📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 書信與論戰集(CSEL)

書信與論戰集(CSEL) 第 22 章 第 2/4 段

拉丁文原文.37 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 22:40–22:76(全章共 135 節)

← 第 21 章第 23 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
22:40
nunc uero cum hesterno die libellum curatori dederis et publice clamitaueris cum codicibus tuis te paratum esse incendi, si quid mali in ipsis fuerit inuentum, unde heri leges flagitabas quasi fortis, hodie ueritatem fugis ut timidus? FEL. dixit: Non ueritatem fugio. AUG. dixit: Dic ergo, si uides deum facie ad faciem secundum polliciationem tuam, quia dixisti apostolum Paulum de uobis dixisse, quia tam plenam ueritatem accepturi essetis, ut intellegamus uel credamus apostolum habuisse ex parte et te totum. FEL. dixit: Non ueritatem fugio, sed ueritatem quaero. quod tu dicis, quia non teneo, probetur mihi per scripturas deificas . hoc quaero iam. . AUG. dixit:
但如今,既然你昨日向管理官呈上了一份呈文,並帶著你的書卷公開喊叫,說若在其中發現任何邪惡之物,你甘願被焚燒——因此你昨日彷彿勇士般索求律法——今日你竟像膽怯的人逃避真理麼?斐利克斯說:我並不逃避真理。奧古斯丁說:那麼你就說,你是否照你所應許的面對面看見神——因為你說使徒保羅論到你們,說你們要領受如此完全的真理,以致我們可以明白或相信使徒所有的是一部分、而你所有的是全部。斐利克斯說:我並不逃避真理,乃是尋求真理。你說我所不持守的,請藉神聖的聖經向我證明。這正是我如今所尋求的。奧古斯丁說:
But now, since yesterday you gave a petition to the curator and publicly cried out with your books that you were prepared to be burned, if anything evil should be found in them—whence yesterday you demanded the laws as though a brave man—today do you flee from the truth as a timid man? Felix said: I do not flee from the truth. Augustine said: Then say, if you see God face to face according to your promise—for you said that the apostle Paul spoke of you, that you were to receive so full a truth that we might understand or believe that the apostle had it in part and you the whole. Felix said: I do not flee from the truth, but I seek the truth. What you say that I do not hold, let it be proved to me through the divine Scriptures. This is what I now seek. Augustine said:
22:41
Prius profitere te non potuisse probare Manichaeum apostolum Iesu Christi ; . et quantum potuero, cum omnia exstirpata fuerint contraria de corde tuo per ministerium meum donante domino, insero tibi quae sit scientia . ueritatis, quae perducat ad deum initians a fide. FEL. dixit: Quia hoc dicis tu, ut legem meam negem et alteram accipiam, meliorem dumtaxat, quod quaero ego, non hoc respondeo, ut legem meam negem, antequam alteram accipiam. AUG. dixit: Sed prius de uase funditur, quod aduersum habet, et sic inpletur, quod bonum est; aut si adhuc dubitas fundere, defende, quo plenus es.
你先承認你不能證明摩尼是耶穌基督的使徒;然後,就我所能及的,等一切相反之物藉我的職事、靠主的恩賜從你心中連根拔除之後,我要將那引人歸神、以信德為起點的真理知識栽種於你。斐利克斯說:既然你這樣說——要我否認我的律法而領受另一律法,只要它更好,這正是我所尋求的——我不這樣回答,以致在領受那另一律法之前先否認我的律法。奧古斯丁說:但器皿裡所盛相反之物必須先倒出來,那好的才得以充滿其中;不然,你若仍遲疑不肯倒出,那就為你所滿盛的辯護吧。
First profess that you could not prove that Mani is an apostle of Jesus Christ; and, as far as I shall be able, when all things contrary shall have been rooted out of your heart through my ministry, by the Lord's gift, I will graft into you what is the knowledge of the truth which leads to God, beginning from faith. Felix said: Since you say this—that I should deny my law and receive another, provided it be better, which is what I seek—I do not answer thus, so as to deny my law before I receive the other. Augustine said: But first that is poured out of a vessel which it holds contrary, and thus is filled up that which is good; or, if you still hesitate to pour out, defend that of which you are full.
22:42
ostendam enim tibi, quantum me dominus adiuuat, quanta inmunditia et blasphemiis plena sit doctrina Manichaei, si permittas, ut legatur illa epistula, de cuius initio iam tractauimus et non potuisti probare apostolum Christi esse Manichaeum. sed ideo moras innectis, ne cetera legantur, ubi aperte uestra sacrilegia deprehenduntur; ant si permittis, legantur. FEL. dixit: Permitto, quia dixisti omnia inmunda fundi et sic bona inmitti; hoc enim dictum est sanctitatis tuae. ad quod et ego dico: nullus aquam fundit, nisi alter adinpleuerit. AUG. dixit: Hoc uide quam inconsiderate dixeris, ut mitius loquar et non dicam insane. utique de uase tibi similitudinem posui;
因為我要向你顯明,就我所能、靠主幫助我的程度,摩尼的教訓充滿了何等的污穢與褻瀆,只要你容許宣讀那封書信——它的開頭我們已經處理過,而你不能證明摩尼是基督的使徒。但你正因這緣故編織拖延,唯恐下文被宣讀,因為在那裡你們的褻瀆罪行就要公然被察出;不然,你若容許,就讓它被宣讀吧。斐利克斯說:我容許,既然你說一切不潔之物都倒出來、好使美善之物注入;因為這是你聖尊所說的。對此我也說:若非別人先倒空,無人能注入水。奧古斯丁說:你看你說得多麼不加思量——好讓我說得溫和些,不說你是瘋狂的。我確是用器皿的比喻向你陳明的;
For I will show you, as much as the Lord helps me, with how much uncleanness and blasphemies the doctrine of Mani is full, if you permit that epistle to be read, of whose beginning we have already treated, and you could not prove that Mani is an apostle of Christ. But for this reason you weave delays, lest the rest be read, where your sacrileges are openly detected; or, if you permit, let them be read. Felix said: I permit, since you said that all unclean things are poured out and thus good things are put in; for this was said by your Holiness. To which I too say: no one pours in water, unless another has emptied it. Augustine said: See how inconsiderately you have spoken, to speak more mildly and not say insanely. Surely I set before you the likeness from a vessel;
22:43
in uas plenum nemo potest aliquid mittere, nisi fundatur illud, quo plenum erat. FEL. dixit: Unum dixisti et ego dixi duo. AUG. dixit: Si duo uasa dixisti, uis illum parem tuum fundimus et inplemus illum, ut possis tu fundere, quod habes ? FEL. dixit: Ambo unam aquam habemus. AUG. dixit: Cum ergo ambo pleni sitis aqua uestra, quid inplebimus, ut doceamus uos, nisi aliquis uestrum fuderit, quod habet? aut si bonum est et ideo debet teneri, ut defendatur et legatur illa epistula, uideamus, si uel cetera possunt defendi, si in ipso initio defecisti; aut si dicis te in illo non defecisse, proba nobis quomodo sit Manichaeus apostolus Christi. FEL. dixit:
沒有人能把任何東西放進一個已滿的器皿,除非把它所盛滿的先倒出來。斐利克斯說:你說一個,我卻說兩個。奧古斯丁說:你若說是兩個器皿,你可願意我們倒空你那同伴的器皿並把它充滿,好使你能倒出你所有的麼?斐利克斯說:我們兩個都盛著同一種水。奧古斯丁說:那麼,既然你們兩個都盛滿了你們自己的水,我們要充滿什麼、好教導你們呢,除非你們中有一位倒出他所盛的?不然,若那是美善的、因此當被保守,以致那封書信可以被辯護、被宣讀,就讓我們看看下文至少能否被辯護,倘若你在它的開頭就已失敗了;不然,你若說你在那裡並未失敗,就向我們證明摩尼如何是基督的使徒。斐利克斯說:
into a full vessel no one can put anything, unless that with which it was full is poured out. Felix said: You said one, and I said two. Augustine said: If you said two vessels, do you wish that we empty your fellow vessel and fill it, so that you can pour out what you have? Felix said: We both have one water. Augustine said: Since therefore you are both full of your own water, what shall we fill, that we may teach you, unless one of you pours out what he has? Or, if it is good and therefore ought to be kept, so that that epistle may be defended and read, let us see whether the rest at least can be defended, if you have failed at its very beginning; or, if you say that you did not fail in it, prove to us how Mani is an apostle of Christ. Felix said:
22:44
Christus dixit spiritum sanctum missurum se, qui in omnem ueritatem inducat. AUG. dixit: Si habes illum, adtende, quod te iamdudum interrogaui. dixisti enim ad ipsius doctrinam pertinere etiam ista mundana cognoscere . dic mihi: quot sunt stellae, si introductus es in istam omnem ueritatem? FEL. dixit: Et ego dico, quia, si paracletus per apostolos locutus est, et per Paulum; et ego peto sanctitatem tuam, ut illa mihi ostendas, quae iam dixi. AUG. dixit: Confitere te non potuisse ostendere, quod ego interrogaui, et ostendam secundum scripturas, quod pertineat ad fidem christianam. FEL. dixit:
基督說他要差聖靈來,那位要引導人進入一切真理。奧古斯丁說:你若有他,就留心我方才所問你的。因為你說知道這些屬世的事也屬於他的教訓。告訴我:星有幾顆,倘若你已被引導進入那全部真理?斐利克斯說:我也說,倘若保惠師藉眾使徒說話,就也藉保羅說話;我也求你的聖尊,將我已提及的那些事指給我看。奧古斯丁說:你承認你不能顯明我所問的,我便要照聖經顯明何為屬於基督徒信仰的事。斐利克斯說:
Christ said that he would send the Holy Spirit, who leads into all truth. Augustine said: If you have him, attend to what I asked you a while ago. For you said that to know these worldly things also pertains to his doctrine. Tell me: how many are the stars, if you have been led into that whole truth? Felix said: I too say that, if the Paraclete spoke through the apostles, then also through Paul; and I ask your Holiness to show me those things which I have already mentioned. Augustine said: Confess that you could not show what I asked, and I will show, according to the Scriptures, what pertains to the Christian faith. Felix said:
22:45
Et ego, si ad.tuleris mihi scripturas Manichaei, quinque auctores, quos tibi dixi, quicquid me interrogaueris, probo tibi. AUG. dixit: De ipsis quinque auctoribus est ista epistula, cuius aperuimus principium et inuenimus ibi scriptum: Manichaeus apostolus Christi Iesu . et uideo, quia ipsum non mihi principium exponis, quia non probas, quomodo sit Manichaeus apostolus Iesu Christi. FEL. dixit: Si in ista non probo, in secundo probo. AUG. dixit: In quo secundo? FEL. dixit: In Thesauro. AUG. dixit: Thesaurum istum, quem ideo tali nomine appellatis, ut miseros seducatis, quis scripsit ? Manichaeus . nolo mihi ab illo probes: quia ipse Manichaeus mentitur dicendo se esse, quod non est. FEL.
我也如此,你若把摩尼的著作、就是我對你所提名的那五位作者的書帶給我,無論你問我什麼,我都要向你證明。奧古斯丁說:這封書信正出於那五位作者,我們已打開了它的開頭,並在那裡找到寫著:「摩尼,基督耶穌的使徒。」我看出你並不向我解說那開頭本身,因為你證明不出摩尼如何是耶穌基督的使徒。斐利克斯說:我若在這一本裡證明不出,就在第二本裡證明。奧古斯丁說:在哪個第二本裡?斐利克斯說:在《寶藏》裡。奧古斯丁說:這《寶藏》,你們以這樣的名字稱它,為要迷惑那些可憐的人,是誰寫的呢?摩尼。我不要你從他那裡向我證明:因為摩尼自己就說謊,說自己是他所不是的。斐利克斯。
And I too, if you bring me the Scriptures of Mani, the five authors whom I named to you, whatever you ask me, I will prove to you. Augustine said: Of those same five authors is this epistle, whose beginning we opened, and we found written there: 'Mani, an apostle of Christ Jesus.' And I see that you do not expound to me that very beginning, because you do not prove how Mani is an apostle of Jesus Christ. Felix said: If I do not prove it in this one, I prove it in the second. Augustine said: In what second? Felix said: In the Treasure. Augustine said: This 'Treasure,' which you call by such a name in order to seduce the wretched, who wrote it? Mani. I will not have you prove it to me from him: because Mani himself lies by saying that he is what he is not. Felix.
22:46
dixit: Tu mihi proba per alterum. AUG. dixit: Quid uis tibi probem? FEL. dixit: Quia mentitur Manichaeus. AUG. dixit: Quia tu non potes probare uerum dicere Manichaeum, oportet, ut ego probem mentitum Manichaeum esse? FEL. dixit: Quare non potui probare? numquid prolatae sunt scripturae, quas ego petiui, et non probaui? AUG. dixit: Sed scripturas Manichaei petis, quibus fidem non habemus; aliunde proba. ego autem de ipsa scriptura Manichaei tibi probo mentitum esse Manichaeum et blasphemasse Manichaeum. FEL. dixit: Afferantur libri. AUG. dixit: Praesens est epistula Manichaei, quam dicitis Fundamenti. initium nullum est in aedificio, nisi fundamentum .
他說:請你藉另一部書向我證明。奧古斯丁說:你要我向你證明什麼?斐利克斯說:證明摩尼說謊。奧古斯丁說:既然你不能證明摩尼說真話,難道就必得我來證明摩尼說了謊麼?斐利克斯說:我為何不能證明?我所求的聖經豈曾被拿出來、而我卻證明不出麼?奧古斯丁說:可是你所求的是摩尼的著作,我們對它並不置信;請你從別處證明。而我卻要從摩尼的著作本身,向你證明摩尼說了謊、摩尼褻瀆了。斐利克斯說:把那些書拿出來吧。奧古斯丁說:你們所稱「根基書」的那封摩尼書信就在這裡。除了根基以外,建築物並無別的開端。
Said: Prove it to me through another. Augustine said: What do you wish me to prove to you? Felix said: That Mani lies. Augustine said: Since you cannot prove that Mani speaks the truth, is it necessary that I prove that Mani has lied? Felix said: Why could I not prove it? Were the Scriptures which I asked for brought forth, and did I not prove it? Augustine said: But you ask for the Scriptures of Mani, in which we place no faith; prove it from elsewhere. But I, from that very Scripture of Mani, prove to you that Mani lied and that Mani blasphemed. Felix said: Let the books be brought forth. Augustine said: The epistle of Mani which you call 'of the Foundation' is here present. There is no beginning in a building except the foundation.
22:47
si eum ostendero in ipso fundamento ruinam fecisse, ceteram eius constructionem ut quid quaerimus? FEL. dixit: Hoc dicis in ipsam ostendens ruinam esse . et ego dico, da arbitros, quantos et tu habes, et tibi probo, quia non mentitur. AUG. dixit: Absit a nobis et a genere humano, ut quantos hic uides, tantos uideas Manichaeos. FEL. dixit : Da, dixi, quae a te petiui. AUG. dixit: Quos uis ergo, ut dem tibi ? FEL. dixit: Quos tu uolueris. AUG. dixit: Ego istos do; si habes meliores, pete. FEL. dixit: Quomodo istos das? AUG. dixit: Praesentes, qui nos audiunt. FEL. dixit: Isti mihi non fauent. AUG. dixit: Ergo tu tales quaeris, qui tibi faueant, non qui ueritati ? FEL dixit:
我若證明它在根基本身上已造成傾覆,何必再探究它其餘的建構呢?斐利斯說:你這樣說,是指出傾覆在根基本身裡;但我說,請提供仲裁人,你所有的有多少就提供多少,我便向你證明他並沒有說謊。奧古斯丁說:願我們並全人類都遠離這事,就是你在此看見多少人,就以為看見那麼多摩尼教徒。斐利斯說:我說,請提供我向你所求的。奧古斯丁說:那麼你要我給你哪些人呢?斐利斯說:你所願意的那些人。奧古斯丁說:我就給這些人;你若有更好的,便求吧。斐利斯說:你如何給這些人?奧古斯丁說:就是在場聆聽我們的這些人。斐利斯說:這些人不偏袒我。奧古斯丁說:那麼你所尋找的,是偏袒你的人,而不是偏袒真理的人嗎?斐利斯說:
If I show that it made its ruin in the very foundation, why do we investigate the rest of its structure? FELIX said: You say this pointing out that the ruin is in the foundation itself; but I say, provide arbiters, as many as you too have, and I will prove to you that he does not lie. AUGUSTINE said: Far be it from us and from the human race that you should see as many Manichaeans as you see here. FELIX said: Provide, I said, what I asked of you. AUGUSTINE said: Whom then do you wish me to give you? FELIX said: Whomever you shall wish. AUGUSTINE said: I give these; if you have better ones, ask for them. FELIX said: How do you give these? AUGUSTINE said: Those present, who are listening to us. FELIX said: These do not favour me. AUGUSTINE said: So then you seek such men as favour you, not such as favour the truth? FELIX said:
22:48
Qui me audiant et non tantum me, sed et ipsam scripturam, ut probetur, an uerum dicit, an mentitur. AUG. dixit: Uides ergo, quia audiunt. legamus cetera, quia tu istam epistulam Manichaei esse confessus es. FEL. dixit: Non nego. AUG. dixit: Ergo legatur. FEL. dixit: Arbitros non habeo. et adiecit: legatur caput ipsius. et cum legeretur et uentum esset ad locum, ubi scriptum habet eadem epistula: pax uobis inuisibilis et ueritatis notitia sit cum fratribus suis et carissimis, qui mandatis caelestibus credunt pariter atque deseruiunt; sed et dextera luminis tueatur et eripiat uos ab omni incursione maligna et a laqueo mundi;
就是那些將聽我的人,且不只聽我,也要聽聖經本身,好使人得以查驗他所說的是真是假。奧古斯丁說:那麼你看見他們正在聆聽。讓我們讀其餘的部分,因為你已承認這封信是摩尼所寫。斐利斯說:我不否認。奧古斯丁說:那麼就讓它被誦讀。斐利斯說:我沒有仲裁人。他又說:讓其開頭被誦讀。當人誦讀,讀到那封信寫著的地方:「願不可見的平安歸於你們,願真理的知識與他的弟兄和至親同在,他們同樣相信天上的誡命並服事它們;願光明的右手護衛你們,救你們脫離一切惡毒的侵襲和世界的網羅;」
Men who will hear me, and not only me, but also the Scripture itself, so that it may be tested whether he speaks the truth or lies. AUGUSTINE said: You see then that they are listening. Let us read the rest, since you have confessed that this letter is Manichaeus's. FELIX said: I do not deny it. AUGUSTINE said: Then let it be read. FELIX said: I have no arbiters. And he added: Let its heading be read. And when it was being read and they had come to the place where the same letter has written: "Peace to you, invisible peace, and may the knowledge of the truth be with his brethren and dearly beloved, who believe alike in the heavenly commandments and serve them; but also may the right hand of the light guard you and snatch you from every malignant assault and from the snare of the world;"
22:49
pietas uero spiritus sancti intima pectoris uestri adaperiat, ut ipsis oculis uideatis uestras animas, Felix dixit: Da scripturam, quae ista redarguat. .AUG. dixit: Adhuc nihil mali audiuimus, nisi quod ausus est Manichaeus apostolum se Christi nominare. nam ea, quae dixit, adhuc ad tectorium fallaciae pertinent et ad ouinam pellem, quibus eis prius dicit uerba bona, ut possit introducere mala. sed quid uelit introducere per haec uerba, uideamus. si enim aliquid mali introduxerit, et ista uerba mala erunt et seductoria; si autem aliquid boni in posterioribus et ueri dixerit, necessitate conprehendemus. permitte ergo legantur sequentia. FEL. dixit:
願聖靈的虔敬打開你們胸中最深處,使你們親眼看見自己的靈魂」——斐利斯說:請給我一段駁斥這些話的聖經。奧古斯丁說:迄今我們尚未聽見任何惡的,除了摩尼膽敢自稱為基督的使徒之外。因為他所說的話仍屬於欺騙的粉飾,屬於羊皮外衣,藉此他先向人說善言,好能引進惡事。但讓我們看他要藉這些話引進什麼。因為他若引進某惡事,那麼那些話也是惡的、誘惑人的;但他若在後文說出某善且真的事,我們就必被迫承認。所以請准許誦讀下文。斐利斯說:
