CHAPTER ONE. 'Paul'—that is, small and least; from Saul, Paul, just as Abram became Abraham, so that even in his very name he might be new. 'A servant of Jesus Christ.' So Isaiah says: 'It is a great thing for thee to be called my servant.' 'Called an apostle.' Already in foreknowledge called and predestined to this, that he should be an apostle. 'Set apart.' As it says in the Acts of the Apostles: 'Set apart for me Paul and Barnabas for the work to which I have chosen them.' 'Unto the Gospel of God, which he had promised beforehand.' The Gospel is called good tidings; and what greater good than that Christ, born and having suffered, has risen again for us? 'Through his prophets in the holy Scriptures, concerning his Son, who was made to him.'
To nourish the faith of the Jews, he asserts that he preaches that One whom the prophets announced in the holy Scriptures. This whole passage tells against the Manichaeans, who say that the God of the prophets is one and the God of the New Testament another. 'Of the seed of David.' Of Mary, who came from the stock of David, as Isaiah said: 'Behold, a virgin shall conceive in the womb and shall bear a son.' 'According to the flesh.' And this crushed Photinus, and him who says he is a mere man, not understanding that in Christ there are two substances. 'Who was predestined the Son of God in power, according to the spirit of sanctification, by the resurrection of the dead of Jesus Christ our Lord.'
He was predestined to rise before all and to open to the sons of God the way of resurrection, so that as the head, so also his body might rise. 'Through whom we have received grace and apostleship unto the obedience of faith among all the nations.' Grace, that we might believe and be baptized, and because he himself was already justified freely by no merits of his own. But apostleship he received when he was sent to preach to the nations. 'For his name.' We discharge the office in place of his name, as he himself says: 'As the Father sent me, so I send you'; and, 'We act as ambassadors for Christ.' 'Among whom are you also, called of Jesus Christ.' And among you Romans also we received apostleship, as among all the nations. 'To all who are at Rome, beloved of God.'
'To all the faithful of God who are at Rome, called to be saints.' Sanctified by the calling of God and by grace, not by the merits of their own works. 'Grace to you.' Such is his greeting everywhere, that he both recalls the benefits of God and desires that they remain whole in us, because our sins have been forgiven us freely, not by our merits. 'And peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.' As he says to the Colossians: 'He has made peace over all things which are in heaven and which are on earth, through his blood,' and those whom he has redeemed he wills to live peaceably. 'First indeed I give thanks to my God through Jesus Christ.' Because by nature he is the God of all, but by desert and will the God of few, therefore he said 'my God.' 'For you all.' Not for the Jews only.
'Because your faith is proclaimed throughout the whole world.' He praises subtly, so as to spur them to progress. And truly the faith of the Romans is everywhere renowned. He says 'your faith,' calling the faith theirs, which without doubt is God's and was infused into them by God; but the custom of Scripture holds this, as in the Gospel the Lord says: 'Is it not written in your law, I said, You are gods?' Or that: 'As it is written in their law, They hated me without cause'; and elsewhere: 'Does our law judge any man without a hearing?' So then their faith is spoken of, just as their law, though no one is ignorant that the law is from God, as is faith also. 'For God is my witness, whom I serve in my spirit, in the Gospel of his Son.'
That is, whom I serve with my whole heart in ready devotion and full sincerity. 'That without ceasing I make mention of you, always in my prayers beseeching.' Here he shows that he will say everything with love, so that he may be heard by them the more gladly, and he gives an example of praying without ceasing. 'If by any means at length I may have a prosperous journey, by the will of God, to come to you. For I long to see you, that I may impart to you some spiritual grace.'
Otherwise too I have no prosperous journey, unless the will of God—which knows all things, and goes before us and precedes and cherishes us in all good things—should direct me thither where I may have some fruit; as we read of the apostles, that when they wished to go to one place they were destined for another, and did not go where they wished, but where God had sent them, knowing when and to whom they ought to go. 'To confirm you.' Here he shows in what manner he praised them above—those who still need spiritual grace for their confirming. 'That is, that I may be comforted together in you through that faith which is mutually yours and mine.' That through the common faith we may be mutually comforted, and may mutually rejoice at the illumination of the Holy Spirit.
'For I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that I have often purposed to come to you.' For through the brethren coming and going you could have heard of my intention. 'And have been hindered until now.' That is, occupied while I preach in other provinces, or hindered by revelation, or perhaps, as he says elsewhere: 'Satan hindered us.' 'That I might have some fruit among you also.' He calls the reward of his labor 'fruit.' 'As also among the other nations, both Greeks and barbarians.' Understand 'I have.' 'I am debtor to the wise and to the foolish.' By 'wise' he means the Greeks, among whom is all philosophy; by 'foolish' he calls the barbarians. 'So, as much as is in me, ready.' It is prepared in me. 'To preach the Gospel to you also who are at Rome.' Equally as to the wise Greeks.
'For I am not ashamed of the Gospel.' This subtly pertains to the censure of the pagans, who deservedly ought to be ashamed of their incestuous gods, yet are not ashamed to believe their god Jupiter, and think it a thing to be ashamed of to believe the Lord crucified for the salvation of his own image—whereas in the one is disgrace, in the other is the mark of virtue. And it is against those who deny Christ in the flesh, and are ashamed of the nativity and the cross of the Lord, who think these things unworthy of God, not understanding that nothing is more worthy of God than what avails for human salvation. For if to unbelievers it is folly, yet to believers it is the power of God and the wisdom of God. 'For it is the power of God unto salvation.'
There is no greater power than, death being overcome, to restore to man the life he had lost—although the weakness, that is the humanity, in the power, that is in the divinity, may seem incredible to unbelievers. 'To everyone who believes, to the Jew first and to the Greek; for the righteousness of God is revealed in it.' That, just as Abraham believing was saved from among the nations through faith, so also the rest who believe may be saved. 'From faith unto faith, as it is written: But the just shall live by my faith.' By the faith of the Old Testament the Jew is justified, by that of the New the Gentile, since the Jew believes that the prophecies foretold this beforehand. Again, otherwise: from present faith unto future, because faith pertains to things invisible, which was infused as a gift of God both under the Old Testament and in the New. And therefore he says:
'But the just shall live by my faith. For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven.' He speaks against the party of the Gentiles, and says that God's wrath is revealed through the Gospel. For men had known to expect both benefits and plagues from the heavens. 'Against all impiety and injustice of men.' The first impiety is against God, to sin either by blasphemy or by contempt. Another is against parents, either by injury or by scorn. A third is against the stranger, since everything contrary to piety is impiety. A fourth is against one's own self, as Wisdom says: 'But those who sin against me do impiously against their own souls.' Or 'all impiety,' because the cults of idols are diverse—so that impiety refers to injury against God, injustice to all sins.
'Of those who hold the truth in injustice.' Who hold the truth of God's name in the injustice of the unworthy matter of idols. 'Because that which is known of God is manifest in them.' Every creature shows itself not to be God, but that there is another who made it, whom it is necessary to obey in service; for it can naturally know of God that he exists, and that he is just, and that the creature itself is not from itself, because there is none greater through all things than all, since all mutually surpass one another—some in magnitude, as the heaven; others in brightness, as the sun and the moon or the resplendent stars. 'For God has manifested it to them.' His hidden powers are made manifest from those things which are plain.
'For his invisible things, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made.' For if the things which are seen are so resplendent, made by him that some thought them gods, how much more could they have understood the eternal Maker? 'His eternal power also and divinity, so that they are inexcusable.' Therefore Christ is eternal, since he is the power of God and the wisdom of God. 'Because, when they had known God.' How did they know him? Either from conscience through the reason implanted in them, or from the fashioning of the world, because all things are mutable, God alone unchangeable. 'They did not glorify him as God.' They did not venerate him through his own greatness, but worshiped idols in place of God. 'Or give thanks.'
Because they were made rational by him. 'But they became vain in their thoughts.' Thinking that they could comprehend God's greatness. 'And their foolish heart was darkened.' Departing indeed from the threshold of truth, by venerating the creature in place of the Creator, they lost the true light, that is, the wisdom of God. 'For, saying that they were wise.' As though they had found out how the invisible God might be worshiped in a visible image. 'They became fools.' Not understanding that he whom man had made is not God. 'And they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and of four-footed beasts, and of serpents.'
Here he names the worshipers of Jupiter, whom, on account of his most foul love affairs, they so often assert to have been transformed, as into a swan and a bull. 'Wherefore God gave them up.' 'God, in the desire of their heart.' God is said to give up while he does not restrain the delinquents, by just judgment, on account of the liberty of the will most prone to evil. And he forsakes those who forsake him, as he says through the Prophet: 'But if you forsake him, he also will forsake you.' And that: 'I let them go according to the desires of their heart, and they shall walk in their own inclinations.' 'Unto uncleanness.' Which is in the shameful mysteries of idols. 'That they should afflict their own bodies with insults.' While in the consecrations of idols they inflict on themselves brandings and burnings. 'In themselves.'
Life, which though they love, they do not spare themselves, so that in this too they carry through the feast of their error. 'Who changed the truth of God into a lie.' They transferred the worship of the true God into the lie of idols, which are falsely held for gods; for they deceive, since they lyingly claim to be that which they are not. 'And worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator.' They not only said it, but even served; and whoever is overcome by desire of any creature serves it—for by whatever a man is overcome, of this he is also the slave, so much so that even the belly becomes a god. 'Who is blessed forever.' Had they served him, they too could have become blessed forever. Cursed therefore and made temporal are they who forsook him who is blessed forever.
For concerning such it is said: 'Alike hateful to God are the impious man and his impiety.' 'Amen.' Truly, or faithfully. 'For this cause God gave them up to passions of dishonor.' On account of the causes mentioned above, they were given over even into these disgraceful deeds, so that the passion of the vice is already the punishment of the sin. 'For their women.' He therefore expressly stated these very crimes, that you might recognize that they had lost the reason of nature—they who nonetheless were made senseless, so as to pervert all things, being perverted against God; for those cannot keep the order of nature who have forsaken the Author of nature. 'They changed the natural use into that use which is against nature.' They perverted all things, as it is written. For the worship of unspeakable idols is the head of all evil, and its beginning, and its end.
'Likewise also the males, leaving the natural use of the woman.' For how could they keep the order of nature, having forsaken the Author of nature? 'Burned in their lusts one toward another, males working shame with males.' Unbridled lust knows not how to keep measure. 'And receiving in themselves the recompense which was fitting for their error.' So runs the order, that those who had forgotten the Lord should not even know themselves. 'And as they did not approve to have the Lord.' They were not ignorant, but they by no means approved him. For he approves that he has the Lord in his knowledge who always fears him as though present, and dares not to sin. 'God gave them over to a reprobate mind.' That is, they were left to a reprobate mind. 'To do those things which are not fitting.'
'Things which are not fitting for a man to do.' 'Filled with all iniquity and malice.' He shows that iniquity and malice are the chief causes of the vices. 'With fornication, avarice.' He joined fornication and avarice together, because both passions are likened to idolatry, just as he said in Exodus: 'They committed fornication against their God because of the filth of the idol.' For fornication, for a Christian, is to cleave to any thing other than to God, and to be corrupted by many desires. Whence Paul says that he has espoused us as a chaste virgin to one husband. 'Wickedness.' Avarice is insatiable for this reason, that after the riches of God, however much a man may have, it is too little. 'Full of envy, of murder.'
Fittingly did he associate murder with envy, because envy is the very first matter of this crime, for the first murder, both of the devil and of Cain, was born of envy. 'Strife.' Strife is where something is defended not by reason but by obstinacy of mind, and where truth is not sought but animosity is worn out. The first cause of a brother's death arose from strife. 'Deceit, malignity.' Deceit is hidden malice adorned with flattering words. 'Whisperers.' Murmurers, who speak not to the face but into the ear; or of whom it is said, 'Neither murmur ye.' Detractors hateful to God.
'Detractors hateful to God,' because nothing is so hateful to God as idolatry, to which detraction is compared, since both the idolater and the detractor are said by Scripture to be rooted out. 'Insolent.' Those who are swift in verbal injuries. 'Proud.' He who wishes to surpass what he is, is called proud, like the devil, who forfeited that which he was. And he who wishes to be above others, shall be made lower than himself. 'Haughty, inventors of evils.' The haughty man is one who is lifted up beyond his measure. 'Disobedient to parents.' In this place teachers too can be understood, the parents of souls. 'Foolish.' Because they have withdrawn from the very fount of wisdom. 'Undisciplined.' Every fool is disordered. 'Without natural affection, without honour.' Affection is the fulfilment of charity.
'Without mercy.' How could they have mercy on others, who refused to be merciful to themselves? 'Who, when they had known the justice of God.' Through this, that evil naturally displeases them, they knew the justice of God. 'They did not understand.' For if they had understood, they would have feared; if they had feared, they would never have committed such things. 'That they who do such things are worthy of death.' Of the judgment of God; even if not at present, yet they shall not escape the punishment to come. 'Not only they who do them, but they also who consent to those who do them.' They consent by receiving the doctrine, or by conniving (in another reading, by keeping company). CHAPTER II. 'Wherefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest. For wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou doest the same things which thou judgest.'
All who used to judge in this manner, but especially those who have the power of examining—not only judges but also lords—are here addressed. For by natural judgment each one pronounces a just sentence upon deeds. And all men know that innocence deserves reward, and wickedness deserves punishment; and therefore they are inexcusable, because they knew the justice of God. 'For we know that the judgment of God is according to truth against them that do such things.' Assuredly the judgment by which such men shall be judged is according to truth—men who knew how to condemn others for things which they themselves did not fear to commit. For if thou, a sinner, judgest a sinner like thyself, how much more shall the just God judge thee, unjust as thou art?
And therefore the judgment of God is according to truth, seeing that we read He spared neither His own friends nor the sinning angels, without respect of persons. But human judgment is corrupted in many ways. For it is depraved by love, or hatred, and also by avarice and fear, and sometimes even by mercy. 'And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them who do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?' Dost thou therefore flatter thyself with impunity, because God does not repay in the present, and dost thou despise His patience? 'The Lord,' he says, 'delayeth not His promise, but dealeth patiently for your sake, not willing that any should perish, but that all should return to penance;' for He is good in awaiting, He is just in punishing.
'Or despisest thou the riches of His goodness'—the abundance—'and patience and long-suffering, being ignorant that the benignity of God leadeth thee to penance?' Men greatly deceive themselves through the patience of God, because He does not choose to punish sinners at once. For they suppose either that He does not care for human affairs, or that He forgives what He defers. Very many even bring the charge, Why does He not repay in the present? Wretched too are they, ungrateful in this as in all the benefits of God, who impute it to Him that their destruction is passed over—not understanding that, if He repaid at once, no one of the lights would now remain, nor would the just be made out of the unjust. What more? The Church would not even have Paul himself.
For this reason God seems to men to wait a long time upon sinners: because we are of little time, and reckon a hundred years for an infinity. But He, with whom a thousand years are as one day, reckons a hundred years for an hour. And therefore this is but little before the Lord, since men too are wont to wait some days for sinners. It is human to fall short; it is human to repent for one's fault. No one sins more perilously than he who defends his sins. 'But according to thy hardness and impenitent heart thou treasurest up to thyself.' Thou, however, imprudent sick man, dost abuse the very remedy toward greater wounds, as Job says: 'God gave him a place of penance, and he abuses it unto pride.'
For piety unacknowledged prepares a greater judgment, so that he who scorned to feel mercy may feel vengeance. 'Wrath in the day of wrath.' Thou storest up wrath upon wrath for thyself with the Lord, which shall appear on days appointed and at fixed times, not before the day for which thou art awaited. 'And of the revelation of the just judgment of God, who will render to every man according to his works.' Because it is hidden, even though it is now seen through a glass in an enigma, or seen through a veil. 'To them indeed who, according to patience in good work.' The reward of good work is awaited through patience, because in the present life it is not repaid. For we walk by faith and not by sight, and then the work shall be perfect, if it endures unto the end. 'Glory.'
...let him say, wherewith the saints shall shine as the sun, and let them honour 'the honour of the sons of God.' For what is more honoured than the sons of God, who shall even judge the angels? 'And incorruption.' By incorruption he means the glory of immortality. 'To them that seek eternal life.' He who seeks eternal life shall obtain all these things, and he who has this hope in Him sanctifies himself, as it is said: 'Be ye holy, as He is holy.' 'But to them that are of strife.' Those who do not believe the evangelical truth, and consent to iniquity, who having forsaken the Creator serve the creature, who defend what is contrary to what they know, are contentious. Fear strife, lest ye suffer what follows. 'And who obey not the truth'—the evangelical truth. 'But believe iniquity.'
They knew these things who chose to believe iniquity; for it is not equitable, having forsaken the Creator of all, to serve the creature. 'Wrath and indignation.' All these things are prepared for sinners in the judgment; then there will be great and fruitless penance. 'Tribulation and anguish.' Of conscience and of vain penance, as it is written: 'Then shall the penitents say among themselves, and, groaning for anguish of spirit.' 'Upon every soul of man that worketh evil.' Because the soul sins first, therefore it chiefly feels the punishment; or the soul is put for the whole man, as it says that Jacob went down into Egypt in seventy souls. 'Of the Jew first, and of the Greek.' First, because they first knew the Lord, and were the first to transgress the law more gravely.
Or he puts 'first' for 'indeed,' for he himself also says: 'There is no respect of persons with God'—thus 'first' in time, not in honour. 'But glory, and honour, and peace to every one that worketh good.' Glory against wrath, honour against indignation, peace against tribulation and anguish; and what above he called incorruption, here he named peace. 'To the Jew first, and to the Greek.' What there he said in the soul of the Jew and the Greek, here he set down the man himself. And, as has been said, here he puts 'first' for 'indeed,' or 'first' in time of belief, not in honour. 'For there is no respect of persons with God.'
Lest the Gentiles excuse themselves on the ground of ignorance, since they are endowed with the law of nature; nor let the Jews flatter themselves concerning the law and circumcision, because not only profession but also conduct is required. 'For whosoever have sinned without the law, shall perish without the law; and whosoever have sinned in the law, shall be judged by the law.' By the law of the letter and the law of nature, that is, of mind and conscience. For to perish seems worse than to be judged. But since he speaks both of the Gentiles and of the Jews, who would dare to say that the Jews who sin in the law shall not perish, since they have not believed in Christ? seeing that without faith in Christ no one can be delivered, and for this cause they shall be so judged. They shall be borne away from the kingdom, yet they shall not perish from punishment.
But who doubts that both Gentiles and Jews, if they have not believed in Christ, shall perish? 'For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.' He gives the reason why they are not better than the Gentiles, whence we too ought to fear, lest hearing the law and not doing it, we perish together with the Gentiles. Nor let the Jew say, 'I have lived under the law, I am better than the Gentile.' The law therefore makes hearers, grace makes doers. For who would say that those were not justified who were obedient to the law out of faith? since, unless they were justified, they could not be obedient. But we say that it comes about by the law that men hear what God wills to be done; and it comes about by grace that the law is obeyed, because not the hearers but the doers of the law shall be justified.
'For when the Gentiles, who have not the law.' Lest, if it were said, they who have not the law of the letter—how shall they be able to be judged? 'Do by nature those things that are of the law, having not the law.' Either he speaks of those who keep the law of nature, who do not to others what they would not have done to themselves; or because even the Gentiles naturally praise the good and condemn the wicked, which is a work of the law; or of those who even now, while they do something good, profess that they have received from God the power whereby they may be able to please God, by punishing vices. 'These are a law to themselves,' who show the work of the law. He shows that they were not without law, both to make the Gentiles inexcusable, and to take from the Jews the glory concerning the peculiarity of the law.
For every man blushes in conscience for sin, and rejoices for a good deed done. 'Written in their hearts, their conscience bearing them witness.' The law of nature, therefore, in their hearts through the witness of conscience; or conscience testifies that it has the law while it sins, and that it rejoices when it overcomes sins. 'And their thoughts among themselves accusing or also defending one another, in the day when God shall judge the hidden things of men.'
He says there are disputes of thoughts, when, long deliberating whether something is to be done or not to be done, we judge; and that according to this we are to be judged in the day of the Lord, because it is proved that we were not ignorant of good and evil; or the thoughts of our conscience will be before our eyes in the day of judgment like histories to be recognised, and these will either accuse us or also excuse us. 'According to my Gospel through Jesus Christ.' According to what I announce through Jesus Christ; or through Jesus Christ God will judge the hidden things of men. 'But if thou art called a Jew.' After he has addressed the parts pertaining to the Gentiles, now he turns to the Jews, saying that he is proved a true Jew whose good things are more hidden than public. 'Art surnamed.'
In name, not in deed. 'And restest in the law.' Thou trustest, or art secure. 'And gloriest in God.' Thou gloriest that God is known in Judea only, that thou alone hast known God, or alone understandest His will. 'And knowest His will.' God's is understood; whence we are blessed, if the things that please God are known to us, and we do what He commands. 'And approvest the more useful things, being instructed by the law.' By reading or examining, because through nature, though weak, many useful things are approved; through the law, more useful; because through grace, more perfect. Again he recapitulates the exposition: Thou who restest in the law, how dost thou transgress the law? Thou who gloriest in God, why dost thou dishonour God? Thou who knowest His will, why dost thou not do it?
Thou who approvest useful things, why dost thou pursue useless and vain things? Blind guide, how dost thou not see the straight way? For if thou didst see it, thou wouldst surely walk by it. Light of others, how dost thou not cast off the works of darkness? Instructor of the unwise, why hast thou forsaken even the fear of the Lord, which is the beginning of wisdom? Master of infants, thou art a child in sense, who hast the form of knowledge and of truth in the law, yet neither dost thou thyself follow it, nor by thy bad example dost thou permit others to follow it. 'Thou art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind.' Of those, assuredly, who have lost the way without His light. 'A light of them that are in darkness.' In the darkness of ignorance. 'An instructor of the foolish.' Who have not the wisdom of God. 'A teacher of infants.' Whether little in age or in understanding.
'Having the form of knowledge and of truth in the law.' An example, so that those who without the law could not live rightly, thou hast a form, ever looking to which thou canst not err. 'Thou therefore that teachest another.' What he said to the Gentile: 'Wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself.' 'Teachest not thyself.' Why does thy life not agree with thy doctrine, and thy work destroy thy faith, and so it comes about that the law, not kept, not only profits thee nothing, but even holds thee guilty of a greater crime, as its despiser? 'Thou that preachest that men should not steal, stealest.' Some say: Thou stealest Christ, that is, thou hidest Him from men; or the sacred Scriptures, if thou couldst, thou wouldst wish to withdraw. 'Thou that sayest men should not commit adultery, committest adultery.'
There is not one kind of adultery only; for everything which thou owest wholly to God, if thou renderest it to any other than God, thou committest adultery—whether love, or fear, or service, or obedience, or hope; and therefore it is more grievously sinned by him from whom perfection is preached. 'Thou that abhorrest idols, committest sacrilege.' Sacrilege is that which is properly committed against God, as it were a violation of the sacred, or a transgression of the commandments. 'Thou that gloriest in the law.' Saying that thou art blessed because thou hast known the will of God. 'Through the transgression of the law thou dishonourest God.' He has expounded the sacrilege. 'For the name of God through you is blasphemed among the Gentiles, as it is written.' Woe to those by whose evil works the name of the Lord shall have been blasphemed, as it is written:
'They have polluted My holy name among the Gentiles,' while they who are called the people of God tarry as captives among the Gentiles, brought about by their own sins, so that the Gentiles would say that the Lord could not defend His own people, and that they had proved victors through their idols—not understanding that Israel, if it had held to the Lord, would always have ruled over them, and thereby been their defender. 'Circumcision indeed profiteth, if thou keep the law; but if thou be a transgressor of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.' It profits in its time, either because it makes the Jew live and not be exterminated. It can also be understood thus: Circumcision profits, because it makes one understood to be; because, when examined, the true circumcision of the heart is found to be coming when the circumcision of the flesh ceases.
