PROLOGUE OF ST. FULGENTIUS, BISHOP OF RUSPE, TO THE THREE BOOKS ADDRESSED TO MONIMUS. 1. I give thanks to the Lord that you do not cease to bring forth good things out of the good treasure of your heart (Matt. xii, 35). And the gracious tongue that abounds in a good man discloses the purity of your heart. Though it overflows with the streams of eloquence divinely granted, yet I believe that not so much is expressed by words as I know to be contained in the inmost recesses of your heart. For, kindled with divine fire, you so continually share our sufferings that even those tribulations which, though they befell us, were nevertheless overcome with the Lord's help—these too you almost always so suffer on our behalf, that as often as you revolve them in your heart, so often are you in a manner compelled to suffer them.
See how great a good charity possesses, see how great a praise it holds before God and men, that while it grieves over what befalls the one it loves, by frequent remembrance it itself endures the more. This therefore remains, that what charity is wont to do, you may do continually for us. And what else is this than that you should always pray for us to Him in whom you purely love us? For charity ever prays for those it loves, since it fears even those things that are safe. Yet it fears not with that fear which it casts out—for perfect charity casts out fear (1 John iv, 18)—but with that fear which it is wont to have not unto fear, but unto love. It fears therefore not with a timid fear, but with a chaste one.
For it fears not with dread of crime, but with the strength of purity and the firmness of virtue. You further exact of me a debt, which, with the Lord's help, I promise to repay speedily. For I do not profess this debt in the way that your Maro recounts of a certain man, who confessed himself indeed to owe it, but denied that he could repay it; rather, I confess myself to owe that which I do not deny I am able to repay, but promise to do so. For He Himself gives me that whence I may repay, who gave that I should owe. For unless we had received from Him, we could not only not repay, but not even owe at all. For what do we owe one another except charity? Which indeed blessed Paul, speaking these things to the faithful, plainly shows: 'Owe no man anything, but to love one another' (Rom.
xiii, 8). But who would confess a debt, if he denied having received? Therefore, in the very thing which we say we owe, we assuredly show that we have received. For the blessed Apostle says: 'For what have you that you did not receive? And if you received, why do you glory, as though you had not received?' (1 Cor. iv, 7). For in another place too he testifies: 'Because the charity of God is poured forth in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who is given to us' (Rom. v, 5). He therefore who gave us what by repaying we should owe, will Himself grant us the power by which we may repay what we owe. He then is the author of the debt, who is the author of the gift. For He deigned by His own bounty even to make Himself a debtor—not because, being in need, He received from anyone, but because, abounding, He bestowed liberally.
For, entrusting the half-dead man, set upon his own beast, to the innkeeper to be cared for, and giving two denarii, He so professes Himself a debtor as to say, 'Whatever you spend over and above, when I return, I will repay you' (Luke x, 35). But what is 'whatever you spend over and above,' except 'whatever more you receive from me'? For he too who spent over and above, in that he had received no precept but was giving counsel out of charity, professed that he had indeed obtained mercy. For he says: 'Concerning virgins I have no commandment of the Lord, but I give counsel, as one that has obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful' (1 Cor. vii, 25). He therefore obtained mercy, not only that he might receive what to spend, but also that he might spend yet more.
Behold what manner of Lord is ours, that by giving He becomes a debtor, and the more He gives, the more it does not irk Him to be a debtor. For insofar as He bestows freely, so far is He found a debtor. For no one can have Him as a debtor except in that which He Himself has deigned to confer by free bounty. Therefore ask Him continually on my behalf, that He may bestow on me the power of repaying the debt—He who granted that in Him I should owe you the free servitude of charity. For that I may truly confess to your heart—which is my own heart—the whole matter, since I can hide nothing from your heart any more than from my own: it was this consideration that procured for me the slowness in repaying the debt.
Since I was compelled to reply to the empty babblings of a certain heretic, who not only did not hesitate to assail my name under the brand of the Photinian error, but even wished to turn against me the sayings of Saints Augustine and Jerome, as though contrary to my profession. Whose name I have for now deferred to disclose in this letter, but you can doubtless yourself recall it. For while you were staying with us there at Carthage, his sayings were brought to me, and, if I recall rightly, they came also to your knowledge; for nothing could I read while you were there, which I could not offer to you to be reviewed. Those same little books, therefore, if the Lord will, I shall speedily send to your charity.
And I do not doubt that you will deign patiently to bear my slowness in your debt. For I know how greatly you are delighted, and how greatly you yourself ever urge us, that we, with the Lord's help, should not be loath to reply to heretics. BOOK ONE, ON THE TWOFOLD PREDESTINATION OF GOD, THE ONE OF THE GOOD UNTO GLORY, THE OTHER OF THE WICKED UNTO PUNISHMENT. CHAPTER ONE. God inspires us to seek Him, and is found by those who seek. 3. Your letter, dearest son Monimus, as much as it displays the delightful sincerity of your mind and the praiseworthy ardor of your spiritual zeal, so much does it seem, with querulous kindness, to reproach the slowness of my response.
As though I seem to love you less than I ought, in that I have not taken care to respond speedily to your inquiries. But believe me, that just as in the charity of Christ your person is by no means despised in my heart, so my response was delayed not by will, but by the diversity of occupations. Yet nonetheless, amid the very occupations which I am compelled unwillingly to endure, I rejoice with your zeal as much as I am delighted by your charity.
All the more do I embrace the holy purpose of your eagerness, in that, like a truly spiritual merchant pursuing the gains of the inner man and desiring more and more to enlarge the profits of heavenly wares, you first add to the debt you demand of me a further heaping-up through the interest of your questions—so that this very necessity of my slowness may serve the increase of your advantages. Accordingly, I trust in the mercy of our God, that if anything of this inquiry and disputation is not granted me by the work, according to my merit, it will be granted me for the sake of your desire.
For God will in no way allow your inquiry to be defrauded of the effect of discovery—He who kindled you spiritually to inquire—since His faithful promise can by no reasoning be made void, saying: 'Ask, and you shall receive; seek, and you shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you' (Luke xi, 9). The inward Master, therefore, from whom we receive the aid of heavenly teaching, not only opens the secrets of His discourses to us as we inquire, but that we may even inquire, He Himself freely inspires the affection. For neither can we hunger for that bread which came down from heaven (John vi, 33), unless the hunger be given by Him to us who are without appetite—He who deigns to give Himself for the filling of the hungry.
From Him also comes it that we thirsty ones run to the fountain, who gives Himself to us that we may drink. He therefore is to be praised in the grace of both gifts: both when He rouses us, sleeping, to seek Him, and when He grants Himself to be found by us who seek. And He is assuredly in no way found, unless He Himself awakens us that He may be sought. CHAPTER II. On the same argument. Turning over your writings, therefore, as though they were my own bonds, that I might learn from them of how many, or of what, questions I was your debtor, I was able to find, for the present, two letters. One containing the words of Saint Augustine, which he is known to have set down, among other things, in his book on the Perfection of Man's Righteousness, concerning those who are predestined to destruction.
To which I seem to have found immediately subjoined a question—that is, concerning the sacrifice which some think is offered to the Father alone. But in the other letter I found an inquiry placed: What is it that the Apostle was able to spend over and above the two denarii which he received? Since, then, I found only these two letters, I straightway remembered also a third, which was not presented to me by the notary, in which I recall one question is contained concerning the Holy Spirit—namely, why He is asked to be sent by the Father to consecrate the sacrifice of the Body and Blood of the Lord. These, then, for the present, are four questions, of which three are from your two letters, but one I have recalled at the prompting of memory. And if perchance there are others,
which you sent us to be resolved, and you do not find them set down or resolved in this work, I beg that you may not reduce it to contempt or disdain, but patiently pardon it as forgetfulness; especially since that concerning the Holy Spirit, which I recalled even though the letter was not found, I could not pass over in silence. But since you without doubt remember all of them (if perchance there are any), let it not irk you that I be reminded by your writing back. And I hope that, insofar as the Lord shall help, our response will follow, if it be supported by the aid of your preceding prayer. CHAPTER III. The first question, on predestination. The words of Monimus on the twin predestination.
About to seek understanding of the first question, therefore, in the name of Him of whom it is written that 'the Lord gives wisdom, and from His face come knowledge and understanding' (Prov. ii, 6), I have judged it more fitting and convenient to turn over both your own words and those of the blessed Augustine which you set down in your letter: so that, these being reread, both the intention and the solution of the question may more easily be recognized. 'As I was reading,' you say, 'the book on the Perfection of Man's Righteousness, on reconsidering the testimony of the prophet in its order, I with cautious hearing little by little went slowly back over the place where he says: There is none that does good, no, not up to one' (Ps. xiii, 3).
And without any cloud, without any doubt, that most truthful interpreter himself expressed that there is such a kind of men, which does not do good—that kind assuredly predestined to destruction. And, that your discourse might be supported by the eloquence of the aforesaid holy man, subjoining the same words which were spoken by the blessed Augustine (On the Perfection of Righteousness, ch. 13): 'For,' you say, 'the same most glorious Augustine says: We ought here to understand this said of that good of which he there says: God looked down from heaven upon the sons of men, to see if there be any that understands, or seeks after God' (Ps. xiii, 2).
'This good, therefore, which is to seek God, there was none that did it, there was none up to one, but in that kind of men which is predestined to destruction.' Here, determining the sayings of Saint Augustine, and directing the intention of your letter to me, you say that I already understand why you again inculcate these things—namely, that when I often resisted you, saying that predestination is spoken not only in the good, but also in the evil, while you said you had read predestination even unto evil, I myself, teaching, would say that another predestination can be spoken unto the due penalty, not unto the doing of evil. Which you also, as you wrote, confirm. Yet you assert that you know what I would here reply, to defend my opinion—that is, that 'destruction' is spoken of nothing but death.
And you add that meanwhile you had read this, and had even asserted that the people were predestined to destruction. Then you admonish me to consider the discourse of that very passage, and that, as a teacher of my disciples, not as an asserter of my own propositions, I should make you know what is to be followed. CHAPTER IV. The author's modest and theological invocation. I indeed, dearest one, insofar as, by the Lord bestowing His free grace, I am able to recognize the measure of my own littleness, set under that one Lord and Master, in His school, do not aspire to be called the master or teacher of my brethren, whose fellow-disciple in the truth I ever desire to be.
Wherefore I do not cease to ask of that true Lord and Master of ours, that He would deign to teach me those things—whether through the utterances of His Scriptures, or through the discourse of my brethren and fellow-disciples, or even through the inward and sweeter teaching of His inspiration (where, without the sounds of words and without the elements of letters, truth speaks the more sweetly the more secretly)—that He would deign to teach me those things, so that I may so propound them, so assert them, that in my propositions and assertions I may ever cleave to the truth (which neither deceives nor is deceived), and ever be found obedient and consenting.
For that I may be able to obey and consent to the truth, the truth itself illumines, itself helps, itself confirms; from it I ask to be taught the many things I do not know, from which I have received the few things I do know. I beseech it that, by mercy going before and following after, it may teach me whatever things salutary to be known I do not know; may keep me in those things which I truly know; may correct me in those in which, as a man, I am deceived; may confirm me in those true things in which I waver; and may snatch me from things false and harmful—that in my thoughts and words it may find what it salutarily grants, and may cause those things to proceed from my mouth which are first of all pleasing before itself, and so become acceptable to all the faithful. CHAPTER V.
Response to the first question, how some are predestined to destruction. The death of sinners is not predestined by God. Insofar, therefore, as, by the truth itself (which is the true light) illumining my darkness (Ps. xvii, 29), the faculty of understanding has thus far been granted me in the scrutiny of this question, I think that nothing else is to be understood in that discourse of Saint Augustine, in which he affirms that certain persons are predestined to destruction, except unto the destruction of punishment, not of fault; nor unto the evil which they unjustly commit, but unto the torment which they will most justly suffer;
nor unto the sin by which they either do not receive, or lose, the benefit of the first resurrection, but unto the torment which their own iniquity wickedly begets for them and the divine equity rightly requites; nor unto the first death of the soul, in which little children are born, or into which (as the blessed James says) the criminous fall, drawn away and enticed by their own concupiscence (James i, 14), but unto the second death, which they must needs suffer, the most just Judge requiting—whether those who depart from the world before receiving the grace of baptism, or those who, receiving the grace of God in vain (2 Cor.
vi, 1) after receiving baptism, who prefer, unto the end of the present life, to be slaves of sin, and are unwilling, while it is the acceptable time and the day of salvation, to be converted from their evil way, that they may live; and, ignorant that the goodness of God leads them to repentance, they themselves, according to their hardness and impenitent heart, treasure up to themselves wrath in the day of wrath and of the revelation of the just judgment of God (Rom. ii, 4, 5). Of that death, therefore, which sinners have summoned to themselves by hands and words, and, deeming it a friend, have wasted away toward it, it is said: 'Do not court death in the error of your life, neither procure the destruction of your souls, for God made not death, neither has He pleasure in the destruction of the living' (Wis. i, 12-13).
And in another place it is said of this death: 'But by the envy of the devil death entered into the world. And they follow him that are of his portion' (Wis. ii, 24-25). That we might recognize this death to be alien from the work and predestination of God, God Himself thus speaks through the prophet: 'Turn, and turn yourselves away from all your impieties, and they shall not be to you unto the punishment of iniquity. Cast away from you all your iniquities, which you have wickedly done against me, and make yourselves a new heart and a new spirit. And why will you die, O house of Israel? For I desire not the death of him that dies, but that he should turn from his evil way, and his soul should live' (Ezek. xviii, 30-32).
This is the death of impiety, which God did not make, which entered into the world through the devil. In this they follow him who are of his portion. CHAPTER VI. God requites this death with a twofold death. The death of the soul in hell. To this one death, which the sinner summoned to himself unjustly by longing, through contempt of the divine command, God, judging justly, requites a twofold death; that is, the first in the separation of soul and body, the second in the eternal torturing of soul and body. And through this the first, whereby, the soul departing, the flesh alone dies; but the second, when the soul, returning into the flesh, is tortured in the same and with the same flesh in which it sinned;
so that with that with which it shared the death of sin, which the goodness of God forbade to man, it may share the death of punishment, which the divine justice prepared for the sinner. Of this death our Savior says: 'Fear not those who kill the body, but cannot kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell' (Matt. x, 28). That the wicked, therefore, perish before hell, is not of the divine work, but of the human. But that they are to perish in hell, this the equity of God brings about, to whom no iniquity of the sinner is pleasing. For 'he who loves iniquity hates his own soul' (Ps. x, 6). And John says: 'Because everyone who commits sin commits also iniquity;
and sin is iniquity' (1 John iii, 4). And God says through the prophet: 'For the soul that sins, the same shall die' (Ezek. xviii, 4). But concerning the Son of God, John says: 'We know that He appeared to take away sins, and in Him there is no sin' (1 John iii, 5). As, therefore, sin is not in Him, so sin is not from Him. But what is not from Him is assuredly not His work. And what is never in His work was never in His predestination. CHAPTER VII. How the wicked are predestined by God, not unto guilt, but unto punishment. God forestalls those to be saved, and finds those to be damned.
The wicked, therefore, are not predestined to this, that they do evil, drawn away and enticed by their own concupiscence, but to this, that they justly suffer against their will. For by the name of predestination there is not expressed some coercive necessity of the human will, but the merciful and just everlasting disposition of the future divine work is proclaimed. 'Unto God,' therefore, 'mercy and judgment sing' (Ps. c, 1), O Church, whose work this is in man: that by the hidden—yet not unjust—counsel of His will, He may either bestow gratuitous mercy on the wretched, or repay due justice to the unjust. Nay, either mercifully to remit to the debtor what He could justly exact if He willed, or justly to exact His own with interest (Matt.
xxv, 27), and repay to the wicked debtor what is owed to his iniquities. And thus, either He forestalls the one utterly unworthy of mercy, or He finds the other worthy of wrath. For He Himself freely gives grace to the unworthy, by which the ungodly, being justified, may be enlightened with the gift of a good will and the capacity for good action, so that by preceding mercy he may begin to will the good, and by following mercy he may be able to do the good which he wills. And both of these, by predestining, God prepared in that unchangeable will, in which He so disposed the future effect of the man to be renewed, that His will in the new work cannot be new. CHAPTER VIII. The grace of God both initiates man's merit unto righteousness and consummates it unto glory.
How the will is prepared by the Lord. He also gives grace to the worthy in the requital of the eternal reward: namely, that whether when the just One piously justifies the ungodly (since concerning Him the Apostle says, 'That He might be just, and the justifier of him who is of the faith of Jesus,' Rom. iii, 26), or when the merciful One justly glorifies the just (since 'whom He justified, them He also glorified,' Rom. viii, 30), it may be the same operation of grace, which both initiates man's good merit unto righteousness and consummates it unto glory.
First He begins the good will in man; then He assists that same will once begun, so that the same will may both be good by the divine gift and be able, by the divine help, to overcome evil concupiscence, and so that, with God bringing it to perfection, that will may afterward become such that it can no longer harbor evil concupiscence. And thus in the present life, by the help of grace, it does not yield to its weakness, while in the life to come, by the benefit of grace, it will have no weakness at all. Now it is continually restored by the succor of the remedy, but then it will truly enjoy the eternal fullness of health. And these things God does, just as He has always held them in predestination, so by grace He accomplishes them exactly as He had predestined.
And so the acknowledgment of that very predestination is conveyed when Scripture says: And the will is prepared by the Lord (Prov. VIII, 35, according to the Septuagint). Now it is called prepared for no other reason than that it is foretold as something to be given. For by Him from whom it is prepared through His everlasting goodness, by that same One it is given through undeserved grace. This the Lord Himself attests through the prophecy of Ezekiel, saying: I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit will I put within you, and I will take away the heart of stone from your flesh, and I will give you a heart of flesh, and my Spirit I will put within you. And I will cause you to walk in my justifications and to observe my judgments and to do them (Ezek. XXXVI, 26).
God therefore gives a new heart, that we may walk in His justifications, which pertains to the beginning of a good will. He also gives that we may observe and do His judgments, which pertains to the effect of good working. CHAPTER IX. Both the will and the capacity for good work are from God. In God we shall do valor, that is, the work of virtue. He who does the truth comes to the light. God Himself works every good work in us. Whence we recognize that it is of God both that we should will to do good and that we should be able to do good. With this understanding David wholly agrees, thus showing that the grace of willing well is bestowed by the directing of the divine bounty: By the Lord shall the steps of a man be directed, and He shall will his way (Ps. XXXVI, 23).
He testifies also that good work is done only by God in us, and in God by us, saying: Confirm this, O God, which Thou hast wrought in us (Ps. LXVII, 29). And in another place: In God we shall do valor (Ps. LIX, 14), that is, the work of virtue. Here he said 'valor is done' in place of the work of virtue, just as John said 'righteousness is done' in place of the work of righteousness. For he says: He who does righteousness is righteous, even as He is righteous (1 John III, 7). Paul too declares that God's will is wrought in us as our desire, saying: Now the God of peace, who brought again from the dead the great shepherd of the sheep, in the blood of the eternal testament, our Lord Jesus, fit you in every good thing, that you may do His will (Heb. XIII, 20).
But what is it to do His will, except to do the works which His will inspires in us and works within us? We find something of this kind also in the sayings of our very Redeemer, when He speaks of truth being done, in place of the work of truth. For thus He speaks: Everyone who does evil hates the light, and does not come to the light, lest his works be reproved. But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his works may be made manifest, because they are wrought in God (John III, 20). Now this we do in God: that which, when God works it in us, is granted to us to do. This is plainly shown in the Epistle to the Hebrews, where, when it had been said of God: Fit you in every good thing, that you may do His will, there immediately follows:
Working in you what is pleasing in His sight (Heb. XIII, 21). Every work, therefore, which is done by us in God, God works in us. For from Him, and through Him, and in Him are all things (Rom. XI, 36). From Him, therefore, is both the good will and the good working. This the Teacher of the Gentiles affirms in these words: For it is God who works in you both to will and to accomplish, according to His good will (Phil. II, 13). Therefore, just as Solomon says that the will is prepared by the Lord, so too Paul asserts that our good works have been prepared by the Lord, that is, arranged in predestination. And so he says: By grace you have been saved through faith, and this not of yourselves, but it is the gift of God. Not of works, that no one may boast;
for we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God has prepared that we should walk in them (Eph. II, 8). Just as, therefore, the will by which we would will the good has been prepared by the Lord through predestination, so also God has prepared good works, that we should walk in them. CHAPTER X. Not only the will, but also good work and eternal life, are prepared by God through predestination. Let us also consider eternal life and the kingdom of heaven, divinely prepared by faith for the faithful. For Christ Himself shows that He will say to those on His right: Come, you blessed of my Father, receive the kingdom which has been prepared for you from the foundation of the world (Matt. XXV, 34). But this too is a work of grace.
For out of grace is given not only a good life to the justified, but also eternal life to the glorified. This we hold as ascertained by Paul's preaching, when he says: For the wages of sin is death. But the grace of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord (Rom. VI, 23). But why is death called wages, while eternal life is called grace, except that the one is repaid, the other is bestowed? Yet when God repays that death, He punishes the evil work of sinful man, which man would by no means have done had he not departed from God. But when God bestows eternal life, He brings to perfection His own work, which He began by justifying the ungodly, by glorifying the just. And both of these—that is, both the good life and eternal life—are in Christ Jesus our Lord.
1:39
Deplenitudinequippeejusnosomnesaccepimus, etgratiamprogratia (Joan. i, 16), scilicetgratiamglorificationisæternæprogratiajustificationisindebitæ, utgratiajustificationisomnemeritummalumdeleatindebitobeneficio : etmeritumbonumjugiconfirmetauxilio, cuigratiaglorificationisjustæreddaturinpræmio. Gratiaautemetiamipsaideononinjustedicitur, quianonsolumdonissuisDeusdonasuareddit: sedquiatantumetiamibigratiadivinaeretributionisexuberat, utincomparabiliteratqueineffabiliteromnemeritum, quamvisbonæetexDeodatæ, humanævoluntatisatqueoperationis, ex - cedat.
For of His fullness we have all received, and grace for grace (John I, 16), namely the grace of eternal glorification for the grace of undeserved justification, so that the grace of justification may blot out all evil merit by an undeserved benefit, and may strengthen good merit with unceasing help—the merit to which the grace of just glorification is repaid as a reward. Yet even this grace is not unjustly called grace, because God not only repays His own gifts with His own gifts, but because there too the grace of divine recompense so overflows that it incomparably and ineffably surpasses all merit—however good and given by God—of human will and working.
For although the blessed Apostle Paul shows that God gives us not only the light of believing in Christ, but also the virtue of suffering for Him, saying: For to you it has been granted for Christ's sake, not only to believe in Him, but also to suffer for Him (Phil. I, 29)—both of which pertain to the grace of the present good life—yet he sets that grace of the future life before all the sufferings of the present time, saying: The sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the future glory that shall be revealed in us (Rom. VIII, 18). And in another place: For that which is at present momentary and light in our tribulation works for us above measure exceedingly an eternal weight of glory (2 Cor. IV, 17). CHAPTER XI.
Grace begins by going before, and by following after it guards the good work. In predestination is contained all the grace of calling, of justification, and of glorification. He says that this grace abides not only in the justification of the present life, but also in the recompense of the age to come, and he asserts that it abounds upon us, that is, above all the good merits of any man whatsoever, in the goodness of God, saying: That He might show in the ages to come the exceeding riches of His grace, in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus (Eph. II, 7). Grace, therefore, is a merciful recompense, by which God in the present time repays good things for evils—namely to those ungodly whom He justifies, so that faith may be reckoned unto righteousness.
Of this recompense David says: What shall I render to the Lord for all the things that He has rendered to me (Ps. CXV, 12)? Grace is also that just recompense by which God, repaying better things for His own good things, will glorify the just. And this too will be a work of grace. For in order that they may merit this, grace itself, going before, mercifully begins it; grace itself, following after, guards it. This grace is also called mercy in the Scriptures. Of it David says: My God, His mercy shall go before me (Ps. LVIII, 11). And in another place: Thy mercy shall follow me all the days of my life (Ps. XXII, 6). It goes before the ungodly, that he may become just; it follows after the just, that he may not become ungodly. It goes before the blind man, to give him the light he has not found;
it follows after the seeing man, to preserve the light it has conferred. It goes before the fallen, that he may rise; it follows after the raised, that he may not fall. It goes before, granting to man a good will; it follows after the well-willing, working in him the capacity for good work. This, therefore, is what this mercy of God follows after in man: what it, going before, itself bestows. And so it not only recalls the erring to the way by justifying him, but also guards and helps the one who walks well, that it may lead him to the gift of eternal glorification. And all these—that is, both the beginnings of our calling, the increases of justification, and the rewards of glorification—God has always held in predestination:
because in the calling, in the justification, and in the glorification of the saints, He foreknew the future works of His grace. On this account the Apostle assigns the whole to God, saying: For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. And whom He predestined, these He also called; and whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified (Rom. VIII, 29). Nevertheless, when we hear the justified and the glorified named together, let us not attribute both the work of justification and of glorification to the present time. For the grace of justification is given in the present, but that of glorification is reserved for the future. The one belongs to faith, the other to hope.
And Paul says: For now we walk by faith, not by sight (2 Cor. V, 7). For what the saints now believe, they shall then see. Wherefore it is said to the Church: Hearken, O daughter, and see; because faith comes by hearing—whence the just man, living by faith, says with confidence: I believe I shall see the good things of the Lord in the land of the living (Ps. XXVI, 13). This, then, is the order of divine redemption and recompense in man: that being now justified he should believe what, being then glorified, he shall receive. Wherefore Paul says: Not that I have already attained, or am already perfect (Phil. III, 12). CHAPTER XII. God is said to have done what He predestined to be done. God's promises are certain from His omnipotence.
In this justification, therefore, the saints as they go, go forth and weep, casting their seed; but in that glorification, coming they shall come with exultation, bearing their sheaves. In this the laborers of the householder work in the vineyard; but in that they shall without doubt enjoy the reward of the denarius. This God now bestows, that one who is unworthy may freely receive the beginning of good merit; but that other He keeps reserved for the future, whereby he who received the beginning of good merit while unworthy may become worthy to receive the reward of good merit. Therefore, when Paul says: Because whom God justified, these He also glorified (Rom.
VIII, 30), he does not attribute both to the present life, but by that faith whereby he holds what is future as already done, he confirms it—the faith by which the prophet says of God: Who has made the things that are to come. For in that immovability of His counsel, according to His good pleasure, which He purposed in Him, in the dispensation of the fullness of times, to gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth (Eph. I, 9-10)—in Him, from the eternity of His disposing, in predestination He has already done whatsoever, by the effect of His own work, He arranged to be done at the fitting time. For just as no work of the Creator could be, nor can be, made without a beginning:
so that everlasting will of His is never subject to mutability, because it has no beginning of existence. And that which always is, in such a way that it did not begin to be, is without doubt in such a way that what it is cannot fail to be. True immutability, therefore, is worthily called true eternity; and in that eternity of His unchangeable will the Creator is said already to have done what, in the mutable creature, according as He disposed it to be done opportunely, He duly brings about when it has been thus disposed. And therefore whatsoever He has promised, we say is already done, because we ought not to doubt concerning the things to be done.
For our father Abraham (as the Apostle says) did not waver at God's promise through distrust, but was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God, being most fully assured that whatsoever He has promised, He is able also to perform (Rom. IV, 20-21). Therefore in God's promises there is no falsehood, because in the things to be done there is no difficulty for the Almighty. And for that reason the effect of His will is never lacking there, because that will itself is found to be nothing other than power. Whatever He wills, He can do—He who can do as much as He wills. Therefore of Him alone it is worthily said: Whatsoever He willed, He did (Ps. CXIII, 11). And again: For it is in Thy power, when Thou wilt, to be able (Wis. XII, 18).
Therefore we said that the power of His will is as great as is that very will of power. Because in Him for whom to be able is always at hand when He wills, to will is nothing other than to be able. CHAPTER XIII. God's just predestination to punishment for sins. God shows grace to the saints, justice to the ungodly. The future wrath of God is condemnation unto punishment. Since, therefore, God is compelled by no necessity to promise anything unwillingly, He is surely hindered by the obstacle of no adversity from doing what He has promised either less than He wills or more slowly. Accordingly He was able, just as He willed, to predestine some to glory, some to punishment. But those whom He predestined to glory, He predestined to righteousness.
But those whom He predestined to punishment, He did not predestine to guilt. For some sin could be from God's predestination, if any man could sin justly. But no man sins justly, although God justly permits him to sin. For he is justly forsaken by God who forsakes God. And because man, forsaking God, sins, God, forsaking the sinner, keeps justice. And what is more just than that he who already sins by the desire of sinning should, for the very reason that, desiring to sin, he makes himself hurtful to himself, be permitted to wound himself by his own sin? In the saints, therefore, God crowns the righteousness which He Himself freely bestowed on them, freely preserved, and freely perfected.
But the wicked He will condemn for the impiety or injustice which He Himself did not work in them. For in the former He glorifies His own works, but in the latter He condemns works not His own. This, therefore, God predestined: what He Himself was going to do, or what He was going to bestow. But that He by no means predestined which He Himself was not going to do, whether through grace or through justice. Accordingly it seems that it must be inquired most diligently what God works in those whom He freely justifies, and what also in those whom He justly condemns. For the excellent Teacher of the Gentiles says: But if our iniquity commend the justice of God, what shall we say? Is God unjust, who inflicts wrath? (I speak as a man.) God forbid! (Rom. III, 5).
Here he put wrath in place of condemnation, just as elsewhere John the Baptist says: He who is unbelieving to the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides upon him (John III, 36). This wrath he announces with rebuke to the Pharisees and Sadducees, saying: Brood of vipers, who has shown you to flee from the wrath to come? (Matt. III, 7; Luke III, 7). From this wrath the Lord Christ has rescued us, which Paul confirmed by truthful preaching, saying to the Thessalonians: How you turned to God from idols, to serve the living and true God, and to await His Son from heaven, whom He raised from the dead, Jesus, who has rescued us from the wrath to come (1 Thess. I, 9-10).
This wrath, that is, the punishment which is prepared for the wicked, he calls destruction in another place, saying: For when they shall say peace and security, then sudden destruction shall come upon them, as travail upon her that is with child, and they shall not escape (1 Thess. V, 3). CHAPTER XIV. Whether the works of the damned are predestined like the works of the just. The beginning of good will is predestined by God. God causes us to do good. Let us therefore inquire whether God is to be believed to have predestined the works of the wicked, for which He condemns them, just as He is said to have predestined in the saints what He crowns. But when we inquire into the cause of the condemnation of the wicked and the glorification of the saints, we do not deny that they are predestined, either the former to punishment or the latter to glory.
But whether, just as the good works are believed to be divinely predestined, for which the just shall be glorified, so too the evil works are to be believed divinely predestined, for which the unjust shall be punished forever. For it is said in the book of Psalms: The unjust shall be punished, and the seed of the ungodly shall perish; but the salvation of the just is from the Lord (Ps. XXXVI, 28). Of both our Savior also says: Then those shall go into everlasting burning, but the just into life eternal (Matt. XXV, 46). In both, therefore, that is, in the just and the unjust, I judge that three things must be considered: the beginning of the will, the progress of the work, the end of recompense. So that whatever just and good things we see in these, we may attribute to the just and good God;
but those things we may know to be unworthy of God, in which we find neither goodness nor justice. And having considered the quality of the works, let us believe those to have been predestined by God which are found worthy of and fitting to the divine mercy or equity: For the Lord is merciful and compassionate and just (Ps. CXI, 4). And first of all we confess that the beginning of every good will has been both predestined and given by that everlasting Trinity, which is the one, only, and true God. For He has bestowed on man, prepared by free justification, that which He had prepared to be bestowed in the eternal predestination. This preparation of the will I have shown above by the testimony of Holy Scripture, where it was said: The will is prepared by the Lord.
By Him, therefore, the will is prepared, who mercifully works in us both to will and to accomplish. For the Apostle says: For it is God who works in us both to will and to accomplish, according to His good will (Phil. II, 13). God also, speaking through the prophet, affirms that He Himself does what He grants to the faithful to do, according to that oracle which we have already set down above, where He says: And I will cause you to walk in my justifications, and to observe my judgments and to do them (Ezek. XXXVI, 27). But what is 'I will cause you to do,' except 'every good that you shall have wrought shall be of my working'? He Himself, therefore, causes us to do, so that, with Him working in us, every good that we do comes to pass. Of which it is said to the Hebrews:
Fit you in every good thing, working in you what is pleasing in His sight (Heb. XIII, 21). And so, God's grace having been demonstrated in the good will and working of man, who would contend that the glory of the future recompense also, which shall be given to the saints, is not of the divine grace? Since whether we believe or work—though the faith be ours, and the works be ours, as the Lord Himself says: According to your faith be it unto you, and blessed John proclaims: This is the victory that overcomes the world, our faith (1 John V, 4), and Paul also thus writes: I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, because your faith is announced in all the world (Rom. I, 8)—our works too the Lord Himself attests, saying:
So let your light shine before men, that seeing your good works they may glorify your Father who is in heaven (Matt. V, 16). Yet because these things, when we have them, we do not have as born of ourselves, but as given by God—as the Apostle says: Now we have received not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is from God, that we may know the things that are given to us by God (1 Cor. II, 12); and because whatsoever He grants us to do, just as we cannot have unless He bestows it on us, so we cannot do unless He Himself works in us what He has bestowed. CHAPTER XV. We ought not to ascribe to ourselves any good work as our own. In this life no one is perfect except in the hope of future glory. Paul both perfect and imperfect.
Therefore we are by no means permitted—indeed we are wholesomely forbidden—to claim anything for ourselves as our own, either in our faith or in our work. For the Vessel of election says: What have you that you did not receive? And if you received it, why do you boast, as if you had not received it (1 Cor. IV, 7)? And in the holy Gospel the voice of the Lord's forerunner is: A man can receive nothing, unless it be given him from heaven (John III, 27). The apostle James also testifies: That every best gift, and every perfect gift, is from above, coming down from the Father of lights (James I, 17). And what is a more perfect gift than the future glorification of the saints?
For now (so to speak) the perfection of the divine gifts is not yet a perfect perfection, seeing that here everyone who is perfect is still in need of perfection. For that same one who said: As many as, therefore, are perfect, let us be thus minded (Phil. III, 15), the same one says: Not that I have already attained, or am already perfect (Ibid. 12). He was, therefore, perfect in the hope of future glorification; but he was imperfect under the burden of corruption and mortality. For the body which is corrupted weighs down the soul, and the earthly habitation presses down the mind that muses on many things (Wis. IX, 15). He was perfect in the expectation of the reward; he was imperfect in the weariness of the struggle. He was perfect, in that with his mind he served the law of God;
he was imperfect, in that with his flesh he served the law of sin. He was perfect, having a desire to be dissolved and to be with Christ (Phil. I, 23); but he was imperfect, because as long as he was in the body, he was absent from the Lord. He was perfect, being most fully assured that God, whatsoever He has promised, is able also to perform (Rom. IV, 21); but he was imperfect, because God has not yet done in His saints certain things out of all that He promised. Wherefore also all the ancient just (as the same Apostle says), being approved by the testimony of faith, did not receive the promise, God providing something better for us, that they should not be made perfect without us (Heb. XI, 39-40).
Just as, therefore, the preceding saints, approved by the testimony of faith, are not made perfect without the perfection of those who follow, so those who follow cannot be perfected without those who precede. And so the perfect gift shall then be given to all when eternal glorification shall be bestowed on the saints. Then, as Truth says: The just shall shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father (Matt. XIII, 43). This perfect gift, therefore, is also His, from whom is the beginning of every gift. And it would certainly not be called a gift, if this too were not bestowed out of grace. CHAPTER XVI. God freely works our salvation. True glory is from God alone. Now there is one God, who freely both calls the predestined, and justifies the called, and glorifies the justified.
And just as to justify is nothing other than to make just, so to glorify is nothing other than to make glorious. Accordingly, since God both justifies and glorifies His own, just as it is a work of His grace when He makes them just, so it will be a work of His grace when He makes them glorious. For just as no one can have true righteousness unless he has been justified, so no one can have true glory unless he has been glorified. And whence true glory comes, our Savior showed when He rebuked the Jews, saying: How can you believe, who receive glory from one another, and the glory which is from God alone you do not seek (John V, 44)? Having this same understanding and truthfully saying:
But we have the mind of Christ (1 Cor. II, 16); just as he knew that true glory is from God, so he confirms that true righteousness is from God, saying: That I may be found in Him not having my own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is of the faith of Christ, which is of God, the righteousness in faith (Phil. III, 9). And although abundant proofs abound by which it may be clear that not only the grace of good will and good working, but also the very glorification of the saints, is both begun and perfected wholly by God, yet I judge that even these things which have been set down by us suffice, such as they are. CHAPTER XVII. The beginning of all sin is pride. The fall and punishment of Lucifer. The fall of the first man.
And so now, that the course of the little book may be duly ordered, we ought also to consider the will, the working, and the recompense of the wicked. So that we may recognize whether the just God predestined the wicked to do that which He is going to punish as done in them; or whether He justly predestined the unjust to punishment, because, although He foreknew their evil works as future, He did not Himself predestine them to be future, since He Himself did not cause them to come to pass. And so, if the beginning of sin is sought, nothing else but pride is found. For Scripture says: The beginning of all sin is pride (Ecclus. X, 15).
This indeed took its beginning when the angel, lifted up against God, and by that very lifting-up cast down, through concupiscence (which is the root of all evils) willing to usurp what had not been given him by God, departed from God and fell; in which if he had stood, he would not have fallen. But through evil concupiscence, because he coveted more outside himself, he was made less within himself. This concupiscence, although he could not fulfill it in deed, he yet retained in will. Thus he himself became already a punishment to himself, so that his evil will was ever a torment to the evil one, just as his very blindness is to the blind man.
And the concupiscence of sinning became a torment to the sinner; and the rebel and deserter, who had fled that undisturbed rest, thenceforth served disturbance, and was justly abandoned by his good Lord, whom he himself unjustly abandoned. Thus it came to pass that, persevering as disordered of himself, he was ordered in himself; and in him who lost order within himself, the reason of the divine order did not perish. This also befell man, whom the devil himself cast down by his serpentine cunning. For dissenting from the good Lord, and consenting to the evil servant, he could not attain the full effect of an evil will: because that very malice of the will was not from God. For he would not have had it, if he had not departed from God. CHAPTER XVIII.
The rational creature cannot be blessed unless it loves the Creator more than itself. The rational will, if it subjects itself to God, is exalted; if it lifts itself up, it is cast down. God makes the humble; He does not find them. God, therefore, being good, is the founder of good natures. For God saw (as it is written) all the things that He had made, and behold they were very good (Gen. I, 31). Among all the things which He made, He made the rational creature better than the rest. Yet He willed the greater good to be present in the higher creature in such a way that no evil was substantially present even in the lowest creature.
And through this, the created good superior to the lowest good would be better, over which the highest good (which is not created, and by which every mutable created good is created) would justly rule; and by whose participation it would also be blessed, if with humble love it served the highest good. For to the rational creature there neither could, nor can, nor shall be any beatitude other than this: that, acknowledging Him by whom it was not only made, but also by whom it was made rational, it should render greater love to its good Creator than to itself.
For reason could in no way be present in it, unless the love of its Creator could be present in it; for there is no other thing that would be the true wisdom or understanding of a rational creature except the love of the Creator, in which its self-love is the greater or the less in proportion as it shows the greater or the less love to its Creator. Moreover, the will of a rational creature cannot exist without some kind of love; nor can it love in such a way that it does not wish to bind its love to something. Placed as it is in a kind of middle position between the highest good, by which it was created, and the lowest good, over which it was set, it must of necessity either lie wretchedly in the lowest good, or rest truly and blessedly in the highest good.
For it is carried along by a certain love: either when by obedience it is lifted up, and rightly subjects itself to the good Creator; or when by pride it is cast down, so that it wickedly seeks to lord it over the good creature. For just as it becomes lowly through self-exaltation, so it becomes exalted through humility. For our Lord and Master says: Everyone who exalts himself shall be humbled, and he who humbles himself shall be exalted (Luke XIV, 11). On account of which it is likewise written: God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble (James IV, 6; 1 Peter V, 5). Nor indeed does God find the humble already humble, to whom He gives grace, before it is given; but by giving grace He makes them humble. For this very thing God bestows through grace: that whoever receives it becomes humble.
On account of which the Only-begotten Himself, the teacher and bestower of holy humility, says: Learn of me, for I am meek and humble of heart, and you shall find rest for your souls (Matthew XI, 29). This rest they have lost who, having cast off humility, swelled up against their own life and fell back into death through pride. For of such it is said: You cast them down while they were lifting themselves up (Psalm LXXII, 18). And to such God therefore resists, because He Himself did not make the pride in them, through which they unjustly choose to fall into sin, and through which they justly deserve to remain in sin. CHAPTER XIX. Ruin is not from God, but from pride. God is the avenger of sin, not its author.
Accordingly, since the beginning of an evil will is pride, which is not from God, it is plainly clear that the ruin of evil action does not come to men from God, but that the ruin of retribution is repaid to the wicked by the just Judge. For an evil will does not pertain to the best Creator; but the just condemnation of an unjust angel or man pertains to the most equitable Judge. To an evil will, therefore, God did not predestine man, because He Himself was not going to give it to man. For how could God predestine to an evil will the man whom He made to His own image—a will which He Himself did not make? And so man began to sin in that very act by which he departed from God. For it is written: The beginning of pride is to apostatize from God (Ecclesiasticus X, 14).
And in another place: Behold, all who remove themselves far from you shall perish; you have destroyed all who commit fornication against you (Psalm LXXII, 27). Those, therefore, who remove themselves far and commit fornication against God, surely perish by sinning through their own evil will, which is not from God. But God will destroy them by judging justly, which befits God. For God would not destroy them by judgment, unless they had first perished through their own iniquities. For it is written: They have failed, they have perished because of their own iniquity (ibidem). The falling away, therefore, from the highest good to the lowest good—this is the sinner's own and voluntary evil, by which evil the unjust man destroys himself.
And since God is not the author of this evil, but rather perverse man is, it is therefore fitting that to the man who has destroyed himself by sin, eternal perdition in torments should be repaid: so that he who willed to perish should indeed perish, yet should not perish in the manner in which he willed. For he who so perished, enticed by the delight of his sins, that, were it possible to come about, he would remain forever in the work of sin, is indeed justly abandoned in the perdition of sin, into which he fell by his own will. But he was not there to be dismissed with impunity, lest the faithful God, in whom there is no iniquity, who is just and holy, if He were to leave the sinner forever unpunished in his sin, should be thought to be pleased with the sin. This opinion God rebukes in certain persons through the prophet Malachi, who say:
Everyone who does evil is good in the sight of the Lord, and He is pleased with him; and where is the God of justice? (Malachi II, 17). Justly, therefore, the severity of the Judge has followed, where the iniquity of the sinner went before; for God is the avenger of that thing of which He is not the author, that is, of iniquity, which God can punish but not make. For it is written: Everyone who commits sin also commits iniquity, and sin is iniquity. And you know that He appeared to take away sins, and in Him there is no sin. Everyone who abides in Him does not sin (1 John III, 4–6). And again: A faithful God, in whom there is no iniquity, just and holy is the Lord (Deuteronomy XXXII, 4). Iniquity therefore, since it is not in God, is surely not from God.
CHAPTER XX. Iniquity comes from the disordered love of the world. The beginning of sin is disordered love. But what is iniquity except evil concupiscence? That this is not from God the apostle John makes plain, saying: If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him; for all that is in the world is the concupiscence of the flesh, and the concupiscence of the eyes, and the pride of life, which is not from the Father but is from the world (1 John II, 15, 16). Here, however, by the name of the world he signifies men who are lovers of this world:
who are not to be punished on account of the love of the world because they love some evil substance—since by nature no substance is evil—but because, not keeping the order of love, while they love the world more than is right, they love God less than they ought to have loved Him. But God made nothing disordered, nor did He predestine anything to be made in a disordered way, He who commands through His apostle that all things be done honestly and according to order (1 Corinthians XIV, 40). On account of which, in the holy oracles too, that sin may be avoided, love is commanded to be set in order. For it is written: He set love in order within me (Canticles II, 4). To this order the Apostle offers congratulation, saying: For though I am absent in body, yet I am with you in spirit, rejoicing,
and seeing your order (Colossians II, 5). But if the beginning of sin be considered, I think it is nothing else than the disordered love, on the part of the rational creature, of things ordered by God—a love which, by willingly losing the order of love, lost salvation as well. To this the rational creature was not predestined by God. For His predestination is nothing other than the eternal preparation of His future works, in which no cause of any evil can be found, because the origin of sin never proceeded from the will of God. CHAPTER XXI. God does not predestine man to sin. The predestination of the good is from the free mercy of God. For the Lord is merciful and just, of whom it is written in another place:
The Lord God loves mercy and truth (Psalm LXXXIII, 12). In all His works, therefore, either just truth is preserved, or loving mercy is bestowed beforehand. Moreover, since we cannot deny that man was made good by the good God, if we should say that he was predestined by God to some evil work, we ascribe such a work (which be far from us) to the merciful and just God, in whom neither the merciful nor the just could be found. For if, when man was being made by God, he was so good in the present work of God, yet in His predestination was evil, then without doubt he was going to be evil by the work of God, by whom he was being predestined to sin. Whereupon there would at once follow that absurdity, that it be said that God—of whom the prophet says:
He who made the things that are to come (Isaiah IX)—had in Himself (which be far from Him) the origin of iniquity, if He had predestined as a sinner the man made by Himself; for His predestination is the preparation of His works. And just as it befits the good God to be the cause of every good work, so it is incongruous that the cause of any evil work be imputed to Him. Further, let us note that no reason can be given why man should be believed to have been predestined by God to sin.
For if, in those whom the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ has blessed with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, even as He chose them in Him before the foundation of the world, that they should be holy and unspotted in His sight in love, who predestined them unto the adoption of sons through Jesus Christ unto Himself (Ephesians I, 4, 5)—if, then, in these the cause of predestination be sought, no other cause whatever is found, but only the free mercy of God. For He it is of whom the psalm says: The Lord is merciful and compassionate, long-suffering and of great mercy: He will not be angry forever, nor will He threaten for eternity:
He has not dealt with us according to our sins, nor rewarded us according to our iniquities. For as far as the heaven is high above the earth, so far has He removed our iniquities from us. As a father has compassion on his children, so has the Lord had compassion on those who fear Him (Psalm CII, 8). In all these so many and so great good things which the Lord repays to the wicked, what else is sung of but undeserved mercy? what else is proclaimed but free tenderness? For in this too, that He has not dealt with us according to our sins, nor rewarded us according to our iniquities, the free justification of the ungodly is made manifest.
And in this, that as a father has compassion on his children, so has the Lord had compassion on those who fear Him, there shines forth, through the same justification of faith, the free adoption of sons. For He would not have compassion as a father on His children, unless, having by grace become our Father, He deigned to make us His sons. For as many as received Him, to them He gave power to become the sons of God (John I, 12). CHAPTER XXII. No one is predestined to the committing of sins. This is the cause of divine predestination in the saints: namely, the preparation of an undeserved justification and adoption, which, because the evil will of man did not merit it, has no cause except the good will of God alone.
But in those who are thought to be predestined, not to the paying of punishments, but to the committing of sins, when the cause of predestination is sought, I do not find what anyone could answer who ponders to assert this. For surely, just as we rightly say that the saints were predestined to this end, that, God working mercifully in them, they might from evil become good, and from ungodly become just—which when we say it, we say to the glory of God—can we likewise rightly say that the wicked were predestined to this end, that, God working in them, even if not mercifully, at least justly, they might from good become evil, or from just become ungodly? Far be this from us and from all Christians, that anyone should dare to impute to the divine equity the cause of any sin whatsoever:
since there can be no cause of anyone's malice or impiety except in him who has been evil and impious. Therefore, that men should from evil become good, and from ungodly become just, the mercy of God is to be praised; but that from good men should become evil, or from just become wicked—if the cause of this be asserted to be divine predestination, then justice (which be far from it) will be blameworthy. Nay rather, justice will not even be called just, if it be said not to have found the guilty one to be punished, but to have made him so. And there will be a still greater injustice, if God repays punishment to the one who has fallen, whom He is said to have predestined to ruin while he yet stood. CHAPTER XXIII. Man's evil will is not God's planting. The gentle and good Lord did not create the bitterness and malice of a perverse will.
1:88
PræscivitDeushominespeccaturos, sedeosadpeccandumnonprædestinavit. Quaeroautemcurprimumhominem, quem (sicutscriptumest) fecitDominusrectum (Ecclea. VII, 30), prædestinarepotueritadpeccandum, idestadvo-luntatemmalam, quaeesttotiusorigopeccati, quamutiqueautretribuisseDeumnondumpeccantihomini, autretribuissecredendumestpeccatori. Hancitaquesinondumpeccantihominitribuit, ipse (quodabsit) auctoriniquitatisexstitit, quimalamvoluntatemdedithominibono, perquampeccansaeternomereturpunirisupplicio. Etubiest, quiaDeusmortemnonfecit (Sap. i, 13) ? EtquianonestiniquitasapudDeum?
God foreknew that men would sin, but He did not predestine them to sin. But I ask why He could have predestined to sin—that is, to an evil will, which is the origin of all sin—the first man, whom (as it is written) the Lord made upright (Ecclesiastes VII, 30); this will, surely, must be believed either to have been given by God to a man not yet sinning, or to have been repaid to a sinner. And so, if He bestowed it upon a man not yet sinning, then He Himself (which be far from Him) proved to be the author of iniquity, having given an evil will to a good man, through which, by sinning, he deserves to be punished with eternal torment. And where then is the truth that God did not make death (Wisdom I, 13)? And that there is no iniquity with God?
And that the Lord is just and has loved justice, His countenance has beheld equity (Psalm X, 8)? But if He did not bestow the beginning of an evil will upon the sinful man, but repaid it, so that it is believed sin began from man, yet the beginning of the evil will is said to have been rendered by God—what sin then could man have committed, in which an evil will was not present? For no fruit of iniquity can spring up except that which the root of an evil will has brought forth. For out of the heart (as the Truth says) proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies. These are the things that defile a man (Matthew XV, 19).
On account of which God Himself, through Jeremiah, thus rebukes the malice of the human will, so as to teach fully that it is alien to Him. For He says: I planted you a fruitful vine; how then have you turned into the bitterness of a strange vine? (Jeremiah II, 21). He calls it a vine alien to Himself, surely not through any fault of the divine creating, but through the turning-away of its own will, which is justly blamed, in that it brought forth a bitterness which God Himself did not make in it. For it had that very bitterness neither from God's predestination, nor from God's work, but from the malice of its own will. For which bitterness God again rebukes it thus, through the aforementioned prophet:
Know and see how evil and bitter it is for you to have forsaken the Lord your God, and that My fear is not with you (ibid., 19). Since, therefore, this is for a man an evil and bitter thing—to have forsaken the Lord, and that the fear of God is not in him—who could be so opposed to the truth as to suppose that man was predestined by the good and gentle God (of whom it is written): How good is the God of Israel to those who are upright of heart (Psalm LXXII, 1)? And since none is good but God alone (Mark X, 18); and of whom the Apostle says: That He might show in the ages to come the abundant riches of His grace in kindness toward us (Ephesians II, 7). And of whose sweetness it is sung: Taste and see how sweet the Lord is (Psalm XXXIII, 9). And of whose oracles it is again proclaimed:
How sweet are Your words to my palate, more than honey and the honeycomb to my mouth (Psalm CXVIII, 103). And again: The judgments of God are true, justified in themselves, more to be desired than gold and much precious stone, and sweeter than honey and the honeycomb (Psalm XVIII, 11). Who then would suppose that by the good and gentle God man was predestined either to the malice of the will, by which he should forsake the good God, or to the bitterness of obstinacy, by which he should not fear the gentle Lord?
Accordingly, it befits the faithful to believe and confess that the good and just God did indeed foreknow that men would sin, because nothing of things to come could be hidden from Him (for they would not even be future, if they had not been in His foreknowledge); yet that He did not predestine any man to sin, because if God were to predestine a man to any sin, He would not punish the man for his sins. For by God's predestination either the loving remission of sins is prepared, or the just punishment of sins. Never, therefore, could God predestine a man to that which He Himself had appointed both to forbid by precept, and to wash away by mercy, and to punish by justice.
The wicked, therefore, whom God foreknew would end this life in sin, He predestined to be punished with unending torment; wherein, just as the foreknowledge of human iniquity is not to be blamed, so the predestination of the most just retribution is to be praised—that one might recognize that the man whom He predestined to be punished for the deserving of sin was not predestined by Him to any sin whatsoever. CHAPTER XXIV. God predestined the good mercifully to glory, the evil justly to punishment. God did not promise all that He foretold, nor did He predestine all that He foreknew.
God therefore foreknew all the works of men, whether good or evil, because nothing could be hidden from Him; but He predestined only the good, which He foreknew He would do in the sons of grace. The evil future works, however, of those whom He did not predestine to the kingdom but foreknew unto ruin, He foreknew by His most mighty Godhead, and ordered by His provident goodness; and because He was foreknowing that those same evils not only He Himself would not do, but neither would man, insofar as man had humbly cleaved to Him, in this He shows us all the more the insuperable power of His foreknowledge, in that not even in evil things did He permit the predestination of His justice to be idle.
About to show, therefore, what He had foreknown was to be repaid and what to be freely given, God predestined to punishment those whom He foreknew would depart from Him by the fault of an evil will. And He predestined to the kingdom those whom He foreknew would return to Him by the help of preceding mercy, and would remain in Him by the help of subsequent mercy: in the former keeping mercy, in the latter maintaining justice; to the former lovingly bestowing what He promised, to the latter no less justly repaying what He foretold. Thus, however, God did not promise all that He foretold, although He foretold all that He promised. Just as He did not predestine all that He foreknew, although He foreknew all that was predestined.
For He foreknew the wills of men, both good and evil, but He predestined not the evil, but only the good. And although it was not in His predestination that He should have given malice to the human will, yet it was in His predestination what He should render to the malice of the human will. On account of this, because—as the Psalmist testifies—The Lord is merciful and just (Psalm CXIV, 5), He predestined the just to glory, the wicked to punishment. To those, therefore, who were to be justified and glorified, He foretold and likewise promised the predestined work of His mercy. But to the wicked He only foretold the predestined work of His justice; He did not promise it. CHAPTER XXV. On the same argument.
But if anyone should ask why God foretold indeed all things predestined, yet did not promise all things predestined, we answer that there cannot be said to be a promise except when something is foretold as to be done for this end, that once done it may be able to profit him to whom it is promised. And that a promise always belongs to a gift, not always to judgment; since the largess of a promise always gladdens, but the severity of judgment sometimes saddens. Fearing which, the prophet pours out to God a prayer of this kind: Enter not into judgment with Your servant, for in Your sight no living man shall be justified (Psalm CXLII, 9).
For he knew that all would be held bound by an equal chain of condemnation, unless God, in those to whom He willed to show mercy, should exalt mercy above judgment (James II, 13). Justification, therefore, and glorification, which is not to man from man but from God, because it was to profit the saints greatly, was for this reason both foretold and promised. But punishment, which was to harm the ungodly forever, was only foretold, not promised. This is also shown quite easily by the divine testimonies. For in that place of the prophet both are alike found expressed, where God through Isaiah rebukes with these words those who do not serve Him: Behold, those who serve Me shall eat, but you shall hunger.
Behold, those who serve Me shall drink, but you shall thirst. Behold, those who serve Me shall rejoice, but you shall be confounded. Behold, those who serve Me shall exult with gladness, but you shall cry out for sorrow of heart, and shall howl for contrition of spirit (Isaiah LXV, 13). In all these things, whatever pertain to the punishment of the wicked were only foretold, not promised. For it is not to be said that what the severity of iniquity's desert threatens to inflict was promised by the largess of goodness. But whatever pertain to the person of those who serve God were both foretold and promised. Something of this same kind is also in that discourse of our Saviour, in which He says:
Then those shall go into eternal burning, but the just into eternal life (Matthew XXV, 46). He both foretold and promised the reward which the just shall enjoy; but the punishment with which the unjust shall be punished He did not promise, though He foretold it. Nor indeed, just as He predestined the saints to the receiving of justice, did He so predestine the wicked to the losing of that same justice; because the Lord, being merciful and just, could freely deliver from depravity whomsoever He willed; but He was never the worker of depravity, because no one was ever depraved except insofar as he departed from God. Nor did God predestine one to depart, although the divine knowledge foreknew that he would depart. CHAPTER XXVI. God works good out of the evil works of the ungodly.
God predestined the good in one way, the evil in another. The evil are called vessels of wrath, the good vessels of mercy. Why the Apostle rather calls the good vessels of mercy than of justice. God, therefore, although He is not the author of evil thoughts, is nonetheless the orderer of evil wills; and out of the evil work of any evil man He does not cease Himself to work good. Nor in the very works of an unjust will does He abandon the just order of His own works, because even this He holds within that same order, that He justly abandons an evil will.
Yet He so abandons the will departing from Him in its own evil works, that there the good operation of God's permitting is not lacking, while both in the unjust will of the sinner He Himself fulfils justice, and out of the evil by which He judges the sinner He freely bestows a benefit upon whomsoever He wills. In the saints, therefore, the Lord is about to perfect what He freely gave, that they might be good. And what He foreknew He would give, He predestined in the eternal disposition of His goodness. For this is the predestination of God, namely the everlasting disposition of God's future work. Further, in the wicked He is about to punish what He did not give, that they might be evil; nor did He predestine them to any iniquity, because that they should will wickedly, this He Himself was not going to give them.
And because the persevering iniquity of an evil will ought not to remain unavenged, He predestined such persons to ruin, because for such He prepared the punishment of just retribution. This indeed the Lord Himself taught fully by a manifest discourse, in that He showed to have been prepared by Himself not only the kingdom, where the good may rejoice, but also the eternal fire, where the evil may be tormented. For to the good He is about to say: Come, blessed of My Father, receive the kingdom which has been prepared for you from the foundation of the world (Matthew XXV, 34); but to the evil He is about to say: Depart, you cursed, into the eternal fire, which has been prepared for the devil and his angels (ibid., 46).
Behold to what the Lord predestined the wicked and ungodly: namely, to just punishment, not to any unjust work; to penalty, not to guilt; to chastisement, not to transgression; to that ruin which the wrath of the just Judge repaid to sinners, not to that ruin by which the iniquity of sinners provoked the wrath of God against itself. This the prediction of the blessed Apostle makes manifest, who calls the evil, whom God is about to condemn forever, vessels of wrath, not of guilt. For he says: But if God, willing to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience the vessels of wrath fitted for destruction, that He might show the riches of His glory upon the vessels of mercy, which He has prepared unto glory (Romans IX, 22).
I beseech you, most beloved Monimus, that you attend diligently to this passage of the Apostle. For it is known that the wrath of God cannot be spoken of except where the iniquity of man is believed to have gone before. For God could be neither ignorant nor unjust, so as to be able either not to recognize the guilt of the sinning man, or to inflict the judgment of punishment upon one not sinning. For the blessed Paul himself declares that in the iniquity of man the justice of God is commended, so as to show that the wrath of the Almighty is not inflicted unjustly. For he says: But if our iniquity commends the justice of God, what shall we say? Is God unjust, who inflicts wrath? (I speak as a man) God forbid; otherwise how shall God judge the world? (Romans
III, 5). Not in vain, therefore, was such a distinction made by Him between those to be punished and those to be glorified, that He should call the former vessels of wrath, but the latter vessels of mercy, except to show that both in the vessels of wrath and in the vessels of mercy their own iniquity had gone before. For such is the true Lord, whose mercy is both free and whose wrath is not unjust; and through this, He both prevents by His goodness those unworthy ones whom He justifies, and finds worthy of punishment those whom He condemns; and so it may appear that in the vessels of mercy, it is not from themselves but from God that they are good, and in the vessels of wrath, it is not from God but from themselves that they are evil.
For the Apostle could have named those whom he called vessels of mercy rather vessels of justice; but if they were called vessels of justice, perhaps they would be thought to have justice from themselves. But now, when he says vessels of mercy, without doubt he did not keep silent about what they themselves had been, because he clearly shows what has been conferred upon them by God. For if they were just through themselves, the Lord would repay them a wage for their works, not bestow mercy beforehand: just as the same Apostle says in another place: But to him who works, the wage is not reckoned according to grace, but according to debt (Romans IV, 4). The vessels of mercy, therefore, are prepared for an undeserved glory, because they have obtained mercy freely.
Of whom the blessed Apostle himself also testifies that he is one, saying: I who was formerly a blasphemer and a persecutor and injurious, but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief (1 Timothy I, 13). This is the work of God in the vessels of mercy: that to the blasphemers and persecutors and injurious, not the due ruin was repaid, but the free gift of mercy was bestowed. But to the vessels of wrath God would never repay ruin, unless man were found to have sin of his own accord; because neither would God justly inflict wrath upon the sinning man, if the man had fallen into guilt by God's predestination. But because man had the cause of his own iniquity from his own will, therefore Blessed
Paul asserts that God endured with much patience the vessels of wrath, fitted for destruction. This wrath, therefore, for this reason repaid ruin to such vessels, because in them it found the merit of voluntary iniquity. But when would the just Lord have inflicted wrath upon a sinning servant, if the servant had sinned by the Lord's predestination? In this, then, God fitted these vessels, unto that to which He predestined them, that is, unto destruction—that destruction, surely, which Paul declares will suddenly come upon the evil, saying: For when they shall say, peace and security, then sudden destruction shall come upon them (1 Thessalonians V, 3).
But if God predestined such men to sin, the Apostle would not have chosen to call them 'vessels of wrath' but 'vessels of fault,' nor would such vessels be said to be fitted for sin, but rather for perdition. Now, however, they are called 'vessels of wrath' for this reason: to show that in such men what proceeds from God's predestination is not the evil that has been committed by them, but rather what is justly requited to such men. CHAPTER XXVII. How justly God abandons the wicked and repays them with perdition. The unrighteous are predestined to the pool of fire and brimstone. The first death of the soul is in sin, the second in the pool of fire. The Lord does not know the ways of the ungodly, because He did not make them. The first death of the soul is inflicted by man, the second by God. God predestined sins not to be committed, but to be justly punished.
For rightly is perdition repaid by God to the wicked, although the perdition is an evil for those who are now justly abandoned and afterwards justly tormented. For in such men God begins His judgment by abandonment and completes it by torment. For even at this time in which God abandons the wicked as they depart from Him, He does not work in them what displeases Him, but works through them what pleases Him, intending afterwards to repay them what they deserve from His justice. For they will receive their recompense, not because God made good use of their evil works, but because they themselves made evil misuse of God's good works. And so God fitted such men for the intent of punishment, which the just Judge, being the sinner's punisher, decreed by a just predestination.
Not unto sin, which man began not from divine predestination but from his own will, by evil coveting, and completed by evil acting; for concupiscence, having conceived, brought forth sin, and sin when it was consummated begot death (James 1:15). Therefore the unrighteous are not predestined to the first death of the soul, but they are predestined to the second, that is, to the pool of fire and brimstone. Of which blessed John says: And the devil who deceived them was cast into the pool of fire and brimstone (Rev. 20:9). And in another place: And death and hell were cast into the pool of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the pool of fire (Rev. 20:14). Again he says:
But for the fearful and unbelieving and the abominable and murderers and the unchaste and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their portion shall be in the burning pool and brimstone, which is the second death (Rev. 21:8). He calls that the second death which follows from the sentence of the just Judge, not that which went before in the evil concupiscence of the sinner. By which death the Savior declared certain men to be dead, saying: Let the dead bury their own dead (Matt. 8:22). And the Apostle concerning the widow: But she that liveth in pleasures is dead while she liveth (1 Tim. 5:6). To the Ephesians also he speaks thus:
And you, when you were dead in your trespasses and sins, wherein in time past you walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of this air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of unbelief, among whom also we all had our conversation in time past, in the desires of our flesh, doing the will of the flesh and of our thoughts; and we were by nature the children of wrath, even as the rest. But God, who is rich in mercy, for His exceeding great charity wherewith He loved us, even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ (Eph. 2:1-5). Concerning this death by which man is dead in sins, God says:
I desire not the death of him that dies, but that he should turn from his evil way and his soul should live (Ezek. 18:32). But how can it be believed that God predestined man to the death of sin, which He Himself testifies He does not will? Therefore this death of the dying man is his own evil way, which, because it is evil, is unknown to God. For it is written: For the Lord knows the ways that are on the right hand, but those that are on the left are perverse (Prov. 4:27). Therefore the ways which God made He knows; those which He did not make He destroys, because He does not know them. Whence it is written: The Lord knows the way of the righteous, and the path of the ungodly shall perish (Ps. 1:6).
He therefore who knows all things before they come to pass, and whose eyes in every place behold the good and the evil, whose countenance also is upon them that do evil things, to cut off the remembrance of them from the earth (Ps. 33:17), does not know the evil way for this reason: not because anything in the works of men escapes His knowledge, but because He did not make the death of the dying man; yet He justly requites death to the dead man. Therefore the first death of the soul, which man brought upon himself, is the cause of the second death; and the second death, which God repaid to man, is the penalty of the first death.
And because man, being unrighteous, brought this death upon himself unjustly, he received that other death justly from the just Judge, so that, because in this death the improvident sinner willingly sows the seed of iniquity, in that death he unwillingly reaps the fruit of punishment: For he who sows in his own flesh, of the flesh shall reap corruption; but he who sows in the spirit, of the spirit shall reap life everlasting (Gal. 6:8). But he who sows in the spirit, and of the spirit shall reap life everlasting, has from God the gift both of the harvest and of the seed. Which we have learned on Paul's testimony, for thus he says: But He who gives seed to the sower will also furnish bread to eat, and will multiply your seed, and increase the growth of the fruits of your righteousness (2 Cor. 9:10).
But he who sows in the flesh, and of the flesh shall reap corruption, will therefore not rejoice in the harvest, because he had not God but himself as the author in the seed. Thus indeed God foreknew as future all the sins of men in sinners; and because He Himself did not predestine them to be committed, He justly predestined them to be punished by judgment. Which you will surely recognize even in those very words of Saint Augustine that you inserted into your letter, if you consider them, who after saying: 'This good, then, which is to seek after God, there was none that did it, no not one (Ps. 14:3),' straightway continued and added, speaking of that kind which is predestined to perdition, saying:
'For upon this the foreknowledge of God looked, and pronounced its sentence.' Assuredly by these words he has shown quite plainly that God saw the sins of men by His foreknowledge, upon which He dictated the sentence by predestination. For what else ought we to understand in this pronouncing of God's sentence, than the punishment prepared for the sinner? And he is justly predestined to punishment by divine equity who is foreknown as a sinner by divine knowledge; inasmuch as he, of his own will, was going to commit the iniquity to which he was not predestined by God. So that in him in whom God's foreknowledge saw a future unjust work, for him He might prepare a just punishment through the sentence of predestination. CHAPTER XXVIII. It is confirmed from Saint [Augustine].
[From] Augustine, that the cause of no human fault is to be referred to God. Although, then, you yourself and others like you, by your zeal in reading or your quickness in understanding, may most easily recognize from this passage of Saint Augustine's words which you placed in your letter what the catholic understanding holds concerning those whom we hear to be predestined to perdition, nevertheless, lest any of the slower sort should think this one passage insufficient for them in this question, I have inserted certain things from other books of Saint Augustine also, in which he taught that the sole cause of human iniquity is pride, and that men are predestined by God not to sinning, but to damnation; and that the cause of their not being helped by God lies in themselves, not in God.
Thus in the second book On the Baptism of Infants, writing to Marcellinus, among other things he says thus (chap. 17): 'Ignorance therefore and weakness are vices which impede the will, so that it is not moved to do a good work or to abstain from an evil work. But that what lay hidden should become known, and what did not delight should become sweet, belongs to the grace of God, which helps the wills of men; and that they are not helped—the cause of this likewise lies in themselves, not in God, whether they be predestined to be damned on account of the iniquity of pride, or to be judged and instructed contrary to that very pride, if they are children of mercy.' Here immediately Saint Augustine subjoined the testimony of the prophet, saying:
'Whence Jeremiah, when he had said, I know, O Lord, that the way of man is not in himself, neither is it in a man to walk and to direct his steps (Jer. 10:23), immediately subjoined, Correct me, O Lord, but yet in judgment, and not in Thy fury. As if he said: I know it pertains to my correction that I am less helped by Thee, so that my steps may be perfectly directed. Nevertheless, for this very reason do not deal with me as in the fury with which Thou hast determined to condemn the wicked, but as in the judgment with which Thou teachest Thine own not to be proud. Whence it is said elsewhere: And Thy judgments will help me (Ps. 119:175).' And so, instructing the aforesaid Marcellinus with such teaching, Saint Augustine goes on and says:
'Therefore refer the cause of no human fault to God, for the cause of all human vices is pride.' In these words of Saint Augustine, consider, I beg you, my dearest friend. First, that the cause of men's not being helped by God is said to lie in themselves, not in God. Next, that they are said to be predestined to be damned on account of the iniquity of pride, which pertains to judgment, not to be depraved, which pertains to sin. Third, consider also that he admonishes that the cause of no human fault is to be referred to God, because, if any iniquity of the sinner is believed to be predestined by God, the cause of that iniquity would be placed in the divine predestination.
How impious and how contrary to the Christian faith this is, I think escapes no Christian. In another place of the same book also (chap. 19), the aforementioned Saint Augustine says thus: 'For to be lifted up into pride belongs to the proper will of men, not to the work of God. For God neither compels nor helps them to this.' CHAPTER XXIX. Predestination cannot exist without God's foreknowledge, but well the reverse. In sins, it is not the work of God, but His judgment.
And that our assertion may be supported by a clearer proof of his words, we must set down something from the book which he wrote On the Predestination of the Saints, in which he more plainly shows that foreknowledge can exist without predestination, but predestination cannot exist without foreknowledge; and that God foreknew even those things which He Himself does not do, that is, sins. In the aforementioned book, then, this is the opinion of the same blessed Augustine (Book I, chap. 10): 'Predestination is that which cannot exist without foreknowledge, but foreknowledge can exist without predestination. For by predestination God foreknew those things which He Himself was going to do, whence it is said: He made the things that are to come.
But He is able to foreknow even those things which He Himself does not do, such as any sins whatever. For although there are certain things which are so sins that they are also the penalties of sins—whence it is said: God delivered them up to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not fitting (Rom. 1:28)—there it is not God's sin, but His judgment.' I think it is clearly shown in these words of blessed Augustine that God foreknew and predestined His own good works, that is, whether those which pertain to mercy or those which pertain to justice; but that He only foreknew, and did not also predestine, the evil works, that is, sins; because there it is said to be not the work of God, but His judgment. Therefore in sin there is not the work of God, because it was not predestined by Him that the sin should come to be.
But it is His judgment, because that which the wicked man works without God working it is not left unavenged. CHAPTER XXX. The response of Prosper to the fourteenth objection. The response to the fifteenth. The conclusion concerning predestination. But you are also not unaware that in past time, to that most brilliant work of Saint Augustine which he wrote On the Predestination of the Saints, it was objected by certain Gauls that blessed Augustine, in his assertion of divine predestination, said that sinners were predestined not only to judgment, but also to sin; against whose words, because Augustine himself was overtaken by a swift death, Prosper, a learned and holy man, rightly defended the faith in a faithful and copious discourse.
From which chapters of the Gauls, that we may not now set down many things, lest we should seem by our will to make more prolix this little book, which the necessity of disputing compels to be prolix, we have thought fit to insert the passages of two responses. For the fourteenth objection of the Gauls runs thus: 'That those who do not believe the evangelical preaching, do not believe by God's predestination. And that God has so decreed, that whosoever do not believe, by His own ordinance do not believe.' To this perversity, therefore, which was objected against blessed Augustine's words not out of truth but out of malice, Prosper responded with such a discourse: 'The unbelief of those who do not believe the Gospel is by no means generated by God's predestination. For God is the author of good things, not of evil.
God's predestination, therefore, is always in the good, pertaining either to the retribution of justice or to the bestowal of grace. For all the ways of the Lord are mercy and truth (Ps. 25:10). Accordingly, the unbelief of those who do not believe is to be referred not to God's ordinance, but to His foreknowledge. Which foreknowledge did not for this reason impose the necessity of not believing, because it could not be deceived concerning the unbelief which was to come.' The fifteenth objection also is inserted in these words, that foreknowledge is the same as predestination. To which Prosper responded thus: 'He who in no respect distinguishes God's foreknowledge from His predestination, what is to be attributed to God concerning good things, this he strives to ascribe to Him also concerning evil things.
But since good things are to be referred to God, their bestower and co-worker, while evil things are to be referred to the voluntary wickedness of the rational creature, there is no doubt that God, without any temporal difference, both at once foreknew and predestined those things which were to be done with Himself as author, or which were to be repaid by a just judgment to evil merits; but that He only foreknew, and did not also predestine, those things which were not going to have from Him the cause of their operation.' We therefore, dearest friend, have preferred for the present to insert these few things from the books of Saint Augustine and from the responses of Prosper into this little book, so that all might know what they ought to think concerning the predestination of the saints and of the ungodly;
and at the same time, that it may appear that the tenor of our opinion agrees with the words of the same blessed Augustine. Accordingly, since we have sufficiently shown (as I judge) that the unrighteous are predestined not to sin, but to punishment, we ought now to give an end to this volume, so that a balanced division of the books may renew the reader's zeal for more attentively reviewing the disputation of the other questions. BOOK TWO, comprising three questions: one concerning the offering of the sacrifice, another concerning the mission of the Holy Spirit, the third concerning the supererogation of blessed Paul. CHAPTER ONE. A compendious epilogue concerning the predestination of the just and the unrighteous.
Sufficiently, as I judge, my dearest Monimus, has the earlier discourse (in so far as the Lord has deigned to help our littleness) both treated and resolved the question concerning the diversity of the predestination, namely, of the just and of the unrighteous—that is, of those whom the gratuitous mercy of God, going before them, converts by justifying, to glorify them when converted, and of those whom the just severity of God abandons in their sins, to punish them when damned;
so that most people, although they are wont to be not lightly disturbed in this matter, may easily be both instructed by the testimonies of the divine books and informed by the books of Saint Augustine and by the responses of that most learned man Prosper, by which they may recognize that God's predestination is nothing other than the preparation of His works, which in His eternal disposition He foreknew that He would either mercifully or justly perform;
and that, because in sins neither mercy nor justice is found, therefore all the evil will of the unrighteous, by which they sin, was foreknown, but was nevertheless not predestined by God, since they would not have had that same evil will otherwise than in this, that they were going to withdraw from the Lord. Nor did God predestine man's withdrawal from Himself, since the cause of that withdrawal was the wholly voluntary turning-away of the sinner. Which, because it did not lie hidden from God as future, found in His eternal foreknowledge the penalty of just retribution prepared for it. CHAPTER II. The second question of Monimus concerning the sacrifice of the body and blood of Christ. Heretics, blinded by their own malice, tear apart the Trinity both in substance and in the veneration of the Father.
A question concerning the faith of Abraham to be prefaced. Now therefore, with the Lord's help, let the intention of our disputation be directed to investigating the remaining questions. You say that you were questioned by some concerning the sacrifice of the body and blood of Christ, which very many suppose is offered to the Father alone. This too you assert to be, as it were, the crowning interrogation of the heretics. But it is nothing new that heretics, deprived of the light of truth, should think that they will overcome the truth by those very propositions by which they are most easily overcome: For their glory is unto their own confusion who mind earthly things (Phil. 3:19). Pursuing this, therefore, the heretics seem to propose to themselves as it were crowning and invincible those things whence they do not see confusion impending over them.
But when they are overcome by the truth, this is certainly fulfilled in them, that from that wherein they glory, thence they are confounded. It is no wonder, therefore, if those whom their own malice (as it is written) has blinded, whom the Truth itself (which is the true Light) has forsaken, and whose squalid gaze of a perverse heart the darkness of foul error has hedged about, do not doubt to preach the inseparable Trinity as unequal by a substantial diversity, and consequently strive impiously to tear it apart by an office of unequal honor. And since they are convicted of sinning against Wisdom itself, the word of that same Wisdom is fulfilled in them, that while they sin against it, they admit the sin of impiety into their own souls;
for thus Wisdom herself says: But those who sin against me wrong their own souls; and all who hate me love death (Prov. 8:36). For how do they not hate the Son of God, whom indeed they cannot deny in words to be the Only-begotten, yet distinguish Him from the nature of the Father by an inconsiderate perversity? Or how do they not act impiously against their own souls, who neither consent to glorify the Only-begotten Son of God, namely the true God, together with the Father, nor permit Him to be honored equally by one and the same sacrifice? To whom, with God's help (in so far as the sequence of the present work allows), briefly responding, we preface this interrogation, that they may say:
Whether God gave to His Church that faith by which our father Abraham, believing God, was well-pleasing, and in which he received that all the nations of the earth were to be blessed in his seed; or whether they profess that some other rule of religion was divinely handed down to them, so that they should reckon that the faith of the patriarchs and prophets is to be renounced. And although (as the truth has been demonstrated) they are held in every way strangers to this faith, yet they say it was given to the Church, and contend that it remains inviolate among themselves. CHAPTER III. The question of the sacrifice is determined from the faith of the fathers. The promises made to Abraham and to his seed. Abraham built an altar to sacrifice not to the Father alone, but also to the Son. To invoke in the name of the Lord is the same as to invoke the name of the Lord.
Abraham built an altar to that God who appeared to him. An invincible argument against the heretics from the sacrifice and faith of Abraham. Since, then, the question of the sacrifice is disputed between us and them, we must have recourse to those fathers whom God, like luminaries in the world, glorified by the token of true faith for our instruction; whose faith He deigned to show to be inspired by Himself, so that He is found most evidently to name Himself their God, saying: I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob: this is My name for ever, and My memorial unto generation and generation (Exod. 3:15).
Since therefore we say that the sacrifice is offered not to the Father alone, but at once as one thing to the Father and the Son, while they suppose it is offered to the Father alone, let us seek in the sacrifice of the patriarchs the token of a true immolation pleasing to God. From him, therefore, must our series of proofs be begun, in whose seed is found the future blessing of all nations promised, as Paul says: To Abraham were the promises made, and to his seed. He said not, And to seeds, as of many, but as of one: And to thy seed, which is Christ (Gal. 3:16). And again: That the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles in Christ Jesus, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith (Gal. 3:14).
Let it therefore be altogether known that those are partakers of the divine blessing and sharers of spiritual grace who are found to be followers of Abraham's faith in the sacrifice. In the book of Genesis we read: The Lord God appeared to Abraham, and said to him: To thy seed will I give this land. And Abraham built there an altar to the Lord, who appeared to him, and departed thence to the mountain over against the east of Bethel, and built there an altar to the Lord God; and he invoked in the name of the Lord God, who appeared to him (Gen. 12:7-8). Let the heretics now choose what they will, so that either they confess that the Father appeared to Abraham, or they certainly consent that the altar was built by Abraham to the Son;
but that the altar was built for no other reason than to offer sacrifice to God, the reading of the Old Testament frequently intimates. For Moses speaks thus concerning Noah the just: And Noah built an altar to God, and as though it were asked for what reason the just man built that altar, he continued and added: And he took of all the clean beasts, and of all the clean fowls, and offered a victim upon the altar to God (Gen. 8:20). It is clear, therefore, that holy Abraham also, the faithful friend of God and the father of the faithful nations, for this reason built an altar to the God who appeared to him: that he might be able to offer Him the sacrifice of a fitting immolation.
But lest, when he is said to have invoked in the name of the Lord God, anyone should suppose that one God was invoked in the name of another God, since to invoke in the name of the Lord God is nothing other than to invoke the name of the Lord God, divine Scripture took care to show this too by an evident manifestation; for a little after it is said thus: And Abraham was very heavily laden with cattle, and with silver, and with gold, and he went thither, whence he had come, into the wilderness as far as Bethel, to the place where his tent had been before, between Bethel and Ai, to the place where he had made the altar at the first, and there Abraham invoked the name of God (Gen. 13:2-4).
It is therefore recognized that to invoke in the name of the Lord God was this, which is to invoke the name of the Lord God. Wherefore let the heretics say whether they think Abraham built the altar to the Father or to the Son; for whosesoever altar he built, His name assuredly he invoked. But he built the altar to none other than the God who appeared to him, whom the heretics are wont to call the Son: for, striving to teach that a diverse substance befits the Father and the Son, they suppose that all the visible forms of corporeal things—which the most omnipotent Deity, mistress of all creation, as she willed and knew to be fitting to temporal places and persons, adapted for making Himself known to men—are to be assigned to the Son alone;
thence asserting the Son to be unequal to the Father and inferior, because His nature could have been capable of changeable forms. And as though His divinity were by nature visible in that respect, in that He did not disdain to show Himself by visible things to the weak minds of men. Concerning which matter we need not dispute in this work, since the intention of the present question demands only this: that, because holy Abraham is recognized to have sacrificed to that God whom divine Scripture testifies appeared to him, they should either say that the Father appeared to Abraham, or consent that Abraham sacrificed to the Son. For by either horn, as by a twice-sharpened sword, the assertion of their nefarious diversity is cut down;
for if they say the God Father appeared to Abraham, so as to assert that the sacrifice was immolated to Him alone, then in that respect wherein He is asserted to have appeared, the invisible Father is not to be preferred to the invisible Son; but if the Son appeared, and the holy patriarch offered the sacrifice to Him, then the Son is in no respect to be preferred to the Father; for neither would Abraham offer the sacrifice to Him, if he had believed any other more excellent than He. And thus these men, who by the impulse of this question think that our faith is to be shaken, must needs in both cases acknowledge the falsehood of their credulity (or: unbelief). And would that, recognizing it, they might cast it away, and, humble and at peace, now return in a wholesome way to the true faith which they vainly assail as rebels!
For Abraham, who built an altar not to another God, but to Him who appeared to him, so that they may be convicted according to what the heretics hold, either saw the Father or sacrificed to the Son. CHAPTER IV. Isaac too built an altar to the God who appeared to him. Jacob likewise, being commanded, built an altar to the same God. The sacrifices of the patriarchs agree with ours, which are made to the whole Trinity. This God who appeared to Abraham, and to whom Abraham, for no other purpose than to offer sacrifice, built an altar, Isaac too saw, and to Him, holding fast to his father's faith, built an altar. For it is written concerning Isaac (this the book of Genesis contains): And he went up thence to the well of the oath, and the Lord appeared to him
in that night, and said to him: I am the God of Abraham thy father; fear not, for I am with thee, and will bless thee, and will multiply thy seed for Abraham thy father's sake. And Isaac built there an altar, and invoked in the name of the Lord (Gen. 26:23-25). Without doubt of that Lord who appeared to him and promised the help of His presence, and the gift of blessing, and the increase of a multiplied seed. Jacob too is recognized to have made an altar not to another God, but to Him who appeared to him. And what is more, he did not seize upon this of his own accord, but fulfilled it in obedience to divine precepts. Which holy Scripture testifies in these words: And God said to Jacob:
Arise, go up to the place of Bethel, and dwell there, and make there an altar to God, who appeared to thee when thou didst flee from the face of Esau thy brother (Gen. 35:1). And afterwards it is said: And Jacob came to Luz, which is in the land of Canaan, that is Bethel, he and all the people that were with him, and he built there an altar, and called the name of that place The House of God; for there God appeared to him when he fled from the face of his brother Esau (Gen. 35:6-7). Behold, in the mouth of two and three witnesses the word of our faith stands firm; behold, with the sacrifice of the friends of God the oblation of the catholic Church wholly accords, which so sacrifices to the Father that it sacrifices at once to the whole Trinity;
For the holy patriarchs also, when they were bidden to offer sacrifice to the Son, knew that they were rendering to the Father and to the Son alike the homage of pleasing service. It was enjoined upon them by God that they should build an altar to the Son, not because sacrifice was not to be offered to the Father, but that what was immolated by the saints might be immolated to the Son and to the Father alike; not that the Son should be set before the Father, but lest the Begotten should be thought in any way to be ranked after the Begetter. Accordingly, though no one may doubt that the rightness of our faith is confirmed by the witness of the patriarchal sacrifice, whoever with hardened heart reckons that it must be resisted goes astray, an alien from the faith and the fellowship of the saints;
and we could weave in testimonies from the prophets too, of no lesser firmness and strength, were it not that, mindful of the whole debt we owe, we prefer to hasten as swiftly as possible to the solution of the remaining questions as well. CHAPTER V. Another testimony from the Prophets, that sacrifice is offered to the Son also. The obduracy of the heretics who do not sacrifice to the Son. Catholics offer to the whole Trinity, even if they name the Father alone. Nevertheless, lest anyone under the guise of abundance should suppose that we have concealed a poverty of defense,
we shall bring forward one testimony from the prophets, by which it may plainly be shown that the holy prophets, divinely inspired, foretold by a sure and most faithful prophecy that in the time of the New Testament also spiritual victims should be offered by the faithful not to the Father only, but also to the Son. For Zephaniah says: Wait for me, says the Lord, unto the day of my resurrection, in the time to come, for a testimony; for my judgment shall be upon the gathering of the nations, that I may receive kings and pour out upon them the wrath of my fury;
for in the fire of my jealousy shall the whole earth be consumed, for then I will restore to the peoples a language among their generations, that all may call upon the name of the Lord and serve him under one yoke; from beyond the river of Ethiopia I shall receive those who observe me, who have been scattered; they shall bring victims to me in that day (Zeph. III, 8). What, I ask, is clearer than this prophecy? Or what hiding-place of dark obstinacy can heretical unbelief discover, whereby it might escape the light of so great a manifestation? Since the Lord has so set his tabernacle in the sun (Ps. XVIII, 6) that there is none who can hide himself from his heat.
For if anyone, benumbed by the icy cold of unbelief, hides himself, he can withdraw from himself the aid of propitiation, but he cannot conceal himself from vengeance. Behold, he who commands himself to be awaited on the day of his resurrection, he himself shows that victims are to be offered to him by all the nations; that it might be recognized that that sacrifice is acceptable to God which the pure and suppliant devotion of the faithful offers in common to the Father and the Son. Warned by these and suchlike testimonies, would that the heretics might hear, not with deaf ears, but recognize the truth of the faith by the illumination divinely granted to them, so that, receiving the saving light, they might henceforth cease to wander in the darkness of deadly unbelief.
They who do not offer sacrifice with the Son, and who by wretched obduracy fall away from the faith of the patriarchs and prophets, impiously offending, show themselves condemned by their very selves. For by an apostolic pronouncement every heretic is known to have been condemned by this sentence: that a heretic, after a first and second admonition, is by all means to be avoided (Tit. III, 10), because such a one is not only perverted, but is even condemned by his own judgment.
But if any catholic believers have hitherto seemed ignorant of this mystery, they ought henceforth to know that every homage of honor and of saving sacrifice is rendered by the catholic Church alike to the Father, to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, that is, to the abiding Trinity. And it is manifest that in the one name of this Trinity holy baptism too is celebrated. For no prejudice is created against the Son or the Holy Spirit when the prayer is directed by the one offering to the person of the Father. Its consummation, since it embraces the name of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, shows that there is no distinction within the Trinity. For while the word of honor is directed to the person of the Father alone, by the faith of him who rightly believes the whole Trinity is honored:
and when the intention of him who offers is directed to the Father, the gift of the sacrifice is offered to the whole Trinity by one and the same act of him who offers. Therefore, while we offer one sacrifice to the Trinity, who is the one and true God, let us not be moved by the empty objections of the heretics, since to follow this and hold it most firmly we are both instructed by the oracles divinely proclaimed and strengthened by the examples of the saints who went before. CHAPTER VI. Mommus's third question: why in the sacrifices the sending of the Spirit alone is besought. The Holy Spirit is not therefore less because he is sent by the Father and the Son, for the Son also is sent. The sending of the Son and of the Holy Spirit is not made locally.
Scripture teaches the immensity not only of the Father, but also of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Now, then, we must also revisit that question concerning the sending of the Holy Spirit, namely: why, if sacrifice is offered to the whole Trinity, only the sending of the Holy Spirit is besought for the sanctifying of the gift of our oblation, as though (so to speak) the Father himself, God, from whom the Holy Spirit proceeds, could not sanctify the sacrifice offered to him; or as though the Son himself could not sanctify the sacrifice of his own body, which we offer, seeing that he himself sanctified his own body which he offered, in order to redeem us;
or as though the Holy Spirit had to be sent to consecrate the Church's sacrifice, as if the Father or the Son were absent from those who sacrifice. First, then, it behooves us to remember that in this word 'sending' the Holy Spirit is to be received neither as lower nor as lesser; for if lesser, then surely inferior, and if inferior, then surely lesser. Now we have given this warning beforehand, knowing that it is very often objected by the heretics against our faith, that the Holy Spirit is therefore to be believed lesser than the Father and the Son because he is sent both by the Father and by the Son.
But further, if the one who sends is to be believed greater than the one sent, let them recognize that in this their perfidy is refuted, because just as the Holy Spirit is read to be sent by the Father and the Son, so also the Son is found sent by the Father and the Spirit. This the Son himself both said through the prophet, long before he was sent, and after he was sent confirmed it by his own testimony. For coming into Nazareth and entering the synagogue, when the book of the prophet Isaiah had been handed to him to read, he unrolled that passage where it is written: The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, wherefore he anointed me; to preach the gospel to the poor he sent me (Luke IV, 18); and having given back the volume, he testified that the truth of that prophecy was fulfilled by its present effect, saying:
Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your ears (Luke IV, 21). But in another passage of the same prophet he shows that he was sent by the Lord and by his Spirit, in these words: And now the Lord has sent me, and his Spirit (Isa. XLVIII, 16). And that the Holy Spirit is sent by himself to the disciples he declares in this manner, before his passion: But when the Paraclete has come, whom I will send you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he shall bear witness of me (John XV, 26). And earlier he had taught that this same Spirit is sent also by the Father, saying: But the Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things (John XIV, 26).
The Son, therefore, is sent by the Father and by the Spirit, and the Spirit is sent by the Father and the Son. Nevertheless, no Christian ought to take the sending of the Son or of the Holy Spirit as made locally, but by that name of 'sending' let us understand the work of a manifestation graciously granted. For thus the Son was not sent locally, nor is the Holy Spirit sent locally, just as neither is there a local coming of the Father himself. Yet the Son promises to those who love him not only his own coming, but also the Father's; for he says: If anyone loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our abode with him (John XIV, 23).
As therefore the Father and the Son are indeed nowhere absent, and yet come to whom they will (for they come by grace, who by power are nowhere absent), so also in the sending or coming of the Holy Spirit no local motion of his is to be received, but the effect of our sanctification is to be believed. For if the Son was sent locally according to his Deity, or the Holy Spirit is thought to be sent locally, then God the Father too will be believed—which be far from us—to be enclosed in a place. And where then is that whereby God himself thus intimates to us his own immensity, saying: I fill heaven and earth (Jer. XXIII, 24)? The immensity of the Son too the prophetic word commends to us. Of whom holy Jeremiah speaks thus:
He is great and has no end; lofty and immense (Baruch III, 25). And because he himself is the power and wisdom of God, of him surely it is said: He reaches from end to end mightily, and orders all things sweetly (Wisd. VIII, 1). By apostolic preaching too we hold it established that in Christ all things were created in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through him and in him, and he is before all things, and all things hold together in him (Col. I, 16). What then is there that he cannot fill with his presence, in whom the Apostle declares all things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, to hold together!
Of the immensity of the Holy Spirit too Scripture speaks thus: The Spirit of the Lord has filled the whole world (Wisd. I, 7). Wherefore David also, believing in his heart unto righteousness the one substantial immensity of the holy Trinity, nay rather confessing it with his mouth unto salvation, sang thus: Whither shall I go from your Spirit, and whither shall I flee from your face? If I ascend into heaven, you are there, and if I descend into hell, you are present. And if I take my wings before the dawn, and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea, even there your hand shall lead me, and your right hand shall hold me (Ps. CXXXVIII, 7). CHAPTER VII. The whole Trinity is everywhere. By the name 'Spirit' the spiritual gifts of grace are sometimes signified.
Since therefore, as we have said, the whole Trinity remains by the unity of its Deity naturally immense and infinite, and is thus nowhere locally, yet nowhere absent, and is so wholly everywhere that it can neither be divided in parts among the parts of the whole creation, nor be enclosed by the totality of the whole creation—as often as the Holy Spirit is asked of the Father to consecrate the sacrifice, this is the first principle of faith, the first caution to be held healthfully by all Christians: that a local coming of the Holy Spirit be by no means imagined or supposed. For the Apostle says to the faithful: Do you not know that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwells in you (I Cor. III, 16)? And in another place:
Praying at all times in the Spirit, and watching in him (Eph. VI, 18). And the Savior himself says to his disciples: If you love me, keep my commandments, and I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Paraclete, that he may abide with you forever, the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him; but you shall know him, because he will abide with you and will be in you (John XIV, 15). Whence Paul also proclaims that we have received this same Spirit of adoption, saying: For you have not received the spirit of bondage again unto fear, but you have received the Spirit of the adoption of sons, in whom we cry, Abba, Father (Rom. VIII, 15).
To the faithful, therefore, who are the temple of God, and in whom the Spirit of God dwells, nay rather who are the temple of the Holy Spirit—as the Apostle says: Do you not know that your members are the temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have from God (I Cor. III, 16)?—to whom also the same apostle commands that they should pray in him and watch in him: how is the Holy Spirit believed to be sent, as though previously absent? Since no one can even worthily pray and watch unless the Holy Spirit has poured himself into him. Wherefore, as the Apostle says, comparing spiritual things with spiritual (I Cor.
II, 13), and in the Spirit, who is by nature God, thinking nothing corporeal, nothing temporal, nothing local, nothing mutable, we ought to consider that by the name of the Holy Spirit the gifts of spiritual grace are sometimes designated. For we read in the book of Kings: When Elijah was to be translated by divine gift, and had given his disciple, before he was taken up, confidence to ask whatever he wished, that one asked that the spirit which Elijah had received might be granted to him twofold. Where surely we understand that by the name 'spirit' the gift of spiritual grace is designated.
For the substance of the Holy Spirit can neither be increased nor diminished, who, just as he is everlasting without beginning and without end, so is he perfect without increase or decrease. CHAPTER VIII. The gifts of the Holy Spirit in us can be increased or diminished, but not the Spirit himself. Just as the same sun illumines different things more or less, so also the same Spirit is received in diverse ways by diverse persons. Yet his gifts, according to his own inscrutable and irreproachable will, just as we believe they can be increased in men, so we do not deny they can be diminished in them. For since the gifts of the Holy Spirit are charity, joy, peace, long-suffering, goodness, kindness, faith, modesty, continence (Gal. V, 22);
and since to one is given through the Spirit the word of wisdom, to another the word of knowledge according to the same Spirit, to another faith in the same Spirit (I Cor. XII, 8)—yet all these things can both be increased and diminished in men. Whence comes that in which the apostles themselves ask that an increase of faith be granted to them from the Lord, saying: Lord, increase our faith (Luke XVII, 5). That we grow in charity too the blessed Apostle himself demonstrates, who says: But doing the truth, let us grow in charity in him through all things (Eph. IV, 15). But how do we grow in charity, unless by the gift of spiritual grace we receive an increase of charity? For the charity of God is poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given
to us (Rom. V). This is understood of the other spiritual gifts too, which, according to each one's capacity, are said to be either increased or diminished in us. For the increases and decreases of such charisms are spoken of according to this, that in some they are present more or less, not that they can in themselves be either increased or diminished. For the sun is as great when it is seen by healthy eyes as when it is seen by injured ones; nor is it itself diminished when it is perceived less by troubled eyes, nor increased when it is poured more abundantly into healthy eyes. For that diversity of vision comes not from a diversity in the sun, but consists in the diversity of health and infirmity.
And although it illumines one thing less and another more, it nevertheless has in itself one and the same light, which one sees less and another more. So also, while the Holy Spirit remains unchangeably in himself without increase or decrease, Elisha asked for himself a twofold spirit—in that he asked for an increase of spiritual grace. CHAPTER IX. Who are said to have spoken in the tongues of angels. Those who teach the law and do not do it. Where charity is, there is the Holy Spirit. When therefore the coming of the Holy Spirit is besought to sanctify the sacrifice of the whole Church, nothing else, it seems to me, is besought than that, through spiritual grace, in the Body of Christ (which is the Church) the unity of charity may be perpetually preserved unbroken.
For this is the principal gift of the Holy Spirit, without which whoever speaks with the tongues of men and of angels can, like sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal, give a sound, but cannot have life. Though he have all prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge, though he have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not charity, he is nothing. Though he distribute all his goods to feed the poor, and deliver his body to be burned, but have not charity, it profits him nothing (I Cor. XIII, 1, 2, 3). For because the Apostle says the law was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator (Gal. III, 19), they spoke in the tongues of angels who taught in their mouths the things of the law,
yet by their depraved works waged war against the law. Of whom the Savior himself says: What they say, do; but what they do, do not do; for they say and do not (Matt. XXIII, 3). Saul too had prophecy, and Simon Magus believed and received the sacrament of baptism; for the demons also, while they believe and tremble, seem to have faith, but it profits them nothing, because they have not charity. Many too, distributing their goods to the poor, because they took no care to expend zeal on acquiring charity, indeed gave away their possessions, which profited them nothing for this reason, that they lost themselves by not acquiring the charity which they ought to have acquired.
By these tokens, therefore, it is shown that the Holy Spirit is there where the end of the commandment is, that is, charity out of a pure heart, and a good conscience, and faith unfeigned (I Tim. I, 5). But where charity together with faith is not, whatever gifts there may be of the Holy Spirit, the Holy Spirit himself cannot be there; and through this the abundance of those gifts profits nothing where some gift of the Spirit is so had that the Spirit himself is not had. Accordingly, such persons, though they seem partakers of certain paternal gifts, are yet not sharers of the paternal inheritance, since the Holy Spirit is the pledge of our inheritance (Eph. I, 14).
And in this our God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, according as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and unblemished in his sight in charity. CHAPTER X. Rightly, therefore, does the Church in the sacrifice beseech the coming of the Holy Spirit. By the incarnation of Christ there is peace and unity for us with God. Through the Holy Spirit Christ was born and the Church reborn. Christ and the Church. Through the Holy Spirit there is unity of Christ and the Church. Through the Holy Spirit we are built up in Christ into a holy temple in the Lord.
While, therefore, the Church beseeches that the Holy Spirit be sent to her from heaven, she beseeches that the gift of charity and unanimity be conferred upon her by God. And when could the holy Church (which is the body of Christ) more fittingly beseech the coming of the Holy Spirit than for the consecrating of the sacrifice of the body of Christ?—she who knows that her very Head, according to the flesh, was born of the Holy Spirit. For thus is Mary instructed by the angelic word: The Holy Spirit shall come upon you, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow you; therefore also that which shall be born of you holy shall be called the Son of God (Luke I, 35).
The evangelist Matthew too, filled with the same Holy Spirit, affirms that when his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Spirit (Matt. I, 18). And to Joseph he relates that the angel said in a dream: Joseph, son of David, fear not to take Mary your wife, for that which is born in her is of the Holy Spirit. But what was accomplished by the mystery of that dominical incarnation, save that things divided might be united, and things at variance be made at peace? For Paul is witness concerning Christ: For he is our peace, who made both one and, breaking down the middle wall of partition, the enmities in his flesh;
abolishing the law of commandments contained in ordinances, that he might make in himself the two into one new man, making peace, that he might reconcile both in one body to God, slaying the enmities in himself through the cross; and coming, he preached peace to those who were far off, and peace to those who were near, for through him we both have access in one Spirit to the Father (Eph. II, 14). This, then, was done by divine charity, that from the very Spirit the body of that Head might be reborn, of whom that Head himself was born. And for this reason it is necessary for us that, just as Christ was born of the Holy Spirit—when God the Only-begotten, the union of man, came forth as a bridegroom from his chamber in the womb of the Virgin—
so the Church, by the gift of the Holy Spirit, should cleave to Christ, as a wife to her husband, and as a body to its head. For the Apostle says: For Christ is the head of the Church, he the savior of the body. And again: For we are members of his body, of his flesh and of his bones; for this cause a man shall leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and the two shall be one flesh (Eph. V, 29). Expounding which he added: This is a great sacrament; but I speak in Christ and in the Church. This testimony of the Old Testament the Lord, when he brought it forth against the temptings of the Pharisees, followed up and joined: Therefore now they are no longer two, but one flesh.
Therefore what God has joined together, let not man put asunder (Matt. XIX, 6). That therefore in that holy wedlock, which was accomplished in the chamber of the virginal womb, they should now be not two, but one flesh, was done by spiritual grace. That this too may be held perpetually unbroken, spiritual grace works; because that this unity of the body may cleave to its head, and that, knowing that all who withdraw themselves far from him shall perish, and that he will destroy all who commit fornication away from him, it may itself chastely and sweetly say: But for me it is good to cleave to God (Ps. LXXII, 27). And again: My soul has cleaved close after you (Ps. LXII, 9). That charity of God works it, which is poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us (Rom. V, 5).
Through this Holy Spirit so great is the unity of Christ and the Church, that the Vessel of election, though he says: For Christ is the head of the body, the Church (Col. I, 18), yet does not hesitate to call that very body of Christ truly Christ. Thus indeed he says, writing to the Corinthians: For as the body is one, and has many members, but all the members of the body, though they be many, are one body, so also is Christ (I Cor. XII, 12). And to show that this body, which is so Christ's that it is Christ, though it has many members, remains and consists one only by the grace of the Holy Spirit, he immediately adds, saying: For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Gentiles;
whether bond or free; and we were all made to drink of one Spirit (I Cor. XII, 13). That spiritual grace, therefore, through the unity of peace and charity, does not cease day by day to build up the body of Christ, which in the womb of the Virgin Mary fashioned the gift of wisdom, which is the head of this body. Whence the blessed Apostle shows that we too are built up in him, in these words: Therefore you are now no longer strangers and foreigners, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and of the household of God, built up upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the chief cornerstone; in whom all the building, being framed together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord, in whom you also are built together into a habitation of God, in the Spirit (Eph. II, 19).
This building, by which we are built up in the Spirit, the Apostle testifies in another place is made for no other purpose than for the perfecting of the saints unto the work of the ministry, unto the building up of the body of Christ. Where, intimating the unity of that same spiritual building, which consists in charity, he says: Until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, that we may no longer be little ones tossed about, and carried about by every wind of doctrine, in the wickedness of men, in craftiness unto the circumvention of error.
But doing the truth in charity, let us grow up in him in all things, who is the head, Christ, from whom the whole body, fitted and joined together through every joint of supply, according to the working in the measure of each single member, makes the increase of the body unto the building up of itself in charity (Eph. IV, 13). CHAPTER XI. This spiritual building is most rightly sought when the bread and cup are consecrated. Yet our sanctification is effected by the whole Trinity. Those who withdraw from the unity of the Church lose the Holy Spirit. This spiritual building of the body of Christ, therefore, which is done in charity (namely when, according to the word of blessed Peter,
living stones are built up into a spiritual house, into a holy priesthood, to offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ [I Pet. II, 5])—this spiritual building, I say, is never sought more opportunely than when by the very body of Christ (which is the Church), in the sacrament of the bread and cup, the body and blood of Christ themselves are offered: For the cup which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? and the bread which we break, is it not the partaking of the body of the Lord? for we, being many, are one bread, one body, and all partake of the one bread (I Cor. X, 16). And therefore we ask that, by that same grace by which it came about that the Church was made the body of Christ, by that same grace
it may come about that all the members of charity, the joining remaining, may persevere in the unity of the body. And we worthily ask that this be done in us by that gift of the Spirit who is the one Spirit both of the Father and of the Son; because the holy natural unity and equality and charity of the Trinity, which is the one only and true God, sanctifies by unanimity those whom it adopts. For in that one substance of the Trinity, there is unity in the origin, equality in the offspring, and in charity the communion of unity and equality; there is no division of that unity, no diversity of that equality, no weariness of that charity:
for there nothing disagrees, since the equality is dear and one, and the unity is equal and dear, and the charity is equal and one, naturally and unchangeably enduring. Since therefore from that very communion (if it may be so said) of the Holy Spirit the one charity of the Father and the Son is shown—which communion the blessed Apostle commends with such a word: The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the charity of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all (II Cor., last chapter, 13); and in another place: If there be any consolation of charity, if any communion of the Spirit (Phil. II, 1)—for this reason it is said: For the charity of God is poured out in our hearts, through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us (Rom. V, 5). For the Holy Spirit;
He who is the one Spirit of the Father and of the Son works this in those to whom He grants the grace of divine adoption. This He wrought also in those who are found in the third book of the Acts of the Apostles to have received the same Spirit. Of them it is said: 'Now the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul' (Acts 4:32); for the Spirit who is the one Spirit of the Father and of the Son, and who together with the Father and the Son is one God, had made of the multitude of believers one heart and one soul in God. Hence the Apostle too anxiously says that this spiritual unity is to be preserved in the bond of peace, admonishing the Ephesians thus:
'I therefore, the prisoner in the Lord, beseech you that you walk worthily of the vocation in which you are called, with all humility and meekness, with patience, supporting one another in charity, careful to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace: one body and one spirit' (Eph. 4:1-4). This Spirit they lose by departing, whoever, whether corrupted by treachery or puffed up by pride, are separated from the unity of the body of the Church. Jude the Apostle plainly shows such men to be without this Spirit, saying: 'These are they who separate themselves, sensual, not having the Spirit' (Jude 19). For because they are sensual, therefore they do not have the Spirit. On which account the Apostle Paul says:
'The sensual man does not perceive those things that are of the Spirit of God' (1 Cor. 2:14). Such men, then, are prone to division, because they do not have the Spirit, in whom alone the members of Christ preserve unity spiritually and dear. Whence it is manifest that among all heretics there is not the grace of the Holy Spirit, nor can their sacrifices, so long as they are heretics, please God, nor is the sanctification of spiritual grace bestowed upon the sacrifices of those who offer while cut off from the unity of the ecclesiastical body: for God delights in the sacrifices of the Church alone, which sacrifices spiritual unity makes to God:
1:194
unde (ubi) etfideiveritasnullamcreditinTrinitatedistantiam, etpacistenacitasfraternamservatincariialeconcordiam. CAPUTxn. CaritasDeidiffuxaestincordibusnostrisperSpiritumsanctum. QuiadunitatemEcclesiæredeunt, exhibentsehostiamvivamDeoplacentem. Nequisautemnosputet. dumEcclesiainsacrificiipreceSpiritussanctideposcitadventum, incongruesanctiSpiritusvocabulocaritatemintelligere, quædiffusaestincordibusnostrisperSpiritumsanctum, quidatusestnobis, commodumduximuspaternisdefinitionemnostrampremuniresententiis. SanctusenimAugustinusinlibrisdeBaptismo (lib. III, cap.
whence also the truth of faith believes no distance in the Trinity, and the tenacity of peace preserves fraternal concord in charity. CHAPTER 12. The charity of God is poured forth in our hearts by the Holy Spirit. Those who return to the unity of the Church present themselves as a living victim pleasing to God. But lest anyone think that we, when the Church in the prayer of the sacrifice begs the coming of the Holy Spirit, unfittingly understand by the name of the Holy Spirit that charity which is poured forth in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who is given to us, we have deemed it fitting to fortify our definition with the sayings of the Fathers. For Saint Augustine, in the books On Baptism (book 3, chapter
16), when he was treating the question of the reception of heretics without the repetition of baptism, in the third book of that same work says among other things thus: 'But that the Holy Spirit is said to be given in the Catholic Church alone through the imposition of hands, our forefathers doubtless wished to be understood in this way, that the Apostle says: For the charity of God is poured forth in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who is given to us (Rom. 5:5). For this is that charity which those do not have who are cut off from the communion of the Catholic Church.'
Consider, I pray, most blessed Augustine, divinely instructed in the holy Scriptures, how in one place he wonderfully opened up, under the name of the Holy Spirit, the meaning not only of the holy Apostle Paul but also of the holy Apostle Jude. For he says above: 'But that the Holy Spirit is said to be given in the Catholic Church alone through the imposition of hands, our forefathers doubtless wished to be understood in this way, that the Apostle says: For the charity of God is poured forth in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who is given to us.' And then afterward Saint Augustine expounded, with the ambiguity of doubt removed, what the Apostle Jude had set down in his Epistle. For Jude the Apostle says:
'These are they who separate themselves, sensual, not having the Spirit.' And blessed Augustine, concerning the charity of God which is poured forth in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who is given to us, says: 'For this is that charity which those do not have who are cut off from the communion of the Catholic Church.' Or will anyone say that it is one thing for the Holy Spirit to be given by the imposition of hands to returning heretics, and another thing for it to be bestowed divinely by the spiritual sacrifice?
But whoever thinks or says this assuredly does not yet understand how those present themselves as a living, holy victim, pleasing to God, if any of the schismatics and heretics, forsaking their deadly error, return to the unity of Catholic truth; where, offering to God the sacrifice of a contrite spirit, they themselves are a living, holy victim, pleasing to God. For through the contrition of a humbled heart they return into the unity of the members of that Priest who loved us, as the Apostle says: 'And He offered Himself for us, an oblation and a victim to God for an odor of sweetness' (Eph. 5:2).
But that they may return and become a spiritual sacrifice, the charity of God accomplishes it, which is poured forth in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who is given to us. Therefore God willingly accepts the sacrifice of Catholic truth and communion alone: because, while He preserves in her His charity poured forth by the Holy Spirit, He makes the Church herself a sacrifice pleasing to Himself, who ever begs to receive from Him the grace of spiritual charity, through which she begs continually to present herself as a living, holy victim, pleasing to God. CHAPTER 13. The fourth question of Monimus, concerning the supererogation of the Apostle. The exposition of blessed Ambrose, book 7 on Luke, chapter 4. The exposition of blessed Optatus, before the middle of the sixth book. You write, moreover, concerning that passage of the Apostle where he says:
'But concerning virgins I have no commandment of the Lord; yet I give counsel' (1 Cor. 7:25). Which counsel, in the letter which I lately wrote to you, I noted as pertaining to that where the faithful innkeeper, having received two denarii from the Lord, gave more (supererogated) (Luke 10:35). The sense of this passage, although you assert it was not so put by Saint Augustine, you nevertheless confirm that other illustrious men set it down thus. It is indeed true: for Saint Augustine said that this was supererogated by the Apostle, that whereas according to the precept he might, if he wished, live of the Gospel, he chose rather to labor with his own hands not only for himself, but also for those who were with him, as he truly said to the Ephesians: 'You yourselves know that' (or
'how') these hands ministered to my necessities, and to them that were with me. I have shown you all things, how that so laboring you ought to support the weak (Acts 20:34-35). For also writing to the Thessalonians, he says: 'For you remember, brethren, our labor and toil, working night and day, lest we should be burdensome to any of you' (1 Thess. 2:9); for also to the Corinthians he calls this his reward, that preaching the Gospel he may put the Gospel without charge, that he abuse not his power in the Gospel (1 Cor. 9:18).
Since, then, Saint Augustine had set this down fitly and suitably, it ought nevertheless not to seem unfitting or unsuitable that Saint Ambrose placed blessed Paul's supererogation either in his sermons and epistles, or in the excessive labor of mind and body. But Saint Optatus of Milevis, in the sixth book against Parmenianus, testifies that Paul supererogated in giving counsel concerning virgins, in these words: 'For virginity is a matter of the will, not of necessity. In short, that innkeeper, the Apostle Paul, to whom the people, wounded and pierced by the wounds of sins, was entrusted, had received two denarii which he might spend, namely the two Testaments. These, through teaching, he expended as it were for costs.'
'He taught how married Christians ought to live; and when he was asked what he would enjoin concerning virgins, he answered that concerning virgins nothing was commanded to him (1 Cor. 7:25). He confessed that he had expended the two Testaments, that is, the two denarii. The costs were in a manner exhausted, but he who had entrusted the wounded man had promised that he would repay whatever more he might expend upon the cure beyond the two denarii spent. Paul expends not precepts but counsel toward virginity. It is neither a hindrance to the willing, nor does it drive or compel the unwilling.' CHAPTER 14. Behold, one passage of the Apostle has been expounded in three ways by three holy men. Nay more, the same passage is found expounded in diverse ways by one and the same doctor.
The varied exposition of Augustine concerning Noah's ark. It is useful to adduce diverse meanings about one thing, but not a diverse faith. Since, then, this passage of the blessed Apostle has been expounded in a threefold manner by the three holy men whom we have named, whoever sets down one of these three modes does not at all dissent from the truth; nor is it necessary that what is understood in manifold ways should in all writings be inserted in manifold ways. For the holy men themselves, by whose ministry God deigned to open the secrets of His Scriptures, said very many things not in one way only, but in manifold ways, provided only that, without offense to the true faith, they may be understood not unbecomingly.
for while the Manichaean asserted that in the books of the Old Testament nothing is prophetically contained concerning Christ's future coming in true flesh, that same most blessed Augustine, showing our Old Scripture to be full of prophetic significations concerning Christ and for this reason divinely inspired, thus among other things expounds this, that God commands the aforementioned ark to be built with two and three stories, so that in the fifteenth book On the City of God he unfolded the mystical explanation of the same passage in two other ways, not with the learned words of human wisdom, but truly (as the Apostle says) in the teaching of the Spirit, no less sweetly than wonderfully.
That this may be more easily recognized, I will append the words of both works, as they were set down by him. Therefore against Faustus he set down these things: 'That the inner parts of the ark are built with two and three chambers is because the Church gathers, out of all nations, either a twofold multitude, on account of the circumcision and the uncircumcision, or a threefold one, on account of the three sons of Noah, by whose progeny the world was replenished.'
But in the fifteenth book On the City of God, having set himself, as the occasion of the passage allowed, to expound the sacrament of the aforementioned ark, after some remarks, in that which is said, that the ark of Noah ought to be built with two and three chambers, he made mention of that exposition which is contained in the books against Faustus the Manichaean, adding subsequently these words: 'And it may indeed be that someone else may expound these things more aptly than we, provided only that the things which are said be all referred to this City of God of which we speak, sojourning in this malignant world as in a flood, if he who expounds them does not wish to stray far from the meaning of him who wrote them:
for example, as if someone should wish that what is here written, You shall make its lower parts with two and three chambers, be understood not as I said in that work, namely that the Church is gathered out of all nations, and is called two-chambered on account of the two kinds of men, that is, the circumcision and the uncircumcision, whom the Apostle also names in another way, Jews and Greeks (Gal. 3:28); but three-chambered, because all nations were restored from the three sons of Noah after the flood. But let someone say something else, which is not foreign to the rule of faith. For since He willed the ark to have dwellings not only
in the lower parts, but also in the upper, and called these two-chambered, and in the uppermost of the upper, and called these three-chambered, so that from the bottom upward a third dwelling should rise, there can here be understood also those three which the Apostle commends: faith, hope, charity (1 Cor. 13:13). There can also, much more fittingly, be understood those three fruitfulnesses of the Gospel, thirtyfold, sixtyfold, hundredfold, so that in the lowest may dwell conjugal chastity, above it widowed, and higher than this virginal; and if anything else can be understood and said according to the faith of this City.
This too I would say concerning the other things which are here to be expounded, that even though they are discussed not in one way, they are nevertheless to be recalled to the one concord of the Catholic faith.' Again, the same blessed Augustine in the first book On the Trinity (chapter 3) asserts that it is useful for many books to be made by many authors in a diverse style, though not in a diverse faith, even concerning the same questions, so that the matter itself may reach many, to some in this way, to others in that. If, therefore, those things which blessed Augustine, concerning Noah's ark, set down in two ways in one place, be each taken up by two men and set down each in its own place, will not each be worthily pronounced a keeper of the truth;
provided nevertheless that each so seems to build up the one of these that is set down in his own words, that the other, which he sets down in his own words as equally suited to the truth, he as a peaceable man rather approves than as a contentious man attacks. CHAPTER 15. The answer to Monimus's question concerning the supererogation of Paul. Wherefore, dearest one, although that meaning which was set down by me is perhaps not found in the sayings of Saint Augustine, it is nevertheless found most plainly set down in the books of Saint Optatus (as you yourself know together with me).
Nor is it hidden from your prudence that of those things which are found set down by the holy Fathers—who defended the right rule of the Catholic faith in the teaching of the Holy Spirit in diverse ways, whether in their expositions or in their defenses—whatever is set down by us, we so build up the meaning suited to the truth of that passage, that we do not deny our assent to other sayings of the Fathers equally suited to the truth. For one does not depart from the truth if, in this supererogation of the Apostle, whether what Saint Ambrose, or what Saint Augustine, or what Saint Optatus held, be held also by us with the truth of faith preserved.
Since, if it is worthily believed that, having received the two denarii, Paul supererogated something in that, preaching the Gospel at the cost of his own labor, he did not exact the stipend owed him by the faithful; it is worthily believed also that he supererogated something in that, concerning virgins, he had not a commandment of the Lord but gave counsel. Both, without doubt, he had by the bounty of Him from whom, unless he had received it, he could not supererogate. THIRD BOOK. ON THE TRUE EXPOSITION OF THAT EVANGELICAL SAYING: AND THE WORD WAS WITH GOD. CHAPTER 1. Praise of charity. The argument of the third book against the Arians, upon that saying: And the Word was with God. The Arians think that 'with God' is something other than 'in God.'
As often, most beloved Monimus, as the power of charity is considered and weighed by the servants of Christ, it is found no less wonderful than sweet. For who would not marvel at it, or who would not be greatly delighted by it, whose burden, when it is borne, does not weaken the mind by weariness, but strengthens it by eagerness? For it, even when it burdens, uplifts, and in a wondrous manner does not allow him whom it burdens to be crushed, nor him whom it uplifts to be exalted. This charity, while with the Lord's help I was paying you the debt I had passed over, again makes me a debtor. For already, of the four questions which you had sent me to be treated, with the help of Him who gives wisdom to little ones, I had completed two books, desiring to render to you what I owed.
So suddenly the report of a certain Arian assertion grazed my ears, which is begotten by an invention the more useless in proportion as it is found to be foreign to all understanding, not only of the divine Scriptures, but even of human nature itself. For I learned that they were now sowing (or inserting, or seeking) a certain unwonted question about the beginning of the Gospel according to John; namely, that they think what is said, 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God' (John 1:1), is to be so understood and expounded that they judge this very Word to be with the Father, not to be in the Father, but to be understood as outside the Father:
so much so that a certain one of them (as far as I learned by hearing, when about these two prepositions, that is, 'in' and 'with,' a dispute arose among them one day) took a cloak, and holding it in his hands, asked whether it was in him, since that cloak which he himself held was with him. And thence, as if to confirm his opinion, he closed his discourse with this definition: that when something is said to be in us, it is to be understood as within us; but when it is said to be with us, it is to be taken as outside us. And because that cloak which he himself held was so with him that it was not in him, and thereby, from the fact that it was with him but yet not in him, it was outside him, not within him:
in the same way the Word of God also (which is God) is indeed to be believed to be with the Father, not to be in the Father, and for this reason not to be one with the Father in substance: since whatever is so with someone that it is not in him, is assuredly so with him that it cannot be of one substance with him. This is their reasoning, contrary to reason. This is their legal disputation, intolerably hostile to the law of God. CHAPTER 2. It is absurd to dispute about God according to corporeal things. The example of the breath of the nostrils would have been more fitting than that of the cloak in the hands.
Hence, by Christ's gift, my mind was stirred to write something, lest the hearing of little ones be disturbed by venomous discourses; for it pertains to the office of our servitude to prepare, against the nascent pestilence of any deadly opinion, the wholesome remedies of the divine words. And so, since the holy Apostle anxiously forewarns the faithful, saying: 'Beware lest any man deceive you by philosophy and vain deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the elements of the world, and not according to Christ: for in Him dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead corporeally' (Col.
2:8-9), these men on the contrary not only, following the error of worldly philosophy according to the elements of the world in time past, thought that one must dispute concerning God, but were so forgetful of all religion, that when they dispute concerning God, they do not attend even to the very elements of this corporeal world: and thus, while they obstinately close the eyes of the understanding even against the things that are seen, they never behold the invisible things of God, understood by the things that are made. For what more absurd can be said than that, when one disputes concerning God, he should take the proofs of his disputation only from the grosser bodies?
For that man seemed to himself to have discovered something great, when, having taken a cloak and held it in his hands, he asked whether, just as it was with him, so it was in him. Then, wishing to teach that as the cloak is with the man, so the Son is with the Father, so that, just as the cloak can be with the man but yet cannot be in the man, so the Son may indeed be with the Father, but may not be in the Father. I ask, if he was pleased to take something from these tangible bodies as an example in disputing—although the elements, which were made by the truth, could in no way aid him as he disputed against the truth—nevertheless, that he might seem to say something tolerable, to be silent about the rest, why did he point to the cloak which he held in his hands,
and did not at least attend to the breath which he drew through his nostrils? For if that cloak could be said to be with him and not in him, yet this breath, which we draw from the air, when we perceive it by breathing, is both with us and in us: and whatever of it we render back by breathing out, when we have rendered it, we have it neither with us nor in us. Or will he perchance say that the element of that air, when we take it in by breathing, is only in us, not also with us? Let him say, then, when it can be with us—is it when we render it back, and do not have it in us? But this I think he will not dare to say even about that cloak, if indeed he rendered it back to him from whom he had received it. For he sees that he had it with him when he received it;
but after he rendered it back, it ceased to be with him. For just as it came about by receiving that what he did not have he might have with him, so it came about by rendering back that what he had with him he might not have. Accordingly, if he said that the cloak is not in him but is with him, yet this breath, which we in turn take from the surrounding air and render back, seems to me that he will not say is not with a man when it is in the man, because then the man has it both with himself and in himself, when he takes it in by breathing. But when he renders it back by breathing out, he has it not with himself, just as neither does he have it in himself. CHAPTER 3. It is therefore false that the Word which is with God is outside God, not in God. It is the height of absurdity that we should be interior to God, but the Word exterior.
Another absurdity, that the creature be set before the Maker. A yet greater absurdity follows, that the creature be of one nature with the Creator. In vain, therefore, in that disputation, concerning that which is said, 'The Word was with God,' did he wish to assert that what is in someone is to be always interior, but what is with someone is to be always exterior, whereas the breath received into the body is so in the man that it is with the man. And again, rendered back from the body, it is so not with the man, just as it is not in the man. For he attended less to this, that he was striving to assert by an absurd proof, than to how a graver absurdity would subsequently hold him entangled. For indeed, when it is said: 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.'
If everything which is with God is exterior, and everything which is in God is interior, what remains for that most skilled disputant, except to contend that we are more excellent than the Son of God? For the Apostle says of God: 'For in Him we live, and move, and are' (Acts 17:28). And in another place: 'One God the Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him' (1 Cor. 8:6). Now then, whoever he is who, under the Christian name, does not fear to dispute so rashly against Christ, when he hears that the Word is with God, and that we are in God, let him, if he dares, say that the Word is exterior and we interior. But if he thinks this must be said, let him pass judgment upon his own sayings;
for in such discourse no other judge is to be sought, since he who says this is assuredly to be blamed by himself. What again will he reply against that saying of the same blessed Paul, in which he says of God: 'For of Him, and through Him, and in Him are all things; to Him be glory forever, amen' (Rom. 11:36)? Behold, Paul testifies that all things are of God, and through God, and in God; but the Word is recognized to be with God by the preaching of John the Evangelist. But if, according to the Arians' notion, everything which is in God is interior, and everything which is with God is exterior, since the Arian believes the Word, which is with God, to be not in God but exterior:
it remains that that which is with God should be declared inferior to all the things which are in God: and this once admitted (since it is written of the Word: 'All things were made by Him'), this will be, according to the Arians, the rectitude of faith, that the creature should be set before the Maker. Who now does not perceive into what precipice improvident men fall, who, resisting the true faith, strive to defend perfidy? For what else is effected by such words, than that, by the defense of this opinion, the creature—forgetful of its own condition and redemption—should dare not only to equal itself to the Son of God, but even to prefer itself? But I marvel how those by whom this is asserted do not consider how much worse a fruit of unspeakable blasphemy is born of it.
For they say: 'That which is in God is to be believed to be interior; but that which is with God is to be esteemed exterior. Wherefore, if that which is with God and is exterior is not to be believed to be of one nature with God, it follows that that which is in God and is interior is to be believed to be of one substance with God.' To this conclusion, therefore, is this reasoning led: that just as the Word, on account of the fact that it is with God, is separated from His nature; so the creature, on account of the fact that it is in God, is believed to be of one nature with God. Whence they are convicted of holding those things by which they dare to prefer us even to the Son, and endeavor to equal us to the Father. Thus they confound everything who dissent from the truth. Behold by what sentences the unfaithful error is asserted.
Behold by what inventions the truth of faith is assailed. CHAPTER 4. 'They said within themselves, thinking not rightly.' To say 'within oneself' is the same as to say 'inside oneself.' Likewise it is the same to say 'inside oneself' and to think 'within oneself'; finally, it is the same to think 'within oneself' and to think 'in one's heart.' But by whatever battering-rams the heretics strive to shake the holy Church, we are certain concerning the Lord our God, that they will not be able to overthrow the city set upon a mountain. Nay rather, they utterly overthrow and destroy themselves, who exasperate the true God, the only Son of God, with insulting assertions. Nor do they refrain from injury even to the Father, while they render ingratitude to the grace of the Saviour.
Wherefore it seems fitting that the understanding of this word be sought from other passages of the Scriptures, so that it may appear whether whatever is said to be with someone we ought, according to their opinion, always to esteem exterior. In the book of Wisdom we read it said of certain men: 'They said within themselves, thinking not rightly' (Wisd. 2:1); of this passage we demand from the Arians a reason: whether he who thinks within himself thinks inside himself or outside himself—since the thought of man is not only not outside the body of man, but is not even an action of the body.
For truly, since that very thing which is called thought is found not only not outside a man, but not even in the man's body itself, who does not see that thought belongs to the soul alone, to which the power to think has been divinely given through the faculty of reason? Indeed, in a man the mind rules when it thinks, but when it acts the body renders its service. There is thought given to a man where the discernment of good and evil has been implanted. It is therefore the interior man who performs the office of thought, who also, created in the image of God, received the power of understanding. When, then, a man thinks within himself, he thinks not outside himself but within himself; whereas he would not be thinking outside himself even if thought pertained to the exterior man.
How much more, then, does he think within himself, seeing that it is not the exterior man but the interior man that thinks. And yet, according to the testimony of Scripture, he is said to think 'with himself,' which surely is found to be the office not of the exterior but of the interior man. For Scripture says, as has already been set down above: 'They said with themselves, thinking not rightly.' But what is it to say 'with oneself,' if not to say in one's heart? For which reason it is said elsewhere: 'The things you say in your hearts, be sorry for them upon your beds' (Ps. IV, 5). This, then, is to say 'with oneself,' which is to say within oneself.
Hence that Pharisee also, who had invited the Lord to dine, when a sinful woman came in and bathed the Savior's feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair, he who was thinking within himself was surely also saying within himself what he was saying by thinking. For the evangelist says: 'But the Pharisee who had invited him, seeing this, said within himself, saying...' (Luke VII, 39). For what is 'he said within himself' but 'he thought within himself'? Yet by the teaching of Scripture we know that he who thinks within himself thinks with himself. Therefore it is indeed said: 'They said with themselves, thinking not rightly.'
But lest the Arians should wish to join this phrase 'with themselves' not to the preceding clause but to the following one, so that it be read not 'they said with themselves,' but 'they said,' and afterward be added 'thinking with themselves'—let them also hear from this the testimonies of the divine Scriptures, and let them recognize that the office of human thought pertains not to the exterior but to the interior man. The evangelist says that when a paralytic was brought before the Lord, 'the Lord, seeing the faith of those who had let him down through the tiles, said: Take heart, son, your sins are forgiven you; and behold, certain of the scribes said within themselves: This man blasphemes. And when Jesus saw their thoughts, he said: Why do you think evil in your hearts?' (Matt.
IX, 5; Mark II, 4, 5; Luke V, 18, 19)? Those whom the evangelist said had spoken within themselves, these the Lord says had thought evil in their hearts. But what is it to think evil in one's heart, if not to think 'with oneself' not rightly? However, then, the Arians may distinguish the sense of this passage, they must necessarily find there the confusion of their own perversity. And would that they might be so confounded by their error that they might be converted to the truth. For if they say that this verse of Scripture is to be divided thus—that which is written, 'They said with themselves, thinking not rightly'—so that they join the very phrase 'with themselves' to the preceding clause, distinguishing it thus:
'They said with themselves,' so that afterward they add 'thinking not rightly'—they are at once refuted by the words of David, that 'to say with oneself' is nothing else than 'to say in one's heart.' For he says: 'The things you say in your hearts' (Ps. IV, 5). But if they wish to distinguish it otherwise, so as to join the phrase 'with themselves' not to the preceding clause but to the following one, so that, having put first 'they said,' with a silence interposed, they afterward bring in what was said, 'With themselves thinking not rightly' (Wisd. II, 1)—let them from this too hear the rebuke of the Savior, and acknowledge that thought belongs to the heart; for he says: 'Why do you think evil in your hearts?' (Luke V, 22). In another place also the same Lord teaches: 'For out of the heart come evil thoughts' (Matt. XV, 19).
And again he says: 'For a good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth good things, and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart brings forth evil things' (Matt. XII, 35). Do they not now recognize in how great an error they are entangled, who strive to assert that the Word is 'with God' outwardly and not inwardly? CHAPTER V. His memory is known both with God and with men. I will come in to him, and we will come to him and make our abode with him. Thus the Word is both with God and in God. Thus the same is in God, and with God there is no iniquity. One and the same Spirit was in Moses, David, and Paul. Again, in the same book we read this written concerning wisdom: 'For the memory of her is immortal, because she is known both with God and with men' (Wisd. IV, 1).
But how is she known with men, if she is not within men but outside men? Since unless she has entered into the soul of a man, she cannot be known to a man. For of her it is thus said: 'And remaining in herself she renews all things, and throughout the nations she conveys herself into holy souls' (Wisd. VII, 27). And that it may not be understood to be anything other to convey herself into souls than to enter into souls, again the text of holy Scripture recalls this concerning her: 'She delivered a righteous people and a blameless seed from the nations that oppressed it. She entered into the soul of the servant of the Lord, and stood against dreadful kings in portents and signs' (Wisd. X, 15). This entrance of hers, whereby she enters into souls, she also intimates in the Apocalypse of John, saying:
'Behold, I stand at the door and knock: if anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him, and I will sup with him, and he with me' (Rev. III, 20). By this entrance the Father and the Son come to the one who loves them, and make their abode with him: as the Son himself says: 'If anyone loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our abode with him' (John XIV, 23). But if the Father and the Son, coming to him with whom they make their abode, are not within but outside, let it be told us where they come to him and make their abode with him? Meanwhile that Christ dwells inwardly in his faithful ones, we have learned by Paul's preaching, who says:
'That Christ may dwell by faith in your hearts, in the inner man' (Eph. III, 17). Or perhaps they will say that Christ dwells by faith in our inner man in one way, and comes with the Father to make his abode with the one who loves him in another way—so that Christ meanwhile could dwell alone in our inner man, while the Father, remaining outside the one with whom he makes his abode, not only could not himself remain within, but could even prevent the Son by the fellowship of his coming from being able to dwell in the inner man. The Son of God likewise promised the Holy Spirit to his faithful ones, that he might remain with them and be in them. For he says:
'If you love me, keep my commandments, and I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Paraclete, that he may remain with you forever, the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see him nor know him; but you will know him, because he will remain with you, and will be in you' (John XIV, 15-17). Behold, with those with whom he remains, in them is the Holy Spirit. Let it be told, then, what difference there can be here between his remaining with them and his being in them? For in one place both prepositions are used, and to the Holy Spirit is assigned the possibility of both things, that with those with whom he remains, in them he may be. Is it then that the Holy Spirit so remains with the faithful that he can be in the faithful themselves,
yet the Word who is God is so 'with God' that it cannot be in God? What shall I say to those who desire so to argue from the Scriptures that they in no way seek the way of spiritual understanding, and, turning their eyes away from the true light, delight to wander perpetually in darkness? That to be 'with God' is this very thing which is to be 'in God,' holy Scripture shows in other places also. For Moses says: 'A faithful God, in whom there is no iniquity, just and holy is the Lord' (Deut. XXXII, 4). David also sings: 'For the Lord our God is just, and there is no iniquity in him' (Ps. XCI, 16). And the apostle Paul says that there is no iniquity with God. For thus he says: 'Is there iniquity with God? By no means' (Rom. IX, 14).
Let the Arians choose in this place what they will, and, that they may plainly display their wisdom, let them pass judgment on the sayings of the Law, the Prophets, and the Apostles. Moses says: 'A faithful God, in whom there is no iniquity.' David also says: 'The Lord our God is just, and there is no iniquity in him.' Paul indeed says: 'Is there iniquity with God? By no means.' Either, then, let them confess that the apostolic sense agrees with the legal and prophetic sense, or let them say that the apostle Paul disagrees with the legal and prophetic understanding. Paul the apostle indeed says that he has the same spirit of faith which blessed David had, and which holy Moses also received, as he himself testifies, saying:
'But having the same spirit of faith, as it is written: I believed, therefore I have spoken; we too believe, therefore we speak' (2 Cor. IV, 13). But how did they have one spirit of faith, if concerning the faithful God they held differing views? Great, however, is the diversity of understanding, if what Paul says—that there is no iniquity 'with God'—differs from what Moses and David say—that there is no iniquity 'in God.' And if, though Paul says he has the same spirit of faith which the prophets also had, there is a differing sense in their faith, then the Apostle is declared a liar (which God forbid), he who testifies that Christ speaks in him? For he says: 'Do you seek a proof of Christ speaking in me?' (2 Cor. XIII, 3).
But since Christ truly spoke in Paul, Paul surely is no liar. And since, when he says he has the same spirit of faith, he does not lie, each sense is found to be in agreement: so that what Moses and David said—that there is no iniquity in God—is this, which Paul also says: that there is no iniquity with God. But if perhaps it seems to them that they say something contrary, this remains for them: to contradict either the prophets or the Apostle. CHAPTER VI. With whom there is no change. Many examples where 'with' is put for 'in.' And although the opinion of the heretics is known to be refuted by so many and so great testimonies, and to rest on no truth, let them nevertheless answer what they think of that passage of the apostle James, where he says:
'Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no change, nor shadow of turning' (James I, 17). But with whom there is no change, there is assuredly no mutability; and with whom there is no mutability, there is immutability. Let them say, then, whether this immutability, which is 'with God,' is outside or inside; for if it is inside, behold, this is what it is to be 'in God,' namely to be 'with God.' Let them therefore cease to think perversely, and hasten to consent to catholic rectitude. But if this immutability, which is with God, is believed to be not inside but outside, then assuredly it is not believed to be in God.
And if immutability is not believed to be in God, then consequently God himself is proclaimed mutable. And lest they dare (or wish) to assign this to the Son, let them hear that in the same passage the Father of lights is named. Accordingly, when we hear that 'with God there is no change,' let us understand this according to the truth of the catholic faith, namely that there is no change in God. And when it is said, 'The Word was with God,' let us understand nothing other than 'The Word was in God'; and when Wisdom says in the Proverbs, 'I was with him arranging' (Prov. VIII, 30), let us understand nothing other than 'I was in him arranging.' And when it is said to God, 'With you is the fountain of life' (Ps. XXXV, 10 [al. III, 5]), let us understand nothing other than 'In you is the fountain of life.' And when John says:
'We announce to you eternal life, which was with the Father, and was made manifest to us' (1 John I, 2)—let us understand nothing other than eternal life which was in the Father: for truly the Word God is with God, because the Word God is in God. And truly with the wise God is wisdom, because in the wise God is wisdom. And truly with the living God is life, because in the living God is God the life. And truly with the true God is God the truth, because in the true God is God the truth. And truly with the strong God is God the power, because in the strong God is God the power. But what wonder is it, if for the Son to be with the Father is this very thing which is for him to be in the Father, since indeed, naturally born of the Father, he remains always in the Father—
since even concerning men we read (as far as pertains to the substance by which they are naturally men) that it is nothing other, when something is said to be with them, than to be in them? Whence we shall bring forth most manifest testimonies. In the book of Isaiah is contained the prayer of King Hezekiah, which he poured out to God after fifteen years had been added to his life, where among other things he says thus: 'My spirit is made with me, like a weaver drawing near to cut off the web' (Isa. XXXVIII, 12). But what else is here understood by 'My spirit is with me,' if not 'My spirit is in me'? Or shall it here too be said that the spirit of a man is with a man, but is not in the man? Whereas the Apostle plainly says:
'For who among men knows the things of a man, except the spirit of the man which is in him?' (1 Cor. II, 11). But also that which we set down above as written—'They said with themselves, thinking not rightly' (Wisd. II, 1)—what else is it than 'they said within themselves'? Again, in the book of Wisdom it is said: 'Thinking these things with myself, and pondering in my heart, that immortality is in kinship with wisdom' (Wisd. VIII, 17). What one thinks 'with oneself,' this one ponders in one's heart; and in saying both, one surely showed that that thought and that pondering are present in oneself not outwardly, but inwardly. It is also said in the Proverbs:
'My son, let not evil thought lay hold of you, which forsakes the teaching of youth, and has forgotten the divine covenant; for it has placed its house with death, and its axles with the underworld among the earth-born' (Prov. II, 16). If, then, the evil thought which has placed its house 'with death' is outside death, not in death, then surely it lives. And if, placed 'with the underworld,' it is not in hell, it remains that that which is neither in death nor in hell should be said to have life in heaven. For this reason it is said to God: 'Because you have snatched my soul from death' (Ps. CXIV, 8), because he granted life to the soul through faith, saying: 'But my just one lives by faith' (Rom. I, 17). And again for this reason it is said to him:
'You have snatched my soul from the lower hell' (Ps. LXXXV, 13), because souls are snatched from hell by the grace of God for this purpose, that they may dwell in the heavens. Whence the Apostle says: 'But our citizenship is in heaven' (Phil. III, 20). Further, how has the soul, which through evil thought was 'with death,' been freed from death, if it was not in death? And how has it been snatched from hell, if, though set 'with the underworld,' it was not in hell? Since surely, if it were not in death, it would not have been dead. And through evil will, that is, through sin, who does not know that the soul dies? Since God says: 'The soul that sins, it shall die' (Ezek. XVIII, 20).
It is certain, therefore, that the soul which thinks evil, when it is 'with death,' is in death, and when it is 'with the underworld,' is in hell. What of the fact that the Savior also says: 'The things which are impossible with men are possible with God' (Matt. XIX, 26; Luke XVIII, 27)? Shall we then say that all things are possible with God in such a way that this very possibility, which we say is 'with God,' we should say is not 'in God'? But what power does God have 'with himself,' if he does not have that very power in himself? CHAPTER VII. Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father is in me? The Word is with God, as the word is in the mind.
By these and testimonies of this kind it is clear that, when it is said, 'The Word was with God,' nothing else ought to be understood than 'The Word was in God.' For the Son himself, who is the Word God, testifies that not only is the Father in him, but that he too is in the Father, saying: 'Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father is in me?' (John XIV, 10). But this being of the Son 'with the Father,' and his being 'in the Father,' should not be regarded as such as when one man is with another man, whether by right of hospitality or by the affection of charity. For the apostle Paul also says that he remained with the apostle Peter fifteen days (Gal.
I, 18), namely by the right of hospitality and by the purity of love; and although through the unity of faith and charity their soul was one and their heart one, yet Paul did not so remain with Peter as the Word remains with God, because a man cannot be with a man as the Word God is with God the Father: for a man is so with a man that not only can he be not with him, but also, when he is with him, he cannot substantially be in him. For truly he who is so with another is outside him, because when he is with him, in sincerity of love, he is separated by place, however greatly each is joined to the other in affection. But the Word is so with God as the word is in the mind, as counsel is in the heart:
for when the mind has a word with itself, it surely has it by thinking, because to say 'with oneself' is nothing other than to think 'with oneself.' When, then, the mind thinks, and by thinking generates a word within itself, it generates the word out of its own substance, and so generates that word out of itself that it may have what is begotten with itself. Nor does the word which is born from the mind have anything less than is the mind from which it is born, because as great as is the mind that generates the word, so great is also the word itself. For as the word is born from the whole mind, so it remains, once born, within the whole.
And because, when the mind thinks, there is no part of it where the word is not, therefore the word is as great as is the mind itself from which it is; and when it is with it, it is in it, and what the mind itself is, this is the word which is from it and in it; and as great as it is, so great also is the word, because it is from the whole and in the whole. And the word itself is as great as is at once the mind itself together with the word, for the word is not so born from it as to be locally separated from it.
For that birth, which shows what it is and from what it is, itself shows that it cannot be outside that from which it was born, nor be in any respect less, but so be from it that it is with it and in it, and be as much from it as it is in it, and as much in it as it is with it. CHAPTER VIII. We are not in God as the Word God is in God. God begot us in one way, the Word in another. The blasphemies of the heretics against the Son of God. And indeed Scripture says in a certain manner that we too both are in God and are with God, but not in the way in which the Word God, who is the only-begotten Son, is with God and in God: for it is said of us that in God we live and move and are. And it is said to God himself: 'If we have not sinned,
we know that we are counted as with you.' Yet when this is said of us, our natural unity with God is not shown, but either the power of the Creator is understood, or the mercy of the Redeemer. For we who believe are so in God and with God as, being born of God, we are sons of God. For it is written: 'Beloved, now are we the sons of God' (1 John III, 2). And again: 'Of his own will he begot us by the word of truth' (James I, 18). We, then, God begot by the word of truth, but that Word he begot as the truth. To us he gave the power to become sons of God; but he was made Son of God not out of power, but is born naturally of God as the Son of God. Us God begot of his own will, because will preceded the generation;
but in the generation of the Only-begotten, no will of the one generating preceded, where without beginning the eternal nativity remains natural. As, then, we have been begotten, but not as the only-begotten God; and we are sons of God, but not as the one and true Son; and we are gods, but not as the Word, who is the true God: so we are in God, and we are with God, but not as the Word God, who is naturally born of God, is with God and in God:
for although he is called Son and we are called sons, and he is God and we are gods, and he is begotten and we are begotten, yet there is a great difference in reality in that which seems to sound as one in name; because he, in that he is God, that he is Son, that he is Only-begotten, is so naturally, because he is born of the nature of the Father; but we, in that we are gods, that we are sons, that we are begotten, are so not by nature but by grace, because whereas we did not have it in our nature that we could be this, it was freely given to us that we should be made this. If the heretics, God mercifully granting it, should perceive this distinction, they will see the true light and will refrain from the insults against the only-begotten Son:
for they not only detract from him in that which is 'with God,' but also strive to deny in him a human soul. The Son of God himself designated these men in a single verse of a psalm, saying: 'This is the work of those who detract from me with God, and who speak evil against my soul' (Ps. CVIII, 20). For who detracts more grievously from Christ 'with God' than he who, hearing that the Word God is with God, says that the same Word is not in God? Or who speaks more evil against Christ's soul than he who denies a human soul in Christ?
since that Word, which is God, is so with God, of whom he is, that through the unity of nature he is in God, and through the same unity of nature he is one God with him; and that soul, together with the flesh, was assumed by the only-begotten God, so that at once in Christ both our soul and flesh might be saved. From whom, without doubt, that man will obtain everlasting salvation who has recognized in him the full truth of the divine and human nature.