and may the piety of the Holy Spirit open the innermost recesses of your breast, that with your very eyes you may see your own souls" — Felix said: Give me a Scripture that refutes these things. AUGUSTINE said: As yet we have heard nothing evil, except that Manichaeus dared to call himself an apostle of Christ. For the things he said still pertain to the plaster of deceit and to the sheep's skin, whereby he first speaks good words to men, that he may be able to introduce evil ones. But let us see what he wishes to introduce through these words. For if he introduces something evil, then those words too will be evil and seductive; but if in what follows he says something good and true, we shall be compelled by necessity. Permit therefore the following to be read. FELIX said:
22:50
Si ergo adseris, quia in primo bona ponuntur et postea mala inmittuntur, quomodo ego tibi possum credere, cum mihi primo bona dixeris? AUG. dixit: Ego adhuc ista nec bona dixi nec mala. nihil mali adhuc audiuimus, dixi; non dixi: iam aliquid boni audiuimus. malum enim illud solum dixi, quod ausus est dicere se apostolum Christi. uerba uero, quae dixit in consequentibus, tunc erunt mala, si mali aliquid introduxerint; tunc erunt bona, si boni aliquid introduxerint. permitte ergo, ut sequentia legantur . quare times? FEL. dixit: Non timeo. AUG. dixit: Permitte ergo, ut legantur. FEL. dixit: Legantur. Et cum legeretur et uentum esset ad locum, ubi scriptum habet:
那麼你若斷言善的先擺在前面、惡的隨後才被暗中引進,那麼你既先向我說了善言,我怎能相信你呢?奧古斯丁說:我迄今尚未稱那些話為善或為惡。我說我們迄今尚未聽見任何惡;我並沒有說:我們已經聽見某善事。因為我所提及唯一的惡,就是他膽敢自稱為基督的使徒。至於他在後文所說的話,若引進某惡,便是惡的;若引進某善,便是善的。所以請准許誦讀下文。你為何害怕?斐利斯說:我不害怕。奧古斯丁說:那麼請准許誦讀它們。斐利斯說:讓它們被誦讀。當人誦讀,讀到那寫著的地方:
If then you assert that good things are placed first and evil things are afterwards insinuated, how can I believe you, when you have first spoken good things to me? AUGUSTINE said: I have as yet called those things neither good nor evil. I said we have as yet heard nothing evil; I did not say: we have already heard something good. For the only evil thing I mentioned was that he dared to say he was an apostle of Christ. But the words he spoke in what follows will then be evil, if they introduce something evil; they will then be good, if they introduce something good. Permit therefore that the following be read. Why are you afraid? FELIX said: I am not afraid. AUGUSTINE said: Permit therefore that they be read. FELIX said: Let them be read. And when it was being read and they had come to the place where it has written:
22:51
ita autem fundata sunt eiusdem splendidissima regna super lucidam et beatam terram, ut a nullo umquam aut moueri aut concuti possint, Augustinus dixit: Terram istam quam dicit, unde habebat? fecit eam, an genuit eam, an aequalis et coaeterna illi erat? istam dico terram, lucidam et beatam quam dicit. FEL. dixit: Quomodo scriptum est: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram et terra erat inuisibilis et coinquinabilis et incomposita. ego ita intellego: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram et terra erat, quasi duae terrae mihi uidentur esse, secundum quod Manichaeus dicit duo regna. AUG. dixit:
「同樣,那一位最輝煌的諸國度乃奠基於那光明而蒙福的地上,以致無人任何時候能使它們移動或動搖」——奧古斯丁說:他所說的這地,是從何而來?是他造的,還是他生的,還是與他同等且同永恆的?我所指的是他所說那光明而蒙福的地。斐利斯說:正如所記:「起初神造天地,地是不可見的、被玷污的、無形的。」我如此理解:「起初神造天地,地是」——在我看來彷彿有兩個地,正如摩尼所說有兩個國度。奧古斯丁說:
"And so the most splendid realms of the same one were founded upon the shining and blessed earth, so that they can never be moved or shaken by anyone" — Augustine said: This earth of which he speaks, whence did he have it? Did he make it, or beget it, or was it equal and coeternal with him? I mean this earth, the shining and blessed one of which he speaks. FELIX said: As it is written: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth, and the earth was invisible and defiled and unformed." I understand it thus: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth, and the earth was" — there seem to me to be, as it were, two earths, according to what Manichaeus says of two kingdoms. AUGUSTINE said:
22:52
Quia scripturam commemorasti nostram, quam soletis blasphemare, ad me pertinet exponere illam et ostendere tibi sine blasphemia esse illud scriptum et cum ueritate et non secundum Manichaeum, ut deinde tu uel in secundis mihi respondeas, quod interrogaui. FEL. dixit: Respondeo. AUG. dixit: Quod scriptum est: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, breuiter conplexa est scriptum, quid fecerit deus. deinde quia nondum adparebat haec terra, quam fecerat, antequam eam distingueret et ornaret, qualem terram "fecerat deus, secuta scriptura exposuit, qualis terra erat, de qua dixerat: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram; tamquam, cum audissemus:
你既引用了我們的聖經,就是你們慣於褻瀆的,那闡釋它、並向你證明所記載的乃無褻瀆、合乎真理、且非照摩尼所言的,便是我的職責,好使你至少在其次能回答我所問的。斐利斯說:我回答。奧古斯丁說:所記載的「起初神造天地」,聖經簡要地包括了神所造的。然後,因為神所造的這地,在他區分並裝飾它之前尚未顯現,神造了何等的地,隨後的聖經便闡明那地是何等模樣,就是它先前所說「起初神造天地」的那地;彷彿當我們聽見:
Since you have cited our Scripture, which you are wont to blaspheme, it belongs to me to expound it and to show you that what is written is without blasphemy and in accord with truth, and not according to Manichaeus, so that then, at least in the second place, you may answer me what I asked. FELIX said: I answer. AUGUSTINE said: What is written, "In the beginning God made heaven and earth," the Scripture briefly comprehended what God had made. Then, because this earth which he had made did not yet appear before he distinguished and adorned it, of what sort of earth God had made, the following Scripture set forth what the earth was like, concerning which it had said: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth"; as though, when we had heard:
22:53
in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, quaereremus, qualem terram, subiecit et ait: terra autem, id est illa, quam fecerat deus, inuisibilis erat et incomposita. non ergo duas terras dixit, sed qualis illa fuerit exposuit. tu itaque responde nunc mihi, quod breuiter interrogaui: terra ista lucida et beata, quam dicit Manichaeus, supra quam fundata erant regna dei, ab ipso deo facta erat, an genita de illo erat, an coaeterna illi erat ? unum de tribus, nisi molestum est, sine tergiuersatione responde. FEL.. dixit : Ipsa se scriptura interpretatur. AUG. dixit:
「起初神造天地」,我們便該問,是何等的地?——它接著說:「但地」,即神所造的那地,「是不可見的、無形的。」所以它並非說有兩個地,而是闡明那地是何等模樣。因此現在請你回答我所簡要問的:摩尼所說那光明而蒙福的地,就是神諸國度奠基其上的,究竟是神自己所造的,還是從他所生的,還是與他同永恆的?三者取其一,若不覺為難,請無所推諉地回答。斐利斯說:聖經本身自作解釋。奧古斯丁說:
"In the beginning God made heaven and earth," we should ask, what sort of earth? — it subjoined and said: "But the earth," that is, that which God had made, "was invisible and unformed." It did not therefore speak of two earths, but set forth of what sort that one was. You therefore now answer me what I briefly asked: this shining and blessed earth of which Manichaeus speaks, upon which the realms of God were founded, was it made by God himself, or was it begotten of him, or was it coeternal with him? One of the three, if it is not troublesome, answer without evasion. FELIX said: The Scripture itself interprets itself. AUGUSTINE said:
