📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Institutes & Conferences

John Cassian

Institutes & Conferences 1 part 14/44

Latin original · 41 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 1:528–1:568 (1768 verses in all)

ch. 2 →
← prev partnext part →
1:528
non enim merentur celerem temporis istius expeditamque medioinam , quorum duritia et inpaenitens cor poenam uitae praesentis excedens thesaurizat sibi ipsi iram et indignationem in die irae et reuelationis iusti iudicii dei, in quo uermis eorum non morietur, et ignis eorum non extinguetur. contra quos propheta uelut anxius pro adflictione sanctorum, uidens eos aerumnis uariis ac temptationibus subiacere et e contra peccatores non solum absque ullo humiliationis flagello cursum mundi istius pertransire, sed etiam afluentia diuitiarum ac summa rerum omnium prosperitate gaudere, intolerabili zelo ac spiritus sui more succensus exclamat: mei autem paene moti sunt pedes:
For they do not merit the swift and expeditious medicine of this present time, whose hardness and impenitent heart, exceeding the punishment of the present life, 'treasures up for itself wrath and indignation in the day of wrath and revelation of the just judgment of God,' in which 'their worm shall not die, and their fire shall not be extinguished.' Against whom the prophet, as it were anxious for the affliction of the saints—seeing them subject to divers hardships and temptations, and on the contrary the sinners not only passing through the course of this world without any scourge of humiliation, but even rejoicing in an abundance of riches and the utmost prosperity of all things—inflamed with intolerable zeal after the manner of his spirit, exclaims: 'But my feet were almost moved:'
因為他們不配得今世這迅速便捷的良藥;他們剛硬、不肯悔改的心,超越了今生的刑罰,「為自己積蓄忿怒,以致神震怒、顯祂公義審判的日子」,在那日「他們的蟲是不死的,火是不滅的」。那先知彷彿為聖徒的苦難而焦慮——看見聖徒遭受各樣艱難與試探,反倒罪人不但毫無謙卑的鞭打而度過今世的路程,甚至還享受財富的豐盈與萬事最高的亨通——便照他心靈的常態,被難以忍受的義憤點燃,呼喊說:「至於我,我的腳幾乎失閃;
1:529
paulo minus effusi sunt gressus mei. quia zelaui super iniquos, pacem peccatorum uidens. quia non est respectus in morte eorum: nec firmamentum in plaga eorum. in laboribus hominum non sunt, et cum hominibus non flagellabuntur, scilicet in futuro cum daemonibus puniendi, qui in praesenti non meruerunt in sorte ac disciplina filiorum cum hominibus flagellari. Hieremias quoque cum deo super hac impiorum prosperitate disceptans, licet nequaquam dubitare se de iustitia domini profiteatur dicens: iustus quidem tu es domine, si disputem tecum, causas tamen huius tantae inaequalitatis inquirens subiungit et dicit: uerumtamen iusta loquar ad te: quare uia inpiorum prosperatur:
'my steps had well nigh slipped. For I was envious at the wicked, seeing the peace of sinners. For there is no regard to their death, nor firmness in their stroke. They are not in the labors of men, neither shall they be scourged with men'—namely, being destined to be punished with the demons in the future, who in the present have not merited to be scourged with men in the lot and discipline of sons. Jeremiah too, disputing with God over this prosperity of the wicked, though he by no means professes himself to doubt of the Lord's justice, saying: 'Thou indeed, O Lord, art just, if I should dispute with thee'—yet inquiring the causes of so great an inequality, subjoins and says: 'But nevertheless I will speak just things to thee: Why doth the way of the wicked prosper?
我的腳險些滑跌。我見惡人享平安,就心懷不平。因為他們死的時候沒有疼痛,他們的力氣卻也壯實。他們不像別人受苦,也不像別人遭災」——就是說,他們將來要與鬼魔一同受罰,因為他們在今世不配像兒女那樣分受管教、與人一同遭災。耶利米也為惡人這樣的亨通與神爭辯;他雖絕不承認自己懷疑主的公義,說:「耶和華啊,我與你爭辯的時候,你顯為義」——卻仍探究這樣大不平的緣由,接著說:「然而我還要與你理論:惡人的道路為何亨通?
1:530
bene est omnibus, qui praeuaricantur, et inique agunt? plantasti eos, et miserunt radicem: proficiunt et faciunt fructum. prope es tu ori eorum et longe a renibus eorum. quorum ruinam deflente domino per prophetam et ad eorum curationem medicos atque doctores sollicite dirigente et quodammodo eos ad planctum similem pronocante ac dicente: subito cecidit Babylon, contrita est: ululate super eam, tollite resinam ad dolorem eius, si forte sanetur, respondent desperantes angeli, quibus salutis humanae cura conmissa est, uel certe propheta ea persona apostolorum seu spiritalium uirorum atque doctorum uidentium duritiam mentis eorum et inpaenitens cor: curauimus Babylonem, et non est sanata:
'Wherefore are all they happy that transgress, and do wickedly? Thou hast planted them, and they have taken root: they prosper and bring forth fruit. Thou art near in their mouth, and far from their reins.' Whose ruin the Lord bewails through the prophet, and carefully directs physicians and teachers to their cure, and in a manner invites them to a like lamentation, saying: 'Babylon is suddenly fallen, she is crushed: howl over her, take balm for her pain, if so be she may be healed'; the angels, to whom the care of human salvation is committed, answer despairing—or certainly the prophet, in the person of the apostles or of spiritual men and teachers, seeing the hardness of their mind and their impenitent heart: 'We have healed Babylon, and she is not healed:'
「行詭詐的為何都得亨通呢?你栽培了他們,他們也扎了根,長大而且結果。他們的口與你相近,心卻與你遠離。」主藉先知為他們的敗亡哀哭,殷勤差遣醫生與教師去醫治他們,並某種程度上邀他們一同哀號,說:「巴比倫忽然傾覆毀壞,你們要為她哀號,為止她的疼痛取乳香來,或者她可以治好」;那些受託看顧人類救恩的天使卻絕望地回答——或者說先知,代表使徒或屬靈之人與教師,看見他們心思的剛硬與不肯悔改的心,回答說:「我們本想醫治巴比倫,她卻沒有治好;
1:531
relinquamus eam, et eamus unusquisque in terram suamrquoniam pernenit usque ad caelos iudicium eius, et eleuatum est usque ad nubes. de istorum igitur desperato languore ex persona dei loquitur Esaias ad Hierusalem: a planta pedis usque ad uerticem non est in ea sanitas: uulnus, et liuor, et plaga tumens, non est circumligata, nec curata medicamine, nec fota oleo. Tot autem esse in inmundis spiritibus quot in hominibus studia non dubie conprobatur.
'let us forsake her, and let us go every one into his own land; for her judgment hath reached even unto the heavens, and is lifted up even to the clouds.' Concerning the desperate languor of these, therefore, Isaiah speaks in the person of God to Jerusalem: 'From the sole of the foot even to the crown of the head there is no soundness in her: a wound, and a bruise, and a swelling sore, it is not bound up, nor cured with medicine, nor soothed with oil.' Moreover, it is beyond doubt proved that there are as many pursuits in the unclean spirits as in men.
「我們不如離開她,各人歸回本地,因為她受的審判已達到天上,高及雲霄。」所以,論到這些人絕望的病弱,以賽亞代表神向耶路撒冷說:「從腳掌到頭頂,沒有一處完全的:盡是傷口、青腫與腫爛的瘡,沒有包紮,沒有用藥醫治,也沒有用油滋潤。」再者,無可置疑地證明,污穢之靈中間有多少種嗜好,正如人中間一樣。
1:532
nam nonnullos eorum, quos etiam Planos uulgus appellat, ita seductores et ioculares esse manifestum est, ut certa quaeque loca seu uias iugiter obsidentes nequaquam tormentis eorum quos praetereuntes potuerint decipere delectentur, sed derisu tantummodo et inlusione contenti fatigare eos potius studeant quam nocere: quosdam solummodo innocuis incubationibus hominum pernoctare, alios ita esse furori ac truculentiae deditos, ut non sint contenti illorum tantummodo corpora quos subpleuerint atroci dilaceratione uexare, sed etiam inruere super eminus transeuntes atque adficere illos saeuissima caede festinent:
For it is manifest that some of them—whom the common folk even call 'Wanderers' (Plani)—are such deceivers and buffoons that, continually beset­ting certain places or roads, they take no delight in the torments of those whom they have been able to deceive in passing, but, content only with mockery and derision, they strive rather to tire them than to harm them; that some do nothing but pass the night in harmless oppressions of men; that others are so given over to fury and truculence that they are not content merely to vex with atrocious laceration the bodies of those whom they have filled, but even hasten to rush upon passers-by at a distance and to afflict them with most savage slaughter:
因為顯然牠們中間有些——民間甚至稱之為「游蕩者」(Plani)——是這樣的騙子與丑角,牠們不斷盤據某些地方或道路,卻不以折磨那些過路被牠們得以欺哄的人為樂,反倒只滿足於戲弄與嘲笑,寧可使他們疲乏,不使他們受害;有些不過在夜間對人施行無害的壓迫;另有些則如此傾向於狂怒與凶殘,以致不僅不滿足於以殘暴的撕裂折磨那些牠們附身之人的身體,甚至急於撲向遠處的過路人,以最凶猛的殺戮加害他們:
1:533
quales illi in euangelio describuntur, ob quorum metum per illam uiam transire iam nullus audebat. quos eorumque consimiles bellis quoque et sanguinis effusione pro insatiabili ferocitate gaudere non dubium est.
such as those who are described in the Gospel, for fear of whom no one dared any longer to pass by that way. That these, and their like, rejoice also in wars and in the shedding of blood by reason of their insatiable ferocity, is not to be doubted.
