📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Against the Donatists

Optatus of Milevis

Against the Donatists 1 part 6/10

Latin original · 37 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 1:188–1:224 (360 verses in all)

ch. 2 →
← prev partnext part →
1:188
\'adtendite post uos T nam et cum dicitis: \'redimite animas uestras\', unde illas emistis, ut uendatis? quis est ille nescio quis angelus, qui nundinas facit animarum? cum dicitis: \'redimite animas uestras,\' redemptori renuntiatis, cum solus Christus sit redemptor animarum, quas ante eius aduentum diabolus possidebat. has sanguine suo Christus saluator noster redemit apostolo dicente: empti enim estis pretio magno. constat enim sanguine Christi omnes redemptos. Christus non uendidit, quos redemit, animae emptae a Christo non potuerunt uendi, ut possint, sicut uultis, a uobis iterum redimi. aut quomodo potest una anima duos dominos habere ? aut numquid est alter redemptor?
'Look behind you'? For also when you say: 'Redeem your souls,' from where did you buy them, that you should sell them? Who is that I-know-not-what angel, who holds a market of souls? When you say: 'Redeem your souls,' you renounce the Redeemer, since Christ alone is the Redeemer of souls, which the devil possessed before His coming. These Christ our Saviour redeemed with His own blood, the Apostle saying: 'For you were bought with a great price.' For it is established that all were redeemed by the blood of Christ. Christ did not sell those whom He redeemed; the souls bought by Christ could not be sold, so that they might, as you wish, be again redeemed by you. Or how can one soul have two lords? Or is there perhaps another redeemer?
「往你後面看」?因為你們說「贖你們的靈魂」時,你們是從何處買來這些靈魂,竟要販賣它們呢?那不知是誰的天使、那設立靈魂市場的,究竟是誰?你們說「贖你們的靈魂」時,便是背棄那位救贖主,因為惟有基督是靈魂的救贖主,這些靈魂在祂降臨之前原是魔鬼所佔有的。我們的救主基督用自己的血救贖了這些靈魂,使徒說:「因為你們是用重價買來的。」因為顯然眾人都是藉基督的血被救贖的。基督並沒有出賣祂所救贖的人;被基督買來的靈魂不能被賣,以致能照你們所願再被你們贖回。不然,一個靈魂怎能有兩個主人呢?難道另有一位救贖主嗎?
1:189
qui prophetae nuntiauerunt alterum esse uenturum? quis Gabriel iterum ad alteram Mariam locutus est? quae uirgo iterum peperit? quis uirtutes nouas aut alteras fecit? si nullus est praeter unum, qui redemit animas omnium credentium, quid est, quod dicitis: \'redimite animas uestras?\' iam illud quale est, quod hominibus christianis, etiam clericis dicitis: \'estote christiani ?\' et cum miraculo quodam unicuique audetis dicere:
What prophets announced that another was to come? What Gabriel spoke again to another Mary? What virgin gave birth again? Who wrought new or other mighty works? If there is none besides the One who redeemed the souls of all believers, what is it that you say: 'Redeem your souls'? Now of what sort is that which you say to Christian men, even to clerics: 'Be Christians'? And with a certain marvel you dare to say to each one:
哪些先知預言另有一位要來?哪一位加百列又向另一個馬利亞說話?哪一位童女又生了子?誰行了新的或別樣的奇事?倘若除了那位救贖一切信徒之靈魂的獨一者以外別無他人,那麼你們所說「贖你們的靈魂」是什麼意思?再者,你們對基督徒、甚至對教士說「作基督徒吧」,這又是何等的話?而你們竟帶著某種驚奇之態,膽敢對各人說:
1:190
\'Gai Sei, Gaia Seia, adhuc paganus es aut pagana?\' eum, qui ad deum se conuersum esse professus est, paganum uocas, eum, qui uel a nobis uel a nobis non in nomine nostro nec uestro sed in nomine Christi tinctus est, paganum uocassunt enim, qui et a uobis baptizati sunt et ad nostram communionem postea transierunteum, qui deum patrem per filium eius. ante aram rogauerit, paganum uocas. quicumque enim crediderit, in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti credidit, et tu eum paganum uocas post professionem fidei. si aliquis christianus, quod absit, deliquerit, peccator dici potest, paganus iterum esse non potest. sed haec omnia uultis nullius esse momenti;
'Gaius Seius, Gaia Seia, are you still a pagan man or pagan woman?' Him who has professed himself to be converted to God, you call a pagan; him who has been baptized either by us or—if not by us—not in our name nor in yours, but in the name of Christ, you call a pagan—for there are those who have been baptized by you and afterwards passed over to our communion—him who has entreated God the Father through His Son before the altar, you call a pagan. For whoever has believed, has believed in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and you call him a pagan after the profession of faith. If any Christian, which God forbid, has gone astray, he can be called a sinner; a pagan again he cannot be. But all these things you wish to be of no account;
「該猶·塞猶斯,該婭·塞婭,你還是個外邦人或外邦婦人嗎?」那已自認歸向神的人,你卻稱他為外邦人;那無論是由我們、或——若不是由我們——並非奉我們的名也非奉你們的名、乃是奉基督的名受洗的人,你卻稱他為外邦人——因為有些人是由你們施洗,後來才轉到我們團契中的——那已在祭壇前藉著神的兒子向父神祈求的人,你卻稱他為外邦人。因為凡相信的人,乃是信入父、子、聖靈的名,而你竟在他認信之後稱他為外邦人。倘若有基督徒——但願不至如此——犯了罪,他可以被稱為罪人;卻不能再作外邦人。但這一切你們都想視為無足輕重;
1:191
ac si tibi consenserit, quem seducis, unus consensus et manus tuae porrectio et pauca uerba iam tibi christianum faciunt de christiano, et ille uobis uidetur christianus, qui quod uultis fecerit, non quem fides adduxerit. Et si seductioni uestrae paulo tardius fuerit adcommodatus adsensus, etiam illa uobis argumenta non desunt, quibus quasi facile etiam nolentibus, quod uultis, suadere possitis, dum dicitis auditum esse ex ore eorum, qui iamdudum in uestro collegio fuerant, quod, qui gustaret aut acciperet de sacrificio aduentantis unitatis, de sacro gustare uideretur. non negamus ab aliquibus esse haec dicta, quos constat postea tota securitate fecisse, unde paulo ante populos deterrebant.
as if, when the one whom you seduce has agreed with you, a single consent and the extending of your hand and a few words already make him for you a Christian out of a Christian; and that man seems a Christian to you who has done what you wish, not whom faith has brought. And if assent is granted to your seduction a little too tardily, even those arguments are not lacking to you, by which—as though easily, even to the unwilling—you might persuade what you wish, when you say that it was heard from the mouth of those who had long been in your college, that whoever should taste or receive of the sacrifice of the approaching unity would seem to taste of the profane. We do not deny that these things were said by some, who, it is established, afterwards did with full security that from which a little before they were deterring the peoples.
彷彿當你所誘惑的人同意了你,僅僅一次的同意、你手的伸出和寥寥數語,就已使他從一個基督徒變成你眼中的基督徒;在你看來,凡作了你所願之事的人便是基督徒,而非由信德所引來的人。倘若對你們誘惑的應允稍嫌遲緩,那些論據你們也不缺乏,藉著它們,你們彷彿可以輕易地、甚至對不情願的人,勸服你們所願之事,當你們說:曾聽見從那些早已在你們團體中之人口中傳出,凡嘗了或領了那將臨之合一祭物的人,就彷彿是嘗了那污穢之物。我們不否認這些話是由某些人所說的,而這些人後來顯然心安理得地行了他們不久之前藉以嚇阻百姓之事。
1:192
sed alia ratio exegit has uoces, alia inuitauit in factum. nam ut haec dicerent, qui feruntur ista dixisse, opinio falsa eorum aures et omnium populorum conpleuerat. dicebatur enim illo tempore uenturos esse Paulum et Macarium, qui interessent sacrificio, ut, cum altaria solemniter aptarentur, proferrent illi imaginem, quam primo in altare ponerent, et sic sacrificium offerretur. hoc cum acciperent aures, percussi sunt et animi et uniuscuiusque lingua in haec uerba commota est, ut omnis, qui haec audierat, diceret: \'qui inde gustat, de sacro gustat\'. et recte dictum erat, si talem famam similis ueritas sequeretur.
But one reason demanded these utterances, another invited to the deed. For in order that those who are reported to have said these things might say them, a false rumour had filled their ears and the ears of all the peoples. For it was said at that time that Paul and Macarius were to come, who would be present at the sacrifice, so that, when the altars were solemnly being prepared, they would bring forth an image, which they would first place upon the altar, and so the sacrifice would be offered. When their ears received this, both their minds were struck and the tongue of each one was moved to these words, so that everyone who had heard this would say: 'Whoever tastes from there, tastes of the profane.' And it would have been rightly said, if a like truth had followed such a report.
