📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original
♥ Support

← All books · Latin Fathers › Consolation of Philosophy

Consolation of Philosophy 3 part 1/2

Latin original · 31 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 3:1–3:31 (61 verses in all)

← ch. 2ch. 4 →
next part →
ℹ️ This corpus has no morphological tagging. Glosses are matched by word form against a dictionary — a match does not prove it is the same word (an inflected form can coincide with another word’s lemma). Verify against the original and a specialist lexicon where precision matters.
ℹ️ The Chinese and English alongside are this site's own translation, made directly from the original text on this page (not the CUV or the WEB, which follow the Masoretic Text and a different textual tradition).
3:1
IAM cantum illa finiuerat, cum me audiendi auidum stupentemque arrectis adnue auribus carminis mulcedo defixerat. Itaque paulo post: O inquam, summum lassorum solamen animorum quam tu me uel sententiarum pondere uel canendi etiam iucunditate refouisti! Adeo ut iam me post haec inparem fortunae ictibus esse non arbitrer. Itaque remedia quae paulo acriora esse dicebas, non modo non per-horresco, sed audiendi auidus uehementer efflagito. Tum illa Sensi, inquit, cum uerba nostra tacitus attentusque rapiebas, eumque tuae mentis habitum uel exspectaui uel, quod est uerius, ipsa perfeci. Talia sunt quippe quae restant, ut degustata quidem mordeant, interius autem recepta dulcescant. Sed quod tu te audiendi cupidum dicis, quanto ardore flagrares, si quonam te ducere aggrediamur agnosceres! Quonam? inquam.
Now she had finished her song, when the sweetness of the strain held me fixed, eager and astonished to listen, my ears pricked up. And so a little later I said: «O supreme solace of weary souls, how greatly have you refreshed me, both by the weight of your sentiments and by the very delight of your singing! So much so that I now think myself no longer unequal to the blows of Fortune. Therefore those remedies which you said were somewhat sharper I not only do not dread, but, eager to hear, I vehemently demand them.» Then she said: «I felt it, when silent and attentive you were drinking in our words, and I either awaited this disposition of your mind, or — which is truer — myself produced it. For such are the things that remain, that, when tasted, they indeed bite, but, received within, grow sweet. But as for your saying that you are eager to hear, with what ardor would you burn, if you knew whither we are setting out to lead you!» «Whither?» said I.
她剛唱完歌,那曲調的甜美便使我凝定,渴望而驚奇地側耳傾聽。於是過了一會兒我說:「困倦心靈至高的安慰啊,你既以你思想的分量,又以你歌唱本身的喜悅,何等大地使我重新得力!以致我如今認為自己再也不是命運打擊所敵不過的了。因此,你說那較為猛烈些的醫治,我不但不畏懼,反倒渴望聆聽,極力求取。」於是她說:「當你沉默專注地吸收我們的話語時,我便察覺了;你心靈的這種狀態,我或是期待著,或——更確切地說——是我親自造成的。因為那餘下的事物正是這樣:嚐起來固然苦澀,但領受到裡面,卻變為甘甜。然而你既說自己渴望聆聽,你若知道我們正著手要把你引往何處,你必更加熱切如火地燃燒!」我說:「往何處?」
3:2
Ad ueram, inquit, felicitatem, quam tuus quoque somniat animus, sed occupato ad imagines uisu ipsam illam non potest intueri. Tum ego: Fac obsecro et quae illa uera sit, sine cunctatione demonstra. Faciam, inquit illa, tui causa libenter. Sed quae tibi causa notior est, eam prius designare uerbis atque informare conabor ut ea perspecta cum in contrariam partem flexeris oculos, uerae beatitudinis speciem possis agnoscere. Qui serere ingenuum uolet agrum, Liberat arua prius fruticibus, Falce rubos filicemque resecat, Vt noua fruge grauis Ceres eat. Dulcior est apium mage labor, Si malus ora prius sapor edat. Gratius astra nitent ubi Notus Desinit imbriferos dare sonos. Lucifer ut tenebras pepulerit Pulchra dies roseos agit equos. Tu quoque falsa tuens bona prius Incipe colla iugo retrahere. Vera dehinc animum subierint.
«To true happiness,» she said, «which your spirit too dreams of, but, with its sight occupied by images, cannot behold that happiness itself.» Then I: «Do it, I beseech you, and show me without delay what that true happiness is.» «I will do so gladly,» said she, «for your sake. But the cause that is better known to you I will first try to mark out in words and to give form to, so that, when you have surveyed it and turned your eyes to the opposite side, you may be able to recognize the appearance of true blessedness. He who would sow a free-born field first clears the ground of brushwood, cuts down the brambles and the bracken with his sickle, that Ceres may go heavy with new grain. The bees' labor is the more sweet, if first a bad taste assail the mouth. The stars shine more pleasingly when the South Wind ceases to give rain-bearing sounds. As the Morning-Star drives away the shadows, the lovely day urges on its rosy steeds. You too, having gazed first on false goods, begin to draw your neck back from the yoke. Then true goods shall enter your mind.»
她說:「往真正的幸福,那也是你的心靈所夢想的,只是你的視覺被諸般幻象佔據,無法觀看那幸福本身。」於是我說:「求你這樣行,毫不遲延地向我顯明那真幸福是甚麼。」她說:「我願為你的緣故樂意這樣行。但那較為你所熟知的緣由,我要先設法用言語勾勒、賦予形狀,好叫你察看了它、把眼目轉向相反的一面時,能認出真福樂的樣式。凡要播種一塊自由田地的人,必先清除地上的灌木叢,用鐮刀砍倒荊棘與羊齒,好叫刻瑞斯帶著新穀沉甸甸地前行。蜜蜂的勞作更為甘甜,若先有苦味侵襲口舌。當南風止息那帶雨的聲響時,群星照耀得更為悅人。當晨星驅散黑暗時,美麗的白晝驅趕牠玫瑰色的駿馬。你也當如此:先注視了虛假的美善,便開始從軛下抽回頸項。其後真美善才會進入你的心思。」
3:3
Tum defixo paululum uisu et uelut in augustam suae mentis sedem recepta sic coepit: Omnis mortalium cura quam multiplicium studiorum labor exercet, diuerso quidem calle procedit, sed ad unum tamen beatitudinis finem nititur peruenire. Id autem est bonum quo quis adepto nihil ulterius desiderare queat. Quod quidem est omnium summum bonorum cunctaque intra se bona continens, cui si quid aforet summum esse non posset, quoniam relinqueretur extrinsecus quod posset optari. Liquet igitur esse beatitudinem statum bonorum omnium congregatione perfectum. Hunc, uti diximus, diuerso tramite mortales omnes conantur adipisci. Est enim mentibus hominum ueri boni naturaliter inserta cupiditas, sed ad falsa deuius error abducit.
Then, with her gaze fixed a little and as if withdrawn into the august seat of her mind, she thus began: «Every care of mortals, which the toil of manifold pursuits exercises, proceeds indeed by a different path, yet strives to arrive at one same end of blessedness. And that is the good, which, once obtained, allows one to desire nothing further. This indeed is the highest of all goods and contains within itself all goods; for if anything were lacking to it, it could not be the highest, since something would be left outside that could be wished for. It is plain therefore that blessedness is a state made perfect by the gathering together of all goods. This, as we have said, all mortals try by a different track to attain. For there is implanted by nature in the minds of men a desire for the true good, but error, leading astray, draws them off to false goods.
於是,她目光凝定片刻,彷彿退入她心靈那莊嚴的居所,這樣開始說:「凡人一切的掛慮,就是那由多種追求的勞苦所驅使的,固然沿著不同的路徑前進,卻都竭力要抵達同一個福樂的終點。而那便是善,就是人一旦得著,便再無所求的善。這確實是萬善中至高的善,並在自身之內包含一切的善;因為若有甚麼是它所缺乏的,它便不能是至高的,既然會有甚麼留在外面、仍可被渴求。所以顯然,福樂乃是一種藉著萬善的聚集而成全的狀態。正如我們所說,眾凡人都試圖循著不同的途徑去得著它。因為在人的心思裡,本性中植入了對真善的渴望,但那引人迷途的錯誤,卻把人引離到虛假的善上。
3:4
Quorum quidem alii summum bonum esse nihilo indigere credentes ut diuitiis affluant elaborant; alii uero bonum quod sit dignissimum ueneratione iudicantes adeptis honoribus reuerendi ciuibus suis esse nituntur. Sunt qui summum bonum in summa potentia esse constituat; hi uel regnare ipsi uolunt uel regnantibus adhaerere conantur. At quibus optimum quiddam claritas uidetur, hi uel belli uel pacis artibus gloriosum nomen propagare festinant. Plurimi uero boni fructum gaudio laetitiaque metiuntur; zahi felicissimum putant uoluptate diffluere. Sunt etiam qui horum fines causasque alterutro permutent, ut qui diuitias ob potentiam uoluptatesque desiderant uel qui potentiam seu pecuniae causa seu proferendi nominis appetunt.
Of these, some, believing the highest good to be to want for nothing, labor to abound in riches; others, judging that to be good which is most worthy of veneration, strive, by honors gained, to be reverenced by their fellow-citizens. There are those who set the highest good in the highest power; these either wish to reign themselves, or try to attach themselves to those who reign. But to those to whom renown seems something best, these hasten, by the arts of war or of peace, to spread abroad a glorious name. Very many, however, measure the fruit of good by joy and gladness; these think it most happy to flow away in pleasure. There are also those who interchange the ends and causes of these things one for another, as those who desire riches for the sake of power and pleasures, or those who seek power either for money's sake or for the sake of spreading their name.
這些人中,有的以為至善就是無所匱乏,便勞力要在財富上豐足;又有的判定那最值得敬重的才是善,便竭力藉著所得的尊榮,叫同邦的人敬重自己。有的把至善定在最高的權能上;這些人或是自己想要掌權,或是設法依附掌權的人。但對那些以名望為最美之事的人,這些人便藉著戰爭或和平的技藝,急切要傳揚榮耀的名聲。然而極多的人,卻以歡樂喜悅來衡量善的果效;這些人以沉溺於享樂為最幸福的事。也有人把這些事的目的與緣由彼此互換,如那為著權能與享樂而渴望財富的人,或那或為錢財、或為傳揚名聲而追求權能的人。
3:5
In his igitur ceterisque talibus humanorum actuum uotorumque uersatur intentio, ueluti nobilitas fauorque popularis quae uidentur quandam claritudinem comparare, uxor ac liberi quae iucunditatis gratia petuntur; amicorum uero quod sanctissimum quidem genus est, non in fortuna sed in uirtute numeratur, reliquum uero uel potentiae causa uel delectationis assumitur. Iam uero corporis bona promptum est ut ad superiora referantur. Robur enim magnitudoque uidetur praestare ualentiam, pulchritudo atque uelocitas celebritatem, salubritas uoluptatem; quibus omnibus solam beatitudinem desiderari liquet. Nam quod quisque prae ceteris petit, id summum esse iudicat bonum. Sed summum bonum beatitudinem esse definiuimus; quare beatum esse iudicat statum quem prae ceteris quisque desiderat.
In these things, then, and in others like them, is engaged the aim of human actions and desires — such as noble birth and popular favor, which seem to procure a certain renown; a wife and children, which are sought for the sake of pleasantness; but the kind of friends which is indeed most holy is reckoned not in fortune but in virtue, while the rest is taken up either for the sake of power or of delight. Now as for the goods of the body, it is easy to refer them to the things above. For strength and stature seem to confer might, beauty and swiftness fame, soundness of health pleasure; and by all these it is plain that blessedness alone is desired. For what each man seeks before all others, that he judges to be the highest good. But we have defined the highest good to be blessedness; wherefore each man judges that state to be blessed which he desires before all others.
因此,人的行為與願望的目標,就轉動在這些事及其他類似的事上——例如高貴的出身與民眾的擁戴,似乎能博得某種名望;妻子與兒女,是為著歡愉的緣故而尋求的;至於朋友,那確實是最神聖的一類,卻不算在運氣之中,乃算在德行之內,而其餘的則或為權能、或為享受的緣故而被取用。再說身體的諸般好處,很容易將它們歸於上述之事。因為氣力與身量似乎賜下強壯,美貌與敏捷賜下聲名,健康賜下歡樂;由這一切顯然可見,人所渴望的唯獨是福樂。因為各人所優先尋求的,他便判定那是至善。但我們已界定至善就是福樂;所以各人都判定他所優先渴望的那狀態為有福。
3:6
Habes igitur ante oculos propositam fere formam felicitatis humanae—opes, honores, potentiam, gloriam, uoluptates. Quae quidem sola considerans Epicurus consequenter sibi summum bonum uoluptatem esse constituit, quod cetera omnia iucunditatem animo uideantur afferre. Sed ad hominum studia reuertor, quorum animus etsi caligante memoria tamen bonum suum repetit, sed uelut ebrius domum quo tramite reuertatur ignorat. Num enim uidentur errare hi qui nihilo indigere nituntur? Atqui non est aliud quod aeque perficere beatitudinem possit quam copiosus bonorum omnium status nec alieni egens sed sibi ipse sufficiens. Num uero labuntur hi qui quod sit optimum, id etiam reuerentiae cultu dignissimum putent? Minime. Neque enim uile quiddam contemnendumque est quod adipisci omnium fere mortalium laborat intentio.
You have, then, set before your eyes virtually the whole form of human happiness — wealth, honors, power, glory, pleasures. Considering these alone, Epicurus consequently established for himself that the highest good is pleasure, because all the rest seem to bring delight to the mind. But I return to the pursuits of men, whose mind, even though with darkened memory, nevertheless seeks again its own good, but, like a drunken man, knows not by what path it may return home. Do those, then, seem to err who strive to want for nothing? But there is nothing else that can equally perfect blessedness as a copious state of all goods, neither needing what is another's nor sufficient to itself. Do those, then, go astray who think that what is best is also most worthy of the cult of reverence? By no means. For neither is it anything vile and to be despised which the aim of nearly all mortals labors to attain.
你既已把人類幸福的整個樣式,幾乎都擺在眼前了——財富、尊榮、權能、榮耀、享樂。伊壁鳩魯單單考量這些,便相應地為自己定立至善就是享樂,因為其餘一切似乎都給心思帶來歡愉。但我回到人的諸般追求;他們的心思雖記憶昏暗,卻仍尋求自己的善,只是像醉漢一般,不知該循哪條路返回家中。那麼,那些竭力要無所匱乏的人,似乎是錯了嗎?但沒有別的甚麼能像那豐盛、不缺一切善、既不需要別人之物、又自足的狀態那樣,同等地成全福樂。那麼,那些以為至美之物也最值得敬重崇拜的人,是走差了嗎?絕不是。因為幾乎眾凡人的目標都竭力要得著的,絕非甚麼卑賤可鄙之物。
3:7
An in bonis non est numeranda potentia? Quid igitur? Num imbecillum ac sine uiribus aestimandum est, quod omnibus rebus constat esse praestantius? An claritudo nihili pendenda est? Sed sequestrari nequit quin omne quod excellentissimum sit id etiam uideatur esse clarissimum. Nam non esse anxiam tristemque beatitudinem nec doloribus molestiisque subiectam quid attinet dicere, quando in minimis quoque rebus id appetitur quod habere fruique delectet? Atqui haec sunt quae adipisci homines uolunt eaque de causa diuitias, dignitates, regna, gloriam uoluptatesque desiderant quod per haec sibi sufficientiam, reuerentiam, potentiam, celebritatem, laetitiam credunt esse uenturam.
Or is power not to be reckoned among goods? What then? Is that to be esteemed feeble and without strength which is agreed to be more excellent than all things? Or is renown to be counted as nothing? But it cannot be set aside but that whatever is most excellent should also seem to be most renowned. For what need is there to say that blessedness is not anxious and sorrowful, nor subject to griefs and troubles, when even in the smallest matters that is sought which it delights to have and to enjoy? And yet these are the things which men wish to attain, and for this cause they desire riches, dignities, kingdoms, glory, and pleasures — because through these they believe sufficiency, reverence, power, fame, and gladness will come to them.
或者,權能不該算在諸善之中嗎?那又怎樣?凡公認為勝過萬物之物,難道該被視為軟弱無力嗎?又或者,名望該被當作無物嗎?但無法否認,凡至為卓越之物,也必顯為至有名望。再說,福樂並非焦慮憂愁、並非屈服於愁苦煩擾之下,這又何須贅言?既然連在最微小的事上,人所尋求的也是那擁有並享受起來令人喜悅的。然而這些正是人所願得著的,並為此緣故渴望財富、尊位、王權、榮耀與享樂——因為他們相信,藉著這些,自足、敬重、權能、聲名、喜樂便會臨到他們。
3:8
Bonum est igitur quod tam diuersis studiis homines petunt; in quo quanta sit naturae uis facile monstratur, cum licet uariae dissidentesque sententiae tamen in diligendo boni fine consentiunt. Quantas rerum flectat habenas Natura potens, quibus inmensum Legibus orbem prouida seruet Stringatque ligans inresoluto Singula nexu, placet arguto Fidibus lentis promere cantu. Quamuis Poeni pulchra leones Vincula gestent manibusque datas Cantent escas metuantque trucem Soliti uerbera, ferre magistrum. Si cruor horrida tinxerit ora, Resides olim redeunt animi Fremituque graui meminere sui; Laxant nodis colla solutis Primusque lacer dente cruento Domitor rabidas imbuit iras. Quae canit altis garrula ramis Ales caueae clauditur antro;
Good, then, is that which men seek by pursuits so diverse; in which it is easily shown how great is the force of nature, since, although their opinions are various and conflicting, yet in loving the end of good they agree. How great are the reins by which Nature, mighty, bends things; by what laws she, provident, keeps the immense world and, binding, fastens single things in an indissoluble bond — this it pleases me to set forth in clear-toned song upon the supple strings. Though the Punic lions wear lovely chains and eat the food given by hands, and fawn, and fear their stern master, accustomed to bear the lash — if blood once stain their dreadful jaws, their long-dormant spirits return, and with deep roaring they remember themselves; they loosen the bands from their unbound necks, and the tamer, first torn by a bloody tooth, sates his raging wrath. The garrulous bird that sings on the high branches is shut up in the cave of a cage;
因此,善便是人藉著如此分歧的追求所尋求的;在這事上很容易顯明本性的能力何等之大,因為他們的意見雖然紛紜相左,但在愛慕善的終點上卻彼此相合。本性大有能力,用何等的韁繩使萬物彎曲;她滿有先見,憑何等的律法護衛這浩瀚的世界,並以不可解的繫結把個別之物束緊——我樂意在柔韌的弦上,用清亮的歌調把這事陳明出來。布匿的獅子雖戴著華美的鎖鏈,吃著人手所遞的食物,搖尾諂媚,懼怕慣於鞭打牠們的嚴厲主人——但血一旦染紅了牠們可怖的口,那久已沉睡的兇性便回來了,牠們以低沉的吼聲想起了自己;牠們從鬆開的頸項上掙脫綁索,那馴獸者最先被染血的牙撕裂,獅子便滿足了牠暴怒的怒火。那在高枝上歌唱、喋喋不休的鳥被關進籠中的洞穴;
3:9
Huic licet inlita pocula melle Largasque dapes dulci studio Ludens hominum cura ministret, Si tamen arto saliens texto Nemorum gratas uiderit umbras, Sparsas pedibus proterit escas, Siluas tantum maesta requirit, Siluas dulci uoce susurrat. Validis quondam uiribus acta Pronum flectit uirga cacumen; Hanc si curuans dextra remisit, Recto spectat uertice caelum. Cadit Hesperias Phoebus in undas, Sed secreto tramite rursus Currum solitos uertit ad ortus. Repetunt proprios quaeque recursus Redituque suo singula gaudent Nec manet ulli traditus ordo Nisi quod fini iunxerit ortum Stabilemque sui fecerit orbem.
Though playful human care, with sweet zeal, minister to it cups smeared with honey and lavish feasts, yet if, leaping within its narrow lattice, it has seen the pleasant shades of the woods, it tramples underfoot the scattered food, sorrowful it longs only for the forests, only for the forests it murmurs with sweet voice. The sapling, once driven down by strong force, bends its top to the ground; but if the bending right hand has let it go, with upright crown it looks at the sky. Phoebus sinks into the Hesperian waves, but by a secret track again turns his chariot back to its accustomed risings. All things repeat their own returns, and each rejoices in its own coming-back, nor does any settled order abide for any thing, save that which joins the beginning to the end and has made its own course stable.
縱然嬉戲的人以甜美的熱忱,給牠端上塗了蜜的杯與豐盛的筵席,但若牠在狹窄的籠柵內跳躍時,看見了林木宜人的蔭涼,便把撒下的食物踐踏在腳下,憂傷地只渴慕那森林,只用甜美的聲音為那森林低吟。樹苗一旦被強力壓下,便把樹梢彎向地面;但若那彎曲它的右手放開了,它便以挺直的樹冠仰望天空。福玻斯沉入西方的波濤,卻循著隱秘的途徑再把他的車駕轉回慣常的東升。萬物都重複自己的回歸,各物都因自己的返回而歡欣,沒有甚麼被定下不變的次序,除非那把始與終相連、使自己的軌道穩定的。
3:10
Vos quoque, o terrena animalia, tenui licet imagine uestrum tamen principium somniatis uerumque illum beatitudinis finem licet minime perspicaci qualicumque tamen cogitatione prospicitis eoque uos et ad uerum bonum naturalis ducit intentio et ab eodem multiplex error abducit. Considera namque an per ea quibus se homines adepturos beatitudinem putant ad destinatum finem ualeant peruenire. Si enim uel pecuniae uel honores ceteraque tale quid afferunt cui nihil honorum abesse uideatur, nos quoque fateamur fieri aliquos horum adeptione felices. Quod si neque id ualent efficere quod promittunt bonisque pluribus carent, nonne liquido falsa in eis beatitudinis species deprehenditur? Primum igitur te ipsum qui paulo ante diuitiis affluebas, interrogo:
You too, O earthly creatures, though with a thin image, yet dream of your own beginning, and that true end of blessedness, though with a vision in no way clear-sighted, you yet foresee with some sort of thinking; and therefore the natural aim leads you toward the true good, and manifold error draws you away from that same. For consider whether, through those things by which men think they will obtain blessedness, they are able to arrive at the destined end. For if either money or honors or the rest of such things bring something to which nothing of goods seems lacking, let us too confess that some are made happy by the attainment of these. But if they can neither effect what they promise and lack many goods, is not the false appearance of blessedness in them plainly detected? First, then, I question you yourself, who a little before were flowing with riches:
你們也是這樣,屬地的活物啊,你們雖只憑微弱的影像,卻仍夢想著自己的起源,並用某種——雖毫不明察的——思慮預見那真正的福樂終點;因此那本性的目標引你們趨向真善,而那多端的錯誤又把你們從同一者引離。你且思想:藉著那些人以為能得著福樂的事物,他們是否能抵達所定的終點。因為,倘若金錢、尊榮或其餘這類之物,能帶來某種叫人覺得毫不缺乏諸善之物,那麼我們也承認有人因得著這些而成為幸福。但若它們既不能成就所應許的,又缺少許多善,那麼其中虛假的福樂外貌豈不顯然被察覺出來嗎?那麼,我先問你自己,就是不久前還在財富中豐溢的你:
3:11
Inter illas abundantissimas opes numquamne animum tuum concepta ex qualibet iniuria confudit anxietas? Atqui, inquam, libero me fuisse animo quin aliquid semper augerer reminisci non queo. Nonne quia uel aberat quod abesse non uelles uel aderat quod adesse noluisses? Ita est, inquam. Illius igitur praesentiam huius absentiam desiderabis? Confiteor, inquam. Eget uero, inquit, eo quod quisque desiderat? Eget, inquam. Qui uero eget aliquo, non est usquequaque sibi ipse sufficiens? Minime, inquam. Tu itaque hanc insufficientiam plenus, inquit, opibus sustinebas? Quidni? inquam. Opes igitur nihilo indigentem sufficientemque sibi facere nequeunt et hoc erat quod promittere uidebantur. Atqui hoc quoque maxime considerandum puto quod nihil habeat suapte natura pecunia ut his a quibus possidetur inuitis nequeat auferri. Fateor, inquam.
Amid those most abundant riches, did anxiety, conceived from some injury or other, never trouble your mind?» «Indeed,» said I, «I cannot recall having been so free in mind that I was not always troubled by something.» «Was it not because either something was absent which you would not have absent, or something was present which you would not have wished present?» «It is so,» said I. «Then you will long for the presence of the one, the absence of the other?» «I confess it,» said I. «But does a man lack that which he desires?» «He lacks it,» said I. «But he who lacks anything is not in every respect sufficient to himself?» «By no means,» said I. «So you, full of riches, endured this insufficiency?» «Why not?» said I. «Riches, then, cannot make a man want for nothing and sufficient to himself — and this was what they seemed to promise. But this too I think most worthy of consideration, that money has nothing of its own nature whereby it cannot be taken from those who possess it against their will.» «I confess it,» said I.
「在那極豐盈的財富之中,從哪一樁傷害所生出的焦慮,可曾不曾攪擾你的心思呢?」我說:「我實在無法記起自己心靈曾如此自由,以致沒有甚麼總在攪擾我。」「豈不是因為,或是你所不願缺的缺了,或是你所不願有的有了麼?」我說:「正是這樣。」「那麼你必渴望前者的同在、後者的離去囉?」我說:「我承認。」「但人所渴望的,他豈是缺乏的麼?」我說:「他是缺乏的。」「但凡缺乏甚麼的人,豈不就在各方面都不自足麼?」我說:「絕非自足。」「那麼你雖滿有財富,卻忍受著這種不自足囉?」我說:「怎能不是呢?」「那麼財富既不能使人無所匱乏、自給自足——而這原是它們似乎所應許的。但這一點我也認為最該思量:金錢本性中毫無甚麼,能叫它不被人違其意願地從擁有它的人手中奪去。」我說:「我承認。」
3:12
Quidni fateare, cum eam cotidie ualentior aliquis eripiat inuito? Vnde enim forenses querimoniae nisi quod uel ui uel fraude nolentibus pecuniae repetuntur ereptae? Ita est, inquam. Egebit igitur, inquit, extrinsecus petito praesidio quo suam pecuniam quisque tueatur? Quis id, inquam, neget? Atqui non egeret eo, nisi possideret pecuniam quam posset amittere? Dubitari, inquam, nequit. In contrarium igitur relapsa res est; nam quae sufficientes sibi facere putabantur opes, alieno potius praesidio faciunt indigentes. Quis autem modus est quo pellatur diuitiis indigentia? Num enim diuites esurire nequeunt? Num sitire non possunt? Num frigus hibernum pecuniosorum membra non sentiunt? Sed adest, inquies, opulentis quo famem satient, quo sitim frigusque depellant.
«Why should you not confess it, when daily someone more powerful snatches it from the unwilling? For whence come the complaints of the law-courts, except that money, taken away by force or fraud from the unwilling, is sought back? It is so,» said I. «So a man will need help sought from outside, whereby each may guard his money?» «Who,» said I, «would deny it?» «But he would not need it, unless he possessed money which he could lose?» «It cannot be doubted,» said I. «The matter, then, has slipped into its contrary; for the riches which were thought to make men sufficient to themselves rather make them in need of another's protection. But what manner is there by which want is driven off by riches? Can the rich, then, not go hungry? Can they not thirst? Do the limbs of the wealthy not feel the winter's cold? But, you will say, the opulent have wherewith to satisfy hunger, wherewith to drive off thirst and cold.»
