📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 論神的治理

馬賽的薩爾維安

論神的治理 第 1 章 第 3/13 段

拉丁文原文.37 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 1:78–1:114(全章共 489 節)

第 2 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
1:78
quam beati essemus omnes, si quam promptam erga nos audientiam dei legimus, tam prompte ipsi deum uellemus audire. sed forsitan dicis, hoc quod iustos aspicere deus legitur, parum prodesse causae, quia non sit generalis diuinitatis intuitus, qui iustis tantum speciali benignitate tribuatur. iam quidem superius sacer sermo testatus est, quia oculi domini contemplantur bonos et malos. sed si etiam nunc uis plenius probare, respice quid sequatur; hoc enim subditur: uultus autem domini super facientes mala, ut perdat de terra memoriam eorum. uides absque dubio, quia non potes queri, quod non aspiciat etiam iniustos deus,.
我們眾人若能像所讀到神何等迅速垂聽我們那樣,我們自己也何等迅速地願意聽從神,那我們該多麼有福!但或許你說,經上所讀到神看顧義人這事,對此論題無甚幫助,因為那不是神性普遍的鑒察,乃是藉特殊的慈愛單獨賜給義人的。誠然,聖言上面已見證過,主的眼目鑒察善人惡人。但你若如今仍願得更充分的證明,就當思想下文;因為經上又說:「主的臉向著行惡的人,要從世上除滅對他們的記念。」你無疑看出,你不能抱怨神不看顧不義的人,
How blessed we should all be, if, as promptly as we read that God gives us a hearing, we ourselves were willing so promptly to hear God! But perhaps you say that this, that God is read to look upon the righteous, avails little for the case, because it is not a general regard of the Godhead, but one granted only to the righteous by a special kindness. Now indeed the sacred word has already testified above that the eyes of the Lord behold the good and the evil. But if even now you wish it to be proved more fully, consider what follows; for this is added: 'But the face of the Lord is upon those who do evil, to cut off the memory of them from the earth.' You see without doubt that you cannot complain that God does not look also upon the unjust,
1:79
quia intellegis generalem quidem esse in, omnes domini uisionem sed meritorum fieri disparilitate diuersam. boni quippe aspiciuntur ut conseruentur, mali ut disperdantur: cum quibus utique partem et ipse habens,. qui homines a deo aspici negas, non solum uideri te a domino euidenter intellege, sed periturum quoque indubitanter agnosce. nam cum ad hoc sit uultus domini super facientes mala, ut perdat de terra memoriam eorum, necesse est, ut qui aspicere dei uultum perfide negas, aspicientis iram perditione cognoscas. igitur de praesentia ac de aspectu dei ista sufficiunt.
既然你明白主的鑒察對眾人的確是普遍的,卻因功過的差異而有所不同。因為善人被看顧是要蒙保守,惡人被看顧是要被毀滅;而你這否認人被神看顧的人,自己既與後者有分——就當清楚明白,你不僅被主看見,更當毫無疑問地承認你將要滅亡。因為既然主的臉向著行惡的人是為此目的,就是要從世上除滅對他們的記念,那麼你這奸詐否認自己得見神之面的人,就必藉自己的滅亡認識那觀看者的忿怒。關於神的臨在與鑒察,這些就夠了。
since you understand that the vision of the Lord is indeed general upon all men, but made diverse by the disparity of merits. For the good are looked upon that they may be preserved, the evil that they may be destroyed; and having a share in these latter, you yourself who deny that men are looked upon by God—understand clearly not only that you are seen by the Lord, but also acknowledge beyond doubt that you shall perish. For since the face of the Lord is upon those who do evil for this end, that He may cut off the memory of them from the earth, it is necessary that you who perfidiously deny that you behold the face of God should know the wrath of Him who beholds by your destruction. Concerning, then, the presence and the gaze of God, these things suffice.
1:80
IL Videamus nunc, an qui respicit regat, cum utique ipsa ratio aspiciendi causam in se habeat gubernandi, quia non ad hoc respicit, ut cum aspexerit, neglegat, qui scilicet per id ipsum non neglegere intellegitur, quia respicere dignatur, praesertim cum superius sacer sermo testatus sit malos ad perditionem a deo aspici bonos ad salutem. hoc ipso utique dispensatio diuini gubernaculi demonstratur; hoc est enim iusta gubernatione regere et singulos quosque homines pro meritorum diuersitate tractare. sed accipe tamen de hac re plenius testimonium. dicit ad deum patrem in psalmo spiritus sanctus: qui regis Israhel, intende. Israhel \'uidens deum\' interpretatur:
二。如今讓我們來看,那看顧的是否也治理——既然看顧的道理本身就包含著治理的緣由,因為祂看顧並非為要看了以後就忽略——祂正因這事實而被人理解為不忽略,因祂屈尊看顧;尤其上面聖言已見證,惡人被神看顧是要滅亡,善人是要得救。單憑這事,神之治理的施行就得以顯明;因為以公義的治理來管理,並照功過的差異對待每一個人,這正是治理。但關於此事你且再領受一個更充分的見證。聖靈在詩篇中對父神說:「牧養以色列的啊,求祢留心聽。」「以色列」翻出來就是「見神的人」:
2. Let us now see whether He who regards also rules—since the very reason for regarding contains in itself the cause of governing, because He does not regard for this end, that having beheld He should neglect—He who by that very fact is understood not to neglect, because He deigns to regard; especially since the sacred word above testified that the evil are looked upon by God unto destruction, the good unto salvation. By this very thing, surely, the administration of the divine governance is demonstrated; for this is to rule by a just governance and to treat each individual man according to the diversity of merits. But receive nonetheless a fuller testimony on this matter. The Holy Spirit says to God the Father in the psalm: 'Thou that rulest Israel, give heed.' 'Israel' is interpreted 'seeing God':
1:81
quem utique cum Christiani fide et corde uideant, qui fideliter credunt, licet gubernator omnium deus sit, illis tamen peculiariter regimen praestari a deo dicitur, qui regi peculiariter a diuinitate mereantur. unde et tu quicumque ille es, si Christianus es, necesse est ut te regi a deo credas. si autem gubernari te a deo cum ceteris Christianis omnino non putas, necesse est extra omnes Christianos te esse cognoscas. sed si illud, ut supra iam diximus, magis quaeris, quod ad omnes homines, non quod ad solos pertinet Christianos, ecce euidenter dicit uolumen sacrum cuncta cotidie nutu diuinitatis regi et incessabiliter a deo omnia gubernari;
既然基督徒的確以信德和心靈看見祂,就是那些忠信相信的人——雖然神是萬有的治理者——然而經上說治理是神特別賜給那些配蒙神性特別管理之人的。因此,你這人,無論你是誰,若你是基督徒,你就必須相信自己被神所治理。但你若以為自己與其餘基督徒全然沒有被神治理,你就必須認清自己是在一切基督徒之外。但你若如我們上面所說,寧願尋求那關乎眾人的、而非單關乎基督徒的——看哪,聖卷明明說,萬事天天靠神性的意旨而受治理,萬有不住地被神所治理;
and since Christians indeed see Him with faith and heart, those who faithfully believe—although God is the governor of all—yet governance is said to be granted by God specially to them who deserve to be ruled specially by the Godhead. Whence you too, whoever you are, if you are a Christian, it is necessary that you believe yourself to be ruled by God. But if you think yourself not at all governed by God along with the rest of Christians, it is necessary that you recognize yourself to be outside all Christians. But if, as we have already said above, you rather seek that which pertains to all men, not that which pertains to Christians alone—behold, the sacred volume evidently says that all things are ruled daily by the nod of the Godhead, and that all things are unceasingly governed by God;
1:82
ipse enim, inquit, diligit consilium et disciplinam. nec est enim alius deus, cuius cura est de omnibus. cum sis ergo, inquit, iustus, iuste omnia disponis et cum magna reuerentia disponis nos. ecce habes iugiter disponentem deum iugiter gubernantem: quamuis in isto scripturae loco non gubernatio tantum sacra sed etiam dignitas declaretur humana. in hoc enim quod ait \'disponis nos\' diuinae uis gubernationis, in hoc autem quod cum magna reuerentia\' culmen humanae ostenditur dignitatis. alibi quoque in propheta: numquid non caelum, inquit, et terram ego impleo? cur autem cuncta implet, ipse declarat: quia uobiscum sum, inquit, ut saluos faciam uos.
經上說:「因為祂自己喜愛謀略與訓誨。因為除祂以外再沒有別神眷顧萬有。既然祢是公義的,」經上說,「祢就按公義安排萬事,並以極大的敬重安排我們。」看哪,你有一位不斷安排、不斷治理的神——雖然在聖經那處不僅宣告了聖潔的治理,也宣告了人的尊嚴。因為經上說「祢安排我們」,由此顯出神之治理的能力;而經上說「以極大的敬重」,由此顯出人之尊嚴的巔峰。在別處先知書中也說:祂說:「我豈不充滿天地嗎?」祂為何充滿萬有,祂自己也宣告了:祂說:「因為我與你們同在,要拯救你們。」
'For He Himself,' it says, 'loves counsel and discipline. For there is no other god whose care is over all. Since Thou art therefore just,' it says, 'Thou disposest all things justly, and with great reverence Thou disposest us.' Behold, you have God ever disposing, ever governing—although in that passage of Scripture not only sacred governance but also human dignity is declared. For in this, that it says 'Thou disposest us,' the power of the divine governance is shown; but in this, that 'with great reverence,' the summit of human dignity is displayed. Elsewhere too in the prophet: 'Do I not,' He says, 'fill heaven and earth?' And why He fills all things He Himself declares: 'Because I am with you,' He says, 'to save you.'
1:83
ecce enim non modo regimen suum dominus et impletionem sed etiam uim ac beneficium ipsius adimpletionis ostendit; hunc. enim fructum in se habet diuinitatis impletio, ut saluet ea quae adimplentu. et ideo in apostolorum actibus beatissimus Paulus: in ipso, inquit, et uiuimus et mouemur et sumus. plus absque dubio quam gubernator est uitae, in quo motus ipse uiuentis est. non enim dixit ab ipso nos sed in ipso moueri, docens scilicet insitam intra uirtutes sacras omnium nostrum esse substantiam, quia in ipso profecto uiuimus, a quo hoc ipsum adducimus quod sumus. sed et saluator ipse in euangelio: ecce ego, inquit, uobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque ad consummationem saeculi.
因為看哪,主所顯明的不僅是祂的治理與充滿,也是那充滿本身的能力與恩益;因為神性的充滿本身有這果效,就是拯救祂所充滿之物。所以在使徒行傳中,至有福的保羅說:「我們生活、動作、存留,都在乎祂。」祂無疑不僅是生命的治理者,那活物之動作本身也在乎祂。因為他沒有說我們被祂而動,乃說在祂裡面而動——自然是教導,我們眾人的本體都栽植於那聖潔的權能之內,因為我們的確在祂裡面生活,我們之所以存在,也是從祂而得。而救主自己在福音書中也說:祂說:「看哪,我天天與你們同在,直到世代的終結。」
For behold, the Lord shows not only His governance and His filling, but also the power and benefit of that very filling; for the filling of the Godhead has this fruit in itself, that it saves the things which it fills. And therefore in the Acts of the Apostles the most blessed Paul says: 'In Him we live and move and are.' Without doubt He is more than a governor of life, in whom is the very motion of the living. For he did not say that we are moved by Him, but in Him—teaching, of course, that the substance of us all is implanted within the sacred powers, since in Him assuredly we live, from whom we derive this very thing that we are. But the Savior Himself too in the Gospel: 'Behold, I,' He says, 'am with you all the days, even to the consummation of the age.'
1:84
non solum nobiscum se esse dixit sed etiam omnibus diebus esse nobiscum. tu eum, o ingratissime homo, qui sine cessatione nobiscum est, nec curam nec respectum nostri habere dicis? quid ergo facit nobiscum? numquid ad hoc nobiscum est, ut non respiciat, ut neglegat? et quomodo sibi utrumque conuenit, ut qui pietati praestat praesentiam impietati tribuat incuriam? ecce enim, inquit, uobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque ad consummationem saeculi. praeclare uidelicet affectum dei interpretamur, si nos calumniamur ab eo iugiter neglegi, cum ille nos a se testetur iugiter non relinqui.
祂所說的不僅是祂與我們同在,更是祂天天與我們同在。你這最忘恩負義的人啊,竟說那不住與我們同在的,對我們既無眷顧也無看顧嗎?那麼祂與我們同在究竟為何?難道祂與我們同在是為著不看顧、為著忽略嗎?這兩者在祂身上怎能相合呢,就是那將祂的臨在賜給敬虔的,竟把忽略施予不敬虔?祂說:「看哪,我天天與你們同在,直到世代的終結。」我們若誣蔑祂不住地忽略我們,而祂自己卻見證我們不住地不被祂撇棄,那我們對神慈愛的詮釋實在「高明」得很。
He said not only that He is with us, but even that He is with us all the days. Do you, O most ungrateful man, say that He who is with us without ceasing has neither care nor regard for us? What, then, does He do with us? Is He with us for this end, that He should not regard, that He should neglect? And how do both agree in Him, that He who grants His presence to piety should bestow neglect upon impiety? 'For behold, I,' He says, 'am with you all the days, even to the consummation of the age.' Excellently indeed do we interpret the affection of God, if we slander Him as continually neglecting us, when He Himself testifies that we are continually not forsaken by Him.
1:85
ille per hoc ostendere uoluit, quod a nobis affectu ac protectione iugiter non discederet, quia a nobis etiam praesentia non abesset. nos in contemptum nostri diuinam uertimus caritatem, nos amoris testimonia in odii argumenta mutamus. hoc enim, quod praesentem se esse dicit, odii magis testimonium esse uolumus quam amoris. nam si absentem se dominus futurum esse dixisset, minus causari forsitan de incuria poteramus absentis. maioris contemptus res est atque fastidii, si nos iugiter neglegit qui a nobis iugiter non recedit; et plus in se odii nostri habet, si ad hoc semper nobiscum permanet, ut qui nos praesentia numquam deserit semper repudiet affectu.
祂藉此願意顯明,祂在慈愛與護庇上並不斷離我們而去,因為祂連臨在也不離我們。我們卻把神的愛化作對自己的藐視,把愛的憑據變成恨惡的證據。因為祂說祂臨在這事,我們竟寧願把它當作恨惡的憑據,而非慈愛的憑據。因為主若說過祂將要不在,我們或許還較難以抱怨一位不在者的忽略。但那不斷不離我們的,若不斷忽略我們,這事就更顯藐視與輕慢;若祂總是與我們同在竟是為此目的,就是那從不在臨在上撇棄我們的,卻總在慈愛上棄絕我們,那祂身上就更帶著我們的恨惡了。
By this He willed to show that He does not continually depart from us in affection and protection, because He is not absent from us even in presence. We turn the divine love into contempt of ourselves; we change the testimonies of love into arguments of hatred. For this, that He says He is present, we choose to make rather a testimony of hatred than of love. For if the Lord had said that He would be absent, we might perhaps be less able to complain of the neglect of one absent. It is a matter of greater contempt and disdain, if He continually neglects us who continually does not withdraw from us; and He has in Himself more of our hatred, if He remains with us always for this end, that He who never deserts us in presence should always spurn us in affection.
1:86
sed absit hoc de piissimo ac misericordissimo deo credi, ut ad hoc semper nobis uoluerit adsistere, ut nos maiore fastidio neglegere uideretur adsistens: absit hoc scelus dici. nemo enim, puto, uel in toto humano genere tam malus est, qui ideo cum ullo hominum uelit esse, quia non amet, et ad hoc tantum uti praesentia sua cupiat, ut maiore odii fructu possit despicere praesentem. ipsa nos uel doceat natura humana uel uincat, si non ideo cum quocumque homine esse cupimus, quia eum, cum quo esse cupimus, diligamus. et quia utique diligimus, prodesse ei praesentiam nostram cupimus, quem amamus.
但斷不可如此看待那最慈愛、最慈悲的神——彷彿祂總是願意站在我們身旁竟是為此目的,就是在站立時能以更大的輕蔑忽略我們:斷不可說出這樣的惡言。因為我想,即使在全人類中,也沒有一人惡到這地步,願意與某人同在竟是因為他不愛那人,並且巴望利用自己的臨在只為此目的,就是能以更大的恨惡之果來藐視那在場者。就讓人性本身來教導或說服我們吧:我們與任何人同在,豈非只因為我們愛那與我們同在的人?正因我們的確愛他,我們就巴望自己的臨在能有益於我們所愛的人。
But far be it that this should be believed of the most loving and most merciful God—that He should have willed always to stand by us for this end, that in standing by He might seem to neglect us with greater disdain: far be it that such wickedness should be spoken. For no one, I think, even in the whole human race, is so evil that he would wish to be with any man for the reason that he does not love him, and would desire to use his presence only for this end, that he might despise the one present with a greater fruit of hatred. Let human nature itself either teach or convince us, whether we desire to be with any man for any reason but that we love him with whom we desire to be. And because we surely love him, we desire that our presence should profit him whom we love.
1:87
quod ergo etiam malo homini auferre non possumus, deo tollimus et peiorem pessimis hominibus deum facimus, qui ad hoc futurum nobiscum se esse dixerit, ut fastidiosius nos neglegeret, cum fuisset. sed haec hactenus. III. Superest ut, quia testimoniis sacris et respici et regi a deo omnia iam probauimus, etiam iudicari plurima in hoc saeculo a diuinitate doceamus. Dauid sanctus cum a Nabale Carmelo contumeliae pertulisset iniuriam, quia se ipse ulcisci distulit, ultionem statim deo exsecutore percepit. extincto itaque paulo post aduersario suo et manu caelesti obruto sic locutus est: benedictus dominus, qui iudicauit causam obprobrii mei de manu Nabal.
所以,連我們也不能從惡人身上奪去的,我們竟從神身上奪去,並把神弄得比最壞的人還壞——彷彿祂願意與我們同在竟是為此目的,就是一旦臨在,便能更輕蔑地忽略我們。這事就此打住。三。既然我們已用聖經的見證證明萬事都被神看顧、被神治理,剩下的就是我們也當教導:今世有許多事被神性所審判。聖大衛從迦密的拿八那裡受了辱罵的欺凌時,因他延遲自己報仇,便立即得了以神為執行者的伸冤。不久之後,他的仇敵被天上的手所滅、所傾覆,他就這樣說:「讚美主,祂為我伸了拿八羞辱我的冤。」
What, therefore, we cannot take away even from an evil man, we take away from God, and we make God worse than the worst of men—who is said to have willed to be with us for this end, that He might neglect us more disdainfully once He was present. But enough of this. 3. It remains that, since we have already proved by the sacred testimonies that all things are both regarded and ruled by God, we should also teach that very many things are judged in this world by the Godhead. When holy David had suffered the injury of insult from Nabal of Carmel, because he deferred to avenge himself, he at once received vengeance with God as executor. And so, when a little later his adversary had been destroyed and overwhelmed by the heavenly hand, he thus spoke: 'Blessed be the Lord, who has judged the cause of my reproach at the hand of Nabal.'
1:88
eundem quoque cum fugasset e regno filius persecutor, iudex in breui dominus uindicauit nec uindicauit tantum sed cumulatius uindicauit, quam ipse uoluit qui uindicabatur, ut ostenderet scilicet deus grauiorem sibi esse iniuriam iniusta tolerantium quam tolerantibus suam. nam qui supra uotum eius uindicat, qui uindicatur, quid aliud uult intellegi quam se ipsum in eo, quem sic ulciscitur, uindicari? acto itaque in crucem non manu factam filio parricida, uindictam ei diuinitus attributam sic nuntiatam refert sermo diuinus: bonum adporto nuntium, domine mi rex; iudicauit enim pro te hodie dominus de manu omnium, qui surrexerant contra te. IIII.
當他那逼迫他的兒子照樣把這同一人從國中趕出時,主作審判者在短時間內為他伸冤——不僅伸冤,乃是比那受伸冤者自己所願的更加豐富地伸冤,好叫神顯明:對那忍受不義之事者的欺凌,在祂看來比對忍受者自己的欺凌更為嚴重。因為那超乎受伸冤者所願而伸冤的,豈非要人明白,他自己就在那如此得伸冤之人身上得了伸冤嗎?於是,當那弒父的兒子被高掛在一株非人手所造的樹上時,神的話這樣報告那神所分派給他的伸冤如何被宣告:「我主我王啊,我報好信息;因為今日主為你伸了冤,脫離一切起來攻擊你之人的手。」四。
When his persecuting son had likewise driven the same man from his kingdom, the Lord as judge avenged him in a short time—and not merely avenged, but avenged more abundantly than he himself who was being avenged had wished, that God might show, of course, that an injury to those who endure unjust things is graver to Him than to those enduring it themselves. For he who avenges beyond the vow of him who is avenged, what else does he wish to be understood than that he himself is avenged in the one whom he thus avenges? And so, when the parricide son had been raised upon a cross not made by hand, the divine word thus reports the vengeance divinely allotted to him as being announced: 'I bring good tidings, my lord king; for the Lord has today judged for thee from the hand of all who had risen against thee.' 4.
1:89
Vides, quomodo non rebus tantum, ut supra diximus, et exemplis, sed ipso nomine atque appellatione iudicii deum etiam praesenti saeculo iudicare diuinae per sacros testes? litterae probent. sed forsitan putes, id specialiter sancto uiro a deo praestitum, ut de aduersariis eius protinus iudicaret. dies me deficiet, si de praesentibus in hoc mundo sententiis atque iudiciis uelim dicere. sed tamen, ut euidenter agnoscas, censuram suam et examen sacrum non tam personis praestare quam causis, audi quomodo iudex deus, qui pro Dauid seruo suo sententiam adsidue euidentem dedit, contra Dauid ipsum saepius iudicarit.
你看,不僅如我們上面所說藉行為和例證,神更藉著審判的名稱與稱謂,連在今世也施行審判——就讓聖經藉那些神聖的見證來證明吧。但或許你以為這是神特別賜給那聖人的,叫祂立即審斷他仇敵的事。我若要述說今世在這世上當前的判決與審判,時日必不夠用。然而,為叫你清楚認識到祂的懲戒與聖潔的審察與其說是施予人,不如說是施予案由,你且聽神這位審判者——祂為祂的僕人大衛屢屢賜下顯明的判決——如何更常審判大衛自己。
You see how, not by deeds only, as we said above, and by examples, but by the very name and appellation of judgment, God judges even in the present age—let the divine letters prove it through the sacred witnesses. But perhaps you think that this was granted to the holy man specially by God, that He should forthwith judge concerning his adversaries. The day would fail me if I wished to speak of the present sentences and judgments in this world. Yet, that you may evidently recognize that His censure and sacred examination are given not so much to persons as to causes, hear how God the judge, who assiduously gave an evident sentence for David His servant, more often judged against David himself.
1:90
et quidem hoc non in multorum hominum negotio aut, quod forsitan potuisset deum magis mouere, sanctorum, sed in causa et unius hominis et barbari et ubi tantum uirum persona penitus non grauauerat, nisi causa multasset. interfecto Uria Chettaeo, homine gentis impiae et nationis inimicae, statim fit ad Dauid sermo diuinus: Uriam Chettaeum percussisti gladio et uxorem illius accepisti uxorem et interfecisti eum gladio filiorum Ammon: quam ob rem non recedet gladius de domo tua usque in sempiternum. itaque haec dicit dominus: ecce ego suscitabo super te malum de domo tua et tollam uxores tuas in oculis tuis et dabo proximo tuo. tu enim fecisti abscondite:
而這的確並非在關乎許多人的事上,也非在——或許更能感動神的——關乎聖人的事上,乃是在關乎一個人、且是一個外邦人的案由上,並且那人的身分本絲毫不會拖累這樣一位偉人,若非那案由定了他的罪。當赫人烏利亞被殺——他是不虔之族、敵對之邦的人——神的話立即臨到大衛:「你藉刀擊殺了赫人烏利亞,又娶了他的妻為妻,並借亞捫人的刀殺了他:所以刀劍必永不離開你的家。故此主如此說:看哪,我必從你家中興起禍患攻擊你,並在你眼前把你的妃嬪奪去,賜給你的鄰舍。你在暗中行了這事:
And indeed this not in a matter concerning many men, or—what perhaps might have moved God more—concerning holy men, but in the cause of a single man, and a barbarian, and where the person by no means burdened so great a man, had not the cause condemned him. When Uriah the Hittite had been slain—a man of an impious race and a hostile nation—at once the divine word came to David: 'Thou hast smitten Uriah the Hittite with the sword and hast taken his wife to be thy wife, and hast killed him with the sword of the children of Ammon: wherefore the sword shall not depart from thy house forever. Therefore thus says the Lord: Behold, I will raise up evil against thee out of thine own house, and I will take thy wives before thine eyes and give them to thy neighbor. For thou didst it secretly:
1:91
ego uero faciam uerbum istud in conspectu omnis Israhel et in conspectu solis. quid dicis tu, qui non solum non iudicari quaecumque agimus, sed nec respici omnino a deo credis? uidesne etiam a secreto illo, quo Dauid semel lapsus est, nequaquam dei oculos afuisse? unde et tu, qui, ad solacium arbitror peccatorum tuorum, considerari actus nostros a deo non putas, ex hoc ipso et aspici te a Christo semper intellege et puniendum forsitan propediem esse cognosce, quia etiam Dauid sanctum uides unum errorem suum nec secreto occultorum penetralium potuisse contegere nec a praesentibus poenis priuilegio saltim magnorum operum uindicare. quid enim ait ad eum dominus?
我卻要在以色列眾人面前、在日光之下成就這事。」你這人,不僅相信我們所行的一切不受審判,更相信我們全然不被神看顧——你怎麼說呢?你豈不看見,連大衛曾一度跌倒的那隱秘之事,神的眼目也絲毫沒有離開嗎?因此你這人——我想是為安慰自己的罪——以為我們的行為不被神察看:就從這事明白,你總是被基督看顧,並要知道你或許不久便要受刑罰,既然你看見連聖潔的大衛,也既不能藉隱密角落的隱秘遮蓋他一次的過犯,也不能憑偉大工作的特權從當前的刑罰中救出自己。主對他說了什麼呢?
but I will do this word in the sight of all Israel and in the sight of the sun.' What do you say, you who believe not only that whatever we do is not judged, but that we are not regarded at all by God? Do you not see that not even from that secret in which David once fell were the eyes of God in any way absent? Whence you too, who—for the solace, I suppose, of your sins—think that our acts are not considered by God: from this very thing understand that you are always beheld by Christ, and know that you are perhaps to be punished before long, since you see that even holy David could neither hide his one error by the secrecy of hidden recesses, nor rescue himself from present punishments by the privilege even of great works. For what does the Lord say to him?
1:92
tollam uxores tuas in conspectu tuo, et gladius non recedet a domo tua usque in sempiternum. uides, quam praesens excipiat tantus uir pro uno statim errore iudicium. protinus culpam secuta damnatio est et damnatio statim puniens nihil reseruans, atque ilico coercens reum non in futurum differens reatum. et ideo non dixit: quia fecisti hoc, uenturum iudicium dei senties et futuro gehennae igne torquebere, sed, praesentia, inquit, tormenta senties atque imminentem iam ceruicibus tuis diuinae seueritatis gladium sustinebis. et quid post haec?
「我必在你眼前把你的妃嬪奪去,刀劍也必永不離開你的家。」你看,這樣一位偉人為著一次過犯就立即領受了何等當前的審判。定罪隨過犯而立至,且是即刻刑罰、毫無保留、立時約束那罪人、不將其罪愆延到將來的定罪。所以祂並沒有說:「因你行了這事,你必感受到神將來的審判,並要被地獄將來的火所折磨」,乃說:「你必感受到當前的折磨,並要承受那已然懸在你頸項上、神之嚴厲的刀劍。」此後又如何?
'I will take thy wives before thine eyes, and the sword shall not depart from thy house forever.' You see how present a judgment so great a man receives at once for a single error. Condemnation followed the fault forthwith, and a condemnation punishing at once, reserving nothing, and immediately restraining the guilty man, not deferring his guilt to the future. And therefore He did not say: 'Because thou hast done this, thou shalt feel the coming judgment of God, and thou shalt be tortured by the future fire of Gehenna,' but 'thou shalt feel present torments,' He says, 'and shalt bear the sword of divine severity already impending over thy neck.' And what after this?
1:93
agnoscit scilicet reus culpam, humiliatur compungitur, con- fitetur luget, paenitet deprecatur, gemmas regias abdicat crispantia auro textili indumenta deponit, purpura exuitur diademate exhonoratur, cultu et corpore mutatur, totum regem cum ornatibus suis abicit, profugum paenitentem cum patrocinio ambitiosi squaloris adsumit, ieiunio exigitur ariditate siccatur, fletu effunditur solitudine carceratur. et tamen rex tanti nominis, sanctitate maior quam potestate, praerogatiuis meritorum antecedentium supereminens, cum tanto ambitu supplicet, non euadit. et hic tantum tam grandis paenitentiae fructus est, quod aeternis quidem piaculis non addicitur, sed in praesenti tamen ueniam non meretur.
那有罪的人自然承認自己的過犯——他自卑,他痛悔刺心,他認罪,他哀哭,他悔改,他懇求;他丟棄王的珠寶,他脫下織有波紋金線的衣袍,他被剝去紫袍,他被褫奪冠冕,他在衣著和身體上都改換了;他拋開帶著一切裝飾的整個君王,而披上那帶著刻意襤褸為護的逃亡悔罪者;他因禁食而憔悴,因枯乾而乾涸,因哭泣而傾流,因獨居而如囚。然而這位名聲何等大的君王,聖潔勝於權能,以先前功德的優越而卓然出眾——雖以何等的懇切哀求——卻不得逃脫。而此處這般大悔改的唯一果效,乃是他固然不被判受永遠的贖罪之刑,然而在今生卻仍得不著赦免。
The guilty man, of course, acknowledges his fault—he is humbled, he is stricken with compunction, he confesses, he mourns, he repents, he entreats; he casts away the royal jewels, he lays aside the garments woven with rippling gold, he is stripped of purple, he is dishonored of his diadem, he is changed in dress and in body; he throws off the whole king with his ornaments, and takes up the fugitive penitent with the patronage of ostentatious squalor; he is worn down by fasting, dried up by aridity, poured out in weeping, imprisoned in solitude. And yet the king of so great a name, greater in holiness than in power, preeminent by the prerogatives of his antecedent merits—though he supplicates with so great earnestness—does not escape. And here the only fruit of so great a penitence is that he is not indeed condemned to eternal expiations, but yet in the present does not merit pardon.
1:94
denique quid paenitenti propheta ait? quia blasphemare fecisti inimicos domini, filius qui ex te natus est morietur. praeter poenam acerbae orbitatis etiam hunc addi piissimo patri intellectum summi supplicii deus uoluit, ut dilectissimo filio causa mortis pater ipse existeret qui doleret, cum utique natum ex crimine puerum crimen ipsum occideret, quod creasset. Y. Hoc ergo primum est diuinae animaduersionis exorditlm, primum utique non solum. secuta namque est aerumnarum ingentium longa series atque a domo eius iugis admodum malorum continuatio non recessit. Thamar Amnonis furore corrumpitur, Amnon ab Absalone iugulatur.
末了,先知對那悔罪的人說了什麼呢?「因你使主的仇敵大得褻瀆的機會,你所生的兒子必要死去。」除慘痛喪子之苦的刑罰外,神還願意把這對至高折磨的畏懼加給那最慈愛的父親:就是那將要哀慟的父親自己,竟成了他最愛之子致死的緣由,因為那從罪所生的男孩,正被那創造他的罪本身所殺。五。這就是神懲罰的頭一個起端——的確是頭一個,卻非唯一的一個。因為隨後接連而來的是一長串巨大的災禍,禍患不斷的連續從他家中始終沒有離去。他瑪被暗嫩的狂情所玷污;暗嫩被押沙龍所殺戮。
Finally, what does the prophet say to the penitent? 'Because thou hast made the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme, the son who is born to thee shall die.' Besides the punishment of bitter bereavement, God willed also to add this apprehension of the highest torment to the most loving father: that the father himself, who would grieve, should be the cause of death to his most beloved son, since indeed the crime itself would slay the boy born of crime, whom that crime had created. 5. This, then, is the first beginning of the divine chastisement—first, surely, not the only one. For there followed a long series of immense calamities, and from his house the continual succession of unbroken evils did not withdraw. Tamar is defiled by the frenzy of Amnon; Amnon is butchered by Absalom.
1:95
scelus quidem grande ab uno fratre committitur, sed peius ab alio uindicatur. inter haec Dauid pater facinore utriusque punitur. duo filii peccant, sed tres duorum scelere perduntur ; in Thamar enim uirginitas amittitur, in Amnone etiam Absalonis perditio lugetur. et quidem nescias quem de filiis duobus tam bonus pater grauius amiserit, illum qui manu fratris occisus est in hoc saeculo, an illum qui sua periit in futuro. iam uero hinc iuxta uerbum dei inaestimabilis mali cumulus. insidias diu a filio pater patitur, regno pellitur et, ne occidatur, profugus abscedit.
誠然,一個弟兄犯下大罪,但另一個弟兄卻以更壞的方式報復。在這其間,作父親的大衛因二人的惡行而受刑罰。兩個兒子犯罪,卻有三人因這二人的罪而喪亡;因為在他瑪身上童貞喪失了,在暗嫩身上甚至押沙龍的沉淪也令人哀慟。你的確難以斷定,這樣好的一位父親所更沉痛失去的,是他兩個兒子中的哪一個——是那在今世被弟兄之手所殺的,還是那在來世因自己的罪而喪亡的。如今,按神的話,從此便來了難以估量的禍患堆積。這父親長久忍受兒子的暗算,被趕出國,並且為免被殺,只得逃亡出走。
A great crime, indeed, is committed by one brother, but a worse one is avenged by the other. Amid these things David the father is punished by the wickedness of both. Two sons sin, but three are lost through the crime of two; for in Tamar virginity is lost, in Amnon even the perdition of Absalom is bewailed. And indeed you would not know which of his two sons so good a father lost more grievously—him who was slain by his brother's hand in this world, or him who perished by his own in the world to come. Now indeed from here, according to the word of God, comes a heap of inestimable evil. The father long suffers his son's snares, he is driven from the kingdom, and, lest he be killed, he departs a fugitive.
1:96
impurior nescias an cruentior filius, quia interficere patrem non potest parricidio, foedat incestu et quidem incestu praeter incesti nefas per industriam adcumulandi sceleris elato, cum utique facinus, quod etiam secreta abominabile facerent, persecutor parentis publice perpetrarit, scilicet ut feralissimo crimine non pater tantum absens deformaretur, quam oculi etiam totius orbis publico foedarentur incestu. iam si addenda est et ipsius fugae facies, quale illud fuit, cum tantus rex tanti nominis, cunctis regibus altior mundo maior, omnes admodum suos cum paucissimis seruis fugeret, in comparatione dudum sui egestuosus in comparatione. sui solus, fugiens cum metu cum dedecore cum luctu:
一個污穢得難以言喻、或許更為血腥的兒子;因為既然他不能藉弒親殺害父親,便以亂倫玷污了他,而且是這樣的亂倫——除了亂倫本身的罪惡之外,還因他刻意積累罪孽的用心而變本加厲,因為這樁連在暗中行之都當可憎的罪行,他這父親的迫害者竟公然施行。其用意顯然是:藉這極其可怖的罪行,不僅使缺席的父親蒙羞,更使全世界的眼目都被那公開的亂倫所玷污。如今若還要加上他逃亡的景象,那是何等的情形——當如此偉大、名聲如此顯赫、高過眾王、大過世界的君王,竟只帶著極少數僕人,逃離他所有的臣民;他昔日與自己相比何等富足,如今與自己相比卻淪為赤貧,孤身一人,在恐懼、羞辱與悲痛中奔逃:
A son more impure than one can say, and perhaps more bloodstained; for since he could not slay his father by parricide, he defiled him with incest, and indeed with an incest that, beyond the sinfulness of incest itself, was raised still higher by his deliberate zeal to heap up wickedness, seeing that this outrage, which even in secret would have been abominable, he as persecutor of his father perpetrated in public. The design, forsooth, was that by this most ghastly crime not only might the absent father be dishonoured, but that the eyes of the whole world too might be defiled by that public incest. And now, if we must add the very picture of his flight, what a thing it was, when so great a king, of so great a name, loftier than all kings and greater than the world, fled with only a very few servants from all his own people, once wealthy compared with himself, now beggared compared with himself, alone, fleeing in fear, in disgrace, in grief:
1:97
operto, inquit scriptura, capite et nudis pedibus incedens, superstes prioris status, a se ipso exsulans, paene iam post se uiuens, deiectus usque in . seruorum suorum uel, quod graue est, contumeliam, uel quod grauius, misericordiam, ut uel Siba eum pasceret uel maledicere Semei publice non timeret, ita dei iudicio a se alter effectus, ut ei, quem timuerat forsitan totus orbis, unus in faciem insultaret inimicus. VI. Ubi sunt, qui a deo respici res humanas negant? ecce quotiens testes sacri in persona unius hominis non respexisse tantummodo deum uerum etiam iudicasse docuerunt. et cur haec omnia?
如經上所說,他蒙著頭、赤著腳前行,是自己昔日尊位的倖存者,是離棄自己的流亡者,幾乎已在自己死後仍活著;他被貶抑,甚至淪到承受自己僕人的羞辱(這已是難堪之事),或他們的憐憫(這更為難堪),以致洗巴可以供養他,示每也不怕公然咒罵他。如此,藉神的審判,他變成了與自己不同的人,使那或許連全世界都懼怕的人,如今竟有一個仇敵當面辱罵他。六、那些否認神眷顧人間事務的人在哪裡呢?看哪,神聖的見證多少次教導我們:在一個人的身上,神不僅眷顧,甚至施行審判。這一切又是為了什麼呢?
advancing, as Scripture says, with covered head and bare feet, a survivor of his former estate, an exile from his own self, already almost living after his own death, cast down even to the reproach of his own servants (which is grievous) or their pity (which is more grievous still), so that Ziba might feed him, or Shimei not fear to curse him in public. Thus by God's judgment he was made another than himself, so that against him whom perhaps the whole world had feared, one enemy alone might insult him to his face. VI. Where are they who deny that God regards human affairs? Behold, how often the sacred witnesses have taught that, in the person of a single man, God not only regarded but even judged. And why all this?
1:98
cur utique, nisi ut intellegeremus, eandem futuram semper in mundo censuram et coercitionem domini, quae fuisset? et ideo etiam sanctos homines castigatos quondam iudicio dei legimus, ut iudicandos nos deo iudice etiam praesenti saeculo nosceremus, quia sicut est deus semper sic iustitia dei semper, sicut omnipotentia domini indeficiens sic censura indemutabilis, sicut deus iure perpetuus sic iustitia perseuerans. et ideo omnes admodum sancti in libris sacris inter discriminum imminentium metus et persecutorum gladios constitui praesens iudicium dei postulant. sic enim iustus dicit in psalmo: iudica me, deus, et discerne causam meam de gente non sancta.
究竟為何,若不是要我們明白:主在世上的督責與懲戒,將永遠如同從前一樣?因此我們讀到,連聖人也曾一度受神審判的責罰,好叫我們知道:即使在今世,我們也要以神為審判者而受審判;因為正如神永遠存在,神的公義也永遠存在;正如主的全能永不衰減,祂的督責也永不改變;正如神按其本性永恆長存,祂的公義也持守不變。因此,聖經中所有的聖徒,在逼近的危險的恐懼與迫害者的刀劍之間,都懇求神當下的審判。義人在詩篇中如此說:神啊,求你審判我,在不聖潔的國民中為我分辨是非。
Why indeed, if not that we might understand that the Lord's censure and correction will always be the same in the world as they have been? And therefore we read that even holy men were once chastised by God's judgment, so that we might know we are to be judged by God as our judge even in the present age; for as God is always, so is God's justice always; as the Lord's omnipotence never fails, so His censure is unchangeable; as God is by right eternal, so His justice is enduring. And therefore all the saints in the sacred books, amid the fears of threatening dangers and the swords of persecutors, call for the present judgment of God. For thus the just man says in the Psalm: Judge me, O God, and distinguish my cause from a nation that is not holy.
1:99
quod ne ad futurum dei iudicium trahi posset, subdidit statim: ab homine iniquo et doloso eripe me. praesens utique iudicium dei postulat qui liberari se de manu persecutoris implorat. et bene pro conscientia bonae causae non tam suffragium domini quam iudicium deprecatur, quia bonae causae optimum semper suffragium tribuitur, si cum iustitia iudicetur. alibi quoque euidentissime: iudica, domine, nocentes me, expugna inpugnantes me: adprehende arma et scutum et exsurge in adiutorium mihi. uides etiam hoc loco non futuri examinis seueritatem sed censuram praesentis iudicii postulari. hoc est enim illud quod ait:
他唯恐這話會被引向神將來的審判,便立刻補上一句:求你救我脫離不義詭詐的人。凡懇求脫離迫害者手中的人,所祈求的必是神當下的審判。他既有問心無愧的好案子,便理所當然地祈求主的審判甚於祈求主的恩顧;因為只要按公義審判,最好的恩顧總是賜給好案子。他在別處也極其明白地說:耶和華啊,求你審判那害我的人,攻擊那攻擊我的人;拿著大小的盾牌起來幫助我。你看,這裡所求的也不是將來審判的嚴厲,而是當下審判的督責。這正是他所說的:
And lest this could be dragged over to God's future judgment, he at once added: From the unjust and deceitful man deliver me. Surely he calls for God's present judgment who implores to be freed from the hand of his persecutor. And rightly, in the confidence of a good cause, he prays not so much for the Lord's favour as for His judgment; for the best favour is always granted to a good cause, if it be judged with justice. Elsewhere too most plainly: Judge, O Lord, them that harm me, overthrow them that fight against me; take hold of arms and shield, and rise up to help me. You see that here too it is not the severity of the future examination but the censure of the present judgment that is sought. For this is what he means when he says:
1:100
adprehende scutum et arripe gladium', scutum scilicet ad protectionem gladium ad ultionem: non quia hoc iudicans deus egeat apparatu, sed quia in hoc saeculo haec terribilium rerum nomina terribilium iudiciorum sunt instrumenta, ad humanam intellegentiam humanarum rerum significationibus loquens, quia iudicari ac uindicari se de aduersariis precabatur, per instrumenta terrenae istius ultionis uim diuinae animaduersionis expressit. denique alibi propheta idem, quid inter praesens et futurum iudicium dei esset, ostendit. quid enim de censura praesentis examinis dicit ad dominum? sedes super thronum, qui iudicas aequitatem. quid autem de futuro dei aeternoque iudicio?
拿著盾牌,抓起刀劍——盾牌是為了保護,刀劍是為了報復——這並非因為神作為審判者需要任何軍備,而是因為在今世,這些可怖之物的名稱乃是可怖審判的器具。他以人間事物的意象向人的悟性說話,既然他祈求要在仇敵面前受審判、得申冤,便藉這地上報復的器具,表達了神懲罰的威力。接著,同一位先知在另一處指明了神當下的審判與將來的審判之間的差別。論到當下考察的督責,他向主怎麼說呢?你坐在寶座上,按公義施行審判。而論到神將來永恆的審判,他又怎麼說呢?
Take hold of shield and snatch up the sword—the shield, that is, for protection, the sword for vengeance—not because God as judge has need of any array, but because in this world these names of terrible things are the instruments of terrible judgments. Speaking to human understanding through the significations of human things, since he was praying to be judged and avenged of his adversaries, he expressed the force of divine punishment through the instruments of this earthly vengeance. Then in another place the same prophet showed what the difference is between God's present and future judgment. For what does he say of the censure of the present examination, addressing the Lord? Thou sittest upon the throne, who judgest equity. And what of God's future and eternal judgment?
1:101
iudicabit, inquit, orbem terrae in aequitate et iterum: iudicabit populos cum iustitia. ipsis scilicet uerbis praesentis temporis et futuri tempus iudicii utriusque distinxit. ut enim praesens iudicium ostenderet, \'iudicas\' posuit: ut autem futurum distingueret a praesenti, subiecit postea \'iudicabit\'. haec igitur de cura erga nos dei et gubernaculo et iudicio ratione exemplis testimoniis probasse satis est, maxime quia etiam, quae post hoc secutura sunt, ad id ipsum. omnia pertinebunt. nunc si a deo, cuius negotium agimus, uires ad agendum acceperimus, ea quae contra haec ab aduersariis dici solent, et proferre simul et refutare temptabimus. I. Bene habet:
經上說:他要按公義審判世界;又說:他要按公正審判萬民。他藉現在時與將來時的字眼本身,區分了這兩種審判的時間。為了指明當下的審判,他寫下「你審判」;而為了把將來與當下區分開來,他隨後又加上「他要審判」。既已藉推理、例證與見證,證明了神對我們的眷顧、治理與審判,這就足夠了——尤其因為以下將要陳述的一切,也都與這同一要點相關。如今,若我們從神(我們正在為祂辦事)領受行動的力量,我們就要嘗試把仇敵慣常反對這些論點的說法既陳明出來,又加以駁斥。一、這樣很好:
He shall judge, he says, the world in equity; and again: He shall judge the peoples with justice. By the very words of the present and future tense he distinguished the time of each judgment. For to indicate the present judgment he set down 'thou judgest'; but to distinguish the future from the present, he afterwards added 'he shall judge.' It is enough, then, to have proved these things concerning God's care over us, His governance and His judgment, by reasoning, by examples, and by testimonies—especially since even the things that are to follow hereafter will all pertain to this same point. Now, if from God, whose business we are conducting, we receive strength to act, we shall attempt both to set forth and to refute the things that our adversaries are wont to say against these matters. I. It is well:
1:102
iacta sunt fundamenta operis pia molitione coepti et diuini officii amore suscepti: et ideo non sunt solubili luto posita nec temporali lapide constructa sed sacrarum expensarum confectione ualida et diuini magisterii arte firmata: quae, ut ipse in euangelio deus dicit, nec uentis possint furentibus concuti nec adluuione fluminum subrui nec pluuiarum infusione dissolui. cum enim opus hoc manus quodammodo diuinorum uoluminum instruxerit et caelestium scripturarum compago solidarit, necesse est tam firma haec per dominum Iesum Christum esse quae facta sunt, quam firma illa sunt quae fecerunt.
這件以虔誠的勞力起始、出於對神聖職分的愛而承擔的工程,其根基已經奠定;因此它不是安置在可溶的泥中,也不是用會朽壞的石頭建造的,而是以神聖資材的堅實工藝所建,並由神聖教誨的技藝所鞏固——這根基,正如神自己在福音中所說,既不能被狂風搖動,也不能被江河的氾濫沖垮,更不能被大雨的傾注消融。因為既然神聖典籍之手在某種意義上構築了這件工程,天上經文的結構也使它堅固,那麼藉著主耶穌基督,這些被造成的事物必然如同那些造成它們的堅固事物一樣堅固。
The foundations have been laid of a work begun with pious effort and undertaken out of love for the divine office; and therefore they are not set in soluble mud nor built with perishable stone, but with the strong workmanship of sacred outlay and firmly established by the art of divine teaching—foundations which, as God Himself says in the Gospel, can neither be shaken by raging winds, nor undermined by the flooding of rivers, nor dissolved by the pouring of rains. For since the hand of the divine volumes has, in a manner, framed this work, and the fabric of the heavenly Scriptures has made it solid, it must needs be that these things which have been made are as firm, through the Lord Jesus Christ, as are those firm things which made them.
1:103
aedificium itaque hoc naturam status sui de stirpe sumit et labefactari saluis auctoribus suis non potest. sicut enim in terrenis aedificiis deicere parietes nullus potest, nisi lapides et caementa deiecerit, sic aedificium quod construximus dissoluere nullus ualet, nisi id, unde structum est et consummatum, ante dissoluerit: quod quia labefactari utique nequaquam potest, recte etiam a nobis incolumitas aedificii praesumitur, cuius status subsidiis immortalibus continetur.
因此這座建築物從其根源取得了自身狀態的本質,只要它的建造者不受動搖,它就不能被動搖。因為正如在地上的建築中,除非先拆掉石頭與灰泥,否則沒有人能推倒牆壁;照樣,除非有人先拆毀我們這建築所賴以構築、完成的根基,否則沒有人能拆毀我們所建的這座建築。既然那根基絕不能被動搖,我們也就理所當然地推定:這座根基由永不朽壞的支柱所支撐的建築,是安然穩固的。
This edifice, therefore, takes the nature of its condition from its root, and cannot be shaken so long as its authors remain unshaken. For just as in earthly buildings no one can throw down the walls unless he has thrown down the stones and mortar, so no one is able to dissolve the edifice we have built unless he first dissolves that from which it was constructed and completed. And since that can by no means be shaken, we rightly presume also the safety of the edifice, whose standing is upheld by immortal supports.
1:104
quaeritur itaque, cum haec ita sint, si totum quod in hoc mundo est cura et gubernaculo et iudicio dei agitur, cur melior multo sit barbarorum condicio quam nostra, cur inter nos quoque ipsos sors bonorum durior quam malorum? cur probi iaceant improbi conualescant? cur iniquis uel maxime potestatibus uniuersa succumbant? possim quidem rationabiliter et satis constanter dicere: nescio; secretum enim et consilium diuinitatis ignoro. sufficit mihi ad causae huius probationem dicti caelestis oraculum. deus a se, ut libellis superioribus iam probauimus, omnia dicit aspici omnia regi omnia iudicari. si scire uis quid tenendum sit, habes litteras sacras: perfecta ratio est hoc tenere quod legeris.
因此有人問道:既然這些事如此——若這世上的一切都由神的眷顧、治理與審判所掌管——為何蠻族的境況遠勝於我們?為何即使在我們之中,善人的命運也比惡人更為艱難?為何正直的人被踐踏,而惡人卻興盛?為何尤其是不義的權勢,一切都在其之下屈服?我固然可以合理而相當堅定地說:我不知道;因為我不明白神性的隱祕與旨意。對於證明此事,天上聖言的神諭於我已足夠。神——正如我們在前幾卷中已經證明的——說一切都被祂鑒察、一切都被治理、一切都被審判。你若想知道當持守什麼,你有神聖的經文:持守你所讀到的,這便是完全的道理。
It is asked, therefore, since these things are so—if everything that is in this world is conducted by the care, governance, and judgment of God—why the condition of the barbarians is much better than ours; why even among ourselves the lot of the good is harder than that of the wicked; why the upright lie low while the wicked grow strong; why especially the unjust powers see all things submit to them. I could indeed reasonably and quite firmly say: I do not know; for I am ignorant of the secret and counsel of the Godhead. It suffices me, for the proof of this cause, to have the oracle of the heavenly word. God, as we have already proved in the earlier books, says that all things are watched by Him, all governed, all judged. If you wish to know what is to be held, you have the sacred writings: it is perfect reasoning to hold what you have read.
1:105
qua causa autem deus haec de quibus loquimur ita faciat, nolo a me requiras. homo sum, non intellego secreta dei, inuestigare non audeo et ideo etiam adtemptare formido, quia et hoc ipsum genus quasi sacrilegae temeritatis est, si plus scire cupias quam sinaris. sufficiat tibi quod deus a se agi ac dispensari cuncta testatur: quid me interrogas, quare alter maior sit alter minor, alter miser alter beatus, alter fortis alter infirmus? qua causa quidem haec deus faciat, non intellego, sed ad plenissimam rationem abunde sufficit, quod a deo agi ista demonstro. sicut enim plus est deus quam omnis humana ratio, sic plua. mihi debet esse quam ratio, quod a deo agi cuncta cognosco.
但神為何行我們所談論的這些事,你不要向我求問。我是人;我不明白神的隱祕,我不敢探究,因此我甚至懼怕嘗試,因為這件事本身就是一種褻瀆性的莽撞——想要知道超過你被允許知道的。神既作證說萬事都由祂而行、由祂而分配,這對你就當足夠了。你為何問我:為何這人較大、那人較小;這人悲慘、那人有福;這人強壯、那人軟弱?神以何緣故行這些事,我不明白;但作為最充分的理由,我能指明這些事是由神而行的,這已綽綽有餘。因為正如神超乎一切人的理性,照樣,我既知道萬事都由神而行,這對我就當比理性更為重要。
But by what cause God does these things of which we speak, do not require of me. I am a man; I do not understand the secrets of God, I dare not investigate them, and therefore I even dread to attempt it, because this very thing is a kind of sacrilegious rashness—to desire to know more than you are permitted. Let it suffice you that God attests that all things are done and dispensed by Him. Why do you ask me why one is greater, another lesser; one wretched, another blessed; one strong, another weak? By what cause God does these things, I do not understand; but for the fullest reason it abundantly suffices that I show these things are done by God. For as God is more than all human reason, so it ought to be more to me than reason that I know all things are done by God.
1:106
nihil ergo in hac re opus est nouum aliquid audire: satis sit pro uniuersis rationibus auctor deus. nec licet, ut de his quae diuino aguntur arbitrio aliud dicas iustum aliud iniustum, quia quicquid a deo agi uides atque conuinceris, necesse est plus quam iustum esse fatearis. haec ergo de gubernaculo dei atque iudicio expeditissime ac certissime dici possunt. neque enim necesse est, ut argumentis a me probetur, quod hoc ipso, quia a deo dicitur, comprobatur. itaque, cum legimus dictum a deo, quia aspiciat iugiter omnem terram, hoc ipso probamus quod aspicit, quia aspicere se dicit: . cum. legimus quod regat cuncta quae fecit, hoc ipso adprobamus quod regit, quia se regere testatur:
因此在這件事上,不需要聽任何新的說法:讓神作為權威滿足一切的理由。論到那些由神旨意而行的事,也不容許稱這事為義、那事為不義;因為凡你所看見、並確信是由神而行的事,你都必須承認為超乎公義。這樣,關於神的治理與審判,這些話便能極其現成而確鑿地說出來。凡由這一事實本身——即由神所說——所證明的,實在無需以我的論證去證明。因此,當我們讀到神說祂持續鑒察全地,我們就藉這事本身證明祂鑒察,因為祂說祂鑒察;當我們讀到祂治理祂所造的一切,我們就藉這事本身認可祂治理,因為祂作證說祂治理:
In this matter, therefore, there is no need to hear anything new: let God as authority suffice for all reasons. Nor is it permitted, concerning those things done by the divine will, to call one thing just and another unjust; for whatever you see and are convinced is done by God, you must needs confess to be more than just. These things, then, concerning God's governance and judgment can be said most readily and most surely. Nor indeed is it necessary that it be proved by my arguments what is proved by this very fact—that it is said by God. And so, when we read it said by God that He continually beholds the whole earth, by this very thing we prove that He beholds, because He says He beholds; when we read that He governs all things He has made, by this very thing we approve that He governs, because He testifies that He governs:
1:107
cum legimus quod praesenti iudicio uniuersa dispenset, hoc ipso euidens est quod iudicat, quia se iudicare confirmat. alia enim omnia, id est humana dicta, argumentis ac testibus egent: dei autem sermo ipse sibi testis est, quia necesse est, quicquid incorrupta ueritas loquitur, incorruptum sit testimonium ueritatis. sed tamen cum per scripturas sacras scire nos quasi de arcano animi ac mentis suae quaedam uoluerit deus noster, quia ipsum quodammodo scripturae sacrae oraculum dei mens est, quicquid uel agnosci per suos uel praedicari deus uoluit non tacebo. unum quamuis prius quam loqui ordiar scire cupiam, cum Christianis mihi loquendum an cum paganis sit.
當我們讀到祂藉當下的審判分配萬事,我們就藉這事本身明白祂施行審判,因為祂肯定說祂審判。因為其他一切事物——即人所說的話——都需要論證與見證;但神的話卻是自身的見證,因為凡不朽壞的真理所說的,必然是真理不朽壞的見證。然而,既然我們的神願意藉神聖的經文,彷彿從祂心思與心意的隱祕之處,讓我們知道某些事——因為神聖經文的神諭在某種意義上就是神的心意本身——那麼凡神願意藉祂自己的話被人認識、或被人宣揚的,我就不會緘默。但在我開口之前,我想先知道一件事:我是當對基督徒說話,還是當對外邦人說話。
When we read that He dispenses all things by present judgment, by this very thing it is evident that He judges, because He affirms that He judges. For all other things—that is, human sayings—need arguments and witnesses; but God's word is a witness to itself, because it must needs be that whatever incorrupt Truth speaks is the incorrupt testimony of Truth. Yet nevertheless, since our God has willed us to know certain things through the sacred Scriptures, as it were from the secret of His mind and heart—because the oracle of sacred Scripture is in a manner the very mind of God—I will not be silent about whatever God has willed to be known through His own or to be proclaimed. Yet before I begin to speak, I would wish to know one thing: whether I must speak with Christians or with pagans.
1:108
si enim cum Christianis, probaturum me quod ago esse non dubito; si autem cum paganis, probare contemnam, non quia probatione deficiar, sed quia profuturum quod loquor esse despero; infructuosus quippe est et inanis labor, ubi non recipit probationem prauus auditor. sed tamen quia esse nullum omnino arbitror Christiani nominis hominem, qui non se Christianum uideri uelit, ego cum Christiano agam. quamuis enim quia impiae ac paganicae infidelitatis sit, mihi tamen satis est Christiano probari quod dico. II. Causaris igitur, quid sit istud, quod Christiani, qui deum credimus, miseriores omnibus sumus. sufficere quidem mihi ad respondendum hoc loco poterat, quod apostolus ad ecclesias dixit:
因為若是對基督徒,我毫不懷疑我能證明我所做的事;但若是對外邦人,我便不屑證明——不是因為我缺乏證據,而是因為我對我所說的話能否有益感到絕望;因為在敗壞的聽者不接受證據之處,這勞力實在是徒然虛空的。然而,既然我認為凡稱為基督徒的人,絕沒有一個不願被人看作基督徒,我就要對基督徒說話。因為儘管這種質疑屬於不虔敬、外邦式的不信,但只要我所說的能向基督徒證明,於我便已足夠。二、於是你提出這樣的疑問:我們這些信神的基督徒,為何比眾人更為悲慘?在此處作答,使徒對眾教會所說的話,本可使我滿足:
For if with Christians, I do not doubt that I shall prove what I am doing; but if with pagans, I shall disdain to prove it—not because I am wanting in proof, but because I despair that what I say will be of profit; for the labour is indeed fruitless and vain where a depraved hearer does not accept the proof. Yet nevertheless, since I think there is absolutely no man of the Christian name who does not wish to be seen as a Christian, I will deal with the Christian. For although it belongs to an impious and paganish faithlessness, it is enough for me that what I say be proved to the Christian. II. You allege, then, this question: how is it that we Christians, who believe in God, are more wretched than all men? Indeed, for answering in this place, it might have sufficed me what the Apostle said to the churches:
1:109
nemo moueatur in tribulationibus; ipsi enim scitis quoniam in hoc positi sumus. et ideo cum in hoc positos nos esse a deo apostolus dicat, ut aerumnas ut miserias ut tristitias perferamus, quid mirum est, si mala cuncta perferimus, qui ad toleranda aduersa omnia militamus ? sed quia multi ista non sapiunt et putant homines Christianos haec quasi stipendia fidei suae a deo capere debere, ut, quia sint cunctis gentibus religiosiores, sint cunctis etiam fortiores, adquiescamus opinioni eorum atque sententiae. sed uideamus tamen quid sit deum fideliter credi.
在患難中不要有人被動搖;因為你們自己知道,我們是為此而被設立的。因此,既然使徒說我們是被神設立為此——為要忍受艱難、痛苦與憂傷——那麼我們既受召去承擔一切逆境,忍受一切禍患又有何奇怪?但既然許多人不明白這些事,反倒以為基督徒理當從神那裡領受這些,彷彿是他們信心的酬勞——認為他們既比萬民更虔誠,也就當比萬民更強盛——那麼就讓我們姑且順從他們的看法與意見。然而,讓我們仍要看看:忠實地信神究竟是什麼。
Let no one be moved in tribulations; for you yourselves know that we are appointed to this. And therefore, since the Apostle says that we are appointed to this by God—to endure hardships, miseries, and sorrows—what wonder is it if we endure all evils, we who are enlisted to bear all adversities? But since many do not understand these things and think that Christian men ought to receive these as it were the wages of their faith from God—that because they are more religious than all nations, they should also be stronger than all—let us yield to their opinion and view. Yet let us nevertheless see what it is to believe in God faithfully.
1:110
qui enim tam magnam credulitatis et fidei mercedem in hoc saeculo esse uolumus, qualis credulitas aut fides ipsa esse debeat considerare debemus. quid est igitur credulitas uel fides ? opinor, fideliter hominem Christo credere, id est fidelem deo esse, hoc est fideliter dei mandata seruare. sicut enim serui hominum diuitum aut procuratores, quibus uel supellectiles copiosae uel cellaria opulenta creduntur, fideles absque dubio dici non queunt, si res sibi traditas deuorarint: sic profecto etiam Christiani homines infideles sunt, si bona sibi a deo adsignata corruperint. quaeritur forsitan, quae sint bona, quae deus Christianis hominibus adsignet?
因為我們既願信仰與信德在今世有如此大的酬報,就當思想那信仰或信德本身應當是怎樣的。那麼,何為信仰或信德呢?依我看來,就是人忠實地信基督,也就是對神忠信,也就是忠實地遵守神的誡命。因為正如富人的僕人或管家,那些被託付豐盛器物或殷實庫房的人,若吞沒了交託給他們的東西,就無疑不能被稱為忠信;照樣,基督徒若敗壞了神所分派給他們的美物,也必然是不忠信的。或許有人問:神分派給基督徒的美物是什麼?
For we who wish the reward of belief and faith to be so great in this age ought to consider what that belief or faith itself ought to be. What, then, is belief or faith? In my opinion, it is for a man to believe faithfully in Christ, that is, to be faithful to God, that is, faithfully to keep God's commandments. For just as the servants or stewards of rich men, to whom are entrusted abundant furnishings or opulent storerooms, cannot without doubt be called faithful if they devour the things handed over to them, so assuredly Christian men too are unfaithful if they corrupt the goods assigned to them by God. It is asked, perhaps, what are the goods that God assigns to Christian men?
1:111
quae, nisi omnia per quae credimus, id est, per quae omnia Christiani sumus? primum scilicet legem, deinde prophetas, tertio euangelium, quarto apostolicas lectiones, postremum regenerationis nouae munus, sancti baptismatis gratiam, diuini chrismatis unctionem: scilicet, ut sicut apud Hebraeos quondam, id est peculiarem ac propriam dei gentem, cum iudiciarius honor in potestatem regiam transcendisset, probatissimos et lectissimos uiros per unguentum regium deus uocauit in regnum, sic omnes homines Christiani, cum post chrisma ecclesiasticum omnia dei mandata fecissent, ad capiendum laboris praemium uocarentur ad caelum.
若不是我們藉以相信的一切——就是我們眾人藉以成為基督徒的一切——又是什麼呢?首先是律法,其次是先知,第三是福音,第四是使徒書信,最後是新生的恩賜、聖洗的恩典、神聖膏油的傅抹。以致正如從前在希伯來人中——就是神特選、專屬的子民——當審判的尊榮轉入君王的權柄時,神藉君王的膏油召那最蒙嘉許、最為精選的人進入王國;照樣,所有基督徒在受了教會的膏油之後,若遵行了神一切的誡命,就要蒙召上天,領受勞苦的賞賜。
What, if not all the things through which we believe—that is, through which we are all Christians? First, namely, the Law; then the Prophets; thirdly the Gospel; fourthly the apostolic readings; lastly the gift of the new regeneration, the grace of holy baptism, the anointing of the divine chrism. So that, just as once among the Hebrews—that is, God's peculiar and proper nation—when the judicial honour had passed over into royal power, God called the most approved and most chosen men into the kingdom through the royal anointing, so all Christian men, when after the ecclesiastical chrism they should have done all God's commandments, might be called to heaven to receive the reward of their labour.
1:112
cum ergo ista sint omnia, per quae fides constat, uideamus quis tanta haec fidei sacramenta custodiat, ut fidelis esse uideatur, quia infidelis, ut diximus, sit necesse est qui fidei commissa non seruat. et quidem non quaero, ut cuncta faciat quae testamenta duorum temporum iubent: remitto censuram legis antiquae, remitto has prophetarum minas, remitto etiam quae remitti omnino non possunt, uel apostolicorum librorum, seuerissimam institutionem uel euangelicorum uoluminum plenam omni perfectionis genere doctrinam: paucissimis saltim praeceptis dei quis obsequatur interrogo. neo dico illa quae ita multi refugiunt, ut paene et execrentur.
既然這一切都是信仰藉以堅立的事物,就讓我們看看誰持守信仰這些如此偉大的聖事,以致被視為忠信;因為正如我們所說,凡不持守所託付於信仰之事的人,必然是不忠信的。我實在不要求他遵行兩個時代的約書所吩咐的一切。我豁免古律法的督責,我豁免先知的這些威嚇,我甚至豁免那些完全不能被豁免的——無論是使徒書卷極其嚴厲的訓誨,還是福音典籍充滿各樣完全的教義。我只問:誰遵守神最少數的訓誡?我甚至還不提那些許多人如此避之唯恐不及、幾乎憎惡的事。
Since, then, all these are the things through which faith stands firm, let us see who keeps these so great sacraments of faith, so as to be seen as faithful; for whoever does not keep what is committed to faith must needs be unfaithful, as we have said. And indeed I do not require that he do all the things which the testaments of the two ages command. I remit the censure of the ancient Law, I remit these threats of the Prophets, I remit even the things that cannot at all be remitted—whether the most severe instruction of the apostolic books or the doctrine of the evangelic volumes, full of every kind of perfection. I ask merely who obeys the very fewest of God's precepts. Nor do I speak of those things which so many shun that they almost abhor them.
1:113
tantum apud nos honor et reuerentia dei proficit , ut quae indeuotione non facimus, etiam odio digna esse ducamus. denique hoc, quod saluator cogitare nos de crastino prohibet, quis audire dignatur? quod contentos singulis tunicis iubet esse, quis recipit? quod ambulare excalcios praecipit, quis non modo faciendum sed uel ferendum arbitretur? itaque ego ista praetereo. in hoc enim fides, per quam confidimus, recidit, ut quae dominus nobis salutaria esse uoluit nos superflua iudicemus. diligite, inquit saluator, inimicos uestros, benefacite his qui oderunt uos, et orate pro persequentibus et calumniantibus uos. quis haec omnia faciat?
在我們中間,對神的尊崇與敬畏竟到如此地步:那些我們因缺乏虔誠而不去行的事,我們甚至認為當受憎恨。簡言之——救主禁止我們為明天憂慮,有誰肯聽從呢?祂命令我們只以一件內衣為足,有誰接受呢?祂吩咐我們赤腳而行,有誰不僅認為當去行、甚至認為當忍受呢?於是我把這些事略過不提。因為我們藉以信靠的信心已墮落到這地步:主所願定為對我們有益的事,我們卻判定為多餘。救主說:要愛你們的仇敵,善待恨你們的人,並為逼迫你們、毀謗你們的人禱告。有誰行這一切呢?
So far do honour and reverence for God avail among us, that the things we do not do out of undevotion, we even reckon to be worthy of hatred. In short, this—that the Saviour forbids us to be anxious about the morrow—who deigns to hear it? That He commands us to be content with single tunics, who accepts it? That He bids us walk unshod, who would think it ought not merely to be done, but even to be endured? And so I pass these things by. For to this has the faith by which we trust fallen away, that we judge superfluous the things which the Lord willed to be salutary for us. Love, says the Saviour, your enemies, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who persecute and slander you. Who does all these things?
1:114
quis pro inimicis suis ista quae deus iussit, non dico uotis sed uerbis saltim agere dignetur? quae etiam, si quis se cogit ut faciat, facit tamen ore non mente: praestat quidem uocis officium sed animi non mutat affectum. ac per hoc etiamsi pro aduersario suo orare se cogit, loquitur non precatur. longum est de singulis dicere. sed adhuc aliquid tamen addam, ut intellegamus nos non modo non omnibus dei obtemperare uerbis, sed nullis paene illius oboedire mandatis. et ideo apostolus clamat: nam qui se existimat esse aliquid, cum nihil sit, se ipsum seducit.
有誰肯為他的仇敵行神所吩咐的這些事——我不說用心願,至少用言語呢?而這些事,即使有人勉強自己去行,也是用口而非用心:他固然盡了口舌的職分,卻沒有改變心靈的情感。因此,即使他勉強自己為對頭禱告,他也只是說說,並非真在祈求。逐一細說太過冗長。但我仍要再加一點,好叫我們明白:我們不僅未遵行神一切的話,甚至幾乎不遵守祂任何的命令。因此使徒呼喊說:人若無有,自己還以為有,就是自欺了。
Who deigns to do for his enemies these things which God commanded—I do not say with vows, but at least in words? And even these, if someone forces himself to do them, he does nevertheless with the mouth, not the mind: he renders indeed the service of the voice, but does not change the affection of his soul. And through this, even if he forces himself to pray for his adversary, he speaks but does not pray. It is long to speak of individual things. But I will still add something further, that we may understand that we not only fail to obey all God's words, but obey almost none of His commands. And therefore the Apostle cries out: For if anyone thinks himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceives himself.
← 上一段下一段 →
第 2 章 →
1234