📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 書信與論戰集(CSEL)

書信與論戰集(CSEL) 第 1 章 第 18/22 段

拉丁文原文.40 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 1:666–1:705(全章共 858 節)

第 2 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
1:666
inde mihi uisum est nihil esse aliud tempus quam distentionem: sed cuius rei, nescio, et mirum, si non ipsius animi. quid enim metior, obsecro, deus meus, et dico aut indefinite: "longius est hoc tempus quam illud" aut etiam definite: "duplum est hoc ad illud?" tempus metior, scio; sed non metior futurum, quia nondum est, non metior praesens, quia nullo spatio tenditur, non metior praeteritum, quia iam non est. quid ergo metior? an praetereuntia tempora, non praeterita? sic enim dixeram. Insiste, anime meus, et adtende fortiter: deus adiutor noster; ipse fecit nos, et non nos. adtende, ubi albescet ueritas.
由此我覺得時間無非是一種延展;但究竟是甚麼的延展,我卻不知道,倘若它不是心靈本身的延展,那才是怪事。因為我的神啊,我求問你:我所衡量的是甚麼呢?我或不確定地說:「這段時間比那段長」,或甚至確定地說:「這段是那段的兩倍」?我衡量時間,這我知道;但我不衡量將來,因為它尚不存在;我不衡量現在,因為它毫無長度可言;我不衡量過去,因為它已不存在。那麼,我所衡量的是甚麼呢?是正在過去的時間,而非已過去的時間嗎?因我先前正是這樣說的。我的心哪,奮力前進,竭力專注:神是幫助我們的;是他造了我們,並非我們自造。要專注於真理開始放白光之處。
From this it seemed to me that time is nothing other than a distension; but of what thing, I do not know, and it would be a marvel if it were not of the mind itself. For what do I measure, I beseech you, my God, and say either indefinitely, 'This time is longer than that,' or even definitely, 'This is double that'? Time I measure, I know; but I do not measure the future, because it does not yet exist, nor do I measure the present, because it is stretched out into no span, nor do I measure the past, because it already is not. What, then, do I measure? Is it passing times, not past ones? For so I had said. Press on, my mind, and attend strongly: God is our helper; he made us, and not we ourselves. Attend where truth begins to grow white.
1:667
ecce puta uox corporis incipit sonare et sonat et adhuc sonat et ecce desinit, iamque silentium est, et uox illa praeterita est et non est iam uox. futura erat, antequam sonaret, et non poterat metiri, quia nondum erat, et nunc non potest, quia iam non est. tunc ergo poterat, cum sonabat, quia tunc erat, quae metiri posset. sed et tunc non stabat; ibat enim et praeteriebat. an ideo magis poterat? praeteriens enim tendebatur in aliquod spatium temporis, quo metiri posset, quoniam praesens nullum habet spatium. si ergo tunc poterat, ecce puta altera coepit sonare et adhuc sonat continuato tenore sine ulla distinctione: metiamur eam, dum sonat;
看哪,假設一個肉身的聲音開始發響,它響著,仍然響著,看哪它停止了,如今寂靜了,那聲音便已過去,不再是聲音了。在它發響之先它是將來的,不能被衡量,因為它尚不存在;如今它也不能被衡量,因為它已不存在。所以唯有在那時、當它發響之際,它才能被衡量,因為那時有可被衡量之物存在。但即使那時它也不止住;因為它正在前行、正在過去。它豈不因此反而更可衡量嗎?因為它在過去之際被延展為某段時間,藉此可被衡量,既然現在毫無長度。那麼,它若在那時可被衡量,看哪,假設另一個聲音開始發響,仍然以連續不斷的音調發響、毫無間斷:讓我們在它發響之際衡量它;
Behold, suppose a bodily voice begins to sound, and it sounds, and still it sounds, and behold it ceases, and now there is silence, and that voice is past and is no longer a voice. It was future before it sounded, and could not be measured, because it did not yet exist, and now it cannot be measured, because it already is not. Then, therefore, it could be measured, while it was sounding, because then there was something that could be measured. But even then it did not stand still; for it was going and passing away. Was it therefore the more measurable? For in passing it was being stretched out into some span of time by which it could be measured, since the present has no span. If, then, it was measurable then, behold, suppose another begins to sound, and still it sounds in continued tenor without any break: let us measure it while it sounds;
1:668
cum enim sonare cessauerit, iam praeterita erit et non erit, quae possit metiri. metiamur plane et dicamus, quanta sit. sed adhuc sonat nec metiri potest nisi ab initio Sui, quo sonare coepit, usque ad finem, quo desinit. ipsum quippe interuallum metimur ab aliquo initio usque ad aliquem finem. quapropter uox, quae numquam finita est, metiri non potest, ut dicatur, quam longa uel breuis sit, nec dici aut aequalis alicui aut ad aliquam simpla uel dupla uel quid aliud. cum autem finita fuerit, iam non erit. quo pacto igitur metiri poterit? et metimur tamen tempora, nec ea, quae nondum sunt, nec ea, quae iam non sunt, nec ea, quae nulla mora extenduntur, nec ea, quae terminos non habent.
因為當它停止發響時,它便已過去,那時將無物可被衡量了。那麼就讓我們明明地衡量它,並說出它有多長。但它仍在發響,而它若不從其開始發響的起點,到其停止的終點,便不能被衡量。因為我們所衡量的乃是那間隔本身,從某個起點到某個終點。所以一個從未終止的聲音便不能被衡量,無從說它有多長或多短,也不能稱它與另一個相等,或就另一個而言是單倍、雙倍或其他甚麼。然而當它終止時,它便已不存在。那麼,它怎能被衡量呢?然而我們確實衡量時間——既非那尚不存在的,也非那已不存在的,也非那毫無久暫可延展的,也非那沒有界限的。
for when it has ceased to sound, it will already be past, and there will be nothing that can be measured. Let us measure it plainly, then, and say how long it is. But it still sounds, and it cannot be measured save from its beginning, at which it began to sound, to its end, at which it ceases. For it is the interval itself that we measure, from some beginning to some end. Wherefore a voice that has never ended cannot be measured, so as to say how long or short it is, nor can it be called either equal to some other, or, with respect to some other, single or double or anything else. But when it shall have ended, it will already not be. In what way, then, will it be able to be measured? And yet we do measure times—neither those which do not yet exist, nor those which already are not, nor those which are stretched out by no duration, nor those which have no bounds.
1:669
nec futura ergo nec praeterita nec praesentia nec praetereuntia tempora metimur et metimur tamen tempora. Deus creator omnium: uersus iste octo syllabarum breuibus et longis alternat syllabis: quattuor itaque breues, prjma, tertia, quinta, septima, simplae sunt ad quattuor longas, secundam, quartam, sextam, octauam. hae singulae ad illas singulas duplum habent temporis; pronuntio et renuntio, et ita est, quantum sentitur sensu manifesto. quantum sensus manifestus est, breui syllaba longam metior eamque sentio habere bis tantum.
那麼,我們既不衡量將來的、也不衡量過去的、也不衡量現在的、也不衡量正在過去的時間,然而我們確實衡量時間。「Deus creator omnium」(神,萬有的創造者)——這一句八個音節的詩行,是長短音節交替的:所以那四個短音節,即第一、第三、第五、第七,相對於那四個長音節,即第二、第四、第六、第八,乃是單倍的。這些長音節每一個的時值,是那些短音節每一個的兩倍;我發出它們,又如此報告,事實也正是這樣,就明顯的感官所能察覺的而言。就明顯的感官所及,我藉短音節衡量長音節,並察覺它恰有兩倍之長。
Neither future, then, nor past, nor present, nor passing times do we measure, and yet we do measure times. 'Deus creator omnium'—this verse of eight syllables alternates short and long syllables: the four shorts, therefore, the first, third, fifth, and seventh, are single in relation to the four longs, the second, fourth, sixth, and eighth. Each of these has double the time of each of those; I pronounce them and report it, and so it is, as far as is perceived by manifest sense. As far as sense is manifest, I measure the long syllable by the short one, and I perceive it to have just twice as much.
1:670
sed cum altera post alteram sonat, si prior breuis, longa posterior, quomodo tenebo breuem et quomodo eam longae metiens applicabo, ut inueniam, quod bis tantum habeat, quandoquidem longa sonare non incipit, nisi breuis sonare destiterit? ipsamque longam num praesentem metior, quando nisi finitam non metior? eius enim finitio praeteritio est. quid ergo est, quod metior? ubi est qua metior breuis? ubi est longa quam metior? ambae sonuerunt, auolauerunt, praeterierunt, iam non sunt: et ego metior fidenterque respondeo, quantum exercitato sensu fiditur, illam simplam esse, illam duplam, in spatio scilicet temporis. neque hoc possum, nisi quia praeterierunt et finitae sunt.
但既然一個是在另一個之後發響,若是短的在先、長的在後,我怎能持住那短的,又怎能在衡量時將它應用於那長的,以致發現後者恰有兩倍之長呢?既然那長音節非等短音節停止發響,便不開始發響。難道我是把那長音節當作現在來衡量嗎?我若非把它當作已完結的,便不衡量它。但它的完結就是它的過去。那麼,我所衡量的究竟是甚麼?我藉以衡量的那短音節在哪裡?我所衡量的那長音節在哪裡?兩者都已發響、都已飛走、都已過去,如今都不存在了:然而我卻衡量,且就一個熟練的感官所可信任的程度,篤定地回答說:一個是單倍的,另一個是雙倍的——當然,是在一段時間的長度中。而我所以能如此,無非是因為它們已過去、已完結。
But since one sounds after another, if the short first, the long after, how shall I hold the short, and how shall I apply it in measuring to the long, so as to find that it has just twice as much, seeing that the long does not begin to sound unless the short has ceased to sound? And do I measure the long itself as present, when I do not measure it save as finished? But its finishing is its passing away. What, then, is it that I measure? Where is the short by which I measure? Where is the long that I measure? Both have sounded, have flown away, have passed, and now are not: and yet I measure, and confidently answer, as far as a practiced sense is trusted, that the one is single, the other double—in a span of time, that is. Nor can I do this, except because they have passed away and are finished.
1:671
non ergo ipsas, quae iam non sunt, sed aliquid in memoria mea metior, quod infixum manet. In te, anime meus, tempora mea metior. noli mihi obstrepere, quod est: noli tibi obstrepere turbis affectionum tuarum. in te, inquam, tempora metior. affectionem, quam res praetereuntes in te faciunt et, cum illae praeterierint, manet, ipsam metior praesentem, non ea quae praeterierunt, ut fieret; ipsam metior, cum tempora metior. ergo aut ipsa sunt tempora, aut non tempora metior.
所以我所衡量的,並非那些如今已不存在的音節本身,而是我記憶中某種固定存留之物。我的心哪,我是在你裡面衡量我的時間。不要向我喧嚷——這就是真理;不要因你眾多情感的紛擾而向你自己喧嚷。我說,我是在你裡面衡量時間。那正在過去的事物在你裡面所生的情感,當這些事物過去之後仍然存留,這存留的情感,作為現在,乃是我所衡量的,而非那些為要產生此情感而過去的事物;我所衡量的正是這情感,當我衡量時間時。所以,或者這些情感本身就是時間,或者我所衡量的便不是時間。
It is not, therefore, those very syllables, which now are not, that I measure, but something in my memory which remains fixed. In you, my mind, I measure my times. Do not make an uproar against me—that is the truth; do not make an uproar against yourself by the crowds of your affections. In you, I say, I measure times. The affection which passing things produce in you, and which remains when they have passed away, that very affection, present, I measure, not the things which passed away in order that it might be produced; that very affection I measure, when I measure times. Therefore either these affections are the times, or I do not measure times.
1:672
quid cum metimur silentia et dicimus illud silentium tantum tenuisse temporis, quantum illa uox tenuit, nonne cogitationem tendimus ad mensuram uocis, quasi sonaret, ut aliquid de interuallis silentiorum in spatio temporis renuntiare possimus? nam et uoce atque ore cessante peragimus cogitando carmina et uersus et quemque sermonem motionumque dimensiones quaslibet et de spatiis temporum, quantum illud ad illud sit, renuntiamus non aliter, ac si ea sonando diceremus.
那麼,當我們衡量靜默、並說某段靜默所持續的時間與某個聲音所持續的時間一樣多時,又怎麼說呢?我們豈不是把我們的思想伸展到那聲音的尺度,彷彿它正在發響,好叫我們能就靜默的間隔報告出在一段時間中的某些事嗎?因為即使在聲音與口都止息時,我們也藉思想行過詩篇、詩節、與任何言論,以及各種運動的尺度,並就時間的長度——這一段相對於那一段有多少——所作的報告,與我們若藉發聲說出它們時並無二致。
What of it, when we measure silences and say that a certain silence lasted as much time as a certain voice lasted? Do we not stretch our thought to the measure of the voice, as if it were sounding, so that we may be able to report something concerning the intervals of silences in a span of time? For even while voice and mouth are at rest, we go through, by thinking, poems and verses and any discourse, and dimensions of motions of any kind, and concerning the spans of times—how much this is in relation to that—we report no differently than if we were uttering them by sounding.
1:673
si uoluerit aliquis edere longiusculam uocem et constituerit praemeditando, quam longa futura sit, egit utique iste spatium temporis in silentio memoriaeque conmendans coepit edere illam uocem, quae sonat, donec ad propositum terminum perducatur: immo sonuit et sonabit; nam quod eius iam peractum est, utique sonuit, quod autem restat, sonabit atque ita peragitur, dum praesens intentio futurum in praeteritum traicit deminutione futuri crescente praeterito, donec consumptione futuri sit totum praeteritum. Sed quomodo minuitur aut consumitur futurum, quod nondum est, aut quomodo crescit praeteritum, quod iam non est, nisi quia in animo, qui illud agit, tria sunt?
若有人想要發出一個略為冗長的聲音,並藉預先思量先定好它要多長,那人必定已在靜默中經過了一段時間,且將之交託記憶,然後開始發出那聲音,它持續發響,直到被帶到所定的限度為止:不如說,它已響了、且將要響;因為它那已完成的部分必定已響過了,而那存留的部分將要響;如此它被進行下去,當現在的專注將將來輸送到過去,將來逐漸減少而過去逐漸增加,直到藉著將來的耗盡,全體成為過去。但那尚不存在的將來怎能被減少或耗盡,那已不存在的過去又怎能增加呢?無非是因為在那進行此事的心靈裡,有三者並存:
If anyone should wish to utter a somewhat lengthy sound and should determine beforehand by premeditation how long it is to be, that man has assuredly gone through a span of time in silence and, committing it to memory, has begun to utter that sound, which sounds until it is brought to the appointed limit: nay rather, it has sounded and it will sound; for that part of it which is already accomplished has assuredly sounded, but that which remains will sound; and thus it is carried through, while present attention conveys the future over into the past, the future being diminished and the past increased, until, by the consuming of the future, the whole becomes past. But how is the future diminished or consumed, which does not yet exist, or how does the past increase, which already is not, save because in the mind, which does this, there are three?
1:674
nam et expectat et adtendit et meminit, ut id quod expectat per id quod adtendit transeat in id quod meminerit. quis igitur negat futura nondum esse? sed tamen iam est in animo expectatio futurorum. et quis negat praeterita iam non esse? sed tamen est adhuc in animo memoria praeteritorum. et quis negat praesens tempus carere spatio, quia in puncto praeterit? sed tamen perdurat attentio, per quam pergat abesse quod aderit. non igitur longum tempus futurum, quod non est, sed longum futurum longa expectatio futuri est, neque longum praeteritum tempus, quod non est, sed longum praeteritum longa memoria praeteriti est. Dicturus sum canticum, quod noni:
因為它既期待、又專注、又記憶,好叫它所期待的,經過它所專注的,過入它所記憶的。那麼,有誰否認將來之事尚不存在呢?然而在心靈裡已有對將來之事的期待。又有誰否認過去之事如今已不存在呢?然而在心靈裡仍有對過去之事的記憶。又有誰否認現在的時間沒有長度,因它在一點上便過去呢?然而專注卻持續著,藉此那將成為現在之物便走向不在。所以那為長的,並非那不存在的將來時間,而那長久的將來乃是對將來的長久期待;那為長的,也並非那不存在的過去時間,而那長久的過去乃是對過去的長久記憶。我正要背誦一首我所熟悉的詩歌:
For it both expects and attends and remembers, so that what it expects may pass, through that which it attends to, into that which it remembers. Who, then, denies that future things do not yet exist? And yet there is already in the mind an expectation of future things. And who denies that past things are now no longer? And yet there is still in the mind a memory of past things. And who denies that present time lacks span, since it passes in a point? And yet attention endures, through which that which will be present goes on to be absent. It is not, then, future time that is long, which does not exist, but a long future is a long expectation of the future; nor is past time long, which does not exist, but a long past is a long memory of the past. I am about to recite a song that I know:
1:675
antequam incipiam, in totum expectatio mea tenditur, cum autem coepero, quantum ex illa in praeteritum decerpsero, tenditur et memoria mea, atque distenditur uita huius actionis meae in memoriam propter quod dixi et in expectationem propter quod dicturus sum: praesens tamen adest attentio mea, per quam traicitur quod erat futurum, ut fiat praeteritum. quod quanto magis agitur et agitur, tanto breuiata expectatione prolongatur memoria, donec tota expectatio consumatur, quum tota illa actio finita transierit in memoriam.
在我開始之前,我的期待乃伸展遍及全篇;但當我開始之後,無論我已將其中多少摘入過去,便也都伸展在我的記憶裡,而我這行動的生命便被延展:一方面進入記憶,因著我所已說的;另一方面進入期待,因著我所將要說的;然而我的專注是現在的,藉它那曾是將來的便被輸送過去而成為過去的。這事越是不斷地進行,期待便越被縮短,而記憶便越被延長,直到全部的期待被耗盡,那時那整個行動既已完結,便已過入記憶。
before I begin, my expectation is stretched out over the whole; but when I have begun, however much of it I have plucked off into the past is stretched out also in my memory, and the life of this action of mine is distended into memory on account of what I have said, and into expectation on account of what I am about to say; yet my attention is present, through which what was future is conveyed over to become past. And the more this is done and done, by so much, as expectation is shortened, is memory prolonged, until the whole expectation is consumed, when that whole action, finished, shall have passed over into memory.
1:676
et quod in toto cantico, hoc in singulis particulis eius fit atque in singulis syllabis eius, hoc in actione longiore, cuius forte particula est illud canticum, hoc in tota uita hominis, cuius partes sunt omnes actiones hominis, hoc in toto saeculo filiorum hominum, cuius partes sunt omnes uitae hominum.
凡在整首詩歌中所發生的,這事也發生在它每一個小段、每一個音節中;這也發生在那更長的行動中——那首詩歌或許就是它的一個小段;這也發生在人的全部生命中——人的一切行動都是它的部分;這也發生在世人眾子的整個世代中——眾人的一切生命都是它的部分。
And what takes place in the whole song, this takes place in each of its particles and in each of its syllables; this in the longer action, of which perhaps that song is a particle; this in the whole life of a man, of which all the actions of the man are parts; this in the whole age of the sons of men, of which all the lives of men are parts.
1:677
Sed quoniam melior est misericordia tua super uitas, ecce distentio est uita mea, et me suscepit dextera tua in domino meo, mediatore filio hominis inter te unum et nos multos, in multis per multa, ut per eum adprehendam, in quo et adprehensus sum, et a ueteribus diebus colligar sequens unum, praeterita oblitus, non in ea, quae futura et transitura sunt, sed in ea quae ante sunt non distentus, sed extentus, non secundum distentionem, sed secundum intentionem sequor ad palmam supernae uocationis, ubi audiam uocem laudis et contempler delectationem tuam nec uenientem nec praetereuntem. nunc uero anni mei in gemitibus, et tu solacium meum, domine, pater meus aeternus es;
但因你的慈愛比生命更美,看哪,我的生命乃是一種延展,而你的右手在我主裡扶持了我——那中保、人子,介於你這獨一者與我們眾多者之間,在許多事之中、藉著許多事——好叫我藉著他,得以把握那我也已被他把握的;又好叫我從我陳舊的歲月中被收聚,跟隨那獨一者,忘記背後的事,不向那將要來而要過去的事延展,乃向那在前的事伸展,不照著延展,乃照著定意;我向著上面召命之獎賞竭力直奔,在那裡我得以聽見讚美的聲音,並瞻仰你那既不來臨也不過去的美樂。但如今我的歲月在歎息中消逝,而你是我的安慰,主啊;你是我永遠的父;
But since your mercy is better than lives, behold, my life is a distension, and your right hand has upheld me in my Lord, the mediator, the Son of man, between you, the One, and us, the many—amid many things through many things—that through him I may apprehend in whom I have also been apprehended, and may be gathered up from my old days, following the One, forgetting the things that are past, not distended toward the things that are to come and pass away, but extended toward the things that are before, not according to distension but according to intention; I press on toward the prize of the supernal calling, where I may hear the voice of praise and contemplate your delight, which neither comes nor passes away. But now my years are spent in groaning, and you are my consolation, O Lord; you are my eternal Father;
1:678
at ego in tempora dissilui, quorum ordinem nescio, et tumultuosis uarietatibus dilaniantur cogitationes meae, intima uiscera animae meae, donec in te confluam purgatus et liquidus igne amoris tui. Et stabo atque solidabor in te, in forma mea, ueritate tua, nec patiar quaestiones hominum, qui poenali morbo plus sitiunt, quam capiunt, et dicunt: "quid faciebat deus, antequam faceret caelum et terram?" aut "quid ei uenit in mentem, ut aliquid faceret, cum antea numquam aliquid fecerit?" da illis, domine, bene cogitare, quid dicant, et inuenire, quia non dicitur numquam, ubi non est tempus. qui ergo dicitur numquam fecisse, quid aliud dicitur nisi ; nullo tempore fecisse?
但我卻被碎裂分散在諸時之中,其次序我不得而知,而我的思緒、我靈魂至深的肺腑,被紛亂的雜多所撕裂,直到我被你愛的火潔淨而澄清,得以一同匯流入你裡面。我必站立,並在你裡面被堅固,在我的型範、你的真理裡;我也不必再忍受世人的詰問——他們因刑罰性的疾病,渴慕的多過所能容受的,且說:「神在造天地之先做甚麼?」或「他既在先從未造過甚麼,怎會心血來潮要造甚麼呢?」主啊,求你賜給他們能好好思想自己所說的,並能發覺:在無時間之處,便不能說「從未」。所以那被說成「從未造過」的,除了「在無時間中造過」之外,還能是甚麼意思呢?
but I have been shattered apart into times, whose order I do not know, and my thoughts, the inmost bowels of my soul, are torn asunder by tumultuous varieties, until I may flow together into you, purified and made limpid by the fire of your love. And I shall stand and be made firm in you, in my mold, your truth; nor shall I endure the questions of men, who by a penal disease thirst for more than they can hold, and who say, 'What was God doing before he made heaven and earth?' or 'What came into his mind, that he should make something, since before he had never made anything?' Grant to them, O Lord, to think well what they say, and to find that 'never' is not said where there is no time. He, therefore, who is said never to have made, what else is meant but that he made at no time?
1:679
uideant itaque nullum tempus esse posse sine creatura et desinant istam uanitatem loqui. extendantur etiam in ea, quae ante sunt, et intellegant te ante omnia tempora aeternum creatorem omnium temporum neque ulla tempora tibi esse coaeterna nec ullam creaturam, etiamsi est aliqua supra tempora. Domine deus meus, quis ille sinus est alti secreti tui et quam longe inde me proiecerunt consequentia delictorum meorum? sana oculos meos, et congaudeam luci tuae.
所以願他們看見:沒有受造之物,便不能有時間,並願他們止住,不再說那虛妄的話。也願他們向那在前的事被伸展,並明白:在萬時之先,你是萬時永遠的創造者,沒有任何時間與你同為永遠,也沒有任何受造之物與你同永——縱使有某種受造之物在諸時之上。主我的神啊,你那深邃隱密的內室是何等的所在,而我罪過的後果又把我拋擲到離它何等遙遠之處呢?求你醫治我的眼睛,叫我得以在你的光中一同歡欣。
Let them therefore see that no time can exist without a creature, and let them cease to speak that vanity. Let them also be extended toward the things that are before, and let them understand that you, before all times, are the eternal Creator of all times, and that no times are coeternal with you, nor any creature, even if there be some creature above times. O Lord my God, what is that recess of your deep secret, and how far away from it have the consequences of my offenses cast me? Heal my eyes, that I may rejoice together in your light.
1:680
certe si est tam grandi scientia et praescientia pollens animus, cui cuncta praeterita et futura ita nota sint, sicut mihi unum canticum notissimum, nimium mirabilis est animus iste atque ad horrorem stupendus, quippe quem ita non lateat quidquid peractum et quidquid relicum saeculorum est, quemadmodum me non latet cantantem illud canticum, quid et quantum eius abierit ab exordio, quid et quantum restet ad finem. sed absit, ut tu, conditor uniuersitatis, conditor animarum et corporum, absit, ut ita noueris omnia futura et praeterita. longe tu, longe mirabilius longeque secretius.
誠然,若有一個心靈被賦予如此宏大的知識與預知,以致一切過去與將來之事,對它都如同一首詩歌之於我那樣最為熟悉,那心靈便極為奇妙、令人驚駭到敬畏的地步,因為無論諸世代中已成就的、或所存留的甚麼,都不向它隱藏,正如當我歌唱那詩歌時,它從起頭已過去了甚麼、過去了多少,到末了還存留甚麼、存留多少,都不向我隱藏。但斷然不可如此設想:你這宇宙的締造者、靈魂與身體的締造者,斷不可說你是這樣認識一切將來與過去之事。你認識它們的方式,遠為不同、遠為奇妙、遠為隱密。
Certainly, if there is a mind endowed with such great knowledge and foreknowledge that all things past and future are as known to it as one song is most familiar to me, that mind is exceedingly marvelous and astonishing to the point of awe, in that nothing of whatever has been accomplished and whatever remains of the ages is hidden from it, even as, while I sing that song, there is not hidden from me what and how much of it has gone by from the beginning, what and how much remains until the end. But far be it that you, the Maker of the universe, the Maker of souls and bodies, far be it that you should thus know all things future and past. Far otherwise, far more marvelously, and far more secretly do you know them.