「你怎能不承認呢?既然每日都有更強有力的人從不情願的人手中把它奪去。法庭的控訴從何而來,豈不是因為錢財被人以暴力或詭詐從不情願的人手中奪去,如今追討麼?」我說:「正是這樣。」「那麼,人必需要從外面尋來的庇護,好叫各人能守護自己的錢財囉?」我說:「誰能否認呢?」「但他若不是擁有可能失去的錢財,便不會需要這庇護囉?」我說:「這是無可置疑的。」「那麼事情就滑入了它的反面;因為那被以為能使人自足的財富,反倒使人需要別人的庇護。但有甚麼方法能藉財富驅走匱乏呢?富人豈不也會飢餓麼?豈不也會口渴麼?有錢之人的肢體豈感覺不到冬日的寒冷麼?但你會說,富足的人有東西可充飢、有東西可解渴禦寒。」
3:13
Sed hoc modo consolari quidem diuitiis indigentia potest, auferri penitus non potest. Nam si haec hians semper atque aliquid poscens opibus expietur, maneat necesse est quae possit expleri. Taceo quod naturae minimum, quod auantiae nihil satis est. Quare si opes nec submouere possunt indigentiam et ipsae suam faciunt, quid est quod eas sufficientiam praestare credatis? Quamuis fluente diues auri gurgite Non expleturas cogat auarus opes Oneretque bacis colla rubri litoris Ruraque centeno scindat opima boue, Nec cura mordax deseret superstitem, Defunctumque leues non comitantur opes. Sed dignitates honorabilem reuerendumque cui prouenerint reddunt. Num uis ea est magistratibus ut utentium mentibus uirtutes inserant uitia de- pellant?
«But in this way want can indeed be consoled by riches, but cannot be wholly taken away. For if this want, ever gaping and demanding something, be filled up with riches, there must needs remain a want that can be filled. I say nothing of how very little suffices for nature, while for avarice nothing is enough. Wherefore, if riches can neither remove want and themselves produce their own want, what reason is there that you should believe them to bestow sufficiency? Though the rich man with flowing flood of gold heap up wealth that will never fill his greed, and load his neck with pearls of the Red Sea's shore, and cleave his fertile fields with a hundred oxen, yet gnawing care will not desert him while he lives, and when he is dead, his fickle riches will not accompany him. But dignities make him honorable and reverend to whom they fall. Is there in magistracies such power that they implant virtues in the minds of those who hold them, and drive out vices?»
「但這樣,匱乏固然能藉財富得安慰,卻不能被完全除去。因為這匱乏既總是張著口、索求著甚麼,若要用財富填滿它,就必然存留著可被填滿的匱乏。我且不提:本性所需的極少,而貪婪卻甚麼都不夠。所以,財富既不能除去匱乏,自身又造出匱乏,那你們有甚麼理由相信它們能賜下自足呢?富人縱然以流動的黃金洪流堆積那永填不滿其貪婪的財寶,又用紅海岸的珍珠壓墜頸項,用百頭牛耕開肥沃的田地,那啃齧的掛慮仍不離棄在世的他,等他死了,他那善變的財富也不與他同往。但尊位卻使所臨到的人尊貴可敬。難道官職中有這樣的能力,能在掌權者的心思裡植入德行、趕出惡行麼?」
3:14
Atqui non fugare sed illustrare potius nequitiam solent; quo fit ut indignemur eas saepe nequissimis hominibus contigisse, unde Catullus licet in curuli Nonium sedentem strumam tamen appellat. Videsne quantum malis dedecus adiciant dignitates? Atqui minus eorum patebit indignitas, si nullis honoribus inclarescant. Tu quoque num tandem tot periculis adduci potuisti ut cum Decorato gerere magistratum putares, cum in eo mentem nequissimi scurrae delatorisque respiceres? Non enim possumus ob honores reuerentia dignos iudicare quos ipsis honoribus iudicamus indignos. At si quem sapientia praeditum uideres, num posses eum uel reuerentia uel ea qua est praeditus sapientia non dignum putare? Minime. Inest enim dignitas propria uirtuti, quam protinus in eos quibus fuerit adiuncta transfundit.
«And yet they are wont not to dispel wickedness but rather to make it conspicuous; whence it comes about that we are indignant that they have often fallen to the most worthless of men, whence Catullus calls Nonius a tumor, though seated in the curule chair. Do you see how great a disgrace dignities add to the wicked? And yet their unworthiness would be less manifest if they did not grow famous through any honors. As for you, were you at last able, by so many perils, to think you held a magistracy together with Decoratus, when in him you beheld the mind of a most worthless buffoon and informer? For we cannot, on account of honors, judge worthy of reverence those whom we judge unworthy of the honors themselves. But if you saw someone endowed with wisdom, could you think him unworthy either of reverence or of that wisdom with which he is endowed? By no means. For there is a dignity proper to virtue, which it forthwith pours into those to whom it has been joined.»
「然而它們慣常並不驅散邪惡,反倒使之顯眼;由此我們便憤慨:它們竟常落到最卑劣之人身上,因此卡圖盧斯雖見諾尼烏斯坐在執政官的象牙椅上,仍稱他為一個腫瘤。你是否看見尊位給惡人添上何等大的羞辱?再說,他們的卑劣若不因任何尊榮而出名,反倒不那麼顯著。至於你,你豈竟能歷盡那麼多危難,仍以為自己是與得科拉圖斯同任官職,當你在他身上看見一個最卑劣的小丑與告密者的心思時?因為我們不能因尊榮的緣故,就判定那些我們判為不配得尊榮本身的人為配受敬重。但你若看見一個有智慧的人,你豈能認為他不配受敬重,或不配得他所有的那智慧麼?絕不能。因為有一種尊貴是德行所固有的,它立即把這尊貴傾注給所結連之人。」
3:15
Quod quia populares facere nequeunt honores, liquet eos propriam dignitatis pulchritudinem non habere. In quo illud est animaduertendum magis. Nam si eo abiectior est quo magis a pluribus quisque contemnitur, cum reuerendos facere nequeat quos pluribus ostentat, despectiores potius improbos dignitas facit. Verum non impune; reddunt namque improbi parem dignitatibus uicem quas sua contagione commaculant. Atque ut agnoscas ueram illam reuerentiam per has umbratiles dignitates non posse confingere, si qui multiplici consulatu functus in barbaras nationes forte deuenerit, uenerandumne barbaris honor faciet?
«Because popular honors cannot do this, it is plain that they have not the proper beauty of dignity. In which this is the more to be observed. For if a man is the more abject the more he is despised by the many, since dignity cannot make reverend those whom it exhibits to many, it rather makes the wicked more despicable. But not with impunity; for the wicked pay back to dignities an equal return, since by their own contagion they stain them. And that you may recognize that true reverence cannot be feigned through these shadowy dignities — if someone who has discharged a manifold consulship should chance to come among barbarous nations, will his honor make him venerable to the barbarians?»
「民間的尊榮既不能成就這事,顯然它們並無尊貴所固有的那美麗。在這事上更該留意這一點。因為若一個人越被眾人藐視就越卑賤,那麼尊位既不能使它向眾人陳列的人成為可敬,反倒使惡人更為可鄙。然而並非無代價的;因為惡人以同等的回報還給尊位,他們用自己的污染玷污了尊位。又為叫你認清:真正的敬重不能藉這些虛影般的尊位假造出來——倘若有人曾多次擔任執政官,偶然來到野蠻民族之中,他的尊榮豈會使他在野蠻人眼中成為可敬麼?」
3:16
Atqui si hoc naturale munus dignitatibus foret, ab officio suo quoquo gentium nullo modo cessarent, sicut ignis ubique terrarum numquam tamen calere desistit, sed quoniam id eis non propria uis sed hominum fallax adnectit opinio, uanescunt ilico, cum ad eos uenerint qui dignitates -eas esse non aestimant. Sed hoc apud exteras nationes. Inter eos uero apud quos ortae sunt 3 num perpetuo perdurant? Atqui praetura magna olim potestas nunc inane nomen et senatorii census grauis sarcina; si quis populi quondam curasset annonam, magnus habebatur, nunc ea praefectura quid abiectius? Vt enim paulo ante diximus, quod nihil habet proprii decoris, opinione utentium nunc splendorem accipit nunc amittit.
«And yet, if this were a natural endowment of dignities, they would in no way cease from their office among any nation whatsoever, just as fire never anywhere on earth ceases to be hot; but since it is not their own force, but the deceptive opinion of men, that attaches this to them, they vanish at once, when they come to those who do not esteem these dignities to be such. But this is among foreign nations. Yet among those among whom they arose, do they endure perpetually? And yet the praetorship, once a great power, is now an empty name and a heavy burden of the senatorial census; if anyone had once cared for the people's grain-supply, he was held great; now what is more abject than that prefecture? For, as we said a little before, that which has nothing of its own splendor now receives splendor and now loses it by the opinion of those who use it.»
