📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original
♥ Support

← All books · Latin Fathers › Letters & Polemics (CSEL)

Letters & Polemics (CSEL) 26 part 1/3

Latin original · 38 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 26:1–26:38 (77 verses in all)

← ch. 25ch. 27 →
next part →
ℹ️ This corpus has no morphological tagging. Glosses are matched by word form against a dictionary — a match does not prove it is the same word (an inflected form can coincide with another word’s lemma). Verify against the original and a specialist lexicon where precision matters.
ℹ️ The Chinese and English alongside are this site's own translation, made directly from the original text on this page (not the CUV or the WEB, which follow the Masoretic Text and a different textual tradition).
26:1
DE BEATA VITA. Si ad philosophiae portum, e quo iam in beatae uitae regionem solumque proceditur, uir humanissime atque magne Theodore, ratione institutus cursus et uoluntas ipsa perduceret, nescio, utrum temere dixerim multo minoris numeri homines ad eum peruenturos fuisse, quamuis nunc quoque, ut uidemus, rari admodum paucique perueniant.
ON THE HAPPY LIFE. If reason well ordered, and the will itself, could bring one to the harbour of philosophy — from which one now advances into the region and land of the happy life — I know not, most humane and great Theodorus, whether I should be rash to say that far fewer men would come to attain it; though even now, as we see, exceedingly few and rare do attain it.
《論幸福生活》。至高尊貴而偉大的提奧多魯斯(Theodorus)啊,倘若循理而行的正途與意志本身,能將人引到哲學的港口——人正是從那裡進入幸福生活的境域與陸地——我不知我這樣說是否過於冒失:即抵達那境地的人數會少得多;儘管即便如今,正如我們所見,能抵達的也是寥寥無幾、極其稀少。
26:2
cum enim in hunc mundum siue deus siue natura siue necessitas siue uoluntas nostra siue coniuncta horum aliqua siue simul omnia — res enim multum obscura est, sed tamen a te iam inlustranda suscepta — uelut in quoddam procellosum salum nos quasi temere passimque proiecerit, quotusquisque cognosceret, quo sibi nitendum esset quaue redeundum, nisi aliquando et inuitos contraque obnitentes aliqua tempestas, quae stultis uidetur aduersa, in optatissimam terram nescientes errantesque conpingeret? Igitur hominum, quos philosophia potest accipere, tria quasi nauigantium genera mihi uideor uidere.
For since — whether it be God, or nature, or necessity, or our own will, or some combination of these, or all of them together (for the matter is very obscure, though you have already undertaken to shed light on it) — has cast us into this world as it were rashly and at random, into a kind of stormy sea, how few would recognize whither they ought to strive or by what way to return, unless some tempest — which to the foolish seems adverse — should, even against their will and their struggling resistance, dash them, unknowing and wandering, upon the most longed-for land? Therefore of men whom philosophy is able to receive I seem to see, as it were, three kinds of voyagers.
因為既然——無論是上帝,或本性,或必然,或我們自己的意志,或這些的某種結合,或這一切同時——彷彿魯莽而漫無目的地把我們拋入這世界(因為這事甚為隱晦,儘管你已著手要加以闡明),如同拋入某片風暴洶湧的大海,那麼若非有時竟有某場風暴——在愚人看來是逆境的——甚至違背眾人的意願、逆著他們的抗拒,把他們這些茫然迷失的人衝擊到那最為渴慕的陸地上,又有幾人能認出自己當往何處奮力、當由何路歸回呢?因此,論到哲學所能接納的人,我彷彿看見航海者有三類。
26:3
unum est eorum, quos ubi aetas compos rationis adsumpserit, paruo impetu pulsuque remorum de proximo fugiunt seseque condunt in illa tranquillitate, unde ceteris ciuibus, quibus possunt, quo admoniti conentur ad se, lucidissimum signum sui alicuius operis erigunt. alterum uero est eorum superiorique contrarium, qui fallacissima facie maris decepti elegerunt in medium progredi longeque a sua patria peregrinari aude-ut et eius saepe obliuiscuntur. hos si nescio quo et nimis latente modo a puppi uentus, quem prosperum putant, fuerit prosecutus, penetrant in altissima miseriarum elati atque gaudentes, quod eis usque quaque fallacissima serenitas uolup! atum honorumque blanditur.
One is that of those who, when an age capable of reason has come upon them, flee from near at hand with a small effort and stroke of the oars, and hide themselves away in that tranquillity, whence they raise up for their fellow citizens — for those whom they can — a most luminous sign of some work of theirs, that thus admonished they may strive toward it. The other is that of those who are the opposite of the former: deceived by the sea's most treacherous face, they have chosen to advance into the midst and to journey far from their homeland, and they often forget it. If a wind from the stern — which they think favourable — should, in some hidden way, follow after these, they penetrate, elated and rejoicing, into the deepest miseries, because everywhere a most deceitful calm flatters them with pleasures and honours.
第一類是這樣的人:當一個能運用理性的年紀臨到他們時,他們便用槳輕輕一划、稍加用力,就從近處逃離,將自己藏入那寧靜之中;他們從那裡為同胞——為他們所能及的人——豎立起自己某項作為的極明亮的標記,好叫眾人受此提醒而向之奮力。另一類則與前者相反:他們被大海最詭詐的面容所騙,選擇駛入海中央、遠離故土漂泊,且常常忘卻故鄉。倘若有一陣他們自以為順風的風,以某種隱秘的方式從船尾追隨這些人,他們便得意歡欣地深陷於最深的苦難之中,因為那極其詭詐的風平浪靜處處以享樂與尊榮向他們獻媚。
26:4
his profecto quid aliud optandum e; t quam quaedam in illis rebus, a quibus laeti excipiuntur, inprospera et, si parum est, saeuiens omnino tempestas contrarieque flans uentus, qui eos ad certa et solida gaudia uel flentes gementesque perducat ? huius generis tamen plerique nondum longius euagati quibusdam non- ita grauibus molestiis reducuntur. hi sunt homines, quos cum uel lacrimabiles tragoediae fortunarum suarum uel inanium negotiorum anxiae difficultates quasi nihil aliud habentes, quod agant, in libros doctorum sapientissimorumque hominum truserint, in ipso quodam modo portu euigilant, unde illos nulla maris illius promissa nimium falso ridentis excludant.
For these, surely, what else is to be wished than a certain unprosperousness in those very things by which they are joyfully received, and — if that is too little — an altogether raging tempest and a contrary wind blowing against them, which may lead them, even weeping and groaning, to sure and solid joys? Yet the greater part of this kind, having not yet strayed too far, are brought back by certain not-so-grievous troubles. These are men whom, when either the lamentable tragedies of their fortunes, or the anxious difficulties of empty affairs, have thrust — as though having nothing else to do — into the books of learned and most wise men, awaken as it were in the very harbour, from which no promises of that sea, laughing with all too false a smile, can shut them out.
對這等人而言,還有什麼比這更可祈願的呢:即在那些歡然接納他們的事物中出現某種不順;而若這還不夠,便來一場全然狂暴的風暴、一陣逆吹的風,好叫他們縱使哭泣哀號,也被引向那確實而堅固的喜樂?然而這一類人當中大多數尚未漂泊太遠,便被某些並非那麼沉重的困擾帶了回來。這些人乃是這樣的:當他們自身命運的可悲慘劇,或無謂事務的焦慮難題,彷彿逼得他們無事可做,把他們推入博學而至智之人的書卷中時,他們便彷彿在那港口之中醒了過來,而那片以極虛假之笑譏笑的大海,再無任何應許能將他們拒於港外。
26:5
est autem genus inter haec tertium eorum, qui uel in ipso adulescentiae limine uel iam diu multumque iactati tamen quaedam signa respiciunt et suae dulcissimae patriae quamuis in ipsis fluctibus recordantur et aut recto cursu in nullo falsi et nihil morati eam repetunt aut plerumque uel inter nubila deuiantes uel mergentia contuentes sidera uel nonnullis inlecebris capti bonae nauigationis tempora differentes errant diutius, saepe etiam periclitantur. quos item saepe nonnulla in fluxis fortunis calamitas, quasi conatibus eorum aduersa tempestas, in optatissimam uitam quietamque compellit.
But among these there is a third kind: those who, whether at the very threshold of youth, or after being long and greatly tossed about, nevertheless look back upon certain signs, and remember their most sweet homeland even amid the very waves; and either by a straight course, deceived in nothing and delaying at nothing, they make for it again, or — very often — either straying amid the clouds, or gazing at sinking stars, or captivated by certain allurements, deferring the seasons of a good voyage, they wander longer, and often are even endangered. These too, often, some calamity amid their flowing fortunes — as a tempest adverse to their efforts — drives into the most longed-for and peaceful life.
但在這些人當中還有第三類:他們或是在青春的門檻之際,或是在久經而屢遭顛簸之後,仍然回望某些標記,甚至在波濤之中仍記念他們至甜美的故土;他們或是循直路,毫不受騙、毫不延宕地重回故鄉,或是——常常如此——或在雲霧中迷航,或凝望著沉落的星辰,或被某些誘惑所擄,延誤了順利航行的時機,以致漂泊更久,且往往陷於危險。這等人也常有某種災禍臨到他們易逝的境遇之中,如同與他們的努力相逆的風暴,把他們驅入那最為渴慕而寧靜的生活。
26:6
His autem omnibus, qui quocumque modo ad beatae uitae regionem feruntur, unus inmanissimus mons ante ipsum portum constitutus, quo etiam magnas ingredientibus gignit angustias, uehementissime formidandus cautissimeque uitandus est. nam ita fulget, ita mentiente illa luce uestitur, ut non solum peruenientibus nondumque ingressis incolendum se offerat et eorum uoluntati pro ipsa beata terra satisfacturum polliceatur sed plerumque de ipso portu ad sese homines inuitet, eosque nonnumquam detinet ipsa altitudine delectatos, unde ceteros despicere libeat.
