📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Anti-Arian Works

Fulgentius of Ruspe

Anti-Arian Works 6 part 8/24

Latin original · 37 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 6:262–6:298 (886 verses in all)

← ch. 5ch. 7 →
← prev partnext part →
6:262
te vero, propter divinarum ignorantiam litterarum, quibus minus instructus es, non invenisse quid eis in defensionem veræ fidei responderes. Hoc in te itaque primitus in nomine Domini laudo, quia si tibi non fuit tanta respondendi (al. respondenti) fa­ cultas, permansit tamen in corde tuo veritatis firma (al. firmissima credulitas. Non enim omnes qui Christi participes sunt, -etiam respondendo possunt defensarequod credunt; sed etiam illa pars est pro. recto victoriæ, ut quandiu quis sermone non potest defendere veritatem, fideli tamen corda devitet erro. rem.
but that you, because of your ignorance of the divine letters, in which you are less instructed, did not find what to answer them in defense of the true faith. This therefore I first praise in you in the name of the Lord, that although you had not so great a facility of answering, nevertheless there remained in your heart a firm belief of the truth. For not all who are partakers of Christ are able also by answering to defend what they believe; but even that is part of a right victory, that so long as one cannot defend the truth by speech, he yet by a faithful heart avoids error.
但你因不熟悉神聖的經文,在其上受教較少,就沒有尋見當如何回答他們,為真信仰辯護。因此,我首先奉主的名為此稱讚你,就是你雖沒有那麼大的答辯能力,然而在你心中卻仍存有對真理堅定的信念。因為並非凡有分於基督的人,都能藉答辯來護衛所信的;然而這也算作真勝利的一部分,就是一個人雖不能用言語護衛真理,卻仍以忠信的心避開謬誤。
6:263
Expedit autem ut saluberrima Petri apostoli verba sectemur, præcipientis ut simus parati semper ad respondendum otnni poscenti nos rationem de fide et spe quæ in nobis est (1 Pet. III, i , Volens ergo ad respondendum paratior inveniri, petis ut nostro instructus sermone agnoscas quemadmodum hæreticis, fidem nostram impugnare volentibus, divinis valeas armatus eloqniis cobviare. 3. Proinde illud admoneo (al. commoneo) princi­ paliter teneas : sanctam Trinitatem, id est, Patrem, et Filium , et Spiritum sanctum , naturaliter verum (forte unum) esse Deum, summum, verum et bonum. unius naturae, unius essentiæ, unius omnipotentiæ, unius bonitatis, unius aeternitatis, unius immensitatis ; .
It is expedient, moreover, that we follow the most salutary words of the Apostle Peter, who enjoins that we be always prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks of us a reason for the faith and hope that is in us (1 Pet. 3:15). Wishing therefore to be found readier for answering, you ask that, instructed by our discourse, you may know how, armed with the divine oracles, you may be able to withstand the heretics who wish to assail our faith. 3. Accordingly, I admonish you to hold this chiefly: that the holy Trinity, that is, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, is by nature one true God, supreme, true and good, of one nature, of one essence, of one omnipotence, of one goodness, of one eternity, of one immensity;
再者,我們務要遵循使徒彼得那極有益的話,他吩咐我們常作準備,以便有人問我們心中盼望與信仰的緣由,就可以回答(彼前三15)。所以你既願被人看出更能答辯,就求你受我們言論的教導,好使你藉神聖的聖言武裝起來,能抵擋那些願攻擊我們信仰的異端。三、因此,我勸你首要地持守這一點:聖三位一體,就是聖父、聖子、聖靈,按本性乃是獨一的真神,至高、真實而美善,同一本性、同一本質、同一全能、同一美善、同一永恆、同一無限;
6:264
ac sic cum unum Deum audis Patrem, et Filium, et Spiritum sanctum, unam naturam summæ illius Trinitatis intellige; et cum Trinitatem audis, Pa­ trem, et Filium, et Spiritum sanctum, tres personas unius summæ illius divinitatis agnosce. Tres enim personæ sunt, Pater, et Filius, et Spiritus sanctus ; ideo Trinitas dicitur : sed una substantia est Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti ; ideo ipsa Trinitas unus Deus veraciter a fidelibus prædicatur. CAP. III. Tres personæ, non tres naturæ. Æqualitas in Trinitate. Scripturæ testimonia quod Trinitas sit unus Deus. Testimonia pro tribus personis perperam assignantur soli Patri ab hæreticis. Filius quoque Do­ minus Deus dicitur.
and thus, when you hear one God, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, understand the one nature of that supreme Trinity; and when you hear the Trinity, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, acknowledge three persons of that one supreme divinity. For there are three persons, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit; therefore it is called the Trinity: but there is one substance of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit; therefore that same Trinity is truly proclaimed by the faithful to be one God. CHAPTER 3. Three persons, not three natures. Equality in the Trinity. Testimonies of Scripture that the Trinity is one God. Testimonies for the three persons are wrongly assigned by the heretics to the Father alone. The Son also is called Lord God.
如此,當你聽見獨一的神——聖父、聖子、聖靈——時,要明白那至高三位一體的同一本性;當你聽見三位一體——聖父、聖子、聖靈——時,要承認那獨一至高神性的三個位格。因為有三個位格,聖父、聖子、聖靈;所以稱為三位一體:但聖父、聖子、聖靈只有同一實體;所以這同一三位一體被信徒真實地宣認為獨一的神。第三章:三個位格,而非三種本性。三位一體中的同等。聖經證明三位一體乃獨一神的見證。那些為三位格作證的經文被異端錯誤地單歸於聖父。聖子也被稱為主神。
6:265
Quis debet dici Christianus.Ado­ randus est et Filius.—4. Tres itaque personas esse Patrem , et Filium, et Spiritum sanctum, ostendunt ipsius eloquia Veritatis. Unde Salvator noster ait : Non sum solus, sed ego et qui misit me Pater (Joan, VIII, 16). De Spiritu sancto quoque dicit: Ego rogabo Patrem, et alium paracletum dabit vobis, Spiritum veritatis (Joan. XIV, 16, 17). Præcepit etiam baptizari gentes in nomine Patris , et Filii, et Spiritus sancti (Matth. XXVIII , 19). His atque hujusmodi testimoniis ostenditur, Patrem, et Filium, et Spiritum sanctum, tres esse personas, sed non tres esse naturas.
Who ought to be called a Christian. The Son also is to be adored. — 4. That the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit are three persons, the oracles of Truth Himself show. Whence our Savior says: 'I am not alone, but I and the Father who sent me' (John 8:16). Concerning the Holy Spirit also He says: 'I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Paraclete, the Spirit of truth' (John 14:16-17). He also commanded the nations to be baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:19). By these and suchlike testimonies it is shown that the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit are three persons, but are not three natures.
誰當被稱為基督徒。聖子也當受敬拜。——四、聖父、聖子、聖靈乃是三個位格,這真理本身的聖言就顯明了。故此我們的救主說:「我不是獨自一人,還有差我來的父與我同在。」(約八16)論到聖靈祂也說:「我要求父,父就另外賜給你們一位保惠師,就是真理的靈。」(約十四16-17)祂也吩咐要奉父、子、聖靈的名給萬民施洗(太廿八19)。藉這些以及諸如此類的見證,就顯明聖父、聖子、聖靈乃是三個位格,卻不是三種本性。
6:266
Unde Trinitas illa sancta digne creditur in personis, tres autem deos dici, Patrem, et Filium, et Spiritum sanctum , non permittit unitas naturalis. Et quia in una natura # Trinitatis nulla potest esse diversitas, ideo in tribus personis manet inconfusa proprietas et in unitate naturæ regnat incommutabiliter sub. stantialis aequalitas. Ideo de 199 Filio dicitur : Qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse se æqualem Deo (Philip. II, 6). Et : Quia non so­ lum solvebat sabbatum , sed et Patrem suum dicebat Deum, æqualem se faciens Deo (Joan. v, 18). Ad hanc æqualitatem naturæ virtutisque, etiam illud pertinet quod ipse Filius ait :
Whence that holy Trinity is worthily believed in respect of persons; but that three gods be spoken of—the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit—the natural unity does not permit. And because in the one nature of the Trinity there can be no diversity, therefore in the three persons an unconfused propriety remains, and in the unity of nature a substantial equality reigns unchangeably. Therefore of the Son it is said: 'Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God' (Phil. 2:6). And: 'Because He not only broke the Sabbath, but also called God His own Father, making Himself equal to God' (John 5:18). To this equality of nature and of power there pertains also that which the Son Himself says:
故此那聖三位一體按位格而言,被人合宜地相信;但要說有三位神——聖父、聖子、聖靈——本性的合一卻不容許。並且因為在三位一體的同一本性中不能有任何差異,所以在三個位格中存留著不相混淆的特性,而在本性的合一中,實體的同等不變地掌權。因此論到聖子說:「祂本有神的形像,不以自己與神同等為強奪的。」(腓二6)又說:「因為祂不但犯了安息日,並且稱神為祂自己的父,將自己和神當作平等。」(約五18)論到這本性與能力的同等,還有聖子自己所說的這話也屬於此:
6:267
Quia quæcunque Pater facit, hæc eadem et Filius similiter facit h. Et sicut Pater suscitat mortuos et vivificat, sic et Filius quos vult vi­ vificat (Ibid., 19, 21). In illa ergo 1 Trinitatis na­ tura , sic totum unum est, ut nihil ibi possit vel sc- parari vel dividi : sic totum aequale est, ut nihil ibi majus aut minus J valeat inveniri. Istum nobis unum Deum Novi et Veteris Testamenti veridica demon­ strat auctoritas; de hoc enim uno Deo beatus Moyses . dicit: Aud;, Israel : Dominus Deus tuus Deus (al. Dominus) unus est; et : Dominum Deum tuum adora­ bis, et illi soli servies (Deut. vi, 4), Et ipse Domi­ nus dicit de se: Videte quod ego sum Deus k et non est alius præter me (Deut.
'For whatsoever the Father does, these same things the Son likewise does. And as the Father raises the dead and gives life, so also the Son gives life to whom He will' (ibid. 19, 21). In that nature of the Trinity, therefore, the whole is so one that nothing there can be either separated or divided; the whole is so equal that nothing there can be found greater or less. This one God the truthful authority of the New and Old Testament demonstrates to us; for of this one God the blessed Moses says: 'Hear, O Israel: the Lord your God is one God'; and: 'You shall adore the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve' (Deut. 6:4). And the Lord Himself says of Himself: 'See that I am God, and there is no other besides me' (Deut.
「因為父所作的事,子也照樣作。父怎樣叫死人起來,使他們活著,子也照樣隨自己的意思使人活著。」(同上19、21)所以在三位一體的那本性中,整全是如此為一,以致其中沒有甚麼能被分開或分割;整全是如此同等,以致其中不能尋見有甚麼為大或為小。這獨一的神,新舊約真實的權威向我們顯明;因為論到這獨一的神,蒙福的摩西說:「以色列啊,你要聽,耶和華你的神是獨一的神」;又說:「你要敬拜耶和華你的神,單要事奉祂。」(申六4、13)主自己也論到自己說:「你們看看,惟有我是神,除我以外並無別神。」(申
6:268
XXXII, 39). De hoc et. beatus David dicit : Quis Deus præter Dominum, aut quis Deus præter Deum nostrum (Psal. xvn, 32) ? Sanctus quoque Jacobus apostolus , istum unum Deum præ­ dicans, art, Tu credis quia unus est Deus, bene facis ; et dæmones credunt, et contremiscunt (Jac. II, 19). 5. Verumtamen non ignoramus isla testimonia, et si qua similia in divinis a reperiantur eloquiis, qui­ bus unus et solus asseritur Deus, non ipsi sanctæ Trinitati, sed uni tantum personæ , id est soli Dco Patri b, ab hxrelicis assignari. Proinde illorum quae proposuimus testimoniorum c, id est illius quo dici­ tnr : Audi, Israel : Dominus Deus tuus Deus (al. Do minus) unus est;
32:39). Of this the blessed David also says: 'For who is God but the Lord, or who is God but our God?' (Ps. 17:32). The holy Apostle James also, proclaiming this one God, says: 'You believe that there is one God; you do well; the demons also believe, and tremble' (James 2:19). 5. Nevertheless, we are not ignorant that these testimonies, and any similar ones that may be found in the divine oracles, by which one and only God is asserted, are assigned by the heretics not to the holy Trinity itself, but to one person only, that is, to God the Father alone. Therefore, of those testimonies which we have set forth—that is, of that in which it is said: 'Hear, O Israel: the Lord your God is one God;'
卅二39)論到這事,蒙福的大衛也說:「除了耶和華,誰是神呢?除了我們的神,誰是磐石呢?」(詩十八31)聖使徒雅各也宣揚這獨一的神,說:「你信神只有一位,你信得不錯;鬼魔也信,卻是戰驚。」(雅二19)五、然而我們並非不知道,這些見證,以及在神聖聖言中所能尋見任何類似的、藉以主張獨一無二之神的見證,被異端所歸的並非那聖三位一體本身,而是單歸於一個位格,就是單歸於父神。因此,論到我們所陳明的那些見證——就是那句所說的:「以色列啊,你要聽,耶和華你的神是獨一的神;」
6:269
et alterius , quo legitur Dominum Deum tuum adorabis, et illi soli servies ; in quantum, ipso Domino Deo donante, possumus, intelligentiam requiramus. Primum quippe nos testimonium po­ suisse meminimus illud quo dicitur : Audi, Israel : Dominus Deus tuus, Deus (al. Dominus) unus est. Hoc itaque sic utrique d fatemur esse firmissimum, ut ab hoc testimonio nullus existimet aliquatenus receden­ dum. 6. Proinde quoniam duos deos a lidclibus coli re­ gula præcepti hujus nulla ratione permittit: aut Patrem et Filium credant unum naturaliter Deum, si volunt sine hnjus transgressione mandati unum Deum sic colere, ut nec Patrem colant sine Filio, nec Filium sine Patre ;
and the other, in which it is read: 'You shall adore the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve'—let us, insofar as the Lord God Himself grants, seek their understanding. We recall that we set down first that testimony in which it is said: 'Hear, O Israel: the Lord your God is one God.' This, therefore, we confess to be so most firm for both, that from this testimony let no one think that we must in any way depart. 6. Accordingly, since the rule of this precept in no way permits two gods to be worshiped by the faithful: either let them believe the Father and the Son to be by nature one God, if they wish, without transgression of this commandment, so to worship one God as neither to worship the Father without the Son, nor the Son without the Father;
另一句所讀的:「你要敬拜耶和華你的神,單要事奉祂」——就讓我們照著主神自己所賜的,盡力尋求其中的意義。我們記得我們首先所列的,是那句所說的:「以色列啊,你要聽,耶和華你的神是獨一的神。」因此,我們承認這話對兩者都是極其穩固的,以致無人可以想像應以任何方式離棄這見證。六、因此,既然這條誡命的準則絕不容許信徒敬拜兩位神:那麼,他們或當相信聖父與聖子按本性乃獨一的神,若他們願意不違背這誡命而敬拜獨一的神,就當如此敬拜,以致既不離子而拜父,也不離父而拜子;
6:270
aut, quia Deus major et Deus minor, Deus unus esse non possunt (al. non possent), necesse est iii. aut Patrem solum Dpminum Deum suum dicant, at Filium Dominum Deum suum omnimodis negent; aut solum Filium Dominum Deum asserant c , et a Dei Patris cultura recedant. Sed Deum Patrem Do­ minum Deum suum negare non possunt, quem usque adeo Dominum Deum omnium esse confirmant, ut etiam ei divinitatem Filii, tanquam minoris, jure SCIO­ vitulis f subjugare contendant : 200 Filium vero, si Dominum Deum suum negare voluerint, ipsius pa­ ternæ vocis testimonio protinus arguuntur ; per os enim prophetæ , ex persona Dei Patris dicitur : Et domui Juda miserebor (al. misereor), et salvabo eo.
or—since a greater God and a lesser God cannot be one God—it is necessary either that they call the Father alone their Lord God, and in every way deny the Son to be their Lord God; or that they assert the Son alone to be Lord God, and withdraw from the worship of God the Father. But they cannot deny God the Father to be their Lord God, whom they so far affirm to be the Lord God of all things, that they even strive by right, as it were, to subject the divinity of the Son, as of a lesser, to Him under the yoke: yet the Son, if they should be willing to deny Him to be their Lord God, are at once refuted by the testimony of the paternal voice itself; for through the mouth of the prophet, in the person of God the Father, it is said: 'And I will have mercy on the house of Judah, and I will save them
或者——既然大神與小神不能是獨一的神——就必然是這樣:他們或單稱聖父為他們的主神,而全然否認聖子為他們的主神;或單主張聖子為主神,而離棄對父神的敬拜。但他們不能否認父神為他們的主神,他們既如此確認祂為萬有的主神,甚至憑所謂的權利,力圖將聖子的神性作為次等的,置於祂的軛下:然而聖子,他們若願否認祂為他們的主神,就立刻被父神之聲的見證所駁倒;因為藉先知的口,以父神的身分說:「我卻要憐憫猶大家,拯救他們,
6:271
in .Domino Deo suo (Ose. i, 7). Ipsum Dominum esse Deum nostrum Evangelicæ quoque veritatis com­ mendat auctoritas, ubi beati Thomæ apostoli confes­ sio pravitati hæreticæ prorsus contradicit, exclaman- iis atque dicentis : Dominus meus, et Deus meus L (J onn. xx.., 28). 7. Ergo quando et Patrem Dominum sine dubio confitentur, et Filium Dominum Dcum fateri propbe­ lica atque evangelica veritate coguntur, aut Patrem et Filium , personarum proprietate servata. unum Dominum Deum naturaliter dicant, aut confilenles solum Patrem sunm Dominum Deum, consequenter dicant Filium nec Dominum suum esse , nec Deum. Quod cum dixerint, nunquam se audebunt asserere Christianos :
in the Lord their God' (Hos. 1:7). That this same One is our Lord God, the authority of Evangelical truth also commends, where the confession of the blessed Apostle Thomas utterly contradicts heretical depravity, crying out and saying: 'My Lord and my God!' (John 20:28). 7. Therefore, when they without doubt both confess the Father to be Lord, and are compelled by prophetic and evangelical truth to confess the Son to be Lord God, either let them, the propriety of the persons preserved, call the Father and the Son by nature one Lord God; or, confessing the Father alone to be their Lord God, let them consequently say that the Son is neither their Lord nor God. And when they have said this, they will never dare to assert themselves Christians:
歸於耶和華他們的神。」(何一7)這同一位就是我們的主神,福音真理的權威也為此作證,在那裡蒙福的使徒多馬的認信全然駁斥異端的邪僻,他呼喊說:「我的主,我的神!」(約廿28)七、因此,當他們毫無疑問地既認信聖父為主,又被先知與福音的真理所迫承認聖子為主神,那麼,他們或當保守位格的特性,稱聖父與聖子按本性為獨一的主神;或若單認信聖父為他們的主神,就必然說聖子既非他們的主,也非神。他們一說這話,就永不敢自稱為基督徒:
6:272
cum utique Christianus a Christo nomen acceperit ;Christianus autem nullatenus esse possit , quisquis ipsam Christum Dominum Deum suum esse non dixerit. 8. Fateantur ergo Patrem et Filum non duos do­ minos deos g, sed unum Dominum Deum suum , si volunt veritatem tenere fidei, et nolunt rebelles præ­ ceptis legalibus atque evangelicis inveniri. Sic eniM poterunt (al. potuerunt) et illius testimonii , quo dic­ tum est : Dominum Deum tuum adorabis, et illi soli servies, intellectum pariter officiumque servare. Ne­ que enim cuiquam fas est sic adorare Deum Patrem, ut Deum Filium non adoret (al. adores), cum utique de ipso Filio scriptum sit in Deuteronomio :
since indeed a Christian has received his name from Christ; and no one can in any way be a Christian who has not confessed Christ Himself to be his Lord God. 8. Let them therefore confess the Father and the Son to be not two lord gods, but their one Lord God, if they wish to hold the truth of the faith, and are unwilling to be found rebels against the commandments both legal and evangelical. For thus they will be able to preserve alike the understanding and the duty of that testimony in which it was said: 'You shall adore the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve.' For it is lawful for no one so to adore God the Father as not to adore God the Son, since indeed of the Son Himself it is written in Deuteronomy:
因為基督徒的名確是從基督而得的;凡不認信基督自己為他的主神的,就絕不能算作基督徒。八、所以,他們若願持守信仰的真理,不願被發現是違背律法與福音之誡命的悖逆者,就當認信聖父與聖子並非兩位主神,乃是他們獨一的主神。因為如此,他們就能同時保守那見證所說的意義與本分:「你要敬拜耶和華你的神,單要事奉祂。」因為無人可以這樣敬拜父神,卻不敬拜子神,既然論到聖子自己,申命記中記著說:
6:273
Læta- mini ,cæli, simul cum eo , et adorent eum omnes a. geti Dei. De ipso quoque beatus David dicat in Psal-,mis mis h : Adorabunt eum omnes reges terræ, omnes gen­ tes servient ei (Psal. LXXI, 11). CAP. IV. Creatura nequaquam adoranda. Idololatræ veritatem Dei commutant in mendacium. — 9. Quod (al. quia) si Filius secundum divinitatem 1 unus Deus cum Patre non esset, unius cum eo naturae utique non fuisset; et si naturæ alterius esset, crea­ tura sine dubio esset. Si autem creatura esset, ser­ viendum ei sanctarum Scripturarum auctoritas non juberet, sed potius prohiberet.
'Rejoice, O heavens, together with Him, and let all the angels of God adore Him.' Of Him the blessed David also says in the Psalms: 'All the kings of the earth shall adore Him; all nations shall serve Him' (Ps. 71:11). CHAPTER 4. A creature is by no means to be adored. Idolaters change the truth of God into a lie. — 9. But if the Son according to His divinity were not one God with the Father, He would certainly not have been of one nature with Him; and if He were of another nature, He would without doubt be a creature. But if He were a creature, the authority of the holy Scriptures would not command that He be served, but would rather forbid it.
「諸天哪,要與祂一同歡呼,神的眾使者都要敬拜祂。」論到祂,蒙福的大衛在詩篇中也說:「地上的君王都要敬拜祂,萬國都要事奉祂。」(詩七十二11)第四章:受造之物斷不可敬拜。拜偶像者將神的真理變為謊言。——九、但聖子若按其神性不與聖父同為獨一的神,祂就必不與祂同一本性;祂若是另一本性,就無疑是受造之物。但祂若是受造之物,聖經的權威就不會吩咐要事奉祂,反倒會禁止。
6:274
In primo enim deca­ logi mandato , sicut unius Domini Dei cultura servi­ tusque manifestissime præcipitur , ita omni creaturæ adoratio ac servitus a fidelibus exhibenda vehemen- lissime prohibetur. Ibi enim dicitur : Ego sum Domi­ nus Deus tuus, qui eduxi te de terra Ægypti, de domo servitutis : Non erunt tibi dii absque me (Exod. xx, i, 5). Si hoc simul a Patre et Filio dictum accipitur, unus Dominus Deus credatur Pater et Filius : sed si hoc aut Pater sine Filio, aut sine Patre creditur dixisse Filius, necesse est ut aut Pater Dominus Deus ne­ getur, aut Filius. De illo enim qui dixi : Ego sum Dominus Deus tuus, qui eduxi te de terra Ægypti, de domo servitutis :
For in the first commandment of the Decalogue, just as the worship and service of the one Lord God is most manifestly enjoined, so the adoration and service of every creature is most vehemently forbidden to be rendered by the faithful. For there it is said: 'I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage: you shall have no gods besides me' (Exod. 20:1, 5). If this is taken to have been said at once by the Father and the Son, let the Father and the Son be believed one Lord God: but if this is believed to have been said either by the Father without the Son, or by the Son without the Father, it is necessary that either the Father be denied to be Lord God, or the Son. For of Him who said: 'I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage:
因為在十誡的第一條誡命中,正如極明顯地吩咐要敬拜、事奉獨一的主神,照樣也極嚴厲地禁止信徒向任何受造之物獻上敬拜與事奉。因為那裡說:「我是耶和華你的神,曾將你從埃及地、為奴之家領出來。除我以外,你不可有別的神。」(出二十1、5)這話若被視為聖父與聖子一同所說,那麼就當相信聖父與聖子是獨一的主神:但這話若被相信為或是聖父離子所說,或是聖子離父所說,就必然是這樣:或否認聖父為主神,或否認聖子為主神。因為論到那位說「我是耶和華你的神,曾將你從埃及地、為奴之家領出來:
6:275
Non erunt tibi dii absque me; de ipso sanctus Moyses ait: Audi, Israel : Dominus Deus s tuus Deus (al. Dominus) unus est (Deut. VI, 4). Et quia (at. et quod) ipse Deus sibi soli praecipiens tantummodo serviendum, seque jubens a fidelibus adorandum, prorsus interdixil ne quis auderet (al. audeat) creaturam adorare, creaturæque servire; propterea 201 in fine illius primi præcepti, de omnibus quæ creavit ita loquitur : Non adorabis ea, nec servies eis : ego enim sum Dominus Deus tuus (Exod. xx, 5). 10.
you shall have no gods besides me,' of Him holy Moses says: 'Hear, O Israel: the Lord your God is one God' (Deut. 6:4). And because that same God, commanding that He alone be served, and enjoining that He be adored by the faithful, utterly forbade that anyone should dare to adore a creature and to serve a creature; therefore, at the end of that first precept, concerning all the things which He created He thus speaks: 'You shall not adore them, nor serve them: for I am the Lord your God' (Exod. 20:5). 10.
除我以外,你不可有別的神」的那位,論到祂,聖摩西說:「以色列啊,你要聽,耶和華你的神是獨一的神。」(申六4)並且因為這同一位神,既吩咐當單單事奉祂,又命定當受信徒敬拜,就全然禁止任何人膽敢敬拜受造之物、事奉受造之物;因此,在那第一條誡命的末了,論到祂所創造的一切,祂如此說:「你不可跪拜那些像,也不可事奉它們,因為我是耶和華你的神。」(出二十5)十、
6:276
Quod ulique sciens beatus Aposlolus, iram Dei revelari pronuntiat super omnem impietatem et injus­ titiam eorum qui commutaverunt veritatem Dei in men­ daciam, et coluerunt et servierunt creaturæ potiut quam creatori, qui est benedictus in sæcula (Rom. I, 18,25). Veritatem Dei tenere est unum. Deum colere; veri­ tatem Dei in mendacium convertere est creaturae servire. Vera enim religio in unius constat veri Dei servitio. Ipsa namque veritas unus est Deus ; et sicut excepta una veritate non est alia veritas, sic abs­ que uno Deo vero non est alius verus Deus : ipsa enim una veritas est naturaliter una vera diviuitas.
Knowing this indeed, the blessed Apostle pronounces the wrath of God to be revealed against all impiety and injustice of those who have changed the truth of God into a lie, and have worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever (Rom. 1:18, 25). To hold the truth of God is to worship the one God; to convert the truth of God into a lie is to serve the creature. For true religion consists in the service of the one true God. For that same Truth is the one God; and just as, apart from the one Truth, there is no other truth, so, apart from the one true God, there is no other true God: for that same one Truth is by nature the one true divinity.
蒙福的使徒實在知道這事,就宣告神的忿怒要臨到那些將神的真理變為謊言、敬拜事奉受造之物、過於敬拜那可稱頌到永遠之造物主的人一切的不敬虔與不義(羅一18、25)。持守神的真理,就是敬拜獨一的神;將神的真理變為謊言,就是事奉受造之物。因為真宗教在於事奉獨一的真神。因為這同一位真理就是獨一的神;正如除了這獨一的真理以外並無別的真理,照樣除了這獨一的真神以外也並無別的真神:因為這同一位真理按本性就是獨一的真神性。
6:277
Et ita non possunt duo veri dii veraciter dici, sicut ipsa una veritas * naturaliter non potest dividiJ i CAP. v. Scriptura et Patrem et Filium, verum Deum prædicat. Homines sancti filii Dei sunt non eomodo quo Christus. Quis commutat veritatem Dei in menda­ cium. Quid sit ex superioribus argumentis concluden- dum. — ii. Sancta vero Scriptura, quæ nobis unum Dominum Deum veraciter salubriterque commendat, sicut Patrem verum Deum , sic et Filium verum Deum fidelibus cunctis insinuat. De Patre quippe di­ cit beatus Paulus apostolus, Thessalonicensibus scri­ bens : Conversi estis ad Dominum a simulacris b, ser­ vire Deo vivo et vero ;
And thus two true gods cannot truly be spoken of, just as that same one Truth cannot by nature be divided. CHAPTER 5. Scripture proclaims both the Father and the Son to be true God. Holy men are sons of God, but not in the way that Christ is. Who changes the truth of God into a lie. What is to be concluded from the foregoing arguments. — 11. But holy Scripture, which truly and salutarily commends to us one Lord God, just as it insinuates the Father to be true God to all the faithful, so also insinuates the Son to be true God. For concerning the Father the blessed Apostle Paul says, writing to the Thessalonians: 'You are turned to the Lord from idols, to serve the living and true God;
如此,兩位真神就不能被真實地稱說,正如這同一位真理按本性不能被分割。第五章:聖經宣揚聖父與聖子都是真神。聖徒是神的兒子,卻不像基督那樣。誰將神的真理變為謊言。從上述論證當得出甚麼結論。——十一、然而聖經真實而有益地向我們稱揚獨一的主神,正如它向眾信徒表明聖父為真神,照樣也表明聖子為真神。因為論到聖父,蒙福的使徒保羅寫信給帖撒羅尼迦人說:「你們是怎樣離棄偶像,歸向神,要服事那又真又活的神,
6:278
et exspectare Filium ejus de cælis, quem suscitavit a mortuis Jesum, qui eripuit nos ab ira ventura (I Thess. I, 9, 10). Hic Jesus Christus non sic est Dei Patris filius, sicut nos su­ mus : ille est enim proprius, nos redempti; ille na­ tu?, nos facti; ille verus, nos adoptivi. IHe antem, qui verus est filius, ipse etiam verus est Deus, non adoptione generatus, sed de Patre naturaliter natus. tn quo vero Deo veroque Filio, ideo est vera divi- nitas, quia naturalis est illi de Patre nalivitas. Pro­ pter quod eum e verum Patris Filium, verum Deum, vitamque æternam, beatus Joannes in Epistola sua profitetur, dicens :
and to await His Son from heaven, whom He raised from the dead, Jesus, who has delivered us from the wrath to come' (1 Thess. 1:9-10). This Jesus Christ is not the Son of God the Father in the way that we are: for He is proper, we are redeemed; He is by nature, we are made; He is true, we are adoptive. But He who is the true Son, He also is true God, not generated by adoption, but naturally born of the Father. And in Him, being true God and true Son, there is therefore true divinity, because natural to Him is His nativity from the Father. Wherefore the blessed John professes Him in his Epistle to be the true Son of the Father, true God, and life eternal, saying:
等候祂兒子從天降臨,就是祂從死裡復活的耶穌,這位救我們脫離將來忿怒的主。」(帖前一9-10)這位耶穌基督不是像我們一樣作父神的兒子:因為祂是本有的,我們是蒙救贖的;祂是本性的,我們是被造的;祂是真的,我們是被收納為義子的。但祂既是真兒子,祂也是真神,不是藉收納而生的,乃是本性上由父所生的。在這真神真兒子裡,之所以有真神性,乃因祂由父而生的本性是與生俱有的。因此蒙福的約翰在他的書信中稱祂為父的真兒子、真神、並永生,說:
6:279
Scimus quia Filius Dei venit, et dedit nobis intellectum, ut sciamus verum, et simus In vero Fitio ejus Jesu Christo. Hic est verus Deus, et vita æterna (1 Joan. v, 20). Verum itaque Deum colere, veroque Deo servire, non est utique verita­ tem Dei in mendacium commutare. Ille autem veri­ tatem Dei commutat in mendacium, qui Deo non ve­ ro existimat serviendum d; ille autem Deum non verum colit, et Deo non vero servit e, qui creaturo servierit, creaturamque coluerit : quia ubi Deus non verus colitur, et Deo non vero servitur f, ibi Dei ve­ ritas in mendacium commutatur. 12. Quoniam ergo, et Deum Patrem Deum verum, et Deum Filium Deum verum, coelestium eloquio­ rum attestatione cognoscimus;
'We know that the Son of God has come, and has given us understanding, that we may know the true One, and may be in His true Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and life eternal' (1 John 5:20). To worship the true God, therefore, and to serve the true God, is certainly not to change the truth of God into a lie. But that man changes the truth of God into a lie who thinks that service is to be rendered to a God who is not true; and that man worships a God who is not true, and serves a God who is not true, who has served a creature and worshiped a creature: because where God who is not true is worshiped, and a God who is not true is served, there the truth of God is changed into a lie. 12. Since, therefore, we recognize by the attestation of the heavenly oracles both God the Father to be true God, and God the Son to be true God;
「我們也知道神的兒子已經來到,且將智慧賜給我們,使我們認識那位真實的,我們也在那位真實的裡面,就是在祂兒子耶穌基督裡面。這是真神,也是永生。」(約壹五20)所以,敬拜真神、事奉真神,斷不是將神的真理變為謊言。但那以為當事奉一位非真之神的人,就是將神的真理變為謊言;那事奉受造之物、敬拜受造之物的人,就是敬拜非真之神、事奉非真之神:因為在敬拜非真之神、事奉非真之神的地方,那裡神的真理就被變為謊言。十二、所以,既然我們藉天上聖言的見證,認識父神為真神,子神也為真神;
6:280
aut unum verum Deum naturaliter Patrem et Filium cum catholicis asserant, aut duos veros deos a se coli, contra veri­ tatem sanctæ fidei dicant; aut creatura cultores seipsos profiteri non metuant, ut veritatem Dei se in mendacium commutasse ipsa rerum manifestatione cognoscant. Una quippe veritas unius veri Dei, imo una veritas, unus 202 verus Deus, non permittit servitutem atque culturam veri Dei creaturae con­ jungi g. Vera quoque religio, excepto uno vero Deo, nulli deo sinit cultura ac servitutis obsequium a fi­ delibus exhiberi. CAP. vi. Nulla creatura est veritas, sed vera. Filius in quo Patri æqualis. In quo minor. Duplex nativitas Christi, æterna et temporalis.
either let them, with the catholics, assert the Father and the Son to be by nature one true God; or let them say, against the truth of the holy faith, that two true gods are worshiped by them; or let them not fear to profess themselves worshipers of a creature, so that by the very manifestation of the matter they may recognize that they have changed the truth of God into a lie. For the one truth of the one true God—nay rather, the one truth, the one true God—does not permit the service and worship of the true God to be joined to a creature. True religion also, apart from the one true God, allows the homage of worship and service to be rendered by the faithful to no god. CHAPTER 6. No creature is truth, but is true. In what the Son is equal to the Father. In what He is less. The twofold nativity of Christ, eternal and temporal.
那麼,他們或當與大公信徒一同主張聖父與聖子按本性乃獨一的真神;或當違背聖信仰的真理,說有兩位真神被他們所敬拜;或當不懼怕自認為受造之物的敬拜者,好叫他們藉事情本身的顯明,認識自己已將神的真理變為謊言。因為獨一真神的獨一真理——不如說,那獨一的真理、那獨一的真神——不容許將對真神的事奉與敬拜歸於受造之物。真宗教也不容許信徒將敬拜與事奉的順服,獻與獨一真神以外的任何神。第六章:沒有受造之物是真理本身,乃是真實的。聖子在何事上與聖父同等,在何事上為次。基督的雙重誕生,永恆的與屬時間的。
6:281
Omnis autetn natura quæ minor est natura Dei Patris, sine dubio creata natura est h. Quid est autem cteata natura, nisi creatura ? Omnis porro creatura i quoniam opus est veritatis, est quidem creatura vera, non tamen est veritas. Sola enim (al. autem) naturaliter est veri­ tas, quæ naturaliter est vera divinitas. Illi ergo veri­ tatem Dei non commutant in mendacium, sed veræ fidei tenent salutare mysterium, qui nec solum Pa - trem, nec solum Filium, sed simul Patrem et Filium, unum Dominum Deum suum corde credunt ad ;u. stitiam, et ore confitentur ad salutem (Rom. x, 10).
— But every nature which is less than the nature of God the Father is without doubt a created nature. And what is a created nature but a creature? Furthermore, every creature, since it is the work of Truth, is indeed a true creature, yet is not truth. For that alone is by nature truth which is by nature true divinity. Those, therefore, do not change the truth of God into a lie, but hold the salutary mystery of the true faith, who believe in their heart unto righteousness, and confess with their mouth unto salvation (Rom. 10:10), not the Father alone, nor the Son alone, but the Father and the Son together, one Lord their God.
——但凡低於父神本性的一切本性,無疑都是受造的本性。而受造的本性若非受造之物,又是甚麼呢?再者,凡受造之物,既是真理的作為,固然是真實的受造之物,卻不是真理本身。因為惟有那按本性是真神性的,才按本性是真理。所以,那些不是將神的真理變為謊言,乃是持守真信仰之得救奧祕的人,就是那些心裡相信以致稱義、口裡承認以致得救(羅十10),所信的既非單是聖父,也非單是聖子,乃是聖父與聖子一同,是他們獨一的主神的人。
6:282
Quia non solum Pater Deus, sed etiam filius Deus naturaliter est verax Deus, veritas Deus, permanens cum Patre naturaliter unus verax, unus verus, una­ qne veritas : quia duos deos credi vel dici omniuo prohibet una veritas, quae sola vera est divinitas. 13. Proinde Deus Filius secundum divinam natu­ ram non est minor Patre, sed æqualis est Patri, quid j Filius ita verus Deus dicitur, ut Pater Deus verior non dicatur; in Deo enim vero nihil minus existi­ mari sinit ipsa veritatis agnitio. Permanet itaque in Patre et Filio naturaliter una verte divinitatis æqua- litas, et una incommutabilis ac sempiterna majestas.
For not only is the Father God, but also the Son is by nature true God, God who is truth, remaining with the Father by nature one true One, one true God, and one truth: because that one truth, which alone is the true divinity, altogether forbids two gods to be believed or spoken of. 13. Accordingly, God the Son according to the divine nature is not less than the Father, but is equal to the Father, because the Son is so called true God that the Father is not called a truer God; for in the true God the very recognition of truth allows nothing to be reckoned as less. There remains therefore in the Father and the Son by nature one true equality of divinity, and one unchangeable and everlasting majesty.
因為不但聖父是神,聖子按本性也是真神、是真理的神,與聖父同存為本性上獨一的真者、獨一的真神、獨一的真理:因為那獨一的真理,就是那惟一的真神性,全然禁止相信或稱說有兩位神。十三、因此,子神按其神聖本性並不小於聖父,乃是與聖父同等,因為聖子被稱為真神,以致聖父不被稱為更真的神;因為在真神裡,對真理的認識本身不容許有任何被視為次等的。所以在聖父與聖子裡,按本性存留著神性獨一的真同等,並獨一不變永存的威嚴。
6:283
Sic autem Filium Patri æqualem veraciter dicimus, ut etiam minorem veraciter non negemus. Scimus enim Deum Filium natum de natura Dei Patris, Da­ tum etiam de natura Virginis matris, ac per hoc ve­ rum Deum de veritate paternæ naturæ, verum homi­ nem de veritate maternae substantiæ : quem divini. tatis æternitas ostendit sine initio natum, et tempo­ ralis susceptio carnis docet sine dubio minoratum. Æqualis est Filius Patri, et minor est Filius Patre æqualis vera divinitate, minor vera humanitate Æqualis, quia In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum (Joan. I, 1) ; minor autem, quia Verbum caro factum est, et ha­ bitavit in nobis (Ibid., 14).
But we so truly call the Son equal to the Father that we also truly do not deny Him to be less. For we know God the Son to be born of the nature of God the Father, and also given of the nature of the Virgin Mother, and thereby true God of the truth of the paternal nature, true man of the truth of the maternal substance: whom the eternity of divinity shows to be born without beginning, and the temporal assumption of flesh teaches without doubt to be made less. The Son is equal to the Father, and the Son is less than the Father: equal by true divinity, less by true humanity. Equal, because 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God' (John 1:1); but less, because 'The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us' (ibid. 14).
但我們既真實地稱聖子與聖父同等,也真實地不否認祂為次等。因為我們知道子神是由父神的本性所生,也是由童貞聖母的本性所賜,因此祂由父性之真實乃是真神,由母性實體之真實乃是真人:神性的永恆顯明祂無始而生,而屬時間地取了肉身則無疑地表明祂成為次等。聖子與聖父同等,聖子又小於聖父:按真神性為同等,按真人性為次等。同等,因為「太初有道,道與神同在,道就是神」(約一1);次等,因為「道成了肉身,住在我們中間」(同上14)。
6:284
Æqualis, quia cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse se æqualem Deo (Philip. n, 6) ; minor autem, quia se metipsum exinanivit, formam servi accipiens (Ibid., 7). Æqualis est Patri Filius, quia de Domino natus est Dominus; minor est autem Patre Filius, quia de an­ cilla factus est servus Inde est quod dicit: De ven tre matris meæ, Deus meus es tu (Psal XXI, 11) Et iterum : 0 Domine, ego servus tuus, et filius ancillo tuæ (Psal. CXV, 6). Æqualis est Patri Filius, quia Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine Ipso factum est nihil (Joan. i, 3); minor est autem Patre Filius, quia factus est ex muliere, factus sub lege (Gal. IV, 4).
Equal, because 'being in the form of God, He thought it not robbery to be equal with God' (Phil. 2:6); but less, because 'He emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant' (ibid. 7). The Son is equal to the Father, because from the Lord was born the Lord; but the Son is less than the Father, because from a handmaid He was made a servant. Hence it is that He says: 'From my mother's womb You are my God' (Ps. 21:11). And again: 'O Lord, I am Your servant, and the son of Your handmaid' (Ps. 115:6). The Son is equal to the Father, because 'All things were made through Him, and without Him was made nothing' (John 1:3); but the Son is less than the Father, because 'He was made of a woman, made under the law' (Gal. 4:4).
同等,因為「祂本有神的形像,不以自己與神同等為強奪的」(腓二6);次等,因為「祂倒空了自己,取了奴僕的形像」(同上7)。聖子與聖父同等,因為由主生出了主;聖子又小於聖父,因為由婢女成了僕人。故此祂說:「我自出母胎,你就是我的神。」(詩廿二10)又說:「耶和華啊,我是你的僕人,是你婢女的兒子。」(詩一一六16)聖子與聖父同等,因為「萬物是藉著祂造的;凡被造的,沒有一樣不是藉著祂造的」(約一3);聖子又小於聖父,因為「祂為女子所生,且生在律法以下」(加四4)。
6:285
Et ideo sicut veraciter Dei Filius Deo Patri coæternus agnoscitur, sic veraciter matre posterior invenitur. 14. Primam quippe nativitatem Filii nullatenus praecessit æternitas Patris, cujus tamen secundam nativitatem præcessit temporalis nativitas 203 ma­ tris. In illa quippe natura Dei Patris, quæ esse non coepit, de æterno Patre coæternus est Filius inenar­ rabiliter natus; in natura Yirginis, quæ esse coepit ex tempore, de temporali matre temporaliter est idem Filius misericorditcr generatus. In ea itaque natura Dei Filius æqualis est Patri, in qua ante om­ pia coæternus est Patri; et in ea naLura est Filius Patre minor, in Qua est et matre posterior.
And therefore, just as the Son of God is truly acknowledged coeternal with God the Father, so He is truly found later than His mother. 14. For the eternity of the Father in no way preceded the first nativity of the Son, whose second nativity, however, the temporal nativity of the mother did precede. For in that nature of God the Father, which did not begin to be, the Son is ineffably born coeternal of the eternal Father; in the nature of the Virgin, which began to be in time, the same Son is mercifully generated in time of a temporal mother. In that nature, therefore, the Son of God is equal to the Father, in which before all things He is coeternal with the Father; and in that nature the Son is less than the Father, in which He is also later than His mother.
因此,正如神的兒子被真實地承認與父神同永,照樣祂也被真實地發現晚於祂的母親。十四、因為父的永恆絕未先於聖子的首次誕生,然而母親屬時間的誕生確先於聖子的第二次誕生。因為在父神那不曾開始存在的本性中,聖子由永恆的父不可言喻地與祂同永而生;在童貞女那按時間開始存在的本性中,這同一位聖子由屬時間的母親按時間而蒙憐憫地被生。所以,在那本性中,神的兒子與聖父同等,就是在萬有之先與聖父同永的那本性;在那本性中,聖子小於聖父,就是祂晚於祂母親的那本性。
6:286
In ea natura Patri aequalis est Filius, in qua creator est angelorum; in ea natura Patre minor est idem Filius, in qua Redemptor est hominum. In ea natura Patri aequalis est Filius, in qua ab initio creaturæ adoratur et laudatur ab augetis. In ea natura Filius minor est Patre in qua est minoratus paulo minus ab angelis a. CAP. VII. Minoratio in Christo ad naturam huma­ manam pertinet. — 15. Apostolica quippe auctoritas hujus monorationis non destitit demonstrare myste­ rium , dicens , Eum autem, qui modico quam angeli minoratus est, videmus Jesum propter passionem mor­ tis gloria et honore coronatum (Hebr. II, 9).
In that nature the Son is equal to the Father, in which He is the Creator of angels; in that nature the same Son is less than the Father, in which He is the Redeemer of men. In that nature the Son is equal to the Father, in which He is adored and praised by the angels from the beginning of creation. In that nature the Son is less than the Father, in which He was made a little lower than the angels. CHAPTER 7. The lessening in Christ pertains to the human nature. — 15. For the apostolic authority did not cease to demonstrate the mystery of this lessening, saying: 'But Him who was made a little lower than the angels, we see, Jesus, crowned with glory and honor because of the suffering of death' (Heb. 2:9).
在那本性中,聖子與聖父同等,就是祂作天使之創造者的那本性;在那本性中,這同一位聖子小於聖父,就是祂作人之救贖主的那本性。在那本性中,聖子與聖父同等,就是祂從創造之初被天使敬拜稱讚的那本性。在那本性中,聖子小於聖父,就是祂比天使被造得微小一點的那本性。第七章:基督裡的降卑是關乎人性的。——十五、因為使徒的權威不住地顯明這降卑的奧祕,說:「惟獨見那成為比天使小一點的耶穌,因為受死的苦,就得了尊貴榮耀為冠冕。」(來二9)
6:287
Supe­ rius autem cujus naturæ sit hæc assignanda minora­ tio, evidenter ostensura est, quando illud testimonium prophetae prolatum est, quo dicitur : Domine, quid est homo , quod memor ea ejus ; aut filius hominis, quoniam visitas eam ? Minorasti eum paulo minus ab angelis (Psal. VIII, 5). Dei ergo Filius ante susceptio­ nem carnis, cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam ar­ bitratus est esse se æqualem Deo (Philip. n, 6) , quia in illa forma Dei, Filius aequalis est Patri; quod si minor esset, in eadem forma Dei non esset: sed in forma Dei Filium esse apostolica testatur auctoritas. Ideo ergo æqualem Deo esse, non illi rapina fuerat, sed natura ;
But of what nature this lessening is to be assigned was above evidently shown, when that testimony of the prophet was brought forward, in which it is said: 'Lord, what is man, that You are mindful of him; or the son of man, that You visit him? You have made him a little lower than the angels' (Ps. 8:5). Therefore the Son of God, before the assumption of flesh, when He was in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God (Phil. 2:6), because in that form of God the Son is equal to the Father; but if He were less, He would not be in that same form of God: yet that the Son is in the form of God the apostolic authority attests. Therefore, to be equal to God was for Him not robbery, but nature;
但這降卑當歸於何種本性,上面已明白顯示,就是當那先知的見證被引出時,所說的:「主啊,人算甚麼,你竟顧念他;世人算甚麼,你竟眷顧他?你叫他比天使微小一點。」(詩八4-5)所以神的兒子,在取肉身之先,當祂本有神的形像時,不以自己與神同等為強奪的(腓二6),因為在那神的形像中,聖子與聖父同等;祂若是次等的,就不會在那同一神的形像中:然而聖子在神的形像中,這是使徒的權威所證的。因此,與神同等,對祂而言不是強奪,乃是本性;
6:288
quia in forma veri Dei non nisi verus esse potuit Deus, et divinæ formæ unitas ipsa est deitatis unius b naturalis æqualitas. Ubi ergo formæ unitas in natura erat, aequalitas rapina non erat. Naturalis autem divinitatis æqualitas, quae in forma Dei erat, auferri Deo vero non poterat. 16. lude est quod, retinens veritatem divinitatis, et veritatem accipiens carnis, unus idemque Dei et hominis filius, et Patre factus est minor, et Patri permansit æqualis. Ideo utrumque veraciter ipsa ve­ ritas dixit: et : Pater major me est (Joan. XIV, 28); <et: Ego et Pater unum sumus (Joan. x, 50). Vere ergo Deo Patre mioor est Christus, quia naturaliter ex patribus est secundum carnem ;
because in the form of the true God He could not but be true God, and the unity of the divine form is itself the natural equality of the one deity. Where, therefore, there was unity of form in nature, equality was not robbery. But the natural equality of divinity, which was in the form of God, could not be taken away from the true God. 16. Hence it is that, retaining the truth of divinity and receiving the truth of flesh, the one and same Son of God and of man both was made less than the Father, and remained equal to the Father. Therefore Truth Himself truly said both: 'The Father is greater than I' (John 14:28); and: 'I and the Father are one' (John 10:30). Truly, therefore, Christ is less than God the Father, because He is by nature of the fathers according to the flesh;
因為在真神的形像中,祂不能不是真神,而神聖形像的合一,本身就是那獨一神性的本性同等。所以,凡在本性中有形像之合一的地方,同等就不是強奪。但神性的本性同等,就是那在神的形像中的,不能從真神被奪去。十六、故此,這一位同時是神與人的兒子,既保有神性的真實,又領受肉身的真實,就既成為小於聖父,又存留為與聖父同等。因此真理本身真實地既說:「父是比我大的」(約十四28);又說:「我與父原為一」(約十30)。所以,基督真實地小於父神,因為祂按肉身而言,本性上是出於列祖的;
6:289
et vere Deo Pa­ tri aequalis est idem Christus, quia naturaliter est super omnia Deus benedictus in saecula. De ipso enim uno Christo Dei Filio beatus Apostolus ait: Quorum patres, et ex quibus Christus secundum car­ nem , qui est super omnia Deus benedictus in sæcula. Proinde vera fides, quae in uno eodemque Christo utriusque credit et confitetur substantiae veritatem, unum eumdemque Christum Dei Filium , et secun­ dum veritatem carnis factum praedicat minorem , et secundum veritatem divinitatis Deo Patri credit et confitetur aequalem.
and the same Christ is truly equal to God the Father, because He is by nature over all things God blessed forever. For of that one Christ, the Son of God, the blessed Apostle says: 'Whose are the fathers, and of whom is Christ according to the flesh, who is over all things God blessed forever.' Accordingly, the true faith, which in the one and same Christ believes and confesses the truth of both substances, proclaims the one and same Christ, the Son of God, both to be made less according to the truth of the flesh, and believes and confesses Him to be equal to God the Father according to the truth of divinity.
而這同一位基督真實地與父神同等,因為祂按本性乃是在萬有之上、永遠可稱頌的神。因為論到那一位基督,神的兒子,蒙福的使徒說:「列祖就是他們的祖宗,按肉體說,基督也是從他們出來的,祂是在萬有之上、永遠可稱頌的神。」因此,真信仰在這一位同一的基督裡,相信並認信兩種實體的真實,就宣揚這一位同一的基督,神的兒子,既按肉身之真實而成為次等,又按神性之真實相信認信祂與父神同等。
6:290
Sicque veraciter unum Deum cum Patre Filium vera fides adorat, quæ sic uni Deo novit a creaturis omnibus serviendum , ut noverit creaturæ non deberi divinæ c servitutis obsequium. 204 CAP. VIII. Spiritus sanctus non creatura, sed creator est. Spiritus sanctus est verus Deus. Templum Spiritus sancti sumus sicut Patris et Filii. Spiritus sanctus æqualis est Deo Patri et Filio. — ! i. Inde est, quod etiam Spiritum sanctum creatorem vera fides asserit, non creaturam. Quomodo enim crea­ tor esse negetur, a quo firmata cœlorum virtus osten­ ditur, dicente David : Verbo Domini cœli firmati sunt, et Spiritu oris ejus omnis virtus eorum (Psal. xcxII, 6). Et alio loco :
And thus the true faith truly adores the Son as one God with the Father—a faith which so knows that the one God is to be served by all creatures, that it knows the homage of divine service is not owed to any creature. CHAPTER 8. The Holy Spirit is not a creature, but Creator. The Holy Spirit is true God. We are the temple of the Holy Spirit, just as of the Father and of the Son. The Holy Spirit is equal to God the Father and the Son. — 17. Hence it is that the true faith asserts the Holy Spirit also to be Creator, not creature. For how could He be denied to be Creator, by whom the strength of the heavens is shown to be established, as David says: 'By the word of the Lord the heavens were established, and all the strength of them by the Spirit of His mouth' (Ps. 32:6). And in another place:
如此,真信仰真實地敬拜聖子為與聖父同一之神——這信仰既知道獨一的神當受眾受造之物的事奉,也知道對神事奉的順服不當歸於任何受造之物。第八章:聖靈不是受造之物,乃是造物主。聖靈是真神。我們是聖靈的殿,正如是聖父與聖子的殿。聖靈與父神、子神同等。——十七、故此,真信仰主張聖靈也是造物主,而非受造之物。因為那位藉以顯明諸天之能力得以堅立的,怎能被否認為造物主呢?正如大衛所說:「諸天藉耶和華的命而造,萬象藉祂口中的氣而成。」(詩三十三6)又在別處說:
6:291
Emittes Spiritum tuum, et creabuntur (Psal. CIII, 30). Creatorquippe est omnium rerum, qui factor est homiuum. De quo beatus Job dicit: Spiritus divinus qui fecit me (Job. XXXIII, 4). Spiritus ergo sanctus, sicut omnia creavit, sic omnia replet immensus. Et quia immensus replet d, natu­ raliter est verus Deus. Scriptum est enim : quia Spi­ ritus Domini replevit orbem terrarum Sap. I, 7). Nam et beatus David ubique esse Spiritum Dei te­ statur, dicens de eo : Quo ibo a spiritu tuo, aut a fa­ cie tua quo fugiam (Psal. CXXXVIII, 7) ? Quomodo au­ tem negant Ariani Deum esse Spiritum sanctum, cum ita simus templum Spiritus sancli, sicut sumus templum Patris et Filii ? Apostolus enim dicit:
'Thou shalt send forth thy Spirit, and they shall be created' (Ps. 103:30). For he who is the maker of men is indeed the Creator of all things. Of him blessed Job says: 'The divine Spirit that made me' (Job 33:4). The Holy Spirit, therefore, just as he created all things, so being boundless he fills all things. And because, being boundless, he fills all, he is by nature true God. For it is written: 'The Spirit of the Lord hath filled the whole world' (Wis. 1:7). And blessed David also bears witness that the Spirit of God is everywhere, saying of him: 'Whither shall I go from thy spirit, or whither shall I flee from thy face?' (Ps. 138:7). But how do the Arians deny that the Holy Spirit is God, when we are the temple of the Holy Spirit just as we are the temple of the Father and of the Son? For the Apostle says:
「你發出你的靈,牠們便受造」(詩一〇三30)。那位造人的,正是萬物的創造者。論到祂,聖約伯說:「造我的是神的靈」(伯三十三4)。所以聖靈既造了萬物,也因其無限而充滿萬物。既然祂無限而充滿萬有,就本性上是真神。因為經上記著:「主的靈充滿了世界」(智一7)。至福的大衛也見證神的靈無處不在,論到祂說:「我往哪裡去躲避你的靈?我往哪裡逃避你的面?」(詩一三八7)。可是亞流派怎能否認聖靈是神呢?既然我們是聖靈的殿,正如我們是聖父與聖子的殿。因為使徒說:
6:292
Nescitis quia templum Dei eatis, et Spiritus Dei habitat in vobis ? Si quis autem templum Dei violaverit, dis­ perdet illum Deus. Templum enim Det sanctum est, quod estis vos (I Cor. III, 16). Sic autem nos Aposto­ Ius asserit esse templum Dei, ut in eadem epistola templum nos dicat etiam Spiritus sancti. Dicit enim : Nescitis quia membra vestra templum sunt qui in vobis habitat Spiritus sancti, quem habetis a Deo (I Cor. vi, 19) ? Et ut ipsum Spirilum sanctum Deurn esse demonstraret, continuo subjuuxit : Glorificate et portate Deum in corpore vestro (Ibid., 20). 18. Æqualis est ergo Patri et Filio Spiritus sanctus, quia creator est omnium rerum, sicut Pater et Filius.
'Know you not that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? But if any man violate the temple of God, him shall God destroy. For the temple of God is holy, which you are' (1 Cor. 3:16-17). Now the Apostle asserts that we are the temple of God in such a way that in the same epistle he also calls us the temple of the Holy Spirit. For he says: 'Know you not that your members are the temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God?' (1 Cor. 6:19). And to show that this same Holy Spirit is God, he added at once: 'Glorify and bear God in your body' (ibid. 20). 18. The Holy Spirit, therefore, is equal to the Father and the Son, because he is the Creator of all things, just as the Father and the Son.
「豈不知你們是神的殿,神的靈住在你們裡頭嗎?若有人毀壞神的殿,神必要毀壞那人。因為神的殿是聖的,這殿就是你們」(林前三16-17)。使徒既如此斷言我們是神的殿,也在同一封書信中稱我們為聖靈的殿。因為他說:「豈不知你們的身子就是聖靈的殿嗎?這聖靈是從神而來,住在你們裡頭的」(林前六19)。為要顯明這同一位聖靈就是神,他隨即補充說:「所以要在你們的身子上榮耀神,並擔負神」(同20)。十八、所以聖靈與聖父、聖子平等,因為祂是萬物的創造者,正如聖父與聖子一樣。
6:293
Æqualis est Patri et Filio Spiritus sanctus, quiaI omnia replei immensus e, sicut Pater et Filius- Æqualis est Patri et Filio Spiritus sanctus , quia omnium fidelium membra unum templum habet sic­ ut Pater et Filius. Quis autem negare audeat unam esse divinitatem Patris , et Filii, et Spiritus sancti, tum corpora fidelium, quae membra sunt Christi, ipsa templum sint Spiritus sancti? CAP. IX. Conclusio de Trinitate. In tribus personis non est diversitas divinæ naturæ. Baptismus non va­ let nisi in ':omine Trinitatis collatus, — 19. Trinitas est itaque unus solus creator omnium rerum Deus, Trinitas est unus solus immensus naturaliter Deus.
The Holy Spirit is equal to the Father and the Son, because being boundless he fills all things, just as the Father and the Son. The Holy Spirit is equal to the Father and the Son, because he holds the members of all the faithful as one temple, just as the Father and the Son. Who then would dare to deny that the divinity of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is one, since the bodies of the faithful, which are the members of Christ, are themselves the temple of the Holy Spirit? CHAP. IX. Conclusion concerning the Trinity. In the three persons there is no diversity of the divine nature. Baptism has no force unless conferred in the name of the Trinity. — 19. The Trinity, therefore, is one sole God the Creator of all things; the Trinity is one sole God boundless by nature.
聖靈與聖父、聖子平等,因為祂無限而充滿萬物,正如聖父與聖子。聖靈與聖父、聖子平等,因為祂把眾信徒的肢體視為同一座殿,正如聖父與聖子。既然信徒的身體——就是基督的肢體——本身就是聖靈的殿,誰還敢否認聖父、聖子、聖靈的神性乃是同一呢?第九章 論三位一體的結論。三位之中並無神性本質的差異。洗禮惟有奉三位一體之名施行才有效。——十九、所以三位一體乃是萬物惟一的創造之神;三位一體乃是本性上無限的惟一之神。
6:294
Ad bnjus imaginem Trinitatis homo factus agnosci- lur, in cujus nomine baptizatus denuo renovatur. Baptizari autem gentes in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti (Matth. XXVIII, 19), Salvator noster edocuit, ut sicut Trinitatis opere initium conditionls accepimus, sic in nomine Trinitatis, divinæ adoptio­ nis gratiam sumeremus a. Unus est ergo verus Deus Pater, et Filius, et Spiritus sanctus, qui omnipoten- lissima bonitate creat homines , et gratuita misera­ tione justificat peccatores. Præter hunc unum b Deum rerum nullus est Deus, quia dum dicit: Videte quia ego sum Deus, et non est alius præter me (Deut.
Man is known to have been made to this image of the Trinity, and being baptized in whose name he is renewed anew. Now our Saviour taught that the nations should be baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:19), so that, just as we received the beginning of our creation by the work of the Trinity, so in the name of the Trinity we might receive the grace of divine adoption. There is, therefore, one true God, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, who by most almighty goodness creates men, and by freely-given mercy justifies sinners. Besides this one God of all things there is no God, for when he says: 'See that I am God, and there is no other besides me' (Deut.
人被認為是照著三位一體的這形像而受造的,並奉這名受洗而重新更新。我們的救主教導說,萬民要奉聖父、聖子、聖靈的名受洗(太二十八19),好叫我們既藉三位一體的工作得了受造的開端,也奉三位一體之名領受神性收養的恩典。所以只有一位真神,就是聖父、聖子、聖靈,祂以全能的良善創造世人,以白白賜予的憐憫使罪人稱義。除這位萬物的獨一真神之外,別無他神,因為當祂說:「你們要看見我是神,除我以外別無他神」(申
6:295
XXXII, I 59), docet nos et admonet grave esse peccatum , si quis extra unum Deum alium credat e. Alium sine dubio credit quisquis in Patre, et Filio, et Spiritu sancto , diversitatem divinitatis existimat; cum ille Deus, qui solus habet veram divinitatem, colendi al­ terius dei nullatenus 205 tribuat facultatem; nec in sacramento redemptionis humanæ sit aliquatenus' nominandus , quisquis ab unius veri Dei natura in­ venitur extraneus. Mysterium autem redemptionis humanæ nulla ratione perficitur, si in baptismo vel Filii, vel Spiritus sancti, vocabulum subtrahatur, CAP. x. Excusatio brevitatis. — 19 bis.
32:39), he teaches and admonishes us that it is a grave sin if anyone believes in another beside the one God. Without doubt he believes in another who supposes there is a diversity of divinity in the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit; whereas that God, who alone possesses true divinity, grants no power at all of worshipping another god; nor is anyone in any way to be named in the sacrament of human redemption who is found to be a stranger to the nature of the one true God. But the mystery of human redemption is by no means accomplished if in baptism the name of the Son or of the Holy Spirit be withdrawn. CHAP. X. An apology for brevity. — 19 bis.
三十二39),祂教導並警戒我們:若有人在獨一之神以外相信別的神,乃是大罪。凡在聖父、聖子、聖靈裡認為神性有差異的人,無疑就是相信了別的神;因為那惟獨擁有真神性的神,絕不容人有敬拜別神的餘地;凡被發現與獨一真神的本性相異的,都絕不可在人類救贖的聖禮中被提名。倘若在洗禮中把聖子或聖靈的名字除去,人類救贖的奧祕便斷然無法成就。第十章 為簡略致歉。——第十九再述。
6:296
Proinde, quoniam epistolaris modus sermonem nostre disputa­ lionis non permittit extendi, dilectionis tuæ primordia non sunt lectionis prolixitate fatiganda, sed brevitate potius excitanda , ut dum breve opus delectabiliter legis, ad prolixam lectionem ardentius inflammeris. Pauca quæ dicturus sum, intente lege, prudenter in­ tellige, et indubitanter tene : ex quibus valeas in assentone fidei a falsis vera discernere, et Christia­ nam fidem, ipsius illuminatoris nostri juvamine reti­ nere d. CAP. XI. In Trinitate unus Deus, una natura. Er­ ror Sabellianorum. — 20. Unus Dens est sancta Tri­ nitas, Pater, et Filius, et Spiritus sanctus.
Therefore, since the manner of a letter does not permit the discourse of our disputation to be extended, the first beginnings of your love are not to be wearied by lengthy reading, but rather to be roused by brevity, so that while you read a short work with delight, you may be more ardently inflamed toward more extensive reading. Read attentively the few things I am about to say, understand them prudently, and hold them without doubt: from which you may be able, in the assent of faith, to discern the true from the false, and to retain the Christian faith by the help of our very Enlightener. CHAP. XI. In the Trinity there is one God, one nature. The error of the Sabellians. — 20. The Holy Trinity is one God, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
因此,既然書信的體例不容我們把辯論的話語延長,就不當以冗長的閱讀使你初萌的愛心疲乏,反倒當以簡短來激發它,好叫你愉快地讀這短小的作品時,更熱切地被激勵去作更廣的閱讀。我將要說的這少許話,你要留心讀、審慎明白、毫不遲疑地持守:由此你便能在信德的認同中分辨真偽,並藉那光照我們者的幫助持守基督信仰。第十一章 三位一體中乃一神、一性。撒伯流派之謬誤。——二十、至聖三位一體乃一神,即聖父、聖子、聖靈。
6:297
Una est enim Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti, natura, sed non una persona. Proinde ut retenta veritate possis refellere, vel certe respuere falsitatem, si quem vi­ deris ita Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus unam con­ fiteri naturam, ut velit unam asserere personam, noli Christianum catholicum putare, sed hæreticum Sabellianum agnosce. CAP. XII. Error Arianorum. Sabelliani et Ariani in quo recipiendi, in quo respuendi. - it.. Si quem vero audieris itatres personas, Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti t dicere, ut velit tres naturas istarum trium personarum asserere, Arianum haereticum sine dubi- talione intellige.
For one is the nature of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, but not one person. Accordingly, that by holding fast the truth you may be able to refute, or at least to reject, falsehood: if you should see anyone confessing the one nature of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Spirit in such a way that he wishes to assert one person, do not think him a Catholic Christian, but recognize him as a Sabellian heretic. CHAP. XII. The error of the Arians. In what the Sabellians and Arians are to be received, and in what rejected. — 21. But if you should hear anyone speaking of three persons, of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in such a way that he wishes to assert three natures of these three persons, understand him without hesitation to be an Arian heretic.
因為聖父、聖子、聖靈的本性乃是一個,位格卻不是一個。因此,為使你藉持守真理而能駁斥、或至少拒絕謬誤:你若見有人承認聖父、聖子、聖靈的本性為一,卻要主張只有一位格,不要以為他是大公教會的基督徒,倒要認出他是撒伯流派的異端。第十二章 亞流派之謬誤。撒伯流派與亞流派各在何處當接納、何處當拒絕。——二十一、但你若聽見有人論到聖父、聖子、聖靈三位格時,竟要主張這三位格有三種本性,就當毫不遲疑地認定他是亞流派的異端。
6:298
Verum est enim quod Sabelliani unam naturam Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti, credunt ; sed falsum est quod tres personas esse non credunt. Verum est etiam quod Ariani tres personas Patris, ct Filii, et Spiritus sancti, dicunt; sed falsum est quod istarum trium personarum tres naturas per­ suadere contendunt. Perverse itaque Ariani natu­ ram Trinitatis dividunt, et personas Sabelliani con­ fundunt; cum ita sit una natura Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti, ut non sit una persona ; quia alia est persona Patris, alia Filii, alia Spiritus sancti. CAP. XIII. Error Macedonianorum. — 22.
For it is true that the Sabellians believe one nature of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit; but it is false that they do not believe there are three persons. It is also true that the Arians speak of three persons of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit; but it is false that they strive to persuade of three natures of these three persons. Thus perversely the Arians divide the nature of the Trinity, and the Sabellians confound the persons; whereas the nature of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is one in such a way that it is not one person; for the person of the Father is one, of the Son another, of the Holy Spirit another. CHAP. XIII. The error of the Macedonians. — 22.
因為撒伯流派相信聖父、聖子、聖靈是一個本性,這是真的;但他們不相信有三位格,這是錯的。亞流派說聖父、聖子、聖靈有三位格,這也是真的;但他們竭力主張這三位格有三種本性,這卻是錯的。於是亞流派乖謬地分割三位一體的本性,撒伯流派則混淆位格;然而聖父、聖子、聖靈的本性乃是一個,卻不是一個位格;因為聖父是一個位格,聖子是另一位格,聖靈又是另一位格。第十三章 馬其頓派之謬誤。——二十二、
← prev partnext part →
← ch. 5ch. 7 →
12345678910111213141516