但有一種緣由促成了這些言論,另一種緣由引向那行為。因為要使那些據說說了這些話的人說出來,一個虛假的謠言已充滿了他們的耳朵和眾百姓的耳朵。因為那時有人說,保羅和馬卡里烏斯將要來,要親臨那祭典,以致當祭壇隆重地預備好時,他們要拿出一個像,先把它放在祭壇上,然後才獻祭。當他們的耳朵聽見這事,他們的心便受了震動,各人的舌頭便發出這些話,以致凡聽見此事的人都說:「凡從那裡嘗的,就是嘗了污穢之物。」這話本是說得不錯,倘若有相符的真實跟隨這樣的謠言。
1:193
at ubi uentum est a supradictis, nihil tale uisum est ex eo, quod fuerat paulo ante fama mentita: nihil uiderunt christiani oculi, quod horrerent, nihil probauit aspectus ex his, quibus perturbatus erat auditus. uisa est puritas et ritu solito solemnis consuetudo perspecta est, cum uiderent diuinis sacrificiis nec mutatum quicquam nec additum nec ablatum. pax a deo commendata uolentibus placuit; quare nullus eorum debet argui, qui de collegio uestro ad pacem transitum fecit. qui fuerant sinistra opinione turbati, simplici ac pura ueritate firmati sunt. nec dicatur de amaro fecisse dulce aut de dulci amarum.
But when men came to the places mentioned above, nothing of the kind was seen which rumor had shortly before falsely reported: Christian eyes saw nothing to shudder at, the sight confirmed nothing of those things by which the hearing had been disturbed. Purity was seen, and the solemn observance was beheld in its accustomed rite, when men saw that in the divine sacrifices nothing had been changed, nothing added, nothing taken away. The peace commended by God pleased those who were willing; therefore none of them ought to be reproached who passed over from your communion to peace. Those who had been troubled by an unfavorable opinion were strengthened by the simple and pure truth. Nor let it be said that they made the bitter sweet or the sweet bitter.
但當人們來到上述地方時,先前謠言虛假傳報的事,卻絲毫未見:基督徒的眼睛看不到任何可戰慄之事,目睹也未證實那些曾使聽聞驚擾的事。所見的乃是純淨,那莊嚴的慣例按其素常的禮儀被審視,人們看見在神聖的祭獻中毫無更改、毫無增添、毫無刪減。神所稱許的和平,使願意的人喜悅;所以凡從你們的團契轉投和平的人,都不當受責備。那些曾因錯誤意見而困擾的人,如今因單純而純淨的真理得了堅固。不可說他們把苦變甜,或把甜變苦。
1:194
amaritudo, quae de falsitate uidebatur fuisse nuntiata, in sinu opinionis resedit ac remansit; ueritas perspecta oculis dulcedinem suam in se habens a falsae opinionis limitibus separata est. ergo nec de amaro factum est dulce nec de dulci amarum, quia et aliud et extra est, quod est uisum, et longe fuerat, quod uidebatur auditum. quare uides te sine causa fecisse conuicium fingens pro arbitrio, quod uoluisti, ut Macarium et Taurinum lacerares. perdidisti, quod sapiens uideris, dum sensus tuos inuidia deprauauit et intellegendi tibi aditus clausit. A te nobis, frater Parmeniane, de petito milite frustra calumniam factam esse aperte dilucideque monstratum est.
The bitterness which seemed to have been announced out of falsehood settled and remained in the bosom of mere opinion; the truth, beheld by the eyes, having its own sweetness within itself, was separated from the bounds of false opinion. Therefore neither was the bitter made sweet nor the sweet made bitter, because what was seen is both another thing and outside, and far different was what seemed to have been heard. Hence you see that without cause you uttered abuse, inventing at your pleasure whatever you wished, in order to tear apart Macarius and Taurinus. You have lost the reputation of seeming wise, since envy corrupted your senses and closed to you the entrance of understanding. It has been plainly and clearly shown by you to us, brother Parmenianus, that the accusation about the soldier sought was made in vain.
那似乎出於虛謊而傳出的苦味,停留並留存於純粹意見的懷中;而真理既被眼目所見,本身內具有它自己的甘甜,便與虛假意見的界限分開了。所以苦並未變甜,甜也未變苦,因為所見的乃是另一回事,且在其外,而似乎所聽的,相差甚遠。因此你看出,你無故出言謾罵,隨己意捏造你所願意的事,為要詆毀馬迦流和陶里努。你既因嫉妒敗壞了你的悟性,閉塞了通向理解的門路,便喪失了看似有智慧的名聲。帕米尼安弟兄,你已明明白白向我們證明:關於所求之兵士的控告,乃是徒然捏造的。
1:195
etiam illud disce, quod dixisti de oleo et sacrificio peccatoris, ad uos potius pertinere. non enim ille debet esse peccator, quem uos uolueritis. nam et nos uestram praesumptionem possumus imitari et dicere uos esse peccatores. sed facessat ex utraque parte praesumptio: nullus nostrum humano iudicio alterum damnet. dei est nosse reum, illius ferre sententiam. taceamus omnes homines, solus deus indicet peccatorem, cuius sacrificium sit canina uictima et cuius oleum ungi desideranti. ingerat metum. Huius rei apertissimam ueritatem, Parmeniane frater, agnosce.
Learn this also: what you said about the oil and the sacrifice of the sinner pertains rather to you. For he ought not to be a sinner whom you may wish to be such. For we too can imitate your presumption and say that you are the sinners. But let presumption be done away on both sides: let none of us condemn another by human judgment. It is God's to know the guilty, His to pass sentence. Let all men be silent; let God alone point out the sinner, whose sacrifice is a dog for a victim and whose oil anoints him who desires it. Let it strike fear. Acknowledge, brother Parmenianus, the most manifest truth of this matter.
你也要學這事:你論到罪人的油與祭物所說的話,倒更適用於你們。因為他不該因你們願意他是罪人,便成了罪人。我們也能仿效你們的妄斷,說你們才是罪人。但兩方面都當去掉妄斷:我們中間沒有人可憑人的判斷定別人的罪。認識有罪者乃是神的事,宣告判決也是祂的事。願眾人都緘默,惟獨神指出誰是罪人,誰的祭物以狗為犧牲,誰的油塗抹那渴慕者。願這事令人生畏。帕米尼安弟兄,當承認這事最明顯的真理。
1:196
si tamen hoc nomen fraternitatis frequenter a me dictum libenter audire dignaris, fac, ut tibi sit fastidiosum, tamen nobis est necessarium, ne forte iuxta probationem huius nominis tacendo rei esse uideamur. si enim tu non uis esse frater, ego esse incipio inpius, si de nomine isto tacuero. estis enim fratres nostri et nos uestri propheta dicente: nonne uos unus deus creauit et unus pater genuit? non enim potestis non esse fratres, cum omnibus dictum sit: dii estis et filii altissimi omnes. et nos et uos unum praeceptum accepimus, in quo dictum est: ne uocetis uobis quemquam patrem in terris, quia unus est pater uester in caelis. saluator noster Christus solus natus est filius dei;
If, however, you deign to hear gladly this name of brotherhood so often spoken by me, grant that, though it be wearisome to you, it is nevertheless necessary for us, lest perhaps by keeping silent, in accordance with the proof of this name, we should seem to be guilty. For if you do not wish to be a brother, I begin to be impious if I keep silent about that name. For you are our brothers and we yours, since the prophet says: 'Has not one God created you, and one Father begotten you?' For you cannot but be brothers, since it has been said to all: 'You are gods and all sons of the Most High.' Both we and you have received one commandment, in which it is said: 'Call no man father for yourselves on earth, for one is your Father who is in heaven.' Our Savior Christ alone was born the Son of God;
然而,倘若你肯欣然聽我屢次所說「弟兄」這名稱,就請你寬容:這名稱於你縱然厭煩,於我們卻是必需的,免得我們照這名稱所要求的,因緘默而似乎有了罪。因為你若不願作弟兄,我若對這名稱緘默,便要成為不虔之人。因為你們是我們的弟兄,我們也是你們的弟兄,正如先知所說:「豈不是一位神創造了你們,一位父生了你們嗎?」你們不能不作弟兄,因為對眾人都說了:「你們是神,都是至高者的兒子。」我們和你們都領受了一條誡命,其中說:「不要稱地上的人為父,因為只有一位是你們在天上的父。」惟有我們的救主基督生為神的兒子;
1:197
sed et nos et uos filii dei uno modo facti sumus, sicut in euangelio scriptum est: uenit filius dei: quotquot eum receperunt, dedit eis potestatem, ut filii dei fierent, qui credunt in nomine eius. nos et facti sumus et dicimur, uos et facti estis et non dicimini, quia pacifici esse non uultis nec audire ipsum filium dei dicentem: felices pacifici, quia ipsi filii dei uocabuntur. Christus ueniens deum et hominem reuocauit in pacem: et fecit ambos unum tollens medium saepem parietis. uos nobiscum, id est cum fratribus pacem habere non uultis. non enim potestis non esse fratres, quos isdem sacramentorum uisceribus una mater ecclesia genuit, quos eodem modo adoptiuos filios deus pater excepit.
but both we and you have been made sons of God in one and the same way, as it is written in the Gospel: 'The Son of God came: as many as received Him, He gave them power to become sons of God, even to those who believe in His name.' We both have been made so and are called so; you have been made so and are not called so, because you are unwilling to be peacemakers, nor to hear the Son of God Himself saying: 'Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.' Christ, in His coming, recalled God and man into peace; and He made both one, removing the dividing wall of partition. You are unwilling to have peace with us, that is, with your brothers. For you cannot but be brothers whom one mother, the Church, has begotten in the same vital fluids of the sacraments, whom God the Father has received in the same manner as adopted sons.
但我們和你們都是照著同一方式被造成為神的兒子,正如福音書所記:「神的兒子來了,凡接待祂的,就是信祂名的人,祂就賜他們權柄,作神的兒女。」我們既被造成,也被稱為神的兒女;你們雖被造成,卻不被如此稱呼,因為你們不願作和睦的人,也不願聽神的兒子親自說:「使人和睦的人有福了,因為他們必稱為神的兒子。」基督降臨,召喚神與人歸於和平;祂使兩下合而為一,拆毀了中間隔斷的牆。你們不願與我們,就是與你們的弟兄和睦。因為你們不能不作弟兄,你們既是同一位母親教會,在同一聖禮的胎腹中所生,又是父神照同一方式所收納的義子。
1:198
unde huius temporis praescius Christus, quia futurum erat, ut a nobis hodie discordaretis, talia dedit orandi mandata, ut uel in oratione unitas remansisset, ut iungerent preces, quos discrepaturae fuerant partes. oramus pro uobis, quia uolumus, et uos pro nobis, et cum non uultis. aut dicat unusquisque uestrum: \'pater meus, qui in caelis as\', et \'panem meum cotidianum da mihi hodie\', et \'dimitte mihi peccata, quomodo et ego debitori meo\'. igitur si quae mandata sunt, mutari non possunt, uidetis nos non in totum ab inuicem esse separatos, dum et nos pro uobis oramus •- uolentes et uos pro nobis oratis etsi nolentes.
Whence Christ, foreknowing this present time, since it was to come about that you would today be at discord with us, gave such commands concerning prayer, that at least in prayer unity might remain, that those whom factions were going to set at variance might join their prayers. We pray for you, because we wish to, and you pray for us, even though you do not wish to. Or let each one of you say: 'My Father, who art in heaven,' and 'Give me this day my daily bread,' and 'Forgive me my sins, as I also forgive my debtor.' Therefore, if those things which have been commanded cannot be changed, you see that we are not wholly separated from one another, since we both pray for you willingly, and you pray for us, although unwillingly.
因此基督預知這當前的時候,知道有一天你們要與我們不和,便賜下這樣關於禱告的命令,使至少在禱告中合一仍能存留,使那將被黨派分裂的人,在禱告中聯合起來。我們因為願意,便為你們禱告;你們雖不願意,也為我們禱告。或者你們各人都要說:「我們在天上的父」、「我們日用的飲食,今日賜給我們」、「免我們的罪,如同我也免了我的負債者」。所以,這些既是命令,便不能更改,可見我們彼此並未全然分開,因為我們甘心為你們禱告,你們雖不甘願,也為我們禱告。
1:199
uides, frater Parmeniane, sanctae germanitatis uincula inter nos et uos in totum rumpi non posse. Iam peccator quaerendus est, cuius potuit uel oleum timeri uel sacrificium repudiari. cesset humana suspicio., utriusque partis praesumptio sileat; quis sit peccator, solus indicet deus. legimus in XLVIIII psalmo sub secundo diapsalmate spiritum sanctum dixisse: peccatori autem dixit deus. hoc loco aduertenda est tota mentis intentio et uidendum, quis sit peccator. si enim post quod lectum est: peccatori autem dixit deus, uerba huiusmodi sequerentur, ut diceret: \'tulisti arma, proiecisti te castris, stetisti contra hostes in acie\', timendum erat militi, quia potuit ipse uideri peccator.
You see, brother Parmenianus, that the bonds of holy kinship between us and you cannot be wholly broken. Now the sinner must be sought, whose oil could be feared or whose sacrifice rejected. Let human suspicion cease, let the presumption of both sides be silent; who is the sinner, let God alone declare. We read in the forty-ninth Psalm, under the second 'diapsalma,' that the Holy Spirit said: 'But to the sinner God said.' In this place the whole attention of the mind must be applied, and it must be seen who the sinner is. For if, after what was read: 'But to the sinner God said,' there followed words of this kind, that He should say: 'You took up arms, you threw yourself into the camp, you stood against the enemy in battle line,' then the soldier had cause to fear, because he himself could seem to be the sinner.
帕米尼安弟兄,你看出我們與你們之間神聖親屬的繫帶,不能完全斷絕。如今必須尋出那罪人,就是其油可懼、其祭物可棄的人。願人的猜疑止息,願兩方面的妄斷緘默;誰是罪人,惟獨神當宣告。我們在第四十九篇詩篇中,在第二個「停頓」之下讀到聖靈說:「但神對罪人說。」在這裡當以全心專注,看明誰是罪人。因為在所讀的「但神對罪人說」之後,倘若接著這樣的話,說:「你拿起兵器,投身營中,列陣抵擋仇敵」,那麼兵士便有可懼之處,因為他自己可被看作罪人。
1:200
aut si diceret: \'conparasti merces, peregrinatus es, egisti nundinas, lucri causa quod emeras, uendidisti\', timendum erat negotiatori, quia potuit ipse uideri peccator. aut si diceret: \'fabricasti nauem, struxisti funibus, ornasti uelis, opportunos, ut nauigares, captasti uentos\', timendum erat nautae, quia potuit ipse uideri peccator. aut post quod lectum est: peccatori autem dixit deus, si sequerentur haec uerba:
Or if He should say: 'You bought wares, you traveled abroad, you conducted markets, you sold for gain what you had bought,' then the merchant had cause to fear, because he himself could seem to be the sinner. Or if He should say: 'You built a ship, you fitted it with ropes, you decked it with sails, you watched for favorable winds in order to sail,' then the sailor had cause to fear, because he himself could seem to be the sinner. Or, after what was read: 'But to the sinner God said,' if these words should follow:
或者祂若說:「你購買貨物,往遠方經商,做買賣,把買來的為謀利而賣出」,那麼商人便有可懼之處,因為他自己可被看作罪人。或者祂若說:「你造了船,用繩索裝配,用帆裝飾,為要航行而守候順風」,那麼水手便有可懼之處,因為他自己可被看作罪人。或者,在所讀的「但神對罪人說」之後,倘若接著這些話:
1:201
\'dissensio et scisma tibi displicuit, concordasti cum fratre tuo et cum una ecclesia, quae est in toto orbe terrarum, communicasti septem ecclesiis et memoriis apostolorum, amplexus es unitatem\', si haec subsequens lectio con-tineret, nobis timendum erat, nos esse potuimus peccatores. cum autem dicit deus: ad quid exponis iustitias meas et adsumis testamentum meum per os tuum? tu autem contempsisti disciplinam et abiecisti sermones. meos retro; sedens aduersus fratrem tuum denotabas et aduersus filium matris tuae ponebas scandalum. uidebas furem et currebas cum eo et cum adulteris portionem tuam ponebas. haec ad uos dicta sunt omnia. excusate uos ab his omnibus, si potestis.
'Dissension and schism displeased you, you came to concord with your brother and with the one Church which is in the whole world, you communicated with the seven churches and the memorials of the apostles, you embraced unity'—if the following passage contained these words, then we had cause to fear, we could be the sinners. But when God says: 'Why do you set forth my ordinances and take up my testament through your mouth? But you have despised discipline and cast my words behind you; sitting, you spoke against your brother and laid a stumbling-block against your mother's son; you saw a thief and ran with him, and with adulterers you placed your portion'—all these things are said against you. Excuse yourselves from all these, if you can.
「分裂與裂教使你不悅,你與你的弟兄並與遍及全世界的獨一教會歸於和睦,你與七教會並使徒的紀念相通,你擁抱了合一」——倘若接下來的經文含有這些話,那麼我們便有可懼之處,我們可以是罪人。但當神說:「你為何傳述我的律例,口中提及我的約?你卻棄絕了管教,把我的話丟在背後;你坐著毀謗你的弟兄,向你母親的兒子設下絆腳石;你見了賊就與他同夥,又與行淫的人同分」——這一切都是對你們說的。你們若能,就為這一切替自己辯解吧。
1:202
A uobis enim contempta est disciplina; ut quid recitas testamentum, qui testamento non seruis, in quo descripta est disciplina, quam seruare non uultis? non enim potestis dicere uos eam seruare, contra quam militatis. deus dicit: quaere pacem et consequeris eam; tu repudiasti pacem: non est contemnere disciplinam? in euangelio legitur: pax hominibus in terra bonae uoluntatis; tu nec uoluntatem bonam uis habere nec pacem: non est contemnere disciplinam? item in psalmo CXXXII legitur: ecce quam bonum est et iucundum habitare fratres in unum; in unum habitare cum fratribus non uis: non est contemnere disciplinam? Christus dicit in euangelio:
For by you discipline has been despised; why do you recite the testament, you who do not keep the testament in which is written the discipline which you are unwilling to keep? For you cannot say that you keep that against which you wage war. God says: 'Seek peace and you shall attain it'; you have rejected peace: is this not to despise discipline? In the Gospel it is read: 'Peace on earth to men of good will'; you wish to have neither good will nor peace: is this not to despise discipline? Likewise in Psalm 132 it is read: 'Behold how good and pleasant it is for brothers to dwell together in unity'; you do not wish to dwell in unity with your brothers: is this not to despise discipline? Christ says in the Gospel:
因為管教已被你們所藐視;你們既不遵守那記載著管教的約,為何還誦讀這約呢?你們所不願遵守的,你們也不能說你們遵守了。神說:「你要尋求和平,就必得著」;你卻棄絕了和平:這豈不是藐視管教麼?福音書中讀到:「在地上平安歸與祂所喜悅的人」;你卻既不願有美意,也不願有和平:這豈不是藐視管教麼?照樣,詩篇一百三十二篇讀到:「看哪,弟兄和睦同居,是何等的善,何等的美」;你卻不願與你的弟兄和睦同居:這豈不是藐視管教麼?基督在福音書中說:
1:203
qui semel lotus est, non habet necessitatem iterum lauandi; tu rebaptizando iterum lauas: non est contemnere disciplinam? deus dicit: ne tetigeritis christos meos neque in prophetas meos manum miseritis; uos tot sacerdotes dei honoribus expoliastis: non est contemnere disciplinam? Christus dicit: inde scio, quia discipuli mei estis, si uos inuicem diligatis; odio nos habetis, fratres utique uestros, nec apostolos imitari uoluistis, a quibus etiam negator dilectus est Petrus: non est contemnere disciplinam? exponis iustificationes dei et adsumis testamentum eius per os tuum. quomodo disputas: quaere pacem, cum non habeas pacem?
'He who has once been washed has no need to wash again'; you, by rebaptizing, wash again: is this not to despise discipline? God says: 'Touch not my anointed ones, neither lay hands upon my prophets'; you have stripped so many priests of God of their honors: is this not to despise discipline? Christ says: 'By this I know that you are my disciples, if you love one another'; you hate us, your brothers indeed, nor have you wished to imitate the apostles, among whom even Peter the denier was loved: is this not to despise discipline? You set forth God's justifications and take up His testament through your mouth. How do you argue: 'Seek peace,' when you do not have peace?
「凡已經洗過的,就不必再洗」;你卻藉著重洗再洗:這豈不是藐視管教麼?神說:「不可觸碰我受膏者,也不可向我的先知下手」;你卻剝奪了神許多祭司的尊榮:這豈不是藐視管教麼?基督說:「你們若彼此相愛,眾人因此就認出你們是我的門徒」;你卻恨惡我們——確是你們的弟兄,也不願效法使徒,連那不認主的彼得在他們中間尚且蒙愛:這豈不是藐視管教麼?你傳述神的稱義,口中提及祂的約。你既沒有和平,怎能論說「尋求和平」呢?
1:204
quomodo testamentum recitas et testamentum non seruas, in quo descripta est disciplina? Electi estis, qui sedentes populum doceatis, et detrahitis nobis utique fratribus uestris. quoniam, sicut supra dixi, una nos mater ecclesia genuit, unus nos deus pater excepit, et tamen scandala contra nos ponitis mandando singulis, ne nos salutent, ne a nobis dignationem accipiant. considerate uerba superbiae uestrae, considerate tractatus, considerate mandata, actus quoque uestros reuoluite et inuenietis oleum uestrum timuisse, qui rogabat. nullus uestrum est, qui non conuicia nostra suis tractatibus misceat, qui non aut aliud initiet aut aliud explicet. lectiones dominicas incipitis.
How do you recite the testament and not keep the testament in which the discipline is written? You are the chosen ones who, sitting, teach the people, and you disparage us, your brothers indeed. Since, as I said above, one mother, the Church, has begotten us, one God the Father has received us, and yet you place stumbling-blocks against us by commanding individuals not to greet us, not to accept any honor from us. Consider the words of your pride, consider your treatises, consider your commands, review also your acts, and you will find that he who made the request feared your oil. There is none of you who does not mingle abuse of us into his treatises, who does not either begin one thing or expound another. You begin the Lord's lessons,
你怎能誦讀這約,卻不遵守那記載著管教的約呢?你們是坐著教導百姓的選民,卻毀謗我們——確是你們的弟兄。既然如我上面所說,獨一的母親教會生了我們,獨一的父神收納了我們,你們卻向我們設下絆腳石,吩咐各人不要問我們的安,不要接受我們任何敬意。你們當思想你們驕傲的言語,思想你們的講論,思想你們的命令,也回顧你們的行為,就必發現那發出請求的人懼怕你們的油。你們中間沒有一人不把對我們的謾罵摻入他的講論中,沒有一人不是起頭講一事而闡述另一事。你們開始誦讀主的經課,
1:205
et tractatus uestros ad nostras iniurias explicatis; profertis euangelium et facitis absenti fratri conuicium; auditorum animis infunditis odia, inimicitias docendo suadetis, haec omnia dicendo contra nos scandala ponitis. ergo unicuique. uestrum dictum est: sedens aduersus fratrem tuum denotabas et aduersus filium matris tuae ponebas scandalum. dum peccatorem arguit et sedentem increpat deus, specialiter ad uos dictum esse constat, non ad populum, qui in ecclesia non habent sedendi licentiam. uides ergo procul dubio uobis inputari debere, cum dicit deus: sedens aduersus filium matris tuae ponebas scandala.
and unfold your treatises to our injury; you bring forth the Gospel and utter abuse against an absent brother; you pour hatreds into the minds of your hearers, you persuade them to enmities by teaching, and by saying all these things against us you place stumbling-blocks. Therefore it has been said to each one of you: 'Sitting, you spoke against your brother and laid a stumbling-block against your mother's son.' Since God rebukes the sinner and chides one who sits, it is established that this was said specifically to you, not to the people, who in the church have no license to sit. You see therefore beyond doubt that it must be imputed to you, when God says: 'Sitting, you laid stumbling-blocks against your mother's son.'
並闡述你們的講論來傷害我們;你們拿出福音書,卻謾罵不在場的弟兄;你們把仇恨灌入聽眾的心中,藉教導勸人結怨,又藉著向我們說這一切,設下絆腳石。所以對你們各人都說了:「你坐著毀謗你的弟兄,向你母親的兒子設下絆腳石。」既然神責備罪人,斥責那坐著的人,可見這是特特向你們說的,不是向百姓說的,因為百姓在教會中無權坐著。所以你毫無疑問地看出,當神說「你坐著向你母親的兒子設下絆腳石」時,這必歸咎於你們。
1:206
unam matrem nos habere iam totiens conprobaui nec uos negare potestis qui contra nos scandala ponitis, dum aliqui uestrum et non intellectas proferunt -lectiones, ut auferant etiam illud, quod inter omnes solet esse commune, salutationis uidelicet officium. nam et uos ipsi aliqui in perfunctoria salutatione oscula denegatis solita et docentur multi, ne aue dicant cuiquam nostrum, et uidentur sibi hoc de lectione, sed non intellecta mandari ignorantes, de quibus apostolus hoc diierit: cum his nec cibum capere; aue illi ne dixeritis; serpit enim eorum sermo uelut cancer.
I have already so often proved that we have one mother, nor can you deny it, you who place stumbling-blocks against us, since some of you bring forth lessons not understood, in order to take away even that which is wont to be common among all, namely the duty of greeting. For you yourselves, some of you, in a perfunctory greeting deny the customary kiss, and many are taught not to say 'hail' to any of us, and they think this is from a lesson, but, not understanding, they are commanded in ignorance concerning those of whom the Apostle said this: 'With such do not even take food'; 'Do not say hail to that man'; 'For their speech creeps like a cancer.'
我已屢次證明我們有一位母親,你們既向我們設下絆腳石,便不能否認,因為你們中間有人引出未經理解的經課,為要連那向來在眾人中通行的,就是問安之禮,也廢去。因為你們自己有人在敷衍的問安中拒絕慣常的親嘴,許多人受教不向我們任何人說「平安」,他們以為這是出於經課,卻不明白,乃是無知地受命,論到那些使徒所說的人:「與這樣的人連飯也不可一同吃」;「不要向那人說平安」;「因為他們的話如同毒瘡蔓延。」
1:207
dixit hoc de haereticis, quorum coeperat illis temporibus uitiosa esse doctrina, qui subtili seductione uerborum morbis obscure serpentibus corrumperent fidei sanitatem: ut Marcion, qui ex episcopo apostata factus inducebat duos deos et duos Christos, ut Praxeas, qui argumentabatur patrem passum esse, non filium, ut Ualentinus, qui conabatur carnem Christo subducere. • horum est sermo, qui habuit cancer ad fidei membra uexanda. talis sermo est et Scorpiani haeretici, qui negabat debere esse martyria. sed uenena sua sibi seruent nec eorum relatio auditorum intellectus simplices uel leuiter uexet. huius igitur sermo est, qui uitandus est, ne serpat sicut cancer.
He said this concerning heretics, whose doctrine had begun in those times to be corrupt, who by the subtle seduction of words, with diseases obscurely creeping, would corrupt the soundness of the faith: as Marcion, who, having become an apostate from a bishop, introduced two gods and two Christs; as Praxeas, who argued that the Father suffered, not the Son; as Valentinus, who tried to take away the flesh from Christ. Theirs is the speech which had a cancer to vex the members of the faith. Such also is the speech of the heretic Scorpianus, who denied that there ought to be martyrdoms. But let them keep their poisons to themselves, nor let the recounting of them, even slightly, vex the simple understanding of the hearers. His, therefore, is the speech which must be avoided, lest it creep like a cancer.
他說這話是論到異端者,他們的教訓在那時候已開始敗壞,他們藉著言詞微妙的引誘,以隱暗蔓延的疾病敗壞信德的健全:如馬吉安,他從主教變為叛教者,引進兩位神和兩位基督;如普拉克西亞,他辯稱受苦的是父,不是子;如華倫提努,他企圖從基督身上奪去肉身。這毒瘡的言語正是他們的,要折磨信德的肢體。那異端者斯哥皮亞努的言語也是如此,他否認應當有殉道。但願他們把毒留給自己,也不要讓人轉述他們的話,連稍微也不可攪擾聽眾單純的悟性。所以這就是當避免的言語,免得它如毒瘡蔓延。
1:208
dictum est hoc et de Ario, qui conabatur docere filium dei ex nullis substantiis factum esse, non ex deo natum; cuius doctrina, nisi in Nicaeno concilio a trecentis decem et octo episcopis dissiparetur, pectora multorum sicuti cancer intrauerat. dictum est hoc de Photino praesentis temporis haeretico, qui filium . dei ausus est dicere tantummodo hominem fuisse, non deum. potuit hoc et de nobis dici, quia uester sermo animis et auribus aliquorum non leue intulit cancer. uester enim sermo est, quem ad pacis filios habetis, dum dicitis: \'peristis, adtendite post uos; peribit anima uestra; quamdiu uos tenetis?\' sic fecistis de fidelibus paenitentes, sic mortificastis in sacerdotibus honores.
This was said also concerning Arius, who tried to teach that the Son of God was made out of no substances, not born of God; whose doctrine, had it not been dispersed in the Council of Nicaea by three hundred and eighteen bishops, would have entered the hearts of many like a cancer. This was said concerning Photinus, a heretic of the present time, who dared to say that the Son of God was only a man, not God. This could be said also of us, because your speech has inflicted no slight cancer upon the minds and ears of some. For yours is the speech which you hold toward the sons of peace, when you say: 'You have perished, look behind you; your soul will perish; how long will you hold out?' Thus you made penitents of the faithful, thus you put to death honors in the priests.
這話也是論到亞流,他企圖教導說神的兒子是從無有的本質造的,不是從神而生;他的教訓若不是在尼西亞大會上被三百一十八位主教所驅散,就要如毒瘡侵入許多人的心。這話也是論到當代的異端者佛提努,他竟敢說神的兒子只是人,不是神。這話也可論到我們,因為你們的言語已給某些人的心思和耳朵帶來不小的毒瘡。因為你們向那和平之子所持的,正是這樣的言語,你們說:「你們滅亡了,要回顧你們的後路;你們的魂要滅亡;你們還要堅持到幾時?」你們就這樣使信徒成了懺悔者,就這樣治死了祭司中的尊榮。
1:209
ecce et uester sermo est, qui serpit uelut cancer hodie, ut salutatio et conuictus prohibeatur. noster sermo quid tale facere potuit, qui simplici doctrina filios pacis retinemus, non alienos seducimus nec quemquam exterminamus? manifestum est igitur uos contra nos cotidie scandala ponere et longum est percurrere omnes modos, quibus nobis detrahitis, et omnia genera, quibus scandala ponitis. Nam et cum dicit: uidebas furem et concurrebas cum eo, de qua re hoc putatis dictum esse? numquid de subducto uestimento aut de inuolato gremio aut de aliquibus rebus, quae ablatae uel lucra uel damna inter homines faciunt? equidem sunt et ista prohibita;
Behold, yours also is the speech which creeps today like a cancer, that greeting and fellowship may be forbidden. What of this kind could our speech do, who by simple doctrine retain the sons of peace, do not seduce strangers nor drive anyone into exile? It is therefore manifest that you daily place stumbling-blocks against us, and it would be long to run through all the ways in which you disparage us, and all the kinds in which you set stumbling-blocks. For also, when He says: 'You saw a thief and ran together with him,' of what matter do you think this was said? Surely not of a garment stolen, or of a bosom plundered, or of any goods which, being carried off, make gains or losses among men? Indeed, even these things are forbidden;
看哪,那今日如毒瘡蔓延、要禁止問安與相交的,也是你們的言語。我們的言語能行甚麼這樣的事呢?我們以單純的教訓挽留和平之子,並不引誘外人,也不把任何人趕逐?所以顯然你們天天向我們設下絆腳石,要列舉你們毀謗我們的一切方式,並你們設絆腳石的一切種類,篇幅就太長了。因為當祂說:「你見了賊就與他同夥」,你們以為這是論甚麼事說的呢?難道是論偷竊的衣服,或被劫的胸懷,或人間因被奪去而造成得失的甚麼財物麼?這些事固然也是禁止的;
1:210
sed in hac lectione illa furta increpat deus, quae sibi sunt facta. quaeritis, quae furta sunt deo facta? apud uos inueniuntur. possessio dei est turba fidelium, ex qua cotidie fur diabolus cupit aliquid inuolare, qui christiani aut christianae uult uel mores ex aliqua parte corrumpere et si non totum hominem sed quodcumque de homine rapere. talem furem cum uideatis contra nos uim facere, uestris operibus adiuuistis; nam neminem fugit, quod omnis homo qui nascitur, quamuis de parentibus christianis nascatur, sine spiritu inmundo esse non possit, quem necesse sit ante salutare lauacrum ab homine excludi et separari.
but in this passage God rebukes those thefts which are committed against Himself. You ask, what thefts are committed against God? Among you they are found. God's possession is the multitude of the faithful, from which the thief, the devil, daily desires to steal something, who wishes either to corrupt in some part the morals of a Christian man or woman, and, if not the whole person, yet to snatch away whatever he can of the person. When you see such a thief doing violence against us, you have aided him by your works; for it escapes no one that every man who is born, although born of Christian parents, cannot be without an unclean spirit, which must necessarily be excluded and separated from the person before the saving washing.
但在這段經文中,神所責備的乃是那些向祂自己所行的偷竊。你問,有甚麼偷竊是向神所行的?在你們中間就找得著。神的產業乃是信徒的群眾,那賊魔鬼天天渴望從中偷去些甚麼,牠要麼想在某方面敗壞基督徒男女的品行,縱不能奪去整個人,也要從人身上劫去他所能劫的。當你們看見這樣的賊向我們施暴,你們卻以自己的作為幫助了牠;因為無人不知,凡生下來的人,雖是基督徒父母所生,也不能沒有污靈,這污靈必須在救恩的洗滌之先,從人身上被趕出、被分開。
1:211
hoc exorcismus operatur, per quem spiritus inmundus depellitur et in loca deserta fugatur. fit domus uacua in pectore credentis, fit domus munda; intrat deus et habitat apostolo dicente: uos estis templum dei et in » uobis deus habitat. et cum deo unusquisque plenus sit, de quo fur diabolus aliquid inuolare contendit, uos rebaptizando exorcizatis hominem fidelem et dicitis deo habitanti: \'maledicte, exi foras\', ut conpleatur, quod a deo dictum est per Ezechielem prophetam: et maledicebant mihi in populo meo propter plenam manum hordei et buccellam, ut occiderent animas, quas non oportuit mori, dum adnuntiant populo meo uanas seductiones.
This is what the exorcism effects, by which the unclean spirit is driven out and put to flight into desert places. The house becomes empty in the breast of the believer, the house becomes clean; God enters and dwells, as the Apostle says: 'You are the temple of God, and God dwells in you.' And since each one is full of God, from whom the thief, the devil, strives to steal something, you, by rebaptizing, exorcise the faithful man and say to God who dwells there: 'Accursed one, go out,' so that what was said by God through Ezekiel the prophet is fulfilled: 'And they reviled me among my people for a handful of barley and a morsel of bread, to slay souls which ought not to die, while they announce to my people vain seductions.'
這正是驅魔禮所成就的,藉此污靈被趕出,被逐到曠野之地。信者胸中的房屋成為空的,房屋成為潔淨的;神就進來居住,正如使徒所說:「你們是神的殿,神住在你們裡面。」既然各人都被神充滿,那賊魔鬼便竭力要從他身上偷去些甚麼,你們卻藉著重洗,向那忠信的人施行驅魔,對住在其中的神說:「受咒詛的,出去」,以致應驗了神藉先知以西結所說的話:「他們在我民中為兩把大麥、為幾塊餅褻瀆我,殺死那不該死的人,向我的民傳講虛假的誘惑。」
1:212
audit ergo deus iniurias non sibi debitas et huiusmodi habitaculum deserit; et homo, qui deo plenus in ecclesiam intrauerat, egreditur uas inane. diabolus, qui uolebat quasi fur aliquid inuolare, adiutus operibus uestris uidet totum suum factum esse, unde uolebat paululum aliquid tollere. ergo de uobis dixit deus: uidebas furem et concurrebas cum eo. denique in euangelio sic scriptum est: cum autem deus deseruerit hominem, remanet uas inane, spiritus autem inmundus errans per loca deserta ieiunus dicit: domus mea uacua esthoc est dicere: qui me excluserat, exclusus est - reuertar illuc et habitabo;
God therefore hears injuries not owed to Him, and abandons such a dwelling; and the man who had entered the church full of God, goes out an empty vessel. The devil, who, like a thief, wished to steal something, aided by your works, sees the whole made his own, from which he wished to take only a little. Therefore God said of you: 'You saw a thief and ran together with him.' Finally, in the Gospel it is thus written: 'But when God has abandoned a man, an empty vessel remains, and the unclean spirit, wandering through desert places, hungry, says: My house is empty'—that is to say: he who had shut me out has himself been shut out—'I will return there and dwell;
所以神聽見那不該歸祂的褻瀆,就離棄這樣的居所;那曾滿有神而進入教會的人,便成為空器皿出去。那如賊般想偷去些甚麼的魔鬼,因你們的作為得了助力,便看見牠原只想取一點的,竟全歸了牠。所以神論到你們說:「你見了賊就與他同夥。」末了,福音書中這樣記著:「神離棄人之後,剩下一個空器皿,污靈在曠野之地遊行,飢餓著說:我的房屋是空的」——這就是說:那曾把我趕出的,自己反被趕出了——「我要回到那裡居住;
1:213
et adducit secum alios septem saeuiores et habitabit illic et erunt hominis illius peiora nouissima, quam quod fuerunt prima. hoc est: uidebas furem et concurrebas cum eo et cum moechis particulam tuam ponebas. haereticos dicit moechos et moechas ecclesias illorum, quas aspernatur et repudiat Christus in canticis canticorum, quasi dicat: quid mihi conligitis non necessarias? una est dilecta mea, una est sponsa mea, una est columba mea, id est catholica, in qua et uos cum esse possetis, rebaptizando inter moechos particulam habere uoluistis. et quoniam uos esse peccatores diuino testimonio manifestissime conprobatum est, etiam illud ostensum est tua auxilia contra te militasse;
and he brings with himself seven others more savage, and he will dwell there, and the last state of that man will be worse than the first.' This is: 'You saw a thief and ran together with him, and with adulterers you placed your portion.' He calls heretics adulterers, and their churches adulteresses, which Christ spurns and rejects in the Song of Songs, as if He should say: 'Why do you gather for me what are not necessary? One is my beloved, one is my bride, one is my dove'—that is, the Catholic Church—'in which, since you could be, you have, by rebaptizing, wished to have your portion among adulterers.' And since it has been most manifestly proved by divine testimony that you are sinners, this also has been shown, that your own aids have warred against you;
「牠又帶了另外七個更兇惡的同來,住在那裡,那人末後的景況就比先前更壞了。」這就是:「你見了賊就與他同夥,又與行淫的人同分。」祂稱異端者為行淫的人,稱他們的教會為淫婦,就是基督在雅歌中所唾棄、所拒絕的,彷彿祂說:「你為何給我聚集那不必要的?我所愛的只有一位,我的新婦只有一位,我的鴿子只有一位」——這就是大公教會——「你既能在其中,卻藉著重洗,願在行淫者中分得一分。」既然藉著神的見證最明顯地證明了你們是罪人,這也顯明了:你們自己的助力反倒攻擊了你們;
1:214
in auxilium enim addideras prophetam, in quo lectum est: sacrificium peccatoris, quasi . qui uictimet canem. iam peccatores uos esse, si pudor est ullus, cum dolore cognosce. Etiam illud disce, cuius uox sit: oleum peccatoris non ungat caput meum. tu enim non intellexisti, cuius haec uox sit, utique Christi, qui necdum unctus fuerat, cum rogaret, ut oleum peccatoris non inquinaret caput eius. haec tu non intellegens dixisti: quia Dauid propheta timuit oleum peccatoris. a Samuele iamdudum perunctus fuerat, qui can-. tabat; non fuit ratio, ut iterum ungeretur, ergo uox est Christi dicentis: oleum peccatoris non ungat caput meum. preces sunt, non iussiones, desideria sunt, non praecepta.
for as an aid you had added the prophet, in whom it is read: 'The sacrifice of the sinner is as one who sacrifices a dog.' Now, if there is any shame, learn with sorrow that you are the sinners. Learn this also, whose voice it is: 'Let not the oil of the sinner anoint my head.' For you did not understand whose voice this is—surely Christ's, who had not yet been anointed when He prayed that the oil of the sinner might not defile His head. Not understanding this, you said: 'For David the prophet feared the oil of the sinner.' He had already long before been anointed by Samuel, he who sang; there was no reason that he should be anointed again. Therefore it is the voice of Christ saying: 'Let not the oil of the sinner anoint my head.' They are prayers, not commands; they are desires, not precepts.
因為你曾把先知加為助力,在他書中讀到:「罪人的祭物,如同獻狗者。」如今你們若還有羞恥,就當帶著憂傷認識你們乃是罪人。你也要學這事,知道這是誰的聲音:「不要讓罪人的油塗抹我的頭。」因為你不明白這是誰的聲音——確是基督的,祂尚未受膏,便祈求罪人的油不要玷污祂的頭。你不明白這事,便說:「先知大衛懼怕罪人的油。」那歌唱的大衛早已被撒母耳膏立,沒有理由再受膏。所以這是基督的聲音,說:「不要讓罪人的油塗抹我的頭。」這乃是祈求,不是命令;是渴望,不是吩咐。
1:215
nam si iussio esset, diceret: oleum peccatoris non unget caput meum. uox igitur est filii dei iam tunc metuentis oleum peccatoris incurrere, id est cuiusque hominis, quia nemo est sine peccato nisi solus deus. ideo filius eius timuit oleum hominis, quia foedum fuerat, ut deus ab homine ungeretur. ideo deprecatur patrem, ut non ungatur ab homine,. sed ab ipso deo patre. petit ergo filius; uideamus, an consenserit pater. hoc spiritus sanctus indicat et manifestat in psalmo XLIIII, ubi ait ad ipsum filium: unget te dominus deus tuus oleo exultationis aliter a consortibus tuis. consortes fuerant Iudaeorum sacerdotes et reges, quos singulos unctos ab hominibus constat.
For if it were a command, He would say: 'The oil of the sinner shall not anoint my head.' It is therefore the voice of the Son of God, even then fearing to incur the oil of the sinner, that is, of any man whatsoever, because there is no one without sin except God alone. Therefore His Son feared the oil of man, because it would be foul that God should be anointed by man. Therefore He beseeches the Father that He be anointed not by man, but by God the Father Himself. The Son therefore asks; let us see whether the Father consented. This the Holy Spirit indicates and makes manifest in Psalm 44, where He says to the Son Himself: 'The Lord your God shall anoint you with the oil of gladness above your fellows.' His fellows had been the priests and kings of the Jews, who, each one, are established as having been anointed by men.
