📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original
♥ Support

← All books · Latin Fathers › Anti-Arian Works

Anti-Arian Works 13 part 2/11

Latin original · 36 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 13:38–13:73 (388 verses in all)

← ch. 12ch. 14 →
← prev partnext part →
ℹ️ This corpus has no morphological tagging. Glosses are matched by word form against a dictionary — a match does not prove it is the same word (an inflected form can coincide with another word’s lemma). Verify against the original and a specialist lexicon where precision matters.
ℹ️ The Chinese and English alongside are this site's own translation, made directly from the original text on this page (not the CUV or the WEB, which follow the Masoretic Text and a different textual tradition).
13:38
Christus pro nobis interpellat ut homo et ut sacerdos. Quid illud quod in Spiritum sanctum desiderant an­ geli prospicere. Non igitur gemit Spiritus sanctus , quia in natura ejus divina et incommutabiliter beata, nulla gemendi potest esse miseria. Sed tu opponis nobis quia Chri­ stus pro nobis orat : quod nos nullatenus negamus, scientes Apostolum dixisse : Quis accusabit electos Dei ? Deus, qui justificat. Quis eat qui condemnet ? Christus Jesus, qui mortuus est, imo qui et resurrexit, qui est ad dexteram Dei, qui etiam interpellat pro no­ bis (Rom. VIII, 53, 54). Iuterpellat igitur Christus pro nobis, secundum illam naturam quam accepit ex nubis :
Christ intercedes for us as man and as priest. As to that which the angels desire to look into concerning the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit, therefore, does not groan, because in his nature — divine and immutably blessed — there can be no misery of groaning. But you object to us that Christ prays for us: which we in no way deny, knowing that the Apostle said: «Who shall accuse the elect of God? God, who justifies. Who is he that shall condemn? Christ Jesus, who died, or rather who also rose again, who is at the right hand of God, who also intercedes for us» (Rom. 8:33-34). Christ therefore intercedes for us according to that nature which he took from us:
基督以人、以祭司的身分為我們代求。至於天使所願詳察關乎聖靈之事。所以聖靈不歎息,因為在他的本性——神性的、不變地有福的——裡,不可能有歎息的愁苦。但你反駁我們說基督為我們禱告:這我們絕不否認,因為知道使徒說過:「誰能控告神所揀選的人呢?有神稱他們為義了。誰能定他們的罪呢?有基督耶穌已經死了,而且復活了,現今在神的右邊,也替我們祈求」(羅八33-34)。所以基督為我們代求,是按著他從我們所取的那本性:
13:39
quam naturam quia non accepit Spiritus san- ctus , nullatenus pro nobis interpellat aut postulat. Sed quod secundum formam servi solus Filius inter­ pellat, hoc secundum divinitatis unam communem­ que naturam , cum Patre et Filio Spiritus sanctus donat. Nam et ipse Christus Jesus pro hominibus nullatenus oraret, si homo non fieret. Sed orat pro nobis ex officio sacerdotis. Non autem potest vera sacerdotis inveniri persona , ubi non est humanitas vera. Apostolica quippe testatur auctorilas, quia om­ nis pontifex ex hominibus assumptus, pro hominibus constituitur, in his quæ sunt ad Deum, ut offerat dona et sacrificia pro peccatis (Hebr. v, i).
which nature, because the Holy Spirit did not take, he in no way intercedes or petitions for us. But that which the Son alone intercedes according to the form of a servant, this, according to the one common nature of divinity, the Holy Spirit bestows together with the Father and the Son. For even Christ Jesus himself would in no way pray for men, if he had not become man. But he prays for us in virtue of the office of priest. And the true person of a priest cannot be found where there is no true humanity. For the apostolic authority testifies that «every high priest taken from among men is appointed for men in the things that pertain to God, that he may offer gifts and sacrifices for sins» (Heb. 5:1).
這本性因聖靈未曾取用,他就絕不為我們代求或祈求。但那唯獨子按奴僕形像所代求的,聖靈卻按神性同一共有的本性,與父和子一同賜下。因為即使基督耶穌自己,若不成為人,也絕不會為人禱告。但他憑祭司的職分為我們禱告。而在沒有真實人性之處,就找不到真實的祭司位格。因為使徒的權威見證說:「凡從人間挑選的大祭司,是奉派替人辦理屬神的事,為要獻上禮物和贖罪祭」(來五1)。
13:40
Ille autem Pon­ tifex ex hominibus assumptus, ut vere pro nobis of­ ferret sacrificium mundum, nihil aliud obtulit quam seipsum. Illa igitur oblatio, puta sancti et impolluti Pontificis , ipsa pro nobis est exaudibilis oratio Sal­ valoris. Ideo secundum beati Joannis apostoli atte­ stationem : Advocatum habemus apud Patrem Jesum Christum jualum, et ipse est exoratio pro peccatis no­ stris (I Joan. II, I). Qui tamen surgens a mortuis, quia non moritur, et mors ei ultra non dominabitur, carens infirmitate ac mortalitate , simul et moerore caruit et dolore. Proinde et orandi verum pro nobis gerit officium, et tamen non gemit. Securus enim pro nobis interpellat :
But that High Priest, taken from among men, in order that he might truly offer a pure sacrifice for us, offered nothing else than himself. That oblation, therefore, of a holy and undefiled High Priest, is itself the Saviour's prayer for us which can be heard. Therefore, according to the attestation of the blessed apostle John: «We have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous; and he is himself the propitiation for our sins» (1 John 2:1-2). Yet rising from the dead, because he dies no more, and death shall no longer have dominion over him, being without infirmity and mortality, he was at once free from sorrow and from grief. Accordingly he both performs the true office of praying for us, and yet does not groan. For he intercedes for us secure:
但那從人間挑選的大祭司,為要真正為我們獻上潔淨的祭,所獻的無非是他自己。因此,那位聖潔無玷之大祭司的祭物,本身就是救主為我們所獻、蒙垂聽的禱告。所以,照有福的使徒約翰的見證:「我們在父那裡有一位中保,就是那義者耶穌基督;他為我們的罪作了挽回祭」(約壹二1-2)。然而他從死裡復活,既不再死,死也不再作他的主,既脫離軟弱與必死,就同時脫離了憂愁與痛苦。所以他既真實地執行為我們禱告之職,卻不歎息。因為他為我們代求乃是坦然無懼的:
13:41
quia pro illis utique poscit, quibus salutem donare disponit. Nullatenus itaque Christus gemit, dum interpellat pro nobis : quia quod habet ex humanitate carnis ut petat, habet ex majestate divinilatis ut tribuat. Si vero meritum sancti Spiri­ tus ex divina Scriptura cupis agnoscere, vide quid de illo Petrus apostolus dicat; ipse enim ait : Spiritu sancto misso de coelo , in quem concupiscunt angeli prospicere (I Petr. I, 12). Hic certe cum audis Spi­ ritum sanctum de coelo missum, non est quem acci­ pias nisi Spiritum Paraclelum. Memento autem quid Dei Filius de angelis dicat, quia semper vident faciem Patris (Matth. XVIII, 10); qui tamen in 587 Spiri­ tum sanctum prospicere concupiscunt.
because he surely asks for those to whom he has purposed to give salvation. In no way, therefore, does Christ groan while he intercedes for us: because what he has from the humanity of the flesh so as to ask, he has from the majesty of divinity so as to grant. But if you desire to recognize the merit of the Holy Spirit from divine Scripture, see what Peter the apostle says of him; for he himself says: «The Holy Spirit sent from heaven, into whom the angels desire to look» (1 Pet. 1:12). Here surely, when you hear that the Holy Spirit was sent from heaven, there is none whom you may understand save the Paraclete Spirit. But remember what the Son of God says of the angels, that «they always behold the face of the Father» (Matt. 18:10); and yet they desire to look into the Holy Spirit.
