📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Greek Fathers › Fragments of Irenaeus

Fragments of Irenaeus 1-1 part 1/3

Greek original · 9 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 1-1:prooemium–1-1:8 (31 verses in all)

ch. 1-2 →
next part →
1-1:prooemium
ἘΠΙ Ἐπεὶ τὴν ἀλήθειαν παραπεμπόμενοί τινες, ἐπεισάγουσι λόγους ψευδεῖς καὶ γενεαλογίας ματαίας, αἵτινες ζητήσεις μᾶλλον παρέχουσι, καθὼς Ἀπόστολός φησιν,η οἰκοδομὴν Θεοῦ τὴν ἐν πίστει· καὶ διὰ τῆς πανούργως συγκεκροτημένης κεκροτημένης πιθανότητος παράγουσι τὸν νοῦν τῶν ἀπειροτέρων, καὶ αἰχμαλωτίζουσιν αὐτοὺς, ῥᾳδιουργοῦντες τὰ λόγια Κυρίου, ἐξηγηταὶ κακοὶ τῶν καλῶς εἰρημένων γινόμενοι· καὶ πολλοὺς ἀνατρέπουσιν, ἀπάγοντες αὐτοὺς προφάσει γνώσεως ἀπὸ τοῦ τόδε τὸ πᾶν συστησαμένου καὶ κεκοσμηκότος, ὡς ὑψηλότερόν τι καὶ μεῖζον ἔχοντες ἐπιδεῖξαι τοῦ τὸν οὐρανὸν, καὶ τὴν γῆν, καὶ πάντα τὰ ἐν αὐτοῖς πεποιηκότος Θεοῦ· πιθανῶς μὲν ἐπαγόμενοι διὰ λόγων τέχνης τοὺς ἀκεραίους εἰς τὸν τοῦ ζητεῖν τρόπον, ἀπιθάνως δὲ ἀπολλύντες αὐτοὺς ἐν τῷ βλάσφημον καὶ ἀσεβῆ τὴν γνώμην αὐτῶν κατασκευάζειν εἰς τὸν Δημιουργὸν, μηδὲ ἐν τῷ διακρίνειν δυναμένων τὸ ψεῦδος ἀπὸ τοῦ ἀληθοῦς· γὰρ πλάνη καθʼ αὑτὴν μὲν οὐκ ἐπιδείκνυται, ἵνα μὴ γυμνωθεῖσα γένηται κατάφωρος· πιθανῷ δὲ περιβλήματι πανούργως κοσμουμένη, καὶ αὐτῆς τῆς ἀληθείας ἀληθεστέραν ἑαυτὴν παρέχειν παρέχει φαίνεσθαι διὰ τῆς ἔξωθεν φαντασίας τοῖς ἀπειροτέροις· καθὼς ὑπὸ τοῦ κρείττονος ἡμῶν εἴρηται ἐπὶ τῶν τοιούτων, ὅτι λίθον τὸν τίμιον σμάραγδον ὄντα, καὶ πολυτίμητόν τισιν, ὕαλος ἐνυβρίζει διὰ τέχνης παρομοιουμένη, ὁπόταν μὴ παρῇ σθένων δοκιμάσαι, καὶ τέχνῃ τέχνην διελέγξαι τὴν πανούργως ούργως γενομένην· ὅταν δὲ ἐπιμιγῇ χαλκὸς εἰς τὸν ἄργυρον, τίς εὐκόλως δυνήσεται τοῦτον ἀκεραίως ἀκέραιος ὤν δοκιμάσαι; ἵνα οὗν μὴ παρὰ τὴν ἡμετέραν αἰτίαν συναρπάζωνταί τινες, ὡς πρόβατα ὑπὸ λύκων, ἀγνοοῦντες αὐτοὺς διὰ τὴν ἔξωθεν τῆς προβατείου δορᾶς ἐπιβουλὴν, οὓς φυλάσσειν παρήγγελκεν ἡμῖν Κύριος, ὅμοια μὲν λαλοῦντας, ἀνόμοια δὲ φρονοῦντας, ἀναγκαῖον ἡγησάμην, ἐντυχὼν τοῖς ὑπομνήμασι τῶν, ὡς αὐτοὶ λέγουσιν, Οὐαλεντίνου μαθητῶν, ἐνίοις δʼ αὐτῶν καὶ συμβαλὼν, καὶ καταλαβόμενος τὴν γνώμην αὐτῶν, μηνύσαι σοι, ἀγαπητὲ, τὰ τερατώδη καὶ βαθέα μυστήρια, οὐ πάντες Χωροῦσιν, ἐπεὶ μὴ πάντες τὸν ἐγκέφαλον εξεπτύςασιν, ὅπως καὶ σὺ μαθὼν αὐτὰ, πᾶσι τοῖς μετά σου φανερὰ ποιήσῃς, καὶ παραινέσῃς αὐτοῖς φυλάξασθαι τὸν βυθὸν τῆς ἀνοίας, καὶ τῆς εἰς Χριστὸν Θεὸν βλασφημίας. Καὶ, καθὼς δύναμις ἡμῖν, τήν τε γνώμην αὐτῶν τῶν νῦν παραδιδασκόντων, λέγω δὴ τῶν περὶ Πτολεμαῖον, ἀπάνθισμα οὖσαν τῆς Οὐαλεντίνου σχολῆς, συντόμως καὶ σαφῶς ἀπαγγελοῦμεν, καὶ ἀφορμὰς δώσομεν κατὰ τὴν ἡμετέραν μετριότητα, πρὸς τὸ ἀνατρέπειν αὐτὴν, ἀλλόκοτα καὶ ἀνάρμοστα τῇ ἀληθείᾳ ἐπιδεικνύντες τὰ ὑπʼ αὐτῶν λεγόμενα, μήτε συγγράφειν εἰθισμένοι, μήτε λόγων τέχνην ἠσκηκότες· ἀγάπης δὲ ἡμᾶς προτρεπομένης σοί τε καὶ πᾶσι τοῖς μετά σου μηνύσαι τὰ μέχρι μὲν νῦν κεκρθμμένα, ἤδη δὲ κατὰ τὴν χάριν τοῦ Θεοῦ εἰς φανερὸν ἐληλυθότα διδάγματα· οὐδὲν γάρ ἐστι κεκαλυμμένον, οὐκ ἀποκαλυφθήσεται, καὶ κρυπτὸν, οὐ γνωσθήσεται. Οὐκ ἐπιζητήσεις δὲ παῤ ἡμῶν τῶν ἐν Κελτοῖς διατριβόντων, καὶ περὶ βάρβαρον διάλεκτον τὸ πλεῖστον ἀσχολουμένων, λόγων τέχνην, ἣν οὐκ ἐμάθομεν, οὔτε δύναμιν συγγραφέως, ἣν οὐκ ἠσκήσαμεν, οὔτε καλλωπισμὸν λέξεων, οὔτε πιθανότητα, ἣν οὐκ οἴδαμεν· ἀλλὰ ἁπλῶς, καὶ ἀληθῶς, καὶ ἰδιωτικῶς τὰ μετὰ ἀγάπης σοι γραφέντα, μετὰ ἀγάπης σὺ προσδέξῃ, καὶ αὐτὸς αὐξήσεις αὐτὰ παρὰ σεαυτῷ, ἅτε ἱκανώτερος ἡμῶν τυγχάνων, οἱονεὶ σπέρματα καὶ ἀρχὰς λαβὼν παῤ ἡμῶν, καὶ ἐν τῷ πλάτει σου τοῦ νοῦ ἐπὶ πολὺ καρποφορήσεις τὰ δἰ ὀλίγων ὑφʼ ἡμῶν εἰρημένα, καὶ δυνατῶς παραστήσεις τοῖς μετὰ σοῦ τὰ ἀσθενῶς ὑφʼ ἡμῶν ἀπηγγελμένα· καὶ ὡς ἡμεῖς ἐφιλοτιμήθημεν, πάλαι ζητοῦντός σου μαθεῖν τὴν γνώμην αὐτῶν, μὴ μόνον σοι ποιῆσαι φανερὰν, ἀλλά καὶ ἐφόδια δοῦναι πρὸς τὸ ἐπιδεικνύειν αὐτὴν Ψεοδῆ· οὕτω δὲ καὶ σὺ φιλοτίμως τοῖς λοιποῖς διακονήσεις, κατά τὴν χάριν τὴν ὑπὸ τοῦ Κυρίου σοὶ δεδομένην, εἰς τὸ μηκέτι παρασύρεσθαι τοὺς ἀνθρώπους ὑπὸ τῆς ἐκείνων πιθανολογίας, οὔσης τοιαύτης
Inasmuch as certain men, setting the truth aside, are bringing in lying words and vain genealogies, which, as the Apostle says, minister questions rather than the edification of God which is in faith; and by means of their craftily constructed plausibility they lead astray the minds of the more inexperienced and take them captive, falsifying the oracles of the Lord and proving themselves bad interpreters of what was rightly spoken. They overturn many, drawing them away under the pretext of knowledge from him who founded and adorned this universe, as though they had something higher and greater to reveal than the God who made heaven and earth and all that is in them. With persuasive art they entice the simple into the habit of inquiry, but then unpersuasively destroy them by framing their opinion blasphemously and impiously concerning the Creator, while those they deceive are unable to distinguish falsehood from truth. For error does not show itself by itself, lest, being stripped bare, it be detected; but craftily adorned with a plausible covering, it contrives through outward appearance to present itself, to the more inexperienced, as truer even than the truth itself. As one better than we has said of such people, that a precious stone, an emerald of great value to some, is mimicked and counterfeited by glass made to resemble it through art, whenever there is no one able to test it and by skill to expose the skillfully made forgery; and when bronze is mixed with silver, who, being inexperienced, will easily be able to test it? Lest, then, through our fault some be carried off like sheep by wolves, not recognizing them because of their outward covering of sheep's skin (those whom the Lord charged us to beware of, speaking like us but thinking otherwise), I judged it necessary, having read the treatises of those who, as they themselves say, are disciples of Valentinus, and having met with some of them and grasped their opinion, to disclose to you, beloved, their monstrous and profound mysteries, which not all can contain, since not all have voided their brains; so that you also, learning them, may make them plain to all who are with you and exhort them to beware of the depth of folly and of the blasphemy against Christ God. And, so far as we are able, we shall briefly and clearly report the opinion of those who are now teaching these things, I mean the school of Ptolemaeus, which is a flower of the school of Valentinus, and we shall provide, according to our modest ability, the means to refute it, showing that what they say is foreign to and inconsistent with the truth. We are not accustomed to writing, nor have we practiced the art of words; but love urges us to disclose to you and to all who are with you those teachings hitherto hidden, but now by the grace of God come to light. For there is nothing covered that shall not be revealed, nor hidden that shall not be made known. You will not expect from us, who dwell among the Celts and are mostly occupied with a barbarous tongue, any art of speech, which we have not learned, nor any power of composition, which we have not practiced, nor beauty of words, nor persuasiveness, which we do not know; but you will receive in love what we have written to you in love, simply and truly and after the manner of a layman, and you yourself, being more capable than we, will enlarge it for yourself, as one who has received from us, as it were, seeds and beginnings, and in the breadth of your mind will bring forth abundant fruit from what we have said in few words, and will powerfully present to those with you what we have feebly reported. And as we have been zealous, since you have long sought to learn their opinion, not only to make it plain to you but also to give you means to show it false, so will you also zealously serve the rest, according to the grace given you by the Lord, that men may no longer be carried away by their plausible reasoning, which is of the following kind.
有些人離棄真理,引進虛謊的言論與無益的家譜,正如使徒所說,這些只是引起爭辯,而非建立那在信心裡屬神的事;他們又藉著巧妙編造的似是而非之說,引誘那些較無經驗者的心思,擄掠他們,竄改主的聖言,成為對美善之言的惡劣解經者。他們傾覆許多人,假借「知識」為名,把人從那位創立並裝飾這宇宙者面前引開,彷彿他們有比那位造了天、地及其中萬物之神更高、更大的事可以指明。他們以言辭的技巧巧妙地引誘純真之人進入探究的途徑,卻又以不可信的方式毀滅他們——因他們對造物主(Demiurge/造物主)構築了褻瀆不敬的見解,而受騙者卻無從分辨真偽。因為謬誤本身並不顯露自己,免得一旦被剝光便被識破;它乃以似是而非的外衣巧妙妝飾自己,藉著外表的假象,使自己在那些無經驗的人眼中顯得比真理本身更真。正如一位比我們更高明者論到這等人時所說:寶貴的綠寶石,在某些人看為極珍貴,卻被以技巧仿造的玻璃所褻瀆冒充,每當無人能夠鑑驗、以技藝揭穿那巧妙的贗品時便是如此;又當銅摻入銀中,無經驗的人誰能輕易鑑別出來呢?因此,免得因我們的疏忽,有人像羊被狼擄去——因外披羊皮的詭計而不認得牠們(主曾吩咐我們要防備這等人,他們說話與我們相同,存心卻不同)——我認為有必要,在我讀過那些自稱為瓦倫提努(Valentinus)門徒之人的論著、又與其中一些人會面並掌握了他們的見解之後,把那些怪誕而幽深的奧祕向你揭示,親愛的;這些奧祕並非人人能容受,因為並非人人都已掏空了腦袋。如此,你既學了這些,就可向凡與你同在的人講明,並勸勉他們防備那愚妄的深淵,以及對基督神的褻瀆。我們也要盡力,簡明清楚地陳述那些如今傳授此道之人的見解——我是指圍繞托勒密(Ptolemaeus)的那一派,乃是瓦倫提努門派的精華——並按我們微薄的才力,提供駁斥它的依據,指明他們所說的乃是與真理相悖、與真理不合的。我們素來不慣寫作,也未操練言辭的技藝;惟有愛激勵我們,要向你和凡與你同在的人揭示那至今隱藏、如今卻已藉神的恩典顯明出來的教訓。因為掩蓋的事沒有不被揭露的,隱藏的事沒有不被人知道的。你也不要指望從我們這些住在凱爾特人中間、大半操著蠻族方言的人身上,得著我們未曾學過的言辭技巧、未曾操練的著述能力,或我們所不懂的辭藻之美與說服之力;你只要以愛心領受我們以愛心、單純真實、按平民方式寫給你的這些話,並要在你自己裡面使它增長——因你比我們更有能力——彷彿從我們領受了種子與根基,又在你寬廣的心思中,使我們三言兩語所說的多結果子,並有力地向與你同在的人陳明我們所軟弱陳述的。我們既因你久已渴望明白他們的見解而殷勤努力,不單向你講明,更給你裝備去指明它的虛謊;照樣,你也要照主所賜你的恩典,殷勤地服事其餘的人,使人不再被他們似是而非的花言巧語擄去——那花言巧語乃是如下這般的。
1-1:1
ΛΕΓΟΥΣ γάρ τινα εἶναι ἐν ἀοράτοις καὶ ἀκατονομάστοις ὑψώμασι τέλειον Αἰῶνα προόντα· τοῦτον δὲ καὶ προαρχὴν καὶ προπάτορα καὶ υθὸν καλοῦσιν. ὑπάρχονταδ αὐτὸν ἀχώρυτον καὶ ἀόρατον, ἀΐδιόν τε καὶ ἀγέννητον. ἐν ἡσυχίᾳ καὶ ἠραμίᾳ πολλῇ γεγονέναι ἐν ἀπείροις αἰῶσι χρόνων. συνυπάρχεινδ αὐτῷ καὶ Ἔννοιαν, ἣν δὲ καὶ Χάριν, καὶ Σιγὴν ὀνομάζουσι· καὶ ἐννονθῆναί ποτε ἀφʼ ἑαυτοῦ προβαλέσθαι τὸν υθὸν τοῦτον, ἀρχὴν τῶν πάντων καὶ καθάπερ σπέρμα, τὴν προβολὴν ταύτην, ἣν προβαλέσθαι ἐνενοήθη, καὶ καθέσθαι ὡς ἐν μήτρα τῇ συνυπαρχούσῃ ἑαυτῷ Σιγῇ· ταύτην δὲ ὑποδεξαμένην τὸ σπέρμα τοῦτο καὶ ἐγκύμονα γενομένην, ἀποκυῆσαι Νοῦν, ὅμοιόν τε καὶ ἶσον τῷ προβαλόντι, καὶ μόνον χωροῦντα τὸ μέγεθος τοῦ Πατρός· τὸν δὲ Νοῦν τοῦτον καὶ Μονογενῆ καλοῦσι, καὶ Πατέρα, καὶ Ἀρχὴν τῶν πάντων· συμπροβεβλῆσθαι δὲ αὐτῷ Ἀλήθειαν· καὶ εἶναι ταύτην πρῶτον καὶ ἀρχέγονον Πυθαγορικὴν τετρακτὺν, ἣν καὶ ῥίζαν τῶν πάντων καλοῦσιν· ἔστι γάρ Βοθὸς καὶ Σιγὴ, ἔπειτα Νοῦς καὶ Ἀλήθεια. Αἰσθόμενόν τε τὸν Μονογενῆ τοῦτον ἐφʼ οἷς προεβλήθη, προβαλεῖν καὶ αὐτὸν Λόγον καὶ Ζωὴν, πατέρα πάντων τῶν μετʼ αὐτὸν ἐσομένων, καὶ ἀρχὴν καὶ μόφωσιν παντὸς τοῦ πληρώματος. Ἐκ δὴ τοῦ Λόγου καὶ τῆς Ζωῆς προβεβλῆσθαι κατὰ συζυγίαν Ἄνθρωπον καὶ Ἐκκλησίαν· καὶ εἶναι ταύτην ἀρχέγονον Ὀγδοάδα, ῥίζαν καὶ ὑπόστασιν τῶν πάντων, τέτρασιν ὀνόμασι παῤ αὐτοῖς καλουμένων, καλουμένην Βυθῷ, καὶ Νῷ, καὶ Λόγῳ, καὶ Ἀνθρώπῳ· εἶναι γὰρ αὐτῶν ἕκαστον ἀῤῥενόθηλυν· οὕτως πρῶτον τὸν Προπάτορα ἡνῶσθαι κατὰ συζυγίαν τῇ ἑαυτοῦ Ἐννοίᾳ· τὸν δὲ Μονογενῆ, τουτέστι τὸν Νοῦν, τῇ Ἀληθείᾳ· τὸν δὲ Λόγον τῇ Ζωῇ, καὶ τὸν Ἄνθρωπον τῇ Ἐκκλησίᾳ. Τούτους δὲ τοὺς Αἰῶνας εἰς δόξαν τοῦ Πατρὸς προβεβλημένους, βουληθέντας καὶ αὐτοὺς διὰ τοῦ ἰδίου δοξάσαι τὸν Πατέρα, προβαλεῖν προβολὰς ἐν συζυγίᾳ· τὸν μὲν Λόγον καὶ τὴν Ζωὴν, μετὰ τὸ προβαλέσθαι τὸν Ἄνθρωπον καὶ τὴν Ἐκκλησίαν, ἄλλους δέκα Αἰῶνας, ὧν τὰ ὀνόματα λέγουσι ταῦτα· Βύθιος καὶ Μίξις, Ἀγήρατος καὶ Ἑνώσις, Αὐτοφυὴς καὶ Ἡδονὴ, Ἀκίνητος καὶ Σύγκρασις, Μονογενὴς καὶ Μακαρία· οὗτοι δέκα Αἰῶνες, οὓς καὶ φάσκουσιν ἐκ Λόγου καὶ Ζωῆς προβεβλῆσθαι. τὸν δὲ Ἄνθρωπον καὶ αὐτὸν προβαλεῖν μετὰ τῆς Ἐκκλησίας Αἰῶνας δώδεκα, οἷς ταῦτα τὰ ὀνόματα χαρίζονται· Παράκλητος καὶ Πίστις, Πατρικὸς καὶ Ἐλπὶς, Μητρικὸς καὶ Ἀγάπη, Ἀείνους καὶ Σύνεσις, Ἐκκλησιαστικὸς καὶ Μακαριότης, Θλητὸς καὶ Σοφία· οὗτοί εἰσιν οἱ τριάκοντα Αἰῶνες τῆς πλάνης αὐτῶν, οἱ σεσιγημένοι καὶ μὴ γινωσκόμενοι· τοῦτο τὸ ἀόρατον καὶ πνευματικὸν κατʼ αὐτοὺς πλήρωμα, τριχῆ διεσταμένον εἰς ὀγδοάδα, καὶ δεκάδα, καὶ δωδεκάδα. Καὶ διὰ τοῦτο τὸν Σωτῆρα λέγουσιν (οὐδὲ γὰρ Μύριον ὀνομάζειν αὐτὸν θέλουσι) τριάκοντα ἔτεσι κατὰ τὸ φανερὸν μηδὲν πεποιηκέναι, ἐπιδεικνύντα τὸ μυστήριον τούτων τῶν Αἰώνων. Ἀλλὰ καὶ ἐπὶ τῆς παραβολῆς τῶν εἰς τὸν ἀμπελῶνα πεμπομένων ἐργατῶν φασὶ φανερώτατα τοὺς τριάκοντα τούτους Αἰῶνας μεμηνύσθαι· πέμπονται γὰρ οἱ μὲν περὶ πρώτην ὥραν, οἱ δὲ περὶ τρίτην, οἱ δὲ περὶ ἕκτην, οἱ δὲ περὶ ἐνάτην, ἄλλοι δὲ περὶ ἑνδεκάτην· συντιθέμεναι οὖν αἱ προειρημέναι ὧραι εἰς ἑαυτὰς, τὸν τῶν τριάκοντα ἀριθμὸν ἀναπληροῦσι· μία γὰρ, καὶ τρεῖς, καὶ ἓξ, καὶ ἐννέα, καὶ ἕνδεκα, τριάκοντα γίνονται· διὰ δὲ τῶν ὡρῶν τοὺς Αἰῶνας μεμηνύσθαι θέλουσι. Καὶ ταῦτʼ εἶναι τὰ μεγάλα καὶ θαυμαστὰ καὶ ἀπόῤῥητα Μυστήρια, καρποφοροῦσιν αὐτοὶ, καὶ εἴ που τι τῶν ἐν πλήθει εἰρημένων ἐν ταῖς γραφαῖς δυνηθείη προσαρμόσαι, καὶ εἰκάσαι τῷ πλάσματι αὐτῶν
They say that in invisible and unnameable heights there is a certain perfect Aeon who existed before all things, whom they call Forefather and First-beginning and Bythos (Depth). He is uncontainable and invisible, eternal and unbegotten, and existed in great quiet and stillness through boundless ages of time. With him co-existed Thought, whom they also name Grace and Sige (Silence). At length this Bythos took thought to put forth from himself a beginning of all things; and this emission which he resolved to put forth he deposited, like a seed, as in a womb, in the Sige who co-existed with him. She, receiving this seed and becoming pregnant, brought forth Nous (Mind), like and equal to the one who emitted him, alone able to contain the greatness of the Father. This Nous they also call Only-begotten and Father and Beginning of all things. Together with him was emitted Aletheia (Truth); and these constitute the first and original Pythagorean Tetrad, which they also call the root of all things—namely Bythos and Sige, then Nous and Aletheia. This Only-begotten, perceiving for what purpose he had been put forth, himself emitted Logos (Word) and Zoe (Life), the father of all who were to come after him and the beginning and formation of the whole Pleroma. From Logos and Zoe were emitted, in conjugal pairing, Anthropos (Man) and Ecclesia (Church); and this is the original Ogdoad, the root and substance of all things, called among them by four names: Bythos, Nous, Logos, and Anthropos. For each of them is male-female: thus first the Forefather was united in pairing with his own Thought; the Only-begotten, that is Nous, with Aletheia; Logos with Zoe; and Anthropos with Ecclesia. These Aeons, having been emitted for the Father's glory and themselves wishing to glorify the Father by their own act, put forth emissions in pairs. Logos and Zoe, after emitting Anthropos and Ecclesia, emitted ten other Aeons, whose names they give as these: Bythios and Mixis, Ageratos and Henosis, Autophyes and Hedone, Akinetos and Synkrasis, Monogenes and Makaria—these are the ten Aeons whom they assert to have been emitted from Logos and Zoe. And Anthropos likewise, together with Ecclesia, emitted twelve Aeons, on whom they bestow these names: Parakletos and Pistis, Patrikos and Elpis, Metrikos and Agape, Aeinous and Synesis, Ekklesiastikos and Makariotes, Theletos and Sophia. These are the thirty Aeons of their error, who are kept silent and unknown. This is, according to them, the invisible and spiritual Pleroma, divided in three into an Ogdoad, a Decad, and a Dodecad. And for this reason they say that the Savior (for they do not wish to name him 'Lord') did nothing in public for thirty years, displaying the mystery of these Aeons. Moreover, in the parable of the laborers sent into the vineyard they say these thirty Aeons are most plainly indicated; for some are sent about the first hour, some about the third, some about the sixth, some about the ninth, and others about the eleventh. Now the aforesaid hours added together make up the number thirty: for one and three and six and nine and eleven make thirty; and so by the hours they would have the Aeons indicated. And these, they say, are the great and wonderful and ineffable Mysteries which they bring forth as fruit; and wherever anything said in many ways in the Scriptures can be fitted in, they liken it to their fabrication.
他們說,在那不可見、不可名的高處,有一位完全的伊涌(Aeon),先萬有而存在;他們稱他為元父(Forefather)、起初之先(First-beginning),又稱為深淵(Bythos)。他是不可容納、不可見的,是永恆而非受生的,在極大的安靜與寧息中,歷經無窮的時間之世代而存在。與他同存的還有「意念」(Thought),他們又稱她為恩典(Grace)與沉默(Sige)。這深淵終於起意,要從自己發出萬有的起初,將他所決意發出的這「發射」(emission),如同種子般,安置於與他同存的沉默(Sige)裡,如在母腹之中。沉默領受了這種子,懷了孕,便生出心思(Nous),與那發出者相似且相等,惟獨他能容納父的浩大。這心思,他們又稱為獨生者(Only-begotten)、父,以及萬有之起初。與他一同被發出的還有真理(Aletheia);這就構成了那首先且原初的「畢達哥拉斯四元組」(Tetrad),他們又稱之為萬有之根,即深淵與沉默,其次是心思與真理。這獨生者既覺察自己被發出的目的,便也發出了道(Logos)與生命(Zoe),他是在他以後一切要存在者之父,是全普累若麻(Pleroma,豐盛)的起初與成形。從道與生命,又按配偶(成對)發出了人(Anthropos)與教會(Ecclesia);這就是那原初的八元組(Ogdoad),是萬有之根與本體,在他們中間以四個名稱稱呼:深淵、心思、道、人。因為他們各自都是雌雄同體的:如此,元父首先與他自己的意念按配偶聯合;獨生者,即心思,與真理聯合;道與生命聯合;人與教會聯合。這些伊涌既為父的榮耀而被發出,自己也願以自己的行動榮耀父,便成對地發出眾「發射」。道與生命,在發出人與教會之後,又發出另外十個伊涌,他們所給的名字如下:Bythios(深者)與 Mixis(交合),Ageratos(不老者)與 Henosis(聯合),Autophyes(自生者)與 Hedone(歡愉),Akinetos(不動者)與 Synkrasis(混合),Monogenes(獨生者)與 Makaria(蒙福者)——這就是那十個伊涌,他們聲稱是從道與生命發出的。人也照樣,連同教會,發出十二個伊涌,他們賜予這些名字:Parakletos(保惠師)與 Pistis(信),Patrikos(屬父者)與 Elpis(望),Metrikos(屬母者)與 Agape(愛),Aeinous(常思者)與 Synesis(悟性),Ekklesiastikos(屬教會者)與 Makariotes(福樂),Theletos(願者)與 Sophia(智慧)。這就是他們謬說中的三十個伊涌,是被緘默而不為人知的。照他們所說,這就是那不可見、屬靈的普累若麻,三重劃分為八元組、十元組與十二元組。為此緣故,他們說救主(因他們不願稱他為「主」)在三十年間於明處一無所作,乃是要顯出這些伊涌的奧祕。此外,在那些被差進葡萄園做工之人的比喻中,他們說這三十個伊涌最為明顯地被指明了;因為有的約在第一時辰被差,有的約在第三時辰,有的約在第六時辰,有的約在第九時辰,還有的約在第十一時辰。如今把上述各時辰相加,便湊成三十之數:因為一、三、六、九、十一相加為三十;他們便要藉這些時辰指明那些伊涌。他們說,這些就是他們所結之果——那偉大、奇妙、不可言喻的奧祕;凡聖經中以多種方式所說的,若能勉強套上,他們便把它比附到自己的虛構上。
1-1:2
Τὸν μὲν οὖν Προπάτορα αὐτῶν γινώσκεσθαι μόνῳ λέγουσι τῷ ἐξ αὐτοῦ γεγονότι Μονογενεῖ, τουτέστι τῷ Νῷ· τοῖς δὲ λοιποῖς πᾶσιν ἀόρατον καὶ ἀκατάληπτον ὑπάρχειν· μόνος δὲ Νοῦς κατ αὐτοὺς ἐτέρπετο θεωρῶν τὸν Πατέρα, καὶ τὸ μέγεθος τὸ ἀμέτρητον αὐτοῦ κατανοῶν ἠγάλλετο· καὶ διενοεῖτο καὶ τοῖς λοιποῖς αἰῶσιν ἀνακοινώσασθαι τὸ μέγεθος τοῦ Πατρὸς, ἡλίκος τε καὶ ὅσος ὑπῆρχε, καὶ ὡς ἦν ἄναρχός τε καὶ ἀχώρητος, καὶ οὐ καταληπτὸς ἰδεῖν· κατέσχε δὲ αὐτὸν Σιγὴ βουλήσει τοῦ Πατρὸς, διὰ τὸ θέλειν πάντας αὐτοὺς εἰς ἔννοιαν καὶ πόθον ζητήσεως τοῦ προειρημένου Προπάτορος αὐτῶν ἀγαγεῖν. Καὶ οἱ μὲν λοιποὶ ὁμοίως Αἰῶνες ἡσυχῇ πως ἐπεπόθουν τὸν προβολέα τοῦ σπέρματος αὐτῶν ἰδεῖν, καὶ τὴν ἄναρχον ῥίζαν ἱστορῆσαι· προήλατο δὲ πολὺ τελευταῖος καὶ νεώτατος τῆς δωδεκάδος, τῆς ὑπὸ τοῦ Ἀνθρώπου καὶ τῆς Ἐκκλησίας, προβεβλημένος Αἰὼν, τουτέστιν Σοφία, καὶ ἔπαθε πάθος ἄνευ τῆς ἐπιπλοκῆς τοῦ ζνγοῦ συζ. τοῦ Θελητοῦ· ἐνήρξατο μὲν ἐν τοῖς περὶ τὸν Νοῦν καὶ τὴν Ἀλήθειαν, ἀπέσκηψε δὲ εἰς τοῦτον τὸν παρατραπέντα, πρόφασιν μὲν ἀγάπης, τόλμης δὲ, διὰ τὸ μὴ κεκοινωνῆσθαι τῷ Πατρὶ τῷ τελείῳ, καθὼς καὶ Νοῦς. Τὸ δὲ πάθος εἶναι ζήτησιν τοῦ Πατρός· ἤθελε γὰρ, ὡς λέγουσι, τὸ μέγεθος αὐτοῦ καταλαβεῖν· ἔπειτα μὴ δυνηθῆναι, διὰ τὸ ἀδυνάτῳ ἐπιβαλεῖν πράγματι, καὶ ἐν πολλῷ πάνυ ἀγῶνι γενόμενον, διά τε τὸ μέγεθος τοῦ βάθους, καὶ τὸ ἀνεξιχνίαστον τοῦ Πατρὸς, καὶ τὴν πρὸς αὐτὸν στοργὴν, ἐκτεινόμενον ἀεὶ ἐπὶ τὸ πρόσθεν, ὑπὸ τῆς γλυκύτητος αὐτοῦ τελευταῖον ἂν καταπεπόσθαι, καὶ ἀναλελύσθαι εἰς τὴν ὅλην οὐσίαν, εἰ μὴ τῇ στηριζούσῃ καὶ ἐκτὸς τοῦ ἀῤῥήτου μεγέθους φυλασσούσῃ τὰ ὅλα συνέτυχε δυνάμει. Ταύτην δὲ τὴν δύναμιν καὶ Ὅρον καλοῦσιν, ὑφʼ ἧς ἐπεσχῆσθαι καὶ ἐστηρίχθαι, καὶ μόγις ἐπιστρέψαντα εἰς ἑαοτὸν, καὶ παισθέντα ὅτι ἀκατάληπτός ἐστιν Πατὴρ, ἀποθέσθαι τὴν προτέραν ἐνθύμησιν σὺν τῷ ἐπιγινομένῳ πάθει ἐκ τοῦ ἐκπλήκτου ἐκείνου θαύματος
Now they say that their Forefather is known only to the Only-begotten who came into being from him, that is, to Nous; while to all the rest he is invisible and incomprehensible. According to them, Nous alone took delight in beholding the Father and rejoiced in contemplating his immeasurable greatness; and he was minded to communicate to the rest of the Aeons the greatness of the Father—how great and vast he was, and how he was without beginning and uncontainable and not to be comprehended by sight. But Sige restrained him by the Father's will, since the Father wished to lead them all to a thought and longing to seek out their aforesaid Forefather. And the rest of the Aeons likewise quietly longed in some way to see the one who had emitted their seed and to behold the root that had no beginning. But the last and youngest Aeon of the Dodecad, the one emitted by Anthropos and Ecclesia—that is, Sophia—rushed far ahead and suffered a passion apart from the embrace of her consort Theletos. This passion began among those around Nous and Aletheia, but turned aside into this perverted one, under the pretext of love, though in reality of audacity, because she had not been admitted to fellowship with the perfect Father as Nous had been. The passion was a search after the Father; for she wished, as they say, to grasp his greatness. Then, being unable to do so, because she had attempted an impossible thing, and being plunged into a very great struggle—both because of the magnitude of the Depth and the unsearchableness of the Father and her affection toward him—forever stretching forward, she would at last have been swallowed up by his sweetness and dissolved into the universal substance, had she not met with the power that strengthens and guards all things outside the ineffable greatness. This power they also call Horos (Limit); and by it she was checked and made firm, and with difficulty turned back to herself and convinced that the Father is incomprehensible, and laid aside her former intention along with the passion that had come upon her out of that astounding amazement.
如今他們說,他們的元父惟獨被那從他而出的獨生者,即心思(Nous),所認識;而對其餘的一切,他都是不可見、不可測度的。照他們所說,惟有心思以仰望父為樂,思想他那無法測度的浩大而歡欣鼓舞;他便有意向其餘的眾伊涌傳達父的浩大——他何等偉大、何等廣闊,又怎樣是無始的、不可容納的、肉眼不可見的。但沉默(Sige)按父的旨意攔阻了他,因為父願意引領他們眾人進入一種思念,渴慕去尋求他們前述的元父。其餘的眾伊涌也照樣,靜靜地以某種方式渴望見那發出他們種子者,並要查考那無始之根。然而那十二元組中末後、最年幼的伊涌,就是由人與教會所發出的那位——即智慧(Sophia)——卻遠遠地搶先衝出,並在沒有她配偶「願者」(Theletos)擁抱的情況下受了一種「情慾/苦情」(passion)。這情慾起初發生在心思與真理周圍的眾伊涌中,卻轉移、傾注到這位走偏的伊涌身上,假託是出於愛,實則出於放肆,因為她不像心思那樣得以與完全的父相交。這情慾乃是對父的尋索;因為照他們所說,她想要把握住他的浩大。後來她無法做到,因她妄圖一件不可能的事,又陷入極大的掙扎之中——既因那深淵的浩大、父的不可測透,又因她對他的眷戀——她不住地向前伸展,終必被他的甘甜所吞沒,溶解於那全體的本質中,若不是她遇見了那位在不可言喻的浩大之外堅固並護衛萬有的能力。這能力他們又稱為界限(Horos);藉著它,她被攔住、得了堅固,好不容易才回轉歸於自己,並確信父是不可測透的,於是放下她先前的意念,連同那從那令人驚駭的詫異中臨到她的情慾,一併放下。
1-1:3
Ἔνιοι δὲ αὐτῶν πῶς τὸ πάθος τῆς Σοφίας καὶ τὴν ἐπιστροφὴν μυθολογοῦσιν· ἀδυνάτῳ καὶ ἀκαταλήπτῳ πράγματι αὐτὴν ἐπιχειρήσασαν τεκεῖν οὐσίαν ἄμορφον, οἵαν φύσιν εἶχε θήλειαν τεκεῖν· ἣν καὶ κατανοήσασαν πρῶτον μὲν λυπηθῆναι, διὰ τὸ ἀτελὲς τῆς γενέσεως, ἔπειτα φοβηθῆναι μηδὲ αὐτὸ τὸ εἶναι τελείως ἔχειν· εἶτα ἐκστῆναι καὶ ἀπορῆσαι, ζητοῦσαν τὴν αἰτίαν, καὶ ὅντινα τρόπον ἀποκρύψει τὸ γεγονός. Ἐγκαταγενομένην δὲ τοῖς πάθεσι λαβεῖν ἐπιστροφὴν, καὶ ἐπὶ τὸν Πατέρα ἀναδραμεῖν πειρασθῆναι, καὶ μέχρι τινὸς τολμήσασαν, ἐξασθενῆσαι, καὶ ἱκέτιν τοῦ πατρὸς γενέσθαι· συνδεηθῆναι δὲ αὐτῇ καὶ τοὺς λοιποὺς Αἰῶνας, μάλιστα δὲ τὸν Νοῦν. Ἐντεῦθεν λέγουσι πρώτην ἀρχὴν ἐσχηκέναι τὴν οὐσίαν, ἐκ τῆς ἀγνοίας, καὶ τῆς λύπης, καὶ τοῦ φόβου, καὶ τῆς ἐκπλήξεως. δὲ Πατὴρ τὸν προειρημένον Ὅρον ἐπὶ τούτοις διὰ τοῦ Μονογενοῦς προβάλλεται ἐν εἰκόνι ἰδίᾳ, ἀσύζυγον, ἀθήλυντον. Τὸν γὰρ Πατέρα ποτὲ μὲν μετὰ συζυγίας τῆς Σιγῆς, ποτὲ δὲ καὶ ὑπέραῤῥεν, καὶ ὑπέρθηλυ εἶναι θέλουσι. Τὸν δὲ Ὅρον τοῦτον καὶ Σολλυτρωτὴν Σταυρὸν καὶ Λυτρωτὴν καὶ Καρπιστὴν, καὶ Ὁροθέτην, καὶ Μεταγωγέα καλοῦσι. Διὰ δὲ τοῦ Ὅρου τούτου φασὶ κεκαθάρθαι καὶ ἐστηρίχθαι.. τὴν Σοφίαν, καὶ ἀποκατασταθῆναι τῇ συζογίᾳ· χωρισθείσης γὰρ τῆς Ἐνθυμήσεως ἀπʼ αὐτῆς σὺν τῷ ἐπιγινομένῳ μένῳ πάθει, αὐτὴν μὲν ἐντὸς πληρώματος εἶναι· μεῖναι· τὴν δὲ ἐνθύμησιν αὐτῆς σὺν τῷ πάθει τοῦ Ὅρου ἀφορισθῆναι καὶ ἀποστερηθῆναι ἀποσταυρωθῆναι, καὶ ἐκτὸς αὐτοῦ γενομένην, εἶναι μὲν πνευματικὴν οὐσίαν, φυσικήν τινα Αἰῶνος ὁρμὴν τυγχάνουσαν· ἄμορφον δὲ καὶ ἀνείδεον διὰ τὸ μηδὲν καταλαβεῖν· καὶ διὰ τοῦτο καρπὸν ἀσθενῆ καὶ θῆλυν αὐτὸν λέγουσι
Some of them, however, mythologize the passion of Sophia and her conversion in this way. Having attempted an impossible and incomprehensible thing, she brought forth a formless substance, of the kind that a female nature is able to bring forth. When she perceived it, she first grieved over the incompleteness of its generation, then feared that even its very existence might not be perfect; then she was beside herself and at a loss, seeking the cause and how she might conceal what had happened. Engulfed in these passions, she took a turning back, and attempted to run up to the Father; and having ventured for a time, she grew faint and became a suppliant of the Father. The rest of the Aeons joined in her entreaty, and especially Nous. From this, they say, substance had its first beginning—out of ignorance and grief and fear and consternation. Then the Father, upon these things, emits the aforesaid Horos through the Only-begotten, in his own image, without consort, without female. For sometimes they will have the Father exist with the consort Sige, and sometimes to be above-male and above-female. This Horos they also call Joint-Redeemer, Cross (Stauros), Redeemer, Emancipator, Limit-setter, and Conductor. By this Horos, they say, Sophia was purified and made firm and restored to her pairing. For when her Enthymesis (Intention) had been separated from her, together with the passion that came upon it, she herself remained within the Pleroma; but her Enthymesis, together with the passion, was set apart and excluded—crucified, as it were—by Horos, and being outside of it she was indeed a spiritual substance, being a kind of natural impulse of an Aeon, but formless and without shape because she had grasped nothing; and for this reason they call her a weak and female fruit.
然而他們中有些人,將智慧(Sophia)的情慾與她的回轉如此編成神話。她既妄圖一件不可能、不可測度的事,便生出一個無形的本質,正是雌性本性所能生出的那種。她一覺察到它,起先為這生育的不完全而憂傷,繼而懼怕連它的存在本身或許也不完全;接著她驚惶失措、徬徨無依,尋索其中緣由,並思想當如何隱藏所發生的事。她既深陷於這些情慾之中,便有了回轉,試圖向父奔上去;她大膽嘗試了一陣,卻力竭了,成了父的懇求者。其餘的眾伊涌也與她一同懇求,尤其是心思(Nous)。他們說,本質的最初起頭就是由此而來——出於無知、憂傷、懼怕與驚惶。於是父因這些事,藉獨生者發出前述的界限(Horos),是按他自己的形像,無配偶、無雌性的。因為他們有時要父與配偶沉默(Sige)同存,有時又要他是超乎雄性、超乎雌性的。這界限,他們又稱為共同救贖者(Joint-Redeemer)、十字架(Stauros)、救贖者、釋放者、定界者,以及引渡者。他們說,藉著這界限,智慧得了潔淨、得了堅固,並被恢復到她的配偶關係中。因為當她的意念(Enthymesis)連同臨到它的情慾一同從她身上被分離出去後,她自己仍留在普累若麻之內;但她的意念連同那情慾,卻被界限分別出去、被排除——彷彿被釘了十字架——既在界限之外,她固然是屬靈的本質,乃是某種伊涌的自然衝動,卻是無形、無相的,因為她一無所獲;為此緣故,他們稱她為一個軟弱而雌性的果子。
1-1:4
Μετὰ δὲ τὸ ἀφορισθῆναι ταύτην ἐκτὸς τοῦ πληρώματος τῶν Αἰώνων, τήν τε Μητέρα αὐτῆς ἀποκατασταθῆναι τῇ ἰδία συζυγία, τὸν Μονογενῆ πάλιν ἑτέραν προβαλέσθαι συζυγίαν κατὰ προμήθειαν τοῦ Πατρὸς, ἴνα μὴ ὁμοίως ταύτῃ πάθῃ τις τῶν Αἰώνων, Χριστὸν καὶ Πιεῦμα ἅγιον εἰς πῆξιν καὶ στηριγμὸν τοῦ Πληρώματος, ὑφʼ ὦν καταρτισθῆναι τοὺς Αἰῶνας. Τὸν μὲν γὰρ Χριστὸν διδάξαι αὐτοὺς συζογίας φύσιν, ἀγεννήτου κατάληψιν γινώσκοντας, ἱκανοὺς εἶναι, ἀναγορεῦσαί τε ἐν αὐτοῖς τὴν τοῦ πατρὸς ἐπίγνωσιν, ὅτι τε ἀχώρητός ἐστι καὶ ἀκατάληπτος, καὶ οὐκ ἔστιν οὔτε ἰδεῖν οὔτε ἀκοῦσαι αὐτόν· διὰ μόνου τοῦ Μονογενοῦς γινώσκεται. Καὶ τὸ μὲν αἴτιον τῆς αἰωνίου διαμονῆς τοῖς λοιποῖς τὸ πρῶτον καταληπτὸν ὑπάρχειν τοῦ Πατρὸς, τῆς δὲ γενέσεως αὐτοῦ καὶ μὲν ἄρτι προβληθεὶς Χριστὸς ἐν αὐτοῖο ἐδημιούργησε. Τὲ δὲ ἓν Πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον ἐξισωθέντας αὐτοὺς πάντας εὐχαριστεῖν ἐδίδαξε, καὶ τὴν ἀληθινὴν ἀνάπαυσιν ἡγήσατο εἰσηγήσατο. Οὕτως τε μορφῇ καὶ γνώμῃ ἴσους κατασταθῆναι τοὺς Αίῶνας λέγουσι, πάντας γενομένους Νόας, καὶ πάντας Λόγους, καὶ πάντας Ἀνθρώπους, καὶ πάντας Χριστούς· καὶ τὰς θηλείας ὁμοίως πάσας Ἀληθείας, καὶ πάσας Ζωὰς, καὶ Πνεύματα, καὶ Ἐκκλησίας. Στηριχθέντα δὲ ἐπὶ τούτῳ τὰ ὅλα, καὶ ἀναπαυσάμενα τελέως, μετὰ μεγάλης χαρᾶς φησιν ὑμνῆσαι τὸν Προπάτορα, πολλῆς εὐφρασίας μετασχόντα. Καὶ ὅπὲρ τῆς εὐποιΐας ταύτης βουλῇ μιᾷ καὶ γνώμῃ τὸ πᾶν Πλήρωμα τῶν Αἰώνων, συνευδοκοῦντος τοῦ Χριστοῦ καὶ τοῦ Πνεύματος, τοῦ δὲ Πατρὸς αὐτῶν συνεπισφραγιζμένου, ἕνα ἕκαστον τῶν Αἰώνων, ὅπερ εἶχεν ἐν ἑαυτῷ κάλλιστον καὶ ἀνθηρότατον συνενεγκαμένους καὶ ἐρανισαμένους, καὶ ταῦτα ἁρμοδίως πλέξαντας, καὶ ἐμμελῶς ἑνώσαντας, προβαλέσθαι προβλήματα εἰς τιμὴν καὶ δόξαν τοῦ Βυθοῦ, τελειότατον κάλλος τε καὶ ἄστρον τοῦ Πληρώματος, τέλειον καρπὸν τὸν Ἰησοῦν, ὃν καὶ Σωτῆρα προσαγορευθῆναι, καὶ Χριστὸν, καὶ Λόγον πατρωνυμικῶς, καὶ κατὰ καὶ τὰ Πάντα, διὰ τὸ ἀπὸ πάντων εἶναι· δορυφόροις τε αὐτῶν αὐτῷ εἰς τιμὴν τὴν αὐτῶν ὁμογενεῖς Ἀγγέλους συμπροβεβλῆσθαι
After she had been set apart outside the Pleroma of the Aeons, and her Mother had been restored to her own pairing, the Only-begotten again, by the forethought of the Father, emitted another pair, Christ and the Holy Spirit, for the consolidating and strengthening of the Pleroma, lest any of the Aeons should suffer as she had; and by these the Aeons were perfected. For Christ taught them the nature of pairing, and that, having come to know the comprehension of the unbegotten, they were sufficient; and he proclaimed among them the knowledge of the Father—that he is uncontainable and incomprehensible, and cannot be seen or heard, but is known only through the Only-begotten. And the cause of eternal continuance for the rest is the first comprehensible aspect of the Father, while the cause of the generation and formation of the Only-begotten is that which is incomprehensible. Christ, just now emitted, wrought this among them. And the one Holy Spirit taught them, now made equal, to give thanks, and introduced the true rest. Thus, they say, the Aeons were established equal in form and disposition, all becoming Minds and all Words and all Men and all Christs; and the females likewise all Truths and all Lives and Spirits and Churches. When the whole had been made firm in this and had rested completely, with great joy, they say, it hymned the Forefather, having partaken of much gladness. And in return for this benefit, by one will and purpose the whole Pleroma of the Aeons, with the consent of Christ and the Spirit, and the Father setting his seal upon it, each one of the Aeons contributing and gathering together whatever was most beautiful and flourishing in himself, and weaving these together fittingly and uniting them harmoniously, put forth an emission to the honor and glory of Bythos—a most perfect beauty and star of the Pleroma, the perfect fruit, Jesus, who was also called Savior, and Christ, and Logos after the name of his fathers, and likewise All Things, because he is from all. And to him as bodyguards, for their own honor, kindred Angels were emitted along with him.
她既被分別出去、置於眾伊涌的普累若麻之外,她的母親也被恢復到自己的配偶關係中,獨生者便照父的先見,再次發出另一對:基督與聖靈,為要鞏固並堅固普累若麻,免得眾伊涌中有任何一位像她那樣受苦;眾伊涌也藉這一對得以成全。因為基督教導他們配偶的本性,又教導他們既已認識對那非受生者的領會,便已足夠;他在他們中間宣告對父的認識——他是不可容納、不可測度的,不能被看見、不能被聽見,惟獨藉獨生者被認識。其餘眾伊涌得以永遠長存的緣由,乃是父那最初可被領會的一面;而獨生者得以受生與成形的緣由,乃是那不可領會的一面。基督既是剛被發出的,便在他們中間成就了這事。那獨一的聖靈,則教導他們——如今已被使為平等——獻上感謝,並引進了真正的安息。如此,他們說,眾伊涌在形態與心志上都被立為平等,個個都成了心思(Nous),個個都成了道,個個都成了人,個個都成了基督;眾雌性的也照樣,個個都成了真理,個個都成了生命、靈與教會。當全體在此根基上被堅固、完全得了安息,他們說,全體便大大歡喜,分享了豐盛的喜樂,向元父歌頌讚美。為報答這恩惠,眾伊涌的全普累若麻便同一心志、同一意念,在基督與聖靈的贊同下,並父在其上加印,眾伊涌各自把自己裡面最美麗、最繁茂的獻上、湊集起來,合宜地編織、和諧地聯合,發出一個「發射」,獻給深淵(Bythos)以為尊榮與榮耀——這是普累若麻最完美的佳麗與明星,是完全的果子,就是耶穌;他又被稱為救主、基督,並照他列祖之名稱為「道」,也照樣稱為「萬有」(All Things),因為他是從萬有而出的。又有與他同類的眾天使,作他的護衛,為他們自己的尊榮,與他一同被發出。
1-1:5
Αὕτη μὲν οὖν ἐστιν ἐντὸς πληρώματος ὑπʼ αὐτῶν λεγομένη πραγματεία, καὶ τοῦ πεπονθότος Αἰῶνος, καὶ μετὰ μικρὸν ἀπολωλότος, ὡς ἐν πολλῇ ὕλῃ διὰ ζήτησιν τοῦ Πατρὸς συμφορὰ, καὶ τοῦ Ὅρου, καὶ Στύλου Σταυροῦ, καὶ Λυτρωτοῦ, καὶ Καρπιστοῦ, καὶ Ὁροθέτου, καὶ Μεταγωγέως ἐξ ἀγῶνος σύμπηξις, καὶ τοῦ πρώτου Χριστοῦ σὺν τῷ Πνεύματι τῷ ἁγίῳ ἐκ μετανοίας ὑπὸ τοῦ Πατρὸς αὐτῶν μεταγενεστέρα τῶν Αἰώνων γένεσις, καὶ τοῦ δευτέρου Χριστοῦ, ὃν καὶ Σωτῆρα λέγουσιν, ἐξ ἐράνου σύνθετος κατασκευή. Ταῦτα δὲ φανερῶς μὲν μὴ εἰρῆσθαι, διὰ τὸ μὴ πάντας χωρεῖν τὴν γνῶσιν, μυστηριωδῶς δὲ ὑπὸ τοῦ Σωτῆρος διὰ παραβολῶν μεμηνύσθαι τοῖς συνιεῖν δυναμένοις οὕτως· τοὺς μὲν γὰρ τριάκοντα Αἰῶνας μεμηνύσθαι διὰ τῶν τριάκοντα ἐτῶν ὡς προέφαμεν, ἐν οἷς οὐδὲν ἐν φανερῷ φάσκουσι πεποιηκέναι τὸν Σωτῆρα, καὶ διὰ τῆς παραβολῆς τῶν ἐργατῶν τοῦ ἀμπελῶνος. Καὶ τὸν Παῦλον φανερώτατα λέγουσι τούσδε Αἰῶνας ὀνομάζειν πολλάκις, ἔτι δὲ καὶ τὴν τάξιν αὐτῶν τετηρηκέναι οὕτως εἰπόντα, εἰς πάσας τὰς γενεὰς τῶν αἰώνων τοῦ αἰῶνος· ἀλλὰ καὶ ἡμᾶς ἐπὶ τῆς εὐχαριστίας λέγοντας, εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων, ἐκείνους τοὺς αἰῶνας σημαίνειν· καὶ ὅπου ἂν αἰὼν αἰῶνες ὀνομάζονται, τὴν ἀναφορὰν εἰς ἐκείνους εἶναι θέλουσι. Τὴν δὲ τῆς δωδεκάδος τῶν Αἰώνων προβολὴν μηνύεσθαι, διὰ τοῦ δωδεκαετῆ ὄντα τὸν Κύριον διαλεχθῆναι τοῖς νομοδιδασκάλοις, καὶ διὰ τῆς τῶν Ἀποστόλων ἐκλογῆς· δώδεκα γὰρ Ἀπόστολοι. Καὶ τοὺς λοιποὺς δεκαοκτὼ Αἰῶνας φανεροῦσθαι, διὰ τοῦ μετὰ τὴν ἐκ νεκρῶν ἀνάστασιν δεκαοκτὼ μησὶ λέγειν διατετριφέναι αὐτὸν σὺν τοῖς μαθηταῖς· ἀλλὰ καὶ διὰ τῶν προηγουμένων τοῦ ὀνόματος αὐτοῦ δύο γραμμάτων, τοῦ τε ἰῶτα καὶ τοῦ ἦτα, τοὺς δεκαοκτὼ Αἰῶνας εὐσήμως μηνύεσθαι. Καὶ τοὺς δέκα Αἰῶνας ὡσαύτως διὰ τοῦ ἰῶτα γράμματος, προηγεῖται τοῦ ὀνόματος αὐτοῦ, σημαίνουσι λέγεσθαι σημαίνεσθαι λέγουσι. καὶ διὰ τοῦτο εἰρηκέναι τὸν Σωτῆρα, ἰῶτα ἓν μία κεραία οὐ μὴ παρέλθῃ ἕως ἂν πάντα γένηται. Τὸ δὲ περὶ τὸν δωδέκατον Αἰῶνα γεγονὸς πάθος ὑποσημαίνεσθαι λέγουσι τῆς ἀποστασίας στασίας διὰ Ἰούδαν, ὃς δωδέκατος ἦν τῶν Ἀποστόλων, γενομένης προδοσίας δείκνυσθαι λέγουσι, καὶ ὅτι τῷ δωδεκάτῳ μηνὶ ἔπαθεν· ἐνιαυτῷ γὰρ ἑνὶ βούλονται αὐτὸν μετὰ τὸ βάπτισμα αὐτοῦ κεκηρυχέναι. Ἔτι τε ἐπὶ τῆς αἱμοῤῥούσης σαφέ- τοῦτο δηλοῦσθαι· δώδεκα γὰρ ἔτη παθοῦσαν αὐτὴν ὑπὸ τῆς τοῦ Σωτῆρος παρουσίας τεθεραπεῦσθαι, ἁψαμένην τοῦ κρασπέδου αὐτοῦ, καὶ διὰ τοῦτο εἰρηκέναι τὸν Σωτῆρα, τίς μου ἥψατο; διδάσκοντα τοὺς μαθητὰς τὸ γεγονὸς ἐν τοῖς αἰῶσι μυστήριον, καὶ τὴν ἴασιν τοῦ πεπονθότος αἰῶνος· γὰρ παθοῦσα δώδεκα ἔτη, ἐκείνη δύναμις, ἐκτεινομένης αὐτῆς, καὶ εἰς ἄπειρον ῥεούσης τῆς οὐσίας, ὡς λέγουσιν, εἰ μὴ ἔψαυσε τοῦ φορήματος αὐτοῦ, τουτέστι τῆς ἀληθείας τῆς πρώτης τετράδος, ἥτις διὰ τοῦ κρασπέδου μεμήνυται, ἀνελύθη ἂν εἰς τὴν οὐσίαν αὐτῆς· ἀλλὰ ἔστη καὶ ἐπαύσατο τοῦ πάθους· γὰρ ἐξελθοῦσα δύναμις τούτου, εἶναι δὲ ταύτης ταύτην τὸν Ὅρον θέλουσιν, ἐθεράπευσεν αὐτὴν, καὶ τὸ πάθος ἐχώρισεν ἀπʼ αὐτῆς. Τὸ δὲ, Σωτῆρα τὸν ἐκ πάντων ὄντα τὸ πᾶν εἶναι, διὰ τοῦ λόγου τοῦ τούτου, πᾶν ἄῤῥεν διανοῖγον μήτραν, δηλοῦσθαι λέγουσιν· ὃς τὸ πᾶι ὢν, διήνοιξε τὴν μήτραν τῆς Ἐνθυμήσεως τοῦ πεπονθότος Αἰῶνος, καὶ ἐξορισθείσης ἐκτὸς τοῦ πληρώματος· ἣν δὴ καὶ δευτέραν ὀγδοάδα καλοῦσι, περὶ ἧς μικρὸν ὕστερον ἐροῦμεν. Καὶ ὁπὸ τοῦ Παύλου δὲ φανερῶς διὰ τοῦτο εἰρῆσθαι λέγουσι· καὶ αὐτός ἐστι τὰ πάντα· καὶ πάλιν, πάντα εἰς αὐτὸν, καὶ ἐξ αὐτοῦ τὰ πάντα· καὶ πάλιν, ἐν αὐτῷ κατοικεῖ πᾶν τὸ πλήρωμα τῆς θεότητος· καὶ τὸ, ἀνακεφαλαιώσασθαι δὲ τὰ πάντα ἐν τῷ Χριστῷ διὰ τοῦ Θεοῦ οὕτως, ἑρμυνεύουσιν εἰρῆσθαι, καὶ εἴ τινα ἄλλα τοιαῦτα
This, then, is what they call the transaction within the Pleroma: the calamity of the Aeon that suffered and was almost lost, as though through much matter, on account of its search for the Father; and the consolidation, out of struggle, of Horos—also called Pillar, Cross, Redeemer, Emancipator, Limit-setter, and Conductor; and the generation, later than the Aeons, of the first Christ together with the Holy Spirit, by their Father out of repentance; and the composite fashioning, out of a common contribution, of the second Christ, whom they also call Savior. These things, they say, were not stated openly, because not all can contain the knowledge, but were indicated in a mysterious way by the Savior through parables to those able to understand, thus: the thirty Aeons were indicated by the thirty years, as we said before, in which they assert the Savior did nothing in public; and by the parable of the laborers of the vineyard. They also say that Paul very plainly names these Aeons often, and even preserves their order, saying thus: 'unto all the generations of the age of the ages'; and that we too, in the Eucharist, when we say 'unto the ages of the ages,' signify those Aeons; and wherever an aeon or aeons are named, they would have the reference be to those. The emission of the Dodecad of the Aeons is indicated, they say, by the Lord's conversing with the teachers of the law when he was twelve years old, and by the choice of the Apostles, for there were twelve Apostles. And the remaining eighteen Aeons are made manifest, they say, by his being said to have stayed with the disciples for eighteen months after the resurrection from the dead; and also by the first two letters of his name, the iota and the eta, the eighteen Aeons are clearly indicated. And the ten Aeons likewise they say are signified by the letter iota, which is the first of his name; and for this reason the Savior said, 'One iota or one tittle shall not pass away until all be fulfilled.' The passion that occurred concerning the twelfth Aeon is hinted at, they say, by the apostasy through Judas, who was twelfth of the Apostles; the betrayal that took place demonstrates it, they say, and that he suffered in the twelfth month; for they hold that he preached for one year after his baptism. Further, this is shown in the woman with the issue of blood: for she suffered twelve years and was healed by the coming of the Savior, having touched the hem of his garment; and for this reason the Savior said, 'Who touched me?'—teaching the disciples the mystery that occurred among the Aeons and the healing of the Aeon that suffered. For the woman who suffered twelve years was that power; as her substance was being stretched out and flowing into the infinite, they say, had she not touched his garment—that is, the Truth of the first Tetrad, indicated by the hem—she would have been dissolved into her substance; but she stopped and ceased from the passion. For the power that went out from him—and this they will have to be Horos—healed her and separated the passion from her. And as for the Savior who, being from all, is the All, this is shown, they say, through the saying, 'Every male that opens the womb'; for he who is the All opened the womb of the Enthymesis of the Aeon that suffered, when it had been exiled outside the Pleroma—which they also call the second Ogdoad, of which we shall speak a little later. And they say this was plainly stated by Paul: 'And he is all things'; and again, 'All things unto him, and of him are all things'; and again, 'In him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead'; and the saying, 'to gather up all things in Christ through God,' they interpret as spoken thus, and any other such passages.
這就是他們所謂普累若麻之內的「交易/經營」:那受苦、幾乎喪亡的伊涌之災禍,彷彿是因尋索父而陷入大量的「質料」之中;以及界限(Horos)——又稱柱子、十字架、救贖者、釋放者、定界者、引渡者——從掙扎中得以鞏固;又有第一基督連同聖靈,由他們的父出於悔改、晚於眾伊涌而被生出;以及第二基督——他們又稱他為救主——出於眾伊涌共同的奉獻而被合成、造就。他們說,這些事並未公開明說,因為並非人人都能容受這知識,乃是由救主藉比喻、以奧祕的方式,向那些能領悟的人指明,如此這般:三十個伊涌乃藉那三十年指明,如前所說,就是他們聲稱救主於明處一無所作的那段時間;又藉葡萄園工人的比喻指明。他們又說,保羅多次極明顯地題到這些伊涌,甚至保留了它們的次序,如此說:「直到那世代之世代的萬代」;又說我們在感恩禮(聖餐)中說「直到萬世之萬世(世世代代)」時,所指的就是那些伊涌;凡題到「世代」或「眾世代」之處,他們都要其所指歸於那些伊涌。他們說,十二元組之眾伊涌的發出,乃藉主十二歲時與律法教師談論一事指明,又藉揀選使徒指明,因為使徒有十二位。其餘的十八個伊涌,他們說,乃藉「他從死裡復活後與門徒同住了十八個月」之說顯明;又藉他名字起首的兩個字母,即 iota(伊歐塔)與 eta(艾塔),清楚指明那十八個伊涌。那十個伊涌,他們同樣說是藉字母 iota 表明的,因 iota 居他名字之首;為此緣故,救主說:「一點一畫(一個 iota)也不能廢去,直到一切都成全。」至於那發生在第十二個伊涌身上的情慾,他們說,乃藉著經由猶大(Judas,他是十二使徒中的第十二位)所行的背道暗示出來;他們說,所發生的出賣顯明了此事,又說他在第十二個月受苦;因為他們認定他受洗後傳道了一年。再者,這也在那患血漏的婦人身上顯明:因她患病十二年,藉救主的降臨得了醫治,乃摸了他衣裳的繸子;為此緣故,救主說:「誰摸我?」——是要教導門徒那發生在眾伊涌中的奧祕,以及那受苦之伊涌得醫治的事。因為那患病十二年的婦人,就是那能力;照他們所說,當她的本質被拉伸、流向無窮之際,她若不曾摸著他的衣裳——即那第一四元組的真理,乃藉繸子所指明——她早已溶解、歸於她的本質了;但她止住了,從那情慾中停下來。因為從他出去的那能力——這能力他們要它就是界限(Horos)——醫治了她,並把情慾從她身上分離出去。至於那位從萬有而出、自身即是「萬有」的救主,他們說,這乃藉「凡頭生的男子,都要開母腹」這句話顯明;因他既是「萬有」,便開了那受苦伊涌之意念(Enthymesis)的母腹——就是那被放逐到普累若麻之外的——他們又稱之為第二八元組,這一點我們稍後再講。他們又說,這也由保羅明明說了出來:「並且他是萬有」;又說:「萬有都歸於他,又本於他」;又說:「神本性一切的豐盛,都有形有體地居住在他裡面」;以及「藉神在基督裡使萬有同歸於一」這句話,他們也如此解釋——還有其他類似的經文。
1-1:6
Ἔπειτα περὶ τοῦ Ὅρου αὐτῶν, ὃν δὴ καὶ πλείοσιν ὀνόμασι καλοῦσι, δύο ἐνεργείας ἔχειν αὐτὸν ἀποφαινόμενοι, τὴν ἑδραστικὴν καὶ τὴν μεριστικήν· καὶ καθὰ μὲν ἑδράζει καὶ στορίζει, Σταυρὸν εἶναι, καθὸ δὲ μερίζει καὶ διορίζει, Ὅρον· τὸν μὲν Σταυρὸν Σωτῆρα οὕτως λέγουσι μεμηνυκέναι τὰς ἐνεργείας αὐτοῦ· καὶ πρῶτον μὲν τὴν ἑδραστικὴν ἐν τῷ εἰπεῖν· ὃς οὐ βαστάζει τὸν σταυρὸν αὐτοῦ, καὶ ἀκολουθεῖ μοι, μαθητὴς ἐμὸς οὐ δύναται γενέσθαι· καὶ ἄρας τὸν σταυρὸν αὐτοῦ, ἀκολουθεῖ μοι· τὴν δὲ διοριστικὴν αὐτοῦ ἐν τῷ εἰπεῖν· οὐκ ἦλθον βαλεῖν εἰρήνην, ἀλλὰ κάχαιραν. Καὶ τὸν Ἰωάννην δὲ λέγουσιν αὐτὸ τοῦτο μεμηνυκέναι, εἰπόντα· τὸ πτύον ἐν τῇ χειρὶ αὐτοῦ, καὶ διακαθαριεῖ τὴν ἅλωνα, καὶ συνάξει τὸν σίτον εἰς τὴν ἀποθήκην αὐτοῦ, τὸ δὲ ἄχυρον κατακαύσει πυρὶ ἀσβέστῳ· καὶ διὰ τούτου τὴν ἐνέργειαν τοῦ Ὅρου μεμηνυκέναι· πτύον γὰρ ἐκεῖνον τὸν Σταυρὸν ἑρμηνεύουσιν εἶναι, ὃν δὴ δεῖ καὶ ἀναλίσκειν τὰ ὑλικὰ πάντα, ὡς ἄχυρα πῦρ· καθαίρειν δὲ τοὺς σωζομένους, ὡς τὸ πτύον τὸν σῖτον. Παῦλον δὲ τὸν Ἀπόστολον καὶ αὐτὸν ἐπιμιμνήσκεσθαι τούτου τοῦ Σταυροῦ λέγουσιν οὕτως· λόγος γὰρ τοῦ σταυροῦ τοῖς μὲν ἀπολλυμένοις μωρία ἐστὶ, τοῖς δὲ σωζομένοις ἡμῖν δύναμις Θεοῦ· καὶ πάλιν· ἐμοὶ δὲ μὴ γένοιτο ἐν μηδενὶ καυχᾶσθαι, εἰ μὴ ἐν τῷ σταυρῷ τοῦ Ἰησοῦ, δἰ οὗ ἐμοὶ κόσμος ἐσταύρωται, κᾀγὼ τῷ κόσμῳ. Τοιαῦτα μὲν οὖν περὶ τοῦ πληρώματος αὐτῶν, καὶ τοῦ πλάσματος πάντες τοῦ πάντος λέγουσιν, ὲφαρμόζειν βιαζόμενοι τὰ καλῶς εἰρυμένα τοῖς κακῶς ἐπινενουμένοις ὑπʼ αὐτῶν· καὶ οὐ μόνον ἐκ τῶν εὐαγγελικῶν καὶ τῶν ἀποστολικῶν πειρῶνται τὰς ἀποδείξεις ποιεῖσθαι, παρατρέποντες τὰς ἑρμηνείας, καὶ ῥᾳδιουργοῦντες τὰς ἐξηγήσεις· ἀλλὰ, καὶ ἐκ νόμου καὶ προφητῶν, ἅτε πολλῶν παραβολῶν καὶ ἀλληγοριῶν εἰρημένων, καὶ εἰς πολλὰ ἕλκειν δυναμένων τὸ ἀμφίβολον διὰ τῆς ἐξηγήσεως, ἕτεροι δὲ δεινῶς, δεινοτέρως τῷ πλάσματι αὐτῶν καὶ δολίως ἐφαρμόζοντες, αἰχμαλωτίζουσιν ἀπὸ τῆς ἀληθείας τοὺς μὴ ἑδραίαν τὴν πίστιν εἰς ἕνα Θεὸν πατέρα παντοκράτορα, καὶ εἰς ἕνα κύριον Ἰησοῦν Χριστὸν τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ Θεοῦ διαφυλάσσοντας
Then, concerning their Horos, whom indeed they call by many names, they declare that he has two operations, the establishing and the dividing; and insofar as he establishes and makes firm, he is Cross, but insofar as he divides and separates, he is Horos (Limit). The Savior, they say, indicated his operations thus: first the establishing one, in saying, 'Whoever does not bear his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple,' and 'Taking up his cross, he follows me'; and the dividing one, in saying, 'I came not to bring peace but a sword.' John too, they say, indicated this very thing in saying, 'The winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will thoroughly cleanse his threshing floor and gather the wheat into his barn, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire'; and by this he indicated the operation of Horos. For they interpret that winnowing fork to be the Cross, which indeed must consume all material things, as fire consumes chaff, but cleanse those who are saved, as the winnowing fork cleanses the wheat. And the Apostle Paul too, they say, makes mention of this Cross, thus: 'For the word of the cross is to those who perish foolishness, but to us who are saved the power of God'; and again, 'But far be it from me to glory in anything except in the cross of Jesus, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world.' Such, then, are the things they say concerning their Pleroma and the fashioning of the universe, forcibly fitting what was rightly said to what they have wickedly devised. And not only from the Gospel and apostolic writings do they attempt to make their proofs, perverting the interpretations and falsifying the expositions, but also from the Law and the Prophets, inasmuch as many parables and allegories have been spoken, capable of being dragged into many meanings through their ambiguity by exposition; and others, terribly—nay, more terribly—and deceitfully fitting these to their fabrication, lead captive away from the truth those who do not keep firm their faith in one God the Father Almighty and in one Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God.
其次,論到他們的界限(Horos)——他們確實以許多名稱稱呼他——他們宣稱他有兩種運作:一是「奠立」,一是「劃分」;就他奠立並使之堅固而言,他是十字架,就他劃分並分隔而言,他是界限。他們說,救主如此指明了他的這兩種運作:首先是那奠立的運作,乃在他說「凡不背著自己的十字架跟從我的,不能作我的門徒」,以及「他背起自己的十字架,跟從我」;其次是那劃分的運作,乃在他說「我來並不是叫地上太平,乃是叫地上動刀兵」。他們說,約翰(John)也指明了同一件事,乃在他說:「他手裡拿著簸箕,要揚淨他的場,把麥子收在倉裡,把糠用不滅的火燒盡」;他藉此指明了界限的運作。因為他們把那簸箕解釋為十字架,這十字架的確必要消滅一切屬物質的,如同火燒糠秕一般,卻潔淨那些得救的人,如同簸箕揚淨麥子一般。他們說,使徒保羅也題到這十字架,如此說:「因為十字架的道理,在那滅亡的人為愚拙,在我們得救的人卻為神的大能」;又說:「但我斷不以別的誇口,只誇我們主耶穌基督的十字架;因這十字架,就我而論,世界已經釘在十字架上;就世界而論,我已經釘在十字架上。」這就是他們論到自己的普累若麻以及宇宙之構成所說的話,他們勉強地把那本是美善的言語,硬套在自己惡意所臆想的事上。他們不單試圖從福音書與使徒的著作中作出他們的證明——曲解其釋義、竄改其詮釋——也從律法與先知書中如此行;因其中說了許多比喻與寓意,藉著詮釋的模稜兩可,可被牽強附會到許多意思上。還有些人更可怕——竟以更可怕、更詭詐的方式,把這些套在自己的虛構上,把那些信心不堅、不持守「信獨一全能之父神,並信獨一之主、神的兒子耶穌基督」的人,從真理那裡擄掠了去。
1-1:7
Τὰ δὲ ἐκτὸς τοῦ πληρώματος λεγόμενα ὑπ αὐτῶν ἐστι τοιαῦτα· τὴν Ἐνθύμησιν τῆς ἄνω Σοφίας, ἣν καὶ καλοῦσιν, ἀφορισθεῖσαν τοῦ ἄνω πληρώματος σὺν τῷ πάθει λέγουσιν, ἐν σκιαῖς καὶ σκηνώματος κενώματος τόποις ἐκβεβράσθαι κατὰ ἀνάγκην. Ἔξω γὰρ φωτὸς ἐγένετο καὶ Πληρώματος, ἄμορφος καὶ ἀνείδεος, ὥσπερ ἔκτρωμα, διὰ τὸ μηδὲν κατειληφέναι· οἰκτείραντά τε αὐτὴν τὸν ἄνω Χριστὸν, καὶ διὰ τοῦ Σταυροῦ ἐπεκταθέντα, τῇ ἰδία δυνάμει μορφῶσαι μόρφωσιν τὴν κατʼ οὐσίαν μόνον, ἀλλʼ οὐ τὴν κατὰ γνῶσιν· καὶ πράξαντα τοῦτο ἀναδραμεῖν συστείλαντα αὐτοῦ τὴν δύναμιν, καὶ καταλιπεῖν, ὅπως αἰσθομένη τοῦ περὶ αὐτὴν πάθους διὰ τὴν ἀπαλλαγὴν τοῦ Πληρώματος, ὀρεχθῇ τῶν διαφερόντων, ἔχουσά τινα ὀδμὴν ἀφθαρσίας, ἐγκαταλειφθεῖσαν αὐτὴν αὐτῇ ὑπὸ τοῦ Χριστοῦ καὶ τοῦ ἁγίου Πνεύατος. Διὸ καὶ αὐτὴν τοῖς ἀμφοτέροις ὀνόμασι καλεῖσθαι, τε πατρωνυμικῶς, ( γὰρ πατὴρ αὐτῆς Σοφία κληΐζεται), καὶ πνεῦμα ἅγιον ἀπὸ τοῦ περὶ τὸν Χριστὸν πνεύματος. Μορφωθεῖσάν τε αὐτὴν, καὶ ἔμφρονα γενηθεῖσαν, παραυτίκα δὲ κενωθεῖσαν ἀοράτου αὐτῇ συνόντος Λόγου, τουτέστι τοῦ Χριστοῦ, ἐπὶ ζήτησιν ὁρμῆσαι τοῦ καταλιπόντος αὐτὴν φωτὸς καὶ μὴ δυνηθῆναι καταλαβεῖν αὐτὸ, διὰ τὸ κωλυθῆναι ὑπὸ τοῦ Ὅρου. Καὶ ἐνταῦθα τὸν Ὅρον κωλύοντα αὐτὴν τῆς εἰς τοὔμπροσθεν ὁρμῆς εἰπεῖν Ἰαώ· ὅθεν τὰ Ἰαὼ ὄνομα γεγενῆσθαι φάσκουσι. Μὴ δονηθείσαν δὲ διοδεῦσαι τὸν Ὅρον, διὰ τὸ συμπεπλέχθαι τῷ πάθει, καὶ μόνην ἀπολειφθεῖσαν ἔξω, παντὶ μέρει τοῦ πάθους ὑποπεσεῖν πολυμεροῦς καὶ πολυποικίλου ὑπάρχοντος, καὶ παθεῖν, λύπην μὲν, ὅτι οὐ κατέλαβε· φόβον δὲ, μὴ καθάπερ αὐτὴν τὸ φῶς, οὕτω καὶ τὸ ζῇν ἐπιλίπῃ· ἀπορίαν τε ἐπὶ τούτοις· ἐν ἀγνοία δὲ τὰ πάντα. Καὶ οὐ καθάπερ μήτηρ αὐτῆς, πρώτη Σοφία καὶ Αἰὼν, ἑτεροίωσιν ἐν τοῖς πάθεσιν εἶχεν, ἀλλὰ ἐναντιότητα. Ἐπισυμβεβηκέναι δʼ αὐτῇ καὶ ἑτέραν διάθεσιν, τὴν τῆς ἐπιστροφῆς ἐπὶ τόν ζωοποιήσαντα. Ταύτην σύστασιν καὶ οὐσίαν τῆς ὕλης γεγενῆσθαι λέγουσιν, ἐξ ἧς ὅδε κόσμος συνέστηκεν. Ἐκ μὲν γὰρ τῆς ἐπιστροφῆς τὴν τοῦ κόσμου καὶ τοῦ δημιουργοῦ πᾶσαν ψυχὴν τὴν γένεσιν εἰληφέναι, ἐκ δὲ τοῦ φόβου καὶ τῆς λύπης τὰ λοιπὰ τὴν ἀρχὴν ἐσχηκέναι· ἀπὸ γὰρ τῶν δακρύων αὐτῆς γεγονέναι πᾶσαν ἔνυγρον οὐσίαν· ἀπὸ δὲ τοῦ γέλωτος, τὴν φωτεινήν· ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς λύπης καὶ τῆς ἐκπλήξεως, τὰ σωματικὰ τοῦ κόσμου στοιχεῖα. Ποτὲ μὲν γὰρ ἔκλαιε καὶ ἐλυπεῖτο, ὡς λέγουσι, διὰ τὸ καταλελείφθαι μόνην ἐν τῷ σκότει καὶ τῷ κενώματι· ποτὲ δὲ εἰς ἔννοιαν ἥκουσα τοῦ καταλιπόντος αὐτὴν φωτὸς, διεχεῖτο καὶ ἐγέλα· ποτὲδ αὖ πάλιν ἐφοβεῖτο· ἄλλοτε δὲ διηπόρει, καὶ ἐξίστατο
The things they say concerning what is outside the Pleroma are of this kind. The Enthymesis (Intention) of the higher Sophia, which they also call (Achamoth), having been set apart from the upper Pleroma together with the passion, they say was cast out by necessity into places of shadow and emptiness. For she came to be outside the light and the Pleroma, formless and shapeless, like an abortion, because she had grasped nothing. The Christ above took pity on her and, having been extended through the Cross, by his own power gave her a forming—a forming according to substance only, but not according to knowledge; and having done this he ran back, withdrawing his power, and left her, so that, perceiving the passion that was about her on account of her separation from the Pleroma, she might long for the better things, having some fragrance of incorruptibility left to her by the Christ and the Holy Spirit. For this reason she too is called by both names—by the name of her father (for her father is called Sophia), and 'Holy Spirit' from the Spirit about Christ. Having been formed and made intelligent, but immediately emptied of the invisible Logos that had been with her—that is, of Christ—she set out in search of the light that had left her, and was unable to grasp it, because she was hindered by Horos. And here, they say, Horos, in hindering her from her forward impulse, said 'Iao'; whence, they assert, the name 'Iao' came to be. Unable to pass through Horos because she was entangled with the passion, and being left alone outside, she fell prey to every part of the passion, which is manifold and many-formed, and suffered: grief, that she had not grasped it; fear, lest, as the light had failed her, so life too might fail; and perplexity besides these; and all in ignorance. And not as her mother, the first Sophia and Aeon, did she have an alteration in her passions, but a contrariety. There also befell her another disposition, that of conversion toward the one who had given her life. They say this became the constitution and substance of matter, out of which this world is composed. For out of the conversion the whole soul of the world and of the Demiurge took its generation; and out of the fear and the grief the rest took their beginning. For from her tears came every watery substance; from her laughter, the luminous; and from her grief and consternation, the bodily elements of the world. For at one time she would weep and grieve, as they say, because she had been left alone in the darkness and the emptiness; at another, coming to a thought of the light that had left her, she would be diffused and laugh; and at another again she would fear; and at other times she would be at a loss and beside herself.
他們論到普累若麻之外的事,乃是如下這般。那高層智慧(Sophia)的意念(Enthymesis)——他們又稱她為(亞迦摩,Achamoth)——既連同那情慾從上層普累若麻被分別出去,他們說,她便被迫拋擲到陰影與虛空之地。因為她落在光與普累若麻之外,無形無相,如同一個流產的胎兒,因她一無所獲。上層的基督憐憫她,便藉十字架伸展出去,以他自己的能力給了她一種成形——僅是按本質的成形,而非按知識的成形;他既行了這事,便退回去,收回自己的能力,將她撇下,好叫她因與普累若麻分離而覺察自己所受的情慾,便渴慕那更美的事物,因她裡面還留有基督與聖靈所遺下的一點不朽的馨香。為此緣故,她也以這兩個名稱被稱呼——以她父之名(因她的父名叫智慧),又因那圍繞基督的靈而被稱為「聖靈」。她既被成形、有了悟性,卻立即因那曾與她同在的不可見之道(Logos)——即基督——離去而被倒空,便起身去尋索那離開她的光,卻無法把握住它,因她被界限(Horos)攔阻了。他們說,這時界限在攔阻她向前的衝動時,說了「Iao(雅歐)」;他們聲稱「Iao」這名字便由此而來。她既因與情慾糾纏而無法穿過界限,被獨自撇在外面,便落入那情慾的各個部分之下——那情慾是多種多樣、形態各異的——於是她受了苦:憂傷,因她未能把握住;懼怕,惟恐如光離開她那樣,生命也離她而去;此外還有徬徨無依;而這一切都在無知之中。她不像她的母親——那第一智慧與伊涌——在情慾中只是有所「變異」,她乃是有了「相反對立」。又有另一種心境臨到她,就是向那賜她生命者「回轉」的心境。他們說,這就成了「質料」(matter)的構成與本質,這世界即由此質料而組成。因為從那「回轉」,世界與造物主(Demiurge)的全部魂便得了它的源頭;而從那懼怕與憂傷,其餘的便得了起頭。因為從她的眼淚,生出一切屬水的本質;從她的歡笑,生出那發光的;從她的憂傷與驚惶,生出世界中屬物質的元素。因為照他們所說,她有時哭泣憂傷,因被獨自撇在黑暗與虛空之中;有時想起那離開她的光,便舒展開來而歡笑;有時又再懼怕;又有時徬徨失措、驚惶失常。
1-1:8
Καὶ τί γάρ τραγῳδία πολλὴ λοιπὸν ἦν ἐνθάδε, καὶ φαντασία ἑνὸς ἑκάστου αὐτῶν, ἄλλως καὶ ἄλλως ἐκδιηγουμένου ἐκ ποταποῦ πάθους, ἐκ ποίου στοιχείου οὐσία τὴν γένεσιν εἴληφεν·ἃ καὶ εἰκότως δοκοῦσί μοι μὴ ἅπαντας θέλειν ἐν φανερῷ διδάσκειν, ἀλλʼ μόνους ἐκείνους τοὺς καὶ μεγάλους μισθοὺς ὑπὲρ τηλικούτων μυστηρίων τελεῖν δυναμένους. Οὐκέτι γὰρ ταῦτα ὅμοια ἐκείνοις, περὶ ὧν Κύριος ὑμῶν εἴρηκε, δωρεὰν ἐλάβετε, δωρεὰν δότε ἀλλὰ ἀνακεχωρηκότα, καὶ τερατώδη καὶ βαθέα μυστήρια μετὰ πολλοῦ καμάτου περιγινόμενα τοῖς φιλοψευδέσι. Τίς γὰρ οὐκ ἂν ἐκδαπανήσειε πάντα τὰ ὑπάρχοντα αὐτοῦ, ἵνα μάθῃ, ὅτι ἀπὸ τῶν δακρύων τῆε Ἐνθυμήσεως τοῦ πεπονθότος Αἰῶνος, θάλασσαι, καὶ πηγαὶ, καὶ ποταμοὶ, καὶ πᾶσα ἔνυδρος οὐσία τὴν γένεσιν εἴληφεν, ἐς δὲ τοῦ γέλωτος αὐτῆς τὸ φῶς, καὶ ἐκ τῆς ἐκπλήξεως καὶ τῆς ἀμηχανίας τὰ σωματικὰ τοῦ κόσμου στοιχεῖα; Βούλομαι δὲ καὶ αὐτὸς συνεισενεγκεῖν τι τῇ καρποφορία αὐτῶν. Ἐπαιδὴ γὰρ ὁρῶ τὰ μὲν γλυκέα ὕδατα ὄντα, οἶον πηγὰς, καὶ ποταμοὺς, καὶ ὄμβρους, καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα· τὰ δὲ ἐπὶ ταῖς θαλάσσαις ἁλμυρά· ἐπινοῶ μὴ πάντα ἀπὸ τῶν δακρύων αὐτῆς προβεβλῆσθαι, διότι τὸ δάκρυον ἁλμυρὸν τῇ ποιότητι ὑπάρχει· φανερὸν οὖν, ὅτι τὰ ἁλμυρὰ ὕδατα ταῦτά ἐστι τὰ ἀπὸ τῶν δακρύων. Εἰκὸς δὲ αὐτὴν ἐν ἀγωνίᾳ πολλῇ καὶ ἀμηχανίᾳ γεγονυῖαν καὶ ἱδρωκέναι· ἐντεῦθεν δὴ κατὰ τὴν ὑπόθεσιν αὐτῶν ὑπολαμβάνειν δεῖ, πηγὰς καὶ ποταμοὺς, καὶ εἴ τινα ἄλλα γλυκέα ὕδατα ὑπάρχει τὴν γένεσιν μὴ μετεσχ. ἐσχοκέναι ἀπὸ τῶν δακρύων ἱδρώτων αὐτῆς· ἀπίθανον γὰρ, μιᾶς ποιότητος οὔσης τῶν δακρύων, τὰ μὲν ἁλμυρὰ, τὰ δὲ γλυκέα ὕδατα ἐξ αὐτῶν προελθεῖν· τοῦτο δὲ πιθανώτερον, τὰ μὲν εἶναι ἀπὸ τῶν δακρύων, τὰ δὲ ἀπὸ τῶν ἱδρώτων. Ἐπαιδὴ καὶ θερμὰ καὶ δριμέα τινὰ ὕδατά ἐστιν ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ, νοεῖν ὀφείλεις, τὶ ποιήσασα, καὶ ἐκ ποίου μορίου προήκατο ταῦτα· ἁρμόζουσι γὰρ τοιοῦτοι καρποὶ τῇ ὑποθέσει αὐτῶν. Διοδεύσασαν οὖν πᾶν πάθος τὴν Μητέρα αὐτῶν, καὶ μόγις ὑπερκύψασαν, ἐπὶ ἱκεσίαν τραπῆναι τοῦ καταλιπόντος αὐτὴν φωτὸς, τουτέστι τοῦ Χριστοῦ, λέγουσιν· ὃς ἀνελθὼν μὲν εἰς τὸ πλήρωμα, αὐτὸς μὲν εἰκὸς ὅτι ὤκνησεν ἐκ δευτέρου κατελθεῖν, τὸν Παράκλητον δὲ ἐξέπεμψεν εἰς αὐτὴν, τουτέστι τὸν σωτῆρα, ἐνδόντος αὐτῷ πᾶσαν τὴν δύναμιν τοῦ πατρὸς, καὶ πᾶν ὑπ ἐξουσίαν παραδόντος, καὶ τῶν αἰώνων δεόμενος δὲ ὁμοίως, ὅπως ἐν αὐτῷ τὰ πάντα κτισθῇ τὰ ὁρατὰ καὶ τὰ ἀόρατα, Θρόνοι, θεότητες, κυριότητες· ἐκπέμπεται δὲ πρὸς αὐτὴν μετὰ τῶν ἡλικιωτῶν αὐτοῦ τῶν Ἀγγέλων. Τὴν δὲ Ἀχαμὼθ ἐντραπεῖσαν αὐτὸν λέγουσι πρῶτον μὲν ἐπιθέσθαι δἰ αἰδῶ, μετέπειτα δὲ ἰδοῦσαν αὐτὸν σὺν ὅλῃ τῇ καρποφορίᾳ αὐτοῦ, προσδραμεῖν αὐτῷ, δύναμιν λαβοῦσαν ἐκ τῆς ἐπιφανείας αὐτοῦ· κᾀκεῖνον μορφῶσαι αὐτὴν μόρξωσιν τὴν κατὰ γνῶσιν, καὶ ἴασιν τῶν παθῶν ποιήσασθαι αὐτῆς· χωρίσαντα δʼ αὐτὰ αὐτῆς, μὴ ἀμελήσαντα δὲ αὐτῶν, οὐ γὰρ ἦν δονατὰ ἀφανισθῆναι, ὡς τὰ τῆς προτέρας, διὰ τὸ ἑκτικὰ ἤδη καὶ δυνατὰ εἶναι· ἀλλʼ ἀποκρίναντα χωρήσει τοῦ χωρὶς, εἶτα συγχέαι καὶ πῆξαι, καὶ ἐξ ἀσωμάτου πάθους εἰς ἀσώματον τὴν ὕλην μεταβαλεῖν αὐτά· εἶθʼ οὕτως ἐπιτηδειότητα καὶ φύσιν ἐμπεποιηκέναι αὐτοῖς, ὥστε εἰς συγκρίματα καὶ σώματα ἐλθεῖν, πρὸς τὸ γενέσθαι δύο οὐσίας, τὴν φαύλην τῶν παθῶν, τήν τε τῆς ἐπιστροφῆς ἐμπαθῆ· καὶ διὰ τοῦτο δυνάμει τὸν Σωτῆρα δεδημιουργηκέναι φάσκουσι. Τήν τε Ἀχαμὼθ ἐκτὸς πάθους γενομένην, καὶ συλλαβοῦσαν τῇ χαρ τῶν ἐν αὐτῷ φώτων τὴν θεωρίαν, τουτέστι τῶν Ἀγγέλων τῶν μετʼ αὐτοῦ, καὶ ἐγκισσήσασαν αὐτοὺς, κεκυηκέναι καρποὺς κατὰ τὴν εἰκόνα διδάσκουσι, κύημα πνευματικὸν καθʼ ὁμοίωσιν γεγονότως γεγονὸς τῶν δορυφόρων τοῦ Σωτῆρος
And what a great tragedy there was, after all, in this place, and the fanciful imagining of each one of them, expounding now this way and now that from what kind of passion and out of what element substance took its generation! These things seem to me, with good reason, not to be things they wish to teach all openly, but only those able to pay great fees for such great mysteries. For these are no longer like those of which our Lord said, 'Freely you have received, freely give,' but recondite and monstrous and profound mysteries, obtained with much labor by lovers of falsehood. For who would not spend all his possessions in order to learn that from the tears of the Enthymesis of the Aeon that suffered, seas and springs and rivers and every watery substance took their generation; from her laughter, the light; and from her consternation and helplessness, the bodily elements of the world? I wish, indeed, myself to contribute something to their fruit-bearing. Since I see that some waters are sweet, such as springs and rivers and showers and the like, but those in the seas are salt, I conceive that not all were emitted from her tears, since a tear is salt in quality; it is plain, then, that the salt waters are those from the tears. But it is likely that she, having come to be in much anguish and helplessness, also sweated; and hence, according to their hypothesis, we must suppose that springs and rivers and whatever other sweet waters exist took their generation from her sweat, not from her tears. For it is improbable, since the tears are of one quality, that both salt and sweet waters should proceed from them; this is more plausible, that some are from the tears and others from the sweat. And since there are also certain hot and acrid waters in the world, you ought to consider what she did, and from what part she emitted these; for such fruits suit their hypothesis. Having passed through every passion, then, and barely emerged, their Mother, they say, turned to supplication of the light that had left her—that is, of Christ. He, having ascended into the Pleroma, himself probably shrank from descending a second time, but sent forth to her the Paraclete—that is, the Savior—the Father having yielded to him all his power and handed over all things under his authority, and the Aeons likewise, so that in him all things might be created, visible and invisible, thrones, deities, dominions. He is sent forth to her with his contemporaries, the Angels. Achamoth, they say, abashed before him, at first out of modesty put on a veil; but afterward, seeing him with all his fruit-bearing, ran to him, receiving power from his appearing; and he gave her a forming—the forming according to knowledge—and effected a healing of her passions. Having separated these passions from her, yet not neglecting them—for they could not be made to vanish, like those of the former one, because they were now habitual and powerful—but having set them apart by separation, he then mingled and consolidated them, and changed them from incorporeal passion into the incorporeal substance of matter; and thus he wrought in them a fitness and nature such that they could come into combinations and bodies, so as to become two substances: the evil one of the passions, and the impassioned one of the conversion. And for this reason they assert that the Savior virtually became a Creator. And Achamoth, having come to be outside passion, and having conceived with joy the contemplation of the lights within him—that is, of the Angels who were with him—and having become pregnant by them, brought forth fruits after the image, they teach—a spiritual offspring formed after the likeness of the bodyguards of the Savior.
說到底,此處竟有何等大的悲劇場面,又有他們各人何等的幻想——一會兒這樣、一會兒那樣地講解:本質是出於哪一種情慾、出於哪一種元素而得了生成!這些事,在我看來不無道理,乃是他們不願公開教給眾人的,只教給那些能為如此重大的奧祕付出鉅額費用的人。因為這些已不再像我們的主所說的那些事:「你們白白地得來,也要白白地捨去」,乃是隱晦、怪誕而幽深的奧祕,是那些好謊言的人費了許多力氣才獲得的。因為,誰不願傾盡自己一切所有,去學得這事:海、泉、河,以及一切屬水的本質,都是從那受苦伊涌之意念(Enthymesis)的眼淚生成的;光是從她的歡笑生成的;而世界屬物質的元素,是從她的驚惶與無助生成的呢?其實我自己也願為他們的「結果子」貢獻一點。既然我看見有些水是甘甜的,如泉、河、雨水之類,而海裡的水卻是鹹的,我便推想,並非一切都是從她的眼淚發出的,因為眼淚的性質是鹹的;那麼,顯然鹹水才是從眼淚來的。但她既陷入極大的焦慮與無助,多半也出了汗;因此,照他們的假設,我們必須推想:泉、河,以及一切其他甘甜的水,乃是從她的汗、而非從她的眼淚生成的。因為眼淚既是同一性質,要說鹹水與甜水都從其中發出,是不合情理的;倒不如說有些出於眼淚、有些出於汗水,更為合理。又因世上還有某些溫熱、辛辣的水,你就當思想她做了什麼、從哪一部位排出了這些;因為這樣的果子才配得上他們的假設。他們說,他們的母親既經歷了一切情慾,好不容易才探出頭來,便轉而懇求那離開她的光——即基督。基督既已升入普累若麻,他自己多半不願再下來第二次,便差遣保惠師(Paraclete)——即救主——到她那裡去;父已將自己一切的能力讓與他,把萬有都交在他的權柄之下,眾伊涌也照樣,好叫萬有都在他裡面被造,無論是可見的、不可見的,有位的、神聖的、主治的。他便與他同輩的眾天使一同被差到她那裡。他們說,亞迦摩(Achamoth)在他面前羞怯,起初出於矜持便蒙上了帕子;後來見他帶著一切的果子,便跑向他,從他的顯現得了能力;他便給她一種成形——就是按知識的成形——並使她的諸情慾得了醫治。他將這些情慾從她身上分離出去,卻沒有忽略它們——因為它們不能像前一位的情慾那樣被消滅,因它們如今已成了固定而有力的——乃是藉分離把它們分別出來,然後加以混合、鞏固,把它們從無形的情慾轉變為質料那無形的本質;如此,他在它們裡面造成一種適性與本性,使它們得以進入結合與形體,以致生成兩種本質:一是諸情慾那邪惡的本質,一是那回轉所成、帶情慾的本質。為此緣故,他們聲稱救主實際上成了一位造作者。他們又教導說,亞迦摩既已出於情慾之外,又歡喜地懷上了對他裡面諸光——即與他同在的眾天使——的「觀想」,因他們受了孕,便照那形像生出果子來,乃是一個屬靈的後裔,是按救主之護衛者的樣式而成的。
next part →
ch. 1-2 →
1-11-21-31-41-51-71-81-91-111-121-131-141-161-201-211-221-241-251-261-281-381-401-462-12-2