📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Commentary on Revelation & Paul

Primasius of Hadrumetum

Commentary on Revelation & Paul 1

Latin original · 326 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss

ch. 2 →
1:1
CAPUT PRIMUM. Paulus, id est pusillus et ultimus; ex Saulo Paulus, sicut et Abram Abraham, ut etiam ipso vocabulo novus esset. Servus Jesu Christi. Sic.., Isaias dicit: Magnum tibi cst vocari servum meum. Vocatus apostolus. Jam in præscientia ad hoc vocatus et prædestinatus, ut esset apostolus. Seyregatus. Sicut in AcUbus apostolorum dicit: Segregate mihi Paulum et Barnabam ad opus ad quod elegi eos. In Evangelium Dei, quod ante promiserat. Evangelium bona annuntiatio dicitur, et quod majus bonum quam natum et passum resurrexisse Christum pro nobis ? Per prophetas suos in Scripturis sanctis, de Filio suo, qui factus est ei.
CHAPTER ONE. 'Paul'—that is, small and least; from Saul, Paul, just as Abram became Abraham, so that even in his very name he might be new. 'A servant of Jesus Christ.' So Isaiah says: 'It is a great thing for thee to be called my servant.' 'Called an apostle.' Already in foreknowledge called and predestined to this, that he should be an apostle. 'Set apart.' As it says in the Acts of the Apostles: 'Set apart for me Paul and Barnabas for the work to which I have chosen them.' 'Unto the Gospel of God, which he had promised beforehand.' The Gospel is called good tidings; and what greater good than that Christ, born and having suffered, has risen again for us? 'Through his prophets in the holy Scriptures, concerning his Son, who was made to him.'
第一章。「保羅」——即微小的、末後的;由掃羅而成保羅,正如亞伯蘭成了亞伯拉罕,好叫他連名字本身也是新的。「耶穌基督的僕人。」以賽亞也如此說:「你稱為我的僕人乃是大事。」「蒙召作使徒。」在預知中他早已為此蒙召並被預定,就是要作使徒。「奉派分別出來。」正如使徒行傳所說:「要為我分派巴拿巴和保羅,去作我所召他們去作的工。」「歸於神的福音,就是神從前所應許的。」福音稱為好信息;還有什麼比基督為我們降生、受難、又復活更大的美善呢?「藉眾先知在聖經上論到祂兒子,這兒子是為祂而成的。」
1:2
Ad nutriendam Judæorum fidem, asserit se illum praedicare quem prophetæ annuntiaverunt in Scripturis sanctis. Totus locus iste eontra Manichaeos facit, qui alium Deum prophetarum, alium dicunt Novi Testamenti. Ex semine David. Ex Maria, quae de David stirpe venit, sicut Isaias dixit: Ecce Virgo in utero babebit, et pariet filium. Secundum carnem. Et Photinum exstinxit, et qui solitarium hominem dicit, non intelligens in Christo duas esse sub. stantias. Qui prædestinatus est Filius Dei in virtute secundum spiritum sanctificationis ex resurrectione mortuorum Jesu Christi Domini nostri.
To nourish the faith of the Jews, he asserts that he preaches that One whom the prophets announced in the holy Scriptures. This whole passage tells against the Manichaeans, who say that the God of the prophets is one and the God of the New Testament another. 'Of the seed of David.' Of Mary, who came from the stock of David, as Isaiah said: 'Behold, a virgin shall conceive in the womb and shall bear a son.' 'According to the flesh.' And this crushed Photinus, and him who says he is a mere man, not understanding that in Christ there are two substances. 'Who was predestined the Son of God in power, according to the spirit of sanctification, by the resurrection of the dead of Jesus Christ our Lord.'
為滋養猶太人的信心,他斷言自己所傳的正是眾先知在聖經上所宣告的那一位。這整段話都是駁斥摩尼教徒的,他們說先知的神是一位,新約的神是另一位。「從大衛的後裔生的。」即從馬利亞生的,她是出於大衛的宗族,正如以賽亞所說:「看哪,必有童女懷孕生子。」「按肉身說。」這話也粉碎了弗提努,並那說祂僅是一個人的,因他不明白在基督裡有二性。「按成聖的靈說,因從死裡復活,以大能顯明是神的兒子,就是我們的主耶穌基督。」
1:3
Praedestinatus est, ut prior omnibus resurgeret et filiis Dei viam resurrectionis aperiret, ut quomodo caput, sic et corpus ejus resurgeret. Per quem accepimus gratiam et apostolatum ad obediendum fidei in omnibus gentibus. Gratiam, ut credamus et baptizemur, et quia gratis et jam ipse justificatus est nullis meritis suis. Apostolatum vero accepit, quando directus est gentibus prædicare. Pro nomine ejus. Vice nominis ejus fungimur, sicut ipse dicit: Sicut misit me Pater, et ego mitto vos; et, Legatione fungimur pro Christo. In quibus estis et vos vocati Jetu Christi. Et in vobis Romanis apostolatum accepimus sicut et in omnibus gentibus. Omnibus qui sunt Romæ dilecti. Dei.
He was predestined to rise before all and to open to the sons of God the way of resurrection, so that as the head, so also his body might rise. 'Through whom we have received grace and apostleship unto the obedience of faith among all the nations.' Grace, that we might believe and be baptized, and because he himself was already justified freely by no merits of his own. But apostleship he received when he was sent to preach to the nations. 'For his name.' We discharge the office in place of his name, as he himself says: 'As the Father sent me, so I send you'; and, 'We act as ambassadors for Christ.' 'Among whom are you also, called of Jesus Christ.' And among you Romans also we received apostleship, as among all the nations. 'To all who are at Rome, beloved of God.'
祂被預定要在眾人之先復活,並為神的眾子開通復活的道路,好叫身體如同頭一樣復活。「藉著祂我們領受了恩典並使徒的職分,要在萬國中叫人為祂的名信服真道。」恩典,是叫我們得以相信並受洗,也因為祂自己已白白被稱義,並非憑自己的任何功勞。至於使徒的職分,是當祂被差遣向列國宣講時領受的。「為祂的名。」我們代表祂的名執行職分,正如祂自己所說:「父怎樣差遣了我,我也照樣差遣你們」;又說:「我們作基督的使者。」「其中也有你們這蒙耶穌基督所召的。」在你們羅馬人中,我們也領受了使徒的職分,正如在萬國中一樣。「寫信給一切在羅馬、為神所愛的人。」
1:4
Omnibus Dei fidelibas qui sunt Romæ, vocatis sanctis. Vocatione Dei sanctificatis, et gratia, non meritis operum suorum. Cratia vobis. Talis est ubique salutatio ejus, ut et commemoret beneficia Dei, et ea optet in nobis integra permanere, quia gratis nobis peccata donata sunt, non meritis nostris. Et pax a Deo Patre nostro et Domino Jesu Christo. Sicut ad Colossenses dicit: Pacificavit omnia quæ in coelo et quae in terra sunt, per sanguinem ejus, et quos redemit vult pacificos vivere. Primum quidem gratias ago Deo meo per Jetum Christum. Quia natura Deus omnium, merito et voluntate paucorum est, ideo dixit, Deo meo. Pro omnibus vobis. Non pro Judæis solis.
'To all the faithful of God who are at Rome, called to be saints.' Sanctified by the calling of God and by grace, not by the merits of their own works. 'Grace to you.' Such is his greeting everywhere, that he both recalls the benefits of God and desires that they remain whole in us, because our sins have been forgiven us freely, not by our merits. 'And peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.' As he says to the Colossians: 'He has made peace over all things which are in heaven and which are on earth, through his blood,' and those whom he has redeemed he wills to live peaceably. 'First indeed I give thanks to my God through Jesus Christ.' Because by nature he is the God of all, but by desert and will the God of few, therefore he said 'my God.' 'For you all.' Not for the Jews only.
「寫信給一切在羅馬、屬神信實的人,蒙召作聖徒的。」他們是藉神的呼召與恩典被分別為聖,並非憑自己行為的功勞。「願恩典歸與你們。」他各處的問安都是如此,既記念神的恩惠,又願望這恩惠在我們裡面得以完整保存,因為我們的罪是白白蒙赦免的,並非憑我們的功勞。「並有平安從我們的父神和主耶穌基督歸與你們。」正如他對歌羅西人所說:「藉著祂的血,使天上地上一切都與祂和好」,凡祂所救贖的,祂都願他們和睦度日。「第一,我藉著耶穌基督為你們眾人感謝我的神。」因為按本性祂是萬有的神,但按功德與意願卻是少數人的神,所以他說「我的神」。「為你們眾人。」不單為猶太人。
1:5
Quia fides vestra annuntiatur in universo mundo. Subtiliter laudat, ut provocet ad profectum. Et vere ubique fides clara est Romanorum. Fides, inqnit, vestra, fidem dixit esse illorum, quae sine dubio Dei, et a Deo illis infusa est; sed consuetudo Scripturae hoc habet, sicut in Evangelio ait Dominus: Nonne scriptum est in lege vestra, Quia ego dixi, Dii estis? Vel illud: Sicut scriptum est in lege eorum, Quia odio habuerunt me gratis; et alibi: Nunquid lex nostra damnat aliquem inauditum? Ita ergo fides eorum dicitur, sicut lex eo um, cum nullus ignoret quod lex a Deo sii, sicut et fidis. Testis enim mihi est Deus, cui tervio in spiritu meo, in Evangelio Filii ejus.
'Because your faith is proclaimed throughout the whole world.' He praises subtly, so as to spur them to progress. And truly the faith of the Romans is everywhere renowned. He says 'your faith,' calling the faith theirs, which without doubt is God's and was infused into them by God; but the custom of Scripture holds this, as in the Gospel the Lord says: 'Is it not written in your law, I said, You are gods?' Or that: 'As it is written in their law, They hated me without cause'; and elsewhere: 'Does our law judge any man without a hearing?' So then their faith is spoken of, just as their law, though no one is ignorant that the law is from God, as is faith also. 'For God is my witness, whom I serve in my spirit, in the Gospel of his Son.'
「因你們的信德傳遍了天下。」他微妙地稱讚,好激勵他們長進。羅馬人的信德確實處處著名。他說「你們的信德」,稱這信德為他們的,這信德無疑是屬神的,是神所澆灌給他們的;但聖經的慣例便是如此,正如主在福音書中所說:「你們的律法上豈不是寫著『我曾說你們是神』麼?」或那句:「這要應驗他們律法上所寫的話,說:『他們無故恨我』」;又在別處:「不聽本人的口供,我們的律法豈能定他的罪麼?」所以說是他們的信德,正如說是他們的律法,雖然無人不知律法出於神,信德也是如此。「我在靈裡事奉的神,就是我在傳祂兒子福音上所事奉的神,可以為我作見證。」
1:6
Hoc est, cui in toto corda mco prompta devotione et plena veritate deserv o. Quod sine intermissione memoriam vestri facio, semper in orationibus meis obsecrans. Hic ostendit se omnia cum dilectione dicturum, ut ab his libentius audiatur, et dat exemplum sine intermissione orandi. Si quomodo tandem aliquando prosperum iter habeam in voluntate Dei veniendi ad vos. Desidero enim videre vos, ut aliquid impertiar vobis gratiæ spiritualis.
That is, whom I serve with my whole heart in ready devotion and full sincerity. 'That without ceasing I make mention of you, always in my prayers beseeching.' Here he shows that he will say everything with love, so that he may be heard by them the more gladly, and he gives an example of praying without ceasing. 'If by any means at length I may have a prosperous journey, by the will of God, to come to you. For I long to see you, that I may impart to you some spiritual grace.'
即,我以全心、以殷勤的虔誠與完全的真誠所事奉的那位。「我不住地提到你們,在禱告中常常懇求。」他在此顯明他所說的一切都出於愛心,好叫他們更樂意聽從,並樹立不住禱告的榜樣。「或者照神的旨意,終能得平坦的道路往你們那裡去。因為我切切地想見你們,要把些屬靈的恩賜分給你們。」
1:7
Aliter etiam prosperum iter non habeo, nisi me voluntas Dei, quae omnia novit, et in bonis omnibus nos prævenit, et praecedit, et fovet, illo direxerit, ubi frucIum aliquem habeam, sicut de apostolis legimus, eos alio ire volentes, alio destinatos, non eo isse quo volebant, sed quo eos Deus misisset, sciens quando et ad quos ire deberent. Ad confirmandos vos. Hic ostendit, qualiter eos superius laudaverit qui ad confirmandum adhuc gratiae indigent spiritalis. Id eat, simul consolari in vobis per eam quce invicem est fidem vestram atque meam. Ut per communem fidem invicem consolemur, et de illuminatione sancti Spiritus invicem gratulemur.
Otherwise too I have no prosperous journey, unless the will of God—which knows all things, and goes before us and precedes and cherishes us in all good things—should direct me thither where I may have some fruit; as we read of the apostles, that when they wished to go to one place they were destined for another, and did not go where they wished, but where God had sent them, knowing when and to whom they ought to go. 'To confirm you.' Here he shows in what manner he praised them above—those who still need spiritual grace for their confirming. 'That is, that I may be comforted together in you through that faith which is mutually yours and mine.' That through the common faith we may be mutually comforted, and may mutually rejoice at the illumination of the Holy Spirit.
此外,我也沒有平坦的道路,除非那知曉萬事、並在一切善事上先於我們、行在我們前面又眷顧我們的神旨意,將我引往我可得果子之處;正如我們讀到使徒的事:他們願往一處去,卻被指定往另一處,並未去他們所願之地,乃去神所差他們之處,因神知道他們當在何時、往何人那裡去。「要堅固你們。」他在此顯明他上文如何稱讚他們——那些仍需屬靈恩賜以得堅固的人。「這就是我在你們中間,因你我彼此的信心,同得安慰。」即藉著共同的信德,我們可彼此得安慰,並為聖靈的光照彼此歡欣。
1:8
Nolo enim vos ignorare, fratres, quia sæpe proposui venire ad vos. Per commeantes enim fratres audire potuistis dispositionem meam. Et prohibitus sum* usque adhuc. Id est occupatus, dum aliis provinciis praedico, vel revelatione prohibilus, vel forte, sicut alibi dicit: Impedivit nos Sata. nas. Ut aliquem fructum habeam in vobis. Mercedem laboris sui nominat fructum. Sicut et in cæteri, gentibus, Græcis ac barbaris. Subaudilur habeo. Sapientibus et insipientibus debitor sum. Sapientes Graecos dicit, apud quos omnis philosophia est; insipientes barbaros appelat. Ita quod in me promptum est. Paratum est in me. Et vobis qui Romæ estis evangelizare. Æque ut sapientibus Graecis.
'For I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that I have often purposed to come to you.' For through the brethren coming and going you could have heard of my intention. 'And have been hindered until now.' That is, occupied while I preach in other provinces, or hindered by revelation, or perhaps, as he says elsewhere: 'Satan hindered us.' 'That I might have some fruit among you also.' He calls the reward of his labor 'fruit.' 'As also among the other nations, both Greeks and barbarians.' Understand 'I have.' 'I am debtor to the wise and to the foolish.' By 'wise' he means the Greeks, among whom is all philosophy; by 'foolish' he calls the barbarians. 'So, as much as is in me, ready.' It is prepared in me. 'To preach the Gospel to you also who are at Rome.' Equally as to the wise Greeks.
「弟兄們,我不願意你們不知道,我屢次定意往你們那裡去。」因為藉著來往的弟兄,你們本可聽聞我的心意。「只是到如今仍有阻隔。」即,當我在別的省份傳道時忙碌,或被啟示所攔阻,或許如他在別處所說:「撒但阻擋了我們。」「叫我在你們中間也得些果子。」他稱自己勞苦的報酬為「果子」。「正如在其餘外邦人中,無論是希臘人、化外人。」當補上「我得果子」。「無論是智慧人、愚拙人,我都欠他們的債。」他以「智慧人」指希臘人,一切哲學都在他們中間;以「愚拙人」稱化外人。「所以,情願盡我的力量。」這在我裡面已預備妥當。「將福音也傳給你們在羅馬的人。」與傳給智慧的希臘人同樣。
1:9
Non enim erubesco Evanglium. Hoc subtiliter ad taxationem pertinet paganorum, qui merito de incestatoribus diis suis deberent erubescere: nec tamen erubescunt Deum suum Jovem credere, et erubescendum putant, Dominum propter salutem imagin I suæ credere, crucifixum cum in altero dedecus, in altero sit insigne virtutis. Et contra eos qui negant Christum in carne, et erubescunt nalivitatem Domini et crucem, qui putant hæc indigna Deo, non intelligentes nihil dignius Deo quam quod ad humanam salutem proficit. Nam si incredulisstultitia est, sed credentibus Dei virtus, et Dei sapientia. Virtu, enim Dei est in salutem.
'For I am not ashamed of the Gospel.' This subtly pertains to the censure of the pagans, who deservedly ought to be ashamed of their incestuous gods, yet are not ashamed to believe their god Jupiter, and think it a thing to be ashamed of to believe the Lord crucified for the salvation of his own image—whereas in the one is disgrace, in the other is the mark of virtue. And it is against those who deny Christ in the flesh, and are ashamed of the nativity and the cross of the Lord, who think these things unworthy of God, not understanding that nothing is more worthy of God than what avails for human salvation. For if to unbelievers it is folly, yet to believers it is the power of God and the wisdom of God. 'For it is the power of God unto salvation.'
「我不以福音為恥。」這話微妙地指向對異教徒的譴責,他們理當以自己那些亂倫的神為恥,卻不以相信他們的神朱庇特為恥,反倒以相信主為拯救祂自己的形像而被釘十字架為可恥——然而在前者是羞辱,在後者卻是美德的標記。這話也駁斥那些否認基督成了肉身的人,他們以主的誕生和十字架為恥,認為這些事於神不配,卻不明白:沒有什麼比有益於人類救恩的事更配得上神。因為這對不信的人是愚拙,對相信的人卻是神的大能與神的智慧。「因為這是神的大能,要救一切相信的。」
1:10
Nulla major virtus est quam devicta morte, homini vitam perditam reddere, quamvis infirmitas, id est humanitas, in virtute, hoc est in divinitate, incredibilis videatur incredulis. Omni credenti, Judoco primum et Græco; justitia enim Dei in eo revelatur. Ut quomodo Abraham credens es gentibus per fidem salvatus est, ita et cæteri credentes salventur. Ex fide in fidem, sicut scriptum est: Justus autem ex fide mea vivit. Ex fide Veteris Testamenti justificatur Judæus, ex Novi, gentilis, dum Judæus credit quod hoc ante prophetie prædixerint. Item aliter: Ex fide præsenti in futura, quia fides ad invisibilia pertinet, quæ et sub Veteri Testamento, ct in Novo duno Dei infusa est. Et ideo dicit:
There is no greater power than, death being overcome, to restore to man the life he had lost—although the weakness, that is the humanity, in the power, that is in the divinity, may seem incredible to unbelievers. 'To everyone who believes, to the Jew first and to the Greek; for the righteousness of God is revealed in it.' That, just as Abraham believing was saved from among the nations through faith, so also the rest who believe may be saved. 'From faith unto faith, as it is written: But the just shall live by my faith.' By the faith of the Old Testament the Jew is justified, by that of the New the Gentile, since the Jew believes that the prophecies foretold this beforehand. Again, otherwise: from present faith unto future, because faith pertains to things invisible, which was infused as a gift of God both under the Old Testament and in the New. And therefore he says:
沒有比這更大的能力:勝過死亡,將人所失去的生命歸還給人——雖然那軟弱,即人性,處於那能力、即神性之中,在不信者看來似乎難以置信。「先是猶太人,後是希臘人,一切相信的人;因為神的義正在這福音上顯明出來。」即,正如亞伯拉罕相信便從列國中因信得救,其餘相信的人也照樣得救。「這義是本於信,以致於信,如經上所記:『義人必因我的信得生。』」猶太人是因舊約的信稱義,外邦人是因新約的信稱義,因為猶太人相信眾先知早已預言此事。再者,另有一解:從現今的信到將來的信,因為信是關乎那看不見之事的,這信在舊約之下與在新約之中都是作神的恩賜被澆灌的。所以他說:
1:11
Justus autem ex fide mea vivit. Revelatur enim ira Dei de carlo. Contra partem gentium loquitur, dicitque Dei iram per Evangelium revelari. Noverant enim homines et benefic a et plagas exspectare de cœlis. Super omnem impietatem et injustitiam hominum. Prima impietas in Deum, peccare est aut pcr blasphemiam, aut per contemptum. Alia in parentes, aut injuria, aut despectu. Tertia in extraneum, quia omne contrarium pietati impietas est. Quarta in semetipsos, sicut Sapientia dicit: Qui autem peccant in me, impie faciunt in suas animas. Sive omnem impietatem, quia diversae sunt idolorum culturæ, ut impietas ad injuriam Dei, injustitia ad omnia peccata referatur.
'But the just shall live by my faith. For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven.' He speaks against the party of the Gentiles, and says that God's wrath is revealed through the Gospel. For men had known to expect both benefits and plagues from the heavens. 'Against all impiety and injustice of men.' The first impiety is against God, to sin either by blasphemy or by contempt. Another is against parents, either by injury or by scorn. A third is against the stranger, since everything contrary to piety is impiety. A fourth is against one's own self, as Wisdom says: 'But those who sin against me do impiously against their own souls.' Or 'all impiety,' because the cults of idols are diverse—so that impiety refers to injury against God, injustice to all sins.
「義人必因我的信得生。原來神的忿怒從天上顯明出來。」他是針對外邦人一方說話,說神的忿怒藉福音顯明出來。因為人本知道要從天上等候福分與災殃。「向著人一切的不虔不義。」第一種不虔是干犯神,就是藉褻瀆或藉藐視而犯罪。第二種是干犯父母,或藉傷害,或藉輕蔑。第三種是干犯外人,因為凡與虔敬相反的都是不虔。第四種是干犯自己,正如智慧書所說:「凡得罪我的,是傷害自己的性命。」或說「一切不虔」,因為拜偶像的種種名目各異——使「不虔」指對神的冒犯,「不義」指一切罪。
1:12
Eorum qui veritatem in justitia detinent. Qui veritatem nominis Dei in injustitia indignæ materiæ detinent idolorum. Quia quod notum est Dei, manifestum est iii illis. Omnis creatura ostendit se non esse Deum, sed esse alium qui eam fecerit, cui servitio parere necesse sit, naturaliter enim potest scire de Deo quod sit, et quod juslus sit, et ipsa creatura non esse a semelipsa, quia major per omnia omnibus nulla est, quia omnes se alterutram vincunt, aliæ magnitudine, ut cœlum; aliæ claritate, ut sol, et luna, vel stellæ præclaræ. Deus enim illis manifestavit. Virtutes ejus occultae ex iis quæ palam sunt manifestantur.
'Of those who hold the truth in injustice.' Who hold the truth of God's name in the injustice of the unworthy matter of idols. 'Because that which is known of God is manifest in them.' Every creature shows itself not to be God, but that there is another who made it, whom it is necessary to obey in service; for it can naturally know of God that he exists, and that he is just, and that the creature itself is not from itself, because there is none greater through all things than all, since all mutually surpass one another—some in magnitude, as the heaven; others in brightness, as the sun and the moon or the resplendent stars. 'For God has manifested it to them.' His hidden powers are made manifest from those things which are plain.
「就是那些行不義阻擋真理的人。」他們以偶像那不配之物的不義,阻擋神之名的真理。「神的事情,人所能知道的,原顯明在人心裡。」一切受造之物都顯明自己不是神,乃是有另一位造了它,人必須服事順從那一位;因為受造之物本性上能知道神存在、且知道神是公義的,並知道受造之物本身並非出於自己,因為沒有一物在萬事上大過萬物,既然萬物彼此互有超越——有的在體量上,如天;有的在光輝上,如日、月,或那些燦爛的眾星。「因為神已經給他們顯明。」祂隱藏的能力,從那些明顯之事顯明出來。
1:13
Invisibilia enim ipsius a creatura mundi per ea quce facta sunt intellecta conspiciuntur. Si enim ea quæ videntur tam praeclara, ab illo facia sunt, ut quidam illa deos putarent, quanto magis factorem sempiternum intelliigere potuerunt? Sempiterna quoque ejus virtus et divinitas, ut sint inexcusabiles. Ergo Christus sempiternus, quia Dd virtus et Dei sapientia est. Quia cum cognovissent Deum. Quomodo cognoverunt? sive ex conscientia per insitam sibi rationem, sive ex mundi factura, quia omnia mutabilia sunt, solus Deus incommutabilis. Non sicut Deum glorificaverunt. Non illum per suam magnitudinum venerati sunt, sed pro Deo idola coluerunt. Aut gratias egerunt.
'For his invisible things, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made.' For if the things which are seen are so resplendent, made by him that some thought them gods, how much more could they have understood the eternal Maker? 'His eternal power also and divinity, so that they are inexcusable.' Therefore Christ is eternal, since he is the power of God and the wisdom of God. 'Because, when they had known God.' How did they know him? Either from conscience through the reason implanted in them, or from the fashioning of the world, because all things are mutable, God alone unchangeable. 'They did not glorify him as God.' They did not venerate him through his own greatness, but worshiped idols in place of God. 'Or give thanks.'
「自從造天地以來,神那看不見的事,藉著所造之物,就可以曉得,眼不能見的也清楚可見。」因為若那看得見之物如此燦爛、且是祂所造,以致有些人竟以它們為神,他們豈不更能明白那永恆的創造者麼?「就是祂的永能和神性,叫人無可推諉。」所以基督是永恆的,因祂是神的大能與神的智慧。「因為他們雖然知道神。」他們怎樣知道呢?或是藉良心、藉那植於他們裡面的理性,或是從世界的受造,因為萬物都會變遷,惟獨神不改變。「卻不當作神榮耀祂。」他們沒有藉祂自己的偉大來敬奉祂,反倒以偶像代替神來崇拜。「也不感謝祂。」
1:14
Quia rationabiles ab eo facti sunt. Sed evanuerunt in cogitationibus suis. Putantes se Dei magnitudinem posse comprehendere. Et obscuratum est insipiens cor eorum. Recedentes uliquc a limine veritatis, creaturam pro Creatore venerando, verum lumen, id est Dei sapientiam perdiderunt. Dicentes enim se esse sapientes. Quasi qui invenirent quomodo invisibilis Deus in simulacrum visibile coleretur. Stulti facti sunt. Non intelligentes Deum non esse, quem homo fecisset. Et mutaverunt gloriam incorruptibilis Dei in similitudinem imaginis corruptibilis hominis et volucris et quadrupedum et serpentum.
Because they were made rational by him. 'But they became vain in their thoughts.' Thinking that they could comprehend God's greatness. 'And their foolish heart was darkened.' Departing indeed from the threshold of truth, by venerating the creature in place of the Creator, they lost the true light, that is, the wisdom of God. 'For, saying that they were wise.' As though they had found out how the invisible God might be worshiped in a visible image. 'They became fools.' Not understanding that he whom man had made is not God. 'And they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and of four-footed beasts, and of serpents.'
因為他們是被祂造成有理性的。「他們的思念變為虛妄。」以為自己能測度神的偉大。「無知的心就昏暗了。」他們既離開真理的門檻,以崇拜受造之物代替造物主,便失去了真光,即神的智慧。「他們自稱為聰明。」彷彿他們已尋出如何在有形的像中敬拜那無形的神。「反成了愚拙。」不明白人所造的並非神。「將不能朽壞之神的榮耀,變為偶像,彷彿必朽壞的人和飛禽、走獸、昆蟲的樣式。」
1:15
Hic Jovis cultores appellat, quem propter amores fœdissimos toties asserunt transformatum, velut in cygnum, et taurum. Propter quod tradidit iUlo. Deus in desidena cordis corum. Tradere dicitur Deus, dum non retinet delinquentes justo judicio, propter arbitrii libertatem ad malum promptissimam. Derelinquit autem dereliquentes se, sicut dicit per Prophetam: Si autem reliqueritis cum, et ipse relinquet vos. Et iIlud: Dimisi eos secundum desideria cordis eorum, et ibunt in voluptatibus suis. In immunditiam. Quæ est in turpibus mysteriis idolorum. Ut contumeliis officiant corpora sua. Dum sibi characteres et ustiones infligunt in consecrationibus idolorum. In semetipsis.
Here he names the worshipers of Jupiter, whom, on account of his most foul love affairs, they so often assert to have been transformed, as into a swan and a bull. 'Wherefore God gave them up.' 'God, in the desire of their heart.' God is said to give up while he does not restrain the delinquents, by just judgment, on account of the liberty of the will most prone to evil. And he forsakes those who forsake him, as he says through the Prophet: 'But if you forsake him, he also will forsake you.' And that: 'I let them go according to the desires of their heart, and they shall walk in their own inclinations.' 'Unto uncleanness.' Which is in the shameful mysteries of idols. 'That they should afflict their own bodies with insults.' While in the consecrations of idols they inflict on themselves brandings and burnings. 'In themselves.'
他在此指那些拜朱庇特的人,因朱庇特那些極其污穢的情事,他們屢次斷言他曾變形,如變作天鵝與公牛。「所以神任憑他們。」「神照他們心裡的情慾。」說神「任憑」,是指祂憑公義的審判,因意志極易傾向於惡的自由,而不約束那些犯罪的人。祂便撇棄那些撇棄祂的人,正如祂藉先知所說:「你們若離棄祂,祂也必離棄你們。」又如:「我便任憑他們心裡剛硬,隨自己的計謀而行。」「陷在污穢中。」就是在偶像那可恥的奧祕中。「以致彼此凌辱、褻瀆自己的身體。」他們在祝聖偶像時,在自己身上烙印、灼傷。「在他們自己身上。」
1:16
Vitam quam amantes nec sibi parcant, ut etiam in hoc erroris sui cœnam perferant. Qui commuta erunt veritatem Dei iu mendacium. Transtulerunt veri Dei culturam in mendacium idolorum, qui falso pro diis habentur, fallunt cnim, dum hoc se mentiuntur esse quod non sunt. Et coluerunt et servierunt creaturæ po ius quam Crea'ori. Non solum dixerunt, sed etiam servierunt, et quicunque alicujus creaturæ cupiditate vincitur, ipsi servit; a quo enim quis vincitur. hujus et servus est, in tantum ut et venter sit Deus. Qui est benedictus in sæcula. Cui si servissent, et ipsi benedicli in saecula fieri potuerunt. Maledicti ergo, et temporales cffecti sunt, qui benedictum in saecula reliquerunt.
Life, which though they love, they do not spare themselves, so that in this too they carry through the feast of their error. 'Who changed the truth of God into a lie.' They transferred the worship of the true God into the lie of idols, which are falsely held for gods; for they deceive, since they lyingly claim to be that which they are not. 'And worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator.' They not only said it, but even served; and whoever is overcome by desire of any creature serves it—for by whatever a man is overcome, of this he is also the slave, so much so that even the belly becomes a god. 'Who is blessed forever.' Had they served him, they too could have become blessed forever. Cursed therefore and made temporal are they who forsook him who is blessed forever.
生命——他們雖愛之,卻不愛惜自己,以致連在此事上也貫徹他們謬妄的筵席。「他們將神的真實變為虛謊。」他們把對真神的敬拜,轉移到偶像的虛謊上,那些偶像被虛假地當作神;因為它們行欺騙,既謊稱自己是它們所不是的。「去敬拜事奉受造之物,不敬奉那造物的主。」他們不僅口說,甚至去事奉;凡被任何受造之物的貪慾所勝的,便去事奉它——因為人被誰制伏,就是誰的奴僕,以致連肚腹也成了神。「主乃是可稱頌的,直到永遠。」他們若事奉了祂,也本可永遠成為蒙福的。所以他們被咒詛、成了短暫的,因他們離棄了那永遠可稱頌的主。
1:17
De talibus enim dicitur: Similiter odio sunt impius, et impietas ejus. Amen. Vere, sive fideliter. Propterea tradidit illos Deus in passiones ignominice. Propter causas superius memoratas etiam in his flagitiis dimissi sunt, ut passio vitii jam poena peccati sit. Nam feminæ eorum. Ideo ipsa crimina, evidenter expressit, ut cognoscas eos rationem perdidisse naturae, qui tamen amentes effecti sunt, ut omnia perverterent, in Deum perversi; neque enim ordinem naturæ servare possunt, qui auctorem naturæ dereliquerunt. Immutaverunt naturalem usum in eum usum qui est contra naturam. Omnia perverterunt, sicut scriptum est. Infandorum enim idolorum cultura omnis mali caput est, et initium, et finis.
For concerning such it is said: 'Alike hateful to God are the impious man and his impiety.' 'Amen.' Truly, or faithfully. 'For this cause God gave them up to passions of dishonor.' On account of the causes mentioned above, they were given over even into these disgraceful deeds, so that the passion of the vice is already the punishment of the sin. 'For their women.' He therefore expressly stated these very crimes, that you might recognize that they had lost the reason of nature—they who nonetheless were made senseless, so as to pervert all things, being perverted against God; for those cannot keep the order of nature who have forsaken the Author of nature. 'They changed the natural use into that use which is against nature.' They perverted all things, as it is written. For the worship of unspeakable idols is the head of all evil, and its beginning, and its end.
因為論到這樣的人,經上說:「不虔的人和他的不虔,同為神所憎惡。」「阿們。」意即真實地,或忠誠地。「所以神任憑他們放縱可羞恥的情慾。」因上文所提的緣故,他們甚至被交於這些可恥的行為,以致惡行的情慾本身已成了罪的刑罰。「他們的婦女。」他因此明確陳明這些罪行,好叫你認出他們已喪失了本性的理智——他們竟變得如此昏昧,以致顛倒萬事,與神為敵而悖逆;因為凡離棄本性之創造者的,便不能持守本性的次序。「把順性的用處變為逆性的用處。」他們顛倒了萬事,正如經上所記。因為對那不可言喻之偶像的崇拜,乃是一切罪惡的源頭、開端與結局。
1:18
Similiter autem et masculi, relicto naturali usu feminæ. Quomodo enim ordinem naturæ servassent, auctore naturae derelicto? Exarserunt in desiderii. suis, invicem masculi in masculos turpitudinem operantes. Effrenata libido modum servare non novit. Et mercedem quam oportuit erroris sui in semetipsis recipientes. S c currit ordo, ut qui Domini obliti fuerant, nec se ipsos cognoscerent. Et sicut non probaverunt Dominum. Non nescierunt, sed minime probaverunt. lUe enim Dominum probat habere se in notitia, qui semper taHquam praesentem timet, et peccare non audet. Tradidit eos Deus in reprobum sensum. Id est, relicti sunt in reprobum sensum. Ut faciant quæ non convenit.
'Likewise also the males, leaving the natural use of the woman.' For how could they keep the order of nature, having forsaken the Author of nature? 'Burned in their lusts one toward another, males working shame with males.' Unbridled lust knows not how to keep measure. 'And receiving in themselves the recompense which was fitting for their error.' So runs the order, that those who had forgotten the Lord should not even know themselves. 'And as they did not approve to have the Lord.' They were not ignorant, but they by no means approved him. For he approves that he has the Lord in his knowledge who always fears him as though present, and dares not to sin. 'God gave them over to a reprobate mind.' That is, they were left to a reprobate mind. 'To do those things which are not fitting.'
「男人也是如此,棄了女人順性的用處。」他們既離棄了本性的創造者,怎能持守本性的次序呢?「慾火攻心,彼此貪戀,男和男行可羞恥的事。」放縱的情慾不知持守節度。「就在自己身上受這妄為當得的報應。」次序便是如此:那些忘記主的人,連自己也不認識。「他們既不喜歡認識神。」他們並非不知道,乃是根本不肯認可祂。因為那總是敬畏神如同祂在面前、不敢犯罪的人,才是認可自己心中認識主的。「神就任憑他們存邪僻的心。」即,他們被撇下,落入邪僻的心。「行那些不合宜的事。」
1:19
Quae non conveniunt homini facere. Repletos omni iniquitate et malitia. luiquitalem et malitiam principales causas ostendit esse vitiorum. Fornicatione, avaritia. Fornicationem et avaritiam simul junxit, quia utræque passiones idololatriæ comparantur, sicut dixit in Exodo: Fornicati sunt a Deo suo propter idoli sordem. Nam fornicatio est Christiano alicui rei adhaerere prætorquam neo, ct multis cupiditatibus corrumpi. Unde dicit Paulus, se uni viro nos virginem castam spopoudisse. Nequitia. Ideo insatiabilis est avaritia, quia post Dei divitias quantumvis quis habeat, parum est. Plenos inividia, homicidio.
'Things which are not fitting for a man to do.' 'Filled with all iniquity and malice.' He shows that iniquity and malice are the chief causes of the vices. 'With fornication, avarice.' He joined fornication and avarice together, because both passions are likened to idolatry, just as he said in Exodus: 'They committed fornication against their God because of the filth of the idol.' For fornication, for a Christian, is to cleave to any thing other than to God, and to be corrupted by many desires. Whence Paul says that he has espoused us as a chaste virgin to one husband. 'Wickedness.' Avarice is insatiable for this reason, that after the riches of God, however much a man may have, it is too little. 'Full of envy, of murder.'
「人所不當行的事。」「充滿各樣的不義與惡毒。」他指出不義與惡毒乃是諸惡的主要根源。「淫亂、貪婪。」他將淫亂與貪婪並列,因為這兩種情慾都被比作拜偶像,正如他在《出埃及記》中所說:「他們因偶像的污穢而離棄神行了淫亂。」因為對基督徒而言,淫亂就是依附於神以外的任何事物,並被眾多情慾所敗壞。因此保羅說,他已把我們如同貞潔的童女許配給一位丈夫。「邪惡。」貪婪之所以永不知足,是因為即使在神的財富之後,人無論擁有多少,仍嫌太少。「滿心是嫉妒、兇殺。」
1:20
Pulchre homicidium invidiæ sociavit, quia prima hnjus criminis ip a materia est, quia primum homicidium et diaboli et Cain de invidia natum est. Contentione. Contentio est, ubi non ratione aliquid, sed animi pertinacia defenditur, et ubi non,.critas quæritur, sed animositas fatigatur. Primitus fraterni Meteris causa ex contentione evenit. Dolo, malignitate. Dnlus est occulta malitia blandis sermonibus adornata. Susurrones. Murmuratores, non in facie, sed in aure loquentes, vel de quibus dicitur, Neque murmuraveritis. Detractores Deo odibiles.
Fittingly did he associate murder with envy, because envy is the very first matter of this crime, for the first murder, both of the devil and of Cain, was born of envy. 'Strife.' Strife is where something is defended not by reason but by obstinacy of mind, and where truth is not sought but animosity is worn out. The first cause of a brother's death arose from strife. 'Deceit, malignity.' Deceit is hidden malice adorned with flattering words. 'Whisperers.' Murmurers, who speak not to the face but into the ear; or of whom it is said, 'Neither murmur ye.' Detractors hateful to God.
他恰當地將兇殺與嫉妒聯繫在一起,因為嫉妒正是這罪行最初的根源,因為魔鬼與該隱最初的兇殺都是從嫉妒生出來的。「爭競。」爭競就是不憑理性、而憑心思的頑固去維護某事,不尋求真理、卻徒然發洩敵意。弟兄之死的最初起因便出於爭競。「詭詐、惡毒。」詭詐乃是以諂媚言語裝飾的隱藏惡意。「讒毀的。」就是那些不當面、卻在耳邊私語的人;或就是那被論及的:「你們也不要發怨言。」為神所憎惡的毀謗者。
1:21
De factores Deo odibiles, quia nihil tam odibile Deo quam idololatria, cui detractio comparatur, cum et idololatra et detractor eradicandi a Scriptura dicantur. Contumetiosos. Qui veloces sunt in verborum injuriis. Superbos. Qui vult supergredi quod est, superbus dicitur, sicut diabelus, qui prodidit hoc quod fuit. Et qui super alios vult esse, infra se fiet. Elatos, imentores malorum. Elatus est qui effertur supra mensuras suas. Parentibus non obedientes. Hoc loco et doctores intellig pussunt, parentes animarum. Insipientes. Quia ab ipso fonte sapientis recesserunt. Incompositos. Omnis insipiens inordinatus. Sine affectione, absque honore. Affectio est adimpletio charitatis.
'Detractors hateful to God,' because nothing is so hateful to God as idolatry, to which detraction is compared, since both the idolater and the detractor are said by Scripture to be rooted out. 'Insolent.' Those who are swift in verbal injuries. 'Proud.' He who wishes to surpass what he is, is called proud, like the devil, who forfeited that which he was. And he who wishes to be above others, shall be made lower than himself. 'Haughty, inventors of evils.' The haughty man is one who is lifted up beyond his measure. 'Disobedient to parents.' In this place teachers too can be understood, the parents of souls. 'Foolish.' Because they have withdrawn from the very fount of wisdom. 'Undisciplined.' Every fool is disordered. 'Without natural affection, without honour.' Affection is the fulfilment of charity.
「為神所憎惡的毀謗者」,因為沒有什麼比拜偶像更為神所憎惡,而毀謗正被比作拜偶像,因為聖經說拜偶像者與毀謗者都要被剪除。「侮慢的。」就是在言語傷害上敏捷急切的人。「狂傲的。」凡想超越自己本分的,就稱為狂傲,如同魔鬼一樣,牠喪失了自己原有的地位。凡想凌駕他人之上的,必被貶到自己之下。「自誇的、製造惡事的。」自誇的人就是被高舉超過自己分寸的人。「違背父母的。」在此處「父母」也可理解為教師,即靈魂的父母。「無知的。」因為他們離棄了智慧的本源。「無紀律的。」凡愚昧的人都是失序的。「無親情的、無敬意的。」親情乃是愛德的成全。
1:22
Sine misericordia. Quomodo poterant aliis misereri, qui in se misericordes esse noluerunt? Qui cum justitiam Dei cognovissent. Per hoc, quod eis naturaliter displicet malum, Dei justitiam cognoverunt. Non intellexerunt. Qui si intellexissent, timuissent; si timuissent, nunquam tal a commisissent. Quoniam qui talia agunt, digni sunt morte. Judicii Dei, etsi non in praesentia, futuram tamen non effugient poenam. Non solum qui ea faciunt, sed et qui consentiunt facientibus. Consentiunt suscipiendo doctrinam, vel connivendo [alias convivendo]. CAP. II. Propter quod inexcusabilis es, o homo omnis qui judicas. In quo enim judicas alterum, teipsum condemnas; eadem enim agit quæ judicas.
'Without mercy.' How could they have mercy on others, who refused to be merciful to themselves? 'Who, when they had known the justice of God.' Through this, that evil naturally displeases them, they knew the justice of God. 'They did not understand.' For if they had understood, they would have feared; if they had feared, they would never have committed such things. 'That they who do such things are worthy of death.' Of the judgment of God; even if not at present, yet they shall not escape the punishment to come. 'Not only they who do them, but they also who consent to those who do them.' They consent by receiving the doctrine, or by conniving (in another reading, by keeping company). CHAPTER II. 'Wherefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest. For wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou doest the same things which thou judgest.'
「沒有憐憫的。」那些不肯憐憫自己的人,怎能憐憫別人呢?「他們既然知道神的義。」藉著這一點,即惡本性上使他們不悅,他們便認識了神的義。「卻仍去行。」他們若明白,就必懼怕;若懼怕,就決不會犯下這樣的事。「因為行這樣事的人是該死的。」就神的審判而言,即使不在今生,他們也逃不掉將來的刑罰。「不但自己去行,就是贊同別人去行的也是如此。」他們藉著接受這教訓、或藉著默許(另一讀作:與之來往)而表示贊同。第二章。「所以你這論斷人的,無論你是誰,都無可推諉。因為你在什麼事上論斷人,就在什麼事上定自己的罪;因你這論斷人的,自己所行的卻和別人一樣。」
1:23
Omnes qui hujusmodi judicabant, maxime tamen qui habent examinandi potestatem, non solum judices. sed et domini conveniuntur. Quia naturali judicio justam factis profert unusquisquc sententiam. Omnesque norunt et innocentiam præmio, et maliliam dignam esse supplicio: et ideo inexcusabiles, quia Dei justitiam cognoverunt. Scimus enim quoniam judicium Dei est secundum veritatem in eo. qui talia agunt. Utique secundum veritatem est judicium, quo judicabuntur hujusmodi, qui condemnare alios sapuerunt, quæ per se committere non timebant. Si enim tu peccator peccatorem tui simitem judicas, quanto magis Deus justus te judicabit injustum?
All who used to judge in this manner, but especially those who have the power of examining—not only judges but also lords—are here addressed. For by natural judgment each one pronounces a just sentence upon deeds. And all men know that innocence deserves reward, and wickedness deserves punishment; and therefore they are inexcusable, because they knew the justice of God. 'For we know that the judgment of God is according to truth against them that do such things.' Assuredly the judgment by which such men shall be judged is according to truth—men who knew how to condemn others for things which they themselves did not fear to commit. For if thou, a sinner, judgest a sinner like thyself, how much more shall the just God judge thee, unjust as thou art?
凡從前如此論斷人的,尤其是那些有審查權柄的人——不僅是審判官,也包括主人——都在此被責備。因為人憑本性的判斷,各人對行為都作出公正的裁決。眾人也都知道無辜當得賞賜、惡行當受刑罰;因此他們無可推諉,因為他們認識了神的義。「我們知道這樣行的人,神必照真理審判他。」誠然,這樣的人要按真理受審判——他們懂得定別人的罪,卻不怕親自去犯同樣的事。因為你這罪人若論斷與你一樣的罪人,那公義的神豈不更要審判你這不義的人嗎?
1:24
Et ideo judicium Dei secundum veritatem est, quippe quem sine personarum acceptione nec amicis suis, nec angelis peccantibus legimus pepercisse. Humanum autem judicium multis modis corrumpitur. Nam et amore, vel odio, sed et avaritia ac timore, nonnunquam et misericordia depravatur. Existimas autem hoc, o home, qui judicas eos qui talia agunt, et facis ea, quia tu effugies judicium Dei? Nunquid propterea tibi de impunitate blandir s, quia Deus in præsent non reddit, et patientiam ejus contemnis? Non tardal, inquit, Dominus promissa, sed patienter agit propter vos, nolens aliquem perire, sed omnes ad poenilentiam converti; bonus est enim exspectando; justus est puniendo.
And therefore the judgment of God is according to truth, seeing that we read He spared neither His own friends nor the sinning angels, without respect of persons. But human judgment is corrupted in many ways. For it is depraved by love, or hatred, and also by avarice and fear, and sometimes even by mercy. 'And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them who do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?' Dost thou therefore flatter thyself with impunity, because God does not repay in the present, and dost thou despise His patience? 'The Lord,' he says, 'delayeth not His promise, but dealeth patiently for your sake, not willing that any should perish, but that all should return to penance;' for He is good in awaiting, He is just in punishing.
因此神的審判是按真理的,因為我們讀到,祂不偏待人,既不寬容自己的朋友,也不寬容犯罪的天使。但人的審判卻在許多方面被敗壞。因為它被愛、被恨、也被貪婪與懼怕所扭曲,有時甚至被憐憫所敗壞。「你這論斷行這樣事的人,自己所行的卻和別人一樣,你以為能逃脫神的審判嗎?」你豈可因神今生不施報應而自誇能免於刑罰,藐視祂的忍耐嗎?「主,」他說,「並不遲延祂的應許,乃是為你們忍耐,不願有一人沉淪,乃願人人都悔改歸正;」因為祂在等候上是良善的,在刑罰上是公義的。
1:25
An divitias bonitatis ejus. Abundantiam. Et patientiæ et longanimitatis contemnis ? ignorans quoniam benignitas Dei ad pœnitentiam te adducit? Multum se homines per patientiam Dei seducunt, quia non vult statim pun re peccantes. Putant enim eum aut non curare res humanas, aut donare quod differt. Plerique etiam calumniantur, quare in præsenti non reddit? Miseri etiam in hoc ingrati, sicut in omnibus beneficiis Dei, qui ei imputant quod eorum dissimulatur interitus, non intelligentes, quia si statim redderet, nullus jam luminum remansisset, nec ex injustis fierent jusli. Q lid plura? Paulum quoque ipsum Ecclesia non haberet.
'Or despisest thou the riches of His goodness'—the abundance—'and patience and long-suffering, being ignorant that the benignity of God leadeth thee to penance?' Men greatly deceive themselves through the patience of God, because He does not choose to punish sinners at once. For they suppose either that He does not care for human affairs, or that He forgives what He defers. Very many even bring the charge, Why does He not repay in the present? Wretched too are they, ungrateful in this as in all the benefits of God, who impute it to Him that their destruction is passed over—not understanding that, if He repaid at once, no one of the lights would now remain, nor would the just be made out of the unjust. What more? The Church would not even have Paul himself.
「還是你藐視祂豐富的恩慈」——那豐盛——「和寬容、忍耐,不曉得祂的恩慈是領你悔改嗎?」人往往因神的忍耐大大自欺,因為祂不肯立刻懲罰罪人。因為他們或以為祂不顧念人間之事,或以為祂所延緩的就是祂所赦免的。甚至有許多人埋怨說:祂為何不在今生施報?可悲的是,他們在這事上、如同在神一切恩惠上一樣忘恩負義,反倒因祂寬容他們的滅亡而歸咎於祂——他們不明白,倘若祂立刻施報,如今就沒有一盞明燈存留,不義的人也不能變為義人。何況呢?教會連保羅本人也不會擁有了。
1:26
Ideo autem hominibus videtur Deus diu exspectare peccantes, quia parvi temporis sumus, et centum annos pro infinito habemus. Ille autem apud quem mille anni tanquam una dies sunt, centum annos pro hora habet. Et ideo hoc parum est ante Dominum, cum et homines aliquantis diebus soleant exspectare pecNotes. Humanum est nempe delinquere, humanum est pro delicto poenitere. Nemo periculosius peccat quam qui peccata defendit. Secundum autem duritiam tuam, et impænitens cor thesaurizas tibi. Tu autem imprudens æger ipso remedio ad majora abuteris vulnera, sicut dicit Job: Dedit ei Deus locum pænitentiæ. et ille abutitur eo in superbiam.
For this reason God seems to men to wait a long time upon sinners: because we are of little time, and reckon a hundred years for an infinity. But He, with whom a thousand years are as one day, reckons a hundred years for an hour. And therefore this is but little before the Lord, since men too are wont to wait some days for sinners. It is human to fall short; it is human to repent for one's fault. No one sins more perilously than he who defends his sins. 'But according to thy hardness and impenitent heart thou treasurest up to thyself.' Thou, however, imprudent sick man, dost abuse the very remedy toward greater wounds, as Job says: 'God gave him a place of penance, and he abuses it unto pride.'
因此在人看來,神似乎長久等候罪人:因為我們的時日短少,把一百年當作無窮。但那位在祂看來千年如一日的神,把一百年當作一個時辰。因此在主面前這實在算不得什麼,因為連人也常會為罪人等候些日子。跌倒是人之常情;為自己的過錯悔改也是人之常情。沒有人比為自己的罪辯護的人犯罪更加危險。「你竟任著你剛硬不悔改的心,為自己積蓄。」然而你這愚昧的病人,卻濫用那醫治的藥而致更大的創傷,正如約伯所說:「神給了他悔改的機會,他卻濫用它以致驕傲。」
1:27
Non agnita enim pietas majus judicium parat, ut vindictam sentiat, qui misericordiam sentire despexit. lram in die iræ. Iram super iram ipse tibi apud Dominum recondis, quæd iebus definitis et certis lemporibusapparebit non ante diem, qui exspectaris (Sic). Et revelationis justi judicii Dei, qui reddit unicuique secundum opera ejus. Quia occultus est, etsi videlur modo per specilium in aenigmate, sive per velamen videtur. His quidem qui secundum patientiam boni operis. Boni operis merces per patientiam exspectatur: quia in praesenti vita non redditur. Per fidem enim ambulamus, et non per speciem, et tunc erit perfectum opus, si infinemusqueduraverit. Gloriam. Gloriam illam pr;p.
For piety unacknowledged prepares a greater judgment, so that he who scorned to feel mercy may feel vengeance. 'Wrath in the day of wrath.' Thou storest up wrath upon wrath for thyself with the Lord, which shall appear on days appointed and at fixed times, not before the day for which thou art awaited. 'And of the revelation of the just judgment of God, who will render to every man according to his works.' Because it is hidden, even though it is now seen through a glass in an enigma, or seen through a veil. 'To them indeed who, according to patience in good work.' The reward of good work is awaited through patience, because in the present life it is not repaid. For we walk by faith and not by sight, and then the work shall be perfect, if it endures unto the end. 'Glory.'
因為不被承認的虔敬會招致更重的審判,使那藐視領受憐憫的人得以嘗到刑罰。「在忿怒之日的忿怒。」你在主那裡為自己積蓄忿怒上加忿怒,這忿怒要在所定的日子與固定的時候顯現,而不在你所等候的那日之前。「並且顯明祂公義審判的日子,祂必照各人的行為報應各人。」因為這審判是隱藏的,雖然如今是藉著鏡子在謎語中觀看,或藉著帕子觀看。「凡恆心行善的。」善行的賞賜要藉著忍耐等候,因為在今生並不償還。因為我們行事為人是憑著信心,不是憑著眼見,並且惟有工作若持守到底,才得完全。「榮耀。」
1:28
dicat, qua sancti fulgebunt ut sol, et honorent Honarem filiorum Dei. Quid enim honoratius filiis Dei, qui etiam angelos judicabunt? Et incorruptionem. Incorruptionem, gloriam immortalitatis dicit. Quærentibus vitam æternam. Qui quaerit vitam aeternam, ista omnia consequetur, et qui habet hanc spem in eo, sanctificat se, sicut dicit: Sancti estote, sicut ille sanctus est. His autem qui ex contentione. Qui evangelicac veritati non credunt, et consentiunt iniquitali, qui relicto Creatore deserviunt creaturæ, qui contra quod sciunt defendunt, contentiosi sunt. Timete contentionem, ne quæ sequuntur patiamini. Et qui non acquiescunt veritati. Evangelicæ. Credunt autem iniquitati.
...let him say, wherewith the saints shall shine as the sun, and let them honour 'the honour of the sons of God.' For what is more honoured than the sons of God, who shall even judge the angels? 'And incorruption.' By incorruption he means the glory of immortality. 'To them that seek eternal life.' He who seeks eternal life shall obtain all these things, and he who has this hope in Him sanctifies himself, as it is said: 'Be ye holy, as He is holy.' 'But to them that are of strife.' Those who do not believe the evangelical truth, and consent to iniquity, who having forsaken the Creator serve the creature, who defend what is contrary to what they know, are contentious. Fear strife, lest ye suffer what follows. 'And who obey not the truth'—the evangelical truth. 'But believe iniquity.'
……讓他說明,義人要藉此發光如同太陽,並讓他們得享「神眾子的尊榮」。因為還有什麼比那將要審判天使的神的眾子更尊貴呢?「並不朽壞。」他所說的不朽壞乃是指不死的榮耀。「尋求永生的。」尋求永生的人必得著這一切,凡在祂裡面有這指望的,就潔淨自己,正如經上所說:「你們要聖潔,因為祂是聖潔的。」「惟有結黨的。」那些不信福音真理、卻贊同不義的人,那些離棄造物主去事奉受造之物的人,那些違背自己所知去辯護的人,都是好爭競的。你們要懼怕爭競,免得遭受隨後而來的事。「不順從真理」——即福音真理。「反順從不義。」
1:29
Quati norunt, qui credere voluerunt iniquitati: non enim æquum, derelicto Creatore omnium, creaturæ servire. Ira et indignatio. Hæc omnia peccatoribus in judicio praeparantur; tunc erit magna et infructuosa poenitentia. Tribulatio et angustia. Conscientiæ et van:p. pœnitentiæ, sicut scriptum est: Tunc dicent inter se poeniienles, et præ angustia spiritus gementes. In omnem animam hominis operantis malum, Quia anima prima peccat, ideo pœnam principaliler sentit; sive anima pro homine integro ponitur, sicut dicit quod Jacob in 70 animabui intravit in Ægyptum. Judœi primum, et Graeci. Primi, quia primo Dominum agnoverunt, et primi in legem gravius prævaricati sunt.
They knew these things who chose to believe iniquity; for it is not equitable, having forsaken the Creator of all, to serve the creature. 'Wrath and indignation.' All these things are prepared for sinners in the judgment; then there will be great and fruitless penance. 'Tribulation and anguish.' Of conscience and of vain penance, as it is written: 'Then shall the penitents say among themselves, and, groaning for anguish of spirit.' 'Upon every soul of man that worketh evil.' Because the soul sins first, therefore it chiefly feels the punishment; or the soul is put for the whole man, as it says that Jacob went down into Egypt in seventy souls. 'Of the Jew first, and of the Greek.' First, because they first knew the Lord, and were the first to transgress the law more gravely.
那些甘願相信不義的人是知道這些事的;因為離棄萬物的造物主而去事奉受造之物,是不合理的。「忿怒與惱恨。」這一切都在審判中為罪人所預備;那時必有極大而徒然的悔改。「患難與困苦。」乃是良心的患難與徒然悔改的困苦,正如經上所記:「那時悔改的人要彼此說話,並因心靈的困苦而哀嘆。」「臨到一切作惡之人。」因為靈魂先犯罪,所以主要由它承受刑罰;或者「靈魂」是用來代指整全的人,正如經上說雅各以七十個靈魂下到埃及。「先是猶太人,後是希臘人。」先是猶太人,因為他們最先認識主,也最先更嚴重地違犯律法。
1:30
Vel primum pro quidem ponit, quia et ipse dicit: Non est personarum acceptio apud Deum, sic primum tempore, non honore. Gloria autem, et honor, et pax omni operanti bonum. Gloria contra iram, bonor contra indignationem, pax contra tribulationem et angustiam, et quod superius incorruptionem, hic pacem nominavit. Judæo primum, et Græco. Quod ibi in anima dixit Judæi et Græci, hic ipsum hominem posuit. Et, sicut dictum est, primum hic pro quidem ponit, sive primum, credulitatis tempore, non honore. Non est enim personarum acceptio apud Deum.
Or he puts 'first' for 'indeed,' for he himself also says: 'There is no respect of persons with God'—thus 'first' in time, not in honour. 'But glory, and honour, and peace to every one that worketh good.' Glory against wrath, honour against indignation, peace against tribulation and anguish; and what above he called incorruption, here he named peace. 'To the Jew first, and to the Greek.' What there he said in the soul of the Jew and the Greek, here he set down the man himself. And, as has been said, here he puts 'first' for 'indeed,' or 'first' in time of belief, not in honour. 'For there is no respect of persons with God.'
或者他以「先」代替「誠然」,因為他自己也說:「神並不偏待人」——如此「先」是就時間而言,不是就尊榮而言。「但榮耀、尊貴、平安卻要加給一切行善的人。」榮耀對應忿怒,尊貴對應惱恨,平安對應患難與困苦;他在前面所稱的不朽壞,在此稱為平安。「先是猶太人,後是希臘人。」他在那裡就猶太人與希臘人的靈魂所說的,在此則指人本身。並且,如前所述,他在此以「先」代替「誠然」,或指信主時間上的「先」,而非尊榮上的「先」。「因為神並不偏待人。」
1:31
Ne gentes se de Ignorantia excusarent, quia lege naturae sunt praediti-, nec Judæi de lese et circumcisione sibi blandiantur, quia non solum professio, sed et conversatio requirenda est. Quicunque enim sine lege peccaverunt, sine lege, peribunt, et quicunque in lege peccaverunt, per legem judicabuntur. Lege litterae, et lege naturae, hoc est, mentis et conscientiae. Pejus enim videtur esse perire qnam judicari. Sed cum hoc degentibus et de Judæis loquitur, quis audeat dicere, Judæos qui in lege peccant, non esse perituros, cum in Christo non crediderint? quandoquidem sine fide Christi nemo liberari potest, ac pro hoc ita judicabuntur. fer!bunt regno, sed supplicio non peribunt.
Lest the Gentiles excuse themselves on the ground of ignorance, since they are endowed with the law of nature; nor let the Jews flatter themselves concerning the law and circumcision, because not only profession but also conduct is required. 'For whosoever have sinned without the law, shall perish without the law; and whosoever have sinned in the law, shall be judged by the law.' By the law of the letter and the law of nature, that is, of mind and conscience. For to perish seems worse than to be judged. But since he speaks both of the Gentiles and of the Jews, who would dare to say that the Jews who sin in the law shall not perish, since they have not believed in Christ? seeing that without faith in Christ no one can be delivered, and for this cause they shall be so judged. They shall be borne away from the kingdom, yet they shall not perish from punishment.
免得外邦人以無知為藉口推諉,因為他們有本性之律;也免得猶太人因律法與割禮自誇,因為所要求的不僅是宣稱,還有行為。「凡沒有律法犯了罪的,也必不按律法滅亡;凡在律法之下犯了罪的,也必按律法受審判。」乃是按字句之律與本性之律,就是心思與良心。因為滅亡似乎比受審判更為可怕。但既然他既論外邦人又論猶太人,誰敢說那些在律法之下犯罪的猶太人不會滅亡呢?既然他們沒有信基督,而人若沒有對基督的信便不能得救,因此他們要如此受審判。他們要被逐出神國,卻不在刑罰中消滅。
1:32
Quis autem dubitat, sive gentes, siveJudacos, si Christo non crediderint, perituros? Non enim auditores legis justi sunt apud Deum, sed factores legis justificabuntur. Reddit rationem quare non sint a gentibus meliores, unde i i nos timere debemus, ne audientes legem, et non facientes. cum gentibus pereamus. Nec dicat Judæus: Sub lege vixi, gentili sum melior. Lex ergo auditores facit: gratia factores. Quis enim dicat non justificatos eos qui fuerunt ex fide legi obedientes ? quando nisi justificarentur, non possunt esse obedientes. Sed dicimus lege fieri, ut Deus quid fieri velit audiatur: gratia vero fieri, ut legi obediatur, quia non auditores, sed factorcs legis justificabuntur.
But who doubts that both Gentiles and Jews, if they have not believed in Christ, shall perish? 'For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.' He gives the reason why they are not better than the Gentiles, whence we too ought to fear, lest hearing the law and not doing it, we perish together with the Gentiles. Nor let the Jew say, 'I have lived under the law, I am better than the Gentile.' The law therefore makes hearers, grace makes doers. For who would say that those were not justified who were obedient to the law out of faith? since, unless they were justified, they could not be obedient. But we say that it comes about by the law that men hear what God wills to be done; and it comes about by grace that the law is obeyed, because not the hearers but the doers of the law shall be justified.
但誰能懷疑外邦人與猶太人若沒有信基督便都要滅亡呢?「因為在神面前,不是聽律法的為義,乃是行律法的稱義。」他說明他們並不比外邦人更好的緣由,因此我們也當懼怕,免得只聽律法卻不去行,以致與外邦人一同滅亡。猶太人也不可說:「我活在律法之下,我比外邦人強。」如此,律法造就聽者,恩典造就行者。因為誰能說那些出於信而順從律法的人未曾稱義呢?既然他們若未稱義,便不能順從。但我們說,藉著律法,人得以聽見神所願行的;藉著恩典,人才得以順從律法,因為不是聽律法的,乃是行律法的稱義。
1:33
Cum enim gentes quæ legem non habent. Ne si diceretur. qui legem litteræ non habent, quomodo poterunt jndicari ? Naturaliter quæ legis sunt faciunt, ejusmodi legem non habentes. Sive dc bis dicit qui noturae legem custodiunt, qui quod sibi n lunt fieri, aliis non faciunt, sive quod naturaliter etiam gentet laudant bonos, et judicant malos, quod est opus te. gis; sive de his qui etiam nunc, dum boni aliquid operantur, a Deo accepisse se copiam qua placer6 Deo valeant, profitentur vitia puniendo. Ipsi sibi sunt lex, qui ostendunt opus legis. Ostendit illos non fuisse sine lege, ut et gentes inexcusabiles faciat, et Judæis de proprietate legis gloriam tollat.
'For when the Gentiles, who have not the law.' Lest, if it were said, they who have not the law of the letter—how shall they be able to be judged? 'Do by nature those things that are of the law, having not the law.' Either he speaks of those who keep the law of nature, who do not to others what they would not have done to themselves; or because even the Gentiles naturally praise the good and condemn the wicked, which is a work of the law; or of those who even now, while they do something good, profess that they have received from God the power whereby they may be able to please God, by punishing vices. 'These are a law to themselves,' who show the work of the law. He shows that they were not without law, both to make the Gentiles inexcusable, and to take from the Jews the glory concerning the peculiarity of the law.
「因為沒有律法的外邦人。」免得若有人說,那些沒有字句之律的人,怎能受審判呢?「若順著本性行律法上的事,這人雖沒有律法。」他或是指那些遵守本性之律的人,他們不將自己不願受的加於別人;或是因為連外邦人也本性上稱讚善人、定惡人的罪,這乃是律法的功用;或是指那些如今在行善時,承認自己已從神領受了得以討神喜悅之能力的人,藉著懲罰罪惡而如此行。「他們就是自己的律法」,因為他們顯出律法的功用。他指出他們並非沒有律法,一方面使外邦人無可推諉,一方面奪去猶太人因律法之特權而有的自誇。
1:34
Nam omnis homo de peccato in conscientia erubescit, et de bono facto lætatur. Scriptum in cordibus suis, testimonium red. dente illis conscientia. Naturae igitur legem in corda per testimonium conscientiæ, sive conscientia testatur legem se habere dum peccat, et gaudere dum pec. cata superat. Et inter se invicem cogitationum accusantium aut etiam defendentium, in die cum judicabit Deus occulta hominum.
For every man blushes in conscience for sin, and rejoices for a good deed done. 'Written in their hearts, their conscience bearing them witness.' The law of nature, therefore, in their hearts through the witness of conscience; or conscience testifies that it has the law while it sins, and that it rejoices when it overcomes sins. 'And their thoughts among themselves accusing or also defending one another, in the day when God shall judge the hidden things of men.'
因為人人都在良心中為罪羞愧,也為所行的善事歡喜。「顯明律法的功用刻在他們心裡,他們的良心也一同作證。」如此,本性之律藉良心的見證存在他們心裡;或說,良心在犯罪時見證它有律法,並在勝過罪時歡喜。「他們的思念互相較量,或以為是,或以為非,就在神藉耶穌基督審判人隱祕事的日子。」
1:35
Dicit altercationes cogitationum esse, cum quid aut faciendum, aut non faciendum, diu deliberantes dijudicamus, et secundum hoc nos in die Domini judicandos, quia bonum et malum non ignorasse probamur, sive conscientiæ nostre cogitationes erunt in die judicii ante oculos nostros tanquam historiæ agnoscendae, et haec nos aut accusabunt, aut etiam excusabunt. Secundum Evangelium meum per Jesum Christum. Secundum quod annuntio per Jcsum Christum, sive per Jesum Cbristum judicabit Deus occulta bominum. Si autem tu Judæus. Postquam allocutus est gentium partes, nunc ad Judæos convertitur, dicens, illum verum Judæum pro. bari, cuius bona magis sint occulta quam publica. Cognominaris.
He says there are disputes of thoughts, when, long deliberating whether something is to be done or not to be done, we judge; and that according to this we are to be judged in the day of the Lord, because it is proved that we were not ignorant of good and evil; or the thoughts of our conscience will be before our eyes in the day of judgment like histories to be recognised, and these will either accuse us or also excuse us. 'According to my Gospel through Jesus Christ.' According to what I announce through Jesus Christ; or through Jesus Christ God will judge the hidden things of men. 'But if thou art called a Jew.' After he has addressed the parts pertaining to the Gentiles, now he turns to the Jews, saying that he is proved a true Jew whose good things are more hidden than public. 'Art surnamed.'
他說思念的爭辯,是指當我們久久斟酌某事當行或不當行而作出判斷之時;並說我們要照此在主的日子受審判,因為這證明我們並非不知善惡;或說我們良心的思念要在審判之日呈現眼前,如同要被辨認的歷史記錄,這些要麼控告我們,要麼也為我們辯護。「照著我的福音,藉耶穌基督。」照著我藉耶穌基督所傳揚的;或說神要藉耶穌基督審判人的隱祕事。「你若稱為猶太人。」在論及與外邦人有關的部分之後,如今他轉向猶太人,說那真正的猶太人乃是那善事多隱於內而不顯於外的人。「得了稱號。」
1:36
Nomine, non opere. Et requiescis in lege. Confidis, vel securus es. Et gloriaris in Deo. Gloriaris quia notus in Judaea tantum Deus, quod solus noveris Deum, vel solus intelligas voluntatem ejus. Et nosti voluntatem ejus. Subauditur Dei, unde beati su inis, si quae Deo placent, nobis nota sint, et faciamus quae jubet. Et probas utiliora instructus per legem. Legendo vel examinando, quia per naturam, licet infirmam, utilia multa probantur, per legem utiliora, quia per gratiam perfectiora. Iterum recapitulat expositionem: Qui in lege requiescis, quomodo transgredieris legem ? Qui gloriaris in Deo, quare inhonoras Deum? Qui nosti voluntatem ejus, quare non facis eam?
In name, not in deed. 'And restest in the law.' Thou trustest, or art secure. 'And gloriest in God.' Thou gloriest that God is known in Judea only, that thou alone hast known God, or alone understandest His will. 'And knowest His will.' God's is understood; whence we are blessed, if the things that please God are known to us, and we do what He commands. 'And approvest the more useful things, being instructed by the law.' By reading or examining, because through nature, though weak, many useful things are approved; through the law, more useful; because through grace, more perfect. Again he recapitulates the exposition: Thou who restest in the law, how dost thou transgress the law? Thou who gloriest in God, why dost thou dishonour God? Thou who knowest His will, why dost thou not do it?
是名義上,不是行為上。「又倚靠律法。」你倚賴,或自以為穩妥。「且指著神誇口。」你誇口說惟獨在猶太地神為人所認識,惟獨你認識神,或惟獨你明白祂的旨意。「既從律法中受了教訓,就曉得祂的旨意。」這裡當補上「神的」旨意,因此我們是有福的,倘若討神喜悅的事為我們所知,並且我們遵行祂所命令的。「也能分別是非(更有益之事)。」藉著閱讀或考察,因為藉著本性——雖然軟弱——許多有益之事得以分辨,藉著律法可分辨更有益之事,因為藉著恩典可分辨更完全之事。他再次概括這段解釋:你這倚靠律法的,怎麼違犯律法呢?你這指著神誇口的,為何羞辱神呢?你這曉得祂旨意的,為何不去遵行呢?
1:37
Qui probas utilia, quare sectaris inutilia et vana? Dux cæcorum, quomodo viam non vides rectam? Si enim videres, per ipsam utique ambulares, lumen aliorum, quomodo non objicis opera tenebrarum i eruditor insipientium, cur etiam timorem Domini, qui est initium sapientiae, reliquisti ? Magister infantium, puer es sensu, qui habes formam scientiae et veritatis in lege, nec ipse sequeris, nec alios sequi malo exemplo permiuis. Confidis teipsum ducem esse cœcorum. Eorum utique qui viam sine luce Mei perdiderunt. Lumen eorum qui in tenebris sunt. In tenebris ignorantiae. Eruditorem insipientium. Qui Dei sapientiam non habent. Magistrum infantium. Sive aetate, sive sensu parvulorum.
Thou who approvest useful things, why dost thou pursue useless and vain things? Blind guide, how dost thou not see the straight way? For if thou didst see it, thou wouldst surely walk by it. Light of others, how dost thou not cast off the works of darkness? Instructor of the unwise, why hast thou forsaken even the fear of the Lord, which is the beginning of wisdom? Master of infants, thou art a child in sense, who hast the form of knowledge and of truth in the law, yet neither dost thou thyself follow it, nor by thy bad example dost thou permit others to follow it. 'Thou art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind.' Of those, assuredly, who have lost the way without His light. 'A light of them that are in darkness.' In the darkness of ignorance. 'An instructor of the foolish.' Who have not the wisdom of God. 'A teacher of infants.' Whether little in age or in understanding.
你這分辨有益之事的,為何追求無益虛妄之事呢?瞎子的領路人哪,你怎麼看不見正路呢?你若看得見,必定會由這路行走。別人的光哪,你怎麼不脫去暗昧的行為呢?愚昧人的教師哪,你為何連那作智慧開端的敬畏耶和華也離棄了呢?孩童的師傅哪,你在悟性上還是個孩童,你在律法上有知識與真理的模範,卻既不自己遵行,也不藉惡榜樣容別人遵行。「你深信自己是瞎子的嚮導。」誠然是那些沒有祂的光而失了道路之人的嚮導。「是黑暗中人的光。」在無知的黑暗中。「是愚昧人的教師。」是那些沒有神智慧之人的教師。「是孩童的師傅。」無論是年幼還是悟性幼稚的人。
1:38
Habentem formum scientiæ et veritatis in lege. Exemplum, quod illos p'Has sine lege vivere non posse, habes formam, ad quam st mper respiciens errare non possis. Qui ergo alium doces. Quod gentili dixit: In quo alterum judicas, teipsum condemnas. Teipaum non doce.. Quare non convenit vita tua doetrinæ luse, et opus tuum destruit fidem tuam, et ita fit ut lex non custodita non solum tibi nihil prosit, sed etiam majoris te criminis reum teneat, ut contemptorem suum. Qui prædicas non furandum, furaris. Quidam dicunt: Furaris Christum, id est, abscondis eum ab hominibus, vel sacras Scripturas, si possis, velis subtrahere. Qui dicis non mcechandum, mœcharis.
'Having the form of knowledge and of truth in the law.' An example, so that those who without the law could not live rightly, thou hast a form, ever looking to which thou canst not err. 'Thou therefore that teachest another.' What he said to the Gentile: 'Wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself.' 'Teachest not thyself.' Why does thy life not agree with thy doctrine, and thy work destroy thy faith, and so it comes about that the law, not kept, not only profits thee nothing, but even holds thee guilty of a greater crime, as its despiser? 'Thou that preachest that men should not steal, stealest.' Some say: Thou stealest Christ, that is, thou hidest Him from men; or the sacred Scriptures, if thou couldst, thou wouldst wish to withdraw. 'Thou that sayest men should not commit adultery, committest adultery.'
「你在律法上有知識和真理的模範。」這是一個範例,使那些沒有律法便不能正確生活的人,你有一個模範,時常仰望它就不致迷失。「你這教導別人的。」正如他對外邦人所說:「你在什麼事上論斷人,就在什麼事上定自己的罪。」「還不教導自己嗎?」為何你的生活與你的教訓不相符,你的行為毀壞你的信仰,以致律法既不遵守,不但於你毫無益處,反倒使你擔負更大罪責,作它的藐視者呢?「你這傳講不可偷竊的,自己還偷竊嗎?」有人說:你偷竊基督,就是把祂從人面前隱藏;或說偷竊聖經,你若能夠,就想把它奪去。「你這說不可姦淫的,自己還姦淫嗎?」
1:39
Non est una mœchatio, nam omne quod totum Deo debes, si alicui praeterquam Deo reddideris, mœcharis, sive amorem, sive timorem, sive servitium, sive obedientiam, sive spem, et ideo gravius ab illo delinquitur, a quo perfectio praedicatur. Qui abominaris idola, sacrilegiKm facis. Sacrilegium est quod proprie in Deum committitur, quasi sacri violatio, vel praevaricatio mandatorum. Qui in lege gloriatis. Dicens te beatum quod Dei noveris voluntatem. Per prœvaricationem legis Deum inhonoras. Exposuit sacrilegium, Nomen enim Dei per vos blasphematur inter gentes, sicut scriptum est. quorum malis operibus nomen Domini fuerit blasphematum, sicut scriptum est:
There is not one kind of adultery only; for everything which thou owest wholly to God, if thou renderest it to any other than God, thou committest adultery—whether love, or fear, or service, or obedience, or hope; and therefore it is more grievously sinned by him from whom perfection is preached. 'Thou that abhorrest idols, committest sacrilege.' Sacrilege is that which is properly committed against God, as it were a violation of the sacred, or a transgression of the commandments. 'Thou that gloriest in the law.' Saying that thou art blessed because thou hast known the will of God. 'Through the transgression of the law thou dishonourest God.' He has expounded the sacrilege. 'For the name of God through you is blasphemed among the Gentiles, as it is written.' Woe to those by whose evil works the name of the Lord shall have been blasphemed, as it is written:
姦淫並非只有一種;因為凡你當全然歸給神的,若你將它獻給神以外的任何對象,你就是行姦淫——無論是愛、是懼怕、是服事、是順從、還是盼望;因此那被傳講當達到完全的人,其犯罪就更為嚴重。「你這厭惡偶像的,自己還偷竊廟中之物(犯褻瀆)嗎?」褻瀆乃是那本來針對神所犯的罪,好像是對聖物的褻污,或是對誡命的違犯。「你這指著律法誇口的。」你說自己有福,因為你認識了神的旨意。「你藉著違犯律法羞辱神。」他已闡明何為褻瀆。「神的名在外邦人中因你們受了褻瀆,正如經上所記。」那些因惡行使主名受褻瀆的人有禍了,正如經上所記:」
1:40
Polluerunt nomen sanctum meum inter gentes, dum dicuntur populus Dei, qui inter gentes captivi, peccatis suis facientibus, demorantur, ut dicerent gentes, Dotninum non posse populum suum defendere, se per idola sua exstitisse victores, non intelligentes quod Israel si Dominum tenuisset, semper illis fuerat dominaturus, et per hoc defensor. Circumcisio quidem prodest, si legem observes; si autem prævaricator legis Ii., circumcisio tua prceputium facta est. Prodest tempore suo, sive quia vivere facit Judæum, et non exterminari. Potest et ita intelligi: Circumcisio prodest, quia facit intelligi esse; quia perspecta, invenitur carnis circumcisione cessante veram cordis esse venturam.
'They have polluted My holy name among the Gentiles,' while they who are called the people of God tarry as captives among the Gentiles, brought about by their own sins, so that the Gentiles would say that the Lord could not defend His own people, and that they had proved victors through their idols—not understanding that Israel, if it had held to the Lord, would always have ruled over them, and thereby been their defender. 'Circumcision indeed profiteth, if thou keep the law; but if thou be a transgressor of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.' It profits in its time, either because it makes the Jew live and not be exterminated. It can also be understood thus: Circumcision profits, because it makes one understood to be; because, when examined, the true circumcision of the heart is found to be coming when the circumcision of the flesh ceases.
「他們在外邦人中玷污了我的聖名」,因那被稱為神子民的人,因自己的罪而作了外邦人的擄物、羈留其中,以致外邦人竟說主不能保護自己的子民,倒說他們藉自己的偶像得了勝——他們不明白,以色列若持守於主,本必永遠統治他們,並藉此作他們的保護者。「你若是行律法的,割禮固然於你有益;但你若是犯律法的,你的割禮就算不得割禮。」它在合宜的時候有益,或是因為它使猶太人得以存活、不被剪除。也可如此理解:割禮有益,因為它使人被辨認出來;因為若加以審察,就發現當肉身的割禮止息時,那真正的心的割禮將要來到。
1:41
Praevaricator legis est, dum nOli sequitur quod ibi prædictum est. Signum prodest, si res adsit, cæterum signum sine re superfluum erit. Nam et signum quod Cain accepit, hoc significavit quod Judæos circumcisio discerneret a reliquis. Et sicut ille vagus et profugus cum ipso signo usque ad mortem duravit, sic Judaei usque in finem cum ipso circumcisionis jam inani signo per orbem dispersi, pleni zelo et pavore discurrunt, et nullus eis aufert circumcisionem, sive sub paganis, sive sub Christianis principibus ipsum signum portant Christi homicidæ, sicut Cain fratricida portavit. Si igitur præputium justitias legis custodiat.
He is a transgressor of the law while he does not follow what was there foretold. A sign profits, if the reality is present; otherwise a sign without the reality will be superfluous. For even the sign which Cain received signified this, that circumcision distinguished the Jews from the rest. And as he, a wanderer and a fugitive, endured with that very sign unto death, so the Jews unto the end, with the now empty sign of circumcision, scattered throughout the world, run about full of zeal and dread, and no one takes their circumcision from them; whether under pagan or under Christian princes, they bear that very sign, the murderers of Christ, as Cain the fratricide bore it. 'If therefore the uncircumcision keep the justices of the law.'
當他不遵行那裡所預言的,他就是犯律法的人。記號若有其所指的實體同在便有益;不然,沒有實體的記號便是多餘的。因為連該隱所受的記號也表明這事,即割禮把猶太人與其餘的人分別出來。正如他這流離飄蕩的逃亡者帶著那記號直到死亡,猶太人也照樣直到末了,帶著如今空洞的割禮記號,分散在全世界,滿懷熱心與恐懼四處奔走,沒有人奪去他們的割禮;無論在異教君王之下還是在基督徒君王之下,他們都帶著那記號,作殺害基督的兇手,正如殺弟的該隱帶著那記號。「所以那未受割禮的,若遵守律法的義。」
1:42
Visibilia indigent invisibilibus, invisibilia non indigent visibilibus, eo quod visibilia imagines sint invisibilium. Circumcisio carnis indiget cordis circumcisione, circumcisio autem cordis non indiget carnis circumcisione, quia imagine non indiget veritas, imago vero indiget veritate. Quare ergo data est circumcisio, si sola non prodest? Primum, ut cognosceretur Dei populus inter gentes vel in bello. Quod autem tali membro signamur, primum haec causa est, ne aliud membrum deturparetur, quod aspectu horreret;
Visible things need invisible things; invisible things do not need visible things, in that visible things are images of invisible things. The circumcision of the flesh needs the circumcision of the heart; but the circumcision of the heart does not need the circumcision of the flesh, because the truth needs not the image, but the image needs the truth. Why then was circumcision given, if by itself it does not profit? First, that the people of God might be recognised among the Gentiles or in war. And that we are marked in such a member—first this is the cause, lest another member should be disfigured, which would be horrid to look upon;
可見之物需要不可見之物;不可見之物卻不需要可見之物,因為可見之物乃是不可見之物的形像。肉身的割禮需要心的割禮;但心的割禮卻不需要肉身的割禮,因為真理不需要形像,形像卻需要真理。既然割禮本身無益,那麼為何要賜下割禮呢?首先,是為使神的子民在外邦人中或在爭戰中得以被認出。至於我們何以在那樣一個肢體上受記號——首先的緣由,乃是免得另一個肢體受損毀,以致看上去令人厭惡;
1:43
deinde propter gratiæ promissionem, in qua erat per castitatem placendum, sive ut Christus significaretur ex circumcisione venturus, usque ad quem futura erat carnalis circumcisio, cuius typum gerens Jesus filius Nave secundo circumciderejubetur filios Israel. Sed hoc figura fuit, in tantum ut diceretur: In novissimis diebus circumcidet Deus cor tuum.. Et: Circumcidite præputia cordis vestri. Et ut originale peccatum in eo membro ubi insertum iuerat, etiam legis tempore puniretur. Nonne præputium illius in circumcisionem reputabitur? et judicabit quod ex natura est. Quia habet justitiam, cujus signum est circumcisio. Præputium legem consummaM. Implens.
then because of the promise of grace, in which one was to please through chastity; or that Christ might be signified as about to come from the circumcision, up to whom the carnal circumcision was to endure, whose type Jesus the son of Nave (Nun) bore, being commanded to circumcise the sons of Israel a second time. But this was a figure, so much so that it was said: 'In the last days God will circumcise thy heart.' And: 'Circumcise the foreskins of your heart.' And that original sin might be punished, even in the time of the law, in that member wherein it had been implanted. 'Shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? and shall judge that which by nature is.' Because it has the justice whose sign is circumcision. 'The uncircumcision fulfilling the law.' Fulfilling.
其次,是因著恩典的應許,在其中人當藉貞潔討神喜悅;或是為叫基督被表明將要從受割禮者中而來,肉身的割禮要存留直到祂,嫩的兒子約書亞(Nave)便背負了這預表,蒙命第二次為以色列人行割禮。但這乃是預表,以致有話說:「在末後的日子,神必為你的心行割禮。」又說:「你們要為自己的心行割禮。」並且叫原罪即使在律法時代,也在它所植入的那肢體上受懲罰。「他那未受割禮的,豈不算是割禮嗎?並且要審判那本性上……的人。」因為他有那以割禮為記號的義。「那未受割禮而成全律法的。」即成就律法。
1:44
Te qui per litteram et circumcisionem prævaricator legis es? Dum litterae circumcisionem sectaris, spiritus accipere non mereris. Non enim qui in manifesto Judæus est. Omnia quae ante circa exteriorem hominem gerebantur, figuram exterioris hominis praeferebant. Neque quæ in manifesto in carne circumcisio, sed qui in abscondito Judæus est. Ipse verus Judæus est. Et circumcisio cordis in spiritu. De qua scriptum est in lege: In novissimis diebus circumcidet Deus cor tuum, et cor seminis tui. In spiritu, inquit, id est secundum novum testamentum, quod interiora quaerit, quae solus videat Deus, et haec est vera circumcisio. Non littera, cujus laus, non ex hominibus, sed ex Deo est.
'Thee who by the letter and circumcision art a transgressor of the law?' While thou followest the circumcision of the letter, thou dost not deserve to receive the spirit. 'For it is not he that is a Jew in the manifest.' All things which formerly were done concerning the outer man bore the figure of the outer man. 'Neither is that circumcision which is in the manifest, in the flesh; but he that is a Jew in secret.' He is the true Jew. 'And the circumcision of the heart in the spirit.' Of which it is written in the law: 'In the last days God will circumcise thy heart, and the heart of thy seed.' 'In the spirit,' he says, that is, according to the new testament, which seeks the inner things, which God alone may see; and this is the true circumcision. 'Not in the letter, whose praise is not of men, but of God.'
「你這憑字句與割禮而作犯律法者的人?」當你追隨字句的割禮時,你就不配領受聖靈。「因為外面作猶太人的,不是真猶太人。」凡從前圍繞外在之人所行的一切,都帶著外在之人的形像。「外面肉身的割禮,也不是真割禮;惟有在裡面隱藏處作猶太人的。」他才是真猶太人。「心裡受割禮,在乎靈。」關於這割禮,律法中有話寫著:「在末後的日子,神必為你的心與你後裔的心行割禮。」「在乎靈,」他說,即照著新約,新約尋求內在之事,惟有神能看見;這才是真割禮。「不在乎字句,這人的稱讚不是從人來的,乃是從神來的。」
1:45
Littera occidit, spiritus autem vivificat. Lex litteræ non est data justis, sed injustis, et ideo laudem hominum merebatur. Lex autem Christi jam non minatur gladium peccantibus, sed promittit praemium libere servientibus, et ideo laudem a Deo habet, qui solus videt cor, quia ex fide precatur. CAP. III. Quid ergo amplius est Judæo ? aut quiB utilitas circumcisionis ? Reddit rationem quod lex inanis non fuerit, sed quod carnalis circumcisionis praerogativa vana sit, nullis operibus fulta. Interrogat, Quid amplius habeat Judæus. Respondet sive ex se, sive ex persona Judæorum, Multum per omnem modum, Nam si ipsius est sensus, Multum per omnem modum;
The letter killeth, but the spirit quickeneth. The law of the letter was not given for the just, but for the unjust, and therefore it deserved the praise of men. But the law of Christ no longer threatens the sword to sinners, but promises a reward to those who serve freely, and therefore it has praise from God, who alone sees the heart, because it prays out of faith. CHAPTER III. 'What advantage then hath the Jew? or what is the profit of circumcision?' He gives the reason that the law was not empty, but that the prerogative of carnal circumcision is vain, being supported by no works. He asks, What advantage the Jew has. He answers, whether of himself or in the person of the Jews: 'Much every way.' For if it is his own sense, 'Much every way';
字句是叫人死,靈是叫人活。字句的律法不是為義人設立的,乃是為不義的人設立的,因此它配得人的稱讚。但基督的律法不再以刀劍威嚇罪人,乃是應許賞賜給那些甘心服事的人,因此它得著神的稱讚,惟有神能看見人心,因為它出於信心而祈求。第三章。「這樣說來,猶太人有什麼長處呢?割禮有什麼益處呢?」他說明律法並非徒然,但肉身割禮的特權若無善行支持便是虛空的。他問道:猶太人有什麼長處。他回答說,或是出於他自己,或是以猶太人的身分:「凡事大有長處。」因為若這是他本人的意思,「凡事大有長處」;
1:46
et, Omnis homo mendax, quomodo postea convenit dicens:Si autem iniquitasnostra, et caetera. Postremo, quomodo negat præcellere Judæos multum per omnem modum? Multa illa utilitas erit, si eloquia, quae meruit accipere, studeatcustodire. Primum quidem, quia credita sunt illis eloquia Dei. Quod genlibus nulla. Quid enim si quidam illorum non crediderunl? Nunquid incredulilas illorum fidem Dei evacuavit? Absit. Nec enim credentibus præjudicat incredulitas transgressorum, et promissio Dei, quae ad Abraham facta est, si circa prævaricatores evacuatur, circa obedientes impletur, quia mentiri veritas nescit, sicut scriptum est: Est autem Deus verax, omnis vero homo mendax.
and, 'Every man a liar'—how does it afterward agree when he says: 'But if our iniquity,' and the rest? Finally, how does he deny that the Jews excel much every way? Great will be that profit, if they be zealous to keep the oracles which they merited to receive. 'First indeed, because the oracles of God were committed to them.' Which to the Gentiles were none. 'For what if some of them have not believed? Shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? God forbid.' For the unbelief of transgressors does not prejudice believers, and the promise of God which was made to Abraham, if it is made void concerning the transgressors, is fulfilled concerning the obedient, because truth knows not how to lie, as it is written: 'But God is true, and every man a liar.'
而「人人都是說謊的」——當他後來說「但我們的不義」等語時,這怎能相合呢?末了,他怎能否認猶太人凡事大有長處呢?那長處必是極大的,倘若他們熱心持守他們所配領受的神諭。「第一,是神的聖言交託他們。」這是外邦人所沒有的。「即便有不信的,這有何妨呢?難道他們的不信就廢掉神的信實嗎?斷乎不能。」因為違犯者的不信絲毫不損信者,神向亞伯拉罕所立的應許,即便就違犯者而言歸於虛空,就順從者而言仍得成就,因為真理不知如何說謊,正如經上所記:「神是真實的,人都是虛謊的。」
1:47
Quia nemo sine peccato, præter illum solum qui nec nascendo habuit, nec vivendo contraxit. Ideo solus verax, implens quæ promisit quia in semine ejus benedicendae essent gentes, et benedicunlur in Christo, et per Christum, quia in ipso per ejus gratiam crediderunt; nam et si incredulis Judæis evacuata est.in eis, qui de populo ipso dono Domini crediderunt, et impleta est, et usque in finem quotidie plenius adimpletur, quia verax est qui promisit, et fallere nullatenus potest. Est autem Deus verax, omnis autem homo mendax: iicut scriptum est. Ut justus proberis, cum in peccatoribus vindicas: Ut justificeris in sermonibus tuis, et vincas cum judicaris.
Because no one is without sin, except Him alone who neither had it by being born, nor contracted it by living. Therefore He alone is true, fulfilling what He promised, because in His seed the Gentiles were to be blessed, and they are blessed in Christ and through Christ, because in Him, through His grace, they believed; for even if it was made void in the unbelieving Jews, in those of that very people who by the gift of the Lord believed, it was both fulfilled, and unto the end is daily fulfilled more fully, because He who promised is true, and can in no way deceive. 'But God is true, and every man a liar: as it is written.' 'That thou mayest be justified when thou avengest upon sinners: That thou mayest be justified in thy words, and mayest overcome when thou art judged.'
因為除了那位——祂出生時未曾有罪,活著時也未曾沾染罪——沒有人是無罪的。因此惟有祂是真實的,成就了祂所應許的,因為外邦人要在祂的後裔裡蒙福,他們也在基督裡並藉著基督蒙福,因為他們在祂裡面藉著祂的恩典相信了;因為即便這應許在不信的猶太人身上歸於虛空,在那子民中蒙主恩賜而相信的人身上卻既得成就,且直到末了日日更充分地成就,因為那應許的是真實的,斷不能欺哄。「神是真實的,人都是虛謊的:正如經上所記。」「好在你責罰罪人時,顯為公義:好在你的言語上顯為公義,你被審判的時候,可以得勝。」
1:48
Vincis cum judicaris, cum mihi peccata mea, me confitente et damnante, dimittis. Ut justificeris, inquit, in sermonibus tuis, est enim Deus verax; nam etsi vacuata est apostolatus benedictio in traditore Juda, sed in Petro, qui fidem conservavit, impleta est. Evacuata est promissio in populo, qui propter transgressiones periit in deserto; impleta est in eis qui in terram sanctam dono Domini, fide cooperante, perducti sunt. Adjicit etiam de psalmo L testimonium: Ut justificeris, inquit, in sermonibus tuis, et vincas cum judicaris. In psalmi ordine et locutio prophetae ita se habet:
'Thou overcomest when Thou art judged,' when Thou remittest me my sins, I confessing and condemning them. 'That Thou mayest be justified,' he says, 'in Thy words,' for God is true; for even if the blessing of the apostolate was made void in Judas the traitor, yet in Peter, who kept the faith, it was fulfilled. The promise was made void in the people who perished in the desert because of transgressions; it was fulfilled in those who by the gift of the Lord, faith cooperating, were led into the holy land. He also adds a testimony from Psalm 50 (51): 'That Thou mayest be justified,' he says, 'in Thy words, and mayest overcome when Thou art judged.' In the order of the psalm the utterance of the prophet stands thus:
「你被審判的時候,可以得勝,」就是當我認罪自責時,你赦免我的罪。「好叫你,」他說,「在你的言語上顯為公義,」因為神是真實的;因為使徒職分的祝福即便在賣主的猶大身上歸於虛空,在持守信心的彼得身上卻得了成就。應許在那些因違犯而喪命曠野的百姓身上歸於虛空;在那些蒙主恩賜、藉信心配合而被領入聖地的人身上卻得了成就。他又從詩篇第五十(五十一)篇加上一個見證:「好叫你,」他說,「在你的言語上顯為公義,你被審判的時候,可以得勝。」在詩篇的次序中,先知的話是這樣的:」
1:49
0 Domine, pronuntiasti quidem sine personarum acceptione te in peccalores vindicaturum, et quidem nunc dum mihi remittis, patientiam tuam mendacium judicanl, sed vincis cum judicaris, dum mihi peccata, me confitente et damnante, dimittis, quia non judieas bis in idipsum. Id est, dum homo ipse sui judex culpam in se lamentatione et contritione persequitur, injusta esse pietatis tuæ indulgentia non probatur. Dum me immanis commissi reum arguis per prophetam, probas te habere de nostris operibus curam, et vincis eos qui te incuriosum humanorum acuum judicabaut.
'O Lord, Thou hast indeed declared, without respect of persons, that Thou wouldst take vengeance upon sinners; and indeed now, while Thou remittest to me, they judge Thy patience to be a lie; but Thou overcomest when Thou art judged, while Thou remittest me my sins, I confessing and condemning them, because Thou dost not judge twice for the same thing.' That is, while the man himself, his own judge, prosecutes his fault in himself with lamentation and contrition, the indulgence of Thy piety is not proved to be unjust. While Thou provest me guilty of a monstrous deed through the prophet, Thou provest that Thou hast care for our works, and Thou overcomest those who judged Thee careless of human deeds.
「主啊,你確曾宣告,你必不偏待人地向罪人施報;如今當你赦免我時,他們竟判定你的忍耐為虛謊;但你被審判的時候卻得勝,就是當我認罪自責時,你赦免我的罪,因為你不會為同一件事審判兩次。」這就是說,當人自己作自己的審判官,以哀哭與痛悔在自身中追究己過時,你憐憫的寬宥就不被證為不義。當你藉先知證明我犯了滔天之罪時,你便證明你顧念我們的行為,並勝過那些論斷你不顧人間作為的人。
1:50
Ideo de isto sensu Apostoli totam expositionem cujusdam sancti viri posui, ut plenius lectoris sollicitudo imbueretur, et ubicunque sic invenis, paginas plenas, pro instructione hoc posui. Ul justificeris, inquit, in sermonibus tuis, et vincas cum judicaris. Videamus quomodo sibi hoc loco Apostoli sermo consentiat cum testimonio quod ex propheta, sermonem suum confirmaturus, assumpsit. Sententiam hanc evidenter illo sensu Apostolus ponit, quo dudum David sub pœnitentiæ voce protulerat, dicens: 0 Domine, de semine meo esse venturum Salvatorem humani generis promisisti:
Therefore concerning this sense of the Apostle I have set down the whole exposition of a certain holy man, that the reader's attention might be more fully imbued; and wherever thou findest full pages thus, I have set this down for instruction. 'That Thou mayest be justified,' he says, 'in Thy words, and mayest overcome when Thou art judged.' Let us see how in this place the Apostle's discourse agrees with the testimony which he took up from the prophet, in order to confirm his own discourse. The Apostle evidently sets down this sentence in that sense in which David of old had uttered it under the voice of penance, saying: 'O Lord, Thou hast promised that the Saviour of the human race should come from my seed:'
因此關於使徒這段的意思,我引錄了某位聖人的全部解釋,好使讀者的用心得以更充分地受薰陶;凡你如此見到滿篇的地方,我都是為著教導而引錄的。「好叫你,」他說,「在你的言語上顯為公義,你被審判的時候,可以得勝。」讓我們來看,使徒在此處的話語如何與他為堅固己說而從先知引用的見證相合。使徒顯然是照著大衛從前以悔改之聲所發的那意思,寫下這句話,說:「主啊,你曾應許,人類的救主要從我的後裔而出:」
1:51
nunc dum me videt populus tuus duplici crimine vulneratum, blasphemare feci filios Israel, ut, dum in adulterio et homicidio perspiciunt reatum meum, te putent esse mentitum, et ideo precem satisfactionis agnosce, et tu remitte quod ipse condemno, ut cum me indulta propitiatione reparaveris, et dignum promissione tua feceris, in sermooibus tuis justus appareas, et vincas cum a reprehensoribus judicaris, et ita nunc hanc lineam Apostolus sequitur dicens: Licet transgressores Judæi fecerint nomen Domini blasphemari, quo dicatur: Hæc erat illa gens sancta et populus electus, qui se nunc transgressione et inexpiabili sacrilegio et crimine impietatis involvit;
'now, while Thy people sees me wounded by a twofold crime, I have caused the sons of Israel to blaspheme, so that, while they behold my guilt in adultery and murder, they may think Thee to have lied; and therefore acknowledge the prayer of satisfaction, and do Thou remit what I myself condemn, so that when Thou hast restored me by granting propitiation, and hast made me worthy of Thy promise, Thou mayest appear just in Thy words, and mayest overcome when Thou art judged by reproachers.' And so now the Apostle follows this line, saying: 'Although the transgressing Jews have caused the name of the Lord to be blasphemed, so that it is said: This was that holy nation and chosen people, who now involves itself in transgression and inexpiable sacrilege and the crime of impiety;'
「如今當你的百姓看見我受了雙重罪的創傷時,我使以色列人褻瀆了,以致當他們看見我在姦淫與兇殺上的罪責時,便以為你說了謊;因此求你悅納我認罪懺悔的祈求,你就赦免我自己所定罪的,好使當你藉施恩憐憫使我復原、使我配得你的應許之後,你在你的言語上顯為公義,你被責備者審判的時候可以得勝。」如此,使徒如今便循此思路說:「違犯律法的猶太人雖使主名受褻瀆,以致有人說:這曾是那聖潔的邦國與蒙揀選的子民,如今卻自陷於違犯、不可赦的褻瀆與不虔之罪中;」
1:52
ecce per scelus pravaricatorum Dei promissa vacuata sunt. Sed non ita est, nam si transgressores a gratia exciderunt, veridicam Domini sponsionem obedientia fidelium consequitur, ac sic confusis illis qui eloquia divina in irritum adducta jactabant, justificatur Dominus in sermonibus suis, et vincit cum judicatur, dum gratiam ab incredulis repudiatam credentibus confert. Quod vero dicit: Est autem Deus verax, omnis autem homo mendax, et iterum: Si autem iniquitas nostra justitiam Dei commendat, infideles utrumque hoc testimonium in rationabili sensu accipiant. Si autem iniquitas nostra justitiam Dei commendat, quid dicemus t Nunquid iniquus Deus, qui infert iram?
behold, through the wickedness of the transgressors the promises of God have been made void. But it is not so; for if the transgressors have fallen from grace, the obedience of the faithful obtains the Lord's truthful pledge; and thus, those being confounded who boasted that the divine oracles had been brought to nought, the Lord is justified in His words, and overcomes when He is judged, while He confers upon believers the grace repudiated by unbelievers. But as to what he says: 'God is true, and every man a liar,' and again: 'But if our iniquity commend the justice of God,' let the unbelievers receive both this testimony in a reasonable sense. 'But if our iniquity commend the justice of God, what shall we say? Is God unjust, who executeth wrath?'
看哪,藉著違犯者的惡行,神的應許已歸於虛空。但事實並非如此;因為若違犯者從恩典中墜落,信者的順從卻使主真實的應許得以成就;如此,那些誇稱神的聖言已歸徒然的人便蒙羞,主便在祂的言語上顯為公義,並在祂被審判時得勝,就是當祂把不信者所拒絕的恩典賜給信者之時。但關於他所說的:「神是真實的,人都是虛謊的」,以及又說的:「若我們的不義顯出神的義來」,願不信者以合理的意思領受這兩處見證。「若我們的不義顯出神的義來,我們可以怎麼說呢?神降怒,是祂不義嗎?」
1:53
Si autem iniquitas nostra justitiam Dei commendat, iniquum est, inquit, si in illos vindicat, qui ideo peccavcrunt ut justior appareret: qua enim justitia damnabit injustitiam, si secundum te humana iniquitate fit justior ? Hoc loco magistro gentium disserente, duarum ratio vertitur personarum, id est, sub imperitia male interpretanlis, et sub doctrina Apostoli refellenlis, et tanquam si Apostolo pars diversa imprudenter credens ita diccret:
'But if our iniquity commend the justice of God,' it is unjust, he says, if He takes vengeance upon those who sinned for this very end, that He might appear more just; for by what justice will He condemn injustice, if, according to thee, He is made more just by human iniquity? In this place, while the teacher of the Gentiles discourses, the case of two persons is turned about, that is, under the ignorance of one interpreting badly, and under the teaching of the Apostle refuting him; and as if to the Apostle a contrary party, imprudently believing, were thus to say:
「若我們的不義顯出神的義來」,他說,倘若祂向那些正是為叫祂顯得更公義而犯罪的人施報,這便是不義;因為若照你所說,祂因人的不義而變得更公義,那祂憑什麼公義去定不義的罪呢?在此處,當外邦人的教師論述時,兩個人的立場被交替陳明,即一方是曲解者的無知,另一方是使徒駁斥的教導;彷彿有一持相反意見、輕率相信的人向使徒這樣說:」
1:54
0 Apostole, magnum peccatis nostris solatium contulisti, dicendo quod justificetur Deus in nostrorum indulgentia delictorum, et quia veritatem Dei mendacia nostra commendant, et peccata nostra misericordiæ materiam Deo ingerunt, ut per iniquitates nostras ejus bonitas exerceatur et gloria dilatelur, iujuste peccata nostra pupiuntur, quae ad manifestandam Dei patientiam benevolentiamque proficiunt, statim infert. Hucusque objectio* adversa, hic respondet Apostolus illorum sensui: Iniquus est, inquit, Deus, si in illos vindicat per quorum peccata benignus apparet, et non debeo judicari, qui mentior, quia meo mendacio Dei veritas collecta praedicabilior invenitur.
'O Apostle, thou hast conferred great solace upon our sins, by saying that God is justified in the pardon of our transgressions, and that our lies commend the truth of God, and our sins furnish God with matter for mercy, so that through our iniquities His goodness is exercised and His glory enlarged—unjustly are our sins punished, which avail to manifest the patience and benevolence of God.' At once he brings it forward. Thus far the adverse objection; here the Apostle answers their sense: God is unjust, he says, if He takes vengeance upon those through whose sins He appears benign, and I ought not to be judged, who lie, because by my lie the truth of God, gathered together, is found the more worthy to be preached.
「使徒啊,你藉著說神在赦免我們的過犯上顯為公義、我們的虛謊顯出神的真實、我們的罪為神提供施憐憫的材料,以致藉我們的不義使祂的良善得以施展、祂的榮耀得以擴展,這樣,你便大大安慰了我們的罪——如此,那些有助於彰顯神忍耐與慈愛的罪,若受懲罰便是不義的。」他隨即提出這話。以上是反面的詰難;於此使徒回答他們的意思:他說,神若向那些藉其罪而使祂顯為慈愛的人施報,便是不義的,而我這說謊的人也不當受審判,因為藉我的謊言,神的真理匯集起來,反被發現更配得傳揚。
1:55
Et ideo quanto majora mala fecerimus, tanto majora bona ab illo pro cujus laude peccavimus, recipiemus. Hoc fortassis ideo imprudentes ita intelligi debere arbitrabantur, quia legimus: Ubi abundavit peccatum, superabundavit gratia, quasi quæ peccati det meritum, dum clemenliae Dei praestet augmentum. Sed longe aliter intelligenda est ista sententia. Et quod ita per satisfactionem et emendationem consumpta sit abundantia peccatorum, ut emendati non solum veniam, sed etiam præmia mererentur: ut justificeris, inquit, in sermonibus tuis. Hoc testimonium pars adversa ita proposuit quasi dixerit David: Propterea ego peccavi, ut dum me judicas, tu justus appareas, aut misericors, dum remittes;
'And therefore the greater the evils we shall have done, the greater the goods we shall receive from Him for whose praise we have sinned.' Perhaps the imprudent thought that it ought to be understood thus, because we read: 'Where sin abounded, grace did more abound,' as though the thing that gives the merit of sin, while it furnishes the increase of God's clemency. But this sentence is to be understood far otherwise. And that the abundance of sins was so consumed by satisfaction and amendment, that the amended deserved not only pardon but even rewards: 'that Thou mayest be justified,' he says, 'in Thy words.' This testimony the adverse party propounded as though David had said: 'For this reason I sinned, that while Thou judgest me, Thou mightest appear just, or merciful while Thou remittest;'
「因此,我們所行的惡越大,就越發從那位——我們為祂的稱讚而犯罪——領受更大的善。」或許那些不明事理的人以為當如此理解,因為我們讀到:「罪在哪裡顯多,恩典就更顯多了」,好像那使罪得功勞的事,同時卻增添神的憐憫。但這句話當有截然不同的理解。並且罪的豐多藉著懺悔與改正被如此消除,以致改過者不僅配得赦免,甚至配得賞賜:「好叫你,」他說,「在你的言語上顯為公義。」反面之人如此提出這見證,彷彿大衛曾說:「我犯罪正是為此,好使當你審判我時,你顯為公義,或當你赦免時,你顯為憐憫;」
1:56
et ideo parcere mihi debes, quia iniquitas mea, aut misericordiam tuam, aut justitiam commendat. Hinc eorum errorem Apostolus retractat, et interjectis sententiis destruit dicens: Si, quemadmodum aiunt nos quidam dicere, iniquilas nostra justitiam Dei commendat, ergo iniquus est Deus, qui infert iram, cum iniquitas nostra ejus prædicet misericordiam. Secundum hominem dico. Absit. Id est secundum carnalem sensum tuum, vel secundum te, qui de supcnon sententia tam imperite sentis et tam imprudenter intelligis. Qua enim justitia damnabit injustitiam, ai juxta opinionem tuam humana iniquitate sit justior? Sed non ita est.
'and therefore Thou oughtest to spare me, because my iniquity commends either Thy mercy or Thy justice.' Hence the Apostle rebuts their error, and by interposed sentences he destroys it, saying: 'If, as some report that we say, our iniquity commend the justice of God, then God is unjust, who executeth wrath'—since our iniquity proclaims His mercy. 'I speak according to man. God forbid.' That is, according to thy carnal sense, or according to thee, who from the sentence above judgest so unskilfully and understandest so imprudently. For by what justice will He condemn injustice, if, according to thy opinion, He is made more just by human iniquity? But it is not so.
「因此你當寬容我,因為我的不義顯出你的憐憫或你的公義來。」於是使徒駁斥他們的錯誤,並藉插入的話語予以拆毀,說:「若照有人所傳說我們所講的,我們的不義顯出神的義來,那麼神降怒便是不義的」——既然我們的不義宣揚祂的憐憫。「我且照著人的常話說。斷乎不是。」就是說,照著你肉體的意念,或照著你這從上文如此拙劣判斷、如此輕率理解的人。因為若照你的見解,祂因人的不義而變得更公義,那祂憑什麼公義去定不義的罪呢?但事實並非如此。
1:57
Nam Deum nostrum non tam peccata quam bonorum operum gesta glorificant, et ideo in puniendis peccatis justus agnoscitur, qui sanctis operibus delectatur. Alioquin quomodo judicabit Dem nunc munuum, si non bonis bona, et malis mala retribuit, ut justis præmium pro justitia, et peccatoribus quOd merentur tribuit? Si enim verita. Dei in meo mendaci. abundavit in gloriam ipsius, quid? Id est, utquid judicor quasi malefaciens ? et non sient quidam nos dicunt dicere, ut quanto majora mala fecerimus, tanto ampliora bona recipiamuS. Adhuc. Insuper. Et ego tanquam peccator. Homo qui mentior. Judicor. A Deo in die judicii. Iste est sensus, tanquam si diceret:
For not so much our sins as the deeds of good works glorify our God, and therefore in punishing sins He is acknowledged just, He who delights in holy works. Otherwise how shall God now judge the world, if He does not repay good things to the good and evil things to the evil, so as to render to the just the reward for justice, and to sinners what they deserve? 'For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto His glory'—what? That is, why am I also judged as a doer of evil? and not, as some report that we say, that the greater the evils we shall have done, the more ample the goods we shall receive. 'Yet.' Moreover. 'And I as a sinner'—a man who lies. 'Am judged'—by God in the day of judgment. This is the sense, as though he should say:
因為榮耀我們神的,與其說是我們的罪,不如說是善工的作為,因此在懲罰罪惡上,祂被認為是公義的,因為祂喜悅聖潔的善工。不然,神如今怎能審判世界呢?若祂不將善報給善人、惡報給惡人,以致將公義的賞賜給義人、將所當得的給罪人?「若神的真理,因我的虛謊越發顯多,以致榮耀歸與祂」——那又如何呢?就是說,為何我還被當作作惡的受審判呢?而不是像有人所傳說我們所講的,即我們所行的惡越大,所領受的善就越豐盛。「還是。」而且。「我這罪人」——一個說謊的人。「還受審判」——在審判之日被神審判。這就是那意思,彷彿他要說:」
1:58
0 infidelis, ex verbis meis peccatorum tuorum asSeris defensionem, dicendo quod justitiam Dei iniquitas nostra commendet, et veritas ejus ex nostris mendaciis crescat, et imbecillitati nostræ comparata, magis magisque major appareat. Sed dum ita malis tuis inimica severitate blandiris, justa damnatione puniendUs es ab illo qui secundum uniuscujuscunque opera judicabit mundum. Unde hic locus ideo difficilior videtur, quia ab imperitis diversæ partis quaestionibus obscuratur, sicut alio loco Apostolus irrationabilia objecta proponit et respuit: Quid enim dicimus, permanebimus in peccato, ut gratia abundet ? Absit. Et paulo post: Quid ergo? peccabimus, quia non sumus sub lege, sed sub gratia?
'O unbeliever, from my words thou assertest a defence of thy sins, by saying that our iniquity commends the justice of God, and that His truth grows out of our lies, and, compared to our weakness, appears greater and greater. But while thou thus flatterest thy evils with a hostile severity, thou art to be punished with just condemnation by Him who will judge the world according to the works of each and every one.' Whence this passage seems the more difficult, because it is obscured by the questions of the unskilled of the adverse party; just as in another place the Apostle propounds irrational objections and rejects them: 'For what shall we say? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid.' And a little after: 'What then? Shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace?'
「不信的人哪,你從我的話中為你的罪主張辯護,說我們的不義顯出神的義來、祂的真實從我們的虛謊中滋長,並與我們的軟弱相比顯得越來越大。但當你以敵對的嚴厲如此袒護你的惡行時,你必被那位要照各人行為審判世界的神以公義的定罪來懲罰。」因此這段話似乎更為艱深,因為它被反對一方無知者的問題所蒙蔽;正如在另一處使徒也提出不合理的詰難並加以駁斥:「這樣,怎麼說呢?我們可以仍在罪中,叫恩典顯多嗎?斷乎不可。」稍後又說:「這卻怎麼樣呢?我們不在律法之下,乃在恩典之下,就可以犯罪嗎?」
1:59
Absit. Ad extremum Apostolus sensu veritatis evacuans quæstionem ita dicit: Et non sicut blasphemamur, et sicut aiunt quidam nos dicere: Faciamus mala, ut eveniant bona. Et hæc stulterum objectio est, quam subjungens destruit dicens: Quorum damnatio justa est. Quid enim justius quam ut aliquis pœnam peccati sui sentiat ? quam nos negare mentiti sunt, qui nihil magis quam justum Dei jndicium prædicamus. Quid igitur? prœcellimus eos? Nos Judæi, id est nullam unde alterutra pars præcellat causam invenio, quia omnes sub peccato esse judicamus, hoc enim ipsa ratio deprehendit, sub peccato esse Judæos et gentes, ut etiam psalmi testimonio comprobatur. Nequaquam. Ipse respondit sibi.
By no means. Finally, the Apostle, doing away with the objection by the perception of the truth, speaks thus: 'And not, as we are slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say, Let us do evil that good may come.' And this is a foolish objection, which, appending it, he demolishes, saying: 'Whose condemnation is just.' For what is more just than that a man should feel the punishment of his own sin? — which they lyingly said we deny, we who preach nothing more than the just judgment of God. 'What then? are we better than they?' We Jews, that is: I find no cause whereby either side should be superior, since we judge all to be under sin; for reason itself perceives this, that both Jews and Gentiles are under sin, as is also proved by the testimony of the psalm. 'No, in no wise.' He answered his own question.
絕非如此。最後,使徒藉真理的洞察消除這反對,如此說:「並不像我們被人毀謗、有些人硬說我們所講的:我們可以作惡以成善。」這是愚昧的反對,他隨即附上並加以推翻,說:「這等人的定罪是公義的。」有甚麼比一個人親嘗自己罪的刑罰更為公義呢?他們卻謊稱我們否認此事,其實我們所傳講的無非是神公義的審判。「這卻怎麼樣呢?我們比他們強嗎?」意即我們猶太人:我找不出任何理由使一方勝過另一方,因為我們斷定眾人都在罪之下;理性本身也察覺此事,猶太人與外邦人都在罪之下,正如詩篇的見證所證實的。「決不是的。」他自問自答。
1:60
Causati enim sumus. Ratiocinati somus. Judæos et Græco. omnes sub peccato esse. Atque gentiles. Sicut scriptum est: Quia non est justus. Psahnus unde boc testimonium sumpsit, de insipiente loquitur, quod in adventu Cbristi impletum ostendit, quo tempore nullus justus inventus est. Quisquam. Nec Judæus, nec Graecus. Non est intelligens, non est requirens Deum. Quia nOn intelligit, non requirit. Deus autem tunc quæritur, cum ejus inquiritur voluntas et impletur. Omnes declinaverunt. Necesse est ut declinet qui requirere noluit firmamentum. Simul mutiles facti sunt. Ad opus ad quod fuerant procreati. Non est qui faciat bonum.
'For we have charged.' We have reasoned. 'Both Jews and Greeks' — all to be under sin. 'And the Gentiles.' 'As it is written: There is none righteous.' The psalm from which he took this testimony speaks of the foolish man, and he shows that this was fulfilled at the coming of Christ, at which time no righteous one was found. 'No, not one.' Neither Jew nor Greek. 'There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.' Because he does not understand, he does not seek. And God is then sought, when His will is inquired into and fulfilled. 'They are all gone out of the way.' Necessarily he goes astray who has refused to seek the firm foundation. 'They are together become unprofitable.' For the work for which they had been created. 'There is none that doeth good.'
「因為我們已經證明。」我們已經推論。「猶太人和希臘人」都在罪之下。「以及外邦人。」「如經上所記:沒有義人。」他引用此見證所取自的那篇詩篇論及愚頑人,並顯明這在基督降臨時應驗了,那時找不到一個義人。「連一個也沒有。」猶太人沒有,希臘人也沒有。「沒有明白的,沒有尋求神的。」因為他不明白,所以不尋求。當人探究並成就神的旨意時,神才被尋見。「都是偏離正路。」凡拒絕尋求那穩固根基的人,必然偏離。「一同變為無用。」偏離了他們受造所要作的工。「沒有行善的。」
1:61
Non ergo erat qui faceret bonum, cum Judaeos prævaricatio mandatorum, gentes vero naturae lex condemnaret. Cum ergo ex alteratra parte aliquis bonam fecerit, gratiae se debere noverit, non naturæ, sicut propheta ad Dominum referens dicit: Apud quem nemo per se innocens est. Et Isaias in cantico dicit: Domine Deus noster, dabis pacem nobis: omnia enini opera nostra operatos es in nobis. Non est usque ad unum. Quidam dicunt, usque ad Christum. Sepulerum patens est guttur eorum Violentiam' pestiferi odoris exaggerant fetore doctrinae. Omnis odor mortis procedit de ore eorum: hoc est vei a pestifera et adulatoria quæ interficiunt audientes.
There was therefore none to do good, since the transgression of the commandments condemned the Jews, and the law of nature condemned the Gentiles. When therefore someone from either side has done good, let him know that he owes it to grace, not to nature, as the prophet says, referring to the Lord: 'In whose sight no one is innocent of himself.' And Isaiah says in his canticle: 'Lord our God, thou wilt give us peace: for thou hast wrought all our works in us.' 'There is none, even to one.' Some say, up to Christ. 'Their throat is an open sepulchre.' By the stench of their teaching they heap up the violence of their pestilent odour. Every odour of death proceeds from their mouth: that is, from pestilent and flattering words which slay the hearers.
因此沒有一個行善的,因為違背誡命定了猶太人的罪,本性的律則定了外邦人的罪。所以當任何一方有人行了善,他當知道這是虧欠恩典,而非本性,正如先知論及主所說:「在祂面前,無人憑己為無辜。」以賽亞在他的頌歌中也說:「耶和華我們的神啊,你必賜我們平安,因為你在我們裡面成就了我們一切所作的工。」「連一個也沒有。」有些人說,直到基督為止。「他們的喉嚨是敞開的墳墓。」他們以其教訓的臭氣加增其毒害氣味的暴烈。一切死亡的臭氣都從他們口中發出:就是那些殺害聽者的毒害與諂媚之言。
1:62
Ideo enim sepulcra clauduntur, ne in vita positis exhalatione sui generent pestem. Linguis suis dolose agebant. Aliud ore promentes, aliud corde meditantes. Venenum aspidum. Horum serpentum perniciosius cæteris esse fertur venenum. Sub labiis eorum. Id est in corde. Quorum os maledictione. Quidquid enim malo voto dicitur, sine dubio male dicitur. Et amaritudine plenum est. Amaritudo Antichristi contraria est dulcedini verbi Dei. Veloces pedes eorum ad effundendum sanguinem. Non ad liberandas animas, sed ad perdendas, sive inlerficienles animas, non illis annuntiando peccata sua, sed adulatione confirmando eas in ipsis. Unde Paulus dicit: Mundus sum a sanguine omnium.
For this reason sepulchres are closed, lest by the exhalation of their kind they breed a plague among the living. 'With their tongues they have dealt deceitfully.' Uttering one thing with the mouth, meditating another in the heart. 'The poison of asps.' The venom of these serpents is said to be more deadly than that of the rest. 'Is under their lips.' That is, in the heart. 'Whose mouth is full of cursing.' For whatever is spoken with evil intent is without doubt spoken ill. 'And bitterness.' The bitterness of Antichrist is contrary to the sweetness of the word of God. 'Their feet are swift to shed blood.' Not to free souls, but to destroy them, or rather to slay souls, not by announcing to them their sins, but by confirming them in those very sins through flattery. Whence Paul says: 'I am clean from the blood of all.'
因此墳墓被封閉,免得死者以其同類的散發在活人中間滋生瘟疫。「他們用舌頭行詭詐。」口出一言,心懷別意。「虺蛇的毒氣。」據說這些蛇的毒比其餘的更為致命。「在他們嘴唇裡。」即在心中。「他們滿口咒罵。」凡以惡意所說的話,無疑都是惡言。「和苦毒。」敵基督的苦毒與神道的甘甜相反。「他們的腳飛跑流人血。」不是為釋放靈魂,而是為毀滅靈魂,或說是殺害靈魂——不是向他們宣告其罪,而是以諂媚堅固他們在那些罪中。故此保羅說:「眾人的血與我無干。」
1:63
Contritio et infelicitas in viis eorum. Conteruntur et infelices efficiuntur animæ in viis eorum, hoc est in doctrinis vel in exemplis conversationis eorum. Et viam pacis non cognoverunt. Doctrinam Patris, qua Deus hominibus pacaretur, non cognoverunt: quia pax nostra Christus est. Hoc egit a capite epistolæ, ut ostenderet omnes indigere misericordia Dei, misericordia autem in potestate donantis est. Nemo eniin potest dicere se amplius accipere debuisse. Non est timor Dei ante oculos eorum. In timore Dei conclusit: quia si timorem Dei semper ante oculos habuissent, utique non peccassent: neque enim servus audet Domino praesente peccare.
'Destruction and unhappiness are in their ways.' Souls are worn down and made wretched in their ways, that is, in their teachings or in the examples of their conduct. 'And the way of peace they have not known.' The doctrine of the Father, whereby God might be reconciled to men, they have not known: for Christ is our peace. He has treated this from the beginning of the epistle, in order to show that all are in need of the mercy of God, and mercy lies in the power of the giver. For no one can say that he ought to have received more. 'There is no fear of God before their eyes.' He has concluded with the fear of God: for if they had always had the fear of God before their eyes, they would surely not have sinned; for neither does a servant dare to sin in the presence of his master.
「在他們的路中盡是毀滅與災殃。」靈魂在他們的路中,就是在他們的教訓或行為榜樣中,被磨損、變為悲慘。「平安的路,他們未曾知道。」父的道理——神藉此與人和好——他們未曾知道,因為基督是我們的平安。他從書信的開頭就論述此事,為要顯明眾人都需要神的憐憫,而憐憫在乎那賜予者的權柄。因為無人能說他本當領受更多。「他們眼中不怕神。」他以敬畏神作結:因為他們若常將敬畏神放在眼前,必不至犯罪;因為僕人在主人面前也不敢犯罪。
1:64
Scimus autem quoniam quæcunque lex loquitur, his qui in lege sunt loquitur. Ne dicerent Judæi, hoc de gentibus dictum est: Quomodo Judæi dixerunt: Non est Deus, non utique verbo, sed opere. Dominum enin contitentur se nosse, factis autem negant. Ergo gentes hic non tangit, sed jam de gentibus prius dixerat, et de eorum sceleribus nemo dubitabat. Ne dicerent hoc de gentibus scriplum, ostendit omne quod in lege de gentibus dicitur, etiam ipsum de Judaeis dici, quia ipsorum principalis est causa. Ut omne os obstruatur. Non solum gentium, sed tnam Judæorum: cum uon habeant unde possint gloriari. Et subditus fiat omnis mundus Deo. Ut sciat se sine gratia Dei salvum esse non posse:
'Now we know that whatsoever things the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law.' Lest the Jews should say that this was spoken of the Gentiles. — In what manner did the Jews say, 'There is no God'? Not indeed in word, but in deed. For they confess that they know the Lord, but in their works they deny Him. Therefore he does not here touch the Gentiles, but had already spoken of the Gentiles before, and no one doubted concerning their crimes. Lest they should say this was written of the Gentiles, he shows that everything which is said in the law concerning the Gentiles is said also of the Jews themselves, since theirs is the principal case. 'That every mouth may be stopped.' Not only of the Gentiles, but also of the Jews: since they have nothing whereof they can glory. 'And all the world may be made subject to God.' That each may know he cannot be saved without the grace of God;
「我們曉得律法上的話都是對律法以下之人說的。」免得猶太人說這是指外邦人說的。猶太人是怎樣說「沒有神」的呢?不是用言語,而是用行為。因為他們口稱認識主,行事卻否認祂。所以他在此並非針對外邦人,先前他已論及外邦人,且無人懷疑他們的罪行。免得他們說這是指外邦人所寫的,他顯明律法中凡論及外邦人的話,也是論及猶太人自己的,因為猶太人才是主要對象。「好塞住各人的口。」不單是外邦人的口,也是猶太人的口,因為他們沒有可誇的。「叫普世的人都伏在神審判之下。」使各人都知道,若沒有神的恩典就不能得救;
1:65
vel certe in confessione peccati speret misericordiam, cognoscens se esse in peccatis. Quis ex operibus legis. Hoc contra Pelagianos facit, qui dicunt quod lex justificet. Opera autem legis eircumcisionem dicit, et sabbatum, et reliqua. Non justificabitur omnis. Non justificabitur, quia nihil ad perfectum lex adduxit. Hinc contra eos incipit disputare, magno diuturnoque conflictu, quit gloriabantur in lege, et per legem se justificari credebant, et non per gratiam: docens par ordinem legem non potuisse auferre, sed potius auxisse peccatum, quod aufert gratia, quia lex jubere novit, cui succumbit infirmitus, sicut gratia juvare, qua infunditur charitas.
or at least, in the confession of his sin, may hope for mercy, knowing himself to be in sins. 'Because by the works of the law.' This he does against the Pelagians, who say that the law justifies. And by the works of the law he means circumcision, and the sabbath, and the rest. 'No flesh shall be justified.' It shall not be justified, because the law brought nothing to perfection. Hence he begins to dispute against them, with a great and long conflict — against those who gloried in the law, and believed themselves to be justified by the law and not by grace; teaching in order that the law could not take away sin but rather increased it, which grace takes away; because the law knows how to command, to which infirmity succumbs, whereas grace knows how to help, by which charity is poured in.
或至少在承認己罪時盼望憐憫,知道自己身在罪中。「因為凡有血氣的,沒有一個因行律法能在神面前稱義。」這是他針對伯拉糾派所說的,他們主張律法能使人稱義。他所說的律法之工是指割禮、安息日等等。「沒有一個因行律法稱義。」不能稱義,因為律法未曾使甚麼得以完全。於是他開始與他們爭辯,以極大而持久的爭論——針對那些以律法自誇、相信自己是靠律法而非靠恩典稱義的人;他按次序教導,律法不能除去罪,反而加增罪,而恩典能除罪;因為律法只知吩咐,軟弱在其下屈服,而恩典能施幫助,藉此將愛澆灌下來。
1:66
Non dicimus nos justificatos eos fuisse qui fuerunt legi obedientes, sed nisi justificarentur, non essent obedientes. Caro. Homo. Coram illo. Non omnia justitia coram Domino justificat, sed ea quae ex mera Dei voluntate procedit, non illa cujus præceptum humanam lactat iniirmitatem: sicut istorum quibus tunc justitia Dei non poterat revelari, sed sola eis peccati cognitio demonstrala, quia suam quærentes statuere, justitiæ Dei non erant subjecti. Per legem enim cognitio peccati.
We do not say that those were justified who were obedient to the law, but that unless they had been justified, they would not have been obedient. 'Flesh.' Man. 'In his sight.' Not every righteousness is justified in the Lord's sight, but that which proceeds from the pure will of God, not that whose precept merely soothes human infirmity: as was the case of those to whom the righteousness of God could not then be revealed, but to whom only the knowledge of sin was shown, because, seeking to establish their own, they were not subject to the righteousness of God. 'For by the law is the knowledge of sin.'
我們並不是說那些遵行律法的人得了稱義,而是說他們若非先得稱義,就不會遵行。「血氣。」人。「在祂面前。」並非一切義都在主面前稱義,惟有那出於神純全旨意的義才是;而非那只是撫慰人性軟弱之誡命的義:正如那些人,神的義那時不能向他們顯明,只將罪的知識指示給他們,因為他們想要立自己的義,就不服神的義。「因為律法本是叫人知罪。」
1:67
Non remissio, non consumptio, sed cognitio, aut quia in oblivione erat lex naturae, aut quia ante legem litteræ leviora quæque non cognoscebantur esse peccata, sicut concupiscentia, et cætera quae non alteri nocebant, sed ipsi. Nunc aulem sine lege justitia Dei. Quæ nobis a Deo gratis donata est, non nostro labore quæsita. Manifesta est. Quæ erat occulta. Testificata a lege et prophetis. Hæc justitia legis oraculis prædicata est novissimis ventura temporibus. Justitia autem Dei per fidem Jesu Christi.
Not remission, not consumption, but knowledge — either because the law of nature was in oblivion, or because before the law of the letter the lighter offences were not known to be sins, such as concupiscence, and other things which harmed not another but the man himself. 'But now the righteousness of God without the law.' Which has been freely given to us by God, not obtained by our labour. 'Is made manifest.' Which was hidden. 'Being witnessed by the law and the prophets.' This righteousness was proclaimed by the oracles of the law as about to come in the last times. 'But the righteousness of God is by faith of Jesus Christ.'
不是赦免,不是除滅,而是知曉——或因本性的律曾被遺忘,或因在成文律法之前,那些較輕的過犯尚未被認出是罪,如私慾,以及其他不害別人只害自己的事。「但如今神的義在律法以外已經顯明出來。」這義是神白白賜給我們的,不是我們勞力賺得的。「已經顯明。」原是隱藏的。「有律法和先知為證。」這義藉律法的神諭被宣告為將在末後之時來到。「就是神的義,因信耶穌基督。」
1:68
Justitia haec, quas confertur per fidem, fides ipsa occulta insDiratione Dei gratiae dono infunditur, non labore humano, nec opere Veteris Testamenti acquiritur, quia, ut dictum est, ipsius donum est ut credamus. Super omnes qui credunt. Non super solos Judaeos. Ostendit illos ideo talem legem accepisse, quia non credebant, quapropter in praesenti sive peccati, sive justitiæmeritum referebant. Non enim est distinctio. Omnes enim peccaverunt et egent gloria Dei. Id est, inter Judaeum et gentilem, quia utraque pars in incredulitate conclusa est, et egent gloria Redemptoris, quae in salutem credentium dilatatur.
This righteousness, which is conferred through faith — faith itself is poured in by the hidden inspiration of God as a gift of grace, not acquired by human labour nor by the work of the Old Testament; because, as has been said, it is His gift that we should believe. 'Unto all that believe.' Not upon the Jews alone. He shows that they received such a law for this reason, because they did not believe, and therefore in the present they referred either the merit of sin or of righteousness. 'For there is no distinction.' 'For all have sinned and need the glory of God.' That is, between Jew and Gentile, since both parties have been shut up in unbelief, and they need the glory of the Redeemer, which is extended unto the salvation of believers.
這義是藉信而賜的——信本身乃是藉神隱密的感動、作為恩典的禮物而澆灌下來的,不是靠人的勞力,也不是靠舊約的行為所得的;因為如前所說,我們能信乃是祂的恩賜。「加給一切相信的人。」不單加給猶太人。他顯明他們之所以領受這樣的律法,正是因為他們不信,因此在今世按罪或按義去衡量賞罰。「並沒有分別。」「因為世人都犯了罪,虧缺了神的榮耀。」即猶太人與外邦人之間並無分別,因為兩方都被圈在不信之中,且需要救贖主的榮耀,這榮耀廣施於信者的救恩上。
1:69
Nam Judæi legem litterae, gentiles naturæ legem transgrediendo, pariter peccatores inventi sunt, et per originale peccatum, et per actuale. Justificati gratis. Sine ullis praecedentibus meritis, per baptismum juslificali. Cum omnibus non merentibus gratis peccata donavit, audi gratis, et tace de meritis. Per gratiam ipsius. Quia quod non debebat pro nobis exsolvit, ut nos gratis redemptos salvaret. Per redemptionem quæ est in Christo Jesu. De captivitate peccati redempti sumus, non natura, quia natura semper ipsius fuimus, quia qui redimit, suum docet fuisse quem redimit, sicut docet propheta: Gratis venundati estis, et sine pecunia redimemini. Christus ergo nos redemit, sicut dicit Petrus:
For the Jews, by transgressing the law of the letter, and the Gentiles by transgressing the law of nature, were alike found sinners, both through original sin and through actual sin. 'Being justified freely.' Without any preceding merits, justified through baptism. Since He freely forgave the sins of all who did not deserve it, hear 'freely,' and be silent about merits. 'By His grace.' Because He paid on our behalf what He did not owe, that He might save us who were freely redeemed. 'Through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus.' We have been redeemed from the captivity of sin, not from nature, because by nature we were always His own; for he who redeems teaches that the one he redeems was his own, as the prophet teaches: 'You were sold for nothing, and you shall be redeemed without money.' Christ therefore redeemed us, as Peter says:
因為猶太人違背了成文的律法,外邦人違背了本性的律法,同樣被判為罪人,既因原罪,又因本罪。「白白地稱義。」沒有任何在先的功德,藉洗禮稱義。既然祂白白赦免了眾不配之人的罪,你就當聽「白白地」,對功德緘默。「藉著祂的恩典。」因為祂為我們償還了祂本不欠的,好叫祂拯救我們這些白白蒙救贖的人。「因基督耶穌的救贖。」我們是從罪的擄掠中被贖回,不是從本性中,因為按本性我們原就一直屬祂;因為救贖者顯明他所救贖的原是屬他的,正如先知所教導:「你們是無價被賣的,也必無銀被贖。」所以基督救贖了我們,正如彼得所說:
1:70
Scientes quia non corruptibilibus argento et auro redempti estis de vana vestra conversatione, et reliqua; et Paulus: Empti enim estis pretio magno. Redempti ergo sumus de morte. cui per peccatum venditi fueramus, secundum Isaiam dicentem: Quis liber repudii ? Peccatis enim vestris venundati estis. Quam mortem Christus evicit, qui peccatum non fecit, quia omnes debitores eramus morti per peccatum. Ille autem se tradidit morti, cui nihil debebat, ut nos suo sanguine a morte redimeret. Non emit, quia per naturam ipsius fueramus; sed redemit, quia captivi tenebamur. Quem proposuit Deus propitiationem per fidem in sanguine ipsius.
'Knowing that you were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation,' and so forth; and Paul: 'For you are bought with a great price.' We have therefore been redeemed from the death to which we had been sold through sin, according to Isaiah who says: 'What is this bill of divorce? For you were sold for your sins.' This death Christ overcame, He who did no sin, because we were all debtors to death through sin. But He delivered Himself over to death, to which He owed nothing, that He might redeem us from death by His own blood. He did not buy us, because we were His by His own nature; but He redeemed us, because we were held captive. 'Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in His blood.'
「知道你們得贖,脫去你們祖宗所傳流虛妄的行為,不是憑著能壞的金銀等物」等等;保羅也說:「因為你們是重價買來的。」所以我們是從死裡被贖回——就是我們因罪被賣給的那死,正如以賽亞所說:「休書在哪裡呢?你們是因自己的罪孽被賣的。」這死被基督勝過了,祂是沒有犯罪的,因為我們都因罪欠了死。但祂將自己交與死,祂本不欠死甚麼,好用自己的血把我們從死裡贖回。祂不是買我們,因為我們按祂的本性原就屬祂;祂乃是贖我們,因為我們被擄為奴。「神設立耶穌作挽回祭,是憑著祂的血,藉著人的信。」
1:71
In promptu posuit, quia gratis dat, ut nec desperet aliquis, nec de suis meritis extollatur, quia propitiatio et remissio peccatorum per sanguinem est Christi collata, in cujns typo etiam in Veteri Testamento pro peccalis populi victimarum sanguis offerebatur. Ad ostensionem justitiæ suæ. In hoc dicit ostendisse justitiam, quod indefensam tenuit pro emendationis nostrae exspectatione patientiam; ita nobis fit misericordia remissionis, dum ille patitur qui nihil peccavit, quia omnia Deus juste facit. Juste ergo diabolus perdidit debitorem, quia injuste occidit innocentem. Propter remissionem præcedentium delictorum. Quare præcedentium ? nisi originalium debitorum. In sustentatione Dei.
He has set it forth openly, because He gives freely, so that no one should despair, nor be exalted on account of his own merits; because propitiation and the remission of sins has been bestowed through the blood of Christ, in a figure of which, even in the Old Testament, the blood of victims was offered for the sins of the people. 'For the manifestation of His righteousness.' In this He says He manifested His righteousness, in that He held His forbearance unwavering in expectation of our amendment; thus mercy of remission comes to us, while He suffers who committed no sin, because God does all things justly. Justly therefore did the devil lose the debtor, because he unjustly slew the innocent. 'For the remission of former sins.' Why 'former'? — unless of the debts of original sin. 'Through the forbearance of God.'
祂公然設立了,因為祂白白賜下,使無人絕望,也無人因自己的功德自高;因為挽回與赦罪乃是藉基督的血所賜的,作為其預表,甚至在舊約中也為百姓的罪獻上祭牲的血。「為要顯明祂的義。」祂說祂在此顯明了祂的義,因祂為等候我們悔改而堅忍不移地施行寬容;如此,赦罪的憐憫臨到我們,而那受苦的乃是無罪者,因為神所行的一切都是公義的。所以魔鬼失去那欠債者是公義的,因為牠不義地殺害了無辜者。「為要顯明祂在先所犯的罪。」為何說「在先」?無非是指原罪之債。「因祂的寬容。」
1:72
Sustentatio Dei ad majora peccata profecerat. Ad ostensionem justitiae ejus. Ut revelaret justitiam quae ex fide est, hoc est Christum, in hoc tempore novissimo. Ut ipse sic justus et justificans. Qui solus justus inventus est, et quæ ipse justificaverit, quia peccatum nescivit, ideo peccata damnavit. Eum qui ex fide est Jesu. Ex fide, inquit, Jesu, quam ipse Jesus dedit, et non ex operibus legis aut naturae. Ubi est eryo gloriatio tua? Exclusa est. Ad Judæos dicit. Ubi est elatio tua, in qua gloriabaris te meliorem esse per circumcisionem carnalem ? Exclusa est gloriatio tua. Per quam legem? factorum? Non, sed per legem fidei. Sequitur: Nunquid per factorum, id est opera legis?
The forbearance of God had advanced toward greater sins. 'For the manifestation of His righteousness.' That He might reveal the righteousness which is of faith, that is, Christ, in this last time. 'That He Himself might be just, and the justifier.' He who alone was found just, and who justifies those whom He Himself has justified; because He knew no sin, therefore He condemned sins. 'Of him who is of the faith of Jesus.' 'Of faith,' he says, 'of Jesus,' which Jesus Himself gave, and not of the works of the law or of nature. 'Where is then thy glorying? It is excluded.' He speaks to the Jews. Where is your pride, in which you gloried that you were better by carnal circumcision? Your glorying is excluded. 'By what law? of works?' No, but by the law of faith. There follows: 'Is it by works,' that is, by the works of the law?
神的寬容曾向更大的罪伸展。「為要顯明祂的義。」使祂在這末後之時顯明那本乎信的義,就是基督。「使祂自己為義,也稱人為義。」惟有祂被尋見為義,並使祂所稱義的人為義;因為祂不知罪,所以祂定了罪。「就是稱那信耶穌的人為義。」他說「信」,「信耶穌」,這是耶穌自己所賜的,而非出於律法或本性的行為。「既是這樣,哪裡能誇口呢?沒有可誇的了。」他是對猶太人說的。你憑肉身割禮自誇為更優越的那驕傲在哪裡呢?你的誇口沒有了。「用何法沒有的?是用立功之法嗎?」不是,乃用信主之法。接著說:「是憑行為嗎?」即憑律法的行為嗎?
1:73
et respondet: Non, sed legem fidei. Legem dicit fidei gratiam, per quam ad Christum accedimus, per quam fidem accipimus. Arbitramur enim justificari hominem per fidem. Definimus, certi sumus, hoc judicamus. Sine operibus legis. Addendo legis, ostendit esse et fidei opera. Quomodo ergo Jacobus ait: Fides sine operibus mortua est? Sed Paulus de operibus legis dicit, Jacobus autem de operibus quae fidelem hominem esse probant, sicut ipse in sequentibus exponit: Ostende mihi ex operibus fidem tuam. Opera sunt per quae fides agnoscitur. An Judæorum Deus ? Nonne omnes Deus fecit, et similiter de omnibus cura est ei?
And he answers: No, but by the law of faith. He calls the grace of faith 'the law of faith,' through which we come to Christ, through which we receive faith. 'For we account that a man is justified by faith.' We define, we are certain, this we judge. 'Without the works of the law.' By adding 'of the law,' he shows that there are also works of faith. How then does James say: 'Faith without works is dead'? But Paul speaks of the works of the law, whereas James speaks of the works which prove a man to be faithful, as he himself sets forth in what follows: 'Show me thy faith by thy works.' Works are those by which faith is recognized. 'Is He the God of the Jews only?' Did not God make all, and does He not equally care for all?
他回答說:不是,乃是用信主之法。他稱信的恩典為「信主之法」,我們藉此來到基督面前,藉此領受信。「因為我們看定了:人稱義是因著信。」我們斷定、我們確知、我們如此判斷。「不在乎遵行律法。」他加上「律法」二字,顯明也有信的行為。那麼雅各為何說:「信心沒有行為是死的」?其實保羅所說的是律法的行為,雅各所說的卻是證明人有信的行為,正如他自己在下文所述:「你將你的信心指給我看。」行為就是使信心得以被認出的。「難道神只作猶太人的神嗎?」神豈不是造了萬人,且同樣顧念眾人嗎?
1:74
Non solum vobis, sed et gentibus venit Christus ex lege promissus, imo magis ipsis. Tantum. Quasi Judaei dicant: Sed gentes Deum dereliquerunt, et respondeatur eis: Et vos. Illi peccaverunt, et vos. Sed nos convertimur, et illi. Nobis Christus venit promissus, et illis. Non ergo vester tantum est Deus, aut quasi vos nesciatis quod omnes ex Adam nati sunt, et quod scriptum sit, gentes Christo credituras, sicut dicit: Domus mea, domus orationis vocabitur omnibus gentibus. Et iterum: Audite vocem tubae, et dixerunl: Non audiemus. Propter hoc audient gentes. Nonne et gentium ? Ex gentibus credentium, quia frequenter prophetæ de eorum vocatione dixerunt. Imo et gentium.
Not to you only, but also to the Gentiles came Christ, promised from the law — nay rather to them the more. 'Only.' As though the Jews should say: But the Gentiles forsook God; and it is answered them: And you too. They sinned, and you too. But we are converted, and they too. To us came the promised Christ, and to them too. Therefore He is not your God only, or as if you did not know that all are born of Adam, and that it was written that the Gentiles would believe in Christ, as He says: 'My house shall be called a house of prayer for all nations.' And again: 'Hear the voice of the trumpet, and they said, We will not hear. For this the Gentiles shall hear.' 'Is He not also of the Gentiles?' Of the Gentiles who believe, since the prophets frequently spoke of their calling. 'Yea, of the Gentiles also.'
基督不單為你們而來,也為外邦人而來,是律法所應許的——不,更是為他們而來。「單單。」彷彿猶太人說:但外邦人離棄了神;就有話回答他們:你們也是如此。他們犯了罪,你們也犯了罪。但我們歸正了,他們也歸正了。所應許的基督為我們而來,也為他們而來。所以祂不單是你們的神,你們豈不知眾人都是從亞當所生,且經上記著外邦人要信基督,正如祂所說:「我的殿必稱為萬國禱告的殿。」又說:「你們要聽角聲,他們卻說,我們不聽。因此外邦人必要聽。」「不也是外邦人的神嗎?」是那些相信的外邦人的神,因為先知屢次論及他們蒙召。「也是外邦人的神。」
1:75
Id est multo magis et gentium, quia ante legem sancti Deo placuerunt. Optime autem modum servavit in verbis: imo dixit, ut ostenderet magis gentes, quia ante fuerunt sancti præputiati quam circumcisi, et Abraham ante circumcisionem justificatus credidit. Quoniam quidem unus Deus qui justificat circumcisionem ex fide. Utramque gentem per fidem Christi salvandam esse denuntiat, hoc est, ex fide. Nam nec praeputium, nec circumcisio sine fide justificatur. Et præputium per fidem. Sicut Abel, Noe, et caeteri. Legem ergo destruimus per fidem? Absit. Legem ergo per fidem destruimus, quæ circumcisionem docuit ? Absit. In tantum ut dicat Moysen propter circumcisum filium pene interfectum fuisse.
That is, much more also of the Gentiles, because before the law the saints pleased God. And he best preserved the manner in his words: he said 'nay rather,' to show the Gentiles the more, because there were holy uncircumcised men before there were circumcised, and Abraham believed and was justified before circumcision. 'Seeing it is one God who justifieth the circumcision by faith.' He announces that both peoples are to be saved through the faith of Christ, that is, by faith. For neither the uncircumcision nor the circumcision is justified without faith. 'And the uncircumcision through faith.' As Abel, Noah, and the rest. 'Do we then make void the law through faith?' By no means. Do we then make void the law through faith, which taught circumcision? By no means — so much so that he says Moses was nearly slain on account of his circumcised son.
就是說,更是外邦人的神,因為在律法之前眾聖徒就已蒙神喜悅。他在措辭中極善地保持了分寸:他說「不,更是」,為要更加顯明外邦人,因為在有受割禮者之前,就先有聖潔的未受割禮者,而亞伯拉罕在受割禮之前就相信並得稱義了。「神既是一位,祂就要因信稱那受割禮的為義。」他宣告兩族的人都要藉基督的信得救,就是本乎信。因為無論是未受割禮或受割禮的,沒有信就不得稱義。「也要因信稱那未受割禮的為義。」如亞伯、挪亞及其餘的人。「這樣,我們因信廢了律法嗎?」絕非如此。那麼我們因信廢了那教導割禮的律法嗎?絕非如此——甚至他說摩西曾因其受割禮的兒子險些被殺。
1:76
Ne ergo illi dicerent: Legem ergo destruis, in qua omnes qui crediderunt justi circumcisi fuerunt ante legem incircumcisi, sed tamen nullus incircumcisus in lege. Non solus, ait, non destruo, sed confirmo, dum hanc praedico circumcisionem, quam ille praedixit: In novissimis, inquit, diebus circumcidet Dominus Deus cor tuum, et cor seminis tui, ad Deum tuum amandum. Hæc est fides. Tunc destruerem legem, si illam mentitam dicerem, hoc est non cessaturam, cum illa se promiserit cessaturam, sicut dicit Jeremias: Dabo vobis testamentum novum. Et Isaias: Ex Sion egredietur lex, et verbum Domini de Jerusalem. Sed legem statuimus.
Lest therefore they should say: You then destroy the law, in which all who believed were righteous, being circumcised — before the law they were uncircumcised, but nevertheless none was uncircumcised under the law. Not only, he says, do I not destroy it, but I confirm it, while I preach this circumcision which that one foretold: 'In the last days,' he says, 'the Lord God will circumcise thy heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love thy God.' This is faith. Then would I destroy the law, if I called it false — that is, saying it would not cease, when it promised of itself that it would cease, as Jeremiah says: 'I will give you a new covenant.' And Isaiah: 'Out of Sion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.' 'But we establish the law.'
因此免得他們說:你既如此,就廢了律法,在律法中凡相信的都是義人,都受了割禮——在律法之前他們是未受割禮的,然而在律法之下卻無一未受割禮的。他說:我不但不廢它,反而堅固它,因我傳講那位所預言的割禮:「在末後的日子,」祂說,「耶和華你的神必給你心行割禮,並你後裔的心,使你愛你的神。」這就是信。惟有當我稱律法為虛謊時,我才廢了律法——就是說它不會止息,然而它自己既應許要止息,正如耶利米所說:「我要與你們立新約。」以賽亞也說:「律法必出於錫安,耶和華的言語必出於耶路撒冷。」「更是堅固律法。」
1:77
Stare facimus, dum probamus verum esse quod dixit de antiquis justis et gentibus credituris, et spiritualem circumcisionem venturam, dum hoc efficit fides, quod lex jubet, quae fides si non sit, jubet tantum lex, et non implentes jussa reos tenet, quae non impletur, nisi per cbaritatem, quam Spiritus sanctus infundit per gratiam suam. CAP. IV. Quid ergo dicimus invenisse Abraham patrem nostrum ? Revocat illos ad caput circumcisionis, ut quod initio constiterit, id habeatur in toto. Circumcisio in carne est, fides autem in mente consistit. Abraham secundum fidem per praeputium pater est gentium, secundum carnem pater est circumcisionis.
We cause it to stand, while we prove to be true what it said concerning the ancient righteous ones and the Gentiles who would believe, and that a spiritual circumcision would come, while faith accomplishes what the law commands — which faith if it be not present, the law only commands, and holds guilty those who fulfil not its commands; for the law is not fulfilled except through charity, which the Holy Spirit pours in through His grace. CHAPTER IV. 'What then shall we say that Abraham our father hath found?' He recalls them to the head of circumcision, that what stood firm at the beginning may be held throughout. Circumcision is in the flesh, but faith consists in the mind. Abraham according to faith through the uncircumcision is the father of the Gentiles; according to the flesh he is the father of the circumcision.
我們使律法站立,因我們證實了它所論及古時義人與將要相信之外邦人的話為真,且證實屬靈的割禮要來到,因信成就了律法所吩咐的——這信若不存在,律法就只是吩咐,並將不遵守其命令者定為有罪;因為律法惟藉愛心才得成全,這愛是聖靈藉祂的恩典所澆灌的。第四章。「如此說來,我們的祖宗亞伯拉罕憑著肉體得了甚麼呢?」他把他們召回到割禮的根源,使起初所確立的能貫徹始終。割禮在乎肉身,信卻在乎心思。亞伯拉罕按信、藉未受割禮,是外邦人的父;按肉身,他是受割禮之人的父。
1:78
Fides autem qua pater est gentium, non in carne, sed in mente consistit. Secundum carnem, Id est secundum carnis circumcisionem. Si enim Abraham ex operibus justificatus est, habet gloriam. Quomodo ex operibui, cum et ipse ex gentibus venerit? Sed non apud Deum. Sed apud semetipsum habet, quia jussa perficit; aliter ergo nihil. Illi Deus donavit, sed ex se, sed ex operibus suis habuit gloriam. Sed quia illum fides a Deo donata sine operum praesumptione justificat, non sibi, sed Domino ex gratuita largitate dat gloriam.
But the faith by which he is the father of the Gentiles consists not in the flesh, but in the mind. 'According to the flesh.' That is, according to the circumcision of the flesh. 'For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath glory.' How by works, since he too came from among the Gentiles? 'But not before God.' But he has it before himself, because he fulfils the commands; otherwise, nothing. If God had given to him, yet he had glory from himself, from his own works. But since the faith given by God justifies him without the presumption of works, he gives glory not to himself but to the Lord, out of His gratuitous bounty.
但他藉以作外邦人之父的那信,不在乎肉身,乃在乎心思。「憑著肉體。」即憑著肉身的割禮。「倘若亞伯拉罕是因行為稱義,就有可誇的。」怎會因行為呢,既然他也是從外邦人而來?「只是在神面前並無可誇。」但他在自己面前有可誇,因他遵行了命令;否則就一無所有。神若曾賜給他,他卻是憑自己、憑自己的行為得榮耀。然而,既然神所賜的信不憑行為的自恃使他稱義,他就不將榮耀歸給自己,乃歸給主,出於祂白白的慷慨。
1:79
Dicit ergo beatum Abraham non ex operibus (quia ante legem fuit), sed ex fide (quia promissis Dei credidit) invenisse justitiam, et quia fides per gratiam Dei non solum peccatorem, sed et impium pro Dei bonitate justificat, dum non ex operibus habet fiduciam, sed per omnia se Deo intelligit debitorem, quia nihil invenit quod sibi arrogare possit ex meritis. Quid enim Scriptura dicit ? Scripturam interrogemus. Credidit Abraham Deo. Probavit, et ideo apud Deum habet gloriam. Tam magna fuit dono Dei fides Abrahæ, ut et pristina ei peccata donarentur, et sola ei pro omni justitia duceretur, accepto et tanto amore flagravit, ut deinceps semper Deo placeret. Et reputatum est illi ad justitiam.
He says therefore that blessed Abraham found righteousness not by works (because he lived before the law), but by faith (because he believed the promises of God); and because faith through the grace of God justifies not only the sinner but even the ungodly, on account of God's goodness, while he has confidence not from works, but understands himself in all things to be a debtor to God, because he found nothing which he could arrogate to himself from merits. 'For what saith the Scripture?' Let us question the Scripture. 'Abraham believed God.' He proved it, and therefore has glory before God. So great was Abraham's faith, by the gift of God, that both his former sins were forgiven him, and it alone was reckoned to him for all righteousness; and having received it, he burned with so great love that thenceforth he ever pleased God. 'And it was reputed to him unto righteousness.'
因此他說,蒙福的亞伯拉罕不是因行為(因他生在律法之前),乃是因信(因他信了神的應許)尋見了義;並且因為信藉神的恩典不但使罪人、甚至使不敬虔的人稱義,這是出於神的良善,而亞伯拉罕的把握不是出於行為,乃是明白自己在一切事上都是神的欠債者,因為他找不到任何能憑功德據為己有的。「經上說甚麼呢?」讓我們求問聖經。「亞伯拉罕信神。」他證實了,因此在神面前有可誇。亞伯拉罕的信因著神的恩賜是何等偉大,以致他從前的罪都蒙赦免,而這信本身就算為他全備的義;他既領受了這信,就以極大的愛火熱起來,以致從此常討神喜悅。「這就算為他的義。」
1:80
Compensatum sola fides. Ei autetn qui operatur, merces non imputatur secundum gratiam, sed secundum debitum. Exponit ipsum exemplum. Et quia lex opera requirit, per quae elatus furat Pharisaeus; cum ergo justificat impium divina miseratio, locum meriti non potest habere praesumptio. Debitor enim est antequam pareat praeceptis, et nisi paruerit, damnatus. Si autem fecerit, non habet gloriam, quia inutilis servus est, qui nihil amplius operatur. Si vero qui non operatur. De circumcisione dicit, et caeteris bujusmodi. Credenti autem in eum, qui justificat impium. Impium per soiam fidem justificat, non opera, quae non habuit; si enim secundum opera, puniendus est, non liberandus.
Faith alone was reckoned as recompense. 'Now to him that worketh, the reward is not reckoned according to grace, but according to debt.' He sets forth the example itself. And because the law requires works, whereby the Pharisee was exalted; when therefore the divine compassion justifies the ungodly, presumption can have no place of merit. For he is a debtor before he obeys the precepts, and unless he obey, he is condemned. But if he do them, he has no glory, because he is an unprofitable servant, who does nothing more. 'But to him that worketh not.' He speaks of the circumcision, and of other things of this kind. 'But believeth in Him that justifieth the ungodly.' He justifies the ungodly by faith alone, not by works, which he did not have; for if according to works, he must be punished, not delivered.
惟獨信被算為報償。「作工的得工價,不算恩典,乃是該得的。」他闡明這例子本身。並且因為律法要求行為,法利賽人藉此自高;所以當神的憐憫使不敬虔的人稱義時,自恃就毫無功德之地。因為人在遵行誡命之前就是欠債的,若不遵行就被定罪。但他若遵行了,也沒有可誇,因為他是無用的僕人,並沒有多作甚麼。「惟有不作工的。」他是指割禮及其他此類的事。「只信稱罪人為義的神。」祂惟獨憑信使不敬虔的人稱義,不憑他所沒有的行為;因為若按行為,他就當受刑罰,而非蒙拯救。
1:81
Simul attendendum non peccatorem justificari per fidem, sed impium. Reputatur fides ejus ad justitiam, secundum propositum gratiæ Dei: sicut et David dicit. Sicut Abrahæ; et nostra filiorum ejus per gratiam. Beatitudinem hominis. Magna beatitudo est, sine labore legis, vel pœnitentiæ fidem per solam gratiam promereri, secundum propositum Dei, quo proposuit gratis peccata dimittere. Cui Deus accepto fert justitiam sine operibus. Illi accepto fertur justitiam * sine operibus, qui per fidem, qua primum Deo credidit, et de præterito absolvitur, et de praesenti justifica. tur, et ad futura fidei opera praeparatur.
At the same time it must be noted that it is not the sinner who is justified by faith, but the ungodly. 'His faith is reputed unto righteousness,' according to the purpose of the grace of God: 'as David also saith.' As of Abraham; and of us his sons through grace. 'The blessedness of a man.' Great is the blessedness, without the labour of the law or of penance, to obtain faith through grace alone, according to the purpose of God, whereby He purposed to forgive sins freely. 'Unto whom God reckoneth righteousness without works.' To him righteousness is reckoned without works, who by faith — whereby he first believed God — is both absolved from the past, and justified in the present, and prepared for the future works of faith.
同時當注意,因信稱義的不是罪人,而是不敬虔的人。「他的信算為義」,是照著神恩典的旨意:「正如大衛所說的。」如論亞伯拉罕;也論我們這藉恩典作他兒子的人。「人的福。」極大的福,就是不憑律法的勞苦或悔罪的勞苦,惟藉恩典得著信,照著神所預定要白白赦罪的旨意。「就是神算為義、不在乎行為的人。」義算給那人,不在乎行為,就是那藉信——他藉此起初信了神——既從過去得赦免,又在現今得稱義,並為將來信的行為得預備的人。
1:82
Probare vult et in ipsa lege praedici, justitiam sine operibus prodesse, nec se hoc suo defendere, sed prophetae exemplo firmare. Quod remittitur, non est, quod te. gitur non patet, et ideo nec imputatur. Beati quorum remissæ sunt iniquitates. Contra Judaei arrogantiam, quia beatitudo et remissio peccatorum credulitatis opus est, non laboris. Quidam dicunt remitti peccata per baptismum, tegi lacrymis pœnitentiæ, non imputari ulla peccata in martyrio. Quamvis totum in fide baptismi possit intelligi, tamen cum remissa fuerint delicta, diligitur Deus. Cui enim plus dimittitur, plus diligit, et ideo charitas operit multitudinem peccatorum, ut superet dilectio pristinum contemptum.
He wishes to prove that even in the law itself it is foretold that righteousness without works profits, and that he does not defend this by his own authority, but confirms it by the example of the prophet. What is remitted is not; what is covered is not disclosed, and therefore neither is it imputed. 'Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven.' Against the arrogance of the Jew, because blessedness and the remission of sins is the work of belief, not of labour. Some say that sins are remitted through baptism, covered by the tears of penance, and not imputed at all in martyrdom. Although the whole may be understood in the faith of baptism, yet when sins have been forgiven, God is loved. For to whom more is forgiven, he loves more, and therefore charity covers a multitude of sins, so that love may overcome the former contempt.
他要證明,甚至在律法本身之中就預言了不在乎行為的義是有益的,並且他不是憑己權柄辯護此事,乃是以先知的例子加以確證。所赦免的就不再存在;所遮蓋的既不顯露,因此也不歸算。「得赦免其過的,這人是有福的。」這是針對猶太人的自誇,因為福分與赦罪乃是相信的工作,非勞力的工作。有些人說,罪藉洗禮得赦,藉悔罪的眼淚得遮蓋,在殉道中則全然不被歸算。雖然這一切都可在洗禮的信中理解,然而當罪蒙赦免時,神就被愛。因為赦免誰的多,誰的愛就多,所以愛能遮掩許多的罪,使愛勝過從前的輕慢。
1:83
Non autem imputat, dum bonis ejus deinceps operibus, quae per charitatem fiunt, delectatur, nec reminiscitur ejus ante factorum. Et quorum tecta sunt peccata. Charitate. Beatus vir cui non imputavit Dominus peccatum. Ne rememoratur. Beatitudo ergo hæc in circumcisione, an etiam in præputio ? Volunt aliqui istam beatitudinem tribus temporibus assignare, Naturae, Circumcisioni et Christianitati, sed ut eos a gloria privilegii excludat, ipse dicit, non in circumcisione, sed in praeputio. Dicimus enim quia reputata est Abrahæ fides ad justitiam. Quia utrique confitemur justificatum;
But He imputes not, while thenceforth He delights in his good works, which are done through charity, nor does He remember his former deeds. 'And whose sins are covered.' By charity. 'Blessed is the man to whom the Lord hath not imputed sin.' Nor remembers it. 'Is this blessedness then in the circumcision, or also in the uncircumcision?' Some wish to assign this blessedness to three times: Nature, Circumcision, and Christianity; but in order to exclude them from the glory of privilege, he himself says, not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. 'For we say that faith was reputed to Abraham unto righteousness.' Because we both confess him to have been justified;
但祂不歸算,因祂從此以他藉愛心所行的善工為喜悅,也不追念他從前的作為。「得遮蓋其罪的。」藉愛心。「主不算為有罪的,這人是有福的。」也不追念。「如此看來,這福是單加給那受割禮的人嗎,還是也加給那未受割禮的人呢?」有些人想把這福分歸於三個時期:本性、割禮、基督信仰;但為要把他們排除在特權的榮耀之外,他自己說,不是在割禮,乃是在未受割禮。「我們所說,亞伯拉罕的信就算為他的義。」因為我們都承認他已得稱義;
1:84
quia ergo de Abraham tractamus, quod de ipso inveniret ralio, hoc in omnibus accipiamus, hoc omnes indubitanter teneamus, quia fides haec non soli Abrahæ profuerit, sed omnibus qui credulitatis suae sequuntur exemplum, sicut ia sequentibus legimus, ut reputetur illi ad justitiam. Quomodo ergo reputata est, in circumcisione an in præputio ?Videamus utrum propterea justus, quia circumcisus; an ideo circumcisus, quia justus inventus est: utrum circumcisio de justitia, an justitia de circumcisione sit nata. Non in circumcisione, sed in præputio. Ante justificatus est quam circumcideretur. Non ergo propter circumcisionem justificatus est. Et signum accepit circumcisionis. Ne dicerent:
since therefore we treat of Abraham, let us take in all cases what reason finds concerning him, let us all hold this without doubt, that this faith profited not Abraham alone, but all who follow the example of his belief, as we read in what follows, that it may be reputed to him for righteousness. 'How then was it reckoned? in circumcision, or in uncircumcision?' Let us see whether he was righteous because circumcised, or was circumcised because found righteous: whether circumcision was born of righteousness, or righteousness of circumcision. 'Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.' He was justified before he was circumcised. Therefore he was not justified on account of circumcision. 'And he received the sign of circumcision.' Lest they should say:
因此,既然我們論及亞伯拉罕,就讓我們在一切事上採納理性論及他所發現的,讓我們都毫無疑惑地持守此理,就是這信不單使亞伯拉罕得益,也使一切效法他相信之榜樣的人得益,正如我們在下文所讀到的,使這信算為他的義。「是怎麼算的呢?是在受割禮的時候呢,還是在未受割禮的時候呢?」讓我們看看他是因受了割禮才為義,還是因被尋見為義才受割禮:是割禮出於義,還是義出於割禮。「不是在受割禮的時候,乃是在未受割禮的時候。」他在受割禮之前就已稱義。所以他不是因割禮才稱義。「並且他受了割禮的記號。」免得他們說:
1:85
Quid ergo circumcisus est, si non indigebat circumcisione? Signum est, inquit, justitiae, non augmentum. Item aliter: Ut ostenderet quam justus et fidelis esset, qui dolorem sibi ex mandato Dei non dubitavit inferre, non putans superfluum, quod ab scientiarum Domino jubebatur. sicut nec parricidium impium, quod fons praeceperat pietatis. Signaculum justitiæ fidei. Ut significaret justitiam Christi, quæ ex fide est, quae nunc est in præputio, sive quae ei in præputio est nata. Item aliter: Tam perfecta fuit fides cujus, ut signaculum mereretur, semper res plena signatur et magna. Quæ est in præputio. Nunc in his quae ex gentibus credunt. Ut sit pater omnium credentium per præputium.
Why then was he circumcised, if he did not need circumcision? It is a sign, he says, of righteousness, not an increase. Again, otherwise: That he might show how righteous and faithful he was, who did not hesitate to inflict pain upon himself at the command of God, not thinking that superfluous which was commanded by the Lord of all knowledge — just as neither was the impious act of slaying his son, which the fount of piety had commanded. 'A seal of the righteousness of faith.' That he might signify the righteousness of Christ, which is of faith, which is now in the uncircumcision, or which was born to him in the uncircumcision. Again, otherwise: So perfect was his faith that it deserved a seal; a thing full and great is always sealed. 'Which is in the uncircumcision.' Now in those who believe from among the Gentiles. 'That he might be the father of all them that believe through uncircumcision.'
那麼他既不需要割禮,為何受割禮呢?他說,這是義的記號,不是義的增添。又或者,另有一解:為要顯明他是何等的公義與忠信,他毫不遲疑地照神的命令使自己受痛苦,並不以為那由全知之主所吩咐的是多餘的——正如他獻子那看似不虔的舉動也不是多餘的,因那是虔敬之源所吩咐的。「作他因信稱義的印證。」為要表明基督那本乎信的義,這義如今在未受割禮之中,或說是在未受割禮之中生於他。又或者,另有一解:他的信是何等完全,以致配得一個印記;凡完備而偉大的事物總要被印上印記。「這義是在未受割禮之時。」如今是在那些從外邦人中相信的人身上。「使他作一切未受割禮而信之人的父。」
1:86
Ut omnes qui ex gentibus credunt, secundum fidem filii sint Abrahæ: dum et illis sola fides ad justiliam reputatur, etiam et ipsi circumcisi non carne, sed corde: sive quia ante circumcisionem justus esset præputiatorum pater justorum. Ut reputetur et illis ad justitiam, et sit pater cir. cumcisionis. Cum justificati fuerint, circumcisi sunt: quia præputiatus si justus est, praeputium ejus in circumcisione reputabitur. Modo enim signo non est opus, per quod ab hominibus cognoscatur. Non enim una gens est Dei, sed ex omnibus congregatio: quia jam venit exspectatio gentium Christus.
That all who believe from among the Gentiles may, according to faith, be sons of Abraham: since to them also faith alone is reckoned unto righteousness, and they too are circumcised, not in flesh but in heart; or because before circumcision he was righteous, the father of the righteous uncircumcised. 'That it might be reputed also to them for righteousness, and that he might be the father of the circumcision.' When they have been justified, they are circumcised: for if the uncircumcised man is righteous, his uncircumcision shall be reputed for circumcision. For now there is no need of the sign by which he might be known among men. For there is not one nation of God, but a gathering out of all: because now Christ, the expectation of the Gentiles, has come.
使一切從外邦人中相信的人,都可按著信作亞伯拉罕的子孫:因為在他們身上也是惟獨信算為義,他們也是受了割禮的——不是在肉身,乃是在心裡;或說因為在割禮之前他就是義的,作那未受割禮之義人的父。「使義也算為他們的,並且使他作受割禮之人的父。」當他們稱義之後,就是受了割禮的:因為未受割禮的人若是義的,他的未受割禮就算為受割禮。因為如今不再需要那使人在眾人中被認出的記號。因為神的子民不是一族,乃是從萬族中招聚而成:因為外邦人所盼望的基督如今已經來到。
1:87
Non his tantum qui sunt ex circumcisione fidele., sed et his qui sectantur vestigia fidei, quæ est in præputio patris nostri Abrahæ. Si illum imitantur. Non enim per legem. Non per legem, sed ante legem: quia in lege quidem de fide et promissione Abrahae creditum est: sed Moyses, qui scripsit legem, postea fuit. Deinde ipse ad Galatas dicit: Quia post quadringentos et triginta annos facta est lex quae non irritum facit ad evacuandam promissionem. Promissio Abrahæ, aut semini ejus, ut hæres esset mundi. Non per circumcisionem. Sed per justitiam fidei. Ut in semine Abrahæ, id est Chrisio, benedicerentur omnes gentes, cui datæ sunt a Patre gentes in hxreditatem;
Not to those only who are of the circumcision faithful, but also to those who follow the footsteps of the faith which our father Abraham had in uncircumcision — if they imitate him. 'For not through the law.' Not through the law, but before the law: because in the law indeed belief was given concerning the faith and promise of Abraham; but Moses, who wrote the law, came afterward. Then he himself says to the Galatians: 'That the law, which was made four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make void the promise.' 'Was the promise to Abraham, or to his seed, that he should be heir of the world.' Not through circumcision. 'But through the righteousness of faith.' That in the seed of Abraham, that is, in Christ, all nations might be blessed, to whom the nations were given by the Father for an inheritance;
這父不單作那出於割禮而有信心之人的父,也作那些跟隨我們祖宗亞伯拉罕未受割禮時之信心腳蹤之人的父——只要他們效法他。「因為不是藉著律法。」不是藉律法,乃是在律法之前:因為在律法中固然有人相信亞伯拉罕的信與應許;但寫律法的摩西是後來才有的。然後他自己對加拉太人說:「那四百三十年以後的律法,並不能廢掉,叫應許歸於虛空。」「神應許亞伯拉罕和他後裔,必得承受世界。」不是藉著割禮。「乃是因信而得的義。」使萬族在亞伯拉罕的後裔、就是基督裡蒙福,因父已將萬族賜給祂為產業;
1:88
sive ut curo eo requiescant gentes, sicut dicit Salvator: Venient ab Oriente et Occidente, et recumbent cum Abraham, et Isaac, et Jacob. Si enim qui ex lege hæredes sunt. Si ex circumcisione, secundum vos: si illi soli, ut vos vultis, liaeredes, non reddidit Deus Abrabae quod promisit per justitiam ut pater esset multarum gentium, et videtur sine causa credidisse. Sed non ita est: nam implevit Deus Abrahae promissionem, quia ex omni parte mundi gentes credunt in Cbristo. Exinanita est fides, abolita est promissio. Ergo nemo justificatur ex fide, nec ipse Abraham. SeU quoniam fides exinaniri non potest, nec promissio abolcri, superest ut non sit ex lege hæreditas, sed per justitiam fidei.
or that the nations may rest with Him, as the Saviour says: 'They shall come from the East and the West, and shall recline with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob.' 'For if they who are of the law be heirs.' If of the circumcision, according to you: if they alone, as you wish, are heirs, then God did not render to Abraham what He promised through righteousness, that he should be the father of many nations, and he seems to have believed without cause. But it is not so: for God fulfilled the promise to Abraham, because from every part of the world the nations believe in Christ. 'Faith is made void, the promise is abolished.' Therefore no one is justified by faith, not even Abraham himself. But since faith cannot be made void, nor the promise abolished, it remains that the inheritance is not of the law, but through the righteousness of faith.
或是使萬族與祂一同安息,正如救主所說:「從東從西,將有許多人來,與亞伯拉罕、以撒、雅各一同坐席。」「若是屬乎律法的人才得為後嗣。」若照你們所說是屬割禮的:他們若如你們所願是惟一的後嗣,那麼神就沒有藉著義向亞伯拉罕成就祂所應許的,使他作多族的父,他的相信似乎就是徒然。但事實並非如此:因為神向亞伯拉罕成就了應許,因為從世界各方的萬族都信基督。「信就歸於虛空,應許也就廢棄了。」那麼就沒有人因信稱義,連亞伯拉罕自己也沒有。但既然信不能歸於虛空,應許也不能廢棄,就剩下這一結論:產業不是本乎律法,乃是藉著信的義。
1:89
Lex enim peccata non donat, sed indicat Alias vinditat sive judicat]. Et ideo non potest filios facere Abrahae, quia secundum quod omnes sub peccato inventi sunt, omnes erant puniendi, Ideo ergo ex fide, ut dimissis per gratiam peccatis, fiant filii Abrahæ. Lex enim iram aperatur. Quae injustis est posita, quae magis gravavit peccantes, non absolvit, quia injustis est posita: in praesenti enim poenam transgressoribus inferebat. Lex enim quid aliud quam sola littera est eis qui eam legere noverunt, et implere non possunt? quæ talibus littera est, quia non est adjutrix legentium, sed testis peccantium.
For the law does not forgive sins, but points them out [otherwise: avenges or judges]. And therefore it cannot make sons of Abraham, because, inasmuch as all were found under sin, all were to be punished. Therefore it is of faith, that, sins being forgiven through grace, they may become sons of Abraham. 'For the law worketh wrath.' Which was laid down for the unrighteous, which rather burdened sinners, and did not absolve them, because it was laid down for the unrighteous: for in the present it inflicted punishment upon transgressors. For what else is the law but mere letter to those who know how to read it, and cannot fulfil it? For to such it is letter, because it is not a helper of readers, but a witness against sinners.
因為律法不赦免罪,只指出罪〔另一解:懲罰或審判罪〕。因此它不能使人作亞伯拉罕的子孫,因為既然眾人都被尋見在罪之下,眾人就都當受罰。所以是本乎信,好叫罪藉恩典得赦,使他們可作亞伯拉罕的子孫。「因為律法是惹動忿怒的。」律法是為不義之人設立的,它反而加重罪人的擔子,並不釋放他們,因為它是為不義之人設立的:因為它在今世向違犯者施行刑罰。因為對那些會讀卻不能遵行的人,律法豈不只是字句嗎?對這樣的人律法就是字句,因為它不是讀者的幫助,乃是罪人的見證。
1:90
Ideo quippe lex iram operatur, ut territo atque converso ad justitiam legis implendam Dei misericordia gratiam largiatur per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum, qui est Dei sapientia; de quo scriptum est: Legem et misericordiam in lingua portat. Legem, quæ terrcat, miscricordiam, qua subveniat. Cognitio itaque legis facit superbum praevaricatorem: per donum autem charitatis delectat legis esse factorem. Lex, inquit, iram operatur, hoc ideo, quia ira Dei major est in praevaricatorem, qui per legem cognoscit peccatum et tamen facit. Ubi enim non est lex. nec prævaricatio. Quae propter transgressionem posita est: ubi enim venit ex lege praeceptio, abundavit et praevaricationis occasio.
For this reason indeed the law worketh wrath, that, man being terrified and turned toward fulfilling the righteousness of the law, the mercy of God may bestow grace through Jesus Christ our Lord, who is the wisdom of God; of whom it is written: 'He carries the law and mercy upon His tongue.' The law, that it may terrify; mercy, whereby it may succour. And so the knowledge of the law makes the proud a transgressor; but through the gift of charity it delights one to be a doer of the law. The law, he says, worketh wrath — this is so because the wrath of God is greater against the transgressor, who through the law knows sin and yet commits it. 'For where there is no law, neither is there transgression.' Which was laid down on account of transgression: for where the precept came from the law, there also abounded the occasion of transgression.
正因如此,律法惹動忿怒,好使人受驚而轉向遵行律法的義,讓神的憐憫藉我們的主耶穌基督賜下恩典,祂就是神的智慧;論到祂,經上記著:「祂舌頭上帶著律法與憐憫。」律法是使人驚懼,憐憫是加以援助。如此,律法的知識使驕傲人成為違犯者;但藉愛心的恩賜,卻使人樂於作遵行律法的人。他說,律法惹動忿怒,這是因為神的忿怒對違犯者更大,這人藉律法知罪卻仍犯罪。「哪裡沒有律法,那裡就沒有過犯。」律法是因過犯而添設的:因為律法一有誡命臨到,過犯的機會也就增多了。
1:91
Ideo ex fide. Hæredes ex fide, non ex lege. Ut secundum gratiam. Diligenter adverte, quia secundum gratiam dixit, ut cesset praesumptio, quae sibi blanditur de meritis. Firma sit promissio omni semini. Non ei qui ex lege est solum, sed et ei qui ex fide est Abrahæ. Quia omnes gentes credunt, et completur promissio Abrahæ. Qui est pater omnium nostrum, sicut scriptum est. Pateret praeputiatorumet circuracisorum. Hoc loco ubi Abraham multarum gentium pater dicitur, Judæorum superbia confunditur, quia Judaeorum per carnem, gentium per fidem est pater. Quia patrem multarum gentium posui te ante Deum, cui credidisti. Quia per se nec unius filii poterat pater esse. Qui vivificat mortuos.
'Therefore it is of faith.' Heirs by faith, not by law. 'That it might be according to grace.' Diligently observe that he said 'according to grace,' so that presumption may cease, which flatters itself concerning merits. 'That the promise might be sure to all the seed.' Not to him only who is of the law, but also to him who is of the faith of Abraham. Because all the nations believe, and the promise to Abraham is fulfilled. 'Who is the father of us all, as it is written.' The father of both the uncircumcised and the circumcised. In this place, where Abraham is called the father of many nations, the pride of the Jews is confounded, because he is the father of the Jews by the flesh, of the Gentiles by faith. 'For I have made thee a father of many nations, before God, whom thou hast believed.' Because by himself he could not be the father even of one son. 'Who quickeneth the dead.'
「所以是本乎信。」是憑信作後嗣,不是憑律法。「叫這應許照著恩典。」你當殷勤察看,他說「照著恩典」,好使那憑功德自媚的自恃止息。「使應許定然歸給一切後裔。」不單歸給那屬律法的人,也歸給那有亞伯拉罕之信的人。因為萬族都相信,亞伯拉罕的應許就得成就。「亞伯拉罕所信的,是那位使死人復活的神。」在此處,亞伯拉罕被稱為多族的父,猶太人的驕傲就蒙羞,因為他按肉身是猶太人的父,按信是外邦人的父。「我已經立你作多族的父,這是在你所信的神面前。」因為他憑自己連一個兒子的父也不能作。「使死人復活的神。」
1:92
Ad generandum mortuos dicit, ut et praesertim Saram, ut praesertim clausæ conveniat: quia fructum sobolis, quem aetas non obtinuerat, fides perfecta promeruit. Et vocat ea quæ non sunt, tanquam ea quæ sunt. Quamvis in principio vocaverit ea quae non erant, et ad nutum jubentis statim esse coeperunt, tamen hic de filii desperata conceptione significat. Qui contra spem. Contra spem naturae erat ut vetula pareret, et semen suum sicut stellas coeli futurum: In spem credidit. In spe potentiae Dei. Ut fieret pater multarum gentium. Quia adhuc unius filii pater erat. Secundum quod dictum est: Sic trit semen tuum sicut atellæ coeli et arena maris.
He says 'to beget the dead,' that it may especially fit Sarah, that it may especially fit the barren woman: because the fruit of offspring, which age had not obtained, perfect faith deserved to obtain. 'And calleth those things that are not, as those that are.' Although in the beginning He called those things which were not, and at the beck of Him who commanded they at once began to be, yet here He signifies concerning the despaired-of conception of a son. 'Who against hope.' It was against the hope of nature that an old woman should bear, and that his seed should be as the stars of heaven: 'Believed in hope.' In hope of the power of God. 'That he might be made the father of many nations.' Because as yet he was the father of one son. 'According to that which was spoken: So shall thy seed be, as the stars of heaven and the sand of the sea.'
他說「使死人得以生育」,好使這話特別適用於撒拉,特別適用於那已閉塞不孕的婦人:因為那年紀所未能得的子嗣之果,完全的信卻配得著。「祂稱那無有的為有。」雖然起初祂稱那無有的,一經祂吩咐的旨意,它們立時就開始存在,然而在此祂是指那已被絕望的生子之孕。「他在無可指望的時候。」照本性的指望,一個老婦人生子、他的後裔要如天上的星,這是無可指望的:「因信仍有指望。」是指望神的大能。「就得以作多族的父。」因為他那時還只是一個兒子的父。「正如所說:你的後裔將要如此,如同天上的星、海邊的沙。」
1:93
Quia scientibus legem loquebatur Apostolus, in arena Judæos, in stellis gentes, quae credunt significavit: illos terrenos, istos coelestes intellige; quia etiam de ipso genere Judaeorum primitivorum Ecclesia, quae credidit, cœlo et stellis merito comparatur. Et non est infirmatus fide, nec consideravit corpus suum emortuum, cum fere centum annorum esset, et emortuam vulvam Saræ. Nihil naturae considerat fides: quia in his quæ promittit Deus, facile natura suo servit auctori. Quaeritur quomodo Abraham postea de Cethura filios generaverit, qui de Sara ante non potuit. Idcirco de Sara non genuit, quia anus erat et sterilis.
Because the Apostle was speaking to those who knew the law, by the sand he signified the Jews, by the stars the Gentiles who believe: understand the former as earthly, the latter as heavenly; because even from the very race of the Jews the primitive Church, which believed, is deservedly compared to heaven and the stars. 'And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was almost a hundred years old, nor the dead womb of Sarah.' Faith considers nothing of nature: because in those things which God promises, nature readily serves its author. It is asked how Abraham afterward begot sons of Keturah, who could not before beget of Sarah. He did not beget of Sarah for this reason, that she was old and barren.
因為使徒是對那些認識律法的人說話,他以沙比喻猶太人,以星比喻相信的外邦人:當明白前者是屬地的,後者是屬天的;因為甚至從猶太人的族類中相信了的初代教會,也理當比作天與星。「他將近百歲的時候,雖然想到自己的身體如同已死,撒拉的生育已經斷絕,他的信心還是不軟弱。」信不顧念本性的任何事:因為在神所應許的事上,本性甘願服事它的創造主。有人問,亞伯拉罕從前不能從撒拉生子,後來怎能從基土拉生兒子。他不從撒拉生子,是因她年老且不孕。
1:94
De illa vero quae in aetatis juventute posita erat, facile valuit procreari. In repromissione autem Dei non hæsitavit diffidentia, sed confortatus est fide, dans gloriam Deo. Nec de senectutis impossibilitate, nec de promissionis magnitudine dubitaviL: quia non ad annos suos, sed ad Omnipotentis promissa respexit, dans gloriam Deo, tanquam de percepto gratias agens. Plenissime sciens quia quæcunque promisitDeus,potens est et facere. Id est, certissime, Ips igitur fidem gentium facit, qui potens est facere quod promisit, Ipse ergo operatur in cordibus nostri fidem miro et ineffabili modo ut credamus. Ideo et reputatum est illi ad justitiam.
But from her who was set in the vigour of youth, he was easily able to procreate. 'And in the promise of God he did not hesitate with distrust, but was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God.' He doubted neither because of the impossibility of old age, nor because of the greatness of the promise: because he looked not to his own years, but to the promises of the Almighty, giving glory to God, as though giving thanks for what he had received. 'Most fully knowing that whatsoever God hath promised, He is able also to perform.' That is, most certainly. He therefore who is able to do what He promised produces the faith of the Gentiles. He therefore works faith in our hearts in a wonderful and ineffable manner, that we may believe. 'Therefore it was reputed to him unto righteousness.'
但從那正在青春年華的婦人,他就容易生育。「並且仰望神的應許,總沒有因不信而疑惑,反倒因信心裡得堅固,將榮耀歸給神。」他既不因老年的無能而疑惑,也不因應許的偉大而疑惑:因為他不看自己的年歲,只看那全能者的應許,將榮耀歸給神,彷彿為所領受的獻上感謝。「且滿心相信,神所應許的必能作成。」即確確實實。所以那位能作成祂所應許之事的,成就了外邦人的信。因此祂以奇妙難言的方式在我們心中運行使人相信,好叫我們相信。「所以這就算為他的義。」
1:95
Non est autem scriptum tantum propter ipsum, quia reputatum est illi. Quia si * credidit. Et aliter, Advertendum, quia apud Deum non solum devotio operis habet meritum, sed etiam firma et perfecta credulitas. Sed et propter nos,quibus reputabitur. Non ut sciremustantum qualis fuerit, sed ut nobis omnibus rexemplo sit, ut filiis pater: sicut omnia exempla sanctorum, sive tentationes, ut se ipsi scirent, et nos, eorum exempla sequeremur. Ideo tentantur sancti, ut ipsi se agnoscant: ideo probati justificantur, ut DOS eorum vesligia subsequamur. Credentibus in eum, qui suscitavit Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum a mortuis. Videamus quo ordine hoc loco ad Christi transierit resurrectionem:
'Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was reputed to him.' Because if he believed. And otherwise: It must be observed that with God not only the devotion of work has merit, but also firm and perfect belief. 'But also for us, unto whom it shall be reputed.' Not that we should know only what manner of man he was, but that he should be an example to us all, as a father to his sons: as are all the examples of the saints, or their temptations, that they themselves might know themselves, and we might follow their examples. Therefore the saints are tempted, that they may recognize themselves: therefore, being tested, they are justified, that we may follow their footsteps. 'To them that believe in Him who raised up Jesus Christ our Lord from the dead.' Let us see in what order in this place he has passed to the resurrection of Christ:
「算為他義的這句話,不是單為他寫的。」因為他若信了。又或者:當注意,在神看來不僅工作的虔誠有功德,堅定而完全的相信也有功德。「也是為我們寫的,這義必算為我們的。」不是叫我們只知道他是何等樣的人,乃是叫他作我們眾人的榜樣,如父作兒子的榜樣:正如眾聖徒一切的榜樣或試煉,為使他們自己並我們得以認識自己,並使我們效法他們的榜樣。所以聖徒受試煉,為要他們認識自己:所以他們既受了試驗就得稱義,好使我們跟隨他們的腳蹤。「就是我們信那叫我們的主耶穌基督從死裡復活的神。」讓我們看看他在此處是按怎樣的次序轉到基督的復活:
1:96
id est, et nobis reputabitur, si tam perfecte crediderimus Christum a mortuis resurrexisse, quomodo ille credidit corpus Saræ emortuum posse ad concipiendum vivificari. Qui traditus est propter delicta nostra. In traditione misericordia, in resurrectione potentia demonstrata est: et ut novae ex resurrectione vitæ, quae est justificatio nostra, nobis daretur exemplum; ut peccata nostra porlaret, mortuus est: resurrexit ut per resurrectionem suam gloriam nostræ justificationis ostenderet. Et resurrexit propter justificationem nostram. Ideo mortuus est, ut vitam mortuis redderet.
that is, it shall be reputed to us also, if we so perfectly believe that Christ rose from the dead, as he believed that the dead body of Sarah could be quickened to conceive. 'Who was delivered up for our offences.' In the delivering-up, mercy was shown; in the resurrection, power: and that an example of the new life from resurrection, which is our justification, might be given to us; that He might bear our sins, He died: He rose again, that through His resurrection He might show forth the glory of our justification. 'And rose again for our justification.' Therefore He died, that He might restore life to the dead.
就是說,這義也必算為我們的,只要我們如此完全地相信基督從死裡復活,正如他相信撒拉已死的身體能被復甦以致受孕。「耶穌被交給人,是為我們的過犯。」在被交付中顯出憐憫,在復活中顯出大能:並且好將復活之新生命的榜樣賜給我們,這新生命就是我們的稱義;為要擔當我們的罪,祂死了:祂又復活了,好藉祂的復活顯明我們稱義的榮耀。「復活是為叫我們稱義。」所以祂死了,好將生命還給死人。
1:97
Ideo in ipso corpore quo est crucifixus apparuir, ut fidem atque justitiam credentium confirmaret, cum in plenitudine promissionis fructum sive credulitatis agnosceret. CAP. v. Justificati igitur. Cum Judæi et gentes inter se disceptarent, et illi de antiquæ legis operibus, hi denova Christi vocatione præsumerent, pertractata causa quia nemo eorum est ex merito suo justificatus, sed omnes per gratiam, quae fidem infundit, et veritatem ostendit; et quod nec genus, nec circumcisio, sed fides faciat filios Abrahæ, qui ante circumcisionem ex sola credulitate justificatus est:
Therefore He appeared in that very body in which He was crucified, that He might confirm the faith and righteousness of believers, when in the fulness of the promise He might recognize the fruit of their belief. CHAPTER V. 'Being justified therefore.' When the Jews and Gentiles disputed among themselves — the former presuming upon the works of the ancient law, the latter upon the new calling of Christ — the case having been thoroughly examined, since none of them was justified by his own merit, but all by grace, which infuses faith and shows forth the truth; and since neither race nor circumcision, but faith makes sons of Abraham, who before circumcision was justified by belief alone:
所以祂在祂被釘十字架的那同一身體中顯現,好堅固信者的信與義,使祂在應許的豐滿中認出他們相信的果子。第五章。「我們既因信稱義。」當猶太人與外邦人彼此爭辯時——前者自恃古律法的行為,後者自恃基督新的呼召——這事既經徹底審察,既然他們無一是憑自己的功德稱義,乃都是憑恩典,這恩典注入信、彰顯真理;並且既然不是血統,也不是割禮,乃是信使人作亞伯拉罕的子孫,而亞伯拉罕在割禮之前就惟獨憑相信稱義了:
1:98
qua ratione conclusa pacem eos habere bortatur ad Deum, quia nemo suis meritis, sed omnes Dei gratia et misericordia sunt salvati. Ex fide. Quae ex Deo est, ut credamus; sicut et ad Galatas dicit: At ubi venit fides, jam non sumus sub pædagogo. Et ad Нebræos: Aspicientes in auctorem et consummatorem fidei Jesum Christum. Pacem habeamus ad Deum. Vel subjecti simus Deo: vel pacem Dei, non saeculi habeamus. Per Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum. Non ex operibus, per quem habemus accessum per fidem in gratiam istam. Per quem accessimus prope, qui eramus longe. In qua stamus. Quia ante gratiam jacebamos. Et gloriamur in spe gloriæ filiorum Dei.
— this reasoning being concluded, he exhorts them to have peace with God, because no one is saved by his own merits, but all by the grace and mercy of God. 'By faith.' Which is of God, that we should believe; as he also says to the Galatians: 'But after faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.' And to the Hebrews: 'Looking unto the author and finisher of faith, Jesus Christ.' 'Let us have peace with God.' Either let us be subject to God, or let us have the peace of God, not of the world. 'Through our Lord Jesus Christ.' Not by works, through whom we have access by faith into this grace. Through whom we, who were afar off, have come near. 'In which we stand.' Because before grace we lay prostrate. 'And we glory in the hope of the glory of the sons of God.'
——這論證既已作結,他就勸勉他們要與神和好,因為無人是憑自己的功德得救,乃都是憑神的恩典與憐憫。「因信。」這信是出於神,使我們相信;正如他對加拉太人所說:「但這信既然來到,我們從此就不在師傅的手下了。」又對希伯來人說:「仰望為我們信心創始成終的耶穌基督。」「我們就與神相和。」或是使我們服在神以下,或是使我們得著神的平安,而非世界的平安。「藉著我們的主耶穌基督。」不是憑行為,乃是藉著祂,我們因信得進入現在所站的這恩典中。藉著祂,我們這從前遠離的人如今得以親近。「我們現在所站的。」因為在恩典之前我們原是仆倒的。「並且歡歡喜喜盼望神眾子的榮耀。」
1:99
In hoc quod incredibile videtur, nos per fidem gloriamur liliorum Dei sperare nos adoptionem, tantumque est quod speramus, quantum ex se præsumere nullus anderet, quia in sola Dei virtute est, ut homo in filiorum Dei numero possit ascendere; ostendit et nos babere unde recte et sine periculo gioriemur. Magna enim gloria est per fidem ac spem in numero filiorum Dei adscisci. In spe gloria filiorum Dei illud nobis promittitur, quod, sicut dictum est, sperare nullus audebat: quod si forte in mentem alicujus incidisset, poterat aestimare se in blasphemiam incurrisse: quod adeo magnum est, ut a multis pro ipsa magnitudine incredibile videatur:
In that which seems incredible we glory through faith: that we, sons of God, hope for adoption; and so great is what we hope for that no one would dare presume it of himself, for it lies in the power of God alone that a man should be able to be raised into the number of the sons of God. He shows also that we have that in which we may rightly and without peril glory. For great is the glory to be enrolled through faith and hope among the number of the sons of God. In the hope of the glory of the sons of God there is promised to us that which, as has been said, no one dared to hope for; and if perchance it had fallen into anyone's mind, he might have supposed that he had fallen into blasphemy—so great is it that by many it seems, for its very greatness, to be incredible.
在那看似難以置信之事上,我們藉信德而誇耀:我們這些神的兒女,盼望得著兒子的名分。我們所盼望的是如此之大,以致無人敢憑己力妄想,因為唯獨在神的大能中,人才得以被提升,列入神眾子之數。他也指明,我們確有可以正當、無危險地誇耀的憑據。因為藉信與望被錄入神眾子之數,實在是極大的榮耀。在神眾子榮耀的盼望中,應許賜給我們那如前所說、無人敢盼望之事;倘若這念頭偶然臨到某人心中,他或會以為自己陷入了褻瀆。這事如此之大,以致許多人正因其偉大而視為難以置信。
1:100
eo quod speramus gloriam filiorum Dei nos consecuturos. Non solum autem, sed etiam gloriamur in tribulationibus. Ideo in tribulationibus gloriatur, quia per eas patientiæ virtus ostenditur, et de patientia fidei approbatio nascitur: spes vero de invicti animi probatione nutritur. Gloriantur ergo sancti de tolerantia tribulationis sine periculo vanitatis. Non solum enim in gloria spei, sed etiam in saluberrimis nobis tribulationibus gloriamur, scientes quantam habeat remunerationem, sicut ait Jacobus: Omne gaudium existimate, fratres mei, cum in tentationes varias incideritis. Et illud: Beatus vir qui suffert tentationem: quia cum probatus fuerit, accipiet coronam vitæ.
That is, because we hope to obtain the glory of the sons of God. And not only so, but we also glory in tribulations. Therefore one glories in tribulations, because through them the virtue of patience is displayed, and from patience is born the approval of faith; while hope is nourished by the proof of an unconquered spirit. The saints therefore glory in the endurance of tribulation without the danger of vanity. For not only in the glory of hope, but also in tribulations most healthful to us do we glory, knowing how great a recompense it holds, as James says: 'Count it all joy, my brethren, when you fall into diverse temptations.' And this: 'Blessed is the man who endures temptation, for when he has been proved, he shall receive the crown of life.'
就是說,因為我們盼望要得著神眾子的榮耀。不但如此,我們更在患難中歡歡喜喜。人之所以在患難中誇耀,乃因患難顯明忍耐的德行,而信心的驗證由忍耐而生;盼望則因不屈之心的試驗得著滋養。因此眾聖徒在忍受患難時誇耀,卻無虛榮之危險。因為我們不僅在盼望的榮耀中誇耀,也在那對我們極有益處的患難中誇耀,深知這患難帶有何等的賞賜,正如雅各所說:「我的弟兄們,你們落在百般試煉中,都要以為大喜樂。」又說:「忍受試探的人是有福的,因為他經過試驗以後,必得生命的冠冕。」
1:101
De tribulatione enim gloriosa permittitur nobis ut gloriemur: quod et si fecerimus, tale est quale si quis, nummo a>neo aut plumbeo contempto, gemmam regiam consequatur. Quanquam non sit digna comparatio: quia hic, quamvis pretium distet, manet tamen utriusque corruptio: ibi derogan parvis tnagna, et caducis succedunt alterna. Scientes quod tributatio. Sciri jam dicitur, quod firmissime creditur. Patientiam operatur. In tribulatione apparet patientia sive augetur. Optant fideles aliquid pati pro nomine Domini, ut acquirant de tribulatione finienda praemia sine fine mansura. Patientia butem probationem: probatio vero spem. Qui in omnibus patiens fuerit, probatus est.
For it is granted us to glory in glorious tribulation; and if we do so, it is as though someone, despising a coin of brass or lead, should obtain a royal gem—though the comparison is not worthy, for here, however the price differs, the corruption of both nevertheless remains, while there great things take the place of small, and enduring things succeed to fleeting ones. 'Knowing that tribulation'—it is now said to be known, because it is most firmly believed. 'Works patience'—in tribulation patience appears or is increased. The faithful desire to suffer something for the Lord's name, that from tribulation once ended they may acquire rewards that abide without end. 'And patience proof, and proof hope.' He who has been patient in all things is proved.
因為神許可我們在光榮的患難中誇耀;我們若如此行,就如同有人輕看銅錢或鉛錢,卻得著君王的寶石一般——雖然這比喻並不相稱,因為在此處,價值雖有差別,兩者的朽壞卻依然存留;而在那裡,大的取代了小的,永存的接替了短暫的。「知道患難」——如今說是「知道」,因為這是最堅定地相信的。「生忍耐」——在患難中忍耐得以顯明或增長。信徒願意為主的名受些苦楚,好從那將要止息的患難中,得著永不止息、長存的賞賜。「忍耐生老練,老練生盼望。」凡在萬事上有忍耐的,便是經過試驗的。
1:102
Vasa enim figuli probat fornax, et homines juslos tentatio tribulationis. Spes autem non confundit. Spes futurorum omnem confusionem expelHt praesentium, unde probatur non habere spem, qui praeceptis Christi contunditur. Quia charitas Dei. Quomodo nos Deus diligat ex hoc cognoscimus, quia non solum nobis per mortem Filii sui peccata dimisit, sed etiam donum in nobis sancti Spiritus contulit, qui purgat et illuminat occulta cordium, et jam nune revelat gloriam futurorum. Diffusa,est in cordibus no, stris per Spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. Magnitudo beneficiorum excitat in se magnitudinem charitatis, quæ perfecta timere non novit, neque confunditur:
For the furnace proves the potter's vessels, and the temptation of tribulation proves just men. 'But hope does not confound.' The hope of things to come drives out all the confusion of present things; whence he is proved not to have hope who is crushed by the precepts of Christ. 'Because the charity of God.' From this we know how greatly God loves us: that not only did He forgive us our sins through the death of His Son, but also bestowed upon us the gift of the Holy Spirit, who purges and illumines the hidden things of hearts and even now reveals the glory of things to come. 'Is poured forth in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who is given to us.' The greatness of the benefits stirs up in itself a greatness of charity, which, being perfect, knows not how to fear, nor is confounded.
因為窯爐試驗窯匠的器皿,患難的試探試驗義人。「盼望不至於羞愧。」對將來之事的盼望驅除了對現今之事一切的紛擾;由此可見,凡被基督的誡命所擊倒的人,便被證明是沒有盼望的。「因為神的慈愛。」由此我們知道神何等愛我們:祂不但藉祂兒子的死赦免了我們的罪,更將聖靈的恩賜賜給我們——這聖靈潔淨並光照人心中隱密之事,如今就顯明將來的榮耀。「藉著所賜給我們的聖靈,將神的愛澆灌在我們心裡。」這些恩惠的偉大,在自身激發出偉大的愛,這愛既是完全的,就不知懼怕,也不至羞愧。
1:103
quae tamen in nobis non per proprium meritum, sed per Spiritum sanctum donatur: quia ipsa charitas plenitudo legis esse cognoscitur. Et ideo nemo in se, sed in Deo, cujus donum est, glorietur nec dicat: Ego naturali legi credidi, et sic accepi Spiritum sanctum: quia nemo praevenit Deum, sed illius semper misericordia praevenimur. Utquid enim Christus cum adhuc infirmi essemus. Vult hinc ostendere, quia pro impiis mortuus est, et beneficiorum ejus magnitudinem commendare, ut indebite ab eo tantum dilecti, quantum eum diligere debeamus, videamus, aut si tam sancto et tanto beneficio aliquid praeponendum sit, cum ille nobis impiis nec vitam suam præposuerit, nec denegaverit mortem.
This charity, however, is given us not by our own merit, but through the Holy Spirit; for that very charity is known to be the fullness of the law. And therefore let no one glory in himself, but in God, whose gift it is; nor let him say, 'I believed by the natural law, and thus received the Holy Spirit'—for no one anticipates God, but we are always forestalled by His mercy. 'For why did Christ, while we were yet weak…'—He wishes here to show that He died for the ungodly, and to commend the greatness of His benefits: that we, so undeservedly loved by Him, may see how much we ought to love Him; or whether anything should be preferred to so holy and so great a benefit, since He preferred neither His own life to us ungodly ones, nor refused death.
然而這愛賜給我們,並非憑我們自己的功勞,乃是藉著聖靈;因為這愛正被認為是律法的成全。所以,誰也不可誇自己,只可誇那賜恩的神;也不可說:「我憑本性的律法而信,因而領受了聖靈」——因為無人能先於神,我們總是被祂的憐憫所先臨。「因我們還軟弱的時候,基督為何……」——他在此要顯明基督是為不敬虔的人死,並要彰顯祂恩惠的偉大:叫我們這被祂如此無功而蒙愛的人,看見自己當如何愛祂;或思想是否有甚麼當置於這如此聖潔、如此偉大的恩惠之上,因祂連自己的生命都不看得比我們這些不敬虔的人更重,也不拒絕受死。
1:104
Secundum tempus pro impiis mortuus est. Sive quia in ultimo saeculi passus est Christus, sive ad praesens, vel ad tridui tempus, ut praedicabatur, est mortuus. Qui ergo pro impiis mortuus est dicens, ostendit, quod pium Dominum usque ad mortem diligere debeamus, quem, pro impiis servis cruciatum mortis excepisse cognoscimus: simulque notandum, quod ait, pro impiis, ut praesumptio humana reprimatur, ne suis meritis aliquid tribuat. Vix enim pro justo quis moritur. Hoc contra Pelagium facit qui negat originale peccatum, quod si hominem non obligasset, mors Christi non fuisset necessaria.
'In due time He died for the ungodly.' Either because Christ suffered at the last age of the world, or for the present, or for the space of three days, as it was foretold, He died. He therefore who says that He died for the ungodly shows that we ought to love unto death the merciful Lord, whom we know to have undergone the torment of death for ungodly servants. And at the same time it is to be noted that he says 'for the ungodly,' so that human presumption may be restrained, lest it attribute anything to its own merits. 'For scarcely for a just man will one die.' This tells against Pelagius, who denies original sin; for if this had not bound man, the death of Christ would not have been necessary.
「祂在指定的時候為不敬虔的人死。」或因基督在世界的末後受苦,或就當時而言,或如所預言的、在三日之間死了。所以那說祂為不敬虔之人死的,是要顯明我們當愛這慈悲的主直到死地——我們知道祂為不敬虔的僕人受了死的痛苦。同時要注意他說「為不敬虔的人」,好抑制人的自恃,免得人將甚麼歸功於自己的功勞。「為義人死,是少有的。」這話駁斥了否認原罪的伯拉糾;因為原罪若未曾束縛人,基督的死就沒有必要了。
1:105
Dignum autem est ut homo pro confessione boni Domini vitam incunctanter effundat, qui non pro justis, sed pro impiis mortuus est, et vel sic de nobis præsumere desinamus. Nam si vix pro justo quis moritur, quis pro iniquo et impio, nisi ille qui venerat salvum facere quod perierat: cui nullus prior dedit, sed ab illo accepit, ut crederet? Nam pro bono forsitan quis audeat mori. Tam facile: nam bonum hoc est quod justum, secundum illud mandatum, justum et bonum. Commendat autem suam charitatem. Quando indebite aliquid redditur, tunc charitas commendatur. Quid ergo tam indebitum quam ut sine peccato Dominus pius pro servo impio moreretur Deus in nobis.
It is fitting, then, that a man should pour out his life without hesitation for the confession of the good Lord, who died not for the just but for the ungodly; and even so let us cease to presume upon ourselves. For if scarcely for a just man will one die, who would die for the wicked and ungodly, save He who had come to save that which was lost—to whom no one first gave, but who received from Him, that he might believe? 'For peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.' So readily; for the good is that which is just, according to that commandment, 'just and good.' 'But God commends His charity.' When something undue is rendered, then charity is commended. What then is so undue as that the merciful Lord, without sin, should die for an ungodly servant—God in us?
那麼,人為著承認良善的主,就當毫不遲疑地捨命,因祂不是為義人死,乃是為不敬虔的人死;即便如此,我們也當不再自恃。因為若為義人死尚且少有,誰肯為惡人、為不敬虔的人死呢?惟有那來拯救失喪之人的主才肯——無人先給了祂甚麼,人乃是從祂領受,才得以相信。「為仁人死,或者有敢做的。」如此輕易;因為仁善即是公義的,正如那誡命所說「公義又良善」。「惟有神將祂的慈愛顯明了。」當人得著不配得的賞賜時,愛就得以顯明。那麼還有甚麼比慈悲的主、無罪的神在我們裡面為不敬虔的僕人受死更不配得的呢?
1:106
Quantum nos diligat ex morte sua cognoscimus. Quoniam cum adhuc peccalores essemus, Christus pro nobis mortuus est. Multo igitur magis justificati nunc in sanguine ipsius, salvi erimus. Si peccatores tantum dilexit, quanto magis jam quos justos fecit custodiet? et si pro extraneis intercessit, multo magis suos perire non patitur. Si semetipsum dedit pro impio, quomodo sua poterit denegare? Non jam per animalium cruorem, sicut in lege; sed per sanguinem Filii Dei debitores esse nos admonet. Et ut intelligamus quantum diligat receptos, qui reconciliavit inimicos. Ab ira. Iram judicii. Per ipsum. Per ipsum salvabimur, non per nos: hoc est, si membrum ejus fuerimus:
How greatly He loves us we know from His death: 'For when we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, being now justified by His blood, shall we be saved.' If He so loved sinners, how much more will He guard those whom He has already made just? And if He interceded for strangers, much more does He not suffer His own to perish. If He gave Himself for the ungodly, how can He deny what is His own? Not now through the blood of animals, as in the law, but through the blood of the Son of God does He admonish us that we are debtors. And that we may understand how greatly He loves those received back, who reconciled His enemies. 'From wrath'—the wrath of judgment. 'Through Him'—through Him we shall be saved, not through ourselves; that is, if we shall have been His member.
我們從祂的死認識祂何等愛我們:「因我們還作罪人的時候,基督為我們死。現在我們既靠著祂的血稱義,就更要藉著祂免去神的忿怒。」祂若這樣愛罪人,何況那些祂已使之成義的人,豈不更加看顧嗎?祂既為外人代求,何況祂自己的人,祂豈容他們滅亡?祂既為不敬虔的人捨了自己,又怎能拒絕賜下屬祂自己的呢?如今不是像律法下藉牲畜的血,乃是藉神兒子的血,警戒我們是欠債的。並要我們明白祂何等愛那被領回的人——祂使仇敵與祂和好。「免去忿怒」——就是審判的忿怒。「藉著祂」——我們要藉著祂得救,不是藉著自己;就是說,我們若成為祂的肢體。
1:107
cum enim omnia ardebunt, solum cor. pus salvabitur judicantis. Si enim cum inimici essemus. lnimici eramus ante donum gratiae ipsius, et ante baptismi sacramentum; sed et illi inimici esse noscuntur, qui post baptismum fiagitiis et sceleribus se involvunt, nec poenitentia volunt emendare errores, sicut dicit Jacobus: Amicitia hujus mundi inimicitia est Dei. Inimici ergo non natura, sed contraria voluntate. Reconciliati sumus. Quia alienati et inimici facti fueramusper transgressionem. Nemo enim reconciliatur, nisi ex inimicitiis. Inimicos autem nos primi parentis transgressio fecit. Per mortem Filii ejus: multo magis reconciliati salui crimus in vita ipsius.
For when all things shall burn, only the body of the Judge shall be saved. 'For if, when we were enemies…' We were enemies before the gift of His grace and before the sacrament of baptism; but those also are known to be enemies who, after baptism, entangle themselves in disgraceful deeds and crimes and will not amend their errors by penitence, as James says: 'The friendship of this world is enmity with God.' Enemies, therefore, not by nature but by a contrary will. 'We were reconciled'—because we had been made estranged and enemies through transgression. For no one is reconciled except from a state of enmity; and it was the transgression of the first parent that made us enemies. 'Through the death of His Son: much more, being reconciled, shall we be saved in His life.'
因為當萬物被焚燒的時候,惟有審判者的身體得以存留。「因為我們作仇敵的時候……」我們在祂恩典的賞賜之前、在洗禮的聖事之前,原是仇敵;但那些在受洗之後仍陷入可恥行為與罪惡、不肯藉悔改改正過犯的人,也算是仇敵,正如雅各所說:「與世俗為友,就是與神為敵。」所以是仇敵,不是按本性,乃是因相反的意志。「我們與神和好」——因我們曾因過犯成為疏遠的、成為仇敵。因為除非從仇敵的地位,無人得以和好;而使我們成為仇敵的,正是始祖的過犯。「藉著神兒子的死;既已和好,就更要因祂的生得救。」
1:108
Si per mortem Christi salvati sumus, quanto magis in vita ipsius glorificabimur, si et vitam ejus imitemur et mortem, et in præceptorum ejus adjulorioipsius studuerimus permanere custodia. Non solum autem, sed et gloriamur in Deo. Non solum nobis vita dabitur Christi in illa. resurrectionis immutatione, sed et gloria, sicut dicit Joannes Apostolus: Nondum apparuit quid erimus: scimus quoniam cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus. Per Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum. Ut per ipsius gratiam similitudinem ejus mereamur, et simus in gloria Dei Patris. Per quem nunc reconcitiationem accepimus. Nunc reconciliationem, tunc gloriam. Propterea sicut per unum hominem in hunc mundum.
If we have been saved through the death of Christ, how much more shall we be glorified in His life, if we imitate both His life and His death, and strive by the help of His precepts to persevere in their keeping. 'And not only so, but we also glory in God.' Not only shall the life of Christ be given us in that transformation of the resurrection, but glory also, as the Apostle John says: 'It has not yet appeared what we shall be; we know that when He shall appear, we shall be like Him.' 'Through our Lord Jesus Christ'—that through His grace we may merit His likeness, and be in the glory of God the Father. 'Through whom we have now received reconciliation.' Now reconciliation, then glory. 'Therefore, as by one man into this world…'
我們若藉基督的死得救,何況我們若效法祂的生與死,並藉祂誡命的幫助努力持守遵行,豈不更要在祂的生命中得榮耀嗎?「不但如此,我們既藉著主,也就藉著神歡喜。」不僅在復活的變化中賜給我們基督的生命,也賜給榮耀,正如使徒約翰所說:「我們將來如何,還未顯明;但我們知道主若顯現,我們必要像祂。」「藉著我們的主耶穌基督」——好叫我們藉祂的恩典配得祂的形像,得以在父神的榮耀中。「我們又藉著祂得與神和好。」如今是和好,那時是榮耀。「所以,正如罪是從一人入了世界……」
1:109
Hinc ostendere vult propterea Christum passum, ut qui a Deo per Adam discesseramus, per Christum reconciliaremur. Peccalumintravit. Traduce etexemplo; quomodo enim cum non esset peccatum, per Adam advenit, ita et cum jam apud nullum esset justitia, per Christum revocata est; et quomodo per illius peccatum mors, ita per hujus justiliam vita. Et per peccatum. In hoc loco contra abruplum Pelagianæ impietatis errorem mortem studet ostendere non a Deo factam, sed per culpam transgressionis illatam: quia sicut per primi Adæ peccatum salus amissa est, ita per secundi justitiam reparata est. Hic Apostolus hoc intendit asserere, quia magna fuit Adae transgressio, sed ditior est Christi redemptio;
Hence he wishes to show that Christ suffered for this reason: that we who had departed from God through Adam might be reconciled through Christ. 'Sin entered'—by propagation and by example; for as, when there was no sin, it came through Adam, so too, when justice was with no one, it was recalled through Christ; and as through his sin came death, so through His justice came life. 'And through sin.' In this place, against the reckless error of Pelagian impiety, he strives to show that death was not made by God, but was brought in through the fault of transgression; because as through the sin of the first Adam salvation was lost, so through the justice of the second it was restored. Here the Apostle intends to assert that great was Adam's transgression, but richer is Christ's redemption.
由此他要顯明,基督之所以受苦,正是為此:叫我們這些因亞當離棄神的人,得以藉基督與神和好。「罪入了世界」——藉繁衍與榜樣;因為正如罪本不存在時,卻藉亞當而來,照樣,義本無人擁有時,卻藉基督被召回;正如因他的罪有了死,照樣因祂的義有了生命。「藉著罪」——在此處,他為駁斥伯拉糾派邪惡的荒謬謬誤,力證死不是神所造的,乃是藉過犯之罪咎帶進來的;因為正如藉頭一個亞當的罪,救恩喪失了,照樣藉第二個亞當的義,救恩得以恢復。使徒在此要斷言:亞當的過犯固然重大,但基督的救贖更為豐盛。
1:110
et inde dixit: Et non sicut per unum hominem peccatum, ita et donum. Ex uno peccato ille intulit mortem: hic ex multorum abolitione reddidit vitam. Et ideo plus prævaluit justitia in vivificando, quam peccatum in occidendo. Mors. Illa de qua dicit: Cum mortui essetis in peccatis, convivificavit vos Christo. Mors a morsu serpentis nomen accepit. Et ita. Quomodo in illo. In omnes homines mors pertransiit. Mors tam animæ quam corporis pertransit ex originali peccato et in Abraham, et in Isaac, et in Jacob, sed Dei sunt vivificati gratia, de quibus dicitur: Non est Deus mortuorum; sicut et Apostolus dicit etiam in eos qui non peccaverunt:
And therefore he said: 'And not as by one man's sin, so also is the gift.' From one sin the former brought in death; from the abolition of many the latter restored life. And so justice prevailed more in giving life than sin in slaying. 'Death'—that of which he says, 'When you were dead in sins, He made you live together with Christ.' Death received its name from the bite of the serpent. 'And so'—as in him. 'Death passed upon all men.' Death, both of soul and of body, passed from original sin even upon Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob; yet they are made alive by the grace of God, of whom it is said, 'He is not the God of the dead'; as the Apostle also says, even upon those who did not sin.
因此他說:「不像罪是因一人而來,恩賜也是如此。」前者從一次罪過帶進了死;後者從除滅眾多罪過恢復了生命。如此,義在賜生命上勝過罪在殺害上。「死」——就是他所說的:「你們死在罪中,神叫你們與基督一同活過來。」死是從蛇的咬傷得了這名。「照樣」——如在他裡面。「死就臨到眾人。」死,無論是靈魂的或是身體的,都從原罪臨到亞伯拉罕、以撒、雅各;然而他們卻因神的恩典得了生命,論到他們有話說:「神不是死人的神」;正如使徒也說,甚至臨到那沒有犯罪的人。
1:111
id esi, capitale peccatum sic in homines pertransiit, quia non solum ille mortuus est qui transgressus est, sed etiam illi qui ex transgressoribus sunt procreati, per naturae vinculum tenentur obnoxii, id est per omnes ramos vitium suum radix corrupta transmisit. Adam occidit, Christus vivificavit. In quo omnes peccaverunt. Sive peccato inobedientiæ, sive in Adam omnium peccantium poena præmonstrata est. Usque ad legem enim peccatum erat in mundo. Requirendum est quod peccatum: id est, illud solum peccatum usque ad legem viguit, quod praevaricatio primi parentis invexit. Ces. sabat enim transgressiunis delictum ante legis adventum.
That is, capital sin so passed upon men that not only did he die who transgressed, but also those who were begotten of transgressors are held liable through the bond of nature; that is, through all its branches the corrupted root transmitted its vice. Adam slew, Christ made alive. 'In whom all have sinned.' Either by the sin of disobedience, or in Adam the punishment of all who sin was foreshown. 'For until the law sin was in the world.' It must be asked what sin: that is, that sin alone was in force until the law which the prevarication of the first parent brought in; for the offense of transgression ceased before the coming of the law.
就是說,那要命的罪如此臨到眾人,以致不僅那犯過犯的人死了,連那些從犯過犯者所生的人,也因本性的連繫被算為有罪;就是說,那敗壞的根藉著它一切的枝子,傳遞了自己的敗壞。亞當殺死,基督使活。「因為眾人都犯了罪。」或藉悖逆之罪,或在亞當裡預先顯明了一切犯罪之人所受的刑罰。「沒有律法之先,罪已經在世上。」須追問是甚麼罪:就是說,直到律法之時,惟有始祖的過犯所帶進的那罪存留有效;因為在律法來到之前,過犯的罪責是止息的。
1:112
In primo saeculo peccatores libertate praesentis vitae securius fruebantur. Erat quidem ante legem ex operatione peccatum, sed non ita imputabatur, quia jam pene obiitterata fuerat scientia naturalis, cujus intellectus quasi mortuus revixit ex lege. Lex vindex peccati advenit. Peccattun autem non imputabatur, cum lex non esset. Erat: sed agrestibus hominibus non imputabatur, nec ab aliis credebatur esse peccatum. Sed regnavit mors ab Adam usque ad Moysen. Id est, mors ex originali malo veniens usque ad legem sola regnavit. Ideo dixit: Regnavit, quia totum mundum generaliler occupaverat. Alia vero peccata nequaquam regnare videbantur, quia non per universos generaliter regnabat iniquitas.
In the first age sinners enjoyed the liberty of the present life more securely. There was indeed sin before the law, from doing, but it was not so imputed, because the natural knowledge had already been almost blotted out, whose understanding, as though dead, revived through the law. The law came as the avenger of sin. 'But sin was not imputed, when there was no law.' It existed, but to rustic men it was not imputed, nor was it believed by others to be sin. 'But death reigned from Adam until Moses.' That is, death coming from the original evil reigned alone until the law. Therefore he said 'reigned,' because it had seized the whole world generally. Other sins by no means seemed to reign, because iniquity did not reign generally over all men.
在起初的世代,罪人更安然享受現今生命的自由。律法以前固然有出於行為的罪,卻不那樣算為罪,因為本性的知識已幾乎被塗抹,其悟性彷彿已死,卻藉律法復活了。律法乃是作為罪的刑罰者而來。「沒有律法,罪也不算罪。」罪雖存在,但對粗野的人卻不算為罪,別人也不以為那是罪。「然而死從亞當作王直到摩西。」就是說,從原初的惡而來的死,獨自作王直到律法。所以他說「作王」,因為死普遍地佔據了全世界。其他的罪卻絲毫不見作王,因為不義並未普遍地在眾人身上作王。
1:113
Naturalis enim aliquantula justitia vigebat in plurimis, sicut in multis philosophis: et caetera delicta quamvis ex vitiata natura, tamen voluntaria erant. Secutum est aliud novum, id est praevaricationis contempta lege delictum. Ergo obligatio sola primi hominis usque ad Moysen per se mortem operata regnavit. A legis autem tempore gei nus aliud delictorum in reatum neglectae legis accessit, quod ante ejus promulgationem non poterat imputari. Ac sic introeuntibus novis præceptis iniquitas multiplicata est. Lex enim non ut tolleret peccatum, sed ut demonstraret, vel judicaret, advenit:
For some measure of natural justice flourished in very many, as in many philosophers; and the other faults, though springing from a corrupted nature, were nevertheless voluntary. There followed another new thing—namely, the offense of prevarication when the law was despised. Therefore the obligation of the first man alone reigned by itself, working death until Moses. But from the time of the law another kind of offenses was added, unto the guilt of the neglected law, which before its promulgation could not be imputed. And thus, as new precepts entered in, iniquity was multiplied. For the law came, not that it might take away sin, but that it might display or judge it.
因為某種程度的本性之義在極多人身上興盛,如在許多哲學家身上;而其他的過失,雖出於敗壞的本性,卻仍是出於自願的。隨後又有一件新事——就是律法被藐視時的過犯之罪。所以惟有頭一個人的罪債獨自作王,自行運行死亡,直到摩西。但從律法的時候起,又加上另一類的過犯,歸入輕忽律法的罪咎,這是在律法頒布之前所不能算為罪的。這樣,隨著新誡命進入,不義就增多了。因為律法來到,不是要除去罪,乃是要顯明或審判罪。
1:114
et ideo hic abundantiam gratiæ Apostoli doctrina commendat, quia non tantum Adae debitum, quod solum usque ad legem, velut tyrannica dominationc regnaverat; sed etiam innumeras offensas prævaricationis et reprobae conversationis Redemptoris bonitas redonavit. Propterea dixit: Nam judicium quidem ex uno in condemnationem. Quod autem dicit: usque ad Moysen, id est usque ad finem legis et initium gratiæ debitum naturale regnavit: sicut dicimus, verbi gratia: Fuerunt Hunni usque ad Auilam. Non utique principium regni ejus, sed finem designamus: sic et usque ad Moysen, id est usque ad finem legis, et principium gratiae.
And therefore here the Apostle's teaching commends the abundance of grace, because the Redeemer's goodness pardoned not only Adam's debt, which alone had reigned until the law as with a tyrannical dominion, but also the innumerable offenses of prevarication and of reprobate conduct. For this reason he said, 'For judgment indeed was by one unto condemnation.' But what he says, 'until Moses,' that is, until the end of the law and the beginning of grace, the natural debt reigned; just as we say, for example, 'The Huns lasted until Attila'—by which we designate not the beginning of his reign but its end; so also 'until Moses,' that is, until the end of the law and the beginning of grace.
因此使徒的教訓在此稱揚恩典的豐盛,因為救贖主的良善所赦免的,不僅是亞當的罪債——那罪債獨自像暴君的統治一般作王直到律法——更赦免了過犯與敗壞行為那無數的冒犯。為此他說:「因一次的過犯,審判就定罪。」但他所說「直到摩西」,就是說直到律法的終結與恩典的開端,那本性的罪債作了王;正如我們舉例說:「匈奴人存續直到阿提拉」——我們藉此所指的不是他統治的開端,乃是其終結;照樣「直到摩西」,就是說直到律法的終結與恩典的開端。
1:115
Reliqua delicta, quæ non intelligebantur peccata esse usque ad principium legis, quousque diceret lex: Non concupisces, per legem revixerunt. Nam originale hodieque usque ad baptismum regnat, scd fenoris sui perdidit usum, postquam Christi sanguis chirographum originale delevit. Sed dicet aliquis: Quare adhuc in multis gentibus regnat originis malum? Cui respondet: Tunc vere pestis late diffusa regnabat, quando medicus deerat, quando mortalitas generalis omnes vastabat. Ubi vero portam paradisi remissio de cælis missa patefacit, mors perdidit potestatem: ac sic non regnat, quia regnum ejus destructum est per gratiam Christi.
The remaining offenses, which were not understood to be sins until the beginning of the law—until the law should say, 'You shall not covet'—revived through the law. For original sin reigns even today until baptism, but it has lost the use of its usury since the blood of Christ blotted out the original bond. But someone will say: Why does the evil of origin still reign in many nations? To whom he replies: Then indeed the plague, widely diffused, reigned, when the physician was absent, when the general mortality laid all waste. But where remission, sent from heaven, opened the gate of paradise, death lost its power; and thus it does not reign, because its kingdom has been destroyed through the grace of Christ.
其餘的過犯,在律法開始之前並不被認為是罪——直到律法說「不可貪心」——才藉律法復活過來。因為原罪至今仍作王,直到洗禮;但自從基督的血塗抹了那原初的欠據,原罪便失去了收取利息的效力。但有人要說:為何原罪之惡在許多外邦中仍然作王?他回答說:那時瘟疫廣泛蔓延、大肆作王,正是在醫生缺席、普世的死亡毀滅眾人之時。但當那從天上差來的赦免打開樂園之門時,死便喪失了權勢;如此它便不再作王,因它的國度已藉基督的恩典被毀滅了。
1:116
Etiam in eos qui non peccaverunt, in similitudinem prævaricationis Adæ, qui est forma futuri. Forma futuri, forma e contrario; quomodo ille peccati, ita hic justitiæ: sive ille in anima vivente, iste in spiritu vivificante. Christi forma Adam fuit: quia sicut Adam sine commercio conjugali Dei manibus est factus, ita et Christus ex virsine. Deo operante, processit. Sed non sicut delictum, ita et donum. Si enim unius deiicio multi mortui sunt: multo magis gratia Dei, et donum in gratia unius hominis Jesu Christi in plures abundavit. Et non sicut per unum peccatum, ita et donum. Id est, plus praevaluit justitia in vivificando, quam peccatum in occidendo:
'Even upon those who did not sin after the similitude of the transgression of Adam, who is the figure of Him that was to come.' A figure of Him that was to come—a figure by contrast: as the one was a figure of sin, so this One of justice; or the one in a living soul, this One in a life-giving spirit. Adam was a figure of Christ: because as Adam was made by the hands of God without conjugal intercourse, so also Christ, God working, came forth from a virgin. 'But not as the offense, so also the gift. For if by the offense of one many died, much more the grace of God and the gift, in the grace of the one man Jesus Christ, has abounded unto many.' 'And not as by one sin, so also the gift'—that is, justice prevailed more in giving life than sin in slaying.
「就是那些不與亞當犯一樣罪過的人。亞當乃是那將來要來之人的預像。」是那將來者的預像——是相對的預像:如那一位是罪的預像,這一位便是義的預像;或那一位在有生命的魂裡,這一位在賜生命的靈裡。亞當是基督的預像:因為正如亞當非藉夫妻之合、乃由神的手所造,照樣基督也由童貞女、藉神的運行而出。「只是過犯不如恩賜。若因一人的過犯,眾人都死了;何況神的恩典,與那因耶穌基督一人恩典中的賞賜,豈不更加倍地臨到眾人嗎?」「這恩賜也不如罪是因一人而來」——就是說,義在賜生命上勝過罪在殺害上。
1:117
quia Adæ peccatum et se et suos posteros interfecit: Christus autem et quos in corpore invenit, et suum hominem, et posteros salvavit. Sed forte dicit aliquis: Caro, quae ex transgressore venit, juste trahit origioale peccatum; anima vero, quæ inuocens nascitur, unde trahit originale peccatum, ut si non baptizatus infans moriatur, in aeternum damnetur? Audiat et agnoscat quia magis anima primum in Adam pro appetitu divinitatis tuam caro peccavit. Isto vero loco omnino cavenda est opinio quæ dicit: Sicut caro ex carne Adæ, ita anima nostra ex anima Adæ occulta Dei operatione creatur. Sicut quidam dixit:
For Adam's sin slew both himself and his posterity; but Christ saved both those whom He found in the body, and His own manhood, and His posterity. But perhaps someone says: The flesh, which comes from the transgressor, justly draws original sin; but the soul, which is born innocent—whence does it draw original sin, so that if an unbaptized infant dies, it is damned forever? Let him hear and acknowledge that the soul rather sinned first in Adam, through the appetite of divinity, than the flesh. But in this place the opinion is altogether to be avoided which says: As the flesh comes from the flesh of Adam, so our soul is created from the soul of Adam by the hidden working of God. As a certain one said:
因為亞當的罪殺了他自己和他的後裔;但基督卻拯救了祂在肉身中所遇見的人、祂自己的人性、以及祂的後裔。但或許有人說:那從犯過犯者而來的肉體,理當承受原罪;然而那生來無辜的靈魂,是從何處承受原罪,以致未受洗的嬰孩若死了,就要永遠受咒詛呢?願他聽見並承認:靈魂反倒在亞當裡因貪求神性而先犯了罪,過於肉體。但在此處,那種說法斷然當避免,就是說:正如肉體出於亞當的肉體,我們的靈魂也藉神隱秘的運行由亞當的靈魂而造。正如某人所說:
1:118
Lege latenti fundet opus natura suum, quae nisi hic fuerit liberata per gratiam, perpetua poena in aeternum damnabitur. Nam judicium. Subauditur mortis. Ex uno in condemnationem. Subauditur, peccante sive peccato primum. Gratia autem ex multis delictis in justificationem. Ac si prima obligatioveteris offensæ usque ad Christum dominata est. Alia vero delicta ante interdictum legis non videbantur vel non intelligebantur esse tam gravia: adveniens ergo gratia, non solum origioale debitum, sed et actuale donavit per baptismum. Et ideo ex multis delictis justificavit. Si enim unius delicto mars regnavit per unum. Id est per Adæ transgressionem. Multo magis abundantiam gratiæ.
'By a hidden law nature pours forth its own work'—which, unless it be here freed by grace, shall be damned with perpetual punishment forever. 'For the judgment'—understand, of death. 'By one unto condemnation'—understand, the first man sinning, or the first sin. 'But grace, from many offenses, unto justification.' As though the first obligation of the old offense held dominion until Christ. But the other offenses before the prohibition of the law were not seen, or were not understood, to be so grave: therefore grace, coming, forgave through baptism not only the original debt but also the actual. And therefore from many offenses it justified. 'For if by one man's offense death reigned through one'—that is, through Adam's transgression—'much more the abundance of grace.'
「本性藉隱秘的律法傾流出自己的工作」——這本性若不在此被恩典釋放,就要以永遠的刑罰被咒詛到永遠。「因為審判」——當理解為死的審判。「因一人受咒詛」——當理解為那頭一個人犯罪,或那頭一次的罪。「但恩典乃是由許多過犯得稱義。」彷彿那舊過犯的頭一項罪債,統管直到基督。但律法禁令之前的其他過犯,卻不被看為、或不被認為是這樣嚴重的:所以恩典來到,藉洗禮不但赦免了那原初的罪債,也赦免了本身所犯的罪。因此,祂從許多過犯中使人稱義。「若因一人的過犯,死就因這一人作了王」——就是說藉亞當的過犯——「何況那洪恩……」
1:119
Major estredemptio Salvatoris quam perdilio transgressoris: quia per Christum omnia peccata dimissa sunt, non solum originalia, verum etiam et actualia. Et donationis, et justitiæ accipientes in vitam regnabunt per unum Jesum Chritum. Quia et ut juste vivamus, et ut cum ipso regnemus, muneris ipsius largitate donatum est. Donationes audimus: de nostris meritis taceamus. Igitur sicut per unius delictum in omnes homines in condemnationem, sic et per unius justitiam in omnes homines in justificationem vitæ. Mors regnavit, subaudiendum. Qui ergo ex hac condemnatione liberatur, gratiam diligat; qui non liberatur, debitum agnoscat. Si in remittendo debito bonitas, in exigendo æquitas intelligitur:
Greater is the redemption of the Saviour than the perdition of the transgressor: because through Christ all sins have been remitted, not only original but also actual. 'And those who receive of the gift and of justice shall reign in life through one, Jesus Christ.' Because both that we may live justly and that we may reign with Him, has been granted by the bounty of His gift. Let us hear of the gifts; of our own merits let us be silent. 'Therefore as by the offense of one unto all men to condemnation, so also by the justice of one unto all men to justification of life.' 'Death reigned'—understood. He therefore who is freed from this condemnation, let him love grace; he who is not freed, let him acknowledge the debt. If in remitting the debt goodness is understood, in exacting it equity.
救主的救贖大過犯過犯者的敗壞:因為藉基督,一切的罪都得赦免,不僅是原罪,也包括本身所犯的罪。「那些領受洪恩又蒙所賜之義的,就必藉著耶穌基督一人在生命中作王。」因為我們得以公義地活,並得以與祂一同作王,都是祂恩賜的慷慨所賜。願我們聽論恩賜;至於我們自己的功勞,願我們緘默。「所以因一人的過犯,眾人都被定罪;照樣,因一人的義行,眾人也就被稱義得生命。」「死作了王」——當如此領會。所以凡從這定罪中得釋放的,就當愛恩典;凡未得釋放的,就當承認自己的罪債。若在赦免罪債上顯出良善,在追討罪債上便顯出公平。
1:120
nusquam enim esse apud Deum iniquitas invenitur. Sicut enim per inobedientiam unius hominis peccatores constituti sunt multi, ita et per unius obeditionem justi constituuntur multi. Sicut exemplo inobedientiae Adae peccaverunt multi, ita et Christi obelitione justilicantur muli. Grande crimen inobedientiae, quam qui habuerit Christianus, quodcunque boni fecerii evacuat. Obedientiam, inquit, malo quam sacrificium. Lex autem subintravit, ut abundaret delictum. Ne dicerent nobis: Lex peccata dimisit: Non, inquit, venit dimittere, sed monstrare: qua contempta, incœpit abundare delictum per scientiam: quasi diceret: Ut video, lex peccata non minuit, sed adjecit, non tamen suo vitio, sed illorum.
For nowhere is iniquity found with God. 'For as by the disobedience of one man many were made sinners, so also by the obedience of one shall many be made just.' As by the example of Adam's disobedience many sinned, so also by the obedience of Christ many are justified. Great is the crime of disobedience, which whatever Christian shall have, it empties out whatever good he shall have done. 'Obedience,' He says, 'I desire rather than sacrifice.' 'But the law entered in, that the offense might abound.' Lest they should say to us: The law remitted sins. 'It came not,' he says, 'to remit, but to display'; and when it was despised, the offense began to abound through knowledge—as though he should say: As I see, the law did not lessen sins but added to them, yet not by its own fault, but by theirs.
因為在神那裡絕找不著不義。「因一人的悖逆,眾人成為罪人;照樣,因一人的順從,眾人也成為義了。」正如因亞當悖逆的榜樣許多人犯了罪,照樣因基督的順從許多人得稱義。悖逆之罪極大,基督徒無論誰有了這罪,便抵消了他所行的一切善事。祂說:「我喜愛順從,不喜愛祭祀。」「律法本是外添的,叫過犯顯多。」免得他們對我們說:律法赦免了罪。他說:「律法來,不是為赦免,乃是為顯明」;律法既被藐視,過犯就藉知識開始顯多——彷彿他說:據我看來,律法並未減少罪,反倒加增了罪,然而不是因律法的過錯,乃是因人的過錯。
1:121
Lex, inquit, subintravit, ut abundaret delictum: quod supervenientis I gratiae largitate vacuatum est. Aperte ergo ex hoc testimonio advertimus, Apostolum de duobus loqui generibus peccatorum, quae vel ex naturali legis transgressione veniebant, ubi causam explicuit naturalem, legalem subdidit, dicens: Ubi abundavit peccatum, superabundavit gratia. Ubi autem abundavit peccatum Totus hic sensus est: Vetus Adam per unum delictum intulit mortem; novus Adam ex innumerabilium delictorum indulgentia donavit salutem. Ubi, inquit, abundavit peccatum: quia accepta lege peccatum non cum ignorantia, sed cum scientia perpetratur. Ideo incipit abundare delictum. Superabundavit gratia.
'The law,' he says, 'entered in, that the offense might abound'—which was emptied out by the bounty of the grace that came upon it. Openly, then, from this testimony we perceive that the Apostle speaks of two kinds of sins, which came either from natural or from legal transgression; where, having explained the natural cause, he added the legal, saying: 'Where sin abounded, grace did more abound.' 'But where sin abounded'—the whole sense is this: The old Adam by one offense brought in death; the new Adam, from the indulgence of innumerable offenses, gave salvation. 'Where,' he says, 'sin abounded'—because, the law having been received, sin is perpetrated not with ignorance but with knowledge. Therefore the offense begins to abound. 'Grace did more abound.'
他說:「律法本是外添的,叫過犯顯多」——這過犯卻被那臨到其上的恩典之豐盛所抵消。那麼,從這見證我們清楚看出,使徒論到兩類的罪,就是或出於本性、或出於律法之過犯的罪;他在解釋了本性方面的緣由之後,加上律法方面的,說:「罪在哪裡顯多,恩典就更顯多了。」「只是罪在哪裡顯多」——全部的意思是:舊亞當藉一次過犯帶進了死;新亞當卻從赦免無數過犯中賜下救恩。他說「罪在哪裡顯多」——因為律法既已領受,罪的犯行就不是出於無知,乃是出於知識。所以過犯開始顯多。「恩典就更顯多了。」
1:122
Ut sicut regnavit peccatum in mortem. Quomodo dicit Salvator: Cui plus dimittitur, plus diligit. Manifestata est quantitas peccati, ut scirent magnitudinem cratiae, et redderent magnitudinem charitatis, et ex indulgentia remissionis cresceret debitum charitatis. Ita et gratia regnet per justitiam in vitam æternam per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum. Manifestantur beneficia dum econtrario indignorum meritis comparantur: mors enim per Adam regnavit, vita per Cbristum. Ut sicut confirmatum est regnum peccati per legem contemptam, quæ abstulit excusationem ignorantiæ, ita et regnum gratiae confirmetur per multorum remissa peccatorum. CAP. VI. — Quid ergo dicemus ?
'That as sin reigned unto death.' As the Saviour says: 'To whom more is forgiven, he loves more.' The magnitude of sin was made manifest, that they might know the greatness of grace, and render a greatness of charity, and that from the indulgence of remission the debt of charity might grow. 'So also may grace reign through justice unto life eternal, through Jesus Christ our Lord.' The benefits are made manifest when, on the contrary, they are compared with the merits of the unworthy: for death reigned through Adam, life through Christ. That as the kingdom of sin was confirmed through the law despised, which took away the excuse of ignorance, so also the kingdom of grace may be confirmed through the remission of many sins. CHAPTER VI.—What shall we say then?
「就如罪作王叫人死。」正如救主所說:「多赦免的,就多愛。」罪的重大被顯明出來,好叫他們認識恩典的偉大,並回報以偉大的愛,並使愛的欠負因赦免的寬宏而增長。「照樣,恩典也藉著義作王,叫人因我們的主耶穌基督得永生。」這些恩惠得以顯明,正是當它們與不配之人的功過相對比之時:因為死藉亞當作王,生命藉基督作王。好叫罪的國度既藉被藐視的律法得以確立——那律法奪去了無知的藉口——照樣恩典的國度也藉赦免許多的罪得以確立。第六章——這樣,怎麼說呢?
1:123
Permanebimus in peccato, ut gratia abundet ? Illorum hic infertur objectio, qui adhuc parum intelligentes dicere poterant: Si gratia crescet in magnitudine delictorum, peccare debemus, ut gratia abundet, ut possit magis ac magis munificentia ejus in peccatoribus abundare. Absit. Absit. Illi tam imperite loquuntur, qui adhuc inlirmi inveniuntur. Nos vero persuasionem hujus ignorantiæ respuamus, qui jam mortui sumus peccato, ut gratiæ viveremus. Qui enim mortui sumus peccato, quomodo adhuc vivemus in illo? Vult tam firmum esse baptizatum, tamque perfectum, quasi qui ad capitalia committenda mortuo quodammodo comparetur: ut jam peccare non debeat, id est, crimen admittere.
'Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?' Here is inserted the objection of those who, still understanding little, could say: If grace grows in the magnitude of offenses, we ought to sin, that grace may abound, that His munificence may be able to abound more and more in sinners. 'God forbid.' God forbid. They speak so unskillfully who are still found to be weak. But let us who have already died to sin, that we might live to grace, reject the persuasion of this ignorance. 'For we who have died to sin, how shall we still live in it?' He wishes the baptized to be so firm and so perfect as one who, with respect to committing capital crimes, is in a manner compared to a dead man: so that he ought no longer to sin—that is, to commit crime.
「我們可以仍在罪中,叫恩典顯多嗎?」此處插入了那些領悟尚淺之人的反駁,他們能說:恩典若因過犯的重大而增長,我們就當犯罪,好叫恩典顯多,使祂的慷慨得以在罪人身上越發豐盛。「斷乎不可。」斷乎不可。那說這話如此拙劣的人,仍被看為軟弱。但我們這些已向罪死、好叫我們能向恩典而活的人,就當棄絕這無知的說服。「我們在罪上死了的人,豈可仍在罪中活著呢?」他要那受洗的人如此堅固、如此完全,彷彿就犯要命之罪而言,某種程度上如同死人一般:以致他不當再犯罪——就是說,不當犯大罪。
1:124
An ignoratis quia quicunque baptizali sumus in Christo Jesu. Aut nunquid sacramentum ipsius baptismatis ignoratis? In Scripturis baptismatum sunt genera tria: aquæ, ut Joannes; Spiritus, qui et ignis, ut in Actibus apostolorum. Descendit Spiritus sanctus quasi ignis, de cujus deitate alio loco demonstrat: Deus, inquit, noster ignis consumens est. Tertium genus est baptismi in sanguine, quo martyres baptizantur. Unde ipse Dominus jam baptizatus in Evangelio protestatur: Baptismo habeo baptizari quod vos nescitis. Sicut in Joannis apostoli epistola legimus: Tria sunt quae perhibent testimonium: aqua, sanguis, Spiritns. Unum in ministerio, non in natura.
'Or are you ignorant that all we who have been baptized in Christ Jesus…' Or are you perhaps ignorant of the sacrament of His baptism itself? In the Scriptures there are three kinds of baptisms: of water, as John's; of the Spirit, which is also fire, as in the Acts of the Apostles—the Holy Spirit descended as it were as fire, of whose deity he shows in another place: 'Our God,' he says, 'is a consuming fire.' The third kind is baptism in blood, whereby the martyrs are baptized; whence the Lord Himself, though already baptized, testifies in the Gospel: 'I have a baptism to be baptized with, which you know not.' As we read in the epistle of the Apostle John: 'There are three that bear witness: water, blood, and the Spirit'—one in ministry, not in nature.
「豈不知我們這受洗歸入基督耶穌的人……」或者你們竟不知祂洗禮的聖事嗎?聖經中有三種洗禮:水的洗禮,如約翰的;靈的洗禮,這靈也就是火,如使徒行傳中所載——聖靈彷彿火降下,論到聖靈的神性,他在別處指出:他說:「我們的神乃是烈火。」第三種是血的洗禮,殉道者藉此受洗;因此主自己雖已受洗,卻在福音書中作見證:「我有當受的洗,是你們所不知道的。」正如我們在使徒約翰的書信中所讀:「作見證的有三:水、血、與聖靈」——在職事上是一,在本性上卻不是一。
1:125
Aqua per figuram testis est dominicæ scpulturæ; sanguis testis est mortis; Spiritus testis est resurrcctionis: quia Spiritus auctor est vitae. In morte ipsius baptizati sumus. In morte Christi baptizamur, ut in ipsius morte credentes, quasi mortui viveremus. Quippe quibus nihil esset cum hoc mundo commune. Et quibus totus mundus erat auctoris exemplo moriturus, sicut multi sancti vel fecerunt vel faciunt: quia Christus pro omnibus mortuus est. Ergo omnes mortui sunt, ut et qui vivunt jam non sibi vivant, sed ei qui pro illis mortuus est. Vivo autem non jam ego: vivit vero in me Christus. Et, Mihi mundus crucifixus est, et ego mundo.
Water is by figure a witness of the Lord's burial; blood is a witness of His death; the Spirit is a witness of the resurrection, because the Spirit is the author of life. 'We have been baptized in His death.' We are baptized in the death of Christ, that, believing in His death, we might live as though dead—we to whom there should be nothing common with this world, and for whom the whole world was to die by the example of its Author, as many saints either have done or do; because Christ died for all. Therefore all are dead, that those who live may live no longer to themselves, but to Him who died for them. 'And now not I live, but Christ lives in me.' And, 'To me the world is crucified, and I to the world.'
水按預表是主埋葬的見證;血是主死的見證;聖靈是復活的見證,因為聖靈是生命的創始者。「我們受洗歸入祂的死。」我們受洗歸入基督的死,好叫我們信祂的死,就如同死了卻活著——我們與這世界本不該有甚麼相通,全世界也當照其創始者的榜樣向我們死了,正如許多聖徒已經如此行、或正在如此行;因為基督為眾人死。所以眾人都死了,好叫那活著的人不再為自己活,乃為那替他們死的活。「現在活著的不再是我,乃是基督在我裡面活著。」又說:「世界就我而言已經釘在十字架上,我就世界而言也是如此。」
1:126
Fieri enim non potest, nisi ut mortuo capite, omnia membra commoriantur. Caput enim pro omnibus membris pertulit pœnas, ut omnia in eum membra morerentur, et ita peccato mortua viverent Deo. Quomodo enim mortuus peccare non potest, ita et nos, qui Christo sumus commortui, implicari peccatis capitalibus non debemus. Qui crucifixus est, nihil aliud facit, nisi quod horam mortis exspectat, et in manus Patris commendat spiA ritum suum. Plenius requirendum est quid intelligi debeat, in morte ipsius baptizati sumus.
For it cannot come to pass but that, the head being dead, all the members die together with it. For the head bore the punishments for all the members, that all the members might die in Him, and thus, being dead to sin, might live to God. For as a dead man cannot sin, so also we, who have died together with Christ, ought not to be entangled in capital sins. He who is crucified does nothing else but await the hour of death, and into the hands of the Father commends his spirit. More fully it must be inquired what ought to be understood by 'we have been baptized in His death.'
因為斷不能有別樣,惟有頭既死了,眾肢體便一同死去。因為頭替眾肢體受了刑罰,好叫眾肢體在祂裡面死了,如此便向罪死、向神活。因為正如死人不能犯罪,照樣我們這些與基督一同死了的人,也不當被要命的罪所纏累。那被釘十字架的人,別無所作,惟有等候死的時辰,並將自己的靈交在父的手中。當更全面地追問,「我們受洗歸入祂的死」應當如何理解。
1:127
Praecipit Apostolus ut quia propter nos Christus crucifixus, morluus et sepultus est, et resurrexit, nos quoque ad passionis suae similitudinem voluntates et cupiditates nostras crucifigamus, et in baptismatis mysterio mortis, sepulturæ ac resurrectionis ejus exemplum imitemur, ut si passionum socii fuerimus, simus etiam consolationum. Sed requirendum quomodo possit in vita positus mori, et nondum mortuus sepeliri; et nondum sepultus, quomodo valeat suscitari. Hoc utique modo dum de filiis perditionis filii adoptionis efficimur, priori naturæ secunda nativitate præmorimur; et dum sub cognato terrae elemento submergimur, sepelimur; dum e sinu fontis assurgimus, suscitamur:
The Apostle enjoins that, because for our sake Christ was crucified, died and was buried, and rose again, we too, unto the likeness of His passion, should crucify our own wills and desires, and in the mystery of baptism imitate the example of His death, burial, and resurrection; so that if we have been companions of His sufferings, we may be also of His consolations. But it must be asked how one placed in life can die, and, not yet dead, be buried; and, not yet buried, how he can be raised up. In this way, surely: while from sons of perdition we are made sons of adoption, we die beforehand to our former nature by a second birth; and while we are submerged under the kindred element of earth, we are buried; while we rise up from the bosom of the font, we are raised.
使徒吩咐說:因基督為我們的緣故被釘十字架、受死、埋葬,並且復活,我們也當效法祂受難的樣式,將自己的意志與私慾釘十字架,並在洗禮的奧祕中效法祂死、埋葬、復活的榜樣;好叫我們若作了祂受苦的同伴,也可作祂安慰的同伴。但須追問:一個活著的人如何能死,尚未死如何能埋葬,尚未埋葬又如何能被復活?無疑正是如此:當我們從沉淪之子成為得兒子名分之子時,我們藉第二次的出生預先向舊有的本性死了;當我們沉沒於那與土同類的元素之下時,我們就被埋葬了;當我們從泉源的懷中升起時,我們就被復活了。
1:128
et ex huc maximum baptismatis sacramentum est. Et ideo dixit: Consepulti sumus cum illo per baptismum in mortem. Et in consequenti: Si, inquit, mortui sumus cum Christo, credimus quia simul etiam vivimus cum Christo. Elaborandum est itaque ut nihil de sordibus veteris hominis agnoscatur in nobis. Unde si quis nostrum forte praevenitur dono Domini per pœnitentiam diluatur. Si ergo fuerimus novi, et immutati in conversatione, similiter novi et immutati efficiemur in gloria. Scientes quia vetus homo noster simul crucifixus est. Vetus homo dicitur qui veterem et terrenum Adam aut deposuisse nondum videtur, aut eumdem, in cœnum prioris vitæ relapsus, imitatur.
And from this the sacrament of baptism is very great. And therefore he said: 'We were buried together with Him through baptism unto death.' And in what follows: 'If,' he says, 'we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live together with Christ.' We must labor, therefore, that nothing of the filth of the old man may be recognized in us; whence, if any of us is perchance forestalled by a fault, let him be washed clean through penitence by the gift of the Lord. If, then, we shall have been new and changed in conduct, likewise new and changed shall we be made in glory. 'Knowing that our old man is crucified together.' He is called the old man who either is not yet seen to have put off the old and earthly Adam, or imitates the same, having relapsed into the mire of his former life.
由此看來,洗禮的聖事極其偉大。因此他說:「我們藉洗禮與祂一同埋葬歸入死。」接著又說:他說:「我們若與基督同死,就信必與基督同活。」所以我們當竭力,使我們身上不見有一點舊人的污穢;因此,我們中間若有人偶被過犯所勝,就當藉主的恩賜、透過悔改得以洗淨。這樣,我們若在行為上成為新造、得了更新,照樣也必在榮耀中成為新造、得了更新。「知道我們的舊人和祂同釘十字架。」所謂舊人,是指那尚未顯明脫去了屬地舊亞當的人,或指那重陷前生污泥、效法那舊亞當的人。
1:129
Sicut autem redemptor ille innoxium corpus appendit, ita nos noxium suspendamus a vitiis. In quo mysterio crucis Moyses serpentem æreum in dorso * suspendit, ut destruatur corpus peccati. Hoc est, ut non ex parte, sed omne vitium destruatur. Consepulti enim sumus cum illo per baplismum in mortem. In exemplo Christi ad cum imitandum consepelimur in baptismo, ut mortui veteribus criminibus renuntiemns diabolo et pompis ejus. Ostendit nos ita baptizari ut consepeliamur Christo. Ut quomodo surrexit Christus a mortuis per gloriam Patris. Ut quomodo glorificatur Pater per resurrectionem Filii, ita et per conversationis nostræ novitatem gloriflcetur. Ita et nos in novitate vitæ ambulemus.
But as that Redeemer hung up an innocent body, so let us hang up our guilty body away from vices. In which mystery of the cross Moses hung up the brazen serpent upon a pole, 'that the body of sin may be destroyed'—that is, that vice may be destroyed not in part but wholly. 'For we were buried together with Him through baptism unto death.' In the example of Christ, to imitate Him, we are buried together in baptism, that, being dead to our old crimes, we may renounce the devil and his pomps. He shows that we are so baptized as to be buried together with Christ. 'That as Christ rose from the dead by the glory of the Father'—that as the Father is glorified through the resurrection of the Son, so also may He be glorified through the newness of our conduct. 'So we also may walk in newness of life.'
但正如那救贖主懸掛了無罪的身體,我們也當將自己有罪的身體從諸惡中懸掛起來。在十字架的這奧祕中,摩西將銅蛇掛在杆上,「叫罪身滅絕」——就是說,叫惡不是部分地、乃是全然地被滅絕。「因為我們藉洗禮與祂一同埋葬歸入死。」我們效法基督的榜樣、為要效法祂,就在洗禮中與祂一同埋葬,好叫我們向舊有的罪過死了,便棄絕魔鬼和牠一切的虛華。他指明我們如此受洗,就是與基督一同埋葬。「叫我們像基督藉父的榮耀從死裡復活一樣」——好叫父怎樣藉子的復活得榮耀,照樣也藉我們行為的更新得榮耀。「我們也可以行事為人有新生的樣式。」
1:130
Ostendit quomodo viventes mortui esse possimus, nec aliquid velle aut cupere debeamus, quod volunt aut cupiunt ii qui novi non sunt. Si enim complantati facti sumus similitudini mortis ejus, simul et resurrectionis erimus. Si consepulti sumus, et resurrectionis erimus participes. Si complantati non sumus, nec conresurgemus: et si fuerimus novi in vita, erimus in gloria. Si similitudinem mortis habuerimus, et resurrectionis habebimus. Hoc scientes, quia vetus homo noster simul crucifixus est. Qui veterem hominem et terrenum imitando peccabant. Nam vetus homo Adam intelligitur, sicut novus Christus. Ut destruatur corpus peccati. Unum vitium membrum est peccati:
He shows how, living, we can be dead, and ought to will or desire nothing that they will or desire who are not new. 'For if we have been planted together in the likeness of His death, we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection.' If we have been buried together, we shall be also partakers of the resurrection. If we have not been planted together, neither shall we rise together; and if we shall have been new in life, we shall be new in glory. If we shall have had the likeness of His death, we shall have also that of His resurrection. 'Knowing this, that our old man is crucified together'—those who by imitating the old and earthly man were sinning. For by the old man is understood Adam, as by the new, Christ. 'That the body of sin may be destroyed.' One vice is a member of sin.
他指明我們如何能活著卻已死,並不當有絲毫非新造之人所願、所欲的意願或慾望。「我們若在祂死的形狀上與祂聯合,也必在祂復活的形狀上與祂聯合。」我們若與祂一同埋葬,也必一同有分於復活。我們若沒有與祂聯合,也就不能與祂一同復活;我們若在生命中成為新造,就必在榮耀中成為新造。我們若有了祂死的形狀,也必有祂復活的形狀。「知道這一點,就是我們的舊人和祂同釘十字架」——指那些藉效法屬地舊人而犯罪的人。因為舊人是指亞當,正如新人是指基督。「叫罪身滅絕。」一項惡就是罪的一個肢體。
1:131
corpus vero universitas delictorum, quorum prineipium originale peccatum. Christus autem non ex parte, sed integer est crucifixus, ut nos ex toto moriamur peccato, et vivamus Deo; sive ut corpus nostrum destruatur a servitute peccati, et fiat justitiæ mancipium, quod solebat esse delicti. Ut ultra non serviamus peccato. Omnis enim qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati. Qui enim mortuus est justificatus est a peccato. Hoc est, alienatus est a peccato, jani non potest peccare: crucifixus enim, omnibus membris dolore occupatis, peccare non potest; sed concnpiscentiis et passionibus contradicit. Si aulem mortui sumus cum Christo, credimus quia simul eliam vivemus cum Christo.
But the body is the totality of offenses, whose beginning is original sin. But Christ was crucified not in part, but whole, that we might wholly die to sin and live to God; or that our body might be destroyed from the servitude of sin, and become the bondservant of justice, which was wont to be of offense. 'That we may no longer serve sin.' For everyone who commits sin is the servant of sin. 'For he who has died is justified from sin'—that is, he is estranged from sin, he can no longer sin; for the crucified man, all his members being possessed by pain, cannot sin, but contradicts his concupiscences and passions. 'But if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live together with Christ.'
但這身乃是眾過犯的總和,其根源是原罪。然而基督不是部分地、乃是全然地被釘十字架,好叫我們全然向罪死、向神活;或叫我們的身體從罪的奴役中被滅絕,成為義的僕役,這身本是罪的僕役。「叫我們不再作罪的奴僕。」因為凡犯罪的,就是罪的奴僕。「因為已死的人是脫離了罪」——就是說,他已與罪疏遠,不能再犯罪;因為那被釘十字架的人,四肢都被痛苦所佔據,就不能犯罪,反倒抵擋自己的情慾與私慾。「我們若與基督同死,就信必與基督同活。」
1:132
Sicut et alibi dicit: Si commortui sumus, et convivemus. Scientes quod Christus surgens a mortuis, jam non moritur. Sic et nos, si mortui fuerimus vitiis, mortem secundam non timebimus. Aut certe ita: sicut jam pro vobis non potest, si criminose vixeritis, Christus iterum cruciligi, ita et vos non potestis iterum baptizari, sicut alibi dicit: Impossibile est eos qui semel sunt illuminati, et participes sunt effecti, renovari rursus ad pœnitentiam, rursus crucifigentes in se Filium Dei; quibus non pœnitentiam, sed innovationem, id est iterationem baptismatis interdicit. Mors illi ultra non dominabitur.
As he says also elsewhere: 'If we have died together, we shall also live together.' 'Knowing that Christ rising from the dead now dies no more.' So also we, if we shall have died to vices, shall not fear the second death. Or certainly thus: as Christ can no longer be crucified again for you if you live criminally, so also you cannot be baptized again; as he says elsewhere: 'It is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have been made partakers, to be renewed again unto penitence, crucifying again to themselves the Son of God'—to whom he forbids not penitence but renovation, that is, the repetition of baptism. 'Death shall no more have dominion over Him.'
正如他在別處也說:「我們若與祂同死,也必與祂同活。」「知道基督既從死裡復活,就不再死。」照樣我們若向諸惡死了,也必不懼怕第二次的死。或必是如此:正如你若犯罪度日,基督也不能為你再被釘十字架,照樣你也不能再受洗;正如他在別處所說:「論到那些已經蒙了光照、又嘗過…並與…有分的人,若是離棄道理,就不能叫他們重新懊悔了,因為他們把神的兒子重釘十字架」——他所禁止的不是悔改,乃是更新,就是洗禮的重複。「死也不再作祂的主了。」
1:133
Si ultra non dominabitur, ergo jam dominata est, contra Manicbxos, quia negant Christum veram carnem babuissc. Quod enim mortuus est peccato. Sive quod pro peccato generis humani, sive quod morti ipsi, quae in eum ultra locum non potuerit habere, sit mortuus. Mortuus est semel. Id est sicut caput vestrum semel est mortuum, sic et vos membra illius effecti, vitae ejus exempla sectamini, ut nihil morti ulterius debeatis, hoc est, ut in vobis locum mors secunda non babeat. Nam qui credit baptismum posse iierare, credit Cbristum posse iterum crucifigi. Quod autem vivit, vivit Deo. Vivit in deitate, ipse homo Deus. Ita et vos existimate vos. Quasi filii vel membra ejns vos intelligite.
If death shall no longer have dominion, then it once did have dominion—against the Manichees, because they deny that Christ had true flesh. 'For in that He died, He died to sin.' Either that He died for the sin of the human race, or that He died to death itself, which could have no further place in Him. 'He died once'—that is, as your head died once, so you also, being made His members, follow the examples of His life, that you may owe nothing further to death; that is, that in you the second death may have no place. For he who believes that baptism can be repeated believes that Christ can be crucified again. 'But in that He lives, He lives to God.' He lives in deity, the very Man being God. 'So also reckon yourselves'—understand yourselves as sons or members of Him.
死若不再作主,那麼死曾經作過主——這是駁斥摩尼教徒,因他們否認基督有真實的肉身。「祂死是為罪死。」或指祂為人類的罪而死,或指祂向死本身死了,這死在祂身上不能再有立足之地。「祂死是一次」——就是說,正如你們的頭死了一次,照樣你們既成了祂的肢體,就當效法祂生命的榜樣,使你們不再欠死甚麼;就是說,使第二次的死在你們身上無立足之地。因為那相信洗禮可以重複的人,就是相信基督可以再被釘十字架。「祂活是向神活。」祂在神性中活,這人正是神。「照樣你們也當看自己」——當理解自己為祂的兒子或肢體。
1:134
Mortuos quidem esse peccato. Sicut imitator ejus dicebat: Vivo autem jam non ego, vivit vero in me Christus. Viventes autem. Hoc est, ejus vitam sequentes, in nobis nondum vivimus, sed jam in Christo vivimus omnes. Mortui enim sumus, et vita nostra abscondita est cum Christo in Deo. Deo in Christo Jesu. llle autem vivit Deo, qui Christi vestigia humilitate, şanctificatione, pietate sectatur. Non ergo regnet peccatum in vestro mortali corpore, ut obediatis concupiscentiis ejus. Ostendit quomodo regnet. Ille enim regnat, cui omnes obediunt. Quomodo in corpore peccatum regnet exposuit, id est, si vitiatae naturae praebeamus obedientiam et consentiamus. Non dixit: Non sit, quia jam ibi est; sed:
'Indeed dead to sin.' As His imitator said: 'Now not I live, but Christ lives in me.' 'But alive'—that is, following His life, we do not yet live in ourselves, but already we all live in Christ. For we are dead, and our life is hidden with Christ in God. 'To God in Christ Jesus.' But he lives to God who follows the footsteps of Christ in humility, sanctification, and piety. 'Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that you should obey its concupiscences.' He shows how it reigns. For he reigns whom all obey. How sin reigns in the body he has explained—that is, if we yield obedience to the corrupted nature and consent. He did not say, 'Let it not be,' because it is already there; but,
「向罪確是死了。」正如祂的效法者所說:「現在活著的不再是我,乃是基督在我裡面活著。」「卻活著」——就是說,我們跟從祂的生命,在自己裡面尚未活著,卻已在基督裡都活著了。因為我們是死了,我們的生命與基督一同藏在神裡面。「在基督耶穌裡向神活著。」但那向神活著的人,乃是以謙卑、成聖、虔敬跟從基督腳蹤的人。「所以,不要容罪在你們必死的身上作王,使你們順從身子的私慾。」他指明罪如何作王。因為凡人都順從的,就作了王。罪如何在身上作王,他已解明——就是說,我們若向敗壞的本性獻上順從並且應允。他沒有說「不要有」,因為罪已在那裡了;乃是說:
1:135
Non regnet, id est, non fiat quod jubet. Surgit ira: noli dare iræ linguam ad maledicendum, non manum ad feriendum, non membra libidini: quæ non surgeret, nisi peccatum esset in membris nostris. Inest quidem peccatum in membris; sed non regnat, si non obediatur desideriis ejus. Et ideo dum quod non vult, agit, id est, non vult concupiscere, concupiscit, consentit I legi, quoniam bona est: hoc enim vult et ipse quod lex, quia vult ipse non concupiscere, et lex dixit: Non concupisces. Sed neque exhibeatis membra vestra arma iniquitatis peccato. Unumquodque membrum si officium saum in malos usus converterit, arma iniquitatis efficitur ad justitiam expugnandam:
'Let it not reign'—that is, let not what it commands be done. Anger rises: do not give to anger a tongue for cursing, nor a hand for striking, nor your members to lust; which would not rise unless sin were in our members. Sin is indeed present in the members, but it does not reign if its desires are not obeyed. And therefore, while one does what he does not will—that is, he does not will to covet, yet covets—he 'consents to the law, that it is good'; for he too wills what the law wills, because he himself wills not to covet, and the law has said, 'You shall not covet.' 'But neither yield your members as weapons of iniquity unto sin.' If any member shall have turned its office to evil uses, it is made a weapon of iniquity for storming justice:
「不要作王」——就是說,不要行它所命令的。怒氣發作:不可將舌頭給怒氣去咒罵,不可將手給它去打人,不可將肢體給情慾;這些若非罪在我們肢體中,本不會發作。罪確在肢體中,但若不順從它的慾望,它便不作王。因此,當人行他所不願的——就是說,他不願貪心,卻貪心了——他就「應允律法是善的」;因為他自己所願的正與律法所願的相同,因他自己願不貪心,而律法也說了「不可貪心」。「也不要將你們的肢體獻給罪作不義的兵器。」肢體若將其職分轉作邪惡的用途,便成了攻擊公義的不義兵器:
1:136
si manus ad furtum, lingua ad mendacium vel blasphemiam; si oculus concupiscentiae serviat ad pudicitiam expugnandam, et caetera. Sed exhibete vos Deo tanquam ex mortuis viventes. Tanquam jam resurrexeritis: post resurrectionem autem non carnaliter vivitur, nec peccatur. Et membra vestra arma justitiæ DeoUt oculus qui ante videbat ad peccandum, nunc videat ad boni operis ministerium; qui ante videbat ad exspoliandum, nunc videat ad vestiendum: sic etiam de reliquis membris adverte, ut de iniquitate ad misericordiam commutentur. Peccatum enim nobis non dominabitur. Non vos vincat peccatum: non enim estis parvuli, sed perfecti; quasi pædagogus puero dicat:
if the hand for theft, the tongue for lying or blasphemy; if the eye should serve concupiscence for storming chastity, and the rest. 'But present yourselves to God as those alive from the dead.' As though you had already risen; but after the resurrection one does not live carnally, nor sin. 'And your members as weapons of justice unto God.' That the eye which before looked to sin might now look to the ministry of good work; which before looked to plunder might now look to clothe: thus also consider concerning the remaining members, that they may be changed from iniquity to mercy. 'For sin shall not have dominion over you.' Let not sin conquer you; for you are not little ones, but perfect—as a schoolmaster might say to a boy:
若手用於偷竊,舌頭用於說謊或褻瀆;若眼睛服事情慾去攻擊貞潔,其餘也是如此。「倒要像從死裡復活的人,將自己獻給神。」彷彿你已經復活了;但復活之後,人就不再照肉體而活,也不犯罪。「將肢體作義的兵器獻給神。」使那先前看向犯罪的眼,如今看向善工的職事;使那先前看向掠奪的眼,如今看向給人穿衣:對其餘的肢體也當如此思想,使它們從不義轉向憐憫。「罪必不能作你們的主。」不要讓罪勝過你們;因為你們不是嬰孩,乃是成熟的——就如教師對孩童所說:
1:137
Noli facere vitium sermonis, non enim adhuc audis grammaticum, sed oratorem. Sive non dominabitur, non habet dominari. Non enim sub lege estis, sed sub gratia. Id est, suh benevolentia Redemptoris, qui pugnandi atque vincendi et conatus dedit, et doctrinam praebuit; sed et exemplum insuper, et virtutem per consolationem Spiritus sancti donavit, per quam liberamur a dominatione peccati. Quid ergo ? peccabimus quia non sumus sub lege? Qui sub lege est premitur a lege, dum non implet legem; non est sub lege, sed cum lege. Sed sub gratia ? Absit. An nescitis quoniam cui exhibetis vos servos ad obediendum, servi estis ejus cui obedistis, sive peccati ad mortem, sive obeditionis ad justitiam?
'Do not make a fault of speech, for you no longer hear the grammarian, but the orator.' Or 'shall not have dominion' means, it has no right to have dominion. 'For you are not under the law, but under grace.' That is, under the benevolence of the Redeemer, who gave both the effort of fighting and of conquering, and furnished doctrine; but also besides, gave an example, and virtue through the consolation of the Holy Spirit, through which we are freed from the dominion of sin. 'What then? Shall we sin because we are not under the law?' He who is under the law is oppressed by the law, while he does not fulfill the law; he is not under the law, but with the law. 'But under grace? God forbid. Do you not know that to whom you yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants you are whom you have obeyed—whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto justice?'
「不要犯言語的錯誤,因為你所聽的不再是文法師,乃是修辭家。」或「必不能作主」意思是,它無權作主。「因你們不在律法之下,乃在恩典之下。」就是說,在救贖主的恩慈之下,祂既賜下爭戰與得勝的力量,又提供了教訓;此外更賜下榜樣,並藉聖靈的安慰賜下德能,我們藉此得以脫離罪的轄制。「這卻怎麼樣呢?我們既不在律法之下,就可以犯罪嗎?」凡在律法之下的人,既不遵行律法,就被律法所壓制;他不是在律法之下,乃是與律法同在。「乃在恩典之下嗎?斷乎不可。豈不曉得你們獻上自己作奴僕、順從誰,就作誰的奴僕嗎——或作罪的奴僕以至於死,或作順命的奴僕以至於成義?」
1:138
Ne indocti et in fide rudes objicerent: Ergo cessante vindicta legis, impune peccabimus. Absit. Gratia quae et donavit quomodo vincamus, non vult nos omnino peccare: si volueritis peccare, dominabitur vobis legis sententia, quae vindicat in peccantes. Si autem justitiae servieritis, non estis sub lege, sed sub gratia. Non enim, inquit, potestis duobus servire. Hic quod dixit, peccabimus, criminalia et capitalia peccata intelligamus, non minuta, sine quibus esse non possumus. Hoc et ubique intellige, ubi prohibemur peccare; quia et de ipsis peccatis loquebatur, quae et lex damnare consueverat, secundum illud: Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, etc.
Lest the untaught and those raw in faith should object: Therefore, the vindication of the law having ceased, we shall sin with impunity. God forbid. The grace which also gave us the means whereby we conquer does not will us to sin at all: if you shall have willed to sin, the sentence of the law, which takes vengeance on sinners, shall have dominion over you. But if you shall have served justice, you are not under the law, but under grace. 'For,' he says, 'you cannot serve two masters.' Here, what he said—'we shall sin'—let us understand of criminal and capital sins, not of the minute ones, without which we cannot be. Understand this too everywhere that we are forbidden to sin; because he was speaking of those very sins which the law also was wont to condemn, according to that: 'If we say that we have no sin,' etc.
免得那未受教導、在信德上生疏的人反駁說:這樣,律法的懲治既已止息,我們就可以放縱犯罪而不受罰。斷乎不可。那賜給我們得勝之法的恩典,斷不願我們犯罪:你若甘願犯罪,那向罪人施行報應的律法之判決,就必轄制你。但你若服事公義,就不在律法之下,乃在恩典之下。他說:「因為你們不能事奉兩個主。」在此,他所說「我們可以犯罪」,我們當理解為刑事的、要命的罪,而非那些微小、我們難免的罪。凡我們被禁止犯罪之處,也都當如此理解;因為他所論的正是律法素來所定罪的那些罪,正如那話所說:「我們若說自己無罪」等等。
1:139
Gratias autem Deo quod fuistis servi peccati. Gratias Deo, quia fuistis, sed ipso liberante et adjuvante jam non estis: quia obeditis, quia resistitis adjulore Deo. Obedistis autem. Ut dono et exemplo Christi vivatis, qui non solum peccata, sed occasiones auferre donavit et docuit delictorum. Imitatores, inquit, mei estote, sicut et ego Christi ex cordc, ex fide. In eam formam doctrinæ in qua traditi estis. Novi Teslamenli. Liberati autem a peccato. Liberi facti. Servi facti estis justitiæ. Per gratiam Dei. Humanum dico. Quia non potestis ad. huc audire divinum. Sive sic: humanitate dignum est quod dico, quod etiam apud homines rationem habet, et facile intelligi potest. Hoc est:
But thanks be to God that you were the servants of sin. Thanks be to God, because you were such; but now, through his own delivering and helping, you are so no longer: for you obey, for you resist, with God as your helper. Now you have obeyed. That you may live by the gift and the example of Christ, who granted and taught the taking away not only of sins but even of the occasions of transgressions. 'Be imitators of me,' he says, 'as I also am of Christ' — from the heart, from faith. Into that form of doctrine into which you have been delivered: namely, the New Testament. And having been freed from sin: that is, made free. You have been made the servants of righteousness: through the grace of God. I speak after the manner of men: because you cannot yet hear what is divine. Or thus: what I say is worthy of human nature, since it holds good even among men and can easily be understood. That is:
感謝神,你們雖然作過罪的奴僕。感謝神,因為你們曾是如此,但如今藉著祂親自的釋放與幫助,你們已不再是罪的奴僕了;因為你們順服、你們抵擋,有神作你們的幫助者。你們既已順服,就當靠著基督的恩賜與榜樣而活。基督不但賜下並教導人除去罪,甚至除去犯罪的機會。他說:「你們該效法我,像我效法基督一樣」——這是出於心、出於信德。你們既然從心裡順服了所傳給你們的那教訓的規範,也就是新約。你們既從罪裡得了釋放,就是得了自由,作了義的奴僕,這是藉著神的恩典。我且照著人的常話說,因為你們還不能聽受屬神的道理。或這樣說:我所說的乃是合乎人性的,就是在人中間也有其道理,容易明白。這就是說:
1:140
Majora quidem exigere a vobis pro divinae servitutis retributione deberem; sed condescendens et temperans infirmitati vestrae, humana et possibilia prædico atque persuideo: ut sicut prompti fuistis ad sectanda DOlia atque contraria, ita alacres sitis ad ea quae utilia et saluti amica sunt peragenda. Propter infirmitalem carnis velor. Corpus quod corrumpitur aggravat animam, quia quidquid anima carnaliter fecerit, carni deputatur; et quando anima cœlestia agit, totus homo spiritalis est. Carnalis si vincitur a coneupiscentiis; spiritalis, cum dono Dei vincit concupiseentias.
I ought indeed to demand greater things of you as a return for the divine servitude; but condescending to and tempering myself to your weakness, I proclaim and urge things human and possible: that as you were ready to pursue what was harmful and contrary, so you may be eager to accomplish the things that are useful and friendly to salvation. I speak because of the infirmity of the flesh. The body which is corrupted weighs down the soul, because whatever the soul does carnally is reckoned to the flesh; and when the soul does heavenly things, the whole man is spiritual. A man is carnal if he is overcome by concupiscences; spiritual, when by the gift of God he overcomes the concupiscences.
為著這屬神的服事所當得的報答,我本應向你們要求更大的事;但我體恤並遷就你們的軟弱,只宣講並勸勉那合乎人情、力所能及的事:就是你們從前怎樣情願追隨那有害而相反的事,如今也當同樣熱切地去成就那有益且有助於救恩的事。我是因肉體的軟弱這樣說。這必朽壞的身體叫魂沉重,因為魂凡照肉體所行的,都算在肉體的帳上;而當魂行屬天的事時,全人就都是屬靈的了。人若被私慾勝過,就是屬肉體的;人若靠神的恩賜勝過私慾,就是屬靈的。
1:141
Sicut enim exhibuistis membra vestra servire, ita nunc voluntate mutata exhibeamus nos servire justitiæ, non sicut Manichaei, qui dicunt naturam corporis ita in se per conditionem insertum habere peccatum, ut illud superare non possit; sed per gratiam renovati non exhibeamus membra nostra ad malum: nam non est ex se corpus malum, sed voluntates quas mutare jubemur, quae per transgressoris reatum vitio naturae inesse noscuntur, non conditione. Immunditiæ et iniquitati. Luxuriæ sive idololatriæ. Ad iniquitatem. Ad iniquitatem faciendam. Ita nunc exhibete membra vestra servire justitiæ. Ut quomodo perfecti fuistis in malo, ex originali peccato, ita perfecti sitis in bono, gratiae dono;
For just as you presented your members to be in bondage, so now, with the will changed, let us present ourselves to serve righteousness — not like the Manichaeans, who say that the nature of the body has sin so implanted in it by its very constitution that it cannot overcome it; but, being renewed by grace, let us not present our members unto evil. For the body is not of itself evil, but the will, which we are commanded to change; and this will is known to be present through the vice of nature by reason of the transgressor's guilt, not by its constitution. Unto uncleanness and iniquity: that is, unto luxury or idolatry. Unto iniquity: unto the doing of iniquity. So now present your members to serve righteousness: that, as you were perfected in evil through original sin, so you may be perfected in good through the gift of grace;
你們從前怎樣獻上肢體作奴僕,如今也當這樣,因意志已經改變,就獻上自己作義的奴僕——不像摩尼教徒那樣,他們說身體的本性因其構造,罪已如此植入其中,以致無法勝過它;然而我們既因恩典得了更新,就不當獻上肢體去行惡。因為身體本身並非惡的,惡乃在於那我們被命令去改變的意志;這意志是因犯罪者的罪責,藉本性的敗壞而存在,並非出於受造之初的構造。獻給污穢與不義:就是獻給放縱或拜偶像。以致不義:以致去行不義。如今也當這樣獻上肢體作義的奴僕:使你們從前怎樣因原罪在惡上被造成全,如今也照樣因恩典的恩賜在善上得以完全;
1:142
ut manus quæ antea rapiebat, modo porrigat misericordiam; et pedes qui antea ad malum currebant, modo ad visitandos infirmos, et in carcerem ad opus bonum currant; oculi qui antea videbant ad concupiscendum, ad invadendum, videant modo ad miserandum, ad largiendum. Ecce sic mutentur membra nostra. In sanctificationem. Ut recipiatis sanctificationem, sive possideatis. Cum enim servi essetis peccati, liberi fuistis justitiæ. Hoc est, in nullo servistis justitiæ. Ita et nunc liberi estote a peccato, ut in nullo ei serviatis. Ecce ostenduntur etiam peccato minime potuisse, nisi alia libertate servire. Liberi ergo a justitia non sunt, nisi arbitrio voluntatis.
so that the hand which formerly plundered may now reach out in mercy; and the feet which formerly ran to evil may now run to visit the sick and go into the prison for a good work; and the eyes which formerly looked to covet and to seize may now look to have compassion and to give freely. Behold, thus let our members be changed. Unto sanctification: that you may receive sanctification, or possess it. For when you were the servants of sin, you were free from righteousness. That is, in nothing did you serve righteousness. So also now be free from sin, that you may serve it in nothing. Behold, it is shown that they could not so much as be able to sin except by serving under another kind of bondage. Therefore they are not free from righteousness except by the choice of the will.
使那從前搶奪人的手,如今伸出來施憐憫;那從前奔向惡事的腳,如今奔去探望病人、進入監牢行善事;那從前為貪戀、為攫取而觀看的眼睛,如今為憐憫、為施捨而觀看。看哪,我們的肢體當這樣改變。以致成聖:使你們得著成聖,或說擁有成聖。因為你們作罪之奴僕的時候,就不被義約束。就是說,你們在義上絲毫沒有服事。如今也要照樣脫離罪得自由,在罪上絲毫不服事它。看哪,這就顯明:他們若非藉著服在另一種轄制之下,連犯罪都不能夠。所以他們脫離義的自由,無非是出於意志的抉擇。
1:143
Liberati autem a peccato non fiunt, nisi gratia Salvatoris. Liberos dixit justitiæ, non liberatos; a peccato autem non liberos, ne sibi hoc tribuerent, sed liberatos: id est, si vos Filius liberaverit, tunc vere liberi eritis. Quem ergo fructum habuistis tunc, in quibus nunc erubescitis ? Qualem fructum in actione illius habuistis, in cujus etiam recordatione verecundia est? Quicunque se cognoverit bonum, erubescit se fuisse malum. Et quicunque se erubescit bonum, malus est, quia nec in præsenti fructum habet, et finem mortem. Nam finis illorum, malorum scilicet, mors est. Poena perpetua. Nunc vero liberati a peccato. Attende quia liberati dixit, ut non nobis, sed Deo demus gloriam.
But they are not freed from sin except by the grace of the Saviour. He called them free with respect to righteousness, not freed; but with respect to sin he called them not free, lest they should attribute this to themselves, but freed: that is, 'if the Son shall make you free, then shall you be free indeed.' What fruit therefore had you then in those things whereof you are now ashamed? What sort of fruit had you in that deed, at the very recollection of which there is shame? Whoever comes to know himself as good is ashamed to have been evil. And whoever is ashamed of himself as being good, is evil, because he has no fruit in the present, and his end is death. For the end of those things — of the evil things, that is — is death: a perpetual punishment. But now being freed from sin. Note that he said 'freed,' so that we may give the glory not to ourselves but to God.
但他們若非藉著救主的恩典,就不能從罪裡得釋放。論到義,他稱他們為自由的,而非被釋放的;但論到罪,他稱他們不是自由的,免得他們把這歸功於自己,乃稱他們為被釋放的:這就是「天父的兒子若叫你們自由,你們就真自由了。」你們現今所看為羞恥的事,當日有甚麼果子呢?在那如今一回想就覺羞愧的行為上,你們有過甚麼果子呢?凡認識自己為善的,就以自己曾為惡而羞愧。凡以自己為善卻仍感羞愧的,其實是惡的,因為他現今既無果子,結局又是死亡。因為那些事——就是那些惡事——的結局就是死,是永遠的刑罰。但如今既從罪裡得了釋放。要注意他說「被釋放」,好叫我們不將榮耀歸於自己,乃歸於神。
1:144
Servi autem facti Deo, habetis fructum vestrum in sancti ficationem, finem vero vitam æternam. In Dei servitio permanere, hoc ipsum jam fructus est quod vivitis, saoctificati per baptismum. Servus autem Dei vicem inimicis non reddit sicut Joseph, qui dixit fratribus: Nolite timere, servus enim Dei ego sum. Dei autem servi in praesenti fructum ha* bent donum Spiritus sancti, et finem vitam aeternam, sive sanctificationem bonae vitae. Ergo in ista vita adhuc ex qua parte servi sumus Deo, liberl sumus peccato; ex qua parte adhuc servimus legi, peccati adhuc servi sumus. Et ideo dixit: Condelector enim legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem. Ecce unde liberi, unde condelectamur legi Dei?
But being made servants to God, you have your fruit unto sanctification, and the end everlasting life. To abide in the service of God — this very thing is already fruit, namely that you live, being sanctified through baptism. Now the servant of God does not render evil to his enemies in turn, as Joseph, who said to his brothers: 'Fear not, for I am a servant of God.' The servants of God, moreover, have in the present their fruit — the gift of the Holy Spirit — and their end everlasting life, or the sanctification of a good life. Therefore in this present life, in that part in which we are servants to God, we are free from sin; but in that part in which we still serve the law, we are still servants of sin. And therefore he said: 'For I delight in the law of God according to the inward man.' Behold, whence are we free, whence do we delight in the law of God?
但現今你們既作了神的奴僕,就有成聖的果子,那結局就是永生。存留在神的服事中——這本身就已是果子,就是你們活著,且藉著洗禮成了聖潔。神的僕人不以惡報仇敵,如約瑟對他弟兄所說:「不要害怕,因為我是神的僕人。」神的眾僕人在現今有他們的果子,就是聖靈的恩賜,而結局就是永生,或說美好生命的成聖。所以在今生,就我們作神奴僕的那一面,我們脫離了罪;但就我們仍服事律法的那一面,我們仍是罪的奴僕。因此他說:「按著我裡面的人,我是喜歡神的律。」看哪,我們從何得自由,又從何喜歡神的律呢?
1:145
Libertas enim delectat: nam quandiu timore facis quod justum est, non Deus te delectat. Stipendia enim peccati mors. Remuneralio dicitur stipendium. Merito ergo stipendium, quia malitiæ diabolicae mors æterna, tanquam debitum redditur. Qui militat peccato, mercedem accipit mortem. Gratia aulem Dei vita æterna, in Christo Jeiu Domino nostro. Gratia sub qua estis. Simulque notandum quia non dixit stipendia justitiæ, quia non illam habemus ex nobis. Ergo quamvis nostra non sit, sed gratiae, tamen custodita Dei adjutorio vitam dat æternam, transacta vita tempora!!. CAP. VII. — An ignoratis, fratres, scientibus enim legem loquor.
For freedom brings delight: for as long as you do what is just out of fear, God does not delight you. For the wages of sin is death. Recompense is called wages. Rightly then is it called wages, because eternal death is rendered to devilish malice as a debt owed. He who serves as a soldier for sin receives death as his pay. But the grace of God is life eternal, in Christ Jesus our Lord: the grace under which you now are. And at the same time it is to be noted that he did not say 'the wages of righteousness,' because we do not have that of ourselves. Therefore, although it is not ours but of grace, yet, kept by the help of God, it gives life eternal when this life's span is finished. CHAPTER VII. — Do you not know, brethren (for I speak to them that know the law)?
因為自由帶來喜樂:因為你若只是出於懼怕才行公義的事,神就不能使你喜樂。因為罪的工價乃是死。報應被稱為工價。所以稱之為工價是恰當的,因為永死是作為所欠的債,償還給魔鬼的惡毒。凡為罪當兵服役的,所領的糧餉就是死。惟有神的恩賜,在我們的主基督耶穌裡,乃是永生:就是你們如今所在的這恩典。同時當注意,他沒有說「義的工價」,因為義不是出於我們自己。所以義雖不是屬我們的,乃是屬恩典的,然而藉神的幫助得蒙保守,就在今生的年日過去之後賜下永生。第七章——弟兄們,你們豈不曉得嗎(我是對明白律法的人說的)?
1:146
Hinc incipit difficultatem legis ostendere, ut illos hortetur sine timore sub gratia vivere: quia modo actu cessante, lex nobis non vivit, sed sibi; et vivit in Novo Testamento, per quod reformatur. Quia lex in homine dominatur quanto tempore vivit. Nam quæ suo viro est mulier, vivente viro alligata est legi. Si autem mortuus fuerit vir, soluta est a lege viri. Comparationem inducit: mandatum legis dicit virum: plebem autem, vel animam, mulierem, ut ostendat legem, quae iram operatur, sine effectu, quasi mortuam, nobis jam mortificatis, impedire non posse quominus ejus esse possimus, qui a mortuis resurrexit: quæ merito nobis viveret, si inveniret quod puniret in nobis.
Here he begins to show the difficulty of the law, in order to exhort them to live without fear under grace: for now, its active force having ceased, the law does not live for us, but for itself; and it lives in the New Testament, through which it is reformed. Because the law has dominion over a man for as long as it lives. For the woman that has a husband is bound by the law to her husband while he lives. But if her husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. He introduces a comparison: by the 'husband' he means the commandment of the law; by the 'woman' he means the people, or the soul, so as to show that the law, which works wrath, being without effect, as it were dead — now that we are mortified — cannot hinder us from being able to belong to him who rose from the dead: which law would rightly live for us if it found in us something to punish.
在此他開始指明律法的難處,好勸他們在恩典之下無所懼怕地生活:因為如今律法的效力既已止息,律法就不再為我們而活,乃為自己而活;它活在新約裡,並藉新約得以更新。因為律法管轄人,是在人活著的時候。因為有丈夫的婦人,丈夫還活著,就被律法約束在丈夫身上;丈夫若死了,她就脫離了丈夫的律法。他引出一個比喻:他以「丈夫」指律法的誡命;以「婦人」指百姓或說魂,好顯明那惹動忿怒的律法既已失效、如同死了——既然我們已經向它治死——就不能攔阻我們歸屬那從死裡復活的主:這律法若在我們裡面找到甚麼可懲罰的,本來理當繼續向我們而活。
1:147
Tandiu enim dicit esse sub lege hominem, quandiu vivit in peccato. Hoc autem peccatum intelligendum est, quod accessit ex lege. Ubi enim non est gratia liberatoris, auget peccandi desiderium prohibitio peccatorum. Igitur vivente viro vocabitur adultera si fuerit cum alio viro: si autem mortuus fuerit vir ejus, liberata est a lege, ut non sit adultera, si fuerit cum alio viro. Quandiu vivit vir, tandiu ei secundum ejus necesse est vivere voluntatem. Si autem dormierit vir, et mulier alii fuerit juncta viro, jam non ei secundum prioris viri consuetudinem est vivendum. Itaque fratres mei et vos mortificati estis legi. Juxtacorpus noluit dicere, mortificata est vobis lex;
For he says that a man is under the law for as long as he lives in sin. But this sin is to be understood as that which came in by way of the law. For where there is not the grace of the liberator, the prohibition of sins increases the desire of sinning. Therefore, while her husband lives, she shall be called an adulteress if she be with another man; but if her husband be dead, she is freed from the law, so that she is not an adulteress if she be with another man. As long as the husband lives, so long must she live according to his will. But if the husband sleep, and the woman be joined to another husband, she must no longer live according to the custom of the former husband. Therefore, my brethren, you also are become dead to the law. Following the analogy of the body, he did not wish to say 'the law is dead to you;'
因為他說,人活在罪中多久,就在律法之下多久。但這罪當理解為那藉律法而進來的罪。因為哪裡沒有那位釋放者的恩典,對罪的禁令反倒增添了犯罪的慾望。所以,丈夫還活著的時候,她若與別人結合,就要稱為淫婦;丈夫若死了,她就脫離了律法,即或與別人結合,也不是淫婦。丈夫活著多久,她就必當照他的意思活多久。但丈夫若睡了,婦人若與別的男人結合,就不再照前夫的習慣而活了。所以我的弟兄們,你們也向律法死了。他按這身體的比喻,不願說「律法向你們死了」;
1:148
sed reliquit intellectui, sicut in multis locis. Juxta comparationem debuit dicere, magis illis legem mortuam quam ipsos legi, sed quod inter Judaeos dicere adhuc intractabile videbatur, intellectui derelinquit: satis evidenter ostendens, legem non potuisse auferre, sed potius auxisse peccatum, quod aufert gratia: quoniam lex jubere novit, cui succumbit infirmitas, non juvare, quod facit gratia Christi. Ab hoc loco, et tota ista lectione, usque: Quis liberabit me de corpore mortis hujus, videt Apostolus transfiguratum esse in se hominem sub lege positum, cujus verbis ex persona sua loquitur, et qui dixerat:
but he left it to the understanding, as in many places. According to the comparison, he ought rather to have said that the law was dead to them than that they were dead to the law; but because to say this among the Jews still seemed intractable, he left it to the understanding: showing plainly enough that the law was not able to take away sin, but rather increased it — the sin which grace takes away — since the law knows how to command, though weakness succumbs to it, but not how to help, which is the work of the grace of Christ. From this passage, and throughout this whole reading, up to 'Who shall deliver me from the body of this death,' the Apostle sees that a man placed under the law is transfigured into himself, in whose words he speaks in his own person, even the man who had said:
但他把這事留給人領會,正如在許多處一樣。按這比喻,他本應說律法向他們死了,而非他們向律法死了;但因為在猶太人中這樣說似乎仍難以叫人接受,他就留給人領會:夠清楚地顯明律法不能除去罪,反倒增添了罪——就是恩典所除去的那罪——因為律法只知吩咐,而軟弱的人卻在它面前屈服,律法卻不能幫助人,那幫助乃是基督恩典的工作。從這一段起,並貫穿這整段經文,直到「誰能救我脫離這取死的身體」,使徒看見那置身律法之下的人被轉化到他自己身上,他就用那人的話、以那人的身分說話,即那曾說:
1:149
Evacuali sumus a lege mortis, in qua detinebamur, ita ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litteræ. Per haec verba videtur legem reprehendisse, sed non ita est, quia subjecit: Lex peccatum est! Absit. et reliqua. Haec vero auricula est non mendax. Crucifixa carne, per quam nobis dominabatur damnando peccatum, jam actum non habet. Ante erant imitatores Moysi: nunc vero Christi; sic dictum est: Mortui estis legi, ac si diceretur, Mortui estis supplicio legis. Cur mortui sumus legi per corpus Christi, si bona est lex? Quia mortui sumus legi dominanti: liberati ab eo effectu quem lex punit et damnat. Usitatius enim vocatur lex, quando minatur et terret, ac vindicat.
We have been made void from the law of death, in which we were held, so that we may serve in newness of the spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter. Through these words he seems to have found fault with the law, but it is not so, because he added: 'Is the law sin? God forbid,' and the rest. This truly is an ear that does not lie. The flesh being crucified — through which sin had dominion over us by condemning — now has no active force. Formerly they were imitators of Moses; but now, of Christ; thus it is said, 'You are dead to the law,' as if it were said, 'You are dead to the punishment of the law.' Why are we dead to the law through the body of Christ, if the law is good? Because we are dead to the law that has dominion: freed from that effect which the law punishes and condemns. For it is more commonly called 'the law' when it threatens and terrifies and takes vengeance.
我們既在所被拘禁的死亡律法上被廢去,就得以在聖靈的新樣中服事,不在儀文的舊樣中。他藉這些話,似乎是責備律法,其實不然,因為他接著說:「這樣,律法是罪嗎?斷乎不是」等等。這實在是不說謊的耳朵。肉體既被釘十字架——罪從前藉肉體定人罪而轄制我們——如今就不再有效力。從前他們是效法摩西的,如今卻是效法基督;所以說「你們向律法死了」,就如同說「你們向律法的刑罰死了」。既然律法是善的,我們為何要藉基督的身體向律法死呢?因為我們是向那轄制人的律法死了:得以脫離律法所懲罰、所定罪的那效力。因為律法在威嚇、驚駭並施行報應之時,通常更被稱為「律法」。
1:150
Itaque idem præceptum timentibus lex est, amantibus gratia est. Per corpus Christi, commoriendo Christo, qui damnavit peccatum in carne. Ut sitis alterius qui ex mortuis resurrexit. Subaudiendum alterius viri. Ut fructificetis Deo. Fructificat cujus exemplo populus Dei crescit, sicut dicit: Ut aliquem fructum habeamus in vobis. Cum enim essemus in carne. Cum essemus in carnali conversatione, passio concupiscentiæ operabatur in oculis et caeteris membris, quae tamen per legem ostendebantur esse peccata, ut fructificarent morti peccati. In carne, inquit: id est carnalibus desideriis obstricti teneremur. Passiones peccatorum, quæ per legem erant, operabamur in membris nostris.
And so the same precept is law to those who fear, but grace to those who love. Through the body of Christ, by dying together with Christ, who condemned sin in the flesh. That you should belong to another who rose from the dead. 'Another husband' is to be understood. That you may bring forth fruit unto God. He brings forth fruit by whose example the people of God grows, as he says: 'That we may have some fruit among you.' For when we were in the flesh — when we were in a carnal manner of life — the passion of concupiscence wrought in the eyes and the other members, which passions were nevertheless shown by the law to be sins, that they might bring forth fruit unto the death of sin. 'In the flesh,' he says: that is, that we should be held bound by carnal desires. The passions of sins, which were by the law, wrought in our members.
如此同一條誡命,對懼怕的人是律法,對愛慕的人卻是恩典。藉著基督的身體,就是與基督同死,基督在肉體中定了罪案。使你們歸於那從死裡復活的另一位。這裡當補上「另一位丈夫」。使我們結果子歸給神。人結果子,就是神的百姓因他的榜樣得以增長,正如他說:「叫我可以在你們中間得些果子。」因為我們屬肉體的時候——就是我們過著屬肉體的生活的時候——那私慾的情慾在眼睛和其他肢體中發動,然而這些情慾藉律法顯明為罪,好叫它們結果子歸於罪的死亡。他說「屬肉體」,就是說我們被肉體的情慾捆綁束縛。那藉律法而發的罪的情慾,在我們肢體中發動。
1:151
Is passionibus moritur, qui jam mente servit legi Dei, quamvis passiones ipsæ necdum mortuæ sint. Auctam dicit concupiscentiam, cum lex prohibet. Augmentum concupiscentiæ de inhibitione, et reatum poenae de praevaricatione. Hoc est, quia per bonum operatum est mortem. Ut fructificarent morti. Id est, ut nos in iisdem passionibus positos legis severitas interficeret, et fructum morti de nostra perditione præberet, quia fructus peccati mors est. Fructificamus morti, dum prohibita facimus. Nunc autem soluti sumus a lege morientes. Lex mortis, quae occidit peccatores, id cst criminosos; sed et lex peccati ideo dicitur, non quia ipsa peccatum est, sed quia peccatoribus imponitur.
That man dies to these passions who already in mind serves the law of God, although the passions themselves are not yet dead. He says that concupiscence is increased when the law forbids it: an increase of concupiscence arising from the prohibition, and the guilt of punishment from the transgression. This is 'that through the good it wrought death.' 'That they might bring forth fruit unto death.' That is, that the severity of the law might slay us who were set in these same passions, and furnish fruit unto death out of our perdition, because the fruit of sin is death. We bring forth fruit unto death while we do the things forbidden. But now we are loosed from the law, dying. The law of death, which slays sinners, that is, the guilty; but it is also called the law of sin, not because it is itself sin, but because it is imposed upon sinners.
那已經在心思上服事神律法的人,就向這些情慾死了,雖然那些情慾本身尚未死去。他說當律法禁止之時,私慾反倒增長:私慾的增長是由於禁令,而刑罰的罪責是由於違犯。這就是「藉善而生出死來」。「好叫它們結果子歸於死亡。」就是說,律法的嚴厲要殺死我們這些置身於這些情慾中的人,並從我們的沉淪中生出死的果子來,因為罪的果子就是死。我們行那被禁止的事,就結果子歸於死亡。但如今我們既已死,就脫離了律法。這死亡的律法殺死罪人,就是有罪的人;但它也被稱為罪的律法,不是因為它本身是罪,乃是因為它加於罪人身上。
1:152
Ideo etiam mortis dicitur, quia stipendium peccati mors, aculeus autem mortis peccatum: virtus vero peccati lex. In qua detinebamur. Detinebamur per peccatum. lta ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate lilteræ. Spiritalis gratiae praeceptis obedientes, non litteram legis sequentes. Quid ergo dicemus, lex peccatum est? Quia dixerat, quod passiones per legem morti fructificarent, ideo sibi objicit, lex peccatum est? et respondet: Abati. Hoc facit contra Manichæos, qui Vetus Testamentum negant. Quod si dixerint: Ideo hic propter Judaeos asserit legem, quia timuit scandalum, respondendum est: Ergo semper timuit scandalum, quia nunquam contra legem locutus est.
Therefore it is also called the law of death, because the wages of sin is death, and the sting of death is sin, but the strength of sin is the law. 'In which we were held' — we were held through sin. 'So that we may serve in newness of the spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter' — obedient to the precepts of spiritual grace, not following the letter of the law. What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Because he had said that the passions through the law brought forth fruit unto death, therefore he raises the objection against himself: Is the law sin? And he answers: God forbid. He does this against the Manichaeans, who deny the Old Testament. And if they should say, 'He here asserts the law only because of the Jews, because he feared scandal,' it must be answered: Then he always feared scandal, because he never spoke against the law.
所以它也被稱為死亡的律法,因為罪的工價乃是死,死的毒鉤就是罪,罪的權勢就是律法。「我們在其中被拘禁」——我們是藉罪被拘禁。「使我們得以在聖靈的新樣中服事,不在儀文的舊樣中」——就是順服屬靈恩典的訓誨,不隨從律法的儀文。這樣,我們可說甚麼呢?律法是罪嗎?因為他曾說那些情慾藉律法結果子歸於死亡,所以他向自己提出反問:律法是罪嗎?他回答說:斷乎不是。他這樣做是為駁斥那否認舊約的摩尼教徒。他們若說:「他在此為猶太人的緣故才維護律法,是因懼怕跌人之事」,就當回答說:那麼他豈不是一直懼怕跌人之事,因為他從未反對過律法。
1:153
Cum ergo multis locis opera legis destruxerit, nunc merito in hoc eam laudat, in quo spiritalis est, et Manichæos ejus insinuatione confundit. Absit. Ne quis enim propter haec testimonia vituperet legem, et malam esse contendat, praevidit Apostolus male intelligentibus quid possit occurrere, eamdem sibi ipse proposuit quaestionem. Quid ergo dicimus, inquit: lex peccatum est? Absit. Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem. Hoc jam superius dixerat, per legem cognitio peccati. Non ergo ablatio, sed cognitio est.
Since therefore in many places he has overthrown the works of the law, now he rightly praises it in that respect in which it is spiritual, and by this commendation of it confounds the Manichaeans. God forbid. For lest anyone, on account of these testimonies, should disparage the law and contend that it is evil, the Apostle foresaw what might occur to those who misunderstand, and proposed to himself this same question. 'What shall we say then?' he says, 'Is the law sin? God forbid. But I did not know sin except through the law.' This he had already said above: 'through the law is the knowledge of sin.' It is therefore not the taking away of sin, but the knowledge of it.
既然他在許多處已經推翻了律法的行為,如今他在律法屬靈的那一面恰當地稱讚它,並藉這稱讚駁倒摩尼教徒。斷乎不是。因為恐怕有人因這些見證而貶低律法、力爭律法是惡的,使徒就預見到那誤解之人心中可能生出的念頭,便向自己提出這同一問題。他說:「這樣,我們可說甚麼呢?律法是罪嗎?斷乎不是。只是非因律法,我就不知何為罪。」這話他在前面已經說過:「藉律法乃是罪的知識。」所以律法不是除去罪,乃是使人知罪。
1:154
Quae ideo data est, non ut peccatum tolleret neque ut exstirparetur, sed tantum ut demonstraretur, ut quia peccatum sine gratia Dei vinci non potest, ipsa reatus sollicitudo cogat ad gratiam couvolare. Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem. Nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: Non concupisces. Hinc incipit Apostolus quasi de se dicere, et de se dare exemplum, qui sub lege vixerat, quae per se non salvat, sed ostendat peccatum; nam nec tollit, nec juslificat, sed in transgressoribus vindicat. Non ait, peccatum non feci, nisi per legem; sed, peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem, quae ostendit peccatum esse concupiscentiam: quod ego nesciebam esse peccatum.
For it was given, not that it might take away sin nor that it might root it out, but only that it might be revealed; so that, since sin cannot be overcome without the grace of God, the very anxiety of guilt might compel a man to flee for refuge to grace. 'But I did not know sin except through the law. For I had not known concupiscence, unless the law had said: You shall not covet.' Here the Apostle begins to speak as it were of himself, and to give an example from himself — he who had lived under the law, which of itself does not save, but reveals sin; for it neither takes away nor justifies, but takes vengeance upon transgressors. He does not say, 'I did not commit sin except through the law,' but, 'I did not know sin except through the law,' which showed that concupiscence is sin — a thing which I did not know to be sin.
因為律法賜下,不是要除去罪,也不是要根除罪,乃只是要顯明罪;使人既知道罪若無神的恩典就不能勝過,那罪責的憂懼便迫使人逃奔恩典。「只是非因律法,我就不知何為罪。非律法說『不可起貪心』,我就不知何為貪心。」在此使徒開始彷彿論到自己,並從自己身上舉出例子——他曾活在律法之下,而律法本身並不拯救人,只顯明罪;因為律法既不除罪,也不稱人為義,只向違犯的人施行報應。他不說「非因律法,我就不會犯罪」,乃說「非因律法,我就不知何為罪」,因律法顯明貪心就是罪——這事是我從前所不知其為罪的。
1:155
Concupiscentiam, inquit, nesciebam. Non dixit: Non habe-, bam, aut non faciebam, sed nesciebam esse peccatum. Unde apparet concupiscentiam per legem non insitam, sed demonstratam, quae docet quid quisque facere debeat, vel vitare. Sed verus homo adhuc trahitur consuetudine delinquendi: concupiscentia enim nostrae naturae est, accedens per peccatum, non Dei conditio. Et ideo malum ipsum non Dei disjunctione separandum, sed Dei miseratione sanandum est. Occasione autem accepta. Hinc Apostolus praeteritam vitam suam, quando sub lege vivebat, et adolescentiæ suae pugnam commemorat. Et quod ait: Ego autem vivebam sine lege, primam suam aetatem insinuat:
'I did not know concupiscence,' he says. He did not say, 'I did not have it' or 'I did not do it,' but 'I did not know it to be sin.' Whence it appears that concupiscence was not implanted by the law, but revealed by it — the law which teaches what each one ought to do or to avoid. But the true man is still dragged along by the habit of transgressing: for concupiscence belongs to our nature, coming in through sin, not by God's constitution. And therefore that evil itself is not to be separated by any sundering from God, but to be healed by the mercy of God. But taking occasion. Here the Apostle recalls his past life, when he was living under the law, and the struggle of his youth. And when he says, 'But I was alive without the law once,' he indicates his earliest age:
他說「我不知何為貪心」。他不說「我沒有貪心」或「我沒有起貪心」,乃說「我不知貪心是罪」。由此可見貪心不是律法所植入的,乃是律法所顯明的——律法教導各人當行甚麼、當避甚麼。但真實的人仍被犯罪的積習拖著走:因為貪心屬於我們的本性,是藉罪進來的,並非神所造之初的構造。所以那惡本身不當藉與神隔絕來除去,乃當藉神的憐憫得醫治。趁著機會。在此使徒追想他從前活在律法之下的生活,並他青年時的爭戰。當他說「從前沒有律法,我是活著的」,他所指的是他最幼小的年歲:
1:156
Adveniente, inquit, mandato, peccatum revixit. Ego autem mortuus sum: jam se praecepti capacem, sed non efficacem fuisse testatur. Et ideo ut praevaricatorem se legis ostenderet, in quibus interioribus talem se fuisse sciebat Apostolus ante gratiam Dei, quae per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum est. Et ad Ephesios hoc apertissime confitetur: In quibus, inquit, ut nos omnes conversati sumus, in desideriis carnis et cogitationum: et eramus natura filii iMae, sicut et caeteri, et reliqua. Et ad Titum: Fuimus et nos, inquit, aliquando stulti et increduli, errantes, et reliqua quæ ibi sequuntur. Talis ante gratiam fuit. Peccatum per mandatum operatum est.
'But when the commandment came,' he says, 'sin revived; but I died.' He testifies that he was already capable of the precept, but not effective in it. And so, that he might show himself a transgressor of the law, the Apostle knew that inwardly he had been such before the grace of God, which is through Jesus Christ our Lord. And to the Ephesians he confesses this most openly: 'Among whom,' he says, 'we all also had our conversation in times past, in the desires of the flesh and of our thoughts: and we were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest,' and so on. And to Titus: 'For we ourselves also,' he says, 'were sometime foolish, unbelieving, erring,' and the rest that follows there. Such was he before grace. Sin wrought through the commandment.
他說:「誡命一來,罪又活了;但我死了。」他見證自己已經能領受誡命,卻不能將它實行。所以,為要顯明自己是違犯律法的人,使徒知道在藉我們的主耶穌基督而來的神恩典之前,他裡面曾是這樣的人。他對以弗所人極其坦白地承認這事:他說:「我們從前也都在他們中間,放縱肉體的私慾和心中所喜好的而行,本為可怒之子,和別人一樣」等等。他對提多也說:「我們從前也是無知、悖逆、受迷惑的」,以及那裡接下去的話。他在恩典之前正是如此。罪藉著誡命發動了。
1:157
Sicut qui iovidet, tunc magis occasionem nocendi accipit, quando ei cui nocere vult, aliquid creditur. In me omnem concupiscentiam. Omnem quae scripta est in lege: Non concupisces uxorem, neque agrum, neque quidquam proximi tui, et reliqua. Habet hoc per transgressionem humanae mentis infirmitas, ut difficilius observari possint prohibita. Sine lege enim peccatum mortuum erat: id est, latebat, non apparebat, ignorabatur, mihi mortuum videbatur: vel in oblivionem erat naturalis lex, quæ ostendebat quid esset peccatum. Ideo et lex data est litterae, quae commemoraret legem naturae. Ego autem vivebam aliquando. Quasi justus et liber a peccato vivere mihi videbar. Sine lege.
Just as one who envies then all the more receives occasion for doing harm, when something is entrusted to the one whom he wishes to harm. 'In me all concupiscence' — all that is written in the law: 'You shall not covet your neighbour's wife, nor his field, nor anything of your neighbour's,' and the rest. The weakness of the human mind has this quality, through transgression, that things forbidden can be observed with greater difficulty. For without the law sin was dead: that is, it lay hidden, it did not appear, it was unknown, it seemed to me to be dead; or the natural law, which showed what sin was, had fallen into oblivion. Therefore the law was also given in writing, to bring the law of nature to remembrance. 'But I was alive once' — I seemed to myself to live as one just and free from sin. 'Without the law.'
正如嫉妒人的,當有東西託付給他所要加害的那人時,他就更得著加害的機會。「在我裡面各樣的貪心」——就是律法上所寫的一切:「不可貪戀鄰舍的妻子,也不可貪戀他的田地,並你鄰舍一切所有的」等等。人心的軟弱因著違犯有這樣的特性,就是那被禁止的事更難以遵守。因為沒有律法,罪是死的:就是說,罪潛藏著,不顯露,無人知曉,在我看來似乎是死的;或說那顯明何為罪的自然律已被遺忘。所以律法又用文字賜下,好叫人記起本性的律法。「但我從前是活著的」——我自以為活得像個公義、脫離罪的人。「沒有律法」。
1:158
Unde manifestat, non ex persona sua proprie, sed generaliter ex persona hominis loqui. Sed cum venisset mandatum: id est, in oblivionem venerat esse peccatum; at ubi venit mandatum, recognitum est peccatam, ut omnis qui illud fecerit, mortuum se esse cognoscat. Revixit. Id est, enituit et apparuit. Revixit, ait: non vixit; vixerat enim aliquando in Paradiso, quando contra datum praeceptum satis apparebat admissum. Peccatum rexit, ego autem mortuus sum. Hoc est, apparuit quod fuerat occultum, quia vixerat per scientiam naturalem, et mortuum fuerat per oblivionem: quia prævaricatus suin jam sciens, et Dortuum me esse peccatt manifestatione perspexi:
Whence he makes it plain that he speaks not properly in his own person, but generally in the person of man. 'But when the commandment came' — that is, it had come to be that sin was in oblivion; but when the commandment came, sin was recognized, so that everyone who has done it may know himself to be dead. 'Revived.' That is, it shone forth and appeared. 'Revived,' he says, not 'lived'; for it had once lived in Paradise, when what was committed against the given precept was plainly enough manifest. 'Sin revived, but I died.' That is, that which had been hidden appeared, because it had lived through natural knowledge and had been dead through oblivion: because I, now knowing, transgressed, and I perceived myself to be dead by the manifestation of sin:
由此他表明,他並非本身以自己的身分說話,乃是普遍地以人的身分說話。「但誡命一來」——就是說,罪原已被遺忘;但誡命一來,罪就被認出來,以致凡行這罪的人都可知道自己是死的。「又活了」。就是說,罪顯露出來、顯現出來了。他說「又活了」,而非「活了」;因為罪從前在樂園中曾活過一次,那時違背所賜誡命之事夠明顯地顯露出來。「罪又活了,我卻死了。」就是說,那先前隱藏的顯露出來,因為罪曾藉本性的知識活過,又曾藉遺忘而死了:因為我如今既知道還去違犯,就藉罪的顯明看出自己是死的:
1:159
quia jam praevaricatione peccat, qui videt per legem quid facere non debeat, et tamen facit sive titillatione, sive delectatione, etsi non consensione: vel quia reatus praevaricationis certum mortis supplicium comminatur. Et inventum est mihi mandatum. Quod custoditum proficiebat ad vitam, hoc neglectum perdunt ad mortem: quia sciens illud non custodivi. Hoc totum ideo, ut ostendat legem quidem datam ad vitam, sed quia non dedit adjutorium, quomodo possimus salvari, ut nos deducat ad gratiam, quæ totum habet, et misericordiam, et adjutorium, et exemplum. Quod erat ad vitam, hoc esse ad mortem. Si vis ad vitam venire, serva mandata. Custoditum mandatum vitam tribuit:
because he now sins by way of transgression who sees through the law what he ought not to do, and yet does it — whether by titillation, or by delight, even if not by consent; or because the guilt of transgression threatens him with the certain punishment of death. 'And the commandment was found by me.' That which, being kept, made progress unto life, this, being neglected, they lose unto death: because, knowing it, I did not keep it. All this is that he may show that the law was indeed given unto life, but because it gave no help whereby we might be saved, that it might lead us to grace, which has everything — mercy, help, and example. 'That which was unto life, this proved to be unto death.' If you wish to come unto life, keep the commandments. The commandment kept bestows life;
因為人藉律法既看見自己不當行甚麼,卻仍去行,他就是藉違犯而犯罪——無論是出於挑動,或出於喜悅,即或不是出於首肯;又或因違犯的罪責以必然的死刑威嚇他。「那誡命我就尋見了。」那遵守就使人向著生命長進的,若忽略了,人就向著死亡把它失去了:因為我明知卻不遵守。這一切都是要顯明律法固然是為生命而賜下,卻因它不能提供我們得救的幫助,就叫它領我們歸於恩典,那恩典無所不備——有憐憫、有幫助、有榜樣。「那本為叫人得生命的,反倒成了叫人死亡的。」你若願意得生命,就當遵守誡命。誡命被遵守,就賜下生命;
1:160
non custoditum, mortem, quae transgressio est. Nam peccatum occasione accepta. Si quid contra legem videtur dicere, eis imputat, qui perfectiora accipere non valuerunt. Ideo occasionem dixit fuisse peccati. Per mandatum. Quia suasio delinquendi ad peccatum vehementior est, cum adest prohibitio: et non solum peccatorem, sed et transgressorem facit. Quia ergo ab hominibos nondum spiritalem gratiam accipientibus suavius admittitur quod vetatur, fallit peccatum 'falsa dulcedine: quia vero accidit reatus prævaricationis, et occidit: quia pretium mortiferæ voluptatis amplectitur dulcedinem illam qua fallitur, et delectatur etiam contra legem facere: et tanto magis libet, quanto minus licet.
if not kept, death — which is transgression. For sin, taking occasion. If he seems to say anything against the law, he imputes it to those who were not able to receive more perfect things. Therefore he said there was an occasion of sin. Through the commandment. Because the persuasion to transgress is more vehement unto sin when the prohibition is present, and it makes a man not only a sinner but also a transgressor. Because, then, by men not yet receiving spiritual grace, what is forbidden is admitted more agreeably, sin deceives by a false sweetness: but because the guilt of transgression comes upon it, it also slays — because it embraces, as the price of deadly pleasure, that sweetness by which it is deceived, and it delights even to act against the law: and the less it is permitted, the more it pleases.
若不遵守,就是死——就是違犯。因為罪趁著機會。他若似乎說出甚麼反對律法的話,就把這歸咎於那些不能領受更完全之事的人。所以他說有犯罪的機會。藉著誡命。因為當禁令臨在時,那勸人違犯的引誘就更加猛烈地導向罪,且不但使人成為罪人,也使人成為違犯者。因為在那些尚未領受屬靈恩典的人中,被禁止的事更叫人樂於接納,罪就用虛假的甘甜欺哄人:但因違犯的罪責臨到,罪就也殺人——因為人以那欺哄他的甘甜作為致死之樂的代價來擁抱它,甚至以違背律法為樂:越是不許可,就越叫人喜歡。
1:161
Seduxit me, et per illud occidit. Neque enim nullum peccatum, nisi concupiscendo cotnmittitur. Proinde quae hoc prohibet, bona et laudabilis lex est. Sed ubi sanctus adjuvat Spiritus, inspirans pro concupiscentia mala concupiscentiam bonam, hoc est charitatem diffundens in cordibus nostris, profecto illa lex quamvis bona auget prohibendo desiderium malum. Sicut aquæ impetus si in eam partem non cesset Onere, vehementior fit obice opposito, cujus molem cum evicerit majori cumulo præcipitatus violentius per prona provolvitur. Nescio quo enim modo Loc ipsum quod concupiscitur, fit jucundius dum vetatur. Et hoc cst quod fallit peccatum per mandatum, et per illud occidit:
'It seduced me, and by it slew me.' For there is no sin except that which is committed by coveting. Accordingly, the law which forbids this is good and praiseworthy. But where the Holy Spirit helps, breathing in a good concupiscence in place of the evil one — that is, pouring forth charity in our hearts — surely that law, however good, increases evil desire by forbidding it. Just as the impetus of water, if the burden does not cease on that side, becomes more vehement when an obstacle is set against it; and when it has overcome that mass, being hurled headlong with greater accumulation, it rushes down more violently along the slopes. For somehow this very thing which is coveted becomes more delightful while it is forbidden. And this is what sin does — it deceives through the commandment, and by it slays:
「它就引誘我,並藉它殺了我。」因為除了藉貪戀而犯的以外,並沒有別的罪。因此禁止這事的律法乃是善的、可稱讚的。但當聖靈幫助人,吹入善的心願來代替那惡的心願——就是將愛澆灌在我們心裡——那律法縱然是善的,卻的確藉禁止而增添惡慾。正如水的沖力,若那一邊的壓力不止息,一旦有障礙攔在其前,就變得更加猛烈;當它勝過那障礙之時,就以更大的堆積猛然傾瀉,順著坡勢更加暴烈地奔流而下。因為不知怎地,那被貪戀之物在被禁止時反倒變得更叫人喜悅。這就是罪所做的——它藉誡命欺哄人,並藉它殺人:
1:162
Cum accidit etiam prævaricatio, quae nuila est. Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum et justum. Contra iuipugnatores legis, et contra eos qui justitiam a bonitate secernunt, lex et sancta et bona dicitur, et gratia justa. Nisi enim abundaverit justitia vestra, et reliqua. Sed et Deus in Veteri Testamento nonnunquam bonus, et in NoVo dicitur justus: ut cst illud, Pater juste. Et hoc contra Marcionistas: tamen nihil ex ea recte fit sine gratia, quia non est data quae possit vivificare, sed prævaricationis causa posita eSt; ut convictos concluderet sub peccato, non justificandis impiis, sed convincendis superbis prævaricationis causa posita. Et contra Manichaeos est, quia laudatur;
when transgression also comes upon it, which is nought. And so the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just. Against the assailants of the law, and against those who separate righteousness from goodness, the law is called both holy and good, and grace is called just. For 'unless your righteousness shall abound,' and the rest. But God is sometimes called good in the Old Testament, and in the New is called just: as is that saying, 'Just Father.' And this is against the Marcionites. Yet nothing is rightly done through the law without grace, because it was not given as something that could give life, but was set down as a cause of transgression; that it might shut up those convicted under sin — not for the justifying of the impious, but for the convicting of the proud, being set down as a cause of transgression. And it is against the Manichaeans, because it is praised;
當違犯也臨到它時,那違犯是虛無的。如此,律法固然是聖的,誡命也是聖的、公義的。針對那攻擊律法的人,並針對那將公義與良善分開的人,律法既被稱為聖的,又被稱為善的,恩典也被稱為公義的。因為「你們的義若不勝於……」等等。但神在舊約中有時被稱為善的,在新約中被稱為公義的:如那句話「公義的父」。這是針對馬吉安派的。然而若無恩典,藉律法就沒有一件事能行得正,因為律法賜下並不是要作能賜生命之物,乃是作違犯的緣由;為要把那些被定罪的人圈在罪裡——不是為稱不敬虔者為義,乃是為叫驕傲的人被定罪而設立作違犯的緣由。這也是針對摩尼教徒的,因為律法受了稱讚;
1:163
et contra Pelagianos, quia nemo ex lege justificatur; et ideo vivificandis eis quos littera occidit, spiritus gratiæ gratis opiLulatur. Nam nihil ex ea recte fit, sicut dictum est, sine gratia: quia non est data quæ possit vivificare. Et bonum. Custodien-; tibns. Quod ergo bonum eat, mihi factum est mors? Absit. Non mihi mandatum per se causa mortis exstitit; sed ego mihi facio qui peccando morte digna committo. In male utente quippe vilium est, non in mandato ipso, quod bonum est, quoniam bona est lex. Sed peccatum, ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum eat mortem. Per legem apparet peccatum, et per ipsam punitur.
and against the Pelagians, because no one is justified by the law; and therefore, for the giving of life to those whom the letter slays, the spirit of grace freely brings aid. For nothing is rightly done through it, as has been said, without grace: because it was not given as something that could give life. And good — to those who keep it. Was then that which is good made death to me? God forbid. It was not the commandment itself that of itself became the cause of death to me; but I make it so for myself, who by sinning commit things worthy of death. In him who uses it ill, indeed, is the fault, not in the commandment itself, which is good, since the law is good. But sin, that it might appear as sin, through the good wrought death in me. Through the law sin appears, and through the same it is punished.
這也是針對伯拉糾派的,因為沒有人靠律法稱義;因此,為要把生命賜給那些被儀文所殺的人,恩典的靈就白白地施予幫助。因為如所說的,若無恩典,藉律法就沒有一件事能行得正:因為律法賜下並非作能賜生命之物。而是善的——對那遵守它的人。那麼那善的反倒成了叫我死的嗎?斷乎不是。不是那誡命本身自然而然成了叫我死的緣由;乃是我自己使它如此,因為我犯罪,行了那當死的事。過錯確是在那誤用律法的人身上,不在那誡命本身,因誡命是善的,律法是善的。乃是罪,為要顯出是罪,就藉那善的在我裡面生出死來。藉律法罪就顯明,也藉律法罪受懲罰。
1:164
Ergo per bonum, id est, per legem, quae bona est, si quis ea legitime utatur, mihi operatur mortem, cum ejus transgressor efficior. Ut fiat supra modum peccans peccatum per mandatum. Iniquitatis exigit magnitudo ut homo jam non peccator, sed peccatum vocetur. Ante legem modum habebat peccati appetitus per ignorantiam: supra modum est quod scienter admittitur. Scimus enim. Id est, quod lex ardua, sed spiritalia praecipit, sed ege cum juxta carnalem consuetudinem titillor, ab ejus perfectione dissentio, perfecta perimit imperfectum. Quod lex spiritalis est. Expositum est hoc. Mandat quæ spiritus sunt opera: unde ostendit non posse impleri legem, nisi ab spiritali. Ego autem carnalis sum.
Therefore through the good — that is, through the law, which is good if one uses it lawfully — it works death in me, when I am made a transgressor of it. That sin might become sinning above measure through the commandment. The greatness of iniquity requires that man be now called not a sinner but sin itself. Before the law the appetite for sin had a measure, through ignorance; that which is knowingly committed is above measure. For we know. That is, that the law commands things arduous, but spiritual; but I, since I am titillated according to carnal habit, dissent from its perfection — the perfect destroys the imperfect. That the law is spiritual. This has been expounded. It commands the works which are of the spirit: whence he shows that the law cannot be fulfilled except by a spiritual man. But I am carnal.
所以,藉那善的——就是藉那善的律法,人若合法地使用它,它就是善的——當我成了違犯它的人時,它就在我裡面生出死來。使罪藉誡命顯得罪大惡極。罪孽之大,以致要稱人不再為罪人,乃是罪的本身。在律法以先,犯罪的慾望因無知還有節制;那明知而犯的就過了節制。因為我們曉得。就是說,律法所吩咐的是艱難的,卻是屬靈的事;但我既照肉體的習慣被挑動,就與它的完全相違——那完全的除滅那不完全的。律法乃是屬靈的。這話已經解說過了。律法吩咐那屬靈的工作:由此他顯明,律法非藉屬靈的人就不能成全。但我是屬肉體的。
1:165
Qui legem accipio, consuevi carnaliter vivere: id est, carni consentiens, nondum spirituali gratia liberatus. Bonum est enim non concupiscere: et hoc bonum vult justus, qui ex flde vivit, et tamen facit quod odit, quia concupiscit, quamvis post concupiscentias suas non eat. Quod si fecerit, tunc vere ipse facit, ut cedat, ut consentiat, ut desiderio peccati obediat. Venundatus sub pescato. Id est pretium temporalis voluptatis. Inter vendentem autem et ementem hoc loco istud probatur esse commercium. Proponit inimicus iniquitatis consilium, et accipit voluntatis assensum. Accipio ergo amissae innocentiæ pretium, ipsam peccandi voluptatem ac mortiferam de iniqua suavitate dulcedinem.
I who receive the law am accustomed to live carnally: that is, consenting to the flesh, not yet freed by spiritual grace. For it is good not to covet: and this good the just man wills, who lives by faith, and yet does what he hates, because he covets, although he does not go after his concupiscences. But if he does so, then truly he himself does it — so as to yield, so as to consent, so as to obey the desire of sin. Sold under sin. That is, the price of temporal pleasure. Between the seller and the buyer, in this place, this is proved to be the transaction. The enemy proposes the counsel of iniquity, and receives the assent of the will. I therefore receive, as the price of lost innocence, the very pleasure of sinning and the deadly sweetness from an unjust delight.
我這領受律法的人,習慣了照肉體而活:就是說,順從肉體,尚未被屬靈的恩典釋放。因為不起貪心乃是善的:這善是那憑信德而活的義人所願意的,然而他仍行他所恨惡的,因為他起了貪心,雖然他並不隨從他的私慾。但他若這樣行,那就真是他自己去行了——以致屈服、以致首肯、以致順服罪的慾望。被賣給罪了。就是說,付上暫時之樂的代價。在此處,賣者與買者之間顯明有這樣一樁交易。仇敵提出不義的計謀,並得著意志的贊同。於是我便接受那失去的無辜之代價,就是那犯罪之樂本身,並那從不義的甘美而來的致死甘甜。
1:166
Venundati, inquit, estis peccatis vestris, ne quisquam eum nondum redemptum Christi sanguine existimet; sed redemptionem, iJ est immortalitatem exspectat. Vel venundatum sub pcccato in prima transgressione præcepti, ut haberet corpus corruptibile, quod aggravat animam. Nunc vero, tanquam emptum mancipium, cogitur servire libidini. Quod enim operor non intelligo. Nunquid non intelligo malum esse quod invitus admitto ? quomodo non intelligit qui hoc agit quod non vult, etquododit, illud facit? Non parvum intelligentiae indicium est, odisse delictum: ergo quod operor non intelligo, id est, non consentio, non approbo, non facio, et quamlibet victus contrarium esse decerno:
'You have been sold to your sins,' he says, lest anyone should suppose him not yet redeemed by the blood of Christ; but he awaits redemption, that is, immortality. Or 'sold under sin' in the first transgression of the precept, so that he might have a corruptible body, which weighs down the soul. But now, like a bought slave, he is compelled to serve lust. For what I work, I understand not. Do I not understand that to be evil which I unwillingly admit? How does he not understand who does that which he does not will, and does that which he hates? It is no small sign of understanding to hate one's fault: therefore 'what I work, I understand not' — that is, I do not consent, I do not approve, I do not do it, and however overcome, I judge it to be contrary:
他說「你們被賣給你們的罪了」,免得有人以為他尚未被基督的血救贖;然而他乃是等候救贖,就是不朽壞。或說在初次違犯誡命時「被賣給罪」,以致他有了必朽壞的身體,這身體叫魂沉重。但如今,他像被買來的奴隸,被迫服事情慾。因為我所作的,我自己不明白。我豈不明白那我不情願去犯的乃是惡的嗎?那行自己所不願、且行自己所恨惡之事的人,怎能說是不明白呢?恨惡自己的過錯,這乃是明白的一大明證:所以「我所作的,我自己不明白」——就是說,我不首肯、不贊同、不去行,縱然被勝過,我仍判定它是相反的:
1:167
et rectum non esse evidenter intelligo, non agnosco esse in praeceptis veritatis. Non enim quod volo bonum, hoc ago. Huc usque sunt verha hominis, ut aliqui putant, sub lege constituti, nondum sub gratia: ut aliquis etiamsi nolit peccare, vincitur a peccato, invaluit enim consnetudo carnalis, et naturale vinculum mortalitatis. Ne forte ex his verbis quispiam consentire carnii concupiscentiæ ad opera mala S. Apostolum suspicetur, sed consideret quod adjunxit: Si autem quod nolo, hoc facio, consentio legi, quoniam bona est: magis enim se dicit legi consentire, quam carnis concupiscentiae: banc enim peccati nomine appellat.
and I clearly understand it not to be right, I do not acknowledge it to be among the precepts of truth. For what I will, that good, I do not. Up to this point these are the words of a man, as some think, set under the law, not yet under grace: so that a man, even if he be unwilling to sin, is overcome by sin, for carnal habit has grown strong, and the natural bond of mortality. Lest perhaps from these words anyone should suspect the holy Apostle of consenting to the concupiscence of the flesh unto evil works, let him consider what he added: 'But if I do that which I will not, I consent to the law, that it is good': for he says that he rather consents to the law than to the concupiscence of the flesh — for this he calls by the name of sin.
我清楚明白它是不對的,不承認它列在真理的訓誨之中。因為我所願意的善,我反不作。有些人認為,直到這裡都是那置身律法之下、尚未在恩典之下的人所說的話:以致人即或不願犯罪,仍被罪勝過,因為肉體的積習已經根深蒂固,加上必死之本性的束縛。恐怕有人因這些話疑心這位聖使徒是首肯肉體的私慾去行惡事,就讓他思想他所加上的話:「若我所作的,是我所不願意的,我就承認律法是善的」:因為他說他寧可順服律法,而非順服肉體的私慾——他把這私慾稱為罪。
1:168
Facere ergo se dixit, non affectu consentiendi et implendi, sed ipso motu concupiscendi. Sed quod odio malum, illud facio. Bonum est enim non concupiseere: et hoc bonum vult justus, qui ex fide vivit, et tamen facit quod odit, quia coucupiscit, quamvis post concupiscenlias non eat: quod si fecerit, tunc vere ipse facit ut cedat, ut consentiat, ut desiderio peccati obediat. Si autem quod odio, illud facio. Id est, dum nolo facere quod committo, utique cum lege concordo, quae mala et non vult, et prohibet; ideoque ei mente consentio, opere contradico, atque ita aliud in me conscientia aliud infirmitas agit, quæ jugo peccati, judicio contradicente, succumbit;
He said therefore that he 'does' it, not by the disposition of consenting and fulfilling, but by the very motion of coveting. But the evil which I hate, that I do. For it is good not to covet: and this good the just man wills, who lives by faith, and yet does what he hates, because he covets, although he does not go after his concupiscences: but if he does so, then truly he himself does it, so as to yield, so as to consent, so as to obey the desire of sin. But if what I hate, that I do. That is, while I am unwilling to do what I commit, I certainly agree with the law, which neither wills the evil nor forbids it; and therefore I consent to it in mind but contradict it in deed, and thus one thing conscience works in me, another thing weakness, which succumbs to the yoke of sin, though judgment contradicts;
所以他說他「去作」,不是憑首肯與成全的意向,乃是憑貪戀的那股衝動。但我所恨惡的惡,我倒去作。因為不起貪心乃是善的:這善是那憑信德而活的義人所願意的,然而他仍行他所恨惡的,因為他起了貪心,雖然他並不隨從他的私慾:但他若這樣行,那就真是他自己去行了,以致屈服、以致首肯、以致順服罪的慾望。若我所恨惡的,我倒去作。就是說,當我不願去作我所犯的事時,我自然與律法相合,因律法既不願那惡,也禁止那惡;所以我在心思上首肯律法,在行為上卻與它相違,如此我裡面良心作一事,軟弱作另一事,那軟弱雖有判斷相違,卻仍屈服於罪的軛下;
1:169
facere ergo se dixit, et operari, non affectu consentiendi et implendi, sed ipso motu concupiscendi. Consentio legi, quoniam bona est. Quia nolo quod non vult, conscientiae lege ei consentio: quia quod nolo facio. Nunc autem. Nunc jam sub gratia, quae me liberavit a consensione. Jam non ego operor illud. Id est, non consentio. Nam si et concupiscit et consentit, et agit, quomodo non ipse illud operatur? etiamsi se ipse operari doleat, et vinci graviter ingemiscat. Non ego operor: hoc est, non interior mens: nec consentio exhibere membra mea arma iniquitatis. Antequam lex prohiberet, libens ipse faciebam; sed postquam lex venit, invitus pecco, quia consuetudine vincor.
he said therefore that he 'does' and 'works' it, not by the disposition of consenting and fulfilling, but by the very motion of coveting. I consent to the law, that it is good. Because I do not will what it does not will, I consent to it by the law of conscience: because what I will not, that I do. But now. Now already under grace, which has freed me from consent. Now it is no more I that work it. That is, I do not consent. For if he both covets and consents and acts, how does he not himself work it? Even though he himself grieves to work it, and groans heavily at being overcome. 'It is no more I that work it': that is, not the inner mind: nor do I consent to present my members as weapons of iniquity. Before the law forbade, I did it willingly of myself; but after the law came, I sin unwillingly, because I am overcome by habit.
所以他說他「去作」並「行」,不是憑首肯與成全的意向,乃是憑貪戀的那股衝動。我承認律法是善的。因為我不願律法所不願的,我就憑良心的律法首肯它:因為我所不願的,我倒去作。但如今。如今已在恩典之下,恩典已使我脫離首肯。如今就不再是我作那事了。就是說,我不首肯。因為他若既貪戀、又首肯、又去行,怎能說不是他自己作的呢?縱然他自己以作這事為憂,並因被勝過而沉重歎息。「就不再是我作的」:就是說,不是那裡面的心思:我也不首肯獻上肢體作不義的兵器。在律法禁止以先,我甘心自願去作;但律法一來,我就不情願地犯罪,因為我被積習所勝。
1:170
Sed quod habitat in me peccatum. Habitat quasi hospes, et dominatur, et quasi aliud in alio non quasi unum habiiat in me adhuc carnalis affectus. Scio enim quia jam non habitat in me. Ex eo quod scit, consentit legi: ex eo quod facit, cedit peccato: ut in me ita prævaleat, quasi innatum videatur: quod quidem non a Deo conditum, sed ex vitiata natura procedit. Hic incipit dicere, quod ipse titillationem carnis habuit. Notandum etiam quod titillationem ipsam Apostolus se sensisse testetur. Hoc est in carne mea bonum. Non dixit: Caro mea non est bona: sed bonum in carne mea non habitat, quam peccati deprimit consuetudo, quod vincere nequeo:
But it is sin that dwells in me. It dwells as a guest, and lords it, and as one thing in another — not as one — the still carnal affection dwells in me. For I know that it dwells no more in me. From what he knows, he consents to the law; from what he does, he yields to sin: so that it prevails in me as though it seemed inborn — which indeed is not constituted by God, but proceeds from a vitiated nature. Here he begins to say that he himself had the titillation of the flesh. It is also to be noted that the Apostle testifies that he felt that very titillation. That is, in my flesh — good. He did not say, 'My flesh is not good,' but 'good does not dwell in my flesh,' which the habit of sin depresses, a thing which I am unable to overcome:
惟有住在我裡面的罪。它像客旅一樣居住,並且轄制,且如一物住在另一物中——並非如同一體——那仍屬肉體的情感住在我裡面。因為我知道它不再住在我裡面。從他所知道的,他就首肯律法;從他所行的,他就向罪屈服:以致罪在我裡面得勢,彷彿是與生俱來的——這罪確非神所造,乃是出於敗壞的本性。在此他開始說他自己曾有肉體的挑動。也當注意,使徒見證他自己感覺到那挑動。就是說,在我肉體之中——善。他不說「我的肉體不是善的」,乃說「善不住在我肉體之中」,這是罪的積習所壓制的,是我所不能勝過的:
1:171
quia dum de opere legis conlido, gratiæ adjutorium non requiro. Hoc autem quod inhabitat, ex traduce mortalitatis per transgressorem in omnes homines venit. Nam velle adjacet mihi. Est quidem in me voluntas aDeo praeparata atque donata, sed non est effectus: quia carualis consuetudo voluntati ipsi resistit, adhuc in ista vita mortali. Aliqui æstimant quod voces istae sint hominis sub lege constitui, nondum sub gratia. Perficere autem bonum non invenio. Sine adminiculo gratiae non invenio bonæ voluntatis effectum. Nam ut velle sit, jam voluntas a Deo præparata est: quia ipse est qui in nobis operatur et velle. Et hoc notandum, quod non dixit: Facere bonum non invenio, sed perficere:
because, while I confide in the work of the law, I do not seek the help of grace. But this which indwells came into all men from the propagation of mortality through the transgressor. For to will is present with me. There is indeed in me a will prepared and given by God, but there is not the effect: because carnal habit resists the will itself, still in this mortal life. Some judge that these are the words of a man set under the law, not yet under grace. But to accomplish that which is good, I find not. Without the support of grace I find not the effect of good will. For that there is a willing, the will has already been prepared by God: because it is he who works in us even to will. And this too is to be noted, that he did not say, 'To do good I find not,' but 'to accomplish':
因為當我倚靠律法的行為時,就不尋求恩典的幫助。但這住在裡面的,是藉那違犯者,從必死本性的繁衍臨到眾人的。因為立志為善由得我。在我裡面確有神所預備並賜下的意志,卻沒有果效:因為肉體的積習抵擋那意志本身,這是在今生必死的生命中仍然如此。有些人認為這些是那置身律法之下、尚未在恩典之下的人所說的話。只是行出來由不得我。若無恩典的扶助,我就尋不著善意的果效。因為既有立志,那意志已是神所預備的:因為是神在我們裡面運行,使我們立志。這也當注意,他不說「行善由不得我」,乃說「成全」:
1:172
quæ est enim perfectio boni, nisi exstinctio maii ? Perfectio boni est, non concopiscere: quid enim facilius homini sub lege constituto, quam velle bonum, et facere malum? Nam hoc est perficere bonum, nt ncc concupiscat homo. Imperfectum est bonum, quando concupiscit: etiamsi concupiscentiae non consentit ad malum. Non invenio, id est non possum. Non enim quod volo bonum hoc facio: sed quod nolo matum, hoc ago. Vincente consuetudine quod nolo facio: sicut si quis jurare consuevit, quando non putat incurrit. Si autem quod nolo, illud facio. Facere ergo se dixit, et operari, non affectu consentiendi et implendi: sed ipso motu concupiscendi. Non jam ego operor illud. Non ego, quia invitus;
for what is the perfection of good, but the extinction of evil? The perfection of good is not to covet: for what is easier for a man set under the law than to will the good and to do the evil? For this is to accomplish good — that a man should not even covet. Imperfect is the good, when he covets, even if he does not consent to the concupiscence unto evil. 'I find not' — that is, I cannot. For the good that I will, this I do not; but the evil which I will not, this I do. Habit prevailing, I do what I will not: just as if one has grown accustomed to swearing, he lapses into it when he does not think of it. But if I do that which I will not, that I do. He said therefore that he 'does' and 'works' it, not by the disposition of consenting and fulfilling, but by the very motion of coveting. It is no more I that work it. Not I, because I do it unwillingly;
因為善的完全,豈不就是惡的止息嗎?善的完全就是不起貪心:因為對那置身律法之下的人,還有甚麼比立志為善、卻去行惡更容易的呢?因為這才是成全善——就是人連貪心都不起。人一起貪心,善就是不完全的,即使他不首肯那導向惡的私慾。「我尋不著」——就是說,我不能。因為我所願意的善,我反不作;但我所不願意的惡,我倒去作。積習得勝,我就作我所不願作的:正如人若習慣了起誓,當他不留意時就脫口而出。若我所不願意的,我倒去作。所以他說他「去作」並「行」,不是憑首肯與成全的意向,乃是憑貪戀的那股衝動。就不再是我作那事了。不是我,因為我是不情願的;
1:173
sed ego, quia ipse mihi hanc per vim consuetudinis imposui necessitatem. Sed quod habitat in me peccatum. HaLitat in me consuetudo peccati, quae mihi ptr transgressionem primi parentis ex vitiata natura transfusa est. Invenio igitur legem volenti mihi facere bonum. Mente invenio legem bonum facere contra malum, quod est in carne mea. Legem consentaneam habeo interioris hominis ut excludatur malum, quod mihi per vitiatam naturam inest: sed sine gratia Dei fieri non potest. Ideo dico: Quis me liherabit de corpore mortis hujus? Quoniam mihi malum adjacet. Id est, desideria mala, vel consilia inimici, vel bella carnis, quibus inveterato consensu obtemperare consuevi.
but it is I, because I myself, by the force of habit, imposed this necessity upon myself. But it is sin that dwells in me. There dwells in me the habit of sin, which through the transgression of the first parent was poured into me from a vitiated nature. I find then a law, to me who would do good. In mind I find a law to do good against the evil which is in my flesh. I have a law agreeable to the inner man, so that the evil which is in me through vitiated nature may be shut out: but this cannot be done without the grace of God. Therefore I say: Who shall deliver me from the body of this death? Since evil is present with me. That is, evil desires, or the counsels of the enemy, or the wars of the flesh, which by inveterate consent I have grown accustomed to obey.
但也是我,因為是我自己藉積習之力,把這必然加在自己身上。惟有住在我裡面的罪。住在我裡面的乃是罪的積習,這積習藉始祖的違犯,從敗壞的本性傾注在我裡面。我覺得有個律,就是我願意為善的時候。我在心思裡覺得有一個為善的律,抵擋那在我肉體中的惡。我有一個與裡面的人相合的律,好將那藉敗壞本性在我裡面的惡排除出去:但這若無神的恩典就不能成就。所以我說:誰能救我脫離這取死的身體呢?因為有惡與我同在。就是說,就是那些惡念,或仇敵的計謀,或肉體的爭戰,這些是我因積久的首肯而習慣去順服的。
1:174
Adjacet autem malum ex concupiscentia, cui non consentit, qui dixit: Jam non ego operor illud. Condelector enim legi Dei. Hic duas leges ponit: legem spiritus, et legem carnis, quæ resistit legi mentis: id est, vel conscientiae naturali, vel legi divinae, quae in mente consistii. Libertas enim delectat: nam quandiu timore facis quod justum est, non Deus te delectat: quandiu non te delectat, adhuc servus facis. Delectet te, et liberes. Delectat me lex, delecta! quod lex jubet, delectat me ipsa justitia. Secundum interiorem hominem. Secundum mentem. Video autem aliam legem in membris meis. Hæc est, quae remansit infirmitas.
But evil is present out of concupiscence, to which he does not consent who said, 'It is no more I that work it.' For I delight in the law of God. Here he sets down two laws: the law of the spirit, and the law of the flesh, which resists the law of the mind: that is, either the natural conscience, or the divine law, which resides in the mind. For freedom brings delight: for as long as you do what is just out of fear, God does not delight you: as long as he does not delight you, you still act as a slave. Let him delight you, and set you free. The law delights me, that which the law commands delights me, righteousness itself delights me. According to the inner man. According to the mind. But I see another law in my members. This is the weakness that has remained.
但惡是出於私慾與人同在,那說「就不再是我作那事了」的人並不首肯這惡。因為我喜歡神的律。在此他立下兩個律:靈的律,與肉體的律,這肉體的律抵擋心思的律:就是說,或指本性的良心,或指存於心思中的神律。因為自由帶來喜樂:因為你若只是出於懼怕才行公義的事,神就不能使你喜樂:你既不以神為樂,就仍像奴僕般行事。願祂使你喜樂,並釋放你。律法使我喜樂,律法所吩咐的使我喜樂,公義本身使我喜樂。按著裡面的人。按著心思。但我覺得肢體中另有個律。這就是那殘存的軟弱。
1:175
Repugnantem legi mentis meæ, et captivantem me in lege peccati, quæ est in membris meis. Ex hac parte sentit captivitatem, ubi non est impleta justitia. Video autem aliam legem in membris meis: desideria carnis et motiones vitiatæ naturæ: id est, concupiscentiam. Sed ista concupiscenlia si vocatur peccatum, ideo, quia a peccato facta est, sic vocatur: sicut scriptura manus cujusque dicitur, quod manus eam fecerit: peccata autem sum quæ secundum carnis concupiscentiam illicite fiunt. Legem appellat in membris suis, onus ipsum mortalitatis, in quo ingemiscimus gravati. Corpus quod corrumpitur, aggravat animam: per quod fit etiam sæpe, ut invite delectet quod non licet:
warring against the law of my mind, and taking me captive in the law of sin, which is in my members. On this side he perceives captivity, where righteousness is not fulfilled. But I see another law in my members: the desires of the flesh and the motions of vitiated nature, that is, concupiscence. But this concupiscence, if it is called sin, is so called because it was made by sin, thus is it called: just as a man's handwriting is called 'a hand,' because the hand made it; but sins are those things which are done unlawfully according to the concupiscence of the flesh. He calls a 'law in his members' the very burden of mortality, in which, being weighed down, we groan. The body which is corrupted weighs down the soul: whereby it often happens that what is not permitted delights us even against our will:
這律和我心中的律交戰,把我擄去,叫我附從那肢體中犯罪的律。在這一面他覺察到被擄,就是公義未得成全之處。但我覺得肢體中另有個律:就是肉體的情慾與敗壞本性的衝動,就是貪心。但這貪心,若稱為罪,乃是因為它是罪所造成的,才這樣稱呼:正如人所寫的字稱為「手」,因為手寫成了它;但罪乃是那照肉體的私慾而不合法地行出來的事。他把那必死之重擔稱為「肢體中的律」,我們在這重擔之下被壓、歎息。這必朽壞的身體叫魂沉重:因此常有這樣的事,就是那不許可的事違背我們的心意反倒叫我們喜悅:
1:176
quam sarcinam ideo legem appellat, quia jure supplicii imposita est. Repugnantem legi mentis meæ. Quæ alibi mortificari jubet in membris. Mortificate, inquit, membra vestra. Legi, inquit, Dei: quæ in mente est et captivantem me. Captivum se esse deplorat: quia sentit in se desideria surgere puritati mentis contraria: contra quæ gratiam liberatoris implorat. Et hoc potest intelligi, quod captivitatem dixerit carne, non mente; occasione, non consensione; et ideo eaplivantem, quia et in ipsa carne non est aliena natura, sed nostra. Potest etiam videri Aposiolus eum describere qui sub lege adhuc vivit, nondum sub gratia. Quod dicit captivantem me, hoc est, carnem meam:
which burden he therefore calls a 'law,' because it was imposed by right of punishment. Warring against the law of my mind. Which elsewhere he commands to be mortified in the members: 'Mortify,' he says, 'your members.' The law, he says, of God: which is in the mind. And taking me captive. He laments that he is a captive: because he feels desires rising up in himself contrary to the purity of the mind; against which he implores the grace of the liberator. And this can also be understood, that he called the captivity of the flesh, not of the mind; by occasion, not by consent; and therefore 'taking me captive,' because even in the flesh itself there is not an alien nature, but our own. The Apostle may also seem to be describing one who still lives under the law, not yet under grace. What he says, 'taking me captive,' that is, my flesh:
所以他把這重擔稱為「律」,因為它是憑刑罰的權利加上的。這律和我心中的律交戰。就是他在別處吩咐要在肢體中治死的:他說「要治死你們的肢體」。他說神的律:這律在心思裡。把我擄去。他哀歎自己是被擄的:因為他覺得自己裡面興起與心思之潔淨相違的慾望;為此他懇求那位釋放者的恩典。這也可這樣理解,就是他所稱的被擄是指肉體的,不是心思的;是藉機會,不是藉首肯;因此說「把我擄去」,因為即使在肉體本身,那也不是外來的本性,乃是我們自己的本性。使徒也似乎是在描寫一個仍活在律法之下、尚未在恩典之下的人。他所說的「把我擄去」,就是指我的肉體:
1:177
legi peccati, quae est in membris meis. Sed etsi de ipso accipitur, non quod ipse immoderata libidine pollutus fuerit, sed a consensione prava liber: de concupiscentia tamen carnis, quam moderando frenabat, tanta humilitate et pietate gemuisse, ut optaret eam non habere potius quam domare. In lege peccati, quae est in membris meis. Quæ damnat peccatum, sive malam consuetudinem, quæ in membris est: quasi diceret, et captivantem me in lege sua. Ideo captivus, quia non facit quae vult. Quandiu caro concupiscit adversus spiritum, et spiritus adversus carnem. Infelix ego homo, quis me liberabit? Qui sic tentor.
to the law of sin, which is in my members. But even if it is taken as of himself, not that he himself was defiled with immoderate lust, but that, free from evil consent, he yet groaned over the concupiscence of the flesh — which by moderation he bridled — with such humility and piety that he wished rather not to have it than to master it. In the law of sin, which is in my members. Which condemns sin, or the evil habit, which is in the members: as if he said, 'and taking me captive in its own law.' Therefore a captive, because he does not do what he wills. As long as the flesh lusts against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh. Unhappy man that I am, who shall deliver me? — I who am thus tempted.
附從那肢體中犯罪的律。但即或這話取為指他自己,也不是說他自己被無度的情慾玷污了,乃是說他既脫離了惡的首肯,卻仍為肉體的私慾歎息——這私慾他藉節制加以約束——並且以如此的謙卑與虔敬歎息,以致他寧願根本沒有這私慾,也不願只是去制伏它。在肢體中犯罪的律裡。這律定罪,或說定那在肢體中的惡習:彷彿他說「並把我擄去,附從它自己的律」。所以是被擄的,因為他不能行他所願意的。因肉體貪戀聖靈,聖靈貪戀肉體,這是何等的爭戰。我真是苦啊,誰能救我呢?——我這樣被試探的人。
1:178
Verba sunt hominis sub gratia constituti, cujus actio habet quidem reluctantem mortalitatem carnis, sed non vincentem ad consensionem peccati. Quis neget Apostolum, cum haec diceret, adhuc fuisse in corpore mortis hujus ? a quo utique vel impii non liberantur, quibus eadem corpora ad tormenta aeterna redduntur. Liberari ergo est a corpore mortis bujus, omni sanato languore carnis concupiscentiæ non ad poenam corpus recipere, sed ad gloriam: sicut et alibi dicit: Et ipsi in nobismetipsis ingemiscimus adoptionem exspectantes, redemptionem corporis nostri. Liberari enim se a vitiis corporalibus et mortiferis deprecatur.Si nos, inquit,Filius liberaverit, vere liberi eritis. De corpore morit.
These are the words of a man established under grace, whose action indeed has the mortality of the flesh resisting it, yet not prevailing so as to consent to sin. Who would deny that the Apostle, when he said these things, was still in the body of this death? From it not even the impious are freed, they to whom their same bodies are restored for eternal torments. To be freed, therefore, from the body of this death is this: once every languor of the flesh's concupiscence has been healed, to receive the body not unto punishment but unto glory; as he also says elsewhere: 'And we ourselves groan within ourselves, awaiting the adoption, the redemption of our body.' For he prays that he may be freed from the vices of the body that bring death. 'If the Son,' he says, 'shall have set you free, you shall be free indeed.' Concerning the body of death.
這是一個立於恩典之下之人的話語;他的行動固然有肉體的必死性在抗拒,卻未能得勝以致順從罪。誰能否認使徒說這些話時,仍在這「死亡之身」中呢?連不敬虔的人也不得脫離此身,他們的同一身體要被交還去受永刑。因此,脫離這「死亡之身」,就是在肉體私慾的一切病弱都得醫治之後,領受這身體不是為受刑罰,而是為得榮耀;正如他在別處所說:「就是我們自己,也在心裡歎息,等候得著兒子的名分,就是我們的身體得贖。」因為他祈求脫離那些屬肉體、致人於死的敗壞。他說:「天父的兒子若叫你們自由,你們就真自由了。」論到死亡之身。
1:179
hujus ? Gratia Dei per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum. Corpus mortis est littera occidens. Corpus mortis est mortifera voluptas, et carnalis delectatio, et corpora lis infirmitas, et violentia consuetudinis, quae ad mortem trahit. De qua consuetudine non lex, sed gratia liberat, per Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum. Ante legem nulla pugna erat cum voluptatibus bujus saeculi, quia totum licebat: sub lege vero pugnatur, sed vincimur: sub gratia autem pugnamus, et Deo adjuvante vincimus, quia non timore, sed dilectione servimus.
of this? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. The body of death is the letter that kills. The body of death is deadly pleasure, and carnal delight, and bodily weakness, and the violence of habit, which drags one to death. From this habit not the law, but grace sets free, through our Lord Jesus Christ. Before the law there was no struggle against the pleasures of this world, because everything was permitted; but under the law there is a struggle, yet we are conquered; under grace, however, we struggle, and with God's help we conquer, because we serve not through fear but through love.
這個嗎?我們的主耶穌基督藉著祂賜下神的恩典。死亡的身體就是那使人死的字句。死亡的身體就是致死的情慾、肉體的歡愉、身體的軟弱,以及那把人拖向死亡的習慣之暴力。人得脫離這習慣,不是靠律法,而是靠恩典,藉著我們的主耶穌基督。在律法之前,人與今世的情慾並無爭戰,因為一切都是被允許的;但在律法之下便有爭戰,然而我們卻被勝過;至於在恩典之下,我們爭戰,並且靠神的幫助得勝,因為我們事奉不是出於懼怕,而是出於愛。
1:180
De quo corpore mortis non omnis liberatur, qui finit hanc vitam, sed qui in hac vita susceperit gratiam, et ne inaniter suscipiat, bonis operibus egerit et fuerit cooperatus. Aliud est enim exire de hoc corpore, aliud est liberari de corpore mortis hujus: quod sola Dei gratia impartit. Igitur ego ipse. Recapitulat aut concludit. Mente servio legi Dei. Quandiu carnalis sum, duplex sum. Carne autem. Carne servit legi peccati concupiscendo; mente legi Dei, eidem concupiscentiæ non consentiendo. Homo geminae et duplicis voluntatis: id est, aut carnalis, aut spiritualis, quodammodo in semetipso divisus juxta operum qualitatem. Lex quidem una est, sed duo sunt genera mandatorum:
From this body of death not everyone is set free who ends this life, but he who in this life has received grace, and, lest he receive it in vain, has acted and cooperated with good works. For it is one thing to depart from this body, another to be set free from the body of this death: which the grace of God alone bestows. 'Therefore I myself.' He recapitulates or concludes. 'With the mind I serve the law of God.' As long as I am carnal, I am twofold. 'But with the flesh.' With the flesh he serves the law of sin by coveting; with the mind, the law of God, by not consenting to that same concupiscence. A man of a twofold and double will: that is, either carnal or spiritual, in a certain way divided within himself according to the quality of his works. The law indeed is one, but there are two kinds of commandments:
並非每一個結束今生的人都得脫離這死亡的身體,唯有那在今生領受了恩典的人,並且為使他不徒然領受,便以善行行事並與恩典同工。因為離開這身體是一回事,脫離這死亡的身體又是另一回事:而後者唯獨神的恩典才能賜予。「所以我這人。」他在此作總結或結論。「我以心思順服神的律。」只要我還是屬肉體的,我就是雙重的。「然而以肉體。」以肉體因貪戀而順服罪的律;以心思則因不順從那同一貪慾而順服神的律。這是一個有雙重意志的人:即或屬肉體、或屬靈,照其行為的性質在自身裡以某種方式被分開。律法固然只有一個,誡命卻有兩類:
1:181
unum quod docet bonum, aliud quod prohibet malum. Quod docet bonum, Dei est; quod prohibet malum, nostrum vitium est, quibus lex opus sit dari, qui peccamus. Legi peccati. COa. suetudini, vel vitiatae naturæ, tandiu quandiu languor obluctatur saluti, et caro concupiscit adversus spiritum. CAP. VIII. Nihil ergo nunc damnationis est iis qui sunt in Christo Jesu. Non enim damnatur, nisi qui concupiscentiæ carnis consentit ad malum: nam carne mortua, nihil habet in se quod damnari possit. Qui non secundum carnem ambulant. Qui a Christo didicerunt carnem crucifigere, et non carnaliter vivunt. Lex enim spiritus vitæ in Christo Jesu liberavit me. Advertendum quia gratiam, legem appellat.
one that teaches good, another that forbids evil. What teaches good is of God; what forbids evil concerns our own vice, we for whom the law had to be given, we who sin. 'To the law of sin,' that is, to habit, or to corrupted nature, for as long as sickness struggles against health, and the flesh lusts against the spirit. CHAPTER VIII. 'There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus.' For no one is condemned except him who consents to the concupiscence of the flesh unto evil; for once the flesh is dead, he has in himself nothing that can be condemned. 'Who walk not according to the flesh': who have learned from Christ to crucify the flesh, and do not live carnally. 'For the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set me free.' Note that he calls grace 'law.'
一是教導善的,一是禁止惡的。教導善的是出於神;禁止惡的則關乎我們自身的敗壞,是為我們這犯罪的人才需頒賜律法。「順從罪的律」,即順從習慣,或順從被敗壞的本性,只要疾病仍與健康相爭,肉體仍與聖靈相敵而生貪慾。第八章。「如今那些在基督耶穌裡的,就不定罪了。」因為除了那順從肉體貪慾去行惡的人以外,無人被定罪;因為肉體既已死,他裡面就沒有可被定罪的東西了。「他們不隨從肉體」:就是那從基督學會將肉體釘十字架、並不照肉體而活的人。「因為賜生命之靈的律,在基督耶穌裡釋放了我。」要注意他把恩典稱為「律」。
1:182
Gratia Novi Teslamenti liberat nos a consuetudine peccati et mortis: auferendo etiam occasiones, et dando adjutorium et exemplum vivendi, ne scilicet consensionem meam concupiscentia sibi vindicet carnis. A lege peccati et mortis. Quae occidit, et morUMcat peccatores: id est, lege litterae, sive ab illa lege quam supra in membris dixerat dominari. Nam quod impossibile erat legi. Quia nibil ad perfectum lex adducit, impossibile erat legi ut homines carnales faceret fidei custodire justitiam: sed hoc Christus et praecepto, et exemplo, et adjutorio fecit esse possibile.
The grace of the New Testament frees us from the habit of sin and death, by also taking away the occasions, and by giving help and an example for living, namely, that the concupiscence of the flesh may not claim my consent for itself. 'From the law of sin and death,' which kills and puts sinners to death: that is, by the law of the letter, or from that law which above he had said reigns in the members. 'For what was impossible for the law.' Since the law brings nothing to perfection, it was impossible for the law to make carnal men keep the righteousness of faith; but Christ made this possible by precept, by example, and by help.
新約的恩典使我們脫離罪與死的習慣,也除去那些誘因,並賜下幫助與生活的榜樣,就是使肉體的貪慾不能奪去我的順從。「脫離罪與死的律」,這律殺害並置罪人於死地:即藉著那字句的律,或那他在上文說在肢體中掌權的律。「律法既因肉體軟弱有所不能行的。」既然律法不能使任何事達到完全,律法就不能使屬肉體的人持守信德的義;但基督藉著誡命、榜樣與幫助,使這成為可能。
1:183
Impossibile est enim legem implere per carnem, qua superbi, ignorantes Dei justitiam, id est quae ex Deo est homini ut sit justus, et suam volentes constituere, tanquam per eorum non adjutum divinitus arbitrium lex possit impleri, justitiae Dei non sunt subjecti: ideo justitia legis in eis impletur, qui non secundum carnem ambulant: id est, secundum hominem ignorantem Dei justitiam, sed ambulant secundum spiritum. In quo infirmabatur per carnem. Infirmabatur per concupiscentias, id est per desideria carnalia: ideo non implebatur lex, quia ipsius justitiae nondum erat charitas, quae interiore delectatione teneret mentem, ne ad peccatum delectatione rerum temporalium traheretur.
For it is impossible to fulfill the law through the flesh, by which the proud, being ignorant of God's righteousness—that is, the righteousness which is from God for man that he may be righteous—and wishing to establish their own, as though the law could be fulfilled by their free will not divinely assisted, are not subject to the righteousness of God: therefore the righteousness of the law is fulfilled in those who walk not according to the flesh—that is, according to a man ignorant of God's righteousness—but who walk according to the spirit. 'In which it was weakened through the flesh.' It was weakened through concupiscences, that is, through carnal desires: therefore the law was not fulfilled, because there was not yet the charity of that very righteousness, which by an inward delight would hold the mind fast, lest it be dragged toward sin by delight in temporal things.
因為靠著肉體不可能成全律法;那驕傲的人靠著肉體,不明白神的義(即那從神而來、使人成為義的義),卻想要立自己的義,彷彿律法可藉他們沒有神所助的自由意志得以成全,這樣的人就不服神的義:所以律法的義成全在那些不隨從肉體的人身上——就是不照那不明白神的義之人而行——乃是隨從聖靈而行的人。「律法在其中因肉體而軟弱了。」它因貪慾、就是因肉體的私慾而軟弱了:因此律法未得成全,因為尚未有那義本身的愛,這愛本能以內在的喜樂抓住人的心思,免得心思被今世事物的歡愉拖向罪。
1:184
Ergo infirmabatur lex per carnem: id est, non efficiebat justos deditos carni. Deus Filium suum mittens in similitudinem. Similem carnem suscepit cæteris hominibus sine peccato: quia nec de concupiscentia, nec de coitu, sed de virgine nata est. Facit hoc contra Photinum, qui negat Filium ante partum fuisse virginis. Carnis peccati. Non caro peccati erat, quae non carnali delectalione nata erat: tamen inerat similitudo carnis peccati, quia mortalis caro erat. Et de peccato damnavit peccatum. Et de carne, quae in nobis ante serviebat peccato, vicit peccatum non peccando: quomodo si quis de barbaris vincat barbaros.
Therefore the law was weakened through the flesh: that is, it did not make righteous those who were given over to the flesh. 'God sending His Son in the likeness.' He took on flesh like that of other men, but without sin: because He was born neither of concupiscence nor of intercourse, but of a virgin. He does this against Photinus, who denies that the Son existed before the virgin's childbearing. 'Of sinful flesh.' It was not flesh of sin, because it was not born of carnal delight: yet there was in it the likeness of sinful flesh, because it was mortal flesh. 'And by sin He condemned sin.' And from the flesh, which in us formerly served sin, He conquered sin by not sinning: as if someone from among the barbarians should conquer barbarians.
所以律法因肉體軟弱了:即它不能使那些交付給肉體的人成為義。「神差遣自己的兒子,成為相似的樣式。」祂取了與其他人相似的肉體,卻沒有罪:因為祂不是由貪慾、也不是由交合,而是由童貞女所生。他這樣說是駁斥福提努,他否認聖子在童貞女生產之前就已存在。「有罪之肉體的樣式。」那並非罪的肉體,因為它不是由肉體的歡愉而生:然而其中卻有有罪之肉體的樣式,因為它是必死的肉體。「並藉著罪定了罪案。」祂從那在我們裡面先前服事罪的肉體,藉著不犯罪而勝了罪:好比有人從蠻族之中勝過蠻族。
1:185
Hosliae quas offerebant pro peccato in lege, peccati nomine vocabantur, cum ipsae peccatum nescirent: Sic et peccati caro, quae pro peccatis nostris oblata est, peccati nomen accepit. Quidam dicunt de peccato Judaeorum, qui occiderunt Dominum, peccatum diaboli quo hominem implicuerit, condemnavit: sicut ad Haebraeos scriptum est, ut per mortem destrueret eum, qui habebat mortis imperium. Et recte mors peccatum dicitur, quam de peccato constat esse generatam. Quidam dicunt de peccato Judaeorum, qui eum crucifixerant, factum est, ut sanguinem suum in remissionem fUnderet peccatorum. In carne.
The sacrifices which under the law they offered for sin were called by the name of sin, though they themselves knew no sin: so also the flesh of sin, which was offered for our sins, received the name of sin. Some say that from the sin of the Jews, who killed the Lord, He condemned the sin of the devil by which he had entangled man: as it is written to the Hebrews, that through death He might destroy him who had the power of death. And rightly is death called sin, since it is agreed that it was begotten of sin. Some say that from the sin of the Jews, who had crucified Him, it came to pass that He shed His blood for the remission of sins. 'In the flesh.'
在律法之下他們為贖罪所獻的祭牲被稱為「罪」,儘管祭牲自身並不知罪:照樣,那為我們的罪獻上、有罪的肉體也得了「罪」之名。有人說,祂藉著那殺害主的猶太人的罪,定了魔鬼——就是那纏累人之罪——的罪案:正如希伯來書所寫,好叫祂藉著死敗壞那掌死權的。死被稱為罪也是合宜的,因為公認死是由罪所生。又有人說,藉著那把祂釘十字架的猶太人的罪,事情就成了,使祂流出自己的血,叫罪得赦。「在肉體中。」
1:186
In ipsa carne vicit peccatum, ut naturam, quæ fuerat bona per condiUonem, et per transgressionem est vitiata, per suam gratiam reformaret, ut ejus adjutorio vincere possit peccatum: quæ prius sic fuerat facta, ut pessit non peccare si velit. Sed ante transgressionem hoc, ut dixi: nam modo per gratiam Dei potet peccatum aut declinare, aut vincere: sic tamen, ut Utinum semper adjutorem imploret. Ut justificatio legis impleretur in nobis. Hic aut ipsam gratiam legem vocat, aut certe illam justificationem legis, quæ spiritu intra litteram latente est mani* festata:
In that very flesh He conquered sin, in order that He might reform by His grace the nature which had been good by its creation and was corrupted by transgression, so that by His help it might be able to conquer sin: which nature had first been so made that it could refrain from sinning if it willed. But this was before the transgression, as I said: for now, through the grace of God, it is able either to avoid sin or to conquer it; yet in such a way that it always implores the Latin—rather, God—as its helper. 'That the justification of the law might be fulfilled in us.' Here he calls either grace itself 'law,' or certainly that justification of the law which was made manifest by the spirit hidden within the letter:
祂正是在那肉體中勝了罪,為要藉著自己的恩典重整那本性——那本性因受造原是善的,卻因過犯被敗壞了——好叫這本性藉著祂的幫助能勝過罪:這本性起初受造時本是這樣,若它願意,便能不犯罪。但如我所說,那是在過犯之前:因為如今藉著神的恩典,它或能躲避罪、或能勝過罪;然而總要如此,就是要它時常懇求神作幫助者。「使律法的義成全在我們身上。」他在此或把恩典本身稱為「律」,或必定是指那律法的義,就是那藉著隱藏在字句之內的靈所顯明的義:
1:187
ut quoniam in illis viva et repugnante carne, justificatio legis impleri non potuit, in nobis impleatur, qui Christi adjutorio earnem mortificamus cum vitiis. Præcepta legis implentur per charitatem, quæ per timorem non poterant impleri. Qui non secundum carnem ambulamus. Conversamur. Sed tecundnm spiritum. Caro de terra facta est, spiritus autem a Deo datus est. Utraque ergo illa desiderant unde sunt: caro terrena, spiritus cœlestia. Si igitur spiritus carnem superaverit, operantur caelestia; si autem consenserit, t rrena prævalebunt. Quis au em ambulat secundum spiritum, nisi qui agitur Dei Spiritu ? Quotquot enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, ii filii Hei sunt. Qui enim.
so that, since among those in whom the flesh was alive and resisting the justification of the law could not be fulfilled, it might be fulfilled in us who, by Christ's help, mortify the flesh with its vices. The precepts of the law are fulfilled through charity, which could not be fulfilled through fear. 'Who walk not according to the flesh': who conduct ourselves. 'But according to the spirit.' The flesh is made of earth, but the spirit is given by God. Each of these therefore desires the things whence it comes: the flesh, earthly things; the spirit, heavenly things. If therefore the spirit overcomes the flesh, heavenly things are wrought; but if it consents, earthly things will prevail. But who walks according to the spirit, except him who is led by the Spirit of God? 'For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God.' 'For those who.'
為要如此:既然在那些肉體仍活著、抗拒律法之義的人身上,這義不能得成全,它便可成全在我們身上,就是那藉基督的幫助、將肉體連同其惡習治死的人。律法的誡命藉著愛得以成全,這是靠懼怕所不能成全的。「我們不隨從肉體」:即我們的行事為人。「乃隨從聖靈。」肉體是由塵土造的,靈卻是神所賜的。因此二者各自渴慕自己所出之處:肉體渴慕屬地的事,靈渴慕屬天的事。所以,若靈勝過肉體,屬天的事便得成就;但若它順從肉體,屬地的事就必得勝。然而,除了那被神的靈引導的人以外,誰能隨從聖靈而行呢?「因為凡被神的靈引導的,都是神的兒子。」「因為那些。」
1:188
Unus homo ex spiritu constat et carne: quando ergo seCundum carnem ambulat, caro est; quando secundum spiritum, spiritus est. Secundum carnem sunt. Manifesta sunt opera carnis. Quæ carnis sunt sapiunt. Terrena et carnalia bona pro summis bonis concupiscunt. Qui vero secundum spirtium, quæ sunt spiritus sentiunt. Id est divina. Deus cnim spiritus est: quisquis non resistit vnlunuti Dei, quae sunt spiritus sentit. Nam prudentia carnis mors est. Prudentia a providendo dicitur. Ipse alibi dicit, prudentiam humanam esse, malo vicem referre. Talis ergo prudentia mortem parat transgrediendo præceptum. Ergo prudentia carnis est, ut unusquisque velit se vindicare.
One man consists of spirit and flesh: when therefore he walks according to the flesh, he is flesh; when according to the spirit, he is spirit. 'They are according to the flesh.' The works of the flesh are manifest. 'They mind the things of the flesh.' They covet earthly and carnal goods as the highest goods. 'But those who are according to the spirit mind the things of the spirit,' that is, divine things. For God is spirit: whoever does not resist the will of God minds the things of the spirit. 'For the prudence of the flesh is death.' Prudence is named from foreseeing. Elsewhere he himself says that it is human prudence to return injury for injury. Such prudence therefore prepares death by transgressing the precept. Therefore it is the prudence of the flesh that each one should wish to avenge himself.
一個人是由靈與肉體構成的:所以當他隨從肉體而行時,他就是肉體;當他隨從聖靈而行時,他就是靈。「他們是隨從肉體的。」肉體的行為是顯而易見的。「他們體貼肉體的事。」他們把屬地屬肉體之物當作至善去貪求。「但那些隨從聖靈的,就體貼聖靈的事」,即屬神的事。因為神是靈:凡不抗拒神旨意的,就體貼靈的事。「因為體貼肉體就是死。」「明智」(prudentia)一詞出於「預見」。他在別處自己說,以牙還牙乃是人的明智。因此這樣的明智藉著違背誡命而預備死亡。所以人人都想為自己報復,這就是肉體的明智。
1:189
Prudentia vero spiritus, non reddere malum pro malo: Anima cum inferiora appetit, prudenliam carnis habere dicitur; cum superiora, prudentiam spiritus. Non quia prudentia carnis substantia est, qua anima induitur aut exuitur; sed ipsius animæ affectio est, quæ omnino esse desinet, cum se totam ad superiora converterit. Prudentia autem spiritus, vita et pax. Prudentia spiritus et in praesenti pacem habet, non reddendo malum pro malo; et in æternum vitam æternam meretur, propter obedientiam et pacem, dum per suam patientiam non sinit crescere peccatum. Quoniam sa. plentia carnis. Non caro, sed carnalis actus. Inimicitia est in Deum. Omne enim quod non est subjectum Deo inimicum est:
But the prudence of the spirit is not to render evil for evil: when the soul desires lower things, it is said to have the prudence of the flesh; when higher things, the prudence of the spirit. Not because the prudence of the flesh is a substance with which the soul is clothed or unclothed; but it is an affection of the soul itself, which will altogether cease to exist when it has turned itself wholly to higher things. 'But the prudence of the spirit is life and peace.' The prudence of the spirit both has peace in the present, by not rendering evil for evil, and for eternity merits eternal life, on account of obedience and peace, while by its patience it does not allow sin to increase. 'Because the wisdom of the flesh.' Not the flesh, but the carnal act. 'Is enmity against God.' For everything that is not subject to God is an enemy:
但靈的明智乃是不以惡報惡:當靈魂渴慕較低下的事時,就說它有肉體的明智;當它渴慕較高的事時,就有靈的明智。這並非因為肉體的明智是一種靈魂所穿上或脫下的實體;乃是靈魂自身的一種情感,這情感在它完全轉向較高之事時就必徹底止息。「但靈的明智乃是生命與平安。」靈的明智在今生藉著不以惡報惡而有平安,又因順服與平安、並藉自己的忍耐不容罪增長,而在永世得著永生。「因為肉體的智慧。」不是肉體,而是肉體的行為。「乃是與神為敵。」因為凡不服神的,就都是仇敵:
1:190
et quicunque se vult vindicare; excedit modum etiam veLeris legis: non quia Deo quid nocere potesi, sed sibi nocet. Legi enim Dei non subjicitur, nec enim potest. Impossibile pentus dixit, ut vel sic illos a carnis illecebris et luxuria revocaret: velut si dicamus, injustitia esse non potest justa: tanquam si dicecretur: Nix non calefacit, nec enim potest: quandiu enim nix est, non calefacit; sed resolvi potest, potest et fervere ut calefaciat, sed cum hoc facit, jam nix non est. Sic et prudentia carnis dicitur, cum mundaua pro coelestibus concupiscit: sed cum coelestia desi lerare incœperit, desinit esse carualis prudentia. Qui autem in carne sunt.
and whoever wishes to avenge himself exceeds even the measure of the old law: not because he can do any harm to God, but he harms himself. 'For it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can it be.' He said 'impossible' precisely so that in this way he might call them back from the enticements and luxury of the flesh: as if we should say, injustice cannot be just; as though it were said: Snow does not warm, nor indeed can it: for as long as it is snow, it does not warm; but it can be melted, it can even boil so as to warm, but when it does this, it is no longer snow. So too it is called the prudence of the flesh when it covets worldly things instead of heavenly ones: but when it begins to desire heavenly things, it ceases to be the prudence of the flesh. 'But those who are in the flesh.'
凡想要為自己報復的人,甚至超過了舊律法的限度:這並非因為他能傷害神甚麼,乃是傷害自己。「因為它不服神的律法,也是不能服的。」他說「不能」,正是為要藉此把他們從肉體的誘惑與奢逸中喚回:好比我們說,不義不能成為公義;又如同說:雪不使人溫暖,也不能使人溫暖:因為只要它是雪,就不使人溫暖;但它可被融化,甚至可沸騰以致使人溫暖,然而當它這樣時,就不再是雪了。照樣,當它貪求屬世之物而非屬天之物時,就稱為肉體的明智:但當它開始渴慕屬天之物時,就不再是肉體的明智了。「但那些屬肉體的人。」
1:191
Hinc probatur, quia non de substantia dixerit carnis. Deo placere non possunt. Quia fieri non potest ut non peccent qui carnaliter vivunt, et carnis voluntatibus acquiescunt. Vos autem in carne non eMis. Hoc est, in carnalibus desideriis, sed in spiritualibus. Sed in spiritu. In spiritali actu illi spiritualiter vivunt qui Spiritum Dei habent: in illos Spiritus Dei est, in quos apparuerit fructus ejus, sicut ad Galatas ait, fructus Spiritus. Si tamen Spiritus Dei habitat iii vobis. Si quis autem Spiritum Christi non habet, hic non est ejus. Qui inimicos diligit, intelliget sanctum Spiritum sicut ex Patris, ita etiam ex Filii substantia procedere:
From this it is proved that he did not speak of the substance of the flesh. 'Cannot please God.' Because it cannot come to pass that those who live carnally and acquiesce in the desires of the flesh should not sin. 'But you are not in the flesh,' that is, in carnal desires, but in spiritual ones. 'But in the spirit.' In spiritual action they live spiritually who have the Spirit of God: in those the Spirit of God dwells in whom His fruit has appeared, as he says to the Galatians, 'the fruit of the Spirit.' 'If indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not His.' He who loves his enemies will understand that the Holy Spirit proceeds both from the substance of the Father and also from that of the Son:
由此便證明,他所說的並非肉體的實體。「不能得神的喜悅。」因為那些屬肉體而活、又順服肉體私慾的人,斷不可能不犯罪。「但你們不屬肉體」,即不在肉體的私慾中,乃在屬靈的事上。「乃屬聖靈。」凡有神的靈的人,就在屬靈的行事上屬靈地活著:神的靈住在那些顯出祂果子的人裡面,正如他對加拉太人所說,「聖靈的果子」。「如果神的靈住在你們心裡。人若沒有基督的靈,就不是屬基督的。」那愛仇敵的人便會明白,聖靈是從父的本質、也從子的本質而出:
1:192
quia unius esi atque ejusdem substantiæ, qui ejus Spiritum habet. Et ideo sicut Patris, ita et Filii appellatur. Et ideo dixit in Evangelio, de meO accipiet. Si quis, inquit, Spiritum Dci non habet: hoc est, ut orei pro persequentibus, ut diligat inimicos, ut in omnibus cum imitetur, sicut dicit Petrus apostolus: Christus passus pro vobis, reliquit vobis exemplum, etc. Dicit enim ipse discipulis: Nescitis cujus spiritus sitis, hi spiritus ejus erant, quia in hie, et spe, et charitate, vivebant. Si autem Christus. Si Christum semper imitamiui. Corpus quasi mortuum, etsi resistit, non vincit, sicut David dicit: Ego autem sicut surdus non audiebam: et tu exaudies me, Domine Deus meus.
because he who has His Spirit is of one and the same substance. And therefore, just as He is called the Spirit of the Father, so also of the Son. And therefore He said in the Gospel, 'He will receive of Mine.' 'If anyone,' he says, 'does not have the Spirit of God': that is, so as to pray for his persecutors, to love his enemies, to imitate Him in all things, as the apostle Peter says: 'Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example,' etc. For He Himself says to the disciples: 'You do not know of what spirit you are'—these were of His spirit, because they lived in faith, and hope, and charity. 'But if Christ.' If we always imitate Christ. The body, as though dead, even if it resists, does not conquer, as David says: 'But I, as a deaf man, did not hear; and Thou wilt hear me, O Lord my God.'
因為凡有祂之靈的,就與祂同一本質。因此,正如祂被稱為父的靈,也照樣被稱為子的靈。所以祂在福音中說:「祂要領受我的。」他說:「人若沒有神的靈」:就是說,要為逼迫他的人禱告,要愛仇敵,凡事效法祂,正如使徒彼得所說:「基督為你們受過苦,給你們留下榜樣」等等。因為祂親自對門徒說:「你們不知道自己是屬何等的靈」——這些人是屬祂之靈的,因為他們活在信、望、與愛之中。「但若基督。」若我們常常效法基督。身體雖如死了一般,即或抗拒,也不能得勝,正如大衛所說:「但我如聾子不聽;耶和華我的神啊,你必應允我。」
1:193
In vobis est. Per gratiam suam. Corpus quidem. Spiritus vivit et vivificat, ut justitiam faciamus: ca: o autem mortua est, n6 ab ea vincantur. Non hoc solum quaritur, ut caro moriatur, sed etiam ut spiritus vivificetur. Simul adverte quod vita anianae justitia sil: oportet ergo ut non solum a carnalibus cessemus, sed etiam spiritualia faciamus. Mortuum est propter peccatum. Mortuum corpus dicit quandiu tale esi, ut indigentia rerum corporalium molestet animam, et quibusdam motibus sollicitet et inquietet. Nam peccatum ideo concupiscentia nuncupatur, quia merito peccati contigit: sicut scriptura manus cujusque dicimur, quod manus eam fecerit. Spiritus vcro vivit propter justificationem.
'Is in you,' by His grace. 'The body indeed.' The spirit lives and gives life, that we may do righteousness; but the flesh is dead, so that they may not be overcome by it. Not only is this sought, that the flesh should die, but also that the spirit should be quickened. At the same time note that the life of the soul is righteousness: it is fitting therefore that we not only cease from carnal things, but also do spiritual things. 'Is dead because of sin.' He calls the body dead as long as it is such that the neediness of bodily things troubles the soul, and by certain motions solicits and disturbs it. For sin is therefore called concupiscence, because it came about by the desert of sin: just as we speak of anyone's 'hand' in Scripture, because the hand made it. 'But the spirit lives because of justification.'
「在你們裡面」,藉著祂的恩典。「身體固然。」靈活著並賜生命,好叫我們行義;但肉體卻是死的,免得他們被它勝過。人所追求的不僅是叫肉體死,也是叫靈得以活過來。同時要注意,靈魂的生命就是義:所以我們理當不僅止息屬肉體的事,也當行屬靈的事。「因罪而死。」只要身體仍是這樣,就是身體對物質的需求攪擾靈魂、並以某些衝動纏擾攪亂靈魂,他就稱身體為死的。罪之所以被稱為貪慾,是因它是因罪之報應而來:正如聖經中我們說某人的「手」所作的,因為是手作成了它。「但靈卻因義而活。」
1:194
Ille homo hic describitur, qui sub gratia vivit, et nondum habet perfectam picem. quæ corporis resurrectione et immutatione futura esi. Nam quandiuin hac vita sumus, non deest aut titillatio, aut delectatio: quamvis enim non cedat qui sub gratia vivit, et mente servit legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati. Quod si Spiritus ejus, qui suscitavit Jesum II mortuis, habitet in vobis, qui suscitavit Jesum Christum a mortuis. Si vos ita exhibeatis ut digni sitis in quibus Spiritus sanctus habitet, non patietur templuni sui Spiritus interiro Deus: sed quomodo suscitavit Jesum a mortuis, ita et nos vivificavit. Virificabit mortalia corpora vestra, propter inhabitantem Spiritum ejus in vobis.
Here is described that man who lives under grace, and does not yet have perfect peace, which is to come by the resurrection and transformation of the body. For as long as we are in this life, there is no lack of either titillation or delight: for although he who lives under grace and with his mind serves the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin, does not yield. 'But if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you'—of Him who raised Jesus Christ from the dead. If you so present yourselves as to be worthy for the Holy Spirit to dwell in, God will not allow the temple of His Spirit to perish: but just as He raised Jesus from the dead, so He has also quickened us. 'He will quicken your mortal bodies, because of His Spirit dwelling in you.'
這裡所描述的是那在恩典之下生活、卻尚未有完全平安的人,這平安要藉著身體的復活與改變將來才有。因為只要我們還在今生,就不免有撩撥或歡愉:因為那在恩典之下生活、以心思順服神的律、卻以肉體順服罪之律的人,雖不屈服。「但若那叫耶穌從死裡復活者的靈住在你們心裡」——就是那叫耶穌基督從死裡復活者的靈。你們若這樣把自己獻上,配得聖靈住在其中,神就不容祂的靈之殿毀滅:乃是正如祂叫耶穌從死裡復活,照樣也叫我們活過來。「祂必因住在你們裡面之靈,使你們必死的身體活過來。」
1:195
Vivificatis igi ur mortalibus corporibus vestris, non solum ad peccandum consensio nulla erit, sed nec ipsa cui consentiatur, carnis concupiscentia. Ergo, fratres, debitores sumus. Hoc totum facit, ut ostendat legem veterem fidclibus non necessariam, quæ carnalibus et peccatoribus data est. Non carni, ut secundum carnem vivamus. Id est, jam non sumus subjecti carnali consuetudini. Si enim secundum carnem vixeritis, moriemini. Si secundum rationem supra expositam, quod carnales homines justitiam custodire non possunt. Si autem Spiritu facta carnis mortificaveritis, vivetis. Expostrit quid SUpra dixerit carnem, hoc est, spiritualibns actibus carnalia opera sobjeccritis.
When your mortal bodies are therefore quickened, not only will there be no consent to sinning, but not even the very concupiscence of the flesh to which one might consent. 'Therefore, brethren, we are debtors.' All this he does to show that the old law is not necessary for the faithful, since it was given for the carnal and for sinners. 'Not to the flesh, that we should live according to the flesh': that is, we are no longer subject to carnal habit. 'For if you live according to the flesh, you shall die.' If according to the reason set forth above, namely that carnal men cannot keep righteousness. 'But if by the Spirit you mortify the deeds of the flesh, you shall live.' He explains what he meant above by 'flesh,' namely, if by spiritual acts you subject the works of the flesh.
所以,當你們必死的身體活過來時,不僅不會有順從犯罪的心,甚至連那可被順從的、肉體的貪慾也沒有了。「弟兄們,這樣看來,我們乃是欠債的。」他這一切都是要顯明,舊律法對信徒並非必需,因為它原是為屬肉體的人和罪人而頒賜的。「並不是欠肉體的債去順從肉體而活」:即我們不再受肉體習慣的轄制。「因為你們若順從肉體而活,必要死。」若照上文所述的道理,就是屬肉體的人不能持守義。「但你們若靠著聖靈治死身體的惡行,必要活著。」他在此解明上文所說「肉體」的意思,就是說,你們若以屬靈的行為制伏肉體的作為。
1:196
Quicunque enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, ii sunt filii Dei. Quicunque gratia Dei et Spiritu sancto gubernantur. Tunc bene agis, si ab eo agaris: econtra filii diaboli spiritu ejus aguntur, qui ab initio peccat. Non enim accepistis spiritum servitutis iterum in timore. Judæi acceperunt spiritum in timore, qui iios ad servitutem eogeret: quia qui timet, servus est; qui autem dlligit, filius: sicut seriptum est: Servus timet dominum, et filius diligit patrem suum. Si pater sum, ubi est honor meus? Si dominus, ubi est timor meus? Uti ergo,,,tia opCrari propter amorem nolebant, timore et necessitate coguntur; nos vero omnia voluntarie. propter dilectionem facere debemus, quasi filii.
'For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God.' As many as are governed by the grace of God and the Holy Spirit. You do well then, if you are moved by Him; on the contrary, the sons of the devil are moved by his spirit, who sins from the beginning. 'For you have not received the spirit of bondage again in fear.' The Jews received a spirit in fear, which compelled them to bondage: because he who fears is a slave; but he who loves is a son: as it is written: 'A slave fears his master, and a son loves his father. If I am a father, where is my honor? If a master, where is my fear?' Therefore, as those who were unwilling to work righteousness out of love are compelled by fear and necessity, we on the contrary ought to do all things voluntarily, out of love, as sons.
「因為凡被神的靈引導的,都是神的兒子。」凡被神的恩典與聖靈所治理的。你若被祂感動,就行得好;反之,魔鬼的兒女乃被那從起初就犯罪者的靈所感動。「你們所受的,不是奴僕的心,仍舊害怕。」猶太人所受的是懼怕的心,這心逼他們作奴僕:因為懼怕的就是奴僕;愛的卻是兒子:正如經上所記:「奴僕懼怕主人,兒子敬愛父親。我若作父親,我的尊榮在哪裡呢?我若作主人,人對我的敬畏在哪裡呢?」所以,正如那些不肯出於愛去行義的人,被懼怕與必要所逼;我們反倒當像兒子一樣,出於愛心甘情願地行一切事。
1:197
Sed accepistis spiritum adoptionis filiorum Dei. Tunc ndoptamur, quando per baptismum renascimur: nam ante filii iræ; et si fiii ine, ubi e t fides naturæ? In quo clamamus, Abba Pater. Qui vocat patrem, ostendii se esse filium. In omnibus ergo debet imitari patrem, ne pro nom ne indigne usurpato, majori subjaceat pœnæ. Clamantem, id est clamare no! facientem. Ipse Spir ius testimonium reddit spiritui nostro, quod sumus fili. Testimonium est adoptionis, quod habemus spiritum, per quem sic oramus. Tantum donum accipere nemo poterat, nisi Filii gratia, quæ est arrha, hoc est do um Spiritus sancti. Si autem filii et hæredes quidem Dei, cohæredes autem Christi.
'But you have received the spirit of the adoption of the sons of God.' We are then adopted when we are reborn through baptism: for before we were children of wrath; and if children of wrath, where is the fidelity of nature? 'In which we cry, Abba, Father.' He who calls upon a father shows himself to be a son. In all things therefore he ought to imitate the father, lest for a name unworthily usurped he be subject to a greater punishment. 'Crying,' that is, making us cry. 'The Spirit Himself bears witness to our spirit that we are sons.' It is a testimony of adoption that we have the Spirit, through whom we thus pray. So great a gift no one could receive except through the grace of the Son, which is the pledge, that is, the gift of the Holy Spirit. 'But if sons, then heirs indeed of God, but joint-heirs of Christ.'
「你們所受的,乃是神兒子名分的靈。」我們得兒子名分,是在藉著洗禮重生之時:因為從前我們是可怒之子;既是可怒之子,那本性的信實又在哪裡呢?「我們藉著這靈呼叫:阿爸,父。」凡呼叫父的,就顯明自己是兒子。所以他理當凡事效法父,免得因不配僭取這名分而受更大的刑罰。「呼叫」,就是使我們呼叫。「聖靈親自與我們的靈同證我們是神的兒女。」我們有這靈、並藉這靈如此禱告,這就是得兒子名分的憑證。如此大的恩賜,除了藉著子的恩典,無人能領受,這恩典就是質、即聖靈的恩賜。「既是兒女,便是後嗣,就是神的後嗣,和基督同作後嗣。」
1:198
Qui per gratiam efficitur filius, merebitur esse hæres, et cohæres vcro Filio fieri. Si tamen compatimur, ut et glorificemur. Si compatimur,patientia est, et etiam perseverantia: quia si dona Dei ante oculos nostros ponimus, quæ ille pro nobis impiis pertulit, tali adjulore, non debemus timere pati pro illo, ut conglorificemur, sicut dicit sanctus Joannes: Nunc filii Dei sumus; cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus. Existimo enim quod non sunt condignæ passiones hujus temporis, ad futuram gloriam, quæ revelabitur in nobis. Quid potest homo dignum pati gloria coelesti, etiamsi esset illa vita, qualis nunc est ista? quidquid passui fuerit a morte, plus non est quam etiam pro peccati.
He who by grace is made a son will merit to be an heir, and to become truly a joint-heir with the Son. 'If indeed we suffer with Him, that we may also be glorified together.' If we suffer with Him, this is patience, and also perseverance: because if we set before our eyes the gifts of God, which He endured for us who were impious, with such a helper we ought not to fear to suffer for Him, that we may be glorified together, as Saint John says: 'Now we are the sons of God; when He shall appear, we shall be like Him.' 'For I reckon that the sufferings of this time are not worthy to be compared with the future glory that shall be revealed in us.' What can a man suffer worthy of heavenly glory, even if that life were such as this present one now is? Whatever he suffers from death is no more than what even for his sins
那藉著恩典得成為兒子的,必配得作後嗣,並真正與子同作後嗣。「如果我們和祂一同受苦,也必和祂一同得榮耀。」我們若與祂一同受苦,這就是忍耐,也是恆忍:因為我們若把神的恩賜擺在眼前,就是祂為我們這些不虔的人所忍受的,有這樣一位幫助者,我們就不當懼怕為祂受苦,好叫我們與祂一同得榮耀,正如聖約翰所說:「如今我們是神的兒女;將來祂顯現時,我們必要像祂。」「我想,現在的苦楚若比起將來要顯於我們的榮耀,就不足介意了。」人所能受的,有甚麼配得上屬天的榮耀呢,就算今生如同現今這光景?他因死所受的一切,也不過是他從前為自己的罪
1:199
suis antea merebatur. Nunc autem et peccati donantur, et tunc vita aeterna dabitur, et spleud. r solis, etc. Ostendit praemium, quo facilius etiam mors contemnatur, quo ad illum possit tutius perveniti. Nam scimus homines, quod pejus est, propter aurum se ultro ad bestias subrepsisae. Quod nos Deo adjutore facere debemus in tribulationibus propter Dominum: quae cum sint temporales, aeternam salutem tribuunt. Si hoc ille dicit, quid nos ? Nam exspectatio creature revelationem filiorum Dei exspectat. Vanitati enim subjecta est creatura. Quidam de Adam et Eva volunt sentire creatura, quos serpens spe divi nitatis subjecerit vanitati, et corruptioni fecerit de. servire non volentes:
was previously deserving. But now sins are both forgiven, and then eternal life will be given, and the splendor of the sun, etc. He shows the reward, so that death may more easily be despised, so that one may more safely come to Him. For we know men—what is worse—of their own accord to have crept up to the beasts for the sake of gold. This we ought to do, with God as helper, in tribulations for the Lord's sake: which, though they be temporal, bestow eternal salvation. If he says this, what of us? 'For the expectation of the creature awaits the revelation of the sons of God.' 'For the creature was made subject to vanity.' Some wish to understand the creature as Adam and Eve, whom the serpent, by the hope of divinity, subjected to vanity, and made to be subject to corruption though unwilling:
所應得的。但如今罪既得赦免,將來又要賜下永生,和日頭的光輝等等。他把賞賜顯明出來,好叫死更容易被輕看,使人更穩妥地得以到祂那裡。因為我們知道,有人——更糟的是——為著黃金竟甘願爬向野獸。我們在患難中為主的緣故,靠著神為幫助者,更當如此行:這些患難雖是暫時的,卻賜下永遠的救恩。他若這樣說,我們又當如何呢?「受造之物切望等候神的眾子顯出來。」「因為受造之物服在虛空之下。」有人想把「受造之物」理解為亞當和夏娃,蛇用作神的盼望使他們服在虛空之下,並使他們雖不情願卻淪於敗壞:
1:200
hoc est, non ex semetipsis quia peccantes justo judicio sunt addicti; quia ei ipsi (inquiunt) liberabuntur a servitute corruptionis. Omnem autem creaturam, dicunt, omnes homines, quia usque ad adventum Christi fuerunt justi, quia et ipsi nondum acceperunt, sed exspectant ii spe. Nou solum autem illi; sed et nos ipsi, in quibus complei sunt, adhuc speramus, quibus dictum est: Multi prophetæ et justi cupierunt videre qaae videtis, et non viderunt. Ideo dicit: Revelationem filiorum Det exspectant; tandiu omnia sic erunt quandio erit resurrectio, postea ab actu cessabunt, et mutabuntor. secundum Scripturas. Vanitati enim subjecta: id est hominibus, qui evanuerunt, quibus alii homines ministrant.
that is, not of themselves, because sinning they were condemned by a just judgment; because they themselves (they say) will be freed from the bondage of corruption. But by 'every creature' they say all men are meant, because up to the coming of Christ they were righteous, since they too have not yet received, but await in hope. 'And not only they, but we ourselves also,' in whom these things are fulfilled, still hope, we to whom it was said: 'Many prophets and righteous men desired to see the things which you see, and did not see them.' Therefore he says: 'They await the revelation of the sons of God'; all things will be thus for as long as there is resurrection; afterwards they will cease from activity, and be changed, according to the Scriptures. 'For it was made subject to vanity,' that is, to men who have vanished, whom other men serve.
即不是出於自己,因為他們犯罪,就按公義的審判被定罪;因為他們自己(照這些人的說法)也必得脫離敗壞的轄制。而他們說「一切受造之物」是指眾人,因為直到基督降臨,他們都是義人,既然他們也尚未領受,乃是在盼望中等候。「不但如此,就是我們自己」,這些事在我們身上得應驗,我們仍在盼望中,就是那對我們所說的:「有許多先知和義人要看你們所看的,卻沒有看見。」所以他說:「他們等候神的眾子顯出來」;只要仍有復活,一切就必如此;此後這一切就止息其運作,並照聖經而被改變。「因為受造之物服在虛空之下」,即服在那已歸虛空的人之下,有別的人服事他們。
1:201
Quidquid finem babet, vanum est ad comparationem æternæ vitæ. Yanitas (inquit) vanitatum, omnia vanitas. Nec putes ipsam tibi aliquid præstitisse, cum etiam peritura et mundana donaverit. Non v,lens, sed propter eum qui subjecti eam in spe. Non sua sponte. Alii dicunt angelos, quia et ipsi creatura sunt, exspectare ut homines in angelorum dignitatem mutentur. Quia et ipsa creatura liberabitur a servitute corruptionis, in libertatem gloriae filiorunt Dei. Qui d6 mundi creatura hoc tolunl accipere, hoc dicunt: Quando glorificandi sunt ff ii Dei, tunc et ipsa creatura libera fiet a servitute: quia et ipsa laborem sentit, sicut et terra jugiter seminata sterilis efficitur.
Whatever has an end is vain in comparison with eternal life. 'Vanity (he says) of vanities, all is vanity.' Do not think that it has bestowed anything upon you, since it has given even perishable and worldly things. 'Not willing, but by reason of Him who subjected it, in hope.' Not of its own accord. Others say the angels, because they too are creatures, await that men be changed into the dignity of angels. 'Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption, into the liberty of the glory of the sons of God.' Those who wish to understand this of the creation of the world say this: When the sons of God are to be glorified, then the creation itself also will become free from bondage: because it too feels toil, just as land continually sown becomes barren.
凡有終結的,與永生相比都是虛空。「他說:虛空的虛空,凡事都是虛空。」不要以為它曾賜給你甚麼,因為它所給的不過是必朽壞、屬世之物。「不是自願的,乃是因那叫它服在盼望之下者的緣故。」不是出於自己的意願。另有人說,是天使——因為天使也是受造之物——在等候人被改變成天使的尊榮。「因為受造之物自己也必脫離敗壞的轄制,得享神兒女自由的榮耀。」那些願把這話理解為世界受造之物的人如此說:當神的眾子將要得榮耀時,那時受造之物自己也必脫離轄制得自由:因為它也感到勞苦,正如地被不斷耕種便成為貧瘠。
1:202
Scimus enim quod omnis crcutura ingemiscit, ei parturit usque adhuc. Illa quæ posSunt ingemiscere, propter nimium laborem ingemiscunt: quia plus alt illis exigitur quam possunt. Quæ autem sensum no. habent, quomodo gemunt ? rtisi forte propter nottras iniquitates ingemiscant, sicut in passione Domini sol fugit, quia impietatem Judæorum videre non poterat. Non solum autem illa, sed et nos ipsi, primitias spiritus habentes, et ipsi intra nos gemimus, adoptionem exspectantes. Non solam creatura, quæ receptaculum spiritus non habet, vel carnales homines; sed et nos qui noVimus laetitiam temporis futuri, dolemus nos hic diutius laborare. Item aliter:
'For we know that every creature groans and is in travail until now.' Those things which can groan, groan on account of excessive toil: because more is demanded of them than they can bear. But those things which have no sense, how do they groan? Unless perhaps they groan on account of our iniquities, just as at the Passion of the Lord the sun fled, because it could not bear to look upon the impiety of the Jews. 'And not only it, but we ourselves also, having the first-fruits of the spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, awaiting the adoption.' Not only the creature, which has no receptacle of the spirit, or carnal men; but even we who have known the joy of the time to come, grieve that we labor here longer. Likewise, in another way:
「因為我們知道,一切受造之物一同歎息、勞苦,直到如今。」那些能歎息的,因過度的勞苦而歎息:因為向它們所求的,過於它們所能擔當的。但那些沒有知覺的,怎能歎息呢?除非或許它們是因我們的罪孽而歎息,正如主受難時日頭隱去,因為它不忍看猶太人的不虔。「不但如此,就是我們這有聖靈初結果子的,也是自己心裡歎息,等候得著兒子的名分。」不僅是那沒有聖靈之居所的受造之物,或屬肉體的人;甚至我們這已認識將來時代之喜樂的人,也因在此勞苦更久而憂傷。同樣,另有一解:
1:203
Non solum angeli, qui nobis benigniores sunt, dolent de iis qui perseverant in delictis; sed etiam nos qur Spiritum sanctum habemus, de talibus ingemiseimus. Redemptionem corporis nostri. Resurrectio Christi est redemptio corporis nostri. Vel exspectamus glorificationem in resurrectionem futuram corporis nostri: ut corruptum hoc induatur incorruptione. Hoc eopilulum obscurum est, inquit Augustinus, quia non satis apparet quam nunc vocet creaturam. Dicitur autem secundum catholicam disciplinam creatura, quidquid fecit et condidit Deus Pater, per unigenitum Filium suum, in unitate Spiritus sancti. Ergo non solum corpora, sed et animæ nostra, id cst spiritus nomine cicaturæ continentur.
Not only the angels, who are more kindly disposed toward us, grieve over those who persevere in offenses; but we also who have the Holy Spirit groan over such people. 'The redemption of our body.' The resurrection of Christ is the redemption of our body. Or: we await the glorification in the future resurrection of our body: that this corruptible may put on incorruption. This little chapter is obscure, says Augustine, because it does not sufficiently appear what he now calls 'creature.' Now according to catholic teaching 'creature' is said of whatever God the Father has made and established, through His only-begotten Son, in the unity of the Holy Spirit. Therefore not only our bodies, but also our souls—that is, under the name of spirit—are contained under 'creature.'
不僅是那些對我們更懷善意的天使,為那些堅持罪過的人憂傷;就是我們這有聖靈的人,也為這樣的人歎息。「我們的身體得贖。」基督的復活就是我們身體的得贖。或說:我們等候將來身體復活時得榮耀:使這必朽壞的穿上不朽壞。奧古斯丁說,這小段是隱晦的,因為不夠清楚他此處所稱的「受造之物」是甚麼。按大公教會的教訓,凡父神藉著祂獨生的子、在聖靈的合一中所造所立的,都稱為「受造之物」。所以不僅我們的身體,就連我們的靈魂——即以靈為名——也都包含在「受造之物」之內。
1:204
Sic autem dictum est, ipsa creatura liberabitur a servitute corruptionio in libertatem gloriæ filiorum Dei: quasi nos non simus creatura, sed filii Dei, in quorum gleriæ libertatem liberabitur a servitute creatum. Item dicit: Scimus enim quod omnis crealura ingemiscit et dolet usque adhuc. Non snlum illa, sed ct nos ipsi, tanquam nos aliud simus, aliud omnis creatura. Totum ergo capitulum particulatim considerandum est. Cxistimo enim (inquit) quod non sint condignae passiones hujus temporis ad futuram gloriam, quæ revelabitur in nobis. Hoc manifestum est: dixerat enim superius: Si autem spiritu facta carnis mortificaverits, vivetis.
But it is said thus: 'The creature itself shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the liberty of the glory of the sons of God': as though we were not creatures, but sons of God, into the liberty of whose glory the creature that was made shall be delivered from bondage. Likewise he says: 'For we know that every creature groans and grieves until now. Not only it, but we ourselves also,' as though we were one thing, and every creature another. The whole chapter therefore must be considered piece by piece. 'For I reckon (he says) that the sufferings of this time are not worthy to be compared with the future glory that shall be revealed in us.' This is clear: for he had said above: 'But if by the Spirit you mortify the deeds of the flesh, you shall live.'
但話是這樣說的:「受造之物自己也必脫離敗壞的轄制,得享神兒女之榮耀的自由」:彷彿我們不是受造之物,而是神的兒女,那受造之物既得脫離轄制,便進入我們兒女榮耀的自由。他又說:「因為我們知道,一切受造之物一同歎息勞苦直到如今。不但如此,就是我們自己」,彷彿我們是一回事,一切受造之物又是另一回事。所以整段必須逐句加以考量。「他說:我想,現在的苦楚若比起將來要顯於我們的榮耀,就不足介意了。」這是明白的:因為他在上文已說:「但你們若靠著聖靈治死身體的惡行,必要活著。」
1:205
Quod fieri non potest sine molestia, cui patientia necessaria est. Quo pertinet, et quod paulo ante ait: Si tamen compatimur, ut et conglorificemur. Quod iiaque ait: Nam et exspectatio creaturae revelationem filiorum Dei exspectat, boc eum puto dicere: Nam et hoc ipsum quod iii nobis dolet, cum facta carnis mortificamus, id est, cum esurimus, vel sitimus per abstinentiam, dum frenamus delectationem concubitus per castilatem; cum injuriarum lacerationes et contumeliarum acu. leos per patientiam sustinemus; dum neglectis atque rejectis voluptatibus nostris, pro fructu matris Ecclesiiæ laboramus:
Which cannot happen without hardship, for which patience is necessary. To this pertains also what he said a little before: 'If indeed we suffer with Him, that we may also be glorified together.' Therefore what he says: 'For the expectation of the creature awaits the revelation of the sons of God,' I think he means this: For this very thing which grieves in us, when we mortify the deeds of the flesh—that is, when we hunger, or thirst through abstinence; while we bridle the delight of intercourse through chastity; when we endure the lacerations of injuries and the stings of insults through patience; while, neglecting and casting off our pleasures, we labor for the fruit of Mother Church:
而這事若無艱難是不能成就的,故此忍耐是必需的。他稍前所說的話也與此有關:「如果我們和祂一同受苦,也必和祂一同得榮耀。」所以他說:「受造之物切望等候神的眾子顯出來」,我想他的意思是這樣:因為那在我們裡面憂傷的,就是當我們治死肉體的作為時——即當我們飢餓,或藉節制而口渴;當我們藉貞潔約束交合之樂;當我們藉忍耐承受傷害的撕裂與凌辱的刺;當我們撇棄並丟開自己的歡愉,為教會之母的果子勞苦時:
1:206
quidquid in nobis in hac atque hujusmodi attritione dolet, creatura est, dolet enim corpus et anima, quae utique creatura est, et exspectat revelationem filiorum Dei, id est exspectat quando apparent quod vocatum est. Quia enim Filius Dei unigeuitus non potest dici creatura, quandoquidsm per ipsum facta sunt omnia quae Deus fecit, distincte etiam nos vocamur creatura ante illam gloria m evidentem; et distincte vocamur filii Dei, quamvis boc adoptione mereamur. Nam ille unigenitus natura filius est.
whatever in us grieves in this and suchlike wearing-down is 'creature,' for both body and soul grieve, which are certainly creature, and it awaits the revelation of the sons of God—that is, it awaits when there shall appear what has been called. For since the only-begotten Son of God cannot be called a creature, seeing that through Him were made all things which God made, we are distinctly called 'creature' before that manifest glory; and we are distinctly called 'sons of God,' although we merit this by adoption. For that Only-begotten is Son by nature.
凡在我們裡面於這種以及類似的耗損中憂傷的,都是「受造之物」,因為身體與靈魂都憂傷,這二者無疑是受造之物,並且它等候神的眾子顯出來——即它等候那被稱呼的將要顯現之時。因為神獨生的子不能被稱為受造之物,既然神所造的萬物都是藉著祂造的,我們在那顯明的榮耀之前便被清楚地稱為「受造之物」;而我們又被清楚地稱為「神的兒女」,儘管我們是藉著兒子的名分才得這稱呼。因為那獨生子按本性乃是子。
1:207
Ergo, exspectatio creaturæ, id est exspectatio nostra, revelationem Dliorum Dei exspectat, hoc est, exspectat quando appareat quod promissum est, quando reipsa manifestandum sit, quod nunc spe sumus; filii enim Dei sumus,et nondum apparuit quid erimus. Scimus enim quia cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus: quia videbimus eum sicuti est. Ipsa est revelatio filiorum Dei, quam nunc exspectat exspectatio creaturæ. Nam quod creatura revelationem exspectat alterius naturae, quia non sit creatura, sed ipsa qualis nunc est, exspectat quando sit qualis futura est. Tanquam si diceretur:
Therefore 'the expectation of the creature,' that is, our expectation, 'awaits the revelation of the sons of God'—that is, it awaits when there shall appear what has been promised, when in reality shall be made manifest what we now are in hope; for we are the sons of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be. 'For we know that when He shall appear, we shall be like Him: because we shall see Him as He is.' This is the revelation of the sons of God, which now the expectation of the creature awaits. For that the creature awaits the revelation of another nature—since it is not a creature, but that very one which now is such as it is—awaits when it shall be such as it is to be. As if it were said:
所以「受造之物的切望」,即我們的切望,「等候神的眾子顯出來」——即它等候那所應許的將要顯現之時,等候那我們如今在盼望中所是的、要在實際中顯明出來之時;因為我們是神的兒女,而我們將來如何,還未顯明。「因為我們知道,主若顯現,我們必要像祂:因為必得見祂的真體。」這就是神眾子的顯明,是如今受造之物的切望所等候的。因為受造之物所等候的,並非另一本性的顯明——既然它不是別的受造之物,乃是它現今這樣的自己——它等候的乃是它要成為那將來之樣式的時候。好比如此說:
1:208
Opere ante pictorem posito, suhjectis sibi coloribus, et ad opus ejus paratis, exspectatio colorum revelationem imaginis exspectat, et manifestationem: non quia tunc alii erunt, aut non colores erunt, sed tantum quod aliam dignitatem tunc habebunt. Vanitati enim subjecta est creatura: hoc est illud: Vanitas vanitatum, et omnia vanitas. Quæ abundantia homini in omni labore suo, quem ipse laborat sub sole: cui est dictum: In labore manducabis panem ? Van tati enim creatura subjecta est non sponte. Bene additum est: Non sponte; homo quippe sponte peccavit, sed non sponte damnatus eit. Peccatnm itaque luit spontaneum, contra præceptumfacere veritatis, peccati autem poena, subjici fallaciæ.
With the work set before the painter, the colors laid ready to hand and prepared for his work, the expectation of the colors awaits the revelation and manifestation of the image: not because they will then be others, or will not be colors, but only that they will then have a different dignity. 'For the creature was made subject to vanity': this is that saying: 'Vanity of vanities, and all is vanity. What abundance has a man in all his labor with which he labors under the sun?'—to whom it was said: 'In labor shalt thou eat bread?' 'For the creature was made subject to vanity not of its own accord.' Well is it added: 'Not of its own accord'; for man indeed sinned of his own accord, but was not condemned of his own accord. Sin therefore was voluntary, to act against the precept of truth; but the punishment of sin is to be made subject to falsehood.
當那作品擺在畫家面前,顏料已置於手邊、為他的工作預備妥當時,顏料的切望便等候那形像的顯明與彰顯:這並非因為它們那時要變為別的,或不再是顏料,乃只因它們那時要有不同的尊貴。「因為受造之物服在虛空之下」:這就是那句話:「虛空的虛空,凡事都是虛空。人在日光之下勞碌所勞的一切,有甚麼益處呢?」——就是那對他所說的:「你必汗流滿面才得糊口」。「因為受造之物服在虛空之下,不是自願的。」加上「不是自願的」是好的;因為人固然是自願犯罪,卻不是自願受定罪。所以罪是出於自願的,就是違背真理的誡命而行;但罪的刑罰,乃是被服在虛謊之下。
1:209
Non ergo sponte vanitati creatura subjecta est, sed propter eum qui subjecit eam in spe, id est propter justitiam atque clementiam: qui neque peccatum impunitum reliquit, nec insanabilem voluit esse peccantem. Quia et ipsa creatura, id est ipse homo, cum jam signaculo imaginis propter peccatum amisso remansit tantum creatura, ipsa itaque creatura, id est ipsa qu.e nondum vocatur filiorum forma perfecta, sed tantum vocatur 'creatura, liberabitur a servitute interitus. Quod itaque ait, et ipsa lilerabitur, facit intelligi et ipsa quemadmodum nos: id est; et de ipsis non est desperandum, qui nondum vocantur filii Dei, quia nondum crediderunt, sed tantum creatura:
Therefore not of its own accord was the creature made subject to vanity, but by reason of Him who subjected it in hope—that is, by reason of righteousness and clemency: who neither left sin unpunished, nor willed the sinner to be incurable. 'Because the creature itself also,' that is, man himself, when, having lost the seal of the image on account of sin, he remained only a creature—that creature, then, that is, that which is not yet called the perfect form of the sons, but is only called 'creature,' shall be delivered from the bondage of destruction. Therefore what he says, 'and it also shall be delivered,' gives us to understand: it also, just as we—that is, we must not despair even of those who are not yet called sons of God, because they have not yet believed, but are only creature:
所以受造之物服在虛空之下並非出於自願,乃是因那叫它在盼望中服在其下者的緣故——即因公義與慈憐:這位既不容罪不受刑罰,也不願罪人無可救治。「因為受造之物自己也」,即人自己,當他因罪失去了那形像的印記,就只剩下作受造之物——這受造之物,即那尚未被稱為兒子完全樣式、僅被稱為「受造之物」的,必得脫離毀滅的轄制。所以他所說的「它也必得釋放」,使我們明白:它也要像我們一樣——即我們對那些尚未被稱為神兒女的人也不當絕望,因為他們雖尚未相信,僅是受造之物:
1:210
quia et ipsi creatura sunt, et liberabuntur a servitute interitus, sicut et nos, qui jam filii Dei sumus, quamvis nondum apparuerit quid erimus. Liberabitur ergo a servitute interitus in libertatem gloriæ filiorum Dei: id est, erunt ipsi ex servis liberi, et ex mortuis glor osi in v ta perfecta, quam habebunt filii Dei. Scimus enim quod omnis creatura ingemiscit et dolet usque adhuc. Omnis creatura in homine numeratur: non quia in eo sint omnes angeli, et supereminentes virtutes ac potestates, cœlum, trra et mare, et omnia quae in eis sunt; sed quia otonis creatura partim spiritalis est, partim animalis, parlim corporalis: sicut in Evangelio dicit: Prædicate Evangelium omui creaturæ.
because they too are creature, and shall be delivered from the bondage of destruction, just as we also who are already sons of God, although it has not yet appeared what we shall be. It shall therefore be delivered from the bondage of destruction into the liberty of the glory of the sons of God: that is, they themselves shall be free from being slaves, and glorious from being dead, in that perfect life which the sons of God shall have. 'For we know that every creature groans and grieves until now.' Every creature is numbered in man: not because all the angels, and the supereminent virtues and powers, heaven, earth and sea, and all things in them, are in him; but because every creature is partly spiritual, partly animal, partly corporeal: as He says in the Gospel: 'Preach the Gospel to every creature.'
因為他們也是受造之物,並必脫離毀滅的轄制得釋放,正如我們這已是神兒女的人一樣,儘管我們將來如何還未顯明。所以它必脫離毀滅的轄制,得進入神兒女之榮耀的自由:即他們必要從奴僕變為自由,從死亡變為榮耀,得著神兒女所要有的那完全的生命。「因為我們知道,一切受造之物一同歎息勞苦直到如今。」一切受造之物都算在人裡面:這並非因為眾天使、以及超卓的權能與掌權者、天、地、海、和其中的萬物都在他裡面;乃是因為一切受造之物有的屬靈、有的屬魂、有的屬身:正如祂在福音中所說:「你們往普天下去,傳福音給萬民聽(給一切受造之物)。」
1:211
Et ad Colessensos: In spe Evangelii, quod prædicatum est in universa creatura quæ sub coe o est. Quod ut ab inferioribus consideremus, corp ralis creatura per loca ostenditur: animalis au em vivificat corporalia: animalis regit, et tunc bene rcg t cum ipsa regendam se subjicit Deo. Cum au em transgreditur praecepta ejus, laboribus et ærumnis per eadem ipsa quæ regere poterat implicatur. Qui ergo vivit corpore, carnalis homo vel animalis vocatur: carnalis, quia carnalia sectatur; animalis autem, qUia fertur dissoIuta lascivia animae suæ, quam non regit spritus, neque coercet intra metas naturalis ordinis, quia et ipse non se subdit regendum Deo.
And to the Colossians: 'In the hope of the Gospel, which was preached in every creature that is under heaven.' That we may consider this from the lower things: corporeal creation is shown by place; but the animal quickens corporeal things; the animal governs, and then governs well when it subjects itself to God to be governed. But when it transgresses His precepts, it is entangled in labors and hardships by those very things which it could have governed. He therefore who lives by the body is called a carnal or an animal man: carnal, because he pursues carnal things; but animal, because he is carried away by the dissolute wantonness of his soul, which the spirit does not govern, nor restrain within the bounds of the natural order, because it too does not submit itself to God to be governed.
又對歌羅西人說:「因福音的盼望,這福音傳到天下一切受造之物。」為使我們從較低之物加以考量:屬身的受造之物藉方位顯明;屬魂的則使屬身之物活過來;屬魂的加以治理,並且當它把自己交付神受治理時,就治理得好。但當它違背祂的誡命時,就被那些它本能治理之物所纏累,陷於勞苦艱難。所以那按身體而活的人,被稱為屬肉體或屬魂的人:屬肉體,因他追求屬肉體之物;屬魂,因他被自己靈魂放縱的邪情所牽引,這靈魂不受靈的治理,也不被約束於自然次序的界限之內,因為它自己也不肯降服於神受治理。
1:212
Qui amem spiritii animam regit, et per animam corpus, quod facere non potest, nisi Dominam habeat et ipse rectorem: qUoniam sicut non potest caput mulieris vir esse, ita caput viri Christus est, vocatur spiritalis, quia et vita cum aliqua molestia nunc agitur: po t autem nullam patietur. Et quoniam summi angeli spiritualiter vivunt, infimi vero animaliter, bestiæ vero el omnia pecora carnaliter, corpus autem non vivit, sed vivificatur, omnis creatura in homine est, quia et intelligit spiritu, et sentit animo, et localiter corpore movetur. Omnis itaque creatura in bomine ingemiscit et dolet:
But he who by the spirit governs the soul, and through the soul the body—which he cannot do unless he himself also has the Lord as his director: since, just as the man cannot be the head of the woman, so Christ is the head of the man—is called spiritual, because even so his life is now passed with some hardship; but afterwards he will suffer none. And since the highest angels live spiritually, but the lowest animally, but the beasts and all cattle carnally, while the body does not live but is quickened, every creature is in man, because he both understands by spirit, and perceives by soul, and moves locally by body. Every creature therefore groans and grieves in man:
但那以靈治理靈魂、又藉靈魂治理身體的人——這事他若不是自己也有主作他的引導者,便不能做到:因為正如男人不能作女人的頭,男人的頭乃是基督——這人被稱為屬靈的,因為即便如此,他今生仍是帶著些許艱難度過的;但此後他就不再受苦了。既然至高的天使屬靈地活著,最低的屬魂地活著,走獸和一切牲畜屬肉體地活著,而身體並非活著、乃是被活化,那麼一切受造之物就都在人裡面,因為人以靈領悟、以魂知覺、又以身體在空間中移動。所以一切受造之物都在人裡面歎息勞苦:
1:213
non enim totam, sed omnem ait, tanquam si quis dicat quod solem omnes homines vident qui sunt incolumes, sed non toti vident, quia tantum oculis vident. Ita in homine omnis creatura est, qui et intelligit, et vivit, et corpus habet; sed non tota ereatnra in ipso est, quia sunt præter ipsum et angeli, qui intelligant, et vivant, et sint; et pecora, quæ vivunt ct sunt, el corpora, quæ tantummodo sunt: cum ipsum vivere magis sit quam non vivere; et ipsum intelligere magis sit quam sine int' llectu vivere. Cum erga miser homo ingemiscit et dolet, omnis creatura congemiscit et dolet.
for he did not say 'the whole,' but 'every,' as if someone should say that all men who are unharmed see the sun, but do not see with their whole selves, because they see only with their eyes. So in man is every creature, who both understands, and lives, and has a body; but not the whole creature is in him, because there are besides him both angels, who understand, and live, and are; and cattle, which live and are; and bodies, which merely are: since to live itself is more than not to live, and to understand itself is more than to live without understanding. When therefore wretched man groans and grieves, every creature groans together and grieves.
因為他不是說「全體」,而是說「每一樣」,好比有人說,凡無損傷的人都看見日頭,卻不是以其全身看見,因為他們只用眼睛看見。照樣,一切受造之物都在人裡面,人既領悟、又活著、又有身體;但受造之物並非全體都在他裡面,因為在他之外還有天使,天使領悟、活著、並存在;又有牲畜,牲畜活著並存在;又有物體,物體僅僅存在:因為活著本身勝過不活著,而領悟本身勝過無領悟地活著。所以當可憐的人歎息勞苦時,一切受造之物就一同歎息勞苦。
1:214
Usque adhuc autem tecle dixit, quia etiamsi sunt aliqua jam in sinu Abrahæ, et latro ille in paradiso constitutus, illo die quo credidit, dolere destiterit; tamen usque adhuc omnis creatura congemiscit et dolet, quia in illis qui nondum liberati sunt, omnis esi per spiritum et corpus et animam. Non solum autem, inquit; omnis creatura congemiscit et dolet, sed et nos ipsi. Id est; non solum in homine corpus, et anima, et spiritus simul dolent ex difficultatibus corporis; sed et nos ipsi exceptis corporibus in nobis ipsis congemiscimus. Et bene dixit: Primitias habentes spiritus: id est, qUOrum jam spiritus tanquam sacrificium oblati sunt Deo, et in divino charitatis igne comprehensi sunt.
But he rightly said 'until now,' because even if there are already some in Abraham's bosom, and that thief established in paradise had ceased to grieve on the day he believed; nevertheless until now every creature groans together and grieves, because in those who are not yet delivered there is the 'every' through spirit and body and soul. 'And not only,' he says, 'does every creature groan together and grieve, but we ourselves also.' That is: not only in man do body, and soul, and spirit grieve together from the difficulties of the body; but we ourselves also, apart from our bodies, groan together within our very selves. And well did he say: 'Having the first-fruits of the spirit,' that is, those whose spirit has already been offered to God as a sacrifice, and has been laid hold of in the divine fire of charity.
但他說「直到如今」是正確的,因為儘管已有些人在亞伯拉罕的懷裡,而那強盜在他相信的那日就已被安置在樂園裡、止住了憂傷;然而直到如今一切受造之物仍一同歎息勞苦,因為在那些尚未得釋放的人裡面,就藉著靈、身、魂而有那「每一樣」。他說:「不但如此,一切受造之物一同歎息勞苦,就是我們自己也是如此。」意思是說:不僅在人裡面,身、魂、靈因身體的艱難而一同憂傷;就是我們自己,除了身體以外,也在自己裡面一同歎息。他說得好:「有聖靈的初結果子」,即那些靈已作為祭物獻與神、並已被神那愛的火所抓住的人。
1:215
Hæc sum primitiæ hominis, quia veritas primum spiritum nostrum obtinet, ut per hunc caetera comprehendantur; vel quia primi spiritum ipso adventu redemptionis accepimus. Jam ergo habet primitias oblatas Deo, qui dicit: Mente serv o legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati. Et qui dicit: Deus cui sermo in spiritu meo. Et de quo d.citur: Spiritus quidem promptus, caro autem infirma. Sed quoniam adhuc dicit: Infelix ego homo, quis me liberabit a corpore mortis hujus? et adhuc alibi dicitur: Vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra, et propter Spiritum ejus manentem in vobis: nondum est holocaustum; erit autem, cum absorhebitur mors in victor a, cum ei dicetur: Ubi est, mors, contentio tua?
These are the first-fruits of man, because truth first takes possession of our spirit, so that through this the rest may be laid hold of; or because we first received the spirit at the very coming of redemption. Therefore he already has the first-fruits offered to God who says: 'With the mind I serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin.' And he who says: 'God, to whom is my speaking in my spirit.' And of whom it is said: 'The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.' But since he still says: 'Wretched man that I am, who shall deliver me from the body of this death?' and still elsewhere it is said: 'He will quicken even your mortal bodies, and because of His Spirit remaining in you': it is not yet a holocaust; but it will be, when death shall be swallowed up in victory, when it shall be said to it: 'Where is thy strife, O death?'
這些是人的初結果子,因為真理首先佔有我們的靈,好叫其餘的藉此被抓住;或因為我們在救贖來臨之時首先領受了靈。所以,凡說「我以心思順服神的律,卻以肉體順服罪之律」的人,就已有初結果子獻與神了。又如那說「神,就是我在我靈裡向祂陳明的」的人。並且是那論到他所說的:「心靈固然願意,肉體卻軟弱了。」但既然他仍說:「我這苦人哪,誰能救我脫離這死亡的身體呢?」又在別處仍說:「祂必因住在你們裡面的靈,使你們必死的身體活過來」:這就還不是全牲的燔祭;但將來必是,就是當死被得勝吞滅之時,就是對它說:「死啊,你的爭競在哪裡?」
1:216
ubi est, mors, aculeus tnus? Nunc ergo, inquit, non solum omnis creatura, id est, eum corpore; sednos ipsi primitias Spiritus habentes, id esi, nos animæ quia primitias mentes nostras obtulimus Den, in nobis ipsis congemiscimus: id est, præter corpus adoptionem exspectantes redemptionem corporis nostri: id est, ut et ipsum corpus accipiens beneficium adoptionis filiorum qua vocati sumus, totos nos liberatos transactis molestiis omnibus ex omni parte Dei filios esse manifestet. Spe enim salvi facti sumus. Spes autem quæ videtur, non est spes. Tunc ergo erit res, quæ nunc csl spes, cum apparuerit quid erimus similes illi, quoniam videbimus eum sicuti esi.
'Where, O death, is thy sting?' Now therefore, he says, not only does every creature—that is, together with the body—but we ourselves, having the first-fruits of the Spirit—that is, we souls, because we have offered our minds as first-fruits to God—groan within ourselves: that is, apart from the body, awaiting the adoption, the redemption of our body: that is, so that the body itself also, receiving the benefit of the adoption of sons by which we have been called, may show us wholly delivered, all our troubles being passed, to be sons of God on every side. 'For by hope we were saved. But hope that is seen is not hope.' Then therefore will that be a reality, which now is hope, when it shall appear that we are like Him, since we shall see Him as He is.
「死啊,你的毒鉤在哪裡?」他說,所以如今不僅一切受造之物——即連同身體——就是我們自己,這有聖靈初結果子的——即我們這些靈魂,因為我們已把自己的心思作為初結果子獻與神——也在自己裡面歎息:即除了身體以外,等候得著兒子的名分、就是我們身體的得贖:即好叫身體本身也領受那使我們蒙召的兒子名分之恩益,在一切患難都已過去之後,顯明我們完全得釋放,各方面都作神的兒女。「因為我們得救是在乎盼望。只是所見的盼望不是盼望。」所以那如今是盼望的,將要成為實際,就是當顯明我們像祂之時,因為我們必得見祂的真體。
1:217
Hoc capitulum si hoc modo, ut tractatum est, aperitur, non incidemus in illas molestias quibns homines plerique ditere coguntur, omnes angelos, sublimesque virtutes in dolore et gemit bus esse, antequam nos penitus liberemur: quia dictum est: Omnis creatura congemiscit et dolet. Quamvis enim adjuvent nos pro sua sublimitate, dum obtemperant Deo, qui unicum Filium suum dignatus est pro nobis mittere; tamen sine gemitu et doloribus id facere credendi sunt, ne miseri existimentur, feliciorque ille sit de numero nostro Lazarus, qui jam in Abrahæ sinu requiescit:, præsertim quia dixit, eamdem creaturam, quæ congemiscit et dolet, vanitati esse subjectam:
If this chapter is opened up in this manner, as it has been treated, we shall not fall into those difficulties by which very many men are compelled to say that all the angels and sublime virtues are in grief and groaning before we are wholly delivered: because it is said, 'Every creature groans together and grieves.' For although they help us according to their sublimity, while they obey God, who deigned to send His only Son for us; nevertheless they are to be believed to do this without groaning and grief, lest they be thought wretched, and Lazarus—of our number—who already rests in Abraham's bosom, be more blessed: especially since he said that the same creature, which groans and grieves, was made subject to vanity:
這一段若照這樣被闡明,如上文所處理的,我們就不會陷入那些困難,就是許多人被迫說:一切天使與崇高的權能,在我們完全得釋放之前,都處於憂傷歎息之中:因為經上說:「一切受造之物一同歎息勞苦。」因為雖然天使按其崇高幫助我們,並順服那甘願為我們差遣獨生子的神;然而應當相信天使行這事並無歎息與憂傷,免得他們被看為可憐,倒使我們同類中那已在亞伯拉罕懷裡安息的拉撒路更為有福:尤其他既說,那同一個歎息勞苦的受造之物,是服在虛空之下的:
1:218
quod de summis et excellentibus virtutum po estatumque creaturis neras est credere Deinde liberari eam dixit a servitute interitus, quo i los cecidisse, qui in caelis agunt vitam beatissimam, non possumus credere. Tamen nihil temere confirmandum esi, et pia diligentia etiam atque etiam verba divina tractanda sunt: ne forte cum gemiscit et dolet, et vanitati subjecta est, possit aliquo alio modo intelligi, ut de summis angelis, quandiu nostrae infirmitati jussu Domini non opitulan ur, non impe possit existimari. Sed sive illa, q'tam exsecuti sunus, sive alia bujus capituli expositio proferatur, id tantum est cavendum, ne violet aut vulneret catholicam fidem:
which it is impious to believe of the highest and most excellent creatures among the virtues and powers. Then he said it was delivered from the bondage of destruction, into which we cannot believe those to have fallen who lead a most blessed life in the heavens. Yet nothing must be rashly affirmed, and the divine words must be handled again and again with pious diligence: lest perhaps, when 'it groans and grieves, and is made subject to vanity,' it might be able to be understood in some other way, so that concerning the highest angels—as long as, by the Lord's command, they do not succor our weakness—it might not be possible to reckon it. But whether that exposition which we have carried out, or another of this chapter be brought forward, this only must be guarded against, that it neither violate nor wound the catholic faith:
因為若把這話信為指著權能與掌權者中至高至卓的受造之物,乃是不虔的。他又說,它得脫離毀滅的轄制,而我們不能相信那些在諸天中度至福生活的存在曾陷入這轄制。然而,甚麼都不可輕率斷定,神的話語必須以虔敬的殷勤一再加以處理:免得或許那「歎息勞苦、並服在虛空之下」的話,能以別的方式被理解,以致論到至高的天使——只要他們按主的命令不援助我們的軟弱——這話也不能被算在他們身上。但無論是我們所作的這解釋,或本段另一種解釋被提出,只有這一點必須防範,就是不可違背或傷害大公信仰:
1:219
scio enim vanos multos bxreticos multa impie et inepte jactitasse. Spe enim salvi facti sumusSpe. inquit, non reipsa salus speratur adlm sieut ad Corinthios: Per fidem ambulamus, non per spectem; credimus quod futuri sumus, adhuc tamen non sumus. Spes autem quæ videtur, non est spes. Nam quod videt quis, quid sperit? QuOd videtur non speratur, quia tenetur. Si autem quod non videmus speramus. Ideo palienlia per fidem magnam habet mercedem, quia sperat quod non videt; et sic securi sumus, quasi jam acceperimus quod nondum accepimus. Per patientiam exspectamus. Spes sine patientia esse non potest. Similiter autem et spiritas adjuvat.
For I know that many empty heretics have boasted much that is impious and foolish. 'For by hope we are saved.' By hope, he says, salvation is hoped for, not yet in the reality itself; just as it is said to the Corinthians: 'We walk by faith, not by sight.' We believe that we shall be what we are not yet. 'But hope that is seen is not hope. For what a man sees, why does he hope for?' What is seen is not hoped for, because it is already held. 'But if we hope for that which we see not,' therefore patience through faith has a great reward, because it hopes for what it does not see; and thus we are secure, as though we had already received what we have not yet received. 'By patience we wait for it.' Hope cannot exist without patience. 'And in like manner the Spirit also helpeth.'
因為我知道許多空洞的異端者誇口了許多不敬虔而愚昧的話。「因為我們得救是在乎盼望。」他說,救恩是藉著盼望而被盼望,尚未在實際之中;正如對哥林多人所說的:「我們行事為人是憑著信心,不是憑著眼見。」我們相信我們將要成為現今尚未成為的樣式。「但所盼望的若已看見,就不是盼望了;誰還盼望他所看見的呢?」所看見的就不再被盼望,因為它已被握有。「但我們若盼望那所未見的」,所以藉信心而有的忍耐有極大的賞賜,因為它盼望所未見的;如此我們便得穩妥,彷彿已經領受了那尚未領受的。「我們就藉著忍耐等候。」盼望不能沒有忍耐而存在。「照樣,聖靈也幫助我們。」
1:220
Secundum eamdem exspectationem adjovat spiritus infirmitatcm orationis, ut quæ Dei sunt oremus, et propter spem quæ placita sunt Deo postulemus. Infirmitatem nostram. Infirma est oratio nostra, nisi a Spiritu sancto non solnm adjuvelur, sed etiam inspire ur. Nam quid oremus? Frequenter quae putamus prospera, obsunt: ideo non conceduntur, Deo melius providente: sicut Paulus ter Dominum rogavit. Sicu, oportet nescimus. Quia nunc per speculum videmus, sicut ad Corinthios ait: Si quis existimat se scire, nondum scivit qnem edmodum oporteat eum scire. Sed ipse Spiritus postulat pre nobis. Qnomodo nos tentat tit sciat, hoc est, ut scire nos ficiat; s cut dicitur:
According to this same waiting, the Spirit helps the weakness of our prayer, so that we may pray for the things which are God's, and, on account of hope, may ask for the things which are pleasing to God. 'Our weakness.' Our prayer is weak, unless it be not only helped by the Holy Spirit but even inspired by Him. For what should we pray? Often the things we think prosperous are harmful; therefore they are not granted, since God provides better, just as Paul three times besought the Lord. 'We know not what we should pray for as we ought.' Because now we see through a glass, as he says to the Corinthians: 'If any man think that he knoweth anything, he hath not yet known as he ought to know.' 'But the Spirit himself asketh for us.' How does He tempt us, that He may know—that is, that He may make us to know—as it is said:
照著這同樣的等候,聖靈幫助我們禱告的軟弱,使我們能為神的事禱告,並因盼望而祈求那些蒙神喜悅的事。「我們的軟弱。」我們的禱告是軟弱的,除非它不僅被聖靈幫助,甚至被聖靈感動。因為我們該禱告甚麼呢?我們常以為亨通的事,反而有害;因此不蒙應允,因神有更美的安排,正如保羅三次求過主。「我們本不曉得當怎樣禱告。」因為如今我們是對著鏡子觀看,正如他對哥林多人所說的:「若有人以為自己知道甚麼,按他所當知道的,他仍是不知道。」「但聖靈親自為我們祈求。」祂如何試驗我們,好叫祂知道——就是說,好叫祂使我們知道——正如所說的:
1:221
Ille ædificavit domum, cujns jussu fit, sic et Spiritus sanctus postulat, id est postulare nos fudit quae Dei sunt, iuspirando, vet præstando, aut operando in nobis. Gemitibus inenarrabilibus. Gemere nos facit ahis gemitibus mutis: quia quantum ore petere non possumus, tantum' gemitibus deprecamur. Qui autem scrutatur corda scit quid desiderat spiritus. Hic gratiam spiritus nomiHavit Spiritnm sanctum, sicut ibi: Si oravero I ngua, spiritus meus orat: ubi genus linguae vel locutio intellecta accipitur. Quia secundum Deum. Quia cœlestia et divina desiderai. Postulat pro sanctis. Pro sanctis rebus, non humanis, neque terrenis. Scimus autem quomodo diligentibus Deum omnia cooperantur in bonum.
'He built the house at whose command it is made,' so also the Holy Spirit intercedes, that is, He pours forth in us the asking for the things which are God's, by inspiring, or bestowing, or working in us. 'With unspeakable groanings.' He makes us groan with other, mute groanings: because as much as we cannot ask with the mouth, so much we implore with groanings. 'But he who searcheth the hearts knoweth what the Spirit desireth.' Here he has named the grace of the Spirit the Holy Spirit, just as there: 'If I pray in a tongue, my spirit prayeth,' where the kind of tongue or of speech is understood. 'Because it is according to God.' Because He desires heavenly and divine things. 'He asketh for the saints.' For holy things, not human, nor earthly. 'And we know that to them that love God all things work together unto good.'
「那位吩咐建造房屋的,就建造了房屋」,照樣聖靈也代求,就是說,祂藉著感動、賜予或在我們裡面運行,將對神之事的祈求傾注在我們裡面。「用說不出來的歎息。」祂使我們用另一種無聲的歎息歎息:因為凡我們口中不能求的,我們就用歎息懇求。「鑒察人心的,曉得聖靈的意思。」這裡他將聖靈的恩典稱為聖靈,正如那裡所說:「我若用方言禱告,是我的靈禱告」,那裡所指的是某種言語或話語。「因為是照著神。」因為祂所渴慕的是屬天與屬神的事。「祂為聖徒祈求。」為著聖潔的事,不為人的事,也不為屬地的事。「我們曉得萬事都互相效力,叫愛神的人得益處。」
1:222
Quæcunque fecerimus, vel fuerimus passi propter dilectionem, omnia nobis ad mercedem concurrunt: sive cooperantur, hoc est crescunt; sive aduvante Deo conlra vertuntur in prosperum, secundum illud: Omnia quæcunque feceris, prosperabuntur. His qui secundum. Sicut et nos dicit anle mundi constitutionem electos. Propesitum vocati sunt sancti. Propositum Dei est, ut sine operibus legis, vef quibuscunque aliis meritis per fidem solum justificaret impios, quæ fides Ron ex natura, sed Dei donum est: fructus spiritus est inter caetera et fides. Non enim omnes vocati, secundum propositum sunt vocati; quoniam multi vocati, pauci electi.
Whatever we shall have done, or shall have suffered for love's sake, all things run together for us unto reward: whether they 'work together,' that is, increase; or by God's help are turned against adversity into prosperity, according to that word: 'Whatsoever thou shalt do shall prosper.' 'To them that according to' His purpose. Just as He also calls us elect before the foundation of the world. 'According to His purpose they are called saints.' It is God's purpose that, without the works of the law, or any other merits, He should justify the ungodly by faith alone—which faith is not from nature, but is the gift of God: among the rest, the fruit of the Spirit is also faith. For not all who are called are called according to His purpose; since 'many are called, but few are chosen.'
凡我們為愛所行的,或所受的,一切都為我們的賞賜同工:或是「互相效力」,就是增長;或是藉神的幫助,將患難轉化為亨通,正如那話所說:「凡你所行的,盡都亨通。」「照祂旨意」的人。正如祂也在創世以前揀選我們為選民。「照著旨意被召的乃是聖徒。」神的旨意乃是:祂不憑律法的行為,也不憑任何別的功德,只憑信稱不敬虔的人為義——這信不是出於本性,乃是神的恩賜:在其餘各樣之中,聖靈的果子也包括信。因為並非一切被召的都是照祂旨意被召的;因為「被召的人多,選上的人少。」
1:223
Ipsi ergo secundum propositum votati, qui et electi ante constitutionem mundi. Nam quos præscivit et prædestinavit conformes fieri imaginis Filii sui. Prædestinavit, ut qui dono ejus conformis esset in vita, esset conformis in gloria: qui transfo rmavit corpus humilitatis nostrae conforme corpori claritatis suæ. Unde et Joannes: Simdes ci erimus. Ut sit ipse primogenitus in multis fratribus. Primogenilus ex moituis, quia habet multos prae er se. Quos autem prædestinavit. Hic praedestinatio in temporibus intelligitur, non in hujus temporis hominibus: id est, et ante legem, sub lege et sub gratia. Sed quicunque tunc salvati sunt, Dei gratia sunt salvati, dicente Apostolo:
These, therefore, are called according to His purpose, who are also chosen before the foundation of the world. 'For whom He foreknew He also predestinated to be made conformable to the image of His Son.' He predestinated, so that he who by His gift was conformed to Him in life should be conformed also in glory: He 'who transformed the body of our lowliness, conformable to the body of His glory.' Whence also John: 'We shall be like Him.' 'That He might be the firstborn among many brethren.' The firstborn from the dead, because He has many before Himself. 'And whom He predestinated.' Here predestination is understood as belonging to times, not to the men of this particular time: that is, both before the law, under the law, and under grace. But whosoever were then saved, were saved by the grace of God, as the Apostle says:
所以這些人是照祂旨意被召的,也是在創世以前被揀選的。「因為祂預先所知道的人,就預先定下效法祂兒子的模樣。」祂預先定下,好叫那藉祂的恩賜在生命上效法祂的人,也在榮耀上效法祂:祂「要將我們這卑賤的身體改變形狀,和祂自己榮耀的身體相似。」因此約翰也說:「我們必要像祂。」「叫祂在許多弟兄中作長子。」祂是從死裡復活的長子,因為有許多人在祂之後。「祂所預定的人。」這裡的預定是指著各時代而言的,不是指這特定時代的人:就是說,包括律法以前、律法之下和恩典之下。但凡那時得救的,都是靠神的恩典得救的,正如使徒所說:
1:224
Habentes autem eumdem spiritum fidei. Hos et vocavit. Homines in hoc tempore ad fidem vocavit, quia apud eum antequam mundus esset. erant vocati. 'Vocantur autem per fidei inspirationem, et per exhortationem, et divina operatione, justificantur per baptismum, glorificantur per præmium, sive in præs. nti per virtutem; sed hæc omnia sunt dona Dei: quia' dicit alibi: Ut dignetur vos vocatione sti. Et jljud: Qui vos vocavit in gratia Dei, juslificati gratis, qui operatur omnia in omnibus: quia ipse nos eripuit de potestate tenebrarum, et transtulit in regnum dilectionis suae: non ipsius, sed Filii. Et quos vocavit, AIOS et justificavit; quos autem justificavit, illos et magnificavit.
'Having the same spirit of faith.' 'These He also called.' He called men in this time unto faith, because with Him, before the world existed, they had already been called. They are called through the inspiration of faith, and through exhortation, and by divine working; they are justified through baptism, glorified through the reward, whether in the present through virtue; but all these are gifts of God: for he says elsewhere, 'That He would count you worthy of your calling'; and that other saying, 'Who called you in the grace of God,' being 'justified freely,' who 'worketh all in all': because He Himself rescued us from the power of darkness and translated us into the kingdom of His love—not His own, but that of the Son. 'And whom He called, them He also justified; and whom He justified, them He also magnified.'
「我們既有信心的靈。」「這些人祂又召了他們。」祂在這時候召人歸信,因為在世界未有以先,他們在祂那裡已經蒙召。他們是藉著信心的感動、藉著勸勉並藉神的運行而蒙召;藉洗禮稱義,藉賞賜得榮耀,或在今世藉美德得榮耀;但這一切都是神的恩賜:因為他在別處說:「叫祂看你們配得過所蒙的召」;還有那話:「那藉神的恩召你們的」,「如今卻蒙神的恩典,白白地稱義」,「祂在眾人裡面運行一切」:因為祂親自救我們脫離黑暗的權勢,把我們遷到祂所愛之子的國裡——不是祂自己的國,乃是聖子的國。「祂所召來的人,又稱他們為義;所稱為義的人,又叫他們得榮耀。」
1:225
Magnum est tibi vocari servum meum; quos post resurrectionem glorificaturus est. Illa omnia jam facta sunt, præscivit, prædestinavit, vocavit, et justificavit. Quoniam et omnes jam præsciti et prædestinati sunt, et multi jam vocati atque justificati. Quod autem ait: Illos et glurificavit, illa gloria intelligenda est hic, de qua idem dicit: Cam Chritus apparuerit vita vestra, tunc et vos apparebitis cum illo in gloria. Quid ergo dicemus ad Hæc ? Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos ? Si Deus nos adjuvat, quis nobis nocebit? Si Deus gratis nos vult justificare, quis dicit; Non potest licri?
'It is a great thing for thee to be called my servant': those whom, after the resurrection, He will glorify. All those things have already been done—He foreknew, predestinated, called, and justified. Since all have already been foreknown and predestinated, and many have already been called and justified. But as to what he says, 'Them He also glorified,' that glory is here to be understood of which the same one speaks: 'When Christ, your life, shall appear, then shall you also appear with Him in glory.' 'What then shall we say to these things? If God be for us, who is against us?' If God helps us, who shall harm us? If God wishes to justify us freely, who says: It cannot be done?
「你稱為我的僕人是大有意義的」:就是祂在復活之後要使之得榮耀的那些人。那一切事都已成就了——祂預先知道、預先定下、召了、又稱為義。因為眾人都已被預知並被預定,許多人也已蒙召並稱義。至於他所說的「又叫他們得榮耀」,這榮耀在此當按著那同一位所說的來理解:「基督是我們的生命,祂顯現的時候,你們也要與祂一同顯現在榮耀裡。」「這樣,我們對這些事還有甚麼說的呢?神若幫助我們,誰能敵擋我們呢?」神若幫助我們,誰能害我們呢?神若願白白地稱我們為義,誰能說:這是不可能的呢?
1:226
Vult ostendere multum esse quod accepimus, et quod nemo prævaleat impedire voluntatem Dei, qui quod vult facit. Qui etiam proprio Filio suo non pepercit, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit illum: quomodo non etium cum illo omnia no6s donavit ? Non pcpercit permittendo tradi, ut et traden:ibus libertas permaneret a:bitrii ad peccandum, et nob s patientiae monstraret exemplum. Nain Christo quid habet cbarius quod nobis neget, qui pro nobis proprio Filio non pep rcit? Non solum autem a Patre est traditus, sed a semetipso, sicuti alibi dicit: Qui tradidit semetipsum oblationem et odorem Deo in odorem suavitatis. Quis accusabit electos Dei? Quis accusabit quos Deus elegit, et fecit credentes in se?
He wishes to show that what we have received is a great thing, and that no one prevails to hinder the will of God, who does what He wills. 'He who spared not even His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all: how hath He not also, with Him, given us all things?' He spared Him not, by permitting Him to be delivered up, so that freedom of choice unto sinning might remain even to those who delivered Him, and that He might show us an example of patience. For what has Christ dearer that He would deny us, who for us spared not His own Son? Moreover, He was delivered up not only by the Father, but by Himself, as he says elsewhere: 'Who delivered Himself an offering and a sacrifice to God for an odour of sweetness.' 'Who shall accuse the elect of God?' Who shall accuse those whom God has chosen, and has made to believe in Him?
他要指明我們所領受的乃是大事,並且無人能攔阻神的旨意,因祂隨自己的意思行事。「神既不愛惜自己的兒子,為我們眾人捨了,豈不也把萬物和祂一同白白地賜給我們嗎?」祂藉著容許聖子被交付而不愛惜祂,好叫那些交付祂的人仍存自由的抉擇去犯罪,也好叫祂給我們留下忍耐的榜樣。因為基督既為我們不愛惜自己的兒子,還有甚麼更寶貴的是祂會拒絕給我們的呢?並且,祂不僅被父交付,也是被自己交付的,正如他在別處所說:「祂把自己獻上,作為馨香的供物和祭物獻與神。」「誰能控告神所揀選的人呢?」誰能控告神所揀選、又使他們信祂的人呢?
1:227
Deus signis et virtutibus jam esse justos probat, contra eos qui dicunt: Non sunt justi, nisi quos lex justificave rit: cum tunc onmia fuerantsub peccato conclusa. Si quasi confirmans pronunties, quanta perversitas oriatur? Sic ergo pronuntiandum est, ac si diceretur: Deusne quid justificat? ut subandiatur: Non utique Deus qui justificat. Subaudiendo: Nunquid Deus qui per eos signa et mirabilia facit, qui eos gratis justificavit? Quis est qui condemnet? Quasi interrogat: Quis est qui condemnet? aut dimittet? Intelligendum esi: Nunquid Christus? Et respondet: Qui mortuus est pro nobis, ipse nos condemnat ? Absit. Imo qui et resurrexit, et est in beatitudine Patris.
God proves by signs and mighty works that they are already just, against those who say: There are none just except those whom the law has justified—when at that time all things were shut up under sin. If you were to pronounce it as though affirming, how great a perversity would arise? Thus therefore it must be pronounced, as if it were said: 'Is it God who justifieth anything?'—so that it may be understood: Surely it is not God who justifies? Understanding: Is it not God who through them does signs and wonders, who has justified them freely? 'Who is he that condemneth?' As if he asks: Who is he that condemns? or that dismisses? It must be understood: Surely not Christ? And he answers: Does He who died for us Himself condemn us? God forbid. Nay rather, He who also rose again, and is in the blessedness of the Father.
神藉著神蹟和大能證明他們已經稱義,駁斥那些說「除了律法所稱義的人以外,沒有義人」的人——那時萬物都被囚在罪裡。你若彷彿肯定地宣稱這話,會生出何等的悖謬呢?所以當如此宣讀,彷彿說:「豈是神稱義甚麼嗎?」——好叫人明白:難道不是稱義的神嗎?領會此意:豈不是那藉他們行神蹟奇事、白白稱他們為義的神嗎?「誰能定他們的罪呢?」彷彿他問:誰能定罪呢?或誰能赦免呢?當如此領會:難道是基督嗎?他回答說:那為我們死的,難道會定我們的罪嗎?斷乎不能。反倒是那已經復活、如今在父的福樂中的主。
1:228
Qui sicut per servi formam rogat pro nobis Patrem, et etiam nos exaud t cum Patre, nunquid ipse nos accusabit aut condemnabit? Christus Jesus qui mortuus est: imo qui resurrexit. Ille nos tantum dilexit, ut etiam moreretur pro nobis. Qui est ad dexteram Dei. Ubi ille est, et nos venturi sumus; secundum hominem tractat, secundum quem mortuus est, et primogenitus factus ex mortuis. Qui etiam interpellat pro nobis. Solent Ariani dicere: Minor est qui interpellat. Respondendum e t Dominum oblivionem non pati, ut pro illis semper commoneatur quos ipse justificavit.
He who, as in the form of a servant, entreats the Father for us, and also, together with the Father, hears us—will He Himself accuse or condemn us? 'Christ Jesus who died'—nay, rather who rose again. He loved us so greatly that He even died for us. 'Who is at the right hand of God.' Where He is, thither we too shall come; he treats of Him according to the manhood, according to which He died, and was made 'the firstborn from the dead.' 'Who also maketh intercession for us.' The Arians are wont to say: He who intercedes is the lesser. It must be answered that the Lord suffers no forgetfulness, so that He is ever mindful on behalf of those whom He Himself has justified.
祂既取了僕人的形像,為我們求父,又與父一同垂聽我們——祂豈會親自控告或定我們的罪嗎?「基督耶穌已經死了」——不,倒是已經復活了。祂如此深愛我們,甚至為我們捨命。「祂如今在神的右邊。」祂在哪裡,我們也必到那裡去;他是按著人性論到祂,就是按著祂所死並成為「從死裡首生的」那人性。「祂也替我們祈求。」亞流派慣常說:那代求的是較小的。當回答說:主並無遺忘,好叫祂常為祂親自所稱為義的人記念。
1:229
Sed in hoc interpellare dicitur, dum semper bominem, quem suscepit glorificatum, quasi nostrum pignus Patri ostendit et offert, ut verus et æternus Sacerdos. Per quem hominem et minor dicitur: sicut anima et corpus ex diversa substantia unus est homo, ita Deus et homo, ex diversa substantia unus est Christus. Ac per hoc cum sit ipse unus ex diversa substantia, ipse se quodam modo petit, ipse quodammodo pro nobis exaudit. Quis nos separabit a charitate Christi? tribulatio, an angustia, an fames, an persecutio, an nuditas, an pericilum, an gladius? sicut scriptum est. Judæi illos separare volebant a Christo, volentes eos ad legis custodiam revocare.
But He is said to intercede in this, that He ever shows and offers to the Father the man, whom He has taken up and glorified, as it were our pledge, as the true and eternal Priest. Through which manhood He is also called the lesser: just as soul and body, of diverse substance, are one man, so God and man, of diverse substance, are one Christ. And by this, since He Himself is one of diverse substance, He in a certain manner petitions Himself, He in a certain manner hears for us. 'Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or famine, or persecution, or nakedness, or peril, or the sword?' as it is written. The Jews wished to separate them from Christ, wishing to recall them to the keeping of the law.
但祂被說為代求,是在於這一點:祂常將祂所取來並使之得榮耀的那人,彷彿我們的憑質,作為真實而永遠的祭司,向父顯明並獻上。祂也因這人性被稱為較小的:正如魂與體,本質相異,卻是一個人,照樣神與人,本質相異,卻是一位基督。因此,既然祂自己是本質相異的合一者,祂就在某種意義上向自己祈求,也在某種意義上為我們垂聽。「誰能使我們與基督的愛隔絕呢?難道是患難嗎?是困苦嗎?是飢餓嗎?是逼迫嗎?是赤身露體嗎?是危險嗎?是刀劍嗎?」正如經上所記。猶太人想要使他們與基督隔絕,想要把他們拉回去遵守律法。
1:230
Post tanta et tam præclara beneficia et promissa, quis nobis tale aliquid dabit aut promittet, ut a Christo merito recedamus, qui ctiam animam suam posuit pro nobis? Quia propter te mortificamur tota die, existimati sumus utoves occisionis. Beati estis cum vos persequuntur propter me. Et, propter te, ait, non propter aliquod crimen morte aflic mur: et propter te mortem sustinemus cum vicem referre possimus. In nobis maxime impletur hoc testimonium, quibus nec resistere licet, ese.plum magistri et domini sequentibus, qui velut ovis ad occisionem ductus cst. Sed in his omnibus supera. mus, propter eum qui dlexit nos.
After benefits and promises so great and so illustrious, who will give or promise us any such thing, that we should with reason depart from Christ, who even laid down His own soul for us? 'For thy sake we are put to death all the day long; we are counted as sheep for the slaughter.' 'Blessed are ye when they persecute you for my sake.' And, for thy sake, he says, not for any crime, are we afflicted with death; and for thy sake we endure death, when we could render like for like. In us most of all is this testimony fulfilled, to whom it is not even permitted to resist, following the example of our Master and Lord, who was 'led as a sheep to the slaughter.' But 'in all these things we overcome, because of Him that loved us.'
在如此偉大而輝煌的恩惠與應許之後,誰能給我們或應許我們甚麼,叫我們有理由離開基督呢——祂甚至為我們捨了自己的性命?「我們為你的緣故終日被殺,人看我們如將宰的羊。」「人若因我的緣故逼迫你們,你們就有福了。」他說,是為你的緣故,不是因甚麼罪,我們才受死之苦;為你的緣故我們忍受死亡,即使我們本可以以牙還牙。這見證最完全地應驗在我們身上,我們甚至不被允許抵抗,乃是效法我們的夫子和主的榜樣,祂「像羊被牽到宰殺之地」。然而「在這一切的事上,我們因那愛我們的,已經得勝有餘」。
1:231
Ilas omnes tribulationes ad nihilum ducimus propter eum qui etiam nos tantum dilexit, ut pro nobis moreretur: et quando pro cjus nomine morimur, tunc maxime triumphamus. Certus sum enim, quod neque mors, neque vita. Certus sum: quia nec si, mihi quis mortem minetur, nec si vitam promittat aeternam. Neque angeli. Nec si se angelum a Deo dicat directum: sicut ipse ad Galatas ait. Neque principatus,neque instantia. Nec si in praesenti honorem conferat. Neque futura. Ncque si præsentia bona, et in futuro gloriam promittat. Necque fortitudo. Neque si virtutes operetur. Neque altitudo. Regni cælorum vel. sapientia. Neque profundum. Neque profunditas sientiæ, vel infernus.
We reduce all these tribulations to nothing on account of Him who so greatly loved us, that He died for us: and when we die for His name, then most of all do we triumph. 'For I am sure that neither death, nor life.' I am sure: because neither if anyone threaten me with death, nor if he promise me eternal life. 'Nor angels.' Not even if he say himself an angel sent from God: as he himself says to the Galatians. 'Nor principalities, nor things present.' Not even if he confer honour in the present. 'Nor things to come.' Nor if he promise present goods, and in the future glory. 'Nor might.' Not even if he work mighty deeds. 'Nor height.' Of the kingdom of heaven or of wisdom. 'Nor depth.' Nor the depth of knowledge, or hell.
我們因那如此深愛我們、甚至為我們死的主,將這一切患難看為無有:當我們為祂的名而死時,我們就最為得勝。「因為我深信無論是死,是生。」我深信:因為即或有人以死威嚇我,或以永生應許我。「是天使。」即或有人自稱是神所差來的天使:正如他自己對加拉太人所說的。「是掌權的,是有能的。」即或在今世賜下尊榮。「是將來的事。」也不論它應許今世的美物並將來的榮耀。「是能力。」即或行大能的作為。「是高處的。」無論是天國的高處或智慧的高處。「是深處的。」無論是知識的深處,或是陰間。
1:232
Neque creatura alia poterit nos separare. Omnem pene Creaturam nominavit, et non fnit his contentus, et addidit: Etiamsi sit alia creatura, non poterit nos separare a charitate Christi. Unde considerandum ua fidecrediderit Cbrislo..4 charitate Dei quæ est in Christo Jesu Domino. nostro. Cbaritas Christi nnn in hoc tantum constat, si quis dicat eum se diligetc, sed etiam quæcunque sanctis ejus fiunt, sibi fleri ipse testatur, dicens: Qui vos recipit, me recipit, etc. Et Joannes ait: Si fratrem tuum, quem vides, non dili. gis, Dominum, quem non vides, quomodo potes diligere Imo dilectionem Dei in fratribus voluit ostendi. Quoniam, inquit, Deus dilectio est, et cætera. Et Dominus:
'Nor any other creature shall be able to separate us.' He named almost every creature, and was not content with these, and added: Even if there be any other creature, it shall not be able to separate us from the love of Christ. Whence it must be considered with what faith one has believed in Christ. 'From the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.' The love of Christ does not consist in this alone, if one says that he loves Him, but also in that whatever is done to His saints, He Himself testifies is done to Himself, saying: 'He that receiveth you, receiveth me,' etc. And John says: 'If thou lovest not thy brother whom thou seest, how canst thou love the Lord whom thou seest not?' Nay, He willed that the love of God be shown in the brethren. 'For God,' he says, 'is love,' and the rest. And the Lord:
「是別的受造之物,都不能叫我們與神的愛隔絕。」他幾乎列舉了一切受造之物,仍不以此為足,又補充說:即或有別的受造之物,也不能叫我們與基督的愛隔絕。因此當思想人是以何等的信心信了基督。「這愛是在我們的主基督耶穌裡的。」基督的愛不僅在於一人口稱愛祂,也在於:凡向祂聖徒所行的,祂親自見證是向祂自己所行的,說:「人接待你們,就是接待我」等等。約翰也說:「人若不愛他所看見的弟兄,怎能愛他所未曾看見的主呢?」祂反倒願神的愛在弟兄身上顯明出來。他說:「因為神就是愛」等等。主也說:
1:233
In hoc, ait, cognoscetur, quia discipuli mei estis, si vos invicem dilexeritis. Si diligitis me, mandata mea servate. Et: Qui audit verba mea, et facit ea, hie est qui me diligit. CAP. IX. Veritatem dico. Quidam dicunt, qiod rem incredibilemdicturus, id est, quod se vellet esse apathema a Christo pro Israel, primum quadam testatione satisfaciat. Sa t isfacitJudæis se illos non odisse, sed eorum causa plurimum contristari quod Christo credere nolent, qui eis fuerit promissus. In Christo non mentior. Quicunque ergo baptixatus est, aut veritatem dicit, aut mendacium, quid quidfacit, in Christo facit, cujus est membrum. Et quicunque in baptismo peccat, in Christo peccat, sicut ait:
'In this,' He says, 'shall it be known that you are my disciples, if you love one another.' 'If you love me, keep my commandments.' And: 'He who heareth my words and doeth them, he it is that loveth me.' CHAPTER IX. 'I speak the truth.' Some say that, being about to say an incredible thing—namely, that he would wish to be anathema from Christ for Israel's sake—he first satisfies them with a certain attestation. He satisfies the Jews that he does not hate them, but is exceedingly grieved on their account, because they refuse to believe in Christ, who had been promised to them. 'In Christ I lie not.' Whoever therefore has been baptized, whether he speaks truth or falsehood, whatever he does, he does it in Christ, of whom he is a member. And whoever sins in baptism, sins in Christ, as he says:
祂說:「你們若彼此相愛,眾人因此就認出你們是我的門徒了。」「你們若愛我,就必遵守我的命令。」又說:「有了我的話又遵守的,這人就是愛我的。」第九章。「我在基督裡說真話。」有人說,他將要說一件難以置信的事——就是他情願為以色列的緣故與基督分離、受咒詛——所以他先用某種鄭重的聲明使他們信服。他向猶太人表明他並不恨他們,反倒為他們的緣故大大憂愁,因為他們不肯信那應許給他們的基督。「我在基督裡不撒謊。」所以凡受了洗的人,無論他說真話或謊言,凡他所行的,都是在基督裡行的,因他是基督的肢體。凡在洗禮中犯罪的,就是在基督裡犯罪,正如他所說:
1:234
Sic autem peccantes in fratres, et percutientes conscientias eorum i nfirmas, in Christo peccatis. testimonium mihi perhibente conscientia mea. Ille verum loquitur, cujus conscientia testimonium perhibet, et non illum arguit in mendacio. In Spiritu sancto. Non ficto. Quoniam tristitia est mihi magna, et continuus dolor cordi meo. Eo quod viderim eos non credere Deo. Optabam ego ipse anthemaesse a Christo pro fratribus meis, qui sunt cognati mei secundum carnem. Optabam aliquando, non nunc optarem. Sciebam enim quod ipsorum erant omnia, sed cum cognovi veritatem, conversus sum qui tam infidelis fui, et illi non convertuntur.
'Thus sinning against the brethren, and wounding their weak consciences, you sin against Christ.' 'My conscience bearing me witness.' He speaks truly whose conscience bears witness, and does not convict him of a lie. 'In the Holy Spirit.' Not feignedly. 'That I have great sadness, and continual sorrow in my heart.' Because I have seen them not believing in God. 'For I myself wished to be anathema from Christ for my brethren, who are my kinsmen according to the flesh.' I wished it once, not now would I wish it. For I knew that all things were theirs; but when I came to know the truth, I was converted—I who was so faithless—and they are not converted.
「你們這樣得罪弟兄們,傷了他們軟弱的良心,就是得罪基督。」「有我良心被聖靈感動,給我作見證。」凡良心作見證、不指控他說謊的,他就說的是真話。「在聖靈裡。」不是假裝的。「我是大有憂愁,心裡時常傷痛。」因為我看見他們不信神。「為我弟兄、我骨肉之親,就是自己被咒詛,與基督分離,我也願意。」我曾經如此願意,如今卻不再願意。因為我曾知道萬事本都屬他們的;但當我認識了真理,我這曾如此不信的人便回轉了,他們卻不回轉。
1:235
Qui sunt Israelitæ, quorum adopiio est filiorum, et gloria, et testamenta, et legislatio, et obsequium, et promissa. Refert et quid dimiscrit, ut co. gnoscas quas vis sit quæ cum potuit ab illis separare. Quorum patres. Abraham, Isaac, et Jacob. Et ex quibus Chris us secundum carnem: qui est super omnia Deus. Cuntra Arianum, Manichæum, et Photinum, sed et contra Nestorium, qui negat secundum carnem Dominum Christum. Benedictus in sæcula. Amen. Et. Thomas ait, Deus meus, et Dominus meus, qu d ille confirmat dicens: Quia vidisti, ideo credidisti. Non autem quod exciderit verbum Dei.
'Who are Israelites, to whom belongeth the adoption of sons, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service, and the promises.' He recounts also what he has renounced, that you may know how great a power that was which could separate him from them. 'Whose are the fathers': Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. 'And of whom is Christ according to the flesh, who is over all things, God.' Against the Arian, the Manichaean, and the Photinian, but also against Nestorius, who denies the Lord Christ according to the flesh. 'Blessed for ever. Amen.' And Thomas said, 'My God and my Lord,' which He confirms, saying: 'Because thou hast seen, therefore thou hast believed.' 'But not as though the word of God had failed.'
「他們是以色列人,那兒子的名分、榮耀、諸約、律法、禮儀、應許都是他們的。」他也述說他所捨棄的,好叫你知道那能使他與他們分離的,是何等大的力量。「列祖就是他們的」:亞伯拉罕、以撒、雅各。「按肉體說,基督也是從他們出來的,祂是在萬有之上,永遠可稱頌的神。」這是駁斥亞流派、摩尼派、弗提努派,也是駁斥聶斯多留,因他否認按肉體而言的主基督。「永遠可稱頌的。阿們。」多馬也說:「我的主,我的神!」主證實這話,說:「你因看見了我才信;」「這不是說神的話落了空。」
1:236
Quia superus dixerat, dolere se, quod genus Isracl suo vitio excluderetur a regno, quorum hæc pmnia fuerant, hic ostendit, illos, qui non credunt, non esse lilios Abrahae, ne omnibus Judæis prædicare putaretur et diceretur: Ergo Deus mentitus est Abrahæ? Absit. Hine incipit ratiocinari, cur alto et justo Dei judicio, repulsis Judacis gentes sunt intromissæ. Non enim omnes qui ex Israel, ii sunt filii Israel, neque qui semen sunt Abrahæ, omnes filii. Si non omnes, tamen aliquanti, qui inde electisunt, et facticredentes; si non omnes qui ex Israel. ii sunt Israel, ergo econtrario mulii qui non sunt ex Israel, ii sunt Israel. Dicit Salvator: Ecce vere Israelita, in quo dolus non est.
Because he had said above that he grieved that the race of Israel was excluded from the kingdom by its own fault—the race to whom all these things had belonged—here he shows that those who do not believe are not the sons of Abraham, lest he be thought to preach to all the Jews, and lest it be said: Then has God lied to Abraham? God forbid. Hence he begins to reason why, by the high and just judgment of God, the Jews being rejected, the Gentiles were let in. 'For all are not Israelites that are of Israel; neither are they all children who are the seed of Abraham.' If not all, yet some, who were chosen from thence, and made believers; if not all who are of Israel are Israel, then, on the contrary, many who are not of Israel are Israel. The Saviour says: 'Behold a true Israelite, in whom there is no guile.'
因為他在上面說過,他為以色列一族因自己的過犯被排除於國度之外而憂愁——這一切原都是屬他們的——所以他在此指明:那些不信的人不是亞伯拉罕的子孫,免得人以為他是向所有的猶太人傳講,也免得有人說:這樣,神豈是向亞伯拉罕撒了謊嗎?斷乎不是。於是他開始推論:為何按神崇高而公義的審判,猶太人被棄絕,外邦人被接納進來。「因為從以色列生的,不都是以色列人;也不因為是亞伯拉罕的後裔,就都作他的兒女。」縱使不是全部,仍有一些從中被揀選、被造成信徒的人;若非凡從以色列生的都是以色列,那麼反過來,許多不是從以色列生的倒是以色列。救主說:「看哪,這是個真以色列人,他心裡是沒有詭詐的。」
1:237
In quo ergo dolus est, non est vere Israelita. Sed in Isaac vocabitur tibi semen. In Isaac tunc etiam yocati sunt filii Abrahæ, non in Ismael, cum et ipse semen ejus esset. Id ut, non qui filii carni s, hi filii Dei, sed qui filii sunt repromissionis, æstimantur in semine: promissionis enim hoc verbum est. Et Ismael enim secundum consuetudinem natus est ex ancilla, Isaac vero plus habuit quam natura dabat, qui jam de senibus per repromissionem natus est. Ita et nunc Christianos promissio facit fllios Abrahæ, non caro et imitat o fidei ejus, per quam justificatus est, et meruit ut in semine ejus benedicantur omnes tribus terrae, non circumcisio.
In whom therefore there is guile, he is not a true Israelite. 'But in Isaac shall thy seed be called.' In Isaac then were also called the sons of Abraham, not in Ishmael, though he too was his seed. 'That is, they that are the children of the flesh are not the children of God; but they that are the children of the promise are counted for the seed'—for this is the word of promise. For Ishmael indeed was born according to the ordinary way, from a bondwoman; but Isaac had more than nature gave, since he was born of aged parents by promise. So also now the promise makes Christians the sons of Abraham—not the flesh—and the imitation of his faith, by which he was justified, and merited that in his seed all the tribes of the earth should be blessed—not circumcision.
所以,凡心裡有詭詐的,就不是真以色列人。「惟獨從以撒生的,才要稱為你的後裔。」那時亞伯拉罕的子孫是在以撒裡蒙召,不在以實瑪利裡,雖然他也是他的後裔。「這就是說,肉身所生的兒女不是神的兒女,惟獨那應許的兒女才算是後裔」——因為這是應許的話。因為以實瑪利實在是按著平常的方式,從使女所生的;但以撒卻有超乎本性所賜的,因他是憑應許從年邁的父母所生的。照樣,如今使基督徒作亞伯拉罕子孫的,乃是應許——不是肉身——並是效法他的信心,他因這信心稱義,也蒙恩得以在他的後裔中使地上萬族都得福——不是割禮。
1:238
Secundum hoc tempus veniam, et erit Saræ filius. Non Agar aneillæ, ut ostendat posteriorem populum esse repromissionis, sic et in Isaac. Non solum autem illa, sed et Rebecca. Non solum Ismael et Isaac, qui quamvis ex uno Abraham, tamen diversis matribus nati sunt, non fuere unum apud Dominum, sed etiam Jacob et Esau, qui ex uno sunt de Rebecca nati coneubitu, antequam nascerentur, apud Deum per ejus præscientiam sunt ad invicem separati, ut propositum Dei in præscientia sua maneret, qua repudiaturus erat Judæos incredulos, et gentibus sine ullis meritis erat misericordiam donaturus.
'At this time I will come, and Sarah shall have a son.' Not Hagar the bondwoman's—so as to show that the later people is of the promise, thus also in Isaac. 'And not only she, but Rebecca also.' Not only Ishmael and Isaac, who, though from the one Abraham, yet were born of different mothers, and were not one before the Lord; but also Jacob and Esau, who from one conjugal act were born of Rebecca, before they were born, by God's foreknowledge were separated from one another before God—so that the purpose of God might remain in His foreknowledge, by which He was about to reject the unbelieving Jews, and to grant mercy to the Gentiles without any merits.
「到明年這時候我要來,撒拉必生一個兒子。」不是使女夏甲所生的——好指明那後來的百姓是屬應許的,這樣也在以撒身上顯明。「不但如此,還有利百加。」不僅有以實瑪利和以撒,他們雖出於一個亞伯拉罕,卻是不同母親所生的,在主面前不算為一;而且還有雅各和以掃,他們是利百加一次同房從一人所生的,在他們還沒有生下來以先,藉神的預知就在神面前彼此分開了——好叫神的旨意在祂的預知裡存留,就是祂將要棄絕那不信的猶太人,並要不憑任何功德賜恩給外邦人。
1:239
Hoc to tum agit, ut ostendat, apud Deum praerogativam generis non valere, nec eum personam alicujus accipcre, quod his vult firmare exemplis, quae illi poterant in calumniam vertere, de his ipsis ostensurus, Deum quod velit facere, neminem ei posse contradicere, si voluit generi eorum aliquid proprie dare, et nunc quos voluit eligcre. Ex uno concubitu habensIsaac patris nostri. Cum enim nondum nati fuissent aut aliquid egissent boni aut mali, ut secundum electionem. propositum Dei maneret. Ex uno duos, quae intelligitur prima geminos edidisse, in eo quod quasi novum sibi aliquid accidisset, perterrita Dominum interrogat. Non ex operibus, sed ex vocante dictum est ei: Major serviet minori.
He does all this to show that with God the prerogative of race avails nothing, nor does He accept any man's person; which he wishes to confirm by these examples, which they could have turned into a calumny—about to show from these very things that God does what He wills, and no one can contradict Him, if He willed to give something specially to their race, and now to choose whomsoever He willed. 'Isaac our father, of one conjugal act.' 'For when they were not yet born, nor had done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand.' Of one, two—she who is understood first to have brought forth twins—in that, as though something new had happened to her, being terrified, she inquires of the Lord. 'Not of works, but of Him that calleth, it was said to her: The elder shall serve the younger.'
他行這一切,是要指明在神面前種族的特權毫無用處,神也不接納任何人的外貌;他要藉這些例證來證實這事,這些例證本可被他們轉化為誹謗——他要從這些事本身指明:神隨自己的意思行事,無人能與祂爭辯,倘若祂願意特別將某物賜給他們的種族,如今又願意揀選祂所願意的人。「以撒我們的祖宗,從一次同房。」「雙子還沒有生下來,善惡還沒有做出來,為要顯明神揀選人的旨意得以堅定。」從一人生二子——那被理解為頭一個生雙胞胎的婦人——因彷彿有新奇之事臨到她,她驚惶就求問主。「不在乎人的行為,乃在乎召人的主,就對她說:將來大的要服事小的。」
1:240
Non in Jacob et Esau est impletum, sed in figura dictum est populi Christiani, qui prælatus est seniori populo Judærum, sicut et Ephraim ct Man sses præfiguraverunt populum juniorem, id est Christianum, qui sunt mutatis manibus benedicti. Sicut scriptum est: Jacub dilexi, Esau autem odiohabui. Quod in Genesi d ctum est. Hoc Propheta non de ipsis, sed de filiis eorum refert impletum, quod testimonium Apostolus sumens curiositatem et calumniam repressit, asserens quod nulla sit iniquitas apud Deum, sed qui quid agit, aut misericorditer, aut judicialiter agit. Quid ergo dicemus ? Nunquid iniquitas apud Deum ? Absit.
It was fulfilled not in Jacob and Esau, but was said figuratively of the Christian people, which was preferred to the older people of the Jews, just as Ephraim and Manasseh also prefigured the younger people, that is, the Christian, who were blessed with hands crossed. As it is written: 'Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.' This was said in Genesis. This the Prophet relates as fulfilled not of themselves, but of their sons; which testimony the Apostle takes up, and represses curiosity and calumny, asserting that there is no iniquity with God, but whatever He does, He does either mercifully or judicially. 'What shall we say then? Is there injustice with God? God forbid.'
這話並非應驗在雅各和以掃身上,乃是預表基督徒的百姓而說的,這百姓被高舉過猶太的年長百姓,正如以法蓮和瑪拿西也預表那年幼的百姓,就是基督徒,他們是以交叉的手蒙福的。正如經上所記:「雅各是我所愛的,以掃是我所惡的。」這話是在創世記所說的。先知述說這話應驗,不是應驗在他們自己身上,乃是應驗在他們子孫身上;使徒引用這見證,抑制了好奇與誹謗,斷言在神並無不義,凡祂所行的,或是憑憐憫,或是憑審判而行。「這樣,我們可說甚麼呢?難道神有甚麼不公平嗎?斷乎沒有。」
1:241
Adhuc ratiocinatur, et proponit sibi quasi contradicentispersonam, et testimoniis superat, quod voluntati, Domini nemo valeat contrairr, ipso Moysi dicente: Miserchor cui misercor, id est: Si ego bonus, oculus tuus quare nequam ? Nunquid tibi tollo quod alii dono i In præscientia mea decrevi in olivam oleastrum inserere, quid ad te ? Moysi enim dicit: Miserebor cui misereor, et misericordiam præstabo cui miserebor. Quia cui miseretur Deus, vocat cum et inspirat ut credat, et cui misericors fuerit ut credat, misericordiam præstat, hoc est, Caciet eum misericordem, utetiam bene operetur. Unde evidenter. constat, omnia bona esse 9 Deo ipso, qui est Salvator omnium, maxime fidelium.
He reasons still further, and sets before himself, as it were, the person of one contradicting, and overcomes him by testimonies—that no one can go against the will of the Lord, Moses himself saying: 'I will have mercy on whom I have mercy'; that is: If I am good, why is thy eye evil? Do I take away from thee what I give to another? In My foreknowledge I have decreed to graft the wild olive into the olive tree; what is that to thee? For He says to Moses: 'I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will show mercy to whom I will be merciful.' For on whom God has mercy, He calls him and inspires him to believe; and to whom He is merciful that he may believe, He grants mercy—that is, He makes him merciful, that he may also do good works. Whence it evidently stands that all good things are from God Himself, who is 'the Saviour of all, especially of the faithful.'
他進一步推論,並在自己面前擺出一個彷彿反駁者的角色,用見證勝過他——就是無人能違抗主的旨意,摩西自己說:「我要憐憫誰,就憐憫誰」;就是說:我若是善的,你的眼為何是惡的呢?我豈把賜給別人的從你奪去嗎?在我的預知裡我已定意要將野橄欖接在橄欖樹上,這與你何干?因為祂對摩西說:「我要憐憫誰,就憐憫誰,我要恩待誰,就恩待誰。」因為神憐憫誰,就召他,感動他去信;祂憐憫誰,使他能信,就賜給他憐憫——就是說,使他成為有憐憫的,好叫他也行善。因此顯然可見,一切美善都是出於神自己,祂是「萬人的救主,更是信徒的救主」。
1:242
Sed dicit aliquis:Quare illum sic, pt alium non sic, et cur non omnes æqualiter ? Nunquid personarum est acceptor Deus? Acceptio personarum ibi recte dicitur, ubi ille qui judicat, relinquens causæ meritum de qua judicat, alteri contra alierum suffragatur, qui invenit aliquid in persona quod honore vel misericordia sit dignum. Si autem quispiam duos habeat debitores, et alteri velit debitum dimittere, et alterum exigere, cui vult donat, sed neminem fraudat, nec acceptio personarum dicenda est, quando iniquitas nulla est.
But someone says: Why this one thus, and another not thus, and why not all equally? Is God then a respecter of persons? Respect of persons is rightly said to exist where he who judges, abandoning the merit of the cause about which he judges, favours one against another, because he finds something in the person which is worthy of honour or of mercy. But if anyone have two debtors, and wish to remit the debt to the one and to exact it from the other, he gives to whom he wills, but defrauds no one, nor is it to be called respect of persons, when there is no iniquity.
但有人說:為何這人如此,那人卻不如此,又為何不都一律相同呢?這樣,神豈是以貌取人嗎?以貌取人乃是這樣說的:那審判的人,撇開他所審判之案件的是非,偏袒一方而虧待另一方,因他在人的外貌上找出某種配得尊榮或憐憫的東西。但若有人有兩個欠債的,願意免了這一個的債,卻向那一個追討,他隨己意賜恩,卻不虧負任何人,這也不可稱為以貌取人,因為其中並無不義。
1:243
Alioquin eis qui parum intelligunt, potest acceptio personrum videri, ubi vineæ dominus operariis, qui una bura lIlius opus fecerunt, tantum dedit quantum illis qui pertulerunt pondus diei et æstus, æquales faciens in mercede, quorum tam magna distantia fuerat in labore. Sed quid respondit de hac velut acceptione personarum murmurantibus? Amice, non facio libi injuriam, etc. Nempe hicc tota justitia est, boc volo Ubi reddi, huic donavi, neque tibi aliquid abstuli, aut quod debebam vel minui, vel negavi. An non Jicet mihi quod volo facere? etc. Sicut ergo bie nulla est acceptio personarum, quia sic alius gratis hanoratur, ut alius debito non fraudelur:
Otherwise, to those who understand little, respect of persons might seem to exist, where the lord of the vineyard gave to the workmen who had done one hour's work of his as much as to those who had borne the burden of the day and the heat, making them equal in wages, whose distance in labour had been so great. But what did he answer to those who murmured at this as though it were respect of persons? 'Friend, I do thee no wrong,' etc. Surely here is complete justice: this I wish to render, to this one I gave freely, nor did I take anything from thee, or diminish, or deny what I owed. 'Is it not lawful for me to do what I will?' etc. As therefore here there is no respect of persons, because one is thus freely honoured, so that another is not defrauded of his due:
不然,在那些領悟膚淺的人看來,以貌取人似乎確實存在,就是葡萄園的主人給那只作了他一個鐘頭工的人,與那些整天勞苦受熱的人一樣多的工錢,在工價上使他們相等,而他們在勞苦上的差距本是那麼大。但他對那些以此為以貌取人而發怨言的人怎樣回答呢?「朋友,我不虧負你」等等。這裡確實是完全的公義:這是我願意付的,這個我白白賜給了,我也沒有從你奪去甚麼,或減少或拒絕我所欠的。「我的東西難道不可隨我的意思用嗎?」等等。所以正如這裡並無以貌取人,因為一人如此白白得尊榮,卻不叫另一人被虧負當得的:
1:244
sic cum secundum propositum Dei vocatur alius et alius non vocatur; vocato datur gratuitum bonum, cujus boni est vocatiipsa principium; non vocato redditur debitum malum, qu a omnes rei sunt per unum, per quem peccatum intravit in mundum. Igitur non volentis neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei. Concludit disputationem, et objicit testimonia de Pharaone, ut Dei judicia contremiscamus potius quam discutiamus, quia plefumque sunt occulta, nunquam tamen sunt injusta, quia verum est quod et currentium cursum ipse dirigit, et sine illius gratia nullius cursus suum sortiatur effectum, sicut dicit Ecclesiastes: Nun est velocium cursus, nec fortium prælium; et David:
so, when according to the purpose of God one is called and another is not called, to the one who is called a gratuitous good is given—of which good the calling itself is the beginning; to the one who is not called, the due evil is rendered, since all are guilty through the one through whom sin entered into the world. 'Therefore it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.' He concludes the disputation, and brings forward testimonies about Pharaoh, that we may tremble at God's judgments rather than discuss them, because for the most part they are hidden, yet never are they unjust; for it is true that He Himself directs the course of those who run, and that without His grace no one's running obtains its own effect, as Ecclesiastes says: 'The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong'; and David:
照樣,當照神的旨意一人蒙召而另一人不蒙召時,那蒙召的就得著白白的美善——這美善的開端就是蒙召本身;那不蒙召的則得所當得的惡,因為藉那使罪入世界的一人,眾人都是有罪的。「據此看來,這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神。」他總結了辯論,並提出關於法老的見證,好叫我們在神的審判前戰兢,而非議論它們,因為它們大多是隱藏的,卻從不是不公義的;因為那奔跑之人的路程是祂親自引導的,這是真確的,若沒有祂的恩典,無人的奔跑能得著自己的功效,正如傳道書所說:「快跑的未必能贏,力戰的未必得勝」;大衛也說:
1:245
Nisi Dominus ædificarit domum, in vanum labora. runt, qui ædiicant eam. Ipsius ergo auxilium implorandum est, qui operatur omnia in omnibus. Debet ergo currere Christianus, et nunquam præsumere de suis viribus, currere debet et Dei praecepta implere, sed arrogare sibi nihil debet, secundum illud: Qui gloriatur, in Domino gloriemur. Hoc contra illos qui de suis meritis ac viribus præsumebant. Nam et ipse currebat, quando est ventus ire Bithyniam, sicut in Act bus apostolorum legimus. Credo quia inanis ejus cursuserat futurus, sed illuc a Spiritu sancto direetus est, ubi prædicatio ejus proficeret. Nam et David clamabat ad Dominum: Gressus meos dirige secundum eloquium tuum.
'Unless the Lord build the house, they labour in vain that build it.' His help therefore must be implored, who 'worketh all in all.' The Christian ought therefore to run, and never to presume upon his own strength; he ought to run and to fulfil God's precepts, but ought to arrogate nothing to himself, according to that word: 'He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.' This is against those who presumed upon their own merits and strength. For he himself was running, when he wished to go into Bithynia, as we read in the Acts of the Apostles. I believe that his course there was going to be in vain, but he was directed thither by the Holy Spirit, where his preaching would profit. For David also cried out to the Lord: 'Direct my steps according to thy word.'
「若不是耶和華建造房屋,建造的人就枉然勞力。」所以必須祈求那「在眾人裡面運行一切」之主的幫助。因此基督徒應當奔跑,卻絕不可倚仗自己的力量;他應當奔跑並遵守神的命令,卻不可將任何事歸功於自己,正如那話所說:「誇口的,當指著主誇口。」這是駁斥那些倚仗自己功德與力量的人。因為他自己也曾奔跑,當他想要往庇推尼去的時候,正如我們在使徒行傳所讀的。我相信他在那裡的路程本要枉然,但他被聖靈引到那能使他傳道有果效的地方去。因為大衛也曾向主呼求:「求你照你的話使我腳步穩當。」
1:246
Sine dubio inanis est curiUS noster, nisi gressus nostri a Domino dirigantur. Nam et equus potest currere, sed si non habeat rectorem, infrenis et præceps prævolitat, et rectum iter. non ambulat. Ita et nos sine Deo ct gratia ejus. Quis autem hominum habet potestatem tali visu attingere mentem suam, qua ejus voluntas moveatur ad fidem? Quis autem an moamplecthur, quod eum non delectat? Aut quis habet iN potestate, ut ei vel occurrat, quod eum delectare possit, vel delectet cum occurrerit? Cum ergo ea nosdelectant, quibus proficiamus, a Deo inspiratur hoc, et gratia Dei præbetur hoc, non nutu nostro, vel industria, aut operum meritis comparatur, quia ut sit motu?
Without doubt our running is in vain, unless our steps be directed by the Lord. For a horse too can run, but if it have no rider, unbridled and headlong it dashes forward, and does not walk the right path. So too are we without God and His grace. But what man has power to touch his mind with such vision that his will may be moved to faith? And who embraces that in which he takes no delight? Or who has it in his power that either that which can delight him should meet him, or that it should delight him when it has met him? When therefore those things delight us by which we make progress, this is inspired by God, and this grace of God is bestowed—not by our nod, or industry, or the merits of works is it obtained; because in order that there be movement
毫無疑問,我們的奔跑是枉然的,除非我們的腳步被主引導。因為馬也能奔跑,但若沒有騎士,它就脫韁地向前狂奔,不走正路。我們若沒有神和祂的恩典,也是如此。但哪個人有能力以那樣的異象觸動自己的心思,使自己的意志被動而歸信呢?誰能擁抱那使他毫不喜悅的事呢?又有誰能自己掌控:或使那能使他喜悅的事臨到他,或當它臨到時使他喜悅呢?所以,當那些使我們得長進的事使我們喜悅時,這是神所感動的,這神的恩典是所賜的——不是憑我們的頷首、勤勉或行為的功德所得的;因為要使意志有所動:
1:247
voluntatis, ut sit industria studii, ut sint opera charitate ferventa,ille tribuit, ille largitur. Petere enim jubemur, ut accipiamus, et quærere, ut inveniamus, pulsare, ut ape riatur nobis. Nonne aliquando ipsa oratio nostra sic tepida est, vel potius frigida, ct pene nulla, imo omnino interdum ita nulla, ut neque hoc in nobis cum dolore advertamus, quia si vel hoc dolemus, jam oramus? Quid aliud ostenditur nobis, nisi quia et petere, et quaerere, et pulsare ille concedit, qui hæc ut faciamus jubet ? Igitur non volentis, nec currentis, sed miserentis est Dei. Quandoquidem nec velle, nec currere, nisi eo movente atque excitante poterimus. Dicit enim Scriptura Pharaoni:
of the will, that there be industry of zeal, that there be works fervent with charity—He bestows it, He grants it freely. For we are commanded to ask, that we may receive, and to seek, that we may find, to knock, that it may be opened to us. Is not our very prayer sometimes so lukewarm, or rather cold, and almost nothing—nay, sometimes altogether so utterly nothing—that we do not even notice this in ourselves with grief? for if we even grieve at this, we are already praying. What else is shown to us, except that both to ask, and to seek, and to knock, He grants, who commands that we do these things? 'Therefore it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.' Since we can neither will nor run, unless He move and rouse us. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh:
使熱心有所勤勉,使行為因愛而火熱——這都是祂所賜的,祂白白施予的。因為我們奉命祈求,好叫我們得著;尋找,好叫我們尋見;叩門,好叫門為我們開。我們的禱告豈不是有時如此不冷不熱,甚或冰冷,幾近於無——不,有時竟全然如此空無,以致我們連自己這光景都不憂傷地察覺出來?因為我們若為此憂傷,就已經是在禱告了。這向我們顯明了甚麼呢?無非是:那吩咐我們去祈求、尋找、叩門的主,也賜下我們去行這些事的能力。「據此看來,這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神。」因為我們若沒有祂的推動與激勵,就既不能定意,也不能奔跑。因為經上對法老說:
1:248
Quia in hoc ipsum excitavi te ut ostendam in te virtutem meam, et nt nnnuntietur nomen meum in universa terra. Unusquisque modo et fine peccatorumcompleto punitur. Aliquoties etiam in præsenti, sicut Sodomitæ et Gomorrhæi. Pharao ergo jam excesserat modum, et quoniam dignus erat perditione, vuluit Deus illius exemplo omnibus timorem incutere, et ut agnosceret populus ejus, qui exiturus erat de Ægypto, virtutem ipsius et justitiam, ne ipsi simiiiter peccarent, aut timerent adversarios suos, voluit eos tali ultione non solum ab imminenti periculo liberare, sed etiam ad cavendum iniquitatem in posterum terrore suae potentiæ præmunire.
'For this very purpose have I raised thee up, that I may show in thee my power, and that my name may be declared throughout all the earth.' Each one is punished according to the measure and end of his sins being completed. Sometimes even in the present, as the Sodomites and the men of Gomorrah. Pharaoh therefore had already exceeded the measure, and because he was worthy of destruction, God willed by his example to strike fear into all, and that His people, who were about to go out of Egypt, might acknowledge His power and justice, lest they should sin likewise, or fear their adversaries; He willed by such retribution not only to free them from the imminent peril, but also to fortify them beforehand, by the terror of His power, against committing iniquity in time to come.
「我將你興起來,特要在你身上彰顯我的權能,並要使我的名傳遍天下。」各人是照他罪惡完滿的分量和終局受罰的。有時甚至在今世受罰,正如所多瑪人和蛾摩拉人。所以法老已經越過了那分量,因他配受滅亡,神就願藉他的例證使眾人畏懼,並使祂那將要出埃及的百姓認識祂的權能和公義,免得他們照樣犯罪,或懼怕自己的仇敵;祂願藉這樣的刑罰,不僅救他們脫離眼前的危險,更藉祂權能的可畏,預先堅固他們,防備他們日後行不義。
1:249
De Pharaone et sic intelligi potest, ut dicatur per Dei misericordiam induratus, quoniam quando Moyse orante cessavit plaga, ille indurabatur, et quamvis sciret eum ita esse induralum ut non posset converti, tamen bonitatem suam ostendit. Nam quod dixit, Excitavi: id est, prodidi, non feci: quomodo si aliquis duo vasa plena, unum cum balsamo, et alterum cum stercore, venllet, odorem sive fetorem prodit, non generat. Ergo cujus vult miseretur, ei quem vult indurat. Miseretur magna. bonitate, et, ohdurat nulla iniquitate: miseretur bona tribuendo, obdurat digna retribuendo: tanquam si diceret:
Concerning Pharaoh it can also be understood thus, that he is said to have been hardened through God's mercy, since when the plague ceased at Moses' prayer, he was hardened; and although He knew him to be so hardened that he could not be converted, yet He showed His goodness. For as to what He said, 'I have raised up,' that is, 'I have brought forth,' not 'I have made': just as if someone should carry two full vessels, one with balsam and the other with dung, he brings forth the fragrance or the stench, he does not generate it. 'Therefore on whom He wills He has mercy, and whom He wills He hardens.' He has mercy of His great goodness, and He hardens by no iniquity: He has mercy by bestowing good, He hardens by rendering what is deserved—as though He said:
關於法老也可如此理解,即說他是藉神的憐憫剛硬的,因為當災殃因摩西禱告而止息時,他就剛硬起來;雖然神知道他剛硬到不能回轉,祂仍顯明祂的良善。因為祂所說的「我興起了」,就是「我使之顯出來」,不是「我造成了」:正如有人若搬運兩個滿的器皿,一個盛香膏,另一個盛糞,他只是使那香氣或臭氣顯出來,並非生出它。「這樣看來,神要憐憫誰,就憐憫誰;要叫誰剛硬,就叫誰剛硬。」祂憑祂的大恩憐憫人,卻不憑任何不義叫人剛硬:祂憑賜下美善而憐憫,憑報應所當得的而叫人剛硬——彷彿祂說:
1:250
Ergo sic intelligitis, si cui vult miseretur, et quem vult indurat, sequitur intellectum vestrum, ut dicatis 1 Quid adhuc redarguimur ? quod vult ipse, hoc facimus. Sensit Apostolus quid moveret carnalem intellectum eorum, et sibi verba contradicentis, quæ apostoliea auctoritate coerceret, opposuit. Ait enim: Dicis itaque mihi: Quid adhuc conqueritur? [Infra in eodem texit quæritur.] nam voluntati ejus quis resilit ? Respondit que ista dicenti: O homo, tu quis ea, qui respondeas Deo ? Nunquid dicit figmentum ei, qui se finxit, quare me fecisti sic? Deindc secutus tam magnum abditumque secretum, quantum aperiendum esset hominibus judicavit, et aperuit dicens:
'If then you understand it thus, that He has mercy on whom He wills, and hardens whom He wills, your understanding follows, so that you say: Why then does He yet find fault? For what He wills, that we do.' The Apostle perceived what would move their carnal understanding, and set against himself the words of one contradicting, which he might restrain by apostolic authority. For he says: 'You will say therefore to me: Why then does He still complain?' [Below in the same passage it is read 'find fault.'] 'For who resists His will?' And he answered to the one saying these things: 'O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Does the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?' Then, having pursued so great and hidden a secret, he judged how much of it ought to be opened to men, and opened it, saying:
「你們若如此理解,就是祂要憐憫誰就憐憫誰,要叫誰剛硬就叫誰剛硬,你們的領悟就會接著說:這樣,祂為甚麼還指責人呢?因為祂所願意的,我們就照著行。」使徒察覺了甚麼會攪動他們屬肉體的領悟,就把一個反駁者的話擺在自己面前,好用使徒的權柄來抑制它。因為他說:「這樣,你必對我說:祂為甚麼還指責人呢?」〔下文同段作「找過失」。〕「有誰抗拒祂的旨意呢?」他就回答那說這些話的人:「你這個人哪,你是誰,竟敢向神強嘴呢?受造之物豈能對造他的說:你為甚麼這樣造我呢?」然後,他既追究了如此偉大而隱藏的奧祕,就判斷當向人揭示多少,於是揭示說:
1:251
Si autem volens De., ostendere iram, et demonstrare potentiam suam, sustinuit in multa potientia vasa iræ, quæ perfecta sunt in perditone, ut ostenderet divitias gloriæ suæ in vasa misericondiæ Hoc est gratiæ Dei non solum adjutorium, verum etiam documentum. Adjutorium scilicet in vasis misericordiæ; in vasis autem irædocumentum. In eis enim ostendliram, et demonstrat potentiam suam, quia tam potens est bonitas ut bene utatur etiam malis, et in eis Dotas faciat divitias gloriae suae in vasa mesiricordiæ:quoniam quod ab iræ vasis ei git justitia punientis, hoc vasis misericordiæ dimittit gratia liberantis:
'But if God, willing to show His wrath and to make known His power, endured with much patience the vessels of wrath, which are fitted for destruction, that He might show the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy.' This is not only the aid of God's grace, but even its proof. The aid, namely, in the vessels of mercy; but in the vessels of wrath, the proof. For in them He shows His wrath and makes known His power, because His goodness is so powerful that it uses well even evil things, and in them makes known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy: since what the justice of the One punishing exacts from the vessels of wrath, this the grace of the One delivering remits to the vessels of mercy:
「倘若神要顯明祂的忿怒,彰顯祂的權能,就多多忍耐寬容那可怒、預備遭毀滅的器皿,又要將祂豐盛的榮耀彰顯在那蒙憐憫的器皿上。」這不僅是神恩典的幫助,更是其明證。幫助乃在蒙憐憫的器皿上;而明證則在可怒的器皿上。因為祂在他們身上顯明祂的忿怒,彰顯祂的權能,因祂的良善如此有能,甚至善用惡事,並在他們身上將祂豐盛的榮耀彰顯在蒙憐憫的器皿上:因為那施罰之主的公義從可怒的器皿所索取的,正是那施拯救之主的恩典向蒙憐憫的器皿所免除的:
1:252
nec beneficium quod nonnullis gratis tribuitur, appareret, nsi Deus aliis ex cadem massa pariter reis justo judicio condemnatis, quid utrisQue deberetur ostenderet. Audi etiam integram loci.istius interpretationem beatissimi Patris Augustini, nam de Pbaraone ita respondetur: Prioribus metitis, quibus afflixit in regno suo peregrinos, dignum,.Tectum cui obduraretur tor, ut nec manifestissimis signis jubentis Dei crederet: ex eadem ergo massa, id est, peccatorum, et vasa misericordiæ protulit, quibus subveniret, eum eum deprecarentur filii Israel, et vasa irae, quorum suppłicio illos erudiret, id est, Pharaonem et populum ejus:
nor would the benefit which is freely bestowed on some appear, unless God, others of the same mass being likewise condemned as guilty by just judgment, showed what was due to both. Hear also the entire interpretation of this passage by the most blessed Father Augustine; for concerning Pharaoh it is thus answered: By his former merits, whereby he afflicted the strangers in his kingdom, he was worthy—fitted for one whose heart should be hardened, so that he would not believe even the most manifest signs of God commanding: from the same mass, therefore, that is, of sinners, He brought forth both the vessels of mercy, whom He would succour when the children of Israel entreated Him, and the vessels of wrath, by whose punishment He would instruct them, that is, Pharaoh and his people:
那白白賜給某些人的恩惠也不能顯明出來,除非神藉公義的審判,將出於同一團的另一些人也一同定為有罪,好顯明二者各自當得的是甚麼。你也當聽那至福的教父奧古斯丁對這段經文的完整解釋;因為關於法老,他這樣回答:因他先前的行為,就是他在自己國中苦待寄居者,他是配的——配作一個心該剛硬的人,以致他連神吩咐時最明顯的神蹟也不信:所以神從同一團,就是罪人之團中,取出蒙憐憫的器皿,就是當以色列子民求告祂時祂所要拯救的,並取出可怒的器皿,就是祂要藉其刑罰教訓他們的,就是法老和他的百姓:
1:253
quia quamvis essent utrique peccatores, et propterea ad unam massam pertinerent; aliter tameu traclandi erant, qui uni Deo ingemuerant, ut, eis subveniret: aliter illi, bul quorum injustis oneribus gemuerant. Pertulit ergo in multa patientia vasa irae, quae perfecta sunt in perditionem. Et co ipso, quo ait: In multa patientia, satis significavit priora eorum peccata, in quibus eos perlulit, tum vindicare: quando de eorum vindicta subveniendum erat iis qui liberabantur: ut notas faceret divitias gloriæ suae in vasa misericordiae, quæ præparavit in gloria. Hic fortasse conturbatus ad illam quaestionem rediisti: Si cui vuJt miserctur, ct quem vult obdurat, quid adhuc conqueritu! ?
because although both were sinners, and on that account belonged to one mass, yet they were to be treated differently—those who had groaned to the one God, that He might succour them; differently those under whose unjust burdens they had groaned. He endured therefore 'with much patience the vessels of wrath, which are fitted for destruction.' And by the very fact that he says 'with much patience,' he sufficiently signified that He then avenged their former sins, in which He endured them: since from their vengeance there was to be succour for those who were being delivered: 'that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He hath prepared unto glory.' Here perhaps, disturbed, you have returned to that question: If He has mercy on whom He wills, and hardens whom He wills, why does He yet complain?
因為雖然二者都是罪人,也因此屬於同一團,卻要以不同的方式對待——那些向獨一之神歎息、求祂拯救的,是一種對待;那些在其不義重擔之下使人歎息的,是另一種對待。所以祂「多多忍耐寬容那可怒、預備遭毀滅的器皿」。單憑他所說的「多多忍耐」,他就充分表明:那時祂懲罰他們先前的罪,就是在這些罪中祂寬容了他們:因為從對他們的報應中,將有對那些被拯救者的救助:「又要將祂豐盛的榮耀彰顯在那蒙憐憫、早預備得榮耀的器皿上。」到這裡,你或許不安,又回到那問題:祂若要憐憫誰就憐憫誰,要叫誰剛硬就叫誰剛硬,祂為甚麼還指責人呢?
1:254
voluntati ejus quis resistit ? Prorsus ita est, vis non vis, cui vult miseretur, et quem vult obdurat. Sed velle Dei quis impius dicat injustum, cui etiam ipse Pharao clamat: Justus est Dens: ego autem et populus meus injusti, quia hæc voluntas Dei injusta esse non potest. Yenil enim de occultissimis meritis, quæ ipsos peccatores discernunL Nam cum propter generale peccatum unam massam fecerint, non tamen nulla est inter illos diversitas; quia sunt multi peccalores naturaliter moderate viventes, per quod quamvis nondum sint justificati, digni tamen efficiantur justificatione:
'Who resists His will?' Assuredly it is so: whether you will or will not, He has mercy on whom He wills, and hardens whom He wills. But what impious man would call the will of God unjust—to whom Pharaoh himself cries out: 'God is just: but I and my people are unjust,' because this will of God cannot be unjust. For it comes of the most hidden merits, which distinguish the sinners themselves. For although, on account of the general sin, they made up one mass, yet there is not no diversity among them; because there are many sinners naturally living with moderation, whereby, although they are not yet justified, they nevertheless are made worthy of justification:
「有誰抗拒祂的旨意呢?」確實是如此:無論你願意不願意,祂要憐憫誰就憐憫誰,要叫誰剛硬就叫誰剛硬。但哪個不敬虔的人會稱神的旨意為不義呢——連法老自己也向祂呼喊說:「神是公義的,我和我的百姓是邪惡的」,因為神這旨意不能是不義的。因為它出於那最隱密的功過,這功過將罪人彼此分別出來。因為雖然由於普遍的罪,他們構成了一團,他們之間卻並非全無分別;因為有許多罪人本性上生活有節制,藉此,他們雖尚未稱義,卻仍配得稱義:
1:255
et non præcedet in alijs peccaloribus propria vitio, uldigni sint obtunsione, haben:es eumdem apostolum alibi dicentem: Quoniam nonprobaverunt Deum habere in notitiam, dfdit illos Deus in reprobum sensum. Hoc est qupd ob. duravitcor Pharaoni. Quod autem illi non prubavc. runt Deum habere in notitiam, hoc est quod digni exstitcrunt dari in reprobum sensum: tamen verum est, quia non volentis, neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei, quia si pro co levioribus quisque peccatis, aut certe gravior.bus et multis, (amen magno gemitu et dolore panitendi misericordia Dei dignus fuerit, non ipsius est, qui si relinqueretur. interiret, sed miserentis Dei, qui ejus precibus doloribusque subvenit.
and it does not precede in other sinners that by their own vice they should be worthy of the hardening—we having the same Apostle saying elsewhere: 'Because they did not approve to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense.' This is what hardened Pharaoh's heart. But that they did not approve to have God in their knowledge—this is what made them worthy to be given up to a reprobate sense: yet it is true that it is 'not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy'; because if for that reason anyone shall have been, by lighter sins, or certainly by graver and many sins, yet with great groaning and grief of repenting, made worthy of God's mercy, it is not of himself—who, if he were forsaken, would perish—but of the merciful God, who succours his prayers and griefs.
並且,在別的罪人身上,並非先有這情形,即他們因自己的惡而配受剛硬——我們有這同一位使徒在別處說:「他們既然故意不認識神,神就任憑他們存邪僻的心。」這就是那使法老心剛硬的。至於他們故意不認識神,這就是那使他們配被交與邪僻之心的:然而這是真的,即這「不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神」;因為若有人因此緣故,或因較輕的罪,或確實因較重且多的罪,卻以極大的歎息和悔改的憂傷,配得神的憐憫,這不是出於他自己——他若被撇棄,就必滅亡——乃是出於那憐憫的神,就是那救助他禱告與憂傷的神。
1:256
Parum est cnim velle, quamvis etiam ut velimus voluntas a Domino praeparatur, tamen (ut dixi) parum est velle, nisi Dominus misereatur. Sed Deus non miseretur, qui ad pacem vocat, nisi voluntas jam quidem sanata præcesserit: quia pax hominibus bonae voluntatis. Et quomodo nec velle quisquam potest, nisi admonitus et vocatus, sive intrinsecus, ubi nullus hominum videt, sive extrinsecus per sermonem sonantem, aut per aliqua signa visibilia, efficitur ut etiam ipsum velle Deus operetur in nobis. Ad illam enim cœnam, quam Dominus dicit iD Evangelio præparatam, nec omnes qui vocati sunt vcnirc voluerunt, nequc illi qui venerunt, venire possent, nisi vocarenlur.
For it is a small thing to will, although even our willing is prepared by the Lord; yet (as I have said) it is a small thing to will, unless the Lord have mercy. But God, who calls to peace, does not have mercy, unless a will already indeed healed have gone before: because 'peace to men of good will.' And just as no one can even will, unless admonished and called—whether inwardly, where no man sees, or outwardly through the sounding word, or through certain visible signs—it comes to pass that God works in us even the very willing. For to that supper which the Lord in the Gospel says was prepared, not all who were called wished to come, nor could those who came have come, unless they were called.
因為單有意願乃是小事,雖然連我們的意願也是主所預備的;然而(如我所說)單有意願乃是小事,除非主施憐憫。但那召人得平安的神,除非那已然得醫治的意願先行,否則祂不施憐憫:因為「平安歸與祂所喜悅的人」。並且,正如無人能有意願,除非受了勸戒與呼召——或在內心,那裡無人看見,或在外藉那發聲的言語,或藉某些看得見的記號——結果就是神在我們裡面連那意願本身也運行。因為主在福音書中所說那預備好的筵席,凡被召的並非都願意來,那些來的若不是蒙召,也不能來。
1:257
Nec illi debent sibi tribuere qui venerunt, quia vocati venerunt: Dee illi qui noluerunt venire, debent alteri tribuere, sed tantum sibi: quoniam ut venirent vocati erant in libera potestate: vocari ergo ante meritum voluntatem operatur: propterea et si quisquam tribuit quod venit vocatus, non sibi potest tribuere quod vocatus est. Qui autem vocatus n'n venit, sicut non habet meritum praemii, ut vocaretur,sic incidet in meritum supplicii, qui vocatus venire neglexit. Ita erunt illa duo: Misericordiam et judicium cantabo tibi, DoMine. Ad misericordiam pertinet vocatio, ad judicium pertinet beatitudo eorum qui venerunt vocati: et supplicium eorum qui venire noluerunt.
Nor ought those who came to attribute it to themselves, because they came called: nor ought those who refused to come to attribute it to another, but only to themselves: since, that they might come, they were called while in free power. To call, therefore, works the will before merit: therefore even if anyone attributes it to himself that he came when called, he cannot attribute to himself that he was called. But he who, called, did not come, as he has no merit of reward that he should be called, so he falls into the merit of punishment, who, called, neglected to come. Thus shall those two things be: 'Mercy and judgment I will sing to thee, O Lord.' To mercy belongs the calling; to judgment belongs the blessedness of those who came when called, and the punishment of those who refused to come.
那些來的人不該把這歸功於自己,因他們是蒙召而來的:那些不肯來的人也不該把這歸咎於別人,只該歸咎於自己:因為,為使他們能來,他們是在自由的權能中蒙召的。所以,呼召乃在功德之先運行意志:因此,即或有人把他蒙召而來歸功於自己,他也不能把他蒙召這事歸功於自己。但那蒙召卻不來的人,正如他沒有配得賞賜的功德以致蒙召,照樣他就落入受罰的份,因他蒙召卻疏忽不來。這樣,那兩件事就要成就:「主啊,我要向你歌唱慈愛和公平。」呼召屬乎慈愛;那蒙召而來之人的福樂,並那不肯來之人的刑罰,都屬乎公平。
1:258
Nunquid ergo latebat Pharaonem quantum boni consecuturæ illæ terræ per adventum Joseph fuerint? Illius ergo rei gestæ cognitio vocatio ejus fit, ut populum Israel misericorditcr tractans non esset ingratus. Quod autem huic vocationi obtemperare notuit, et exercuit crudelitatem in eis, quibus humanitas et misericordia debebatur; meruit pœnam, ut induraretur illi cor, et tantam cæcitatem mentis pateretur, ut tot et tantis tamque manifestis Dei signis non crederet, quo possit cjus supplicio sive obduration s, sive ultimæ visibilis submersionis erudiri populus, ut sibi afflictione illa [F. leg. afflictionem illam] et occultæ obtunsionis, et manifestæ submersionis inobedientiæ merito compararet.
Was it then hidden from Pharaoh how great a good those lands were going to obtain through the coming of Joseph? The knowledge of that deed done, therefore, becomes his calling, that, treating the people of Israel mercifully, he might not be ungrateful. But because he was unwilling to obey this calling, and exercised cruelty upon those to whom humanity and mercy were due, he merited the penalty, that his heart should be hardened, and that he should suffer so great a blindness of mind that he would not believe so many and so great and so manifest signs of God—whereby the people might be instructed, by his punishment whether of hardening or of final visible submersion, so that by that affliction, both of the hidden dulling and of the manifest submersion, he might procure it for himself by the just desert of his disobedience.
那麼,那些地土將要因約瑟的到來獲得何等的福祉,這事豈向法老隱藏了嗎?所以,認識那已行之事,就成了他的呼召,好叫他憐憫地對待以色列百姓,不至於忘恩負義。但因他不肯順從這呼召,反倒向那些理當得人道與憐憫的人施行殘忍,他就配受刑罰,使他的心剛硬,並使他遭受那樣大的心思昏蒙,以致他不信神那麼多、那麼大、那麼明顯的神蹟——好叫百姓藉他的刑罰,無論是剛硬的刑罰或最終看得見的沉沒的刑罰,得著教訓,以致他藉那災禍,就是隱密昏蒙與明顯沉沒兩者的災禍,因他悖逆的當得之報,為自己招來這一切。
1:259
Hæc autem vocatio, quae sive in singulis hominibus, sive in populis, atque in ipso humano genere per temporum apportunitates operatur, aliæ et profundæ ordinationis est: quo pertinet etiam illud: Inutero sanctificavi te: et cum esses in rcnibus patris tui, vidi te. Et, Jacob dilexi, Esau autem odio habui, eum dictum sit antequam nasceretur: nec comprehendi potest, nisi frte ab eis qui diligunt Dominum Deum suum ex toto corde, et ex tota anima,et ex tota mente sua, et proximum tanquam semetipsos.Tantai enim charitate fundati, possunt jam, si fortasse cum sanctis, comprehendere longitudinem, latitudinem et profundum.
Now this calling, which works its effect whether in individual men, or in whole peoples, and indeed in the very human race, according to the opportune moments of the times, belongs to another and more profound ordering; to which pertains also that word: 'In the womb I sanctified you; and while you were in the loins of your father, I saw you.' And, 'Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated,' though it was said before he was born. Nor can it be grasped, except perhaps by those who love the Lord their God with their whole heart, and with their whole soul, and with their whole mind, and their neighbour as themselves. For being grounded in so great a charity, they are able now, if perchance together with the saints, to comprehend the length, the breadth, and the depth.
如今這召喚,無論是在個別的人身上,或在萬民之中,甚而在整個人類身上,都按著時機的適宜而運作;這乃屬於另一層更深奧的安排。那話也屬於此:「我在母腹中已將你分別為聖;當你尚在你父的腰中時,我便看見了你。」又如:「雅各是我所愛的,以掃卻是我所惡的」,這話乃是在他未生之先便說了的。這奧祕無人能領會,唯有那些盡心、盡性、盡意愛主他們的神,並愛鄰舍如同自己的人,或可領悟。因為他們既在如此深厚的愛中扎根立基,如今便能夠,或許與眾聖徒一同,領會那長闊與深。
1:260
Illud tamen constantissima fide retinendum, neque quidquam Deum injuste facere, neque ullam esse naturam, quæ non Deo debeat id quod csl. Quia Deo debetur omne decus, et pulchritudo, et congruentia par ium: quam si penitus persecu us fueris, et usque ad omnes reliquias de rebus detraxeris, remanet ni. hi!. Cum ergo meritum peccando apliserimus, et si misericordia Dei remota, nihil aliud peccantibus nisi poena aeterna debeatur, quid sibi vu!t homo de massa perditionis natus, ut Deo respondeat, et dicat: Quare sic me fecisli 1 si vis ista Cognoscere, noli esse lutum, sed effic re filius Dei per illius misericordiam, qui dedit potestatem filios Dei fieri credentibus in nomine ejus.
Yet this must be held with the most steadfast faith: that God does nothing unjustly, and that there is no nature which does not owe to God that which it is. For to God is owed all comeliness, and beauty, and the fitting proportion of parts; and if you pursue this to the very end, and strip away from things all their remaining traces, nothing at all remains. Since therefore by sinning we have lost merit, and if the mercy of God be withdrawn, nothing else is owed to sinners save eternal punishment, what does a man born of the lump of perdition mean, when he answers back to God and says: 'Why have you made me thus?' If you wish to know these things, be not clay, but become a son of God through the mercy of him who gave power to become the sons of God to those who believe in his name.
然而這必須以最堅定的信德持守:神絕不行任何不義之事,也沒有任何本性不將其所是歸欠於神。因為一切端莊、美麗與各部分的和諧勻稱皆歸欠於神;你若徹底追究到底,將萬物殘餘的一切痕跡都剝除,便一無所存。既然我們藉犯罪失去了功德,倘若神的憐憫撤去,罪人所當得的無非是永刑,那麼一個從滅亡之團所生的人算得什麼,竟敢頂撞神說:「你為何這樣造我呢?」你若想明白這些事,就不要作泥土,倒要藉那賜權柄給凡信他名之人、使他們作神兒女者的憐憫,成為神的兒子。
1:261
Non autem quod tu cupis, antequam credunt, datur hominibus divina nosse cupientibus. Merces enim cognitions meritis redditur; credendo autem meritum comparatur. Ipsa autem gratia, quæ data est per fidem, nullis nostris meritis præcedentibus data es'. Quod enim meritum peccatoris et impii? Christus autem pro peccatoribus et pro impiis mortuus est, ut ad credendum non merito, sed gratia vocaremur, credendo autem etiam meritum collocaremus. Peccatorfs igitur credere jubentur et a peccatis credendo purgantur. Nesciunt enim quid recte vivendo visuri sint:
But that which you desire is not given to men who desire to know divine things before they believe. For the reward of knowledge is rendered to merits; but by believing merit is acquired. Yet grace itself, which is given through faith, is given with no merits of ours going before. For what merit has a sinner and an ungodly man? But Christ died for sinners and for the ungodly, so that we might be called to believe not by merit but by grace, and by believing might then lay up merit as well. Sinners therefore are commanded to believe, and by believing are cleansed from their sins. For they do not know what they shall see by living rightly:
但你所渴求的,卻不賜給那些在信之前便渴望認識神聖之事的人。因為知識的賞賜是按功德償還的;而功德乃是藉著相信獲得的。然而那藉信德所賜的恩典本身,卻是在我們毫無功德為先的情況下賜下的。因為罪人與不敬虔者有何功德可言呢?但基督卻為罪人、為不敬虔者死了,好叫我們蒙召去相信,不是憑功德,乃是憑恩典,而藉著相信我們才積蓄功德。所以罪人被吩咐去相信,並藉相信得以脫離罪的污穢。因為他們尚不知道正直生活將使他們看見什麼:
1:262
quapropter cum videre non possint, nisi recte vivant, nerecte vivere valeant, nisi credant, manifestum est a fide incipiendum, ut præcepta quibus credentes a sæculo hoc avertuntur, cnr mundum faciant, ubi videri Deus possit; tunc demum recte et non præpostere audies, si qua sunt de animarum occultissimis meritis et de gratia vel justitia secreta omnipotentis Dei. Fidem etiam, ut credas, ille dat, a quo est omne datum bonum; quid enim habes quod non accepisti? Dicis itaque mihi: Quid adhuc quæritur ? volunlali enim ejus quis resistit? Verum est quod non resistitur: quia ipsa voluntas Dei bona et justa esse a nullo dubitatur Christiano. 0 homo, tu quit es, qui respondeas Deo?
wherefore, since they cannot see unless they live rightly, nor can they live rightly unless they believe, it is manifest that one must begin from faith, so that the precepts by which believers are turned away from this world may make them clean, that God may there be seen; and then at last you will hear rightly, and not preposterously, whatever things there are concerning the most hidden merits of souls and concerning the secret grace or justice of almighty God. Faith too, that you may believe, he gives, from whom is every good gift; for what have you that you did not receive? You say to me therefore: 'Why is it still sought? for who resists his will?' It is true that he is not resisted; because the very will of God is doubted by no Christian to be good and just. O man, who are you, that you should answer back to God?
所以,既然他們若不正直生活便不能看見,若不相信便不能正直生活,可見人必須從信德起步,好叫那使信徒離棄今世的誡命潔淨他們,使神能在其中被看見;然後你才終能正確地、而非本末倒置地聽見,凡有關靈魂那最隱密的功德、以及全能之神那隱祕的恩典或公義的一切事。連信德也是那賜下各樣美善恩賜者所賜給你的,使你能信;因為你有什麼不是領受的呢?你於是對我說:「這樣還追究什麼呢?有誰能抗拒他的旨意呢?」他的旨意無人能抗拒,這是真的;因為神的旨意本是良善公義的,這是任何基督徒都不懷疑的。人哪,你是誰,竟敢向神頂嘴呢?
1:263
Et hoc contradicentis est, etiamsi sic esset, ut dicis, tu quis eras, qui responderes Deo?qni debes tacere, et quod tibi jubetur facere; si te bonum jubet facere, debes intelligere quia et ipse bonus est, cui malum non placet, et a quo tc prohibet. Nunquid dixit: 0 homo, falsum est quod dixisti? sed dixit: 0 homo, tu quis es, qui respondeas Deo ? et retiqua. Nunquid dicit figmentum ei qui se finxit: Quid me fecisti sic? Annon habet potestatem figulus luti? Non dicit, quia non potest, nec debet; vult nos sic mutos esse apud Dominum, sicut lutum ad figulum:
And this belongs to one who contradicts: even if it were so as you say, who were you, that you should answer back to God? you who ought to keep silence, and to do what is commanded you; if he commands you to do good, you ought to understand that he himself is also good, to whom evil is not pleasing, and from which he forbids you. Did he say: 'O man, what you said is false'? but he said: 'O man, who are you, that you should answer back to God?' and the rest. Does the thing formed say to him who formed it: 'Why have you made me thus?' Has not the potter power over the clay? He does not say that he cannot, nor ought not; he wills that we be as mute before the Lord, as the clay is toward the potter:
這乃屬於頂撞者的話:縱然真如你所說,你又是誰,竟敢向神頂嘴呢?你本該緘默,並行你所受吩咐的;他若吩咐你行善,你就當明白他自己也是良善的,他不喜悅惡,並禁止你行惡。他豈曾說:「人哪,你所說的是虛謊」?他乃是說:「人哪,你是誰,竟敢向神頂嘴呢?」等等。受造之物豈可對造它的說:「你為何這樣造我呢?」窯匠豈沒有權柄支配泥土麼?他並非說窯匠不能、或不該;他乃是願我們在主面前緘默無言,如同泥土在窯匠面前一般:
1:264
cum enim non intelligimus, non debemus mala sentire de Deo, scientes quod in Dco vitium cadere non potest, quia judicia ejus occula sunt, injusta non sunt. Ex eadem maia facere aliud quidem vas in honorem, aliud vero in contumeliam ? De illa massa dicit populi peccatoris, qua ex Adam omnes creati sumus. Quod si volens Deus ostendere iram, et notam facere potentiam suam. Voluntas Dei misericors est, et justa, ct non vult nisi quod bonum, pium et justum est. Sustinuit in multa patientia. Qui illum diu sustinuit blasphemantem, et populum suum duris operibus affligentem. Vasa iræ apta in interitum, ut ostenderet divitias gloriæ suæ.
for when we do not understand, we ought not to think evil of God, knowing that no fault can fall upon God, since his judgements are hidden, but are not unjust. Out of the same lump, to make one vessel indeed unto honour, but another unto dishonour? He speaks of that lump of the sinful people, from which as from Adam we were all created. But if God, willing to show his wrath and to make known his power. The will of God is merciful and just, and wills nothing save what is good, pious, and just. He endured with much patience. He who long endured that people blaspheming, and afflicting his own people with hard labours. The vessels of wrath fitted unto destruction, that he might show the riches of his glory.
因為當我們不明白時,就不當對神存邪念,要知道神絕不會有任何過失,因他的審判雖隱祕,卻並非不義。就是要從同一團泥中,造一個貴重的器皿,又造一個卑賤的器皿麼?他所說的乃是那犯罪之民的一團,我們眾人都是從中、如同從亞當被造出來的。但神既然要顯明他的忿怒,並彰顯他的權能。神的旨意是憐憫且公義的,除了良善、虔敬與公正的,別無所願。他就多多忍耐寬容。他長久忍耐那褻瀆的民,並用苦工苦害他自己的百姓。那可怒、預備遭毀滅的器皿,是要叫他彰顯他榮耀的豐富。
1:265
Implendo peccata vasa irx digna fuerant effecta, aptata a semctipsis in interitum, non solum per originale peccatum, sed per actuale. lra quippe non redditur, nisi dcbita, ne sit iniquitas apud Deum. Et hinc intelligunt vasa misericordiæ quam gratuita illis misericordia præbeatur, quod iræ vasis, cum quibus eis est perdilionis causa, et massa communis, ira debita et justa rependitur, et istis misericordia indebita condonatur. In vasa misericordiæ, quæ præparavit in gloriam, quos et vocavit. Quia ipse eis voluit misereri, et facere eos vasa misericordiæ de vasis iræ. N n solum ex Judæis. Si personaliter vocasset, solos Judæos vocasset;
By filling up their sins, they had been made worthy vessels of wrath, fitted by themselves unto destruction, not only through original sin, but through actual sin. For wrath is not rendered except as a debt, lest there be iniquity with God. And from this the vessels of mercy understand how freely mercy is bestowed upon them, in that to the vessels of wrath, with whom they share the same cause of perdition and the common lump, wrath is repaid as owed and just, while to these an undeserved mercy is granted. Upon the vessels of mercy, which he prepared unto glory, whom also he called. Because he himself willed to have mercy on them, and to make them vessels of mercy out of vessels of wrath. Not only of the Jews. If he had called them individually, he would have called the Jews alone;
他們藉著積滿自己的罪,已成了可怒的器皿,是自己使自己配得毀滅的,不僅藉著原罪,也藉著本罪。因為忿怒的償還無非是所當得的,免得神有不義。蒙憐憫的器皿由此便明白,憐憫是何等白白地賜給他們的,因為那可怒的器皿——與他們同有滅亡之因、同出一團——所得的是當得且公義的忿怒償還,而這些器皿所蒙的卻是不當得的憐憫。就是那蒙憐憫、預備得榮耀的器皿,也是他所召的。因為他自己願意憐憫他們,使他們從可怒的器皿變為蒙憐憫的器皿。不但是從猶太人中。他若按個人揀選,就只召猶太人了;
1:266
sed invenimus eum nec Judxis peccantibus pepercisse, nec gentes salvari prohibuisse. Sed etiam ecC gentibus, sicut Osee dicit, Quia et tunc Ægyptii aliquanti exierant cum illis. Vocavi non plebem meam, plebem meam, et non dileclam, dilectam. Per prophetam ostendit pradictum, gentes esse transituras ad Christum. Et non misericordiam consecutam, misericordiam consecutam. Et erit in loco, ubi dictum est eis: Non plebs mea vos: ibi vocabuntur filii Dei vivi. In tantum quo vult vocat, ut cliam gentes impias eligeret, et quae nunquam boni aliquid fuerant operatæ. Si enim merita eligeret, soIus Israel, qui semper Deo servivit, debuerat hoc me.
but we find that he neither spared the Jews when they sinned, nor forbade the Gentiles to be saved. But also from the Gentiles, as Hosea says. For even then a good number of Egyptians had gone out with them. 'I will call that which was not my people, my people; and her that was not beloved, beloved.' Through the prophet he shows it foretold, that the Gentiles would pass over to Christ. 'And her that had not obtained mercy, one that has obtained mercy.' 'And it shall be in the place where it was said to them, You are not my people: there they shall be called sons of the living God.' To such a degree does he call whom he wills, that he chose even the ungodly Gentiles, who had never wrought any good. For if he chose according to merits, Israel alone, who always served God, ought to have obtained this:
然而我們看見,他既不寬容犯罪的猶太人,也不禁止外邦人得救。而是也從外邦人中呼召,正如何西阿所說。因為當日也有相當數目的埃及人與他們一同出來。「那本不是我子民的,我要稱為我的子民;本非蒙愛的,我要稱為蒙愛的。」他藉先知顯明這預言,就是外邦人要歸向基督。「那未曾蒙憐憫的,也蒙了憐憫。」「將來在那裡,就是從前對他們說『你們不是我子民』的地方,他們必被稱為永生神的兒子。」他隨己意呼召的程度竟至如此,甚至揀選了那不敬虔、從未行過任何善事的外邦人。因為他若按功德揀選,那素來事奉神的以色列人就當獨得此福:
1:267
reri, sed omnes gratis salvat, et nullum meritis suis, quia sicut dicit: Omnia sub peccato inclusit, ut omnibus misereretur. Isaias autem clamat pro Israel: Si fuerit numerus filiorum Israel tanquam arena maris. Pro ipsis est, si credant, quod iliis comminatur. Beliquiæ salvæ fient. Judæorum autem paucitatem credituram ostendit Isaias, quae sunt vasa in honorem: nam reliqua multitudo vasa in contumeliam. Verbum consummans et brevians in æquitate. Secundum histo. nam sic intelligitur; sicut ego verbum abbrevio, et finio, sic illud cito Deus faciet. Secundum allegoriam autem, Novum Testamentum accipit verbum abbreviatum, quia omnia in eo breviter comprehensa sunt, ut est:
but he saves all freely, and none by their own merits, since, as he says: 'He has shut up all under sin, that he might have mercy upon all.' But Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: 'If the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea.' It is for them, if they believe, that which is threatened against them. 'A remnant shall be saved.' Isaiah shows that a small number of the Jews would believe, who are the vessels unto honour; for the remaining multitude are vessels unto dishonour. 'A word consummating and cutting short in equity.' According to the literal sense it is thus understood: as I shorten and finish the word, so God will do that thing swiftly. But according to the allegory, the New Testament receives the shortened word, because all things are briefly comprehended in it, as it is:
但他白白地拯救眾人,無人是憑自己功德得救的,正如他所說:「他將眾人都圈在罪中,特意要憐憫眾人。」以賽亞卻論到以色列人喊著說:「以色列人的數目雖如海沙。」若他們相信,那向他們發出的警告便對他們有益。「得救的不過是剩下的餘數。」以賽亞顯明只有少數猶太人要相信,這些便是貴重的器皿;其餘的眾人則是卑賤的器皿。「主要在公義中成全並速速施行他的話。」按字面意思是這樣理解的:正如我將話語縮短並完成,神也必如此速速成就那事。但按預表寓意,新約領受那被縮短的話語,因為萬事都簡要地包含在其中,正如:
1:268
Credo in Deum Patrem omnipotentem, et in Filium ejus Jesum Christum, ct n Spiritum sanctum, et reliqua quae sequuntur in symbolo. Vel illud: Quod vobis fieri nonvultis alii ne feceritis. Id est, ut com. pendio fidei, per gratiam salvos faciat credentes, non per innumeras observationes. quibus illa multitudo serviliter onerata premcbatur. Per gratiam quippe nobis verbum consummans ct brevians fecit super terram, dicens: Jugum meum suave est et onus meum leve. Vel illud: Diliges Deum et proximum; in his praecepti3 tota lex pendet el prophetæ. Quia verbum breviatum faciet Dominus super terram. Contraxit ct ab-. breviavit Dominus p pulum Israel. Et sicut prædixit Isaia:
'I believe in God the Father almighty, and in his Son Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Spirit,' and the rest that follows in the Creed. Or that: 'What you do not wish to be done to yourselves, do not do to others.' That is, so that by a compendium of faith, through grace, he may save the believers, not through countless observances by which that multitude was slavishly burdened and oppressed. For through grace he made for us a word consummating and cutting short upon the earth, saying: 'My yoke is easy and my burden is light.' Or that: 'You shall love God and your neighbour; on these precepts hang all the law and the prophets.' 'For the Lord will make a shortened word upon the earth.' 'The Lord has drawn together and cut short the people of Israel.' And as Isaiah foretold:
「我信全能的父神,並他的兒子我們的主耶穌基督,又信聖靈」,以及信經中隨後的其餘各句。或那話:「你們不願人加諸你們的,也不要加諸別人。」意思是,藉著信德的簡要提綱,透過恩典,他拯救那些相信的人,而非藉著那使那群眾如奴僕般被壓制的無數規條。因為他藉恩典在地上為我們造了一句成全並縮短的話語,說:「我的軛是容易的,我的擔子是輕省的。」或那話:「你要愛神和鄰舍;這兩條誡命是律法和先知一切道理的總綱。」「因為主必在地上成就那簡短的話語。」「主已將以色列的百姓收縮並縮短。」正如以賽亞所預言的:
1:269
Nisi Bominus Sabaoth reliquisset nobis semen, sicut Sodoma facti essemus et sicut Gomorrha similes fuissemus. Quia non est passus omnes perire cum impiis, sed inde vel paucos justos effecit, et semen Abrahae venit, qui salvaret quæ pericrant; nisi voluisset vel paucos salvare, omnes pariter perissemus, sed ut quod promiserat Abrahæ impleret. Cur autem isle accipiat ille non accipiat, cum ambo non mereantur accipere, ei quisquis acceperit indebite accipiat, vires suas metiantur, et fortiora se non scrutentur, sufticiat eis scire, quod non si! iniquitas apud Deum. Quid ergo dicemus, quod gentes, quæ non sectabantur justitiam, apprehenderunt justitiam?
'Unless the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we should have become as Sodom, and been made like unto Gomorrah.' Because he did not suffer all to perish with the ungodly, but from thence made at least a few righteous, and the seed of Abraham came, which should save those things that were perishing; unless he had willed to save even a few, we should all alike have perished, but that he might fulfil what he had promised to Abraham. But why this one receives and that one does not, since both do not merit to receive, and whoever receives, receives undeservedly, let them measure their own strength, and not search into things too strong for them; let it suffice them to know that there is no iniquity with God. What then shall we say, that the Gentiles, who did not follow after righteousness, laid hold on righteousness?
「若不是萬軍之主給我們存留餘種,我們早已成了所多瑪,變得如同蛾摩拉了。」因為他不容眾人與不敬虔者一同滅亡,乃是從中至少造出少數義人,且亞伯拉罕的後裔來了,要拯救那將亡之物;他若不曾願意連少數也拯救,我們就都一同滅亡了,然而這是要成就他向亞伯拉罕所應許的。至於為何這人領受而那人不領受,既然二人都不配領受,凡領受的也是不配而領受,那麼人當量度自己的力量,不要探究那過於自己的事;他們只要知道神並無不義,這便足夠了。這樣,我們可說什麼呢?那本不追求公義的外邦人反得了公義?
1:270
Si non ita est ut dicimus, quia non est volentis, neque currentis, quomodo gentes, quæ nunquam justitiam quæsierunt, invenerunt justitiam? rt Israel, qui semper justitiam sectatus est, in legem justitiae non potuit pervenire ? Respondit: Quia illi crediderunt, isti vero noluerunt, sed in operibus gloriati sunt, quæ nec custodierunt. Quid ergo dicimus contra hæc, quae nubis objici possunt, hoc est, quod gentes non sectantes apprehenderunt, Israel vero nou apprehendit? sed contremiscamus judicia Dei, quæ, ut dixi, occulta sunt: injusta autem nunquam sunt. Justitiam autem quæ ex fide est: Israel vero sectans legem juatitiæ, in legem justitiæ non pervenit.
If it is not as we say, namely that it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, how did the Gentiles, who never sought after righteousness, find righteousness? and Israel, who always followed after righteousness, could not attain to the law of righteousness? He answered: Because those believed, but these would not, but gloried in works which they did not even keep. What then do we say against these things which can be objected to us, that is, that the Gentiles, not following after, laid hold, but Israel did not lay hold? but let us tremble at the judgements of God, which, as I said, are hidden; yet are they never unjust. But righteousness which is of faith; but Israel, following after the law of righteousness, did not attain to the law of righteousness.
若非如我們所說的,就是這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,那麼那從未尋求公義的外邦人怎能尋見公義?而那素來追求公義的以色列人反不能達到公義的律法呢?他回答說:因為那些人相信了,這些人卻不肯信,反倒以他們自己都未遵守的行為誇口。那麼,對這些可向我們提出的反駁,我們可說什麼呢?就是那不追求的外邦人反得著了,而以色列人卻未得著?我們只當在神的審判前戰兢,這審判如我所說是隱祕的,卻永不是不義的。至於那本於信的義:以色列人追求律法的義,反不能達到律法的義。
1:271
Quam Dominus dedit vocatis ut crederent. Quare ? quia non ex fide, sed quasi ex operibus. Quasi, quia non vere. Offenderunt. Offendunt ad lapidcm offensionis, velut argute legem defendendo, et naturam et liberum arbitrium præcipitando: quemadmodum philosophi mundi. In lapidem offensioni. Qui videt lapidem, lapis salutis est illi qui in euin non offendit: qui autem caecus est, offendit in lapidem. Ita et Judæi, quos excæcavit malitia sua, ne Christum agnoscerent, offenderunt in eum, faciendo illi injuriam, in quo gentes credentes apprehenderunt justitiam.
Which the Lord gave to the called, that they might believe. Why? Because it was not of faith, but as it were of works. 'As it were,' because not truly. They stumbled. They stumble at the stone of stumbling, as it were by subtly defending the law, and by casting themselves headlong through nature and free will: even as the philosophers of the world. Upon the stone of stumbling. He who sees the stone, the stone is one of salvation to him who does not stumble against it; but he who is blind stumbles against the stone. So too the Jews, whom their own malice blinded, lest they should acknowledge Christ, stumbled against him, doing him injury, whereas in him the believing Gentiles laid hold on righteousness.
這義是主賜給蒙召之人,使他們相信的。為什麼呢?因為以色列人不是本於信,倒像是本於行為。說「像是」,因為並非真是。他們就跌倒了。他們絆跌在那絆腳石上,彷彿精巧地為律法辯護,卻藉本性與自由意志使自己一頭栽下:正如世上的哲學家一般。絆跌在那絆腳石上。那看見這石頭的人,這石頭對於不絆跌其上的人乃是救恩之石;但那瞎眼的人卻絆跌在這石頭上。猶太人也是如此,他們被自己的惡毒弄瞎了眼,以致不認識基督,就絆跌在他身上,加害於他,而信主的外邦人反倒在他裡面得著了公義。
1:272
Ideo lapisoffensionis et petra scandali prædictus est Christus, quia I multi in passione ejus et nativitate scandalizantur, sicut scriptum est: Quia scandalizabantur in eo. Et ipse Paulus ad Corinthios: Christum crucifixum Judaeis scandalum, gentibus autem stultitiam: ipsis autem vocalis Christum Dei virtutem, et Dei sapientiam. Unde et hic sequitur: Qui credit in cum, non confundetur. Petrus qnoque dicit, quod credentibus lapis electus sit et angularis, incredulis vero offensionis. Sicut scriptum est: Ecce ponam in Sion lapidem offensionis, et petram scandali. In propheta Isaia hoc dixit. Et omnis qui credit in eum, non confundetur. Quia intelligit Dci virtulem et Dei sapientiam. CAP, x.
Therefore Christ was foretold as a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence, because many are scandalized at his Passion and his Nativity, as it is written: 'Because they were scandalized in him.' And Paul himself to the Corinthians: 'Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling-block, but to the Gentiles foolishness: but to those who are called, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.' Whence here too it follows: 'He who believes in him shall not be confounded.' Peter also says that to the believers the stone is elect and cornerstone, but to the unbelieving a stone of offence. As it is written: 'Behold, I lay in Sion a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence.' This he said in the prophet Isaiah. 'And everyone who believes in him shall not be confounded.' Because he understands the power of God and the wisdom of God. Chapter 10.
所以基督被預言為絆腳石與跌人的磐石,因為許多人因他的受難與降生而跌倒,正如經上所記:「因為他們厭棄他。」保羅自己也對哥林多人說:「我們卻是傳釘十字架的基督,在猶太人為絆腳石,在外邦人為愚拙;但在那蒙召的人,基督乃是神的能力、神的智慧。」因此這裡也接著說:「信靠他的人必不至於羞愧。」彼得也說,這石頭對信的人是蒙揀選、寶貴的房角石,對不信的人卻是絆腳的石頭。正如經上所記:「看哪,我在錫安放一塊絆腳的石頭、跌人的磐石。」這是他在先知以賽亞書中所說的。「凡信靠他的人必不至於羞愧。」因為他明白神的能力與神的智慧。第十章。
1:273
Fratres, voluntas quidem cordis mei et obsecratio ad Deum fit. Pro inimicis non labiis tantum, sed et corde orandum est. Pro illis in salutem. Pro Judæis. Testimonium enim perhibeo illis quod æmulationem Dei habent. Æmulationem habent sectandæ legis Dei. Sed non secundum screntiam. Nisi omnia quis secundum datam a Deo scientiam fecerit, impingit, etamsi quis consummatus fuerit. Si scientiam Dei haberent Judaei, cognoscerent quod Christus non contra legem venit, sed secundum legem, et quia non possint secundum legem justiOcari, sed Deus gratis ex fide justificat, non ei operibus legis, in quibus illi gloriabantur. Ignorantes enim Dei justitiam.
Brethren, the desire indeed of my heart, and my supplication to God, is made. For enemies one must pray not only with the lips, but also with the heart. For them unto salvation. For the Jews. 'For I bear them witness that they have a zeal of God.' They have a zeal for following the law of God. 'But not according to knowledge.' Unless a man does all things according to the knowledge given by God, he strikes his foot, even if he be perfect. If the Jews had the knowledge of God, they would recognize that Christ came not against the law, but according to the law, and that they cannot be justified according to the law, but that God justifies freely by faith, not by the works of the law in which they gloried. For being ignorant of God's righteousness.
弟兄們,我心裡所渴慕的,並向神所祈求的。為仇敵禱告不僅要用嘴唇,更要用心。是為他們得救。是為猶太人。「我可以證明他們向神有熱心。」他們有追隨神律法的熱心。「但不是按著真知識。」人若不凡事按著神所賜的知識而行,就必跌腳,縱然他已是完全人。猶太人若有神的真知識,便會認識基督並非違背律法而來,乃是按著律法而來的,並且他們不能靠律法稱義,唯有神憑信白白稱人為義,並非憑他們所誇的律法行為。因為他們不知道神的義。
1:274
ignoraverunt, quod gratis ex fide justificat, et non ex operibus legis, in quibus illi gloriabantur, dicentes se custodisse legem, quam non custodierunt, et per ipsam justificando se, non subjic unt se remissioni peccatorum, ne videantur fuisse peccatores. Non enim ut essent infideles cogebantur inviti, sed nolendo credere, infidelitatis crimine non carebant. Et suam quætentes statuere, justitiæ Dei non sunt subjecti. Quæ ex lege est, vel quam de libero esse fallebantur, ut falluntur arbilrio; et dum sibi tribuunt quod Dei est, justitiae Dei non sunt subjecti. Legis itaque justitia esi, jubcre quod Deo placet, ei vetare quod displicei.
they were ignorant that he justifies freely by faith, and not by the works of the law in which they gloried, saying that they had kept the law, which they had not kept, and by justifying themselves through it, they do not submit themselves to the remission of sins, lest they should seem to have been sinners. For they were not compelled unwillingly to be unbelievers, but by refusing to believe, they were not free from the guilt of unbelief. And seeking to establish their own, they were not subject to the righteousness of God. Which is of the law, or which they were deceived to think was of free will, as they are deceived; and while they attribute to themselves that which is God's, they are not subject to the righteousness of God. The righteousness of the law, then, is to command what pleases God, and to forbid what displeases him.
他們不知道他是憑信白白稱人為義,而非憑他們所誇的律法行為;他們口稱自己守了律法,其實並未遵守,並藉此自稱為義,就不肯服在罪得赦免之下,唯恐顯出他們原是罪人。他們並非被逼不得已而成為不信的,乃是自己不肯相信,因此難逃不信之罪。他們既想立自己的義,就不服神的義。這義本是出於律法的,或是他們受了自由意志的欺哄,以為出於自由意志,正如他們受欺哄一般;他們既把神的義歸給自己,就不服神的義。如此,律法的義乃是吩咐神所喜悅的,禁止神所不喜悅的。
1:275
In lege justitia est, servire, et extra eam nullum Dei| adjutorium ad recte vivendum requirere. Dei autem justitia est, non de viribus suis præsumere. Justitia Dei dicitur, non qua justus est Dens. sed qua dat h omini Deus, ut justus sit homo per Deum Finis enim tegis Christus, ad justitiam. Finis legis dicitur Christus, quia ipse est, vel in ipso est tota perfectio. Finis autem dicitur a consummando, non a consumendo, quia aliud est, finitus est panis, aliud finita est tela, illud ut non sit, istud ut perfcctum sit.
In the law is righteousness: to serve, and beyond it to seek no help of God for living rightly. But God's righteousness is: not to presume upon one's own strength. It is called the righteousness of God, not by which God is righteous, but by which God gives to man, that man may be righteous through God. For Christ is the end of the law, unto righteousness. Christ is called the end of the law, because he himself is, or in him is, the whole perfection. And it is called 'end' from being consummated, not from being consumed; for it is one thing that the bread is finished, another that the web is finished: the one that it should not be, the other that it should be perfected.
律法中有公義,就是服事律法,且在律法之外,不再求神別的幫助以正直度日。但神的義乃是:不倚仗自己的力量。這稱為神的義,並非指神藉此為義,乃指神藉此賜給人,使人藉著神成為義。因為律法的總結就是基督,使人得著義。基督被稱為律法的總結,因為全備的完全就是他自己,或在他裡面。這稱為「總結」,是取「成全」之意,而非「耗盡」之意;因為麵包吃完了是一回事,織物織完了又是一回事:前者是使其不再存在,後者是使其得以完成。
1:276
Qui ergo in Christo credit, ipse perficit legem, quia ad ipsum tendere et festinare debet omnis nostra intentio, qui ultra non habet quod requirat, quia omnia sunt impleta, quaecunque de eo in. sanctis Scripturis praedicta sunt. Omni credenti. Judaeo et Graeco. Moyses autem scripsit quoniam justitiam quæ ex lege est, qui fecerit homo. Moyses quidem secundum historiam de lege dixit, sed Apostolus illud ad Christum aptat, quia lex nec in coelo fuit, nec in abysso, et ideo illos jubet semper legem meditari, ut ibi inveniant Christum. Vivet in ea. Quæ autem tx fide est justitia, sic dicit.
He therefore who believes in Christ, himself fulfils the law, because toward him our whole intention ought to tend and hasten, since beyond him there is nothing further to seek, because all things are fulfilled, whatsoever were foretold of him in the holy Scriptures. To everyone who believes. To Jew and Greek. But Moses wrote that the righteousness which is of the law, the man who does it. Moses indeed spoke of the law according to the literal history, but the Apostle applies it to Christ, because the law was neither in heaven, nor in the abyss, and therefore he commands them always to meditate on the law, that they may there find Christ. He shall live in it. But the righteousness which is of faith speaks thus.
所以凡信基督的,他自己就成全了律法,因為我們整個心志都當歸向他、奔赴於他,因為在他以外再無可尋求的,因為聖經中凡預言論到他的,都已成全了。是給一切相信的人。給猶太人和希臘人。摩西寫著說,那出於律法的義,行這義的人。摩西固然按字面歷史論到律法,但使徒卻將其應用於基督,因為律法既不在天上,也不在深淵,所以他吩咐他們常常思想律法,好在其中尋見基督。就必因此活著。至於那本於信的義,卻這樣說。
1:277
Nemo ergo vivit illorum, quia nemo eam facit, quia ad comparationem tantorum peccatorum, etiamsi essent pauci qui facerent, nulli esse crederentur. Ne dixeris in corde tus: Quis ascendet in cælum? id est Christum deducere: aut, quis descendet in abyssum ? hoc est Christum ex mortuis revocare. Sed quid dicit Scriptura ? Prope est verbum in ore tuo, et in corde tuo. Hoc est, nec de passione, nec de resurrectione, nec de ascensione ejus, quod non a semetipso factum sit, in corde tuo debeas dubitare. Hoc est verbum fidei, quod prædicamus. Hoc est Novum Testamentum. Quia si confitearis in ore tua Dominum Jesum, et in corde tuo credideris quod Deus illum excitavit a mortuis, salvus eris.
No one of them therefore lives, because no one does it, for in comparison with sins so great, even if there were a few who did it, they would be believed to be as nothing. Do not say in your heart: 'Who shall ascend into heaven?' that is, to bring Christ down: or, 'Who shall descend into the abyss?' that is, to call Christ back from the dead. But what does the Scripture say? 'The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart.' That is, you ought not in your heart to doubt anything concerning his Passion, nor his Resurrection, nor his Ascension, as though it was not done by himself. This is the word of faith, which we preach. This is the New Testament. Because if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you shall be saved.
所以他們中間無一人活著,因為無一人行出這義,因為與這麼多的罪相比,縱有少數行出的人,也必被算為烏有。你不要心裡說:「誰要升到天上去呢?」就是要領基督下來:或說:「誰要下到深淵去呢?」就是要領基督從死裡上來。但經上怎麼說呢?「這道離你不遠,正在你口裡、在你心裡。」意思是,你在心裡不當懷疑任何關乎他的受難、復活、升天之事,好像那不是他親自成就的一般。這就是我們所傳信德之道。這就是新約。因為你若口裡認耶穌為主,心裡信神叫他從死裡復活,就必得救。
1:278
Testimonium cordis est oris confessio.Corde enim creditur ad justitiam; ore autem fit confessio ad salutem. Delictis præteritis, non futuris. Ergo si fides sufficit ad justitiam, et confessio ad salutem, J adæus et Græcus unum sunt in Christo. Dicit enim Scriptura: Omnis qui credit in illum non confundetur. Non Jud.rus tantum. Non enim est distinctio Judai et Græci. De pristino peccato vel idololatria: non ergo illos vos potestis confundere, quos Scriptura dicit confundi non posse. (Incipit expositio de libro sancti Augustini excerpta eloco ad sanctum Simplicianum, De Jacob et Esau a..
The testimony of the heart is the confession of the mouth. For with the heart man believes unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. Of past sins, not of future. Therefore if faith suffices unto righteousness, and confession unto salvation, Jew and Greek are one in Christ. For the Scripture says: 'Everyone who believes in him shall not be confounded.' Not the Jew only. For there is no distinction of Jew and Greek. Of former sin or of idolatry: you cannot therefore confound those whom the Scripture says cannot be confounded. (Here begins an exposition excerpted from the book of Saint Augustine, from the passage 'To Saint Simplicianus,' concerning Jacob and Esau;
心裡所信便是口裡承認的憑據。因為人心裡相信就可以稱義;口裡承認就可以得救。是指過去的罪,而非將來的罪。所以,倘若信德足以稱義,承認足以得救,那麼猶太人與希臘人在基督裡便合而為一了。因為經上說:「凡信靠他的人必不至於羞愧。」不僅是猶太人。因為猶太人和希臘人並無分別。是論到從前的罪或拜偶像之罪:所以你們不能使那些經上說不能羞愧的人蒙羞。(此處開始一段釋義,摘自聖奧古斯丁之著作,取自〈致聖辛普利西安努斯〉一書中論雅各與以掃之處;
1:279
licet non in ordine tractatus hujus perita esse videatur, tamen ideo prætermissa non est, quia necessaria atque perfecta est, et obhoc hic conscripta, ut lociipsius obscuritate revelata legentis sensum epidenter illuminet.) Non ex opertbus, sed ex vocante dictum est: Quia major serviet minori. Vocantis est ergo gratia, percipientis verogratiamconsequentersuntopera bona: non quæ gratiam pariant, sed quae gratia pariantur: non enim ut ferveat, calefacit ignis, sed qu'a fervet. Nec ideo bene curri! rota, ut rotunda sit, sed quia rotunda csL Sic nemo propterea bene operatur ut accipiat grat am, sed quia acpepit. Quomodo enim potest juste vivere, qui non fuerit justificatus?
although it may not seem to fit in the order of this treatise, yet it has not been passed over, because it is necessary and complete, and on that account it has been written down here, so that, the obscurity of the passage itself being revealed, it may evidently illuminate the reader's understanding.) It was said not of works, but of him who calls: 'That the elder shall serve the younger.' The grace, therefore, is of him who calls; and good works consequently belong to him who receives the grace: not works that beget grace, but works that are begotten by grace: for fire does not heat in order that it may be fervent, but because it is fervent. Nor does a wheel run well in order that it may be round, but because it is round. So no one works well in order that he may receive grace, but because he has received it. For how can he live justly, who has not been justified?
雖然這段釋義在本論著的次序上或許看似不甚相合,然而並未被略去,因為它是必要且完整的,故此記錄於此,好叫該經文本身的晦澀既被揭明,便可顯然照亮讀者的悟性。)那話不是本於行為,乃是本於那呼召者說的:「將來大的要服事小的。」所以恩典是出於那呼召者的;而善行則相應地屬於那領受恩典的人:不是那生出恩典的行為,乃是那由恩典所生的行為:因為火發熱並非為要變熱,乃是因為它熱。輪子轉得好也並非為要變圓,乃是因為它圓。照樣,無人行善是為要領受恩典,乃是因為他已領受了。因為那尚未被稱義的人,怎能公義地生活呢?
1:280
quoinodo sancte vivere, si non fuerit sanctificatus? vel omnino vivere, qui non fuerit justilicatus [alias vivificatus]? Justificat autem gratia, ut justificatus possit vivere juste. Prima est igitur gratia, secunda opera bona, si. cut alio loco dicit: Ei autem qui operatur, merces non imputatur secundum gratiam, sed secandum debitum. Non enim intelligebant, quia eo ipso quo gratia est evanselica, operibus non debetur: alioquin gratia jam non est gratia. In multis locis boc saepe testatur, fideigratiam præponens operibus: n n ut opera exstinguat, sed ut ostendat non esse opera præcedentia gratiam, sed consequentia:
How can he live holily, if he has not been sanctified? or live at all, who has not been justified (or, in another reading, quickened)? But grace justifies, so that the justified may be able to live justly. First therefore is grace, second are good works, as he says in another place: 'But to him who works, the reward is not reckoned according to grace, but according to debt.' For they did not understand that by the very fact that it is evangelical grace, it is not owed to works: otherwise grace is now no longer grace. In many places he often testifies this, setting the grace of faith before works: not that he may extinguish works, but that he may show that works do not precede grace, but follow it:
那尚未成聖的人,怎能過聖潔的生活呢?那尚未被稱義(另一讀作:尚未被賜生命)的人,又怎能存活呢?但恩典使人稱義,好叫已稱義的人能公義地生活。所以恩典居首,善行居次,正如他在別處所說:「作工的得工價,不算恩典,乃是該得的。」因為他們不明白,正因這是福音的恩典,它就不歸功於行為:不然,恩典就不再是恩典了。他在許多處常常見證此理,把信德的恩典置於行為之先:並非要抹煞行為,乃是要顯明行為並非先於恩典,而是隨從恩典:
1:281
ut scilicet non se guisque arbitretur ideo percepisse gratiam, qu a bene pperatus est; sed bene operari non posse, nisi per fidem perceperit gratiam. Incipit autem homo percipe; e gratiam, ei quo incipit Deo credere, vel interna vel externa admonitione motus ad fidem. Sed interest quibus articulis temporum, vel celeb: atione sacramentorum gratia plenior et evidentior infundatur. Sed ut de re de qua agitur potius loquamur, ad frangendam atque dejiciendam superbiam hominum ingratorum gratiæ Dei, et audentium gloriari de meritis, ista commemofantur. Cum enim nondum nati fuissent neque aliquid egissent bonum vel malum, non ex operibus, sed ex vocante dictum est: Quia major serviet minori.
namely, that no one may suppose that he has received grace because he has done well; but rather that he cannot do well, unless through faith he has received grace. But a man begins to receive grace from the time when he begins to believe in God, being moved to faith by an inner or an outer admonition. Yet it matters at what points of time, or by the celebration of the sacraments, the fuller and more evident grace is poured in. But that we may speak rather of the matter under discussion, these things are recalled in order to break and cast down the pride of men ungrateful to the grace of God, and daring to glory in their own merits. For when they were not yet born, nor had done anything good or evil, it was said not of works, but of him who calls: 'That the elder shall serve the younger.'
就是說,免得有人以為自己領受恩典是因為行了善事;倒要曉得,他若非藉信德領受了恩典,就不能行善。人開始領受恩典,乃是從他開始信神之時,或被內在或外在的勸誡感動而生信德。然而在哪些時刻,或藉聖禮的施行,那更豐盛更顯明的恩典被澆灌下來,這是有分別的。但我們寧可就所論之事來說,這些話被提起,乃是為要挫敗並打倒那些辜負神恩、竟敢以自己功德誇口之人的驕傲。因為雙子尚未生下來,善惡還沒有做出來,那話不是本於行為,乃是本於那呼召者說的:「將來大的要服事小的。」
1:282
Vocautis ergo est gratia. Si igitur electio, per praescientiam, pracscivit autem Deus fidem Jacob, unde probas, quia non etiam ex operibus elegit eum? Si propterea, quia nondum nati erant, et nondum aliquid egerant bonum aut malum; ita etiam nondem cred derat aliquis eorum: sed, sicut præscientia vidit crediturum, ita præpscientia videre poterat operaturum. Ut quomodo dicitur electus propter fidem futuram, quam praesciebat Deus, sic alius possit dicere, propter opera futura potius electum, quæ nibilominus præsciebat Deus. Quapropter unde ostendit Apostolus, non ex operibus dictum esse: Major serviet minori:
The grace, therefore, is of him who calls. If then it is election through foreknowledge, and God foreknew the faith of Jacob, whence do you prove that he did not also choose him out of works? If for this reason, because they were not yet born, and had not yet done anything good or evil; likewise none of them had yet believed either: but, as foreknowledge saw that he would believe, so foreknowledge could have seen that he would work. So that, just as he is said to be chosen on account of future faith, which God foreknew, so another might say that he was rather chosen on account of future works, which God nonetheless foreknew. Wherefore, how does the Apostle show that it was said not of works: 'The elder shall serve the younger'?
所以恩典是出於那呼召者的。那麼,若這揀選是藉著預知,而神既預知了雅各的信德,你憑什麼證明他不也是本於行為揀選了他呢?你若說,這是因為雙子尚未生下,尚未做出任何善惡;那麼同樣地,他們中間也尚未有一人相信:但預知既看見他將要相信,預知也照樣能看見他將要行事。這樣,正如說雅各是因神所預知他將來的信德而蒙揀選,別人也可以說,他倒是因神照樣預知的將來的行為而蒙揀選。那麼,使徒是憑什麼顯明「大的要服事小的」這話不是本於行為呢?
1:283
si quominus nondum nati erant, non solum non ex operibus, sed ex fide dictum est, quia utrumque deerat nondum natis. Non igitur et præscientia voluit intelligi factam electionem minoris, ut major ei serviret. Volens enim ostendere, non ex operibus factam, propterea intulit diceis: Cum enim nondum nati fuissent, neque aliquid egissent bonum seu malum. Alioquin poterat ei dici, sed jam scicbat Deus quis quid esset acturus. Quamobrem unde illa electio facta sit quæritur; quia si non ex operibus quæ nOli erant in nondum natis, nec ex fide, quia nec ipsa erat. Unde igitur ?
If it be because they were not yet born, then not only was it not said of works, but neither was it said of faith, because both were lacking in those not yet born. Not therefore by foreknowledge either did he will it to be understood that the election of the younger was made, so that the elder should serve him. For, wishing to show that it was not made of works, he therefore added, saying: 'For when they were not yet born, nor had done anything good or evil.' Otherwise it could be said to him: but God already knew who would do what. Wherefore it is asked, whence that election was made; because if not of works, which were not in those not yet born, nor of faith, because that also was not there. Whence then?
若說這是因為雙子尚未生下,那麼這話不僅不是本於行為說的,也不是本於信德說的,因為雙子既尚未生下,這二者便都沒有。所以他也並非藉著預知,要人以為對小的所作的揀選,是為叫大的服事他。因為他既要顯明這揀選不是本於行為,就因此加上說:「因為雙子還沒有生下來,善惡還沒有做出來。」不然,就可以對他說:但神早已知道誰將要做什麼。因此便有此問:這揀選究竟本於什麼?因為若不是本於行為(因為尚未生下的雙子沒有行為),也不是本於信德(因為信德也還沒有)。那麼究竟本於什麼呢?
1:284
an dicendum quod nulla electio fuerit, non existente aliqua diversitate in utero matris, vel fidei, vel operum, vel quorumlibet omnino meritorum ? Sed dictum est: Ut secundum electionem propositum Dci maneret. Et ideo quaerimos, quia dictum est: nisi forte sic est distinguenda sententia, non ut intelligamus tanquam ideo non ex operibus, sed es vocante dictum esset: Major serviet minori: ut secundum electionem propositum Dei maneret; sed ita potius, ut hoc de nondum natis et nondum aliquid operatis esemplum datum accipiatur, ne aliqua electio hic possit intelligi. Cum enim nondum nati fuissent, neque aliquid egissent bonum sive malum, ut secundum electionem propositum Dei maneret:
Or must it be said that there was no election, since there existed no diversity in the mother's womb, whether of faith, or of works, or of any merits whatsoever? But it was said: 'That the purpose of God according to election might stand.' And therefore we inquire, because it was said: unless perhaps the sentence is to be distinguished thus, not so that we understand that it was said 'not of works, but of him who calls: The elder shall serve the younger,' as though for this end, that the purpose of God according to election might stand; but rather thus, that this example be taken as given concerning those not yet born and not yet having done anything, lest any election be here understood. For when they were not yet born, nor had done anything good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand:
抑或應當說,根本沒有揀選,因為在母腹中並不存在任何差異,無論是信德、行為、或任何功德的差異麼?但經上說:「為要顯明神揀選人的旨意得以堅立。」因此我們便探究,因為經上說:除非這句話應當這樣分別理解——並非說我們要以為「不是本於行為,乃是本於那呼召者說『大的要服事小的』」的目的是為叫神揀選的旨意得以堅立;倒不如說,這乃是把此例當作論到那尚未生下、尚未做出任何事的雙子而給的例證,免得人在此以為有什麼揀選。因為雙子還沒有生下來,善惡還沒有做出來,為要顯明神揀選人的旨意得以堅立:
1:285
id est, neque aliquid egissent bonum aut malum, ut propter ipsam actionem electo aliqua fieret ejus qui bene egerat. Cum ergo nulla esset electio bene agentis, secundum quam maneret propositum Dei, non ex operibus, sed ex vocante: id est ex eo qui vocando ad fi lem gratia jusiificat impium, dictum est: Quia major serviet minori. Non ergo secundum electionem propositum Dei maneret, sed ex proposito electo, id est, non quia invenit Deus opera bona in hominibus quae eligat, ideo manet propositum justificationis ipsius: sed quia manet illud ut justificet credentes, ideo inVenit opera quae jam eligat ad regnum captorum. Nam nisi eSset electio, non essent electi, nec recte diceretur:
that is, they had not yet done anything good or evil, so that on account of that very action any election of him who had done well might be made. Since therefore there was no election of one doing well, according to which the purpose of God might stand, it was said not of works, but of him who calls: that is, of him who by calling to faith justifies the ungodly by grace: 'That the elder shall serve the younger.' Not therefore that the purpose of God might stand according to election, but by election from the purpose; that is, not because God found good works in men which he might choose, does the purpose of his justification stand: but because that stands, that he may justify believers, therefore he finds works which he may then choose unto the kingdom of the taken. For unless there were an election, there would be no elect, nor would it rightly be said:
就是說,雙子尚未做出任何善惡,以致因那行動本身,便為那行善者作出某種揀選。既然如此,並沒有對行善者的揀選,使神的旨意能照此堅立,所以那話不是本於行為,乃是本於那呼召者說的:就是本於那藉呼召人歸信、憑恩典稱不敬虔者為義的那位:「大的要服事小的。」所以並非為使神的旨意照著揀選得以堅立,乃是從旨意而有揀選;就是說,神稱人為義的旨意得以堅立,並非因為神在人身上找到可揀選的善行:乃是因為那旨意堅立,要使信的人稱義,他就因此找到善行,可揀選人進入那被取者之國。因為若沒有揀選,就沒有蒙揀選的人,也不能正當地說:
1:286
Quis accusabit adversus electos Dei ? Non tamen electio praecedit justificationem, sed electionem justilicatio. Nemo enim eligitur, nisi jam distans ab illo qui rejicitur. Unde quod dictum est, quia elegit nos Deus ante mundi constitutionem, non video quomodo sit dictum, nisi præscientia. IIic autem quod ait: Non ex operibus, sed ex vocante dictum est ei, quia major serviet minori; non eleclione meritorum, quae post justificationem gratiæ proveniunt, sed liberalilate donorum Dei voluit intelligi, ne quis de operibus extollatur. Gratia enim Dei salvi facti sumus: et hoc non ex operibus, sed Dei donum est: non ex operibus, ne forte quis extollatur.
'Who shall accuse against the elect of God?' Yet election does not precede justification, but justification precedes election. For no one is chosen, unless he is already distinct from him who is rejected. Whence, as to what is said, that God chose us before the foundation of the world, I do not see how it is said, except by foreknowledge. But here, where he says: 'It was said to her not of works, but of him who calls, that the elder shall serve the younger,' he willed it to be understood not by an election of merits, which come after the justification of grace, but by the liberality of God's gifts, lest anyone be exalted over works. 'For by the grace of God we have been saved: and this not of works, but it is the gift of God: not of works, lest perhaps anyone be exalted.'
「誰能控告神所揀選的人呢?」然而揀選並不在稱義之先,乃是稱義在揀選之先。因為無人蒙揀選,除非他已與那被棄絕者有所分別。因此,經上說神在創世以前揀選了我們,這話除了藉預知之外,我看不出還能怎樣理解。但在這裡,他說:「有話對她說,不是本於行為,乃是本於那呼召者,大的要服事小的」,他的用意乃是要人明白,這不是憑功德的揀選(功德是在恩典稱義之後才有的),而是憑神恩賜的慷慨,免得有人因行為自高。「你們得救是本乎恩;這並不是出於行為,乃是神所賜的;也不是出於行為,免得有人自誇。」
1:287
Quæritur autem..trum vel fides mercatur hominis justificationem, an vero ncc fidei merita præcedant misericordiam Dei, sed ct fides ipsa inter dona gratiæ numeretur. Qu.a et hoc loco cum divisset: Non ex operibus, non ait, sed ex fide dictum est ei, quia major serviet minori; ait autem: Sed ex vocante: nemo enim credit, qui non vocatur. Misericors autem Deus vocat: nullis hoc vel fidei meritis largiens, quia merita fidei se;quuntur vocationem potius quam praecedant. Quomodo enim credent ei quem non audierunt? Et qu amodo audient sine praedicane? Nisi ergo vocando præcedat misericordia Dei, nec credere quisquam potest, ut ex hoc incipiat justificari, et accipere fa. cultatem bene operandi.
But it is asked, whether either faith merits a man's justification, or whether even the merits of faith do not precede the mercy of God, but faith itself also is numbered among the gifts of grace. Since even in this place, when he had said 'not of works,' he did not say, 'but it was said to her of faith, that the elder shall serve the younger'; but he said: 'But of him who calls': for no one believes who is not called. And a merciful God calls: bestowing this by no merits even of faith, because the merits of faith follow the calling rather than precede it. 'For how shall they believe in him whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?' Unless therefore the mercy of God precede by calling, no one can even believe, so as to begin thereby to be justified, and to receive the ability of working well.
但這裡有一問:究竟是信德賺得了人的稱義呢,抑或連信德的功德也不在神的憐憫之先,而信德本身也算在恩典的恩賜之中呢?因為即使在此處,他既說了「不是本於行為」,卻沒有說「乃是本於信德,有話對她說,大的要服事小的」;他乃是說:「乃是本於那呼召者」:因為未蒙召的無人相信。而施憐憫的神呼召人:他賜下這呼召,甚至不憑信德的任何功德,因為信德的功德是隨從呼召,而非在呼召之先。「他們未曾聽見,怎能信他呢?沒有傳道的,怎能聽見呢?」所以,除非神的憐憫藉呼召為先,就無人能相信,以致由此開始被稱義,並領受行善的能力。
1:288
Ergo ante omne merituin est gratia. Etenim Christus pro impiis mortuus est. Ex vocante igitur minor accipit, non ex ullis meritis operum suorum, ut major ei serviret, ut etiam quod scriptum est: Jacob dilexi, exvocantesit Deo, non ex operante Jacob. Quid deinde Esau quod servit minori, et quod scriptum cst: Esam autem odio habui: qui bus malis suis hoc meruit, cum et ipse nondum natus fuisset, neque aliquid egisset boni aut mali, quando dictum est: Et major serviet minori? An forte quemadmodum illud de Jacob nullis meritis bonæ actiopis dictum est, ita Esau nullis meritis malæ actionis odiosus ?
Therefore before every merit is grace. For indeed Christ died for the ungodly. From him who calls, then, the younger receives it, not from any merits of his own works, that the elder should serve him; so that even what is written, 'Jacob I loved,' is of God who calls, not of Jacob who works. And what next of Esau, that he serves the younger, and what is written: 'But Esau I hated': by what evils of his own did he merit this, since he too had not yet been born, nor had done anything good or evil, when it was said: 'And the elder shall serve the younger'? Or is it perhaps that, just as that word concerning Jacob was said with no merits of a good action, so Esau is hateful with no merits of an evil action?
所以恩典在一切功德之先。因為基督確是為不敬虔的人死了。那麼,小的乃是從那呼召者領受的,並非從他自己行為的任何功德,以致大的服事他;因此連經上所記「雅各是我所愛的」也是出於那呼召的神,而非出於那行事的雅各。至於以掃,論到他服事小的,並經上所記「以掃是我所惡的」:他是憑自己什麼惡行賺得這事的呢?既然他也尚未生下,尚未做出任何善惡,何以說出「大的要服事小的」這話呢?抑或,正如論到雅各的話乃是在毫無善行功德的情況下說的,以掃之被恨惡,也照樣是在毫無惡行功德的情況下麼?
1:289
Si enim, quia præsciebat Deus futura opera rjus mala, propterea eum praedestinavit ut serviret minori, propterea prædestinavit et Jacob, ut ei major serviret, quia futura ejus bona opera præsciebat: et falsum est jam quod ait: Non ex operibus. Si autem verum esi, quod non ex operibus, et inde hoc probat, quia de nondum natis, nondumque aliquid operatis hoc dictum est: unde nec ex fide, quæ nundum natis similiter nondum erat, quo merito E au odio habetur antequam nasceretur: quod enim fecit Deus ea quæ diligeret, nulla quæstio est. Si autem dicamus eum fecisse quæ odisset, absurdum est, occurrente alia scriptura, et dicente: Neqne enim odio habens aliquid constituisti;
For if, because God foreknew his future evil works, he therefore predestined him to serve the younger, then he likewise predestined Jacob, that the elder should serve him, because he foreknew his future good works: and then it is already false what he says, 'not of works.' But if it is true that it is 'not of works,' and he proves this from the fact that it was said of those not yet born, nor having yet done anything: whence it is also not of faith, which likewise was not yet in those not yet born, by what merit is Esau hated before he was born? For that God made the things which he would love, there is no question. But if we should say that he made the things which he would hate, it is absurd, another Scripture meeting us and saying: 'Neither did you establish anything in hatred;'
因為,若神因預知以掃將來的惡行,就此預定他服事小的,那麼他也照樣預定了雅各,使大的服事他,因他預知雅各將來的善行:如此,他所說的「不是本於行為」便已成為虛謊了。但若「不是本於行為」是真的,且他從「這話是論到尚未生下、尚未做出任何事的雙子」這一點加以證明:那麼這也就不是本於信德,因為信德在尚未生下的雙子中同樣還沒有,那麼以掃在未生之先是憑什麼功德被恨惡的呢?至於神造他所要愛的萬物,這是毫無疑問的。但我們若說他造了他所要恨的,這便荒謬了,因為另有經文迎面而來,說:「你並未在恨惡中創立任何物;」
1:290
et nihil odisli eorum quæ fecisti, aut c instituisti. Quo enim merito factus est sol? aut quid offendit luna, ut tanto illo inferior ? vel quid promeruit, ut sideribus cæteris tanto clarior crearetur ? Sed omnia bona creala sunt, quæque in genere suo. Non enim diceret Deus: Solem dilcxi, lunam autem odio habui; aut: Lunam dilexi, stellas autem odio habui: sicut dixit: Jacob dilexi, Esau autem odio habui. Sed illa omnia dilexit, quamvis excellentiae diversis gradibus ordinata: quoniam vidit Deus quia bona sunt, cum dicto ejus sint instituta! Ut autem odisset Esau, nisi injustitiæ merito, injustum est. Quod si concedimus, incipit et Jacob justitiæ merito diligi.
'and you hated none of the things which you have made, or have established.' For by what merit was the sun made? or what did the moon offend, that it should be so much inferior to it? or what did it earn, that it should be created so much brighter than the other stars? But all things were created good, each in its own kind. For God would not say: 'The sun I loved, but the moon I hated'; or: 'The moon I loved, but the stars I hated': as he said: 'Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.' But he loved all those things, though ordered in diverse degrees of excellence: since God saw that they were good, being established by his word! But that he should have hated Esau, unless by the merit of injustice, is unjust. And if we grant this, then Jacob too begins to be loved by the merit of righteousness.
「凡你所造、所立的,你並未恨惡其中任何一物。」因為太陽是憑什麼功德被造的呢?月亮又冒犯了什麼,以致比太陽如此低微?它又賺得了什麼,以致被造得比其餘星辰如此明亮?然而萬物都是被造為善的,各按其類。因為神絕不會說:「太陽是我所愛的,月亮卻是我所惡的」;或說:「月亮是我所愛的,眾星卻是我所惡的」:如同他說:「雅各是我所愛的,以掃卻是我所惡的。」他乃是愛那一切,雖然按不同等次的優越有序排列:因為神看著一切是好的,都是憑他的話語所立的!但他若非因不義的功德而恨惡以掃,這恨惡便是不義。而我們若承認這點,那麼雅各也就開始因公義的功德而蒙愛了。
1:291
Quod si verum est, falsum est quod non ex opcribus. An forte ex justitia fidei? Quid ergo te adjuvat, Cum enim nondum nat! fuissent? quandoquidem in nondum nato nec jutitia fidei poterat esse. Vidit itaque Apostolus quid ex his verbis possit animo audientis vel legentis occurrere, statimque subjecit: Quid ergo dicemus? Nunquid iniquitas est apud Deum? Absit. Et quasi docens quomodo absit: Moysi enim dicit, inquit: Miserebor cui misertus ero, et misericordiam præstabo cui misericors fu ro. Quibus verbis solvit quaestionem, an potius arctius colligavit ? Idipsum enim est, quod maxime movet:
But if that is true, then it is false that it is 'not of works.' Or is it perhaps of the righteousness of faith? What then does it help you, 'For when they were not yet born'? since in one not yet born not even the righteousness of faith could exist. And so the Apostle saw what could occur to the mind of the hearer or reader from these words, and at once he added: 'What then shall we say? Is there injustice with God? God forbid.' And as though teaching how it is not: 'For he says to Moses,' he says, 'I will have mercy on whom I have had mercy, and I will show mercy to whom I have been merciful.' By which words did he solve the question, or rather more tightly bind it together? For it is this very thing that most disturbs us:
但那若是真的,則「不是本於行為」便是虛謊了。抑或這是本於信德的義麼?那麼「因為雙子還沒有生下來」這話對你有何幫助呢?既然在尚未生下的胎兒身上,連信德的義也不能存在。因此使徒既看出,聽者或讀者的心裡可能因這些話而生起什麼疑問,便立刻加上說:「這樣,我們可說什麼呢?難道神有什麼不公平麼?斷乎沒有。」他彷彿要教導這如何不是不公平,就說:「因他對摩西說,我要憐憫誰就憐憫誰,要恩待誰就恩待誰。」他用這些話是解開了這問題呢,還是把它捆得更緊了呢?因為最叫我們困擾的正是這事:
1:292
si miseretur cui misertus erit, et misericordiam praestabit cui miscricors fuerit, cur hæc miseric rdia defuit Esau « ut etiam per illam bonus esset, quemadmodum per illam bonus factus est Jncob? An ideo dictum est: Misercbor cui misertus ero, et misericordiam praestabo cui misericors fuero, quia cui misertus est Deus, ut eum vocet, misercbitur ejus ut credat; et cui misericors fuerit ut credat, mi ericordiam praestabit, hoc est, faciet eum misericordem, ut etiam bene operetur? Unde admonemur nec ipsis operibus misericordiæ quemquam oportere gloriari et extolli, quod cis quasi suis Deum promeruerit:
if he has mercy on whom he will have had mercy, and shows mercy to whom he will have been merciful, why was this mercy lacking to Esau, that through it he too might be good, just as through it Jacob was made good? Or was it said, 'I will have mercy on whom I have had mercy, and I will show mercy to whom I have been merciful,' for this reason: because on whom God has had mercy, that he may call him, he will have mercy on him that he may believe; and to whom he has been merciful that he may believe, he will show mercy, that is, he will make him merciful, that he may also work well? Whence we are admonished that no one ought to glory or be exalted even in the very works of mercy, as though he had earned God by them as by his own:
他若憐憫他所要憐憫的,恩待他所要恩待的,那麼為何以掃缺了這憐憫,以致不能藉此也成為善的,如同雅各藉此成了善的呢?抑或「我要憐憫誰就憐憫誰,要恩待誰就恩待誰」這話乃是為此緣故而說的:因為神憐憫誰,要呼召他,就必憐憫他,使他相信;他恩待誰使他相信,就必施憐憫,就是使他成為施憐憫的,以致他也行善麼?由此我們受了勸誡,就是無人當因憐憫的行為本身而誇口自高,好像藉這些行為、當作自己的功勞而賺得了神:
1:293
quandoquidem ut haberet ipsam misericordiam, ille praestitit, qui misericordiam praestabit cui misericors fuerit. Quod si eam credendo se meruisse quis jactat, noverit eum sibi præstitisse ut crederet, qui. miseretur, inspirando fidem, cujus misertus est: ut adhuc infideli vocationem impartiret. Jam enim discernitur fidelis ab impio. Quid enim habes, inquit, quod non accepisti V si autem accepisti, quid gloriaris quasi non acceperis' Recte quidem boc, sed cur hæc misericordia subtracta est ab Esau, ut non sic vocaretur, ut et vocato inspiraretur fides, et credens misericors fieret, ut bene operaretur? An forte quia noluit?
since, that he might have that very mercy, he bestowed it who will show mercy to whom he will have been merciful. But if anyone boasts that he merited it by believing, let him know that he who has mercy bestowed upon him that he should believe, by inspiring the faith of him on whom he had mercy: that he might impart the calling to one still unbelieving. For now the believer is distinguished from the ungodly. 'For what have you,' he says, 'that you did not receive? But if you received it, why do you glory as if you had not received it?' This indeed is right; but why was this mercy withdrawn from Esau, so that he was not so called, that even, being called, faith might be inspired in him, and believing he might become merciful, that he might work well? Or is it perhaps because he was unwilling?
因為,為使人得著那憐憫本身,是那要恩待他所憐憫之人的神所賜的。但若有人自誇,說他是藉相信賺得了這憐憫,他就當曉得,那施憐憫的神,藉著在他所憐憫之人心裡感發信德,賜他相信:好將這呼召賜給那仍不信的人。因為如今信的人已與不敬虔的人有了分別。他說:「你有什麼不是領受的呢?若是領受的,為何自誇,彷彿不是領受的呢?」這話固然不錯;但為何這憐憫從以掃身上撤去了,以致他未曾如此蒙召,好叫他既蒙召,信德也在他裡面被感發,而他因信成為施憐憫的,以致行善呢?抑或是因為他自己不肯麼?
1:294
Si ergo Jacob ideo credidit quia voluit, non ei Deus donavit fidem, sed eam sibi ipse volendo præstitit, et habuit aliquid quod non accepit. An quia nemo potest credere, nisi velit; nemo velit, nisi vocetur? nemo autem sibi potest præstare ut vocaretur: vocando Deus praestat et fidem, quia sine vocatione non potest quisquam credere, quamvis nullus credat invitus. Quomodo enim credent ei quem non audierunt? aut quomodo audient sine praedicante? Nemo itaque credit non vocatus, sed non omnis credit vocatus; multi enim sunt vocati, pauci autem electi. Utique ii qui vocantem non contempserunt, sed oredendo secuti sunt, volentes autem sine dubio crediderunt. Quid ergo quod sequitur ?
If therefore Jacob believed because he willed, then God did not give him faith, but he bestowed it upon himself by willing, and had something which he did not receive. Or is it because no one can believe unless he wills; yet no one wills unless he is called? but no one can bestow upon himself that he should be called: by calling, God bestows both, and faith too, because without calling no one can believe, although no one believes unwilling. 'For how shall they believe in him whom they have not heard? or how shall they hear without a preacher?' No one therefore believes who is not called, but not everyone who is called believes; for many are called, but few are chosen. Assuredly those who did not despise him who calls, but followed by believing, without doubt believed willingly. What then of that which follows?
所以,雅各若是因自己願意而相信,那麼就不是神賜給他信德,乃是他藉自己的意願賜給了自己,且有了他所未領受的東西。抑或這是因為:無人能相信,除非他願意;然而無人願意,除非他蒙召麼?但無人能使自己蒙召:神藉呼召賜下這一切,連信德也是,因為未蒙召便無人能相信,雖然也無人是不情願而相信的。「他們未曾聽見,怎能信他呢?沒有傳道的,怎能聽見呢?」所以未蒙召的無人相信,但蒙召的並非人人相信;因為被召的人多,選上的人少。誠然,那些不藐視呼召者、卻藉相信跟隨他的人,無疑是甘心相信的。那麼隨後那話又當如何呢?
1:295
Igitur non volentis, neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei. An quia nec velle possumus, nisi vocati: et nihil valet velle nostrum, nisi ut perficiamus adjuvet Deus? Opus est ergo velle currere. Non enim frustra diceretur: In terra pax hominibus bonae voluntatis. Et: Sic currite, ut comprehendatis. Non tamen volentis, neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei, ut et quod volumus adipiscamur, et quo volumus perveniamus. Noluit ergo Esau, et non cucurrit; sed et si voluisset, et cucurrisset, Dei adjutorio pervenisset, qui ei etiam velle et currere vocando praestaret, nisi vocatione contempta reprobus fieret. Aliter enim Deus praestat ut velimus; alitcr præstat quod voluerimus.
'Therefore it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy.' Or is it because we cannot even will unless we are called: and our willing avails nothing, unless God help us to bring it to completion? It is necessary, then, to will to run. For it would not be said in vain: 'On earth peace to men of good will.' And: 'So run, that you may obtain.' Yet it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy, that we both attain what we will, and reach whither we will. Esau therefore was unwilling, and did not run; but even if he had willed and had run, he would have attained by the help of God, who would bestow upon him by calling both to will and to run, unless, the calling being despised, he became reprobate. For in one way God bestows that we may will; in another he bestows what we shall have willed.
「這樣看來,這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神。」抑或這是因為:我們若非蒙召,連願意也不能;而我們的意願毫無用處,除非神幫助我們把它完成麼?如此,人必須願意奔跑。因為那話並非徒然說的:「在地上平安歸與他所喜悅的人。」又說:「你們也當這樣奔跑,好叫你們得著獎賞。」然而這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神,好叫我們既得著所願的,又到達所願往之處。所以以掃不肯,也未奔跑;但他即便願意、也奔跑了,也必藉神的幫助得著,因為神必藉呼召賜給他立志與奔跑,除非他藐視呼召而成為被棄絕的。因為神使我們立志是一回事,賜下我們所立志的又是另一回事。
1:296
Ut velimus enim, et suum esse voluit et nostrum: suum vocando, nostrum sequendo. Quod autem voluerimus, solus præstat: id est, posse bene agere, et semper beate vivere. Verumtamen Esau nondum natus, nihil horum possit velle, seu nolle. Cur ergo in utero positus improbatus est i Reditur enim ad illas difficultates, non solum sua obscuritate, sed etiam nostra jam multa repetitione molestiores. Cur enim Esau reprobatus est nondum natus, qui nec credere poterat vocanti, nec contemnere vocationem, nec boni vel mali aliquid operari? Si præscientia futuræ malæ voluntatis ejus, cur non et Jacob praescientia Dei approbatus est futurae Lonae voluntatis ejus ?
For that we may will, he willed it to be both his and ours: his by calling, ours by following. But what we shall have willed, he alone bestows: that is, the power to act well, and always to live blessedly. Nevertheless Esau, not yet born, could neither will nor be unwilling in any of these things. Why then, being placed in the womb, was he disapproved? For we return to those difficulties, more troublesome not only by their own obscurity, but also by our now many repetitions. Why indeed was Esau reprobated not yet born, who could neither believe him who calls, nor despise the calling, nor work anything good or evil? If by the foreknowledge of his future evil will, why was not Jacob also approved by the foreknowledge of God of his future good will?
因為我們立志一事,神願意這既屬乎他,也屬乎我們:藉呼召屬乎他,藉跟隨屬乎我們。但我們所立志的,唯有他能賜下:就是行善的能力,並永遠享福地活著。然而以掃尚未生下,在這些事上既不能立志,也不能不肯。那麼他既在母腹之中,為何被判為不合格呢?因為我們又回到那些難題,這些難題不僅因其本身的晦澀,且因我們如今屢次的重複而更令人煩擾。以掃尚未生下便被棄絕,究竟是為什麼呢?他既不能相信呼召者,也不能藐視呼召,更不能行任何善惡。若是憑對他將來惡意的預知,那麼雅各為何不也憑神對他將來善意的預知而蒙悅納呢?
1:297
Quod si semel concesseris potuisse quemquam vel approbari vel improbari ex eo quod nondum in illo erat, se.l quia Deus futurum esse præsciebat: convincitur enin. potuisse etiam ex operibus approbari, quae in illo Deus futura esse præsciebat, quamvis nondum esset aliquid operatus. et omnino te nihil adjuvabit, quod nondum nati erant, cum dictum esset: Major serviet minori: ut hic ostendas dictum non ex operibus, quia nondum quisquam erat operatus. Illa etiam verba si diligenter attendat, igitur non volentis, neque currentis scd miserentis est Dei: non hoc Apos:olus propterea tantum dixisse videbitur quod adjutorio Dei ad id quod volumus pervenimus:
But if once you have granted that anyone could be either approved or disapproved from that which was not yet in him, but because God foreknew that it would be: he is convicted, that is, he could also be approved from works, which God foreknew would be in him, although he had not yet done anything. And it will help you nothing at all that they were not yet born, when it was said: 'The elder shall serve the younger': so as to show thereby that it was said not of works, because no one had yet worked. Those words too, if he attend to them diligently, 'Therefore it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy': the Apostle will not seem to have said this only for the reason that we attain by God's help to that which we will:
但你若一旦承認,人可以憑那尚未在他裡面、卻是神所預知將要有的事,而蒙悅納或被棄絕:那麼他便被駁倒了,就是說,人也可以憑行為蒙悅納,就是神所預知將要在他裡面的行為,雖然他尚未做出任何事來。而「雙子尚未生下」對你毫無幫助,儘管當時說了「大的要服事小的」:好藉此顯明這話不是本於行為,因為尚無人做出任何行為。至於那話,若他細心留意:「這樣看來,這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神」——使徒說這話,看來不僅是為著我們藉神的幫助得著所願之事這緣故:
1:298
sed eliam et illa intentione qua et alio loco dicil; Cum timore et tremore vestram ipsorum salutem operamini. Deus eslenim qui operatur in vobis et velle et operari pro bona voluntate. Ubi satis ostendit, etiam ipsam bonam voluntatem in nobis operante Deo fieri. Nam si propterea solum dictum est: Non volentis neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei, quia volunus hominis sola non sufficit ut recte justequo vivamus, nisi adjuvemur misericordia Dei: potest et hoc modo dici: Igitur non miserentis est Dei, sed volentis est hominis: quia misericordia Dei sola non sufficit, nisi consensus nostræ voluntatis addatur. At illud manifetum est, frustra nos velle, nisi Deus misereatur.
but also with that intention with which he says in another place: 'Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. For it is God who works in you both to will and to work, according to his good will.' Where he sufficiently shows that even the good will itself comes to be in us by God working it. For if it were said 'Not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy' only for this reason, that the will of man alone does not suffice for us to live rightly and justly, unless we are helped by the mercy of God: it could also be said in this manner: 'Therefore it is not of God who shows mercy, but of man who wills': because the mercy of God alone does not suffice, unless the consent of our will be added. But that is manifest, that we will in vain, unless God have mercy.
更是帶著他在別處所說的那用意:「當恐懼戰兢,作成你們得救的工夫。因為你們立志行事,都是神在你們心裡運行,為要成就他的美意。」他在此充分顯明,連那良善的意願本身,也是神在我們裡面運行而成的。因為,若「不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神」這話僅是為此緣故而說的,就是單憑人的意志不足以使我們正直公義地生活,除非我們蒙神的憐憫幫助:那麼也可以這樣說:「這樣看來,這不在乎發憐憫的神,乃在乎那定意的人」:因為單憑神的憐憫也不足夠,除非加上我們意志的贊同。但那是明顯的,就是我們的立志乃是徒然,除非神施憐憫。
1:299
Illud autem nescio quomodo dicatur, frustra Deum misereri, nisi nos velimus. Si enim Deus miseretur, eliam volumus; ad eamdem quippe misericordiam pertinet, ut velimus. Deus est enim qui operatur in nobis et velle et operari pro bona voluntate. Nam si quaeramus utrum Dei donum sit voluntas bona, mirurosi negare quisquam audeat. At enim quia non praecedit voluntas bona vocationem, sed vocatio bonam voluntatem, propterea vocanti Deo recte tribuitur quod bene volumus. nobis vero tribui non potest quod vocamur. Non igitur ideo dictum putandum est: Non volentis, neque eorrentis, sed miserentis est Dei, quia nisi ejus adjutorio non possumus adipisci quod volumus:
But in what sense it can be said that God has mercy in vain unless we too are willing, I do not know. For if God has mercy, we are also willing; indeed, it belongs to that very mercy that we should will. For it is God who works in us both to will and to work according to good will. For if we should ask whether a good will is a gift of God, it would be astonishing if anyone dared to deny it. But because good will does not precede the calling, but the calling precedes good will, therefore it is rightly attributed to God who calls that we will well; yet it cannot be attributed to us that we are called. It must not, then, be supposed that the words 'It is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy' were said because, except by his aid, we cannot obtain what we will;
但要說「除非我們願意,否則神白白施憐憫」,我不知該如何理解。因為若神施憐憫,我們也就願意了;願意本就屬於這同一份憐憫。因為是神在我們裡面運行,使我們立志行事,都是為了成就祂的美意。若我們問「善的意志是否為神的恩賜」,倘若有人膽敢否認,那才叫人詫異。然而,因為善的意志並不在呼召之先,反倒是呼召在善的意志之先,所以我們之所以善願,正當地歸功於那呼召的神;但我們被呼召這件事卻不能歸功於我們自己。因此不可以為,「這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神」這句話,其意乃是:若非藉祂的幫助,我們便不能得著所願的;
1:300
sed ideo potius, quia nisi ejus vocatione non volumus. Sed si vocatio ista ita est effectrix bonae voluntatis, ut eam omnis vocatus sequItur, quomodo verum erit; Multi vocati, pauci elecii ? Quod si verum est, et consequenter vocationi vocatus obtemperat, atque ut non obtemperet in ejus est positum voluntate. recte etiam dici potest: Igitur non miseremis est Dei, sed volentis atque curretis homi nis: quia misericordia vocantis non sufficit, nisi vocationem obedientia consequatur. An forte illi quihoc modo vocati non sentiunt [Alias consentiunt, possint alio modo vocati accommodare fidei voluntatem: et illud verum sit: Multi vocati, pauci electi ?
but rather because, unless by his calling, we do not will at all. But if that calling is so productive of good will that every one who is called follows it, how will it be true that 'Many are called, but few are chosen'? For if this is true, and the one called consequently obeys the calling, and it lies within his own will not to obey, then it can also rightly be said: 'Therefore it is not of God that shows mercy, but of man that wills and runs,' since the mercy of him who calls does not suffice unless obedience follows the calling. Or is it perhaps that those who, called in this manner, do not perceive [others read: do not consent], might, if called in another manner, be able to bend their will to faith, and so that too be true: 'Many are called, but few are chosen'?
而毋寧是因為:除非藉祂的呼召,我們根本就不會願意。但若那呼召如此能生出善的意志,以致每個蒙召的人都跟從它,那麼「被召的多,選上的少」這話又怎能是真的呢?若這話為真,而被召者也隨之順從呼召,且不順從乃在乎他自己的意志,那麼也可以正當地說:「這不在乎發憐憫的神,只在乎那定意奔跑的人」,因為那呼召者的憐憫並不足夠,除非有順從隨著呼召而來。抑或許,那些以這種方式被召卻不領受〔另作:不同意〕的人,若以別的方式被召,便能使他們的意志順應於信德;如此那話也依然為真:「被召的多,選上的少」?
1:301
ut quamvis multi uno modo vocati sunt, tamen quia non omnes uno modo affecti sunt, illi soli sequantur vocationem, qui ei capiendae reperiantur idonei: et illud non minus verum sit: Igitur non volentis, neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei: quia hoc modo vocavit quo modo aptum erat eis qui secuti sunt vocationem. Ad alios autem vocatio quidem pervenit: sed quia talis fuit, qua moveri non possent, nec eam capere apti essent, vocati quidem dici poterunt, sed non electi: et non eliam similiter verum est: Igitur non miserentis Dei, sed volentis et currentis est hominis. Quoniam non potest effectus misericordiæ Dei esse in hominis potestate, ut frustra ille misereatur si homo nolit:
so that, although many are called in one and the same manner, yet because not all are affected in the same way, only those follow the calling who are found fit to receive it; and that this also be no less true: 'Therefore it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy,' because he called in a manner that was suited to those who followed the calling. But to others the calling did indeed come; yet because it was of such a kind that they could not be moved by it, nor were they fit to receive it, they can be said to be called, but not chosen. And likewise it is not equally true that 'Therefore it is not of God that shows mercy, but of man that wills and runs,' since the effect of God's mercy cannot be within man's power, so that God should have mercy in vain if man be unwilling;
如此,雖然許多人是以同一方式被召,然而因為並非人人都受同樣的感動,唯有那些被發現適於領受呼召的人才跟從呼召;而這話也同樣為真:「這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神」,因為祂是以適合那些跟從呼召之人的方式呼召他們。至於別人,呼召固然臨到了;但因那呼召的性質使他們無法被打動,他們也不適於領受它,所以他們固然可稱為被召的,卻非蒙揀選的。同樣,「這不在乎發憐憫的神,只在乎那定意奔跑的人」這話便不能同樣為真;因為神憐憫的果效不可能操在人手中,以致人若不願意,神就白白施了憐憫;
1:302
quia si velit etiam ipsorum misereri, opus sit ita vocare, quomodo illis aptum esset, a et moveremur. et intelligerent, et sequerentur. Verom est ergo: Multi vocati, pauci electi. Illi enim electi, qui congruenter vocati: illi autem qui non congruebant. neque contemperabant vocationi non electi, quia non secuti, quamvis vocati. Item verum est: Non volentis neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei: qui etiamsi multos vocet, eorum tamen miseretur quos ita vocat, quomodo vocari aptum est ut sequantur. Falsum est autem si quis dicit: Igitur non miserentis Dei, sed volentis atque currentis est hominis: quia nullius Deus frustra miseretur.
because if he should will to have mercy even on such men, it would be needful so to call them in the manner that was fitting for them, that we should be moved, and understand, and follow. It is therefore true: 'Many are called, but few are chosen.' For those are the chosen who were fittingly called; but those who were not in harmony with, nor complied with, the calling are the not-chosen, because they did not follow, though they were called. Likewise it is true: 'It is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy,' who, even though he call many, yet has mercy upon those whom he so calls that they are called in the manner fitting for them to follow. But it is false if anyone says: 'Therefore it is not of God that shows mercy, but of man that wills and runs,' because God has mercy upon no one in vain.
因為祂若願意連這等人也憐憫,就必須以適合他們的方式呼召他們,使我們被打動、明白並跟從。所以「被召的多,選上的少」這話是真的。因為那些蒙揀選的,乃是被合宜地呼召的人;而那些與呼召不相合、也不順應呼召的,就是未蒙揀選的,因為他們雖被召卻不跟從。同樣,「這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神」這話是真的;祂縱然呼召許多人,卻憐憫那些祂以適於他們跟從之方式所召的人。但若有人說「這不在乎發憐憫的神,只在乎那定意奔跑的人」,這話便是假的,因為神絕不白白憐憫任何人。
1:303
Cujus autem miseretur, sic eum vocat quomodo scit ei congruere, ut vocantem non respuat. Hic dicit aliquis: Cur ergo Esau non sic est vocatus, ut velit obedire ? Videmus enim alios aliter iisdem rebus demonstratis vel significatis, ad credendum moveri: sicut, exempli gratia, Simeon in Domlnum nostrum Jesuni Christum adhuc infantem parvulum credidit, Spiritu ei revelante cognoscens. Nathanael ad unam sententiam quam ab illo audivit: Priusquam te Philippus vocaret, cum esses sub arbore fici vidi te, respondil: Rabbi, tu es Ei ius Dei, tu es rex Israel. Quod tanto post quia confessus est Petros, meruit audire quod beatus sit, et quod ei darentur claves regni coelorum.
But him on whom he has mercy, he so calls as he knows to be fitting for him, that he may not spurn the one who calls. Here someone says: Why then was Esau not so called that he should be willing to obey? For we see that different men are moved to believe in different ways by the very same things when shown or signified: as, for example, Simeon believed in our Lord Jesus Christ while he was yet a little infant, recognizing him by the revelation of the Spirit. Nathanael, at one single saying which he heard from him, 'Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you,' answered: 'Rabbi, you are the Son of God, you are the King of Israel.' And because Peter, long afterward, confessed the same, he was counted worthy to hear that he was blessed, and that the keys of the kingdom of heaven would be given to him.
但祂所憐憫的人,祂便以祂所知適合他的方式呼召他,使他不致拒絕那呼召者。這裡有人問:那麼以掃為何沒有被這樣呼召,好叫他甘願順服呢?因為我們看見,不同的人在同樣的事物被顯明或表明時,會以不同方式被打動而相信:譬如,西面在我們的主耶穌基督還是嬰孩時就信了祂,藉聖靈的啟示認出祂來。拿但業一聽見祂所說的一句話「腓力還沒有招呼你,你在無花果樹底下,我就看見你了」,便回答說:「拉比,你是神的兒子,你是以色列的王。」彼得後來承認同樣的話,就得以聽見自己是有福的,且天國的鑰匙要交給他。
1:304
Miraculo facto in Cana Galilææ, quod initium signorum Evangelista commemorat, aqua in vinum conversa, crediderunt in eum discipuli ejus. Multos loquendo invitavit ad fidem, multi ncc suscitatis mortuis crediderunt. De cruce atque morte ejus conterriti etiam discipuli titubarunt, et tamen latro tunc credidit, cum eum non præstantiorem videcet in operibus, sed consortio crucis æqualem. Unus etiam de numero discipulorum post ejus resurrectionem, non tam viventibus membris, quam recentibus cicatricibus credidit. Multi ex eorum numero, a quibus crucifixus est, qui viventes eum miracula facientem contempserant, discipulis eum prædicantibus, et in nomine ejus talia facientibus crediderunt.
When the miracle was wrought in Cana of Galilee, which the Evangelist records as the beginning of signs, water being turned into wine, his disciples believed in him. He invited many to faith by his speaking; yet many did not believe even when the dead were raised. Terrified by his cross and death, even the disciples wavered, and yet the thief believed at that very time, when he saw him not more excellent in works, but his equal in the fellowship of the cross. One also of the number of the disciples believed after his resurrection, not so much by his living members as by his fresh scars. Many of the number of those by whom he was crucified, who while he lived had despised him as he worked miracles, believed when the disciples preached him and did such things in his name.
當在加利利的迦拿行了神蹟——福音書作者記為神蹟的頭一件,就是水變酒——祂的門徒就信了祂。祂以言語邀請許多人歸信;然而許多人縱然見死人復活也不信。因祂的十字架與死,連門徒也驚惶動搖,那強盜卻正在那時信了,那時他看祂在作為上並不更卓越,反倒在同釘十架的境遇上與己相等。門徒中也有一人在祂復活後才信,與其說是因祂活著的肢體,不如說是因祂新近的傷痕。在那釘祂十架的人當中,有許多在祂活著行神蹟時曾藐視祂,卻在門徒傳揚祂、奉祂的名行這樣的事時信了。
1:305
Cum ergo eliu, sic, alius autem sic tnoveatur ad fidem, eademque reS saepe alio modo dicta moveat, alio modo dicta non moveat, aliumque moveat, alium non moveat, quis audeat dicero defuisse Deo modum vocandi, quo etiam Esau ad eam fidem mentem applicaret, volunt temquc conjungeret, in qua Jacob justifica us est? Quod si tanta possit esse obstinatio voluntatis, ut contra omnes modos vocationis obdurescat mentis aversio, quæri.-; tur utrum de divina poena sii ipsa duritia. Cum enim Deus deserit non sic vocando, quomodo ad fidem moveri potest ? Quis enim dicat modum, quo ei persunderetur ut crederet, etiam Omnipotenti defuisse? Sed quid hoc quærimus, cum ipsum subjungat Apostolus?
Since, then, one man is moved to faith in this way, another in that, and the same thing spoken in one manner moves, while spoken in another manner it does not move, and moves one man while it does not move another, who would dare to say that God lacked a manner of calling by which he might have brought even Esau's mind to that faith, and joined his will to it, in which Jacob was justified? But if there can be so great an obstinacy of the will that the aversion of the mind grows hard against all manners of calling, it is asked whether that very hardness be of divine punishment. For when God deserts a man by not calling him thus, how can he be moved to faith? For who would say that a manner by which he might be persuaded to believe was lacking even to the Almighty? But why do we inquire this, when the Apostle himself adds it?
既然如此,一人以這方式被打動而信,另一人以那方式;同一件事以某種方式說出會打動人,以另一種方式說出卻不打動人,打動這人卻不打動那人;那麼誰敢說神竟缺乏一種呼召的方式,可以使連以掃的心也趨向雅各賴以稱義的那信德,並使他的意志與之聯合呢?但倘若意志的頑梗竟能大到使心思的抗拒硬抵一切呼召之方式,那就要問:這頑硬本身是否出於神的刑罰。因為當神不以那種方式呼召而撇棄人時,人怎能被打動而信呢?因為誰能說連全能者也缺乏一種可勸人相信的方式呢?但我們何必查究這事,既然使徒自己就加以說明了呢?
1:306
Dicit enim Scriptura Pharaoni: Quia ad hoc te excitavi, ut ostendam in te potentiam meam, et annuntietur nomen meum In universa terra. Hoc autem subjecit Apostolus documentum, quo probaret quod supra dixerat: Igitur non volentis, neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei. Tanquam diceret: Unde hoc doces? Dicit enim Scriptura Pharaeni: Quia ad hoc te excitavi, ut ostendam in te polentiam meam, et ut annuntietur nomen meum in universa terra ulique hic ostendetis, quod non volentis, neque currentis, sed inserentis cst Dei. Concludit itaque: Ergo cujus vult miseretur, et quem vult obdurat: cu;n superiuS non utrumque sit. Neque enim quomodo dictum est:
For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: 'For this very purpose have I raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.' Now the Apostle adjoined this proof to establish what he had said above: 'Therefore it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy.' As if he said: Whence do you teach this? For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: 'For this purpose have I raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth,' which certainly shows here that it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy. He therefore concludes: 'Therefore he has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens,' since above the two were not both stated. For it was not said in the same way,
因為經上對法老說:「我將你興起來,特要在你身上彰顯我的權能,並要使我的名傳遍天下。」使徒加上這個引證,是要證明他上面所說的:「這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神。」彷彿他說:你憑什麼這樣教導?因為經上對法老說:「我將你興起來,特要在你身上彰顯我的權能,並要使我的名傳遍天下」——這無疑在此顯明:這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神。於是他總結說:「這樣看來,神要憐憫誰就憐憫誰,要叫誰剛硬就叫誰剛硬。」因上文並未把兩者都提出。因為並非以同樣的方式說:
1:307
Non volentis, sed miserentis est Dei, sic etiam dictum est: Non volentis, neque currentis, sed obdurantis est Dei. Unde datur intelligi quod infra utrumque posuit: Ergo cujus vult uti eretur, et quem vult obdurat, ita sententiae superiori congruere posse, ut obduratio Dei sit velle. misereri: ut non ab illo irrogetur aliquid quo sit homo deterior: sed tantum quo sit melior, non derogelur. Quod si fit nulla distinctione meritorum, quis non irrumpat in cam vocem, quam sibi ipse objecit Apostolus: Dicis itaque mihi, quid adhuc conqueritur? nam voluntati ejus quis resistit ?
'It is not of him that wills, but of God that shows mercy,' as it was also said, 'It is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that hardens.' From which it is given to understand that what he set below—'Therefore he has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens'—can so agree with the earlier statement that the hardening by God be to be unwilling to have mercy; so that nothing be inflicted by him whereby a man becomes worse, but only that whereby he might become better be withheld. But if this be done without any distinction of merits, who would not break out into that cry which the Apostle himself set as an objection: 'You will therefore say to me, Why does he yet find fault? For who resists his will?'
「這不在乎那定意的,只在乎發憐憫的神」,卻並沒有以同樣方式說「這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎那叫人剛硬的神」。由此可知,他在下文所置的兩句——「這樣看來,神要憐憫誰就憐憫誰,要叫誰剛硬就叫誰剛硬」——能與上文之意如此相合,以致神的「叫人剛硬」乃是「不願施憐憫」:這樣,並非由祂施加什麼使人變得更壞,而只是不賜下那能使人變好的。但若這事沒有任何功德上的分別而發生,誰不會爆發出使徒自己所設的那反詰之聲:「這樣,你必對我說:祂為什麼還指責人呢?有誰能抗拒祂的旨意呢?」
1:308
Conqueritur enim Spiritus saepe de hominibus, sicut per innumerabiles apparet Scripturarum locos, quo.l nolint credere et recte viverc. Unde fideles, et facientes voluntatem Dei, conversari dicuntur sine querela, quod de illis non queratur Scriptura. Sed quid conqueritur, ait: Nam voluntati ejus quis resistit ? quandd cujus vult miseretur, et quem vult obdurat. Et tamen intucamur superiora; et inde nostram, quantum ipse Dominus adjuvat, sententiam dirigamus. Ait enim paulo anie: Quid etgo dicemus: Nunquid iniquitas est apud Deum ? Absit. Sit igitur hoc fixum atque immobile in mente sobria pietate atque stabili fide, quod nulla est iniquitas apud Deum.
For the Spirit often complains of men, as appears through innumerable passages of the Scriptures, because they are unwilling to believe and to live rightly. Whence the faithful, and those who do the will of God, are said to walk without complaint, because the Scripture does not complain of them. But why does he complain, he says: 'For who resists his will,' when he has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens? And yet let us look at what precedes, and thence let us direct our opinion, so far as the Lord himself helps. For he says a little before: 'What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.' Let this, then, be fixed and immovable in a mind of sober piety and steadfast faith, that there is no unrighteousness with God.
因為聖靈常為人抱怨,正如經文中無數處所顯明的,因他們不肯相信、不肯正直度日。因此,那些信實、遵行神旨意的人,被稱為無可指摘地行事為人,因為經上不為他們抱怨。但他說:祂為何抱怨呢?「有誰能抗拒祂的旨意呢?」既然祂要憐憫誰就憐憫誰,要叫誰剛硬就叫誰剛硬。然而,讓我們察看上文,並由此,就著主自己所賜的幫助,來校正我們的看法。因為他稍前說:「這樣,我們可說什麼呢?難道神有什麼不公平嗎?斷乎沒有。」那麼,願這在清明虔敬與堅定信德的心中確立不移:神絕無不公平。
1:309
Atque ita tenacissime firmissimeque credatur, idipsuM quod Deus cui vult miseretur et quem vult obdurat: lic cst, cujus vult miseretur, ct cujus non vult non miseretur, esse alicujus occultae, atque ab Inmano modulo impervestigabilis aequitatis, quæ et in ipsis rcbus humanis terrenisque contractibus animadvertenda est, in quibus nisi supernae justitiæ quædam impressa vestgia teneremus, nunquam in ipsum cubile ac penetrale castissimum atque sanc issimum spiritalium præceptorum nostrae infirmitatis susciperet atque inhiarct intentio. Beati qui esuriuht et sitiunt justitiam, quoniam ipsi saturabuntur.
And let it be most tenaciously and firmly believed that this very thing—that God has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens, that is, on whom he wills he has mercy, and on whom he wills not he has not mercy—belongs to a certain hidden equity, unsearchable by any human measure, which is to be observed even in human and earthly transactions themselves; for unless we held certain impressed traces of the supernal justice in these, the intention of our infirmity would never take up nor aspire toward the very couch and most chaste and most holy inner sanctuary of spiritual precepts. 'Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after justice, for they shall be filled.'
並且應當極堅牢、極穩固地相信這一件事——神要憐憫誰就憐憫誰,要叫誰剛硬就叫誰剛硬,也就是說,祂要憐憫誰就憐憫誰,不願憐憫誰就不憐憫誰——這乃屬於某種隱密、憑人的量度無從測透的公義;這公義甚至在人間、地上的往來交易中也可察見。因為在這些事上,我們若不持守著至高公義所烙下的某些印痕,我們軟弱的心志就永遠不會領受、也不會渴慕那屬靈誡命至潔至聖的內室與密處。「飢渴慕義的人有福了,因為他們必得飽足。」
1:310
In ista igitur siccitate vitae conditionisque moria'is, nisi aspergeretur desuper veltit tenuissima quædam aura justitiæ, citius aresceremus. Quapropter cum dando et accipiendo inter se hominum societas connectatur, dentur autem et accipiantur vel debita vel non debita, quis non videat iniquitatis argui neminem posse, qui quod sibi debetur exegerit, nec eum certe, qui quod ei debetur donare voluerit ? hoc autem non esse in eofum qui debitores sun', sed in ejus, ctii debetur, arbitrio. Hæc imago, vel, ut supra dixi, vestigium negotiis hominum de fastigio summo æquitatis impressum est. Sunt igitur omnes homines, quandoquidem, ut Apostolus ait:
In this drought, therefore, of our life and mortal condition, unless there were sprinkled from above, as it were, some most tenuous breeze of justice, we would too quickly wither. Wherefore, since human society is knit together among men by giving and receiving, and since things owed or not owed are both given and received, who does not see that no one can be convicted of injustice who exacts what is owed to him, nor certainly he who chooses to remit what is owed to him? but that this lies not within the discretion of those who are debtors, but of him to whom it is owed. This is the image, or, as I said above, the trace impressed upon the dealings of men from the loftiest height of equity. All men, then, are—since, as the Apostle says:
因此,在我們生命與必朽處境的這乾旱之中,若非從上頭灑下彷彿一縷至微的公義之氣,我們必更快枯乾。所以,既然人的社會是藉著施與受而彼此相連,且所欠的與不欠的都在施與受之列,誰看不出:凡索取自己應得之物的人不能被定為不義,那甘願免除別人所欠自己之物的人自然更不能被定為不義?而這事並不在乎欠債之人的裁奪,乃在乎那被欠者的裁奪。這便是那從公義至高之巔烙印在人間往來上的形象,或如我上文所說的印痕。那麼,眾人皆是——既然如使徒所說:
1:311
In Adam omnes moriuntur, a quo in universum genus humanum origo duci ur offensionis Dei, una quædam massa peccati, supplicium debens divinae summæque justitiæ: quod sive exigatur, sive donetur, nulla est iniquitas. A quibus autem exigendum et quibus donandum sit, supei be judicant debitores. Quemadmodum conducti ad illam vineam injuste indignati sunt, cum tantumdem:di s donaretur, quantum ipsis redderetur. Ideoque hujus impudentiæ quaestiones ita rctundit Apostolus: 0 homo, tu, quis es, qui respondens Deo? sic enim respondit Deo, cum hoc displicet, quod de peccatoribus conqueritur Deus:
'In Adam all die,' from whom the origin of offense against God is drawn down upon the whole human race—one certain lump of sin, owing punishment to the divine and supreme justice; which, whether it be exacted or remitted, there is no injustice. But from whom it should be exacted and to whom remitted, the debtors judge proudly. Just as those hired for that vineyard were unjustly indignant when as much was given to others as was rendered to themselves. And therefore the Apostle so blunts the questions of this shamelessness: 'O man, who are you that answer back to God?' For he does answer back to God when this displeases him, that God complains of sinners;
「在亞當裡眾人都死了」——罪之干犯神的源頭乃是由他傾流到全人類身上——就成了罪的一團,欠著那神聖至高公義的刑罰;這刑罰無論是被索取還是被免除,都沒有不義。至於當向誰索取、當向誰免除,欠債之人卻驕傲地妄加論斷。正如那受僱進葡萄園的人,見別人所得與自己所得的一樣多,便不義地忿忿不平。因此使徒如此挫折這種厚顏無恥的質問:「你這個人哪,你是誰,竟敢向神強嘴呢?」因為當人對「神為罪人抱怨」感到不悅時,他就是在向神強嘴;
1:312
quasi quemquam Deus peccare cogat, sed tantummodo quibusdam peccantibus misericordiam justificationis suæ non largiatur, et ob hoc dicatur obdurare peccantes quosdam, quia non eorum misereatur, non quia impellit ut peccent: corum autem non miseretur, quibus misericordiam non esse praebendam aequitate occultissima et ab humanis sensibus remotissima judicat. Inscrutabilia enim sunt judicia rjus, et invest gabiles viæ ejus. Conqueritur autem de peccatoribus, tanquam de iis quos ipSe peccare non cogit: simul etiam ut Ii, quorum miseretur, hancquoque habeant vocationem, ut dum conqueritur Deus de peccatoribus, compungantur corde, atque ad ejos gratiam convertantur.
as though God compelled anyone to sin, whereas he merely does not lavish the mercy of his justification upon certain sinners, and on this account is said to harden certain sinners, because he does not have mercy on them, not because he impels them to sin. But he has not mercy on those to whom, by an equity most hidden and most remote from human perceptions, he judges that mercy is not to be extended. For 'his judgments are unsearchable, and his ways past finding out.' But he complains of sinners as of those whom he himself does not compel to sin; and at the same time also so that those on whom he has mercy may have this calling too, that while God complains of sinners, they may be pricked in heart and be converted to his grace.
彷彿神強迫誰去犯罪似的;其實祂只是不將祂稱義的憐憫傾賜於某些罪人,故被說成使某些罪人剛硬,乃因祂不憐憫他們,而非因祂驅使他們去犯罪。祂不憐憫某些人,乃憑一種至隱密、至遠離人的知覺的公義,斷定憐憫不當施予他們。因為「祂的判斷何其難測,祂的蹤跡何其難尋!」祂為罪人抱怨,乃如同對待那些祂並不強迫犯罪之人;同時也是要叫那些蒙祂憐憫的人也得著這樣的呼召,好使他們在神為罪人抱怨時,心中扎痛,轉向祂的恩典。
1:313
Juste ergo conqueritur et misericorditcr. Sed si hoc movet, quod voluntati ejus nullus resistit, quia cui iuli, subvenit, et quem vult, deserit: cum et ille cui suhvenit, et ille quem deserit, ex eadem massa sint peccatorum, et quamvis debeant uterque supplicium, ab uno tamen exigitur, alteri donatur; si hoc ergo movet: Tu, quis es, qui respondeas Deo? Illud tantummodo inconcussa fide teneatur, quod non sit iniquitas apud Deum, qui sive donet, sive exigat debitum, nec ille a quo exigit, recte potest de iniquitate ejus cocqueri; ncc ille cui donat, debet de suis meritis gloriari. Et ille enim nisi quod d<;betur non reddet: et i!!e nonhabet nisi quod accepit.
Justly, then, and mercifully does he complain. But if this troubles you, that no one resists his will, because to whom he wills he brings aid, and whom he wills he deserts—since both he to whom he brings aid, and he whom he deserts, are of the same lump of sinners, and, although both owe punishment, yet from one it is exacted, to the other it is remitted—if, then, this troubles you: 'You, who are you that answer back to God?' Let only this be held with unshaken faith, that there is no unrighteousness with God, who, whether he remit or exact the debt, neither can he from whom he exacts it rightly complain of his injustice, nor ought he to whom he remits it to glory in his own merits. For the one will render nothing but what is owed; and the other has nothing but what he received.
所以祂的抱怨既公義又滿有憐憫。但若這事使你困惑——沒有人能抗拒祂的旨意,因為祂樂意幫助誰就幫助誰,樂意撇棄誰就撇棄誰;而那受祂幫助的與那被祂撇棄的,同出於罪人的一團,二者雖都該受刑罰,卻向一人索取,向另一人免除——若這事使你困惑:「你這個人哪,你是誰,竟敢向神強嘴呢?」只願以不動搖的信心持守這一點:神絕無不義;祂無論免除還是索取所欠的,那被索取的既不能正當地控告祂不義,那蒙免除的也不當以自己的功德誇口。因為前者不過償還所欠的;後者所有的,無非是所領受的。
1:314
Etenim obduratio illa impiorum utrumque demonstrat, et quid timendum sit, ut quique pietate convertatur ad Deum, et quantæ agendae siut gratiæ misericordiæ Dei, qui in aliorum poena quid aliis donet bstendit. Si autem i la quam de aliis exigit non est justa pæna, nihil donat aliis a quibus eam non exigit. Quia vero illa justa cst, et nulla est iniquitas apud vindicantem Deum, quis sufficiat agere gratias ei, qui hoc remittit, quod si velit exigere, remo se recte diceret non debere 9 Quos et vocavit: Nos, inquit, non solum ex Judæis, sed etiam ex gentibus; id est, vasa misericordhe quæ præparavit in gloriam. Non enim omnes Jud i os, sed ex Judæis;
For indeed that hardening of the impious demonstrates both things: what is to be feared, so that each one may by piety be converted to God, and how great thanks are to be rendered for the mercy of God, who in the punishment of some shows what he bestows upon others. But if that which he exacts of some is not a just penalty, he bestows nothing upon the others of whom he does not exact it. But because that penalty is just, and there is no unrighteousness with God who takes vengeance, who could suffice to give thanks to him who remits this which, if he willed to exact it, no one could rightly say he did not owe? 'Whom also he called': 'Us,' he says, 'not only from among the Jews, but also from among the Gentiles'; that is, the vessels of mercy which he prepared unto glory. For not all the Jews, but of the Jews;
因為那不敬虔者的剛硬確實顯明兩件事:一是當懼怕的事,好叫各人藉虔敬轉向神;二是當為神的憐憫獻上何等大的感謝,祂在對某些人的刑罰中,顯明祂賜給別人的是何等恩典。但若祂向某些人所索取的不是公義的刑罰,那祂對那些不加索取的人便毫無賞賜。然而因那刑罰是公義的,且施行報應的神絕無不義,那麼誰能夠向那位免除此刑罰的神獻上足夠的感謝呢——這刑罰祂若願意索取,無人能正當地說自己不欠?「就是祂所召的」:他說,「不但是從猶太人中,也是從外邦人中」;這就是祂預備得榮耀的憐憫的器皿。因為不是所有猶太人,乃是從猶太人中間;
1:315
nec omnes omnino homines genium, sed ex gentibus. Una est enim ex Adam massa peccatorum et impiorum, in qua Judaei et gentes, remota gratia Dei, ad unam pertinent conspersionem. Si enim figulus luti ex eadem tonspersione facit aliud vas in honorem, aliud in contumeliam, manifestum est autem quod ex Judæis alia vasa sunt in honorem; alia in contumeliam, sicut ex gentibus: sequitur ut ad unam conspersionem omnes pertinere intelligantur. Si fuerit, inquit, numerus filiorum Israel quasi arena mar s, reliquiæ salvæ fient. Cætera ergo turba, v sa perleeta ad perditionem. Verbum enim consummans et brevians, inquit, faciet Domiuus super terram:
nor absolutely all men of the Gentiles, but of the Gentiles. For there is one lump of sinners and of the impious from Adam, in which Jews and Gentiles, apart from the grace of God, belong to one same mass. For if the potter of clay makes from the same mass one vessel unto honor, another unto dishonor, it is manifest that from among the Jews some vessels are unto honor, others unto dishonor, just as from among the Gentiles: it follows that all are understood to belong to one mass. 'If the number of the sons of Israel be,' he says, 'as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved.' The rest, therefore, of the crowd are vessels drawn out unto perdition. 'For a word consummating and abridging,' he says, 'the Lord shall make upon the earth':
也不是全然所有的外邦人,乃是從外邦人中間。因為從亞當而來,罪人與不敬虔者只有一團;在其中,除了神的恩典之外,猶太人與外邦人同屬一團。因為若窯匠從同一團泥裡造這個作為貴重的器皿,那個作為卑賤的,那麼顯然:從猶太人中間有些器皿作為貴重的,有些作為卑賤的,正如從外邦人中間也是如此;由此可見,眾人都被理解為同屬一團。他說:「以色列人雖多如海沙,得救的不過是剩下的餘數。」所以其餘的眾人乃是被劃歸沉淪的器皿。他說:「因為主要在地上成全並速成祂的話語」:
1:316
id est, ut compendio fideoi per gratiam salvos faciat credentes: non per innumerabiles observationes, quibas illa multitudo serviliter onerata premebatur. Per gratiam quippe nobis verbum consummans et brevians fecit super terram. dicens: Jugum meum suave est et sarcina mea levis est. Quod et paulo post hic dicitur: Prope est verbum in ore tuo et in corde tuo: hoc est verbum fidei quod prædicamus: quia si confitearis in ore tuo, quia Deus illum suscitavit a mortuis, salvus eris. Corde enim creditUr ad justitiam; ore autem confessio fit ad salutem. Hoc est verbum consummans et brevians, quod fecit Deus super terram:
that is, that by the summary of faith through grace he may save those who believe; not through the innumerable observances by which that multitude was servilely burdened and oppressed. For by grace has the word consummating and abridging done this for us upon the earth, saying: 'My yoke is easy, and my burden is light.' Which is also said a little after here: 'The word is near, in your mouth and in your heart: this is the word of faith which we preach; that if you confess with your mouth that God raised him from the dead, you shall be saved. For with the heart one believes unto justice, but with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.' This is the word consummating and abridging, which God made upon the earth;
就是說,祂要藉著信德的精要、透過恩典,拯救那些相信的人;而非藉那使那群人如奴僕般被壓負的無數繁文縟節。因為那成全並速成的話語,正是藉恩典在地上為我們成就了這事,說:「我的軛是容易的,我的擔子是輕省的。」這話在此稍後也說到:「這話與你相近,就在你口裡,在你心裡,這就是我們所傳信主的話。你若口裡認神叫祂從死裡復活,就必得救。因為人心裡相信就可以稱義,口裡承認就可以得救。」這就是神在地上所成就的、那成全並速成的話語;
1:317
qua consummatione atque brevitate Id ro justificatus est, qui defixis in cruce omnibus membriS, et babens libera hæc duo, corde credidit ad justitiam, ore confessus est ad salutem, statimque audire meruit: Hodie mecum eris in paradiso. Consequerentur enim bona opera ejus, si per epta gratia diu inter homines viveret. Nec tamen ea præcesserant, ut eamdem gratiam mereretur, ex latrocinio fixus in crucem, et cruce in paradisum translatus. Et sicut prædixit, Inquit, Isaias: NiSi Dominus Sabaoth reliquisset nobis semen, sicut Sodomd facti eSsemus, et sicut Gomorrha similes fuissemus. Quod hie ait, Reliquisset nobis semen: hoc ibi: Reliquiæ solvæ fient.
by which consummation and brevity that man too was justified who, with all his limbs fastened to the cross, and having these two free, believed with the heart unto justice, and confessed with the mouth unto salvation, and forthwith was counted worthy to hear: 'Today you shall be with me in paradise.' For his good works would have followed, if, having received grace, he had lived long among men. Yet they had not preceded, so that he should merit that same grace, being fastened to the cross out of brigandage, and from the cross translated into paradise. 'And as Isaiah foretold,' he says, 'Unless the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we had become as Sodom, and been made like unto Gomorrah.' What here he says, 'had left us a seed,' is there: 'a remnant shall be saved.'
藉這成全與精簡,連那人也得以稱義——他的一切肢體都釘在十字架上,只有這兩樣是自由的:心裡相信以致稱義,口裡承認以致得救,隨即就配聽見:「今日你要同我在樂園裡了。」因為他的善行本應隨後而來,若他領受恩典後在人間久活的話。然而善行並未先於恩典,使他配得那同樣的恩典;他本是因劫盜而被釘十架,卻從十架被遷入樂園。他說:「又如以賽亞先前所預言的:若不是萬軍之主給我們存留餘種,我們早已像所多瑪、蛾摩拉的樣子了。」他在此所說的「給我們存留餘種」,就是那裡所說的「得救的不過是剩下的餘數」。
1:318
Caeteri autem perditionis vasa debito supplicio perferunt. Et non omnes perisse sicut Sodoma et Gomorrha, non meritum eorum feeit, sed gratia Dei relinquentis se. men, unde alia messis toto orbe consurgeret. Hoc et paulo post: Sic ergo, inquit, et in hoc tempore reliquiæ per electionem gratiæ salvæ factæ sunt. Si autem gratia, jam non ex operibus: alioquin gratia jam non est gratia. Quid ergo? quod quærebat Israel, hoc non est consecutus, electio autem consecuta est, cæteri vero excaecati sunt. Consecuta sum vasa misericordix, excæcata sunt vasa itæ: ex eadem tamen consperstone.
But the rest, the vessels of perdition, undergo their due punishment. And that not all perished like Sodom and Gomorrah, this was not their merit, but the grace of God who left them a seed, whence another harvest might spring up throughout the whole world. This too a little after: 'So then,' he says, 'even at this present time there is a remnant according to the election of grace. And if by grace, then it is no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace.' What then? What Israel sought, this it has not obtained; but the election has obtained it, and the rest were blinded. The vessels of mercy have obtained it; the vessels of wrath were blinded: yet from the same mass.
至於其餘的,就是沉淪的器皿,承受他們應得的刑罰。而他們沒有全然像所多瑪、蛾摩拉那樣滅亡,這並非出於他們的功德,乃是那給他們存留餘種之神的恩典,好叫別的莊稼得以在全地生起。這在稍後也說到:他說:「如今也是這樣,照著揀選的恩典,還有所留的餘數。既是出於恩典,就不在乎行為;不然,恩典就不是恩典了。」這卻怎麼樣呢?以色列人所求的,他們沒有得著;惟有蒙揀選的得著了,其餘的就成了頑梗不化的。憐憫的器皿得著了,忿怒的器皿成了瞎眼的:然而都出於同一團。
1:319
Quis enim discutiet opera Domini ex oadem conspersione unum damnantis, alterum justificantia' Liberum voluntatis arbitrium plurimum valet: imo verum est quidem, sed in venundatis sub peccato quid valet? Caro, inquit, 'concupiscit adverSUI spiritum, spiritus adversus carnem: ut non ea quae vultis faciatis. Praecipitur ut recte vivamus, hac utique mercede proposita, ut in aeternum beate vivere mereamur. Sed quis potest recte vivere, et bene operari, nisi justificatus ex fide? Praecipitur ut credamus, ut dono accepto Spiritus sancti, per dilectionem bene operari possimus. Sed quis potest credere, nisi aliqua vocatione, hoc est, aliqua rerum testificatione tangatur ?
For who shall discuss the works of the Lord, who from the same mass condemns one and justifies another? Free choice of the will avails much: nay, this is indeed true, but among those sold under sin, what does it avail? 'The flesh,' he says, 'lusts against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh, so that you do not do the things that you would.' It is commanded that we live rightly, with this reward set before us, that we may merit to live blessedly in eternity. But who can live rightly and work well, unless justified by faith? It is commanded that we believe, so that, having received the gift of the Holy Spirit, we may through love be able to work well. But who can believe, unless he be touched by some calling, that is, by some testimony of things?
因為誰能評斷主的作為呢——祂從同一團裡定這人的罪,卻稱那人為義?意志的自由抉擇大有能力:不錯,這固然是真的,但在那賣於罪之下的人中間,它又有何用呢?他說:「情慾和聖靈相爭,聖靈和情慾相爭,使你們不能做所願意做的。」我們奉命正直度日,並有這賞賜擺在面前,就是我們可配得在永恆中蒙福地活著。但誰能正直度日、行善,除非藉信稱義呢?我們奉命相信,好使我們既領受聖靈的恩賜,便能藉著愛心行善。但誰能相信,除非藉某種呼召,就是藉某種事物的印證,被觸動呢?
1:320
Quis habet in potestate tali visu attingi mentem suam, quo ejus voluntas moveatur ad fidem? Quis autem animo amplectitur aliqtiid, quod eum non delectat? Aut quis habet in potestate, ut vel occurrat, quod eum delectare possit, vel deleclet cum occurrerit? Cum ergo nos ea delectant quibus proficiamus ad Deum, inspiratur hoc, et praebetur gratia Dei, non nutu nostro et industria, aut operum mer tis comparatur: quia ut sit motus voluntatis, ut sit industria studii, ut sinf opera charitate ferventia, ille tribuit, ille largitur. Petere jubemur, ut accipiamus: quaerere, ut inveniamus: et pulsare, ut aperiatur nobis;
Who has it in his power that his mind be touched by such a vision as would move his will to faith? And who embraces in his soul anything that does not delight him? Or who has it in his power that there should even present itself something able to delight him, or that it should delight him when it presents itself? When, therefore, those things delight us by which we advance toward God, this is inspired, and the grace of God is furnished, not procured by our own nod and industry, or by the merit of works; for that there be a movement of the will, that there be industry of zeal, that there be works fervent with charity, he grants, he lavishes. We are bidden to ask, that we may receive; to seek, that we may find; and to knock, that it may be opened to us;
誰能操縱自己的心思,使它被那能感動意志歸信的異象所觸動呢?又有誰能在心中懷抱那不使他喜悅之物呢?或誰能操縱使那能使他喜悅之物向他呈現,或使它呈現時他就得喜悅呢?因此,當那些使我們向神長進的事物使我們喜悅時,這乃是受了感動,是神的恩典所供給的,並非藉我們自己的意向與努力、或藉行為的功德所換取的;因為意志的活動、熱心的努力、以愛火熾燃的善行,都是祂所賜、祂所豐賜的。我們奉命祈求,就得著;尋找,就尋見;叩門,就給我們開門;
1:321
Nonne aliquando ipsa oratio nostra sic lepida est, vel potius frigida et pene nulla, ut neque hoc in nobis cum dolore advertamus? quia si vel hoc dolemus, jam otamus. Quid ergo aliud ostenditur nobis, nisi quia et petere, et quærere, et pulsare ille concedit, qui hæc ut faciainus jubet. Igitur non volentis, neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei: quandoquidem nec velle, nec currere, nisi eo monente atque excitante, poterimus. Quod si electio fit aliqua, ut sic intelligamus quod dictum est:
Is not our very prayer sometimes so listless, or rather cold and almost nothing, that we do not even advert to this in ourselves with sorrow? For if we even grieve at this, we are already praying. What else, then, is shown to us, except that both to ask, and to seek, and to knock is granted by him who bids that we do these things? 'Therefore it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy,' since we can neither will nor run except by his admonishing and rousing us. But if some election takes place, so that we should understand what was said,
難道我們的禱告有時不是如此的萎靡,或說是冷淡而近乎烏有,以致我們連自己心中這光景都不曾憂傷地覺察嗎?因為我們若連這事都憂傷,就已經是在禱告了。那麼向我們所顯明的,豈不正是:祈求、尋找、叩門,都是那吩咐我們行這些事的主所賜的嗎?「這不在乎那定意的,也不在乎那奔跑的,只在乎發憐憫的神」,因為若非祂的提醒與激動,我們既不能定意,也不能奔跑。但若有某種揀選發生,好使我們如此理解那話所說的:
1:322
Reliquiæ per electionem gratia salvæ factæ Sunt, non ut justificatorum electio fiatau vitam aeternam, sed ut eligantur qui justificentur, certe ha occulta est electio, ut in eadem conspersione nobis prorsus apparere non possit, aut si apparet quibusdam, ego in hac r6 infirmitatem meam fateor. Non enim habeo quod intuear in eligendis hominibus ad gratiam salutarem, si ad examen hujus electionis aliqua cogitatione permittor, nisi vel majus ingentium, vel minora peccata, vel utrumque i addamus etiam, si placet, bonestas utilesque doctr;nas.
'A remnant was saved according to the election of grace'—not that there is an election of the already justified unto eternal life, but that those be chosen who are to be justified—surely this election is so hidden that in the same mass it cannot at all appear to us; or, if it appears to certain persons, I in this matter confess my own weakness. For I have nothing to look upon in choosing men unto saving grace, if I am permitted by some thought to submit this election to examination, except either greater talents, or lesser sins, or both—let us add too, if you please, honest and useful learning.
「照著揀選的恩典,還有所留的餘數」——並非說有一種對已稱義之人歸入永生的揀選,乃是說揀選那些將要被稱義的人——這揀選確是如此隱密,以致在同一團中對我們毫不顯明;或者,即便它向某些人顯明,我在這事上也承認自己的軟弱。因為在揀選人歸入使人得救的恩典這事上,倘若我被容許以某種思量將這揀選付諸查考,我實在無所著眼,無非是:或較大的天賦,或較小的罪,或二者兼有——若你願意,我們甚至再加上高尚而有益的學問。
1:323
Quisquis ergo fuerit quam minimis peccatis irretitus atque maculatus (nam nullis quis potesi?), et acer ingenio, et liberalibus artibus expolitus, eligendus videtur ad gratiam. Sed cum hoc statuero, ita me fidebit ille qui infirma mundi elegit, ut confundat fortia, et stulta mundi, ut confundat sapientes: ut eum intuens et pudore correctus, ego irrideam multos, et prae quibusdam peccatoribus castiores, ei prae quibusdam piscatoribus oratores. Nonne advertimus multos fideles nostros ambulantes viam Dei; ex nulla parte ingenio comparari: nOn dicam quorumdam hæreticorum, sed etiam mimorum?
Whoever, then, shall be ensnared and stained with the fewest sins (for who can be with none?), and keen in talent, and polished with liberal arts, seems to be one to be chosen unto grace. But when I have determined this, he who chose the weak things of the world to confound the strong, and the foolish things of the world to confound the wise, so confounds me, that, gazing upon him and corrected by shame, I laugh at myself for deriding many, and preferring men more chaste than certain sinners, and orators before certain fishermen. Do we not notice many of our faithful walking in the way of God who are in no respect to be compared in talent—I will not say to certain heretics, but even to actors?
那麼,凡沾染玷污最少之罪的人(因為誰能全無罪呢?),又天資敏銳、以博雅之學為妝飾的,似乎就是當被揀選歸入恩典的。但當我如此斷定時,那揀選了世上軟弱的以羞辱那剛強的、揀選了世上愚拙的以羞辱那智慧的主,卻如此使我羞愧,以致我仰望祂、被羞恥所糾正,便嘲笑自己竟譏誚許多人,竟看某些罪人為不如某些較貞潔者、看某些漁夫為不如雄辯家。難道我們沒有注意到,許多在神的道路中行走的信徒,在天資上絕不能相比——我不說比不上某些異端,甚至比不上優伶嗎?
1:324
Item nonne videmus quosdam homines utriusque sexus, in conjugali castitate viventes sine querela, et tamen vel hæreticos, vel praganos, vel etiam in vera fide et vera Ecclesia sic tepidos, ut eos mire iur meretricum et histrionum subito conversorum non sotum patlentia et temperantia, sed etiam fide, spe, et charitate superari? Restat ergo, ut voluntates eligantur: sed voluntas ipsa, nisi aliquid occurrerit, quod delectet atque invitet animum, moveri nullo modo potest. Hoc autem ut occurrat, non est in hominis potestate. Quid volebat Saulus, nisi invadere, trahere, vincire, neeare Christianos? quam rabida voluntas, quam furiosa, quam caeca!
Likewise, do we not see certain men of either sex living without complaint in conjugal chastity, and yet either heretics, or pagans, or even so lukewarm in the true faith and true Church, that we marvel to see them surpassed—by harlots and stage-players suddenly converted—not only in patience and temperance, but even in faith, hope, and charity? It remains, therefore, that the wills are chosen; but the will itself can in no way be moved unless something present itself which delights and invites the mind. But that this should present itself is not in man's power. What did Saul will but to invade, drag off, bind, slay Christians? How rabid a will, how furious, how blind!
同樣,難道我們沒有看見某些男女在夫妻的貞潔中無可指摘地生活,卻或是異端,或是外邦人,或甚至在真信仰與真教會中如此不冷不熱,以致我們驚異地見他們竟被那些忽然悔改的娼妓與伶人所勝過——不但在忍耐與節制上,甚至在信、望、愛上?因此餘下的結論便是:所揀選的乃是意志;但意志本身,除非有什麼使心思喜悅並吸引它之物呈現,斷不能被打動。而使這事呈現,卻不在人的能力之內。掃羅所願的,豈不是闖入、拉扯、捆綁、殺害基督徒麼?何等狂暴的意志,何等瘋狂,何等瞎眼!
1:325
Qui tamen una desuper voce prosiratus, occurrente utique tali visu, quo mens illa et voluntas, refracta sævitia, retorqueretur et corrigeretur ad fidem; repente ex EvangeIii mirabili persecutore, mirabalior prædicator effectus est. Et tamen quid dicimus? Nunquid iniquitas est apud Deum? exigentem a quo placet, donantem cui placet: qui nequaquam exigit indebitum, nequaquam donat alienum. Nunquid iniquitas est apud Deum ? A I'sit. Quare tamen huic ita, et huic non ita? O homo, tu quis es? debitum si non reddis, habes quod gratuleris: si reddis, non habes quod querairis. Credamus tantum.
Yet he, prostrated by one voice from above, when there presented itself such a vision as would, with his savagery broken, turn back and correct that mind and will unto faith, was suddenly, out of a marvelous persecutor of the Gospel, made a still more marvelous preacher of it. And yet what do we say? Is there unrighteousness with God, who exacts from whom it pleases him, and gives to whom it pleases him—who by no means exacts what is not owed, by no means gives what is another's? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. Yet why to this man thus, and to that man not thus? O man, who are you? If you do not render the debt, you have cause to rejoice; if you render it, you have no cause to complain. Let us only believe,
然而他被從天上來的一個聲音擊倒,那時呈現了這樣一個異象,使他的兇暴被折服,那心思與意志被扭轉、被糾正歸向信德;於是他忽然從福音的一個駭人的逼迫者,變成了福音更駭人的傳講者。然而我們又說什麼呢?難道神有不義嗎——祂樂意向誰索取就索取,樂意賜給誰就賜給,且絕不索取那不欠的,絕不賜給那屬別人的?難道神有不義嗎?斷乎沒有。然而為何待這人如此,待那人卻不如此?你這個人哪,你是誰?你若不償還所欠的,你就有可歡喜的;你若償還了,你就無可抱怨的。我們只要相信,
1:326
etsi capere non valeamus, quoniam qui universam creaturam, et spirilalcm ei corporalcm, fecit et condidit, omnia in numero, et pondere, et mensura disponit: sed inscrotahilia sunt judicia ejus, et investigabiles viae rjus. Dicamus alleluia, et collaudemus canticum, et non dicamus; quid hoc? aut quid liic? Omnia enim in tempore suo creata sunt.
even though we are not able to comprehend it, since he who made and founded the whole creation, both spiritual and corporeal, disposes all things in number, and weight, and measure; but his judgments are unsearchable, and his ways past finding out. Let us say Alleluia, and together sing the song, and let us not say: Why this? or, Why here? For all things were created in their own time.
縱然我們不能參透,因為那位造成並奠立全部受造之物——無論屬靈的還是有形的——的主,將萬事都按數目、重量與尺度安排;但祂的判斷難測,祂的蹤跡難尋。讓我們說「哈利路亞」,一同歌唱這詩歌,且不要說:為何這樣?或為何在此?因為萬物都按其時被造。
ch. 2 →
1234567891011121314151617181920212223