In the sixth consulship of Honorius Augustus, on the seventh day before the Ides of December, Augustine, bishop of the Catholic Church of the districts of Hippo Regius, said: You know that yesterday you said that you could defend the writings of Manichaeus and assert that they possess the truth. If this pleases you, and today you also either undertake or presume that you can do it, say so. Felix the Manichaean said: I do not deny that I said I would defend my law, if the authors of my law are brought forward into the open. And when Bishop Augustine had brought forth the letter of Manichaeus which they call «the Foundation,» he said: If I read from this codex, which you see me carrying, the letter of Manichaeus which you call «the Foundation,» can you recognize whether it is the same one? Felix said: I recognize it. Augustine said: Take it yourself and read.
EtcumaccepissetcodicemFelix, legit: ManichaeusapostolusIesuChristiprouidentiadeipatris. haecsuntsalubriauerbaexperenniacuiuofonte: quaequiaudieritetiisdemprimumcrediderit, deindequaeinsinuatasuntcustodierit, numquameritmortiobnoxius, uerumaeternaetgloriosauitafruetur. namprofectobeatusestiudicandus, quihacdiuinainstructuscognitionefuerit, perquamliberatusinsempiternauitapermanebit. AUG. episcopusdixit: AgnouisticerteepistulamManichaeiuestri ?., FEL. dixit: Agnoui. , AUG. dixit: Probanobisergo, quomodoManichaeusistesitapostolusIesuChristi.
And when Felix had received the codex, he read: «Manichaeus, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the providence of God the Father. These are the wholesome words from the perennial and living fountain: which whoever shall have heard, and first believed them, then kept what has been intimated, shall never be subject to death, but shall enjoy eternal and glorious life. For assuredly he is to be judged blessed who shall have been instructed by this divine knowledge, by which, set free, he shall remain in everlasting life.» Bishop Augustine said: You have certainly recognized the letter of your Manichaeus? Felix said: I have recognized it. Augustine said: Prove to us, then, in what way this Manichaeus is an apostle of Jesus Christ.
For we nowhere read of him in the Gospel among the apostles; and we know who was ordained in the place of Judas the betrayer — namely, holy Matthias; and who afterward was called by the voice of the Lord from heaven — that is, the Apostle Paul — all men recognize. Prove to us, then, that this Manichaeus is an apostle of Christ, as he has dared to set down at the head of his letter. Felix said: Let your holiness also prove to me what is written in the Gospel, Christ saying: «I go to the Father; and I send to you the Holy Spirit the Paraclete, who will lead you into all truth.» Prove to me, apart from this Scripture, that this is the Scripture of the Holy Spirit which Christ promised, where all truth is to be found;
etsiinueneroueritateminaliiscodicibus, quiadManichaeumnonpertinent, etChristusillostradidit — sicenimdictumestaChristo, quiaspiritussanctusparacletusipseinomnemueritateminducet — secundumChristisermonemegoscripturamManichaeirecuso. AUG. dixit:
and if I find the truth in other codices that do not pertain to Manichaeus, and Christ delivered those — for it was so said by Christ, that the Holy Spirit the Paraclete Himself will lead into all truth — then, according to the word of Christ, I reject the Scripture of Manichaeus. Augustine said:
Since, then, you have not been able to prove in what way Manichaeus is an apostle of Christ, and you demand that I prove in what way He sent the Holy Spirit the Paraclete whom He promised — so that you may then reject the writings of Manichaeus, if you find the promise of Christ fulfilled apart from the writings of Manichaeus — although you ought first to have answered my questions, nevertheless, behold, I answer first and show you when the Holy Spirit was sent whom Christ promised. And he goes to the Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles. And when he had received the codex of the Gospel, he recited: «But while they were speaking these things, Jesus stood in the midst of them and said to them: Peace be to you; it is I, do not fear.» And as he was reading, he said: This is after the resurrection.
And when he had said this, he read: «But they, troubled and terrified, supposed that they saw a spirit. And He said to them: Why are you troubled, and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? See my hands and feet, that it is I myself; handle me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones, as you see me to have. And when He had said this, He showed them His hands and feet. And while they still did not believe, and marvelled for joy, He said: Have you anything here to eat? And they offered Him a piece of broiled fish and a honeycomb. And when He had eaten before them, taking the remains He gave them to them and said to them:»
These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, for it is necessary that all things be fulfilled which are written concerning me in the law of Moses and in the prophets and in the psalms. Then he opened their understanding, that they might comprehend the Scriptures, and he said to them: Thus it is written, and thus it behooved the Christ to suffer and to rise again from the dead on the third day, and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And you are witnesses of these things. And I will send the promise of my Father upon you; but stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high. And when he had handed back the book of the Gospel, he took up the Acts of the Apostles and said:
We have heard in the Gospel that the holy Evangelist recalled the promise of Christ, which is in the Gospel according to John, which Felix here present has recalled. For where the Lord said, 'I send to you the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete,' John the Evangelist wrote it. But this which I have just read, Luke the Evangelist has attested, and it agrees with the truth of the apostle John. Let us see also how what the Lord promised was accomplished, and how it was fulfilled, so that when the fulfillment of the Lord's promise has been set forth from the canonical books of the holy Church, we may not seek another Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, lest we fall into the snares of seducers. And he read from the Acts of the Apostles:
Theophilus, I made my first discourse concerning all the things that Jesus began to do and to teach, on the day when he chose the apostles through the Holy Spirit and commanded them to preach the Gospel; to whom also he showed himself alive after his passion by many proofs, being seen by them over forty days and speaking of the kingdom of God and how he conversed with them. And he commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to await the promise of the Father, 'which,' he said, 'you have heard from my mouth; for John indeed baptized with water, but you shall begin to be baptized with the Holy Spirit, whom you shall also receive not many days hence, up until Pentecost.' They therefore, coming together, questioned him, saying, 'Lord.'
If at this time you will restore the kingdom to Israel? But he said: No one can know the time which the Father has placed in his own power; but you shall receive the power of the Holy Spirit coming upon you, and you shall be witnesses to me at Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the whole earth. When he had said these things, a cloud received him and he was taken up from them. And as they were gazing while he went into heaven, behold, two men stood by them in white raiment, who said to them: Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, shall so come as you have seen him going into heaven.
Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a sabbath day's journey away. And when they had entered, they went up into the upper room, where dwelt Peter and John, James and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus and Simon Zelotes and Jude the brother of James. And they all were persevering with one accord in prayer, together with the women and Mary, who had been the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren.
And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the hearers and said—now there was a crowd gathered in one place of about a hundred and twenty men—'Brethren, this Scripture must be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit foretold by the mouth of the holy David concerning Judas, who was the guide to those who seized Jesus, for he was numbered among us and had obtained a share of this ministry. This man, therefore, acquired a field from the reward of his iniquity, and bound his neck for himself and fell headlong, and was burst asunder in the middle, and all his bowels gushed out. And this became known to all who dwelt in Jerusalem, so that that field was called in their own tongue Akeldama, that is, the field of blood. For it is written in the book of Psalms:'
'Let his dwelling be desolate, and let there be no one to dwell in it,' and 'Let another take his office.' It is fitting, therefore, that of these men who accompanied us during all the time in which the Lord Jesus Christ went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism of John until that day on which he was taken up from us, one should be with us a witness of his resurrection. And they set forth two, Joseph, who was called Barsabbas, who was also called Justus, and Matthias. And praying, he said: 'You, Lord, who know the hearts of all, show which of these two you have chosen to take up the place of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas fell away to go to his own place.'
And they gave forth their lots, and the lot fell upon Matthias, and he was at once numbered as the twelfth with the eleven apostles. And when he had read this, he said: We have heard who was ordained in the place of Judas the traitor, which I mentioned a little before, lest anyone should creep in by fraud into the number of the apostles and by the name of apostleship deceive the ignorant. Now let us see, as we promised, how the promise of Christ concerning the Holy Spirit was fulfilled. And when he had said this, he read in the passage: In the time when the day of Pentecost was completed, they were all together in one place. And suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a violent gust rushing, and it filled the whole house in which they were sitting.
And there appeared to them tongues divided as of fire, which also settled upon each one of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with various tongues, according as the Spirit gave them to utter. Now there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, men from every nation that is under heaven. And when this sound was made, the crowd came together and was confounded, because each one heard them speaking in his own speech and in his own tongue. And they were astonished and marveled, saying to one another: Are not all these who speak Galileans by nation? And how do we recognize among them the speech in which we were born?
Parthians, Medes, and Elamites, and those who dwell in Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus, Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and the Romans who were present, both Jews and proselytes, Cretans and Arabs, heard them speaking in their own tongues the mighty works of God. And when he had read this, he said: You have now heard of the Holy Spirit and how he was sent. What you required of me I have proved; it remains that you also do what you promised. Since we have found when he sent the Holy Spirit whom he promised, reject that writing which under the name of the Holy Spirit sought to defraud either the reader or the hearer. Felix said:
I do not deny what I said, for when it has been proved to me that the Holy Spirit has taught the truth which I seek, I reject that other writing. For this your Holiness has read to me, where the apostles received the Holy Spirit. And in the apostles themselves I seek one who may teach me concerning the beginning, the middle, and the end. Augustine said: If you read that the Lord said this—'I send you the Holy Spirit, who shall teach you the beginning, the middle, and the end'—you rightly bind me to show what the Holy Spirit taught. Felix said: Since your Holiness says this, that the apostles themselves received the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, I say again:
Of the apostles themselves, whichever you wish, let him teach me what Mani taught me, or let him make void Mani's doctrine—of the twelve, whichever you wish. Augustine said: Far, far be it from the faith of the apostles that they should teach the doctrine of the sacrilegious Mani. But since you say that one of them ought to make void the doctrine of Mani, and yet the holy apostles are now not in the body, I, the least not only of all the apostles but of all bishops—for when could I aspire to the merits of the apostles?—as much as the Lord has deigned to bestow on me of his own Spirit, will make void the doctrine of Mani, when the following portions of that epistle begin to be read, which you yourself do not deny to be Mani's. Felix said: You said that the apostles have departed from the body;
their writings avail even until now. And since your Holiness has said, and since you have given leave to say what we wish without any fear, you said, 'I make void the law of Mani'; and I say: every man is a liar, God alone is truthful; let the Scriptures of God speak. Augustine said: You indeed are both a man and, as the matter itself is about to show, a liar. And since you have spoken what you wished, not from the Scripture of God, it behooves me too to speak what I wish. For if it is the truth of your Mani, it will not be able to be destroyed even by me; but if it is falsehood, what does it matter by whom it is destroyed?
Nevertheless, since you have said concerning the writings of the apostles that although they are not in the body, yet their writings are here—the apostles were taken up before the error of Mani had been born in the world—for that reason the writings of the apostles are not found manifestly disputing against Mani. Yet what the apostle Paul, in that same Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, whom he had received, foresaw would come to pass concerning such men as Mani was, and such as you also are, I will read, that you may recognize it. And having taken the epistle of the apostle Paul to Timothy, he read:
But the Spirit says expressly that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and to doctrines of devils, in the hypocrisy of liars, having their conscience seared, forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful and by those who have known the truth; for every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be rejected which is received with thanksgiving, for it is sanctified by the word of God and by prayer. If you put the brethren in mind of these things, you shall be a good minister of Jesus Christ. And when he had read it, he said:
I say that concerning you and such as you—who say that some creature of God is unclean, and who say that all intercourse, even that which takes place with a wife, is fornication (for this is what he means by 'forbidding to marry')—this was designated and set forth by the Spirit of prophecy. But if you deny that all intercourse is fornication, or if you say that all human food lawful to be eaten is granted to men as clean, then you are not among those whom the apostle proclaimed and prophesied. But if you are found among these things I have said, behold, you have the apostle Paul destroying and making void the doctrine of the Mani that was to come. Therefore answer to what I ask: is all intercourse fornication, or is intercourse with a wife not a sin? Felix.
Said: Let that which the apostle said be read to me again. And it was read again: But the Spirit says expressly that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and to doctrines of devils, in the hypocrisy of liars, having their conscience seared, forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful and by those who have known the truth; for every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be rejected which is received with thanksgiving, for it is sanctified by the word of God and by prayer. If you put the brethren in mind of these things, you shall be a good minister of Jesus Christ. Felix said:
Mani did not depart from the faith, as Paul says, as the others departed from the faith into their own sect, as it were; but Mani departed from no sect, so that it could be said that he departed from the faith. Augustine said: Since I see that you are unwilling to answer what you are asked, lest you be found either not to hold the Holy Spirit, whom we have already proved was sent to the apostles, or not to be in the number of those whom Paul designated as to come, where he also prophesied of you yourselves, I answer briefly: so that I may take according to your understanding what you said, 'They shall depart from the faith, since none depart from the faith except those who were in some faith;'
but Mani was in no faith from which he could depart, but in the one in which he was, in that he remained,"—this I ask you: whether Mani, or rather the doctrine of the lying devils which was in Mani, has seduced no catholic Christians so as to make them depart from the faith. For if many are seduced by you and through you and through that doctrine, so as to depart from the faith and give heed to seducing spirits, such as was in Mani, and begin to say that all intercourse is fornication—whence the apostle says, 'forbidding to marry'—and begin to say that the flesh which men eat is not the creature of God, but the making of devils, and is uncleanness:
it is manifest that the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, who was in the apostle Paul, foretold concerning these that they would depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, such as was in Mani. Now therefore, since I have answered, it is just that you should answer what I asked: whether you do not say that all intercourse is fornication; or, if you are unwilling to answer even this, then answer that which I first asked, so as to prove that Mani is an apostle of Christ; or, if you are unwilling even for this, allow me to make void his doctrine, as I promised, when his epistle which you call 'of the Foundation' was being read. Felix said: And I answer to what your Holiness says, that the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, came in Paul. Augustine said:
Not in him alone. Felix said: I treat of him, because if in him, then in all... And if in him—for Paul in another epistle says: 'We know in part and we prophesy in part; but when that which is perfect has come, those things which are said in part shall be done away'—we, hearing Paul say this, Mani came with his preaching, and we received him according to what Christ said: 'I send you the Holy Spirit.' And Paul came and himself also said that he is to come, and afterward no one came; therefore we received Mani. And because Mani came and through his preaching taught us the beginning, the middle, and the end; he taught us about the fabric of the world, why it was made and from what it was made, and who made it;
he taught us why there is day and why there is night; he taught us about the course of the sun and moon: because we did not hear this in Paul nor in the writings of the other apostles, we believe this, that he himself is the Paraclete. And so I say again what I said above: if I hear in another Scripture, where the Paraclete speaks, that is, the Holy Spirit, concerning that about which I wish to inquire, and you teach me, I believe and renounce. Augustine said: You say that you therefore do not believe the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, was in the apostle Paul, because the apostle Paul said, 'For we know in part and we prophesy in part,' and from this you suppose that the apostle by these words foretold, as it were, that another was to come after him who would preach all the things which this one could not, because he spoke in part;
and this one you believe to be Mani. First, then, from the very reading of the apostle I will show why the apostle said this. Next, since you have said that Mani taught you the beginning, the middle, and the end, and how or why the world was made, about the course of the sun and moon and the other things you mentioned, it is not read in the Gospel that the Lord said: 'I send you the Paraclete, who shall teach you about the course of the sun and moon.' For he wished to make them Christians, not astronomers. It suffices that men should know of these matters, as far as they have learned in school, for human uses. But Christ said that the Paraclete would come, who would lead into all truth; but he did not there say: the beginning, the middle, and the end; he did not say: the course of the sun and moon.
But if you think that this doctrine pertains to that truth which Christ promised through the Holy Spirit, I ask you: how many are the stars? If you have received that Spirit of whom you speak, to whom it pertains to teach these things which I say do not pertain to Christian instruction and doctrine, then you ought to answer and reply to me. For you have made yourself a debtor, so that if I ask anything of such matters, and you do not answer, that Spirit does not appear in you, of whom it was said: 'He shall lead into all truth'—if that is the truth to which these things pertain.
Therefore choose for yourself which you wish, and be prepared to answer me concerning these matters as a man who has received the Spirit that leads into all truth, and who says that it pertains to that very truth to know these worldly things. And so I can tell you the things which pertain to Christian doctrine; but you, who think that it pertains to it how the world was made and what is done in the world, must answer me concerning all things. But plainly, when you have answered, you shall have to prove it. But before you begin to speak, in case perhaps you have something which he whom you followed fabricated, let me first teach what I promised, namely, why the apostle said: 'We know in part and we prophesy in part.'
For he said, as the reading itself will presently show, that while a man is in this life, he cannot attain to all things, but in this life attains in part; but the Holy Spirit himself, who in this life teaches in part, after this life will lead into all truth. And that this may be taught most plainly, hear the apostle. And when he had said this, he read from the apostle: But whether prophecies shall be done away, or tongues shall cease, or knowledge shall be done away; for we know in part and we prophesy in part; but when that which is perfect shall have come, that which is in part shall be done away. When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a man, I put away the things that were of a child.
For now we see through a mirror, in an enigma; but then face to face. And when he had read this, he said: Now tell me, if the apostle was foretelling the future times of Mani, whether you now see God face to face. Felix said: I cannot do so much against your power, for the rank of the episcopate is a wondrous power, and next against the laws of the emperor. And above I asked briefly, that you teach me what is truth; and if you teach me what is truth, it will be evident that what I hold is a lie. Augustine said: It has appeared that you could not prove that the apostle of Christ was Mani; and why you could not, I will briefly set forth.
You said that you proved Mani to be an apostle of Christ from this: that Christ promised the Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, was to come; and because you could not find, when he came, the one whom Christ promised, hence you believed that Mani himself was he. But when I proved through the holy, ecclesiastical, canonical Scriptures when the Holy Spirit came most manifestly, whom the Lord Christ promised would come, you turned yourself to say that it ought to be shown you what he taught, and whether he made void the doctrine of Mani.
When therefore I had answered that Mani was after the apostles in the flesh, but that their doctrine had been preached by them before Mani was born, I nevertheless said that one of those apostles, Paul, through the Holy Spirit who had come upon all the apostles, prophesied also concerning this doctrine of yours, that it was to come, and called it the doctrine of lying devils. Wherein I showed that the things which Paul said would be in that doctrine pertain to your profession, that is, the forbidding of marriage—since you say that all intercourse, even with a wife, is fornication—and abstinence from foods which God created—since I know that you call certain foods unclean, though he himself goes on and says:
'every creature of God is good'—when here I demanded of you that you answer, you said that Mani taught you the beginning, the middle, and the end, and the course of the sun and moon and other such things; and when I showed that these do not pertain to Christian doctrine, you answered that the apostle Paul himself said that he knows in part and prophesies in part. I said that we cannot know divine things while we are in this life, and that here we see through a mirror and in an enigma, but then face to face; and I asked of you, if you think the apostle Paul said this—that Mani was to come, who would teach what Paul could not—whether it pertains to you, who say that you have received that very Spirit, to see God now face to face. And since you cannot,
it is manifest that the apostle Paul spoke of that of which John also speaks: 'Beloved, we are the sons of God, and it does not yet appear what we shall be; but we know that when he shall appear, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.' When you had heard this, you said that you were not able to prevail against my power. Which is not my power, but if there is any, it was given to me by him for refuting errors—which is the power of all his faithful ones and of those who with full heart presume concerning themselves upon him.
You also said that the authority of the episcopate frightens you, when you see with how much peace we conduct ourselves among us, with how much tranquility we dispute, how the people here present offer you no violence, strike into you no terror, but most tranquilly listen, as befits Christians. You also said that you feared the laws of the emperor. This one whom the Holy Spirit filled would not fear for the true faith; for even Peter the apostle feared in the Lord's passion and thrice denied him; but where the Paraclete, whom Christ had promised, the Holy Spirit, filled him, he was crucified for the faith of the Lord; and he who first had the denial of fear, afterward fulfilled the most glorious passion of confession.
You therefore, from this very fact that you said you fear the laws of the emperor—although also from the other matters it is sufficiently apparent—show that you have not found the Paraclete, the Spirit of truth; for even if you did not fear, you would be convicted by the other matters. Felix said: The apostles also feared. Augustine said: They feared so as to be on their guard, not so as to hesitate to declare their faith when seized. You ought long ago to have feared on this account, so that we should not have found you here; now you are in the midst of it. Why do you fear, unless because you have nothing to say? For if you had feared the emperors, you would have kept silent beforehand.
nuncuerocumhesternodielibellumcuratoridederisetpubliceclamitaueriscumcodicibustuisteparatumesseincendi, siquidmaliinipsisfueritinuentum, undeherilegesflagitabasquasifortis, hodieueritatemfugisuttimidus? FEL. dixit: Nonueritatemfugio. AUG. dixit: Dicergo, siuidesdeumfacieadfaciemsecundumpolliciationemtuam, quiadixistiapostolumPaulumdeuobisdixisse, quiatamplenamueritatemaccepturiessetis, utintellegamusuelcredamusapostolumhabuisseexparteettetotum. FEL. dixit: Nonueritatemfugio, sedueritatemquaero. quodtudicis, quianonteneo, probeturmihiperscripturasdeificas . hocquaeroiam. . AUG. dixit:
But now, since yesterday you gave a petition to the curator and publicly cried out with your books that you were prepared to be burned, if anything evil should be found in them—whence yesterday you demanded the laws as though a brave man—today do you flee from the truth as a timid man? Felix said: I do not flee from the truth. Augustine said: Then say, if you see God face to face according to your promise—for you said that the apostle Paul spoke of you, that you were to receive so full a truth that we might understand or believe that the apostle had it in part and you the whole. Felix said: I do not flee from the truth, but I seek the truth. What you say that I do not hold, let it be proved to me through the divine Scriptures. This is what I now seek. Augustine said:
First profess that you could not prove that Mani is an apostle of Jesus Christ; and, as far as I shall be able, when all things contrary shall have been rooted out of your heart through my ministry, by the Lord's gift, I will graft into you what is the knowledge of the truth which leads to God, beginning from faith. Felix said: Since you say this—that I should deny my law and receive another, provided it be better, which is what I seek—I do not answer thus, so as to deny my law before I receive the other. Augustine said: But first that is poured out of a vessel which it holds contrary, and thus is filled up that which is good; or, if you still hesitate to pour out, defend that of which you are full.
For I will show you, as much as the Lord helps me, with how much uncleanness and blasphemies the doctrine of Mani is full, if you permit that epistle to be read, of whose beginning we have already treated, and you could not prove that Mani is an apostle of Christ. But for this reason you weave delays, lest the rest be read, where your sacrileges are openly detected; or, if you permit, let them be read. Felix said: I permit, since you said that all unclean things are poured out and thus good things are put in; for this was said by your Holiness. To which I too say: no one pours in water, unless another has emptied it. Augustine said: See how inconsiderately you have spoken, to speak more mildly and not say insanely. Surely I set before you the likeness from a vessel;
inuasplenumnemopotestaliquidmittere, nisifundaturillud, quoplenumerat. FEL. dixit: Unumdixistietegodixiduo. AUG. dixit: Siduouasadixisti, uisillumparemtuumfundimusetinplemusillum, utpossistufundere, quodhabes ? FEL. dixit: Ambounamaquamhabemus. AUG. dixit: Cumergoamboplenisitisaquauestra, quidinplebimus, utdoceamusuos, nisialiquisuestrumfuderit, quodhabet? autsibonumestetideodebetteneri, utdefendaturetlegaturillaepistula, uideamus, siuelceterapossuntdefendi, siinipsoinitiodefecisti; autsidicisteinillonondefecisse, probanobisquomodositManichaeusapostolusChristi. FEL. dixit:
into a full vessel no one can put anything, unless that with which it was full is poured out. Felix said: You said one, and I said two. Augustine said: If you said two vessels, do you wish that we empty your fellow vessel and fill it, so that you can pour out what you have? Felix said: We both have one water. Augustine said: Since therefore you are both full of your own water, what shall we fill, that we may teach you, unless one of you pours out what he has? Or, if it is good and therefore ought to be kept, so that that epistle may be defended and read, let us see whether the rest at least can be defended, if you have failed at its very beginning; or, if you say that you did not fail in it, prove to us how Mani is an apostle of Christ. Felix said:
Christusdixitspiritumsanctummissurumse, quiinomnemueritateminducat. AUG. dixit: Sihabesillum, adtende, quodteiamduduminterrogaui. dixistienimadipsiusdoctrinampertinereetiamistamundanacognoscere . dicmihi: quotsuntstellae, siintroductusesinistamomnemueritatem? FEL. dixit: Etegodico, quia, siparacletusperapostoloslocutusest, etperPaulum; etegopetosanctitatemtuam, utillamihiostendas, quaeiamdixi. AUG. dixit: Confiteretenonpotuisseostendere, quodegointerrogaui, etostendamsecundumscripturas, quodpertineatadfidemchristianam. FEL. dixit:
Christ said that he would send the Holy Spirit, who leads into all truth. Augustine said: If you have him, attend to what I asked you a while ago. For you said that to know these worldly things also pertains to his doctrine. Tell me: how many are the stars, if you have been led into that whole truth? Felix said: I too say that, if the Paraclete spoke through the apostles, then also through Paul; and I ask your Holiness to show me those things which I have already mentioned. Augustine said: Confess that you could not show what I asked, and I will show, according to the Scriptures, what pertains to the Christian faith. Felix said:
Etego, siad.tulerismihiscripturasManichaei, quinqueauctores, quostibidixi, quicquidmeinterrogaueris, probotibi. AUG. dixit: Deipsisquinqueauctoribusestistaepistula, cuiusaperuimusprincipiumetinuenimusibiscriptum: ManichaeusapostolusChristiIesu . etuideo, quiaipsumnonmihiprincipiumexponis, quianonprobas, quomodositManichaeusapostolusIesuChristi. FEL. dixit: Siinistanonprobo, insecundoprobo. AUG. dixit: Inquosecundo? FEL. dixit: InThesauro. AUG. dixit: Thesaurumistum, quemideotalinomineappellatis, utmiserosseducatis, quisscripsit ? Manichaeus . nolomihiabilloprobes: quiaipseManichaeusmentiturdicendoseesse, quodnonest. FEL.
And I too, if you bring me the Scriptures of Mani, the five authors whom I named to you, whatever you ask me, I will prove to you. Augustine said: Of those same five authors is this epistle, whose beginning we opened, and we found written there: 'Mani, an apostle of Christ Jesus.' And I see that you do not expound to me that very beginning, because you do not prove how Mani is an apostle of Jesus Christ. Felix said: If I do not prove it in this one, I prove it in the second. Augustine said: In what second? Felix said: In the Treasure. Augustine said: This 'Treasure,' which you call by such a name in order to seduce the wretched, who wrote it? Mani. I will not have you prove it to me from him: because Mani himself lies by saying that he is what he is not. Felix.
dixit: Tumihiprobaperalterum. AUG. dixit: Quiduistibiprobem? FEL. dixit: QuiamentiturManichaeus. AUG. dixit: QuiatunonpotesprobareuerumdicereManichaeum, oportet, utegoprobemmentitumManichaeumesse? FEL. dixit: Quarenonpotuiprobare? numquidprolataesuntscripturae, quasegopetiui, etnonprobaui? AUG. dixit: SedscripturasManichaeipetis, quibusfidemnonhabemus; aliundeproba. egoautemdeipsascripturaManichaeitibiprobomentitumesseManichaeumetblasphemasseManichaeum. FEL. dixit: Afferanturlibri. AUG. dixit: PraesensestepistulaManichaei, quamdicitisFundamenti. initiumnullumestinaedificio, nisifundamentum .
Said: Prove it to me through another. Augustine said: What do you wish me to prove to you? Felix said: That Mani lies. Augustine said: Since you cannot prove that Mani speaks the truth, is it necessary that I prove that Mani has lied? Felix said: Why could I not prove it? Were the Scriptures which I asked for brought forth, and did I not prove it? Augustine said: But you ask for the Scriptures of Mani, in which we place no faith; prove it from elsewhere. But I, from that very Scripture of Mani, prove to you that Mani lied and that Mani blasphemed. Felix said: Let the books be brought forth. Augustine said: The epistle of Mani which you call 'of the Foundation' is here present. There is no beginning in a building except the foundation.
sieumostenderoinipsofundamentoruinamfecisse, ceterameiusconstructionemutquidquaerimus? FEL. dixit: Hocdicisinipsamostendensruinamesse . etegodico, daarbitros, quantosettuhabes, ettibiprobo, quianonmentitur. AUG. dixit: Absitanobisetagenerehumano, utquantoshicuides, tantosuideasManichaeos. FEL. dixit : Da, dixi, quaeatepetiui. AUG. dixit: Quosuisergo, utdemtibi ? FEL. dixit: Quostuuolueris. AUG. dixit: Egoistosdo; sihabesmeliores, pete. FEL. dixit: Quomodoistosdas? AUG. dixit: Praesentes, quinosaudiunt. FEL. dixit: Istimihinonfauent. AUG. dixit: Ergotutalesquaeris, quitibifaueant, nonquiueritati ? FELdixit:
If I show that it made its ruin in the very foundation, why do we investigate the rest of its structure? FELIX said: You say this pointing out that the ruin is in the foundation itself; but I say, provide arbiters, as many as you too have, and I will prove to you that he does not lie. AUGUSTINE said: Far be it from us and from the human race that you should see as many Manichaeans as you see here. FELIX said: Provide, I said, what I asked of you. AUGUSTINE said: Whom then do you wish me to give you? FELIX said: Whomever you shall wish. AUGUSTINE said: I give these; if you have better ones, ask for them. FELIX said: How do you give these? AUGUSTINE said: Those present, who are listening to us. FELIX said: These do not favour me. AUGUSTINE said: So then you seek such men as favour you, not such as favour the truth? FELIX said:
Quimeaudiantetnontantumme, sedetipsamscripturam, utprobetur, anuerumdicit, anmentitur. AUG. dixit: Uidesergo, quiaaudiunt. legamuscetera, quiatuistamepistulamManichaeiesseconfessuses. FEL. dixit: Nonnego. AUG. dixit: Ergolegatur. FEL. dixit: Arbitrosnonhabeo. etadiecit: legaturcaputipsius. etcumlegereturetuentumessetadlocum, ubiscriptumhabeteademepistula: paxuobisinuisibilisetueritatisnotitiasitcumfratribussuisetcarissimis, quimandatiscaelestibuscreduntpariteratquedeseruiunt; sedetdexteraluministueatureteripiatuosabomniincursionemalignaetalaqueomundi;
Men who will hear me, and not only me, but also the Scripture itself, so that it may be tested whether he speaks the truth or lies. AUGUSTINE said: You see then that they are listening. Let us read the rest, since you have confessed that this letter is Manichaeus's. FELIX said: I do not deny it. AUGUSTINE said: Then let it be read. FELIX said: I have no arbiters. And he added: Let its heading be read. And when it was being read and they had come to the place where the same letter has written: "Peace to you, invisible peace, and may the knowledge of the truth be with his brethren and dearly beloved, who believe alike in the heavenly commandments and serve them; but also may the right hand of the light guard you and snatch you from every malignant assault and from the snare of the world;"
and may the piety of the Holy Spirit open the innermost recesses of your breast, that with your very eyes you may see your own souls" — Felix said: Give me a Scripture that refutes these things. AUGUSTINE said: As yet we have heard nothing evil, except that Manichaeus dared to call himself an apostle of Christ. For the things he said still pertain to the plaster of deceit and to the sheep's skin, whereby he first speaks good words to men, that he may be able to introduce evil ones. But let us see what he wishes to introduce through these words. For if he introduces something evil, then those words too will be evil and seductive; but if in what follows he says something good and true, we shall be compelled by necessity. Permit therefore the following to be read. FELIX said:
Siergoadseris, quiainprimobonaponunturetposteamalainmittuntur, quomodoegotibipossumcredere, cummihiprimobonadixeris? AUG. dixit: Egoadhucistanecbonadixinecmala. nihilmaliadhucaudiuimus, dixi; nondixi: iamaliquidboniaudiuimus. malumenimilludsolumdixi, quodaususestdicereseapostolumChristi. uerbauero, quaedixitinconsequentibus, tunceruntmala, simalialiquidintroduxerint; tunceruntbona, sibonialiquidintroduxerint. permitteergo, utsequentialegantur . quaretimes? FEL. dixit: Nontimeo. AUG. dixit: Permitteergo, utlegantur. FEL. dixit: Legantur. Etcumlegereturetuentumessetadlocum, ubiscriptumhabet:
If then you assert that good things are placed first and evil things are afterwards insinuated, how can I believe you, when you have first spoken good things to me? AUGUSTINE said: I have as yet called those things neither good nor evil. I said we have as yet heard nothing evil; I did not say: we have already heard something good. For the only evil thing I mentioned was that he dared to say he was an apostle of Christ. But the words he spoke in what follows will then be evil, if they introduce something evil; they will then be good, if they introduce something good. Permit therefore that the following be read. Why are you afraid? FELIX said: I am not afraid. AUGUSTINE said: Permit therefore that they be read. FELIX said: Let them be read. And when it was being read and they had come to the place where it has written:
itaautemfundatasunteiusdemsplendidissimaregnasuperlucidametbeatamterram, utanulloumquamautmoueriautconcutipossint, Augustinusdixit: Terramistamquamdicit, undehabebat? feciteam, angenuiteam, anaequalisetcoaeternaillierat? istamdicoterram, lucidametbeatamquamdicit. FEL. dixit: Quomodoscriptumest: inprincipiofecitdeuscaelumetterrametterraeratinuisibilisetcoinquinabilisetincomposita. egoitaintellego: inprincipiofecitdeuscaelumetterrametterraerat, quasiduaeterraemihiuidenturesse, secundumquodManichaeusdicitduoregna. AUG. dixit:
"And so the most splendid realms of the same one were founded upon the shining and blessed earth, so that they can never be moved or shaken by anyone" — Augustine said: This earth of which he speaks, whence did he have it? Did he make it, or beget it, or was it equal and coeternal with him? I mean this earth, the shining and blessed one of which he speaks. FELIX said: As it is written: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth, and the earth was invisible and defiled and unformed." I understand it thus: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth, and the earth was" — there seem to me to be, as it were, two earths, according to what Manichaeus says of two kingdoms. AUGUSTINE said:
Since you have cited our Scripture, which you are wont to blaspheme, it belongs to me to expound it and to show you that what is written is without blasphemy and in accord with truth, and not according to Manichaeus, so that then, at least in the second place, you may answer me what I asked. FELIX said: I answer. AUGUSTINE said: What is written, "In the beginning God made heaven and earth," the Scripture briefly comprehended what God had made. Then, because this earth which he had made did not yet appear before he distinguished and adorned it, of what sort of earth God had made, the following Scripture set forth what the earth was like, concerning which it had said: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth"; as though, when we had heard:
"In the beginning God made heaven and earth," we should ask, what sort of earth? — it subjoined and said: "But the earth," that is, that which God had made, "was invisible and unformed." It did not therefore speak of two earths, but set forth of what sort that one was. You therefore now answer me what I briefly asked: this shining and blessed earth of which Manichaeus speaks, upon which the realms of God were founded, was it made by God himself, or was it begotten of him, or was it coeternal with him? One of the three, if it is not troublesome, answer without evasion. FELIX said: The Scripture itself interprets itself. AUGUSTINE said:
If then you know there is here some place where Scripture says this, that God either begot that earth or made it or that it was coeternal with him, open to the place you know and read it to me. FELIX said: It is not in this Scripture, but in another. AUGUSTINE said: I believe then that, if there is any such Scripture, you remember what it said there. So then you answer me, you who know that Scripture; and if I say that it does not read so, you will convict me. But if I recognize that it is so, I argue according to that which you yourself have answered. Say therefore whether God made this earth, or begot it, or it was coeternal with him — you who have read in I know not what book where you say this is written. FELIX said:
Quiamodosanctitastuainterpretataestscripturamtuam, quomodouoluistietacceptaui, ettusicmihi . accepta, quicquiddixero. AUG. dixit: Interimquodinterrogaui, sinihilmecontramouerit, accepto; siautemaliquidmouerit, motummeumindicotibi, utadipsumrespondeas. FEL. dixit: Egononrespondiadtuadicta.- AUG. dixit: Quiapriusest, utmihiadid, quodinterrogaui, respondeas, tamenfecietiam, uttibipriorrespondeam . fortenontemouit; ideononrespondisti . forteetmenonmouebit, cumresponderis. respondeergoadquodinterrogaui. FEL. dixit: Respondeo. etadiecit:
Since just now your Holiness has interpreted your own Scripture as you wished, and I accepted it, so you too do the same for me: accept whatever I shall say. AUGUSTINE said: Meanwhile, as to what I asked, if nothing moves me against it, I accept; but if something moves me, I shall declare my difficulty to you, so that you may answer it. FELIX said: I have not answered your statements. AUGUSTINE said: Because the prior thing is that you should answer me as to what I asked, nevertheless I have arranged even to answer you first. Perhaps it did not move you; therefore you did not answer. Perhaps it will not move me either, when you have answered. Answer therefore what I asked. FELIX said: I answer. And he added:
dixistiergodeterrailla, inquadeushabetur, anfactaestabillo, angenerauitillam, ancoaeternailliest. etegodico, quia, quomododeusaeternusestetfacturaapudillumnullaest, totumaeternumest.. AUG. dixit: Nonillamergogenuitnequefecit? FEL. dixit: Non, sedestillicoaeterna. AUG. dixit: Siautemgenuissetillam, nonilliessetcoaeterna. FEL. dixit: Quodnascitur, finemhabet; quodinnatumest, nonhabetfinem. AUG. dixit: Quibusergoeratillepaterautcuiuseratpater, , quemmodopatremnominauit? sienimnihilgenuerat, pateressenonpoterat. FEL. dixit: Sedsuntalia, quaegenerauit. AUG. dixit:
You have therefore asked concerning that earth in which God is held, whether it was made by him, or he begot it, or it is coeternal with him. And I say that, just as God is eternal and there is with him nothing made, the whole is eternal. AUGUSTINE said: He neither begot it then nor made it? FELIX said: No, but it is coeternal with him. AUGUSTINE said: But if he had begotten it, it would not be coeternal with him. FELIX said: What is born has an end; what is unborn has no end. AUGUSTINE said: Of whom then was he the father, or whose father was he, whom just now you named father? For if he had begotten nothing, he could not be a father. FELIX said: But there are other things which he begot. AUGUSTINE said:
Illaergo, quaegenerauit, nonsuntillicoaeterna, anetipsacoaeternasunt? FEL. dixit: Coaeternasuntilliquicquiddeusgenerauit. AUG. dixit: Ergoerrasti, quodsuperiusdixisti: omnequodnascitur, finemhabet. FEL. dixit: Interim, quiasecundumgenerationemcarnislocutussum, erraui. AUG. dixit: Modestissimeconfessuserroremmerearisintellegereueritatem. FEL. dixit: Faciatdeus. AUG. dixit: Adtendeergoiam, utincipiascognoscereerroremscripturaehuius. siquaegenuitdeus, coaeternanonsuntilli, meliorestterrailla, quamnongenerauitdeus, ubihabitantomnia, quaegenerauitdeus; quamterramdicisabeonongeneratam. FEL. dixit:
Those things then which he begot, are they not coeternal with him, or are they too coeternal? FELIX said: Whatever God begot is coeternal with him. AUGUSTINE said: Then you erred in what you said above: everything that is born has an end. FELIX said: For the moment, I erred, because I spoke according to the generation of the flesh. AUGUSTINE said: Confessing your error most modestly, may you deserve to understand the truth. FELIX said: May God grant it. AUGUSTINE said: Attend then now, that you may begin to recognize the error of this Scripture. If the things which God begot are not coeternal with him, then that earth is better, which God did not beget, where dwell all the things which God begot — which earth you say was not begotten by him. FELIX said:
Coaequantursibiomnia, etquaegenerauitetquaenongenerauit, idestterrailla, ubicommorabatur. AUG. dixit: Quid? ipsequigenerauit, aequalisestillisomnibusautmaiorestillis ? FELdixit: Etquigenerauitetquosgenerauitetubipositisunt, omniaaequaliasunt. AUG. dixit: Uniusergosubstantiaesunt? FEL. dixit: Unius. AUG. dixit: Hocquodestdeuspater, hocsuntfiliiipsius, hocetterrailla? FELdixit: Hocunumsuntomnes. AUG. dixit: Huiusergoterraenonestpater, sedhabitator ? FEL. dixit: Etiam. AUG. dixit: Sinecgenuitillamnecfecitillam, quomodoadeumpertineatnisisolauicinitate, nonuideo, quomodosihabeataliquisuicinumbonum;
All things are equated to one another, both those he begot and those he did not beget, that is, that earth where he dwelt. AUGUSTINE said: What? Is he himself who begot equal to all those things, or greater than they? FELIX said: Both he who begot and those whom he begot and where they are placed — all are equal. AUGUSTINE said: They are then of one substance? FELIX said: Of one. AUGUSTINE said: What God the Father is, this his sons are, this that earth also is? FELIX said: These are all one. AUGUSTINE said: Of this earth then he is not the father, but the inhabitant? FELIX said: Even so. AUGUSTINE said: If he neither begot it nor made it, how it pertains to him except by mere neighbourhood I do not see — as if one has a good neighbour;
etduaeiameruntresambaeingenitae: terraetpater. .FEL. dixit: Immotressunt: pateringenitus, terraingenitaetaeringenitus.\'. AUG. dixit: Hoctotumunasubstantiaest? FEL. dixit: Una. AUG. dixit: Etitafundata, utanulloumquammoueriautconcutipossit? FEL. dixit: Motioetconcussiohabetdistantiam. AUG. dixit: Habeat; sedtamentaliafuerunt, utanulloumquammoueriautconcutipossent ? FEL. dixit: Estdistantiaintermouerietconcuti. AUG. dixit: Nonindeteinterrogo. FEL. dixit: Sedindemeuistenere. AUG. dixit: Quomodouis, accipe "moueri*nonpoteratmoueri ? FELdixit: Nondico, quianonpoteratmoueri, sedmotiodistantiaest. AUG. dixit: Seditadixi:
and there will then be two things both unbegotten: the earth and the father. FELIX said: Nay rather, there are three: the unbegotten father, the unbegotten earth, and the unbegotten air. AUGUSTINE said: Is this whole one substance? FELIX said: One. AUGUSTINE said: And so founded that it can never be moved or shaken by anyone? FELIX said: Motion and shaking have a difference. AUGUSTINE said: Let them have it; but nevertheless were they such that they could never be moved or shaken by anyone? FELIX said: There is a difference between being moved and being shaken. AUGUSTINE said: I do not ask you about that. FELIX said: But it is from that side that you wish to hold me. AUGUSTINE said: Take it however you wish — "it could not be moved"; could it be moved? FELIX said: I do not say that it could not be moved, but motion is a difference. AUGUSTINE said: But I said thus:
neither moved nor shaken; I did not say: it can indeed be moved, but cannot be shaken, or: it can indeed be shaken, but cannot be moved. But I spoke of both things: that they can neither be moved nor shaken. FELIX said: Concerning both things there is a difference between being moved and being shaken. AUGUSTINE said: Let us then read what follows; let us see whether that god, who had his realms founded upon the shining and blessed earth, which can never be moved or shaken by anyone, feared no one, as befitted, so that he feared no one whose realms were so founded that they could be neither moved nor shaken by anyone. And he read what followed: "But beside one part and side of that illustrious and holy earth." And when he read it, he asked: What side? The right or the left?
FEL. dixit: Hanctibiegononpossuminterpretariscripturametexponere, quodibinonest; ipsasibiinterpresest. egononpossumdicere, neforteincurraminpeccatum. AUG. dixit: Legaturergo, quodsequitur. etcumlegeretetuentumessetadlocum,. ubihabet: lucisuerobeatissimaepaterscienslabemmagnamacuastitatem, quaeextenebrissurgeret, aduersussuasanctainpenderesaecula, nisiquodeximiumacpraeclarumetuirtutepotensnumenobponat, quosuperetsimulacdestruatstirpemtenebrarum, quaextinctaperpetuaquieslucisincolispararetur, Augustinusdixit:
FELIX said: This Scripture I cannot interpret and expound to you, for what is not there; it is its own interpreter. I cannot say, lest perhaps I fall into sin. AUGUSTINE said: Then let what follows be read. And when he read it and had come to the place where it has: "But the father of the most blessed light, knowing the great ruin and devastation which would rise up from the darkness and was hanging over his holy realms, unless he should set against it some excellent and illustrious deity, mighty in power, whereby he might at once overcome and destroy the stock of the darkness, which being extinguished, perpetual rest might be prepared for the inhabitants of the light," Augustine said:
Now then, since open blasphemies have begun, if you think they should be defended, say what this race of darkness — which God seems to have feared, lest a great ruin and devastation from the darkness should burst into his realms — could do to harm God; especially since he said above that his realms were so founded that they could never be moved or shaken by anyone. What then was this race going to do to him? Could it harm him, or could it not? Answer one of the two. FELIX said: And I answer: if there is nothing against God, according to what the Scripture of Manichaeus said — that there is another kingdom — for what cause was Christ sent, to free us from the snare of this death? Whose is this snare and death? If there is no adversary against God, why have we been baptized?
Why the Eucharist, why Christianity, if there is nothing against God? AUGUSTINE said: Since I see that you are unwilling to answer what I ask you, and that you question me so that I may answer you — and this I do not refuse, provided you remember that I answer you when you question, whereas you have refused to answer me when I question — but since you have questioned me, hear what you have asked. We indeed say that Christ the Liberator has come, and we say that we are freed from our sins, because we are not begotten of the substance of God, but made by God through his Word. Now there is a great difference between what is born of the substance of God and what is made by God, which is not of the substance of God. Whatever therefore God has made can be mutable;
ipseautemdeusnonestmutabilis, quianonpossuntaequarioperaartificietconditori. tuautem, quipauloanteadinterrogationemmeamdixisti, quiaetpater, quigenerauitibilucisfilios, etaeretipsaterraetipsifiliiunasubstantiasuntetaequaliasuntomnia, oportet, utdicasmihi, huicsubstantiaeutiqueincorruptibiliquomodopoteratnoceregenstenebrarum. sienimpoteratnocereei, noneratnaturaincorruptibilis; siautemnonpoterat, nullacausaerat, quareproeliumagitaretetilludnumen, quoddicit, hucmitteret. FEL. dixit: Dilationempeto, utpossimrespondere. AUG. dixit: Quando? crasintermissussufficit? FEL. dixit:
but God himself is not mutable, because the works cannot be equal to the craftsman and founder. But you, who a little before said in answer to my question that both the father, who begot the sons of the light there, and the air and the earth itself and the sons themselves are of one substance and all are equal — it behoves you to tell me how the race of darkness could harm this substance, which is surely incorruptible. For if it could harm it, it was not an incorruptible nature; but if it could not, there was no cause why it should wage battle and send hither that deity of which he speaks. FELIX said: I ask for a postponement, that I may be able to answer. AUGUSTINE said: When? Is tomorrow's interval enough? FELIX said:
Intermittemihitresdies, idesthodieetcrasetperindieautusqueaddiem, quiestpostdominicum, idestpridieidusDecembris. AUG. dixit : Uideotedilationemadrespondendumpetisse; humanumest, utconcedaturtibi . sedsiresponderenonpotuerisadpraestitutumdiem, quidfiet? FEL. dixit: Erouictus. AUG. dixit: Quid? sifugeris. FEL. dixit: Reuserociuitatishuiusetubiqueetlegismeae. AUG. dixit: Immohocdic: sifugero, sichabear, tamquamsianathemaueroManichaeum. FEL. dixit: Hocdicerenonpossum. AUG. dixit: Ergoapertenobisdic, quiafugerecogitasetnemotetenet. FEL. dixit: Nonfugio. AUG. dixit: Utuideo, nonuisquasiuictusabscedere; sedsaltemhocdic:
Grant me three days, that is, today and tomorrow and the day after, or until the day which is after the Lord's Day, that is, the day before the Ides of December. AUGUSTINE said: I see you have asked for a postponement in order to answer; it is human that it be granted to you. But if you cannot answer by the appointed day, what shall be done? FELIX said: I shall be vanquished. AUGUSTINE said: What if you flee? FELIX said: I shall be guilty toward this city and everywhere and toward my law. AUGUSTINE said: Nay rather, say this: if I flee, let me be regarded as though I had anathematized Manichaeus. FELIX said: This I cannot say. AUGUSTINE said: Then say to us openly that you are thinking of fleeing and no one holds you. FELIX said: I do not flee. AUGUSTINE said: As I see, you do not wish to depart as though vanquished; but at least say this:
sifugero. uictussum. FEL. dixit: Dixi. AUG. dixit: Etundeadparebittefugisseproptergesta? FEL. dixit: lube, utquemelegero, cumipsosim. AUG. dixit: Eligetibialiquemdepraesentibusistisfratribus, quiadcancellumstant. ,FEL. dixit: Sedcumillo, quiestinmedio. AUG. dixit: Sicuttibielegisti, usqueaddiemcamilloeris. FEL. dixit: Etiam; etegohocconsentio. BONIFACIUSdixit: PraestabitChristus, utsicumilloueniam, christianusest. AugustinusepiscopusecclesiaecatholicaeHipponeregiensiumhisinecclesiacorampopulogestissubscripsi. Felixchristianus, cultorlegisManichaei, hisinecclesiacorampopulogestissubscripsi. LIBERSECUNDUS.
if I flee, I am vanquished. FELIX said: I have said it. AUGUSTINE said: And whence will it appear that you fled on account of the proceedings? FELIX said: Command that I may be with whomever I shall choose. AUGUSTINE said: Choose for yourself someone from these brethren here present who stand at the railing. FELIX said: But with him who is in the middle. AUGUSTINE said: As you have chosen for yourself, you shall be with him until the day. FELIX said: Even so; and I consent to this. BONIFACE said: Christ will grant that, if I come with him, he is a Christian. I, Augustine, bishop of the Catholic Church of Hippo Regius, have subscribed to these proceedings enacted in the church before the people. I, Felix, a Christian, a worshipper of the law of Manichaeus, have subscribed to these proceedings enacted in the church before the people. BOOK TWO.
When the appointed day had come, that is, the day before the Ides of December, the matter began to be conducted thus in the Church of Peace. AUGUSTINE, bishop of the Catholic Church of the regions of Hippo Regius, said: When we held our discussion a while ago, you remember that you asked for a postponement, since you could not answer at the moment the things I had asked. If then, in so wide a span of time, namely after the fifth day, you have thought out anything, answer. For this is what I asked then: if nothing could harm God, why did he wage war with the race which you call the race of darkness, in which war he mingled his own substance — which is that which he himself is — with the nature of the demons, as you said when questioned?
But if anything could harm him, you do not worship an incorruptible God, such as truth and apostolic doctrine attest. FELIX said: From the time I departed from your Holiness, that I might return on the appointed day to answer your questioning, whatever you should wish to ask, the day has come. And because I have had no Scripture in my hands, since they have not been restored to me, whence I might instruct myself — for no one goes forth to a contest unless he has first meditated, and no litigant can litigate without his documents — likewise I too cannot answer without my Scripture. AUGUSTINE said:
This evasion you have devised in so long a span of days, but it will be able to help you not at all, since in a lost cause and a sacrilegious error you have nothing to answer. For it is known to all who were present, whom I see present even now, that you asked only for a postponement of days, but that you ought also to have asked for the codices when you asked for the postponement, if you thought you could be instructed by them to answer — which you did not do. I know that you asked for the codices, not indeed to be inspected for instruction, but this was far before you asked for the postponement; when, however, you asked for the postponement, you made no mention of the codices being restored to you and inspected, that you might be better instructed. FELIX said:
Now I ask that the codices be restored to me, and I will come to the contest after two days; and if I am vanquished, I shall undergo whatever you shall have decided. AUGUSTINE said: I do not think you a novice in this wicked sect, which you also confess. But that you have nothing to answer, even if you do not confess it, every man already sees. But since you demand back your codices, which are kept under the public seal, and say that, having inspected them, you can come instructed after two days, recall this, which is now established, that you were not able to answer the questions put to you. But take your codices, and say what you wish to be produced from them, that you may now inspect and answer. FELIX said: All the Scriptures which have been taken from me.
For this is the Letter of the Foundation, as your Holiness well knows, and as I too have said, since it itself contains the beginning, the middle, and the end. Let it be read, and let whatever evil is charged against my law be proved; and I renounce it, if those crimes which are charged against my law shall have been proved. AUGUSTINE said: Since you confess this to be the letter wherein the beginning, middle, and end of your doctrine is contained, how sacrilegious this beginning is — where you say that God fought against the race of darkness and mingled his own part, which is that which he himself is, with the nature of the demons, to be polluted and bound — is so sacrilegious that it can scarcely be borne by those who hear it.
This is charged first against your sect — whether you call this the beginning, or the middle, or the end, I do not much care; yet you do not deny that this was read from this letter, which you confess to be Manichaeus's — this is charged against you; defend this, if you can, that we may come to other matters. Whence I ask again: if you worship an incorruptible God, what could some hostile race, which you imagine, harm him? If it could harm him nothing, there was no cause why he should mingle his own part with the nature of the demons; but if it could harm him, you do not worship an incorruptible God. FELIX said: Manichaeus says there are two natures, and now for that he is blamed, because he said there are two, a good and an evil. Christ in the Gospel says there are two trees:
a good tree never makes bad fruit, and a bad tree never makes good fruit. Behold two natures. Then in the Gospel it is written: "Did you not sow good seed in the field? Whence then have the tares appeared? This the enemy has done." This enemy, if he is not foreign to God, let it be proved to me; if this enemy pertains to God, what kind of seed did he sow? Again in the Gospel it is written, Christ saying that in the last times he will set his throne in the midst of the world and will send his angels into the east and the west, the north and the south, and will gather all nations before him and will separate them, as a shepherd separates the lambs from the kids. And, to speak briefly, to the lambs he will say:
Go into the kingdom which was prepared for you from the origin of the world. To the kids, who are on the left side, he will say: Depart from me, you who have worked iniquity; for you had my name, but you did not do the works; go into the eternal fire, which is prepared for the devil and his angels. Who are they who have the name of Christ and are sent into eternal fire with the devil and his angels, and to what part do these belong, with whom Christ is not mingled, and yet they bear his name? For this Manichaeus says, that those whom Christ condemns are not his. For Paul the Apostle says: the prudence of the flesh is an enemy to God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can it be. This Manichaeus says, that what is an enemy to God does not pertain to God;
but if it pertains to God, he has made an enemy for himself; this Manichaeus does not say. Again Paul says: the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, that they should not contemplate the brightness of the Gospel of Christ, who is the image of God. Paul himself again says: there was given to me a goad of my flesh, an angel of Satan, who buffets me day and night; wherefore I besought the Lord that it might depart from me. And he said to me: my grace is sufficient for you; for virtue is proved in weakness. Behold what the Apostle has said, behold what the Evangelist has said.
Since Manichaeus asserts this, that he is foreign to God who warred against God — whether because Christ was crucified, or because all the apostles were slain for the sake of God's command — this one who crucified them, whom the command of God does not please, let your Holiness tell me this, whether he pertains to God. AUGUSTINE said: You have wished to cite the holy Scriptures, from which, by not understanding them, you stray far from the truth, as though drawing from them a patronage for your idle talk.
Yet among all the things which you have cited — partly as they are truly written, partly otherwise than they are written — you have nowhere been able to show that God, wishing to repel a hostile nature threatening his realms, that he might have rest, mingled his own part, which is that which he himself is, with the contrary nature of the demons, and caused it to be bound by them and contaminated. But this is what is charged against you. Whence, not finding what to answer, you have cited chapters of the divine Scriptures, where it is said of sinners that they do not pertain to the blessed life which God grants to the good and faithful, and you have wished these to be taken as two natures, according to the ravings of Manichaeus.
But truth says that all those things which we see and which we do not see, which naturally subsist, were made by God; among which the rational creature also, whether in angels or in men, received free will: by which free will, if it should wish to serve God, according to the will and law of God it would have eternal felicity with him; but if it were unwilling to be subject to his law, but, using its own power, had acted against his command, according to his justice it would lie under the punishment due. This is the omnipotence of God in creating all things, this the justice in requiting sinners.
But behold, I prove free will, and that each one sins therefrom if he wills, does not sin if he does not will, not only in the divine Scriptures, which you do not understand, but even in the words of your own Manichaeus. For, hemmed in, he sees the power of truth, against which he had tried to bring in another nature, which God did not make, against God — not by solid truth, but by empty phantasm; yet, to confess the truth about free will, human nature, in which God made him, prevailed in him more than the sacrilegious fable which he himself devised for himself. Hear then about free will, first, the Lord himself, where he mentions the two trees, of which you yourself made mention; hear him saying:
Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad. When therefore he says "either do this or do that," he indicates power, not nature. For no one save God can make a tree; but each one has it in his will either to choose the things which are good and to be a good tree, or to choose the things which are evil and to be an evil tree — not because the evil things themselves which are chosen have any substance in themselves, but because God founded all the things which he established, founded them in their degrees and distinguished them by their kinds, heavenly and earthly, immortal and mortal, and founded all things good each in its own kind, and placed the soul having free will beneath himself and above the rest:
that if it should serve the higher, it might rule over the lower; but if it should offend the higher, it would feel punishment from the lower. This then the Lord, in saying "either do this or do that," showed that it was in their power what they should do, he himself being untroubled and certain in himself as God, and that if they chose the good, they would receive his reward, if they chose the evil, they would feel his punishment; but he is always just, either as rewarder or as condemner. Hear then now how Manichaeus himself — so perverse, so proud that, introducing another nature and making it equal to God, he would degrade God down to himself — nevertheless confessed that there is free will.
In your Treasure, to which you have given such a name to deceive men, he certainly speaks thus, as you yourself know: "But those who by their own negligence have by no means permitted themselves to be purged from the corruption of the aforesaid spirits, and have too little obeyed the divine commandments in their integrity, and have refused to keep more fully the law given to them by their liberator, and have not governed themselves as was fitting," and the rest. You see that in these words free will is confirmed even by one who did not know what he was saying. For he who is unwilling to keep the law, it is in his power to do so, if he will. For he did not say: they could not, but: they were unwilling. This surely, that they are unwilling to keep the law, they are not compelled by the race of darkness; for if they are compelled, they are not unwilling, but they are unable;
but if they are unwilling, they are surely not compelled not to do it, but by their own will they are unwilling. This then, which is in their will, that they are unwilling, is surely sin without any necessity of the race of darkness; recognize this to be sin without the necessity of the race of darkness. And thence you see whence come all faults, whence the deserts of faults, whence the distributions of punishments. You have this also in the apocryphal Scriptures, which the Catholic canon indeed does not admit, but which are so much the more pleasing to you as they are excluded from the Catholic canon. Let me also cite something thence, by whose authority I am not held, but you are convicted. In the Acts written by Leucius, which he writes as though the Acts of the Apostles, you have it thus set down:
For indeed specious fabrications and feigned ostentation and the compulsion of visible things do not proceed from their own nature, but from that man who through his own self was made worse through seduction. See how here he said both "through his own self" and "through seduction." For the devil was the seducer of man, not a sinner by nature, but a sinner first by will. But because it was in man's power not to consent to the seducer, therefore both "through his own self" and "through seduction" were set down, so that in what is set down "through his own self" you may understand free will, and in what is set down "through seduction" you may understand the devil, not the oppressor of the unwilling, but the tempter of the willing.
Accordingly, since I have answered and, as far as I could, proved that the things written in the holy books concerning sinners and the just pertain not to a diversity of natures, but to a distinction of deserts — in which deserts it is not nature that makes necessity, but will that makes the fault — do you answer to that which I have already asked: if nothing could harm God, why did he mingle his own part, his own substance, that which he himself is, with the demons to be polluted and bound — which you could not find in any canonical divine Scripture; but if it could harm him, you do not worship an incorruptible God, of whom the Apostle says: but to the King of the ages, immortal, invisible, incorruptible, to God alone, be honour and glory forever and ever.
Then likewise he says: God dwells in unapproachable light. Do the saints not approach that light, of whom it is written: "Come to him and be enlightened"? Do the saints not approach that light, of whom it is said: "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God"? But because none can approach it, save he to whom God himself has granted that he may approach, therefore in itself it is unapproachable. For no one can approach it whom God has not willed to approach; but to whom he has granted, that one will approach. How then could that race of darkness approach the dwelling of God, where the light is unapproachable, to which none approaches, save he to whom God has granted?
Or if he had received a gift from God enabling him to advance, he would not have surrendered to the assaulting of the kingdom of God, nor would he have been afraid. But if He had given no such gift by which he might advance, then, dwelling secure in His own kingdom, inhabiting light inaccessible, what could He fear from the race of darkness, that He should mingle with it His own portion, His own substance, that which He Himself is — to be bound, to be pressed down, to be defiled, where it would not only be held wretchedly, but even be purged shamefully?
For you say that it is purged there — a thing it is unlawful even to hear, yet for your confounding and perhaps your salvation we cannot keep silent — you say that God's portion is purged there, in the ship of light which you call the sun, thereby doing injury to the Creator of the sun and to the sun itself, which you say was made in such a way that so great a foulness should be enacted there. For you say that God, set there, turns His powers into males to inflame the lusts of the female demons, and turns those same powers again into females to inflame the lusts of the male demons; so that, when they cast lust upon the demons who are kindled toward the forms fashioned by God, the members of those demons are relaxed, and thus the portion of God which had been bound up there escapes.
So great a reproach, so great a sacrilege you have dared to believe, and you do not hesitate to preach it. These are the middle parts of your doctrine. But what is the end? What, except that God could not purge the whole? And because He could not, you say He will make it, as it were, a plastering over the race of darkness, so that there may be damned forever what could not be purged and committed no fault of its own accord. So it comes about that your God — not the true one, but a fabricated one, not established anywhere, but imagined in your own heart — mingles His portion unhappily, purges it shamefully, and damns it cruelly. Answer, then, to these things, and begin with what I have said: why did God mingle that portion of His, to which nothing could do harm? Or if it could be harmed, how can He be incorruptible? FELIX
dixit: CrudelemadseritisManichaeumhaecdicentem; deChristoquiddicimus, quidixit: iteinignemaeternum? AUG, dixit: Peccatoribushocdixit. FEL. dixit: Istipeccatoresquarenonpurgatisunt? AU6. dixit: Quianoluerunt. FEL. dixit: Quianoluerunt. hocdixisti? . AUG. dixit: Hocdixi, quianoluerunt. FEL. dixit: Quarenoluerunt? est, quinonuultcurari? est, quinonuultpurgari ? est, quinonuultinluminari ? quiainfirmusest, quinonuultadsanitatemuenire? sicrudeleest, quodManichaeusdicit, quiaaliquaparsdei, quaesepurgarenonpotuit. ingloboligataest, hoccrudelenonest, utChristus, quidixit:
He said: You assert that Mani is cruel for saying these things; but what do we say of Christ, who said, 'Go into the eternal fire'? AUGUSTINE said: He said this to sinners. FELIX said: Why were these sinners not purged? AUGUSTINE said: Because they were unwilling. FELIX said: 'Because they were unwilling' — did you say this? AUGUSTINE said: I did say it — because they were unwilling. FELIX said: Why were they unwilling? Is there anyone who does not wish to be healed? Is there anyone who does not wish to be purged? Is there anyone who does not wish to be enlightened? Is he weak who does not wish to come to health? If what Mani says is cruel — that some portion of God, which could not purge itself, has been bound in the mass — is this not cruel, that Christ, who said…
'I came for the sake of sinners' — and yet now sends them into eternal fire, though they bore His name? But, I suppose, they could not fulfill the commandments. If this is cruel, that too is more cruel; and if that is more cruel — namely, that God could not purge them and bound them in the mass — then this also seems more cruel: that Christ, being unable to purge them, sends them into eternal fire. Let your Holiness expound this to me concerning that very cruelty. AUGUSTINE said: If you had either understood what I have already said, or would admit that you understand it — for perhaps, having nothing to say, you have feigned not to understand what is plain — you would not say these things. For we have already said and proved through the divine Scriptures that there is free will;
and that God is the just judge of free will, the rewarder of the faithful and of those who submit to Him and are willing to be healed, but the condemner of the proud and the ungodly. Since, therefore, He came to heal sinners, He surely heals those who confess their sins, He heals the penitent; but no one repents when another has sinned — rather, if the repentance is just and true — whence the Lord Himself says: 'I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.' This very repentance shows that whatever we may sin belongs not to an alien nature, but to our own will. For if one man repents when another sins, that is not prudent but insane repentance. But according to you there are no sins at all; for the race of darkness does not sin, because it acts according to its own nature;
and the nature of light does not sin, because what it does, it is compelled to do. Therefore you find no sin which God may condemn, you find no sin which repentance can heal. But if there is repentance, there is also fault; if there is fault, there is also will; if there is will in sinning, there is no nature compelling it. Yet if those who cannot fulfill what they will suffer some infirmity — whence the Apostle says: 'I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members' — it is manifest that this has come from the transmitted stock of the first sin of Adam, and from evil habit.
For even today men form habits by free will, and once they have formed them, they cannot easily overcome them; they themselves, therefore, have brought it upon themselves that the law dwells against them in their members. But those who conceive the fear of God and through free will submit themselves to the best physician to be healed, and as to a good healer, so also to a merciful Creator, are healed through the humility of confession and of repentance. The proud, however, saying that they are righteous, or saying that it is not they themselves who sin, but something else in them and another nature that sins out of them — by their very pride become both incurable and experience the just judgment of God, who resists the proud but gives grace to the humble. It is not unfitting, therefore, that God should say:
'Go into the eternal fire' to those who have spurned His mercy through free will, and to say, 'Come, blessed of my Father, receive the kingdom' to those who through free will have received His faith, have confessed their sins, have done penance, have been displeased with themselves as they were, and have pleased Him as they were made to be through Him. You, therefore, now answer to what I asked — but let me obtain this from you, that we make no superfluous delays —: if nothing could harm God, why did He send us here? If it could harm Him, God is not incorruptible. FELIX said: If nothing could harm God, why did He send His Son here? AUGUSTINE said: See how you are always asking questions and are unwilling to answer what is asked.
Hear what you have asked — yet remember that you do not answer what I say, while I do answer. Nothing can harm God; but He sent His Son to be clothed in flesh and to appear to men, to heal sinners, and in that very flesh to suffer for us, which flesh He took from us. For in His own nature He could suffer nothing, because 'in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.' In this nature, since the Word was God, He could suffer nothing. But that He might be able to suffer for us, 'the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.' The Word was made flesh by taking flesh, not by being changed into flesh; for He assumed humanity, He did not lose divinity.
And so the same is God and the same is man: in the nature of God equal to the Father, in the nature of man made mortal; among us, for us, from us; remaining what He was, taking up what He was not, that He might free what He had made, not what He was. The passion of Christ, therefore, is not from need, but from mercy. For He offered us an example of patience out of ourselves — that is, to man out of man, to flesh out of flesh; yet He Himself was not made worse in that flesh, but the flesh was made better in Him. But the portion of your god, having taken up no flesh — for there was none in the race of darkness for whom He might suffer — descended in order to be held, to be bound, to be defiled, and to be purged more foully than it was bound. For I have already spoken of its purging.
All these things, the more unworthy they are, the easier they are certainly to understand, since they do not fall upon the nature of God. And far be it from a pious and faithful soul to believe such things about God — about the good God, the true God — as you believe: not the God you have found, but the one you have fabricated. Answer now: if nothing could harm God, since that pure substance of His, having taken up no flesh, was going to suffer nothing in itself — if it was going to suffer anything, not in the flesh which it had not taken up — why was it sent here according to your empty babblings? FELIX said: If nothing could be harmed in God by the adverse party, and nothing could be harmed in Christ by the adverse nature, to which Christ came to free it? For, as you say, He came for the sake of our liberty. Therefore we were in captivity.
If we were held in captivity, and Christ came for that reason, to free us — then he who held us in captivity was either a stranger to God, or a power of God. If it was a power of God who held us, why did that same one who held us send Christ? If it lay in his own choice to release us whenever he wished, why is Christ crucified? For it is hidden from no one that Christ was crucified. Why did they crucify Him? If it is a power of God, it did us no harm. If it was a power of God, we were not captives with him, but rather, as it were, we with our own prince, as a son with his parents, and not as Romans with barbarians. It was not fitting, therefore — since we were established with the power of God — for God to send His Son, so that it might be said that our liberator has come.
If, then, it appears that we were established with the power of God, the Apostle said: 'Christ has freed us from the curse of the law, for it is written: Cursed is everyone who hangs upon a tree.' For this the Apostle says. If this one who curses all who hang upon a tree is the power of God — for Christ hung upon a tree, and all His apostles, who were given over for His precept's sake — who then is this one who curses everyone who hangs upon a tree? AUGUSTINE said: Those whom Christ redeemed from the devil were held by the devil through their own consent, and had been placed under his condition by the just judgment of God, to whose seduction they had consented through free will.
But just as it lay in man's power to consent to the devil, so that he might be taken captive, so it lay in the devil's own power, when he was an angel, to sin, so that he might be changed into something worse. The angel, therefore, having become a sinner through free will, persuaded to sin the man who had free will; so that the devil, if he had not willed, would not have sinned, and the man, if he had not willed, would not have consented. But once he was now held by the one to whom he had consented, it was not because the devil had any power of his own, but because it was the just judgment of God to give into the devil's power the man who despised the power of God over himself and would not obey His law:
since, therefore, Christ thus found sinners under sin — sin being in the free will — finding sinners under sin, He redeemed those who confessed from the one who was exalting himself. But as to what is set down in the law, 'Cursed is everyone who hangs upon a tree,' whence the Apostle says, 'Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us; for it is written: Cursed is everyone who hangs upon a tree' — he does not reproach the law, but commends the mercy of the Lord. For because Adam had sinned, and all that mass and offspring of sin was accursed, but the Lord willed to take flesh from that same mass, so that by taking up mortality, which had come from punishment, He might loose death — a thing which came from grace — therefore the law says:
'Cursed is everyone who hangs upon a tree.' For death itself hung upon the tree, that death which came from the curse. As, therefore, by taking up death He slew death, so by taking up the curse He loosed the curse. Whence also the Apostle says: 'Knowing that our old man was crucified together with Him' — because from our old man, that is, from the lot of death which came by the desert of sin, He deigned to take up mortal flesh from the Virgin Mary, in which He might offer us an example both of passion and of resurrection — of passion to strengthen patience, of resurrection to arouse hope — that He might show us two lives in the flesh which He took up from our mortal life: the one toilsome, the other blessed;
the toilsome, which we must endure; the blessed, which we must hope for. But we endure the toilsome by the desert of our own sin; He, however, displayed it in His flesh, not by the desert of any iniquity of His own, but by the office of His mercy. For, that you may know the law to be good, which you wished to reproach, the Apostle Paul himself said in a certain place: 'The law entered in, that sin might abound.' Still he seems to reproach it; but hear what follows: 'But where,' he says, 'sin abounded, grace did much more abound.' For the law was given to proud men who attributed everything to their own strength, so that, since they could not fulfill the law that was given, they might be found transgressors, and having become guilty under the law, might beg mercy from the Author of the law.
Accordingly, a little later the same Apostle says: 'And so the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good.' But lest you say that he is speaking of some other commandment, in order to show that he is speaking of that of which he had said shortly before, 'The law entered in that sin might abound,' he at once posed a question to himself: 'Did then that which is good become death to me? God forbid; but sin, that it might appear sin, worked death in me through that which is good.' For there was sin, but sin did not appear; the law was given to the proud man, he acted against the law, and the sin which existed but did not appear became apparent. But sin becoming apparent humbled the proud man; the proud man being humbled became penitent; from penitence mercy was obtained.
You have heard, then, what you asked; now answer what I ask: Could the race of darkness do no harm to God? Why did He send His portion here to be mingled and defiled by the nature of demons? FELIX said: If we are in our own choice, let no one compel anyone; whenever I wish, I shall be a Christian. It lies subject to our will either to be a Christian or not to be. AUGUSTINE said: Since the will lies at hand for us, this too is manifest, and I have taught it from the divine Scriptures; a thing which even he who led you into this error was compelled to say, even against his will. But as to what you say — 'let no one be compelled; whenever I wish, I shall be a Christian' — plainly no one compels you; whenever you wish, so be it, since it was of your own will that you came here and of your own will that you disputed these things.
And woe to the evil will, if it is evil; peace to the good will, if it is good. For whether it be evil or good, it is will. A crown follows the good will, punishment follows the evil will. God is the judge of wills, but the Creator of natures. If, therefore, you think you are compelled to be a Christian, hear from us that you are by no means compelled. Rather consider what you hear, weigh it well; you are in your own will. Examine it as a prudent man — if indeed there is in you any prudence, even human — whether the things that have been said are supported by truth, whether you yourself have failed in the defense of your Mani, as appears; and whenever you wish, be what you are not yet, and cease to be what you are. FELIX said:
Behold, now briefly, as your Holiness said, lest we heap up pages: if it pleases you — the thing I asked for before — come here; show me the truth, so that what I hold may be shown not to be truth, and you have me ready to believe. AUGUSTINE said: Indeed, that what you hold is not truth is already sufficiently apparent. For far be it from the hearts of those who seek or hold truth to believe that God, compelled by necessity, plunged His own substance into the nature of demons to be bound and defiled; far be it from the faithful to believe that God, to free His own substance, turned Himself into males against females and into females against males, to provoke their lust;
far be it from the faithful to believe that God afterward damns forever His own substance, which He Himself plunged into the demons. Because this, then, is not truth, it is manifest. But since you wish the truth to be laid open to you in place of this falsehood, now expelled and refuted, if anything concerning the knowledge of the catholic faith still moves you, you can be instructed from the beginning of faith. For pious faith makes one fit for the perception of unchangeable truth; and whoever is unwilling to begin from this faith will remain outside in his pride, and cannot be led to that toward which he strives or wishes to arrive. But since that falsehood is now manifest, anathematize the falsehood, so that you may begin to be fit for knowing the truth. FELIX said: When it becomes apparent to me;
quiamihinonadparet, quiaalteramihinonostensaest, nonpossumanathemare. AUG. dixit: Anathemandusesterror, quidicitcorruptibilemdeum, annonestanathemandus ? FEL. dixit: Iterumdic. AUG. dixit: Anathemandusesterror, quidicitcorruptibilemdeum, annonestanathemandus ? FEL. dixit: Quaeratur, sidicit. AUG. dixit: Egohocinterrogaui: quidicitcorruptibilemdeum, anathemandusest, annon ? FEL. dixit: Quidicitcorruptibilemdeum, anathemandusest . hocmihiobicis? AUG. dixit: Hocinterrogo. FEL. dixit: Corruptibilemdeumdicis, nonautemquodprimodixisti, quiapartemsuamdeditaduersariis ? AUG. dixit: Interimquodinterrogoresponde:
since it is not apparent to me, since the other has not been shown to me, I cannot anathematize. AUGUSTINE said: Is the error to be anathematized which says that God is corruptible, or is it not to be anathematized? FELIX said: Say it again. AUGUSTINE said: Is the error to be anathematized which says that God is corruptible, or is it not to be anathematized? FELIX said: Let it be inquired whether he says so. AUGUSTINE said: I asked this: whoever says that God is corruptible, is he to be anathematized, or not? FELIX said: Whoever says that God is corruptible is to be anathematized. Do you cast this at me? AUGUSTINE said: This I ask. FELIX said: You say that God is corruptible — not, however, what you first said, that He gave His portion to the adversaries? AUGUSTINE said: For the meantime, answer what I ask:
quidicitcorruptibilemdeumesse, anathemandusest, annon? FEL. dixit: Ualde. AUG. dixit: Quidicitcorruptibilemessenaturametsubstantiamdei, anathemandusest, annon ? FEL. dixit: Nonintellexi, quoddixisti. AUG. dixit: Hocdico, quodomnishomointellegit, quinonsefingitnonintellegere: naturametsubstantiamdei, idestilludipsum, quicquidestdeus, quidicitcorruptibilemesse, anathemandusest, annon ? FEL. dixit: Etiamanathemandusest. siprobatumfueritesseuerum. AUG. dixit: Nondumtibidixi. quiaManichaeusdicitcorruptibilemnaturamdei: sedhoctibidixi, quiaquicumquehocdicit, anathemandusestFEL. dixit: Etegorespondi: etiam. AUG. dixit:
Whoever says that God is corruptible, is he to be anathematized, or not? FELIX said: Very much so. AUGUSTINE said: Whoever says that the nature and substance of God is corruptible, is he to be anathematized, or not? FELIX said: I did not understand what you said. AUGUSTINE said: I say this, which every man understands who does not pretend not to understand: whoever says that the nature and substance of God — that is, that very thing, whatever God is — is corruptible, is he to be anathematized, or not? FELIX said: He too is to be anathematized, if it shall have been proved to be true. AUGUSTINE said: I have not yet told you that Mani says the nature of God is corruptible; but I told you this, that whoever says this is to be anathematized. FELIX said: And I answered: yes, he too. AUGUSTINE said:
Parsilla, quaemixtaestgentitenebrarum, dedeinaturaest, andealiaaliquanatura? FEL. dixit: Dedei. AUG. dixit: Quoddedeinaturaest, hocest, quoddeusest, analiudquid. quodnonestdeus? FELdixit: Itaest . quoddedeoest. deusest, secundumquodetscriptumest: luxlucetintenebrisettenebraeeamnonconprehenderunt; deusenimlumenestettenebraeineononsunt. AUG. dixit: Benerespondisti, quiaetquicquiddedeinaturaest, deusestetdeusluxestettenebraeineononsunt; ettalisluxluxitintenebrisettenebraeeamnonconprehenderunt.
That portion which was mingled with the race of darkness — is it of the nature of God, or of some other nature? FELIX said: Of God. AUGUSTINE said: That which is of the nature of God — is it that which God is, or something else which is not God? FELIX said: So it is: that which is of God is God, according as it is also written: 'The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it'; for 'God is light, and in Him is no darkness.' AUGUSTINE said: You have answered well, that whatever is of the nature of God is God, and God is light, and in Him is no darkness; and such a light shone in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
Let us see, then, whether Mani does not say that a portion of God was comprehended by the darkness, and even held bound, and even stained and defiled, so as to need the mercy of a liberator and purger. But if he says these things, then according to you and according to your true confessions he is to be anathematized, because he says that a portion of God and the nature of God, which is God Himself, was comprehended by the darkness and bound and defiled — a thing which you yourself, speaking according to the Gospel, could not say; but you spoke truly, that the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. Mani, therefore, is to be anathematized, who said that the light was darkened in the darkness and the darkness comprehended it. FELIX said:
But both he who is defiled and he who is held is set free; and we too, if we are defiled, are cleansed. AUGUSTINE said: But this is not rightly said of the nature of God. Of that which can be defiled, it is rightly said that it is defiled and cleansed; but of that which cannot be defiled, you see with how great a sacrilege it is said that it is defiled and cleansed — especially because you say in this way that a certain portion of God is defiled, so that on that account it is bound forever in the mass of darkness, because it could not be cleansed. Whoever does not anathematize this answered falsely a little while ago, that everyone who says God is corruptible is to be anathematized. FELIX said: This which your Holiness said, that the portion which did not cleanse itself from the contamination of the race of darkness…
etsicdicitManichaeus, quianonsuntmissiinregnumdei. hocenimadseristu, quiadamnatisunt; sedManichaeushocdicit, quianondamnatisunt, sedadcustodiampositisuntilliusgentistenebrarum. - AUG. dixit: Deistapartetecumago, quamdicispollutampurgari: postea, siopusfuerit, deilla, quaefigituringloboeius. interimquaepurgatur, pollutaerat. FEL. dixit: Quaepolluitur, etmundatur. AUG. dixit: Quiergodicitnaturamdeietsubstantiamdeietidquoddeusest, possepollui, ligari, inquinariagentetenebrarum, nonestanathemandus ? FEL. dixit: Christusundenosmundauit ? undenosliberauit ? AUG. dixit:
and thus Mani says that they are not sent into the kingdom of God. For you assert this, that they are damned; but Mani says this, that they are not damned, but are placed as a guard over that race of darkness. AUGUSTINE said: About that portion I deal with you, which you say, being defiled, is purged: afterward, if it be necessary, about that which is fixed in his mass. Meanwhile, that which is purged was defiled. FELIX said: That which is defiled is also cleansed. AUGUSTINE said: Whoever, then, says that the nature of God and the substance of God and that which God is can be defiled, bound, polluted by the race of darkness — is he not to be anathematized? FELIX said: Whence did Christ cleanse us? Whence did He free us? AUGUSTINE said:
Christ freed not a portion of God, not the nature of God, but the creature which He made, falling into sin through free will — He freed it by His mercy. He cleansed that thing which could be defiled, He freed that thing which could be taken captive, He healed that thing which could be made infirm. But now we are speaking of God, of the nature of God, of the substance of God, of that which God is: could it be defiled, or could it not? FELIX said: Our soul is from God. Is it that which was defiled? If it is not from God, why was Christ crucified for it? If, therefore, it is evident that Christ was crucified for the sake of our soul, it is evident that it is from God and was defiled and He cleansed it. AUGUSTINE said:
I say that not only the soul, but also our body and every creature, both spiritual and corporeal, is from God, because this the catholic faith holds. But one thing is what God begot of Himself, which is that which He Himself is; another thing is what God made. What God begot is equal to the Father; what God made — the thing created is not equal to the Creator. But we say that one thing is from God in such a way that it is better said to be of God, because it is that which He Himself is, as the only-begotten Son, as His Word, through whom all things were made; while other things we say to be from God in this way, because 'He spoke, and they were made; He commanded, and they were created.' Hence is the soul, from among the things which God made, not that which God begot of Himself.
Therefore the Word, which He begot of Himself, could not, cannot, and will not be able to be defiled. But the soul, which He made as ruler of the body, that it should serve the higher and rule the lower — that is, serve God and rule the body — having despised the law of God, was defiled through sin. But God, showing mercy to the things He made, sent His Son, through whom He made them, and through Him remade them. When that which was not had to be created, it was created through the Word; when that which had been made and corrupted had to be remade, a creature was taken up from thence from the Virgin Mary, so that through that which was man, it might be shown to man both what must be endured and what must be hoped for.
And so the nature of the Word, the substance of the only-begotten Son of God, suffered nothing either from the persecuting Jews or from the devil, the evil angel who persecuted Him. But because He clothed Himself with flesh, He clothed Himself with a mortal thing, a passible thing, a mutable thing: in that which He put on, He suffered whatever He willed, as an example of patience, and reformed this as an example of righteousness. Now do you tell me concerning the portion of God, that which God is, whether it can be defiled, or not. If it can, God is not immutable, and whoever says this is to be anathematized. But if it cannot, you see that Mani is to be anathematized, who says that a portion of God, the nature of God, that which is God, came here pure to the race of darkness, bound and defiled, so as to need to be loosed and cleansed. FELIX said:
Hoctudixistideanima, quiaexdeononest? AUG. dixit: Nondixi; seddixi, quiaexdeoest, tamquamadeofacta, nontamquamdedeonata. FEL. dixit: Dixistideanima, quianonestexdeo, sedfacturadei, quiasinedeonihilest; hocenimdicistuetnonuisadseuerare, quiaexdeoestanima. AUG. dixit: Adeoest, sedfactaadeo. FEL. dixit: Autfactaautmissaautdata, exdeoest. ergosiexdeoestetpollutaestetuenitChristusliberareeamdepollutione, quidculpasManichaeum ? AUG. dixit: Quiaegodicoanimamnonnaturamdei, sedfactamadeoperliberumarbitriumpeccasseetpeccatoessepollutametperdeimisericordiaminpaenitentialiberatam; tuautemipsamnaturamdei.
Did you say this about the soul, that it is not from God? AUGUSTINE said: I did not say it; but I said that it is from God, as made by God, not as born of God. FELIX said: You said about the soul that it is not from God, but a creature of God, since without God it is nothing; for this you say and are unwilling to affirm that the soul is from God. AUGUSTINE said: It is from God, but made by God. FELIX said: Whether made or sent or given, it is from God. Therefore, if it is from God and was defiled, and Christ came to free it from defilement, why do you blame Mani? AUGUSTINE said: Because I say that the soul is not the nature of God, but made by God, and that it sinned through free will and was defiled by sin and through God's mercy was freed in penitence; but you say that it is the very nature of God…
— that which God is; you say that God-from-God was captured and defiled in the race of darkness. And there is a great difference between that which God begot of Himself and that which He made not of Himself, but out of nothing — that is, when it was not at all, it received from God that it should be, that is, that it should be established. FELIX said: Therefore it is a portion of God. AUGUSTINE said: It has already been told you: it is not a portion of God; and receive how you may understand God the omnipotent maker. All things that are made, and whatever anyone makes, are either of himself, or out of something, or out of nothing. Man, because he is not omnipotent, makes a son of himself, and makes out of something — as the craftsman a chest out of wood, a little vessel out of silver. For he could make the vessel, but he could not make the silver; he could make the chest, but he could not make the wood.
But out of nothing — out of that which utterly is not — to make something be, no man can. But God, because He is omnipotent, both begot a Son of Himself, and made the world out of nothing, and formed man out of the clay, so that through these three powers He might show His efficacy prevailing over all things. For what He made of Himself is not to be said to have been made, but begotten. But what He made out of something — as man out of earth — He did not make man out of earth in such a way that another had made for Him the earth itself out of which He might make man, as God made silver for the silversmith out of which to make a little vessel; rather He Himself made both that which was not, that it should be, and that which should thence exist, which He had already Himself created out of nothing, that it should be.
Thus, then, is the body, thus the soul, thus is understood the whole creation to be made by God, not begotten of God, so as to be that which God is. Accordingly, now perhaps you will choose what to hold and what to reject. Choose what is better. Since we see many mutable things, and yet these good although mutable, many mortal things, and yet these good although mortal, but the unchangeable good is altogether God Himself — choose which it is better for you to hold: that God is mutable, or that what God made is mutable; for it is necessary that you say one of the two. If you will not admit that what God made is mutable, it remains that you say that God Himself is mutable.
But that you may purge yourself of this sacrilege and of this blasphemy, lest you say that the substance of God is mutable, why do you not grant that God, who truly is and is unchangeable — since He Himself also said, 'I am who I am' — made all things good, but not equal to Himself? Accordingly, since He Himself is unchangeable, it is no wonder if what He made, because it is not equal to Him, is not unchangeable, but mutable. Therefore also through free will it could sin and be defiled, and through His mercy be freed. FELIX said: You said that a man makes a son for himself; there is no difference between father and son. Since, therefore, your Holiness has put this forward, I too answer, that God and the things He makes are equal to Him. AUGUSTINE said:
What you were unwilling to understand — that a man, when he makes a son, is not properly said to make, but properly said to generate — so also God begot the only Son; I told you, He did not make him. But He made that which is not equal to Him; whereas what He begot is equal to Him. Therefore choose for yourself which you would rather say: that the creature of God is mutable, or that the nature of God is mutable. FELIX said: As God is immutable, likewise He whom He begot is immutable; and what He made, if it is of His own nature, is not changed. AUGUSTINE said: But it has already been told you that what He made is not of His own nature, but He made it out of nothing, because He is omnipotent. It was not, and He made it — not of Himself, not of any thing which He Himself had not made, but out of nothing. FELIX said:
I did not say this, but I said: since God is immutable, both that which He begot is immutable, and that which He made is immutable. I did not say out of what He made it; I did not ask this, out of what He may have made it. AUGUSTINE said: But you heard from me what you did not ask, so that you might now cease to speak foolishly. The omnipotent God was able both to generate of Himself, and to make out of nothing, and to form something out of that which He had already made: of Himself a Son equal to Himself; out of nothing the world and the whole creation; out of something, man from earth, because He is omnipotent. That, therefore, which is of Himself can never be defiled, just as He Himself;
But that which was made by him, and not out of him, can both be defiled through free will and be cleansed through his mercy—by condemning that which has sinned and acknowledging him who created it. You, however, who said a little earlier that whoever calls a part of God corruptible and defilable must be anathematized, cannot deny that Mani said that a part of God was seized and defiled among the race of darkness; and it is plain that by these words he blasphemed—so gravely, indeed, that he could perhaps not have blasphemed worse. Either anathematize him for saying such things, or you must be anathematized and cast out together with him. FELIX said: Mani says that a part of God has been defiled; and Christ says that the soul has been defiled, and that he came to set it free from defilement.
AUGUSTINE said: But the soul is not a part of God. For you have now already confessed that Mani said a part of God was defiled; we, however, say that the soul is defiled by the will to sin, and that the soul is not a part of God, not begotten of God, but made by God. Thus, then, the soul is said to be 'from God' in the way that some work of a craftsman is said to be from his skill, or made by him, yet not begotten out of him, as is his son. Since therefore you have already confessed that Mani said a part of God is defiled, and you said long ago that whoever calls God, or his nature, corruptible or defilable must be anathematized, you have already pronounced the anathema that you are unwilling to admit. For this, which you said—
quiapolluituretquiamundatur, hocipso, quoddicis "mundatur," expressisti, quiapolluitur, etnonhabes, undeeuadas. etManichaeusettudixisti. quiapolluiturparsdei. anathemaergoManichaeumautanathemandusescumManichaeo. FEL. dixit: EgononaManichaeodidici, quiapollutaestparsdei, sedaChristodidici. quiapropteranimamuenit, quaepollutaerat.. AUG. dixit: AChristonondidicisti, quiaanimaparsdeiest. FEL. dixit: AChristodidici, quiaanimaexdeoest. AUG. dixit: Etnosdidicimus, quiaanimaexdeoest, sednon" estparsdei." sicestenimanimaexdeo, quomodofacturaexartifice, nondedeo, sicutfiliusdepatre. FEL. dixit: Depollutioneagimus .
—namely that it is defiled and that it is cleansed—by this very saying, 'it is cleansed,' you have expressed that it is defiled, and you have no way of escape. Both Mani and you have said that a part of God is defiled. Anathematize Mani, then, or you must be anathematized along with Mani. FELIX said: I did not learn from Mani that a part of God is defiled, but I learned from Christ that he came on account of the soul, which had been defiled. AUGUSTINE said: You did not learn from Christ that the soul is a part of God. FELIX said: I learned from Christ that the soul is from God. AUGUSTINE said: We too have learned that the soul is from God, but that it is not 'a part of God.' For the soul is from God in the way that a thing made is from its maker, not out of God as the Son is out of the Father. FELIX said: We are dealing with defilement.
If the soul, which is from God, has been defiled, and can be purified by Christ, who came for its sake, then that part of God too, of which Mani speaks, can be defiled and cleansed through the command of God himself. AUGUSTINE said: See, again you say that a defiled part of God is purified, and a little before you had said that whoever calls it corruptible must be anathematized; now you say that it could be defiled, and you say that it can be cleansed—so as to confirm that it could be defiled. This we do not say of a part of God, but we say it of the soul, which is from him as his work, not as offspring out of him. Go back, then, to what you say, and distinguish what we say: the soul is neither God nor a part of God.
tuautemManichaeumdicisdixissepolluipartemdei, quamdicitpurgari, utconfirmet, quiapolluitur. restatergo, uteumanathemesautistasentiensanathemeris. PEL. dixit: Pertinetaddeumanima, quaeperpeccatumcoinquinataest, annon ? AUG. dixit: Pertinet, sednonestparseius. FEL. dixit: Nonhocinterrogaui. AUG. dixit: Etquidinterrogasti ? FEL. dixit: Pertinetaddeum, annonpertinet? AUG. dixit: Iamdixi, etquiapertinetetquomodopertineat. FEL. dixit: Egoquaero, utrumestexdeo. AUG. dixit: Exdeo, nondedeo. FEL. dixit:
But you say that Mani said a part of God is defiled, which he says is purified, so as to confirm that it is defiled. It remains, therefore, that you either anathematize him, or be anathematized yourself for holding these things. FELIX said: Does the soul, which has been polluted through sin, belong to God, or not? AUGUSTINE said: It belongs to him, but it is not a part of him. FELIX said: That is not what I asked. AUGUSTINE said: And what did you ask? FELIX said: Does it belong to God, or does it not belong? AUGUSTINE said: I have already said both that it belongs and in what manner it belongs. FELIX said: I ask whether it is from God. AUGUSTINE said: From God, but not out of God. FELIX said:
If it is no sin, since the soul is from God and has been defiled, and Christ came to free it and did free it from sin, why do we blame Mani, who says that a part of God has been defiled and is cleansed again? AUGUSTINE said: Because you have now confessed that Mani said a part of God is defiled, and you say it is no sin to pour out such blasphemy against God. We, however, do indeed say that the soul sinned through free will and is purified by repentance through the mercy of its Creator, since it is not from God as a part of him or as his offspring, but was made from God, or by God, as his work. What difference there is between our faith and your faithlessness is manifest to all.
itaquesecundumuerbatuasuperiora, quiaconcessistianathemandumeum, quidicitcorruptibilemdeinaturam — quodetManichaeumettediceremanifestumest — quianoluisti. utessetateanathematus, eriscumilloanathematus. Posthaeccummultisuerbisinterseagerent, FEL. dixit: Diciam, quiduisfaciam ? + AUG. dixit: (UtanathemesManichaeum, cuiussunttantaeistaeblasphemiae; sedsiexanimofacis, tuncfac . nemoenimtecogitinuitum. FEL. dixit: Deusuidet, siexanimofacio; nonenimhomopotestuidere . sedhocpeto, utconfirmesme. AUG. dixit: Inquouisutconfirmemte? FEL. dixit: Priortuanathema, utetegoposteaanathemem. AUG. dixit: Eccemanumeaetiamscribo;
And so, according to your own earlier words—since you granted that whoever calls the nature of God corruptible must be anathematized (which it is plain that both Mani and you say)—because you were unwilling to be the one to anathematize him, you will be anathematized together with him. After this, when they had argued much between themselves, FELIX said: Tell me now, what do you want me to do? AUGUSTINE said: That you anathematize Mani, whose are these so great blasphemies; but if you do it from the heart, then do it, for no one compels you against your will. FELIX said: God sees whether I do it from the heart, for no man can see it. But this I ask, that you strengthen me. AUGUSTINE said: In what do you wish me to strengthen you? FELIX said: You anathematize first, so that I too may anathematize afterward. AUGUSTINE said: See, I even write it with my own hand;
for I want you also to write with your own hand. FELIX said: But anathematize in such a way as also to anathematize that very spirit which was in Mani and spoke these things through him. Augustine, taking a sheet, wrote these words: I, Augustine, bishop of the Catholic Church, have already anathematized Mani and his doctrine and the spirit which through him spoke such execrable blasphemies, because it was a spirit that seduces—not the spirit of truth, but of impious error; and now I anathematize the aforesaid Mani and the spirit of his error. And when he had given the same sheet to Felix, he too wrote these words with his own hand:
I, Felix, who had believed in Mani, now anathematize him and his doctrine and the seducing spirit that was in him—who said that God mingled a part of himself with the race of darkness and freed it in so shameful a manner, transforming his own powers (virtutes) into females against the male demons, and these again into males against the female demons, in such a way that afterward he fastens forever in the globe of darkness the remnants of that same part of his. All these and the other blasphemies of Mani I anathematize. I, bishop Augustine, have subscribed to these proceedings enacted in the church before the people. I, Felix, have subscribed to these proceedings.