內容伺服器目前離線,這是 2026-08-11 產生的離線快照;全文搜尋暫時無法使用。 The content server is offline; this is a 2026-08-11 snapshot. Full-text search is unavailable.
📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Tractates

Zeno of Verona

Tractates 1 part 7/14

Latin original · 39 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 1:221–1:259 (487 verses in all)

ch. 2 →
← prev partnext part →
1:221
Igltur primum omnium probandum puto, ani­ mas nostras suorum corporum exuviis, nec cum labe carnalis huju ce domicilii ista prima morte dissolvi; sed pro qualitate factorum quasdam locis pœnalibus relegari , quasdam placidis (8) sedibus refoveri : ut tunc demum credi possit resurgere, quod omnibus palam sit non penitus interire. 127 Gente, quæ ista non credunt, tamen cum (9) libamine infausto ad sepul­ cra concurrunt, et (10) a mortuis, qups in quiete laci­ noctis agnoverint, expeti a se aliquotiens alimenta contendunt: ac sic fidem rei, quam reprobant, fa- ciunt. (11) Philosophi de anima varia dixerunt:
Therefore I think it must first of all be proved that our souls are not dissolved with the spoils of their bodies, nor with the decay of this carnal dwelling, by that first death; but according to the quality of their deeds, some are banished to penal places, some are refreshed in placid abodes: so that it may at last be believed that that rises again which is plain to all does not utterly perish. The Gentile race, who do not believe these things, nevertheless rush to the sepulchers with ill-omened libation, and contend that they have sometimes had food sought from them by the dead whom they have recognized in the quiet of the silent night: and thus they bear witness to the reality of the thing which they reject. The philosophers have said various things concerning the soul:
因此我認為首先必須證明:我們的靈魂並不因那初次的死而與其身體的殘骸、或與這屬肉體之居所的朽壞一同消散;而是按其行為的性質,有些被放逐到刑罰之地,有些則在平靜的居所中得安息:如此,最終人便可相信,那在眾人眼前顯然並不全然消滅的,必要復活。外邦的族類,雖不信這些事,卻仍以不祥的奠祭奔赴墳墓,並堅稱有時他們在寂靜長夜的安寧中認出的死者,曾向他們索取食物:如此,他們便為自己所棄絕之事的真實性作了見證。哲學家們論到靈魂說了種種不同的話:
1:222
sed tamen hanc esse immortalem, (12) Epicuri, Dicæarchi, Democritique vanitatem argumentatione manifesta convincunt. (13) Poetae autem melius, qui duplicem viam apud iuferos ponunt: impiorum unam , 128 quaeducit in Tartarum : piorum (14) aliam, quæ ducit ad Elysium ; eo fortius addentes, quod defunctorum ibidem non tam formae, quarn facta noscantur, ac ne­ cessario recipiant, secundum quod mundanae admini. strationis suis in actibus portant, recte dicentes : (15) Quisque suos patimur manes. (Æneid., VI, v. 743.) III.
yet that it is immortal, they refute the vanity of Epicurus, Dicaearchus, and Democritus with manifest argumentation. But the poets did better, who place a twofold way among those below: one of the impious, which leads to Tartarus: another of the pious, which leads to Elysium; adding the more forcibly that there not so much the forms as the deeds of the dead are recognized, and that they necessarily receive according to what they bear in their acts of worldly administration—rightly saying: Each of us suffers his own shade (Aeneid VI, 743). III.
然而靈魂乃是不朽的,他們以明白的論證駁倒了伊壁鳩魯、狄凱阿庫斯和德謨克利特的虛妄。但詩人們作得更好,他們在陰間設定了雙重的路:一條是不敬虔者的路,引向塔耳塔洛斯;另一條是敬虔者的路,引向至福樂土;他們更有力地補充說,在那裡被認出的與其說是死者的形貌,不如說是他們的行為,並且他們必按自己在世間生涯的作為中所承擔的領受報應——他們說得對:我們各人都承受自己的亡魂(《埃涅阿斯紀》卷六743)。三、
1:223
Nos vero, fratres, quos non ingeniosa sospi­ do, sed Deus-magister instruxit, propter nos in semetipso probando, quod docuit, vivere animas mortuorum non tam dicere, quam oculatis rebus sufficimus approbare. Denique vagi atque immundi (16) spiritus utriusque sexus humani dolosa blandi­ tiarum captione, seu violentia viventium domos corporales infringunt, et latibulum sibi (17) perni­ ciosis eorum in capitavitatibus quærunt. At ubi ven­ tum fuerit ad divini certaminis campum, cœperint­ que sacri nominis telo pulsari; (18) tunc cum alinm noveris, alium certari misereris.
But we, brethren, whom not ingenious conjecture but God our Master has instructed, by proving in His own self, for our sake, what He taught, are able not so much to say as to prove by ocular facts that the souls of the dead live. In short, wandering and unclean spirits, by the crafty enticement of blandishments, or by violence, break into the bodily homes of living persons of both human sexes, and seek a lurking-place for themselves in their pernicious chief faculties. But when it has come to the field of the divine combat, and they begin to be struck with the dart of the sacred Name, then, since you know one, you pity another being made to do battle.
但弟兄們,我們既不是被巧妙的臆測、而是被神我們的師傅所教導——祂為我們的緣故,在祂自己身上證實了祂所教導的——我們便能與其說是用言語、不如說是用親眼所見的事實,來證明死者的靈魂是活著的。簡言之,遊蕩的污穢之靈,藉著諂媚的狡詐誘惑,或藉著暴力,闖入活著的兩性之人的身體居所,並在他們致命的諸般主要官能中為自己尋找藏身之處。但當這事臨到神聖爭戰的戰場,它們開始被聖名的標槍擊打時,那時,既然你認得一個人,你便會憐憫另一個被逼去爭戰的人。
1:224
Discoloratur per momenta color, 129 figura sua tollitur a natura, in obliquos horrores insani vertuntur orbes oculorum, acies dentium spumosis horrida globis inter labra liventia stridit, intorta omnia passim membra tre­ more vibrantur, gemit, flet : denuntiatum pavet judicii diem., pellique se plangit : (19) confitetur sexum, confitetur aggressurae tempus et locum, et nomen proprium confitetur, discessumque: vel qui sit, signis evidentibus docet, ut plerumque aliquos noscamus (20) eos esse, quos in idololatria commorantes nuper, vel maxime vi aliqua obiisse meminerimus.
The color is discolored from moment to moment, its proper figure is taken from nature, the orbs of the eyes are turned in slanting horrors of madness, the row of the teeth, bristling with foaming masses, gnashes between livid lips, all the limbs everywhere are made to vibrate with a twisted trembling, it groans, it weeps: it dreads the announced day of judgment, and bewails that it is being driven out: it confesses its sex, it confesses the time and place of its assault, and confesses its own name, and its departure: or who it may be, it shows by evident signs, so that for the most part we recognize them to be those whom we remember as having lately, or most of all by some violence, died while abiding in idolatry.
那氣色一刻一刻地變色,其本相從本性中被奪去,雙眼的眼珠轉成瘋狂的斜視恐怖,那一排牙齒,因泡沫成團而猙獰,在發青的雙唇間磨切,四肢遍體都被一種扭曲的戰慄搖動,它呻吟、它哭泣:它懼怕那被宣告的審判之日,並哀號自己正被趕出:它招認自己的性別,招認它侵襲的時間與地點,並招認自己的名字以及離去之時:或它究竟是誰,它以明顯的徵兆顯示出來,以致我們多半認出它們就是我們記得近來、尤其是因某種暴力而死、且死時仍滯留於拜偶像中的那些人。
1:225
(21) Hic nunc mihi responde, qui hominis poat mortem nihil superesse contendis, (22) quemadmodum per alium locutus .it mortuus ille, quem noveris? At dicis : Hæc dæmones fingunt. Eo probatio melior, quod etiam fallaces testimonium perhibent veritati. 130 (23) Cur autem fingant nomina, quorum est confessio in caeteris vera, aut qua ra­ tione isto argumento nitantur, quod hominibus, quos perditos cupiunt, magis proliciat ad Dei timorem, et ipsis nihil prosit ad utilitatem? Sane recte hoc fa­ cere existimarentur, si sub praetextu alieni nominis invasa obtinere potuissent. At cum divina adjura- tione in eculeo spiritali et qui sint nolentes edicant, et inviti discedant ;
Here now answer me, you who contend that nothing survives a man after death, how through another there spoke that dead man whom you knew? But you say: The demons feign these things. So much the better the proof, that even the deceitful bear witness to the truth. But why should they feign names, whose confession is true in other matters? or by what reason should they rely on this argument, which avails more, for the men whom they desire to be ruined, toward the fear of God, and profits themselves nothing toward their advantage? Indeed they would rightly be thought to do this, if under the pretext of another's name they had been able to keep what they had invaded. But since by divine adjuration on the spiritual rack they both declare unwillingly who they are, and depart against their will;
你這堅稱人死後一無存留的人哪,現在在這裡回答我:那你所認得的死者,怎能藉著另一個人說話呢?但你說:這些是鬼魔捏造的。這證據反倒更佳,因為連那詭詐者也為真理作見證。但它們既在別的事上招供是真實的,又何必捏造名字呢?或它們憑甚麼理由倚靠這一論點——這論點對它們所渴望毀滅的人更為有益,使人敬畏神,於它們自己卻毫無益處?誠然,若它們能在他人名義的幌子下保住所侵入之物,那麼它們這樣行才會被認為合理。但既然藉著神聖的咒誓、在屬靈的刑架上,它們既不情願地說出自己是誰,又違心地離去;
1:226
procul dubio hoc sunt, quod sese esse unicuique confitentur. IV. Accipe et alia exempla et quidem certiora. Primo in (24) libro verborum Samuel egregius ille (25) sacerdos mortis jam lege dispunctus, Sauli regi se desideranti sine ambiguitate non tantum Suam (26) præsentiam exhibet, sed etiam .ad consulta re­ spondet (1Reg. XXVIII), liberiusque 131 canit mortuus, quam cancre cousucverat vivus; unde libet excla­ mare : (27) Profectus potius est iste, quam mortuus. In Evangelio quoque Petrus filiique Zebedæi cum Domino adstare fulgentes Moysen Eliamque (Matth.
without doubt they are that which they confess themselves to be to each one. IV. Receive also other examples, and indeed more certain ones. First, in the book of the words of Samuel, that distinguished priest, already discharged by the law of death, exhibits to King Saul, who desired him, without ambiguity not only his own presence, but also responds to the matters consulted (1 Sam. 28), and the dead man chants more freely than he had been wont to chant alive; whence one may well exclaim: That man has rather set forth on a journey than died. In the Gospel also Peter and the sons of Zebedee, when the Lord stood by shining, saw Moses and Elijah (Matt. 17),
毫無疑問,它們正是它們向各人所招認自己所是的那樣。四、再領受別的例證,而且是更確切的例證。首先,在撒母耳言行錄中,那位卓越的祭司,雖已按死亡的律例離世,卻向那渴慕他的掃羅王,毫不含糊地不僅顯出他自己的同在,並且還回應所詢問的事(撒上二十八),這死者比他活著時慣常所宣告的更為自如地宣告;因此人大可呼喊說:那人與其說是死了,不如說是踏上了旅程。在福音書中,彼得和西庇太的兒子們,當主發光站在那裡時,看見了摩西和以利亞(太十七),
1:227
XVII), quos (28) propter tunc impedimentum carnis videre non possent, libertate spiritus vident, exinde intelligentes in (29) thesauro naturæ depositum in­ colume requiescere, quod in hoc mundo ad tempus perspicitur inlerire. Similiter in inferno dives ille tenacissimus, quein chaos immensum a pauperis fe­ licitate discernit (ldem c. XVI), ardoribus suis im­ plorando refrigerium, Lazarum verum divitem sero cegnoscit , cupitque mortuus vel uno digito illis contingi manibus, quibus stipem denegaverat vivus. Odit jam sine causa ante quod amaveat : probat felicius esse, quod odcrat.
whom on account of the then impediment of the flesh they could not have seen, they see by the liberty of the spirit, thence understanding that what is deposited in the treasury of nature rests unharmed, which in this world is for a time perceived to perish. Likewise in hell that most tenacious rich man, whom a vast chaos separates from the poor man's felicity (the same, ch. 16), imploring with his burnings a refreshment, recognizes too late Lazarus the true rich man, and the dead man desires to be touched even by one finger of those hands to which the living man had denied an alms. Now without cause he hates what he had loved before: he proves that to be more blessed which he had hated.
他們因當時肉體的攔阻本不能看見,卻藉著靈的自由看見了他們,由此明白:那存放在自然寶庫中的,原封不動地安息著,雖然在這世上它暫時看似消逝。同樣,在陰間,那極其慳吝的財主,有一道巨大的深淵把他與那窮人的福樂隔開(同上,第十六章),他在自己的火焰中懇求一點清涼,遲遲才認出拉撒路才是真正的財主,這死了的財主渴望被那雙手中的一根指頭沾一沾,就是他活著時曾拒絕施捨的那雙手。如今他無緣無故地恨惡他從前所愛的:他證實了他從前所恨惡的,原是更為有福的。
1:228
(30) Gemit instanti poenæ aliquid de facultatibus notis mederi non posse, prb uno puncto requiei incunctanter tota, si liceat, pa­ ratus offerre. Superstitibus fratribus saltem cupit esse consultum. Abraham patrem deprecatur obnixe, ut aliquis nuntius pergat, qui eos tanti negotii certos efficiat, 132 cui ille respondit : Habent Moysen et pro­ phetas, quibus si non credunt, neque illi, qui hinc mis­ sus fuerit, credituri sunt (Luc. XVI, 29, 31), eviden­ ter ostendens, non in oculis esse carnalibus verum, sed in fide credentium constitutum. V. Nam et Dominus ista exempla confirmans uni ex latronibus in se credenli, qui (51) cum eo de pa­ tibulo dextra laevaque pendebant, ait :
He groans that nothing of his known faculties can remedy the imminent punishment, ready without hesitation to offer all, if it were permitted, for one moment's respite. He desires that at least his surviving brothers be consulted for. He earnestly beseeches father Abraham that some messenger may go, who may make them certain of so great a matter; to whom he answered: They have Moses and the prophets; if they believe not them, neither will they believe him who shall be sent hence (Luke 16:29, 31), evidently showing that the truth is not in carnal eyes, but is established in the faith of believers. V. For the Lord also, confirming these examples, said to one of the thieves believing in Him, who were hanging on the gibbet with Him on the right and left:
他呻吟著,因他所知道的一切資財都不能醫治那臨近的刑罰,他甘願毫不遲疑地獻上一切——只要蒙允許——換取片刻的歇息。他渴望至少為他尚存的弟兄們設想周全。他懇切哀求亞伯拉罕父,求他打發一個報信的去,使他們確知這等大事;亞伯拉罕回答他說:他們有摩西和先知的話可以聽從;他們若不聽從摩西和先知的話,就是有一個從這裡差去的,他們也是不信服(路十六29、31),這明顯顯示:真理不在屬肉體的眼睛裡,乃是建立在信徒的信德之中。五、因為主也證實這些例證,對那與祂一同懸在十字架上、在祂左右、信祂的一個強盜說:
1:229
Amen amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso (Luc. XXXIII, 43). Itaque si homo mortuus in æternum perit, ergo mentitus est Dominus, qui ei deinceps nihil futuro paradisum repromisit. Sed et homo ipse, quem Do­ minus adsumpserat, perit, si Jesus non resurrexerit. At si resurrexit, humano generi formam dedit, quo- niam ad hoc Deus pro homine mortis jura gustavit , ut homo per Deum jus immortalitatis reciperet, quod amisit. Propter quod Paulus beatissimus ait : No­ lumus autem ignorare vos , fratres, de dormientibus , ne contristemini, sicut cæteri qui spem non habent :
Amen, amen, I say to thee, today thou shalt be with Me in paradise (Luke 23:43). Therefore if a dead man perishes forever, then the Lord lied, who promised paradise to him who henceforth would have no future. But the man himself also, whom the Lord had assumed, perishes, if Jesus has not risen. But if He has risen, He gave a model to the human race, since for this purpose God tasted the rights of death on man's behalf, that man through God might receive back the right of immortality which he had lost. Wherefore the most blessed Paul says: But we would not have you ignorant, brethren, concerning them that are asleep, that you be not sorrowful, even as the rest who have no hope:
我實實在在地告訴你,今日你要同我在樂園裡了(路二十三43)。所以,若死人永遠滅亡,那麼那向此後再無將來之人應許樂園的主,就是說了謊。但若耶穌沒有復活,那連主所取了的那人自己,也要滅亡。但若祂已復活,祂便給了人類一個典範,因為神為此緣故替人嚐了死亡的權勢,好叫人藉著神得回他所失去的不死之權。因此至有福的保羅說:弟兄們,論到睡了的人,我們不願意你們不知道,恐怕你們憂傷,像那些沒有指望的人一樣:
1:230
si enim credimus quia Jesus mortuus est , et resur­ rexit, sic et Deus eos , qui dormierunt in Jesum, ad­ ducet cum eo (I Thessal. IV, Ii, 13). Nam et Deus per Ezechielem prophetam loquitur, dicens : Ecce ego aperio monumenta vestra, et educam vos de monu­ mentis vestris. et inducam vos in terram Israel: dabo spiritum meum in vos, et vivetis (Ezech. XXXVII, 12 el seqq.). VI. Cum hæc ita sint, resurrectionem futuram cur, Christiane, non credis? Cur (32) de hujus mundi labe in meliora migrantes tam pertinaciter plangis Proh nefas!
for if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus (1 Thess. 4:13, 14). For God also speaks through the prophet Ezekiel, saying: Behold, I will open your graves, and will bring you out of your graves, and will bring you into the land of Israel: I will put My spirit in you, and you shall live (Ezek. 37:12 ff.). VI. Since these things are so, why, O Christian, do you not believe in the resurrection to come? Why do you so obstinately mourn those who migrate from the decay of this world into better things? O wickedness!
我們若信耶穌死了又復活了,照樣,神也必將那些在耶穌裡睡了的人與耶穌一同帶來(帖前四13、14)。因為神也藉著先知以西結說:看哪,我必開你們的墳墓,使你們從墳墓中出來,並引你們進入以色列地:我必將我的靈放在你們裡面,你們就要活了(結三十七12及以下)。六、既然這些事是如此,基督徒啊,你為何不信將來的復活呢?對於那些從這世界的朽壞遷往更美之事的人,你為何如此固執地哀悼呢?哦,何等的不敬之罪!
1:231
Hinc mater scissa veste , laniatis crinibus, laniatis et genis, totum crebris ictibus livida pectus, gentili vanitate circa amissi cadaver bacchatur in­ sana, nec Machabææ matris memoriam recolit, quæ spc succincta futurorum, Antiocho (33) sæviente, li­ benter semel septem filios , non dicam extulit, sed ipsa potius feliciter suis hortamentis occidit, reli­ giose confidens Deo filios se genuisse, non mundo ( I Mach. VII). Hinc uxor amissi mariti desolationem sc ferrc non posse testatur : frigidumque latus male dilatato queritur tecto; (34) invidiosis vocibus Dco concinnat invidiam;
Here the mother, her garment rent, her hair torn, her cheeks torn too, her whole breast livid with frequent blows, with heathen vanity raves madly around the corpse of the lost one, nor does she recall the memory of the Maccabean mother, who, girded with the hope of things to come, while Antiochus raged, gladly at one time—I will not say buried, but rather herself happily by her own exhortations slew—seven sons, religiously confident that she had begotten her sons for God, not for the world (2 Macc. 7). Here the wife testifies that she cannot bear the desolation of her lost husband: she complains of her cold side under the bed too widely spread; with envious cries she contrives envy against God;
在這裡,那母親撕裂衣裳,扯亂頭髮,連雙頰也抓破,整個胸膛因頻頻捶打而青腫,以異教的虛榮在喪失之人的屍體周圍瘋狂地哀號,卻不追念那馬加比母親的事蹟:她以將來之事的盼望束腰,當安提阿古暴虐之時,竟一次甘心——我不說埋葬了,倒不如說她自己以她的勉勵幸福地殺了——七個兒子,虔誠地深信她是為神、而非為世界生養了她的兒子(馬加比下七)。在這裡,那妻子作證說,她不能承受失去丈夫的淒涼:她抱怨那過於寬闊的床上自己一側的冰冷;她以嫉恨的呼喊向神羅織怨恨;
1:232
133 (35) solemnia ipsa divina, quibus a sacerdotihus Dei quiescentes commendari consueverunt, profanis aliquotiens ululatibus rumpit; tetraque illuvie suum totum deformans cultum, ca- daver amplectitur (36) conclamatum ; frigentia tepe- facit crebris osculis labra ; totum corpus imbribus. rclaval lacrymarum, crinium suorum damno coope­ riens; miserandis affatibus in uberiores fletus incen­ dit etiam eos, quos causa non tangit, tanto ambi­ tiosior in dolore, (37) quanto ditior, sane post mo­ mentum misera (atque utinam (38) semel) nimio do­ lore nuptura. Hic, hic quemadmodum se quis possit excusare non video ; non deest enim, qui dicere pos­ sit : Si est resurrectio, quare plangis ?
the very divine solemnities, by which the departed are wont to be commended by the priests of God, she sometimes breaks with profane howlings; and deforming her whole adornment with foul filth, she embraces the corpse over which the wailing has been made; with frequent kisses she warms the cold lips; she washes the whole body with showers of tears, covering it with the loss of her own hair; with pitiable addresses she kindles into more abundant weeping even those whom the cause does not touch, the more ostentatious in grief the richer she is—yet truly after a moment, miserable (and would that but once), through excessive grief about to marry again. Here, here I do not see how anyone could excuse herself; for there is not lacking one who could say: If there is a resurrection, why do you mourn?
那些原本由神的祭司用來薦舉安息者的神聖典禮,她有時竟以褻瀆的嚎哭打斷;她用污穢的塵土玷污她全身的妝飾,擁抱那已被哀號過的屍體;以頻頻的親吻溫暖那冰冷的雙唇;以淚雨洗滌整個身體,並以自己剪落的頭髮覆蓋它;以可憐的話語,連那些與此事無關的人也被她激起更豐沛的哭泣;她越富有,在悲痛中便越誇張——然而轉瞬之間,這可憐人(但願只此一次)卻因過度的悲傷將要再嫁。在這裡,在這裡,我看不出有誰能為自己辯解;因為不乏有人能說:若有復活,你為何哀悼呢?
1:233
si amore ma­ riti facis , cur postmodum nubis? exsecrabilis res est, fratres, nec conjugio servare charitatem, nec Deo fidem. Hæc etiam viros reprehensio manet. VII. Christianus ergo in toto dubitare non debet, in statum pristinum mortuos excitari : talesque legi­ tima die ante conspectum Dei ex illo naturæ (39) se- creto produci, quales fuerint pro sua quique quali­ tate suscepti, Apostolo dicente : Omnes nos mani­ festari oportet ante 134 tribunal Christi ; ut recipiat unusquisque corporis sui merita secundum ea quæ ges­ sit, sive bona , sive mala (II Cor. VI, 10). Etenim , fratres, facilius est (40) reformari quod fuerit, quam institui quod ante non fuit:
if you do it out of love for your husband, why do you marry afterward? It is an execrable thing, brethren, neither to keep charity for one's spouse, nor faith for God. This reproof awaits men also. VII. Therefore the Christian ought not at all to doubt that the dead are roused to their pristine state: and that such persons are brought forth on the lawful day before the sight of God from that secret of nature, such as they had been received according to each one's own quality—the Apostle saying: We must all be made manifest before the tribunal of Christ; that everyone may receive the deserts of his own body according to what he has done, whether good or evil (2 Cor. 5:10). For, brethren, it is easier for that to be re-formed which has been, than for that to be instituted which was not before:
你若是出於對丈夫的愛而如此行,為何隨後又再嫁呢?弟兄們,既不為配偶存守愛心,又不為神存守信實,這是可憎之事。這責備也等候著男人。七、所以基督徒絕不該懷疑:死人必被喚回其原初的狀態;並且這等人在那合法之日,從自然的那隱密之處被帶到神面前,各人按其本身的品質如何被收取,便如何被帶出——使徒說:我們眾人必要在基督臺前顯露出來,叫各人按著本身所行的,或善或惡受報(林後五10)。因為弟兄們,使曾經存在之物重新成形,比使從前不存在之物被造出來,乃是更容易的事:
1:234
quod si non fuit, et est, multo magis poterit esse quod fuit; quippe cum illius potentissimi artificis rerum omnium con­ ditoris ipse sit usus, impossibilium (41) possibilitatem adserere, ex eoque, quod non est, facere, quod est, naturam creare (42) extra naturam, nihil prorsus ha­ bere difficile, solumque ei hoc deesse, qnod nolit esse; hæc est enim proprietas Dei id operari, quod non potest credi. VIII. Igitur non homines tantum, sed pene omnia suis mortibus vivunt. Unde pauca de multis attin­ gam , ut omnium probationem haud dubie in paucis expediam.
for if what was not, now is, much more can that be which has been; since indeed it is the very practice of that most powerful Artificer, the Creator of all things, to assert the possibility of impossible things, and from that which is not to make that which is, to create nature outside of nature, to have absolutely nothing difficult, and that this alone is wanting to Him—what He does not will to be; for this is the property of God, to work that which cannot be believed. VIII. Therefore not men only, but almost all things live by their own deaths. Whence I will touch on a few out of many, that I may unhesitatingly expedite the proof of all in a few.
因為若那從前不存在之物如今存在,那麼那曾經存在之物豈不更能存在;因為這正是那至能的巧匠、萬物的創造者之慣常作為:宣告不可能之事的可能性,並從那不存在之物造出存在之物,在自然之外創造自然,於祂絕無任何難成之事,惟有一事是祂所缺的——就是祂所不願有的;因為這正是神的特性:行那不能被人相信之事。八、所以不單是人,幾乎萬物都藉著自己的死而活。因此我要從眾多之中略舉數例,好叫我以少數的例證毫不遲疑地辦妥對一切的證明。
1:235
(43) Stellæ praecipites labuntur e cœlo, et a tergo longo flammarum albescentium tractu fune­ rex facis solemnitate in occasus suos, quasi qui­ busdam deducuntur exsequiis : quas si per plagas, unde refixæ sunt, quæras, redivivi luminis lege suis sedibus resurrexisse agnoscas. Sol quotidie nasci­ tur, cademque die, qua nascitur , moritur; nec ta­ men instantis finis sorle terretur, 135 suos ut (41) repigret cursus, ut horas ac momenta producat, ut saltem paulo diutius diei sui demorctur in vita; sed fidelis semper , semper intrepidus , ad sepulerum noctis cognatae contendit, scitis in ipso se habere, quod vivit : denique adimitur ei ortus, si ei (45) au­ feratur occasus.
The stars fall headlong from heaven, and behind them, with a long trail of whitening flames, are led to their settings as if with a funereal solemnity of torches, by certain obsequies, as it were: which, if you seek them through the regions whence they were unfixed, you may recognize to have risen again in their own seats by the law of renewed light. The sun is daily born, and on the same day on which it is born, it dies; nor yet is it terrified by the lot of the impending end, so as to slacken its courses, to prolong the hours and moments, to linger at least a little longer in the life of its day; but ever faithful, ever undaunted, it hastens to the sepulcher of kindred night, knowing that it has within itself that whereby it lives: in short, its rising is taken away, if its setting be removed from it.
眾星從天上頭朝下墜落,在它們身後拖著一道長長的、漸漸發白的火焰尾跡,彷彿在火炬的喪禮儀式中、被某種送殯行列引向它們的落處:這些星,你若循著它們被卸下的那些區域去尋找,便可認出它們已照著光明重生的律例,在自己的位置上復活了。太陽日日被生出,又在它被生出的同一日死去;它卻不因臨近終結的命運而驚惶,以致放慢自己的行程,延長時辰與片刻,至少在自己白晝的生命中稍稍多留一會兒;而是始終忠信、始終無畏,奔向那同源之夜的墳墓,曉得它自身之內擁有那使它存活之物:簡言之,它的升起若被奪去落下,便也被奪去了。
1:236
Luna quoque, quæ vere (46) rationis humanæ omnia in se lincamenta depingit, nata (47) sanguineæ teneritudinis, dubio cornu primo quasi de cunis apparet, paulatimque crescendo jam pucila, jam virgo, pro quotidianæ ætatis incremento progrediens, lascivi cursus ambagibus carpit pensa mundana. At ubi matura aureo igne flagrantis luciflui aurigæ, par laboribus fratris (48) augustis circulis ar­ genteum compleverit globum, paulaiim devergit in senium , donec ultima senectute consumpta, sua morte reviviscens, menstrualis ignis solemni ger­ mine accenso sumat rursus de line principium. IX.
The moon also, which truly depicts in itself all the lineaments of human reason, born of a blood-red tenderness, first appears with doubtful horn as if from the cradle, and by little and little growing, now a girl, now a virgin, advancing according to the increase of her daily age, plucks her worldly tasks through the windings of her wanton course. But when, ripe with the golden fire of the gleaming, shining charioteer, equal in labors to her brother, she has completed her silvery globe in august circles, little by little she declines into old age, until, consumed by extreme senility, reviving by her own death, with the solemn sprouting of monthly fire kindled anew, she takes again from her end a beginning. IX.
月亮也是如此,它在自己身上真切地描繪出人類理性的一切形貌:它生於血紅色的柔嫩,起初彷彿從搖籃中以朦朧的角顯現,漸漸增長,時而是女童,時而是處女,按其日日年歲的增長而前進,在它放縱行程的迂迴中採取它屬世的份額。但當它以那輝煌閃耀御者的金色火焰成熟、在勞作上與它的兄弟相等、在莊嚴的軌道中完成它銀色的圓球時,它便漸漸衰退入老年,直到被極度的衰老所耗盡,藉著自己的死而復甦,以重新點燃的月度之火的莊嚴萌芽,再次從它的終結中取得開端。九、
1:237
Similiter (49) Phœnix avis illa pretiosa resur­ rectionis evidenter nos edocet jura, quæ nobilitatem generis sui non a parentibus 136 (50) Accipit , non liberis tradit : ipsa est sibi uterque sexus, ipsa omnis aff ctus, ipsa genus, ipsa finis, ipsa principium : non ex coitu nascitur, nec officio alieno nutritur : non invita, non imprudens moritur, sed cum maturum lethi tempus advenerit, a semetipsa (51) invitatis sacris iginibus libentissime concrematur. Sepulcrum nilus est illi, favillæ nutrices, cinis propagandi corporis semen, mors natalitius dies.
In like manner that precious bird, the Phoenix, plainly teaches us the laws of the resurrection, for it takes the nobility of its kind not from parents, nor passes it on to offspring: it is itself both sexes to itself, itself its whole affection, itself its own race, itself its end, itself its beginning. It is not born of intercourse, nor nourished by another's service; it dies neither unwilling nor unaware, but when the ripe hour of its death has come, of its own accord, having summoned the sacred flames, it is most willingly consumed in fire. The pyre is its nest, the embers its nurses, the ash is the seed for the propagating of its body, and death is its birthday.
同樣地,那珍奇的鳳凰鳥明明白白地教導我們復活的法則,因為牠承受自己族類的尊貴並非得自父母,也不傳給子嗣:牠本身對自己而言兼具兩性,本身就是一切的情愛,本身就是族類,本身就是終結,本身就是開端。牠不是由交合而生,也不靠他者的服事而養育;牠的死既非出於不情願,也非出於不知,而是當死亡成熟的時刻來臨,牠便自願召喚聖火,極其欣然地在火中焚盡。火葬的柴堆是牠的巢,餘燼是牠的乳母,灰燼是牠身體得以繁衍的種子,而死亡乃是牠的誕辰之日。
1:238
Denique post momentum festo exsultat in tumulo, non umbra , sed veritas, non imago, sed Phoenix, non alia, sed quamvis me­ lior alia, tamen prior ipsa. Erubesce, Christiana con­ scientia; vel tot ac tantis ex rebus, (52) quemadmodum rursum eadem, quæ es, sis melior futura, cognosce. X. Prælerea granum uniuscujusque frumenti con­ ditum terræ interit, et tamen in eo id quod intus est, reviviscit, nec mortem medullitus capit, sed suam sibi genitale in germen exspirans, vetusti cor­ poris superficie deleta, imo in inelioris naturae jura transmissa, felix caput comis virentibus redimitum, quasiab inferis emensum in superna sustollit, peren- nitatis gloriam fructu populoso tenturum :
Then, after a moment, it exults upon its festive tomb—not a shadow but a reality, not an image but the Phoenix, not another and yet, though better, the same as before, indeed itself prior. Blush, O Christian conscience; from things so many and so great learn how you yourself, remaining what you are, are to become better. X. Moreover, the grain of each kind of corn, buried in the earth, perishes, and yet that which is within it revives, nor does it take death to its very marrow, but breathing forth its own seed into a generative sprout, with the surface of the old body destroyed—nay, passed over into the laws of a better nature—the happy head, crowned with green foliage, as though risen from the dead, lifts itself on high into the heights, destined to hold the glory of perpetuity by a teeming harvest:
隨後,片刻之間,牠在自己歡慶的墳墓上歡躍——不是陰影,而是真實;不是形像,而是鳳凰;不是別一隻,然而雖然更美好,卻仍是先前的同一隻,實則正是牠自己。基督徒的良心啊,當羞愧吧;從這麼多、這麼大的事物中認清:你自己仍舊是你,卻將如何變得更美好。十、此外,每一種穀粒埋於地中便會腐朽,然而其中所含的卻復甦過來,並不讓死亡深入骨髓,反而將自己生發的種子吐入萌芽之中,舊體的外表既已毀壞——不,乃是轉入更美之本性的法則——那幸福的穀穗,以青翠的葉冠為飾,彷彿從陰間升起,將自己高舉到天上,註定要藉繁茂的果實掌握永恆的榮耀:
1:239
hoc hac­ tenus Paulo firmante : Stulte tu, quod seminas, non vivificatur, nisi 137 mortuum fuerit (I. Cor., XVI, 56). Et subjecit dicens: Sic et resurrectio mortuorum : seminatur in interitum, resurgit in perpetuitatem : se­ minatur in (55) humilitatem, resurgit in gloriam : se. minatur in infirmitatem, resurgit in virtutem : semina­ tur corpus animale, resurgit spiritale (Ib. 42 et seq.). Sa­ tis, ut opinor, resurrectionis veritas omnibus claret. XI. Sed necessario disserendum est, quæ sit in ea injustorum justorumque discretio, ne generalitas no- minis in comparatione malorum attrahat gloriam Christianæ felicitatis. Duplex itaque forma surgendi est:
and Paul thus far confirms this: O foolish one, what you sow is not made alive unless it die (1 Cor. 15:36). And he added, saying: So also is the resurrection of the dead: it is sown unto corruption, it rises in perpetuity; it is sown in lowliness, it rises in glory; it is sown in weakness, it rises in power; it is sown a natural body, it rises a spiritual body (ibid. 42 and following). Enough, as I think, does the truth of the resurrection shine forth to all. XI. But it must of necessity be discussed what distinction there is in it between the unjust and the just, lest the generality of the name draw to itself, in comparison with the wicked, the glory of Christian felicity. There is therefore a twofold manner of rising:
保羅也在此確證此事,說:愚蒙的人哪,你所種的若不死,就不能生(林前十五36)。他又接著說:死人復活也是這樣:所種的是必朽壞的,復活的是永不朽壞的;所種的是卑賤的,復活的是榮耀的;所種的是軟弱的,復活的是強壯的;所種的是血氣的身體,復活的是靈性的身體(同上42節以下)。我想,復活的真理已充分向眾人顯明。十一、但必須探討:在復活之中,不義之人與義人有何分別,免得這名稱的籠統性,在與惡人相比之下,奪去基督徒幸福的榮耀。因此,復活有兩種形式:
1:240
prima Sanctorum, in qua illud beatitudinis re­ gnum primæ tubae regali (54) tessera convocati capient cum ingenti triumpho aeterno rege sub Christo : se­ cunda vero, quæ (55) impios cum peccatoribus nni­ versisque incredulis gentibus perenni destinat pœnæ, in psalmis Spiritu sancto dicente : Ideo non resur­ gunt impii in judicio, neque peccatores in consilio jus­ torum ; quoniam scit Dominus viam justorum, et iter impiorum peribit ( Ps. I, 5, 6 ). XII. Consequens est, ut scire nos par sit , in quo habitu regnaturus sit homo Iste noster, qui tendit ad coelum : ne forte cum carne depereat vana (56) spe, si captus fuerit caduca atque carnali, de qua Aposto- Ius dicit :
the first is that of the Saints, in which, summoned by the royal token of the first trumpet, they shall receive that kingdom of blessedness with a mighty triumph under the eternal King, Christ; but the second is that which destines the impious, together with sinners and all unbelieving nations, to perpetual punishment, as the Holy Spirit says in the Psalms: Therefore the impious shall not rise in the judgment, nor sinners in the council of the just; for the Lord knows the way of the just, and the way of the impious shall perish (Ps. 1:5,6). XII. It follows that it is fitting for us to know in what state this man of ours, who tends toward heaven, is to reign: lest perchance, by vain hope, he perish together with the flesh, if he be seized by what is transitory and carnal, of which the Apostle says:
第一種是聖徒的復活,在其中他們被第一聲號角的王者印記所召集,要在永恆的君王基督之下,以浩大的凱旋承受那福樂的國度;第二種則是註定使不敬虔者連同罪人和一切不信的列邦受永刑的復活,正如聖靈在詩篇中所說:因此,不敬虔的人在審判中站立不住,罪人在義人的會中也是如此;因為耶和華知道義人的道路,不敬虔者的道路卻必滅亡(詩一5、6)。十二、由此可知,我們理當知道:我們這位趨向天國的人,要以何種狀態執掌王權;免得他因虛妄的盼望而與肉體一同滅亡,若他被那短暫而屬肉體的事物所擄獲,使徒論到這事說:
1:241
Caro et sanguis regnum Dei possidere non possunt ( I Cor. XV, 50). At e diverso videor mihi audire proclamantem : Si hæc est conditio carnis , quid est ergo quod credimus in Ecclesia (57) remissam peccatorum ac resurrectionem carnis? Facile, fratres, pugna ista concordat, statusque futuri qualitas aperi­ tur, fides si illibata teneatur. Unde rem paucis expe­ diam. Omnis caro, quamdiu flagitiosis illecebris hu­ jus mundi, ac tenebris feralibus agitatur,profecto(58) pecuina est. ac misero, fragili detestabilique versatur in (59) jure.
Flesh and blood cannot possess the kingdom of God (1 Cor. 15:50). But on the other hand I seem to hear someone exclaiming: If this is the condition of the flesh, what then is it that we believe in the Church—the remission of sins and the resurrection of the flesh? Easily, brethren, this conflict is reconciled, and the quality of our future state is laid open, if the faith be held inviolate. Wherefore I will dispatch the matter in few words. All flesh, so long as it is driven by the shameful enticements of this world and by deadly darkness, is assuredly bestial, and dwells under a wretched, fragile, and detestable law.
血肉之軀不能承受神的國(林前十五50)。但另一方面,我彷彿聽見有人喊道:若這就是肉體的處境,那麼我們在教會中所信的——罪得赦免與肉身復活——又算什麼呢?弟兄們,這看似的衝突很容易調和,我們將來狀態的性質也得以揭明,只要信仰持守而不受玷污。因此我要用三言兩語把此事說清。一切肉體,只要還被這世界可恥的誘惑與致命的黑暗所驅使,便確實是獸性的,活在悲慘、脆弱而可憎的律法之下。
1:242
138 At cum (60) mera fide credentis salutari fuerit necata baptismatc, nova paterni sacro resurgil fontis ex gurgite, jam pura, jam libera, jam a conversatione mundi hujus extranea, jam morte supe­ rior, jam coelestia adspirans, jam, non dicam sæculi lu­ dibria, sed ut sit honoratior, seipsam contemnens, jam veritatem, non imaginem quaerens, jam spiritalia, non sua desiderans, de qua Paulus ait : Non omnis caro eadem est caro : alia est hominis, (61) alia jumenti, alia caro volucrum, alia piscium. Et corpora sunt cœlestia, sunt et terrestria (I Cor. xv, 39, 40). Itaque immor­ talitatis semine, de quo etiam Poeta sapientissimus præsagivit dicens :
But when, by the pure faith of the believer, it has been slain by saving baptism, it rises new from the flood of the Father's sacred fount—now pure, now free, now a stranger to the converse of this world, now superior to death, now aspiring to heavenly things; now, I will not say despising the mockeries of the age, but, that it may be more honored, despising its very self; now seeking the truth, not the image; now desiring spiritual things, not its own, concerning which Paul says: Not all flesh is the same flesh: one is the flesh of man, another of beasts, another the flesh of birds, another of fishes. And there are heavenly bodies, and there are earthly ones (1 Cor. 15:39,40). And so, by the seed of immortality, of which even the most wise Poet foresaw, saying:
但當牠藉信徒純全的信德,被那拯救的洗禮所殺死之後,便從父那聖泉的水流中重新升起——如今潔淨、如今自由、如今與這世界的交往疏離、如今勝過死亡、如今嚮往天上之事;如今,我不說牠藐視今世的嘲弄,而是為了更受尊榮,連自己也藐視;如今尋求真實,而非形像;如今渴慕屬靈之事,而非自己之物,保羅論到這事說:凡肉體各有不同:人是一樣,獸是另一樣,飛鳥的肉體是一樣,魚的又是一樣。又有天上的形體,也有地上的形體(林前十五39、40)。如此,藉著不朽的種子——連那最有智慧的詩人也曾預示說:
1:243
Igneus est ollis vigor, et cœlestis origo Seminibus : scilicet Spiritus sancti conceptione insila fit ante fe­ cunda, ut cum dissolutionis ejus ac legitimae repara­ tionis templis advenerit, suo semini respondens jure possit mereri quod credimus. Nec res in ambiguo est ; quemadmodum etenim ille princeps iniquitatis suo semine per invidiam protoplastos (6i) ex angelis in homines derivavit ; ita Dominus omnes in se cre­ dentes Sancti spiritus semine a mortuis rursus glo­ riosos in angelos excitabit (Matth. XXIII, 30 ). 139 XIII. Ad hoc unum evidens adhuc (63) pro­ feramus exemplum, quamvis non possit verisimile tantam vim habere, quam veriias. Oleaster sua infe­ lix et amarus est in natura;
Fiery is their vigor, and heavenly the origin of those seeds—that is, by the conception of the Holy Spirit the flesh is made fruitful beforehand by an implanted power, so that when the time of its dissolution and lawful restoration has come, corresponding to its own seed it may by right be able to merit what we believe. Nor is the matter in doubt; for just as that prince of iniquity, by his own seed, through envy, drew down the first-formed beings from angels into men, so the Lord will rouse up again all who believe in Him from the dead, by the seed of the Holy Spirit, glorious into angels (Matt. 22:30). XIII. To this let us bring forward one yet plainer example, though the likely cannot have so great a force as the truth has. The wild olive is by nature barren and bitter;
那些種子的活力是熾烈的,源頭是屬天的——也就是說,藉著聖靈的感孕,肉體先被一種內植的能力使其能孕育,以致當其解體與合法復原的時候來臨,牠便能按照自己的種子,有權配得我們所信的。這事毫無可疑;正如那邪惡之君藉自己的種子、出於嫉妒,將最初受造之物從天使引降為人,照樣,主也要藉聖靈的種子,使一切信祂的人從死裡再次興起,榮耀地化為天使(太二十二30)。十三、為此,讓我們再舉一個更明顯的例子,雖然「貌似」之事不能像真理那樣具有如此大的力量。野橄欖按本性是貧瘠而苦澀的;
1:244
sed cum fuerit peritis­ simi agricolæ artiOcis manu necessaria provisione truncatus, nobilitate alieni scminis gravidatur, nutri- turque ab eo ipso, quod nutrit, donec hospilis ger­ minis adoptiva pinguedine assumptus, imo pinguedo ipse factus, totusque (64) acceptum translatus in hono­ rem novac frondis promotione ramis resurgescentibus ornatus, jam non oleaster sit, sed oliva; cum et oleaster sit, et tamen oleastrum (65) se non esse quodam modo etiam ipse miretur. Igitur si homo potest facere ut sit arbor, quod non fuit, salvo quod fuit, quanto magis Deus hominem polerit (66) excitare, antequam peccasset in paradiso. in.id quod fuit ?
but when, by the necessary provision of the most skilled husbandman's craftsman hand, it has been pruned, it is made pregnant with the nobility of another's seed, and is nourished by that very thing which it nourishes, until, taken up by the adoptive richness of the guest-graft—nay, made the richness itself—and wholly translated into the honor it has received, adorned by the promotion of new foliage with branches springing up again, it is now no longer a wild olive, but an olive tree; though it both is a wild olive, and yet in a certain manner even itself marvels that it is not a wild olive. Therefore if a man can bring it about that there be a tree which was not, while what it was remains, how much more shall God be able to raise up man, into what he was before he had sinned in paradise?
但當牠藉最熟練的農夫工匠之手、按必要的料理而被砍削之後,便孕育著他者種子的尊貴,並由牠所滋養之物本身來滋養牠,直到牠被那寄居接枝的收養肥沃所吸納——不,竟成了那肥沃本身——並全然被遷入所領受的尊榮,以新葉的繁茂為飾、枝條重新萌發,如今便不再是野橄欖,而是橄欖樹了;雖然牠既是野橄欖,卻又以某種方式連自己也驚奇於自己已不是野橄欖。所以,倘若人能使一棵原本不是的樹成為樹,而其原本所是仍存留,那麼神豈不更能將人興起,回到他在樂園中犯罪以前的光景嗎?
1:245
Quam rationem seminum etiam beatissimus Paulus subtiliter prodidit dicens : Qui seminat secundum carnem, de carne sua metet (67) interitum; qui autem seminat in spirtu, de spiritu metet vitan. æternam ( Gal. vi, 8). At vero Dominus evidenter hoc edocens sic ad discipulos ait : Simile est regnum coelorum homini, qui seminavit bonum se­ men in agro suo : dormientibus autem hominibus venit inimicus ejus, et superseminavit zizania in triticum (Matth. XIII, 24. 25). XIV. At fortasse adhuc quispiam dicat : Si caro perit, unde cognoscitur ille qui resurgit?
This principle of seeds the most blessed Paul also subtly disclosed, saying: He that sows according to the flesh shall of his flesh reap corruption; but he that sows in the spirit shall of the spirit reap life eternal (Gal. 6:8). But the Lord, plainly teaching this, thus says to His disciples: The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field; but while men slept, his enemy came and oversowed tares among the wheat (Matt. 13:24,25). XIV. But perhaps someone will yet say: If the flesh perishes, how is the one who rises recognized?
關於種子的這道理,至福的保羅也精微地揭示出來,說:順著肉體撒種的,必從肉體收敗壞;順著聖靈撒種的,必從聖靈收永生(加六8)。而主明明地教導這事,這樣對門徒說:天國好像人撒好種在田裡;及至人睡覺的時候,有仇敵來,將稗子撒在麥子中間(太十三24、25)。十四、但或許還有人會說:肉體既然朽壞,那復活的人怎能被認出來呢?
1:246
Caro, fra­ tres, quasi quoddam est speculum intuentis plenitu­ dine (68) gravidatum, quod non tam imaginem suam quam (69) ejus, cujus est in usibus gerit. Denique tot efficit vultus, quot ille intrinsecus tristes, sen hilares suos fecerit motus, hanc ratioem docente nos Paulo: Videmus, inquit, autem modo per speculum in ænigma- te, tunc autem facies ad faciem erit ( I Cor. XIII, 12 ). Unde dubium non est in corporibus nostris, 140 dum mortis lege sefhinantur, non substantiam, non imaginem, sed illud tantum, quod inutile est, dis­ cuti, quod teritur, demutari, sicut scriptum est : Oportet enim corruptivum hoc induere incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induere immortalitatem (I Cor. xv, 53):
The flesh, brethren, is, as it were, a kind of mirror, pregnant with the fullness of the one who gazes into it, which bears not so much its own image as the image of him whose use it serves. Indeed it produces as many countenances as the inner man has made his own motions sad or glad—this principle Paul teaching us: We see now, he says, through a mirror in an enigma, but then it shall be face to face (1 Cor. 13:12). Hence there is no doubt that in our bodies, while they are sown under the law of death, it is not the substance, not the image, but only that which is useless which is shaken off, that which is worn down which is changed, as it is written: For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality (1 Cor. 15:53):
弟兄們,肉體就如同一面鏡子,孕含著注視它者的豐滿,它所映現的,與其說是自己的形像,不如說是那使用它者的形像。實在地,它所現出的面容有多少,全看那內在之人使自己的動向變得憂愁或歡喜有多少——保羅以這道理教導我們:他說,我們如今彷彿對著鏡子觀看,模糊不清,到那時就要面對面了(林前十三12)。因此毫無疑問,在我們的身體裡,當它們按死亡的律被撒下時,被搖落的並非本質,並非形像,而只是那無用之物;被改變的乃是那被磨損之物,正如經上所記:這必朽壞的總要變成不朽壞的,這必死的總要變成不死的(林前十五53):
1:247
aliter (70) enim immortalitatis stola illa non sumitur, nisi primo istud carnale spolium. blandum animae venenum, secundum Dei sententiam, unde sumptum est, refundatur, dicit enim Deus ad Adam : Male- dicta terra erit in omnibus operibus tuis, in tristitiæ ge­ mitu edes ex ea onmibus diebus vitæ tuæ : spinas et tribulos ejiciet tibi, et edes pabulum agri : in sudore ,ullus tui edes panem tuum, donec revertaris in terram (Gen. in, 17 et seq.). Sed et Dominus (71) ex persona hominis, quem assumpserat, ait : Tristis est anima mea usque ad mortem (Matth. XXVI, 38). Quod dictum non tam timentis, quam exsultantis ac docentis est. Utique :
for otherwise that robe of immortality is not assumed, unless first this carnal spoil, the flattering poison of the soul, by God's sentence be poured back whence it was taken; for God says to Adam: Cursed shall the earth be in all your works; in the groaning of sorrow shall you eat of it all the days of your life; it shall bring forth for you thorns and thistles, and you shall eat the fodder of the field; in the sweat of your brow shall you eat your bread, until you return to the earth (Gen. 3:17 and following). But the Lord also, in the person of the man whom He had assumed, says: My soul is sorrowful even unto death (Matt. 26:38). Which saying is not so much of one fearing as of one exulting and teaching. Assuredly:
因為不然的話,那不朽的長袍便不能披上,除非先把這屬肉體的擄物——靈魂諂媚的毒藥——按神的判決,傾倒回它被取出之處;因為神對亞當說:地必因你的緣故在你一切工作上受咒詛;你必終身在愁苦的哀嘆中吃地裡所出的;地必給你長出荊棘和蒺藜來,你也要吃田間的菜蔬;你必汗流滿面才得糊口,直到你歸了土(創三17以下)。但主也以祂所取的那人的身分說:我心裡甚是憂傷,幾乎要死(太二十六38)。這句話與其說是出於懼怕者,不如說是出於歡躍者與教導者。誠然:
1:248
non enim quidquam timere poterat, qui mortuos excitabat, qui potestatem habuit ponendi eam, et itcrum resumendi eam ( Jo. x, 18 ); scd ut doceret, quoniam cum vivit.in hoc mundo, semper in tribulatione, semper justus in poena est. Cum autem mors, quæ putatur metuenda, gustatur; tunc ei in æternum manentis gloriæ beatis in sedibus, nullas dcinceps ærumnas mundi sensura, repromissa felici­ tas exhibetur, David sancto dicente : Convertere, anima mea, in requiem tuam, quia Dominus benefecit mihi, quia liberavit animam meum a morte, oculos meos a lacrymis, pedes meos a lapsu : placebo Domino in re­ gione vivorum ( Ps. CXIV, 7 et seq. ). Hæc nos felicitas manet, hoc munus exspectat.
for He who raised the dead could fear nothing, He who had power to lay it down and to take it up again (John 10:18); but that He might teach that, while one lives in this world, the just man is ever in tribulation, ever in suffering. But when death, which is thought to be feared, is tasted, then to him the promised felicity of glory enduring forever is displayed in the seats of the blessed, where he shall thenceforth feel no more the hardships of the world—as holy David says: Return, O my soul, into your rest, for the Lord has dealt bountifully with you, for He has delivered my soul from death, my eyes from tears, my feet from falling: I will please the Lord in the land of the living (Ps. 116:7 and following). This felicity awaits us, this gift expects us.
因為那叫死人復活的、那有權柄捨命又有權柄取回的(約十18),祂無所懼怕;但這乃是要教導:人活在這世上時,義人總是在患難中,總是在受苦中。然而當那被認為可懼的死亡一被嚐到,那永遠長存之榮耀所應許的幸福,便在蒙福者的座位中向他展現,他從此再也感受不到世上的艱辛——正如聖王大衛所說:我的心哪,你要仍歸安息,因為耶和華用厚恩待你,因祂救我的命脫離死亡,救我的眼免了流淚,救我的腳免於跌倒:我要在活人之地行在耶和華面前蒙祂喜悅(詩一一六7以下)。這幸福在等候我們,這恩賜在期待我們。
1:249
Sic ergo vivamus, ut bonis operibus decorati, nos quoque (72) Deo Patri placere mereamur, Domino juvante nos Christo, qui est benedictus in saecula sæculorum. 141 TRACTATUUM SANCTI , ZENONIS EPISCOPI VERONENSIS LIBER SECUNDUS. TRACTATUS PRIMUS. De (1) Genesi. — Contra Arianos. I. Carnalis mentis homines, fratres dilectissimi, scandalum patiuntur, non studio noscendæ, sed frustrandæ veritatis, quotiens Deus Dei filius, qui Patris maxima est gloria, aequalis Patri a Catholicis prædicatur.
Let us therefore so live that, adorned with good works, we too may merit to please God the Father, with our Lord Christ helping us, who is blessed unto the ages of ages. THE SECOND BOOK OF THE TRACTATES OF SAINT ZENO, BISHOP OF VERONA. THE FIRST TRACTATE. On Genesis.—Against the Arians. I. Men of carnal mind, most beloved brethren, suffer a stumbling-block—not from a zeal to know, but to frustrate the truth—as often as God the Son of God, who is the supreme glory of the Father, is proclaimed by the Catholics to be equal to the Father.
因此,讓我們如此生活,以善行為妝飾,叫我們也配得討父神的喜悅,有我們的主基督幫助我們,祂是當受稱頌、直到萬世萬代的。維羅納主教聖芝諾講道集第二卷。第一篇講道。論創世記——駁亞流派。一、最親愛的弟兄們,屬肉體之心思的人受到絆跌——並非出於求知的熱忱,而是要使真理落空——每當神之子,就是父最高的榮耀,被大公教會宣告為與父同等之時。
1:250
(2) Denique inde est, quod (3) legis fun­ damenta temnentes, versuta disputatione, præter- misso Deo de Deo exeunte, ad communia humani­ tatis nomina, quæ possunt argumentis attingi, (4) Patris et Filii festinant : nec intelligunt, quia in exordio (5) carminis sacri Deus Deo sua sibi et di­ vinitate et nomine comparatus, omnes humani sensus opinationes excludit: quippe cum 142 dicat: Faciamus hominem ad imaginem, et similitudinem nostram, non inquit, fac ad tuam sed ait, faciamus ad nostram (Gen. i, 26): (6) ne quam Filius hominem induturus pati videretur injuriam. Videtisne, fratres dilectis- simi, quia nullus (1) exserte hic alteri Jubet, in opere nullus otiosus est?
And so it comes about that, despising the foundations of the law, by crafty disputation, leaving aside God who comes forth from God, they hasten to the common names of humanity belonging to Father and Son—names that can be attacked by arguments—and they do not understand that, at the very opening of the sacred song, God, compared to God by His own divinity and name, excludes all the opinions of human sense: since indeed He says, Let us make man to our image and likeness; He does not say, 'Make to your image,' but says, 'Let us make to our image' (Gen. 1:26): lest the Son, who was to put on man, should seem to suffer any injury. Do you not see, most beloved brethren, that here no one expressly commands the other, that in the work no one is idle?
於是便有此事:他們藐視律法的根基,以詭詐的辯論,撇開那從神而出的神,急忙轉向屬父與子的人性方面的共通名稱——這些名稱可被論證所攻擊——卻不明白:在那聖頌的開端,神既以自己的神性與名稱與神相比,便排除了一切人類官能的臆斷:因為祂說:我們要照著我們的形像、按著我們的樣式造人;祂不說「照你的形像造」,乃說「照我們的形像造」(創一26):免得那將要披戴人性的子顯得受了什麼委屈。最親愛的弟兄們,你們豈不看見:在此沒有一位明確地吩咐另一位,在工作中沒有一位是閒著的嗎?
1:251
0 sancta (8) æqualitas, ac sibi soli dignissima individuæ deitatis! Unus homo ad (9) duorum imaginem et similitudinem fingitur' i nec tamen in eo, quid cujus sit, invenitur. Si igitur in opere extraneo paritas sacra distingui non potest; Deus in alio se inferior esse quemadmodum potest, quidquid enim uni ex duobus indiserete in omnibus sibimet (10) similantibus detraxcris, cui detraxeris, (II), nescis. 143 II. At ille, cui jubet ur, est, (12) inquis. inferior. Quid? quod inde non esse approbatur inferior : quia unde processit, palernl cordis est (13) exsecntor; non enim minus est facere magna, quam dicere.
O holy equality, alone most worthy of the undivided Deity! One man is fashioned to the image and likeness of the two, and yet in him it is not found which belongs to whom. If therefore in an external work the sacred parity cannot be distinguished, how can God be inferior to another in Himself? For whatever you take away from one of two who are in all things alike to each other indistinctly, you do not know from which you have taken it. II. But that one, you say, who is commanded, is inferior. What? Yet thereby He is proved not to be inferior: because whence He proceeded, He is the executor of the paternal heart; for it is no less to do great things than to speak them.
哦,聖潔的同等啊,唯獨牠最配得那不可分的神性!一個人被造成那二者的形像與樣式,然而在他身上卻找不出何者屬於誰。所以,若在一件外在的工作中,那神聖的同等尚且無法區分,那麼神在自身之中怎能比另一位低等呢?因為無論你從那彼此在一切事上毫無分別地相同的二者之一中取去什麼,你都不知道你是從哪一位那裡取去的。二、但你說:那被吩咐的一位是低等的。怎麼說呢?然而正因此祂被證明並非低等:因為祂從之而出之處,正是那父之心意的執行者;因為行大事並不亞於說大事。
1:252
Quamvis et quod dictum est a Patre, vel dici potest, quia Verbum est Filius, sine Filio non est: et quod factum est a Filio, vel fieri potest, sine dignatione paterna non est; quia Filius sine Patre non est, ipso dicente : Si non facio facta Patris, nolite mihi 144 cre­ dere: sed si mihi credere non vultis, factis credite; el co­ gnoSCite, quoniam in me est Pater, et ego in illo (Joan. x, 37 et 38). Constat ergo æqualem esse, (14) quod in­ vicem se capit cum Spiritu sancto. TRACTATUS II. De Genesi. Nisi quis hostem, a quo impugnatur, expugnet, numquam bonis suls po!erlt uti sccurus:
Although even what is said by the Father can also be said, because the Word is the Son, and is not without the Son; and what is made by the Son can also be made, but it is not without the paternal good-pleasure, because the Son is not without the Father, as He Himself says: If I do not the works of the Father, believe Me not; but if you will not believe Me, believe the works; and know that the Father is in Me, and I in Him (John 10:37,38). It is established, therefore, that He is equal, since each receives the other together with the Holy Spirit. THE SECOND TRACTATE. On Genesis. Unless a man conquers the enemy by whom he is assailed, he can never use his goods in security:
雖然連那由父所說的也能被說出,因為那道就是子,且不能離了子而有;而那由子所造的也能被造,但這不能離了父的美意,因為子不能離了父,正如祂自己所說:我若不行我父的事,你們就不必信我;你們若不信我,也當信這些事;好叫你們知道父在我裡面,我也在父裡面(約十37、38)。因此確定無疑:祂是同等的,因為各位連同聖靈彼此互相含容。第二篇講道。論創世記。人若不擊敗那攻擊他的仇敵,就永遠不能安穩地享用自己的財物:
1:253
sunt enim (1) multi, qui adserere conantur chaos in principio fuisse, id est informem, indigestamque latentis na­ turae congeriem, acervo quodam magnitudinis suæ per se 145 in se (2) manentem : postea vero Deum hanc diremisse, ex eaque constituisse mundum pariter et ornasse. Igitur si, ut volunt, Deus materiam, qua usus est, non fecit, sed æterna sit, ut ipse est; duo sunt (3) ergo principia, et quidem repugnantia: ac per hoc necessario requirendum nobis erit, (4) quid sit fortius de duobus, illud quod sensibile est, an quod caret sensu.
for there are many who try to assert that there was chaos in the beginning—that is, a formless and undigested heap of latent nature, abiding by itself in itself in a certain mass of its own magnitude; but afterward, they say, God divided this, and out of it both constituted the world and adorned it. Now if, as they will have it, God did not make the matter which He used, but it is eternal as He Himself is, then there are two principles, and indeed contrary ones; and through this it will necessarily have to be inquired by us which of the two is the stronger—that which is sensible, or that which lacks sense.
因為有許多人試圖主張:起初有混沌,也就是潛伏之自然界一團無形、未經整治的雜聚物,憑著自身某種巨量自存於己中;但他們說,神後來把這雜聚分開,又從中構成並裝飾了世界。那麼,倘若如他們所願,神並未造祂所用的物質,而那物質乃像祂自己一樣是永恆的,那麼就有兩個本原,而且還是彼此相違的;因此我們便必須探究:這二者之中哪一個更強——是那有知覺的,還是那無知覺的。
1:254
Verum quis duhitet, illud fortius csse, quod sentit, quod sapit, quod cogitat, qnod (5) mo* vel, quod movetur, quod mira providentia chaos ip­ sum, ut chaos non esset, effecit, quod ejus membra discrevit, ratione disposuit, coloribus decoravit, de­ terminavit mensura, officiisque competentius s r- vire præcepit? Unde non est principium, quod se­ nescit; quod opus factum est alienum; quod non est in sua positum potestate; quod a sua substantia tol­ litur; quod mutatur; quod alieno movetur pulsu; quod, quid sit, quid fuerit, quid futurum sit, non po­ test aliquando sentire. Solus Deus est itaque princi­ pium, qui (G) ex 146 se ipso dedit sibi ipse princi­ pium.
But who would doubt that the stronger is that which feels, which is wise, which thinks, which moves and is moved, which by wondrous providence brought it about that the very chaos should not be chaos, which separated its members, arranged them by reason, adorned them with colors, determined them by measure, and commanded them to serve more fittingly in their offices? Hence that is no principle which grows old; which is made another's work; which is not placed in its own power; which is taken from its own substance; which is changed; which is moved by another's impulse; which can never at any time feel what it is, what it was, what it shall be. God alone, therefore, is the principle, who out of Himself gave to Himself His own beginning.
但誰能懷疑:那更強的乃是那有感覺、有智慧、有思想、能動又被動的,那以奇妙的眷顧使混沌本身不再是混沌的,那分別其各部、按理性安排、用色彩裝飾、以度量限定、並命它們在各自職分上更合宜地服事的?因此,凡會衰老的、被造成他者作品的、不在自己權能之下的、可從自己本質中被取去的、會改變的、被他者推動而動的、永遠不能感知自己是什麼、曾是什麼、將是什麼的——這都不是本原。所以唯獨神是本原,祂從自己出,將起始賜給自己。
1:255
Solus ante omnia et post omnia, quoniam in ejus manu inclusa sunt omnia, ex se est, quod est. Solus sui conscius, quantus et qualis est. Solus perfectus; quia non potest illi aliquid nec addi, nec minui. So- Ius omnipotens, quia ex nihilo universa constituit, virtute regit, majestate custodit. Solus indemutabilis, ac semper æqualis; quia in sc non admittit ætatem. Solus sempiternus : quia immortalitatis est Dominus. Hic est Deus noster, qui se (7) digessit in Deum. Hic Pater, qui suo manente (8) integro statu, totum se (9) reciprocavit in Filium, ne qu id sibimetderogaret. Denique alter in altero (10) exsultat, cum Spiritus sancti plenitudine una originali coæternitate reni­ tens.
Alone before all things and after all things, since in His hand all things are enclosed, He is of Himself what He is. Alone conscious of Himself, how great and of what kind He is. Alone perfect; because nothing can be either added to Him or taken away. Alone almighty, because out of nothing He constituted the universe, rules it by power, guards it by majesty. Alone unchangeable, and ever equal; because in Himself He admits no age. Alone everlasting: because He is the Lord of immortality. This is our God, who arranged Himself into God. This is the Father, who, His own state remaining entire, wholly reflected Himself into the Son, that He might detract nothing from Himself. In fine, the one exults in the other, shining together with the fullness of the Holy Spirit in one original co-eternity.
祂在萬有之先、又在萬有之後,獨自存在,因為萬有都被握在祂手中,祂的所是出於自己。唯獨祂知道自己是何等偉大、何等性質。唯獨祂全備;因為對祂既不能有所增添,也不能有所減損。唯獨祂全能,因為祂從無中構成宇宙,以能力治理它,以威嚴守護它。唯獨祂不變,且永遠如一;因為祂在自身中不容歲月。唯獨祂永恆:因為祂是不朽之主。這就是我們的神,祂將自己安排為神。這就是父,祂在自己的狀態完整不變之中,將自己全然反映於子,以免從自己有所減損。總之,這一位在那一位裡歡躍,連同聖靈的豐滿,在同一本源的同永恆中一同煥發光輝。
1:256
Quemadmodum (si dicere dignum est) (11) duo maria, quae in semet recumbunt, freto æstus alternos in unum conferente, connexa, quæ licet sui proprie­ tale, locis vocabulisque discreta sint, tamen trini pro­ fundi (12) vaporis una virtus, una substantia, una est finiendi natura; nec potest incomprehensibilis, com­ munisque (15) undæ dividi magnitudo, 147 utro. que in utrumque commcando largiflua, utrisque pro­ pria, nulli privata : etenim damnum patientur uber­ latis et gratiæ, si adimatur, quod uno eodemque æstu alterum ex altero decoratur. TRACTATUS III. De Genesi (1) seu de alterna. Filii Dei generatione. Principium (2),.
Just as (if it be worthy to say it) two seas, which recline upon themselves, joined by a strait conveying their alternating tides into one—though they be distinct by their own property, by places and by names—yet of the triple deep there is one power of vapor, one substance, one nature of bounding; nor can the incomprehensible and common greatness of the wave be divided, flowing abundantly each into the other, proper to both, denied to neither: for indeed they would suffer loss of richness and grace, were that taken away whereby, by one and the same tide, the one is adorned from the other. THE THIRD TRACTATE. On Genesis, or on the eternal generation of the Son of God. In the beginning,
正如(若這比喻配得一提)兩片海洋,各自臥於己上,藉一道海峽把彼此交替的潮汐匯為一體而相連——雖然它們按各自的特性、按地方與名稱有所分別——然而那三重深淵卻有一個蒸氣的能力、一個本質、一個界限的本性;那不可測度而共有的浪濤之浩瀚不能被分割,豐盈地彼此互流、為二者所共有、不為任何一方所私據:因為實在地,倘若把那「藉同一潮汐使一者由另一者得妝飾」之事除去,它們便要喪失豐饒與恩澤。第三篇講道。論創世記,或論神之子的永恆受生。起初,
1:257
fratres dilectissimi, Dominus nos­ ter 148 (3) incunctauter cal Christus, , quem ante omnia sæcula pater in profundo suæ (4) sacræ men­ lis arcano insuspicabili . ac soli sibi nota conscien­ tia , Filii non sine affectu , sed (5) sine revelamine amplectebatur. Igitur ineffabilis illa incomprehensi- bilisque sapientia sapientiam , omnipotentia omni­ potentiam propagat. (6) De Deo nascitur 149 Deus, de ingenito unigenitus, de solo solus, de toto totus, de vero verus , de perfecto perfectus. Totum Patris habens, nihil derogans Patri. (7) Procedit in nativi­ tatem, qui erat (8), antequam nasceretur, 150 in Patre æqualis in omnibus;
most beloved brethren, our Lord is, unhesitatingly, Christ, whom before all ages the Father embraced in the deep, unsuspectable, and to Himself alone known secret of His sacred mind—as Son, not without affection, but without disclosure. Therefore that ineffable and incomprehensible Wisdom propagates wisdom, the omnipotence omnipotence. From God is born God, from the unbegotten the only-begotten, from the only one the only one, from the whole the whole, from the true the true, from the perfect the perfect. Having all that is the Father's, detracting nothing from the Father. He proceeds into birth, who was, before He was born, equal in all things in the Father;
最親愛的弟兄們,我們的主毫無疑問就是基督,祂在萬世之先,被父懷抱在祂聖心那深邃、不可揣測、唯獨祂自己所知的隱秘之中——作為子,並非沒有愛,乃是沒有顯露。因此,那不可言喻、不可測度的智慧生出智慧,全能生出全能。神由神而生,獨生者由不受生者而生,獨一者由獨一者而生,全者由全者而生,真者由真者而生,全備者由全備者而生。祂擁有父一切之所有,卻絲毫不減損父。祂在受生之前,已在父裡面凡事與父同等,如今卻進入受生;
1:258
quia Pater (9) in ipsum alium se genuit ex se, ex innascibili scilicet sua illa substantia, in qua beatus manens in sempiternum omnibus, quæ habet, habentem Filium paria (10) pro­ creavit, qui est Deus benedictus in sæcula sæculorum. TRACTATUS IV . De (1) Genesi, seu de æterna Filii Dei generatione. Sicut sacra Scriptura testatur, erat ante ominia manens (2) unus et idem alter ei semetipso in se­ meti psum 151 Deus, (3) secreti sui solus conscius, cujus es ore, (4) 152 ut rerum natura, quæ non erat, fingeretur, prodivit unigenitus Filius , cordis ejus.
because the Father begot in Him another self out of Himself—namely, out of that unbegettable substance of His, in which, blessedly abiding forever, He brought forth the Son equal to Himself, having all that He has, the Son who is God blessed unto the ages of ages. THE FOURTH TRACTATE. On Genesis, or on the eternal generation of the Son of God. As the sacred Scripture testifies, before all things there abode one and the same God, another to Himself within Himself, alone conscious of His own secret, from whose mouth—that the nature of things, which was not, might be fashioned—came forth the only-begotten Son of His heart.
因為父在祂裡面從自己生出另一個自己——也就是從祂那不可受生的本質中,在這本質裡祂永遠蒙福地存留,生出那與自己同等、擁有祂一切所有的子,這子就是當受稱頌、直到萬世萬代的神。第四篇講道。論創世記,或論神之子的永恆受生。正如聖經所見證的,在萬有之先,存留著獨一且同一的神,在自身之內對自己而言乃是另一位,唯獨祂自知自己的隱秘,從祂口中——為使那原本不存在的萬物之本性得以被造——發出了祂心中的獨生子。
1:259
nobilis inquilinus exinde visibilis (5) necessa­ rio effectus, quia orbem terrae erat ipse facturus, humanumque visitaturus genus, alias aequalis in om­ nibus Patri : quidquid enim Pater (6) præcepit, ut fieret; Fitis, utpote Dei virtus Deique 153 sapien­ tia, omnia illa opere miriifico ejus (7) cum dicto com­ plevit. Uuuc (8) curiosi opinationibus (9) vanis vio- lare conantur; nunc intelligunt miseri, quoniam cu* riositas (10) reum efficit, non peritum. 154 TRACTATUS V. De (1)Fide, seu De æterna Filii Dei generatione. ; I.
Thence the noble inhabitant was of necessity made visible, because He Himself was about to make the orb of the earth and to visit the human race, being otherwise equal in all things to the Father: for whatever the Father commanded to be made, the Son, inasmuch as He is the power of God and the wisdom of God, accomplished all those things by His marvelous work as soon as it was spoken. Now the inquisitive try to violate this by vain opinions; now the wretches understand that curiosity makes one guilty, not learned. THE FIFTH TRACTATE. On Faith, or on the eternal generation of the Son of God. I.
由此,那高貴的居者必然成為可見的,因為祂自己將要造成大地之球,並要眷顧人類,在其餘各方面凡事都與父同等:因為無論父吩咐什麼當被造成,子既是神的能力、神的智慧,便以祂奇妙的工作,一經言出便成就了那一切。如今那好奇之徒企圖以虛妄的臆見來褻瀆此事;如今那些可憐人才明白:好奇使人有罪,而非使人精通。第五篇講道。論信德,或論神之子的永恆受生。一、
← prev partnext part →
ch. 2 →
12345