptum est: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te, cum suscitauit eum a mortuis, amplius non regressurum in interitum.
然而按照那重生之人的被生,他那時也重生歸於天主,成為完全的兒子,好使他既成了人子,也照樣在洗禮中被生為天主之子。但如今詩篇中所說的:「你是我的兒子,我今日生了你」,並不指童貞女的生產,也不指洗禮之水的重生,而是指從死人中的首生者,正如使徒的權威所宣告。因為在使徒行傳中如此記著:「我們把福音傳給你們,就是那向列祖所應許的,天主已向我們的兒女成全了,叫我們的主耶穌復活,正如詩篇第一篇所記:『你是我的兒子,我今日生了你』,就是叫他從死人中復活,不再歸於朽壞。」
But according to the begetting of the man being reborn, he too was then being reborn unto God as a perfect Son, so that being made Son of Man he might likewise in baptism be brought forth as Son of God. But that which is now in the psalm: You are my Son, this day I have begotten you, does not pertain to the birth of the Virgin nor to the begetting of the laver, but to the firstborn from the dead, as apostolic authority declares. For in the book of the Acts of the Apostles it is thus said: And we proclaim to you the good news, that the promise which was made to the fathers, this God has fulfilled to our children, in raising up our Lord Jesus, as also in the first psalm it is written: You are my Son, this day I have begotten you, when he raised him from the dead, no more to return to destruction.
1:140
uox ergo hsec dei patris secundum apostolum in die resurrectionis existit; et uideamus an idipsum et euangelistae doceant. namque dominus resurgens tali ad apostolos usus est uoce: data est mihi potestas omnis in caelo et in terra. euntes nunc docete omnes gentes, baptizantes eas in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti. resurgens enim in cselo et in terra ius omne sortitus est. in eo autem quod ait: data est, poposcisse id, quod accepit, ostendit. Sequitur enim: posce a me, et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae. accepit ergo hereditatem gentium, quam poposcit. poposcit enim cum ait: pater, uenit hora, honorifica filium tuum, ut filius honorificet te.
因此,按使徒所說,天父的這聲音是在復活之日發出的;讓我們看看福音的作者是否也教導同樣的事。因為主復活後對使徒說了這樣的話:「天上地上一切的權柄都賜給了我。你們去,教訓萬民,因父及子及聖神之名給他們授洗。」因為他復活後在天上地上得了一切權柄。但他既說「賜給了」,就顯明他曾求取他所領受的。因為接著說:「你向我求,我便將萬民賜你為業,將地極賜你為產。」因此他領受了他所求的萬民之業。因為他求了,正如他說:「父啊,時候到了,願你榮耀你的兒子,好使兒子也榮耀你。」
Therefore this voice of God the Father, according to the Apostle, arises on the day of the resurrection; and let us see whether the evangelists also teach the same thing. For the Lord rising again used such a voice to the apostles: All power is given to me in heaven and on earth. Go now and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. For rising again he obtained all right in heaven and on earth. But in that he says: It is given, he shows that he had asked for that which he received. For there follows: Ask of me, and I will give you the nations for your inheritance and the ends of the earth for your possession. Therefore he received the inheritance of the nations which he had asked for. For he asked when he says: Father, the hour has come, glorify your Son, that the Son may glorify you.
1:141
sicut et dedisti illi potestatem omnis carnis. ut, omne quod dedisti illi, det illi uitam seternam. et rursum: non pro his rogo tantum, sed et pro his, qui credituri sunt per uerbum eorum in me. haec ergo hereditas eius, ut omni carni det uitam aeternam, ut omnes gentes baptizatae atque doctae regenerentur in uitam; non iam secundum diuinam illam Moysi cantionem angelorum dominatui deditae neque secundum eorundem numerum diuisae, sed in dominicam familiam susceptae et in domesticos dei deputatse et ex iniusto atque peccatore et peruerso iure dominantium in regnum seternum diuinumque translatae.