He is a transgressor of the law while he does not follow what was there foretold. A sign profits, if the reality is present; otherwise a sign without the reality will be superfluous. For even the sign which Cain received signified this, that circumcision distinguished the Jews from the rest. And as he, a wanderer and a fugitive, endured with that very sign unto death, so the Jews unto the end, with the now empty sign of circumcision, scattered throughout the world, run about full of zeal and dread, and no one takes their circumcision from them; whether under pagan or under Christian princes, they bear that very sign, the murderers of Christ, as Cain the fratricide bore it. 'If therefore the uncircumcision keep the justices of the law.'
Visible things need invisible things; invisible things do not need visible things, in that visible things are images of invisible things. The circumcision of the flesh needs the circumcision of the heart; but the circumcision of the heart does not need the circumcision of the flesh, because the truth needs not the image, but the image needs the truth. Why then was circumcision given, if by itself it does not profit? First, that the people of God might be recognised among the Gentiles or in war. And that we are marked in such a member—first this is the cause, lest another member should be disfigured, which would be horrid to look upon;
then because of the promise of grace, in which one was to please through chastity; or that Christ might be signified as about to come from the circumcision, up to whom the carnal circumcision was to endure, whose type Jesus the son of Nave (Nun) bore, being commanded to circumcise the sons of Israel a second time. But this was a figure, so much so that it was said: 'In the last days God will circumcise thy heart.' And: 'Circumcise the foreskins of your heart.' And that original sin might be punished, even in the time of the law, in that member wherein it had been implanted. 'Shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? and shall judge that which by nature is.' Because it has the justice whose sign is circumcision. 'The uncircumcision fulfilling the law.' Fulfilling.
'Thee who by the letter and circumcision art a transgressor of the law?' While thou followest the circumcision of the letter, thou dost not deserve to receive the spirit. 'For it is not he that is a Jew in the manifest.' All things which formerly were done concerning the outer man bore the figure of the outer man. 'Neither is that circumcision which is in the manifest, in the flesh; but he that is a Jew in secret.' He is the true Jew. 'And the circumcision of the heart in the spirit.' Of which it is written in the law: 'In the last days God will circumcise thy heart, and the heart of thy seed.' 'In the spirit,' he says, that is, according to the new testament, which seeks the inner things, which God alone may see; and this is the true circumcision. 'Not in the letter, whose praise is not of men, but of God.'
The letter killeth, but the spirit quickeneth. The law of the letter was not given for the just, but for the unjust, and therefore it deserved the praise of men. But the law of Christ no longer threatens the sword to sinners, but promises a reward to those who serve freely, and therefore it has praise from God, who alone sees the heart, because it prays out of faith. CHAPTER III. 'What advantage then hath the Jew? or what is the profit of circumcision?' He gives the reason that the law was not empty, but that the prerogative of carnal circumcision is vain, being supported by no works. He asks, What advantage the Jew has. He answers, whether of himself or in the person of the Jews: 'Much every way.' For if it is his own sense, 'Much every way';
and, 'Every man a liar'—how does it afterward agree when he says: 'But if our iniquity,' and the rest? Finally, how does he deny that the Jews excel much every way? Great will be that profit, if they be zealous to keep the oracles which they merited to receive. 'First indeed, because the oracles of God were committed to them.' Which to the Gentiles were none. 'For what if some of them have not believed? Shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? God forbid.' For the unbelief of transgressors does not prejudice believers, and the promise of God which was made to Abraham, if it is made void concerning the transgressors, is fulfilled concerning the obedient, because truth knows not how to lie, as it is written: 'But God is true, and every man a liar.'
Because no one is without sin, except Him alone who neither had it by being born, nor contracted it by living. Therefore He alone is true, fulfilling what He promised, because in His seed the Gentiles were to be blessed, and they are blessed in Christ and through Christ, because in Him, through His grace, they believed; for even if it was made void in the unbelieving Jews, in those of that very people who by the gift of the Lord believed, it was both fulfilled, and unto the end is daily fulfilled more fully, because He who promised is true, and can in no way deceive. 'But God is true, and every man a liar: as it is written.' 'That thou mayest be justified when thou avengest upon sinners: That thou mayest be justified in thy words, and mayest overcome when thou art judged.'
'Thou overcomest when Thou art judged,' when Thou remittest me my sins, I confessing and condemning them. 'That Thou mayest be justified,' he says, 'in Thy words,' for God is true; for even if the blessing of the apostolate was made void in Judas the traitor, yet in Peter, who kept the faith, it was fulfilled. The promise was made void in the people who perished in the desert because of transgressions; it was fulfilled in those who by the gift of the Lord, faith cooperating, were led into the holy land. He also adds a testimony from Psalm 50 (51): 'That Thou mayest be justified,' he says, 'in Thy words, and mayest overcome when Thou art judged.' In the order of the psalm the utterance of the prophet stands thus:
'O Lord, Thou hast indeed declared, without respect of persons, that Thou wouldst take vengeance upon sinners; and indeed now, while Thou remittest to me, they judge Thy patience to be a lie; but Thou overcomest when Thou art judged, while Thou remittest me my sins, I confessing and condemning them, because Thou dost not judge twice for the same thing.' That is, while the man himself, his own judge, prosecutes his fault in himself with lamentation and contrition, the indulgence of Thy piety is not proved to be unjust. While Thou provest me guilty of a monstrous deed through the prophet, Thou provest that Thou hast care for our works, and Thou overcomest those who judged Thee careless of human deeds.
Therefore concerning this sense of the Apostle I have set down the whole exposition of a certain holy man, that the reader's attention might be more fully imbued; and wherever thou findest full pages thus, I have set this down for instruction. 'That Thou mayest be justified,' he says, 'in Thy words, and mayest overcome when Thou art judged.' Let us see how in this place the Apostle's discourse agrees with the testimony which he took up from the prophet, in order to confirm his own discourse. The Apostle evidently sets down this sentence in that sense in which David of old had uttered it under the voice of penance, saying: 'O Lord, Thou hast promised that the Saviour of the human race should come from my seed:'
'now, while Thy people sees me wounded by a twofold crime, I have caused the sons of Israel to blaspheme, so that, while they behold my guilt in adultery and murder, they may think Thee to have lied; and therefore acknowledge the prayer of satisfaction, and do Thou remit what I myself condemn, so that when Thou hast restored me by granting propitiation, and hast made me worthy of Thy promise, Thou mayest appear just in Thy words, and mayest overcome when Thou art judged by reproachers.' And so now the Apostle follows this line, saying: 'Although the transgressing Jews have caused the name of the Lord to be blasphemed, so that it is said: This was that holy nation and chosen people, who now involves itself in transgression and inexpiable sacrilege and the crime of impiety;'
behold, through the wickedness of the transgressors the promises of God have been made void. But it is not so; for if the transgressors have fallen from grace, the obedience of the faithful obtains the Lord's truthful pledge; and thus, those being confounded who boasted that the divine oracles had been brought to nought, the Lord is justified in His words, and overcomes when He is judged, while He confers upon believers the grace repudiated by unbelievers. But as to what he says: 'God is true, and every man a liar,' and again: 'But if our iniquity commend the justice of God,' let the unbelievers receive both this testimony in a reasonable sense. 'But if our iniquity commend the justice of God, what shall we say? Is God unjust, who executeth wrath?'
'But if our iniquity commend the justice of God,' it is unjust, he says, if He takes vengeance upon those who sinned for this very end, that He might appear more just; for by what justice will He condemn injustice, if, according to thee, He is made more just by human iniquity? In this place, while the teacher of the Gentiles discourses, the case of two persons is turned about, that is, under the ignorance of one interpreting badly, and under the teaching of the Apostle refuting him; and as if to the Apostle a contrary party, imprudently believing, were thus to say:
'O Apostle, thou hast conferred great solace upon our sins, by saying that God is justified in the pardon of our transgressions, and that our lies commend the truth of God, and our sins furnish God with matter for mercy, so that through our iniquities His goodness is exercised and His glory enlarged—unjustly are our sins punished, which avail to manifest the patience and benevolence of God.' At once he brings it forward. Thus far the adverse objection; here the Apostle answers their sense: God is unjust, he says, if He takes vengeance upon those through whose sins He appears benign, and I ought not to be judged, who lie, because by my lie the truth of God, gathered together, is found the more worthy to be preached.
'And therefore the greater the evils we shall have done, the greater the goods we shall receive from Him for whose praise we have sinned.' Perhaps the imprudent thought that it ought to be understood thus, because we read: 'Where sin abounded, grace did more abound,' as though the thing that gives the merit of sin, while it furnishes the increase of God's clemency. But this sentence is to be understood far otherwise. And that the abundance of sins was so consumed by satisfaction and amendment, that the amended deserved not only pardon but even rewards: 'that Thou mayest be justified,' he says, 'in Thy words.' This testimony the adverse party propounded as though David had said: 'For this reason I sinned, that while Thou judgest me, Thou mightest appear just, or merciful while Thou remittest;'
'and therefore Thou oughtest to spare me, because my iniquity commends either Thy mercy or Thy justice.' Hence the Apostle rebuts their error, and by interposed sentences he destroys it, saying: 'If, as some report that we say, our iniquity commend the justice of God, then God is unjust, who executeth wrath'—since our iniquity proclaims His mercy. 'I speak according to man. God forbid.' That is, according to thy carnal sense, or according to thee, who from the sentence above judgest so unskilfully and understandest so imprudently. For by what justice will He condemn injustice, if, according to thy opinion, He is made more just by human iniquity? But it is not so.
For not so much our sins as the deeds of good works glorify our God, and therefore in punishing sins He is acknowledged just, He who delights in holy works. Otherwise how shall God now judge the world, if He does not repay good things to the good and evil things to the evil, so as to render to the just the reward for justice, and to sinners what they deserve? 'For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto His glory'—what? That is, why am I also judged as a doer of evil? and not, as some report that we say, that the greater the evils we shall have done, the more ample the goods we shall receive. 'Yet.' Moreover. 'And I as a sinner'—a man who lies. 'Am judged'—by God in the day of judgment. This is the sense, as though he should say:
'O unbeliever, from my words thou assertest a defence of thy sins, by saying that our iniquity commends the justice of God, and that His truth grows out of our lies, and, compared to our weakness, appears greater and greater. But while thou thus flatterest thy evils with a hostile severity, thou art to be punished with just condemnation by Him who will judge the world according to the works of each and every one.' Whence this passage seems the more difficult, because it is obscured by the questions of the unskilled of the adverse party; just as in another place the Apostle propounds irrational objections and rejects them: 'For what shall we say? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid.' And a little after: 'What then? Shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace?'
By no means. Finally, the Apostle, doing away with the objection by the perception of the truth, speaks thus: 'And not, as we are slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say, Let us do evil that good may come.' And this is a foolish objection, which, appending it, he demolishes, saying: 'Whose condemnation is just.' For what is more just than that a man should feel the punishment of his own sin? — which they lyingly said we deny, we who preach nothing more than the just judgment of God. 'What then? are we better than they?' We Jews, that is: I find no cause whereby either side should be superior, since we judge all to be under sin; for reason itself perceives this, that both Jews and Gentiles are under sin, as is also proved by the testimony of the psalm. 'No, in no wise.' He answered his own question.
'For we have charged.' We have reasoned. 'Both Jews and Greeks' — all to be under sin. 'And the Gentiles.' 'As it is written: There is none righteous.' The psalm from which he took this testimony speaks of the foolish man, and he shows that this was fulfilled at the coming of Christ, at which time no righteous one was found. 'No, not one.' Neither Jew nor Greek. 'There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.' Because he does not understand, he does not seek. And God is then sought, when His will is inquired into and fulfilled. 'They are all gone out of the way.' Necessarily he goes astray who has refused to seek the firm foundation. 'They are together become unprofitable.' For the work for which they had been created. 'There is none that doeth good.'
There was therefore none to do good, since the transgression of the commandments condemned the Jews, and the law of nature condemned the Gentiles. When therefore someone from either side has done good, let him know that he owes it to grace, not to nature, as the prophet says, referring to the Lord: 'In whose sight no one is innocent of himself.' And Isaiah says in his canticle: 'Lord our God, thou wilt give us peace: for thou hast wrought all our works in us.' 'There is none, even to one.' Some say, up to Christ. 'Their throat is an open sepulchre.' By the stench of their teaching they heap up the violence of their pestilent odour. Every odour of death proceeds from their mouth: that is, from pestilent and flattering words which slay the hearers.
For this reason sepulchres are closed, lest by the exhalation of their kind they breed a plague among the living. 'With their tongues they have dealt deceitfully.' Uttering one thing with the mouth, meditating another in the heart. 'The poison of asps.' The venom of these serpents is said to be more deadly than that of the rest. 'Is under their lips.' That is, in the heart. 'Whose mouth is full of cursing.' For whatever is spoken with evil intent is without doubt spoken ill. 'And bitterness.' The bitterness of Antichrist is contrary to the sweetness of the word of God. 'Their feet are swift to shed blood.' Not to free souls, but to destroy them, or rather to slay souls, not by announcing to them their sins, but by confirming them in those very sins through flattery. Whence Paul says: 'I am clean from the blood of all.'
'Destruction and unhappiness are in their ways.' Souls are worn down and made wretched in their ways, that is, in their teachings or in the examples of their conduct. 'And the way of peace they have not known.' The doctrine of the Father, whereby God might be reconciled to men, they have not known: for Christ is our peace. He has treated this from the beginning of the epistle, in order to show that all are in need of the mercy of God, and mercy lies in the power of the giver. For no one can say that he ought to have received more. 'There is no fear of God before their eyes.' He has concluded with the fear of God: for if they had always had the fear of God before their eyes, they would surely not have sinned; for neither does a servant dare to sin in the presence of his master.
'Now we know that whatsoever things the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law.' Lest the Jews should say that this was spoken of the Gentiles. — In what manner did the Jews say, 'There is no God'? Not indeed in word, but in deed. For they confess that they know the Lord, but in their works they deny Him. Therefore he does not here touch the Gentiles, but had already spoken of the Gentiles before, and no one doubted concerning their crimes. Lest they should say this was written of the Gentiles, he shows that everything which is said in the law concerning the Gentiles is said also of the Jews themselves, since theirs is the principal case. 'That every mouth may be stopped.' Not only of the Gentiles, but also of the Jews: since they have nothing whereof they can glory. 'And all the world may be made subject to God.' That each may know he cannot be saved without the grace of God;
or at least, in the confession of his sin, may hope for mercy, knowing himself to be in sins. 'Because by the works of the law.' This he does against the Pelagians, who say that the law justifies. And by the works of the law he means circumcision, and the sabbath, and the rest. 'No flesh shall be justified.' It shall not be justified, because the law brought nothing to perfection. Hence he begins to dispute against them, with a great and long conflict — against those who gloried in the law, and believed themselves to be justified by the law and not by grace; teaching in order that the law could not take away sin but rather increased it, which grace takes away; because the law knows how to command, to which infirmity succumbs, whereas grace knows how to help, by which charity is poured in.
We do not say that those were justified who were obedient to the law, but that unless they had been justified, they would not have been obedient. 'Flesh.' Man. 'In his sight.' Not every righteousness is justified in the Lord's sight, but that which proceeds from the pure will of God, not that whose precept merely soothes human infirmity: as was the case of those to whom the righteousness of God could not then be revealed, but to whom only the knowledge of sin was shown, because, seeking to establish their own, they were not subject to the righteousness of God. 'For by the law is the knowledge of sin.'
Not remission, not consumption, but knowledge — either because the law of nature was in oblivion, or because before the law of the letter the lighter offences were not known to be sins, such as concupiscence, and other things which harmed not another but the man himself. 'But now the righteousness of God without the law.' Which has been freely given to us by God, not obtained by our labour. 'Is made manifest.' Which was hidden. 'Being witnessed by the law and the prophets.' This righteousness was proclaimed by the oracles of the law as about to come in the last times. 'But the righteousness of God is by faith of Jesus Christ.'
This righteousness, which is conferred through faith — faith itself is poured in by the hidden inspiration of God as a gift of grace, not acquired by human labour nor by the work of the Old Testament; because, as has been said, it is His gift that we should believe. 'Unto all that believe.' Not upon the Jews alone. He shows that they received such a law for this reason, because they did not believe, and therefore in the present they referred either the merit of sin or of righteousness. 'For there is no distinction.' 'For all have sinned and need the glory of God.' That is, between Jew and Gentile, since both parties have been shut up in unbelief, and they need the glory of the Redeemer, which is extended unto the salvation of believers.
For the Jews, by transgressing the law of the letter, and the Gentiles by transgressing the law of nature, were alike found sinners, both through original sin and through actual sin. 'Being justified freely.' Without any preceding merits, justified through baptism. Since He freely forgave the sins of all who did not deserve it, hear 'freely,' and be silent about merits. 'By His grace.' Because He paid on our behalf what He did not owe, that He might save us who were freely redeemed. 'Through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus.' We have been redeemed from the captivity of sin, not from nature, because by nature we were always His own; for he who redeems teaches that the one he redeems was his own, as the prophet teaches: 'You were sold for nothing, and you shall be redeemed without money.' Christ therefore redeemed us, as Peter says:
'Knowing that you were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation,' and so forth; and Paul: 'For you are bought with a great price.' We have therefore been redeemed from the death to which we had been sold through sin, according to Isaiah who says: 'What is this bill of divorce? For you were sold for your sins.' This death Christ overcame, He who did no sin, because we were all debtors to death through sin. But He delivered Himself over to death, to which He owed nothing, that He might redeem us from death by His own blood. He did not buy us, because we were His by His own nature; but He redeemed us, because we were held captive. 'Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in His blood.'
He has set it forth openly, because He gives freely, so that no one should despair, nor be exalted on account of his own merits; because propitiation and the remission of sins has been bestowed through the blood of Christ, in a figure of which, even in the Old Testament, the blood of victims was offered for the sins of the people. 'For the manifestation of His righteousness.' In this He says He manifested His righteousness, in that He held His forbearance unwavering in expectation of our amendment; thus mercy of remission comes to us, while He suffers who committed no sin, because God does all things justly. Justly therefore did the devil lose the debtor, because he unjustly slew the innocent. 'For the remission of former sins.' Why 'former'? — unless of the debts of original sin. 'Through the forbearance of God.'
The forbearance of God had advanced toward greater sins. 'For the manifestation of His righteousness.' That He might reveal the righteousness which is of faith, that is, Christ, in this last time. 'That He Himself might be just, and the justifier.' He who alone was found just, and who justifies those whom He Himself has justified; because He knew no sin, therefore He condemned sins. 'Of him who is of the faith of Jesus.' 'Of faith,' he says, 'of Jesus,' which Jesus Himself gave, and not of the works of the law or of nature. 'Where is then thy glorying? It is excluded.' He speaks to the Jews. Where is your pride, in which you gloried that you were better by carnal circumcision? Your glorying is excluded. 'By what law? of works?' No, but by the law of faith. There follows: 'Is it by works,' that is, by the works of the law?
And he answers: No, but by the law of faith. He calls the grace of faith 'the law of faith,' through which we come to Christ, through which we receive faith. 'For we account that a man is justified by faith.' We define, we are certain, this we judge. 'Without the works of the law.' By adding 'of the law,' he shows that there are also works of faith. How then does James say: 'Faith without works is dead'? But Paul speaks of the works of the law, whereas James speaks of the works which prove a man to be faithful, as he himself sets forth in what follows: 'Show me thy faith by thy works.' Works are those by which faith is recognized. 'Is He the God of the Jews only?' Did not God make all, and does He not equally care for all?
Not to you only, but also to the Gentiles came Christ, promised from the law — nay rather to them the more. 'Only.' As though the Jews should say: But the Gentiles forsook God; and it is answered them: And you too. They sinned, and you too. But we are converted, and they too. To us came the promised Christ, and to them too. Therefore He is not your God only, or as if you did not know that all are born of Adam, and that it was written that the Gentiles would believe in Christ, as He says: 'My house shall be called a house of prayer for all nations.' And again: 'Hear the voice of the trumpet, and they said, We will not hear. For this the Gentiles shall hear.' 'Is He not also of the Gentiles?' Of the Gentiles who believe, since the prophets frequently spoke of their calling. 'Yea, of the Gentiles also.'
That is, much more also of the Gentiles, because before the law the saints pleased God. And he best preserved the manner in his words: he said 'nay rather,' to show the Gentiles the more, because there were holy uncircumcised men before there were circumcised, and Abraham believed and was justified before circumcision. 'Seeing it is one God who justifieth the circumcision by faith.' He announces that both peoples are to be saved through the faith of Christ, that is, by faith. For neither the uncircumcision nor the circumcision is justified without faith. 'And the uncircumcision through faith.' As Abel, Noah, and the rest. 'Do we then make void the law through faith?' By no means. Do we then make void the law through faith, which taught circumcision? By no means — so much so that he says Moses was nearly slain on account of his circumcised son.
Lest therefore they should say: You then destroy the law, in which all who believed were righteous, being circumcised — before the law they were uncircumcised, but nevertheless none was uncircumcised under the law. Not only, he says, do I not destroy it, but I confirm it, while I preach this circumcision which that one foretold: 'In the last days,' he says, 'the Lord God will circumcise thy heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love thy God.' This is faith. Then would I destroy the law, if I called it false — that is, saying it would not cease, when it promised of itself that it would cease, as Jeremiah says: 'I will give you a new covenant.' And Isaiah: 'Out of Sion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.' 'But we establish the law.'
We cause it to stand, while we prove to be true what it said concerning the ancient righteous ones and the Gentiles who would believe, and that a spiritual circumcision would come, while faith accomplishes what the law commands — which faith if it be not present, the law only commands, and holds guilty those who fulfil not its commands; for the law is not fulfilled except through charity, which the Holy Spirit pours in through His grace. CHAPTER IV. 'What then shall we say that Abraham our father hath found?' He recalls them to the head of circumcision, that what stood firm at the beginning may be held throughout. Circumcision is in the flesh, but faith consists in the mind. Abraham according to faith through the uncircumcision is the father of the Gentiles; according to the flesh he is the father of the circumcision.
But the faith by which he is the father of the Gentiles consists not in the flesh, but in the mind. 'According to the flesh.' That is, according to the circumcision of the flesh. 'For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath glory.' How by works, since he too came from among the Gentiles? 'But not before God.' But he has it before himself, because he fulfils the commands; otherwise, nothing. If God had given to him, yet he had glory from himself, from his own works. But since the faith given by God justifies him without the presumption of works, he gives glory not to himself but to the Lord, out of His gratuitous bounty.
He says therefore that blessed Abraham found righteousness not by works (because he lived before the law), but by faith (because he believed the promises of God); and because faith through the grace of God justifies not only the sinner but even the ungodly, on account of God's goodness, while he has confidence not from works, but understands himself in all things to be a debtor to God, because he found nothing which he could arrogate to himself from merits. 'For what saith the Scripture?' Let us question the Scripture. 'Abraham believed God.' He proved it, and therefore has glory before God. So great was Abraham's faith, by the gift of God, that both his former sins were forgiven him, and it alone was reckoned to him for all righteousness; and having received it, he burned with so great love that thenceforth he ever pleased God. 'And it was reputed to him unto righteousness.'
Faith alone was reckoned as recompense. 'Now to him that worketh, the reward is not reckoned according to grace, but according to debt.' He sets forth the example itself. And because the law requires works, whereby the Pharisee was exalted; when therefore the divine compassion justifies the ungodly, presumption can have no place of merit. For he is a debtor before he obeys the precepts, and unless he obey, he is condemned. But if he do them, he has no glory, because he is an unprofitable servant, who does nothing more. 'But to him that worketh not.' He speaks of the circumcision, and of other things of this kind. 'But believeth in Him that justifieth the ungodly.' He justifies the ungodly by faith alone, not by works, which he did not have; for if according to works, he must be punished, not delivered.
At the same time it must be noted that it is not the sinner who is justified by faith, but the ungodly. 'His faith is reputed unto righteousness,' according to the purpose of the grace of God: 'as David also saith.' As of Abraham; and of us his sons through grace. 'The blessedness of a man.' Great is the blessedness, without the labour of the law or of penance, to obtain faith through grace alone, according to the purpose of God, whereby He purposed to forgive sins freely. 'Unto whom God reckoneth righteousness without works.' To him righteousness is reckoned without works, who by faith — whereby he first believed God — is both absolved from the past, and justified in the present, and prepared for the future works of faith.
He wishes to prove that even in the law itself it is foretold that righteousness without works profits, and that he does not defend this by his own authority, but confirms it by the example of the prophet. What is remitted is not; what is covered is not disclosed, and therefore neither is it imputed. 'Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven.' Against the arrogance of the Jew, because blessedness and the remission of sins is the work of belief, not of labour. Some say that sins are remitted through baptism, covered by the tears of penance, and not imputed at all in martyrdom. Although the whole may be understood in the faith of baptism, yet when sins have been forgiven, God is loved. For to whom more is forgiven, he loves more, and therefore charity covers a multitude of sins, so that love may overcome the former contempt.
But He imputes not, while thenceforth He delights in his good works, which are done through charity, nor does He remember his former deeds. 'And whose sins are covered.' By charity. 'Blessed is the man to whom the Lord hath not imputed sin.' Nor remembers it. 'Is this blessedness then in the circumcision, or also in the uncircumcision?' Some wish to assign this blessedness to three times: Nature, Circumcision, and Christianity; but in order to exclude them from the glory of privilege, he himself says, not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. 'For we say that faith was reputed to Abraham unto righteousness.' Because we both confess him to have been justified;
since therefore we treat of Abraham, let us take in all cases what reason finds concerning him, let us all hold this without doubt, that this faith profited not Abraham alone, but all who follow the example of his belief, as we read in what follows, that it may be reputed to him for righteousness. 'How then was it reckoned? in circumcision, or in uncircumcision?' Let us see whether he was righteous because circumcised, or was circumcised because found righteous: whether circumcision was born of righteousness, or righteousness of circumcision. 'Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.' He was justified before he was circumcised. Therefore he was not justified on account of circumcision. 'And he received the sign of circumcision.' Lest they should say:
Why then was he circumcised, if he did not need circumcision? It is a sign, he says, of righteousness, not an increase. Again, otherwise: That he might show how righteous and faithful he was, who did not hesitate to inflict pain upon himself at the command of God, not thinking that superfluous which was commanded by the Lord of all knowledge — just as neither was the impious act of slaying his son, which the fount of piety had commanded. 'A seal of the righteousness of faith.' That he might signify the righteousness of Christ, which is of faith, which is now in the uncircumcision, or which was born to him in the uncircumcision. Again, otherwise: So perfect was his faith that it deserved a seal; a thing full and great is always sealed. 'Which is in the uncircumcision.' Now in those who believe from among the Gentiles. 'That he might be the father of all them that believe through uncircumcision.'
That all who believe from among the Gentiles may, according to faith, be sons of Abraham: since to them also faith alone is reckoned unto righteousness, and they too are circumcised, not in flesh but in heart; or because before circumcision he was righteous, the father of the righteous uncircumcised. 'That it might be reputed also to them for righteousness, and that he might be the father of the circumcision.' When they have been justified, they are circumcised: for if the uncircumcised man is righteous, his uncircumcision shall be reputed for circumcision. For now there is no need of the sign by which he might be known among men. For there is not one nation of God, but a gathering out of all: because now Christ, the expectation of the Gentiles, has come.
Not to those only who are of the circumcision faithful, but also to those who follow the footsteps of the faith which our father Abraham had in uncircumcision — if they imitate him. 'For not through the law.' Not through the law, but before the law: because in the law indeed belief was given concerning the faith and promise of Abraham; but Moses, who wrote the law, came afterward. Then he himself says to the Galatians: 'That the law, which was made four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make void the promise.' 'Was the promise to Abraham, or to his seed, that he should be heir of the world.' Not through circumcision. 'But through the righteousness of faith.' That in the seed of Abraham, that is, in Christ, all nations might be blessed, to whom the nations were given by the Father for an inheritance;
or that the nations may rest with Him, as the Saviour says: 'They shall come from the East and the West, and shall recline with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob.' 'For if they who are of the law be heirs.' If of the circumcision, according to you: if they alone, as you wish, are heirs, then God did not render to Abraham what He promised through righteousness, that he should be the father of many nations, and he seems to have believed without cause. But it is not so: for God fulfilled the promise to Abraham, because from every part of the world the nations believe in Christ. 'Faith is made void, the promise is abolished.' Therefore no one is justified by faith, not even Abraham himself. But since faith cannot be made void, nor the promise abolished, it remains that the inheritance is not of the law, but through the righteousness of faith.
For the law does not forgive sins, but points them out [otherwise: avenges or judges]. And therefore it cannot make sons of Abraham, because, inasmuch as all were found under sin, all were to be punished. Therefore it is of faith, that, sins being forgiven through grace, they may become sons of Abraham. 'For the law worketh wrath.' Which was laid down for the unrighteous, which rather burdened sinners, and did not absolve them, because it was laid down for the unrighteous: for in the present it inflicted punishment upon transgressors. For what else is the law but mere letter to those who know how to read it, and cannot fulfil it? For to such it is letter, because it is not a helper of readers, but a witness against sinners.
For this reason indeed the law worketh wrath, that, man being terrified and turned toward fulfilling the righteousness of the law, the mercy of God may bestow grace through Jesus Christ our Lord, who is the wisdom of God; of whom it is written: 'He carries the law and mercy upon His tongue.' The law, that it may terrify; mercy, whereby it may succour. And so the knowledge of the law makes the proud a transgressor; but through the gift of charity it delights one to be a doer of the law. The law, he says, worketh wrath — this is so because the wrath of God is greater against the transgressor, who through the law knows sin and yet commits it. 'For where there is no law, neither is there transgression.' Which was laid down on account of transgression: for where the precept came from the law, there also abounded the occasion of transgression.
'Therefore it is of faith.' Heirs by faith, not by law. 'That it might be according to grace.' Diligently observe that he said 'according to grace,' so that presumption may cease, which flatters itself concerning merits. 'That the promise might be sure to all the seed.' Not to him only who is of the law, but also to him who is of the faith of Abraham. Because all the nations believe, and the promise to Abraham is fulfilled. 'Who is the father of us all, as it is written.' The father of both the uncircumcised and the circumcised. In this place, where Abraham is called the father of many nations, the pride of the Jews is confounded, because he is the father of the Jews by the flesh, of the Gentiles by faith. 'For I have made thee a father of many nations, before God, whom thou hast believed.' Because by himself he could not be the father even of one son. 'Who quickeneth the dead.'
He says 'to beget the dead,' that it may especially fit Sarah, that it may especially fit the barren woman: because the fruit of offspring, which age had not obtained, perfect faith deserved to obtain. 'And calleth those things that are not, as those that are.' Although in the beginning He called those things which were not, and at the beck of Him who commanded they at once began to be, yet here He signifies concerning the despaired-of conception of a son. 'Who against hope.' It was against the hope of nature that an old woman should bear, and that his seed should be as the stars of heaven: 'Believed in hope.' In hope of the power of God. 'That he might be made the father of many nations.' Because as yet he was the father of one son. 'According to that which was spoken: So shall thy seed be, as the stars of heaven and the sand of the sea.'
Because the Apostle was speaking to those who knew the law, by the sand he signified the Jews, by the stars the Gentiles who believe: understand the former as earthly, the latter as heavenly; because even from the very race of the Jews the primitive Church, which believed, is deservedly compared to heaven and the stars. 'And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was almost a hundred years old, nor the dead womb of Sarah.' Faith considers nothing of nature: because in those things which God promises, nature readily serves its author. It is asked how Abraham afterward begot sons of Keturah, who could not before beget of Sarah. He did not beget of Sarah for this reason, that she was old and barren.
But from her who was set in the vigour of youth, he was easily able to procreate. 'And in the promise of God he did not hesitate with distrust, but was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God.' He doubted neither because of the impossibility of old age, nor because of the greatness of the promise: because he looked not to his own years, but to the promises of the Almighty, giving glory to God, as though giving thanks for what he had received. 'Most fully knowing that whatsoever God hath promised, He is able also to perform.' That is, most certainly. He therefore who is able to do what He promised produces the faith of the Gentiles. He therefore works faith in our hearts in a wonderful and ineffable manner, that we may believe. 'Therefore it was reputed to him unto righteousness.'
'Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was reputed to him.' Because if he believed. And otherwise: It must be observed that with God not only the devotion of work has merit, but also firm and perfect belief. 'But also for us, unto whom it shall be reputed.' Not that we should know only what manner of man he was, but that he should be an example to us all, as a father to his sons: as are all the examples of the saints, or their temptations, that they themselves might know themselves, and we might follow their examples. Therefore the saints are tempted, that they may recognize themselves: therefore, being tested, they are justified, that we may follow their footsteps. 'To them that believe in Him who raised up Jesus Christ our Lord from the dead.' Let us see in what order in this place he has passed to the resurrection of Christ:
that is, it shall be reputed to us also, if we so perfectly believe that Christ rose from the dead, as he believed that the dead body of Sarah could be quickened to conceive. 'Who was delivered up for our offences.' In the delivering-up, mercy was shown; in the resurrection, power: and that an example of the new life from resurrection, which is our justification, might be given to us; that He might bear our sins, He died: He rose again, that through His resurrection He might show forth the glory of our justification. 'And rose again for our justification.' Therefore He died, that He might restore life to the dead.
Therefore He appeared in that very body in which He was crucified, that He might confirm the faith and righteousness of believers, when in the fulness of the promise He might recognize the fruit of their belief. CHAPTER V. 'Being justified therefore.' When the Jews and Gentiles disputed among themselves — the former presuming upon the works of the ancient law, the latter upon the new calling of Christ — the case having been thoroughly examined, since none of them was justified by his own merit, but all by grace, which infuses faith and shows forth the truth; and since neither race nor circumcision, but faith makes sons of Abraham, who before circumcision was justified by belief alone:
— this reasoning being concluded, he exhorts them to have peace with God, because no one is saved by his own merits, but all by the grace and mercy of God. 'By faith.' Which is of God, that we should believe; as he also says to the Galatians: 'But after faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.' And to the Hebrews: 'Looking unto the author and finisher of faith, Jesus Christ.' 'Let us have peace with God.' Either let us be subject to God, or let us have the peace of God, not of the world. 'Through our Lord Jesus Christ.' Not by works, through whom we have access by faith into this grace. Through whom we, who were afar off, have come near. 'In which we stand.' Because before grace we lay prostrate. 'And we glory in the hope of the glory of the sons of God.'
In that which seems incredible we glory through faith: that we, sons of God, hope for adoption; and so great is what we hope for that no one would dare presume it of himself, for it lies in the power of God alone that a man should be able to be raised into the number of the sons of God. He shows also that we have that in which we may rightly and without peril glory. For great is the glory to be enrolled through faith and hope among the number of the sons of God. In the hope of the glory of the sons of God there is promised to us that which, as has been said, no one dared to hope for; and if perchance it had fallen into anyone's mind, he might have supposed that he had fallen into blasphemy—so great is it that by many it seems, for its very greatness, to be incredible.
That is, because we hope to obtain the glory of the sons of God. And not only so, but we also glory in tribulations. Therefore one glories in tribulations, because through them the virtue of patience is displayed, and from patience is born the approval of faith; while hope is nourished by the proof of an unconquered spirit. The saints therefore glory in the endurance of tribulation without the danger of vanity. For not only in the glory of hope, but also in tribulations most healthful to us do we glory, knowing how great a recompense it holds, as James says: 'Count it all joy, my brethren, when you fall into diverse temptations.' And this: 'Blessed is the man who endures temptation, for when he has been proved, he shall receive the crown of life.'
For it is granted us to glory in glorious tribulation; and if we do so, it is as though someone, despising a coin of brass or lead, should obtain a royal gem—though the comparison is not worthy, for here, however the price differs, the corruption of both nevertheless remains, while there great things take the place of small, and enduring things succeed to fleeting ones. 'Knowing that tribulation'—it is now said to be known, because it is most firmly believed. 'Works patience'—in tribulation patience appears or is increased. The faithful desire to suffer something for the Lord's name, that from tribulation once ended they may acquire rewards that abide without end. 'And patience proof, and proof hope.' He who has been patient in all things is proved.
For the furnace proves the potter's vessels, and the temptation of tribulation proves just men. 'But hope does not confound.' The hope of things to come drives out all the confusion of present things; whence he is proved not to have hope who is crushed by the precepts of Christ. 'Because the charity of God.' From this we know how greatly God loves us: that not only did He forgive us our sins through the death of His Son, but also bestowed upon us the gift of the Holy Spirit, who purges and illumines the hidden things of hearts and even now reveals the glory of things to come. 'Is poured forth in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who is given to us.' The greatness of the benefits stirs up in itself a greatness of charity, which, being perfect, knows not how to fear, nor is confounded.
This charity, however, is given us not by our own merit, but through the Holy Spirit; for that very charity is known to be the fullness of the law. And therefore let no one glory in himself, but in God, whose gift it is; nor let him say, 'I believed by the natural law, and thus received the Holy Spirit'—for no one anticipates God, but we are always forestalled by His mercy. 'For why did Christ, while we were yet weak…'—He wishes here to show that He died for the ungodly, and to commend the greatness of His benefits: that we, so undeservedly loved by Him, may see how much we ought to love Him; or whether anything should be preferred to so holy and so great a benefit, since He preferred neither His own life to us ungodly ones, nor refused death.
'In due time He died for the ungodly.' Either because Christ suffered at the last age of the world, or for the present, or for the space of three days, as it was foretold, He died. He therefore who says that He died for the ungodly shows that we ought to love unto death the merciful Lord, whom we know to have undergone the torment of death for ungodly servants. And at the same time it is to be noted that he says 'for the ungodly,' so that human presumption may be restrained, lest it attribute anything to its own merits. 'For scarcely for a just man will one die.' This tells against Pelagius, who denies original sin; for if this had not bound man, the death of Christ would not have been necessary.
It is fitting, then, that a man should pour out his life without hesitation for the confession of the good Lord, who died not for the just but for the ungodly; and even so let us cease to presume upon ourselves. For if scarcely for a just man will one die, who would die for the wicked and ungodly, save He who had come to save that which was lost—to whom no one first gave, but who received from Him, that he might believe? 'For peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.' So readily; for the good is that which is just, according to that commandment, 'just and good.' 'But God commends His charity.' When something undue is rendered, then charity is commended. What then is so undue as that the merciful Lord, without sin, should die for an ungodly servant—God in us?
How greatly He loves us we know from His death: 'For when we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, being now justified by His blood, shall we be saved.' If He so loved sinners, how much more will He guard those whom He has already made just? And if He interceded for strangers, much more does He not suffer His own to perish. If He gave Himself for the ungodly, how can He deny what is His own? Not now through the blood of animals, as in the law, but through the blood of the Son of God does He admonish us that we are debtors. And that we may understand how greatly He loves those received back, who reconciled His enemies. 'From wrath'—the wrath of judgment. 'Through Him'—through Him we shall be saved, not through ourselves; that is, if we shall have been His member.
For when all things shall burn, only the body of the Judge shall be saved. 'For if, when we were enemies…' We were enemies before the gift of His grace and before the sacrament of baptism; but those also are known to be enemies who, after baptism, entangle themselves in disgraceful deeds and crimes and will not amend their errors by penitence, as James says: 'The friendship of this world is enmity with God.' Enemies, therefore, not by nature but by a contrary will. 'We were reconciled'—because we had been made estranged and enemies through transgression. For no one is reconciled except from a state of enmity; and it was the transgression of the first parent that made us enemies. 'Through the death of His Son: much more, being reconciled, shall we be saved in His life.'
If we have been saved through the death of Christ, how much more shall we be glorified in His life, if we imitate both His life and His death, and strive by the help of His precepts to persevere in their keeping. 'And not only so, but we also glory in God.' Not only shall the life of Christ be given us in that transformation of the resurrection, but glory also, as the Apostle John says: 'It has not yet appeared what we shall be; we know that when He shall appear, we shall be like Him.' 'Through our Lord Jesus Christ'—that through His grace we may merit His likeness, and be in the glory of God the Father. 'Through whom we have now received reconciliation.' Now reconciliation, then glory. 'Therefore, as by one man into this world…'
Hence he wishes to show that Christ suffered for this reason: that we who had departed from God through Adam might be reconciled through Christ. 'Sin entered'—by propagation and by example; for as, when there was no sin, it came through Adam, so too, when justice was with no one, it was recalled through Christ; and as through his sin came death, so through His justice came life. 'And through sin.' In this place, against the reckless error of Pelagian impiety, he strives to show that death was not made by God, but was brought in through the fault of transgression; because as through the sin of the first Adam salvation was lost, so through the justice of the second it was restored. Here the Apostle intends to assert that great was Adam's transgression, but richer is Christ's redemption.
And therefore he said: 'And not as by one man's sin, so also is the gift.' From one sin the former brought in death; from the abolition of many the latter restored life. And so justice prevailed more in giving life than sin in slaying. 'Death'—that of which he says, 'When you were dead in sins, He made you live together with Christ.' Death received its name from the bite of the serpent. 'And so'—as in him. 'Death passed upon all men.' Death, both of soul and of body, passed from original sin even upon Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob; yet they are made alive by the grace of God, of whom it is said, 'He is not the God of the dead'; as the Apostle also says, even upon those who did not sin.
That is, capital sin so passed upon men that not only did he die who transgressed, but also those who were begotten of transgressors are held liable through the bond of nature; that is, through all its branches the corrupted root transmitted its vice. Adam slew, Christ made alive. 'In whom all have sinned.' Either by the sin of disobedience, or in Adam the punishment of all who sin was foreshown. 'For until the law sin was in the world.' It must be asked what sin: that is, that sin alone was in force until the law which the prevarication of the first parent brought in; for the offense of transgression ceased before the coming of the law.
In the first age sinners enjoyed the liberty of the present life more securely. There was indeed sin before the law, from doing, but it was not so imputed, because the natural knowledge had already been almost blotted out, whose understanding, as though dead, revived through the law. The law came as the avenger of sin. 'But sin was not imputed, when there was no law.' It existed, but to rustic men it was not imputed, nor was it believed by others to be sin. 'But death reigned from Adam until Moses.' That is, death coming from the original evil reigned alone until the law. Therefore he said 'reigned,' because it had seized the whole world generally. Other sins by no means seemed to reign, because iniquity did not reign generally over all men.
For some measure of natural justice flourished in very many, as in many philosophers; and the other faults, though springing from a corrupted nature, were nevertheless voluntary. There followed another new thing—namely, the offense of prevarication when the law was despised. Therefore the obligation of the first man alone reigned by itself, working death until Moses. But from the time of the law another kind of offenses was added, unto the guilt of the neglected law, which before its promulgation could not be imputed. And thus, as new precepts entered in, iniquity was multiplied. For the law came, not that it might take away sin, but that it might display or judge it.
And therefore here the Apostle's teaching commends the abundance of grace, because the Redeemer's goodness pardoned not only Adam's debt, which alone had reigned until the law as with a tyrannical dominion, but also the innumerable offenses of prevarication and of reprobate conduct. For this reason he said, 'For judgment indeed was by one unto condemnation.' But what he says, 'until Moses,' that is, until the end of the law and the beginning of grace, the natural debt reigned; just as we say, for example, 'The Huns lasted until Attila'—by which we designate not the beginning of his reign but its end; so also 'until Moses,' that is, until the end of the law and the beginning of grace.
The remaining offenses, which were not understood to be sins until the beginning of the law—until the law should say, 'You shall not covet'—revived through the law. For original sin reigns even today until baptism, but it has lost the use of its usury since the blood of Christ blotted out the original bond. But someone will say: Why does the evil of origin still reign in many nations? To whom he replies: Then indeed the plague, widely diffused, reigned, when the physician was absent, when the general mortality laid all waste. But where remission, sent from heaven, opened the gate of paradise, death lost its power; and thus it does not reign, because its kingdom has been destroyed through the grace of Christ.
'Even upon those who did not sin after the similitude of the transgression of Adam, who is the figure of Him that was to come.' A figure of Him that was to come—a figure by contrast: as the one was a figure of sin, so this One of justice; or the one in a living soul, this One in a life-giving spirit. Adam was a figure of Christ: because as Adam was made by the hands of God without conjugal intercourse, so also Christ, God working, came forth from a virgin. 'But not as the offense, so also the gift. For if by the offense of one many died, much more the grace of God and the gift, in the grace of the one man Jesus Christ, has abounded unto many.' 'And not as by one sin, so also the gift'—that is, justice prevailed more in giving life than sin in slaying.
For Adam's sin slew both himself and his posterity; but Christ saved both those whom He found in the body, and His own manhood, and His posterity. But perhaps someone says: The flesh, which comes from the transgressor, justly draws original sin; but the soul, which is born innocent—whence does it draw original sin, so that if an unbaptized infant dies, it is damned forever? Let him hear and acknowledge that the soul rather sinned first in Adam, through the appetite of divinity, than the flesh. But in this place the opinion is altogether to be avoided which says: As the flesh comes from the flesh of Adam, so our soul is created from the soul of Adam by the hidden working of God. As a certain one said:
'By a hidden law nature pours forth its own work'—which, unless it be here freed by grace, shall be damned with perpetual punishment forever. 'For the judgment'—understand, of death. 'By one unto condemnation'—understand, the first man sinning, or the first sin. 'But grace, from many offenses, unto justification.' As though the first obligation of the old offense held dominion until Christ. But the other offenses before the prohibition of the law were not seen, or were not understood, to be so grave: therefore grace, coming, forgave through baptism not only the original debt but also the actual. And therefore from many offenses it justified. 'For if by one man's offense death reigned through one'—that is, through Adam's transgression—'much more the abundance of grace.'
Greater is the redemption of the Saviour than the perdition of the transgressor: because through Christ all sins have been remitted, not only original but also actual. 'And those who receive of the gift and of justice shall reign in life through one, Jesus Christ.' Because both that we may live justly and that we may reign with Him, has been granted by the bounty of His gift. Let us hear of the gifts; of our own merits let us be silent. 'Therefore as by the offense of one unto all men to condemnation, so also by the justice of one unto all men to justification of life.' 'Death reigned'—understood. He therefore who is freed from this condemnation, let him love grace; he who is not freed, let him acknowledge the debt. If in remitting the debt goodness is understood, in exacting it equity.
For nowhere is iniquity found with God. 'For as by the disobedience of one man many were made sinners, so also by the obedience of one shall many be made just.' As by the example of Adam's disobedience many sinned, so also by the obedience of Christ many are justified. Great is the crime of disobedience, which whatever Christian shall have, it empties out whatever good he shall have done. 'Obedience,' He says, 'I desire rather than sacrifice.' 'But the law entered in, that the offense might abound.' Lest they should say to us: The law remitted sins. 'It came not,' he says, 'to remit, but to display'; and when it was despised, the offense began to abound through knowledge—as though he should say: As I see, the law did not lessen sins but added to them, yet not by its own fault, but by theirs.
'The law,' he says, 'entered in, that the offense might abound'—which was emptied out by the bounty of the grace that came upon it. Openly, then, from this testimony we perceive that the Apostle speaks of two kinds of sins, which came either from natural or from legal transgression; where, having explained the natural cause, he added the legal, saying: 'Where sin abounded, grace did more abound.' 'But where sin abounded'—the whole sense is this: The old Adam by one offense brought in death; the new Adam, from the indulgence of innumerable offenses, gave salvation. 'Where,' he says, 'sin abounded'—because, the law having been received, sin is perpetrated not with ignorance but with knowledge. Therefore the offense begins to abound. 'Grace did more abound.'
'That as sin reigned unto death.' As the Saviour says: 'To whom more is forgiven, he loves more.' The magnitude of sin was made manifest, that they might know the greatness of grace, and render a greatness of charity, and that from the indulgence of remission the debt of charity might grow. 'So also may grace reign through justice unto life eternal, through Jesus Christ our Lord.' The benefits are made manifest when, on the contrary, they are compared with the merits of the unworthy: for death reigned through Adam, life through Christ. That as the kingdom of sin was confirmed through the law despised, which took away the excuse of ignorance, so also the kingdom of grace may be confirmed through the remission of many sins. CHAPTER VI.—What shall we say then?
'Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?' Here is inserted the objection of those who, still understanding little, could say: If grace grows in the magnitude of offenses, we ought to sin, that grace may abound, that His munificence may be able to abound more and more in sinners. 'God forbid.' God forbid. They speak so unskillfully who are still found to be weak. But let us who have already died to sin, that we might live to grace, reject the persuasion of this ignorance. 'For we who have died to sin, how shall we still live in it?' He wishes the baptized to be so firm and so perfect as one who, with respect to committing capital crimes, is in a manner compared to a dead man: so that he ought no longer to sin—that is, to commit crime.
'Or are you ignorant that all we who have been baptized in Christ Jesus…' Or are you perhaps ignorant of the sacrament of His baptism itself? In the Scriptures there are three kinds of baptisms: of water, as John's; of the Spirit, which is also fire, as in the Acts of the Apostles—the Holy Spirit descended as it were as fire, of whose deity he shows in another place: 'Our God,' he says, 'is a consuming fire.' The third kind is baptism in blood, whereby the martyrs are baptized; whence the Lord Himself, though already baptized, testifies in the Gospel: 'I have a baptism to be baptized with, which you know not.' As we read in the epistle of the Apostle John: 'There are three that bear witness: water, blood, and the Spirit'—one in ministry, not in nature.
Water is by figure a witness of the Lord's burial; blood is a witness of His death; the Spirit is a witness of the resurrection, because the Spirit is the author of life. 'We have been baptized in His death.' We are baptized in the death of Christ, that, believing in His death, we might live as though dead—we to whom there should be nothing common with this world, and for whom the whole world was to die by the example of its Author, as many saints either have done or do; because Christ died for all. Therefore all are dead, that those who live may live no longer to themselves, but to Him who died for them. 'And now not I live, but Christ lives in me.' And, 'To me the world is crucified, and I to the world.'
For it cannot come to pass but that, the head being dead, all the members die together with it. For the head bore the punishments for all the members, that all the members might die in Him, and thus, being dead to sin, might live to God. For as a dead man cannot sin, so also we, who have died together with Christ, ought not to be entangled in capital sins. He who is crucified does nothing else but await the hour of death, and into the hands of the Father commends his spirit. More fully it must be inquired what ought to be understood by 'we have been baptized in His death.'
The Apostle enjoins that, because for our sake Christ was crucified, died and was buried, and rose again, we too, unto the likeness of His passion, should crucify our own wills and desires, and in the mystery of baptism imitate the example of His death, burial, and resurrection; so that if we have been companions of His sufferings, we may be also of His consolations. But it must be asked how one placed in life can die, and, not yet dead, be buried; and, not yet buried, how he can be raised up. In this way, surely: while from sons of perdition we are made sons of adoption, we die beforehand to our former nature by a second birth; and while we are submerged under the kindred element of earth, we are buried; while we rise up from the bosom of the font, we are raised.
And from this the sacrament of baptism is very great. And therefore he said: 'We were buried together with Him through baptism unto death.' And in what follows: 'If,' he says, 'we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live together with Christ.' We must labor, therefore, that nothing of the filth of the old man may be recognized in us; whence, if any of us is perchance forestalled by a fault, let him be washed clean through penitence by the gift of the Lord. If, then, we shall have been new and changed in conduct, likewise new and changed shall we be made in glory. 'Knowing that our old man is crucified together.' He is called the old man who either is not yet seen to have put off the old and earthly Adam, or imitates the same, having relapsed into the mire of his former life.
But as that Redeemer hung up an innocent body, so let us hang up our guilty body away from vices. In which mystery of the cross Moses hung up the brazen serpent upon a pole, 'that the body of sin may be destroyed'—that is, that vice may be destroyed not in part but wholly. 'For we were buried together with Him through baptism unto death.' In the example of Christ, to imitate Him, we are buried together in baptism, that, being dead to our old crimes, we may renounce the devil and his pomps. He shows that we are so baptized as to be buried together with Christ. 'That as Christ rose from the dead by the glory of the Father'—that as the Father is glorified through the resurrection of the Son, so also may He be glorified through the newness of our conduct. 'So we also may walk in newness of life.'
He shows how, living, we can be dead, and ought to will or desire nothing that they will or desire who are not new. 'For if we have been planted together in the likeness of His death, we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection.' If we have been buried together, we shall be also partakers of the resurrection. If we have not been planted together, neither shall we rise together; and if we shall have been new in life, we shall be new in glory. If we shall have had the likeness of His death, we shall have also that of His resurrection. 'Knowing this, that our old man is crucified together'—those who by imitating the old and earthly man were sinning. For by the old man is understood Adam, as by the new, Christ. 'That the body of sin may be destroyed.' One vice is a member of sin.
But the body is the totality of offenses, whose beginning is original sin. But Christ was crucified not in part, but whole, that we might wholly die to sin and live to God; or that our body might be destroyed from the servitude of sin, and become the bondservant of justice, which was wont to be of offense. 'That we may no longer serve sin.' For everyone who commits sin is the servant of sin. 'For he who has died is justified from sin'—that is, he is estranged from sin, he can no longer sin; for the crucified man, all his members being possessed by pain, cannot sin, but contradicts his concupiscences and passions. 'But if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live together with Christ.'
As he says also elsewhere: 'If we have died together, we shall also live together.' 'Knowing that Christ rising from the dead now dies no more.' So also we, if we shall have died to vices, shall not fear the second death. Or certainly thus: as Christ can no longer be crucified again for you if you live criminally, so also you cannot be baptized again; as he says elsewhere: 'It is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have been made partakers, to be renewed again unto penitence, crucifying again to themselves the Son of God'—to whom he forbids not penitence but renovation, that is, the repetition of baptism. 'Death shall no more have dominion over Him.'
If death shall no longer have dominion, then it once did have dominion—against the Manichees, because they deny that Christ had true flesh. 'For in that He died, He died to sin.' Either that He died for the sin of the human race, or that He died to death itself, which could have no further place in Him. 'He died once'—that is, as your head died once, so you also, being made His members, follow the examples of His life, that you may owe nothing further to death; that is, that in you the second death may have no place. For he who believes that baptism can be repeated believes that Christ can be crucified again. 'But in that He lives, He lives to God.' He lives in deity, the very Man being God. 'So also reckon yourselves'—understand yourselves as sons or members of Him.
'Indeed dead to sin.' As His imitator said: 'Now not I live, but Christ lives in me.' 'But alive'—that is, following His life, we do not yet live in ourselves, but already we all live in Christ. For we are dead, and our life is hidden with Christ in God. 'To God in Christ Jesus.' But he lives to God who follows the footsteps of Christ in humility, sanctification, and piety. 'Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that you should obey its concupiscences.' He shows how it reigns. For he reigns whom all obey. How sin reigns in the body he has explained—that is, if we yield obedience to the corrupted nature and consent. He did not say, 'Let it not be,' because it is already there; but,
'Let it not reign'—that is, let not what it commands be done. Anger rises: do not give to anger a tongue for cursing, nor a hand for striking, nor your members to lust; which would not rise unless sin were in our members. Sin is indeed present in the members, but it does not reign if its desires are not obeyed. And therefore, while one does what he does not will—that is, he does not will to covet, yet covets—he 'consents to the law, that it is good'; for he too wills what the law wills, because he himself wills not to covet, and the law has said, 'You shall not covet.' 'But neither yield your members as weapons of iniquity unto sin.' If any member shall have turned its office to evil uses, it is made a weapon of iniquity for storming justice:
if the hand for theft, the tongue for lying or blasphemy; if the eye should serve concupiscence for storming chastity, and the rest. 'But present yourselves to God as those alive from the dead.' As though you had already risen; but after the resurrection one does not live carnally, nor sin. 'And your members as weapons of justice unto God.' That the eye which before looked to sin might now look to the ministry of good work; which before looked to plunder might now look to clothe: thus also consider concerning the remaining members, that they may be changed from iniquity to mercy. 'For sin shall not have dominion over you.' Let not sin conquer you; for you are not little ones, but perfect—as a schoolmaster might say to a boy:
'Do not make a fault of speech, for you no longer hear the grammarian, but the orator.' Or 'shall not have dominion' means, it has no right to have dominion. 'For you are not under the law, but under grace.' That is, under the benevolence of the Redeemer, who gave both the effort of fighting and of conquering, and furnished doctrine; but also besides, gave an example, and virtue through the consolation of the Holy Spirit, through which we are freed from the dominion of sin. 'What then? Shall we sin because we are not under the law?' He who is under the law is oppressed by the law, while he does not fulfill the law; he is not under the law, but with the law. 'But under grace? God forbid. Do you not know that to whom you yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants you are whom you have obeyed—whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto justice?'
Lest the untaught and those raw in faith should object: Therefore, the vindication of the law having ceased, we shall sin with impunity. God forbid. The grace which also gave us the means whereby we conquer does not will us to sin at all: if you shall have willed to sin, the sentence of the law, which takes vengeance on sinners, shall have dominion over you. But if you shall have served justice, you are not under the law, but under grace. 'For,' he says, 'you cannot serve two masters.' Here, what he said—'we shall sin'—let us understand of criminal and capital sins, not of the minute ones, without which we cannot be. Understand this too everywhere that we are forbidden to sin; because he was speaking of those very sins which the law also was wont to condemn, according to that: 'If we say that we have no sin,' etc.
But thanks be to God that you were the servants of sin. Thanks be to God, because you were such; but now, through his own delivering and helping, you are so no longer: for you obey, for you resist, with God as your helper. Now you have obeyed. That you may live by the gift and the example of Christ, who granted and taught the taking away not only of sins but even of the occasions of transgressions. 'Be imitators of me,' he says, 'as I also am of Christ' — from the heart, from faith. Into that form of doctrine into which you have been delivered: namely, the New Testament. And having been freed from sin: that is, made free. You have been made the servants of righteousness: through the grace of God. I speak after the manner of men: because you cannot yet hear what is divine. Or thus: what I say is worthy of human nature, since it holds good even among men and can easily be understood. That is:
I ought indeed to demand greater things of you as a return for the divine servitude; but condescending to and tempering myself to your weakness, I proclaim and urge things human and possible: that as you were ready to pursue what was harmful and contrary, so you may be eager to accomplish the things that are useful and friendly to salvation. I speak because of the infirmity of the flesh. The body which is corrupted weighs down the soul, because whatever the soul does carnally is reckoned to the flesh; and when the soul does heavenly things, the whole man is spiritual. A man is carnal if he is overcome by concupiscences; spiritual, when by the gift of God he overcomes the concupiscences.
For just as you presented your members to be in bondage, so now, with the will changed, let us present ourselves to serve righteousness — not like the Manichaeans, who say that the nature of the body has sin so implanted in it by its very constitution that it cannot overcome it; but, being renewed by grace, let us not present our members unto evil. For the body is not of itself evil, but the will, which we are commanded to change; and this will is known to be present through the vice of nature by reason of the transgressor's guilt, not by its constitution. Unto uncleanness and iniquity: that is, unto luxury or idolatry. Unto iniquity: unto the doing of iniquity. So now present your members to serve righteousness: that, as you were perfected in evil through original sin, so you may be perfected in good through the gift of grace;
so that the hand which formerly plundered may now reach out in mercy; and the feet which formerly ran to evil may now run to visit the sick and go into the prison for a good work; and the eyes which formerly looked to covet and to seize may now look to have compassion and to give freely. Behold, thus let our members be changed. Unto sanctification: that you may receive sanctification, or possess it. For when you were the servants of sin, you were free from righteousness. That is, in nothing did you serve righteousness. So also now be free from sin, that you may serve it in nothing. Behold, it is shown that they could not so much as be able to sin except by serving under another kind of bondage. Therefore they are not free from righteousness except by the choice of the will.
But they are not freed from sin except by the grace of the Saviour. He called them free with respect to righteousness, not freed; but with respect to sin he called them not free, lest they should attribute this to themselves, but freed: that is, 'if the Son shall make you free, then shall you be free indeed.' What fruit therefore had you then in those things whereof you are now ashamed? What sort of fruit had you in that deed, at the very recollection of which there is shame? Whoever comes to know himself as good is ashamed to have been evil. And whoever is ashamed of himself as being good, is evil, because he has no fruit in the present, and his end is death. For the end of those things — of the evil things, that is — is death: a perpetual punishment. But now being freed from sin. Note that he said 'freed,' so that we may give the glory not to ourselves but to God.
But being made servants to God, you have your fruit unto sanctification, and the end everlasting life. To abide in the service of God — this very thing is already fruit, namely that you live, being sanctified through baptism. Now the servant of God does not render evil to his enemies in turn, as Joseph, who said to his brothers: 'Fear not, for I am a servant of God.' The servants of God, moreover, have in the present their fruit — the gift of the Holy Spirit — and their end everlasting life, or the sanctification of a good life. Therefore in this present life, in that part in which we are servants to God, we are free from sin; but in that part in which we still serve the law, we are still servants of sin. And therefore he said: 'For I delight in the law of God according to the inward man.' Behold, whence are we free, whence do we delight in the law of God?
For freedom brings delight: for as long as you do what is just out of fear, God does not delight you. For the wages of sin is death. Recompense is called wages. Rightly then is it called wages, because eternal death is rendered to devilish malice as a debt owed. He who serves as a soldier for sin receives death as his pay. But the grace of God is life eternal, in Christ Jesus our Lord: the grace under which you now are. And at the same time it is to be noted that he did not say 'the wages of righteousness,' because we do not have that of ourselves. Therefore, although it is not ours but of grace, yet, kept by the help of God, it gives life eternal when this life's span is finished. CHAPTER VII. — Do you not know, brethren (for I speak to them that know the law)?
Here he begins to show the difficulty of the law, in order to exhort them to live without fear under grace: for now, its active force having ceased, the law does not live for us, but for itself; and it lives in the New Testament, through which it is reformed. Because the law has dominion over a man for as long as it lives. For the woman that has a husband is bound by the law to her husband while he lives. But if her husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. He introduces a comparison: by the 'husband' he means the commandment of the law; by the 'woman' he means the people, or the soul, so as to show that the law, which works wrath, being without effect, as it were dead — now that we are mortified — cannot hinder us from being able to belong to him who rose from the dead: which law would rightly live for us if it found in us something to punish.
For he says that a man is under the law for as long as he lives in sin. But this sin is to be understood as that which came in by way of the law. For where there is not the grace of the liberator, the prohibition of sins increases the desire of sinning. Therefore, while her husband lives, she shall be called an adulteress if she be with another man; but if her husband be dead, she is freed from the law, so that she is not an adulteress if she be with another man. As long as the husband lives, so long must she live according to his will. But if the husband sleep, and the woman be joined to another husband, she must no longer live according to the custom of the former husband. Therefore, my brethren, you also are become dead to the law. Following the analogy of the body, he did not wish to say 'the law is dead to you;'
but he left it to the understanding, as in many places. According to the comparison, he ought rather to have said that the law was dead to them than that they were dead to the law; but because to say this among the Jews still seemed intractable, he left it to the understanding: showing plainly enough that the law was not able to take away sin, but rather increased it — the sin which grace takes away — since the law knows how to command, though weakness succumbs to it, but not how to help, which is the work of the grace of Christ. From this passage, and throughout this whole reading, up to 'Who shall deliver me from the body of this death,' the Apostle sees that a man placed under the law is transfigured into himself, in whose words he speaks in his own person, even the man who had said:
We have been made void from the law of death, in which we were held, so that we may serve in newness of the spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter. Through these words he seems to have found fault with the law, but it is not so, because he added: 'Is the law sin? God forbid,' and the rest. This truly is an ear that does not lie. The flesh being crucified — through which sin had dominion over us by condemning — now has no active force. Formerly they were imitators of Moses; but now, of Christ; thus it is said, 'You are dead to the law,' as if it were said, 'You are dead to the punishment of the law.' Why are we dead to the law through the body of Christ, if the law is good? Because we are dead to the law that has dominion: freed from that effect which the law punishes and condemns. For it is more commonly called 'the law' when it threatens and terrifies and takes vengeance.
And so the same precept is law to those who fear, but grace to those who love. Through the body of Christ, by dying together with Christ, who condemned sin in the flesh. That you should belong to another who rose from the dead. 'Another husband' is to be understood. That you may bring forth fruit unto God. He brings forth fruit by whose example the people of God grows, as he says: 'That we may have some fruit among you.' For when we were in the flesh — when we were in a carnal manner of life — the passion of concupiscence wrought in the eyes and the other members, which passions were nevertheless shown by the law to be sins, that they might bring forth fruit unto the death of sin. 'In the flesh,' he says: that is, that we should be held bound by carnal desires. The passions of sins, which were by the law, wrought in our members.
That man dies to these passions who already in mind serves the law of God, although the passions themselves are not yet dead. He says that concupiscence is increased when the law forbids it: an increase of concupiscence arising from the prohibition, and the guilt of punishment from the transgression. This is 'that through the good it wrought death.' 'That they might bring forth fruit unto death.' That is, that the severity of the law might slay us who were set in these same passions, and furnish fruit unto death out of our perdition, because the fruit of sin is death. We bring forth fruit unto death while we do the things forbidden. But now we are loosed from the law, dying. The law of death, which slays sinners, that is, the guilty; but it is also called the law of sin, not because it is itself sin, but because it is imposed upon sinners.
Therefore it is also called the law of death, because the wages of sin is death, and the sting of death is sin, but the strength of sin is the law. 'In which we were held' — we were held through sin. 'So that we may serve in newness of the spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter' — obedient to the precepts of spiritual grace, not following the letter of the law. What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Because he had said that the passions through the law brought forth fruit unto death, therefore he raises the objection against himself: Is the law sin? And he answers: God forbid. He does this against the Manichaeans, who deny the Old Testament. And if they should say, 'He here asserts the law only because of the Jews, because he feared scandal,' it must be answered: Then he always feared scandal, because he never spoke against the law.
Since therefore in many places he has overthrown the works of the law, now he rightly praises it in that respect in which it is spiritual, and by this commendation of it confounds the Manichaeans. God forbid. For lest anyone, on account of these testimonies, should disparage the law and contend that it is evil, the Apostle foresaw what might occur to those who misunderstand, and proposed to himself this same question. 'What shall we say then?' he says, 'Is the law sin? God forbid. But I did not know sin except through the law.' This he had already said above: 'through the law is the knowledge of sin.' It is therefore not the taking away of sin, but the knowledge of it.
For it was given, not that it might take away sin nor that it might root it out, but only that it might be revealed; so that, since sin cannot be overcome without the grace of God, the very anxiety of guilt might compel a man to flee for refuge to grace. 'But I did not know sin except through the law. For I had not known concupiscence, unless the law had said: You shall not covet.' Here the Apostle begins to speak as it were of himself, and to give an example from himself — he who had lived under the law, which of itself does not save, but reveals sin; for it neither takes away nor justifies, but takes vengeance upon transgressors. He does not say, 'I did not commit sin except through the law,' but, 'I did not know sin except through the law,' which showed that concupiscence is sin — a thing which I did not know to be sin.
'I did not know concupiscence,' he says. He did not say, 'I did not have it' or 'I did not do it,' but 'I did not know it to be sin.' Whence it appears that concupiscence was not implanted by the law, but revealed by it — the law which teaches what each one ought to do or to avoid. But the true man is still dragged along by the habit of transgressing: for concupiscence belongs to our nature, coming in through sin, not by God's constitution. And therefore that evil itself is not to be separated by any sundering from God, but to be healed by the mercy of God. But taking occasion. Here the Apostle recalls his past life, when he was living under the law, and the struggle of his youth. And when he says, 'But I was alive without the law once,' he indicates his earliest age:
'But when the commandment came,' he says, 'sin revived; but I died.' He testifies that he was already capable of the precept, but not effective in it. And so, that he might show himself a transgressor of the law, the Apostle knew that inwardly he had been such before the grace of God, which is through Jesus Christ our Lord. And to the Ephesians he confesses this most openly: 'Among whom,' he says, 'we all also had our conversation in times past, in the desires of the flesh and of our thoughts: and we were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest,' and so on. And to Titus: 'For we ourselves also,' he says, 'were sometime foolish, unbelieving, erring,' and the rest that follows there. Such was he before grace. Sin wrought through the commandment.
Just as one who envies then all the more receives occasion for doing harm, when something is entrusted to the one whom he wishes to harm. 'In me all concupiscence' — all that is written in the law: 'You shall not covet your neighbour's wife, nor his field, nor anything of your neighbour's,' and the rest. The weakness of the human mind has this quality, through transgression, that things forbidden can be observed with greater difficulty. For without the law sin was dead: that is, it lay hidden, it did not appear, it was unknown, it seemed to me to be dead; or the natural law, which showed what sin was, had fallen into oblivion. Therefore the law was also given in writing, to bring the law of nature to remembrance. 'But I was alive once' — I seemed to myself to live as one just and free from sin. 'Without the law.'
Whence he makes it plain that he speaks not properly in his own person, but generally in the person of man. 'But when the commandment came' — that is, it had come to be that sin was in oblivion; but when the commandment came, sin was recognized, so that everyone who has done it may know himself to be dead. 'Revived.' That is, it shone forth and appeared. 'Revived,' he says, not 'lived'; for it had once lived in Paradise, when what was committed against the given precept was plainly enough manifest. 'Sin revived, but I died.' That is, that which had been hidden appeared, because it had lived through natural knowledge and had been dead through oblivion: because I, now knowing, transgressed, and I perceived myself to be dead by the manifestation of sin:
because he now sins by way of transgression who sees through the law what he ought not to do, and yet does it — whether by titillation, or by delight, even if not by consent; or because the guilt of transgression threatens him with the certain punishment of death. 'And the commandment was found by me.' That which, being kept, made progress unto life, this, being neglected, they lose unto death: because, knowing it, I did not keep it. All this is that he may show that the law was indeed given unto life, but because it gave no help whereby we might be saved, that it might lead us to grace, which has everything — mercy, help, and example. 'That which was unto life, this proved to be unto death.' If you wish to come unto life, keep the commandments. The commandment kept bestows life;
if not kept, death — which is transgression. For sin, taking occasion. If he seems to say anything against the law, he imputes it to those who were not able to receive more perfect things. Therefore he said there was an occasion of sin. Through the commandment. Because the persuasion to transgress is more vehement unto sin when the prohibition is present, and it makes a man not only a sinner but also a transgressor. Because, then, by men not yet receiving spiritual grace, what is forbidden is admitted more agreeably, sin deceives by a false sweetness: but because the guilt of transgression comes upon it, it also slays — because it embraces, as the price of deadly pleasure, that sweetness by which it is deceived, and it delights even to act against the law: and the less it is permitted, the more it pleases.
'It seduced me, and by it slew me.' For there is no sin except that which is committed by coveting. Accordingly, the law which forbids this is good and praiseworthy. But where the Holy Spirit helps, breathing in a good concupiscence in place of the evil one — that is, pouring forth charity in our hearts — surely that law, however good, increases evil desire by forbidding it. Just as the impetus of water, if the burden does not cease on that side, becomes more vehement when an obstacle is set against it; and when it has overcome that mass, being hurled headlong with greater accumulation, it rushes down more violently along the slopes. For somehow this very thing which is coveted becomes more delightful while it is forbidden. And this is what sin does — it deceives through the commandment, and by it slays:
when transgression also comes upon it, which is nought. And so the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just. Against the assailants of the law, and against those who separate righteousness from goodness, the law is called both holy and good, and grace is called just. For 'unless your righteousness shall abound,' and the rest. But God is sometimes called good in the Old Testament, and in the New is called just: as is that saying, 'Just Father.' And this is against the Marcionites. Yet nothing is rightly done through the law without grace, because it was not given as something that could give life, but was set down as a cause of transgression; that it might shut up those convicted under sin — not for the justifying of the impious, but for the convicting of the proud, being set down as a cause of transgression. And it is against the Manichaeans, because it is praised;
and against the Pelagians, because no one is justified by the law; and therefore, for the giving of life to those whom the letter slays, the spirit of grace freely brings aid. For nothing is rightly done through it, as has been said, without grace: because it was not given as something that could give life. And good — to those who keep it. Was then that which is good made death to me? God forbid. It was not the commandment itself that of itself became the cause of death to me; but I make it so for myself, who by sinning commit things worthy of death. In him who uses it ill, indeed, is the fault, not in the commandment itself, which is good, since the law is good. But sin, that it might appear as sin, through the good wrought death in me. Through the law sin appears, and through the same it is punished.
Therefore through the good — that is, through the law, which is good if one uses it lawfully — it works death in me, when I am made a transgressor of it. That sin might become sinning above measure through the commandment. The greatness of iniquity requires that man be now called not a sinner but sin itself. Before the law the appetite for sin had a measure, through ignorance; that which is knowingly committed is above measure. For we know. That is, that the law commands things arduous, but spiritual; but I, since I am titillated according to carnal habit, dissent from its perfection — the perfect destroys the imperfect. That the law is spiritual. This has been expounded. It commands the works which are of the spirit: whence he shows that the law cannot be fulfilled except by a spiritual man. But I am carnal.
I who receive the law am accustomed to live carnally: that is, consenting to the flesh, not yet freed by spiritual grace. For it is good not to covet: and this good the just man wills, who lives by faith, and yet does what he hates, because he covets, although he does not go after his concupiscences. But if he does so, then truly he himself does it — so as to yield, so as to consent, so as to obey the desire of sin. Sold under sin. That is, the price of temporal pleasure. Between the seller and the buyer, in this place, this is proved to be the transaction. The enemy proposes the counsel of iniquity, and receives the assent of the will. I therefore receive, as the price of lost innocence, the very pleasure of sinning and the deadly sweetness from an unjust delight.
'You have been sold to your sins,' he says, lest anyone should suppose him not yet redeemed by the blood of Christ; but he awaits redemption, that is, immortality. Or 'sold under sin' in the first transgression of the precept, so that he might have a corruptible body, which weighs down the soul. But now, like a bought slave, he is compelled to serve lust. For what I work, I understand not. Do I not understand that to be evil which I unwillingly admit? How does he not understand who does that which he does not will, and does that which he hates? It is no small sign of understanding to hate one's fault: therefore 'what I work, I understand not' — that is, I do not consent, I do not approve, I do not do it, and however overcome, I judge it to be contrary:
and I clearly understand it not to be right, I do not acknowledge it to be among the precepts of truth. For what I will, that good, I do not. Up to this point these are the words of a man, as some think, set under the law, not yet under grace: so that a man, even if he be unwilling to sin, is overcome by sin, for carnal habit has grown strong, and the natural bond of mortality. Lest perhaps from these words anyone should suspect the holy Apostle of consenting to the concupiscence of the flesh unto evil works, let him consider what he added: 'But if I do that which I will not, I consent to the law, that it is good': for he says that he rather consents to the law than to the concupiscence of the flesh — for this he calls by the name of sin.
He said therefore that he 'does' it, not by the disposition of consenting and fulfilling, but by the very motion of coveting. But the evil which I hate, that I do. For it is good not to covet: and this good the just man wills, who lives by faith, and yet does what he hates, because he covets, although he does not go after his concupiscences: but if he does so, then truly he himself does it, so as to yield, so as to consent, so as to obey the desire of sin. But if what I hate, that I do. That is, while I am unwilling to do what I commit, I certainly agree with the law, which neither wills the evil nor forbids it; and therefore I consent to it in mind but contradict it in deed, and thus one thing conscience works in me, another thing weakness, which succumbs to the yoke of sin, though judgment contradicts;
he said therefore that he 'does' and 'works' it, not by the disposition of consenting and fulfilling, but by the very motion of coveting. I consent to the law, that it is good. Because I do not will what it does not will, I consent to it by the law of conscience: because what I will not, that I do. But now. Now already under grace, which has freed me from consent. Now it is no more I that work it. That is, I do not consent. For if he both covets and consents and acts, how does he not himself work it? Even though he himself grieves to work it, and groans heavily at being overcome. 'It is no more I that work it': that is, not the inner mind: nor do I consent to present my members as weapons of iniquity. Before the law forbade, I did it willingly of myself; but after the law came, I sin unwillingly, because I am overcome by habit.
But it is sin that dwells in me. It dwells as a guest, and lords it, and as one thing in another — not as one — the still carnal affection dwells in me. For I know that it dwells no more in me. From what he knows, he consents to the law; from what he does, he yields to sin: so that it prevails in me as though it seemed inborn — which indeed is not constituted by God, but proceeds from a vitiated nature. Here he begins to say that he himself had the titillation of the flesh. It is also to be noted that the Apostle testifies that he felt that very titillation. That is, in my flesh — good. He did not say, 'My flesh is not good,' but 'good does not dwell in my flesh,' which the habit of sin depresses, a thing which I am unable to overcome:
because, while I confide in the work of the law, I do not seek the help of grace. But this which indwells came into all men from the propagation of mortality through the transgressor. For to will is present with me. There is indeed in me a will prepared and given by God, but there is not the effect: because carnal habit resists the will itself, still in this mortal life. Some judge that these are the words of a man set under the law, not yet under grace. But to accomplish that which is good, I find not. Without the support of grace I find not the effect of good will. For that there is a willing, the will has already been prepared by God: because it is he who works in us even to will. And this too is to be noted, that he did not say, 'To do good I find not,' but 'to accomplish':
for what is the perfection of good, but the extinction of evil? The perfection of good is not to covet: for what is easier for a man set under the law than to will the good and to do the evil? For this is to accomplish good — that a man should not even covet. Imperfect is the good, when he covets, even if he does not consent to the concupiscence unto evil. 'I find not' — that is, I cannot. For the good that I will, this I do not; but the evil which I will not, this I do. Habit prevailing, I do what I will not: just as if one has grown accustomed to swearing, he lapses into it when he does not think of it. But if I do that which I will not, that I do. He said therefore that he 'does' and 'works' it, not by the disposition of consenting and fulfilling, but by the very motion of coveting. It is no more I that work it. Not I, because I do it unwillingly;
but it is I, because I myself, by the force of habit, imposed this necessity upon myself. But it is sin that dwells in me. There dwells in me the habit of sin, which through the transgression of the first parent was poured into me from a vitiated nature. I find then a law, to me who would do good. In mind I find a law to do good against the evil which is in my flesh. I have a law agreeable to the inner man, so that the evil which is in me through vitiated nature may be shut out: but this cannot be done without the grace of God. Therefore I say: Who shall deliver me from the body of this death? Since evil is present with me. That is, evil desires, or the counsels of the enemy, or the wars of the flesh, which by inveterate consent I have grown accustomed to obey.
But evil is present out of concupiscence, to which he does not consent who said, 'It is no more I that work it.' For I delight in the law of God. Here he sets down two laws: the law of the spirit, and the law of the flesh, which resists the law of the mind: that is, either the natural conscience, or the divine law, which resides in the mind. For freedom brings delight: for as long as you do what is just out of fear, God does not delight you: as long as he does not delight you, you still act as a slave. Let him delight you, and set you free. The law delights me, that which the law commands delights me, righteousness itself delights me. According to the inner man. According to the mind. But I see another law in my members. This is the weakness that has remained.
warring against the law of my mind, and taking me captive in the law of sin, which is in my members. On this side he perceives captivity, where righteousness is not fulfilled. But I see another law in my members: the desires of the flesh and the motions of vitiated nature, that is, concupiscence. But this concupiscence, if it is called sin, is so called because it was made by sin, thus is it called: just as a man's handwriting is called 'a hand,' because the hand made it; but sins are those things which are done unlawfully according to the concupiscence of the flesh. He calls a 'law in his members' the very burden of mortality, in which, being weighed down, we groan. The body which is corrupted weighs down the soul: whereby it often happens that what is not permitted delights us even against our will:
which burden he therefore calls a 'law,' because it was imposed by right of punishment. Warring against the law of my mind. Which elsewhere he commands to be mortified in the members: 'Mortify,' he says, 'your members.' The law, he says, of God: which is in the mind. And taking me captive. He laments that he is a captive: because he feels desires rising up in himself contrary to the purity of the mind; against which he implores the grace of the liberator. And this can also be understood, that he called the captivity of the flesh, not of the mind; by occasion, not by consent; and therefore 'taking me captive,' because even in the flesh itself there is not an alien nature, but our own. The Apostle may also seem to be describing one who still lives under the law, not yet under grace. What he says, 'taking me captive,' that is, my flesh:
to the law of sin, which is in my members. But even if it is taken as of himself, not that he himself was defiled with immoderate lust, but that, free from evil consent, he yet groaned over the concupiscence of the flesh — which by moderation he bridled — with such humility and piety that he wished rather not to have it than to master it. In the law of sin, which is in my members. Which condemns sin, or the evil habit, which is in the members: as if he said, 'and taking me captive in its own law.' Therefore a captive, because he does not do what he wills. As long as the flesh lusts against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh. Unhappy man that I am, who shall deliver me? — I who am thus tempted.
These are the words of a man established under grace, whose action indeed has the mortality of the flesh resisting it, yet not prevailing so as to consent to sin. Who would deny that the Apostle, when he said these things, was still in the body of this death? From it not even the impious are freed, they to whom their same bodies are restored for eternal torments. To be freed, therefore, from the body of this death is this: once every languor of the flesh's concupiscence has been healed, to receive the body not unto punishment but unto glory; as he also says elsewhere: 'And we ourselves groan within ourselves, awaiting the adoption, the redemption of our body.' For he prays that he may be freed from the vices of the body that bring death. 'If the Son,' he says, 'shall have set you free, you shall be free indeed.' Concerning the body of death.
of this? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. The body of death is the letter that kills. The body of death is deadly pleasure, and carnal delight, and bodily weakness, and the violence of habit, which drags one to death. From this habit not the law, but grace sets free, through our Lord Jesus Christ. Before the law there was no struggle against the pleasures of this world, because everything was permitted; but under the law there is a struggle, yet we are conquered; under grace, however, we struggle, and with God's help we conquer, because we serve not through fear but through love.
From this body of death not everyone is set free who ends this life, but he who in this life has received grace, and, lest he receive it in vain, has acted and cooperated with good works. For it is one thing to depart from this body, another to be set free from the body of this death: which the grace of God alone bestows. 'Therefore I myself.' He recapitulates or concludes. 'With the mind I serve the law of God.' As long as I am carnal, I am twofold. 'But with the flesh.' With the flesh he serves the law of sin by coveting; with the mind, the law of God, by not consenting to that same concupiscence. A man of a twofold and double will: that is, either carnal or spiritual, in a certain way divided within himself according to the quality of his works. The law indeed is one, but there are two kinds of commandments:
one that teaches good, another that forbids evil. What teaches good is of God; what forbids evil concerns our own vice, we for whom the law had to be given, we who sin. 'To the law of sin,' that is, to habit, or to corrupted nature, for as long as sickness struggles against health, and the flesh lusts against the spirit. CHAPTER VIII. 'There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus.' For no one is condemned except him who consents to the concupiscence of the flesh unto evil; for once the flesh is dead, he has in himself nothing that can be condemned. 'Who walk not according to the flesh': who have learned from Christ to crucify the flesh, and do not live carnally. 'For the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set me free.' Note that he calls grace 'law.'
The grace of the New Testament frees us from the habit of sin and death, by also taking away the occasions, and by giving help and an example for living, namely, that the concupiscence of the flesh may not claim my consent for itself. 'From the law of sin and death,' which kills and puts sinners to death: that is, by the law of the letter, or from that law which above he had said reigns in the members. 'For what was impossible for the law.' Since the law brings nothing to perfection, it was impossible for the law to make carnal men keep the righteousness of faith; but Christ made this possible by precept, by example, and by help.
For it is impossible to fulfill the law through the flesh, by which the proud, being ignorant of God's righteousness—that is, the righteousness which is from God for man that he may be righteous—and wishing to establish their own, as though the law could be fulfilled by their free will not divinely assisted, are not subject to the righteousness of God: therefore the righteousness of the law is fulfilled in those who walk not according to the flesh—that is, according to a man ignorant of God's righteousness—but who walk according to the spirit. 'In which it was weakened through the flesh.' It was weakened through concupiscences, that is, through carnal desires: therefore the law was not fulfilled, because there was not yet the charity of that very righteousness, which by an inward delight would hold the mind fast, lest it be dragged toward sin by delight in temporal things.
Therefore the law was weakened through the flesh: that is, it did not make righteous those who were given over to the flesh. 'God sending His Son in the likeness.' He took on flesh like that of other men, but without sin: because He was born neither of concupiscence nor of intercourse, but of a virgin. He does this against Photinus, who denies that the Son existed before the virgin's childbearing. 'Of sinful flesh.' It was not flesh of sin, because it was not born of carnal delight: yet there was in it the likeness of sinful flesh, because it was mortal flesh. 'And by sin He condemned sin.' And from the flesh, which in us formerly served sin, He conquered sin by not sinning: as if someone from among the barbarians should conquer barbarians.
The sacrifices which under the law they offered for sin were called by the name of sin, though they themselves knew no sin: so also the flesh of sin, which was offered for our sins, received the name of sin. Some say that from the sin of the Jews, who killed the Lord, He condemned the sin of the devil by which he had entangled man: as it is written to the Hebrews, that through death He might destroy him who had the power of death. And rightly is death called sin, since it is agreed that it was begotten of sin. Some say that from the sin of the Jews, who had crucified Him, it came to pass that He shed His blood for the remission of sins. 'In the flesh.'
In that very flesh He conquered sin, in order that He might reform by His grace the nature which had been good by its creation and was corrupted by transgression, so that by His help it might be able to conquer sin: which nature had first been so made that it could refrain from sinning if it willed. But this was before the transgression, as I said: for now, through the grace of God, it is able either to avoid sin or to conquer it; yet in such a way that it always implores the Latin—rather, God—as its helper. 'That the justification of the law might be fulfilled in us.' Here he calls either grace itself 'law,' or certainly that justification of the law which was made manifest by the spirit hidden within the letter:
so that, since among those in whom the flesh was alive and resisting the justification of the law could not be fulfilled, it might be fulfilled in us who, by Christ's help, mortify the flesh with its vices. The precepts of the law are fulfilled through charity, which could not be fulfilled through fear. 'Who walk not according to the flesh': who conduct ourselves. 'But according to the spirit.' The flesh is made of earth, but the spirit is given by God. Each of these therefore desires the things whence it comes: the flesh, earthly things; the spirit, heavenly things. If therefore the spirit overcomes the flesh, heavenly things are wrought; but if it consents, earthly things will prevail. But who walks according to the spirit, except him who is led by the Spirit of God? 'For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God.' 'For those who.'
One man consists of spirit and flesh: when therefore he walks according to the flesh, he is flesh; when according to the spirit, he is spirit. 'They are according to the flesh.' The works of the flesh are manifest. 'They mind the things of the flesh.' They covet earthly and carnal goods as the highest goods. 'But those who are according to the spirit mind the things of the spirit,' that is, divine things. For God is spirit: whoever does not resist the will of God minds the things of the spirit. 'For the prudence of the flesh is death.' Prudence is named from foreseeing. Elsewhere he himself says that it is human prudence to return injury for injury. Such prudence therefore prepares death by transgressing the precept. Therefore it is the prudence of the flesh that each one should wish to avenge himself.
But the prudence of the spirit is not to render evil for evil: when the soul desires lower things, it is said to have the prudence of the flesh; when higher things, the prudence of the spirit. Not because the prudence of the flesh is a substance with which the soul is clothed or unclothed; but it is an affection of the soul itself, which will altogether cease to exist when it has turned itself wholly to higher things. 'But the prudence of the spirit is life and peace.' The prudence of the spirit both has peace in the present, by not rendering evil for evil, and for eternity merits eternal life, on account of obedience and peace, while by its patience it does not allow sin to increase. 'Because the wisdom of the flesh.' Not the flesh, but the carnal act. 'Is enmity against God.' For everything that is not subject to God is an enemy:
and whoever wishes to avenge himself exceeds even the measure of the old law: not because he can do any harm to God, but he harms himself. 'For it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can it be.' He said 'impossible' precisely so that in this way he might call them back from the enticements and luxury of the flesh: as if we should say, injustice cannot be just; as though it were said: Snow does not warm, nor indeed can it: for as long as it is snow, it does not warm; but it can be melted, it can even boil so as to warm, but when it does this, it is no longer snow. So too it is called the prudence of the flesh when it covets worldly things instead of heavenly ones: but when it begins to desire heavenly things, it ceases to be the prudence of the flesh. 'But those who are in the flesh.'
From this it is proved that he did not speak of the substance of the flesh. 'Cannot please God.' Because it cannot come to pass that those who live carnally and acquiesce in the desires of the flesh should not sin. 'But you are not in the flesh,' that is, in carnal desires, but in spiritual ones. 'But in the spirit.' In spiritual action they live spiritually who have the Spirit of God: in those the Spirit of God dwells in whom His fruit has appeared, as he says to the Galatians, 'the fruit of the Spirit.' 'If indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not His.' He who loves his enemies will understand that the Holy Spirit proceeds both from the substance of the Father and also from that of the Son:
because he who has His Spirit is of one and the same substance. And therefore, just as He is called the Spirit of the Father, so also of the Son. And therefore He said in the Gospel, 'He will receive of Mine.' 'If anyone,' he says, 'does not have the Spirit of God': that is, so as to pray for his persecutors, to love his enemies, to imitate Him in all things, as the apostle Peter says: 'Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example,' etc. For He Himself says to the disciples: 'You do not know of what spirit you are'—these were of His spirit, because they lived in faith, and hope, and charity. 'But if Christ.' If we always imitate Christ. The body, as though dead, even if it resists, does not conquer, as David says: 'But I, as a deaf man, did not hear; and Thou wilt hear me, O Lord my God.'
'Is in you,' by His grace. 'The body indeed.' The spirit lives and gives life, that we may do righteousness; but the flesh is dead, so that they may not be overcome by it. Not only is this sought, that the flesh should die, but also that the spirit should be quickened. At the same time note that the life of the soul is righteousness: it is fitting therefore that we not only cease from carnal things, but also do spiritual things. 'Is dead because of sin.' He calls the body dead as long as it is such that the neediness of bodily things troubles the soul, and by certain motions solicits and disturbs it. For sin is therefore called concupiscence, because it came about by the desert of sin: just as we speak of anyone's 'hand' in Scripture, because the hand made it. 'But the spirit lives because of justification.'
Here is described that man who lives under grace, and does not yet have perfect peace, which is to come by the resurrection and transformation of the body. For as long as we are in this life, there is no lack of either titillation or delight: for although he who lives under grace and with his mind serves the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin, does not yield. 'But if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you'—of Him who raised Jesus Christ from the dead. If you so present yourselves as to be worthy for the Holy Spirit to dwell in, God will not allow the temple of His Spirit to perish: but just as He raised Jesus from the dead, so He has also quickened us. 'He will quicken your mortal bodies, because of His Spirit dwelling in you.'
When your mortal bodies are therefore quickened, not only will there be no consent to sinning, but not even the very concupiscence of the flesh to which one might consent. 'Therefore, brethren, we are debtors.' All this he does to show that the old law is not necessary for the faithful, since it was given for the carnal and for sinners. 'Not to the flesh, that we should live according to the flesh': that is, we are no longer subject to carnal habit. 'For if you live according to the flesh, you shall die.' If according to the reason set forth above, namely that carnal men cannot keep righteousness. 'But if by the Spirit you mortify the deeds of the flesh, you shall live.' He explains what he meant above by 'flesh,' namely, if by spiritual acts you subject the works of the flesh.
'For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are the sons of God.' As many as are governed by the grace of God and the Holy Spirit. You do well then, if you are moved by Him; on the contrary, the sons of the devil are moved by his spirit, who sins from the beginning. 'For you have not received the spirit of bondage again in fear.' The Jews received a spirit in fear, which compelled them to bondage: because he who fears is a slave; but he who loves is a son: as it is written: 'A slave fears his master, and a son loves his father. If I am a father, where is my honor? If a master, where is my fear?' Therefore, as those who were unwilling to work righteousness out of love are compelled by fear and necessity, we on the contrary ought to do all things voluntarily, out of love, as sons.
'But you have received the spirit of the adoption of the sons of God.' We are then adopted when we are reborn through baptism: for before we were children of wrath; and if children of wrath, where is the fidelity of nature? 'In which we cry, Abba, Father.' He who calls upon a father shows himself to be a son. In all things therefore he ought to imitate the father, lest for a name unworthily usurped he be subject to a greater punishment. 'Crying,' that is, making us cry. 'The Spirit Himself bears witness to our spirit that we are sons.' It is a testimony of adoption that we have the Spirit, through whom we thus pray. So great a gift no one could receive except through the grace of the Son, which is the pledge, that is, the gift of the Holy Spirit. 'But if sons, then heirs indeed of God, but joint-heirs of Christ.'
He who by grace is made a son will merit to be an heir, and to become truly a joint-heir with the Son. 'If indeed we suffer with Him, that we may also be glorified together.' If we suffer with Him, this is patience, and also perseverance: because if we set before our eyes the gifts of God, which He endured for us who were impious, with such a helper we ought not to fear to suffer for Him, that we may be glorified together, as Saint John says: 'Now we are the sons of God; when He shall appear, we shall be like Him.' 'For I reckon that the sufferings of this time are not worthy to be compared with the future glory that shall be revealed in us.' What can a man suffer worthy of heavenly glory, even if that life were such as this present one now is? Whatever he suffers from death is no more than what even for his sins
was previously deserving. But now sins are both forgiven, and then eternal life will be given, and the splendor of the sun, etc. He shows the reward, so that death may more easily be despised, so that one may more safely come to Him. For we know men—what is worse—of their own accord to have crept up to the beasts for the sake of gold. This we ought to do, with God as helper, in tribulations for the Lord's sake: which, though they be temporal, bestow eternal salvation. If he says this, what of us? 'For the expectation of the creature awaits the revelation of the sons of God.' 'For the creature was made subject to vanity.' Some wish to understand the creature as Adam and Eve, whom the serpent, by the hope of divinity, subjected to vanity, and made to be subject to corruption though unwilling:
that is, not of themselves, because sinning they were condemned by a just judgment; because they themselves (they say) will be freed from the bondage of corruption. But by 'every creature' they say all men are meant, because up to the coming of Christ they were righteous, since they too have not yet received, but await in hope. 'And not only they, but we ourselves also,' in whom these things are fulfilled, still hope, we to whom it was said: 'Many prophets and righteous men desired to see the things which you see, and did not see them.' Therefore he says: 'They await the revelation of the sons of God'; all things will be thus for as long as there is resurrection; afterwards they will cease from activity, and be changed, according to the Scriptures. 'For it was made subject to vanity,' that is, to men who have vanished, whom other men serve.
Whatever has an end is vain in comparison with eternal life. 'Vanity (he says) of vanities, all is vanity.' Do not think that it has bestowed anything upon you, since it has given even perishable and worldly things. 'Not willing, but by reason of Him who subjected it, in hope.' Not of its own accord. Others say the angels, because they too are creatures, await that men be changed into the dignity of angels. 'Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption, into the liberty of the glory of the sons of God.' Those who wish to understand this of the creation of the world say this: When the sons of God are to be glorified, then the creation itself also will become free from bondage: because it too feels toil, just as land continually sown becomes barren.
'For we know that every creature groans and is in travail until now.' Those things which can groan, groan on account of excessive toil: because more is demanded of them than they can bear. But those things which have no sense, how do they groan? Unless perhaps they groan on account of our iniquities, just as at the Passion of the Lord the sun fled, because it could not bear to look upon the impiety of the Jews. 'And not only it, but we ourselves also, having the first-fruits of the spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, awaiting the adoption.' Not only the creature, which has no receptacle of the spirit, or carnal men; but even we who have known the joy of the time to come, grieve that we labor here longer. Likewise, in another way:
Not only the angels, who are more kindly disposed toward us, grieve over those who persevere in offenses; but we also who have the Holy Spirit groan over such people. 'The redemption of our body.' The resurrection of Christ is the redemption of our body. Or: we await the glorification in the future resurrection of our body: that this corruptible may put on incorruption. This little chapter is obscure, says Augustine, because it does not sufficiently appear what he now calls 'creature.' Now according to catholic teaching 'creature' is said of whatever God the Father has made and established, through His only-begotten Son, in the unity of the Holy Spirit. Therefore not only our bodies, but also our souls—that is, under the name of spirit—are contained under 'creature.'
But it is said thus: 'The creature itself shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the liberty of the glory of the sons of God': as though we were not creatures, but sons of God, into the liberty of whose glory the creature that was made shall be delivered from bondage. Likewise he says: 'For we know that every creature groans and grieves until now. Not only it, but we ourselves also,' as though we were one thing, and every creature another. The whole chapter therefore must be considered piece by piece. 'For I reckon (he says) that the sufferings of this time are not worthy to be compared with the future glory that shall be revealed in us.' This is clear: for he had said above: 'But if by the Spirit you mortify the deeds of the flesh, you shall live.'
Which cannot happen without hardship, for which patience is necessary. To this pertains also what he said a little before: 'If indeed we suffer with Him, that we may also be glorified together.' Therefore what he says: 'For the expectation of the creature awaits the revelation of the sons of God,' I think he means this: For this very thing which grieves in us, when we mortify the deeds of the flesh—that is, when we hunger, or thirst through abstinence; while we bridle the delight of intercourse through chastity; when we endure the lacerations of injuries and the stings of insults through patience; while, neglecting and casting off our pleasures, we labor for the fruit of Mother Church:
whatever in us grieves in this and suchlike wearing-down is 'creature,' for both body and soul grieve, which are certainly creature, and it awaits the revelation of the sons of God—that is, it awaits when there shall appear what has been called. For since the only-begotten Son of God cannot be called a creature, seeing that through Him were made all things which God made, we are distinctly called 'creature' before that manifest glory; and we are distinctly called 'sons of God,' although we merit this by adoption. For that Only-begotten is Son by nature.
Therefore 'the expectation of the creature,' that is, our expectation, 'awaits the revelation of the sons of God'—that is, it awaits when there shall appear what has been promised, when in reality shall be made manifest what we now are in hope; for we are the sons of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be. 'For we know that when He shall appear, we shall be like Him: because we shall see Him as He is.' This is the revelation of the sons of God, which now the expectation of the creature awaits. For that the creature awaits the revelation of another nature—since it is not a creature, but that very one which now is such as it is—awaits when it shall be such as it is to be. As if it were said:
With the work set before the painter, the colors laid ready to hand and prepared for his work, the expectation of the colors awaits the revelation and manifestation of the image: not because they will then be others, or will not be colors, but only that they will then have a different dignity. 'For the creature was made subject to vanity': this is that saying: 'Vanity of vanities, and all is vanity. What abundance has a man in all his labor with which he labors under the sun?'—to whom it was said: 'In labor shalt thou eat bread?' 'For the creature was made subject to vanity not of its own accord.' Well is it added: 'Not of its own accord'; for man indeed sinned of his own accord, but was not condemned of his own accord. Sin therefore was voluntary, to act against the precept of truth; but the punishment of sin is to be made subject to falsehood.
Therefore not of its own accord was the creature made subject to vanity, but by reason of Him who subjected it in hope—that is, by reason of righteousness and clemency: who neither left sin unpunished, nor willed the sinner to be incurable. 'Because the creature itself also,' that is, man himself, when, having lost the seal of the image on account of sin, he remained only a creature—that creature, then, that is, that which is not yet called the perfect form of the sons, but is only called 'creature,' shall be delivered from the bondage of destruction. Therefore what he says, 'and it also shall be delivered,' gives us to understand: it also, just as we—that is, we must not despair even of those who are not yet called sons of God, because they have not yet believed, but are only creature:
because they too are creature, and shall be delivered from the bondage of destruction, just as we also who are already sons of God, although it has not yet appeared what we shall be. It shall therefore be delivered from the bondage of destruction into the liberty of the glory of the sons of God: that is, they themselves shall be free from being slaves, and glorious from being dead, in that perfect life which the sons of God shall have. 'For we know that every creature groans and grieves until now.' Every creature is numbered in man: not because all the angels, and the supereminent virtues and powers, heaven, earth and sea, and all things in them, are in him; but because every creature is partly spiritual, partly animal, partly corporeal: as He says in the Gospel: 'Preach the Gospel to every creature.'
And to the Colossians: 'In the hope of the Gospel, which was preached in every creature that is under heaven.' That we may consider this from the lower things: corporeal creation is shown by place; but the animal quickens corporeal things; the animal governs, and then governs well when it subjects itself to God to be governed. But when it transgresses His precepts, it is entangled in labors and hardships by those very things which it could have governed. He therefore who lives by the body is called a carnal or an animal man: carnal, because he pursues carnal things; but animal, because he is carried away by the dissolute wantonness of his soul, which the spirit does not govern, nor restrain within the bounds of the natural order, because it too does not submit itself to God to be governed.
But he who by the spirit governs the soul, and through the soul the body—which he cannot do unless he himself also has the Lord as his director: since, just as the man cannot be the head of the woman, so Christ is the head of the man—is called spiritual, because even so his life is now passed with some hardship; but afterwards he will suffer none. And since the highest angels live spiritually, but the lowest animally, but the beasts and all cattle carnally, while the body does not live but is quickened, every creature is in man, because he both understands by spirit, and perceives by soul, and moves locally by body. Every creature therefore groans and grieves in man:
for he did not say 'the whole,' but 'every,' as if someone should say that all men who are unharmed see the sun, but do not see with their whole selves, because they see only with their eyes. So in man is every creature, who both understands, and lives, and has a body; but not the whole creature is in him, because there are besides him both angels, who understand, and live, and are; and cattle, which live and are; and bodies, which merely are: since to live itself is more than not to live, and to understand itself is more than to live without understanding. When therefore wretched man groans and grieves, every creature groans together and grieves.
But he rightly said 'until now,' because even if there are already some in Abraham's bosom, and that thief established in paradise had ceased to grieve on the day he believed; nevertheless until now every creature groans together and grieves, because in those who are not yet delivered there is the 'every' through spirit and body and soul. 'And not only,' he says, 'does every creature groan together and grieve, but we ourselves also.' That is: not only in man do body, and soul, and spirit grieve together from the difficulties of the body; but we ourselves also, apart from our bodies, groan together within our very selves. And well did he say: 'Having the first-fruits of the spirit,' that is, those whose spirit has already been offered to God as a sacrifice, and has been laid hold of in the divine fire of charity.
These are the first-fruits of man, because truth first takes possession of our spirit, so that through this the rest may be laid hold of; or because we first received the spirit at the very coming of redemption. Therefore he already has the first-fruits offered to God who says: 'With the mind I serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin.' And he who says: 'God, to whom is my speaking in my spirit.' And of whom it is said: 'The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.' But since he still says: 'Wretched man that I am, who shall deliver me from the body of this death?' and still elsewhere it is said: 'He will quicken even your mortal bodies, and because of His Spirit remaining in you': it is not yet a holocaust; but it will be, when death shall be swallowed up in victory, when it shall be said to it: 'Where is thy strife, O death?'
'Where, O death, is thy sting?' Now therefore, he says, not only does every creature—that is, together with the body—but we ourselves, having the first-fruits of the Spirit—that is, we souls, because we have offered our minds as first-fruits to God—groan within ourselves: that is, apart from the body, awaiting the adoption, the redemption of our body: that is, so that the body itself also, receiving the benefit of the adoption of sons by which we have been called, may show us wholly delivered, all our troubles being passed, to be sons of God on every side. 'For by hope we were saved. But hope that is seen is not hope.' Then therefore will that be a reality, which now is hope, when it shall appear that we are like Him, since we shall see Him as He is.
If this chapter is opened up in this manner, as it has been treated, we shall not fall into those difficulties by which very many men are compelled to say that all the angels and sublime virtues are in grief and groaning before we are wholly delivered: because it is said, 'Every creature groans together and grieves.' For although they help us according to their sublimity, while they obey God, who deigned to send His only Son for us; nevertheless they are to be believed to do this without groaning and grief, lest they be thought wretched, and Lazarus—of our number—who already rests in Abraham's bosom, be more blessed: especially since he said that the same creature, which groans and grieves, was made subject to vanity:
which it is impious to believe of the highest and most excellent creatures among the virtues and powers. Then he said it was delivered from the bondage of destruction, into which we cannot believe those to have fallen who lead a most blessed life in the heavens. Yet nothing must be rashly affirmed, and the divine words must be handled again and again with pious diligence: lest perhaps, when 'it groans and grieves, and is made subject to vanity,' it might be able to be understood in some other way, so that concerning the highest angels—as long as, by the Lord's command, they do not succor our weakness—it might not be possible to reckon it. But whether that exposition which we have carried out, or another of this chapter be brought forward, this only must be guarded against, that it neither violate nor wound the catholic faith:
For I know that many empty heretics have boasted much that is impious and foolish. 'For by hope we are saved.' By hope, he says, salvation is hoped for, not yet in the reality itself; just as it is said to the Corinthians: 'We walk by faith, not by sight.' We believe that we shall be what we are not yet. 'But hope that is seen is not hope. For what a man sees, why does he hope for?' What is seen is not hoped for, because it is already held. 'But if we hope for that which we see not,' therefore patience through faith has a great reward, because it hopes for what it does not see; and thus we are secure, as though we had already received what we have not yet received. 'By patience we wait for it.' Hope cannot exist without patience. 'And in like manner the Spirit also helpeth.'
According to this same waiting, the Spirit helps the weakness of our prayer, so that we may pray for the things which are God's, and, on account of hope, may ask for the things which are pleasing to God. 'Our weakness.' Our prayer is weak, unless it be not only helped by the Holy Spirit but even inspired by Him. For what should we pray? Often the things we think prosperous are harmful; therefore they are not granted, since God provides better, just as Paul three times besought the Lord. 'We know not what we should pray for as we ought.' Because now we see through a glass, as he says to the Corinthians: 'If any man think that he knoweth anything, he hath not yet known as he ought to know.' 'But the Spirit himself asketh for us.' How does He tempt us, that He may know—that is, that He may make us to know—as it is said:
'He built the house at whose command it is made,' so also the Holy Spirit intercedes, that is, He pours forth in us the asking for the things which are God's, by inspiring, or bestowing, or working in us. 'With unspeakable groanings.' He makes us groan with other, mute groanings: because as much as we cannot ask with the mouth, so much we implore with groanings. 'But he who searcheth the hearts knoweth what the Spirit desireth.' Here he has named the grace of the Spirit the Holy Spirit, just as there: 'If I pray in a tongue, my spirit prayeth,' where the kind of tongue or of speech is understood. 'Because it is according to God.' Because He desires heavenly and divine things. 'He asketh for the saints.' For holy things, not human, nor earthly. 'And we know that to them that love God all things work together unto good.'
Whatever we shall have done, or shall have suffered for love's sake, all things run together for us unto reward: whether they 'work together,' that is, increase; or by God's help are turned against adversity into prosperity, according to that word: 'Whatsoever thou shalt do shall prosper.' 'To them that according to' His purpose. Just as He also calls us elect before the foundation of the world. 'According to His purpose they are called saints.' It is God's purpose that, without the works of the law, or any other merits, He should justify the ungodly by faith alone—which faith is not from nature, but is the gift of God: among the rest, the fruit of the Spirit is also faith. For not all who are called are called according to His purpose; since 'many are called, but few are chosen.'
These, therefore, are called according to His purpose, who are also chosen before the foundation of the world. 'For whom He foreknew He also predestinated to be made conformable to the image of His Son.' He predestinated, so that he who by His gift was conformed to Him in life should be conformed also in glory: He 'who transformed the body of our lowliness, conformable to the body of His glory.' Whence also John: 'We shall be like Him.' 'That He might be the firstborn among many brethren.' The firstborn from the dead, because He has many before Himself. 'And whom He predestinated.' Here predestination is understood as belonging to times, not to the men of this particular time: that is, both before the law, under the law, and under grace. But whosoever were then saved, were saved by the grace of God, as the Apostle says:
'Having the same spirit of faith.' 'These He also called.' He called men in this time unto faith, because with Him, before the world existed, they had already been called. They are called through the inspiration of faith, and through exhortation, and by divine working; they are justified through baptism, glorified through the reward, whether in the present through virtue; but all these are gifts of God: for he says elsewhere, 'That He would count you worthy of your calling'; and that other saying, 'Who called you in the grace of God,' being 'justified freely,' who 'worketh all in all': because He Himself rescued us from the power of darkness and translated us into the kingdom of His love—not His own, but that of the Son. 'And whom He called, them He also justified; and whom He justified, them He also magnified.'
'It is a great thing for thee to be called my servant': those whom, after the resurrection, He will glorify. All those things have already been done—He foreknew, predestinated, called, and justified. Since all have already been foreknown and predestinated, and many have already been called and justified. But as to what he says, 'Them He also glorified,' that glory is here to be understood of which the same one speaks: 'When Christ, your life, shall appear, then shall you also appear with Him in glory.' 'What then shall we say to these things? If God be for us, who is against us?' If God helps us, who shall harm us? If God wishes to justify us freely, who says: It cannot be done?
He wishes to show that what we have received is a great thing, and that no one prevails to hinder the will of God, who does what He wills. 'He who spared not even His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all: how hath He not also, with Him, given us all things?' He spared Him not, by permitting Him to be delivered up, so that freedom of choice unto sinning might remain even to those who delivered Him, and that He might show us an example of patience. For what has Christ dearer that He would deny us, who for us spared not His own Son? Moreover, He was delivered up not only by the Father, but by Himself, as he says elsewhere: 'Who delivered Himself an offering and a sacrifice to God for an odour of sweetness.' 'Who shall accuse the elect of God?' Who shall accuse those whom God has chosen, and has made to believe in Him?
God proves by signs and mighty works that they are already just, against those who say: There are none just except those whom the law has justified—when at that time all things were shut up under sin. If you were to pronounce it as though affirming, how great a perversity would arise? Thus therefore it must be pronounced, as if it were said: 'Is it God who justifieth anything?'—so that it may be understood: Surely it is not God who justifies? Understanding: Is it not God who through them does signs and wonders, who has justified them freely? 'Who is he that condemneth?' As if he asks: Who is he that condemns? or that dismisses? It must be understood: Surely not Christ? And he answers: Does He who died for us Himself condemn us? God forbid. Nay rather, He who also rose again, and is in the blessedness of the Father.
He who, as in the form of a servant, entreats the Father for us, and also, together with the Father, hears us—will He Himself accuse or condemn us? 'Christ Jesus who died'—nay, rather who rose again. He loved us so greatly that He even died for us. 'Who is at the right hand of God.' Where He is, thither we too shall come; he treats of Him according to the manhood, according to which He died, and was made 'the firstborn from the dead.' 'Who also maketh intercession for us.' The Arians are wont to say: He who intercedes is the lesser. It must be answered that the Lord suffers no forgetfulness, so that He is ever mindful on behalf of those whom He Himself has justified.
But He is said to intercede in this, that He ever shows and offers to the Father the man, whom He has taken up and glorified, as it were our pledge, as the true and eternal Priest. Through which manhood He is also called the lesser: just as soul and body, of diverse substance, are one man, so God and man, of diverse substance, are one Christ. And by this, since He Himself is one of diverse substance, He in a certain manner petitions Himself, He in a certain manner hears for us. 'Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or famine, or persecution, or nakedness, or peril, or the sword?' as it is written. The Jews wished to separate them from Christ, wishing to recall them to the keeping of the law.
After benefits and promises so great and so illustrious, who will give or promise us any such thing, that we should with reason depart from Christ, who even laid down His own soul for us? 'For thy sake we are put to death all the day long; we are counted as sheep for the slaughter.' 'Blessed are ye when they persecute you for my sake.' And, for thy sake, he says, not for any crime, are we afflicted with death; and for thy sake we endure death, when we could render like for like. In us most of all is this testimony fulfilled, to whom it is not even permitted to resist, following the example of our Master and Lord, who was 'led as a sheep to the slaughter.' But 'in all these things we overcome, because of Him that loved us.'
We reduce all these tribulations to nothing on account of Him who so greatly loved us, that He died for us: and when we die for His name, then most of all do we triumph. 'For I am sure that neither death, nor life.' I am sure: because neither if anyone threaten me with death, nor if he promise me eternal life. 'Nor angels.' Not even if he say himself an angel sent from God: as he himself says to the Galatians. 'Nor principalities, nor things present.' Not even if he confer honour in the present. 'Nor things to come.' Nor if he promise present goods, and in the future glory. 'Nor might.' Not even if he work mighty deeds. 'Nor height.' Of the kingdom of heaven or of wisdom. 'Nor depth.' Nor the depth of knowledge, or hell.
'Nor any other creature shall be able to separate us.' He named almost every creature, and was not content with these, and added: Even if there be any other creature, it shall not be able to separate us from the love of Christ. Whence it must be considered with what faith one has believed in Christ. 'From the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.' The love of Christ does not consist in this alone, if one says that he loves Him, but also in that whatever is done to His saints, He Himself testifies is done to Himself, saying: 'He that receiveth you, receiveth me,' etc. And John says: 'If thou lovest not thy brother whom thou seest, how canst thou love the Lord whom thou seest not?' Nay, He willed that the love of God be shown in the brethren. 'For God,' he says, 'is love,' and the rest. And the Lord:
'In this,' He says, 'shall it be known that you are my disciples, if you love one another.' 'If you love me, keep my commandments.' And: 'He who heareth my words and doeth them, he it is that loveth me.' CHAPTER IX. 'I speak the truth.' Some say that, being about to say an incredible thing—namely, that he would wish to be anathema from Christ for Israel's sake—he first satisfies them with a certain attestation. He satisfies the Jews that he does not hate them, but is exceedingly grieved on their account, because they refuse to believe in Christ, who had been promised to them. 'In Christ I lie not.' Whoever therefore has been baptized, whether he speaks truth or falsehood, whatever he does, he does it in Christ, of whom he is a member. And whoever sins in baptism, sins in Christ, as he says:
'Thus sinning against the brethren, and wounding their weak consciences, you sin against Christ.' 'My conscience bearing me witness.' He speaks truly whose conscience bears witness, and does not convict him of a lie. 'In the Holy Spirit.' Not feignedly. 'That I have great sadness, and continual sorrow in my heart.' Because I have seen them not believing in God. 'For I myself wished to be anathema from Christ for my brethren, who are my kinsmen according to the flesh.' I wished it once, not now would I wish it. For I knew that all things were theirs; but when I came to know the truth, I was converted—I who was so faithless—and they are not converted.
'Who are Israelites, to whom belongeth the adoption of sons, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service, and the promises.' He recounts also what he has renounced, that you may know how great a power that was which could separate him from them. 'Whose are the fathers': Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. 'And of whom is Christ according to the flesh, who is over all things, God.' Against the Arian, the Manichaean, and the Photinian, but also against Nestorius, who denies the Lord Christ according to the flesh. 'Blessed for ever. Amen.' And Thomas said, 'My God and my Lord,' which He confirms, saying: 'Because thou hast seen, therefore thou hast believed.' 'But not as though the word of God had failed.'
Because he had said above that he grieved that the race of Israel was excluded from the kingdom by its own fault—the race to whom all these things had belonged—here he shows that those who do not believe are not the sons of Abraham, lest he be thought to preach to all the Jews, and lest it be said: Then has God lied to Abraham? God forbid. Hence he begins to reason why, by the high and just judgment of God, the Jews being rejected, the Gentiles were let in. 'For all are not Israelites that are of Israel; neither are they all children who are the seed of Abraham.' If not all, yet some, who were chosen from thence, and made believers; if not all who are of Israel are Israel, then, on the contrary, many who are not of Israel are Israel. The Saviour says: 'Behold a true Israelite, in whom there is no guile.'
In whom therefore there is guile, he is not a true Israelite. 'But in Isaac shall thy seed be called.' In Isaac then were also called the sons of Abraham, not in Ishmael, though he too was his seed. 'That is, they that are the children of the flesh are not the children of God; but they that are the children of the promise are counted for the seed'—for this is the word of promise. For Ishmael indeed was born according to the ordinary way, from a bondwoman; but Isaac had more than nature gave, since he was born of aged parents by promise. So also now the promise makes Christians the sons of Abraham—not the flesh—and the imitation of his faith, by which he was justified, and merited that in his seed all the tribes of the earth should be blessed—not circumcision.
'At this time I will come, and Sarah shall have a son.' Not Hagar the bondwoman's—so as to show that the later people is of the promise, thus also in Isaac. 'And not only she, but Rebecca also.' Not only Ishmael and Isaac, who, though from the one Abraham, yet were born of different mothers, and were not one before the Lord; but also Jacob and Esau, who from one conjugal act were born of Rebecca, before they were born, by God's foreknowledge were separated from one another before God—so that the purpose of God might remain in His foreknowledge, by which He was about to reject the unbelieving Jews, and to grant mercy to the Gentiles without any merits.
He does all this to show that with God the prerogative of race avails nothing, nor does He accept any man's person; which he wishes to confirm by these examples, which they could have turned into a calumny—about to show from these very things that God does what He wills, and no one can contradict Him, if He willed to give something specially to their race, and now to choose whomsoever He willed. 'Isaac our father, of one conjugal act.' 'For when they were not yet born, nor had done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand.' Of one, two—she who is understood first to have brought forth twins—in that, as though something new had happened to her, being terrified, she inquires of the Lord. 'Not of works, but of Him that calleth, it was said to her: The elder shall serve the younger.'
It was fulfilled not in Jacob and Esau, but was said figuratively of the Christian people, which was preferred to the older people of the Jews, just as Ephraim and Manasseh also prefigured the younger people, that is, the Christian, who were blessed with hands crossed. As it is written: 'Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.' This was said in Genesis. This the Prophet relates as fulfilled not of themselves, but of their sons; which testimony the Apostle takes up, and represses curiosity and calumny, asserting that there is no iniquity with God, but whatever He does, He does either mercifully or judicially. 'What shall we say then? Is there injustice with God? God forbid.'
He reasons still further, and sets before himself, as it were, the person of one contradicting, and overcomes him by testimonies—that no one can go against the will of the Lord, Moses himself saying: 'I will have mercy on whom I have mercy'; that is: If I am good, why is thy eye evil? Do I take away from thee what I give to another? In My foreknowledge I have decreed to graft the wild olive into the olive tree; what is that to thee? For He says to Moses: 'I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will show mercy to whom I will be merciful.' For on whom God has mercy, He calls him and inspires him to believe; and to whom He is merciful that he may believe, He grants mercy—that is, He makes him merciful, that he may also do good works. Whence it evidently stands that all good things are from God Himself, who is 'the Saviour of all, especially of the faithful.'
But someone says: Why this one thus, and another not thus, and why not all equally? Is God then a respecter of persons? Respect of persons is rightly said to exist where he who judges, abandoning the merit of the cause about which he judges, favours one against another, because he finds something in the person which is worthy of honour or of mercy. But if anyone have two debtors, and wish to remit the debt to the one and to exact it from the other, he gives to whom he wills, but defrauds no one, nor is it to be called respect of persons, when there is no iniquity.
Otherwise, to those who understand little, respect of persons might seem to exist, where the lord of the vineyard gave to the workmen who had done one hour's work of his as much as to those who had borne the burden of the day and the heat, making them equal in wages, whose distance in labour had been so great. But what did he answer to those who murmured at this as though it were respect of persons? 'Friend, I do thee no wrong,' etc. Surely here is complete justice: this I wish to render, to this one I gave freely, nor did I take anything from thee, or diminish, or deny what I owed. 'Is it not lawful for me to do what I will?' etc. As therefore here there is no respect of persons, because one is thus freely honoured, so that another is not defrauded of his due:
so, when according to the purpose of God one is called and another is not called, to the one who is called a gratuitous good is given—of which good the calling itself is the beginning; to the one who is not called, the due evil is rendered, since all are guilty through the one through whom sin entered into the world. 'Therefore it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.' He concludes the disputation, and brings forward testimonies about Pharaoh, that we may tremble at God's judgments rather than discuss them, because for the most part they are hidden, yet never are they unjust; for it is true that He Himself directs the course of those who run, and that without His grace no one's running obtains its own effect, as Ecclesiastes says: 'The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong'; and David:
'Unless the Lord build the house, they labour in vain that build it.' His help therefore must be implored, who 'worketh all in all.' The Christian ought therefore to run, and never to presume upon his own strength; he ought to run and to fulfil God's precepts, but ought to arrogate nothing to himself, according to that word: 'He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.' This is against those who presumed upon their own merits and strength. For he himself was running, when he wished to go into Bithynia, as we read in the Acts of the Apostles. I believe that his course there was going to be in vain, but he was directed thither by the Holy Spirit, where his preaching would profit. For David also cried out to the Lord: 'Direct my steps according to thy word.'
Without doubt our running is in vain, unless our steps be directed by the Lord. For a horse too can run, but if it have no rider, unbridled and headlong it dashes forward, and does not walk the right path. So too are we without God and His grace. But what man has power to touch his mind with such vision that his will may be moved to faith? And who embraces that in which he takes no delight? Or who has it in his power that either that which can delight him should meet him, or that it should delight him when it has met him? When therefore those things delight us by which we make progress, this is inspired by God, and this grace of God is bestowed—not by our nod, or industry, or the merits of works is it obtained; because in order that there be movement
of the will, that there be industry of zeal, that there be works fervent with charity—He bestows it, He grants it freely. For we are commanded to ask, that we may receive, and to seek, that we may find, to knock, that it may be opened to us. Is not our very prayer sometimes so lukewarm, or rather cold, and almost nothing—nay, sometimes altogether so utterly nothing—that we do not even notice this in ourselves with grief? for if we even grieve at this, we are already praying. What else is shown to us, except that both to ask, and to seek, and to knock, He grants, who commands that we do these things? 'Therefore it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.' Since we can neither will nor run, unless He move and rouse us. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh:
'For this very purpose have I raised thee up, that I may show in thee my power, and that my name may be declared throughout all the earth.' Each one is punished according to the measure and end of his sins being completed. Sometimes even in the present, as the Sodomites and the men of Gomorrah. Pharaoh therefore had already exceeded the measure, and because he was worthy of destruction, God willed by his example to strike fear into all, and that His people, who were about to go out of Egypt, might acknowledge His power and justice, lest they should sin likewise, or fear their adversaries; He willed by such retribution not only to free them from the imminent peril, but also to fortify them beforehand, by the terror of His power, against committing iniquity in time to come.
Concerning Pharaoh it can also be understood thus, that he is said to have been hardened through God's mercy, since when the plague ceased at Moses' prayer, he was hardened; and although He knew him to be so hardened that he could not be converted, yet He showed His goodness. For as to what He said, 'I have raised up,' that is, 'I have brought forth,' not 'I have made': just as if someone should carry two full vessels, one with balsam and the other with dung, he brings forth the fragrance or the stench, he does not generate it. 'Therefore on whom He wills He has mercy, and whom He wills He hardens.' He has mercy of His great goodness, and He hardens by no iniquity: He has mercy by bestowing good, He hardens by rendering what is deserved—as though He said:
'If then you understand it thus, that He has mercy on whom He wills, and hardens whom He wills, your understanding follows, so that you say: Why then does He yet find fault? For what He wills, that we do.' The Apostle perceived what would move their carnal understanding, and set against himself the words of one contradicting, which he might restrain by apostolic authority. For he says: 'You will say therefore to me: Why then does He still complain?' [Below in the same passage it is read 'find fault.'] 'For who resists His will?' And he answered to the one saying these things: 'O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Does the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?' Then, having pursued so great and hidden a secret, he judged how much of it ought to be opened to men, and opened it, saying:
'But if God, willing to show His wrath and to make known His power, endured with much patience the vessels of wrath, which are fitted for destruction, that He might show the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy.' This is not only the aid of God's grace, but even its proof. The aid, namely, in the vessels of mercy; but in the vessels of wrath, the proof. For in them He shows His wrath and makes known His power, because His goodness is so powerful that it uses well even evil things, and in them makes known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy: since what the justice of the One punishing exacts from the vessels of wrath, this the grace of the One delivering remits to the vessels of mercy:
nor would the benefit which is freely bestowed on some appear, unless God, others of the same mass being likewise condemned as guilty by just judgment, showed what was due to both. Hear also the entire interpretation of this passage by the most blessed Father Augustine; for concerning Pharaoh it is thus answered: By his former merits, whereby he afflicted the strangers in his kingdom, he was worthy—fitted for one whose heart should be hardened, so that he would not believe even the most manifest signs of God commanding: from the same mass, therefore, that is, of sinners, He brought forth both the vessels of mercy, whom He would succour when the children of Israel entreated Him, and the vessels of wrath, by whose punishment He would instruct them, that is, Pharaoh and his people:
because although both were sinners, and on that account belonged to one mass, yet they were to be treated differently—those who had groaned to the one God, that He might succour them; differently those under whose unjust burdens they had groaned. He endured therefore 'with much patience the vessels of wrath, which are fitted for destruction.' And by the very fact that he says 'with much patience,' he sufficiently signified that He then avenged their former sins, in which He endured them: since from their vengeance there was to be succour for those who were being delivered: 'that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He hath prepared unto glory.' Here perhaps, disturbed, you have returned to that question: If He has mercy on whom He wills, and hardens whom He wills, why does He yet complain?
'Who resists His will?' Assuredly it is so: whether you will or will not, He has mercy on whom He wills, and hardens whom He wills. But what impious man would call the will of God unjust—to whom Pharaoh himself cries out: 'God is just: but I and my people are unjust,' because this will of God cannot be unjust. For it comes of the most hidden merits, which distinguish the sinners themselves. For although, on account of the general sin, they made up one mass, yet there is not no diversity among them; because there are many sinners naturally living with moderation, whereby, although they are not yet justified, they nevertheless are made worthy of justification:
and it does not precede in other sinners that by their own vice they should be worthy of the hardening—we having the same Apostle saying elsewhere: 'Because they did not approve to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense.' This is what hardened Pharaoh's heart. But that they did not approve to have God in their knowledge—this is what made them worthy to be given up to a reprobate sense: yet it is true that it is 'not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy'; because if for that reason anyone shall have been, by lighter sins, or certainly by graver and many sins, yet with great groaning and grief of repenting, made worthy of God's mercy, it is not of himself—who, if he were forsaken, would perish—but of the merciful God, who succours his prayers and griefs.
For it is a small thing to will, although even our willing is prepared by the Lord; yet (as I have said) it is a small thing to will, unless the Lord have mercy. But God, who calls to peace, does not have mercy, unless a will already indeed healed have gone before: because 'peace to men of good will.' And just as no one can even will, unless admonished and called—whether inwardly, where no man sees, or outwardly through the sounding word, or through certain visible signs—it comes to pass that God works in us even the very willing. For to that supper which the Lord in the Gospel says was prepared, not all who were called wished to come, nor could those who came have come, unless they were called.
Nor ought those who came to attribute it to themselves, because they came called: nor ought those who refused to come to attribute it to another, but only to themselves: since, that they might come, they were called while in free power. To call, therefore, works the will before merit: therefore even if anyone attributes it to himself that he came when called, he cannot attribute to himself that he was called. But he who, called, did not come, as he has no merit of reward that he should be called, so he falls into the merit of punishment, who, called, neglected to come. Thus shall those two things be: 'Mercy and judgment I will sing to thee, O Lord.' To mercy belongs the calling; to judgment belongs the blessedness of those who came when called, and the punishment of those who refused to come.
Was it then hidden from Pharaoh how great a good those lands were going to obtain through the coming of Joseph? The knowledge of that deed done, therefore, becomes his calling, that, treating the people of Israel mercifully, he might not be ungrateful. But because he was unwilling to obey this calling, and exercised cruelty upon those to whom humanity and mercy were due, he merited the penalty, that his heart should be hardened, and that he should suffer so great a blindness of mind that he would not believe so many and so great and so manifest signs of God—whereby the people might be instructed, by his punishment whether of hardening or of final visible submersion, so that by that affliction, both of the hidden dulling and of the manifest submersion, he might procure it for himself by the just desert of his disobedience.
Now this calling, which works its effect whether in individual men, or in whole peoples, and indeed in the very human race, according to the opportune moments of the times, belongs to another and more profound ordering; to which pertains also that word: 'In the womb I sanctified you; and while you were in the loins of your father, I saw you.' And, 'Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated,' though it was said before he was born. Nor can it be grasped, except perhaps by those who love the Lord their God with their whole heart, and with their whole soul, and with their whole mind, and their neighbour as themselves. For being grounded in so great a charity, they are able now, if perchance together with the saints, to comprehend the length, the breadth, and the depth.
Yet this must be held with the most steadfast faith: that God does nothing unjustly, and that there is no nature which does not owe to God that which it is. For to God is owed all comeliness, and beauty, and the fitting proportion of parts; and if you pursue this to the very end, and strip away from things all their remaining traces, nothing at all remains. Since therefore by sinning we have lost merit, and if the mercy of God be withdrawn, nothing else is owed to sinners save eternal punishment, what does a man born of the lump of perdition mean, when he answers back to God and says: 'Why have you made me thus?' If you wish to know these things, be not clay, but become a son of God through the mercy of him who gave power to become the sons of God to those who believe in his name.
But that which you desire is not given to men who desire to know divine things before they believe. For the reward of knowledge is rendered to merits; but by believing merit is acquired. Yet grace itself, which is given through faith, is given with no merits of ours going before. For what merit has a sinner and an ungodly man? But Christ died for sinners and for the ungodly, so that we might be called to believe not by merit but by grace, and by believing might then lay up merit as well. Sinners therefore are commanded to believe, and by believing are cleansed from their sins. For they do not know what they shall see by living rightly:
wherefore, since they cannot see unless they live rightly, nor can they live rightly unless they believe, it is manifest that one must begin from faith, so that the precepts by which believers are turned away from this world may make them clean, that God may there be seen; and then at last you will hear rightly, and not preposterously, whatever things there are concerning the most hidden merits of souls and concerning the secret grace or justice of almighty God. Faith too, that you may believe, he gives, from whom is every good gift; for what have you that you did not receive? You say to me therefore: 'Why is it still sought? for who resists his will?' It is true that he is not resisted; because the very will of God is doubted by no Christian to be good and just. O man, who are you, that you should answer back to God?
And this belongs to one who contradicts: even if it were so as you say, who were you, that you should answer back to God? you who ought to keep silence, and to do what is commanded you; if he commands you to do good, you ought to understand that he himself is also good, to whom evil is not pleasing, and from which he forbids you. Did he say: 'O man, what you said is false'? but he said: 'O man, who are you, that you should answer back to God?' and the rest. Does the thing formed say to him who formed it: 'Why have you made me thus?' Has not the potter power over the clay? He does not say that he cannot, nor ought not; he wills that we be as mute before the Lord, as the clay is toward the potter:
for when we do not understand, we ought not to think evil of God, knowing that no fault can fall upon God, since his judgements are hidden, but are not unjust. Out of the same lump, to make one vessel indeed unto honour, but another unto dishonour? He speaks of that lump of the sinful people, from which as from Adam we were all created. But if God, willing to show his wrath and to make known his power. The will of God is merciful and just, and wills nothing save what is good, pious, and just. He endured with much patience. He who long endured that people blaspheming, and afflicting his own people with hard labours. The vessels of wrath fitted unto destruction, that he might show the riches of his glory.
By filling up their sins, they had been made worthy vessels of wrath, fitted by themselves unto destruction, not only through original sin, but through actual sin. For wrath is not rendered except as a debt, lest there be iniquity with God. And from this the vessels of mercy understand how freely mercy is bestowed upon them, in that to the vessels of wrath, with whom they share the same cause of perdition and the common lump, wrath is repaid as owed and just, while to these an undeserved mercy is granted. Upon the vessels of mercy, which he prepared unto glory, whom also he called. Because he himself willed to have mercy on them, and to make them vessels of mercy out of vessels of wrath. Not only of the Jews. If he had called them individually, he would have called the Jews alone;
but we find that he neither spared the Jews when they sinned, nor forbade the Gentiles to be saved. But also from the Gentiles, as Hosea says. For even then a good number of Egyptians had gone out with them. 'I will call that which was not my people, my people; and her that was not beloved, beloved.' Through the prophet he shows it foretold, that the Gentiles would pass over to Christ. 'And her that had not obtained mercy, one that has obtained mercy.' 'And it shall be in the place where it was said to them, You are not my people: there they shall be called sons of the living God.' To such a degree does he call whom he wills, that he chose even the ungodly Gentiles, who had never wrought any good. For if he chose according to merits, Israel alone, who always served God, ought to have obtained this:
but he saves all freely, and none by their own merits, since, as he says: 'He has shut up all under sin, that he might have mercy upon all.' But Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: 'If the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea.' It is for them, if they believe, that which is threatened against them. 'A remnant shall be saved.' Isaiah shows that a small number of the Jews would believe, who are the vessels unto honour; for the remaining multitude are vessels unto dishonour. 'A word consummating and cutting short in equity.' According to the literal sense it is thus understood: as I shorten and finish the word, so God will do that thing swiftly. But according to the allegory, the New Testament receives the shortened word, because all things are briefly comprehended in it, as it is:
'I believe in God the Father almighty, and in his Son Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Spirit,' and the rest that follows in the Creed. Or that: 'What you do not wish to be done to yourselves, do not do to others.' That is, so that by a compendium of faith, through grace, he may save the believers, not through countless observances by which that multitude was slavishly burdened and oppressed. For through grace he made for us a word consummating and cutting short upon the earth, saying: 'My yoke is easy and my burden is light.' Or that: 'You shall love God and your neighbour; on these precepts hang all the law and the prophets.' 'For the Lord will make a shortened word upon the earth.' 'The Lord has drawn together and cut short the people of Israel.' And as Isaiah foretold:
'Unless the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we should have become as Sodom, and been made like unto Gomorrah.' Because he did not suffer all to perish with the ungodly, but from thence made at least a few righteous, and the seed of Abraham came, which should save those things that were perishing; unless he had willed to save even a few, we should all alike have perished, but that he might fulfil what he had promised to Abraham. But why this one receives and that one does not, since both do not merit to receive, and whoever receives, receives undeservedly, let them measure their own strength, and not search into things too strong for them; let it suffice them to know that there is no iniquity with God. What then shall we say, that the Gentiles, who did not follow after righteousness, laid hold on righteousness?
If it is not as we say, namely that it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, how did the Gentiles, who never sought after righteousness, find righteousness? and Israel, who always followed after righteousness, could not attain to the law of righteousness? He answered: Because those believed, but these would not, but gloried in works which they did not even keep. What then do we say against these things which can be objected to us, that is, that the Gentiles, not following after, laid hold, but Israel did not lay hold? but let us tremble at the judgements of God, which, as I said, are hidden; yet are they never unjust. But righteousness which is of faith; but Israel, following after the law of righteousness, did not attain to the law of righteousness.
Which the Lord gave to the called, that they might believe. Why? Because it was not of faith, but as it were of works. 'As it were,' because not truly. They stumbled. They stumble at the stone of stumbling, as it were by subtly defending the law, and by casting themselves headlong through nature and free will: even as the philosophers of the world. Upon the stone of stumbling. He who sees the stone, the stone is one of salvation to him who does not stumble against it; but he who is blind stumbles against the stone. So too the Jews, whom their own malice blinded, lest they should acknowledge Christ, stumbled against him, doing him injury, whereas in him the believing Gentiles laid hold on righteousness.
Therefore Christ was foretold as a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence, because many are scandalized at his Passion and his Nativity, as it is written: 'Because they were scandalized in him.' And Paul himself to the Corinthians: 'Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling-block, but to the Gentiles foolishness: but to those who are called, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.' Whence here too it follows: 'He who believes in him shall not be confounded.' Peter also says that to the believers the stone is elect and cornerstone, but to the unbelieving a stone of offence. As it is written: 'Behold, I lay in Sion a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence.' This he said in the prophet Isaiah. 'And everyone who believes in him shall not be confounded.' Because he understands the power of God and the wisdom of God. Chapter 10.
Brethren, the desire indeed of my heart, and my supplication to God, is made. For enemies one must pray not only with the lips, but also with the heart. For them unto salvation. For the Jews. 'For I bear them witness that they have a zeal of God.' They have a zeal for following the law of God. 'But not according to knowledge.' Unless a man does all things according to the knowledge given by God, he strikes his foot, even if he be perfect. If the Jews had the knowledge of God, they would recognize that Christ came not against the law, but according to the law, and that they cannot be justified according to the law, but that God justifies freely by faith, not by the works of the law in which they gloried. For being ignorant of God's righteousness.
they were ignorant that he justifies freely by faith, and not by the works of the law in which they gloried, saying that they had kept the law, which they had not kept, and by justifying themselves through it, they do not submit themselves to the remission of sins, lest they should seem to have been sinners. For they were not compelled unwillingly to be unbelievers, but by refusing to believe, they were not free from the guilt of unbelief. And seeking to establish their own, they were not subject to the righteousness of God. Which is of the law, or which they were deceived to think was of free will, as they are deceived; and while they attribute to themselves that which is God's, they are not subject to the righteousness of God. The righteousness of the law, then, is to command what pleases God, and to forbid what displeases him.
In the law is righteousness: to serve, and beyond it to seek no help of God for living rightly. But God's righteousness is: not to presume upon one's own strength. It is called the righteousness of God, not by which God is righteous, but by which God gives to man, that man may be righteous through God. For Christ is the end of the law, unto righteousness. Christ is called the end of the law, because he himself is, or in him is, the whole perfection. And it is called 'end' from being consummated, not from being consumed; for it is one thing that the bread is finished, another that the web is finished: the one that it should not be, the other that it should be perfected.
He therefore who believes in Christ, himself fulfils the law, because toward him our whole intention ought to tend and hasten, since beyond him there is nothing further to seek, because all things are fulfilled, whatsoever were foretold of him in the holy Scriptures. To everyone who believes. To Jew and Greek. But Moses wrote that the righteousness which is of the law, the man who does it. Moses indeed spoke of the law according to the literal history, but the Apostle applies it to Christ, because the law was neither in heaven, nor in the abyss, and therefore he commands them always to meditate on the law, that they may there find Christ. He shall live in it. But the righteousness which is of faith speaks thus.
No one of them therefore lives, because no one does it, for in comparison with sins so great, even if there were a few who did it, they would be believed to be as nothing. Do not say in your heart: 'Who shall ascend into heaven?' that is, to bring Christ down: or, 'Who shall descend into the abyss?' that is, to call Christ back from the dead. But what does the Scripture say? 'The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart.' That is, you ought not in your heart to doubt anything concerning his Passion, nor his Resurrection, nor his Ascension, as though it was not done by himself. This is the word of faith, which we preach. This is the New Testament. Because if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you shall be saved.
The testimony of the heart is the confession of the mouth. For with the heart man believes unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. Of past sins, not of future. Therefore if faith suffices unto righteousness, and confession unto salvation, Jew and Greek are one in Christ. For the Scripture says: 'Everyone who believes in him shall not be confounded.' Not the Jew only. For there is no distinction of Jew and Greek. Of former sin or of idolatry: you cannot therefore confound those whom the Scripture says cannot be confounded. (Here begins an exposition excerpted from the book of Saint Augustine, from the passage 'To Saint Simplicianus,' concerning Jacob and Esau;
although it may not seem to fit in the order of this treatise, yet it has not been passed over, because it is necessary and complete, and on that account it has been written down here, so that, the obscurity of the passage itself being revealed, it may evidently illuminate the reader's understanding.) It was said not of works, but of him who calls: 'That the elder shall serve the younger.' The grace, therefore, is of him who calls; and good works consequently belong to him who receives the grace: not works that beget grace, but works that are begotten by grace: for fire does not heat in order that it may be fervent, but because it is fervent. Nor does a wheel run well in order that it may be round, but because it is round. So no one works well in order that he may receive grace, but because he has received it. For how can he live justly, who has not been justified?
How can he live holily, if he has not been sanctified? or live at all, who has not been justified (or, in another reading, quickened)? But grace justifies, so that the justified may be able to live justly. First therefore is grace, second are good works, as he says in another place: 'But to him who works, the reward is not reckoned according to grace, but according to debt.' For they did not understand that by the very fact that it is evangelical grace, it is not owed to works: otherwise grace is now no longer grace. In many places he often testifies this, setting the grace of faith before works: not that he may extinguish works, but that he may show that works do not precede grace, but follow it:
namely, that no one may suppose that he has received grace because he has done well; but rather that he cannot do well, unless through faith he has received grace. But a man begins to receive grace from the time when he begins to believe in God, being moved to faith by an inner or an outer admonition. Yet it matters at what points of time, or by the celebration of the sacraments, the fuller and more evident grace is poured in. But that we may speak rather of the matter under discussion, these things are recalled in order to break and cast down the pride of men ungrateful to the grace of God, and daring to glory in their own merits. For when they were not yet born, nor had done anything good or evil, it was said not of works, but of him who calls: 'That the elder shall serve the younger.'
The grace, therefore, is of him who calls. If then it is election through foreknowledge, and God foreknew the faith of Jacob, whence do you prove that he did not also choose him out of works? If for this reason, because they were not yet born, and had not yet done anything good or evil; likewise none of them had yet believed either: but, as foreknowledge saw that he would believe, so foreknowledge could have seen that he would work. So that, just as he is said to be chosen on account of future faith, which God foreknew, so another might say that he was rather chosen on account of future works, which God nonetheless foreknew. Wherefore, how does the Apostle show that it was said not of works: 'The elder shall serve the younger'?
If it be because they were not yet born, then not only was it not said of works, but neither was it said of faith, because both were lacking in those not yet born. Not therefore by foreknowledge either did he will it to be understood that the election of the younger was made, so that the elder should serve him. For, wishing to show that it was not made of works, he therefore added, saying: 'For when they were not yet born, nor had done anything good or evil.' Otherwise it could be said to him: but God already knew who would do what. Wherefore it is asked, whence that election was made; because if not of works, which were not in those not yet born, nor of faith, because that also was not there. Whence then?
Or must it be said that there was no election, since there existed no diversity in the mother's womb, whether of faith, or of works, or of any merits whatsoever? But it was said: 'That the purpose of God according to election might stand.' And therefore we inquire, because it was said: unless perhaps the sentence is to be distinguished thus, not so that we understand that it was said 'not of works, but of him who calls: The elder shall serve the younger,' as though for this end, that the purpose of God according to election might stand; but rather thus, that this example be taken as given concerning those not yet born and not yet having done anything, lest any election be here understood. For when they were not yet born, nor had done anything good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand:
that is, they had not yet done anything good or evil, so that on account of that very action any election of him who had done well might be made. Since therefore there was no election of one doing well, according to which the purpose of God might stand, it was said not of works, but of him who calls: that is, of him who by calling to faith justifies the ungodly by grace: 'That the elder shall serve the younger.' Not therefore that the purpose of God might stand according to election, but by election from the purpose; that is, not because God found good works in men which he might choose, does the purpose of his justification stand: but because that stands, that he may justify believers, therefore he finds works which he may then choose unto the kingdom of the taken. For unless there were an election, there would be no elect, nor would it rightly be said:
'Who shall accuse against the elect of God?' Yet election does not precede justification, but justification precedes election. For no one is chosen, unless he is already distinct from him who is rejected. Whence, as to what is said, that God chose us before the foundation of the world, I do not see how it is said, except by foreknowledge. But here, where he says: 'It was said to her not of works, but of him who calls, that the elder shall serve the younger,' he willed it to be understood not by an election of merits, which come after the justification of grace, but by the liberality of God's gifts, lest anyone be exalted over works. 'For by the grace of God we have been saved: and this not of works, but it is the gift of God: not of works, lest perhaps anyone be exalted.'
But it is asked, whether either faith merits a man's justification, or whether even the merits of faith do not precede the mercy of God, but faith itself also is numbered among the gifts of grace. Since even in this place, when he had said 'not of works,' he did not say, 'but it was said to her of faith, that the elder shall serve the younger'; but he said: 'But of him who calls': for no one believes who is not called. And a merciful God calls: bestowing this by no merits even of faith, because the merits of faith follow the calling rather than precede it. 'For how shall they believe in him whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?' Unless therefore the mercy of God precede by calling, no one can even believe, so as to begin thereby to be justified, and to receive the ability of working well.
Therefore before every merit is grace. For indeed Christ died for the ungodly. From him who calls, then, the younger receives it, not from any merits of his own works, that the elder should serve him; so that even what is written, 'Jacob I loved,' is of God who calls, not of Jacob who works. And what next of Esau, that he serves the younger, and what is written: 'But Esau I hated': by what evils of his own did he merit this, since he too had not yet been born, nor had done anything good or evil, when it was said: 'And the elder shall serve the younger'? Or is it perhaps that, just as that word concerning Jacob was said with no merits of a good action, so Esau is hateful with no merits of an evil action?
For if, because God foreknew his future evil works, he therefore predestined him to serve the younger, then he likewise predestined Jacob, that the elder should serve him, because he foreknew his future good works: and then it is already false what he says, 'not of works.' But if it is true that it is 'not of works,' and he proves this from the fact that it was said of those not yet born, nor having yet done anything: whence it is also not of faith, which likewise was not yet in those not yet born, by what merit is Esau hated before he was born? For that God made the things which he would love, there is no question. But if we should say that he made the things which he would hate, it is absurd, another Scripture meeting us and saying: 'Neither did you establish anything in hatred;'
'and you hated none of the things which you have made, or have established.' For by what merit was the sun made? or what did the moon offend, that it should be so much inferior to it? or what did it earn, that it should be created so much brighter than the other stars? But all things were created good, each in its own kind. For God would not say: 'The sun I loved, but the moon I hated'; or: 'The moon I loved, but the stars I hated': as he said: 'Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.' But he loved all those things, though ordered in diverse degrees of excellence: since God saw that they were good, being established by his word! But that he should have hated Esau, unless by the merit of injustice, is unjust. And if we grant this, then Jacob too begins to be loved by the merit of righteousness.
But if that is true, then it is false that it is 'not of works.' Or is it perhaps of the righteousness of faith? What then does it help you, 'For when they were not yet born'? since in one not yet born not even the righteousness of faith could exist. And so the Apostle saw what could occur to the mind of the hearer or reader from these words, and at once he added: 'What then shall we say? Is there injustice with God? God forbid.' And as though teaching how it is not: 'For he says to Moses,' he says, 'I will have mercy on whom I have had mercy, and I will show mercy to whom I have been merciful.' By which words did he solve the question, or rather more tightly bind it together? For it is this very thing that most disturbs us:
if he has mercy on whom he will have had mercy, and shows mercy to whom he will have been merciful, why was this mercy lacking to Esau, that through it he too might be good, just as through it Jacob was made good? Or was it said, 'I will have mercy on whom I have had mercy, and I will show mercy to whom I have been merciful,' for this reason: because on whom God has had mercy, that he may call him, he will have mercy on him that he may believe; and to whom he has been merciful that he may believe, he will show mercy, that is, he will make him merciful, that he may also work well? Whence we are admonished that no one ought to glory or be exalted even in the very works of mercy, as though he had earned God by them as by his own:
since, that he might have that very mercy, he bestowed it who will show mercy to whom he will have been merciful. But if anyone boasts that he merited it by believing, let him know that he who has mercy bestowed upon him that he should believe, by inspiring the faith of him on whom he had mercy: that he might impart the calling to one still unbelieving. For now the believer is distinguished from the ungodly. 'For what have you,' he says, 'that you did not receive? But if you received it, why do you glory as if you had not received it?' This indeed is right; but why was this mercy withdrawn from Esau, so that he was not so called, that even, being called, faith might be inspired in him, and believing he might become merciful, that he might work well? Or is it perhaps because he was unwilling?
If therefore Jacob believed because he willed, then God did not give him faith, but he bestowed it upon himself by willing, and had something which he did not receive. Or is it because no one can believe unless he wills; yet no one wills unless he is called? but no one can bestow upon himself that he should be called: by calling, God bestows both, and faith too, because without calling no one can believe, although no one believes unwilling. 'For how shall they believe in him whom they have not heard? or how shall they hear without a preacher?' No one therefore believes who is not called, but not everyone who is called believes; for many are called, but few are chosen. Assuredly those who did not despise him who calls, but followed by believing, without doubt believed willingly. What then of that which follows?
'Therefore it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy.' Or is it because we cannot even will unless we are called: and our willing avails nothing, unless God help us to bring it to completion? It is necessary, then, to will to run. For it would not be said in vain: 'On earth peace to men of good will.' And: 'So run, that you may obtain.' Yet it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy, that we both attain what we will, and reach whither we will. Esau therefore was unwilling, and did not run; but even if he had willed and had run, he would have attained by the help of God, who would bestow upon him by calling both to will and to run, unless, the calling being despised, he became reprobate. For in one way God bestows that we may will; in another he bestows what we shall have willed.
For that we may will, he willed it to be both his and ours: his by calling, ours by following. But what we shall have willed, he alone bestows: that is, the power to act well, and always to live blessedly. Nevertheless Esau, not yet born, could neither will nor be unwilling in any of these things. Why then, being placed in the womb, was he disapproved? For we return to those difficulties, more troublesome not only by their own obscurity, but also by our now many repetitions. Why indeed was Esau reprobated not yet born, who could neither believe him who calls, nor despise the calling, nor work anything good or evil? If by the foreknowledge of his future evil will, why was not Jacob also approved by the foreknowledge of God of his future good will?
But if once you have granted that anyone could be either approved or disapproved from that which was not yet in him, but because God foreknew that it would be: he is convicted, that is, he could also be approved from works, which God foreknew would be in him, although he had not yet done anything. And it will help you nothing at all that they were not yet born, when it was said: 'The elder shall serve the younger': so as to show thereby that it was said not of works, because no one had yet worked. Those words too, if he attend to them diligently, 'Therefore it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy': the Apostle will not seem to have said this only for the reason that we attain by God's help to that which we will:
but also with that intention with which he says in another place: 'Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. For it is God who works in you both to will and to work, according to his good will.' Where he sufficiently shows that even the good will itself comes to be in us by God working it. For if it were said 'Not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy' only for this reason, that the will of man alone does not suffice for us to live rightly and justly, unless we are helped by the mercy of God: it could also be said in this manner: 'Therefore it is not of God who shows mercy, but of man who wills': because the mercy of God alone does not suffice, unless the consent of our will be added. But that is manifest, that we will in vain, unless God have mercy.
But in what sense it can be said that God has mercy in vain unless we too are willing, I do not know. For if God has mercy, we are also willing; indeed, it belongs to that very mercy that we should will. For it is God who works in us both to will and to work according to good will. For if we should ask whether a good will is a gift of God, it would be astonishing if anyone dared to deny it. But because good will does not precede the calling, but the calling precedes good will, therefore it is rightly attributed to God who calls that we will well; yet it cannot be attributed to us that we are called. It must not, then, be supposed that the words 'It is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy' were said because, except by his aid, we cannot obtain what we will;
but rather because, unless by his calling, we do not will at all. But if that calling is so productive of good will that every one who is called follows it, how will it be true that 'Many are called, but few are chosen'? For if this is true, and the one called consequently obeys the calling, and it lies within his own will not to obey, then it can also rightly be said: 'Therefore it is not of God that shows mercy, but of man that wills and runs,' since the mercy of him who calls does not suffice unless obedience follows the calling. Or is it perhaps that those who, called in this manner, do not perceive [others read: do not consent], might, if called in another manner, be able to bend their will to faith, and so that too be true: 'Many are called, but few are chosen'?
so that, although many are called in one and the same manner, yet because not all are affected in the same way, only those follow the calling who are found fit to receive it; and that this also be no less true: 'Therefore it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy,' because he called in a manner that was suited to those who followed the calling. But to others the calling did indeed come; yet because it was of such a kind that they could not be moved by it, nor were they fit to receive it, they can be said to be called, but not chosen. And likewise it is not equally true that 'Therefore it is not of God that shows mercy, but of man that wills and runs,' since the effect of God's mercy cannot be within man's power, so that God should have mercy in vain if man be unwilling;
because if he should will to have mercy even on such men, it would be needful so to call them in the manner that was fitting for them, that we should be moved, and understand, and follow. It is therefore true: 'Many are called, but few are chosen.' For those are the chosen who were fittingly called; but those who were not in harmony with, nor complied with, the calling are the not-chosen, because they did not follow, though they were called. Likewise it is true: 'It is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy,' who, even though he call many, yet has mercy upon those whom he so calls that they are called in the manner fitting for them to follow. But it is false if anyone says: 'Therefore it is not of God that shows mercy, but of man that wills and runs,' because God has mercy upon no one in vain.
But him on whom he has mercy, he so calls as he knows to be fitting for him, that he may not spurn the one who calls. Here someone says: Why then was Esau not so called that he should be willing to obey? For we see that different men are moved to believe in different ways by the very same things when shown or signified: as, for example, Simeon believed in our Lord Jesus Christ while he was yet a little infant, recognizing him by the revelation of the Spirit. Nathanael, at one single saying which he heard from him, 'Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you,' answered: 'Rabbi, you are the Son of God, you are the King of Israel.' And because Peter, long afterward, confessed the same, he was counted worthy to hear that he was blessed, and that the keys of the kingdom of heaven would be given to him.
When the miracle was wrought in Cana of Galilee, which the Evangelist records as the beginning of signs, water being turned into wine, his disciples believed in him. He invited many to faith by his speaking; yet many did not believe even when the dead were raised. Terrified by his cross and death, even the disciples wavered, and yet the thief believed at that very time, when he saw him not more excellent in works, but his equal in the fellowship of the cross. One also of the number of the disciples believed after his resurrection, not so much by his living members as by his fresh scars. Many of the number of those by whom he was crucified, who while he lived had despised him as he worked miracles, believed when the disciples preached him and did such things in his name.
Since, then, one man is moved to faith in this way, another in that, and the same thing spoken in one manner moves, while spoken in another manner it does not move, and moves one man while it does not move another, who would dare to say that God lacked a manner of calling by which he might have brought even Esau's mind to that faith, and joined his will to it, in which Jacob was justified? But if there can be so great an obstinacy of the will that the aversion of the mind grows hard against all manners of calling, it is asked whether that very hardness be of divine punishment. For when God deserts a man by not calling him thus, how can he be moved to faith? For who would say that a manner by which he might be persuaded to believe was lacking even to the Almighty? But why do we inquire this, when the Apostle himself adds it?
For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: 'For this very purpose have I raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.' Now the Apostle adjoined this proof to establish what he had said above: 'Therefore it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy.' As if he said: Whence do you teach this? For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: 'For this purpose have I raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth,' which certainly shows here that it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy. He therefore concludes: 'Therefore he has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens,' since above the two were not both stated. For it was not said in the same way,
'It is not of him that wills, but of God that shows mercy,' as it was also said, 'It is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that hardens.' From which it is given to understand that what he set below—'Therefore he has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens'—can so agree with the earlier statement that the hardening by God be to be unwilling to have mercy; so that nothing be inflicted by him whereby a man becomes worse, but only that whereby he might become better be withheld. But if this be done without any distinction of merits, who would not break out into that cry which the Apostle himself set as an objection: 'You will therefore say to me, Why does he yet find fault? For who resists his will?'
For the Spirit often complains of men, as appears through innumerable passages of the Scriptures, because they are unwilling to believe and to live rightly. Whence the faithful, and those who do the will of God, are said to walk without complaint, because the Scripture does not complain of them. But why does he complain, he says: 'For who resists his will,' when he has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens? And yet let us look at what precedes, and thence let us direct our opinion, so far as the Lord himself helps. For he says a little before: 'What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.' Let this, then, be fixed and immovable in a mind of sober piety and steadfast faith, that there is no unrighteousness with God.
And let it be most tenaciously and firmly believed that this very thing—that God has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens, that is, on whom he wills he has mercy, and on whom he wills not he has not mercy—belongs to a certain hidden equity, unsearchable by any human measure, which is to be observed even in human and earthly transactions themselves; for unless we held certain impressed traces of the supernal justice in these, the intention of our infirmity would never take up nor aspire toward the very couch and most chaste and most holy inner sanctuary of spiritual precepts. 'Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after justice, for they shall be filled.'
In this drought, therefore, of our life and mortal condition, unless there were sprinkled from above, as it were, some most tenuous breeze of justice, we would too quickly wither. Wherefore, since human society is knit together among men by giving and receiving, and since things owed or not owed are both given and received, who does not see that no one can be convicted of injustice who exacts what is owed to him, nor certainly he who chooses to remit what is owed to him? but that this lies not within the discretion of those who are debtors, but of him to whom it is owed. This is the image, or, as I said above, the trace impressed upon the dealings of men from the loftiest height of equity. All men, then, are—since, as the Apostle says:
'In Adam all die,' from whom the origin of offense against God is drawn down upon the whole human race—one certain lump of sin, owing punishment to the divine and supreme justice; which, whether it be exacted or remitted, there is no injustice. But from whom it should be exacted and to whom remitted, the debtors judge proudly. Just as those hired for that vineyard were unjustly indignant when as much was given to others as was rendered to themselves. And therefore the Apostle so blunts the questions of this shamelessness: 'O man, who are you that answer back to God?' For he does answer back to God when this displeases him, that God complains of sinners;
as though God compelled anyone to sin, whereas he merely does not lavish the mercy of his justification upon certain sinners, and on this account is said to harden certain sinners, because he does not have mercy on them, not because he impels them to sin. But he has not mercy on those to whom, by an equity most hidden and most remote from human perceptions, he judges that mercy is not to be extended. For 'his judgments are unsearchable, and his ways past finding out.' But he complains of sinners as of those whom he himself does not compel to sin; and at the same time also so that those on whom he has mercy may have this calling too, that while God complains of sinners, they may be pricked in heart and be converted to his grace.
Justly, then, and mercifully does he complain. But if this troubles you, that no one resists his will, because to whom he wills he brings aid, and whom he wills he deserts—since both he to whom he brings aid, and he whom he deserts, are of the same lump of sinners, and, although both owe punishment, yet from one it is exacted, to the other it is remitted—if, then, this troubles you: 'You, who are you that answer back to God?' Let only this be held with unshaken faith, that there is no unrighteousness with God, who, whether he remit or exact the debt, neither can he from whom he exacts it rightly complain of his injustice, nor ought he to whom he remits it to glory in his own merits. For the one will render nothing but what is owed; and the other has nothing but what he received.
For indeed that hardening of the impious demonstrates both things: what is to be feared, so that each one may by piety be converted to God, and how great thanks are to be rendered for the mercy of God, who in the punishment of some shows what he bestows upon others. But if that which he exacts of some is not a just penalty, he bestows nothing upon the others of whom he does not exact it. But because that penalty is just, and there is no unrighteousness with God who takes vengeance, who could suffice to give thanks to him who remits this which, if he willed to exact it, no one could rightly say he did not owe? 'Whom also he called': 'Us,' he says, 'not only from among the Jews, but also from among the Gentiles'; that is, the vessels of mercy which he prepared unto glory. For not all the Jews, but of the Jews;
nor absolutely all men of the Gentiles, but of the Gentiles. For there is one lump of sinners and of the impious from Adam, in which Jews and Gentiles, apart from the grace of God, belong to one same mass. For if the potter of clay makes from the same mass one vessel unto honor, another unto dishonor, it is manifest that from among the Jews some vessels are unto honor, others unto dishonor, just as from among the Gentiles: it follows that all are understood to belong to one mass. 'If the number of the sons of Israel be,' he says, 'as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved.' The rest, therefore, of the crowd are vessels drawn out unto perdition. 'For a word consummating and abridging,' he says, 'the Lord shall make upon the earth':
that is, that by the summary of faith through grace he may save those who believe; not through the innumerable observances by which that multitude was servilely burdened and oppressed. For by grace has the word consummating and abridging done this for us upon the earth, saying: 'My yoke is easy, and my burden is light.' Which is also said a little after here: 'The word is near, in your mouth and in your heart: this is the word of faith which we preach; that if you confess with your mouth that God raised him from the dead, you shall be saved. For with the heart one believes unto justice, but with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.' This is the word consummating and abridging, which God made upon the earth;
by which consummation and brevity that man too was justified who, with all his limbs fastened to the cross, and having these two free, believed with the heart unto justice, and confessed with the mouth unto salvation, and forthwith was counted worthy to hear: 'Today you shall be with me in paradise.' For his good works would have followed, if, having received grace, he had lived long among men. Yet they had not preceded, so that he should merit that same grace, being fastened to the cross out of brigandage, and from the cross translated into paradise. 'And as Isaiah foretold,' he says, 'Unless the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we had become as Sodom, and been made like unto Gomorrah.' What here he says, 'had left us a seed,' is there: 'a remnant shall be saved.'
But the rest, the vessels of perdition, undergo their due punishment. And that not all perished like Sodom and Gomorrah, this was not their merit, but the grace of God who left them a seed, whence another harvest might spring up throughout the whole world. This too a little after: 'So then,' he says, 'even at this present time there is a remnant according to the election of grace. And if by grace, then it is no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace.' What then? What Israel sought, this it has not obtained; but the election has obtained it, and the rest were blinded. The vessels of mercy have obtained it; the vessels of wrath were blinded: yet from the same mass.
For who shall discuss the works of the Lord, who from the same mass condemns one and justifies another? Free choice of the will avails much: nay, this is indeed true, but among those sold under sin, what does it avail? 'The flesh,' he says, 'lusts against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh, so that you do not do the things that you would.' It is commanded that we live rightly, with this reward set before us, that we may merit to live blessedly in eternity. But who can live rightly and work well, unless justified by faith? It is commanded that we believe, so that, having received the gift of the Holy Spirit, we may through love be able to work well. But who can believe, unless he be touched by some calling, that is, by some testimony of things?
Who has it in his power that his mind be touched by such a vision as would move his will to faith? And who embraces in his soul anything that does not delight him? Or who has it in his power that there should even present itself something able to delight him, or that it should delight him when it presents itself? When, therefore, those things delight us by which we advance toward God, this is inspired, and the grace of God is furnished, not procured by our own nod and industry, or by the merit of works; for that there be a movement of the will, that there be industry of zeal, that there be works fervent with charity, he grants, he lavishes. We are bidden to ask, that we may receive; to seek, that we may find; and to knock, that it may be opened to us;
Is not our very prayer sometimes so listless, or rather cold and almost nothing, that we do not even advert to this in ourselves with sorrow? For if we even grieve at this, we are already praying. What else, then, is shown to us, except that both to ask, and to seek, and to knock is granted by him who bids that we do these things? 'Therefore it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shows mercy,' since we can neither will nor run except by his admonishing and rousing us. But if some election takes place, so that we should understand what was said,
'A remnant was saved according to the election of grace'—not that there is an election of the already justified unto eternal life, but that those be chosen who are to be justified—surely this election is so hidden that in the same mass it cannot at all appear to us; or, if it appears to certain persons, I in this matter confess my own weakness. For I have nothing to look upon in choosing men unto saving grace, if I am permitted by some thought to submit this election to examination, except either greater talents, or lesser sins, or both—let us add too, if you please, honest and useful learning.
Whoever, then, shall be ensnared and stained with the fewest sins (for who can be with none?), and keen in talent, and polished with liberal arts, seems to be one to be chosen unto grace. But when I have determined this, he who chose the weak things of the world to confound the strong, and the foolish things of the world to confound the wise, so confounds me, that, gazing upon him and corrected by shame, I laugh at myself for deriding many, and preferring men more chaste than certain sinners, and orators before certain fishermen. Do we not notice many of our faithful walking in the way of God who are in no respect to be compared in talent—I will not say to certain heretics, but even to actors?
Likewise, do we not see certain men of either sex living without complaint in conjugal chastity, and yet either heretics, or pagans, or even so lukewarm in the true faith and true Church, that we marvel to see them surpassed—by harlots and stage-players suddenly converted—not only in patience and temperance, but even in faith, hope, and charity? It remains, therefore, that the wills are chosen; but the will itself can in no way be moved unless something present itself which delights and invites the mind. But that this should present itself is not in man's power. What did Saul will but to invade, drag off, bind, slay Christians? How rabid a will, how furious, how blind!
Yet he, prostrated by one voice from above, when there presented itself such a vision as would, with his savagery broken, turn back and correct that mind and will unto faith, was suddenly, out of a marvelous persecutor of the Gospel, made a still more marvelous preacher of it. And yet what do we say? Is there unrighteousness with God, who exacts from whom it pleases him, and gives to whom it pleases him—who by no means exacts what is not owed, by no means gives what is another's? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. Yet why to this man thus, and to that man not thus? O man, who are you? If you do not render the debt, you have cause to rejoice; if you render it, you have no cause to complain. Let us only believe,
even though we are not able to comprehend it, since he who made and founded the whole creation, both spiritual and corporeal, disposes all things in number, and weight, and measure; but his judgments are unsearchable, and his ways past finding out. Let us say Alleluia, and together sing the song, and let us not say: Why this? or, Why here? For all things were created in their own time.