1:681
neque enim sicut nota cantantis notumne canticum audientis expectatione uocum futurarum et memoria praeteritarum uariatur affectus sensusque distenditur, ita tibi aliquid accidit inconmutabiliter aeterno, hoc est uere aeterno creatori mentium. sicut ergo nosti in principio cae - 1 u m et terram sine uarietate notitiae tuae, ita fecisti in principio caelum et terram sine distinctione actionis tuae. qui intellegit, confiteatur tibi, et qui non intellegit, confiteatur tibi. o quam excelsus es, et humiles corde sunt domus tua! tu enim erigis elisos, et non cadunt quorum celsitudo tu es.
因為這並不像一個熟悉歌曲的人,他的情感因期待將來的音符和記憶過去的音符而有所變動,他的知覺也因此被拉長;對於你卻沒有這樣的事發生,你是不變的永恆者,就是那真正永恆的、眾心靈的創造主。所以,正如你在起初認識天地,毫無你知識上的變動,照樣你在起初造了天地,毫無你行動上的區分。明白的人,讓他向你承認讚美;不明白的人,也讓他向你承認讚美。哦,你是何等崇高,然而心裏謙卑的人卻是你的居所!因為你扶起被打倒的人,那些以你為高處的人必不跌倒。
For it is not as with one who knows a song, whose affection is varied and whose perception is stretched out by the expectation of notes to come and the memory of notes gone by; not so does anything happen to you, who are unchangeably eternal, that is, the truly eternal Creator of minds. Therefore, just as in the beginning you knew heaven and earth without any variation in your knowing, so in the beginning you made heaven and earth without any distinction in your acting. Let him who understands confess to you, and let him who does not understand confess to you. O how exalted you are, and yet the humble of heart are your dwelling! For you lift up those who are cast down, and they whose loftiness you are do not fall.
1:682
Multa satagit cor meum, domine, in hac inopia uitae meae pulsatum uerbis sanctae scripturae tuae, et ideo plerumque in sermone copiosa est egestas humanae intellegentiae, quia plus loquitur inquisitio quam inuentio et longior est petitio quam inpetratio et operosior est manus pulsans quam sumens. tenemus promissum: quis corrumpet illud? si deus pro nobis, quis contra nos? petite, et accipietis; quaerite, et innenietis; pulsate, et aperietur uobis. omnis enim, qui petit, accipit et quaerens inueniet et pulsanti aperietur. promissa tua sunt, et quis falli timeat, cum promittit ueritas?
主啊,在我這貧乏的人生中,我的心忙於許多事,被你聖經的話語所擊動;因此人的悟性在言談中大多富於貧乏,因為探求多於發現,祈求長於得著,叩門的手比領受的手更費力。然而我們持守那應許:誰能使它落空呢?神若幫助我們,誰能敵擋我們呢?祈求,就給你們;尋找,就尋見;叩門,就給你們開門。因為凡祈求的就得著,尋找的就尋見,叩門的就給他開門。這些都是你的應許,當真理應許時,誰還怕受欺呢?
My heart is busy with many things, O Lord, in this neediness of my life, being struck by the words of your holy Scripture; and therefore for the most part human understanding is rich only in its poverty when it speaks, because inquiry speaks more than discovery, and the asking is longer than the obtaining, and the hand that knocks toils harder than the hand that receives. Yet we hold the promise: who shall corrupt it? If God be for us, who can be against us? Ask, and you shall receive; seek, and you shall find; knock, and it shall be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it shall be opened. These are your promises, and who could fear to be deceived, when it is Truth that promises?
1:683
Confitetur altitudini tuae humilitas linguae meae, quoniiam tu fecisti caelum et terram, hoc caelum, quod uideo, terramque, quam calco, unde est haec terra, quam porto. tu fecisti. sed ubi est caelum caeli, domine, de quo audiuimus in uoce psalmi: caelum caeli domino: terram autem dedit filiis hominum? ubi es, caelum, quod non cernimus, cui terra est hoc omne, quod cernimus? hoc enim totum corporeum non ubique totum ita cepit speciem pulchram in nouissimis, cuius fundus est terra nostra, sed ad illud caelum caeli etiam terrae nostrae caelum terra est. et hoc utrumque magnum corpus non absurde terra est ad illud nescio quale caelum, quod domino est, non filiis hominum.
我舌頭的卑微向你的崇高承認讚美,承認你造了天地——這我所看見的天,和我所踐踏的地,就是我所承載的這地的由來。是你造的。但主啊,那天上的天在哪裏呢?我們曾在詩篇的聲音中聽見:天上的天屬於耶和華,地卻賜給了世人。你在哪裏呢,那我們所看不見的天?相對於你,我們所看見的這一切都是地。因為這整個有形之物,並非處處是完整的整體,乃是在其最低處得了其美麗的形體,這形體的根基就是我們的地;但相對於那天上的天,連我們這地之天也不過是地。這兩個巨大的物體,相對於那屬乎主、而非屬乎世人的、我不知如何形容的天,被稱為地並非荒謬。
The lowliness of my tongue confesses to your loftiness, that you made heaven and earth—this heaven which I see, and the earth on which I tread, from which comes this earth that I bear about with me. You made it. But where is the heaven of heaven, O Lord, of which we have heard in the voice of the psalm: The heaven of heaven is the Lord's, but the earth he has given to the sons of men? Where are you, O heaven which we do not behold, to which all this is earth that we do behold? For this whole bodily creation, not everywhere a complete whole, has received its beautiful form in its lowest parts, of which the foundation is our earth; but in relation to that heaven of heaven, even the heaven of our earth is but earth. And both these great bodies are not absurdly called earth in relation to that I-know-not-what heaven which belongs to the Lord, not to the sons of men.
1:684
Et nimirum haec terra erat inuisibilis et inconposita et nescio qua profunditas abyssi, super quam non erat lux, quia nulla species erat illi: unde iussisti, ut scriberetur, quod tenebrae erant super abyssum; quid aliud quam lucis absentia? ubi enim lux esset, si esset, nisi super esset eminendo et inlustrando? ubi ergo lux nondum erat, quid erat adesse tenebras nisi abesse lucem? super itaque erant tenebrae, quia super lux aberat, sicut sonus ubi non est, silentium est. et quid est esse ibi silentium nisi sonum ibi non esse? nonne tu, domine, docuisti hanc animam, quae tibi conStetur ?
毫無疑問,這地是不可見、未成形的,並有我不知如何形容的深淵之底,其上沒有光,因為它全然沒有形體;所以你吩咐人記下,黑暗籠罩著深淵。這黑暗豈不就是光的缺乏?因為光若存在,豈不是藉著在上、藉著籠罩並照亮才成為光的麼?那麼,在光尚未存在之處,黑暗的臨在豈不就是光的缺席?所以黑暗在上,因為在上的光缺席,正如哪裏沒有聲音,哪裏就是寂靜。在那裏有寂靜,豈不就是在那裏沒有聲音?主啊,這向你承認讚美的靈魂,豈不是你所教導的麼?
And without doubt this earth was invisible and unformed, and there was an I-know-not-what depth of the abyss over which there was no light, because it had no form at all; whence you commanded it to be written that darkness was over the abyss. What is that but the absence of light? For where would light be, if it were, save by being above, by overshadowing and illuminating? Where, then, light was not yet, what was it for darkness to be present but for light to be absent? Therefore darkness was above, because light above was absent—just as where sound is not, there is silence. And what is it for silence to be there but for sound not to be there? Have you not, O Lord, taught this soul which confesses to you?
1:685
nonne tu, domine, docuisti me, quod priusquam istam informem materiam formares atque distingueres, non erat aliquid, non color non figura, non corpus, non spiritus? non tamen omnino nihil: erat quaedam informitas sine ulla specie. Quid ergo uocaretur, quo etiam sensu tardioribus atcumque insinuaretur, nisi usitato aliquo uocabulo? quid autem in omnibus mundi partibus reperiri potest propinquius informitati omnimodae quam terra et abyssus? minus enim speciosa sunt pro suo gradu infimo quam cetera superiora perlucida et luculenta omnia.
主啊,你豈不曾教導我:在你形塑並整理那無形之質料以先,並無一物——沒有顏色、沒有形狀、沒有形體、沒有靈麼?然而也並非全然虛無:有某種無形之物,毫無任何形體。那麼它能用甚麼名稱來稱呼,好叫遲鈍的心思也能略略領會,除非用某個熟悉的字眼?在世界一切的部分中,還有甚麼比地與深淵更接近那全然的無形呢?因為按其最低的等級,它們比其他一切在上、透明而明亮之物更不美麗。
Have you not, O Lord, taught me that before you formed and set in order that formless matter, there was nothing—no color, no figure, no body, no spirit? Yet not utterly nothing: there was a certain formlessness without any form. By what name, then, could it be called, so that it might somehow be conveyed even to slower minds, except by some familiar word? And what in all the parts of the world can be found nearer to utter formlessness than earth and abyss? For according to their lowest rank they are less comely than all the other higher things that are translucent and shining.
1:686
cur ergo non accipiam informitatem materiae, quam sine specie feceras, unde speciosum mundum faceres, ita conmode hominibus intimatarn , ut appellaretur terra inuisibilis et inconposita, ut, cum in ea quaerit cogitatio, quid sensus attingat, et dicit sibi: "non est intellegibilis forma sicut uita, sicut iustitia, quia materies est corporum, neque sensibilis, quoniam quid uideatur et quid sentiatur in inuisibili et inconposita non est", dum sibi haec dicit humana cogitatio, conetur eam uel nosse ignorando uel ignorare noscendo?
那麼,我為何不接受:你所造的、那無形的質料之無形性——你用它造出美麗的世界——竟如此恰當地傳達給人,以致被稱為不可見、未成形的地?這樣,當思想在其中尋求感官所能觸及之物,並對自己說:「這不是可理解的形體,如生命、如公義,因它是物體的質料;也不是可感知的,因在不可見、未成形之中,沒有甚麼可看見或可感覺」——當人的思想對自己這樣說時,它或可藉著無知而設法認識它,或藉著認識而設法無知於它?
Why, then, should I not accept that the formlessness of the matter which you had made without form, out of which you might make a comely world, was so suitably conveyed to men that it should be called earth invisible and unformed—so that, when thought seeks in it what the senses may reach, and says to itself, 'It is not an intelligible form, like life, like justice, since it is the matter of bodies; nor is it sensible, since in the invisible and unformed there is nothing to be seen or felt'—while human thought says these things to itself, it may strive either to know it by being ignorant of it, or to be ignorant of it by knowing it?
1:687
Ego uero, domine, si totum confitear tibi ore meo et calamo meo, quidquid de ista materia docuisti me, cuius antea nomen audiens et non intellegens narrantibus mihi eis, qui non intellegerent, eam cum speciebus innumeris et uariis cogitabam et ideo non eam cogitabam; foedas et horribiles formas perturbatis ordinibus uoluebat animus, sed formas tamen, et informe appellabam non quod careret forma, sed quod talem haberet, ut, si appareret, insolitum et incongruum auersaretur sensus meus et conturbaretur infirmitas hominis;
主啊,至於我,我若要用口和筆向你承認你所教導我關於這質料的一切——我從前聽過它的名字卻不明白,是從那些向我述說的人聽來的,而他們自己也不明白;我那時用無數又繁雜的形體去想像它,因此其實根本沒有想像到它:我的心思不斷在混亂的次序中翻轉著污穢可怖的形狀,但畢竟仍是形狀;我所稱為無形的,並非指它缺乏形體,乃指它具有這樣一種形體,以致它若顯現出來,我的感官必因其反常而不協調而厭棄它,人的軟弱也必為之惶亂;
But as for me, O Lord, if I should confess to you with my mouth and my pen all that you have taught me concerning this matter—whose name I formerly heard without understanding it, from those who told me of it and who did not understand it either, while I imagined it with countless and varied forms, and therefore did not imagine it at all: my mind kept turning over foul and horrible shapes in disordered ranks, yet shapes nonetheless; and I called formless not what lacked form, but what had such a form that, were it to appear, my senses would turn away from it as something unwonted and incongruous, and man's weakness would be confounded;
1:688
uerum autem illud quod cogitabam non priuatione omnis formae, sed conparatione formosiorum erat informe, et suadebat uera ratio, ut omnis formae qualescumque reliquias omnino detraherem, si uellem prorsus informe cogitare et non poteram; citius enim non esse censebam, quod omni forma priuaretur, quam cogitabam quiddam inter formam et nihil nec formatum nec nihil, informe prope nihil;
然而我所構想的那物,並非因缺乏一切形體而為無形,乃是相比於更美之物而為無形;真確的理性催促我,若要構想那絕對的無形,就當把所殘留的任何形體痕跡全然剝除——可是我做不到;因為我判斷,那被剝奪一切形體之物,與其說是介於形體與虛無之間、既非已成形亦非虛無、近乎虛無的無形之物,倒不如說它根本不存在更為妥當;
but that which I was conceiving was formless not by the privation of all form, but by comparison with more beautiful things; and true reason urged me to strip away utterly whatever remnants of form of any kind remained, if I wished to conceive the absolutely formless—and I could not; for I judged that what was deprived of all form would sooner not exist at all than that I should conceive something between form and nothing, neither formed nor nothing, formless and next to nothing;
1:689
et cessauit mens mea interrogare hinc spiritum meum plenum imaginibus formatorum corporum et eas pro arbitrio mutantem atque uariantem, et intendi in ipsa corpora eorumque mutabilitatem altius inspexi, qua desinunt esse quod fuerant et incipiunt esse quod non erant, eundemque transitum de forma in formam per informe quiddam fieri suspicatus sum, non per omnino nihil: sed nosse cupiebam, non suspicari —: et si totum tibi confiteatur uox et stilus meus, quidquid de ista quaestione enodasti mihi, quis legentium capere durabit? nec ideo tamen cessabit cor meum tibi dare honorem et canticum laudis de his, quae dictare non sufficit.
於是我的心思在此事上不再質問我自己的靈——它充滿了已成形之物的影像,並隨意改變、變換這些影像;我轉而專注於那些物體本身,更深地察看它們的可變性:藉此可變性,它們不再是先前所是的,並開始成為先前所不是的;我猜想,這從一個形體到另一個形體的過渡,是藉著某種無形之物,而非藉著全然的虛無。但我渴望認識,而非僅僅猜想。我的口和筆即或要向你承認你為我所解開關於此問題的一切,讀者中又有誰能領會呢?然而我的心也不因此停止向你獻上尊榮和讚美之歌,論到那些它無力以言語表達的事。
and my mind ceased to question on this matter my own spirit, which was full of the images of formed bodies and changed and varied them at will; and I directed my attention to the bodies themselves, and looked more deeply into their mutability, by which they cease to be what they had been and begin to be what they were not; and I suspected that this passage from form to form takes place through a certain formlessness, not through utter nothing. But I longed to know, not merely to suspect. And if my voice and my pen should confess to you all that you have unraveled for me concerning this question, who among my readers will endure to grasp it? Yet not for that reason shall my heart cease to give you honor and a song of praise concerning those things which it is not able to put into words.
1:690
mutabilitas enim rerum mutabilium ipsa capax est formarum omnium, in quas mutantur res mutabiles. et haec quid est? numquid animus? numquid corpus? numquid species animi uel corporis? si dici posset: nihil aliquid et: est non est, hoc eam dicerem; et tamen iam utcumque erat, ut species caperet istas uisibiles et conpositas. Et unde utcumque erat, ut species caperet istas nisibiles et conpositas, et unde utcumque erat, nisi esset abs te, a quo sunt omnia, in quantumcumque sunt? sed tanto a te longius, quanto dissimilius: neque enim locis.
因為可變之物的可變性本身,能容受可變之物所變成的一切形體。這可變性是甚麼呢?難道是心靈?難道是物體?難道是心靈或物體的外觀?若能說「無中之有」、「它是又它不是」,我就如此稱呼它;然而它畢竟已經以某種方式存在,好叫它能容受這些可見而複合的形體。它究竟是從何而來、以某種方式而存在,好容受這些可見而複合的形體?它究竟以某種方式從何而有,若非從你而來——萬有都從你而出,凡有所是的,都按其所是的程度從你而出?然而它離你越遠,就越不像你——因為這並非藉著空間的距離。
For the mutability of mutable things is itself capable of all those forms into which mutable things are changed. And what is this mutability? Is it mind? Is it body? Is it the appearance of mind or of body? If it could be said, 'a nothing-something,' and 'it is, it is not,' I would call it that; and yet it already in some way was, that it might receive these visible and composite forms. And whence was it, in whatever way it was, that it might receive these visible and composite forms, and whence was it at all, in whatever way it was, except from you, from whom are all things, in whatever measure they are? But the more unlike you, the farther from you—for not by places.
1:691
itaque tu, domine, qui non es alias aliud et alias aliter, sed id ipsum et id ipsum, sanctus, sanctus, sanctus, dominus deus omnipotens, in principio, quod est de te, in sapientia tua, quae nata est de substantia tua, fecisti aliquid et de nihilo. fecisti enim caelum et terram non de te: nam esset aequale unigenito tuo ac per hoc et tibi, et nullo modo iustum esset, ut aequale tibi esset, quod de te non esset. et aliud praeter te non erat, unde faceres ea, deus, una trinitas et trina unitas: et ideo de nihilo fecisti caelum et terram, magnum quiddam et paruum quiddam, quoniam omnipotens et bonus es ad facienda omnia bona, magnum caelum et paruam terram.
所以你,主啊,你並非此時是這樣、彼時是那樣,乃是那同一者、那同一者,聖哉、聖哉、聖哉,主神,全能者,你在那「起初」中——那起初是出於你,在你的智慧中,這智慧是從你的本質所生的——造了某物,並且是從無造的。因為你造天地並非出於你自己:否則它就與你的獨生子同等,因此也與你同等;那不是出於你的,若與你同等,斷不公義。除你以外也沒有別的,使你可用以造成它們,神啊,你是獨一的三一、又是三而合一的獨一:所以你從無造了天地,一個大物與一個小物,因為你是全能、又善於造成一切美善之物,造了大天與小地。
And so you, O Lord, who are not at one time one thing and at another time another, but the selfsame and the selfsame, holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, in the Beginning, which is of you, in your Wisdom, which was born of your substance, made something, and out of nothing. For you made heaven and earth not out of yourself: for then it would be equal to your only-begotten Son, and through this also to you; and in no way would it be just that what was not of you should be equal to you. And there was nothing else besides you out of which you might make them, O God, one Trinity and triune Unity: and therefore out of nothing you made heaven and earth, a great thing and a small thing, since you are almighty and good to make all things good, a great heaven and a small earth.
1:692
tu eras et aliud nihil, unde fecisti caelum et terram, duo quaedam, unum prope te, alterum prope nihil, unum, quo superior tu esses, alterum, quo inferius nihil esset. Sed illud caelum caeli tibi, domine; terra autem, quam dedisti filiis hominum cernendam atque tangendam, non erat talis, qualem nunc cernimus et tangimus. inuisibilis enim erat et inconposita et abyssus erat, super quam non erat lux, aut tenebrae erant super abyssum, id est magis quam in abysso. ista quippe abyssus aquarum iam uisibilium etiam in profundis suis habet speciei suae lucem utcumque sensibilem piscibus et repentibus in suo fundo animantibus: illud autem totum prope nihil erat, quoniam adhuc omnino informe erat;
你存在,再無別物,使你可用以造天地,這兩樣事物:一樣近乎你,另一樣近乎虛無;一樣有惟你在其上更為崇高,另一樣有虛無在其下。但那天上的天屬於你,主啊;至於你所賜給世人觀看和觸摸的地,卻不像我們如今所觀看、所觸摸的。因為它是不可見、未成形的,並有深淵在那裏,其上沒有光,或說黑暗籠罩深淵,就是說比在深淵之中更甚。因為這如今可見的水之深淵,連在其深處也有屬乎其外觀的光,多少能被那住在其底、游動爬行的活物所感知;但那整體卻近乎虛無,因它仍全然無形;
You were, and there was nothing else, out of which you made heaven and earth, two certain things: one near to you, the other near to nothing; one above which you alone were higher, the other below which there was nothing. But that heaven of heaven is for you, O Lord; the earth, however, which you gave to the sons of men to behold and to touch, was not such as we now behold and touch. For it was invisible and unformed, and there was an abyss over which there was no light, or darkness was over the abyss, that is, more so than in the abyss. For this abyss of waters, now visible, has even in its depths a light proper to its appearance, somehow perceptible to the fish and creeping things that live on its floor; but that whole was near to nothing, since it was still entirely formless;
1:693
iam tamen erat, quod formari poterat. tu enim, domine, fecisti mundum de materia informi, quam fecisti de nulla re paene nullam rem, unde faceres magna, quae miramur filii hominum. ualde hoc mirabile caelum corporeum, quod firmamentum inter aquam et aquam secundo die post conditionem lucis dixisti: fiat, et sic est factum. quod firmamentum uocasti caelum, sed caelum terrae huius et maris, quae fecisti tertio die dando speciem uisibilem informi materiae, quam fecisti ante omnem diem. iam enim feceras et caelum ante omnem diem, sed caelum caeli huius, quia in principio feceras caelum et terram.
然而它已經是某種能被賦予形體之物。因為你,主啊,從無形的質料造了世界,這質料你是從無物造成近乎無物,好叫你能用它造出那些我們世人所驚歎的偉大之物。這有形的天確是極其奇妙,就是水與水之間的穹蒼,你在第二日,在光的奠定之後,說:要有這穹蒼,事就這樣成了。這穹蒼你稱為天——但這是你在第三日所造的這地與海之天,那時你將可見的形體賜給那在任何日子以先你所造的無形質料。因為你已經在任何日子以先造了天,就是這天上之天,因為你在起初造了天地。
yet it already was something that could be formed. For you, O Lord, made the world out of formless matter, which you made out of no thing into almost no thing, that out of it you might make those great things at which we, the sons of men, marvel. For very marvelous is this bodily heaven, the firmament between water and water, which on the second day, after the founding of light, you said: Let it be made, and so it was made. This firmament you called heaven—but the heaven of this earth and sea, which you made on the third day, by giving a visible form to the formless matter which you had made before any day. For you had already made heaven before any day, but the heaven of this heaven, because in the beginning you had made heaven and earth.
1:694
terra autem ipsa, quam feceras, informis materies erat, quia inuisibilis erat et inconposita et tenebrae super abyssum: de qua terra inuisibili et inconposita, de qua informitate, de quo paene nihilo faceres haec omnia, quibus iste mutabilis mundus constat et non constat, in quo ipsa mutabilitas apparet, in qua sentiri et dinumerari possunt tempora, quia rerum mutationibus fiunt tempora, dum uariantur et uertuntur species, quarum materies praedicta est terra inuisibilis. Ideoque spiritus, doctor famuli tui, cum te conmemorat fecisse in principio caelum et terram, tacet de temporibus, silet de diebus.
但那你所造的地本身乃是無形的質料,因為它是不可見、未成形的,並有黑暗籠罩深淵:你正是要從這不可見、未成形的地,從這無形性,從這近乎虛無之物,造出這一切之物——這可變的世界由此而成、卻又不成;它的可變性正顯於其中,時間可在其中被感知、被數算,因為時間是藉著萬物的變化而生的,當其形體變動轉換之時,而這些形體的質料就是前面所說那不可見的地。所以那靈,你僕人的教師,當他記述你在起初造了天地時,對時間緘默不言,對日子也沉默不語。
But the earth itself, which you had made, was formless matter, because it was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss: out of which earth, invisible and unformed, out of which formlessness, out of which almost-nothing, you were to make all these things of which this mutable world consists and yet does not consist—wherein its very mutability appears, in which times can be perceived and numbered, because times come to be through the changes of things, while their forms are varied and turned about, whose matter is the aforesaid invisible earth. And therefore the Spirit, the teacher of your servant, when he recalls that you made heaven and earth in the beginning, is silent about times, says nothing of days.
1:695
nimirum enim caelum caeli, quod in principio fecisti, creatura est aliqua intellectualis, quamquam nequaquam tibi, trinitati, coaeterna, particeps tamen aeternitatis tuae, ualde mutabilitatem suam prae dulcedine felicissimae contemplationis tuae cohibet et sine ullo lapsu ex quo facta est inhaerendo tibi excedit omnem uolubilem uicissitudinem temporum. ista uero informitas, terra inuisibilis et inconposita, nec ipsa in diebus numerata est. ubi enim nulla species, nullus ordo, nec uenit quicquam et praeterit, et ubi hoc non fit, non sunt utique dies nec uicissitudo spatiorum temporalium. 0 ueritas, lumen cordis mei, non tenebrae meae loquantur mihi.
因為那天上的天,就是你在起初所造的,無疑乃是某種屬靈悟性的受造之物,它雖絕不與你這三一同永,卻是你永恆性的分享者;藉著對你那至福之默觀的甘甜,它大大約束自己的可變性,並且自被造以來毫無墮落,藉著緊靠你,超越了時間一切流轉的更替。但那無形性,就是那不可見、未成形的地,本身並未被數算在那些日子之內。因為哪裏沒有形體、沒有次序,就沒有甚麼來去更迭;哪裏沒有這樣的更迭,那裏就斷然沒有日子,也沒有時間段落的交替。哦真理,我心中的光,別讓我自己的黑暗對我說話。
For without doubt that heaven of heaven, which you made in the beginning, is some intellectual creature, which, although in no way coeternal with you, the Trinity, is nonetheless a partaker of your eternity; and through the sweetness of its most blessed contemplation of you, it strongly restrains its own mutability, and without any lapse since it was made, by cleaving to you, transcends every rolling vicissitude of times. But that formlessness, the earth invisible and unformed, was not itself numbered among the days. For where there is no form, no order, nothing comes and passes away; and where this does not happen, there are surely no days nor any succession of temporal spaces. O Truth, light of my heart, let not my own darkness speak to me.
1:696
defluxi ad ista et obscuratus sum, sed hinc, etiam hinc adamaui te. erraui et recordatus sum tui. audiui uocem tuam post me, ut redirem, et uix audiui propter tumultus inpacatorum. et nunc ecce redeo aestuans et anhelans ad fontem tuum. nemo me prohibeat: hunc bibam et hunc uiuam. non ego uita mea sim: male nixi ex me, mors mihi fui: in te reuiuesco . tu me alloquere, tu mihi sermocinare. credidi libris tuis, et uerba eorum arcana ualde. iam dixisti mihi, domine, uoce forti in aurem interiorem. quia tu aeternus es, solus habens inmortalitatem, quoniam ex nulla specie motuue mutaris nec temporibus uariatur uoluntas tua, quia non est immortalis uoluntas, quae alia et alia est.
我流落到這些低下之物,便昏暗了;但正從這裏,甚至從這裏,我熱切地愛了你。我曾偏離,又想起了你。我聽見你的聲音在我背後,呼喚我回轉,我卻因那些不安之輩的喧囂而幾乎聽不見。如今看哪,我焦灼喘息地回到你的泉源。誰也不要攔阻我:讓我飲於這泉,靠這泉而活。別讓我作自己的生命:我憑己而活實在邪惡,我成了自己的死亡;在你裏面我重新復活。求你對我說話,與我交談。我信了你的書卷,其中的話語乃是極深的奧祕。主啊,你已用大聲在我的內耳對我說,你是永恆的,惟獨你有不死,因你不被任何形體或運動所改變,你的旨意也不因時間而變動——因為那時而這樣、時而那樣的旨意並非不死的。
I flowed away to these lower things and was darkened; but from this place, even from this, I have loved you ardently. I went astray and remembered you. I heard your voice behind me, calling me to return, and I barely heard it because of the tumult of the unquiet. And now, behold, I return, burning and panting, to your fountain. Let no one hold me back: let me drink of this and live by this. Let me not be my own life: evilly did I live of myself, I was death to myself; in you I revive again. Speak to me, converse with me. I have believed your books, and their words are very deep mysteries. Already you have said to me, O Lord, with a strong voice in my inner ear, that you are eternal, alone possessing immortality, since you are changed by no form or motion, nor is your will varied by times—for that will is not immortal which is now one thing and now another.
1:697
hoc in conspectu tuo claret mihi et magis magisque clarescat, oro te, atque in ea manifestatione persistam sobrius sub alis tuis. item dixisti mihi, domine, uoce forti in aurem interiorem, quod omnes naturas atque substantias, quae non sunt quod tu es et tamen sunt, tu fecisti\': hoc solum a te non est, quod non est; motusque uoluntatis a te, qui es, ad id quod minus est, quia talis motus delictum atque peccatum est, et quod nullius peccatum aut tibi nocet aut perturbat ordinem imperii tui uel in primo uel in imo. hoc in conspectu tuo claret mihi et magis magisque clarescat, oro te, atque in ea manifestatione persistam sobrius sub alis tuis.
這在你眼前向我顯明,求你叫它越發明亮、越發清晰,並在那顯明中讓我清醒地存留在你的翅膀蔭下。照樣,主啊,你已用大聲在我的內耳對我說,凡不是你之所是、卻又存在的一切性質與本體,都是你所造的:惟有一物不是出於你,就是那不存在的;以及那意志離開你這「自有者」、轉向那更次之物的運動——因為這樣的運動乃是過犯與罪;而無論誰的罪,都不能損害你,也不能擾亂你治理之國度的次序,無論在至高或在至低之處。這在你眼前向我顯明,求你叫它越發明亮、越發清晰,並在那顯明中讓我清醒地存留在你的翅膀蔭下。
This is clear to me in your sight, and let it grow ever clearer and clearer, I pray you, and in that manifestation let me persist soberly under your wings. Likewise you have said to me, O Lord, with a strong voice in my inner ear, that you made all natures and substances which are not what you are and yet exist: this alone is not from you, namely, that which does not exist; and the motion of the will away from you, who are, toward that which is less—because such a motion is a fault and a sin; and the sin of no one either harms you or disturbs the order of your government, whether at the highest or at the lowest level. This is clear to me in your sight, and let it grow ever clearer and clearer, I pray you, and in that manifestation let me persist soberly under your wings.
1:698
Item dixisti mihi uoce forti in aurem interiorem, quod nec illa creatura tibi coaeterna est, cuius uoluptas tu solus es teque perseuerantissima castitate hauriens mutabilitatem suam nusquam et numquam exerit et te sibi semper praesente, ad quem toto affectu se tenet, non habens futurum quod expectet nec in praeteritum traiciens quod meminerit, nulla uice uariatur nec in tempora ulla distenditur. o beata, si qua ista est, inhaerendo beatitudini tuae, beata sempiterno inhabitatore te atque inlnstratore suo!
照樣,你已用大聲在我的內耳對我說,連那受造之物也不與你同永,惟你是它的喜樂;它以最堅定的純潔暢飲於你,在何處、何時都不顯露自己的可變性;你既常臨在於它,它以全部的情感緊靠你,沒有它所等待的將來,也不把它所記得的拋入過去,因此它不被任何更迭所變動,也不被拉長進任何時間之中。哦有福的受造之物,若有這樣的存在,乃因緊靠你的福樂而有福——在你裏面有福,你是它永遠的居住者與照明者!
Likewise you have said to me with a strong voice in my inner ear, that not even that creature is coeternal with you, whose delight you alone are, and which, drinking in you with most persevering chastity, nowhere and never puts forth its own mutability; and with you ever present to it, to whom it holds fast with its whole affection, having no future that it awaits nor casting into the past anything it remembers, it is varied by no succession nor stretched out into any times. O blessed creature, if such there be, by cleaving to your blessedness—blessed in you, its everlasting indweller and illuminator!
1:699
nec inuenio, quid libentius appellandum existimem caelum caeli domino quapi domum tuam contemplantem delectationem tuam sine ullo defectu egrediendi in aliud, mentem puram concordissime unam stabilimento pacis sanctorum spirituum, ciuium ciuitatis tuae in caelestibus super ista caelestia. Vnde intellegat anima, cuius peregrinatio longinqua facta est, si iam sitit tibi, si iam factae sunt ei lacrimae suae panis, dum dicitur ei per singulos dies: ubi est deus tuus? si iam petit a te unam et hanc requirit, u t inhabitet in domo tua per omnes dies uitae suae? et quae uita eius nisi tu? et qui dies tui nisi aeternitas tua, sicut anni tui, qui non deficiunt, quia idem ipse es?
我也找不到還有甚麼比你的居所更樂意稱為那屬乎主、天上的天的——那居所默觀你的喜悅,毫無向別物外出的虧損,乃是純潔的心思,最和諧地合而為一,立於眾聖靈的平安之基上,這些聖靈是你城的居民,在這諸天之上的諸天裏。願那靈魂明白——就是那流落遠方、客旅生涯的靈魂——它如今是否渴慕你,它的眼淚是否已成了它的飲食,而人天天對它說:你的神在哪裏?它如今是否向你求一件事、單尋求這事,就是一生一世住在你的殿中?它的生命若非你,又是甚麼?你的日子若非你的永恆,又是甚麼,正如你那不衰殘的年數,因為你乃是那同一者?
Nor do I find what I should more gladly call the heaven of heaven belonging to the Lord than your house, contemplating your delight without any defect of going out into another thing, a pure mind, most harmoniously one, in the establishment of the peace of the holy spirits, citizens of your city in the heavens above these heavens. Whence let the soul understand—the soul whose pilgrimage has become far off—whether it now thirsts for you, whether its tears have now become its bread, while it is said to it day by day: Where is your God? Whether it now asks one thing of you and seeks this, that it may dwell in your house all the days of its life? And what is its life but you? And what are your days but your eternity, like your years which do not fail, because you are the selfsame?
1:700
hinc ergo intellegat anima, quae potest, quam longe super omnia tempora sis aeternus, quando tua domus, quae peregrinata non est, quamuis non sit tibi coaeterna, tamen indesinenter et indeficienter tibi cohaerendo nullam patitur uicissitudinem temporum. hoc in conspectu tuo claret mihi et magis magisque clarescat, oro te, atque in hac manifestatione persistam sobrius sub alis tuis.
因此,那能明白的靈魂便當明白,你是何等遠超一切時間之上而為永恆,既然你那未曾離家作客旅的居所,雖不與你同永,卻藉著不住、不衰地緊靠你,毫不遭受時間的更迭。這在你眼前向我顯明,求你叫它越發明亮、越發清晰,並在這顯明中讓我清醒地存留在你的翅膀蔭下。
Hence, then, let the soul that can, understand how far above all times you are eternal, since your house, which has not gone on pilgrimage, although it is not coeternal with you, yet by cleaving to you unceasingly and unfailingly suffers no succession of times. This is clear to me in your sight, and let it grow ever clearer and clearer, I pray you, and in this manifestation let me persist soberly under your wings.
1:701
Ecce nescio quid informe in istis mutationibus rerum extremarum atque infirmarum, et quis dicet mihi, nisi quisquis per inania cordis sui cum suis phantasmatis uagatur et uoluitur, quis nisi talis dicet mihi, quod deminuta atque consumpta omni specie, si sola remaneat informitas, per quam de specie in speciem res mutabatur et uertebatur, possit exhibere uices temporum? omnino enim non potest, quia sine uarietate motionum non sunt tempora: et nulla uarietas, ubi nulla species. Quibus consideratis, deus meus, quantum donas, quantum me ad pulsandum excitas quantumque pulsanti aperis, duo reperio, quae fecisti carentia temporibus, cum tibi neutrum coaeternum sit:
看哪,在這些最低、最微弱之物的變化中,有某種無形之物;誰能告訴我——除非是那藉著自己心中的虛空、帶著自己的幻象而遊蕩翻滾的人——除這樣的人以外,誰能告訴我:當一切形體都被削減、消耗,若惟有無形性存留,就是那叫一物從一個形體變換轉移到另一個形體的無形性,它便能呈現時間的更替?它根本不能,因為沒有運動的變化就沒有時間;哪裏沒有形體,哪裏就沒有變化。我的神啊,思想了這些事,按你所賜的、按你激動我叩門、又在我叩門時為我開啟的程度,我找到了兩樣你所造、缺乏時間之物,雖然這兩者都不與你同永:
Behold, there is something formless in these changes of the lowest and weakest things; and who shall tell me—unless it be whoever wanders and tumbles about through the empty places of his own heart with his own phantasms—who but such a one shall tell me that, when all form has been diminished and consumed, if formlessness alone should remain, through which a thing was changed and turned from form to form, it could then present the alternations of times? It cannot at all, because without the variety of motions there are no times; and there is no variety where there is no form. When these things have been considered, my God, as far as you grant, as far as you stir me to knock and open to me when I knock, I find two things which you made lacking in times, although neither of them is coeternal with you:
1:702
unum, quod ita formatum est, ut sine ullo defectu contemplationis, sine ullo interuallo mutationis, quamuis mutabile, tamen non mutatum aeternitate atque inconmutabilitate perfruatur; alterum, quod ita informe erat, ut ex qua forma in quam formam uel motionis uel stationis mutaretur, quo tempori subderetur, non haberet. sed hoc ut informe esset, non reliquisti, quoniam fecisti ante omnem diem in principio caelum et terram, haec duo quae dicebam. terra autem inuisibilis erat et inconposita et tenebrae super abyssum.
其一是這樣被賦予形體的:雖然可變,卻不被改變,毫無默觀的虧損,毫無變化的間隙,得以完全享受永恆與不變性;其二是這樣無形的:它沒有任何可使它從一個形體變換到另一個形體之物,無論是運動或靜止,因此也無從受時間的約束。但你並未任它保持無形,因為你在任何日子以先,在起初造了天地——就是我所說的這兩樣。但那地是不可見、未成形的,並有黑暗籠罩深淵。
the one which is so formed that, without any defect of contemplation, without any interval of change, although mutable, yet not changed, it fully enjoys eternity and unchangeableness; the other which was so formless that it had nothing by which it might be changed from one form into another form, whether of motion or of rest, by which it might be subjected to time. But this you did not leave to be formless, since before any day, in the beginning, you made heaven and earth—these two things of which I was speaking. But the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss.
1:703
quibus uerbis insinuatur informitas, ut gradatim excipiantur, qui omnimodam speciei priuationem nec tamen ad nihil peruentionem cogitare non possent, unde fieret alterum caelum et terra uisibilis atque conposita et aqua speciosa et quidquid deinceps in constitutione huius mundi non sine diebus factum conmemoratur, quia talia sunt, ut in eis agantur uicissitudines temporum propter ordinatas conmutationes motionum atque formarum. Hoc interim sentio, deus meus, cum audio loquentem scripturam tuam: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram:
藉著這些話,無形性得以傳達,好叫那些不能構想形體之全然剝奪、而又不至於歸於虛無的人,可以循序漸進地被引導——從這無形之中,可以產生另一個天,並可見而有秩序的地,並美麗的水,以及凡此後在這世界的構造中所記載、並非沒有日子而造成之物;因為這類之物的性質乃是:在其中發生時間的更替,這是緣於運動與形體的有序變化。我的神啊,當我聽你的經文說「起初神造天地」時,我暫且如此領會;
By which words formlessness is conveyed, so that they might be led on step by step who cannot conceive of an utter privation of form which yet does not arrive at nothing—out of which there might come to be another heaven, and a visible and ordered earth, and beautiful water, and whatever is afterward recorded as made not without days in the constitution of this world; for such things are of a kind that in them the vicissitudes of times take place, on account of the ordered changes of motions and forms. This for the present I perceive, my God, when I hear your Scripture speaking: In the beginning God made heaven and earth;
1:704
terra autem erat inuisibilis et inconposita et tenebrae erant super abyssum, neque conmemorantem, quoto die feceris haec, sic interim sentio propter illud caelum caeli, caelum intellectuale, ubi est intellectus nosse simul, non ex parte, non in aenigmate, non per speculum, sed ex toto, in manifestatione, facie ad faciem; non modo hoc, modo illud, sed, quod dictum est, nosse simul sine ulla uicissitudine temporum, et propter inuisibilem atque inconpositam terram sine ulla uicissitudine temporum, quae solet habere modo hoc et modo illud, quia ubi nulla species, nusquam est hoc et illud:
但地是不可見、未成形的,並有黑暗籠罩深淵——經文也沒有記述你在哪一日造了這些;於是我暫且如此領會,是緣於那天上的天,那屬悟性的天,在那裏悟性是同時認識一切,不是片片段段,不是藉著謎,不是藉著鏡子,乃是整全地,在顯明中,面對面;不是時而這、時而那,乃是如所說的,同時認識一切,毫無時間的更替;又是緣於那不可見、未成形的地,毫無時間的更替——這地素常是時而這、時而那,因為哪裏沒有形體,哪裏就沒有這與那:
but the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss—nor does it recall on what day you made these things; thus for the present I perceive, on account of that heaven of heaven, the intellectual heaven, where it belongs to the intellect to know all at once, not in part, not in an enigma, not through a mirror, but as a whole, in manifestation, face to face; not now this, now that, but, as has been said, to know all at once without any vicissitude of times; and on account of the invisible and unformed earth, without any vicissitude of times, which is wont to have now this and now that, because where there is no form, there is nowhere this and that:
1:705
propter duo haec, primitus formatum et penitus informe, illud caelum, sed caelum caeli, hoc uero terram, sed terram inuisibilem et inconpositam, propter duo haec interim sentio sine commemoratione dierum dicere scripturam tuam: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram. statim quippe subiecit, quam terram dixerit. et quod secundo die commemoratur factum firmamentum et uocatum, caelum insinuat, de quo caelo prius sine diebus sermo locutus sit. Mira profunditas eloquiorum tuorum, quorum ecce ante nos superficies blandiens paruulis: sed mira profunditas, deus meus, mira profunditas! horror est intendere in eam, horror honoris et tremor amoris. odi hostes eius uehementer:
緣於這兩樣,一樣是最先成形的,另一樣是徹底無形的——一樣是天,卻是天上的天,另一樣是地,卻是不可見、未成形的地——緣於這兩樣,我暫且領會你的經文如此說,並不提及日子:起初神造天地。因為它立即就加上所指的是哪種地。又因第二日記載穹蒼被造、並被稱為天,它便表明先前所論、未提日子的話所指的是哪種天。哦你言語何等奇妙的深邃,看哪,它的表面擺在我們面前,吸引著小子;但何等奇妙的深邃,我的神啊,何等奇妙的深邃!注視它令人戰兢——尊崇的戰兢與愛的震顫。我極其恨惡它的仇敵:
on account of these two things, the one first formed and the other utterly formless—the one heaven, but heaven of heaven, the other earth, but earth invisible and unformed—on account of these two things I perceive for the present that your Scripture says, without any mention of days: In the beginning God made heaven and earth. For at once it added what earth it meant. And because on the second day the firmament is recorded as made and called heaven, it conveys of what heaven the discourse had earlier spoken without days. O wondrous depth of your sayings, whose surface, behold, lies before us, alluring to little ones: but wondrous depth, my God, wondrous depth! It is dread to gaze into it—the dread of honor and the trembling of love. I hate its enemies vehemently:
← 上一段下一段 →
第 2 章 →
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。