正如你也曾賜他權柄管理凡有血肉的,好使你所賜給他的一切,他都賜以永生。他又說:「我不但為這些人祈求,也為那些因他們的話要信我的人祈求。」因此,這就是他的產業:他要將永生賜給凡有血肉的,好使萬民受洗受教後,都重生得生命;不再照梅瑟那神聖之歌,被交付於天使的統轄,也不再按他們的數目被劃分,而是被接納入主的家中,被算為天主的家人,並從那些轄制者不義、有罪、悖謬的統治中,被遷入那永恆而神聖的國度。
Just as you also have given him power over all flesh, so that everything you have given him, he may give to it eternal life. And again: I pray not for these only, but also for those who through their word are to believe in me. This therefore is his inheritance, that he may give eternal life to all flesh, that all nations, baptized and taught, may be reborn unto life; no longer, according to that divine song of Moses, handed over to the dominion of angels nor divided according to their number, but taken up into the Lord's household and reckoned among the domestics of God, and translated from the unjust and sinful and perverse rule of those who lord it, into the eternal and divine kingdom.
1:142
neque enim adhuc tantum portio domini Israhel, neque funiculum hereditatis eius Iacob, sed gentes omnes, secundum numerum angelorum ante diuisae, nunc iam unius atque unus omnis hsec uniuersitas gentium dei populus est: et aeterna haec omnium ex mortuis resurgentium primogeniti huius ex mortuis aeterni heredis hereditas est. In eo autem, quod subiectum est: et possessionem tuam terminos terrae, non est existimandum, quod id ipsum repetitus sermo significet, tamquam illi sola gentium terras inhabitantium donata possessio sit. non enim ait: et possessionem tuam usque ad terminos terrae, sed terminos terrae. ab eo autem, quod terminatur, id, quod terminat, differt.
因為以色列不再僅僅是主的分,雅各也不再僅僅是他產業的繩索,而是萬民——就是從前按天使的數目所劃分的——如今都已成了獨一天主的子民,這整個萬民的普遍全體都成了一;這就是凡從死人中復活之人的永恆產業,是這位從死人中首生者、永恆繼承者的產業。但在所加添的:「將地極賜你為產」這句中,不可以為這重複的話語指的是同一件事,彷彿單將萬民所住之地的產業賜給了他。因為他並不說:「將你的產業直到地極」,而是說「地極」。那界定之物與被界定之物是有分別的。
For no longer is Israel merely the portion of the Lord, nor Jacob the cord of his inheritance, but all the nations, previously divided according to the number of the angels, are now already the people of the one God and this whole universality of the nations is one; and this is the eternal inheritance of all who rise from the dead, the inheritance of this firstborn from the dead, the eternal heir. But in that which is added: and the ends of the earth for your possession, it is not to be thought that the repeated saying signifies the very same thing, as if to him alone the possession of the lands inhabited by the nations were given. For he does not say: and your possession as far as the ends of the earth, but the ends of the earth. And that which bounds differs from that which is bounded.
1:143
neque id ipsum est finitum atque finire. neque unum est modum sumere atque moderari: quorum aliud interius modum accipit, aliud exterius quodam ambitu suo obiectuque moderatur. non enim ita in profundum demersa terra est aut in latitudinem extensa aut prolata in altum est, ut non undique secus aut circumfusse aut subiacentis sibi naturae contineatur obiectu. hanc enim infernae uastitudinis demersa et inmensa abyssus sustentat, hanc circumfusi et superni aeris spiritus inumbrat atque ambit. quod autem subiecta sibi abysso suspensa sit, propheta testatur dicens: ipse super maria fundauit eam et super flumina prseparauit eam. et rursum: qui firmauit terram super aquas.
被界定之物與界定之物也不相同。取受一個限度與設立限度也並非同一回事:其一從內部領受限度,另一則從外部憑其某種環繞與對峙設立界限。因為地並非如此深陷於淵中,或如此廣延,或如此高聳,以致不從各面被那圍繞它或伏於它下的本性之對峙所包含。因為地獄深廣、下陷而無量的深淵托住它,圍繞在上的空氣之氣息遮蔽並環抱它。至於它懸掛在伏於其下的深淵之上,先知作證說:「他把地建立在海上,安置在江河之上。」他又說:「那將地鋪在水上的。」
Nor is that which is bounded the same as that which bounds. Nor is it one and the same to take up a measure and to set the measure: of which the one inwardly receives a measure, the other outwardly by a certain encompassing and confronting sets bounds. For the earth is not so sunk into the deep, nor extended in breadth, nor thrust up into height, that it is not on every side contained by the confrontation of a nature either poured around it or lying beneath it. For the sunken and immense abyss of the infernal vastness upholds it, and the breath of the surrounding and upper air overshadows and encompasses it. But that it hangs suspended over the abyss subjected to it, the prophet testifies, saying: He himself founded it upon the seas and prepared it upon the rivers. And again: Who established the earth upon the waters.
