📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 文集

特土良

文集 第 16 章 第 2/2 段

拉丁文原文.21 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 16:40–16:60(全章共 60 節)

← 第 15 章第 17 章 →
← 上一段
16:40
'Dominus est, potens est; omnia illius sunt; ubi fuero, in manu illius sum; faciat quod vult, non discedo, et si perire me volet, ipse me perdat, dum me ego illi servo. Malo invidiam ei facere per voluntatem ipsius pereundo quam bilem per meam evadendo'. XI. Haec sentire et facere omnem servum dei oportet, etiam minoris loci, ut maioris fieri possit, si quem gradum in persecutionis tolerantia ascenderit. Sed cum ipsi auctores, id est ipsi diaconi et presbyteri et episcopi fugiunt, quomodo laicus intelligere poterit, qua ratione dictum: Fugite de civitate in civitatem ? Itaque cum duces fugiunt, quis de gregario numero sustinebit ad gradum in acie f i gendum suadere?
「祂是主,祂大有能力;萬有都屬於祂;無論我在何處,我都在祂手中;願祂隨意而行,我決不離去;若祂願我滅亡,就讓祂親自毀滅我,只要我為祂持守自己。我寧願照祂的旨意滅亡而使人埋怨祂,也不願照我自己的意思逃脫而觸怒祂。」天主的每一個僕人都當如此存心、如此行事,即使是地位較低的,好使他能升為較高的——只要他在忍受迫害上邁進了任何一步。但當那些領袖——就是執事、司鐸、主教本人——都逃跑時,平信徒怎能明白「從這城逃到那城」這話是何等意思呢?所以,當將領逃跑時,兵卒中誰還肯聽人勸他在陣線上堅守崗位呢?
'The Lord it is; He is mighty; all things are His; wherever I shall be, I am in His hand; let Him do what He wills, I depart not; and if He shall will me to perish, let Him Himself destroy me, so long as I keep myself for Him. I would rather bring odium upon Him by perishing according to His will, than provoke His anger by escaping according to mine.' Thus ought every servant of God to feel and to act, even one of lower rank, that he may become of higher, if he shall have ascended any step in the endurance of persecution. But when the very leaders — that is, the deacons and presbyters and bishops themselves — flee, how shall the layman be able to understand in what sense it was said: 'Flee from city to city'? And so, when the commanders flee, who of the rank and file will bear to be urged to hold his ground in the battle-line?
16:41
Certe quidem bonus pastor animam pro pecoribus ponit, ut Moyses non domino adhuc Christo revelato et iam in se figurato ait: Si perdis hunc populum, inquit, et me pariter cum eo disperde. Ceteram Christo confirmante figuras suas malus pastor est, qui viso lupo fugit et pecora diripienda derelinquit; proicietur de villa pastor huiusmodi, detinebuntur illi mercedes missionis suae in compensatione, immo et de priore peculio eius exigetur detrimenti dominici restitutio: Etenim qui habet, dabitur ei, ab eo autem, qui non habet, etiam quod videtur habere, auferetur. Sic Zacharias comminatur: Exurge, rhomphaea, in pastores et evellite oves et superducam manum meam in pastores.
誠然,好牧人為羊捨命,正如梅瑟——當基督主尚未顯明、卻已在他身上被預表之時——所說:「祢若毀滅這百姓,」他說,「求祢連我也一同毀滅。」但如今基督既印證了祂自己的預表,那見了狼就逃跑、撇下羊任其被撕裂的,便是惡牧人;這樣的牧人必被逐出羊圈,他雇工的工價必被扣留以作抵償——不但如此,甚至還要從他先前的私財中索取賠償,以償還主所受的虧損:「因為凡有的,還要賜給他;凡沒有的,連他所似乎有的,也要奪去。」匝加利亞也如此恫嚇:「刀劍哪,起來攻擊牧人;你們要奪出羊來;我必伸手攻擊牧人。」
Certainly indeed the good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep, as Moses — when Christ the Lord had not yet been revealed, but was already prefigured in himself — says: 'If Thou destroyest this people,' he says, 'destroy me also together with it.' But now that Christ confirms His own figures, he is a bad shepherd who, seeing the wolf, flees and abandons the sheep to be torn in pieces; such a shepherd shall be cast out of the fold, the wages of his hire shall be withheld from him in compensation — nay, even from his former private store the restitution of the Lord's loss shall be exacted: 'For to him who has, it shall be given; but from him who has not, even what he seems to have shall be taken away.' So Zechariah threatens: 'Arise, O sword, against the shepherds, and pluck out the sheep; and I will bring My hand upon the shepherds.'
16:42
In quos et Ezechiel et Hieremias isdem minis perorant, quod non tantum de pecoribus improbe vescantur pascentes potius semetipsos, verum et dispersam gregem faciant et in praedam esse omnibus bestiis agri, dum non est pastor illis. Quod numquam magis fit, quam cum in persecutione ecclesia destituitur a clero. Si et Spiritum quis agnoverit, audiet fugitivos denotantem. Porro si eos, qui gregi praesunt, fugere, cum lupi irruunt, nec decet, immo nec licet ---- qui enim talem pastorem malum pronuntiavit, utique damnavit; omne autem quod damnatur, illicitum factum est sine dubio ----, ideo praepositos ecclesiae in persecutione fugere non oportebit.
厄則克耳與耶肋米亞也以同樣的恫嚇痛斥這些人,因為牧人不但可恥地吞吃羊群、反倒牧養自己,且使羊群四散,任其成為田野一切野獸的獵物,因為牠們無人牧放。而這事最常發生的時候,莫過於教會在迫害中被聖職人員所離棄之時。人若也承認聖神,就必聽見祂斥責逃亡者。再者,若那些治理羊群的人在狼衝進來時逃跑,既不合宜——不,甚至是不合法的——因為那宣判這樣的牧人為惡的,必已定他的罪;而凡被定罪的,無疑已成為不合法之事——那麼,教會的領袖在迫害中逃跑,便是不許可的。
Against these Ezekiel and Jeremiah too inveigh with the same threats, because the shepherds not only feed shamefully upon the flock, pasturing themselves rather, but also cause the flock to be scattered and to become a prey to all the beasts of the field, while there is no shepherd for them. And this never happens more than when, in persecution, the church is deserted by the clergy. If anyone will also acknowledge the Spirit, he will hear Him branding fugitives. Further, if it neither becomes those who preside over the flock to flee when the wolves rush in — nay, is not even lawful — for he who has pronounced such a shepherd to be bad has assuredly condemned him, and everything that is condemned has without doubt been made unlawful — therefore it will not be lawful for the presidents of the church to flee in persecution.
16:43
Ceterum si grex fugere deberet, non debere t praepositos gregis stare, sine causa staturos ad tutelam gregis, quam grex non desiderat, scilicet ex licentia fugae. XII. Quod pertineat, frater, ad tuum problema, habes sententiae nostrae responsionem et exhortationem. Porro si quis quaerit, an persecutio fugienda sit, sequentem quoque quaestionem iam prospiciat necesse est, an, si fugienda non est, redimenda certe sit. Ultro igitur et de hoc tibi suggeram, definiens persecutionem, quam constat non esse fugiendam, proinde nec redimendam. Pretium interest; ceterum sicut fuga redemptio gratuita est, ita redemptio nummaria fuga est. Certe et huius timiditatis consilium est.
但若羊群當逃避,羊群的領袖就不當站立,因為他們既為保護羊群而站立,而羊群——既得逃避之自由——並不需要那保護,他們的站立便毫無緣由。弟兄,關乎你的問題,你已在我們意見的答覆及其勸勉中得著了。再者,若有人問迫害是否當逃避,他就必然要一併預先看那接下來的問題:迫害若不當逃避,是否至少當用錢贖回。因此,我要主動就這一點也向你提出我的看法,斷定:一場公認不當逃避的迫害,同樣不當贖回。價錢固然有別;但正如逃避是無償的贖免,錢財的贖回也就是一種逃避。這無疑同樣是怯懦的計謀。
But if the flock ought to flee, the presidents of the flock ought not to stand, since they would be standing without cause for the protection of a flock which — being at liberty to flee — does not desire it. That which pertains, brother, to thy problem, thou hast in the answer of our opinion and its exhortation. Further, if anyone asks whether persecution is to be fled, he must of necessity look ahead also to the following question: whether, if it is not to be fled, it is at least to be bought off. Of my own accord, therefore, I will suggest something to thee on this point also, defining that a persecution which it is agreed is not to be fled is likewise not to be bought off. There is a difference of price; but just as flight is a gratuitous redemption, so a monetary redemption is a flight. Certainly this too is the counsel of timidity.
16:44
Quod times, redimis, ergo fugis; pedibus stetisti, nummis curristi; hoc ipsum, quod ex redemptione stetisti, fugisti. Ut autem redimas hominem tu nummis, quem ex sanguine suo redemit Christus, quam indignum deo et dispositionis eius, qui filio suo non pepercit pro te, ut fieret pro nobis maledictum ---- quia maledictus, qui pependerit in ligno ----, qui tamquam ovis ad victimam ductus est, et tamquam agnus ante tondentem sic non aperuit os, sed posuit dorsum suum in flagella, maxillas autem in palmas et faciem non avertit a sputaminibus et inter iniquos deputatus est et traditus est in mortem, mortem autem crucis: totum hoc, ut nos a peccatis lucraretur. Sol cessit die[m] emptionis nostrae:
你所懼怕的,你就贖買;因此你就是逃避;你用腳站立,卻用錢奔逃;你既藉贖回而站立,這事本身就意味著你已逃避。然而你竟用錢財去贖一個基督已用自己寶血贖回的人——這對天主、對祂的措置何等不配!祂為了你連自己的兒子也未曾顧惜,好叫祂為我們成了咒詛——因為「凡懸在木頭上的,都是被咒詛的」——祂如羊被牽去宰殺,又像羔羊在剪毛的人面前一樣默然不開口,反倒把背脊交給鞭子,把兩頰交給手掌,並未轉臉躲避唾沫,且被列在罪犯之中,被交付於死,且是十字架的死:這一切,都是為了把我們從罪中贖出。在我們得贖的那日,太陽也隱退了:
What thou fearest, thou buyest off; therefore thou fleest; thou hast stood with thy feet, but run with thy money; the very fact that thou hast stood by redemption means that thou hast fled. But that thou shouldst redeem with money a man whom Christ has redeemed with His own blood — how unworthy of God and of His dispensation, who spared not His own Son for thee, that He might be made a curse for us — since 'cursed is he who has hung upon the wood' — who as a sheep was led to the slaughter, and as a lamb before the shearer so opened not His mouth, but gave His back to the scourges, His cheeks too to the palms, and turned not His face from the spittle, and was reckoned among the wicked, and was delivered up to death, even the death of the cross: all this, that He might gain us from our sins. The sun withdrew on the day of our purchase:
16:45
apud inferos remancipatio nostra est et stipulatio nostra in caelis; sublevatae sunt portae sempiternae, ut introiret rex gloriae, dominus virtutum, hominem de terris, immo ab inferis mercatus in caelos. Quis est nunc, qui adversus illum reluetatur, immo depretiat mercedem eius tam magno comparatam, pretiosissimo scilicet sanguine agni immaculati ? Iam ergo melius fugere quam fieri viliorem, si non tanto sibi constabit homo, quanti constitit domino. Et dominus quidem illum redemit ab angelis munditenentibus potestatibus, a spiritalibus nequitiae, a tenebris huius aevi, a iudicio aeterno, a morte perpetua;
我們的贖回在陰府之中,我們的立約在諸天之上;永恆的門戶被高舉,好讓榮耀的君王進入,就是萬軍的主,祂已把人從地上——不,從陰府——買到諸天之上。如今誰還敢與祂相抗——不,誰還敢貶低祂用如此高價、就是用無玷羔羊至寶貴的血所買來的贖價呢?那麼,若一個人在自己眼中不值他在主眼中所值的那樣高,倒不如逃避,強過使自己貶值。主確實把他從那把持世界的天使、從諸權勢、從邪惡的諸靈、從今世的黑暗、從永遠的審判、從永恆的死亡中贖了出來;
in the lower regions is our repurchase, and in the heavens is our covenant; the everlasting gates were lifted up, that the King of glory might enter in, the Lord of hosts, having purchased man from the earth — nay, from the lower regions — into the heavens. Who is he now who struggles against Him — nay, who cheapens His purchase, bought at so great a price, that is, with the most precious blood of the immaculate Lamb? Now, then, it is better to flee than to become of less worth, if a man shall not stand at so high a value to himself as he stood to the Lord. And the Lord indeed redeemed him from the angels that hold the world, from the powers, from the spirits of wickedness, from the darkness of this age, from eternal judgment, from perpetual death;
16:46
tu autem pro eo pacisceris cum delatore vel milite vel furunculo aliquo praeside sub tunica et sinum, quod aiunt, ut furtivo, quem coram toto mundo Christus emit, immo et manumisit. Hunc ergo liberam pretio aestimabis et pretio possidebis nisi eodem, quanto, ut diximus, domino constitit, sanguine suo scilicet? Ut quid ergo de homine Christum redimis in homine, in quo Christus est? Non aliter et Simon facere temptavit, cum pecuniam apostolis obtulit pro spiritu Christi. Audiet ergo et iste, qui se redimens Christi spiritum redemit: Pecunia tua tecum sit in interitum, quoniam gratiam dei pretio consequendam putasti. Quis talem non ut abnegatorem spernat? Quid enim dicit ille concussor?
但你竟為祂之故,與一個告密者、或一個兵丁、或某個小賊般的總督,如人所說在衣衫底下、在懷中討價還價,彷彿為著贓物一般——去贖一個基督已在全世界眼前買下、甚至已釋放為自由人的人!那麼,你豈要按價估量這個獲釋者、按價擁有他麼?除非是照那同樣的價錢,就是如我們所說主為他所付出的那樣高——即祂自己的血。那麼,你在人身上、藉著人、贖那在人內的基督,究竟為了甚麼呢?西滿當年向使徒獻錢以求基督之神時,所圖的也不過如此。所以這人也必聽見——就是那贖回自己、因而贖回了基督之神的人:「你的銀子和你一同滅亡罷,因為你以為天主的恩典可用價錢獲得。」誰不把這樣的人當作背棄信仰的人而唾棄呢?那勒索者究竟說甚麼?
but thou, on His behalf, strikest a bargain with an informer or a soldier or some petty thief of a governor, under thy tunic and in thy bosom, as they say, as though for stolen goods, one whom Christ bought in the sight of the whole world — nay, even manumitted. Wilt thou then value this freedman at a price, and possess him at a price, unless at that same price, so great as, we have said, he cost the Lord — namely, His own blood? To what end, then, dost thou redeem Christ in man, by man, in whom Christ is? Simon too attempted to do nothing else, when he offered money to the apostles for the Spirit of Christ. So he too shall hear — he who, in redeeming himself, has redeemed the Spirit of Christ: 'Thy money be with thee unto perdition, since thou hast thought the grace of God to be obtained at a price.' Who would not spurn such a one as a denier? For what does that extortioner say?
16:47
'Da mihi pecuniam.' Certe ne eum tradat, siquidem non aliud venditat, quam quod praestaturus est praemio tuo. Cum das, utique ne tradaris voluisti; non traditus autem traduci habebas? Ergo dum nolendo tradi non vis traduci, nolendo negasti te esse, quod traduci noluisti. 'Immo', inquis, 'dum nolo traduci quod sum, confessus id esse, quod nolo traduci, id est Christianum'. Potes itaque te martyrem vindicare, si constanter ostendis[se] Christum; redimens non ostendit. Apud unum si forte confessus es, ergo et apud plures nolendo confiteri negasti. Ipsa salus iudicabit hominem excidisse, dum evadit; excidit ergo, qui maluit evasisse. Negatio est etiam martyrii recusatio.
「把錢給我。」當然,是為了叫他不把你交出去;既然他所賣的無非是他本要作為你賞報而提供的東西。你付錢的時候,無非是不願被交出去;但你若不被交出去,難道還會被告發麼?所以,你既因不願被交出而不願被告發,就藉這「不願」而否認了自己是那你所不願被告發的身分。「不然,」你說,「我不願為我的真實身分被告發,卻已承認自己就是那我所不願被告發的身分——就是基督徒。」那麼,你若堅定地顯明了基督,倒可自稱為殉道者;但你既贖了身,就沒有顯明祂。你縱然或許在一個人面前承認了,卻因不願在許多人面前承認,就是否認了。得救本身必判定:人一逃脫,就已墮落;那寧願逃脫的人,就是墮落了。拒絕殉道也就是否認。
'Give me money.' Certainly, that he may not hand thee over; since he sells nothing else than what he was going to provide as thy reward. When thou givest, thou surely didst wish not to be handed over; but if not handed over, wast thou to be denounced? Therefore, while by being unwilling to be handed over thou art unwilling to be denounced, by being unwilling thou hast denied thyself to be that which thou wast unwilling to have denounced. 'Nay,' thou sayest, 'while I am unwilling to be denounced for what I am, I have confessed myself to be that for which I am unwilling to be denounced — that is, a Christian.' Thou canst therefore claim thyself a martyr, if thou hast steadfastly shown Christ; but in redeeming, thou hast not shown Him. If perhaps thou hast confessed before one, yet before many, by being unwilling to confess, thou hast denied. Salvation itself shall judge that a man has fallen away, while he escapes; he has fallen away, then, who chose rather to have escaped. A refusal of martyrdom is also a denial.
16:48
Christianus pecunia salvus est et in hoc nummos habet, ne patiatur, dum adversus deum erit dives? At enim Christus sanguine fuit dives pro illo. Felices itaque pauperes, quia illorum, inquit, est regnum caelorum, qui animam solam in confiscato habent. Si non possumus deo servire et mammonae, possumus et a deo redimi et a mammona? Quis enim magis serviet mammonae, quam quem mammonas redemit? Postremo quo exemplo uteris in redemptionem traditionis? Apostoli tractantes persecutionibus agitati quando se pecunia liberaverunt, quae illis utique non deerat ex praediorum pretiis ad pedes eorum depositis?
基督徒難道靠錢得救、為此存錢——好叫自己免受苦——同時卻要在天主面前作富足人麼?然而基督為他曾以血成為富足。所以貧窮的人是有福的,祂說,因為天國是他們的——就是那把自己的性命當作唯一被充公之財產的人。我們若不能事奉天主又事奉錢財,難道能同時被天主和錢財所贖麼?因為除了那被錢財所贖的人,還有誰更事奉錢財呢?末了,你用甚麼榜樣來為贖免出賣辯護呢?使徒在他們的行事中,飽受迫害的追逼,幾時曾用錢救過自己呢——那錢財,從擺在他們腳前的田產價銀而論,他們必定是不缺的?
Is a Christian saved by money, and does he keep coins for this — that he may not suffer — while he shall be rich against God? But Christ was rich in blood for him. Blessed therefore are the poor, for theirs, He says, is the kingdom of heaven — those who have their soul alone in their confiscated possession. If we cannot serve God and mammon, can we be redeemed both by God and by mammon? For who will serve mammon more than he whom mammon has redeemed? Lastly, what example dost thou use for the redemption of betrayal? When did the apostles, in their dealings, harried by persecutions, ever free themselves by money — which was assuredly not lacking to them from the prices of estates laid at their feet?
16:49
Certe multis locupletibus credentibus, viris ac feminis, qui his etiam refrigeria subministrabant, quando Onesiphorus aut Aquila aut Stephanas hoc modo eis in persecutionem succurrerunt? Paulus quidem, cum Felix praeses pecunias accepturum se pro eo a discipulis sperasset, de quo et ipse in secreto tractavit cum ipso, neque ipse pro se neque discipuli pro eo numeraverunt, illi utique discipuli, qui flentes, quod [n]aeque Hierosolymam tendere perseveraret et persecutiones praedicatas illic non praecaveret, postremo inquiunt: Fiat voluntas dei. Quae ista voluntas? utique ut pateretur pro nomine domini, non ut redimeretur.
誠然,當許多富有的男女信了、甚至供給這些人飲食之時,一個敖乃息佛洛、或阿桂拉、或斯特法納,幾時曾以這樣的方式在迫害中救助他們呢?誠然,當總督斐理斯指望從門徒手中為保祿收取錢財——這事他自己也曾私下與保祿商議——保祿既不曾為自己付甚麼,門徒也不曾為他付甚麼;正是那些門徒,因保祿執意前往耶路撒冷、不防備那裡預言的迫害而哭泣,末了卻說:「願天主的旨意成就。」那旨意是甚麼呢?必定是要他為主的名受苦,而非被贖回。
Certainly, when many wealthy men and women believed, who even ministered refreshments to these, when did an Onesiphorus or an Aquila or a Stephanas thus come to their aid in persecution in this manner? Paul indeed, when Felix the governor had hoped that he would receive money for him from the disciples — a matter of which he himself also treated with him in secret — neither did Paul himself pay anything for himself, nor the disciples for him; those disciples, assuredly, who, weeping because he persisted in pressing on to Jerusalem and did not guard against the persecutions foretold there, at last said: 'The will of God be done.' What was that will? Assuredly, that he should suffer for the name of the Lord, not that he should be ransomed.
16:50
Oportet enim, quomodo Christus animam suam posuit pro nobis, ita fieri pro eo et a nobis nec tantum pro ipso, immo etiam pro fratribus propter ipsum. Quod et Iohannes docens non [et] pro fratribus numerandum, sed moriendum potius pronuntiavit. Nihil interest, si quem Christianum redimere non debeas alium an te. Et adeo voluntas dei sic est: aspice regnorum et imperiorum utique a deo dispositum statum, in cuius manu cor regis:
因為理當如此:正如基督為我們捨了性命,我們也當為祂如此行——且不僅為祂,甚至為弟兄、也為祂的緣故而行。若望教導這事時,也宣告:為弟兄不該只是斤斤計較,而寧該為他們捨命。無論是另一個基督徒、還是你自己不該去贖,都無分別。而天主的旨意確是如此:看那列國萬邦的局面,必定是天主所安排的,君王的心也在祂手中:
For it behooves us that, just as Christ laid down His soul for us, so it should be done for Him also by us — and not only for Him, but even for the brethren on His account. And John too, teaching this, pronounced that it is not to be reckoned up for the brethren, but rather that we must die for them. It makes no difference whether it is another Christian or thyself whom thou oughtest not to redeem. And indeed the will of God is thus: behold the state of kingdoms and empires, disposed assuredly by God, in whose hand is the heart of the king:
16:51
tanta cotidie aerario augendo prospiciuntur remedia censuum, vectigalium, collationum, stipendiorum nec umquam tamen usque adhuc ex Christianis tale aliquid prospectum est sub aliqua redemptione capitis et sectae redigendis, cum tantae multitudinis nemini ignotae fructus ingens meti posset; sanguine empti, sanguine numerati nullum nummum pro capite debemus, quia caput nostrum Christus est: non decet Christum pecunia constare. Quomodo et martyria fieri possent in gloriam domini, si tributo licentiam sectae compensaremus? Itaque qui eam praemio paciscitur, dispositioni divinae adversatur.
為充實國庫,每日藉評稅、賦稅、捐輸、稅役而設下如許多的措施;然而直到如今,卻從未有人設想過藉贖人、削減教派而向基督徒課取這類東西,儘管從那眾所皆知、如此龐大的人群中,本可收取巨額的稅收。我們既是用血買來、用血點算的,就不欠一分錢為我們的性命,因為我們的元首是基督:用錢購取基督,是不相宜的。再者,我們若用貢賦換取教派的許可,殉道又怎能為主的榮耀而成就呢?所以,凡用賄賂為它討價還價的人,就是與天主的措置為敵。
so many remedies for augmenting the treasury are daily provided by way of assessments, taxes, contributions, and levies; and yet never up to now has any such thing been contemplated in respect of Christians, by way of some ransom of the person and the reducing of the sect, although from so great a multitude, unknown to no one, an immense revenue might be reaped. Bought with blood, counted out with blood, we owe not a single coin for our person, because our Head is Christ: it does not befit Christ to be procured with money. How, too, could martyrdoms come to pass unto the glory of the Lord, if by tribute we should purchase license for the sect? And so, whoever bargains for it with a bribe sets himself against the divine dispensation.
16:52
Cum igitur nihil nobis Caesar indixerit in hunc modum stipendiariae sectae, sed nec indictum umquam tale quid possit, antichristo iam instante et in sanguinem, non in pecunias hiante Christianorum, quomodo mihi proponere potest scripturam esse: Reddite quae sunt Caesaris Caesari ? Miles me vel delator vel inimicus concutit, nihil Caesari exigens, immo contra fas faciens, cum Christianum legibus humanis reum mercede dimittit. Alius denarius, quem Caesari debeo, qui ad eum pertinet, de quo tunc agebatur, tributarius, tributariis scilicet, non a liberis debitus. Aut quomodo reddam, quae sunt dei, deo, utique proinde imaginem et monetam ipsius inscriptam nomine eius, id est hominem Christianum?
既然凱撒未曾以這種納貢教派的方式向我們加課甚麼——也不可能有這類的加課,如今反基督既已逼近、渴求的是基督徒的血而非錢財——那麼怎能向我援引聖經所說:「凱撒的,就應歸還凱撒」呢?一個兵丁、或告密者、或仇敵向我勒索,卻並不為凱撒索取甚麼——不,他倒行了不義之事,竟為賄賂而釋放一個按人律當受罪的基督徒。我欠凱撒的,乃是另一種銀錢,是屬於他的,就是那當時所議論的貢銀,本是納貢者所欠、而非自由人所欠的。再者,我又怎能把天主的歸還天主呢——當然是指那按祂的名蓋印的、祂的肖像與錢幣,就是基督徒這個人?
Since, then, Caesar has laid nothing upon us in the way of such a tributary sect — nor could any such thing ever be laid, now that Antichrist presses on and gapes for the blood, not the money, of Christians — how can it be alleged to me that Scripture says: 'Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's'? A soldier or an informer or an enemy shakes me down, demanding nothing for Caesar — nay, acting rather against right, when he dismisses for a bribe a Christian who is guilty under human laws. It is another denarius which I owe to Caesar, one that pertains to him, that tribute-money concerning which the matter was then in question, owed indeed by tributaries, not by the free. Or how shall I render to God the things that are God's — namely, His image and coin, stamped with His name, that is, the Christian man?
16:53
Quid autem deo debeo sicut denarium Caesari nisi sanguinem, quem pro me filius fudit ipsius? Quodsi deo quidem hominem et sanguinem meum debeo, nunc vero in eo sum tempore, ut quod deo debeo expostuler, utique fraudem deo facio id agens, ne quod debeo solvam. Bene observavi praeceptum Caesari reddens, quae sunt Caesaris, deo vero, quae sunt dei, abnegans! XIII. 'Sed et omni petenti me dabo': in causa elimosinae, non in concussurae. Petenti inquit; porro qui incutit, non petit; qui comminatur, si non acceperit, non postulat, sed extorquet; non elimosinam expectat, qui non miserandus, sed timendus venit.
但我欠天主的,如同欠凱撒的那一枚銀錢,除了祂親子為我所流的血,還有甚麼呢?既然我確實既欠天主我的人性、也欠天主我的血,而我如今正處於那被討要我所欠天主之物的時候,那麼我若行事使自己不繳所欠的,就必定是對天主行詐了。我倒真是「善於」遵守誡命:把凱撒的歸還凱撒,卻把天主的向天主賴掉了!「然而,」他說,「凡求我的,我就給他」:這是就施捨而言,不是就勒索而言。祂說「求我的」;然而那攻擊的並非求;那威嚇的,若得不著就不肯罷休,並非請求,而是強索;那來時不是叫人憐憫、而是叫人懼怕的,並非等候施捨。
But what do I owe to God, as a denarius to Caesar, except the blood which His own Son shed for me? Now if indeed I owe to God both my manhood and my blood, and am now at that very time in which what I owe to God is demanded of me, then assuredly I commit a fraud against God by acting so that I may not pay what I owe. Nicely have I observed the precept, rendering to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, but denying to God the things that are God's! 'But,' says he, 'I will give to everyone who asks me': in the case of alms, not of extortion. 'To him who asks,' He says; but he who assaults does not ask; he who threatens, if he shall not have received, does not request but extorts; he does not await an alms who comes not to be pitied but to be feared.
16:54
Dabo igitur misericordiae, non timiditatis meae nomine, ubi, qui accepit, deum honorat et benedictionem mihi reddit, non ubi amplius et benefactum praestitisse se credit et praedam suam aspiciens dicit: 'De reatu'. Tascam et inimicum!' Sed etsi inimicitiae et alios habent titulos, non tamen dixit traditorem aut persecutorem aut concussorem; nam huic quanto magis carbones acervabo super caput, si non me redemero! 'Proinde', inquit, 'qui tibi tunicam sustulerit, vel etiam pallium concede.' Ad eum pertinet, qui rem, non qui fidem meam eripere quasierit; concedam et pallium nil [o]minanti; traditionem si minatus fuerit, etiam tunicam reposcam.
所以我要以我憐憫的名義、而非我怯懦的名義施予,就是在那領受者尊崇天主、並以祝福回報我之處——而非在那自以為額外行了甚麼善舉、又望著自己的贓物說「這是為告發他而得的一筆賄賂、外加一個仇敵」之處!但即便仇恨也有別的名目,祂卻未曾說「出賣者」、「迫害者」或「勒索者」;因為對這種人,我若不贖回自己,就更要把炭火堆在他頭上了!「照樣,」祂說,「那奪你內衣的,連外氅也由他拿去。」這是指那圖謀奪我財物、而非奪我信德的人;我要把外氅讓給不加威嚇的人;但他若以出賣相威嚇,我連內衣也要索回。
I will give, therefore, in the name of my mercy, not of my timidity, where he who receives honours God and returns me a blessing — not where he believes himself to have rendered something more and a benefaction besides, and, gazing at his booty, says: 'A bribe, and an enemy too, for the charge against him!' But even if enmities have other titles as well, He nonetheless did not say 'betrayer' or 'persecutor' or 'extortioner'; for upon this man how much more shall I heap coals upon his head, if I do not redeem myself! 'Likewise,' He says, 'to him who takes away thy coat, yield thy cloak also.' This pertains to him who has sought to snatch my property, not my faith; I will yield my cloak to one who makes no threat; but if he threatens betrayal, I will demand back even my coat.
16:55
Omnium iam nunc dominicarum (sententiarum) suae sunt et causae et regulae; termini non in infinitum nec ad omnia spectant; atque adeo omni petenti dari iubet, ipse signum petentibus non dat. Alioquin si omnibus passim petentibus dandum putas, tu mihi videris, non dico vinum febricitanti, sed etiam venenum aut gladium mortem desideranti daturus.
主一切的話語如今都各有其緣由與規則;它們的界限並非指向無限、也非指向一切事物;誠然,祂雖吩咐凡求我們的就給他,祂自己卻不給那些求記號的人記號。不然,你若以為凡有所求的人都當不加分別地施予,在我看來,你就是那樣一個人——我不說會把酒給發燒的病人,甚至會把毒藥或刀劍給那渴求一死的人。
All the Lord's sentences now have both their occasions and their rules; their bounds do not look to the infinite nor to all things; and indeed, though He bids us give to everyone who asks, He Himself gives no sign to those who ask. Otherwise, if thou thinkest one must give indiscriminately to all who ask, thou seemest to me a man who would give — I do not say wine to a fevered patient — but even poison or a sword to one who longs for death.
16:56
Facite autem vobis amicos de mammona quomodo intelligendum sit, parabola praemissa te doceat ad populum Iudaicum dictum, qui, commissam sibi rationem domini cum male administrasset, deberet de mammonae hominibus, quod nos eramus, amicos sibi potius prospicere quam inimicos et relevare nos a debitis peccatorum, quibus deo detinebamur, si nobis id dominica ratione conferrent, ut, cum coepisset ab his deficere gratia, ad nostram fidem refugientes reciperentur in tabernacula aeterna. Quamvis nunc puta aliam interpretationem parabolae et sententiae istius, dum scias verisimile non esse, ut concussores nostri in amicitiam redacti per mammonam recipiant tunc nos in aeterna tabernacula.
至於「你們要藉錢財為自己結交朋友」該如何理解,那先前所立的比喻可以教導你——這話是對猶太百姓說的:他們既拙劣地管理了託付給他們的主的帳目,就當從錢財之人(就是我們從前的光景)中為自己結交朋友、而非結仇,並免除我們罪債——就是那把我們拘於天主之下的罪債——只要他們照主的帳目把這恩惠賜給我們;好使當恩典開始從他們離去時,他們可以投奔我們的信德,被接入永遠的帳幕。但如今,你不妨設想那比喻與話語另有別解,只要你知道這是不大可能的:我們的勒索者藉錢財結為朋友後,日後竟會把我們接入永遠的帳幕。
As for 'Make yourselves friends of mammon,' how it is to be understood the parable set forth may teach thee — spoken to the Jewish people, who, having ill administered the reckoning of the Lord committed to them, ought, out of the men of mammon (which we were), to provide themselves friends rather than enemies, and to relieve us of the debts of our sins, by which we were held to God, if they should confer this upon us by the Lord's reckoning; so that, when grace should begin to fail them, they, taking refuge in our faith, might be received into the eternal tabernacles. But now suppose another interpretation of that parable and sentence, provided thou knowest that it is not likely that our extortioners, brought into friendship through mammon, should then receive us into the eternal tabernacles.
16:57
Sed quid non timiditas persuadebit? Quasi et fugere scriptum permittat et redimere praecipiat! Parum denique est, si tinus aut alius ita eruitur: massaliter totae ecclesiae tributum sibi irrogaverunt! Nescio, dolendum an erubescendum sit, cum in matrioibus beneficiariorum et curiosorum inter tabernarios et ianeos et fures balnearum et aleones et lenones Christiani[s] quoque vectigales continentur. Hanc episcopatus formam apostoli providentius condiderunt, ut regno suo securi frui possent sub obtentu procurandae salutis? Scilicet enim talem pacem Christus ad patrem regrediens mandavit a militibus per Saturnalicia redimendam! XIV.
然而怯懦還有甚麼不能說服人去做的呢?彷彿聖經既准許逃避、又吩咐贖身似的!總之,若只是這人或那人如此得救,還是小事:如今竟有整座整座的教會,成批地自行納貢!當我在收稅官與稽查員的名冊上,在酒館主、屠夫、澡堂賊、賭徒與拉皮條者中間,看見基督徒也被列為納稅人時,我不知該悲傷還是該羞愧。使徒設立主教職,竟是為了這種更「有先見之明」的形式麼——好叫他們藉著謀求救恩的名義,安穩地享受自己的統治?當真,這就是基督在回歸父那裡時所吩咐、要用農神節的賄賂向兵丁買來的那種「平安」!
But what will timidity not persuade a man to? As though Scripture both permitted flight and enjoined ransom! In short, it is a small matter if one man or another is thus rescued: whole churches, wholesale, have imposed a tribute upon themselves! I know not whether one should grieve or blush, when in the registers of the beneficiaries and inspectors, among tavern-keepers and butchers and bath-thieves and gamblers and pimps, Christians too are entered as taxpayers. Was it this form of episcopate that the apostles more providently founded, that they might enjoy their rule in security under the pretext of procuring salvation? Forsooth, it was such a peace that Christ, returning to the Father, commanded to be bought from the soldiers by Saturnalian bribes!
16:58
'Sed quomodo colligemus?' inquis, 'quomodo dominica sollemnia celebrabimus?' Utique quomodo et apostoli, fide, non pecunia tuti, quae fides si montem transferre potest, multo magis militem. Esto sapientia, non praemio cautus! Neque enim statim et a populo eris tutus, si officia militaria redemeris. Una ergo tibi fides et sapientia ad tutelam opus est, quibus non adhibitis et redemptionem tuam potest perdere, adhibitis autem redemptionem nec desiderare. Postremo si colligere interdiu non potest, habes noctem, luce Christi luminos i adversus eam. Non potes discurrere per singulos? si t tibi e[s]t in tribus ecclesia; melius, turbas tuas aliquando non videas, quam addicas.
「但我們該怎樣聚集呢?」你說,「該怎樣舉行主的聖禮呢?」當然,正如使徒所行的——靠信德、而非靠錢財得安穩;這信德若能移山,就更能移開一個兵丁。你要憑智慧謹慎,而非憑賄賂!因為你即使贖免了軍中的職務,也未必立時就能免於民眾的攻擊。所以,你所需要的乃是那唯一的信德與智慧以作保護;這二者若不運用,連你的贖金也會失去,這二者若運用了,你連贖金也不會想要。末了,你若不能白日聚集,你還有黑夜,以基督之光照亮它、對抗那黑夜。你不能逐一往各人那裡奔走麼?你若有三個人組成的教會,那就好了;你有時寧可不見你的群眾,也強過把他們出賣。
'But how shall we assemble?' thou sayest; 'how shall we celebrate the Lord's solemnities?' Assuredly, just as the apostles did — safe by faith, not by money; which faith, if it can remove a mountain, much more can it remove a soldier. Be cautious by wisdom, not by a bribe! For thou wilt not straightway be safe even from the populace, if thou hast bought off military offices. One faith, then, and wisdom for protection is what thou needest; and if these be not employed, thy very ransom too can be lost, but if they be employed, thou wilt not even desire a ransom. Lastly, if thou canst not assemble by day, thou hast the night, luminous with the light of Christ against it. Canst thou not run about to each in turn? If thou hast a church in three persons, it is well; better that thou shouldst sometimes not see thy crowds, than that thou shouldst sell them.
16:59
Serva Christo virginem sponsam; nemo quaestum de ea faciat. Haec tibi, frater, dura forsitan et intolerabilia videntur, sed recita deum dixisse: Qui capit, capiat, id est, qui non capit, discedat. Non potest, qui pati timet, ei esse, qui passus est; at qui pati non timet, iste erit perfectus in dilectione, utique dei; perfecta enim dilectio foras mittit timorem. Et ideo multi vocati, pauci electi ; non quaeritur, qui latam viam sequi paratus sit, sed qui angustam; et ideo paraclitus necessarius, deductor omnium veritatum, exhortator omnium tolerantiarum.
要為基督守住那童貞的新娘;不要讓任何人以她牟利。弟兄,這些話在你看來或許顯得嚴苛、難以忍受;但請你複誦天主所說的:「凡能領受的,就領受罷」——也就是說,凡不能領受的,就離去罷。那懼怕受苦的人,不能屬於那受過苦的主;但那不懼怕受苦的人,必在愛內成全——當然是在天主的愛內;因為圓滿的愛把懼怕驅逐於外。因此,被召的人多,被選的人少;所尋找的不是那甘願走寬路的人,而是走窄路的人;因此,護慰者是不可少的,祂是引入一切真理的嚮導,是勸人堅忍一切苦難的勉勵者。
Keep the virgin bride for Christ; let no one make gain of her. These things, brother, may perhaps seem to thee harsh and intolerable; but recite that God has said: 'Let him who can receive it, receive it' — that is, let him who cannot receive it depart. He who fears to suffer cannot belong to Him who suffered; but he who does not fear to suffer, he shall be perfect in love — the love of God, assuredly; for perfect love casts out fear. And therefore many are called, but few chosen; it is not sought who is ready to follow the broad way, but who the narrow; and therefore the Paraclete is necessary, the leader into all truths, the exhorter to all endurances.
16:60
Quem qui receperunt, neque fugere persecutionem neque redimere noverunt, habentes ipsum, qui pro nobis erit, sicut locuturus in interrogatione ita iuvaturus in passione. Text edited by V. Bulhart (1957). Scanned by Roger Pearse, Ipswich, 2003.
凡接受了祂的人,既不懂得逃避迫害,也不懂得贖免迫害,因為他們擁有那位要為我們的主——祂既要在審問中為我們說話,也要在受苦中援助我們。本文由 V. Bulhart 校訂(1957年)。由 Roger Pearse 掃描,英格蘭伊普斯威奇,2003年。
Those who have received Him have learned neither to flee persecution nor to buy it off, having Him who will be for us — as He is about to speak in the interrogation, so is He about to help in the suffering. Text edited by V. Bulhart (1957). Scanned by Roger Pearse, Ipswich, 2003.
← 上一段
← 第 15 章第 17 章 →
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435