← All books · Latin Fathers › Consolation of Philosophy
Boethius
Consolation of Philosophy 2
Latin original · 41 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss
2:1
Post haec paulisper obticuit atque ubi attentionem meam modesta taciturnitate collegit, sic exorsa est: Si penitus aegritudinis tuae causas habitumque cognovi, fortunae prioris affectu desiderioque tabescis. Ea tantum animi tui sicuti tu tibi fingis mutata peruertit. Intellego multiformes illius prodigii fucos et eo usque cum his quos eludere nititur blandissimam familiaritatem, dum intolerabili dolore confundat quos insperata reliquerit. Cuius si naturam mores ac meritum reminiscare, nec habuisse te in ea pulchrum aliquid nec amisisse cognosces, sed ut arbitror haud multum tibi haec in memoriam reuocare laborauerim. Solebas enim praesentem quoque blandientemque uirilibus incessere uerbis eamque de nostro adyto prolatis insectabare sententiis.
After this she fell silent for a while, and when by her modest reticence she had gathered my attention, she thus began: 'If I have fully understood the causes and condition of your sickness, you are wasting away with longing and desire for your former fortune. It is the change of her — such as you yourself imagine — that has overthrown your mind. I understand the many-shaped disguises of that monster, and how she practices the most beguiling intimacy with those whom she strives to deceive, until she confounds with unbearable grief those whom she has unexpectedly forsaken. If you recall her nature, her ways, and her worth, you will recognize that you neither possessed in her anything beautiful nor lost anything; but, as I think, I shall hardly need to labor to recall these things to your memory. For you used to assail her even when present and fawning with manly words, and to pursue her with sentiments drawn from our own sanctuary.
說完這話,她沉默了片刻,待她以謙和的緘默集中了我的注意,便如此開言:「我若已完全明白你疾病的緣由與狀況,你正因渴慕、思念昔日的命運而憔悴消瘦。乃是她的變遷——正如你自己所想像的——傾覆了你的心。我深知那怪物千變萬化的偽裝,知道她如何對她竭力欺哄的人施行最迷人的親暱,直到她以難以承受的悲傷困住那些被她出其不意撇棄之人。你若記起她的本性、她的習性、她的價值,便會認清你在她身上既不曾擁有任何美好之物,也未曾失去甚麼;但我想,我幾乎無須費力使你重憶這些。因為從前即使她在你面前獻媚,你也以剛毅之言斥責她,並以從我們聖所引出的格言追討她。
2:2
Verum omnis subita mutatio rerum non sine quodam quasi fluctu contingit animorum; sic factum est ut tu quoque paulisper a tua tranquillitate descisceres. Sed tempus est haurire te aliquid ac degustare molle atque iucundum quod ad interiora transmissum ualidioribus haustibus uiam fecerit. Adsit igitur Rhetoricae suadela dulcedinis quae tum tantum recto calle procedit, cum nostra instituta non deserit cumque hac Musica laris nostri uernacula nunc leuiores nunc grauiores modos succinat. Quid est igitur o homo quod te in maestitiam luctumque deiecit? Nouum, credo, aliquid inusitatumque uidisti. Tu fortunam putas erga te esse mutatam; erras. Hi semper eius mores sunt ista natura. Seruauit circa te propriam potius in ipsa sui mutabilitate constantiam. Talis erat cum blandiebatur, cum tibi falsae inlecebris felicitatis alluderet.
But every sudden change of circumstances comes about not without a kind of tossing, as it were, of the spirit; thus it happened that you too fell away for a while from your tranquillity. But it is time for you to drink and taste something soft and pleasant, which, passed to your inner parts, may make a way for stronger draughts. Let there be present, then, the persuasion of Rhetoric's sweetness, which proceeds aright on its track only so long as it does not desert our precepts, and along with which let Music, the home-bred maid of our household, sing now lighter, now graver measures. What is it then, O man, that has cast you down into sorrow and lamentation? Something new, I suppose, something unusual, you have seen. You think Fortune has changed toward you; you err. These are ever her ways, this her nature. She has kept toward you rather her own constancy in her very mutability. Such was she when she fawned, when she played upon you with the enticements of false felicity.
然而,境遇的每一次驟變,無不伴隨心靈某種似乎的翻騰;因此你也暫時離開了你的安寧。但如今正是你飲嘗某些柔和悅人之物的時候,它傳入你內裡,便能為更強的飲劑開路。那麼,就讓修辭那甜美的勸服臨在吧——惟有它不背離我們的法則時,才在其路上正確前行;又讓音樂,我們家中土生的婢女,伴隨著它,時而唱輕快、時而唱莊重的調子。那麼人哪,是甚麼使你陷入憂愁哀傷?我想,你看見了某種新奇罕有之事。你以為命運待你變了;你錯了。這向來是她的習性,這是她的本性。她對你所保持的,反倒是她在自己變幻無常中的那份恆常。當她從前獻媚、以虛假幸福的誘惑戲弄你時,她也正是這樣。
2:3
Deprehendisti caeci numinis ambiguos uultus. Quae sese adhuc uelat aliis, tota tibi prorsus innotuit. Si probas, utere moribus; ne queraris. Si perfidiam perhorrescis, sperne atque abice perniciosa ludentem. Nam quae nunc tibi est tanti causa maeroris, haec eadem tranquillitas esse debuisset. Reliquit enim te quam non relicturam nemo umquam poterit esse securus. An uero tu pretiosam aestimas abituram felicitatem? Et cara tibi est fortuna praesens nec manendi fida et cum discesserit adlatura maerorem. Quod si nec ex arbitrio retineri potest et calamitosos fugiens facit, quid est aliud fugax quam futurae quoddam calamitatis indicium? Neque enim quod ante oculos situm est, suffecerit intueri; rerum exitus prudentia metitur eademque in alterutro mutabilitas nec formidandas fortunae minas nec exoptandas facit esse blanditias.
You have caught sight of the ambiguous countenance of the blind divinity. She who still veils herself to others has wholly disclosed herself to you. If you approve, use her ways; do not complain. If you shudder at her treachery, scorn and cast off her who plays so destructively. For that which is now to you so great a cause of grief, this same thing ought to have been your peace. For she has forsaken you, of whom no one can ever be secure that she will not forsake him. Or do you indeed reckon precious a felicity that is bound to depart? And is present fortune dear to you, who is neither faithful in remaining and, when she has departed, will bring grief? But if she cannot even be retained at will, and in fleeing makes men wretched, what else is a fleeting thing but a kind of token of calamity to come? For it will not suffice to gaze on what is set before the eyes; prudence measures the outcomes of things, and that same mutability in either direction makes the threats of Fortune neither to be feared nor her flatteries to be desired.
你已瞥見那盲目神祇曖昧的面容。她對別人仍遮掩自己,對你卻已全然顯露。你若認可,就接受她的習性,不要抱怨。你若對她的詭詐戰慄,就藐視並拋棄這玩弄人於毀滅之中的她。因為如今對你是如此大悲傷之緣由的,這同一件事本當是你的平安。因為她已撇棄了你,而論到她,無人能確保她永不撇棄。難道你竟看那勢必要離去的幸福為寶貴嗎?那現今的命運於你竟是親愛的嗎?她既不忠於停留,離去時又要帶來悲傷。然而她若連憑意願也留不住,且在逃離時使人悲慘,那麼一個轉瞬即逝之物,豈不過是將臨之災禍的一種徵兆?因為僅僅注視眼前之物是不夠的;明智乃衡量萬事的結局,而那同一份兩向的變幻無常,使命運的威嚇不足懼怕,她的諂媚也不足渴慕。
2:4
Postremo aequo animo toleres oportet quidquid intra fortunae aream geritur, cum semel iugo eius colla submiseris. Quod si manendi abeundique scribere legem uelis ei quam tu tibi dominam sponte legisti, nonne iniurius fueris et inpatientia sortem exacerbes quam permutare non possis? Si uentis uela committeres, non quo uoluntas peteret sed quo flatus impellerent, promoueres; si aruis semina crederes, feraces inter se annos sterilesque pensares. Fortunae te regendum dedisti; dominae moribus oportet obtemperes. Tu uero uoluentis rotae impetum retinere conaris? .At, omnium mortalium stolidissime, si manere incipit, fors esse desistit. Haec cum superba uerterit uices dextra Et aestuantis more fertur Euripi, Dudum tremendos saeua proterit reges Humilemque uicti subleuat fallax uultum.
Lastly, you ought to endure with an even mind whatever is enacted within Fortune's arena, once you have once submitted your neck to her yoke. But if you should wish to prescribe a law of staying and departing to her whom you have of your own accord chosen as your mistress, would you not be unjust, and by impatience embitter a lot which you cannot alter? If you committed your sails to the winds, you would advance not where your will sought but where the gusts drove; if you entrusted seeds to the fields, you would balance fruitful years against barren. You have given yourself to be ruled by Fortune; you must obey your mistress's ways. Do you then try to stay the onrush of the whirling wheel? But, most foolish of all mortals, if she begins to stay, she ceases to be Chance. With proud right hand she has reversed the turns and is borne along like the surging Euripus; cruelly she tramples down kings once dreaded, and deceitfully lifts up the humble face of the vanquished.
末了,你既已一次將頸項屈服於命運的軛下,就當以平靜的心忍受凡在她競技場中所演出的一切。但你若要為你親自選作主母的她規定停留與離去的律法,豈不顯為不義,並以急躁激怒那你無法更改的命運麼?你若把船帆交付於風,前進的方向便非你意願所求,乃是陣風所驅;你若把種子託付田地,便要以豐年與荒年互相權衡。你既已將自己交給命運管轄,就當順服你主母的習性。難道你還想攔住那旋轉之輪的奔湧麼?但是,眾人中最愚的人哪,她若開始停留,就不再是「機運」了。她以高傲的右手翻轉了局勢,如奔騰的尤里普斯海峽般被沖捲;她殘暴地踐踏昔日令人畏懼的君王,又詭詐地高舉那戰敗者卑微的面容。
2:5
Non illa miseros audit aut curat fletus Vltroque gemitus dura quos fecit ridet. Sic illa ludit, sic suas probat uires Magnumque suis demonstrat 1 ostentum, si quis Visatur una stratus ac felix hora. Vellem autem pauca tecum fortunae ipsius uerbis agitare. Tu igitur an ius postulet, animaduerte. 'Quid tu homo ream me cotidianis agis querelis? Quam tibi fecimus iniuriam? Quae tua tibi detraximus bona? Quouis iudice de opum dignitatumque mecum possessione contende. Et si cuiusquam mortalium proprium quid horum esse monstraueris, ego iam tua fuisse quae repetis, sponte concedam. Cum te matris utero natura produxit, nudum rebus omnibus inopemque suscepi, meis opibus foui et quod te nunc inpatientem nostri facit, fauore prona indulgentia educaui, omnium quae mei iuris sunt affluentia et splendore circumdedi. Nunc milli retrahere manum libet.
She heeds not the wretched, nor cares for their weeping, and unfeelingly laughs at the groans she herself has caused. Thus she plays, thus she proves her powers, and shows her followers a great prodigy, if one is seen in a single hour both laid low and fortunate. But I should like to discuss a few things with you in the very words of Fortune herself. Mark, therefore, whether she demands what is just. 'Why, O man, do you press me with daily complaints, making me the accused? What injury have we done you? What goods of yours have we taken from you? Before any judge you please, contend with me over the possession of riches and dignities. And if you can show that any of these is the property of any mortal, I will at once freely grant that those things you reclaim were yours. When nature brought you forth from your mother's womb, I received you naked and destitute of all things, nourished you with my resources, and — what now makes you impatient of me — reared you with favor, partial in my indulgence, and surrounded you with the affluence and splendor of all that is within my right. Now it pleases me to draw back my hand.
