📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 反亞流神學文集

反亞流神學文集 第 13 章 第 1/11 段

拉丁文原文.37 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 13:1–13:37(全章共 388 節)

← 第 12 章第 14 章 →
下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
13:1
EX LIBRO I. DE UNO ALTISSIMO, PARACLETO, NUNTIO, DOCTORE ET JUDICE. 577 FRAGMENTUM I. Filius et Deus est, et altissimus, et vita ut Pater: eadem quoque cum Patre, et similiter facit. Miror autem, cum ex illis nominibus atque operi- bus, pro tuo libitu, Filii et Spiritus sancti merita metiaris, quomodo non etiam nomina illa operaque consideres, quibus Patris et Filii una celsitudo natu­ ralis ostenditur. Nam dum dicitur : In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum (Joan. i, 1); in nibilo nomen Filii a nomi­ ne Patris minus esse cognoscitur; cum sicut Pater, ita et Filius, Dei nomine non privatur.
取自第一卷。論那獨一至高者、保惠師、使者、教師與審判者。斷片一。聖子既是神,又是至高者,也如聖父一樣是生命:祂也與聖父作同樣的事,並以同樣的方式行事。但我甚為詫異,你既然憑己意從那些名稱和作為衡量聖子和聖靈的功德,怎麼卻不也思想那些顯明聖父與聖子本性上同一崇高的名稱和作為呢。因為當經上說:「太初有道,道與神同在,道就是神」(約一1)時,聖子的名毫不遜於聖父的名;因為聖子如同聖父一樣,並不被剝奪神的名。
FROM BOOK I. CONCERNING THE ONE MOST HIGH, THE PARACLETE, THE MESSENGER, THE TEACHER, AND THE JUDGE. FRAGMENT I. The Son is both God, and the Most High, and life as the Father: he also does the same things, and in like manner, with the Father. But I marvel that, since from those names and works you measure, according to your pleasure, the merits of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, how you do not also consider those names and works by which the one natural loftiness of the Father and of the Son is shown. For when it is said: 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God' (John 1:1); the name of the Son is known to be in no way less than the name of the Father; since, as the Father, so also the Son is not deprived of the name of God.
13:2
Item Patrem novimus altissimum dici, sed Filium quoque certum est hoc nomine nuncupari. Nam Patrem invenitur Gabriel angelus ad Mariam loquens, altissimum nun­ cupare, 578 cum dicit: Ecce accipies in utero et paries filium, et vocabis nomen ejus Jesum. Hic erit magnus, et Filius Altissimi vocabitur (Luc. i, 31, 32). De ipso vero Filio beatus David divina repletus inspiratione sic cecinit: Mater Sion dicit: Homo factus est in ea, et ipse fundavit eam Altissimus (Psal. LXXXVI, 5). Quis autem operum unitatem in Patre et Filio dene­ gare audeat, cum ipse Filius eadem opera esse et sua simul et Patris ostendat ? Ait enim : Quæcunque Pater facit, hæc eadem et Filius facit similiter (Joan. v, 19).
照樣,我們知道聖父被稱為至高者,但聖子確實也以此名被稱呼。因為天使加百列對馬利亞說話時,稱聖父為至高者,因他說:「看哪,你要懷孕生子,可以給祂起名叫耶穌。祂要為大,稱為至高者的兒子」(路一31-32)。但論到聖子本身,蒙福的大衛被神聖的感動充滿,如此歌唱:「論到錫安母親必說:這一個那一個都生在其中,至高者自己必堅立這城」(詩八十七5)。當聖子自己顯明同樣的作為既是祂自己的、也是聖父的時候,還有誰敢否認聖父與聖子作為的合一呢?因祂說:「凡父所作的事,子也照樣作」(約五19)。
Likewise we know that the Father is called the Most High, but it is certain that the Son also is called by this name. For the angel Gabriel, speaking to Mary, is found to name the Father as the Most High, when he says: 'Behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb and bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Most High' (Luke 1:31-32). But concerning the Son himself, blessed David, filled with divine inspiration, thus sang: 'Mother Sion shall say: A man is made in her, and the Most High himself hath founded her' (Ps. 86:5). And who would dare to deny the unity of works in the Father and the Son, when the Son himself shows the same works to be at once his own and the Father's? For he says: 'Whatsoever things the Father doeth, these same the Son doeth likewise' (John 5:19).
13:3
Ubi ostendit inter Patrem et Filium divinæ operationis officia, nec dissimilia esse aliquatenus, nec divisa. Qui eniin eadem et similiter facit, sicut non alia, sic non aliter facit; dum vero quæcunque Pater facit, hæc eadem et Filius facit similiter; sicut nihil est in operatione divisum, sic nihil est in virtute diversum. Concordat ergo Patris et Filii una naturam unitate operis, et in operationis similitudine una reful­ get omnipotentia deitatis. Quodsi alter Deus esset Fi­ lius, non eadem quae Pater facit et ipse faceret; si ve­ ro minor esset deitas Filii, quæ facit eadem, similiter non fecisset:
祂在此顯明,聖父與聖子之間神聖運作的職分,既絕不相異,也不分裂。因為那作同樣的事、並以同樣方式行事者,正如祂不作別的事,也不以別的方式行事;而既然凡聖父所作的事,聖子也照樣作,那麼正如運作中毫無分裂,能力中也毫無差異。所以,聖父與聖子的同一本性,藉作為的合一而相合,並在運作的相似中,神性的同一全能就顯耀出來。倘若聖子是另一位神,祂就不會作聖父所作的同樣的事;倘若聖子的神性較小,祂就不會以同樣的方式作那同樣的事:
Where he shows that the offices of divine operation between the Father and the Son are neither in any way dissimilar, nor divided. For he who does the same things and in like manner, as he does not do other things, so he does not do them otherwise; and while whatsoever things the Father does, these same the Son does likewise; as there is nothing divided in the operation, so there is nothing diverse in the power. The one nature of the Father and the Son therefore agrees by the unity of work, and in the likeness of operation the one omnipotence of the Godhead shines forth. But if the Son were another God, he would not himself do the same things that the Father does; but if the Godhead of the Son were less, he would not have done in like manner the same things that the Father does:
13:4
sed dum eadem sunt Patris et Filii opera, a Patre et Filio similiter facta, indubitanter agnoscitur una Patris Filiique natura. Audi adhuc naturalem Patris et Filii, tam in nominibus quam in operibus unitatem. Dicit enim Filius : Sicut habet Pater vitam in semetipso, sic dedit et Filio vitam ha­ bere in semetipso (Ibid., 26). Hoc autem est Patrem Filio vitam dedisse, quod est vitam Filium genuisse. Dedit enim Paler Filio vitam habere in semetipso, sed sicut Pater, jure generationis, non munere lar­ gitatis. Et vide qualitcr dedit Filio vitam habere in semetipso, sicut habet utique Pater vitam in semet­ ipso. Habet autem Pater vitam in semetipso, quia est naturaliter vita :
但既然聖父與聖子的作為是相同的,由聖父與聖子以同樣的方式作成,聖父與聖子的同一本性便無疑地得以被認出。你再聽聖父與聖子的本性合一,無論在名稱上或作為上。因為聖子說:「父怎樣在自己有生命,就賜給祂兒子也照樣在自己有生命」(約五26)。而聖父賜生命給聖子,就是生出聖子成為生命。因為聖父賜給聖子在自己有生命,卻是以聖父的身分、憑生育之權,而非憑慷慨的恩賜。你且看祂怎樣賜給聖子在自己有生命,正如聖父確實在自己有生命一樣。聖父在自己有生命,因為祂本性就是生命:
but since the works of the Father and the Son are the same, done in like manner by the Father and the Son, undoubtedly the one nature of the Father and the Son is recognized. Hear yet further the natural unity of the Father and the Son, as much in names as in works. For the Son says: 'As the Father hath life in himself, so hath he given to the Son also to have life in himself' (John 5:26). But this, that the Father gave life to the Son, is that he begot the Son to be life. For the Father gave the Son to have life in himself, but as the Father, by the right of generation, not by the gift of bounty. And see how he gave the Son to have life in himself, even as the Father surely has life in himself. Now the Father has life in himself, because he is naturally life:
13:5
proinde et Filio habere vitam in semetipso dedil, quia Filium vitam naturaliter ge­ nuit. Ideo beatus Joannes .vitam Filium non desinit praedicare, dicens de illo : Hic est verus Deus, et i ita æterna (I Joan. v, 20). Alio quoque loco sicut vitam dicit Patrem, sic vitam dicit et Filium ; ait enim : Quod erat ab initio, quod audivimus, quod vidimus oculis nostris, quod inspeximus, et manus nostræ con­ trectaverunt de Verbo vitæ (I Joan. I, 1). Scimus au­ tem Verbum Patris esse Filium. Cum ergo Verbum vitæ dicitur Filius, Patrem videmus vitae nomine prædicart. Ipsum vero Verbum vitæ, vitam in subse­ quentibus nominat dicens :
因此祂也賜給聖子在自己有生命,因為祂本性上生出聖子成為生命。所以蒙福的約翰不住地宣告聖子是生命,論到祂說:「這是真神,也是永生」(約壹五20)。在另一處,他既稱聖父為生命,也照樣稱聖子為生命;因他說:「論到從起初原有的生命之道,就是我們所聽見、所看見、親眼看過、親手摸過的」(約壹一1)。我們知道聖父的道就是聖子。所以當聖子被稱為生命之道時,我們看見聖父以生命之名被宣揚。但那生命之道本身,他在下文中稱之為生命,說:
and therefore he gave to the Son also to have life in himself, because he begot the Son naturally as life. Therefore blessed John does not cease to proclaim the Son to be life, saying of him: 'This is the true God, and life eternal' (1 John 5:20). In another place also, as he calls the Father life, so he calls the Son also life; for he says: 'That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life' (1 John 1:1). Now we know that the Word of the Father is the Son. When therefore the Son is called the Word of life, we see the Father proclaimed by the name of life. But the Word of life itself he names, in what follows, as life, saying:
13:6
Et vita palam facta est, et vidimus, et testamur, et annuntiamus vobis vitam æternam quæ erat apud Patrem, et palam facta est nobis (Ibid., 2). Ecce vita Pater, vita Filius dicitur : quia et Verbum vitae, et vita Filius praedicatur : ac per hoc unitas nominis in Patre Filioque naturaliter non discrepat ; unde utique consequenter unitas quoque operum naturali majestate concordat; ipso Filio dicente : Sicut enim Pater suscitat mortuos et vivificat, sic et Filius quos vult vivificat (Joan. v, 21). Hoc autem dicens, et unitatem, et perfectam pote­ statem paternæ ac suae voluntatis ostendit. Non est hic ergo voluntas infirmi, non est opus inviti. Filii enim quos vult vivificat;
「這生命已經顯現出來,我們也看見過,現在又作見證,將原與父同在、且顯現與我們那永遠的生命傳給你們」(約壹一2)。看哪,聖父被稱為生命,聖子也被稱為生命:因為聖子既被宣揚為生命之道,又被宣揚為生命:由此,在聖父與聖子裡名稱的合一本性上並無差異;因而作為的合一也照樣藉本性的威嚴而相合;聖子自己說:「父怎樣叫死人起來,使他們活著,子也照樣隨自己的意思使人活著」(約五21)。祂說這話,就顯明了聖父旨意與自己旨意的合一和完全的權能。所以這裡並非軟弱者的意志,也非不情願者的作為。因為聖子隨自己的意思使人活著;
'And the life was made manifest, and we have seen, and we bear witness, and we declare unto you the life eternal, which was with the Father, and hath appeared to us' (1 John 1:2). Behold, the Father is called life, the Son is called life: because the Son is proclaimed both the Word of life, and life: and by this the unity of the name in the Father and the Son does not naturally differ; whence consequently the unity of works also agrees by natural majesty; the Son himself saying: 'For as the Father raiseth up the dead and quickeneth them, so the Son also quickeneth whom he will' (John 5:21). And in saying this, he shows both the unity and the perfect power of the paternal and of his own will. Here therefore is no will of one that is weak, no work of one that is unwilling. For the Son quickeneth whom he will;
13:7
sed illos procul dubio vivi­ ficat Filius quos vivificat Pater: quaecunque eniM Pater iacit, hæc et Filius facit. Sic etiam quos vult Filius vivificat, 579 sicut Pater quos vult vivificat: quaecunque enim Pater facit, non solum eadem facit Filius, sed et similiter facit. III hac unitate operis, una voluntas est naluralis. Nam si ea quae Pater vo­ lens facit, invitus facere dicitur Filius , eadem qui­ dem facit, sed non similiter facit: sed Veritas dicit quia et eadem et similiter facit. Agnoscatur ergo naturalis unitas, et majestatis æqualitas, ubi nec in opere, nec in voluntate potest esse diversitas.
但子毫無疑問地使那些父所賜生命的人得生命;因為凡父所行的,子也照樣行。因此子也隨自己的意願賜人生命,正如父隨自己的意願賜人生命一樣;因為凡父所行的,子不但行同樣的事,也照同樣的方式行。在這運作的合一中,有一個本性上的意志。因為若說子勉強地行那些父樂意所行的事,他固然行同樣的事,卻不是照同樣的方式行;然而真理宣告他既行同樣的事,也照同樣的方式行。所以應當承認本性的合一與威嚴的同等,因為在此無論在工作或在意志上都不可能有分歧。
But beyond all doubt the Son gives life to those whom the Father gives life; for whatsoever things the Father does, these the Son also does. Thus too the Son gives life to whom he wills, just as the Father gives life to whom he wills; for whatsoever things the Father does, the Son not only does the same, but does them also in like manner. In this unity of operation there is one natural will. For if the Son were said to do unwillingly those things which the Father does willingly, he would indeed do the same things, but not do them in like manner; yet Truth declares that he does both the same things and in like manner. Let there therefore be acknowledged a natural unity and an equality of majesty, where there can be no diversity either in work or in will.
13:8
Cur igilur diversi­ tatem naturae, et nescio quam inaequalitatem Patris ac Filii, ex illis quæ posuisti nominibus atque operi­ bus asseris, et aequalitatem Patris ac Filii ex istis quae commemoravi nominibus atque operibus noa agnoscis FRAGMENTUM II Deus Pater etiam Paracletus. Tu quippe dixisti quia Deus Pater, qui nullo mi­ nor, nullique subjectus est, illa omni humilitate ope­ rum ac nominum caret. Ac primum cognosce quod Deus Pater non careat Paracleti opere, ut ex hoc discas non certare de nomine. Etenim si in Patre opus hujus nominis invenerimus, necesse non erit ut de nomine demonstrando aliquid disputemus. Para.
那麼,你為何要從你所引用的那些名稱和作為中,主張父與子之間有本性上的分歧、以及某種不對等,卻不肯從我所提到的這些名稱和作為中承認父與子的同等呢?第二片段。父神也是保惠師。你確實說過,父神——祂不低於任何一位、不從屬於任何一位——缺乏工作與名稱上一切的卑微。那麼首先要明白,父神並不缺乏保惠師的工作,好叫你從此學會不要為名稱爭辯。因為若我們在父裡面找到這名稱的工作,我們就不必為證明這名稱而辯論什麼了。保惠
Why then do you assert a diversity of nature and some sort of inequality between the Father and the Son from those names and works which you have adduced, yet refuse to acknowledge the equality of the Father and the Son from these names and works which I have recalled? FRAGMENT II. God the Father is also the Paraclete. You indeed said that God the Father, who is less than none and subject to none, lacks all that lowliness of works and names. First, then, learn that God the Father does not lack the work of the Paraclete, so that from this you may learn not to contend about the name. For if we find in the Father the work of this name, there will be no need for us to dispute anything about demonstrating the name. Para-
13:9
cletus in Latina lingua, non solum Advocatus, verum etiam Consolalor dicilur. Audi ergo quid Apostolus de Deo Patre dicat, et ex vero consolationis opere veritatem Dei consolatoris agnosce. Apostolus nem­ pe scribens ad Corinthios ita dicit : Benedictus Deus et Pater Domini nostri Jesu Christi, Pater miaericor­ diarum, et Deus totius consolationis, qui consolatur nos in omni tribulatione nostra (II Cor. i, 3). Quod in Graeco sic habetur : Εὐλογητὸς ὁ Θεὸς ϰαὶ Πατὴρ τοῡ πάσῃ τῇ θλίψει ἡμδν (in Bibl. ὑμῶν ). Ubi consolationi Patris consolationem quoque Filii conjungens, post paululum dicit :
保惠師在拉丁語中不僅被稱為辯護者,也被稱為安慰者。因此請聽使徒論到父神所說的話,並從安慰的真實工作中承認安慰之神的真理。使徒寫信給哥林多人時如此說:「願頌讚歸與我們主耶穌基督的神、就是眾父的父、發慈悲的父、賜各樣安慰的神;我們在一切患難中,他就安慰我們」(林後一3)。這在希臘文中如此記載:「願頌讚歸與那在我們一切患難中安慰我們的神、就是父」(聖經作『你們』)。他在此把子的安慰也連於父的安慰,隨後不久便說:
The Paraclete in the Latin tongue is called not only Advocate but also Comforter. Hear therefore what the Apostle says about God the Father, and from the true work of consolation acknowledge the truth of God the Comforter. For the Apostle, writing to the Corinthians, says thus: «Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies, and the God of all consolation, who comforts us in all our tribulation» (2 Cor. 1:3). Which in the Greek stands thus: «Blessed be the God and Father who comforts us in all our affliction» (in the Bible: 'your'). Where, joining also the consolation of the Son to the consolation of the Father, a little later he says:
13:10
Quoniam sicut abundant passiones Christi in nobis, ita et per Christum abundat consola­ tio nostra (Ibid., 5). Ne vero Patris et Filii consola­ tionem diversam in nobis vel divisam existimes, audi quid ipse beatus Apostolus Thessalonicensibus scribat. Dicit enim : Ipse autem Dominus noster Jesus Chri­ stus, et Deus et Pater noster, qui dilexit nos, et dedit consolationem æternam, et spem bonam in gratia, con­ soletur corda vestra, et confirmet in omni opere et ser­ mone bono (11 Theas. II, i6). Quod autem hic posui, consoletur, nonnulli codices Latini exhortetur habent;
「我們既多受基督的苦楚,就靠基督多得安慰」(同上,5)。但你不要以為父與子的安慰在我們裡面是有分別或分開的,請聽這位有福的使徒寫給帖撒羅尼迦人的話。他說:「但願我們主耶穌基督,和那愛我們、開恩將永遠的安慰並美好的盼望賜給我們的父神,安慰你們的心,並且在一切善行善言上堅固你們」(帖後二16)。我在此雖用了「安慰」一詞,但有些拉丁抄本卻作「勸勉」;
«For as the sufferings of Christ abound in us, so also through Christ does our consolation abound» (ibid., 5). But lest you should think the consolation of the Father and of the Son to be diverse in us or divided, hear what the same blessed Apostle writes to the Thessalonians. For he says: «Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God, even our Father, who has loved us, and has given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace, comfort your hearts, and confirm you in every good work and word» (2 Thess. 2:16). But whereas here I have put «comfort», some Latin manuscripts have «exhort»;
13:11
sed sive hoc sit, sive illud, quia et consolalio et ex­ hortatio apud Græcos παράϰλησις dicitur, ideo nos hoc posuimus ut unam consolationem sive exhorta­ . lionem Patris Filiique monstremus. Nam et apud La­ tinos uterque sermo in sono quidem distat, sed in sensu concordat. Quippe omnis consolator non aliud agit quam ut animam ejus quem consolatur ad spem proventus melioris hortetur. Itaque quamvis 580 sit exhortatio quae non videatur consolationis egere, non tamen est consolatio quæ exbortationis sermone non egeat. llle .igitur locus in Graeco sic continetur eloquio : Αὐτὸς δὲ ὁ Κύριος ὑμῶν ( in Bibl. ἡμῶν ) ἀγαθῷ .
但無論是這個或那個,既然安慰與勸勉在希臘人中都稱為 paraklesis,我們便如此寫,為要顯明父與子的同一安慰或勸勉。因為在拉丁人中,這兩個詞在字音上固然有別,在意義上卻相合。實際上,每一位安慰者所做的無非是勸勉他所安慰之人的心,使其懷抱更美結局的盼望。因此,儘管可能有一種似乎不需安慰的勸勉,卻沒有一種安慰是不需要勸勉之言的。所以那段經文在希臘文中如此表達:「但願我們的主自己……」(聖經作『你們的』;『美善的』)。
but whether it be this or that, since both consolation and exhortation are called paraklesis among the Greeks, we have therefore put it thus in order to show one consolation or exhortation of both the Father and the Son. For among the Latins too both words differ indeed in sound, but agree in sense. Indeed every comforter does nothing else than exhort the soul of the one he comforts toward the hope of a better outcome. And so, although there may be an exhortation which seems not to need consolation, yet there is no consolation which does not need the language of exhortation. That passage, therefore, is contained in Greek in this speech: «But may our Lord himself...» (in the Bible: 'your'; 'good').
13:12
Illum quoque locum diligenter attende, in quo Philippensibus scribens Apostolus, ait: Si qua ergo consolatio in Christo (Philip. II, i); et invenies ita positum : ' Εὶ τις οὒν παράϰλησις ἐν Χριστῷ . Sancti quoque Spiritus consolationem, sanctae collatam Ecclesiæ, divina Scriptura non tacuit. Dictum est enim in libro Actuum apostolorum : Ecclesia quidem per totam Judaam, et Galilæam, et Samariam, habe­ bat pacem ; et ædificabatur ambulans in timore Do­ mini, et consolatione sancti Spiritus replebatur (Act. IX, 31). Quod in Græco sic continetur : At μέν οὒν ματος ἐπληθύνοντο . Quomodo ergo consolator Pater negatur, qui suum populum consolatur?
也請仔細留意那段經文,就是使徒寫信給腓立比人所說的:「所以在基督裡若有什麼安慰」(腓二1);你會發現它如此寫著:「所以在基督裡若有什麼安慰(paraklesis)」。神聖的經文對於賜給聖教會的聖靈的安慰也沒有緘默。因為在使徒行傳一書中說:「那時,猶太、加利利、撒瑪利亞各處的教會都得平安,被建立,凡事敬畏主,蒙聖靈的安慰,人數就增多了」(徒九31)。這在希臘文中如此記載:「……他們的人數就增多了」。那麼,那安慰自己子民的父,怎能被否認為安慰者呢?
Attend diligently also to that passage in which the Apostle, writing to the Philippians, says: «If there be therefore any consolation in Christ» (Phil. 2:1); and you will find it thus placed: «If there be therefore any consolation (paraklesis) in Christ». The divine Scripture also has not been silent about the consolation of the Holy Spirit bestowed upon the holy Church. For it is said in the book of the Acts of the Apostles: «Then indeed the Church throughout all Judea, and Galilee, and Samaria, had peace; and was edified, walking in the fear of the Lord, and was filled with the consolation of the Holy Spirit» (Acts 9:31). Which in Greek is contained thus: «... they were multiplied». How then is the Father denied to be a comforter, who comforts his own people?
13:13
Ipse est enim, sicut supra dictum est, Pater misericordiarum, et Deus totius consolationis, qui consolatur nos in omni tribulatione nostra (II Cor. I, 3). Agnosce ergo Deum Patrem consolatorem nostrum in opere, et disce non inaniter certare de nomine. Quod si perti­ naciter negare non desinis, tibi congolationis ejus beneficium denegabis. Sed cave ne quem consolato­ rem negas, experiaris ultorem. FRAGMENTUM III. Et an i seu nuntii, et doctoris, et judicis officia, Pa­ tri et Spiritui sancto communia sunt. Differt sub­ ministratio a ministerio.
因為祂正如上文所說,是「發慈悲的父、賜各樣安慰的神;我們在一切患難中,他就安慰我們」(林後一3)。所以要承認父神在其工作中是我們的安慰者,並學會不要為名稱徒然爭辯。但你若不肯停止固執地否認,你就是向自己拒絕了祂安慰的益處。然而要當心,免得你所否認為安慰者的那位,你竟嘗到祂作報應者。第三片段。使者、教師和審判者的職分為父與聖靈所共有。「供應」與「服事」有別。
For he it is, as was said above, «the Father of mercies, and the God of all consolation, who comforts us in all our tribulation» (2 Cor. 1:3). Acknowledge therefore God the Father as our comforter in his work, and learn not to contend vainly about the name. But if you do not cease obstinately to deny it, you will deny to yourself the benefit of his consolation. Yet beware lest the one whom you deny to be comforter, you experience as avenger. FRAGMENT III. The offices of messenger, of teacher, and of judge are common to the Father and the Holy Spirit. «Subministration» differs from «ministry».
13:14
Miror autem quomodo Filio et Spiritui sanclo ve­ lis præscribere de nomine nuntii, quasi ex hoc se quisquam ostendat minorem, si suam in quolibet opere nuntiet ignorantibus voluntatem. Quanquam nomen nuntii, qui Græce angelus dicitur, in solo Filio valeat inveniri. Ipse enim dicitur magni consilii Angelus (Isa. ix, 5). Cæterum in Spiritu sancto quamvis opus annuntiationis invenias, angelum ta­ men dici Spiritum sanctum puto te reperire non posse. Filius ergo dictus est magni consilii Angelus: quod tamen consilium non fuit solius Patris, sed erat consilium Trinitatis. Nam ipse Filius, sicut di­ ctus est magni consilii Angelus, ita dicitur admirabilis, consiliarius.
但我很驚奇,你竟想把使者之名限定於子和聖靈,彷彿誰若在任何工作中向不知情的人宣告自己的意願,就藉此顯出自己較小似的。其實使者之名——在希臘文中稱為天使——唯獨在子身上才能找到。因為他被稱為「奇妙策士的使者」(賽九6)。至於聖靈,雖然你可以在他身上找到宣告的工作,但我想你找不到聖靈被稱為天使。所以子被稱為「奇妙策士的使者」;然而這策士並非單屬父,乃是三位一體的策士。因為子自己既被稱為奇妙策士的使者,照樣也被稱為「奇妙的、策士」。
But I marvel how you would wish to restrict to the Son and the Holy Spirit the name of messenger, as though anyone shows himself lesser thereby, if in any work he announces his will to those who are ignorant of it. Although the name of messenger, who in Greek is called angel, can be found in the Son alone. For he is called «the Angel of great counsel» (Isa. 9:6). But as for the Holy Spirit, although you may find in him the work of announcement, yet I think you cannot find the Holy Spirit called an angel. The Son therefore was called the Angel of great counsel: which counsel, nevertheless, was not of the Father alone, but was the counsel of the Trinity. For the Son himself, just as he was called the Angel of great counsel, so also is called «wonderful, counsellor».
13:15
Spiritus quoque sanctus ipse est Spiritus sapientiæ et intellectus, consilii et fortitudinis (Isa. xi, 2). Magni ergo consilii Angelus solus dicitur Filius; sed opus annuntiationis nec a Patre alienum est, necaSpi­ ritn 581 sancto. A Deo namque Patre ca quæ ad Salutem nostram pertinent, annuntiata monstrantur. Quid enim mundo potuit esse salubrius quam Christi Salvatoris adventus? quem tamen se Pater in homi­ nibus annuntiasse testatur : dicit enim per Amos prophetam : Quia ecce ego firmans tonitrum, et creans Spiritum et annuntians in hominibus Christum suum (Amos iv, 13). Utique non nisi persona. Dei Patris accipitur : unde dicit sanctus Lucas evange­ lista quia cum Dei Filius dixisset :
聖靈自己也是「智慧和聰明的靈、謀略和能力的靈」(賽十一2)。所以,奇妙策士的使者唯獨稱為子;但宣告的工作既不與父為外,也不與聖靈為外。因為凡關乎我們救恩的事,都顯明是由父神所宣告的。因為對世界而言,還有什麼比救主基督的降臨更有益處呢?然而父見證說,這是祂親自在人間宣告的:因為祂藉先知阿摩司說:「看哪,那立造山嶽、創造旋風、將他的基督向人宣告的,就是我」(摩四13)。這無非是指父神的位格:因此聖史路加說,當神的子曾說:
The Holy Spirit too is himself «the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, of counsel and might» (Isa. 11:2). The Angel of great counsel, therefore, is called the Son alone; but the work of announcement is alien neither from the Father nor from the Holy Spirit. For by God the Father the things which pertain to our salvation are shown to be announced. For what could be more salutary to the world than the coming of Christ the Saviour? Whom, nevertheless, the Father testifies that he himself announced among men: for he says through the prophet Amos: «For behold, I am he who establishes the thunder, and creates the Spirit, and announces his Christ among men» (Amos 4:13). This is understood of none other than the person of God the Father: whence Saint Luke the evangelist says that, when the Son of God had said:
13:16
Vos autem quem me esse dicitis? respondens Simon Petrus dixit, Chris­ tum Dei (Luc. ix, 20). Ne quis vero audiens Deum di­ centem : Quia ecce ego firmans tonitrum, et creuns spiritum, ex hoc creatum asserere velit Spiritum sanctum, quem constat esse rerum omnium creato­ rem; illud attendat, quia si de sancto Spiritu in hoc loco aliquid esset accipiendum, non utique toni- . trum fuisset primitus nominatum. Dicitur autem : Ecce ego firmans tonitrum et creans spiritum: quod si secundum litteram voluerit quisquam percipere, non est aliud quod hic nomine spiritus accipiat posi­ tum esse, quam ventum, qui etiam in psalmo dic­ tur spiritus tempestatis (Psal. X, 7):
「你們說我是誰?西門彼得回答說,是神所立的基督」(路九20)。但有人聽見神說:「看哪,那立造山嶽、創造旋風的就是我」,恐怕有人因此想主張聖靈是被造的——那位公認為萬物創造者的靈——就當留意這點:若在此處要就聖靈領會什麼,山嶽(雷聲)就斷不會首先被提及。但經上說:「看哪,我立造雷聲,創造風」:若有人願按字面領會,他在此該以「風(靈)」之名所領會的,無非就是風,這風在詩篇中也稱為「暴風之靈」(詩十7〔十一6〕):
«But whom do you say that I am? Simon Peter answering said, The Christ of God» (Luke 9:20). But lest anyone, hearing God saying: «For behold, I am he who establishes the thunder, and creates the Spirit», should on this account wish to assert that the Holy Spirit was created — the Spirit who is agreed to be the Creator of all things — let him attend to this, that if in this place anything were to be understood of the Holy Spirit, the thunder would surely not have been named first. But it is said: «Behold, I establish the thunder and create the Spirit»: but if anyone wished to take it according to the letter, there is nothing else that he should here understand to be placed under the name of «spirit» than the wind, which in the psalm too is called «the spirit of tempest» (Ps. 10:7 [11:6]):
13:17
presertim quia præmisit tonitrum, quod utique tunc assolet fieri, quando nubes ventis flantibus congregantur. Verum­ tamen quia haic prophetico loco magis intellectus convenit spiritalis (maxime quia cum dixisset : Ecce ego firmans tonitrum, et creans spiritum ; continuo addidit, et annuntians in hominibus Christum suum), digne hic accipiamus prophetatum apostolicæ præ­ dicationis officium. Ipsam quippe prædicationem to- kitrum nominavit, de qua et beatus David dicit: Vox tonitrui tui in rota (Psal. LXXVI, 19) : id est, Vox prædicationis tuæ in orbem terrarum. Rotæ quippe nomine orbem significavit : nam et rota or. bis est, unde rotæ parvulæ orbiculi appellantur;
尤其因為他先提到雷聲,而雷聲通常正是在雲被吹動的風聚集時才發生。然而,因為屬靈的領會更適合這段預言性的經文(特別是因為,當他說了「看哪,我立造雷聲,創造風」之後,隨即加上「並在人間宣告他的基督」),我們在此就當恰當地領會使徒傳道之職是被預言了。因為他把那傳道正稱為「雷聲」,論到這雷聲,有福的大衛也說:「你的雷聲在旋風中(輪中)」(詩七十六19〔七十七18〕):就是說,你的傳道之聲遍及全地。因為他以「輪」之名表明地球(圓周):因為輪也是一個圓,因此小輪被稱為「小圓」;
especially because he set thunder first, which is wont to happen precisely when clouds are gathered by the blowing winds. Nevertheless, because a spiritual understanding is more fitting to this prophetic passage (chiefly because, when he had said: «Behold, I establish the thunder, and create the spirit», he immediately added, «and announcing his Christ among men»), let us here worthily understand the office of apostolic preaching to be prophesied. For he named that very preaching «thunder», concerning which blessed David too says: «The voice of your thunder in the wheel» (Ps. 76:19 [77:18]): that is, the voice of your preaching throughout the globe of the earth. For by the name of «wheel» he signified the globe: for a wheel too is a circle, whence little wheels are called «orbicles»;
13:18
et via rotae dicitur orbita, id est orbis semita. Firmavit ergo Deus tonitrum, firmans evangelicam praedicatio­ nem : creavit spiritum, faciens spiritales Evangelii prædicatores ; et annuntiavit in hominibus Christum suum, per dispensationem scilicet Testamenti Novi. Cum ergo et Patri et Filio et Spiritui sancto opus, annuntiationis videas convenire, quid est quod voca­ bulis quæris differentiam demonstrare, cum tamen solum Filium iuvenias angelum dici ? Caeterum in persona Spiritus sancti non facile quisquam hoc possit invenire vocabulum.
輪子行過的軌跡稱為「軌道」,就是圓周的路徑。所以神立造雷聲,即立定了福音的傳道;他創造風(靈),即造就了福音屬靈的傳道者;他在人間宣告他的基督,就是藉新約的安排。因此,既然你看見宣告的工作合乎父、子和聖靈,那你為何要藉名稱來證明差別呢?何況你發現唯獨子被稱為天使。此外,在聖靈的位格中,沒有人能輕易找到這名稱。
and the track of a wheel is called an «orbit», that is, the path of the circle. God therefore established the thunder, in that he established the evangelical preaching; he created the spirit, in that he made spiritual preachers of the Gospel; and he announced his Christ among men, namely through the dispensation of the New Testament. Since, therefore, you see that the work of announcement befits the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, why is it that you seek to demonstrate a difference by names, when yet you find that the Son alone is called an angel? Moreover, in the person of the Holy Spirit no one can easily find this name.
13:19
Si ergo de nomine quæ­ stionem moves, non habes quod objicias Spiritui sancto, ut eum minorem asseras Filio, cum angeli nomine magis inveniatur Scriptura sancta Filium, nuncupare. Sed si angeli vocabulum, non secundum. divinitatem, sed secundum carnem Filio asseris assi­ gnandum, noli ergo a divinitate Patris diversam dicere divinitatem Filii, cum angeli vocabulum non. dicis divinitati ejus convenire, sed carni. Si vero,. quod congruum magis est, non nomen operis,. sed­ ipsum opus attendis, communis invenitur annuntia­ tio Trinitatis. Attende igitur illum sermonem Domini Salvatoris, quem ad discipulos habuit, quando eis Paracleti promisit adventum ;
所以你若對名稱提出質疑,你就沒有什麼可用來反對聖靈,好把他斷為比子小的,因為聖經反而發現以天使之名稱呼子。但你若主張「天使」一詞當歸於子,不是按其神性,而是按其肉身,那你就不要說子的神性與父的神性有分歧,因為你既說「天使」一詞不合乎他的神性,只合乎他的肉身。但你若——這更為恰當——不留意工作的名稱,而留意工作本身,就會發現宣告是三位一體所共有的。因此請留意主救主向門徒所講的那段話,就是他應許他們保惠師要來的時候;
If therefore you raise a question about the name, you have nothing to object against the Holy Spirit, so as to assert him lesser than the Son, since Holy Scripture is found rather to call the Son by the name of angel. But if you assert that the term «angel» is to be assigned to the Son not according to his divinity, but according to his flesh, then do not call the divinity of the Son diverse from the divinity of the Father, since you do not say that the term «angel» befits his divinity, but his flesh. But if — which is more fitting — you attend not to the name of the work, but to the work itself, the announcement is found common to the Trinity. Attend therefore to that discourse of the Lord and Saviour which he held to his disciples, when he promised them the coming of the Paraclete;
13:20
et hoc in eo accipe, ad quod eum cognoveris advenisse. Ante suam quippe Dominus passionem, ad docendum venturum disci­ pulis Paracletum Spiritum eo loco prædixit, ubi a Patre 582 simul et a Filio ipsum Paracletum mit­ tendum esse promisit. Ait enim : Paracletus enim Spiritus sanctus, quem mittet Pater in nomine meo, tile vos docebit omnia quæcunque dixero vobis (loan. XIV, 26.) Docebit vos utique, ait, non postulabit pro vobis. Item in codem sermone : Cum autem venerit Paracletus quem ego mittam in vos a Patre, Spiritum veritatis qui a Patre procedit, ille testimonium perhibe­ bit de me (Joan. xv, 26); et iterum : Adhuc multa ha­ beo vobis dicere, sed non potestis portare modo.
並要就他領會這點,即你所知道他為之而來的目的。因為在自己受難之前,主向門徒預言那保惠師聖靈要來施教,就在他應許這同一位保惠師要由父並由子差來的那處。因為他說:「但保惠師,就是父因我的名所要差來的聖靈,他要將一切的事教導你們,並且要叫你們想起我對你們所說的一切話」(約十四26)。他說「他要教導你們」,不是說「他要為你們祈求」。同樣在同一段話中:「但我要從父那裡差保惠師來,就是從父出來真理的聖靈,我差他來的時候,他要為我作見證」(約十五26);又說:「我還有好些事要告訴你們,但你們現在擔當不了」。
and understand this concerning him, for the purpose for which you know him to have come. For before his passion the Lord foretold to the disciples that the Paraclete Spirit would come to teach, in that place where he promised that this same Paraclete would be sent both by the Father and by the Son. For he says: «For the Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things whatsoever I have said to you» (John 14:26). «He will teach you», he says, not «he will petition for you». Likewise in the same discourse: «But when the Paraclete has come, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness of me» (John 15:26); and again: «I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now».
13:21
Cum autem venerit ille Spiritus veritatis, docebit vo: omnem veritatem (Joan. xvi, 12). Ubi ex ipsa similitudine operis ostensa est communio deitatis. Docet enim nos Pater, Domino dicente : Est scriptum in prophe­ tis : Et erunt omnes docibiles Dei. Omnis qui audivit a Patre et didicit, velli, ad me (Isa. niv, 13). Docet et Filius de quo scriptum est, quia accesserunt ad eum discipuli ejus, et aperiens os suum docebat eos (Matth. V, i, 2). Docet nos etiam SpiriLus sanctus, sicut superius ex verbis ipsius Filii Dei docuimus. Inde est quod etiam beatus Paulus doctrinæ sancti Spiritus omne opus suæ prædicationis assignat, di­ cens :
「但那真理的聖靈來了,他要引導你們進入一切真理」(約十六12-13)。在此,正是從工作的相似,顯明了神性的相通。因為父教導我們,主說:「先知書上寫著說:他們都要蒙神的教訓。凡聽見父之教訓又學習的,就到我這裡來」(賽五十四13;約六45)。子也施教,論到他有記載說:「他的門徒到他跟前來,他就開口教訓他們」(太五1-2)。聖靈也教導我們,正如我們上文從神子自己的話所顯明的。因此有福的保羅也把他傳道的全部工作歸於聖靈的教導,說:
«But when that Spirit of truth has come, he will teach you all truth» (John 16:12-13). Where, from the very likeness of the work, the communion of the deity has been shown. For the Father teaches us, the Lord saying: «It is written in the prophets: And they shall all be taught of God. Everyone who has heard of the Father and has learned, comes to me» (Isa. 54:13; John 6:45). The Son also teaches, of whom it is written that «his disciples came to him, and opening his mouth he taught them» (Matt. 5:1-2). The Holy Spirit also teaches us, as we have shown above from the very words of the Son of God. Hence it is that blessed Paul too assigns the whole work of his preaching to the teaching of the Holy Spirit, saying:
13:22
Quia enim scit hominum quæ sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis qui in ipso est? Ita et quæ Dei sunt nemo cognovit, nisi Spiritus Dei. Nos autem non spiritum mundi accepimus, sed Spiritum qui ex Deo eat, ut sciamus quæ a Deo donata sunt nobis. Quæ et loquimur, non in doctis humanæ sapientiæ verbis, sed in doctrina Spiritus (I Cor. II, ii, 12, 13). Hanc Spiritus sancli doctrinam beatus quoque nobis Joan­ nes insinuat, ipsum Spiritum sanctum nomine signi­ ficans uncLionis. Sic enim ait: Hæc scribo vobis de his qui seducunt vos. Et vos unctionem quam accepistis ab eo, maneat in vobis. Et non necesse habetis ut ali­ quis doceat vos;
「除了在人裡頭的靈,誰知道人的事呢?照樣,除了神的靈,也沒有人知道神的事。我們所領受的,並不是世上的靈,乃是從神來的靈,叫我們能知道神開恩賜給我們的事。我們所講的,也不是用人智慧所教導的言語,乃是用聖靈所教導的言語」(林前二11-13)。有福的約翰也把聖靈的這教導灌輸給我們,以「膏抹」之名指示聖靈自己。因為他如此說:「我將這些話寫給你們,是指著那引誘你們的人說的。你們從主所受的恩膏常存在你們心裡,並不用人教訓你們;
«For who among men knows the things of a man, save the spirit of a man which is in him? So too the things of God no one has known, save the Spirit of God. Now we have not received the spirit of this world, but the Spirit which is of God, that we may know the things that are given us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the learned words of human wisdom, but in the teaching of the Spirit» (1 Cor. 2:11-13). This teaching of the Holy Spirit blessed John too instils in us, signifying the Holy Spirit himself by the name of «anointing». For he says thus: «These things I write to you concerning those who seduce you. And let the anointing which you have received from him abide in you. And you have no need that anyone teach you;
13:23
sed sicut unctio ejus docet vos de om­ nibus, et verum eat, et non est mendacium (J oan. II, 26). Haec dicta sint a nobis, quia voluisti Spiritui sancto Advocati nomen objicere, pro eo quod eum Dominus Jesus Paracletum nominavit; ut ostendere­ mus cujus operis gratia dixerit Dominus Paracletum fuisse venturum. Nam quoniam doctor ipse a discipu­ lis corporaliter discedebat, doctorem illis utique pro­ mittebat : et vide qualem doctorem, qui eis et scien- tiam tribueret, et virtutem. De ipso quippe ait dis­ cipulis : Vos autem sedete in civitate, donec indua­ mini virtute ex alto (Luc. XXIV, 49); et iterum dicit: Accipietis virtutem supervenientis Spiritus sancti in vos (Act. i, 8).
自有主的恩膏在凡事上教訓你們,這恩膏是真的,不是假的」(約壹二26-27)。我們說這些話,是因為你想把辯護者之名歸咎於聖靈,理由是主耶穌稱他為保惠師;好叫我們顯明主說保惠師要來,是為著什麼工作的緣故。因為那位教師自己既要在肉身上離開門徒,他必是應許他們一位教師:且看是何等的教師,就是要賜他們知識並能力的那一位。因為論到他,主對門徒說:「你們要在城裡等候,直到你們領受從上頭來的能力」(路二十四49);又說:「但聖靈降臨在你們身上,你們就必得著能力」(徒一8)。
but as his anointing teaches you concerning all things, and is true, and is no lie» (1 John 2:26-27). Let these things be said by us, because you wished to object the name of Advocate to the Holy Spirit, on the ground that the Lord Jesus named him Paraclete; so that we might show for the sake of what work the Lord said the Paraclete would come. For since the teacher himself was departing bodily from the disciples, he was surely promising them a teacher: and see what kind of teacher, one who would bestow on them both knowledge and power. For concerning him he says to the disciples: «But sit in the city, until you be endued with power from on high» (Luke 24:49); and again he says: «You shall receive power when the Holy Spirit comes upon you» (Acts 1:8).
13:24
Ipse itaque Spiritus veniens, sicut tri­ buit cognitionem, ita contulit firmitatem. Propterea scriptum est de discipulis : Et repleti sunt omnes Spiritu sancto, et loquebantur verbum Dei cum fiducia (Act. IV, 31). Die minorem doctorem, si doctrinam ejus quaelibet philosophia vicit: die minorem docto­ rem, si ab illo firmatos regum saevitia superavit. Mi­ nistrum vero nescio utrum alicubi dictum invenire poteris Spiritum sanctum. Et ne tuæ assertioni de illo Apastoli loco aliquid juvaminis repromittas, in quo Philippensibus scribens ait : Scio enim quoniam hoc mihi proveniet in salutem, per vestram orationem et subministrationem SpiritUs Jesu Christi (Phitip. i, 19).
因此聖靈自己降臨,既賜下知識,也照樣賜下堅固。為此緣故,論到門徒有記載說:「他們就都被聖靈充滿,放膽講論神的道」(徒四31)。你若能舉出哪種哲學勝過了他的教導,就說這教師較小:你若能舉出君王的殘暴勝過了那些被他堅固的人,就說這教師較小。至於聖靈是否在任何地方被稱為僕役(服事者),我卻不知道。你也不要以為那段使徒的經文能為你的主張提供什麼支持,就是他寫信給腓立比人所說的:「因為我知道,這事藉著你們的祈禱和耶穌基督之靈的供應,終必叫我得救」(腓一19)——
Therefore the Spirit himself, coming, just as he bestowed knowledge, so also conferred firmness. For this reason it is written of the disciples: «And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and spoke the word of God with boldness» (Acts 4:31). Call the teacher lesser, if any philosophy has conquered his teaching: call the teacher lesser, if the savagery of kings has overcome those made firm by him. But whether you can anywhere find the Holy Spirit called a minister (servant), I do not know. And lest you promise yourself any support for your assertion from that passage of the Apostle in which, writing to the Philippians, he says: «For I know that this shall turn to my salvation, through your prayer and the subministration of the Spirit of Jesus Christ» (Phil. 1:19)—
13:25
Puto quod homo, qui te Latinitatis peritum esse commemoras, prorsus noveris non hoc esse submini­ strare, quod est ministrare. Quia in uno horum obse­ quium humilitatis, in altero autem iudiciumabundan­ tiæ 583ac potestatisostenditur. A ministrantequippe obsequium redditur, a subministrante vero subsidium praerogatur. Nam 'dic mihi, quaeso, cum Apostolus dixisset hominibus : Scio quia hoc mihi proveniet in salutem, per vestram orationem; in qua oratione uti­ que non illorum ministerium, sed adjutorium exspe - ctabat, sicut alibi ostendit, dicens : Obsecro igitur vos, fratres, per caritatem Spiritus, ut adjuvetis me in orationibus pro me ad Deum (Rom. xv, 30);
我想,你既自稱是精通拉丁文的人,必定知道「供應(subministrare)」與「服事(ministrare)」並不相同。因為前者顯出謙卑的順從,後者卻顯出豐盛與能力的標記。因為服事者所獻的是順從的服侍,而供應者所賜的是幫助。因為請告訴我,當使徒對眾人說:「我知道,這事藉著你們的祈禱,終必叫我得救」——他在這祈禱中所等候的,肯定不是他們的服事,而是他們的幫助,正如他在別處所顯明的,說:「弟兄們,我藉著聖靈的愛勸你們,與我一同竭力,為我祈求神」(羅十五30);
I think that you, a man who profess yourself skilled in Latinity, surely know that «to subminister» is not the same as «to minister». For in the one is shown the obedience of humility, but in the other the mark of abundance and of power. For by the one who ministers, obedient service is rendered; but by the one who subministers, aid is bestowed. For tell me, I pray, when the Apostle had said to men: «I know that this shall turn to my salvation, through your prayer» — in which prayer he was surely awaiting not their ministry, but their help, as he shows elsewhere, saying: «I beseech you therefore, brethren, through the love of the Spirit, that you help me in your prayers for me to God» (Rom. 15:30);
13:26
cum ergo, sicut dixi, orationem fidelium beatus Paulus in adjutorium exspectaret, quid opus fuit ut adjungeret, Et subministrationem Spiritus Jesu Christi ? nisi quia voluit ostendere quod orationi fidelium Spiritus san­ ctus largiatur effectum, dum his a quibus vel pro qui­ bus oratur subministrat auxilium : non hoc faciens servilis conditionis obsequio, sed divinæ, quam cum Patre et Filio unam naturaliter habet, imperio pote­ statis. Quod ut manifestius noveris, veritatem tibi etiam in hoc loco Græcæ ingeram lectionis. Scribens enim beatus Paulus ad Timotheum, inter alia dicit : Marcum assume, et adduc tecum : est enim mihi utilis in ministerium : quod in Græco sic habetur :
因此,正如我所說,有福的保羅既等候信徒的祈禱作為幫助,那他為何還要加上「並耶穌基督之靈的供應」呢?無非是因為他想顯明:聖靈把功效賜給信徒的祈禱,同時把幫助供應給那些被人祈求、或人為之祈求的人——他這樣做,不是憑僕役身分的順從服侍,而是憑神性能力的命令,這能力是他按本性與父和子同有為一的。為叫你更明白地知道這點,我也要在此為你引出希臘文讀法的真義。因為有福的保羅寫信給提摩太,在其他事中說:「你來的時候要把馬可帶來,因為他在服事的事上與我有益」:這在希臘文中如此記載:
since therefore, as I said, blessed Paul was awaiting the prayer of the faithful as a help, what need was there for him to add, «and the subministration of the Spirit of Jesus Christ»? unless because he wished to show that the Holy Spirit bestows effect upon the prayer of the faithful, while he subministers aid to those for whom or on whose behalf prayer is made — doing this not by the obedient service of a servile condition, but by the command of divine power, which he has by nature one with the Father and the Son. That you may know this more manifestly, I will also bring forward for you in this place the truth of the Greek reading. For blessed Paul, writing to Timothy, among other things says: «Take Mark, and bring him with you: for he is useful to me for the ministry»: which in Greek stands thus:
13:27
Μάρϰον ἀναλαὼν ἂγαγε (in Bibl. ἂγε ) μετὰ σεαυτοῡ ἒστι γάρ μοι ε χρηστος Ii, διαϰονίαν (II Tim. IV, 11). Vides nempe hic ab Apostolo ministerium διαϰονίαν dici. In illo autem loco ait : Per vestram orationem et submi­ nistrationem Spiritus Jesu Christi, in Graeco positum est, διὰ τῆς ύμῶν δεήσεως , xai ἐπιχορηγίας τοῦ πνεύ­ ματος 'Ιησοῦ Χριστοῦ (Philip. i, 19). Nonne manife­ stum est, non hoc esse διαϰονίαν , quod est χορηγίαν ? Audi et aliud de beati Petri Epistola manifestius do­ cumentum, quo et administrationem, id est χορηγίαν , non esse creature, sed Creatoris agnoscas;
「你來的時候要把馬可帶來(聖經作『領來』),因為他在服事(diakonian)的事上與我有益」(提後四11)。你確實看見,使徒在此把服事稱為 diakonia。但在那另一段中他說:「藉著你們的祈禱和耶穌基督之靈的供應」;希臘文所寫的是「藉著你們的祈求和耶穌基督之靈的供給(epichoregias)」(腓一19)。難道不明顯嗎——diakonia 與 choregia 並不相同?也請聽另一個更清楚的憑據,出自有福的彼得的書信,藉此你可以認識到:「供給」,即 choregia,不屬於受造之物,乃屬於創造者;
«Take Mark and bring (in the Bible: 'lead') him with you, for he is useful to me for the ministry (diakonian)» (2 Tim. 4:11). You see indeed that here the ministry is called by the Apostle diakonia. But in that other passage he says: «Through your prayer and the subministration of the Spirit of Jesus Christ»; in Greek it is placed, «through your supplication and the supply (epichoregias) of the Spirit of Jesus Christ» (Phil. 1:19). Is it not manifest that diakonia is not the same as choregia? Hear also another, clearer proof from the Epistle of blessed Peter, whereby you may recognize that «administration», that is choregia, belongs not to the creature, but to the Creator;
13:28
et ex administrationis nomine, Spiritum sanctum non aliud esse quam Deum, sine aliqua caligine dubitationis in­ telligas. Dicit enim beatus Petrus : Hospitales inter vos sine murmuratione : unusquisque qualem accepit gratiam, inter vos illam ministrantes, ut boni dispen­ satores multiformis gratiæ Dei. Si quis loquitur, tan- quam sermones Dei : si quis ministrat, tanquam ex virtute, quam administrat Deus. Quod in Graeco sic χορηγεῖ ὁ Θεὸς (I Petre IV, 9). Ex his locis, quae magis Græco quam Latino discernuntur eloquio, ministe­ rium ad operationem humanam, administratio vero sive subministratio ad divinam cognoscitur gratiam pertinere.
又叫你從「供給(administration)」之名,毫無疑雲地明白:聖靈無非就是神。因為有福的彼得說:「你們要互相款待,不發怨言;各人要照所得的恩賜彼此服事,作神百般恩賜的好管家。若有講道的,要按著神的聖言講;若有服事人的,要按著神所供給(賜)的力量服事」。這在希臘文中如此:「……就是神所供給(choregei)的」(彼前四9-11)。從這些藉希臘文而非拉丁文才得以分辨的經文中,可知「服事」是關乎人的作為,而「供給」或「供應」則關乎神的恩典。
and that from the name of «administration» you may understand, without any mist of doubt, that the Holy Spirit is nothing other than God. For blessed Peter says: «Be hospitable one to another without murmuring: as every man has received grace, ministering it among yourselves, as good stewards of the manifold grace of God. If any man speak, let it be as the words of God; if any man minister, let it be as of the power which God administers (supplies)». Which in Greek is thus: «... which God supplies (choregei)» (1 Pet. 4:9-11). From these passages, which are distinguished by Greek rather than by Latin speech, «ministry» is known to pertain to human operation, but «administration» or «subministration» to divine grace.
13:29
Hoc est itaque Spirilui sancto submini­ strare, quod est sufficientiam dare. Cum enim Deus virtutem administrat, sufficientiam donat. Quam suf­ ficientiam non ex nobis, sed ex Deo esse bcatus Apo­ stolus docens : Sufficientia, inquit, nostra ex Deo est. qui et ideneos nos fecit ministros Novi Testamenti, non littera, sed spiritu (II Cor. III, 5, 6). Ostendens autem ministerium suum, curavit etiam subministra­ tionem sancti Spiritus demonstrare, dicens : Littera enim occidit, Spiritus autem vivificat (Ibidem). Visum vero tibi est, Deum Patrem judicem dicere, quasi non hoc sit et Filius et Spiritus sanctus. An nescis ab Apostolo dictum :
那麼,供應於聖靈,就是賜下充足。因為當神施予能力時,他就賜下充足。這充足不是出於我們自己,而是出於神,有福的使徒如此教導說:「我們所能承擔的乃是出於神;他叫我們能承當這新約的執事,不是憑著字句,乃是憑著精意(聖靈)」(林後三5-6)。他在顯明自己的服事時,也留心顯明聖靈的供應,說:「因為那字句是叫人死,精意(聖靈)是叫人活」(同上)。但你竟以稱父神為審判者為理由,彷彿子和聖靈並非如此。難道你不知道使徒曾說:
This, then, is to subminister to the Holy Spirit: it is to give sufficiency. For when God administers power, he gives sufficiency. That this sufficiency is not from ourselves but from God, the blessed Apostle teaches, saying: «Our sufficiency is from God, who has also made us fit ministers of the New Testament, not of the letter, but of the spirit» (2 Cor. 3:5-6). And showing his own ministry, he took care also to demonstrate the subministration of the Holy Spirit, saying: «For the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life» (ibid.). But it has seemed to you a matter for calling God the Father a judge, as though this were not also the case with the Son and the Holy Spirit. Or do you not know that it was said by the Apostle:
13:30
Testificor coram Deo, et Christo Jesu, qui judicaturus est vit'os ac mortuos, et per ad­ ventum ipsius f et regnum ipsius (11 Tim. iv , 1). De Spiritu autem 584 sancto ipse Filius dicit, quia arguet mundum de peccato, et de justitia et de judicio (loan. XVI, 8). EX LIBRO II, DE OFFICIIS POSTULANDI, GEMENDI ET ORANDI IN CHRISTO ET SPIRITU SANCTO. FRAGMENTUM IV. In Christo duce naturae, persona unica. Nos confitentes Christum Filium Dei vivi (quod eum confessus est apostolus Petrus, et ab ipso Salvatore (Matth. xvi, 16, 17), confessionis hujus gratia meruit vocari beatus), unum eumdemque Filium Dei atque hominis credimus ;
「我在神面前,並在將來審判活人死人的基督耶穌面前,憑著他的顯現和他的國度囑咐你」(提後四1)。但論到聖靈,子自己說,「他要叫世人為罪、為義、為審判,自己責備自己」(約十六8)。摘自第二卷《論在基督與聖靈裡祈求、歎息、禱告之職》。第四片段。在基督——眾性之首——裡,只有一個位格。我們承認基督是永生神的兒子(這是使徒彼得對他所承認的,並因這承認的恩典,蒙救主自己稱他為有福的(太十六16-17)),我們相信他是同一位、既是神的兒子又是人的兒子;
«I charge you before God, and Christ Jesus, who shall judge the living and the dead, and by his coming and his kingdom» (2 Tim. 4:1). But concerning the Holy Spirit, the Son himself says, that «he will convict the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment» (John 16:8). FROM BOOK II, ON THE OFFICES OF PETITIONING, GROANING, AND PRAYING IN CHRIST AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. FRAGMENT IV. In Christ, the leader of natures, there is a single person. We, confessing Christ to be the Son of the living God (which the apostle Peter confessed of him, and by the grace of this confession deserved to be called blessed by the Saviour himself (Matt. 16:16-17)), believe him to be one and the same Son of God and of man;
13:31
et in eo paternae maternæque substantiae naturalem cognoscentes certissime veri­ tatem : sicut utramque naturam in eo non findimus, sic etiam nullatenus separamus. Hoc quippe in Nesto­ rianis catbolica culpat et condemnat Ecclesia ; qui maxime in hoc errant, in quo propter geminam Chritti substantiam volunt in eo geminare personam; ut aliam dicant ad Filium Dei, aliam vero ad Filium hominis pertinere : cum unus idemque sit Dei et ho­ minis Filius, de Deo Patre Verbum Deus, et de Vir­ gine matre Verbum caro factum, id est Deus homo veraciter natus : qui formam servi accipiens, in qua de matre fieret homo verus, nihil amisit in illa forma Dei, in qua cum Patre unus est naturaliter Deus;
並且極確定地承認在他裡面有父方與母方本質的本性真理:正如我們不把他裡面的兩性割裂,我們也絕不將它們分開。這正是大公教會在涅斯多留派中所責備並定罪的;他們最大的錯誤就在於:因基督有雙重本質,便想把他裡面的位格加倍,以致說一位屬神的兒子,另一位屬人的兒子:其實那位神的兒子與人的兒子乃是同一位,從父神而言是那作神的道,從童貞女母親而言是道成了肉身,就是真實地生為人的神:他取了奴僕的形像,好在其中由母親成為真人,卻在那與父按本性同為一神的神的形像上毫無虧損;
and, most certainly acknowledging in him the natural truth of the paternal and maternal substance: as we do not divide in him either nature, so also we in no way separate them. This indeed is what the Catholic Church blames and condemns in the Nestorians; who err most of all in this, that on account of the twin substance of Christ they wish to double the person in him, so as to say that one belongs to the Son of God, but another to the Son of man: whereas one and the same is the Son of God and of man, from God the Father the Word who is God, and from the Virgin mother the Word made flesh, that is, God truly born a man: who, taking the form of a servant, in which he might become from his mother a true man, lost nothing in that form of God, in which with the Father he is by nature one God;
13:32
et cum semetipsum exinanivit, suis permansit divitiis plenus; et cum se humiliavit, non destitit esse quod erat, semper Altissimus. Unde sic etiam! factus est obediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis (Philip. II, 8), ut in opere obeditionis jura non amit­ teret propriae potestatis. Proinde, et cum mortuus est, nihilominus Deus verus et vita æterna esse non destitit; et cum ignominiam crucis humili corde por­ tavit, Dominus gloriæ majestatisque permansit. FRAGMENTUM V. Quomodo gemat aut postulet Spiritus sanctus. Secundum rectam itaque catholicae fidei regulam, non ita debet accipi quod Spiritus sanctus gemat :
當他倒空自己時,仍充滿自己的豐富;當他自己謙卑時,並未止息其本然所是,始終是至高者。因此他也如此「順服以至於死,且死在十字架上」(腓二8),以致在順服的工作中並未喪失自己權能的權利。所以,即使他死了,他仍不止息是真神和永遠的生命;當他以謙卑的心承受十字架的恥辱時,他仍是榮耀與威嚴的主。第五片段。聖靈如何歎息或祈求。因此,按著大公信仰的正確準則,「聖靈歎息」一語不可如此領會:
and when he emptied himself, he remained full of his own riches; and when he humbled himself, he did not cease to be what he was, always the Most High. Whence thus too he «became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross» (Phil. 2:8), in such a way that in the work of obedience he did not lose the rights of his own power. Accordingly, even when he died, he nonetheless did not cease to be true God and life eternal; and when with a humble heart he bore the ignominy of the cross, he remained the Lord of glory and of majesty. FRAGMENT V. How the Holy Spirit may groan or petition. According to the right rule, therefore, of the Catholic faith, that the Holy Spirit groans must not be understood in such a way:
13:33
cum utique gemitus, non solum naturae divinæ, quam Spiritus sanctus habet, sed nec angelicæ beatitudini, 'quam ex dono Trinitatis sancli angeli cognoscuntur habere , conveniat. Unde illo modo recte accipitur, quo solet signilicari 585 per efficientem id quod efficitur, id est, gemere, desiderare,. et postulare nos faciat, dum scilicet gemendi atque postulandi cordi­ bus nostris inspirat affectum. Sic autem Spiritus san­ ctus gemere, desiderare ac postulare dicitur, sicut et Deus dicitur cognoscere, pro eo quod cognoscentem faciat. Dictum namque est ad Abraham : Nunc co­ gnovi quoniam times Deum, et non pepercisti filio tuo dilecto propter me (Genes. XXII, 12).
因為歎息既不合乎聖靈所具有的神性本性,也不合乎眾聖天使藉三位一體的恩賜而被認為擁有的天使之福。因此,這話應當按那種方式恰當地領會,就是慣以致成者(效力因)來表明被致成之事——也就是說,他使我們歎息、渴慕、祈求,即當他把歎息與祈求的情感吹入我們心中的時候。所以,聖靈被說成歎息、渴慕、祈求,正如神也被說成「知道」,是因為他使人知道。因為神對亞伯拉罕說:「現在我知道你是敬畏神的了,因為你沒有將你的兒子,就是你所愛的,留下不給我」(創二十二12)。
since indeed groaning befits neither the divine nature, which the Holy Spirit possesses, nor even the angelic beatitude, which the holy angels are known to have by the gift of the Trinity. Whence it is rightly understood in that manner in which it is wont to be signified by way of the efficient cause producing what is effected — that is, he makes us groan, desire, and petition, namely while he inspires into our hearts the affection of groaning and petitioning. So then the Holy Spirit is said to groan, desire, and petition, just as God too is said to «know», by reason of his making one who knows. For it was said to Abraham: «Now I know that you fear God, and have not spared your beloved son for my sake» (Gen. 22:12).
13:34
Unde quia in Deo naturaliter omnium reruin manet incommutabilis et æterna cognitio, et nefas est credere sempiternam divinitatem temporaliter aliquid agnovisse; hoc utique regula veritatis exposcit, ut dum divinitas se cogno­ visse dicit, agnoscatur quia cognoscentem facit. Eum­ dem locutionis modum beatus Apostolus tenuit scri- bens ad Galatas, dicens : Sed tunc quidem ignorantes Deum, his qui natura non sunt dii serviebatis. Nunc autem cum cognoveritis Deum, imo cogniti sitis a Deo (Gal. IV, 8, 9). Ubi utique non falsum fuit quod dixit Apostolus, quia cognoverunt Deum, et hoc quasi vo­ luit sequenti removere sententia :
因此,既然在神裡面按本性存留著對萬物不變而永恆的認識,而相信永恆的神性曾在時間中才認識什麼乃是不虔的;真理的準則必要求這點:當神性說自己認識了時,應被領會為他使人認識。有福的使徒在寫信給加拉太人時採用了同樣的說法,說:「但從前你們不認識神的時候,是給那些本來不是神的作奴僕;現在你們既然認識神,更可說是被神所認識的」(加四8-9)。使徒說他們認識了神,這絕非虛假,然而他又彷彿要以隨後的句子把這話撤回:
Whence, because in God there abides by nature the immutable and eternal knowledge of all things, and it is impious to believe that the everlasting Godhead came to know anything in time; the rule of truth surely requires this, that when the divinity says it has come to know, it be understood that it makes one who knows. The blessed Apostle held the same mode of speech, writing to the Galatians and saying: «But then indeed, not knowing God, you served those which by nature are not gods. But now, since you have come to know God, or rather have been known by God» (Gal. 4:8-9). Where it was certainly not false that the Apostle said they had come to know God, and yet he wished as it were to remove this by the following sentence:
13:35
sed ne ipsam co­ gnitionem, non divino muneri vellent assignare, sed sibi; subsequenler Apostolus, illo quo diximus locu­ tionis modo, quo per efficientem ostenditur id quod efficitur, dixit cognitos esse a Deo : ostendens a Deo factum ut illi cognoscerent Deum. Deinde negare non potes Apostolum dixisse : Quoniam autem estis filii, misit Deus Spiritum Filii sui in corda nostra, da­ mantem : Abba, Pater (Ibid., 6). Quomodo ergo Spi­ ritus iste, qui Filius non est, sed' tamen Spiritus est veritatis, clamat Abba, Pater, nisi utique illo modo quo nos clamare facit ? Quod beatus Apostolus alio loco evidenter insinuat, dicens: Quotquot enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei.
但恐怕他們想把那認識歸於自己,而非歸於神的恩賜;使徒隨後便用我們所提到的那種說法——即藉致成者顯明被致成之事——說他們是「被神所認識的」:藉此顯明,他們認識神乃是神所成就的。其次,你不能否認使徒說過:「你們既為兒子,神就差他兒子的靈進入你們(我們)的心,呼叫:阿爸,父」(同上,6)。那麼,那位不是子、卻是真理之靈的靈,怎樣呼叫「阿爸,父」呢?豈非正是照他使我們呼叫的那種方式嗎?有福的使徒在另一處明顯地說清了這點,說:「因為凡被神的靈引導的,都是神的兒子。
but lest they should wish to assign that very knowledge not to the divine gift, but to themselves; the Apostle, following, in that mode of speech which we have mentioned, whereby through the efficient cause is shown what is effected, said that they had been «known by God»: showing that it was brought about by God that they should know God. Next, you cannot deny that the Apostle said: «And because you are sons, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying: Abba, Father» (ibid., 6). How then does that Spirit, who is not the Son, but nevertheless is the Spirit of truth, cry «Abba, Father», except surely in that manner in which he makes us cry? Which the blessed Apostle in another place evidently makes plain, saying: «For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
13:36
Non enim accepistis spi­ ritum servitutis iterum in timore, sed accepistis Spiri­ tum adoptionis filiorum, in quo clamamus: Abba, Pater (Rom. VIII, 15). Cernis nempe hoc esse Spiritui cla­ mare : Abba, Pater, quod clamare nos facit. Spiritus ergo sanctus propterea gemere et postulare dicitur, eo quod gemere et postulare nos faciat. Nam sicut Apostolus illud quod de Spiritu dixit, clamantem: AMa, Pater, clarius et manifestius exposuit, dicens, in quo clamamus : Abba, Pater; ita illud quod postu­ lare Spiritum dixit, similiter exposuit alio loco dicens: Orantes omni tempore in Spiritu, et in ipso vigilantes, in omni instantia et obsecratione (Ephes. VI, 18).
你們所受的,不是奴僕的心,仍舊害怕;所受的,乃是兒子名分的靈,因此我們呼叫:阿爸,父」(羅八14-15)。你確實看出,聖靈呼叫「阿爸,父」,就是使我們呼叫。所以,聖靈被說成歎息並祈求,正是因為他使我們歎息並祈求。因為使徒既把他所說「聖靈呼叫:阿爸,父」的話,更清楚明白地藉「因此我們呼叫:阿爸,父」加以闡明;照樣,他把所說聖靈祈求的話,也同樣在另一處闡明,說:「靠著聖靈隨時多方禱告祈求,並要在此警醒不倦,為眾聖徒祈求」(弗六18)。
For you have not received the spirit of bondage again unto fear, but you have received the Spirit of the adoption of sons, in whom we cry: Abba, Father» (Rom. 8:14-15). You perceive indeed that for the Spirit to cry «Abba, Father» is this: to make us cry. The Holy Spirit therefore is said to groan and to petition for this reason, because he makes us groan and petition. For just as the Apostle expounded more clearly and manifestly that which he had said of the Spirit, «crying: Abba, Father», by saying, «in whom we cry: Abba, Father»; so also that which he said of the Spirit petitioning he similarly expounded in another place, saying: «Praying at all times in the Spirit, and watching in him in all perseverance and supplication» (Eph. 6:18).
13:37
Ecce quemadmodum pro nobis postulat Spiritus, dum nos in Spiritu oramus : ecce quemadmodum pro nobis interpellat, dum nos in omni instantia et obsecratione in ipso Spiritu vigilamus. Spiritus enim sanctus, per quem cantas Dei diffunditur in cordibus nostris, facit nos gemere et postulare pro iniquitatibus nostris. Facit autem nos gemere, dura nos Cadit dolere iniqui­ tatem nostram, postulare veniam, desiderare justi­ tiam. Istud desiderium gemitumque ille dono sancti Spiritus acceperat, qui dicebat : Rugiebam a gemitu cordis mei; et, Ante te est omne desiderium meum, et gemitus meus a te noti est absconditus (Psal. XXXVII I 9, 10). 586 FRAGMENTUM VI.
看哪,當我們靠聖靈禱告時,聖靈怎樣為我們祈求:看哪,當我們在這同一位聖靈裡以恆切和祈求警醒時,他怎樣為我們代求。因為聖靈——神的愛藉他澆灌在我們心裡——使我們為自己的罪孽歎息並祈求。他使我們歎息,即使我們為自己的罪孽憂傷、祈求赦免、渴慕公義。那渴慕與歎息,是那位說以下話的人藉聖靈的恩賜所領受的:「我因心裡的歎息而唉哼」;又說:「我的心願都在你面前,我的歎息不向你隱瞞」(詩三十七9-10〔三十八8-9〕)。第六片段。
Behold how the Spirit petitions for us, while we pray in the Spirit: behold how he intercedes for us, while we watch in all perseverance and supplication in that same Spirit. For the Holy Spirit, through whom the charity of God is poured out in our hearts, makes us groan and petition for our iniquities. And he makes us groan, while he makes us grieve over our iniquity, petition pardon, desire righteousness. That desire and groaning he had received by the gift of the Holy Spirit, who said: «I roared with the groaning of my heart»; and, «Before you is all my desire, and my groaning is not hidden from you» (Ps. 37:9-10 [38:8-9]). FRAGMENT VI.
下一段 →
← 第 12 章第 14 章 →
12345678910111213141516

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。