1:144
et hanc inmensam atque infinitam uastitatem abyssum scriptura solita est nuncupare, cum Iona intra cetum orat et dicit: abyssus multa circumfudit me. atque hsec quidem infinita inmensitas, quae secundum uerbi proprietatem in abysso significari intellegitur, spiritali diuinae substantiae est circumscripta uirtute secundum illud apostoli: quoniam omnia in ipso et per ipsum, ipsi gloria in saecula saeculorum. esse autem infernae huius regionis uastseque abyssus incolas plures, beati Iohannis Apocalypsi docemur, cum nullus, neque in caelo, neque supra terram, neque infra terram obsignatum librum dignus est repertus aperire.
聖經慣於將這無量無限的廣袤稱為「深淵」,正如約納在鯨魚腹中禱告說:「大深淵環繞了我。」而這無限的無量之境——按這字的本義被理解為以「深淵」所表明的——確實被天主本體屬靈的大能所限定,正如使徒所說:「因為萬有都在他裡面,並藉著他,願榮耀歸與他,直到世世代代。」至於這地獄之境與廣袤深淵有眾多居民,我們從蒙福約翰的默示錄中受教,就是當無人——無論在天上、地上,或地底下——被尋見配打開那封了印的書卷之時。
And Scripture is accustomed to name this immense and infinite vastness 'the abyss', as when Jonah prays within the whale and says: A great abyss surrounded me. And indeed this infinite immensity, which according to the proper meaning of the word is understood to be signified by the abyss, is circumscribed by the spiritual power of the divine substance, according to that saying of the Apostle: For all things are in him and through him, to him be glory unto the ages of ages. But that there are many inhabitants of this infernal region and vast abyss, we are taught by the Apocalypse of blessed John, when no one, neither in heaven, nor above the earth, nor beneath the earth, was found worthy to open the sealed book.
1:145
non utique de mortuis et in terram sepultis significare intellegitur, cum ad tertii incolatus demonstrationem non qui intra terram, sed qui infra terram, neque qui mortui sunt, sed qui uiuunt, nullum in se resignandi libri habuerint auctorem. cum ergo possessio terrae finium domino donatur, non tam terra donatur, quam ea, quibus terra finitur. terrae enim terminos, quibus terra ipsa determinatur, accepit. Cuius rei sacramentum omne beatus apostolus Paulus, quippe cuius ore Christus de se est locutus, exposuit dicens: qui cum in forma dei esset.
這並不被理解為指那些死了、埋葬在地裡的人,因為為要表明第三種居所,它所說的不是在地之內的,而是在地之下的;不是已死的,而是活著的,其中無人在自己裡面有開啟那書卷的權柄。因此,當地界的產業賜給主時,與其說是賜給了地,不如說是賜給了那界定地的事物。因為他所領受的是地的界限,就是地本身由之被規定的。這件事的全部奧祕,蒙福的使徒保祿——基督確實藉他的口論到自己——已加以闡明,說:「他本有天主的形體,」
It is not understood to signify those who are dead and buried in the earth, since for the demonstration of a third habitation it speaks not of those who are within the earth, but of those who are beneath the earth, and not of those who are dead, but of those who live, none of whom had within himself any authority for unsealing the book. When therefore the possession of the bounds of the earth is given to the Lord, not so much is the earth given as those things by which the earth is bounded. For he received the bounds of the earth, by which the earth itself is determined. The whole mystery of which thing blessed Paul the Apostle, by whose mouth indeed Christ spoke concerning himself, expounded, saying: Who, being in the form of God,
1:146
non rapinam existimauit se esse aequalem deo, sed se exinaniuit formam serui accipiens, in similitudine hominis constitutus et habitu repertus ut homo: humiliauit se factus obaudiens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis: propter quod et deus illum exaltauit et donauit illi nomen, quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine Iesu omne genu curuet caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur. quia d.ominus Iesus Christus in gloria dei patris. in forma itaque dei manens formam serui accepit, scilicet ex deo homo natus. et post mortem crucis in nomen, quod super omne nomen est, exaltatur:
卻不以與天主同等為強奪的,反倒虛己,取了奴僕的形體,成為人的樣式,並形狀上顯為人:他自甘卑微,順命至死,且死在十字架上:因此天主也高舉他,賜給他那超乎萬名之上的名,好使天上、地上、地底下的一切,一聽見耶穌的名,無不屈膝,並口口宣認主耶穌基督在天主父的榮耀裡。因此,他既存於天主的形體中,又取了奴僕的形體,就是由天主而生為人。且在十字架的死之後,他被高舉進入那超乎萬名之上的名:
did not consider it robbery to be equal to God, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being constituted in the likeness of men and found in habit as a man: he humbled himself, becoming obedient even unto death, and death on a cross: wherefore God also exalted him and gave him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and things on earth and things under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father. And so, remaining in the form of God, he took the form of a servant, that is, born a man out of God. And after the death of the cross he is exalted into the name which is above every name:
1:147
in deum namque, quia nullum ultra deum nomen est, prouehitur, eique hoc petenti, id est, ut esset, quod fuerat ante, donatur. formam enim serui in forma dei manens sumpserat. accepit deinde possessionem finium terrae. id est, ut in nomine Iesu omne genu flectat caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria dei patris: non terra solum, sed superna etiam infernaque donantur et ea, quibus terra concluditur. et in gloria dei patris hodie genitus nascitur, id est in manentem antea dei formam per praemium mortis formae seruilis adsumptio honestatur;
因為他被提升進入天主,既然在天主之上再無別名,而他既求這事——就是使他成為從前所是的——這事便賜給了他。因為他曾存於天主的形體中,又取了奴僕的形體。於是他領受了地界的產業,就是說:好使天上、地上、地底下的一切,一聽見耶穌的名,無不屈膝,並口口宣認主耶穌在天主父的榮耀裡:不但地被賜下,連在上與在下的,以及那圍住地的,也都被賜下。且在天主父的榮耀裡,他今日被生而降生,就是說:那奴僕形體的取用,藉著死的獎賞,被尊入那先前存留的天主形體;
for he is advanced into God, since there is no name beyond God, and to him, asking this—namely, that he might be what he was before—it is granted. For he had taken the form of a servant while remaining in the form of God. He received then the possession of the bounds of the earth, that is, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and things on earth and things under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father: not the earth alone, but also the things above and beneath are given, and those by which the earth is enclosed. And in the glory of God the Father he is this day begotten and born, that is, into the form of God remaining beforehand, through the reward of death the assumption of the servant's form is honoured;
1:148
fitque sub tempore noua nec tamen inusitata natiuitas, cum ad resumendam gloriam dei patris, qui ex forma dei forma serui erat repertus, primogenitus ex mortuis nasceretur. Sequitur deinde: reges eos in uirga ferrea, tamquam uas figuli confringes eos. multis aut male opinantibus aut uirtutem et proprietatem dictorum diuinorum ignorantibus aduersa haec esse bonitati dei uidentur, utgentes, quas filius dei in possessionem poposcit et in hereditatem accepit, terrore uirgse ferreae regat et modo uasis figuli confringat. neque enim boni cuiusquam est dare et accipere perdenda.
於是在時間之下有了一種新的、卻非罕見的出生,就是當那由天主的形體被尋見於奴僕形體中的,被生為從死人中的首生者,為要取回天主父的榮耀。接著說:「你必用鐵杖打破他們,如同打碎陶匠的器皿。」對許多或存惡念、或不知這些神聖言語之力量與本義的人,這些話似乎有違天主的良善,彷彿天主之子求為產業、領為基業的萬民,他竟要用鐵杖的恐嚇來管轄,並如陶匠器皿般打碎。因為將注定要毀滅之物賜下又領受,決非任何良善者所為。
and there comes to be, under time, a new yet not unwonted nativity, when he who out of the form of God had been found in the form of a servant was born the firstborn from the dead, for the resuming of the glory of God the Father. There follows then: You shall rule them with a rod of iron, you shall shatter them like a potter's vessel. To many, either thinking ill or ignorant of the force and proper meaning of the divine words, these things seem contrary to the goodness of God, that the nations, which the Son of God asked for as a possession and received as an inheritance, he should rule with the terror of a rod of iron and shatter after the manner of a potter's vessel. For it belongs to no good person to give and receive things destined to perish.
1:149
et qui mauult peccatorum paenitentiam quam mortem, non existimatur secundum professionem naturae suse esse facturus, si uirga ferrea confringat, quos dari sibi in hereditatem poposcit. Et primum, ne quis temerarise huic et impiae prsesumptioni locus pateat, proprietates ipsae uerborum in romanam linguam translatorum cognoscendae sunt. namque id, quod nobiscum est: reges eos in uirga ferrea, quamquam ipsum regesnon tyrannicum neque iniustum sit, sed ex aequitatis ac moderationis arbitrio regimen rationale demonstret, tamen molliorem adhuc regentis adfectum proprietas graeca significat. quod enim nobiscum est:
那位寧願罪人悔改、不願他們死亡的,按他自己本性的宣示,若用鐵杖打破那些他求為基業之人,就不該被認為將如此行。首先,為免任何機會敞開,讓這輕率而不虔的臆測有可乘之機,必須明白那些譯成羅馬文之字詞的本義。因為我們這裡所讀的:「你必用鐵杖管轄他們」,雖然「管轄」一詞既非暴虐亦非不義,反倒顯明一種按公平與節制之判斷的合理治理,然而希臘文的本詞卻表明治理者一種更為溫和的心意。因為我們這裡所讀的:
And he who prefers the repentance of sinners rather than their death is not to be supposed, according to the profession of his own nature, to be about to act thus, if he should shatter with a rod of iron those whom he asked to be given to him as an inheritance. And first, lest any occasion lie open for this rash and impious presumption, the proper meanings of the very words translated into the Roman tongue must be understood. For that which stands with us: You shall rule them with a rod of iron, although the very word 'rule' is neither tyrannical nor unjust, but demonstrates a rational governance according to the judgement of equity and moderation, yet the Greek proper term signifies a still gentler disposition of the ruler. For that which stands with us:
1:150
reges eos, cum illis est ποιμα v εις αὐ̛̛̛̛τοὐς , id est pastoraliter reges, regendi scilicet eos curam adfectu pastoris habiturus: ipse est enim pastor bonus, cuius nos sumus oues, pro quibus animam suam posuit. ne autem ius tyrannicum significari arbitremur in uirga, quae in uirgae nuncupatione proprietas sit, ex nouo et ueteri Testamento noscendum est. Beatus Paulus ad Corinthios scribens, quos ex multis peccatis ad psenitentiam moderata atque utili adhortatione reuocabat, ait: quid uultis? inuirga ueniam ad uos an in caritate et spiritu mansuetudinis? numquid Paulo ius prsetorium erat, ut uirgam comminaretur et cum officio lictoris ad ecclesiam Christi adesset?
「你必管轄他們」,在他們(希臘文)那裡是「poimaneis autous」,就是「你必如牧者般牧養他們」,就是那要以牧者之情懷擔負治理他們之責的。因為他自己就是好牧人,我們是他的羊,他為我們捨了性命。但為免我們以為「杖」中所表明的是暴虐之權,這「杖」之稱呼的本義,必須從新舊約中學習。蒙福的保祿寫信給格林多人——他正以有節制而有益的勸勉,將他們從許多罪中召回悔改——說:「你們願意怎樣?願我帶著棍杖到你們那裡,還是懷著愛與溫柔之靈?」難道保祿有裁判官之權,可以用棍杖恐嚇,並帶著執棒吏的職務出現在基督的教會前嗎?
'You shall rule them', is with them 'poimaneis autous', that is, 'you shall shepherd them as ruler', namely one who will have the care of ruling them with the affection of a shepherd: for he himself is the good shepherd, whose sheep we are, for whom he laid down his life. But lest we suppose a tyrannical right to be signified in the 'rod', what the proper meaning is in the naming of 'rod' must be learned from the New and the Old Testament. Blessed Paul, writing to the Corinthians, whom by measured and useful exhortation he was recalling from many sins to repentance, says: What do you wish? Shall I come to you with a rod, or in charity and the spirit of meekness? Did Paul have the praetor's right, to threaten with a rod and to be present at the Church of Christ with the office of a lictor?
1:151
non utique ita opinandum est. sed quia omnis dei sermo, quo ex errore in ueritatem retrahimur, quo per comminationem terroremque iudicii ad innocentis et sanctae uitae uiam regimur, uirga est nuncupatus, per quam, intra disciplinam diuini metus cohibiti, moderati ac prouidentis rectoris monitu cohercemur, beatus apostolus condicionem eligendi aduentus sui his, quos monebat, adiecit, utrum mallent eum in seueritate doctrinae atque obiurgationis adesse, an in spiritu lenitatis. quod utrumque secundum modestise tenorem erat necessarium, ut obdientibus lenior, insolentibus uero seuerior adueniret. et hoc quidem ex noui Testamenti auctoritate prsesumptum est.
斷不可如此以為。而是因為天主的每一句話——藉此我們從錯謬被拉回真理,藉著審判的威嚇與恐懼被引入無辜聖潔生命之道——都被稱為「杖」,藉此我們被約束在敬畏天主的管教之內,被那有節制、有先見的治理者之勸誡所節制。蒙福的使徒便向他所勸誡的人,加上了選擇他來訪之方式的條件,就是他們寧願他帶著教訓與責備的嚴厲而來,還是帶著溫柔之靈而來。這兩者按節制之準則都是必要的,好使他對順服的人更溫和,對放肆的人卻更嚴厲。這確實是從新約的權威中所引申的。
It is certainly not to be thought so. But because every word of God, by which we are drawn back from error into truth, by which through the threat and terror of judgement we are guided into the way of an innocent and holy life, is called a 'rod', by which, being restrained within the discipline of divine fear, we are held in check by the admonition of a moderate and provident ruler—the blessed Apostle added the condition of choosing his coming to those whom he was admonishing, whether they would prefer him to be present in the severity of teaching and rebuke, or in the spirit of gentleness. Both of which were necessary according to the tenor of moderation, that he might come gentler to the obedient, but sterner to the insolent. And this indeed is presumed from the authority of the New Testament.
1:152
Hanc autem uerbi doctrinam uirgam nuncupari ex ueteri ita cognitum est, cum dicitur: uirga directionis uirga regni tui; quia haec eadem est uirgae directio, qua per doctrinam in aequam uiam utilemque dirigimur, et quae uirga regni est, necesse est ipsa illa doctrina sit regni. ipsum autem dominum nostrum ob doctrinae sure utilem ac moderatam prsedicationem uirgam nuncupatum ita accepimus dicente Esaia: exiet, inquit, uirga de radice Iesse. ac ne tyrannicam in eo seueritatem per uirgae nuncupationem auderet quisquam opinari, continuo propheticus sermo subiecit:
至於這話語的教訓被稱為「杖」,從舊約中如此得知,就是當經上說:「你國的杖是正直的杖」;因為這杖的正直與那藉教訓引我們入平坦有益之道的正直是同一,而那作為國之杖的,必然就是那國的教訓本身。至於我們的主自己,因他教訓那有益而有節制的宣講,被稱為「杖」,我們如此領受了,正如依撒意亞所說:「必有一根杖從葉瑟的根上生出。」為免有人竟藉「杖」之稱呼,臆想他有暴虐的嚴厲,先知的話語隨即加上:
But that this teaching of the word is called a 'rod' is thus known from the Old Testament, when it is said: The rod of direction is the rod of your kingdom; because this same is the direction of the rod, by which through teaching we are directed into a level and useful way, and that which is the rod of the kingdom must be that very teaching of the kingdom. And that our Lord himself, on account of the useful and moderate preaching of his teaching, is called a 'rod', we have thus received, Isaiah saying: There shall come forth, he says, a rod from the root of Jesse. And lest anyone should dare to suppose a tyrannical severity in him through the naming of the 'rod', the prophetic word immediately added:
← 上一段下一段 →
第 2 章 →
123456789