📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original
♥ Support

← All books · Latin Fathers › Works (City of God, On the Trinity, etc.)

Works (City of God, On the Trinity, etc.) 26 part 1/3

Latin original · 42 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 26:1–26:42 (84 verses in all)

← ch. 25ch. 27 →
next part →
ℹ️ This corpus has no morphological tagging. Glosses are matched by word form against a dictionary — a match does not prove it is the same word (an inflected form can coincide with another word’s lemma). Verify against the original and a specialist lexicon where precision matters.
ℹ️ The Chinese and English alongside are this site's own translation, made directly from the original text on this page (not the CUV or the WEB, which follow the Masoretic Text and a different textual tradition).
26:1
Credant qui uolunt malle me legendo quam legenda dictando laborare. Qui autem hoc nolunt credere, experiri uero et possunt et uolunt, dent quae legendo uel meis inquisitionibus respondeatur uel interrogationibus aliorum quas pro mea persona quam in seruitio Christi gero et pro studio quo fidem nostram aduersus errorem carnalium et animalium hominum muniri inardesco necesse est me pati, et uideant quam facile ab isto labore me temperem et quanto etiam gaudio stilum possim habere feriatum.
Let those who wish believe that I would rather labor by reading than by dictating things to be read. But those who are unwilling to believe this, yet both can and will make trial of it — let them furnish something that may be answered by my reading, whether to my own inquiries or to the questionings of others which, for the sake of the office I bear in the service of Christ and for the zeal wherewith I burn to have our faith fortified against the error of carnal and animal men, I must needs endure; and let them see how easily I would refrain from this toil, and with how great joy I could keep my pen idle.
願意的人儘可相信:我寧願藉閱讀而勞苦,勝過藉口授供人閱讀之物而勞苦。但那些不願相信此事、卻既能且願加以查驗的人——讓他們提供某些可藉我閱讀來回應之物,無論是回應我自己的探究,還是回應他人的質問(為著我在事奉基督之職分中所擔負的緣故,以及為著我熱切渴望使我們的信德得以抵禦屬肉體與屬血氣之人的謬誤而必須忍受的緣故);讓他們看看我會何等輕易地擺脫這勞苦,又能以何等的喜樂使我的筆得享安歇。
26:2
Quod si ea quae legamus de his rebus sufficienter edita in latino sermone aut non sunt aut non inueniuntur aut certe difficile a nobis inueniri queunt, graecae autem linguae non sit nobis tantus habitus ut talium rerum libris legendis et intellegendis ullo modo reperiamur idonei, quo genere litterarum ex his quae nobis pauca interpretata sunt non dubito cuncta quae utiliter quaerere possumus contineri; fratribus autem non ualeam resistere iure quo eis seruus factus sum flagitantibus ut eorum in Christo laudabilibus studiis lingua ac stilo meo quas bigas in me caritas agitat maxime seruiam. Egoque ipse multa quae nesciebam scribendo me didicisse confitear;
But if the things we might read on these matters, sufficiently set forth in the Latin tongue, either do not exist, or are not found, or at least can be found by us only with difficulty; and if we have not so great a command of the Greek language that we should in any way prove fit for reading and understanding books on such subjects — of which kind of literature I do not doubt that, from the few things translated for us, all that we can usefully seek is contained; and if I cannot resist the brethren, by the right whereby I have been made their servant, when they entreat that I should, chiefly with my tongue and pen, serve their laudable studies in Christ — the twin steeds which charity drives within me — and if I myself confess that by writing I have learned much which I did not know;
但若我們在這些事上可讀的、以拉丁文充分陳述的著作,或不存在、或找不到、或至少我們只能費力尋得;且若我們對希臘語的掌握不足,以致我們絕不能被視為適於閱讀並理解論及此類題材的書籍(我毫不懷疑,從已為我們翻譯的少數著作中,凡我們有益尋求的一切都已包含在這類文獻裡);且若我不能拒絕弟兄們——按著我被立為他們僕人的名分——當他們懇求我尤要以我的口舌與筆墨,服事他們在基督裡值得稱許的追求(這正是仁愛在我裡面所驅策的兩匹駿馬);且若我自己承認,藉著寫作我學到了許多先前所不知的事;
26:3
non debet labor hic meus cuiquam pigro aut multum docto uideri superfluus cum multis impigris multisque indoctis inter quos etiam mihi non parua ex parte sit necessarius. Ex his igitur quae ab aliis de hac re scripta iam legimus plurimum adminiculati et adiuti ea quae de trinitate uno summo summeque bono deo pie quaeri et disseri posse arbitror ipso exhortante quaerenda atque adiuuante disserenda suscepi, ut si alia non sunt huiusmodo scripta, sit quod habeamus, et legant qui uoluerint et ualuerint; si autem iam sunt, tanto facilius aliqua inueniantur quanto talia plura esse potuerint.
this labor of mine ought not to seem superfluous to anyone slothful or very learned, since it is necessary to many diligent and many unlearned men, among whom in no small part it is necessary even to me. From those things, therefore, which we have already read written by others on this matter, being greatly propped up and aided, I have undertaken to seek out — He Himself exhorting — those things which can be piously sought and discussed concerning the Trinity, the one supreme and supremely good God, and to discuss them with His help: so that, if there be no other writings of this kind, there may be something we have, and let those read who will and who are able; but if there already are such, so much the more easily will some be found, the more of such kind there may prove to be.
因此,我這勞苦不應被任何懶惰之人或極博學之人視為多餘,因它對許多勤勉之人與許多不學無術之人乃是必需的,而其中對我自己也有不小的必需之處。所以,藉著我們已讀過的、他人就此題所寫的著作,得了大大的扶持與幫助,我便著手去尋求——祂親自激勵著我——凡關於三位一體、那獨一至高至善之神所能虔敬尋求並討論之事,並靠祂的幫助加以討論:如此,若沒有別的此類著作,我們便有些許可資憑藉,願意且有能力的人儘可閱讀;但若已有此類著作,則此類越多,人就越易尋得其中一些。
26:4
Sane cum in omnibus litteris meis non solum pium lectorem sed etiam liberum correctorem desiderem, multo maxime in his ubi ipsa magnitudo quaestionis utinam tam multos inuentores habere posset quam multos contradictores habet. Verumtamen sicut lectorem meum nolo esse mihi deditum, ita correctorem nolo sibi. Ille me non amet amplius quam catholicam fidem; ille se non amet amplius quam catholicam ueritatem. Sicut illi dico: Noli meis litteris quasi scripturis canonicis inseruire, sed in illis et quod non credebas cum inueneris incunctanter crede, in istis autem quod certum non habebas nisi certum intellexeris noli firme retinere; ita illi dico:
Truly, since in all my writings I desire not only a pious reader but also a free corrector, most of all in these where the very magnitude of the question — would that it might have as many discoverers as it has gainsayers! Nevertheless, just as I do not wish my reader to be devoted to me, so I do not wish my corrector to be devoted to himself. Let the one not love me more than the catholic faith; let the other not love himself more than the catholic truth. As I say to the former: Do not be enslaved to my writings as though to canonical Scriptures, but in the former, when you find even what you did not believe, believe without hesitation; in the latter, however, hold fast firmly to nothing you did not hold as certain unless you have understood it to be certain — so I say to the latter:
誠然,既然在我所有的著作中,我不僅渴望一位虔敬的讀者,也渴望一位自由的糾正者,尤其在這些論題中,這問題本身之浩大——但願它得著的發現者能如它所遭的反對者那般眾多!然而,正如我不願我的讀者委身於我,我也不願我的糾正者委身於他自己。願前者愛我不過於愛大公信仰;願後者愛他自己不過於愛大公真理。正如我對前者說:不要像對正典聖經那樣受制於我的著作,倒要在正典中,當你發現連自己先前不信之事時,也毫不遲疑地相信;然而在我的著作中,凡你未曾確知之事,除非你已明白它確實無誤,就不要堅執固守——照樣我也對後者說:
26:5
Noli meas litteras ex tua opinione uel contentione sed ex diuina lectione uel inconcussa ratione corrigere; si quid in eis ueri comprehenderis, exsistendo non est meum at intellegendo et amando et tuum sit et meum; si quid autem falsi conuiceris, errando fuerit meum sed iam cauendo nec tuum sit nec meum. Hinc itaque tertius iste liber sumit exordium quousque secundus peruenerat.
Do not correct my writings out of your own opinion or contention, but out of the divine reading or unshaken reason. If you comprehend anything true in them, by its existing it is not mine, but by your understanding and loving it, let it be both yours and mine; but if you convict anything of falsity, by my erring it will have been mine, but now, by taking heed, let it be neither yours nor mine. Hence, then, this third book takes its beginning, up to the point where the second had reached.
不要憑你自己的意見或爭辯來糾正我的著作,乃要憑神聖的誦讀或不可動搖的理性。你若在其中領會任何真確之事,就其存在而言它並非屬我;但就你理解並愛慕它而言,就讓它既屬你也屬我。你若查出任何虛謬之事,就我的謬誤而言它曾是屬我的;但如今,藉著謹慎防範,就讓它既不屬你也不屬我。於是,這第三卷便從第二卷所抵達之處起始。
26:6
Cum enim ad id uentum esset ut uellemus ostendere non ideo minorem patre filium quia ille misit, hic missus est, nec ideo minorem utroque spiritum sanctum quia et ab illo et ab illo missus in euangelio legitur, suscepimus hoc quaerere cum illuc missus sit filius ubi erat quia in hunc mundum uenit et in hoc mundo erat, cum illuc etiam spiritus sanctus ubi et ipse erat, quoniam spiritus domini repleuit orbem terrarum, et hoc quod continet omnia scientiam habet uocis, utrum propterea missus sit dominus quia ex occulto in carne natus est et de sinu patris ad oculos hominum in forma serui tamquam egressus apparuit;
For when we had come to the point of wishing to show that the Son is not on that account less than the Father because the one sent and the other was sent, nor the Holy Spirit less than both because He is read in the Gospel to have been sent both by the one and by the other, we undertook to inquire this: since the Son was sent thither where He was — because He came into this world and was in this world — and since the Holy Spirit likewise was sent thither where He too was, seeing that the Spirit of the Lord filled the world, and that which contains all things has knowledge of the voice, whether the Lord was for this reason said to be sent, because from what was hidden He was born in the flesh, and from the bosom of the Father appeared, as it were coming forth, to the eyes of men in the form of a servant;
因為當我們要證明:聖子並不因這一位差遣、那一位被差而低於聖父,聖靈也不因福音書中記載祂既被這一位又被那一位差遣而低於二者時,我們便著手探究此事:既然聖子被差往祂本已在的地方(因祂進入了這世界,且原在這世界中),既然聖靈同樣被差往祂本已在的地方(因主的靈充滿了世界,那包羅萬有者曉得人聲的意思),那麼,主之被稱為「被差」,是否是因祂從隱藏中在肉身裡誕生,並從父的懷中,彷彿出來一般,以僕人的形狀顯給世人的眼目;
26:7
ideo etiam spiritus sanctus quia et ipse corporali specie quasi columba uisus est et linguis diuisis uelut ignis; ut hoc eis fuerit mitti, ad aspectum mortalium in aliqua forma corporea de spiritali secreto procedere, quod pater quoniam non fecit tantummodo misisse non etiam missus esse dictus sit. Deinde quaesitum est cur et pater non aliquando dictus sit missus si per illas species corporales quae oculis antiquorum apparuerunt ipse demonstrabatur. Si autem filius tunc demonstrabatur, cur tanto post missus diceretur cum plenitudo temporis uenit ut ex femina nasceretur, quandoquidem et antea mittebatur cum in illis formis corporaliter apparebat.
and the Holy Spirit likewise, because He too was seen in bodily form as a dove and in cloven tongues as it were of fire; so that to be sent was for them to proceed forth from spiritual secrecy into some bodily form to the sight of mortals — which, because the Father did not do, He was said only to have sent and not also to have been sent. Then it was asked why the Father too was not at some time said to be sent, if He Himself was shown through those bodily forms which appeared to the eyes of the ancients. But if the Son was then shown, why was He said to be sent so long afterward, when the fullness of time came that He should be born of a woman, seeing that even before He was sent when He appeared bodily in those forms.
聖靈也同樣如此,因祂也曾以身體的形狀被看見如鴿子,又以彷彿火焰的分開的舌頭被看見;如此,對他們而言,「被差」便是從屬靈的隱密中出來,以某種身體的形狀顯於世人的眼前——因聖父未曾如此行,祂便只被說是差遣者,而非也被差者。於是又有人問:若聖父自己曾藉那些顯給古人眼目的身體形狀被顯明,為何聖父也不曾在某時被說是「被差」?但若聖子那時已被顯明,為何在那麼久之後,當日期滿足、祂要從婦人所生時,才被說是「被差」呢?既然此前,當祂以身體顯於那些形狀中時,祂就已在被差了。
26:8
Aut si non recte missus diceretur nisi cum uerbum caro factum est, cur spiritus sanctus missus legatur cuius incarnatio talis non facta est. Si uero per illas antiquas demonstrationes nec pater nec filius sed spiritus sanctus ostendebatur, cur etiam ipse nunc diceretur missus cum illis modis et antea mitteretur. Deinde subdiuisimus ut haec diligentissime tractarentur, et tripertitam fecimus quaestionem cuius una pars in secundo libro explicata est, duae sunt reliquae de quibus deinceps disserere aggrediar.
Or if He could not rightly be said to be sent except when the Word was made flesh, why is the Holy Spirit read to have been sent, whose incarnation of such a kind did not take place? But if through those ancient manifestations neither the Father nor the Son but the Holy Spirit was shown, why is He too now said to be sent, when He was sent even before in those manners? Then we subdivided the matter, that these things might be handled most diligently, and we made the question threefold, one part of which has been unfolded in the second book, while two remain, of which I shall next proceed to discourse.
或者,若祂惟有在道成肉身時才能正確地被稱為「被差」,那麼聖靈——祂並未經歷這樣的道成肉身——為何被記載為「被差」呢?但若藉那些古時的顯現,被顯明的既非聖父也非聖子、乃是聖靈,那麼祂既在此前也曾以那些方式被差,為何如今又被說是「被差」呢?於是我們將此事再加細分,使這些事得以極其細緻地處理,並使這問題成為三重的:其中一部分已在第二卷中闡明,尚餘兩部分,我接下來便要著手論述。
26:9
Iam enim quaesitum atque tractatum est in illis antiquis corporalibus formis et uisis non tantummodo patre nec tantummodo filium nec tantummodo spiritum sanctum apparuisse, sed aut indifferenter dominum deum qui trinitas ipsa intellegitur aut quamlibet ex trinitate personam quam lectionis textus indiciis circumstantibus significaret. [I 4] Nunc ergo primum quaerimus quod sequitur. Nam secundo loco in illa distributione positum est utrum ad hoc opus tantummodo creatura formata sit in qua deus, sicut tunc oportuisse iudicauit, humanis ostenderetur aspectibus;
For it has already been inquired and treated that in those ancient bodily forms and visions there appeared neither the Father alone, nor the Son alone, nor the Holy Spirit alone, but either indifferently the Lord God, who is understood as the Trinity itself, or whichever person of the Trinity the text of the reading might signify by the surrounding indications. Now, therefore, we first inquire what follows. For in the second place in that division it was set down: whether for this work alone a creature was formed in which God, as He then judged fitting, might be shown to human sight;
因為前面已探究並處理過:在那些古時的身體形狀與異象中,顯現的既非單單聖父、亦非單單聖子、亦非單單聖靈,乃是或不加分別地那位被理解為三位一體本身的主神,或是三位一體中某一位位格(照著誦讀經文藉周圍跡象所指示的)。因此,如今我們首先探究接下來的問題。因為在那區分中,第二個被列出的問題是:是否惟獨為了這工作,才造出某個受造物,使神照祂當時所判定為合宜的,藉此顯給人的眼目;
26:10
an angeli qui iam erant ita mittebantur ut ex persona dei loquerentur, assumentes corporalem speciem de creatura corporea in usum ministerii sui; aut ipsum corpus suum cui non subduntur sed subditum regunt mutantes atque uertentes in species quas uellent accommodatas atque aptas actionibus suis secundum attributam sibi a creatore potentiam. Qua parte quaestionis quantum dominus dederit pertractata postremo erit uidendum id quod institueramus inquirere, utrum filius et spiritus sanctus et antea mittebantur, et si ita est quid inter illam missionem et eam quam in euangelio legimus distet;
or whether angels who already existed were so sent that they spoke in the person of God, taking on a bodily form from bodily creation for the use of their ministry; or whether it was their very own body — to which they are not subject but which they rule as subject — that they changed and turned into such forms as they willed, accommodated and fitted to their actions, according to the power attributed to them by the Creator. When this part of the question has been thoroughly treated, so far as the Lord shall grant, it will finally remain to be seen what we had set out to inquire: whether the Son and the Holy Spirit were also sent before, and if so, what difference there is between that sending and the one we read of in the Gospel;
抑或那些早已存在的天使被差遣,以致他們以神的位格說話,為著他們職事之用,從有形的受造物中取來一個身體的形狀;抑或是他們自己的身體(他們不服屬於它,反倒管轄它、使它服屬於己),照著造物主賦予他們的能力,將它改變並轉化為他們所願、適合並合宜於他們行動的各種形狀。當這部分問題照主所賜的得到徹底處理之後,最終便要察看我們所著手探究的:聖子與聖靈是否此前也曾被差遣,若是如此,那次差遣與我們在福音書中所讀到的差遣之間,有何區別;
26:11
an missus non sit aliquis eorum nisi cum uel filius factus est ex Maria uirgine uel cum spiritus sanctus uisibili specie siue in columba siue in igneis linguis apparuit. Sed fateor excedere uires intentionis meae utrum angeli manente spiritali sui corporis qualitate per hanc occultius operantes assumant ex inferioribus elementis corpulentioribus quod sibi coaptatum quasi aliquam uestem mutent et uertant in quaslibet species corporales etiam ipsas ueras sicut aqua uera in uerum uinum conuersa est a domino, an ipsa propria corpora sua transforment in quod uoluerint accommodate ad id quod agunt. Sed quodlibet horum sit ad praesentem quaestionem non pertinet.
or whether none of them was sent except when either the Son was made of the Virgin Mary or the Holy Spirit appeared in a visible form, whether in the dove or in the fiery tongues. But I confess that it exceeds the strength of my purpose to determine whether the angels, while the spiritual quality of their body remains, working more hiddenly through it, take on from the lower and grosser elements something fitted to themselves, which they change and turn, as though some garment, into whatever bodily forms — even true ones, just as true water was turned into true wine by the Lord — or whether they transform their own proper bodies into whatever they will, adapted to what they do. But whichever of these it be, it does not pertain to the present question.
抑或他們中無一被差遣,除非是聖子由童貞女馬利亞所生,或聖靈以可見的形狀——無論在鴿子中或在火焰般的舌頭中——顯現之時。但我承認,要斷定以下之事乃超乎我意圖之力所及:天使在其身體之屬靈性質仍存的情況下,藉此更隱密地運作,是從較低較粗的元素中取來某物合宜於己,將它如同某種衣裳一般改變並轉化為任何身體的形狀——甚至是真實的形狀,正如主將真水變為真酒——抑或他們將自己本有的身體轉化為他們所願、適合其所行之物。但無論是哪一種,都與眼前的問題無關。
26:12
Et quamuis haec quoniam homo sum nullo experimento possim comprehendere sicut angeli qui haec agunt, et magis ea norunt quam ego noui quatenus mutetur corpus meum in affectu uoluntatis meae siue quod in me siue quod ex aliis expertus sum; quid horum tamen ex diuinarum scripturarum auctoritatibus credam nunc non opus est dicere ne cogar probare et fiat sermo longior de re qua non indiget praesens quaestio. Illud nunc uidendum est utrum angeli tunc agebat et illas corporum species apparentes oculis hominum et illas uoces auribus insonantes cum ipsa sensibilis creatura ad nutum seruiens conditoris in quod opus erat pro tempore uertebatur sicut in libro sapientiae scriptum est:
And although, since I am a man, I can grasp these things by no experiment, as the angels do who work them, and they know them better than I know to what extent my body is changed by the affection of my will, whether from what I have experienced in myself or from others — yet which of these I should believe on the authority of the divine Scriptures there is now no need to say, lest I be compelled to prove it, and the discourse become longer concerning a matter which the present question does not require. This now must be seen: whether the angels were then acting both those bodily forms appearing to the eyes of men and those voices sounding in their ears, while the very sensible creature, serving at the nod of its Creator, was turned for the time into whatever work was needful, as is written in the book of Wisdom:
雖然我既是人,便無法像行這些事的天使那樣藉經驗來領會這些事,而他們對這些事的認識,勝過我對「我的身體如何因我意志的情感而改變」的認識(無論是我在自己身上所經歷的,或從他人身上所經歷的)——然而其中我當憑神聖聖經的權威相信哪一種,如今無需說明,免得我被迫加以證明,使論述就一件當前問題並不需要的事變得更長。如今當察看的是:那時天使是否既造成那些顯於世人眼目的身體形狀,又造成那些響於其耳中的聲音,而那有感覺的受造物本身,聽從其造物者的示意,按時被轉化為所需要的工作,正如智慧書中所寫:
26:13
Creatura enim tibi factori deseruiens extenditur in tormentum aduersus iniustos, et lenior fit ad benefaciendum his qui in te confidunt. Propter hoc et tunc in omnia se transfigurans omnium nutrici gratiae tuae deseruiebat ad uoluntatem horum quia te desiderabant. Peruenit enim potentia uoluntatis dei per creaturam spiritalem usque ad effectus uisibiles atque sensibiles creaturae corporalis. Vbi enim non operatur quod uult dei omnipotentis sapientia quae pertendit a fine usque ad finem fortiter et disponit omnia suauiter?
'For the creature serving Thee its Maker is strained to torment against the unjust, and grows gentler to do good to those who trust in Thee. For this cause, even then, transforming itself into all things, it served Thy grace, the nurse of all, according to the will of those who longed for Thee.' For the power of God's will reaches through the spiritual creature even unto the visible and sensible effects of the bodily creature. For where does not that wisdom of God almighty work what it wills, which reacheth from end to end mightily, and ordereth all things sweetly?
「因為受造之物服事你這造它的主,就繃緊起來,向不義之人施行懲罰,又變得更溫和,向倚靠你的人施恩。為此緣故,那時它也變化成萬物,服事你這眾生之乳養者的恩典,照著那些渴慕你之人的心願。」因為神旨意的能力,藉著屬靈的受造物,直達至有形受造物那可見、可感的效果。因為那全能之神的智慧,從這邊直達那邊,大能施展,又溫柔地安排萬事,祂豈有不隨其所願而運作之處呢?
26:14
[II 7] Sed alius est ordo naturalis in conuersione et mutabilitate corporum qui quamuis etiam ipse ad nutum dei seruiat perseuerantia tamen consuetudinis amisit admirationem, sicuti sunt quae uel breuissimis uel certe non longis interuallis temporum caelo, terra, marique mutantur siue nascentibus siue occidentibus rebus siue alias alter atque aliter apparentibus;
But there is another natural order in the conversion and mutability of bodies, which, although it too serves at the nod of God, yet by the constancy of custom has lost its power to cause wonder — such as those things which are changed at very brief, or at least not long, intervals of time in heaven, on earth, and in the sea, whether as things come to birth or perish, or appear now in one way, now in another;
然而,在物體的轉變與可變性中,還有另一種自然的秩序,它雖也聽從神的示意,卻因其慣常的恆定而失去了引人驚奇的力量——例如那些在天上、地上、海中,於極短、或至少不長的時間間隔內發生變化之物,無論是萬物的生成或消逝,或是它們時而以此、時而以彼方式的顯現;
26:15
alia uero quamuis ex ipso ordine uenientia tamen propter longiora interualla temporum minus usitata, quae licet multi stupeant ab inquisitoribus huius saeculi comprehensa sunt et progressu generationum quo saepius repetita et a pluribus cognita eo minus mira sunt, sicuti sunt defectus luminarium et raro exsistentes quaedam species siderum et terrae motus et monstrosi partus animantium et quaeque similia, quorum nihil fit nisi dei uoluntate sed plerisque non apparet.
but others, though coming from that same order, yet on account of longer intervals of time are less familiar, which, though many are amazed at them, have been grasped by the investigators of this age, and by the progress of generations, whereby they are more often repeated and known by more people, become the less wondrous — such as the eclipses of the luminaries, and certain rarely occurring appearances of the stars, and earthquakes, and monstrous births of living things, and whatever else is similar, none of which happens except by the will of God, though to most people this does not appear.
但另有一些,雖出於那同一秩序,卻因較長的時間間隔而較不為人所熟悉,這些事雖有許多人為之驚異,卻已被這時代的探究者所把握,且藉著世代的推進,因它們更頻繁地重演、為更多人所認識,便越發不足為奇——例如日月的虧蝕、星辰某些罕見的顯象、地震、動物的怪異生產,以及一切類似之事,這些無一不是出於神的旨意而發生,儘管對大多數人而言,這並不顯明。
26:16
Itaque licuit uanitati philosophorum etiam causis aliis ea tribuere uel ueris sed proximis, cum omnino uidere non possent superiorem ceteris omnibus causam, id est uoluntatem dei, uel falsis et ne ab ipsa quidem peruestigatione corporalium rerum atque motionum sed a sua suspicione et errore prolatis. Dicam si potero quiddam exempli gratia quo haec apertiora sint. Est certe in corpore humano quaedam moles carnis et formae species et ordo distinctioque membrorum et temperatio ualetudinis.
And so it has been permitted to the vanity of the philosophers to attribute these things also to other causes — either true but proximate ones, since they could by no means see the cause superior to all others, that is, the will of God — or false ones, and brought forth not even from any investigation of bodily things and motions, but from their own conjecture and error. I shall say, if I can, something by way of example, whereby these matters may be clearer. There is certainly in the human body a certain mass of flesh, and a shapeliness of form, and an order and distinction of members, and a due proportion of health.
