📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 文集(CSEL)

米蘭的安波羅修

文集(CSEL) 第 11 章

拉丁文原文.210 節.部分字詞可點開查義

← 第 10 章第 12 章 →
11:1
Noe sancti adorimur uitam mores gesta, altitudinem quoque227 mentis explanare, si possumus. nam cum ipsa philosophia dixerit nihil difficilius quam hominis interiora comprehendere, quanto magis difficile iusti uiri mentem cognoscere? etenim quem dominus deus ad renouandum semen hominum reseruauit, ut esset iustitiae seminarium, dignum est ut nos quoque eum describamus ad imitationem omnium et requiescamus in eo ab omni istius mundi sollicitudine, quam cottidie diuersis exagitationibus sustinemus. pudet filiis superuiuere, taedet. cum tot aduersa audiamus carissimorum, lucem hanc carpere:
我們著手陳述聖人挪亞的生平、品行與作為,並且若能夠,也闡明他心智的崇高。因為哲學本身既已說過,沒有什麼比參透一個人的內心更為困難的,那麼要認識一個義人的心智,豈不更難嗎?實在,主神既為了更新人類的後裔而存留了他,使他成為公義的苗圃,那麼我們也理當把他描繪出來作眾人效法的榜樣,並在他裡面歇下這世界一切的憂慮——就是我們天天在各樣紛擾中所忍受的。比兒女活得更久,乃是羞愧、是厭煩的事。當我們聽見如此多災禍臨到我們至親之人時,再來貪戀這光景就成了苦事:
We undertake to set forth the life, the character, the deeds of holy Noah, and to explain, if we can, the loftiness of his mind as well. For since philosophy itself has said that nothing is more difficult than to comprehend the inner depths of a man, how much more difficult is it to come to know the mind of a righteous man? Indeed, since the Lord God reserved him to renew the seed of mankind, that he might be a seedbed of righteousness, it is fitting that we too should portray him for the imitation of all, and rest in him from all the anxiety of this world, which we daily endure amid diverse agitations. It is a thing of shame, a weariness, to outlive one's children. When we hear of so many adversities befalling those dearest to us, to feed upon this light is irksome:
11:2
ipsarum ecclesiarum diuersos fluctus tempestatesque uel praesentes subire uel recipere animo quis tam fortis ut patienter ferat? et ideo nobis quoque adfectanda haec requies fuit, ut dum Noe sanctum maiore intentione consideramus, reficiamur et nos, sicut omne genus in illo requieuit ab operibus suis atque maestitia. unde et Noe dicitur, quod latine dicitur iustus uel requies. denique et parentes eius dixerunt quia hic nos faciet requiescere ab operibus et a tristitia et a terra, cui maledixit dominus deus. quod utique si ad ea quae facta sunt referendum putes, cum diluuium sub eo factum sit, non requies homiuibus, sed interitus uideatur inlatus nec remissio malorum, sed cumulus miseriarum.
有誰能剛強到甘心忍受、或將諸般教會所遭受的、無論是當前還是將臨的各樣波浪與風暴放在心上呢?所以我們也必須尋求這安息,好叫我們在更專注地默想聖人挪亞之際,自己也得以更新——正如全人類在他裡面從勞苦與愁煩中得了安息。因此他也被稱為挪亞,在拉丁文中譯作「義人」或「安息」。所以他的父母說:「這個兒子必使我們脫離勞苦、愁煩,以及耶和華神所咒詛的土地,得享安息。」然而你若以為這話應指向那些實際發生的事——既然洪水在他手下臨到——那麼似乎臨到人的並非安息,而是毀滅,並非禍患的止息,而是苦難的堆積。
Who is so strong that he could patiently bear to undergo or take to heart the diverse waves and tempests of the very churches, whether present or impending? And so this rest had to be sought by us as well, that while we contemplate holy Noah with greater attention, we too might be refreshed — even as the whole race rested in him from its labors and sorrow. Whence too he is called Noah, which in Latin is rendered 'righteous' or 'rest.' And so his parents said: 'This one shall make us rest from our works and from sorrow and from the earth which the Lord God has cursed.' Yet if you should think this must be referred to the things that came to pass — since the flood occurred under him — it would seem that not rest but destruction was brought upon men, and not a remission of evils but a heaping up of miseries.
11:3
uerum si iusti uiri mentem consideres, aduertes iustitiam solam esse, quae aliis potius nata quam sibi non quod sibi utile est quaerat, sed quod omnibus. haec nos requiescere facit ab operibus iniquitatis, haec reuocat a tristitia, quia dum ea quae iusta sunt gerimus, nihil timemus purae conscientiae securitate, non dolemus dolorem grauem; nihil enim est quod maioris doloris sit quam culpae reatus. requiescamus etiam ab omni cura terrenae conuersationis, quae corpus nostrum atque animam frequentibus uexat doloribus uitamque adterit. Huic uero tres filii nati, Sem Cham Iapheth.
但你若思想這義人的心,便會察覺:唯有公義是為他人而非為自己而生的,它所尋求的不是於己有益的事,乃是於眾人有益的事。正是這公義使我們從罪孽的工作中得安息;正是它把我們從愁煩中召回,因為當我們行公義的事時,我們憑著純潔良心的穩妥便一無懼怕,不受沉重的憂傷——因為沒有什麼比罪咎的譴責更使人憂傷的了。讓我們也從世俗生活的一切掛慮中得安息,那掛慮以頻繁的痛苦折磨我們的身體與靈魂,並消磨我們的生命。這人就生了三個兒子:閃、含、雅弗。
But if you consider the mind of the righteous man, you will perceive that righteousness alone, being born for others rather than for itself, seeks not what is profitable to itself but what is profitable to all. This it is that makes us rest from the works of iniquity; this recalls us from sorrow, because while we do the things that are just, we fear nothing in the security of a pure conscience, we suffer no grievous grief — for there is nothing that is of greater grief than the guilt of fault. Let us rest also from every care of earthly conversation, which harasses our body and soul with frequent pains and wears away our life. To this man, then, were born three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
11:4
quae nomina significant \'bonum\' et (malum) et (indifferens), ut et naturae gratia bonitatem habuisse et malorum ei temptamenta nequaquam defuisse et indifferentibus, hoc est... uelut supellectili uirtutum abundasse uideatur.
這些名字表示「善」、「惡」與「中性之物」,好叫他顯出既因本性的恩賜而擁有良善,又絕非缺少諸惡的試探,並且在中性之物上豐盈有餘——就是說,彷彿擁有德性的一套器具。
These names signify 'good,' 'evil,' and 'indifferent,' so that he may appear both to have possessed goodness by the grace of nature, and by no means to have lacked the temptations of evils, and to have abounded in things indifferent — that is, as it were in a furniture of virtues.
11:5
qua ratione autem malum in medio posuerit, ratio euidens est, quia naturae bonum omnibus inest nec quasi naufragos in lucem proicit, sed et suffulcit uiribus, ut non opprimantur temptamentis malitiae nec tamquam inualidi subcumbant, et munit et uestit uelut quibusdam integumentis indifferentibus, quae sunt salus, ualitudo bona, pulchritudo, inpigritia, diuitiae, gloria, generis claritudo, ut ea dote muniti tueantur bonitatem naturae et malum illud includant, ne possit nocere, et quasi clausum strangulent. nonne cernimus uelut aciem quandam uirtutum ordinatam in proelium, ut inferiores in medio sint, dextra laeuaque uelut in cornibus ualidiores, per quos tota acies robur accipiat?
但他為何把惡置於中間,理由是明顯的:因為本性的善是天生於眾人裡面的,它並不像把遇難者拋進光中那樣對待人,乃是以力量扶持他們,使他們不被惡毒的試探所傾覆,也不像軟弱的人那樣倒下;它又裝備、披覆他們,彷彿用某些中性的覆蓋物——就是健康、康健的精力、美貌、勤奮、財富、榮耀、出身的尊貴——好叫他們既被這稟賦裝備,便能守護本性的良善,把那惡關閉起來,使它不能為害,並彷彿將它囚禁而扼殺之。我們豈不彷彿看見德性的某種戰陣列開預備爭戰,使較弱的居於中央,而在左右兩翼則是較強的,全陣便藉著他們得著力量嗎?
But for what reason he placed evil in the middle, the reason is evident: because the good of nature is innate in all, and does not cast them, as it were shipwrecked, into the light, but also props them up with strength, so that they may not be overwhelmed by the temptations of malice nor sink down as though feeble; and it fortifies and clothes them, as with certain indifferent coverings — which are health, sound vigor, beauty, energy, riches, glory, distinction of birth — so that, fortified by this endowment, they may guard the goodness of nature and shut in that evil, lest it be able to harm, and, as it were imprisoned, may strangle it. Do we not discern, as it were, a certain battle-line of the virtues drawn up for combat, so that the weaker stand in the center, and on the right and left, as on the wings, the stronger, through whom the whole line receives its strength?
11:6
unde et quidam poeta Graecus ait: κακοὺς δ\' εἰς μέσσον ἔλασσεν , hoc est: malos autem in medium inseruit. ita ergo et natura quasi bonus dux imperante deo, quae nos ad huius mundi proelia generari nouerit, quae bona habet primo ordine constituit, quae officiant secundo, quae adiuuent tertio, ut tamquam in medio inclusus hostis geminatis quocumque se contulerit opprimatur uiribus, ne singula eorum uelut aequatis fatigaret proeliis et euadendi de angustiis naturalibus ac serendi latius facultatem haberet.
因此也有一位希臘詩人說:「κακοὺς δ' εἰς μέσσον ἔλασσεν」——就是說:「他卻把惡的驅入中間。」所以本性也像奉神之命行事的良將一樣——這本性深知我們乃是為這世界的爭戰而生——把它所有的善置於頭陣,把妨礙之物置於第二陣,把幫助之物置於第三陣,好叫那仇敵彷彿被困在中央,無論轉向何方都被加倍的兵力所傾覆,免得它彷彿在勢均力敵之下逐一與它們爭戰,將它們耗盡,並得著逃出本性窄路、更廣地擴張自己的機會。
Whence too a certain Greek poet says: 'κακοὺς δ' εἰς μέσσον ἔλασσεν' — that is, 'but he drove the bad into the middle.' So therefore nature also, like a good general acting at God's command — nature which knows that we are born for the battles of this world — sets the goods it has in the first rank, the things that hinder in the second, the things that help in the third, so that the enemy, shut up as it were in the middle, wherever he turns himself may be overwhelmed by doubled forces, lest, fighting them one by one as though on equal terms, he should wear them out and have the means of escaping from the natural straits and of spreading himself more widely.
11:7
Sed quia ubi generantur, hic ordo est, ubi autem generant, Iapheth primo loco scribitur, tertio Cham, ideo ne quis contraria nos posterioribus dixisse arbitretur, etiam illius loci explananda ratio est. bonum quidem quod uelut in quadam naturae nobilitate est praecedit, malum autem sequitur. sunt enim mentis cogitationes contrariae, quae utique oriuntur postea. haec quamdiu uelut intus clausae sunt nec tamquam in herbis germinant, quodam sinu bonae mentis fouentur, ne prodeant.
但既然在它們被生的次序中是這樣的安排,而在它們生育的次序中卻是雅弗列在首位、含列在第三位,所以——免得有人以為我們所說的與後文相矛盾——那段經文的緣由也須加以解釋。善的確彷彿處於本性的某種尊貴之中而居先,惡卻隨後而來。因為心中有相反的念頭,這些念頭無疑是後起的。只要它們彷彿被關閉在內裡,不像嫩草般萌芽,就被善心的某種懷抱所呵護,免得它們出來。
But since, in the order in which they are begotten this is the arrangement, whereas in the order in which they beget Japheth is written in the first place and Ham in the third, therefore — lest anyone suppose we have spoken things contrary to what comes later — the reason of that passage too must be explained. The good indeed, being as it were in a certain nobility of nature, goes before, but evil follows. For there are contrary thoughts of the mind, which doubtless arise afterward. As long as these are, as it were, shut up within and do not sprout up like blades of grass, they are cherished in a certain bosom of the good mind, lest they come forth.
11:8
nam quamdiu in uoluntate est malum, non in entelechia, hoc est in opere atque effectu, bonitas mentis gubernatoris uelut aurigae modo cohibet uel refrenat malitiam temptantem prorumpere, cum uero efferbuerit atque in ulcus eruperit, ne possit latius serpere et finitima contaminare, tunc iusta succedit prouidentia, ne illud indifferens, quod uulgo secundum bonum dicunt, uelut loco cedat, cum iam feruenti malo non possit resistere. itaque ne latius fundat uirus noxium et plurimas inficiat generando corruptiones, illud primum bonum, quod natura bonum est, dum locum mutat, ordinem mutat, ut quasi laboranti cornui opem ferat et eam partem acie suscipiat, quae plus laborat;
因為只要惡尚在意志之中,而不在「圓滿實現」——就是在行為與果效之中——那執掌的心的良善便像御者一般,約束並勒住那企圖爆發的惡毒;但當它沸騰而潰爆成瘡時,為免它更廣地蔓延、污染鄰近之物,那時公義的眷顧便介入,免得那「中性之物」(俗稱次等的善)彷彿從本位退讓,因它已無法抵擋那如今沸騰的惡。於是,為免惡更廣地傾倒它有害的毒液、藉著滋生敗壞而沾染眾多事物,那原本就是善的頭一樣的善,在挪移位置之際便改變其次序,好叫它彷彿援助一個苦戰的側翼,在戰陣中承擔那更為勞苦的部分;
For as long as evil is in the will, not in entelechy — that is, in act and effect — the goodness of the governing mind, after the manner of a charioteer, restrains and reins in the malice that is trying to break forth; but when it has boiled over and burst into an ulcer, lest it be able to creep more widely and contaminate what is adjacent, then just providence steps in, lest that 'indifferent' thing, which is commonly called a secondary good, should as it were give way from its place, when it can no longer resist the now seething evil. And so, lest evil pour forth its noxious venom more widely and infect many things by breeding corruptions, that first good, which is by nature good, while it changes place, changes its order, so that it may bring aid as it were to a struggling flank and take up in the battle-line that part which labors more;
11:9
uirtus enim bellatoris difficilioribus locis est necessaria, sicut etiam boni custodis praesentia ibi frequentior, ubi muri fragiliores. ac ne qua pars sine defensore sit, dum illud bonum inclinatiora sustentat, tunc illud indifferens superiorem locum suscipit uelut deputante sibi eam partem perfectiore bono; nihil enim uirtute perfectius. indifferentia autem non habent robur ualidae uirtutis, sed eius augent et diffundunt gratiam. unde Iapheth dictus est, quod \'latitudo\' significatur latine. Nec. solum sanctus Noe abundauit filiorum generatione, sed etiam uniuersa se effudit eo quam maxime tempore generatio. quod non otiosum uidetur.
因為戰士的勇力在較艱難之處乃是必需的,正如良好衛兵的駐守在城牆較脆弱之處更為頻密。並且為免有任何部分沒有防守者,當那善支撐較傾頹的陣位時,那中性之物便佔據較高的位置,彷彿那更完全的善把那部分分派給它;因為沒有什麼比德性更完全的了。然而中性之物並不具有剛健德性的力量,它們只是增添並擴散德性的恩惠。因此他被稱為雅弗,在拉丁文中表示「寬廣」。不單聖人挪亞在生子上豐盛,連整個人類也尤其在那時候極其繁衍。這似乎並非無故。
for the warrior's valor is needed in the more difficult places, just as the presence of a good guard is more frequent there where the walls are weaker. And lest any part be without a defender, while that good supports the more inclined positions, then that indifferent thing takes up the higher place, as though the more perfect good were assigning that part to it; for nothing is more perfect than virtue. But indifferent things do not have the strength of robust virtue; they only increase and diffuse its grace. Whence he is called Japheth, which in Latin signifies 'breadth.' Nor did holy Noah abound only in the begetting of sons, but the whole human race poured itself forth most abundantly especially at that time. Which does not seem to be without purpose.
11:10
secuturo enim diluuio non debuit aestimari defuisse gratiam fecunditatis illi generationi, quam diluuia absorbuerunt, ut quod fuit humani generis abundantia diuinae deputetur gratiae, quod diluuium secutum est nostris adscribatur iniquitatibus, qui peccatis nostris auertimus domini misericordiam. sic et in posterioribus inuenies quod secuturam Aegypti sterilitatem praecessit totidem annorum fecunditas. principale est enim uirtutis inchoare a beneficiis et praeseminare gratiam. unde et Dauid ait: misericordiam et iudicium cantabo tibi, domine. praecedit beneficii gratia, sequitur censura sobriae disciplinae. diuinum est igitur quod praemittuntur bona, nostrum quod mutantur.
因為洪水既將隨之而來,那被洪水吞滅的世代,就不可被認為缺少了繁衍的恩惠——好叫人類的豐盛歸於神聖的恩典,而隨後的洪水則歸咎於我們的罪孽,就是我們這些以己罪轉離主憐憫的人。同樣在後來的事上,你也會發現,埃及將臨的荒年之前,先有同樣多年的豐收。因為德性的首要之處,乃是以恩惠為開端、預先撒下恩典的種子。因此大衛也說:「主啊,我要向你歌唱慈愛和公平。」恩惠的恩典在先,清醒管教的責備隨後。所以美善之事被預先賜下,乃是出於神;它們被更改,則是出於我們。
For with the flood about to follow, the grace of fruitfulness ought not to be thought to have been wanting to that generation which the floods swallowed up — so that the abundance of the human race may be ascribed to divine grace, while the flood that followed may be charged to our iniquities, we who by our sins turn away the Lord's mercy. So too in later events you will find that the coming sterility of Egypt was preceded by just as many years of fruitfulness. For it is the chief part of virtue to begin with benefits and to sow grace beforehand. Whence David also says: 'Mercy and judgment I will sing to you, O Lord.' The grace of benefit goes before; the censure of sober discipline follows. It is therefore a divine thing that good things are sent in advance; it is ours that they are changed.
11:11
ipse hoc declarat deus dicens: non permanebit spiritus meus in hominibus, quia carnes sunt. spiritus sanctus spiritus sapientiae est, spiritus cognitionis. habet ergo sapientiam:, habet et disciplinam, sicut et de Beseleel, qui sacrum tabernaculum diuino oraculo iussus est facere, ait scriptura quia repletus est spiritu prudentiae et disciplinae. hic ergo spiritus datur hominibus, sed non permanet. qua ratione autem non permaneat causa proditur quia caro sunt; carnis enim natura disciplinae repugnat, quia uoluptati optemperat. denique de solo domino Iesu scriptum est: super quem uideris spiritum descendentem de caelo et manentem super eum, hic est qui baptizat spiritu sancto.
神自己宣告這事,說:「我的靈不永遠住在人裡面,因為他們是屬肉體的。」聖靈乃是智慧的靈、知識的靈。所以祂有智慧,也有教導——正如論到比撒列,他奉神諭被命去建造聖幕,經上說他「被聰明與教導的靈充滿」。這靈固然賜給人,卻不長住。至於它為何不長住,緣由已揭明:因為他們是屬肉體的;因為肉體的本性抵擋教導,既然它順從情慾。最後,唯獨論到主耶穌,經上記著說:「你看見聖靈從天降下,停留在誰的身上,這人就是用聖靈施洗的。」
God himself declares this, saying: 'My spirit shall not remain in men, because they are flesh.' The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of wisdom, the Spirit of knowledge. He has therefore wisdom, he has also discipline — just as concerning Bezalel, who was commanded by the divine oracle to make the sacred tabernacle, Scripture says that 'he was filled with the spirit of prudence and discipline.' This Spirit, then, is given to men, but does not remain. And for what reason it does not remain, the cause is disclosed: because they are flesh; for the nature of the flesh resists discipline, since it submits to pleasure. Finally, of the Lord Jesus alone it is written: 'Upon whom you shall see the Spirit descending from heaven and remaining upon him, this is he who baptizes with the Holy Spirit.'
11:12
in eo enim manebat quem nulla corruptelae carnalis inpedimenta reuocabant, quominus incorruptae et inpermixtae ordinem disciplinae teneret cuius caro non uidit corruptionem. Per unum igitur dominum Iesum salus uentura nationibus declaratur, qui solus non potuit iustus esse, cum generatio omnis erraret, nisi natus ex uirgine generationis obnoxiae priuilegio minime teneretur. ecce inquit in iniquitatibus conceptus sum, et in delictis peperit me mater mea dicit is qui iustus prae ceteris putabatur. quem igitur a iam iustum dixerim nisi horum liberum uinculorum, quem naturae communis uincula non teneant? omnes sub peccato ab Adam, in omnes regnabat mors.
因為那靈停留在祂身上,肉體敗壞的阻礙絲毫沒有把祂拉回,好叫祂持守那不受敗壞、不相混雜的教導之序——祂的肉體並未見朽壞。所以救恩要藉著獨一的主耶穌臨到萬民,這事得以宣告——唯有祂,在世代盡都偏行己路之際,不能不是義的,只因祂由童女所生,絲毫不被有罪後裔的「特權」所轄制。那被視為比眾人更義的人尚且說:「看哪,我是在罪孽裡生的,在我母親懷胎的罪中生下我來。」那麼除了那脫離這些捆鎖、不被共有本性的捆鎖所轄制的那一位以外,我還能稱誰為早已是義的呢?從亞當以來眾人都伏在罪下;死就在眾人身上作了王。
For the Spirit remained in him whom no hindrances of carnal corruption called back, so that he should hold the order of an uncorrupted and unmixed discipline — he whose flesh saw no corruption. Through the one Lord Jesus, therefore, salvation to come to the nations is declared — he who alone could not but be righteous, when every generation went astray, except that, being born of a Virgin, he was by no means held by the privilege of a guilty descent. 'Behold,' says he, 'I was conceived in iniquities, and in sins did my mother bring me forth' — so says one who was reckoned righteous beyond the rest. Whom then should I call already righteous, save him who is free of these bonds, whom the bonds of common nature do not hold? All are under sin from Adam; over all death reigned.
11:13
ueniat solus iustus in conspectu dei, de quo iam non cum exceptione dicatur: non peccauit in labiis suis, sed: peccatum non fecit. . Gigantes autem erant in terra diebus illis. non poetarum more gigantas illos terrae filios uult uideri diuinae scripturae conditor, sed ex angelis et mulieribus generatos adserit quos hoc appellat uocabulo uolens eorum exprimere magnitudinem corporis. et consideremus ne forte gigantum similes sint homines cultu studentes carnis suae, animae autem nullam curam habentes, sicut illi qui de terra secundum poeticam orti fabulam mole corporis sui freti feruntur habuisse contemptum superorum.
願那一位義人來到神面前,論到他如今所說的,不再帶著保留說「他口裡沒有犯罪」,乃是說「他並沒有犯罪」。「那時候地上有偉人。」聖經的作者並不像詩人那樣,要人把那些偉人看作地的兒子,乃是斷言他們是由天使與婦女所生,他用這名稱呼他們,意在表明他們身軀的高大。讓我們思想:那些只用心栽培自己肉體、卻全不顧念靈魂的人,是否或許就像那些偉人——正如詩人寓言中那等從地而生、倚仗自身軀體龐大、據說藐視在上諸神的人。
Let the one righteous man come into the sight of God, of whom it is now said, not with an exception, 'He did not sin with his lips,' but, 'He did no sin.' 'Now there were giants on the earth in those days.' The author of divine Scripture does not, after the manner of the poets, wish those giants to be seen as sons of earth, but asserts that they were begotten of angels and women, whom he calls by this name, wishing to express the great size of their bodies. And let us consider whether perhaps men are like the giants who study the cultivation of their own flesh, but take no care for the soul — like those who, according to the poetic fable, sprung from the earth and relying on the mass of their bodies, are said to have held the gods above in contempt.
11:14
an dispares aestimandi sunt qui, cum ex anima constent ac corpore, mentis uigorem, qua nihil habet anima pretiosius, auersantur et se carnis huius imitatores uelut maternae exhibent stoliditatis heredes? itaque in uanum laborant caelum uotis usurpantes superbis et terrenis operibus incubantes, qui electione inferioris et contemptu superioris consortii tamquam uoluntariis obnoxii peccatis grauiore condemnantur seueritate. plerumque angelos filios dei scriptura uocat, quia ex nullo homine generantur animae. itaque uiros fideles filios suos dicere deus non aspernatus est.
或者,那些雖由靈魂與身體所組成、卻偏離心智之活力的人——靈魂沒有什麼比這活力更寶貴的了——而把自己顯為這肉體的效法者、彷彿母性愚鈍之嗣子的人,難道要被判定為與那些偉人不同嗎?於是他們徒然勞苦,以驕傲的願心僭奪天庭,又孵伏在屬地的工作之上;這等人因揀選了卑下的、藐視了高尚的交通,便以更重的嚴厲被定罪,作為當為自願之罪負責的人。聖經極常稱天使為「神的眾子」,因為他們的靈魂並非由任何人所生。因此神也不以稱有信心的人為祂的兒子為恥。
Or are those to be judged unlike them who, though composed of soul and body, turn away from the vigor of the mind — than which the soul has nothing more precious — and show themselves to be imitators of this flesh, as it were heirs of a maternal dullness? And so they labor in vain, usurping heaven with proud vows and brooding over earthly works; who, by the choice of the lower and the contempt of the higher fellowship, are condemned with the heavier severity, as men liable to voluntary sins. Scripture very often calls angels 'sons of God,' because their souls are begotten of no man. And so God did not disdain to call faithful men his sons.
11:15
sicut ergo uiri probabilis uitae filii uocantur dei, ita quorum carnalia sunt opera hos filios carnis dicimus scripturarum auctoritate. dicit enim Iohannes euangelista quia quotquot Iesum dominum receperunt, dedit iis potestatem filios dei fieri qui credunt in nomen eius, qui non ex sanguinibus neque ex uoluntate carnis neque ex uoluntate uiri, sed ex deo nati sunt.
所以正如那些品行可嘉的人被稱為神的兒子,照樣,那些行為屬乎肉體的人,我們便憑聖經的權柄稱他們為肉體的兒子。因為使徒約翰說:「凡接待主耶穌的,就是信祂名的人,祂就賜他們權柄作神的兒女。這等人不是從血氣生的,不是從情慾生的,也不是從人意生的,乃是從神生的。」
As therefore the men of approved life are called sons of God, so those whose works are carnal we call sons of the flesh, on the authority of the Scriptures. For John the Evangelist says that, 'as many as received the Lord Jesus, to them he gave power to become sons of God, to those who believe in his name, who were born not of bloods, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.'
11:16
ideo postea habes quia iratus est dominus, quoniam quamuis cogitaret, hoc est sciret quia homo in terrae positus regione carnem portans sine peccato esse non possetterra enim uelut quidam temptationum locus est caroque corruptelae inlecebra —, tamen cum haberent mentem rationis capacem uirtutemque animae infusam corpori, sine consideratione aliqua in lapsum ruerunt, ex quo reuocare se nollent. neque enim deus cogitat sicut homines.
因此你在後文便讀到主發怒了,這是因為——雖然祂顧念、就是知道,一個被置於地之境界、身負肉體的人不能無罪(因為地彷彿是試探的某種場所,肉體乃是引人敗壞的誘餌)——他們既有能領悟理性的心智、又有注入身體的靈魂之能力,卻毫無思量地衝向墮落,並且不肯把自己從中召回。因為神並不像人那樣思慮。
Therefore you afterward have it that the Lord was angry, since — although he considered, that is, knew, that a man placed in the region of earth and bearing flesh could not be without sin (for the earth is, as it were, a certain place of temptations, and the flesh is an enticement to corruption) — nevertheless, since they had a mind capable of reason and a power of the soul infused into the body, they rushed without any consideration into a fall, from which they were unwilling to recall themselves. For God does not deliberate as men do.
11:17
ut aliqua ei noua succedat sententia, neque irascitur quasi mutabilis, sed ideo haec leguntur, ut exprimatur peccatorum nostrorum acerbitas, quae diuinitatis meruerit offensam, tamquam eo usque culpa increuerit, ut etiam deus, qui naturaliter non mouetur aut ira aut odio aut passione ulla, prouocatus ad iracundiam uideretur. Minitatus est praeterea quod deleret hominem. ab homine inquit ad pecus et a reptilibus usque ad uolatilia delebo. quid laeserant inrationabilia? sed quia propter hominem illa facta erant, eo utique deleto propter quem facta sunt consequens erat ut etiam illa delerentur, quia non erat qui his uteretur.
彷彿有某種新的決意臨到祂,祂也並非像可變的那樣動怒;倒是這些話被記下,乃是為要表明我們罪孽的苦毒,這罪孽竟至於得罪了神性——彷彿罪咎增長到這樣的地步,以致連那本性上既不被忿怒、也不被仇恨、也不被任何情慾所動的神,也似乎被激動發怒。此外祂還恐嚇說,要除滅人。祂說:「我要將人和牲畜,以及爬行的、直到空中的飛鳥,都除滅。」那些無理性的活物有何過犯呢?只因那些活物原是為人造的,所以那為之被造之人一旦被除滅,理所當然地它們也要被除滅,既然再無人會使用它們。
as though some new resolution should come upon him, nor is he angered as though changeable; rather these things are read so that the bitterness of our sins may be expressed, which has deserved to give offense to the Godhead — as if guilt had grown to such a pitch that even God, who is by nature moved neither by anger nor hatred nor any passion, should seem provoked to wrath. He threatened besides that he would blot out man. 'From man,' he says, 'to cattle, and from the reptiles even to the birds, I will blot out.' What harm had the irrational creatures done? But because those creatures had been made for man's sake, surely once he was blotted out for whose sake they had been made, it followed that they too should be blotted out, since there was no one who would make use of them.
11:18
sensu autem altiore illud manifestatur quia homo mens est, quae est rationis capax; homo enim definitur animal uiuum mortale rationabile. principali igitur extincto etiam sensus omnis pariter extinguitur, eo quod nihil reliqui ad salutem supersit, cum salutis fundamentum uirtus defecerit. ad condemnationem autem ceterorum et ad expressionem pietatis diuinae dicitur Noe apud deum inuenisse gratiam. simul ostenditur quod hominem iustum non obumbret aliorum offensio, quando ipse ad totius reseruatur generis seminarium, qui non generationis nobilitate, sed iustitiae et perfectionis merito laudatur.
但在更深的意義上,這事便顯明出來:人就是心智,是能領悟理性的;因為人被界定為一種活的、必死的、有理性的活物。所以那主要的部分一旦熄滅,一切的知覺也照樣熄滅,因為當救恩的根基——德性——一旦失喪,所存留的便沒有一樣能存到得救。但為了定其餘人的罪,並為表明神聖的虔敬,經上說挪亞在神面前蒙了恩。同時也顯明,別人的過犯並不遮蔽一個義人,既然他自己被存留作全人類的苗圃——這人受稱讚,不是因出身的尊貴,乃是因公義與完全的功德。
But in a deeper sense this is made manifest: that man is mind, which is capable of reason; for man is defined as a living, mortal, rational animal. Therefore, the principal part being extinguished, all sense likewise is extinguished, in that nothing of what remains survives unto salvation, when the foundation of salvation — virtue — has failed. But to the condemnation of the rest and the expression of the divine piety, it is said that Noah found grace before God. At the same time it is shown that another's offense does not overshadow a righteous man, when he himself is reserved as the seedbed of the whole race — he who is praised not for the nobility of his descent but for the merit of his righteousness and perfection.
11:19
probati enim uiri genus uirtutum prosapia est, quia sicut hominum genus homines ita animarum genus uirtutes sunt. etenim familiae hominum splendore generis nobilitantur, animarum autem clarificatur gratia splendore uirtutis. Corrupta est autem terra coram deo et impleta est inquit iniustitia. causa terrenae corruptelae manifesta est, eo quod iniustitia hominum terram corruperit. unde et dominus deus ait: tempus omnis hominis uenit ante me, quia impleta est terra iniquitatibus suis. tempus quidem omnium hominum in conspectu dei et in eius uoluntate est.
因為一個被驗證為可貴之人的譜系,乃是諸德性的世系,既然正如人的種族就是人,照樣靈魂的種族就是諸德性。實在,人的家族因其出身的光彩而顯為尊貴,而靈魂卻因德性的光彩而使恩典得榮。經上說:「世界在神面前敗壞了,遍滿了強暴(不義)。」地之敗壞的緣由是明顯的,乃是人的不義敗壞了地。因此主神也說:「凡有血氣之人的盡頭已經來到我面前,因為地上滿了他們的強暴。」眾人的時候實在是在神眼前、在祂旨意之中。
For the lineage of a man of proved worth is a stock of virtues, since, just as the race of men is men, so the race of souls is the virtues. For indeed the families of men are ennobled by the splendor of their birth, but of souls grace is glorified by the splendor of virtue. 'Now the earth was corrupt before God and filled,' he says, 'with iniquity.' The cause of the earth's corruption is manifest, in that the iniquity of men had corrupted the earth. Whence the Lord God also says: 'The time of every man has come before me, because the earth is filled with their iniquities.' The time, indeed, of all men is in the sight of God and in his will.
11:20
non enim, ut uulgo aiunt, fatale decretum allegatur, sed tamen specialiter hic dictum puto, quia in euangelio suo dominus redempturus hominum genus passione sui corporis et emundaturus sanguine suo sacramentoque baptismatis ait: pater, uenit hora, clarifica filium tuum, ut et filius clarificet te. ergo quia in diluuio per arcam Noe seruatae sunt reliquiae generis humani ad seminarium reparationis et renouationis futurae, ideo praemisit hic: tempus omnis hominis uenit, quia re.pleta est terra iniquitatibus suis. hoc in figura; in ueritate autem ait: reliquiae per dilectionem gratiae saluae factae sunt. ideoque exclamat apostolus dicens: superabundauit peccatum, ut superabundaret gratia.
因為這裡所指的,並不像俗語所說,是什麼宿命的定數;然而我以為這話有特別的意思,因為主在祂的福音書中,將要藉著祂身體的受苦救贖人類、藉著祂的血並洗禮的奧祕潔淨人類,便說:「父啊,時候到了,願你榮耀你的兒子,使兒子也榮耀你。」所以,因為在洪水中,藉著挪亞的方舟,人類的餘剩之民得以保全,作為日後復興與更新的苗圃,他在此便先提說:「凡有血氣之人的盡頭已經來到,因為地上滿了他們的強暴。」這是按預表說的;但按真實,他說:「餘剩之民藉著恩典的慈愛得救。」因此使徒高呼說:「罪在哪裡顯多,恩典就更顯多了。」
For it is not, as the common saying goes, some fatal decree that is alleged here; yet I think this is said in a special sense, because in his Gospel the Lord, about to redeem the human race by the passion of his body and to cleanse it by his blood and by the sacrament of baptism, says: 'Father, the hour is come, glorify your Son, that the Son also may glorify you.' Therefore, because in the flood, through Noah's ark, the remnants of the human race were preserved as a seedbed of future restoration and renewal, he premised here: 'The time of every man has come, because the earth is filled with their iniquities.' This in figure; but in truth he says: 'The remnants are saved through the love of grace.' And therefore the Apostle cries out, saying: 'Sin abounded, that grace might more abound.'
11:21
corrupit inquit omnis caro uiam suam. carnem hic pro homine posuit terreno, in quo carnis inlecebra uiam eius corruperit. qui si intellexisset quod munus accepisset a deo, non utique passus esset ut caro obstaret animae uirtutibus. itaque caro causa fuit corrumpendae etiam animae, quae uelut regio quaedam et locus est uoluptatis, ex qua uelut a fonte prorumpunt concupiscentiarum malarumque passionum flumina lateque exundant. quibus demergitur animae quoddam excusso gubernatore remigium, cum ipsa mens uelut quibusdam tempestatibus et procellis uicta loco suo cedit. pulchre autem ait quia homo uiam naturae suae corrupit.
他說:「凡有血氣的,都敗壞了自己的道路。」此處他以「血氣」指那屬地的人,肉體的誘餌在他裡面敗壞了他的道路。他若明白自己從神所領受的是何等的恩賜,斷不會容讓肉體攔阻靈魂的諸德性。於是肉體也成了靈魂敗壞的緣由——這肉體彷彿是情慾的某種境域與居所,諸般情慾與惡情的江河從中如泉湧般迸發,氾濫四溢。靈魂的划槳之具便被這些江河淹沒,舵手被拋出船外,那時心智本身彷彿被某些風暴狂飆所勝,從本位退讓。他又巧妙地說,人敗壞了自己本性的道路。
'All flesh,' he says, 'had corrupted its way.' Here he put 'flesh' for the earthly man, in whom the enticement of the flesh had corrupted his way. If he had understood what a gift he had received from God, he would surely not have suffered the flesh to obstruct the virtues of the soul. And so the flesh was the cause of the soul's corruption as well — the flesh, which is, as it were, a certain region and seat of pleasure, from which, as from a fountain, the rivers of concupiscences and of evil passions burst forth and flood widely abroad. By these the rowing-tackle of the soul, as it were, is sunk, the helmsman having been thrown overboard, when the mind itself, overcome as though by certain storms and squalls, gives way from its place. And he beautifully says that man corrupted the way of his own nature.
11:22
nam uia sua in paradiso erat in illo beatitudinum tramite, in illo uirtutum flore, in illa incorruptibili gratia, quam uiam terrenis inquinauit uestigiis. alii habent: uiam ipsius, hoc est dei. hoc solet uerbo \'domini\' declarare. Sed iam de ipsa Noe arca dicendum arbitror, quam si qui uelit inpensius considerare, inueniet in eius exaedificatione discriptam humani figuram corporis. quid est enim quod ait deus: fac tibi arcam de quadratis lignis? quadratum certe hoc appellamus, quod omnibus bene consistat partibus et conueniat sibi. itaque et deus auctor nostri corporis naturaeque fabricator adstruitur et opus ipsum perfectum esse his sermonibus significatur.
因為他的道路原在樂園,在那福樂的路徑上,在那德性的花叢中,在那不朽壞的恩典裡——這道路他卻以屬地的腳蹤玷污了。另有抄本作「祂的道路」,就是神的道路。這意思他慣常以「主的」一詞來表明。但如今我想,我們該談談挪亞的方舟本身,誰若願意更專注地思想它,便會發現在它的建造中描繪了人身體的形象。因為神所說的「你要用方木造一隻方舟」是什麼意思呢?我們確然把那在各部分上彼此妥貼相稱、自相一致的稱為「方的」。如此,神既被確立為我們身體的創造者、本性的構造者,這工作本身也藉這些話被表明為完美的。
For his way was in paradise, on that path of blessednesses, in that flower of virtues, in that incorruptible grace — a way which he defiled with earthly footsteps. Others have the reading: 'his way,' that is, God's way. This he is wont to declare by the word 'of the Lord.' But now I think we must speak of the ark of Noah itself, which, if anyone should wish to consider it more attentively, he will find that in its construction there is described the figure of the human body. For what is it that God says: 'Make for yourself an ark of squared timbers'? We surely call that 'squared' which stands well together in all its parts and is consistent with itself. And so both God is established as the author of our body and the fashioner of its nature, and the work itself is signified by these words to be perfect.
11:23
quadrata autem membra hominis esse euidens ratio. si consideres pectus hominis, consideres uentrem pari mensura longitudinis et latitudinis, nisi cum uoluptatibus et epulis uentre distento mensura naturalis exceditur. iam pedes et manus brachia femora et crura quadripertita quis non ipso uisu aduertat? sunt autem pleraque eorum etsi non eiusdem longitudinis aut latitudinis, tamen quae analogiam quandam ita seruent, ut in his quoque congrua mensura ratioque concurrat, longitudo prolixior quam latitudo ait, latitudo quam altitudo. et sicut ligni arcae trina distantia est.
但人的肢體乃是方的,這道理是明顯的。你若觀看人的胸膛,再觀看腹部,長寬乃是同等的尺寸——除非當腹部因享樂與宴飲而脹大,超過了本性的尺度。再者,誰不憑目視就察覺腳與手、臂與股與腿都是四向的呢?然而它們大多縱使長寬並不相同,卻仍保持某種比例,以致在這些之中也有恰當的尺度與比率相合:長比寬更延展,寬又比高更長。並且正如方舟的木料有三重的尺寸。
But that the members of man are squared, the reasoning is evident. If you consider the chest of a man, you consider the belly, of equal measure in length and breadth — except when, the belly distended with pleasures and feasting, the natural measure is exceeded. Again, who would not perceive by the very sight that the feet and hands, the arms and thighs and legs are fourfold? Yet most of them, even if not of the same length or breadth, nevertheless preserve a certain proportion, so that in these too a fitting measure and ratio concur: the length being more extended than the breadth, the breadth more than the height. And just as the timber of the ark has a triple dimension.
11:24
si quidem trecentorum cubitorum longitudinem et quinquaginta <cubitorum> latitudinem et triginta cubitorum altitudinem seruandam esse praescripsit, ita et in nostro corpore summa est et media et minima distantia, summa secundum longitudinem, media secundum latitudinem, minima secundum altitudinem, totum tamen corpus adtextum ex singulis membris quadratum uidetur. nam et usu ita est, ut eos quadratos dicamus, quos nec enormes proceritate et ualidos robusti qualitate corporis aestimamus. quid etiam sibi uelit quod ait: nidos facies in arca nequaquam silendum uidetur.
正如祂吩咐當遵守的長三百肘、寬五十肘、高三十肘,照樣在我們的身體中也有最大、居中與最小的尺寸:最大的按長,居中的按寬,最小的按高;然而整個身體既由各肢體交織而成,便顯為方的。實在,連用法也是如此,我們稱那些既不身量過高、又不身體粗壯結實的人為「勻稱方正的」。並且祂說「你要在方舟裡造一些房(巢)」是什麼意思,這似乎也絕不可默然不提。
Inasmuch as he prescribed that a length of three hundred cubits and a breadth of fifty cubits and a height of thirty cubits should be observed, so also in our body there is a greatest, a middle, and a least dimension: the greatest according to length, the middle according to breadth, the least according to height; yet the whole body, woven together out of its several members, appears squared. For indeed it is even the usage that we call those men 'square-built' whom we judge neither enormous in tallness nor robust in a sturdy quality of body. What, too, that he means by saying, 'You shall make nests in the ark,' seems by no means to be passed over in silence.
11:25
naturaliter enim dictum arbitror eo quod omne corpus nostrum adtextum est sicut nidus, ut spiritus uitalis omnis partes uiscerum penetret atque de principali nostro fundat se per artus singulos. nidi quidam sunt oculi nostri, quibus se uisus inserit. nidi sunt nostrarum sinus aurium, per quos se auditus infundit et uelut in foueam altam deicit. nidus est narium, qui ad se odorem adtrah\'it. nidus est quartus maior ceteris hiatus oris, in quo nutritur donec adolescat sapor et unde uox euolat, in quo latet lingua, quae uelut organum uocis sonos eius artifici suauitate modulatur et, cum sit ipsa inrationabilis, rationabilem uocem exprimit.
因為我以為這話是合乎本性而說的,既然我們的全身彷彿巢一般交織而成,好叫那生命的氣息滲透內臟一切的部分,並從我們的主要器官分流到各個肢體。我們的眼睛彷彿是某些巢,視覺嵌入其中。我們耳朵的窩穴是巢,聽覺藉之灌入,並如同墜入深坑般投進其中。鼻孔是一個巢,把氣味吸引到自己這裡。第四個比其餘更大的巢,是口的張口,味覺在其中得養,直到滋味成熟豐盈,聲音也從中飛出;舌頭藏在其中,它像聲音的樂器,以巧妙的甘美調節聲音,雖本身無理性,卻發出有理性的話語。
For I think it was said in keeping with nature, in that our whole body is woven together like a nest, so that the vital spirit may penetrate all the parts of the inward organs and pour itself from our principal part through the several limbs. Our eyes are, as it were, certain nests, into which sight inserts itself. The hollows of our ears are nests, through which hearing pours itself in and casts itself down as into a deep pit. The nostril is a nest, which draws odor to itself. The fourth nest, greater than the rest, is the opening of the mouth, in which taste is nourished until it grows full, and from which the voice flies forth; in which the tongue lies hidden, which, like an instrument of the voice, modulates its sounds with skillful sweetness and, though itself irrational, produces a rational voice.
11:26
nidus est emicranium, nidus est membrana illa, quae cerebrum fouet et intra se cohibet. nidi sunt uiscera pulmonis et cordis. spiritus quidem nostri, hoc est eius quem carpimus et quo alimur in hac uita, nidus est pulmo, sanguinis autem et spiritus nidus est cor. duo sunt enim eius uteri, unus quo sanguinem uelut quodam sinu suscipit et transfundit in uenas, alter quo rigatus ex illo superiore deducit in arterias iugi meatu. ossa quoque ualidiora nidos habent; sunt enim intus cauata, in quibus foraminibus est medulla. in uisceribus ipsis mollioribus nidi cupiditatis aut doloris sunt. et alia si quis consideret, et plures nidos repperiet in hac fabrica humani corporis.
頭顱是一個巢;那滋養腦髓、把它包閉於內的薄膜是一個巢。肺與心的器官是諸巢。我們氣息的巢——就是我們所吸入、賴以在今生得養的氣息之巢——是肺;而血液與氣息的巢是心。因為它有兩個腔室:一個藉以彷彿在某懷抱中接收血液,再灌注於血脈;另一個被上面那腔室所澆灌,便以不斷的流動把血導入動脈。較堅硬的骨頭也有巢;因為它們內裡是空的,骨髓就在那些空洞中。在較柔軟的內臟本身裡,則有慾望或痛苦的巢。誰若再思想別的,便會在這人身體的構造中找到更多的巢。
A nest is the skull; a nest is that membrane which fosters the brain and holds it shut within itself. Nests are the organs of the lungs and the heart. The nest of our spirit — that is, of the spirit which we draw in and by which we are nourished in this life — is the lung; but the nest of the blood and of the spirit is the heart. For it has two chambers: one by which it receives the blood as it were in a certain bosom and transfuses it into the veins; the other by which, watered from that upper chamber, it conducts it into the arteries in a continuous flow. The stronger bones too have nests; for they are hollowed out within, and in those cavities is the marrow. In the softer inward organs themselves are the nests of desire or of grief. And if anyone should consider other things, he will find still more nests in this fabric of the human body.