因為他所祈求的,正是那些他定意要賜救恩的人。所以基督為我們代求時絕不歎息:因為他從肉身的人性所有的、使他能祈求,也就是他從神性的威嚴所有的、使他能賜予。但你若想從神聖的經文認識聖靈的尊貴,就看使徒彼得論到他所說的話;因為他親自說:「從天上差來的聖靈,就是天使所願詳察的」(彼前一12)。在此,當你聽見聖靈是從天上差來的,你所能領會的無非就是那位保惠師聖靈。但要記得神的子論到天使所說的,說他們「常見我父的面」(太十八10);然而他們卻願詳察聖靈。
13:42
Quod si audi­ res quia sancti angeli faciem sancti Spiritus vident, et in Patrem concupiscunt prospicere, nonne hinc assereres multo potiorem Patrem, quia Spiritus san­ ctus videtur, Pater autem magis concupiscitur qoam videtur ? Non autem Scriptura divina propterea dixit Patrem videri, et Spiritum sanctum concupisci ut po­ tiorem ostenderet Spiritum sanctum (quod nefas est dici) : sed hoc dicendo æqualitatem nobis insinuat Patris et Spiritus sancti. Ut ex hoc quod angeli di­ cuntur Patrem videre, in Spiritum vero sanctum con­ cupiscunt prospicere;
But if you were to hear that the holy angels see the face of the Holy Spirit, and desire to look into the Father, would you not from this assert the Father to be far more excellent, because the Holy Spirit is seen, but the Father is desired rather than seen? But divine Scripture did not on that account say that the Father is seen and the Holy Spirit is desired, in order to show the Holy Spirit more excellent (which is impious to say): but by saying this it instils in us the equality of the Father and of the Holy Spirit. So that from this — that the angels are said to see the Father, but to desire to look into the Holy Spirit —
但你若聽見眾聖天使看見聖靈的面,而願詳察父,你豈不會從此主張父遠為卓越嗎,因為聖靈是被看見的,父卻是被渴慕過於被看見的?然而神聖的經文並非為此才說父是被看見的、聖靈是被渴慕的,好顯明聖靈更為卓越(這是不虔而不可說的):乃是藉這樣說,向我們灌輸父與聖靈的同等。以致從這點——天使被說成看見父,卻願詳察聖靈——
13:43
ad hoc nobis iste serto pro­ ficiat, ut Spiritum sanctum quem vera fides potiorem Patre non potest credere, nullatenus audeat inferio­ rem profana infidelitas jestimare. Una est enim in sanctis angelis indeliciens visio et concupiscentia Trinitatis, quam utique semper et prospiciunt et prospicere concupiscunt. idcirco autem ibi de sum­ mo bono, id est uno vero et beato Deo semper vi- vitur, quia semper videtur semperque amatur. Sicut ergo visionem illam facit amor non deficere, sic amo­ rem facit visio permanere. Ideo autem amor ille non deponitur, quia illa visio non mutatur : propterea vero illa visio non mutatur, quia incommutabile bo­ num est quod videtur.
let this discourse profit us to this end, that the Holy Spirit — whom true faith cannot believe more excellent than the Father — profane unbelief may in no way dare to esteem inferior. For in the holy angels there is one unfailing vision and longing for the Trinity, which they surely both behold always and always desire to behold. But for this reason the summum bonum, that is, the one true and blessed God, is there lived in forever, because he is forever seen and forever loved. As therefore love makes that vision not fail, so vision makes love abide. And love is not laid aside for this reason, because that vision is not changed: and for this reason that vision is not changed, because that which is seen is an immutable good.
願這番話為此使我們得益:就是使那褻瀆的不信,絕不敢把聖靈——真信德無法相信他比父更卓越的那一位——看為較低。因為在眾聖天使裡,對三位一體有一種永不衰竭的看見與渴慕,這是他們必然既常常看見、又常常渴慕看見的。而至善,即那獨一真實有福的神,在那裡被永遠地享有,正是因為他被永遠地看見、被永遠地愛。所以,正如愛使那看見不衰竭,看見也使那愛長存。愛之所以不被擱下,是因為那看見不改變:那看見之所以不改變,是因為所看見的乃是不變的善。
13:44
Illa igitur concupiscentia per.. spiciendi, non est sine lætitia perfruendi. Nihil est enim sancta Trinitate dulcius, nihil suavius, quia nihil est melius. Inde habent angeli æternitatem, ut indeficienter vivant; inde veritatem, ut manifeste vi­ deant ; inde caritatem, ut fideliter concupiscant. BJI LIBBO III. DE UNO IMMENSO ET DOMINO DEO NOSTRO. FRAGMENTUM VII. Quæ sint propria singularum Trinitatis personarum. Possumus enim aliquid de singulis veraciter dicere, quod de tota non possimus dicere Trinitate. Vera­ citer quippe profitemur solum Patrem genuisse, so­ lum Filium de Patre natum esse, veraciter etiam di­ cimus solum Spiritum sanctum de Patre Filioque procedere.
That longing to look upon, therefore, is not without the gladness of enjoying to the full. For nothing is sweeter than the holy Trinity, nothing more pleasant, because nothing is better. Thence the angels have eternity, that they may live unfailingly; thence truth, that they may see manifestly; thence charity, that they may long faithfully. FROM BOOK III. ON THE ONE IMMENSE LORD OUR GOD. FRAGMENT VII. What things are proper to each of the persons of the Trinity. For we can truly say something of each single one, which we cannot say of the whole Trinity. For we truly profess that the Father alone begot, that the Son alone was born of the Father; we also truly say that the Holy Spirit alone proceeds from the Father and the Son.
所以那詳察的渴慕,並非沒有充分享受的喜樂。因為沒有什麼比神聖的三位一體更甘甜,沒有什麼更愉悅,因為沒有什麼更美好。天使的永恆由此而來,使他們永不衰竭地活著;他們的真理由此而來,使他們明白地看見;他們的愛由此而來,使他們忠實地渴慕。摘自第三卷《論獨一無限、我們的主神》。第七片段。三位一體各位格所固有的是什麼。因為我們能真實地論到各個別位格說出一些事,卻不能論到整個三位一體如此說。因為我們真實地宣認:唯獨父生了子,唯獨子從父而生;我們也真實地說:唯獨聖靈從父和子而出。
13:45
Non enim Trinitas Filium genuit, nec Trinitas de Patre nata est, neque Trinitas de Patre Filioque procedit. Sunt igitur singula, quae cum non competant Trinitati, singulis tamen competant in Trinitate personis. Sicut etiam vox itla quae super Jesum baptizatum de cœlo sonuit (Matth. III, 16, 17), sic soli competit Patri, ut nec Filio possit compe­ tere, nec Spiritui sancto; et vidisse Spiritum Dei descendentem sicut columbam, et venientem super se, sic soli competit Filio, ut nec Patri competat ullatenus nec Spiritui sancto; descendisse quoque corporali 588 specie sicut columbam in Jesum, sic soli competit Spiritui sancto, ut nec Patri possit as­ signari nec Filio.
For the Trinity did not beget the Son, nor was the Trinity born of the Father, nor does the Trinity proceed from the Father and the Son. There are therefore single things which, although they do not belong to the Trinity, yet belong to the single persons within the Trinity. Just as that voice too, which sounded from heaven over the baptized Jesus (Matt. 3:16-17), so belongs to the Father alone that it can belong neither to the Son nor to the Holy Spirit; and to have seen the Spirit of God descending like a dove and coming upon him, so belongs to the Son alone that it in no way belongs either to the Father or to the Holy Spirit; and to have descended in bodily form like a dove upon Jesus, so belongs to the Holy Spirit alone that it can be assigned neither to the Father nor to the Son.
因為三位一體並沒有生子,三位一體也不是從父而生,三位一體也不從父和子而出。所以有些個別之事,雖不歸於三位一體整體,卻歸於三位一體之中的個別位格。正如那從天上向受洗的耶穌所發的聲音(太三16-17),也唯獨屬於父,以致既不能屬於子,也不能屬於聖靈;而看見神的靈彷彿鴿子降下、臨到他身上,也唯獨屬於子,以致絕不歸於父,也不歸於聖靈;又如彷彿鴿子以有形之狀降在耶穌身上,也唯獨屬於聖靈,以致既不能歸於父,也不能歸於子。
13:46
Sunt ergo aliqua quæ cougruant singulis, nec conveniant tribus; nihil tamen est quod uni personae non competat, et possit tribus simul convenire personis. Nam in ipsa Trinilate, licet aliud sit de Patre natum esse Filium , aliud de Patre pro­ cedere Spiritum sanctum (quoniam non est eadem I processio Spiritus sancti.qux nativitas Filii), com­ mune tamen est Filio et Spiritui sancto , de Patre naturaliter esse; quamvis solius sit Spiritus sancti, sicut de Patre, sic etiam de Filio esse. At vero Patri proprium est de nullo esse, id est auctorem natura!is essentiæ non habere. FRAGMENTUM VIII. Spiritus sanctus ita replet orbem terrarum, ut sit semper etiam in cœlo.
There are therefore some things which agree with the single persons, and do not befit the three; yet there is nothing which does not belong to one person and can also befit the three persons together. For in the Trinity itself, although it is one thing for the Son to be born of the Father, and another for the Holy Spirit to proceed from the Father (since the procession of the Holy Spirit is not the same as the nativity of the Son), yet it is common to the Son and the Holy Spirit to be from the Father by nature; although it is proper to the Holy Spirit alone to be, as from the Father, so also from the Son. But to the Father it is proper to be from none, that is, not to have an author of his natural essence. FRAGMENT VIII. The Holy Spirit so fills the globe of the earth that he is always also in heaven.
所以有些事合乎個別位格,卻不合乎三位;然而沒有什麼是不屬於某一位格、卻又能同時合乎三個位格的。因為在三位一體本身之中,子從父而生是一回事,聖靈從父而出是另一回事(因為聖靈的發出與子的受生並不相同),然而子與聖靈按本性從父而有,這是共有的;不過唯獨聖靈才有的是:如同從父而有,照樣也從子而有。至於父所固有的是:不從任何一位而有,就是說,他沒有其本性本質的根源。第八片段。聖靈如此充滿全地,以致他也始終在天上。
13:47
Una est immensitas Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti An nescis Christum esse Dei virtutem et Dei sapien­ tiam (I Cor. I, 24).? De qua series divini testatur elo­ quii, quia a Domino Deo est, et cum illo fuit semper, et est ante œvum (Eccli. i, 1). Quia vero invisibilia ejus per ea quæ facta sunt intellecta conspiciuntur, propterea cum ScripLura dixisset : Arenam maris, et pluviæ guttaS, et dies sæculi quis dinumeravit? altitu­ dinem cæli, et latitudinem terræ, et profundum abyssi quis mensus est (Eccli. i, 2) ? ut ex rebus creatis co­ gnosceremus magnificentiam Creatoris, continuo dicitur : Sapientiam Dei præcedentem omnia quis investigavit? Et recte; de ipsa enim dicitur :
One is the immensity of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Do you not know that Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God (1 Cor. 1:24)? Of this the sequence of the divine oracle bears witness, that she is from the Lord God, and was ever with him, and is before all ages (Sir. 1:1). But because his invisible things are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, therefore, when Scripture had said, 'The sand of the sea, and the drops of rain, and the days of the world, who hath numbered? The height of heaven, and the breadth of the earth, and the depth of the abyss, who hath measured?' (Sir. 1:2) — so that from created things we might come to know the magnificence of the Creator — it is immediately added: 'The wisdom of God going before all things, who hath searched it out?' And rightly; for of that same Wisdom it is said:
父、子、聖靈的浩瀚無限乃是同一。難道你不知道基督是神的能力、神的智慧嗎(林前一24)?神聖言語的次序為此作證,說她是出於主神,永遠與他同在,並且在萬世之先(德訓篇一1)。但因為他那看不見的事,藉著所造之物就能被看見、被理解,所以經上既說:「海中的沙、雨滴、世代的日子,誰能數算?天的高、地的闊、深淵的深,誰能量度?」(德訓篇一2)——好叫我們藉著受造之物認識造物主的宏偉——隨即又說:「那先於萬有的神的智慧,誰能尋究?」這是理所當然的;因為關於這智慧本身,經上說:
13:48
Attingit autem ubique propter suam munditiam, et nihil inqui­ namenti in illam incurrit (Sap. VII, 24,26); et iterum : Attingit a fine usque ad finem fortiter, et disponit omnia suaviter (Sap. VIII, 1). Quid est autem ubique attingere, nisi totum implerc ? Implet autem sic omnia, sicut implet et Pater et Spiritus sanctus. Propter quod dicit beatus David : Quo ibo a Spiritu tuo, et a facie tua quo fugiam? Si ascendero in cælIum, ibi tu es; si descendero in infernum, ades ( Psal. CXXXVIII, 7, 8). Alio quoque loco dicitur quoniam Spiritus Domini replevit orbem terrarum (Sap. I, 7). An putas Spiritum sanctum ita orbem terrarum im­ plere , ut in cœlo non sit cum terram implet ?
'For she reacheth everywhere by reason of her purity, and no defiled thing cometh into her' (Wis. 7:24, 26); and again: 'She reacheth from end to end mightily, and ordereth all things sweetly' (Wis. 8:1). But what is it to reach everywhere, if not to fill the whole? And she fills all things even as the Father fills them, and the Holy Spirit. Wherefore blessed David says: 'Whither shall I go from thy Spirit? and whither shall I flee from thy face? If I ascend into heaven, thou art there; if I descend into hell, thou art present' (Ps. 138:7-8). And in another place it is said that 'the Spirit of the Lord hath filled the whole world' (Wis. 1:7). Do you suppose that the Holy Spirit so fills the world that, while he fills the earth, he is not in heaven?
「因她的潔淨,她遍達萬處,任何污穢之物都不能侵入她」(智七24、26);又說:「她大有能力地從這端達到那端,並溫柔地安排萬事」(智八1)。那麼「遍達萬處」是什麼意思,若不是充滿全體呢?她充滿萬有,正如父充滿萬有,聖靈也充滿萬有。因此蒙福的大衛說:「我往哪裡去躲避你的靈?我往哪裡逃避你的面?我若升到天上,你在那裡;我若下到陰間,你也在那裡」(詩一三八7-8)。又在別處說:「主的靈充滿了世界」(智一7)。難道你以為聖靈充滿世界,是這樣充滿的:當他充滿大地時,卻不在天上嗎?
13:49
Sed vide quid in alio loco idem liber Sapientiæ conti- neat: ibi enim dicitur Deo : Quæ in cœlis sunt autem quis investigabit ? Sensum autem tuum quis scivit, nisi dederis sapientiam, et miseris Spiritum tuum de altissi­ mis (Sap. ix, 16, 17) ? Agnosce itaque unam esse immensitatem Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti; quia Trinitas unus est Deus, qui omnia creavit; et uni­ versa quæ fecit, aeternitate atque incommutabilitate sapientiae suae ac virtutis excedit. Hoc utique videns dicebat beatus Apostolus : Pax Dei quæ exsuperat omnem. intellectum, custodiat corda vestra, et intelli­ gentias vestras in Christo Jesu (Philip. iv, 7). 589 FRAGMENTUM IX. Tres personœ sunt unus Dominus Deus noster.
But observe what the same book of Wisdom contains in another place; for there it is said to God: 'And the things that are in the heavens, who shall search out? And who shall know thy mind, unless thou give wisdom, and send thy Spirit from on high?' (Wis. 9:16-17). Acknowledge therefore that one is the immensity of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit; for the Trinity is one God, who created all things, and surpasses in the eternity and unchangeableness of his wisdom and power all the things which he has made. Seeing this indeed, the blessed Apostle used to say: 'The peace of God, which surpasseth all understanding, keep your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus' (Phil. 4:7). FRAGMENT IX. The three persons are our one Lord God.
但你要看那同一部智慧書在別處所載的內容;因為那裡對神說:「天上的事,誰能查究?你的心意,誰能知道,除非你賜下智慧,從至高處差來你的靈?」(智九16-17)。因此你要承認,父、子、聖靈的浩瀚無限乃是同一;因為三位一體是一位神,他創造了萬有,並以他智慧與能力的永恆與不變超越他所造的一切。蒙福的使徒正是看見了這一點,才說:「神所賜出人意外的平安,必在基督耶穌裡保守你們的心懷意念」(腓四7)。第九殘篇。三個位格乃是我們的一位主神。
13:50
Si ergo ita sentiendum est, quemadmodum dicis, ut Filius sit Deus noster, Pater vero sit Deus Dei nostri, nec tamen Pater et Filius naturaliter sit unus Dominus Deus noster; vide quomodo tuis verbis compellaris Deo Patri divinae servitutis obsequia denegare. Dicitur enim nobis : Audit Israel, Dominus Deus tuus, Dominus unus est (Deut. v!, 4). Et alio loco : Dominum Deum tuum adorabis, et illi soli ser­ vies (vers. 13). Nam et in Decalogo certum est hoc primum contineri mandatum : Ego sum Dominus Deus tuus , qui eduxri te de terra AEgypti, de domo servitutis (Exod. xx, 2). Dicit etiam David : Quis Deus prœter Dominum, aut quis Deus prœter Deum ',ostrum (Psal. XVII, 52)?
If, then, it must be understood as you say — namely, that the Son is our God, but the Father is the God of our God, and yet the Father and the Son are not by nature our one Lord God — see how by your own words you are compelled to deny to God the Father the homage of divine service. For it is said to us: 'Hear, O Israel, the Lord thy God, the Lord is one' (Deut. 6:4). And in another place: 'Thou shalt adore the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve' (Deut. 6:13). For in the Decalogue too it is certain that this is contained as the first commandment: 'I am the Lord thy God, who brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage' (Exod. 20:2). David also says: 'Who is God but the Lord? or who is God but our God?' (Ps. 17:32).
那麼,若必須照你所說的來理解——就是說,子是我們的神,而父是我們之神的神,然而父與子按本性卻不是我們的一位主神——你要看,你如何被自己的話所逼迫,竟向父神否認神聖敬拜的臣服。因為經上對我們說:「以色列啊,你要聽,主你的神是獨一的主」(申六4)。又在別處說:「你要敬拜主你的神,單要事奉他」(申六13)。因為在十誡中,這確實是第一條誡命所包含的:「我是主你的神,曾將你從埃及地、從為奴之家領出來」(出二十2)。大衛也說:「除了主以外,誰是神呢?除了我們的神以外,誰是神呢?」(詩十七32)。
13:51
Iste autem Dominus Deus noster, soli sibi altare præcepit construi, soli sibi hostias imperat immolari, dicens : Altare de terra facietis mihi, et offeretis super illud holocausta et va- cifica vestra (Exod. xx , 24). Nam et in eodem libro dicitur : Sacrificans diis eradicabitur, nisi Domino soli (Exod. XXII, 20). Quapropter, aut Patrem et Filium secundum divinam naturam unum Dominum Deum nostrum deposita iufidelitate cognosce; aut die Deo Patri exbibendum non esse quod soli Domino Deo nostro præcipiamur exhibere. Tu enim dixisti quia Deus noster est Filius, non est unus naturaliter Deus: dic nobis quem adorandum, et cui hostias exi­ stimes offerendas.