她不聽悲慘之人的哀求,也不顧念他們的哭泣,反而冷酷地嗤笑她自己所造成的呻吟。她如此玩耍,如此誇示她的能力,向她的隨從顯出一大奇景:若有人在同一時辰內既被擊倒、又得幸福。但我願以命運自己的言語與你討論幾件事。所以你要留意,看她所求的是否合乎公義。「人哪,你為何天天以怨言相逼,把我當作被告?我們向你行了甚麼不義?我們從你奪去了你哪樣的財物?你儘可在任何你所願的審判官面前,與我爭辯財富與尊榮的歸屬。你若能指明這些之中有任何一樣是某個必死之人的產業,我便立即甘願承認你所索回之物原是你的。當本性使你從母腹生出時,我接過你這赤身、一無所有的人,以我的資財養育你,又——這正是如今使你對我不耐的——以偏私的縱容、恩待養大你,並以凡屬我權柄之內的豐裕榮華環繞你。如今我樂意收回我的手。
2:6
Habes gratiam uelut usus alienis, non habes ius querelae tamquam prorsus tua perdideris. Quid igitur ingemiscis? Nulla tibi a nobis est allata uiolentia. Opes honores ceteraque talium mei sunt iuris. Dominam famulae cognoscunt j mecum ueniunt, me abeunte discedunt. Audacter adfirmem, si tua forent quae amissa conquerens nullo modo perdidisses. An ego sola meum ius exercere prohibebor? Licet caelo proferre lucidos dies eosdemque tenebrosis noctibus condere. Licet anno terrae uultum nunc floribus frugibusque redimire, nunc nimbis frigoribusque confundere. Ius est mari nunc strato aequore blandiri, nunc procellis ac fluctibus iuborrescere. Nos ad constantiam nostris moribus alienam inexpleta hominum cupiditas alligabit?
You owe me gratitude, as one who has used another's goods; you have no right of complaint, as if you had utterly lost what was your own. Why then do you groan? No violence has been done you by us. Wealth, honors, and the rest of such things are within my right. They acknowledge me as their mistress, the maidservants; with me they come, when I depart they go. Boldly I would affirm: if those things were yours, whose loss you bewail, you could in no way have lost them. Or shall I alone be forbidden to exercise my right? It is lawful for the sky to bring forth bright days and to hide those same in dark nights. It is lawful for the year now to crown the face of the earth with flowers and fruits, now to confound it with storms and frosts. It is the sea's right now to flatter with a smooth surface, now to bristle with squalls and waves. Shall men's insatiable greed bind me to a constancy alien to my ways?
你既使用了別人之物,便當向我感恩;你卻無權抱怨,彷彿失去了自己原有的東西。那麼你為何呻吟?我們並未向你施甚麼暴力。財富、尊榮以及其餘這類之物,都在我的權柄之內。它們,這些婢女,承認我為主母;與我同來,我離去時它們也離去。我可大膽斷言:那些你哀哭其喪失之物,若原是你的,你便絕不可能失去。難道惟獨我要被禁止行使我的權利麼?天空既可帶來明亮的白晝,又可把同樣的白晝藏在黑夜裡。年歲既可時而以花果為大地的面容戴冠,又可時而以風暴霜寒攪亂它。海洋既有權時而以平靜的水面諂媚,又有權時而以狂風巨浪聳立。難道人那無饜的貪婪,要把我捆鎖於一種與我習性相異的恆常麼?
2:7
Haec nostra uis est, hunc continuum ludum ludimus; rotam uolubili orbe uersamus, infima summis summa infimis mutare gaudemus. Ascende si placet, sed ea lege ne utique 1 cum Iudicia mei ratio poscet, descendere iniuriam putes. An tu mores ignorabas meos? Nesciebas Croesum regem Lydorum Cyro paulo ante formidabilem mox deinde miserandum rogi flammis traditum misso caelitus imbre defensum? Num te praeterit Paulum Persi regis a se capti calamitatibus pias inpendisse lacrimas? Quid tragoediarum clamor aliud deflet nisi indiscreto ictu fortunam felicia regna uertentem? Nonne adulescentulus δοιοὺσ πίθουσ τὸν μὲν ἕνα κακῶν τὸν δ' ἕτερον ἐάων in Iouis limine iacere didicisti? Quid si liberius de bonorum parte sumpsisti? Quid si a te non tota discessi?
This is our power, this is the continuous game we play: we turn the wheel in its rolling orbit, we delight to change the lowest to the highest, the highest to the lowest. Climb up, if you please, but on this condition: that you do not think it an injury to descend whenever the principle of my plan demands it. Or were you ignorant of my ways? Did you not know that Croesus, king of the Lydians, but lately formidable to Cyrus, was soon thereafter pitiable, handed over to the flames of the pyre, yet defended by a rain sent from heaven? Does it escape you that Aemilius Paulus shed pious tears over the calamities of Perseus, king of the Persians, captured by him? What else does the outcry of tragedies bewail but Fortune overturning happy kingdoms with an undiscriminating blow? Did you not learn as a young lad that 'two jars, the one of evils, the other of blessings' lie at the threshold of Jove (Homer)? What if you have taken more freely of the share of good things? What if I have not wholly departed from you?
這就是我們的權能,這就是我們所玩的無休止的遊戲:我們在滾動的軌道中轉動巨輪,我們喜歡把至卑的變為至高、把至高的變為至卑。你若願意就攀登吧,但有此一條:每逢我計畫的原則要求時,你不可把下降看作不義。難道你竟不知我的習性?難道你不知呂底亞王克羅伊索斯,方才還令居魯士畏懼,轉眼便淪為可憐,被交給火葬堆的烈焰,卻又被天降之雨所拯救?難道你忘了埃米利烏斯·保盧斯,曾為他所擒的波斯王珀爾修斯之災難而灑下虔誠的淚?悲劇的呼喊所哀悼的,豈不正是命運以無分別的一擊傾覆幸福王國麼?你年少時豈不曾學過:「兩個甕,一個盛禍、一個盛福」擱在宙斯的門檻上(荷馬語)?倘若你較放縱地取了那美善之分呢?倘若我並未全然離開你呢?
2:8
Quid si haec ipsa mei mutabilitas iusta tibi causa est sperandi meliora? tamen ne animo contabescas et intra commune omnibus regnum Iocatus proprio uiuere iure desideres. Si quantas rapidis flatibus incitus Pontus uersat barenas Aut quot stelliferis edita noctibus Caelo sidera fulgent Tantas fundat opes nec retrahat manum Pleno copia cornu. Humanum miseras haud ideo genus Cesset flere querellas. Quamuis uota libens excipiat deus Multi prodigus auri Et claris auidos ornet honoribus, Nil iam parta uidentur, Sed quaesita uorans saeua rapacitas Altos 1 pandit hiatus. Quae iam praecipitem frena cupidinem Certo fine retentent, Largis cum potius muneribus fluens Sitis ardescit habendi? Numquam diues agit qui trepidus gemens Sese credit egentem.
What if this very mutability of mine is for you a just cause for hoping better things? Yet do not waste away in spirit, and, placed within the realm common to all, do not desire to live by your own private right.' If Plenty, with full horn, should pour out as many riches and not draw back her hand as the sea, stirred by rushing blasts, rolls grains of sand, or as many stars as shine forth in the star-bearing nights of the sky — not for that would the human race cease to weep its wretched complaints. Though God should freely grant their prayers, lavish of much gold, and deck the greedy with bright honors, what is gained seems as nothing, but savage rapacity, devouring what it has sought, opens wide its gaping maws. What reins shall hold back headlong desire within a fixed bound, when, the more it flows with lavish gifts, the more the thirst for having burns? Never is he rich who, trembling and groaning, believes himself to be in want.
倘若我這變幻無常本身,對你正是盼望更美之事的正當緣由呢?只是你不要心靈憔悴,既已置身於眾人共有的領域,就不要妄想憑自己私有的權利而活。」即或豐裕之神以滿溢的角傾倒財富、不收回她的手,多如那被疾風攪動之海所翻捲的沙粒,或多如在星辰滿佈之夜空中閃耀的繁星——縱然如此,人類也不會止息其悲慘的怨歎。即或神甘願應允他們的祈求,慷慨賜下許多金子,又以光彩的尊榮裝飾貪婪之人,已得之物在他看來仍如無物,那兇暴的貪求吞噬了所追求的,反更張開它那貪婪的大口。當欲望流溢於慷慨的禮物越多、占有之渴越燒得熾烈時,甚麼韁繩能把那衝動的欲望約束在固定的界限內?凡顫抖呻吟、自以為窮乏的人,永不算為富足。
2:9
His igitur si pro se tecum fortuna loqueretur, quid profecto contra hisceres non haberes, aut si quid est quo querelam tuam iure tuearis, proferas oportet. Dabimus dicendi locum. Tum ego: Speciosa quidem ista sunt, inquam, oblitaque Rhetoricae ac Musicae melle dulcedinis; tum tantum, cum audiuntur, oblectant. Sed miseris malorum altior sensus est. Itaque cum haec auribus insonare desierint, insitus animum maeror praegrauat. Et illa: Ita est, inquit. Haec enim nondum morbi tui remedia sed adhuc contumacis aduersum curationem doloris fomenta quaedam sunt. Nam quae in profundum sese penetrant, cum tempestiuum fuerit admouebo. Verumtamen ne te existimari miserum uelis, an numerum modumque tuae felicitatis oblitus es?
If, then, Fortune should plead her case with you in these terms, you would have nothing whatever to murmur in reply; or if you have anything by which you may justly defend your complaint, you ought to bring it forth. We shall give you opportunity to speak.' Then I: 'Specious indeed are these things,' I said, 'smeared over with the honey of Rhetoric's and Music's sweetness; they delight only so long as they are heard. But for the wretched there is a deeper sense of their evils. Therefore, when these things have ceased to sound in the ears, the grief implanted weighs down the mind.' And she: 'It is so,' she said. 'For these are not yet remedies for your sickness, but as yet a kind of fomentation for a grief still stubborn against its cure. For those things which penetrate into the depths I shall apply when it is opportune. Nevertheless, that you may not wish to be reckoned wretched — have you forgotten the number and measure of your felicity?
那麼,命運若以這些話與你申辯她的理由,你便絕無任何可回嘴抱怨之處;或者你若有任何可正當地為你的怨言辯護之據,就當提出來。我們必給你說話的機會。」於是我說:「這些話固然動聽,」我說,「塗抹著修辭與音樂之甜蜜的蜜糖;惟有當人聽見時才令人歡悅。但對悲慘之人,他們對自身禍患有更深的感受。因此,當這些話止息於耳際時,那植入的悲傷便壓沉了心靈。」她說:「正是如此,」她說。「因為這些尚非醫治你疾病的良藥,乃是對那仍頑抗醫治之悲傷的某種熱敷。至於那能深入內裡的,待時機相宜時我必施用。然而,免得你願被算為悲慘之人——你竟忘了你福分的數目與份量麼?
2:10
Taceo quod desolatum parente summorum te uirorum cura suscepit delectusque in affiniatem principum ciuitatis, quod pretiosissimum propinquitatis genus est, prius carus quam proximus esse coepisti. Quis non te felicissimum cum tanto splendore socerorum, cum coniugis pudore, cum masculae quoque prolis opportunitate praedicauit? Praetereo, libet enim praeterire communia, sumptas in adulescentia negatas senibus dignitates; ad singularem felicitate tuae cumulum uenire delectat.
I pass over the fact that, bereft of your father, you were taken up by the care of men of the highest rank, and, chosen into the kinship of the city's princes — which is the most precious kind of relationship — you began to be dear before you were close. Who did not proclaim you most fortunate, with so great a splendor of fathers-in-law, with the chastity of your wife, and with the timely blessing of male offspring as well? I omit — for it pleases me to omit what is common — the dignities granted you in youth that are denied to old men; it delights me to come to the singular crown of your felicity.
我略過這事不提:你喪失了父親,卻被那些最高位之人的眷顧所接納,又被選入城中王公的姻親——這乃是最寶貴的親屬關係——以致你尚未成為近親,就已蒙人珍愛。誰不稱你為至有福之人,既有如此榮耀的諸位岳丈、有你妻子的貞潔,又有男嗣適時的福分?我略過——因我樂意略過尋常之事——你少年時所蒙、年老之人卻被拒絕的尊榮;我樂意說到你福分那獨特的冠冕。
2:11
Si quis rerum mortalium fructus ullum beatitudinis pondus habet, poteritne illius memoria lucis quantalibet ingruentium malorum mole deleri, cum duos pariter consules liberos tuos domo prouehi sub frequentia patrum, sub plebis alacritate uidisti, cum eisdem in curia curules in-sidentibus tu regiae laudis orator ingenii gloriam facundiaeque meruisti, cum in circo duorum medius consulum circumfusae multitudinis expectationem triumphali largitione satiasti? Dedisti ut opinor uerba fortunae, dum te illa demulcet, dum te ut delicias suas fouet. Munus quod nulli umquam priuato commodauerat abstulisti. Visne igitur cum fortuna calculum ponere? Nunc te primum liuenti oculo praestrinxit. Si numerum modumque laetorum tristiumue consideres, adhuc te felicem negare non possis.