11:27
unde puto et illum in psalmo non solum mystice, sed etiam naturaliter dixisse: etenim passer inuenit sibi domum et turtur nidum sibi, ubi reponat pullos suos. est enim iam in hoc corpore nidus pudicitiae, in quo erat nidus inrationabilis concupiscentiae. sed ubi ante partus deformes nutriebat libido, ibi nunc decorae castitatis adolescit hereditas. inlinies inquit eam bitumine. ex multis ossibus neruisque et ceteris aliis constat humanum corpus.
因此我以為,他在詩篇中所說的,不單是奧祕的,也是合乎本性的:「麻雀為自己找著房屋,燕子(斑鳩)為自己找著菢雛之窩。」因為在這身體裡如今有一個貞潔的巢,那從前曾是無理性情慾的巢之處。但在情慾從前養育畸形子嗣之處,如今卻長出端莊貞潔的產業。祂說:「你要在裡外抹上瀝青。」人的身體乃由許多骨頭、筋腱及其餘各樣所構成。
Whence I think that he in the Psalm said, not only mystically but also naturally: 'For the sparrow has found herself a house, and the turtledove a nest for herself, where she may lay her young.' For there is now in this body a nest of chastity, where there was a nest of irrational concupiscence. But where formerly lust nurtured misshapen offspring, there now the inheritance of comely chastity grows up. 'You shall smear it,' he says, 'with bitumen.' The human body consists of many bones and sinews and the rest besides.
11:28
et foris igitur et intus apta conpage conexum sibi adhaeret et habitudine propria, quam €&\'- v Graeci dicunt, tenetur, ut intus clausus spiritus qui infunditur uel spiritalis substantia quae intus operatur ueluti geminis constricta uinculis non euagetur, sed ad unitatem aptam et concinentem conexionemque ualidam cohibeatur. ideo bitumine arca constringi iubetur; est enim bitumen uehementis ad constringendum naturae. unde graece άσφαλτος dicitur ά x ό τής άσφαλείας , hoc est tutamine, quod disiuncta conectat nexuque constringat indissolubili, ita ut naturali unitate sibi credas conuenire. ob hanc causam intus et foris bitumine arca constringitur, ne conexio illa facile rumpatur.
如此,這身體無論在外在內,都由合宜的框架接合,彼此相連,並被它自己的構造所維繫——希臘人稱之為「habitude(體態)」——好叫那被關閉在內裡所注入的氣息,或那在內裡運作的屬靈質素,彷彿被雙重鎖鏈所束,不致游離散逸,乃被約束於合宜而和諧的合一與堅固的相連之中。所以方舟被吩咐要用瀝青緊緊黏合;因為瀝青本性極具黏結之力。因此希臘文稱之為「asphalt(瀝青)」,源於「安全」——即穩固——因為它把分離之物接合,並以不可解之結束緊,以致你會以為這些物件是憑本性的合一相連的。為這緣故,方舟在裡外都用瀝青緊束,免得那相連之處輕易斷裂。
And so, both outside and inside, joined together by a fitting framework, it cleaves to itself and is held by its own constitution — which the Greeks call 'habitude' — so that the spirit shut up within, which is infused, or the spiritual substance which works within, being as it were bound by twin fetters, may not wander abroad, but be confined to a fitting and harmonious unity and a strong interconnection. Therefore the ark is bidden to be bound fast with bitumen; for bitumen is of a nature powerful for binding. Whence in Greek it is called 'asphalt,' from 'safety' — that is, from security — because it joins together what is disjoined and binds it with an indissoluble knot, so that you would think the things came together by a natural unity. For this reason the ark is bound fast with bitumen within and without, lest that interconnection be easily broken.
11:29
Alibi autem, hoc est in Exodo etiam deauratur intus et foris arca illa, quae in sanctis est mundi intellegibilis imitatrix imago. sicut enim pretiosius aurum bitumine ita illa quae in sanctis est arca quam ista praestantior. denique hic simpliciter ligna posuit, ibi autem ligna quidem, sed inputribilia conprehendit declarans merita sanctorum. addidit etiam illic supportatoria immobilia esse, quod sanctorum statio stabilis et firma sit, quia uitae probabilis tramitem uirtutis ductu secuti sunt corruptelae declinantes consortia.
但在別處——就是在出埃及記中——那放在聖所、是可悟之世界摹仿之像的約櫃,也是裡外包金的。因為正如金比瀝青更寶貴,照樣那放在聖所的約櫃也比這方舟更為尊貴。在此處,他只簡單地提到「木料」,但在那裡他確然指明木料,卻是不朽壞的木料,藉以宣告聖徒的功德。他在那裡又補充說,那扛抬的槓是不可移動的,因為聖徒的站立是穩定而堅固的,既然他們在德性的引領下走了可嘉之生命的路徑,躲避了敗壞的交往。
But elsewhere — that is, in Exodus — that ark also is overlaid with gold within and without, the ark which is in the holy place, an imitative image of the intelligible world. For just as gold is more precious than bitumen, so that ark which is in the holy place is more excellent than this one. Here, then, he simply set down 'timbers,' but there indeed he specified timbers, yet incorruptible ones, declaring the merits of the saints. There too he added that the carrying-poles were to be immovable, because the station of the saints is stable and firm, since they followed the path of a praiseworthy life under the guidance of virtue, shunning the fellowships of corruption.
11:30
haec autem arca utpote in diluuio huc atque illuc motu inpellebatur incerto, eo quod peccatorum status mobilis sit et uita eorum quodam redundantium passionum diluuio corruptioni obnoxia errore inconstanti uagetur. nec illud praetereundum, quod cum dixisset: et facies arcam trecentorum cubitorum longitudine et quinquaginta cubitorum latitudine et triginta cubitorum altitudine, addidit:
但這方舟,既在洪水中被不定的動盪驅來逐去,乃是因為罪人的光景是漂泊不定的,他們的生命也易受氾濫情慾之洪水的敗壞,以反覆無常的迷途四處漂流。這一點也不可略過:當祂說了「你要造一隻方舟,長三百肘、寬五十肘、高三十肘」之後,又補充說:
But this ark, inasmuch as it was driven hither and thither by an uncertain motion in the flood, because the condition of sinners is unstable, and their life, liable to corruption by a certain flood of overflowing passions, wanders about with an inconstant straying. Nor is this to be passed over: that when he had said, 'And you shall make an ark of three hundred cubits in length and fifty cubits in breadth and thirty cubits in height,' he added:
11:31
colligens facies arcam et in cubitum consummabis eam a summo, ut reliquo corpori quod mensurae sibi conuenientis ad gratiam decore quadraret caput hominis tanquam regalem arcem adiungeret, ex quo cum sensus omnes ad ceteras partes corporis transfunderentur, tum maxime oculi uelut speculatores et custodes naturae adpositi prouidentia prope totum urbis nostrae statum desuper contuerentur. ipsaque mens illic locata secundum plurimorum sententiam et maxime Solomonis, qui ait:
你要把方舟聚攏起來建造,並要在頂上以一肘把它收成,好叫人的頭顱與身體其餘部分相接——它以與自身相稱的尺度方正成形,作為優美的裝飾,如同一座王室的城堡;從這頭顱中,眾感官既已分流到身體其他部位,而眼睛尤其如同守望者和守衛,被天性以遠見安置在那裏,便能從高處俯察我們這座城幾乎全部的狀況。而心智本身依許多人,尤其是所羅門的意見,正安置於此,他說:
Gathering it together, you shall make the ark and shall finish it to a cubit at the top, so that to the rest of the body it might join, as a fitting adornment, the head of man squared with proportion suited to itself—like a royal citadel; and from this head, while all the senses were poured forth to the other parts of the body, the eyes above all, set as it were like watchmen and guardians appointed by nature with foresight, might survey from on high almost the whole condition of our city. And the mind itself, lodged there according to the opinion of very many, and chiefly of Solomon, who says:
11:32
oculi sapientis in capite eius, quasi in aula imperiali uirtutum concilium sibi contrahat, quo stipata comitatu et ipsa munitior sit et tamquam ex adyto quodam tuenti totius corporis regimen inpertiat <et sciat> responsa proferre, per quae possimus non solum nos ipsos retro respicere nec solum quod ante pedes est uidere, sed etiam caeli ipsius secreta profundo obtutu spectare sapientiae. ibi igitur omnis summa nostrae salutis, ibi gratia: inde custodia, inde etiam pulchritudo corpori toto adquiritur, quae primum in uultu uernat; decet enim praestantiorem esse aulae regalis nitorem, in qua sicut usus maior ita splendor est. ;
「智慧人的眼目在他頭上」——彷彿在一座帝王的殿堂中,它為自己召聚一個諸德的議會,好叫它被這樣的隨從簇擁,自身更得堅固,並如從某內殿中守護全身,施行統治,又懂得發出應答,藉此我們不僅能回顧自身,也不僅看見腳前之事,更能以智慧深邃的默觀仰望諸天本身的奧祕。因此,我們救恩的全部總綱在那裏,恩典在那裏;保護由此而來,全身的美麗也由此而得,這美首先在面容上綻放。因為王室殿堂的光彩理當更為卓越,因在其中用途既大,光輝也越大。
'The eyes of the wise man are in his head'—as though in an imperial hall it gathers to itself a council of virtues, so that, surrounded by such a retinue, it may itself be more securely fortified, and as from some inner sanctuary may impart governance to the whole body, watching over it, and may know how to deliver responses, by which we are able not only to look back upon ourselves, nor only to see what lies before our feet, but even to gaze with the deep contemplation of wisdom upon the very secrets of heaven. There, then, is the whole sum of our salvation; there is grace; thence comes protection; thence too beauty is acquired for the whole body, which first blossoms in the countenance. For it is fitting that the splendor of the royal hall be more excellent, since in it, as the use is greater, so is the brilliance.
11:33
Namque si spectes singnla quae in hominis forma ad usum aliquem composita uidentur, ut oculi ad uidendum, aures ad audiendum, nares ad odorandum, os ad loquendum, ita usus ministrant, ut praestent decorem. quam deformes sunt uultus caecorum! et quid mirum si uultus hominis sine oculis deformis est, quando ipsum caelum sine sole non habet suum decorem? tristes sine sole dies ducimus, noctes sine luna non placent; ipsi enim sunt quidam mundi oculi. detrahe stellarum lumina, et quaedam est in caelo ipso caecitatis deformitas.
因為若你逐一察看人的形體中那些看似為某用途而安排的部分——如眼為看,耳為聽,鼻為嗅,口為說——它們既盡其職用,也賦予美觀。瞎子的面容是何等難看!人臉沒有眼睛而醜陋,又有何奇?既然連天空沒有太陽也失其美麗。我們無太陽便度過慘淡的白日,無月亮的夜晚也不討我們喜歡;因為這些彷彿是世界的眼睛。除去眾星的光,連天空本身也有一種失明的醜陋。
For if you consider one by one the things that in man's form appear arranged for some use—as the eyes for seeing, the ears for hearing, the nostrils for smelling, the mouth for speaking—they so serve their function that they furnish beauty as well. How disfigured are the faces of the blind! And what wonder if a man's countenance without eyes is unsightly, when the very heaven without the sun has not its own beauty? We pass our days dismally without the sun; nights without the moon do not please us; for these are, as it were, certain eyes of the world. Take away the light of the stars, and there is in heaven itself a certain disfigurement of blindness.
11:34
pili ipsi, qui orbem oculorum praetexunt et uelut quadam acie praetendunt, ne sorde aliqua et pulueris caligine pupilla laedatur, et ipsi excipiunt, si quid fuerit inlatum quod oculum possit laedere, si lippitudine intercidant, quam dedecet, si palpebra contractior fuerit, si radantur supercilia, quae pretiosorum monilium specie uelut intexta gemmis refulgent. aurium quoque ut necessarius usus ita decora species, quas si qui truncauerit, toti uultui inferet deformitatem. in quibus ita elaborauit opus suum natura, ut ipsi anfractus cauernarum mira prouidentia sinuati plurimum utilitatis adierant, ne repente feriat secreta capitis sonus.
那些睫毛圍繞著眼眶,如某種前哨般伸展出來,免得瞳孔被污穢或塵埃的霧氣所傷;它們本身也攔截任何被帶向眼睛、能傷害它的東西;倘若它們因發炎而脫落,那是何等難看;倘若眼瞼過於緊縮;倘若眉毛被刮去——那眉毛閃耀如貴重項鍊的模樣,彷彿綴滿寶石。耳朵的用途既屬必要,外觀也屬秀美;若有人割傷它們,便會給整張臉帶來醜陋。在這些器官上,天性如此巧造其工,使那些孔穴的迴旋以奇妙的遠見彎曲成形,帶來極大的益處,免得聲音突然衝擊頭部隱密的內室。
The very lashes, which fringe the orb of the eyes and are stretched out like a kind of vanguard, lest the pupil be harmed by any filth or cloud of dust, themselves also intercept anything that might be brought against it which could injure the eye; if they fail through inflammation, how unsightly that is; if the eyelid is drawn too tight; if the eyebrows are shaved away—those brows which gleam like the appearance of precious necklaces, as though inwoven with gems. Of the ears too the use is as necessary as the appearance is comely; and if anyone should mutilate them, he will bring disfigurement upon the whole face. In these nature so wrought her work that the very windings of the cavities, curved with wondrous foresight, brought much utility, lest sound suddenly strike the secret chambers of the head.
11:35
denique saepe multos inprouiso clangore consternari uidemus et adtonitos aut uocis alicuius aut tumultus sono expauescere. sordes ipsae, quae intra eosdem gignuntur amfractus, uelut quodam glutino auditum ligant. simul si uehementior pulsus fuerit alicuius sonitus, infringitur ac retardatur, ut praenuntiatus potius mulceat quam inprouisus interna concutiat. uermiculi quoque si aurem penetrare temptauerint, quodam sordium uisco tenentur. nares simae contra naturam uidentur. iam si incisae fuerint, quomodo potest uita subsistere sublato spirandi meatu? quemadmodum pecudis magis facies quam uultus hominis aestimatur!
總之,我們常見許多人被突如其來的喧鬧所驚擾,受驚而為某聲音或騷動的聲響所懼怕。那在同樣的孔穴內所生成的耳垢,如某種膠水般束縛聽覺。同樣,若某聲響的衝擊過於猛烈,它便被削弱、被遲緩,使之先被預告,因而撫慰人,而非趁不備衝擊內部。小蟲若試圖鑽入耳中,也被某種耳垢的黏膠所黏住。塌鼻看似違反自然;但若把它們切去,當呼吸的通道被除掉,生命又怎能維持?那情形便如將其當作牲畜的臉,而非人的面容!
In short, we often see many people thrown into confusion by a sudden clamor, and, struck with alarm, terrified by the sound of some voice or uproar. The very wax that is generated within those same windings binds the hearing as with a kind of glue. Likewise, if any sound's impact be too violent, it is broken and slowed, so that, being announced beforehand, it rather soothes than, coming unawares, shakes the inner parts. Little worms too, if they attempt to penetrate the ear, are held fast by a kind of birdlime of wax. Flat noses seem contrary to nature; but if they were cut away, how could life subsist when the passage of breathing was removed? In what manner the face of a beast is reckoned rather than the countenance of a man!
11:36
capilli capitis quam grato amictu caput uestiunt uelut quidam aulae regiae stipatores, ne cerebrum aura laedat aut imber feriat aut sol adurat. quos ita tamen redit natura, ut et pro sexu aut prolixiores placeant aut recisi et pro aetate aut plerumque pro temporis et anni qualitate. in senibus grata canities, in pueris prodigiosa; aestate delectat tonderi pressius, hieme indulgentius; mulieribus ornamento est coma, dedecori est uiris. denique apostolus hoc euidentius expressit dicens: nec ipsa natura docet uos quod uir quidem si comam habeat, ignominia est illi, mulier uero si capillos habeat, gloria est illi?
頭髮以何等可喜的覆蓋衣著頭顱,如同王室宮廷的某些侍從,免得空氣傷害腦髓,或雨水擊打它,或太陽灼烤它。然而天性如此安排它們,使之依性別或以較長、或以剪短為宜;又依年齡,且多半依季節與年份的性質。在老人身上白髮可喜,在孩童身上卻是怪異;夏天樂於剪得較短,冬天則寬鬆些;對婦女頭髮是裝飾,對男子卻是羞恥。簡言之,使徒把這點說得更明白,他說:「你們的本性不是也教導你們:男人若有長頭髮,便是他的羞辱;女人若有長頭髮,便是她的榮耀嗎?」
With how welcome a covering do the hairs of the head clothe the head, like certain attendants of a royal court, lest the air harm the brain, or rain strike it, or the sun scorch it. Yet nature so renders them that, according to sex, they please either longer or cut short; and according to age, and for the most part according to the quality of the season and the year. In old men gray hair is welcome, in boys it is monstrous; in summer it delights to be cropped closer, in winter more indulgently; to women the hair is an ornament, to men a disgrace. In short, the Apostle expressed this more plainly, saying: 'Does not nature itself teach you that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame to him; but if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her?'
11:37
quid de ipsa regia loquar, per quam aulici sermones prodeunt, quidam mentis nostrae indices animique internuntii r quid de ipso dentium ordine, qui cum suo opere toti corpori quidem uires ministrent, tum etiam modulatores sunt uocis ipsius? de quibus si qui ceciderit, uox claudicat. haec de capite prolixius diximus, quia oportuit sensus omnes in summo locari, unde omnia per reliquas partes officia diuiderentur. capiti autem nostro a tergo ceruix proxima, dextra laeuaque bracchia sunt, quae arcem imperialem tamquam fida tuentur custodia, denique haec in nobis ualidiora\' quae propiora capiti sunt, haec praestantiora.
我又該如何論及那王室的城門本身——就是口——廷臣的言語由此而出,乃是我們心智的某種標記和心靈的傳信者?又該如何論及那一排牙齒,它們以自身的工作向全身供給力量,並且還是聲音本身的調節者?這些牙齒中若有一顆掉落,聲音便會跛行。這些關於頭部的事我們說得較長,因為理當把一切感官安置在最高處,好叫一切職能由此分配到其餘的部分。而緊接我們頭部之後的是頸項;左右是雙臂,它們如忠信的衛兵守護帝王的城堡;最後,在我們身上那些更靠近頭部的部位較為強壯——它們是更卓越的。
What shall I say of that very royal gate itself—the mouth—through which the courtly words come forth, certain indices of our mind and intermediaries of the soul? What of the very row of the teeth, which by their own work indeed furnish strength to the whole body, and are besides the modulators of the voice itself? Of these, if any one fall out, the voice limps. These things we have said about the head at greater length, because it was fitting that all the senses be placed at the summit, whence all the offices might be distributed through the remaining parts. But next to our head, behind, is the neck; on the right and left are the arms, which guard the imperial citadel like a faithful watch; and lastly, in us those parts are the stronger which are nearer the head—these are the more excellent.
11:38
pectus quoque uelut quoddam sacrarium sapientiae et stomachus uelut quidam testis, ut medici aiunt, et conscius secretorum capitis conpassionisque consors, cui sua omnia uel salubria uel aduersa transfundat. latera naticae femora et crura mensurae latitudinem ipsa specie significant pedumque gressus, qui etsi exsiliores uidentur, fiunt tamen cum incedimus latiores. Pulchre autem addidit: ostium ex transuerso facies, eam partem declarans corporis, per quam superflua ciborum egerere consueuimus, ut quae putamus ignobiliora esse corporis, his honorem abundantiorem circumdaret. quod multo gratius scriptura expressit quam Socrates in libro Platonis dixisse legitur.
胸膛也彷彿是智慧的某座聖所;而胃,正如醫師所言,乃是頭部祕密的某種見證者和知情者,是它同感的夥伴,頭部把自己一切無論有益或有害之事都傾注於它。兩脅、臀部、大腿和小腿,以其外觀本身標示尺度的寬度,腳步亦然——雙腳雖看似較細,行走時卻變得較寬。再者,祂優美地補充說:「你要在旁邊造一道門」,藉此指明身體那部位,就是我們慣於排出食物剩餘之物的地方,好叫祂以更豐盛的尊榮環繞我們認為身體中較卑賤的部分。這一點聖經所表達的,遠比柏拉圖書中所記蘇格拉底所說的更為優雅。
The breast too is, as it were, a certain sanctuary of wisdom; and the stomach is, as the physicians say, a kind of witness and confidant of the head's secrets, a partner of its sympathy, to which the head transfuses all its own affairs, whether wholesome or adverse. The sides, the buttocks, the thighs, and the legs signify by their very appearance the breadth of measure, as does the tread of the feet, which, although they seem rather slender, yet become broader when we walk. Beautifully, moreover, He added: 'You shall make a door on the side,' declaring that part of the body through which we are wont to discharge the superfluities of food, so that He might surround with more abundant honor those parts of the body which we deem more ignoble. This Scripture expressed far more gracefully than Socrates is read to have said in the book of Plato.
11:39
nam cum istud in Moysi scriptis siue ipse Socrates siue Plato, qui in Aegypto fuit, potuerit uel legere uel ab iis percipere qui legerant, decoro motus inuento ostium sibi apertum putauit, ut operatoris nostri consilium praedicaret laudans eo quod id potissimum decoro conuenerit, ut ductus quosdam atque exitus cuniculorum nostrorum a tergo auerteret, ne in purgationibus uentris conspectus noster offenderetur. at uero apostolus quae uidentur inquit membra corporis infirmiora esse necessaria sunt, uno ac simplici uerbo descriptiones philosophiae supergressus, et quae putamus ignobiliora esse membra corporis.
因為既然蘇格拉底本人,或曾在埃及的柏拉圖,能在摩西的著作中讀到這點,或從讀過這些著作的人那裏領會,他便因這秀美的構想而感動,以為有一道門向他敞開,好叫他宣揚我們造物主的設計,並在這點上稱讚祂:把我們管道的某些導管和出口轉向後方、避開視線,最合乎合宜之道,免得在腸胃的清瀉中我們的目光受冒犯。但使徒說:「身上肢體那看似較軟弱的,更是不可少的」,以一個樸實的詞超越了哲學的種種描述;又說:「身上肢體那我們看為較不體面的,」
For since either Socrates himself, or Plato—who was in Egypt—could have read this in the writings of Moses, or have learned it from those who had read them, moved by the comely device, he thought that a door had been opened to him, so that he might proclaim the design of our Maker, praising Him in this, that it best suited propriety to turn away from sight, toward the rear, certain ducts and outlets of our channels, lest in the cleansings of the belly our gaze be offended. But the Apostle says: 'Those members of the body which seem to be the weaker are necessary,' with one simple word surpassing the descriptions of philosophy; and 'those members of the body which we think to be more ignoble,'
11:40
his honorem abundantiorem circumdamus, et quae inhonesta sunt nostra honestatem abundantiorem habent. sobrietatis enim nostrae et temperantiae indicium praecipue illic cognoscitur; helluones enim aut distenduntur cruditatibus usque ad periculum aut plerumque soluuntur uisceribus exinanitis. quod pulchre etiam ad ecclesiae membra apostolus rettulit. quae enim inhonesta sunt nostra ac superflua nisi luxuria, nisi lasciuia?
「就給這些加上更豐盛的體面;我們不俊美的部分,反得更豐盛的俊美。」因為正是在那裏,我們的節制與自持的證據被認出;因為貪食的人或被飽食脹滿以致危險,或多半在腸腹被掏空時崩潰。這點使徒也優美地應用到教會的肢體上。因為我們不俊美而多餘的,若不是奢侈,若不是放縱,又是甚麼呢?
'we bestow on these more abundant honor; and our uncomely parts have more abundant comeliness.' For it is chiefly there that the proof of our sobriety and temperance is recognized; for gluttons are either distended by surfeits even to peril, or for the most part collapse when their bowels are emptied out. This too the Apostle beautifully applied to the members of the Church. For what are our uncomely and superfluous things, if not extravagance, if not wantonness?
11:41
quibus si quis iuuentae inretitus tempore, cum ad maturiorem aetatem processerit, ueniat ad baptismum, renuntiet superioribus moresque priores exuat, peccata deponat, consepeliatur cum domino Iesu, crucifigatur ei mundus et ipse mundo, nonne is peccatorum remissione donatus abundantiorem honestatem habet quam ille catechumenus, cuius uita innocentior aestimabatur? et ut apostoli ipsius exemplo utamur, Iudaeus erat, persecutor erat: uocatus ad gratiam Christi coepit esse apostolus. et quia plus ei dimissum est, plus diligere coepit, abundantius apostolis omnibus laborare, uas electionis factus, doctor gentium missus.
倘若有人在青年時被這些事所纏縛,及至年歲較長,來受洗,棄絕從前的行徑,脫去舊有的習氣,放下罪惡,與主耶穌同埋葬,使世界向他釘十字架、他也向世界釘十字架——他既蒙赦罪,豈不比那生活被算為較無辜的慕道者,得著更豐盛的俊美嗎?且以使徒本人為例:他曾是猶太人,曾是逼迫者;蒙召歸於基督的恩典,便開始作使徒。因為他多得了赦免,便開始多愛,比眾使徒更豐盛地勞苦,成為蒙揀選的器皿,被差遣作外邦人的教師。
And if anyone, ensnared by these in the time of youth, should, when he has advanced to a more mature age, come to baptism, renounce his former ways, put off his prior manners, lay aside his sins, be buried together with the Lord Jesus, and have the world crucified to him and himself to the world—is he not, being granted the remission of sins, possessed of a more abundant comeliness than that catechumen whose life was reckoned more innocent? And to use the example of the Apostle himself: he was a Jew, he was a persecutor; called to the grace of Christ, he began to be an apostle. And because more was forgiven him, he began to love more, to labor more abundantly than all the apostles, made a vessel of election, sent as the teacher of the Gentiles.
11:42
nonne etiam apostolorum ipsorum plurimis uberiorem et honestiorem consecutus est. gloriam, qui ante et inhonestus et ingloriosus erat, cum persequeretur ecclesiam dei? pauper iste, debilis in ecclesia ipse te redemit suis uotis. et ut maiora aperiamus mysteria, quid tam ignobile quam gentilis populus? pauper, utpote qui nulla haberet eloquia dei, debilis et utroque pede claudus, qui nec in legem nec in euangelium credidisset, uocatus tamen credidit et baptizatus accepit gratiam. itaque quia plus ei dimissum est, plus diligit. remansit Iudaeorum populus, licet uno pede claudus, quamquam et in ipsa lege claudicet.
他豈不也得著了比眾使徒中極多人更豐富、更榮耀的榮耀嗎?他從前在逼迫神的教會時,本是既不體面又無榮耀的。教會中這貧窮軟弱的人,竟以他的禱告救贖了你。再者,要開啟更大的奧祕:有甚麼像外邦人那樣卑賤呢?他們貧窮,因毫無神的聖言;軟弱,且兩腳都瘸,因他們既不信律法,也不信福音;然而蒙召便信了,受洗便領受了恩典。因此,他們既多得赦免,便多愛。猶太人卻留下,誠然一腳瘸了,雖然他們連在律法本身上也跛行。
Did he not also obtain a richer and more honorable glory than very many of the apostles themselves—he who before was both dishonorable and inglorious, when he persecuted the Church of God? This poor and feeble one in the Church has himself redeemed you by his prayers. And, to open up greater mysteries: what is so ignoble as the Gentile people? Poor, inasmuch as it had no oracles of God; feeble and lame in both feet, since it had believed neither in the Law nor in the Gospel; yet, being called, it believed, and being baptized, received grace. Therefore, because more was forgiven it, it loves more. The people of the Jews remained, lame indeed in one foot, although it limps even in the Law itself.
11:43
itaque ille, qui gloriosissimus habebatur, amisit omnia, mirabilem consiliarium et prudentem architectum et sapientem auditorem, iste, qui ignobilis erat, adeptus omnia fidei titulo, tropaeo martyrum, angelorum gloriatur consortio. ergo Plato quod potuit sermonis nitorem adhibuit, apostolus autem, qui habebat dei spiritum, reuelauit mysterium. satis dictum de ostio, quoniam qui retro erant priores facti sunt. Nunc illud quaeramus, quid sit quod dixerit dominus: inferiora arcae bicamerata et tricamerata facies. inferiora quidem dicendo aduertimus quod pulchre sentire nos uoluerit inferiore loco aestimanda ciborum receptacula, hoc est ea uiscera, quae acceptum conficiunt cibum.
如此,那被視為最榮耀的便失去了一切——奇妙的策士、精明的工師、智慧的聽者;而那卑賤的,因信德之名得著了一切,便以殉道者的凱旋紀念、以天使的交契而誇耀。所以柏拉圖用了他所能用的言辭的光彩;但使徒既有神的靈,便揭示了奧祕。關於那門已說得夠了,因為在後的已成了在前的。如今讓我們探究這點:主所說「你要把方舟的下層造成兩層和三層」是何意?祂說「下層」,我們的確領會祂優美地願我們明白:食物的容器當被算在較低的位置——就是那些消化所領受食物的內臟。
And so he who was held most glorious lost everything—the wonderful Counselor, the prudent Architect, and the wise Hearer; while he who was ignoble, having gained everything by the title of faith, glories in the trophy of the martyrs and the fellowship of the angels. Therefore Plato applied what brilliance of speech he could; but the Apostle, who had the Spirit of God, revealed the mystery. Enough has been said about the door, since those who were behind have become first. Now let us inquire into this: what is the meaning of what the Lord said: 'You shall make the lower parts of the ark with two chambers and with three chambers'? By saying 'the lower parts,' indeed, we perceive that He beautifully willed us to understand that the receptacles of food are to be reckoned in a lower place—that is, those bowels which work up the food received.
11:44
corruptibilis enim esca est, quod autem corruptibile non superioribus conparandum, sed inferioribus. simul quia deorsum cibus fertur, cuius exigua portio uiribus corporis alimoniaeque proficit, reliqua pars aluo purganda deducitur, quia intestina sunt, per quae descendunt ciborum superflua, ita operator noster instituit, ut non extenta a stomacho ad imum, sed insinuata sint ac reflexa, quo uitae nostrae usus propagaretur. nam si extenderentur intestina hominis, quae suscipiunt et deducunt cibum, statim sine ulla pertransiret mora et necesse esset iugiter esurire nos, iugiter epulari aut desistente alimentorum substantia deficere ilico.
因為食物是會朽壞的,而會朽壞的不該與較高之物相比,乃與較低之物相比。同樣,因食物是向下運送的——其中少許部分有益於身體的力量與營養,其餘部分則被引出由腹中清瀉,因為有腸子,食物的剩餘之物經其下行——我們的造物主便如此安排,使腸子不從胃直伸到底部,乃是盤繞折返,藉此我們生命的用度得以延長。因為人的腸子若是直伸的——就是那接受並輸送食物的腸子——食物便立刻毫不停留地通過,我們就必不斷飢餓、不斷進食,或在營養的物質告罄時當下昏厥。
For food is corruptible, and what is corruptible is not to be compared with the higher things, but with the lower. Likewise, because the food is carried downward—of which a small portion profits the strength of the body and its nourishment, while the remaining part is led off to be purged from the belly, since there are intestines through which the superfluities of food descend—our Maker so arranged it that they should be not extended straight from the stomach to the bottom, but folded in and bent back, whereby the use of our life might be prolonged. For if the intestines of man, which receive and lead off the food, were extended straight, it would at once pass through without any delay, and it would be necessary for us to be perpetually hungry, perpetually feasting, or, when the substance of nourishment failed, to faint on the spot.
11:45
nunc autem in illa intestinorum reflexione ac sinuatione bipertita ac tripertita haeret cibus et descendendo paulatim uires ministrat, sucum infundit corpori, tenet satietatem, differt edendi appetentiam, nec subita effusio ac repentina euacuatio est nec inexplebilis adpetentia est nec insatiabilis epulandi libido. primum ergo indigentia esset et fames, deinde ex bis sequeretur edendi sine intermissione conti ouatio. quid autem deformius quam semper uentri studere, qui cum repletur uacuandus est, cum uacuatur replendus? tertium quid superat nisi mors inter ipsos cibos epulasque permixta?
但如今,在腸子那雙重和三重的折返與盤繞中,食物便停留,並隨著漸漸下行而供給力量,把汁液注入身體,維持飽足,延遲進食的食慾;既無突然的傾瀉與驟然的排空,也無貪得無厭的食慾,更無永不滿足的飲宴情慾。因為起初本會有匱乏與飢餓;然後由此會接連不斷、毫無間歇地進食。但有甚麼比總是專注於肚腹更難看呢?這肚腹既被填滿就須清空,既被清空又須填滿。除了死亡夾雜在飲食筵席之間,還剩下甚麼第三樣呢?
But now, in that folding and winding of the intestines, twofold and threefold, the food lingers, and as it descends little by little it furnishes strength, infuses juice into the body, sustains satiety, defers the appetite for eating; and there is neither a sudden outpouring and abrupt evacuation, nor an insatiable appetite, nor an unappeasable craving for feasting. For first there would be want and hunger; then from these would follow continual eating without intermission. But what is more unsightly than always to be devoted to the belly, which, when it is filled, must be emptied, and when it is emptied, must be filled? What third thing remains except death intermingled amid the very foods and feasts?
11:46
quomodo enim poterant diutius uitam producere simul edentes et esurientes, bibentes sitientesque et priusquam replerentur exinanientes omne quod sumpserant statimque esurientes? nunc autem dum paulatim descendit esca, famem et cruditatem naturalis temperat prouidentia. primum enim in stomacho, quem plerique uentrem appellant superiorem, conficitur cibus, deinde coquitur in iecore atque eo uapore digeritur. sucus eius diuiditur certis uiscerum portionibus, ex quo omne corpus ualescit. quod satis iuniorum incrementa, senum testificatur perseuerantia.
因為他們既一面吃一面餓、一面喝一面渴,又在未飽足之前就把所攝取的全傾倒出來、隨即又餓,怎能再延長他們的生命呢?但如今,當食物漸漸下行,自然的天意便調節飢餓與消化不良。因為首先在胃裏——多數人稱之為上腹——食物被消化;然後在肝裏被烹煮,並藉其熱氣被分解。其汁液被分配到內臟的某些部分,全身由此得以強壯。年輕人的成長與年老者的維持,便是這事充分的見證。
For how could they prolong their life any longer, eating and hungering at once, drinking and thirsting, and, before they were filled, emptying out all that they had taken in, and straightway hungering? But now, while the food descends little by little, natural providence tempers hunger and indigestion. For first, in the stomach—which most people call the upper belly—the food is worked up; then it is cooked in the liver and digested by its heat. Its juice is distributed to certain portions of the bowels, from which the whole body grows strong. To this the growth of the young bears sufficient witness, and the perseverance of the old.
11:47
reliquum cibi in uentrem defluit, quem omnes uentrem appellamus sine adiectione, plerique uentrem dicunt inferiorem, ex quo fimus necesse est, qui plenus iam corruptionis descenderat, egeratur per illud ex transuerso ostium. Haec cum ita fabre naturali institutione ad dei praeceptionem composita uidentur, tamen nisi a nobis edendi agendique mensura seruetur, tamquam exuberantibus passionibus generatur diluuium et quaedam totius labes corporis; intemperantia enim accendit libidinem, cruditatem generat, corruptelam creat.
食物的餘剩之物流下到腹中——就是我們眾人不加修飾單稱為「腹」的,多數人稱之為下腹——由此必然產生穢物,這穢物既已下行、滿了腐敗,便經那旁邊的門排出。雖然這些事看似按神的訓示、藉自然的安排如此巧妙地配置,然而,除非我們守住飲食與行為的節度,否則彷彿從泛濫的情慾中便生出一場洪水和全身的某種敗壞;因為無度激起情慾,生出消化不良,造成腐壞。
The remainder of the food flows down into the belly—which we all call the belly without addition, and which most people call the lower belly—from which there must necessarily be excrement, which, having descended already full of corruption, is discharged through that door on the side. Although these things appear so skillfully arranged by natural ordinance according to God's precept, yet, unless a measure of eating and acting be kept by us, a deluge is generated, as it were, from overflowing passions, and a certain ruin of the whole body; for intemperance kindles lust, generates indigestion, creates corruption.
11:48
itaque aut duritie interna tenduntur et quatiuntur doloribus aut incocto ciborum umore et indigestionis asperitate interior quidam intestinorum amictus raditur, quia uelut chartae specie geminus eorum amictus adseritur: unus exterior, quem continuum aiunt periti uel qui curiosius scrutati sunt, a summo ad imum directus, alius interior tamquam lateribus adtextus, unde aiunt non totum solui cum raditur; nam si continuus esset interior, inmedicabilis scissura eius foret. illic per moram adiunctionum adhaerere ciborum reliquias; quae si adiunctiones soluantur, transire semesos cibos et potus defluos. hoc est hominis diluuium.
如此,腸子或因內裏的硬結而緊繃、為疼痛所震動,或因食物未消化的濕氣與消化不良的粗糙,腸子內部的某層膜被刮損,因為據說它們的膜是雙層的,像紙的模樣:一層在外,內行人——或那些較細心考究的人——稱之為連續的,從上到下貫通;另一層在內,彷彿附著於兩側,因此他們說它被刮時不致全部潰散;因為內層若是連續的,其裂傷便無法醫治。在那裏,食物的殘餘藉著接合處的緩慢而黏附;若這些接合處潰散,半消化的食物便通過,飲液也流下。這就是人的洪水。
And so either they are strained by internal hardness and shaken with pains, or, through the undigested moisture of foods and the harshness of indigestion, a certain inner lining of the intestines is scraped away, since their lining is asserted to be twofold, like the appearance of paper: one outer, which the experts—or those who have examined more curiously—call continuous, directed from top to bottom; the other inner, attached as it were to the sides, whence they say it is not wholly dissolved when it is scraped; for if the inner were continuous, its tearing would be incurable. There, through the slowness of the junctions, the remnants of foods adhere; and if these junctions be dissolved, the half-eaten foods pass through and the drinks flow down. This is the deluge of man.
11:49
unde mihi uidetur per arcae huius figuram uoluisse deum nos edocere quemadmodum ab hoc speciali tuti simus diluuio. corruptela enim diluuii causa est. ea ubi inrepserit, aperiuntur aquae, ebulliunt omnes fontes cupiditatum, ut totum corpus tanto et tam profundo uitiorum profluuio mergatur. nihil est enim quod tam miserae seruituti subiciat hominem quam libido atque eiusmodi cupiditates, quae iugo quodam criminum graui deprimunt miseram conscientiam, ut se nequeat adtollere, utpote quae innocentiae libertatem amiserit. maximum ergo iri hoc diluuio remedium, ut iustum praeferas eumque mandati caelestis exsecutorem eligas.
由此我覺得,神藉這方舟的表象願意教導我們,如何能安然脫離這特殊的洪水。因為腐敗是洪水的原因。當它一旦悄然侵入,眾水便裂開,一切慾望的泉源都湧出,使全身被淹沒在如此巨大、如此深沉的諸惡洪流中。因為再沒有甚麼像情慾和這類貪慾那樣,把人置於可悲的奴役之下,它們以某種沉重的罪惡之軛壓制可憐的良心,使它不能自拔,因它已喪失無辜的自由。因此,對抗這洪水最大的良藥,乃是你把那義人擺在面前,揀選他作那屬天誡命的執行者。
Whence it seems to me that, through the figure of this ark, God willed to instruct us how we may be safe from this special deluge. For corruption is the cause of the deluge. When it has crept in, the waters are opened, all the fountains of desires bubble up, so that the whole body is submerged in so great and so deep a flood of vices. For there is nothing that so subjects man to wretched servitude as lust and cravings of this sort, which press down the wretched conscience under a certain heavy yoke of crimes, so that it cannot lift itself up, inasmuch as it has lost the liberty of innocence. The greatest remedy, therefore, against this deluge is that you set the just man before you and choose him as the executor of the heavenly commandment.
11:50
quis est iustus in nobis nisi mentis uigor, qui intra istam arcam includat omne animantium genus, quod est super terram? cohibe ergo et tu omnes inrationabiles passiones tuas omnesque sensus tuos menti subice animique imperiis adsuesce. euolare foras non sinas cupiditates tuas, exire in uulgus libidinem: et per rationabilem mentem poteris etiam inrationabilia tua et inmunda peccata ab omni periculo diluuii liberare. Omnia inquit quae sunt in terra morientur. quid utique muta deliquerant animantia? qua causa subiecta sunt poenae, quae peccandi sensum non habent?
我們裏面的義人是甚麼呢?若不是心智的活力——它把地上各類活物都圍封在這方舟之內?因此你也當約束你一切不理性的情慾,使你一切感官順服心智,並使它們習慣於心靈的命令。不要容你的貪慾飛奔到外面,不要容你的情慾出去到眾人中間;藉著理性的心智,你便能使你那不理性、不潔的罪,脫離洪水的一切危險。祂說:「凡在地上的都要死。」那些不會說話的活物究竟犯了甚麼錯呢?它們既無犯罪的知覺,為何緣故被置於刑罰之下呢?
Who is the just man in us, if not the vigor of the mind, which encloses within this ark every kind of living creature that is upon the earth? Restrain, therefore, you too, all your irrational passions, and subject all your senses to the mind, and accustom them to the commands of the spirit. Do not allow your cravings to fly forth abroad, nor your lust to go out among the crowd; and through the rational mind you will be able to free even your irrational and unclean sins from all peril of the deluge. 'All things,' He says, 'that are on the earth shall die.' What, indeed, had the dumb living creatures done amiss? For what cause are they subjected to punishment, which have no sense of sinning?
11:51
sed quemadmodum in bello cum imperator ab hoste occiditur, commoritur eius exercitus atque omnis comminuitur uirtus militaris, sic non discrepare a iustitia uisum est, cum interiret homo, cui regalem quandam dominus deus in omne animantium genus potestatem dedit, ut omnibus uolatilibus feris bestiis imperiali praeesset auctoritate, quod etiam pecudes et quaecumque erant inrationabilia commorerentur animalia. denique si quando est pestilentia corrupto caeli tractu, prius ea quae sunt inrationabilia lues dira contaminat et maxime canes equos boues atque ea inficit quae cum hominibus conuersari uidentur, sic morbi uis etiam genus humanum inplicat.
但正如戰爭中,當主帥被敵人殺死,他的軍隊便與他同亡,全部軍事力量都瓦解,照樣,當人滅亡時——主神曾賜給人對各類活物某種王者的權柄,使他以帝王的權威統管一切飛禽、野獸與走獸——因此連牲畜和一切不理性的動物與他一同死去,這看來並不違背公義。簡言之,每當因天空一帶的敗壞而有瘟疫時,那可怕的疫癘首先污染那些不理性的活物,尤其感染狗、馬、牛,以及那些看似與人為伍的,如此疾病的力量也牽連到人類。
But just as in war, when the commander is slain by the enemy, his army dies with him and all its military strength is shattered, so it seemed not to depart from justice that, when man perished—to whom the Lord God had given a certain royal authority over every kind of living creature, that he might preside with imperial authority over all the birds, wild beasts, and animals—therefore even the cattle and whatever irrational animals there were should die together with him. In short, whenever there is a pestilence through the corruption of a tract of the heavens, the dread plague first contaminates those creatures that are irrational, and chiefly infects dogs, horses, oxen, and those that seem to associate with men; thus the force of disease implicates the human race as well.
11:52
haec igitur prima causa iustae, ut arbitror, adsertionis, secunda illa quia nemo accusat naturam cur reliqua corporis nostri membra moriantur solo capite sublato, cum multos uideamus amputatis manibus et pedibus superuiuere. sed non eadem ceterorum membrorum est praerogatiua quae capitis, ideoque absciso eo, unde sensus nostri in reliquum corpus prodeunt, commoriuntur etiam membra omnia, nec in eo aut operatoris prouidentia desideratur aut substantiae humanae fragilitas redarguitur. similiter ergo nemo nunc arguat quia caput et principale quoddam ceterorum animalium homo est, quo moriente non debet mirum uideri si cetera commoriantur animantia.
如我所判斷,這便是那正當主張的第一個理由。第二個是這個:沒有人會指控天性、追問為何單把頭除去,我們身體其餘的肢體便都死去,既然我們見許多人在手腳被截斷後仍存活。但其他肢體的特權與頭部的不同;因此,當頭被砍掉——我們的感官由它進入身體其餘部分——一切肢體也一同死去;在這事上既不見造物主的天意有所欠缺,也不見人類本質的脆弱被駁倒。同樣,如今也讓人不要挑剔,因為人是其他動物的頭和某種主宰,當他死時,若其餘活物與他一同死去,就不該看為奇怪。
This, then, is the first cause of the just claim, as I judge. The second is this: that no one accuses nature for asking why the remaining members of our body die when the head alone is removed, since we see many survive when their hands and feet are amputated. But the prerogative of the other members is not the same as that of the head; and therefore, when the head is cut off—whence our senses go forth into the rest of the body—all the members die together as well; nor in this is the providence of the Maker found wanting, nor the frailty of human substance refuted. Similarly, then, let no one now find fault, because man is the head and a certain principal of the other animals, at whose death it ought not to seem strange if the other living creatures die together with him.
11:53
tertium illud est quia rationis expertia non propter se, sed propter hominem generata sunt animalia; hominis enim causa esse praecepta sunt, ut eorum subiectione humana praestaret condicio. denique gratiae hominis adtribuit propheta dicens: omnia subiecisti sub pedibus eius, oues et boues uniuersas, insuper et pecora campi, uolucres caeli et pisces maris, quia propter ipsum illa omnia, alia propter utilitatem, alia delectationis gratia, alia uoluptatis. consequens ergo erat, ut cum deleretur homo a facie terrae, propter quem facta sunt, etiam illa pari delerentur occasu. haec secundum simplicem lectionis expositionem.
第三個是這個:那些沒有理性的活物受造,不是為自己的緣故,乃是為人的緣故;因為牠們奉命為人而存在,好叫人的境況藉著牠們的順服而得尊貴。簡言之,先知把這歸於人的尊榮,說:「你叫萬物都服在他腳下,就是一切牛羊、田野的走獸、空中的飛鳥、海裏的魚」——因為那一切都是為他的緣故:有些為實用,有些為悅樂的緣故,有些為享受。因此理所當然:當人——這一切受造之物為他而造——從地面被抹除時,那些活物也該在同樣的毀滅中被抹除。這些是按字面誦讀的解釋。
The third is this: that the creatures lacking reason were generated not for their own sake, but for man's sake; for they were commanded to be for man's cause, that the human condition might excel by their subjection. In short, the prophet attributed this to the grace of man, saying: 'You have subjected all things under his feet, all sheep and oxen, and moreover the beasts of the field, the birds of the air and the fishes of the sea'—since all those things are for his sake: some for utility, some for the sake of delight, some for pleasure. It was consequent, therefore, that when man was blotted out from the face of the earth, for whose sake they were made, those things too should be blotted out in a like destruction. These things according to the simple exposition of the reading.
11:54
t Altior autem et profundior interpretatio illud adtexit, quod ubi anima mole passionum curuatur graui et quasi diuersarum cupiditatum aestu mergitur, terrenae omnes cogitationes et concupiscentiae in praeceps ruunt, quia peccator unusquisque quo grauiora flagitia commiserit eo fit insolentior. namque usu atque exercitatione inprobitas augetur et inpunitate nutritur audacia. recedit itaque ab omni respectu honestatis et in eo terrena moriuntur omnia letalis peccati acerbitate, quae uera et perpetua morte peccatorem deleat; nemo enim grauius moritur quam qui peccato uiuit.
但更崇高、更深邃的解釋補充這點:當心靈被情慾沉重的重擔壓彎,彷彿被各種貪慾的浪潮所淹沒時,一切屬地的思念和私慾都急速墜落,因為每個罪人所犯的罪愈重,便愈發放肆。因為惡藉著習慣與操練而增長,膽大妄為又因不受刑罰而被滋養。因此他棄絕對尊榮的一切顧念,在他裏面一切屬地之物便藉致死之罪的苦毒而死去,這罪以真實而永恆的死毀滅罪人;因為再沒有人比那活在罪中的人死得更慘。
But a loftier and deeper interpretation adds this: that when the soul is bent down by the heavy mass of passions and is, as it were, submerged by the surge of diverse cravings, all earthly thoughts and concupiscences rush headlong, because every sinner becomes the more insolent the graver the crimes he has committed. For by habit and practice wickedness is increased, and audacity is nourished by impunity. He therefore withdraws from all regard for honor, and in him all earthly things die through the bitterness of deadly sin, which destroys the sinner with a true and perpetual death; for no one dies more grievously than he who lives in sin.
11:55
moriuntur in eo passiones singulae, moritur uisus, qui peccatum adnuntiat, qui intendit mulieri fallaci, qui capitur alieni uultus decore, quem oculi meretricis ligauerint, quem aspectus inlaqueauerit fornicariae. an non uidetur mori qui sibi libidinis telum inpresserit, qui spontaneus in foueam mortis inrueiit? moritur et auditus, cum refert crimina, cum sollicitantis adulteri sermonem adnuntiat, cum inserit animis uerba meretricis, quae seducit iuuenem multo blandimento sermonis, laqueis autem labiorum suorum inligat eum. moritur uox silentio, si non confiteatur deo: moritur multiloquio, quia scriptum est tibi: ex multiloquio non effugies peccatum:
在他裏面,諸般情慾各自死去;視覺死去——它宣告罪,注視欺詐的婦人,被別人面容之美所擄,被妓女的眼目所綁,被淫婦的眼神所羅。那把情慾的箭矢按在自己身上、自願衝入死亡之坑的人,豈不顯為死了嗎?聽覺也死去,當它傳述罪行,當它宣告勾引人的姦夫的話語,當它把妓女的話注入人心——她以許多諂媚的言語誘惑少年人,又用她嘴唇的網羅纏住他。聲音若不向神認罪,便在緘默中死去;它在多言中死去,因為經上為你寫著:「多言多語難免有罪。」
In him each of the passions dies; sight dies, which announces sin, which gazes at a deceitful woman, which is captivated by another's beauty of countenance, which the eyes of a harlot have bound, which the look of a fornicating woman has ensnared. Does he not seem to die who has pressed upon himself the dart of lust, who has rushed of his own accord into the pit of death? Hearing too dies, when it reports crimes, when it announces the speech of a soliciting adulterer, when it instills into souls the words of a harlot, who seduces the young man with much flattery of speech and binds him with the snares of her lips. The voice dies in silence, if it does not confess to God; it dies in much speaking, because it is written for you: 'In much speaking you shall not escape sin.'
11:56
moritur per iracundiam, cum praetergreditur mensuram ultionis: omnis postremo sensus moritur, si minister sit iniquitatis. et ideo quia terrena omnia moriuntur diluuio, solus autem iustus in aeternum manet, ad ipsum dicitur: statuam testamentum meum ad te, quia ipse diuinae est heres gratiae, ipse caelestis possessor hereditatis, beatissimorum consors honorum. et homines quidem cum moriuntur, patrimonium suum testamento transcribere solent, nec cedit hereditas, donec uiuit testator: deus autem cum sit sempiternus, transfundit iustis diuinae hereditatem substantiae et ipse non indigens donat sua sine ullo donationis dispendio, quem non grauant suorum consortes honorum.
它藉忿怒而死去,當它越過報復的度量時;最後,每一個感官若作不義的差役,便都死去。因此,正因一切屬地之物都在洪水中死去,唯獨義人永遠長存,便有話對他說:「我要與你立我的約」,因為他是神恩典的後嗣,是屬天基業的承受者,是至福之善的有分者。人在死時誠然慣於以遺囑轉移自己的家業,而當立遺囑者活著時,基業並不轉移;但神既是永恆的,便把神聖本質的基業傾注給義人,且自己一無所缺,賜下己有而毫無饋贈的損耗,因為與祂自己之善有分的人對祂並非負擔。
It dies through wrath, when it transgresses the measure of vengeance; finally, every sense dies, if it be a minister of iniquity. And therefore, because all earthly things die in the deluge, but the just man alone abides forever, it is said to him: 'I will establish my covenant with you,' because he is the heir of divine grace, he the possessor of the heavenly inheritance, the partaker of the most blessed goods. And men indeed, when they die, are wont to transcribe their patrimony by testament, nor does the inheritance pass while the testator lives; but God, since He is everlasting, transfuses to the just the inheritance of the divine substance, and, Himself lacking nothing, bestows His own without any loss of the gift, since the partners of His own goods are no burden to Him.
11:57
magisque fruitur eo quo nos utimur. denique dominus Iesus pauper factus est, cum diues esset, ut illius inopia nos ditaremur, qui testamentum utrumque suo consummauit sanguine, ut nos uitae suae coheredes et mortis faceret heredes, quo et uitae haberemus consortium et mortis beneficium. multum autem tribuit iusto dicendo: statuam testamentum meum ad te, eo quod rationabilis et fidelis uir ipse sit testamentum dei. ipse est enim hereditas dei, ipse possessio, in quo uirtus diuini testamenti est, in quo fructus iudicii, in quo hereditas promissionis, de quo dixit Dauid: ecce hereditas domini filii, merces fructus uentris.
我們所享用的,祂更得享受。簡言之,主耶穌本來富足,卻成了貧窮,叫我們因祂的貧窮可以成為富足——祂用自己的血成全了兩約,好叫我們作祂生命的同承受者、祂死的承受者,藉此我們既得與祂生命的交契,又得祂死的益處。再者,祂藉著說「我要與你立我的約」而大大賜恩給義人,因為那有理性、有信德的人,自己就是神的約。因為他是神的基業,是神的產業,在他裏面有神聖之約的德能,在他裏面有審判的果子,在他裏面有應許的基業,論到他大衛說:「看哪,眾子是耶和華的產業,腹中的果子是祂的賞賜。」
And He enjoys the more that which we use. In short, the Lord Jesus, though He was rich, became poor, that by His poverty we might be enriched—He who consummated both testaments by His own blood, that He might make us coheirs of His life and heirs of His death, whereby we might have both the fellowship of His life and the benefit of His death. Moreover, He bestowed much on the just man by saying, 'I will establish my covenant with you,' inasmuch as the rational and faithful man is himself the testament of God. For he is the inheritance of God, he the possession, in whom is the virtue of the divine testament, in whom the fruit of judgment, in whom the inheritance of the promise, of whom David said: 'Behold, the inheritance of the Lord are sons, the reward, the fruit of the womb.'
11:58
sed iam salua expositione profundioris mysterii ad reliqua pergamus., Intra inquit tu et omnis domus tua in arcam, quia241 te uidi iustum in generatione ista. manifeste fides propheticae sententiae etiam hoc adstruitur loco, quia stultus sibi soli stultus est, rapiens autem sibi et plurimis sapit. itaque Noe iusti merito etiam domus eius in diluuio seruatur. sic in mari nauigantes et in bello exercitus, si illis non desit gubernatoris peritia, istis imperatoris prudentia, a periculo tuti sunt aliena ope.
但如今,既保留了那更深奧祕的解釋,讓我們進到其餘部分。祂說:「你和你全家都要進入方舟,因為在這世代中我見你是義人。」顯然先知這話的信實在這裏也得到確立,因為愚人只是對自己愚拙,而那奪取的,卻為自己也為許多人得益。如此,因義人挪亞的功勞,他的家也在洪水中得保全。照樣,那些航海的人和戰爭中的軍隊,若前者不缺舵手的技藝,後者不缺主帥的智慧,便藉著他人的幫助脫離危險。
But now, the exposition of the deeper mystery being preserved, let us proceed to the rest. 'Enter,' He says, 'you and all your house into the ark, for I have seen you just in this generation.' Manifestly the faith of the prophetic sentence is established also in this place, because the fool is foolish to himself alone, but he who plunders gains for himself and for very many. And so by the merit of just Noah his house too is preserved in the deluge. Thus those who sail on the sea, and the army in war, if to the former the skill of the helmsman be not lacking, and to the latter the prudence of the commander, are safe from peril by another's help.
11:59
sed quia boni imperatoris bonus exercitus est, ideo etiam in eo laudem iusti intellegimus non praeteriri, qui talem instituit domum suam, ut uirtutis fulgeret consortio, meritoque inuenit salutem cognatio. nec repugnat quia postea aut filius aut uxor offendit. dormiebat iustus, cum erraret filius. femina quoque utpote sexus fragilioris mole periculi turbata, quae totum orbem diuino incendio perire crederet, quid miraris si uirum non potuit sequi, cum ipse iustus ab angelis monitus uix euaserit? quid autem mirum si homini obrepat error aut se relaxet intentio? argue ergo quia et iustus inebriatus est. sed haec loco suo reseruanda arbitror. nunc quod superest consideremus. pulchre enim dixit:
但因好軍隊屬於好主帥,所以在這事上我們也明白,義人的稱讚並未被略過——他如此建立自己的家,使它以德行的交契發光,他的親屬便理當得著救恩。後來無論是兒子或妻子有所冒犯,這也並不矛盾。當兒子犯錯時,義人正在睡覺。那婦人也屬較脆弱的性別,被巨大的危險所擾——她以為全世界正被神的烈火毀滅——若她不能跟隨丈夫,又有何奇,既然連義人本身蒙天使警告也僅僅得脫?人若被錯誤悄然侵襲,或他的專注鬆懈,又有何奇?那麼就指控他吧,因為連義人也醉了。但這些事我認為當留到適當之處再說。如今讓我們思想其餘的。因為祂優美地說:
But because a good army belongs to a good commander, therefore in this too we understand that the praise of the just man is not passed over, who so established his house that it shone with the fellowship of virtue, and his kindred deservedly found salvation. Nor is it a contradiction that afterward either the son or the wife gave offense. The just man was sleeping when the son erred. The woman too, as being of the more fragile sex, troubled by the mass of peril, who would believe that the whole world was perishing by the divine conflagration—what wonder if she could not follow her husband, when the just man himself, warned by the angels, barely escaped? And what wonder if error creeps upon a man, or his attention relaxes? Accuse him, then, because even the just man was made drunk. But these things I judge are to be reserved for their own place. Now let us consider what remains. For He beautifully said:
11:60
quia te uidi iustum in generatione ista. multi hominibus iusti uidentur, pauci deo: aliter hominibus, aliter deo: hominibus secundum uitae speciem, deo secundum puritatem animi, uirtutis ueritatem; homines quae foris sunt probant, deus quae intus examinat. perpense autem addidit: in generatione ista, ut neque superiores condemnaret neque posteriores excluderet recteque diluuium factum adstrueret interitu generationis eius. quae non haberet aequitatis consortium. haec secundum litteram. altior autem sensus prouocat nos, ut hoc putemus uigorem mentis in anima esse et animam in corpore quod est pater familias in domo sua. quod enim in anima mens, hoc anima in corpore. si mens tuta est.
「因為在這世代中我見你是義人。」許多人在人面前顯為義,在神面前卻少有:在人面前是一回事,在神面前是另一回事——在人面前是按生活的外表,在神面前是按心靈的純潔與德行的真實;人贊許外面的,神察驗裏面的。但祂深思地補充說「在這世代中」,好叫祂既不定先前之人的罪,也不排斥後來之人,並正當地確立洪水乃是藉著那毫無公平交契的世代的毀滅而成就的。這些是按字面而言。但更崇高的意義召喚我們去設想:心智的這活力在心靈裏,心靈在身體裏,正如一家之主在他的家裏。因為心智在心靈裏是甚麼,心靈在身體裏便是甚麼。心智若得安全,
'Because I have seen you just in this generation.' Many seem just to men, few to God: it is one thing to men, another to God—to men according to the outward appearance of life, to God according to the purity of soul and the truth of virtue; men approve what is outside, God examines what is within. But thoughtfully He added, 'in this generation,' so that He might neither condemn the earlier nor exclude the later, and might rightly establish that the deluge was made by the destruction of that generation which had no fellowship of equity. These things according to the letter. But the loftier sense calls us to suppose that this vigor of the mind is in the soul, and the soul in the body, as the father of the family is in his house. For what the mind is in the soul, this the soul is in the body. If the mind is safe,
11:61
tuta est domus, tuta est anima: si anima incolumis. incolumis caro. mens enim sobria passiones omnes cohibet, sensus gubernat. sermonem regit. ideoque bene dicit dominus iusto: intra tu, hoc est: in te ipsum intra, in tuam mentem, in tuae animae principale. ibi salus est, ibi gubernaculum, foris diluuium, foris periculum. si autem intus fueris, et foris tutus es, quia ubi mens sui arbitra est, bonae sunt cogitationes, bonae exsecutiones. si enim nihil uitii mentem obumbret, sincerae cogitationes sunt. si studio sit castitas, cordi sit temperantia, nulla flamma inardescit libidinis, nulla ulcera proserpunt aegritudinis; sobrietas enim mentis medicina est corporis.
家便得安全,心靈便得安全;心靈若無損,肉體便無損。因為清醒的心智約束一切情慾,管理感官,治理言語。因此主對義人說得好:「你要進入」,就是:進入你自己裏面,進入你的心智,進入你心靈的主宰部分。救恩在那裏,舵在那裏;外面是洪水,外面是危險。但你若在裏面,在外面也安全,因為當心智是自己的主宰,思念便是善的,行為便是善的。因為若無罪惡遮蔽心智,思念便是純正的。你若以貞潔為熱心,以節制為心所繫,便無情慾的火焰熾烈,無病痛的潰瘍蔓延;因為心智的清醒乃是身體的良藥。
the house is safe, the soul is safe; if the soul is unharmed, the flesh is unharmed. For the sober mind restrains all the passions, governs the senses, rules the speech. And therefore the Lord well says to the just man: 'Enter you,' that is: enter into your very self, into your mind, into the principal part of your soul. There is salvation, there is the helm; outside is the deluge, outside is the peril. But if you are within, you are also safe outside, because where the mind is mistress of itself, the thoughts are good, the actions are good. For if no vice overshadows the mind, the thoughts are sincere. If chastity be your zeal, if temperance be in your heart, no flame of lust burns hot, no ulcers of sickness creep forth; for the sobriety of the mind is the medicine of the body.
11:62
1Nunc consideremus qua ratione induci in arcam iubet a iumentis mundis septem et septem, masculum et feminam, ab inmundis autem duo et duo. ut nutriatur semen in omnem terram. et, ut ego arbitror, inire mundam adserit ebdomadam, quia mundus et sacer septimus numerus; nulli enim miscetur nec ab alio generatur. ideoque uirgo dicitur, quia nihil ex se generat, meritoque tamquam materni exsors inmunisque partus et muliebris copulae, etsi ebdomas femineo nuncupetur uocabulo, uirilis habet sanctificationis gratiam; omnis enim masculus adaperiens uuluam [sanctus] domino uocabitur, hoc est sanctus. et in propheta habes: effugit peperitque masculum, id est sanctum.
如今讓我們思想,祂憑甚麼原則吩咐把潔淨的走獸一公一母帶七對進入方舟,而不潔淨的只帶兩隻,好叫種子在全地上得以養育。如我所判斷,祂主張潔淨之數乃是七數,因為第七之數是潔淨而神聖的;因它不與任何數相混,也不由別的數所生。因此它被稱為童貞女,因它不從自己生出甚麼,這也理所當然,因它脫離並免於母性與女性的交合及生產;雖然七數以陰性的詞命名,它卻有陽剛聖化的恩典;因為「凡頭生的男子要稱為歸主為聖」,就是聖潔。在先知書中你也讀到:「她逃跑生了一個男孩」,就是一個聖者。
Now let us consider on what principle He commands to be brought into the ark, of the clean beasts seven and seven, male and female, but of the unclean two and two, that seed may be nourished upon all the earth. And, as I judge, He asserts that the clean number is the hebdomad (seven), because the seventh number is clean and sacred; for it is mingled with none nor generated by another. And therefore it is called a virgin, because it generates nothing of itself, and deservedly, as being free and exempt from maternal and womanish coupling and birth; and although the hebdomad be named by a feminine word, it has the grace of a virile sanctification; for 'every male that opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord,' that is, holy. And in the prophet you have: 'She fled and bore a male,' that is, a holy one.
11:63
secundus autem numerus non est plenus, quia diuisus. quod autem non est plenum uacuum habetur. septimus autem numerus plenus, quia ebdomas ut decas, et similis illius primi, quia alpha ad similitudinem est illius qui est semper, a quo profluunt et mouentur quae sunt in omni genere uirtutes. haec naturalia. de moralibus autem ut dicamus, non est dubium quod inrationabile animae nostrae in quinque sensus diuidatur et uocem et generatorium, quae natura uidentur esse feminea, quia sensus nostri in materialia et saecularia cito repunt. unde claret eos mollioris naturae habere substantiam.
但第二之數不完全,因它是分裂的;而不完全的便被視為空虛。然而第七之數是完全的,因為七數如十數,又與那第一者相似,因為「阿拉法」乃是按那永遠存在者的樣式,眾德能由祂流出並運行,存於各類之中。這些是按本性的意義。但要論及道德的意義:毫無疑問,我們心靈中不理性的部分分為五官、言語和生殖機能,這些按本性看似屬陰性,因為我們的感官快速地爬向物質和屬世之事。由此可見它們的本質屬較柔軟的性質。
But the second number is not full, because it is divided; and what is not full is held to be empty. The seventh number, however, is full, because the hebdomad is like the decad, and similar to that first one, because the alpha is in the likeness of Him who is forever, from whom flow forth and are moved the virtues that are in every kind. These are the natural meanings. But to speak of the moral ones: there is no doubt that the irrational part of our soul is divided into the five senses and speech and the generative faculty, which by nature seem to be feminine, because our senses creep quickly into material and worldly things. Whence it is clear that they have a substance of a softer nature.
11:64
sed erudito et industrio uiro munda omnia, quia sapientia exercitati uiri et uirtus firmamentum his uirile transfundit. iudicio ergo prudentis et proposito gubernantis ex inferioris sexus qualitate in fortiorem substantiam transferuntur. uslida enim sapientis et fixa sententia est, non mutabilis, ut insipientis et stulti, qui consilio nutat incerto, ut inprobi, qui non quod uerum et iustum sit eligit, sed quod sibi commodum uel ut< <ile> > scindit a uero, secernit a iusto. iustitia enim singulare est bonum, per se ipsa suo tantum spectatur pretio, iniquitas uero uelut diuidua parit nunc odio inflexa, nunc quaestu et ea quae sunt diuidenda confundit.
但對受過教育、勤勉的人,凡物都是潔淨的,因為受過操練之人的智慧與德行,把陽剛的堅定傾注於這些。因此,藉著精明者的判斷與治理者的旨意,它們便從較低性別的性質被轉化為較強的本質。因為智慧人的決意是堅固而確定的,不像愚昧無知者的決意那樣善變——他以不定的籌算搖擺,如同惡人,他所揀選的不是真實公義的,乃是於己便利或有用的,把它從真實中切割、從公義中分離。因為公義是獨一之善,憑自身、單憑其本身的價值而被觀照;但不義彷彿是分裂的,時而被仇恨、時而被利益所扭曲而生出惡果,並把當分別的事混淆。
But to the educated and diligent man all things are clean, because the wisdom and virtue of the disciplined man transfuses a virile firmness into these. Therefore, by the judgment of the prudent and the purpose of him who governs, they are transferred from the quality of the inferior sex into a stronger substance. For valid and fixed is the resolve of the wise man, not changeable like that of the senseless and the fool, who wavers with uncertain counsel, like the wicked man, who chooses not what is true and just, but what is convenient or useful to himself, cutting it off from the true, separating it from the just. For justice is a singular good, contemplated by itself, by its own worth alone; but iniquity, being as it were divided, brings forth now bent by hatred, now by gain, and confounds the things that ought to be kept distinct.
11:65
stultus enim ut luna mutatur et uersicolora umorum uarietate deformis animam suam in leprosi corporis speciem turpi contagione commaculat salubres cogitationes noxiis saepe permiscens. Sed fortasse quia munda et inmunda induci in arcam praecipi cernis animantia iure mouere te possit, quia dixi honestis disceptationibus indecoras non esse miscendas. nec ego abnuo inrationabilium quidem, mundorum tamen motuum esse aliqua semina et quasi principia in anima nostra et eorum qui mundi non sint.
因為愚人如月亮般變化,且因其情緒斑駁不定的變幻而面目全非,藉污穢的傳染把自己的心靈玷污成麻瘋病軀的模樣,常把有益的思念與有害的思念相混。但或許,因你看見潔淨與不潔淨的活物都奉命被帶進方舟,這可能正當地使你動念,既然我曾說過:不體面的爭辯不該與體面的相混。我也不否認,在我們心靈中確有不理性卻潔淨之動的某些種子和彷彿的起頭,也有那不潔淨之動的種子和起頭。
For the fool, like the moon, is changed, and, disfigured by the variegated and shifting variety of his humors, stains his own soul into the appearance of a leprous body by a foul contagion, often mingling wholesome thoughts with harmful ones. But perhaps, because you perceive that both clean and unclean living creatures are commanded to be brought into the ark, it may rightly move you, since I said that unseemly disputes ought not to be mingled with honorable ones. Nor do I deny that there are indeed certain seeds and, as it were, beginnings of irrational—yet clean—motions in our soul, and of those that are not clean.
11:66
natura enim hominis contrariorum est capax, ut et malitiae in eam sit et uirtuti ingressus, meritoque in principio libri huius, qui est Genesis, per arboris speciem in paradisi medio legisti boni et mali scientiam. de quo ligno scientiae boni et mali praeceptum est non esse gustandum, eo quod mens nostra, in qua est cognitio et disciplina, boni et mali recipit notionem.
因為人的本性能容納相反之物,使惡與德都有進入它的入口;這也理所當然,在這卷書——就是創世記——的開頭,你已讀到藉著樂園中央那棵樹的形象而有的善惡知識。論到這棵分別善惡的知識之樹,曾有命令說不可吃它,因為我們的心智——其中有認知與規範——領受善與惡的概念。
For the nature of man is capable of contraries, so that into it there is an entrance both for malice and for virtue; and deservedly, at the beginning of this book, which is Genesis, you have read of the knowledge of good and evil through the appearance of the tree in the midst of paradise. Of this tree of the knowledge of good and evil it was commanded that it was not to be tasted, because our mind, in which is cognition and discipline, receives the notion of good and evil.
11:67
itaque naturae opifex sicut ad propagandum uel etiam reparandum genus animantia reseruauit, ut uniuersae terrae animantium semine replerentur, ita etiam corporis nostri terrenam substantiam uacuam non putauit passionum huiusmodi tamquam inmundorum animalium relinquendam, quae cum deliciis et luxurie tamquam uice diluuii ingurgitatur, memoratis fluctuat passionibus. ubi autem sobrietate et continentia unusquisque inundantium euacuauerit diluuium passionum et quandam animae retexerit siccitatem, uiuificare incipit suum corpus et animae puritatem, cui regimen sapientia est.
如此,自然的造物主,正如祂為繁衍乃至修復物種而保留了活物,好叫全地充滿活物的種子,照樣,祂也不認為我們身體屬地的本質該被留為空虛、毫無這類情慾——如同不潔的動物——當這本質如同被一場洪水般以享樂與奢侈所灌飽時,便因前述的情慾而波動。但當各人藉著清醒與自制掏空了那泛濫情慾的洪水,並使心靈顯出某種乾燥時,他便開始使自己的身體與心靈的純潔得生命,這純潔的治理者乃是智慧。
And so the Maker of nature, just as He reserved living creatures for the propagating or even repairing of the species, that the whole earth might be filled with the seed of living creatures, so also He did not think that the earthly substance of our body should be left empty of passions of this sort, as of unclean animals, which, when it is glutted with delights and luxury as with a kind of deluge, fluctuates with the aforesaid passions. But when each one, by sobriety and continence, has emptied out the deluge of overflowing passions and has laid bare a certain dryness of the soul, he begins to give life to his own body and to the purity of the soul, whose governance is wisdom.
11:68
Illud quoque studio est quaerere, quae causa est cur, posteaquam ingressus est Noe arcam et induxit animantia, post septem dies diluuium factum sit. non enim otiosum uidetur quod non aut plures aut pauciores interpositi sint dies, sed tot quot in constitutione mundi fuerunt. sex enim diebus factus est mundus, septimo die requieuit deus ab operibus suis. quo declarauit indicio ipsum se esse auctorem mundi atque diluuii. mundum propter bonitatem suam condidit, diluuium fecit nostrorum merito delictorum. admoniti sunt igitur homines uel ex numero dierum, quibus mundus est conditus, quod conditorem suum non lacrimis solum et precatione, sed correctione morum reconciliare debuerant.
還值得殷勤探究:為何在挪亞進入方舟、帶進活物之後,洪水是過了七天才發生,其緣由為何。因為所間隔的日子既不多也不少,恰好與創世時的日數相同,這看來並非無意義。因為世界是在六日內被造成,第七日神就歇了祂一切的工。藉此記號祂宣告:祂自己既是世界的創始者,也是洪水的創始者。世界祂因自己的良善而創立;洪水祂因我們罪過的緣故而造成。因此,人即使藉著創立世界的日數也受了警戒:他們本當不僅以眼淚和祈求,更要以品行的改正來與他們的創始者復和。
It is also worth inquiring with diligence what the cause is why, after Noah entered the ark and brought in the living creatures, the deluge came to pass after seven days. For it does not seem idle that neither more nor fewer days were interposed, but just as many as there were in the constitution of the world. For in six days the world was made, and on the seventh day God rested from His works. By which sign He declared that He Himself was the author both of the world and of the deluge. The world He founded because of His goodness; the deluge He made by the merit of our sins. Men, then, were admonished even by the number of days in which the world was founded, that they ought to have reconciled their Founder not by tears and prayer alone, but by the correction of their morals.
11:69
ergo spatium dedit ad paenitentiam dominus magis uolens ignoscere quam punire, ut imminentis diluuii terrore suspensos ad ueniam cogeret postulandam, quo dum periculum futurae mortis horrescunt, inpietati atque iniustitiae renuntiarent. secundum est, ut hinc quoque domini supra modum misericordis clementiam colligamus, quia multorum annorum offensionem a constitutione mundi in finem usque contractam paucis diebus, si paenituisset eos, uoluit relaxare. est enim deus peccati inmemor, uirtutis remunerator, sicut ait ipse in propheta: ego sum, ego sum qui deleo iniquitates et memor non ero. tu autem memor esto et iudicemur; dic iniquitates tuas, ut iustificeris.
因此主賜下悔改的時間,祂寧願赦免而不願懲罰,好叫那些因迫近洪水的恐懼而懸在不安中的人,被催逼去求赦免,藉此,當他們懼怕將來死亡的危險時,便棄絕不敬虔和不義。第二點是:由此我們也可以推知主——祂憐憫無量——的寬容,因為那從創世直到末了所積累的多年罪過,祂願意在短短幾天內赦免,只要他們悔改。因為神不記念罪,乃是賞賜德行者,正如祂自己在先知書中所說:「是我,是我塗抹你的過犯,並且不再記念。你卻當記念,你我可以一同辯論;你要陳明你的不義,好得稱義。」
Therefore the Lord gave space for repentance, willing rather to pardon than to punish, that He might compel those held in suspense by the terror of the impending deluge to ask for pardon, whereby, while they dread the peril of future death, they might renounce impiety and injustice. The second point is that from this too we may gather the clemency of the Lord, who is merciful beyond measure, because the offense of many years, contracted from the constitution of the world even to the end, He willed to remit in a few days, if they had repented. For God is forgetful of sin, a rewarder of virtue, as He Himself says in the prophet: 'I am, I am He who blots out iniquities and will not remember them. But you, be mindful, and let us be judged; declare your iniquities, that you may be justified.'
11:70
cum enim aduerterit ueram animae refusam esse uirtutem, tantum ei honoris adtribuit, ut non solum ueniam superiorum indulgeat peccatorum, uerum etiam gratiam et iustificationes inpertiat. expectauit ergo et septimo die, ipso quo ab operatione requieuit, ut si lll\'nia posceretur, sequeretur correctio, et ab indignatione requiesceret. Illud quoque curae fuit non praetermittere eo quod diluuium factum dixerit quadraginta diebus et addiderit quadraginta noctibus. scimus enim diem dici quem sol terram illuminans signat, noctem quam circumfusae tenebrae a diei claritate disterminant et plerumque ita a nobis diem significari ut noctem non conprehendamus, plerumque ut conplectamur.
因為當祂察覺心靈真正的德行已被傾注回來,便賜給它如此的尊榮,以致祂不僅赦免從前的罪,更賜下恩典與稱義。因此祂等候,直到第七日——就是祂歇了工作的那日——好叫倘若要求更多,改正便隨之而來,祂也好歇了祂的義怒。這點也值得留心不可略過:祂說洪水是在四十晝發生,又加上四十夜。因為我們知道,太陽照亮大地所標示的稱為「晝」;圍繞的黑暗從白日的光明中分隔出來的稱為「夜」;我們多半如此指稱「晝」,以致不把夜包含在內,但多半也如此指稱,以致把夜涵蓋在內。
For when He has perceived that the true virtue of the soul has been poured back, He attributes such honor to it that He not only grants pardon of former sins, but also imparts grace and justifications. He waited, therefore, even until the seventh day—the very day on which He rested from His operation—so that, if anything more were demanded, correction might follow, and He might rest from His indignation. This too was a matter of care not to pass over: that He said the deluge was made in forty days, and added forty nights. For we know that day is called that which the sun, illuminating the earth, marks out; night, that which the surrounding darkness divides off from the brightness of day; and for the most part day is so signified by us that we do not comprehend the night, but for the most part so that we include it.
11:71
significantes enim mensem triginta dierum significamus et noctes. unde cum satis fuisset Moysi dixisse diluuium fuisse quadraginta diebus, cur addiderit et quadraginta noctibus quaeritur. et aliqui ita acceperunt.
因為當我們指明一個三十天的月份時,我們同時也指明了夜晚。因此,既然摩西只說洪水持續了四十天本應已經足夠,便有人問他為何還要加上「又四十夜」。有些人是這樣理解的。
For in signifying a month of thirty days we signify also the nights. Hence, since it would have been enough for Moses to have said that the flood lasted forty days, the question is asked why he added 'and forty nights' as well. And some have understood it thus.
11:72
qui ante nos fuerunt, ut et uirorum et mulierum factus diluuio interitus demonstraretur, diem ad uirum referentes, qui sit purior, similis lucis, noctem ad mulierem, quae uiro dormiente creata describitur, simul quia uir prior quasi auctor, qui uirtutem moueat mulieris atque in partus excitet, actu ille clarior publico, ista obscurior tamquam domesticis clausa parietibus et nocti proxima, secundo orta loco et creationis suae formata in costa uiri debens gratiam superiori, numeri quoque potioris obnoxia priuilegio et pariendi usu materialibus comparanda.
在我們之前的那些人之所以如此理解,是為了表明洪水帶來了男人和女人雙方的毀滅:他們把白晝歸於男人——男人較為純潔,如同光明;把黑夜歸於女人——按記載,女人是在男人沉睡時被造的。同樣地,因為男人先被造,彷彿是創始者,激發女人的力量並催促她生育;男人在公開的活動中較為顯赫,女人則較為隱晦,彷彿被關在家庭的牆內、貼近黑夜,是次序中第二位被生出的,在她的受造中是從男人的肋骨形成的,因而虧欠那位在她之上者的恩惠,也受制於那較大數目的特權,並因生育的功用而可與物質之物相比。
Those who lived before us did so in order to show that by the flood there came the destruction of both men and women: they referred the day to the man, who is purer and like the light, and the night to the woman, who is described as created while the man slept; likewise because the man came first, as if the author, who stirs up the strength of the woman and rouses her to childbearing, more conspicuous in his public activity, while she is more obscure, as though shut within domestic walls and close to the night, brought forth in the second place, and formed in her creation from the rib of the man, owing her favour to the one above her, subject also to the privilege of the greater number, and to be likened to material things by her function of bearing children.
11:73
consonans autem in utroque numerus periculi, quia peccata etiam consonantia, meritoque non distant spatia temporum, quia non distant merita delictorum. Non mediocriter etiam scrutantur plerique qua ratione quadraginta dies diluuium fuerit. et possumus dicere materialem numerum tristioribus, hoc est delendae creaturae deputatum, ebdomada autem constitutioni totius mundi, hoc est laetioribus. sed fortasse referat quid quod etiam lex quadraginta diebus lata est. tot dies obseruauit Moyses in monte Sina ac demoratus est, cum praescripta legis acciperet.
在兩者之中,就危險而言這數目是相符的,因為罪也是相符的;而時間的長度理所當然並無差別,因為過犯的應得之罰並無差別。許多人也不無深意地探究,洪水為何持續四十天。我們可以說,這物質之數被指定給較悲傷之事,即指定給將被毀滅的受造物;而那「七」之數則歸於整個世界的建構,即歸於較喜樂之事。但或許值得一提的是,律法也是在四十天內頒下的。摩西在西奈山上守候並停留了這許多天,那時他領受了律法的誡命。
Now the number is consonant in both as regards the peril, because the sins too are consonant, and rightly the spans of time do not differ, because the deserts of the transgressions do not differ. Many also inquire not slightly by what reason the flood lasted forty days. And we can say that the material number was assigned to the more sorrowful things, that is, to the creation that was to be destroyed, but the week to the constitution of the whole world, that is, to the more joyful things. But perhaps it is relevant that the Law too was given in forty days. So many days Moses observed on Mount Sinai and tarried there, when he received the precepts of the Law.
11:74
recte igitur eodem numero declinandorum peccatorum praecepta tribuuntur, quo poenae culpa est persoluta, ut cognoscamus quod eodem uitae tempore debeat ex correctione laus comparari, quo potest punienda culpa committi. unde nunc iam non poenae praescripti sunt dies quadraginta, sed uitae, ut hoc numero ieiuniis et orationibus crebrioribus nostrorum leuemus subplicia peccatorum atque ad praescripta legis intenti deuotione ac fide nostrum corrigamus errorem. itaque per domini resurrectionem quadragesimus dies iam non habetur nouissimus, sed primus atque inde uita numeratur, ubi ante mortis numerus ad consummationem mundi et humani generis excidium conputabatur.
因此理所當然地,避免罪惡的誡命是以同樣的數目賜下的——就是以罪過藉刑罰得償還的那同樣數目,好叫我們認識到:在能犯下當受懲罰之過的同一段人生中,也當藉著改正贏得稱讚。因此如今這四十天不再是為刑罰所定,而是為生命所定,好叫我們藉這數目、藉禁食和更頻繁的禱告,減輕我們罪的刑罰,並以虔誠和信德專注於律法的誡命,改正我們的過錯。於是藉著主的復活,第四十日如今不再被視為末日,而是首日,從那裡開始計算生命;而從前這數目卻是計算至死亡、至世界的終結與人類的滅亡。
Rightly, therefore, the precepts for the avoidance of sins are given in the same number by which the guilt was paid off in punishment, that we may recognize that in the same span of life in which a punishable fault can be committed, praise ought to be won by correction. Whence now no longer are forty days prescribed for punishment, but for life, that by this number, through fastings and more frequent prayers, we may lighten the penalties of our sins, and, intent upon the precepts of the Law with devotion and faith, may correct our error. And so through the Lord's resurrection the fortieth day is now held to be no longer the last, but the first, and from there life is reckoned, where before the count was reckoned unto death, unto the consummation of the world and the destruction of the human race.
11:75
I Et delebo inquit omnem resurrectionem carnis a facie terrae. o caelestium pulchritudo uerborum, si quis ea decoro intellectu piae mentis examinet! indignatur deus peccatis nostris, sed non obliuiscitur pietatis: minatur supplicium, sed non permisit excidium: moderatur uindictam, reuocat seueritatem. deleturum se dicit carnem non a terra, sed a facie terrae. florem decutit, radices reseruat: sinit ut in profundo substantiae uirtus maneat humanae, quae in superficie laboret, intus inpassibilis perseueret inmunisque noxae ad eorum substitutionem qui non sint reatu obnoxii reseruetur.
祂說:「我要把凡有血氣的一切興起從地面除滅。」哦,天上之言何等美麗,若有人以虔誠心靈合宜的悟性來省察它們!神惱怒我們的罪,卻不忘記祂的憐憫:祂威嚇要施刑罰,卻沒有允許毀滅;祂節制報應,收回嚴厲。祂說要除滅肉體,不是從地上,而是從地面除滅。祂搖落花朵,卻保存根基:祂容許人類本質的力量存留在深處,雖在表面勞苦;它在內裡無感於受苦地存留,並被保全免受傷害,以替補那些不至於陷在罪責中的人。
'And I will blot out,' He says, 'every uprising of flesh from the face of the earth.' O beauty of heavenly words, if anyone should examine them with the becoming understanding of a devout mind! God is indignant at our sins, yet He does not forget His mercy: He threatens punishment, but He has not permitted destruction: He tempers vengeance, He calls back severity. He says He will blot out the flesh, not from the earth, but from the face of the earth. He shakes off the flower, He preserves the roots: He allows the strength of human substance to remain in the depths, though it labour on the surface; within it endures impassible, and is preserved free from harm for the replacement of those who are not liable to guilt.
11:76
pulchre autem posuit delebo tamquam litterarum apices, qui delentur sine fraude librorum et sine inminutione tabularum. atramentum deletur, sed lignum manet. delentur elementa, ut scribantur plerumque meliora, atramentum tollitur, substantia non exterminatur. \'delebo\' inquit \'corruptelam carnis, ut scribam incorruptionem. delebo resurrectionem carnis a facie terrae, ut scribam in caelestibus resurgentes. delebo de libro terrae, ut scribam in libro uitae\'. deleantur, domine meus, domine, deleantur cito elementa ferri, ut scribantur elementa Christi. aboleatur resurrectio terrena, ut caelestis gratia redundet. ueni, Moyses, praepara gremium, legem accipe, suscipe apices, quos iam miseri..
此外,祂優美地說「我要除滅」,彷彿那些字母的小筆畫,它們被抹去卻不損及書卷、不減損版牘。墨水被抹去,木頭卻留存。那些筆畫被抹去,好叫通常更好的得以寫上;墨水被除去,其本體卻不被毀滅。祂說:「我要除滅肉體的敗壞,好叫我寫上不朽壞。我要把肉體的興起從地面除滅,好叫我寫上那些在天上復活的人。我要從地的冊子上除滅,好叫我寫在生命冊上。」我的主啊,主啊,願鐵的筆畫被除滅,願它們速速被抹去,好叫基督的筆畫得以寫上。願屬地的復活被廢去,好叫屬天的恩典滿溢。來吧,摩西,預備你的衣襟,領受律法,取起那些字符,就是如今那些可憐的人……
Beautifully, moreover, He set down 'I will blot out,' as it were the small marks of letters, which are blotted out without harm to the books and without diminution of the tablets. The ink is blotted out, but the wood remains. The elements are blotted out, that better ones may generally be written; the ink is removed, the substance is not destroyed. 'I will blot out,' He says, 'the corruption of the flesh, that I may write incorruption. I will blot out the resurrection of flesh from the face of the earth, that I may write those who rise again among the heavenly. I will blot out from the book of earth, that I may write in the book of life.' Let them be blotted out, my Lord, Lord, let the elements of iron be quickly blotted out, that the elements of Christ may be written. Let the earthly resurrection be abolished, that the heavenly grace may overflow. Come, Moses, prepare your lap, receive the Law, take up the characters, which now the wretched...
11:77
coria diuina non deleat. suscipe tabulas, quas dominus statuat in aeternum. utinam ipse non frangas! et ipsas mihi mea culpa sustulerat, nisi dominus reddidisset. iure quidem, Moyses, indignatus es, ne haberent diuina priuilegia qui non deferrent obsequia, sed puto quod non mihi eas, sed Iudaeis fregeris. fregisti Iudaeis, recepisti mihi. fractae sunt priores, ut posteriores manerent. fregisti eas in pectoribus Iudaeorum; quid enim proderat ut tabulas tenerent, quarum praescripta tenere non possent? ecce secundas tabulas dicunt se tenere, sed non tenent. dicunt se legere diuina elementa, sed non legunt. digito dei scriptas esse tabulas Moyses dicit:
願它不要抹去那神聖的皮卷。取起那些版牘,就是主要永遠立定的。但願你自己不要打碎它們!然而是我自己的過錯把它們從我這裡奪去,若非主將它們歸還。摩西啊,你的惱怒確實是公正的,免得那些不獻上順服的人擁有神聖的特權;但我認為你打碎它們不是針對我,而是針對猶太人。你為猶太人打碎了它們,卻為我接回了它們。先前的被打碎,好叫後來的得以存留。你在猶太人的心中打碎了它們;因為他們既不能持守版牘上的誡命,持有版牘又有何益?看哪,他們說自己持有第二對版牘,卻並不持有。他們說自己誦讀那神聖的字符,卻並不誦讀。摩西說,這版牘是用神的指頭寫成的:
Let it not blot out the divine skins. Take up the tablets which the Lord may set up forever. Would that you yourself may not break them! Yet my own fault had taken these away from me, had not the Lord restored them. Rightly indeed, Moses, were you indignant, lest those should possess the divine privileges who did not render obedience; but I think that you broke them not against me, but against the Jews. You broke them for the Jews, you received them back for me. The first were broken, that the latter might remain. You broke them in the breasts of the Jews; for what did it profit that they should hold the tablets, whose precepts they could not hold? Behold, they say they hold the second tablets, but they do not hold them. They say they read the divine characters, but they do not read them. Moses says that the tablets were written by the finger of God:
11:78
illi digitum dei non legunt, ferrum legunt. atramentum uident, spiritum dei non uident: sed ecclesia nescit atramentum, spiritum nouit. ideoque Paulus nouit scribere non atramento, sed spiritu dei uiui. o sacrilegum ineptum populum Iudaeorum! homo spiritu dei scribit et homo sub lege nutritus, et illi uolunt deum atramento scripsisse, non spiritu. ergo, ut ad superiora redeamus, delet deus resurrectionem carnis tamquam apicum scriptionem. quo declaratur quod superfluam hominum natiuitatem propter impietatem eius deleuerit specie litterarum, substantiam autem et conuersationem generis seruarit humani uelut perpetuitate tabularum, ut ex ea semen reliquum pullularet.
他們不誦讀神的指頭,卻誦讀鐵;他們看見墨水,卻不看見神的靈。但教會不認得墨水,卻認識聖靈。因此保羅曉得書寫不是用墨水,而是用永生神的靈。哦,猶太人這褻瀆而愚蠢的百姓!一個人憑著神的靈書寫,且是在律法之下受養育的人;他們卻硬要說神是用墨水、而非用聖靈書寫的。所以,回到上文所說的,神除滅肉體的興起,彷彿是字母的書寫。藉此宣告:祂以字母為象徵,因人的悖逆而除滅了那多餘的出生,卻彷彿藉版牘的長存,保存了人類的本體與生活方式,好叫餘剩的種子從中萌發。
They do not read the finger of God, they read the iron. They see the ink, they do not see the Spirit of God: but the Church knows not the ink, it knows the Spirit. And therefore Paul knew how to write not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God. O sacrilegious and foolish people of the Jews! A man writes by the Spirit of God, even a man nurtured under the Law, and they would have it that God wrote with ink, not with the Spirit. Therefore, to return to what is above, God blots out the resurrection of flesh as it were the writing of letters. By which it is declared that He blotted out the superfluous birth of men because of its impiety under the figure of letters, but preserved the substance and the conversation of the human race as it were by the permanence of the tablets, that from it the remaining seed might sprout forth.
11:79
cui sententiae conuenire etiam illud uidetur, quia ait: delebo inquit omnem resurrectionem carnis. resurrectioni autem communi usu naturae contraria uidetur esse purgatio, quia purgatione reciditur et reprimitur resurrectionis luxuria. omne tamen quod purgatur speciem amittit, substantiam suam seruat atque meliorat. repressit igitur dominus iam purgatione diluuii corporeum usum conuersationemque generationis eius, quae degenerauerat a decore naturae et accepti muneris uenustate. haec secundum litteram. quod autem ad altiorem pertinet sensum, diluuii species typus est purgationis animae nostrae. itaque cum mens nostra [corporalibus-.