22:54
Si ergo nosti esse hic aliquem locum, ubi hoc dicat scriptura, quia illam terram uel genuit deus uel fecit uel coaeterna illi erat, aperi ad locum, quem nosti, et lege mihi.- FEL. dixit: Non est in ista scriptura, sed in altera. AUG. dixit: Credo ergo, quia, si qua est illa scriptura, meministi, quid ibi dixerit. itaque tu mihi responde, qui nosti illam scripturam; et si dixero, quia non sic habet, conuinces me. si autem sic cognouero, secundum hoc disputo, quod tu ipse responderis,. dic ergo, an fecerit terram istam deus, an genuerit, an coaeterna illi fuerit, qui legisti in nescio quo libro, ubi esse hoc scriptum dicis. FEL. dixit:
那麼你若知道此處有某段經文,聖經在其中說神生了那地,或造了那地,或那地與他同永恆,就請翻到你所知道的地方,讀給我聽。斐利斯說:不在這段聖經裡,而在另一段。奧古斯丁說:那麼我相信,若真有那段聖經,你記得它在那裡所說的。因此請你——你既知道那段聖經——回答我;我若說它並非如此記載,你便可駁倒我。但我若認出確是如此,我便按你自己所回答的來論辯。所以請說,神是造了這地,還是生了它,還是它與他同永恆——你既在某本我不知道的書中讀過,你說那裡如此記載。斐利斯說:
If then you know there is here some place where Scripture says this, that God either begot that earth or made it or that it was coeternal with him, open to the place you know and read it to me. FELIX said: It is not in this Scripture, but in another. AUGUSTINE said: I believe then that, if there is any such Scripture, you remember what it said there. So then you answer me, you who know that Scripture; and if I say that it does not read so, you will convict me. But if I recognize that it is so, I argue according to that which you yourself have answered. Say therefore whether God made this earth, or begot it, or it was coeternal with him — you who have read in I know not what book where you say this is written. FELIX said:
22:55
Quia modo sanctitas tua interpretata est scripturam tuam, quomodo uoluisti et acceptaui, et tu sic mihi . accepta, quicquid dixero. AUG. dixit: Interim quod interrogaui, si nihil me contra mouerit, accepto; si autem aliquid mouerit, motum meum indico tibi, ut ad ipsum respondeas. FEL. dixit: Ego non respondi ad tua dicta.- AUG. dixit: Quia prius est, ut mihi ad id, quod interrogaui, respondeas, tamen feci etiam, ut tibi prior respondeam . forte non te mouit; ideo non respondisti . forte et me non mouebit, cum responderis. responde ergo ad quod interrogaui. FEL. dixit: Respondeo. et adiecit:
既然方才你的聖德已照你所願闡釋了你自己的聖經,而我接受了,你也照樣為我這樣做:接受我所要說的一切。奧古斯丁說:與此同時,關於我所問的,若沒有什麼使我起疑,我便接受;但若有什麼使我起疑,我便向你陳明我的疑難,好使你能回答它。斐利斯說:我尚未回答你的陳述。奧古斯丁說:因為首要的乃是你當就我所問的回答我,然而我甚至已安排要先回答你。或許它並未使你起疑,所以你沒有回答。或許當你回答後,它也不會使我起疑。所以請回答我所問的。斐利斯說:我回答。他又說:
Since just now your Holiness has interpreted your own Scripture as you wished, and I accepted it, so you too do the same for me: accept whatever I shall say. AUGUSTINE said: Meanwhile, as to what I asked, if nothing moves me against it, I accept; but if something moves me, I shall declare my difficulty to you, so that you may answer it. FELIX said: I have not answered your statements. AUGUSTINE said: Because the prior thing is that you should answer me as to what I asked, nevertheless I have arranged even to answer you first. Perhaps it did not move you; therefore you did not answer. Perhaps it will not move me either, when you have answered. Answer therefore what I asked. FELIX said: I answer. And he added:
22:56
dixisti ergo de terra illa, in qua deus habetur, an facta est ab illo, an generauit illam, an coaeterna illi est. et ego dico, quia, quomodo deus aeternus est et factura apud illum nulla est, totum aeternum est.. AUG. dixit: Non illam ergo genuit neque fecit? FEL. dixit: Non, sed est illi coaeterna. AUG. dixit: Si autem genuisset illam, non illi esset coaeterna. FEL. dixit: Quod nascitur, finem habet; quod innatum est, non habet finem. AUG. dixit: Quibus ergo erat ille pater aut cuius erat pater, , quem modo patrem nominauit? si enim nihil genuerat, pater esse non poterat. FEL. dixit: Sed sunt alia, quae generauit. AUG. dixit:
那麼你問及那地——就是神所在的地——究竟是他所造的,還是他生了它,還是它與他同永恆。我說,正如神是永恆的,且在他那裡並無任何被造之物,全體都是永恆的。奧古斯丁說:那麼他既沒有生它,也沒有造它?斐利斯說:沒有,但它與他同永恆。奧古斯丁說:然而他若曾生了它,它便不會與他同永恆。斐利斯說:凡受生的都有終結;凡非受生的都沒有終結。奧古斯丁說:那麼他是誰的父,或作誰的父,就是你方才稱為父的那位?因為他若什麼都沒有生,便不能是父。斐利斯說:但另有些是他所生的。奧古斯丁說:
You have therefore asked concerning that earth in which God is held, whether it was made by him, or he begot it, or it is coeternal with him. And I say that, just as God is eternal and there is with him nothing made, the whole is eternal. AUGUSTINE said: He neither begot it then nor made it? FELIX said: No, but it is coeternal with him. AUGUSTINE said: But if he had begotten it, it would not be coeternal with him. FELIX said: What is born has an end; what is unborn has no end. AUGUSTINE said: Of whom then was he the father, or whose father was he, whom just now you named father? For if he had begotten nothing, he could not be a father. FELIX said: But there are other things which he begot. AUGUSTINE said:
22:57
Illa ergo, quae generauit, non sunt illi coaeterna, an et ipsa coaeterna sunt? FEL. dixit: Coaeterna sunt illi quicquid deus generauit. AUG. dixit: Ergo errasti, quod superius dixisti: omne quod nascitur, finem habet. FEL. dixit: Interim, quia secundum generationem carnis locutus sum, erraui. AUG. dixit: Modestissime confessus errorem merearis intellegere ueritatem. FEL. dixit: Faciat deus. AUG. dixit: Adtende ergo iam, ut incipias cognoscere errorem scripturae huius. si quae genuit deus, coaeterna non sunt illi, melior est terra illa, quam non generauit deus, ubi habitant omnia, quae generauit deus; quam terram dicis ab eo non generatam. FEL. dixit:
那麼他所生的那些,是否與他同永恆,還是它們也是同永恆的?斐利斯說:凡神所生的都與他同永恆。奧古斯丁說:那麼你先前所說的便錯了:凡受生的都有終結。斐利斯說:目前而言,我錯了,因為我是按肉體的生育而說的。奧古斯丁說:你既如此謙遜地承認錯誤,願你配得明白真理。斐利斯說:願神成全。奧古斯丁說:那麼現在請留意,好使你開始認出這段經文的錯誤。神所生的那些,若不與他同永恆,那麼那神未曾生的地便更為優越,一切神所生的都住在那裡——你說那地並非他所生的。斐利斯說:
Those things then which he begot, are they not coeternal with him, or are they too coeternal? FELIX said: Whatever God begot is coeternal with him. AUGUSTINE said: Then you erred in what you said above: everything that is born has an end. FELIX said: For the moment, I erred, because I spoke according to the generation of the flesh. AUGUSTINE said: Confessing your error most modestly, may you deserve to understand the truth. FELIX said: May God grant it. AUGUSTINE said: Attend then now, that you may begin to recognize the error of this Scripture. If the things which God begot are not coeternal with him, then that earth is better, which God did not beget, where dwell all the things which God begot — which earth you say was not begotten by him. FELIX said:
22:58
Coaequantur sibi omnia, et quae generauit et quae non generauit, id est terra illa, ubi commorabatur. AUG. dixit: Quid? ipse qui generauit, aequalis est illis omnibus aut maior est illis ? FEL dixit: Et qui generauit et quos generauit et ubi positi sunt, omnia aequalia sunt. AUG. dixit: Unius ergo substantiae sunt? FEL. dixit: Unius. AUG. dixit: Hoc quod est deus pater, hoc sunt filii ipsius, hoc et terra illa? FEL dixit: Hoc unum sunt omnes. AUG. dixit: Huius ergo terrae non est pater, sed habitator ? FEL. dixit: Etiam. AUG. dixit: Si nec genuit illam nec fecit illam, quomodo ad eum pertineat nisi sola uicinitate, non uideo, quomodo si habeat aliquis uicinum bonum;
萬物彼此相等,無論是他所生的,還是他未生的,即他所居住那地。奧古斯丁說:怎麼?那生育者本身,是與那一切相等,還是大於它們?斐利斯說:那生育者、他所生的、以及它們所安置之處——全都相等。奧古斯丁說:那麼它們是同一本質嗎?斐利斯說:同一本質。奧古斯丁說:神父是什麼,他的眾子便是什麼,那地也是什麼嗎?斐利斯說:這一切都是同一。奧古斯丁說:那麼他不是這地的父,而是居住者嗎?斐利斯說:正是。奧古斯丁說:他若既沒有生它、也沒有造它,那麼它除藉單純的毗鄰之外如何與他有關,我便看不出——就如有人有一位善鄰;
All things are equated to one another, both those he begot and those he did not beget, that is, that earth where he dwelt. AUGUSTINE said: What? Is he himself who begot equal to all those things, or greater than they? FELIX said: Both he who begot and those whom he begot and where they are placed — all are equal. AUGUSTINE said: They are then of one substance? FELIX said: Of one. AUGUSTINE said: What God the Father is, this his sons are, this that earth also is? FELIX said: These are all one. AUGUSTINE said: Of this earth then he is not the father, but the inhabitant? FELIX said: Even so. AUGUSTINE said: If he neither begot it nor made it, how it pertains to him except by mere neighbourhood I do not see — as if one has a good neighbour;
22:59
et duae iam erunt res ambae ingenitae: terra et pater. .FEL. dixit: Immo tres sunt: pater ingenitus, terra ingenita et aer ingenitus.\'. AUG. dixit: Hoc totum una substantia est? FEL. dixit: Una. AUG. dixit: Et ita fundata, ut a nullo umquam moueri aut concuti possit? FEL. dixit: Motio et concussio habet distantiam. AUG. dixit: Habeat; sed tamen talia fuerunt, ut a nullo umquam moueri aut concuti possent ? FEL. dixit: Est distantia inter moueri et concuti. AUG. dixit: Non inde te interrogo. FEL. dixit: Sed inde me uis tenere. AUG. dixit: Quomodo uis, accipe "moueri* non poterat moueri ? FEL dixit: Non dico, quia non poterat moueri, sed motio distantia est. AUG. dixit: Sed ita dixi:
那麼便有兩樣都是非受生的:地和父。斐利斯說:不,反倒有三樣:非受生的父、非受生的地、非受生的氣。奧古斯丁說:這全體是同一本質嗎?斐利斯說:同一。奧古斯丁說:且如此奠定,以致無人任何時候能使它移動或動搖?斐利斯說:移動與動搖有差別。奧古斯丁說:就算有差別;但它們是否終究是這樣,以致無人任何時候能使它們移動或動搖?斐利斯說:被移動與被動搖之間有差別。奧古斯丁說:我不是在問你那個。斐利斯說:但你正是要從那方面來抓住我。奧古斯丁說:你隨你所願理解——「它不能被移動」;它能被移動嗎?斐利斯說:我並不是說它不能被移動,而是說移動乃是一種差別。奧古斯丁說:但我是這樣說的:
and there will then be two things both unbegotten: the earth and the father. FELIX said: Nay rather, there are three: the unbegotten father, the unbegotten earth, and the unbegotten air. AUGUSTINE said: Is this whole one substance? FELIX said: One. AUGUSTINE said: And so founded that it can never be moved or shaken by anyone? FELIX said: Motion and shaking have a difference. AUGUSTINE said: Let them have it; but nevertheless were they such that they could never be moved or shaken by anyone? FELIX said: There is a difference between being moved and being shaken. AUGUSTINE said: I do not ask you about that. FELIX said: But it is from that side that you wish to hold me. AUGUSTINE said: Take it however you wish — "it could not be moved"; could it be moved? FELIX said: I do not say that it could not be moved, but motion is a difference. AUGUSTINE said: But I said thus:
22:60
nec moueri nec concuti; non dixi: moueri quidem potest, sed concuti non potest, aut: concuti quidem potest, sed moueri non potest. sed ambas res dixi: non posse nec moueri nec concuti. FEL. dixit: De ambabus rebus distantia est inter moueri et concuti. AU6. dixit: Legamus ergo sequentia, uideamus, si deus iste, qui fundata habebat regna super lucidam et beatam terram, quae a nullo umquam moueri et concuti possunt, neminem timuit, sicut oportebat, ut neminem timeret, cuius regna sic fundata erant, ut a nullo aut moueri aut concuti possent. et legit sequentia: iuxta uero unam partem ac latus inlustris illius ac sanctae terrae. et cum legeret, interrogauit: quod latus? dextrum aut sinistrum?
既不被移動也不被動搖;我並沒有說:它固然能被移動,卻不能被動搖,或:它固然能被動搖,卻不能被移動。而我是說這兩樣:它們既不能被移動也不能被動搖。斐利斯說:關於這兩樣,被移動與被動搖之間有差別。奧古斯丁說:那麼讓我們讀下文;讓我們看那位神——就是把他的諸國度奠基於光明而蒙福之地、無人任何時候能使之移動或動搖的——是否如所當然的那樣不懼怕任何人,以致他既然國度如此奠定、無人能使之移動或動搖,就不懼怕任何人。他便誦讀下文:「而在那輝煌神聖之地的一部分與一側旁邊。」當他讀時,便問:哪一側?右邊還是左邊?
neither moved nor shaken; I did not say: it can indeed be moved, but cannot be shaken, or: it can indeed be shaken, but cannot be moved. But I spoke of both things: that they can neither be moved nor shaken. FELIX said: Concerning both things there is a difference between being moved and being shaken. AUGUSTINE said: Let us then read what follows; let us see whether that god, who had his realms founded upon the shining and blessed earth, which can never be moved or shaken by anyone, feared no one, as befitted, so that he feared no one whose realms were so founded that they could be neither moved nor shaken by anyone. And he read what followed: "But beside one part and side of that illustrious and holy earth." And when he read it, he asked: What side? The right or the left?
22:61
FEL. dixit: Hanc tibi ego non possum interpretari scripturam et exponere, quod ibi non est; ipsa sibi interpres est. ego non possum dicere, ne forte incurram in peccatum. AUG. dixit: Legatur ergo, quod sequitur. et cum legeret et uentum esset ad locum,. ubi habet: lucis uero beatissimae pater sciens labem magnam ac uastitatem, quae ex tenebris surgeret, aduersus sua sancta inpendere saecula, nisi quod eximium ac praeclarum et uirtute potens numen obponat, quo superet simul ac destruat stirpem tenebrarum, qua extincta perpetua quies lucis incolis pararetur, Augustinus dixit:
斐利斯說:這段聖經我不能為你闡釋、解說那並不在其中的東西;它是它自己的解釋者。我不能說,免得或許陷入罪中。奧古斯丁說:那麼讓下文被誦讀。當他讀到那有著這話的地方:「但那至福之光的父,知道從黑暗中將興起、且懸在他神聖世代之上的大傾覆與荒毀,除非他擺出某位卓越、輝煌、大有能力的神明來抵擋它,藉此他得以同時制勝並毀滅黑暗的族類,這族類一旦被撲滅,光明的居民便可得永遠的安息,」奧古斯丁說:
FELIX said: This Scripture I cannot interpret and expound to you, for what is not there; it is its own interpreter. I cannot say, lest perhaps I fall into sin. AUGUSTINE said: Then let what follows be read. And when he read it and had come to the place where it has: "But the father of the most blessed light, knowing the great ruin and devastation which would rise up from the darkness and was hanging over his holy realms, unless he should set against it some excellent and illustrious deity, mighty in power, whereby he might at once overcome and destroy the stock of the darkness, which being extinguished, perpetual rest might be prepared for the inhabitants of the light," Augustine said:
22:62
Nunc iam quia coeperunt apertae blasphemiae, si defendendas putas, dic, quid ista gens tenebrarum, quam uidetur deus timuisse, ne magna labes et uastitas ex tenebris in regna eius inruerent, nocere poterat deo; maxime cuius regna superius dixit ita fundata, ut a nullo umquam moueri aut concuti possent. quid ergo illi factura erat gens ista? poterat ei nocere, an non poterat? responde unum de duobus. FEL. dixit: Et ego respondeo: si nihil contra deum est, secundum quod dixit scriptura Manichaei, quia est alterum regnum, pro qua causa Christus missus est, ut nos liberaret de laqueo mortis huius? cuius est iste laqueus et mors? si aduersarius nullus contra deum est, ut quid baptizati sumus ?
那麼現在,既然公開的褻瀆已經開始,你若認為它們應當被辯護,就請說:這黑暗的族類——就是神彷彿曾懼怕、唯恐從黑暗來的大傾覆與荒毀衝入他國度的——能對神造成什麼傷害;尤其他先前說他的國度如此奠定,以致無人任何時候能使之移動或動搖。那麼這族類要對他做什麼?它能傷害他,還是不能?請就二者取其一回答。斐利斯說:我也回答:若照摩尼的經文所說——有另一個國度——並無任何敵對神的,那麼基督為何緣故被差來,好救我們脫離這死亡的網羅?這網羅和死亡是誰的?若沒有任何敵對神的仇敵,那麼我們為何受了洗?
Now then, since open blasphemies have begun, if you think they should be defended, say what this race of darkness — which God seems to have feared, lest a great ruin and devastation from the darkness should burst into his realms — could do to harm God; especially since he said above that his realms were so founded that they could never be moved or shaken by anyone. What then was this race going to do to him? Could it harm him, or could it not? Answer one of the two. FELIX said: And I answer: if there is nothing against God, according to what the Scripture of Manichaeus said — that there is another kingdom — for what cause was Christ sent, to free us from the snare of this death? Whose is this snare and death? If there is no adversary against God, why have we been baptized?
22:63
ut quid eucharistia, ut quid christianitas, si contra deum nihil est? AUG. dixit: Quia uideo te nolle respondere, quod te interrogo, et te interrogare, ut tibi respondeam, et hoc non recuso, dum tamen memineris, quia tibi interroganti ego respondeo, tu autem mihi interroganti respondere noluisti. sed quia me interrogasti, audi, quod interrogasti. nos quidem dicimus liberatorem Christum uenisse et a peccatis nostris dicimus nos liberari, quia nos non sumus de substantia dei geniti, sed per eius uerbum facti a deo. multum autem interest inter natum de substantia dei et factum a deo, quod non est de substantia dei. quicquid ergo fecit deus, potest esse mutabile;
若沒有任何敵對神的,那麼為何有聖體,為何有基督信仰?奧古斯丁說:既然我看見你不願回答我所問的,卻反問我好使我回答你——而這我並不拒絕,只要你記得:你發問時我回答你,而我發問時你卻拒絕回答我——但既然你問了我,就請聽你所問的。我們確實說,基督救主已經來到,且我們說我們得脫離自己的罪,因為我們並非從神的本質所生,而是神藉他的道所造。從神的本質所生的,與被神所造而非出於神本質的,兩者之間有極大的差別。所以凡神所造的都可以是可變的;
Why the Eucharist, why Christianity, if there is nothing against God? AUGUSTINE said: Since I see that you are unwilling to answer what I ask you, and that you question me so that I may answer you — and this I do not refuse, provided you remember that I answer you when you question, whereas you have refused to answer me when I question — but since you have questioned me, hear what you have asked. We indeed say that Christ the Liberator has come, and we say that we are freed from our sins, because we are not begotten of the substance of God, but made by God through his Word. Now there is a great difference between what is born of the substance of God and what is made by God, which is not of the substance of God. Whatever therefore God has made can be mutable;
22:64
ipse autem deus non est mutabilis, quia non possunt aequari opera artifici et conditori. tu autem, qui paulo ante ad interrogationem meam dixisti, quia et pater, qui generauit ibi lucis filios, et aer et ipsa terra et ipsi filii una substantia sunt et aequalia sunt omnia, oportet, ut dicas mihi, huic substantiae utique incorruptibili quomodo poterat nocere gens tenebrarum. si enim poterat nocere ei, non erat natura incorruptibilis; si autem non poterat, nulla causa erat, quare proelium agitaret et illud numen, quod dicit, huc mitteret. FEL. dixit: Dilationem peto, ut possim respondere. AUG. dixit: Quando? cras intermissus sufficit? FEL. dixit:
但神自己卻不是可變的,因為作品不能與工匠、創造者相等。但你——你方才回答我的問題時說,那位在那裡生了光明之子的父、氣、地本身、以及那些子本身,都是同一本質、且全都相等——你就當告訴我,黑暗的族類如何能傷害這確乎不朽壞的本質。因為它若能傷害它,那便不是不朽壞的本性;但它若不能,那麼並無緣由使它發動戰爭、並差遣他所說的那位神明到這裡來。斐利斯說:我請求延期,好使我能回答。奧古斯丁說:何時?明天的間隔夠嗎?斐利斯說:
but God himself is not mutable, because the works cannot be equal to the craftsman and founder. But you, who a little before said in answer to my question that both the father, who begot the sons of the light there, and the air and the earth itself and the sons themselves are of one substance and all are equal — it behoves you to tell me how the race of darkness could harm this substance, which is surely incorruptible. For if it could harm it, it was not an incorruptible nature; but if it could not, there was no cause why it should wage battle and send hither that deity of which he speaks. FELIX said: I ask for a postponement, that I may be able to answer. AUGUSTINE said: When? Is tomorrow's interval enough? FELIX said:
22:65
Intermitte mihi tres dies, id est hodie et cras et perindie aut usque ad diem, qui est post dominicum, id est pridie idus Decembris. AUG. dixit : Uideo te dilationem ad respondendum petisse; humanum est, ut concedatur tibi . sed si respondere non potueris ad praestitutum diem, quid fiet? FEL. dixit: Ero uictus. AUG. dixit: Quid? si fugeris. FEL. dixit: Reus ero ciuitatis huius et ubique et legis meae. AUG. dixit: Immo hoc dic: si fugero, sic habear, tamquam si anathemauero Manichaeum. FEL. dixit: Hoc dicere non possum. AUG. dixit: Ergo aperte nobis dic, quia fugere cogitas et nemo te tenet. FEL. dixit: Non fugio. AUG. dixit: Ut uideo, non uis quasi uictus abscedere; sed saltem hoc dic:
請准我三天,即今日、明日和後日,或直到主日之後那日,即十二月望日的前一日。奧古斯丁說:我看見你為了回答而請求延期;准你所求乃是人之常情。但你若不能在所定的日子回答,該當如何?斐利斯說:我便算敗了。奧古斯丁說:你若逃走呢?斐利斯說:我便對這城、對各處、對我的教法都有罪。奧古斯丁說:不如你這樣說:我若逃走,就當把我看作彷彿咒詛了摩尼一般。斐利斯說:這話我不能說。奧古斯丁說:那麼請向我們公開說出,你正打算逃走,而無人攔你。斐利斯說:我不逃走。奧古斯丁說:依我看,你不願如敗者般離去;但至少請說這話:
Grant me three days, that is, today and tomorrow and the day after, or until the day which is after the Lord's Day, that is, the day before the Ides of December. AUGUSTINE said: I see you have asked for a postponement in order to answer; it is human that it be granted to you. But if you cannot answer by the appointed day, what shall be done? FELIX said: I shall be vanquished. AUGUSTINE said: What if you flee? FELIX said: I shall be guilty toward this city and everywhere and toward my law. AUGUSTINE said: Nay rather, say this: if I flee, let me be regarded as though I had anathematized Manichaeus. FELIX said: This I cannot say. AUGUSTINE said: Then say to us openly that you are thinking of fleeing and no one holds you. FELIX said: I do not flee. AUGUSTINE said: As I see, you do not wish to depart as though vanquished; but at least say this:
22:66
si fugero. uictus sum. FEL. dixit: Dixi. AUG. dixit: Et unde adparebit te fugisse propter gesta? FEL. dixit: lube, ut quem elegero, cum ipso sim. AUG. dixit: Elige tibi aliquem de praesentibus istis fratribus, qui ad cancellum stant. ,FEL. dixit: Sed cum illo, qui est in medio. AUG. dixit: Sicut tibi elegisti, usque ad diem cam illo eris. FEL. dixit: Etiam; et ego hoc consentio. BONIFACIUS dixit: Praestabit Christus, ut si cum illo ueniam, christianus est. Augustinus episcopus ecclesiae catholicae Hipponeregiensium his in ecclesia coram populo gestis subscripsi. Felix christianus, cultor legis Manichaei, his in ecclesia coram populo gestis subscripsi. LIBER SECUNDUS.
我若逃走,便算敗了。斐利斯說:我說了。奧古斯丁說:那麼從何看出你是因這訴訟記錄而逃走的?斐利斯說:請下令使我可以與我所選的人同在。奧古斯丁說:請從站在欄杆旁在場的這些弟兄中,為你自己選一人。斐利斯說:但要與那位在中間的。奧古斯丁說:正如你為自己所選的,你要與他同在直到那日。斐利斯說:正是;我對此同意。波尼法修說:基督必成全這事,就是若我與他同來,他便是基督徒。我,奧古斯丁,希波雷吉烏斯大公教會的主教,在教會中於眾民面前,於這些所行的記錄上署名。我,斐利斯,一個基督徒,摩尼教法的信奉者,在教會中於眾民面前,於這些所行的記錄上署名。第二卷。
if I flee, I am vanquished. FELIX said: I have said it. AUGUSTINE said: And whence will it appear that you fled on account of the proceedings? FELIX said: Command that I may be with whomever I shall choose. AUGUSTINE said: Choose for yourself someone from these brethren here present who stand at the railing. FELIX said: But with him who is in the middle. AUGUSTINE said: As you have chosen for yourself, you shall be with him until the day. FELIX said: Even so; and I consent to this. BONIFACE said: Christ will grant that, if I come with him, he is a Christian. I, Augustine, bishop of the Catholic Church of Hippo Regius, have subscribed to these proceedings enacted in the church before the people. I, Felix, a Christian, a worshipper of the law of Manichaeus, have subscribed to these proceedings enacted in the church before the people. BOOK TWO.
22:67
Cum uentum esset ad diem praestitutum, id est ad pridie iduum Decembrium, res sic agi coepit in ecclesia Pacis. AUGUSTINUS episcopus ecclesiae catholicae Hipponiregiensium regionum dixit: Pridem cum sermonem haberemus, di-. lationem te petiisse meministi, cum ad ea, quae interrogaueram in praesenti respondere non posses. si ergo tam lato temporis spatio, post diem scilicet quintum, aliquid excogitasti, responde. hoc enim tunc interrogaueram: si deo nocere nihil poterat, quare bellum gessit cum gente quam dicitis tenebrarum, in quo bello naturae daemonum misceret substantiam suam, quae hoc est, quod ipse, sicut iam interrogatus dixisti?
到了所定的日子,即十二月望日的前一日,此事便在平安堂中如此進行。奧古斯丁,希波雷吉烏斯諸地區大公教會的主教,說:我們前些時候進行討論時,你記得你請求延期,因為你當時不能回答我所問的。那麼你若在這麼寬裕的時間內——即第五日之後——想出了什麼,就請回答。因為我當時所問的乃是:若沒有什麼能傷害神,他為何要與你們所稱為黑暗的族類爭戰,在那場戰爭中把他自己的本質——即他自己所是的那本質——與眾魔的本性相混,正如你受問時所說的?
When the appointed day had come, that is, the day before the Ides of December, the matter began to be conducted thus in the Church of Peace. AUGUSTINE, bishop of the Catholic Church of the regions of Hippo Regius, said: When we held our discussion a while ago, you remember that you asked for a postponement, since you could not answer at the moment the things I had asked. If then, in so wide a span of time, namely after the fifth day, you have thought out anything, answer. For this is what I asked then: if nothing could harm God, why did he wage war with the race which you call the race of darkness, in which war he mingled his own substance — which is that which he himself is — with the nature of the demons, as you said when questioned?
22:68
si autem nocere ei poterat, non incorruptibilem deum colitis, qualem ueritas et apostolica doctrina testatur. FELIX dixit: Ei quo a sanctitate tua recessi, ut ad diem constitutum reuersus essem, ut responderem tuae interrogationi, quaecumque uelles interrogare, uentum est ad diem . et quia nullam scripturam inter manus habui, quia non mihi sunt redditae, unde me instruere possem — nullus enim ad certamen exit, nisi prius meditatus fuerit et nullus litigator potest sine suis chartis litigare — similiter et ego sine mea scriptura respondere non possum. AUG. dixit:
但若有什麼能傷害他,你們所敬拜的便不是不朽壞的神,就是真理和使徒教義所證實的那位。斐利斯說:自從我離開你的聖德,好在所定的日子回來、回答你所要問的一切,如今那日已到。但因為我手中沒有任何聖經,既然它們尚未歸還於我,我無從據以裝備自己——因為無人赴戰,除非先經思量;也無訟者能無其文卷而爭訟——照樣我也不能無我的聖經而回答。奧古斯丁說:
But if anything could harm him, you do not worship an incorruptible God, such as truth and apostolic doctrine attest. FELIX said: From the time I departed from your Holiness, that I might return on the appointed day to answer your questioning, whatever you should wish to ask, the day has come. And because I have had no Scripture in my hands, since they have not been restored to me, whence I might instruct myself — for no one goes forth to a contest unless he has first meditated, and no litigant can litigate without his documents — likewise I too cannot answer without my Scripture. AUGUSTINE said:
22:69
Istam tergiuersationem tanto dierum spatio cogitasti, quae te in causa perdita et errore sacrilego quid respondeas non habentem adiuuare nihil poterit. notum est enim omnibus, qui aderant, quos etiam nunc adesse uideo, te dierum tantum dilationem petisse, debuisse autem petere etiam codices, quando dilationem petisti, si his te putabas instrui posse ad respondendum; quod non fecisti. noui te petisse codices non quidem ad instructionem inspiciendos, uerum hoc longe, antequam peteres dilationem; cum uero dilationem petisti, codicum tibi reddendorum et inspiciendorum, ut esse posses instructior, nullam fecisti mentionem. FEL. dixit:
你在這麼多天的漫長時間裡想出的這個推諉之計,卻絲毫不能幫助你,因為在一件敗訴的官司和褻瀆的謬誤中,你無話可答。因為在場眾人——就是我如今看見在場的——都知道,你只請求了延期日子,但你既請求延期,若你以為能藉那些抄本裝備自己來回答,你本也當請求那些抄本——這你卻沒有做。我知道你曾請求那些抄本,卻並非為查閱以裝備自己,而且那遠在你請求延期之前;然而當你請求延期時,你卻絲毫沒有提到要把抄本歸還給你、供你查閱,好使你更充分地裝備。斐利斯說:
This evasion you have devised in so long a span of days, but it will be able to help you not at all, since in a lost cause and a sacrilegious error you have nothing to answer. For it is known to all who were present, whom I see present even now, that you asked only for a postponement of days, but that you ought also to have asked for the codices when you asked for the postponement, if you thought you could be instructed by them to answer — which you did not do. I know that you asked for the codices, not indeed to be inspected for instruction, but this was far before you asked for the postponement; when, however, you asked for the postponement, you made no mention of the codices being restored to you and inspected, that you might be better instructed. FELIX said:
22:70
Modo peto, codices reddantur mihi, et uenio ad certamen post biduum; et si uictus fuero, quod deliberaueris, subeo. AUG. dixit: Rudem te in ista scelerata secta non esse puto, quod et fateris. non te autem habere, quod respondeas, etsi tu non fatearis, omnis homo iam uidet. sed quia codices tuos. repetis, qui sub sigillo publico custodiuntur, quibus inspectis dicis te instructum uenire posse post biduum, illud, quod iam constat, obiectis quaestionibus te respondere non potuisse recole. Tolle autem codices tuos, et dic, quid inde uelis tibi proferri, quod modo inspicias et respondeas. FEL. dixit: Omnes scripturas, quae mihi sublatae sunt.
如今我請求把那些抄本歸還於我,我便在兩天後前來應戰;我若敗了,便甘受你所裁定的一切。奧古斯丁說:我不認為你在這邪惡的教派中是生手,這你也承認。但你無話可答,縱使你不承認,人人都已看見。然而既然你討回你的抄本——就是保存在公家封印之下的——並說查閱後你能在兩天後有備而來,那麼請記住如今已確立的事,即你未能回答向你提出的問題。但你取回你的抄本,且說出你要從其中拿出什麼,好使你如今查閱並回答。斐利斯說:一切從我這裡被取走的聖經。
Now I ask that the codices be restored to me, and I will come to the contest after two days; and if I am vanquished, I shall undergo whatever you shall have decided. AUGUSTINE said: I do not think you a novice in this wicked sect, which you also confess. But that you have nothing to answer, even if you do not confess it, every man already sees. But since you demand back your codices, which are kept under the public seal, and say that, having inspected them, you can come instructed after two days, recall this, which is now established, that you were not able to answer the questions put to you. But take your codices, and say what you wish to be produced from them, that you may now inspect and answer. FELIX said: All the Scriptures which have been taken from me.
22:71
ista enim epistula Fundamenti est, quod et sanctitas tua bene scit, quod et ego dixi, quia ipsa continet initium, medium et finem. ipsa legatur, et quicquid malum obicitur legi meae, probetur . et nego illam, si probata fuerint illa crimina, quae obiciuntur legi meae. AUG. dixit: Quoniam fateris hanc esse epistulam, ubi doctrinae uestrae initium, medium et finis continetur, hoc initium quam sit sacrilegum, ubi deum dicitis pugnasse contra gentem tenebrarum et miscuisse naturae daemonum polluendam et ligandam partem suam, quae hoc est quod ipse, tam sacrilegum est, ut ferri ab audientibus uix possit.
因為這正是《根基書信》,正如你的聖德所深知,也如我所說的,因為它本身包含了開頭、中間和結尾。讓它被誦讀,讓凡指控我教法之惡的都得證實;那些指控我教法的罪名若得證實,我便棄絕它。奧古斯丁說:既然你承認這正是那封含有你們教義開頭、中間、結尾的信,那麼這開頭何等褻瀆——在其中你們說神與黑暗的族類爭戰,並把他自己的一部分——即他自己所是的那部分——與眾魔的本性相混,以致被玷污、被捆綁——如此褻瀆,以致聆聽者幾乎無法忍受。
For this is the Letter of the Foundation, as your Holiness well knows, and as I too have said, since it itself contains the beginning, the middle, and the end. Let it be read, and let whatever evil is charged against my law be proved; and I renounce it, if those crimes which are charged against my law shall have been proved. AUGUSTINE said: Since you confess this to be the letter wherein the beginning, middle, and end of your doctrine is contained, how sacrilegious this beginning is — where you say that God fought against the race of darkness and mingled his own part, which is that which he himself is, with the nature of the demons, to be polluted and bound — is so sacrilegious that it can scarcely be borne by those who hear it.
