📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 書信與論戰集(CSEL)

希波的奧古斯丁

書信與論戰集(CSEL) 第 22 章

拉丁文原文.135 節.部分字詞可點開查義

← 第 21 章第 23 章 →
22:1
Honorio Augusto sexies consule septimo idus Decembris AUGUSTINUS episcopus ecclesiae catholicae Hipponeregiensium regionum dixit: Hesterno die scis te dixisse, quod possis defendere scripturas Manichaei et adserere, quod ueritatem habeant: si hoc tibi placet et hodie facere aut praesumis te posse, dic. FELIX Manichaeus dixit: Ego non nego me dixisse defendere legem meam, si proferantur auctores legis meae in medio. Et cum Augustinus episcopus epistulam Manichaei, quam Fundamenti appellant, protulisset, dixit: Si legero ex hoc codice, quem me uides fen-e, epistulam Manichaei quam Fundamenti appellatis, potes agnoscere, an ipsa sit? FEL. dixit: Agnosco. AUG. dixit: Accipe tu ipse et lege.
在何諾流‧奧古斯都第六次任執政官之年、十二月望前第七日,希波‧雷吉烏斯各區大公教會的主教奧古斯丁說:你知道你昨天說過,你能為摩尼的著作辯護,並且斷言它們含有真理。若這使你滿意,而你今天也承擔或自認能做到,就請說吧。摩尼教徒斐理斯說:我不否認我曾說要為我的教法辯護,只要我教法的作者被公開拿到眾人面前來。當奧古斯丁主教把摩尼那封他們稱為《基礎書》的信拿出來時,他說:我若從你看見我所拿的這本冊子中,讀出摩尼那封你們稱為《基礎書》的信,你能認出它是否就是那一封嗎?斐理斯說:我認得。奧古斯丁說:你自己拿去讀吧。
In the sixth consulship of Honorius Augustus, on the seventh day before the Ides of December, Augustine, bishop of the Catholic Church of the districts of Hippo Regius, said: You know that yesterday you said that you could defend the writings of Manichaeus and assert that they possess the truth. If this pleases you, and today you also either undertake or presume that you can do it, say so. Felix the Manichaean said: I do not deny that I said I would defend my law, if the authors of my law are brought forward into the open. And when Bishop Augustine had brought forth the letter of Manichaeus which they call «the Foundation,» he said: If I read from this codex, which you see me carrying, the letter of Manichaeus which you call «the Foundation,» can you recognize whether it is the same one? Felix said: I recognize it. Augustine said: Take it yourself and read.
22:2
Et cum accepisset codicem Felix, legit: Manichaeus apostolus Iesu Christi prouidentia dei patris. haec sunt salubria uerba ex perenni ac uiuo fonte: quae qui audierit et iisdem primum crediderit, deinde quae insinuata sunt custodierit, numquam erit morti obnoxius, uerum aeterna et gloriosa uita fruetur. nam profecto beatus est iudicandus, qui hac diuina instructus cognitione fuerit, per quam liberatus in sempiterna uita permanebit. AUG. episcopus dixit: Agnouisti certe epistulam Manichaei uestri ?., FEL. dixit: Agnoui. , AUG. dixit: Proba nobis ergo, quomodo Manichaeus iste sit apostolus Iesu Christi.
斐理斯接過冊子後,便讀道:「摩尼,藉父上帝的眷佑作耶穌基督的使徒。這些是出於永存活泉的有益之言:凡聽了這些話、並且先信了它們、然後持守那所啟示之事的人,永不至於死亡,反要享受永恆榮耀的生命。因為凡受了這神聖知識教導的人,必當被判為有福,藉此知識他既得釋放,便要存留在永生之中。」奧古斯丁主教說:你確實認得你們摩尼的這封信嗎?斐理斯說:我認得。奧古斯丁說:那麼請你向我們證明,這摩尼怎麼會是耶穌基督的使徒。
And when Felix had received the codex, he read: «Manichaeus, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the providence of God the Father. These are the wholesome words from the perennial and living fountain: which whoever shall have heard, and first believed them, then kept what has been intimated, shall never be subject to death, but shall enjoy eternal and glorious life. For assuredly he is to be judged blessed who shall have been instructed by this divine knowledge, by which, set free, he shall remain in everlasting life.» Bishop Augustine said: You have certainly recognized the letter of your Manichaeus? Felix said: I have recognized it. Augustine said: Prove to us, then, in what way this Manichaeus is an apostle of Jesus Christ.
22:3
non enim eum in euangelio inter apostolos aliquando legimus et quis fuerit ordinatus in locum Iudae traditoris, nouimus, id est sanctus Matthias; et quis postea domini uoce de caelo uocatus sit, hoc est Paulus apostolus, omnes recognoscunt. istum ergo Manichaeum proba nobis apostolum esse Christi, quod in capite epistulae suae ausus est ponere. FEL. dixit: Et sanctitas tua mihi probet, quod in euangelio scriptum est Christo dicente: uado ad patrem; et mitto uobis spiritum sanctum paracletum, qui uos inducat in omnem ueritatem. hoc tu mihi extra scripturam istam proba esse scripturam spiritus sancti, quod Christus promisit, ubi omnis ueritas inueniatur;
因為我們在福音書中從未讀到他列在使徒之中;而那位被立來接替賣主的猶大之位的人是誰,我們是知道的,就是聖馬提亞;那位後來蒙主從天上發聲呼召的人是誰,就是使徒保羅,眾人都認得。那麼請你向我們證明,這摩尼就是基督的使徒,這正是他膽敢寫在信首的。斐理斯說:也請閣下的聖德向我證明,福音書中所記、基督所說的:「我往父那裡去;我要差保惠師聖靈給你們,祂要引導你們進入一切真理。」請你在這卷經文之外,向我證明那基督所應許、可尋見一切真理之聖靈的經文是什麼;
For we nowhere read of him in the Gospel among the apostles; and we know who was ordained in the place of Judas the betrayer — namely, holy Matthias; and who afterward was called by the voice of the Lord from heaven — that is, the Apostle Paul — all men recognize. Prove to us, then, that this Manichaeus is an apostle of Christ, as he has dared to set down at the head of his letter. Felix said: Let your holiness also prove to me what is written in the Gospel, Christ saying: «I go to the Father; and I send to you the Holy Spirit the Paraclete, who will lead you into all truth.» Prove to me, apart from this Scripture, that this is the Scripture of the Holy Spirit which Christ promised, where all truth is to be found;
22:4
et si inuenero ueritatem in aliis codicibus, qui ad Manichaeum non pertinent, et Christus illos tradiditsic enim dictum est a Christo, quia spiritus sanctus paracletus ipse in omnem ueritatem inducetsecundum Christi sermonem ego scripturam Manichaei recuso. AUG. dixit:
倘若我在別的、不屬於摩尼的冊子中找到那真理,而那些是基督所交付的——因為基督確實這樣說過,就是保惠師聖靈自己要引導人進入一切真理——那麼,照基督的話,我便棄絕摩尼的經書。奧古斯丁說:
and if I find the truth in other codices that do not pertain to Manichaeus, and Christ delivered those — for it was so said by Christ, that the Holy Spirit the Paraclete Himself will lead into all truth — then, according to the word of Christ, I reject the Scripture of Manichaeus. Augustine said:
22:5
Quoniam ergo tu probare non potuisti, quomodo sit Manichaeus apostolus Christi, et exigis, ut ego probem, quomodo miserit spiritum sanctum paracletum, quem promisit, ut tunc respuas scripturas Manichaei, si inueneris inpletam promissionem Christi praeter scripturas Manichaei, quamuis prior ad interrogata mea respondere debueris, tamen ecce ego prior respondeo et ostendo tibi, quando missus sit spiritus sanctus, quem Christus promisit. et accedit ad euangelium et actus apostolorum. Et cum accepisset codicem euangelii, recitauit: dum autem haec loquuntur, stetit Iesus in medio eorum et dixit eia: pax uobis; ego sum, nolite timere. et cum legeret, dixit: hoc post resurrectionem.
既然如此,你既不能證明摩尼怎樣是基督的使徒,卻要求我證明祂怎樣差遣了祂所應許的保惠師聖靈——好讓你在摩尼的著作之外若找到基督應許的成就,便可棄絕摩尼的著作——雖然你本該先回答我的問題,然而,看哪,我先來回答,並向你顯明那基督所應許的聖靈是何時被差來的。於是他取來福音書與使徒行傳。當他接過福音書的冊子後,便誦讀道:「他們正說這話的時候,耶穌站在他們中間,對他們說:願你們平安;是我,不要怕。」他讀著讀著,就說:這是在復活之後。
Since, then, you have not been able to prove in what way Manichaeus is an apostle of Christ, and you demand that I prove in what way He sent the Holy Spirit the Paraclete whom He promised — so that you may then reject the writings of Manichaeus, if you find the promise of Christ fulfilled apart from the writings of Manichaeus — although you ought first to have answered my questions, nevertheless, behold, I answer first and show you when the Holy Spirit was sent whom Christ promised. And he goes to the Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles. And when he had received the codex of the Gospel, he recited: «But while they were speaking these things, Jesus stood in the midst of them and said to them: Peace be to you; it is I, do not fear.» And as he was reading, he said: This is after the resurrection.
22:6
et cum dixisset, legit: conturbati uero et conterriti aestimabant se spiritum uidere. et dixit eis: quid turbati estis et cogitationes ascendunt in corda uestra? uidete manus meas et pedes, quia ego ipse sum; palpate et uidete, quia spiritus carnem et ossa non habet, sicut me uidetis habere. et cum hoc dixisset, ostendit eis manus et pedes. adhuc autem illis non credentibus et mirantibus prae gaudio dixit: habetis hic aliquid, quod manducetur? at illi obtulerunt ei partem piscis assi et fauum mellis. et cum manducasset coram eis, sumens reliquias dedit eis et dixit ad eos:
他說了這話,就讀道:「他們卻驚慌害怕,以為所看見的是鬼魂。祂對他們說:你們為什麼愁煩?為什麼心裡起疑念呢?你們看我的手、我的腳,就知道是我自己;摸我看看,鬼魂沒有肉和骨,你們看我是有的。祂說了這話,就把手和腳給他們看。他們正因喜樂還不敢信、並且希奇的時候,祂說:你們這裡有什麼吃的沒有?他們便遞給祂一片燒魚和一塊蜂房。祂在他們面前吃了,就把剩下的拿起來遞給他們,對他們說:」
And when he had said this, he read: «But they, troubled and terrified, supposed that they saw a spirit. And He said to them: Why are you troubled, and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? See my hands and feet, that it is I myself; handle me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones, as you see me to have. And when He had said this, He showed them His hands and feet. And while they still did not believe, and marvelled for joy, He said: Have you anything here to eat? And they offered Him a piece of broiled fish and a honeycomb. And when He had eaten before them, taking the remains He gave them to them and said to them:»
22:7
haec sunt uerba, quae locutus sum ad uos, cum adhuc essem uobiscum, quoniam necesse est inpleri omnia, quae scripta sunt in lege Moysi et prophetis et psalmis de me. tunc aperuit illis sensum, ut intellegerent scripturas, et dixit eis: quoniam sic scriptum est et sic oportebat Christum pati et resurgere a mortuis die tertio et praedicari in nomine eius paenitentiam et remissionem peccatorum in omnes gentes, incipientibus ab Hierusalem. uos autem estis testes horum. et ego mittam promissum patris mei in uos; uos autem sedete in ciuitate, quoadusque induamini uirtutem ex alto. et cum reddidisset codicem euangelii, accepit actus apostolorum et dixit:
「這些話是我還與你們同在時對你們所說的,因為摩西的律法、先知書和詩篇上所記關於我的一切話都必須應驗。」於是他開啟他們的心竅,使他們能明白聖經,並對他們說:「照經上所寫的,基督必須這樣受害,第三天從死裡復活,並且人要奉他的名傳悔改與赦罪之道,從耶路撒冷起直傳到萬邦。你們就是這些事的見證。我要將我父所應許的降在你們身上;你們要留在城裡,直到你們領受從上頭來的能力。」他把福音書交還之後,就拿起使徒行傳說:
These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, for it is necessary that all things be fulfilled which are written concerning me in the law of Moses and in the prophets and in the psalms. Then he opened their understanding, that they might comprehend the Scriptures, and he said to them: Thus it is written, and thus it behooved the Christ to suffer and to rise again from the dead on the third day, and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And you are witnesses of these things. And I will send the promise of my Father upon you; but stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high. And when he had handed back the book of the Gospel, he took up the Acts of the Apostles and said:
22:8
Audiuimus in euangelio commemorasse euangelistam sanctum promissionem Christi, quae est in euangelio secundum Iohannem, quem praesens Felix commemorauit. ubi enim dixit dominus: mitto uobis spiritum sanctum paracletum, Iohannes euangelista scripsit. hoc autem, quod modo legi, Lucas euangelista adtestatus est et consonuit ueritati apostoli Iohannis. uideamus etiam quomodo perfectum est, quod promisit dominus et quomodo inpletum, ut cum fuerit ex canonicis libris sanctae ecclesiae expressa inpletio promissionis domini, paracletum spiritum sanctum alterum non quaeramus, ne in seductorum laqueos incurramus. Et recitauit ex actibus apostolorum:
我們在福音書中聽見那聖的福音作者記述了基督的應許,就是約翰福音中所載、在場的斐利克斯所提及的那應許。因為主說「我要差聖靈保惠師到你們這裡來」的話,是福音作者約翰所寫下的。而我方才所讀的這段,則是福音作者路加所見證的,與使徒約翰所說的真理相符。我們也來看主所應許的是如何成就、如何應驗的,好使當我們從聖教會的正典書卷中看見主的應許得了應驗,就不再另尋別的保惠師聖靈,免得落入迷惑者的網羅。於是他從使徒行傳讀道:
We have heard in the Gospel that the holy Evangelist recalled the promise of Christ, which is in the Gospel according to John, which Felix here present has recalled. For where the Lord said, 'I send to you the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete,' John the Evangelist wrote it. But this which I have just read, Luke the Evangelist has attested, and it agrees with the truth of the apostle John. Let us see also how what the Lord promised was accomplished, and how it was fulfilled, so that when the fulfillment of the Lord's promise has been set forth from the canonical books of the holy Church, we may not seek another Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, lest we fall into the snares of seducers. And he read from the Acts of the Apostles:
22:9
primum quidem sermonem feci de omnibus, o Theophile, quae coepit Iesus facere et docere in die, quo apostolos elegit per spiritum sanctum et praecepit praedicare euangelium: quibus praebuit se uiuum post passionem in multis argumentis dierum uisus eis dies quadraginta . et docens de regno dei et quomodo conuersatus est cum illis. et praecepit eis, ne discederent ab Hierosolymis, sed sustinerent pollicitationem patris, quam audistis, inquit, ex ore meo, quoniam Iohannes quidem baptizauit aqua, uos autem spiritu sancto incipietis baptizari, quem et accepturi estis non post multos istos dies usque ad pentecosten. illi ergo conuenientes interrogabant eum dicentes: domine.
提阿非羅啊,我已作了第一篇記述,論到耶穌所開始行、所開始教訓的一切事,就是在他藉聖靈揀選使徒、吩咐他們傳福音的那日;他受害以後,也用許多憑據將自己活活地顯給他們看,四十天之久被他們看見,並講說神國的事,以及他如何與他們相處。他吩咐他們不要離開耶路撒冷,卻要等候父的應許,說:「這應許是你們從我口中聽見的;約翰是用水施洗,但你們要開始受聖靈的洗,這聖靈你們也要領受,不多幾日,直到五旬節。」於是他們聚集起來問他說:「主啊。」
Theophilus, I made my first discourse concerning all the things that Jesus began to do and to teach, on the day when he chose the apostles through the Holy Spirit and commanded them to preach the Gospel; to whom also he showed himself alive after his passion by many proofs, being seen by them over forty days and speaking of the kingdom of God and how he conversed with them. And he commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to await the promise of the Father, 'which,' he said, 'you have heard from my mouth; for John indeed baptized with water, but you shall begin to be baptized with the Holy Spirit, whom you shall also receive not many days hence, up until Pentecost.' They therefore, coming together, questioned him, saying, 'Lord.'
22:10
si in hoc tempore praesentabis regnum Israhel? ille autem dixit: nemo potest cognoscere tempus, quod pater posuit in sua potestate; sed accipietis uirtutem spiritus sancti superuenientem in uos et eritis mihi testes apud Hierosolymam et in tota Iudaea et Samaria et usque in totam terram. cum haec diceret, nubes suscepit eum et sublatus est ab eis. et quomodo contemplantes erant, cum iret in caelum, ecce, duo uiri astabant illis in ueste alba, qui dixerunt ad eos: uiri Galilaei, quid statis respicientes in caelum? iste Iesus, qui adsumptus est in caelum a uobis, sic ueniet, quemadmodam uidistis eum euntem in caelum.
「你是否要在這時候復興以色列國呢?」他卻說:「父憑著自己的權柄所定的時候,是無人能知道的;但聖靈降臨在你們身上,你們就必得著能力,並要在耶路撒冷、猶太全地、撒瑪利亞,直到地極,作我的見證。」他說了這話,就有一朵雲彩把他接去,他便從他們眼前被提上升。當他往天上去、他們定睛觀看的時候,忽有兩個人身穿白衣,站在他們旁邊,對他們說:「加利利人哪,你們為什麼站著望天呢?這位離開你們被接升天的耶穌,你們見他怎樣往天上去,他還要怎樣來。」
If at this time you will restore the kingdom to Israel? But he said: No one can know the time which the Father has placed in his own power; but you shall receive the power of the Holy Spirit coming upon you, and you shall be witnesses to me at Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the whole earth. When he had said these things, a cloud received him and he was taken up from them. And as they were gazing while he went into heaven, behold, two men stood by them in white raiment, who said to them: Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, shall so come as you have seen him going into heaven.
22:11
tunc reuersi sunt Hierosolymam a monte, qui uocatur Elaeon, qui est iuxta Hierosolymam sabbati habens iter. et cum introissent, ascenderunt in superiora, ubi habitabant Petrus et Iohannes, Iacobus et Andreas, Philippus et Thomas, Bartholomaeus et Matthaeus, Iacobus Alphaei et Simon Zelotes et Iudas Iacobi. et erant perseuerantes omnes unanimes in orationibus cum mulieribus et Maria, quae fuerat mater Iesu, et fratribus eius.
於是他們從那名叫橄欖山的山上回到耶路撒冷;這山靠近耶路撒冷,相隔有一個安息日可走的路程。他們進了城,就上了樓房,那裡有彼得、約翰、雅各、安得烈、腓力、多馬、巴多羅買、馬太、亞勒腓的兒子雅各、奮銳黨的西門、雅各的兄弟猶大居住。這些人都同心合意地恆切禱告,還有幾個婦人和那曾為耶穌母親的馬利亞,並耶穌的弟兄一同禱告。
Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a sabbath day's journey away. And when they had entered, they went up into the upper room, where dwelt Peter and John, James and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus and Simon Zelotes and Jude the brother of James. And they all were persevering with one accord in prayer, together with the women and Mary, who had been the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren.
22:12
et in diebus illis exurrexit Petrus in medio audientium et dixitfuit autem turba in uno hominum quasi centum uiginti uirifratres, oportet adinpleri scripturam istam, quam praedixit spiritus sanctus ore sancti Dauid de Iuda, qui fuit deductor illorum, qui comprehenderunt Iesum, quoniam adnumeratus erat inter nos, qui babuit sortem huius ministerii. hic igitur possedit agrum de mercede iniustitiae suae et collum sibi alligauit et deiectus in faciem diruptus est medius et effusa sunt omnia uiscera eius. quod et cognitum factum est omnibus, qui inhabitabant Hierosolymam, ita ut uocaretur ager ille ipsorum lingua Acheldemach, id est ager sanguinis. scriptum est enim in libro psalmorum:
當那些日子,彼得在聽眾中間站起來說——那時聚在一處的人約有一百二十名——「弟兄們,聖靈藉聖大衛的口所預言關於猶大的這段經文,必須應驗;猶大就是那領人捉拿耶穌之人的嚮導,因他本列在我們數中,並在這職事上分得了一分。這人用他不義的工價買了一塊田,又把繩子套在自己頸上,身子仆倒,從中間裂開,腸子都流出來了。這事凡住在耶路撒冷的人都知道了,所以那塊田按他們本地的話稱為亞革大馬,就是血田的意思。因為詩篇上寫著說:
And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the hearers and said—now there was a crowd gathered in one place of about a hundred and twenty men—'Brethren, this Scripture must be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit foretold by the mouth of the holy David concerning Judas, who was the guide to those who seized Jesus, for he was numbered among us and had obtained a share of this ministry. This man, therefore, acquired a field from the reward of his iniquity, and bound his neck for himself and fell headlong, and was burst asunder in the middle, and all his bowels gushed out. And this became known to all who dwelt in Jerusalem, so that that field was called in their own tongue Akeldama, that is, the field of blood. For it is written in the book of Psalms:'
22:13
fiat uilla eius deserta et non sit, qui inhabitet in ea, et episcopatum eius accipiat alter. oportet itaque ex his uiris, qui conuenerunt nobiscum in omni tempore, quo introiuit super nos et excessit dominus Iesus Christus incipiens a baptismo Iohannis usque in illum diem, quo adsumptus est a nobis, testem resurrectionis eius nobiscum esse. et statuit duos, Ioseph, qui uocabatur Barsabas, qui et Iustus, et Matthiam. et precatus dixit: tu, domine. cordis omnium intellector, ostende ex his duobus, quem elegisti ad suscipiendum locum huius ministerii et adnuntiationis, a qua excessit ludas ambulare in locum suum.
『願他的住處變為荒場,無人在其中居住』,又說『願別人得他的職分。』所以,在主耶穌基督在我們中間出入的全部時間裡——從約翰施洗起,直到他從我們中間被接上升的那日——那些常與我們作伴的人中,必須有一人同我們作他復活的見證。於是他們立了兩個人:一個是稱為巴撒巴、又稱猶士都的約瑟,另一個是馬提亞。他們禱告說:「主啊,你知道萬人的心,求你從這兩個人中,指明你所揀選的是誰,好叫他得這職事使徒的位分,這位分是猶大離棄、往自己地方去所丟下的。」
'Let his dwelling be desolate, and let there be no one to dwell in it,' and 'Let another take his office.' It is fitting, therefore, that of these men who accompanied us during all the time in which the Lord Jesus Christ went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism of John until that day on which he was taken up from us, one should be with us a witness of his resurrection. And they set forth two, Joseph, who was called Barsabbas, who was also called Justus, and Matthias. And praying, he said: 'You, Lord, who know the hearts of all, show which of these two you have chosen to take up the place of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas fell away to go to his own place.'
22:14
et dederunt sortes suas et cecidit sors super Matthiam et simul deputatus est cum undecim apostolis duodecimus. et cum legisset, dixit: Audiuimus, quis ordinatus est in locum Iudae traditoris, quod paulo ante commemoraui, ne quisquam per fraudem inrepat in apostolorum numerum et nomine apostolatus fallat ignaros. Nunc uideamus, quod promisimus, quomodo inpleta sit Christi promissio de spiritu sancto. et cum dixisset legit in loco: tempore, quo subpletus est dies pentecostes, fuerunt omnes simul in uno. et factus est subito de caelo sonus, quasi ferretur flatus uehemens, et inpleuit totam illam domum, in qua erant sedentes.
他們就為這兩個人搖籤,籤落在馬提亞身上,他便同十一位使徒一齊被列為第十二位。他讀完這段以後說:我們已聽見在賣主的猶大位分上所立的是誰,這就是我方才所提及的,免得有人藉詭詐混進使徒的數目,冒使徒的名欺哄無知的人。如今我們照所應許的,來看基督關於聖靈的應許是如何應驗的。他說了這話,就讀那段經文:五旬節到了的時候,門徒都聚集在一處。忽然從天上有響聲下來,好像一陣猛烈的風吹過,充滿了他們所坐的整座屋子。
And they gave forth their lots, and the lot fell upon Matthias, and he was at once numbered as the twelfth with the eleven apostles. And when he had read this, he said: We have heard who was ordained in the place of Judas the traitor, which I mentioned a little before, lest anyone should creep in by fraud into the number of the apostles and by the name of apostleship deceive the ignorant. Now let us see, as we promised, how the promise of Christ concerning the Holy Spirit was fulfilled. And when he had said this, he read in the passage: In the time when the day of Pentecost was completed, they were all together in one place. And suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a violent gust rushing, and it filled the whole house in which they were sitting.
22:15
et uisae sunt illis linguae diuisae quasi ignis, qui et insedit super unumquemque eorum. et inpleti sunt omnes spiritu sancto et coeperunt loqui uariis linguis quomodo spiritus dabat eis pronuntiare. Hierosolymis autem fuerunt habitatores Iudaei, homines ex omni natione, quae est sub caelo. et cum facta esset uox, collecta est turba et confusa, quoniam audiebat unusquisque suo sermone et suis linguis loquentes eos. stupebant autem et admirabantur ad inuicem dicentes: nonne omnes, qui loquuntur, natione sunt Galilaei? et quomodo agnoscimus in illis sermonem; in quo nati sumus?
又有舌頭如火焰顯現,分開落在他們各人身上。他們就都被聖靈充滿,照著聖靈所賜的口才,開始說起別種的方言來。那時,有虔誠的猶太人從天下各國來,住在耶路撒冷。這聲音一響,眾人都聚集起來,各人聽見他們用自己的鄉談和自己的方言說話,就甚納悶。眾人驚訝希奇,彼此說:「看哪,這說話的不都是加利利人麼?我們怎麼各人聽見他們說我們生來所用的鄉談呢?」
And there appeared to them tongues divided as of fire, which also settled upon each one of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with various tongues, according as the Spirit gave them to utter. Now there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, men from every nation that is under heaven. And when this sound was made, the crowd came together and was confounded, because each one heard them speaking in his own speech and in his own tongue. And they were astonished and marveled, saying to one another: Are not all these who speak Galileans by nation? And how do we recognize among them the speech in which we were born?
22:16
Parthi, Medi et Elamitae, et qui inhabitant Mesopotamiam, Iudaeam et Cappadociam, Pontum, Asiam, Phrygiam et Pamphyliam, Aegyptum et partes Libyae, quae est ad Cyrenem, et qui aderant Romani ludaeique et proselyti, Cretenses et Arabes audiebant loquentes illos suis linguis magnalia dei. et cum recitaret, dixit: Audisti nunc iam spiritum sanctum et quomodo sit missus? quod de me exegisti probaui; superest, ut et tu facias, quod promisisti. quoniam inuenimus, quando miserit spiritum sanctum, quem promisit, respuas illam scripturam, quae sub nomine spiritus sancti fraudare uoluit uel lectorem uel auditorem. FEL. dixit:
就是帕提亞人、瑪代人、以攔人,和住在美索不達米亞、猶太、加帕多家、本都、亞細亞、弗呂家、旁非利亞、埃及,以及靠近古利奈之利比亞一帶地方的人,並來寄居的羅馬人——無論是猶太人或進猶太教的人——革哩底人和亞拉伯人,都聽見他們用自己的方言講說神的大作為。他讀完這段就說:你如今已聽見了聖靈以及他是如何被差遣的。你向我所要求的,我已證明了;如今剩下的,就是你也當履行你所應許的。既然我們已尋見主何時差來他所應許的聖靈,你就當棄絕那託聖靈之名、企圖欺哄讀者或聽者的著作。斐利克斯說:
Parthians, Medes, and Elamites, and those who dwell in Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus, Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and the Romans who were present, both Jews and proselytes, Cretans and Arabs, heard them speaking in their own tongues the mighty works of God. And when he had read this, he said: You have now heard of the Holy Spirit and how he was sent. What you required of me I have proved; it remains that you also do what you promised. Since we have found when he sent the Holy Spirit whom he promised, reject that writing which under the name of the Holy Spirit sought to defraud either the reader or the hearer. Felix said:
22:17
Ego non nego id quod dixi, quia cum probatum mihi fuerit, quod spiritus sanctus docuerit ueritatem, quam quaero. illam respuo. hoc enim sanctitas tua mihi legit, ubi spiritum sanctum apostoli acceperunt. et in ipsis apostolis unum quaero, qui me doceat de initio, de medio, de fine. AUG. dixit: Si legeris hoc dixisse dominum: mitto uobis spiritum sanctum, qui uos doceat initium, medium, finem, bene me astringis, ut ostendam, quos docuerit spiritus sanctus. FEL. dixit: Quia sanctitas tua hoc dicit, quod apostoli ipsi acceperunt spiritum sanctum paracletum, iterum dico:
我並不否認我所說的,因為當我得了證明,知道聖靈教導了我所尋求的真理,我便棄絕那另一部書。你的聖尊方才向我所讀的,正是使徒領受聖靈之處。而在使徒本身中,我尋求一位能教導我明白起初、中間、末後的。奧古斯丁說:你若讀到主曾說過這話——「我差聖靈給你們,他要教導你們起初、中間、末後」——你就有理由要我指出聖靈教導了什麼。斐利克斯說:既然你的聖尊這樣說,說使徒本身領受了聖靈保惠師,我便再說:
I do not deny what I said, for when it has been proved to me that the Holy Spirit has taught the truth which I seek, I reject that other writing. For this your Holiness has read to me, where the apostles received the Holy Spirit. And in the apostles themselves I seek one who may teach me concerning the beginning, the middle, and the end. Augustine said: If you read that the Lord said this—'I send you the Holy Spirit, who shall teach you the beginning, the middle, and the end'—you rightly bind me to show what the Holy Spirit taught. Felix said: Since your Holiness says this, that the apostles themselves received the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, I say again:
22:18
de apostolis ipsis quem uolueris, doceat me, quod me Manichaeus docuit, aut ipsius doctrinam euacuet, de duodecim quem uolueris. AUG. dixit: Absit longe a fide apostolorum, ut doctrinam doceant sacrilegi Manichaei. sed quoniam dicis unum ipsorum debere euacuare doctrinam Manichaei, modo autem sancti apostoli non sunt in corpore, ego minimus non solum omnium apostolorum, sed omnium episcoporum, — nam ad merita apostolorum quando aspiro? — quantum mihi dominus de ipso spiritu suo largiri dignatus est, euacuo doctrinam Manichaei, cum coeperint legi sequentia illius epistulae, quam tu ipse Manichaei esse non negas. FEL. dixit: Dixisti, quia apostoli de corpore recesserunt;
從使徒本身中,你要哪一位就哪一位,讓他教導我摩尼所教導我的,或使摩尼的教訓歸於無效——十二使徒中你要哪一位就哪一位。奧古斯丁說:使徒的信仰斷不會、也絕不容他們去教導那褻瀆的摩尼的教訓。但既然你說他們中應有一位使摩尼的教訓歸於無效,而聖使徒如今已不在肉身中,那麼我這在眾使徒中、甚至在眾主教中最微小的人——我幾時敢仰望使徒的功德呢?——就要照主所樂意賜給我他自己聖靈的分量,來使摩尼的教訓歸於無效;只等我們開始宣讀那封書信下文,那書信你自己也不否認是摩尼的。斐利克斯說:你說使徒已離了肉身;
Of the apostles themselves, whichever you wish, let him teach me what Mani taught me, or let him make void Mani's doctrine—of the twelve, whichever you wish. Augustine said: Far, far be it from the faith of the apostles that they should teach the doctrine of the sacrilegious Mani. But since you say that one of them ought to make void the doctrine of Mani, and yet the holy apostles are now not in the body, I, the least not only of all the apostles but of all bishops—for when could I aspire to the merits of the apostles?—as much as the Lord has deigned to bestow on me of his own Spirit, will make void the doctrine of Mani, when the following portions of that epistle begin to be read, which you yourself do not deny to be Mani's. Felix said: You said that the apostles have departed from the body;
22:19
scripturae eorum ualent usque nunc . et quia dixit sanctitas tua et quia dedisti potestatem dicendi, quae uoluerimus sine ulla formidine, dixisti euacuo legem Manichaei\', et ego dico: omnis homo mendax, solus deus uerax; scripturae dei loquuntur. AUG. dixit: Tu quidem et homo es et, sicut res ipsa modo indicatura est, mendax. et quoniam locutus es, quae uoluisti, non de scriptura dei, oportet et me loqui quod uolo. si enim ueritas est Manichaei tui, nec a me destrui poterit; si falsitas est. quid interest, a quo destruatur?
他們的著作至今仍然有效。既然你的聖尊這樣說,又既然你已允許我們可以毫無懼怕地說我們所願說的,你說:「我使摩尼的律法歸於無效」;我便說:人都是虛謊的,唯獨神是真實的;且讓神的聖經來說話。奧古斯丁說:你固然既是人,且如事情本身即將顯明的,是個說謊的人。既然你已隨你所願、卻非根據神的聖經說了話,那麼我也理當說我所願說的。因為若那是你摩尼的真理,即便我也不能將它毀滅;但若是虛謊,那麼由誰來毀滅它,又有什麼分別呢?
their writings avail even until now. And since your Holiness has said, and since you have given leave to say what we wish without any fear, you said, 'I make void the law of Mani'; and I say: every man is a liar, God alone is truthful; let the Scriptures of God speak. Augustine said: You indeed are both a man and, as the matter itself is about to show, a liar. And since you have spoken what you wished, not from the Scripture of God, it behooves me too to speak what I wish. For if it is the truth of your Mani, it will not be able to be destroyed even by me; but if it is falsehood, what does it matter by whom it is destroyed?
22:20
tamen quia de apostolorum scriptura dixisti, quod etsi illi non sunt in corpore, sunt hic scripturae eorumante adsumpti sunt apostoli, quam error Manichaei natus in mundo fueratpropterea non inueniuntur scripturae apostolorum euidenter contra Manichaeum disserentes. uerumtamen quod apostolus Paulus in spiritu isto sancto paracleto, quem acceperat, futurum praeuiderit de talibus, qualis Manichaeus fuit, quales estis et uos, recito, ut agnoscas. et accepta epistula apostoli Pauli ad Timotheum legit:
然而,既然你論到使徒的著作說,他們雖不在肉身中,他們的著作卻仍在這裡——使徒被接去,是在摩尼的謬誤生於世界之前——因此使徒的著作中找不到明明地與摩尼辯駁之處。但使徒保羅在他所領受的那同一位聖靈保惠師裡,所預見將要出現、關乎像摩尼那樣、也像你們這樣的人的話,我要讀出來,好叫你認得。他便拿起使徒保羅寫給提摩太的書信,讀道:
Nevertheless, since you have said concerning the writings of the apostles that although they are not in the body, yet their writings are here—the apostles were taken up before the error of Mani had been born in the world—for that reason the writings of the apostles are not found manifestly disputing against Mani. Yet what the apostle Paul, in that same Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, whom he had received, foresaw would come to pass concerning such men as Mani was, and such as you also are, I will read, that you may recognize it. And having taken the epistle of the apostle Paul to Timothy, he read:
22:21
spiritus autem manifeste dicit, quod in nouissimis temporibus recedent quidam & fide adtendentes spiritibus seductoribus, doctrinis daemoniorum in hypocrisi mendaciloquorum, cauteriatam habentes conscientiam suam, prohibentes nubere, abstinere a cibis, quos deus creauit ad percipiendum cum gratiarum actione fidelibus et his qui cognouerunt ueritatem, quia omnis creatura dei bona est et nihil abiciendum, quod cum gratiarum actione percipitur; sanctificatur enim per uerbum dei et orationem. haec praecipiens fratribus-bonus eris minister Iesu Christi. et cum legeret, dixit:
聖靈明說,在末後的時候,必有人離棄真道,聽從那引誘人的邪靈和鬼魔的道理;這是因為說謊之人的假冒,他們的良心如同被熱鐵烙慣了一般。他們禁止嫁娶,又叫人戒葷;就是神所造、叫那信而明白真道的人感謝著領受的。凡神所造之物都是好的,若感謝著領受,就沒有一樣可棄的,都因神的道和人的祈求成為聖潔了。你若將這些事提醒弟兄們,便是基督耶穌的好執事。他讀完就說:
But the Spirit says expressly that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and to doctrines of devils, in the hypocrisy of liars, having their conscience seared, forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful and by those who have known the truth; for every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be rejected which is received with thanksgiving, for it is sanctified by the word of God and by prayer. If you put the brethren in mind of these things, you shall be a good minister of Jesus Christ. And when he had read it, he said:
22:22
Ego hoc de uobis et de talibus, qui dicunt aliquam creaturam dei inmundam esse,\' et qui dicunt omnem concubitum, et qui fit cum uxore, fornicationem essehoc est enim quod ait "prohibentes nuptias" — per spiritum prophetiae designatum et expressum esse dico. tu autem si negas omnem concubitum fornicationem esse aut si dicis omnem cibum humanum licitum ad edendum concessum hominibus mundum esse, non es de illis, quos praedicauit et prophetauit apostolus. si autem inueniris in his, quae dixi, ecce habes apostolum Paulum destruentem et euacuantem doctrinam Manichaei futuri. itaque responde ad id, quod interrogo: omnis concubitus fornicatio est, an concubitus cum uxore non est peccatum? FEL.
我說,關於你們以及像你們這樣的人——你們說神所造的某些受造物是不潔的,又說一切交合,甚至與妻子的交合,都是姦淫(因為這正是他所謂「禁止嫁娶」的意思)——這是預言的靈所指明、所預告的。但你若否認一切交合都是姦淫,或說一切可食的人類食物都是潔淨的、准人食用,那麼你就不在使徒所宣告所預言的那些人之列。可是你若被發現正落在我所說的這些事上,看哪,你便有使徒保羅在此摧毀並廢除那將要出現之摩尼的教訓。所以請回答我所問的:一切交合都是姦淫呢,還是與妻子的交合不算為罪?斐利克斯。
I say that concerning you and such as you—who say that some creature of God is unclean, and who say that all intercourse, even that which takes place with a wife, is fornication (for this is what he means by 'forbidding to marry')—this was designated and set forth by the Spirit of prophecy. But if you deny that all intercourse is fornication, or if you say that all human food lawful to be eaten is granted to men as clean, then you are not among those whom the apostle proclaimed and prophesied. But if you are found among these things I have said, behold, you have the apostle Paul destroying and making void the doctrine of the Mani that was to come. Therefore answer to what I ask: is all intercourse fornication, or is intercourse with a wife not a sin? Felix.
22:23
dixit: Iterum mihi recitetur, quod dixit apostolus. et recitatum est: spiritus autem manifeste dicit quia in nouissimis temporibus recedent quidam a fide adtendentes spiritibus seductoribus, doctrinis daemoniorum in hypocrisi mendaciloquorum, cauteriatam habentes conscientiam suam, prohibentes nubere, abstinere a cibis, quos deus creauit ad percipiendum cum gratiarum actione fidelibus et his qui cognouerunt ueritatem, quia omnis creatura dei bona est et nihil abiciendum, quod cum gratiarum actione percipitur; sanctificatur enim per uerbum dei et orationem. haec praecipiens fratribus bonus eris minister Iesu Christi. FEL. dixit:
他說:請將使徒所說的話再讀給我聽。於是又讀道:聖靈明說,在末後的時候,必有人離棄真道,聽從那引誘人的邪靈和鬼魔的道理;這是因為說謊之人的假冒,他們的良心如同被熱鐵烙慣了一般。他們禁止嫁娶,又叫人戒葷;就是神所造、叫那信而明白真道的人感謝著領受的。凡神所造之物都是好的,若感謝著領受,就沒有一樣可棄的,都因神的道和人的祈求成為聖潔了。你若將這些事提醒弟兄們,便是基督耶穌的好執事。斐利克斯說:
Said: Let that which the apostle said be read to me again. And it was read again: But the Spirit says expressly that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and to doctrines of devils, in the hypocrisy of liars, having their conscience seared, forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful and by those who have known the truth; for every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be rejected which is received with thanksgiving, for it is sanctified by the word of God and by prayer. If you put the brethren in mind of these things, you shall be a good minister of Jesus Christ. Felix said:
22:24
Manichaeus non a fide recessit, sicut dicit Paulus, sicut ceteri recesserunt a fide quasi in sectam suam; Manichaeus autem a nulla secta recessit, ut dicatur, 5 quia a fide recessit. AUG. dixit: Quoniam te uideo nolle respondere ad quod interrogaris, ne inueniaris uel non tenere spiritum sanctum, quem iam probauimus missum esse apostolis, uel non esse in eorum numero, quos futuros Paulus designauit, ubi et uos ipsos prophetauit, breuiter respondeo: ut secundum tuum intellectum accipiam quod dixisti, "recedent a fide, quia non recedunt a fide nisi illi, qui fuerunt in aliqua fide;
摩尼並沒有像保羅所說的那樣離棄真道,不像其他人彷彿離棄真道而歸入自己的宗派;摩尼卻沒有離棄任何宗派,以致可說他離棄了真道。奧古斯丁說:既然我看出你不肯回答所問你的,唯恐你被發現或是不持守聖靈——我們已證明聖靈是差給使徒的——或是不在保羅所指明將要出現之人的數中,就是他預言你們自己的那些人之列,我便簡短地回答:好叫我照你的理解來領會你所說的話——「他們必離棄真道,因為除了曾在某種信仰中的人,沒有人會離棄真道;
Mani did not depart from the faith, as Paul says, as the others departed from the faith into their own sect, as it were; but Mani departed from no sect, so that it could be said that he departed from the faith. Augustine said: Since I see that you are unwilling to answer what you are asked, lest you be found either not to hold the Holy Spirit, whom we have already proved was sent to the apostles, or not to be in the number of those whom Paul designated as to come, where he also prophesied of you yourselves, I answer briefly: so that I may take according to your understanding what you said, 'They shall depart from the faith, since none depart from the faith except those who were in some faith;'
22:25
Manichaeus autem in nulla fide fuit, a qua recesserit, sed in qua fuit, in ea permansit," hoc te interrogo, utrum Manichaeus uel potius doctrina daemoniorum mendaciloquorum, quae fuit in Manichaeo, nullos christianos catholicos seduxerit, ut recederent a fide. si enim multi a uobis et per uos et per illam doctrinam seducuntur, ut recedant a fide et intendant spiritibus seductoribus, qualis in Manichaeo fuit, et incipiant dicere omnem concubitum esse fornicationemunde apostolus dicit: prohibentes nuptiaset incipiant dicere carnes, quas comedunt homines, non esse dei creaturam, sed daemonum facturam et esse inmunditiam:
但摩尼並不在任何信仰中,以致他能離棄它,反倒他從前在哪一種信仰中,就在那裡持守不變」——我要問你這事:摩尼,或更確切地說,摩尼裡面那說謊鬼魔的道理,是否從未引誘任何大公教會的基督徒,使他們離棄真道。因為若有許多人被你們、藉著你們、並藉著那道理所引誘,以致離棄真道、聽從那引誘人的邪靈(像摩尼裡面那樣),並開始說一切交合都是姦淫——使徒因此說「禁止嫁娶」——又開始說人所吃的肉不是神的受造物,乃是鬼魔所造的,且是污穢的:
but Mani was in no faith from which he could depart, but in the one in which he was, in that he remained,"—this I ask you: whether Mani, or rather the doctrine of the lying devils which was in Mani, has seduced no catholic Christians so as to make them depart from the faith. For if many are seduced by you and through you and through that doctrine, so as to depart from the faith and give heed to seducing spirits, such as was in Mani, and begin to say that all intercourse is fornication—whence the apostle says, 'forbidding to marry'—and begin to say that the flesh which men eat is not the creature of God, but the making of devils, and is uncleanness:
22:26
manifestum est de his praedixisse spiritum sanctum paracletum, qui erat in apostolo Paulo, quod recessuri erant a fide intendentes spiritibus seductoribus, qualis fuit in Manichaeo. iam ergo quia ego respondi, iustum est, ut tu respondeas ad quod interrogaui, utrum non dicas omnem concubitum esse fornicationem, aut si et hoc non uis respondere, ad illud, quod primo interrogaui, responde, ut probes Manichaeum esse apostolum Christi; aut si et hoc non uis, permitte me euacuare doctrinam ipsius, quod promisi, cum legeretur epistula ipsius, quam dicitis Fundamenti.\' FEL. dixit: Et ego respondeo ad quod dicit sanctitas tua, quia in Paulo uenit spiritus sanctus paracletus. AUG. dixit:
這就顯明,那在使徒保羅裡面的聖靈保惠師,曾預言關於這些人,說他們要離棄真道,聽從那引誘人的邪靈,像摩尼裡面那樣。如今既然我已回答,你理當回答我所問的:你是否不說一切交合都是姦淫;你若連這也不肯回答,就請回答我起初所問的,好證明摩尼是基督的使徒;你若連這也不肯,就容我照所應許的,使他的教訓歸於無效,正如在宣讀你們所稱「根基書」的那封信時我所說的。斐利克斯說:我回答你聖尊所說的,聖靈保惠師臨到了保羅。奧古斯丁說:
it is manifest that the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, who was in the apostle Paul, foretold concerning these that they would depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, such as was in Mani. Now therefore, since I have answered, it is just that you should answer what I asked: whether you do not say that all intercourse is fornication; or, if you are unwilling to answer even this, then answer that which I first asked, so as to prove that Mani is an apostle of Christ; or, if you are unwilling even for this, allow me to make void his doctrine, as I promised, when his epistle which you call 'of the Foundation' was being read. Felix said: And I answer to what your Holiness says, that the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, came in Paul. Augustine said:
22:27
Non in solo. FEL. dixit: Ego de ipso ago, quia, si in ipso, et in omnes.. et si in ipsoPaulus enim in altera epistula dicit: ex parte scimus et ex parte prophetamus; cum uenerit autem quod perfectum est, abolebuntur ea, quae ex parte dicta suntnos audientes Paulum hoc dicere, uenit Manichaeus cum praedicatione sua, et suscepimus eum secundum quod Christus dixit: mitto uobis spiritum sanctum. et Paulus uenit et dixit et ipse quia uenturus est, et postea -nemo uenit; ideo suscepimus Manichaeum. et quia uenit Manichaeus et per suam praedicationem docuit nos initium, medium et finem; docuit nos de fabrica mundi, quare facta est et unde facta est, et qui fecerunt;
不單在他裡面。斐利克斯說:我單論到他,因為若在他裡面,就在眾人裡面……而且若在他裡面——因為保羅在另一封信中說:「我們現在所知道的有限,所講的道也有限;等那完全的來到,這有限的必歸於無有」——我們聽見保羅這樣說,摩尼就帶著他的傳講來了,我們便照著基督所說「我差聖靈給你們」的話接待了他。保羅來了,他自己也說那位要來的必要來,此後卻無人來;所以我們接待了摩尼。並且因為摩尼來了,藉著他的傳講教導我們明白起初、中間、末後;他教導我們論到世界的構造,它為何被造、由何被造、誰造了它;
Not in him alone. Felix said: I treat of him, because if in him, then in all... And if in him—for Paul in another epistle says: 'We know in part and we prophesy in part; but when that which is perfect has come, those things which are said in part shall be done away'—we, hearing Paul say this, Mani came with his preaching, and we received him according to what Christ said: 'I send you the Holy Spirit.' And Paul came and himself also said that he is to come, and afterward no one came; therefore we received Mani. And because Mani came and through his preaching taught us the beginning, the middle, and the end; he taught us about the fabric of the world, why it was made and from what it was made, and who made it;
22:28
docuit nos quare dies et quare nox; docuit nos de cursu solis et lunae: quia hoc in Paulo non audiuimus nec in ceterorum apostolorum scripturis, hoc credimus, quia ipse est paracletus. itaque illud iterum dico, quod superius dixi: si audiero in altera scriptura, ubi paracletus loquitur, id est spiritus sanctus, de quo uoluero interrogare, et docueris me, credo et renuntio. AUG. dixit: Dicis ideo te non credere spiritum sanctum paracletum in Paulo apostolo fuisse, quia Paulus apostolus dixit: ex parte enim scimus et ex parte prophetamus, et inde putas apostolum per haec uerba praedixisse uelut alium uenturum post se, qui praedicaret omnia, quae iste non potuit, quia ex parte dicebat;
他教導我們為何有白晝、為何有黑夜;他教導我們論到日月的運行:因為這些我們在保羅那裡沒有聽見,在其餘使徒的著作中也沒有聽見,我們便信這事,就是他自己就是那保惠師。所以我再說我上面所說的:我若在別的經卷中聽見那保惠師、就是聖靈,論到我所要查問的事,而你能教導我,我就信服並棄絕舊道。奧古斯丁說:你說你之所以不信聖靈保惠師曾在使徒保羅裡面,是因為使徒保羅說「我們現在所知道的有限,所講的道也有限」,你便由此推測使徒藉這些話彷彿預言,說在他以後另有一位要來,那位要傳講這位所不能傳的一切,因為這位所講的有限;
he taught us why there is day and why there is night; he taught us about the course of the sun and moon: because we did not hear this in Paul nor in the writings of the other apostles, we believe this, that he himself is the Paraclete. And so I say again what I said above: if I hear in another Scripture, where the Paraclete speaks, that is, the Holy Spirit, concerning that about which I wish to inquire, and you teach me, I believe and renounce. Augustine said: You say that you therefore do not believe the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, was in the apostle Paul, because the apostle Paul said, 'For we know in part and we prophesy in part,' and from this you suppose that the apostle by these words foretold, as it were, that another was to come after him who would preach all the things which this one could not, because he spoke in part;
22:29
et hunc tu credis esse Manichaeum. primo ergo ex ipsa lectione apostoli ostendo. unde dicebat hoc apostolus. deinde, quia dixisti, quod Manichaeus uos docuerit initium, medium et finem et quomodo uel quare factus sit mundus, de cursu solis et lunae et de aliis, quae commemorasti, non legitur in euangelio dominum dixisse: mitto uobis paracletum, qui uos doceat de cursu solis et lunae. christianos enim facere uolebat, non mathematicos. sufficit autem, ut homines de his rebus, quantum in schola didicerunt, nouerint propter usus humanos. Christus autem uenturum paracletum dixit, qui inducat in omnem ueritatem; sed non ibi ait: initium, medium et finem; non ait: solis et lunae cursus.
而這位你相信就是摩尼。那麼,首先,我要從使徒的這段經文本身,指明使徒為何說這話。其次,既然你說摩尼教導了你起初、中間、末後,以及世界如何或為何被造、日月的運行和你所提及的其他事,福音書中並沒有讀到主曾說:「我差保惠師給你們,他要教導你們日月的運行。」因為他要使人作基督徒,不是作天文學家。人在這些事上,只要照他們在學校所學的程度知道,足以應人生活的用途,就夠了。但基督說保惠師要來,要引導人進入一切真理;然而他在那裡並沒有說:起初、中間、末後;也沒有說:日月的運行。
and this one you believe to be Mani. First, then, from the very reading of the apostle I will show why the apostle said this. Next, since you have said that Mani taught you the beginning, the middle, and the end, and how or why the world was made, about the course of the sun and moon and the other things you mentioned, it is not read in the Gospel that the Lord said: 'I send you the Paraclete, who shall teach you about the course of the sun and moon.' For he wished to make them Christians, not astronomers. It suffices that men should know of these matters, as far as they have learned in school, for human uses. But Christ said that the Paraclete would come, who would lead into all truth; but he did not there say: the beginning, the middle, and the end; he did not say: the course of the sun and moon.
22:30
aut si putas hanc doctrinam ad illam ueritatem pertinere, quam per spiritum sanctum Christus promisit, interrogo te, quot sint stellae. si accepisti spiritum illum, de quo dicis, ad quem pertinet docere ista, quae ego dico ad disciplinam et doctrinam christianam non pertinere, oportet. ut renunties et respondeas mihi. debitorem enim te fecisti, ut si quid de talibus interrogauero, si non responderis, non in te adpareat spiritus ille, de quo dictum est: inducet in omnem ueritatem, si illa est ueritas, quo ista pertinent.
但你若以為這道理是屬於基督藉聖靈所應許的那真理,我便問你:星有幾顆?你若領受了你所說的那靈,教導這些事既屬於他的職分——這些事我說是不屬於基督徒的訓誨與教訓的——那麼你就當回答並答覆我。因為你已使自己成了負債者,以致我若問及這類的事,你若不回答,那位靈就不顯在你裡面了;論到那靈曾有話說:「他要引導人進入一切真理」——倘若這些事所屬的果真是那真理的話。
But if you think that this doctrine pertains to that truth which Christ promised through the Holy Spirit, I ask you: how many are the stars? If you have received that Spirit of whom you speak, to whom it pertains to teach these things which I say do not pertain to Christian instruction and doctrine, then you ought to answer and reply to me. For you have made yourself a debtor, so that if I ask anything of such matters, and you do not answer, that Spirit does not appear in you, of whom it was said: 'He shall lead into all truth'—if that is the truth to which these things pertain.
22:31
itaque elige tibi, utrum uelis, et paratus sis mihi de his rebus respondere tamquam homo, qui accepisti spiritum, qui introducit in omnem ueritatem, et dicis, quia ad ipsam ueritatem pertinet scire ista mundana. itaque ego tibi possum ea dicere, quae pertinent ad doctrinam christianam; tu autem, qui putas ad eam pertinere, quomodo sit factus mundus et quae agantur in mundo, ad omnia mihi necesse est respondeas. sed plane cum responderis, probaturus es. sed antequam incipias dicere, si forte habes quod ille confinxerit, quem secutus es, doceam prius ego quod promisi, unde dicebat apostolus: ex parte scimus et ex parte prophetamus.
所以你自己揀選你所願的,並要預備好,作為一個領受了那引導人進入一切真理之靈的人,就這些事回答我;你既說知道這些屬世的事乃是屬於那真理本身。這樣,我固然能告訴你那些屬於基督徒教訓的事;但你既以為世界如何被造、世上有何事發生也屬於那教訓,就必須就這一切事回答我。不過顯然地,你回答之後,還得加以證明。但在你開口之前,唯恐你手中或有你所跟從之人所編造的什麼,讓我先教導我所應許的,就是使徒為何說:「我們所知道的有限,所講的道也有限。」
Therefore choose for yourself which you wish, and be prepared to answer me concerning these matters as a man who has received the Spirit that leads into all truth, and who says that it pertains to that very truth to know these worldly things. And so I can tell you the things which pertain to Christian doctrine; but you, who think that it pertains to it how the world was made and what is done in the world, must answer me concerning all things. But plainly, when you have answered, you shall have to prove it. But before you begin to speak, in case perhaps you have something which he whom you followed fabricated, let me first teach what I promised, namely, why the apostle said: 'We know in part and we prophesy in part.'
22:32
Dicebat enim, sicut lectio ipsa mox indicatura est, quia in ista uita homo cum est, non potest adsequi omnia, sed ex parte adsequitur in hac uita; ipse autem spiritus sanctus, qui ex parte docet in hac uita, post hanc uitam introducet in omnem ueritatem. quod ut apertissime doceatur, audi apostolum. et cum diceret, ex apostolo legit: siue autem prophetiae euacuabuntur siue linguae cessabunt siue scientia euacuabitur; ex parte enim scimus et ex parte prophetamus; cum autem uenerit quod perfectum est, quod ex parte est, euacuabitur. cum essem paruulus, loquebar quasi paruulus, sapiebam quasi paruulus, cogitabam quasi paruulus; cum autem factus sum uir, euacuaui, quae paruuli erant.
因為他所說的,正如所讀的經文即將顯明的,是說人在今生的時候,不能得著一切,只在今生得著一部分;但那在今生教導部分的聖靈自己,在今生之後要引導人進入一切真理。為使這事教導得極為明白,且聽使徒的話。他說了這話,就從使徒讀道:先知講道之能終必歸於無有,說方言之能終必停止,知識也終必歸於無有;因我們現在所知道的有限,先知所講的也有限;等那完全的來到,這有限的必歸於無有了。我作孩子的時候,話語像孩子,心思像孩子,意念像孩子;既成了人,就把孩子的事丟棄了。
For he said, as the reading itself will presently show, that while a man is in this life, he cannot attain to all things, but in this life attains in part; but the Holy Spirit himself, who in this life teaches in part, after this life will lead into all truth. And that this may be taught most plainly, hear the apostle. And when he had said this, he read from the apostle: But whether prophecies shall be done away, or tongues shall cease, or knowledge shall be done away; for we know in part and we prophesy in part; but when that which is perfect shall have come, that which is in part shall be done away. When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a man, I put away the things that were of a child.
22:33
uidemus enim nunc per speculum in aenigmate, tun autem facie ad faciem. et cum legeret, dixit: Iam dic mihi tu, si tempora futura Manichaei praedicebat apostolus, utrum tu uideas modo deum facie ad faciem. FEL. dixit: Non tantum ego possum contra tuam uirtutem, quia mira uirtus est gradus episcopalis, deinde contra leges imperatoris. et superius petiui compendiue, ut doceas me, quid est ueritas; et si docueris me, quid est ueritas, parebit quod teneo mendacium esse. AUG. dixit: Adparuit te probare non potuisse apostolum Christi esse Manichaeum; quare autem non potueris, breuiter expono.
我們如今彷彿對著鏡子觀看,模糊不清;到那時就要面對面了。他讀完這段就說:如今你告訴我,倘若使徒是在預言摩尼將來的時代,那麼你現今是否面對面看見神。斐利克斯說:我不能如此強力抵擋你的權能,因為主教的品級是一種奇妙的權能,其次又抵擋不過皇帝的律法。我在上面已簡短地求你教導我何為真理;你若教導我何為真理,就必顯明我所持守的乃是虛謊。奧古斯丁說:如今已顯明你不能證明基督的使徒就是摩尼;至於你為何不能,我要簡短地陳明。
For now we see through a mirror, in an enigma; but then face to face. And when he had read this, he said: Now tell me, if the apostle was foretelling the future times of Mani, whether you now see God face to face. Felix said: I cannot do so much against your power, for the rank of the episcopate is a wondrous power, and next against the laws of the emperor. And above I asked briefly, that you teach me what is truth; and if you teach me what is truth, it will be evident that what I hold is a lie. Augustine said: It has appeared that you could not prove that the apostle of Christ was Mani; and why you could not, I will briefly set forth.
22:34
dixisti inde te probare Manichaeum apostolum Christi, quia paracletum uenturum promisit Christus spiritum sanctum; et quia non inuenires, quando uenerit, quem Christus promisit, hinc te credere ipsum esse Manichaeum. at uero ubi probaui per scripturas sanctas, ecclesiasticas, canonicas, quando uenerit apertissime spiritus sanctus, quem uenturum promisit dominus Christus, conuertisti te, ut diceres debere tibi ostendi, quid docuerit et utrum Manichaei doctrinam euacuauerit.
你說你證明摩尼是基督的使徒,是根據這事:基督應許保惠師聖靈要來;因為你在他來的時候找不到基督所應許的那一位,於是你便相信摩尼自己就是那一位。但當我藉著聖的、屬教會的、正典的聖經,證明了主基督所應許要來的聖靈是何時極其明顯地來到之後,你就轉過來說,該向你顯明他教導了什麼,以及他是否使摩尼的教訓歸於無效。
You said that you proved Mani to be an apostle of Christ from this: that Christ promised the Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, was to come; and because you could not find, when he came, the one whom Christ promised, hence you believed that Mani himself was he. But when I proved through the holy, ecclesiastical, canonical Scriptures when the Holy Spirit came most manifestly, whom the Lord Christ promised would come, you turned yourself to say that it ought to be shown you what he taught, and whether he made void the doctrine of Mani.
22:35
cum ergo respondissem Manichaeum post apostolos fuisse in carne, illorum autem doctrinam, antequam Manichaeus natus esset, ab ipsis fuisse praedicatam, dixi tamen unum ipsorum apostolorum Paulum per spiritum sanctum, qui in omnes apostolos uenerat. prophetasse etiam de ista uestra doctrina, quia futura erat, et eam appellasse doctrinam daemoniorum mendaciloquorum . ubi ostendi ea, quae dixit Paulus futura in ipsa doctrina ad uestram professionem pertinere, id est prohibitionem nuptiarumquia omnem concubitum, et cum uxore, fornicationem esse dicitiset abstinentiam a cibis, quos deus creauitquia noui uos quosdam cibos dicere inmundos, cum ipse sequatur et dicat:
因此,當我已回答說摩尼在肉身上是在使徒之後,但使徒的教訓在摩尼出生之前就已由他們傳講了,我卻仍說,那些使徒中的一位、就是保羅,藉著那臨到眾使徒的聖靈,也預言了關於你們這道理,說它是將要出現的,並稱它為說謊鬼魔的道理。在那裡我指出,保羅所說將要出現在那道理中的事,正合乎你們的信條,就是禁止嫁娶——因為你們說一切交合,甚至與妻子的交合,都是姦淫——以及戒絕神所造的食物——因為我知道你們稱某些食物為不潔,儘管使徒接著自己就說:
When therefore I had answered that Mani was after the apostles in the flesh, but that their doctrine had been preached by them before Mani was born, I nevertheless said that one of those apostles, Paul, through the Holy Spirit who had come upon all the apostles, prophesied also concerning this doctrine of yours, that it was to come, and called it the doctrine of lying devils. Wherein I showed that the things which Paul said would be in that doctrine pertain to your profession, that is, the forbidding of marriage—since you say that all intercourse, even with a wife, is fornication—and abstinence from foods which God created—since I know that you call certain foods unclean, though he himself goes on and says:
22:36
omnis creatura dei bona estcum hic a te exigerem, ut responderes, dixisti Manichaeum docuisse uos initium, medium et finem et cursum solis et lunae et cetera talia; quae cum ego ostenderem ad christianam doctrinam non pertinere, respondisti apostolum ipsum Paulum dixisse, quia ex parte scit, ex parte prophetat. dixi nos non posse scire diuina. cum sumus in hac uita, et hic uidere per speculum et in aenigmate, tunc autem facie ad faciem, et quaesiui a te, si hoc putas dixisse apostolum Paulum, quod uenturus esset Manichaeus, qui doceret, quod non poterat Paulus, pertinere ad te, qui te dicis accepisse ipsum spiritum uidere modo deum facie ad faciem. quod quia non potes.
「凡神所造之物都是好的」——當我在此要求你回答時,你卻說摩尼教導了你起初、中間、末後,以及日月的運行和其他這類的事;當我指明這些不屬於基督徒的教訓時,你便回答說使徒保羅自己說過,他所知道的有限,所講的道也有限。我說,我們在今生活著的時候不能知道神聖的事,在此彷彿對著鏡子、模糊地觀看,到那時才要面對面;我便問你,你若以為使徒保羅說了這話——就是摩尼將要來、要教導保羅所不能教的——那麼你既自稱領受了那同一位靈,現今面對面看見神豈不是屬於你的分嗎?既然你不能,
'every creature of God is good'—when here I demanded of you that you answer, you said that Mani taught you the beginning, the middle, and the end, and the course of the sun and moon and other such things; and when I showed that these do not pertain to Christian doctrine, you answered that the apostle Paul himself said that he knows in part and prophesies in part. I said that we cannot know divine things while we are in this life, and that here we see through a mirror and in an enigma, but then face to face; and I asked of you, if you think the apostle Paul said this—that Mani was to come, who would teach what Paul could not—whether it pertains to you, who say that you have received that very Spirit, to see God now face to face. And since you cannot,
22:37
manifestum est apostolum Paulum de illa illa dixisse, de qua dicit et Iohannes: dilectissimi, filii dei sumus et nondum adparuit quid erimus; scimus enim quia cum adparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam uidebimus eum sicuti est. hoc tu cum audisses, dixisti te non ualere contra meam uirtutem . quae uirtus mea non est, sed si aliqua est, ab illo mihi data est ad redarguendos errores, qui uirtus est omnium fidelium suorum et pleno corde de se praesumentium.
這就顯明使徒保羅所說的,正是約翰所論到的那事:「親愛的弟兄啊,我們現在是神的兒女,將來如何,還未顯明;但我們知道,主若顯現,我們必要像他,因為必得見他的真體。」你聽見這話,就說你不能抵擋我的權能。這權能其實不是我的,若有的話,也是他賜給我用以駁斥謬誤的——這權能乃是屬於他一切信徒的、是屬於那些全心倚靠他而自信不疑之人的。
it is manifest that the apostle Paul spoke of that of which John also speaks: 'Beloved, we are the sons of God, and it does not yet appear what we shall be; but we know that when he shall appear, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.' When you had heard this, you said that you were not able to prevail against my power. Which is not my power, but if there is any, it was given to me by him for refuting errors—which is the power of all his faithful ones and of those who with full heart presume concerning themselves upon him.
22:38
dixisti etiam, quod te episcopalis terreat auctoritas, cum uideas, quanta pace inter nos agamus, quanta tranquillitate disputemus, quemadmodum populus praesens nullam tibi uim faciat, nullum terrorem incutiat, sed tranquillissimus audiat, sicut decet christianos. dixisti etiam timere leges imperatoris . hoc pro uera fide non timeret, quem spiritus sanctus inpleret; nam et Petrus apostolus in passione domini timuit et ter negauit; ubi autem eum paracletus, quem Christus promiserat, spiritus sanctus inpleuit, pro fide domini crucifixus est; et ille, qui primo habuit nega-. tionem timoris, postea inpleuit gloriosissimam passionem confessionis.
你又說主教的權柄使你懼怕,儘管你看見我們彼此間以何等的和平相處、以何等的平靜辯論,在場的百姓如何毫不向你施暴力、毫不使你驚恐,反倒極其平靜地聆聽,正合乎基督徒的體統。你又說你懼怕皇帝的律法。凡被聖靈充滿的人,斷不為真信仰而懼怕;因為連使徒彼得在主受難時也曾懼怕,三次不認主;但當基督所應許的那保惠師聖靈充滿他的時候,他就為主的信仰被釘十字架;那起先因懼怕而否認的人,後來卻成就了認信之最榮耀的殉道。
You also said that the authority of the episcopate frightens you, when you see with how much peace we conduct ourselves among us, with how much tranquility we dispute, how the people here present offer you no violence, strike into you no terror, but most tranquilly listen, as befits Christians. You also said that you feared the laws of the emperor. This one whom the Holy Spirit filled would not fear for the true faith; for even Peter the apostle feared in the Lord's passion and thrice denied him; but where the Paraclete, whom Christ had promised, the Holy Spirit, filled him, he was crucified for the faith of the Lord; and he who first had the denial of fear, afterward fulfilled the most glorious passion of confession.
22:39
tu itaque ex hoc ipso, quod timere te dixisti leges imperatoris, quamuis et de ceteris rebus satis adparet, quod non inueneris spiritum paracletum ueritatis, quia et si non timeres, aliis rebus conuincereris. FEL. dixit: Et apostoli timuerunt. AUG. dixit: Timuerunt, ut cauerent, non ut fidem suam conprehensi edicere dubitarent. tu ante iam hinc timere debuisti, ut non hic te inueniremus; iam in medio es . quare times, nisi quia quod dicas non habes? nam si imperatores timuisses. ante tacuisses.
所以你單從你所說懼怕皇帝律法這一事——雖然從其他事上也已足夠顯明——就顯出你並未尋見那保惠師、真理的靈;因為即便你不懼怕,也必被其他的事駁倒。斐利克斯說:使徒也曾懼怕。奧古斯丁說:他們懼怕是為要謹慎防備,而不是被拿住時仍猶疑不敢宣認自己的信仰。你早該為此懼怕,以致我們不會在這裡遇見你;如今你已置身其中。你為何懼怕,豈不是因為你無話可說嗎?因為你若懼怕諸皇帝,早就該先前緘默不言了。
You therefore, from this very fact that you said you fear the laws of the emperor—although also from the other matters it is sufficiently apparent—show that you have not found the Paraclete, the Spirit of truth; for even if you did not fear, you would be convicted by the other matters. Felix said: The apostles also feared. Augustine said: They feared so as to be on their guard, not so as to hesitate to declare their faith when seized. You ought long ago to have feared on this account, so that we should not have found you here; now you are in the midst of it. Why do you fear, unless because you have nothing to say? For if you had feared the emperors, you would have kept silent beforehand.
22:40
nunc uero cum hesterno die libellum curatori dederis et publice clamitaueris cum codicibus tuis te paratum esse incendi, si quid mali in ipsis fuerit inuentum, unde heri leges flagitabas quasi fortis, hodie ueritatem fugis ut timidus? FEL. dixit: Non ueritatem fugio. AUG. dixit: Dic ergo, si uides deum facie ad faciem secundum polliciationem tuam, quia dixisti apostolum Paulum de uobis dixisse, quia tam plenam ueritatem accepturi essetis, ut intellegamus uel credamus apostolum habuisse ex parte et te totum. FEL. dixit: Non ueritatem fugio, sed ueritatem quaero. quod tu dicis, quia non teneo, probetur mihi per scripturas deificas . hoc quaero iam. . AUG. dixit:
但如今,既然你昨日向管理官呈上了一份呈文,並帶著你的書卷公開喊叫,說若在其中發現任何邪惡之物,你甘願被焚燒——因此你昨日彷彿勇士般索求律法——今日你竟像膽怯的人逃避真理麼?斐利克斯說:我並不逃避真理。奧古斯丁說:那麼你就說,你是否照你所應許的面對面看見神——因為你說使徒保羅論到你們,說你們要領受如此完全的真理,以致我們可以明白或相信使徒所有的是一部分、而你所有的是全部。斐利克斯說:我並不逃避真理,乃是尋求真理。你說我所不持守的,請藉神聖的聖經向我證明。這正是我如今所尋求的。奧古斯丁說:
But now, since yesterday you gave a petition to the curator and publicly cried out with your books that you were prepared to be burned, if anything evil should be found in them—whence yesterday you demanded the laws as though a brave man—today do you flee from the truth as a timid man? Felix said: I do not flee from the truth. Augustine said: Then say, if you see God face to face according to your promise—for you said that the apostle Paul spoke of you, that you were to receive so full a truth that we might understand or believe that the apostle had it in part and you the whole. Felix said: I do not flee from the truth, but I seek the truth. What you say that I do not hold, let it be proved to me through the divine Scriptures. This is what I now seek. Augustine said:
22:41
Prius profitere te non potuisse probare Manichaeum apostolum Iesu Christi ; . et quantum potuero, cum omnia exstirpata fuerint contraria de corde tuo per ministerium meum donante domino, insero tibi quae sit scientia . ueritatis, quae perducat ad deum initians a fide. FEL. dixit: Quia hoc dicis tu, ut legem meam negem et alteram accipiam, meliorem dumtaxat, quod quaero ego, non hoc respondeo, ut legem meam negem, antequam alteram accipiam. AUG. dixit: Sed prius de uase funditur, quod aduersum habet, et sic inpletur, quod bonum est; aut si adhuc dubitas fundere, defende, quo plenus es.
你先承認你不能證明摩尼是耶穌基督的使徒;然後,就我所能及的,等一切相反之物藉我的職事、靠主的恩賜從你心中連根拔除之後,我要將那引人歸神、以信德為起點的真理知識栽種於你。斐利克斯說:既然你這樣說——要我否認我的律法而領受另一律法,只要它更好,這正是我所尋求的——我不這樣回答,以致在領受那另一律法之前先否認我的律法。奧古斯丁說:但器皿裡所盛相反之物必須先倒出來,那好的才得以充滿其中;不然,你若仍遲疑不肯倒出,那就為你所滿盛的辯護吧。
First profess that you could not prove that Mani is an apostle of Jesus Christ; and, as far as I shall be able, when all things contrary shall have been rooted out of your heart through my ministry, by the Lord's gift, I will graft into you what is the knowledge of the truth which leads to God, beginning from faith. Felix said: Since you say this—that I should deny my law and receive another, provided it be better, which is what I seek—I do not answer thus, so as to deny my law before I receive the other. Augustine said: But first that is poured out of a vessel which it holds contrary, and thus is filled up that which is good; or, if you still hesitate to pour out, defend that of which you are full.
22:42
ostendam enim tibi, quantum me dominus adiuuat, quanta inmunditia et blasphemiis plena sit doctrina Manichaei, si permittas, ut legatur illa epistula, de cuius initio iam tractauimus et non potuisti probare apostolum Christi esse Manichaeum. sed ideo moras innectis, ne cetera legantur, ubi aperte uestra sacrilegia deprehenduntur; ant si permittis, legantur. FEL. dixit: Permitto, quia dixisti omnia inmunda fundi et sic bona inmitti; hoc enim dictum est sanctitatis tuae. ad quod et ego dico: nullus aquam fundit, nisi alter adinpleuerit. AUG. dixit: Hoc uide quam inconsiderate dixeris, ut mitius loquar et non dicam insane. utique de uase tibi similitudinem posui;
因為我要向你顯明,就我所能、靠主幫助我的程度,摩尼的教訓充滿了何等的污穢與褻瀆,只要你容許宣讀那封書信——它的開頭我們已經處理過,而你不能證明摩尼是基督的使徒。但你正因這緣故編織拖延,唯恐下文被宣讀,因為在那裡你們的褻瀆罪行就要公然被察出;不然,你若容許,就讓它被宣讀吧。斐利克斯說:我容許,既然你說一切不潔之物都倒出來、好使美善之物注入;因為這是你聖尊所說的。對此我也說:若非別人先倒空,無人能注入水。奧古斯丁說:你看你說得多麼不加思量——好讓我說得溫和些,不說你是瘋狂的。我確是用器皿的比喻向你陳明的;
For I will show you, as much as the Lord helps me, with how much uncleanness and blasphemies the doctrine of Mani is full, if you permit that epistle to be read, of whose beginning we have already treated, and you could not prove that Mani is an apostle of Christ. But for this reason you weave delays, lest the rest be read, where your sacrileges are openly detected; or, if you permit, let them be read. Felix said: I permit, since you said that all unclean things are poured out and thus good things are put in; for this was said by your Holiness. To which I too say: no one pours in water, unless another has emptied it. Augustine said: See how inconsiderately you have spoken, to speak more mildly and not say insanely. Surely I set before you the likeness from a vessel;
22:43
in uas plenum nemo potest aliquid mittere, nisi fundatur illud, quo plenum erat. FEL. dixit: Unum dixisti et ego dixi duo. AUG. dixit: Si duo uasa dixisti, uis illum parem tuum fundimus et inplemus illum, ut possis tu fundere, quod habes ? FEL. dixit: Ambo unam aquam habemus. AUG. dixit: Cum ergo ambo pleni sitis aqua uestra, quid inplebimus, ut doceamus uos, nisi aliquis uestrum fuderit, quod habet? aut si bonum est et ideo debet teneri, ut defendatur et legatur illa epistula, uideamus, si uel cetera possunt defendi, si in ipso initio defecisti; aut si dicis te in illo non defecisse, proba nobis quomodo sit Manichaeus apostolus Christi. FEL. dixit:
沒有人能把任何東西放進一個已滿的器皿,除非把它所盛滿的先倒出來。斐利克斯說:你說一個,我卻說兩個。奧古斯丁說:你若說是兩個器皿,你可願意我們倒空你那同伴的器皿並把它充滿,好使你能倒出你所有的麼?斐利克斯說:我們兩個都盛著同一種水。奧古斯丁說:那麼,既然你們兩個都盛滿了你們自己的水,我們要充滿什麼、好教導你們呢,除非你們中有一位倒出他所盛的?不然,若那是美善的、因此當被保守,以致那封書信可以被辯護、被宣讀,就讓我們看看下文至少能否被辯護,倘若你在它的開頭就已失敗了;不然,你若說你在那裡並未失敗,就向我們證明摩尼如何是基督的使徒。斐利克斯說:
into a full vessel no one can put anything, unless that with which it was full is poured out. Felix said: You said one, and I said two. Augustine said: If you said two vessels, do you wish that we empty your fellow vessel and fill it, so that you can pour out what you have? Felix said: We both have one water. Augustine said: Since therefore you are both full of your own water, what shall we fill, that we may teach you, unless one of you pours out what he has? Or, if it is good and therefore ought to be kept, so that that epistle may be defended and read, let us see whether the rest at least can be defended, if you have failed at its very beginning; or, if you say that you did not fail in it, prove to us how Mani is an apostle of Christ. Felix said:
22:44
Christus dixit spiritum sanctum missurum se, qui in omnem ueritatem inducat. AUG. dixit: Si habes illum, adtende, quod te iamdudum interrogaui. dixisti enim ad ipsius doctrinam pertinere etiam ista mundana cognoscere . dic mihi: quot sunt stellae, si introductus es in istam omnem ueritatem? FEL. dixit: Et ego dico, quia, si paracletus per apostolos locutus est, et per Paulum; et ego peto sanctitatem tuam, ut illa mihi ostendas, quae iam dixi. AUG. dixit: Confitere te non potuisse ostendere, quod ego interrogaui, et ostendam secundum scripturas, quod pertineat ad fidem christianam. FEL. dixit:
基督說他要差聖靈來,那位要引導人進入一切真理。奧古斯丁說:你若有他,就留心我方才所問你的。因為你說知道這些屬世的事也屬於他的教訓。告訴我:星有幾顆,倘若你已被引導進入那全部真理?斐利克斯說:我也說,倘若保惠師藉眾使徒說話,就也藉保羅說話;我也求你的聖尊,將我已提及的那些事指給我看。奧古斯丁說:你承認你不能顯明我所問的,我便要照聖經顯明何為屬於基督徒信仰的事。斐利克斯說:
Christ said that he would send the Holy Spirit, who leads into all truth. Augustine said: If you have him, attend to what I asked you a while ago. For you said that to know these worldly things also pertains to his doctrine. Tell me: how many are the stars, if you have been led into that whole truth? Felix said: I too say that, if the Paraclete spoke through the apostles, then also through Paul; and I ask your Holiness to show me those things which I have already mentioned. Augustine said: Confess that you could not show what I asked, and I will show, according to the Scriptures, what pertains to the Christian faith. Felix said:
22:45
Et ego, si ad.tuleris mihi scripturas Manichaei, quinque auctores, quos tibi dixi, quicquid me interrogaueris, probo tibi. AUG. dixit: De ipsis quinque auctoribus est ista epistula, cuius aperuimus principium et inuenimus ibi scriptum: Manichaeus apostolus Christi Iesu . et uideo, quia ipsum non mihi principium exponis, quia non probas, quomodo sit Manichaeus apostolus Iesu Christi. FEL. dixit: Si in ista non probo, in secundo probo. AUG. dixit: In quo secundo? FEL. dixit: In Thesauro. AUG. dixit: Thesaurum istum, quem ideo tali nomine appellatis, ut miseros seducatis, quis scripsit ? Manichaeus . nolo mihi ab illo probes: quia ipse Manichaeus mentitur dicendo se esse, quod non est. FEL.
我也如此,你若把摩尼的著作、就是我對你所提名的那五位作者的書帶給我,無論你問我什麼,我都要向你證明。奧古斯丁說:這封書信正出於那五位作者,我們已打開了它的開頭,並在那裡找到寫著:「摩尼,基督耶穌的使徒。」我看出你並不向我解說那開頭本身,因為你證明不出摩尼如何是耶穌基督的使徒。斐利克斯說:我若在這一本裡證明不出,就在第二本裡證明。奧古斯丁說:在哪個第二本裡?斐利克斯說:在《寶藏》裡。奧古斯丁說:這《寶藏》,你們以這樣的名字稱它,為要迷惑那些可憐的人,是誰寫的呢?摩尼。我不要你從他那裡向我證明:因為摩尼自己就說謊,說自己是他所不是的。斐利克斯。
And I too, if you bring me the Scriptures of Mani, the five authors whom I named to you, whatever you ask me, I will prove to you. Augustine said: Of those same five authors is this epistle, whose beginning we opened, and we found written there: 'Mani, an apostle of Christ Jesus.' And I see that you do not expound to me that very beginning, because you do not prove how Mani is an apostle of Jesus Christ. Felix said: If I do not prove it in this one, I prove it in the second. Augustine said: In what second? Felix said: In the Treasure. Augustine said: This 'Treasure,' which you call by such a name in order to seduce the wretched, who wrote it? Mani. I will not have you prove it to me from him: because Mani himself lies by saying that he is what he is not. Felix.
22:46
dixit: Tu mihi proba per alterum. AUG. dixit: Quid uis tibi probem? FEL. dixit: Quia mentitur Manichaeus. AUG. dixit: Quia tu non potes probare uerum dicere Manichaeum, oportet, ut ego probem mentitum Manichaeum esse? FEL. dixit: Quare non potui probare? numquid prolatae sunt scripturae, quas ego petiui, et non probaui? AUG. dixit: Sed scripturas Manichaei petis, quibus fidem non habemus; aliunde proba. ego autem de ipsa scriptura Manichaei tibi probo mentitum esse Manichaeum et blasphemasse Manichaeum. FEL. dixit: Afferantur libri. AUG. dixit: Praesens est epistula Manichaei, quam dicitis Fundamenti. initium nullum est in aedificio, nisi fundamentum .
他說:請你藉另一部書向我證明。奧古斯丁說:你要我向你證明什麼?斐利克斯說:證明摩尼說謊。奧古斯丁說:既然你不能證明摩尼說真話,難道就必得我來證明摩尼說了謊麼?斐利克斯說:我為何不能證明?我所求的聖經豈曾被拿出來、而我卻證明不出麼?奧古斯丁說:可是你所求的是摩尼的著作,我們對它並不置信;請你從別處證明。而我卻要從摩尼的著作本身,向你證明摩尼說了謊、摩尼褻瀆了。斐利克斯說:把那些書拿出來吧。奧古斯丁說:你們所稱「根基書」的那封摩尼書信就在這裡。除了根基以外,建築物並無別的開端。
Said: Prove it to me through another. Augustine said: What do you wish me to prove to you? Felix said: That Mani lies. Augustine said: Since you cannot prove that Mani speaks the truth, is it necessary that I prove that Mani has lied? Felix said: Why could I not prove it? Were the Scriptures which I asked for brought forth, and did I not prove it? Augustine said: But you ask for the Scriptures of Mani, in which we place no faith; prove it from elsewhere. But I, from that very Scripture of Mani, prove to you that Mani lied and that Mani blasphemed. Felix said: Let the books be brought forth. Augustine said: The epistle of Mani which you call 'of the Foundation' is here present. There is no beginning in a building except the foundation.
22:47
si eum ostendero in ipso fundamento ruinam fecisse, ceteram eius constructionem ut quid quaerimus? FEL. dixit: Hoc dicis in ipsam ostendens ruinam esse . et ego dico, da arbitros, quantos et tu habes, et tibi probo, quia non mentitur. AUG. dixit: Absit a nobis et a genere humano, ut quantos hic uides, tantos uideas Manichaeos. FEL. dixit : Da, dixi, quae a te petiui. AUG. dixit: Quos uis ergo, ut dem tibi ? FEL. dixit: Quos tu uolueris. AUG. dixit: Ego istos do; si habes meliores, pete. FEL. dixit: Quomodo istos das? AUG. dixit: Praesentes, qui nos audiunt. FEL. dixit: Isti mihi non fauent. AUG. dixit: Ergo tu tales quaeris, qui tibi faueant, non qui ueritati ? FEL dixit:
我若證明它在根基本身上已造成傾覆,何必再探究它其餘的建構呢?斐利斯說:你這樣說,是指出傾覆在根基本身裡;但我說,請提供仲裁人,你所有的有多少就提供多少,我便向你證明他並沒有說謊。奧古斯丁說:願我們並全人類都遠離這事,就是你在此看見多少人,就以為看見那麼多摩尼教徒。斐利斯說:我說,請提供我向你所求的。奧古斯丁說:那麼你要我給你哪些人呢?斐利斯說:你所願意的那些人。奧古斯丁說:我就給這些人;你若有更好的,便求吧。斐利斯說:你如何給這些人?奧古斯丁說:就是在場聆聽我們的這些人。斐利斯說:這些人不偏袒我。奧古斯丁說:那麼你所尋找的,是偏袒你的人,而不是偏袒真理的人嗎?斐利斯說:
If I show that it made its ruin in the very foundation, why do we investigate the rest of its structure? FELIX said: You say this pointing out that the ruin is in the foundation itself; but I say, provide arbiters, as many as you too have, and I will prove to you that he does not lie. AUGUSTINE said: Far be it from us and from the human race that you should see as many Manichaeans as you see here. FELIX said: Provide, I said, what I asked of you. AUGUSTINE said: Whom then do you wish me to give you? FELIX said: Whomever you shall wish. AUGUSTINE said: I give these; if you have better ones, ask for them. FELIX said: How do you give these? AUGUSTINE said: Those present, who are listening to us. FELIX said: These do not favour me. AUGUSTINE said: So then you seek such men as favour you, not such as favour the truth? FELIX said:
22:48
Qui me audiant et non tantum me, sed et ipsam scripturam, ut probetur, an uerum dicit, an mentitur. AUG. dixit: Uides ergo, quia audiunt. legamus cetera, quia tu istam epistulam Manichaei esse confessus es. FEL. dixit: Non nego. AUG. dixit: Ergo legatur. FEL. dixit: Arbitros non habeo. et adiecit: legatur caput ipsius. et cum legeretur et uentum esset ad locum, ubi scriptum habet eadem epistula: pax uobis inuisibilis et ueritatis notitia sit cum fratribus suis et carissimis, qui mandatis caelestibus credunt pariter atque deseruiunt; sed et dextera luminis tueatur et eripiat uos ab omni incursione maligna et a laqueo mundi;
就是那些將聽我的人,且不只聽我,也要聽聖經本身,好使人得以查驗他所說的是真是假。奧古斯丁說:那麼你看見他們正在聆聽。讓我們讀其餘的部分,因為你已承認這封信是摩尼所寫。斐利斯說:我不否認。奧古斯丁說:那麼就讓它被誦讀。斐利斯說:我沒有仲裁人。他又說:讓其開頭被誦讀。當人誦讀,讀到那封信寫著的地方:「願不可見的平安歸於你們,願真理的知識與他的弟兄和至親同在,他們同樣相信天上的誡命並服事它們;願光明的右手護衛你們,救你們脫離一切惡毒的侵襲和世界的網羅;」
Men who will hear me, and not only me, but also the Scripture itself, so that it may be tested whether he speaks the truth or lies. AUGUSTINE said: You see then that they are listening. Let us read the rest, since you have confessed that this letter is Manichaeus's. FELIX said: I do not deny it. AUGUSTINE said: Then let it be read. FELIX said: I have no arbiters. And he added: Let its heading be read. And when it was being read and they had come to the place where the same letter has written: "Peace to you, invisible peace, and may the knowledge of the truth be with his brethren and dearly beloved, who believe alike in the heavenly commandments and serve them; but also may the right hand of the light guard you and snatch you from every malignant assault and from the snare of the world;"
22:49
pietas uero spiritus sancti intima pectoris uestri adaperiat, ut ipsis oculis uideatis uestras animas, Felix dixit: Da scripturam, quae ista redarguat. .AUG. dixit: Adhuc nihil mali audiuimus, nisi quod ausus est Manichaeus apostolum se Christi nominare. nam ea, quae dixit, adhuc ad tectorium fallaciae pertinent et ad ouinam pellem, quibus eis prius dicit uerba bona, ut possit introducere mala. sed quid uelit introducere per haec uerba, uideamus. si enim aliquid mali introduxerit, et ista uerba mala erunt et seductoria; si autem aliquid boni in posterioribus et ueri dixerit, necessitate conprehendemus. permitte ergo legantur sequentia. FEL. dixit:
願聖靈的虔敬打開你們胸中最深處,使你們親眼看見自己的靈魂」——斐利斯說:請給我一段駁斥這些話的聖經。奧古斯丁說:迄今我們尚未聽見任何惡的,除了摩尼膽敢自稱為基督的使徒之外。因為他所說的話仍屬於欺騙的粉飾,屬於羊皮外衣,藉此他先向人說善言,好能引進惡事。但讓我們看他要藉這些話引進什麼。因為他若引進某惡事,那麼那些話也是惡的、誘惑人的;但他若在後文說出某善且真的事,我們就必被迫承認。所以請准許誦讀下文。斐利斯說:
and may the piety of the Holy Spirit open the innermost recesses of your breast, that with your very eyes you may see your own souls" — Felix said: Give me a Scripture that refutes these things. AUGUSTINE said: As yet we have heard nothing evil, except that Manichaeus dared to call himself an apostle of Christ. For the things he said still pertain to the plaster of deceit and to the sheep's skin, whereby he first speaks good words to men, that he may be able to introduce evil ones. But let us see what he wishes to introduce through these words. For if he introduces something evil, then those words too will be evil and seductive; but if in what follows he says something good and true, we shall be compelled by necessity. Permit therefore the following to be read. FELIX said:
22:50
Si ergo adseris, quia in primo bona ponuntur et postea mala inmittuntur, quomodo ego tibi possum credere, cum mihi primo bona dixeris? AUG. dixit: Ego adhuc ista nec bona dixi nec mala. nihil mali adhuc audiuimus, dixi; non dixi: iam aliquid boni audiuimus. malum enim illud solum dixi, quod ausus est dicere se apostolum Christi. uerba uero, quae dixit in consequentibus, tunc erunt mala, si mali aliquid introduxerint; tunc erunt bona, si boni aliquid introduxerint. permitte ergo, ut sequentia legantur . quare times? FEL. dixit: Non timeo. AUG. dixit: Permitte ergo, ut legantur. FEL. dixit: Legantur. Et cum legeretur et uentum esset ad locum, ubi scriptum habet:
那麼你若斷言善的先擺在前面、惡的隨後才被暗中引進,那麼你既先向我說了善言,我怎能相信你呢?奧古斯丁說:我迄今尚未稱那些話為善或為惡。我說我們迄今尚未聽見任何惡;我並沒有說:我們已經聽見某善事。因為我所提及唯一的惡,就是他膽敢自稱為基督的使徒。至於他在後文所說的話,若引進某惡,便是惡的;若引進某善,便是善的。所以請准許誦讀下文。你為何害怕?斐利斯說:我不害怕。奧古斯丁說:那麼請准許誦讀它們。斐利斯說:讓它們被誦讀。當人誦讀,讀到那寫著的地方:
If then you assert that good things are placed first and evil things are afterwards insinuated, how can I believe you, when you have first spoken good things to me? AUGUSTINE said: I have as yet called those things neither good nor evil. I said we have as yet heard nothing evil; I did not say: we have already heard something good. For the only evil thing I mentioned was that he dared to say he was an apostle of Christ. But the words he spoke in what follows will then be evil, if they introduce something evil; they will then be good, if they introduce something good. Permit therefore that the following be read. Why are you afraid? FELIX said: I am not afraid. AUGUSTINE said: Permit therefore that they be read. FELIX said: Let them be read. And when it was being read and they had come to the place where it has written:
22:51
ita autem fundata sunt eiusdem splendidissima regna super lucidam et beatam terram, ut a nullo umquam aut moueri aut concuti possint, Augustinus dixit: Terram istam quam dicit, unde habebat? fecit eam, an genuit eam, an aequalis et coaeterna illi erat? istam dico terram, lucidam et beatam quam dicit. FEL. dixit: Quomodo scriptum est: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram et terra erat inuisibilis et coinquinabilis et incomposita. ego ita intellego: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram et terra erat, quasi duae terrae mihi uidentur esse, secundum quod Manichaeus dicit duo regna. AUG. dixit:
「同樣,那一位最輝煌的諸國度乃奠基於那光明而蒙福的地上,以致無人任何時候能使它們移動或動搖」——奧古斯丁說:他所說的這地,是從何而來?是他造的,還是他生的,還是與他同等且同永恆的?我所指的是他所說那光明而蒙福的地。斐利斯說:正如所記:「起初神造天地,地是不可見的、被玷污的、無形的。」我如此理解:「起初神造天地,地是」——在我看來彷彿有兩個地,正如摩尼所說有兩個國度。奧古斯丁說:
"And so the most splendid realms of the same one were founded upon the shining and blessed earth, so that they can never be moved or shaken by anyone" — Augustine said: This earth of which he speaks, whence did he have it? Did he make it, or beget it, or was it equal and coeternal with him? I mean this earth, the shining and blessed one of which he speaks. FELIX said: As it is written: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth, and the earth was invisible and defiled and unformed." I understand it thus: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth, and the earth was" — there seem to me to be, as it were, two earths, according to what Manichaeus says of two kingdoms. AUGUSTINE said:
22:52
Quia scripturam commemorasti nostram, quam soletis blasphemare, ad me pertinet exponere illam et ostendere tibi sine blasphemia esse illud scriptum et cum ueritate et non secundum Manichaeum, ut deinde tu uel in secundis mihi respondeas, quod interrogaui. FEL. dixit: Respondeo. AUG. dixit: Quod scriptum est: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, breuiter conplexa est scriptum, quid fecerit deus. deinde quia nondum adparebat haec terra, quam fecerat, antequam eam distingueret et ornaret, qualem terram "fecerat deus, secuta scriptura exposuit, qualis terra erat, de qua dixerat: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram; tamquam, cum audissemus:
你既引用了我們的聖經,就是你們慣於褻瀆的,那闡釋它、並向你證明所記載的乃無褻瀆、合乎真理、且非照摩尼所言的,便是我的職責,好使你至少在其次能回答我所問的。斐利斯說:我回答。奧古斯丁說:所記載的「起初神造天地」,聖經簡要地包括了神所造的。然後,因為神所造的這地,在他區分並裝飾它之前尚未顯現,神造了何等的地,隨後的聖經便闡明那地是何等模樣,就是它先前所說「起初神造天地」的那地;彷彿當我們聽見:
Since you have cited our Scripture, which you are wont to blaspheme, it belongs to me to expound it and to show you that what is written is without blasphemy and in accord with truth, and not according to Manichaeus, so that then, at least in the second place, you may answer me what I asked. FELIX said: I answer. AUGUSTINE said: What is written, "In the beginning God made heaven and earth," the Scripture briefly comprehended what God had made. Then, because this earth which he had made did not yet appear before he distinguished and adorned it, of what sort of earth God had made, the following Scripture set forth what the earth was like, concerning which it had said: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth"; as though, when we had heard:
22:53
in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, quaereremus, qualem terram, subiecit et ait: terra autem, id est illa, quam fecerat deus, inuisibilis erat et incomposita. non ergo duas terras dixit, sed qualis illa fuerit exposuit. tu itaque responde nunc mihi, quod breuiter interrogaui: terra ista lucida et beata, quam dicit Manichaeus, supra quam fundata erant regna dei, ab ipso deo facta erat, an genita de illo erat, an coaeterna illi erat ? unum de tribus, nisi molestum est, sine tergiuersatione responde. FEL.. dixit : Ipsa se scriptura interpretatur. AUG. dixit:
「起初神造天地」,我們便該問,是何等的地?——它接著說:「但地」,即神所造的那地,「是不可見的、無形的。」所以它並非說有兩個地,而是闡明那地是何等模樣。因此現在請你回答我所簡要問的:摩尼所說那光明而蒙福的地,就是神諸國度奠基其上的,究竟是神自己所造的,還是從他所生的,還是與他同永恆的?三者取其一,若不覺為難,請無所推諉地回答。斐利斯說:聖經本身自作解釋。奧古斯丁說:
"In the beginning God made heaven and earth," we should ask, what sort of earth? — it subjoined and said: "But the earth," that is, that which God had made, "was invisible and unformed." It did not therefore speak of two earths, but set forth of what sort that one was. You therefore now answer me what I briefly asked: this shining and blessed earth of which Manichaeus speaks, upon which the realms of God were founded, was it made by God himself, or was it begotten of him, or was it coeternal with him? One of the three, if it is not troublesome, answer without evasion. FELIX said: The Scripture itself interprets itself. AUGUSTINE said:
22:54
Si ergo nosti esse hic aliquem locum, ubi hoc dicat scriptura, quia illam terram uel genuit deus uel fecit uel coaeterna illi erat, aperi ad locum, quem nosti, et lege mihi.- FEL. dixit: Non est in ista scriptura, sed in altera. AUG. dixit: Credo ergo, quia, si qua est illa scriptura, meministi, quid ibi dixerit. itaque tu mihi responde, qui nosti illam scripturam; et si dixero, quia non sic habet, conuinces me. si autem sic cognouero, secundum hoc disputo, quod tu ipse responderis,. dic ergo, an fecerit terram istam deus, an genuerit, an coaeterna illi fuerit, qui legisti in nescio quo libro, ubi esse hoc scriptum dicis. FEL. dixit:
那麼你若知道此處有某段經文,聖經在其中說神生了那地,或造了那地,或那地與他同永恆,就請翻到你所知道的地方,讀給我聽。斐利斯說:不在這段聖經裡,而在另一段。奧古斯丁說:那麼我相信,若真有那段聖經,你記得它在那裡所說的。因此請你——你既知道那段聖經——回答我;我若說它並非如此記載,你便可駁倒我。但我若認出確是如此,我便按你自己所回答的來論辯。所以請說,神是造了這地,還是生了它,還是它與他同永恆——你既在某本我不知道的書中讀過,你說那裡如此記載。斐利斯說:
If then you know there is here some place where Scripture says this, that God either begot that earth or made it or that it was coeternal with him, open to the place you know and read it to me. FELIX said: It is not in this Scripture, but in another. AUGUSTINE said: I believe then that, if there is any such Scripture, you remember what it said there. So then you answer me, you who know that Scripture; and if I say that it does not read so, you will convict me. But if I recognize that it is so, I argue according to that which you yourself have answered. Say therefore whether God made this earth, or begot it, or it was coeternal with him — you who have read in I know not what book where you say this is written. FELIX said:
22:55
Quia modo sanctitas tua interpretata est scripturam tuam, quomodo uoluisti et acceptaui, et tu sic mihi . accepta, quicquid dixero. AUG. dixit: Interim quod interrogaui, si nihil me contra mouerit, accepto; si autem aliquid mouerit, motum meum indico tibi, ut ad ipsum respondeas. FEL. dixit: Ego non respondi ad tua dicta.- AUG. dixit: Quia prius est, ut mihi ad id, quod interrogaui, respondeas, tamen feci etiam, ut tibi prior respondeam . forte non te mouit; ideo non respondisti . forte et me non mouebit, cum responderis. responde ergo ad quod interrogaui. FEL. dixit: Respondeo. et adiecit:
既然方才你的聖德已照你所願闡釋了你自己的聖經,而我接受了,你也照樣為我這樣做:接受我所要說的一切。奧古斯丁說:與此同時,關於我所問的,若沒有什麼使我起疑,我便接受;但若有什麼使我起疑,我便向你陳明我的疑難,好使你能回答它。斐利斯說:我尚未回答你的陳述。奧古斯丁說:因為首要的乃是你當就我所問的回答我,然而我甚至已安排要先回答你。或許它並未使你起疑,所以你沒有回答。或許當你回答後,它也不會使我起疑。所以請回答我所問的。斐利斯說:我回答。他又說:
Since just now your Holiness has interpreted your own Scripture as you wished, and I accepted it, so you too do the same for me: accept whatever I shall say. AUGUSTINE said: Meanwhile, as to what I asked, if nothing moves me against it, I accept; but if something moves me, I shall declare my difficulty to you, so that you may answer it. FELIX said: I have not answered your statements. AUGUSTINE said: Because the prior thing is that you should answer me as to what I asked, nevertheless I have arranged even to answer you first. Perhaps it did not move you; therefore you did not answer. Perhaps it will not move me either, when you have answered. Answer therefore what I asked. FELIX said: I answer. And he added:
22:56
dixisti ergo de terra illa, in qua deus habetur, an facta est ab illo, an generauit illam, an coaeterna illi est. et ego dico, quia, quomodo deus aeternus est et factura apud illum nulla est, totum aeternum est.. AUG. dixit: Non illam ergo genuit neque fecit? FEL. dixit: Non, sed est illi coaeterna. AUG. dixit: Si autem genuisset illam, non illi esset coaeterna. FEL. dixit: Quod nascitur, finem habet; quod innatum est, non habet finem. AUG. dixit: Quibus ergo erat ille pater aut cuius erat pater, , quem modo patrem nominauit? si enim nihil genuerat, pater esse non poterat. FEL. dixit: Sed sunt alia, quae generauit. AUG. dixit:
那麼你問及那地——就是神所在的地——究竟是他所造的,還是他生了它,還是它與他同永恆。我說,正如神是永恆的,且在他那裡並無任何被造之物,全體都是永恆的。奧古斯丁說:那麼他既沒有生它,也沒有造它?斐利斯說:沒有,但它與他同永恆。奧古斯丁說:然而他若曾生了它,它便不會與他同永恆。斐利斯說:凡受生的都有終結;凡非受生的都沒有終結。奧古斯丁說:那麼他是誰的父,或作誰的父,就是你方才稱為父的那位?因為他若什麼都沒有生,便不能是父。斐利斯說:但另有些是他所生的。奧古斯丁說:
You have therefore asked concerning that earth in which God is held, whether it was made by him, or he begot it, or it is coeternal with him. And I say that, just as God is eternal and there is with him nothing made, the whole is eternal. AUGUSTINE said: He neither begot it then nor made it? FELIX said: No, but it is coeternal with him. AUGUSTINE said: But if he had begotten it, it would not be coeternal with him. FELIX said: What is born has an end; what is unborn has no end. AUGUSTINE said: Of whom then was he the father, or whose father was he, whom just now you named father? For if he had begotten nothing, he could not be a father. FELIX said: But there are other things which he begot. AUGUSTINE said:
22:57
Illa ergo, quae generauit, non sunt illi coaeterna, an et ipsa coaeterna sunt? FEL. dixit: Coaeterna sunt illi quicquid deus generauit. AUG. dixit: Ergo errasti, quod superius dixisti: omne quod nascitur, finem habet. FEL. dixit: Interim, quia secundum generationem carnis locutus sum, erraui. AUG. dixit: Modestissime confessus errorem merearis intellegere ueritatem. FEL. dixit: Faciat deus. AUG. dixit: Adtende ergo iam, ut incipias cognoscere errorem scripturae huius. si quae genuit deus, coaeterna non sunt illi, melior est terra illa, quam non generauit deus, ubi habitant omnia, quae generauit deus; quam terram dicis ab eo non generatam. FEL. dixit:
那麼他所生的那些,是否與他同永恆,還是它們也是同永恆的?斐利斯說:凡神所生的都與他同永恆。奧古斯丁說:那麼你先前所說的便錯了:凡受生的都有終結。斐利斯說:目前而言,我錯了,因為我是按肉體的生育而說的。奧古斯丁說:你既如此謙遜地承認錯誤,願你配得明白真理。斐利斯說:願神成全。奧古斯丁說:那麼現在請留意,好使你開始認出這段經文的錯誤。神所生的那些,若不與他同永恆,那麼那神未曾生的地便更為優越,一切神所生的都住在那裡——你說那地並非他所生的。斐利斯說:
Those things then which he begot, are they not coeternal with him, or are they too coeternal? FELIX said: Whatever God begot is coeternal with him. AUGUSTINE said: Then you erred in what you said above: everything that is born has an end. FELIX said: For the moment, I erred, because I spoke according to the generation of the flesh. AUGUSTINE said: Confessing your error most modestly, may you deserve to understand the truth. FELIX said: May God grant it. AUGUSTINE said: Attend then now, that you may begin to recognize the error of this Scripture. If the things which God begot are not coeternal with him, then that earth is better, which God did not beget, where dwell all the things which God begot — which earth you say was not begotten by him. FELIX said:
22:58
Coaequantur sibi omnia, et quae generauit et quae non generauit, id est terra illa, ubi commorabatur. AUG. dixit: Quid? ipse qui generauit, aequalis est illis omnibus aut maior est illis ? FEL dixit: Et qui generauit et quos generauit et ubi positi sunt, omnia aequalia sunt. AUG. dixit: Unius ergo substantiae sunt? FEL. dixit: Unius. AUG. dixit: Hoc quod est deus pater, hoc sunt filii ipsius, hoc et terra illa? FEL dixit: Hoc unum sunt omnes. AUG. dixit: Huius ergo terrae non est pater, sed habitator ? FEL. dixit: Etiam. AUG. dixit: Si nec genuit illam nec fecit illam, quomodo ad eum pertineat nisi sola uicinitate, non uideo, quomodo si habeat aliquis uicinum bonum;
萬物彼此相等,無論是他所生的,還是他未生的,即他所居住那地。奧古斯丁說:怎麼?那生育者本身,是與那一切相等,還是大於它們?斐利斯說:那生育者、他所生的、以及它們所安置之處——全都相等。奧古斯丁說:那麼它們是同一本質嗎?斐利斯說:同一本質。奧古斯丁說:神父是什麼,他的眾子便是什麼,那地也是什麼嗎?斐利斯說:這一切都是同一。奧古斯丁說:那麼他不是這地的父,而是居住者嗎?斐利斯說:正是。奧古斯丁說:他若既沒有生它、也沒有造它,那麼它除藉單純的毗鄰之外如何與他有關,我便看不出——就如有人有一位善鄰;
All things are equated to one another, both those he begot and those he did not beget, that is, that earth where he dwelt. AUGUSTINE said: What? Is he himself who begot equal to all those things, or greater than they? FELIX said: Both he who begot and those whom he begot and where they are placed — all are equal. AUGUSTINE said: They are then of one substance? FELIX said: Of one. AUGUSTINE said: What God the Father is, this his sons are, this that earth also is? FELIX said: These are all one. AUGUSTINE said: Of this earth then he is not the father, but the inhabitant? FELIX said: Even so. AUGUSTINE said: If he neither begot it nor made it, how it pertains to him except by mere neighbourhood I do not see — as if one has a good neighbour;
22:59
et duae iam erunt res ambae ingenitae: terra et pater. .FEL. dixit: Immo tres sunt: pater ingenitus, terra ingenita et aer ingenitus.\'. AUG. dixit: Hoc totum una substantia est? FEL. dixit: Una. AUG. dixit: Et ita fundata, ut a nullo umquam moueri aut concuti possit? FEL. dixit: Motio et concussio habet distantiam. AUG. dixit: Habeat; sed tamen talia fuerunt, ut a nullo umquam moueri aut concuti possent ? FEL. dixit: Est distantia inter moueri et concuti. AUG. dixit: Non inde te interrogo. FEL. dixit: Sed inde me uis tenere. AUG. dixit: Quomodo uis, accipe "moueri* non poterat moueri ? FEL dixit: Non dico, quia non poterat moueri, sed motio distantia est. AUG. dixit: Sed ita dixi:
那麼便有兩樣都是非受生的:地和父。斐利斯說:不,反倒有三樣:非受生的父、非受生的地、非受生的氣。奧古斯丁說:這全體是同一本質嗎?斐利斯說:同一。奧古斯丁說:且如此奠定,以致無人任何時候能使它移動或動搖?斐利斯說:移動與動搖有差別。奧古斯丁說:就算有差別;但它們是否終究是這樣,以致無人任何時候能使它們移動或動搖?斐利斯說:被移動與被動搖之間有差別。奧古斯丁說:我不是在問你那個。斐利斯說:但你正是要從那方面來抓住我。奧古斯丁說:你隨你所願理解——「它不能被移動」;它能被移動嗎?斐利斯說:我並不是說它不能被移動,而是說移動乃是一種差別。奧古斯丁說:但我是這樣說的:
and there will then be two things both unbegotten: the earth and the father. FELIX said: Nay rather, there are three: the unbegotten father, the unbegotten earth, and the unbegotten air. AUGUSTINE said: Is this whole one substance? FELIX said: One. AUGUSTINE said: And so founded that it can never be moved or shaken by anyone? FELIX said: Motion and shaking have a difference. AUGUSTINE said: Let them have it; but nevertheless were they such that they could never be moved or shaken by anyone? FELIX said: There is a difference between being moved and being shaken. AUGUSTINE said: I do not ask you about that. FELIX said: But it is from that side that you wish to hold me. AUGUSTINE said: Take it however you wish — "it could not be moved"; could it be moved? FELIX said: I do not say that it could not be moved, but motion is a difference. AUGUSTINE said: But I said thus:
22:60
nec moueri nec concuti; non dixi: moueri quidem potest, sed concuti non potest, aut: concuti quidem potest, sed moueri non potest. sed ambas res dixi: non posse nec moueri nec concuti. FEL. dixit: De ambabus rebus distantia est inter moueri et concuti. AU6. dixit: Legamus ergo sequentia, uideamus, si deus iste, qui fundata habebat regna super lucidam et beatam terram, quae a nullo umquam moueri et concuti possunt, neminem timuit, sicut oportebat, ut neminem timeret, cuius regna sic fundata erant, ut a nullo aut moueri aut concuti possent. et legit sequentia: iuxta uero unam partem ac latus inlustris illius ac sanctae terrae. et cum legeret, interrogauit: quod latus? dextrum aut sinistrum?
既不被移動也不被動搖;我並沒有說:它固然能被移動,卻不能被動搖,或:它固然能被動搖,卻不能被移動。而我是說這兩樣:它們既不能被移動也不能被動搖。斐利斯說:關於這兩樣,被移動與被動搖之間有差別。奧古斯丁說:那麼讓我們讀下文;讓我們看那位神——就是把他的諸國度奠基於光明而蒙福之地、無人任何時候能使之移動或動搖的——是否如所當然的那樣不懼怕任何人,以致他既然國度如此奠定、無人能使之移動或動搖,就不懼怕任何人。他便誦讀下文:「而在那輝煌神聖之地的一部分與一側旁邊。」當他讀時,便問:哪一側?右邊還是左邊?
neither moved nor shaken; I did not say: it can indeed be moved, but cannot be shaken, or: it can indeed be shaken, but cannot be moved. But I spoke of both things: that they can neither be moved nor shaken. FELIX said: Concerning both things there is a difference between being moved and being shaken. AUGUSTINE said: Let us then read what follows; let us see whether that god, who had his realms founded upon the shining and blessed earth, which can never be moved or shaken by anyone, feared no one, as befitted, so that he feared no one whose realms were so founded that they could be neither moved nor shaken by anyone. And he read what followed: "But beside one part and side of that illustrious and holy earth." And when he read it, he asked: What side? The right or the left?
22:61
FEL. dixit: Hanc tibi ego non possum interpretari scripturam et exponere, quod ibi non est; ipsa sibi interpres est. ego non possum dicere, ne forte incurram in peccatum. AUG. dixit: Legatur ergo, quod sequitur. et cum legeret et uentum esset ad locum,. ubi habet: lucis uero beatissimae pater sciens labem magnam ac uastitatem, quae ex tenebris surgeret, aduersus sua sancta inpendere saecula, nisi quod eximium ac praeclarum et uirtute potens numen obponat, quo superet simul ac destruat stirpem tenebrarum, qua extincta perpetua quies lucis incolis pararetur, Augustinus dixit:
斐利斯說:這段聖經我不能為你闡釋、解說那並不在其中的東西;它是它自己的解釋者。我不能說,免得或許陷入罪中。奧古斯丁說:那麼讓下文被誦讀。當他讀到那有著這話的地方:「但那至福之光的父,知道從黑暗中將興起、且懸在他神聖世代之上的大傾覆與荒毀,除非他擺出某位卓越、輝煌、大有能力的神明來抵擋它,藉此他得以同時制勝並毀滅黑暗的族類,這族類一旦被撲滅,光明的居民便可得永遠的安息,」奧古斯丁說:
FELIX said: This Scripture I cannot interpret and expound to you, for what is not there; it is its own interpreter. I cannot say, lest perhaps I fall into sin. AUGUSTINE said: Then let what follows be read. And when he read it and had come to the place where it has: "But the father of the most blessed light, knowing the great ruin and devastation which would rise up from the darkness and was hanging over his holy realms, unless he should set against it some excellent and illustrious deity, mighty in power, whereby he might at once overcome and destroy the stock of the darkness, which being extinguished, perpetual rest might be prepared for the inhabitants of the light," Augustine said:
22:62
Nunc iam quia coeperunt apertae blasphemiae, si defendendas putas, dic, quid ista gens tenebrarum, quam uidetur deus timuisse, ne magna labes et uastitas ex tenebris in regna eius inruerent, nocere poterat deo; maxime cuius regna superius dixit ita fundata, ut a nullo umquam moueri aut concuti possent. quid ergo illi factura erat gens ista? poterat ei nocere, an non poterat? responde unum de duobus. FEL. dixit: Et ego respondeo: si nihil contra deum est, secundum quod dixit scriptura Manichaei, quia est alterum regnum, pro qua causa Christus missus est, ut nos liberaret de laqueo mortis huius? cuius est iste laqueus et mors? si aduersarius nullus contra deum est, ut quid baptizati sumus ?
那麼現在,既然公開的褻瀆已經開始,你若認為它們應當被辯護,就請說:這黑暗的族類——就是神彷彿曾懼怕、唯恐從黑暗來的大傾覆與荒毀衝入他國度的——能對神造成什麼傷害;尤其他先前說他的國度如此奠定,以致無人任何時候能使之移動或動搖。那麼這族類要對他做什麼?它能傷害他,還是不能?請就二者取其一回答。斐利斯說:我也回答:若照摩尼的經文所說——有另一個國度——並無任何敵對神的,那麼基督為何緣故被差來,好救我們脫離這死亡的網羅?這網羅和死亡是誰的?若沒有任何敵對神的仇敵,那麼我們為何受了洗?
Now then, since open blasphemies have begun, if you think they should be defended, say what this race of darkness — which God seems to have feared, lest a great ruin and devastation from the darkness should burst into his realms — could do to harm God; especially since he said above that his realms were so founded that they could never be moved or shaken by anyone. What then was this race going to do to him? Could it harm him, or could it not? Answer one of the two. FELIX said: And I answer: if there is nothing against God, according to what the Scripture of Manichaeus said — that there is another kingdom — for what cause was Christ sent, to free us from the snare of this death? Whose is this snare and death? If there is no adversary against God, why have we been baptized?
22:63
ut quid eucharistia, ut quid christianitas, si contra deum nihil est? AUG. dixit: Quia uideo te nolle respondere, quod te interrogo, et te interrogare, ut tibi respondeam, et hoc non recuso, dum tamen memineris, quia tibi interroganti ego respondeo, tu autem mihi interroganti respondere noluisti. sed quia me interrogasti, audi, quod interrogasti. nos quidem dicimus liberatorem Christum uenisse et a peccatis nostris dicimus nos liberari, quia nos non sumus de substantia dei geniti, sed per eius uerbum facti a deo. multum autem interest inter natum de substantia dei et factum a deo, quod non est de substantia dei. quicquid ergo fecit deus, potest esse mutabile;
若沒有任何敵對神的,那麼為何有聖體,為何有基督信仰?奧古斯丁說:既然我看見你不願回答我所問的,卻反問我好使我回答你——而這我並不拒絕,只要你記得:你發問時我回答你,而我發問時你卻拒絕回答我——但既然你問了我,就請聽你所問的。我們確實說,基督救主已經來到,且我們說我們得脫離自己的罪,因為我們並非從神的本質所生,而是神藉他的道所造。從神的本質所生的,與被神所造而非出於神本質的,兩者之間有極大的差別。所以凡神所造的都可以是可變的;
Why the Eucharist, why Christianity, if there is nothing against God? AUGUSTINE said: Since I see that you are unwilling to answer what I ask you, and that you question me so that I may answer you — and this I do not refuse, provided you remember that I answer you when you question, whereas you have refused to answer me when I question — but since you have questioned me, hear what you have asked. We indeed say that Christ the Liberator has come, and we say that we are freed from our sins, because we are not begotten of the substance of God, but made by God through his Word. Now there is a great difference between what is born of the substance of God and what is made by God, which is not of the substance of God. Whatever therefore God has made can be mutable;
22:64
ipse autem deus non est mutabilis, quia non possunt aequari opera artifici et conditori. tu autem, qui paulo ante ad interrogationem meam dixisti, quia et pater, qui generauit ibi lucis filios, et aer et ipsa terra et ipsi filii una substantia sunt et aequalia sunt omnia, oportet, ut dicas mihi, huic substantiae utique incorruptibili quomodo poterat nocere gens tenebrarum. si enim poterat nocere ei, non erat natura incorruptibilis; si autem non poterat, nulla causa erat, quare proelium agitaret et illud numen, quod dicit, huc mitteret. FEL. dixit: Dilationem peto, ut possim respondere. AUG. dixit: Quando? cras intermissus sufficit? FEL. dixit:
但神自己卻不是可變的,因為作品不能與工匠、創造者相等。但你——你方才回答我的問題時說,那位在那裡生了光明之子的父、氣、地本身、以及那些子本身,都是同一本質、且全都相等——你就當告訴我,黑暗的族類如何能傷害這確乎不朽壞的本質。因為它若能傷害它,那便不是不朽壞的本性;但它若不能,那麼並無緣由使它發動戰爭、並差遣他所說的那位神明到這裡來。斐利斯說:我請求延期,好使我能回答。奧古斯丁說:何時?明天的間隔夠嗎?斐利斯說:
but God himself is not mutable, because the works cannot be equal to the craftsman and founder. But you, who a little before said in answer to my question that both the father, who begot the sons of the light there, and the air and the earth itself and the sons themselves are of one substance and all are equal — it behoves you to tell me how the race of darkness could harm this substance, which is surely incorruptible. For if it could harm it, it was not an incorruptible nature; but if it could not, there was no cause why it should wage battle and send hither that deity of which he speaks. FELIX said: I ask for a postponement, that I may be able to answer. AUGUSTINE said: When? Is tomorrow's interval enough? FELIX said:
22:65
Intermitte mihi tres dies, id est hodie et cras et perindie aut usque ad diem, qui est post dominicum, id est pridie idus Decembris. AUG. dixit : Uideo te dilationem ad respondendum petisse; humanum est, ut concedatur tibi . sed si respondere non potueris ad praestitutum diem, quid fiet? FEL. dixit: Ero uictus. AUG. dixit: Quid? si fugeris. FEL. dixit: Reus ero ciuitatis huius et ubique et legis meae. AUG. dixit: Immo hoc dic: si fugero, sic habear, tamquam si anathemauero Manichaeum. FEL. dixit: Hoc dicere non possum. AUG. dixit: Ergo aperte nobis dic, quia fugere cogitas et nemo te tenet. FEL. dixit: Non fugio. AUG. dixit: Ut uideo, non uis quasi uictus abscedere; sed saltem hoc dic:
請准我三天,即今日、明日和後日,或直到主日之後那日,即十二月望日的前一日。奧古斯丁說:我看見你為了回答而請求延期;准你所求乃是人之常情。但你若不能在所定的日子回答,該當如何?斐利斯說:我便算敗了。奧古斯丁說:你若逃走呢?斐利斯說:我便對這城、對各處、對我的教法都有罪。奧古斯丁說:不如你這樣說:我若逃走,就當把我看作彷彿咒詛了摩尼一般。斐利斯說:這話我不能說。奧古斯丁說:那麼請向我們公開說出,你正打算逃走,而無人攔你。斐利斯說:我不逃走。奧古斯丁說:依我看,你不願如敗者般離去;但至少請說這話:
Grant me three days, that is, today and tomorrow and the day after, or until the day which is after the Lord's Day, that is, the day before the Ides of December. AUGUSTINE said: I see you have asked for a postponement in order to answer; it is human that it be granted to you. But if you cannot answer by the appointed day, what shall be done? FELIX said: I shall be vanquished. AUGUSTINE said: What if you flee? FELIX said: I shall be guilty toward this city and everywhere and toward my law. AUGUSTINE said: Nay rather, say this: if I flee, let me be regarded as though I had anathematized Manichaeus. FELIX said: This I cannot say. AUGUSTINE said: Then say to us openly that you are thinking of fleeing and no one holds you. FELIX said: I do not flee. AUGUSTINE said: As I see, you do not wish to depart as though vanquished; but at least say this:
22:66
si fugero. uictus sum. FEL. dixit: Dixi. AUG. dixit: Et unde adparebit te fugisse propter gesta? FEL. dixit: lube, ut quem elegero, cum ipso sim. AUG. dixit: Elige tibi aliquem de praesentibus istis fratribus, qui ad cancellum stant. ,FEL. dixit: Sed cum illo, qui est in medio. AUG. dixit: Sicut tibi elegisti, usque ad diem cam illo eris. FEL. dixit: Etiam; et ego hoc consentio. BONIFACIUS dixit: Praestabit Christus, ut si cum illo ueniam, christianus est. Augustinus episcopus ecclesiae catholicae Hipponeregiensium his in ecclesia coram populo gestis subscripsi. Felix christianus, cultor legis Manichaei, his in ecclesia coram populo gestis subscripsi. LIBER SECUNDUS.
我若逃走,便算敗了。斐利斯說:我說了。奧古斯丁說:那麼從何看出你是因這訴訟記錄而逃走的?斐利斯說:請下令使我可以與我所選的人同在。奧古斯丁說:請從站在欄杆旁在場的這些弟兄中,為你自己選一人。斐利斯說:但要與那位在中間的。奧古斯丁說:正如你為自己所選的,你要與他同在直到那日。斐利斯說:正是;我對此同意。波尼法修說:基督必成全這事,就是若我與他同來,他便是基督徒。我,奧古斯丁,希波雷吉烏斯大公教會的主教,在教會中於眾民面前,於這些所行的記錄上署名。我,斐利斯,一個基督徒,摩尼教法的信奉者,在教會中於眾民面前,於這些所行的記錄上署名。第二卷。
if I flee, I am vanquished. FELIX said: I have said it. AUGUSTINE said: And whence will it appear that you fled on account of the proceedings? FELIX said: Command that I may be with whomever I shall choose. AUGUSTINE said: Choose for yourself someone from these brethren here present who stand at the railing. FELIX said: But with him who is in the middle. AUGUSTINE said: As you have chosen for yourself, you shall be with him until the day. FELIX said: Even so; and I consent to this. BONIFACE said: Christ will grant that, if I come with him, he is a Christian. I, Augustine, bishop of the Catholic Church of Hippo Regius, have subscribed to these proceedings enacted in the church before the people. I, Felix, a Christian, a worshipper of the law of Manichaeus, have subscribed to these proceedings enacted in the church before the people. BOOK TWO.
22:67
Cum uentum esset ad diem praestitutum, id est ad pridie iduum Decembrium, res sic agi coepit in ecclesia Pacis. AUGUSTINUS episcopus ecclesiae catholicae Hipponiregiensium regionum dixit: Pridem cum sermonem haberemus, di-. lationem te petiisse meministi, cum ad ea, quae interrogaueram in praesenti respondere non posses. si ergo tam lato temporis spatio, post diem scilicet quintum, aliquid excogitasti, responde. hoc enim tunc interrogaueram: si deo nocere nihil poterat, quare bellum gessit cum gente quam dicitis tenebrarum, in quo bello naturae daemonum misceret substantiam suam, quae hoc est, quod ipse, sicut iam interrogatus dixisti?
到了所定的日子,即十二月望日的前一日,此事便在平安堂中如此進行。奧古斯丁,希波雷吉烏斯諸地區大公教會的主教,說:我們前些時候進行討論時,你記得你請求延期,因為你當時不能回答我所問的。那麼你若在這麼寬裕的時間內——即第五日之後——想出了什麼,就請回答。因為我當時所問的乃是:若沒有什麼能傷害神,他為何要與你們所稱為黑暗的族類爭戰,在那場戰爭中把他自己的本質——即他自己所是的那本質——與眾魔的本性相混,正如你受問時所說的?
When the appointed day had come, that is, the day before the Ides of December, the matter began to be conducted thus in the Church of Peace. AUGUSTINE, bishop of the Catholic Church of the regions of Hippo Regius, said: When we held our discussion a while ago, you remember that you asked for a postponement, since you could not answer at the moment the things I had asked. If then, in so wide a span of time, namely after the fifth day, you have thought out anything, answer. For this is what I asked then: if nothing could harm God, why did he wage war with the race which you call the race of darkness, in which war he mingled his own substance — which is that which he himself is — with the nature of the demons, as you said when questioned?
22:68
si autem nocere ei poterat, non incorruptibilem deum colitis, qualem ueritas et apostolica doctrina testatur. FELIX dixit: Ei quo a sanctitate tua recessi, ut ad diem constitutum reuersus essem, ut responderem tuae interrogationi, quaecumque uelles interrogare, uentum est ad diem . et quia nullam scripturam inter manus habui, quia non mihi sunt redditae, unde me instruere possemnullus enim ad certamen exit, nisi prius meditatus fuerit et nullus litigator potest sine suis chartis litigaresimiliter et ego sine mea scriptura respondere non possum. AUG. dixit:
但若有什麼能傷害他,你們所敬拜的便不是不朽壞的神,就是真理和使徒教義所證實的那位。斐利斯說:自從我離開你的聖德,好在所定的日子回來、回答你所要問的一切,如今那日已到。但因為我手中沒有任何聖經,既然它們尚未歸還於我,我無從據以裝備自己——因為無人赴戰,除非先經思量;也無訟者能無其文卷而爭訟——照樣我也不能無我的聖經而回答。奧古斯丁說:
But if anything could harm him, you do not worship an incorruptible God, such as truth and apostolic doctrine attest. FELIX said: From the time I departed from your Holiness, that I might return on the appointed day to answer your questioning, whatever you should wish to ask, the day has come. And because I have had no Scripture in my hands, since they have not been restored to me, whence I might instruct myself — for no one goes forth to a contest unless he has first meditated, and no litigant can litigate without his documents — likewise I too cannot answer without my Scripture. AUGUSTINE said:
22:69
Istam tergiuersationem tanto dierum spatio cogitasti, quae te in causa perdita et errore sacrilego quid respondeas non habentem adiuuare nihil poterit. notum est enim omnibus, qui aderant, quos etiam nunc adesse uideo, te dierum tantum dilationem petisse, debuisse autem petere etiam codices, quando dilationem petisti, si his te putabas instrui posse ad respondendum; quod non fecisti. noui te petisse codices non quidem ad instructionem inspiciendos, uerum hoc longe, antequam peteres dilationem; cum uero dilationem petisti, codicum tibi reddendorum et inspiciendorum, ut esse posses instructior, nullam fecisti mentionem. FEL. dixit:
你在這麼多天的漫長時間裡想出的這個推諉之計,卻絲毫不能幫助你,因為在一件敗訴的官司和褻瀆的謬誤中,你無話可答。因為在場眾人——就是我如今看見在場的——都知道,你只請求了延期日子,但你既請求延期,若你以為能藉那些抄本裝備自己來回答,你本也當請求那些抄本——這你卻沒有做。我知道你曾請求那些抄本,卻並非為查閱以裝備自己,而且那遠在你請求延期之前;然而當你請求延期時,你卻絲毫沒有提到要把抄本歸還給你、供你查閱,好使你更充分地裝備。斐利斯說:
This evasion you have devised in so long a span of days, but it will be able to help you not at all, since in a lost cause and a sacrilegious error you have nothing to answer. For it is known to all who were present, whom I see present even now, that you asked only for a postponement of days, but that you ought also to have asked for the codices when you asked for the postponement, if you thought you could be instructed by them to answer — which you did not do. I know that you asked for the codices, not indeed to be inspected for instruction, but this was far before you asked for the postponement; when, however, you asked for the postponement, you made no mention of the codices being restored to you and inspected, that you might be better instructed. FELIX said:
22:70
Modo peto, codices reddantur mihi, et uenio ad certamen post biduum; et si uictus fuero, quod deliberaueris, subeo. AUG. dixit: Rudem te in ista scelerata secta non esse puto, quod et fateris. non te autem habere, quod respondeas, etsi tu non fatearis, omnis homo iam uidet. sed quia codices tuos. repetis, qui sub sigillo publico custodiuntur, quibus inspectis dicis te instructum uenire posse post biduum, illud, quod iam constat, obiectis quaestionibus te respondere non potuisse recole. Tolle autem codices tuos, et dic, quid inde uelis tibi proferri, quod modo inspicias et respondeas. FEL. dixit: Omnes scripturas, quae mihi sublatae sunt.
如今我請求把那些抄本歸還於我,我便在兩天後前來應戰;我若敗了,便甘受你所裁定的一切。奧古斯丁說:我不認為你在這邪惡的教派中是生手,這你也承認。但你無話可答,縱使你不承認,人人都已看見。然而既然你討回你的抄本——就是保存在公家封印之下的——並說查閱後你能在兩天後有備而來,那麼請記住如今已確立的事,即你未能回答向你提出的問題。但你取回你的抄本,且說出你要從其中拿出什麼,好使你如今查閱並回答。斐利斯說:一切從我這裡被取走的聖經。
Now I ask that the codices be restored to me, and I will come to the contest after two days; and if I am vanquished, I shall undergo whatever you shall have decided. AUGUSTINE said: I do not think you a novice in this wicked sect, which you also confess. But that you have nothing to answer, even if you do not confess it, every man already sees. But since you demand back your codices, which are kept under the public seal, and say that, having inspected them, you can come instructed after two days, recall this, which is now established, that you were not able to answer the questions put to you. But take your codices, and say what you wish to be produced from them, that you may now inspect and answer. FELIX said: All the Scriptures which have been taken from me.
22:71
ista enim epistula Fundamenti est, quod et sanctitas tua bene scit, quod et ego dixi, quia ipsa continet initium, medium et finem. ipsa legatur, et quicquid malum obicitur legi meae, probetur . et nego illam, si probata fuerint illa crimina, quae obiciuntur legi meae. AUG. dixit: Quoniam fateris hanc esse epistulam, ubi doctrinae uestrae initium, medium et finis continetur, hoc initium quam sit sacrilegum, ubi deum dicitis pugnasse contra gentem tenebrarum et miscuisse naturae daemonum polluendam et ligandam partem suam, quae hoc est quod ipse, tam sacrilegum est, ut ferri ab audientibus uix possit.
因為這正是《根基書信》,正如你的聖德所深知,也如我所說的,因為它本身包含了開頭、中間和結尾。讓它被誦讀,讓凡指控我教法之惡的都得證實;那些指控我教法的罪名若得證實,我便棄絕它。奧古斯丁說:既然你承認這正是那封含有你們教義開頭、中間、結尾的信,那麼這開頭何等褻瀆——在其中你們說神與黑暗的族類爭戰,並把他自己的一部分——即他自己所是的那部分——與眾魔的本性相混,以致被玷污、被捆綁——如此褻瀆,以致聆聽者幾乎無法忍受。
For this is the Letter of the Foundation, as your Holiness well knows, and as I too have said, since it itself contains the beginning, the middle, and the end. Let it be read, and let whatever evil is charged against my law be proved; and I renounce it, if those crimes which are charged against my law shall have been proved. AUGUSTINE said: Since you confess this to be the letter wherein the beginning, middle, and end of your doctrine is contained, how sacrilegious this beginning is — where you say that God fought against the race of darkness and mingled his own part, which is that which he himself is, with the nature of the demons, to be polluted and bound — is so sacrilegious that it can scarcely be borne by those who hear it.
22:72
hoc obicitur primo sectae uestraesiue initium hoc uoces, siue medium, siue finem, non ualde id curo; hoc tamen de hac epistula, quam fateris esse Manichaei, lectum esse non negashoc uobis obicitur, hoc defende, si potes, ut ad alia ueniamus. unde iterum interrogo: si deum incorruptibilem colitis, quid ei nocere poterat nescio quae gens aduersa, quam fingitis ? si nihil ei nocere poterat, nulla fuit causa, quare partem suam naturae daemonum commisceret; si autem nocere ei poterat,. non deum incorruptibilem colitis. FEL. dixit: Manichaeus dicit duas esse naturas et modo inde culpatur, quia dixit duas esse, bonam et malam. Christus in euangelio duas dicit esse arbores:
這首先被指控加於你們教派——無論你稱這為開頭、還是中間、還是結尾,我並不甚在意;然而你不否認這是從這封信中讀出的,就是你承認為摩尼所寫的——這是指控你們的;你若能,就辯護這一點,好使我們能進到其他事上。因此我再問:你們若敬拜一位不朽壞的神,那麼你所想像的某個敵對族類能傷害他什麼?它若絲毫不能傷害他,那麼並無緣由使他把自己的一部分與眾魔的本性相混;但它若能傷害他,你們所敬拜的便不是不朽壞的神。斐利斯說:摩尼說有兩種本性,如今他就為此受責,因為他說有兩種,一善一惡。基督在福音中說有兩棵樹:
This is charged first against your sect — whether you call this the beginning, or the middle, or the end, I do not much care; yet you do not deny that this was read from this letter, which you confess to be Manichaeus's — this is charged against you; defend this, if you can, that we may come to other matters. Whence I ask again: if you worship an incorruptible God, what could some hostile race, which you imagine, harm him? If it could harm him nothing, there was no cause why he should mingle his own part with the nature of the demons; but if it could harm him, you do not worship an incorruptible God. FELIX said: Manichaeus says there are two natures, and now for that he is blamed, because he said there are two, a good and an evil. Christ in the Gospel says there are two trees:
22:73
arbor bona numquam facit fructum malum, et arbor mala numquam facit fructum bonum. ecce duas naturas. deinde in euangelio scriptum est: nonne bonum semen seminasti in agro? unde adparuerunt zizania? hoc inimicus fecit. iste\' inimicus si non est extraneus a deo, probetur mihi; si ad deum pertinet inimicus iste, quale semen seminauit? item in euangelio scriptum est Christo dicente, quia in nouissimis temporibus thronum in medio saeculo ponet et mittet angelos suos in orientem et occidentem, septentrionem et meridianum et congregabit omnes gentes ante se et separabit illos, sicut pastor separat agnos ab haedis. et ut compendiue dicam, agnis dicet:
好樹絕不結壞果子,壞樹絕不結好果子。看哪,兩種本性。然後福音中記著:「你豈不是在田裡撒了好種子嗎?那麼稗子從何而來?這是仇敵做的。」這仇敵若不是與神無關的外來者,請向我證明;這仇敵若與神有關,他撒了何等的種子?福音中又記著,基督說在末後的時候他要在世界中間設立寶座,差遣他的使者往東西南北,把萬民聚集在他面前,將他們分別出來,如牧人分別綿羊與山羊。簡言之,他要對綿羊說:
a good tree never makes bad fruit, and a bad tree never makes good fruit. Behold two natures. Then in the Gospel it is written: "Did you not sow good seed in the field? Whence then have the tares appeared? This the enemy has done." This enemy, if he is not foreign to God, let it be proved to me; if this enemy pertains to God, what kind of seed did he sow? Again in the Gospel it is written, Christ saying that in the last times he will set his throne in the midst of the world and will send his angels into the east and the west, the north and the south, and will gather all nations before him and will separate them, as a shepherd separates the lambs from the kids. And, to speak briefly, to the lambs he will say:
22:74
ite in regnum, quod uobis paratum est ab origine mundi. haedis dicet, qui in sinistra parte sunt: recedite a me, qui operati estis iniquitatem; nomen enim meum habuistis, sed opera non fecistis; ite in ignem aeternum, qui paratus est diabolo et angelis eius. qui sunt, qui nomen Christi habent et mittuntur in ignem aeternum cum diabolo et angelis eius, et ad quam partem pertinent isti, quibus Christus non permiscetur, et nomen eius portant? hoc enim Manichaeus dicit, quia quos Christus damnat, ipsius non sunt. nam Paulus apostolus dicit: prudentia carnis inimica est deo; legi enim dei non est subiecta nec enim potest. hoc Manichaeus dicit, quia quae inimica est deo, ad deum non pertinet;
你們進入那從世界之始為你們所預備的國。他要對在左邊的山羊說:離開我,你們這作了不義的人;因為你們曾有我的名,卻沒有行那工作;進入那為魔鬼和他的使者所預備的永火。那些有基督之名、卻與魔鬼和他的使者一同被送入永火的是誰,這些基督不與之相混、卻擔負他名的人屬於哪一部分?因為摩尼如此說,凡基督所定罪的都不屬於他。因為使徒保羅說:屬肉體的智慧是與神為仇的;因為它不服神的律法,也是不能服的。摩尼如此說,凡與神為仇的都不屬於神;
Go into the kingdom which was prepared for you from the origin of the world. To the kids, who are on the left side, he will say: Depart from me, you who have worked iniquity; for you had my name, but you did not do the works; go into the eternal fire, which is prepared for the devil and his angels. Who are they who have the name of Christ and are sent into eternal fire with the devil and his angels, and to what part do these belong, with whom Christ is not mingled, and yet they bear his name? For this Manichaeus says, that those whom Christ condemns are not his. For Paul the Apostle says: the prudence of the flesh is an enemy to God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can it be. This Manichaeus says, that what is an enemy to God does not pertain to God;
22:75
si autem ad deum pertinet, ipse sibi inimicum fecit; hoc Manichaeus non dicit. iterum Paulus dicit: deus saeculi huius excaecauit mentes infidelium ad non contemplandam claritatem euangelii Christi, qui est imago dei. ipse Paulus iterum dicit: datus est mihi stimulus carnis meae, angelus satanae. qui me colaphizat die ac nocte; propter quod dominum rogaui, ut discederet a me . et dixit mihi: sufficit tibi gratia mea; nam uirtus in infirmitate probatur. ecce quid apostolus dixit, ecce quid euangelista.
但它若屬於神,那麼他便為自己造了一個仇敵;這摩尼並不這樣說。保羅又說:這世界的神弄瞎了不信之人的心眼,叫他們不能看見基督榮耀福音的光輝,基督本是神的像。保羅自己又說:有一根我肉體上的刺賜給我,就是撒但的使者,日夜攻擊我;為此我三次求主叫它離開我。主對我說:我的恩典夠你用的;因為德能在軟弱上顯得完全。看哪,這是使徒所說的,看哪,這是福音書作者所說的。
but if it pertains to God, he has made an enemy for himself; this Manichaeus does not say. Again Paul says: the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, that they should not contemplate the brightness of the Gospel of Christ, who is the image of God. Paul himself again says: there was given to me a goad of my flesh, an angel of Satan, who buffets me day and night; wherefore I besought the Lord that it might depart from me. And he said to me: my grace is sufficient for you; for virtue is proved in weakness. Behold what the Apostle has said, behold what the Evangelist has said.
22:76
cum Manichaeus hoc adserat, quia est extraneus a deo, qui contra deum bellauitsiue quia Christus crucifixus est, siue quia apostoli omnes propter dei mandatumiste, qui eos crucifixit, cui mandatum dei non placet, hoc mihi dicat sanctitas tua, si ad deum pertinet. AUG. dixit: Scripturas sanctas. quas non intellegendo longe a ueritate aberratis, commemorare uoluisti, uelut ex eis patrocinium adhibens uaniloquiis uestris.
既然摩尼如此斷言,就是那與神爭戰的乃與神無關的外來者——無論因為基督被釘十字架,還是因為眾使徒都為神的命令被殺——那麼那位釘他們十字架的、就是神的命令不使之喜悅的,願你的聖德告訴我這事,他是否屬於神。奧古斯丁說:你想要引用聖經,就是你因不明白它們而遠離真理的,彷彿從其中為你的空談取得庇護。
Since Manichaeus asserts this, that he is foreign to God who warred against God — whether because Christ was crucified, or because all the apostles were slain for the sake of God's command — this one who crucified them, whom the command of God does not please, let your Holiness tell me this, whether he pertains to God. AUGUSTINE said: You have wished to cite the holy Scriptures, from which, by not understanding them, you stray far from the truth, as though drawing from them a patronage for your idle talk.
22:77
inter omnia tamen, quae partim sicut uere scripta sunt, partim aliter quam scripta sunt commemorasti, nusquam ostendere potuisti, quia deus regnis suis hostilem naturam inminentem repellere uolens, ut habeat quietem, partem suam, quae hoc est quod ipse, naturae contrariae daemonum miscens, colligari ab eis et contaminari fecerit. hoc autem est, quod uobis obicitur. unde quid respondeas non inueniendo commemorasti diuinarum scripturarum capitula, ubi de peccatoribus dictum est, quia non pertinent ad beatam uitam, quam bonis et fidelibus donat deus, et has uelut duas naturas accipi uoluisti secundum deliramenta Manichaei.
然而在你所引用的一切之中——部分照它們真實所記,部分則與所記不同——你竟無處能證明神為要擊退威脅他國度的敵對本性、使自己得安息,便把他自己的一部分——即他自己所是的那部分——與眾魔相反的本性相混,並使它被它們捆綁、被玷污。但這正是指控你們的。因此,你找不到可答的話,便引用了神聖經卷的章節,就是那論到罪人的地方,說他們不屬於神所賜給善人和信徒的蒙福生命,而你竟想照摩尼的胡言,把這些當作兩種本性來理解。
Yet among all the things which you have cited — partly as they are truly written, partly otherwise than they are written — you have nowhere been able to show that God, wishing to repel a hostile nature threatening his realms, that he might have rest, mingled his own part, which is that which he himself is, with the contrary nature of the demons, and caused it to be bound by them and contaminated. But this is what is charged against you. Whence, not finding what to answer, you have cited chapters of the divine Scriptures, where it is said of sinners that they do not pertain to the blessed life which God grants to the good and faithful, and you have wished these to be taken as two natures, according to the ravings of Manichaeus.
22:78
ueritas autem dicit omnia ista, quae uidemus et quae non uidemus, quae naturaliter subsistunt, a deo facta esse; in quibus rationalem creaturam etiam ipsam factam siue m angelis siue in hominibus accepisse liberum arbitrium: quo libero arbitrio si deo seruire uellet, secundum uoluntatem ac legem dei haberet apud eum aeternam felicitatem; si autem legi eius subdi noluisset, sed potestate sua usa contra eius fecisset imperium, secundum eius iustitiam poenae debitae subiaceret. haec omnipotentia dei in creandis omnibus, haec iustitia in remunerandis peccatoribus.
但真理說,我們所見的和我們所不見的、凡本性上存在的一切,都是神所造的;其中理性受造之物,無論在天使還是在人中,都領受了自由意志:憑這自由意志,它若願意事奉神,便照神的旨意和律法在他那裡享有永恆的福樂;但它若不願服他的律法,反倒運用自己的能力違背他的命令,便照他的公義伏在應得的懲罰之下。這便是神在創造萬物上的全能,這便是他在報應罪人上的公義。
But truth says that all those things which we see and which we do not see, which naturally subsist, were made by God; among which the rational creature also, whether in angels or in men, received free will: by which free will, if it should wish to serve God, according to the will and law of God it would have eternal felicity with him; but if it were unwilling to be subject to his law, but, using its own power, had acted against his command, according to his justice it would lie under the punishment due. This is the omnipotence of God in creating all things, this the justice in requiting sinners.
22:79
ecce autem liberum arbitrium, atque inde quemque peccare, si uelit, non peccare, si nolit, non solum in diuinis scripturis, quas non intellegitis, sed etiam in uerbis ipsius Manichaei uestri probo. circumclusus enim uidet potentiam ueritatis, contra quam conatus fuerat aliam naturam, quam non fecit deus, inducere contra deum non solida ueritate, sed inani phantasmate; tamen ad confitendum uerum de libero arbitrio plus in eo ualuit natura humana, in qua eum deus effecit, quam fabula sacrilega, quam sibi ipse confinxit. Audi ergo de libero arbitrio primo ipsum dominum, ubi duas arbores commemorat, quarum mentionem ipse fecisti, audi dicentem:
但看哪,我不僅從你所不明白的神聖經卷中,甚至從你自己的摩尼的話中,證明自由意志,並證明各人若願意便因它犯罪、若不願意便不犯罪。因為他被困住時,看見真理的能力——他曾試圖引進另一種神未曾造的本性來抵擋真理、抵擋神,卻非憑堅實的真理,而是憑空虛的幻象;然而,就承認關於自由意志的真理而言,神在其中造他的人性,在他裡面竟勝過他為自己所編造的褻瀆寓言。那麼請聽關於自由意志,首先是主自己,就是你自己所提及那兩棵樹的地方;請聽他說:
But behold, I prove free will, and that each one sins therefrom if he wills, does not sin if he does not will, not only in the divine Scriptures, which you do not understand, but even in the words of your own Manichaeus. For, hemmed in, he sees the power of truth, against which he had tried to bring in another nature, which God did not make, against God — not by solid truth, but by empty phantasm; yet, to confess the truth about free will, human nature, in which God made him, prevailed in him more than the sacrilegious fable which he himself devised for himself. Hear then about free will, first, the Lord himself, where he mentions the two trees, of which you yourself made mention; hear him saying:
22:80
aut facite arborem bonam et fructum eius bonum aut facite arborem malam et fructum eius malum. cum ergo dicit "aut hoc facite aut illud facite," potestatem indicat. non naturam. nemo enim nisi deus facere arborem potest; sed habet unusquisque in uoluntate aut eligere, quae bona sunt, et esse arbor bona. aut eligere, quae mala sunt, et esse arbor mala, non quia mala ipsa. quae eliguntur, aliquam habent in se ipsis substantiam, sed quia deus omnia, quae condidit. gradibus suis eondidit generibusque distinxit, caelestia atque terrena, inmortalia atque mortalia et omnia bona in suo quodque genere condidit, animam habentem liberum arbitrium sub se ipso et supra cetera collocauit:
或使樹好、其果子也好,或使樹壞、其果子也壞。那麼他既說「或作這、或作那」,便是指明能力,而非本性。因為除神以外無人能造樹;但各人都在自己的意志中,或選擇那善的、作一棵好樹,或選擇那惡的、作一棵壞樹——並非因為那被選擇的惡事本身在自身中有任何本質,而是因為神奠定了他所設立的一切,按其等級奠定它們,並按其種類加以區分,有天上的與地上的、不朽的與必朽的,並按各自的種類把一切善的都奠定為善,且把有自由意志的靈魂安置於他自己之下、萬物之上:
Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad. When therefore he says "either do this or do that," he indicates power, not nature. For no one save God can make a tree; but each one has it in his will either to choose the things which are good and to be a good tree, or to choose the things which are evil and to be an evil tree — not because the evil things themselves which are chosen have any substance in themselves, but because God founded all the things which he established, founded them in their degrees and distinguished them by their kinds, heavenly and earthly, immortal and mortal, and founded all things good each in its own kind, and placed the soul having free will beneath himself and above the rest:
22:81
ut si seruiret superiori, dominaretur inferiori; si autem offenderet superiorem, poenam ex inferiore sentiret. hoc ergo dominus dicens. aut facite illud aut facite illud\' ostendit esse in potestate quid facerent, ipse securus et certus in se tamquam deus, et quia si bonum eligerent, praemium eius acciperent, si malum eligerent, poenam eius sentirent; semper autem ille iustus est aut remunerator aut damnator. Audi ergo iam, quemadmodum Manichaeus ipse tam peruersus, tam superbus, ut aliam introducens naturam ae aequalem deo faceret. deum ad se ipsum deponeret, confessus sit tamen esse liberum arbitrium.
就是它若事奉那較高的,便可管轄那較低的;但它若冒犯那較高的,便要從那較低的感受懲罰。那麼主既說「或作這、或作那」,便顯明他們要做什麼乃在他們的權能之中,而他自己作為神,在自身中安然無憂、確定不移,且若他們選擇善,便必領受他的賞賜,若他們選擇惡,便必感受他的懲罰;但他總是公義的,或作賞賜者,或作定罪者。那麼現在請聽,摩尼自己——如此乖謬、如此驕傲,以致引進另一種本性、使之與神相等,把神貶降到與他自己同等——竟仍承認有自由意志。
that if it should serve the higher, it might rule over the lower; but if it should offend the higher, it would feel punishment from the lower. This then the Lord, in saying "either do this or do that," showed that it was in their power what they should do, he himself being untroubled and certain in himself as God, and that if they chose the good, they would receive his reward, if they chose the evil, they would feel his punishment; but he is always just, either as rewarder or as condemner. Hear then now how Manichaeus himself — so perverse, so proud that, introducing another nature and making it equal to God, he would degrade God down to himself — nevertheless confessed that there is free will.
22:82
in Thesauro uestro, cui tale nomen ad decipiendos homines indidistis, certe sic loquitur, quod et tu ipse cognoscis: hi uero, qui neglegentia sua a labe praedictorum spirituum purgari se minime permiserint mandatisque diuinis ex integro parum obtemperauerint legemque sibi a suo liberatore datam seruare plenius noluerint neque ut decebat sese gubernauerint et cetera. uides in his uerbis confirmatum esse etiam a nesciente quid loqueretur liberum arbitrium. qui enim seruare legem non uult, in potestate est eius, si uelit. non enim dixit: non potuerint sed: noluerint. hoc certe quod nolunt seruare legem, non a gente tenebrarum coguntur; si enim coguntur, non nolunt, sed non possunt;
在你們的《寶藏書》中,就是你們為了欺騙人而給它起了這樣名字的,他確實這樣說,正如你自己所知道的:「但那些因自己的疏忽、絲毫不容自己從前述諸靈的敗壞中被潔淨、且太過不遵行神完整誡命、並拒絕更充分地遵守他們的救主所賜給他們的律法、又不照所當然的治理自己的人,」等等。你看見在這些話中,自由意志甚至被一個不知道自己在說什麼的人所證實。因為那不願遵守律法的人,若他願意,便在他的權能之中去做。因為他並沒有說:他們不能,而是說:他們不願。這一點——就是他們不願遵守律法——他們斷不是被黑暗的族類所強迫的;因為他們若被強迫,便不是不願,而是不能;
In your Treasure, to which you have given such a name to deceive men, he certainly speaks thus, as you yourself know: "But those who by their own negligence have by no means permitted themselves to be purged from the corruption of the aforesaid spirits, and have too little obeyed the divine commandments in their integrity, and have refused to keep more fully the law given to them by their liberator, and have not governed themselves as was fitting," and the rest. You see that in these words free will is confirmed even by one who did not know what he was saying. For he who is unwilling to keep the law, it is in his power to do so, if he will. For he did not say: they could not, but: they were unwilling. This surely, that they are unwilling to keep the law, they are not compelled by the race of darkness; for if they are compelled, they are not unwilling, but they are unable;
22:83
si autem nolunt, non utique coguntur, ut non faciant, sed uoluntate sua nolunt. hoc ergo, quod in eorum uoluntate est, ut nolint, peccatum est certe sine aliqua necessitate gentis tenebrarum; hoc agnosce esse peccatum sine necessitate gentis tenebrarum. et inde uides, unde ueniant omnes culpae, unde merita culparum, unde distributiones poenarum. Habetis etiam hoc in scripturis apocryphis, quas canon quidem catholicus non admittit, uobis autem tanto gratiores sunt, quanto a catholico canone secluduntur. aliquid etiam inde commemorem, cuius ego auctoritate non teneor, sed tu conuinceris. in Actibus conscriptis a Leutio, quos tamquam actus apostolorum scribit, habes ita positum:
但他們若不願,便斷不是被強迫不去做,而是憑自己的意志不願。那麼這一點——就是在他們意志中的不願——確實是罪,並無黑暗族類的任何必然性;請認出這是罪,並無黑暗族類的必然性。從而你便看見一切過失從何而來、過失的應得從何而來、懲罰的分派從何而來。你們在偽經中也有這話,就是大公正典確實不接納、卻因被大公正典所摒除而愈發使你們喜悅的。讓我也從那裡引用一些,其權威並不約束我,卻定你的罪。在琉基烏斯所寫的《行傳》中,就是他冒充作《使徒行傳》所寫的,你們有這樣的記載:
but if they are unwilling, they are surely not compelled not to do it, but by their own will they are unwilling. This then, which is in their will, that they are unwilling, is surely sin without any necessity of the race of darkness; recognize this to be sin without the necessity of the race of darkness. And thence you see whence come all faults, whence the deserts of faults, whence the distributions of punishments. You have this also in the apocryphal Scriptures, which the Catholic canon indeed does not admit, but which are so much the more pleasing to you as they are excluded from the Catholic canon. Let me also cite something thence, by whose authority I am not held, but you are convicted. In the Acts written by Leucius, which he writes as though the Acts of the Apostles, you have it thus set down:
22:84
etenim speciosa figmenta et ostentatio simulata et coactio uisibilium nec quidem ex propria natura procedunt, sed ex eo homine, qui per se ipsum deterior factus est per seductionem. uide quemadmodum hic et per se ipsum\' dixit et per seductionem\'. fuit enim seductor hominis diabolus, non natura peccator, sed prior uoluntate peccator. sed quia erat in hominis potestate seductori non consentire, ideo positum est et per se ipsum\' et per seductionem\', ut in eo, quod positum est per se ipsum\', liberum arbitrium, in eo uero, quod positum est per seductionem\' intellegas diabolum, non obpressorem inuiti, sed tentatorem uolentis.
因為那華美的虛構、假裝的炫耀、以及可見之物的逼迫,實在不是出於它們自己的本性,而是出於那藉自己而經誘惑變得更壞的人。看他在此如何既說「藉他自己」,又說「藉誘惑」。因為魔鬼是人的誘惑者,本性上並非罪人,而是先憑意志成為罪人。但因為不順從那誘惑者乃在人的權能之中,所以「藉他自己」和「藉誘惑」二者都被記下,好使你在所記「藉他自己」中明白自由意志,而在所記「藉誘惑」中明白魔鬼——他並非壓制不情願者,而是試探情願者。
For indeed specious fabrications and feigned ostentation and the compulsion of visible things do not proceed from their own nature, but from that man who through his own self was made worse through seduction. See how here he said both "through his own self" and "through seduction." For the devil was the seducer of man, not a sinner by nature, but a sinner first by will. But because it was in man's power not to consent to the seducer, therefore both "through his own self" and "through seduction" were set down, so that in what is set down "through his own self" you may understand free will, and in what is set down "through seduction" you may understand the devil, not the oppressor of the unwilling, but the tempter of the willing.
22:85
Proinde, quia ego respondi et, quantum potui, probaui ea, quae scripta sunt in libris sanctis de peccatoribus et de iustis non ad diuersitatem naturarum, sed ad distinctionem meritorum pertinere, in quibus meritis non necessitatem natura facit, sed uoluntas culpam, responde tu ad illud, quod iam interrogaui: si deo nocere nihil poterat, quare partem suam, substantiam suam, hoc quod ipse est, polluendam et. ligandam daemonibus miscuerit, quod in nulla diuina scriptura canonica potueris inuenire; si autem nocere ei poterat, non deum incorruptibilem colitis, de quo apostolus dicit: regi autem saeculorum inmortali, inuisibili, incorruptibili, soli deo honor et gloria in saecula saeculorum.
因此,既然我已回答,並竭盡所能證明了聖書中論到罪人與義人的話,並非關乎諸本性的差異,而是關乎應得的區別——在這應得之中,不是本性造成必然性,而是意志造成過失——那麼請你回答我已經問過的:若沒有什麼能傷害神,他為何把他自己的一部分、他自己的本質、他自己所是的那本質,與眾魔相混以致被玷污、被捆綁——這你在任何正典的神聖經卷中都找不到;但它若能傷害他,你們所敬拜的便不是不朽壞的神,就是使徒論到他所說的:「但願尊貴榮耀歸與那不朽、不可見、不朽壞、萬世之王、獨一的神,直到永永遠遠。」
Accordingly, since I have answered and, as far as I could, proved that the things written in the holy books concerning sinners and the just pertain not to a diversity of natures, but to a distinction of deserts — in which deserts it is not nature that makes necessity, but will that makes the fault — do you answer to that which I have already asked: if nothing could harm God, why did he mingle his own part, his own substance, that which he himself is, with the demons to be polluted and bound — which you could not find in any canonical divine Scripture; but if it could harm him, you do not worship an incorruptible God, of whom the Apostle says: but to the King of the ages, immortal, invisible, incorruptible, to God alone, be honour and glory forever and ever.
22:86
denique item dicit: deus habitat lucem inaccessibilem. numquid ad illam lucem non accedunt sancti, de quibus scriptum est: accedite ad eum et inluminamini? numquid ad illam lucem non accedunt sancti, de quibus dicitur: beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt? sed quia non ad eam potest accedere, nisi cui deus ipse donauerit. ut accedat, ideo per se ipsam inaccessibilis est. nemo enim potest ad eam accedere, quem deus noluerit, ut accedat; cui autem donauerit, ipse accedet. quomodo ergo poterat illa gens tenebrarum ad habitationem dei accedere, ubi est inaccessibilis lux, quo non accedit, nisi cui deus donauerit?
接著他同樣說:神住在人不能靠近的光中。難道聖徒不靠近那光嗎?就是那論到他們所記的:「你們仰望他,就得光照」?難道聖徒不靠近那光嗎?就是那論到他們所說的:「清心的人有福了,因為他們必得見神」?但因為除了神自己所恩准可以靠近的人以外,無人能靠近它,所以它本身是不能靠近的。因為凡神不願其靠近的,無人能靠近它;但神所恩准的,那人便必靠近。那麼那黑暗的族類怎能靠近神的居所,就是那光不能靠近之處,除了神所恩准的人以外無人靠近的呢?
Then likewise he says: God dwells in unapproachable light. Do the saints not approach that light, of whom it is written: "Come to him and be enlightened"? Do the saints not approach that light, of whom it is said: "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God"? But because none can approach it, save he to whom God himself has granted that he may approach, therefore in itself it is unapproachable. For no one can approach it whom God has not willed to approach; but to whom he has granted, that one will approach. How then could that race of darkness approach the dwelling of God, where the light is unapproachable, to which none approaches, save he to whom God has granted?
22:87
aut si donum acceperat a deo, ut accederet, ad expugnandum regnum dei non daret et non timeret. si autem donum tale non dederat, ut posset accedere, securus in suo regno erat habitans inaccessibilem lucem, quid poterat de tenebrarum gente metuere, ut ei misceret partem suam, substantiam suam, hoc quod ipse est. ligandam, premendam. contaminandam, ubi non solum miserabiliter teneretur, sed etiam turpiter purgaretur?
或者,若他從神領受了恩賜得以前進,他便不會屈服於攻打神的國度,也不會害怕。但若神並未賜下這樣的恩賜使他能夠前進,那麼神安然居住在自己的國度中,住在人不能靠近的光裡,祂又何須懼怕黑暗的族類,以致要把自己的一部分、自己的本體、也就是祂自身,與之混合——好叫這部分被捆綁、被壓制、被玷污,在那裡不但可悲地被拘禁,甚至還要可恥地被潔淨呢?
Or if he had received a gift from God enabling him to advance, he would not have surrendered to the assaulting of the kingdom of God, nor would he have been afraid. But if He had given no such gift by which he might advance, then, dwelling secure in His own kingdom, inhabiting light inaccessible, what could He fear from the race of darkness, that He should mingle with it His own portion, His own substance, that which He Himself is — to be bound, to be pressed down, to be defiled, where it would not only be held wretchedly, but even be purged shamefully?
22:88
ut enim purgetur inde, dicitisquod audire nefas est, sed ad uos confundendos et forte saluandos tacere non possumusut purgetur inde pars dei, dicitis in naue lucis, quam solem appellatis, facientes iniuriam creatori solis et ipsi soli, quem sic dicitis factum, ubi tanta turpitudo celebretur; dicitis enim . illic positum deum uirtutes suas conuertere in masculos ad inritandum concupiscentias daemonum feminarum et eosdem rursus conuertere in feminas ad inritandum concupiscentias daemonum masculorum. ut cum daemoniis iniciunt libidinem accensis in formas confictas a deo, relaxentur membra eorum, et sic euadat pars dei, quae ibi fuerit colligata.
因為你們說,神的那部分在那裡被潔淨——這是連聽都不合法的事,然而為要使你們羞愧、或許得救,我們不能緘默——你們說,神的一部分在你們稱為太陽的「光之船」中被潔淨,這樣便侮辱了太陽的創造者,也侮辱了太陽本身,你們竟說它是為了讓如此醜惡之事在其中上演而被造。因為你們說:神被安置在那裡,把祂的能力變為男性,去激起雌性魔鬼的情慾,又把同樣的能力變為女性,去激起雄性魔鬼的情慾,好叫這些魔鬼因被神所塑造的形象所點燃、萌生淫慾時,牠們的肢體便鬆弛,於是被囚在那裡的神的那一部分便得以逃脫。
For you say that it is purged there — a thing it is unlawful even to hear, yet for your confounding and perhaps your salvation we cannot keep silent — you say that God's portion is purged there, in the ship of light which you call the sun, thereby doing injury to the Creator of the sun and to the sun itself, which you say was made in such a way that so great a foulness should be enacted there. For you say that God, set there, turns His powers into males to inflame the lusts of the female demons, and turns those same powers again into females to inflame the lusts of the male demons; so that, when they cast lust upon the demons who are kindled toward the forms fashioned by God, the members of those demons are relaxed, and thus the portion of God which had been bound up there escapes.
22:89
hoc tantum obprobrium, hoc tantum sacrilegium credere ausi estis et praedicare non dubitatis. haec sunt media doctrinae uestrae. finis uero quis est ? quis, nisi quia non potuit deus totum purgare ? et quia non potuit, facturum eum dicitis uelut tectorium genti tenebrarum, ut ibi in aeternum damnetur, quod purgari non potuit et nihil sua sponte commisit. ita fit, ut deus uester. non uerus, sed fictus, non alicubi constitutus, sed in corde uestro imaginatus, partem suam misceat infeliciter, purget turpiter, damnet crudeliter. ad haec ergo responde et incipe ab illo, quod dixi: quare deus miscuit istam partem suam, cui nihil nocere poterat? aut si potuit, quomodo sit incorruptibilis. FEL.
如此重大的羞辱、如此重大的褻瀆,你們竟敢相信,並且毫不遲疑地宣講。這些是你們教義的中段。至於結局又是什麼呢?無非是說神無法潔淨全部。既然祂無法潔淨,你們便說祂要把它當作黑暗族類上的一層塗抹,使那無法被潔淨、又並非出於己意犯罪的部分永遠被定罪。於是就成了這樣:你們的神——並非真神,而是虛構的神,並非安置於任何處所,而是想像在你們心中——不幸地混合祂的一部分,可恥地潔淨它,又殘忍地定它的罪。那麼,請就這些回答,並從我所說的開始:神為何把祂那不能被任何事物傷害的一部分混入其中?若能被傷害,祂又怎能是不朽的呢?費利克斯
So great a reproach, so great a sacrilege you have dared to believe, and you do not hesitate to preach it. These are the middle parts of your doctrine. But what is the end? What, except that God could not purge the whole? And because He could not, you say He will make it, as it were, a plastering over the race of darkness, so that there may be damned forever what could not be purged and committed no fault of its own accord. So it comes about that your God — not the true one, but a fabricated one, not established anywhere, but imagined in your own heart — mingles His portion unhappily, purges it shamefully, and damns it cruelly. Answer, then, to these things, and begin with what I have said: why did God mingle that portion of His, to which nothing could do harm? Or if it could be harmed, how can He be incorruptible? FELIX
22:90
dixit: Crudelem adseritis Manichaeum haec dicentem; de Christo quid dicimus, qui dixit: ite in ignem aeternum? AUG, dixit: Peccatoribus hoc dixit. FEL. dixit: Isti peccatores quare non purgati sunt? AU6. dixit: Quia noluerunt. FEL. dixit: Quia noluerunt. hoc dixisti? . AUG. dixit: Hoc dixi, quia noluerunt. FEL. dixit: Quare noluerunt? est, qui non uult curari? est, qui non uult purgari ? est, qui non uult inluminari ? quia infirmus est, qui non uult ad sanitatem uenire? si crudele est, quod Manichaeus dicit, quia aliqua pars dei, quae se purgare non potuit. in globo ligata est, hoc crudele non est, ut Christus, qui dixit:
他說:你們斷言摩尼說這些話很殘忍;那麼對於那位說「進入永火」的基督,我們又怎麼說呢?奧古斯丁說:祂是對罪人說這話的。費利克斯說:這些罪人為何沒有被潔淨?奧古斯丁說:因為他們不願意。費利克斯說:「因為他們不願意」——你是這樣說的嗎?奧古斯丁說:我是這樣說的——因為他們不願意。費利克斯說:他們為何不願意?難道有人不願意得醫治嗎?有人不願意被潔淨嗎?有人不願意得光照嗎?那不願意來得健康的人,豈不是軟弱嗎?若摩尼所說的是殘忍的——即神的某一部分因無法潔淨自己而被捆綁在那團塊中——那麼那說了以下這話的基督,豈不也殘忍嗎……
He said: You assert that Mani is cruel for saying these things; but what do we say of Christ, who said, 'Go into the eternal fire'? AUGUSTINE said: He said this to sinners. FELIX said: Why were these sinners not purged? AUGUSTINE said: Because they were unwilling. FELIX said: 'Because they were unwilling' — did you say this? AUGUSTINE said: I did say it — because they were unwilling. FELIX said: Why were they unwilling? Is there anyone who does not wish to be healed? Is there anyone who does not wish to be purged? Is there anyone who does not wish to be enlightened? Is he weak who does not wish to come to health? If what Mani says is cruel — that some portion of God, which could not purge itself, has been bound in the mass — is this not cruel, that Christ, who said…
22:91
ego propter peccatores ueni, modo ad ignem aeternum illos mittat, cuius nomen portauerunt? sed mandata, credo, non potuerunt conplere. si hoc crudele est. crudelius est et illud; si illud crudelius est, quia deus illos non potuit purgare et globo ligauit, et id crudelius uidetur esse, quod Christus non potuit purgare, ad ignem aeternum mittere. hoc mihi sanctitas tua exponat de ipsa crudelitate. AUG. dixit: Si ea, quae iam dixi, uel intellexisses uel te intellegere fatererisfortassis enim non habendo quod dicas finxisti te non intellegere, quod apertum estista non diceres. iam enim diximus et probauimus per diuinas scripturas esse liberum arbitrium;
「我是為罪人而來」——如今卻把他們送入永火,儘管他們曾承載祂的名?但我想,他們是無法遵守誡命吧。若這是殘忍的,那另一件更加殘忍;而若那件更殘忍——就是神無法潔淨他們、把他們捆綁在團塊中——那麼這件也顯得更殘忍:基督既無法潔淨他們,卻把他們送入永火。願你的聖德為我解說這殘忍本身。奧古斯丁說:你若曾理解我已說過的話,或願承認你理解它——因為或許你無話可說,便假裝不明白那顯而易見的事——你就不會說這些了。因為我們已藉神聖的經文說明並證實了自由意志的存在;
'I came for the sake of sinners' — and yet now sends them into eternal fire, though they bore His name? But, I suppose, they could not fulfill the commandments. If this is cruel, that too is more cruel; and if that is more cruel — namely, that God could not purge them and bound them in the mass — then this also seems more cruel: that Christ, being unable to purge them, sends them into eternal fire. Let your Holiness expound this to me concerning that very cruelty. AUGUSTINE said: If you had either understood what I have already said, or would admit that you understand it — for perhaps, having nothing to say, you have feigned not to understand what is plain — you would not say these things. For we have already said and proved through the divine Scriptures that there is free will;
22:92
deum autem liberi arbitrii iustum iudicem, remuneratorem fidelium eique se subicientium et uolentium se sanari, damna.torem autem superborum et inpiorum. quia ergo ad peccatores sanandos uenit, sanat utique peccata confessos, sanat paenitentes; neminem autem paenitet, cum alius peccauit, sed si est paenitentia iusta et uerax, unde et ipse dominus dicit: non ueni uocare iustos, sed peccatores in paenitentiam. ipsa paenitentia indicat non alienae esse naturae, sed uoluntatis nostrae, si quid forte peccamus. nam si alio peccante alium paenitet, non est ista prudens, sed insana paenitentia. secundum uos autem nulla peccata sunt. gens enim tenebrarum non peccat, quia suam naturam facit;
又說明神是自由意志的公義審判者,是信徒、以及那些順服祂並願受醫治之人的賞賜者,卻是驕傲者與不敬虔者的定罪者。既然祂是為醫治罪人而來,祂當然醫治那些認罪的人,醫治那些悔改的人;但沒有人會因別人犯了罪而悔改——除非那悔改是公義而真實的——正如主自己所說:「我來本不是召義人,乃是召罪人悔改。」這悔改本身表明:我們所犯的任何罪,並非屬於某個異己的本性,而是屬於我們自己的意志。因為若一人因另一人犯罪而悔改,那不是明智的悔改,而是瘋狂的悔改。然而按你們所說,根本沒有罪;因為黑暗族類不犯罪,既然它是照著自己的本性行事;
and that God is the just judge of free will, the rewarder of the faithful and of those who submit to Him and are willing to be healed, but the condemner of the proud and the ungodly. Since, therefore, He came to heal sinners, He surely heals those who confess their sins, He heals the penitent; but no one repents when another has sinned — rather, if the repentance is just and true — whence the Lord Himself says: 'I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.' This very repentance shows that whatever we may sin belongs not to an alien nature, but to our own will. For if one man repents when another sins, that is not prudent but insane repentance. But according to you there are no sins at all; for the race of darkness does not sin, because it acts according to its own nature;
22:93
natura lucis non peccat, quia quod facit, facere cogitur. nullum ergo inuenis peccatum, quod damnet deus, nullum inuenis peccatum, quod paenitentia possit sanari. si. autem paenitentia est, et culpa est; si culpa est, et uoluntas est; si uoluntas est in peccando. natura non est, quae cogat. sed si quid infirmitatis patiuntur, qui non possunt inplere, quod uoluntunde apostolus dicit: uideo aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae et captiuantem me in legem peccati, quae est in membris meismanifestum est hoc uenisse de traduce primi peccati Adam et de consuetudine mala.
光的本性也不犯罪,因為它所行的,是被迫去行的。因此你們找不到任何神可以定罪的罪,也找不到任何悔改可以醫治的罪。但若有悔改,就也有過失;若有過失,就也有意志;若在犯罪中有意志,就沒有本性在強迫。然而,若那些不能成就所願之事的人受某種軟弱之苦——正如使徒所說:「我覺得肢體中另有個律,和我心中的律交戰,把我擄去,叫我附從那肢體中犯罪的律」——那麼顯然這是出於亞當頭一次犯罪所遺傳的種子,以及惡習。
and the nature of light does not sin, because what it does, it is compelled to do. Therefore you find no sin which God may condemn, you find no sin which repentance can heal. But if there is repentance, there is also fault; if there is fault, there is also will; if there is will in sinning, there is no nature compelling it. Yet if those who cannot fulfill what they will suffer some infirmity — whence the Apostle says: 'I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members' — it is manifest that this has come from the transmitted stock of the first sin of Adam, and from evil habit.
22:94
nam hodieque libera uoluntate faciunt homines consuetudinem, quam cum fecerint, facile superare non possunt; ipsi ergo sibi de se ipsis fecerunt, quod contra eos lex habitet in membris eorum. sed qui concipiunt timorem dei et per liberum arbitrium subdunt se sanandos optimo medico et sicut bono curatori. ita et misericordi creatori, per humilitatem confessionis et paenitentiae sanantur. superbi uero dicentes se iustos aut dicendo, quia non peccant ipsi, sed aliud in illis peccat et alia natura de illis peccat, per ipsam superbiam suam et insanabiles fiunt et experiuntur iustum iudicium dei, qui superbis resistit, humilibus autem dat gratiam. non est ergo indignum, ut deus dicat:
因為即使在今日,人也憑自由意志養成習慣,一旦養成,便不易勝過;因此是他們自己給自己招來這事,使那律在他們肢體中與他們作對。但那些懷有敬畏神之心、憑自由意志把自己交給最好的醫生受醫治的人,如同交給良善的療治者,也如同交給慈悲的創造者,便藉著認罪與悔改的謙卑而得醫治。至於那些自稱為義、或說犯罪的不是他們自己、而是他們裡面的別物、是另一個本性從他們裡面犯罪的驕傲人,正因這驕傲,既變得無可救藥,又親身經歷神公義的審判——這神「抵擋驕傲的人,賜恩給謙卑的人」。因此,神說以下這話並非不恰當:
For even today men form habits by free will, and once they have formed them, they cannot easily overcome them; they themselves, therefore, have brought it upon themselves that the law dwells against them in their members. But those who conceive the fear of God and through free will submit themselves to the best physician to be healed, and as to a good healer, so also to a merciful Creator, are healed through the humility of confession and of repentance. The proud, however, saying that they are righteous, or saying that it is not they themselves who sin, but something else in them and another nature that sins out of them — by their very pride become both incurable and experience the just judgment of God, who resists the proud but gives grace to the humble. It is not unfitting, therefore, that God should say:
22:95
ite in ignem aeternum eis, qui eius misericordiam per liberum arbitrium respuerunt, et dicat: uenite, benedicti patris mei, percipite regnum eis, qui per liberum arbitrium fidem eius susceperunt, peccata sua confessi sunt, paenitentiam egerunt, displicuerunt sibi, quales fuerunt et quales per eum facti sunt, illi placuerunt. tu ergo iam ad hoc, quod interrogaui, respondesed impetrem a te, ne moras superfluas faciamus —: si deo nocere nihil poterat, quare huc nos misit ? si nocere poterat, non est incorruptibilis deus. FEL. dixit: Si deo nocere nihil poterat, quare huc misit filium suum ?- AUG. dixit: Uide, quemadmodum semper interrogas et ad interrogata respondere non uis.
對那些憑自由意志拒絕祂憐憫的人說「進入永火」,又對那些憑自由意志領受祂信仰、承認己罪、行了悔改、對自己從前的樣子感到不悅、並因祂而成為蒙祂喜悅之人的人說「你們這蒙我父賜福的,可來承受這國」。那麼,你如今就回答我所問的——但請容我從你這裡得到這一點,就是我們不作多餘的拖延——:若沒有什麼能傷害神,祂為何差我們到這裡來?若有什麼能傷害祂,神就不是不朽的。費利克斯說:若沒有什麼能傷害神,祂為何差祂的兒子到這裡來?奧古斯丁說:你看,你總是在發問,卻不肯回答所問的問題。
'Go into the eternal fire' to those who have spurned His mercy through free will, and to say, 'Come, blessed of my Father, receive the kingdom' to those who through free will have received His faith, have confessed their sins, have done penance, have been displeased with themselves as they were, and have pleased Him as they were made to be through Him. You, therefore, now answer to what I asked — but let me obtain this from you, that we make no superfluous delays —: if nothing could harm God, why did He send us here? If it could harm Him, God is not incorruptible. FELIX said: If nothing could harm God, why did He send His Son here? AUGUSTINE said: See how you are always asking questions and are unwilling to answer what is asked.
22:96
audi, quod interrogasti, memento tamen te ad ea, quae dico, non respondere, me autem respondere. deo nocere nihil potest; sed filium suum misit, ut carne indueretur et hominibus adpareret, peccatores sanaret, in ipsa carne pateretur pro nobis, quam sumpsit ex nobis. in sua quippe natura pati nihil poterat, quia in principio erat uerbum et uerbum erat apud deum et deus erat uerbum. in hac natura, quia deus erat uerbum, pati nihil ille poterat. ut autem pati pro nobis posset, uerbum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis. uerbum caro factum est adsumendo carnem, non mutatum in carnem; adsumpsit enim humanitatem, non amisit diuinitatem.
聽你所問的——但要記得:你不回答我所說的,而我卻回答。沒有什麼能傷害神;但祂差祂的兒子披上肉身、向人顯現,來醫治罪人,並在那從我們所取的肉身中為我們受苦。因為在祂自己的本性中祂不能受任何苦,既然「太初有道,道與神同在,道就是神。」在這本性中,既然道就是神,祂不能受任何苦。但為要能為我們受苦,「道成了肉身,住在我們中間。」道成肉身,是藉著取了肉身,而非變成肉身;因為祂取了人性,卻沒有失去神性。
Hear what you have asked — yet remember that you do not answer what I say, while I do answer. Nothing can harm God; but He sent His Son to be clothed in flesh and to appear to men, to heal sinners, and in that very flesh to suffer for us, which flesh He took from us. For in His own nature He could suffer nothing, because 'in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.' In this nature, since the Word was God, He could suffer nothing. But that He might be able to suffer for us, 'the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.' The Word was made flesh by taking flesh, not by being changed into flesh; for He assumed humanity, He did not lose divinity.
22:97
itaque idem deus et idem homo in natura dei aequalis patri, in natura hominis. factus mortalis, in nobis, pro nobis, de nobis, manens quod erat, suscipiens quod non erat, ut liberaret quod fecerat, non quod erat. non est ergo passio Christi ex indigentia, sed ex misericordia. praebuit enim exemplum patientiae nobis de nobis, id est homini de homine, carni de carne; non tamen in illa carne ipse deterior factus, sed caro in illo melior facta est. pars uero dei uestri nulla carne adsumptanon enim erat in gente tenebrarum, pro quo patereturdescendit, ut teneretur, ligaretur, pollueretur et turpius . quam ligabatur purgaretur. iam enim de purgatione eius dixi.
如此,同一位既是神又是人:按神的本性與父同等,按人的本性成為必死的;在我們中間、為我們、出於我們;仍是祂本來的樣子,卻取了祂本非的樣子,好叫祂能拯救祂所造的,而非祂本來所是的。所以基督的受難不是出於匱乏,而是出於憐憫。因為祂從我們自身、給我們立下忍耐的榜樣——就是以人給人、以肉身給肉身;然而祂自己在那肉身中並未變壞,反倒那肉身在祂裡面變得更好。但你們那神的一部分,並未取任何肉身——因為在黑暗族類中並無可為之受苦的對象——卻降下去,好被拘禁、被捆綁、被玷污,並被以比受捆綁更醜惡的方式潔淨。因為關於它的潔淨我已說過了。
And so the same is God and the same is man: in the nature of God equal to the Father, in the nature of man made mortal; among us, for us, from us; remaining what He was, taking up what He was not, that He might free what He had made, not what He was. The passion of Christ, therefore, is not from need, but from mercy. For He offered us an example of patience out of ourselves — that is, to man out of man, to flesh out of flesh; yet He Himself was not made worse in that flesh, but the flesh was made better in Him. But the portion of your god, having taken up no flesh — for there was none in the race of darkness for whom He might suffer — descended in order to be held, to be bound, to be defiled, and to be purged more foully than it was bound. For I have already spoken of its purging.
22:98
haec omnia quanto indigniora sunt, tanto utique faciliora ad intellegendum, quoniam in naturam dei ista non cadunt. et absit a pio animo et fideli talia de deo credere, deo bono, deo uero, qualia uos creditis, non quem inuenistis, sed quem finxistis. responde iam nunc: si deo nocere nihil poterat, pura illa substantia ipsius nulla carne adsumpta in se passura, si quid passura erat, non in carne quam non susceperat, quare huc missa est secundum uestra uaniloquia? FEL. dixit: Si nihil poterat noceri deo a parte aduersa et Christo nihil poterat noceri ab aduersa natura, ad quam uenit Christus, ut eam liberaret? quia, ut dicis, propter libertatem nostram uenit. ergo in captiuitate fuimus.
這一切事,愈是不配於神,就愈確實容易理解,既然它們並不落在神的本性上。願敬虔而忠信的心靈絕不相信你們對神——對那良善的神、真實的神——所信的那等事:那不是你們所尋見的神,而是你們所虛構的神。如今回答:若沒有什麼能傷害神,既然祂那純潔的本體並未取任何肉身、在其自身中將不受任何苦——即便將受任何苦,也不是在它未曾取的肉身中——那麼按你們空洞的胡言,它為何被差到這裡來?費利克斯說:若在神裡面沒有什麼能被敵對的一方所傷害,在基督裡面也沒有什麼能被敵對的本性所傷害,那麼基督來釋放的又是什麼呢?因為,如你所說,祂是為我們的自由而來。既然如此,我們曾在被擄之中。
All these things, the more unworthy they are, the easier they are certainly to understand, since they do not fall upon the nature of God. And far be it from a pious and faithful soul to believe such things about God — about the good God, the true God — as you believe: not the God you have found, but the one you have fabricated. Answer now: if nothing could harm God, since that pure substance of His, having taken up no flesh, was going to suffer nothing in itself — if it was going to suffer anything, not in the flesh which it had not taken up — why was it sent here according to your empty babblings? FELIX said: If nothing could be harmed in God by the adverse party, and nothing could be harmed in Christ by the adverse nature, to which Christ came to free it? For, as you say, He came for the sake of our liberty. Therefore we were in captivity.
22:99
si in captiuitate tenebamur et propterea Christus uenit, ut nos liberaret, de captiuitate, qui nos tenebat, extraneus a deo erat aut uirtus dei. si dei uirtus erat, qui nos tenebat, utquid Christum mittebat ille, qui nos tenebat? si in ipsius arbitrio erat, quando uellet dimittere, utquid Christus crucifigitur? neminem ergo latet Christum crucifixum. quid illum crucifixerunt ? si dei uirtus est, nihil nobis nocebat. si dei uirtus erat, non fuimus capti apud illum, sed quasi nos cum nostro principe, quasi filius cum parentibus, non autem Romani cum barbaris. non oportebat ergo, quia cum uirtute dei constituti eramus, deum filium suum mittere, ut dicatur, quia liberator noster uenit.
若我們被拘在被擄之中,基督為此而來釋放我們——那麼拘禁我們的那位,若不是神以外的異者,便是神的一種能力。若拘禁我們的是神的能力,那麼拘禁我們的那位為何要差基督來?若隨時釋放我們是在他自己的意願中,那麼基督為何被釘十字架?因為基督被釘十字架,這事無人不知。他們為何釘祂十字架?若那是神的能力,它並未害我們。若那是神的能力,我們就不是與他同為被擄的,倒像是我們與自己的君王同在,如同兒子與父母同在,而不像羅馬人與蠻族同在。因此,既然我們是與神的能力同立的,神就無需差祂的兒子,以致有人說:我們的拯救者來了。
If we were held in captivity, and Christ came for that reason, to free us — then he who held us in captivity was either a stranger to God, or a power of God. If it was a power of God who held us, why did that same one who held us send Christ? If it lay in his own choice to release us whenever he wished, why is Christ crucified? For it is hidden from no one that Christ was crucified. Why did they crucify Him? If it is a power of God, it did us no harm. If it was a power of God, we were not captives with him, but rather, as it were, we with our own prince, as a son with his parents, and not as Romans with barbarians. It was not fitting, therefore — since we were established with the power of God — for God to send His Son, so that it might be said that our liberator has come.
22:100
si paret ergo nos cum uirtute dei constitutos esse, apostolus dixit: Christus nos liberauit de maledicto legis, quia scriptum est: maledictus omnis, qui pendet in ligno. hoc enim apostolus dicit. si iste, qui male dicit omnes, qui pendent in ligno, dei uirtus estChristus enim pependit in ligno et apostoli ipsius omnes, qui addicti sunt pro ipsius praeceptoquis est iste ergo, qui maledicit omnem, qui pendet in ligno? AUG. dixit: Quos Christus redemit a diabolo, per consensionem suam tenebantur a diabolo et in eius condicione constituti erant per iustum dei iudicium, cui seducenti consenserant per liberum arbitrium.
那麼,若顯明我們是與神的能力同立的,使徒卻說:「基督既為我們受了咒詛,就贖出我們脫離律法的咒詛,因為經上記著:凡掛在木頭上的都是被咒詛的。」使徒是這樣說的。若這位咒詛一切掛在木頭上之人的,就是神的能力——因為基督掛在木頭上,祂所有的使徒也因祂的命令被交付而如此——那麼這位咒詛一切掛在木頭上之人的,又是誰呢?奧古斯丁說:那些被基督從魔鬼手中所贖的人,是藉自己的同意被魔鬼所拘的,並藉神公義的審判被置於他的權勢之下,因為他們憑自由意志順從了魔鬼的引誘。
If, then, it appears that we were established with the power of God, the Apostle said: 'Christ has freed us from the curse of the law, for it is written: Cursed is everyone who hangs upon a tree.' For this the Apostle says. If this one who curses all who hang upon a tree is the power of God — for Christ hung upon a tree, and all His apostles, who were given over for His precept's sake — who then is this one who curses everyone who hangs upon a tree? AUGUSTINE said: Those whom Christ redeemed from the devil were held by the devil through their own consent, and had been placed under his condition by the just judgment of God, to whose seduction they had consented through free will.
22:101
sicut autem in hominis potestate fuit diabolo consentire, ut captiuaretur, sic in ipsius diaboli potestate fuit, cum angelus esset, peccare, ut in deterius mutaretur. peccator ergo angelus per liberum arbitrium suasit peccatum homini habenti liberum arbitrium, ut diabolus, si noluisset, non peccasset et homo, si noluisset, non consensisset. cum autem iam ab illo, cui consenserat; teneretur, non quia diabolus aliquid potuit, sed quia dei iustum iudicium fuit dare in potestatem diaboli hominem, qui contempsit super se potestatem dei et eius legi obtemperare noluit:
但正如順從魔鬼、以致被擄,是在人的權能之內;照樣,犯罪、以致變為更壞的境地,當初也在魔鬼自己的權能之內,因為他本是天使。所以,那藉自由意志成為罪人的天使,勸誘同樣有自由意志的人去犯罪;以致魔鬼若不願意,本不會犯罪,人若不願意,本不會順從。但人一旦被他所順從的那位所拘,這並非因魔鬼有任何自己的權能,而是因這乃神公義的審判:把那藐視神在他之上的權柄、不肯順從祂律法的人,交在魔鬼的權下:
But just as it lay in man's power to consent to the devil, so that he might be taken captive, so it lay in the devil's own power, when he was an angel, to sin, so that he might be changed into something worse. The angel, therefore, having become a sinner through free will, persuaded to sin the man who had free will; so that the devil, if he had not willed, would not have sinned, and the man, if he had not willed, would not have consented. But once he was now held by the one to whom he had consented, it was not because the devil had any power of his own, but because it was the just judgment of God to give into the devil's power the man who despised the power of God over himself and would not obey His law:
22:102
quia ergo sic inuenit Christus peccatores sub peccato, cum sit peccatum in libero arbitrio, inueniens peccatores sub peccato redemit confitentes a superbiente. quod autem in lege positum est: maledictus omnis, qui pendet in ligno, unde apo-. stolus dicit: Christus nos redemit de maledicto legis, factus pro nobis maledictum; scriptum est enim: maledictus omnis, qui pendet in ligno, non legem reprehendit, sed misericordiam domini commendauit. quia enim Adam peccauerat et omnis illa massa et propago peccati maledicta erat, dominus autem carnem de ipsa massa suscipere uoluit, ut suscipiendo mortalitatem. quae de poena uenerat, solueret mortem, quod de gratia ueniebat, ideo dicit lex:
既然如此,基督既如此發現罪人在罪之下——罪是在自由意志之中——祂發現罪人在罪之下,便從那自高的一方贖出那些認罪的人。至於律法上所定的:「凡掛在木頭上的都是被咒詛的」,使徒因此說:「基督既為我們成了咒詛,就贖出我們脫離律法的咒詛;因為經上記著:凡掛在木頭上的都是被咒詛的」——他並非責備律法,而是稱揚主的憐憫。因為既然亞當犯了罪,那整團罪的團塊與後裔都受了咒詛,主卻願意從那同一團塊取了肉身,好叫祂藉著取了那從刑罰而來的必死性,除滅那死亡——這是出於恩典而來的——所以律法說:
since, therefore, Christ thus found sinners under sin — sin being in the free will — finding sinners under sin, He redeemed those who confessed from the one who was exalting himself. But as to what is set down in the law, 'Cursed is everyone who hangs upon a tree,' whence the Apostle says, 'Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us; for it is written: Cursed is everyone who hangs upon a tree' — he does not reproach the law, but commends the mercy of the Lord. For because Adam had sinned, and all that mass and offspring of sin was accursed, but the Lord willed to take flesh from that same mass, so that by taking up mortality, which had come from punishment, He might loose death — a thing which came from grace — therefore the law says:
22:103
maledictus omnis, qui pendet in ligno. mors enim ipsa pendebat in ligno, quae mors de maledicto ueniebat. quomodo ergo suscipiendo mortem interfecit mortem, sic suscipiendo maledictum soluit maledictum. unde et apostolus dicit: scientes, quia uetus homo noster simul confixus est cruci cum illo, quia de uetere homine nostro, id est de sorte mortis, quae ueniebat ex merito peccati, suscipere dignatus est carnem mortalem de uirgine Maria, in qua nobis et passionis et resurrectionis praeberet exemplumpassionis ad firmandam patientiam, resurrectionis ad excitandam spemut duas uitas nobis ostenderet in carne, quam suscepit de uita nostra mortali, unam laboriosam. alteram beatam:
「凡掛在木頭上的都是被咒詛的。」因為死亡本身掛在木頭上,就是那從咒詛而來的死亡。因此,正如祂藉取了死亡而殺了死亡,照樣祂藉取了咒詛而解除了咒詛。使徒也因此說:「知道我們的舊人和祂同釘十字架」——因為祂從我們的舊人,也就是從那因罪的功而來的死亡之份,甘願從童貞女馬利亞取了必死的肉身,好在其中給我們立下受難與復活的榜樣——受難是為堅固忍耐,復活是為激發盼望——好叫祂在祂從我們必死之生命所取的肉身中,向我們顯明兩種生命:一種是勞苦的,另一種是有福的;
'Cursed is everyone who hangs upon a tree.' For death itself hung upon the tree, that death which came from the curse. As, therefore, by taking up death He slew death, so by taking up the curse He loosed the curse. Whence also the Apostle says: 'Knowing that our old man was crucified together with Him' — because from our old man, that is, from the lot of death which came by the desert of sin, He deigned to take up mortal flesh from the Virgin Mary, in which He might offer us an example both of passion and of resurrection — of passion to strengthen patience, of resurrection to arouse hope — that He might show us two lives in the flesh which He took up from our mortal life: the one toilsome, the other blessed;
22:104
laboriosam, quam tolerare debemus, beatam, quam sperare. debemus. toleramus autem laboriosam merito peccati nostri; ille autem ostendit eam in carne sua, non merito iniquitatis suae. sed. officio misericordiae suae. nam ut noueris bonam esse legem, quam tu reprehendere uoluisti, ipse apostolus Paulus quodam loco dixit: lex subintrauit, ut abundaret delictum. adhuc uidetur illam reprehendere; sed audi quod sequitur: ubi autem, inquit. abundauit delictum, superabundauit gratia. data est enim lex superbis hominibus et uiribus suis totum tribuentibus, ut cum inplere non possent legem datam, praeuaricatores inuenirentur et facti rei sub lege peferent misericordiam a legis conditore.
那勞苦的,是我們必須忍受的;那有福的,是我們必須盼望的。但我們忍受那勞苦的,是因我們自己罪的功;祂卻在祂的肉身中顯明它,並非因祂自己有任何不義的功,而是出於祂憐憫的職分。因為,好叫你知道你所想責備的律法是良善的,使徒保羅自己在某處說:「律法本是外添的,叫過犯顯多。」他似乎仍在責備它;但要聽下文:「只是」他說「罪在哪裡顯多,恩典就更顯多了。」因為律法是賜給那些把一切都歸於自己力量的驕傲人,好叫他們既無法遵守所賜的律法,就被顯為犯法的,並在律法之下成了有罪的,便向律法的創立者祈求憐憫。
the toilsome, which we must endure; the blessed, which we must hope for. But we endure the toilsome by the desert of our own sin; He, however, displayed it in His flesh, not by the desert of any iniquity of His own, but by the office of His mercy. For, that you may know the law to be good, which you wished to reproach, the Apostle Paul himself said in a certain place: 'The law entered in, that sin might abound.' Still he seems to reproach it; but hear what follows: 'But where,' he says, 'sin abounded, grace did much more abound.' For the law was given to proud men who attributed everything to their own strength, so that, since they could not fulfill the law that was given, they might be found transgressors, and having become guilty under the law, might beg mercy from the Author of the law.
22:105
proinde paulo post dicit idem apostolus: itaque lex quidem sancta et mandatum sanctum et iustum et bonum. sed ne dicas. quia de alio mandato dicit, ut ostendat, quia de illo dicit, de quo paulo ante dixerat: lex subintrauit, ut abundaret delictum, statim sibi obposuit quaestionem: quod ergo bonum milii factum est mors? absit; sed peccatum, ut adpareat peccatum, per bonum operatum est mihi mortem. erat enim peccatum, sed non adparebat peccatum ; data est lex superbo, fecit contra legem et adparuit peccatum, quod erat, sed non adparebat. adparens autem peccatum humiliauit superbum, humiliatus superbus factus est paenitens, de paenitentia inpetrata est misericordia.
因此,稍後同一位使徒說:「這樣看來,律法是聖潔的,誡命也是聖潔、公義、良善的。」但恐怕你說他是在講另一條誡命,為表明他所講的正是稍前所說的那條——「律法本是外添的,叫過犯顯多」——他立刻向自己提出一個問題:「那麼,那良善的竟成了叫我死的嗎?斷乎不是;乃是罪藉著那良善的叫我死,為要顯出真是罪。」因為罪本是存在的,但罪並未顯明;律法賜給了驕傲人,他違背了律法,那本存在卻未顯明的罪便顯露出來。但罪的顯露使驕傲人謙卑;謙卑了的驕傲人成了悔改的人;從悔改便得了憐憫。
Accordingly, a little later the same Apostle says: 'And so the law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good.' But lest you say that he is speaking of some other commandment, in order to show that he is speaking of that of which he had said shortly before, 'The law entered in that sin might abound,' he at once posed a question to himself: 'Did then that which is good become death to me? God forbid; but sin, that it might appear sin, worked death in me through that which is good.' For there was sin, but sin did not appear; the law was given to the proud man, he acted against the law, and the sin which existed but did not appear became apparent. But sin becoming apparent humbled the proud man; the proud man being humbled became penitent; from penitence mercy was obtained.
22:106
audisti ergo, quod interrogasti, responde, quod interrogo: nihil nocere poterat gens tenebrarum deo? quare huc misit partem suam miscendam et polluendam a natura daemonum ? FEL. dixit: Si in arbitrio nostro sumus, nemo neminem cogat; quando uoluero, ero christianus. uoluntas nobis subiacet aut esse christianum aut non esse. AUG. dixit: Quia uoluntas nobis adiacet. manifestum est et hoc de diuinis scripturis docui; quod coactus est etiam inuitus dicere etiam ille, qui uos in istum induxit errorem. quod autem dicis: nemo cogatur. quando uoluero, ero christianus, nemo te plane cogit; quando uolueris. esto, quia ex uoluntate tua huc uenisti et ex uoluntate tua ista disputasti.
那麼,你已聽見你所問的;如今回答我所問的:黑暗族類能對神毫無傷害嗎?祂為何差祂的一部分到這裡來,被魔鬼的本性所混合、所玷污?費利克斯說:若我們在自己的選擇之中,就不讓任何人強迫任何人;我幾時願意,就幾時作基督徒。作或不作基督徒,是服在我們的意志之下的。奧古斯丁說:既然意志是我們現成可用的,這也是顯明的,我已從神聖的經文中教導過;連那把你引入此謬誤的人,也被迫違心地承認這一點。但至於你所說的——「不讓任何人被強迫;我幾時願意,就幾時作基督徒」——顯然沒有人強迫你;你幾時願意,就任憑你,既然你是憑自己的意志來到這裡,也是憑自己的意志辯論這些事。
You have heard, then, what you asked; now answer what I ask: Could the race of darkness do no harm to God? Why did He send His portion here to be mingled and defiled by the nature of demons? FELIX said: If we are in our own choice, let no one compel anyone; whenever I wish, I shall be a Christian. It lies subject to our will either to be a Christian or not to be. AUGUSTINE said: Since the will lies at hand for us, this too is manifest, and I have taught it from the divine Scriptures; a thing which even he who led you into this error was compelled to say, even against his will. But as to what you say — 'let no one be compelled; whenever I wish, I shall be a Christian' — plainly no one compels you; whenever you wish, so be it, since it was of your own will that you came here and of your own will that you disputed these things.
22:107
et uae uoluntati malae, si mala est; pax bonae uoluntati, si bona est. siue enim mala sit, siue bona sit, uoluntas est. bonam uoluntatem sequitur corona, malam uoluntatem sequitur poena. deus iudex uoluntatum est. creator autem naturarum. si ergo putas cogi te, ut sis christianus, audi a nobis omnino te non cogi. cogita potius, quae audis, perpende, in tua uoluntate es; examina ut prudens, si tamen in te est ulla prudentia uel humana, utrum ea, quae dicta sunt, ueritate fulta sint, utrum tu ipse in Manichaei uestri defensione defeceris, sicut adparet, et quando uolueris, esto quod nondum es, et desine esse quod es. FEL. dixit:
惡的意志有禍了,若它是惡的;善的意志有平安,若它是善的。因為無論它是惡是善,它仍是意志。冠冕隨著善的意志而來,刑罰隨著惡的意志而來。神是眾意志的審判者,卻是眾本性的創造者。因此,你若以為自己被強迫作基督徒,就聽我們說:你絕沒有被強迫。倒要思想你所聽見的,好好衡量;你是在你自己的意志之中。要像個明智人那樣察驗——只要你裡面還有任何明智,哪怕是人的明智——察驗所說的這些話是否有真理支撐,你自己是否在為你的摩尼辯護中失敗了,正如所顯明的;並且你幾時願意,就成為你尚未成為的,並停止作你現今所是的。費利克斯說:
And woe to the evil will, if it is evil; peace to the good will, if it is good. For whether it be evil or good, it is will. A crown follows the good will, punishment follows the evil will. God is the judge of wills, but the Creator of natures. If, therefore, you think you are compelled to be a Christian, hear from us that you are by no means compelled. Rather consider what you hear, weigh it well; you are in your own will. Examine it as a prudent man — if indeed there is in you any prudence, even human — whether the things that have been said are supported by truth, whether you yourself have failed in the defense of your Mani, as appears; and whenever you wish, be what you are not yet, and cease to be what you are. FELIX said:
22:108
Ecce iam compendiue, ut dixit sanctitas tua, ne chartas cumulemus: si tibi placet, quod petiui pridem, huc ueni; ostende mihi ueritatem, ut illud, quod teneo, pareat, quia ueritas non est, et habes me paratum ad credendum. AUG. dixit: Iam quidem quod tenes, satis adparet, quia ueritas non est. absit enim a cordibus ueritatem quaerentium uel tenentium, ut credant deum substantiam suam necessitate coactum mersisse daemonum naturae ligandam atque polluendam; absit a fidelibus credere deum ad liberandam substantiam suam conuertere se in masculos contra feminas et in feminas contra masculos ad eorum concupiscentiam inritandam;
看哪,如今就簡略地說,正如你的聖德所言,免得我們堆積篇幅:若你喜悅——就是我先前所求的——請到這裡來;把真理指示給我,好叫我所持守的被顯明不是真理,那麼我就預備好去相信。奧古斯丁說:確實,你所持守的不是真理,這已足夠明顯了。因為,願尋求或持守真理之人的心,絕不相信神被必要所迫,把祂自己的本體投入魔鬼的本性中受捆綁、受玷污;願忠信之人絕不相信:神為釋放祂自己的本體,把自己變為男性去對抗女性、變為女性去對抗男性,以激起牠們的情慾;
Behold, now briefly, as your Holiness said, lest we heap up pages: if it pleases you — the thing I asked for before — come here; show me the truth, so that what I hold may be shown not to be truth, and you have me ready to believe. AUGUSTINE said: Indeed, that what you hold is not truth is already sufficiently apparent. For far be it from the hearts of those who seek or hold truth to believe that God, compelled by necessity, plunged His own substance into the nature of demons to be bound and defiled; far be it from the faithful to believe that God, to free His own substance, turned Himself into males against females and into females against males, to provoke their lust;
22:109
absit a fidelibus credere deum substantiam suam, quam ipse daemonibus mersit, postea in aeternum damnare. hoc ergo quia ueritas non est, manifestum est. sed quia uis tibi pro ista falsitate expulsa atque conuicta patefieri ueritatem, si quid de cognoscenda fide catholica adhuc mouet, ab initio fidei poteris erudiri. etenim aptum perceptioni ueritatis incommutabilis facit pia fides: a qua fide quisquis incipere noluerit, superbus foris remanebit et ad id, quo tendit uel quo uult peruenire, perduci non poterit. sed quia iam illa falsitas manifesta est, anathema falsitatem, ut possis incipere aptus esse ad cognoscendam ueritatem. FEL. dixit: Cum adparuerit mihi;
願忠信之人絕不相信:神後來竟永遠定祂自己本體的罪,就是祂親自投入魔鬼中的那本體。既然如此,這不是真理,乃是顯明的。但既然你希望,在這已被驅逐、被駁倒的虛假之後,把真理向你敞開,那麼若還有任何關於認識大公信仰的事觸動你,你便可從信仰的起點受教導。因為敬虔的信仰使人適於領悟那不變的真理;凡不肯從這信仰起步的人,必因驕傲留在外面,也不能被引到他所追求、或所願達到的目標。但既然那虛假如今已顯明,就咒詛這虛假,好叫你能開始適於認識真理。費利克斯說:當它向我顯明時;
far be it from the faithful to believe that God afterward damns forever His own substance, which He Himself plunged into the demons. Because this, then, is not truth, it is manifest. But since you wish the truth to be laid open to you in place of this falsehood, now expelled and refuted, if anything concerning the knowledge of the catholic faith still moves you, you can be instructed from the beginning of faith. For pious faith makes one fit for the perception of unchangeable truth; and whoever is unwilling to begin from this faith will remain outside in his pride, and cannot be led to that toward which he strives or wishes to arrive. But since that falsehood is now manifest, anathematize the falsehood, so that you may begin to be fit for knowing the truth. FELIX said: When it becomes apparent to me;
22:110
quia mihi non adparet, quia altera mihi non ostensa est, non possum anathemare. AUG. dixit: Anathemandus est error, qui dicit corruptibilem deum, an non est anathemandus ? FEL. dixit: Iterum dic. AUG. dixit: Anathemandus est error, qui dicit corruptibilem deum, an non est anathemandus ? FEL. dixit: Quaeratur, si dicit. AUG. dixit: Ego hoc interrogaui: qui dicit corruptibilem deum, anathemandus est, an non ? FEL. dixit: Qui dicit corruptibilem deum, anathemandus est . hoc mihi obicis? AUG. dixit: Hoc interrogo. FEL. dixit: Corruptibilem deum dicis, non autem quod primo dixisti, quia partem suam dedit aduersariis ? AUG. dixit: Interim quod interrogo responde:
既然它未向我顯明,既然那另一者未曾指示給我,我就不能咒詛。奧古斯丁說:那說神是可朽壞的謬誤,該被咒詛,還是不該被咒詛?費利克斯說:再說一遍。奧古斯丁說:那說神是可朽壞的謬誤,該被咒詛,還是不該被咒詛?費利克斯說:要查究他是否這樣說。奧古斯丁說:我問的是:凡說神是可朽壞的人,該被咒詛,還是不該?費利克斯說:凡說神是可朽壞的人,該被咒詛。你把這事扣在我身上嗎?奧古斯丁說:我問的正是這個。費利克斯說:你說神是可朽壞的——卻不是你起初所說的、祂把自己的一部分交給了敵對者嗎?奧古斯丁說:暫且先回答我所問的:
since it is not apparent to me, since the other has not been shown to me, I cannot anathematize. AUGUSTINE said: Is the error to be anathematized which says that God is corruptible, or is it not to be anathematized? FELIX said: Say it again. AUGUSTINE said: Is the error to be anathematized which says that God is corruptible, or is it not to be anathematized? FELIX said: Let it be inquired whether he says so. AUGUSTINE said: I asked this: whoever says that God is corruptible, is he to be anathematized, or not? FELIX said: Whoever says that God is corruptible is to be anathematized. Do you cast this at me? AUGUSTINE said: This I ask. FELIX said: You say that God is corruptible — not, however, what you first said, that He gave His portion to the adversaries? AUGUSTINE said: For the meantime, answer what I ask:
22:111
qui dicit corruptibilem deum esse, anathemandus est, an non? FEL. dixit: Ualde. AUG. dixit: Qui dicit corruptibilem esse naturam et substantiam dei, anathemandus est, an non ? FEL. dixit: Non intellexi, quod dixisti. AUG. dixit: Hoc dico, quod omnis homo intellegit, qui non se fingit non intellegere: naturam et substantiam dei, id est illud ipsum, quicquid est deus, qui dicit corruptibilem esse, anathemandus est, an non ? FEL. dixit: Etiam anathemandus est. si probatum fuerit esse uerum. AUG. dixit: Nondum tibi dixi. quia Manichaeus dicit corruptibilem naturam dei: sed hoc tibi dixi, quia quicumque hoc dicit, anathemandus est FEL. dixit: Et ego respondi: etiam. AUG. dixit:
凡說神是可朽壞的人,該被咒詛,還是不該?費利克斯說:非常該。奧古斯丁說:凡說神的本性與本體是可朽壞的人,該被咒詛,還是不該?費利克斯說:我沒明白你所說的。奧古斯丁說:我說的是這個,凡不假裝不明白的人都明白的:凡說神的本性與本體——也就是神所是的那一切,無論神是什麼——是可朽壞的人,該被咒詛,還是不該?費利克斯說:他也該被咒詛,若這被證實為真的話。奧古斯丁說:我還沒有對你說摩尼說神的本性是可朽壞的;我對你說的是:凡說這話的人都該被咒詛。費利克斯說:我也回答了:是的,他也該。奧古斯丁說:
Whoever says that God is corruptible, is he to be anathematized, or not? FELIX said: Very much so. AUGUSTINE said: Whoever says that the nature and substance of God is corruptible, is he to be anathematized, or not? FELIX said: I did not understand what you said. AUGUSTINE said: I say this, which every man understands who does not pretend not to understand: whoever says that the nature and substance of God — that is, that very thing, whatever God is — is corruptible, is he to be anathematized, or not? FELIX said: He too is to be anathematized, if it shall have been proved to be true. AUGUSTINE said: I have not yet told you that Mani says the nature of God is corruptible; but I told you this, that whoever says this is to be anathematized. FELIX said: And I answered: yes, he too. AUGUSTINE said:
22:112
Pars illa, quae mixta est genti tenebrarum, de dei natura est, an de alia aliqua natura? FEL. dixit: De dei. AUG. dixit: Quod de dei natura est, hoc est, quod deus est, an aliud quid. quod non est deus? FEL dixit: Ita est . quod de deo est. deus est, secundum quod et scriptum est: lux lucet in tenebris et tenebrae eam non conprehenderunt; deus enim lumen est et tenebrae in eo non sunt. AUG. dixit: Bene respondisti, quia et quicquid de dei natura est, deus est et deus lux est et tenebrae in eo non sunt; et talis lux luxit in tenebris et tenebrae eam non conprehenderunt.
那與黑暗族類混合的一部分——它是屬神的本性,還是屬某個別的本性?費利克斯說:屬神的。奧古斯丁說:那屬神本性的——它是神所是的那位,還是別的什麼、不是神的?費利克斯說:正是如此:那屬神的就是神,正如經上也記著:「光照在黑暗裡,黑暗卻不接受光」;因為「神就是光,在祂毫無黑暗。」奧古斯丁說:你回答得好,凡屬神本性的就是神,神就是光,在祂毫無黑暗;並且這樣的光照在黑暗裡,黑暗卻不接受它。
That portion which was mingled with the race of darkness — is it of the nature of God, or of some other nature? FELIX said: Of God. AUGUSTINE said: That which is of the nature of God — is it that which God is, or something else which is not God? FELIX said: So it is: that which is of God is God, according as it is also written: 'The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it'; for 'God is light, and in Him is no darkness.' AUGUSTINE said: You have answered well, that whatever is of the nature of God is God, and God is light, and in Him is no darkness; and such a light shone in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
22:113
uideamus ergo, utrum Manichaeus partem dei non dicat conprehensam a tenebris, non etiam teneri ligatam, non etiam maculatam et pollutam, sic ut indigeat misericordia liberatoris et purgatoris. si autem haec dicit, secundum te etiam et secundum ueras confessiones tuas anathemandus est, quia partem dei et naturam dei, quod est ipse deus, dicit conprehensam a tenebris et ligatam et pollutam : quod tu ipse secundum euangelium loquens non potuisti dicere ; sed uerum dixisti, quia lux lucet in tenebris et tenebrae eam non conprehenderunt. Manichaeus ergo anathemandus, qui dixit, quia lux tenebrata est in tenebris et tenebrae eam conprehenderunt,. FEL. dixit:
那麼,讓我們看看摩尼是否說神的一部分被黑暗所擄獲,甚至被拘綁,甚至被沾染、被玷污,以致需要一位釋放者與潔淨者的憐憫。但若他說這些,那麼按你、也按你真實的承認,他該被咒詛,因為他說神的一部分、神的本性——就是神自己——被黑暗所擄獲、被捆綁、被玷污——這正是你自己按福音說話時所無法說的;反倒你說了真話:光照在黑暗裡,黑暗卻不接受它。所以摩尼該被咒詛,因為他說光在黑暗中被黑暗化了,黑暗擄獲了它。費利克斯說:
Let us see, then, whether Mani does not say that a portion of God was comprehended by the darkness, and even held bound, and even stained and defiled, so as to need the mercy of a liberator and purger. But if he says these things, then according to you and according to your true confessions he is to be anathematized, because he says that a portion of God and the nature of God, which is God Himself, was comprehended by the darkness and bound and defiled — a thing which you yourself, speaking according to the Gospel, could not say; but you spoke truly, that the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. Mani, therefore, is to be anathematized, who said that the light was darkened in the darkness and the darkness comprehended it. FELIX said:
22:114
Sed et qui polluitur et qui tenetur, liberatur; et nos si polluti sumus, mundamur. AUG. dixit: Sed hoc de dei natura non recte dicitur. sed de illa, quae pollui potest, recte dicitur, quia polluitur et mundatur; de illa uero, quae pollui non potest, uides cum quanto sacrilegio dicatur polluitur et mundatur\', maxime quia sic dicitis quandam dei partem esse pollutam, ut propterea ligetur in aeternum globo tenebrarum, quia non potuit mundari. hoc qui non anathemat, falsum paulo ante respondit, quia omnis, qui dicit corruptibilem deum, anathemandus est. FEL. dixit: Hoc, quod dixit sanctitas tua, quia pars, quae se non mundauit ab coinquinatione gentis tenebrarum .
但那被玷污的和那被拘的,都得釋放;我們若被玷污,也得潔淨。奧古斯丁說:但這話用在神的本性上是不對的。用在那能被玷污的東西上,說它被玷污又被潔淨,是對的;但用在那不能被玷污的東西上,你看看以何等重大的褻瀆說它被玷污又被潔淨——尤其因為你如此說神的某一部分被玷污,以致因此永遠被捆綁在黑暗的團塊中,因為它無法被潔淨。凡不咒詛這事的人,方才就答錯了,因他說凡說神可朽壞的人都該被咒詛。費利克斯說:你的聖德所說的這話,就是那沒有洗淨自己脫離黑暗族類污穢的那一部分……
But both he who is defiled and he who is held is set free; and we too, if we are defiled, are cleansed. AUGUSTINE said: But this is not rightly said of the nature of God. Of that which can be defiled, it is rightly said that it is defiled and cleansed; but of that which cannot be defiled, you see with how great a sacrilege it is said that it is defiled and cleansed — especially because you say in this way that a certain portion of God is defiled, so that on that account it is bound forever in the mass of darkness, because it could not be cleansed. Whoever does not anathematize this answered falsely a little while ago, that everyone who says God is corruptible is to be anathematized. FELIX said: This which your Holiness said, that the portion which did not cleanse itself from the contamination of the race of darkness…
22:115
et sic dicit Manichaeus, quia non sunt missi in regnum dei. hoc enim adseris tu, quia damnati sunt; sed Manichaeus hoc dicit, quia non damnati sunt, sed ad custodiam positi sunt illius gentis tenebrarum. - AUG. dixit: De ista parte tecum ago, quam dicis pollutam purgari: postea, si opus fuerit, de illa, quae figitur in globo eius. interim quae purgatur, polluta erat. FEL. dixit: Quae polluitur, et mundatur. AUG. dixit: Qui ergo dicit naturam dei et substantiam dei et id quod deus est, posse pollui, ligari, inquinari a gente tenebrarum, non est anathemandus ? FEL. dixit: Christus unde nos mundauit ? unde nos liberauit ? AUG. dixit:
摩尼因此說,它們並未被送入神的國。因為你斷言這事,說它們被定了罪;但摩尼說這事,說它們並未被定罪,而是被安置為看守那黑暗族類的。奧古斯丁說:關於那一部分我與你論究,就是你所說被玷污後又被潔淨的那部分:以後若有必要,再論那被固定在他團塊中的部分。眼下,那被潔淨的曾是被玷污的。費利克斯說:那被玷污的,也被潔淨。奧古斯丁說:那麼,凡說神的本性、神的本體、以及神所是的那位,能被黑暗族類所玷污、捆綁、污穢的人——豈不該被咒詛嗎?費利克斯說:基督從何處潔淨了我們?從何處釋放了我們?奧古斯丁說:
and thus Mani says that they are not sent into the kingdom of God. For you assert this, that they are damned; but Mani says this, that they are not damned, but are placed as a guard over that race of darkness. AUGUSTINE said: About that portion I deal with you, which you say, being defiled, is purged: afterward, if it be necessary, about that which is fixed in his mass. Meanwhile, that which is purged was defiled. FELIX said: That which is defiled is also cleansed. AUGUSTINE said: Whoever, then, says that the nature of God and the substance of God and that which God is can be defiled, bound, polluted by the race of darkness — is he not to be anathematized? FELIX said: Whence did Christ cleanse us? Whence did He free us? AUGUSTINE said:
22:116
Christus non partem dei, non naturam dei liberauit, sed facturam, quam fecit, in peccatum cadentem per liberum arbitrium sua misericordia liberauit. eam rem mundauit, quae pollui poterat, eam rem liberauit, quae captiuari poterat, eam rem sanauit, quae infirmari poterat. modo autem de deo, de natura dei, de substantia dei, de eo, quod deus est, loquimur . poterat pollui, an non poterat? FEL. dixit: Anima nostra ex deo est. quae polluta est? si non est ei deo, utquid pro illa Christus crucifixus est ? si ergo paret, quia Christus propter animam nostram crucifixus est, paret, quia ex deo est et polluta erat et ipse eam mundauit. AUG. dixit:
基督所釋放的並非神的一部分,並非神的本性,而是祂所造、藉自由意志陷入罪中的受造物——祂憑祂的憐憫釋放了它。祂潔淨那能被玷污之物,祂釋放那能被擄之物,祂醫治那能變軟弱之物。但如今我們所論的是神、神的本性、神的本體、以及神所是的那位:它能被玷污,還是不能?費利克斯說:我們的靈魂是從神而出的。豈不是它被玷污了嗎?若它不是從神而出的,基督為何為它被釘十字架?因此,若顯明基督是為我們的靈魂被釘十字架,就顯明它是從神而出的、曾被玷污、並且祂潔淨了它。奧古斯丁說:
Christ freed not a portion of God, not the nature of God, but the creature which He made, falling into sin through free will — He freed it by His mercy. He cleansed that thing which could be defiled, He freed that thing which could be taken captive, He healed that thing which could be made infirm. But now we are speaking of God, of the nature of God, of the substance of God, of that which God is: could it be defiled, or could it not? FELIX said: Our soul is from God. Is it that which was defiled? If it is not from God, why was Christ crucified for it? If, therefore, it is evident that Christ was crucified for the sake of our soul, it is evident that it is from God and was defiled and He cleansed it. AUGUSTINE said:
22:117
Ego non solum animam, sed et corpus nostrum et omnem creaturam et spiritalem et corporalem ex deo dico esse, quia hoc habet catholica fides. sed aliud est, quod de se deus genuit, quod hoc est, quod ipse; aliud autem, quod fecit deus. quod deus genuit, aequale est patri; quod deus fecit. non est aequale conditum conditori. aliud autem dicimus ex deo esse, quod melius dicitur de deo esse, quia hoc est, quod ipse, sicut unigenitus filius, sicut uerbum eius, per quod facta sunt omnia: alia uero sic dicimus ex deo, quia dixit, et facta sunt; mandauit, et constituta sunt\'. hinc est anima, ex his, quae fecit deus, non illud, quod de se genuit deus.
我說,不但靈魂,連我們的身體、以及一切受造物,無論屬靈的還是屬物質的,都是從神而出的,因為大公信仰持守這一點。但神從自己所生的是一回事,那就是祂自己所是的;神所造的又是另一回事。神所生的與父同等;神所造的——受造之物與創造者並不同等。但我們說,有一種東西是從神而出,以致更該說是「屬神的」,因為它就是祂自己所是的,如那獨生子,如祂的道,萬物是藉祂而造的;而另一種東西我們如此說是從神而出,因為「祂說有,就有;命立,就立。」靈魂即由此而來,屬於神所造之物,而非神從自己所生之物。
I say that not only the soul, but also our body and every creature, both spiritual and corporeal, is from God, because this the catholic faith holds. But one thing is what God begot of Himself, which is that which He Himself is; another thing is what God made. What God begot is equal to the Father; what God made — the thing created is not equal to the Creator. But we say that one thing is from God in such a way that it is better said to be of God, because it is that which He Himself is, as the only-begotten Son, as His Word, through whom all things were made; while other things we say to be from God in this way, because 'He spoke, and they were made; He commanded, and they were created.' Hence is the soul, from among the things which God made, not that which God begot of Himself.
22:118
ideo uerbum, quod de se genuit, pollui non potuit nec potest nec poterit. anima uero, quam fecit rectricem corporis, ut seruiret superiori, dominaretur inferiori, id est seruiret deo,^ dominaretur corpori, contempta dei lege per peccatum polluta est; deus autem misericordiam praestans his, quae fecit, misit filium, per quem fecit, et per illum refecit. quando condendum erat, quod non erat, per uerbum conditum est; quando reficiendum erat, quod deprauatum factum fuerat, suscepta est inde creatura de uirgine Maria, ut per id, quod erat homo, demonstraretur homini, et quid sustinendum et quid sperandum esset.
因此,祂從自己所生的道,過去不能、現在不能、將來也不能被玷污。但靈魂,祂造它作身體的統治者,使它服事在上的、管轄在下的——就是服事神、管轄身體——它藐視了神的律法,便藉罪被玷污了。然而神向祂所造之物施憐憫,差來祂的兒子,就是祂藉以造萬物的,並藉祂重造了它們。當那本不存在的須被創造時,它是藉道被造的;當那已被造、又被敗壞的須被重造時,一個受造物便由此從童貞女馬利亞被取來,好叫藉著那作為人的,向人顯明何當忍受、何當盼望。
Therefore the Word, which He begot of Himself, could not, cannot, and will not be able to be defiled. But the soul, which He made as ruler of the body, that it should serve the higher and rule the lower — that is, serve God and rule the body — having despised the law of God, was defiled through sin. But God, showing mercy to the things He made, sent His Son, through whom He made them, and through Him remade them. When that which was not had to be created, it was created through the Word; when that which had been made and corrupted had to be remade, a creature was taken up from thence from the Virgin Mary, so that through that which was man, it might be shown to man both what must be endured and what must be hoped for.
22:119
itaque natura uerbi, substantia unigeniti filii dei nihil passa est uel a persecutoribus Iudaeis uel a diabolo angelo malo persequente. sed quia induit se carne, induit se re mortali, re passibili, re mutabili: in eo quod se induit, passus est quicquid uoluit ad exemplum patientiae, et reformauit hoc ad exemplum iustitiae. tu modo dic mihi de dei parte, quod deus est, utrum pollui possit, an non. si potest, non est incommutabilis deus, et qui hoc dicit, anathemandus est . si autem non potest, uides anathemandum Manichaeum esse, qui dicit partem dei, naturam dei, id quod est deus, uenisse huc puram ad gentem tenebrarum ligatam atque pollutam, ut indigeat solui et mundari. FEL. dixit:
如此,道的本性、神獨生子的本體,無論從逼迫祂的猶太人,還是從那逼迫祂的惡天使魔鬼,都未受任何苦。但因祂用肉身披上自己,就披上了一個必死之物、可受苦之物、可變之物:在祂所披上的那物中,祂隨己意受了一切苦,作為忍耐的榜樣,又把這改造為公義的榜樣。如今你告訴我,關於神的那一部分、就是神所是的,它能被玷污,還是不能。若能,神就不是不變的,凡說這話的人都該被咒詛。但若不能,你就看見摩尼該被咒詛,因他說神的一部分、神的本性、就是神所是的,純潔地來到這裡、來到黑暗族類中,被捆綁、被玷污,以致需要被鬆開、被潔淨。費利克斯說:
And so the nature of the Word, the substance of the only-begotten Son of God, suffered nothing either from the persecuting Jews or from the devil, the evil angel who persecuted Him. But because He clothed Himself with flesh, He clothed Himself with a mortal thing, a passible thing, a mutable thing: in that which He put on, He suffered whatever He willed, as an example of patience, and reformed this as an example of righteousness. Now do you tell me concerning the portion of God, that which God is, whether it can be defiled, or not. If it can, God is not immutable, and whoever says this is to be anathematized. But if it cannot, you see that Mani is to be anathematized, who says that a portion of God, the nature of God, that which is God, came here pure to the race of darkness, bound and defiled, so as to need to be loosed and cleansed. FELIX said:
22:120
Hoc tu dixisti de anima, quia ex deo non est? AUG. dixit: Non dixi; sed dixi, quia ex deo est, tamquam a deo facta, non tamquam de deo nata. FEL. dixit: Dixisti de anima, quia non est ex deo, sed factura dei, quia sine deo nihil est; hoc enim dicis tu et non uis adseuerare, quia ex deo est anima. AUG. dixit: A deo est, sed facta a deo. FEL. dixit: Aut facta aut missa aut data, ex deo est. ergo si ex deo est et polluta est et uenit Christus liberare eam de pollutione, quid culpas Manichaeum ? AUG. dixit: Quia ego dico animam non naturam dei, sed factam a deo per liberum arbitrium peccasse et peccato esse pollutam et per dei misericordiam in paenitentia liberatam; tu autem ipsam naturam dei.
你是這樣說靈魂的嗎,說它不是從神而出的?奧古斯丁說:我沒有這樣說;我說的是它從神而出,是被神所造,而非從神所生。費利克斯說:你論靈魂說它不是從神而出,而是神的受造物,因為沒有神它便是無有;你說的正是這個,卻不肯斷言靈魂是從神而出的。奧古斯丁說:它是從神而來的,但是被神所造的。費利克斯說:無論是被造、被差、還是被賜,它都是從神而出的。因此,若它是從神而出、又被玷污,基督又來釋放它脫離玷污,你為何責備摩尼?奧古斯丁說:因為我說靈魂不是神的本性,而是被神所造,並藉自由意志犯了罪、被罪玷污,又藉神的憐憫在悔改中得釋放;而你卻說它就是神的本性……
Did you say this about the soul, that it is not from God? AUGUSTINE said: I did not say it; but I said that it is from God, as made by God, not as born of God. FELIX said: You said about the soul that it is not from God, but a creature of God, since without God it is nothing; for this you say and are unwilling to affirm that the soul is from God. AUGUSTINE said: It is from God, but made by God. FELIX said: Whether made or sent or given, it is from God. Therefore, if it is from God and was defiled, and Christ came to free it from defilement, why do you blame Mani? AUGUSTINE said: Because I say that the soul is not the nature of God, but made by God, and that it sinned through free will and was defiled by sin and through God's mercy was freed in penitence; but you say that it is the very nature of God…
22:121
quod deus est, deum de deo dicis in gente tenebrarum captum atque pollutum . et multum interest inter id, quod de se deus genuit et quod fecit non de se, sed ex nihilo, id est cum omnino non esset, a deo accepit, ut esset, id est ut institueretur. FEL dixit: Ergo pars dei est. AUG. dixit: Iam tibi dictum est, non est pars dei; et accipe, quomodo intellegas deum omnipotentem factorem. omnia, quae fiunt et quod quisque facit, aut de se est aut ex aliquo aut ei nihilo. homo quia non est omnipotens, de se filium facit, ex aliquo, sicut artifex ex ligno arcam, ex argento uasculum. potuit enim facere uasculum, sed non potuit facere argentum; potuit facere arcam, sed non potuit facere lignum.
——就是神所是的;你說「出於神的神」在黑暗族類中被擄獲、被玷污。神從自己所生的、與祂所造的(不是出於自己,而是出於無有——就是它全然不存在時,從神領受了「存在」,也就是被設立)二者之間,有極大的分別。費利克斯說:那麼它就是神的一部分。奧古斯丁說:已經對你說過了:它不是神的一部分;且領受你當如何理解那全能的創造者神。凡被造之物、凡任何人所造的,或是出於自己,或是出於某物,或是出於無有。人因不是全能的,就從自己生子,又出於某物而造——如工匠用木頭造箱、用銀子造小器皿。因為他能造那器皿,卻不能造銀子;他能造那箱子,卻不能造木頭。
— that which God is; you say that God-from-God was captured and defiled in the race of darkness. And there is a great difference between that which God begot of Himself and that which He made not of Himself, but out of nothing — that is, when it was not at all, it received from God that it should be, that is, that it should be established. FELIX said: Therefore it is a portion of God. AUGUSTINE said: It has already been told you: it is not a portion of God; and receive how you may understand God the omnipotent maker. All things that are made, and whatever anyone makes, are either of himself, or out of something, or out of nothing. Man, because he is not omnipotent, makes a son of himself, and makes out of something — as the craftsman a chest out of wood, a little vessel out of silver. For he could make the vessel, but he could not make the silver; he could make the chest, but he could not make the wood.
22:122
ex nihilo autem, ex eo, quod prorsus non est, facere ut sit, nullus hominum potest. deus autem quia omnipotens est, et de se filium genuit et ex nihilo mundum fecit et ex limo hominem formauit, ut per istas tres potentias ostenderet effectionem suam in omnibus ualentem. quia de se quod fecit, nec fecisse dicendus est, sed genuisse. quod autem ex aliquo, sicut de terra hominem, non sic fecit hominem de terra, ut alius ei fecerit ipsam terram, unde faceret hominem. quomodo fecit deus argentum argentario, unde faciat uasculum; sed ipse fecit et, quod non erat, ut esset, et quod inde rursus esset, quod iam ipse ex nihilo creauerat, ut esset.
但出於無有——出於那全然不存在之物——使某物存在,這是無人能做的。然而神,因祂是全能的,既從自己生了子,又出於無有造了世界,又用泥造了人,好叫祂藉這三種能力顯明祂的效能在萬物上得勝。因為祂出於自己所作的,不當說是「造」,而當說是「生」。至於祂出於某物所作的——如出於地造人——祂造人出於地,並非像是另有一位為祂造了那地本身、使祂可用來造人,如神為銀匠造了銀子、供他造小器皿一般;倒是祂自己既造了那本不存在的、使它存在,又造了那由此而出之物,就是祂自己早已從無有所造、使之存在的。
But out of nothing — out of that which utterly is not — to make something be, no man can. But God, because He is omnipotent, both begot a Son of Himself, and made the world out of nothing, and formed man out of the clay, so that through these three powers He might show His efficacy prevailing over all things. For what He made of Himself is not to be said to have been made, but begotten. But what He made out of something — as man out of earth — He did not make man out of earth in such a way that another had made for Him the earth itself out of which He might make man, as God made silver for the silversmith out of which to make a little vessel; rather He Himself made both that which was not, that it should be, and that which should thence exist, which He had already Himself created out of nothing, that it should be.
22:123
sic ergo corpus, sic anima, sic intellegitur uniuersa creatura facta a deo, non genita de deo, ut hoc sit, quod deus. proinde modo forte eliges, quid teneas et quid respuas. elige, quid sit melius. quoniam uidemus multa mutabilia et ipsa tamen bona quamuis mutabilia, multa mortalia et ipsa tamen bona quamuis mortalia, bonum autem incommutabile omnino ipse deus est, quid melius sit tibi tenere elige: deum mutabilem esse, an quod deus fecit esse mutabile, quia necesse est, ut unum de duobus dicas. si nolueris admittere id, quod fecit deus, esse mutabile, restat, ut dicas ipsum deum esse mutabilem. ut .
如此,身體是這樣,靈魂是這樣,整個受造界都當如此被理解為由神所造,而非從神所生,以致成為神所是的。因此,如今你或許要選擇持守什麼、棄絕什麼。選那更好的吧。既然我們看見許多可變之物,卻仍是善的、儘管可變,許多必死之物,卻仍是善的、儘管必死,而那不變的善全然就是神自己——那麼你就選擇,於你更好的是持守哪一項:神是可變的,還是神所造的是可變的;因為你必須在二者中說一項。你若不肯承認神所造的是可變的,就只剩下你說神自己是可變的了。
Thus, then, is the body, thus the soul, thus is understood the whole creation to be made by God, not begotten of God, so as to be that which God is. Accordingly, now perhaps you will choose what to hold and what to reject. Choose what is better. Since we see many mutable things, and yet these good although mutable, many mortal things, and yet these good although mortal, but the unchangeable good is altogether God Himself — choose which it is better for you to hold: that God is mutable, or that what God made is mutable; for it is necessary that you say one of the two. If you will not admit that what God made is mutable, it remains that you say that God Himself is mutable.
22:124
autem ab hoc sacrilegio te purges et ab hac blasphemia, ne dicas substantiam dei esse mutabilem, quare non concedis deum, qui uere est et incommutabilis est, quia ipse etiam dixit: ego sum qui sum, fecisse omnia bona, sed non sibi paria? proinde quia incommutabilis ipse est, non est mirum, si quod fecit, quia ei aequale non est, non est incommutabile, sed mutabile. ideo et per liberum arbitrium peccare et pollui potuit et per eius misericordiam liberari. FEL. dixit: Dixisti hominem fecisse sibi filium; nihil. interest inter patrem et filium. quia hoc ergo protulit sanctitas tua, et ego respondeo, quia deus et quae facit aequalia sunt sibi. AUG. dixit:
但為叫你洗淨自己脫離這褻瀆與這謗讟,免得你說神的本體是可變的,你為何不承認:那真正存在、不變的神——既然祂自己也說了「我是自有永有的」——造了萬物都是好的,卻不與祂自己同等呢?因此,既然祂自己是不變的,那麼祂所造的,因不與祂同等,而不是不變的、乃是可變的,這就不足為奇。所以它也能藉自由意志犯罪、被玷污,並藉祂的憐憫得釋放。費利克斯說:你說人為自己生子;父與子之間並無分別。既然你的聖德提出了這一點,我也回答:神與祂所造的,都與祂同等。奧古斯丁說:
But that you may purge yourself of this sacrilege and of this blasphemy, lest you say that the substance of God is mutable, why do you not grant that God, who truly is and is unchangeable — since He Himself also said, 'I am who I am' — made all things good, but not equal to Himself? Accordingly, since He Himself is unchangeable, it is no wonder if what He made, because it is not equal to Him, is not unchangeable, but mutable. Therefore also through free will it could sin and be defiled, and through His mercy be freed. FELIX said: You said that a man makes a son for himself; there is no difference between father and son. Since, therefore, your Holiness has put this forward, I too answer, that God and the things He makes are equal to Him. AUGUSTINE said:
22:125
Quod intellegere noluisti, quia homo, cum filium facit, non facere proprie dicitur, sed proprie generare dicitur, sic et deus unicum filium genuit\' dixi tibi, non fecit. fecit autem illud, quod aequale ei non est; quod autem genuit, aequale illi est. itaque elige tibi, utrum uelis dicere mutabilem dei facturam, an mutabilem dei naturam. FEL. dixit: Quomodo deus inmutabilis est, similiter, quem genuit, inmutabilis est, et quod fecit, si de ipsius natura est, non mutatur. AUG. dixit: Sed iam tibi dictum est, quia quod fecit, non de ipsius natura est, sed ex nihilo fecit, quia omnipotens est. non erat, et fecit, non de se, non de aliqua re, quam ipse non fecerat, sed ex nihilo. FEL. dixit:
你先前不肯理解的——即人在生子時,不當本義地說是「造」,而當本義地說是「生」——照樣,神生了那獨生子;我告訴過你,祂不是造他。但祂造了那不與祂同等的;至於祂所生的,卻與祂同等。因此你為自己選擇,你寧願說哪一項:神的受造物是可變的,還是神的本性是可變的。費利克斯說:正如神是不變的,照樣祂所生的也是不變的;而祂所造的,若是出於祂自己的本性,就不改變。奧古斯丁說:但已經對你說過了:祂所造的不是出於祂自己的本性,而是祂出於無有而造,因祂是全能的。它本不存在,祂就造了它,不是出於自己,不是出於任何祂自己未曾造的東西,而是出於無有。費利克斯說:
What you were unwilling to understand — that a man, when he makes a son, is not properly said to make, but properly said to generate — so also God begot the only Son; I told you, He did not make him. But He made that which is not equal to Him; whereas what He begot is equal to Him. Therefore choose for yourself which you would rather say: that the creature of God is mutable, or that the nature of God is mutable. FELIX said: As God is immutable, likewise He whom He begot is immutable; and what He made, if it is of His own nature, is not changed. AUGUSTINE said: But it has already been told you that what He made is not of His own nature, but He made it out of nothing, because He is omnipotent. It was not, and He made it — not of Himself, not of any thing which He Himself had not made, but out of nothing. FELIX said:
22:126
Ego non hoc dixi, sed dixi: quia deus inmutabilis est, et quod genuit inmutabile est, et quod fecit inmutabile est. non dixi, unde illud fecit; non hoc quaesiui, unde fecerit. AUG. dixit: Sed a me audisti, quod non quaesisti, ut iam desineres stulta loqui. omnipotens deus et de se potuit generare et de nihilo facere et ex eo, quod iam fecerat, aliquid formare: de se filium aequalem sibi; de nihilo mundum et uniuersam creaturam; ex aliquo de terra hominem, quia omnipotens est. quod ergo de se ipso est, pollui numquam potest quomodo ipse;
我沒有這樣說,我說的是:既然神是不變的,那麼祂所生的也是不變的,祂所造的也是不變的。我沒有說祂出於什麼造它;我沒有問這個,就是祂可能出於什麼造它。奧古斯丁說:但你從我這裡聽見了你未曾問的,好叫你如今可以停止說愚昧話。全能的神既能從自己生,又能出於無有造,又能出於祂已造之物塑成某物:從自己生一位與自己同等的子;出於無有造世界與整個受造界;出於某物,用地造人,因祂是全能的。因此,那出於祂自己的,永不能被玷污,正如祂自己一樣;
I did not say this, but I said: since God is immutable, both that which He begot is immutable, and that which He made is immutable. I did not say out of what He made it; I did not ask this, out of what He may have made it. AUGUSTINE said: But you heard from me what you did not ask, so that you might now cease to speak foolishly. The omnipotent God was able both to generate of Himself, and to make out of nothing, and to form something out of that which He had already made: of Himself a Son equal to Himself; out of nothing the world and the whole creation; out of something, man from earth, because He is omnipotent. That, therefore, which is of Himself can never be defiled, just as He Himself;
22:127
quod autem ab illo factum est, non de illo, et pollui potest per liberum arbitrium et mundari per ipsius misericordiam condemnando, quod peccauit, et agnoscendo, qui eum creauit. tu uero, qui paulo ante dixisti, quia qui dei partem corruptibilem et contaminabilem dicit, anathemandus est, negare autem non potes Manichaeum dixisse, quod pars dei in gente tenebrarum conprehensa atque polluta est, et his eum uerbis blasphemasse adparet. ita ut peius blasphemare forte non posset, aut anathema illum talia dicentem, aut tu cum illo anathemandus es et abiciendus. FEL. dixit: Manichaeus dicit, quia polluta est pars dei; et Christus dicit. quia polluta est anima, et uenit liberare illam de pollutione.
但那由祂所造、卻非出於祂本體的,既能藉自由意志被玷污,也能藉祂的憐憫得潔淨——就是譴責那犯了罪的,並承認那創造它的。可是你,方才既說凡稱神有可朽壞、可玷污之部分者當被咒詛,你就不能否認摩尼曾說神的一部分在黑暗族類中被擄獲並被玷污;由這些話顯然可見他是褻瀆了神——其嚴重程度,或許再無更甚的褻瀆了。你若非咒詛他說這等話,就當與他一同被咒詛、被棄絕。斐理斯說:摩尼說神的一部分被玷污了;而基督說靈魂被玷污了,並且祂來要救它脫離玷污。
But that which was made by him, and not out of him, can both be defiled through free will and be cleansed through his mercy—by condemning that which has sinned and acknowledging him who created it. You, however, who said a little earlier that whoever calls a part of God corruptible and defilable must be anathematized, cannot deny that Mani said that a part of God was seized and defiled among the race of darkness; and it is plain that by these words he blasphemed—so gravely, indeed, that he could perhaps not have blasphemed worse. Either anathematize him for saying such things, or you must be anathematized and cast out together with him. FELIX said: Mani says that a part of God has been defiled; and Christ says that the soul has been defiled, and that he came to set it free from defilement.
22:128
AUG. dixit: Sed anima non est pars dei. nam tu iam confessus es, quia Manichaeus dixit pollutam partem dei; nos autem pollutam dicimus animam ex uoluntate peccati; non esse autem animam partem dei, non de deo genitam, sed a deo factam. sic ergo dicitur anima ex deo, quomodo dicitur aliquod opus fabri ex artificio eius uel ex ipso factum, non tamen de ipso genitum. sicut filius eius. tu ergo quia iam confessus es Manichaeum dixisse pollui partem dei et iamdudum dixisti anathemandum, qui dicit corruptibilem uel contaminabilem deum uel naturam eius, iam anathemasti, quod non uis fateri. hoc enim, quod dixisti.
奧古斯丁說:可是靈魂並非神的一部分。因為你如今已承認摩尼說神的一部分被玷污了;而我們則說,靈魂是因犯罪的意志而被玷污,靈魂並非神的一部分,並非由神所生,乃是神所造。故此,說靈魂「出於神」,正如說工匠的某件作品出於他的技藝、或由他所造,卻非由他本體所生,不像他的兒子那樣。因此,你既已承認摩尼說神的一部分被玷污,且早先又說凡稱神或神的本性為可朽壞、可玷污者當被咒詛,你便已作出你所不願承認的咒詛了。因為你所說的話——
AUGUSTINE said: But the soul is not a part of God. For you have now already confessed that Mani said a part of God was defiled; we, however, say that the soul is defiled by the will to sin, and that the soul is not a part of God, not begotten of God, but made by God. Thus, then, the soul is said to be 'from God' in the way that some work of a craftsman is said to be from his skill, or made by him, yet not begotten out of him, as is his son. Since therefore you have already confessed that Mani said a part of God is defiled, and you said long ago that whoever calls God, or his nature, corruptible or defilable must be anathematized, you have already pronounced the anathema that you are unwilling to admit. For this, which you said—
22:129
quia polluitur et quia mundatur, hoc ipso, quod dicis "mundatur," expressisti, quia polluitur, et non habes, unde euadas. et Manichaeus et tu dixisti. quia polluitur pars dei. anathema ergo Manichaeum aut anathemandus es cum Manichaeo. FEL. dixit: Ego non a Manichaeo didici, quia polluta est pars dei, sed a Christo didici. quia propter animam uenit, quae polluta erat.. AUG. dixit: A Christo non didicisti, quia anima pars dei est. FEL. dixit: A Christo didici, quia anima ex deo est. AUG. dixit: Et nos didicimus, quia anima ex deo est, sed non" est pars dei." sic est enim anima ex deo, quomodo factura ex artifice, non de deo, sicut filius de patre. FEL. dixit: De pollutione agimus .
——就是說它被玷污、又被潔淨——單憑你說「被潔淨」這句話,你就已表明它是被玷污了,你再無可逃避之處。摩尼和你都說神的一部分被玷污了。那麼你要咒詛摩尼,否則你就當與摩尼一同被咒詛。斐理斯說:我並非從摩尼學得神的一部分被玷污,乃是從基督學得祂為靈魂而來,因靈魂曾被玷污。奧古斯丁說:你並未從基督學得靈魂是神的一部分。斐理斯說:我從基督學得靈魂出於神。奧古斯丁說:我們也學得靈魂出於神,但並非「神的一部分」。因為靈魂出於神,正如受造之物出於其造作者,並非如聖子出於聖父那樣由神本體而出。斐理斯說:我們現在談的是玷污的問題。
—namely that it is defiled and that it is cleansed—by this very saying, 'it is cleansed,' you have expressed that it is defiled, and you have no way of escape. Both Mani and you have said that a part of God is defiled. Anathematize Mani, then, or you must be anathematized along with Mani. FELIX said: I did not learn from Mani that a part of God is defiled, but I learned from Christ that he came on account of the soul, which had been defiled. AUGUSTINE said: You did not learn from Christ that the soul is a part of God. FELIX said: I learned from Christ that the soul is from God. AUGUSTINE said: We too have learned that the soul is from God, but that it is not 'a part of God.' For the soul is from God in the way that a thing made is from its maker, not out of God as the Son is out of the Father. FELIX said: We are dealing with defilement.
22:130
si polluta est anima, quae ex deo est, et potest purgari a Christo, qui pro illa uenit, et illa pars dei, quam Manichaeus dicit, pollui potest et mundari per mandatum ipsius dei. AUG. dixit: Ecce iterum dicis partem dei pollutam purgari et paulo ante dixeras anathemandum esse, qui illam dicit corruptibilem; modo dicis, quia pollui potuit, et dicis, quia mundari potest. ut confirmes, quia pollui potuit. hoc nos de parte dei non dicimus, sed de anima dicimus, quae tamquam opus eius ex ipso est, non tamquam proles de ipso. redi ergo ad id, quod dicis, et discerne, quod dicimus: anima nec deus est nec pars dei.
倘若那出於神的靈魂被玷污了,又能被那為它而來的基督潔淨,那麼摩尼所說的神的那一部分,也能被玷污、又能藉神自己的命令得潔淨。奧古斯丁說:看哪,你又說神那被玷污的部分得了潔淨,可你方才卻說凡稱它為可朽壞者當被咒詛;如今你卻說它可能被玷污,並說它能被潔淨——藉此坐實它確曾可被玷污。這話我們並不用在神的部分上,卻用在靈魂上,因靈魂如同祂的作品而出於祂,並非如由祂本體而生的後裔。那麼回到你所說的話上來,並要分清我們所說的:靈魂既非神,也非神的一部分。
If the soul, which is from God, has been defiled, and can be purified by Christ, who came for its sake, then that part of God too, of which Mani speaks, can be defiled and cleansed through the command of God himself. AUGUSTINE said: See, again you say that a defiled part of God is purified, and a little before you had said that whoever calls it corruptible must be anathematized; now you say that it could be defiled, and you say that it can be cleansed—so as to confirm that it could be defiled. This we do not say of a part of God, but we say it of the soul, which is from him as his work, not as offspring out of him. Go back, then, to what you say, and distinguish what we say: the soul is neither God nor a part of God.
22:131
tu autem Manichaeum dicis dixisse pollui partem dei, quam dicit purgari, ut confirmet, quia polluitur. restat ergo, ut eum anathemes aut ista sentiens anathemeris. PEL. dixit: Pertinet ad deum anima, quae per peccatum coinquinata est, an non ? AUG. dixit: Pertinet, sed non est pars eius. FEL. dixit: Non hoc interrogaui. AUG. dixit: Et quid interrogasti ? FEL. dixit: Pertinet ad deum, an non pertinet? AUG. dixit: Iam dixi, et quia pertinet et quomodo pertineat. FEL. dixit: Ego quaero, utrum est ex deo. AUG. dixit: Ex deo, non de deo. FEL. dixit:
但你說摩尼曾說神的一部分被玷污,又說那部分得了潔淨,藉此坐實它是被玷污的。因此結論是:你若非咒詛他,就當自己因持守這些話而被咒詛。斐理斯說:那因罪而被污穢的靈魂,究竟屬乎神,還是不屬乎神?奧古斯丁說:它屬乎祂,但並非祂的一部分。斐理斯說:我問的不是這個。奧古斯丁說:那你問的是甚麼?斐理斯說:它屬乎神,還是不屬乎神?奧古斯丁說:我已經說了,它既屬乎祂,也說了它是如何屬乎祂。斐理斯說:我問的是它是否出於神。奧古斯丁說:出於神,但非由神本體而出。斐理斯說:
But you say that Mani said a part of God is defiled, which he says is purified, so as to confirm that it is defiled. It remains, therefore, that you either anathematize him, or be anathematized yourself for holding these things. FELIX said: Does the soul, which has been polluted through sin, belong to God, or not? AUGUSTINE said: It belongs to him, but it is not a part of him. FELIX said: That is not what I asked. AUGUSTINE said: And what did you ask? FELIX said: Does it belong to God, or does it not belong? AUGUSTINE said: I have already said both that it belongs and in what manner it belongs. FELIX said: I ask whether it is from God. AUGUSTINE said: From God, but not out of God. FELIX said:
22:132
Si nihil peccatum est, quia ex deo est et polluta est et uenit Christus liberare eam et eam liberauit a peccato, quid culpamus Manichaeum, qui dicit partem dei pollutam esse et iterum mundari? AUG. dixit: Quia iam confessus es Manichaeum dixisse partem dei esse pollutam et dicis non esse peccatum talem blasphemiam in deum effundere. nos autem dicimus quidem peccasse animam per liberum arbitrium et paenitendo purgari per misericordiam creatoris sui, quia non est ex deo tamquam pars eius uel tamquam proles eius, sed ex deo uel a deo facta est tamquam opus eius: quid intersit inter nostram fidem et uestram perfidiam, omnibus manifestum est.
倘若這並非罪,既然靈魂出於神、且被玷污了,而基督又來救它、也確實救它脫離了罪,那麼我們為何責備摩尼呢?他說神的一部分被玷污、又再得潔淨。奧古斯丁說:因為你如今已承認摩尼說神的一部分被玷污,且你竟說向神傾吐這等褻瀆並非罪。而我們則確實說,靈魂是藉自由意志犯了罪,並藉懺悔、憑其造物主的憐憫得潔淨,因它並非如神的一部分或如祂的後裔那樣出於神,乃是如祂的作品那樣從神、或由神所造。我們的信仰與你們的邪妄之間有何分別,眾人都是顯而易見的。
If it is no sin, since the soul is from God and has been defiled, and Christ came to free it and did free it from sin, why do we blame Mani, who says that a part of God has been defiled and is cleansed again? AUGUSTINE said: Because you have now confessed that Mani said a part of God is defiled, and you say it is no sin to pour out such blasphemy against God. We, however, do indeed say that the soul sinned through free will and is purified by repentance through the mercy of its Creator, since it is not from God as a part of him or as his offspring, but was made from God, or by God, as his work. What difference there is between our faith and your faithlessness is manifest to all.
22:133
itaque secundum uerba tua superiora, quia concessisti anathemandum eum, qui dicit corruptibilem dei naturamquod et Manichaeum et te dicere manifestum estquia noluisti. ut esset a te anathematus, eris cum illo anathematus. Post haec cum multis uerbis inter se agerent, FEL. dixit: Dic iam, quid uis faciam ? + AUG. dixit: (Ut anathemes Manichaeum, cuius sunt tantae istae blasphemiae; sed si ex animo facis, tunc fac . nemo enim te cogit inuitum. FEL. dixit: Deus uidet, si ex animo facio; non enim homo potest uidere . sed hoc peto, ut confirmes me. AUG. dixit: In quo uis ut confirmem te? FEL. dixit: Prior tu anathema, ut et ego postea anathemem. AUG. dixit: Ecce manu mea etiam scribo;
因此,按你自己先前的話——既然你承認凡稱神的本性為可朽壞者當被咒詛(顯然摩尼和你都這樣說)——因為你不肯作那咒詛他的人,你就必與他一同被咒詛。此後,他們彼此爭辯了許多話,斐理斯說:現在請告訴我,你要我作甚麼?奧古斯丁說:就是要你咒詛摩尼,這等重大的褻瀆都出於他;但你若出於真心去作,那就去作,因為沒有人強你所不願的。斐理斯說:我是否出於真心去作,惟有神看得見,因為沒有人能看見。但我只求你,願你堅固我。奧古斯丁說:你要我在甚麼事上堅固你?斐理斯說:你先咒詛,好叫我隨後也咒詛。奧古斯丁說:看哪,我甚至親手寫下;
And so, according to your own earlier words—since you granted that whoever calls the nature of God corruptible must be anathematized (which it is plain that both Mani and you say)—because you were unwilling to be the one to anathematize him, you will be anathematized together with him. After this, when they had argued much between themselves, FELIX said: Tell me now, what do you want me to do? AUGUSTINE said: That you anathematize Mani, whose are these so great blasphemies; but if you do it from the heart, then do it, for no one compels you against your will. FELIX said: God sees whether I do it from the heart, for no man can see it. But this I ask, that you strengthen me. AUGUSTINE said: In what do you wish me to strengthen you? FELIX said: You anathematize first, so that I too may anathematize afterward. AUGUSTINE said: See, I even write it with my own hand;
22:134
uolo enim, ut et tu manu tua scribas. FEL. dixit: Sed sic anathema, ut spiritum ipsum, qui in Manichaeo fuit et per eum ista locutus est, anathemes. Augustinus accepta charta scripsit haec uerba: Augustinus ecclesiae catholicae episcopus iam anathemaui Manichaeum et doctrinam eius et spiritum, qui per eum tam execrabiles blasphemias locutus est, quia spiritus seductor erat non ueritatis, sed nefandi erroris; et nunc anathemo supra dictum Manichaeum et spiritum erroris ipsius. Et cum eandem chartam Felici dedisset, etiam ille manu sua haec uerba scripsit:
因為我也要你親手書寫。斐理斯說:可是你要這樣咒詛,好叫你連同那在摩尼裡面、藉他說出這些話的靈也一併咒詛。奧古斯丁取過一張紙,寫下這些話:我奧古斯丁,大公教會的主教,已經咒詛摩尼並他的教義,並那藉他說出如此可憎褻瀆之言的靈,因為那是一個迷惑人的靈,並非真理之靈,乃是邪惡謬妄之靈;如今我咒詛上述的摩尼並他謬妄之靈。他把這同一張紙交給斐理斯後,斐理斯也親手寫下這些話:
for I want you also to write with your own hand. FELIX said: But anathematize in such a way as also to anathematize that very spirit which was in Mani and spoke these things through him. Augustine, taking a sheet, wrote these words: I, Augustine, bishop of the Catholic Church, have already anathematized Mani and his doctrine and the spirit which through him spoke such execrable blasphemies, because it was a spirit that seduces—not the spirit of truth, but of impious error; and now I anathematize the aforesaid Mani and the spirit of his error. And when he had given the same sheet to Felix, he too wrote these words with his own hand:
22:135
ego Felix, qui Manichaeo credideram, nunc anathemo eum et doctrinam ipsius et spiritum seductorem, qui in illo fuit, qui dixit deum partem suam genti , tenebrarum miscuisse et eam tam turpiter liberare, ut uirtutes suas transfiguraret in feminas contra masculina et ipsas iterum in masculos contra feminea daemonia, ita ut postea reliquias ipsius suae partis configat in aeternum globo tenebrarum. has omnes et ceteras blasphemias Manichaei anathemo. Augustinus episcopus his in ecclesia coram populo gestis subscripsi. Felix his gestis subscripsi.
我斐理斯,曾信從摩尼,如今咒詛他並他的教義,並那在他裡面迷惑人的靈——那靈說神將自己的一部分與黑暗族類混雜,又以如此可恥的方式解救它,把自己的諸德能變作女性以對付雄性魔鬼,又把她們再變作男性以對付雌性魔鬼,以致此後將自己那部分的殘餘永遠釘結於黑暗的球體中。摩尼這一切以及其餘的褻瀆,我都咒詛。我奧古斯丁主教,已在教會中當著眾人所行的此紀錄上署名。我斐理斯,已在此紀錄上署名。
I, Felix, who had believed in Mani, now anathematize him and his doctrine and the seducing spirit that was in him—who said that God mingled a part of himself with the race of darkness and freed it in so shameful a manner, transforming his own powers (virtutes) into females against the male demons, and these again into males against the female demons, in such a way that afterward he fastens forever in the globe of darkness the remnants of that same part of his. All these and the other blasphemies of Mani I anathematize. I, bishop Augustine, have subscribed to these proceedings enacted in the church before the people. I, Felix, have subscribed to these proceedings.
← 第 21 章第 23 章 →
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364