← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 文集
塔普蘇斯的維吉里烏斯
文集 第 6 章 第 2/5 段
拉丁文原文．37 節．部分字詞可點開查義．本章太長已分段，此段為 6:36–6:72（全章共 165 節）
6:36
< Abrahæ cum repromisisset Deus quo niam nullum alium habebat majorem, per quem jura ret, juravit per semetipsum (Hebr. VI, 13).) Vides igi- tur Scripturam, quia nullum alium majorem habet per quem juraret. Filius autem est, de quo dicilur quoniam ipse visus est Ahrahae. Unde et ait : « Abra ham diem meum vidit, et gavisus eat (Joan. VIII, 56. » Palladius dixit: < Pater major eat. » Eusebius episcopus dixit: Quando ut Deus locutus, majorem non habuit; quando ut homo locutus, ma jorem habuit. Palladius dixit : Pater genuit Filium, 497 Pater misit Filium. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Anathema illi qui nc gat Filium secundum divinitatem æqualem Patri. Omnes episcopi dixerunt : Anathema.
『神向亞伯拉罕應許的時候，因為沒有比自己更大可以指著起誓的，就指著自己起誓』（來六13）。可見你從聖經看出，祂沒有別的更大者可以指著起誓。而那位被說是親自向亞伯拉罕顯現的，乃是聖子。所以祂也說：『亞伯拉罕看見我的日子，就快樂』（約八56）。帕拉迪烏說：『聖父更大。』優西比烏主教說：當祂以神的身分說話時，祂沒有更大者；當祂以人的身分說話時，祂就有更大者。帕拉迪烏說：聖父生了聖子，聖父差了聖子。安波羅修主教說：凡否認聖子按其神性與聖父同等的，當受咒詛。眾主教都說：當受咒詛。
'When God made promise to Abraham, since He had no other greater by whom to swear, He swore by Himself' (Heb. 6:13). You see therefore the Scripture, that He has no other greater by whom to swear. But it is the Son of whom it is said that He Himself was seen by Abraham. Whence also He says, 'Abraham saw my day, and rejoiced' (John 8:56). Palladius said: 'The Father is greater.' Bishop Eusebius said: When He spoke as God, He had none greater; when He spoke as man, He had one greater. Palladius said: The Father begot the Son, the Father sent the Son. Bishop Ambrose said: Anathema upon him who denies that the Son is equal to the Father according to His divinity. All the bishops said: Anathema.
6:37
Palladius dixit: Filius subjectus Patri, Filius prae cepta Patris custodit. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Subjectus secundum carnis rationem. Cæterum et ipse meministi quia legisti, « Nemo venit ad me, nisi quem Pater attraxe rit (Joan. VI, 44). » Sabinus episcopus dixit: Dicat si secundum divi nitatem subjectus est Patri, an secundum incarna tionem. Palladius dixit : Ergo Pater maior est. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Et alibi scriptum est: « Fidelia Deus : per quem vocati estis in communionem Filii ejus (I Cor. i, 9).» Ego dico Patrem majorem esse secundum carnis assumptionem, quam suscepit Filius Dei, non secundum divinitatem. Palladius dixit : Quæ enim comparatio est Filii Dei?
帕拉迪烏說：聖子順服聖父，聖子遵守聖父的命令。安波羅修主教說：祂是按肉體的緣故而順服。再者，你自己記得你讀過：『若不是差我來的父吸引人，就沒有能到我這裡來的』（約六44）。撒比努斯主教說：讓他說明，祂是按神性順服聖父，還是按道成肉身。帕拉迪烏說：那麼聖父更大。安波羅修主教說：在別處也記著：『神是信實的，你們原是被祂所召，好與祂兒子一同得分』（林前一9）。我說聖父之所以更大，乃是按神的兒子所取的肉體而言，並非按神性。帕拉迪烏說：神的兒子有甚麼可比之物呢？
Palladius said: The Son is subject to the Father; the Son keeps the commandments of the Father. Bishop Ambrose said: Subject according to the principle of the flesh. Moreover, you yourself remember that you have read, 'No one comes to me unless the Father draw him' (John 6:44). Bishop Sabinus said: Let him say whether He is subject to the Father according to His divinity, or according to His incarnation. Palladius said: Then the Father is greater. Bishop Ambrose said: And elsewhere it is written: 'God is faithful: by whom you were called into the fellowship of His Son' (1 Cor. 1:9). I say that the Father is greater according to the assumption of the flesh which the Son of God took on, not according to His divinity. Palladius said: For what comparison is there with the Son of God?
6:38
Et caro potest dicere, Deus me major est. Caro loquebatur, aut divinitas, quia ibi erat caro? Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Caro sine anima non loquitur. Eusebius episcopus dixit: Deus in carne loqueba tur secundum carnem, quando dicebat : c Quid me persequimini hominem (Joan. VIII, 40)? » Quis hoc dixit? Palladius dixit: Filius Dei. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Deus ergo Filius Dei est secundum divini tatem, et homo est secundum carnem. Palladius dixit: Carnem suscepit. Eusebius episcopus dixit : Ergo humanis verbis usus est? Palladius dixit: Carnem humanam suscepit. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Dicat quia non secun dum divinitatem Apostolus dixit subjectum, sed se cundum carnem.
連肉體也能說：『神比我大。』說話的是肉體呢，還是神性，既然那裡有肉體？安波羅修主教說：沒有靈魂的肉體並不說話。優西比烏主教說：神在肉體中按肉體說話，當祂說：『你們為甚麼想要殺我這個人？』（約八40）這話是誰說的？帕拉迪烏說：神的兒子。安波羅修主教說：那麼神的兒子按其神性是神，按肉體是人。帕拉迪烏說：祂取了肉體。優西比烏主教說：那麼祂用了人的話語？帕拉迪烏說：祂取了人的肉體。安波羅修主教說：那麼讓他承認，使徒稱祂為順服的，並非按神性，乃是按肉體。
Even the flesh can say, 'God is greater than I.' Was it the flesh that spoke, or the divinity, since the flesh was there? Bishop Ambrose said: Flesh without a soul does not speak. Bishop Eusebius said: God in the flesh spoke according to the flesh, when He said, 'Why do you persecute me, a man?' (John 8:40). Who said this? Palladius said: The Son of God. Bishop Ambrose said: Therefore the Son of God is God according to His divinity, and man according to the flesh. Palladius said: He took flesh. Bishop Eusebius said: Then He used human words? Palladius said: He took human flesh. Bishop Ambrose said: Let him say that the Apostle called Him subject not according to His divinity, but according to the flesh.
6:39
Scriplum est enim : « Humiliavit se metipsum, factus obediens usque ad mortem (Phi lip. II, 8). » In quo ergo mortem gustavit? Palladius dixit: Quia se humiliavit. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Non divinilas, sed caro humiliata est atque subjecLa. Et addidit: Creaturam perfectam bene dixit Arius, an male dixit ? Palladius dixit: Ego tibi non respondeo, auctori talem non habenti. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Profitere quod vis. Palladius dixit: Non respondeo vobis. Sabinus episcopus dixit: Pro Ario non respondes ? ad interrogata non respondes? Palladius dixit: Pro Ario ego non respondi. Sabinus episcopus dixit: Usque adeo 498 respon disti, ut Filium Dei negares potentem, negares ve rum Deum.
因為經上記著：『祂自己卑微，存心順服，以至於死』（腓二8）。那麼祂是在甚麼事上嘗了死味？帕拉迪烏說：因祂自己卑微了。安波羅修主教說：被卑微並順服的並非神性，乃是肉體。他又補充說：亞流稱祂為一個完全的受造物，他是說得對，還是說得不對？帕拉迪烏說：我不回答你這沒有權柄的人。安波羅修主教說：隨你宣認甚麼。帕拉迪烏說：我不回答你們。撒比努斯主教說：你不為亞流回答嗎？你對所問的不回答嗎？帕拉迪烏說：我並沒有為亞流回答。撒比努斯主教說：你已回答到這地步——你否認了神的兒子有大能，否認了祂是真神。
For it is written: 'He humbled Himself, becoming obedient unto death' (Phil. 2:8). In what, then, did He taste death? Palladius said: Because He humbled Himself. Bishop Ambrose said: It was not the divinity, but the flesh, that was humbled and made subject. And he added: Did Arius speak well when he called Him a perfect creature, or did he speak ill? Palladius said: I do not answer you, who have no authority. Bishop Ambrose said: Profess what you will. Palladius said: I do not answer you. Bishop Sabinus said: Do you not answer for Arius? Do you not answer the questions put to you? Palladius said: I have not answered for Arius. Bishop Sabinus said: You have answered to this extent—that you have denied the Son of God to be mighty, denied Him to be true God.
6:40
Palladius dixit: Ego te judicem non patior, quem impietatis arguo. Sabinus episcopus dixit: Ipse nos coegisti sederc. Palladius dixit: Mandavi ut sederetis, ut argue rem vos. Quare subripuistis imperatori? Ut plenum concilium non esset, obripuistis. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Cum Arii impietates te gerentur, et impietas tua paritcr condemnata esi, quae consensit Arianæ impietati. Placuit tibi in media epistolæ lectione proponere quod volebas. Respon sum tibi est, quemadmodum Patrem majorem dixe rit Filius Dei, eo quod secundum carnis susceptio nem Filius majorem Patrem dixerit.
帕拉迪烏說：我不能容你作審判官，我控告你不虔。撒比努斯主教說：是你自己強迫我們坐下的。帕拉迪烏說：我吩咐你們坐下，是為要控告你們。你們為何瞞著皇帝行事？你們暗中行事，使全會議不得召開。安波羅修主教說：當亞流的諸般不虔被揭露時，你自己的不虔也同樣被定了罪，因它附和了亞流派的不虔。你在書信宣讀到一半時，竟隨意提出你所要的。你已得了回答：神的兒子稱聖父更大，乃是因為按取肉體而言，聖子才稱聖父更大。
Palladius said: I will not endure you as judge, whom I accuse of impiety. Bishop Sabinus said: You yourself compelled us to sit. Palladius said: I gave order that you should sit, so that I might accuse you. Why did you go behind the emperor's back? You acted by stealth, so that there should not be a full council. Bishop Ambrose said: When the impieties of Arius were uncovered, your own impiety was likewise condemned, which has consented to the Arian impiety. It pleased you, in the middle of the reading of the letter, to propose what you wished. You have been answered as to how the Son of God called the Father greater, namely because, according to the assumption of the flesh, the Son called the Father greater.
6:41
Proposuisti etiam subjectum esse Filium Dei, et in hoc respon sum tibi est, quia subjeclus Filius Dei secundum carnem esi, non secundum divinitatem. Habes pro fessionem nostram, nunc audi caetera. Quoniam tibi responsum est, responde ad ea quae leguntur. Palladius dixit: Non tibi respondeo, quia quæcun que ego dixi, non sunt scripta. Vestra tantummodo scribuntur verba. Non vobis respondeo. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Omnia vides scribi. De nique quæ scripta sunt, abundant ad tuae impietatis indicium. Et addidit: Creaturam dicis Christum, an negas ? Palladius dixit: Non respondeo. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Ante horam citra actam, cum legeretur quia Arius dixit creaturam Christum, negasti.
你也提出神的兒子是順服的，在這一點上你也已得了回答：神的兒子是按肉體順服，並非按神性。你已有我們的宣認；如今要聽其餘的。既然你已得了回答，就請回答所宣讀的內容。帕拉迪烏說：我不回答你，因為凡我所說的都沒有記下來。只有你們的話被記下來。我不回答你們。安波羅修主教說：你看，一切都在被記錄。事實上，已記下來的，足以充分證明你的不虔。他又補充說：你稱基督為受造物嗎，還是否認？帕拉迪烏說：我不回答。安波羅修主教說：方才當宣讀到亞流稱基督為受造物時，你曾否認過。
You also proposed that the Son of God is subject, and on this point you have been answered: that the Son of God is subject according to the flesh, not according to His divinity. You have our profession; now hear the rest. Since you have been answered, answer to the things that are being read. Palladius said: I do not answer you, because whatever I have said is not written down. Only your words are written down. I do not answer you. Bishop Ambrose said: You see that everything is being written. Indeed, the things that have been written are abundant enough as evidence of your impiety. And he added: Do you call Christ a creature, or do you deny it? Palladius said: I do not answer. Bishop Ambrose said: A while ago, when it was read that Arius called Christ a creature, you denied it.
6:42
Oblatum est tibi ut damnares perfidiam, noluisti. Vel nunc dic, utrum natus ex Patre Chri stus sit, an creatus. Palladius dixit: Si vultis, exceptores nostri ve niant, et sic totum excipiatur. Sabinus episcopus dixit: Adducat suos exceptores. Palladius dixit : Pleno concilio vobis responde bimus. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: AUalus in tractatu Ni cæni concilii subscripsit. Neget factum quia venit ad concilium. Dicat hodie utrum subscripserit in tractatu Nicaeni concilii, an non. Cumque Attalus reticeret, Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Attalus presbyter, licet inter Arianos sit, ta men habet auctoritalem loquendi.
曾有機會讓你譴責這背道之說，你卻不肯。或者至少現在說明：基督是從聖父所生，還是受造的。帕拉迪烏說：你們若願意，讓我們的記錄員前來，這樣好把一切都記下來。撒比努斯主教說：讓他帶他自己的記錄員前來。帕拉迪烏說：在全會議中我們才回答你們。安波羅修主教說：阿塔魯斯在尼西亞會議的記錄上署過名。讓他否認自己曾來到那會議。讓他今天說明，他是否在尼西亞會議的記錄上署過名。阿塔魯斯卻保持緘默，安波羅修主教說：阿塔魯斯長老雖在亞流派中，仍有發言的權柄。
You were offered the chance to condemn the perfidy, and you would not. Or at least now say whether Christ was born of the Father, or created. Palladius said: If you wish, let our recorders come, and so let everything be taken down. Bishop Sabinus said: Let him bring forward his own recorders. Palladius said: In a full council we will answer you. Bishop Ambrose said: Attalus subscribed in the proceedings of the Council of Nicaea. Let him deny that he came to the council. Let him say today whether he subscribed in the proceedings of the Council of Nicaea, or not. And when Attalus kept silent, Bishop Ambrose said: Attalus the presbyter, although he is among the Arians, nevertheless has the authority to speak.
6:43
Libere profiteatur utrum subscripserit in tractatu Nicæni concilii sub episcopo suo Agrippino, an non. Attalus dixit :499 Jam dixisti me aliquoties damnatum, non tibi respondeo. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Subscripsisti in tractatu concilii Nicæni, aut non? Attalus dixit : Non tibi respondeo. Palladius dixit : Modo vultis tractatum plenum haberi, aut non ? Chromatius presbyter dixit: Creaturam non negasti. potentiam negasti, omnia negasti quae fides catholica profitetur. Sabinus episcopus dixit : Testes sumus nos Atta tum subscripsisse in concilio Nicæno, et nunc nolle respondere. Quid cunctis videtur? Cumque Attalus reticeret, Ambrosius episcopus dixit:
讓他自由地宣認，他是否在他自己的主教阿格里皮努斯之下，於尼西亞會議的記錄上署過名。阿塔魯斯說：你已經多次說我被定罪了；我不回答你。安波羅修主教說：你在尼西亞會議的記錄上署過名嗎，還是沒有？阿塔魯斯說：我不回答你。帕拉迪烏說：你們是否願意這會議完整地召開，還是不？克羅馬提烏長老說：你沒有否認受造物，你否認了大能，你否認了大公信仰所宣認的一切。撒比努斯主教說：我們可以作證，阿塔魯斯在尼西亞會議上署過名，如今卻拒絕回答。眾人有何見解？阿塔魯斯卻保持緘默，安波羅修主教說：
Let him freely profess whether he subscribed in the proceedings of the Council of Nicaea under his own bishop Agrippinus, or not. Attalus said: You have already said several times that I am condemned; I do not answer you. Bishop Ambrose said: Did you subscribe in the proceedings of the Council of Nicaea, or not? Attalus said: I do not answer you. Palladius said: Do you wish the proceedings to be held in full, or not? Chromatius the presbyter said: You did not deny the creature; you denied the power; you denied everything that the catholic faith professes. Bishop Sabinus said: We are witnesses that Attalus subscribed in the Council of Nicaea, and now refuses to answer. What seems good to all? And when Attalus kept silent, Bishop Ambrose said:
6:44
Dicat utrum subscripserit in tractatu concilii Nicæni, aut non. Palladius dixit: Exceptor vester et noster stent, et omnia scribant. Valerianus episcopus dixit : Jam quæ dixisti et negasti, scripta sunt omnia. Palladius dixit: Dicite quod vultis. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Quia sæpius vult dam nari Palladius, qui jam frequenter damnatus est, lego epistolam Arii, quam ille noluit condemnare. Profi temini quod vobis videtur. Omnes episcopi dixerunt : Legatur. Et recitata est : NATO AUTEM NON PUTATIVE, et re liqua. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Respondi tibi de ma- jore, respondi tibi et de subjecto, nunc et ipse re sponde. Palladius dixit:
讓他說明，他是否在尼西亞會議的記錄上署過名。帕拉迪烏說：讓你們的記錄員和我們的記錄員都在場，讓他們把一切都記下來。瓦勒利安主教說：你已經說過並否認的事，全都記下來了。帕拉迪烏說：隨你們怎麼說。安波羅修主教說：既然帕拉迪烏——這已經屢次被定罪的人——更是常想被定罪，我便宣讀亞流那封他不肯譴責的書信。請你們宣告你們的看法。眾主教都說：宣讀吧。於是宣讀了：『而且祂是被生的，並非僅是表面上的』，以及其餘的話。安波羅修主教說：論到「更大」我已回答了你，論到「順服」我也已回答了你；現在輪到你自己回答。帕拉迪烏說：