But for all these, who in whatever way are borne toward the region of the happy life, there is one most monstrous mountain, set before the very harbour, which even for those entering causes great straits, and is to be most vehemently feared and most warily avoided. For it so gleams, it is so clothed in that lying light, that not only does it offer itself to be dwelt in by those arriving and not yet entered, and promises to satisfy their will in place of that happy land itself, but it often invites men to itself from the very harbour, and sometimes detains them, delighted by its very height, from which they take pleasure in looking down upon the rest.
但對所有這些以各樣方式被帶向幸福生活境域的人而言,有一座最為可怕的高山,聳立在那港口之前,甚至使那些正在進港的人陷入極大的險隘之中,是當極力懼怕、最為謹慎躲避的。因為它是這般地閃耀、這般地披著那虛謊的光,以致它不僅向那些抵達卻尚未進港的人展現自己可供居住,並應許要代替那幸福之地本身來滿足他們的意願,甚至常常從那港口本身把人招引到它那裡,有時還把人扣留在那裡,使人陶醉於它的高處,樂於從那裡俯視其餘的人。
26:7
hi tamen admonent saepe uenientes, ne aut occultis subter scopulis decipiantur aut ad se ascendere facile putent, et qua sine periculo ingrediantur propter illius terrae uicinitatem, beniuolentissime docent. ita cum eis inuident uanissimam gloriam, locum securitatis ostendunt. nam quem montem alium uult intellegi ratio propinquantibus ad philosophiam ingressisue metuendum nisi superbum studium inanissimae gloriae, quod ita nihil intus plenum atque solidum habet, ut inflatos sibi superambulantes subcrepante fragili solo demergat ac sorbeat eisque in tenebras reuolutis eripiat luculentam domum, quam paene iam uiderant?
These, however, often warn those coming, lest they be deceived by hidden reefs beneath, or think it easy to ascend to themselves; and they most kindly teach by what way, on account of the nearness of that land, one may enter without danger. Thus, while they envy men that most empty glory, they point out the place of security. For what other mountain does reason mean to be feared by those drawing near to philosophy, or having entered it, than the proud pursuit of that emptiest glory — which has within it nothing full and solid, so that, with its frail soil crumbling beneath, it sinks and swallows those puffed up and walking upon it, and, when they have been rolled back into the darkness, snatches from them the shining home which they had almost already beheld?
然而這等人常常警告前來的人,免得他們被水下隱藏的暗礁所騙,或以為攀登到他們那裡是容易的;他們也極其善意地指教人,因那陸地相近,該由何路可無危險地進港。這樣,他們一面嫉羨人得那最虛空的榮耀,一面卻指出那安穩之處。因為理性所指、要那些近前哲學或已入其中之人所懼怕的,除了那對至虛空之榮耀的驕傲追逐,還能是哪座山呢?這追逐內裡毫無充實堅固之物,以致當它腳下脆弱的土地崩塌時,便把那些自高自大、行在其上的人下沉並吞沒,並且當他們被翻捲回黑暗之中時,奪去他們那幾乎已經望見的光明之家。
26:8
Quae cum ita sint, accipe, mi Theodore — namque ad id, quod desidero, te unum intueor teque aptissimum semper: admiror — accipe, inquam, et quod illorum trium genus hominum me tibi dederit et quo loco mihi esse uidear et abs te cuius modi auxilium certus expectem. ego ab usque undeuicensimo anno aetatis meae, postquam in schola rhetoris librum illum Ciceronis, qui Hortensius uocatur, accepi, tanto amore philosophiae succensus sum, ut statim ad eam me ferre meditarer. sed neque mihi nebulae defuerunt, quibus confunderetur cursus meus, et diu, fateor, quibus in errorem ducerer, labentia in Oceanum astra suspexi.
Since these things are so, receive, my Theodorus — for toward that which I desire I look to you alone, and I ever admire you as the fittest — receive, I say, both an account of which of those three kinds of men has given me to you, and of what place I seem to myself to be in, and of what kind of help I confidently expect from you. From the nineteenth year of my age, after in the school of rhetoric I received that book of Cicero which is called Hortensius, I was so kindled with love of philosophy that I meditated at once betaking myself to it. But neither did the mists fail me by which my course was confounded, and long, I confess, I gazed up at the stars gliding down into the Ocean, by which I was led into error.
既然這些事是如此,我的提奧多魯斯啊,請你領受——因為對於我所渴慕的事,我唯獨仰望你,並始終欽佩你為最合適的人——我說,請領受這番敘述:即那三類人中是哪一類把我交到你手中,以及我自覺身處何等境地,又我確信從你那裡所期待的是何種幫助。從我十九歲那年起,在修辭學校裡我讀到西塞羅那本名為《霍爾滕西烏斯》(Hortensius)的書之後,我便被對哲學之愛燃燒得如此熾烈,以致立時思量要奔向它。但那使我航程混亂的迷霧並未離我而去;我坦承,我久久仰望著那些滑落入大洋的星辰,因它們我被引入歧途。
26:9
nam et superstitio quaedam puerilis me ab ipsa inquisitione terrebat et, ubi factus erectior illam caliginem dispuli mihique persuasi docentibus potius quam iubentibus esse cedendum, incidi in homines, quibus lux ista, quae oculis cernitur, inter summe diuina colenda uideretur. non adsentiebar sed putabam eos magnum aliquid tegere illis inuolucris, quod essent aliquando aperturi. at ubi discussos eos euasi maxime traiecto isto mari, diu gubernacula mea repugnantia omnibus uentis in mediis fluctibus Academici tenuerunt. deinde ueni in has terras; hic septentrionem cui me crederem didici.
For a certain childish superstition frightened me away from the very inquiry; and when, having grown more upright, I had dispelled that gloom and persuaded myself that I ought to yield to teachers rather than to those who merely command, I fell in with men to whom this light which is discerned by the eyes seemed among the things supremely divine and to be worshipped. I did not assent, but I supposed they were concealing some great thing within those wrappings, which they would sometime disclose. But when, having examined them, I escaped them — especially after this sea was crossed — for a long while the tenets of the Academics held my rudder, resisting all winds, amid the waves. Then I came into these lands; here I learned the north star to which I might entrust myself.
因為某種孩童般的迷信把我從這探究本身嚇退;而當我變得較為挺立、驅散了那陰霾,並說服自己當服從施教者而非僅發號施令者時,我卻遇上了一些人,在他們看來,這用肉眼所見的光乃屬至高神聖、當受敬拜之列。我並不贊同,卻猜想他們在那些包裹之下藏著某種大事,是他們有朝一日要揭示的。但當我審察他們並脫離他們之後——尤其在渡過這片海之後——學園派的主張久久掌著我的舵,在波濤之中抵擋著一切的風。隨後我來到這片土地;在此我認識了那可將自己交託的北極星。
26:10
animaduerti enim et saepe in sacerdotis nostri et aliquando in sermonibus tuis, cum de deo cogitaretur, nihil omnino corporis esse cogitandum, neque cum de anima; nam id est unum in rebus proximum deo. sed ne in philosophiae gremium celeriter aduolarem, fateor, uxoris honorisque inlecebra detinebar, ut, cum haec essem consecutus, tum demum me, quod paucis felicissimis licuit, totis uelis, omnibus remis in illum sinum raperem ibique conquiescerem.
For I observed, often in the discourses of our priest and sometimes in yours, that when God was being thought of, nothing whatsoever of body was to be conceived, nor when the soul was thought of; for that is the one thing nearest to God among all things. But that I might not swiftly fly into the bosom of philosophy, I confess I was held back by the allurement of a wife and of honour, so that, when I had attained these, then at last I might, as few most happy men have been permitted, sweep myself with all sails and all oars into that bay, and there find rest.
因為我察覺——常在我們司鐸的講論中,有時也在你的言談中——凡思想上帝時,絲毫不可設想有形之物,思想靈魂時亦然;因為在萬物之中,靈魂乃是最接近上帝的那一者。但為使我不至於迅速飛入哲學的懷抱,我坦承,我被妻室與尊榮的誘惑所牽絆,好叫我在得著這些之後,才終於能像少數最幸福之人所蒙允許的那樣,張滿風帆、划盡雙槳,奮然衝入那海灣,並在那裡安歇。
26:11
lectis autem Plotini paucissimis libris, cuius te esse studiosissimum accepi, conlataque cum eis, quantum potui, etiam illorum auctoritate, qui diuina mysteria tradiderunt, sic exarsi, ut omnes illas uellem ancoras rumpere, nisi me nonnullorum hominum existimatio commoueret. quid ergo restabat aliud, nisi ut inmoranti mihi superfluis tempestas, quae putatur aduersa, succurreret? itaque tantum me arripuit pectoris dolor, ut illius professionis onus sustinere non ualens, qua mihi uelificabam fortasse ad Sirenas, abicerem omnia et optatae tranquillitati uel quassatam nauem fessamque perducerem. Ergo uides, in qua philosophia quasi in portu nauigem. sed etiam ipse late patet;
But when I had read a very few books of Plotinus, of whom I have learned you are a most devoted student, and had compared them, as far as I could, with the authority also of those who handed down the divine mysteries, I was so set aflame that I wished to break all those anchors, had not the esteem of certain men swayed me. What then remained but that a tempest, thought adverse, should come to my aid as I lingered over superfluous things? And so such a pain of the chest seized me that, unable to bear the burden of that profession by which I was making sail perhaps toward the Sirens, I cast away all things and steered my ship, battered and weary as it was, into the longed-for tranquillity. You see, then, in what philosophy I now sail as in a harbour. But this too lies open wide;
但當我讀了普羅提諾(Plotinus)極少數的幾卷書——我聽說你是他最熱誠的門生——並盡我所能將它們與那些傳遞神聖奧秘之人的權威相對照時,我便被點燃得如此熾烈,以致我想斬斷那一切的錨鏈,若不是某些人的評議使我動搖的話。那麼還剩下什麼呢?無非是一場被認為是逆境的風暴,在我耽留於無謂之事時前來相助。於是一陣胸痛如此攫住了我,以致我無力承擔那也許正把我駛向塞壬(Sirens)的職業之重擔,便拋棄一切,將我那雖飽受顛簸、疲憊不堪的船隻,駛入我所渴慕的寧靜。這樣你便看見,我如今是在何等的哲學中如在港口般航行。但這港口也是遼闊敞開的;
26:12
eius magnitudo quamuis iam minus periculosum non tamen penitus excludit errorem. nam cui parti terrae, quae profecto una beata est, me admoueam eamque contingam, prorsus ignoro. quid enim solidum tenui, cui adhuc de anima quaestio nutat et fluctuat? quare obsecro te per uirtutem tuam, per humanitatem, per animarum inter se uinculum atque conmercium, ut dexteram porrigas, hoc autem est, ut me ames et a me uicissim te amari credas carumque haberi. quod si inpetrauero, ad ipsam beatam uitam, cui te iam haerere praesumo, paruo conatu facillime accedam.
its vastness, though now less perilous, does not yet wholly exclude error. For to which part of the land — which, assuredly, is the one that is happy — I should draw near and touch, I am utterly ignorant. For what solid thing have I grasped, while the question of the soul still wavers and tosses within me? Wherefore I beseech you, by your virtue, by your humanity, by the bond and commerce of souls with one another, that you stretch out your right hand — that is, that you love me and believe yourself in turn to be loved by me and held dear. And if I obtain this, I shall most easily, with a small effort, draw near to the happy life itself, to which I presume you already cleave.
這港口之浩瀚,雖如今危險已較少,卻仍未全然排除迷失。因為我當駛近並觸及那陸地的哪一部分——那部分無疑正是幸福的——我全然不知。因為當靈魂的問題在我心中仍搖擺翻騰之際,我又抓住了什麼堅實之物呢?因此我懇求你,憑你的德行、你的仁厚、憑靈魂彼此之間的聯繫與往來,求你伸出你的右手——這就是說,求你愛我,並相信你自己反過來也為我所愛、為我所珍視。倘若我得著這個,我便能極輕易地,只需稍加努力,就親近那幸福生活本身——我料想你已然與之相連。
26:13
quid autem agam quoue modo ad istum portum necessarios meos congregem ut cognoscas et ex eo animum meum — neque enim alia signa inuenio, quibus me ostendam — plenius intellegas, disputationum mearum quod mihi uidetur religiosius euasisse atque tuo titulo dignius, ad te scribendum putaui et ipso tuo nomine dedicandum. aptissime sane; nam de beata uita quaesiuimus inter nos nihilque aliud uideo, quod magis dei donum uocandum sit. eloquentia tua territus non sum. quidquid enim amo, quamuis non adsequar, timere non possum; fortunae uero sublimitatem multo minus. apud te enim uere, quamuis sit magna. secunda est; nam quibus dominatur, eosdem ipsos secundos facit.
But that you may know what I am doing and by what means I gather my dear ones toward that harbour, and thereby more fully understand my mind — for I find no other signs by which to reveal myself — I thought I ought to write to you, and to dedicate under your name, that one of my disputations which seems to me to have turned out more devout and more worthy of your title. Most fittingly, indeed; for concerning the happy life we inquired among ourselves, and I see nothing else that is more to be called a gift of God. Your eloquence has not terrified me. For whatever I love, though I attain it not, I cannot fear; and the loftiness of fortune far less. For with you, though it be great, it is truly of secondary rank; for those over whom it holds sway it makes themselves secondary.
但為使你知道我在做什麼、又以何法把我親愛的人聚向那港口,並藉此更充分地了解我的心思——因為我找不到別的標記來顯明自己——我想我當寫信給你,並將我那場在我看來結果較為虔敬、更配得上你名銜的辯論,題獻在你的名下。這確是最恰當的;因為我們彼此所探討的正是幸福生活,而我看不出還有什麼更當被稱為上帝恩賜的了。你的口才並未使我畏懼。因為凡我所愛的,縱使我未能企及,我也無法懼怕;至於命運的崇高,就更不足懼了。因為在你身上,命運縱使偉大,卻真正居於次位;因為它所轄制的人,它反使他們自身淪為次要。
26:14
sed iam quid adferam, quaeso adtende. Idibus Nouembribus mihi natalis dies erat. post tam tenue prandium, ut ab eo nihil ingeniorum inpediretur, omnes, qui simul non modo illo die sed cottidie conuiuabamur, in balneas ad consedendum uocaui; nam is tempori aptus locus secretus occurrerat. erant autem — non enim uereor eos singulari benignitati tuae notos interim nominibus facere — in primis nostra mater, cuius meriti credo esse omne, quod uiuo, Nauigius frater meus, Trygetius et Licentius ciues et discipuli mei; nec Lartidianum et Rusticum consobrinos meos, quamuis nullum uel grammaticum passi sint. deesse uolui ipsumque eorum sensum communem ad rem, quam moliebar, necessarium putaui.
But now, I beg you, attend to what I bring forward. On the Ides of November was my birthday. After a meal so light that from it nothing of our faculties might be hindered, I called all who were dining together with me — not only on that day but daily — to sit down in the baths; for that secret place, suited to the occasion, presented itself. There were present — for I am not afraid to make known to your singular kindness by name, for the moment, those who took part — first of all our mother, to whose merit I believe belongs all that I live; my brother Navigius; Trygetius and Licentius, my fellow townsmen and pupils; nor did I wish Lartidianus and Rusticus, my cousins, to be absent, though they had suffered not even a grammarian to instruct them; and I judged their very common sense necessary for the matter I was attempting.
但如今,我求你,留意我所要陳述的事。十一月的望日是我的生辰。在一頓極其清淡、以致絲毫不至妨礙我們才思的餐食之後,我召集了所有與我一同用餐的人——不僅那一天,也是天天如此——請他們到浴室坐下;因為那隱密之處恰宜於此事,正好呈現在眼前。在座的有——我不怕暫且將參與者的名字告知你那非凡的仁慈——首先是我們的母親,我所活的一切,我相信都歸功於她的功德;還有我的兄弟拿維吉烏斯(Navigius);特呂革提烏斯(Trygetius)與利肯提烏斯(Licentius),是我的同鄉兼門生;我也不願我的表兄弟拉爾提狄亞努斯(Lartidianus)與魯斯提庫斯(Rusticus)缺席,雖然他們連文法教師都未曾受教;而我認為他們那份常人的見識,對我所著手的事是不可或缺的。
26:15
erat etiam nobiscum aetate minimus omnium, sed cuius ingenium. si amore non fallor, magnum quiddam pollicetur, Adeodatus filius meus. quibus adtentis sic coepi. Manifestum uobis uidetur ex anima et corpore nos esse compositos? — Cum omnes consentirent. Nauigius se ignorare respondit. — Cui ego: Nihilne omnino scis, inquam, an inter aliqua, quae ignoras, etiam hoc numerandum est ? — Non puto me, inquit, omnia nescire. — Potesne nobis dicere aliquid eorum, quae nosti ? — Possum, inquit. — Nisi molestum est, inquam, profer aliquid. — Et cum dubitaret: Scisne, inquam, saltem te uiuere? — Scio, inquit. — Scis ergo habere te uitam, si quidem uiuere nemo nisi uita potest. — Et hoc, inquit, scio.
There was also with us the youngest of all in age, but whose talent, if love does not deceive me, promises something great — my son Adeodatus. With these attentive, I thus began. 'Does it seem manifest to you that we are composed of soul and body?' — When all agreed, Navigius answered that he did not know. — To him I said: 'Do you know nothing at all, or is this too to be counted among the things you do not know?' — 'I do not think,' he said, 'that I am ignorant of everything.' — 'Can you tell us something of the things you do know?' — 'I can,' he said. — 'If it is not troublesome,' I said, 'bring forth something.' — And when he hesitated: 'Do you know at least,' I said, 'that you are alive?' — 'I know it,' he said. — 'You know, then, that you have life, since indeed no one can live except by life.' — 'This too,' he said, 'I know.'
與我們同在的還有年紀最幼的一位——若非愛使我看錯,他的天資應許著某種偉大——就是我的兒子阿德奧達圖斯(Adeodatus)。在眾人專注之際,我便如此開始:「你們是否覺得我們由靈魂與身體所組成是顯而易見的?」——當眾人都表示贊同時,拿維吉烏斯回答說他不知道。——我對他說:「你是全然一無所知呢,還是這事也當算在你所不知的事之列?」——他說:「我不認為自己一無所知。」——「你能否告訴我們一些你所知道的事?」——他說:「我能。」——我說:「若不麻煩,請說出一點來。」——當他遲疑時,我說:「你至少知道你是活著的吧?」——他說:「我知道。」——「那麼你知道你擁有生命,因為的確除非藉著生命,無人能活。」——他說:「這個我也知道。」
26:16
— Scis etiam corpus te habere? — Adsentiebatur. — Ergo iam scis te constare ex corpore et uita. — Scio interim, sed utrum haec sola sint incertus sum. — Ergo duo ista, inquam, esse non dubitas, corpus et animam, sed incertus es, utrum sit aliud, quod ad conplendum ac perficiendum hominem ualet. — Ita, inquit. — Hoc quale sit, alias, si possumus, quaeremus, inquam. nunc illud iam ex omnibus quaero, cum fateamur cuncti neque sine corpore neque sine anima esse posse hominem, cibos propter quid horum appetamus.
— 'Do you also know that you have a body?' — He assented. — 'Then you already know that you consist of body and life.' — 'I know it for now, but whether these are the only two, I am uncertain.' — 'Then you do not doubt,' I said, 'that these two exist, body and soul, but you are uncertain whether there is something else which avails to complete and perfect the man.' — 'Just so,' he said. — 'Of what sort this may be, we will inquire another time, if we can,' I said. 'Now I ask this of you all: since we all confess that a man can exist neither without body nor without soul, on account of which of these do we seek food?'
——「你是否也知道你擁有身體?」——他表示同意。——「那麼你已經知道你是由身體與生命所構成的。」——「這個我暫且知道,但這兩者是否就是全部,我還不確定。」——我說:「那麼你並不懷疑這兩樣——身體與靈魂——是存在的,只是你不確定是否還有別的東西,足以使人完整、成全。」——他說:「正是如此。」——我說:「這東西究竟是什麼,倘若我們能夠,改日再探究吧。如今我要問你們眾人這件事:既然我們都承認人既不能沒有身體、也不能沒有靈魂而存在,那麼我們是為了這兩者中的哪一個而追求食物呢?」
26:17
- Propter corpus, inquit Licentius.— Ceteri autem cunctabantur uarioque sermone inter se agebant, quomodo possit propter corpus cibus necessarius uideri, cum appeteretur propter uitam et uita non nisi ad animam pertineret. — Tum ego: Uidetur, inquam. uobis ad eam partem cibum pertinere, quam cibo crescere robustioremque fieri uidemus ? —Adsentiebanturapraeter Trygetium. ait enim: Cur ego non pro edacitate mea creui? — Modum, inquam, suum a natura constitutum habent omnia corpora, ultra quam mensuram progredi nequeant. tamen ea mensura minora essent, si eis alimenta defuissent; quod et in pecoribus facilius animaduertimus et nemo dubitat cibis subtractis omnium animantium corpora macescere.
— 'For the sake of the body,' said Licentius. — But the others hesitated and debated among themselves in various talk, how food could seem necessary for the sake of the body, when it was sought for the sake of life, and life pertained to nothing but the soul. — Then I: 'It seems to you,' I said, 'that food pertains to that part which we see grow and become stronger by food?' — They assented, except Trygetius; for he said, 'Why then have I not grown in proportion to my gluttony?' — 'All bodies,' I said, 'have their measure fixed by nature, beyond which limit they cannot advance. Yet they would be smaller than that measure if food had been lacking to them; which we observe more easily in cattle, and no one doubts that, when food is withdrawn, the bodies of all living things waste away.'
——利肯提烏斯說:「為了身體。」——但其餘的人卻遲疑,彼此以各樣言談爭論:食物既是為生命之故而被追求,而生命又只關乎靈魂,那麼食物怎能顯得是為身體之故所必需的呢。——於是我說:「你們是否覺得,食物關乎的乃是我們所見那藉食物而生長、變得更強壯的那一部分?」——他們都表示同意,惟獨特呂革提烏斯例外;因為他說:「那我為何沒有按著我的貪食比例長大呢?」——我說:「一切身體都有其被本性所定的限度,過了那限度便不能再增長。然而若缺乏食物,它們便會比那限度更小;這在牲畜身上我們更容易察覺,而且無人懷疑:食物一旦被撤去,一切活物的身體便會消瘦。」
26:18
— Macescere, inquit Licentius, non decrescere. — Satis est mihi, inquam, ad id quod uolo. etenim quaestio est, utrum ad corpus cibus pertineat. pertinet autem, cum eo subducto ad maciem deducitur. — Omnes ita esse censuerunt. Quid ergo anima? inquam; nullane habet alimenta propria? an eius esca scientia uobis uidetur? — Plane, inquit mater, nulla re alia credo ali animam quam intellectu rerum atque scientia. — De qua sententia cum Trygetius dubium se ostenderet: Hodie, inquit illa. tu ipse nonne docuisti, unde aut ubi anima pascatur?
— 'They waste away,' said Licentius, 'they do not shrink.' — 'It is enough for me,' I said, 'for what I want. For the question is whether food pertains to the body. And it does pertain, since when it is withdrawn the body is brought to emaciation.' — All judged that it was so. 'What then of the soul?' I said; 'has it no proper nourishment? Or does its food seem to you to be knowledge?' — 'Plainly,' said mother, 'I believe the soul is nourished by nothing else than the understanding of things and knowledge.' — When Trygetius showed himself doubtful of this opinion: 'Today,' she said, 'did you not yourself teach whence and where the soul is fed?'
——利肯提烏斯說:「它們是消瘦,而非縮小。」——我說:「這對我所要說的已經夠了。因為問題在於食物是否關乎身體。而它確實關乎身體,因為食物一旦被撤去,身體便陷於瘦弱。」——眾人都判定情形是如此。我說:「那麼靈魂又如何呢?它豈沒有本身的養料?抑或你們覺得它的食物就是知識?」——母親說:「明明白白地,我相信靈魂所賴以滋養的,無非是對事物的理解與知識。」——當特呂革提烏斯對這見解表示疑惑時,她說:「今天你自己不是教導過,靈魂是從何處、在何處得食的嗎?」
26:19
nam post aliquantam prandii partem te dixisti aduertisse, quo uasculo uteremur, quod alia nescio qua cogitasses, nec tamen ab ipsa ciborum parte abstinueras manus atque morsus. ubi igitur erat animus tuus, quo tempore illud te uescente non adtendebat? inde, mihi crede, et talibus epulis animus pascitur, id est curis et cogitationibus suis, si per eas aliquid percipere possit. — De qua re cum dubitanter streperent: Nonne, inquam, conceditis hominum doctissimorum animos multo esse quam inperitorum quasi in suo genere pleniores atque maiores ? — Manifestum esse dixerunt.
'For after a certain part of the meal you said you had noticed what little dish we were using, because you had been thinking of some other thing I know not what, and yet you had not kept your hands and your bites from the very food. Where then was your mind, at the time when, while you were eating that, it was not attending to it? Thence, believe me, and by such fare the mind is fed — that is, by its cares and its own thoughts, if through them it can perceive anything.' — When they murmured doubtfully about this matter: 'Do you not grant,' I said, 'that the minds of the most learned men are much fuller and greater, as it were in their own kind, than those of the untaught?' — They said it was manifest.
「因為在餐食進行到某一段時,你說你注意到了我們所用的是哪個小碟子,因為你當時正想著別的某事,我也不知是什麼,然而你的手與你的咀嚼卻並未從那食物上停下來。那麼在你吃著那食物、心思卻沒有留意它的時候,你的心思究竟在哪裡呢?相信我,正是由此、正是藉這樣的飲食,心思得著滋養——就是藉它的憂思與它自己的意念,倘若它藉這些能領會些什麼的話。」——當眾人對這事狐疑地喧嚷時,我說:「你們豈不承認,最有學問之人的心思,在其自身的類別中,遠比未受教之人的心思更為充實、更為宏大嗎?」——他們說這是顯而易見的。
26:20
— Recte igitur dicimus eorum animos, qui nullis disciplinis eruditi sunt nihilque bonarum artium hauserunt, ieiunos et quasi famelicos esse. — Plenos, inquit Trygetius, et illorum animos esse arbitror, sed uitiis atque nequitia. — Ista ipsa est, inquam, mihi crede, quaedam sterilitas et quasi fames animorum. nam quem ad modum corpus detracto cibo plerumque morbis atque scabie repletur, quae in eo uitia indicant famem, ita et illorum animi pleni sunt morbis, quibus sua ieiunia confitentur. etenim ipsam nequitiam matrem omnium uitiorum ex eo, quod nequicquam sit, id est ex eo, quod nihil sit, ueteres dictam esse uoluerunt. cui uitio quae contraria uirtus est, frugalitas nominatur.
— 'Rightly, then, do we say that the minds of those who have been instructed in no disciplines and have imbibed nothing of the good arts are fasting and, as it were, famished.' — 'Full,' said Trygetius, 'I judge that their minds too are full, but of vices and wickedness.' — 'That very thing,' I said, 'believe me, is a kind of barrenness and, as it were, a famine of minds. For just as the body, when food is withdrawn, is for the most part filled with diseases and scurf, which vices in it indicate hunger, so also the minds of those men are full of diseases, by which they confess their fastings. For indeed the ancients meant that wickedness itself — the mother of all vices — was so called from the fact that it is worth nothing (nequicquam), that is, from the fact that it is nothing. The virtue contrary to this vice is named frugality.'
——「那麼我們說得對:那些未受任何學科訓練、絲毫未汲取良善學藝之人的心思,乃是禁食的、彷彿飢餓的。」——特呂革提烏斯說:「我倒判定他們的心思也是充實的,只是充滿了惡行與敗壞。」——我說:「相信我,那正是心思的某種貧瘠、彷彿一種飢荒。因為正如身體在食物被撤去時,大抵充滿疾病與痂疥,這些疾患在其上正指明飢餓,照樣,那些人的心思也充滿疾病,藉這些疾病他們坦承自己的禁食。的確,古人有意將那作為萬惡之母的敗壞(nequitia)如此稱呼,乃是因它一無價值(nequicquam),也就是因它一無所是。與此惡行相對的德行,名為節儉(frugalitas)。」
26:21
ut igitur haec a fruge, id est a fructu propter quandam animorum fecunditatem, ita illa ab sterilitate, hoc est a nihilo nequitia nominata est; nihil est enim omne, quod fluit, quod soluitur, quod liquescit et quasi semper perit. ideo tales homines etiam perditos dicimus. est autem aliquid, si manet, si constat, Si semper tale est, ut est uirtus. huius magna pars est atque pulcherrima, quae temperantia et fru«-alitas dicitur. sed si hoc obscurum est. quam ut id iam uos uidere possitis, certe illud conceditis, quia, si animi inperitorum etiam ipsi pleni sunt, ut corporum, ita animorum duo alimentorum genera inueniuntur, unum salubre atque utile, alterum morbidum atque pestiferum.
'As therefore this virtue is named from fruge, that is, from fruit, on account of a certain fruitfulness of minds, so that vice is named from barrenness, that is, from nothing — nequitia; for everything that flows, that dissolves, that melts and as it were perpetually perishes, is nothing. Therefore we call such men also 'lost' (perditos). But that is something, if it remains, if it stands firm, if it is always such — as virtue is. A great and most beautiful part of it is what is called temperance and frugality. But if this is too obscure for you to be able to see it now, at least you grant this: that if the minds of the untaught too are full, then, as of bodies, so of minds two kinds of nourishment are found — one wholesome and useful, the other diseased and pestilent.'
「因此,正如這德行是由 fruge、即由果子(fructus)得名,乃因心思有某種豐產,照樣,那惡行是由貧瘠、即由虛無得名——nequitia;因為凡流動的、消散的、融化的、彷彿永遠敗壞的,都是虛無。所以我們也稱這樣的人為『沉淪的人』(perditos)。但那若是恆存的、若是堅立的、若是始終如一的——如同德行——便是某種實有之物。德行中至大而至美的一部分,就是所謂的節制與節儉。但這若過於隱晦,以致你們如今還不能明白它,至少你們承認這點:即若未受教之人的心思也是充實的,那麼正如身體有兩種養料,心思也有兩種養料——一種是有益而有用的,另一種是致病而有害的。」
26:22
Quae cum ita sint. arbitror die natali meo. quoniam duo quaedam esse in homine conuenit inter nos, id est corpus atque animam, non me prandium paulo lautius corporibus nostris solum sed animis etiam exhibere debere. quod autem hoc sit prandium, si esuritis, proferam. nam si uos inuitos et fastidientes alere conabor. frustra operam insumam magisque uota facienda sunt. ut tales epulas potius quam illas corporis desideretis. quod eueniet. si sani animi uestri fuerint; aegri enim, sicut in morbis ipsius corporis uidemus, cibos suos recusant et respuunt. — Omnes se uultu ipso et consentiente uoce quidquid praeparassem iam sumere ac uorare uelle dixerunt. Atque ego rursus exordiens:
'Since these things are so, I think that on my birthday, seeing that we agree there are two things in a man — that is, body and soul — I ought to set forth a somewhat more sumptuous meal not for our bodies only, but for our souls as well. But what this meal is, if you are hungry, I will bring forth. For if I try to feed you unwilling and disdainful, I shall spend my labour in vain, and vows must rather be made that you may desire such fare rather than that of the body — which will come to pass if your minds are healthy; for the sick, as we see in the diseases of the body itself, refuse and spit out their food.' — All said, by their very look and with consenting voice, that they now wished to take and devour whatever I had prepared. And I, beginning again:
「既然這些事是如此,我想在我的生辰之日,既然我們一致認為人裡面有兩樣東西——就是身體與靈魂——我便當擺設一頓較為豐盛的餐食,不僅為我們的身體,也為我們的靈魂。但這餐食是什麼,你們若餓了,我就端出來。因為我若試圖餵養你們這些不情願、生厭之人,便是徒然勞力,倒不如許願,願你們寧渴慕這樣的筵席過於身體的筵席——這事必要成就,倘若你們的心思是健康的;因為病人,正如我們在身體自身的疾病中所見,會拒絕並吐掉自己的食物。」——眾人都以他們的神色、以贊同的聲音表示,如今無論我預備了什麼,他們都願接取並吞食。於是我重新起頭說:
26:23
Beatos nos esse uo- lumus, inquam. — l\'ix hoc effuderam, occurrerunt una uoce consentientes. — Uideturne uobis, inquam, beatus esse, qui quod uult non habet? — Negauerunt. — Quid? omnis, qui quod uult habet. beatus est? — Tum mater: Si bona, inquit, uelit et habeat, beatus est, si autem mala uelit, quamuis habeat. miser est. ■— (\'Cui ego arridens atque gestiens: Ipsam, inquam, prorsus, mater, arcem philosophiae tenuisti. nam tibi procul dubio uerba defuerunt, ut non sicut Tullius te modo panderes, cuius de hac sententia uerba ista sunt. nam in Hortensio. quem de laude ac defensione philosophiae librum fecit: ecce autem.
'We wish to be happy,' I said. — Scarcely had I poured this out when they concurred with one voice. — 'Does it seem to you,' I said, 'that he is happy who does not have what he wills?' — They denied it. — 'What? Is everyone who has what he wills happy?' — Then mother: 'If he wills good things,' she said, 'and has them, he is happy; but if he wills evil things, though he have them, he is wretched.' — To her, smiling and delighted, I said: 'Mother, you have grasped the very citadel of philosophy. For doubtless words only failed you, so that you did not just now unfold yourself like Tullius, whose words on this opinion are these. For in the Hortensius, the book he made in praise and defence of philosophy: But behold,'
我說:「我們願意得福(幸福)。」——這話我方一說出,他們便異口同聲地表示認同。——我說:「你們是否覺得,那沒有得著自己所願之物的人是有福的?」——他們否認。——「怎麼?凡得著自己所願之物的人都是有福的嗎?」——這時母親說:「他若願的是善的、又得著了,他便是有福的;但他若願的是惡的,縱使得著了,他仍是可憐的。」——我對她笑著、歡然地說:「母親,你已然把握住了哲學的堡壘本身。因為你無疑只是缺了言辭,以致你未能像圖利烏斯(西塞羅)那樣把自己方才所說的鋪陳出來,他論此見解的言辭如下。因為在《霍爾滕西烏斯》——那本他為稱讚並辯護哲學而寫的書中——他說:『但看哪,』」
26:24
ait, non philosophi quidem, sed promti tamen ad disputandum omnes aiunt esse beatos, qui uiuant ut ipsi uelint. falsum id quidem; uelle enim quod non deceat, id est ipsum miserrimum. nec tam miserum est non adipisci quod uelis, quam adipisci uelle quod non oporteat. plus enim mali prauitas uoluntatis adfert quam fortuna c u iquam boni. — In quibus uerbis illa sic exclamabat, ut obliti penitus sexus eius magnum aliquem uirum considere nobiscum crederemus me interim, quantum poteram, intellegente, ex quo illa et quam diuino fonte manarent. — Et Licentius: Sed dicendum, inquit, tibi est, ut beatus sit quisque, quid uelle debeat et quarum rerum eum oporteat habere desiderium.
'he says, not philosophers indeed, but men ready enough to dispute, all say that those are happy who live as they themselves will. This is false indeed; for to will what is not fitting, that is itself most wretched. Nor is it so wretched not to attain what you will as to will to attain what you ought not. For the depravity of the will brings more of evil to anyone than fortune brings of good.' — At these words she cried out in such a way that, forgetting utterly her sex, we believed that some great man was sitting with us — while I, meanwhile, understood as well as I could from what and from how divine a source these things flowed forth. — And Licentius: 'But you must tell us,' he said, 'in order that anyone may be happy, what he ought to will and of what things it behoves him to have desire.'
「他說,其實不是哲學家,而是那些頗善於辯論的人,都說那些照自己所願而活的人是有福的。這誠然是虛謊的;因為願那不合宜的事,那本身正是最可憐的。得不著你所願的,並不像願得你所不該得的那樣可憐。因為意志的敗壞給任何人所帶來的惡,多過命運所帶來的善。」——聽了這些話,她如此喊叫起來,以致我們全然忘了她的性別,竟以為有某位偉人與我們同坐——而我當時盡我所能地體會,這些話是從何等根源、從何等神聖的泉源流溢而出的。——利肯提烏斯說:「但你必須告訴我們,為使人得福,他當願什麼、又當對哪些事物懷有渴慕。」
26:25
— Inuita me, inquam, natali tuo, quando dignaberis; quidquid apposueris libenter sumam. qua conditione hodie apud me ut epuleris, peto nec flagites, quod fortasse non est paratum. — Quem cum modestae ac uerecundae commonitionis suaepaeniteret: Ergo illud, inquam, conuenit inter nos, neque quemquam beatum esse posse, qui quod uult non habet, neque omnem, qui quod uult habet, beatum esse? — Dederunt. Quid illud ? inquam, conceditis omnem, qui beatus non sit, miserum esse? — Non dubitauerunt. — Omnis igitur, inquam, qui quod uult non habet, miser est. — Placuit omnibus. — Quid ergo sibi homo conparare debet, ut beatus sit ? inquam;
— 'Invite me,' I said, 'on your birthday, whenever you shall deem me worthy; whatever you set before me I shall gladly take. On this condition I ask that today you feast at my table, and do not demand what is perhaps not prepared.' — When he was sorry for his modest and bashful reminder: 'Then this,' I said, 'is agreed among us: that no one can be happy who does not have what he wills, nor is everyone who has what he wills happy?' — They granted it. 'What of this?' I said; 'do you concede that everyone who is not happy is wretched?' — They did not doubt it. — 'Everyone, therefore,' I said, 'who does not have what he wills is wretched.' — It pleased all. — 'What then ought a man to procure for himself, that he may be happy?' I said;
——我說:「在你的生辰之日,等你認為我配得的時候,就邀請我吧;無論你擺上什麼,我都樂意領受。我以此為條件求你,今天在我的席上受款待,別索求那也許尚未預備好的東西。」——當他為自己那謙遜、羞怯的提醒而懊悔時,我說:「那麼我們之間便議定了:沒有得著自己所願之物的人不能是有福的,而凡得著自己所願之物的人也未必都是有福的?」——他們承認了。我說:「那麼這個怎麼樣?你們可承認凡不是有福的人便是可憐的?」——他們毫不懷疑。——我說:「那麼,凡沒有得著自己所願之物的人便是可憐的。」——眾人都以為然。——我說:「那麼人當為自己置備什麼,才能得福呢?」
26:26
forte enim etiam hoc isti nostro conuiuio subministrabitur, ne Licenti auiditas neglegatur; nam id, opinor, ei conparandum est, quod cum uult habet. — Manifestum esse dixerunt. — Id ergo, inquam, semper manens nec ex fortuna pendulum nec ullis subiectum casibus esse debet. nam quidquid mortale et caducum est, non potest a nobis, quando uolumus et quamdiu uolumus, haberi. — Adsentiebantur omnes. sed Trygetius: Sunt, inquit. multi fortunati, qui eas ipsas res fragiles casibusque subiectas tamen iucundas pro hac uita cumulate largeque possideant nec quicquam illis eorum quae uolunt desit. — Cui ego: Qui timet. inquam, uideturne tibi beatus esse? — Non uidetur, inquit.
'for perhaps this too will be supplied to this our banquet of ours, lest Licentius' craving be neglected; for that, I suppose, is what he must procure, which he has when he wills.' — They said it was manifest. — 'That, then,' I said, 'ought to be something always abiding, neither dependent on fortune nor subject to any chances. For whatever is mortal and perishable cannot be had by us when we will and as long as we will.' — All assented. But Trygetius: 'There are,' he said, 'many fortunate men who nonetheless possess those very things, fragile and subject to chances, as pleasant, abundantly and lavishly for this life, and none of the things they will is lacking to them.' — To him I said: 'Does one who fears seem to you to be happy?' — 'He does not,' he said.
「因為這個或許也能供給我們這場筵席,免得利肯提烏斯的渴望被忽略了;因為我想他所當置備的,正是他一願就得著的東西。」——他們說這是顯而易見的。——我說:「那麼那東西當是恆久常存的、既不倚賴命運、也不受任何變故支配的。因為凡是必死而易朽的,我們無法在我們願意時、且照我們所願的長短來擁有。」——眾人都表贊同。但特呂革提烏斯說:「有許多幸運的人,儘管那些東西脆弱而易遭變故,他們卻仍豐豐富富、綽綽有餘地擁有它們作為此生的樂事,而他們所願的事物無一缺乏。」——我對他說:「一個懼怕的人,在你看來是有福的嗎?」——他說:「不是。」
26:27
— Ergo quod amat quisque si amittere potest. potestne non timere? — Non potest, inquit. — Amitti autem possunt illa fortuita. non igitur hoc qui amat et possidet, potest ullo modo beatus esse. — Nihil repugnauit. hoc loco autem mater: Etiamsi securus sit, inquit, ea se omnia non esse amissurum, tamen talibus satiari non poterit. ergo et eo miser, quo semper est indiguus. — Cui ego: Quid, si, inquam. his omnibus abundans rebus atque circumfluens cupiendi modum sibi statuat eisque contentus decenter iucundeque perfruatur, nonne tibi uidetur beatus? — Non ergo, inquit, illis rebus, sed animi sui moderatione beatus est. — Optime.
— 'Then if whatever anyone loves he can lose, can he fail to fear?' — 'He cannot,' he said. — 'But those fortuitous things can be lost. Therefore he who loves and possesses this can in no way be happy.' — Nothing opposed this. But at this point mother: 'Even if he be secure,' she said, 'that he will not lose all those things, yet with such things he cannot be sated. Therefore he too is wretched, in that he is always in want.' — To her I said: 'What if,' I said, 'abounding and overflowing with all these things, he set for himself a limit of desiring, and, content with them, enjoyed them fittingly and pleasantly — does he not seem to you happy?' — 'Then it is not by those things,' she said, 'but by the moderation of his own mind, that he is happy.' — 'Excellently,'
——「那麼,凡人所愛的若都能失去,他豈能不懼怕?」——他說:「他不能不懼怕。」——「但那些偶然之物是能失去的。因此愛而擁有這些的人,斷不能是有福的。」——無人反駁這話。但這時母親說:「縱使他確信自己不會失去那一切,他仍無法以這樣的東西得飽足。因此他也是可憐的,因他總是在匱乏之中。」——我對她說:「那麼,若他富有並洋溢著這一切,卻為自己定下渴求的限度,並以之為足、合宜而愉悅地享用它們,他在你看來豈不是有福的嗎?」——她說:「那麼他之所以有福,就不是因那些東西,而是因他自己心思的節制了。」——我說:「說得極好,」
26:28
inquam, nec huic interrogationi aliud nec abs te aliud debuit responderi. ergo nullo modo dubitamus, si quis beatus esse statuit, id eum sibi conparare debere, quod semper manet nec ulla saeuiente fortuna eripi potest. — Hoc, inquit Trygetius, iam dudum consensimus. - Deus, inquam, uobis aeternus esse semper manens uidetur? — Hoc quidem, inquit Licentius, ita certum est. ut interrogatione non egeat, ceterique omnes pia deuotione concinuerunt. — Deum igitur, inquam, qui habet, beatus est. Quod cum gaudentes libentissime acciperent: Nihil ergo. inquam, nobis iam quaerendum arbitror esse nisi. quis hominum habeat deum; beatus enim profecto is erit.-de quo quaero, quid uobis uideatur.
I said, 'neither to this question ought anything else to have been answered, nor anything else by you. Therefore we in no way doubt that, if anyone has resolved to be happy, he ought to procure for himself that which always abides and cannot be snatched away by any raging fortune.' — 'This,' said Trygetius, 'we agreed to long ago.' — 'Does God,' I said, 'seem to you eternal and always abiding?' — 'This indeed,' said Licentius, 'is so certain that it needs no questioning'; and all the rest chimed in with pious devotion. — 'God, therefore,' I said, 'whoever has him, is happy.' — When they received this joyfully and most willingly: 'Nothing then,' I said, 'do I think we now need to inquire, save which of men has God; for he assuredly will be happy — and concerning this I ask what seems to you.'
我說:「無論是對這問題,還是由你來答,都不當有別的回答。因此我們絕不懷疑:倘若有人決意要得福,他便當為自己置備那恆久常存、無論命運如何肆虐都奪不去的東西。」——特呂革提烏斯說:「這個我們老早就同意了。」——我說:「上帝在你們看來是永恆而恆久常存的嗎?」——利肯提烏斯說:「這實在是確鑿到毋須質問的地步」;其餘眾人也都以虔敬的敬拜之心齊聲附和。——我說:「那麼,凡擁有上帝的人便是有福的。」——當他們極其樂意、歡然領受這話時,我說:「那麼我想我們如今無須再探究別的,只須查究人中誰擁有上帝;因為那人必定是有福的——關於這事,我要問你們有何看法。」
26:29
- Hic Licentius: Deum habet, qui bene uiuit. — Trygetius : Deum habet, inquit, qui facit quae deus uult fieri. — In cuius sententiam Lartidianus concessit. puer autem ille minimus omnium: Is habet deum, ait, qui spiritum inmundum non habet. — Mater uero omnia, sed hoc maxime adprobauit. Nauigius tacebat. quem cum interrogassem quid sentiret, illud ultimum sibi placere respondit. nec Rusticum percontari uisum est neglegendum, quaenam esset de re tanta eius sententia; qui mihi uidebatur non deliberatione magis quam pudore inpeditus silere. Trygetio consensit. Tum ego: Teneo, inquam, omnium placita de re magna sane et ultra quam nec quaeri quicquam oportet nec inueniri potest.
— Here Licentius: 'He has God who lives well.' — Trygetius: 'He has God,' he said, 'who does what God wills to be done.' — To this opinion Lartidianus agreed. But that youngest one of all: 'He has God,' he said, 'who does not have an unclean spirit.' — Mother approved all these, but this last most of all. Navigius was silent. When I asked him what he thought, he answered that this last pleased him. Nor did it seem right to neglect asking Rusticus what his opinion on so great a matter might be; he seemed to me to be silent, hindered not so much by deliberation as by bashfulness. He agreed with Trygetius. Then I: 'I hold,' I said, 'the opinions of all on a matter truly great, and beyond which nothing ought either to be sought or can be found.'
——這時利肯提烏斯說:「凡活得好的人便擁有上帝。」——特呂革提烏斯說:「凡行上帝所願要成就之事的人便擁有上帝。」——拉爾提狄亞努斯贊同這見解。但那年紀最幼的一位說:「凡沒有污鬼的人便擁有上帝。」——母親對這一切都表贊同,但尤其贊同這最後一句。拿維吉烏斯默然不語。當我問他有何想法時,他回答說這最後一句合他的意。我也覺得不當忽略去問魯斯提庫斯,看他對這等大事有何見解;他在我看來之所以沉默,與其說是因為在斟酌,不如說是被羞怯所攔阻。他贊同了特呂革提烏斯。於是我說:「我如今掌握了眾人對這件確實極大、且無可再求、無可再尋之事的看法。」
26:30
si modo eam, ut coepimus, serenissime ac sincerissime inuestigemus. quod hodie quia longum est et habent in epulis suis et animi quandam luxuriem, si ultra modum in eas et uoraciter inruant — ita enim male quodam modo digerunt; unde ualetudini mentium non minus quam ab illa ipsa fame metuendum est — melius nos haec quaestio cras esurientes, si uidetur, accipiet. illud modo libenter ligurriatis uolo, quod subito mihi ministratori uestro in mentem suggestum est inferendum, et est, ni fallor — qualia solent ultima adponi — quasi scholastico melle confectum atque conditum. — Quo. audito sese omnes quasi in elatum ferculum tetenderunt coagitaueruntque, ut dicere properarem, quidnam id esset.
'if only we investigate it, as we have begun, most serenely and most sincerely. But because this is a long matter for today, and they have in their meal a certain luxuriance of mind as well — if beyond measure and greedily they rush upon these things, for so they in a manner digest ill; whence no less danger is to be feared for the health of minds than from that very hunger — this question, if it seems good, will better receive us tomorrow when we are hungry. Only I wish you now to lick with pleasure at that which has suddenly been suggested to my mind must be brought in by your waiter — and it is, unless I am mistaken, such as the last courses are wont to be set out, as though confected and seasoned with a certain scholastic honey.' — Hearing this, they all reached out, as it were, toward the raised dish and pressed together, that I should hasten to say what it might be.
「只要我們照我們所開始的,以至寧靜、至誠懇的態度去探究它。但因這事今天講來嫌長,而且他們在餐食中也有一種心思上的過度享受——倘若他們過度而貪婪地衝向這些東西,因為他們那樣多少會消化不良;由此,對心思的健康所當懼怕的危險,不亞於那飢餓本身——所以這問題若你們覺得好,明天等我們餓了時再來領受它會更好。如今我只願你們愉快地舔嚐一樣東西,就是突然浮上我心頭、當由你們的侍者端上來的——而它,若我沒弄錯,正如末道菜慣常擺上的那樣,彷彿以某種學院之蜜所調製、所醃漬的。」——聽了這話,眾人便彷彿都朝那端上的盤子伸手、擠成一團,催我趕快說出那究竟是什麼。
26:31
— Quid, inquam, putatis nisi cum Academicis totum, quod susceperamus, confectum esse negotium? — Quo accepto nomine tres illi, quibus res nota erat, sese erexerunt alacrius et uelut porrectis, ut fit, manibus inferentem ministrum adiuuerunt quibus potuerunt uerbis, nihil se iucundius audituros esse monstrantes. Tum ego ita rem posui: Si manifestum est, inquam, beatum non esse, qui quod uult non habet — quod paulo ante ratio demonstrauit — nemo autem quaerit, quod inuenire non uult, et quaerunt illi semper ueritatem — uolunt ergo inuenire, uolunt igitur habere inuentionem ueritatis — at non inueniunt, sequitur eos non habere quod uolunt, et ex eo sequitur etiam beatos non esse.
— 'What,' I said, 'do you think, except that with the Academics the whole business we had taken up has been settled?' — At the mention of this name, those three, to whom the matter was known, raised themselves up more eagerly, and, as it happens, with hands as it were outstretched, helped the servant bringing it in with such words as they could, showing that they would hear nothing more delightful. Then I put the matter thus: 'If it is manifest,' I said, 'that he is not happy who does not have what he wills — which reason demonstrated a little while ago — and no one seeks what he does not wish to find, and they always seek the truth — they wish, therefore, to find it; they wish, therefore, to have the discovery of the truth — but they do not find it, it follows that they do not have what they will, and from this it follows also that they are not happy.
——我說:「你們想是什麼呢?無非是說:我們所著手的整件事,靠著學園派已經解決了!」——一聽到這名字,那三位知情的人便更加熱切地挺起身來,並且如其常態,彷彿伸出雙手,用他們所能的言辭幫助那端菜進來的僕人,表明他們再沒有比這更中聽的了。於是我這樣提出此事:「若明明可見,那沒有得著自己所願之物的人不是有福的——這是理性方才所證明的——而且無人尋求他不願尋見的東西,又這些人始終尋求真理——那麼他們是願意尋見真理的;因此他們是願意擁有對真理的尋獲的——但他們並未尋見,那麼結論便是他們沒有得著自己所願的,而由此又推出他們不是有福的。
26:32
at nemo sapiens nisi beatus: sapiens igitur Academicus non est. - Hic repente illi quasi totum rapientes exclamauerunt. sed Licentius adtentius et cautius aduertens timuit adsensionem atque subiecit: Rapui quidem uobiscum, si quidem exclamaui illa conclusione commotus. sed nihil hinc admittam in uiscera et partem meam seruabo Alypio; nam aut simul eam mecum lambet aut admonebit, cur non oporteat adtingere. — Dulcia, inquam, magis metuere Nauigius deberet splene uitioso. — Hic ille arridens: Plane me, inquit, talia sanabunt. nam nescio quo modo contortum hoc et aculeatum, quod posuisti, ut ait ille de melle Hymetio, acriter dulce est nihilque inflat uiscera.
'But no one is wise unless he is happy: the Academic, therefore, is not wise.' — Hereupon suddenly those men cried out, as if snatching the whole thing. But Licentius, attending more carefully and warily, feared his assent and interjected: 'I did indeed snatch it along with you, since I cried out, moved by that conclusion. But I will admit nothing hence into my vitals, and I will keep my portion for Alypius; for either he will lap it up together with me, or he will warn me why it ought not to be touched.' — 'Navigius,' I said, 'ought rather to fear sweet things, with his defective spleen.' — Hereupon he, smiling: 'Plainly,' he said, 'such things will cure me. For somehow this twisted and barbed thing which you have set forth — as that man says of Hymettian honey — is sharply sweet and puffs up the vitals not at all.'
「然而除非人是有福的,否則無人是有智慧的:所以那學園派的人並不是有智慧的。」——聽到這裡,那些人突然喊叫起來,彷彿要把整個結論奪過去。但利肯提烏斯更加謹慎小心地留意著,唯恐貿然贊同,便插話說:「我確實與你們一同奪取了它,因為我被那結論所打動而喊叫。但我不會由此把任何東西納入我的臟腑,我要為阿呂皮烏斯(Alypius)保留我那一份;因為他要麼與我一同舔嚐它,要麼就警告我為何不當觸碰它。」——我說:「倒是拿維吉烏斯憑他有病的脾,更該懼怕甜食。」——這時他笑著說:「明明白白,這樣的東西正會醫治我。因為不知怎地,你所提出的這個曲折而帶刺的東西——正如那人論許墨托斯(Hymettus)之蜜所說的——是尖銳地甘甜,而絲毫不使臟腑脹氣。」
26:33
quare totum etiam palato aliquantum remorso tamen, ut possum, libentissime in medullas traicio. non enim uideo, quomodo redargui possit ista conclusio. — Prorsus nullo modo potest, inquit Trygetius; quare gaudeo iam diu cum illis me inimicitias suscepisse. nam qua nescio inpellente natura uel, ut uerius dicam, deo etiam nesciens, quomodo refellendi essent, tamen eis nimis aduersabar. Hic Licentius: Ego, inquit, illos nondum desero. — Ergo, ait Trygetius, dissentis a nobis? — Numquidnam, ille inquit, uos ab Alypio dissentitis? — Cui ego: Non dubito, inquam, quin, si adesset Alypius, huic ratiunculae cederet.
'Wherefore, even with my palate somewhat bitten, yet, as I can, I most gladly pass the whole of it into my marrow. For I do not see how this conclusion can be refuted.' — 'It can in no way at all,' said Trygetius; 'wherefore I rejoice that I long ago took up enmities with those men. For, by I know not what nature impelling me — or, to speak more truly, by God, even without my knowing how they were to be refuted — I nonetheless was too much opposed to them.' Hereupon Licentius: 'I,' he said, 'do not yet desert them.' — 'Then,' said Trygetius, 'you dissent from us?' — 'Do you, then,' he said, 'in any way dissent from Alypius?' — To him I said: 'I do not doubt that, if Alypius were present, he would yield to this little argument.
「因此,縱使我的味蕾稍被咬了一口,我仍盡我所能,極其樂意地把它整個嚥入我的骨髓。因為我看不出這結論如何能被駁倒。」——特呂革提烏斯說:「它斷斷不能被駁倒;因此我歡喜自己老早就與那些人結了仇。因為由我不知的某種本性所驅使——或更確切地說,由上帝所驅使,即便我還不知該如何駁倒他們——我仍舊過分地與他們為敵。」這時利肯提烏斯說:「我還不肯離棄他們。」——特呂革提烏斯說:「那麼你是與我們相左了?」——他說:「那麼你們豈不是與阿呂皮烏斯相左嗎?」——我對他說:「我不懷疑,倘若阿呂皮烏斯在場,他必會向這小小的論證讓步。
26:34
non enim tam absurde sentire poterat, ut aut beatus illi uideretur, qui tantum bonum animi, quod ardentissime habere uellet, non haberet, aut illos nolle inuenire ueritatem aut cum, qui beatus non sit, esse sapientem; nam his tribus quasi melle farre atque nuculeis illud quod metuis gustare confectum est. — Illene huic tam prauae puerorum inlecebrae cederet Academicorum tanta ubertate deserta, qua inundante hoc nescio quid breue aut obruetur aut pertrahetur ? — Quasi uero, inquam, longum aliquid nos quaeramus praesertim aduersus Alypium; nam non mediocriter parua ista esse fortia et utilia satis sibi ipse de tuo corpore argumentatur.
'For he could not think so absurdly as either that he should seem happy who did not have that great good of the mind which he most ardently wished to have, or that those men do not wish to find the truth, or that one who is not happy is wise; for by these three things, as by honey, meal, and little nuts, that which you fear to taste has been confected.' — 'Would he yield to this so depraved enticement of boys, once the Academics' so great richness had been deserted, by whose flood this — I know not what brief thing — would be either overwhelmed or dragged away?' — 'As though indeed,' I said, 'we were seeking something long, especially against Alypius; for he himself argues, not moderately, from your own body, that these small things are strong and useful enough.'
「因為他不至於荒謬到這地步,竟認為:或是那不擁有他所最熱切渴望擁有的、心思之大善的人,也算得有福;或是那些人並不願尋見真理;或是那不有福的人卻是有智慧的;因為你所懼於品嚐的那東西,正是由這三樣——如同蜜、麵與小堅果——所調製成的。」——「他豈會離棄學園派那樣的豐盛,向孩童們這般敗壞的誘惑讓步,而讓那——我不知是什麼的短小之物——被那豐盛的洪流所淹沒或沖走呢?」——我說:「彷彿我們真是在尋求什麼冗長之物似的,尤其是針對阿呂皮烏斯;因為他自己就從你自己的身體上,很有力地論證:這些微小之物是夠剛強、夠有用的。」
26:35
tu autem, qui elegisti de absentis auctoritate pendere, quid horum non probas ? utrum beatum non esse, qui quod uult non habet ? an illos negas uelle habere inuentam ueritatem, quam uehementer inquirunt? an uidetur tibi quisquam sapiens non beatus? — Prorsus beatus est, inquit, qui quod uult non habet, quasi stomachanter arridens. quod cum iuberem ut scriberetur: Non dixi, inquit exclamans. quod item cum annuerem scribi: Dixi, inquit. atque ego semel praeceperam, ut nullum uerbum praeter litteras funderet. ita adulescentem inter uerecundiam atque constantiam exagitatum tenebam.
'But you, who have chosen to hang upon the authority of one who is absent — which of these do you not approve? Whether that he is not happy who does not have what he wills? Or do you deny that those men wish to have the truth found, which they so vehemently seek? Or does anyone seem to you wise who is not happy?' — 'He is quite happy,' he said, 'who does not have what he wills' — smiling as though in vexation. And when I ordered this to be written down: 'I did not say it,' he said, crying out. And when again I nodded that it be written: 'I did say it,' he said. And I had once for all given orders that no word be poured forth except the letters. Thus I kept the youth stirred up between bashfulness and constancy.
「但你既選擇倚賴一位不在場之人的權威,這幾點中你有哪一點不贊同呢?是那沒有得著自己所願之物的人不是有福的這一點嗎?抑或你否認那些人願意尋見他們如此極力尋求的真理?抑或你覺得有哪個不有福的人卻是有智慧的?」——他彷彿懊惱地笑著說:「那沒有得著自己所願之物的人,正是十分有福的。」而當我吩咐把這話記下來時,他喊叫著說:「我沒有這樣說過。」而當我又點頭示意要記下來時,他又說:「我是這樣說過了。」我已一次性下令,除了字句之外,一個字也不許他說出來。就這樣,我使這少年在羞怯與固執之間被撩撥、被我拿住。
26:36
Sed cum his uerbis eum iocantes quasi ad uescendam particulam suam prouocamus, animaduerti ceteros rei totius ignaros et scire cupientes, quid inter nos solos tam iucunde ageretur, sine risu nos intueri. qui mihi prorsus similes uisi sunt — quod plerumque solet- his, qui cum epulantur inter auidissimos rapacissimosque conuiuas, a rapiendo uel grauitate sese abstinent uel pudore terrentur. et quia ego inuitaueram et magni cuiusdam hominis personam atque, ut totum explicem, ueri hominis etiam in illis l\'pulis inuitatorem sustinere docuisti, commouit me illa inaequalitas mensae nostrae et discrepantia. adrisi matri.
But when with these words we jokingly urged him, as it were, to eat up his portion, I noticed that the others, ignorant of the whole matter and eager to know what was being carried on so pleasantly between just the two of us, looked upon us without laughing. They seemed to me altogether like — as very often happens — those who, when they feast among the greediest and most rapacious of table-companions, refrain from snatching either out of self-restraint or are held back by shame. And because I had issued the invitation, and you had taught me to sustain the role of a certain great man and — to unfold the whole of it — even of a true man who invites others to those feasts, that inequality and discordance of our table moved me. I smiled at my mother.
但當我們用這些話戲謔地慫恿他,彷彿要他吃掉自己那一份時,我注意到其餘那些不明就裡、卻又渴望知道我們兩人之間為何如此愉快地進行著什麼事的人,正不笑地望著我們。在我看來,他們完全像是——這是常有的情形——那些在最貪婪、最饕餮的同席者中間赴宴、卻或因自制而不去搶奪、或因羞愧而有所畏縮的人。而因為是我發出的邀請,並且你曾教導我要擔當某位偉人的角色,甚至——把整件事說透——擔當一位真正之人、一位邀人赴那些筵席者的角色,我們席上這種不均與參差便觸動了我。我對母親微微一笑。
26:37
atque illa liberrime, quod minus habebant, quasi de suo cellario promendum imperans: Iam dic uobis, inquit, et redde, qui sint isti Academici et quid sibi uelint. — Cui breuiter cum exposuissem aperteque ita, ut nemo illorum ignarus abscederet: Isti homines, inquit, caducarii sunt — quo nomine uulgo apud nos uocantur, quos comitialis morbus subuertit — et simul surrexit, ut abiret. atque hic omnes laeti ac ridentes interposito fine discessimus. Postridie autem, cum item post prandium sed aliquanto quam pridie serius idem ibidemque consedissemus: Tarde, inquam, uenistis ad conuiuium;
And she, most freely — as though commanding that what they lacked be brought forth from her own storeroom — said: 「Now tell us, and explain, who these Academics are and what they mean.」 When I had briefly and openly set it forth to her in such a way that none of them departed uninformed, she said: 「These men are 'fallers' (caducarii)」 — by which name those whom the epileptic disease overthrows are commonly called among us — and at once she rose to leave. And here we all, glad and laughing, broke off and departed. On the next day, however, when likewise after the midday meal, but somewhat later than the day before, we had sat down at the same place, I said: 「You have come late to the banquet;」
她極其自在地——彷彿吩咐要從自己的儲藏室裡把他們所欠缺的取出來——說:「現在告訴我們,說清楚,這些學園派的人是誰,他們是甚麼意思。」當我簡短而坦率地向她講明,講到他們無一人不明白而離去時,她說:「這些人是『倒下者』(caducarii)」——在我們這裡,凡被癲癇病所擊倒的人,通常都用這名字稱呼——她隨即起身要離開。到這裡我們眾人都歡喜大笑,就此打住而散去。然而次日,同樣在午餐之後,但比前一天稍晚些,我們在同一地方坐下時,我說:「你們赴宴來得晚了;」
26:38
quod uobis non cruditate accidisse arbitror, sed paucitatis ferculorum securitate, quod non tam mature adgrediendum uisum est, quod cito uos peresuros putastis. non multum enim reliquiarum credendum erat remansisse, ubi die ipso atque sollemnitate exiguum repertum erat. fortasse recte. sed quid uobis praeparatum sit, ego quoque uobiscum nescio. alius est enim, qui omnibus cum omnes tum maxime tales epulas praebere non cessat, sed nos ab edendo uel inbecillitate uel saturitate uel negotio plerumque cessamus; quem manentem in hominibus beatos eos facere inter nos heri, nisi fallor, pie constanterque conuenerat.
which I judge did not happen to you from indigestion, but from a sense of security about the scarcity of the courses, since it seemed to you that there was no great need to set to early upon what you supposed you would quickly devour to the end. For it was not to be believed that much of the leftovers remained, where on the very day and festival itself only a little had been found. Perhaps rightly. But what has been prepared for you, I too, along with you, do not know. For there is another who does not cease to furnish such feasts to all — both to all in general and most of all to such as these — but we, whether from weakness or satiety or business, for the most part hold back from eating; and it had, yesterday, if I am not mistaken, been piously and firmly agreed among us that he, abiding in men, makes them blessed.
我認為這並非因你們消化不良所致,而是因你們對菜餚稀少感到安心,因為在你們看來,並無太大必要及早動手去吃你們料想很快就能吃盡的東西。因為既然在節慶當日本身也只找到一點點,就不該相信還剩下很多殘餚。或許你們是對的。但是為你們預備了甚麼,我也和你們一樣不知道。因為另有一位,祂不停地把這樣的筵席供給眾人——既供給所有人,尤其供給像這樣的人——而我們,或因軟弱、或因飽足、或因俗務,大多停止進食;並且昨日,若我沒記錯,我們曾虔敬而堅定地達成一致:這位常住在人裡面者,使人得福。
next part →
← ch. 25ch. 27 →
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364

Tell me when new readings are published

One email per new chapter reading. Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe.