📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 反亞流神學文集

反亞流神學文集 第 2 章 第 5/10 段

拉丁文原文.37 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 2:151–2:187(全章共 361 節)

← 第 1 章第 3 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
2:151
Quis enim scit hominum quæ sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in ipso est ? ita et quæ Dei sunt nemo cognovit, nisi Spiritus Dei (I Cor. II, 11). De ipso dicit idem gentium Doctor : Nobis enim re­ velavit Deus per Spiritum suum (Ibid.). De hoc denuo ad Ephesios ita scribit: Ut Deus Domini nostri Jesu Christi, Pater gloriæ, det vobis spiritum sapientiæ et revelationis (Ephes. i, 17). Et ut ostenderet agnitio­ nem Dei in nobis revelationem Spiritus operari, cum dixisset: Det vobis Spiritum sapientiæ et revelationis, adjecit : In agnitione ejus.
「除了在人裡頭的靈,誰知道人的事?像這樣,除了神的靈,也沒有人知道神的事」(哥林多前書二章十一節)。論到聖靈,那同一位外邦人的教師說:「只有神藉著他的靈向我們啟示了」(哥林多前書二章十節)。關於此,他又如此寫信給以弗所人:「求我們主耶穌基督的神、榮耀的父,將那賜人智慧和啟示的靈賞給你們」(以弗所書一章十七節)。又為要顯明對神的認識在我們裡面成就聖靈的啟示,他在說了「將那賜人智慧和啟示的靈賞給你們」之後,加上一句:「使你們真知道他」。
'For what man knows the things of a man, except the spirit of a man that is in him? So also the things of God no one has known, but the Spirit of God' (1 Corinthians 2:11). Concerning him the same Doctor of the Gentiles says: 'For to us God has revealed them through his Spirit' (1 Corinthians 2:10). Concerning this he again writes thus to the Ephesians: 'That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you the spirit of wisdom and of revelation' (Ephesians 1:17). And to show that the knowledge of God works in us the revelation of the Spirit, when he had said: 'May he give you the Spirit of wisdom and revelation,' he added: 'in the knowledge of him.'
2:152
Sola vero se potest Trini­ tas revelare , quia sola se plene potest ipsa Trinitas nosse, et quantum se dederit agnoscendam , tantum se condonat revelandam ; ibi autem est plena sui co­ gnitio, ubi non est naturalis ulla discretio: a immen- sus namque ab immenso plene cognoscitur, et scien­ tiæ infinitas manet ubi substautia finem b non habet, nec scientiae terminus ab aliqua creatura contingitur, ubi quod immensum est nullatenus terminatur. CAPUT Xi. Deus advenit hominibus, non mobilitate, sed pietate. Sola est ergo una Trinitas, quæ cum se manifestat, ineffabiliter venit, et cum se indiguis occultat, ineffa­ biliter omnino discedit.
但唯獨三位一體能啟示自己,因為唯獨三位一體能完全認識自己;它把自己交出多少供人認識,就把自己賜下多少供人啟示;但那裡才有對自己完全的認識,即在沒有任何本性區分之處:因為無量者被無量者完全認識,並且哪裡本體沒有終點,哪裡知識的無限便存留;哪裡那無量者絕不受限,哪裡知識的界限便不被任何受造之物所觸及。第十一章:神臨到世人並非藉移動,乃是藉慈愛。因此唯有一位三位一體的神,當祂顯現自己時,便以不可言喻的方式前來;當祂向不配的人隱藏自己時,便以全然不可言喻的方式離去。
But the Trinity alone can reveal itself, because the Trinity alone can fully know itself, and as much as it gives itself to be known, so much it grants itself to be revealed; but there is full knowledge of itself where there is no natural distinction: for the immeasurable is fully known by the immeasurable, and the infinity of knowledge remains where the substance has no end, nor is the limit of knowledge attained by any creature, where that which is immeasurable is in no way bounded. CHAPTER XI. God comes to men not by mobility, but by mercy. There is therefore one sole Trinity, which, when it manifests itself, comes ineffably, and when it hides itself from the unworthy, departs altogether ineffably.
2:153
Veniunt atque abeunt pro­ prio et incomprehensibili modo Pater et Filius, et Spiritus sanctus: nec tamen localiter, aut Pater, aut Filius movetur, aut Spiritus. Noverunt sic venire atque abire, ut nec ad locum localiter veniant, nec localiter de loco discedant. Hic adventus Patris , et Filii, et Spiritus sancti, non mobilitatem, sed piela­ tero Dei venientis ostendit: una enim deitas e Trini­ tatis, quae omnia implet, omnia continet, illi venire dicitur, cui se manifestare dignatur;
聖父、聖子與聖靈以其自有而不可測度的方式前來與離去:然而聖父、聖子、聖靈都不是按處所移動的。他們知道如何前來與離去,以致既不按處所前來到某處,也不按處所離開某處。聖父、聖子、聖靈的這種前來,顯明的並非那前來之神的移動性,乃是祂的慈愛:因為三位一體那充滿萬有、包容萬有的獨一神性,被說成前來到祂所樂意向其顯現自己的人那裡;
The Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit come and go in their own and incomprehensible manner: yet neither the Father, nor the Son, nor the Spirit is moved locally. They know how to come and go in such a way that they neither come to a place locally, nor depart from a place locally. This coming of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit shows not the mobility, but the mercy of the God who comes: for the one deity of the Trinity, which fills all things and contains all things, is said to come to him to whom it deigns to manifest itself;
2:154
et ab illo disce­ dit, a quo lumen suae dilectionis abscondit, nec ta­ men localiter absens efficitur, cum juste relinquit in­ dignum, nec loco praesens efficitur, cum misericordi­ ter visitat quem fecerit dignum. Propterea, licet Deus dicat: Cælum et terram ego impleo (Jerem. XXIII, 24), tamen de quodam dicitur: Non eat Deus in conspectu ejus (Psal. ix, 5); et licet totum impleat Pater, dicitur tamen in libro Sapientiae : Perversæ enim cogitationes separant a Deo d (Sap. I, 3). Et cum de Filio, id est de sapientia Dei, dicatur : Attin. git a fine usque ad finem fortiter , et disponit omnia suaviter (Sap. VIII , i, eadem tamen de se dicit: Quærunt me mali, et non invenient.
並且祂從那向其隱藏其愛之光的人那裡離去,然而祂並不因此按處所而缺席,當祂公義地離棄不配的人時是這樣;祂也不因此按處所而臨在,當祂憐憫地眷顧祂所使之成為配得的人時是這樣。因此,神雖說:「我充滿天地」(耶利米書二十三章二十四節),論到某人卻說:「神不在他眼前」(詩篇十篇五節);聖父雖充滿全體,智慧篇中卻說:「因為乖僻的思念使人與神隔絕」(智慧篇一章三節)。論到聖子,即神的智慧,雖說:「她從這端到那端,大力運行,並溫柔地安排萬事」(智慧篇八章一節),那同一智慧卻論到自己說:「惡人尋找我,卻尋不見。」
and it departs from him from whom it hides the light of its love, yet it is not thereby made locally absent, when it justly abandons the unworthy, nor is it made locally present, when it mercifully visits him whom it has made worthy. Therefore, although God says: 'I fill heaven and earth' (Jeremiah 23:24), yet it is said concerning a certain one: 'God is not before his eyes' (Psalm 10:5); and although the Father fills the whole, yet it is said in the book of Wisdom: 'For perverse thoughts separate from God' (Wisdom 1:3). And although it is said concerning the Son, that is, concerning the wisdom of God: 'She reaches mightily from end to end, and orders all things sweetly' (Wisdom 8:1), yet the same wisdom says of herself: 'The wicked seek me, and shall not find me.'
2:155
Et rursus dicitur: In malevolam animam non introibit sapientia, nec in­ habitabit (al. inhabitat) in corpore subdito peccatis. Spiritus quoque sanctus, cum immensus omnimodis praedicetur, quia Spiritus Domini replevit orbem ter­ rarum, de eodem tamen dicitur : Sanctus enim Spiri­ tus effugiet fictum , et auferet se a cogitationibus quas sunt sine intellectu. Quantum ergo ad substantiam et 101 potentiam suam, ubique est Trinitas I unus Deus totus, totum complens virtute, non mole, to­ tus in singulis, totus simul in omnibus creaturis. Quantum vero ad cogitationes attinet nostras, de­ scendere ad nos Deus dicitur, cum sermonem suum ita nobis divinitus (al. divinitas) temperat, ut, hu.
又說:「智慧必不進入詭詐的心,也不住在被罪奴役的身子裡。」聖靈雖被稱為在各方面都無量的,因為「主的靈充滿寰宇」,論到聖靈卻又說:「因為聖靈必逃避詭詐,並必從無知的思念中退去。」因此,就其本體與能力而言,三位一體無所不在——一位全然的神,以德能而非以體積充滿全體,在各個之中是全然的,在一切受造之物之中同時是全然的。但就我們的思想而言,神被說成降到我們這裡,乃是當祂如此以神聖的方式將祂的話遷就我們,以致
And again it is said: 'Into a malevolent soul wisdom will not enter, nor dwell in a body subject to sins.' The Holy Spirit too, although he is proclaimed in every way immeasurable, since 'the Spirit of the Lord has filled the world of the earth,' yet it is said concerning the same: 'For the holy Spirit will flee deceit, and will withdraw himself from thoughts that are without understanding.' As therefore to his substance and power, the Trinity is everywhere—one God whole, filling the whole by virtue, not by mass, whole in each, whole at once in all creatures. But as regards our thoughts, God is said to descend to us, when he so tempers his word to us divinely that,
2:156
mano nobiscum more loquens, agnitionem et dilec­ tionem suam nobiS intimare dignetur ; ascendit au­ tem in nobis quando nos ascendimus per caritatem et scientiam deitatis, ut discamus , nec in immenso quidquam locale sapere, nec de altissimo humile ali­ quid æstimare, nec aliquid in Deo credere mutabile, nec in sempiterno temporale aliquid- cogitare. CAPUT XII. Requievit et operatus est Deus voluntate, non labore. Talis est Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti creden­ dus adventus; quoniam sicut mundana operatione primordialiter consummata, requievisse dicitur Deus, qui tamen non laboravit in operc , quia cuncta sola operatus est voluntate ; huic enim dicitur :
以人的方式與我們說話,祂便樂意將祂的認識與慈愛親密地傳達給我們;但當我們藉著愛與對神性的認識上升時,祂便在我們裡面上升,使我們得以學會:既不在那無量者中設想任何屬處所之事,也不對至高者估量任何卑微之事,既不相信神裡有任何可變的,也不在永恆中思想任何屬時間之事。第十二章:神憑意志而非憑勞苦而安息並工作。聖父、聖子、聖靈的前來當如此相信;因為正如當世界的工程在起初完成之時,神被說成已經安息——祂在工作中卻未曾勞苦,因為祂唯獨憑意志成就了萬事;因為經上對祂說:
speaking with us in a human manner, he deigns to make his knowledge and his love intimate to us; but he ascends in us when we ascend through charity and knowledge of the deity, so that we may learn neither to conceive anything local in the immeasurable, nor to esteem anything lowly of the most high, nor to believe anything changeable in God, nor to think anything temporal in the eternal. CHAPTER XII. God rested and worked by will, not by labor. Such is to be believed the coming of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit; for just as, the work of the world having been completed at the outset, God is said to have rested—who yet did not labor in the work, because he wrought all things by will alone; for to him it is said:
2:157
Subest enim tibi cum voles posse (Sap. XII, 18), sicut et in psalmo audimus : Omnia quæcunque voluit, fecit, in cælo, et in terra , et in mari, et in omnibus abyssis (Psal. CXXXIV, 6). Cujus voluntatis omnipotentiam evangelicus ille leprosus divina illuminatione cogno- secus. hanc ad suae mundationis sufficere testatur ef­ fectum dicens : Domine, si vis, potes me mundare ■ (Matth. VIII, 2); cum dicit, si vis, potes, ostendit di­ vinam voluntatem ipsam esse plenissimam potesta. tem. Denique etiam Dominus hoc misericorditer effectu curationis ostendit, quod erediderat fideliter qui poposcit; ait enim: Volo, mundare ; et confestim mundata eat lepra ejus.
「你何時願意,能力便隨時聽命」(智慧篇十二章十八節),正如我們在詩篇中也聽見:「耶和華在天上、在地下、在海中、在一切深處,都隨自己的意旨而行」(詩篇一三五篇六節)。福音書中那位大痲瘋病人蒙神聖光照而認識了這意志的全能,見證它足以成就他潔淨的果效,說:「主若肯,必能叫我潔淨了」(馬太福音八章二節);他說「你若肯,必能」,便顯明神聖的意志本身就是最完全的能力。最後,主也藉醫治的果效憐憫地顯明:那祈求的人乃是憑信而信的;因為他說:「我肯,你潔淨了吧」;他的大痲瘋立刻就潔淨了。
'For power is at hand to you when you will' (Wisdom 12:18), just as we also hear in the psalm: 'All things whatsoever he willed, he did, in heaven, and in earth, and in the sea, and in all the deeps' (Psalm 135:6). The omnipotence of this will that Gospel leper, enlightened by divine illumination, having recognized, testifies to suffice for the effect of his cleansing, saying: 'Lord, if you will, you can make me clean' (Matthew 8:2); when he says, 'if you will, you can,' he shows the divine will itself to be the fullest power. Finally, the Lord too mercifully showed by the effect of the cure that he who had asked had believed faithfully; for he says: 'I will, be made clean'; and immediately his leprosy was cleansed.
2:158
Sicut fidens ergo mundum, non cujusquam sensit laboris incommodum, ut vires labore operationis exhaustas, quietis posset instau­ rare successu ; sed cum se requievisse dicit, nos post bona opera requieturos ostendit : ita cum venisse, vel descendisse dicitur, divinæ revelationis erga nos gratia commendatur ; et cum non descendere, sed ascendere dicitur, profectus nostræ illuminationis agnitionisque monstratur. CAPUT XIII. De sensu dicti: Noli me tangere, etc. Dis­ solutio contrarietatis que videtur infer Evangelia. Talem Dominus Jesus ascensum significavit, quando tapgendi se facultatem Mariæ Magdalenæ prohibuit.
因此,正如祂滿有把握地潔淨那人,並未感到任何勞苦的不適,以致需要藉安歇的間隙來恢復因工作之勞而耗盡的體力;但當祂說祂安息了,祂便顯明我們在善工之後將要安息:照樣,當祂被說成前來或降下時,所彰顯的乃是神聖啟示向我們所施的恩典;當祂被說成不降下而是上升時,所顯明的乃是我們光照與認識的長進。第十三章:論「不要摸我」等語之意。福音書之間看似矛盾的化解。主耶穌所表明的正是這樣一種上升,即當祂禁止抹大拉的馬利亞觸摸祂之時。
As therefore, cleansing him with confidence, he felt no discomfort of any labor, such that he might restore by a spell of rest strengths exhausted by the labor of working; but when he says that he rested, he shows that we shall rest after good works: so when he is said to have come, or to have descended, the grace of divine revelation toward us is commended; and when he is said not to descend, but to ascend, the advance of our illumination and knowledge is shown. CHAPTER XIII. On the sense of the saying: 'Do not touch me,' etc. The resolution of the apparent contradiction between the Gospels. Such an ascent did the Lord Jesus signify, when he forbade to Mary Magdalene the possibility of touching him.
2:159
Post resurrectionem namque cum flenti misericordi­ ter appareret, Joannes eum dixisse commemorat : Noli me tangere, nondum enim ascendi ad Patrem meum (Joun. xx , 17). Hic tactus , de quo Dominus loquitur, credulitatis probatur esse , non corporis ; alioquin repugnans evangelistarum reperietur asser­ tio; nam cum Joannes tangendi Dominum Mariæ fa­ cultatem præreptam ipsius Domini testetur imperio, dicentis : Noli me tangere, nondum enim ascendi ad Patrem meum (Act.
因為復活之後,當祂憐憫地向那哭泣的婦人顯現時,約翰記載祂說:「不要摸我,因我還沒有升上去見我的父」(約翰福音二十章十七節)。主所說的這種觸摸,被證明乃是信念的觸摸,而非身體的觸摸;否則福音書作者的陳述便會顯得互相牴觸;因為約翰見證觸摸主的機會乃是憑主自己的命令從馬利亞那裡被奪去,主說:「不要摸我,因我還沒有升上去見我的父」,
For after the resurrection, when he mercifully appeared to her as she wept, John records that he said: 'Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to my Father' (John 20:17). This touch, of which the Lord speaks, is proved to be of belief, not of the body; otherwise the assertion of the evangelists would be found repugnant; for while John testifies that the possibility of touching the Lord was taken away from Mary by the command of the Lord himself, saying: 'Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to my Father,'
2:160
I, 3), et Dominum in cælum, secundum hominem, ascendisse quadragesimo resur­ rectionis die Seriptura confirmet (quod non solum Ecclesiæ sanctæ catholicae fides intemerata retinet, sed etiam variarum hæresum, earum duntaxat quæ 102 veræ carnis in Dei Filio non abnuunt sacramen­ tum, diversa multiformisquecredulitas, univoco prorsus concelebrat assensu), si priusquam Dominus ascendisset ad Patrem, noluit corporali accessu Ala­ riæ contingi, quomodo Matthæus ipso resurrectionis die, Mariam Magdalenam , et aliam Mariam, pedes Jesu memorat tenuisse ? Quod ut manifestius agno­ scatur, totum ejusdem loci capitulum, sicut Matthæus posuit, huic operi duximus inserendum. Ait igitur:
而聖經又確證主按其人性在復活後第四十日升入天上(這不但是神聖大公教會純潔無瑕的信仰所持守的,甚至各樣異端——至少是那些不否認神子有真肉身之奧祕的異端——那紛繁多樣的信念,也以全然一致的同意一同慶祝這事),那麼,若主在升到父那裡以先不願被馬利亞以身體的接近所觸摸,馬太又怎麼記載,就在復活當日,抹大拉的馬利亞和那另一個馬利亞抱住了耶穌的腳呢?為使這事更清楚地被認識,我們認為宜將馬太所記的那段經文整章插入本書。他這樣說:
and Scripture confirms that the Lord, according to his humanity, ascended into heaven on the fortieth day of the resurrection (which not only the undefiled faith of the holy catholic Church retains, but even the diverse and manifold belief of the various heresies—at least those which do not deny the sacrament of true flesh in the Son of God—celebrates together with entirely unanimous assent), if before the Lord had ascended to the Father he was unwilling to be touched by Mary's bodily approach, how does Matthew record that on the very day of the resurrection Mary Magdalene and the other Mary held the feet of Jesus? That this may be more clearly recognized, we have thought fit to insert into this work the whole chapter of that same passage, as Matthew set it down. He says therefore:
2:161
Vespere autem sabbati, quæ lucescit in prima sabbati, venit Maria Magdalene, et altera Maria, videre se­ pulcrum. Et ecce terræ motus factus est magnus. An­ gelus autem Domini descendit de cælo, et accedens re­ volvit lapidem, et sedebat super eum : erat autem aspectus ejus sicut fulgur, et vestimentum ejus sicut nix. Præ timore autem ejus exterriti sunt custodes, et facti sunt velut (al. sicut) mortui. Respondens autem angelus dixit mulieribus : Nolite timere vos : scio enim quod Jesum, qui crucifixus est, quæritis ; non est hic : surrexit enim, sicut dixit; venite, videte locum ubi po­ situs erat Dominus, Et eito euntes , dicite discipulis ejus quia surrexit;
「安息日將盡,七日的頭一日,天快亮的時候,抹大拉的馬利亞和那另一個馬利亞來看墳墓。忽然地大震動,因為有主的使者從天上下來,把石頭滾開,坐在上面。他的相貌如同閃電,衣服潔白如雪。看守的人就因他嚇得渾身亂顫,甚至和死人一樣。使者對婦女說:不要害怕,我知道你們是尋找那釘十字架的耶穌;他不在這裡,照他所說的,他已經復活了;你們來看安放主的地方。快去告訴他的門徒,說他已經從死裡復活了;」
'And in the end of the sabbath, when it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre. And behold there was a great earthquake. For an angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and coming, rolled back the stone, and sat upon it: and his countenance was as lightning, and his raiment as snow. And for fear of him the guards were struck with terror, and became as dead men. And the angel answering said to the women: Fear not you: for I know that you seek Jesus who was crucified; he is not here: for he is risen, as he said; come, see the place where the Lord was laid. And going quickly, tell his disciples that he is risen;'
2:162
et ecce præcedit (al, præcedet) vos in Galilæam : ibi eum videbitis. Ecce dixi vobis. Et exierunt cito de monumento cum timore et gaudio magno, currentes nuntiare discipulis ejus, Et ecce Je­ sus occurrit illis, dicens: Avete, Illæ autem acces- serunt et tenuerunt pedes ejus 9 et adoraverunt eum (Matth. XXVIII , 4-9). Quomodo ergo se, eo quod nondum ascendisset ad Patrem, a Maria Magdalene tangi vetuit, a qua sibi eodem die pedes teneri per­ misit ? An ita quisquam perverso sensu raptatur, ut momentaneis putet Chrisli sententias molibus varia- tas , tanquam qui postmoduin , melius recogitans, Mariæ tribuerit, quod antea denegarit ?
「看哪,他在你們以先往加利利去,在那裡你們要見他。看哪,我已經告訴你們了。婦女們就急忙離開墳墓,又害怕又大大地歡喜,跑去要報給他的門徒。忽然耶穌遇見她們,說:願你們平安。她們就上前抱住他的腳拜他」(馬太福音二十八章四至九節)。那麼,他既因還沒有升到父那裡而禁止抹大拉的馬利亞觸摸自己,怎麼卻在同一日容許這婦人抱住他的腳呢?難道有人被一種悖謬的心思所擄,以致認為基督的判斷會被一時的衝動所改變,彷彿他後來經過更好的思量,才把先前所拒絕的賜給馬利亞嗎?
'and behold he goes before you into Galilee: there you shall see him. Lo, I have told you. And they departed quickly from the tomb with fear and great joy, running to tell his disciples. And behold Jesus met them, saying: Hail. But they came up and held his feet, and adored him' (Matthew 28:4-9). How therefore did he, because he had not yet ascended to the Father, forbid himself to be touched by Mary Magdalene, by whom on the same day he permitted his feet to be held? Or is anyone so carried away by a perverse sense as to think that the judgments of Christ were varied by momentary impulses, as though he who afterward, on better reflection, granted to Mary what he had before denied?
2:163
Sed tali co­ gitationi protinus Vas eleetionis obsistit, qui in Dei Filio, secundum immutabilitatem divinitatis æteriuT, nuHa nos mutabilitatis suspicionc permittit errare, Corinthiis ita scribens: Dei enim Filius Jesus Christus qui in vobis per nos prædicatus est, per me, et Silva­ ttum, et Timotheum, non fuit a in illo est et non, sed est in illo fuit. Quotquot enim promissiones Dei sunt, in illo b sunt est : ideo, et per ipsum c dicimus : Amen Deo ad gloriam vestram (II Cor, I, 19. 20). Non ergo hic evangelistarum discrepat intellectus ; nec Christus aut inaniter se tangi, nondum ascendens ad Patrem, prohibuit, aut incassum sibi pedes teneri permisit.
但那蒙揀選的器皿立刻抵擋這種念頭,他論到神子裡永恆神性的不變性,不容我們因任何可變性的臆測而誤入歧途,他這樣寫信給哥林多人:「因為神的兒子耶穌基督,就是我與西拉並提摩太在你們中間所傳的,總沒有是而又非的,在他只有一是。神的應許,不論有多少,在他都是是的;所以藉著他也都是實在的,叫神因我們得榮耀」(哥林多後書一章十九至二十節)。因此,福音書作者的理解在此並不彼此矛盾;基督既非徒然地禁止人在他還沒升到父那裡時觸摸自己,也非毫無意義地容許人抱住他的腳。
But the Vessel of election straightway resists such a thought, who, concerning the immutability of the eternal divinity in the Son of God, does not permit us to err by any suspicion of mutability, writing thus to the Corinthians: 'For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was preached among you by us, by me and Silvanus and Timothy, was not in him "yes" and "no," but in him it was "yes." For all the promises of God are in him "yes"; therefore also through him we say "Amen" to God unto your glory' (2 Corinthians 1:19-20). Not here therefore does the understanding of the evangelists disagree; nor did Christ either vainly forbid himself to be touched, not having yet ascended to the Father, or permit his feet to be held to no purpose.
2:164
In uno enim demonstravit veritatem car­ nis, in altero insinuavit gioriam deitatis ; illic per­ misit manum, hic d amovit intellectum ; ut in homi­ ne Christo resuscitatae carnis tangeretur veritas, et in eodem Deo Christo paternæ divinilatis crederetur æqualitas. Ideo igitur dicit: Noli me tangere, quia nondum ascendi ad Patrem meum, quia Maria Mag­ dulene nondum Patri æqualem credebat, quem vclut exstinctum feminea pietate plangebat. Quid est enim: Noli me tangere, nondum enim ascendi ad Patrem meum, nisi, Noli hoc in me tantum credere quod pu­ tas , noN hoe in eorde firmare quod æstimas ? quia quandiu in me illa tantum quae sunt carnis attendis, æqualitatem meam cum Patre non sentis.
因為在其一,他彰顯了肉身的真理;在其二,他暗示了神性的榮耀;在那裡他容許了手,在這裡他挪去了誤解;為使在人性基督裡,復活肉身的真理得以被觸摸,而在同一位既是神的基督裡,父性神性的同等得以被相信。因此他說:「不要摸我,因我還沒有升上去見我的父」,因為抹大拉的馬利亞還不相信他與父同等,她卻以婦人的虔敬為他哀哭,如同他已消逝一般。因為「不要摸我,因我還沒有升上去見我的父」是甚麼意思呢?無非是:「不要只按你所想的相信我,不要在心裡確立你所臆測的」?因為只要你在我身上僅留意那些屬肉身之事,你便感受不到我與父的同等。
For in the one he demonstrated the truth of the flesh, in the other he intimated the glory of the deity; there he permitted the hand, here he removed the understanding; so that in the man Christ the truth of the resurrected flesh might be touched, and in the same Christ who is God the equality of the paternal divinity might be believed. Therefore he says: 'Do not touch me, because I have not yet ascended to my Father,' because Mary Magdalene did not yet believe him equal to the Father, whom she mourned with womanly devotion as though extinguished. For what is: 'Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to my Father,' but, 'Do not believe in me only that which you think, do not establish in your heart that which you suppose'? For as long as you attend in me only to those things which are of the flesh, you do not perceive my equality with the Father.
2:165
Et revera nondum illis Christus 103 ascendit ad Patrem, qui Patri Filium non confitentur æqualem. Festinandum itaque est, ut unusquisque perfectionem et veritatem humanæ naturæ in Dei Filio credens , tanquam pe­ des Christi teneat, ejusdemque Filii de Patre natam substantiam fateatur, ut illi Christus ad Patrem , per æqualitatem naturalis divinitatis, ascendat. Quid est enim : Nondum ascendi ad Patrem meum, nisi, infra Patrem existimas , quem mortuum ploras ? Et quid est: Noli me tangere, Nisi, noli in eo fidei tuæ mo­ tum statuere? Quotiescunque enim volumus quolibet membro aliquid tangere, nisi ejusdem membri finie­ rimus motum , non dicimus tactum :
實在的,對於那些不承認聖子與聖父同等的人,基督還沒有升到父那裡。因此必須趕緊,使各人相信人性在神子裡的完全與真實,如同抱住基督的腳,並承認這位聖子從父而生的本體,如此,基督便藉本性神性的同等,為他升到父那裡。因為「我還沒有升上去見我的父」是甚麼意思呢?無非是:「你把你所哀哭為死的那位看得低於父」?「不要摸我」又是甚麼意思呢?無非是:「不要把你信心的動作定於那裡」?因為每當我們想用任何肢體去觸摸某物時,除非我們已止住那肢體的動作,否則我們並不說那是觸摸;
And in truth Christ has not yet ascended to the Father for those who do not confess the Son equal to the Father. Therefore one must hasten, so that each one, believing the perfection and truth of human nature in the Son of God, may as it were hold the feet of Christ, and confess the substance of the same Son as born of the Father, so that to him Christ may ascend to the Father through the equality of natural divinity. For what is: 'I have not yet ascended to my Father,' but, 'you esteem below the Father him whom you bewail as dead'? And what is: 'Do not touch me,' but, 'do not fix the motion of your faith in that'? For whenever we wish to touch something with any member, unless we have ended the motion of that same member, we do not speak of a touch;
2:166
tandiu autem membrum illud necesse est moveamus, donec ad rem, quam volumus tangere, veniamus , c ulterius , autem motum membri non porrigimus, postquam ad tactum integrum venerimus. Sic et animi nostri m tum illic statuimus, quod in corde nostro credulitate firmamus. Proinde , si quæ digna et congrua sunt, credamus de Christo, tunc tangimus Christum. Quisquis autem Dei Filium, secundum divinam natu­ ram , aequalem Patri non credit, nondum illi ad Pa­ trem Christus ascendit; et cui Filius non ascendit ad Patrem, tangendi Christum non accipit facultatem :
但我們必須持續移動那肢體,直到我們來到我們所要觸摸之物;然而在我們達到完整的觸摸之後,我們便不再繼續伸展那肢體的動作。照樣,我們也把心思的動作定在我們心中憑信念所確立之處。因此,我們若對基督所信的是配得且合宜的,那時我們便觸摸了基督。但凡不相信神子按神聖本性與父同等的人,對他基督還沒有升到父那裡;那不曾有聖子升到父那裡的人,便得不著觸摸基督的機會;
but we must move that member for so long, until we come to the thing which we wish to touch; yet we do not extend the motion of the member any further, after we have come to a complete touch. So too we fix the motion of our mind there where we establish in our heart by belief. Therefore, if we believe things worthy and fitting concerning Christ, then we touch Christ. But whoever does not believe the Son of God, according to the divine nature, equal to the Father, to him Christ has not yet ascended to the Father; and he to whom the Son has not ascended to the Father does not receive the faculty of touching Christ;
2:167
illi autem vere Filius ascendit ad Patrem, qui Filium Patri æqualem, sempiternitatis et immensitatis pari­ litate non ambigit, ut Filium Deum, de Deo Patre naturaliter genitum, nec posteriorem æstimet, nec minorem : quia non aequalis, si minor immenso, nec coæternus, si posterior sempiterno ; uterque autem sensus a Christi tactu separat, quia non exaequat Pa­ tri Filium, sed minorat. Hujusmodi autem digne au­ dii a Christo : Noli me tangere, nondum enim ascendi ad Patrem meum. Quisquis enim tangere Christum non sinitur, ab ejus utique corpore separatur;
但對於那不懷疑聖子在永恆與無量上與聖父相等的人,聖子確實為他升到父那裡,如此他便看聖子——那從父神本性受生的神——既不在後,也不較小:因為他若小於那無量者,便不同等;他若後於那永恆者,便不同永;而這兩種看法都使人與基督的觸摸相隔絕,因為它不使聖子與父同等,反倒貶低了聖子。但這樣的人配得從基督聽見:「不要摸我,因我還沒有升上去見我的父。」因為凡不蒙准觸摸基督的人,必定與他的身體相隔絕;
but truly the Son ascends to the Father for that man who does not doubt the Son to be equal to the Father in the parity of eternity and immensity, so that he esteems the Son, God begotten naturally of God the Father, neither later nor lesser: because he is not equal, if he is less than the immeasurable, nor coeternal, if he is later than the eternal; and either sense separates from the touch of Christ, because it does not make the Son equal to the Father, but diminishes him. But one of this kind worthily hears from Christ: 'Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to my Father.' For whoever is not permitted to touch Christ is assuredly separated from his body;
2:168
quod est autem corpus Christi, nisi Ecclesia Christi Y Unde intelligitur quia, donec aliquis Filium Dei secundum divinam substantiam aequalem non credit Patri, mem­ bris Christi per tactum fidei non potest copulari; ille autem dominici corporis tenet profecto compa­ gem, cui Filius ascendit ad Patrem; illi autem Filius ascendit ad Patrem, qui deitatem Filii Deo Patri fate­ tur. aequalem. Manifeste itaque claret per illum ad Patrem ascensum Filii, nostræ potius profectum fidei demonstrari, nos enim eum quodammodo in nostris cordibus exaltamus, quando sic in ejus intel­ ligentia crescimus, ut de illo, tanquam de Deo vero, quae divinæ celsitudini (al. divina celsitudine) digna sunt cogitemus.
那麼基督的身體是甚麼,若非基督的教會呢?由此可知:只要有人不相信神的兒子按其神性本質與父同等,他就不能藉著信德的觸摸與基督的肢體相連;然而,凡使子上升到父那裡的人,確實持守著主身體的結構;而子上升到父那裡,乃是為那承認子的神性與父神同等的人。因此顯然可見:藉著子向父的那次上升,所彰顯的其實是我們信德的長進,因為當我們如此在對祂的認識上增長,以致我們論到祂,如同論到真神,思想那些配得神性崇高的事時,我們就在自己心中以某種方式高舉了祂。
But what is the body of Christ, if not the Church of Christ? From this it is understood that, so long as anyone does not believe the Son of God, according to His divine substance, to be equal to the Father, he cannot be joined to the members of Christ by the touch of faith; but he indeed holds the framework of the Lord's body, for whom the Son ascends to the Father; and to that man the Son ascends to the Father who confesses the Godhead of the Son to be equal to God the Father. Plainly, therefore, it is clear that by that ascent of the Son to the Father the advancement rather of our faith is demonstrated; for we in a certain way exalt Him in our hearts when we so grow in the understanding of Him that concerning Him, as concerning the true God, we think such things as are worthy of the divine loftiness.
2:169
CAPUT XIV. Quid sit Deum exaltare. Quid sit sanctificare. Ad hanc nos Dei exaltationem David sanctus hor­ tatur, dicens : Exaltate Dominum Deum nostrum, et adorate scabellum pedum ejus, quoniam sanctum est. (Psal. XCVIII, 5). Et paulo post : Exaltate Dominum Deum nostrum, et adorate in monte sancto ejus, quo­ niam sanctus Dominus Deus nosler (Ibid., 9). Quid est autem exaltare Dominum, nisi quæ altissima sunt, de altissimo credere ? Hoc est utique in monte adorare, iit cum de Deo cogitamus, nihil de illo humilesapiamus: sic in nobis vero 104 exaltatur, quando eum exalta­ mus, cum sit ipse semper altissimus;
第十四章 高舉神是甚麼;使神成聖是甚麼。聖大衛勸勉我們作這種對神的高舉,說:「你們要高舉耶和華我們的神,敬拜祂的腳凳,因為祂是聖的」(詩九十八5)。稍後又說:「你們要高舉耶和華我們的神,在祂的聖山上敬拜,因為耶和華我們的神是聖的」(同上9)。那麼高舉主是甚麼,若非相信至高者當有至高之事呢?這正是在山上敬拜,就是當我們思想神時,不對祂存任何卑下的念頭。如此,當我們高舉祂時,祂就在我們裡面真正被高舉,儘管祂自己永遠是至高者;
CHAPTER XIV. What it is to exalt God; what it is to sanctify Him. To this exaltation of God holy David exhorts us, saying: Exalt the Lord our God, and adore His footstool, for it is holy (Ps. 98:5). And a little after: Exalt the Lord our God, and adore on His holy mountain, for the Lord our God is holy (ibid., 9). But what is it to exalt the Lord, if not to believe the highest things concerning the Most High? This surely is to adore on the mountain, that when we think of God we should hold no lowly thing about Him. Thus in us He is truly exalted, when we exalt Him, though He Himself is always the Most High;
2:170
sicut in nobis san­ ctificatur, quando eum sanctificamus, cum semper ipse maneat sanctus. Nam beatus Petrus admonet nos, dicens: Dominum vero Christum sanctificate in cordi­ bus vestris (I Petr. III, 15) ; quid est autem Christum sanctificare, nisi de Christo quæ sancta sunt cogitare? Quæ cogitatio non illum, sed nos sanctincat, et san­ ctificando conservat, sicut Salomon dicit : Cogitatio sancta servabit te. Ipse quoque Dominus jubet ut in oratione dicamus : Sanctificetur nomen tuum; et ta­ men hunc orationis locum sic beatus intellexisse cognoscitur Cyprianus, ut in hac divini nominis san­ ctificatione, non Deum diceret sanctificari, sed nobis donum sanctificationis divinæconferri.
正如當我們使祂成聖時,祂在我們裡面被成聖,儘管祂自己永遠常存為聖。因為蒙福的彼得勸戒我們,說:「只要心裡尊主基督為聖」(彼前三15)。那麼尊基督為聖是甚麼,若非思想關乎基督那些為聖之事呢?這種思想所成聖的並非祂,乃是我們,並藉著成聖保守我們,正如所羅門所說:「聖潔的思念必保守你」。主自己也吩咐我們在禱告中說:「願人都尊祢的名為聖」;然而蒙福的居普良被公認如此理解禱文中的這一句,即在這尊神聖名為聖的事上,他所說的並非神被成聖,乃是成聖的恩賜被賜給我們。
just as in us He is sanctified, when we sanctify Him, though He Himself always remains holy. For blessed Peter admonishes us, saying: But sanctify the Lord Christ in your hearts (1 Pet. 3:15). And what is it to sanctify Christ, if not to think concerning Christ the things that are holy? This thought sanctifies not Him, but us, and by sanctifying preserves us, as Solomon says: A holy thought will keep you. The Lord Himself also commands that in prayer we say: Hallowed be Thy name; and yet blessed Cyprian is known to have so understood this passage of the prayer, that in this sanctification of the divine name he said not that God is sanctified, but that the gift of sanctification is conferred upon us.
2:171
In epistola namque de dominica oratione, quibusdam præmissis, ita loquitur: Post hoc (al. posthæc)dicimus : Sancti- ficetur nomen tuum, non quod optemus Deo ut sancti­ ficetur orationibus nostris, sed quod petimus ab eo ut nomen ejus sanctificetur in nobis. a Cæterum a quo Deus sanctificatur, qui ipse sanctificat ? sed quia ipse dixit: Sancti estote, quia et ego sanctus sum (Levit. XI, 44), id petimus, et rogamus, ut qui in baptiamo sanctificati sumus, in eo quod esse cæpimus, perseveremus, et hoc quotidie deprecamur. Opus est enim nobis quotidiana sanctificatione, ut qui quotidie delinquimus, delicta nostra sanctificatione assidua b repurgemua. Si (al.
因為在他論主禱文的書信中,先陳述了一些話後,他這樣說:「在此之後,我們說:願祢的名被尊為聖;並非我們願神藉我們的禱告被成聖,乃是我們求祂,願祂的名在我們裡面被尊為聖。再者,神自己成聖萬有,誰能使祂成聖呢?但因祂自己說過:『你們要聖潔,因為我是聖潔的』(利十一44),所以我們如此祈求並禱告,願我們這些在洗禮中已被成聖的人,在我們所開始成為的樣式上恆久堅守;這是我們每日的懇求。因為我們需要每日的成聖,好使我們這些每日犯過的人,藉不斷的成聖重新滌淨我們的過犯。」
For in his epistle on the Lord's Prayer, after certain things premised, he speaks thus: After this we say: Hallowed be Thy name, not that we wish for God that He be sanctified by our prayers, but that we ask of Him that His name be sanctified in us. For besides, by whom is God sanctified, who Himself sanctifies? But because He Himself said: Be holy, for I also am holy (Lev. 11:44), we ask and pray this, that we who have been sanctified in baptism may persevere in that which we have begun to be; and this we entreat daily. For we have need of daily sanctification, that we who daily transgress may cleanse our offenses anew by continual sanctification.
2:172
si­ cut) ergo sanctificantes Christum, nos sanctificamur, et nomen Dei sanctificari poscentes, nos donum sancii­ ficationis accipimus, cur exaltantes Deum, non potius nos per intelligentiæ profectum exaltari c credamus? Quod si Deum exaltantes, nos potius exaltamur (at. I exaltamns), similiter cum nobis venire dicitur, no­ strum profectum debemus credere, in eo quod se di­ vina majestas nostris dignatur cordibus revelare. CAPUT XV. Quomodo a Christo virtus exiit, muliere fimbriam ejus tangente. Quomodo Christus nobis ve. ntre dicitur, aut in propria. Spiritus sanctus quoque immensus est. Tota Trinitas immensa. Nam si Filius Dei ad nos locali motu descendit, localiter de illo virtus exi vit :
所以,若在尊基督為聖時,我們自己被成聖;在祈求神的名被尊為聖時,我們領受成聖的恩賜;那麼,在高舉神時,我們豈不更該相信是我們自己藉著悟性的長進而被高舉嗎?但若在高舉神時,被高舉的其實是我們,同樣地,當說祂來到我們這裡時,我們就當相信這是我們自己的長進,即神聖的威嚴俯就向我們的心顯明自己。第十五章 那婦人摸耶穌衣裳繸子時,能力如何從基督發出。基督如何被說是來到我們這裡,或來到自己的地方。聖靈也是無限的。整個三位一體都是無限的。因為,倘若神的兒子藉著位移下到我們這裡,那麼能力就是從祂那裡按位置發出的:
If therefore, in sanctifying Christ, we ourselves are sanctified, and in asking that the name of God be sanctified, we receive the gift of sanctification, why should we not rather believe that, in exalting God, we ourselves are exalted through the advancement of understanding? But if, in exalting God, it is rather we who are exalted, likewise when He is said to come to us, we ought to believe it to be our own advancement, in that the divine majesty deigns to reveal itself to our hearts. CHAPTER XV. How virtue went forth from Christ when the woman touched the hem of His garment. How Christ is said to come to us, or to come unto His own. The Holy Spirit also is immense. The whole Trinity is immense. For if the Son of God descended to us by local motion, then virtue went forth from Him locally:
2:173
cum enim quaedam mulier, in proOuvio sanguinis constituta (Luc. VIII, 45 et seq.), facultatibus viribusque consumptis, om­ nia quæ habuit propter infirmitatem finiret, et solam infirmitatem, quam habere nollet, finire non posset, d atque a cœlesti medico gratis curari desiderans, occulte fimbriam tangens, fideli raptu sanitatis sibi furaretur effectum, ille credulitatis conscius et salutis, ait: Tetigit me aliquis: nam ego novi virtutem de me exisse. Quid igitur hæc virtus quæ de Domino exivit? nunquid exeundo discessit? an ad sanandam sic exiens potuit pervenire, ut a Salvatore localiter non posset exire?
因為當一個患血漏的婦人(路八43及下文),資財與體力都已耗盡,因她的疾病花光了所有一切,卻無法止住那她唯一不願有的病,並渴望被那位屬天的醫者白白醫治,暗暗摸了衣裳的繸子,藉著信心的「竊取」為自己偷得了痊癒的功效——祂知道她的信與她的痊癒,就說:「有人摸我;因我覺得有能力從我身上出去。」那麼這從主身上出去的能力是甚麼呢?它出去時,難道就離開了嗎?抑或它這樣出去施行醫治而能達到目的,卻不能按位置從救主那裡出去嗎?
for when a certain woman, afflicted with an issue of blood (Luke 8:43 ff.), her means and strength consumed, spent all that she had because of her infirmity, and yet could not put an end to the one infirmity which she did not wish to have, and, desiring to be freely healed by the heavenly Physician, secretly touching the hem, by a faithful theft stole for herself the effect of healing—He, conscious of her belief and of her cure, said: Someone touched Me; for I know that virtue has gone forth from Me. What then is this virtue that went forth from the Lord? Did it, in going forth, depart? Or could it, thus going forth to heal, arrive, in such a way that it could not go forth locally from the Savior?
2:174
Quod si localiter ab eo, qui virtus di­ citur, virtus exivit, dicatur qualiter virtus a virtute discessit ? Si vero talis credulitas fidei Christianæ videtur incongrua, non alium putemus illum de Christo virtutis exitum, 105 nisi divinæ curationis offectum : tune enim ad mulierem virtus Salvatoris exivit, quando in se virtutem divinae curationis agno. vit. Sic ergo Dei Filius, qui est virtus et sapientia I Dei, locorum creator et temporum, quemadmodum tempus omne sempiternus praecedit, sic omnem locum immensus excedit; qui nobis tunc venire dicitur, cum nos illuminare dignatur. De ipso namque dicit evangelista : In mundo erat, et mundus per ipsum (al.
但若能力是按位置從那位被稱為「能力」的祂那裡出去的,那就請說明,能力如何從「能力」離去呢?然而,若這樣的信念看似與基督信仰不合,那我們就當認定:能力從基督發出,無非就是神聖醫治的功效發生:因為當那婦人在自己身上認出神聖醫治之能時,救主的能力便向她發出了。因此,神的兒子——祂就是神的能力與智慧,是地方與時間的創造者——正如祂是永恆的,先於一切時間,照樣祂是無限的,超越一切地方;當祂俯就光照我們時,就被說是來到我們這裡。因為福音書作者論到祂說:「祂在世界,世界也是藉著祂造的,
But if virtue went forth locally from Him who is called Virtue, let it be said in what way virtue departed from Virtue. But if such a belief seems incongruous with the Christian faith, let us suppose that going-forth of virtue from Christ to be nothing other than the effect of divine healing: for then the Savior's virtue went forth to the woman, when she knew in herself the virtue of divine healing. So then the Son of God, who is the Virtue and Wisdom of God, the Creator of places and of times, just as, being eternal, He precedes all time, so, being immense, He surpasses every place; who is then said to come to us, when He deigns to enlighten us. For concerning Him the evangelist says: He was in the world, and the world was made through Him,
2:175
eum) factus est, et mundus eum non cognovit : in propria venit, et sui eum non receperunt. Quomodo igilur et in mundo fuisse dicitur, et in mundum ve- ' nisse firmatur? an illud est potentiæ, istud gratiæ depulandum? Ila plane : secundum divinitatem nam. que suam nec cœlo unquam defuit, nec inferno, nec mundo : Omnia enim per ipsum et in ipso creata sunt, et ipse est ante omnes, et omnia in ipso constant (Coloss.. I, 16, 17); secundum gratiam vero tunc in mundum venit, quando pereunti mundo mira pietate subvenit, quod etiam ipse testatur, dicens : Non enim misit Deus Filium suum ut judicet mundum, ud ut salvetur mundus per ipsum (Joan. III, 17).
世界卻不認識祂。祂到自己的地方來,自己的人倒不接待祂。」那麼祂怎能既被說是曾在世界,又被確認為曾來到世界呢?前者豈不該歸於權能,後者歸於恩典?正是如此,明明白白:因為按祂的神性,祂從未離開過天,也未離開過陰間或世界——因為萬有都是藉著祂並在祂裡面被造的,祂在萬有之先,萬有也靠祂而立(西一16-17);但按恩典,祂則是在以奇妙慈愛拯救那將亡之世界時,才來到世界,這也是祂自己所見證的,說:「因為神差祂的兒子降世,不是要審判世界,乃是要叫世界因祂得救」(約三17)。
and the world knew Him not: He came unto His own, and His own received Him not. How then is He said both to have been in the world, and affirmed to have come into the world? Is the former to be assigned to power, the latter to grace? Just so, plainly: for according to His divinity He was never absent from heaven, nor from hell, nor from the world—for all things were created through Him and in Him, and He is before all, and all things consist in Him (Col. 1:16-17); but according to grace He then came into the world, when with wondrous mercy He came to the aid of the perishing world, which He Himself also attests, saying: For God sent not His Son to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him (John 3:17).
2:176
Est igi­ tur immensus Dei Filius, sicut Pater et Spiritus, quoniam de ipso dictum est : Magnus est, et non ha­ bet finem, excelsus et immensus (Baruch III, 25); de quo paulo post dicitur : Post hæc in terris visus est, et cum hominibus conversatus est (Ibid., 38). Immen­ sus est etiam Spiritus sanctus : quod sciens prophe­ ta, dicebat ad Deum : Quo ibo a Spiritu tuo, et a facie tua quo fugiam (Psal. CXXIVIII, 7)? Quem Spiritum Dei, ut ipsum sanctum Spiritum propheta memora- tus ostenderet, dicit Deo : Ne projicias me a facie tua, et Spiritum sanctum tuum ne auferas a me (Psal. L, 13). Quem Spiritum Dei ipsum esse Spiritum san­ ctum Apostolus quoque hac attestatione significat :
所以,神的兒子是無限的,正如父與靈一樣,因為論到祂曾說:「祂為大,無窮無盡,至高而無限」(巴錄書三25);稍後又論到祂說:「此後祂在地上被人看見,與人同住」(同上38)。聖靈也是無限的:先知知道這事,就對神說:「我往哪裡去躲避祢的靈?我往哪裡逃躲避祢的面?」(詩一三八7)。而為要顯明神的這靈就是聖靈自己,這位先知對神說:「不要從祢面前丟棄我,不要從我收回祢的聖靈」(詩五十一11)。使徒也藉這見證表明,神的這靈就是聖靈自己:
The Son of God, therefore, is immense, like the Father and the Spirit, since concerning Him it is said: He is great, and has no end, exalted and immense (Baruch 3:25); of whom a little after it is said: After this He was seen upon earth, and conversed with men (ibid., 38). The Holy Spirit also is immense: which the prophet, knowing, said to God: Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit, and whither shall I flee from Thy face? (Ps. 138:7). And that the said prophet might show this Spirit of God to be the Holy Spirit Himself, he says to God: Cast me not away from Thy face, and take not Thy Holy Spirit from me (Ps. 50:13). And that this Spirit of God is the Holy Spirit Himself the Apostle also signifies by this testimony:
2:177
Nolite contristare Spiritum sanctum Dei, in quo si­ gnati estis in a die redemptionis (Ephes. IV, 30). Et alio loco : Qui autem hæc spernit, non hominem sper­ nit, sed Deum, qui etiam dedit Spiritum sanctum suum in nobis (I Theas. IV, 8). Hunc Spiritum Dei sanctum sic immensum David pronuntiat, ut Deo (sicut su­ perius memoravimus) dicat : Quo ibo a Spiritu tuo, et a facie tua quo fugiam? Si ascendero in cœlum, tu illic es; et si descendero ini infernum, ades; et b si assumpsero pennas meas in directione, sive (sicut alia translatio habet) ante lucem, et habitavero in novis- .imo maris : etenim illuc manus tua deducet me, et continebit me dextera tua.
「不要叫神的聖靈擔憂,你們原是受了祂的印記,等候得贖的日子來到」(弗四30)。又在另一處說:「那棄絕這道理的,不是棄絕人,乃是棄絕神;神也把祂的聖靈賜給我們」(帖前四8)。大衛宣告神的這聖靈是如此無限,以致他對神說(如我們上面所提):「我往哪裡去躲避祢的靈?我往哪裡逃躲避祢的面?我若升到天上,祢在那裡;我若下到陰間,祢也在那裡;我若展開翅膀一直向前,或(如另一譯本所作)向著黎明之前,飛到海極居住,就是在那裡,祢的手必引導我,祢的右手也必扶持我。」
Grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, in whom you were sealed unto the day of redemption (Eph. 4:30). And in another place: He who despises these things despises not man, but God, who also gave His Holy Spirit into us (1 Thess. 4:8). This Holy Spirit of God David proclaims to be so immense, that he says to God (as we mentioned above): Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit, and whither shall I flee from Thy face? If I ascend into heaven, Thou art there; and if I descend into hell, Thou art present; and if I take my wings straight forward, or (as another translation has it) before the dawn, and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea: even there shall Thy hand lead me, and Thy right hand shall hold me.
2:178
Manum Patris Filium nul- Ius ambigit nominari, de quo ipse Deus dicit: Nonne manus mea fecit hæc omnia? c Attamen propheta, ut Trinitatem requaliter praedicaret immensam, et Pa­ trem significavit, cui dixit: Quo ibo a Spiritu tuo ? et ipsum Spiritum, a quo se ire vel fugere nullo modo posse testatur; et Filium demonstravit, ubi se a Dei manu etiam in novissimo maris prædicat deducen­ dum : ut agnoscatur Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti una esse immensitas, et una præsentia in omnibus creaturis. Hæc est Trinitas unus Deus, qui sicut po­ tuit solus universa condere, sic potest omnia solus Implere, nec localis in loco, nec temporalis in tem­ pore, nec terminabilis termino creaturæ. CAPUT XVI.
無人懷疑「父的手」是指子而言,論到這子,神自己說:「這一切豈不是我手所造的嗎?」然而,先知為要宣告三位一體同樣是無限的,就既指明了父——他對父說:「我往哪裡去躲避祢的靈?」——又指明了那靈自己,他見證自己絕不能離開或逃避那靈;他也指明了子,即他宣告自己就是在海極也要被神的手引導:如此,好使人認識父、子、聖靈只有一個無限,並在萬有受造之物中只有一個同在。這就是三位一體,獨一的神,祂既能獨自創立宇宙,也能獨自充滿萬有,既不因地方而受限,也不因時間而受制,更不被受造之物的界限所限定。第十六章。
No one doubts that the hand of the Father names the Son, concerning whom God Himself says: Did not My hand make all these things? Yet the prophet, that he might proclaim the Trinity equally immense, both signified the Father, to whom he said: Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit? and the Spirit Himself, from whom he attests he can in no way go or flee; and he demonstrated the Son, where he proclaims that he is to be led by the hand of God even in the uttermost parts of the sea: so that there might be acknowledged one immensity of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and one presence in all creatures. This is the Trinity, one God, who, as He alone could found the universe, so He alone can fill all things, neither local in place, nor temporal in time, nor limitable by the limit of a creature. CHAPTER XVI.
2:179
Deus est tibique, imo et in secreto preces audit. 106 Nam Immensitatem divinitatis Filii Dei ma. nifesta prædicatione, et eloquiorum divinorum attes­ tatione, beatus martyr Cyprianus affirmat in cpislola de Oratione Dominica, dicens : « Denique magisterio suo Dominus secreto nos orare præcepit, in abditis et secretis loci., in cubiculis ipsis, quod magis convenit fidei; ut sciamus Deum ubique esse præsentem, audire omnes et videre, et majestatis, suæ plenitudine in ab­ dita quoque et occulta penetrare, sicut scriptum est: Ego Deus approximans, et non Deus de longinquo. Si absconditus fuerit homo in absconditis, ego crgo non videbo eum? nonne coelum et terram ego impleo (Jer. XXIII, 23, 24) ?
神與你同在,不但如此,祂連在隱密處也垂聽禱告。因為蒙福的殉道者居普良,在他論主禱文的書信中,藉著明白的宣告和神聖言語的見證,肯定神兒子神性的無限,說:「總而言之,主藉祂自己的教訓吩咐我們要在隱密處禱告,在幽隱私密之所,就在我們自己的內室,這更合乎信德;好叫我們知道神無處不在,垂聽並看見一切,並以祂威嚴的豐盛穿透到隱藏隱密之處,正如經上所記:『我是近處的神,不是遠處的神。人若藏在隱密處,我豈看不見他呢?我豈不充滿天地嗎?』(耶二十三23-24)」
God is with you, nay, He hears prayers even in secret. For blessed martyr Cyprian affirms the immensity of the divinity of the Son of God by manifest proclamation and by the attestation of the divine oracles, in his epistle on the Lord's Prayer, saying: Finally, by His own teaching the Lord commanded us to pray in secret, in hidden and secret places, in our very chambers, which better befits faith; that we may know that God is everywhere present, that He hears and sees all, and that by the fullness of His majesty He penetrates even into hidden and secret things, as it is written: I am a God at hand, and not a God afar off. If a man be hidden in secret places, shall I then not see him? Do I not fill heaven and earth? (Jer. 23:23-24).
2:180
Et iterum: In omni loco oculi Dei speculantur bonos et malos (Prov. xv, 3). Et quando in unum cum fratribus convenimus, et sacrifi­ da divina cum Dei sacerdote celebramus, verecundiæ et disciplinæ memores esse debemus : non passim veu­ tilare preces nostras inconditis vocibus, nec petitionem commendandam modeste Deo tumultuosa loquacitate jactare, quia Deus non vocis, sed cordis auditor est, nec admonendus est clamoribus, qui cogitationes videt, probante Domino et dicente: Quid cogitatis nequam incordibus vestris (Matth. ix, 4)? Et alio loco : Scient omnes Ecclesiae quia ego sum scrutator d renis et cordis (Apoc. II, 13).. » Beatus certe Cyprianus Deum.
又說:「耶和華的眼目無處不在,鑒察惡人善人」(箴十五3)。當我們與弟兄們聚集在一起,同神的祭司舉行神聖祭獻時,我們當記念虔敬與規矩:不可用雜亂的聲音四處拋灑我們的禱告,也不可用喧嘩多言把那本當謙卑呈於神的祈求張揚出來,因為神所垂聽的不是聲音,乃是內心;祂鑒察人的思念,不需以喊叫提醒,正如主所認可並說的:「你們心裡為甚麼懷著惡念呢?」(太九4)又在另一處說:「眾教會必知道,我是察看人肺腑心腸的」(啟二23)。蒙福的居普良確實[稱]神——
And again: In every place the eyes of God behold the good and the evil (Prov. 15:3). And when we come together in one with the brethren, and celebrate the divine sacrifices with God's priest, we ought to be mindful of reverence and of discipline: not to scatter our prayers everywhere with disordered voices, nor to cast forth in tumultuous loquacity the petition that ought to be modestly commended to God, because God is a hearer not of the voice but of the heart, nor is He to be admonished with shouts, who sees our thoughts, as the Lord approves and says: Why do you think evil in your hearts? (Matt. 9:4). And in another place: All the churches shall know that I am the searcher of the reins and the heart (Rev. 2:23). Blessed Cyprian, assuredly, [calls] God
2:181
quem dixit ubique esse praesentem, audire omnes et videre, et majestatis suae plenitudine e in abdita quo­ que et occulta penetrare, ipsum quoque non vocis, sed cordis asserit auditorem, nec admonendum cla­ moribus, qui cogitationes videt; ipsum quoque ponit dicentem : Quid cogitatis nequam in cordibus vestris ? Et alio loco : Scient omnes Ecclesiæ quia ego sum scru­ tator renis et cordis. Hæc autem quis nesciat a Filio Dei dicta, sicut Apocalypsis Evangeliumque testatur? Filius igitur (sicut sanctus asserit Cyprianus) ubique praesens est, idem omnes audit et videt, et majesta­ tis suæ plenitudine in abdita quoque et occulia pe­ netrat, nec clamoribus admonendus est qui cogita­ tiones videt.
——就是他所說那位無處不在、垂聽並看見一切、並以祂威嚴的豐盛穿透到隱藏隱密之處的神——他也肯定祂是垂聽內心而非聲音者,並肯定這位鑒察人思念的神不需以喊叫提醒;他也把祂列為說這話的那位:「你們心裡為甚麼懷著惡念呢?」又在另一處:「眾教會必知道,我是察看人肺腑心腸的。」然而,正如啟示錄與福音書所見證的,誰不知道這些話是神的兒子所說的呢?所以子(如聖居普良所肯定的)是無處不在的;同一位垂聽並看見一切,並以祂威嚴的豐盛穿透到隱藏隱密之處,這位鑒察人思念的祂,不需以喊叫提醒。
—whom he said to be everywhere present, to hear all and see all, and by the fullness of His majesty to penetrate even into hidden and secret things—him he also asserts to be a hearer not of the voice but of the heart, nor to be admonished by shouts, who sees our thoughts; him also he sets forth as saying: Why do you think evil in your hearts? And in another place: All the churches shall know that I am the searcher of the reins and the heart. But who does not know that these things were said by the Son of God, as the Apocalypse and the Gospel testify? The Son, therefore (as holy Cyprian asserts), is everywhere present; the same One hears all and sees all, and by the fullness of His majesty penetrates even into hidden and secret things, nor is He, who sees our thoughts, to be admonished by shouts.
2:182
Huic sensui Joannis evangelistae dicta concordant, qui dicit de quibusdam : Quia Jesus non credebat semetipsum illis, eo quod ipse nosset omnes. et quia opus ei non erat, ut quis testimonium perhibe, ret de homine, ipse enim sciebat quid esset in homine (loan. II, 24). CAPUT XVII. Christus, nunquam suos derelinquit solos, quia ei: ubique adest. Deo omnia manifesta. " Simile quiddam beatus Cyprianus etiam ad Tyba­ ritanos scribens de Filii Dei immensitale, testatur his verbis: Solus non est, cui Christus in fuga comes est;
約翰福音作者的話與此意相合,他論到某些人說:「耶穌卻不將自己交託他們,因為祂自己知道萬人,也用不著誰見證人怎樣,因祂自己知道人心裡所存的」(約二24-25)。第十七章 基督從不撇下祂的人獨自一人,因祂無處不在。萬事在神面前都是顯明的。蒙福的居普良在寫給提巴里斯人的書信中,論到神兒子的無限,也用這些話見證了類似的事:「凡有基督在逃亡中作伴的人,並不孤單;
With this sense agree the sayings of John the evangelist, who says concerning certain men: That Jesus did not commit Himself unto them, because He Himself knew all men, and because He had no need that anyone should give testimony concerning man; for He Himself knew what was in man (John 2:24). CHAPTER XVII. Christ never leaves His own alone, because He is present everywhere. All things are manifest to God. Blessed Cyprian, writing also to the Thibaritans concerning the immensity of the Son of God, attests something similar in these words: He is not alone, whose companion Christ is in flight;
2:183
solus non est, qui templum Dei servans, ubicun­ que fuerit, sine Domino non est, et si fugientem in solitudine ac montibus latro oppresserit, fera invaserit, fames aut sitis, aut frigus afflixerit, vel per maria præ. cipiti navigatione properantem, tempestas aut procella submerserit, spectat militem suum Christus ubicunque. pugnantem. 107 In epistola quoque de Lapsis, quis­ quis volet, haec inserta reperiet: Videt ille corda et pectora singulorum et judicaturus non tantum de fa­ ctis, sed et verbis et cogitationibus nostris, omnium mentes voluntatesque conceptas intra ipsas adhuc clausi pectoris latebras intuetur.
凡守著神的殿的人,無論身在何處,都不是沒有主的;即使他在曠野和山間逃亡時被強盜制伏、被野獸襲擊、被饑渴或寒冷所困,或當他匆忙冒險渡海航行時被暴風狂浪吞沒——基督無論在哪裡都看顧祂爭戰的士兵。」在《論墮落者》的書信中,凡願意的人也必發現這些話被插入其中:「祂看見各人的心與胸懷,並且祂將要審判的,不僅是我們的行為,也是我們的言語和思念;祂洞察眾人的心思意念,就是那仍藏在尚未開啟之胸懷隱密深處所懷的意念。」
he is not alone who, keeping the temple of God, wherever he may be, is not without the Lord; and if a robber should overpower him fleeing in the wilderness and the mountains, or a wild beast attack him, or hunger or thirst or cold afflict him, or, as he hastens by headlong voyage over the seas, a tempest or storm should overwhelm him—Christ everywhere beholds His soldier fighting. In the epistle On the Lapsed, too, whoever wishes will find these words inserted: He sees the hearts and breasts of every one, and, about to judge not only our deeds but also our words and thoughts, He beholds the minds and wills of all, conceived within the very hidden recesses of the still-closed breast.
2:184
Filius ergo Dei, tam aucto­ ritate divina quam sanctorum Patrum fideli veraci­ que sententia, secundum divinam naturam infinitus immensusque probatur, ubique præsens, omnia re­ plens, testis nunc cogitationum et operum, futurus judex retributorque cunctorum. Quia vero idem Fi­ lius Dei, verus Deus, natus de Deo Patre, verus ho- mo factus est pro nobis ex homine (factus est enim ex semine Daiid secundum carnem [Rom. I, 3]), divinae humanaeque natu a: in se continens veritatem, quae fuerunt veræ divinitatis non amisit, et quæ sunt veræ humanitatis accepit : unus idemque secundum carnem de matre temporaliter natus, qui secundum divinitatem de Patre permanet sempiternus ;
所以,無論按神聖的權威,還是按眾聖教父忠信而真實的判斷,都證明神的兒子按其神性乃是無限而無量的,無處不在,充滿萬有,如今作思念與作為的見證者,將來作萬人的審判者與報應者。但因這同一位神的兒子,真神,從父神所生,為我們從人而成為真人(因為祂按肉體是從大衛的後裔生的〔羅一3〕),在自己裡面兼具神性與人性二者的真實,祂未失去屬於真神性者,並領受了屬於真人性者:同一位,按肉體從母親在時間中出生的祂,就是那按神性從父永遠常存的祂;
The Son of God, therefore, both by divine authority and by the faithful and truthful judgment of the holy Fathers, is proved, according to His divine nature, to be infinite and immense, everywhere present, filling all things, now a witness of thoughts and works, and the future judge and recompenser of all. But since the same Son of God, true God, born of God the Father, was made true man for us out of man (for He was made of the seed of David according to the flesh [Rom. 1:3]), containing in Himself the truth of both the divine and the human nature, He did not lose what belonged to true divinity, and received what belongs to true humanity: one and the same, according to the flesh temporally born of a mother, who according to the divinity remains eternal from the Father;
2:185
unus idemque homo localis ex homine, qui est Deus im­ mensus ex Patre ; unus idemque secundum huma­ nam substantiam, absens coelo cum esset in terra, et derelinquens terram cum ascendisset. in coelum ; secundum divinam vero immensamque substantiam, nec cœlum dimittens cum de coelo descendit, nec terram deserens cum ad coelum ascendit Quod ipsius Domini certissimo potest cognosci sermone , qui ut localem ostenderet humanitatem suam, dicit discipulis suis : Ascende ad Patrem meum et ad Patrem vestrum, Deum meum et Deum vestrum (Joan. xx, 17). De La­ zaro quoque cum dixisset: Lazarus mortuus est, ad­ junxit dicens: Et gaudeo propter vos, ut credatis quoni am non eram ibi (Joan. XI, 14, 15).
同一位,是從人而來、有位置的人,也是從父而來、無限的神;同一位,按其人性本質,當祂在地上時就不在天上,當祂升天後就離開了地;但按其神性、無限的本質,當祂從天降下時並未離開天,當祂升天時也未撇下地。這可從主自己最確鑿的話語得知,祂為要顯明祂有位置的人性,對門徒說:「我要升上去見我的父,也是你們的父,見我的神,也是你們的神」(約二十17)。論到拉撒路時,當祂說了「拉撒路死了」以後,又補充說:「我為你們歡喜,因為我不在那裡,好叫你們相信」(約十一14-15)。
one and the same, a local man out of man, who is the immense God out of the Father; one and the same, according to His human substance absent from heaven while He was on earth, and forsaking earth when He had ascended into heaven; but according to His divine and immense substance, neither leaving heaven when He descended from heaven, nor deserting earth when He ascended to heaven. This can be known from the most certain saying of the Lord Himself, who, to show His local humanity, says to His disciples: I ascend to My Father and your Father, My God and your God (John 20:17). Concerning Lazarus too, when He had said: Lazarus is dead, He added, saying: And I am glad for your sakes, that you may believe, because I was not there (John 11:14-15).
2:186
Immensita­ tem vero suæ divinitatis ostendens discipulis dicit : Ecce ego vobiscum sum omnibus diebus, usque ad con­ summationem sæculi (Matth. XXVIII, 20). Quomodo autem ascendit in coelum, nisi quia localis et verus est homo ? Aut quomodo adest fidelibus suis, nisi quia idem immensus et verus est Deus ? De ipso rursum dicit Scriptura : Quia vere habitatU Deus cum hominibus iri terra. (II Parat. VI, 18), de quo evange­ lista dicit: Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis. Quod Verbum, ut agnosceretur, etiam cum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis, nunquam di­ scessisse de caelo, propterea David dicit: In æternum, Domine, permanet Verbum tuum in cœlo (Psal. cavit, 93).
但為顯明祂神性的無限,祂對門徒說:「看哪,我天天與你們同在,直到這世代的終結」(太二十八20)。然而,祂若非有位置的真人,怎能升天呢?祂若非同一位無限的真神,又怎能與祂的信徒同在呢?聖經又論到祂說:「神真住在人間,在地上」(代下六18);福音書作者論到祂說:「道成了肉身,住在我們中間。」而為使人認識這道,即使在祂成了肉身住在我們中間時,也從未離開過天,大衛因此說:「耶和華啊,祢的話安定在天,直到永遠」(詩一一九89)。
But showing the immensity of His divinity, He says to His disciples: Behold, I am with you all the days, even to the consummation of the age (Matt. 28:20). But how did He ascend into heaven, unless because He is a local and true man? Or how is He present to His faithful ones, unless because the same is the immense and true God? Concerning Him the Scripture again says: For God truly dwells with men upon earth (2 Chron. 6:18); of whom the evangelist says: The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us. And that this Word, even when it was made flesh and dwelt among us, might be recognized never to have departed from heaven, David for this reason says: Forever, O Lord, Thy Word remains in heaven (Ps. 118:89).
2:187
De ipso uno eodemque Dei sempiterno Filio, et futuro tUnC hominis Filio, in quo permansisset vera et immensa divinitas, et a quo suscipienda esset vera localisque humanitas, propheticæ inspirationis agni­ tione repletus, dixerat Jeremias : Hic Deus noster, et non æstimabitur alius ad eum. Adinvenit omnem viam disciplinæ, et dedit eam Jacob puero suo et Israel di­ lecto suo. Post hæc in terris visus est, et cum hominibus conversatu eat (Baruch III, 36, 37, 38). Et quoniam de ipso superius dixerat:
論到這同一位神的永恆之子,就是那將要成為人子的那一位——真實而無限的神性要存留在祂裡面,真實而有位置的人性要藉祂被承受——耶利米滿有先知默示的認識,曾說:「這是我們的神,除祂以外,別無可算為神的。祂尋得一切智慧的道路,賜給祂的僕人雅各,和祂所愛的以色列。此後祂在地上被人看見,與人同住」(巴錄書三36-38)。且因他在前面論到祂曾說:
Concerning this one and the same eternal Son of God, and the One who would then be the Son of man—in whom the true and immense divinity would have remained, and by whom the true and local humanity was to be assumed—Jeremiah, filled with the recognition of prophetic inspiration, had said: This is our God, and no other shall be accounted beside Him. He found out every way of discipline, and gave it to Jacob His servant and to Israel His beloved. After this He was seen upon earth, and conversed with men (Baruch 3:36-38). And since he had said of Him above:
← 上一段下一段 →
← 第 1 章第 3 章 →
12345678910111213141516

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。