Let him say whether he subscribed in the proceedings of the Council of Nicaea, or not. Palladius said: Let your recorder and ours stand by, and let them write everything down. Bishop Valerianus said: The things you have already said and denied are all written down. Palladius said: Say what you will. Bishop Ambrose said: Since Palladius, who has already frequently been condemned, more often wishes to be condemned, I read the letter of Arius, which he refused to condemn. Profess what seems good to you. All the bishops said: Let it be read. And it was read out: 'BORN, MOREOVER, NOT IN APPEARANCE,' and the rest. Bishop Ambrose said: I have answered you concerning the 'greater,' I have answered you also concerning the 'subject'; now you yourself answer. Palladius said:
6:45
Non respondebo, nisi auctores veniant post dominicam diem. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Veneras tractaturus, sed posteaqoam objeci tibi, vidisti Arii epistolam, quam damnare noluisti, asserere autem non potes : idcirco nunc refugis et cavillaris. Plenarie ipsam recitato : ad singula die. Utrum Christus creatus videatur, an fuit quando non fuit Christus, an vero semper fuit unigenitus Dei Filius. Cum Arii epistolam audieris, aut damna, aut proba. Palladius dixit: Cum impietatis te arguam, te judice non utor. Transgressor es. Sabinus episcopus dixit: Quas impietates objicis fratri nostro et consacerdoti Ambrosio ? dicito. Palladius dixit: Jam vobis dixi :
在主日之後，若我方的權威之人不來，我就不回答。安波羅修主教說：你本是來辯論的，但我一質問你，你看見了亞流那封你不肯譴責的書信，卻又不能為它辯護：所以你如今逃避、強辯。把它完整地宣讀一遍：逐條回答。基督是否顯為受造，是否曾有一時基督不存在，抑或神的獨生子始終存在。當你聽了亞流的書信，要麼譴責它，要麼贊同它。帕拉迪烏說：既然我控告你不虔，我就不用你作審判官。你是個違法者。撒比努斯主教說：你控告我們的弟兄、同作祭司的安波羅修甚麼不虔？說來聽聽。帕拉迪烏說：我已經告訴你們了：
I will not answer, unless the authorities come after the Lord's day. Bishop Ambrose said: You had come to dispute, but after I confronted you, you saw the letter of Arius, which you refused to condemn, yet you cannot defend it: therefore you now take flight and quibble. Read it through in full: answer point by point. Whether Christ is seen to be created, or whether there was a time when Christ was not, or rather whether the only-begotten Son of God always was. When you have heard the letter of Arius, either condemn it, or approve it. Palladius said: Since I accuse you of impiety, I do not use you as judge. You are a transgressor. Bishop Sabinus said: What impieties do you charge against our brother and fellow-priest Ambrose? Tell us. Palladius said: I have already told you:
6:46
Pleno concilio respondebo, et praesentibus auctoribus. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : In consessu fratrum meorum cupio confutari et redargui. Quæ igitur impie dixerim, dicito. Sed impius tibi videor, qui pie tatem astruo. Sabinus episcopus 500 dixit: Ergo impius tibi videtur, qui Arii blasphemias arguit? Palladius dixit: Ego non negavi bonum Filium Dei. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Dicis ergo Christum Deum bonum ? Palladius dixit: Non vobis respondeo. Valerianus episcopus dixit: Nolite multum adigere Palladium, non potest vera nostra simpliciter confi teri. Ipsius enim conscientia duplici blasphemia con fusa est. Nam a Photinianis est ordinatus, et cum ipsis est damnatus;
在全會議中我才回答，並要在權威之人面前回答。安波羅修主教說：在我眾弟兄的聚集中，我倒願意被駁倒、被辯倒。那麼請告訴我，我說了甚麼不虔的話。但我這建立虔敬的人，在你看來竟是不虔的。撒比努斯主教說：這樣，那駁斥亞流褻瀆之言的人，在你看來竟是不虔的嗎？帕拉迪烏說：我並沒有否認神的兒子是善的。安波羅修主教說：那麼你說基督是善的神嗎？帕拉迪烏說：我不回答你。瓦勒利安主教說：不要太逼帕拉迪烏；他不能爽快地承認我們的真理。因為他的良心被雙重褻瀆所攪亂。因他是由弗提努派所按立的，並與他們一同被定罪；
In a full council I will answer, and in the presence of the authorities. Bishop Ambrose said: In the assembly of my brethren I desire to be refuted and confuted. Tell me, then, what I have said impiously. But I seem impious to you, who build up true religion. Bishop Sabinus said: So he seems impious to you who refutes the blasphemies of Arius? Palladius said: I have not denied that the Son of God is good. Bishop Ambrose said: Do you say, then, that Christ is good God? Palladius said: I do not answer you. Bishop Valerianus said: Do not press Palladius too hard; he cannot simply confess our truths. For his conscience is confounded by a double blasphemy. For he was ordained by the Photinians, and was condemned together with them;
6:47
et nunc plenius damnabitur. Palladius dixit: Hoc proba. Sabinus episcopus dixit : Non aliter poterat Chri stum verum negare, nisi auctores suos sequeretur. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Objecisti me esse im- pium : hoc proba. Palladius dixit: Expositionem nostram afferimus. Cum attulerimus, tunc disputatio habebitur. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Damna impietatem Arii. Cum reficeret Palladius, Eusebius episcopus dixit : Superfluis immoramur. Tot impietates Arii Palladius noluit condemnare, imo potius asserendo confessus est. Hunc qui non damnat, similis illius est, ct hæ reticus jure dicendus est. Omnes episcopi dixerunt: A nobis omnibus ana thema sit Palladio. Ambrosius episcopus dixit:
如今他要更充分地被定罪。帕拉迪烏說：證明這事。撒比努斯主教說：他若不跟隨自己的權威之人，就無法否認真基督。安波羅修主教說：你曾控告我不虔：證明這事。帕拉迪烏說：我們要呈上我們的陳述。當我們呈上之後，辯論才舉行。安波羅修主教說：譴責亞流的不虔。帕拉迪烏卻遲疑，優西比烏主教說：我們在多餘之事上拖延。亞流如此眾多的不虔，帕拉迪烏都拒絕譴責——其實他更藉自己的主張承認了這些。誰不譴責這人，誰就與他相同，理當被稱為異端。眾主教都說：我們眾人都咒詛帕拉迪烏。安波羅修主教說：
and now he will be more fully condemned. Palladius said: Prove this. Bishop Sabinus said: He could not deny the true Christ in any other way except by following his own authorities. Bishop Ambrose said: You have charged that I am impious: prove this. Palladius said: We bring forward our exposition. When we have brought it forward, then the disputation will be held. Bishop Ambrose said: Condemn the impiety of Arius. And when Palladius hung back, Bishop Eusebius said: We are delaying over superfluous matters. So many impieties of Arius Palladius has refused to condemn—indeed, he has rather confessed them by his assertions. He who does not condemn this man is like him, and must rightly be called a heretic. All the bishops said: From all of us, let there be anathema upon Palladius. Bishop Ambrose said:
6:48
Acquiescis ut cætera legantur, Palladi ? Palladius dixit: Date auditores, veniant ex utraque parte exceptores. Non potestis esse judices si audi tores non habuerimus ; et nisi ex utrane parte vene. rint qui audiant, non vobis respondemus. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Quos quaeritis audi tores Palladius dixit : Sunt hic honorati multi. Sabinus episcopus dixit : Post tot blasphemias auditores petis? Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Sacerdotes de laicis judicare debent, non laici de sacerdotibus ; sed tamen quos judices petas dicito. Palladius dixit : Auditores veniant. Chromatius presbyter dixit: Salva condemnalione sacerdotali, quin et qui Palladii sunt etiam in pleno legantur. Palladius dixit:
帕拉迪烏，你同意宣讀其餘的內容嗎？帕拉迪烏說：請提供聽眾；讓雙方都派記錄員前來。你們若沒有聽眾，就不能作審判官；除非雙方都有人前來旁聽，我們就不回答你們。安波羅修主教說：你尋求甚麼樣的聽眾？帕拉迪烏說：這裡有許多有身分的人。撒比努斯主教說：說了這麼多褻瀆的話之後，你還求聽眾嗎？安波羅修主教說：祭司應當審判平信徒，而非平信徒審判祭司；但無論如何，請說出你尋求甚麼樣的審判官。帕拉迪烏說：讓聽眾前來。克羅馬提烏長老說：在保留祭司會議定罪權的前提下，連屬乎帕拉迪烏的那些內容也讓它在全會議前完整宣讀。帕拉迪烏說：
Do you agree that the rest be read, Palladius? Palladius said: Provide hearers; let recorders come from both sides. You cannot be judges if we have no hearers; and unless men come from both sides to listen, we do not answer you. Bishop Ambrose said: What hearers do you seek? Palladius said: There are many men of rank here. Bishop Sabinus said: After so many blasphemies, do you ask for hearers? Bishop Ambrose said: Priests ought to judge concerning laymen, not laymen concerning priests; but nevertheless tell us what judges you seek. Palladius said: Let the hearers come. Chromatius the presbyter said: Saving the priestly condemnation, let those things also which are of Palladius be read in full. Palladius said:
6:49
Non permittantur loqui auditores, veniant et ex utraque parte exceptores, et responde bunt vobis hi in concilio generali. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Etsi in multis impieta tibus deprehensus sit, erubescimus tamen ut videa tur 501 qui sacerdotium sibi vindicat a laicis esse damnatus. Ac per hoc, quoniam et in hoc ipso dam nandus est qui laicorum exspectat sententiam, cum magis de laicis sacerdotes debeant judicare, juxta ea quae hodie audivimus Palladium profitentem, et juxta ea quae condemnare noluit, pronuntio illum sacerdotio indignum et curandum ut in loco ejus ca tholicus ordinetur. Omnes episcopi dixerunt : Anathema Palladio. Ambrosius episcopus dixit:
不要准許聽眾發言；也讓雙方都派記錄員前來，這些人要在普世會議中回答你們。安波羅修主教說：他雖已被查出陷在許多不虔之中，我們卻仍以為羞恥，竟讓一個自稱有祭司職分的人顯為被平信徒所定罪。因此，既然連在這一點上他也當被定罪——他竟等候平信徒的判斷，而祭司本當審判平信徒——那麼，按著我們今天聽見帕拉迪烏所宣認的，並按著他所拒絕譴責的，我宣判他不配作祭司，並當設法在他的位上按立一位大公信仰的人。眾主教都說：咒詛帕拉迪烏。安波羅修主教說：
Let the hearers not be permitted to speak; let recorders come from both sides also, and these men will answer you in a general council. Bishop Ambrose said: Even though he has been caught in many impieties, we are nevertheless ashamed that one who claims the priesthood for himself should be seen to be condemned by laymen. And on this account, since on this very point also he is to be condemned who awaits the verdict of laymen—whereas priests ought rather to judge concerning laymen—in accordance with the things which we have heard today Palladius professing, and in accordance with the things which he refused to condemn, I pronounce him unworthy of the priesthood, and that care be taken that a catholic be ordained in his place. All the bishops said: Anathema upon Palladius. Bishop Ambrose said:
6:50
Imperator clementissi- mus et Christianus sacerdotum judicio causam a, et ut ipsi arbitri essent altercationis in quid constituis semus. Quoniam igitur nobis judicium videtur de latum, interpres est Scriptura : condemnemus Pal ladium, qui impii Arii noluit damnare sententiam. Et quia ipse Dei Filium sempiternum, et cætera quæ actis hærent, negavit: ergo anathema habeatur. Omnes episcopi dixerunt : Omnes condemnemus eum: anathema habeatur. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Quoniam omnes con sistunt viri Christiani, et Deo probati fralres, et consacerdotes nostri, dicat unusquisque quod sibi videtur. Valerianus episcopus dixit : Mihi quidem videtur quia qui Arium defendit, Arianus est :
至仁慈、屬基督的皇帝已將此案交付祭司們審斷，並要他們親自作這爭端的仲裁者，按我們所決定的去裁決。既然審判權看來已交託給我們，聖經就是我們的釋義者：讓我們定帕拉迪烏的罪，因他拒絕譴責不虔的亞流之教說。又因他自己否認神的兒子是永恆的，以及其餘附於這案卷的話：所以當受咒詛。眾主教都說：讓我們眾人都定他的罪；當受咒詛。安波羅修主教說：既然在此的全是屬基督的人，是神所悅納的弟兄，是我們同作祭司的，就讓各人說出自己的看法。瓦勒利安主教說：依我看來，凡為亞流辯護的就是亞流派；
The most clement and Christian emperor entrusted the case to the judgment of the priests, and that they themselves should be arbiters of the dispute in whatever we might determine. Since therefore the judgment seems to have been delegated to us, Scripture is our interpreter: let us condemn Palladius, who refused to condemn the sentence of the impious Arius. And because he himself has denied that the Son of God is eternal, and the other things that cleave to the acts, let him therefore be held anathema. All the bishops said: Let us all condemn him; let him be held anathema. Bishop Ambrose said: Since all here present are Christian men, and brethren approved by God, and our fellow-priests, let each one say what seems good to him. Bishop Valerianus said: To me indeed it seems that whoever defends Arius is an Arian;
6:51
qui blasphe- mias ipsius non condemnat, ipse blasphemus est. Ideoque hujusmodi hominem consortio sacerdotum censeo esse alienum. Palladius dixit: Coepistis ludere? ludite : sine con cilio Orientali vobis non respondemus. Anemius episcopus Sirmiensis dixit : Quicunque hæreses Arianas non condemnat, Arianus sit necesse est. Hunc igitur alienum etiam a nostra communione et sacerdotali coetu denuo privatum esse censemus. Constantius episcopus Arausicus dixit :
凡不譴責他褻瀆之言的，自己就是褻瀆者。因此我判定，這樣的人當與祭司的團契隔絕。帕拉迪烏說：你們開始玩弄了嗎？盡管玩吧：沒有東方會議在場，我們不回答你們。西爾米烏姆主教阿涅米烏說：凡不譴責亞流派異端的，必然是亞流派。所以這人，我們判定他要再次被剝奪，連我們的共融與祭司的團體都當與他無分。奧朗日主教君士坦提烏說：
whoever does not condemn his blasphemies, is himself a blasphemer. And therefore I judge a man of this sort to be a stranger to the fellowship of priests. Palladius said: Have you begun to play games? Play on: without the Eastern council we do not answer you. Anemius, bishop of Sirmium, said: Whoever does not condemn the Arian heresies must necessarily be an Arian. This man therefore we judge to be once again deprived even of our communion and the priestly assembly, as a stranger to it. Constantius, bishop of Orange, said:
6:52
Palladium Arii discipulum, cujus impietates jam olim damnatae sunt a patribus nostris in concilio Nicæno, et nunc hodie prolatæ, cum recenserentur Palladio singulæ, non confusus est, dum Dei Filium a Deo Patre esse alie num cum creatura confiletur, cum temporalem dicit, Dominum verum negat, in sempiternum censeo esse damnandum. Justus episcopus dixit: Palladium, qui blasphemias Arii damnare noluit, sed etiam magis 502 has confiteri videtur, censeo ulterius sacerdotem dici non posse, nec inter episcopos deputari. Eventius episcopus Ticiniensis dixit : Palladium, qui impietatem Arii damnare noluit, arbitror a con sortio sacerdotali in perpetuum esse remotum.
帕拉迪烏，亞流的門徒——他的諸般不虔，早已被我們的列祖在尼西亞會議中定罪，如今又於今日被提出——當這些不虔之言一條條向他宣讀時，他竟毫不羞愧，因他承認神的兒子與聖父神隔絕、與受造物同列，又稱祂是暫時的，並否認祂是真主：對此人，我判定他當永遠被定罪。優斯圖斯主教說：帕拉迪烏既拒絕譴責亞流的褻瀆，反倒看似還承認這些，我判定他不再能被稱為祭司，也不再能列入主教之中。提契努姆（帕維亞）主教埃溫提烏說：帕拉迪烏既拒絕譴責亞流的不虔，我認為他當永遠被逐出祭司的團契。
Palladius, the disciple of Arius—whose impieties were long ago condemned by our fathers in the Council of Nicaea, and now today brought forward—was not put to shame when they were recited to him one by one, since he confesses that the Son of God is alien from God the Father, classed with the creature, since he calls Him temporal and denies Him to be the true Lord: him I judge worthy to be condemned for ever. Bishop Justus said: Palladius, who refused to condemn the blasphemies of Arius, but rather seems even to confess them, I judge can no longer be called a priest, nor be reckoned among the bishops. Eventius, bishop of Pavia, said: Palladius, who refused to condemn the impiety of Arius, I deem to be removed for ever from the fellowship of priests.
6:53
Abundantius episcopus Tridentinus dixit : Cum evidentes blasphemias Palladius defendat, damnatum se cx concilio Aquileiensi cognoscat. Euscbius episcopus Bononiensis dixit: Quia impie- tales Arii diabolico stylo conscriptas, quas non Ii cebat nec ad aures admittere, Palladius non solum noluit condemnare, sed et earum exstitit assertor, negando Filium Dei Filium verum, Dominum bonum, Dominum sapientem, Dominum sempiternum, hunc a ccetu sacerdotali, et mea sententia, et omnium catholicorum judicio arbitror jure esse damnatum. Sabinus episcopus Placentinus dixit :
特倫特主教阿本丹提烏說：既然帕拉迪烏為明顯的褻瀆辯護，就讓他知道，他已被亞奎萊亞會議定罪。波隆那主教優西比烏說：因為亞流那些以魔鬼之筆寫成、連聽都不可入耳的不虔之言，帕拉迪烏不但拒絕譴責，反倒顯為它們的辯護者，否認神的兒子是真兒子、是善的主、是智慧的主、是永恆的主：對此人，按祭司團體的判斷，並按我自己的判決，以及眾大公信徒的判斷，我認定他理當被定罪。皮亞琴察主教撒比努斯說：
Abundantius, bishop of Trent, said: Since Palladius defends manifest blasphemies, let him know that he is condemned by the Council of Aquileia. Eusebius, bishop of Bologna, said: Because the impieties of Arius, composed with a diabolical pen—which it was not even lawful to admit to the ears—Palladius not only refused to condemn, but even proved himself an advocate of them, denying the Son of God to be the true Son, the good Lord, the wise Lord, the eternal Lord: this man, by the judgment of the priestly assembly, both by my own verdict and by the judgment of all catholics, I deem rightly condemned. Sabinus, bishop of Piacenza, said:
6:54
Quoniam cunctis patefactum est Palladium, Arianæ perfidiæ auctorem, ejusque impietatem tenere, quæ contra evangelica et apostolica instituta venit, justa in eum totius concilii lata sententia est : qui mcx licet pravitatis fF. parvitatis] sententia sacerdotio denuo privatus ex hoc sacrosancto coetu jure pellatur. Felix et Numidius legati Afrorum dixerunt : Aria nae hæresis sectæ, in qua Palladius in Aquileiensi synodo declaratus est, anathema. Sed et eos qui contra veritatem Nicænæ synodi repugnantes sunt, condemnamus. Limenius episcopus Vercellensis dixit : Arianam doctrinam sæpe esse damnatam manifestum est;
既然眾人都已明白，帕拉迪烏是亞流派背道之說的倡導者，並持守其不虔，那違背福音與使徒典章的教說，全會議已對他作出公正的判決：讓他因其敗壞（另有抄本作：因其卑微）的判決，再次被剝奪祭司職分，理當被逐出這至聖的聚集。非洲眾教會的使節腓力斯與努米迪烏說：咒詛亞流派異端之宗派，帕拉迪烏在亞奎萊亞會議中被宣告屬於此宗派。但我們也定那些起來敵擋尼西亞會議真理之人的罪。維切利主教利美尼烏說：亞流派的教義屢次被定罪，這是顯而易見的；
Since it has been made plain to all that Palladius is an author of the Arian perfidy, and that he holds its impiety, which runs counter to the evangelical and apostolic ordinances, a just sentence of the whole council has been passed against him: let him, deprived once again of the priesthood by the sentence of his depravity (other reading: of his pettiness), be rightly expelled from this most sacred assembly. Felix and Numidius, the legates of the Africans, said: Anathema upon the sect of the Arian heresy, in which Palladius was declared to belong at the synod of Aquileia. But we also condemn those who set themselves in opposition against the truth of the Council of Nicaea. Limenius, bishop of Vercelli, said: It is manifest that the Arian doctrine has often been condemned;
6:55
et ideo Palladius conventus in hac sancta synodo Aqui leiensi, quo noluit corrigere vel emendare, sed magis probavit, deprehensibili se collutavit perfidia, quam se publice professus est tenere : hunc sententia mea et ego profiteor consortio sacerdotali esse privatum. Maximinus episcopus Emonensis dixit: Palladium, qui blasphemias Arii nec damnare voluit, sed magis ipse confessus est, juste ac merito esse damnatum et Dens novit, ct fidclium conscientia condemnavit. Exsuperantius episcopus Dertonensis dixit : Palla dium, qui sectam Arii vel cjus doctrinam damnare noluit, sed defendit, ut caeteri consortes mei damna vcrunt, etiam et ego condemno. 503 Bassianus episcopus Laudensis dixit :
因此帕拉迪烏被帶到亞奎萊亞這神聖的會議前，既拒絕改正或修正它，反倒贊同它，便使自己陷入明顯可查的背道之說，這背道他已公開宣認持守：對此人，按我自己的判決，我也宣告他當被剝奪祭司的團契。埃莫納主教馬克西米努說：帕拉迪烏不但拒絕譴責亞流的褻瀆，反倒自己承認這些，神知道他是公正而當得地被定罪，眾信徒的良心也已定他的罪。托爾托納主教埃克蘇佩蘭提烏說：帕拉迪烏既拒絕譴責亞流的宗派或其教義，反倒為之辯護，正如我其餘的同工已定他的罪，我也定他的罪。羅迪主教巴西安說：
and therefore Palladius, brought before this holy synod of Aquileia, since he refused to correct or amend it, but rather approved it, has entangled himself in a perfidy that can be plainly detected, which he has publicly professed to hold: this man, by my own sentence, I too profess to be deprived of the fellowship of the priesthood. Maximinus, bishop of Emona, said: Palladius, who not only refused to condemn the blasphemies of Arius, but rather confessed them himself, both God knows him to be justly and deservedly condemned, and the conscience of the faithful has condemned him. Exsuperantius, bishop of Tortona, said: Palladius, who refused to condemn the sect of Arius or his doctrine, but defended it, as my other colleagues have condemned him, I too condemn. Bassianus, bishop of Lodi, said:
6:56
Audivi, sicut et cæteri consacerdotes mei, impietates Arii, quas Palladius non solum non condemnavit, sed confirmavit. Hic anathema sit ct sacerdotio priva bitur. Philaster episcopus Brixianus dixit : Blasphemias et iniquitatem Palladii, qui Arianam doctrinam sequi tur ct defendit, una cum omnibus ego condemnavi. Constantius episcopus Siscianensis dixit : Palladium, qui blasphemias et impietates Arii non condemnavit, sicut et cxteri consacerdotes mei et ego censeo damnandum. Heliodorus episcopus Altiniensis dixit: Qui perfidiam Arii omniumque hæreticorum, quorum consors cst Palladius, hujus insipiens cor, qui veritatem non est conCessus, cum caeteris consacerdotibus meis pariter condemno.
我與我其餘同作祭司的弟兄一樣，都聽見了亞流的不虔，帕拉迪烏不但沒有譴責，反倒加以證實。讓此人受咒詛，並被剝奪祭司職分。布雷西亞主教斐拉斯特說：帕拉迪烏既跟隨並辯護亞流派的教義，他的褻瀆與不義，我已與眾人一同定罪。錫斯西亞主教君士坦提烏說：帕拉迪烏既不譴責亞流的褻瀆與不虔，我也與我其餘同作祭司的一樣，判定他當被定罪。阿爾提農主教赫利奧多魯說：凡跟隨亞流並一切異端之背道的——帕拉迪烏是他們的同夥——這人愚昧的心既不承認真理，我便與我其餘同作祭司的一同定他的罪。
I have heard, as have my other fellow-priests, the impieties of Arius, which Palladius not only did not condemn, but confirmed. Let this man be anathema, and let him be deprived of the priesthood. Philaster, bishop of Brescia, said: The blasphemies and iniquity of Palladius, who follows and defends the Arian doctrine, I have condemned together with all. Constantius, bishop of Siscia, said: Palladius, who did not condemn the blasphemies and impieties of Arius, like my other fellow-priests I too judge to be condemned. Heliodorus, bishop of Altinum, said: Whoever follows the perfidy of Arius and of all heretics—of whom Palladius is a partner—this man's foolish heart, who has not confessed the truth, I condemn together with my other fellow-priests alike.
6:57
Felix episcopus Jadertinus dixit : Palladium , qui blasphemavit Filium, sicut Arius , cum omnibus na riter condemno. Theodorus episcopus Octodorenaia dixit: Palladium, qui Christum Deum verum, coæternum Patri negavit, nec Christianum hunc, nec sacerdotem ullo modo censemus. Domninus episcopus Gratianopolitanus dixit: Palla dium in perfidia Arii permanentem, in perpetuum, sicut et fratres damnaverunt, ctiam et ego censeo esse damnandum. Proculus episcopus Massiliensium dixit :
扎達爾主教腓力斯說：帕拉迪烏既像亞流一樣褻瀆聖子，我便與眾人一同定他的罪。奧克托杜倫主教提奧多魯說：帕拉迪烏既否認基督是真神、與聖父同永，我們判定他絕不是基督徒，也不是祭司。格勒諾布勒主教多姆尼努說：帕拉迪烏既停留在亞流的背道中，正如眾弟兄也已定他的罪，我也判定他當永遠被定罪。馬賽主教普羅庫魯說：
Felix, bishop of Zadar, said: Palladius, who blasphemed the Son, as Arius did, I condemn together with all alike. Theodorus, bishop of Octodurum, said: Palladius, who denied that Christ is true God, coeternal with the Father, we deem in no way to be a Christian, nor a priest. Domninus, bishop of Grenoble, said: Palladius, remaining in the perfidy of Arius, I too judge to be condemned for ever, as the brethren also have condemned him. Proculus, bishop of Marseille, said:
6:58
Palladium, qui Arii blasphemias sub quadam impia haereditate non condemnando defendit, sicut hunc et plurimo rum jam venerabilium sacerdotum sententia blas phemum designavit, atque sacerdotio alienum duxit, mea pariter sententia in perpetuum condemnatum designat. Diogenes episcopus Genavensis dixit : Palladium, qui Christum Dominum Deum verum, similem et aequalem Patri dum non confitetur, ncgavit, damna tionem judico cum caLleris fratribus meis vel consa cerdotibus sortiri. Amantius episcopus Nicensis dixit: Palladium, qui sectam Arii non destruxit, secundum consacerdotum meorum judicium, etiam et ego condemno. Januarius episcopus dixit:
帕拉迪烏既在某種不虔的承襲之下，藉不譴責而為亞流的褻瀆辯護，正如許多已堪敬重的祭司之判決已標明他為褻瀆者，並判定他與祭司職分無分，我的判決照樣標明他當永遠被定罪。日內瓦主教狄奧根尼說：帕拉迪烏既不承認基督是主、是真神、與聖父相似並同等，便否認了祂，我判定他當與我其餘的弟兄並同作祭司的一同領受定罪。尼斯主教阿曼提烏說：帕拉迪烏既不剷除亞流的宗派，按我同作祭司之人的判斷，我也定他的罪。雅努阿里烏主教說：
Palladius, who defended the blasphemies of Arius under a certain impious inheritance by not condemning them, just as the verdict of very many already venerable priests has marked him out as a blasphemer and deemed him a stranger to the priesthood, my own sentence likewise marks out as condemned for ever. Diogenes, bishop of Geneva, said: Palladius, who, in not confessing Christ the Lord, true God, like and equal to the Father, denied Him, I judge to share in condemnation with my other brethren and fellow-priests. Amantius, bishop of Nice, said: Palladius, who did not destroy the sect of Arius, according to the judgment of my fellow-priests, I too condemn. Bishop Januarius said:
6:59
Sicut omnes consacer dotes mei damnaverunt Palladium, ita et ego pari judicio eum censeo esse damnandum. 504 Et cum Secundianus subripuisset, Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Audisti, Secundiane, cujusmodi Palladius impius sententiam, sacerdotali concilio damnatus, exceperit. Licet displicuerit nobis, quod ejus, hoc est Palladii non horrueris amentiam, tamen de te aliqua specialiter quaero, utrum Dei Filium Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum, vel non verum Deum dicas. Secundianus dixit : Qui negat Dominum verum esse Patrem Domini et Dei nostri Jesu Christi, non est Christianus, ncc qui negat Filium Dominum verum. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Deum verum Dci Filium confiteris ? Secundianus dixit :
正如我眾同作祭司的都已定帕拉迪烏的罪，我也以同樣的判斷認定他必當被定罪。塞昆迪安溜了進來，安波羅修主教說：塞昆迪安，你聽見了不虔的帕拉迪烏被祭司會議定罪、所領受的是何等判決。雖然我們不悅，因你並未對他——就是帕拉迪烏——的瘋狂感到憎惡，但我仍特別問你幾件事：你是否稱神的兒子、我們的主耶穌基督為真神，還是不？塞昆迪安說：凡否認我們的主神耶穌基督之父是真主的，就不是基督徒；凡否認聖子是真主的，也不是。安波羅修主教說：你承認神的兒子是真神嗎？塞昆迪安說：
Just as all my fellow-priests have condemned Palladius, so I too by equal judgment deem that he must be condemned. And when Secundianus had slipped in, Bishop Ambrose said: You have heard, Secundianus, what kind of sentence the impious Palladius, condemned by the priestly council, received. Although it has displeased us that you did not recoil from his—that is, Palladius'—madness, nevertheless I ask you in particular some things: whether you call the Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ, true God, or not. Secundianus said: Whoever denies that the Father of our Lord and God Jesus Christ is true Lord, is not a Christian; nor is he who denies that the Son is true Lord. Bishop Ambrose said: Do you confess the Son of God to be true God? Secundianus said:
6:60
Verum Dei Filium, unigcnilum Dci Filium verum dico. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Verum Deum dicis? Secundianus dixit: Verum unigenitum Filium quis negat verum Filium Dci ?. Eusebius episcopus dixit ; Non suflicit quod Filium Dei unigenitum confiteris ; nam hoc omnes coufi tentur; sed hoc movet quod Arius dixit Dominum solum Patrem, solum verum, negavit Filium Dei Dominum verum. Simpliciter Filium Dei Deum ve rum confiteris ? Secundianus dixit: Qui fuerit Arius ignoro, quid dixerit nescio : mecum loqueris vivus ad vivum. Illud dico quod Christus dixit: Unigenitum Filium se asserit Patris, Filius unigenitus : Deus est Dei Filius verus. Ambrosius episcopus dixit :
我說祂是神真實的兒子，是神的獨生、真實的兒子。安波羅修主教說：你說祂是真神嗎？塞昆迪安說：至於那真實的獨生子，誰否認祂是神真實的兒子呢？優西比烏主教說：你承認神的兒子是獨生的，這還不夠；因為人人都承認這事。但叫我們不安的是這一點：亞流說惟獨聖父是主、惟獨是真的，並否認神的兒子是真主。你是否爽快地承認神的兒子是真神？塞昆迪安說：亞流是誰，我不知道；他說了甚麼，我也不曉得。你是在與我說話，活人對活人。我所說的，就是基督所說的：祂自稱是聖父的獨生子，是獨生子：神是神真實的兒子。安波羅修主教說：
I say that He is the true Son of God, the only-begotten true Son of God. Bishop Ambrose said: Do you say He is true God? Secundianus said: As for the true only-begotten Son, who denies Him to be the true Son of God? Bishop Eusebius said: It is not enough that you confess the Son of God to be only-begotten; for all confess this. But this is what troubles us: that Arius said the Father alone is Lord, alone is true, and denied that the Son of God is true Lord. Do you simply confess the Son of God to be true God? Secundianus said: Who Arius was, I do not know; what he said, I do not know. You are speaking with me, living to a living man. This I say, which Christ said: He asserts Himself to be the only-begotten Son of the Father, the only-begotten Son: God is the true Son of God. Bishop Ambrose said:
6:61
Deus vcrus est, verus Deus Filius Deus. Et addidil: In Scripturis divinis scriptum est, « quia qui jurant super terram, jurabunt Deum verum (Isai. LXV, 16). » Quod utique de Christo esse non dubium est. Nos ergo verum Dcum profile mur, et fides nostra hæc est et professio, quia uni genitus Patris Filius, hoc est verus Deus. Die et tu de Deo vero, Dei Filium Deum verum. Secundianus dixit : De Deo vero. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Filius Dei Deus verus est ? Secundianus dixit : Ergo mendax. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : In hoc fraudem facis, ut non Deum verum dicas, sed Deum unigenitum, ac per hoc die simpliciter : Unigenilus Dei Filius Deus verus. Secundianus dixit :
祂是真神;聖子是真神,是神。他又補充說:在神聖的經卷中記著,「凡在地上起誓的,必指著真神起誓」(以賽亞書六十五章16節)。這話無疑是論到基督而說的。所以我們承認真神,我們的信德與宣認就是:父的獨生子乃是真神。你也當論到真神說,神的兒子是真神。塞昆迪亞努斯說:祂是出於真神。安波羅修主教說:神的兒子是真神嗎?塞昆迪亞努斯說:那麼祂就是說謊者了。安波羅修主教說:你在這裡行了欺詐,因為你不說「真神」,只說「獨生的神」;因此你當直率地說:神的獨生子是真神。塞昆迪亞努斯說:
He is true God; the Son is true God, God. And he added: In the divine Scriptures it is written, 'that those who swear upon the earth shall swear by the true God' (Isaiah 65:16). And there is no doubt that this is said of Christ. We therefore confess the true God, and this is our faith and profession: that the only-begotten Son of the Father is true God. Say you too concerning the true God that the Son of God is true God. Secundianus said: He is of the true God. Bishop Ambrose said: Is the Son of God true God? Secundianus said: Then he is a liar. Bishop Ambrose said: In this you commit a fraud, in that you do not say 'true God' but 'only-begotten God'; and therefore say plainly: the only-begotten Son of God is true God. Secundianus said:
6:62
Unigenitum dixi Dei Filium. Eusebius episcopus dixit : lloc Photinus non negat, hoc Sabellius confitetur. 505 Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Et qui hoc non confitetur, jure damnatur. Ac per hoc sæpe te con venio, licet cavillando negaveris veritatem. Non quaero ut tantummodo unigenitum Dci, Filium Dei dicas, sed etiam Deum verum. Secundianus dixit: Veritatis me servum profiteor. Quae dico non scribuntur, et quae dicis scribuntur. Christum verum Dei Filium dico. Quis negat Filium Dei veram esse? Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Qui negat unigenitum Dei Filium, anathema sit. Secundianus dixit : Deum verum unigenitum Fi lium Dei? Quid mihi profiteris, quod non est scri ptum Ambfosius episcopus dixit :
我說了神的獨生子。優西比烏主教說:這一點弗提努不否認,撒伯流也承認。安波羅修主教說:凡不承認這一點的,就被公義地定罪。為此我屢次催逼你,儘管你藉著詭辯否認了真理。我所要求的,不只是你稱祂為神的獨生子、神的兒子,更要稱祂為真神。塞昆迪亞努斯說:我承認自己是真理的僕人。我所說的沒有寫在經上,而你所說的卻寫在經上。我說基督是神真正的兒子。誰否認神的兒子是真的呢?安波羅修主教說:凡否認神獨生子的,當受咒詛。塞昆迪亞努斯說:神的獨生子,真神嗎?你為何要我承認那沒有寫在經上的事?安波羅修主教說:
I said the only-begotten Son of God. Bishop Eusebius said: This Photinus does not deny, this Sabellius confesses. Bishop Ambrose said: And whoever does not confess this is justly condemned. And on this account I press you often, although by quibbling you have denied the truth. I do not ask only that you call him the only-begotten of God, the Son of God, but also true God. Secundianus said: I profess myself a servant of the truth. What I say is not written, and what you say is written. I say that Christ is the true Son of God. Who denies that the Son of God is true? Bishop Ambrose said: Whoever denies the only-begotten Son of God, let him be anathema. Secundianus said: The only-begotten Son of God, true God? Why do you make me profess what is not written? Bishop Ambrose said:
6:63
Apertum sacrilegium est, quando Cbristum Dei Filium Arius Deum verum negavit. Secundianus dixit : Jesum Christum Filium Dei Deum, qui Christus dicatur Filius verus, Filium Dei dico. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Nondum resipuisli. Et adjecit : Ne quid illi videatur esse subreptum , confir met sententiam suant. Dicat ergo unigenitam Chri stum, Dei Filium, Deum verum. Secundianus dixit: Jam dixi. Quid mihi extorquere vis amplius? Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Quid dixisti? Certe si dixisses tanta, quod gloriose dicitur, sæpe repeten dum est. Secundianus dixit: Dictum est: « Sit sermo vester, est est; non non (Matlh. v, 5). » Ambrosius episcopus dixit:
當亞流否認基督神的兒子是真神時,這就是公然的褻瀆。塞昆迪亞努斯說:我說耶穌基督是神的兒子,是神,祂作為基督被稱為真正的兒子,神的兒子。安波羅修主教說:你還沒有醒悟過來。他又補充說:免得有什麼東西似乎被暗中加在他身上,讓他確認自己的話。所以讓他說,基督是獨生的、神的兒子、真神。塞昆迪亞努斯說:我已經說了。你還想從我口中逼出什麼來?安波羅修主教說:你說了什麼?誠然,你若說了如此重大的話,凡為榮耀而說的,理當屢屢重複。塞昆迪亞努斯說:經上說:「你們的話,是,就說是;不是,就說不是」(馬太福音五章37節)。安波羅修主教說:
It is open sacrilege, when Arius denied that Christ the Son of God is true God. Secundianus said: I say that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, God, who as Christ is called the true Son, the Son of God. Bishop Ambrose said: You have not yet come to your senses. And he added: Lest anything should seem to have been smuggled in upon him, let him confirm his own statement. Let him therefore say that Christ is the only-begotten, the Son of God, true God. Secundianus said: I have already said it. What more do you wish to wring out of me? Bishop Ambrose said: What have you said? Surely, if you had said so great a thing, what is spoken to one's glory ought to be repeated often. Secundianus said: It is said: 'Let your speech be Yea, yea; Nay, nay' (Matthew 5:37). Bishop Ambrose said:
6:64
Qui dicit ipsum Patrem Filium, sacrilegus est. Hoc a te quaero ut dicas de Deo vero Deum verum Dei Filium natum. Secundianus dixit: Filium a Deo genitum (dicente ipso, Genui te [Psal. CIX, 3]) Filium confitenlem se genitum esse dico. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: A Deo vero Deus verus est? Secundianus dixit : Et cum nomini etiam addis et verum, audis, qualis in te fides sit, et Christia nus es ? Eusebius episcopus dixit: Qui negavit illum Deum verum? Arius et Palladius negavit. Tu si Deum ve rum credis, debes simpliciter designare. Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Si non dixeris Deum verum de Deo vero natum esse, Christum negisti. Secundianus dixit: Interrogatus de Filio, dedi rc tponsum :
凡說父自己就是子的,乃是行褻瀆的人。我向你所求的是:你當論到真神說,神的兒子生為真神。塞昆迪亞努斯說:那從神所生的兒子(因為祂自己說「我生了你」[詩篇一百一十篇3節]),那承認自己是被生的兒子—祂,我承認。安波羅修主教說:祂是真神出於真神嗎?塞昆迪亞努斯說:當你在名稱上甚至加上「真」字時,你聽出你裡面是何等的信德,而你竟是個基督徒嗎?優西比烏主教說:誰否認祂是真神?是亞流和帕拉狄烏否認的。你若信祂是真神,就當直率地宣告。安波羅修主教說:你若不說真神是出於真神所生,你就否認了基督。塞昆迪亞努斯說:我被問及聖子的事,已作了回答:
Whoever says that the Father himself is the Son is a sacrilegious man. This I ask of you: that you say concerning the true God that the Son of God was born true God. Secundianus said: The Son begotten of God (since he himself says, 'I have begotten thee' [Psalm 110:3]), the Son confessing himself to have been begotten—him I confess. Bishop Ambrose said: Is he true God of the true God? Secundianus said: And when you add to the name even the word 'true,' do you hear what sort of faith is in you, and are you a Christian? Bishop Eusebius said: Who denied him to be true God? Arius and Palladius denied it. If you believe him to be true God, you ought to declare it plainly. Bishop Ambrose said: If you will not say that the true God was born of the true God, you have denied Christ. Secundianus said: Being questioned concerning the Son, I gave my answer:
6:65
quemadmodum deberem profiteri respon die Habemus vestram expositionem, 506 afferemus, legatur. Ambrosius dixit : Hodie afferre debueras : cæte rum subterfugere conaris. Professionem a me exige, et professionem a te exigo. Deus verus est Dei Fi lius? Secundianus dixit: Unigenitus est Deus Dei Filius. Et ego interrogo, unigenitus est? Ambrosius episcopus dixit: Ratione permoveat nos impietas et insipientia tua. Cum dicis Dcum verum unigenitum, non Deum verum dicis, sed verum uni genitum : ac per hoc, ut istam adimas quæstionem , ita responde. Ex Deo vero Deus verus est? Secundianus dixit: Ergo Deus Deum non genuit?
我按著我所當承認的作了回答。我們有你的解釋;我們會帶來,讓人宣讀。安波羅修說:你今天就該帶來;然而你卻設法溜走。你向我索取宣認,我也向你索取宣認。神的兒子是真神嗎?塞昆迪亞努斯說:神的兒子是獨生的神。我反過來問:祂是獨生的嗎?安波羅修主教說:願你的不敬虔與愚妄藉理性使我們有所行動。當你說「獨生的真神」時,你並非說「真神」,而是說「真正的獨生者」;因此,為要了結這個問題,你當這樣回答:祂是真神出於真神嗎?塞昆迪亞努斯說:那麼難道神沒有生神嗎?
as I ought to profess, I answered. We have your exposition; we will bring it, let it be read. Ambrose said: You ought to have brought it today; but for the rest you try to slip away. Demand a profession from me, and I demand a profession from you. Is the Son of God true God? Secundianus said: The Son of God is only-begotten God. And I in turn ask: Is he only-begotten? Bishop Ambrose said: Let your impiety and folly move us by reason. When you say 'only-begotten true God,' you do not say 'true God' but 'true only-begotten'; and therefore, that you may settle this question, answer thus: Is he true God of the true God? Secundianus said: Then did not God beget God?
6:66
Deus verus ille qui est, quod est genuit, unum verum unigenitum Filium genuit. Ambrosius dixit: Non confiteris Deum verum, sed vis dicere, verum unigenitum. Et ego unigenitum, sed dico et Deum verum. Secundianus dixit: Ego dico genitum a Patre verum genitum : dico omnibus. DE FIDE, IN PERSONA AMBROSII. a CAPUT PRIMUM. Ambrosius episcopus dixit : Multas quidem et gra ves haereses novimus a plurimis ebullire, et veneni vice ad intimum pectus canceris sui virus infundere (II Tim. II , 17). Sed vinci illi vel facile possunt, vel facile vitari, quorum prima propositione omne con silium pectoris proditur.
那位真神,那位自有者,生了祂所是的;祂生了一位真實的、獨生的兒子。安波羅修說:你不承認「真神」,卻想說「真正的獨生者」。我也說「獨生者」,但我同時說「真神」。塞昆迪亞努斯說:我說聖子是真正由父所生的;我向眾人這樣說。《論信德》,以安波羅修的身分而言。第一章。安波羅修主教說:我們確實知道,有許多嚴重的異端從眾多人口中沸騰而出,像毒液一般將其潰瘍之毒灌入人心的最深處(參提摩太後書二章17節)。但那些在第一個論點中就洩露了內心全部意圖的,或可輕易被駁倒,或可輕易躲避。
That true God who is, begot what he is; he begot one true only-begotten Son. Ambrose said: You do not confess 'true God,' but you wish to say 'true only-begotten.' I too say 'only-begotten,' but I also say 'true God.' Secundianus said: I say the Son truly begotten of the Father; I say this to all. ON THE FAITH, IN THE PERSON OF AMBROSE. CHAPTER ONE. Bishop Ambrose said: We have indeed known many and grave heresies to boil up from very many men, and like venom to pour the poison of their canker into the inmost breast (cf. 2 Timothy 2:17). But those can either easily be overcome or easily avoided, whose whole counsel of heart is betrayed in their first proposition.
6:67
At vero hi quibus 507 multa nobiscum paria sunt, facile possunt innoxias mentes et soli Deo deditas , fraudutenta societate percutere, dum malorum suorum virus per bona no- stra defendunt. Nihil enim periculosius his hæreticis esse potest, qui cum integre per omnia decurrant, uno tamen verbo, ac si veneni gutta, meram illam ac simplicem fidem dominicae et exinde aposlolicae tra ditionis inficiunt. Unde vehementer nobis cavendum est ne se vel sensibus vel auribus nostris hujusmodi aliquid latenter insinuet : quia nihil tam cogit in mortem, quam sub obtentu fidei integritatem ejus dem fidei violare. Ut enim gypsum aqua permix tum lac colore mentitur:
但那些在許多方面與我們相同的人,實在能輕易地藉著欺詐的交往,擊倒那些單單獻身於神、原本無害的心靈,因為他們用我們美好的事物來掩護自己惡毒之毒。因為再沒有比這些異端更危險的了:他們在一切事上都行得健全,卻用一個字,如同一滴毒藥,玷污了主那純潔簡樸的信德,進而玷污了使徒的傳統。因此我們必須極力提防,免得這類事物暗中潛入我們的心思或耳中;因為再沒有什麼比在信德的藉口下破壞那同一信德的純全更能將人推向死亡的了。因為正如石膏摻水冒充乳汁的顏色,
But truly those who have many things in common with us can easily strike harmless minds, devoted to God alone, with a fraudulent fellowship, while they defend the poison of their evils by means of our good things. For nothing can be more dangerous than these heretics, who, while they run their course soundly in all respects, yet with one word, as if with a drop of poison, infect that pure and simple faith of the Lord's and thence the apostolic tradition. Hence we must beware vehemently lest anything of this sort should secretly insinuate itself into our minds or ears; for nothing so drives a man to death as to violate, under the pretext of faith, the integrity of that same faith. For just as gypsum mixed with water counterfeits milk in color,
6:68
ita bic per verisimil em confessionem traditio inimica suggeritur. Qua de re non similitudo confessionis, sed sensus mentis est ponderandus, quo confessio ipsa firmatur. Denique si diligentius et accuraMus attendatis, cur voluerint de evangelica et apostolica fide, et de Patrum tradi tione, unius substantiæ nomen auferri, procul dubio probatis hæresim Arianam subtili compendio brevi jam sublato hoc nomine intromissam. Nec hoc quidem ego suspicione aut opinione collectum affirmo;
照樣,在此處,藉著貌似可信的宣認,一個敵對的傳統被偷偷塞入。關於這事,所當衡量的不是宣認的相似性,而是使宣認本身得以確立的內心意旨。最後,你若更殷勤、更精確地留意他們為何想要將「一體」(同質)之名從福音與使徒的信德、以及教父的傳統中除去,你必毫無疑問地看出,亞流異端正是藉著一個微妙的捷徑,在這名稱被除去之後潛入的。我斷言這事,並非出於猜疑或臆測;
so here, through a plausible confession, an inimical tradition is insinuated. Concerning which matter, not the likeness of the confession, but the sense of the mind by which the confession itself is established must be weighed. Finally, if you attend more diligently and accurately, why they wished the name of 'one substance' to be removed from the evangelical and apostolic faith and from the tradition of the Fathers, you will without doubt find that the Arian heresy was introduced by a subtle shortcut, once this name had been taken away. Nor indeed do I affirm this as gathered by suspicion or opinion;
6:69
nec (ut ipsi putaut) academicus disputator assisto, ut sim plices sensus verborum subtilitate contorqueam, sed ut contortos et pravos, tcnui argumento compositos, in lucem cognitionis exponam, quo facilius possit co gnita et comperta iniquitas ab omnibus evitari.
我也並非如他們所臆想的那樣,以學院派辯士的身分站在這裡,要用言辭的詭辯來扭曲那簡明的含義;而是要把那些被扭曲、被弄歪、用薄弱論據拼湊起來的含義,陳明在知識的光中,好叫這罪惡一經認清揭發,就更容易被眾人所躲避。
nor (as they themselves suppose) do I stand here as an Academic disputant, so as to twist simple meanings by subtlety of words; but in order that meanings that have been twisted and made crooked, composed by a flimsy argument, I may set forth into the light of knowledge, so that the iniquity, once recognized and discovered, may more easily be avoided by all.
6:70
Quæ etenim causa, quæve ratio exstitit, ut quod docen dum et quod credendum cunctis Ecclesiis fuerat tra ditum, quodque Patres nostri apostolici viri contra universas hæreses, et maxime Arianam, quasi quem dain obicem veritatis, quo omnes aditus pestiferæ doctrinæ obstruerent, sancto Spiritu inundati, ca tholica ratione posuerunt, non sine magno nisu ab bis qui nunc elogio Arianae labis addicti sunt, labo retur auferri, nisi ut Filium Dei mutabilem et con vertibilem, utpote non de propria Patris substantia, constitisse confingant:
究竟有什麼緣由、什麼理由,使得那原本傳給眾教會、要人教導並相信的事,那我們的教父、使徒之人,為抵擋一切異端、尤其是亞流派異端,如同設立一道真理的屏障,藉以堵塞一切瘟疫教義的入口,被聖靈充滿、按大公的道理所確立的事,如今竟被那些沉迷於亞流污點之口號的人,費盡極大氣力(且非無重大努力)地竭力除去呢?除非是要他們捏造神的兒子是可變的、可改的,彷彿祂並非由父自己的本質所構成:
For what cause, what reason existed, that what had been handed down to all the Churches to be taught and to be believed, and what our Fathers, the apostolic men, against all heresies and especially the Arian—as if a kind of barrier of truth, by which they might block every access of pestilent doctrine—being filled with the Holy Spirit, established by catholic reason, is now being labored to be removed (not without great effort) by those who are now addicted to the slogan of the Arian taint, except that they might fabricate that the Son of God is mutable and changeable, as having subsisted not from the Father's own substance:
6:71
cui et initium ex tempore, et ortum ex nihilo, nomen ex altero, ut semper docue runt (propter quod et sæpe damnati 508 sunt), nunc jam libere et secure incunctanterque Ecclesiis tradere et insinuare possint? CAPUT II. Videtis ergo omnia eos in tractatu ipsorum, non evangelica fide, sed subdola malignitate ad seducen dos simplices quosque posuisse. Non jam tam su spectum quam manifestum omnibus esse debet ita eos Deum de Deo posuisse, ut Arius tradere sole bat, ut ex Deo factus sit, non ex Deo natus. Qui si natus est, unius substantiae est: si factus est, verus Filius non est, et si verus Filius non est, nec verus Deus est.
使祂有時間中的開端、出於虛無的起源、來自他者的名稱—正如他們一向所教導的(因此他們也屢次被定罪)—如今竟可自由、安穩、毫不遲疑地傳給眾教會並暗中灌輸呢?第二章。所以你看見,他們在自己的論著中所陳述的一切,並非出於福音的信德,而是出於狡詐的惡意,為要引誘任何單純的人。如今這事眾人都當看為不只是可疑,而是顯然的:他們陳述「神出於神」,正如亞流慣常所傳的那樣—即祂是由神所造,而非由神所生。但祂若是被生的,就是同一本質的;祂若是被造的,就不是真正的兒子;祂若不是真正的兒子,就也不是真神。
so that to him there is a beginning from time, and an origin from nothing, and a name from another—as they have always taught (on account of which they have also been often condemned)—they may now freely and securely and without hesitation be able to hand it down and insinuate it to the Churches? CHAPTER II. You see therefore that they have set down everything in their treatise, not by evangelical faith, but by crafty malice, to seduce any simple folk. It ought now to be not so much suspected as manifest to all that they have so set down 'God of God' as Arius was wont to hand down—that he was made from God, not born from God. But if he is born, he is of one substance; if he is made, he is not the true Son; and if he is not the true Son, neither is he true God.
6:72
Aut si verus Deus est et de Patre non est, duo sum habentes singuli et voluntates proprias, et imperia diversa. Vel si concordia tantum et societate unum sunt, non tamen et substantia, verus, ut jam dixi, Deus non est: et sic erit Deus ut Moyses Pha noni (Exod. VII, 1) : potestate, non genere. Filius quoque ita credendus erit, ut per Isaiam populo di ctum est: Filios genui et exaltavi (Isai. i, 2), et ali hi : Dii estis, et filii Altissimi omnes (Psal. LXXXI, 6). Sed ut primoge litus ita habebitur, quomodo et Israel a Deo primogenitus filius appellatus est (Eud. IV, 2i). Nec non et primogenitus totius creaturae (Col.
再者,祂若是真神而不出於父,那麼就有兩位,各有自己的意志和不同的統治權。或者他們若只是藉著和諧與交往才是合一的,而非在本質上合一,那麼祂,正如我已說過的,就不是真神:這樣祂之為神,就如摩西之於法老一般(出埃及記七章1節)—是憑權能,而非憑本性。聖子也必須照神藉以賽亞對百姓所說的那樣去信:「我養育兒女,使他們高升」(以賽亞書一章2節),又在別處說:「你們是神,都是至高者的兒子」(詩篇八十二篇6節)。但祂被算為長子,也只像以色列被神稱為長子那樣(出埃及記四章22節)。又同樣是一切受造之物中的首生者(歌羅西書
Or if he is true God and is not of the Father, then there are two who each have their own wills and diverse dominions. Or if they are one only by concord and fellowship, but not also in substance, then he is not, as I have already said, true God: and thus he will be God as Moses was to Pharaoh (Exodus 7:1)—by power, not by nature. The Son too will have to be believed in the way that it was said to the people through Isaiah: 'I have begotten sons and exalted them' (Isaiah 1:2), and elsewhere: 'Ye are gods, and all of you sons of the Most High' (Psalm 82:6). But he will be reckoned firstborn only in the manner that Israel too was called by God a firstborn son (Exodus 4:22). And likewise the firstborn of all creation (Colossians