If any fruit of mortal things has any weight of blessedness, can the memory of that light be blotted out by however great a mass of crowding evils — when you saw your two sons, both consuls together, borne forth from your home amid a throng of senators and the eager joy of the people; when, as those same sons sat in their curule chairs in the senate-house, you, the orator of royal praise, earned the glory of genius and eloquence; when in the circus, seated between the two consuls, you satisfied the expectation of the surrounding multitude with a triumphal largesse? You gave Fortune fair words, I think, while she caressed you, while she cherished you as her darling. You carried off a gift she had never before bestowed on any private man. Do you wish, then, to cast up the reckoning with Fortune? Now for the first time she has grazed you with an envious eye. If you consider the number and measure of your joys and sorrows, you cannot yet deny that you are fortunate.
凡有福之物,必有甚麼必死之物的果實能具其份量的話,那光景的記憶,豈能被何等龐大紛至沓來的禍患所抹去——當你看見你那兩個兒子,同時並列為執政官,從你家中被擁出,在元老的群集與民眾踴躍的歡喜之中;當這同樣的兩個兒子坐在元老院的執政官座位上時,你這頌揚王者的演說家,贏得了天才與口才的榮耀;當你在競技場中坐在兩位執政官之間,以凱旋的賞賜滿足了環繞之眾民的期待?我想,當她撫慰你、如珍寵般疼愛你時,你曾向命運說過好話。你取得了她從未賜給任何平民之人的禮物。那麼你願與命運算總帳麼?如今她才頭一次以嫉妒的眼掠過你。你若衡量你喜樂與憂愁的數目與份量,便仍不能否認你是有福的。
2:12
Quod si idcirco te fortunatum esse non aestimas, quoniam quae tunc laeta uidebantur abierunt, non est quod te miserum putes, quoniam quae nunc creduntur maesta praetereunt. An tu in hanc uitae scaenam nunc primum subitus hospesque uenisti? VI Iamne humanis rebus inesse constantiam reris, cum ipsum saepe hominem uelox hora dissoluat? Nam etsi rara est fortuitis manendi fides, ultimus tamen uitae dies mors quaedam fortunae est etiam manentis. Quid igitur referre putas, tune illam moriendo deseras an te illa fugiendo? Cum polo Phoebus roseis quadrigis Lucem spargere coeperit, Pallet albentes hebetata uultus Flammis stella prementibus. Cum nemus flatu Zephyri tepentis Vernis inrubuit rosis, Spiret insanum nebulosus Auster Iam spinis abeat decus. Saepe tranquillo radiat sereno Immotis mare fluctibus, Saepe feruentes Aquilo procella?
But if you do not on that account reckon yourself fortunate, because the things that then seemed glad have departed, there is no reason for you to think yourself wretched, since the things that now are believed sad are passing away. Or have you now for the first time come, a sudden stranger and guest, upon this stage of life? Do you suppose there is any constancy in human affairs, when a swift hour often dissolves man himself? For although there is little faith in chance things' remaining, yet the last day of life is a kind of death even of an enduring fortune. What difference, then, do you think it makes — whether you forsake her by dying, or she forsakes you by fleeing? When Phoebus with rosy four-horse chariot begins to scatter light across the pole, the star, dulled by the pressing flames, grows pale, its whitening face. When the grove, under the breath of the warm Zephyr, blushes red with spring roses, let the cloudy south wind blow madly — and now the splendor will pass from the thorns. Often the sea radiates in calm serenity with motionless waves, often the North Wind with its storm
但你若不因此就算自己有福,乃因那時看似可喜之物已經離去,那麼你也沒有理由自以為悲慘,因為如今所信以為憂愁之物正在過去。難道你如今才頭一次,作為一個突來的陌生人與賓客,登上這人生的舞臺麼?你以為人間萬事有甚麼恆常麼?既然一個倏忽的時辰常將人本身消解。因為偶然之物縱然在停留上少有可信,然而生命的末日,對一個持久的命運而言,也算是一種死亡。那麼你以為有甚麼分別——是你藉死亡撇棄她,還是她藉逃離撇棄你?當太陽以玫瑰色的四馬車開始向蒼穹播撒光輝時,那星辰被逼近的火焰所黯淡,便失了光彩,面容轉白。當叢林在溫暖西風的吹拂下、因春日玫瑰而泛紅時,且讓那多雲的南風瘋狂吹襲——轉眼間那荊棘的華美便要消逝。海洋常在寧靜的晴空中以靜止的波瀾閃耀,北風卻常以其風暴
2:13
Verso concitat aequore. Rara si constat sua forma mundo, Si tantas uariat uices, Crede fortunis hominum caducis, Bonis crede fugacibus. Constat aeterna positumque lege est Vt constet genitum nihil. Tum ego: Vera, inquam, commemoras, o uirtutum omnium nutrix, nec infitiari possum prosperitatis meae uelocissimum cursum. Sed hoc est quod recolentem uehementius coquit. Nam in omni aduersitate fortunae infelicissimum est genus infortunii fuisse felicem, Sed quod tu, inquit, falsae opinionis supplicium luas, id rebus iure imputare non possis. Nam si te hoc inane nomen fortuitae felicitatis mouet, quam pluribus maximisque abundes mecum reputes licet. Igitur si quod in omni fortunae tuae censu pretiosissimum possidebas, id tibi diuinitus iulaesum adhuc inuiolatumque seruatur, poterisne meliora quaeque retinens de infortunio iure causari?
stirs up the churning waters with overturned surface. If the world's own form rarely stands fast, if it varies with such great changes, then trust in the fleeting fortunes of men, trust in goods that flee away. It is settled, and laid down by eternal law, that nothing begotten shall stand fast. Then I: 'True,' I said, 'are the things you recall, O nurse of all the virtues, nor can I deny the most swift course of my prosperity. But this is what, in the recalling, scorches me more vehemently. For in every adversity of fortune, the most unhappy kind of misfortune is to have been happy.' 'But that you,' she said, 'should pay the penalty of false opinion — this you cannot justly charge to circumstances. For if this empty name of fortuitous felicity moves you, you may reckon with me how many and how great are the things in which you abound. Therefore, if that which in all the reckoning of your fortune you possessed as most precious is, by divine gift, still preserved to you unharmed and inviolate, can you, retaining the better things, justly plead misfortune?
以翻覆的水面攪起激盪的海濤。世界本身的形態既鮮少固定不變,既以如此巨大的更替而變化,那就且信靠人那易逝的命運、信靠那逃離的福樂吧。這已成定局,並由永恆的律所定下:凡受造之物,無一得以長存。於是我說:「你所追述的,眾德之乳母啊,乃是真實的,」我說,「我也不能否認我亨通的進程是何等迅速。但這正是在追憶中更猛烈地灼燒我的。因為在命運的一切逆境中,最不幸的厄運莫過於曾經幸福。」「但你,」她說,「竟為虛假見解付上代價——這你不能正當地歸咎於境遇。因為若這虛空的『偶然幸福』之名打動你,你便可與我算算,你所豐盛擁有之物是何等多、何等大。所以,倘若在你命運的一切清算中你所擁有最寶貴之物,藉著神聖的恩賜,至今仍完好無損、毫無玷污地為你存留,那麼你既保有更美之物,還能正當地以厄運為由抱怨麼?
2:14
Atqui uiget incolumis illud pretiosissimum generis humani decus Symmachus socer et quod uitae pretio non segnis emeres, uir totus ex sapientia uirtutibusque factus suarum securus tuis ingemiscit iniuriis. Viuit uxor ingenio modesta, pudicitia pudore praecellens et, ut omnes eius dotes breuiter includam, patri similis. Viuit inquam tibique tantum uitae huius exosa spiritum seruat quoque uno felicitatem minui tuam uel ipsa concesserim, tui desiderio lacrimis ac dolore tabescit. Quid dicam liberos consulares quorum iam, ut in id aetatis pueris, uel paterni uel auiti specimen elucet ingenii? Cum igitur praecipua sit mortalibus uitae cura retinendae, o te si tua bona cognoscas felicem, cui suppetunt etiam nunc quae uita nemo dubitat esse carior! Quare sicca iam lacrimas.
And yet there flourishes unharmed that most precious glory of the human race, Symmachus your father-in-law — and what you would not be slow to purchase at the price of life — a man wholly fashioned out of wisdom and virtues, who, secure for himself, groans over your injuries. Your wife lives, modest in disposition, surpassing in chastity and modesty, and — to include all her gifts briefly — like her father. She lives, I say, and, hating the breath of this life for your sake alone, she preserves it; and in this one thing, that her felicity is diminished, I would myself concede that yours too is lessened — she wastes away in tears and grief with longing for you. What shall I say of your sons of consular rank, in whom already, as in boys of that age, a likeness of either their father's or their grandfather's genius shines forth? Since, then, the chief care of mortals is to retain life, O you, if you would but recognize your goods, are fortunate, you to whom there are still left even now things which no one doubts are dearer than life! Wherefore now dry your tears.
然而,人類那最寶貴的榮耀至今仍完好興旺,就是你的岳丈敘瑪庫斯——你必不遲疑甘願以生命為代價來換取的——一位全然由智慧與德行所塑成之人,他雖為自己安穩無虞,卻為你所受的傷害而呻吟。你的妻子尚存,性情謙和,貞潔端莊出眾,並且——簡言之以包括她一切的稟賦——肖似她的父親。我說,她尚存,且惟獨為你的緣故厭惡這今生的氣息,卻仍保守著它;單在這一件事上,就是她的幸福減少了,我自己也願承認你的幸福亦因此減損——她因思念你而以淚水與悲傷憔悴消瘦。對於你那執政官身分的兒子們,我又能說甚麼呢?在他們身上,已如那年紀的男孩般,閃現著他們父親或祖父天才的形似。那麼,既然必死之人首要的掛念乃是保存生命,你啊,你若肯認清你的福分,便是有福的,因你至今仍存留著無人懷疑比生命更寶貴之物!因此如今擦乾你的眼淚吧。
2:15
Nondum est ad unum omnes exosa fortuna nec tibi nimium ualida tempestas incubuit, quando tenaces haerent ancorae quae nec praesentis solamen nec futuri spem temporis abesse patiantur. Et haereant, inquam, precor; illis namque manentibus, utcumque se res habeant, enatabimus. Sed quantum ornamentis nostris decesserit, uides. Et illa. Promouimus, inquit, aliquantum, si te nondum totius tuae sortis piget. Sed delicias tuas ferre non possum qui abesse aliquid tuae beatitudini tam luctuosus atque anxius conqueraris. Quis est enim tam conpositae felicitatis ut non aliqua ex parte cum status sui qualitate rixetur? Anxia enim res est humanorum condicio bonorum et quae uel numquam tota proueniat uel numquam perpetua subsistat.
Fortune has not yet hated all together to the last man, nor has too violent a tempest fallen upon you, since tenacious anchors hold fast, which suffer neither the solace of the present nor the hope of the future time to be wanting.' 'And let them hold fast, I pray,' I said; 'for while these remain, however matters may stand, we shall swim free. But you see how much has gone from our adornments.' And she: 'We have made,' she said, 'some little progress, if you are not yet wholly weary of your lot. But I cannot bear your daintiness, who so mournfully and anxiously complain that something is lacking to your blessedness. For who is there of so well-composed a felicity that he does not in some part quarrel with the quality of his own condition? For anxious is the condition of human goods, which either never comes wholly, or never remains perpetual.
命運尚未連同最後一人也一概憎惡,也未有過於兇暴的風暴臨到你,因為穩固的錨仍緊抓著,使現今的安慰與將來時光的盼望都不至缺失。」「但願它們緊抓著,我求你,」我說,「因為只要這些仍在,無論事情如何,我們總能游到岸上。然而你看,我們的妝飾已失去多少。」她說:「我們已稍有進展,」她說,「只要你尚未對你的命分全然厭倦。但我不能容忍你的嬌氣,你竟如此哀傷焦慮地抱怨你的福樂有所缺欠。試問有誰擁有如此圓滿的幸福,以致他在某一方面不與自己境況的品質爭執?因為人間之福的處境乃是叫人焦慮的,它若非從不曾全然臨到,便是從不曾長久存留。
2:16
Huic census exuberat, sed est pudori degener sanguis; hunc nobilitas notum facit, sed angustia rei familiaris inclusus esse mallet ignotus. Ille utroque circumfluus uitam caelibem deflet; ille nuptiis felix orbus liberis alieno censum nutrit heredi. Alius prole laetatus filii filiaeue delictis maestus inlacrimat. Idcirco nemo facile cum fortunae suae condicione concordat j inest enim singulis quod inexpertus ignoret, expertus exhorreat. Adde quod felicissimi cuiusque delicatissimus sensus est et nisi ad nutum cuncta suppetant, omnis aduersitatis insolens minimis quibusque prosternite; adeo perexigua sunt quae fortunatissimis beatitudinis summam detrahunt. Quam multos esse coniectas qui sese caelo proximos arbitrentur, si de fortunae tuae reliquiis pars eis minima contingat?
For one man wealth overflows, but degenerate blood is a shame to him; another nobility makes known, but, hemmed in by the narrowness of his household estate, he would rather be unknown. Another, abounding in both, bewails his celibate life; another, happy in marriage but childless, nurtures his estate for an alien heir. Another, gladdened with offspring, weeps in sorrow over the misdeeds of son or daughter. Therefore no one easily agrees with the condition of his own fortune; for there is in each something that the inexperienced does not know, but the experienced shudders at. Add that the sense of every most fortunate man is most delicate, and unless all things come at his nod, unaccustomed to any adversity, he is laid low by the very least things — so very trifling are the things that subtract the sum of blessedness from the most fortunate. How many do you suppose there are who would deem themselves next to heaven, if even the least part of the remnants of your fortune should fall to them?
因為這人財富滿溢,卻有卑賤的血統叫他羞愧;那人有貴族出身使他聞名,卻因家業的狹窘而寧願默默無聞。又有人兩者兼備,卻哀歎自己的獨身生活;另有人婚姻美滿卻無子,為了外人的後嗣養肥自己的家業。又有人雖以兒女為樂,卻為兒子或女兒的過犯憂傷哭泣。因此無人輕易與自己命運的處境相安;因為各人身上總有某物,未經歷的人不曉得,經歷過的人卻戰慄。再者,越是有福之人,感受越是嬌嫩,除非凡事都隨他心意而來,他既不慣於任何逆境,便被最微小之事擊倒——以致從最有福之人身上奪去福樂全部之物,竟是如此微不足道。你以為有多少人,若你命運的殘餘哪怕最小的一份臨到他們,便會自以為與天相鄰?
2:17
Hic ipse locus quem tu exilium uocas, incolentibus patria est; adeo nihil est miserum nisi cum putes contraque beata sors omnis est aequanimitate tolerantis. Quis est ille tam felix qui cum dederit inpatientiae manus, statum suum mutare non optet? Quam multis amaritudinibus humanae felicitatis dulcedo respersa est! Quae si etiam fruenti iucunda esse uideatur, tamen quo minus cum uelit abeat retineri non possit. Liquet igitur quam sit mortalium rerum misera beatitudo quae nec apud aequanimos perpetua perdurat necanxios tota delectat. Quid igitur o mortales extra petitis intra uos positam felicitatem? Error uos inscitiaque confundit. Ostendam breuiter tibi summae cardinem felicitatis. Estne aliquid tibi te ipso pretiosius? Nihil inquies. Igitur si tui compos fueris, possidebis quod nec tu amittere umquam uelis nec fortuna possit auferre.
This very place which you call exile is, to those who dwell in it, their homeland; so true is it that nothing is wretched unless you think it so, and that, conversely, every lot is blessed by the equanimity of him who bears it. Who is there so happy that, when he has surrendered to impatience, he does not wish to change his estate? With how many bitternesses is the sweetness of human felicity besprinkled! And even if it should seem pleasant to one enjoying it, yet it cannot be retained from departing whenever it will. Plain it is, then, how wretched is the blessedness of mortal things, which neither endures perpetually with the even-minded, nor wholly delights the anxious. Why then, O mortals, do you seek outside yourselves the felicity placed within you? Error and ignorance confound you. I will show you briefly the hinge of the highest felicity. Is there anything more precious to you than your own self? Nothing, you will say. Therefore, if you are master of yourself, you will possess what you would never wish to lose, nor could Fortune take away.
你所稱為放逐之地的這同一地方,對居於其中的人卻是故鄉;可見一事何其真切:凡事除非你以為悲慘,便無一悲慘;反過來說,每一命分都因承受者的泰然處之而成為有福。試問有誰如此幸福,以致他一旦向急躁屈服,便不渴望改變自己的境況?人間幸福的甘甜上,灑滿了何等多的苦澀!縱然它在享用者看來似乎悅人,卻也不能攔阻它隨意離去。可見必死之物的福樂何等悲慘,它既不在泰然之人身上長久存留,也不全然使焦慮之人歡喜。那麼必死的人哪,你們為何在身外尋求那置於你們裡面的幸福?謬誤與無知使你們困惑。我要簡略地向你指明至高幸福的樞紐。對你而言,有甚麼比你自己更寶貴麼?你必說,沒有。所以你若作了自己的主,便必擁有那你永不願失去、命運也奪不去之物。
2:18
Atque ut agnoscas in his fortuitis rebus beatitudinem constare non possessio collige. Si beatitudo est summum naturae bonum ratione degentis nec est summum bonum quod eripi ullo modo potest, quoniam praecellit id quod nequeat auferri, manifestum est quoniam 1 ad beatitudinem percipiendam fortunae instabilitas adspirare non possit. Ad haec quem caduca ista felicitas uenit uel scit eam uel nescit esse mutabilem. Si nescit, quaenam beata sors esse potest ignorantiae caecitate? Si scit, metuat necesse est, ne amittat quod amitti posse non dubitat; quare continuus timor non sinit esse felicem. An uel si amiserit, neglegendum putat? Sic quoque perexile bonum est quod aequo animo feratur amissum.
And that you may recognize that blessedness cannot consist in these fortuitous things, gather it thus. If blessedness is the highest good of a nature living by reason, and that is not the highest good which can in any way be snatched away — since that which cannot be taken away excels it — it is manifest that the instability of Fortune cannot aspire to attaining blessedness. Besides, the man to whom this transitory felicity comes either knows or knows not that it is mutable. If he knows not, what blessed lot can there be in the blindness of ignorance? If he knows, he must of necessity fear lest he lose what he does not doubt can be lost; wherefore a continual fear does not let him be happy. Or, even if he should lose it, does he think it a thing to be disregarded? Thus too it is a most paltry good which is borne with an even mind when lost.
為使你認清福樂不能繫於這些偶然之物,你可如此推論。倘若福樂乃是憑理性而活之本性的至高善,又倘若那能以任何方式被奪去之物便非至高善——因為那不能被奪去之物勝過它——那麼顯然命運的不穩定無從企及福樂的獲得。再者,這暫時幸福臨到之人,或知或不知它是變幻無常的。他若不知,那麼在無知的盲目中能有甚麼有福的命分?他若知道,便必然懼怕,惟恐失去那他確知可能失去之物;因此持續的懼怕使他不得幸福。或者縱然他失去了它,他竟以為這是可置之度外之事麼?那麼,那喪失時能以平靜的心承受之物,也不過是至為微末的善。
2:19
Et quoniam tu idem es cui persuasum atque insitum permultis demonstrationibus scio mentes hominum nullo modo esse mortales cumque clarum sit fortuitam felicitatem corporis morte finiri, dubitari nequit, si haec afferre beatitudinem potest, quin omne mortalium genus in miseriam mortis fine labatur. Quod si multos scimus beatitudinis fructum non morte solum uerum etiam doloribus suppliciisque quaesisse, quonam modo praesens facere beatos potest quae miseros transacta non efficit? Quisquis uolet perennem Cautus ponere sedem Stabilisque nec sonori Sterni flatibus Euri Et fluctibus minantem Curat spernere pontum, Montis cacumen alti, Bibulas uitet harenas. Illud proteruus Auster Totis uiribus urget, Hae pendulum solutae Pondus ferre recusant. Fugiens periculosam Sortem sedis amoenae Humili domum memento Certus figere saxo.
And since you are the same man to whom I know it is persuaded and implanted by very many demonstrations that the minds of men are in no way mortal, and since it is clear that fortuitous felicity is ended by the death of the body, it cannot be doubted that, if this can confer blessedness, the whole race of mortals slips into the wretchedness of death's end. But if we know that many have sought the fruit of blessedness not only by death but even by griefs and torments, in what way can that make men blessed in its presence which does not make them wretched when it is past? Whoever wishes to set, cautiously, a lasting seat, and, steadfast, neither to be laid low by the blasts of the resounding East Wind, and who cares to scorn the sea threatening with its waves — let him avoid the high mountain peak and the thirsty sands. The wanton South Wind presses the one with all its force; the others, loosened, refuse to bear the hanging weight. Fleeing the perilous lot of a pleasant site, remember, sure, to fix your house on a low rock.
你既是這同一個人,我知道你已被許許多多的論證所說服、銘刻在心:人的心靈絕非會死的;又既然明顯偶然的幸福因身體之死而告終,那就不容置疑:倘若這幸福能賜下福樂,整個必死之族便都滑入死亡終局的悲慘中。但我們若知道許多人曾不僅藉死亡、甚且藉憂傷與酷刑追求福樂的果實,那麼,那在它過去時不使人悲慘之物,又怎能在它臨在時使人有福?凡願謹慎地安立一持久的居所,並堅定不移,既不被那轟鳴之東風的吹襲擊倒,又願藐視那以波濤威嚇之海的人——讓他避開高山之巔與乾渴的沙地。那放縱的南風以全力逼壓高峰;沙地鬆散,承不住懸垂的重量。你既逃離悅人之地的危險命分,就要記得,務必把你的房子安在低處的磐石上。
2:20
Quamuis tonet ruinis Miscens aequora uentus, Tu conditus quieti Felix robore ualli Duces serenus aeuum Ridens aetheris iras. Sed quoniam rationum iam in te mearum fomenta descendunt, paulo ualidioribus utendum puto. Age enim si iam caduca et momentaria fortunae dona non essent, quid in eis est quod aut uestrum umquam fieri queat aut non perspectum consideratumque uilescat? Diuitiaene uel uestra uel sui natura pretiosae sunt? Quid earum potius, aurumne an uis congesta pecuniae? Atqui haec effundendo magis quam coaceruando melius nitent, si quidem auaritia semper odiosos, claros largitas facit. Quod si manere apud quemque non potest quod transfertur in alterum, tunc est pretiosa pecunia cum translata in alios largiendi usu desinit possideri. At eadem si apud unum quanta est ubique gentium congeratur, ceteros sui inopes fecerit.
Although the wind should thunder with ruins, mingling the waters, you, hidden in quiet, happy in the strength of your rampart, shall lead a serene life, laughing at the wraths of the upper air. But since the fomentations of my reasonings are now sinking into you, I think we must use somewhat stronger ones. Come then: even if the gifts of Fortune were not transitory and momentary, what is there in them that could ever become yours, or that, examined and considered, would not grow cheap? Are riches precious either by your nature or by their own? What of them rather — gold, or the heaped force of money? And yet these shine better by being poured out than by being hoarded, since indeed avarice ever makes men hated, but generosity makes them illustrious. But if that cannot remain with each man which is transferred to another, then money is precious only when, transferred to others by the practice of giving, it ceases to be possessed. But the same, if it be heaped up with one man, however much there is anywhere in the world, will have made all the rest destitute of it.
即或狂風轟然作響、釀成毀滅、攪混眾水,你卻隱藏在寧靜中,因壁壘的堅固而歡喜,必度安詳的歲月,譏笑那高空的忿怒。但既然我推理的熱敷如今正滲入你,我想我們須得用稍強些的了。那麼來吧:縱然命運的禮物並非暫時、瞬息的,其中又有甚麼能真成為你的,或是經過審視考量後不致變得卑賤的?財富之為寶貴,是憑你的本性,還是憑它們自己的本性?其中哪樣更甚——是黃金,還是堆積的金錢之力?然而這些藉傾倒散施,比藉囤積貯藏更顯光彩,因為貪婪向來使人遭恨,慷慨卻使人顯赫。但那轉給別人之物若不能存留於各人身上,那麼金錢惟有藉施與的作為轉給別人、不再被占有時,才是寶貴的。但這同樣的金錢若囤積在一人身上,無論世間何處有多少,都必使其餘眾人因此貧乏。
2:21
Et uox quidem tota pariter multorum replet auditum j uestrae uero diuitiae nisi comminutae in plures transire non possunt. Quod cum factum est, pauperes necesse est faciant quos relinquunt. O igitur angustas inopesque diuitias quas nec habere totas pluribus licet et ad quemlibet sine ceterorum paupertate non ueniunt! An gemmarum fulgor oculos trahit? Sed si quid est in hoc splendore praecipui, gemmarum est lux illa non hominum, quas quidem mirari homines uehementer admiror. Quid est enim carens animae motu atque compage quod animatae rationabilique naturae pulchrum esse iure uideatur? Quae tametsi conditoris opera suique distinctione postremae aliquid pulchritudinis trahunt, infra uestram tamen excellentiam conlocatae admirationem uestram nullo modo merebantur. An uos agrorum pulchritudo delectat? Quidni?
And a single voice indeed fills equally the hearing of many; but your riches cannot pass to several unless broken up into parts. And when that has been done, they must of necessity make poor those whom they leave. O therefore narrow and beggarly riches, which neither can several possess whole, nor come to any one man without the poverty of the rest! Or does the gleam of gems draw the eyes? But if there is anything outstanding in this splendor, that brightness is of the gems, not of men; and I greatly marvel that men admire these things. For what is there, lacking the motion and structure of a soul, that could justly seem beautiful to a soul-endowed and rational nature? These, although by the work of their Creator and their own distinction they draw some last bit of beauty, yet, placed below your excellence, in no way deserved your admiration. Or does the beauty of fields delight you? Why should it not?
一個聲音固然同等地充滿許多人的聽覺;你們的財富卻除非分裂成份,便不能傳給數人。而當這事一旦成就,它們便必然使它們所離棄之人貧窮。所以這財富何等狹窄、何等寒酸,既不能讓數人完整地擁有,又不能臨到任何一人而不使其餘的人貧困!抑或寶石的光澤吸引你的眼目?但這光彩中若有甚麼出眾之處,那光亮乃屬於寶石,並非屬於人;我大為詫異人竟如此熱切地讚嘆這些。試問,那缺乏靈魂之活動與構造之物,怎能在有靈、有理性的本性看來正當地顯為美麗?這些寶石縱然藉著其創造者的工作與自身的分別而帶有些許末等的美麗,然而它們既被置於你卓越之下,便絕不配得你的讚嘆。抑或田野的美麗使你歡喜?怎能不歡喜呢?
2:22
Est enim pulcherrimi operis pulchra portio. Sic quondam sereni maris facie gaudemus; sic caelum sidera lunam solemque miramur. Num te horum aliquid attingit? Num audes alicuius talium splendore gloriari? An uernis floribus ipse distmgueris aut tua in aestiuos fructus intumescit ubertas? Quid inanibus gaudiis raperis? Quid externa bona pro tuis amplexaris? Numquam tua faciet esse fortuna quae a te natura rerum fecit aliena. Terrarum quidem fructus animantium procul dubio debentur alimentis. Sed si, quod naturae satis est, replere indigentiam uelis, nihil est quod fortunae affluentiam petas. Paucis enim minimisque natura contenta est, cuius satietatem si superfluis urgere uelis, aut iniucnndum quod infuderis fiet aut noxium.
For it is a beautiful portion of a most beautiful work. So at times we rejoice in the face of a calm sea; so we marvel at the sky, the stars, the moon, and the sun. Does any of these touch you? Do you dare to boast in the splendor of any such thing? Are you yourself distinguished by spring flowers, or does your fertility swell into summer fruits? Why are you carried away by empty joys? Why do you embrace external goods as your own? Never will Fortune make to be yours the things which the nature of things has made foreign to you. The fruits of the earth, without doubt, are owed to the nourishment of living creatures. But if you would fill up your need with what suffices for nature, there is no reason for you to seek Fortune's affluence. For with few and least things is nature content, whose satiety if you should press with superfluities, what you have poured in will become either unpleasant or harmful.
因為它乃是至美之工的一個美麗部分。我們有時為平靜之海的面容而歡喜;我們也驚嘆天空、星辰、月亮與太陽。這些之中有哪樣是觸及你的麼?你竟敢以任何這類之物的光彩誇口麼?你自己豈以春花為妝飾,或你的肥沃豈漲溢成夏日的果實麼?你為何被虛空的喜樂所擄掠?你為何將身外之福當作自己的擁抱?命運絕不能使那萬物之本性已判為與你無關之物成為你的。地上的果子,無疑是供應活物滋養所應有的。但你若願以那足夠本性之物來填補你的需要,便無須尋求命運的豐裕。因為本性以少許至微之物為足,你若以多餘之物逼壓它的飽足,所傾入的便要成為令人不悅、或有害之物。
2:23
Iam uero pulchrum uariis fulgere uestibus putas, quarum si grata intuitu species est, aut materiae naturam aut ingenium mirabor artificis. An uero te longus ordo famulorum facit esse felicem? Qui si uitiosi moribus sint, perniciosa domus sarcina et ipsi domino uehementer inimica; sin uero probi, quonam modo in tuis opibus aliena probitas numerabitur? Ex quibus omnibus nihil horum quae tu in tuis conputas bonis tuum esse bonum liquido monstratur. Quibus si nihil inest appetendae pulchritudinis, quid est quod uel amissis doleas uel laeteris retentis? Quod si natura pulchra sunt, quid id tua refert? Nam haec per se a tuis quoque opibus sequestrata placuissent. Neque enim idcirco sunt pretiosa quod in tuas uenere diuitias, sed quoniam pretiosa uidebantur, tuis ea diuitiis adnumerare maluisti. Quid autem tanto fortunae strepitu desideratis?
Now indeed do you think it beautiful to glitter in varied garments? If the appearance of these is pleasing to the gaze, I shall admire either the nature of the material or the genius of the craftsman. Or does a long train of servants make you happy? Who, if they are vicious in their ways, are a destructive burden to the household and vehemently hostile to the master himself; but if they are honest, in what way shall the probity of others be reckoned among your goods? From all of which it is plainly shown that none of these things which you count among your goods is your own good. And if there is in them no beauty to be sought, what is there that you should either grieve over when they are lost or rejoice over when they are retained? But if they are beautiful by nature, what is that to you? For these would have pleased of themselves, set apart even from your riches. For they are not precious because they have come into your wealth, but, because they seemed precious, you preferred to count them among your riches. But what do you desire with so great an uproar of Fortune?
如今你竟以為穿戴各樣華服而閃耀為美麗麼?這些的外觀若悅人眼目,我所要讚嘆的,乃是那材料的本性、或那工匠的天才。抑或一長列僕從使你快樂麼?這些人若行事敗壞,便是家中一個毀壞的累贅,對主人本身極其有害;但他們若誠實正直,別人的正直又怎能算在你的福分中呢?由這一切便明白顯出:凡你算在你福分中之物,沒有一樣是你自己的善。它們裡面若無可尋求之美,那麼有甚麼可叫你或為其喪失而憂傷、或為其保有而歡喜?但它們若本性是美的,那於你又何干?因為這些即使與你的財富分開,本身也自會悅人。它們並非因進入你的財富而成為寶貴,乃是因它們看似寶貴,你才寧願把它們算在你的財富中。但你以命運如此大的喧囂所渴求的,究竟是甚麼?
2:24
Fugare credo indigentiam copia quaeritis. Atqui hoc uobis in contrarium cedit. Pluribus quippe adminiculis opus est ad tuendam pretiosae supellectilis uarietatem, uerumque illud est permultis eos indigere qui permulta possideant contraque minimum qui abundantiam suam naturae necessitate non ambitus superfluitate metiantur. Itane autem nullum est proprium uobis atque insitum bonum ut in externis ac sepositis rebus bona uestra quaeratis? Sic rerum uersa condicio est ut diuinum merito rationis animal non aliter sibi splendere nisi inanimatae supellectilis possessione uideatur? Et alia quidem suis contenta sunt; uos autem deo mente consimiles ab rebus infimis excellente naturae ornamenta captatis nec intellegitis quantam conditori uestro faciatis iniuriam.
You seek, I believe, to drive away need by abundance. And yet this turns out for you to the contrary. For more props are needed to guard the variety of precious furnishings, and that saying is true, that they who possess much have need of much, and, on the contrary, they have need of least who measure their abundance by the necessity of nature and not by the superfluity of ambition. Is it then so, that you have no proper and implanted good of your own, that you seek your goods in external and detached things? Is the condition of things so reversed that a divine creature, by the merit of reason, seems to itself to shine in no other way than by the possession of inanimate furniture? And other things indeed are content with their own; but you, like to God in your minds, snatch at ornaments for your excelling nature from the lowest things, nor do you understand how great an injury you do to your Creator.
我相信你乃是想藉豐裕驅走貧乏。然而這對你竟適得其反。因為要看守那寶貴陳設的繁多種類,需用更多的支撐物;那句話也是真的:擁有許多的人需用許多,反之,那以本性的需要、而非野心的多餘來衡量自己豐裕之人,所需用的卻最少。難道竟是這樣,你沒有屬於自己本分的、內在的善,以致你在身外、與己無干之物中尋求你的福分麼?萬物的處境竟如此顛倒,以致一個按理性的功德有神性的活物,竟覺得自己除非藉著占有無生命的陳設,便無從顯出光彩麼?別的受造之物固然以自己所有為足;惟你們這些在心思上與神相似的,卻從至卑之物為你們卓越的本性攫取妝飾,竟不明白你們對你們的創造者所行的,是何等大的虧負。
2:25
Ille genus humanum terrenis omnibus praestare uoluit; uos dignitatem uestram infra infima quaeque detruditis. Nam si omne cuiusque bonum eo cuius est constat esse pretiosius, cum uilissima rerum uestra bona esse iudicatis, eisdem uosmet ipsos uestra existimatione submittitis, quod quidem haud inmerito cadit. Humanae quippe naturae ista condicio est ut tum tantum ceteris rebus cum se cognoscit excellat, eadem tamen infra bestias redigatur, si se nosse desierit. Nam ceteris animantibus sese ignorare naturae est; hominibus uitio uenit. Quam uero late patet uester hic error qui ornari posse aliquid ornamentis existimatis alienis? At id fieri nequit. Nam si quid ex appositis luceat, ipsa quidem quae sunt apposita laudantur; illud uero his tectum atque uelatum in sua nihilo minus foeditate perdurat.
He willed the human race to excel all earthly things; you thrust down your dignity beneath the very lowest. For if every good of each thing is agreed to be more precious than that to which it belongs, when you judge the basest of things to be your goods, you submit your very selves, in your own estimation, beneath them — which indeed falls out not undeservedly. For such is the condition of human nature, that only then does it excel other things when it knows itself, yet the same is reduced below the beasts if it has ceased to know itself. For to other living creatures to be ignorant of themselves is natural; to men it comes as a fault. How widely, indeed, does this error of yours extend, who think that anything can be adorned with adornments not its own! But this cannot be. For if anything shines out from things added to it, the things that are added are indeed praised; but that which is covered and veiled by these endures none the less in its own foulness.
祂定意要使人類超越一切屬地之物;你們卻把自己的尊嚴貶到至卑之物以下。因為各物的一切善,若公認比其所屬之物更為寶貴,那麼當你們判定萬物中至賤之物為你們的福分時,便在你們自己的估量中把自己貶到它們之下——這實在是不無應得地臨到的。因為人性的處境是這樣:惟有當它認識自己時,才超越別的事物,然而它若不再認識自己,這同一的人性便淪落到走獸之下。因為別的活物不認識自己乃是本性使然;於人卻成了過失。你們這謬誤伸展得何其廣闊,竟以為任何物能藉非己之妝飾而得裝飾!但這是不能的。因為若有甚麼物從加添於它的東西上發光,受讚美的乃是那加添之物;至於被這些所遮蓋、所遮蔽之物,仍照舊存留在自己的醜陋中,毫不減退。
2:26
Ego uero nego ullum esse bonum quod noceat habenti. Num id mentior? ' Minime,' inquis. Atqui diuitiae possidentibus persaepe nocuerunt, cum pessimus quisque eoque alieni magis auidus quidquid usquam auri gemmarumque est se solum qui habeat dignissimum putat. Tu igitur qui nunc contum gladiumque sollicitus pertimescis, si uitae huius callem uacuus uiator intrasses, coram latrone cantares. O praeclara opum mortalium beatitudo quam cum adeptus fueris securus esse desistis! Felix nimium prior aetas Contenta fidelibus aruis Nec inerti perdita luxu, Facili quae sera solebat Ieiunia soluere glande. Non Bacchica munera norant Liquido confundere melle Nec lucida uellera Serum Tyrio miscere ueneno. Somnos dabat herba salubres, Potum quoque lubricus amnis, Vmbras altissima pinus.
But I, for my part, deny that anything is a good which harms its possessor. Do I lie in this? 'By no means,' you say. And yet riches have very often harmed their possessors, since each most wicked man, and therefore the more greedy for what belongs to another, thinks himself alone most worthy to have whatever gold and gems there are anywhere. You, therefore, who now anxiously dread the pike and the sword, if you had entered the path of this life as an empty-handed traveler, would sing in the presence of the robber. O the splendid blessedness of mortal wealth, which, when you have attained it, you cease to be secure! Too happy was the former age, content with the faithful fields, not ruined by sluggish luxury, which was wont to break its long-deferred fasting with the easily-gotten acorn. They knew not to confound the gifts of Bacchus with liquid honey, nor to dye the shining fleeces of the Seres with Tyrian poison. The grass gave wholesome sleep, the gliding stream too gave drink, and the tallest pine gave shade.
但我這方面卻否認凡有害於擁有者之物能算為善。我這話豈是謊言麼?「絕非如此,」你說。然而財富卻屢屢害了擁有者,因為每個至惡之人,正因更貪圖別人之物,便自以為惟獨他最配擁有世上任何地方所有的金子與寶石。所以你如今焦慮地懼怕長矛與利劍,倘若你曾兩手空空作為旅人踏上這人生之路,便會在強盜面前歌唱。必死之財那輝煌的福樂啊,當你得著它時,竟不再得享安穩!從前的世代何等有福,以信實的田畝為足,不被怠惰的奢華所毀,慣以易得的橡實打破久延的飢餓。他們不知將酒神的禮物與流質的蜂蜜混和,也不知以推羅的染料染那賽里斯人發亮的絲帛。青草賜下安康的睡眠,潺潺的溪流也賜下飲水,至高的松樹賜下蔭涼。
2:27
Nondum maris alta secabat Nec mercibus undique lectis Noua litora uiderat hospes. Tunc classica saeua tacebant, Odiis neque fusus acerbis Cruor horrida tinxerat arua. Quid enim furor hosticus ulla Vellet prior arma mouere, Cum uulnera saeua uiderent Nec praemia sanguinis ulla? Vtinam modo nostra redirent In mores tempora priscos! Sed saeuior ignibus Aetnae Feruens amor ardet habendi. Heu primus quis fuit ille Auri qui pondera tecti Geminasque latere uolentes Pretiosa pericula fodit? Quid autem de dignitatibus potentiaque disseram quae uos uerae dignitatis ac potestatis inscii caelo exaequatis? Quae si in improbissimum quemque ceciderunt, quae flammis Aetnae eructuantibus, quod diluuium tantas strages dederint?
Not yet did the stranger cleave the deeps of the sea, nor, with wares gathered from everywhere, had he seen new shores. Then the savage war-trumpets were silent, nor had blood, poured out in bitter hatreds, stained the dreadful fields. For why would hostile fury wish to be the first to set arms in motion, when it saw cruel wounds and no rewards of blood? Would that our times might now return to the ancient ways! But, fiercer than the fires of Etna, the burning love of having blazes hot. Alas, who was that first man who dug up the masses of buried gold and the gems that would lie hidden — precious perils? But what shall I say of dignities and power, which you, ignorant of true dignity and power, set level with heaven? Which, if they have fallen upon the most wicked of men — what flames of erupting Etna, what deluge would have wrought such great destruction?
那時,異鄉客尚未劈開大海的深處,也未曾以四處搜羅的貨物見過新的海岸。那時,兇暴的軍號靜默,鮮血也未曾因苦毒的仇恨而傾流、染污了那可怖的田野。因為當敵意的狂怒看見殘忍的傷口、卻無流血之賞時,又怎會願意率先動干戈呢?但願我們的時代如今能回到古昔的風俗!然而那占有的灼熱之愛,比埃特納火山的烈火更兇猛地熾燃。唉,誰是那頭一個挖出深埋之金塊、與寧願潛藏之寶石——這些寶貴的危險——的人呢?至於尊榮與權勢,我又能說甚麼?你們既不識真正的尊榮與權柄,竟把它們抬到與天同高。這些若落在最惡之人身上——埃特納噴發的何等烈焰、何等洪水,能造成這樣大的毀滅呢?
2:28
Certe, uti meminisse te arbitror, consulare imperium, quod libertatis principium fuerat, ob superbiam consulum uestri ueteres abolere cupiuerunt, qui ob eandem superbiam prius regium de ciuitate nomen abstulerant. At si quando, quod perrarum est, probis deferantur, quid in eis aliud quam probitas utentium placet? Ita fit ut non uirtutibus ex dignitate sed ex uirtute dignitatibus honor accedat. Quae uero est ista uestra expetibilis ac praeclara potentia? Nonne, o terrena animalia, consideratis quibus qui praesidere uideamini? Nunc si inter mures uideres unum aliquem ius sibi ac potestatem prae ceteris uindicantem, quanto mouereris cachinno! Quid uero, si corpus spectes, inbecillius homine reperire queas quos saepe muscularum quoque uel morsus uel in secreta quaeque reptantium necat introitus?
Surely, as I think you remember, your forebears of old desired to abolish the consular power, which had been the beginning of liberty, on account of the pride of the consuls — they who, on account of the same pride, had earlier taken away the name of king from the city. But if at any time — which is very rare — these dignities are conferred on good men, what else pleases in them than the probity of those who use them? Thus it comes about that honor accrues not to virtues from dignity, but to dignities from virtue. But what is that desirable and illustrious power of yours? Do you not consider, O earthly creatures, over whom you seem to preside? Now if among mice you should see some one claiming for himself right and power over the rest, with how great a laugh would you be moved! What, however, if you regard the body — could you find anything weaker than man, whom often even the bites of tiny flies, or the entrance of creatures creeping into his hidden parts, kills?
誠然,正如我想你所記得的,你那古昔的先祖,因執政官的驕傲,渴望廢除那曾為自由之開端的執政官權柄——他們先前也因同樣的驕傲,把君王之名從城中除去。但若有時——這是極其罕有的——這些尊榮授予了好人,在他們身上所悅人的,豈非那使用尊榮之人的正直麼?如此便有此結果:尊榮並非從尊位加於德行,乃是榮耀從德行加於尊位。但你們那可羨慕、顯赫的權勢究竟是甚麼?屬地的活物啊,你們豈不思想你們所統管的是何等之物麼?此刻你若在群鼠之中,看見某一隻為自己爭奪超乎其餘的權利與權勢,你必何等捧腹大笑!再者,你若看身體,又能找到比人更軟弱之物麼?人常被細小蒼蠅的叮咬、或爬入他隱密之處的活物之侵入所殺。
2:29
Quo uero quisquam ius aliquod in quempiam nisi in solum corpus et quod infra corpus est, fortunam loquor, possit exserere? Num quidquam libero imperabis animo? Num mentem firma sibi ratione cohaerentem de statu propriae quietis amouebis? Cum liberum quendam uirum suppliciis se tyrannus adacturum Putaret, ut aduersum se factae coniurationis conscios proderet, linguam ille momordit atque abscidit et in os tyranni saeuientis abiecit; ita cruciatus, quos putabat tyrannus materiam crudelitatis, uir sapiens fecit esse uirtutis. Quid autem est quod in alium facere quisquam 1 possit, quod sustinere ab alio ipse non possit? Busiridem accipimus necare hospites solitum ab Hercule hospite fuisse mactatum. Regulus plures Poenorum bello captos in uincla coniecerat, sed mox ipse uictorum catenis manus praebuit.
Over what, indeed, can anyone exert any right against another except over the body alone, and over what is below the body — I mean Fortune? Will you command anything to a free mind? Will you move from the state of its own quiet a mind cohering to itself by firm reason? When a tyrant thought he would by tortures drive a certain free man to betray his accomplices in a conspiracy formed against him, the man bit off his tongue, cut it off, and threw it into the face of the raging tyrant; thus the tortures, which the tyrant supposed to be material for cruelty, the wise man made to be material for virtue. But what is there that anyone can do to another which he cannot himself endure from another? We are told that Busiris, accustomed to slay his guests, was himself slain by his guest Hercules. Regulus had cast into bonds many of the Carthaginians captured in war, but soon thereafter he himself offered his hands to the chains of the victors.
事實上,除了單單對身體、以及對身體以下之物——我是指命運——以外,有誰能對別人行使任何權柄呢?你能向一個自由的心思下任何命令麼?你能把一個藉堅固理性與自己相連的心思,從它自己安寧的狀態挪移麼?當一個暴君以為他能藉酷刑逼迫某個自由人出賣那些參與謀反、密謀對付他的同夥時,那人咬斷自己的舌頭、割了下來,扔在那暴怒之暴君的臉上;如此,暴君以為是殘暴材料的酷刑,智者反使之成了德行的材料。但有甚麼是任何人能對別人施行、自己卻不能從別人承受的呢?我們聽說布西里斯慣於殺戮他的客旅,自己卻被他的客旅赫丘利所殺。雷古魯斯曾把許多戰中所擒的迦太基人投入捆鎖,但不久之後他自己卻把雙手交給了戰勝者的鎖鏈。
2:30
Vllamne igitur eius hominis potentiam putas, qui quod ipse in alio potest, ne id in se alter ualeat efficere non possit? Ad haec si ipsis dignitates ac potestatibus inesset aliquid naturalis ac proprii boni, numquam pessimis prouenirent. Neque enim sibi solent aduersa sociari; natura respuit ut contraria quaeque iungantur. Ita cum pessimos plerumque dignitatibus fungi dubium non sit, illud etiam liquet natura sui bona non esse quae se pessimis haerere patiantur. Quod quidem de cunctis fortunae muneribus dignius existimari potest, quae ad improbissimum quemque uberiora perueniunt. De quibus illud etiam considerandum puto, quod nemo dubitat esse fortem, cui fortitudinem inesse conspexerit, et cuicumque uelocitas adest manifestum est esse uelocem. Sic musica quidem musicos medicina medicos rhetorice rhetores facit.
Do you then reckon any power to belong to that man who cannot bring it about that another should not be able to do to him what he himself can do to another? Besides, if there were in dignities and powers themselves anything of natural and proper good, they would never fall to the worst men. For adverse things are not wont to be allied together; nature spurns that contraries should be joined. Since, then, there is no doubt that the worst men for the most part hold dignities, this too is plain: that those things are not good by their own nature which suffer themselves to cleave to the worst men. And this indeed may more worthily be judged concerning all the gifts of Fortune, which come more abundantly to the most wicked. Concerning these, this too I think must be considered: that no one doubts him to be brave in whom he has beheld bravery to be present, and to whomever swiftness belongs it is manifest that he is swift. So music makes musicians, medicine physicians, rhetoric rhetoricians.
那麼,你竟以為那不能使「別人不能對他施行他所能對別人施行之事」的人有甚麼權勢麼?再者,尊榮與權勢本身若有任何天然、本分的善,就絕不會落在最惡之人身上。因為相反之物向來不慣結合;本性厭棄相對之物相聯結。那麼,既然毫無疑問最惡之人大多握有尊榮,這也就明顯了:凡甘讓自己依附於最惡之人之物,本性並非是善的。而論到命運的一切禮物,這事實在可更妥當地判定,因為這些禮物更豐盛地臨到最惡之人。論到這些,我想這事也當思想:無人懷疑那被看出有勇之人是勇敢的,凡有敏捷之人,他敏捷也是顯明的。照樣,音樂造就音樂家,醫術造就醫師,修辭造就修辭家。
2:31
Agit enim cuiusque rei natura quod proprium est nec contrariarum rerum miscetur effectibus et ultro quae sunt auersa depellit. Atqui nec opes inexpletam restinguere auaritiam queunt nec potestas sui compotem fecerit quem uitiosae libidines insolubilibus adstrictum retinent catenis, et collata improbis dignitas non modo non efficit dignos, sed prodit potius et ostentat indignos. Cur ita prouenit? Gaudetis enim res sese aliter habentes falsis compellare nominibus quae facile ipsarum rerum redarguuntur effectu; itaque nec illae diuitiae nec illa potentia nec haec dignitas iure appellari potest. Postremo idem de tota concludere fortuna licet in qua nihil expetendum, nihil natiuae bonitatis inesse manifestum est, quae nec se bonis semper adiungit et bonos quibus fuerit adiuncta non efficit.
For the nature of each thing does what is proper to it, nor is it mingled with the effects of contrary things, and of its own accord it drives off what is averse to it. And yet neither can riches quench insatiable avarice, nor will power make master of himself one whom vicious lusts hold bound with indissoluble chains; and dignity conferred on the wicked not only does not make them worthy, but rather betrays and exposes them as unworthy. Why does it so come about? Because you take delight in calling things, which are otherwise, by false names — names which are easily refuted by the very effect of the things themselves. And so neither those riches, nor that power, nor this dignity can rightly be so called. Finally, the same may be concluded concerning Fortune as a whole, in which it is manifest that there is nothing to be desired, nothing of native goodness, which neither always joins itself to the good, nor makes good those to whom it has been joined.
因為各物的本性行其所固有的,不與相反之物的果效混雜,且自發地驅走與它相違之物。然而,財富既不能止熄無饜的貪婪,權勢也不能使一個被敗壞情慾以無解之鏈捆鎖之人作自己的主;授予惡人的尊榮,不僅不使他們配得,反倒揭發、暴露他們不配。為何竟如此呢?因為你們喜歡以虛假之名稱呼那本不如此之物——這些名稱輕易就被事物本身的果效所駁倒。因此,那財富、那權勢、這尊榮,都不能被正當地如此稱呼。末了,論到整個命運也可作同樣的結論:其中顯然毫無可羨慕、毫無天生善性之物,它既不總與善人相聯,也不使凡與它相聯之人成為善的。
2:32
Nouimus quantas dederit ruinas Vrbe flammata patribusque caesis Fratre qui quondam ferus interempto Matris effuso maduit cruore Corpus et uisu gelidum pererrans Ora non tinxit lacrimis, sed esse Censor extincti potuit decoris. Hic tamen sceptro populos regebat Quos uidet condens radios sub undas Phoebus extremo ueniens ab ortu, Quos premunt septem gelidi triones, Quos Notus sicco uiolentus aestu Torret ardentes recoquens harenas. Celsa num tandem ualuit potestas Vertere praui rabiem Neronis? Heu grauem sortem, quotiens iniquus Additur saeuo gladius ueneno! Tum ego: Scis, inquam, ipsa minimum nobis ambitionem mortalium rerum fuisse dominatam. Sed materiam gerendis rebus optauimus quo ne uirtus tacita consenesceret. Et illa:
We know how great were the ruins he wrought, with the City in flames and the senators slain — he who, savage, once, when his brother had been murdered, was drenched with his mother's outpoured blood, and, ranging over her body, cold to the sight, did not wet his face with tears, but could be a critic of beauty now extinguished. Yet this man ruled with his scepter the peoples whom Phoebus beholds as he sinks his rays beneath the waves, coming from the farthest dawn — whom the seven chill stars of the Plough press hard, whom the South Wind, violent with its dry heat, scorches, baking the burning sands. Could exalted power, then, at last avail to turn the madness of perverse Nero? Alas, the grievous lot, as often as the unjust sword is added to savage poison! Then I: 'You know yourself,' I said, 'that ambition for mortal things has held the least dominion over me. But I desired material for the doing of deeds, lest virtue should grow old in silence.' And she:
我們知道他釀成了何等的毀滅,使羅馬城陷於火焰、元老遭屠戮——這人,這兇殘者,從前在謀殺了自己的兄弟之後,渾身被他母親傾流的血所浸透,又在她那看來冰冷的屍身上巡視,竟不以淚水沾濕自己的臉,反能作那已熄滅之美貌的評鑑者。然而這人卻以王杖統管萬民,就是太陽從最遙遠的東方而來、把光芒沉入波濤之下時所俯視的萬民——是大熊座那七顆寒星所逼壓的,是南風以其乾熱兇暴炙烤、烤焦灼熱沙地之處的萬民。那麼,那至高的權勢,究竟能否扭轉乖戾尼祿的瘋狂?唉,那沉重的命分啊,每逢不義的刀劍加在兇殘的毒藥之上!於是我說:「你自己知道,」我說,「對必死之物的野心在我身上所握的權柄極其微小。我所渴望的,乃是行事的材料,免得德行在緘默中衰老。」她說:
2:33
Atqui hoc unum est quod praestantes quidem natura mentes sed nondum ad extremam manum uirtutum perfectione perductas allicere possit, gloriae scilicet cupido et optimorum in rem publicam fama meritorum; quae quam sit exilis et totius uacua ponderis, sic considera. Omnem terrae ambitum, sicuti astrologicis demonstrationibus accepisti, ad caeli spatium puncti constat obtinere rationem, id est ut, si ad caelestis globi magnitudinem conferatur, nihil spatii prorsus habere iudicetur. Huius igitur tam exiguae in mundo regionis quarta fere portio est, sicut Ptolomaeo probante didicisti, quae nobis cognitis animantibus incolatur Huic quartae, si quantum maria paludesque premunt quantumque siti uasta regio distenditur cogitatione subtraxeris, uix angustissima inhabitandi hominibus area relinquetur.
And yet there is one thing that can allure minds which are by nature excellent but not yet brought to the final perfection of the virtues — namely the desire of glory and the renown of outstanding services to the commonwealth. But consider how slight a thing this is and how empty of all weight. The whole compass of the earth, as you have learned from the demonstrations of astronomy, holds, in relation to the expanse of the heavens, the ratio of a mere point; that is, if it be compared to the magnitude of the celestial sphere, it is judged to have no extent at all. And of this so very tiny region of the world, only about a fourth part, as you have learned on the authority of Ptolemy, is inhabited by living creatures known to us. If from this fourth part you subtract in thought all that seas and marshes press down and all that the vast region parched with drought stretches over, scarcely the most narrow space is left for human habitation.
然而有一樣東西,能吸引那些本性卓越、卻尚未被引導至德行最終完美的心靈——那就是對榮耀的渴望,以及因對國家立下卓越功勳而得的名聲。但你且思想這是何等微薄、何等毫無分量。整個大地的範圍,正如你從天文學的論證所學到的,相對於天空的廣袤,所佔的不過是一個點的比例;也就是說,若與天球的巨大相比,它被判定為毫無廣延可言。而在世界這如此微小的區域中,正如你從托勒密的權威所學到的,僅約四分之一是為我們所知的生物所居住。若你在思想中從這四分之一裡,減去海洋與沼澤所佔據的、以及乾旱荒蕪之地所延展的,那麼留給人類居住的,幾乎只剩最狹窄的一塊地方。
2:34
In hoc igitur minimo puncti quodam puncto circumsaepti atque conclusi de peruulganda fama, de proferendo nomine cogitatis? Aut quid habeat amplum magnificumque gloria tam angustis exiguisque limitibus artata? Adde quod hoc ipsum breuis habitaculi saeptum plures incolunt nationes lingua, moribus, totius uitae ratione distantes, ad quas tum difficultate itinerum tum loquendi diuersitate tum commercii insolentia non modo fama hominum singulorum sed ne urbium quidem peruenire queat. Aetate denique Marci Tullii, sicut ipse quodam loco significat, nondum Caucasum montem Romanae rei publicae fama transcenderat, et erat tunc adulta Parthis etiam ceterisque id locorum gentibus formidolosa. Videsne igitur quam sit angusta, quam compressa gloria quam dilatare ac propagare laboratis?
Hemmed in then and shut up within this smallest point of a point, do you think about spreading your fame and making your name known? Or what is there grand and magnificent in a glory cramped within such narrow and meager bounds? Add to this that within this very enclosure of a tiny dwelling-place there live many nations differing in language, in customs, in their whole way of life — nations to which, whether by the difficulty of travel, or by diversity of speech, or by the rarity of commerce, not only the fame of individual men but not even that of cities can reach. In the age of Marcus Tullius, finally, as he himself indicates in a certain passage, the fame of the Roman commonwealth had not yet crossed Mount Caucasus, though it was by then full-grown and dreaded even by the Parthians and the other peoples of those regions. Do you see then how narrow, how confined is that glory which you labor to spread abroad and propagate?
那麼,你既被圍困、被囚禁在這點中之點的極小空間裡,竟還思想要傳揚你的名聲、宣揚你的名字嗎?或者,被局限在如此狹窄微薄的界限之內的榮耀,又有甚麼宏大壯麗可言?還要加上一點:就連這小小居所的範圍之內,也住著許多在語言、風俗、整個生活方式上彼此不同的民族——對這些民族而言,無論是因路途艱難、語言互異,還是因往來稀少,不僅個別之人的名聲,就連城邦的名聲也無法傳達到。最後,在馬庫斯·圖利烏斯的時代,正如他自己在某處所指出的,羅馬國的名聲尚未越過高加索山,雖然那時它已然壯大,連帕提亞人及那些地區的其他民族都對它畏懼。那麼你是否看見,你所竭力傳揚、擴展的榮耀,是何等狹窄、何等局促?
2:35
An ubi Romani nominis transire fama nequit, Romani hominis gloria progredietur? Quid quod diuersarum gentium mores inter se atque instituta discordant, ut quod apud alios laude apud alios supplicio dignum iudicetur. Quo fit ut si quem famae praedicatio delectat, huic in plurimos populos nomen proferre nullo modo conducat. Erit igitur peruagata inter suos gloria quisque contentus et intra unius gentis terminos praeclara illa famae inmortalitas coartabitur. Sed quam multos clarissimos suis temporibus uiros scriptorum inops deleuit obliuio! Quamquam quid ipsa scripta proficiant, quae cum suis auctoribus premit longior atque obscura uetustas? Vos uero inmortalitatem uobis propagare uidemini, cum futuri famam temporis cogitatis. Quod si aeternitatis infinita spatia pertractes, quid habes quod de nominis tui diuturnitate laeteris?
Or where the fame of the Roman name cannot pass, will the glory of a Roman man advance? What of the fact that the customs and institutions of different peoples disagree among themselves, so that what among some is judged worthy of praise, among others is judged worthy of punishment? Hence it comes about that, if any man delights in the proclaiming of his fame, it in no way profits him to carry his name to many peoples. So each will be content with a glory spread abroad among his own, and that splendid immortality of fame will be confined within the borders of a single nation. But how many men, most illustrious in their own times, has the forgetfulness caused by the lack of writers blotted out! And yet what do writings themselves avail, which, together with their authors, a more lengthy and obscure antiquity buries? But you indeed seem to yourselves to procure immortality when you think of the fame of time to come. Yet if you ponder the boundless spaces of eternity, what have you to rejoice over in the long endurance of your name?
或者,在羅馬之名的聲望都無法越過的地方,一個羅馬人的榮耀豈能前進?再者,不同民族的風俗與制度彼此相違,以致在某些人中被判為當受讚揚的,在另一些人中卻被判為當受刑罰。由此可見,倘若有人以宣揚自己的名聲為樂,把名字傳到許多民族中對他毫無益處。所以各人只能滿足於在自己人中間傳揚的榮耀,而那名聲輝煌的不朽,將被局限在單一民族的疆界之內。然而有多少在自己時代極為顯赫的人物,因缺乏作者記載而被遺忘所抹去!再說,著作本身又有何用?它們連同其作者,一同被更久遠、更模糊的歲月所掩埋。你們卻自以為在為自己謀求不朽,當你們想著將來時代的名聲。但你若細想永恆那無垠的廣袤,你的名字縱然長久存留,又有甚麼可叫你歡欣的呢?
2:36
Vnius etenim mora momenti, si decem milibus conferatur annis, quoniam utrumque spatium definitum est, minimam, licet, habet tamen aliquam portionem. At hic ipse numerus annorum eiusque quamlibet multiplex ad interminabilem diuturnitatem ne comparari quidem potest. Etenim finitis ad se inuicem fuerit quaedam, infiniti uero atque finiti nulla umquam poterit esse collatio. Ita fit ut quamlibet prolixi temporis fama, si cum inexhausta aeternitate cogitetur, non parua sed plane nulla esse uideatur. Vos autem nisi ad populares auras inanesque rumores recte facere nescitis et relicta conscientiae uirtutisque praestantia de alienis praemia sermunculis postulatis. Accipe in huiusmodi arrogantiae leuitate quam festiue aliquis inluserit.
For the duration of a single moment, if it be compared with ten thousand years, since both spans are finite, holds — granted, a very small one, yet still some — proportion. But this very number of years, however many times multiplied, can in no way even be compared with endless duration. For there can be some comparison of finite things one with another, but of the infinite and the finite there can never be any comparison at all. Thus it comes about that the fame of however prolonged a time, if it be set against inexhaustible eternity, will seem to be not small but plainly nothing. But you, unless to win popular breath and empty rumors, know not how to do right, and abandoning the excellence of conscience and virtue, you demand your rewards from the idle chatter of others. Hear how wittily a certain man once mocked the frivolity of such arrogance.
因為一瞬間的時間,若與一萬年相比,由於兩段時間都是有限的,固然只佔極小的比例,卻仍佔有某種比例。但這年數,無論被乘以多少倍,都絕無法與無盡的綿延相比。因為有限之物彼此之間尚可有某種比較,但無限與有限之間卻永遠不可能有任何比較。由此可見,無論多麼漫長的時間所帶來的名聲,若與那不竭的永恆相比,就顯得不只是微小,而是全然虛無。然而你們,若不是為了博得眾人的氣息與空洞的傳言,竟不知如何行善,反而捨棄了良心與德行的卓越,從別人閒言碎語中索取你們的賞報。且聽某人是何等詼諧地嘲笑這種傲慢的輕浮。
2:37
Nam cum quidam adortus esset hominem contumeliis, qui non ad uerae uirtutis usum sed ad superbam gloriam falsum sibi philosophi nomen induerat, adiecissetque iam se sciturum, an ille philosophus esset, si quidem illatas iniurias leniter patienterque tolerasset, ille patientiam paulisper adsumpsit acceptaque contumelia uelut insultans: 'Iam tandem,' inquit, 'intellegis me esse philosophum?' Tum ille nimium mordaciter: 'Intellexeram,' inquit, ' si tacuisses.' Quid autem est quod ad praecipuos uiros, de his enim sermo est, qui uirtute gloriam petunt, quid, inquam, est quod ad hos de fama post resolutum morte suprema corpus attineat? Nam si, quod nostrae rationes credi uetant, toti moriuntur homines, nulla est omnino gloria, eum is cuius ea esse dicitur non exstet omnino.
For when a certain man had assailed with insults one who had put on the false name of a philosopher not for the use of true virtue but for proud display of glory, and had added that he would now know whether the other was a philosopher, if indeed he should bear the injuries inflicted gently and patiently — the man assumed patience for a little while, and as if exulting in the insult he had received, said: «Now at last do you understand that I am a philosopher?» Then the other said, all too bitingly: «I would have understood it, if you had kept silent.» But what is it that concerns those eminent men — for it is of these we speak, who seek glory through virtue — what, I say, is there for them in fame after the body has been dissolved by death's last hour? For if, as our reasonings forbid us to believe, men die wholly, there is no glory at all, since he to whom it is said to belong has no existence whatever.
因為有一人曾用辱罵攻擊另一人,那人並非為著真德行的緣故,乃是為了驕傲炫耀榮耀,給自己冠上了哲學家的虛名;攻擊者又補充說,他現在就能知道對方是否是哲學家——只要對方溫和而忍耐地承受所加給他的傷害。那人便忍耐了片刻,後來彷彿因所受的侮辱而得意,說:「如今你終於明白我是哲學家了吧?」於是另一人極為尖刻地回答說:「我本會明白的,只要你閉口不言。」然而,對那些卓越之人——我們所談論的正是這等人,就是藉德行尋求榮耀的人——對他們而言,在身體因死亡的末刻而消解之後,名聲又與他們何干?因為,倘若(這是我們的推理禁止我們相信的)人是完全死去的,那就根本沒有榮耀可言,因為那被說擁有榮耀的人已全然不存在了。
2:38
Sin uero bene sibi mens conscia terreno carcere resoluta caelum libera petit, nonne omne terrenum negotium spernat quae se caelo fruens terrenis gaudet exemptam? Quicumque solam mente praecipiti petit Summumque credit gloriam, Late patentes aetheris cernat plagas Artumque terrarum situm. Breuem replere non ualentis ambitum Pudebit aucti nominis. Quid o superbi colla mortali iugo Frustra, leuare gestiunt? Licet remotos fama per populos means Diffusa linguas explicet Et magna titulis fulgeat claris domus, Mors spernit altam gloriam, Inuoluit humile pariter et celsum caput Aequatque summis infima. Vbi nunc fidelis ossa Fabricii manent, Quid Brutus aut rigidus Cato? Signat superstes fama tenuis pauculis Inane nomen litteris. Sed quod decora nouimus uocabula, Num scire consumptos datur? Iacetis ergo prorsus ignorabiles Nec fama notos efficit.
But if the mind, well aware of its own worth, when released from its earthly prison freely seeks heaven, will it not despise every earthly business, and rejoicing in the enjoyment of heaven, count itself exempt from earthly things? Whoever with headlong mind seeks glory alone and counts it the supreme good, let him behold the wide-spreading tracts of the ether and the narrow situation of the lands. He will be ashamed of his swollen name, since it cannot fill even that brief compass. Why, O proud men, do you vainly long to lift your necks from the mortal yoke? Though fame, passing through distant peoples, should unfold their tongues, and a great house should shine with illustrious titles, Death scorns lofty glory, and wraps alike the lowly and the lofty head, and makes the lowest equal to the highest. Where now rest the bones of faithful Fabricius? What is Brutus, or stern Cato? A scant surviving fame marks their empty name with a few letters. But because we know their noble names, are we thereby granted to know the dead? You lie, then, utterly unknown, nor does fame make you known.
但那深知自身價值的心靈,當它從塵世的牢獄中得釋,自由地尋求天界時,豈不要藐視一切屬地的事務,並且因享受天界而以自己為脫離塵世之物嗎?凡以倉促的心專求榮耀,並以之為至善的人,且讓他觀看以太那廣袤的疆域,與大地那狹窄的處所。他必因自己膨脹的名聲而羞愧,因為它連那短小的範圍都填不滿。驕傲的人哪,你們為何徒然渴望從必死的軛下抬起頸項?縱然名聲傳遍遠方的萬民,使眾口傳揚,縱然顯赫的宅第因輝煌的封號而閃耀,死亡卻藐視崇高的榮耀,將卑微與尊貴的頭一同裹去,使至卑的與至高的相等。如今忠信的法布里奇烏斯的骸骨在何處安息?布魯圖斯或剛毅的加圖又算甚麼?一點殘存的微弱名聲,用寥寥數字標記他們空洞的名字。但我們縱然知道他們高貴的名字,難道因此就得以認識那些死者嗎?你們躺臥在那裡,全然無人知曉,名聲也不能叫人認得你們。
2:39
Quod si putatis longius uitam trahi Mortalis aura nominis, Cum sera uobis rapiet hoc etiam dies, Iam uos secunda mors manet. Sed ne me inexorabile contra fortunam gerere bellum putes, est aliquando eum de hominibus illa, fallax illa nihil, bene mereatur, tum scilicet cum se aperit, cum frontem detegit moresque profitetur Nondum forte quid loquar intellegis. Mirum est quod dicere gestio, coque sententiam uerbis explicare uix queo. Etenim plus hominibus reor aduersam quam prosperam prodesse fortunam. Illa enim semper specie felicitatis cum uidetur blanda, mentitur; haec semper uera est, cum se instabilem mutatione demonstrat. Illa fallit, haec instruit, illa mendacium specie bonorum mentes fruentium ligat, haec cognitione fragilis felicitatis absoluit.
But if you think that life is prolonged by the mortal breath of a name, when at last the late day shall snatch even this away from you, then a second death already awaits you. But lest you think that I wage an inexorable war against Fortune, there is a time when she, that deceiver, who is nothing, deserves well of men — namely when she discloses herself, when she lays bare her face and avows her ways. Perhaps you do not yet understand what I am about to say. It is a wondrous thing I am eager to declare, and I can scarcely unfold my meaning in words. For I deem that adverse Fortune profits men more than prosperous. For the latter, always with the appearance of happiness, when she seems caressing, lies; the former is always true, when she shows herself unstable by her changing. The one deceives, the other instructs; the one binds the minds of those who enjoy her with a lying appearance of good things, the other sets them free by the knowledge of fragile happiness.
但你若以為,必死之名的氣息能延長生命,那麼當那遲來的一天連這名聲也要從你奪去時,第二次的死亡便已等候著你。然而,免得你以為我與命運進行著毫不留情的戰爭——那騙人的、其實虛無的命運,有時也對人有益,就是當她顯露自己、揭開她的面容、表明她的本性之時。或許你還不明白我所要說的。我急切要說的,是一件奇妙的事,我幾乎無法用言語表達我的意思。因為我認為,逆境的命運比順境的命運更使人得益。順境命運總以幸福的外貌,在她看似諂媚之時欺哄人;逆境命運卻總是真實的,因她藉著變化顯明自己的反覆無常。前者欺騙人,後者教導人;前者以美善的外貌用謊言捆綁享受她之人的心,後者卻藉著對脆弱幸福的認識使人得釋放。
2:40
Itaque illam uideas uentosam, fluentem suique semper ignaram, hanc sobriam succinctamque et ipsius aduersitatis exercitatione prudentem. Postremo felix a uero bono deuios blanditiis trahit, aduersa plerumque ad uera bona reduces unco retrahit. An hoc inter minima aestimandum putas quod amicorum tibi fidelium mentes haec aspera, haec horribilis fortuna detexit, haec tibi certos sodalium uultus ambiguosque secreuit, discedens suos abstulit, tuos reliquit? Quanti hoc integer, ut uidebaris tibi fortunatus, emisses! Nunc et amissas opes querere; quod pretiosissimum diuitiarum genus est amicos inuenisti.
And so you may see the one windy, flowing, and ever ignorant of herself, but the other sober, well-girded, and made prudent by the very exercise of adversity. Finally, prosperity by her blandishments draws men astray from the true good; adversity for the most part draws them back as with a hook to the true good. Or do you think this should be reckoned among the least of benefits, that this rough, this dreadful Fortune has uncovered for you the minds of your faithful friends? She has sorted out for you the sure faces of your comrades from the doubtful; departing, she has taken away her own and left you yours. At what price, while you were intact and seemed to yourself fortunate, would you have bought this! Now you complain of riches lost; you have found friends, which are the most precious kind of riches.
如此你便可看見:一個是飄忽不定、流動不居、且永遠不認識自己的,另一個卻是清醒、束緊、並因逆境的操練而成為審慎的。最後,順境以其諂媚把人引離真善;逆境卻多半像用鉤子把人拉回真善。又或者,你以為這該算作最微小的好處嗎——就是這粗糲、這可怖的命運,為你揭露了你忠信朋友的心思?她為你把同伴中可靠的面孔與可疑的分別出來;她離去之時,帶走了屬她的,留下了屬你的。當你完好無損、自以為幸運之時,你願出何等的代價來換取這事!如今你哀嘆失去的財富;你卻尋得了朋友,那是最寶貴的一類財富。
2:41
Quod mundus stabili fide Concordes uariat uices, Quod pugnantia semina Foedus perpetuum tenent, Quod Phoebus roseum diem Curru prouehit aureo, Vt quas duxerit Hesperos Phoebe noctibus imperet, Vt fluctus auidum mare Certo fine coerceat, Ne terris liceat uagis Latos tendere terminos. Hanc rerum seriem ligat Terras ac pelagus regens Et caelo imperitans amor. Hic si frena remiserit, Quidquid nunc amat inuicem Bellum continuo geret Et quam nunc socia fide Pulchris motibus incitant, Certent soluere machinam. Hic sancto populos quoque Iunctos foedere continet, Hic et coniugii sacrum Castis nectit amoribus, Hic fidis etiam sua Dictat iura sodalibus. O felix hominum genus, Si uestros animos amor Quo caelum regitur regat.
That the world with steadfast faith varies its harmonious changes; that the warring seeds keep a perpetual covenant; that Phoebus brings forth the rosy day in his golden chariot, so that Phoebe may rule by night over the hours that Hesperus has led in; that the greedy sea confines its waves within a fixed bound, lest it be permitted to the wandering lands to stretch broad their borders — this whole series of things is bound fast by love, which rules the lands and the sea and governs the heaven. If love should slacken the reins, all things that now love one another would straightway wage war, and would strive to break in pieces the engine which now in friendly faith they drive on by their fair movements. This love also holds nations joined by a holy covenant, this binds the sacred bond of marriage with chaste loves, this too dictates its laws to faithful comrades. O happy race of men, if the love by which heaven is ruled should rule your minds!
宇宙以堅定不移的信實使其和諧的更替變化;相互爭戰的元素持守永久的盟約;福玻斯駕著金車帶出玫瑰色的白晝,使福柏在夜間統管赫斯佩魯斯所引入的時辰;貪婪的大海將其波濤約束在固定的界限之內,免得遊蕩的陸地得以放寬其疆界——這一切事物的次序,都被那愛緊緊束結,這愛治理陸地與海洋,並統管諸天。倘若這愛鬆開韁繩,凡如今彼此相愛的萬物便要立即爭戰,並要竭力拆毀那如今牠們以友好的信實藉其美好運行所推動的機器。這愛也使各民族藉聖約結連,使婚姻的神聖以貞潔的愛繫結,並向忠信的同伴頒定其律法。人類何等有福,倘若那治理諸天的愛能治理你們的心思!