與這意義似乎也相合的是,祂說:「我要除滅凡有血氣的一切興起。」如今按自然的常理,潔淨似乎與生長相反,因為藉潔淨,那繁茂的蕪雜被削減並壓抑。然而凡被潔淨的,雖失去其外表,卻保存其本體,並變得更好。因此主藉洪水的潔淨,壓抑了那世代肉體的習用與生活方式——它已從自然的端美、從所領受恩賜的美麗中墮落。這是按字面的解釋。但就更高層的意義而言,洪水的形像乃是我們靈魂得潔淨的預表。於是,當我們的心思〔從肉體……〕
To this meaning it seems also to accord that He says: 'I will blot out every uprising of flesh.' Now to resurrection, by the common usage of nature, purgation seems to be contrary, because by purgation the rankness of growth is cut back and repressed. Yet everything that is purged loses its appearance, preserves its substance, and is made better. The Lord therefore by the purgation of the flood repressed the bodily use and the conversation of that generation, which had degenerated from the comeliness of nature and from the beauty of the gift received. This is according to the letter. But as for what pertains to the higher sense, the figure of the flood is a type of the purgation of our soul. And so, when our mind [from bodily...]
11:80
] se a mundi istius inlecebris, quibus ante delectabatur, abluerit, bonis cogitationibus ueteris conluuiem cupiditatis absterget tamquam purioribus absorbens aquis turbidorum prius amaritudinem fluentorum. Et fecit inquit omnia Noe quae mandauit ei dominus deus. iustus mandata accipit, seruus imperia. hic amici censetur loco qui fecerit quaecumque exsequenda susceperit, ille qui nutat obsequiis oneri seruitutis addicitur. denique et dominus Iesus dicit in euangelio: uos amici mei estis, si feceritis quae ego praecipio uobis. iam non dicam uos seruos. mandatur ergo ut amico, mandatur ut ei qui ualida caritate, sobrio consilio quae mandata sunt exequatur. nec fefellit dominum iudicium suum.
〔靈魂〕已把自己從這世界的引誘——就是它從前所喜悅的——洗淨,便藉著美善的思念,抹去情慾的舊污穢,彷彿用較純淨的水吸去先前混濁水流的苦澀。經上說:「挪亞照著主神所吩咐他的,都做了。」義人領受命令,奴僕則視之為差遣。凡照所承擔當辦的去行的,被算作朋友;凡在順服上猶疑的,則被歸入奴役的重擔之下。簡言之,主耶穌也在福音書中說:「你們若遵行我所吩咐你們的,就是我的朋友。如今我不再稱你們為奴僕。」因此這吩咐是給朋友的,是給那以堅強的愛德和清明的判斷遵行所吩咐之事的人。他的判斷也沒有欺瞞主。
...] has washed itself from the allurements of this world, in which it formerly delighted, by good thoughts it wipes away the old filth of desire, as it were absorbing with purer waters the bitterness of the previously turbid streams. 'And Noah did,' it says, 'all that the Lord God commanded him.' The just man receives commands, the slave commands as orders. He is reckoned in the place of a friend who does whatever he has undertaken to carry out; he who wavers in obedience is consigned to the burden of servitude. In short, the Lord Jesus too says in the Gospel: 'You are my friends, if you do what I command you. Now I will not call you slaves.' It is commanded, therefore, as to a friend; it is commanded to him who carries out what is commanded with strong charity and sober counsel. Nor did his judgment deceive the Lord.
11:81
inpleuit iustus uniuersa, non partem, sed uniuersa quae mandata sunt ei, et ideo scripturae diuinae accipit testimonium. nec superfluum putes quia simul posuit dominum et deumnam et deus in domino et dominus in deo —, sed ut patris et filii intellegas commune praeceptum. aliqui tamen ante nos sic interpretati sunt, eo quod dominum et deum hoc loco dicendo et uindicaturi et ignoturi geminam expresserit potestatem et, quia hic uindicat prius in peccatores, ideo ante dominum dixerit, quoniam uero postea ut iusti seminarium propagetur indulget. ideo deum postea nominauerit. denique facturus mundum deus dicitur: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram. et dixit deus: fiat lux.
義人成全了一切,不是一部分,而是凡吩咐他的全都成全,因此他得到神聖經文的見證。你也不要以為經文把「主」和「神」並列是多餘的——因為神在主裡,主也在神裡——而是為叫你明白父與子的誡命是共同的。然而在我們之前有些人是這樣解釋的:在此處說「主與神」,乃是表達了一位將施報應者與一位將施赦免者的雙重權能;因為在此祂首先向罪人施報應,所以先說「主」;但因後來為使義人的苗圃得以繁衍,祂施恩寬容,所以後來才稱「神」。簡言之,當祂將要造世界時,被稱為神:「起初神創造天地。神說:要有光。」
The just man fulfilled all things, not a part, but all that were commanded him, and therefore he receives the testimony of divine Scripture. Nor should you think it superfluous that Scripture set together 'Lord' and 'God' — for both God is in the Lord and the Lord is in God —, but that you may understand the precept of the Father and of the Son to be common. Some, however, before us have interpreted it thus, that by saying 'Lord and God' in this place, He expressed a twofold power both of one who would avenge and of one who would pardon; and because here He first avenges upon sinners, therefore He said 'Lord' first, but because afterward, that the seed-plot of the just might be propagated, He shows indulgence, therefore He named 'God' afterward. In short, when about to make the world, He is called God: 'In the beginning God made heaven and earth. And God said: Let there be light.'
11:82
Est etiam illa non perfunctoria consideratio, quod sescentesimo anno Noe < mense septimo> uicensima et septima mensis fit diluuium. septimum mensem uerni esse temporis non ambigitur, quando augentur nascentia, ager parturit, terrarum pariter atque animantium fetura se fundit. tunc ergo fecit diluuium, quando dolor maior eorum foret qui in sua abundantia puniebantur, tunc ultio terribilior tamquam dicentis dei: \'ecce omnia secundum liberalitatis diuinae prouidentiae gratiam diues natura generauit, omnia in usum hominum germinauit terra fecundior. segetes spectantur tritici, hordeo campi replentur, comae arborum uenturi fructus floribus uestiuntur:
還有這非泛泛的考量:在挪亞六百歲那年,七月二十七日,洪水來了。七月屬於春季是毫無疑問的,那時生長之物增長,田地產育,地上與活物的胎產一同迸發。所以祂在那時降下洪水,正是那些在豐裕中受罰者的悲傷將更深的時候,那時報應更為可怕,彷彿神在說:「看哪,富饒的大自然憑著神聖眷顧之慷慨的恩典生出了萬物,土地為人的使用萌生了萬物,這豐產的地:麥田的莊稼可觀,田野滿了大麥,樹木的枝葉、將要結的果子披上了花朵:
There is also this consideration, not perfunctory, that in the six-hundredth year of Noah, in the seventh month, on the twenty-seventh of the month, the flood came. That the seventh month was of the spring season is not doubted, when growing things increase, the field labours in birth, and the offspring of lands and of living creatures alike pours itself forth. Then therefore He made the flood, when the grief of those who were being punished in their abundance would be greater, then the vengeance more terrible, as though God were saying: 'Behold, by the grace of divine providence's generosity rich nature has brought forth all things, the earth has germinated all things for the use of men, the bountiful earth: crops of wheat are beheld, the fields are filled with barley, the tresses of the trees, the fruits to come, are clothed with blossoms:'
11:83
non deest terra obsequiis suis, non bestiae muneribus suis, quae sollemnes soluuntur in partus, ut homini nihil desit: homo solus partibus suis deest, nescit auctorem suum, a quo ei omnia ministrantur, neglegit conditorem. despicit homo remuneratorem suum, cum deus opus suum non despexerit. pereant cum homine omnia, propter quem nata sunt omnia. in suis diuitiis consumatur homo, cum sua dote moriatur\'. nihil ante hominem terra deliquerat, nullis errauit in fructibus: in homine solo se degenerasse cognoscit, spinas et tribulos pro fructibus ferens. quod solum munus admirabile est, principale mentis interiit. cur igitur omnia illa seruantur?
土地不缺乏其服事,野獸不缺乏其賜予,牠們按慣常的胎產被釋放出來,好叫人毫無缺乏:唯獨人虧缺了自己的本分,他不認識自己的創造者——萬物都是從祂供應給他的,他卻忽略了造他的主。人藐視那賞賜他的,而神卻未曾藐視祂的工作。願萬物與人一同滅亡,因為萬物都是為他而生的。願人在自己的財富中被吞滅,願他與自己的嫁妝同死。」在人之前,土地絲毫未曾犯過,在任何果子上未曾出錯:唯獨在人身上,它認出自己已經墮落,生出荊棘和蒺藜代替果子。那唯一奇妙的恩賜——心智的首要部分——已經喪亡。那麼為何那一切之物仍被保存?
The earth is not lacking in its services, nor the beasts in their gifts, which are loosed in their accustomed births, so that nothing should be lacking to man: man alone is lacking to his own parts, he knows not his Author, from whom all things are ministered to him, he neglects his Creator. Man despises his Rewarder, while God has not despised His work. Let all things perish with man, for whose sake all things were born. Let man be consumed in his own riches, let him die with his own dowry.' The earth had in no way transgressed before man, it had erred in no fruits: in man alone it recognizes that it has degenerated, bearing thorns and thistles instead of fruits. That which alone is the wondrous gift, the principal part of the mind, has perished. Why then are all those things preserved?
11:84
ideo non post collectos fructus infunditur aqua, ne beneficium magis quam diluuium terra sentiret. denique uerno apud Aegyptios tempore, sed mense diuerso Nilus exundat, ut iaciendis seminibus terra mollescat et blandiore sinu, clementiore gremio semina missa suscipiat. quod autem sescentesimo anno Noe fit diluuium, illud uidetur ostendere, quia sexto die Adam creatus est. idem numerus, hoc est qui par dicitur, et in auctore et in reparatore seruatur, quia fons sexagesimi et sescentesimi sextus est numerus. idem autem et primus et septimus mensis dicitur.
因此水不是在果子收割之後才傾倒下來,免得土地感受到的是恩惠而非洪水。簡言之,在埃及人中,尼羅河也是在春季泛濫,雖在不同的月份,好叫土地為播種而鬆軟,並以更柔和的胸懷、更慈愛的懷抱接納所撒下的種子。但洪水在挪亞六百歲那年來到,似乎顯示這一點:亞當是在第六日被造的。同一個數目,即所謂「偶數」者,在那創始者與那復興者身上都得以保存,因為六十與六百的本源都是數目六。而同一個月既被稱為第一個月,又被稱為第七個月。
Therefore the water is not poured out after the fruits have been gathered, lest the earth should feel a benefit rather than a flood. In short, among the Egyptians the Nile overflows in the spring season, though in a different month, so that the earth may soften for the casting of seeds and receive the seeds sent forth in a more gentle bosom, a more kindly lap. But that the flood comes in the six-hundredth year of Noah seems to show this, that on the sixth day Adam was created. The same number, that is, the one called 'even,' is preserved both in the author and in the restorer, because the source of the sixtieth and of the six-hundredth is the number six. And the same month is called both the first and the seventh.
11:85
sed magis primum obseruare debemus quod post diluuium uerno tempore colendorum cura reparetur agrorum et placidi atque uberis soli incipiat fetura procedere. quo significatur numquam deum eo numero uel tempore interitum hominum fuisse facturum. quo fecit exordium, nisi inmanibus delictis esset offensus. simul ueniam temporis et numeri ratio promittit, quod etiam iratus admoneatur tam praecedentibus causis beneficiorum suorum, ut non penitus deleat eorum substantiam quos ipse donauit. Et erupti sunt omnes fontes abyssi et cataractae caeli apertae sunt.
但我們首先更應留意:洪水之後,在春季,耕作田地的勞作得以更新,那平靜而肥沃土壤的產育開始萌發。藉此表明:神絕不會在那數目或那季節——就是祂在其中造作萬物之始的那季節——降下人的毀滅,除非祂被那些可怕的過犯所觸怒。同時,季節與數目的盤算許下了赦免,因為祂縱然發怒,也被祂自己恩惠的這許多先前緣由所提醒,以致不徹底除滅祂親自所賜予者的本體。「大淵的泉源都裂開了,天上的閘門也敞開了。」
But we ought rather to observe first that after the flood, in the spring season, the care of the fields to be tilled is renewed, and the offspring of the calm and fertile soil begins to come forth. By which it is signified that God would never have brought about the destruction of men in that number or that season — in which He made the beginning of things — unless He had been offended by monstrous transgressions. At the same time the reckoning of the season and of the number promises pardon, in that even when angered He is admonished by such preceding causes of His own benefits, so as not utterly to blot out the substance of those whom He Himself bestowed. 'And all the fountains of the abyss were broken up, and the cataracts of heaven were opened.'
11:86
uim diluuii scriptura conuenienter expressit dicens caelum et terram pariter esse commota, ex quibus elementis constat istius mundi omne principium. undique ergo influentibus aquarum molibus conclusum genus hominum perurgetur. haec secundum litteram. quod autem ad altiorem pertinet sensum, caeli symbolo mens humana significatur, terrae autem appellatione corpus et sensus. magna igitur naufragia, quando mentis pariter et corporis sensuumque omnium turbo et procella miscentur. diligenter dicta pensemus. plerumque fraus mentis et dolus suum exercent uenenum, sed tamen sobrietas corporis et continentia obumbrant mentis improbitatem.
經文恰當地表達了洪水的威力,說天和地一同被攪動——這世界的一切起源就是由這些元素構成的。因此,水的洪流從四面湧入,被圍困的人類受到猛烈逼迫。這是按字面的解釋。但就更高層的意義而言,以天為象徵表示人的心思,以地之名稱表示身體與感官。因此,當心思、身體與一切感官的旋風和暴風一同交織時,便有極大的沉船之災。讓我們仔細衡量這些話。心思的欺詐與詭計往往施放其毒,然而身體的清醒與節制卻遮蔽了心思的邪惡。
Scripture fittingly expressed the force of the flood by saying that heaven and earth alike were stirred up, of which elements every beginning of this world consists. From every side, therefore, with the masses of waters flowing in, the enclosed race of men is pressed hard. This is according to the letter. But as for what pertains to the higher sense, by the symbol of heaven the human mind is signified, by the appellation of earth the body and the senses. Great therefore are the shipwrecks, when the whirlwind and storm of mind and body and of all the senses are mingled alike. Let us weigh the words carefully. Often the fraud of the mind and its deceit exercise their poison, yet the sobriety of the body and continence overshadow the wickedness of the mind.
11:87
frequenter incerto fidei atque opinionis suae mens lubrica est, sed tamen caro deliciis et luxuria uacat, ut frugalitas errorem mentis excuset, sicut multi sunt haereticorum, qui praetendere nolunt corporis continentiam, ut adsertioni suae fidem testimonio sobriae carnis adquirant. etsi sensu lubrici, tamen quo minus turpes aliquanto excusabiliores habentur.
心思往往因其信念與意見的不確定而滑溜不定,然而肉體卻遠離享樂與奢侈,以致節儉為心思的錯誤遮羞,正如異端中有許多人不願展現身體的節制,以致藉清醒肉體的見證為自己的主張贏取信任。他們縱然在悟性上滑溜不定,然而既稍微不那麼卑下,便被認為稍可原宥一些。
Frequently the mind is slippery through the uncertainty of its faith and opinion, yet the flesh is free from delights and luxury, so that frugality excuses the error of the mind, as there are many among the heretics who are unwilling to put forward bodily continence in order that they may gain credence for their assertion by the testimony of sober flesh. Even though slippery in their understanding, yet inasmuch as they are somewhat less base, they are held to be somewhat more excusable.
11:88
cum autem uenena mentis et contagia corporeae obscenitatis sensum omnem uigoremque confundunt atque animus incerto lubricus motu, malitiae faetidus atramento, crudelitatis furore succensus etiam corporalibus flagitiis incitatur, auarus quoque affectus inpatiens mediocrium facultatum luxuriae cupiditate effundendique libidine praecipitatur in facinus adpetendae salutis alienae, tunc magnum est diluuium omnibus pariter ingruentibus passionibus, tunc se insipientia iniustitia temeritas inprobitas perfidia de superiore parte tamquam cataractae mentis uidentur effundere.
但當心思的毒與身體淫穢的傳染攪亂了一切感官與活力,當靈魂以不確定的動盪滑溜不定、被惡毒的墨水所污、被殘酷的狂怒所點燃,甚至被催逼去行身體上的暴行;當貪婪的情慾也不安於微薄的資財,被奢侈的慾望與揮霍的放縱拋入罪惡之中,渴求奪取他人的福祉——那時便有大洪水,一切情慾一同湧入;那時愚妄、不義、輕率、邪惡、奸詐似乎從上部傾瀉而出,彷彿心思的閘門。
But when the poisons of the mind and the contagions of bodily obscenity confound every sense and vigour, and the soul, slippery with uncertain motion, foul with the ink of malice, kindled with the fury of cruelty, is incited even to bodily outrages; when greedy desire too, impatient of modest means, is hurled into crime by the lust of luxury and the wantonness of squandering, in the craving to seize another's welfare — then there is a great flood, with all the passions rushing in alike; then folly, injustice, rashness, wickedness, and treachery seem to pour themselves out from the upper part, as it were the cataracts of the mind.
11:89
inde erumpunt de corporis fonte terreni libido temulentia luxuria, postremo diuersorum criminum prolapsiones, quae penitus et corporis robur et uigorem mentis effeminant. I Et clausit deus a foris arcam. sermo manifestus est secundum litteram. claudenda fuit arca et tuto saepienda munimine, ne eam uaga diluuii fluenta penetrarent. altioris quoque sensus non incongrua interpretatio, si corpus humanum, cui arca haec quae describitur figuratur, saeptum corio iudicemus a frigore aestuque defendi, quod artifex deus ad omnium membrorum protectionem naturalibus uestiuit exuuiis et quodam circumfuso induit operimento, ut neque frigore congelescat nec aestiuo calore soluatur.
於是從屬地身體的泉源迸發出情慾、醉酒、奢華,最終是各樣罪行的墮落,這些徹底削弱了身體的力量與心思的活力。「神從外面把方舟關上了。」按字面而言,這話是明白的。方舟必須被關上,並以保護穩妥地圍護,免得洪水漂蕩的水流穿透它。就更高層的意義作一解釋也並非不協調:若我們判定,這所描述的方舟所象徵的人類身體,以皮膚為圍護,得以抵禦寒冷與炎熱——這是那位工匠之神為保護一切肢體,以天然的外衣加以遮蓋,並彷彿以一層環裹的覆蓋物加以披戴,好叫它既不因寒冷而凍結,也不因夏日炎熱而消散。
Thence there burst forth from the fountain of the earthly body lust, drunkenness, luxury, and finally the downfalls of various crimes, which utterly emasculate both the strength of the body and the vigour of the mind. 'And God shut the ark from without.' The discourse is manifest according to the letter. The ark had to be shut and securely fenced with a protection, lest the wandering streams of the flood should penetrate it. Nor is an interpretation of the higher sense incongruous, if we judge that the human body, which is figured by this ark that is described, fenced with skin, is defended from cold and heat, which the artificer God clothed for the protection of all the members with natural coverings and clad as it were with an enveloping garment, so that it should neither congeal with cold nor be dissolved by summer heat.
11:90
exundauit igitur aqua et leuauit arcam, et ferebatur super summum aquarum. non inmerito exundauit aqua, quando caeli cataractae apertae sunt et de terra rupti sunt fontes aquarum et flumina. quod magna enphasi dictum est. ubi enim eruptio, ibi inreuocabilis effusio sit necesse est, nec retineri facilis ingentium prolapsio fluentorum. manifestum igitur quod scriptum est. uerum si altius spectandum putes, caro nostra diuersis agitatur et freti modo fluctuat passionibus, quibus huc atque illuc tamquam super undas molestiarum suarum nunc fame, nunc siti, nunc cupiditate, nunc gaudio, nunc dolore iactatur.
於是水泛濫起來,把方舟托起,方舟漂浮在水面之上。水泛濫並非無因,正當天上的閘門敞開、地上水的泉源與江河裂開之時。這話是極有力地說出的。因為哪裡有裂開迸發,哪裡就必有無法挽回的傾瀉,巨大水流的傾覆也不易被攔阻。所以經上所寫的是明白的。但你若認為當更深一層地看,我們的肉體被各樣情慾攪動,如海一般起伏,被拋來拋去,彷彿在它自己諸般苦惱的波浪之上,時而因飢餓,時而因乾渴,時而因慾望,時而因喜樂,時而因憂愁。
The water therefore overflowed and lifted the ark, and it was borne upon the top of the waters. Not without cause did the water overflow, when the cataracts of heaven were opened and the fountains of waters and the rivers were broken up from the earth. This was said with great emphasis. For where there is a bursting forth, there an irrevocable outpouring must of necessity be, nor is the downfall of huge streams easily restrained. Manifest, therefore, is what is written. But if you think it should be regarded more deeply, our flesh is agitated by diverse passions and fluctuates like a sea, by which it is tossed hither and thither as it were upon the waves of its own troubles, now by hunger, now by thirst, now by desire, now by joy, now by grief.
11:91
Illud quoque non praetermittendum arbitror, quia scriptura non praeteriit, quantis numero cubitis aqua super terram fuerit; quindecim enim cubitis super excelsos montes aquam fuisse dixit. simplex itaque intellectus patet, allegoria autem quinque sensus conplectitur, qui sunt in corpore nostro uelut excelsi montes, qui hanc carnem passionum obumbrant et plerumque incursantur bestiis et exagitantur condensa et opaca eorum. unde et dominus per nationum credentium fidem ueniens ad ecclesiam suam uenit a Libano, sicut ait Ambacum propheta dicens: dominus a Libano ueniet, a monte umbroso et opaco. ecclesia quoque uenit a Libano, sicut habent Cantica canticorum. ita enim legimus:
我認為這一點也不可略過:經文並未略過水在地上高出幾肘;因為它說,水高過高山十五肘。簡單的理解是明白的,但寓意則包含五官——它們在我們身體裡如同高山,遮蔽這充滿情慾的肉體,並常被野獸侵襲,被其茂密幽暗的叢林所騷擾。因此主也藉著信主之外邦的信德來到祂的教會,是從黎巴嫩而來,正如先知哈巴谷所說:「主要從黎巴嫩而來,從幽蔭蒼鬱之山而來。」教會也從黎巴嫩而來,正如雅歌所載。我們是這樣讀到的:
I think this too should not be passed over, that Scripture did not pass over how many cubits in number the water was above the earth; for it said that the water was fifteen cubits above the high mountains. The simple understanding is plain, but the allegory embraces the five senses, which are in our body like high mountains, which overshadow this flesh of passions and are often assailed by beasts and harried by their thickets and shades. Whence the Lord too, coming to His Church through the faith of the believing nations, came from Lebanon, as the prophet Habakkuk says: 'The Lord shall come from Lebanon, from a shady and dark mountain.' The Church too comes from Lebanon, as the Song of Songs has it. For thus we read:
11:92
ades huc a Libano, sponsa, ades huc a Libano. transibis et pertransibis a principio fidei, a cubilibus leonum et montibus pardorum, quod gentiles populi. qui uelut bestialium passionum graues patiebantur incursus, nunc altitudine fidei et sublimitate deuotionis emineant. per hos igitur montes Christus aduenit comprimens euangelicis disputationibus ferocis istius corporis motus atque illam altitudinem cordis et se extollentem superbiam oboedientia et humilitate sui destruens, meritoque fructus mansuetudinis ferre coeperunt quos ante grauium passionum diluuia subruebant.
「我的新婦,從黎巴嫩到這裡來,從黎巴嫩到這裡來。你要從信德的起頭、從獅子的洞、從豹子的山越過、穿越」——這些就是外邦的民族。他們從前彷彿遭受獸性情慾的沉重侵襲,如今卻因信德的崇高與虔誠的卓越而顯為尊貴。因此基督藉著這些山而來,以祂福音的辯論抑制這身體狂暴的衝動,並以祂的順服和謙卑摧毀那心中的高傲與自高的驕傲;於是那些從前被沉重情慾的洪水所淹沒的人,理所當然地開始結出溫柔的果子。
'Come hither from Lebanon, my bride, come hither from Lebanon. You shall pass over and pass through, from the beginning of faith, from the dens of lions and the mountains of leopards' — which are the Gentile peoples. They who, as it were, suffered the grievous assaults of bestial passions, now stand eminent by the loftiness of faith and the sublimity of devotion. Through these mountains, therefore, Christ came, restraining by His evangelical disputations the fierce motions of this body, and destroying by His obedience and humility that loftiness of heart and the pride that exalts itself; and rightly they began to bear the fruits of meekness whom before the floods of grievous passions overwhelmed.
11:93
de numero autem cubitorum sic quidam ante nos aestimauerunt, quod quinque sensus triplicem collectionem habeant, eo quod uisus uisibile uidet et auditus audibile audit et odoratus odorabile odoratur et gustatus gustabile gustat et tactus quod tangendi substantiae subiacet tangit. ideo quinque sensus tripliciter aestimati sunt uel secundum illud: scribe tibi tripliciter. ego tamen illud commodius puto, ut sensus terreni hominis atque animalis et spiritalis accipiam, quos illa diluuii fluenta transcenderint. Mento mortua est omnis caro, quae mouebatur. quod et secundum litteram liquet et proprie ac naturaliter carnis corruptelam indicio procellosae commotionis expressit.
關於肘數,在我們之前有些人是這樣判斷的:五官各有三重的聚合,因為視覺看見可見之物,聽覺聽見可聞之物,嗅覺嗅聞可嗅之物,味覺嘗試可嘗之物,觸覺觸摸那居於觸摸本體之下之物。因此五官被算為三重的,或按那句話:「你要為自己三重地寫下。」然而我認為這更為合宜:我把屬地之人、屬血氣之人、屬靈之人的感官分別理解——那洪水的水流越過了它們。「凡有血氣會動的都死了。」這既按字面是清楚的,也恰當而自然地藉那暴風動盪的標記,表達了肉體的敗壞。
Concerning the number of cubits, some before us have judged thus, that the five senses have a threefold gathering, because sight sees the visible, and hearing hears the audible, and smell smells the smellable, and taste tastes the tasteable, and touch touches that which lies beneath the substance of touching. Therefore the five senses are reckoned threefold, or according to that saying: 'Write for yourself threefold.' I, however, think this more suitable, that I take the senses of the earthly, the animal, and the spiritual man, which those streams of the flood transcended. 'Then died all flesh that moved.' This is clear both according to the letter and properly and naturally expressed the corruption of the flesh by the token of the stormy commotion.
11:94
commotio enim uitiosa non est nisi per affectus corruptionem; mouet enim uoluptates caro et ipsa uoluptatibus commouetur, talis autem commotio corruptelam creat. causa ergo corruptelae commotio istius mundi est, per quam anima uniuscuiusque degenerat. cum enim uitiosae passiones mentem mouent, corruptela generatur; cum excitantur studia uirtutum, disciplinae profectus est. omnis igitur qui erat in arida mortuus est: nec enim poterant non mori quos tanti diluuii unda demerserat. hoc secundum scriptum seriemque uerborum.
因為動盪若非藉著情感的敗壞,便不算邪惡;因為肉體攪動快樂,自己也被快樂所攪動,而這樣的動盪便造成敗壞。所以敗壞的原因乃是這世界的動盪,每個人的靈魂藉此墮落。因為當邪惡的情慾攪動心思時,敗壞便生出;當諸德的追求被激發時,便有操練的長進。「所以凡在旱地上的都死了」:因為那麼大洪水的浪所淹沒的,斷不能不死。這是按文字與字句的次序而言。
For commotion is not vicious except through the corruption of the affections; for the flesh moves the pleasures, and is itself moved by the pleasures, and such commotion creates corruption. The cause therefore of corruption is the commotion of this world, through which the soul of each one degenerates. For when vicious passions move the mind, corruption is generated; when the pursuits of the virtues are aroused, there is progress of discipline. 'Everything therefore that was on the dry land died': for those whom the wave of so great a flood had submerged could not but die. This is according to the writing and the sequence of words.
11:95
ceterum si allegoriam quaeras, non est dubium quia exemplo ligni aridioris, quod simul ut lambere coeperit ignis exurit, ita anima, nisi diuersarum umescat rore uirtutum poculo quodam inrigata sapientiae et fonte iustitiae atque inriguo castitatis, tamquam arefacta radice uitali cupiditatum deflagrat incendio uel profluuio carnis inlisa procumbit. unde semper epulari debet animus bonorum operum cogitationes, ut prudentiae suco mens inebriata pinguescat, quo non facile diluuii corporalis cedat iniuriae atque arido incuriae situ euirata moriatur.
但你若尋求寓意,毫無疑問,正如以較乾的木頭為例——火一開始舔它就把它燒盡——靈魂也是如此:除非它被諸般德行的甘露所滋潤,彷彿被某種智慧之杯、公義之泉與貞潔之灌溉所澆灌,否則便如同生命的根已乾枯一般,被慾望之火焚燒,或被肉體的流溢所擊而傾倒。因此靈魂當常以善工的思念為筵席,好叫心思被審慎的汁液所灌醉而豐肥,藉此不至於輕易屈服於身體洪水的傷害,也不至於被疏懶乾枯的污穢所削弱而死亡。
But if you seek the allegory, there is no doubt that, by the example of a drier piece of wood, which as soon as the fire begins to lick it is burned up, so the soul, unless it grows moist with the dew of the various virtues, watered as by a certain cup of wisdom and by the fountain of justice and the irrigation of chastity, blazes up with the fire of desires as though its vital root were dried out, or, struck by the flux of the flesh, falls down. Whence the soul ought always to feast on the thoughts of good works, that the mind, made drunk with the juice of prudence, may grow fat, whereby it may not easily yield to the injury of the bodily flood, and may not, enervated by the dry squalor of negligence, die.
11:96
ideoque nos admonet dominus a fonte sapientiae non recedere, pocula uirtutis haurire, ne quis sole iniquitatis arescat et procellam persecutionis sustinere non possit. scriptum est enim: quodsi in umido hoc faciunt, in arido quid fiet? Deleuit inquit deus omne quod erat super faciem terrae. scripti euidens explanatio, allegoria autem expositam nobis declarat superbiam, quae se extollit in hac terrena fragilique substantia et inmemor diuinorum humana despiciens ipsum adrogantis uiri habitum incessumque deformat. quales describit Esaias Iudaeae filias oculorum micantes nutibus et alta se ceruice iactantes.
因此主勸誡我們,不要離開智慧的泉源,要汲取德行之杯,免得有人被罪孽的烈日曬乾,以致不能忍受逼迫的風暴。因為經上記著:「他們既在青木上做這些事,那在枯木上又將如何呢?」經上說:「神除滅了凡在地面上的一切。」這是經文顯明的解釋;但寓意則向我們呈現所顯露的驕傲——它在這屬地而脆弱的本體中自高,不顧念神聖之事,藐視屬人之事,並使那傲慢之人的姿態與步伐變得醜陋。正如以賽亞所描述猶大的女子,眼目傳神地閃動,昂著高傲的頸項招搖。
And therefore the Lord admonishes us not to withdraw from the fountain of wisdom, to draw the cups of virtue, lest anyone be dried up by the sun of iniquity and be unable to endure the storm of persecution. For it is written: 'If they do these things in the green wood, what shall be done in the dry?' 'God blotted out,' it says, 'everything that was upon the face of the earth.' This is the evident explanation of the writing; but the allegory sets forth to us pride displayed, which exalts itself in this earthly and frail substance, and, unmindful of divine things, despising human things, deforms the very bearing and gait of the arrogant man. Such as Isaiah describes the daughters of Judah, flashing with the nods of their eyes and tossing themselves with high neck.
11:97
sunt enim huiusmodi erigentes supercilia, inflato corde, elato pectore, ceruice resupina, qui solum quidem pedum perstringant uestigiis, toto autem se librent. corpore at inani suspendant examine, in priora gressu prodeant in posteriora uerticem reclinantes, caelum spectent, terram autem fastidiant tamquam ceruicis dolore suffixi. ut eam inclinare non possint. hos igitur deleuit de libro uitae deus dicens: omnis qui se exaltat humiliabitur nec inter merita sanctorum commentis facit adhaerere caelestibus. omnibus igitur qui extra arcam fuerunt interemptis derelictus est solus Noe in arca cum iis qui cum ipso erant.
因為確有這樣的人,挑起眉毛,心高氣傲,挺胸昂首,頸項向後仰,雖只用腳掌的痕跡擦過地面,卻把全身平衡起來,懸於虛浮的姿態之上;他們向前邁步,卻把頭頂向後傾仰;他們仰望天,卻鄙視地,彷彿被頸項的疼痛所刺穿,以致不能彎下頸項。因此神把這些人從生命冊上除滅,說:「凡自高的,必降為卑」,並不容他們憑著對屬天之事的虛構,廁身於聖徒的功德之中。於是凡在方舟外的都被毀滅,唯獨挪亞和那些與他同在的人留在方舟中。
For there are such men, raising their eyebrows, with inflated heart, lifted chest, neck thrown back, who indeed graze the ground only with the traces of their feet, but balance their whole body, suspended on an empty poise; they advance forward in their step while reclining their crown backward; they gaze at heaven, but disdain the earth, as though pierced through with a pain of the neck, so that they cannot bend it. These, therefore, God blotted out of the book of life, saying: 'Everyone who exalts himself shall be humbled,' and does not let them cling among the merits of the saints by their fabrications to heavenly things. All those, therefore, who were outside the ark having been destroyed, Noah alone was left in the ark with those who were with him.
11:98
non indiget interpretatione sermo simplicior - concurrit intellectus cum littera —, altior autem et interior significatio demonstrat iustum uirum amatoremque sapientiae tamquam arborem fructuosam internecatis quae escam eius solebant adrodere, comam obumbrare, coaitare processus ramorum uelut exsortem inrationabilium passionum solum remansisse cum suis. sui autem sunt purae animi disceptationes, quae uirtuti adhaereant.
那較淺白的論述不需解釋——理解與字面同步——;但更高、更內在的意義則表明那義人、智慧的愛慕者,獨自與他自己的人一同存留,如同一棵結果子的樹,那時那些慣於啃食它的養分、遮蔽它的枝葉、扼制它枝條生長之物已被砍除,他彷彿是免於非理性情慾的人。而「他自己的人」乃是心靈純潔的思辨,緊緊依附於德行。
The simpler discourse does not need interpretation — the understanding runs together with the letter —; but the higher and inner signification shows the just man and lover of wisdom to have remained alone with his own, like a fruitful tree, when those things had been cut off which were wont to gnaw at its food, to overshadow its foliage, to choke the growth of its branches, as one exempt from irrational passions. But 'his own' are the pure deliberations of the spirit, which cling to virtue.
11:99
et bene addidit in arca remansisse, quasi uix credibile amputatis corporalibus passionibus uideretur eum adhuc uersari in corpore, quo, licet iam terrenis careret contagiis, incorruptam licet, corporis tamen adhuc substantiam reseruabat et uelut incorporeus in corpore superferebatur diluuio, non absorbebatur, corpus quidem gerens quasi in arcae positus interno, sed qui corpus ipsum insuperabilis passionibus quasi incorporeus in medio tantorum motuum gubernaret. Memor fuit dominus Noe et bestiarum et iumentorum, ut inquit scriptura diuina. mouentur plerique qua causa non dixerit scriptor quod etiam uxoris et filiorum Noe memor fuit deus, cum bestiarum fuerit et iumentorum memor.
他很妥當地補上說他留在方舟中,因為這似乎令人難以置信:身體的情慾既已被砍除,他卻仍住在身體裡;雖然他如今已脫離屬地的污染,卻仍保存著身體的本體(雖然這本體是不朽壞的),並彷彿無形體一般在身體裡被托於洪水之上,而不被吞沒——他確實如同被安置在方舟內部一般背負著身體,卻又如同無形體者在那麼大的動盪之中、不被情慾所勝地掌管著身體本身。正如神聖的經文所說:「主記念挪亞和走獸並牲畜。」許多人困惑於:作者為何沒有說神也記念挪亞的妻子和兒子,反倒記念走獸和牲畜。
And well did he add that he remained in the ark, since it would seem scarcely credible that, with the bodily passions cut off, he was still dwelling in the body; in which, though he was now free from earthly contaminations, he yet still preserved, incorrupt though it was, the substance of the body, and as it were incorporeal he was borne up above the flood in the body, and was not absorbed, bearing indeed the body as one placed in the interior of the ark, but governing the body itself, unconquerable by passions, as it were incorporeal in the midst of so great commotions. 'The Lord remembered Noah and the beasts and the cattle,' as divine Scripture says. Many are moved as to why the writer did not say that God remembered also the wife and sons of Noah, when He remembered the beasts and the cattle.
11:100
sed cum dixerit quod memor Noe fuerit, in auctore et praesule domus necessitudines eius reliquas conprehendit. simul exprimi uidetur quidam reliquarum consensus necessitudinum. etenim cum omnes inuicem sibi cari sunt, una est domus; cum autem discrepant, separantur et scinduntur in plures domos. ubi ergo caritas, ibi senioris nomine, de quo pendent ceteri, domus omnis significatur, ut si quis arborem dicat, utique conprehendit et ramos, si quis ramum nominet, etiam fructus qui in eo sunt pariter uno atque eodem sermone conplectitur.
但當他說神記念挪亞時,乃是在這家的創始者與家主身上,包含了他其餘的親屬。同時,其餘親屬之間某種的和睦也似乎被表達出來。因為,當眾人彼此相親時,這家便是一個整體;但當他們不和時,便分裂為數個家。所以哪裡有愛德,哪裡便以那眾人所倚靠的長者之名,表示了整個家;正如有人若說「樹」,他必然也包含了枝子;有人若說「枝子」,他也以同一個詞同時涵蓋了枝上的果子。
But when he said that He remembered Noah, in the author and head of the house he comprehended the rest of his kindred. At the same time a certain agreement of the remaining kindred seems to be expressed. For indeed, when all are mutually dear to one another, the house is one; but when they disagree, they are separated and split into several houses. Where therefore there is charity, there by the name of the elder, on whom the rest depend, the whole house is signified; just as, if anyone says 'tree,' he certainly comprehends also the branches; if anyone names a 'branch,' he likewise embraces in one and the same word also the fruits that are on it.
11:101
nec illud otiosum quod primo dixit quia memor fuit deus Noe, deinde bestiarum, postea iumentorum, hoc est cur non ea animantia quae mitiora sunt post hominem nominauit, sed ferociora. in quo uidetur illa esse ratio, ut ea quae ferociora erant utriusque partis uicinitate mansuescerent. quod uidetur etiam in illo uersu poetico declarari : κακὸς δ\' εἰς μέσσον ἔλασσεν . hinc enim etiam poeta usurpauit, ut dispositionem dimicaturi ita ordinaret exercitus, quo inferiores in medio conlocaret, quo magis hinc inde a fortioribus iuuarentur et dimicationem utriusque partis adsumerent. in his scripti series manifestatur.
他先說神記念挪亞,然後是走獸,其後是牲畜,這也並非無意義——就是說,他為何沒有在人之後先提那些較溫順的活物,反倒先提那些較兇猛的。其中的緣由似乎是這樣:那些較兇猛的,可以藉著兩方的鄰近而被馴服。這似乎在那句詩中也得到了申明:「他把懦弱者趕到中間。」因為詩人也由此借用了這做法,把將要作戰之軍隊的部署這樣安排:把較弱者置於中間,好叫他們在兩側更得到較強者的援助,並承擔兩方的爭戰。在這些事上,經文的次序顯明出來。
Nor is it idle that he first said that God remembered Noah, then the beasts, afterward the cattle — that is, why he did not name after man those living creatures that are gentler, but the fiercer ones. In which the reason seems to be this, that those which were fiercer might be tamed by the nearness of either party. Which seems to be declared also in that poetic verse: 'and he drove the coward into the middle.' For hence the poet too borrowed the practice, so to arrange the disposition of an army about to fight that he would place the weaker in the middle, that they might be the more aided on either side by the stronger and take up the contest of both parties. In these things the sequence of the writing is made manifest.
11:102
altiore autem sensu certum est quod iustus in medio habet, non in parte cogitationes cordis sui et, quoad carpit hanc uitam, habeat necesse est in corpore tamquam in illa arca bestias graues. nulla enim mens est, nulla anima, quae non recipiat etiam malarum motus agrestes cogitationum. itaque insipientis anima ferinos acuit motus atque adolet uenena serpentum, sapientis autem uigor mitigat et coercet. et induxit dominus spiritum super terram, et cessauit aqua. non puto ita hoc dictum, ut spiritus nomine uentum accipiamus. neque enim uentus poterat siccare diluuium: alioqui cum mare cotidie uentis exagitetur, exinaniretur profecto.
但就更高層的意義而言,可以確定的是:義人把他心中的思念持守在中間,而非在一邊,並且只要他摘取此生,就必然在身體裡——彷彿在那方舟裡——容納著那些兇猛的野獸。因為沒有一個心思、沒有一個靈魂不也接受邪惡思念的狂野衝動。於是愚妄人的靈魂磨利那獸性的衝動,滋養蛇的毒;而智慧人的活力卻緩和並約束它們。「主使一陣風颳過地面,水就退了。」我不認為這話是要我們以「風」之名理解一陣微風。因為風不能使洪水乾涸:否則,既然海每日被風攪動,它必早已被掏空。
But in the higher sense it is certain that the just man holds the thoughts of his heart in the middle, not in a part, and, as long as he plucks at this life, must of necessity hold in the body, as it were in that ark, the grievous beasts. For there is no mind, no soul, which does not also receive the wild motions of evil thoughts. And so the soul of the foolish man whets the bestial motions and fosters the poisons of serpents, but the vigour of the wise man mitigates and restrains them. 'And the Lord brought a wind upon the earth, and the water ceased.' I do not think this was said so that by the name of 'wind' we should understand a breeze. For a wind could not dry up the flood: otherwise, since the sea is daily agitated by winds, it would surely be emptied out.
11:103
nam quomodo non euacuaretur mare uentorum ui, cui cessisset toto diffusum orbe diluuium usque ad Herculis ut aiunt columnas et mare magnum tectis montium excelsorum uerticibus exaestuans? spiritus igitur diuini uirtute inuisibili diluuium illud repressum esse non dubium est, caelesti operatione, non flatu. unde scriptum est: omnia. a te expectant ut des illis cibum in tempore. aperiente te manum tuam uniuersa implebuntur bonitate, au e r ten tea aute m te faciem turbabuntur. auferes spiritum eorum, et deficient et in puluerem suum conuertentur. emittes spiritum tuum, et creabuntur, et renouabis faciem terrae.
因為海怎能不被風的力量掏空呢?倘若洪水真要屈服於風,它已遍佈整個地球,據說甚至直到海格力斯的柱子,那大海高漲,連高山的頂峰都被淹沒。因此毫無疑問,那洪水乃是被神聖之靈那不可見的能力所抑制,是藉天上的運行,而非藉一陣風。因此經上記著:「萬物都仰望你,等你按時給牠們食物。你張手,牠們便飽得美物;你掩面,牠們便驚惶。你收回牠們的氣,牠們就死亡歸於塵土。你發出你的靈,牠們便受造,你也使地面更換為新。」
For how would the sea not be emptied by the force of the winds, to which the flood would have yielded — spread over the whole globe even to the pillars of Hercules, as they say, and the great sea seething with the peaks of the high mountains covered? It is therefore not doubtful that that flood was repressed by the invisible power of the divine Spirit, by a heavenly operation, not by a blast. Whence it is written: 'All things wait upon thee, that thou mayest give them food in due season. When thou openest thy hand, all things shall be filled with goodness; but when thou turnest away thy face, they shall be troubled. Thou shalt take away their spirit, and they shall fail and be turned into their dust. Thou shalt send forth thy spirit, and they shall be created, and thou shalt renew the face of the earth.'
11:104
est ergo spiritus, cuius operationi cedere uniuersa uideantur, in quo caeli ipsius uirtus sit, sicut scriptum est: uerbo domini caeli firmati sunt et spiritu oris eius omnis uirtus eorum. qui spiritus est creator uniuersorum, sicut etiam Iob dicit: spiritus diuinus qui fecit me. Nunc consideremus quid sit quod ait scriptura: clausi sunt fontes aquarum et cataractae caeli. nec obscurum arbitror. his enim causis minuitur diluuium, quibus creuit. erupti erant fontes aquarum, apertae fuerant cataractae caeli, ut undique influentibus aquis terra inundaretur. debuerant claudi ea ex quibus diluui origo manauit, ut eius inciperet esse defectus.
因此有一位聖靈,萬物似乎都向祂的運行屈服,天上的能力本身也在祂裡面,正如經上記著:「諸天藉耶和華的話而立,萬象藉祂口中的氣而成。」這位聖靈乃是萬物的創造者,正如約伯也說:「那造我的神聖之靈。」如今讓我們思想經文所說的:「水的泉源和天上的閘門都被關閉了。」我也不認為這是晦澀的。因為洪水正是藉著它增長所憑的那些緣由而消減。水的泉源曾裂開,天上的閘門曾敞開,好叫水從四面湧入,使地被淹沒。那些洪水起源所從出之物必須被關閉,好叫它的消退得以開始。
There is therefore a Spirit, to whose operation all things seem to yield, in whom is the very power of heaven, as it is written: 'By the word of the Lord the heavens were established, and by the spirit of his mouth all their power.' Which Spirit is the creator of all things, as Job too says: 'The divine Spirit who made me.' Now let us consider what it is that Scripture says: 'The fountains of waters were shut and the cataracts of heaven.' Nor do I think it obscure. For by these causes the flood is diminished, by which it grew. The fountains of waters had been broken up, the cataracts of heaven had been opened, that with the waters flowing in from every side the earth might be inundated. Those things had to be shut from which the origin of the flood flowed, that its abatement might begin.
11:105
hoc littera sonat, subtilior autem interpretatio exprimit eo quod diluuium animae uitio mentis et luxuriae corporalis influxerat, ut malitia passioni, passio malitiae misceretur. ingrediente medico dei uerbo ad uisitationem animae, quae diutina aegritudine laborabat disceptationum inprobitate et passionum acerbitate, prius causae debuerunt aegritudinis amputari. principium enim medicinae est causas languoris incidere, ne diutius ea quae nocent ad incrementum aegritudinis ministrentur. quod nos etiam lex docet. cum enim steterit lepra, ut iam non diffundatur, tunc ait mundam esse leprae stationem quandam et mansionem; quidquid enim praeter naturam mouetur immundum est.
字面如此說;但更精微的解釋則表達了這點:洪水乃是藉著靈魂在心思上的惡與身體的奢華而湧入,以致惡毒與情慾相混、情慾與惡毒相混。當那位醫生——神的道——進來探望這靈魂時(它正因辯論的邪惡與情慾的酷烈而患著長久的疾病),疾病的緣由必須先被切除。因為醫治的起頭乃是切入衰弱的緣由,免得那些有害之物更久地被供應,以致疾病加增。這也是律法所教導我們的。因為當麻瘋停住、不再蔓延時,律法便說這麻瘋的停留與存留之處為潔淨;因為凡違反本性而動的,都是不潔淨的。
This the letter sounds; but the subtler interpretation expresses this, that the flood had flowed in by the soul's vice of the mind and of bodily luxury, so that malice was mingled with passion, and passion with malice. When the physician, the Word of God, enters for the visitation of the soul, which was labouring with a long-standing sickness through the wickedness of disputations and the bitterness of passions, the causes of the sickness had first to be cut off. For the beginning of medicine is to cut into the causes of languor, lest those things which harm should longer be ministered to the increase of the sickness. This the Law too teaches us. For when the leprosy has stood still, so that it no longer spreads, then it says that the standing-place and abode of the leprosy is clean; for whatever is moved contrary to nature is unclean.
11:106
haec igitur est animae sanitas, haec salubritas mentis, ut affluentia cesset errois, sistatur culpa, ne serpat. cessante incentiuo culpae atque delicti salus tuta est atque inoffensus uigor animae se refundit. Et sedit arca inquit septimo mense septima et uicensima mensis. nisi diligenter intendas, etiam secundum litteram difficilis loci istius conprehensio est. et primum omnium cauendum, ne quem septimi mensis repetitio crebra perturbet. sic enim scriptum est, sescentesimo anno septimo mense septima et uicensima mensis coepisse diluuium, centum. quinquaginta diebus fuisse infusionem aquarum, sedisse arcam in monte septimo mense septima et uicensima mensis:
因此這就是靈魂的健康、心思的康健:使過錯的氾濫止息,使罪責被攔阻,免得它蔓延滋長。當犯罪過犯的誘因止息時,救恩便穩妥,靈魂未受損的活力也重新傾注回來。經上說:「方舟在七月二十七日停住了。」你若不仔細留意,這段經文即使按字面也難以領會。而首先必須提防,免得七月的屢次重複攪擾任何人。因為經上是這樣寫的:在六百歲那年七月二十七日洪水開始;水傾注了一百五十天;方舟在七月二十七日停在山上:
This therefore is the health of the soul, this the soundness of the mind, that the overflow of error should cease, that guilt should be stopped, lest it creep onward. When the incitement to guilt and transgression has ceased, salvation is secure, and the unimpaired vigour of the soul pours itself back. 'And the ark rested,' it says, 'in the seventh month, on the twenty-seventh of the month.' Unless you attend carefully, even according to the letter the comprehension of this passage is difficult. And first of all it must be guarded against, lest the frequent repetition of the seventh month perturb anyone. For thus it is written: in the six-hundredth year, in the seventh month, on the twenty-seventh of the month the flood began; for a hundred and fifty days there was a pouring-in of the waters; the ark rested on the mountain in the seventh month, on the twenty-seventh of the month:
11:107
postea minui coepisse aquas misericordia dei, centum quinquaginta diebus deminutionem aquarum factam, postea apparuisse capita montium: deinde post quadraginta dies aperuisse ostium arcae sanctum Noe, dimissum coruum non reuertisse, dimissam columbam reuertisse uacuam, iterum post septem dies dimissam reuertisse cum ramo oliuae, tertio post septem dies dimissam non reuertisse, tunc aduertisse Noe quod aqua omnis recessisset. ac sic annus conclusus ostenditur septimo mense septima et uicensima mensis [ac sic annus conclusus ostenditur sescentesimo primo anno Noe in secundo mense septima et uicensima mensis].
其後藉著神的憐憫,水開始消退;在一百五十天內水的消減完成了;其後山頂顯露出來;然後過了四十天,聖潔的挪亞打開了方舟的門;放出去的烏鴉沒有回來;放出去的鴿子空著回來;過了七天再放出去的鴿子,銜著橄欖枝回來;第三次過七天放出去的鴿子,就不再回來了;那時挪亞察覺到水都退了。如此這一年便顯為在七月二十七日結束〔如此這一年便顯為在挪亞六百零一歲的二月二十七日結束〕。
afterward by the mercy of God the waters began to diminish; in a hundred and fifty days the diminution of the waters was effected; afterward the tops of the mountains appeared; then after forty days holy Noah opened the door of the ark; the raven that was sent out did not return; the dove that was sent out returned empty; again after seven days the dove that was sent out returned with an olive branch; the third time, after seven days, the dove that was sent out did not return; then Noah perceived that all the water had receded. And thus the year is shown to be concluded in the seventh month, on the twenty-seventh of the month [and thus the year is shown to be concluded in the six-hundred-and-first year of Noah, in the second month, on the twenty-seventh of the month].
11:108
quod igitur ad explanationem apertam pertinet, eodem mense atque eodem die restituitur aequalitas terrae post diluuium. quo corrupta est incipiente infusione diluuii. ueris enim tempore omnis ager uiret et terra parturit fructus. tunc incipiunt gemmare arbores, germinare fructus. diuitem ergo reformauit dominus et restituit. qualitatem. mense igitur secundo, hoc est, apriliprimus enim mensis martius est, quo habet iustus natalem, quando noctium dierumque aequalitas aestimatur hoc est octauo ut Romani putant uel ut alii quinto kalendas apriles —, mense inquam secundo, hoc est aprili, septima et uicensima mensis, coepit diluuium. uer igitur initium anni aestimatur, non secundum.
至於關乎明白的解釋:在同一個月、同一日,洪水之後地的平整狀態得以恢復——它正是在洪水的淹沒開始時被敗壞的。因為在春季,每片田地都青翠,地也產育出果子。那時樹木開始發芽,果子開始萌生。因此主重整並恢復了那豐饒的品質。所以是在第二個月,即四月——因為第一個月是三月,義人正在這月出生,那時晝夜相等被估算為(按羅馬人所認為的)四月朔日前第八日,或(按別人所言)朔日前第五日——我說,是在第二個月即四月二十七日,洪水開始了。因此春天被算為一年的起頭,而非第二〔個季節〕。
As for what pertains to the open explanation, in the same month and on the same day the level state of the earth is restored after the flood, by which it was corrupted when the inundation of the flood began. For in the spring season every field is green and the earth labours forth its fruits. Then the trees begin to bud, the fruits to germinate. Therefore the Lord reformed and restored the rich quality. In the second month, therefore, that is, in April — for the first month is March, in which the just man has his birth, when the equality of nights and days is reckoned, that is, on the eighth, as the Romans suppose, or, as others, on the fifth before the Kalends of April — in the second month, I say, that is, in April, on the twenty-seventh of the month, the flood began. Spring therefore is reckoned the beginning of the year, not the second.
11:109
usum temporis, sed secundum naturae praerogatiuam, ut quia tunc spes anni incohat et incipit se fructus ostendere, tunc uideatur anni esse principium. septimus autem mensis secundum numerum is qui september dicitur computatur, quia etsi a septembri mense annus uideatur incipere, sicut indictionum praesentium usus ostendittunc enim seminum iactus —, uere tamen, ex quo plenior gratia se incipit demonstrare, ex eo anni origo subducitur et ideo qui alia ratione primus putatur diuersa aestimatione septimus habetur. tunc ergo sedit arca, hoc est in mense septimo septima et uicensima mensis super montem fquarati. ex illo minui diluuium coepit.
……不是按季節的習用,而是按本性的優先權,以致因為那時一年的盼望開始、果子開始顯現,那時便當被視為一年的起頭。但按計算,第七個月就是那稱為九月的;因為儘管一年似乎從九月開始(正如當前各「稅期年」的習用所顯示——因為那時是撒種),然而從春天——較豐盛的恩典從那時開始顯現——一年的起源乃是從那裡推算的;因此那按另一種算法被認為是第一個的月份,按不同的估算卻被視為第七個月。所以那時方舟停住了,即在七月二十七日,停在亞拉臘山上。從那時起洪水開始消減。
...not according to the usage of the season, but according to the prerogative of nature, so that, because then the hope of the year begins and the fruit begins to show itself, then it should seem to be the beginning of the year. But the seventh month, according to the count, is that which is called September; for although the year may seem to begin from the month of September, as the usage of the present indictions shows — for then is the casting of seeds —, yet from spring, from which fuller grace begins to show itself, from that the origin of the year is derived; and therefore that which by another reckoning is thought to be the first, by a different estimation is held to be the seventh. Then therefore the ark rested, that is, in the seventh month, on the twenty-seventh of the month, upon the mountain of Ararat. From that the flood began to diminish.
11:110
simul considera quia isdem numeris quibus aliqua incipiunt resoluuntur, ut diluuium coepit secundo mense anni septima et uicensima mensis, centum quinquaginta diebus influxit diluuium, centum quinquaginta diebus aliis cessit diluuium, quadraginta diebus nimia uis caelesti imbre et fontium eruptione exaestuauit, quadraginta diebus aliis exactis, postquam uisa sunt capita montium, undecimo mense prima die mensis dimisit coruum sanctus Noe. ita constat eodem numero quo cumulatum est diluuium esse inminutum. unde docet nos scriptura ordinem esse seruandum. Quod autem ostium arcae sit, quod aperuit iustus, secundum corporis rationem supra dictum est.
同時要思想:萬事是藉著它們開始所憑的同一數目而消解的:洪水在那年的二月二十七日開始;洪水傾注了一百五十天;又消退了另一個一百五十天;那過度的威力以天上的雨和泉源的迸裂沸騰了四十天;又過了另外四十天,山頂顯露之後,在十一月初一日,聖潔的挪亞放出了烏鴉。如此可知,洪水是藉著它堆積起來所憑的同一數目而消減的。因此經文教導我們,當保持次序。但義人所開的方舟之門是什麼,已在上文按身體的道理說過了。
At the same time consider that by the same numbers by which some things begin they are dissolved: as the flood began in the second month of the year, on the twenty-seventh of the month; for a hundred and fifty days the flood flowed in; for another hundred and fifty days the flood subsided; for forty days the excessive force seethed with heavenly rain and the bursting of the fountains; and when another forty days had elapsed, after the tops of the mountains were seen, in the eleventh month, on the first day of the month, holy Noah sent out the raven. Thus it is established that by the same number by which the flood was heaped up it was diminished. Whence Scripture teaches us that order is to be preserved. But what the door of the ark is, which the just man opened, has been said above according to the reasoning of the body.
11:111
secundum altiorem autem interpretationem illud dicendum uidetur, quia corporis sensus uelut ostiorum similes habentur. per hos enim tamquam per ostia ingreditur in nostram mentem uelut quaedam sensibilium conprehensio. ergo mens nostra per hos sensus respicere uidetur et maxime per uisionem, quae omnibus sensibus corporis praestabilior aestimatur, quia domestica est luminis et per eam aspicientes caelum terram maria, solem quoque, lunam et stellas quibus axis ornatur intellegimus deum esse operatorem mundi atque rectorem nec sine auctore deo tantorumque operum conditore haec potuisse fieri credimus aut posse consistere. per hanc igitur fenestram coruum primum iustus emisit.
然而按照更深的解釋,應當這樣說:身體的諸感官被視為彷彿門戶。因為透過這些感官,如同透過門戶一般,可感事物的某種領會便進入我們的心智。所以我們的心智似乎是藉著這些感官向外觀看,尤其是藉著視覺——它被判定為比身體一切感官更為卓越,因為它與光相親。我們藉著視覺仰望天、地、海,也仰望日、月,並仰望那點綴穹蒼的眾星,便明白神是世界的創造者與治理者;我們也相信,若沒有神作為起源、作為如此偉大工作的締造者,這一切既不能成就,也不能存續。於是義人最先就是透過這扇窗戶放出了烏鴉。
According to the deeper interpretation, however, this must be said: that the senses of the body are reckoned as being like doors. For through these, as through doors, there enters into our mind, as it were, a certain apprehension of sensible things. Our mind, therefore, seems to look out through these senses, and especially through sight, which is judged to be more excellent than all the senses of the body, because it is akin to light; and gazing through it upon the heaven, the earth, the seas, the sun also, the moon and the stars with which the firmament is adorned, we understand that God is the Maker and Governor of the world, and we believe that without God as author and as founder of works so great these things could neither have come to be nor be able to subsist. Through this window, then, the just man first sent forth the raven.
11:112
quaerenda causa nec tamen latet quantum ad litteram pertinet, quia plerique quasi adnuntium futurorum coruum aestimant et uoces eius obseruant uolatusque rimantur. sensus autem altior significat quod mens iusti, quando mundare se incipit, quae tenebrosa et inmunda et temeraria sunt primo a se repellit, siquidem omnis inpudentia atque culpa tenebrosa est et mortuis pascitur sicut coruus, lumini autem uicina uirtus, quae mentis puritate et simplicitate resplendet. et ideo tamquam emittitur et fugatur culpa et separatur ab innocentia, ut nihil remaneat in uiri iusti mente tenebrosum.
其緣由須加探尋,然而就字面而言並不隱晦;因為很多人把烏鴉當作未來之事的某種報信者,觀察牠的叫聲,並細究牠的飛行。但更深的意義所表明的是:義人的心智在開始潔淨自己時,首先把那些黑暗、不潔、肆意妄為的事從自身驅逐——因為一切無恥與過犯都是黑暗的,並如烏鴉一般以死物為食——反之,德行則近於光,它藉著心智的純潔與單純而發光。因此過犯彷彿被放出、被驅趕,並與純真分離,使義人的心智裡不再留有任何黑暗之物。
The reason must be sought, and yet, as far as the letter is concerned, it is not hidden; for very many people regard the raven as a kind of herald of things to come, and they observe its cries and scrutinize its flights. But the deeper sense signifies that the mind of the just man, when it begins to purify itself, first drives away from itself the things that are dark and unclean and reckless—since all shamelessness and fault is dark, and feeds upon dead things like the raven—whereas virtue is near to the light, which shines forth by the purity and simplicity of the mind. And therefore fault is, as it were, sent out and put to flight and separated from innocence, so that nothing dark may remain in the mind of the just man.
11:113
denique egressus coruus non reuertitur ad iustum, quia fugitans omnis culpa est aequitatis nec probitati uidetur et iustitiae conuenire. denique euasisse se credit iniustus tamquam de uinculis, cum iustus ab eius se consortio separauerit, diluuii cuiusdam et corruptelae familiaris, ut coruus, qui, cum siccitatem terrae nusquam inuenerit, non reuersus est, sed remansit. considerandum etiam quare non regressum dixerit coruum, donec siccaret aqua a terra, quasi uero postea sit regressus. sed elocutio familiaris scripturae est diuinae, siquidem et in euangelio habes scriptum de sancta Maria quod non cognouerit eam Ioseph, donec peperit filium, cum utique nec postea cognouerit.
末了,烏鴉一旦出去,便不返回義人那裡,因為一切過犯都是公義的逃亡者,也似乎不適合與正直和公正相合。其實不義之人以為自己彷彿脫離了捆鎖而得逃脫,因為義人已從他的交往中分離出來——從那彷彿洪水與相熟的敗壞中分離——正如那烏鴉:牠既無處尋得地上的乾處,便不返回,反倒滯留在外。也應思想:經上為何說烏鴉沒有返回,「直到」水從地上乾了,彷彿日後牠就返回了。但這是神聖經卷所慣用的說法;因為在福音書中你也讀到關於聖瑪利亞的記載,說約瑟沒有與她同房,「直到」她生了兒子——其實此後他也始終沒有與她同房。
Finally, the raven once gone forth does not return to the just man, because all fault is a fugitive from equity, nor does it seem to befit uprightness and justice. Indeed the unjust man believes he has escaped as if from bonds, when the just man has separated himself from his fellowship—from a kind of flood and from a familiar corruption—like the raven, which, when it nowhere found the dryness of the earth, did not return but remained. It must also be considered why Scripture did not say that the raven returned until the water dried from the earth, as though it returned afterward. But this is a manner of speech familiar to divine Scripture; for in the Gospel too you have it written of holy Mary that Joseph did not know her until she had borne her son—though assuredly he did not know her afterward either.
11:114
deinde quae est locutio ista, ut diceret donec siccaret aqua a terra, non terra ab aqua? et quidem usus loquendi etiam hoc habere consueuit. tamen nonnulli ante nos aestimauerunt, eo quod immoderata quaedam uideatur uis exprimi passionum hac elocutione uerborum, quia turbidis passionibus ac procellosis consumatur anima, deficientibus autem et uelut arescentibus uirtutem resumat. non redit igitur culpae species in animam iusti quasi siccam et mortuam derelinquens et cui iam nocere non possit. Nec illud uacuum, quod postea columba dimittitur; malitiam etenim simplicitas et culpam uirtus resoluit.
其次,這是怎樣的一種說法,竟說「直到水從地上乾了」,而不說「地從水中乾了」?確實,言語的慣用法也常有這種說法。然而我們之前的某些作者卻判斷說:由於這種措辭似乎表達出情慾某種無節制的力量,靈魂便為翻騰暴烈的情慾所吞噬,但當這些情慾衰退、彷彿乾涸之時,靈魂便重得其德行。所以過犯的形貌不再返回義人的靈魂,而是將靈魂留在彷彿乾燥而死寂的狀態,並使它再也無法加害於人。那後來放出鴿子之事也並非毫無意義;因為單純消解惡毒,德行消解過犯。
Next, what manner of expression is this, that Scripture should say 'until the water dried from the earth,' and not 'the earth from the water'? And indeed the usage of speech has been wont to have this also. Yet certain authors before us judged that, because a kind of immoderate force of the passions seems to be expressed by this turn of words, the soul is consumed by turbid and stormy passions, but, when they fail and as it were dry up, it resumes its virtue. The appearance of fault, therefore, does not return into the soul of the just man, leaving it as it were dry and dead, and one to which it can no longer do harm. Nor is that without meaning, that afterward the dove is sent out; for simplicity dissolves malice, and virtue dissolves fault.
11:115
malitia igitur amat diluuium, consortium iustae mentis refugit et quasi desolata et sine aliqua statione remanet nullam habens cum uirtute communionem, uirtus autem redit amans iustorum consortia et largiendae familiarior utilitati, quae conferat salutaria et cauenda ea quae sunt nocitura commoneat, sicut columba dimissa cum uideret cessasse aquam, regressa est tamquam plena iustitiae, ut ei a quo missa fuerat nuntiaret quid adhuc cauere deberet atque spectando fructu postea meliore potiretur.
所以惡毒喜愛洪水,卻躲避義心的相交,並彷彿淒涼孤獨、毫無棲所地滯留,與德行毫無相通;反之,德行卻返回,愛慕義人的同伴,並與那要慷慨施予的益處更為親密——德行帶來有益之物,並警戒人提防那些將要為害的事——正如那放出的鴿子,看見水已退去,便滿懷公義地返回,向那放牠出去的人報告:他還當提防什麼,於是日後藉著守望可以得享更美的果子。
Malice, therefore, loves the flood, but shuns the fellowship of the just mind, and remains as it were desolate and without any resting place, having no communion with virtue; whereas virtue returns, loving the company of the just, and being the more intimate with usefulness that is to be freely bestowed—virtue which brings what is salutary and warns against the things that will be harmful—just as the dove, when sent out, on seeing that the water had ceased, returned full of justice, to report to him by whom it had been sent what he ought still to beware of, and so afterward, by watching, might enjoy a better fruit.
11:116
quod autem columba non inueniens requiem suam regreditur ad eum, manifestum indicium dedit per huiusmodi aues quantum intersit inter malitiam et uirtutem exprimi, siquidem cornus ante dimissus, cum aliquanto uideretur amplius exundare diluuium, uisus est locum inuenisse residendi. et certe non est huiusmodi coruus ut aliae aues, quae in aquis conuersationem habere consuerunt.
但鴿子既為自己尋不著安息之處,便返回到那人那裡,這就藉著這類飛鳥給出了明白的記號,顯明在惡毒與德行之間當表明何等大的差異;因為那較早放出的烏鴉,當洪水似乎還稍微泛濫之時,卻被看見已尋得棲止之所。而烏鴉確實不像其他飛鳥那樣,慣於在水上棲居。
But the fact that the dove, finding no rest for itself, returns to him, gave a clear sign through birds of this kind, how great a difference there is to be expressed between malice and virtue; since the raven, sent out earlier, when the flood seemed still to be somewhat overflowing, was seen to have found a place to settle. And surely the raven is not of such a kind as the other birds, which are accustomed to have their dwelling upon the waters.
11:117
cum ergo cornus ubi remaneret inuenisse uideatur, columba autem non inuenerit, euidens ratio est altiore interpretatione signari quia malitia inquietis passionibus et cupiditatibus, quibus corrumpitur anima, se miscere consueuit et quasi cognatis et domesticis delectatur ibique commorationem suam locat, uirtus autem prima statim specie uisionis offensa regredi festinauit ad mentem animamque iusti, quod illic diuersorium sibi tutissimum sit locatum, eo quod alibi tamquam columba ita huiusmodi uirtus stationem tutissimam inuenire non possit. tarde enim inter astutias istius mundi et saecularium fluctus cupiditatum portum solet inuenire simplicitas.
那麼,既然烏鴉似乎尋得了可以滯留之處,鴿子卻尋不著,明白的道理便是:按更深的解釋,這乃表明惡毒慣於與那些敗壞靈魂的不安情慾和貪慾相混雜,並彷彿與相親相熟之物為樂,且在那裡安置自己的居所;反之,德行卻一見其所目睹之物的形貌就受了冒犯,急忙返回到義人的心智與靈魂,因為在那裡為它設立了一個最安穩的居所,因為在別處,這樣的德行如同鴿子一般,無法尋得最安穩的棲止之所。因為在這世界的詭詐與世俗貪慾的洶湧波濤之間,單純難得尋著港灣。
Since, then, the raven seemed to have found where it might remain, but the dove did not find it, the clear reasoning is that by the deeper interpretation it is signified that malice is wont to mingle itself with the restless passions and desires by which the soul is corrupted, and to take delight as though in things kindred and familiar, and there to establish its lodging; whereas virtue, offended at the very first appearance of what it sees, hastened to return to the mind and soul of the just man, because there a most safe lodging had been set up for it, since elsewhere such virtue, like the dove, cannot find a most safe resting place. For amid the cunning of this world and the surging of worldly desires, simplicity is slow to find a harbor.
11:118
itaque sicut uirtns uelut uisendi gratia progressa paulisper ad mentem optimam redire festinat nec longius discedit a iusto, ita etiam iustus et studiosus uirtutis, ubi uirtutem adpropinquare cognouerit, gremium suae mentis expandit. quid enim sibi uult quod uiri studiosus uirtutis Noe extendens manum suscepit eam et introduxit ad se? quod etsi secundum litteram planum uidetur, non facile tamen colligas, nisi uiri sapientis tibi nota sit consuetudo, qui uelut speculatrice uirtute utitur et ei explorandorum negotiorum gerendorumque praerogatiuam quandam uidetur committere. ea ergo uirtus expendit naturas, ut si qua earum sibi uidetur adcommoda, profectum ei possit adiungere.
因此,正如德行彷彿為著探望而出去,過了片刻便急忙返回那至善的心智,並不遠離義人,照樣,義人和熱心追求德行的人,當他認出德行正在臨近時,便敞開他心智的胸懷。因為挪亞這位熱心追求德行的人,伸手接住鴿子並把牠帶進自己那裡,這是什麼意思呢?縱然按字面而言似乎明白,然而你也不容易領會其意,除非你曉得智者的習慣:他彷彿把德行當作探子來使用,並似乎把考察與經辦事務的某種優先權交託給它。所以那德行衡量各種本性,使得若有哪一種本性顯得適合於它,它便能把長進加在那本性上。
And so, just as virtue, having gone forth as it were for the sake of a visit, hastens after a little while to return to the best mind, and does not depart far from the just man, so also the just man and the zealot for virtue, when he has recognized that virtue is drawing near, opens wide the bosom of his mind. For what does it mean that Noah, a zealot for virtue, stretching out his hand, took the dove and brought it in to himself? Even though according to the letter this seems plain, yet you would not easily gather its meaning unless you knew the custom of the wise man, who employs virtue as it were as a scout, and seems to commit to it a certain prerogative of exploring the matters to be examined and managed. That virtue, therefore, weighs natures, so that if any of them seems suited to it, it can join its advancement to it.
11:119
communis enim quaedam est bonitas sapientiae et liberalis et larga utilitatis, ita ut quas morigeras sibi cernit adsociet. ubi autem proposito suo uiderit aliquorum recalcitrare naturam, uelut ad hospitium familiare sibi reuolat et recurrit, quam sapiens et industrius tamquam manu quadam mentis festinat excipere, omne cor aperiens suum, quo eam etiam absentem tenebat; numquam enim potest sapiens exors propriae esse uirtutis. Quid praeterea sibi uelit quod tenuit septem diebus aliis columbam et iterum dimisit eam, nisi ut aduertas quod bonum sapientis optimumque propositum semper sibi etiam alios adiungere studet, errantes emendare, corrigere uagantes?
因為智慧有某種共通的良善,既慷慨又豐厚地施益,以致它把那些它察覺對自己順服的本性聯合於自身。但當它看見某些人的本性抗拒它的旨意時,它便彷彿向那熟識的居所飛回、奔回,而智慧又勤勉的人急忙彷彿以心智的某隻手來接納它,敞開他的全心——他即使在它不在之時也以全心持守它;因為智者永不能被剝奪他自己固有的德行。再者,他把鴿子又多留了七日,然後再次放出去,這是什麼意思呢?無非是要你領悟:智者那良善至善的旨意,始終竭力把別人也聯合於自身,矯正那些迷誤的,導正那些飄蕩的。
For there is a certain common goodness of wisdom, both generous and lavish in usefulness, so that those natures which it perceives to be compliant to itself it associates with itself. But where it sees the nature of some persons to kick back against its purpose, it flies back and runs back as it were to a familiar lodging, which the wise and diligent man hastens to receive as though with a certain hand of the mind, opening his whole heart, by which he held it even when it was absent; for the wise man can never be deprived of his own proper virtue. Furthermore, what does it mean that he kept the dove seven other days and again sent it out, except that you should perceive that the good and best purpose of the wise man always strives to join others also to itself, to amend those who err, to correct those who wander?
11:120
si quem in principio resilire conspexerit, tamen commutandi eius et corrigendi non desperat profectum. sicut enim- bonus medicus, etsi tempus medicinae non sit, tamen uisitationis speculam ante praemittit, deinde non neglegit iustae expectationis excubias et paulisper passionibus cedens operitur facultatem medendi, quae ubi fuerit oblata, suum non intermittit officium: ita ergo et sapiens uerbis ac disputationibus tamquam medicus medicamentis contrarias curare desiderat passiones.
他若看見有人在起初退縮,仍然不對改變和矯正他這人之益處感到絕望。因為正如良醫,即使尚未到下藥之時,仍先派去探視的警覺目光,繼而不忽略那合宜等候的守望,並暫且順著病情而等待醫治的時機;那時機一旦來臨,他便不肯讓它白白過去而不盡其職分:智者也照樣,藉著言語與論述,如同醫生用藥一般,渴望醫治那些相反的情慾。
If he observes someone shrinking back at the beginning, nevertheless he does not despair of the profit of changing and correcting him. For just as the good physician, even if it is not yet the time for the remedy, nonetheless first sends ahead a watchful eye of visitation, then does not neglect the vigils of a just expectation, and yielding for a little to the passions awaits the opportunity of healing, which, when it has been offered, he does not let pass without performing his office: so therefore the wise man too, by words and discourses, like a physician with his medicines, desires to cure the contrary passions.
11:121
et quia in omnibus remedio diuini fauoris utendum est, ideo septem expectauit dies, quibus mundus omnis de scribitur absolutus et operatori requies ministrata, ut ex illo auctore omnium sumeretur disciplina operationis humanae. Regressa est igitur columba ad uesperam habens folium oleae et ramum in ore suo. non otiose et uesperam posuit et regressam et habentem folium oleae et ramulum in ore suo, ut non fugitantem uirtutem arbitreris profectus futuri, si quos possit adquirere, neque rursus tamquam sine lumine eam fuisse cognoscas et quibusdam tenebris occultam, sed diurno candore fulgentem expectasse usque ad occasum diei ac sic ad eum regressam.
又因為凡事都當運用神恩眷顧的良藥,所以他等候了七日——經上記載世界在這七日內被造成完備,並為它的創造者預備了安息——好叫人能從那萬有的締造者那裡汲取人類行事的準則。於是那鴿子在傍晚返回,口中銜著橄欖葉和一根枝子。經上並非無端地記下「傍晚」、記下牠的返回、記下牠口中銜著橄欖葉和一小枝——這是要你不以為德行是在逃避將來的益處(倘若它能贏得任何靈魂);也不要你以為它曾沒有光、隱沒在某種黑暗中,反倒要你知道:它閃耀著白晝的光輝,等候到日落,於是這樣返回到他那裡。
And because in all things one must make use of the remedy of divine favor, therefore he waited seven days, in which the whole world is described as having been completed and rest provided for its Maker, so that from that Author of all things might be drawn a discipline for human activity. The dove, then, returned at evening, having a leaf of the olive and a branch in its mouth. Not idly did Scripture set down both the evening and its returning and its having a leaf of the olive and a little branch in its mouth—so that you should not think that virtue is fleeing from the profit to come, if it might gain any souls; nor again that you should suppose it to have been without light and hidden in some darkness, but rather that, gleaming with the brightness of day, it waited until the setting of day and so returned to him.
11:122
apud quem etiam uesperi tenebras habere non posset. folium quoque quod secum detulit, etsi breue illud folium detulisse uideatur, spem eorum quos sui paeniteret erroris etsi non magnam, aliquam tamen significauit; folium enim sine uirgulto esse non poterat. ergo quasi germinantis correctionis licet non magnum, aliquod tamen uexit insigne et folium oleae, in qua arbore oliua generatur, ex qua oleum conficitur, quo materiale hoc lumen fouetur et tenebrarum fugatur obscuritas. quid autem magis quam lumen familiare uirtuti est?
在他那裡,即使到了傍晚也不會有黑暗。牠所帶來的那片葉子——縱然似乎只是帶回了那小小一片葉子——卻表明了一種雖不大、卻仍存的盼望,指那些當為自己的過錯悔改之人;因為葉子不能離了嫩枝而獨存。所以,這彷彿是萌發中之矯正的標誌,雖不大,卻仍是某種標誌——一片橄欖葉,橄欖樹上結出橄欖,從橄欖榨出油,這油滋養著這有形的光,並驅散黑暗的幽昧。還有什麼比光更與德行相親呢?
With whom even at evening it could not have darkness. The leaf, too, which it brought with it—even though it seems to have brought back that small leaf—signified some hope, though not great, of those who should repent of their error; for the leaf could not be without a shoot. Therefore, as of a correction beginning to sprout, it carried, though not great, yet some token—a leaf of the olive, on which tree the olive is produced, from which oil is made, by which this material light is fed and the obscurity of darkness is put to flight. And what is more familiar to virtue than light?
11:123
folium ergo et ramulus insigne est correctionis, correctio autem quasi radicem sui paenitentiam habet, quae paenitentia non potest in turbidis, sed in iis qui iam spiritalem sermonem acceperint germinare. in ore quoque non frusta ramulus oleae uidetur esse delatus, eo quod uirtus et sapientia in sermone sui habeat claritudinem et ipsa statim specie lumen eius effulgeat, maxime cum pacifica loquitur, quoniam hunc quoque ramulum pacem petentes praeferre consuerunt.
所以葉子和那小枝是矯正的標誌;而矯正彷彿以悔改為其根,這悔改不能在翻騰混亂之人裡萌發,只能在那些已經領受了屬靈之道的人裡萌發。那橄欖小枝被銜在口中,也不是徒然的,因為德行與智慧在言語中有其光輝,並在其一顯現時,它的光便發出,尤其當它說和平的話時,因為求和平的人也素來把這枝子拿在身前。
The leaf, therefore, and the little branch are a token of correction; but correction has as its root, as it were, penitence—a penitence which cannot sprout in the turbid, but in those who have already received the spiritual word. In the mouth, too, the little branch of the olive is seen to have been brought, not in vain, because virtue and wisdom have their brightness in speech, and at the very appearance its light shines forth, especially when it speaks peaceable things, since this branch too those who seek peace have been wont to carry before them.
11:124
tulit ramulum, eo quod simplicitas puritate et sinceritate semina quaedam auribus nostris utilitatis infundit et bonae doctrina uirtutis aut ad instantiam prouocat et inuitat ad praemium bonae sibi conscium disciplinae aut gerendae paenitentiae et sequendae conuersationis cupiditatem inicit peccatori. Unde praeterea cognouerit sanctus Noe quia defecerit aqua a terra, sicut scriptum est, considerandum uidetur. primo omnium secundum litteram, quia potuit intellegere siccum an umidum folium esset allatum, deinde quoniam non est huiusmodi columba, ut fructus latentes sub aqua possit eruere. sed utrum illud folium ante diluuium fuerit exortum an tempore diluuii contuendum est tibi.
牠銜來了那小枝,因為單純藉其純潔與真誠,把益處的某些種子澆灌進我們的耳中;而美善德行的教導,或是激發人殷勤、邀人得賞——它自知有美好的操守——或是在罪人心中種下行悔改、隨從新生活方式的渴望。再者,按經上所記,聖挪亞如何得知水已從地上退去,這似乎值得思想。首先,按字面而言,因為他能曉得帶給他的葉子是乾的還是濕的;其次,因為鴿子並非那種能把藏在水下的果子掏取出來的飛鳥。但那葉子究竟是在洪水之前萌發的,還是在洪水之時萌發的,這得由你來思量。
It bore the little branch, because simplicity, by its purity and sincerity, pours into our ears certain seeds of usefulness; and the teaching of good virtue either rouses to diligence and invites to a reward, conscious to itself of good discipline, or implants in the sinner a desire of doing penance and following a new way of life. Moreover, how holy Noah came to know that the water had failed from the earth, as it is written, seems worth considering. First of all, according to the letter, because he could understand whether the leaf brought to him was dry or moist; and then, because the dove is not of such a kind as to be able to draw up fruits hidden beneath the water. But whether that leaf had sprouted before the flood or at the time of the flood must be considered by you.
11:125
si ante diluuium, uir iustus gauisus est fructum de ueteri semine aliquem reseruatum et inde collegit misericordiae insigne diuinae, quod iam diluuium remouisset, quae fructum demonstraret, cui non potuissent nocere diluuia. si diluuii tempore natum est folium. aduertit utique iustus noua semina misericordiae fruticasse caelestis, ut radices arborum uiuerent et quasi resumpta anima fetus germinarent uetustos atque in adsuetos partus redirent, quorum indicium praemissa folia demonstrarent.
若是在洪水之前,義人便因見有某些果子從那舊種子中得蒙保存而歡喜,並由此收取了神聖憐憫的標誌——即洪水如今已退去,這憐憫得以顯出那洪水無法加害的果子。若那葉子是在洪水之時所生,義人便確實察覺到,天上憐憫的新種子已經萌芽,以致樹的根還活著,並彷彿靈魂得了更新,萌發出它們古老的子嗣,回復到它們慣常的孳生,這先送來的葉子便將其標誌顯明出來。
If before the flood, the just man rejoiced that some fruit had been preserved from the old seed, and from it gathered a token of divine mercy—namely that the flood had now withdrawn, which mercy might show forth the fruit to which the floods could not have done harm. If the leaf was born at the time of the flood, the just man surely perceived that new seeds of heavenly mercy had budded forth, so that the roots of the trees were alive and, as though with the soul renewed, were sprouting their ancient offspring and returning to their accustomed births, the token of which the leaves sent ahead made manifest.
11:126
sed hoc alta potius interpretatione collegit, quia dominus deus noster, quamuis acerbis iniquitatis nostrae offensus esset erroribus, tamen antiquae nobis prosapiae patriaeque uirtutis semen aliquod uel exiguum reseruaret, ne penitus operis et creaturae suae omne circa humanum genus amputaretur insigne. unde et Esaias ait: nisi dominus Sabaoth reliquisset nobis semen, sicut Sodoma facti essemus et sicut Gomorra similes fuissemus, in alterius nomine ciuitatis exprimens caecitatis indicium, in alterius nomine sterilitatem. ita enim lingua patria Chaldaei Sodomam et Gomorram nuncuparunt caecitatem et sterilitatem significantes.
但他寧可藉更深的解釋來領會這事:即主我們的神,雖因我們罪孽的苦澀過錯而受了冒犯,卻仍為我們保存了我們古老世系與本土德行的某種種子,哪怕只是微小的一點,免得祂的工作與祂受造之物對人類所有的標誌全然被剪除。因此以賽亞也說:「若不是萬軍之耶和華給我們留下種子,我們早已像所多瑪、與蛾摩拉一樣了」(賽一9),他以一城之名表達瞎眼的標誌,以另一城之名表達不育。因為迦勒底人在他們本族的語言中如此稱所多瑪與蛾摩拉,正是表示瞎眼與不育。
But he gathered this rather by a deeper interpretation: that the Lord our God, although offended by the bitter errors of our iniquity, nonetheless preserved for us some seed, even a slight one, of the virtue of our ancient lineage and homeland, lest the whole token of His work and of His creature regarding the human race should be wholly cut away. Whence Isaiah also says: 'Unless the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we would have become like Sodom and we would have been made like Gomorrah,' expressing, in the name of the one city, a sign of blindness, and in the name of the other, sterility. For thus the Chaldeans in their native tongue named Sodom and Gomorrah, signifying blindness and sterility.
11:127
meritoque dominus in huiusmodi specie ciuitatum amputauit magis humana uitia quam puniendos homines iudicauit. Tertio dimittitur columba post septem dies atque eadem non regreditur. unde consideremus, ne id quod supra diximus inueniatur esse contrarium. si uerbo quidem columba, opere autem uirtus non reuertit ad iustum, ergo destitutus est iustus et defrudatus munere suo? nequaquam. numquam enim uir huiusmodi a uirtute disiungitur nec, cum emittit ex ore iustitiam disputationemque alicuius uirtutis inducit, uirtute se exuit et imitanda aliis aequitate dispoliat, sed uice solis alios inluminat, cum radios suae lucis emittit.
主在這城邑的形象中,理當說是剪除了人的諸般惡習,而非判定要懲罰那些人。第三次,過了七日,鴿子被放出,而這同一隻鴿子卻不返回。由此讓我們思想,免得我們上面所說的被認為自相矛盾。若鴿子在言上、而德行在實上都沒有返回義人那裡,那麼義人豈不是被撇棄、被騙去了他的恩賜麼?絕非如此。因為這樣的人從不與德行分離;當他從口中發出公義、引入某種德行的論述時,他也並不脫去德行,並不剝去那要叫別人效法的公正,反倒代替太陽,在發出自己之光的光線時光照他人。
And rightly, in this image of cities, the Lord cut away human vices rather than judged men to be punished. A third time the dove is sent out after seven days, and this same dove does not return. Whence let us consider, lest what we said above be found to be contradictory. If indeed in word the dove, but in deed virtue, did not return to the just man, then has the just man been deserted and defrauded of his gift? By no means. For never is a man of this kind sundered from virtue; nor, when he sends justice forth from his mouth and brings in a discourse of some virtue, does he strip himself of virtue and despoil himself of the equity that others are to imitate; but, in the stead of the sun, he illumines others when he sends forth the rays of his own light.
11:128
ignis nempe calefacit adpropinquantes, ita ut calorem naturae suae ipse possideat. numquid deficit lux diei, cum totum mundum inluminat claritate? habet inoffensum cursum suum inlibatamque naturam. sic et ista in columbae specie uirtus, cum adhuc ferueret diluuium. secundum auem tamen in terris, secundum uirtutem in hominum passionibus reuertit ad iustum, quia in iniquorum pectoribus uirtus ut posset haerere non potuerat inuenire. et ideo in illo secundo diuorsorio sui regrediens haeret atque requiescit.
火確實溫暖那靠近它的人,以致它本身仍擁有其本性的熱。白晝之光以其光輝光照全世界時,豈會因此而虧缺麼?它保持其行程不受阻礙,其本性不被減損。照樣,這以鴿子為形象的德行,當洪水仍在翻騰之時——作為飛鳥,固然在地上,而作為德行,則在人的情慾之間——便返回到義人那裡,因為它在惡人的胸懷中尋不著可以依附之處。因此,它返回到自己那第二個居所,便依附並安息。
Fire indeed warms those who draw near, in such a way that it itself possesses the heat of its own nature. Does the light of day fail when it illumines the whole world with its brightness? It keeps its course unhindered and its nature undiminished. So too this virtue, in the image of the dove, while the flood was still seething—as a bird, indeed, upon the earth, but as virtue, amid the passions of men—returns to the just man, because in the breasts of the wicked virtue had not been able to find a place where it might cleave. And therefore, returning to that second lodging of its own, it cleaves and rests.
11:129
at uero ubi deferbuerint diluuia passionum et auditi uerbi conpertaeque doctrinae plurimi studuerint esse consortes, iam non unius patrimonium, sed commune bonum esse incipit disciplina uirtutis et tamquam sapientiae poculum hauritur a plurimis, qui ante sitientes bibere noluerunt, sicut nunc feruent diluuia in pectoribus Iudaeorum, et cum aqua doctrinae caelestis exundet, potus exuberet, non putant esse potandum. euangelium legitur, uirtus exit de sermone caelesti, tractat sacerdos in ecclesia, sed ne forte intra arcam solus positus non possit audiri, interdum et egressus ecclesiam, ubi Iudaeus occurrerit, monet, exemplum adfert caelestium scripturarum:
但實在地,當情慾的洪水退去,而很多人渴望成為他們所聽之道、所認識之教導的分享者時,德行的準則便開始不再是一人的家業,而成為共有的善,並如同一杯智慧之酒,被許多從前雖渴卻不肯飲的人所暢飲——正如如今洪水在猶太人的胸中翻騰,雖然天上教導的水滿溢、那飲料豐沛,他們卻以為不當去飲。福音被誦讀,德行從天上之道發出,祭司在教會中講解;但唯恐他孤身置於方舟之內、不能被聽見,他有時走出教會,遇見猶太人之處,便勸勉他,並從天上的經卷舉出例證:
But truly, when the floods of the passions have died down, and very many have become eager to be sharers of the word they have heard and the teaching they have come to know, then the discipline of virtue begins to be no longer the patrimony of one man but a common good, and like a cup of wisdom it is drunk by very many who before, though thirsting, refused to drink—as now the floods seethe in the breasts of the Jews, and although the water of heavenly teaching overflows and the draught abounds, they think it ought not to be drunk. The Gospel is read, virtue goes forth from the heavenly word, the priest expounds it in the church; but lest perchance, placed alone within the ark, he cannot be heard, sometimes, having gone out of the church, where he meets a Jew, he admonishes him and brings forward an example from the heavenly Scriptures:
11:130
cludunt aures, ne uel inuitos fons abluat et uerbi dominici umor aspergat. si qui uero crediderint, cun-unt ad fontem, doctrinam expetunt, insinuari sibi euangelium concupiscunt nec satiantur adsiduitate potandi. ita fonte sapientiae certatim repleri desiderant, quem ante fugere gestiebant. quem fontem? audi dicentem: si quis sitit, ueniat ad me et bibat. qui credit in me, sicut dixit scriptura, fiumina de uentre eius fluent aquae uiuae. In primo et sescentesimo anno uitae Noe primo die mensis <primi> minutam aquam dicit a facie terrae, in secundo autem mense septima et uicesima die mensis siccatam terram esse commemorat.
他們便塞住耳朵,唯恐那泉源連同他們不願也將他們洗淨,並唯恐主之道的潤澤沾濕他們。但若有人信了,他們就奔向那泉源,尋求那教導,渴望福音被灌注於他們,並不以持續暢飲為滿足。他們如此渴望從智慧的泉源得著滿足,而這泉源從前他們卻急於逃避。是什麼泉源呢?且聽那位說話者:「人若渴了,可以到我這裡來喝。信我的人,就如經上所說,從他腹中要流出活水的江河來」(約七37-38)。在挪亞六百零一歲,正月初一日,經上說水從地面上消退了;而在二月二十七日,經上記載地就乾了。
they close their ears, lest the fountain wash them even against their will and the moisture of the Lord's word besprinkle them. But if any have believed, they run to the fountain, they seek out the teaching, they long that the Gospel be instilled into them, nor are they satisfied with the constancy of their drinking. Thus they desire eagerly to be filled from the fountain of wisdom which before they were eager to flee. What fountain? Hear Him who says: 'If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink. He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, rivers of living water shall flow from his belly.' In the six hundred and first year of Noah's life, on the first day of the first month, Scripture says the water was diminished from the face of the earth; but in the second month, on the twenty-seventh day of the month, it records that the earth was dried.
11:131
quid sibi uult illa adiectio de aquae inminutione, cum supputata ratio superior annum conclusisse uideatur, qui annus a secundo mense incipit et in secundum mensem anni alterius usque progreditur, nisi forte hic iusti formam declaratam uelimus accipere, ut primus annus is fuerit, quo coepit diluuium, post sescentesimum scilicet annus primus, primus iterum annus et primus mensis post sescentesimum annum, quando minuta est aqua a facie terrae, eo quod iustus et in peccatorum generatione, quae propter delicta deleta est, uirtute primus erat et in secunda generatione, quae coepit post diluuium, primus ordine, quia primus secundae generationis fuit. et merito primus euaserat.
關於水之消退的那一附加說明是什麼意思呢?因為上面計算出來的數目似乎已結束了一年——這一年從二月起算,並延續到次年的二月——除非我們或許願意在此領受所宣示的義人的表象:即第一年就是洪水開始的那一年,也就是六百歲之後的第一年;又是六百歲之後的第一年第一月,水從地面消退之時,因為義人即使在罪人的世代中(這世代因其罪而被塗抹)也在德行上居首,而在洪水之後開始的第二世代中,他也在次序上居首,因為他是第二世代的頭一個人。他理當頭一個得了逃脫。
What does that addition about the diminishing of the water mean, since the reckoning computed above seems to have closed out a year—a year which begins from the second month and proceeds on into the second month of the following year—unless perhaps we wish to take here a figure of the just man set forth: so that the first year was that in which the flood began, namely the first year after the six hundredth, and again the first year and the first month after the six hundredth year, when the water was diminished from the face of the earth, because the just man was first in virtue even in the generation of sinners (which was blotted out on account of its sins), and in the second generation, which began after the flood, he was first in order, because he was the first of the second generation. And rightly he had escaped first.
11:132
recte enim ei honor defertur qui et primae generationis primus fuit et posterioris principium, qui meruerit et de illa euadere et isti ad seminarium propagari. cum enim alii deperissent, solus uitae egregiae merito et praerogatiua uirtutis apud deum diues non est expertus malitiae corruptelam, per quem factum est ne totum corpus generis humani uel abolitum uideretur in terris uel a dei abscisum gratia relinqueretur. Et denudauit inquit Noe tectum arcae. cum arcam, sicut supra interpretati sumus, pro specie corporis acceperimus. quid sit denudare corpus intellegamus, secundum altiorem scilicet sensum. ceterum liquet quemadmodum arca potuerit aperiri secundum litteram.
因為理當把尊榮歸給那位既是前一世代之首、又是後一世代之始的人,他既配得從前者逃脫,又配得被繁衍為後者的苗床。因為當別人都滅亡時,唯獨他憑著卓越生命的功德與德行的優先權,在神面前富足,沒有經歷惡毒的敗壞;藉著他,人類的整體既不致顯為在地上被廢除,也不致被撇下、與神的恩典隔絕。經上說:「挪亞揭開了方舟的頂蓋。」既然我們如上面所解釋的,把方舟當作身體的形象,就讓我們明白揭開身體是什麼意思——也就是按更深的意義而言。至於其餘,方舟按字面如何能被打開,這是顯明的。
For rightly is honor paid to him who was both first of the earlier generation and the beginning of the later, who deserved both to escape from the former and to be propagated for the seedbed of the latter. For when others had perished, he alone, by the merit of an excellent life and the prerogative of virtue, rich before God, did not experience the corruption of malice; through him it came to pass that the whole body of the human race should neither seem to be abolished upon the earth nor be left cut off from the grace of God. 'And Noah,' it says, 'uncovered the roof of the ark.' Since we have taken the ark, as we interpreted above, for the image of the body, let us understand what it is to uncover the body—according, namely, to the deeper sense. For the rest, it is clear in what way the ark could be opened according to the letter.
11:133
quid igitur tectum corporis humani sit. quod clausum in diluuio fuit, nisi forte delectationem accipiamus. quae operiebat hoc corpus nostrum et quasi tegebat per illum Adae errorem? et eo maxime tecti similis aestimatur, quia sensus omnis in capite, inde delectatio, quae corpus omne subiectum habebat.
那麼,在洪水中被封閉起來的人身之頂蓋是什麼呢?無非是我們把它理解為享樂罷了。這享樂遮蓋著我們這身體,並藉著亞當的那一過犯彷彿給它蒙上了帷幕。它之所以特別被判為像頂蓋,是因為一切感覺都在頭部,享樂由此而生,並使全身都伏在它之下。
What, then, is the roof of the human body, which was closed up in the flood, unless perhaps we take it to be pleasure? Pleasure which covered this our body and as it were veiled it through that error of Adam. And it is judged to be especially like a roof, because all sense is in the head; thence comes pleasure, which had the whole body subject to it.
11:134
sed ubi mens iusti uiri sobria atque integra a corruptione diluuii diuinae cognitionis inflammata desiderio exilire atque euolare uoluit in superiora, detexit omnia quae erant impedimento et speciem uoluptatis, quae quodam operimento ceteras partes tegebat corporis, redoperuit ac retexit, ut non solum corpus a seruitio dominatricis ignobilis liberaret, uerum etiam ea quae erant incorporalia comprehenderet; quae enim non uidentur aeterna sunt. et ideo iustus quem non uidebat dominum requirebat corruptelae exors, cupidus aeternitatis. quod autem ait primum mensem uel secundum eumque esse uerni temporis diem, habes et alibi dictum: hic mensis primus erit uobis in diebus anni.
但當義人那清醒而完整的心智,被認識神之渴望所點燃,願意躍起、飛入高處、脫離洪水的敗壞時,它便揭開一切作為攔阻之物,並把享樂的形貌再次裸露、揭開——這享樂曾以某種遮蓋物遮住身體的其餘部分——好使它不僅把身體從那卑賤女主人的奴役中釋放出來,也能抓住那些無形之物;因為那不能看見的乃是永遠的(林後四18)。因此,這位義人脫離了敗壞、渴慕永恆,便尋求他所未曾看見的主。至於經上說正月或二月、並說那是春令的日子,你在別處也讀到這話:「這月要作你們年間月份的首月」(出十二2)。
But when the mind of the just man, sober and whole, kindled by desire of divine knowledge, wished to leap up and fly away into things on high from the corruption of the flood, it uncovered all the things that were a hindrance, and it laid bare again and unveiled the appearance of pleasure, which with a certain covering veiled the other parts of the body—so that it might not only free the body from the service of an ignoble mistress, but might also lay hold of the things that are incorporeal; for the things which are not seen are eternal. And therefore the just man, free from corruption and desirous of eternity, sought the Lord whom he did not see. But as for its saying the first or second month, and that it is a day of the spring season, you have it said elsewhere also: 'This month shall be for you the first among the days of the year.'
11:135
qui enim in gratia primus post periculum, hic recte praerogatiuam primi mensis accepit. ne te autem moueat quod diximus supra folium in ramo repertum post diluuium potuisse generari, etsi sub aqua plerumque herbae soleant germinare. tamen ut scrupulus omnis possit auferri, quid magnum si deo iubente uno die quo inminuta fuerit aqua statim germinauit et terra, cum idem sit fructuum reparator et conditor atque operis sui usum non fuerit oblitus?
因為那在危難之後在恩典中居首的人,這人理當領受了首月的優先權。但不要因我們上面所說、那長在枝上的葉子可能是在洪水之後生出的,而心生不安,雖然青草大多慣於在水下萌發。然而,為使一切疑慮得以除去,若在神的吩咐下,就在水消退的那一天,地立刻萌芽,這又有何稀奇?既然同一位神既是果實的修復者、又是其締造者,並未忘記祂自己工作的用處。
For he who is first in grace after the peril, this man rightly received the prerogative of the first month. But do not let it disturb you that we said above that the leaf found on the branch could have been produced after the flood, even though for the most part herbs are wont to sprout beneath the water. Yet, that every scruple may be removed, what great thing is it if, at God's command, on the one day on which the water was diminished, the earth straightway sprouted—since the same God is both the restorer and the founder of fruits, and was not forgetful of the use of His own work?
11:136
denique habes in exordio statim quod iusserit ut terra herbam pabuli germinaret et lignum fructiferum cum fructu suoet statim eiecit terra herbam pabuli habentem semen secundum genus et lignum fructiferumet ille dies unus fuerit, quo haec deus iussit aut fecit. ergo beneficii sui deus non inmemor, inmemor autem nostrae iniquitatis opus suum eiusdem qua coepit temporis quantitate reparauit. Et dixit dominus deus ad Noe: exi de arcatu et uxor tua et filii tui. itaque recedente aqua et siccata terra exire Noe potuit de arca. sed iustus nihil sibi adrogat. sed totum se diuino committit imperio.
末了,你在起初就讀到,祂吩咐地要長出供食的青草和結果子的樹木連同其果子——「地就立刻長出供食的青草,各從其類含有種子,又有結果子的樹木」——而那是一日之間的事,神就在那一日吩咐或造成了這些。所以神並非不記念自己的恩惠,卻是不記念我們的罪孽,便以祂起初動工時所用的同等時間長度修復了祂自己的工作。神對挪亞說:「你和你的妻子、兒子要從方舟出來。」於是水退了、地乾了,挪亞便能從方舟出來。但義人不為自己擅取什麼,反倒把自己全然交託於神的命令。
Finally, you have in the very beginning that He commanded that the earth should sprout the herb of pasture and the fruit-bearing tree with its fruit—'and straightway the earth put forth the herb of pasture having seed according to its kind, and the fruit-bearing tree'—and that was one single day, on which God commanded or made these things. Therefore God, not unmindful of His own benefit, but unmindful of our iniquity, restored His own work in the same measure of time in which He had begun it. And the Lord God said to Noah: 'Go forth from the ark, you and your wife and your sons.' And so, the water receding and the earth dried, Noah was able to go forth from the ark. But the just man arrogates nothing to himself; rather he commits himself wholly to the divine command.
11:137
et maxime qui caelesti fuerat ingressus oraculo caeleste debuit ut egrederetur expectare responsum; uerecunda enim iustitia est, quia inuerecunda iniquitas, quae usurpat indebita nec reueretur auctorem. nunc quaeramus qua ratione quamdiu ingrediebantur in arcam hic ordo fuit ingredientium, ut primo ipse ingrederetur et filii eius, inde uxor eius et uxores filiorum eius. quando autem exierunt commutatum sit. nam scriptum est: exiuit ipse et uxor eius et Filii eius et uxores filiorum eius. et littera quidem significat in ingressu abstinentiam gene-260 rationis, in egressu generationis usum.
尤其那藉天上神諭而進入的人,理當等候天上的回應才出去;因為公義是有所節制的,既然罪孽是無節制的——它僭取不當得之物,並不敬畏它的締造者。如今讓我們探問:當他們進入方舟時,進入者的次序何以是這樣:他自己先進去,與他的兒子們,然後是他的妻子和他兒子們的妻子。但他們出來時,次序卻變了。因為經上記著:「他自己出來,與他的妻子、兒子們和他兒子們的妻子。」字面確實表明:在進入時,乃禁絕生育;在出來時,乃可用生育。
And most of all, he who had entered by a heavenly oracle ought to await a heavenly response in order to go forth; for justice is modest, since iniquity is immodest, which usurps things not due and does not reverence its Author. Now let us ask by what reasoning, as long as they were entering the ark, this was the order of those entering: that he himself entered first and his sons, then his wife and the wives of his sons. But when they went out, the order was changed. For it is written: 'He himself went out, and his wife and his sons and the wives of his sons.' And the letter indeed signifies, in the entrance, abstinence from generation; in the going forth, the use of generation.
11:138
tunc enim pater cum filiis prius introiuit et filii cum parente et postea uxor eius et filiorum eius uxores, id est non commiscetur sexus in introitu, commiscetur in egressu. aperte igitur uelut ordine ipso ingressionis uocem quandam iustus emittit, tempus illud non esse concubitus neque deliciarum, quo omnibus immineret interitus. unde in euangelio dominus ait reprehendens quod temporibus Noe manducarent et biberent, uxores ducerent et filias suas nuptum traderent, et ideo propter intemperantiam eorum superuenisse diluuium.
因為那時父親與兒子們先進去,兒子們與其父親同進,然後才是他的妻子和他兒子們的妻子——這就是說,在進入時兩性不相混,在出來時才相混。所以,藉著進入的這一次序,義人公然發出某種聲音:當毀滅威脅眾人之時,那時節並非同房或享樂之時。因此在福音書中,主責備說:在挪亞的日子,人又吃又喝,娶妻嫁女,因此洪水就因他們的放縱無度臨到他們(參太二四38)。
For then the father with the sons entered first, and the sons with their parent, and afterward his wife and the wives of his sons—that is, the sexes were not mingled at the entrance, but were mingled at the going forth. Openly, therefore, by the very order of entering, the just man utters a certain voice: that the time was not one of intercourse nor of delights, when destruction threatened all. Whence in the Gospel the Lord says, rebuking the fact that in the days of Noah they ate and drank, took wives and gave their daughters in marriage, and therefore on account of their intemperance the flood came upon them.
11:139
maeroris igitur tempus illud, non laetitiae erat, et inde iustus consortio non delectabatur uxoris uel filii iusti petebant copulam coniugalemquam enim indecorum ut quo tempore uiuentes morerentur, tunc perituri generarentur! — postea autem recte ad seminarium ceterorum successit usus et cura coniugii, cum diluuium recessit. itaque non uiri cum uiris, sed feminae cum uiris exeunt, ut uirilis in se interdicta permixtio, permissa autem uirilis et feminea legitima sorte coniugii copula uideretur.
所以那時節乃是哀傷之時,而非歡樂之時;因此義人不以與妻子的相伴為樂,那些義子也不尋求夫妻的結合——因為何等不合宜:正當活人在死亡之際,那些註定要滅亡的人卻在那時被生出來!但日後,洪水退去之時,婚姻的運用與顧惜便理當為其餘人的苗床而繼起。因此出來的不是男人與男人,而是女人與男人,好叫男性彼此之間的相混顯為被禁止的,而男與女按婚姻合法的分定所成的結合卻顯為被允許的。
That time, therefore, was a time of mourning, not of gladness; and hence the just man took no delight in the fellowship of his wife, nor did the just sons seek conjugal union—for how unseemly it would be that, at the very time when the living were dying, those destined to perish should then be begotten! But afterward, rightly, when the flood had receded, the use and care of marriage succeeded for the seedbed of the rest. And so it is not men with men, but women with men, that go forth, so that the manly mingling among themselves should appear forbidden, but the union of man and woman, by the lawful lot of marriage, permitted.
11:140
sensus autem altior hoc habet, <ut\\ ubi periculum est, uiriles quaedam et fortiores disceptationes menti adhaereant et eo se mens quasi quadam tueatur subole filiorum, quo tempestatibus et grauioribus passionibus acies quaedam uirilis occurrat. decurso autem periculo nihil obest, si molliores cogitationes ualidioribus copulentur, non ut effeminentur a mollioribus fortiores, sed ut molliores sensus uelut quibusdam uirilibus roborentur, cum omnia consilia nostra ad uirtutem iustitiam integritatem fortitudinem dirigantur et quodam usu seminarioque uirtutem creari atque adolescere possint ualidiora consilia.
但更深的意義含有這點:在有危險之處,某些剛強而較有力的思慮當依附心智,使心智彷彿藉著兒子們的某種子嗣來自衛,好使在暴風與更沉重的情慾面前,有某種剛強的陣線前來迎戰。但當危險過去之後,若把較柔的思想聯於較強的思想,也並無妨礙——不是叫較強的被較柔的弄得柔弱,而是叫較柔的領悟彷彿被某些剛強之物所堅固,因為我們一切的籌算都當朝向德行、公義、純全與剛毅,並藉著德行的某種操練與苗床,使更有力的籌算得以生成、長大。
But the deeper sense holds this: that, where there is peril, certain manly and stronger deliberations should cleave to the mind, and that the mind should as it were guard itself by a certain offspring of sons, so that against tempests and graver passions a certain manly battle-line might come to meet them. But when the peril has run its course, there is no hindrance if softer thoughts be joined to the stronger ones—not so that the stronger should be made effeminate by the softer, but so that the softer perceptions might be strengthened as it were by certain manly ones, since all our counsels are directed toward virtue, justice, integrity, and fortitude, and by a certain practice and seedbed of virtue the stronger counsels can be created and grow up.
11:141
non est igitur utile, cum uitiorum aliqua confusio est, quae mentem occupet, serere aliquas cogitationes atque generare et parturire mentem. cum autem compressae fuerint cupiditates et mens requieuerit, tunc seminario quodam disceptationis accepto uirtutes possunt et bona opera germinare. Et aedificauit inquit Noe aram deo. qua ratione supra dominus admonuit quae faceret et fecit Noe omnia, hoc autem quod non admonitus est fecerit fortasse quaeratur. sed utique dominus non debuit quasi auarus mercedem gratiae postulare et iustus eam intellexit ueram actionem gratiarum esse, quae non iuberetur, sed deferretur. itaque nec dilationem passus est.
所以,當有某種惡習的混亂佔據心智時,去播撒某些思想、生育並使心智懷負它們,這並非有益。但當貪慾被壓制、心智得了安息時,那時領受了思慮的某種苗床,德行與善工便能萌發。經上說:「挪亞為神築了一座壇。」這是什麼緣故呢?上面主曾囑咐挪亞當行之事,挪亞也行了一切,如今他卻行了這未蒙囑咐之事?也許有人會這樣發問。但主斷不該像貪婪之人,索討恩典的回報;而義人也明白:真正的感謝乃是那不蒙吩咐、卻自願獻上的。因此他毫不耽延。
It is not, therefore, useful, when there is some confusion of vices that occupies the mind, to sow certain thoughts and to generate and bring the mind to bear them. But when the desires have been pressed down and the mind has come to rest, then, a certain seedbed of deliberation having been received, virtues and good works can sprout. 'And Noah,' it says, 'built an altar to God.' For what reason, when above the Lord admonished what Noah should do and Noah did all things, did he now do this which he was not admonished to do? Perhaps the question is raised. But surely the Lord ought not, like a greedy man, to demand the recompense of grace; and the just man understood that the true rendering of thanks is one that is not commanded but offered. And so he suffered no delay.
11:142
etenim grata animi uirtus passionem dubitationis excludit; qui autem debitor gratiae ut a se exigatur expectat ingratus est. quod autem aedificauit inquit deo et non dixit domino, sed deo, secundum nominis interpretationem non coacta uidetur haec actio esse gratiarum quasi domino, sed uirtus iusti morigera et grata. quasi deo quod imperiale est sequestrauit, quod beneficii nominauit. et sumpsit a bestiis et a uolatilibus mundis et obtulit inquit holocausta. littera euidens est quod ea quae incontaminata sunt debemus offerre, in quibus affectus reluceat offerentis, altior autem interpretatio hoc habet, quod bestiae mundae uidentur sensus esse sapientis, uolatilia autem intellectus.
因為靈魂那感恩的德行排除了猶疑的情慾;但那身為恩典之債務人、卻等候恩典被向他索討的人,便是忘恩的。經上說他築壇「歸給神(Deus)」,而不說「歸給主(Dominus)」,乃說「歸給神」——按名稱的解釋,這感謝似乎不是被強迫的、彷彿向主人而獻,而是義人那順服而感恩之德行。彷彿他把屬於王權之名的歸給了神,而把屬於恩惠之名的稱述出來。經上說:「他取了潔淨的走獸和潔淨的飛鳥,獻為燔祭。」字面是明白的,即我們當獻上那些無玷污之物,使獻祭者的情意得以在其中發光;但更深的解釋含有這點:潔淨的走獸被看為智者的諸感官,而飛鳥則是其悟性,
For indeed the grateful virtue of the soul excludes the passion of hesitation; but he who, being a debtor of grace, waits for it to be exacted of him, is ungrateful. But the fact that it says he built 'to God,' and did not say 'to the Lord,' but 'to God'—according to the interpretation of the name, this rendering of thanks seems not to be compelled, as though to a master, but to be the virtue of the just man, compliant and grateful. As though he set apart for God what is of imperial authority, and named what is of benefit. 'And he took of the clean beasts and of the clean birds, and offered,' it says, 'holocausts.' The letter is plain, that we ought to offer those things which are uncontaminated, in which the affection of the offerer may shine forth; but the deeper interpretation holds this: that the clean beasts are seen to be the senses of the wise man, and the birds his understanding.
11:143
qui sunt longe subtiliores atque leuiores. Nunc uero consideremus diligentius quid sit quod ait quia dixit dominus deus recogitans: non adiciam maledicere terram propter opera hominum, quia permanet cor hominis diligenter super mala a iuuentute. non ergo adhuc addet percutere omnem carnem, sicut fecit, omnibus diebus terrae. etsi uindicauerat in hominum genus, tamen cognouerat quia uindicta legis ad timorem proficit et cognitionem doctrinae magis quam ad naturae commutationem, quae corrigi in aliquibus potest, in omnibus mutari non potest.
而這些則精細得多、輕妙得多。但如今讓我們更殷勤地思想祂所說之事,就是主神思量著說:「我不再因人的作為咒詛地,因為人從幼年起,心就殷勤地專注於惡。所以我不再像我所行的那樣,在地的一切日子擊打凡有血肉的。」祂雖曾對人類施行刑罰,卻仍認識到:律法的刑罰有助於使人懼怕、有助於認識其教導,過於有助於本性的改變——這本性在某些人身上能被矯正,卻不能在眾人身上被改變。
which are far more subtle and lighter. But now let us consider more diligently what it is that He says, that the Lord God, reflecting, said: 'I will not again curse the earth because of the works of men, since the heart of man is set diligently upon evil from his youth. Therefore I will not again strike all flesh, as I have done, all the days of the earth.' Even though He had taken vengeance upon the race of men, He had nonetheless recognized that the vengeance of the law avails toward fear and the knowledge of teaching rather than toward a change of nature—a nature which can be corrected in some, but cannot be changed in all.
11:144
uindicauit ergo dominus ut timeremus, pepercit ut reseruaremur, et uindicauit semel ad exemplum timoris, pepercit m reliquum, ne dominaretur semper amaritudo peccati, simul quia si quis peccata cupiat frequentius uindicare, asper magis quam censorius habetur. ideoque dicit deus: non adiciam maledicere terram propter opera hominum, id est quia pietatem suam circa uniuersitatem hominum uoluit declarare et tamen securitatem et neglegentiam quandam mentibus humanis adferre non debuit, in paucos uindicat, plures reseruat. deinde cum dicit:
所以主施行刑罰,是要叫我們懼怕;祂寬容,是要叫我們得蒙保存;祂施行刑罰一次,作為懼怕的鑒戒;祂寬容其餘的,免得罪的苦澀永遠轄制人;同時也是因為,人若渴望過於頻繁地報應罪愆,就被視為苛酷,而非執法者。所以神說:「我不再因人的作為咒詛地」——這就是說,因為祂願意宣告祂對全人類的慈憐,然而又不該給人的心智帶來某種安逸與疏忽:祂刑罰少數人,保存多數人。接著,當祂說:
The Lord, therefore, took vengeance that we might fear; He spared that we might be preserved; and He took vengeance once, for an example of fear; He spared for the rest, lest the bitterness of sin should always have dominion; and at the same time because, if anyone should desire to avenge sins too frequently, he is held to be harsh rather than censorious. And therefore God says: 'I will not again curse the earth because of the works of men'—that is, because He willed to declare His mercy concerning the whole of mankind, and yet ought not to bring a certain security and negligence upon human minds: He takes vengeance upon a few, He preserves the many. Then, when He says:
11:145
non adiciam, ostendit quod ableuet magis aerumnas hominum quam ingrauet sciens quod penitus peccata hominum auferri non queant, tamquam in prouerbio ut si quis reti subtili haurire aquam cupiat, sic qui malitiam ei pectoribus hominum conetur auferre. non adicium inquit maledicere terrae propter peccata hominum, quia permanet sensus hominis diligenter super mala a iuuentute. uide quomodo studiose nos delinquere deus significet dicendo permanere super mala sensum hominis diligenter, quo dicto siguificare uidetur diligenter cor hominis ad peccata propendere et inesse principali nostro lubricum delinquendi et quod peius est studium non deesse.
「我不再」,祂便顯明祂是減輕人的艱苦,而非加重,因為祂知道人的罪不能被全然除去——如俗諺所說:正如人若想用細目的網去舀水,那設法把惡毒從人胸中除去的人也是如此。祂說:「我不再因人的罪咒詛地,因為人從幼年起,心思就殷勤地專注於惡。」且看神如何表明我們是刻意犯罪,竟說人的心思殷勤地專注於惡——祂藉這話似乎要表明:人的心殷勤地傾向諸罪,且在我們的主導官能中有一種犯罪的滑溜,更糟的是,犯罪的熱衷並不缺乏。
'I will not again,' He shows that He lightens the hardships of men rather than aggravates them, knowing that the sins of men cannot be utterly taken away—as in the proverb, that just as if anyone should wish to draw up water with a fine-meshed net, so is he who tries to take away malice from the breasts of men. 'I will not again,' He says, 'curse the earth because of the sins of men, since the perception of man remains diligently upon evil from his youth.' See how God signifies that we sin studiously, by saying that the perception of man remains diligently upon evil—by which saying He seems to signify that the heart of man is diligently inclined toward sins, and that in our governing faculty there is a slipperiness of sinning, and what is worse, that the zeal for it is not lacking.
11:146
ideo enim ait diligenter, quasi solliciti simus, ne immunitas culpae nobis possit obrepere. deinde non in unum malum dixit, sed in multa mala et a iuuentute addidit; ex illa enim aetate crescit malitia, licet alibi legerimus quod non sit sine peccato nec unius diei infans, sed et infantia sine peccato non sit propter corporis infirmitatem, diligentia autem et studium peccandi incipiat a iuuentute, ut puer quasi infirmus peccet, iuuenis tamquam inprobus, qui studiose cupiat peccata. committere et in criminibus glorietur; apud plerosque enim innocentia pro ignauia et culpa pro laude habetur. ita se luxuria et deliciis et adulteriorum affectibus iuuenes iactare consuerunt.
因為祂說「殷勤地」,彷彿我們唯恐免於過犯的處境會悄悄臨到我們。再者,祂不說傾向「一種」惡,而說傾向「眾多」惡,又加上「從幼年起」;因為惡毒從那年歲起便增長,雖然我們在別處讀到,就連一日的嬰孩也不是無罪的,而嬰孩之所以非無罪,乃因身體的軟弱;至於犯罪的殷勤與熱衷,則從青年起始——以致孩童彷彿因軟弱而犯罪,青年則彷彿因頑劣而犯罪,他刻意渴望犯罪,並以自己的罪行為榮;因為在很多人中間,純真被視為怯懦,過犯卻被當作讚譽。青年人就這樣慣於以奢華、享樂和姦淫的情慾自誇。
For He says 'diligently,' as though we were anxious lest an immunity from fault should creep up on us. Then He did not say into one evil, but into many evils, and added 'from his youth'; for from that age malice grows, although elsewhere we have read that not even an infant of one day is without sin, but neither is infancy without sin on account of the infirmity of the body, while diligence and zeal in sinning begin from youth—so that the boy sins as though weak, the young man as though wicked, who studiously desires to commit sins and glories in his crimes; for among very many, innocence is held to be cowardice and fault is reckoned for praise. Thus young men have been wont to boast in luxury and in delights and in the inclinations of adulteries.
11:147
crescit ergo cum aetatibus culpa. omne igitur genus hominum iam non consumendum declarat, cum dicit: non adiciam percutere omnem carnem, sed in parte uindicta seruatur. Quid sit etiam quod ait: semen et messis, frigus et aestusaestasetuerdieetnoctenoni\'equiescent. quod secundum litteram significat permansura manentibus secundum institutionem domini et statum suum temporibus incorrupta futura animalia uel nemorosa omnia. nam cum comimpuntur tempora, corrumpuntur etiam illa quae temporibus suis quaeque gignuntur. si autem confusio sittemporum, quomodo possunt confusione facta etiam ea quae sunt gignentia permanere?
所以過犯隨著年歲增長。那麼祂宣告:人類的整體如今不再被毀滅,因祂說:「我不再擊打凡有血肉的」,刑罰只在一部分上被保留。祂所說的那話——「撒種收割、寒暑、夏與春、晝與夜永不停息」——這按字面而言,乃表明它們將要長存,照著主的設立與它們各按時令的本狀而長存,眾活物在將來必不朽壞,一切林木亦然。因為當時令敗壞時,那些各按其時令所生之物也隨之敗壞。但若時令混亂,那麼一旦混亂發生,那些有生育能力之物又怎能長存呢?
Fault, therefore, grows with the years. He declares, then, that the whole race of men is now not to be consumed, when He says: 'I will not again strike all flesh,' but vengeance is reserved in part. What that also is which He says—'seed and harvest, cold and heat, summer and spring, day and night shall not cease'—this, according to the letter, signifies that they will abide, abiding according to the Lord's institution and their own state in their seasons, the animals being incorrupt in the future, and all the woodlands. For when the seasons are corrupted, those things also are corrupted which are generated each in their own seasons. But if there is a confusion of seasons, how can those things which are generative remain, once confusion has been made?
11:148
ergo tempora sunt quae aut corrumpunt aut reseruant, prout ipsa sui habuerint qualitatem. ideoque annus ex contrariis ducitur, uere autumno aestate atque hieme. sicut armonia cantilenae permixtis grauibus et acutis uidetur consistere, sic ergo et mundus iste ex contrariis continetur, aere et terra, igni et aqua. nostra quoque corpora frigore et calore, umore et siccitate quendam naturae ordinem seruant. nam si naturalis ordo ac mensura confunditur, tunc necesse est sequatur interitus. ergo certum ordinem temporum dominus remota confusione diluuii ad peraeuerantiam mundi promittit futurum. altior autem sensus hoc habet, ut per semen intellegamus principium, per messem inteliegamus finem.
所以是時令在敗壞或保存,全憑它們各自所具的性質如何。為此緣故,一年由相反之物構成——春、秋、夏、冬。正如歌曲的和聲被看為由高低音調相混而成,照樣,這世界也由相反之物維繫:由氣與地、火與水。我們的身體也藉著寒與熱、濕與乾,保守著本性的某種秩序。因為若本性的秩序與分量被攪亂,那時毀滅就必然隨之而來。所以主既除去了洪水的混亂,便應許時令必有固定的秩序,以維世界的長存。但更深的意義含有這點:我們當以「種子」領會起初,以「收割」領會終末。
Therefore it is the seasons that either corrupt or preserve, according as they themselves possess their proper quality. And for this reason the year is drawn from contraries—spring, autumn, summer, and winter. Just as the harmony of a song is seen to consist of low and high notes mingled together, so therefore this world too is held together from contraries: from air and earth, fire and water. Our bodies also preserve a certain order of nature by cold and heat, moisture and dryness. For if the natural order and measure is confounded, then destruction must necessarily follow. Therefore the Lord, the confusion of the flood being removed, promises that a fixed order of seasons shall be for the permanence of the world. But the deeper sense holds this: that by 'seed' we should understand the beginning, by 'harvest' we should understand the end.
11:149
in utroque salutis est causa. alterum sine altero inperfectum est, quia ait: \'ubi principium est, finis quaeritur nec potest esse sublato fine principium et finis in principium recumt.\' ergo semper in eadem recursurum, dum in hoc mundo est, genus memorat humanum, ut cum incipit annus, finiatur, cum finitur, incipiat, non medio mundus tempore resoluatur. ita et mens quando aliquid uidetur incipere, ad finem usque contendat et operis sui terminum quaerat.
在這兩者之中都有救恩的緣由。其一若無其二便是不完全的,因為經上說:「有起初之處,便有終末可尋;終末若被除去,便不能有起初,而終末又回歸入起初。」所以他記載:人類只要還在這世界裡,就必常回歸到同一點:年既開始,便要結束;既結束,便又開始;免得世界在時間的中途消解。照樣,心智當它似乎開始一事時,也當奮力直到終末,並尋求其工作的終點。
In both there is the cause of salvation. The one without the other is incomplete, for it says: 'Where there is a beginning, an end is sought; nor can there be a beginning with the end taken away, and the end returns into the beginning.' Therefore he records that, so long as it is in this world, the human race will always recur to the same point: that, when the year begins, it may end; when it ends, it may begin; lest the world be dissolved in the midst of time. So too the mind, when it seems to begin something, let it strive on even to the end and seek the term of its work.
11:150
quando finit aliquod opus\', non quasi consummato opere ferietur, sed in alia recurrat opera et semper incrementa uirtutis exerceat, quando quidem uidet quod in fructus suos semper terra reuocetur, qui diuersi aut uere et aestate ut in partibus orientis aut aestate autumnoque nascantur ut in partibus occidentis. alio tempore ten-arum seminaria partus suos edunt, alio autem tempore fructus arborum carpimus. diuidui ergo fructus sunt necessarii et uoluptarii: necessarii ex seminibus ten\'arum, at uero ex arborum fructibus uoluptarii. itaque corpus nostrum tamquam uere, hoc est >ἔαρι , cibo pascitur naturali. ἔαρ autem Graeco nomine, uer Latino dicitur.
當心智完成某項工作時,不要彷彿工作已告完成便休假停歇,而要轉向別的工作,並常常操練德行的增長,既然它確實看見地總被召回去結它自己的果子——這些不同的果子,或在春夏結出,如在東方諸地;或在夏秋結出,如在西方諸地。在這一時節,土地的苗床產出它們的子嗣;在另一時節,我們則採摘樹上的果子。所以果子有兩類,必需的與享用的:必需的出於土地的種子,而享用的出於樹上的果子。因此我們的身體,彷彿在春天——即在「éar(春)」之時——以本性的食物得餵養。因為「éar」在希臘文的名稱中,在拉丁文裡稱為「ver(春)」。
When it finishes some work, let it not as it were take holiday as though the work were consummated, but let it recur to other works and always exercise the increases of virtue, since indeed it sees that the earth is always recalled to its own fruits—diverse fruits which are born either in spring and summer, as in the regions of the East, or in summer and autumn, as in the regions of the West. At one time the seedbeds of the lands put forth their offspring, but at another time we gather the fruits of the trees. The fruits, therefore, are of two kinds, necessary and pleasurable: the necessary from the seeds of the lands, but the pleasurable from the fruits of the trees. And so our body, as it were in spring—that is, in 'ear' (éar)—is fed with natural food. For 'éar' in the Greek name is called 'ver' in the Latin.
11:151
ideo scriptura de partibus orientis et maxime Aegypti, per quam transiuit Hebraeus, uel ex partibus Phoeniciae sumpsit exemplum. anima autem uoluptariis, hoc est sapientiae fructibus alitur, cui iterum, ut corpori nostro contrarium frigus et aestus, ita timor et iracundia uidentur aduersa. sed quia in corpore est, necesse est et iracundiam habeat et timorem, nec potest sine hac esse corporeae necessitate naturae. et ideo mens sapientis moderamina iusta dispensat, ne iram et timorem permisceat et fiat confusio quaedam animo illius atque diluuium. die quoque et nocte quod ait, per diem intellegis inluminantem uirtutem, per noctem recognoscis tenebrosam insipientiam.
因此聖經乃取材於東方諸地,尤其是希伯來人所經過的埃及。然而靈魂是藉著喜樂——也就是智慧的果子——得著滋養;對它而言,正如冷與熱與我們的身體相違,懼怕與忿怒也顯為敵對。然而因為靈魂處於身體之中,它就必然兼有忿怒與懼怕,按著身體本性的必然,不能沒有這些。所以智慧人的心思施以公義的節制,免得將忿怒與懼怕相混,以致他的靈裡生出某種混亂與洪流。至於經上所說的「晝與夜」,你藉著白晝領會那光照的能力,藉著黑夜認出那黑暗的愚昧。
And so Scripture took its example from the regions of the East, and especially from Egypt, through which the Hebrew passed. But the soul is nourished by pleasures—that is, by the fruits of wisdom—and to it, just as cold and heat are contrary to our body, so fear and anger appear hostile. Yet because it is in the body, it must of necessity have both anger and fear, nor can it be without these, by the necessity of bodily nature. And therefore the mind of the wise man dispenses just restraints, lest it mingle anger and fear and there arise a certain confusion and flood in his soul. And as for what it says, 'day and night,' by the day you understand the illuminating power, by the night you recognize the dark folly.
11:152
itaque et in timore tamquam in frigore potest esse inluminans uirtus. similiter et iracundiam potest reprimere temperantia, ut in timore aliqui non penitus resoluatur et magis timore dirigatur ad opera uirtutis, uerbi gratia si persecutor insistat, ut plus deum timeas et perpetua magis supplicia quam praesentia putes esse uitanda, quae dum times, accendaris ad gloriam perfidiae iratus et sceleri, rursus iracundia succensus diuino commotionem timore modereris. Et benedixit dominus Noe et filios eius dicens: crescite et multiplicamini et replete terram et dominamini eius.
因此即便在懼怕中,正如在寒冷中,那光照的能力仍能存在。同樣,節制能制伏忿怒,使人在懼怕中不至完全瓦解,反倒藉著懼怕被引向德行的作為——譬如說,若有逼迫者向他施壓,使你更加敬畏神,並判斷永遠的刑罰比眼前的更當躲避;當你懼怕這些時,你便被激發向榮耀,向背信和罪惡發怒,又因怒火中燒,便藉著對神的敬畏節制你心中的激動。神就賜福給挪亞和他的眾子,說:你們要生養眾多,遍滿地面,治理這地。
And so even in fear, as in cold, the illuminating power can be present. Likewise temperance can restrain anger, so that in fear a man is not utterly dissolved but is rather, through fear, directed toward works of virtue—for instance, if a persecutor presses upon him, so that you fear God the more and judge that eternal punishments are more to be shunned than present ones; and while you fear these, you are kindled toward glory, angered at faithlessness and at wickedness, and again, inflamed with anger, you temper your agitation by the fear of God. And the Lord blessed Noah and his sons, saying: Increase and multiply and fill the earth and have dominion over it.
11:153
et timor uestri et tremor erit omnibus bestiis terrae et omnibus auibus caeli et in omnibus quae mouentur super terram et in omnibus piscibus maris. haec praerogatiua potestatis in cetera animalia. uidetur homini adtributa et in superioribus partibus, sed eo loco ubi dixit quod deus hominem ad imaginem dei fecit, <ait>: masculum et feminam fecit eos et benedixit eos dicens: crescite et multiplicamini et replete terram et do minamini eius et potestatem habete super pisces maris et uolatilia et bestias terrae et reptilia. quod eo admonui, ut intellegas geminam) hominis generationem expressam: unam secundum imaginem dei, alteram secundum figmentum de luto terrae.
地上的一切走獸、空中的一切飛鳥、地上一切活動的物、海中的一切魚類,都必懼怕你們,驚恐你們。這管理其餘活物的特權,在前面的經文中似乎也賜給了人;但在那說神照著神的形像造人之處,又加上:「神造男造女,並且賜福給他們,說:你們要生養眾多,遍滿地面,治理這地,也要管理海裡的魚、空中的鳥,和地上的走獸、爬物。」我提這話,是要你明白:人有雙重的被造被表明出來——一是照著神的形像,一是照著用地上塵土所摶成的形體。
And the fear and dread of you shall be upon all the beasts of the earth and upon all the birds of heaven and upon all things that move upon the earth and upon all the fishes of the sea. This prerogative of power over the other living creatures seems to be granted to man also in the earlier passages; but in that place where it says that God made man to the image of God, it adds: male and female he made them, and blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply and fill the earth and have dominion over it, and have power over the fishes of the sea and the birds and the beasts of the earth and the creeping things. This I have noted so that you may understand that a twofold generation of man is expressed: the one according to the image of God, the other according to the molding from the clay of the earth.
11:154
denique illa creatio hominis de luto terrae uidetur esse facta post mundum, postquam requieuit deus ab operibus suis. sero quodammodo terrenae statuae figmentum gignitur. non erat pluuia super terram nec homo terram operabatur. tunc de limo terrae finxit deus hominem et insufflauit in faciem eius spiritum uitae, et factus est homo in animam uiuentem. ille autem qui sexto die quasi perfecto numero, quo omnia conclusa sunt opera dei, quasi perfecta operatione constitutus est homo secundum imaginem dei est <factus>. cui etiam iste comparatur qui in diluuio iustus inuentus est.
總之,那從地上塵土被造的人,似乎是在世界之後、在神歇了他一切的工之後才造的。那地上塑像的摶成,可說是在後來才出生的。那時地上沒有雨,也沒有人耕地。於是神用地上的泥摶成了人,將生氣吹在他臉上,他就成了有靈的活人。但那另一個人,乃是在第六日——如同在一個完全的數目上,神一切的工都藉此得以完成——彷彿藉著完全的工作被立定,是照著神的形像被造的。與他相比的,正是那在洪水中被尋見為義的人。
In short, that creation of man from the clay of the earth seems to have been made after the world, after God had rested from his works. In a manner, the molding of the earthen statue is brought forth late. There was no rain upon the earth, nor did man till the earth. Then God fashioned man from the mire of the earth and breathed into his face the breath of life, and man became a living soul. But that other man, who on the sixth day—as upon a perfect number, by which all the works of God were brought to completion—was established as it were by a perfect operation, was made according to the image of God. To him is also compared this man who in the flood was found righteous.
11:155
et ideo supra terrena omnia eum constituit deus, sicut et illum ad imaginem dei factum, quia uterque a terrenis uitiis temperabat, ille qui ita generatus est, ut nihil ten-eno deberet contagio, iste qui et in periculis fuerat adprobatus et examinatus in passionibus et repertus quod in confusione non fuisset obnoxius confusioni. altior autem sensus habet quod iustus magnitudine et multitudine uirtutis augetur atque doctrinae et replet terram quasi cor quoddam, in quo sit receptaculum intellegibilium. ita nihil uacuum sapientiae esse patitur, quod insipientia possit inuadere.
所以神將他立在一切屬地之物之上,正如祂立那照著神的形像被造的人一樣,因為二者都使自己脫離屬地的罪惡:一個是如此被生的,以致對屬地的污穢毫無虧欠;另一個則是在危難中蒙了稱許,在苦難中受了試驗,並被尋見在混亂中不至屈服於混亂。但更深的意義是:義人因德行與教訓的偉大和豐盛而得增長,並充滿地土,彷彿那地土是一顆心,其中可作為可悟之事的容器。如此他不容智慧有任何空虛之處,以致愚昧得以侵入。
And therefore God set him above all earthly things, just as he had set that one made to the image of God, because both kept themselves free from earthly vices: the one who was so begotten that he owed nothing to earthly defilement, the other who had been approved in dangers and tested in sufferings, and found to be one who in confusion had not been subject to confusion. But a deeper sense holds that the righteous man is increased by the greatness and multitude of virtue and of doctrine, and fills the earth as though it were a heart, in which there might be a receptacle of things intelligible. Thus he allows nothing to be empty of wisdom which folly might invade.
11:156
dominatur igitur terrenis omnibus passionibus, sed etiam sensibus corporalibus, bestias quoque sibi quodam terrore subigit et timore, m quibus species uidetur inesse malitiae atque feritatis. inmitis enim et agrestis est omnis malitia: inflatur aerio quodam tumore. nec illud obscurum quod reptilia quaedam letalium quandam habent speciem passionum, a quibus uenenum quoddam menti uidetur infundi.
因此他管理一切屬地的情慾,也管理身體的諸感官;他也藉著某種威嚇與懼怕使走獸服在自己之下——在那些走獸裡似乎住著惡毒與兇暴的樣式。因為一切惡毒都是兇猛而野蠻的:它被一種空虛的膨脹所充脹。也不難看出,某些爬物帶有致命情慾的某種樣式,似乎有某種毒液藉它們注入人的心思。
He therefore has dominion over all earthly passions, and likewise over the bodily senses; he subdues the beasts also to himself by a certain terror and fear—those beasts in which a likeness of malice and of savagery seems to dwell. For all malice is fierce and wild: it is puffed up with a kind of airy swelling. Nor is it obscure that certain creeping things have a certain semblance of deadly passions, by which a kind of venom seems to be poured into the mind.
11:157
omnibus ergo his imperat iustus, quibus non commiscetur, sed coercet ea, si mens eius non delectatione, non cupiditate ducatur, non tristitia et timore frangatur, non etiam luxuria atque deliciis tamquam lubricum et caducum uitae istius agat cursum, sed continentia ac temperantia ableget a se uir sapiens huiusmodi passiones. sed quia subdidit statim: omnia reptilia quae sunt uiua erunt uobis in escam, ne forte te moueat quia ante de reptilibus diximus uenenatis, cognosce alia esse reptilia uenenata, alia mansueta. de mansuetis igitur reptilibus<< accipe, quae etsi non omnia uentre et pectore repunt sicut colubres, exiguos tamen pedes habent, ut repere magis quam ambulare uideantur.
因此義人管理這一切,他不與它們相混,反倒制伏它們——只要他的心思既不被歡愉、也不被貪慾所牽引,既不被憂愁、也不被懼怕所壓垮,並且不像跑那滑溜易逝的路程般,藉奢華縱慾度此生,乃是智慧人藉著節制與節操,將這樣的情慾從自己驅逐出去。然而因為經上隨即加上:「一切活著的爬物都可作你們的食物」,恐怕你因我們先前說過有毒的爬物而困惑,要知道有些爬物是有毒的,有些是馴良的。論到馴良的爬物,當這樣領會:它們雖不都像蛇那樣用腹和胸爬行,卻有細小的腳,以致看起來是爬行多於行走。
Over all these, then, the righteous man rules; with them he does not mingle himself, but restrains them—if his mind is led neither by delight nor by desire, is broken neither by sadness nor by fear, and does not run the course of this life as something slippery and fleeting through luxury and indulgence, but the wise man, through continence and temperance, banishes such passions from himself. Yet because Scripture immediately added: 'all creeping things that are alive shall be food for you,' lest perhaps it disturb you that we earlier spoke of venomous creeping things, know that some creeping things are venomous, others tame. Of the tame creeping things, then, understand these: though they do not all creep upon belly and breast like serpents, yet they have tiny feet, so that they seem rather to creep than to walk.
11:158
ergo uenenatorum reptilium similes inmundas corporeas accipe passiones, mansuetorum autem decoras. omnis enim affectus, qui est praeter deformis delectationis inlecebram. passio quidem est, sed bona passio. cupiditas mollior et ira ac timor, haec noxiae animae passiones sunt, affectus autem innoxii passiones bonae sunt. et his uiuendi quidam nobis usus ministratur et causa, harum cibo utimur ad uitae gratiam, harum epulis delectamur. Quid est etiam quod ait: sicut holera pabuli dedi uobis omnia? in quo et hi qui simpliciter intellegunt, ut non expendant sermonis examen, non nobis uidentur esse contrarii.
因此你要把不潔的身體情慾看作像有毒的爬物,把合宜的情慾看作像馴良的。因為凡離了卑賤歡愉之引誘的情感,固然是情慾,卻是好的情慾。較柔的貪慾、忿怒與懼怕——這些是靈魂有害的情慾;而無害的情感則是好的情慾。藉著這些,某種生活的用途與根據供給了我們;我們用這些作食物,為著生命的恩典而享用;我們因這些的筵席而得喜樂。經上所說的「我把菜蔬作飼料賜給你們」,又是甚麼意思呢?在這話上,連那些單純領會、不去細究言語精意的人,也似乎並不與我們相反。
Therefore take the unclean bodily passions as like the venomous creeping things, but the seemly ones as like the tame. For every affection that is apart from the enticement of base delight is indeed a passion, but a good passion. Softer desire and anger and fear—these are harmful passions of the soul; but harmless affections are good passions. And by these a certain use and ground of living is supplied to us; with the food of these we make use for the grace of life, with the banquets of these we are delighted. What too is the meaning of what it says: 'as the green herbs of fodder I have given you all things'? In which even those who understand it simply, so as not to weigh the careful examination of the discourse, do not seem to be opposed to us.
11:159
sunt enim qui putant quod holera ad escam nobis dei iussu adtributa uideantur, quo his magis uti quam carnalibus epulis debeamus: ego autem libenter his adquiescerem, ut generi hominum ad parsimoniam magis et temperantiam holerum usus inolesceret, nisi uiderem ab his qui id non libenter accipiunt posse referri mihi quia non omnia holera escae hominum inueniantur adcommoda, deinde quia non omne hominum genus sapientiae et continentiae amore ducitur, ut continentiam sequi possit. et ideo quod generale praeceptum est, ad portiunculam paucorum hominum diriuare non possumus; omnibus enim hominibus hoc praeceptum datur. ideoque consideremus quid dixerit.
因為有人認為,菜蔬似乎是神藉命令分派給我們作食物的,好叫我們當用這些,而非肉類的筵席。我自己倒樂意贊同這些人,好使用菜蔬的習慣在人類中根深柢固,趨向更大的儉樸與節制——只是我看見,那些不甘願接受此說的人會反駁我說:並非一切菜蔬都適合人作食物;再者,並非每一種人都被愛慕智慧與節操所引導,以致能跟隨節操。因此,凡是普遍的訓誡,我們不能挪用到少數人的小小一份上;因為這訓誡是賜給眾人的。所以讓我們思想經上所說的。
For there are those who think that the herbs seem to have been assigned to us as food by God's command, in order that we ought to use these rather than fleshly banquets. I myself would gladly assent to these, so that the use of herbs might grow ingrained in the human race toward greater frugality and temperance—were it not that I saw it could be objected to me by those who do not gladly accept this, that not all herbs are found suited to the food of men; and again, that not every kind of man is led by love of wisdom and continence, so as to be able to follow continence. And therefore what is a general precept we cannot divert to the small portion of a few men; for this precept is given to all men. And so let us consider what it said.
11:160
sicut holera inquit pabuli dedi uobis omnia.. non holera omnia dedi uobis ad escam. utantur igitur qui utuntur carne tamquam holeribus non ad distentionem nec ad aruinam corporis, quam epulae carnis facere consuerunt.
經上說:「我把菜蔬作飼料賜給你們眾物。」它並沒有說:我把一切菜蔬賜給你們作食物。因此,凡吃肉的人,當把肉當作菜蔬來用——不是為著脹腹,也不是為著養肥身體,那正是肉食的筵席慣常所造成的。
'As the green herbs of fodder,' it says, 'I have given you all things.' It did not say: I have given you all the herbs for food. Let those, then, who eat flesh use it as if it were herbs—not for distension nor for the fattening of the body, which the banquets of flesh are wont to produce.
11:161
sed quemadmodum et holera non omnia ad escae usum habilia sunt, ita etiam non omne uiuum reptile adcommodum ad usum epulandi, siquidem ab omnibus uenenatis abstinere debemus, licet huc quoque processerit luxuria, ut magis delectationi consulat quam periculo et m plerisque resecto quod dicitur uenenatum naturaliter inesse reliquam partem ad cibum uindicet, quae etsi non plena periculi, tamen uicina periculo est et con\'uptela aliqua necesse est in totius sucum se carnis infuderit. plerique etiam sagittis uenenatis transfigunt ceruos et huiusmodi uelocia animalia et postea resecta quadam parte membrorum reliquo corpore ad cibum utuntur.
但正如並非一切菜蔬都適合作食物,照樣也並非每一種活的爬物都適合作筵席之用,因為我們當禁戒一切有毒之物——雖然奢華竟已發展到這地步,以致它顧念自己的歡愉過於危險,並且在多數情況下,把那據說天然有毒的部分割去,便將其餘的部分取來作食物;那部分雖未充滿危險,卻臨近危險,且必有某種污染滲入全身肉的汁液之中。許多人甚至用毒箭射穿鹿和這類迅捷的動物,事後割去肢體的某部分,便用其餘的身體作食物。
But just as not all herbs are fit for the use of food, so likewise not every living creeping thing is suited to the use of feasting, since we ought to abstain from all venomous things—although luxury has advanced even to this point, that it consults its own delight rather than its peril, and in most cases, the part that is said to be naturally venomous having been cut away, it claims the remaining part for food, which, though not full of peril, is yet near to peril, and some taint must of necessity have spread itself into the juice of the whole flesh. Many too transfix stags and such swift animals with venomous arrows, and afterward, a certain part of the limbs having been cut away, they use the rest of the body for food.
11:162
quod autem ad altiorem sensum pertinet, hoc est, unde magis dictum est, quod inrationabiles passiones ita debeant menti sapientis ut holera rustico esse subiecta, atque ita his utatur tamquam reptilibus cogitationibus, ut agricola holeribus, quae obesse non possunt, cibi tamen non habent gratiam fortioris. generale enim omnibus et commune praeceptum non altiora indicit genera uirtutum, quae utique paucorum sunt. sed etsi quis uirtutum epulas fortiores sibi exhibere non possit. huiusmodi tamen habeat passiones, quae non noceant. sed delectent.
但論到那關乎更深意義的——也就是這話所以被說出的主要緣由——乃是那些非理性的情慾,當如菜蔬之於農夫一般,順服在智慧人的心思之下,並且他當把它們當作爬行的思念來使用,正如農夫使用那不能造成損害、卻沒有更強壯食物之恩益的菜蔬。因為普遍而為眾人所共有的訓誡,並不命定那些更高的德行,那是少數人的事。但縱然一個人不能為自己預備德行那更強壯的筵席,他至少要有這樣的情慾,是不傷害、反倒使人喜樂的。
But as for what pertains to the deeper sense—that is, the chief reason it was said—it is that the irrational passions ought to be so subject to the mind of the wise man as herbs to the countryman, and that he should so use them as creeping thoughts, as the farmer uses herbs which cannot do harm, yet have not the grace of stronger food. For a precept general and common to all does not enjoin the higher kinds of virtues, which belong to a few. But even if a man cannot furnish himself with the stronger banquets of virtue, let him nevertheless have passions of this sort, which do not harm but delight.
11:163
Ideo in principio sanctus Moyses informauit nos atque instruxit de insufflatione animae, ut non laberemur opinionibus diuersis philosophorum, qui sibi ipsi constare non possunt. plerique enim uaria senserunt, uti Critias et eius discipuli sanguinem esse animam dicentes, istam utique animam, qua uiuimus, quae est sensibilis, non illam animam, quae rationabilis et intellegibilis interioris hominis aestimatur. Hippocrates autem etsi Critiae non inprobauit ingenium nec disputationem eius redarguit, tamen sententiae non adquieuit. Aristoteles endelechiam dixit, ignem alii esse uoluerunt.
因此在起初,聖摩西教導並指示我們關於靈魂被吹入之事,免得我們陷入眾哲學家紛紜的見解之中,他們連自己也不能彼此相合。因為許多人持各樣的看法,如克里提亞斯和他的門徒,說靈魂就是血——確是那叫我們活著、有感覺的魂,並非那被算為內裡之人之理性、可悟之魂。希波克拉底雖未否定克里提亞斯的才智,也未駁倒他的論辯,卻並不贊同這意見。亞里斯多德稱之為「圓極(隱德萊希)」,又有人要說它是火。
Therefore in the beginning holy Moses informed and instructed us concerning the inbreathing of the soul, lest we slip into the diverse opinions of the philosophers, who cannot agree even with themselves. For very many have held varied views, as Critias and his disciples, saying that the soul is blood—that soul, indeed, by which we live, which is sensible, not that soul which is reckoned to be the rational and intelligible soul of the inner man. Hippocrates, although he did not disapprove of Critias' talent nor refute his argument, yet did not assent to the opinion. Aristotle called it entelechy; others have wished it to be fire.
11:164
nos igitur huiusmodi diuisionem teneamus, ut separemus quod est rationabile animae, cuius substantia diuinus est spiritus, sicut ait scriptura: quia insufflauit in faciem eius spiritum uitae, esse autem in ea nutrimentum quoddam uitale, quo hoc corpus animatur, esse etiam delectabile. illarum igitur et uitalis et delectabilis animae partium substantia sanguis appellatur a quibusdam, licet etiam scriptura dixerit: anima totius carnis sanguis est. proprie igitur animam carnis sanguinem appellauit; in carne enim delectatio et passio est, non mens et ratiocinatio. tamen si diligenter intendas, hic locus illum explanat.
所以讓我們持守這分別:將靈魂裡屬理性的部分分別出來,其本質乃是神聖的靈——正如聖經所說:「因祂將生氣吹在他臉上」——又有在其中的某種生命的滋養,使這身體得以活著,並且還有一個取喜樂的部分。論到這些靈魂的部分,就是那有生命的和那喜樂的,有人稱其本質為血,雖然聖經也說過:「凡肉的魂就是牠的血」。因此確切地說,它稱血為肉的魂;因為在肉中有的是喜樂與情慾,而非心思與推理。然而你若仔細留意,這處經文就解明了那一處。
Let us therefore hold this distinction: that we separate out what is rational in the soul, whose substance is the divine spirit—as Scripture says, 'because he breathed into his face the breath of life'—and that there is in it a certain vital nourishment, by which this body is animated, and that there is also a part that takes delight. Of these soul-parts, then, the vital and the delightful, the substance is called blood by some, although Scripture too has said: 'the soul of all flesh is its blood.' Properly, then, it called the blood the soul of the flesh; for in the flesh there is delight and passion, not mind and reasoning. Yet if you attend carefully, this passage explains that one.
11:165
cum enim hoc loco dixerit sanguinem animam, utique significauit aliud esse animam. aliud sanguinem, ut sit animae substantia spiritus uitalis, sed ipsum spiritum uitalem non per se tantum et sine sanguine usum adferre uiuendi. sed commisceri sanguini, quia sunt quae appellantur arteriae uelut receptacula spiritus, quae non solum aerem purum amplectuntur, sed etiam sanguinem, sed minorem longe sanguinis portionem. gemina enim cum uasa sint, aliud uenae quae φλέΦ graece appellatur. aliud arteriae, uena plus habet sanguinis quam spiritus, hoc est φλέΦ , arteria minus sanguinis, multo amplius spiritus. iam temperatio pro diuersitate naturae est hominum singulorum.
因為當它在此處稱血為魂時,它確是表明:魂是一回事,血是另一回事——以致魂的本質乃是生命之氣,但那生命之氣單憑自己、沒有血,並不能供給活著的功用,乃是與血相混,因為有那稱為動脈的,彷彿是氣的容器,它們不僅含有純淨的空氣,也含有血——只是血的份量遠少得多。因為血管有兩種——一是靜脈,希臘文稱為 φλέψ,另一是動脈——靜脈裡的血多於氣,就是 φλέψ;動脈裡的血少,氣卻多得多。如今這調和乃是按著各人本性的差異而各有不同。
For when in this place it called blood the soul, it surely signified that the soul is one thing, blood another—so that the substance of the soul is the vital spirit, but that vital spirit by itself, without blood, does not afford the use of living, but is mingled with blood, since there are those things which are called arteries, as it were receptacles of spirit, which embrace not only pure air but also blood—yet by far a smaller portion of blood. For since the vessels are twofold—one the veins, which is called phleps in Greek, the other the arteries—the vein has more blood than spirit, that is, the phleps; the artery has less blood, far more spirit. Now the temperament varies according to the diversity of the nature of individual men.
11:166
altior autem sensus delectare te debet, qui significat sanguinem animam ideo dictum, quia sanguis calidus et ignitus est. sicut est uirtus. quicumque igitur studio fuerit uirtutis accensus et uaporem laudis adsumpserit, omnes delicias uentris excludit. ea igitur cogitationum quae sunt carnalia atque terrena in uirtutis. inquit, ardore positi reicietis quasi inhabilia spiritali cibo. non enim carnem manducabat, hoc est terrenum aliquid cogitabat qui dixit: meus cibus est ut faciam uoluntatem patris mei, qui in caelis est, studia hominibus uirtutis inspirans et cupiditatem diuinae cognitionis infundens.
但那更深的意義當使你喜樂,它表明血所以被稱為魂,乃因血是熱的、火般的——正如德行一樣。因此,凡被德行的熱心所點燃、又取了讚美之蒸氣的人,便將肚腹一切的歡愉摒除在外。那些屬肉體、屬地的思念,當你立在德行的火熱中時,你必棄絕它們,視之為不配作屬靈的食物。因為那說「我的食物就是遵行我在天上之父的旨意」的,並沒有吃肉——也就是沒有思想任何屬地之事——祂將德行的熱心吹入人心,並注入對認識神的渴慕。
But the deeper sense ought to delight you, which signifies that blood is therefore called the soul because blood is hot and fiery—as virtue is. Whoever, then, has been kindled with zeal for virtue and has taken up the vapor of praise, shuts out all the delights of the belly. Those thoughts, then, which are carnal and earthly, set as you are in the ardor of virtue, you will cast off as unfit for spiritual food. For he did not eat flesh—that is, he thought nothing earthly—who said: 'My food is to do the will of my Father who is in heaven,' breathing into men zeal for virtue and pouring in desire for the knowledge of God.
11:167
ergo terrenae cogitationes et infirmae quasi euiratae et sine usu sanguinis habentur, ut ille euiratus dicitur, qui sanguinis plurimum amiserit: etenim sanguinis effusione frigescit. quisque igitur diligens uirtutum est cibos ablegat et reicit corporales, nisi quantum scit satis esse naturae, quisque autem neglegentior tamquam lubricum et aquosum uitae istius fuerit cursum secutus quasi amissis uestigiis in uterum decidit et uentrem. itaque ea quae sunt terrena desiderat cibi caelestis alienus et qui non possit dicere: nostra autem conuersatio in caelis est. ideoque ut ad secretes nos prouocaret cibos, ait idem:
因此屬地而軟弱的思念,被算作彷彿被閹割、毫無血用的,正如那喪失大半血液的人被稱為閹割了的;因為血一流出,他便發冷。所以,凡殷勤追求德行的人,便摒棄並棄絕身體的食物,除非是他知道足夠本性所需的;但凡較為疏忽的人,跟隨了此生滑溜如水的路程,彷彿失了腳蹤,便墜入子宮與肚腹之中。如此,他作了天上食物的局外人,貪戀那屬地之事,是不能說「我們是天上的國民」的人。所以,為要召我們就那隱密的食物,那同一位又說:
Therefore earthly and feeble thoughts are reckoned as it were unmanned and without the use of blood, just as that man is called unmanned who has lost most of his blood; for by the effusion of blood he grows cold. Whoever, then, is diligent for virtue puts away and casts off bodily foods, except insofar as he knows is enough for nature; but whoever is more negligent, having followed the slippery and watery course of this life, as if his footsteps were lost, falls down into the womb and the belly. And so, a stranger to the heavenly food, he desires those things which are earthly, being one who cannot say: 'But our conversation is in heaven.' And therefore, to summon us to hidden foods, the same one says:
11:168
ne tetigeritis, ne adtaminaueritis, ne gustaueritis, quae sunt ad corruptelam ipso usu, secundum praecepta et doctrinas hominum; quae sunt rationem quidem habentia sapientiae in obseruationereligionis et humilitate cordis, non in indulgentia corporis, non in honore aliquo ad saturitatem et diligentiam carnis. Denique hunc sensum esse posteriora adprobant; sic enim ait: etenim uestrum sanguinem et animarum uestrarum exquiram de omnibus bestiis et de manu hominis\'. bestiali malitiae conparauit, immo etiam aceruauit iniquitatem hominis ultra bestiarum feritatem dicendo: de manu hominis fratris. etenim bestiae nihil nobiscum habent commune naturae, nullo uelut fraterno iure deuinctae sunt.
不可摸、不可碰、不可嘗那些憑其使用便趨向敗壞之物,這是照著人的吩咐和教訓——這些事在遵守宗教與內心謙卑上固有智慧之名,卻不在縱容身體,也不在任何榮耀以飽足、嬌養肉體。總之,隨後的話證明這正是其意;因為經上這樣說:「我必為你們的血,就是你們生命的血,向一切走獸並向人的手追討。」祂把人的惡毒比作走獸的惡毒——不,祂更藉著說「向人弟兄的手」,將人的罪孽堆積到超過走獸的兇暴之上。因為走獸與我們在本性上毫無相通,牠們並未被任何彷彿弟兄的權分所束縛。
Do not touch, do not handle, do not taste those things which by their very use tend to corruption, according to the precepts and doctrines of men—things which indeed have a show of wisdom in the observance of religion and in humility of heart, not in indulgence of the body, not in any honor unto the satisfying and pampering of the flesh. In short, the words that follow prove this to be the sense; for it says thus: 'For your blood and the blood of your souls I will require from all the beasts and from the hand of man.' He compared the wickedness of man to that of the beasts—nay, he even heaped up the iniquity of man beyond the savagery of beasts by saying: 'from the hand of a man's brother.' For beasts have nothing of nature in common with us; they are bound by no, as it were, fraternal right.
11:169
si nocent hominibus, quasi extraneis nocent, naturae iura non uiolant, germanitatis non obliuiscuntur affectum. ideo grauius homo peccat, qui fratri insidiatur, et ideo dominus seuerius uindicaturum se esse promisit dicens: sanguinem hominis de manu fratris eius exquiram. an non frater est quem rationabilis naturae quidam uterus effudit et eiusdem matris nobis generatio copulauit? eadem enim natura omnium mater est hominum, et ideo fratres sumus omnes una atque eadem matre generati cognationisque eodem iure deuincti.
牠們若傷害人,是當作外人傷害;牠們並不破壞本性的權利,不忘記親屬的情感。因此那暗算自己弟兄的人犯罪更重,所以主應許祂必更嚴厲地施行報應,說:「人的血,我必從他弟兄的手追討。」難道他不是弟兄麼——那由理性本性之某種子宮所生、又由同一母親的生育與我們聯結的人?因為一個並且同一的本性乃是眾人的母親,所以我們眾人都是弟兄,由一個並且同一的母親所生,又被同一親屬之權分所束縛。
If they harm men, they harm them as strangers; they do not violate the rights of nature, they do not forget the affection of kinship. Therefore man sins more grievously who lies in wait against his brother, and therefore the Lord promised that he would avenge it more severely, saying: 'The blood of a man I will require from the hand of his brother.' Or is he not a brother whom a certain womb of rational nature has brought forth, and whom the generation of the same mother has joined to us? For one and the same nature is the mother of all men, and therefore we are all brothers, begotten of one and the same mother and bound by the same right of kinship.
11:170
ideoque et dominus fratrem appellauit et eum fratrem, a quo sanguis fratris exquiritur, < qua re) significat magis ab his periculum pertimescendum qui fraterno sibi iure sociantur. hinc enim insidiae, hinc pericula frequentiora hominibus comparantur et ut speciale comprehendamus, quod fratribus specialibus in hereditatis diuisione frequenter odia succrescunt. deinde si fratri amplius collatum fuerit a parentibus, fratres alii indignantur magis et gratiam conlatam a parentibus parricidio auferre conantur. ista magis bella suspecta, bella non ciuitatum, sed singularum domorum. illos ergo dominus ad ultionis iudicium conprehendit, quos magis insidiaturos sibi esse cognouit.
因此主稱他為弟兄,連那要被追討弟兄之血的人,也稱為弟兄;藉此祂表明:當更懼怕那些憑弟兄之權與我們相連之人所帶來的危險。因為危害正是從這源頭而出,更頻繁的危難正是從這源頭為人預備的;舉個特例,在分家業時,仇恨常在親兄弟之間滋長。再者,若父母多賜給一個弟兄,其餘的弟兄就更加忿恨,竟想藉殺親之罪奪去父母所賜的恩寵。這些是更當提防的爭戰——不是城邦的爭戰,而是單個家庭內部的爭戰。因此主把那些祂知道更會暗算自己的人,歸入報應的審判之中。
And therefore the Lord called him a brother, even him from whom the blood of a brother is required; whereby he signifies that danger is rather to be feared from those who are joined to us by fraternal right. For from this source come the ambushes, from this source the more frequent perils are prepared for men; and, to take a particular instance, hatreds frequently grow up among particular brothers in the division of an inheritance. Then, if more has been conferred on one brother by the parents, the other brothers are the more indignant and try to take away by parricide the favor conferred by the parents. These are the wars more to be suspected—wars not of cities, but of single households. Those, therefore, the Lord includes in the judgment of vengeance, whom he knew would the more lie in wait against himself.
11:171
tertium est quod in eo fratrem dixit, non quo dignus pietatis nomine parricida sit, sed quo magis pietatis grauetur uocabulo atque inde fiat sceleris incrementum, quo iustior sit uindicta caelestis. ergo dominus deus noster ultionem promittit, ut uel sic frangatur metu qui pietatis est oblitus et sciat quod etiamsi homines effugiat homicida, dei tamen iudicium non possit euadere, sed maiori et aeterno supplicio reseruetur. altiore autem sensu hoc intellegimus, non solum ab extraneorum insidiis, uerum etiam a nostris, hoc est a domesticis nobis cogitationibus cauendum, deinde obseruandum nobis non solum a malitia mentis, uerum etiam ab ipsis sermonibus nostris. ideoque ait:
第三點是:祂在這一層意義上稱他為弟兄——並非說那殺親者配得虔敬之名,乃是要他因虔敬之稱呼而更受重壓,使罪行因此加增,叫天上的報應更顯為公義。所以主我們的神應許施行報應,好叫那忘了虔敬的人至少藉此因懼怕而被折服,並知道:兇手縱然逃脫了人,卻仍不能逃脫神的審判,反要被存留受更大而永遠的刑罰。但在更深的意義上,我們這樣領會:我們不僅要提防外人的暗算,也要提防自己內裡的——就是住在我們裡面的思念;其次,我們不僅要防備心思的惡毒,也要防備我們自己的言語。所以經上說:
The third point is that he called him a brother in this respect—not that the parricide is worthy of the name of piety, but that he may be the more burdened by the appellation of piety, and that thence may arise an increase of the crime, whereby the heavenly vengeance may be more just. Therefore the Lord our God promises vengeance, that at least in this way he who has forgotten piety may be broken by fear, and may know that even if the murderer escapes men, he yet cannot escape the judgment of God, but is reserved for a greater and eternal punishment. But in a deeper sense we understand this: that we must beware not only of the ambushes of strangers, but also of our own—that is, of the thoughts that dwell within us; and then that we must guard ourselves not only against the malice of the mind, but also against our very words. And therefore it says:
11:172
de multiloquio non effugies peccatum. ergo hoc significari uidetur, non solum operis nostri, sed etiam sermonis, qui est magis domesticus, rationem domino esse reddendam. et ideo diligentius considerandum, ne uel sermone uel opere contrahamus offensam, quia sicut ore confessio fit ad salutem, sic ore fit lapsus ad mortem. Qui effuderit inquit sanguinem hominis pro sanguine hominis eius effundetur.
「言語多,就難免有罪。」因此這話似乎表明:不僅我們的行為,連我們更為「家內」的言語,也都要向主交賬。所以更當殷勤思想,免得我們因言語或行為招致冒犯;因為正如口裡承認就得救,照樣口裡也能跌倒以致死亡。經上說:「凡流人血的,他的血也必為那人的血被流。」
'In much speaking you shall not escape sin.' Therefore this seems to be signified: that an account must be rendered to the Lord not only of our deed, but also of our speech, which is the more domestic. And therefore it must be considered the more diligently, lest by either word or deed we contract offense; for as with the mouth confession is made unto salvation, so with the mouth a fall is made unto death. 'Whoever sheds the blood of a man,' it says, 'for the blood of that man shall his own be shed.'
11:173
non errauit elocutio, sed enphasis facta uerborum est, eo quod is qui effuderit sanguinem hominis ipse quasi sanguis effundetur, quod spem ei posteritatis eripiat, quia sicut sanguis fusus in terram hac atque illac spargitur ita impiorum anima corporeae fragilitatis more soluatur, quia et de anima dictum est mortem eius esse corruptionem, eo quod gratiae caelestis munere defrudetur et uelut conlisa malitiae scopulis salubritatis suae corpus imminuat. mouet etiam plerosque quod dixerit: ad imaginem dei feci hominem et non dixerit: ad imaginem meam, cum ipse sit deus. sed intellege et patrem esse et filium esse.
這措辭並無差錯,乃是話語上有所強調,因為那流人血的,他自己也必如血般被流——這就是奪去他後裔的指望,因為正如澆在地上的血到處飛濺,照樣不敬虔者的魂也照身體脆弱的樣式而消散;因為論到魂也曾說過,牠的死就是敗壞,因牠被剝奪了天上恩典的恩賜,又彷彿撞在惡毒的礁石上,削減了自身康健的身體。又有許多人因祂說「我照神的形像造人」、而沒有說「照我自己的形像」而困惑,既然祂自己就是神。但你要明白:有父,也有子。
The expression did not err, but an emphasis of words was made, in that he who has shed the blood of a man shall himself be shed as it were like blood—which is to snatch from him the hope of posterity, because just as blood poured upon the earth is scattered here and there, so the soul of the impious is dissolved after the manner of bodily frailty; for it has been said also of the soul that its death is corruption, in that it is defrauded of the gift of heavenly grace, and, as it were dashed upon the rocks of malice, diminishes the body of its own soundness. It also troubles many that he said: 'To the image of God I made man,' and did not say: 'To my own image,' since he himself is God. But understand that there is both a Father and a Son.
11:174
et licet per filium omnia facta sunt, tamen legimus quia pater fecerit omnia et fecerit per filium, sicut scriptum est: omnia in sapientia fecisti. siue ergo pater dicit, ad imaginem uerbi fecit, siue filius dicit, ad imaginem dei patris fecit. et ideo familiarem quandam et domesticam deo demonstrat hominis esse naturam, id est rationabilis hominis, secundum quod ad imaginem dei creati sumus, eaque causa inultum non esse apud deum quod in domesticum sibi animal uideat crudeliter et inpie esse commissum.
雖然萬物都是藉著子造的,我們卻讀到父造了萬物,並且是藉著子造的,正如經上所記:「你以智慧造了萬物。」因此,無論是父說話,祂是照著「道」的形像造人;或是子說話,祂是照著父神的形像造人。所以祂表明:人的本性——就是理性之人的本性——對神而言乃是某種親近而屬家的本性,我們正是照此被造、合乎神的形像;因此緣故,當祂看見有人對與祂如此相親的受造之物行了殘忍不敬之事時,在神那裡這事斷不會無人報應。
And although all things were made through the Son, yet we read that the Father made all things, and made them through the Son, as it is written: 'You have made all things in wisdom.' Whether, then, the Father speaks, he made man to the image of the Word; or whether the Son speaks, he made man to the image of God the Father. And therefore he shows that the nature of man—that is, of rational man—is a certain familiar and household nature to God, according to which we were created to the image of God; and for this reason that it is not unavenged with God when he sees that against a creature so akin to himself something has been committed cruelly and impiously.
11:175
causa ergo addita uindictae facit, ut primum excludamus philosophorum quorundam opiniones, qui negant deum curam habere super homines, deinde scientes praerogatiuam nostrae ultionis apud deum manere neque in alios committamus quod diuino iudicio uindicandum sit neque ipsi mortem uehementius pertimescamus, cum sciamus necati hominis innocentis apud deum nullum esse contemptum. Non erit inquit diluuium, ut corrumpat omnem269 terram. dubium uidetur utrum enim non erit diluuium intellegendum sit \'quod diluuium corrumpat terram\' — hoc enim diluuia facere consueruntan uero (non erit tale diluuium, quo terra omnis corrumpatur\\ quod posteriora aperiunt, cum dicit omnem terram non corrumpendam;
那麼,為報應所加的緣由,便促成這事:我們首先排除某些哲學家的見解,他們否認神顧念世人;其次,既知道我們報應的特權乃存於神,我們就既不向別人行那當受神聖審判報應之事,自己也不過於激烈地懼怕死亡,因我們知道:在神那裡,被殺的無辜之人絕無被輕看的。經上說:「必不再有洪水毀壞全地。」這話似乎含糊:究竟「必不再有洪水」當理解為「不再有洪水毀壞這地」——因為這是洪水慣常所行的——抑或是「不再有那毀壞全地的這樣的洪水」,這由隨後的話得以明朗,因它說全地必不被毀壞;
The reason, then, added for the vengeance brings it about that we first exclude the opinions of certain philosophers, who deny that God has care over men; and next, knowing that the prerogative of our vengeance remains with God, that we neither commit against others what must be avenged by divine judgment, nor ourselves dread death too vehemently, since we know that with God there is no contempt for an innocent man who is slain. 'There shall not be,' it says, 'a flood to corrupt the whole earth.' It seems doubtful whether 'there shall not be a flood' is to be understood as 'that a flood corrupt the earth'—for this floods are wont to do—or rather 'there shall not be such a flood as may corrupt the whole earth,' which the following words make clear, when it says that the whole earth shall not be corrupted;
11:176
ostendit enim diluuia quidem esse futura, sed non talia quibus omnis possit terra corrumpi. sensus autem hoc altior habet, quod iam prouidentia futura sit domini, ne tantum sit diluuium corporalium passionum, ut anima omnis intereat. et quidem non audeo dicere quia uidetur dominus statuere quod nullius anima possit penitus interire. quid enim de parricida dicimus? quid etiam de homicida, quid de adultero, quid de praeuaricatore? quas ei partes animae ad ueniam reseruamus?
因為它表明:洪水確實還會有,卻不至於使全地能被毀壞。但更深的意義是這樣:主的眷顧已要為將來作工,免得身體情慾的洪水如此之大,以致全魂都歸於滅亡。實在說,我不敢說主似乎是斷定無人的魂能完全滅亡。因為論到殺親者,我們要怎麼說呢?論到兇手、論到姦淫者、論到悖逆者,又怎麼說呢?我們要為他們保留魂的哪些部分以得赦免呢?
for it shows that there will indeed be floods, but not such as that by them the whole earth could be corrupted. But the deeper sense holds this: that already the providence of the Lord will be at work for the future, lest there be so great a flood of bodily passions that the whole soul should perish. And indeed I do not dare to say that the Lord seems to determine that no one's soul can wholly perish. For what shall we say of the parricide? What too of the murderer, what of the adulterer, what of the transgressor? What parts of the soul do we reserve for them unto pardon?
11:177
unde magis illud arbitror quod prouocet dominus deus noster, ut etiamsi quis leuiores alias habeat passiones, non penitus diuinam desperet gratiam nec omnimodis uicturum se esse diffidat, sed etiamsi est luxuriosus nec potest studium uitare luxuriae, ab adulterio tamen studeat temperare, sit epulandi delectatio, non stuprandi sit. set etiamsi nescio qui auarus, qui aliena diripuit, eiecit pupillos, eliminauit uiduas, uel postea tamen in paenitentiam regressus restituat quod abstulit. denique Zacchaeus ideo ueniam meruit, quia non solum se restituturum, sed quadruplum promisit quibus aliqua sustulisset, pauperibus quoque medietatem sui patrimonii donaturum.
因此我倒判斷,這乃是主我們的神所激勵我們的:縱然有人有別樣較輕的情慾,他也不該全然絕望於神的恩典,也不該全然不信自己必能得勝;縱然他放縱於奢華、不能避開對奢華的追求,他至少當努力禁戒姦淫——讓喜樂在於宴飲,而非在於淫亂。又縱然有某個我不知是誰的貪財之人,搶奪了別人的財物,趕逐孤兒,逼走寡婦,他日後仍可回轉悔改,歸還他所奪去的。總之,撒該所以蒙赦免,乃因他不僅應許要償還,更要四倍償還凡他訛詐了的人,並要把家業的一半也分給窮人。
Whence I rather judge this to be what the Lord our God provokes us to: that even if anyone has other, lighter passions, he should not utterly despair of the divine grace, nor distrust altogether that he will conquer; but even if he is given to luxury and cannot avoid the pursuit of luxury, let him nevertheless strive to refrain from adultery—let there be delight in feasting, not in debauchery. And even if there is, I know not who, some covetous man who has plundered the goods of others, cast out orphans, driven out widows, let him yet afterward, returning to repentance, restore what he took away. In short, Zacchaeus therefore merited pardon, because he promised not only that he would restore, but fourfold, to those from whom he had taken anything, and would give half of his patrimony also to the poor.
11:178
Consideremus etiam diligentius quid sit quod ait: arcum meum ponam in nube, et erit signum testamenti aeterni inter me et terram. et erit cum innubilauero nubes super terram, parebit arcus meus in nube, et memor ero testamenti mei. non enim sicut plerique arbitrantur, arcum istum dicit quem aiunt homines esse, quo pluuiarum signa aliqua declarentur, in quo colores diuersi tamquam radiorum solis nunc rutilantium, nunc lumine clariore lucentium figurantur, unde et pluuia futura significatur, eo quod inconstantia quaedam serenitatis uersicolora illa specie demonstretur. arcum hunc irim quidam appellant, sed absit ut hunc arcum dei esse dicamus;
讓我們也更殷勤地思想,經上所說的是甚麼意思:「我把虹放在雲彩中,這就作我與地之間永約的記號。我使雲彩遮蓋地的時候,我的虹必現在雲彩中,我便記念我的約。」因為它並非如大多數人所想,是說那人們所謂的虹——藉它顯出某些下雨的徵兆,其中現出種種顏色,彷彿日光的光線,時而閃耀火紅,時而以更亮的光輝照耀,由此預示將來的雨,因那繽紛多彩的樣式顯出晴天的某種不穩定。這虹有人稱為「彩虹(iris)」;但我們斷不可說這就是神的虹。
Let us also consider more diligently what is meant by what it says: 'I will set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be a sign of the eternal covenant between me and the earth. And it shall be, when I cover the earth with a cloud, my bow shall appear in the cloud, and I will remember my covenant.' For it does not, as most suppose, speak of that bow which men say there is, by which certain signs of rains are declared, in which diverse colors are figured as it were of the sun's rays, now glowing red, now shining with brighter light, whence the coming rain is signified, in that a certain inconstancy of fair weather is shown by that many-colored appearance. This bow some call the iris; but far be it that we should call this the bow of God.
11:179
hic enim arcus, qui iris dicitur, per diem uideri solet, nocte non apparet. etiam per ipsum diem, si obductus aer taetris nubibus fuerit, ne sic quidem uidetur, ni forte cum grauiores nubes se coeperint relaxare. ergo uideamus ne, quia arcus, quo sagittae iaciuntur, nunc tenditur, nunc resoluitur, quandam extensionem et remissionem uideatur scriptura significare, per quam neque penitus per nimiam extensionem uniuersa rumpantur, sed sit quaedam mensura et quoddam diuinae uirtutis examen.
因為這稱為彩虹的虹,慣常是白晝得見,夜間卻不顯現。即便在白晝,若空中被陰沉的雲遮蔽,連這樣也看不見,除非或許是在那較濃的雲開始疏散之時。因此讓我們察看:是否因那射箭的弓時而拉緊、時而鬆弛,聖經乃是要表明某種張與弛——藉此,萬物既不至因過度的張力而全然斷裂,反倒有某種尺度、某種神聖權能的權衡。
For this bow, which is called the rainbow, is wont to be seen by day, but does not appear by night. Even during the day itself, if the air is overcast with foul clouds, not even thus is it seen, unless perhaps when the heavier clouds have begun to slacken. Therefore let us see whether—because the bow with which arrows are shot is now drawn taut, now loosened—Scripture may not seem to signify a certain stretching and slackening, through which neither are all things utterly broken by excessive stretching, but there is a certain measure and a certain examination of the divine power.
11:180
est ergo uirtus inuisibilis dei, quae et specie istius arcus extendendi et remittendi moderatur pro diuina uoluntate misericordia potestate, quae neque omnia confundi nimia solutione neque disrumpi nimia inruptione patiatur. quam ideo in nubibus dicit poni, quia tunc maxime opus est diuinae auxilio prouidentiae, quando agmina nubium in procellas tempestatesque coguntur. ideoque dicit: arcum meum ponam in nube, non \'sagittam ponam\'. arcus enim instrumentum iaculandae sagittae est; itaque non ipse arcus uulnerat, sed sagitta. et ideo dominus in nubibus arcum magis quam sagittam ponit, id est non illud quod uulneret, sed quod habeat terroris indicium, uulneris effectum habere non soleat.
因此,有神不可見的能力,在這張弛之弓的表象之下,按著神的旨意、憐憫與權能施行治理,以致它既不容萬物因過度的鬆弛而混亂,也不容因過度的崩裂而被撕裂。祂說這弓放在雲彩中,緣故乃在於:正當雲塊被驅聚成風暴與暴雨之時,最是需要神聖眷顧的幫助。所以祂說:「我把虹放在雲彩中」,而非「我要放一支箭」。因為弓是射箭的器具;如此傷人的並非弓本身,乃是箭。所以主在雲彩中所放的是弓而非箭——也就是說,不是那傷人的,乃是那帶著威嚇之表記、卻慣常不致造成傷害之果效的。
There is, therefore, an invisible power of God, which, under the figure of this bow that is stretched and slackened, governs by divine will, mercy, and power, so that it allows neither all things to be confounded by excessive loosening, nor to be torn apart by excessive bursting. He says it is set in the clouds for this reason, because then above all there is need of the help of divine providence, when the masses of clouds are driven together into storms and tempests. And therefore he says: 'I will set my bow in the cloud,' not 'I will set an arrow.' For the bow is the instrument for hurling the arrow; and so it is not the bow itself that wounds, but the arrow. And therefore the Lord sets in the clouds the bow rather than the arrow—that is, not that which wounds, but that which has the token of terror, while it is not wont to have the effect of a wound.
11:181
Qua ratione autem cum supra tres filios Noe conputauerit, Sem Cham Iaphet, hoc loco unius conprehenderit medii filii generationemhoc est quod ait: Cham autem erat pater Chanaan; isti erant tres filii Noeet maxime cum illi duo iusti, iste iniustus medius? iniusti ergo prius generatio quam iustorum conprehenditur. neque enim possumus negare quod scriptum est, sed ad coaceruandum delictum ipsius addita eius est generatio, quod, cum haberet filium et pater esset, solus ipse patrem non cognouit, qui magis cognoscere debuisset. et ideo meruit improbum habere filium, quia improbus fuerat patri.
但是有何緣故,當祂在上文數點挪亞的三個兒子——閃、含、雅弗——時,在此處卻只包括了中間那兒子的後裔——也就是經上所說:「含是迦南的父親;這是挪亞的三個兒子」——尤其那兩個是義的,這中間的卻是不義的?如此,不義者的後裔反倒先於義者被列出。因為我們不能否認所記的,乃是他的後裔被加上,是為要堆積他自己的過犯,因為他雖有兒子、自己也作父親,唯獨他不認自己的父親,而他本是更當認他的。因此他配得有個邪惡的兒子,因他曾向自己的父親行了惡。
But on what ground, when above he had counted three sons of Noah—Shem, Ham, Japheth—does he in this place include the generation of only the middle son—that is, what it says: 'And Ham was the father of Canaan; these were the three sons of Noah'—and especially since those two were righteous, but this middle one unrighteous? The generation of the unrighteous one, then, is included before that of the righteous. For we cannot deny what is written, but his generation was added to heap up his own offense, because, although he had a son and was himself a father, he alone did not acknowledge his own father, who ought the more to have acknowledged him. And therefore he deserved to have a wicked son, because he had been wicked toward his father.
11:182
simul significat ex illo Chanaan Chananaeos fuisse, qui post multas generationes oppressi a populo iusto cesserunt in eius possessionem. auctorem ergo Chananaeorum Chanaan fuisse manifestum est, qui fuit filius huius Cham, qui impius in patrem extitit. altior autem sensus nominum interpretatione signatur. Cham enim \'calor\' est, Chanaan \'turbatio eorum\'. qui enim calet continuo mouetur et perturbatur, ideoque euidentissime declaratur non tam hominem patrem hominum fuisse, sed passionem malam improbae passionis generatricem, quae esset a patris moribus, hoc est ab usu uirtutis aliena. Et coepit Noe homo agricola esse terrae.
同時這也表明,那迦南就是迦南人的源頭,他們經過許多世代後,被義的子民所勝,便讓出地土歸入他們為業。如此,迦南是迦南人的始祖,這是顯明的——他是這含的兒子,而這含向自己的父親顯出不敬虔。但更深的意義由眾名字的解釋而被標明。因為「含」意即「熱」,「迦南」意即「他們的攪擾」。因為凡發熱的人立刻就被攪動、被擾亂;因此最明顯地宣告:他與其說是人類肉身的父親,不如說是一種惡情慾,是邪惡情慾的生育者,與父親的品性相異——也就是與德行的操練相異。「挪亞作起農夫來,耕種土地。」
At the same time it signifies that from that Canaan came the Canaanites, who after many generations, being overcome by the righteous people, gave way into their possession. That Canaan, then, was the author of the Canaanites is manifest—he who was the son of this Ham, who showed himself impious toward his father. But the deeper sense is marked by the interpretation of the names. For Ham means 'heat,' Canaan 'their disturbance.' For whoever grows hot is straightway moved and perturbed; and therefore it is most evidently declared that he was not so much a human father of human beings, but an evil passion, the begetter of a wicked passion, which was alien to the father's character—that is, alien to the practice of virtue. 'And Noah, a man, began to be a husbandman of the earth.'
11:183
uidetur271 quidem prima specie Adae illi, qui de terra factus est, comparari Noe uir iustus, quia et de illo scriptum est quod e paradiso eiectus coeperit operari terram, de isto quoque quoniam egressus ex arca factus sit agricola. et propemodum in utroque praecesserat quaedam forma diluuii, quia et Noe post diluuium et Adam post mundi constitutionem secundum figmentum corporis. nam ut mundus fieret, congregata est aqua in unam congregationem, ut uideretur terra, quae ante non poterat per aquarum confusionem uideri. ergo sicut ille primigenes magister terram uidetur operatus, ita etiam egressus ex arca Noe seminationis et culturae auctor est factus. haec putantur similia:
乍看之下,義人挪亞確似乎可與那從地受造的亞當相比,因為論到那一位也記著說,他被趕出樂園後便開始耕地;論到這一位同樣記著,他出方舟後便作了農夫。在二者身上,都彷彿先有了洪水的某種預表,因為挪亞是在洪水之後,亞當則是在世界按身體之摶成被立定之後。因為要使世界得以形成,水便聚成一處,好叫旱地顯露,那旱地先前因眾水的混亂而不能顯露。因此,正如那頭生的師傅被看為耕作了土地,照樣挪亞出了方舟後,也作了播種與耕種的創始者。這些被認為是相似的:
At first sight, indeed, Noah the righteous man seems to be compared to that Adam who was made from the earth, because of that one too it is written that, being cast out of paradise, he began to till the earth, and of this one likewise, that, having gone out from the ark, he became a husbandman. And in both there had, as it were, gone before a certain figure of the flood, because both Noah was after the flood, and Adam after the constitution of the world according to the molding of the body. For that the world might come to be, the water was gathered into one gathering, that the earth might appear, which before could not appear because of the confusion of the waters. Therefore, just as that first-born master is seen to have worked the earth, so too Noah, having gone out from the ark, was made the author of sowing and cultivation. These are thought to be similar:
11:184
sed si uerba consideres, quae iam uim sensus altioris exprimunt, aliud est operatorem terrae esse, aliud agricolam; alius enim tamquam mercennarii, alius tamquam patris familias loco fungitur. denique Cain, qui fratrem occidit, erat operarius terrae. et ut scias quod operari terram magis seruile quam liberum sit, maledicto parricidalis eius operatio conprehenditur. denique scriptum est: quoniam operaberis terram et non augebit uirtutem suam dare tibi. gemens et tremens eris super terram.
但你若細看那如今表達更深意義之力的話語,作土地的「工人」是一回事,作「農夫」是另一回事;因為前者彷彿行雇工的職分,後者則彷彿行一家之主的職分。總之,那殺了弟兄的該隱,乃是土地的工人。為叫你知道耕地比起自由更近於奴役,他的耕作被歸在那殺親者的咒詛之下。因為總之經上記著:「你既耕種土地,地必不再給你效力;你必流離飄蕩在地上。」
But if you consider the words, which now express the force of a deeper sense, it is one thing to be a worker of the earth, another to be a husbandman; for the one performs the office as it were of a hireling, the other as it were of a head of a household. In short, Cain, who killed his brother, was a worker of the earth. And that you may know that to work the earth is more servile than free, his working is comprised under the curse of the parricide. For in short it is written: 'Because you shall work the earth, and it shall not increase its strength to give to you; groaning and trembling shall you be upon the earth.'
11:185
terra autem caro nostra est, quam improbus operatur, bonus autem excolit, ille quasi mercedem quaerat e terra, iste quasi bonae fructus capiat et gratiam disciplinae, ut magis fructiferum agrum faciat suum et qui domini possit respondere culturis et indulgentiam cultoris ostendat operator autem quid aliud nisi escam tantummodo corporis sui quaerit, uentris magis usu studens atque id solum explicare contentus, quod sibi prodesse possit ad uictum? ille uero alius fructuum utilitate pascitur. quos fructus habeat iustus agnoscitis. fructus autem spiritus caritas gaudium pax patientia bonitas.
但這地土乃是我們的肉體,惡人耕作它,善人卻栽培它:前者彷彿向地求工價,後者彷彿領受果子和管教的恩典,好叫他使自己的田更為多結果子,又能回應其主人的耕種,並顯出耕者的厚待。但那單作工的人,所求的豈不過是自己身體的食物麼?他寧可專注於肚腹之用,滿足於只成就那一件惟能使他得糊口之益的事。但那另一個人,卻是因果子的益處得餵養。義人有甚麼果子,你們是認得的:「聖靈的果子就是仁愛、喜樂、和平、忍耐、良善。」
But the earth is our flesh, which the wicked man works but the good man cultivates: the one as though seeking a wage from the earth, the other as though receiving the fruits and the grace of discipline, so that he may make his field the more fruitful, and one able to answer to the cultivations of its lord and to show the indulgence of its tiller. But what else does the mere worker seek than only the food of his own body, being intent rather on the use of the belly and content to accomplish that one thing only which can profit him toward sustenance? But that other man is fed by the usefulness of the fruits. What fruits the righteous man has, you recognize: 'But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, goodness.'
11:186
bonus ergo agricola habet continentiam, castitatem, ut si quae arbores cito curuantur in terram et effusius germinant, eas uelut quadam temperantiae suae falce. succidat, ut abiciant quod infirmum est, germinent quod decorum. Quid est quod iustus primum uineam plantat et non aut triticum aut hordeum? unde autem uinea post diluuium corruptionemque terrae? sed de hoc et supra diximus quia ueris tempore etiam corruptarum radices uitium pullulare potuerunt. unde illud maiore sollicitudine soluendum arbitror, quia iustus prius quae uoluptaria quam quae necessaria sunt requirit.
因此好農夫具有節制與貞潔,以致若有甚麼樹木迅速向地彎垂、過於茂盛地發芽,他便彷彿用其節制的修枝鉤,將它們剪回,好叫它們棄掉軟弱的,發出合宜的。義人先栽葡萄樹、而非小麥或大麥,是甚麼緣故?洪水與地的敗壞之後,葡萄樹又從何而來?但這事我們上文也已說過,就是在春天的時候,連敗壞了的葡萄樹的根也能發芽。因此我想那另一點當更加謹慎地加以解明:就是義人先尋求那屬享樂的事,過於那必需的事。
The good husbandman, therefore, has continence, chastity, so that if any trees are quickly bent toward the earth and germinate too profusely, he may, as it were with the pruning-hook of his temperance, cut them back, so that they may cast off what is weak and germinate what is seemly. What is the reason that the righteous man first plants a vine, and not either wheat or barley? And whence comes a vine after the flood and the corruption of the earth? But of this we have spoken above also, that in the time of spring the roots even of corrupted vines could sprout. Whence I think that other point is to be resolved with greater care: that the righteous man seeks first the things that are of pleasure rather than those that are necessary.
11:187
necessarii enim fructus sunt tritici et hordei, sine quibus non possumus uiuere, uinum autem uoluptarium, causa delectationis datum. quod, quia iustus est, ideo magis sibi, hoc est quod secundum erat quam quod primum est, uindicauit. necessaria enim alimenta uiuendi deo detulit, quod erat ..... superfluum autem uinum hominibus et non necessarium. sed fortasse dicas ita sine potu non posse homines uiuere, quemadmodum etiam sine cibo. necessarius ergo est potus sicut cibus? non abnuo. siti utique necessarius a domino constitutus est? non repugno.
因為必需的果子是小麥和大麥的果子,沒有它們我們就不能存活;但酒乃是享樂之物,是為著喜樂而賜的。又因為他是義的,所以他更為自己取了那次要的,過於那首要的。因為他把生活所必需的養料獻給了神,那是……但酒對人而言是多餘的、非必需的。但或許你要說:人沒有飲料就不能活,正如沒有食物一樣。那麼飲料豈不像食物一樣是必需的麼?我並不否認。它豈不確是主為解渴而定為必需的麼?我並不反駁。
For the necessary fruits are those of wheat and barley, without which we cannot live; but wine is a thing of pleasure, given for the sake of delight. And because he is righteous, he therefore claimed for himself the more that which was secondary rather than that which was primary. For he offered to God the necessary nourishments of living, which was... but wine is superfluous to men and not necessary. But perhaps you may say that without drink men can no more live than even without food. Is drink, then, necessary like food? I do not deny it. Was it surely appointed by the Lord as necessary for thirst? I do not contest it.
11:188
et ideo ad potum necessarium fontes et flumina conuenit deriuare, quae non utique manu hominis effecta, sed domini dei nostri iussu et operatione fluxerunt. ac ne quia diximus operationem domini, ad illud retorqueas, quod operatio Cain uidetur maledictiones habuisse, considera non operationem maledicti nomen accipere, sed quia scriptum est operari terram. qui enim operatur terram mercennarius est; ille autem non mercennarius, sed dominus qui ait: pater meus usque modo operatur. et ego operor. quid operatur huius modi operator audi: meus cibus est, ut faciam uoluntatem patris mei, qui in caelis est. Et bibit inquit de uino et inebriatus est. non dixit:
因此,為必需的飲料,便宜於引流泉源和江河,那確不是人手所造的,乃是照著主我們的神的命令與作為而流出的。又免得你因我們說了主的作為,便把它扭回那一點——說該隱的作為似乎帶有咒詛——你要思想:受咒詛之名的並非那作為本身,乃是經上所記「耕種土地」這事。因為耕種土地的乃是雇工;但那一位不是雇工,乃是主,祂說:「我父作事直到如今,我也作事。」你要聽這樣的作工者作甚麼工:「我的食物就是遵行我在天上之父的旨意。」經上說:「他喝了那酒,便醉了。」它並沒有說:
And therefore for necessary drink it was fitting to divert springs and rivers, which were certainly not made by the hand of man, but flowed by the command and operation of the Lord our God. And lest, because we have spoken of the operation of the Lord, you twist it back to that point—that the operation of Cain seems to have had curses—consider that it is not the operation that receives the name of the curse, but the fact that it is written 'to work the earth.' For he who works the earth is a hireling; but that one is not a hireling, but a lord, who says: 'My Father works until now, and I work.' Hear what such a worker works: 'My food is to do the will of my Father, who is in heaven.' 'And he drank,' it says, 'of the wine and was made drunk.' It did not say:
11:189
uinum bibit, neque iustus uinum ebibit, sed de uino, hoc est de eius portione libauit. ebriosi est omne obsorbere uinum et intemperantis euacuare quod sumpserit, continenti autem utendum mensura legitima est. ebrietatis itaque species gemina est, una quae titubationem corpori afferat atque eius supplantet uestigia sensumque perturbet, altera quae mentem uirtutis uaporet gratia, et omnem infirmitatem uideatur auertere. unde apostolus ait: uino modico utere propter frequentes tuas infirmita.tes.
「他喝了酒」,也沒有說「義人把酒喝盡」,乃是說「喝了那酒中的」——也就是他嘗了其中的一份。把酒一飲而盡乃是醉漢的記號,把所取的傾盡乃是無節制之人的記號;但有節制的人必須按合法的量來用它。如此,醉有兩種:一種使身體蹣跚,絆住其腳步,攪亂其感官;另一種則以德行的恩典溫暖心思,似乎驅除一切的軟弱。因此使徒說:「因你屢次患病,可以稍微用點酒。」
'He drank wine,' nor 'the righteous man drank up the wine,' but 'of the wine'—that is, he took a taste of a portion of it. It is the mark of a drunkard to swallow up all the wine, and of an intemperate man to empty out what he has taken; but the temperate man must use it by a lawful measure. And so there is a twofold kind of drunkenness: one which brings staggering to the body and trips up its footsteps and disturbs the senses; the other which warms the mind with the grace of virtue, and seems to turn away every weakness. Whence the apostle says: 'Use a little wine because of your frequent infirmities.'
11:190
sicut enim isto bibendi moderamine uinum non infirmitati est, sed saluti atque omnem infirmitatem ableuat corporis, ita etiam ebrietas illa praeclara omnem infirmitatem carnis excludit, de qua scriptum est: et poculum inebrians quam praeclarum. quae sit ista ebrietas? inebriamini inquit non uino, in quo est luxuria, sed implemini spiritu, sicut apostolus dixit. et secundum litteram igitur cautio est et secundum altiorem sapientis sensum laudatio est. cautus est qui, etsi nudatur, in domo tamen nudatur sua, ubi operimenta non desint et quaedam tegmina ebrietatis, ut uitia sua norit abscondere.
因為正如藉著這飲酒的節制,酒不致使人軟弱,反使人康健,並解除身體一切的衰弱,照樣那美好的醉也驅除肉體一切的衰弱——論到這醉,經上記著說:「你使人沉醉的杯,是何等美!」這醉是甚麼呢?經上說:「不要醉酒,酒能使人放蕩,乃要被聖靈充滿」,正如使徒所說。如此,按字面說,這是一個警戒;按智慧人更深的意義說,這是一個讚美。那謹慎的人,縱然赤身露體,也是在自己家中露體,那裡不缺遮蓋,並有醉的某些遮掩,使他懂得遮藏自己的過失。
For just as by this moderation in drinking wine is not unto weakness but unto health, and relieves every infirmity of the body, so too that excellent drunkenness shuts out every infirmity of the flesh—of which it is written: 'And your cup that makes drunk, how excellent it is.' What is this drunkenness? 'Be drunk,' it says, 'not with wine, in which is luxury, but be filled with the Spirit,' as the apostle said. According to the letter, then, it is a warning, and according to the deeper sense of the wise man, it is a praise. He is on his guard who, even if he is uncovered, is yet uncovered in his own house, where coverings are not lacking and certain veilings of drunkenness, so that he may know how to hide his own faults.
11:191
corporalia igitur nudum corpus tegunt ut parietes et tecta, animae autem quae sint operimenta uideamus. sed tunc operimenta repperimus, si enudationem eius discusserimus. gemina autem est nudatio sapientis. gemino igitur amictu mens nostra uestitur, si aut peccatum imprudens admiserithaec est enim nudatio uelut ebriae mentis, ut nesciat quod delinquat, quasi quae temulentia quadam ignorantiae in uitium deducta labaturaut rursus neglegentiae et ignorantiae somno sepulta errorem suum nesciat.
那麼,身體的遮蓋物覆蓋赤裸的身體,正如牆壁與屋頂;但讓我們思想靈魂的遮蓋物是什麼。然而,唯有當我們察看靈魂的赤裸時,才能尋見這些遮蓋物。智者的赤裸有兩種。因此,我們的心思也披著雙重的衣袍:或是當它在不知不覺中犯了罪——這便是那如同醉酒之心的赤裸,使它不知道自己所犯的過錯,彷彿被某種無知的醉態引入罪中而跌倒;或者,當它被疏忽與無知的睡眠所埋葬,竟不曉得自己的迷誤。
Bodily coverings, then, clothe the naked body, as do walls and roofs; but let us consider what the coverings of the soul may be. We shall discover these coverings, however, only if we examine its nakedness. Now the nakedness of the wise man is twofold. Our mind, therefore, is clothed in a twofold garment: either when it has unknowingly admitted a sin — for this is the nakedness, as it were, of a drunken mind, that it does not know what it is doing wrong, as one who, led into vice by a certain inebriation of ignorance, slips and falls — or, again, when, buried in the sleep of negligence and ignorance, it is unaware of its own error.
11:192
quae cum inciderimus, immo\'cum peccata plura inciderimus etiam per scientiamest enim naturalis quaedam etiam nostrae infirmitatis ebrietas, ut impetu delectationis feramur in uitium, sicut plerique iuuenali accensi calore aut luxuria et delectatione flammati aut auaritiae rapti cupiditate —, certe omnibus his medicina quaeratur, ut aliquis tegat huiusmodi infirmitatem suam primum pudore quodam et uerecundia, ut etiamsi in lubrico sit adhuc positus delinquendi, det tamen emendationis insigne. etenim plurimum interest utrum peccata sua iactare desideret; in altero enim turpis inpudentia, in altero tolerabilis uerecundia spem futurae correctionis ostendit.
當我們陷入這些罪中——不,更確切地說,當我們甚至明知故犯地陷入諸多罪中(因為連我們自身的軟弱也有某種天然的醉態,使我們因享樂的衝動被帶入罪惡,正如許多人被青春的熱情點燃,或被奢華與逸樂所燃起,或被貪婪的慾望所擄掠)——對這一切都當尋求醫治,使人首先以某種羞恥與謙遜遮蓋自己這樣的軟弱,這樣即使他仍站在犯罪的滑地上,也仍能顯出悔改的記號。因為一個人是想誇耀自己的罪,還是想遮掩它,這其中有極大的分別:前者是可恥的厚顏,後者是可容忍的謙遜,顯出將來改正的盼望。
And when we have fallen into these — nay rather, when we have fallen into many sins even knowingly (for there is a certain natural inebriation of our own weakness, whereby we are carried into vice by the impulse of pleasure, as very many are kindled by youthful heat, or inflamed by luxury and delight, or seized by the greed of avarice) — assuredly let a remedy be sought for all these, that one should cover such weakness of his, first by a certain shame and modesty, so that, even though he be still placed on the slippery ground of wrongdoing, he may yet give a sign of amendment. For it makes a very great difference whether a man wishes to boast of his sins or to conceal them: in the one there is shameful impudence, in the other a tolerable modesty shows hope of future correction.
11:193
alia est autem denudatio animae, qua uelut quandam sarcinam corporis abicit atque exsuit sicut sepulchrum quoddam carnis effugiens. sepulchrum enim patens est guttur huiusmodi hominum, in quo sepulchro uelut adtumulatur anima delectationibus et cupiditatum passionibus onerata diuersis. exsuit igitur se a congestione terrena et quasi retia quaedam circumfusa euadit atque effudit quaecumque se ab omni nudauerit laqueo passionum et omnem illam deformem speciem terrenae labis auerterit, ut lucem uideat decoris aeterni. : Quaero nunc cur non simpliciter dixent: \'uidit Cham nudationem patris\', sed: uidit Cham pater Chanaan? utique Chanaan natus non erat.
但靈魂還有另一種赤露,藉此它脫去並卸下身體這彷彿的重擔,如同逃離肉體的某座墳墓。因為這樣之人的喉嚨是敞開的墳墓,靈魂在這墳墓中彷彿被埋葬,被享樂與種種慾望的情慾所重壓。因此,靈魂從屬地的堆積中脫離自己,逃出並傾倒出那彷彿圍繞它的羅網——這靈魂已從情慾的一切網羅中脫去自己,並轉離屬地污穢一切醜陋的形象,好叫它得見永恆華美的光。我如今要問:為何聖經不單說「含看見他父親的赤身」,卻說「迦南的父親含看見」?因為迦南那時尚未出生。
But there is another stripping bare of the soul, by which it casts off and puts away the burden, as it were, of the body, fleeing as from a certain tomb of the flesh. For the throat of such men is an open sepulchre, in which sepulchre the soul is, as it were, entombed, laden with delights and with the diverse passions of its lusts. It strips itself, therefore, from the earthly heaping-up, and escapes and pours out from the nets, as it were, that are spread about it — that soul which has stripped itself of every snare of the passions and turned away every foul appearance of earthly defilement, that it may behold the light of eternal beauty. I now ask why Scripture did not simply say, 'Ham saw the nakedness of his father,' but said, 'Ham, the father of Canaan, saw.' For surely Canaan had not yet been born.
11:194
cur ergo nomen addidit fili nisi ut et uitio auctoris deformaretur hereditas et auctor fili nequitia grauaretur? et pater igitur in filio et in patre filius redarguuntur habentes stultitiae, nequitiae, impietatis quoque commune consortium. nec poterat fieri ut bonum generaret filium qui ipse bono patri nequam filius et naturae et eruditionis degener extitisset. haec secundum litteram. quod autem ad altiorem sensum pertinet, omnes mores pessimi erroribus delectantur alienis, nec solum erroribus, sed etiam iis quae ipsis uideantur mala esse, etiamsi non sint. nudum enim se Noe non sentiebat, qui amictu erat indutus sapientiae.
那麼,為何要加上兒子的名字,豈不是為叫產業因始作俑者的惡而受玷污,而始作俑者也因兒子的邪惡而加重罪責嗎?於是父親在兒子身上、兒子在父親身上都被定罪,在愚妄、邪惡並不敬虔上共有一份。一個本身對好父親作不肖之子、在本性與教養上都墮落變質的人,斷不能生出好兒子。這是按字面的意思。至於關乎更高層的意義:一切最卑劣的品性都以別人的過失為樂——不僅以過失為樂,甚至以那些在他們看來是惡、其實並非惡的事為樂。因為挪亞並不覺得自己赤身,因他已披上智慧的衣袍。
Why then did it add the name of the son, except that the inheritance might be disfigured by the vice of its author, and the author be burdened by the wickedness of his son? And so both the father in the son and the son in the father are convicted, having a common partnership in folly, wickedness, and impiety as well. Nor could it come to pass that he should beget a good son who had himself stood forth as a worthless son to a good father, degenerate both in nature and in upbringing. This much according to the letter. But as for what pertains to the higher sense: all the basest of characters take delight in the errors of others — and not only in errors, but even in those things which seem to them to be evil, although they are not. For Noah did not perceive himself to be naked, since he was clothed in the garment of wisdom.
11:195
denique nec Adam in paradiso positus nudum se putabat nisi posteaquam praeuaricationis commisit errorem. et redopertus amictu sapientiae ac iustitiae mandatorumque caelestium praeuaricatione nudatus (se> nudum uidit et foliis operiendum putauit. ridet igitur Cham nudatum patrem cernens. omnis namque improbus, quoniam ipse deuius disciplinae est, aliorum lapsus274 non solum pro sui erroris solacio accipit, quod consortes inuenerit culpae, uerum etiam improbo laetatur affectu, tamquam sua ipse delicta correxerit.
再者,亞當被安置在樂園中,也並不以為自己赤身,直到他犯了違命的過錯。他原被智慧、公義與天上誡命的衣袍所覆蓋,及至因違命而被剝得赤露,便看見自己赤身,以為當用葉子遮蓋。所以含看見父親赤露便發笑。因為凡作惡的人,既然自己偏離了規矩,便不僅把別人的跌倒當作自己過錯的慰藉——就是慶幸找到了同夥——甚至帶著邪惡的心情歡喜,彷彿自己藉此就改正了自己的過犯。
Finally, neither did Adam, placed in paradise, think himself naked, except after he had committed the error of transgression. And being covered over with the garment of wisdom and righteousness and of the heavenly commandments, when stripped bare by transgression he saw himself naked and thought he must be covered with leaves. Ham, then, laughs when he sees his father stripped bare. For every wicked man, since he is himself astray from discipline, takes the lapses of others not only as a solace for his own error — namely, that he has found partners in fault — but even rejoices with a wicked affection, as though he himself had thereby corrected his own offenses.
11:196
mala mens ergo laetatur praeter propositum aliquid accidisse sapienti, cum utique corporis lapsus in uitio esse non debeat, etiamsi lapsus putetur, nisi animus quoque inclinet in culpam. postremo ueniabilia huiusmodi iudicentur errata, non odio persequenda, non habenda ludibrio, sed mens, ut dixi, improba, cum putat errasse sapientem, insultandum arbitratur ei cuius sibi putat mores esse contrarios, quod peccatum suum uelut tacito quodam sapientis testimonio redarguatur, eoque laetandum sibi, quod iusto uiro nec eruditio ipsius profuerit nec iustitia suffragata sit nec ea quae secundum corpus sunt habuerint prosperos cursus.
所以邪惡的心思因智者遭遇了違背其本意的事而歡喜,雖然身體的失足實在不該算為罪——縱然被當作失足——除非心思也偏向了過錯。總之,這類的過失當被判為可饒恕的,不該以憎恨追究,不該被當作笑柄;但正如我所說,邪惡的心思以為智者犯了錯時,便認定當羞辱他,認定那人的品行與自己相反,因為它自己的罪被智者那彷彿無言的見證所責備;它也以此為樂——就是那義人連自己的學問也無益於他,他的公義也無濟於事,那些屬乎身體的事也未得亨通。
An evil mind, therefore, rejoices that something has befallen the wise man contrary to his purpose, although surely a lapse of the body ought not to be reckoned a vice, even if it be thought a lapse, unless the mind also inclines toward fault. In short, let errors of this kind be judged pardonable, not to be pursued with hatred, not to be held up to mockery; but an evil mind, as I have said, when it thinks the wise man has erred, judges that he must be insulted, the one whose character it deems contrary to its own, because its own sin is reproved by a certain silent testimony, as it were, of the wise man; and it rejoices in this — that to the righteous man neither his own learning has profited, nor his righteousness availed, nor have the things which pertain to the body had prosperous courses.
11:197
haec enim pro summis bonis apud improbos aestimantur in diuitiis aut honore posita, quae tamen nullum fructum ad laudem uirtutis conferunt. propterea insipientiae defensores uidentur <qui> uirtutis amatorem prosperorum munere esse fraudatum, qui omne bonum temporalibus magis quam perpetuis aestimandum putant. Quid est quod Sem et lapheth uestimentum imposuerunt supra umeros suos et perrexerunt retrorsum et operuerunt nudum patrem et non uiderunt nudationem eius? littera euidentem pietatis expressit affectum, quod nudatum amictu patrem boni filii uidere cauerunt, ne paterna reuerentia uel ipso minueretur aspectu, siquidem etiam tacito uultu pietas frequenter offenditur.
因為在惡人看來,這些事——當它們在於財富或尊榮時——被視為至高的善,然而它們對德行的稱讚卻毫無果效可言。所以愚妄的辯護者似乎為德行的愛慕者被剝奪了亨通的恩賜而悲嘆——他們以為一切的善都當以暫時之物、而非永恆之物來衡量。這話是什麼意思:閃與雅弗把衣服搭在肩上,倒退著進去遮蓋父親的赤身,並沒有看見他的赤身?字面顯出敬虔之愛的明證,就是好兒子謹慎不去看父親被剝去衣袍的樣子,免得對父親當有的敬重連藉著目睹也受減損,因為敬虔常常連無言的面容也會冒犯。
For these things are esteemed by the wicked as the highest goods, when they consist in riches or honour, which nevertheless confer no fruit toward the praise of virtue. Therefore the defenders of folly seem to grieve that the lover of virtue has been cheated of the gift of prosperity — they who think that every good is to be measured by temporal rather than by eternal things. What is the meaning of this, that Shem and Japheth laid a garment upon their shoulders and went backward and covered their naked father and did not see his nakedness? The letter has expressed a manifest affection of piety, in that the good sons took care not to see their father stripped of his garment, lest the reverence due to a father should be lessened even by the mere sight, since indeed piety is often offended even by a silent countenance.
11:198
unde etiam Romae uetus fuisse usus dicitur, ne filii cum parentibus et maxime puberes intrarent lauacrum. sensus autem altior hoc habet, quia insipiens praesentia tantummodo uidet, quae in oculis sunt, futura non respicit, praeterita non cogitat, sapiens autem et praeterita recordatur et futura considerat omnis ergo mens sapiens retrorsum ambulat, hoc eat praeterita spectat nec naturae quodam usu impeditur: nihil uacuum, nihil nudum suorum patitur esse gestorum. operit quae aliter gesta sunt amictu quodam et gratia uel praesentis operis uel futuri, ut nihil indecorum praetereat, nihil inornatum relinquat.
由此據說羅馬甚至有一古老的習俗:兒子不該與父母同入浴室,尤其是當他們已成年之後。但更高的意義是這樣:愚人只看見眼前之事,就是眼前的事物;他不顧念將來,不思想過去;惟有智者既追念過去,又顧念將來。因此凡有智慧的心思都倒退而行——就是察看過去,且不被本性的某種慣常方式所攔阻:它不容自己的任何作為成為空虛,成為赤裸。凡曾以別樣方式行的,它便用某種衣袍與恩典加以遮蓋,或是用現今的、或是用將來的工作,好叫它不放過任何不體面之事,不留下任何未經修飾之物。
Whence it is said that there was even an ancient custom at Rome, that sons should not enter the bath with their parents, and especially when they had reached manhood. But the higher sense is this: that the foolish man sees only present things, those that are before his eyes; he does not look to the future, he does not consider the past; but the wise man both recalls the past and considers the future. Every wise mind, therefore, walks backward — that is, it looks upon the past and is not hindered by any habitual usage of nature: it suffers nothing of its own deeds to be empty, nothing to be naked. It covers whatever has been done otherwise with a certain garment and grace, whether of present or of future work, so that it may pass over nothing unseemly and leave nothing unadorned.
11:199
unde et apostolus superiora obliuiscebatur, priora appetebat, sed obliuiscebatur, ut absconderet persecutionis errores, ut tegeret superiora delicta bonisque operibus obumbraret. beati enim et illi quorum tecta peccata sunt, id est si tegantur bonis factis et operiantur uirtutum sequentibus disciplinis. Et sobrius inquit factus est Noe a uino. manifestum est ex ebrietate intercedente somno sobrios fieri homines, mens autem sobria est, quando et praeterita et futura cognoscit. sobria ergo erat mens iusti et quando ebria putabatur; est enim praeclarum poculum inebrians iustos. ille autem uere inebriatus erat qui ridebat patrem.
由此使徒也忘記背後的事,努力面前的事;但他忘記,是為要遮藏他逼迫時的迷途,為要掩蓋他從前的過犯,並以善行遮蔽它們。因為那些罪得遮蓋的人實在也是有福的——就是說,若他們的罪被善行遮蓋,並被隨後而來的德行操練所掩藏。經上說:「挪亞酒醒了。」顯然人是藉著睡眠介入而從醉酒中醒過來;但心思清醒,是當它既認識過去又認識將來之時。所以那義人的心思即使被人以為醉了,仍是清醒的;因為有一杯榮耀的酒使義人沉醉。然而那真正醉了的,乃是那譏笑父親的人。
Whence also the Apostle forgot the things that were behind and reached forth to the things that were before; but he forgot, that he might hide the wanderings of his persecution, that he might cover his former offenses and overshadow them with good works. For blessed indeed are they too whose sins are covered — that is, if they be covered with good deeds and concealed by the disciplines of virtue that follow. 'And Noah,' it says, 'became sober from the wine.' It is plain that men become sober from drunkenness with the intervention of sleep; but the mind is sober when it knows both the past and the future. Sober, therefore, was the mind of the righteous man even when he was thought to be drunk; for there is a glorious cup that makes the righteous drunk. But he was truly drunk who laughed at his father.
11:200
quia enim neque praeteritam generationis gratiam neque praesentem reuerentiam patris neque futuram poenam paternae iniuriae considerabat, uere ebrius erat et quod putabat uidere se non uidebat. erat in illo profunda caecitas qui patrem uidere non poterat. nam si uidisset patrem, non utique risisset; neque enim ridendus, sed uerendus est pater. multo autem amplius mentem iusti insipiens uidere non poterat. quomodo enim uidebat qui in eo putabat ebrietatis errorem, ubi erat perfectus sapientiae ceterarumque uirtutum uapor? sicut scriptum est: uapor eat enim uirtutis dei.
因為他既不顧念他被生養所領受的往昔恩惠,也不顧念對父親當有的現今敬重,也不顧念因羞辱父親將來的刑罰,他便真是醉了,他以為看見的卻並未看見。他裡面有深沉的瞎眼,以致他看不見自己的父親。因為他若看見了父親,斷不會發笑;父親不是該被譏笑的,乃是該被敬畏的。但愚人更是遠不能看見義人的心思。因為他既以為義人裡面有醉酒的迷誤,而那裡其實有智慧並其餘諸德完全的薰香,他又怎能看見呢?正如經上所記:「這乃是神大能的氣息。」
For because he considered neither the past grace of his begetting, nor the present reverence due his father, nor the future punishment of the injury done to his father, he was truly drunk, and what he thought he saw he did not see. There was in him a profound blindness, in that he could not see his father. For if he had seen his father, he would assuredly not have laughed; for a father is not to be laughed at, but to be reverenced. But far more was the foolish man unable to see the mind of the righteous. For how could he see, who supposed there to be in him the error of drunkenness, where there was the perfected exhalation of wisdom and of the other virtues? As it is written: 'For it is the breath of the power of God.'
11:201
quando enim mens magis sobria est quam tunc, quando naturam omnium rerum temporumque praesentium et futurorum ita spectat negotia, ut nulla in eo temporalis titubantia ebrietatis appareat? \' quaero etiam qua ratione, cum ante medium dixerit inter filios Cham, nunc iuniorem constituat. sic enim scriptum est: cognouit Noe omnia quae fecit ei filius iunior. numquid ante scriptura in ordine generationis en-auit? non utique. quid ergo? contraria nunc scripta sunt? non arbitror. quomodo igitur soluitur, nisi iuniorem non aetate, non tempore accipias, sed rudem sensus et in quadam intellectus infantia constitutum, qui doctrinam prouectioris aetatis non hauserit nec perceperit senile consilium?
因為心思何時比這時更清醒呢——就是當它如此默想萬物的本性、並現今與將來諸時代的事務,以致裡面毫無醉酒那暫時的搖晃顯現出來之時?我也要問,這是為何緣故:經上先前把含列在眾子之中,如今卻立他為幼子。因為經上這樣記著:「挪亞知道他幼子向他所作的一切事。」聖經先前在世系的次序上說謊了嗎?斷然沒有。那麼怎樣呢?如今所記的是相反的事嗎?我想不是。那麼這要如何解開呢?除非你把「幼子」不按年歲、不按時間來領會,乃是領會為悟性粗陋、處於某種智識嬰孩之境的人——就是那未曾汲取較長年歲之教導、也未領受年長者智謀的人。
For when is the mind more sober than then, when it so contemplates the nature of all things and the affairs of times present and to come, that no temporal tottering of drunkenness appears in it? I ask also for what reason, when before it had set Ham in the middle among the sons, it now makes him the younger. For thus it is written: 'Noah knew all that his younger son had done to him.' Did Scripture before lie in the order of the generation? Surely not. What then? Are contrary things now written? I think not. How then is it resolved, unless you take 'younger' not by age, not by time, but as rude in understanding and set in a certain infancy of intellect — one who has not drawn in the teaching of a more advanced age nor grasped the counsel of the aged?
11:202
cani enim quidam sunt sensus hominum. et ideo inquit: quom ueneris ad seniorum concilium, claude os tuum, ut habet alibi sententia: discendum enim tibi prius est quam loquendum. aures ergo paratas habe, ut aliquid de sapientium consiliis consequaris. lingua reprimenda est, auditio praeparanda. Benedicens filium suum Sem ait Noe: benedictus dominus deus Sem. et erit Chanaan seruus eius. et dominum et deum dixit et specialiter deum filii sui, cui nomen est Sem, eo quod deus iustorum, hoc est deus mentium, non uallium, qui gratiam habeant uirtutis excelsae. deinde qua ratione, cum filius eius Cham peccauerit, non ipsum, sed filium eius seruituti addixit?
因為人的悟性自有某種白髮。所以經上說:「你到長老的議會時,要閉口。」正如別處另一句格言所言:「你必須先學而後言。」所以要預備好你的耳朵,使你能從智者的籌議中有所獲得。舌頭當受約束,聽聞當有預備。挪亞為兒子閃祝福說:「閃的主神是應當稱頌的,迦南要作他的奴僕。」他既稱閃為主,又稱為神,且特別稱為他兒子閃的神,因他是義人的神——就是心思的神,不是低谷的神——是那些擁有崇高德行之恩的人的神。其次,為何緣故,當他的兒子含犯了罪,他卻不將他、而是將他的兒子判作奴役呢?
For there are certain grey hairs of men's understanding. And therefore it says: 'When you come to the council of elders, close your mouth,' as another saying has it elsewhere: 'For you must learn before you speak.' Have your ears ready, therefore, that you may gain something from the counsels of the wise. The tongue is to be restrained, the hearing to be prepared. Blessing his son Shem, Noah said: 'Blessed be the Lord God of Shem, and let Canaan be his servant.' He called him both Lord and God, and especially the God of his son, whose name is Shem, because he is the God of the righteous — that is, the God of minds, not of valleys — who possess the grace of exalted virtue. Then, for what reason, when his son Ham had sinned, did he consign not him, but his son, to servitude?
11:203
et fortasse ideo quod plus afficitur pater iniuriis filii sui, maxime quarum ipse reus et auctor exsistat, et uehementius contristatur sui peccati dam- nationem a filio persolutam, qui non tam suo quam patris merito puniretur: deinde quia, cum doctrinae paternae discipulus esset filius et pessimarum aemulus cogitationum, uno corpore uterque uteretur et mente eademque malitia. indifferenter igitur uel paternae uel suae malitiae filius pretium luit, quoniam improbitatis commune consortium est. quod igitur pro patris soluit improbitate sine dubio et pro sua soluit culpae eius reus uel certe diutius poena producitur, cum etiam ad filium usque pertendit et successoris afflictio in tempora.
或許是為此緣故:父親更深地被兒子所加的羞辱所傷,尤其那些他自己作了罪人與始作俑者的羞辱,並且更劇烈地憂傷,因他自己罪的定罰竟由一個兒子來償付,而這兒子受罰並非因自己的應得,倒多是因父親的緣故;其次,因為這兒子既是父親教訓的門徒、又是最惡念頭的效法者,二人便共用一個身體、同一心思、同樣的邪惡。所以兒子無分彼此地償付父親的、或自己的邪惡之代價,因為在惡上有共同的一份。因此他為父親的惡所償付的,無疑也是為自己所償付,他既擔負父親過錯的罪責;或至少刑罰被拖延得更久,因它甚至延及兒子,且後嗣的苦楚伸入後世。
And perhaps for this reason: that a father is more affected by the injuries of his son, especially those of which he himself stands as the guilty party and author, and is more vehemently grieved that the condemnation of his own sin has been paid by a son who was punished not so much by his own desert as by his father's; and then, because, since the son was a disciple of his father's teaching and an emulator of the worst thoughts, both used one body and the same mind and the same malice. Indifferently, therefore, the son pays the price either of his father's malice or of his own, since there is a common partnership in wickedness. What therefore he pays for his father's wickedness he doubtless also pays for his own, being guilty of his father's fault; or at any rate the penalty is prolonged the longer, when it extends even to the son and the affliction of the successor reaches into later times.
11:204
multa profertur. hoc secundum litteram. ceterum non tam hic homines quam mores conprehenduntur, quorum in utroque una natura. nam Cham \'calor\' Chanaan \'conmotio* et \'inquietudo\'. qui autem calidus est utique inquietus atque conmotior est. in duobus igitur erat una passio et unus affectus. itaque cum alter addicitur, uterque damnantur. cur sanctus igitur Noe benedicens filium suum Iapheth ait: dilatet dominus Iapheth et habitet in domibus Sem et fiat Chanaan seruus eius? diximus supra Iapheth quasi indifferens bonum significari. indifferentia autem latitudinem habet, quae est in salute uigore decore fortitudine diuitiis gratia nobilitate amicis potestatibus et ceteris.
所論甚多。這是按字面的。至於其餘,這裡所包含的與其說是人,不如說是品性,在二者裡都有一個本性。因為含意為「熱」,迦南意為「騷動」與「不安」。凡是熱的,必然是不安且更躁動的。所以在這二人裡只有一種情慾、一種心性。因此當一人被定罪時,二人都被定罪。那麼為何聖潔的挪亞為兒子雅弗祝福說:「願主使雅弗擴張,使他住在閃的帳棚裡,又使迦南作他的奴僕」?我們在上文已說,雅弗象徵一種彷彿是中性的善。但中性有其廣闊,乃在於健康、活力、美貌、力量、財富、恩寵、高貴、朋友、權勢及其餘。
Much is set forth. This according to the letter. For the rest, it is not so much men as characters that are comprehended here, of which in both there is one nature. For Ham means 'heat,' Canaan means 'commotion' and 'unrest.' And he who is hot is assuredly unquiet and more agitated. In the two, therefore, there was one passion and one disposition. And so, when the one is condemned, both are condemned. Why then does holy Noah, blessing his son Japheth, say: 'May the Lord enlarge Japheth, and may he dwell in the houses of Shem, and may Canaan be his servant'? We have said above that Japheth signifies a good that is, as it were, indifferent. But indifference has a breadth, which lies in health, vigour, beauty, strength, riches, favour, nobility, friends, powers, and the rest.
11:205
sed haec licet indifferentia bona sint, tamen plerisque nocuerunt, qui ea non cum sapientia et iustitia possederunt. multos enim ebrios fecere diuitiae, nobilitas et potestas superbos, pulchritudo luxuriosos, cuius suffragio alienae mentis corruperint castitatem. ergo pro utentis affectu horum quae diximus indifferentia est, quorum usus aut uirtutibus regitur aut certe sine gubernatione uirtutum fraudi esse incipiunt quae possunt esse utilitati. Nuac quoniam post diluuium Noe dicitur uixisse trecentis et quinquaginta annis nequaquam praetereundum putamus. nam in trecentis crucem Christi significari certum est, cuius typo iustus a diluuio liberatus est.
但這些中性之物雖然是善的,卻曾損害了極多沒有以智慧和公義來持有它們的人。因為財富使許多人沉醉,高貴與權勢使人驕傲,美貌使人放蕩,藉其助力他們敗壞了別人心思的貞潔。所以我們所提這些事的中性,乃在於使用者的心性,其使用或受諸德掌管,或在沒有諸德掌管時,那些本能有益的事便開始變為有害。如今,既說挪亞在洪水之後又活了三百五十年,我們斷不以為這可以略過。因為確定的是:三百代表基督的十字架,義人藉著其預表得從洪水中蒙拯救。
But although these indifferent things are good, yet they have harmed very many who possessed them without wisdom and righteousness. For riches have made many men drunken, nobility and power have made them proud, beauty has made them lustful, by whose support they have corrupted the chastity of another's mind. Therefore the indifference of these things which we have named is according to the disposition of him who uses them, whose use is either governed by virtues, or else, without the governance of virtues, those things which can be for advantage begin to be for harm. Now, since Noah is said to have lived three hundred and fifty years after the flood, we by no means think this is to be passed over. For it is certain that in the three hundred the cross of Christ is signified, by whose figure the righteous man was delivered from the flood.
11:206
in quinquaginta iubelaeus est numerus remissionis, quo spiritus sanctus missus a caelo est gratiam humanis pectoribus infundens. perfecto igitur numero remissionis et gratiae iustus curriculum uitae huius impleuit. de generatione inquit lapheth: Rodus et aliae insulae nationum sunt. non inmerito latitudo dicitur, quando etiam in alteram partem naturae, hoc est maritima generatio eius processit. uere enim tamquam latitudo non fuit eo contenta, quod in usum hominibus natura praescripserat, hoc est terrae possessione, uerum etiam introgressa est mare, ad insulas usque processit. hoc secundum litteram.
五十乃是禧年,是赦免的數目,在這數目中,聖靈從天上差來,將恩典澆灌入人心。所以當赦免與恩典的數目滿足之時,那義人就走完了今生的路程。論到雅弗的世系,經上說:「羅得島與列國其餘的海島都是他的。」他被稱為廣闊並非沒有緣故,因他的世系甚至延伸入本性的另一部分,就是海洋的部分。因為他確實如同廣闊,不以本性為人類所用而規定的——就是地土的產業——為滿足,倒進入了海洋,遠達眾海島。這是按字面的。
In the fifty is the jubilee, the number of remission, in which the Holy Spirit was sent from heaven, pouring grace into human hearts. The number of remission and grace being completed, therefore, the righteous man fulfilled the course of this life. Of the generation of Japheth it says: 'Rhodes and the other islands of the nations are his.' Not without reason is he called breadth, since his generation extended even into the other part of nature, that is, the maritime part. For truly, like breadth, he was not content with that which nature had prescribed for the use of men, that is, the possession of the land, but he even entered the sea and advanced as far as the islands. This according to the letter.
11:207
secundum altiorem autem sensum, eo quod ea quae extra sunt, quae dicuntur bona, diuitiae potestates honores, quasi diffunduntur latius nec tantum his contenti sunt diuites quae in manibus et in conspectu sunt, sed longe lateque diffundunt suas cupiditates, dum aut pecuniarum conpendium de ulterioribus quaeritur aut honor a pluribus aut potestas diffusior aut cupiditas. Nunc quaero qua ratione Cham illiua improbi filium Chum seniorem scriptura fuisse memorauit? duo genera terrae, unum uelut harenosum et puluerulentum, immo ut expressius dicam puluis, aliud genus terrae fructiferum atque fecundum, hoc est terra solidior et profunda.
但按更高的意義,這是因為那些外在的、被稱為善的事物——財富、權勢、尊榮——彷彿散布得更廣,富人不僅以手中眼前的事物為滿足,倒把他們的慾望散布到遠近各處,或是從更遠的地方謀求錢財的利益,或是從更多的人謀求尊榮,或謀求更廣的權勢,或謀求私慾。如今我要問,聖經為何緣故記載古實是那惡人含的長子?地有兩類:一類彷彿是沙土且滿是塵埃——更確切地說,就是塵土;另一類地則是結實纍纍且肥沃的,就是更堅實深厚的地。
But according to the higher sense, it is because those things which are external, which are called goods — riches, powers, honours — are, as it were, diffused more widely, and the rich are not content only with those things which are in their hands and before their eyes, but spread their desires far and wide, while either a profit of moneys is sought from regions beyond, or honour from a greater number, or a more diffuse power, or lust. Now I ask for what reason Scripture has recorded that Cush was the elder son of that wicked Ham. There are two kinds of earth: one as it were sandy and dusty — nay, to speak more expressly, dust; the other kind of earth fruitful and fertile, that is, earth more solid and deep.
11:208
quid igitur improbus nisi puluerem generat, ex quo generatio esse non possit? ideoque propheta puluerem impiis conparauit dicens: non sic impii, non sic, sed tamquam puluis, quem proicit uentus a facie terra.e, eo quod etiam secundum altiorem sensum infecunda sit impiorum anima,, quae fructus utiles generare non possit. qua ratione etiam Chus Nembroth gigantem generat, qui erat uenator ante deum? unde dictum est: sicut Nembroth gigans uenator ante deum. quid aliud igitur puluis et harena generaret nisi terrenum hominem, eo quod impius caelestibus terrena praeponat. gigantes enim fabula inducuntur aduersum superna pugnare uoluisse et terreno ascensu ascendendum ad caelestia putauerunt.
那麼惡人除了塵土還能生出什麼,而塵土又怎能有所生養呢?所以先知將不敬虔的人比作塵土說:「惡人並不是這樣,並不是這樣,乃像風所吹散、離開地面的糠秕。」因為按更高的意義,不敬虔之人的靈魂也是不結實的,不能生出有益的果子。古實又為何緣故生出巨人寧錄,就是在神面前作獵戶的呢?由此說:「像寧錄在神面前作英勇的獵戶。」那麼塵土與沙除了生出屬地的人還能生出什麼呢?因不敬虔的人把屬地的事置於屬天之上。因為神話中說那些巨人想要與上天爭戰,以為當藉著屬地的攀登而升到屬天的事物。
What then does the wicked man beget but dust, from which there can be no generation? And so the prophet compared the ungodly to dust, saying: 'Not so the ungodly, not so; but they are like the dust which the wind drives from the face of the earth,' because also according to the higher sense the soul of the ungodly is barren, being unable to generate useful fruits. For what reason does Cush also beget the giant Nimrod, who was a hunter before God? Whence it is said: 'Like Nimrod the mighty hunter before God.' What else, then, would dust and sand beget but an earthly man, since the ungodly puts earthly things before heavenly? For giants are introduced by the fable as having wished to fight against the things above, and they thought they must ascend to heavenly things by an earthly ascent.
11:209
altiore autem sensu illud significatur, quod qui terrenas diligit uoluptates et eas sequitur et putat his se posse ad dei gratiam peruenire et regnum caeleste huiusmodi erroribus deferendum, is aduersum caelestia contumaci proeliatur affectu. propterea in prouerbio est de eo qui deliquerit: \'sicut Nembroth gigans uenator ante deum\'. Nembroth autem per interpretationem Aethiops dicitur. color Aethiopis tenebras animae squaloremque significat, qui aduersus lumini est, claritatis exsors, tenebris inuolutus, nocti similior quam diei. uenatoris quoque ustis in siluis, inter feras ac bestias conuersatio eius.
但在更高的意義上,這所表示的是:凡愛慕屬地的逸樂、追隨它們、並以為藉著這些便能達到神的恩典、又以為當藉這類迷誤而達到屬天國度的人,這人便以悖逆的心性與屬天的事物爭戰。所以論到那將要犯罪之人,有句箴言說:「像寧錄在神面前作英勇的獵戶。」寧錄按其字義譯作「衣索比亞人」。衣索比亞人的膚色表明靈魂的黑暗與污穢,這黑暗與光相反,毫無光亮,被黑暗所裹,更像黑夜而非白晝。並且像獵戶慣於山林,他的生活方式乃是在野獸與牲畜之間。
But in the higher sense this is signified: that he who loves earthly pleasures and follows them and thinks that by these he can attain to the grace of God and that the heavenly kingdom is to be reached by errors of this kind, this man wars against heavenly things with a defiant disposition. Therefore it is in a proverb concerning him who shall have offended: 'Like Nimrod the mighty hunter before God.' But Nimrod by interpretation is called 'Ethiopian.' The colour of the Ethiopian signifies the darkness and squalor of the soul, which is contrary to the light, devoid of brightness, wrapped in darkness, liker to night than to day. Of a hunter, too, accustomed to the woods, his manner of life is among wild beasts and brutes.
11:210
inrationabilis ergo miscetur inrationabilibus passionibus et ea quae sunt malitiae agrestis atque praedurae uenator huiusmodi explorare consueuit atque his potiri atque delectari. denique Nembroth huius principium regni Babylon, hoc est \'confusio\' eo quod malitia et potestas non in simplicitate et puritate, non in distinctione uirtutis, sed in confusione uitiorum est.
所以那無理性的人與無理性的情慾相混雜,這樣的獵戶慣於探尋、佔有並喜愛那些屬於粗野且極其頑硬之邪惡的事物。末了,寧錄國度的起頭是巴別,就是「混亂」,因為邪惡與權勢不在於單純與純潔,不在於德行的分別,乃在於諸惡的混亂中。
The irrational man, therefore, mingles with irrational passions, and a hunter of this kind is wont to track out, and to gain possession of, and to delight in, those things which belong to a rustic and very hard malice. Finally, the beginning of Nimrod's kingdom was Babylon, that is, 'confusion,' because malice and power consist not in simplicity and purity, not in the distinction of virtue, but in the confusion of vices.
← 第 10 章第 12 章 →
1234567891011121314151617