But this our Lord God commanded an altar to be built to himself alone, and commanded victims to be immolated to himself alone, saying: 'You shall make me an altar of earth, and shall offer upon it your holocausts and your peace offerings' (Exod. 20:24). For in the same book it is also said: 'He that sacrificeth to gods shall be rooted out, save only to the Lord' (Exod. 22:20). Wherefore either acknowledge, laying aside your unbelief, that the Father and the Son according to the divine nature are our one Lord God; or say that there ought not to be rendered to God the Father what we are commanded to render to the Lord our God alone. For you have said that, because our God is the Son, he is not by nature one God: tell us, then, whom you think we ought to adore, and to whom victims ought to be offered.
但這位我們的主神吩咐只為他自己建造祭壇,只命令將祭牲獻給他自己,說:「你要為我築一座土壇,在其上獻你的燔祭和平安祭」(出二十24)。因為在同一卷書中也說:「向別神獻祭的,除單向主獻的以外,必被剪除」(出二十二20)。因此你要麼放下不信,承認父與子按神聖本性乃是我們的一位主神;要麼就說:我們被命令單獨獻給我們主神的敬拜,不該獻給父神。因為你曾說:既然我們的神是子,他按本性就不是一位神:那就告訴我們,你認為我們該敬拜誰,又該向誰獻上祭牲。
13:52
Ei ne quem dicis Deum nostrum, aut ei quem Deum asseris Dei nostri? Necesse est autem ut secundum sensum tuum, aut præceptum legis abjicias, si soli sacrificandum existimas Patri; aut si legi obtemperas, soli Filio dicas hostias offe­ rendas. Secundum tuam quippe sententiam, non Deo Dei nostri, sed Deo nostro lex præcipit immolan­ dum. FRAGMENTUM X. Deus Pater Deus est Filii de ventre matris non de utero genitoris. Agnosce igitur secundum divinitatem unum Deum , esse Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum; et ei­ dem uni Deo, qui se præcipit a lidelibus coli, omnia juste servientis obsequia inseparabiliter exhiberi.
To him whom you call our God, or to him whom you assert is the God of our God? But according to your view it is necessary either that you cast away the precept of the Law, if you think that sacrifice ought to be offered to the Father alone; or, if you obey the Law, that you say victims ought to be offered to the Son alone. For according to your opinion, the Law commands that sacrifice be made not to the God of our God, but to our God. FRAGMENT X. God the Father is the God of the Son from the womb of the mother, not from the loins of the begetter. Acknowledge, therefore, that according to divinity there is one God, the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit; and that to that same one God, who commands himself to be worshipped by the faithful, all the homage of dutiful service is inseparably to be rendered.
是獻給你所稱為我們之神的那一位,還是獻給你所斷言為我們之神的神的那一位呢?按你的看法,必然要麼你拋棄律法的訓誡,若你認為只該向父獻祭;要麼你若順從律法,就得說祭牲只該獻給子。因為照你的意見,律法所命令獻祭的對象,不是我們之神的神,而是我們的神。第十殘篇。神父是子的神——乃是從母親的胎中,而非從生者的腹中。因此你要承認,按神性只有一位神,即父、子、聖靈;並且對這同一位神——他命令信徒敬拜他——一切恭順事奉的臣服都當不可分割地獻上。
13:53
Agnosce etiam Deum Patrem Deum esse Filii, non ex æternitate nativitatis divinæ , sed ex tempore hus manitatis assumptæ. Habet enim Deum Patrem Filius, Deum suum ; sed de ventre matris, 590 non de utero genitoris. Quod si non credis, ab ipso Cilio audi hujus mysterii veritatem, qui dicit in psalmo : De ventre matris meœ Deus meus ea tu (Psal. xxi, 11). Nam quia Deus Pater secundum naturam Pater est unigeniti Filii, noster autem Deus est : hoc ine­ narrabili bonitate, secundum consilium voluntatis suæ operatus est, ut pro nostra salute unigenito Filio suo, cui Pater est per naturam, esset Deus per gra­ tiam;
Acknowledge also that God the Father is the God of the Son, not from the eternity of the divine nativity, but from the time of the humanity that was assumed. For the Son has God the Father as his God; but from the womb of the mother, not from the loins of the begetter. And if you do not believe this, hear from the Son himself the truth of this mystery, who says in the psalm: 'From my mother's womb thou art my God' (Ps. 21:11). For because God the Father is by nature the Father of the only-begotten Son, but is our God: this, by unspeakable goodness, according to the counsel of his will, he brought to pass, that for our salvation he might become, through grace, the God of his only-begotten Son, to whom by nature he is Father;
你也要承認,神父是子的神——不是就神聖誕生的永恆而言,而是就所取的人性之時而言。因為子確有神父作他的神;但這是從母親的胎中,而非從生者的腹中。你若不信這事,就從子自己那裡聽這奧祕的真理,他在詩篇中說:「從我母親的胎中,你就是我的神」(詩二十一11)。因為神父按本性乃是獨生子的父,卻是我們的神:這事乃是他以無可言喻的美善,按他旨意的計劃所成就的,為了我們的救恩,使他藉恩典成為他獨生子的神——他按本性乃是那子的父;
13:54
et nobis, quibus Dens est per naturam, digna­ retur Pater esse per gratiam FRAGMENTUM XI. Christus vere Deus noster. Æstimatio in Scripturis duplex, incertœ cognitionis et certæ scientiæ. Chri­ stus non est Deus Manichœorum. Judæorum. Aria­ norum. Beati Cypriani accipiamus et amplectamur utique sententiam , qui scribens ad Quirinum , in libro se- cundo , capitulo sexto , sub titulo : QUOD DEUS SIT CHRISTUS, inter alia testimonia etiam hoc protulit : Hic Deus noster, et non deputabitur alius absque illo : qui invenit omnem viam prudentiæ, et dedit eam Jacob puero suo , et Israel dilecto sibi. Post hœc in terris visus est, et cum hominibus conversatus est (Baruch III, 36, 37, 38).
and that to us, to whom he is God by nature, he might deign to be Father through grace. FRAGMENT XI. Christ is truly our God. Estimation in the Scriptures is twofold: of uncertain knowledge and of certain knowledge. Christ is not the God of the Manichaeans, of the Jews, or of the Arians. Let us assuredly accept and embrace the opinion of blessed Cyprian, who, writing to Quirinus, in the second book, chapter six, under the title THAT CHRIST IS GOD, among other testimonies brought forth also this: 'This is our God, and no other shall be accounted beside him: who hath found out all the way of knowledge, and hath given it to Jacob his servant, and to Israel his beloved. After this he was seen upon the earth, and conversed with men' (Bar. 3:36-38).
並且對我們——他按本性是我們的神——他竟俯就藉恩典作我們的父。第十一殘篇。基督真是我們的神。聖經中的「認定」有兩種:不確定之知識的認定,與確定之知識的認定。基督不是摩尼教徒、猶太人或亞流派的神。讓我們務要接受並擁抱蒙福的居普良的見解——他寫信給奎里努斯,在第二卷第六章,標題為「基督是神」,在眾多見證之中也提出了這一段:「這是我們的神,除他以外不算為別神:他尋見了一切智慧之道,並將其賜給他僕人雅各,賜給他所愛的以色列。此後他在地上被人看見,並與人同住」(巴錄書三36-38)。
13:55
Agnosce testimonio tanti martyris, de Christo dictum : Hic Deus noster, et non æstima­ bitur alius absque illo; et disce ut divina dicta recte intelligas, et non adversus Dei Filium rebellis exi­ stas. Mysterium enim divinæ incarnationis beatus propheta volebat ostendere. Undc necesse eum fuit ut et Deum nostrum, ad quem alius non æstimabitur, secundum divinitatem Christum diceret, et eumdem in terris visum secundum veram carnis substantiam prophetaret. A fidelibus enim non æstimatur (id est non creditur, non accipitor, non putatur) alius abs­ que Dei Filio Deus : quia Deus non personse nomen est, sed natura.
Acknowledge, by the testimony of so great a martyr, that this was said concerning Christ: 'This is our God, and no other shall be esteemed beside him'; and learn to understand the divine sayings rightly, and not to stand as a rebel against the Son of God. For the blessed prophet wished to show forth the mystery of the divine incarnation. Whence it was necessary for him both to call Christ our God, beside whom no other shall be esteemed, according to divinity, and to prophesy that the same one was seen on earth according to the true substance of the flesh. For by the faithful no other God is esteemed (that is, is believed, is received, is thought) beside the Son of God: because 'God' is not the name of a person, but of a nature.
你要憑這位偉大殉道者的見證承認,這話是論基督說的:「這是我們的神,除他以外不算為別神」;並要學會正確理解神聖的言語,不要作神子的叛逆者。因為蒙福的先知乃是要顯明神聖成肉身的奧祕。因此他必然既要按神性稱基督為我們的神——除他以外不算為別神,又要按肉身真實的實質預言這同一位在地上被人看見。因為在信徒看來,除了神子以外不算為別神(就是說,不信、不接受、不視之為):因為「神」不是位格的名稱,而是本性的名稱。
13:56
Si ergo naturam attendimus, quia Pater et Filius' et Spiritus sanctus unus est Deus, hoc est una natura; sicut absque Patre non aestima­ tur alius Deus, sic absque Filio non aeslimatur alius Deus, sic etiam absque Spiritu sancto non æstimatur alius Deus. Ideo ergo absque Dei Filio non potest alius Deus a fidelibus aestimari, quia extra naturam Filii Dei, quæ illi cum Patre et Spiritu sancto una est, nullatenus potest alius Deus inveniri. Beatus itaque Jeremias, hoc testimonio arguens Arianos, simul cum eis et Manichæos arguit, et Judaeos : ut et Manichæi Deum Christum, quem credunt in terris visum, et cum hominibus conversatum, credant ipsum dedisse legem populo Judacorum;
If, then, we attend to the nature, since the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are one God, that is, one nature; just as apart from the Father no other God is esteemed, so apart from the Son no other God is esteemed, so likewise apart from the Holy Spirit no other God is esteemed. Therefore, apart from the Son of God no other God can be esteemed by the faithful, because outside the nature of the Son of God, which is one with the Father and the Holy Spirit, no other God can in any way be found. And so blessed Jeremiah, refuting the Arians by this testimony, at the same time with them refutes also the Manichaeans and the Jews: so that the Manichaeans, too, may believe that this same God-Christ, whom they believe to have been seen on earth and to have conversed with men, gave the Law to the people of the Jews;
那麼,我們若留意本性,既然父、子、聖靈是一位神,即一個本性;正如除父之外不算為別神,照樣除子之外不算為別神,同樣除聖靈之外也不算為別神。因此,在信徒看來,除神子之外不能算為別神,因為在神子的本性之外——這本性與父和聖靈是同一的——絕不能找到別的神。所以蒙福的耶利米以這見證駁斥亞流派時,同時也連他們一併駁斥了摩尼教徒和猶太人:好叫摩尼教徒也相信這位神即基督(他們相信他曾在地上被看見、與人同住)就是那將律法賜給猶太民族的那一位;
13:57
et Judaei, a quo datam te­ gein populo Israel et credant et praedicant, ipsum esse Dei Filium, eumdemque in terris visum, et cum hominibus conversatum sacramento 591 incarna­ tionis agnoscant. Non enim frustra beatus Propheta dixit : Post hæc in terris visus est: nisi utique ut ostenderet, post haec , id est, postquam dedit viam disciplinae Jacob puero suo , et Israel dilecto suo : post haec utique in terris visus est. Ut ostenderet tunc non fuisse visum quando legem per angelos de­ dit, quam dicit Apostolus : Ordinatam per angelos in manu mediatoris (Gal. III, 19); sed tunc utique visum quando semetipsum exiuanivit, formam servi acci­ piens.
and that the Jews both believe and proclaim that he, by whom the Law was given to the people of Israel, is the same Son of God, and may acknowledge that the same one was seen on earth and conversed with men in the sacrament of the incarnation. For not in vain did the blessed prophet say: 'After this he was seen upon the earth': except assuredly to show that after this — that is, after he gave the way of instruction to Jacob his servant, and to Israel his beloved — after this indeed he was seen on earth. So as to show that he was not then seen when he gave the Law through angels, of which the Apostle says: 'Ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator' (Gal. 3:19); but was assuredly seen then when he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant.
又叫猶太人既相信又宣揚:那將律法賜給以色列民的那一位,就是神子,並要在成肉身的聖禮中承認這同一位曾在地上被人看見、與人同住。因為蒙福的先知並非徒然地說:「此後他在地上被人看見」:這無疑是要顯明,此後——就是說,在他將訓誨之道賜給他僕人雅各、賜給他所愛的以色列之後——此後他確在地上被人看見。這是要顯明:當他藉天使賜下律法時,他尚未被看見——關於這律法,使徒說:「是藉天使、在中保手中設立的」(加三19);乃是當他虛己、取了奴僕的形像時才確被看見。
13:58
Idcirco enim accepit formam servi, ut videri posset, et cum hominibus conversa'i Deus hic noster, praeter quem non potest alius aestimari. Æstimatio autem duobus modis poni assolet in Scripturis. Dici­ tur enim aestimare, sive qui aliquid putat quod non est, sive qui certissime scit esse quod est. Ad aesti­ mationem incertae cognitionis pertinet quod beatus Siephanus dicit de sancto Moyse, in Actibus aposto- lorum : Existimabat autem intelligere fratres, quoniam Deus per manum ipsius daret salutem illis (Act. VII, 25). Quam aestimationem ut incertam monstraret, adjecit : At illi non intellexerunt. Similiter in eodem libro, cum beatum Petrum de carcere angelus edu­ xisset, dicitur :
For to this end he took the form of a servant, that he might be able to be seen, and conversed with men — this our God, beside whom no other can be esteemed. But 'estimation' is wont to be used in two ways in the Scriptures. For one is said to esteem, whether it be he who thinks something to be which is not, or he who most certainly knows that to be which is. To the estimation of uncertain knowledge belongs what blessed Stephen says of holy Moses, in the Acts of the Apostles: 'And he thought that his brethren understood that God by his hand would give them salvation' (Acts 7:25). And to show that this estimation was uncertain, he added: 'But they understood it not.' Likewise in the same book, when the angel had led blessed Peter out of prison, it is said:
因為他取奴僕的形像正是為此目的:使他能被人看見,並與人同住——這位我們的神,除他以外不能算為別神。但「認定」一詞在聖經中慣以兩種方式使用。因為說一人「認定」,既可指他以為某物存在而其實不存在,也可指他極確定地知道那存在之物確實存在。屬於不確定之知識的認定,就是蒙福的司提反在使徒行傳中論到聖摩西所說的:「他以為弟兄們必明白神是藉他的手施行拯救」(徒七25)。為了表明這認定是不確定的,他又補充說:「他們卻不明白。」同樣在這卷書中,當天使領蒙福的彼得出監時,經上說:
13:59
Et nesciebat quia verum est quod fie­ bat per angelum9 œstimabat autem se visum videre • (Act. xu, 9). Nomine autem æstimationis certissima scientia ponitur in libro Sapientiae, ubi dicitur de ipsa Sapientia : Et si multitudinem quis scientiœ de::­ derat, scit præterita et de futuris æstimat (Sap. VIII, 8). Quid est autem Sapientiac æstimare , nisi certissime scire ? Unde et Paulus sensum Christi habens, quod se aestimare dicebat, certissime noverat, unde ait : Existimo enim quod non sunt condignce passiones hu- jus temporis , ad futuram gloriam quæ revelabitur in nobis (Rom. VIII, 18). Neque enim in Paulo rerum istarum dicenda est incerta cognitio, sed certa scien­ tia.
'And he knew not that it was true which was done by the angel; but he thought he saw a vision' (Acts 12:9). But by the name of 'estimation,' most certain knowledge is set down in the book of Wisdom, where it is said of Wisdom herself: 'And if a man desire much knowledge, she knoweth things past, and formeth an estimate of things to come' (Wis. 8:8). But what is it for Wisdom to esteem, if not most certainly to know? Whence Paul too, having the mind of Christ, that which he said he esteemed, he most certainly knew, when he says: 'For I esteem that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory to come, that shall be revealed in us' (Rom. 8:18). For in Paul the knowledge of these things is not to be called uncertain, but certain.
「他卻不知道由天使所行的是真的,只以為看見了異象」(徒十二9)。但「認定」一詞在智慧書中乃指極確定的知識,那裡論智慧本身說:「人若渴慕許多知識,她曉得過去的事,也推斷將來的事」(智八8)。那麼智慧的「認定」是什麼意思,若不是極確定地知道呢?因此,具有基督心思的保羅,他所說他「認定」的,其實他是極確定地知道,正如他說:「我認定,現今的苦楚若比起將來要顯於我們的榮耀,是不足介意的」(羅八18)。因為在保羅裡面,對這些事的知識不該稱為不確定的,而是確定的。
13:60
Tale est igitur et quod beatus Jeremias dixit de Christo : Hic. Deus noster, et non æstimabitur alius præter illum (Baruch III, 36). Quid est enim non æstimabitur, nisi non scietur ? Inde est quod beatus Isaias ait : Domine, præter te, alium non novimus : nomen tuum invocavimus (Isai. xxvi, 13). Hic est ergo Deus noster , id est Deus Christianorum , qui præter ipsum alium non aestimant Deum. Non est Deus Ma­ nichæorum, qui eum legem dedisse non credunt. Non est Deus Judaeorum, qui eum non credunt Deum vivum, sed hominem mortuum. Non est Deus Aria­ norum, qui eum cum Patre non credunt unum esse naturaliter Deum.
Such, therefore, is also what blessed Jeremiah said concerning Christ: 'This is our God, and no other shall be esteemed beside him' (Bar. 3:36). For what is 'shall not be esteemed,' if not 'shall not be known'? Hence it is that blessed Isaiah says: 'O Lord, beside thee we have known no other: thy name we have invoked' (Isa. 26:13). This, therefore, is our God — that is, the God of Christians — who beside him esteem no other God. He is not the God of the Manichaeans, who do not believe that he gave the Law. He is not the God of the Jews, who do not believe him to be the living God, but a dead man. He is not the God of the Arians, who do not believe him to be with the Father one God by nature.
因此,蒙福的耶利米論基督所說的也是這樣:「這是我們的神,除他以外不算為別神」(巴錄書三36)。「不算為」是什麼意思,若不是「不被認識」呢?由此,蒙福的以賽亞說:「主啊,除你以外我們未曾認識別的;我們稱揚你的名」(賽二十六13)。因此這位就是我們的神——即基督徒的神——除他以外他們不算別的神為神。他不是摩尼教徒的神,因他們不信他頒賜了律法。他不是猶太人的神,因他們不信他是活神,反以他為一個死去的人。他不是亞流派的神,因他們不信他與父按本性乃是一位神。
13:61
Praeter Christum enim alterum Deum aestimant, qui alteram naturam Patris, alteram Filii praedicant : et quia hoc non habet Christianus, sed hæreticus sensus, propterea sic aestimantium nec Pater potest Deus esse nec Filius. Illorum enim Cbri­ stus Deus esse cognoscitur, a quibus Deus alius naturaliter nullatenus æstimatur. EX LIBRO IV. DE CULTU PATRIS, ET FILU, ET SPIRITUS SANCTI. 592 FRAGMENTUM XII. Sumus templum Dei Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti. Illis debetur a nobis servitus. Sic autem sumus templum Dei Patris et Spiritus sancti, ut templum simus et Filii. Certum est enim templum Dei dici eliam domum Dei. Unde propheta dicit:
For beside Christ they esteem another God, they who preach one nature of the Father, another of the Son: and because this is not the Christian, but the heretical sense, therefore in the case of those who so esteem, neither can the Father be God nor the Son. For his God is Christ known to be, by whom no other God is by nature in any way esteemed. FROM BOOK IV. ON THE WORSHIP OF THE FATHER, AND OF THE SON, AND OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. FRAGMENT XII. We are the temple of God the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. To them is service due from us. But we are so the temple of God the Father and of the Holy Spirit that we are the temple also of the Son. For it is certain that the temple of God is also called the house of God. Whence the prophet says:
因為那些傳講父有一個本性、子有另一個本性的人,就是在基督以外認定了另一位神:既然這不是基督徒的觀念,而是異端的觀念,所以對那些如此認定的人而言,父不能是神,子也不能是神。因為基督被認作神,乃是在那些絕不按本性認定別神的人當中。摘自第四卷。論敬拜父、子、聖靈。第十二殘篇。我們是父、子、聖靈的殿。我們當事奉他們。但我們既是父神與聖靈的殿,也是子的殿。因為神的殿確實也被稱為神的家。因此先知說:
13:62
Ego autem in multitudine misericordiæ tuæ in­ troibo in domum tuam, adorabo ad templum sanctum tuum in timore tuo (Psal. v, 8). Nam et ipse Salvator, cum de templo vendentes et ementes ejiceret, ipsam templum domom nuncupans ait: Scriptum est, Domus mea domus orationis vocabitur; vos autem fecistis eam speluncam latronum (Matth. XXI, 43). Domum autem Christi nos esse apostolica testatur auctoritas, ubi dicilur : Christus autem tanquam filius in domo sua, quæ domUs nos sumus (Hebr. III, 6). Apparet ergo Spiritum sanctum naturaliter esse Deum ; quando­ quidem sic sumus templum Spiritus sancti, sicut su mus lemplum Patris et Filii.
'But as for me, in the multitude of thy mercy I will come into thy house; I will worship toward thy holy temple in thy fear' (Ps. 5:8). For the Savior himself too, when he cast out of the temple those who sold and bought, calling that same temple a house, said: 'It is written, My house shall be called a house of prayer; but you have made it a den of thieves' (Matt. 21:13). But that we are the house of Christ, the apostolic authority attests, where it is said: 'But Christ as a Son in his own house, which house are we' (Heb. 3:6). It appears, therefore, that the Holy Spirit is by nature God; since we are so the temple of the Holy Spirit, as we are the temple of the Father and of the Son.
「至於我,我要憑你豐盛的慈愛進入你的家;我要存敬畏你的心向你的聖殿下拜」(詩五8)。因為救主自己也是這樣:當他把買賣的人趕出聖殿時,稱那殿為家,說:「經上記著說:我的家必稱為禱告的家;你們倒使它成為賊窩」(太二十一13)。而我們是基督的家,這有使徒的權柄作證,那裡說:「但基督為兒子,治理神的家;我們若……便是他的家了」(來三6)。因此顯明聖靈按本性乃是神;既然我們是聖靈的殿,正如我們是父與子的殿。
13:63
Et quoniam nec duorum vel trium deorum possumus templum esse, neque no - bis licet creaturam colere, vel creaturae servire, id est λατρίιαν exhibere ; propterea digne unum Deum colimus, non solum Patrem, nec solum Filium, nec solum Spiritum sanctum; sed ipsam Trinitatero, Pa- trem, et Filium, et Spiritum sanctum. Alioquin dis. cerne templa , ut discernas et merita : et dic in qui­ bus habeat Pater templum, in quibus Filius, in quibus Spiritus sanctus. Quod utique non discrevit Aposto­ lus, qui in una eademque Epistola, quos dixit esse templum Dei, ipsos dixit esse templum Spiritus san­ cti : quos etiam dicens membra Christi, ostendit esse templum Christi.
And since we can be the temple neither of two nor of three gods, nor is it lawful for us to worship a creature, or to serve a creature — that is, to render latreia — therefore we worthily worship one God, not the Father alone, nor the Son alone, nor the Holy Spirit alone; but the Trinity itself, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Otherwise, distinguish the temples, that you may also distinguish the merits: and say in which the Father has a temple, in which the Son, in which the Holy Spirit. Which the Apostle assuredly did not distinguish, who in one and the same Epistle said that those whom he called the temple of God were themselves the temple of the Holy Spirit: whom also, calling them members of Christ, he showed to be the temple of Christ.
既然我們不能作兩位或三位神的殿,我們也不可敬拜受造之物,或事奉受造之物——就是獻上「拉特雷亞」(λατρεία,至高的敬拜)——所以我們理當敬拜一位神,不是單敬拜父,也不是單敬拜子,也不是單敬拜聖靈;而是三位一體本身,即父、子、聖靈。不然的話,你就分別那些殿,好叫你也分別那些功德:說父在哪些人裡有殿,子在哪些人裡有殿,聖靈在哪些人裡有殿。使徒斷然沒有這樣分別,他在同一封書信中說:他所稱為神殿的那些人,本身就是聖靈的殿:他又稱他們為基督的肢體,藉此顯明他們是基督的殿。
13:64
Ipse enim in eadem rursus Epistola dicit: Vos estis corpus Christi et membra (I Cor. XII, 26). Propter quod alibi dicit : Quia membra sumus corporis ejus, de carne ejus, et de ossibus ejus Ephes. v, 30). Ipse autem Salvator noster, corpus suum vide quomodo templum appellet, dicens : Solvite semplum hoc, et in tribus diebus excitabo illud (Joan. II, 19). Beatus autem evangelista, de quo templo dixisset ostendens, ait: Ipse autem dicebat de templo corporis sui (Joan. n,2i). Ideo ergo sumus templum Dei, quia mem­ bra sumus corporis Christi. Templum autem sumus Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti. Non tribus dispar, Patri, et Filio, et creaturæ Spiritui sancto;
For he says again in the same Epistle: 'You are the body of Christ, and members' (1 Cor. 12:27). Wherefore elsewhere he says: 'For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones' (Eph. 5:30). But see how our Savior himself calls his own body a temple, saying: 'Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up' (John 2:19). And the blessed evangelist, showing of what temple he had spoken, said: 'But he spoke of the temple of his body' (John 2:21). Therefore we are the temple of God, because we are members of the body of Christ. And we are the temple of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Not of three unequal ones — the Father, and the Son, and the creature the Holy Spirit;
因為他在同一封書信中又說:「你們就是基督的身子,並且各自作肢體」(林前十二27)。因此他在別處說:「因我們是他身上的肢體,是他的骨他的肉」(弗五30)。你且看救主自己如何稱他自己的身體為殿,說:「你們拆毀這殿,我三日內要再建立起來」(約二19)。蒙福的福音書作者顯明他所指的是哪座殿,說:「但他這話是以他的身體為殿說的」(約二21)。因此我們是神的殿,因為我們是基督身體的肢體。並且我們是父、子、聖靈的殿。並非三個不相等者的殿——即父、子、和作為受造之物的聖靈;
13:65
sed ipsi Trinitati uni Deo, cujus sumus templum, illi exhiben­ tes servitutis obsequium. Quam nobis non licet, nec uni Deo, cujus templum sumus, aliquatenus denega­ re ; nec Deo cujus templum non sumus exhibere. II­ lud omnimodis observantes, quod dictum est: Domi­ num 593 Deum tuum adorabis, et illi soli servies (Deut. VI, 13). Ipsa servitus Græce λατρέια dicitur, quæ soli vero Deo jure ac legitime, non a pertidis, sel a catholicis fidelibus exbibetur. Unde quosdam culpat Apostolus, qui commutaverunt veritatem Dei in mendacium, et coluerunt, et servierunt creaturas potius quam Creatori (Rom. I, 25).
but of the Trinity itself, the one God, whose temple we are, rendering to him the homage of service. Which it is not lawful for us in any way to deny to the one God, whose temple we are; nor to render it to a god whose temple we are not. Observing in every way that which was said: 'Thou shalt adore the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve' (Deut. 6:13). This service itself is in Greek called latreia, which is rendered by right and by law to the true God alone — not by the faithless, but by catholic believers. Whence the Apostle blames certain ones 'who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator' (Rom. 1:25).
而是三位一體本身,即那一位神,我們是他的殿,向他獻上事奉的臣服。這臣服我們絕不可向那位我們作其殿的一位神否認;也不可向那位我們並非其殿的神獻上。我們要在一切事上遵守所說的:「你要敬拜主你的神,單要事奉他」(申六13)。這事奉本身在希臘文中稱為「拉特雷亞」(λατρεία),乃是按正理與律法只獻給真神——不是由不信的人,而是由大公信徒獻上的。因此使徒責備某些人「將神的真實變為虛謊,去敬拜事奉受造之物,過於敬拜事奉那造物的主」(羅一25)。
13:66
Sic autem iste locus in Græco habetur eloquio, ϰαί ἑσεύσθησαν, ϰαί ὲλάτρευ­ σον τη̃ ϰτίσει παρά τὸν ϰτίσαντα . Cernis nempe illos ab Apostolo graviter denotari, qui λατρείαν soli Creatori debitam cuiquam exhibuerint (al. exhibuerunt) crea­ turæ. Istam porro creaturæ culturam quæ λατρεία nuncupatur, ostendens beatus Apostolus, maxime in sacrificiorum immolatione constare, cum vellet Co­ rinthios a commessatione immolatitiæ carnis arcere, sic ait : Propter quod, carissimi mihi, fugite ab ido­ lcrum cultura. Ut prudentibus loquor, vos judicate quod dico. Calix benedictionis cui benedicimus, nonne communicatio sanguinis Christi est ?
This passage is thus rendered in the Greek speech: kai esebasthesan, kai elatreusan te ktisei para ton ktisanta. You see indeed that those are gravely censured by the Apostle who have rendered to any creature the latreia due to the Creator alone. Moreover, the blessed Apostle, showing that this worship of the creature which is called latreia consists chiefly in the immolation of sacrifices, when he wished to keep the Corinthians from the eating of sacrificial flesh, thus said: 'Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from the worship of idols. I speak as to wise men; judge you what I say. The chalice of benediction which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ?'
這段話在希臘文中是這樣的:καὶ ἐσεβάσθησαν, καὶ ἐλάτρευσαν τῇ κτίσει παρὰ τὸν κτίσαντα。你確實看見,那些將只該獻給造物主的「拉特雷亞」(λατρεία)獻給任何受造之物的人,被使徒嚴嚴地譴責了。此外,蒙福的使徒指明這稱為「拉特雷亞」的對受造之物的敬拜主要在於獻祭,當他要阻止哥林多人吃祭偶像之物時,這樣說:「所以我親愛的弟兄啊,你們要逃避拜偶像的事。我好像對明白人說的,你們要審察我的話。我們所祝福的福杯,豈不是同領基督的血嗎?」
13:67
et panis quem frangimus, nonne participatio corporis Domini est (1 Cor, x, 14, 15, 16)? Et infra, ostendens quam idolo­ rum culturam dixisset, a qua eos jubebat ut fuge­ rent, ait: Non potestis calicem Domini bibere9 et cali­ cem dæmoniorum: non potestis mensœ Domini parti­ cipes esse, et mensæ damoniorum (Ibid. 20, 21). Ap­ paret itaque illam culturam quae λατρεία dicitur, 1 maxime in sacrificiis inveniri. Nam et illud quod paulo ante commemoravimus, dixisse beatum Aposto­ lum, Fugite ab idolorum cultura, idololatria in Græ­ co posita est. Qui locus sic se habet, ϕεύγετε ὰπὸ τη̃ς , . FRAGMENTUM XIII. Qui differant λατρεία et δούλευσις . Αατρείαν ergo sola sibi vera divinitas vindicat;
'and the bread which we break, is it not the partaking of the body of the Lord?' (1 Cor. 10:14-16). And further on, showing what worship of idols he had spoken of, from which he bade them flee, he says: 'You cannot drink the chalice of the Lord and the chalice of devils; you cannot be partakers of the table of the Lord and of the table of devils' (1 Cor. 10:21). It appears, therefore, that this worship which is called latreia is found chiefly in sacrifices. For that too which we recalled a little before, that the blessed Apostle said, 'Flee from the worship of idols,' is in the Greek set down as idololatria. Which passage stands thus: pheugete apo tes... FRAGMENT XIII. In what latreia and douleusis differ. Latreia, then, the true divinity alone claims for itself;
「我們所擘開的餅,豈不是同領主的身體嗎?」(林前十14-16)。他在下文顯明他所說的、要他們逃避的是何種拜偶像的事,說:「你們不能喝主的杯又喝鬼的杯,不能同領主的筵席又同領鬼的筵席」(林前十21)。因此顯明,這稱為「拉特雷亞」的敬拜主要見於獻祭之中。因為我們稍前所提及蒙福使徒所說的「你們要逃避拜偶像的事」,在希臘文中乃寫作「εἰδωλολατρία」(拜偶像)。那段經文是這樣的:φεύγετε ἀπὸ τῆς……第十三殘篇。「拉特雷亞」(λατρεία)與「杜留西斯」(δούλευσις,服事)有何區別。那麼,「拉特雷亞」是只有真神性才為自己所主張的;
13:68
δούλευσις vero, et Deo est quantum oportet reddenda, et hominibus quantUm condecet exhibenda. Propter λατρείαν ergo dicitur : Sacrificate Deo sacrificium justitiæ (Psal. iv, 6); et, Satrificans diis eradicabitur, nisi Domino soli (Exod. XXII, 40). Propter δούλευσιν vero dicit Apostolus : Domino Christo servite ( Colo... 1 III, 24); et iterum : Servite invicem in caritate (Galat. v, 13). Rursus idem apostolus, cum de escis loquere­ tur quae idolis immolantur, propter λατρείαν dixit: Nobis autem unus Deus Pater, ex quo omnia, et nos in ipso; et unus Dominus noster Jesus Christus, per quem omnia, et nos per ipsum (I Cor. VIII, 6). Propter δούλευσιν vero dicit: Paulus servus Christi Jesu (Rom.
but douleusis is both to be rendered to God as much as is fitting, and to be shown to men as much as is becoming. Therefore because of latreia it is said: 'Sacrifice to God the sacrifice of justice' (Ps. 4:6); and, 'He that sacrificeth to gods shall be rooted out, save only to the Lord' (Exod. 22:20). But because of douleusis the Apostle says: 'Serve the Lord Christ' (Col. 3:24); and again: 'Serve one another in charity' (Gal. 5:13). Again the same Apostle, when he was speaking of the foods which are immolated to idols, said because of latreia: 'But to us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord our Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him' (1 Cor. 8:6). But because of douleusis he says: 'Paul, servant of Christ Jesus' (Rom.
但「杜留西斯」(δούλευσις)既要按合宜的程度獻給神,也要按得體的程度向人表現。因此為了「拉特雷亞」,經上說:「你們要獻公義的祭給神」(詩四6);又說:「向別神獻祭的,除單向主獻的以外,必被剪除」(出二十二20)。但為了「杜留西斯」,使徒說:「你們要服事主基督」(西三24);又說:「你們要用愛心互相服事」(加五13)。這同一位使徒論到那祭偶像之物時,又為了「拉特雷亞」說:「然而我們只有一位神,就是父,萬物都本於他,我們也歸於他;並有一位主,就是耶穌基督,萬物都是藉著他有的,我們也是藉著他有的」(林前八6)。但為了「杜留西斯」,他說:「基督耶穌的僕人保羅」(羅
13:69
I, 1); et fidelibus loquens, ait: Non enim nosmetipos prædicamus, sed Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum, nos autem servos vestros per Jesum (11 Cor. IV, 5). 594 FRAGMENTUM XIV. Cum Dei Filius dicitur, non sola Chriati deitas, sed etiam humanitas significatur. Idem est Christus qui Jesus Chriatus. Ego igitur illa quae tibi visum est sub nomine meo falsis gestis inserere nec sensi, nec dixi. Avertat enim Deus et longe'faciat istum perversum ac mor­ tiferum sensum a corde fidelium. Quis enim, non dico stultus, sed prorsus insanus, audeat credere vel di­ cere, cum Dei Filius dicitur, solam deitatem Cbristi evidentius significari ?
1:1); and speaking to the faithful, he says: 'For we preach not ourselves, but Jesus Christ our Lord, and ourselves your servants through Jesus' (2 Cor. 4:5). FRAGMENT XIV. When the Son of God is spoken of, not the deity of Christ alone, but also the humanity is signified. The same is Christ who is Jesus Christ. I, then, those things which it seemed good to you to insert under my name into false records, I neither held nor said. For may God avert and put far away that perverse and death-dealing sense from the heart of the faithful. For who — I say not foolish, but utterly insane — would dare to believe or to say that, when the Son of God is spoken of, only the deity of Christ is more evidently signified?
一1);他對信徒說:「因為我們原不是傳自己,乃是傳基督耶穌為主,並且自己因耶穌作你們的僕人」(林後四5)。第十四殘篇。當提到神子時,不僅指基督的神性,也指其人性。這位基督與那位耶穌基督乃是同一位。因此,你認為合適以我的名義插入偽造文件中的那些話,我既未持守,也未說過。願神驅除並遠遠除去這乖謬而致死的觀念,使其離開信徒的心。因為誰——我不說愚昧的,而是全然瘋狂的——敢相信或說:當提到神子時,只是更明顯地指基督的神性呢?
13:70
cum utique idem Dei Filius non solum secundum divinitatem, sed etiam secundum carnem, non tantum Dei Filius, sed etiam Deus pro­ pheticis prædicetur eloquiis. Claret quippe Filium Dei, non secundum divinitatem, sed secundum hu­ manitatem, unctum esse Spiritu sancto : et tamen cum qui unctus est, Deum beatus David appellat, dicens : Unxit te Deus, Deus tuus, oleo exaultationis prae participibus tuis (Psal. XLIV, 8). Aut quis dicat, ' quia ubi ponitur Jesus, hominis tantum persona de- claretur ; ubi vero ponitur Jesus Christus, jam plus ibi humanitatis quam deitalis partes exsuperent ? Cum utique beatus Apostolus dicat: Hoc sentite in vobis, quod et in Christo Jesu.
since indeed the same Son of God is proclaimed by the prophetic oracles not only according to divinity, but also according to the flesh, not only Son of God, but also God. For it is clear that the Son of God was anointed with the Holy Spirit, not according to divinity, but according to humanity: and yet him who was anointed, blessed David calls God, saying: 'God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows' (Ps. 44:8). Or who would say that where 'Jesus' is set down, the person of a man only is declared; but where 'Jesus Christ' is set down, there now the parts of humanity exceed those of the deity? Since indeed the blessed Apostle says: 'Have this mind in you, which was also in Christ Jesus.'
既然這同一位神子藉先知的言語被宣告,不但按神性,也按肉身,不但是神子,也是神。因為顯明神子受聖靈的膏,不是按神性,而是按人性:然而蒙福的大衛稱那受膏者為神,說:「神啊,你的神用喜樂的油膏你,勝過膏你的同伴」(詩四十四8)。或者誰會說:凡寫著「耶穌」之處,只宣示人的位格;而凡寫著「耶穌基督」之處,那裡人性的成分就超過神性的成分呢?既然蒙福的使徒說:「你們當以基督耶穌的心為心。」
13:71
Qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse se æqualem Dee; sed semetipsum exinanivit formam servi accipiens, in similitudinem honunum factus, et habitu inventus ut homo (Philip. II, 5, 6, 7). Videsne Jesum Christum in forma Dei ? lesum Christum se exinanisse, et for­ Mam servi accepisse? Jesum Christum in similitudi­ nem hominum factum, et habitu inventum ut homi­ nem ? Hæc autem omnia quis fecit, nisi Unigenitus Deus? Item dicit Apostolus : Unus Dominus Jesus Christus, per. quem omnia, et nos per ipsum (I Cor. VIII, 6). Quis est autem Jesus Christus per quem omnia, nisi de quo dicit evangelista : In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum.
'Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God; but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men, and in habit found as a man' (Phil. 2:5-7). Do you see Jesus Christ in the form of God? Jesus Christ who emptied himself, and took the form of a servant? Jesus Christ made into the likeness of men, and in habit found as a man? But all these things — who did them, if not the only-begotten God? Likewise the Apostle says: 'One Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him' (1 Cor. 8:6). But who is Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, if not he of whom the evangelist says: 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.'
「他本有神的形像,不以自己與神同等為強奪的;反倒虛己,取了奴僕的形像,成為人的樣式,並且有人的樣子」(腓二5-7)。你看見那本有神形像的耶穌基督嗎?看見那虛己、取了奴僕形像的耶穌基督嗎?看見那成為人的樣式、有人的樣子的耶穌基督嗎?但這一切是誰做的,若不是那獨生的神呢?使徒同樣說:「有一位主,就是耶穌基督,萬物都是藉著他有的,我們也是藉著他有的」(林前八6)。那藉他有萬物的耶穌基督是誰呢,若不是福音書作者所論的那一位:「太初有道,道與神同在,道就是神。」
13:72
Hoc erat in principio apud Deum. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil (Joan. i, i, 2, 5) ? Quoniam igitur Jesus Christus unus esl Deus et homo, propterea sive cum de seipso loquitur, sive cum de illo loquuntur apostoli, nusquam istam discretionem faciunt, quam tu inaniter in illa tuorum falsitate gestorum facere voluisti. Nam ipse Salvator noster, sicut totum se Dei Filium, sic totum se Filium hominis nuncupat. Cum enim cæco nato quem illu­ minaverat dixisset : Tu credis in Filium Dei? et ille respondisset : Quis est, Domine, ut credam in cum ? sic ei respondit ipse Dei Filius : Et vidisti eum, et qui loquitur tecum ipse eat (Joan. IX, 35, 36, 37).
'The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him, and without him was made nothing' (John 1:1-3)? Since, therefore, Jesus Christ is one God and man, therefore whether when he speaks of himself, or when the apostles speak of him, nowhere do they make that distinction which you have vainly wished to make in that falsity of your records. For our Savior himself, as he calls himself wholly the Son of God, so he calls himself wholly the Son of man. For when he had said to the man born blind whom he had enlightened: 'Dost thou believe in the Son of God?' and he had answered: 'Who is he, Lord, that I may believe in him?' the Son of God himself thus answered him: 'Thou hast both seen him, and it is he that talketh with thee' (John 9:35-37).
「這道太初與神同在。萬物是藉著他造的;凡被造的,沒有一樣不是藉著他造的」(約一1-3)?因此,既然耶穌基督是一位神又是人,所以無論當他論自己,或當使徒論他時,他們絕不作那種分別——就是你在你偽造文件的謬妄中徒然想作的分別。因為我們的救主自己,正如他稱自己全然是神子,照樣也稱自己全然是人子。因為當他對那個蒙他開了眼的生來瞎眼之人說:「你信神子嗎?」那人回答說:「主啊,誰是神子,叫我信他呢?」神子自己就這樣回答他:「你已經看見他,現在和你說話的就是他」(約九35-37)。
13:73
Nun­ quid tunc sola illi deit3s locuta est, aut solam ille deitatem vidit et adoravit? Non utique. Quia ipse Dominus Jesus in utraque natura 595 unus est Dei Filius. Qui de se rursus dicit: Nemo ascendit in cœ- lum, nisi qui de cœlo descendit, Filius hominis qui est in cœlo (Joan. III , 13). Quod tamen non utrum­ que secundum solam carnem dixit. Nam eodem tem­ pore carnem suam non in coelo habuit, sed in terra : ct tamen Filius hominis fuit, non solum in terra, sed eliam in coclo : sccundum solam scilicet carnem in sola terra; secundum divinitatem vero, et in coelo, et in terra : utrumque tamen inseparabiliter unus hominis Filius. Ipse enim Jesus Christus unus est Dei et hominis Filius.
Was it then only his deity that spoke to him, or did he see and adore only the deity? By no means. For the Lord Jesus himself is in both natures one Son of God. Who says again of himself: 'No man hath ascended into heaven, but he that descended from heaven, the Son of man who is in heaven' (John 3:13). Yet he did not say either of these according to the flesh alone. For at that same time he had his flesh not in heaven, but on earth: and yet he was the Son of man, not only on earth, but also in heaven: according to the flesh alone, that is, on earth alone; but according to divinity, both in heaven and on earth: yet in both inseparably one Son of man. For the same Jesus Christ is one Son of God and of man.
那時難道只是他的神性向他說話,或他只看見並敬拜了神性嗎?絕不是。因為主耶穌自己在兩性之中乃是一位神子。他又論到自己說:「除了從天降下仍舊在天的人子,沒有人升過天」(約三13)。然而他這兩點都不是單按肉身說的。因為那時他的肉身不在天上,而在地上:然而他是人子,不但在地上,也在天上:按肉身而言,只在地上;但按神性而言,既在天上,也在地上:兩者卻不可分割地是一位人子。因為這同一位耶穌基督乃是一位神子又是人子。
← prev partnext part →
← ch. 12ch. 14 →
12345678910111213141516

Tell me when new readings are published

One email per new chapter reading. Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe.