📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Works (City of God, On the Trinity, etc.)

Augustine of Hippo

Works (City of God, On the Trinity, etc.) 3 part 3/4

Latin original · 39 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 3:83–3:121 (123 verses in all)

← ch. 2ch. 4 →
← prev partnext part →
3:83
quae si diffamata et praeualescente religione Christiana sentirentur atque dicerentur, quis non istorum ea Christianis inputanda esse censeret? Quam ob rem cur non curarunt dii eorum, ne tunc periret atque amitteretur illa res publica, quam Cicero longe, antequam Christus in carne uenisset, tam lugubriter deplorat amissam? Viderint laudatores eius etiam illis antiquis uiris et moribus qualis fuerit, utrum in ea uiguerit uera iustitia an forte nec tunc fuerit uiua moribus, sed picta coloribus; quod et ipse Cicero nesciens, cum eam praeferret, expressit. Sed alias, si Dneus uoluerit, hoc uidebimus.
and if these things had been felt and spoken when the Christian religion was being defamed and gaining strength, who among these men would not have judged that they ought to be laid to the charge of the Christians? Wherefore, why did their gods not take care that the commonwealth should not then perish and be lost—that commonwealth which Cicero, long before Christ had come in the flesh, so mournfully laments as already lost? Let its praisers see, even in respect of those ancient men and morals, what its character was: whether true justice flourished in it, or whether even then it was not alive in its morals but only painted in colours—which Cicero himself, unknowingly, expressed even while he preferred it. But we shall look into this elsewhere, if God shall so will.
倘若這些話語是在基督教遭誹謗而日漸壯大之時被人感受並說出的,那些人中有誰不會判定應把這些歸咎於基督徒呢?因此,他們的諸神為何不照管,使那共和國在當時不致滅亡喪失呢?——那共和國,西塞羅早在基督成肉身降臨之前,就已如此哀慟地悲嘆它喪失了。讓那些讚美它的人自己去看,即便就那些古人與古風而言,它究竟是何等模樣:其中是否有真正的公義興盛,抑或即便那時它在風俗上也並非活生生地存在,而不過是用顏料描畫出來的——這一點連西塞羅自己也在推崇它的同時,不自覺地表達了出來。但這一點,若神願意,我們將在別處再加考察。
3:84
Enitar enim suo loco, ut ostendam secundum definitiones ipsius Ciceronis, quibus quid sit res publica et quid sit populus loquente Scipione breuiter posuit (adtestantibus etiam multis siue ipsius siue eorum quos loqui fecit in eadem disputatione sententiis), numquam illam fuisse rem publicam, quia numquam in ea fuerit uera iustitia. Secundum probabiliores autem definitiones pro suo modo quodam res publica fuit, et melius ab antiquioribus Romanis quam a posterioribus administrata est; uera autem iustitia non est nisi in ea re publica, cuius conditor rectorque Christus est, si et ipsam rem publicam placet dicere, quoniam eam rem populi esse negare non possumus.
For I shall strive in its proper place to show, according to the very definitions of Cicero—by which, through the mouth of Scipio, he briefly set down what a commonwealth is and what a people is (with many statements bearing witness, whether his own or those of the men whom he made to speak in the same debate)—that it never was a commonwealth, because true justice never existed in it. According to more probable definitions, however, it was in a certain way of its own a commonwealth, and it was better administered by the earlier Romans than by the later ones; but true justice exists only in that commonwealth whose founder and ruler is Christ—if indeed it be pleasing to call that too a commonwealth, since we cannot deny that it is the affair of a people.
因為我將在適當之處竭力證明:按照西塞羅本人的定義(他藉西庇阿之口簡要陳述了何為共和國、何為人民,並有許多論斷為證,無論是他自己的,還是他讓別人在同一場論辯中所說的),羅馬從來就不是一個真正的共和國,因為其中從未有過真正的公義。然而,按照那些較為可取的定義,它以自己某種方式確曾是個共和國,而且由早期的羅馬人治理得比後來者更好;但真正的公義只存在於那共和國之中,其創建者與統治者乃是基督——倘若也樂意稱它為共和國,因為我們無法否認它是人民之事。
3:85
Si autem hoc nomen, quod alibi aliterque uulgatum est, ab usu nostrae locutionis est forte remotius, in ea certe ciuitate est uera iustitia, de qua scriptura sancta dicit: Gloriosa dicta sunt de te, ciuitas Dei. [XXII] Sed quod pertinet ad praesentem quaestionem, quamlibet laudabilem dicant istam fuisse uel esse rem publicam, secundum eorum auctores doctissimos iam longe ante Christi aduentum pessima ac f lagitio s issima facta erat; immo uero nulla erat atque omnino perierat perditissimis moribus.
But if this name, which elsewhere and in another sense is in common use, is perhaps too remote from the usage of our own speech, at all events in that city there is true justice, of which the holy Scripture says: Glorious things are spoken of thee, O city of God. But as concerns the present question, however praiseworthy they may say that commonwealth to have been or to be, according to their own most learned authors it had long before the coming of Christ become most wicked and most disgraceful; nay rather, it was no commonwealth at all and had utterly perished through most abandoned morals.
但倘若這名稱——它在別處、以另一種意義被普遍使用——或許與我們自己言談的用法相去太遠,那麼至少在那城中確有真正的公義,論到這城,聖經說:『神的城啊,有榮耀的事乃指著你說的。』至於就當前的問題而言,無論他們如何稱讚那共和國過去或現今是何等值得誇讚,按照他們自己最有學問的著作家所言,它早在基督降臨之前就已變得極其邪惡、極其可恥;不,更確切地說,它根本已不成其為共和國,並因最墮落的風俗而徹底毀滅了。
3:86
Vt ergo non periret, dii custodes eius populo cultori suo dare praecipue uitae ac morum praecepta debuerunt, a quo tot templis, tot sacerdotibus et sacrificiorum generibus, tam multiplicibus uariisque sacris, tot festis sollemnitatibus, tot tantorumque ludorum celebritatibus colebantur; ubi nihil daemones nisi negotium suum egerunt, non curantes quem ad modum illi uiuerent, immo curantes ut etiam perdite uiuerent, dum tamen honori suo illa omnia metu subditi ministrarent.
In order, then, that it might not perish, its guardian gods ought above all to have given to their worshipping people precepts of life and morals—that people by which they were worshipped with so many temples, so many priests and kinds of sacrifices, with rites so manifold and various, with so many festal solemnities, with so many celebrations of games so great. But there the demons did nothing except their own business, not caring how those men lived—nay, taking care that they should live even in utter ruin—provided only that all those things were rendered to their honour by men subdued through fear.
因此,為使它不致滅亡,那些守護神本應首先賜給敬拜它們的子民關於生活與品行的訓誡——就是那用如此眾多的廟宇、如此眾多的祭司與各類祭祀、如此繁複多樣的聖禮、如此眾多的節慶盛典、如此眾多而盛大的競技慶典來敬拜它們的子民。然而在那裡,這些邪魔除了辦它們自己的勾當之外,別無所為,全不顧那些人如何生活——不,反倒巴不得他們活得徹底墮落——只要那一切在恐懼中被馴服的人肯將這些事奉獻給它們的尊榮就好。
3:87
Aut si dederunt, proferatur ostendatur legatur, quas deorum leges illi ciuitati datas contempserint Gracchi, ut seditionibus cuncta turbarent, quas Marius et Cinna et Carbo, ut in bella etiam progrederentur ciuilia causis iniquissimis suscepta et crudeliter gesta crudeliusque finita, quas denique SmIa ipse, cuius uitam mores facta describente Sallustio aliisque scriptoribus historiae quis non exhorreat? quis illam rem publicam non tunc perisse fateatur? An forte propter huiusce modi ciuium mores ¡Vergilianam illam sententiam, sicut solent, pro defensione deorum suorum opponere audebunt: Discessere omnes adytis arisque relictis Di, quibus imperium hoc steterat?
Or if they did give such precepts, let it be produced, shown, and read—what laws of the gods, given to that city, the Gracchi despised, so as to throw everything into confusion by sedition; what laws Marius and Cinna and Carbo despised, so as to proceed even into civil wars undertaken on the most unjust grounds and waged cruelly and ended more cruelly still; what laws, finally, Sulla himself despised—whose life, morals, and deeds, as described by Sallust and other writers of history, who would not shudder at? Who would not confess that the commonwealth had then perished? Or will they perhaps dare, as they are wont, to bring forward against us, in defence of their gods, that Virgilian saying on account of such morals of the citizens: 'All the gods departed, forsaking their shrines and altars—the gods by whom this empire had stood'?
或者,如果它們曾賜下這樣的訓誡,那就把它拿出來、展示出來、宣讀出來——看格拉古兄弟究竟藐視了諸神賜給那城的哪些律法,以致藉暴亂攪亂了一切;看馬略、秦納和卡爾波藐視了哪些律法,以致竟因最不義的緣由發動、殘忍地進行、更殘忍地結束的內戰;最後,看蘇拉本人藐視了哪些律法——他的生平、品行與行徑,經撒路斯提烏斯及其他史家所描述,有誰不會為之戰慄?有誰不承認共和國在那時就已滅亡?抑或他們或許會如慣常那樣,膽敢為捍衛他們的諸神、以那些公民如此的品行為由,援引維吉爾那句話來反駁我們:『眾神皆已離去,棄下神龕與祭壇——就是那使此帝國得以屹立的諸神』?
3:88
Primum si ita est, non habent cur querantur de religione Christiana, quod hac offensi eos dii sui deseruerint, quoniam quidem maiores eorum iam pridem moribus suis ab Vrbis altaribus tam multos ac minutos deos tamquam muscas abegerunt. Sed tamen haec numinum turba ubi erat, cum longe antequam mores corrumperentur antiqui a Gallis Roma capta et incensa est? An praesentes forte dormiebant? Tunc enim tota Vrbe in hostium potestatem redacta solus collis Capitolinus remanserat, qui etiam ipse caperetur, nisi saltem anseres diis dormientibus uigilarent. Vnde paene in superstitionem Aegyptiorum bestias auesque colentium Roma deciderat, cum anseri sollemnia celebrabant.
First, if it is so, they have no reason to complain of the Christian religion, as though, offended by it, their gods had deserted them; for their ancestors had long ago, by their own morals, driven so many petty gods, like flies, from the altars of the City. But yet, where was that throng of deities when, long before the ancient morals were corrupted, Rome was captured and burned by the Gauls? Were they perhaps present but asleep? For then, when the whole City had been reduced into the enemy's power, only the Capitoline hill remained, and even that would have been taken, had not the geese at least kept watch while the gods slept. Whence Rome had almost fallen into the superstition of the Egyptians who worship beasts and birds, when they celebrated solemnities in honour of a goose.
首先,倘若真是如此,他們就沒有理由抱怨基督教,彷彿諸神因它冒犯而離棄了他們;因為他們的祖先早已憑自己的品行,把那麼多細小的神祇像趕蒼蠅一樣從羅馬城的祭壇上驅走了。然而,當羅馬早在古風敗壞之前就被高盧人攻陷焚燒之時,這一大群神明又在哪裡呢?難道它們雖在場卻正睡著?因為那時整座城已淪入敵人之手,唯獨卡皮托利丘尚存,而連這丘也險些被攻取,若不是至少有幾隻鵝在諸神沉睡時警醒守望的話。由此羅馬幾乎陷入了埃及人崇拜獸鳥的迷信,因為他們竟為一隻鵝舉行盛大慶典。
3:89
Verum de his aduenticiis et corporis potius quam animi malis, quae uel ab hostibus uel alia clade accidunt, nondum interim disputo: nunc ago de labe morum, quibus primum paulatim decoloratis, deinde torrentis modo praecipitatis tanta quamuis integris tectis moenibusque facta est ruina rei publicae, ut magni auctores eorum eam tunc amissam non dubitent dicere. Recte autem abscesserant, ut amitteretur, omnes adytis arisque relictis di, si eorum de bona uita atque iustitia ciuitas praecepta contempserat. Nunc uero quales, quaeso, dii fuerunt, si noluerunt cum populo cultore suo uiuere, quem male uiuentem non docuerant bene uiuere?
But of these external evils, evils rather of the body than of the mind, which befall either from enemies or from some other calamity, I do not yet for the present dispute: now I treat of the ruin of morals, by which—first gradually discoloured, then hurled headlong like a torrent—so great a downfall of the commonwealth was brought about, that (though roofs and walls remained intact) their great authors do not hesitate to say it was then lost. And rightly had all the gods departed, forsaking their shrines and altars, so that it might be lost, if the city had despised their precepts concerning a good life and justice. But now, I ask, what sort of gods were these, if they were unwilling to live with their worshipping people, whom, when they lived wickedly, they had not taught to live well?
但關於這些來自外部的、與其說是心靈之惡不如說是身體之惡——就是那由敵人或別的災難所帶來的禍患——我暫且還不辯論;如今我要論的是品行的敗壞。正是由此敗壞,共和國先是漸漸失色,繼而如洪流般一瀉千里,招致了如此巨大的傾覆,以至於(縱然屋頂與城牆完好無損)他們的大著作家也毫不遲疑地說它那時已然喪失。倘若那城藐視了諸神關於良善生活與公義的訓誡,那麼眾神理當離去、棄下神龕與祭壇,好叫它滅亡。但如今我要問:這些神究竟是何等的神,若它們不肯與敬拜它們的子民同住,而在那子民作惡度日時,卻未曾教導他們好好生活?
3:90
[XXIII] Quid quod etiam uidentur eorum adfuisse cupiditatibus implendis, et ostenduntur non praefuisse kreVfrenandis, qui enim Marium nouum hominem et ignobilem, cruentissimum auctorem bellorum ciuilium atque gestorem, ut septiens consul fieret adiuuerunt atque ut in septimo suo consulatu moreretur, senex ne in manus Sullae futuri mox uictoris inrueret. Si enim ad haec eum dii eorum non iuuerunt, non parum est quod fatentur etiam non propitiis diis suis posse accidere homini istam temporalem, quam nimis diligunt, tantam felicitatem et posse homines, sicut fuit Marius, salute uiribus, opibus honoribus, dignitate longaeuitate cumulari et perfrui diis iratis;
Nay, why is it that they even appear to have been present to help fulfil their lusts, and are shown not to have presided over restraining them? For they aided Marius—a new man and of ignoble birth, a most bloody author and conductor of civil wars—so that he became consul seven times, and that he died in his seventh consulship as an old man, that he might not fall into the hands of Sulla, who would soon be victor. For if their gods did not help him to these ends, it is no small thing that they confess it can happen even without their gods being propitious that a man should attain that temporal happiness, so exceedingly great, which they overmuch love; and that men, such as Marius was, can be heaped up with and enjoy safety, strength, riches, honours, dignity, and length of days even when the gods are angry;
更有甚者,為何它們甚至顯得曾在場助人滿足私慾,卻顯然未曾主持約束這些私慾呢?因為它們曾幫助馬略——一個出身低微的新人,內戰最血腥的策動者與執行者——使他七度出任執政官,並使他在第七任執政官任內以老邁之年壽終,免得他落入不久將要得勝的蘇拉手中。因為倘若他們的神並未助他達成這些目的,那麼他們承認以下這一點就非同小可:即便諸神並不施恩,一個人也能獲得那他們過分珍愛、如此巨大的世俗幸福;而像馬略那樣的人,縱然諸神震怒,也能享有並飽嘗平安、力量、財富、尊榮、地位與長壽的堆積;
3:91
posse etiam homines, sicut fuit Regulus, captiuitate seruitute inopia, uigiliis doloribus excruciari et emori diis amicis. Quod si ita esse concedunt, compendio nihil eos prodesse et coli superfluo confitentur. Nam si uirtutibus animi et probitati uitae, cuius praernia post mortem speranda sunt, magis contraria ut popuIus disceret institerunt; si nihil etianI in his transeuntibus et temporalibus bonis uel eis quos oderunt nocent, uel eis quos diligunt prosunt, ut quid coluntur, ut quid tanto studio colendi requiruntur? Cur laboriosis tristibusque temporibus, tamquam offensi abscesserint, murmuratur et propter eos Christiana religio conuiciis indignissimis laeditur?
and that men, such as Regulus was, can, even when the gods are friendly, be tortured and die through captivity, slavery, want, wakeful nights, and pains. But if they grant that it is so, they confess in short that the gods profit nothing and are worshipped to no purpose. For if they insisted upon teaching the people rather the things contrary to the virtues of the soul and to uprightness of life, whose rewards are to be hoped for after death; if in these passing and temporal goods they neither harm those whom they hate nor profit those whom they love—why are they worshipped, why with such zeal are they sought to be worshipped? Why, in toilsome and gloomy times, is there murmuring, as though they had departed offended, and on their account is the Christian religion wounded with most unworthy revilings?
而像雷古盧斯那樣的人,即便諸神友善,卻也能因被擄、為奴、貧困、徹夜不眠與痛苦而受折磨、以至死亡。但倘若他們承認事情如此,他們簡而言之就是承認諸神毫無益處、對它們的敬拜也是徒然。因為,倘若它們反倒堅持要教人民那些與心靈之德、與正直生活相悖的事——而心靈之德與正直生活的賞報是死後可望得的;倘若在這些短暫而世俗的福分上,它們既不能傷害它們所恨之人,也不能造福它們所愛之人——那麼它們為何受敬拜?為何人們以如此的熱忱尋求敬拜它們?在艱難愁苦的時日,為何有人抱怨,彷彿它們因受冒犯而離去,並為它們之故用最不堪的辱罵傷害基督教?
3:92
Si autem habent in his rebus uel beneficii uel maleficii potestatem, cur in eis adfuerunt pessimo uiro Mario, et optimo Regulo defuerunt? An ex hoc ipsi intelleguntur iniustissimi et pessimi? Quod si propterea magis timendi et colendi putantur: neque hoc putentur; neque enim minus eos inuenitur ReguIus coluisse q uam M arius. Nec ideo uita pessima eligenda uideatur, quia magis Mario quam Regulo dii fauisse existimantur.
But if they do have in these matters the power of benefit or of harm, why were they present to the wicked Marius, and absent from the excellent Regulus? Or from this very fact are they understood to be most unjust and most wicked? And if for that reason they are thought the more to be feared and worshipped—let them not be thought so either; for Regulus is found to have worshipped them no less than Marius. Nor should the worst life on that account seem to be chosen, because the gods are thought to have favoured Marius more than Regulus.
但倘若它們在這些事上確有賜福或降禍的能力,為何它們臨在於邪惡的馬略身邊,卻離棄了卓越的雷古盧斯呢?抑或正由此可知它們是最不義、最邪惡的?而倘若因這緣故人們就更加畏懼、敬拜它們——這也不當如此想;因為雷古盧斯敬拜它們並不比馬略少。也不該因人們以為諸神偏愛馬略勝過雷古盧斯,就以為當選擇最邪惡的生活。
3:93
Metellus enim Romanorum laudatissimus, qui habuit quinque filios consulares, etiam rerum temporalium felix fuit, et Catilina pessimus oppressus inopia et in bello sui sceleris prostratus infelix, et uerissima atque certissima felicitate praepollent boni Deum colentes, a quo solo conferri potest. Illa igitur res publica malis moribus cum periret, nihil dii eorum pro dirigendis uel pro corrigendis egerunt moribus, ne periret; immo deprauandis et corrumpendis addiderunt moribus, ut periret. Nec se bonos fingant, quod uelut offensi ciuium iniquitate discesserint. Prorsus ibi erant; produntur, conuincuntur; nec subuenire praecipiendo nec latere tacendo potuerunt.
For Metellus, most praised among the Romans, who had five sons of consular rank, was also happy in temporal affairs; and Catiline, most wicked, oppressed by want and overthrown in the war of his own crime, was unhappy; and by the truest and most certain happiness the good who worship God are pre-eminent, by whom alone it can be bestowed. That commonwealth, therefore, when it was perishing through evil morals, its gods did nothing to direct or correct its morals so that it might not perish; nay, they added to the depraving and corrupting of its morals, so that it should perish. Nor let them feign themselves good, as though, offended by the iniquity of the citizens, they had departed. Assuredly they were there; they are betrayed, they are convicted; they could neither succour by teaching nor lie hidden by keeping silent.
因為梅特路斯——羅馬人中最受讚譽者,有五個做過執政官的兒子——在世俗之事上也是幸福的;而喀提林——最邪惡者,為貧困所困,在他自己罪行的戰爭中被擊倒——則是不幸的;而以最真實、最確鑿的幸福居首位的,乃是敬拜神的善人,這幸福唯獨由神所賜。因此,那共和國因敗壞的品行而滅亡之時,它的諸神並未為引導或糾正其品行、使它免於滅亡而有所作為;不,它們反倒助長了品行的腐化與敗壞,好叫它滅亡。也別讓它們假裝良善,彷彿因公民的不義而受冒犯就離去了。它們確確實實就在那裡;它們被揭發、被定罪;它們既不能藉教誨施以援手,也無法藉緘默隱藏自己。
3:94
Omitto quod Marius a miserantibus Minturnensibus Maricae deae in luco eius commendatus est, ut ei omnia prosperaret, et ex summa desperatione reuersus incolumis in Vrbem duxit crudelem crudelis exercitum; ubi quam cruenta, quam inciuilis hostilique inmanior eius uictoria fuerit, eos qui scripserunt legant qui uolunt.
I pass over the fact that Marius, by the compassionate people of Minturnae, was commended to the goddess Marica in her grove, that she might prosper all things for him; and that, returning safe from the depth of despair, he led back into the City a cruel army as their cruel commander—where how bloody, how uncivil, and more savage than an enemy's, his victory was, let those read who wish, from those who have written of it.
我略過這一點:馬略曾被憐憫他的明圖爾奈人在女神瑪利卡的林苑中託付給她,求她使他事事亨通;而他從絕望的深淵中安然歸來,作為殘忍的統帥率領一支殘忍的軍隊回到城中——他在那裡的勝利何等血腥、何等野蠻、比敵人更加兇暴,願讀者從那些記述過此事的人的筆下自行去讀。
3:95
Sed hoc, ut dixi, omitto, nec Maricae nescio cui tribuo Marii sanguineam felicitatem, sed occultae potius prouidentiae Dei ad istorum ora claudenda eosque ab errore liberandos, qui non studiis agunt, sed haec prudenter aduertunt, quia, etsi aliquid in his rebus daemones possunt, tantum possunt, quantum secreto omnipotentis arbitrio permittuntur, ne magnipendamus terrenam felicitatem, quae sicut Mario malis etiam plerumque conceditur, nec eam rursus quasi malam arbitremur, cum ea multos etiam pios ac bonos unius ueri Dei cultores inuitis daemonibus praepolluisse uideamus, nec eosdem inmundissimos spiritus uel propter haec ipsa bona malaue terrena propitiandos aut timendos existimemus, quia, sicut ipsi mali homines in terra, sic etiam illi non omnia quae uolunt facere possunt, nisi quantum illius ordinatione sinitur, cuius plene iudicia nemo conprehendit, iuste nemo reprehendit.
But this, as I have said, I pass over; nor do I attribute the bloody good fortune of Marius to some Marica or other, but rather to the hidden providence of God, so as to shut the mouths of these men and to deliver from error those who consider these things prudently, not out of party zeal. For, even if the demons can do something in these matters, they can do only so much as by the secret decree of the Almighty they are permitted; lest we should set a high value on earthly happiness, which is often granted even to wicked men, as it was to Marius; nor again should we deem it evil, since we see that many even pious and good worshippers of the one true God have surpassed others in it, against the will of the demons; nor should we suppose that these most unclean spirits are to be propitiated or feared on account of these very earthly goods or evils; for, just as wicked men themselves upon earth, so also those spirits cannot do all that they wish, but only so far as it is allowed by the ordinance of Him whose judgments no one fully comprehends, whom no one justly reproves.
但這一點,如我所說,我略而不論;我也不把馬略血腥的幸運歸於某個瑪利卡,而寧可歸於神隱祕的護理,好堵住這些人的口,並救那些謹慎(而非出於黨派熱忱)思量這些事的人脫離謬誤。因為,即便邪魔在這些事上能有所作為,它們所能為的也不過是全能者以其隱祕的旨意所容許的那麼多;免得我們高看塵世的幸福——這幸福如同賜給馬略一般,也常賜給惡人;也免得我們反過來把它當作惡事,因為我們看見連許多敬虔良善、敬拜獨一真神的人也在其中超越眾人,儘管邪魔並不情願;我們也不當以為這些至污的邪靈因這些塵世的禍福本身而當被討好或懼怕;因為,正如塵世上邪惡的人自己一樣,那些邪靈也不能為所欲為,只能在祂的安排所容許的範圍內行事——祂的審判無人能完全參透,也無人能公正地指摘。
3:96
[XXIV] Sulla certe ipse, cuius tempora talia fuerunt, ut superiora, quorum uindex esse uidebatur, illorum comparatione quaererentur, cum primum ad Vrbem contra Marium castra mouisset, adeo laeta exta immolanti fuisse scribit Liuius, ut custodiri se Postumius haruspex uoluerit capitis supplicium subiturus, nisi ea, quae in animo Sulla haberet, diis iuuantibus impleuisset. Ecce non discesserant adytis atque aris relictis di, quando de rerum euentu praedicebant nihilque de ipsius Sullae correctione curabant. Promittebant praesagando felicitatem magnam nec malam cupiditatem minando frangebant.
Sulla himself, certainly, whose times were such that the former times, of which he seemed to be the avenger, were longed for in comparison with them—when he first moved his camp toward the City against Marius, offered sacrifice, and Livy writes that the entrails were so favourable that Postumius the soothsayer wished to be kept under guard, ready to undergo capital punishment unless Sulla, with the gods aiding, should accomplish what he had in mind. Behold, the gods had not departed, forsaking their shrines and altars, since they foretold the outcome of events—and yet cared nothing for the correction of Sulla himself. They promised, by their presaging, great happiness, and did not break his evil lust by any threat.
確實,就連蘇拉本人——他的時代如此不堪,以致人們拿他所似要為之復仇的前朝與之相較而懷念前朝——當他初次拔營向羅馬城進發、對抗馬略之時,曾獻祭;李維記載說牲畜的內臟徵兆如此吉利,以致占卜師波斯圖米烏斯甘願被拘押看管,準備領受死刑,若蘇拉未能在諸神相助下成就他心中所謀的話。看哪,諸神並未離去、棄下神龕與祭壇,因為它們預言了事件的結局——然而對蘇拉本人的悔改卻毫不在意。它們藉預告應許了極大的幸福,卻未以任何警嚇挫敗他邪惡的私慾。
3:97
Deinde cum esset in Asia bellum Mithridaticum gerens, per Lucium Titium ei mandatum est a loue, quod esset Mithridatem superaturus, et factum est. Ac postea molienti redire in Vrbem et suas amicorumque iniurias ciuili sanguine ulcisci, iterum mandatum est ab eodem loue per militem quendam legionis sextae, prius se de Mithridate praenuntiasse uictoriam, et tunc promittere daturum se potestatem, qua recuperaret ab inimicis rem publicam non sine multo sanguine. Tum percontatus Sulla, quae forma militi uisa fuerit, cum ille indicasset, eam recordatus est, quam prius ab illo audierat, qui de Mithridatica uictoria ab eodem mandata pertulerat.
Then, when he was waging the Mithridatic war in Asia, it was announced to him by Jupiter, through one Lucius Titius, that he would overcome Mithridates; and so it came to pass. And afterwards, when he was contriving to return to the City and to avenge his own and his friends' injuries with the blood of fellow-citizens, it was again announced to him by the same Jupiter, through a certain soldier of the sixth legion, that He had first foretold the victory over Mithridates, and now promised that He would give him power by which he might recover the commonwealth from his enemies, not without much bloodshed. Then Sulla, having inquired what form had appeared to the soldier, when the man had described it, recognised it as the same which he had earlier heard of from that other man who had brought the message about the Mithridatic victory from the same Jupiter.
隨後,當他在亞細亞進行米特里達梯戰爭之際,朱庇特藉一個名叫路奇烏斯·提提烏斯的人向他宣告,他將戰勝米特里達梯;果然如此。此後,當他正圖謀返回羅馬城、用同胞的血為自己和朋友所受的傷害復仇之時,同一位朱庇特又藉第六軍團的某個士兵向他宣告:祂先前曾預告了對米特里達梯的勝利,如今應許要賜他權柄,好叫他從仇敵手中奪回共和國,卻免不了大量流血。於是蘇拉查問那士兵所見的形貌如何,那人描述之後,他認出這正是他先前從另一個人口中所聽聞的、同樣的形貌——就是那從同一位朱庇特處帶來米特里達梯勝利消息的人。
3:98
Quid hic responderi potest, quare dii curauerint ueIut felicia ista nuntiare, et nullus eorum curauerit Sullam monendo corrigere mala tanta facturum scelestis annis ciuilibus, qualia non foedarent, sed auferrent omnino rem pubficam? Nempe intelleguntur daemones, sicut saepe dixi notumque nobis est in litteris sacris resque ipsae satis indicant, negotium suum agere, ut pro diis habeantur et colantur, ut ea illis exhibeantur, quibus hi qui exhibent sociati unam pessimam causam cum eis habeant in iudicio Dei. Deinde cum uenisset Tarentum Sulla atque ibi sacrificasset, uidit in capite uitulini iecoris similitudinem coronae aureae.
What can here be answered—why the gods took care to announce, as it were, these prosperous things, and none of them took care to correct Sulla by warning him that he would do such great evils in those wicked civil years, evils such as would not merely defile but utterly destroy the commonwealth? Assuredly the demons are understood, as I have often said and as is known to us in the sacred writings, and as the facts themselves sufficiently indicate, to be pursuing their own business—that they may be held and worshipped as gods, that such things may be exhibited to them, by which those who exhibit them, associated with the demons, may have one most evil cause together with them in the judgment of God. Then, when Sulla had come to Tarentum and had sacrificed there, he saw upon the head of the calf's liver the likeness of a golden crown.
這裡能作何解答呢——諸神為何巴不得宣告這些看似順遂之事,其中卻無一位費心去警戒糾正蘇拉,免得他在那些邪惡的內戰歲月中犯下如此重大的惡行,就是那不僅玷污、更要徹底摧毀共和國的惡行?誠然,這些邪魔——正如我屢次所言、正如我們在聖經中所知、也正如事實本身充分顯明的——乃是在辦它們自己的勾當:要被當作神明來看待、敬拜,要人向它們獻上這樣的事,好叫獻上這些事的人與它們結黨,在神的審判中與它們同擔一個最邪惡的罪案。隨後,當蘇拉來到塔蘭圖姆並在那裡獻祭時,他看見小牛肝的頂端有一個金冠的形像。
3:99
Tunc Postumius haruspex ille respondit praeclaram significare uictoriam iussitque ut extis illis solus uesceretur. Postea paruo interuallo seruus cuiusdam Luci Pontii uaticinando clamauit: "A Bellona nuntius uenio, uictoria tua est, Sulla. w Deinde adiecit arsurum esse Capitolium. Hoc cum dixisset, continuo egressus e castris postero ffie concitatior reuersus est et Capitolium arsisse clamauit. Arserat autem re uera Capitolium. Quod quidem daemoni et praeuidere facile fuit et celerrime nuntiare. Illud sane intende, quod ad causam maxime pertinet, sub qualibus diis esse cupiant, qui blasphemant Saluatorem uoluntates fidelium a dominatu daemonum liberantem. Clamauit homo uaticinando:
Then that soothsayer Postumius answered that it signified a glorious victory, and bade that he alone should eat of those entrails. Afterwards, at a small interval, a slave of a certain Lucius Pontius cried out in prophecy: 'I come as a messenger from Bellona; the victory is thine, Sulla!' Then he added that the Capitol would be burned. When he had said this, going straight out of the camp, on the following day he returned more agitated, and cried out that the Capitol had been burned. And the Capitol had indeed been burned. This the demon could both easily foresee and most swiftly announce. But mark this well, which most pertains to our case: under what sort of gods those men desire to be, who blaspheme the Saviour that sets free the wills of the faithful from the dominion of the demons. The man cried out in prophecy:
於是那占卜師波斯圖米烏斯回答說,這徵兆預示一場輝煌的勝利,並吩咐唯獨蘇拉一人吃那內臟。此後不久,某個路奇烏斯·龐提烏斯的奴僕發預言喊道:『我是從貝洛娜那裡來的使者;蘇拉,勝利歸你!』接著他又補說卡皮托利神殿將要被焚。他說完這話,立時走出營外,次日更加激動地回來,喊說卡皮托利已被焚毀。而卡皮托利確實已被焚毀。這事,邪魔既能輕易預見,又能極其迅速地通報。但你要好好留意這一點,這與我們的論題最為相關:那些褻瀆救主——就是那使信徒的意志從邪魔轄制下得釋放者——的人,究竟渴望歸屬於何等的神明之下。那人發預言喊道:
3:100
"Victoria tua est, Sulla, "atque ut id diuino spiritu clamare crederetur, nuntiauit etiam aliquid et prope futurum et mox factum, unde longe aberat per quem ille spiritus loquebatur; non tamen clamauit: m Ab sceleribu s parce, Sulla w, quae illic uictor tam horrenda commisit, cui corona aurea ipsius uictoriae inlustrissimum signum in uitulino iecore apparuit, qualia signa si dii iusti dare solerent ac non daemones impii, profecto illis extis nefaria potius atque ipsi Sullae grauiter noxia mala futura monstrarent. Neque enim eius dignitati tantum profuit illa uictoria, quantum nocuit cupiditati;
'The victory is thine, Sulla!' And that it might be believed he cried this by a divine spirit, he announced also something both near at hand and soon to be fulfilled, from which he was far removed, through whom that spirit spoke; yet he did not cry: 'Spare thyself from crimes, Sulla!'—the crimes so horrible which the conqueror there committed, to whom the golden crown, the most illustrious sign of the victory itself, appeared in the calf's liver. If just gods, and not impious demons, were wont to give such signs, assuredly in those entrails they would rather have shown forth the wicked and grievously baneful evils to come, evils grievous to Sulla himself. For that victory profited his dignity not so much as it harmed his lust;
『蘇拉,勝利歸你!』而為了叫人相信他是憑神靈喊出這話,他還宣告了某件既迫近、又不久便應驗的事,而藉他說話的那靈本與此事相距甚遠;然而他並未喊道:『蘇拉,戒絕罪惡吧!』——就是那得勝者在那裡所犯下的、如此可怖的罪行;那在小牛肝上向他顯現的金冠,正是那勝利本身最顯赫的徵兆。倘若公義的神、而非不虔的邪魔慣常賜下這樣的徵兆,它們必定會在那內臟中寧可顯明將臨的邪惡、以及對蘇拉本人沉重有害的禍患。因為那勝利對他的尊嚴之益,遠不及它對他私慾之害;
3:101
qua factum est, ut inmoderatis inhians et secundis rebus elatus ac praecipitatus magis ipse periret in moribus, quam inimicos in corporibus perderet. Haec illi dii uere tristia uereque lugenda non extis, non auguriis, non cuiusquam somnio uel uaticinio praenuntiabant. Magis enim timebant ne corrigeretur quam ne uinceretur. Immo satis agebant, ut uictor ciuium gloriosus uictus atque captiuus nefandis uitiis et r haec ipsis etiam daemonibus multo obstrictius subderetur.
by which it came to pass that, gaping after immoderate things and lifted up and hurled headlong by prosperity, he himself perished more in his morals than he destroyed his enemies in their bodies. These truly sad and truly lamentable things those gods did not foretell to him by entrails, nor by auguries, nor by anyone's dream or prophecy. For they feared more that he should be corrected than that he should be conquered. Nay, they were busily occupied that the conqueror of his fellow-citizens, glorious in the eyes of men, should himself be conquered and made captive by his abominable vices, and thereby be subjected all the more bindingly to those very demons.
由此便發生了這樣的事:他貪求無度、被順境高舉又拋擲於下,使他自己在品行上的敗亡,甚於他在肉體上對仇敵的殲滅。這些真正可悲、真正可歎的事,那些神並未藉內臟、藉占卜、也未藉任何人的夢境或預言向他預告。因為它們所懼怕的,寧是他得到糾正,而非他遭致敗北。不,它們反倒忙於一件事:要使這位在世人眼中榮耀的同胞征服者,自己被可憎的惡習所征服、所擄掠,並由此更加緊密地屈服於那些邪魔本身之下。
3:102
[XXV] Illinc uero quis non intellegat, quis non uideat, nisi qui tales deos imitari magis elegit quam diuina gratia ab eorum societate separari, quantum moliantur maligni isti spiritus exemplo suo uelut diuinam auctoritatem praebere sceleribus? quod etiam in quadam Campaniae lata planitie, ubi non multo p ost ciuiles acies nefario proelio conflixerunt, ipsi inter se prius pugnare uisi sunt. Namque ibi auditi sunt primum ingentes fragores, moxque multi se uidisse nuntiarunt per aliquot dies duas acies proeliari. Quae pugna ubi destitit, uestigia quoque uelut hominum et equorum, quanta de illa conflictatione exprimi poterant, inuenerunt.
But from all this who does not understand, who does not see—except one who has chosen rather to imitate such gods than by divine grace to be separated from their fellowship—how greatly these malignant spirits strive to lend, as it were, a kind of divine authority to crimes by their own example? This is shown even by that fact: on a certain wide plain of Campania, where not long after the citizen ranks clashed in impious battle, the spirits themselves were first seen to fight among themselves. For there, first, huge crashes were heard, and soon many reported that they had seen two battle-lines fighting for several days. And when that fight ceased, they even found footprints, as it were, of men and horses, as many as could be impressed by such a conflict.
但從這一切之中,有誰不明白、有誰看不出來——除非那寧可效法這樣的神、而不肯藉神恩脫離它們同夥的人——這些惡毒的邪靈何等竭力藉自己的榜樣,彷彿要賦予罪惡某種神聖的權威?這一點連底下這件事也顯明了:在坎帕尼亞某片寬廣的平原上——就在那地方,不久之後公民的陣營在不虔的戰役中彼此廝殺——那些邪靈自己竟先被人看見彼此爭戰。因為在那裡,起初先聽見巨大的轟響,隨即許多人報告說,他們曾一連數日看見兩軍列陣交戰。那戰鬥止息之後,他們甚至發現了彷彿人馬的足跡,正是這樣一場衝突所能留下的那麼多。
3:103
Si ergo ueraciter inter se numina pugnauerunt, iam bella ciuilia excusantur humana; consideretur tamen quae sit talium deorum uel malitia uel miseria: si autem se pugnasse finxerunt, quid aliud egerunt, nisi ut sibi Romani bellando ciuiliter tamquam deorum exemplo nullum nefas admittere uiderentur? Iam enim coeperant bella ciuilia, et aliquot nefandorum proeliorum strages execranda praecesserat. Iam multos mouerat, quod miles quidam, dum occiso spolia detraheret, fratrem nudato cadauere agnouit ac detestatus bella ciuilia se ipsum ibi perimens fraterno corpori adiunxit.
If, therefore, the deities truly fought among themselves, then human civil wars are excused; yet let it be considered what the malice or the misery of such gods is. But if they only feigned to fight, what else did they accomplish, except that the Romans, by waging civil war, might seem to admit no wickedness, as though following the example of the gods? For by now the civil wars had begun, and the execrable slaughter of several impious battles had gone before. Now it had already moved many, that a certain soldier, while stripping the spoils from one he had slain, recognised his brother upon uncovering the corpse, and, cursing the civil wars, slew himself there and joined himself to his brother's body.
因此,倘若這些神真的彼此爭戰,那麼人間的內戰便有了藉口;然而請思量這樣的神其惡毒或其可悲究竟為何。但倘若它們不過是假裝爭戰,那它們除了要使羅馬人在打內戰時彷彿仿效諸神的榜樣、以為並無不義可言之外,還成就了什麼呢?因為那時內戰早已開始,好幾場不虔戰役中令人髮指的屠殺也已先行。當時有一件事已使許多人動容:某個士兵在剝取所殺之人的戰利品時,掀開屍體竟認出那是他的兄弟,便詛咒內戰,在那裡自刎,投於他兄弟的屍身之上。
3:104
Vt ergo huius tanti mali minime taederet, sed armorum scelestorum magis magisque ardor incresceret, noxii daemones, quos illi deos putantes colendos et uenerandos arbitrabantur, inter se pugnantes hominibus apparere uoluerunt, ne imitari tales pugnas ciuica trepidaret affectio, sed potius humanum scelus diuino excusaretur exemplo. Hac astutia maligni spiritus etiam ludos, unde multa iam dixi, scaenicos sibi dicari sacrarique iusserunt, ubi tanta deorum flagitia theatricis canticis atque fabularum actionibus celebrata et quisquis eos fecisse crederet et quisquis non crederet, sed tamen illos libentissime sibi talia exhiberi cerneret, securus imitaretur.
In order, therefore, that men might by no means grow weary of so great an evil, but that the ardour for wicked arms might grow more and more, the noxious demons, whom those men, thinking them gods, judged ought to be worshipped and venerated, willed to appear to men fighting among themselves, lest civic affection should tremble to imitate such battles, but rather that human crime should be excused by a divine example. By this cunning the malignant spirits also ordered that scenic games—of which I have already said much—should be dedicated and consecrated to themselves, where such disgraceful deeds of the gods were celebrated in theatrical songs and by the acting of stories, so that whoever believed the gods had done these things, and whoever did not believe it but nevertheless saw that they most gladly had such things exhibited to them, might imitate them without concern.
因此,為使人絕不厭倦於如此重大的惡事,反而使對邪惡兵戈的狂熱日益高漲,那些有害的邪魔——就是那些人誤以為是神、認定當敬拜尊崇的邪魔——便情願讓自己顯現為彼此爭戰,好叫公民之情不致因效法這樣的戰鬥而戰慄,反倒使人間的罪行藉神聖的榜樣得以開脫。這些惡毒的邪靈憑此詭計,還吩咐把——我已多有論及的——那些戲劇競技奉獻並祝聖給它們自己,在其中,諸神如此可恥的行徑被以戲劇歌曲和故事的演出來慶祝,好叫凡相信諸神確曾行過這些事的人,以及凡雖不相信、卻仍看見它們極其樂於讓人向自己搬演這類事的人,都能毫無顧忌地加以仿效。
3:105
Ne quis itaque existimaret in deos conuicia potius quam eis dignum aliquid scriptitasse, ubicumque illos inter se pugnasse poetae commemorarunt, ipsi ad decipiendos homines poetarum carmina firmauerunt, pugnas uidelicet suas non solum per scaenicos in theatro, uerum etiam per se ipsos in campo humanis oculis exhibentes. Haec dicere compulsi sumus, quoniam pessimis moribus ciuium Romanam rem publicam iam antea perditam fuisse nullamque remansisse ante aduentum Christi Jesu domini nostri auctores eorum dicere et scribere minime dubitarunt. Quam perditionem diis suis non inputant, qui mala transitoria, quibus boni, seu uiuant seu moriantur, perire non possunt, Christo nostro inputant:
Lest, therefore, anyone should suppose that the poets had written railings against the gods rather than something worthy of them, wherever the poets recorded that the gods had fought among themselves, the demons themselves confirmed the poets' songs, so as to deceive men, exhibiting their battles to human eyes not only through the players in the theatre, but even through themselves in the field. We have been compelled to say these things, since their own authors have by no means hesitated to say and write that the Roman commonwealth had already before been ruined through the wickedest morals of its citizens, and that no commonwealth had remained before the coming of Christ Jesus our Lord. This ruin they do not impute to their gods, they who impute to our Christ those transitory evils by which the good, whether they live or die, cannot perish:
因此,免得有人以為詩人們是在寫辱罵諸神的話、而非寫某種配得諸神的事,凡詩人記述諸神彼此爭戰之處,那些邪魔便親自證實了詩人的詩歌,好欺哄世人——它們不僅藉戲院裡的演員、甚至親自在戰場上把自己的爭戰呈現於人的眼前。我們不得不說這些事,因為他們自己的著作家毫不遲疑地說出並寫下:羅馬共和國早已因公民最邪惡的品行而毀滅,在我主基督耶穌降臨之前根本沒有共和國存留。這毀滅他們並不歸咎於他們自己的神,卻把那些短暫的禍患歸咎於我們的基督——善人無論是生是死,都不能因這些禍患而滅亡:
3:106
cum Christus noster tanta frequentet pro moribus optimis praecepta contra perditos mores; dii uero ipsorum nullis talibus praeceptis egerint aliquid cum suo cultore populo pro illa re publica, ne periret; immo eosdem mores uelut suis exemplis auctoritate noxia corrumpendo egerunt potius, ut periret. Quam non ideo tunc perisse quisquam, ut arbitror, iam dicere audebit, quia "discessere omnes adytis arisque relictis di", uelut amici uirtutibus, cum uitiis hominum offenderentur; quia tot signis extorum auguriorum uaticiniorum, quibus se tamquam praescios futurorum adiutoresque proeliorum iactare et commendare gestiebant, conuincuntur fuisse praesentes;
whereas our Christ so abundantly urges precepts for the best morals against corrupt morals; but their gods did nothing by any such precepts with their worshipping people for the sake of that commonwealth, that it might not perish; nay rather, by corrupting those same morals as though by their own examples with a baneful authority, they wrought instead that it should perish. Which commonwealth no one, I think, will now dare to say perished at that time because 'all the gods departed, forsaking their shrines and altars', as friends of the virtues, being offended by the vices of men; for by so many signs of entrails, auguries, and prophecies—by which they eagerly boasted and commended themselves as foreknowers of the future and helpers in battles—they are convicted to have been present;
反之,我們的基督如此豐豐富富地力陳關於最良善品行的訓誡,以抵擋敗壞的品行;但他們的神卻未曾藉任何這樣的訓誡與敬拜它們的子民一同為那共和國作什麼、使它免於滅亡;不,更確切地說,它們反倒以自己的榜樣、憑有害的權威來敗壞那同樣的品行,成就了它的滅亡。我想如今再沒有人膽敢說那共和國在那時滅亡,是因為『眾神皆已離去、棄下神龕與祭壇』,彷彿作為美德之友,因人的惡行而受了冒犯;因為藉著如此眾多的內臟、占卜、預言的徵兆——它們正是靠這些急切地誇口、自薦為預知未來者與戰爭中的助力者——它們反被證實當時確實在場;
3:107
qui si uere abscessissent, mitius Romani in bella ciuilia suis cupiditatibus quam illorum instigationibus exarsissent. [XXVI] Quae cum ita sint, cum palam aperteque turpitudines crudelitatibus mixtae, opprobria numinum et crimina, siue prodita siue conficta, ipsis exposcentibus et nisi fieret irascentibus etiam certis et statutis sollemnitatibus consecrata illis et dicata claruerint atque ad omnium oculos, ut imitanda proponerentur, spectanda processerint:
and if they had truly departed, the Romans would have burned into civil wars more mildly by their own lusts than by the instigations of these gods. Since these things are so—since the base deeds mingled with cruelties, the reproaches and crimes of the deities, whether disclosed or fabricated, at their own demand and with them being angry unless it were done, consecrated and dedicated to them even by fixed and appointed solemnities, have become manifest and have come forth to be gazed upon before the eyes of all, so that they might be set forth for imitation—
倘若它們真的離去了,羅馬人任憑自己的私慾而燒入內戰,也會比因這些神的煽動而燒入來得溫和些。既然事情如此——既然那些與殘忍相摻雜的醜行、諸神的種種惡名與罪過(無論是被揭露的還是被杜撰的),乃是應它們自己的要求、且若不照辦它們便震怒,甚至藉固定而規定的節慶被祝聖並奉獻給它們,如今已昭然若揭,並被搬出來擺在眾人眼前供人觀看,好叫它們被立為仿效的樣板——
3:108
quid est, quod idem ipsi daemones, qui se huiusce modi uoluptatibus inmundos esse spiritus confitentur, qui suis flagitiis et facinoribus, siue indicatis siue simulatis, eorumque sibi celebratione petita ab inpudentibus, extorta a pudentibus auctores se uitae scelestae inmundaeque testantur, perhibentur tamen in adytis suis secretisque penetralibus dare quaedam bona praecepta de moribus quibusdam uelut electis sacratis suis? Quod si ita est, hoc ipso callidior aduertenda est et conuincenda malitia spirituum noxiorum.
what is this, that these same demons—who by pleasures of this kind confess themselves to be unclean spirits; who by their own disgraceful deeds and crimes, whether disclosed or feigned, and by the celebration of them demanded from the shameless and extorted from the modest, testify themselves to be the authors of a wicked and unclean life—are nevertheless reported, in their inner shrines and secret recesses, to give certain good precepts concerning morals to certain, as it were, chosen and consecrated followers of theirs? If it be so, by this very thing the more crafty malice of these noxious spirits is to be observed and convicted.
這究竟是怎麼一回事:這些同樣的邪魔——它們藉這類淫樂承認自己是不潔的靈;它們藉自己可恥的行徑與罪行(無論是被揭露的還是佯裝的),並藉向無恥之徒索求、從知恥之人強逼而來的對這些事的慶祝,見證自己是邪惡不潔生活的始作俑者——竟據說在它們內室的神龕與隱祕的密所中,向某些彷彿蒙揀選、被祝聖的隨從賜下某些關於品行的良善訓誡?若真如此,正由此事,這些有害邪靈那更為狡詐的惡毒便當被察覺、被定罪。
3:109
Tanta enim uis est probitatis et castitatis, ut omnis uel paene omnis eius laude moueatur humana natura, nec usque adeo sit turpitudine uitiosa, ut totum sensum honestatis amiserit. Proinde malignitas daemonum, nisi alicubi se, quem ad modum scriptum in nostris litteris nouimus, transfjguret in angelos lucis, non implet negotium deceptionis. Foris itaque populis celeberrimo strepitu impietas impura circumsonat, et intus paucis castitas simulata uix sonat; praebentur propatula pudendis et secreta laudandis; decus latet et dedecus patet; quod malum geritur omnes conuocat spectatores, quod bonum dicitur uix aliquos inuenit auditores, tamquam honesta erubescenda sint et inhonesta glorianda.
For so great is the force of uprightness and chastity, that all, or almost all human nature, is moved by the praise of it, nor is it so far vicious with baseness as to have lost the whole sense of honour. Accordingly the malignity of the demons, unless somewhere—just as we know it written in our sacred writings—it transforms itself into an angel of light, does not accomplish the business of deception. Outside, therefore, impure impiety resounds all about the peoples with a most crowded din; and within, to a few, feigned chastity scarcely whispers. Open places are furnished for shameful things, and secret ones for things praiseworthy; honour lies hidden and dishonour lies open; the evil that is done calls together all spectators, the good that is spoken scarcely finds any hearers—as though honourable things were to be blushed at, and dishonourable ones to be gloried in.
因為正直與貞潔的力量如此之大,以致全部、或幾乎全部的人性都被它的讚美所打動,人性也未曾墮落到卑劣至完全喪失了榮譽感的地步。因此,邪魔的惡毒,除非在某處——正如我們所知我們聖經上所記——把自己裝作光明的天使,否則便無法成就欺哄的勾當。所以在外頭,污穢的不虔以最喧嚷的鼓譟環繞著萬民作響;在裡頭,向著少數人,佯裝的貞潔卻幾乎只是低聲細語。敞開的場所供作可恥之事,隱祕的密所卻留給可讚之事;榮譽隱而不見,恥辱卻公然暴露;所行的惡召聚一切觀眾,所講的善卻幾乎覓不著幾個聽者——彷彿正當之事該當羞愧,不正之事倒該當誇耀。
3:110
Sed ubi hoc nisi in daemonum templis? ubi nisi in fallaciae diuersoriis? Illud enim fit, ut honestiores, qui pauci sunt, capiantur; hoc autem, ne plures, qui sunt turpissimi, corrigantur. Vbi et quando sacrati Caelestis audiebant castitatis praecepta, nescimus; ante ipsum tamen deIubrum, ubi simulacrum illud locatum conspiciebamus, uniuersi undique confluentes et ubi quisque poterat stantes ludos qui agebantur intentissime spectabamus, intuentes alternante conspectu hinc meretriciam pompam, illinc uirginem deam; illam suppliciter adorari, ante illam turpia celebrari; non ibi pudibundos mimos, nullam uerecundiorem scaenicam uidimus; cuncta obscenitatis implebantur officia.
But where does this happen, save in the temples of the demons? where, save in the lodging-places of deceit? For the one is done, that the more honourable, who are few, may be captured; the other, that the more, who are most base, may not be corrected. Where and when the consecrated of Caelestis heard the precepts of chastity, we know not; yet before that very shrine, where we beheld the image placed, all flocking together from every side and standing wherever each could, we most intently watched the games that were being performed, gazing with alternating look, here on the harlot-procession, there on the virgin goddess; her being adored with supplication, before her shameful things being celebrated. There we saw no bashful mimes, no more modest actress; all the offices of obscenity were being fulfilled.
但這事發生在哪裡呢,若非在邪魔的廟宇裡?在哪裡呢,若非在欺哄的客舍中?因為前一件事之所以行,是要擄獲那為數不多、較為體面的人;後一件事之所以行,是要使那為數眾多、最為卑鄙的人不得糾正。凱萊斯提斯的被祝聖者何時何地聽過貞潔的訓誡,我們不得而知;然而就在那神龕之前——我們看見那偶像安置的地方——眾人從四面八方蜂擁而至,各人能站哪就站哪,我們極其專注地觀看正在上演的競技,目光交替,這邊看妓女的行列,那邊看童貞女神;她被人俯伏敬拜,在她面前卻慶祝著可恥之事。在那裡我們看不到一個知羞的默劇演員,沒有一個較為端莊的女伶;淫穢的一切勾當都在履行著。
3:111
Sciebatur uirginali numini quid placeret, et exhibebatur quod de templo domum matrona doJctior reportaret. Nonnullae pudentiores auertebant faciem aIu impuris motibus scaenicorum et artem flagitii furtiua intentione discebant. Hominibus namque uerecundabantur, ne auderent impudicos gestus ore libero cernere; sed multo minus audebant sacra eius, quam uenerabantur, casto corde damnare. Hoc tamen palam discendum praebebatur in templo, ad quod perpetrandum saltem secretum quaerebatur in domo, mirante nimium, si ullus ibi erat, pudore mortalium, quod humana flagitia non libere homines committerent, quae apud deos etiam religiose discerent iratos habituri, nisi etiam exhibere curarent.
It was known what pleased the virginal deity, and there was exhibited what the matron might carry home from the temple the more learned. Some, the more modest, turned away their faces from the impure movements of the players, and yet learned the art of shameful things by a furtive attention. For they were ashamed before men, that they should not dare to behold with a free countenance the immodest gestures; but much less did they dare to condemn with a chaste heart the sacred rites of her whom they venerated. Yet this was openly offered to be learned in the temple, which, at least, to be perpetrated, a secret place was sought in the home; too greatly wondering—if any shame of mortals was there at all—that men should not freely commit the human disgraces which they would even religiously learn in the presence of the gods, being about to have those gods angry, unless they also took care to exhibit them.
人所知曉的乃是這童貞女神所喜悅之事,並且在那裡搬演出來的,是那作主母的可以更「有學問地」從廟裡帶回家中的東西。有些較為知恥的婦女,把臉從演員污穢的動作前轉開,卻又以偷偷的留神學會了那可恥之藝。因為她們在人面前羞愧,不敢以坦然的面容注視那些不知羞的姿態;但她們更不敢以貞潔的心去譴責她們所尊崇之神的聖禮。然而這事竟公然在廟裡供人學習,而這事要付諸實行時,至少還要在家中另尋隱祕之處;人若在那裡尚存一點羞恥之心,便會大為詫異:世人竟不肯自由地去犯那些人間的醜行,那些他們甚至虔誠地在諸神面前所學會的醜行——他們深知,除非他們也費心把這些搬演出來,否則就要使那些神震怒。
3:112
Quis enim alius spiritus occulto instinctu nequissimas agitans mentes et instat faciendis adulteriis et pascitur factis, nisi qui etiam sacris talibus oblectatur, constituens in templis simulacra daemonum, amans in ludis simulacra uitiorum, susurrans in occulto uerba iustitiae ad decipiendos etiam paucos bonos, equentans in aperto inuitamenta nequitiae ad possidendos innumerabiles malos? [XXVII] Vir grauis et philosophaster Tullius aedilis futurus clamat in auribus ciuitatis, inter cetera sui magistratus officia sibi Floram matrem ludorum celebritate placandam; qui ludi tanto deuotius, quanto turpius celebrari solent.
For what other spirit is it that by a hidden instinct stirs up the most wicked minds, and both urges on the committing of adulteries and is fed upon the deeds, save he who also takes delight in such rites—setting up in temples the images of demons, loving in the games the images of vices, whispering in secret words of justice to deceive even the few good, thronging in the open the enticements of wickedness to possess the innumerable wicked? A grave man and dabbler in philosophy, Tullius, when about to be aedile, cries out in the ears of the citizenry that among the other duties of his magistracy the Mother Flora must be appeased by him with a celebration of games—games which are wont to be celebrated the more devoutly, the more shamefully.
因為那藉隱祕的驅使煽動最邪惡心思、既催逼人行姦淫又以這些惡行為食的,若非那也以此類聖禮為樂的靈,還能是什麼別的靈呢?——它在廟宇中設立邪魔的偶像,在競技中愛慕惡習的偶像,在隱祕處低聲說著公義的話語以欺哄那少數的善人,在公開場合湧現罪惡的誘餌以占據那無數的惡人。一位莊重而略通哲學的人物,圖利烏斯(西塞羅),在將要出任市政官之際,在全城公民耳中高呼:在他官職的其他職責之外,他必須以一場競技慶典討好花神芙羅拉——而這類競技慣常是愈可恥便愈虔誠地被慶祝的。
3:113
Dicit alio loco iam consul in extremis periculis ciuitatis, et ludos per decem dies factos, neque rem ullam quae ad placandos deos pertineret praetermissam; quasi non satius erat tales deos inritare temperantia quam placare luxuria, et eos honestate etiam ad inimicitias prouocare quam tanta deformitate lenire. Neque enim grauius fuerant quamlibet crudelissima inmanitate nocituri homines, propter quos placabantur, quam nocebant ipsi, cum uitiositate foedissima placarentur.
He says in another place, now as consul, in the extreme perils of the state, that games were held for ten days, and that no single thing which pertained to appeasing the gods was omitted; as though it were not better to provoke such gods by temperance than to appease them by luxury, and to challenge them even to enmities by honourable conduct than to soothe them by such great deformity. For those men, however cruel by the most savage barbarity they might be about to prove harmful, on whose account the gods were appeased, would not have harmed more grievously than the gods themselves harmed, when they were appeased by the foulest viciousness.
他在另一處,如今作為執政官,在邦國最危急的關頭說:競技舉行了十日之久,凡與討好諸神有關之事無一遺漏;彷彿以節制去激怒這樣的神、不如以奢靡去討好它們,以正當的操守甚至去招致它們的敵意、不如以如此巨大的醜態去撫慰它們,其實倒不然。因為那些為之討好諸神的人,無論將以何等最兇殘的暴虐加害於人,其所加之害也不及那些神本身在被那最污穢的邪惡討好之時所加之害更為沉重。
3:114
Quando quidem ut auerteretur quod metuebatur ab hoste in corporibus, eo modo dii conciliabantur, quo uirtus debellaretur in mentibus, qui non opponerentur defensores oppugnatoribus moenium, nisi prius fierent expugnatores morum bonorum.
For in order that what was feared from the enemy in men's bodies might be averted, the gods were conciliated in such a way that virtue was vanquished in men's minds; nor would defenders be set against the assailants of the walls, unless first there arose stormers of good morals.
因為,為了要使人在肉體上所懼怕於敵人的災禍得以轉離,諸神竟以這樣一種方式被撫慰——就是使美德在人的心靈中被擊敗;而抵禦攻城者的守衛也不會被設立起來,除非先有那攻陷良善品行的人興起。
3:115
Hanc talium numinum placation em petulantissimam inpurissimam inpudentissimam nequissimam inmundissimam, cuius actores laudanda Romanae uirtutis indoles honore priuauit tribu mouit, agnouit turpes fecit infames, hanc, inquam, pudendam ueraeque religioni auersandam et detestandam talium numinum placationem, fabulas in deos inlecebrosa atque criminosas, haec ignominiosa deorum uel scelerate turpiterque facta uel sceleratius turpiusque conficta oculis et auribus publicis ciuitas tota discebat, haec commissa numinibus placere cernebat, et ideo non solum illis exhibenda, sed sibi quoque imitanda credebat, non illud nescio quid uelut bonum et honestum, quod tam paucis et tam occulte dicebatur (si tamen dicebatur), ut magis ne innotesceret, quam ne non fieret, timeretur.
This appeasing of such deities, most wanton, most impure, most shameless, most wicked, most unclean—whose performers the praiseworthy character of Roman virtue deprived of honour, removed from the tribe, acknowledged and made them base and infamous—this, I say, shameful appeasing of such deities, to be shunned and detested by the true religion, these tales alluring and criminal against the gods, these ignominious deeds either wickedly and basely done by the gods or still more wickedly and basely fabricated, the whole city learned before the public eyes and ears; and it perceived that these deeds committed pleased the deities, and therefore believed that they were not only to be exhibited to them, but also to be imitated by itself—not that I-know-not-what, as it were good and honourable, which was spoken so to a few and so secretly (if indeed it was spoken at all), that it was feared rather lest it should become known, than lest it should not be done.
對這樣的神明所作的這種討好——最放縱、最污穢、最無恥、最邪惡、最不潔的討好,其表演者被值得稱道的羅馬美德品格剝奪了榮譽、逐出部族、公認為卑賤而使之聲名狼藉——我說,這種對如此神明所作的、可恥的、真宗教當避而遠之並深惡痛絕的討好,這些引誘人心、控罪諸神的戲文,這些不名譽的行徑(無論是諸神邪惡卑鄙地行過的,還是更邪惡卑鄙地被杜撰出來的),整座城都在公眾的眼目與耳中學習著;而它眼見這些搬演出來的事討諸神喜悅,便以為不但當向它們搬演,也當由城自己加以仿效——而不是仿效那不知是什麼的、彷彿良善正當之物,那向如此少數人、如此隱祕地講說的東西(若果真曾講說過的話),以致人所懼怕的寧是它被人知曉,而非它未被實行。
3:116
[XXVIII] Ab istarum inmundissimarum potestatum tartareo iugo et societate poenali erui per Christi nomen homines et in lucem saluberrimae pietatis ab illa perniciosissimae impietatis nocte transferri queruntur et murmurant iniqui et ingrati et illo nefario spiritu altius obstrictiusque possessi, quia populi confluunt ad ecclesiam casta celebritate, honesta utriusque sexus discretione, ubi audiant quam bene hic ad tempus uiuere debeant, ut post hanc uitam beate semperque uiuere mereantur, ubi sancta scriptura iustitiaeque doctrina de superiore loco in conspectu omnium personante et qui faciunt audiant ad praemium, et qui non faciunt audiant ad iudicium.
That men are rescued through the name of Christ from the Tartarean yoke and penal fellowship of these most unclean powers, and are transferred into the light of most wholesome piety from that night of most pernicious impiety—at this the wicked and ungrateful complain and murmur, they who are more deeply and more bindingly possessed by that abominable spirit, because the peoples flock together to the Church with chaste assembly, with honourable separation of either sex, where they may hear how well they ought to live here for a time, that after this life they may deserve to live blessedly and for ever, where the holy Scripture and the doctrine of justice, sounding forth from a higher place in the sight of all, is heard both by those who do it, unto reward, and by those who do it not, unto judgment.
藉著基督的名,人被從這些至污權勢的地獄軛與刑罰同夥中救拔出來,並從那最有害的不虔之夜被遷入最有益的虔敬之光中——對此,那些邪惡忘恩、被那可憎之靈更深更緊地轄制的人卻抱怨、發怨言,因為眾民帶著貞潔的聚集、帶著兩性合宜的分隔,蜂擁到教會來,在那裡他們可以聽見自己在此暫居時當如何好好生活,好叫他們在此生之後配得享有蒙福、永遠的生命;在那裡,聖經與公義的教義從高處在眾人面前朗聲宣講,既被行這道的人所聽而得賞賜,也被不行的人所聽而受審判。
3:117
Quo etsi ueniunt quidam talium praeceptorum inrisores, omnis eorum petulantia aut repentina mutatione deponitur, aut timore uel pudore comprimitur. Nihil enim eis turpe ac flagitiosum spectandum imitandumque proponitur, ubi ueri Dei aut praecepta insinuantur aut miracula narrantur, aut dona laudantur aut beneficia p ostulantur. [XXIX] Haec potius concupisce, o indoles Romana laudabilis, o progenies Regulorum Scaeuolarum, Scipionum Fabriciorum; haec potius concupisce, haec ab illa turpissima uanitate et fallacissima daemonum malignitate discerne. Si quid in te laudabile naturaliter eminet, non nisi uera pietate purgatur atque perficitur, impietate autem disperditur et punitur.
Even if certain mockers of such precepts come thither, all their wantonness is either laid aside by a sudden change, or repressed by fear or shame. For nothing base and disgraceful is set forth there to be gazed at and imitated, where the precepts of the true God are either instilled, or miracles narrated, or gifts praised, or benefits sought. These things rather desire, O praiseworthy Roman character, O offspring of the Reguli, the Scaevolae, the Scipios, the Fabricii; these things rather desire; these things distinguish from that most base vanity and most deceitful malignity of the demons. If anything praiseworthy naturally stands out in thee, it is purged and perfected only by true piety, but by impiety it is ruined and punished.
縱然有某些嘲弄這類訓誡的人來到那裡,他們一切的放肆若非因驟然的轉變而被撇下,便是因畏懼或羞愧而被壓制。因為在那裡並無卑劣可恥之事被擺出來供人觀看仿效——在那裡,或是灌輸真神的訓誡,或是講述神蹟,或是稱頌恩賜,或是祈求恩惠。可稱道的羅馬品格啊,雷古盧斯、斯凱沃拉、西庇阿、法布里奇烏斯這等人的後裔啊,你當渴慕這些事;你當渴慕這些事;你當把這些事與邪魔那最卑鄙的虛妄、最詭詐的惡毒區別開來。倘若你裡面天然有任何可稱道之處,它唯獨藉真敬虔得潔淨、得成全,卻因不虔而被毀壞、被懲罰。
3:118
Nunc iam elige quid sequaris, ut non in te, sed in Deo uero sine ullo errore lauderis. Tunc enim tibi gloria popularis adfuit, sed occulto iudicio diuinae prouidentiae uera religio quam eligeres defuit. Expergiscere, dies est, sicut experrecta es in quibusdam, de quorum uirtute perfecta et pro fide uera etiam passionibus gloriamur, qui usquequaque aduersus potestates inimicissimas confligentes easque fortiter moriendo uincentes m sanguine nobis hanc patriam peperere suo w. Ad quam patriam te inuitamus et exhortamur, ut eius adiciaris numero ciuium, cuius quodam modo asylum est uera remissio peccatorum.
Now, then, choose what thou wilt follow, that thou mayest be praised not in thyself, but in the true God without any error. For in former times popular glory was present to thee, but by the hidden judgment of divine providence the true religion, which thou mightest choose, was wanting. Awake, it is day, as thou hast awakened in certain ones, of whose perfected virtue and true faith we glory even by their passions—who, everywhere contending against the most hostile powers and bravely conquering them by dying, purchased for us this fatherland with their blood. To which fatherland we invite and exhort thee, that thou mayest be added to the number of its citizens, whose sanctuary, in a certain manner, is the true remission of sins.
如今就當選擇你所要追隨的,好叫你得稱讚不在於你自己,而在於真神、毫無錯謬。因為在從前的年代,民間的榮耀曾臨到你,但按神護理隱祕的審判,那你本可揀選的真宗教卻付之闕如。醒來吧,天亮了,正如你已在某些人身上醒來——就是那些我們甚至藉其受難、為其成全的美德與真信德而誇耀的人;他們處處與最仇敵的權勢爭戰,藉著捨命勇敢地勝過它們,用自己的血為我們買得了這個祖國。我們邀請並勸勉你歸向這祖國,好叫你被添入它公民的行列,這祖國的庇護所在某種意義上,正是罪的真赦免。
3:119
Non audias degeneres tuos Christo Christianisue detrahentes et accusantes uelut tempora mala, cum quaerant tempora, quibus non sit quieta uita, sed potius secura nequitia. Haec tibi numquam nec pro terrena patria placuerunt. Nunc iam caelestem arripe, pro qua minimum laborabis, et in ea ueraciter semperque regnabis. Illic enim tibi non Vestalis focus, non lapis Capitolinus, sed Deus unus et uerus nec metas rerum nec tempora ponit, Imperium sine fine dabit. Noli deos falsos fallacesque requirere; abice potius atque contemne in ueram emicans libertatem. Non sunt dii, maligni sunt spiritus, quibus aeterna tua felicitas poena est.
Do not listen to thy degenerate ones who detract from Christ and the Christians, and accuse the times as evil, when they seek times in which not a quiet life, but rather a secure wickedness, may be had. These things never pleased thee even for the sake of an earthly fatherland. Now, then, seize the heavenly one, for which thou shalt labour very little, and in it thou shalt truly and for ever reign. For there no Vestal hearth, no Capitoline stone, but the one and true God sets thee neither bounds of things nor times: He shall give empire without end. Seek not the false and deceitful gods; rather cast them away and despise them, breaking forth into true liberty. They are not gods; they are malignant spirits, to whom thy eternal happiness is a punishment.
不要聽從你那些墮落的子民——他們詆毀基督與基督徒,控告這時代邪惡,其實他們所尋求的時代,並非安寧的生活,倒是穩妥的作惡。這等事就連為了塵世的祖國,也從未討你的喜歡。如今就當抓住那屬天的祖國吧,為它你只需勞苦一點點,在其中你將真實地、永遠地作王。因為在那裡,並無維斯塔的爐火,並無卡皮托利的石頭,而是那獨一真神,祂既不給你設立事物的界限,也不設立時間的界限:祂必賜你無窮盡的國度。不要尋求那些虛假詭詐的神;倒要把它們拋棄、藐視,奮力躍入真正的自由。它們並非神明,乃是惡毒的邪靈,你永恆的幸福對它們而言正是刑罰。
3:120
Non tam luno Troianis, a quibus carnalem originem ducis, arces uidetur inuidisse Romanas, quam isti daemones, quos adhuc deos putas, omni generi hominum sedes inuident sempiternas. Et tu ipsa non parua ex parte de talibus spiritibus iudicasti, quando ludis eos placasti, et per quos homines eosdem Iudos fecisti, infames esse uoluisti. Patere asseri libertatem tuam aduersus inmundos spiritus, qui tuis ceruicibus inposuerant sacrandam sibi et celebrandam ignominiam suam. Actores criminum diuinorum remouisti ab honoribus tuis: supplica Deo uero, ut a te remoueat illos deos, qui delectantur criminibus suis, seu ueris, quod ignominiosissimum est, seu falsis, quod malitiosissimum est .
Juno does not seem to have so envied the Roman citadels to the Trojans, from whom thou drawest thy carnal origin, as these demons, whom thou still thinkest gods, envy to the whole race of men their everlasting seats. And thou thyself hast in no small part judged concerning such spirits, when thou didst appease them with games, and yet didst will that those men, through whom thou madest those same games, should be infamous. Suffer thy liberty to be asserted against the unclean spirits, who had laid upon thy neck their own ignominy, to be hallowed and celebrated in their honour. Thou hast removed the performers of the divine crimes from thy honours: supplicate the true God, that He may remove from thee those gods who delight in their own crimes—whether true, which is most ignominious, or false, which is most malicious.
朱諾對特洛伊人(你的肉身源出於他們)妒忌羅馬的城堡,似乎還不及這些邪魔——就是你至今仍當作神的邪魔——妒忌全人類的永恆居所。而你自己對這樣的邪靈也早已在不小的程度上作了判斷,因為你既用競技討好它們,卻又斷定那些藉以搬演這些競技的人為聲名狼藉。你當容你的自由被伸張,以抵擋那些不潔的邪靈——它們曾把它們自己的恥辱加在你頸項上,要人祝聖並慶祝以尊崇它們。你既已把那些神聖罪行的表演者從你的尊榮中除去:那就懇求真神,好叫祂從你身上除去那些以自己的罪行為樂的神——無論那罪行是真的(這是最可恥的),還是假的(這是最惡毒的)。
3:121
Bene, quod tua sponte histrionibus et scaenicis societatem ciuitatis patere noluisti; euigila plenius! Nullo modo his artibus placatur diuina maiestas, quibus humana dignitas inquinatur. Quo igitur pacto deos, qui talibus delectantur obsequiis, haberi putas in numero sanctarum caelestium potestatum, cum homines, per quos eadem aguntur obsequia, non putasti habendos in numero qualiumcumque ciuium Romanorum? Incomparabiliter superna est ciuitas clarior, ubi uictoria ueritas, ubi dignitas saanctitas, ubi pax felicitas, ubi uita aeternitas. Multo minus habetin sua societate tales deos, si tu in tua tales homines habere erubuisti.
Well done, that of thine own accord thou didst not will the fellowship of the city to lie open to actors and stage-players; awake more fully! By no means is the divine majesty appeased by those arts by which human dignity is defiled. By what compact, therefore, dost thou think those gods, who delight in such observances, are to be reckoned in the number of the holy heavenly powers, when the men through whom those same observances are performed thou didst not think ought to be reckoned in the number of Roman citizens of any sort whatever? Incomparably more glorious is the city on high, where victory is truth, where dignity is holiness, where peace is happiness, where life is eternity. Much less does it have in its fellowship such gods, if thou hast blushed to have such men in thine.
你做得好,你既出於自願不肯讓城邦的公民權向優伶與戲子敞開;那就更充分地醒來吧!神的威嚴斷不會被那些玷污人性尊嚴的伎倆所討好。因此,你憑什麼盟約以為那些以此類獻媚為樂的神,當被列入聖潔屬天權能的行列,既然那些藉以行這同樣獻媚之事的人,你尚且斷定不該被列入任何一等羅馬公民的行列呢?那屬天的城無可比擬地更加輝煌,在那裡勝利即真理,尊嚴即聖潔,平安即幸福,生命即永恆。倘若你連在你自己的城中都恥於容留這樣的人,那麼那城就更不會在它的團契中容留這樣的神了。
← prev partnext part →
← ch. 2ch. 4 →
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344