於是,哲學家的虛妄便得以將這些事也歸因於其他緣由——或是真實但屬近因的緣由(因他們絕無法看見那超乎一切之上的緣由,即神的旨意)——或是虛假的緣由,且並非出於對有形之物及其運動的任何探究,乃是出於他們自己的臆測與謬誤。我若能夠,便舉一例來說明,好使這些事更為清楚。人的身體中,確有某種肉的體積、形狀的勻稱、肢體的秩序與分別,以及健康的適當比例。
26:17
Hoc corpus inspirata anima regit eademque rationalis, et ideo quamuis mutabilis tamen quae possit illius incommutabilis sapientiae particeps esse ut sit participatio eius in idipsum, sicut in psalmo scriptum est de omnibus sanctis ex quibus tamquam lapidibus uiuis aedificatur illa Hierusalem mater nostra aeterna in caelis. Ita enim canitur: Hierusalem quae aedificatur ut ciuitas, cuius participatio eius in idipsum. Idipsum quippe hoc loco illud summum et incommutabile bonum intellegitur quod deus est atque sapientia uoluntasque ipsius, cui cantatur alio loco: mutabis ea et mutabuntur; ut autem idem ipse es.
A soul inbreathed governs this body — a soul also rational, and therefore, though changeable, yet such as can be a partaker of that unchangeable Wisdom, so that there may be a participation of it in the selfsame, as is written in the Psalm concerning all the saints, of whom, as of living stones, is built that Jerusalem our eternal mother in the heavens. For thus it is sung: 'Jerusalem, which is builded as a city, whose participation is in the selfsame.' For the selfsame in this place is understood as that supreme and unchangeable good which is God, and His Wisdom and Will, to whom it is sung in another place: 'Thou shalt change them and they shall be changed; but Thou art the selfsame.'
被吹入的一個魂管理著這身體——這魂也是有理性的,因此雖是可變的,卻能成為那不變之智慧的分享者,使得對它的分享得以「歸於同一者」,正如詩篇中論到眾聖徒所寫的——那在天上永遠的耶路撒冷、我們的母,正是以他們如同活石建造而成。經上如此歌唱:「耶路撒冷被建造,如同一座城,其分享乃歸於同一者。」因為此處的「同一者」被理解為那至高不變之善,即神,並祂的智慧與旨意,別處對祂如此歌唱:「你要更換它們,它們就都改變;惟有你永不改變。」
26:18
[III] Constituamus ergo animo talem sapientem cuius anima rationalis iam sit particeps incommutabilis aeternaeque ueritatis quam de omnibus suis actionibus consulat, nec aliquid omnino faciat quod non in ea cognouerit esse faciendum ut ei subditus eique obtemperans recte faciat. Iste si consulta summa ratione diuinae iustitiae quam in secreto audiret aure cordis sui eaque sibi iubente in aliquo officio misericordiae corpus labore fatigaret aegritudinemque contraheret, consultisque medicis ab alio diceretur causam morbi esse corporis siccitatem, ab alio autem humoris immoderationem;
Let us, then, set before our mind such a wise man, whose rational soul is already a partaker of the unchangeable and eternal truth, which he consults concerning all his actions, and does nothing at all which he has not recognized in it as needing to be done, so that, subject to it and obeying it, he may act rightly. If this man, having consulted the supreme reason of divine justice — which he heard in secret with the ear of his heart — and at its bidding wearied his body with labor in some office of mercy and contracted an illness, and, the physicians having been consulted, it were said by one that the cause of the disease was a dryness of the body, but by another an excess of humor;
那麼,讓我們在心中設想這樣一位智者,他那有理性的魂已經是那不變永恆真理的分享者,凡他一切行動他都就此真理諮詢,且絕不行任何他未在其中認出為當行之事,以致他順服它、聽從它,得以正當行事。這位智者若諮詢了神聖公義那至高的理性——他以心之耳在隱密中聽見它——並照它的吩咐,在某項憐憫的職事中以勞苦使自己的身體疲乏,因而染上疾病,且既諮詢了醫生,一位說病因是身體的乾燥,另一位卻說是體液的過剩;
26:19
unus eorum ueram causam diceret, alter erraret, uterque tamen de proximis causis, id est corporalibus pronuntiaret. At si illius siccitatis causa quaereretur et inueniretur uoluntarius labor, iam uentum esset ad superiorem causam quae ab anima proficisceretur ad afficiendum corpus quod regit; sed nec ipsa prima esset. Illa enim procul dubio superior erat in ipsa incommutabili sapientia cui hominis sapientis anima in caritate seruiens et ineffabiliter iubenti obediens uoluntarium laborem susceperat. Ita non nisi dei uoluntas causa prima illius aegritudinis ueracissime reperiretur.
one of them would state the true cause, the other would err, yet both would pronounce concerning proximate, that is, bodily, causes. But if the cause of that dryness were sought and found to be voluntary labor, one would already have come to a higher cause, which proceeds from the soul to affect the body which it rules; yet not even this would be the first. For that first cause was without doubt higher still, in the very unchangeable Wisdom, which the soul of the wise man, serving it in love and obeying it as it ineffably commanded, had undertaken the voluntary labor. Thus nothing but the will of God would most truly be found to be the first cause of that illness.
他們中一位會道出真因,另一位則會出錯,然而二者所論斷的都是近因,即身體方面的緣由。但若尋究那乾燥的緣由,發現是自願的勞苦,那便已抵達一個更高的緣由,這緣由是從魂發出,以影響它所管理的身體;然而連這也不是最初的緣由。因為那最初的緣由無疑更為崇高,存於那不變的智慧本身,智者的魂在愛中服事它、聽從它那不可言喻的命令,遂承擔了那自願的勞苦。如此,惟有神的旨意才最真實地被發現為那疾病的最初緣由。
26:20
Iam uero si in labore officioso et pio adhibuisset ille sapiens ministros conlaborantes secum in opere bono, nec tamen eadem uoluntate deo seruientes sed ad carnalium cupiditatum suarum mercedem peruenire cupientes uel incommoda carnalia deuitantes; adhibuisset etiam iumenta si hoc exigeret illius operis implendi procuratio, quae utique iumenta irrationalia essent animantia nec ideo mouerent membra sub sarcinis quod aliquid de illo bono opere cogitarent sed naturali appetitu suae uoluptatis et deuitatione molestiae; postremo adhibuisset ipsa etiam corpora omni sensu carentia quae illi operi essent necessaria, frumentum scilicet, uinum, oleum, uestem, nummum, codicem, et si qua huiusmodi.
But now, if in this dutiful and pious labor that wise man had employed helpers laboring together with him in the good work, yet not serving God with the same will, but desiring to attain the reward of their carnal lusts, or to avoid carnal discomforts; and had employed also beasts of burden, if the management of accomplishing that work so required — which beasts of burden would surely be irrational animals, and would not therefore move their limbs under their loads because they thought anything of that good work, but by the natural appetite of their own pleasure and the avoidance of trouble; and finally had employed even those bodies wholly lacking all sensation which were necessary to that work, namely grain, wine, oil, clothing, money, a book, and whatever is of this kind.
但如今,若那智者在這盡責而虔敬的勞苦中,雇用了一些與他一同從事善工的助手,然而他們並非以同樣的心志服事神,乃是渴望得著他們肉體私慾的酬報,或躲避肉體的不適;又若完成那工作的經營有此需要,也用上了馱獸,這些馱獸自然是無理性的牲畜,牠們在重擔之下挪動肢體,並非因對那善工有何思念,乃是出於對自身歡愉的天性慾求與對麻煩的躲避;最終他也用上了那些全然無知覺、卻為那工作所必需之物,即五穀、酒、油、衣裳、錢財、書卷,以及此類的一切。
26:21
In his certe omnibus in illo opere uersantibus corporibus siue animatis siue inanimis quaecumque mouerentur, attererentur, repararentur, exterminarentur, reformarentur, alio atque alio modo locis et temporibus affecta mutarentur — num alia esset istorum omnium uisibilium et mutabilium factorum causa nisi illa inuisibilis et incommutabilis uoluntas dei per animam iustam sicut sedem sapientiae cunctis utens et malis et irrationalibus animis et postremo corporibus, siue quae illis inspirarentur et animarentur siue omni sensu carentibus, cum primitus uteretur ipsa bona anima et sancta quam sibi ad pium et religiosum obsequium subdidisset?
In all these bodies engaged in that work, whether animate or inanimate — whatever were moved, worn away, repaired, destroyed, reformed, affected and changed in one way or another in places and times — surely there would be no other cause of all these visible and changeable deeds than that invisible and unchangeable will of God, using through the just soul, as the seat of Wisdom, all things — even evil and irrational souls, and lastly bodies, whether those breathed into and animated, or those lacking all sensation — since it first used that very soul, good and holy, which it had subjected to itself for pious and religious obedience?
在所有這些從事那工作的物體中,無論有生命或無生命——凡被挪動、磨損、修復、毀壞、重塑者,凡在不同地方、不同時間以此或彼方式受影響而改變者——這一切可見且可變之作為,除了神那不可見且不變的旨意,難道還會有別的緣由嗎?這旨意藉著那作為智慧之座的義魂,運用萬物——甚至邪惡與無理性的靈,以及末後那些物體(無論是被吹入生氣而有生命的,或全然無知覺的)——祂既首先運用那本身良善聖潔、被祂使之服屬以致虔敬而虔誠順服的魂。
26:22
Quod ergo de uno sapiente quamuis adhuc corpus mortale gestante, quamuis ex parte uidente, posuimus exempli gratia, hoc de aliqua domo ubi aliquorum talium societas est, hoc de ciuitate uel etiam de orbe terrarum licet cogitare si penes sapientes sancteque ac perfecte deo subditos sit principatus et regimen rerum humanarum. [IV] Sed hoc qui nondum est (oportet enim nos in hac peregrinatione prius mortaliter exerceri et per uires mansuetudinis et patientiae in flagellis erudiri), illa ipsam supernam atque caelestem unde peregrinamur patriam cogitemus.
What, therefore, we have set down by way of example concerning one wise man — though still bearing a mortal body, though seeing but in part — this it is permitted to think concerning some household where there is a society of some such men, this concerning a city, or even concerning the whole world, if the sovereignty and governance of human affairs be in the hands of men wise and holy and perfectly subject to God. But since this is not yet the case (for it is fitting that we should first be exercised mortally in this pilgrimage, and be instructed under scourges through the strength of meekness and patience), let us think upon that supernal and heavenly fatherland itself, whence we are on pilgrimage.
因此,我們就一位智者所立為例證之事(他雖仍帶著會朽的身體,雖看見的只是一部分)——這也可用來思想某個有若干這類人組成之群體的家庭,思想一座城,甚至思想整個世界,倘若人類事務的主權與治理是在那些智慧、聖潔、且完全服屬於神之人的手中。但既然此事尚未實現(因我們理當先在這客旅之途中受會朽之操練,並藉溫柔與忍耐之力在鞭打之下受教導),就讓我們思想那至上而屬天的家鄉本身,就是我們作客旅所離開的家鄉。
26:23
Illic enim dei uoluntas qui facit angelos suos spiritus et ministros suos ignem ardentem, in spiritibus summa pace atque amicitia copulatis et in unam uoluntatem quodam spiritali caritatis igne conflatis tamquam in excelsa et sancta et secreta sede praesidens uelut in domo sua et in templo suo. Inde se quibusdam ordinatissimis creaturae motibus primo spiritalibus deinde corporalibus per cuncta diffundit et utitur omnibus ad incommutabile arbitrium sententiae suae, siue incorporeis siue corporeis rebus, siue rationalibus siue irrationalibus spiritibus, siue bonis per eius gratiam siue malis per propriam uoluntatem.
For there the will of God — who maketh His angels spirits and His ministers a flaming fire — presides, in spirits joined together in supreme peace and friendship, and fused into one will by a certain spiritual fire of charity, as in a lofty and holy and secret seat, as it were in His own house and in His own temple. Thence, by certain most well-ordered motions of the creature — first spiritual, then bodily — He diffuses Himself through all things and uses all for the unchangeable decision of His judgment, whether incorporeal or corporeal things, whether rational or irrational spirits, whether good ones through His grace or evil ones through their own will.
因為在那裡,神的旨意——祂以風為使者,以火焰為僕役——臨在於眾靈之中,這些靈在至高的平安與友愛裡聯結為一,並藉著某種屬靈的仁愛之火熔鑄為一個意志,如在崇高、聖潔而隱密的座位上,彷彿在祂自己的家中、祂自己的殿中。祂便從那裡藉受造物某些極有秩序的運動——先是屬靈的,然後是屬身體的——將自己遍布於萬物,並運用一切以成就祂裁斷那不變的決意,無論是無形或有形之物,無論是有理性或無理性的靈,無論是藉祂恩典而善的,或憑自己意志而惡的。
26:24
Sed quemadmodum corpora crassiora et inferiora per subtiliora et potentiora quodam ordine reguntur, ita omnia corpora spiritum uitae, et spiritus uitae irrationalis per spiritum uitae rationalem, et spiritus uitae rationalis desertor atque peccator per spiritum uitae rationalem pium et iustum, et ille per ipsum deum, ac sic uniuersa creatura per creatorem suum ex quo et per quem et in quo etiam condita atque instituta est; ac per hoc uoluntas dei est prima et summa causa omnium corporalium specierum atque motionum.
But just as grosser and lower bodies are governed in a certain order through the more subtle and more powerful, so all bodies are governed through the spirit of life, and the spirit of irrational life through the spirit of rational life, and the deserting and sinning spirit of rational life through the pious and just spirit of rational life, and that one through God Himself; and thus the whole creation through its Creator, from whom and through whom and in whom it was also founded and established. And through this, the will of God is the first and supreme cause of all bodily forms and motions.
但正如較粗較低的物體按某種秩序藉較精細、較有力者受治理,照樣一切物體都藉生命之靈受治理,無理性之生命的靈藉有理性之生命的靈受治理,而那背棄且犯罪之有理性生命的靈,藉那虔敬公義之有理性生命的靈受治理,那靈又藉神自己受治理;如此,整個受造界都藉其造物者受治理,萬有本是從祂、藉祂、並在祂裡面被創造並被設立的。藉此,神的旨意乃是一切身體形狀與運動的最初、至高的緣由。
26:25
Nihil enim fit uisibiliter et sensibiliter quod non de interiore inuisibili atque intellegibili aula summi imperatoris aut iubeatur aut permittatur secundum ineffabilem iustitiam praemiorum atque poenarum, gratiarum et retributionum, in ista totius creaturae amplissima quadam immensaque republica.
For nothing happens visibly and sensibly which is not either commanded or permitted from the inner, invisible, and intelligible court of the supreme Emperor, according to the ineffable justice of rewards and punishments, of graces and requitals, in this most ample and immense commonwealth, as it were, of the whole creation.
因為凡可見、可感地發生之事,無一不是從那至高君王內在、不可見、可理解的宮廷所吩咐或所允許的,乃是照著賞罰、恩典與報應那不可言喻的公義,在這整個受造界如此浩大無邊的共和國中而行的。
26:26
Si ergo apostolus Paulus quamuis adhuc portaret sarcinam corporis quod corrumpitur et aggrauat animam, quamuis adhuc ex parte atque in aenigmate uideret, optans dissolui et esse cum Christo et in semetipso ingemiscens, adoptionem exspectans redemptionem corporis sui, potuit tamen significando praedicare dominum Iesum Christum, aliter per linguam suam, aliter per epistulam, aliter per sacramentum corporis et sanguinis eius;
If, therefore, the Apostle Paul — although he still bore the burden of the body which is corrupted and weighs down the soul, although he still saw in part and in an enigma, longing to be dissolved and to be with Christ, and groaning within himself, awaiting the adoption, the redemption of his body — could nevertheless proclaim the Lord Jesus Christ by signifying, in one way through his tongue, in another through his epistle, in another through the sacrament of His body and blood;
因此,倘若使徒保羅——雖然他仍背負著那朽壞並壓垂魂的身體之重擔,雖然他所看見的仍是一部分、仍如在謎中,切望離世與基督同在,且在自己裡面歎息,等候得著兒子的名分、身體得贖——卻仍能藉著表徵來傳揚主耶穌基督,以一種方式藉他的舌頭,以另一種方式藉他的書信,又以另一種方式藉祂身體與血的聖禮;
26:27
nec linguam quippe eius nec membranas et atramentum nec significantes sonos lingua editos nec signa litterarum conscripta pelliculis corpus Christi et sanguinem dicimus, sed illud tantum quod ex fructibus terrae acceptum et prece mystica consecratum rite sumimus ad salutem spiritalem in memoriam pro nobis dominicae passionis, quod cum per manus hominum ad illam uisibilem speciem perducatur non sanctificatur ut sit tam magnum sacramentum nisi operante inuisibiliter spiritu dei, cum haec omnia quae per corporales motus in illo opere fiunt deus operetur mouens primitus inuisibilia ministrorum siue animas hominum siue occultorum spirituum sibi subditas seruitutes;
for indeed we call neither his tongue, nor the parchments and ink, nor the significant sounds uttered by the tongue, nor the signs of letters written on little skins, the body and blood of Christ; but only that which, taken from the fruits of the earth and consecrated by mystic prayer, we rightly receive unto spiritual salvation in memory of the Lord's passion for us — which, though it be brought by the hands of men to that visible form, is not sanctified so as to be so great a sacrament except by the Spirit of God working invisibly, since God works all these things which are done by bodily motions in that work, moving first the invisible things of the ministers, whether the souls of men or the hidden services of spirits subject to Him;
因為我們既不將他的舌頭、也不將羊皮紙與墨水、也不將舌頭所發出有意義的聲音、也不將寫在小皮片上的字母記號,稱為基督的身體與血;乃惟獨將那取自地上果實、藉奧祕的禱告而被祝聖之物,我們按禮領受,以致屬靈的救恩,為記念主為我們受難之事——這物雖藉人手被帶至那可見的形狀,卻惟有藉神的靈不可見地運作,才被祝聖為如此偉大的聖禮;因為在那工作中凡藉身體運動所行的一切,都是神所運作的,祂首先推動那些僕役中不可見之物,無論是人的魂,或服屬於祂之眾靈隱密的服事;
26:28
quid mirum si etiam in creatura caeli et terrae, maris et aeris, facit deus quae uult sensibilia atque uisibilia ad se ipsum in eis sicut oportere ipse nouit significandum et demonstrandum, non ipsa sua qua est apparente substantia quae omnino incommutabiliis est omnibusque spiritibus quos creauit interius secretiusque sublimior? [V 11] Vi enim diuina totam spiritalem corporalemque administrante creaturam omnium annorum certis diebus aduocantur aquae maris et effunduntur super faciem terrae.
what wonder is it if also in the creature of heaven and earth, of sea and air, God works what He wills — things sensible and visible, for the signifying and showing of Himself in them as He Himself knows it ought to be done — not by that substance of His own whereby He is appearing, which is altogether unchangeable and more inwardly and secretly sublime than all the spirits He created? For by the divine power administering the whole spiritual and bodily creation, on certain days of every year the waters of the sea are summoned and poured out over the face of the earth.
那麼,倘若在天與地、海與空氣的受造物中,神也隨其所願,行出可感可見之事——為著在其中表明並顯示祂自己,照祂自己所知當如何行——並非藉祂那本相顯現的本體(那本體全然不變,且比祂所造的一切靈更內在、更隱密、更崇高)——這又有何可希奇的呢?因為藉著治理整個屬靈與屬身體之受造界的神聖能力,每年在特定的日子,海的眾水被召喚,傾倒在地面上。
26:29
Sed cum hoc orante sancto Helia factum est quia praecesserat tam continua et tam longa serenitas ut fame deficerent homines, nec ea hora qua ille dei seruus orauit aer ipse aliqua humida facie mox futurae pluuiae signa praetulerat, consecutis tantis et tam uelociter imbribus apparuit uis diuina quibus illud dispensabatur dabaturque miraculum. Ita deus operatur solemnia fulgura atque tonitrua. Sed quia in monte Sina inusitato modo fiebant uocesque illae non strepitu confuso edebantur sed eis quaedam signa dari certissimis indiciis apparebat, miracula erant. Quis attrahit humorem per radicem uitis ad botrum et uinum facit nisi deus qui et homine plantante et rigante incrementum dat?
But when this happened at the prayer of holy Elijah — because there had preceded so continuous and so long a fair weather that men were failing from famine, nor at the very hour when that servant of God prayed had the air itself borne any moist appearance as a sign of rain soon to come — when such great and so swiftly following downpours ensued, the divine power appeared, by which that miracle was dispensed and granted. Thus God works the ordinary lightnings and thunders. But because on Mount Sinai they were happening in an unusual manner, and those voices were uttered not with a confused din, but it appeared by most certain indications that certain signs were being given by them, they were miracles. Who draws the moisture through the root of the vine to the grape-cluster and makes wine, but God, who gives the increase even while man plants and waters?
但當此事因聖者以利亞的禱告而發生時——因先前有如此連綿而漫長的晴朗天氣,以致人因饑荒而衰弱,且在那神的僕人禱告的那一刻,天空本身也未顯出任何濕潤之象作為即將降雨的預兆——當如此浩大且如此迅速接踵而至的傾盆大雨隨之而來時,那分配並賜下此神蹟的神聖能力便顯明了。神就是這樣行出尋常的閃電與雷轟。但因在西奈山上,它們是以不尋常的方式發生,且那些聲音並非以混雜的喧響發出,而是藉極確鑿的跡象顯明有某些信息藉它們傳達,它們便是神蹟。誰藉葡萄樹的根汲取水分至葡萄串而造出酒來呢?豈不是神嗎?就是那位在人栽種、澆灌之時賜生長的神。
26:30
Sed cum ad nutum domini aqua in uinum inuisitata celeritate conuersa est, etiam stultis fatentibus uis diuina declarata est. Quis arbusta fronde ac flore solemniter uestit nisi deus? Verum cum floruit uirga sacerdotis Aaron, conlocuta est quodam modo cum dubitante humanitate diuinitas. Et lignis certe omnibus et omnium animalium carnibus gignendis atque formandis communis est terrena materies, et quis ea facit nisi qui dixit ut haec terra produceret et in eodem uerbo suo quae creauit regit atque agit? Sed cum eandem materiam ex uirga Moysi in carnem serpentis proxime ac uelociter uertit, miraculum fuit, rei quidem mutabilis sed tamen inusitata mutatio.
But when at the Lord's nod water was turned into wine with unwonted swiftness, the divine power was declared, even the foolish confessing it. Who solemnly clothes the shrubs with leaf and flower, but God? Yet when the priestly rod of Aaron flowered, the divinity conversed in a certain manner with doubting humanity. And certainly, for the begetting and forming of all woods and of the flesh of all animals, the earthly matter is common; and who makes these things, but He who said that this earth should bring them forth, and by that same word of His governs and drives what He created? But when He turned that same matter, from the rod of Moses, into the flesh of a serpent, closely and swiftly, it was a miracle — a change indeed of a changeable thing, yet an unwonted one.
但當因主的示意、水以不尋常的迅捷變為酒時,神聖的能力便被宣告了,連愚昧人也承認它。誰以葉與花按時給灌木披上衣裳呢?豈不是神嗎?然而當亞倫祭司的杖發了芽時,神性便以某種方式與存疑的人性交談了。誠然,為著生成並形塑一切樹木及一切動物的肉體,那屬土的質料乃是共通的;而造這些之物者,豈不正是那說「這地要生出這些」、並以祂那同一之道治理並推動祂所造之物者嗎?但當祂將那同一質料,從摩西的杖,就近而迅速地變為蛇的肉體時,那便是神蹟——確是可變之物的一種變化,卻是不尋常的變化。
26:31
Quis autem animat quaeque uiua nascentia nisi qui et illum serpentem ad horam sicut opus fuerat animauit? [VI] Et quis reddidit cadaueribus animas suas cum resurgerent mortui nisi qui animat carnes in uteris matrum ut oriantur morituri? Sed cum fiunt illa continuato quasi quodam fluuio labentium manantiumque rerum et ex occulto in promptum atque ex prompto in occultum usitato itinere transeuntium, naturalia dicuntur; cum uero admonendis hominibus inusitata mutabilitate ingeruntur, magnalia nominantur. [VII 12] Hic uideo quid infirmae cogitationi possit occurrere, cur scilicet ista miracula etiam magicis artibus fiant. Nam et magi pharaonis similiter serpentes fecerunt et alia similia.
But who gives life to each living thing at its birth, save he who also for that hour gave life to that serpent, just as the work required? And who restored to the corpses their own souls when the dead rose again, save he who gives life to flesh in the wombs of mothers, that they may be born who are destined to die? Yet when these things come to pass by a certain continuous flow, as it were, of things slipping and streaming past, passing from the hidden into the open and from the open into the hidden by their accustomed course, they are called natural; but when, for the admonishing of men, they are pressed upon us with an unaccustomed mutability, they are named mighty works. Here I see what may occur to a weak understanding, namely, why these miracles should also be wrought by magic arts. For the magicians of Pharaoh likewise made serpents and other like things.
然而,是誰使每一個活物在出生時得生命呢?豈不是那位按當時工作所需,也一度使那條蛇活過來的主嗎?當死人復活、屍體重得其靈魂時,是誰使之復生呢?豈不是那位在母腹中使肉體得生命、叫那些注定要死的人得以出生的主嗎?然而,當這些事像一道連續不斷的水流般發生,如同萬物滑逝流淌、從隱藏進入顯明、又從顯明歸入隱藏、依其慣常之途而行時,便被稱為自然之事;但當它們為警戒世人,以不尋常的變化加諸我們時,便被稱為大能奇事。在此我看見軟弱的思想可能生出的疑難,就是:這些神蹟為何連藉魔法邪術也能行出來。因為法老的術士也照樣造出蛇及其他類似之物。
26:32
Sed illud amplius est admirandum quomodo magorum illa potentia quae serpentes facere potuit ubi ad muscas minutissimas uentum est omnino defecit. Scinifes enim musculae sunt breuissimae qua tertia plaga superbus aegyptius populus caedebatur. Ibi certe deficientes magi dixerunt: Digitus dei est hoc. Vnde intellegi datur ne ipsos quidem transgressores angelos et aerias potestates in imam istam caliginem tamquam in sui generis carcerem ab illius sublimis aetheriae puritatis habitatione detrusas, per quas magicae artes possunt quidquid possunt, ualere aliquid nisi data desuper potestate.
But this is the more to be marveled at: how that power of the magicians, which was able to make serpents, utterly failed when it came to the tiniest of flies. For the sciniphes are the smallest of little gnats, by which as a third plague the proud Egyptian people were smitten. There indeed the magicians, failing, said: 'This is the finger of God.' Whence we are given to understand that not even those transgressor angels and airy powers—thrust down into this lowest darkness as into a prison of their own kind, from that dwelling of the sublime, ethereal purity, and through whom the magic arts can do whatever they can do—have any power at all except by power granted from above.
但更值得驚異的是:術士那能造出蛇的能力,一到那最微小的蒼蠅面前,竟完全失效了。因為那「蚋」乃是最微小的小蚊蟲,驕傲的埃及百姓正是被牠作為第三災所擊打。就在那裡,術士無能為力,說:「這是神的手指。」由此我們得以明白:連那些悖逆的天使和空中的權勢——他們從那崇高、以太般潔淨的居所被貶落到這最底層的幽暗中,如同關進與其同類相配的監牢,魔法邪術也正是藉他們才能行其所能行之事——若非有從上面所賜的權柄,也絲毫不能作甚麼。
26:33
Datur autem uel ad fallendos fallaces sicut in aegyptios et in ipsos etiam magos data est ut in eorum spirituum seductione uiderentur admirandi a quibus fiebant, a dei ueritate damnandi; uel ad admonendos fideles ne tale aliquid facere pro magno desiderent, propter quod etiam nobis scripturae auctoritate sunt prodita; uel ad exercendam probandam manifestandamque iustorum patientiam. Neque enim parua uisibilium miraculorum potentia Iob cuncta quae habebat amisit et filios et ipsam corporis sanitatem.
And this power is granted either to deceive the deceitful, as it was granted against the Egyptians and even against the magicians themselves, so that in the seduction of those spirits they might seem admirable to those by whom the works were done, while being condemned by the truth of God; or to admonish the faithful not to desire to do any such thing as a great matter—for which reason these things too have been handed down to us by the authority of Scripture; or to exercise, prove, and make manifest the patience of the just. For it was by no small power over visible things that Job lost all that he had, both his sons and the very health of his body.
這權柄之所以被賜下,或是為了欺哄那些行詭詐的,正如它被賜下對付埃及人、甚至對付術士自己,好叫他們在那些邪靈的迷惑中,在行奇事之人眼中顯為可欽佩,卻被神的真理所定罪;或是為了警戒信徒,不要把行這樣的事當作大事來貪求——正因如此,這些事才藉聖經的權威傳給了我們;或是為了操練、試驗並彰顯義人的忍耐。因為約伯正是被那不算小的、掌管有形之物的能力,喪失了他所有的一切,連同他的兒女和他身體的健康。
26:34
[VIII 13] Nec ideo putandum est istis transgressoribus angelis ad nutum seruire hanc uisibilium rerum materiam, sed deo potius a quo haec potestas datur quantum in sublimi et spiritali sede incommutabilis iudicat. Nam et damnatis iniquis etiam in metallo seruit aqua et ignis et terra ut faciant inde quod uolunt, sed quantum sinitur. Nec sane creatores illi mali angeli dicendi sunt quia per illos magi resistentes famulo dei ranas et serpentes fecerunt; non enim eas ipsi creauerunt. Omnium quippe rerum quae corporaliter uisibiliterque nascuntur occulta quaedam semina in istis corporeis mundi huius elementis latent. Alia sunt enim haec iam conspicua oculis nostris ex fructibus et animantibus;
Nor is it therefore to be supposed that this matter of visible things serves those transgressor angels at their nod, but rather God, by whom this power is granted so far as, in his sublime and spiritual and unchangeable seat, he judges fit. For to the condemned wicked, even in the mine, water and fire and earth serve, that they may make thereof what they will—yet only so far as it is permitted. Nor indeed are those evil angels to be called creators because through them the magicians, resisting the servant of God, made frogs and serpents; for they did not themselves create these. For of all things that are born corporeally and visibly, certain hidden seeds lie concealed in these bodily elements of this world. These are one thing—already visible to our eyes in fruits and living creatures;
因此不可以為這有形之物的質料是任那些悖逆的天使一點頭便役使的,其實是役使於神,權柄乃是由祂所賜,賜到祂在那崇高、屬靈、不變的寶座上所判定的分量。因為就連對那些被定罪的惡人,即便在礦坑中,水、火、土也都服事他們,任他們以之作所欲之事——但也只到蒙准許的地步為止。那些惡天使也絕不可稱為造物者,僅因術士藉他們抗拒神的僕人而造出青蛙和蛇;因為並不是他們自己造出這些的。原來,凡有形可見地出生的萬物,都有某些隱藏的種子潛藏在這世界的形質元素之中。這是一類——已顯明在我們眼前,見於果實與活物之中;
26:35
alia uero illa occulta istorum seminum semina unde iubente creatore produxit aqua prima natatilia et uolatilia, terra autem prima germina et prima sui generis animalia. Neque enim tunc in huiuscemodi fetus ita producta sunt ut in eis quae producta sunt uis illa consumpta sit, sed plerumque desunt congruae temperamentorum occasiones quibus erumpant et species suas peragant. Ecce enim breuissimus surculus semen est; nam conuenienter mandatus terrae arborem facit. Huius autem surculi subtilius semen aliquod eiusdem generis granum est et huc usque nobis uisibile.
but another thing are those hidden seeds of these seeds, from which, at the Creator's command, the waters first brought forth the swimming and flying creatures, and the earth first brought forth its shoots and the first living things of their kind. For they were not then so produced into offspring of this sort that in the things produced that power was consumed; but for the most part the fitting occasions of the temperatures are wanting whereby they might break forth and carry out their species. For behold, the tiniest twig is a seed; for, suitably committed to the earth, it makes a tree. But a subtler seed of this twig is some grain of the same kind, and thus far it is visible to us.
但另有一類,乃是這些種子的那些隱藏之種子,造物主一命令,水便先造出游行與飛翔之物,地也先造出草木及各從其類的最初活物。因為它們當時並非如此被產生為此類後裔,以致那能力在所產生之物中就此耗盡;乃是那使它們得以萌發並成全其種類的合宜之調配時機,多半尚缺。看哪,那最小的枝條就是種子;因為適當地栽入地中,它便長成一棵樹。而這枝條更精微的種子,乃是同類的某種顆粒,如此程度尚為我們所見。
26:36
Iam uero huius etiam grani semen quamuis oculis uidere nequeamus, ratione tamen conicere possumus quia nisi talis aliqua uis esset in istis elementis, non plerumque nascerentur ex terra quae ibi seminata non essent, nec animalia tam multa nulla marium feminarumque commixtione praecedente siue in terra siue in aqua, quae tamen crescunt et coeundo alia pariunt, cum illa nullis coeuntibus parentibus orta sint. Et certe apes semina filiorum non coeundo concipiunt sed tamquam sparsa per terras ore colligunt.
But now the seed even of this grain, though we cannot see it with our eyes, we can nevertheless conjecture by reason; for unless there were some such power in these elements, there would not for the most part be born from the earth things that had not been sown there, nor so many animals with no prior mingling of male and female, whether in earth or in water, which yet grow and by coupling bring forth others, though they themselves arose from no coupling parents. And certainly bees do not conceive the seeds of their offspring by coupling, but gather them with their mouth, as though scattered abroad over the lands.
至於這顆粒的種子,雖然我們肉眼看不見,卻仍能憑理性推想;因為若在這些元素中沒有某種這樣的能力,就不會多半有從未撒種其中之物由地生出,也不會有那麼多動物,無論在地上或水中,先前並無雌雄交合便得產生,牠們卻能生長,並藉交配生出別的,儘管牠們自己乃是無交合的親代而生。蜜蜂當然也不是藉交配孕育其子的種子,而是用口採集,彷彿那些種子散布在各地一般。
26:37
Inuisibilium enim seminum creator ipse creator est omnium rerum quoniam quaecumque nascendo ad oculos nostros exeunt ex occultis seminibus accipiunt progrediendi primordia et incrementa debitae magnitudinis distinctionesque formarum ab originalibus tamquam regulis sumunt.
For the Creator of the invisible seeds is himself the Creator of all things, since whatever things by being born come forth to our eyes receive from hidden seeds the beginnings of their coming-forth, and take their increases of due magnitude and the distinctions of their forms from those original, as it were, rules.
因為那不可見之種子的造物主,正是萬物的造物主,因為凡藉出生而顯露於我們眼前之物,都從隱藏的種子領受了其發育的起始,並從那些彷彿原初的規則中,取得其應有大小的增長以及各形態的區分。
26:38
Sicut ergo nec parentes dicimus creatores hominum nec agricolas creatores frugum, quamuis eorum extrinsecus adhibitis motibus ista creanda dei uirtus interius operetur, ita non solum malos sed nec bonos angelos fas est putare creatores si pro subtilitate sui sensus et corporis semina rerum istarum nobis occultiora nouerunt et ea per congruas temperationes elementorum latenter spargunt atque ita et gignendarum rerum et accelerandorum incrementorum praebent occasiones. Sed nec boni haec nisi quantum deus iubet, nec mali haec iniuste faciunt nisi quantum iuste ipse permittit. Nam iniqui malitia uoluntatem suam habent iniustam;
Just as, therefore, we do not call parents the creators of men, nor farmers the creators of the crops—although it is by their motions applied from without that God's inward power works to create these things—so it is not lawful to think either the evil angels, or even the good angels, creators, if by the subtlety of their sense and body they have come to know the seeds of these things, more hidden to us, and secretly scatter them through fitting temperings of the elements, and thus afford occasions both for the generating of things and for the hastening of their increases. But neither do the good do these things except so far as God commands, nor do the evil do them unjustly except so far as he himself justly permits. For the wicked have in their malice a will that is unjust;
所以,正如我們不稱父母為人的造物者,也不稱農夫為莊稼的造物者——雖然神那內在的能力,正是藉他們從外部所施的動作,在內裡運行造成這些——照樣,無論是惡天使或善天使,都不可視為造物者,即便他們憑其感官與身體的精微,得知這些對我們較為隱蔽的萬物種子,並藉元素的合宜調配隱秘地將之散布,因而為萬物的生成及增長的加速提供時機。然而善天使行這些事,也不過在神所命令的分量之內;惡天使行這些事而非義,也不過在神自己所公義許可的分量之內。因為不義之人在其惡毒中,存著不義的意志;
26:39
potestatem autem non nisi iuste accipiunt siue ad suam poenam siue ad aliorum uel poenam malorum uel laudem bonorum. Itaque apostolus discernens interius deum creantem atque formantem ab operibus creaturae quae admouentur extrinsecus et de agricultura similitudinem assumens ait: Ego plantaui, Apollo rigauit, sed deus incrementum dedit. Sicut ergo in ipsa uita nostra mentem iustificando formare non potest nisi deus, praedicare autem extrinsecus euangelium et homines possunt non solum boni per ueritatem sed etiam mali per occasionem;
but power they receive only justly, whether for their own punishment, or for the punishment of others among the wicked, or for the praise of the good. And so the Apostle, distinguishing the God who inwardly creates and forms from the works of the creature which are applied from without, and taking a similitude from agriculture, says: 'I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the increase.' Just as, therefore, in our very life it is God alone who can form the mind by justifying it, but to preach the Gospel outwardly men also can do—not only the good through the truth, but even the evil through occasion;
但他們領受權柄,卻只在公義之中,或為他們自己的刑罰,或為惡人中他者的刑罰,或為善人得稱讚。因此使徒為要把那位在內裡創造並塑造的神,與那從外部施加的受造之工分別開來,便取農耕為喻,說:「我栽種了,亞波羅澆灌了,惟有神叫他生長。」所以,正如在我們的生命本身,惟有神能藉稱義來塑造心靈,然而在外面傳福音則人也能作——不僅善人藉真理而傳,連惡人也藉時機而傳;
26:40
ita creationem rerum uisibilium deus interius operatur, exteriores autem operationes siue bonorum siue malorum uel angelorum uel hominum, siue etiam quorumcumque animalium, secundum imperium suum et a se impertitas distributiones potestatum et appetitiones commoditatum ita rerum naturae adhibet in qua creat omnia quemadmodum terrae agriculturam. Quapropter ita non possum dicere angelos malos magicis artibus euocatos creatores fuisse ranarum atque serpentium, sicut non possum dicere homines malos segetis esse creatores quam per eorum operam uidero exortam. Sicut nec Iacob creator colorum in pecoribus fuit quia bibentibus in conceptu matribus uariatas uirgas quas intuerentur apposuit.
so God inwardly works the creation of visible things, but the outward operations—whether of good or of evil angels or men, or even of whatever animals—according to his command and the distributions of powers imparted by him and the appetites for advantages, he thus applies to the nature of things, in which he creates all things, even as he applies the tillage to the land. Wherefore I can no more say that the evil angels summoned by magic arts were the creators of frogs and serpents than I can say that evil men are the creators of the crop which I shall have seen springing up by their labor. Just as neither was Jacob the creator of the colors in the flocks, because he set before the mothers, as they drank at conception, the variegated rods for them to gaze upon.
照樣,神在內裡運行造成有形之物的受造,至於外部的運作——無論是善或惡的天使或人,甚或任何動物的運作——祂都按其命令、按祂所分賜的權能之分配以及對益處的欲求,如此施用於萬物的本性(祂正是在其中創造萬有),正如祂把耕作施於土地。因此,我既不能說藉魔法邪術所召來的惡天使乃是青蛙與蛇的造物者,正如我也不能說我看見藉惡人之勞作而發芽長出的莊稼、其造物者乃是那些惡人。正如雅各也不是那羊群花色的造物者,僅因他在羊群受孕飲水之時,把有斑紋的枝子擺在牠們眼前供其注視。
26:41
Sed nec ipsae pecudes creatrices fuerunt uarietatis prolis suae quia inhaeserat animae illarum discolor phantasia ex contuitu uariarum uirgarum per oculos impressa, quae non potuit nisi corpus quod sic affecto spiritu animabatur ex compassione commixtionis afficere unde teneris fetuum primordiis colore tenus aspergeretur. Vt enim sic ex semetipsis afficiantur uel anima ex corpore uel corpus ex anima, congruentiae rationis id faciunt quae incommutabiliter uiuunt in ipsa summa dei sapientia quam nulla spatia locorum capiunt; et cum sit ipsa incommutabilis, nihil eorum quae uel mutabiliter sunt deserit quia nihil eorum nisi per ipsam creatum est.
But neither were the flocks themselves the creators of the variegation of their own offspring, because there had clung to their soul a many-colored fancy, impressed through the eyes from the sight of the variegated rods—a fancy which could affect nothing except the body, which was animated by the spirit so affected, through a sympathy of their commingling, whence the tender beginnings of the young might be tinged, as far as color, with it. For that they should be thus affected from themselves—either the soul from the body or the body from the soul—the fittingnesses of reason bring this about, which live unchangeably in that supreme Wisdom of God whom no spaces of places contain; and while it is itself unchangeable, it forsakes none of the things that exist even changeably, because none of them has been created except through it.
但羊群自己也不是其後裔花色的造物者,僅因牠們的魂裡黏附了一種多彩的幻象,是透過眼睛從注視斑紋枝子而印入的——這幻象所能影響的,唯有那被如此受動之靈所賦予生命的身體,藉著彼此交合的相感,使胎兒柔嫩的起始得以在顏色上被此染上。因為它們竟能如此彼此受動——或魂受動於身,或身受動於魂——乃是理性的合宜關係促成的,這些關係不變地存於神那至高的智慧之中,並無地方的空間能容納祂;祂本身雖不變,卻不撇棄任何存在之物,即便是那些變動地存在之物,因為其中沒有一樣不是藉祂而受造的。
26:42
Vt enim de pecoribus non uirgae sed pecora nascerentur, fecit hoc incommutabilis et inuisibilis ratio sapientiae dei per quam creata sunt omnia; ut autem de uarietate uirgarum pecorum conceptorum color aliquid duceret, fecit hoc anima grauidae pecudis per oculos affecta forinsecus et interius secum pro suo modulo formandi regulam trahens quam de intima potentia sui creatoris accepit.
For that from the flocks not rods but flocks should be born, this the unchangeable and invisible reason of the Wisdom of God brought about, through which all things were created; but that from the variegation of the rods the color of the conceived flocks should draw something, this the soul of the pregnant beast brought about, affected outwardly through the eyes and inwardly drawing with it, according to its own measure, a rule of forming which it had received from the innermost power of its Creator.
因為羊群所生的乃是羊群而非枝子,這是神智慧那不變且不可見的理性所促成,萬物都是藉祂而受造的;至於受孕羊群的顏色竟從枝子的斑紋汲取了些甚麼,這是那受孕之獸的魂所促成,牠從外部藉眼睛受動,又在內裡按自己的分量帶著一種塑造的規則,那規則是牠從其造物主至內在的能力領受來的。
next part →
← ch. 25ch. 27 →
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344

Tell me when new readings are published

One email per new chapter reading. Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe.