📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Collected Works

Tertullian

Collected Works 25 part 2/2

Latin original · 34 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 25:39–25:72 (72 verses in all)

← ch. 24ch. 26 →
← prev part
25:39
XIV nunc interposito nomine idololatriae, quod solum subiectum sufficere debet ad abdicationem spectaculorum, alia iam ratione tractemus ex abundanti, propter eos maxime qui sibi blandiuntur quod non nominatim abstinentia ista praescripta sit. quasi parum etiam de spectaculis pronuntietur, cum concupiscentiae saeculi damnantur. nam sicut pecuniae vel dignitatis vel gulae vel libidinis vel gloriae, ita et voluptatis concupiscentia est; species autem voluptatis etiam spectacula. opinor, generaliter nominatae concupiscentiae continent in se et voluptates, aeque generaliter intellectae voluptates specialiter et in spectacula disseruntur.
XIV. Now, having interposed the name of idolatry—which alone, as a subject, ought to suffice for the renunciation of the spectacles—let us treat the matter on another principle, over and above, chiefly on account of those who flatter themselves that this abstinence has not been expressly prescribed by name; as though too little were pronounced concerning the spectacles when the concupiscences of the world are condemned. For just as there is a concupiscence of money, or of dignity, or of the gullet, or of lust, or of glory, so also there is a concupiscence of pleasure; and spectacles are a species of pleasure. I suppose that the concupiscences named generally contain in themselves the pleasures also, and the pleasures likewise understood generally are expounded specifically also into the spectacles.
第十四章。如今,既已插入偶像崇拜之名——單這一點作為題旨,就理當足以使人棄絕觀劇——讓我們額外地、再依另一原則來處理此事,主要是為著那些自我安慰的人,他們以為這種戒絕並未被逐字明文規定;彷彿當世界的種種私慾被定罪時,關於觀劇所宣告的還嫌太少似的。因為正如有對金錢、對地位、對口腹、對情慾、對榮耀的私慾,同樣也有對享樂的私慾;而觀劇正是享樂的一個種類。我認為,泛言所稱的種種私慾,其本身也包含了種種享樂,而同樣泛言所理解的種種享樂,也具體地延伸到觀劇之中。
25:40
XV ceterum rettulimus supra de locorum condicione, quod non per semetipsa nos inquinent, sed per ea quae illic geruntur, per quae, simul inquinamentum combiberunt, tunc etiam in alteros respuunt. viderit ergo, ut diximus, principalis titulus, idololatria; reliquas ipsarum rerum qualitates contrarias dei omnes feramus. deus praecepit spiritum sanctum, utpote pro naturae suae bono tenerum et delicatum, tranquillitate et lenitate et quiete et pace tractare, non furore, non bile, non ira, non dolore inquietare. huic quomodo cum spectaculis poterit convenire? omne enim spectaculum sine concussione spiritus non est. ubi enim voluptas, ibi et studium, per quod scilicet voluptas sapit;
XV. For the rest, we have related above concerning the condition of places, that they do not defile us through themselves, but through the things which are done there, through which, when they have drunk in the defilement, they then spit it back upon others also. Let the principal title, then, as we have said, be seen to—idolatry; the remaining qualities of the things themselves, all contrary to God, let us bring forward. God has commanded that the Holy Spirit—being, according to the goodness of His nature, tender and delicate—be treated with tranquillity and gentleness and quiet and peace, not disturbed by frenzy, by bile, by anger, by grief. How, then, will He be able to agree with the spectacles? For no spectacle is without a shaking of the spirit. For where there is pleasure, there also is eagerness, through which, of course, pleasure has its savour;
第十五章。至於其餘,我們在前面已就場所的境況作了陳述,說它們並非藉自身玷污我們,而是藉在其中所行之事,這些事既吸盡了污穢,便又把它吐回在他人身上。那麼,如我們所說,讓那主要的名目——偶像崇拜——先受審視;至於這些事物本身其餘的、皆與神相悖的性質,讓我們一併提出。神吩咐說,聖靈——按其本性的良善而言是溫柔嬌嫩的——要以安詳、溫和、寧靜與平安待之,不可用狂暴、用怒氣、用忿怒、用悲痛去攪擾祂。那麼,祂怎能與觀劇相合呢?因為沒有一場觀劇是不伴隨心靈的震盪的。因為凡有享樂之處,也就有熱切,享樂當然是藉這熱切而有其滋味;
25:41
ubi studium, ibi et aemulatio, per quam studium sapit. porro et ubi aemulatio, ibi et furor et bilis et ira et dolor et cetera ex his, quae cum his non conpetunt disciplinae. nam et si qui modeste et probe spectaculis fruitur pro dignitatis vel aetatis vel etiam naturae suae condicione, non tamen immobilis animi est et sine tacita spiritus passione. nemo ad voluptatem venit sine affectu, nemo affectum sine casibus suis patitur. ipsi casus incitamenta sunt affectus. ceterum si cessat affectus, nulla est voluptas, et est reus iam ille vanitatis eo conveniens, ubi nihil consequitur. puto autem etiam vanitas extranea est nobis.
where there is eagerness, there also is rivalry, through which eagerness has its savour. Further, where there is rivalry, there also are frenzy and bile and anger and grief and the other things that follow from these, which do not accord with discipline. For even if someone enjoys the spectacles modestly and properly, according to the condition of his dignity or age or even his nature, still he is not of unmoved mind and without a silent passion of the spirit. No one comes to pleasure without emotion, no one suffers emotion without its own reverses. The very reverses are the incitements of emotion. Otherwise, if emotion ceases, there is no pleasure, and that man is already guilty of vanity, coming there where he attains nothing. But I think that even vanity is foreign to us.
凡有熱切之處,也就有競逐,熱切是藉這競逐而有其滋味。再者,凡有競逐之處,也就有狂暴、怒氣、忿怒、悲痛,以及由這些而來的其他事物,這些都與規訓不合。因為即便有人按其地位、年齡、甚至本性的境況,謹慎而端正地享受觀劇,他仍不是心不為所動、沒有心靈暗中的激情。沒有人是不帶情感而來就享樂的,沒有人受了情感的觸動而不伴隨其自身的起伏。這些起伏本身正是情感的煽動。反過來說,若情感止息,就沒有享樂,而那人便已犯了虛妄之罪,因他去到那毫無所得之處。而我認為,甚至連虛妄對我們也是陌生的。
25:42
quid quod et ipse se iudicat inter eos positus, quorum se similem nolens utique detestatorem confitetur? nobis satis non est, si ipsi nihil tale facimus, nisi et talia factitantibus non conferamur. "si furem" inquit "videbas, concurrebas cum eo." utinam ne in saeculo quidem simul cum illis moraremur! sed tamen in saecularibus separamur, quia saeculum dei est, saecularia autem diaboli. XVI cum ergo furor interdicitur nobis, ab omni spectaculo auferimur, etiam a circo, ubi proprie furor praesidet. aspice populum ad id spectaculum iam cum furore venientem, iam tumultuosum, iam caecum, iam de sponsionibus concitatum. tardus est illi praetor, semper oculi in urna eius cum sortibus volutantur.
And what of this, that he even judges himself, placed among those to whom, unwilling to be counted like, he certainly confesses himself an abhorrer? For us it is not enough if we ourselves do nothing of such a kind, unless we also do not associate with those who habitually do such things. 'If you saw a thief,' he says, 'you ran along with him.' Would that we might not so much as tarry in the world at the same time together with them! But nevertheless, in worldly matters we are separated, because the world is God's, but worldly things are the devil's. XVI. Since, then, frenzy is forbidden to us, we are taken away from every spectacle, and even from the circus, where frenzy properly presides. Behold the people coming to that spectacle already with frenzy, already tumultuous, already blind, already excited over their wagers. The praetor is too slow for them; their eyes are ever rolling, together with the lots, in his urn.
何況這一點:他甚至審判了自己,因他置身於那些人之中,而他既不願被算作與他們同類,就無疑承認自己是他們的憎惡者。對我們來說,僅僅我們自己不做這類事還不夠,除非我們也不與那些慣行這類事的人相交。經上說:「你若看見盜賊,就與他同跑。」但願我們連在世上與他們同時共處都不要有!然而,在屬世的事上我們是分別出來的,因為世界是屬神的,屬世之物卻是屬魔鬼的。第十六章。既然狂暴為我們所禁止,我們就從每一場觀劇中被領離,甚至也離開競技場,因為狂暴正是在那裡主掌一切。看那眾人來到那場觀劇時,已然帶著狂暴、已然喧鬧、已然盲目、已然為他們的賭注而亢奮。裁判官在他們看來太慢了;他們的眼睛不斷地與他甕中的籤一同滾動。
25:43
dehinc ad signum anxii pendent, unius dementiae una vox est. cognosce dementiam de vanitate: "misit", dicunt et nuntiant invicem quod simul ab omnibus visum est. teneo testimonium caecitatis: non vident missum quid sit; mappam putant, sed est diaboli ab alto praecipitati figura. ex eo itaque itur in furias et animos et discordias et quicquid non licet sacerdotibus pacis. inde maledicta, convicia sine iustitia odii, etiam suffragia sine merito amoris. quid enim suum consecuturi sunt, qui illic agunt, qui sui non sunt? nisi forte hoc solum, per quod sui non sunt: de aliena infelicitate contristantur, de aliena felicitate laetantur. quicquid optant, quicquid abominantur, extraneum ab iis est;
Then in anxiety they hang upon the signal; there is one voice of one madness. Recognize the madness from its vanity: 'He has thrown!' they say, and announce to one another what has been seen by all at the same moment. I hold their testimony of blindness: they do not see what has been thrown; they think it a napkin, but it is the figure of the devil cast down from on high. And so from this they go off into furies and passions and discords, and whatever is not lawful for the priests of peace. Thence come curses, revilings without the justice of hatred, and even applause without the merit of love. What of their own are they going to obtain, who act there, who are not their own? Unless perhaps this alone, through which they are not their own: they are saddened at another's misfortune, they rejoice at another's good fortune. Whatever they desire, whatever they abominate, is foreign to them;
接著他們在焦慮中注視那信號;同一種瘋狂只有同一種呼喊。從那虛妄中認出那瘋狂吧:他們喊道:「他扔了!」並彼此宣告那在同一瞬間為眾人所見之事。我掌握了他們盲目的證據:他們並沒有看見所扔的是什麼;他們以為那是一塊手帕,其實那是從高處被拋下的魔鬼的形象。於是他們由此陷入狂怒、激情和爭執,以及一切為和平的祭司所不合宜之事。由此而來的是咒罵、沒有正當恨意的辱罵,甚至是沒有正當愛意的喝采。那些在那裡行動、卻不屬自己的人,能為自己得著什麼呢?也許唯獨這一樣,正是藉此他們不屬自己:他們為別人的不幸而憂傷,為別人的幸運而喜樂。凡他們所渴望的、凡他們所憎惡的,都是與他們毫不相干的;
25:44
ita et amor apud illos otiosus et odium iniustum. an forsitan sine causa amare liceat quam sine causa odisse? deus certe etiam cum causa prohibet odisse, qui inimicos diligi iubet; deus etiam cum causa maledicere non sinit, qui maledicentes benedici praecipit. sed circo quid amarius, ubi ne principibus quidem aut civibus suis parcunt? si quid horum, quibus circus furit, alicubi conpetit sanctis, etiam in circo licebit, si vero nusquam, ideo nec in circo. XVII similiter impudicitiam omnem amoliri iubemur. hoc igitur modo etiam a theatro separamur, quod est privatum consistorium impudicitiae, ubi nihil probatur quam quod alibi non probatur.
thus among them love too is idle and hatred unjust. Or is it perhaps permissible to love without cause more than to hate without cause? God assuredly forbids us to hate even with cause, He who commands that enemies be loved; God does not permit us to curse even with cause, He who charges that those who curse be blessed. But what is more bitter than the circus, where they do not spare even their own princes or fellow-citizens? If any of these things by which the circus rages agrees anywhere with the saints, it will be permitted even in the circus; but if nowhere, then not even in the circus. XVII. Similarly, we are bidden to put away all unchastity. In this manner, therefore, we are also separated from the theatre, which is the private consistory of unchastity, where nothing is approved but what is not approved elsewhere.
如此,在他們中間,愛也是無謂的,恨也是不義的。或者,無故地愛難道比無故地恨更為許可嗎?神確實禁止我們即使有緣由也不可恨,因為祂命令要愛仇敵;神也不許我們即使有緣由也不可咒詛,因為祂吩咐要為咒詛的人祝福。但還有什麼比競技場更苦毒的呢?在那裡,他們連自己的君王或同胞都不放過。若那些使競技場沸騰的事中有任何一樣,在何處與聖徒相合,那麼即使在競技場中也將是許可的;但若無處相合,那麼即便在競技場中也不許可。第十七章。同樣,我們奉命要摒棄一切淫亂。因此,我們也以這種方式與劇場分別出來,劇場乃是淫亂的私密議事廳,在那裡受讚許的無非是別處不受讚許之事。
25:45
ita summa gratia eius de spurcitia plurimum concinnata est, quam Atellanus gesticulatur, quam mimus etiam per muliebres repraesentat, sensum sexus et pudoris exterminans, ut facilius domi quam scaenae erubescant, quam denique pantomimus a pueritia patitur ex corpore, ut artifex esse possit. ipsa etiam prostibula, publicae libidinis hostiae, in scaena proferuntur, plus miserae in praesentia feminarum, quibus solis latebant, perque omnis aetatis, omnis dignitatis ora transducuntur; locus, stipes, elogium, etiam quibus opus non est, praedicatur, etiam (taceo de reliquis) quae in tenebris et in speluncis suis delitescere decebat, ne diem contaminarent.
Thus its highest charm is contrived mostly out of filth, which the Atellan player mimics with gestures, which the mime represents even through women, banishing the sense of sex and shame, so that they blush more easily at home than on the stage; which, finally, the pantomime endures in his body from boyhood, that he may be able to be an artist. The very harlots too, the victims of public lust, are brought forth upon the stage, more wretched in the presence of women, from whom alone they used to hide; and they are paraded before faces of every age, of every rank; their place, their fee, their record is proclaimed—even to those who have no need of it—even (I am silent about the rest) such women as it were fitting should lurk in the darkness and in their own caverns, lest they should contaminate the day.
如此,它最高的魅力大多是由污穢炮製出來的,阿特拉笑劇的演員用姿態去模仿它,啞劇演員甚至藉著女子去表演它,泯滅了性別與羞恥的觀念,以致人在家中比在舞台上更容易臉紅;最後,啞劇伶人自幼便在他身上忍受它,好使自己能成為一名藝人。就連那些娼妓,公眾淫慾的犧牲品,也被帶上舞台,在婦女面前更顯悲慘——她們本來唯獨對婦女隱藏自己;她們被在各種年齡、各種身分的人面前遊街示眾;她們的居所、她們的價碼、她們的來歷都被公然宣告——甚至向那些對此毫無所需的人宣告——甚至(其餘的我略而不談)那些理當藏匿於黑暗中、藏匿於自己巢穴中的女子,免得她們玷污白晝。
25:46
erubescat senatus, erubescant ordines omnes! ipsae illae pudoris sui interemptrices de gestibus suis ad lucem et populum expavescentes semel anno erubescunt. quodsi nobis omnis impudicitia exsecranda est, cur liceat audire quod loqui non licet, cum etiam scurrilitatem et omne vanum verbum indicatum a deo sciamus? cur aeque liceat videre quae facere flagitium est? cur quae ore prolata communicant hominem, ea per aures et oculos admissa non videantur hominem communicare, cum spiritui appareant aures et oculi nec possit mundus praestari cuius apparitores inquinantur? habes igitur et theatri interdictionem de interdictione impudicitiae.
Let the senate blush, let all the orders blush! Those very destroyers of their own modesty, dreading their own gestures in the light and before the people, blush once a year. But if all unchastity is to be execrated by us, why should it be lawful to hear what it is not lawful to speak, since we know that even scurrility and every idle word is condemned by God? Why should it be equally lawful to see what it is a disgrace to do? Why should the things which, uttered by the mouth, defile a man, not seem to defile the man when admitted through the ears and eyes—since ears and eyes are servants of the spirit, and the spirit cannot be kept clean whose attendants are defiled? You have, then, the prohibition of the theatre too, from the prohibition of unchastity.
讓元老院羞愧吧,讓所有的等級羞愧吧!那些殘害自己貞操的人,在光天化日之下、在眾人面前害怕自己的舉止,一年也羞愧一回。但若一切淫亂都當為我們所詛咒,那麼為何聽那不許說的事竟是許可的呢?既然我們知道,連粗鄙戲謔和一切閒言妄語都被神定罪。為何看那行之為恥的事竟同樣是許可的呢?為何那些由口中發出、玷污人的事,經由耳目納入時,卻似乎不玷污人呢?——既然耳目乃是靈的僕役,而靈的隨侍既受了玷污,靈就無法保持潔淨。那麼,你便從淫亂的禁令中,也得著了劇場的禁令。
25:47
si et doctrinam saecularis litteraturae ut stultitiae apud deum deputatam aspernamur, satis praescribitur nobis et de illis speciebus spectaculorum, quae saeculari litteratura lusoriam vel agonisticam scaenam dispungunt. quodsi sunt tragoediae et comoediae scelerum et libidinum auctrices cruentae et lascivae, impiae et prodigae, nullius rei aut atrocis aut vilis commemoratio melior est: quod in facto reicitur, etiam in dicto non est recipiendum. XVIII quodsi stadium contendas in scripturis nominari, sane obtinebis.
If we also spurn the teaching of secular literature as accounted foolishness in the sight of God, sufficient prescription is laid down for us concerning those kinds of spectacles too which, by means of secular literature, mark out the playful or the athletic stage. But if tragedies and comedies are the bloody and wanton, the impious and prodigal instigators of crimes and lusts, no commemoration of anything either atrocious or vile is the better for it: what is rejected in the deed is not to be received even in the telling. XVIII. But if you should contend that the stadium is named in the Scriptures, granted, you shall carry your point.
若我們也鄙棄世俗文學的教誨、視之為在神眼中的愚拙,那麼關於那些藉世俗文學而勾勒出嬉戲舞台或競技舞台的觀劇種類,也為我們定下了充分的規範。但若悲劇與喜劇乃是血腥而淫蕩、不虔敬而放縱的、罪行與情慾的煽動者,那麼對任何或殘暴或卑污之事的追述並不因此就較好些:在行為中被拒絕之事,即使在言說中也不當被接受。第十八章。但你若要辯稱賽場在聖經中被提及,那好,這一點你可以佔得上風。
25:48
sed quae in stadio geruntur, indigna conspectu tuo non negabis, pugnos et calces et colaphos et omnem petulantiam manus et quamcumque humani oris, id est divinae imaginis, depugnationem. non probabis usquam vanos cursus et iaculatus et saltus vaniores, nusquam tibi vires aut iniuriosae aut vanae placebunt, sed nec cura facticii corporis, ut plasticam dei supergressa, et propter Graeciae otium altiles homines oderis. et palaestrica diaboli negotium est: primos homines diabolus elisit. ipse gestus colubrina vis est, tenax ad occupandum, tortuosa ad obligandum, liquida ad elabendum. nullus tibi coronarum usus est; quid de coronis voluptates aucuparis?
But you will not deny that the things done in the stadium are unworthy of your gaze—fists and heels and cuffs and every insolence of the hand, and every mangling of the human face, that is, of the divine image. You will nowhere approve the vain races and casts of the javelin and the yet vainer leaps; nowhere will violence, whether injurious or vain, please you; nor even the care of a fabricated body, so as to surpass the plastic art of God; and on account of the idleness of Greece you will hate men fattened up. And the wrestling-school too is the devil's business: the devil dashed the first men to the ground. The very gesture is a serpentine force, tenacious to seize hold, tortuous to bind, fluid to slip away. There is no use of crowns for you; why do you go hunting for pleasures out of crowns?
但你不會否認,賽場中所行之事是不配你觀看的——拳頭、腳跟、耳光,以及手的一切蠻橫,還有對人面、即對神的形象的一切殘毀。你在任何地方都不會讚許那無謂的賽跑、擲標槍、以及那更無謂的跳躍;蠻力,無論是傷人的還是無謂的,在任何地方都不會取悅你;就連對一具人為鍛造之身的照料——以致超越了神的塑造之工——也不會取悅你;而為著希臘的懶散,你會憎惡那些被養肥的人。角力學校也是魔鬼的勾當:魔鬼把最初的人摔倒在地。那姿態本身就是一股蛇的力量,執著於攫取、蜿蜒於捆綁、滑溜於脫逃。花冠對你毫無用處;你何必從花冠中去獵取享樂呢?
25:49
IXX exspectabimus nunc ut et amphitheatri repudium de scripturis petamus? si saevitiam, si impietatem, si feritatem permissam nobis contendere possumus, eamus in amphitheatrum. si tales sumus quales dicimur, delectemur sanguine humano. "bonum est, cum puniuntur nocentes." quis hoc nisi nocens negabit? et tamen innocentes de supplicio alterius laetari non oportet, cum magis competat innocenti dolere, quod homo, par eius, tam nocens factus est, ut tam crudeliter impendatur. quis autem mihi sponsor est, nocentes semper vel ad bestias vel ad quodcumque supplicium decerni, ut non innocentiae quoque inferatur aut ultione iudicantis aut infirmitate defensionis aut instantia quaestionis?
XIX. Shall we now expect that we should seek from the Scriptures a repudiation of the amphitheatre also? If we can contend that savagery, that impiety, that ferocity has been permitted to us, let us go into the amphitheatre. If we are such as we are said to be, let us delight in human blood. 'It is a good thing when the guilty are punished.' Who but a guilty man will deny this? And yet it does not befit the innocent to rejoice at the punishment of another, since it rather becomes the innocent to grieve that a man, his own peer, has been made so guilty as to be so cruelly expended. But who is my surety that it is always the guilty who are condemned to the beasts, or to whatever punishment, and that it is not inflicted also upon innocence, whether by the vengeance of the judge, or the weakness of the defence, or the pressure of the torture?
第十九章。難道我們如今還要指望從聖經中尋求對圓形競技場的駁斥嗎?若我們能辯稱兇殘、不虔敬、野蠻已被許可給我們,那就讓我們進圓形競技場去吧。若我們真如人所指稱的那樣,那就讓我們以人血為樂吧。「當有罪者受懲罰時,這是件好事。」除了有罪者,誰會否認這一點呢?然而,無辜者不宜為他人受刑而歡喜,因為無辜者反倒應當憂傷:一個人,他的同類,竟被弄得如此有罪,以致如此殘忍地被斷送。但誰能向我擔保,被判給野獸、或判給任何刑罰的總是有罪者,而這刑罰不會也加在無辜者身上呢?——無論是出於審判者的報復、還是辯護的軟弱、抑或是拷問的逼迫。
25:50
quam melius ergo est nescire cum mali puniuntur, ne sciam et cum boni pereunt, si tamen bonum sapiunt. certe quidem gladiatores innocentes in ludum veneunt, ut publicae voluptatis hostiae fiant. etiam qui damnantur in ludum, quale est ut de leviore delicto in homicidas emendatione proficiant? sed haec ethnicis respondi. ceterum absit ut de istius spectaculi aversione diutius discat Christianus. quamquam nemo haec omnia plenius exprimere potest nisi qui adhuc spectat. malo non implere quam meminisse.
How much better, then, is it not to know when the wicked are punished, lest I know also when the good perish—if indeed they have a taste of good! Certainly, indeed, innocent gladiators go on sale into the training-school, that they may become the victims of the public pleasure. Even those who are condemned into the training-school—what a thing it is that from a lighter offence they should make progress into homicides by way of amendment! But these things I have answered to the heathen. For the rest, far be it that a Christian should have to learn any longer about the aversion from this kind of spectacle! Although no one can fully express all these things except one who still looks on. I would rather not complete the account than remember it.
那麼,寧可不知道惡人何時受懲罰——免得我也知道好人何時喪命,倘若他們確實有幾分善的滋味的話——這豈不好得多嗎!誠然,無辜的角鬥士被賣進角鬥學校,好使他們成為公眾取樂的犧牲品。就連那些被判入角鬥學校的人——這是何等的事:他們竟要以「改過」為名,從較輕的過犯進步成殺人者!但這些話我是回答異教徒的。至於其餘,但願一個基督徒絕不需要再去學習如何厭棄這類觀劇!雖然沒有人能充分表達這一切,除非是仍在觀看之人。我寧可不把這番陳述說完,也不願去記憶它。
25:51
XX quam vana igitur, immo desperata argumentatio eorum, qui sine dubio tergiversatione amittendae voluptatis optendunt nullam eius abstinentiae mentionem specialiter vel localiter in scripturis determinari, quae directo prohibeat eiusmodi conventibus inseri servum dei. novam proxime defensionem suaviludii cuiusdam audivi. sol, inquit, immo ipse etiam deus de caelo spectat nec contaminatur. sane, sol et in cloacam radios suos defert nec inquinatur. utinam autem deus nulla flagitia hominum spectaret, ut omnes iudicium evaderemus. sed spectat et latrocinia, spectat et falsa et adulteria et fraudes et idololatrias et spectacula ipsa.
How vain, indeed how desperate, is the argument of those who, out of an unmistakable reluctance to give up their pleasure, pretend that no mention of such abstinence is anywhere specified in the Scriptures, either by subject or by place, so as directly to forbid the servant of God to take part in gatherings of this kind. Lately I heard a novel defence of some pretty little sport. 'The sun,' says the man, 'nay, God himself, looks down from heaven and is not defiled.' To be sure: the sun casts its rays even into a sewer and is not befouled. But would to God that he looked upon none of men's outrages, so that we might all escape judgement! But he looks upon robberies too, he looks upon lies and adulteries and frauds and idolatries, and upon the very shows themselves.
那些人的論證何等虛妄,甚至可說是絕望的!他們分明是不願捨棄自己的享樂,於是狡辯說:聖經裏無論按主題或按地點,都沒有特別指明要人如此戒避,直接禁止神的僕人加入這類聚會。近來我聽到有人為某種花俏的遊戲提出一種新奇的辯護。他說:「太陽,不,就連神自己也從天上觀看,卻不受玷污。」不錯,太陽把光線射進陰溝,也不被汙穢。但但願神從不觀看人的種種惡行,好叫我們都能逃過審判!可是他也觀看搶劫,也觀看虛謊、姦淫、詐欺、拜偶像,並觀看這些戲劇表演本身。
25:52
et idcirco ergo nos non spectabimus, ne videamur ab illo, qui spectat omnia. comparas, homo, reum et iudicem, reum, qui, quia videtur, reus est, iudicem, qui, quia videt, iudex est. numquid ergo et extra limites circi furori studemus et extra cardines theatri impudicitiae intendimus et insolentiae extra stadium et immisericordiae extra amphitheatrum, quoniam deus etiam extra cameras et gradus et apulias oculos habet? erramus: nusquam et numquam excusatur quod deus damnat, nusquam et numquam licet quod semper et ubique non licet. haec est veritatis integritas et, quae ei debetur, disciplinae plenitudo et aequalitas timoris et fides obsequii, non inmutare sententiam nec variare iudicium.
And therefore, then, shall we not look on, lest we be seen by him who looks on all things? You compare, O man, the accused and the judge: the accused, who is accused because he is seen; the judge, who is judge because he sees. Do we then give ourselves to frenzy only beyond the bounds of the circus, and aim at lewdness only beyond the doors of the theatre, and to insolence only beyond the racecourse, and to mercilessness only beyond the amphitheatre, seeing that God has eyes even beyond the vaults and tiers and awnings? We are mistaken: nowhere and never is that excused which God condemns; nowhere and never is that lawful which is always and everywhere unlawful. This is the integrity of the truth, and the fullness of discipline that is owed to it, and the constancy of fear, and the fidelity of obedience: not to change one's verdict nor to vary one's judgement.
那麼,難道我們就因此不去觀看,免得被那位觀看萬物的主看見嗎?人哪,你竟把被告與審判者相比:被告之所以是被告,是因為他被人看見;審判者之所以是審判者,是因為他觀看。難道我們只在競技場的界限之外才縱情狂熱,只在劇場的門外才貪圖淫穢,只在跑道之外才放肆無禮,只在鬥獸場之外才心懷殘忍,彷彿神只在拱頂、階梯與遮棚之外才有眼睛嗎?我們錯了:凡神所定罪的,無論何處何時都不得推諉;凡在任何時地都不合法的,無論何處何時都不合法。這就是真理的完整,是真理所應得的訓誨之豐滿,是敬畏之堅定,是順服之忠信:不更改自己的判詞,也不變動自己的裁決。
25:53
non potest aliud esse, quod vere quidem est bonum seu malum. omnia autem penes veritatem dei fixa sunt. XXI ethnici, quos penes nulla est veritatis plenitudo, quia nec doctor veritatis deus, malum et bonum pro arbitrio et libidine interpretantur: alibi bonum quod alibi malum, et alibi malum quod alibi bonum.
That cannot be one thing here and another there which is truly good or evil. All things are fixed and settled with the truth of God. The heathen, who have no fullness of the truth in their keeping—since neither is God their teacher of truth—interpret evil and good according to their own caprice and lust: what is good in one place is elsewhere evil, and what is evil in one place is elsewhere good.
凡真正為善或為惡的事物,不能在此處是一樣、在彼處又是另一樣。萬事都在神的真理裏被確定不移。外邦人手中並沒有真理的豐滿——因為神並不是他們真理的教師——他們便按自己的任意與私慾來解釋善與惡:在此處為善的,在別處卻為惡;在此處為惡的,在別處反倒為善。
25:54
sic ergo evenit, ut, qui in publico vix necessitate vesicae tunicam levet, idem in circo aliter non exuat, nisi totum pudorem in faciem omnium intentet, ut et qui filiae virginis ab omni spurco verbo aures tuetur, ipse eam in theatrum ad illas voces gesticulationesque deducat, et qui in plateis litem manu agentem aut compescit aut detestatur, idem in stadio gravioribus pugnis suffragium ferat, et qui ad cadaver hominis communi lege defuncti exhorret, idem in amphitheatro derosa et dissipata et in suo sanguine squalentia corpora patientissimis oculis desuper incumbat, immo qui propter homicidae poenam probandam ad spectaculum veniat, idem gladiatorem ad homicidium flagellis et virgis compellat invitum, et qui insigniori cuique homicidae leonem poscit, idem gladiatori atroci petat rudem et pilleum praemium conferat, illum vero confectum etiam oris spectaculo repetat, libentius recognoscens de proximo quem voluit occidere de longinquo, tanto durior, si non voluit.
Thus, then, it comes about that a man who in public would scarcely lift his tunic even under the pressing need of his bladder, that same man in the circus will bare himself no otherwise than by flinging all his shame into the face of everyone; and that a man who guards his virgin daughter's ears from every filthy word, that same man will himself lead her into the theatre to those cries and gesticulations; and that a man who in the streets either checks or curses a brawl carried on by fist, that same man in the stadium will cast his vote for still fiercer blows; and that a man who shudders at the corpse of one dead by the common law of nature, that same man in the amphitheatre will bend down from above with most patient eyes upon bodies gnawed and torn and befouled in their own blood; nay, a man who comes to the show to attest his approval of the punishment of a murderer, that same man will drive the reluctant gladiator to murder with lashes and rods; and a man who demands the lion for every notorious murderer, that same man will beg the wooden sword for a savage gladiator and confer on him the cap of freedom as a reward, while the slain one he will demand back again even for a spectacle of his face, gazing more gladly close at hand upon one he wished to kill from afar—so much the harder if he did not wish it.
於是就出現這樣的情形:一個人在公共場合即便迫於膀胱之急也幾乎不肯掀起自己的短袍,這同一個人在競技場裏卻毫不遮掩,竟把一切羞恥拋在眾人面前;一個人守護處女女兒的耳朵不聽任何汙穢言語,這同一個人卻親自帶她進劇場去聽那些叫喊與看那些淫褻的手勢;一個人在街上見人揮拳鬥毆便加以制止或咒罵,這同一個人在競技場裏卻為更兇猛的拳擊投票喝采;一個人見到按自然常律而死之人的屍體便戰慄不已,這同一個人在鬥獸場裏卻以極其耐心的眼睛,從高處俯視那些被撕咬、被扯裂、浸在自己血中汙穢不堪的軀體;不僅如此,一個人來看戲,是為表示贊同對兇手的懲罰,這同一個人卻用鞭子與棍棒逼迫不情願的角鬥士去殺人;一個人為每個惡名昭彰的兇手索要獅子,這同一個人卻為兇殘的角鬥士懇求木劍,並把自由之帽當作獎賞賜給他,而對那被殺者,他甚至要求把面容重新展示出來,好在近處更歡喜地凝視那他遠遠地想殺死的人——若他本不願其死,那就更加殘忍了。
25:55
XXII quid mirum? inaequata ista hominum miscentium et commutantium statum boni et mali per inconstantiam sensus et iudicii varietatem. etenim ipsi auctores et administratores spectaculorum quadrigarios scaenicos xysticos arenarios illos amatissimos, quibus viri animas, feminae autem illis etiam corpora sua substernunt, propter quos se in ea committunt quae reprehendunt, ex eadem arte, qua magnifaciunt, deponunt et deminuunt, immo manifeste damnant ignominia et capitis minutione, arcentes curia rostris senatu equite ceterisque honoribus omnibus simul et ornamentis quibusdam. quanta perversitas! amant quos multant, depretiant quos probant, artem magnificant, artificem notant.
What wonder? These are the inconsistencies of men who confuse and interchange the state of good and evil through inconstancy of feeling and variety of judgement. For the very authors and managers of the shows set those charioteers, actors, athletes, and gladiators—their best beloved, to whom men subject their souls and women even their bodies, for whose sake they commit themselves to the very things they blame—they set them, by the same art through which they magnify them, down low, and degrade them; nay, they openly condemn them with disgrace and loss of civil standing, barring them from the senate-house, the rostrum, the senate, the equestrian order, and all other honours together with certain marks of distinction. What great perversity! They love those whom they penalize, they debase those whom they approve; they magnify the art, they brand the artist.
這有什麼奇怪呢?這些都是那些人的自相矛盾——他們因感情的反覆與判斷的不定,混淆並顛倒了善惡的本相。因為就連戲劇表演的主辦者與經營者,也把那些駕車手、演員、健身鬥士、競技場鬥士——他們最寵愛的人,男人為他們獻上靈魂,女人甚至獻上身體,為他們的緣故竟投身於自己所指責的事——把這些人用他們藉以吹捧的同一技藝加以貶抑、羞辱;不僅如此,還公然以恥辱和褫奪公民身分來定他們的罪,禁止他們進入元老院、講壇、參議、騎士階級,以及一切其他榮譽和某些榮飾。何等的乖謬!他們愛自己所懲罰的人,貶低自己所贊許的人;他們吹捧那技藝,卻烙印那技師。
25:56
quale iudicium est, ut ob ea quis offuscetur, per quae promeretur? immo quanta confessio est malae rei! cuius auctores, cum acceptissimi sint, sine nota non sunt. XXIII cum igitur humana recordatio etiam obstrepente gratia voluptatis damnandos eos censeat ademtis bonis dignitatum in quendam scopulum famositatis, quanto magis divina iustitia in eiusmodi artifices animadvertit? an deo placebit auriga ille tot animarum inquietator, tot furiarum minister +tot statuum+, ut sacerdos coronatus vel coloratus ut leno, quem curru rapiendum diabolus adversus Elian exornavit?
What kind of judgement is it, that a man should be disgraced for the very things by which he earns favour? Nay, how great a confession it is of an evil business, when its authors, even while they are most welcomed, are not without a brand of infamy! Since, then, human recollection—even against the clamour of the pleasure's charm—decrees that such men be condemned, stripping them of the goods of rank and casting them upon a certain rock of ill-fame, how much more does divine justice take note of such craftsmen? Or will that charioteer please God, the disquieter of so many souls, the minister of so many furies, of so many states of mind, crowned like a priest or painted like a pander, whom the devil has decked out to be swept along in his chariot against Elijah?
這算是什麼判斷呢?竟叫人因自己藉以博得歡心的事而蒙羞?不僅如此,這對這罪惡行當是何等的一種招認!其主事之人縱然最受歡迎,卻仍帶著恥辱的烙印!那麼,既然連人的常情——即便在享樂魅力的喧嚷之下——也判定要定這等人的罪,剝奪他們地位的好處,把他們拋在惡名的某塊岩石上,那麼神的公義又豈不更要察看這等匠人呢?難道那駕車手能討神喜悅嗎?他攪擾了那麼多靈魂,充當那麼多狂亂與那麼多心緒的差役,或戴著冠冕如祭司,或塗抹粉黛如淫媒,被魔鬼裝扮起來,好乘車奔馳,去對抗以利亞。
25:57
placebit et ille, qui voltus suos novacula mutat, infidelis erga faciem suam, quam non contentus Saturno et Isidi et Libero proximam facere insuper contumeliis alaparum sic obicit, tamquam de praecepto domini ludat? docet scilicet et diabolus verberandam maxillam patienter offerre. sic et tragoedos cothurnis extulit, quia "nemo potest adicere cubitum unum ad staturam suam": mendacem facere vult Christum. iam vero ipsum opus personarum quaero an deo placeat, qui omnem similitudinem vetat fieri, quanto magis imaginis suae? non amat falsum auctor veritatis; adulterium est apud illum omne quod fingitur.
And will that man please God who changes his own countenance with a razor, unfaithful to his own face, which, not content to make it resemble Saturn and Isis and Liber, he further exposes to the insults of blows, as though he were making sport of the Lord's precept? For indeed the devil too teaches men to offer the smitten cheek patiently. So too he has raised the tragedians high on their buskins, because 'no one can add one cubit to his stature': he wants to make Christ a liar. And now indeed I ask whether the very use of masks can please God, who forbids every likeness to be made—how much more the likeness of his own image? The author of truth does not love the false; with him everything that is feigned is adultery.
那用剃刀改變自己容貌的人,能討神喜悅嗎?他對自己的面容不忠——那面容他不滿足於使它像撒圖恩、伊西斯與利柏耳,還進一步使它遭受掌摑的侮辱,彷彿在嘲弄主的訓誨。因為連魔鬼也教人耐心地把被打的臉頰送上。他又照樣把悲劇演員高高抬在厚底靴上,因為「沒有人能使自己的身量多加一肘」:他要使基督成為說謊者。如今我還要問:面具本身的使用,豈能討那禁止製造一切肖像之神的喜悅呢——何況是他自己形像的肖像?真理的創始者不愛虛假;在他看來,凡是假造的都是姦淫。
25:58
proinde vocem sexus aetates mentientem, amores iras gemitus lacrimas asseverantem non probabit: omnem enim hypocrisin damnat. ceterum cum in lege praescribit maledictum esse qui muliebribus vestietur, quid de pantomimo iudicabit, qui etiam muliebribus curatur? sane et ille artifex pugnorum impunitus ibit? tales enim cicatrices caestuum et callos pugnorum et aurium fungos a deo cum plasmaretur accepit; ideo illi oculos deus commodavit, ut vapulando deficiant. taceo de illo, qui hominem leoni prae se opponit, ne parum sit homicida quam qui eundem postmodum iugulat.
Accordingly, a voice that counterfeits sex and ages, that asserts loves, angers, groans, and tears, he will not approve: for he condemns all hypocrisy. And besides, when in the Law he prescribes that a man who is clothed in women's garments is accursed, what will he judge of the pantomime, who is even trained up in womanly ways? Surely too shall that craftsman of fisticuffs go unpunished? For such scars from the gauntlets, and such callouses of the fists, and such fungus-swollen ears he received from God when he was fashioned; for this end God furnished him with eyes—that they might fail him under the beating! I say nothing of him who sets a man before a lion, that he may be no less a murderer than the one who afterwards cuts that same man's throat.
照樣,那模仿性別與年齡、假裝愛戀、憤怒、呻吟與眼淚的聲音,神也不會嘉許,因為他定一切偽善的罪。此外,律法中既規定穿女人衣服的男子是可咒詛的,那麼對於那甚至被訓練成女子模樣的啞劇演員,神又要如何判斷呢?難道那拳鬥的匠人真能免罰嗎?因為那些皮手套所致的傷疤、拳擊所生的硬繭、腫脹如菌的耳朵,都是他受造時從神所領受的肢體;神給他眼睛,正是為此——好叫它們在挨打中失明!至於那把人推到獅子面前的人,我就不說了,他無非要跟後來割那人喉嚨的人一樣,同為兇手。
25:59
XXIV quot adhuc modis perorabimus, nihil ex his quae spectaculis deputantur placitum deo esse aut congruens servo dei quod deo placitum non sit? si omnia propter diabolum instituta et ex diaboli rebus instructa monstravimus (nihil enim non diaboli est quicquid dei non est vel deo displicet), hoc erit pompa diaboli, adversus quem in signaculo fidei eieramus. quod autem eieramus, neque facto neque dicto neque visu neque prospectu participare debemus. ceterum nonne eieramus et rescindimus signaculum rescindendo testationem eius? numquid ergo superest, ut ab ipsis ethnicis responsum flagitemus? illi nobis iam renuntient, an liceat Christianis spectaculo uti.
In how many ways still shall we plead our case, that none of the things reckoned to the shows is pleasing to God, or fitting for the servant of God, seeing it is not pleasing to God? If we have shown that all things were established for the devil's sake and furnished out of the devil's stores—for whatever is not God's, or displeases God, is nothing other than the devil's—this will be the pomp of the devil, against which we renounce in the seal of faith. And what we renounce, we ought not to share in, neither by deed nor by word nor by sight nor by expectation. But do we not renounce and rescind our seal, by rescinding our testimony of it? Does it then remain that we should demand the answer from the very heathen? Let them now declare to us whether it be lawful for Christians to attend a show.
我們還要用多少種方式來申辯:凡歸於這些戲劇表演之事,既然不討神喜悅,就沒有一樣是討神喜悅、或適合於神的僕人的?我們既已證明萬事都是為魔鬼而設、由魔鬼的資材所配備的——因為凡不屬神、或使神不悅的,無非就是屬魔鬼的——那麼這就是魔鬼的排場,就是我們在信德的印記中所棄絕的。凡我們所棄絕的,我們就不當有分於它,無論以行為、言語、觀看,或期盼。否則,我們豈不是廢棄了對它的見證,也就廢棄並撤消了自己的印記嗎?那麼豈不剩下一途,就是要向外邦人本身索取回答嗎?就讓他們如今向我們宣告:基督徒觀看戲劇是否合法。
25:60
atquin hinc vel maxime intelligunt factum Christianum, de repudio spectaculorum. itaque negat manifeste qui per quod agnoscitur tollit. quid autem spei superest in eiusmodi homine? nemo in castra hostium transit nisi proiectis armis suis, nisi destitutis signis et sacramentis principis sui, nisi pactus simul perire. XXV an ille recogitabit eo tempore de deo positus illic ubi nihil est de deo? pacem, opinor, habebit in animo contendens pro auriga, pudicitiam ediscet attonitus in mimos. immo in omni spectaculo nullum magis scandalum occurret quam ille ipse mulierum et virorum accuratior cultus.
And indeed it is from this above all that they recognize a man to have become a Christian—from his repudiation of the shows. So a man plainly denies his profession when he does away with that by which he is recognized. And what hope is left in such a man? No one deserts to the enemy's camp except by throwing away his own arms, except by forsaking the standards and oaths of his own commander, except by covenanting to perish along with them. Or will he at that time give any thought to God, set there where there is nothing of God? Peace of mind, I suppose, he will have, while he strives on behalf of a charioteer; he will learn chastity, spellbound at the mimes! Nay, in every show no scandal will meet him more than that very over-careful adornment of the women and of the men.
確實,人們正是從這一點——從一個人棄絕戲劇表演——最能認出他已成為基督徒。所以,人若除去那使自己被人認出的憑據,就是明明地否認自己的信仰。這樣的人還有什麼盼望呢?沒有人投奔敵營,除非拋下自己的兵器,除非離棄自己統帥的旗幟與誓言,除非立約與他們一同滅亡。或者他在那時候還會顧念神嗎——身處那毫無神之蹤跡之地?我想,他倒會心裏平安,一面為某駕車手奮力吶喊;他倒會學得貞潔,一面被啞劇迷得神魂顛倒!不僅如此,在每一場表演中,沒有什麼比那些男女過分精心的妝扮更能絆倒他了。
25:61
ipsa consensio, ipsa in favoribus aut conspiratio aut dissensio inter se de commercio scintillas libidinum conflabellant. nemo denique in spectaculo ineundo prius cogitat nisi videri et videre. sed tragoedo vociferante exclamationes ille alicuius prophetae retractabit et inter effeminati tibicinis modos psalmum secum comminiscetur, et cum athletae agent, ille dicturus est repercutiendum non esse. poterit ergo et de misericordia moneri defixus in morsus ursorum et spongias retiariorum. avertat deus a suis tantam voluptatis exitiosae cupiditatem! quale est enim de ecclesia dei in diaboli ecclesiam tendere, de caelo, quod aiunt, in caenum?
That very agreement of taste, that conspiring or dissension among themselves in their favouritism, fans into flame the sparks of lust by the traffic between them. In short, no one goes to enter a show without first thinking of nothing but to see and to be seen. But while the tragedian is declaiming, that man will be turning over in his mind the exclamations of some prophet; and amid the strains of the effeminate flute-player he will inwardly compose a psalm to himself; and while the athletes are contending, he is the man to say that one must not strike back! He may then also be admonished about mercy, while fixed intent on the bites of bears and the sponges of the net-fighters! May God turn away from his own people so great a craving for pernicious pleasure! For what is it but to pass from the Church of God to the church of the devil, from heaven, as they say, into the mire?
正是那趣味的相投,正是他們在偏愛之中彼此的呼應或爭執,藉著彼此間的往來,把情慾的火花煽成火焰。總之,沒有人進場觀戲之先所想的,不外乎要看人與被人看。可是當悲劇演員高聲朗誦時,這人心裏卻在反覆思想某位先知的呼喊;在那陰柔笛手的曲調之間,他暗自為自己譜一首詩篇;當健鬥者角力時,他卻是那要說「人不可還手」的人!他也許還會在那裏受到憐憫的勸勉,卻眼睛緊盯著熊的撕咬和網鬥士的血汙海綿!願神使自己的子民遠離這對敗壞享樂如此強烈的貪求!因為這不外是從神的教會走進魔鬼的會堂,如他們所說,從天堂走進汙泥。
25:62
illas manus quas ad deum extuleris postmodum laudando histrionem fatigare? ex ore, quo Amen in Sanctum protuleris, gladiatori testimonium reddere, EIS AINÔNAS AP' AINÔNOS alii omnino dicere nisi deo et Christo? XXVI Cur ergo non eiusmodi etiam daemoniis penetrabiles fiant? Nam et exemplum accidit domino teste eius mulieris, quae theatrum adiit, et inde cum daemonio rediit. itaque in exorcismo cum oneraretur immundus spiritus, quod ausus esset fidelem aggredi, constanter: "et iustissime quidem" inquit "feci:
Shall you weary those very hands, which you have lifted up to God, afterwards in applauding an actor? Out of that mouth by which you have uttered Amen upon the Holy Thing, shall you bear witness to a gladiator, and say 'unto the ages, from age to age' to any one at all except to God and Christ? Why then should men not become penetrable even to demons of this kind? For an example did indeed occur, with the Lord as witness of that woman who went to the theatre and returned thence with a demon. And so in the exorcism, when the unclean spirit was pressed, because he had dared to assail a believer, he said steadfastly: 'And most justly indeed have I done it:
你既向神舉起雙手,難道之後要用它們鼓掌喝采一名戲子而累壞它們嗎?你既用口向聖物宣告「阿們」,難道要用同一張口向角鬥士作見證,並對神與基督以外的任何人說「直到永永遠遠」嗎?那麼,人為何不該連對這等鬼魔也變得可被侵入呢?因為確曾發生過一個例子,有主作見證:那婦人去了劇場,回來時竟帶著一個鬼。於是在驅鬼時,那汙穢的靈受了逼迫,因它竟敢侵犯一個信徒,它便堅定地說:「我這樣做實在是最公正不過的:
25:63
in meo eam inveni." constat et alii linteum in somnis ostensum eius diei nocte, qua tragoedum audierat, cum exprobratione nominato tragoedo nec ultra quintum diem eam mulierem in saeculo fuisse. quot utique et alia documenta cesserunt de his qui cum diabolo apud spectacula communicando a domino exciderunt. "nemo enim potest duobus dominis servire." "quid luci cum tenebris? quid vitae et morti?" XXVII odisse debemus istos conventus et coetus ethnicorum, vel quod illic nomen dei blasphematur, illic in nos quotidiani leones expostulantur, inde persecutiones decernuntur, inde temptationes emittuntur. quid facies in illo suffragiorum impiorum aestuario reprehensus?
for I found her on my own ground.' It is well attested too that to another woman a linen cloth was shown in a dream on the night of that same day on which she had listened to a tragic actor, the tragedian being named with reproach, and that this woman was not in the world beyond the fifth day. How many other proofs assuredly have come forth concerning those who by fellowshipping with the devil at the shows have fallen away from the Lord! For 'no one can serve two masters.' 'What has light to do with darkness? What has life with death?' We ought to hate these gatherings and assemblies of the heathen, if only because there the name of God is blasphemed, there the daily lions are demanded against us, thence persecutions are decreed, thence temptations are sent forth. What will you do, caught in that seething tide of impious clamours?
因為我是在自己的地界上找到她的。」還有確鑿的見證:另一個婦人,在她聽過一名悲劇演員的那一天夜裏,夢中被人指示一塊麻布,並帶著責備提到那悲劇演員的名字,而這婦人過了第五天便不在人世了。關於那些因在戲劇表演中與魔鬼相交而從主墮落之人,還確實出現過多少別的憑證!因為「一個人不能事奉兩個主。」「光明與黑暗有何相干?生命與死亡有何相干?」我們理當恨惡外邦人這些聚集與集會,單就這一點也夠了:在那裏神的名被褻瀆,在那裏天天有人索要獅子來對付我們,逼迫從那裏被裁定,試探從那裏被發出。當你被捲進那沸騰的褻瀆吶喊的浪潮中,你要怎麼辦呢?
25:64
non quasi aliquid illic pati possis ab hominibus (nemo te cognoscit Christianum), sed recogita, quid de te fiat in caelo. dubitas illo enim momento, quo diabolus in ecclesia furit, omnes angelos prospicere de caelo et singulos denotare, quis blasphemiam dixerit, quis audierit quis linguam, quis aures diabolo adversus deum ministraverit? non ergo fugies sedilia hostium Christi, illam cathedram pestilentiarum ipsumque aerem qui desuper incubat scelestis vocibus conspurcatum? sint dulcia licebit et grata et simplicia, etiam honesta quaedam. nemo venenum temperat felle et elleboro, sed conditis pulmentis et bene saporatis, et plurimum dulcibus id mali inicit.
Not as though you could suffer anything there at the hands of men—no one recognizes you as a Christian—but reflect on what becomes of you in heaven. Do you doubt that, in that very moment when the devil rages in the assembly, all the angels look forth from heaven and mark each one: who has uttered blasphemy, who has listened to it, whose tongue, whose ears he has lent to the devil against God? Will you not then flee the seats of Christ's enemies, that chair of pestilences, and the very air that hangs over them, befouled with wicked cries? Grant that they be sweet and pleasing and simple, even that some of them be honourable: no one tempers poison with gall and hellebore, but with well-seasoned and tasty morsels, and mostly with sweet ones, he introduces that bane.
這並非因為你在那裏會從人手中受什麼苦——沒有人認出你是基督徒——而是要思想你在天上要怎樣。當魔鬼在集會中肆虐的那一刻,難道你懷疑眾天使不都從天上俯視,逐一記下:誰說了褻瀆的話,誰聽了它,誰把舌頭、誰把耳朵借給魔鬼去攻擊神嗎?那麼你豈不該逃離基督仇敵的座位、那瘟疫之椅,以及那懸浮於其上、被邪惡叫喊所汙染的空氣嗎?就算它們甘甜、悅人、單純,甚至其中有些是可敬的:沒有人用膽汁和藜蘆來調毒藥,乃是用調味精良、鮮美可口、多半甜美的佳餚,把那毒害摻進去。
25:65
ita et diabolus letale quod conficit rebus dei gratissimis et acceptissimis imbuit. omnia illic seu fortia seu honesta seu sonora seu canora seu subtilia perinde habe ac stillicidia mellis de lucunculo venenato nec tanti gulam facias voluptatis quanti periculum per suavitatem. XXVIII saginentur eiusmodi dulcibus convivae sui: et loca et tempora et invitator ipsorum est. nostrae coenae, nostrae nuptiae nondum sunt. non possumus cum illis discumbere, quia nec illi nobiscum: vicibus disposita res est. nunc illi laetantur, nos conflictamur.
So too the devil steeps the deadly draught he brews in the things of God that are most pleasing and most acceptable. Whatever there is strong or honourable or sonorous or tuneful or subtle, regard it all just like drops of honey from a poisoned cake, and do not value your gullet's pleasure so highly as the peril that comes through the sweetness. Let his own guests be fattened on such sweets: to them belong the places and the times and the host himself. Our banquets, our nuptials, are not yet come. We cannot recline at table with them, because neither will they with us: the matter is arranged by turns. Now they rejoice, we are in conflict.
照樣,魔鬼把他所調製的致命之飲,浸潤在神的種種最悅人、最可喜的事物中。無論那裏有什麼剛健、可敬、宏亮、悅耳或精巧之物,你都要把它看作從毒糕上滴下的蜜,切莫看重口腹之樂,過於那藉甘甜而來的危險。就讓他自己的賓客飽享這等甜食吧:那些場所、時候與主人都是屬他們的。我們的筵席、我們的婚宴尚未來到。我們不能與他們同席,因為他們也不與我們同席:這事是輪流安排的。如今他們歡樂,我們爭戰。
25:66
"Saeculum" inquit "gaudebit, vos tristes eritis." lugeamus ergo, dum ethnici gaudent, ut, cum lugere coeperint, gaudeamus, ne pariter nunc gaudentes tunc quoque pariter lugeamus. delicatus es, Christiane, si et in saeculo voluptatem concupiscis, immo nimium stultus, si hoc existimas voluptatem. philosophi quidam hoc nomen quieti et tranquillitati dederunt, in ea gaudent, in ea avocantur, in ea etiam gloriantur. tu mihi metas et scaenam et pulverem et harenam suspiras? dicas velim: non possumus vivere sine voluptate, qui mori cum voluptate debemus? nam quod est aliud votum nostrum quam quod et apostoli, exire de saeculo et recipi apud dominum? Hic voluptas, ubi et votum.
'The world,' he says, 'shall rejoice, but you shall be sorrowful.' Let us then mourn while the heathen rejoice, so that, when they begin to mourn, we may rejoice; lest, rejoicing now alongside them, we should then also mourn alongside them. You are pampered, O Christian, if you crave pleasure even in this world—nay, exceedingly foolish, if you count this to be pleasure. Certain philosophers gave this name to quietude and tranquillity; in that they rejoice, in that they find their occupation, in that they even glory. Do you sigh to me for the turning-posts and the stage and the dust and the arena? Tell me, I pray: cannot we live without pleasure, we who must die with pleasure? For what else is our vow than that of the apostle also—to depart from the world and to be received with the Lord? Here is our pleasure, where also is our vow.
他說:「世界要歡喜,你們卻要憂愁。」那麼,就讓我們在外邦人歡樂時哀哭,好叫我們在他們開始哀哭時歡樂;免得如今與他們一同歡樂,將來也與他們一同哀哭。基督徒啊,你若連在這世上也貪求享樂,那你就是被寵壞了——不,若你把這算作享樂,你就是極其愚蠢了。有些哲學家把這名稱給了安寧與寧靜;他們以此為樂,以此為其專務,甚至以此為誇。你竟向我嘆息那轉彎柱、那戲臺、那塵土與那競技沙場嗎?我求你告訴我:我們既當歡然赴死,難道就不能無享樂而活嗎?因為我們的心願不外乎就是使徒的心願——離開世界,被主接納。我們的享樂就在此,我們的心願也在此。
25:67
XXIX iam nunc si putas delectamentis exigere spatium hoc, cur tam ingratus es, ut tot et tales voluptates a deo contributas tibi satis non habeas neque recognoscas? quid enim iucundius quam dei patris et domini reconciliatio, quam veritatis revelatio, quam errorum recognitio, quam tantorum retro criminum venia? quae maior voluptas quam fastidium ipsins voluptatis, quam saeculi totius contemptus, quam vera libertas, quam conscientia integra, quam vita sufficiens, quam mortis timor nullus, quod calcas deos nationum, quod daemonia expellis, quod medicinas facis, quod revelationes petis, quod deo vivis? haec voluptates, haec spectacula Christianorum sancta perpetua gratuita;
And now, if you think to pass this present span of time amid delights, why are you so ungrateful, that you neither have enough of, nor acknowledge, so many and such great pleasures bestowed on you by God? For what is more delightful than reconciliation with God the Father and Lord, than the revelation of the truth, than the recognition of one's errors, than the pardon of so many past crimes? What greater pleasure than disdain for pleasure itself, than contempt for the whole world, than true freedom, than an unstained conscience, than a life that suffices for itself, than no fear of death—that you tread underfoot the gods of the nations, that you drive out demons, that you work cures, that you seek revelations, that you live unto God? These are the pleasures, these the shows, of Christians—holy, perpetual, free of charge.
如今,你若以為要在種種歡娛中打發這段光陰,那你為何這樣忘恩,以致對神所賜給你那麼多、那麼大的享樂,既不知足,也不領情呢?還有什麼比與父神、與主和好更歡暢的呢?還有什麼比真理的啟示、比認清自己的錯謬、比赦免那麼多過往的罪愆更歡暢的呢?還有什麼更大的享樂,勝過鄙棄享樂本身、藐視整個世界、真正的自由、無瑕的良心、自給自足的生命、對死亡毫無懼怕呢——你踐踏列國的神明,你趕出鬼魔,你行醫治,你求啟示,你為神而活?這些就是基督徒的享樂,這些就是基督徒的戲劇——聖潔、永恆、不費分文。
25:68
in his tibi circenses ludos interpretare, cursus saeculi intuere, tempora labentia, spatia peracta dinumera, metas consummationis exspecta, societates ecclesiarum defende, ad signum dei suscitare, ad tubam angeli erigere, ad martyrii palmas gloriare. si scaenicae doctrinae delectant, satis nobis litterarum est, satis versuum est, satis sententiarum, satis etiam canticorum, satis vocum, nec fabulae, sed veritates, nec strophae, sed simplicitates. vis et pugilatus et luctatus? praesto sunt, non parva et multa.
In these interpret to yourself the games of the circus: gaze upon the racecourse of the world, count up the seasons gliding by, the spaces already run through, look for the goal-posts of the consummation, defend the fellowships of the churches, rouse yourself at God's signal, stand erect at the angel's trumpet, glory in the palms of martyrdom. If the teachings of the stage delight you, we have literature enough, verses enough, maxims enough, songs too enough, and voices enough—no fables, but truths; no artful twists, but plain sincerities. Do you want boxing-matches and wrestling too? They are at hand, and not small nor few.
在這些之中,你要把競技場的競賽這樣領會給自己:注視世界的跑道,數算那流逝的時節、那已經跑過的路程,等候那終局的界標,護衛眾教會的團契,在神的號令下奮起,在天使的號筒聲中挺立,以殉道的棕枝為誇。你若喜愛戲臺上的教訓,我們有足夠的文獻、足夠的詩篇、足夠的格言、也有足夠的頌歌與足夠的聲音——不是虛構的傳說,而是真理;不是巧妙的轉折,而是質樸的真誠。你也想要拳擊與角力嗎?它們就在眼前,且不小又不少。
25:69
aspice impudicitiam deiectam a castitate, perfidiam caesam a fide, saevitiam a misericordia contusam, petulantiam a modestia adumbratam, et tales sunt apud nos agones, in quibus ipsi coronamur. vis autem et sanguinis aliquid? Habes Christi. XXX quale autem spectaculum in proximo est adventus domini iam indubitati, iam superbi, iam triumphantis! quae illa exultatio angelorum, quae gloria resurgentium sanctorum! quale regnum exinde iustorum! qualis civitas nova Hierusalem! at enim supersunt alia spectacula, ille ultimus et perpetuus iudicii dies, ille nationibus insperatus, ille derisus, cum tanta saeculi vetustas et tot eius nativitates uno igni haurientur. quae tunc spectaculi latitudo!
Behold lewdness cast down by chastity, perfidy cut down by faith, cruelty crushed by mercy, wantonness thrown into shade by modesty—such are the contests among us, in which we ourselves are crowned. Do you want something of blood too? You have Christ's. But what a spectacle is already at hand—the coming of the Lord, now beyond all doubt, now exalted, now triumphant! What exultation that of the angels, what glory that of the saints rising again! What a kingdom thereafter of the righteous! What a city, the new Jerusalem! But indeed there remain yet other spectacles: that last and everlasting Day of Judgement, that day unlooked-for by the nations, that day derided, when so great an antiquity of the world, and all its births, shall be swallowed up in one fire. How vast then the sweep of the spectacle!
看哪,淫穢被貞潔擊倒,背信被信德砍伐,殘暴被憐憫粉碎,放縱被端莊掩蔽——這些就是我們中間的競賽,我們自己就在其中得冠冕。你也想要一點血嗎?你有基督的血。但已經在眼前的,是何等的一場盛景——主的降臨,如今已無可置疑,如今高舉,如今凱旋!眾天使的歡騰何等浩大,復活的眾聖徒的榮耀何等輝煌!此後義人的國度何等榮美!那新耶路撒冷的城何等壯麗!然而確實還剩下別的盛景:那末後、永存的審判之日,那列國意想不到之日,那被嗤笑之日——當世界如此悠久的年歲、它一切的世代,都要被一把火吞滅之時。到那時,這盛景的規模何等浩瀚!
25:70
quid admirer? quid rideam? ubi gaudeam, ubi exultem, tot spectans reges, qui in caelum recepti nuntiabantur, cum Iove ipso et ipsis suis testibus in imis tenebris congemescentes? item praesides persecutores dominici nominis saevioribus quam ipsi flammis saevierunt insultantes contra Christianos liquescentes? quos praeterea? sapientes illos philosophos coram discipulis suis una conflagrantibus erubescentes, quibus nihil ad deum pertinere suadebant, quibus animas aut nullas aut non in pristina corpora redituras adfirmabant? etiam poetas non ad Rhadamanthi nec ad Minonis, sed ad inopinati Christi tribunal palpitantes?
What shall I admire? At what shall I laugh? Where shall I rejoice, where exult—as I behold so many kings, who were announced to have been received into heaven, groaning together in the lowest darkness with Jove himself and with those their very witnesses? Likewise the governors, persecutors of the Lord's name, melting in flames fiercer than those with which they raged in their insolence against the Christians? And whom besides? Those wise philosophers, blushing before their disciples who blaze together with them—the disciples whom they used to persuade that nothing pertained to God, to whom they affirmed that souls were either nothing at all, or would not return into their former bodies? The poets too, trembling not before the tribunal of Rhadamanthus nor of Minos, but of the unexpected Christ?
我要驚嘆什麼?我要嘲笑什麼?我要在何處歡樂、在何處歡騰呢——當我看見那麼多君王,本被宣告已被接入天堂的,竟與朱庇特本身、與那些為他們作見證之人一同,在最幽深的黑暗裏一同哀號之時?照樣,那些總督、逼迫主之名的人,在比他們當年放肆地向基督徒發洩之火更兇猛的火焰中熔化之時?此外還有誰呢?那些智慧的哲學家,在與他們一同焚燒的門徒面前羞愧無地——那些門徒,他們曾勸他們相信萬事都與神無關,並向他們斷言:靈魂或全然虛無,或必不歸回原先的身體?還有那些詩人,戰慄發抖,卻不是站在拉達曼提斯或米諾斯的審判臺前,而是站在那意想不到的基督的審判臺前?
25:71
tunc magis tragoedi audiendi, magis scilicet vocales in sua propria calamitate; tunc histriones cognoscendi, solutiores multo per ignem; tunc spectandus auriga in flammea rota totus ruber; tunc xystici contemplandi, non in gymnasiis, sed in igne iaculati, nisi quod ne tunc quidem illos velim visos, ut qui malim ad eos potius conspectum insatiabilem conferre, qui in dominum desaevierunt. hic est ille, dicam, fabri aut quaestuariae filius, sabbati destructor, Samarites et daemonium habens; hic est quem a Iuda redemistis, hic est ille harundine et colaphis diverberatus, sputamentis dedecoratus, felle et aceto potatus;
Then the tragedians are more worth hearing, more vocal, no doubt, in their own proper calamity; then the actors are to be marked, far more supple through the fire; then the charioteer is to be gazed upon, all red on his flaming wheel; then the athletes are to be contemplated, hurled not in the gymnasia but into the fire—save that not even then would I wish them seen, as one who would rather turn upon those others an insatiable gaze: upon those who raged against the Lord. 'This is he,' I shall say, 'the son of a carpenter or a harlot, the Sabbath-breaker, the Samaritan who has a demon; this is he whom you bought from Judas; this is he, beaten with reed and fists, defiled with spittings, given gall and vinegar to drink;
那時悲劇演員更值得一聽,無疑在他們自己本身的災難中更加高聲;那時演員該被注視,在火中扭動得靈活得多;那時駕車手該被凝望,通身赤紅地在他那火焰的輪上;那時健鬥者該被細看,被拋擲——不是在健身房,而是在火裏——只是即便到那時,我也不願看見他們,因為我寧願把貪看不足的目光轉向那另一批人:那些曾向主發怒逞兇的人。「這就是那人,」我要說,「木匠或妓女的兒子,破壞安息日的人,那被鬼附的撒瑪利亞人;這就是你們從猶大手中買來的那位;這就是那被蘆葦與拳頭打過、被唾沫玷汙、被拿苦膽和醋給喝的人;
25:72
hic est, quem clam discentes subripuerunt, ut surrexisse dicatur, vel hortulanus detraxit, ne lactucae suae frequentia commeantium adlaederentur. ut talia spectes, ut talibus exultes, quis tibi praetor aut consul aut quaestor aut sacerdos de sua liberalitate praestabit? et tamen haec iam quodammodo habemus per fidem spiritu imaginante repraesentata. ceterum qualia illa sunt, quae nec oculus vidit nec auris audivit nec in cor hominis ascenderunt? credo, circo et utraque cavea et omni stadio gratiora.
this is he whom the disciples secretly stole away, that he might be said to have risen again—or whom the gardener dragged off, lest his lettuces should be trampled by the throng of comers.' To behold such things, to exult in such things—what praetor or consul or quaestor or priest will out of his own liberality furnish it to you? And yet these things we already in a manner possess through faith, presented to us by the imagining spirit. But of what sort are those things which neither eye has seen nor ear has heard nor have entered into the heart of man? I believe more delightful than the circus and both amphitheatres and every stadium.
這就是那被門徒暗中偷走的人,好叫人說他復活了——又或是被那園丁拖走的,免得他的萵苣被前來的人群踐踏。」要觀看這樣的事,要因這樣的事歡騰——哪位執政官、執政、財務官或祭司會出於自己的慷慨,把這些供給你呢?然而這些事,我們如今已藉信德在某種意義上擁有了,由那能想像的靈呈現在我們眼前。但那眼睛未曾看見、耳朵未曾聽見、人心也未曾想到的事,又是何等的呢?我相信必比競技場、比兩座鬥獸場、比一切運動場都更加令人歡暢。
← prev part
← ch. 24ch. 26 →
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435