📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 書信與論戰集(CSEL)

書信與論戰集(CSEL) 第 45 章 第 1/6 段

拉丁文原文.38 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 45:1–45:38(全章共 197 節)

← 第 44 章第 46 章 →
下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
45:1
LIBER PRIMUS. Ordinem rerum, Zenobi, cum sequi ac tenere cuique proprium tum uero uniuersitatis, quo cohercetur hic mundus et regitur, uel uidere uel pandere difficillimum hominibus atque rarissimum est. hue accedit, quod, etiamsi quis haec possit, non illud quoque ualet efficere, ut dignum auditorem tam diuinis obscurisque rebus uel uitae merito uel habitu quodam eruditionis inueniat. nec tamen quicquam est.
第一卷。芝諾比烏斯啊,要遵循並持守萬物的秩序——這秩序既屬於各人自己,尤其屬於那統攝並治理這世界的普世秩序——無論是要看見它,還是要闡明它,對人而言都是極其困難、極其罕見的事。此外還有:即使有人能做到這一點,他也未必能同時做到——為著如此神聖而幽隱的事,憑其生命的美德或某種學識的素養,尋得一位配得的聽者。然而,
BOOK ONE. To follow and to hold the order of things, Zenobius — an order proper both to each individual and indeed to that universal order by which this world is held together and governed — either to see it or to disclose it is a most difficult and most rare thing for men. To this is added that, even if anyone should be able to do this, he is not likewise able to bring it about that he should find a worthy hearer for matters so divine and obscure, either by the merit of his life or by a certain habit of learning. And yet there is nothing
45:2
quod magis auide expetant quaeque optima ingenia magisque audire ac discere studeant, qui scopulos uitae huius et procellas uelut erecto, quantum licet, capite inspiciunt, quam quomodo fiat, ut ei deus humana curet et tanta in humanis rebus peruersitas usque quaque diffusa sit, ut non diuinae sed ne seruili quidem cui procurationi, si ei tanta potestas daretur, tribuenda esse uideatur. quam ob rem illud quasi necessarium his, quibus talia c-urae sunt, credendum dimittitur, aut diuinam prouidentiam non usque in haec ultima et ima pertendi aut certe mala omnia dei uoluntate committi, utrumque impium, sed magis posterius.
沒有什麼是一切最優秀的心智更熱切渴求、更急於聽聞學習的了——就是那些盡可能昂首直視這人生之危岩與風暴的人所渴求的——即:神既眷顧人間諸事,何以如此巨大的乖謬又處處瀰漫於人事之中,以致這乖謬看來不當歸於神聖的治理,甚至若把如此大的權柄交給任何卑微的管理者,也不當歸於他。因此,對那些以此為念的人,剩下的、彷彿必然要相信的,便是二者之一:或是神聖的護理並不延及這些至末至低之事,或是一切的惡皆由神的旨意所成——二者皆為不虔,而後者尤甚。
which all the best minds more eagerly seek after, and are more zealous to hear and to learn — those who, with head as it were erect (so far as is allowed), look upon the crags and storms of this life — than how it comes to pass that God cares for human affairs, and yet so great a perversity is everywhere diffused throughout human matters, that it seems to be attributable not to a divine, nor even to any servile administration, if such great power were given to it. Wherefore this is left, as though necessary, to be believed by those to whom such things are a care: either that divine providence does not extend even to these last and lowest things, or certainly that all evils are committed by the will of God — both impious, but the latter more so.
45:3
quamquam enim desertum deo quicquam credere cum imperitissimum tum etiam periculosissimum animo sit, tamen in ipsis hominibus nemo quemquam non potuisse aliquid criminatus est. neglegentiae uero uituperatio multo est quam malitiae crudelitatisque purgatior. itaque uelut conpellitur ratio tenere non inmemor pietatis aut ista terrena non posse a diuinis amministrari aut neglegi atque contemni potius quam ita gubernari, ut omnis de deo sit mitis atque inculpanda conquestio. Sed quis tam caecus est mente, ut quicquam in mouendis corporibus rationis quod praeter humanam dispositionem ac uoluntatem est, diuinae potentiae moderationique dare dubitet ?
因為雖然相信有任何事物被神所撇棄,既是最無知,也是對靈魂最危險的;然而在人自己中間,卻沒有人指控過任何人「無能做某事」。而疏忽的責備,遠比惡意與殘忍的責備更容易得赦。因此理性彷彿被迫——並非不顧虔敬——去持守其一:或是這些屬地之事不能被屬神之事所管理,或是它們寧可被忽略輕視,也不是被如此治理,以致一切對神的抱怨都成了溫和而該受責的。但誰的心智竟如此盲目,以致在物體的運動中,凡超乎人的安排與意志之事,他也遲疑不肯歸於神的能力與治理呢?
For although to believe anything to be deserted by God is both most ignorant and also most dangerous to the soul, yet among men themselves no one has accused anyone of having been unable to do something. But the reproach of negligence is far more pardonable than that of malice and cruelty. And so reason is, as it were, compelled — not unmindful of piety — to hold either that these earthly things cannot be administered by divine things, or that they are rather neglected and despised than so governed that every complaint about God should be mild and blameworthy. But who is so blind in mind that he would hesitate to attribute to divine power and governance whatever, in the movements of bodies, is beyond human arrangement and will?
45:4
nisi forte aut casibus tam rata subtilique dimensione uel minutissimorum quorumque animalium membra figurantur aut, quod casu quis negat, possit nisi ratione factum fateri aut uero per uniuersam naturam, quod in singulis quibusque rebus nihil arte humana satagente ordinatum miramur, alienare a secretissimo maiestatis arbitrio ullis nugis uanae opinionis audebimus. at enim hoc ipsum est plenius quaestionum, quod membra pulicis disposita mire atque distincte sunt, cum interea humana uita innumerabilium perturbationum inconstantia uersetur et fluctuet.
除非或許——連最微小動物的肢體,也是憑機遇以如此精確而精微的比例被塑成的;然而人所否認為機遇者,就不得不承認乃是憑理性所造成的;又或者,在整個大自然中,凡我們驚歎其在各樣個別事物上被安排得井然、卻無任何人工在其間忙碌者,我們竟敢憑某些虛妄之見的無稽之談,把它從那至隱之尊嚴的判斷中剝離出去。然而正是這一點含有更多的疑問:跳蚤的肢體被奇妙而分明地安排著,與此同時,人的生命卻在無數紛擾的無常中被拋擲、動盪不定。
unless perhaps either the limbs of even the tiniest of animals are fashioned by chance with so fixed and subtle a proportion — but what one denies to be by chance, he cannot but confess to have been made by reason; or else, throughout universal nature, that which in each single thing we marvel to be ordered without any human art busying itself about it, we shall dare, by some trifles of vain opinion, to alienate from the most secret judgement of majesty. But indeed this very thing is more full of questions: that the limbs of a flea are arranged wonderfully and distinctly, while in the meantime human life is tossed and fluctuates in the inconstancy of innumerable disturbances.
45:5
sed hoc pacto, si quis tam minutum cerneret, ut in uermiculato pauimento nihil ultra unius tessellae modulum acies eius ualeret ambire, uituperaret artificem uelut ordinationis et compositionis ignarum eo, quod uarietatem lapillorum perturbatam putaret, a quo illa emblemata in unius pulchritudinis faciem congruentia simul cerni conlustrarique non possent. nihil enim aliud minus eruditis hominibus accidit, qui uniuersam rerum coaptationem atque conceptum inbecilla mente conplecti et considerare non ualentes, si quid eos offenderit, quia suae cogitationi magnum est, magnam rebus putant inhaerere foeditatem. Cuius erroris maxima causa est, quod homo sibi ipse est incognitus.
但事情是這樣的:假使有人如此細微地觀看,以致在鑲嵌地面上,他目光的視野所能環顧的,不過一塊嵌石的大小,他就會責備工匠,彷彿工匠不諳布置與構圖,因為他以為那些小石的多樣是雜亂無章的——其實正是這位工匠,使那些鑲嵌的圖案匯聚成單一之美的樣貌,只是不能一次盡覽而已。因為在較無學識的人身上,所發生的正是這樣的事:他們以孱弱的心思,無法把握並思量萬物整全的協調與構思,一旦有什麼冒犯了他們,就因這事在他們自己的思想中顯為大,便以為萬物本身附著著極大的醜惡。而這錯誤最大的緣由,就在於人對自己是茫然無知的。
But in this manner: if anyone should discern things so minutely that in a mosaic pavement the edge of his sight could compass nothing beyond the size of a single tessera, he would blame the craftsman as though ignorant of ordering and composition, because he thought the variety of the little stones confused — the craftsman by whom those inlaid figures, converging into the appearance of a single beauty, could not be beheld and surveyed all at once. For nothing else happens to less-educated men, who, being unable with a feeble mind to grasp and consider the entire fitting-together and design of things, if anything offend them, think — because it is great to their own thought — that a great foulness inheres in things. Of which error the greatest cause is that man is unknown to himself.
45:6
qui tamen ut se noscat, magna opus habet consuetudine recedendi a sensibus et animum in se ipsum colligendi atque in se ipso retinendi. quod hi tantum adsecuntur, qui plagas quasdam opinionum, quas uitae cotidianae cursus infligit, aut solitudine inurunt aut liberalibus medicant disciplinis. Ita enim sibi animus redditus, quae sit pulchritudo uniuersitatis, intellegit, quae profecto ab uno cognominata est idcircoque illam uidere non licet animae, quae in multa procedit sectaturque auiditate pauperiem, quam nescit sola segregatione multitudinis posse uitari. multitudinem autem non hominum dico sed omnium, quae sensus attingit.
然而,為要認識自己,人極需養成一種習慣:脫離感官,把心思收攏於自身,並持守於自身之內。惟有那些人才達到這境地:他們把日常生活歷程所加給人的、某些意見的創傷,或藉獨處來烙癒,或藉自由學科來醫治。因為心思如此歸回自身,就明白宇宙(universitas)之美為何——這美其實是從「一」(unum)得名的;因此那走入紛繁、在貪求中追逐貧乏的靈魂,是不得見這美的;那貧乏,靈魂不知惟有藉著與群多分離才能避免。而我所說的「群多」,並非指人,乃指凡感官所觸及的一切。
Yet, in order to know himself, he has need of a great habit of withdrawing from the senses, and of gathering the mind into itself and retaining it within itself. This only those attain who cauterize certain blows of opinions, which the course of daily life inflicts, either by solitude or heal them by the liberal disciplines. For thus the mind, restored to itself, understands what is the beauty of the universe — which indeed is named from the One (unum), and therefore it is not permitted to be seen by the soul that goes forth into multiplicity and pursues, in its greed, a poverty which it knows not can be avoided only by separation from the multitude. But by multitude I speak not of men, but of all things that the senses reach.
45:7
nec mirere, quod eo egestatem patitur magis, quo magis appetit plura conplecti. ut enim in circulo quantumuis amplo unum est medium, quo cuncta conuergunt, quod xsvvoov geometrae uocant, et quamuis totius ambitus partes innumerabiliter secari queant, nihil tamen est praeter illud unum, quo cetera pariliter dimetiantur et quod omnibus quasi quodam aequalitatis iure dominetur, hinc uero in quamlibet partem si egredi uelis, eo amittuntur omnia, quo in plurima pergitur, sic animus a se ipse fusus inmensitate quadam diuerberatur et uera mendicitate conteritur, cum eum natura sua cogit ubique unum quaerere et multitudo inuenire non sinit.
你也不必詫異:靈魂越想要擁抱更多事物,就越發匱乏。因為正如在一個圓中——無論何等廣大——有一個中心,萬物向它匯聚,幾何學家稱之為「圓心」(kentron);雖然整個圓周的各部分可被無限地分割,然而除了那一個中心之外,別無他物可據以平均量度其餘一切,並彷彿以某種均等之權轄管萬物;然而從這中心,你若想向任何一方走出去,越是走入群多,就越是喪失一切——照樣,心思一旦從自身傾流而出,就被某種無際所擊打,被真正的乞丐般貧困所磨損,因為它自己的本性逼它處處尋求那「一」,群多卻不容它尋見。
Nor should you marvel that it suffers want the more, the more it desires to embrace more things. For as in a circle, however vast, there is one centre to which all things converge — which the geometers call the 'kentron' — and although the parts of the whole circumference can be divided innumerably, yet there is nothing except that one, by which the rest are equally measured, and which dominates them all as it were by a certain right of equality; but from here, if you should wish to go out into any part whatever, all things are lost the further one proceeds into the many — so the mind, poured out from itself, is battered by a certain immensity and is worn away by true beggary, when its own nature compels it to seek the One everywhere, and multitude does not permit it to find it.
45:8
Sed et haec, quae dixi, qualia sint et quae causa extet erroris animarum quoque modo et in unum congruant atque perfecta sint cuncta et tamen peccata fugienda sint, assequeris profecto, mi Zenobi — sic enim mihi notum est ingenium tuum et pulchritudinis omnimodae amator animus sine libidinis inmoderatione atque sordibus, quod signum in te futurae sapientiae perniciosis cupiditatibus diuino iure praescribit, ne tuam causam deseras falsis uoluptatibus inlectus, qua praeuaricatione nihil turpius et periculosius inueniri potest — assequeris ergo ista, mihi crede, cum eruditioni operam dederis, qua purgatur et excolitur animus nullo modo ante idoneus, cui diuina semina committantur.
但即使我所說的這些事——它們是何等性質,靈魂錯謬的緣由為何,萬物又如何既彼此協調歸一、且全然完美,然而罪仍當躲避——我的芝諾比烏斯啊,你必定能領會;因為我如此認識你的品性:你是一個愛慕各樣美善的靈魂,沒有情慾的無度、沒有污穢——這在你身上乃是一個記號,神聖的權柄藉此為那將來的智慧立下規範,抵擋敗壞人的私慾,免得你被虛假的歡樂所誘,撇棄自己的本分;再沒有比這種背棄更卑鄙、更危險的了。所以請信我:當你致力於那學問——藉它,那先前絕不配領受神聖種子的心思,得以被潔淨、被陶養——你就必領會這些事。
But even these things which I have said — of what kind they are, and what cause there is for the error of souls, and in what manner all things both harmonize into one and are perfect, and yet sins are to be shunned — you will surely attain, my Zenobius; for so is your character known to me, a soul that loves beauty of every kind without immoderation of lust and without filth — which is a sign in you that divine right prescribes a future wisdom against pernicious desires, lest, allured by false pleasures, you desert your own cause, than which transgression nothing more base and more dangerous can be found. You will attain these things, then, believe me, when you have devoted your effort to that learning by which the mind is purged and cultivated, being in no way fit beforehand to have divine seeds committed to it.
45:9
quod totum cuius modi sit et quem flagitet ordinem quidue studiosis et bonis ratio promittat qualemque uitam nos uiuamus, carissimi tui, et quem fructum de liberali otio carpamus, hi te libri satis, ut opinor, edocebunt nomine tuo nobis quam nostra elaboratione dulciores, praesertim si te in ipsum ordinem, de quo ad te scribo, meliora eligens inserere atque coaptare uolueris. Nam cum stomachi dolor scholam me deserere coegisset, qui iam, ut scis, etiam sine ulla tali necessitate in philosophiam confugere moliebar, statim me contuli ad uillam familiarissimi nostri Uerecundi. quid dicam eo libente? nosti optime hominis cum in omnes tum uero in nos beniuolentiam singularem.
這一切究竟是關乎什麼,它要求何等秩序,理性向勤學向善之人所應許的是什麼,我們——你所親愛的人——過的是何等生活,我們從自由的閒暇中採得何等果實:我想,這幾卷書必充分教導你;它們對我們而言,因你的名之故,比因我們自己的著述之故更為甘美,尤其若你擇取更美之事,願意把自己編入、契合於我所寫給你的這同一秩序之中。因為當胃痛逼我不得不放棄講席時——你知道,我即使沒有這樣的必要,早已在籌謀逃向哲學了——我隨即前往我們至交維雷昆都斯的鄉間別墅。他既如此樂意,我還能說什麼呢?你極熟知這人非凡的善意,無論對眾人、尤其對我們。
What that whole matter is of, and what order it demands, and what reason promises to the studious and the good, and what kind of life we lead — we, your dear ones — and what fruit we gather from our liberal leisure: these books will sufficiently teach you, as I think, being sweeter to us for your name's sake than for our own elaboration, especially if, choosing better things, you should wish to insert and fit yourself into that very order concerning which I write to you. For when a pain of the stomach had compelled me to abandon the school — I who already, as you know, even without any such necessity was contriving to take refuge in philosophy — at once I betook myself to the country house of our most intimate friend Verecundus. What shall I say, he being so willing? You know very well the man's singular benevolence, both toward all and indeed toward us.
45:10
ibi disserebamus inter nos, quaecumque uidebantur utilia adhibito sane stilo, quo cuncta exciperentur, quod uidebam conducere ualetudini meae. cum enim nonnulla loquendi cura detinerer, nulla inter disputandum inrepebat immoderata contentio; simul etiam, ut, si quid nostrum litteris mandare placuisset, nec aliter dicendi necessitas nec labor recordationis esset. agebant autem ista mecum Alypius et Nauigius, frater meus, et Licentius repente admirabiliter poeticae deditus; Trygetium item nobis militia reddiderat, qui tamquam ueteranus adamauit historiam; etiam in libris nonnihil habebamus.
我們在那裡彼此討論凡看來有益的一切,並且妥當地動用了筆,好把一切記錄下來——這事我看出有益於我的健康。因為既有幾分講說的謹慎約束著我,在辯論之間就沒有無度的爭競潛入;同時也是為著:我們若樂意把自己的什麼付諸文字,就既不必另用他法陳說,也免去追憶的勞苦。與我一同進行這些的,有阿呂皮烏斯、我的弟兄納維吉烏斯、以及利肯提烏斯——他忽然奇妙地醉心於詩;軍旅生涯也把特呂革提烏斯還給了我們,他彷彿一名老兵,愛上了歷史;此外我們在書卷方面也略有所備。
There we discussed among ourselves whatever seemed useful, with the pen duly employed, by which all things might be taken down — a thing which I saw to be conducive to my health. For since I was detained by some care of speaking, no immoderate contention crept in during our disputation; and at the same time, so that, if it pleased us to commit anything of ours to writing, there might be neither the necessity of speaking otherwise nor the labour of recollection. These things carried on with me Alypius, and Navigius my brother, and Licentius, suddenly and admirably devoted to poetry; Trygetius likewise had military service restored to us, who, as though a veteran, fell in love with history; also we had something in books.
45:11
Sed nocte quadam, cum euigilassem de more mecumque ipse tacitus agitarem, quae in mentem nescio unde ueniebant — nam id mihi amore inueniendi ueri iam in consuetudinem uerterat, ut aut primam, si tales curae inerant, aut certe ultimam, dimidiam tamen fere noctis partem peruigil quodcumque cogitarem, nec me patiebar adulescentium lucubrationibus a mo ipso auocari, quia et illi per totum diem tantum agebant, ut nimium mihi uideretur, si aliquid etiam noctium in studiorum laborem usurparent, et id a me ipsi quoque praeceptum habebant, ut aliquid et praeter codices secum agerent et sese habitare consuefacerent animum — ergo, ut dixi, uigilabam, cum ecce aquae sonus pone balneas, quae praeterfha-bilt, eduxit me in aures et animaduersus est solito adtentius.
但在某一夜,我照著習慣醒來,默然在心中翻想那些不知從何而來、湧入我心的事——因為出於愛慕尋求真理,這對我早已成了習慣:若有這類思慮,我便在夜的前半、或至少在後半、然而幾乎是半夜的時間裡儆醒不寐,思索我所能想的一切;我也不容自己被少年人的挑燈夜讀從自身喚離,因為他們整日已經做得如此之多,以致我覺得,他們若再侵佔任何夜晚用於學業之勞,就太過了;而且他們也從我領有這樣的訓誨:要在書卷之外也進行些什麼,使心思習慣於與自身同居——所以,如我所說,我正醒著,忽然,浴室後面它所流經之處的水聲,把我引入耳中,並被我比平常更專注地留意到。
But on a certain night, when I had awakened after my custom and was turning over silently within myself the things which came into my mind from I know not where — for this had already become a habit for me, from love of finding the truth, that either the first part of the night (if such cares were present) or at least the last, yet nearly the half of the night, I should keep vigil pondering whatever I might, nor would I suffer myself to be called away from myself by the young men's lucubrations, because they too were doing so much throughout the whole day that it seemed too much to me if they should also usurp any of the night for the labour of studies, and they had this too as a precept from me, that they should carry on something even apart from their books, and accustom the mind to dwell with itself — therefore, as I said, I was awake, when lo, the sound of water behind the baths, which it flowed past, drew me into my ears, and was noticed more attentively than usual.
45:12
mirum admodum mihi uidebatur, quod nunc clarius nunc pressius eadem aqua strepebat silicibus inruens. coepi a me quaerere, quaenam causa esset. fateor, nihil occurrebat, cum Licentius lecto suo inportunos percusso iuxta ligno sorices terruit seseque uigilantem hoc modo indicauit. cui ego: Animaduertis, inquam, Licenti — nam uideo tibi Musam tuam lumen ad lucubrandum accendisse — quomodo canalis iste inconstanter sonet ? — Iam, inquit, mihi hoc non est nouum. nam desiderio serenitatis cum expergefactus aliquando aurem admouissem, ne imber ingrueret, hoc agebat aqua ista, quod nunc. — Approbauit Trygetius.
我覺得極其奇怪:同一股水衝擊石頭時,時而較清晰、時而較低沉地作響。我開始自問其緣由何在。我承認,我一無所得,這時利肯提烏斯敲擊床邊的一塊木頭,驚走了惱人的老鼠,如此表明他正醒著。我對他說:「利肯提烏斯,你可留意到——因為我看見你的繆斯已為你點起夜讀的燈——這溝渠的聲響何等不定?」他說:「這對我早已不是新鮮事。因為出於渴望天晴,有一次我醒來,恐怕要下雨,便側耳去聽,那時這水所作的,正如現在一樣。」特呂革提烏斯也表示贊同。
It seemed exceedingly strange to me that the same water now more clearly, now more subduedly, made its noise as it rushed against the stones. I began to ask myself what the cause might be. I confess, nothing occurred to me, when Licentius, striking a piece of wood beside his bed, frightened away the troublesome mice, and thus indicated that he was awake. To whom I said: 'Do you notice, Licentius — for I see that your Muse has kindled a lamp for you to work by night — how inconstantly that channel sounds?' 'Already,' said he, 'this is nothing new to me. For out of desire for clear weather, when once, being awakened, I had put my ear to it, lest a shower should come on, this water was doing what it does now.' Trygetius approved.
45:13
nam et ipse in eodem conclaui lecto suo cubans uigilabat nobis nescientibus — erant enim tenebrae — quod in Italia etiam pecuniosis prope necesse est. Ergo ubi uidi scholam nostram, quantacumque aderat — nam et Alypius et Nauigius in urbem ierant — etiam illis horis non sopitam, et me cursus ille aquarum aliquid de se dicere admonebat: Quidnam nobis, inquam, uidetur esse causae, quod sic alternat hic sonus? non enim quemquam putamus his horis uel transitu uel re aliqua lauanda totiens illum meatum interpellare.
因為他也躺在同一室內的床上醒著,我們卻不知道——因為那時黑暗,這在意大利即使對富有之人也幾乎是必然的。因此,當我看見我們的講學班——無論在場的有多少(因為阿呂皮烏斯和納維吉烏斯都進城去了)——連在那樣的時辰也未曾沉睡,且那水流正提醒我就此說些什麼時,我便說:「我們看這聲響如此交替,緣由何在?因為我們不認為有誰在這樣的時辰,或藉走過、或藉洗滌什麼,如此頻繁地攔阻那水道。」
For he too, lying on his bed in the same chamber, was awake without our knowing it — for it was dark, which in Italy is almost a necessity even for the well-to-do. Therefore, when I saw that our school, however small it was present — for both Alypius and Navigius had gone into the city — was even at those hours not lulled to sleep, and that that course of the waters was admonishing me to say something about it: 'What,' said I, 'does there seem to us to be the cause, that this sound thus alternates? For we do not suppose that anyone at these hours, either by passing through or by some thing to be washed, so often interrupts that channel.'
45:14
— Quid putas, inquit Licentius, nisi alicubi folia cuiuscemodi, quae autumno perpetua copioseque decidunt, angustiis canalis intertrusa uinci aliquando atque cedere, ubi autem unda, quae urgebat, pertransierit, rursum colligi atque stipari aut aliquid aliud uario casu foliorum natantium fieri, quod ad illum fluxum nunc refrenandum nunc emittendum similiter ualeat? — Uisum est mihi probabile aliud non habenti confessusque sum laudans ingenium eius nihil me inuenisse, cum diu quaesissem, cur ita esset. Tum interposito modico silentio: Merito, inquam, tu nihil mirabaris et apud Calliopam te intus tenebas. — Merito, inquit ille, sed modo plane dedisti mihi magnum mirari. — Quidnam hoc est?
利肯提烏斯說:「你想是什麼呢?無非是某處有各樣的葉子——它們在秋天連綿而豐盛地落下——被塞進溝渠的窄處,有時被壓服而讓開;但當方才逼迫的水波通過之後,它們又重新聚攏堆積;或是漂浮的葉子藉各種偶然發生了別的什麼,同樣既能時而攔阻、時而放開那水流。」我既無別的說法,就覺得這說法看似有理,便承認並稱讚他的才智,說我雖久久尋思何以如此,卻一無所獲。隨後,稍作沉默之後,我說:「難怪你什麼也不驚奇,你正與卡利俄佩同居於內室。」他說:「不錯;但你方才分明給了我一件大可驚奇的事。」我說:「這是什麼呢?」
'What do you suppose,' said Licentius, 'except that somewhere leaves of some kind or other — which in autumn continually and copiously fall — thrust into the narrows of the channel are at times overcome and give way; but when the wave, which was pressing, has passed through, they are again collected and packed together; or that something else happens by the various chance of the floating leaves, which likewise avails now to check, now to release, that flow?' It seemed probable to me, having nothing else, and I confessed, praising his talent, that I had found nothing, though I had long sought why it should be so. Then, after a little silence interposed: 'Rightly,' said I, 'did you marvel at nothing, and kept yourself within, with Calliope.' 'Rightly,' said he, 'but just now you have plainly given me something great to marvel at.' 'What then is this?'
45:15
inquam. — Quod tu, inquit, ista miratus es. — Unde enim solet, inquam, oboriri admiratio aut quae huius uitii mater est nisi res insolita praeter manifestum causarum ordinem ? - Et ille: \'Praeter manifestum\' inquit, accipio; nam praeter ordinem nihil mihi fieri uidetur. — Hic ego erectior spe alacriore, quam soleo esse, cum aliquid ab his requiro, quod rem tantam et tam subito heri paene ad ista conuersus adulescentis animus concepisset nulla umquam de his rebus inter nos antea quaestione agitata: Bene, inquam, bene; sed prorsus bene multum sensisti, multum ausus es. hoc, mihi crede, longo interuallo transcendit Heliconem, ad cuius uerticem tamquam ad caelum peruenire conaris.
他說:「就是你竟驚奇這些事。」我說:「驚奇通常從何而生?這毛病的根源又是什麼——豈不是超乎諸因明顯次序之外的不尋常之事嗎?」他說:「『超乎明顯的』,這我接受;因為在我看來,沒有什麼是超乎次序而發生的。」這時我心中比平日向這些少年探問時更為挺身、懷著更活潑的盼望——因為這少年的心竟如此突然地(他昨天幾乎才轉向這類事物)領會了這樣一件大事,而我們先前從未在彼此間激起過關於這些事的任何問題——我便說:「好,好;但你所領會的甚多、且全然美善,你所膽敢的也甚多。信我,這遠遠超越了赫利孔山,你正竭力攀登其巔,彷彿要登上天庭。」
'That you,' said he, 'marvelled at these things.' 'Whence,' said I, 'is wonder wont to arise, or what is the mother of this fault, except an unusual thing beyond the manifest order of causes?' And he: '"Beyond the manifest" I accept,' said he; 'for nothing seems to me to happen beyond order.' Here I, more erect with a livelier hope than I am wont to have when I inquire something of these young men — because so great a matter, and so suddenly (having yesterday almost turned to such things), the young man's mind had conceived, though no question about these matters had ever before been stirred among us — 'Well,' said I, 'well; but you have felt much, and altogether well, and much you have dared. This, believe me, transcends by a long interval Helicon, to whose summit you strive to arrive as though to heaven.'
45:16
sed peruellem adesses huic sententiae; nam eam labefactare temptabo. — Sine, inquit, modo me mihi, quaeso te; nam ualde in aliud intendi animum. — Hic ego nonnihil metuens, ne studio poeticae penitus prouolutus a philosophia longe raperetur: Inritor, inquam , abs te uersus istos tuos omni metrorum genere cantando et ululando insectari, qui inter te atque ueritatem inmaniorem murum quam inter amantes tuos conantur erigere; nam in se illi uel inolita rimula respirabant. Pyramum enim ille tum canere instituerat. Quod cum seueriore quam putabat uoce dixissem, subticuit aliquantum. et ego iam reliqueram coeptam et ad me redieram, ne frustra occupare praeoccupatum atque inepte uellem; tum ille:
「但我甚願你在場護持這見解,因為我要試著動搖它。」他說:「求你此刻讓我獨處吧;因為我已把心思強烈地轉向另一件事了。」這時我略有幾分懼怕,恐怕他被詩的熱忱徹底推捲而去,遠遠被擄離哲學,便說:「我被你惹得要用各樣格律歌唱、嚎叫來攻擊你那些詩句——那些詩句竭力在你與真理之間豎起一堵牆,比你那對戀人之間的牆更為可怕;因為他們那堵牆至少還藉一道天生的縫隙彼此通氣呢。」原來他那時已著手歌詠皮拉摩斯。我用比他所料更嚴厲的聲音說了這話,他就沉默了一會兒。而我也已放下我所開始的,歸回自身,免得徒然又不合宜地想去佔據一個已被別的事佔據的心。這時他說:
'But I could well wish you were present to this opinion, for I shall attempt to shake it.' 'Leave me,' said he, 'just now to myself, I beseech you; for I have strongly bent my mind to another thing.' Here I, fearing somewhat lest, utterly rolled forward by his zeal for poetry, he should be carried far away from philosophy: 'I am provoked,' said I, 'by you to harass those verses of yours by singing and howling them in every kind of metre — verses which attempt to raise between you and truth a wall more monstrous than that between your lovers; for they at least breathed through even an inborn little chink.' For he had then set himself to sing of Pyramus. And when I had said this with a voice sterner than he thought, he was silent for a while. And I had already left off what I had begun, and had returned to myself, lest in vain and ineptly I should wish to occupy one already preoccupied; then he:
45:17
Egomet meo indicio quasi sorex, inquit, non dictum est commodius apud Terentium quam nunc dici a me de me potest; sed sane illud ultimum fortasse in contrarium uertetur; quod enim ait ille: hodie perii, ego forte hodie inueniar. nam si non contemnitis, quod superstitiosi solent, etiam de muribus augurari, si ego illum murem uel soricem, qui me tibi uigilantem detulit, strepitu meo commonui, si quid sapit, redire in cubile suum secumque conquiescere, cur non ego ipse isto strepitu uocis tuae commonear philosophari potius quam cantare? nam illa est, ut tibi cotidie probanti iam coepi credere, uera et inconcussa nostra habitatio.
他說:「我自己,憑我自己的把柄,就像一隻鼩鼱——在泰倫提烏斯那裡說得也不比我如今論到自己所能說的更貼切;不過那最後一句或許要反轉過來。因為他所說的『我今天完了』,我或許今天倒要被尋見了。因為你若不像迷信之人所常為的那樣、鄙棄連從老鼠身上取兆頭:假使我用聲響警告那隻把我醒著洩露給你的老鼠或鼩鼱,叫牠(若牠有幾分知覺)回到自己的洞裡安靜歇息,那麼我自己為何不被你這聲音的響動所警戒,去愛智慧、而非去歌唱呢?因為那——正如我如今開始相信的,既然你天天證實它——才是我們真實而不可動搖的居所。」
'I myself, by my own token, like a shrew-mouse,' said he — 'it was not said more aptly in Terence than it can now be said by me of myself; but perhaps that last part will be turned to the contrary. For what he says: "Today I have perished," I perhaps today shall be found. For if you do not despise — as the superstitious are wont — even to take auguries from mice: if I warned that mouse or shrew, which betrayed me to you as being awake, by my noise, that (if it has any sense) it should return to its lair and rest quietly with itself, why should not I myself be warned by this noise of your voice to philosophize rather than to sing? For that is — as I have now begun to believe, since you daily prove it — our true and unshaken dwelling.'
45:18
quare, si tibi molestum non est atque id fieri debere arbitraris, roga quod uis; defendam, quantum possum, ordinem rerum nihilque praeter ordinem fieri posse asseram. tantum enim eum animo imbibi atque hausi, ut, etiamsi me quisquam in hac disputatione superarit, etiam hoc nulli temeritati sed rerum ordini tribuam. neque enim res ipsa, sed Licentius superabitur. Ego rursum gaudens eis me restitui. tum Trygetio: Quid, inquam, tibi uidetur? — Faueo quidem, inquit, ordini plurimum, sed incertus sum tamen et rem tantam diligentissime discuti cupio. - Fauorem, inquam, tuum illa ergo pars habeat; nam quod incertus es, etiam cum Licentio ac me ipso tibi puto esse commune.
「因此,你若不覺為難,並判斷這事該行,就隨你所願地問吧;我要盡我所能維護萬物的秩序,並要斷言沒有什麼能超乎秩序而發生。因為我已如此把它吸入、飲入心中,以致即使有人在這辯論中勝過我,我也要把這一點同樣不歸於任何魯莽,而歸於萬物的秩序。因為被勝過的,不是這事本身,乃是利肯提烏斯。」我歡喜地把自己重新交還他們。隨後我對特呂革提烏斯說:「你看如何?」他說:「我固然極其偏向秩序,然而我仍是遲疑不定,並渴望這樣一件大事被最殷勤地討論。」我說:「那麼,就讓那一方得你的偏袒吧;至於你的遲疑,我想你與利肯提烏斯、也與我自己是相同的。」
'Wherefore, if it is not troublesome to you, and you judge that it ought to be done, ask what you will; I shall defend, as much as I can, the order of things, and shall assert that nothing can happen beyond order. For I have so imbibed and drunk it into my mind that, even if anyone should overcome me in this disputation, I shall attribute even this not to any rashness but to the order of things. For it is not the matter itself, but Licentius, that will be overcome.' Rejoicing, I restored myself to them again. Then to Trygetius: 'What,' said I, 'seems to you?' 'I favour the order much indeed,' said he, 'but I am nevertheless uncertain, and I desire so great a matter to be most diligently discussed.' 'Let that party, then,' said I, 'have your favour; for as to your being uncertain, I think you have this in common with Licentius and with myself too.'
45:19
— Prorsus, ait Licentius, ego huius sententiae certus sum. quid enim dubitem parietem, cuius mentionem fecisti, antequam plane se erexit, diruere? non enim uere poetica tantum me auertere a pliilosophi;i potest, quantum inueniendi ueri diffidentia. — Tum Trygetius gaudentibus uerbis: Habemus, inquit, iam. quod plus est, Licentium non Academicum. eos enim ille studiosissime defendere solebat. — Haec modo, inquit, omitte quaeso, 110 mo hoc uafrum quiddam et captatorium a nescio qua diuina ro, quae mihi so ostentare coepit et cui mo inhiantem suspendo, detorqueat atque disrumpat.
利肯提烏斯說:「絕對地,我對這見解是確信的。因為你所提及的那堵牆,尚未分明豎起,我又何必遲疑去拆毀它?因為詩其實並不能像對尋得真理的疑懼那樣,把我從哲學那裡引開。」於是特呂革提烏斯以歡喜的話說:「我們如今更有一件事:得了一個不再是學園派的利肯提烏斯;因為他從前最熱切地為那些人辯護。」他說:「求你此刻撇下這些吧,免得這來自我不知何等神聖之事的、狡黠而誘人的什麼——它已開始向我顯露,我正張口渴慕著它——把我扭轉開去、將我折斷。」
'Absolutely,' said Licentius, 'I am certain of this opinion. For why should I hesitate to demolish the wall, of which you made mention, before it has plainly raised itself up? For poetry cannot truly turn me away from philosophy so much as distrust of finding the truth can.' Then Trygetius, with rejoicing words: 'We have now,' said he, 'what is more, a Licentius who is no Academic; for those he used most zealously to defend.' 'Omit these things now, I beseech you,' said he, 'lest this cunning and captious something from I know not what divine thing, which has begun to show itself to me, and toward which I hang gaping, should twist me aside and break me off.'
45:20
— Hic ego multo uberius cernens abundare laetitias meas, quam uel optare aliquando ausus sum, uersum Istum gestiens effudi: sic pater ille deus faciat ! perducet enim ipse, si sequimur, quo nos ire iubet atque ubi ponere sedem, qui dat modo ang-urium nostrisque inlabitur animis. nec enim altus Apollo est, qui in speluncis in montibus in nemoribus nidore turis pecudumque calamitate concitatus inplet insanos, sed alius profecto est, alius ille altus ueridicus atque ipsa — quid enim uerbis ambiam? — ueritas, cuius uates sunt, quicumque possunt esse sapirntl\'s. ergo adgrediemur, Licenti; freti pietate cultores uestigiis nostris ignem perniciosum fumosarum cupiditatum opprimamus.
這時我察覺自己的喜樂遠比我曾敢奢望的更豐盛地滿溢,就歡躍地吟出那句詩:「願那位父神成就此事!」因為若我們跟隨,祂自己必引領——引到祂所吩咐我們去的地方,並在何處安置我們的居所;祂如今賜下預兆,滑入我們的心靈。因為那充滿狂亂之人的,並非那高踞的阿波羅——在洞穴、在山嶺、在樹叢,被香煙與牲畜的宰殺所激動的那位;乃是另有其人,確乎是另有其人——那另一位崇高的、說真言的,就是真理本身(我又何必以言辭兜圈子呢?)——凡能有智慧的人,都是祂的先知。所以利肯提烏斯,讓我們前進吧;倚靠虔敬,作敬拜者,讓我們用腳步踏滅那煙氣騰騰之私慾的害人烈火。
Here I, perceiving my joys to abound far more richly than I ever once dared even to wish, exultingly poured forth that verse: 'So may that father God bring it to pass!' For He Himself will lead — if we follow — whither He bids us go, and where to set our seat, He who now gives augury and glides into our minds. For it is not the lofty Apollo who, in caves, on mountains, in groves, stirred up by the smoke of incense and the slaughter of cattle, fills the frenzied ones; but another, assuredly, is another — that other lofty and truth-speaking one, and truth itself (for why should I go about with words?) — whose seers are whoever can be wise. Therefore let us go forward, Licentius; relying on piety, as worshippers let us, with our footsteps, crush out the destructive fire of smoky lusts.
45:21
Iam, inquit, interroga, oro to, si possim hoc tantum nescio quid explicare et uerbis et meis. — Hoc ipsum, inquam, mihi responde, primo unde tibi uideatur aqua ista non temere sic sed ordine influere. nam quod ligneolis canalibus superlabitur et ducitur usque in usus nostros, potest ad ordinem pertinere. factum est enim ab hominibus ratione utentibus, ut uno eius itinere simul et biberent et lauarent, et pro locorum oportunitatibus consequens erat, ut ita fieret, quod uero illa, ut dicis, folia sic inciderunt, ut hoc, quod ammirati sumus, eueniret, quo tandem rerum ordine ac non casu potius factum putabimus?
他說:「如今,我求你,問吧——看我能否把這件我不知何等、如此巨大的事,既以言辭、又以我自己的話語展開。」我說:「你就先回答我這一點:你憑什麼認為這水不是隨意這樣、乃是有序地流動的。因為它滑過那些小木槽、被引導以至於我們的用途,這可以歸於秩序;因為這是運用理性的人所造成的:藉它同一條水路,好使他們既能飲用、又能洗滌,並且照著各處的便利,理當如此而行。但至於你所說那些葉子,它們如此落下、以致我們所驚歎的這事得以發生——請問,我們究竟要視之為出於萬物的什麼秩序,而不是寧可出於機遇呢?」
'Now,' said he, 'ask, I pray you, whether I can unfold this something, I know not what, so great, both in words and in my own words.' 'Answer me this very thing,' said I: 'first, whence it seems to you that this water flows not at random thus, but in order. For that it glides over the little wooden channels and is led as far as our uses may pertain to order; for it was done by men using reason, that by one course of it they might at once both drink and wash, and, according to the conveniences of the places, it was consequent that it should so be done. But as to those leaves which, as you say, so fell in that this thing which we marvelled at should come about — by what order of things, pray, and not rather by chance, shall we suppose it to have been done?'
45:22
- Quasi uero, inquit ille, aliter, atque ceciderunt, debuisse aut potuisse cadere cuiquam uideri potest serenissime intuenti nihil posse fieri sine causa. quid? iam uis persequar situs arborum atque ramorum Ipsumque pondus, quantum natura foliis imposuit? quid? aeris uel mobilitatem, qua uolitant, uel mollitiam, qua descendunt, uariosque lapsus pro affectione caeli pro onere pro figuris suis ceterisque innumerabilibus atque obscurioribus causis quid me attinet quaerere? latent ista sensus nostros, penitus latent; illud tamen, quod adgressae quaestioni satis est, nescio quo modo animum non latet, nihil fieri sine causa. potest enim odiosus percontator pergere quaerere:
他說:「彷彿——在一個最平靜地凝視、深知沒有什麼能無因而發生的人看來——那些葉子竟能顯得本該、或本可以,以有別於它們實際落下的方式落下似的。怎麼?你如今要我去追究樹木與枝條的位置、以及自然加在葉子上那分量之多寡嗎?怎麼?空氣的活動(葉子藉此飄舞)、或空氣的柔軟(葉子藉此下降)、以及照著天空的情狀、照著重量、照著它們的形狀、並其餘無數而更幽隱之因所產生的各樣墜落——這與我探究何干?這些事隱藏於我們的感官,深深隱藏;然而那對於所提之問足夠的一點,卻以我不知的某種方式,並不隱藏於心思:就是沒有什麼是無因而發生的。因為一個惹人厭的盤問者還能接著問:
'As though indeed,' said he, 'it could seem to anyone gazing most serenely — that nothing can happen without a cause — that they ought to have, or could have, fallen otherwise than they did fall. What? Do you now wish me to pursue the positions of the trees and the branches, and the very weight, as much as nature imposed upon the leaves? What? The mobility of the air, by which they flutter, or the softness, by which they descend, and the various fallings according to the disposition of the sky, according to the burden, according to their shapes, and the other innumerable and more obscure causes — what concern is it of mine to inquire? These things lie hidden from our senses, deeply hidden; yet that which is enough for the question undertaken does not, in some way I know not, lie hidden from the mind: that nothing happens without a cause. For an odious questioner can go on to ask:
45:23
quae causa erat, ut ibi arbores ponerentur? respondebo secutos esse homines uber terrae. quid, si fructuosae arbores non sunt ac temere natae sunt? et hic respondebo nos parum uidere; nam temerariam quae illas genuit nequaquam esse naturam. quid plura? aut aliquid sine causa fieri docear aut nihil fieri nisi certo causarum ordine credite. Cui ego: Licet, inquam, me odiosum percontatorem uoces — uix enim possum non esse, qui expugnaui, ne cum Pyramo et Thisbe conloquereris — pergam tamen quaerere abs te. natura ista, quam uis uideri ordinatam, cui bono - ut de ceteris rebus innumerabilibus taceam- istas ipsas arbores, quae fructus non afferunt, procreauit?
是什麼緣故使那些樹被栽在那裡?我要回答:人是隨從土壤的肥沃。若那些樹不結果,是隨意自生的呢?在此我也要回答:是我們看得太少;因為生出它們的自然絕非鹵莽。何必多說?要麼教導我有什麼是無因而發生的,要麼就相信除非按確定的諸因次序,沒有什麼會發生。」我對他說:「你儘管稱我為惹人厭的盤問者——我幾乎不能不是這樣的人,既已攻下那牆,好叫你不與皮拉摩斯和提斯柏交談——然而我仍要繼續向你探問。這你想使之顯為有序的自然,究竟為了誰的益處——姑且不論其餘無數之事——生出了這些不結果子的樹呢?」
what was the cause that trees should be placed there? I shall answer that men followed the richness of the soil. What, if the trees are not fruitful and have grown up at random? Here too I shall answer that we see too little; for the nature that begot them is by no means rash. Why say more? Either let me be taught that something happens without a cause, or believe that nothing happens except by a fixed order of causes.' To whom I: 'You may,' said I, 'call me an odious questioner — for I can scarcely not be one, having stormed the wall so that you might not converse with Pyramus and Thisbe — yet I shall go on to inquire of you. This nature, which you would have seem ordered, for whose good — to be silent about the other innumerable things — did it bring forth these very trees which bear no fruit?'
45:24
— At illo cogitante, quid diceret, ait Trygetius: Numquidnam usus arbustorum in solis fructibus praebetur hominibus? quanta sunt alia, quae umbra, lignis, quamuis postremo, quae ipsis frondibus seu foliis fiant? — Noli obsecro, inquit ille, interrogationibus eius haec reddere. innumerabilia sunt enim, quae proferri possunt, ex quibus nulla est hominibus utilitas aut certe ita latet uel inbecilla est, ut ab hominibus, praesertim nobis, erui defendiue non possit. ipse potius nos doceat, quomodo aliquid fiat, quod non causa praecesserit. — Post, inquam, ista uidebimus.
但當他正思量該說什麼時,特呂革提烏斯說:「樹叢對人的用處,難道只在於果子嗎?還有多少別的東西,是藉樹蔭、藉木材、乃至最終藉那葉叢或葉子本身而成就的呢?」他說:「求你不要以這些來回答他的盤問。因為可以舉出無數的事物,對人並無用處,或至少隱藏得如此之深、或如此微弱,以致不能被人——尤其被我們——發掘出來或加以維護。倒不如讓他教導我們:沒有先行之因的事,究竟如何得以發生。」我說:「這些,我們日後再看罷。」
But while he was considering what to say, Trygetius said: 'Is the usefulness of groves furnished to men in fruits alone? How many other things there are, which come about by shade, by timber, and, however lastly, by the very foliage or leaves?' 'Do not, I beseech,' said he, 'give these answers to his questions. For there are innumerable things which can be brought forward, from which there is no usefulness to men, or which certainly lie so hidden or are so feeble that they cannot be dug out or defended by men, especially by us. Let him rather teach us how anything comes about which no cause has preceded.' 'Afterward,' said I, 'we shall see these things.'
45:25
non enim iam me necesse est esse doctorem, cum tu, qui iam tantae rei te certum esse professus es, adhuc me nihil docueris nimium discere cupientem et propter hoc solum dies noctesque uigilantem. Quo me mittis? inquit; an quia te leuius sequor quam illa folia uentos, quibus in profluentem iaciuntur, ut eis cadere parum sit, nisi etiam trahantur? nam quid aliud erit, cum Licentius et Augustinum et ea quae sunt in media philosophia docet? — Noli obsecro, inquam, aut te tantum abicere aut me extollere. nam et ego in philosophia puer sum et non nimis curo, cum interrogo, per quem mihi ille respondeat, qui me cotidie querulum accipit, cuius quidem credo quandoque uatem futurum;
因為我已無須再作教師了,既然你既已宣稱自己對如此重大之事確有把握,卻至今對我這極其渴望學習、單為此故日夜警醒的人一無所教。他說:「你要把我打發到哪裡去?難道是因為我跟隨你,比那些葉子跟隨風還要輕率嗎——那些葉子被拋入奔流之中,以致單單墜落還不夠,還要被水拖曳而去?當黎森提烏斯竟教導奧古斯丁、又教導那些處於哲學核心之事時,還能是別的什麼呢?」我說:「我求你,不要如此貶抑自己,也不要抬舉我。因為我在哲學上也不過是個孩童,當我發問時,我並不太在意那一位藉著誰來回答我——祂每日接納我這滿腹怨言的人,而我確信你有朝一日必作祂的先知;
For it is no longer necessary that I be the teacher, since you, who have already professed yourself certain of so great a matter, have so far taught nothing to me, who am exceedingly eager to learn and who for this reason alone keep watch day and night. 'Where are you sending me?' he says; 'or is it because I follow you more lightly than those leaves follow the winds, leaves which are cast into the flowing stream so that it is not enough for them to fall unless they are also dragged along? For what else will it be, when Licentius teaches both Augustine and the very matters that lie in the midst of philosophy?' 'Do not, I beg you,' I said, 'either cast yourself down so low or exalt me. For I too am but a child in philosophy, and I do not much care, when I put a question, through whom that One answers me who receives me daily as a complainer, and of whom indeed I believe you will one day be the prophet;
45:26
neque hoc \'quandoque\' 15 forsitan longum est. sed tamen alii quoque multum sepositi ab huius modi studiis docere aliquid possunt, cum disserentium societati quasi uinculis interrogationum coartantur. idem autem aliquid non est nihil. an non uides — tuo enim simili utar libentius — illa ipsa folia, quae feruntur uentis, quae undis innatant, resistere aliquantum praecipitanti se flumini et de rerum ordine homines commonere, si tamen hoc, quod abs te defenditur, uerum est ? Hic ille lecto etiam exiliens prae laetitia: Quis neget, deus magne, inquit, te cuncta ordine administrare ? quam se omnia tenent! quam ratis successionibus in nodos suos urgentur!
而這「有朝一日」或許並不遙遠。然而,即便另有一些人,雖遠離此類研究,卻也能教導些什麼,當他們彷彿被問題的鎖鏈所束縛,被納入推理者的團契之中。而教導些什麼,並非什麼都不教。難道你沒看見嗎——我很樂意用你自己的比喻——正是那些被風吹送、在浪上漂浮的葉子,稍稍抵抗著那將它們急速捲走的河流,並提醒人們注意萬物的秩序,倘若你所主張的果真是真的?」聽了這話,他甚至歡喜得從床上跳起,說:「偉大的神啊,誰能否認祢按秩序治理萬有?萬物是何等地彼此維繫!它們以何等固定的接續被推入各自的關節之中!
and this 'one day' is perhaps not far off. Yet even others, though far removed from studies of this kind, are able to teach something, when they are constrained, as if by the fetters of questions, into the fellowship of those who reason. And to teach something is not to teach nothing. Do you not see — for I would gladly use your own comparison — those very leaves that are borne along by the winds, that float upon the waves, resisting a little the river that hurls them headlong, and reminding men of the order of things, if indeed that which you maintain is true?' At this he, leaping up even from his bed for joy, said: 'Who could deny, O great God, that You administer all things in order? How all things hold together! By what fixed successions they are pressed on into their own knots!
45:27
quanta et quam multa facta sunt, ut haec loqueremur! quanta fiunt, ut te inueniamus! unde enim hoc ipsum nisi ex rerum ordine manat et ducitur, quod euigilauimus, quod illum sonum aduertisti, quod quaesisti tecum causam, quod tu causam tantillae rei non inuenisti ? sorex etiam prodit, ut ego uigilans prodar. postremo tuus etiam ipse sermo te fortasse id non agente — non enim cuiquam in potestate est, quid ueniat in mentem — sic nescio quo modo circumagitur, ut me ipse doceat, quid tibi debeam respondere.
何等重大、何等眾多的事都已成就,好叫我們能說出這些話!何等偉大的事正在發生,好叫我們能尋見祢!因為除了出於萬物的秩序,這事本身還能從何處流出並衍生呢——就是我們醒了,就是你留意到那聲響,就是你在心裡尋思其緣由,就是你未能找出這樣微小之事的緣故?連一隻鼩鼱也走了出來,好使我這醒著的人被引了出來。末了,你自己的言談,或許並非出於你的本意——因為什麼念頭湧上心頭並不在任何人的能力之內——竟不知如何地這般繞轉,以致它本身教導我當如何回答你。」
How great and how many things have come to pass, that we might speak these words! How great things are happening, that we might find You! For whence does this very thing flow and derive, except from the order of things — that we awoke, that you noticed that sound, that you sought within yourself the cause, that you did not find the cause of so tiny a matter? Even a shrew-mouse comes forth, that I, being awake, might be brought forth. Finally your very own discourse, perhaps without your intending it — for it is not in anyone's power what comes into his mind — is somehow so turned about that it itself teaches me what I ought to answer you.'
45:28
namque oro te, si haec, quae a nobis dicta sunt, litteris, ut instituisti, mandata peruagentur paulo latius ad hominum famam, nonne ita res magna uidetur, ut de illa consultus aliqui uates magnus aut Chaldeus respondere debuerit, multo antequam euenit ? quodsi respondisset, ita diuinus diceretur, ita efferretur laudibus omnium, ut tamen ex eo nemo quaereret, cur folium ex arbore ceciderit aut utrum mus oberrans iacenti homini molestus fuerit. numquidnam enim talia futura quisquam illorum aut per se dixit aliquando aut a consultore coactus est dicere ?
「因為我懇求你:倘若我們所說的這些話,如你所安排的付諸文字,稍稍更廣地傳入眾人的認知,這事豈不顯得如此重大,以致某位偉大的先知或迦勒底占星師,若被就此諮詢,理當在事情發生之前甚早便作出答覆?而若他真答覆了,他就要被稱為如此神明,如此為眾人的稱讚所推崇,然而卻無人由此去問:為何一片葉子從樹上落下,或那四處奔跑的老鼠是否騷擾了躺著的人。因為他們當中,可曾有誰主動說過這類事將要發生,或被詢問者逼問而說出?
'For I beseech you: if these things which have been said by us should, committed to writing as you have arranged, spread somewhat more widely into the knowledge of men, does not the matter seem so great that some mighty seer or Chaldean, when consulted about it, ought to have given an answer long before it came to pass? And if he had answered, he would be called so divine, he would be so extolled with everyone's praises, that yet no one from this would ask why a leaf fell from a tree, or whether a mouse running about was a nuisance to a man lying down. For did any of them ever say of his own accord that such things would come to pass, or was he compelled by an inquirer to say it?
45:29
atqui si futurum quendam librum non ignobilem diceret et id necessario euenturum uideret — non enim posset aliter diuinare — profecto quidquid uolutatio foliorum in agro, quidquid uilissima bestiola in domo facit, tam sunt in rerum ordine necessaria quam illae litterae. his enim uerbis fiunt, quae sine illis praecedentibus uilissimis rebus nec in mentem uenire possent nec ore procedere posterisque mandari. quare iam, rogo, nemo ex me quaerat, cur quidque fiat. satis est nihil fieri, nihil gigni, quod non aliqua causa genuerit ac mouerit. Apparet te, inquam, nescire, adulescens, quam multa et a qualibus uiris contra diuinationem dicta sint.
「然而,倘若他預言將來會有某本不算平庸的書問世,並看出那必然會發生——因為否則他就無法作出預言——那麼確實,田野中葉子的任何翻捲,家中最卑微的小生物所做的任何事,在萬物的秩序中都與那些文字同樣必然。因為正是藉著這些話語,它們才得以成就,而這些話語若沒有那些在先的、最卑微之事,便既不能湧上心頭,也不能出於口舌,更不能傳給後世。故此如今我請求,願無人向我追問每一件事為何發生。只要知道:沒有任何事物產生,沒有任何事物被生出,而不是由某個緣由所生所動,這就夠了。」我說:「年輕人,顯然你不知道有多少人、又是何等樣的人,曾說出反對占卜的話。」
And yet if he were to say that some not undistinguished book would exist in the future, and were to see that it would necessarily come to pass — for otherwise he could not divine it — then assuredly whatever tossing of leaves in a field, whatever the meanest little creature does in a house, is as necessary in the order of things as those writings. For by these words they come to be, words which, without those preceding, meanest of things, could neither come into the mind nor issue from the mouth nor be handed down to posterity. Wherefore now, I ask, let no one seek from me why each thing comes to pass. It is enough that nothing comes to be, nothing is begotten, which some cause has not begotten and set in motion.' 'It is plain,' I said, 'young man, that you do not know how many things, and by what sort of men, have been said against divination.'
45:30
sed responde nunc, non utrum fiat aliquid sine causa — nam id iam uideo te nolle respondere — sed ordo iste susceptus tuus bonumne quicquam an malum tibi esse uideatur. — Et ille submorans: Non, inquit, sic rogasti, ut unum de duobus queam respondere. uideo hic enim quandam medietatem. nam ordo mihi nec bonum nec malum uidetur. — Quid saltem censes, inquam, ordini esse contrarium ? — Nihil, ait ille; nam quomodo esse quicquam contrarium potest ei rei, quae totum occupauit, totum obtinuit? quod enim erit ordini contrarium, necesse erit esse praeter ordinem; nihil autem esse praeter ordinem uideo: nihil igitur ordini oportet putare esse contrarium.
「但如今你回答我——不是問是否有什麼事無緣由地發生,因為我已看出你不願回答此問——而是問:你所採納的這秩序,在你看來是善還是惡?」他略略遲疑地說:「你並沒有這樣提問,使我能在二者中擇一而答。因為在此我看見某種中間地帶。因為在我看來,秩序既非善也非惡。」我說:「那麼至少,你認為什麼與秩序相反?」他說:「什麼也沒有;因為那已佔據了全體、掌握了全體之物,怎能有什麼與之相反呢?因為凡與秩序相反之物,必然是在秩序之外;但我看見沒有什麼在秩序之外:所以不該認為有什麼與秩序相反。」
'But answer now — not whether anything comes to pass without a cause, for I already see that you are unwilling to answer that — but whether this order you have taken up seems to you to be something good or something bad.' And he, hesitating a little: 'You did not,' he said, 'so put the question that I can answer one of the two. For here I see a certain middle ground. For order seems to me neither good nor bad.' 'What at least,' I said, 'do you judge to be contrary to order?' 'Nothing,' he said; 'for how can anything be contrary to that thing which has occupied the whole, has taken possession of the whole? For whatever shall be contrary to order must needs be outside order; but I see that nothing is outside order: therefore one ought to think nothing contrary to order.'
45:31
— Ergone, ait Trygetius, contrarius ordini error non est? — Nullo modo, inquit; nam neminem uideo errare sine causa; causarum autem series ordine includitur et error ipse non solum gignitur causa sed etiam gignit aliquid, cui e causa fit. quam ob rem quo extra ordinem non est, eo non potest ordini esse contrarius.
特里格提烏斯說:「那麼錯誤豈不與秩序相反嗎?」他說:「絕非如此;因為我看見沒有人無緣由地犯錯;而諸緣由的鏈條包含在秩序之內,錯誤本身不僅由緣由所生,也生出某事,並為那事成為緣由。因此,正因它不在秩序之外,它便不能與秩序相反。」
'Is not then error contrary to order?' said Trygetius. 'By no means,' he said; 'for I see that no one errs without a cause; and the chain of causes is included in order, and error itself is not only begotten by a cause but also begets something, for which it becomes a cause. For which reason, insofar as it is not outside order, so far it cannot be contrary to order.'
45:32
Et cum tacuisset Trygetius egoque me ipsum non caperem gaudio, quod uidebam adulescentem, carissimi amici filium, etiam meum fieri, nec solum, uerum in amicum quoque iam mihi surgere atque grandescere et, cuius studium uel in mediocres litteras desperaueram, quasi respecta possessione sua toto impetu in mediam uenire philosophiam — quod dum tacitus miror et exaestuo in gratulatione, subito ille quasi mente quadam correptus exclamat:s o si possem dicere quod uolo! rogo, ubiubi estis, uerba, succurrite. et bona et mala in ordine sunt. credite, si uultis; nam quomodo id explicem nescio. Ego mirabar et tacebam.
當特里格提烏斯緘默下來,而我幾乎按捺不住喜樂,因為我看見這年輕人——我至親好友之子——竟也成了我自己的,而且不僅如此,更真真切切在我眼前興起、成長為一位朋友;他那份熱忱,我原本連對中等文學都已絕望,如今卻彷彿眼見自己的產業,以全副衝勁奔向哲學的正中——正當我默默驚嘆、在慶賀中心潮澎湃之際,他忽然彷彿被某種心靈所攫住,喊道:「唉,但願我能說出我所願說的!我求你們,無論你們在何處,言語啊,來救助我。善事與惡事都在秩序之中。你們若願意,就相信吧;因為我不知如何解說它。」我驚嘆著,默然不語。
And when Trygetius had fallen silent, and I could scarcely contain myself for joy, because I saw the young man, the son of a most dear friend, becoming even my own — and not only that, but truly rising up and growing into a friend to me — and because he whose zeal I had despaired of even for middling letters was, as if with an eye to his own possession, coming with all his impetus into the very midst of philosophy — while I silently marvel at this and burn inwardly with congratulation, suddenly he, as if seized by some inspiration of mind, cried out: 'Oh, if only I could say what I wish! I beg you, wherever you are, O words, come to my aid. Both good things and evil things are in order. Believe it, if you will; for how to explain it I do not know.' I was marveling, and kept silent.
45:33
Trygetius autem ubi uidit hominem paululum quasi digesta ebrietate affabilem factum redditumque conloquio: Absurdum, inquit, mihi uidetur, Licenti, et plane alienum a ueritate quod dicis; sed quaeso patiare me paululum nec proturbes clamitando. —Dic quod uis, ait ille; non enim metuo, ne me auferas ab eo, quod uideo ac paene teneo. — Utinam, inquit, ab eo quem defendis ordine deuius non sis! non tanta in deum feraris, ut mitius loquar, incuria. quid enim potuit dici magis impium quam etiam mala ordine contineri ? certe enim deus amat ordinem. —Uero amat, ait ille; ab ipso manat, cum ipso est, et si quid potest de re tantum alta conuenientius dici, cogita quaeso ipse tecum.
但特里格提烏斯見那人彷彿醉意已消,重又變得和藹可親、恢復了交談,便說:「黎森提烏斯,你所說的在我看來荒謬,且顯然與真理相悖;但我請你容我片刻,不要以叫嚷把我壓倒。」他說:「你想說什麼就說吧;因為我不怕你會把我從我所看見、幾乎已把握之物那裡奪走。」他說:「但願你不曾偏離你所辯護的那秩序本身!願你不至於——說得溫和些——如此漠視神地被沖走。因為還有什麼比說連惡也包含在秩序之中更褻瀆的呢?因為神確實愛秩序。」他說:「祂確實愛它;它從祂而流出,與祂同在;至於能否就這樣崇高之事說出更合宜的話,我求你自己在心裡思量吧。
But Trygetius, when he saw the man become somewhat affable again, as if his intoxication had been digested, and restored to conversation, said: 'It seems to me absurd, Licentius, and plainly foreign to the truth, what you say; but I beg you to allow me a little, and not to overwhelm me with shouting.' 'Say what you will,' he said; 'for I do not fear that you will carry me away from that which I see and almost hold.' 'Would,' he said, 'that you were not straying from the very order you defend! May you not be borne along in such — to speak more mildly — carelessness toward God. For what could be said more impious than that even evils are contained in order? For surely God loves order.' 'Truly He loves it,' he said; 'from Him it flows, with Him it is; and if anything can be said more fitly about a matter so lofty, ponder it yourself, I pray, within your own mind.
45:34
nec enim sum idoneus, qui te ista nunc doceam. — Quid cogitem ? inquit Trygetius; accipio prorsus quod dicis satisque mihi est in eo, quod intellego. certe enim et mala dixisti ordine contineri et ipsum ordinem manare a summo deo atque ab eo diligi. ex quo sequitur, ut et mala sint a summo deo et mala deus diligat. In qua conclusione timui Licentio. at ille ingemescens difficultate uerborum nec omnino quaerens, quid responderet, sed quem ad modum quod respondendum erat promeret: Non diligit deus mala, inquit, nec ob aliud, nisi quia ordinis non est, ut et deus mala diligat; et ordinem ideo multum diligit, quia per eum non diligit mala.
因為我此刻不配教你這些事。」特里格提烏斯說:「我該思量什麼呢?我全然接受你所說的,而我在我所理解的範圍內已感滿足。因為你確實既說了惡包含在秩序之中,又說了秩序本身從至高的神而流出、並為祂所愛。由此便可推出:惡既出於至高的神,神也愛惡。」聽到這結論,我為黎森提烏斯擔憂。但他因言辭之艱難而呻吟,卻絲毫不是在尋找該答什麼,而是尋思當以何種方式道出所該答的,說:「神不愛惡,其緣故無他,正因為神愛惡並不合於秩序;而祂之所以極愛秩序,正因為藉著秩序祂不愛惡。
For I am not fit to teach you these things now.' 'What should I ponder?' said Trygetius; 'I accept outright what you say, and it is enough for me in what I understand. For surely you have said both that evils are contained in order, and that order itself flows from the most high God and is loved by Him. From which it follows that both evils are from the most high God, and that God loves evils.' At this conclusion I feared for Licentius. But he, groaning at the difficulty of the words, and not at all seeking what he should answer but in what manner he might bring forth what had to be answered, said: 'God does not love evils, and for no other reason than because it is not of order that God should love evils; and He therefore greatly loves order, because through it He does not love evils.
45:35
at uero ipsa mala qui possunt non esse in ordine, cum deus illa non diligat ? nam iste ipse est malorum ordo, ut non diligantur a deo. an paruus rerum ordo tibi uidetur, ut et bona deus diligat et non diligat mala? ita nec praeter ordinem sunt mala, quae non diligit deus, et ipsum tamen ordinem diligit; hoc ipsum enim diligit, diligere bona et non diligere mala, quod est magni ordinis et diuinae dispositionis. qui ordo atque dispositio quia uniuersitatis congruentiam ipsa distinctione custodit, fit, ut mala etiam esse necesse sit. ita quasi ex antithetis quodam modo, quod nobis etiam in oratione iucundum est, ex contrariis, omnium simul rerum pulchritudo figuratur.
但既然神不愛惡,惡本身又怎能不在秩序之中呢?因為這正是惡的秩序,就是它們不為神所愛。抑或在你看來,神既愛善又不愛惡,這是微不足道的秩序嗎?如此,神所不愛的惡並不在秩序之外,而祂卻愛那秩序本身;因為祂所愛的正是這一點——愛善而不愛惡——這屬於偉大的秩序與神聖的安排。而這秩序與安排,正因藉著這區別而保守了宇宙的和諧,於是便使得惡的存在也成為必然。如此,彷彿由對反之詞——那甚至在言談中也令我們愉悅的手法——由相反之物,萬物並列的整體之美便得以構成。
But how can evils themselves not be in order, since God does not love them? For this very thing is the order of evils, that they be not loved by God. Or does it seem to you a small order of things, that God both loves goods and does not love evils? Thus evils, which God does not love, are not outside order, and yet He loves the order itself; for this very thing He loves — to love goods and not to love evils — which belongs to the great order and the divine disposition. And because this order and disposition preserves the harmony of the universe by that very distinction, it comes about that it is even necessary that evils exist. Thus, as it were from antitheses, in a certain manner which is pleasing to us even in speech, out of opposites the beauty of all things together is fashioned.
45:36
Post hoc intersiluit modice et repente sese erigens, qua Trygetius lectum habebat: Nam quaero ex te, quaeso, inquit, iustusne sit deus. — Tacebat ille nimis, ut postea retulit, ammirans et horrens subito condiscipuli et familiaris sui afflatum noua inspiratione sermonem. quo tacente ille ita secutus est: Si enim deum iustum non esse responderis, tu uideris quid agas, qui me dudum impietatis arguebas. si autem, ut nobis traditur nosque ipsius ordinis necessitate sentimus, iustus est deus, sua cuique distribuendo utique iustus est. quae autem distributio dici potest, ubi distinctio nulla est? aut quae distinctio, si bona sunt omnia?
說完這話,他略略停頓,忽然向特里格提烏斯床鋪所在的那一側挺起身來,說:「因為我求問你:神是否公義。」那人默然良久,正如他後來所述,驚異並戰慄於他同窗密友被一種新的默感所吹拂的言談。當那人緘默時,這人便如此接下去:「因為你若回答說神不公義,那麼你這先前指控我不虔的人,就當留意自己在做什麼。但倘若——正如所傳給我們、我們自己也憑秩序的必然性所領會的——神是公義的,那麼祂將各人當得的分給各人,便確實是公義的。可是若毫無區別,又能說什麼分配呢?或者若萬物皆善,又有什麼區別呢?
After this he paused moderately, and suddenly raising himself up toward the side where Trygetius had his bed: 'For I ask of you, I beg,' he said, 'whether God is just.' The other was silent for a very long time, as he afterwards related, marveling and shuddering at the utterance of his fellow-pupil and intimate friend, breathed upon by a new inspiration. And as he kept silent, the other continued thus: 'For if you shall have answered that God is not just, look you to what you are doing, you who a little while ago were accusing me of impiety. But if — as it is handed down to us and as we ourselves perceive by the very necessity of order — God is just, then by distributing to each his own He is assuredly just. But what distribution can be spoken of where there is no distinction? Or what distinction, if all things are good?
45:37
quidue praeter ordinem reperiri potest, si dei iustitia bonorum malorumque meritis sua cuique redduntur? iustum autem deum omnes fatemur: totum igitur ordine includitur. — Quibus dictis relisit se strato et iam lenior uoce, cum ei uerbum nemo faceret: Nihilne mihi, inquit, uel tu, qui conpulisti ad ista, respondes? Cui ego: Noua nunc religio istaec in te incessit, cedo, inquam. sed quod uidebitur, per diem respondebo, qui mihi iam uidetur redire, nisi lunae est ille qui fenestris fulgor induitur. simul et tacendum est, ne tanta bona tua, Licenti, absorbeat obliuio. quando enim nostrae litterae non sibi haec mandari flagitent? dicam plane tibi quod sentio.
「或者若按神的公義,照著善人與惡人的功過,把各人當得的分給各人,又有什麼能在秩序之外被找到呢?而神是公義的,我們眾人都承認:所以全體都包含在秩序之中。」說完這話,他重又倒回榻上,此時既無人向他答話,便以較溫和的聲音說:「你們都不回答我嗎?連你——那把我逼到這地步的人——也不回答嗎?」我對他說:「這新的虔誠如今臨到你身上了;我說,且讓步吧。但凡覺得合宜的,我要在白晝作答,白晝如今在我看來似乎正在回返——除非那從窗戶灌入的光輝乃是月光。同時我們也當靜默,免得遺忘吞沒你這樣重大的美善,黎森提烏斯。因為我們的著作幾時不要求把這些事託付給它呢?我要坦白告訴你我的感受。
Or what can be found outside order, if by the justice of God, according to the merits of good and evil men, to each his own is rendered? But that God is just we all confess: therefore the whole is included in order.' Having said this, he sank back upon his couch, and now in a gentler voice, since no one made a word to him: 'Do you make me no answer,' he said, 'not even you, who compelled me to these things?' To whom I: 'This new religiousness has now come upon you; give way, I say. But what shall seem good, I will answer by daylight, which now seems to me to be returning — unless it is the moon's radiance that is poured in through the windows. At the same time we must be silent, lest oblivion swallow up such great goods of yours, Licentius. For when will our writings not demand that these things be committed to them? I will plainly tell you what I feel.
45:38
disputabo aduersus te, quantum possum; non enim mihi, si me uiceris, maior triumphus dari potest. si autem uel calliditati uel acuto cuidam errori hominum, quorum partes suscipere temptabo, cesserit inbecillitas tua, quae minus pasta eruditione disciplinarum tantum deum fortasse sustinere non poterit, res te ipsa commonebit, quantae tibi uires, ut in eum firmior redeas, parandae sint, simul quia et istam disputationem nostram elimatius uolo prouenire; non enim grossis auribus eam debeo. nam Zenobius noster multa mecum saepe de rerum ordine contulit, cui alta percontanti numquam satisfacere potui seu propter obscuritatem rerum seu propter temporum angustias.
「我要盡我所能與你辯論;因為若你勝過我,沒有比這更大的凱旋能賜給我了。但倘若你的軟弱——因較少受學科訓練的滋養,或許無法承受如此偉大的神——竟屈服於我將要扮演其角色的那些人的狡詐或某種尖銳的謬誤,那麼事情本身就會提醒你:你必須預備何等的力量,好使你更剛強地回轉來抵擋它。同時,我也希望我們這場辯論能更加精煉地問世;因為我不該把它交給粗魯的耳朵。因為我們的朋友澤諾比烏斯常與我多次論及萬物的秩序,他就崇高之事發問,我卻從未能使他滿意,或因事情的晦澀,或因時間的短促。
I will dispute against you, as much as I can; for no greater triumph can be given me than if you overcome me. But if your weakness — which, being less nourished by the training of the disciplines, will perhaps not be able to sustain so great a God — should yield to the craftiness or to some sharp error of men, whose part I shall try to take up, the matter itself will remind you how great strength you must prepare, that you may return the stronger against it. At the same time, I wish this disputation of ours to come out more polished; for I ought not to entrust it to coarse ears. For our friend Zenobius has often conferred much with me about the order of things, and, though he questioned me on lofty matters, I could never satisfy him, whether because of the obscurity of the things or because of the shortness of time.
下一段 →
← 第 44 章第 46 章 →
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。