22:72
hoc obicitur primo sectae uestrae — siue initium hoc uoces, siue medium, siue finem, non ualde id curo; hoc tamen de hac epistula, quam fateris esse Manichaei, lectum esse non negas — hoc uobis obicitur, hoc defende, si potes, ut ad alia ueniamus. unde iterum interrogo: si deum incorruptibilem colitis, quid ei nocere poterat nescio quae gens aduersa, quam fingitis ? si nihil ei nocere poterat, nulla fuit causa, quare partem suam naturae daemonum commisceret; si autem nocere ei poterat,. non deum incorruptibilem colitis. FEL. dixit: Manichaeus dicit duas esse naturas et modo inde culpatur, quia dixit duas esse, bonam et malam. Christus in euangelio duas dicit esse arbores:
這首先被指控加於你們教派——無論你稱這為開頭、還是中間、還是結尾,我並不甚在意;然而你不否認這是從這封信中讀出的,就是你承認為摩尼所寫的——這是指控你們的;你若能,就辯護這一點,好使我們能進到其他事上。因此我再問:你們若敬拜一位不朽壞的神,那麼你所想像的某個敵對族類能傷害他什麼?它若絲毫不能傷害他,那麼並無緣由使他把自己的一部分與眾魔的本性相混;但它若能傷害他,你們所敬拜的便不是不朽壞的神。斐利斯說:摩尼說有兩種本性,如今他就為此受責,因為他說有兩種,一善一惡。基督在福音中說有兩棵樹:
This is charged first against your sect — whether you call this the beginning, or the middle, or the end, I do not much care; yet you do not deny that this was read from this letter, which you confess to be Manichaeus's — this is charged against you; defend this, if you can, that we may come to other matters. Whence I ask again: if you worship an incorruptible God, what could some hostile race, which you imagine, harm him? If it could harm him nothing, there was no cause why he should mingle his own part with the nature of the demons; but if it could harm him, you do not worship an incorruptible God. FELIX said: Manichaeus says there are two natures, and now for that he is blamed, because he said there are two, a good and an evil. Christ in the Gospel says there are two trees:
22:73
arbor bona numquam facit fructum malum, et arbor mala numquam facit fructum bonum. ecce duas naturas. deinde in euangelio scriptum est: nonne bonum semen seminasti in agro? unde adparuerunt zizania? hoc inimicus fecit. iste\' inimicus si non est extraneus a deo, probetur mihi; si ad deum pertinet inimicus iste, quale semen seminauit? item in euangelio scriptum est Christo dicente, quia in nouissimis temporibus thronum in medio saeculo ponet et mittet angelos suos in orientem et occidentem, septentrionem et meridianum et congregabit omnes gentes ante se et separabit illos, sicut pastor separat agnos ab haedis. et ut compendiue dicam, agnis dicet:
好樹絕不結壞果子,壞樹絕不結好果子。看哪,兩種本性。然後福音中記著:「你豈不是在田裡撒了好種子嗎?那麼稗子從何而來?這是仇敵做的。」這仇敵若不是與神無關的外來者,請向我證明;這仇敵若與神有關,他撒了何等的種子?福音中又記著,基督說在末後的時候他要在世界中間設立寶座,差遣他的使者往東西南北,把萬民聚集在他面前,將他們分別出來,如牧人分別綿羊與山羊。簡言之,他要對綿羊說:
a good tree never makes bad fruit, and a bad tree never makes good fruit. Behold two natures. Then in the Gospel it is written: "Did you not sow good seed in the field? Whence then have the tares appeared? This the enemy has done." This enemy, if he is not foreign to God, let it be proved to me; if this enemy pertains to God, what kind of seed did he sow? Again in the Gospel it is written, Christ saying that in the last times he will set his throne in the midst of the world and will send his angels into the east and the west, the north and the south, and will gather all nations before him and will separate them, as a shepherd separates the lambs from the kids. And, to speak briefly, to the lambs he will say:
22:74
ite in regnum, quod uobis paratum est ab origine mundi. haedis dicet, qui in sinistra parte sunt: recedite a me, qui operati estis iniquitatem; nomen enim meum habuistis, sed opera non fecistis; ite in ignem aeternum, qui paratus est diabolo et angelis eius. qui sunt, qui nomen Christi habent et mittuntur in ignem aeternum cum diabolo et angelis eius, et ad quam partem pertinent isti, quibus Christus non permiscetur, et nomen eius portant? hoc enim Manichaeus dicit, quia quos Christus damnat, ipsius non sunt. nam Paulus apostolus dicit: prudentia carnis inimica est deo; legi enim dei non est subiecta nec enim potest. hoc Manichaeus dicit, quia quae inimica est deo, ad deum non pertinet;
你們進入那從世界之始為你們所預備的國。他要對在左邊的山羊說:離開我,你們這作了不義的人;因為你們曾有我的名,卻沒有行那工作;進入那為魔鬼和他的使者所預備的永火。那些有基督之名、卻與魔鬼和他的使者一同被送入永火的是誰,這些基督不與之相混、卻擔負他名的人屬於哪一部分?因為摩尼如此說,凡基督所定罪的都不屬於他。因為使徒保羅說:屬肉體的智慧是與神為仇的;因為它不服神的律法,也是不能服的。摩尼如此說,凡與神為仇的都不屬於神;
Go into the kingdom which was prepared for you from the origin of the world. To the kids, who are on the left side, he will say: Depart from me, you who have worked iniquity; for you had my name, but you did not do the works; go into the eternal fire, which is prepared for the devil and his angels. Who are they who have the name of Christ and are sent into eternal fire with the devil and his angels, and to what part do these belong, with whom Christ is not mingled, and yet they bear his name? For this Manichaeus says, that those whom Christ condemns are not his. For Paul the Apostle says: the prudence of the flesh is an enemy to God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can it be. This Manichaeus says, that what is an enemy to God does not pertain to God;
22:75
si autem ad deum pertinet, ipse sibi inimicum fecit; hoc Manichaeus non dicit. iterum Paulus dicit: deus saeculi huius excaecauit mentes infidelium ad non contemplandam claritatem euangelii Christi, qui est imago dei. ipse Paulus iterum dicit: datus est mihi stimulus carnis meae, angelus satanae. qui me colaphizat die ac nocte; propter quod dominum rogaui, ut discederet a me . et dixit mihi: sufficit tibi gratia mea; nam uirtus in infirmitate probatur. ecce quid apostolus dixit, ecce quid euangelista.
但它若屬於神,那麼他便為自己造了一個仇敵;這摩尼並不這樣說。保羅又說:這世界的神弄瞎了不信之人的心眼,叫他們不能看見基督榮耀福音的光輝,基督本是神的像。保羅自己又說:有一根我肉體上的刺賜給我,就是撒但的使者,日夜攻擊我;為此我三次求主叫它離開我。主對我說:我的恩典夠你用的;因為德能在軟弱上顯得完全。看哪,這是使徒所說的,看哪,這是福音書作者所說的。
but if it pertains to God, he has made an enemy for himself; this Manichaeus does not say. Again Paul says: the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, that they should not contemplate the brightness of the Gospel of Christ, who is the image of God. Paul himself again says: there was given to me a goad of my flesh, an angel of Satan, who buffets me day and night; wherefore I besought the Lord that it might depart from me. And he said to me: my grace is sufficient for you; for virtue is proved in weakness. Behold what the Apostle has said, behold what the Evangelist has said.
22:76
cum Manichaeus hoc adserat, quia est extraneus a deo, qui contra deum bellauit — siue quia Christus crucifixus est, siue quia apostoli omnes propter dei mandatum — iste, qui eos crucifixit, cui mandatum dei non placet, hoc mihi dicat sanctitas tua, si ad deum pertinet. AUG. dixit: Scripturas sanctas. quas non intellegendo longe a ueritate aberratis, commemorare uoluisti, uelut ex eis patrocinium adhibens uaniloquiis uestris.
既然摩尼如此斷言,就是那與神爭戰的乃與神無關的外來者——無論因為基督被釘十字架,還是因為眾使徒都為神的命令被殺——那麼那位釘他們十字架的、就是神的命令不使之喜悅的,願你的聖德告訴我這事,他是否屬於神。奧古斯丁說:你想要引用聖經,就是你因不明白它們而遠離真理的,彷彿從其中為你的空談取得庇護。
Since Manichaeus asserts this, that he is foreign to God who warred against God — whether because Christ was crucified, or because all the apostles were slain for the sake of God's command — this one who crucified them, whom the command of God does not please, let your Holiness tell me this, whether he pertains to God. AUGUSTINE said: You have wished to cite the holy Scriptures, from which, by not understanding them, you stray far from the truth, as though drawing from them a patronage for your idle talk.
← 上一段下一段 →
← 第 21 章第 23 章 →
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。