因為這若是命令,祂就會說:「罪人的油必不塗抹我的頭。」所以這是神兒子的聲音,祂那時就懼怕沾染罪人的油,就是任何人的油,因為除了神以外,沒有一個是無罪的。所以神的兒子懼怕人的油,因為神被人所膏乃是污穢的事。所以祂懇求父,使祂不被人所膏,乃被父神自己所膏。子既如此祈求,我們且看父是否應允了。這事聖靈在詩篇四十四篇指明並顯出,在那裡祂對子自己說:「耶和華你的神要用喜樂的油膏你,使你超過你的同伴。」祂的同伴曾是猶太人的祭司和君王,他們各人都確是被人所膏的。
1:216
sed quia filius a patre, deus a deo erat ungendus, secundum quod filius petiit et spiritus promissa nuntiauit, conpleuit pater in Iordane; quo cum ueniret filius dei, saluator noster, ad Iohannem ostensus est his uerbis: ecce agnus dei, hic est, qui tollit peccata mundi. descendit in aquam, non quia erat, quod in deo mundaretur, sed superuenturum oleum aqua debuit antecedere ad mysteria initianda et ordinanda et inplenda baptismatis ; lotus cum in Iohannis manibus haberetur, secutus est ordo mysterii et conpleuit pater, quod rogauerat filius et quod nuntiauerat spiritus sanctus.
But since the Son was to be anointed by the Father, God by God, according to what the Son asked and the Spirit announced as promised, the Father fulfilled it in the Jordan; and when the Son of God, our Savior, came there to John, He was pointed out with these words: 'Behold the Lamb of God; this is He who takes away the sins of the world.' He descended into the water, not because there was anything in God to be cleansed, but the oil that was to come ought to be preceded by the water, for the initiating, ordaining, and fulfilling of the mysteries of baptism; and when, having been washed, He was held in the hands of John, the order of the mystery followed, and the Father fulfilled what the Son had asked and what the Holy Spirit had announced.
但既然子要被父所膏,神要被神所膏,照著子所求、靈所宣告的應許,父就在約但河成就了;當神的兒子我們的救主來到約翰那裡時,祂被這話指出:「看哪,神的羔羊,這就是除去世人罪孽的。」祂下到水中,不是因為神裡面有甚麼需要潔淨的,乃是那將要來的油,當有水在先,為要創始、設立並成全洗禮的奧祕;當祂受了洗,仍在約翰手中時,奧祕的次序便隨之而來,父就成就了子所求、聖靈所宣告的。
1:217
apertum est caelum deo patre ungente, spiritale oleum statim in imagine columbae descendit et insedit capiti eius et perfudit eum: oleum digestum est, unde coepit dici Christus, quando unctus est a deo patre; cui ne manus inposita defuisse uideretur, uox audita est dei de nube dicentis: hic est filius meui, de quo bene sensi, hunc audite. hoc est igitur, quod lectum est: oleum peccatoris non ungat caput meum. rationem ueritatis, frater Parmeniane, uel sero addisce, quoniam nunc tempus est inuenire discendi. Et illud, quod in Salomone propheta lectum fesse dixisti:
Heaven was opened, with God the Father anointing; the spiritual oil at once descended in the image of a dove and settled upon His head and poured over Him: the oil was dispensed, whence He began to be called Christ, when He was anointed by God the Father; and lest the laying on of a hand should seem to be lacking to Him, the voice of God was heard from the cloud, saying: 'This is my Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear Him.' This therefore is what was read: 'Let not the oil of the sinner anoint my head.' Learn the reason of the truth, brother Parmenianus, even though late, since now is the time to find learning. And as for that which you said was read in Solomon the prophet:
天就開了,父神施行膏抹,屬靈的油立時以鴿子的形像降下,停在祂頭上,澆灌了祂:油被分賜,因此當祂被父神所膏時,便開始被稱為基督;又恐怕祂似乎缺了按手,便有神的聲音從雲中發出,說:「這是我的兒子,我所喜悅的,你們要聽祂。」所以這就是所讀的:「不要讓罪人的油塗抹我的頭。」帕米尼安弟兄,你雖遲了,也當學明真理的緣由,因為如今正是尋得學識的時候。至於你所說在先知所羅門書中讀到的:
1:218
filios adulterorum inconsummatos, et spuria uitulamina altas radices dare non posse, hoc et simpliciter dictum esse intellegi potest. unde si figuram facias, ueros adulteros excusasti. sed fac, ut figuraliter dictum sit: hoc de haereticis dictum est, apud quos sunt sacramentorum falsa conubia et iri quorum toris iniquitas inuenitur, ubi in exterminium fidei corrupta sunt semina. dum Ualentinus filium dei in phantasmatis, non in carne fuisse contendit, fidem suam suorumque corrupit. natiuitatis eorum semen exterminatum est, qui non crediderunt filium dei in carne natum de uirgine Maria et passum in carne.
that the children of adulterers come to no fulfillment, and that spurious slips cannot put down deep roots—this also can be understood as said simply. Hence if you make it a figure, you have excused real adulterers. But grant that it was said figuratively: this was said concerning heretics, among whom there are false marriages of the sacraments, and in whose beds iniquity is found, where the seeds have been corrupted to the destruction of the faith. While Valentinus contends that the Son of God existed in phantasms, not in flesh, he corrupted his own faith and that of his followers. The seed of their birth has been destroyed, of those who did not believe that the Son of God was born in the flesh of the Virgin Mary and suffered in the flesh.
說行淫者的兒女不得長成,私生的幼枝不能深深扎根——這話也可按字面單純理解。因此你若把它當作比喻,就替真正的行淫者開脫了。但就算是按比喻說的:這話乃是論到異端者,他們中間有聖禮的假婚配,在他們的床上有不義被尋見,那裡的種子已被敗壞,以致信德毀滅。當華倫提努辯稱神的兒子是存在於幻象中,不是在肉身中,他便敗壞了自己並跟從者的信德。他們出生的種子已被毀滅,就是那些不信神的兒子在肉身中由童女馬利亞所生、並在肉身中受苦的人。
1:219
Nam et illud, quod in Hieremia propheta te legisse commemoras, exhorruisse caelum, quod duo maligna fecerit populus dei, ut derelinquerent fontem aquae uiuae et foderent sibi lacus detritos, qui non possent aquam continere: legisti quidem, sed, ut se res habent, intellegere noluisti; studio criminandi ad conuicium catholicorum cuncta conponens multum ad arbitrium tuum declinare conatus es. si enim putas per prophetas sic dicta esse omnia, ut ad tempora nostra pertineant, excusasti Iudaeos, de quibus haec dicta esse constat, qui dimiserunt deum uiuum, deum uerum, deum, qui illis beneficia praestitit, et fecerunt sibi idola, hoc est lacus detritos, qui non possunt aquam continere.
Now also as for that which you mention you read in Jeremiah the prophet—that heaven shuddered, because the people of God did two evil things, that they forsook the fountain of living water and dug for themselves worn-out cisterns which could not hold water—you read it indeed, but, as the matter stands, you were unwilling to understand. Out of zeal for accusing, composing everything into a reproach of the Catholics, you tried hard to bend it greatly to your own pleasure. For if you think that everything was said by the prophets so as to pertain to our times, you have excused the Jews, concerning whom it is established that these things were said, who abandoned the living God, the true God, the God who bestowed benefits on them, and made for themselves idols, that is, worn-out cisterns which cannot hold water.
如今論到你提及在先知耶利米書中所讀的——天驚駭了,因為神的百姓行了兩件惡事,就是離棄活水的泉源,為自己鑿出破裂不能存水的池子——你固然讀了,但照事情本相,你卻不肯明白。你出於控告的熱心,把一切編造成對大公教徒的責備,竭力把它大大扭曲,遷就你自己的意思。因為你若以為先知所說的一切都是指我們這時代而言,你就替猶太人開脫了,這些話確是論到他們所說的,他們離棄了永活的神、真實的神、那向他們施恩的神,為自己造了偶像,就是破裂不能存水的池子。
1:220
in deo perennis maiestas exundat, sicut in fonte aqua largiter fluentibus uenis exuberat: idola uero si non fiant, non sunt, et lacus si non fodiantur, sinus capaces habere non possunt; lacus sine arte et ferramentis cauari non potest nec idolum sine artifice fieri potest. in idolis uirtus naturalis nulla est, sed hominum errore adiungitur et adplicatur; aestimatur in idolo uirtus, quae illic nata non est: lacus est arte detritus, cuius fabrica uexatio est, ut aquam nec de se habeat et acceptam continere non possit; sic et idolum nec de se est aliquid et, dum colitur, nihil est.
In God an everlasting majesty overflows, just as in a fountain water gushes abundantly with flowing veins: but idols, if they are not made, do not exist, and cisterns, if they are not dug, cannot have capacious hollows; a cistern cannot be hollowed out without skill and iron tools, nor can an idol be made without a craftsman. In idols there is no natural power, but it is attached and applied by the error of men; a power is reckoned in the idol which was not born there: a cistern is worn out by skill, whose making is its undoing, so that it neither has water of itself nor can hold what it receives; thus also an idol is neither anything of itself and, while it is worshipped, is nothing.
在神裡面有永恆的尊嚴洋溢,正如泉源中水藉流通的脈絡豐豐沛沛湧出:但偶像若不被造,就不存在,池子若不被鑿,就不能有容納的凹處;池子非靠技巧和鐵器不能鑿成,偶像非靠工匠不能造出。偶像裡面沒有天然的能力,乃是人的謬妄所附加、所加上的;人在偶像中估量出那不是生於其中的能力:池子是靠技巧鑿出的,它的製作就是它的敗壞,以致它本身既沒有水,也不能存住所領受的;偶像也是如此,本身既算不得甚麼,被人敬拜時,仍是虛無。
1:221
hoc est, quod dixit deus, duo mala fecisse populum suum, quia dereliquerunt fontem aquae uiuae et effossos ac detritos sibi fecerunt lacus. etenim Iudaeorum populus deseruerat ueram aquam, non nouerat maiestatem dei et idolorum inquinatam sectatus fuerat religionem. hoc est, quod dolet deus, hoc est, quod dicit caelum exhorruisse. nam et per Esaiam prophetam idem dei dolor est, dum in hoc duo testatur elementa, dum dicit: audi, caelum, et percipe auribus, terra: filios generaui et exaltaui, ipsi autem me dereliquerunt. quare non de hac lectione aliquid, frater Parmeniane, dixisti? an quia hic non est aqua nominata?
This is what God said, that His people did two evil things, because they forsook the fountain of living water and made for themselves cisterns dug out and worn down. For the people of the Jews had abandoned the true water, had not known the majesty of God, and had followed the defiled religion of idols. This is what grieves God, this is what He says heaven shuddered at. For through Isaiah the prophet there is the same grief of God, when in this matter He calls two elements to witness, when He says: 'Hear, O heaven, and give ear, O earth: I have begotten and exalted sons, but they have forsaken me.' Why then, brother Parmenianus, did you say nothing of this passage? Is it because here water is not named?
這就是神所說的,祂的百姓行了兩件惡事,因為他們離棄了活水的泉源,為自己造了鑿出破裂的池子。因為猶太人的百姓離棄了真水,不認識神的尊嚴,反隨從了偶像污穢的宗教。這就是神所悲傷的,這就是祂所說天驚駭的。因為神藉先知以賽亞也有同樣的悲傷,當祂在這事上呼召天地二元素作見證時,祂說:「天哪,要聽;地哪,要側耳;我養育了兒女,使他們高升,他們竟背棄了我。」帕米尼安弟兄,你為何對這段經文一言不發呢?是否因為這裡沒有提到水?
1:222
intellegeris enim studio criminandi sic pulsasse legem, ut, ubicumque aquam scriptam legeris, praestigiis quibusdam ad inuidiam conligeres, et euerriculo quodam malitiae argumentorum intexto ad te omnia, quae sunt bona, traxisti. nam qualis est tuus intellectus in hoc capitulo Hieremiae, cum clamet deus se desertum esse et sic effossos lacuspro se irascitur, non pro re sua; aqua. enim baptismatis res dei est, non deuset si putatis desertos esse, quando apud uos fuerunt, qui apud nos baptizati sunt, ut merito uestri desertores ad nos uenire uiderentur? probatum est ergo te non contra nos, sed contra uos dixisse, quod a te dictum est de oleo et sacrificio peccatoris.
For you are perceived to have, out of zeal for accusing, so assailed the Law that, wherever you have read water written, you would, by certain sleights of hand, collect it to stir up odium, and, by a kind of sweeping-net of malice woven from arguments, you have drawn to yourself all things that are good. For what kind is your understanding in this chapter of Jeremiah, when God cries out that He has been forsaken and the cisterns thus dug out—He is angry on His own behalf, not on behalf of His property; for the water of baptism is God's property, not God—and if you think them forsaken, since among you there were those who were baptized among us, so that your deserters might deservedly seem to come over to us? It is therefore proved that you spoke not against us, but against yourselves, what was said by you concerning the oil and sacrifice of the sinner.
因為人看出你出於控告的熱心,竟這樣攻擊律法,以致無論在哪裡讀到「水」字,你便藉著某種手法把它收集起來激起惡感,又藉著一種由論證織成的惡意拖網,把一切美善之事都拉到你自己身上。因為你在耶利米這一章中的悟性是怎樣的呢?當神呼喊說祂被離棄、池子被鑿出時——祂是為自己發怒,不是為祂的產業;因為洗禮的水是神的產業,不是神——你若以為他們是被離棄者,既然你們中間有人是在我們這裡受洗的,以致你們的離棄者理當看似投奔我們了?所以證明了,你論到罪人之油與祭物所說的,不是攻擊我們,乃是攻擊你們自己。
1:223
Traditores legis qui fuerint et auctores scismatis, in primo libro manifestissimis documentis ostendimus, et apud nos esse unam ueram ecclesiam catholicam secundo monstrauimus; tertio uero probauimus, quae aspere facta esse dicuntur, ad nos minime pertinere et uos magis peccatores esse indicio diuino docuimus. iam de baptismate hoc loco dicendum est; in qua re, quae nunc agitur, quaestio tota consistit, quod baptisma uestra uiolauit audacia, dum id uoluistis iterare, quod semel mandauit Christus esse faciendum. quod nec tu negas, frater Parmeniane, quia in principio tractatus tui multa contra uos pro nobis, quae sunt nostra, dixisti.
Who were the betrayers of the Law and the authors of the schism, we have shown in the first book by the most manifest documents, and that among us is the one true Catholic Church we demonstrated in the second; in the third indeed we proved that the things said to have been done harshly pertain not at all to us, and we taught by divine evidence that you are rather the sinners. Now in this place we must speak of baptism; in which matter, which is now treated, the whole question consists, namely that your boldness has violated baptism, since you wished to repeat that which Christ commanded to be done once. And this you do not deny, brother Parmenianus, since at the beginning of your treatise you said many things against yourselves on our behalf, which are ours.
誰是律法的出賣者、裂教的肇始者,我們已在第一卷中藉最明顯的文件證明了;我們中間有獨一真實的大公教會,我們已在第二卷中論證了;在第三卷中,我們確已證明那些據說行得苛刻的事,與我們毫不相干,並藉神的見證教導了你們才是罪人。如今在此處我們必須論及洗禮;當前所論的這事,整個問題就在於此,就是你們的膽妄玷污了洗禮,因為你們願意重複那基督命令只行一次的事。帕米尼安弟兄,這你並不否認,因為在你講論的開頭,你曾說了許多攻擊你們自己、為我們辯護的話,那些話正是我們的。
1:224
commemorasti enim in conparatione baptismatis semel factum esse dilunium et unam circumcisionem fuisse ad populum Iudaeorum. et cum haec initio dictionis tuae tractaueris, in processu tractatus tui tamen horum inmemor factus es inducendo duas aquas et argumentis de aqua uera et falsa dicturus principium sermonis tui insipienter praestruens ordinasti; infirmando confirmas sancti baptismatis unionem, de circumcisione Iudaica quasi fundamentum iactare uoluisti, quod baptisma christianorum in Hebraeorum circumcisione fuerat adumbratum; defendisti catholicam, dum inpugnas. etenim in progressu tractatus tui alterum te inanire professus es, ut alterum replere uidereris.
For in comparison with baptism you recalled that the Flood was done once, and that there was one circumcision for the people of the Jews. And although you treated these things at the beginning of your discourse, yet in the course of your treatise you became forgetful of them, by introducing two waters, and, about to argue with arguments concerning true and false water, you unwisely arranged the beginning of your discourse, building it up beforehand; by weakening it, you confirm the oneness of holy baptism; from the Jewish circumcision you wished to lay, as it were, a foundation, namely that the baptism of Christians had been foreshadowed in the circumcision of the Hebrews; you defended the Catholic Church while you attacked it. For in the progress of your treatise you professed to empty out the one, so that you might seem to fill up the other.
因為在與洗禮的比較中,你提到洪水只發生過一次,猶太人也只有一次割禮。雖然你在你話語的開頭論述了這些事,但在你講論的進程中,你卻把它們忘了,引進了兩種水,又要以論證辯論真水與假水,便不智地安排了你話語的開頭,預先建立它;你藉著削弱它,反倒堅固了聖洗禮的合一;你想從猶太人的割禮,彷彿打下根基,就是說基督徒的洗禮在希伯來人的割禮中已被預表;你攻擊大公教會的同時,反倒護衛了它。因為在你講論的進程中,你聲稱要倒空這一個,好叫你似乎填滿那一個。
← prev partnext part →
ch. 2 →
12