就如福音中所描述的那些鬼,人因懼怕牠們,再沒有人敢從那條路經過。這些鬼以及與牠們相似的,因其貪得無厭的凶暴,也以戰爭與流血為樂,這是無可置疑的。
1:534
alios ita eorum corda quos ceperant inani quodam tumore uidemus infecisse, quos etiam Bacuceos uulgus appellat, ut semet ipsos ultra proceritatem sui corporis erigentes nunc quidem se in quosdam fastus gestusque sustollerent, nunc uero uelut adclines ad quendam se tranquillitatis et adfabilitatis statum communes blandosque submitterent, seseque uelut inlustres et circumspectabiles omnibus aestimantes nunc quidem adorare se potestates sublimiores corporis inflexione monstrarent, nunc uero ab aliis se crederent adorari et omnes motus, quibus uera officia aut superbe aut humiliter peraguntur, explerent. alios repperimus non solum studere mendaciis, sed etiam blasphemias hominibus inspirare.
Others we see to have infected with a certain empty swelling the hearts of those whom they had seized—whom the common folk even call 'Bacucei'—so that, raising themselves up beyond the tallness of their own body, now indeed they lift themselves into certain airs of arrogance and gestures, now again, as if inclined to a certain state of tranquillity and affability, they lower themselves to be common and bland; and esteeming themselves, as it were, illustrious and worthy of universal regard, now indeed they show by the bending of the body that they adore higher powers, now again they believe themselves to be adored by others, and go through all the motions by which true offices are performed, whether proudly or humbly. Others we have found not only to be zealous for lies, but even to inspire men with blasphemies.
另有些鬼,我們看見牠們用一種虛浮的自大感染了牠們所抓住之人的心——民間甚至稱之為「巴庫刻」(Bacucei)——以致這些人把自己挺立得超過本身的身高,時而擺出某種傲慢的架勢與姿態,時而又彷彿轉向某種平靜與和藹的樣式,將自己放低到平易可親的地步;他們自以為顯赫、值得眾人矚目,時而以身體的鞠躬顯出自己敬拜更高的權勢,時而又自以為受別人敬拜,並演盡一切或高傲或謙卑地表達真正禮儀的舉動。另有些鬼,我們發現牠們不但熱衷於謊言,甚至將褻瀆的話啟發給人。
1:535
cuius rei etiam nos testes sumus, qui audiuimus apertissime daemonem confitentem per Arrium et Eunomium se impietatem sacrilegi dogmatis edidisse. quod etiam in quarto Regnorum libro unum ex isdem ipsis manifeste legimus praedicantem: egrediar, inquit, et ero spiritus mendax in ore omnium prophetarum eius. de quibus apostolus, arguens illos qui ab ipsis decipiuntur, ita infert: adteudentes spiritibus seductoribus et doctrinis daemoniorum, in hypocrisi loquentium mendacium. esse autem et alia daemonum genera, id est mutorum atque surdorum, euangelia testantur.
Of which thing we too are witnesses, who have heard most openly a demon confessing that through Arius and Eunomius it had put forth the impiety of a sacrilegious dogma. Which also, in the fourth book of Kings, we manifestly read one of those very spirits proclaiming: 'I will go forth,' it says, 'and will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets.' Of whom the Apostle, reproving those who are deceived by them, thus infers: 'giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons, speaking lies in hypocrisy.' But that there are also other kinds of demons, that is, of the dumb and deaf, the Gospels testify.
關於這事,我們也作見證,因我們曾極明白地聽見一個鬼供認,牠曾藉亞流與歐諾米烏將褻瀆神的教條之不虔散布出來。這事我們在《列王紀》(希臘文第四卷)中也明明讀到那些靈中的一個宣稱說:「我要出去,」牠說,「在他眾先知口中作說謊的靈。」使徒論到那些被牠們欺哄的人,責備他們說:「聽從那引誘人的邪靈和鬼魔的道理,這是因為說謊之人的假冒。」但福音書也作見證,另有別種鬼,就是啞的與聾的。
1:536
incentores etiam libidinis atque luxuriae quosdam spiritus esse propheta conmemorat spiritus, inquiens, fornicationis decepit eos, et fornicati sunt a deo suo. nocturnos quoque siue diurnos ac meridianos daemonas similiter scripturarum auctoritas docet. de quorum diuersitate perlongum est si uolumus omnia scripturarum uolumina perscrutantes singillatim percurrere, qui per prophetam onocentauri, qui pilosi, quae sirenae, quae lamiae, quae ululae, qui strathiones , qui hericii designentur, qui aspis, qui basiliscus in psalmo, qui leo, qui draco, quiue scorpios in euangelio nuncupetur, qui princeps mundi huius, qui rectores harum tenebrarum quaeue spiritalia nequitiae ab apostolo nominentur.
The prophet also mentions that certain spirits are inciters of lust and luxury, saying: 'The spirit of fornication hath deceived them, and they have committed fornication against their God.' Nocturnal likewise, and diurnal, and noonday demons, the authority of the Scriptures in like manner teaches. Concerning the diversity of these, it would be too long if we wished, searching through all the volumes of the Scriptures, to run through them one by one: who by the prophet are designated onocentaurs, who hairy ones (fauns), who sirens, who lamiae, who screech-owls, who ostriches, who hedgehogs; who the asp, who the basilisk in the psalm; who the lion, who the dragon, or who the scorpion in the Gospel is named; who the prince of this world, who the rulers of these darknesses, or what spiritual forces of wickedness are named by the Apostle.