「再說,倘若這是尊位天生的賦予,那麼它們在任何民族當中都絕不會止息其職分,正如火在地上任何地方都從不止息發熱;但既然不是尊位自己的能力,乃是人虛妄的看法把這賦予它們,那麼一旦來到那些不認這些尊位為尊位的人面前,它們便立刻消散了。但這是在外邦之中。然而在那些它們所興起的人當中,它們豈能永久存留麼?再說,從前是大權的執政官職,如今不過是空名,是元老財產資格的沉重負擔;若有人從前照管過民眾的糧食供應,便被視為偉大,如今那長官之職還有甚麼比它更卑下?因為正如我們不久前所說,凡自身毫無光彩之物,便照使用之人的看法,時而得著光彩,時而失去。」
3:17
Si igitur reuerendos facere nequeunt dignitates, si ultro improborum contagione sordescunt, si mutatione temporum splendere desinunt, si gentium aestimatione uilescunt, quid est quod in se expetendae pulchritudinis habeant, nedum aliis praestent? Quamuis se Tyrio superbus ostro Comeret et niueis lapillis, Inuisus tamen omnibus uigebat Luxuriae Nero saeuientis. Sed quondam dabat improbus uerendis Patribus indecores curules. Quis illos igitur putet beatos Quos miseri tribuunt honores? An uero regna regumque familiaritas efficere potentem ualet? Quidni, quando eorum felicitas perpetuo perdurat? Atqui plena est exemplorum uetustas, plena etiam praesens aetas, qui reges felicitatem calamitate mutaueruit. O praeclara potentia quae ne ad conseruationem quidem sui satis efficax inuenitur!
«If, then, dignities cannot make men reverend, if they grow foul of their own accord by the contagion of the wicked, if they cease to shine with the change of times, if they become cheap in the estimation of nations, what is there in them of beauty to be sought, much less to bestow on others? Though Nero, proud, should adorn himself with Tyrian purple and snowy gems, yet, hateful to all, he flourished in raging luxury. But once the villain gave unbecoming curule chairs to the reverend Fathers. Who, then, would think those blessed whom wretched men confer with honors? But can kingdoms and the friendship of kings make a man powerful? Why not — when their felicity endures perpetually? And yet antiquity is full of examples, the present age too is full, of kings who have changed felicity for calamity. O splendid power, which is not found efficacious even for the preservation of itself!»
「那麼,尊位既不能使人成為可敬,若它們因惡人的污染而自行污穢,若它們隨時代的變遷而不再閃耀,若它們在各民族的評價中變得低賤,那它們本身有甚麼可被尋求的美麗,更何況賜給別人呢?尼祿縱然驕傲地以推羅紫袍與雪白珠寶妝飾自己,他卻為眾人所恨惡,在狂暴的奢華中亨通。但這惡人從前竟把不相稱的執政官象牙椅授給可敬的元老們。那麼,誰會認為那些由卑劣之人所授尊榮的人是有福的呢?但王權和君王的友誼,能使人有權能麼?怎不能呢——既然他們的幸運永久長存?然而古時滿是例證,當今之世也滿是例證,就是那些以災禍換取幸運的君王。權能何等顯赫——它竟連保全自己都不夠有效!」
3:18
Quod si haec regnorum potestas beatitudinis auctor est, nonne si qua parte defuerit, felicitatem minuat, miseriam inportet? Sed quamuis late humana tendantur imperia, plures necesse est gentes relinqui quibus regum quisque non imperet. Qua uero parte beatos faciens desinit potestas, hac inpotentia subintrat quae miseros facit; hoc igitur modo maiorem regibus inesse necesse est miseriae portionem. Expertus sortis suae periculorum tyrannus regni metus pendentis supra uerticem gladii terrore simulauit. Quae est igitur haec potestas quae sollicitudinum morsus expellere, quae formidinum aculeos uitare nequit? Atqui uellent ipsi uixisse securi, sed nequeunt; dehinc de potestate gloriantur. An tu potentem censes quem uideas uelle quod non possit efficere?
«But if this power of kingdoms is the author of blessedness, will it not, if it be lacking in any part, diminish happiness and bring in misery? But however widely human empires be stretched, there must needs be left many nations over which each of the kings does not rule. And in whatever part the power that makes men blessed ceases, in that part there enters the impotence which makes them wretched; in this way, then, there must needs be in kings a greater portion of misery. A tyrant, having experienced the perils of his own lot, figured the fears of kingship by the terror of a sword hanging over his head. What, then, is this power which cannot drive off the gnawings of anxieties, which cannot avoid the stings of fears? And yet they themselves would wish to have lived secure, but cannot; and then they boast of their power. Or do you reckon him powerful whom you see willing what he cannot accomplish?»
「但若王權的這權能是福樂的源頭,那麼它若在某一方面有所欠缺,豈不要減損幸福、帶來苦境麼?然而人的帝國無論延展得多廣,必然留有許多民族,是眾君王中各人都管轄不到的。而在那使人有福的權能止息之處,那使人悲慘的無能便趁隙而入;如此說來,君王身上必然有更大份的悲慘。有一個暴君既經歷了自己處境的危險,便藉著懸在頭頂之劍的恐怖,刻畫出王權的恐懼。那麼,這權能算甚麼呢——它既不能驅除焦慮的啃齧,又不能躲避恐懼的刺針?再說,他們自己原願平安度日,卻不能;於是他們竟以權能自誇。或者,凡你見他想要卻不能成就之人,你還算他有權能麼?」
3:19
Potentem censes qui satellite latus ambit, qui quos terret ipse plus metuit, qui ut potens esse uideatur, in seruientium manu situm est? Nam quid ego de regum familiaribus disseram, cum regna ipsa tantae inbecillitatis plena demonstrem? Quos quidem regia potestas saepe incolumis saepe autem lapsa prosternit. Nero Senecam familiarem praeceptoremque suum ad eligendae mortis coegit arbitrium. Papinianum diu inter aulicos potentem militum gladiis Antoninus obiecit. Atqui uterque potentiae suae renuntiare uoluerunt, quorum Seneca opes etiam suas tradere Neroni seque in otium conferre conatus est; sed dum ruituros moles ipsa trahit, neuter quod uoluit effecit. Quae est igitur ista potentia quam pertimescunt habentes, quam nec cum habere uelis tutus sis et cum deponere cupias uitare non possis.
«Do you reckon him powerful who surrounds his side with a bodyguard, who himself fears more those whom he terrifies, who, that he may seem to be powerful, is placed in the hand of his servants? For why should I discourse of the friends of kings, when I show that the kingdoms themselves are full of so great weakness? These the royal power, sometimes while it stands secure, but sometimes when it has fallen, lays low. Nero compelled Seneca, his friend and teacher, to the choice of his own death. Antoninus exposed Papinian, long powerful among the courtiers, to the swords of the soldiers. And yet both of them wished to renounce their power; of these, Seneca even tried to hand over his own wealth to Nero and to betake himself to leisure; but while the very mass, about to fall, drags them down, neither accomplished what he wished. What, then, is this power which those who have it dread, which you are neither safe in possessing when you would, nor able to avoid when you desire to lay it down?»
「凡用衛兵環護自己身旁的人,凡比所恐嚇之人更懼怕別人的人,凡為要顯為有權能而被置於僕從手中的人,你還算他有權能麼?至於君王的親信,我又何必論說呢?既然我已顯明王權本身也滿是何等大的軟弱。這王權有時在它穩固站立時,有時在它傾倒時,把這些人擊倒。尼祿逼迫他的朋友兼老師塞涅卡選擇自盡。安東尼努斯把長久在朝臣中有權勢的帕皮尼安交給士兵的刀劍。然而二人都曾想要放棄自己的權勢;其中塞涅卡甚至試圖把自己的財富交給尼祿,使自己退隱安閒;但當那將傾的重壓把他們拖下時,二人都未能成就所願。那麼,這權能算甚麼呢——擁有它的人懼怕它,你想擁有它時也不得平安,想卸下它時也躲避不掉?」
3:20
An praesidio sunt amici quos non uirtus sed fortuna conciliat? Sed quem felicitas amicum iecit, intortunium faciet inimicum. Quae uero pestis efficacior ad nocendum quam familiaris inimicus. Qui se uolet esse potentem Animos domet ille feroces Nec uicta libidine colla Foedis submittat habenis. Etenim licet Indica longe Tellus tua iura tremescat Et seruiat ultima Thyle, Tamen atras pellere curas Miserasque fugare querelas Non nosse potentia non est. Gloria uero quam fallax saepe, quam turpis est! Vnde non iniuria tragicus exclamat: ὦ δόξα δόξα μυρίοισι δὴ βροτῶν οὐδὲν γεγῶσι βίοτον ὤγκωσας μέγαν. Plures enim magnum saepe nomen falsis uulgi opinionibus abstulerunt; quo quid turpius excogitari potest? Nam qui falso praedicantur, suis ipsi necesse est laudibus erubescant.
«Are friends a protection whom not virtue but fortune wins? But the man whom prosperity has made a friend, misfortune will make an enemy. And what plague is more efficacious to do harm than a familiar enemy? He who would be powerful, let him tame his fierce passions, nor submit his neck, vanquished by lust, to foul reins. For though the land of India far off should tremble at your laws, and farthest Thule serve you, yet not to know how to drive away black cares and to put wretched complaints to flight — this is not power. But glory, indeed, how often deceptive, how base it is! Whence the tragedian not without reason cries out: «O glory, glory, on countless mortals who are nothing you have heaped a great life!» For many have often carried off a great name by the false opinions of the crowd; than which what more base can be devised? For those who are falsely praised must needs blush at their own praises.»
「那不是德行、乃是運氣所贏得的朋友,能作庇護麼?但順境所造成的朋友,逆境卻要使他成為仇敵。還有甚麼災殃比一個熟識的仇敵更能加害呢?凡想要有權能的人,當馴服他兇暴的情慾,不可使被情慾征服的頸項屈服於可恥的韁繩之下。因為縱然遠方的印度之地在你的律法前戰兢,極遠的圖勒也服事你,但若不知如何驅走黑暗的掛慮、使悲慘的怨歎奔逃——這便不是權能。但榮耀啊,何等屢屢欺人,何等卑劣!因此那悲劇詩人不無理由地呼喊:『榮耀啊,榮耀,你在無數本是虛無的凡人身上堆起了偉大的生命!』因為許多人常憑群眾虛假的看法奪得大名;還有甚麼比這更卑劣的能被想出來呢?因為那些被虛假讚揚的人,勢必為自己所受的讚揚而臉紅。」
3:21
Quae si etiam meritis conquisita sit, quid tamen sapientis adiecerit conscientiae qui bonum suum non populari rumore, sed conscientiae ueritate metitur? Quod si hoc ipsum propagasse nomen pulchrum uidetur, consequens est ut foedum non extendisse iudicetur. Sed cum, uti paulo ante disserui, plures gentes esse necesse sit ad quas unius fama hominis nequeat peruenire, fit ut quem tu aestimas esse gloriosum, pro maxima parte terrarum uideatur inglorius. Inter haec uero popularem gratiam ne commemoratione quidem dignam puto, quae nec iudicio prouenit nec umquam firma perdurat. Iam uero quam sit inane quam futtile nobilitatis nomen, quis non nideat? Quae si ad claritudinem refertur, aliena est. Videtur namque esse nobilitas quaedam de meritis ueniens laus parentum.
«But even if it be acquired by merits, what has it added to the conscience of a wise man, who measures his own good not by popular rumor but by the truth of conscience? But if to have spread this very name seems beautiful, it follows that not to have spread it is judged base. But since, as I argued a little before, there must needs be many nations to which the fame of a single man cannot reach, it comes about that he whom you esteem glorious seems, over the greatest part of the earth, inglorious. Among these things, indeed, I do not think popular favor even worthy of mention, which comes neither by judgment nor ever endures firm. Now too, how empty, how futile is the name of nobility, who does not see? For if it is referred to renown, it is another's. For nobility seems to be a certain praise coming from the merits of parents.»
「但縱然榮耀是憑功績得來的,它對智者的良心又添了甚麼?智者衡量自己的善,不是憑民間的傳言,乃是憑良心的真實。但若傳揚這名聲本身似乎美好,那麼推論起來,不曾傳揚便被判為卑劣。然而正如我不久前所論證的,必然有許多民族是一個人的名聲無法傳到的,於是便有這結果:你以為有榮耀的人,在大地最大的部分中卻顯為無榮耀。在這些事中,我甚至認為民眾的擁戴不值一提,它既非憑判斷而來,也從不堅固存留。再說,貴族之名何等空洞、何等無用,誰看不出來呢?因為它若歸於名望,那名望是別人的。因為貴族的身分,似乎不過是從父祖功績而來的一種讚譽。」
3:22
Quod si claritudinem praedicatio facit, illi sint clari necesse est qui praedicantur. Quare splendidum te, si tuam non habes, aliena claritudo non efficit. Quod si quid est in nobilitate bonum, id esse arbitror solum, ut inposita nobilibus necessitudo uideatur ne a maiorum uirtute degeneret. Omne hominum genus in terris simili surgit ab ortu Vnus enim rerum pater est, unus cuncta ministrat. Ille dedit Phoebo radios dedit et cornua lunae, Ille homines etiam terris dedit ut sidera caelo, Hic clausit membris animos celsa sede petitos. Mortales igitur cunctos edit nobile germen. Quid genus et proauos strepitis? Si primordia uestra Auctoremque deum spectes, nullus degener exstat, Ni uitiis peiora fouens proprium deserat ortum. Quid autem de corporis uoluptatibus loquar, quarum appetentia quidem plena est anxietatis, satietas uero poenitentiae?
«But if it is praise that makes renown, then those must needs be renowned who are praised. Wherefore another's renown does not make you splendid, if you have not your own. But if there is anything good in nobility, I judge it to be this alone: that an obligation seems to be imposed on the noble not to degenerate from the virtue of their forefathers. All the race of men on earth arises from a like origin. For there is one Father of all, one who ministers all things. He gave to Phoebus his rays, gave to the moon her horns; He gave men also to the earth, as stars to the heaven; He shut up in limbs the souls sought from a lofty seat. A noble seed, therefore, brought forth all mortals. Why do you bluster of family and forefathers? If you regard your origins and God your author, no one is base-born, unless, fostering worse things by vices, he forsake his own origin. But what shall I say of the pleasures of the body, the appetite for which is indeed full of anxiety, but the satiety of repentance?»
「但若使人有名望的是讚譽,那麼受讚揚的人才必是有名望的。所以別人的名望不能使你顯赫,若你沒有自己的名望。但貴族中若有甚麼善,我判定唯有這一樣:就是貴族似乎被加上一種義務,叫他們不可背棄祖先的德行而墮落。地上人類全族都從相同的源頭興起。因為萬有有一位父,有一位供應萬物。祂賜給福玻斯光線,賜給月亮她的彎角;祂也把人賜給大地,如同把眾星賜給天空;祂把從崇高之處所尋來的魂囚於肢體之內。所以一個高貴的種子生出了眾凡人。你為何為家世與先祖喧嚷?你若顧念你的起源、並顧念神你的創造者,沒有人是卑賤出身的,除非他以惡行滋養更壞之事,背棄了自己的源頭。但身體的諸般享樂,我又當說甚麼呢?對它的貪慾固然滿是焦慮,而它的飽足卻是懊悔。」
3:23
Quantos illae morbos, quam intolerabiles dolores quasi quendam fructum nequitiae fruentium solent referre corporibus! Quarum motus quid habeat iucunditatis, ignoro. Tristes uero esse uoluptatum exitus, quisquis reminisci libidinum suarum uolet, intelleget. Quae si beatos explicare possunt, nihil causae est quin pecudes quoque beatae esse dicantur quarum omnis ad explendam corporalem lacunam festinat intentio. Honestissima quidem coniugis foret liberorumque iucunditas, sed nimis e natura dictum est nescio quem filios inuenisse tortorem; quorum quam sit mordax quaecumque condicio, neque alias expertum te neque nunc anxium necesse est admonere. In quo Euripidis mei sententiam probo, qui carentem liberis infortunio dixit esse felicem.
«How many diseases, what intolerable pains, as it were a certain fruit of their wickedness, are these pleasures wont to bring back to the bodies of those who enjoy them! What of delight their motions hold, I know not. But that the issues of pleasures are sad, whoever will recall his own lusts will understand. If these can render men blessed, there is no reason why beasts too should not be called blessed, whose every aim hastens to fill up the bodily void. The pleasantness of a wife and children would be most honorable; but it has been said all too truly in accordance with nature that some man or other found his sons to be a torturer. How biting whatever their condition may be, there is no need to admonish you, who have neither experienced it otherwise nor are now anxious about it. In which matter I approve the opinion of my Euripides, who said that a man childless was happy in his misfortune.»
「這些享樂慣常給享受之人的身體,帶回何等多的疾病、何等難忍的疼痛,彷彿是他們邪惡的某種果子!它們的舉動有何歡愉,我並不知道。但凡肯回想自己情慾的人,都會明白享樂的結局是悲哀的。這些若能使人有福,那就沒有理由不稱獸類也是有福的了,因為牠們的一切目標都急於填滿身體的空洞。妻子兒女的歡愉本是極為可敬的;但按本性所說過的,實在太真確了:某個人竟發覺兒女成了折磨者。無論他們的處境如何,這啃齧是何等深,無須提醒你,因為你既不曾在別處經歷過它,如今也不為它焦慮。在這事上,我贊同我那歐里庇得斯的看法,他說無兒女的人在他的不幸中倒是有福的。」
3:24
Habet hoc uoluptas omnis, Stimulis agit fruentes Apiumque par uolantum Vbi grata mella fudit, Fugit et nimis tenaci Ferit icta corda morsu. Nihil igitur dubium est quin hae ad beatitudinem uiae deuia quaedam sint nec perducere quemquam eo ualeant ad quod se perducturas esse promittunt. Quantis uero implicitae malis sint, breuissime monstrabo. Quid enim? Pecuniamne congregare conaberis? Sed eripies habenti. Dignitatibus fulgere uelis? Danti supplicabis et qui praeire ceteros honore cupis, poscendi humilitate uilesces. Potentiamne desideras? Subiectorum insidiis obnoxius periculis subiacebis. Gloriam petas? Sed per aspera quaeque distractus securus esse desistis. Voluptariam uitam degas? Sed quis non spernat atque abiciat uilissimae fragilissimaeque rei corporis seruum?
«This every pleasure has: with goads it drives on those who enjoy it, and, like the flying bees, when it has poured out its pleasant honey, it flees and strikes the smitten hearts with too tenacious a sting. There is no doubt, then, that these ways to blessedness are certain by-paths, nor can they lead anyone to that which they promise they will lead him to. But with how great evils they are entangled, I will show most briefly. What then? Will you try to amass money? But you will snatch it from him who has it. Do you wish to shine with dignities? You will supplicate the giver, and you who desire to precede others in honor will grow cheap by the humility of asking. Do you desire power? You will be subject to the snares of your subjects and exposed to perils. Do you seek glory? But, torn this way and that through every hardship, you cease to be secure. Do you lead a life of pleasure? But who would not scorn and cast off the slave of a most worthless and most fragile thing, the body?»
「每一種享樂都有這特性:它用刺棒驅趕享受它的人,並且像那飛舞的蜜蜂,當它倒出甜美的蜜之後,便逃走,用過於黏纏的螫刺擊打被擊之心。因此毫無疑問,這些通往福樂的道路其實是某些歧途,它們無法把任何人引到所應許要引他去的地方。但它們糾纏著何等大的禍患,我要極其簡略地顯明。那又怎樣呢?你要設法積攢錢財麼?但你必從擁有它的人手中奪取。你願以尊位閃耀麼?你必向授予者乞求,你既想在尊榮上勝過別人,反要因乞討的卑屈而變得低賤。你渴望權能麼?你必受屬下的詭計所害,置身危難之中。你尋求榮耀麼?但你被各樣艱苦扯來扯去,便不再得安穩。你過享樂的生活麼?但誰不藐視、拋棄那最卑賤、最脆弱之物——身體的奴僕呢?」
3:25
Iam uero qui bona prae se corporis ferunt, quam exigua, quam fragili possessione nituntur! Num enim elephantos mole, tauros robore superare potentis, num tigres uelocitate praeibitis? Respicite caeli spatium, firmitudinem, celeritatem et aliquando desinite uilia mirari. Quod quidem caelum non his potius est quam sua qua regitur ratione mirandum. Formae uero nitor ut rapidus est, ut uelox et uernalium florum mutabilitate fugacior! Quod si? ut Aristoteles 1 ait, Lynceis oculis homines uterentur, ut eorum uisus obstantia penetraret, nonne introspectis uisceribus illud Alcibiadis superficie pulcherrimum corpus turpissimum uideretur? Igitur te pulchrum uideri non tua natura sed oculorum spectantium reddit infirmitas. Sed aestimat e quam uultis nimio corporis bona, dum sciatis hoc quodcumque miramini triduanae febris igniculo posse dissolui!
«Now indeed those who set the goods of the body before themselves, on how scanty, how fragile a possession do they rely! For can you surpass the elephants in bulk, the bulls in strength, can you outrun the tigers in swiftness? Look upon the expanse, the firmness, the swiftness of the heaven, and at last cease to marvel at vile things. And indeed that heaven is to be marveled at not so much for these as for the reason by which it is ruled. But the brightness of form, how fleeting it is, how swift, and more fugitive than the changeableness of spring flowers! For if, as Aristotle says, men used the eyes of Lynceus, so that their sight might penetrate things that stand in the way, would not that body of Alcibiades, most beautiful on the surface, seem most foul when the inward parts were looked into? Therefore it is not your own nature, but the weakness of the eyes of beholders, that makes you seem beautiful. But esteem the goods of the body as highly as you will, provided you know that whatever you marvel at can be dissolved by the little fire of a three days' fever!»
「再說,那些把身體的好處擺在自己面前的人,所倚靠的是何等貧乏、何等脆弱的產業!你能在身量上勝過大象、在氣力上勝過公牛、在敏捷上跑過老虎麼?且觀看天的廣袤、堅固、迅疾,總要止住對卑賤之物的驚嘆。而那天確實該被驚嘆,與其說因這些,不如說因治理它的那理性。但形貌的光彩何等短暫,何等迅疾,比春花的善變更加易逝!因為,正如亞里士多德所說,倘若人用林叩斯的眼睛,使他們的視覺能穿透擋路之物,那麼阿爾喀比亞德那表面極美的身體,在察看內臟之後,豈不顯為極醜麼?所以使你顯得美麗的,不是你自己的本性,乃是觀者眼目的軟弱。但你儘可隨意高估身體的好處,只要你知道:凡你所驚嘆的,都能被三日熱病的小火所消解!」
3:26
Ex quibus omnibus illud redigere in summam licet, quod haec quae nec praestare quae polluentur bona possunt nec omnium bonorum congregatione perfecta sunt, ea nec ad beatitudinem quasi quidam calles ferunt nec beatos ipsa perficiunt Eheu quae miseros tramite deuios Abducit ignorantia! Non aurum in uiridi quaeritis arbore Nec uite gemmas carpitis, Non altis laqueos montibus abditis Vt pisce ditetis dapes Nec uobis capreas si libeat sequi, Tyrrhena captatis uada. Ipsos quin etiam fluctibus abditos Norunt recessus aequoris, Quae gemmis niueis unda feracior Vel quae rubentis purpurae Nec non quae tenero pisce uel asperis Praestent echinis litora. Sed quonam lateat quod cupiunt bonum, Nescire caeci sustinent, Et quod stelliferum trans abiit polum, Tellure demersi petunt. Quid dignum stolidis mentibus inprecer? Opes honores ambiant;
«From all which it is permitted to reduce this into a sum: that these things, which can neither bestow the goods they promise nor are perfect by the gathering together of all goods, neither lead to blessedness as it were certain pathways, nor make men blessed of themselves. Alas, what ignorance leads the wretched astray by devious tracks! You do not seek gold on a green tree, nor pluck gems from the vine; you do not hide nets on high mountains, to enrich your feasts with fish; nor, if it please you to hunt the wild goats, do you make for the Tyrrhenian shallows. Nay, men even know the hidden recesses of the sea concealed in the waves — what wave is more fertile in snowy pearls, or in reddening purple; and likewise what shores yield tender fish or rough sea-urchins. But where lies hidden the good they crave, they suffer themselves to be blind and not to know it; and what has passed beyond the star-bearing pole, sunk in the earth, they seek. What worthy thing shall I imprecate upon their stolid minds? Let them strive after wealth and honors;»
「由這一切可以歸結出這總結:這些既不能賜下所應許的善、又非藉萬善的聚集而完全之物,既不像甚麼確實的途徑般引人到福樂,也不能憑自身使人有福。唉,何等的無知藉迂迴的小徑把可憐人引入歧途!你們不在綠樹上尋金,也不從葡萄藤上摘寶石;你們不在高山上藏設網羅,好以魚豐富你們的筵席;若你們樂意追獵野山羊,也不奔向第勒尼安的淺灘。不僅如此,人甚至知曉那隱藏在波濤中的海底幽處——何種波浪更盛產雪白的珍珠,或泛紅的紫色;同樣,何種海岸出產嫩魚或粗糙的海膽。但他們所渴慕的善藏在何處,他們竟甘心瞎眼、不去知道;那已越過繁星之極的,他們卻沉沒在地裡去尋求。我該為他們愚鈍的心思祈求甚麼相稱的事呢?讓他們去追求財富與尊榮罷;」
3:27
Et cum falsa graui mole parauerint, Tum uera cognoscant bona. Hactenus mendacis formam felicitatis ostendisse suffecerit, quam si perspicaciter intueris, ordo est deinceps quae sit uera monstrare. Atqui uideo, inquam, nec opibus sufficicntiam nec regnis potentiam nec reuerentiam dignitatibus nec celebritatem gloria nec laetitiam uoluntatibus posse contingere. An etiam causas, cur id ita sit, deprehendisti? Tenui quidem ueluti rimula mihi uideor intueri, sed ex te apertius cognoscere malim. Atqui promptissima ratio est. Quod enim simplex est indiuisumque natura, id error humanus separat et a uero atque perfecto ad falsum imperfectumque traducit. An tu arbitraris quod nihilo indigeat egere potentia? Minime, inquam. Recte tu quidem. Nam si quid est quod in ulla re inbecillioris ualentiae sit, in hac praesidio necesse est egeat alieno.
«and when with heavy toil they have procured false goods, then let them recognize the true. Thus far it will suffice to have shown the form of lying happiness, which, if you behold clearly, the order is next to show what the true one is.» «And yet I see,» said I, «that neither sufficiency by riches, nor power by kingdoms, nor reverence by dignities, nor fame by glory, nor gladness by pleasures can be attained.» «Have you also grasped the causes why it is so?» «I seem, indeed, to gaze upon them as it were through a thin chink, but I should prefer to learn them more clearly from you.» «And yet the reason is most ready to hand. For that which is simple and undivided by nature, human error separates, and transfers from the true and perfect to the false and imperfect. Do you think that what wants for nothing lacks power?» «By no means,» said I. «Rightly indeed. For if there is anything which in any respect is of weaker strength, in this it must needs lack another's protection.»
「等他們以沉重的勞苦謀得了虛假的善,那時就讓他們認識那真的罷。到此為止,已足以顯明虛謊幸福的樣式了;你若清楚察看它,按次序接下來便是顯明那真幸福是甚麼。」我說:「然而我看見:自足不能藉財富得著,權能不能藉王權得著,敬重不能藉尊位得著,聲名不能藉榮耀得著,喜樂不能藉享樂得著。」「你是否也領會了事情如此的緣由呢?」「我固然彷彿透過一道細縫凝視到它們,但我更願從你那裡更清楚地學得。」「然而那理由是極現成的。因為凡本性簡單、不可分的,人的錯誤卻把它分割,並從真實完全者轉移到虛假不全者。你以為那無所匱乏者會缺乏權能麼?」我說:「絕不會。」「你說得正是。因為若有甚麼在某一方面是力量較弱的,它在這方面便必然缺乏別人的庇護。」
3:28
Ita est, inquam. Igitur sufficientiae potentiaeque una est eademque natura. Sic uidetur. Quod uero huiusmodi sit, spernendumne esse censes an contra rerum omnium ueneratione dignissimum? At hoc, inquam, ne dubitari quidem potest. Addamus igitur sufficientiae potentiaeque reuerentiam, ut haec tria unum esse iudicemus. Addamus, si quidem uera nolumus confiteri. Quid uero, inquit, obscurumne hoc atque ignobile censes esse an omni celebritate clarissimum? Considera uero, ne quod nihilo indigere, quod potentissimum, quod honore dignissimum esse concessum est, egere claritudine quam sibi praestare non possit atque ob id aliqua ex parte uideatur abiectius. Non possum, inquam, quin hoc uti est ita etiam celeberrimum esse confitear. Consequens igitur est ut claritudinem superioribus tribus nihil differre fateamur. Consequitur, inquam.
«It is so,» said I. «Therefore of sufficiency and power there is one and the same nature.» «So it seems.» «But that which is of this kind, do you judge it to be despised, or, on the contrary, most worthy of the veneration of all things?» «But this,» said I, «cannot even be doubted.» «Let us add, then, reverence to sufficiency and power, that we may judge these three to be one.» «Let us add it, if indeed we are unwilling to confess the truth.» «But what?» she said. «Do you judge this to be obscure and ignoble, or most renowned by all fame? But consider, lest what is granted to want for nothing, to be most powerful, to be most worthy of honor, should lack renown which it cannot bestow on itself, and on that account seem in some part more abject.» «I cannot,» said I, «but confess that, being what it is, it is also most renowned.» «It follows, then, that we acknowledge renown to differ in nothing from the three above.» «It follows,» said I.
我說:「正是這樣。」「所以自足與權能有一個相同的本性。」「看來如此。」「但凡屬這一類之物,你判定它是該被藐視的,還是相反,最值得萬物敬重的呢?」我說:「但這事連懷疑都不能。」「那麼,讓我們把敬重加在自足與權能上,使我們判定這三者為一。」「我們就加上罷,倘若我們不願承認真理。」她又說:「那又怎樣?你判定這是隱晦卑微的,還是被一切名聲所推崇、最有名望的呢?但你且思想:免得那被許為無所匱乏、最有權能、最配受尊榮之物,竟缺乏它無法賜給自己的名望,並因此在某一方面顯得較為卑下。」我說:「我不能不承認:它既是這樣的,便也是最有名望的。」「那麼推論起來,我們便承認名望與上述三者毫無分別。」我說:「是這樣推出的。」
3:29
Quod igitur nullius egeat alieni, quod suis cuncta uiribus possit, quod sit clarum atque reuerendum, nonne hoc etiam constat esse laetissimum? Sed unde huic, inquam, tali maeror ullus obrepat ne cogitare quidem possum; quare plenum esse laetitiae, si quidem superiora manebunt, necesse est confiteri. Atqui illud quoque per eadem necessarium est sufficientiae, potentiae, claritudinis, reuerentiae, iucunditatis nomina quidem esse diuersa, nullo modo uero discrepare substantiam. Necesse est, inquam. Hoc igitur quod est unum simplexque natura, prauitas humana dispertit et dum rei quae partibus caret partem conatur adipisci, nec portionem quae nulla est nec ipsam quam minime affectat adsequitur. Quonam, inquam, modo?
«That, then, which needs nothing of another's, which can do all things by its own powers, which is renowned and reverend — does it not also stand to be most gladsome?» «But whence,» said I, «any sorrow could creep upon such a thing, I cannot even imagine; wherefore it must needs be confessed to be full of gladness, if indeed the foregoing things hold.» «And yet this too is necessary by the same reasoning, that the names of sufficiency, power, renown, reverence, and pleasantness are indeed different, but in no way differ in substance.» «It is necessary,» said I. «This, then, which is one and simple by nature, human perversity parcels out, and while it tries to obtain a part of a thing that lacks parts, it attains neither the portion, which is none, nor the thing itself, which it least seeks after.» «In what way,» said I, «is this?»
「那麼,那無需別人之物、能憑自己的能力行一切、有名望且可敬之物——它豈不也應當是最歡欣的麼?」我說:「但何等的憂愁能爬上這樣之物,我連想都想不出來;所以必然要承認它滿有歡欣,倘若上述之事成立。」「再說,按同一推理,這也是必然的:自足、權能、名望、敬重、歡愉這些名稱固然各異,本質上卻毫無分別。」我說:「這是必然的。」「那麼這本性中一而簡單之物,人的乖謬卻把它分散了;他試圖去得著一個無部分之物的一部分,結果既得不著那根本不存在的份,也得不著他最不去追求的那物本身。」我說:「這是怎樣的呢?」
3:30
Qui diuitiae, inquit, petit penuriae fuga, de potentia nihil laborat, uilis obscurusque esse mauult, multas etiam sibi naturales quoque subtrahit uolup- tates, ne pecuniam quam parauit amittat. Sed hoc modo ne sufficientia quidem contingit ei quem ualentia deserit, quem molestia pungit, quem uilitas abicit, quem recondit obscuritas. Qui uero solum posse desiderat, profligat opes, despicit uoluptates honoremque potentia carentem gloriam quoque nihili pendit. Sed hunc quoque quam multa deficiant uides. Fit enim ut aliquando necessariis egeat, ut anxietatibus mordeatur cumque haec depellere nequeat, etiam id quod maxime petebat potens esse desistat. Similiter ratiocinari de honoribus, gloria, uoluptatibus licet.
«He who,» she said, «seeks riches by fleeing penury, takes no trouble about power, prefers to be lowly and obscure, and withdraws from himself even many natural pleasures, lest he lose the money he has procured. But in this way not even sufficiency comes to him whom strength deserts, whom trouble pricks, whom cheapness casts down, whom obscurity hides away. But he who desires power alone squanders his wealth, despises pleasures, and counts as nothing both honor and the glory that lacks power. But you see how many things are wanting even to this man. For it comes about that sometimes he lacks necessities, that he is gnawed by anxieties, and, since he cannot drive these off, he ceases to be powerful even in that which he most sought. One may reason similarly about honors, glory, and pleasures.»
她說:「凡藉逃避貧困而尋求財富的人,毫不為權能操勞,寧願卑賤無名,甚至從自己身上撤去許多本性的享樂,免得失去他所謀得的錢財。但這樣,連自足也不臨到他——就是那被力量所棄、被煩惱所刺、被低賤所貶、被晦暗所藏的人。但凡單單渴望權能的人,便揮霍財富,藐視享樂,並把尊榮和那缺乏權能的榮耀都當作無物。但你看見,連這人也缺少何等多的東西。因為有時他竟缺乏必需之物,被焦慮啃齧,既不能驅走這些,便連他最尋求的那權能也不再有了。論到尊榮、榮耀、享樂,也可同樣推論。」
3:31
Nam cum unumquodque horum idem quod cetera sit, quisquis horum aliquid sine ceteris petit, ne illud quidem quod desiderat apprehendit. Quid igitur? inquam. Si qui cuncta simul cupiat adipisci, summam quidem ille beatitudinis uelit. Sed num in his eam reperiet, quae demonstrauimus id quod polluentur non posse conferre? Minime, inquam. In his igitur quae singula quaedam expetendorum praestare ei eduntur, beatitudo nullo modo uestiganda est. Fateor, inquam, et hoc nihil dici uerius potest. Habes igitur, inquit, et formam falsae felicitatis et causas. Deflecte nunc in aduersum mentis intuitum; ibi enim ueram quam promisimus statim uidebis. Atqui haec, inquam, uel caeco perspicua est eamque tu paulo ante monstrasti, dum falsae causas aperire conaris.
«For since each one of these is the same as the rest, whoever seeks any one of them without the others does not grasp even that which he desires.» «What then?» said I. «If anyone should desire to attain all of them at once, he would indeed wish the sum of blessedness. But will he find it in these, which we have shown cannot bestow what they promise?» «By no means,» said I. «In these things, then, which are reported to furnish each some one of the things to be sought, blessedness is in no way to be tracked down.» «I confess it,» said I, «and nothing truer than this can be said.» «You have, then,» she said, «both the form of false happiness and its causes. Now turn the gaze of your mind to the opposite side; there you will at once see the true happiness which we promised.» «And yet this,» said I, «is clear even to a blind man, and you showed it a little before, while you were trying to lay open the causes of the false.»
「因為這些之中既各自與其餘相同,凡尋求其中任何一樣而沒有其餘的人,連他所渴望的那一樣也得不著。」我說:「那又怎樣呢?」「若有人想要一次得著這一切,他確實是願得福樂的總和。但他能在這些事中尋著福樂麼?就是我們已經顯明、不能賜下所應許之物的這些事。」我說:「絕不能。」「那麼,在這些被傳為各自供給一樣當尋求之物的事中,福樂是斷不能追尋得到的。」我說:「我承認,再沒有比這更真的話可說了。」她說:「那麼,你既有了虛假幸福的樣式,也有了它的緣由。如今把你心思的注視轉向相反的一面;在那裡你必立即看見我們所應許的真幸福。」我說:「然而這事連瞎子都看得明白,你不久前在試圖揭開那虛假之因時,便已顯明了它。」
next part →
← ch. 2ch. 4 →
12345

Tell me when new readings are published

One email per new chapter reading. Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe.