📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 詞源與文集

塞維利亞的依西多祿

詞源與文集 第 1 章 第 6/8 段

拉丁文原文.34 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 1:171–1:204(全章共 270 節)

第 2 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
1:171
apud Grammaticos illa dicuntur, quae in eloquio cavere debemus. Sunt autem haec: barbarismus, soloecismus, acyrologia, cacenphaton, et reliqua. [2] Barbarismus est corruptio verbi unius. [Vt si tertiam syllabam quis producat in "ignoscere"] [3] Soloecismus conpositio vitiosa verborum. [Vt si aliquis dicat "inter hominibus" pro "inter homines"] [4]
是文法家所稱、我們在言語中應當防範的那些事。這些即是:字病(barbarismus)、語病(soloecismus)、用詞不當(acyrologia)、惡音(cacemphaton)等。〔2〕字病是單一字詞的訛誤(如有人把「ignoscere」的第三音節拉長)。〔3〕語病是字詞的錯誤結合(如有人說「inter hominibus」代「inter homines」)。〔4〕
are those things which, among the grammarians, are said to be what we ought to guard against in our speech. Now these are: barbarism, solecism, acyrologia, cacemphaton, and the rest. [2] Barbarism is the corruption of a single word (as if one should lengthen the third syllable in 'ignoscere'). [3] Solecism is the faulty joining of words (as if someone should say 'inter hominibus' for 'inter homines'). [4]
1:172
Acyrologia non propria dictio, ut (Lucan 2,15): Liceat sperare timenti. Proprium est autem timenti formidare, non sperare; et (Virg. Aen. 5,287): Gramineo in campo. Proprium est "graminosum dicere campum, non "gramineum" Cacemphaton dictio obscena vel inconposite sonans. [5] Obscena, ut (Virg. Aen. 1,579): His animum arrecti dictis. Inconposita,
用詞不當(acyrologia)是不恰當的措辭,如(盧坎《內戰記》二卷15行):「Liceat sperare timenti」(願恐懼者得以盼望)。然而,恐懼者本應是懼怕,而非盼望;又如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》五卷287行):「Gramineo in campo」(在草地上)。因為稱一片田地本應用「graminosum」,而非「gramineum」。惡音(cacemphaton)是猥褻或聽來不諧的措辭。〔5〕猥褻者,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》一卷579行):「His animum arrecti dictis」(因這些話而振奮精神)。不諧者,
Acyrologia is an improper expression, as (Lucan 2:15): 'Liceat sperare timenti' (Let the fearful be allowed to hope). But it is proper to the fearful to dread, not to hope; and (Virgil, Aeneid 5:287): 'Gramineo in campo' (on a grassy field). For it is proper to call a field 'graminosum,' not 'gramineum.' Cacemphaton is an obscene expression, or one that sounds uncouth. [5] Obscene, as (Virgil, Aeneid 1:579): 'His animum arrecti dictis' (roused in spirit by these words). Uncouth,
1:173
ut (Virg. Aen. 2,27): Iuvat ire et Dorica castra. Mala enim fuit conpositio ab ea syllaba incipere, qua superior finierat. [6] Pleonasmos adiectio unius verbi supervacua, ut (Virg. Georg. 2,1): Hactenus arvorum cultus et sidera caeli. Neque enim alibi nisi in caelo sunt sidera. [7] Perissologia adiectio plurimorum verborum supervacua, ut
如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》2.27):「樂於前往、觀看多利安人的營寨。」因為以前一字結尾的同一音節起頭,乃是拙劣的組合。[6] 冗詞(Pleonasmus)是多餘地增添一個字詞,如(維吉爾《農事詩》2.1):「至此已述田畝的耕作與天上的星辰。」因為星辰除天上外別無他處。[7] 贅語(Perissologia)是多餘地增添許多字詞,如
as in (Virgil, Aeneid 2.27): 'It is pleasing to go and see the Dorian camp.' For it was a poor arrangement to begin with the very syllable with which the preceding word had ended. [6] Pleonasm is the superfluous addition of a single word, as in (Virgil, Georgics 2.1): 'Thus far the tilling of the fields and the stars of heaven.' For the stars are nowhere except in heaven. [7] Perissologia is the superfluous addition of many words, as in
1:174
(Deuteron. 33,6): "vivat Ruben et non moriatur : dum non sit aliud vivere quam non mori. [8] Macrologia longiloquium, res non necessarias conprehendens, ut (Liv. frag. 64 M.): "Legati non inpetrata pace retro unde venerant domum reversi sunt" [9] Tautologia, idemloquium ut (Virg. Aen. 1,546): Si fata virum servant, si vescitur aura aetherea,
(申命記33:6):「願呂便存活、不至死亡」——因為存活無非就是不死。[8] 冗長語(Macrologia)是長篇累牘,涵括不必要之事,如(李維殘篇64 M.):「使節未能求得和平,便循原路退回,回到他們所來之家。」[9] 同義反覆(Tautologia)即重複說同一件事,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》1.546):「倘若命運護佑此人,倘若他仍呼吸著以太之氣,」
(Deuteronomy 33:6): 'Let Reuben live and not die' — since to live is nothing other than not to die. [8] Macrologia is long-windedness, embracing things that are not necessary, as in (Livy, fragment 64 M.): 'The envoys, peace not having been obtained, returned back home whence they had come.' [9] Tautology is saying the same thing, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 1.546): 'If the fates preserve the man, if he still feeds upon the ethereal air,'
1:175
neque adhuc crudelibus occubat umbris. Totum enim quod repetitur una res est, sed crebro sermone adnuntiata. [10] Eclipsis est defectus dictionis, in quo necessaria verba desunt, ut (Virg. Aen. 4,138): Cui pharetra ex auro: deest enim "erat" [11] Tapinosis est humilitas, statum rei magnae dictis infirmans, ut (Virg. Aen. 1,118): Apparent rari
尚未倒臥於殘酷的陰影之中。因為所重複的整體只是一事,只是以反覆的言辭宣說。[10] 省略(Eclipsis)是言辭的缺失,其中缺少必要的字詞,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》4.138):「其人有金製箭袋」——因為省略了「有」字。[11] 貶抑(Tapinosis)是貶低,以所用言辭削弱重大事物的地位,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》1.118):「稀疏可見」
and does not yet lie fallen among the cruel shades. For the whole of what is repeated is one single thing, but announced in repeated speech. [10] Ellipsis is a defect of expression in which necessary words are lacking, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 4.138): 'On whom a quiver of gold' — for the word 'was' is missing. [11] Tapinosis is a lowering, weakening the standing of a great matter by the words used, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 1.118): 'Here and there appear'
1:176
nantes in gurgite vasto. [12] "Gurgitem posuit pro "mare" Cacosyntheton, vitiosa conpositio verborum, ut (Virg. Aen. 9,609): Versaque iuvencum terga fatigamus hasta. [13] Amphibolia, ambigua dictio, quae fit aut per casum accusativum, ut illud responsum Apollinis ad Pyrrhum (Enn. Ann. 179): Aio te, Aeacida, Romanos vincere posse. In quo non est
〔眾人〕在浩瀚的漩渦中泅泳。[12] 他以「漩渦」代替「海」。惡構(Cacosyntheton)是字詞的錯誤安排,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》9.609):「我們以倒轉的矛使公牛的背疲乏。」[13] 歧義(Amphibolia)是含糊的表達,或因受格而生,如阿波羅對皮洛士的那則神諭(恩尼烏斯《編年史》179):「我說你,埃阿科斯之裔,羅馬人能夠戰勝。」其中並不
[men] swimming in the vast whirlpool. [12] He put 'whirlpool' for 'sea.' Cacosyntheton is a faulty arrangement of words, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 9.609): 'And we weary the backs of the bullocks with the turned spear.' [13] Amphibolia is ambiguous expression, which arises either through the accusative case, as in that reply of Apollo to Pyrrhus (Ennius, Annals 179): 'I say that you, son of Aeacus, the Romans can conquer.' In which it is not
1:177
certum, quem in ipso versu monstraverit esse victorem. [14] Fit et per incertam distinctionem, ut (Virg. Aen. 1,263): Bellum ingens geret Italia. Incerta distinctio, utrum "bellum ingens" an "ingens Italia" [15] Fit et per commune verbum, ut: "Deprecatur Cato, caiumniatur Cicero, praestolatur Brutus, dedignatur Antonius ; nec ostenditur in hac
確定,那詩句本身所指出的勝者究竟是哪一方。[14] 歧義也因不確定的斷句而生,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》1.263):「他將在義大利掀起一場巨大的戰爭。」斷句不確定,究竟是「巨大的戰爭」抑或「巨大的義大利」。[15] 歧義也因共通語態的動詞而生,如:「加圖懇求,西塞羅控告,布魯圖斯等候,安東尼不屑」;在此並未顯明
certain which of the two that very verse has shown to be the victor. [14] It also arises through uncertain punctuation, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 1.263): 'He will wage a mighty war in Italy.' The punctuation is uncertain, whether 'a mighty war' or 'mighty Italy.' [15] It also arises through a verb of common voice, as in: 'Cato entreats, Cicero accuses, Brutus awaits, Antonius disdains'; nor is it shown in this
1:178
ambiguitate utrum ipsi alios, an alii ipsos deprecati sunt aut calumniati. [16] Fit et per homonyma, quo uno nomine multa significantur, ut "acies" et non addas aut ferri, aut oculorum, aut militum. XXXV. DE METAPLASMIS. [1] Metaplasmus Graeca lingua, Latine transformatio dicitur. Qui fit in uno verbo propter metri necessitatem et licentiam
歧義中,究竟是他們懇求或控告他人,抑或他人懇求或控告他們。[16] 歧義也因同名異義詞而生,即以一個詞指涉多種事物,如「acies」一詞,若你不加上「刀鋒」「眼睛」或「軍陣」〔便含糊不清〕。第三十五章 論變形(De metaplasmis)。[1] Metaplasmus 在希臘語中,拉丁語稱為「變形」(transformatio)。它發生於單一字詞之上,乃因格律的需要與詩人的
ambiguity whether they entreated or accused others, or others [entreated or accused] them. [16] It also arises through homonyms, whereby many things are signified by a single word, as 'acies' when you do not add either 'of the sword-edge,' or 'of the eyes,' or 'of the battle-line.' XXXV. ON METAPLASMS. [1] Metaplasm in the Greek tongue is called 'transformation' in Latin. It occurs within a single word on account of the necessity of the meter and the license
1:179
poetarum; cuius species istae sunt. [2] Prothesis adpositio in principio verbi, ut ["gnato" pro "nato et "tetulit" pro "tulit "]. Epenthesis adpositio in medium, ut (Virg. Aen. 3,409): Maneant in relligione nepotes, pro "religione" ["relliquias" pro "reliquias" "induperator" pro "inperator". [3] Paragoge adpositio in finem, ut ["admittier" pro
詩人的自由。其種類如下。[2] 前加音(Prothesis)是在字首增添,如以「gnato」代「nato」(所生者),以「tetulit」代「tulit」(他攜帶)。中加音(Epenthesis)是在字中增添,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》3.409):「願你的後裔常存於敬虔(relligione)」,乃代「religione」;又如以「relliquias」代「reliquias」,以「induperator」代「imperator」。[3] 尾加音(Paragoge)是在字尾增添,如以「admittier」代
license of the poets; and its species are these. [2] Prothesis is an addition at the beginning of a word, as 'gnato' for 'nato' (born) and 'tetulit' for 'tulit' (he bore). Epenthesis is an addition in the middle, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 3.409): 'Let your descendants abide in religion (relligione),' for 'religione'; and 'relliquias' for 'reliquias,' 'induperator' for 'imperator.' [3] Paragoge is an addition at the end, as 'admittier' for
1:180
"admitti" "magis" pro "mage et "potestur" pro "potest". Aphaeresis abscisio de principio, ut "temno" pro "contemno" Syncope abscisio de medio, ut "forsan" pro "forsitan" Apocope abscisio de fine, ut "sat" pro "satis" [4] Ectasis, productio contra naturam, ut (Virg. Aen. 1,499): "exercet Diana choros". (Virg. Aen. 1,2): "Italiam fato" quum
「admitti」,以「magis」代「mage」,以「potestur」代「potest」。減首音(Aphaeresis)是從字首刪削,如以「temno」代「contemno」(我輕視)。減中音(Syncope)是從字中刪削,如以「forsan」代「forsitan」(或許)。減尾音(Apocope)是從字尾刪削,如以「sat」代「satis」(足夠)。[4] 延長(Ectasis)是違反本性的音節加長,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》1.499):「狄安娜引領群舞(exercet)」;(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》1.2):「Italiam fato」,雖然
'admitti,' 'magis' for 'mage,' and 'potestur' for 'potest.' Aphaeresis is a cutting off from the beginning, as 'temno' for 'contemno' (I despise). Syncope is a cutting off from the middle, as 'forsan' for 'forsitan' (perhaps). Apocope is a cutting off from the end, as 'sat' for 'satis' (enough). [4] Ectasis is a lengthening contrary to nature, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 1.499): 'Diana leads (exercet) the dances'; (Virgil, Aeneid 1.2): 'Italiam fato,' when
1:181
"Italiam correpte dici debeat. Systole correptio contra naturam, ut (Virg. Aen. 6,773): "urbemque Fidenam" cum prima syllaba produci debet. Vt quum dicimus "Orion correpte, dum producte dici oportet.] Diaeresis discissio syllabae in duas, ut (Virg. Aen. 9,26): "dives pictai vestis" pro "pictae" (Enn. Ann. 33): "Albai longai" pro "Albae longae".
「Italiam」本應以短音節讀出〔卻被讀長〕。縮短(Systole)是違反本性的音節縮短,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》6.773):「以及斐德那城(Fidenam)」,其第一音節本應讀長;又如我們把「Orion」讀短,雖然本應讀長。變二合音(Diaeresis)是把一音節拆為二,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》9.26):「dives pictai vestis」(華服之富麗)以代「pictae」;(恩尼烏斯《編年史》33):「Albai longai」以代「Albae longae」。
'Italiam' ought to be pronounced with a short syllable. Systole is a shortening contrary to nature, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 6.773): 'and the city Fidena,' when the first syllable ought to be lengthened; as when we say 'Orion' with a short syllable, though it ought to be pronounced long. Diaeresis is the splitting of a syllable into two, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 9.26): 'dives pictai vestis' (rich in embroidered raiment) for 'pictae'; (Ennius, Annals 33): 'Albai longai' for 'Albae longae.'
1:182
[5] Episynaloephe conglutinatio duarum [syllabarum] in unam, ut "Phaethon" pro "Phaëthon" "Neri" pro "Nereï" "aeripedem" pro "aëripedem". Synaloephe conlisio vocalium adiuncta vocalibus, ut (Virg. Aen. 9,1): Atque ea diversa penitus dum parte geruntur]. [6] Ec(th)lipsis conlisio consonantium cum vocalibus, ut (Virg. Aen. 1,3):
[5] 合二為一音(Episynaloephe)是把兩個〔音節〕黏合為一,如以「Phaethon」代「Pha-ethon」,以「Neri」代「Nerei」,以「aeripedem」代「a-eripedem」。母音合略(Synaloephe)是相鄰母音的省併,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》9.1):「而當這些事在遙遠的另一方進行時。」[6] 子音省併(Ecthlipsis)是子音與母音的省併,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》1.3):
[5] Episynaloephe is the gluing together of two [syllables] into one, as 'Phaethon' for 'Pha-ethon,' 'Neri' for 'Nerei,' 'aeripedem' for 'a-eripedem.' Synaloephe is the elision of vowels joined to vowels, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 9.1): 'And while these things are carried on in a far distant quarter.' [6] Ecthlipsis is the elision of consonants with vowels, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 1.3):
1:183
Multum ille et terris igctatus et alto]. Antithesis contrapositio litterae pro alia littera, ut ["inpete" pro "impetu ) ["olli" pro "illi". Metathesis transpositio litterae, ut ["Thymbre" pro "Thymber" ["Evandre" pro "Evander". [7] Inter barbarismum et figuras, hoc est Latinam et perfectam elocutionem, metaplasmum esse, qui in uno sermone fit
「他在陸上與深海飽經顛沛。」對換(Antithesis)是以一字母替代另一字母,如以「inpete」代「impetu」,以「olli」代「illi」。換位(Metathesis)是字母的移位,如以「Thymbre」代「Thymber」,以「Evandre」代「Evander」。[7] 〔當知〕在野蠻語病(barbarismus)與修辭格之間——即在合乎拉丁規範的完美措辭之間——存在著變形(metaplasmus),它發生於單一字詞之中
'Much was he buffeted both on lands and on the deep.' Antithesis is the substitution of one letter for another, as 'inpete' for 'impetu,' 'olli' for 'illi.' Metathesis is the transposition of a letter, as 'Thymbre' for 'Thymber,' 'Evandre' for 'Evander.' [7] [It should be understood that] between barbarism and the figures — that is, between correct and perfect diction — stands the metaplasm, which occurs within a single word
1:184
oratione vitiosus. Item inter soloecismum et schema, id est perfectam sermonum conexionem, figura est, quae fit contextu sermonum oratione vitiosa. Ergo metaplasmi [et] schemata media sunt et discernuntur peritia et inperitia. Fiunt autem ad ornatum. XXXVI. DE SCHEMATIBVS. [1] Schemata ex Graeco in Latinum eloquium figurae interpretantur, quae
以有瑕的措辭〔造成〕。同樣,在文法錯構(soloecismus)與修辭格(schema)之間——即在字詞的完美連綴之間——存在著格式(figura),它以有瑕的措辭在字詞的連綴中造成。因此,變形與修辭格居於中間,並以技巧之有無而區分。然而它們的運用乃為修飾。第三十六章 論修辭格(De schematibus)。[1] Schemata 由希臘語譯入拉丁語即「格式」(figurae),它們
with faulty diction. Likewise, between solecism and schema — that is, the perfect connection of words — stands the figure, which occurs in the joining of words with faulty diction. Therefore metaplasms [and] schemata are intermediate, and are distinguished by skill and lack of skill. But they are employed for adornment. XXXVI. ON FIGURES (SCHEMATA). [1] 'Schemata' is rendered from Greek into Latin speech as 'figures,' which
1:185
fiunt in verbis vel sententiis per varias dictionum formas propter eloquii ornamentum. Haec dum multae sint apud Grammaticos, istae inveniuntur. [2] Prolempsis est praesumptio, ubi ea, quae sequi debent, anteponuntur, ut (Virg. Aen. 12,161): Interea reges ingenti mole Latinus. Debuit enim sic dicere: "Interea reges ingenti mole" et statim adicere,
藉各種措辭形式,發生於字詞或語句之中,為修飾言辭之用。此類雖在文法家中甚多,茲舉如下。[2] 預敘(Prolempsis)是預先提及,即把本應後出之事置於先,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》12.161):「其時,眾王以浩大陣勢,拉丁努斯……」他本應如此說:「其時,眾王以浩大陣勢」,隨即補上
occur in words or sentences through various forms of expression for the sake of adorning the discourse. Although these are many among the grammarians, the following are found. [2] Prolepsis is anticipation, where those things which ought to follow are placed first, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 12.161): 'Meanwhile the kings, in mighty array, Latinus...' For he ought to have said thus: 'Meanwhile the kings, in mighty array,' and at once added
1:186
quod sequitur: "procedunt castris" deinde dicere: "Latinus" etc.; sed facta est pro ornamento praesumptio rei, et qui sequi debuerunt reges interpositi sunt in septem versibus, et postea additum est: "Procedunt castris" Inde et praesumptio, quia anteposita sunt quae sequi debuerunt. [3] Zeugma est clausula, quum plures sensus uno verbo clauduntur,
隨後之語:「他們自營中出發」,然後再說:「拉丁努斯」云云;但為修飾之故,乃將此事預先提出,而本應後出的眾王,卻插敘於七行詩句之中,其後才補上:「他們自營中出發」。因此稱為「預敘」,因為本應後出之語被置於先。[3] 軛式(Zeugma)是一種收束句法,當數個意念由一個動詞收束時,
what follows: 'they advance from the camp,' and then to say: 'Latinus,' and so on; but for the sake of adornment an anticipation of the matter was made, and the kings, who ought to have followed, were inserted within seven verses, and afterward was added: 'They advance from the camp.' Hence too it is called 'anticipation,' because those things which ought to have followed were placed first. [3] Zeugma is a clause, when several senses are closed off by a single word,
1:187
quae fit tribus modis. Nam aut in primo, aut in postremo, aut in medio id verbum ponitur, quod sententias iungit. In primo, ut (Lucil. 139): Vertitur oenophoris fundus, sententia nobis. In medio [ut] (Enn. Ann. 329): Graecia Sulpicio sorti data, Gallia Cottae. In postremo, [ut] (Ter. Andr. 68): Namque hoc tempore obsequium amicos, veritas odium
此格有三種方式。即那連結諸句的動詞,或置於首,或置於末,或置於中。置於首,如(盧奇利烏斯139):「酒甕的底翻轉了,我們的心意〔也翻轉了〕。」置於中,如(恩尼烏斯《編年史》329):「希臘以籤分予蘇爾皮奇烏斯,高盧分予科塔。」置於末,如(泰倫提烏斯《安德羅斯女子》68):「因為此時逢迎〔博得〕朋友,真話〔招來〕怨恨」
which occurs in three ways. For that word which joins the clauses is placed either at the beginning, or at the end, or in the middle. At the beginning, as in (Lucilius 139): 'The bottom is turned in the wine-jars, and our resolve [turned] for us.' In the middle, as in (Ennius, Annals 329): 'Greece was given by lot to Sulpicius, Gaul to Cotta.' At the end, as in (Terence, Andria 68): 'For at this time compliance [begets] friends, truth [begets] hatred'
1:188
parit. [4] Hypozeuxis est figura superiori contraria, ubi in singulis sensibus propria unicuique clausula est, ut (Virg. Aen. 10,149): Regem adit et regi memorat nomenque genusque. [5] Syllempsis est in dissimilibus clausulis aut pluralis dictio singulari verbo finita, ut (Virg. Aen. 1,553): Sociis et rege recepto, aut singularis dictio plurali
招致。[4] 分軛(Hypozeuxis)是與前一格相反的修辭格,即各個意念各有其專屬的句子,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》10.149):「他來到王前,向王陳述自己的名字與家世。」[5] 兼用(Syllempsis)出現於不相似的句子中,或為複數的表述以單數動詞收束,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》1.553):「同伴與王皆已尋回,」或為單數的表述以複數
begets. [4] Hypozeuxis is a figure contrary to the preceding, where in individual clauses each has its own proper phrase, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 10.149): 'He approaches the king, and to the king he recounts his name and lineage.' [5] Syllepsis, in dissimilar clauses, is either a plural expression completed by a singular verb, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 1.553): 'his companions and the king being recovered,' or a singular expression by a plural
1:189
verbo expleta, ut (Virg. Ecl. 1,81): Sunt nobis mitia poma, et pressi copia lactis. Supra enim "sunt dixit. Hic debuit dicere: "est et pressi copia lactis" [6] Fit autem Syllempsis non solum per partes orationis, sed et per accidentia partibus. Nam ubi et pro multis unus et pro uno multi ponuntur, Syllempsis est. Pro multis unus, ut est illud
動詞完足,如(維吉爾《牧歌》1.81):「我們有甘美的果子,又有豐盛的乳酪。」因為上文他用了複數的「有」(sunt)。此處他本應說:「又有(單數 est)豐盛的乳酪。」[6] 兼用不僅藉詞類而生,也藉詞類的屬性而生。因為凡以一代多、以多代一之處,即是兼用。以一代多,如那句
verb completed, as in (Virgil, Eclogues 1.81): 'We have mellow apples, and abundance of pressed cheese.' For above he said 'sunt' (there are). Here he ought to have said: 'there is (est) also an abundance of pressed cheese.' [6] Syllepsis occurs not only through the parts of speech, but also through the accidents of the parts. For where one is put for many and many for one, there is syllepsis. One for many, as in that passage
1:190
(Virg. Aen. 2,20): Vterumque armato milite conplent, cum non uno, sed multis militibus. Item pro uno multi, ut in Evangelio (Matth. 27,44): "Latrones qui crucifixi erant cum eo improperabant" ubi pro uno uterque inducitur blasphemasse. [7] Anadiplosis est, quando ab eodem verbo quo prior versus finivit, sequens versus incipit, ut est illud (Virg.
(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》2.20):「他們以武裝的兵士填滿〔木馬的〕腹腔」,雖非以一名、乃以眾多兵士。同樣以多代一,如福音書中(馬太福音27:44):「那與他同釘十字架的強盜也譏誚他」,此處以複數表述,將二人皆說成曾出言褻瀆,實則只一人。[7] 頂真(Anadiplosis)是後一詩行以前一詩行結尾的同一字詞起頭,如那句(維吉爾
(Virgil, Aeneid 2.20): 'And they fill the belly [of the horse] with armed soldiery,' although not with one, but with many soldiers. Likewise many for one, as in the Gospel (Matthew 27:44): 'The thieves who were crucified with him reviled him,' where by the plural both are represented as having blasphemed, though it was but one. [7] Anadiplosis is when the following verse begins with the same word with which the preceding verse ended, as in that passage (Virgil,
1:191
Ecl. 8,55): Certent et cygnis ululae, sit Tityrus Orpheus, Orpheus in silvis, inter delphinas Arion. [8] Anaphora est repetitio eiusdem verbi per principia versuum plurimorum, ut (Virg. Aen. 3,157): Nos te Dardania incensa tuaque arma secuti, nos tumidum sub te permensi classibus aequor. [9] Epanaphora est in uno versu per principia sensuum
《牧歌》8.55):「願梟鳥與天鵝爭鳴,願提屠魯斯成為俄耳甫斯——林中的俄耳甫斯,海豚間的阿里翁。」[8] 首語重複(Anaphora)是在多行詩句的開頭重複同一字詞,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》3.157):「我們,曾在達達尼亞焚燒之際追隨你與你的干戈;我們,曾在你的率領下以艦隊橫渡洶湧的海洋。」[9] 句中首語重複(Epanaphora)是在同一詩行中,於各意念單元的開頭
Eclogues 8.55): 'Let owls vie even with swans, let Tityrus be Orpheus — Orpheus in the woods, Arion among the dolphins.' [8] Anaphora is the repetition of the same word at the beginnings of many verses, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 3.157): 'We, having followed you when Dardania was set ablaze, and your arms; we, having traversed under your lead the swelling sea with our fleets.' [9] Epanaphora is, within a single verse, at the beginnings of the sense-units
1:192
eiusdem verbi repetitio, ut (Virg. Aen. 7,759): Te nemus Anguitiae, vitrea te Focinus unda, te liquidi flevere lacus. [10] Epizeuxis in uno sensu congeminatio verbi, ut (Virg. Aen. 4,660): Sic sic iuvat ire per umbras. [11] Epanalempsis est sermonis in principio versus positi eiusdem in fine replicatio, ut est illud (Juven. 14,139): Crescit amor
重複同一字詞,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》7.759):「你,安古伊提亞的樹林;你,福奇努斯清澈的水波;你,澄明的湖泊,都為之哀哭。」[10] 疊字(Epizeuxis)是在同一意念中疊用一字,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》4.660):「如此,如此,我樂於步入幽冥。」[11] 首尾同語(Epanalempsis)是把置於詩行開頭之字詞於行末再現,如那句(尤維納利斯14.139):「對錢財的貪愛」
the repetition of the same word, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 7.759): 'You the grove of Anguitia, you Fucinus with its glassy wave, you the clear lakes bewept.' [10] Epizeuxis is the doubling of a word within a single sense, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 4.660): 'Thus, thus it pleases me to go among the shades.' [11] Epanalepsis is the repetition, at the end, of a word placed at the beginning of a verse, as in that passage (Juvenal 14.139): 'The love of'
1:193
nummi quantum ipsa pecunia crescit. [12] Paronomasia est in significatione diversa dictio pene ipsa, ut illud: "Abire an obire te convenit? id est exulem fieri, an mori. [13] Schesis onomaton multitudo nominum coniunctorum quodam ambitu copulata, ut: Nubila, nix, grando, procellae, fulmina, venti. [14] Paromoeon est multitudo verborum ex una
隨錢財本身增長而增長。[12] 諧音雙關(Paronomasia)是幾近相同、而意義相異的字詞,如:「你當離去(abire)抑或死去(obire)?」即成為流亡者,抑或死亡。[13] 名詞連綴(Schesis onomaton)是眾多名詞聯結成串,於某一範圍內相繫,如:「雲、雪、雹、暴風、雷電、狂風。」[14] 同首音(Paromoeon)是眾多字詞出自同一
money grows as much as the wealth itself grows. [12] Paronomasia is a nearly identical word with a different meaning, as in: 'Is it fitting for you to go away (abire) or to die (obire)?' that is, to become an exile, or to die. [13] Schesis onomaton is a multitude of nouns joined together, linked within a certain compass, as in: 'Clouds, snow, hail, storms, thunderbolts, winds.' [14] Paromoeon is a multitude of words beginning from one
1:194
littera inchoantium, quale est apud Ennium (Ann. 109): O Tite tute Tati tibi tanta tyranne tulisti. Sed bene hoc temperat Virgilius, dum non toto versu utitur hanc figuram, ut Ennius, sed nunc in principio versus tantum, ut est illud (Aen. 1,295): Saeva sedens super arma; nunc autem in fine, ut (Aen. 3,183): Sola mihi tales casus Cassandra
同一字母起頭,如恩尼烏斯(《編年史》109)中所見:「啊,提圖斯·塔提烏斯,你這暴君,竟給自己招來如此重大的禍患。」然而維吉爾善加節制,他不像恩尼烏斯那樣通篇整行運用此格,而是時而僅置於行首,如那句(《埃涅阿斯紀》1.295):「兇殘地坐在兵器之上」;時而置於行末,如(《埃涅阿斯紀》3.183):「唯有卡珊德拉曾向我〔預告〕這樣的災殃,」
letter, such as is found in Ennius (Annals 109): 'O Titus Tatius, tyrant, such great sufferings did you yourself bring upon yourself.' But Virgil tempers this well, since he does not use this figure throughout a whole verse, as Ennius does, but now only at the beginning of a verse, as in that passage (Aeneid 1.295): 'Sitting savage upon his arms'; and now at the end, as (Aeneid 3.183): 'Cassandra alone [foretold] to me such calamities,'
1:195
canebat. [15] Homoeoptoton est, quum plurima nomina per unum casum denuntiantur, ut illud (Virg. Aen. 12,903): Sed neque currentem, sed nec cognoscit euntem, tollentemque manu saxumque inmane moventem. [16] Homoeon teleuton est, quum uno modo verba plurima finiuntur, ut (Cic. Catil. 2,1): "abiit, abcessit, evasit, erupit" [17] Polyptoton est, cum
歌詠。[15] 同格(Homoeoptoton)是眾多名詞以同一格陳述,如那句(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》12.903):「但他不論奔跑、行走,不論以手舉起並搬動那巨石,都認不出自己。」[16] 同尾(Homoeoteleuton)是眾多字詞以同一方式結尾,如(西塞羅《反喀提林》2.1):「他去了、走了、逃了、竄了。」[17] 多格變化(Polyptoton)是
was singing. [15] Homoeoptoton is when many nouns are declared in a single case, as in that passage (Virgil, Aeneid 12.903): 'But neither running nor going does he recognize himself, nor lifting the huge stone with his hand and moving it.' [16] Homoeoteleuton is when many words end in one and the same way, as in (Cicero, Against Catiline 2.1): 'he has gone, departed, escaped, broken forth.' [17] Polyptoton is when
1:196
diversis casibus sententia variatur, ut (Pers. 3,84): Ex nihilo nihilum, ad nihilum nil posse reverti. et (Pers. 5,79): Marci Dama. Papae! Marco spondente, recusas? Marcus dixit. Ita est. Adsigna, Marce, tabellas. [18] Hirmos est sententia continuatae orationis tenorem suum usque ad ultimum servans, ut (Virg. Aen. 1,159): Est in secessu longo
同一語句以不同的格變化,如(佩爾西烏斯3.84):「從無中生無,歸於無中無物能返。」又如(佩爾西烏斯5.79):「馬爾庫斯的〔奴僕〕達馬。好啊!馬爾庫斯既作保,你還推辭?馬爾庫斯已發話。就這麼定了。馬爾庫斯,簽下契牘吧。」[18] 連貫句(Hirmos)是連續行文的語句,自始至終保持其一貫語氣,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》1.159):「在一處幽深的港灣裡有
a sentence is varied by different cases, as in (Persius 3.84): 'From nothing nothing [comes], and to nothing nothing can return.' and (Persius 5.79): 'Dama, [slave] of Marcus. Bravo! With Marcus standing surety, do you refuse? Marcus has spoken. So it is. Sign the tablets, Marcus.' [18] Hirmos is a sentence of continuous discourse that preserves its own tenor all the way to the end, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 1.159): 'There is in a long recess'
1:197
locus, insula portum, et reliqua. Hinc enim in longum vadit sensus usque ad illud (Virg. Aen. 1,165): Horrentique atrum nemus inminet umbris. [19] Polysyntheton est dictio multis concatenata coniunctionibus, ut (Virg. Georg. 3,344): Tectumque, laremque, armaque, Amicleumque canem. [20] Dialyton vel asyntheton est figura, quae e contrario sine
一處地方,一座島嶼〔形成〕港口,如此云云。因為自此意思綿延而下,直到那句(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》1.165):「一片幽暗的樹林以森然的陰影俯臨。」[19] 多連詞(Polysyntheton)是以許多連接詞串連的表述,如(維吉爾《農事詩》3.344):「他的居所、他的家神、他的兵器,還有他阿米克萊的獵犬。」[20] 無連詞(Dialyton 或 asyndeton)是與此相反的修辭格,不用
a place, an island [forming] a harbor, and the rest. For from here the sense proceeds at length up to that verse (Virgil, Aeneid 1.165): 'And a dark grove looms with bristling shades.' [19] Polysyndeton is an expression linked together by many conjunctions, as in (Virgil, Georgics 3.344): 'His dwelling, and his household god, and his arms, and his Amyclaean dog.' [20] Dialyton or asyndeton is a figure which, on the contrary, without
1:198
coniunctionibus solute ac simpliciter effertur, ut: "Venimus, vidimus, placuit" [21] Antitheton, ubi contraria contrariis opponuntur et sententiae pulchritudinem reddunt, ut illud (Ovid, Met. 1,19): Frigida pugnabant calidis, humentia siccis: mollia cum duris: sine pondere habentia pondus. [22] Hypallage, quotienscumque per contrarium verba
連接詞,鬆散而樸直地道出,如:「我們來了,我們看見了,我們喜悅了。」[21] 對比(Antitheton)是以相反之事對舉相反之事,而使語句生美,如那句(奧維德《變形記》1.19):「冷與熱相爭,濕與乾相鬥,柔與剛相抗,無重者與有重者相對。」[22] 換位修辭(Hypallage)是每逢藉相反方式,將字詞
conjunctions is uttered loosely and plainly, as: 'We came, we saw, it pleased us.' [21] Antitheton is where contraries are set against contraries and render the sentence beautiful, as in that passage (Ovid, Metamorphoses 1.19): 'Cold things fought with hot, moist with dry, soft with hard, things without weight with things having weight.' [22] Hypallage is whenever, by way of the contrary, words
1:199
intelleguntur, ut (Virg. Aen. 3,61): Dare classibus Austros, cum ventis naves demus, non navibus ventos. XXXVII. DE TROPIS. [1] Tropos Graeco nomine Grammatici vocant, qui Latine modi locutionum interpretantur. Fiunt autem a propria significatione ad non propriam similitudinem. Quorum omnium nomina difficillimum est adnotare, sed ex omnibus
〔如此〕理解,如(維吉爾《埃涅阿斯紀》3.61):「把南風賜給艦隊」,實則我們把船交給風,而非把風交給船。第三十七章 論轉義(De tropis)。[1] 文法家以希臘語稱之為「轉義」(tropos),拉丁語譯作「表達的方式」。它們由本義轉向非本義的相似。要一一記下它們全部的名稱極為困難,但在其中
are understood, as in (Virgil, Aeneid 3.61): 'To give the south winds to the fleets,' whereas we give the ships to the winds, not the winds to the ships. XXXVII. ON TROPES. [1] Grammarians call by the Greek name 'tropes' what in Latin are rendered 'modes of expression.' They arise from a proper signification to a non-proper likeness. To note down the names of them all is most difficult, but out of them all
1:200
Donatus tredecim usui tradenda conscripsit. [2] Metaphora est verbi alicuius usurpata translatio, sicut cum dicimus "fluctuare segetes" "gemmare vites" dum in his rebus fluctus et gemmas non invenimus, in quibus haec verba aliunde transferuntur. Sed hac atque aliae tropicae locutiones ad ea, quae intellegenda sunt, propterea figuratis amictibus
多納圖斯記下十三種供實用之傳授。[2] 隱喻(Metaphora)是某字詞的借用移轉,如我們說「莊稼翻湧」「葡萄結珠」,而這些事物本身並無波濤與寶珠,這些字詞乃是從別處移轉而來。然而此類及其他轉義的說法,正是為了使當被理解之事〔鍛鍊讀者之思〕,才披上比喻的外衣
Donatus wrote down thirteen to be handed on for use. [2] Metaphor is the borrowed transfer of some word, as when we say 'the crops billow,' 'the vines bud with gems,' since in these things we find neither billows nor gems, into which these words are transferred from elsewhere. But this and other tropical expressions, in order that the things to be understood [may exercise the reader], are for that reason clothed in figurative garb
1:201
obteguntur, ut sensus legentis exerceant, et ne nuda atque in promptu vilescant. [3] Fiunt autem metaphorae modis quattuor: ab animali ad animate, ut: Aligeros conscendit equos. Metaphorice loquens miscuit quadrupedi alas avis, et (Virg. Ecl. 6,80): Quo cursu deserta petiverit; miscuit volatili cursum quadrupedis. Ab inanimali ad inanimale, ut
被遮蔽,以鍛鍊讀者的悟性,並免得它們赤裸現成而流於卑俗。[3] 隱喻有四種造法:由有生轉有生,如:「他跨上生翼的駿馬。」如此比喻地說,他把鳥的翅膀混入四足獸;又如(維吉爾《牧歌》6.80):「她以何等奔馳趨向荒野」——他把〔四足獸的〕奔馳混入飛禽。由無生轉無生,如:
and covered over, so that they may exercise the reader's understanding, and lest, being naked and ready to hand, they become cheap. [3] Metaphors are made in four ways: from the animate to the animate, as: 'He mounts the wing-bearing horses.' Speaking metaphorically, he mixed the wings of a bird with a quadruped; and (Virgil, Eclogues 6.80): 'By what course she sought the wastelands' — he mixed the running [of a quadruped] with a flying creature. From the inanimate to the inanimate, as:
1:202
Pontum pinus arat, sulcum premit alta carina. Miscuit usum terrae aquis, dum arare et sulcum premere ad terram pertineat, non ad mare. [4] Ab inanimali ad animale, ut "florida iuventus : miscuit flores inanimales iuventuti, quae animam habet. Ab animali ad inanimale, ut: Tu, Neptune pater, cui tempora cana crepanti cincta salo resonant, magnus
「松木犁開大海,深沉的龍骨壓出犁溝。」他把陸上的作為混入水中,因為犁地與壓出犁溝屬於陸地,不屬於大海。[4] 由無生轉有生,如「花樣年華」:他把無生的花朵混入有靈魂的青春。由有生轉無生,如:「你啊,涅普頓父神,你那斑白的鬢角,為喧響的鹹濤所環繞而迴鳴,偉大的」
'The pine ploughs the sea, the deep keel presses a furrow.' He mixed the practice of the land with the waters, since to plough and to press a furrow pertains to the land, not to the sea. [4] From the inanimate to the animate, as 'flowering youth': he mixed inanimate flowers with youth, which possesses a soul. From the animate to the inanimate, as: 'You, father Neptune, whose hoary temples, girded by the resounding brine, resound — great',
1:203
cui perpete mento profluit Oceanus, et flumina crinibus errant. Mentum enim, tempora et crines non ad Oceanum pertinent, sed ad homines. [5] Sic et alia rerum nomina de alio genere in aliud genus decentissime decoris gratia transferuntur, ut oratio perornetur. Metaphora autem aut partis unius est, ut "fluctuare segetes (non potes dicere
你那長流不息的下顎湧出大洋,江河在你的髮間漫遊。」因為下顎、鬢角與頭髮並不屬於大洋,而屬於人。[5] 如此,其他事物的名稱也極為得體地為修飾之故從一類轉入另一類,使言辭更臻華美。然而隱喻或只是單向的,如「莊稼翻湧」(你卻不能說
you from whose everlasting chin Ocean flows forth, and rivers wander through your hair.' For the chin, the temples, and the hair pertain not to Ocean, but to human beings. [5] Thus other names of things too are most fittingly transferred from one class into another class, for the sake of ornament, so that the discourse may be thoroughly adorned. But a metaphor is either of one direction only, as 'the crops billow' (you cannot say
1:204
"segetare fluctus ), aut antistropha est, id est reciproca, ut "remigium alarum" Nam et alae navium et alarum remigia dicuntur. [6] Catachresis est alienae rei nomen adpositum. Haec et a metaphora differt, quod illa vocabulum habenti largitur, haec, quia non habet proprium, alieno utitur, ut (Virg. Georg. 2,131): Faciemque simillima lauro; et
「波濤成莊稼」),或為可逆的(antistropha),即雙向,如「翅膀的槳運」。因為船的翅膀(船槳)與翅膀的槳運兩者都可說。[6] 濫用移名(Catachresis)是把外物的名稱借用〔於另一物〕。它與隱喻的區別在於:隱喻是賦予本已有名之物〔另一名〕,而此格則因某物本無專名,乃借用他物之名,如(維吉爾《農事詩》2.131):「其外貌與月桂極為相似」;又
'the waves crop' [as though billowing like grain]), or it is antistrophic, that is, reciprocal, as 'the oarage of wings.' For both the wings of ships and the oarage of wings are spoken of. [6] Catachresis is the name of a foreign thing applied [to another]. It differs from metaphor in this: that metaphor bestows [a word] upon something that already has one, whereas this, because it has no proper term, uses an alien one, as in (Virgil, Georgics 2.131): 'And in appearance most like the laurel'; and
← 上一段下一段 →
第 2 章 →
123456789101112131415161718192021222324