先知也提到,某些靈是情慾與淫佚的煽動者,說:「淫亂的靈迷惑了他們,使他們行淫離棄他們的神。」聖經的權威同樣教導我們,有夜間的、白晝的,以及正午的鬼。至於這些鬼的種類繁多,我們若要遍查聖經各卷,一一列舉,未免過於冗長:誰在先知書中被稱為驢頭人身怪,誰是多毛的(野人),誰是海妖,誰是拉米亞,誰是鴟鴞,誰是鴕鳥,誰是刺蝟;誰在詩篇中是虺蛇,誰是毒蛇;誰在福音書中被稱為獅子、龍或蠍子;誰被使徒稱為這世界的王,誰是這幽暗的掌權者,或哪些是屬靈氣的惡魔。
1:537
quae uooabula non casn neo fortuito indita illis debemus accipere, sed significatione istarum ferarum, quae. apud nos uel minus noxiae uel magis perniciosae sunt, illorum ferocitatee rabiesque distingui et ex similitudine nequitiae uirolentae seu principatus, quem istis inter ceteras feras siue serpentes quaedam excellentia malitiae suae confert, illos quoque eorum uocabulis nuncupari, ut scilicet alius quidem ob uehementiam furoris et rabiem ferocitatis suae leonis appellationem, alius basilisci ob illud mortiferum uirus quod priusquam sentiatur interimit, alius uero ob teporem malitiae suae onocentauri ant hericii nomen struthionisue sortitus sit. GERMANVS:
These names we ought not to receive as bestowed upon them by chance or fortuitously, but that by the signification of those wild beasts—which among us are either less harmful or more pernicious—their ferocity and rage is distinguished; and that from the likeness of a virulent wickedness or of the preeminence which a certain excellence of malice confers upon these among the other beasts or serpents, they too are named by their appellations: so that one, indeed, on account of the vehemence of fury and the rage of his ferocity, obtains the appellation of a lion; another, of a basilisk, on account of that deadly venom which slays before it is felt; another, on account of the lukewarmness of his malice, is allotted the name of an onocentaur or a hedgehog or an ostrich. GERMANUS:
這些名稱,我們不當視為偶然或碰巧加在牠們身上的,乃當明白:藉著那些野獸的意義——牠們在我們中間或較無害、或較有害——牠們的凶暴與狂怒得以區分;並且照著一種惡毒的凶暴、或某種惡毒的卓越在這些野獸或毒蛇中所賦予的優越性之相似,牠們也照這些的名稱被稱呼:於是,有的因其狂怒的猛烈與凶暴的暴戾而得「獅子」之名;有的因那未及察覺便置人於死的致命毒液而得「毒蛇」之名;有的則因其惡毒的溫吞冷淡而分得「驢頭人身怪」或「刺蝟」或「鴕鳥」之名。日耳曼努:
1:538
Non quidem ambigimus illos quoque ordines quos apostolus enumerat ad istos referri, quia non est nobis conluctatio aduersus carnem et sanguinem, sed aduersus principatus, aduersus potestates, aduersus mundi rectores tenebrarum harum, contra spiritalia nequitiae in caelestibus. uolumus tamen nosse unde haec sit tanta inter eos differentia, uel quemadmodum tanti nequitiae extiterint gradus? an ad hoc creati sint, ut hos ordines malitiae sortirentur et quodammodo huic nequitiae militarent? SEBENVS :
We do not indeed doubt that those orders too which the Apostle enumerates refer to these, since 'our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places.' Yet we wish to know whence there is this so great difference among them, or how there came to be such degrees of wickedness. Or were they created for this, that they should be allotted these orders of malice and in a manner serve as soldiers to this wickedness? SERENUS:
我們固然不懷疑使徒所列舉的那些等級也是指這些鬼而言,因為「我們並不是與屬血氣的爭戰,乃是與那些執政的、掌權的、管轄這幽暗世界的,以及天空屬靈氣的惡魔爭戰」。然而我們願意知道,牠們中間為何有這樣大的差別,或者這樣的惡毒等級是怎樣產生的?難道牠們受造原是為此,要被分派這些惡毒的等級,並以某種方式為這惡毒充當兵士嗎?塞倫努:
1:539
Quamquam propositiones uestrae totum tempus nocturnae quietis ita nostris furentur obtutibus, ut adpropinquantis aurorae nequaquam uiciniam sentiamus et usque ad ortum solis insatiabiliter conlationis huius uerba contexere prouocemur, tamen quoniam absolutio propositae quaestionis, cum coeperit indagari, in quoddam amplissimum ac profundissimum nos educit pelagus quaestionum, quod praesentis horae breuitas non sinit transmeari, commodius reor ut eam futurae noctis indagini reseruemus, quo et mihi sub huius quaestionis occasione de uestro propensiore conloquio laetitia spiritalis ac fructus uberior conferatur, et propositarum quaestionum sinus praebente nobis spiritu sancto prosperos flatus liberius penetrare possimus.
Although your propositions so steal from our eyes the whole time of the night's rest that we do not at all perceive the nearness of the approaching dawn, and are provoked to weave together insatiably the words of this conference right up to the rising of the sun, nevertheless, since the resolution of the proposed question, once it has begun to be investigated, leads us out into a certain most vast and most profound sea of questions which the brevity of the present hour does not allow to be traversed, I think it more convenient that we reserve it for the inquiry of the coming night, so that both to me, on the occasion of this question, a spiritual gladness and a richer fruit may be conferred from your more willing conversation, and that, the Holy Spirit affording us favorable breezes, we may more freely penetrate the bays of the proposed questions.
雖然你們所提出的問題如此攫奪了我們眼目整夜安息的全部時光,以致我們絲毫未察覺黎明將近的臨近,反而被激動得直到日出仍不知饜足地編織這場談道的言語;然而,既然所提問題的解答一旦開始探究,便將我們引入某片極為浩瀚而深邃的問題之海,是眼下短促的時辰所不容橫渡的,我以為更合宜的是將它保留給來夜的探究,好使我藉此問題之機,從你們更加樂意的交談中獲得屬靈的喜樂與更豐盛的果實,也使我們藉聖靈賜下順利的和風,能更自在地深入所提問題的港灣。
1:540
quamobrem soporis modi- cum degustantes discutiamus obrepentem oculis nostris uicina iam luce torporem, ac deinceps pariter ad ecclesiam procedentes, quoniam nos hoc facere dominici diei sollemnitas commonet, reuersi post synaxin ea, quae dominus ad instructionem communem pro desiderio uestro largitus fuerit, duplicato gaudio conferemus. 10 CAPITVLA. De humanitate abbatis Sereni. Propositio de diuersitate nequitiarum caelestium. Responsio de multiplici esca scripturarum sanctarum De gemina sententia super intellectu scripturarum sanctarum. De eo quod proposita quaestio inter illa quae media tenenda sunt debeat accipi. De eo quod nihil a deo malum creatum sit.
Wherefore, tasting a little sleep, let us shake off the drowsiness that now steals over our eyes with the light so near, and then, proceeding together to the church—since the solemnity of the Lord's day admonishes us to do this—when we have returned after the synaxis we shall confer with doubled joy on those things which the Lord shall have bestowed, according to your desire, for our common instruction. TEN CHAPTERS. On the kindness of Abba Serenus. A proposition concerning the diversity of the heavenly wickednesses. A reply concerning the manifold food of the holy Scriptures. On the twofold sense in the understanding of the holy Scriptures. On the fact that the proposed question ought to be received among those things that are to be held in a middle way. On the fact that nothing evil was created by God.
因此,讓我們稍嚐睡眠,抖落此刻天光將近而侵襲我們眼目的昏沉,隨後一同前往教會——因為主日的隆重提醒我們如此行——待聚會之後歸來,我們便懷著加倍的喜樂,共同談論主按你們的心願、為我們共同的教導所要賜下的事。十章。論塞熱努斯院父的仁慈。關於天上諸般邪惡之多樣的提問。關於聖經多樣食糧的答覆。論理解聖經的雙重意義。論所提之問題當歸入須以折衷態度持守之事列。論神未曾創造任何邪惡之物。
1:541
De initio principatuum seu potestatum. De lapsu diaboli et angelorum. Obiectio, quod ruina diaboli a deceptione Euae pri cipium sumpserit Responsio de initio lapsus diaboli. De eius qui decipit sine qui decipitur poena. De constipatione daemonum et inquietudine quam in hoc aere semper exercent. De eo quod inpugnationem, quam erga homines inpendunt, etiam aduersum se conmoueant contrariae potestates. Vnde factum sit ut potestatum seu principatuum nomina spiritales nequitiae sortirentur. De eo quod non sine causa sanctis caelestibusque uirtutibus angelorum siue archangelorum nomina sint indita. De subiectione daemonum, quam suis principibus praebent, fratris uisione perspecta.
On the beginning of the principalities or powers. On the fall of the devil and of the angels. An objection, that the ruin of the devil took its beginning from the deception of Eve. A reply concerning the beginning of the devil's fall. On the punishment of him who deceives and of him who is deceived. On the throng of the demons and the restlessness which they always exercise in this air. On the fact that the hostile powers stir up against one another also the assault which they wage against men. Whence it came about that the spiritual wickednesses obtained the names of powers or principalities. On the fact that not without cause the names of angels or archangels have been bestowed on the holy and heavenly virtues. On the subjection of the demons which they render to their princes, perceived through a brother's vision.
論執政的或掌權的之起源。論魔鬼與眾天使的墮落。一項反駁:魔鬼的敗亡是由誘惑夏娃開始的。關於魔鬼墮落之起始的答覆。論誘惑者與受誘者所受之刑罰。論群魔的稠密,以及牠們在此空氣中不斷施行的騷擾。論那些敵對的權勢也彼此挑起牠們對人所發動的攻擊。論屬靈的諸邪惡何以獲得「掌權的」或「執政的」之名。論聖潔而屬天的諸能力何以並非無故被賜以天使或天使長之名。論群魔向牠們的首領所表現的順服,藉一位弟兄的異象而得見。
1:542
De eo quod singulis hominibus duo angeli semper adhaereant. De differentia nequitiae, quae aduersis spiritibus inest, per duos philosophos adprobata. De eo quod daemones nihil aduersus homines praeualeant, nisi eorum prius mentes obsederint Interrogatio de apostatis angelis, qui in Genesi cum filiabus hominum concubuisse dicuntur. Absolutio propositae quaestionis. Obiectio, quemadmodum generi Seth cum filiabus Cain profana conmixtio ante interdictum legis potuerit inputari. Responsio, quod naturali lege ab initio homines iudicio seu poenae fuerunt obnoxii. De eo quod iuste puniti sunt qui ante diluuium peccauerunt De diabolo quod dicitur in euangelio quomodo intellegendum sit:
On the fact that two angels always cling to each individual man. On the difference of the wickedness which is in the adverse spirits, proved through two philosophers. On the fact that the demons prevail nothing against men unless they have first besieged their minds. An inquiry concerning the apostate angels, who in Genesis are said to have lain with the daughters of men. A resolution of the proposed question. An objection: how could the profane intermingling of the race of Seth with the daughters of Cain be imputed before the prohibition of the law? A reply, that by natural law from the beginning men were liable to judgment or to punishment. On the fact that those who sinned before the flood were justly punished. Concerning the devil, how what is said in the gospel is to be understood:
論兩位天使常依附於每一個人。論敵對之靈裡所有之邪惡的差別,藉兩位哲人得以證明。論群魔對人毫無所能,除非先圍困了人的心思。關於背道之天使的探問,他們在《創世記》中被說成曾與人的女子同寢。所提問題的解答。一項反駁:塞特的後裔與該隱的女兒褻瀆的混合,在律法禁令頒布之前如何能被歸咎於人?答覆:按自然律,人從起初便須受審判或刑罰。論洪水之前犯罪的人受了公義的刑罰。關於魔鬼,福音書中所說的話當如何理解:
1:543
quia mendax est et pater eius. Consummatis quae diei sollemnitas exigebat et ecclesiae congregatione dimissa reuersi ad cellam senis refecti primum lautissime sumus. nam pro muria, quae superiecta olei gutta cotidianae refectioni solebat adponi, modicum liquaminis miscuit et olei quiddam solito propensius superfudit.
'for he is a liar and the father of it.' When the things which the solemnity of the day required had been completed and the assembly of the church dismissed, we returned to the old man's cell and were first refreshed most sumptuously. For in place of the brine, over which a drop of oil poured on top was wont to be added to the daily meal, he mixed in a little fish-sauce and poured over a little more oil than usual.
「因他是說謊的,也是說謊之人的父。」當那日隆重禮儀所要求之事完成、教會的聚會散去之後,我們回到那老者的居室,先受了極為豐盛的款待。因為,代替那平日在日常飲食上澆上一滴油的滷汁,他調入了少許魚醬,並比往常稍多地澆上了油。
1:544
nam illam olei guttam ob hoc unusquisque cotidie refecturus instillat, non ut eius ex hoc gustu quandam percipiat suauitatem (quippe cuius tantus est modus, ut uix ipsius gutturis ac faucium meatus non dicam linire, sed pertransire sufficiat), sed ut hoc usu iactantiam cordis, quae pro abstinentia districtiore blande solet ac latenter inrepere, et stimulos elationis obtundat, quia quanto abstinentia ipsa occultius exercetur nulloque hominum teste perficitur, tanto subtilius occultatorem suum temptare non desinit. deinde adposuit salem frictum, oliuas ternas:
For each one instills that drop of oil daily when about to eat, not that from this taste he may perceive any sweetness—since indeed its measure is so small that it scarcely suffices, I will not say to anoint, but even to pass through the passages of the throat and gullet—but that by this practice he may blunt the vainglory of the heart, which is wont to creep in gently and secretly on account of the stricter abstinence, and the goads of pride; because the more secretly abstinence itself is exercised and is accomplished with no man as witness, the more subtly it does not cease to tempt its concealer. Then he set out roasted salt, three olives apiece:
每個人在將要進食時每日滴上那一滴油,並非要從這一嚐中得著甚麼甘美——因為其分量實在極少,我不說塗抹咽喉與食道的通道,就連通過也幾乎不足——乃是要藉此習慣挫去心中的虛榮,這虛榮常因較嚴格的禁食而溫和隱密地潛入,並挫去驕傲的刺;因為禁食本身行得越隱密、越是無人作見證地完成,就越發精巧地不停試探那隱藏它的人。接著他擺上炒過的鹽,各三顆橄欖:
1:545
quibus post haec superintulit canistrum habens cicer frictum quod illi trogalia uocant, ex quibus quina tantum sumpsimus grana, myxaria bina, caricas singulas. hunc enim numerum in illa heremo quemquam excessisse culpabile est. qua refectione transacta repromissam quaestionis absolutionem cum reposcere coepissemus, proferte, inquit senex, interrogationem uestram, cuius in hanc horam distuleramus indaginem. Tum GEBMANVS: Vnde, quaesumus, tanta uarietas aduer- . sariarum potestatum contra hominem ac diuersitas ista processit, quam beatus apostolus ita dinumerat:
upon which, after these, he brought in a basket containing roasted chickpeas, which they call 'trogalia,' of which we took only five grains each, two plums, and a single dried fig apiece. For to exceed this number in that desert is culpable. When this refreshment was over and we had begun to demand back the promised resolution of the question, 'Put forth,' said the old man, 'your inquiry, whose investigation we had deferred to this hour.' Then GERMANUS: 'Whence, we ask, did such great variety of the adverse powers against man and this diversity proceed, which the blessed apostle thus enumerates:
在這些之後,他又端上一個籃子,裡面盛著炒過的鷹嘴豆,他們稱之為「脆點」,我們每人只取了五粒,兩顆李子、每人一顆無花果乾。因為在那曠野中超過這個數目是該受責備的。這頓款待結束後,我們開始索回先前所應許的問題解答,那老者說:「提出你們的問題吧,就是我們把探究推遲到此時的那問題。」於是革爾瑪努斯說:「我們請問,那對人敵對的諸權勢如此繁多的種類,以及這樣的差異,是從何而出的呢?蒙福的使徒如此列舉牠們:
1:546
non est nobis conluctatio aduersus carnem et sanguinem, sed aduersus principatus, aduersus potestates, aduersus mundi rectores tenebrarum harum, contra spiritalia nequitiae in caelestibus, et iterum: neque angeli neque principatus, neque uirtutes neque creatura alia poterit nos separare a caritate dei quae est in Christo Iesu domino nostro? unde ergo tantae malitiae aemula nobis emersit aduersitas? an ad hoc potestates istas a domino conditas esse credendum est, ut his contra hominem gradibus atque ordinibus militarent ? SERENVS:
our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places; and again: neither angels nor principalities, nor powers, nor any other creature shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord? Whence then has such an emulous adversity of malice emerged against us? Or is it to be believed that these powers were founded by the Lord for this, that they should war against man by these grades and orders?' SERENUS:
我們並不是與屬血氣的爭戰,乃是與那些執政的、掌權的、管轄這幽暗世界的,以及天空屬靈氣的惡魔爭戰;又說:無論是天使、是掌權的、是有能的,或是別的受造之物,都不能叫我們與神的愛隔絕,這愛是在我們的主基督耶穌裡的?那麼,這樣與我們為敵、爭競作惡的仇對是從何而生的呢?抑或當相信這些權勢是主為此而造的,好叫牠們按這些等級與位分與人爭戰?」塞熱努斯說:
1:547
Diuinarum scripturarum auctoritas de his in quibus nos uoluit erudire quaedam etiam his qui acumine ingenii carent tam lucide et euidenter effata est, ut non solum nulla occultioris sensus obscuritate uelentur, sed ne ullo quidem patrocinio interpretationis indigeant et in superficie uocis ac litterae suos intellectus ac sententias praeferant: quaedam uero ita contecta et quibusdam sunt obscurata mysteriis, ut in eorum discussione et intellectu inmensum nobis exercitii \'campum ac sollicitudinis reseruaret. quam rem multas ob causas deum dispensasse manifestum est:
The authority of the divine Scriptures, in those matters concerning which it willed to instruct us, has uttered certain things so lucidly and evidently even to those who lack sharpness of intellect, that they are not only veiled by no obscurity of a more hidden sense, but do not even need any support of interpretation, and on the very surface of the word and letter present their meanings and sentences; but certain things are so covered over and obscured by certain mysteries that in the discussion and understanding of them it has reserved for us an immeasurable field of exercise and solicitude. That God has ordained this for many causes is manifest:
聖經的權威,在祂所願教導我們的那些事上,甚至對缺乏悟性敏銳之人,也將某些事說得如此明晰而昭然,以致它們不但不被任何較隱晦之意的暗昧所遮蔽,甚至無需任何解釋的扶持,就在字句的表面顯明其意義與旨趣;然而某些事卻被某些奧祕如此遮蓋隱藏,以致在探討與理解它們之時,為我們留下了一片無可測度的操練與勤勞之田。神為許多緣故如此安排,是顯而易見的:
1:548
primum ne saoramenta diuina nullum habentia spiritalis intellectus uelamen obductum cunctis hominibus, id est tam fidelibus quam profanis aequali sdentia et notitia panderentur et per hoc inter inertes ac studiosos nulla esset uirtutis prudentiaeque distantia, tum ut etiam inter ipsos domesticos fidei, dum intellectuum spatia coram eis inmensa tenduntur, esset in quibus et desidiosorum argueretur inania et studiosorum alacritas atque industria probaretur.
first, lest the divine mysteries, having no veil of spiritual understanding drawn over them, should be laid open to all men—that is, to the faithful as well as to the profane—with equal knowledge and acquaintance, and through this there should be no distinction of virtue and prudence between the slothful and the studious; then, that even among the very household of the faith, while the immense spaces of understandings are stretched out before them, there might be that in which both the emptiness of the slothful might be reproved and the alacrity and industry of the studious might be proved.
其一,免得神聖的奧祕在其上未被拉上屬靈悟性的帳幔,便以同等的知識與認識向眾人——即信者與不虔者一概——敞開,因此在懈怠者與勤勉者之間便無德行與智慧的分別;其二,好使即便在信徒之家之內,當浩瀚的悟性之地在他們面前展開時,也有那足以既責備懈怠者的空虛、又證明勤勉者的敏捷與勤奮之事。
1:549
ideoque satis proprie scriptura dinina agro opimo ac fertili conparatur, qui cum multa gignat ac proferat quae ad hominum uictum sine aliqua ignis coctione proficiant, quaedam nisi prius flammae calore mitigata atque mollita omnem asperitatem suae deposuerint cruditatis, uel incongrua usibus humanis uel noxia sentientur. nonnulla uero ita utrique usui apta nascuntur, ut nec incocta sua cruditate displiceant uel offendant et tamen ignis calore decocta salubriora reddantur.
And therefore quite fittingly is the divine Scripture compared to a rich and fertile field which, though it begets and brings forth many things that avail for the sustenance of men without any cooking by fire, yet certain things, unless first tempered and softened by the heat of flame so as to lay aside all the harshness of their rawness, are perceived as either unsuited to human uses or harmful. But some things are born so apt for both uses that they neither displease nor offend in their raw, uncooked state, and yet, when cooked by the heat of fire, are rendered more wholesome.
因此,聖經頗為恰當地被比作一片肥沃豐產的田地,它雖生出並產出許多無需火烹就可供人食用之物,然而某些之物,若不先經火焰之熱調和軟化、卸下其生澀的一切粗糙,便會顯得或不適於人用、或有害。但也有些物生來如此適於兩種用途,以致它們在生澀未烹的狀態既不令人生厭亦不冒犯,而經火熱烹煮後,卻更顯有益健康。
1:550
plura quoque ad escam tantummodo inrationabilium inmentorum et animalium uel ferarum ac uolucrum proferuntur, cibis hominum minime profutura, quae etiam in sua asperitate manentia absque ulla ignis confectione uitalem iumentis conferunt sanitatem. quam rationem satis euidenter aspicimus in hoc uberrimo spiritalium scripturarum paradiso contineri, in quo ita quaedam significatione litterae plana ac luculenta resplendent, ut, cum sublimiore interpretatione non egeant, simplici tantum litterae sono abunde pascant ac nutriant audientes, ut est illud: audi, Israhel, dominus deus tuus dominus unus est, et: diliges dominum deum tuum ex toto corde tuo, et ex tota anima tua, et ex tota uirtute tua.
Many things too are brought forth only for the food of irrational cattle and animals, or of wild beasts and birds, in no way profitable for the foods of men, which, even remaining in their harshness without any preparation by fire, confer vital health upon the beasts of burden. This same principle we see quite evidently to be contained in this most abundant paradise of the spiritual Scriptures, in which certain things shine forth so plain and clear in the signification of the letter that, since they need no more sublime interpretation, by the simple sound of the letter alone they abundantly feed and nourish the hearers, as is that: Hear, O Israel, the Lord thy God is one Lord; and: thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength.
還有許多之物僅為無理性的牲畜與走獸,或野獸與飛鳥的食物而生出,對人的食糧毫無益處,這些即便存留其粗糙、未經火烹,仍賜牲畜以維生的健康。同樣的道理,我們清楚看見蘊含在這屬靈聖經極為豐盛的樂園之中,其中某些事在字面意義上顯得如此平白清晰,以致無需更崇高的解釋,僅憑字句的簡單音聲便豐足地餵養滋潤聽者,如那句:以色列啊,你要聽,耶和華我們的神是獨一的主;又如:你要盡心、盡性、盡力愛耶和華你的神。
1:551
quaedam autem si allegorica explanatione extenuata non fuerint et spiritalis ignis examinatione mollita, nullo modo ad salutarem interioris hominis cibum sine corruptionis labe peruenient magisque ex eorum perceptione laesio quam utilitas aliqua subsequetur, ut est illud: sint lumbi uestri praecincti et lucernae ardentes, et: qui non habet gladium, uendat tunicam suam et emat sibi gladium, et: qui non accipit crucem suam et sequitur me, non est me dignus.
But certain things, unless they have been attenuated by allegorical explanation and softened by the examination of the spiritual fire, will in no way arrive at the salutary food of the inner man without the stain of corruption, and rather from their reception harm than any usefulness will follow, as is that: let your loins be girded and your lamps burning; and: he who has no sword, let him sell his tunic and buy himself a sword; and: he who does not take up his cross and follow me is not worthy of me.
然而某些之物,除非藉寓意的解釋加以稀釋、藉屬靈之火的煉驗加以軟化,便絕不能無腐敗之玷污地達至內心之人有益的食糧,且從其領受所隨之而來的,寧是損害而非甚麼益處,如那句:你們腰裡要束上帶,燈也要點著;又如:沒有刀的要賣衣服買刀;又如:不背著自己的十字架跟從我的,就不配作我的門徒。
1:552
quod quidam districtissimi monachorum, habentes quidem zelum dei, sed non secundum scientiam, simpliciter intellegentes fecerunt sibi cruces ligneas easque iugiter umeris circumferentes non aedificationem, sed risum cunctis uidentibus intulerunt. nonnulla uero ad utramque perceptionem, id est tam historicam quam allegoricam ita conmode ac necessarie capiuntur, ut utraque explanatio uitales sucos animae subministret, ut est illud : si quis te percusserit in dextera maxilla tua, praebe illi et alteram, et: cum persequuntur uos in ciuitate ista, fugite in aliam, et: si uis perfectus esse, uade uende omnia quae habes et da pauperibus, et habebis thesaurum in caelo, et ueni sequere me.
For certain of the most rigorous of the monks, having indeed a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge, understanding this simply, made for themselves wooden crosses and, carrying them about continually on their shoulders, brought upon themselves not edification but laughter from all who saw them. But some things are taken so conveniently and necessarily for both apprehensions—that is, both the historical and the allegorical—that either explanation supplies the vital juices to the soul, as is that: if anyone strikes you on your right cheek, offer him the other also; and: when they persecute you in this city, flee into another; and: if you wish to be perfect, go, sell all that you have and give to the poor, and you shall have treasure in heaven, and come, follow me.
因為有些最嚴謹的修士,雖確有為神的熱心,卻不是按著真知識,只按字面理解,便為自己造了木製的十字架,不斷扛在肩上四處背負,結果不是造就人,反倒惹來一切看見之人的譏笑。然而有些事卻如此恰當而必要地兼取兩重領會——即歷史的與寓意的——以致兩種解釋都供給靈魂維生的汁液,如那句:有人打你的右臉,連左臉也轉過來由他打;又如:有人在這城裡逼迫你們,就逃到別的城去;又如:你若願意作完全人,可去變賣你所有的分給窮人,就必有財寶在天上,你還要來跟從我。
1:553
producit sane et faenum lumentis , quibus pabulis omnes scripturarum repleti sunt campi, simplicem scilicet puramque narrationem historicae lectionis, qua simpliciores quique ac minus capaces perfectae et integrae rationis, de quibus dicitur: homines et iumenta saluabis domine, secundum status ac mensurae suae condicionem ad opus tantum et laborem actualis uitae uegetiores robustioresque reddantur. Quamobrem de his, quae aperta explanatione prolata sunt, nos quoque constanter possumus definire audenterque nostram proferre sententiam.
It produces indeed also hay for the cattle, with which fodder all the fields of the Scriptures are filled—namely, the simple and pure narrative of the historical reading—by which the simpler ones and those less capable of perfect and complete reasoning, concerning whom it is said: Men and cattle thou shalt save, O Lord, may, according to the condition of their state and measure, be rendered more vigorous and robust only for the work and labor of the active life. Wherefore, concerning those things which are set forth with open explanation, we too can constantly define and boldly put forth our opinion.
它確實也為牲畜產出乾草,就是使聖經所有田地充滿的那飼料——即歷史經文平白純樸的敘述——藉此,那些較單純、較無力達至完全周全推理之人,就是那論到他們所說「耶和華啊,人民、牲畜,你都救護」的人,可按其身分與度量的境況,僅為積極生活的工作與勞苦而變得更加充沛強健。因此,關於那些以明白解釋所陳明之事,我們也能穩妥地界定、放膽提出我們的意見。
1:554
ea uero, quae meditationi et exercitio nostro reseruans obtecta sanctis scripturis spiritus diuinus inseruit, quibusdam ea uolens indiciis et opinionibus colligi, ita pedetemptim debent cauteque conferri, ut sit eorum adsertio uel confirmatio in disputantis uel suscipientis arbitrio eonlocata . nonnumquam enim cum super una re dinersa promatur sententia, potest utraque rationabilis iudicari et sine detrimento fidei uel fixe uel medie suscipi, id est ut ei nec plena credulitas nec absoluta refutatio deputetur priorique sequens opinio derogare non debeat, cum neutra earum fidei inueniatur obsistere.
But those things which the divine Spirit, reserving them for our meditation and exercise, has inserted covered over in the holy Scriptures, willing certain of them to be gathered by indications and opinions, ought so gradually and cautiously to be conferred, that their assertion or confirmation be placed in the judgment of the one disputing or the one receiving. For sometimes, when a diverse opinion is put forth on one matter, either may be judged reasonable and, without detriment to the faith, be received either firmly or in a middle way—that is, so that neither full belief nor absolute refutation be assigned to it—and the later opinion ought not to derogate from the prior, since neither of them is found to oppose the faith.
然而神聖的靈為我們的默想與操練所保留、遮蓋著插入聖經之中的那些事,既願其中某些藉徵象與意見來推知,就當如此漸進而謹慎地加以商討,使其斷言或確認置於辯論者或領受者的判斷之中。因為有時,當就同一件事提出不同意見,兩者都可判為合理,並且無損於信仰地或堅決地或折衷地加以領受——即對它既不歸以完全的信從,也不歸以絕對的駁斥——而後起的意見不當貶損在先的意見,因為兩者中無一被發現與信仰相牴觸。
1:555
quale est illud, quod Helias uenerit in lohaune et iterum sit aduentum domini praecursurus, et de abominatione desolationis, quod steterit in loco sancto per illud simulacrum Iouis quod Hierosolymis in templo positum legimus et iterum stare habeat in ecclesia per aduentum Antichristi, illaque omnia quae in euangelio sequuntur, quae et inpleta ante captiuitatem Hierosolymorum et in fine mundi huius intelleguntur inplenda. e quibus neutra opinio inpugnat aliam nec sequentem prior intellectus euacuat.
Such is that: that Elias has come in John and again is to precede the coming of the Lord; and concerning the abomination of desolation, that it stood in the holy place through that image of Jupiter which we read was placed in the temple at Jerusalem, and again is to stand in the church through the coming of Antichrist; and all those things which follow in the gospel, which are understood both to have been fulfilled before the captivity of Jerusalem and to be about to be fulfilled at the end of this world. Of which neither opinion attacks the other, nor does the prior understanding annul the following.
譬如那事:以利亞已在約翰身上而來,且又要在主降臨之先為前驅;又如關於那行毀壞可憎的,它藉那座我們讀到曾被立於耶路撒冷聖殿中的丟斯像,站在聖地,且又要藉敵基督的降臨站在教會之中;還有福音書中隨後所記的一切事,被理解為既已在耶路撒冷被擄之前應驗,又將在此世的末了應驗。就這些而言,兩種意見無一攻擊另一種,在先的領會也未廢除隨後的。
1:556
Et idcirco proposita a uobis quaestio licet non satis uideatur nec frequenter inter homines uentilata nec apud plurimos pateat, et ez hoc ipso apud aliquos ea quae proferemus forsitan uideantur ambigua, ita debemus nostram temperare sententiam, quoniam fidei trinitatis nihil praeiudicat, ut inter illa habeatur quae medie sunt tequoda , quamquam non tali opinione qualis suspicionibus tantum et coniecturis colligi solet, sed manifestis scripturarum testimoniis omnia conprobentur. Absit ergo ut deum quicquam creasse confiteamur quod substantialiter malum sit, dicente scriptura: omnia quae fecit deus, bona ualde.
And therefore, the question proposed by you, although it does not seem to have been sufficiently nor frequently ventilated among men, nor to lie open to very many—and from this very thing what we shall put forth may perhaps seem doubtful to some—we ought so to temper our opinion, since it in no way prejudices the faith of the Trinity, that it be held among those things which are to be held in a middle way; yet not with such an opinion as is wont to be gathered only by suspicions and conjectures, but let everything be proved by manifest testimonies of the Scriptures. Far be it therefore that we should confess God to have created anything that is substantially evil, since the Scripture says: all things which God made are very good.
因此,你們所提的問題,雖似乎在世人中未被充分或屢屢論及,也不向極多人敞開——正因如此,我們所要陳明的,在某些人看來或許顯得可疑——我們既然它絲毫無損於三位一體的信仰,就當如此節制我們的意見,使它歸入那須以折衷態度持守之事列;然而並非以那種慣於僅憑猜疑與臆測而得的意見,乃要一切都以聖經明顯的見證加以證實。因此,斷不可讓我們承認神曾創造任何本質為惡之物,因為聖經說:神所造的一切都甚好。
1:557
si enim a deo tales isti creati sunt uel ad hoc facti, ut hos malitiae gradus teneant ac semper deceptionibus et ruinis hominum uacent, contra praedictae scripturae sententiam infamabimus deum uelut creatorem atque inuentorem malorum, quod scilicet pessimas uoluntates ac naturas ipse condiderit, ad hoc eas creans, ut semper in nequitia perseuerantes numquam transire possint in bonae uoluntatis adfectum. hanc igitur rationem diuersitatis huius traditione patrum de sanctarum scripturarum fonte percepimus.
For if these were created by God, or made for this, that they should hold these grades of malice and always be at leisure for the deceptions and ruins of men, then contrary to the sentence of the aforesaid Scripture we shall defame God as the creator and inventor of evils—namely, that he himself founded the most wicked wills and natures, creating them for this, that, always persevering in wickedness, they might never be able to pass over into the affection of a good will. This reasoning, therefore, of this diversity we have received by the tradition of the fathers from the fount of the holy Scriptures.
因為,倘若這些是被神所造,或是為此而被造,好叫牠們保有這些惡的等級、常常從事誘惑與敗壞人的事,那麼我們便要違背前述聖經的判詞,誣蔑神為諸惡的創造者與發明者——即說祂親自造出了那些最邪惡的意志與本性,為此而造牠們,使牠們常存於邪惡、永不能轉入善良意志的傾向。因此,關於這差異的道理,我們是藉眾教父的傳統、從聖經的源頭領受的。
1:558
Ante conditionem huius uisibilis creaturae spiritales caelestesque uirtutes deum fecisse, quae pro hoc ipso quod scirent se ad tantam beatitudinis gloriam beneficio creatoris ez nihilo fuisse productas perpetuas ei gratias referentes indesinenter eius laudibus inhaererent, nemo fidelium dubitat. nec enim existimare debemus creationis et opificii sui principia ab huius mundi constitutione deum primitus inchoasse, quasi in illis anterioribus atque innumeris saeculis ab omni prouidentia et dispensatione diuina fuerit otiosus, ac tamquam non habens in quos bonitatis suae exerceret beneficia solitarius atque ab omni munificentia alienus fuisse credatur.
That before the creation of this visible creation God made the spiritual and heavenly virtues—which, for this very reason, that they knew themselves to have been produced from nothing by the benefit of the Creator unto so great a glory of blessedness, rendering him perpetual thanks, clung unceasingly to his praises—no one of the faithful doubts. Nor indeed ought we to think that God first began the beginnings of his creation and workmanship from the constitution of this world, as though in those former and innumerable ages he was idle from all providence and divine dispensation, and as though, not having those upon whom he might exercise the benefits of his goodness, he is to be believed to have been solitary and estranged from all munificence.
沒有一個信徒懷疑:在這可見的受造之物被造之前,神已造了屬靈而屬天的諸能力——這些能力正因知道自己是蒙造物主的恩惠、從無中被造以致得如此偉大的福樂榮耀,便向祂獻上永恆的感謝,不住地依附於對祂的頌讚。我們實在也不當以為神是從這世界的建立才首次開始祂創造與工作的起頭,彷彿在那先前無數的世代中,祂閒置於一切護理與神聖的安排之外,又彷彿當相信祂因無可施行其良善恩惠的對象,便曾是孤獨、與一切慷慨施予相隔絕的。
1:559
quod de illa inmensa ac sine principio et inconprehensibili maiestate satis humile est incongruumque sentire, ipso domino de illis potestatibus haec dicente: quando facta sunt simul sidera, laudauerunt me uoce magna omnes angeli mei. qui ergo intersunt creationi siderum, ante istud principium in quo factum dicitur caelum et terra creati fuisse manifestissime conprobantur, quippe qui pro istis omnibus uisibilibus creaturis quas uidebant ex nihilo processisse creatorem magna uoce referuntur et admiratione laudasse.
To think this concerning that immense, beginningless, and incomprehensible majesty is quite lowly and unfitting, the Lord himself saying these things concerning those powers: when the stars were made together, all my angels praised me with a loud voice. Those, therefore, who are present at the creation of the stars are most manifestly proved to have been created before that beginning in which heaven and earth are said to have been made, since indeed they are reported to have praised the Creator with a loud voice and with admiration for all these visible creatures which they saw proceed from nothing.
對那無限的、無始的、不可測度的威嚴如此設想,實在是頗為卑陋而不合宜的,因為主親自論到那些能力如此說:眾星一同被造之時,我的眾天使都大聲讚美我。因此,那些在眾星被造時在場者,最為顯然地被證實是在那被說成造了天地的起頭之前就已被造,因為他們確被記載為,因見一切可見的受造之物從無中而出,便大聲並帶著驚歎讚美造物主。
1:560
ante istud ergo temporale principium, quod a Moyse dicitur quodque mundi huius secundum historicum, immo Iudaicum sensum signat aetatem (saluo scilicet nostro sensu, quo nos interpretamur omnium rerum Christum esse principium, in quo omnia creauerit pater secundum illud: omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil), ante istud, inquam, Geneseos temporale principium omnes illas potestates caelestesque uirtutes deum creasse non dubium est. quas apostolus per ordinem dinumerans ita describit: quia in Christo creata sunt omnia in caelis et in terra, uisibilia et inuisibilia, siue angeli sine archangeli, sine throni siue dominationes, siue principatus sine potestates.
Before, therefore, that temporal beginning which is spoken of by Moses, and which signifies the age of this world according to the historical—or rather Judaic—sense (our own sense being, of course, preserved, by which we interpret Christ to be the beginning of all things, in whom the Father created all things, according to that: all things were made through him, and without him was nothing made), before, I say, that temporal beginning of Genesis, that God created all those powers and heavenly virtues is not doubtful. Which the apostle, enumerating them in order, thus describes: for in Christ were created all things in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether angels or archangels, whether thrones or dominions, whether principalities or powers.
因此,在摩西所說的那時間性的起頭之前——這起頭按歷史的、或更該說猶太的意義,標誌著此世的年代(當然仍保留我們自己的意義,即我們將基督解為萬有的起始,父在祂裡面創造了萬有,正如那句:萬物是藉著祂造的,凡被造的沒有一樣不是藉著祂造的)——我說,在《創世記》那時間性的起頭之前,神已創造了那一切能力與屬天的諸德能,這是毫無疑問的。使徒按次序列舉牠們,如此描述:因為萬有都是在基督裡造的,無論天上的、地上的,能看見的、不能看見的,或是天使、或是天使長,或是有位的、或是主治的,或是執政的、或是掌權的。
1:561
omnia per ipsum et in ipso creata sunt. De istorum itaque numero nonnullos principes fuisse conlapsos lamentatio Ezechielis siue Esaiae manifestissime docent, in quibus principem Tyri uel illum Luciferum, qui mane oriebatur, flebili planctu cognoscimus lamentari. et de illo quidem ita dominus ad Ezechiel: fili hominis, leua planctum super principem Tyri: et dices ei: haec dicit dominus deus: tu signaculum similitudinis, plenus sapientia, perfectus decore, in deliciis paradisi dei fuisti: omnis lapis pretiosus operimentum tuum: sardius, topazius et iaspis, chrysolithus et onyx et beryllus, sapphirus et carbunculus et smaragdus: aurum opus decoris tui:
all things were created through him and in him. That therefore of the number of these some princes had fallen, the lamentation of Ezekiel or of Isaiah most manifestly teaches, in which we recognize the prince of Tyre, or that Lucifer who rose in the morning, to be lamented with mournful wailing. And concerning the former the Lord speaks thus to Ezekiel: son of man, take up a lamentation over the prince of Tyre, and say to him: thus says the Lord God: thou wast the seal of resemblance, full of wisdom, perfect in beauty; thou wast in the delights of the paradise of God; every precious stone was thy covering: sardius, topaz, and jasper, chrysolite and onyx and beryl, sapphire and carbuncle and emerald; gold was the work of thy beauty:
萬有都是藉著祂、又是為著祂而造的。因此,這些之中曾有些君王墮落了,以西結或以賽亞的哀歌極為顯然地教訓我們,在其中我們認出推羅王、或那清晨升起的路西弗,被以悲慟的哀號哀悼。關於前者,主如此對以西結說:人子啊,你要為推羅王作哀歌,對他說,主耶和華如此說:你曾是那相似的印記,智慧充足,全然美麗;你曾在神的樂園伊甸中;各樣寶石是你的遮蓋,就是紅寶石、紅璧璽、金鋼石、水蒼玉、紅瑪瑙、碧玉、藍寶石、綠寶石、紅玉;黃金是你精美的工藝:
1:562
et foramina tua in die, qua conditus es, praeparata sunt. tu chernb extentus et protegens, et posui te in monte sancto dei, in medio lapidum igneorum ambulasti. perfectus in uiis tuis adie conditionis tuae, donec inuenta. est iniquitas in te. in multitudine negotiationis tuae repleta sunt interiora tua iniquitate, et peccasti: et eieci te de monte dei, et perdidi te o chernb protegens, in medio lapidum igneorum. eleuatum est cor tuum in decore tuo: perdidisti sapientiam tuam a decore tuo, in terram proieci te: ante faciem regum dedi te ut cernerent te. in multitudine iniquitatum tuarum, et iniquitate negotiationis tuae polluisti sanctificationem tuam. Esaias quoque de alio:
and thy settings, prepared in the day in which thou wast created. Thou wast a cherub stretched out and protecting, and I set thee on the holy mountain of God; thou didst walk in the midst of the stones of fire. Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day of thy creation, until iniquity was found in thee. In the multitude of thy trafficking thy inward parts were filled with iniquity, and thou didst sin; and I cast thee out from the mountain of God, and destroyed thee, O protecting cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. Thy heart was lifted up in thy beauty; thou hast lost thy wisdom by reason of thy beauty; I have cast thee to the ground; before the face of kings I gave thee, that they might behold thee. In the multitude of thy iniquities, and by the iniquity of thy trafficking, thou hast defiled thy sanctuary. Isaiah also, concerning another:
你受造之日,你的鑲座早已預備。你是那受膏遮掩約櫃的基路伯;我將你安置在神的聖山上,你在發光如火的寶石中間往來。你從受造之日所行的都完全,後來在你中間又察出不義。因你貿易很多,就被強暴的事充滿,以致犯罪;我因此將你當作污穢之物從神的山驅逐你;遮掩約櫃的基路伯啊,我已將你從發光如火的寶石中除滅。你因美麗心中高傲;你因美麗敗壞了你的智慧;我已將你摔倒在地;在諸王面前將你擺置,好叫他們目睹你。你因罪孽眾多,貿易不義,就褻瀆了你的聖所。以賽亞也論到另一位:
1:563
quomodo cecidisti de caelo Lucifer, qui mane oriebaris? conruieti in terram, qui uulnerabas gentes? qui dicebas in corde tuo: in caelum conscendam, super astra dei ponam solium meum, sedebo in monte testamenti, in lateribus aquilonis. ascendam super altitudinem nubium, ero similis altissimo. quos tamen non solos ex illo beatissimae stationis apice conruisse scriptura conmemorat, dicens tertiam partem stellarum draconem illum secum pariter pertraxisse. unus quoque apostolorum euidentius dicit: angelos uero qui non seruauerunt suum principatum, sed reliquerunt domicilium suum, in iudicium magni diei uinculis aeternis sub caligine reseruauit. illud etiam quod ad nos dicitur:
how art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning? thou art cast down to the earth, thou who didst wound the nations? who didst say in thy heart: I will ascend into heaven, above the stars of God I will set my throne, I will sit on the mount of the testament, in the sides of the north; I will ascend above the height of the clouds, I will be like the Most High. Whom, however, the Scripture records not to have fallen alone from that summit of the most blessed station, saying that the dragon drew down with him likewise the third part of the stars. One also of the apostles says more evidently: but the angels who kept not their principality, but left their own dwelling, he has reserved in eternal chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. That also which is said to us:
明亮之星、清晨之子啊,你何竟從天墜落?你這攻敗列國的,何竟被砍倒在地?你心裡曾說:我要升到天上,我要高舉我的寶座在神眾星以上,我要坐在聚會的山上,在北方的極處;我要升到高雲之上,我要與至上者同等。然而聖經記載,他並非獨自從那至福位分的巔峰墜落,乃說那龍將天上眾星的三分之一一同拖下。使徒之中也有一位更明白地說:至於那些不守本位、離開自己住處的天使,主用鎖鏈把他們永遠拘留在黑暗裡,等候大日的審判。還有那向我們所說的話:
1:564
uos autem sicut homines moriemini: et sicut unus de principibus cadetis, quid aliud quam multos principes cecidisse significat? quibus indiciis ratio diuersitatis huius ista colligitur, has differentias ordinum, quas instar sanctarum caelestiumque uirtutum aduersae potestates habere dicuntur, uel ex illius anterioris ordinis gradu in quo unaquaeque creata fuerat nunc etiam retentare, uel certe de caelestibus deuolutas ad similitudinem illarum uirtutum, quae ibidem perseuerant, pro nequitiae suae merito, in qua unaquaeque in malum creuit, hos inter se gradus et ordinum uocabula in parte contraria uindicasse. GERMANVS:
but you shall die like men, and shall fall like one of the princes—what else does it signify than that many princes had fallen? By which indications this reasoning of the diversity is gathered: that these differences of orders, which the adverse powers are said to have after the likeness of the holy and heavenly virtues, they either still retain even now from the grade of that former order in which each had been created, or certainly, having been rolled down from the heavenly ones, after the likeness of those virtues which persevere in that same place, they have, according to the merit of their wickedness in which each grew into evil, claimed for themselves these grades and appellations of orders in the contrary party. GERMANUS:
然而你們要死如世人,仆倒如列王中的一位——這若不是表明許多君王曾墮落,還能表明甚麼呢?藉這些徵象,這差異的道理便得以推知:那些敵對的權勢被說成按聖潔而屬天諸德能之樣式而有的等級差別,牠們或是至今仍從各自受造時所在之先前位分的等級中保有這些,或者確是從天上者滾落,按那些持守在同一處之德能的樣式,各按其成長為惡的邪惡功過,在敵對的一方為自己僭取了這些等級與位分之名。革爾瑪努斯說:
1:565
Nos hactenus credebamus causam atque illitium ruinae seu praeuaricationis diabolicae, qua de angelica statione deiectus est, inuidiam specialiter extitisse, quando Adam et Euam liuida calliditate decepit. SERENVS: Non esse istud praeuaricationis illius seu deiectionis initium Geneseos lectio manifestat, quae ante illorum deceptionem eerpentini nominis nota eum credidit inurendum ita dicens: serpens autem erat sapientior siue, ut Hebraici exprimunt libri, callidior cunctis bestiis terrae quas fecit dominus deus.
We have hitherto believed the cause and beginning of the diabolical ruin or transgression, by which he was cast down from the angelic station, to have been especially envy, when he deceived Adam and Eve with livid cunning. SERENUS: That this was not the beginning of that transgression or casting down, the reading of Genesis makes manifest, which before their deception judged him to be branded with the mark of the serpentine name, saying thus: but the serpent was wiser—or, as the Hebrew books express it, more cunning—than all the beasts of the earth which the Lord God had made.
我們至今相信,魔鬼敗亡或悖逆——就是使他從天使的位分被摔下的那事——其緣由與起始尤其是嫉妒,即當他以陰毒的狡猾誘惑了亞當和夏娃之時。塞熱努斯說:這並非那悖逆或墜落的起頭,《創世記》的經文使之顯明;它在他們受誘之前,便斷定他當被烙上蛇之名的印記,如此說:惟有蛇比耶和華神所造的一切走獸更聰明——或如希伯來文書卷所表達的,更狡猾。
1:566
intellegitis ergo, quod ante illam circumuentionem primi hominis de angelica discesserat sanctitate, ita ut non solum nominis huius insigniri mereretur infamia, sed etiam in nequitiae tergiuersatione ceteris praeferretur bestiis terrae. non enim tali uocabulo scriptura bonum angelum designasset nec de his qui in illa beatitudine perseuerant diceret: serpens autem erat sapientior omnibus bestiis terrae. nam hoc cognomen non solum Gabriheli siue Michaeli nullo modo posset aptari, sed ne bono quidem cuiquam homini conueniret. apertissime itaque et serpentis uocabulum et conparatio bestiarum non sonat angeli dignitatem, sed praeuaricatoris infamiam.
You understand, therefore, that before that circumvention of the first man he had departed from angelic sanctity, so that he not only deserved to be marked with the infamy of this name, but was even preferred to the other beasts of the earth in the tergiversation of wickedness. For the Scripture would not have designated a good angel by such a term, nor concerning those who persevere in that blessedness would it say: but the serpent was wiser than all the beasts of the earth. For this cognomen could in no way be fitted to Gabriel or Michael, nor would it even befit any good man. Most openly, therefore, both the term 'serpent' and the comparison with beasts do not ring of the dignity of an angel, but of the infamy of a transgressor.
因此你們明白,早在那對頭一個人的圈套之先,他已離棄了天使的聖潔,以致他不僅配得被烙上此名的惡名,甚至在邪惡的詭詐反覆上被列於地上其餘走獸之上。因為聖經斷不會用這樣的稱謂指稱一位善天使,論到那些持守在那福樂之中者,也不會說:惟有蛇比地上一切走獸更聰明。因為這別號斷不能安在加百列或米迦勒身上,甚至也不配任何善良之人。因此最為顯然的是,「蛇」這稱謂與同走獸的比較,所響出的並非天使的尊榮,乃是一個悖逆者的惡名。
1:567
denique liuoris ac seductionis materia, qua ut hominem deciperet instigatus est, de anterioris ruinae extitit causa, quod scilicet de limo terrae nuperrime figuratum ad illam eum gloriam cerneret euocandum, unde, cum esset unus de principibus, se meminerat conruisse. et idcirco priorem eius lapsum quo superbiendo conruerat, quo etiam serpens meruerat nuncupari, secunda ruina per inuidiam subsecuta est.
Finally, the matter of envy and seduction by which he was instigated to deceive man arose from his prior ruin as its cause—namely, that he beheld man, most recently fashioned from the mud of the earth, being summoned to that glory from which he remembered that he himself, though he had been one of the princes, had fallen. And therefore his prior fall, by which, growing proud, he had fallen—by which also the serpent had deserved to be named—was followed by the second ruin through envy.
最後,那激動他去誘惑人的嫉妒與誘惑之事,乃是由他先前的敗亡而起、以之為緣由——即他見那新近從地上塵土所塑成的人,正被召往那榮耀,而他記得自己雖曾是眾君王之一,卻已從那榮耀墜落。因此,他先前的墜落——就是他因驕傲高抬而墜落的那次,也就是蛇因此配得其名的那次——之後便隨之而來因嫉妒的第二次敗亡。
1:568
quae inueniens eum adhuc aliquid in sese erectum habentem, ita ut etiam cuiusdam conloquii atque consilii cum homine posset habere consortium, sententia domini utiliter in ima deiectus est, ut non iam sicut ante sublime aliquid intuens et excelsus incederet, sed ut solo cohaerens reperet et humiliatus super uentrem terrenis uitiorum escis et operibus pasceretur, occultum deinceps publicans inimicum ac ponens inter ipsum et hominem utiles inimicitias salutaremque discordiam, ut dum cauetur tamquam hostis noxius, amicitiis fraudulentis ulterius homini nocere non posset.
which, finding him still having something erect in himself, so that he could even hold a certain fellowship of conversation and counsel with man, by the sentence of the Lord he was profitably cast down into the depths, so that no longer, as before, gazing at something lofty, would he walk erect and exalted, but that, clinging to the ground, he would creep, and, humbled, would be fed upon his belly on the earthly foods and works of the vices—thenceforth making public the hidden enemy, and placing between himself and man a useful enmity and a salutary discord, so that while he is guarded against as a harmful foe, he could no longer harm man by fraudulent friendships.
這第二次敗亡,見他自身仍有某種昂然直立之物,以致他甚至能與人保有某種交談與商議的相通,便藉主的判詞有益地將他摔入深處,使他不再像先前那樣仰望崇高之物、昂然高舉地行走,乃要貼著地面爬行,並在屈辱中用肚腹吞食罪惡的屬地食物與作為——從此把那隱藏的仇敵公之於眾,並在他自己與人之間安置一種有益的仇恨與有益於救恩的不和,好使人在提防他為有害之敵時,他便不能再藉詭詐的友誼傷害人。
← prev partnext part →
ch. 2 →
123