📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 書信與論戰集(CSEL)

書信與論戰集(CSEL) 第 45 章 第 2/6 段

拉丁文原文.38 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 45:39–45:76(全章共 197 節)

← 第 44 章第 46 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
45:39
crebrarum autem ille procrastinationum usque adeo fuit inpatiens, ut me, quo diligentius et copiosius respondere cogerer, etiam carmine prouocaret, et bono carmine, unde illum magis ames. sed neque tunc tibi legi potuit ab istarum rerum studio remotissimo neque nunc potest. nam profectio eius tam repentina et perturbata fuit tumultu illo, ut nihil istorum uenire nobis in mentem potuerit; nam id relinquere mihi responsuro statuerat et multa concurrunt, cur ei sermo iste mittatur. primum est, quia debetur, deinde, quia, cuius modi nunc uitam ducamus, etiam sic indicari eius in nos beniuolentiae decet, postremo, quod in gaudio de spe tua nemini cedit.
「但他極不耐煩再三的拖延,以致為了逼我更審慎、更豐富地作答,他竟以詩篇向我挑戰——而且是好詩,你為此更加愛他。但那時它無法讀給你聽,因你那時全然遠離這些事的研究,如今也仍不能。因為他的離去如此突然,又被那場騷亂攪擾得如此不安,以致這些事沒有一件能湧上我們心頭;因為他曾決定把答覆留給我來作,而許多緣由都匯聚起來,說明這篇論述何以當寄給他。第一,因為這是欠他的;其次,因為讓他知道我們如今過著何等樣的生活,也合宜地藉此表明他對我們的善意;最後,因為在為你的盼望而喜樂這事上,他不讓於任何人。
But he was so impatient of frequent postponements that, in order to compel me to answer more carefully and copiously, he even challenged me with verse — and with good verse, for which you love him the more. But it could not be read to you then, so utterly removed as you were from the study of these matters, nor can it now. For his departure was so sudden and so disturbed by that tumult that none of these things could come into our minds; for he had arranged to leave it for me to answer, and many considerations concur why this discourse should be sent to him. The first is that it is owed him; then, that it is fitting his good will toward us should be shown even in this way — namely, what sort of life we now lead; lastly, that in joy over your hope he yields to no one.
45:40
nam et cum praesens esset, pro familiaritate patris tui uel potius omnium nostrum multum sollicitus erat, ne ingenii tui quaedam scintillae, quas diligenter animaduertebat, non tam conflarentur cura mea quam tua extinguerentur incuria; et cum te poeticae quoque studiosum esse cognouerit, sic gratulabitur, ut eum mihi gestientem uidere iam uidear. Nihil mihi quidem gratius facies, inquit; sed siue mobilitatem meam et puerilem leuitatem ridebitis siue aliquo uere diuino nutu et ordine fit in nobis, non uobis dubitem dicere: pigrior sum ad illa metra subito effectus; alia, longe alia nescio quid mihi nunc luce resplenduit.
「因為即便他在場時,出於他與你父親——或更該說與我們眾人——的親密,他也極為關切,惟恐你那天賦的某些火花——他曾殷勤留意的——與其說被我的照料煽成火焰,不如說被你自己的疏懶所熄滅;而當他得知你也醉心於詩藝時,他必如此歡喜,以致我彷彿已看見他在我面前雀躍。」他說:「你確實再沒有能作出比這更討我歡喜的事了;但無論你們是要嘲笑我的善變與孩童般的輕浮,還是這在我們裡面乃是憑某種真正神聖的示意與秩序而成,我都毫不遲疑地告訴你:我對那些格律忽然變得更為懶怠了;另有一物,遠遠不同的一物,如今以某種光輝向我閃耀。
For even when he was present, out of his intimacy with your father — or rather with all of us — he was much concerned lest certain sparks of your talent, which he diligently observed, should not so much be fanned into flame by my care as be extinguished by your own carelessness; and when he shall have learned that you are devoted to poetry as well, he will so rejoice that I already seem to see him exulting before me.' 'You will do nothing more pleasing to me indeed,' he said; 'but whether you will laugh at my fickleness and boyish levity, or whether it comes to pass in us by some truly divine nod and order, I would not hesitate to tell you: I have become suddenly more sluggish toward those meters; something else, far, far different, has now shone out upon me with some light or other.
45:41
pulchrior est philosophia, fateor, quam Thisbe, quam Pyramus, quam illa Uenus et Cupido talesque omnimodi amores. — Et cum suspirio gratias Christo agebat. accepi ego haec, quid dicam libenter aut quid non dicam ? accipiat quisque, ut uolet, nihil curo, nisi quod forte inmodice gaudebam. Interea post paululum dies sese aperuit. surrexerunt illi et ego inlacrimans multa oraui, cum audio Licentium succinentem illud propheticum laete atque garrule: deus uirtutu m, conuerte nos et ostende faciem tuam, et salui erimus. quod pridie post caenam cum ad requisita naturae foras exisset, paulo clarius cecinit., quam ut mater nostra ferre posset, quod illo loco talia continuo repetita canerentur.
「我承認,哲學比提斯柏更美,比皮拉摩斯更美,比那維納斯與丘比特、比一切諸般這樣的愛情都更美。」說著他歎息著向基督獻上感謝。我領受了這些——我該說我欣然領受,還是該說什麼不說呢?各人隨意去看待吧,我毫不在意,只是我或許喜樂得過了分。其間,過了片刻,白晝顯露出來。他們起身,我流著許多眼淚,多多禱告,這時我聽見黎森提烏斯歡然而喋喋地低唱那先知的詩句:「萬軍之神啊,求祢使我們回轉,使祢的臉發光,我們便要得救。」而前一日,當他晚餐後出到外面應自然之需時,他曾唱得稍嫌太響,以致我們的母親難以忍受,因為在那樣的地方竟接連反覆唱著這類詩句。
Philosophy is fairer, I confess, than Thisbe, than Pyramus, than that Venus and Cupid and all such loves of every kind.' And with a sigh he was giving thanks to Christ. I received these things — what shall I say I gladly received, or what shall I not say? Let each take it as he will, I care nothing, save that perhaps I rejoiced immoderately. Meanwhile, after a little while, the day disclosed itself. They rose, and I, shedding many tears, prayed much, when I heard Licentius singing softly and gaily that prophetic verse: 'O God of hosts, turn us, and show us Thy face, and we shall be saved.' And this, the day before, when after supper he had gone outside for the needs of nature, he had sung a little too loudly for our mother to bear, in that such things should be repeated in continuous song in that place.
45:42
nihil enim aliud dicebat, quoniam ipsum cantilenae modum nuper hauserat et amabat, ut fit, melos inusitatum. obiurgauit eum religiosissima, ut scis, femina ob hoc ipsum, quod inconueniens locus cantico esset. tunc ille dixerat iocans: Quasi uero, si quis hic me inimicus includeret, non erat deus exauditurus uocem meam. Ergo mane cum regressus esset solus — nam uterque ob eandem causam processerat — accessit ad lectulum meum: Uerum mihi dic, inquit, ita fiat nobis quod uis, quid de me existimes. — Atque ego adulescentis dexteram adprehendens: Quid, inquam, existimem, sentis credis intellegis. neque enim arbitror te frustra heri tam diu cecinisse, ut uirtutum deus conuerso tibi se ostendat.
「因為他別無所唱,因他新近汲取了那曲調本身,並如常地愛上那不慣的旋律。你所知的那位極虔誠的婦人,正為著這一點責備他,就是那地方不宜歌唱。當時他曾戲言道:「彷彿真的,若有仇敵把我囚禁在此,神就不會垂聽我的聲音似的。」於是清晨,當他獨自回來時——因為二人都為同一緣故出去了——他來到我的小床前,說:「請你老實告訴我——願你所願的臨到我們——你對我有何看法。」我握住這年輕人的右手說:「我所想的,你感受得到、相信得到、也明白:因為我不認為你昨日徒然唱了那麼久,好叫萬軍之神轉向你、將自己顯給你。」
For he sang nothing else, since he had lately imbibed the very tune of the melody and loved, as happens, the unaccustomed strain. That most religious woman, as you know, rebuked him for this very thing, that the place was unbecoming for a song. Then he had said jestingly: 'As if indeed, if some enemy were to shut me in here, God would not be going to hear my voice.' So in the morning, when he had returned alone — for both had gone forth for the same cause — he came to my little bed: 'Tell me truly,' he said, 'so may that which you wish come to pass for us, what you think of me.' And I, taking the young man's right hand: 'What I think,' I said, 'you feel, you believe, you understand. For I do not suppose that yesterday you sang so long in vain, that the God of hosts, being turned toward you, might show Himself to you.'
45:43
— At ille cum admiratione recordatus: Magnum, inquit, dicis et uerum. non enim me ipsum parum mouet, quod modo tam aegre auocabar a nugis illis carminis mei, et iam redire ad eas piget et pudet; ita totus in quaedam magna et mira subuehor. nonne hoc est uere in deum conuerti ? simul et illud gaudeo, quod frustra mihi scrupulus superstitionis iniectus est, quod tali loco talia cantitabam. — Mihi, inquam, neque hoc displicet et ad illum ordinem puto pertinere, ut etiam hinc aliquid diceremus. nam illi cantico et locum ipsum, quo illa offensa est, et noctem congruere uideo.
但他滿懷驚嘆地回想道:「你所說的乃是大事,也是真事。因為這使我頗為觸動:方才我竟如此不情願地被叫離我那詩歌的瑣碎小事,如今我既厭煩又羞於回到它們那裡;我如此全然被托舉入某些偉大奇妙之事。這豈不真是歸向神嗎?同時我也為此歡喜:一份迷信的顧忌徒然被投入我心——就是我在那樣的地方唱這樣的歌。」我說:「這在我看來也並非不悅,我認為這也屬於那秩序,就是我們甚至該從此事說出些什麼。因為我看見,那使她不悅的地方本身,以及那夜晚,都與那首歌相合。
But he, recalling it with admiration: 'You say,' he said, 'a great thing and a true one. For it moves me not a little that just now I was so unwillingly called away from those trifles of my song, and now I am both loath and ashamed to return to them; so wholly am I borne up into certain great and wondrous things. Is not this truly to be turned toward God? At the same time I rejoice also in this, that a scruple of superstition was cast into me in vain — that I was singing such things in such a place.' 'To me,' I said, 'this too is not displeasing, and I think it pertains to that order, that we should say something even from this. For I see that both the very place at which she was offended, and the night, agree with that song.
45:44
a quibus enim rebus putas nos orare ut conuertamur ad deum eiusque faciem uideamus, nisi a quodam ceno corporis atque sordibus et item tenebris, quibus nos error inuoluit? aut quid est aliud conuerti nisi ab inmoderatione uitiorum uirtute ac temperantia in sese adtolli ? quidue aliud est dei facies quam ipsa, cui suspiramus et cui nos amatae mundos pulchrosque reddimus, ueritas? — Melius dici non potest, inquit exclamans; deinde suppressius quasi ad aurem: Uide quaeso, quanta occurrerunt, ut credam erga nos aliquid iam prosperiore ordine fieri. Si ordinem, inquam, curas, redeundum tibi est ad illos uersus.
「因為你認為我們祈求歸向神、得見祂的面,是要脫離什麼呢?豈不是要脫離肉體的某種污泥與骯髒,並同樣脫離那謬誤把我們裹住的黑暗嗎?或者說,歸回若不是憑德行與節制,從諸惡的無度中把自己提升起來,還能是什麼呢?而神的面,若不是那真理本身,我們所渴慕、且蒙其所愛而將自己潔淨美化以獻於它的真理,還能是什麼呢?」他驚呼道:「再沒有比這說得更好的了」;接著更輕聲地,彷彿附在我耳邊:「我求你看看,有多少事湊在一處,使我相信如今有某事正以更亨通的秩序向我們施行。」我說:「你若關切秩序,就必須回到那些詩句去。
For from what things do you think we pray that we may be turned toward God and see His face, if not from a certain mire of the body and its filth, and likewise from the darkness in which error has enwrapped us? Or what else is it to be turned, if not to raise oneself up out of the immoderation of vices by virtue and temperance? And what else is the face of God than that very Truth, for which we sigh, and to which, being loved by it, we render ourselves clean and beautiful?' 'It cannot be said better,' he said, exclaiming; then, more softly, as if into my ear: 'See, I pray, how many things have occurred, so that I may believe that something is now being done toward us in a more prosperous order.' 'If you care for order,' I said, 'you must return to those verses.
45:45
nam eruditio disciplinarum liberalium modesta sane atque succincta et alacriores et perseuerantiores et comtiores exhibet amatores amplectendae ueritati, ut ardentius appetant et constantius insequantur et inhaereant postremo dulcius, quae uocatur, Licenti, beata uita. qua nominata omnes sese erigunt et quasi adtendunt in manus, utrum habeas, quod dare possis egentibus uariisque morbis impeditis.
「因為自由學科的訓練,實在是節制而簡練的,它使那當被擁抱之真理的愛慕者,既更加熱切、更加恆忍,又更加精純,好叫他們更火熱地渴求它、更堅定不移地追隨它,末了更甘甜地緊緊依附它——黎森提烏斯啊,那被稱為至福之生的。一提起它,眾人便都挺身起來,彷彿伸出手來,要看看你是否有什麼可以賜給那貧乏的、並被各樣疾病所纏累的人。
For the training of the liberal disciplines, sober indeed and concise, makes the lovers of the truth that is to be embraced both more eager and more persevering and more refined, so that they may more ardently desire it, more constantly pursue it, and at last more sweetly cling to it — that which is called, Licentius, the blessed life. At the naming of which, all men raise themselves up and, as it were, reach out their hands, to see whether you have something you can give to the needy and to those hindered by various diseases.
45:46
quibus sapientia cum praecipere coeperit, ut medicum perferant seque cum aliqua patientia curari sinant, in pannos suos recidunt, quorum concalefactione tabificati scabiem uoluptatum aerumnosarum scalpunt libentius, quam ut monita medici paululum dura et morbis onerosa perpetiendo atque subeundo ualetudini sanorum lucique reddantur. itaque illo summi dei nomine ac sensu tamquam stipe contenti uiuunt miseri, uiuunt tamen. alios autem uiros uel, ut uerius loquamur, alias animas, dum hoc corpus agunt, iam thalamo suo dignas coniux ille optimus ac pulcherrimus quaerit, quibus non uiuere sed beate uiuere satis est. uade ergo interim ad illas Musas. uerum tamen scis, quid te facere uelim?
「當智慧開始吩咐他們忍受醫生、以幾分耐心任憑自己被醫治時,他們卻退回自己的破布中,被那破布捂暖而潰爛,寧可更快意地搔抓其可憐享樂的癢疥,也不肯藉忍受並承擔醫生那對其病症略嫌嚴厲而沉重的勸誡,得以復歸於健全之人的康健與光明。於是,他們滿足於那至高之神名號與觀念下彷彿一份施捨,可憐地活著——但畢竟活著。然而另有一些人,或更真切地說,另有一些靈魂,當他們驅策這肉身時,那至善至美的新郎已尋覓他們,視為配得入祂洞房的——就是那些單單活著還不夠、必須至福地活著才滿足的靈魂。那麼你暫且到那些繆斯那裡去吧。不過你可知道我願你做什麼?
To whom, when wisdom has begun to prescribe that they endure the physician and suffer themselves to be cured with some patience, they fall back into their rags, warmed by which and putrefying, they more gladly scratch the itch of their wretched pleasures than, by enduring and undergoing the physician's admonitions — a little harsh and burdensome to their diseases — be restored to the health of the whole and to the light. And so, content as with a dole under that name and notion of the most high God, they live wretched — yet they live. But other men, or, to speak more truly, other souls, while they drive this body about, that best and most beautiful Spouse seeks out as already worthy of His bridal chamber — souls to whom not to live, but to live blessedly, is enough. Go therefore meanwhile to those Muses. But yet do you know what I would have you do?
45:47
— Iube, ait, quod placet. — Ubi se, inquam, Pyramus et illa eius super inuicem, ut cantaturus es, interemerint, in dolore ipso, quo tuum carmen uehementius inflammari decet, habes commodissimam oportunitatem. arripe illius foedae libidinis et incendiorum uenenatorum execrationem, quibus miseranda illa contingunt, deinde totus adtollere in laudem puri et sinceri amoris, quo animae doctae disciplinis et uirtute formonsae copulantur intellectui per philosophiam et non solum mortem fugiunt uerum etiam uita beatissima perfruuntur. - Hic ille tacitus ac diu consideratione nutans motato capite abscessit. Deinde ego quoque surrexi redditisque deo cotidianis uotis;
他說:「你所喜悅的,就吩咐吧。」我說:「當皮拉摩斯與他那位女子彼此相疊自盡時——正如你將要歌唱的——在那正應使你的詩歌更猛烈燃燒的悲慟本身之中,你便有了最合宜的良機。你當抓住那對污穢情慾、對那使這些可憐之事臨到他們的有毒烈火的詛咒;然後全然振起,進入對純潔真誠之愛的頌讚——藉此愛,那些精通學科、以德為美的靈魂,經由哲學與理智相結合,不僅逃脫死亡,更充分享有那至福之生。」聽了這話,他默然,久久點頭沉思,搖著頭離去了。隨後我也起身,向神獻上我們每日的禱願,
'Command,' he said, 'what pleases you.' 'When,' I said, 'Pyramus and that woman of his shall have slain themselves one upon the other, as you are about to sing, in that very grief, with which your song ought to be the more vehemently kindled, you have a most convenient opportunity. Seize upon the execration of that foul lust and of the poisoned fires by which those pitiable things befall them; then rise up wholly into the praise of pure and sincere love, by which souls, learned in the disciplines and beautiful with virtue, are joined to the understanding through philosophy, and not only flee death but also enjoy to the full the most blessed life.' At this he, silent and for a long time nodding in consideration, departed with his head shaking. Then I too arose, and having rendered our daily vows to God,
45:48
ire cooperamus in balneas — ille enim locus nobis, cum caelo tristi in agro esse minime poteramus, aptus ad disputandum et familiaris fuit — cum ecce ante fores aduertimus gallos gallinatios ineuntes pugnam nimis acrem. libuit attendere. quid enim non ambiunt, qua non peragrant oculi amantum, ne quid undeunde innuat pulchritudo rationis cuncta scientia et nescientia modificantis et gubernantis, quae inhiantes sibi sectatores suos trahit quacumque atque ubique se quaeri iubet? nam unde aut ubi non potest signum dare ?
「便動身要進浴場——因為那地方,當我們在陰沉的天空下絲毫無法出到田野時,對我們甚是相宜,也是我們慣於辯論之處——不料,就在門前,我們注意到糞堆邊的公雞投入一場過於激烈的鬥爭。我們樂於觀看。因為愛慕者的眼睛有什麼不去環顧,有什麼不去遍尋,惟恐理性之美不知從何處、以某種方式給出一個暗示——那以一切知與不知來測量並管治萬物、把仰慕它的追隨者引往各處、並命人在每一處尋找它的理性?因為它從何處、在何處不能給出徵兆呢?
we set about going into the baths — for that place, when we could by no means be out in the fields under a gloomy sky, was suited to us and familiar for disputing — when, behold, before the doors we noticed dunghill-cocks entering upon an all-too-fierce battle. It pleased us to observe. For what do the eyes of lovers not compass, over what do they not range, lest by some means or other from any source the beauty of reason should give a hint — reason that with all knowing and not-knowing measures and governs, and draws its followers who gape after it wherever, and bids itself be sought in every place? For whence or where can it not give a sign?
45:49
ut in eisdem ipsis gallis erat uidere intenta proiectius capita, inflatas comas, uehementes ictus, cautissimas euitationes et in omni motu animalium rationis expertium nihil non decorum quippe alia ratione desuper omnia moderante; postremo legem ipsam uictoris, superbum cantum et membra in unum quasi orbem collecta uelut in fastum dominationis; signum autem uicti, elatas a ceruice pinnulas et in uoce atque motu deforme totum et eo ipso naturae legibus nescio quo modo concinnum et pulchrum.
「正如在那些公雞身上便可看見:伸向前方的頭、聳起的羽毛、猛烈的擊打、極其謹慎的閃避,以及在這些無理性動物的一切動作中無一不端美——因為另有一位在上的理性節制著萬物;末了還有勝者本身的律法:那高傲的啼鳴,以及彷彿聚攏成一圓球的肢體,宛如進入統治的驕矜;而敗者的記號則是:頸間豎起的細小羽毛,以及在聲音與動作上一切的難看——而正因如此,卻不知怎地按著自然的律法而顯得協調而美麗。
As in those very cocks it was possible to see the heads thrust forward, the ruffled feathers, the vehement blows, the most cautious evasions, and in every movement of animals devoid of reason nothing that was not comely — since another Reason from above moderates all things; and finally the very law of the victor: the proud crowing and the limbs gathered as if into one orb, as though into the haughtiness of dominion; but the sign of the vanquished: the little feathers raised from his neck, and in voice and movement everything unshapely — and by that very fact somehow, according to the laws of nature, harmonious and beautiful.
45:50
Multa quaerebamus, cur sic omnes, cur propter dominationem in subiectas sibi feminas, cur deinde nos ipsa pugnae facies aliquantum et praeter altiorem istam considerationem duceret in uoluptatem spectaculi, quid in nobis esset, quod a sensibus remota multa quaereret, quid rursum, quod ipsorum sensuum inuitatione caperetur. dicebamus nobis ipsis: ubi non lex? ubi non meliori debitum imperium? ubi non umbra constantiae? ubi non imitatio uerissimae illius pulchritudinis? ubi non modus?
「我們問了許多問題:為何一切公雞都如此;為何是為了統治那從屬於牠們的雌鳥;為何那鬥爭的情景本身,甚至撇開那更崇高的思考,也頗把我們引入觀看的快樂;我們裡面有什麼追求著遠離感官的許多事物;又有什麼被感官本身的招引所擄獲。我們對自己說:何處沒有律法?何處不虧欠對更優者的服從?何處沒有恆常的影子?何處沒有對那至真之美的仿效?何處沒有節度?
We asked many questions: why all cocks are so; why for the sake of dominion over the females subject to them; why then the very sight of the fight led us somewhat, even apart from that loftier consideration, into the pleasure of the spectacle; what there was in us that sought after many things removed from the senses; what again there was that was captivated by the very invitation of the senses. We said to ourselves: where is there not law? Where is not command owed to the better? Where is not a shadow of constancy? Where is not an imitation of that most true beauty? Where is not measure?
45:51
atque inde ammoniti, ut spectandi modus esset, perreximus, quo propositum erat, atque ibi, ut potuimus, sane diligenter — nam et recentes res erant et quando poterant tam insignita trium studiosorum memoriam effugere? — omnia nostrae lucubrationis opuscula in hanc libelli partem contulimus nihilque a me aliud factum est illo die, ut ualetudini parcerem, nisi quod ante caenam cum ipsis dimidium uolumen Uergili audire cotidie solitus eram, nihil nobis ubique aliud quam rerum modum considerantibus, quem non probare nemo potest, sentire autem, cum quisque aliquid studiose agit, difficillimum atque rarissimum. Deinde postridie bene mane alacres ad solitum locum conuenimus in eoque consedimus.
「由此得了提醒,就是連觀看也當有節度,我們便前往先前所定之處;在那裡,我們盡力而為,實在殷勤——因為這些事新近才發生,而如此顯著之事幾時能逃出三位熱心學子的記憶呢?——把我們挑燈夜作的一切小篇章都收入這小書的這一部分;那一日我為顧惜身體,別無所作,只是照每日的慣例,晚餐前與他們一同聽半卷維吉爾,我們處處所思量的無非是萬物的節度,這節度無人能不贊同,然而當人熱心做某事時去覺察它,卻是最難也最稀罕的。隨後次日一早,我們精神抖擻地在慣常之處聚集,坐了下來。
And thence admonished that there should be a measure of watching, we proceeded to where we had purposed; and there, as best we could, indeed diligently — for the things were fresh, and when could such notable matters escape the memory of three zealous students? — we gathered all the little works of our lucubration into this part of the little book, and nothing else was done by me that day, to spare my health, except that before supper I was accustomed daily to hear with them half a volume of Virgil, we everywhere considering nothing other than the measure of things, which no one can fail to approve, but to perceive it, when anyone does anything zealously, is most difficult and most rare. Then on the next day, quite early, brisk, we assembled at our accustomed place and sat down in it.
45:52
et ego attentis in me ambobus: Hic esto, inquam, Licenti, quantum potes, et tu quidem, Trygeti; nec enim parua res agitur: de ordine quaerimus. quid ego nunc quasi in schola illa, unde me quoquo modo euasisse gaudeo, constitutus copiose atque ordinate nobis ordinem laudem ? accipite, si uultis — immo facite ut uelitis — quo neque quicquam de huius laude breuius neque, ut mihi uidetur, uerius dici potest. ordo est, quem si tenuerimus in uita, perducet ad deum, et quem nisi tenuerimus in uita, non perueniemus ad deum. peruenturos autem nos iam, nisi me animus de nobis fallit, praesumimus et speramus. diligentissime igitur inter nos ista quaestio uersari debet atque dissolui.
「我見二人都專注地望著我,便說:「黎森提烏斯,你當盡力在此專心,特里格提烏斯,你也一樣;因為所議之事非同小可:我們正探究秩序。如今我何必彷彿置身於我慶幸已藉某種方式逃脫的那學堂中,豐富而井然地向你們稱讚秩序呢?你們若願意,就領受吧——不如說,使自己願意吧——就領受那對此事的稱讚所能說出的最簡短、且在我看來最真確的話。秩序就是這樣一物:我們若在生命中持守它,它必引我們歸向神;而我們若不在生命中持守它,就不能到達神那裡。而我們必要到達——除非我心對我們的判斷有誤——這是我們所預先期許並盼望的。所以,這問題極該在我們中間審慎地探討並解決。
And I, with both attentive upon me: 'Be here,' I said, 'Licentius, as fully as you can, and you too, Trygetius; for it is no small matter that is at stake: we are inquiring about order. Why should I now, as if set in that school from which I rejoice to have escaped by whatever means, praise order to you copiously and in orderly fashion? Receive, if you will — nay rather, make it that you will — that than which nothing can be said more briefly about the praise of this thing, nor, as it seems to me, more truly. Order is that which, if we shall have held it in life, will lead to God, and which, unless we shall have held it in life, we shall not come to God. But that we shall come, unless my mind deceives me about us, we presume and hope. Most diligently, therefore, ought this question to be handled among us and resolved.
45:53
uellem adessent ceteri, qui nobiscum his negotiis solent interesse; uellem, si fieri potest, non istos tantum, sed omnes saltem familiares nostros, quorum semper admiror ingenium, nunc mecum habere quam uos estis intentos, aut certe ipsum tantum Zenobium, quem de hac re tanta molientem numquam pro eius magnitudine otiosus accepi. sed quia id non euenit, legent litteras nostras, quoniam instituimus iam de istis rebus uerba non perdere resque ipsas a memoria fugaces scriptorum quasi uinculo, quo reducantur, innectere. et sic fortasse ordo ipse poscebat, qui eorum procurauit absentiam.
「我巴不得其餘常與我們同參這些探究的人都在場;我巴不得,若可能,不僅這幾位,而是至少所有我素來欽佩其天資的親密友人,此刻都能像你們這樣專注地與我同在——或至少單單澤諾比烏斯一人,他就這樣重大之事竭力鑽研,我卻從未有相稱於其重大的閒暇來接待他。但因這事未能實現,他們便要讀我們的著作,既然我們如今已決意不再就這些事白費言語,而要以文字的鎖鏈,把那從記憶中逃逸的事物本身繫住,好使它們可被追回。如此,或許正是秩序本身要求了這事——就是那促成他們缺席的秩序。
I could wish the others were present, who are wont to take part with us in these pursuits; I could wish, if it might be, to have with me not only these, but at least all our intimate friends, whose genius I always admire, now as intent as you are — or at any rate Zenobius alone, whom, laboring over this so great a matter, I never received at leisure in proportion to its greatness. But because that does not come to pass, they will read our writings, since we have now resolved not to lose words about these matters, and to bind the things themselves, fleeting from memory, with the fetter, as it were, of writings, by which they may be brought back. And thus perhaps order itself demanded it, order which brought about their absence.
45:54
nam et uos profecto in rem tantam, quia solis perferenda inponitur nobis, erectiore animo insurgitis et cum illi legerint, qui nobis maxima cura sunt, si quid eos mouerit ad contradicendum, alias nobis disputationes disputatio ista procreabit seque ipsa successio sermonum in ordinem inseret disciplinae. sed nunc, ut promiseram, Licentio, quantum res patitur, aduersabor, qui totam causam iam paene confecit, si possit eam defensionis muro stabiliter firmeque uallare. Hic, ubi eos silentio uultu oculis suspensione atque immobilitate membrorum et rei magnitudine satis commotos et audiendi desiderio inflammatos esse conspexi:
「因為你們無疑也要以更振奮的心,投入這樣重大之事——因為單單交託我們去完成它;而當那些我們最為掛念的人讀了之後,若有什麼觸動他們去反駁,這場辯論便要為我們生出別的辯論,而言談的接續本身也要編入這門學問的秩序之中。但如今,正如我先前所應許的,我要盡此事所容許地與黎森提烏斯對辯——他如今幾乎已把整個論題完成,只要他能穩固而堅實地以防禦的壁壘將它環護起來。」此時,我看出他們憑其靜默、憑其神情、憑其眼神、憑其肢體的懸凝與不動,已充分被這事的重大所觸動、被聽聞的渴望所點燃:
For you too, assuredly, into so great a matter — because it is laid upon us alone to be carried through — rise up with a more erect mind; and when those shall have read who are our greatest care, if anything shall move them to contradiction, this disputation will beget for us other disputations, and the very succession of discourses will insert itself into the order of the discipline. But now, as I had promised, I will oppose Licentius, as far as the matter allows — Licentius who has now almost completed the whole cause, if only he can steadfastly and firmly wall it round with the rampart of defense.' Here, when I perceived that by their silence, by their countenance, by their eyes, by the suspense and immobility of their limbs they were sufficiently moved by the greatness of the matter and inflamed with the desire of hearing:
45:55
Ergo, inquam, Licenti, si tibi uidetur, collige in te quidquid uirium potes, elima quidquid habes acuminis et ordo iste quid sit definitione conplectere. — Tum ille ubi se ad definiendum cogi audiuit, quasi aqua frigida adspersus exhorruit et turbatiore uultu me intuens atque, ut fit, ipsa trepidatione subridens: Quid hoc est rei? quid quasi tibi uideor, inquit, annuere? nescio, quo aduenticio spiritu me credis inflatum. — Statimque sese animans. Aut fo.tasse, ait, aliquid mecum est? — Paululumque siluit, ut in definitionem, quidquid illi de ordine notionis erat, conduceretur, deinde erectior: Ordo est, inquit, per quem aguntur omnia, quae deus constituit. Quid?
「於是我說:「所以,黎森提烏斯,你若覺得好,就在你裡面聚集你所能的一切力量,磨利你所有的一切敏銳,並以一個定義來把握這秩序是什麼。」於是他聽見自己被逼下定義,便彷彿被冷水潑到般戰慄,以更煩亂的神情望著我,又如常地為自己的驚惶而微笑,說:「這是怎麼回事?我怎麼在你看來彷彿在點頭應允?我不知道你以為我被什麼外來的靈所充滿。」隨即振作起來,說:「或許有什麼與我同在?」他略略靜默,好把他對秩序所有的任何觀念收攏成一個定義;然後更挺直身子說:「秩序,就是神所立定的一切事都藉以被施行的那一位。」我說:「怎麼?
'Therefore, Licentius,' I said, 'if it seems good to you, collect within yourself whatever of strength you can, sharpen whatever of keenness you have, and embrace by a definition what this order is.' Then he, when he heard himself compelled to define, shuddered as if sprinkled with cold water, and gazing at me with a more troubled countenance and, as happens, smiling at his very trepidation: 'What matter is this?' he said. 'Why do I seem to you, as it were, to nod assent? I know not with what adventitious spirit you believe me inflated.' And straightway rousing himself: 'Or perhaps,' he said, 'something is with me?' And he was silent a little, that whatever notion of order he had might be gathered into a definition; then, more erect: 'Order,' he said, 'is that through which are done all the things which God has established.' 'What?
45:56
ipse deus, inquam, non tibi uidetur agi ordine? — Prorsus, inquit, uidetur. - Ergo agitur deus? ait Trygetius. — Et ille: Quid enim? inquit; Christum deum negas, qui et ordine ad nos uenit et a patre deo missum esse se dicit? si igitur deus Christum \' ordine ad nos misit et deum Christum esse non negamus, non solum agit omnia sed agitur etiam deus ordine. — Hic Trygetius addubitans: Nescio, inquit, quomodo istuc accipiam. deum enim quando nominamus, non quasi mentibus ipse Christus occurrit, sed pater. ille autem tunc occurrit, quando dei filium nominamus. — Bellam rem facis, inquit Licentius. negabimus ergo dei filium deum esse?
「我說:「神自己在你看來豈不是也按秩序而被推動嗎?」他說:「絕對是的,看來如此。」特里格提烏斯說:「那麼神也被推動嗎?」他說:「那又如何呢?你否認基督是神嗎——祂既按秩序來到我們這裡,又說自己是父神所差遣的?所以,若神按秩序把基督差來我們這裡,而我們不否認基督是神,那麼神就不僅施行萬事,甚至也按秩序被推動。」此時特里格提烏斯遲疑道:「我不知道該如何接受這話。因為當我們稱『神』時,彷彿浮現於我們心思的並非基督本身,而是父。惟當我們稱『神的兒子』時,祂才浮現。」黎森提烏斯說:「你這說法好極了。那麼我們要否認神的兒子是神嗎?」
Does God Himself,' I said, 'not seem to you to be moved by order?' 'Absolutely,' he said, 'He seems so.' 'Then is God moved?' said Trygetius. And he: 'For what then?' he said; 'do you deny that Christ is God, who both came to us in order and says that He was sent by God the Father? If therefore God sent Christ to us in order, and we do not deny that Christ is God, then God not only does all things but is even moved in order.' Here Trygetius, hesitating: 'I know not,' he said, 'how I am to accept this. For when we name God, it is not Christ Himself who as it were meets our minds, but the Father. But He meets us then, when we name the Son of God.' 'You do a fine thing,' said Licentius. 'Shall we then deny that the Son of God is God?'
45:57
— Hic ille, cum ei respondere periculosum uideretur, tamen se coegit atque ait: Et hic quidem deus est, sed tamen proprie patrem deum dicimus. — Cui ego: Cohibe te potius, inquam; non enim filius improprie deus dicitur. — At ille religione commotus cum etiam uerba sua scripta esse nollet, urguebat Licentius, ut manerent, puerorum scilicet more uel potius hominum — pro nefas! — paene omnium, quasi uero gloriandi causa inter nos illud ageretur. cuius motum animi cum obiurgarem grauioribus uerbis, erubuit. qua eius perturbatione animaduerti ridentem laetantemque Trygetium et ambobus: Itane agitis? inquam;
「此時那人,雖覺回答有險,卻仍勉強自己說:「這一位確實也是神,但我們仍以本義稱父為神。」我對他說:「你倒不如克制自己;因為稱子為神並非不合本義。」但他被虔誠的顧忌所觸動,甚至不願自己的話被記下,黎森提烏斯卻力主應予保留——誠然是照著孩童的樣式,或更該說是照著幾乎所有人的樣式——唉,可恥啊!——彷彿那事在我們中間真是為著誇口而進行似的。當我以更嚴厲的話責備他這心緒的騷動時,他臉紅了。在他這番慌亂中,我察覺特里格提烏斯正發笑歡喜,便對他們二人說:「你們竟這樣行事嗎?」
Here the other, though it seemed perilous to answer, yet forced himself and said: 'This one also indeed is God, but nevertheless we properly call the Father God.' To whom I: 'Restrain yourself rather,' I said; 'for the Son is not improperly called God.' But he, moved by religious scruple, when he did not even wish his words to be written down, Licentius urged that they should remain — after the manner of boys, to be sure, or rather of men — O the shame! — of almost all — as if indeed for the sake of boasting that matter were being carried on among us. When I rebuked his agitation of mind with graver words, he blushed. At which perturbation of his I noticed Trygetius laughing and rejoicing, and to both of them: 'Is it thus you carry on?' I said;
45:58
nonne uos mouet, quibus uitiorum molibus atque imperitiae tenebris premamur et cooperiamur? haecinest illa paulo ante uestra, de qua ineptus laetabar, attentio et in deum ueritatemque surrectio? o si uideretis uel tam lippientibus oculis quam ego, in quibus periculosis iaceamus, cuius morbi dementiam risus iste indicet! o si uideretis! quam cito, quam statim quantoque productius eum uerteretis in fletus! miseri, nescitis ubi simus? demersos quidem esse animos omnium stultorum indoctorumque commune est, sed non uno atque eodem modo demersis opem sapientia et manum porrigit. alii sunt, credite, alii sunt, qui sursum uocantur, alii, qui in profunda laxantur.
「你們豈不觸動,就是我們被何等成堆的惡習、被何等無知的黑暗所壓迫、所覆蓋?這就是你們方才那份令我愚蠢地歡喜的專注、那向著神與真理的振起嗎?唉,但願你們能看見,哪怕以我這樣昏花的眼睛,看見我們臥於何等的危險之中,看見你們這笑聲所洩露的乃是何等病症的瘋狂!唉,但願你們能看見!你們必何等迅速、何等即刻、又何等更長久地將它化為哭泣!可憐的人啊,你們不知我們身在何處嗎?一切愚昧無學之人的靈魂確實都沉沒了,這是他們共有的;但智慧並不以同一種方式向那些沉沒者伸出援手與手臂。信我吧,有一些人,確有一些人,是被向上呼召的;另有一些人,則是被放縱墜入深淵的。
'does it not move you, by what masses of vices and by what darkness of ignorance we are pressed down and covered over? Is this that attention of yours a little while ago, over which I foolishly rejoiced, and that rising up toward God and the truth? O if you could see, even with eyes so bleared as mine, in what perils we lie, of what disease this laughter of yours betrays the madness! O if you could see! How quickly, how instantly, and with what greater length you would turn it into weeping! Wretches, do you not know where we are? That the souls of all the foolish and unlearned are indeed submerged is common to them; but wisdom does not extend aid and hand to those submerged in one and the same manner. There are some, believe me, there are some, who are called upward; others who are let loose into the depths.
45:59
nolite, obsecro uos, geminare mihi miserias. satis mihi sint uulnera mea, quae ut sanentur, paene cotidianis fletibus deum rogans indigniorem tamen esse me, qui tam cito saner, quam uolo, saepe memet ipse conuinco. nolite, obsecro, si quid mihi amoris, si quid necessitudinis debetis, si intellegitis, quantum uos diligam, quanti faciam, quantum me cura exagitet morum uestrorum, si dignus sum, quem non neglegatis, si denique deo teste non mentior, nihil me plus mihi optare quam uobis, rependite mihi beneficium, et si me magistrum libenter uocatis, reddite mihi mercedem: boni estote!
「我懇求你們,不要加倍我的愁苦。願我自己的創傷於我已足,這些創傷,為求得醫治,我幾乎每日以近乎每日的眼淚祈求神,卻常常自己定自己的罪,說我太不配像我所願的那樣迅速得醫。我懇求你們——你們若對我欠有絲毫的愛、絲毫的情誼,你們若明白我何等愛你們、何等看重你們、對你們品行的掛慮何等折磨我,我若配得你們不輕忽我,末了,若有神為證我並未說謊——我為自己所渴求的,無非就是為你們所渴求的——就報答我這恩惠;你們若甘心稱我為師,就付我工價:作好人吧!」
Do not, I beseech you, redouble my miseries. Let my own wounds suffice me, wounds which, that they may be healed, I daily beg God with almost daily tears, yet often convict my very self that I am too unworthy to be healed as quickly as I wish. Do not, I beseech you — if you owe me anything of love, anything of bond, if you understand how much I love you, how much I esteem you, how much care for your characters torments me, if I am worthy that you not neglect me, if finally, with God as witness, I lie not that I desire nothing more for myself than for you — repay me the benefit; and if you gladly call me master, render me my wage: be good!'
45:60
Hic ubi, ne plura dicerem, lacrimae mihi modum imposuerunt, Licentius molestissime ferens, quod omnia scribebantur: Quid enim, ait, fecimus, oro te ? - Adhuc, inquam, nec fateris saltem peccatum tuum ? tu nescis in illa schola grauiter me stomachari solitum, quod usque adeo pueri non utilitate ac decore disciplinarum sed inanissimae laudis amore ducerentur, ut quosdam etiam aliena uerba recitare non puderet exciperentque plausus — o ingemescendum malum! — ab eisdem ipsis, quorum erant illa, quae recitabant.
「此時,當眼淚給我的言說設下界限,使我不再多說,黎森提烏斯極為難受地忍著一切都被記下的事,說:「我求問你,我們究竟做了什麼?」我說:「你到如今竟連自己的過錯也不承認嗎?你不知道我在那學堂裡素常大為惱怒,因為那些少年被引動的,不是憑學科的益處與美好,而是憑對最空洞之稱讚的愛慕,以致有些人甚至不以誦讀他人之作為恥,還從那些作品本是他們的人那裡博得喝采——唉,可歎的惡啊!——就是從那些其作品被誦讀者本人那裡?
Here, when tears set a limit upon my speaking that I should say no more, Licentius, bearing it most grievously that everything was being written down: 'What indeed,' he said, 'have we done, I ask you?' 'Do you still,' I said, 'not even confess your fault? Do you not know that in that school I was wont to be gravely vexed, because boys were led on, not by the usefulness and beauty of the disciplines, but by love of the emptiest praise, so that some were not even ashamed to recite the words of others and received applause — O evil to be groaned over! — from those very men whose were the things they were reciting?
45:61
ita uos, quamuis nihil umquam, ut opinor, tale feceritis, tamen et in philosophiam et in eam uitam, quam me tandem occupasse laetor, aemulationis tabificae atque inanis iactantiae ultimam sed nocentiorem ceteris omnibus pestem introducere ac proseminare conamini et fortasse, quia uos ab ista uanitate morboque deterreo, pigriores eritis ad studia doctrinae et ab ardore uentosae famae repercussi in torporem inertiae congelabitis. me miserum, si necesse erit tales etiam nunc perpeti, a quibus uitia decedere sine aliorum uitiorum successione non possint! — Probabis, ait Licentius, quam purgatiores futuri simus.
「所以你,雖然依我看你從未做過任何這類事,卻仍試圖將那最末後、卻比其餘一切都更有害的瘟疫——就是那害人的競逐與空虛的自誇——引進並散播到哲學之中,以及我慶幸自己終於採取的那種生活之中;而且或許,正因我勸阻你遠離那虛榮與病症,你反倒對學問的鑽研更為懶怠,被虛浮名聲的熱火所彈回,凍結入怠惰的麻木之中。可憐的我啊,倘若如今竟還須忍受這樣的人——惡習從他們身上離去,非有別的惡習接續便不能!」黎森提烏斯說:「你將要看出我們日後會何等地更加潔淨。」
So you, although you have never, as I think, done any such thing, nevertheless are attempting to introduce and sow, both into philosophy and into that life which I rejoice to have at last taken up, the last but more harmful plague of all — that of pestilential rivalry and of empty boasting; and perhaps, because I deter you from that vanity and disease, you will be the more sluggish toward the studies of learning, and, repelled from the ardor of windy fame, you will freeze into the torpor of inertia. Wretched me, if it shall be necessary to endure even now such men, from whom vices cannot depart without the succession of other vices!' 'You shall prove,' said Licentius, 'how much purer we shall be in the future.'
45:62
modo illud obsecramus per omnia, quae diligis, ut ignotum nobis uelis atque illa omnia deleri iubeas, simul ut parcas etiam tabulis, quas iam non habemus. non enim aliquid in libros translatum est eorum, quae a nobis multa disserta sunt. — Prorsus, inquit Trygetius, maneat nostra poena, ut ea ipsa quae nos inlicit fama flagello proprio a suo amore deterreat. ut enim solis amicis et familiaribus nostris litterae istae innotescant, non parum desudabimus. — Assensus est ille. Atque interea mater ingressa est quaesiuitque a nobis, quid promouissemus; nam et ei quaestio nota erat. cuius et ingressum et rogationem cum scribi nostro more iussissem: Quid agitis? inquit;
「我們只求這一件,憑你所愛的一切:願你甘心讓這事對我們隱而不顯,並吩咐把那一切都刪去,同時也饒過那些我們已不再擁有的蠟板。因為我們所討論的那許多話,並沒有一句被謄入書中。」特里格提烏斯說:「無論如何,願我們的懲罰得以存留,好使那引誘我們的名聲本身,以它自己的鞭子,把我們從對它的愛慕中嚇退。因為要使這些著作只被我們的朋友與密友所知,我們必得大大流汗。」他表示同意。其間,我們的母親進來,問我們有何進展;因為這問題她也知道。當我照我們的慣例吩咐把她的進來與發問都記下時,她說:「你們在做什麼?
'Only this we beseech, by all that you love, that you be willing that it remain unknown to us, and that you command all those things to be deleted, and at the same time that you spare even the tablets, which we no longer have. For nothing has been transferred into the books of those many things which have been discussed by us.' 'By all means,' said Trygetius, 'let our penalty remain, that that very fame which entices us may, by its own scourge, deter us from love of it. For that these writings may become known only to our friends and intimates, we shall sweat not a little.' He assented. And meanwhile our mother entered and inquired of us what progress we had made; for the question was known to her too. When I had ordered both her entrance and her question to be written down after our manner: 'What are you doing?' she said;
45:63
numquidnam in illis quos legitis libris etiam feminas umquam audiui in hoc genus disputationes inductas? — Cui ego: Non ualde curo, inquam, superborum imperitorumque iudicia, qui similiter in legendos libros atque in salutandos homines inruunt. non enim cogitant, quales ipsi, sed qualibus induti uestibus sint et quanta pompa rerum fortunaeque praefulgeant. isti enim in litteris non multum attendunt, aut unde sit quaestio aut quo peruenire disserentes moliantur quidue ab eis explicatum atque confectum sit.
「在你們所讀的那些書中,我可曾聽說連婦人也被引入這類辯論?」我對她說:「我並不太在意那些驕傲無知之人的評斷,他們撲向要讀的書,正如撲向要問安的人一般。因為他們不去思量那些人本身是何等樣,只看他們穿著何等衣裳,又以何等排場的產業與命運閃耀。因為這樣的人,在著作中並不太留意問題從何而起、或推理者力求到達何處、或他們把什麼展開並完成了。
in those books which you read, did I ever hear that even women were brought into disputations of this kind?' To whom I: 'I do not much care,' I said, 'for the judgments of the proud and the ignorant, who rush upon books to be read just as upon men to be greeted. For they do not consider what the men themselves are, but with what sort of garments they are clad, and with how great a pomp of estate and fortune they glitter. For such men, in writings, do not much attend either whence a question arises, or whither those reasoning strive to arrive, or what has been unfolded and completed by them.
45:64
in quibus tamen quia nonnulli reperiuntur, quorum animi contemnendi non sunt — aspersi sunt enim quibusdam condimentis humanitatis et facile per aureas depictasque ianuas ad sacrosancta philosophiae penetralia perducuntur — satis eis fecerunt et maiores nostri, quorum libros tibi nobis legentibus notos esse uideo, et his temporibus — ut omittam ceteros — uir et ingenio et eloquentia et ipsis insignibus muneribusque fortunae et, quod ante omnia est, mente praestantissimus Theodorus, quem bene ipsa nosti, id agit, ut et nunc et apud posteros nullum genus hominum de litteris nostrorum temporum iure conqueratur. mei autem libri si quorum forte manus tetigerint lectoque meo nomine non dixerint:
「然而,既然他們當中不乏心智不可鄙視之人——因為他們沾染了某些人文教養的調味,且易於經由金碧繪飾的門戶被引入哲學至聖的內殿——我們的先賢已為他們做得夠多了,他們的著作,我看在我們讀給你聽時你已熟悉;而在這個時代——姑且略過其餘的人——有一位在天資、口才、以及命運的種種徽記與職位上都極為卓越,且尤在心智上最為出眾的人,就是你自己所深知的提奧多魯斯,他正致力於使無論如今或在後世,都沒有任何一類人有理由抱怨我們這時代的文墨。但我的書,倘若有誰的手偶然觸及它們,讀了我的名字卻不曾說:
Yet since among them are found not a few whose minds are not to be despised — for they are sprinkled with certain seasonings of humane culture, and are easily led through golden and painted doors to the sacrosanct inner shrines of philosophy — both our forebears have done enough for them, whose books I see are known to you from our reading, and in these times — to pass over the rest — a man most excellent in genius and in eloquence and in the very insignia and offices of fortune, and, what is before all things, in mind, Theodorus, whom you yourself know well, is bringing it about that neither now nor among posterity shall any kind of men justly complain about the letters of our times. But my books, if the hands of any shall perhaps have touched them, and having read my name they shall not have said:
45:65
\'iste quis est?\' codicemque proiecerint, sed uel curiosi uel nimium studiosi contemta uilitate liminis intrare perrexerint, me tecum philosophantem non moleste ferent nec quemquam istorum, quorum meis litteris sermo miscetur, fortasse contemnent. sunt enim non solum liberi, quod cuiuis disciplinae liberali, nedum philosophiae satis est, sed summo apud suos loco nati. doctissimorum autem hominum litterae etiam sutores philosophatos et multo uiliora fortunarum genera continent, qui tamen tanta ingenii uirtutisque luce fulserunt, ut bona sua cum qualibet huiusce modi nobilitate nullo modo uellent, etiamsi possent, ulla conditione mutare.
「這人是誰?」便把書卷丟開;但假若他們或出於好奇、或出於過度的熱忱,輕看了這門檻的卑微而仍舊進來,他們必不會因我與你一同從事哲學而見怪,或許也不會輕看那些其言談與我的著作交織在一起的人。因為這些人不僅是自由出身的(這對任何一門文雅之學都已足夠,更何況是哲學),而且是在他們本族中生於最高地位的人。再者,最有學問之人的著作中,甚至記載了從事哲學的鞋匠,以及境遇遠為卑微的各類人;他們卻以如此偉大的天資與德性之光輝耀,以致無論以任何條件,即使可能,他們也絕不願將自己的美善換取這一類的任何顯貴。
'Who is this fellow?' and cast the book aside; but if instead, whether from curiosity or from excessive zeal, they scorn the meanness of the threshold and press on to enter, they will not take it ill that I philosophize together with you, nor will they perhaps despise any of those whose discourse is mingled with my writings. For these men are not only free-born — which is enough for any liberal discipline, let alone for philosophy — but were born in the highest rank among their own people. Moreover, the writings of the most learned men include even cobblers who took to philosophy, and men of far humbler conditions of fortune, who nevertheless shone with so great a light of genius and virtue that on no terms would they be willing, even if they could, to exchange their own goods for any nobility whatsoever of this kind.
45:66
nec deerit, mihi crede, tale hominum genus, cui plus placeat hoc ipsum, quia mecum philosopharis, quam si quid hic aliud aut iucunditatis aut grauitatis inuenerit. nam et feminae sunt apud ueteres philosophatae et philosophia tua mihi plurimum placet. Nam ne quid, mater, ignores, hoc Graecum uerbum, quo philosophia nominatur, Latine amor sapientiae dicitur. unde etiam diuinae scripturae, quas uehementer amplecteris, non omnino philosophos, sed philosophos huius mundi uitandos atque inridendos esse praecipiunt. esse autem alium mundum ab istis oculis remotissimum, quem paucorum sanorum intellectus intuetur, satis ipse Christus significat, qui non dicit: \'regnum meum non est de mundo\', sed:
請相信我,也絕不會缺少這樣一類的人,對他們來說,你與我一同從事哲學這件事本身,比他們在此發現任何別的東西——無論是趣味還是莊重——都更令人喜悅。因為在古人當中也有從事哲學的婦女,而你的哲學也極得我心。母親啊,為叫你在任何事上都不至無知:這個用來稱呼「哲學」的希臘詞,在拉丁文中乃是「愛慕智慧」之意。因此,就連你所熱切懷抱的聖經,也吩咐我們當躲避並譏笑的,並非泛指一切哲學家,而是這世界的哲學家。而確有另一個世界,遠離這些肉眼所及,唯有少數清明的悟性得以窺見;基督自己已充分表明了這一點,祂並不說「我的國不屬於世界」,而是說:
Nor will there be lacking, believe me, such a kind of men to whom this very thing is more pleasing — that you philosophize with me — than if they had found here anything else, whether of charm or of gravity. For among the ancients there were also women who philosophized, and your philosophy pleases me exceedingly. For, mother, that you may not be ignorant of anything: this Greek word by which philosophy is named is in Latin called the love of wisdom. Whence even the divine Scriptures, which you so vehemently embrace, enjoin us to shun and deride, not philosophers absolutely, but the philosophers of this world. And that there is another world, most remote from these bodily eyes, which the understanding of a few sound minds beholds, Christ himself sufficiently signifies, who does not say, 'My kingdom is not of the world,' but:
45:67
regnum meum non est de hoc mundo. nam quisquis omnem philosophiam fugiendam putat, nihil nos uult aliud quam non amare sapientiam. contemnerem te igitur in his litteris meis, si sapientiam non amares, non autem contemnerem, si eam mediocriter amares, multo minus, si tantum, quantum ego, amares sapientiam. nunc uero cum eam multo plus quam me ipsum diligas 3^ nouerim, quantum me diligas, cumque in ea tantum profeceris; ut iam nec cuiusuis incommodi fortuiti nec ipsius mortis, TUOC. uiris doctissimis difficillimum est, horrore terrearis, quam summam philosophiae arcem omnes esse confitentur, egone me non libenter tibi etiam discipulum dabo?
「我的國不屬於這世界。」凡以為一切哲學都當躲避的人,無非是要我們不去愛慕智慧。所以,倘若你不愛智慧,我在這些著作中就會輕看你;但若你只是平淡地愛它,我便不會輕看你;若你愛智慧如我一般深,就更不會了。然而如今,既然我曉得你愛智慧遠勝於愛你自己——因為我已知道你何等愛我——並且你在其中已進步如此之多,以致無論是任何偶然的災禍還是死亡本身的恐懼都不能使你戰慄(這連最有學問之人也極難做到,眾人卻都承認這乃是哲學的至高堡壘):那麼,我豈不甘心情願連作你的門徒也在所不辭嗎?
'My kingdom is not of this world.' For whoever thinks that all philosophy is to be fled from wills nothing else of us than that we should not love wisdom. I would therefore despise you in these writings of mine if you did not love wisdom; but I would not despise you if you loved it moderately, and much less if you loved wisdom as much as I do. But as it is, since I know that you love it much more than you love your very self — for I have come to know how much you love me — and since you have advanced so far in it that now you are terrified by the dread neither of any chance misfortune nor even of death itself (a thing most difficult even for the most learned men), which all confess to be the highest citadel of philosophy: shall I not gladly give myself to you even as a disciple?
45:68
Hic illa cum blande ac religiose numquam me tantum mentitum esse dixisset et uiderem tam multa nos uerba fudisse, ut neque scribenda non essent et iam libri modus esset neque tabulae reliquae forent, placuit quaestionem differri, simul ut meo stomacho parcerem. nam eum plus, quam uellem, commouerant ea, quae mihi euomenda in illos adulescentes necessario uisa sunt. sed cum abire coepissemus: Memento, inquit Licentius, quam multa et quam necessaria nobis abs te accipienda per occultissimum illum diuinumque ordinem etiam te nesciente subministrentur. — Uideo, inquam, et ingratus deo non sum uosque ipsos, qui haec aduertitis, ob id ipsum praesumo fore meliores.
這時,她溫柔而虔敬地說,我從未撒過如此大的謊;而我看見我們已傾吐了如此多的話,既不可不記下來,書卷也已達到了它的篇幅,蠟板也所剩無幾,於是我便決定把這問題延後——同時也為了顧惜我的胃。因為那些我覺得非向那些青年吐露不可的話,已比我所願的更攪動了它。但當我們動身要離開時,利琴提烏斯說:「請記住,藉著那最隱密而神聖的秩序,甚至在你不知不覺之間,有多少何等必要的事物供給我們,好從你這裡領受。」——「我看見了,」我說,「我對神並非不知感恩;並且我料想,你們這些留意這些事的人,正因此緣故必要變得更好。」
Here, when she had said gently and reverently that I had never told so great a lie, and when I saw that we had poured out so many words that they both ought not to be left unwritten and the book had already reached its measure, and no more tablets remained, it seemed good to defer the question — at the same time that I might spare my stomach. For the things which it seemed to me necessary to spew out against those young men had disturbed it more than I would have wished. But when we had begun to depart, Licentius said: 'Remember how many and how necessary things are supplied to us to be received from you, through that most hidden and divine order, even without your knowing it.' — 'I see it,' I said, 'and I am not ungrateful to God; and I presume that you yourselves, who observe these things, will for that very reason become better.'
45:69
— Hoc fuit tantum illo die negotium meum. LIBER SECUNDUS. Interpositis deinde pauculis diebus uenit Alypius et exorto sole clarissimo inuitauit caeli nitor et, quantum in illis locis hieme poterat; blanda temperies in pratum descendere, quo saepius et familiarius utebamur. nobiscum erat etiam mater nostra, cuius ingenium atque in res diuinas inflammatum animum cum antea conuictu diuturno et diligenti consideratione perspexeram tum uero in quadam disputatione non paruae rei, quam die natali meo cum conuiuis habui atque in libellum contuli, tanta mihi mens eius apparuerat, ut nihil aptius uerae philosophiae uideretur.
這就是我那天全部的事務。第二卷。此後過了幾天,阿利庇烏斯來了;一輪極其燦爛的太陽升起,天空的明亮,以及——在那些地方冬天所能有的——一種宜人的溫和,邀我們下到那片草地去,那是我們相當常去而熟悉之處。與我們同在的還有我們的母親;她的天賦和她那向著神聖之事燃燒的心靈,我早已從長久的相處與細心的觀察中察覺到;然而尤其是在我生日那天,我與賓客們就一件非同小可之事所作的一場討論中(我已把它記在一本小冊子裡),她的心智向我顯得如此偉大,以致再沒有什麼比它更合乎真正的哲學了。
This was the whole of my business on that day. BOOK TWO. Then, after a few days had intervened, Alypius came; and as a most brilliant sun rose, the brightness of the sky and — as far as was possible in those places in winter — a caressing mildness invited us to go down into the meadow which we used rather often and familiarly. With us was also our mother, whose native talent and whose spirit inflamed toward divine things I had already perceived both from long-standing companionship and careful consideration; but above all, in a certain discussion of no small matter which I held with my guests on my birthday and set down in a little book, so great a mind of hers had appeared to me that nothing seemed more fitted to true philosophy.
45:70
itaque institueram, cum abundaret otio, agere, ut conloquio nostro non deesset. quod et in primo etiam huius operis libro abs te cognitum est. Cum igitur memorato in loco, ut commode potuimus, consedissemus, ego illis duobus adulescentibus: Quamuis uobis, inquam, suscensuerim pueriliter de magnis rebus agentibus, tamen mihi uidetur non sine ordine propitio deo accidisse, quod in sermone, quo uos ab ista leuitate detrahebam, tempus ita consumptum est, ut res tanta ad Alypii aduentum dilata uideatur. quapropter quoniam ei iam quaestionem notissimam feci et quantum in ea processerimus ostendi, paratusne es, Licenti, causam, quam suscepisti, ex illa tua definitione defendere?
因此我早已決意:一等她有空閒,就設法使她不缺席於我們的談話。這一點你在本書的第一卷中也已知道了。所以,當我們在前述之地盡可能舒適地坐定之後,我對那兩位青年說:「雖然我曾因你們以幼稚的態度處理重大之事而向你們發怒,但在我看來,這似乎並非沒有一種恩慈的秩序而發生的;因為在我藉以把你們從那輕浮中拉回的談話裡,時間就這樣被耗去,以致這樁大事似乎被推遲到了阿利庇烏斯的到來。故此,既然我如今已把這問題向他講明,並已顯示我們在其中進展到何處,利琴提烏斯,你可準備好從你那定義出發,來為你所承擔的立場辯護嗎?」
And so I had resolved, when she should have leisure to spare, to see to it that she was not absent from our conversation. And this too you came to know even in the first book of this work. When therefore we had seated ourselves in the aforesaid place, as conveniently as we could, I said to those two young men: 'Although I was angry with you for dealing childishly with great matters, yet it seems to me to have happened not without a favorable order, since in the discourse by which I was drawing you back from that levity, the time was so consumed that so great a matter seems to have been postponed to Alypius' arrival. Wherefore, since I have now made the question well known to him and have shown how far we advanced in it, are you prepared, Licentius, to defend the cause you undertook out of that definition of yours?'
45:71
nam meminisse me arbitror te ordinem esse dixisse, per quem deus ageret omnia. — Paratus sum, inquit, quantum ualeo. — Quomodo ergo, inquam, agit ordine omnia deus? itane, ut etiam se ordine agat? an praeter eum ordine ab eo cetera gubernantur? — Ubi omnia bona sunt, inquit, ordo non est. est enim summa aequalitas, quae ordinem nihil desiderat. — Negas, inquam, apud deum omnia bona esse? — Non nego, inquit. — Conficitur, inquam, neque deum neque illa, quae apud deum sunt, ordine administrari. — Concedebat. — Numquidnam, inquam, omnia bona nihil tibi uidentur esse ? — Immo, ait, ipsa uere sunt.
因為我想我記得,你曾說「秩序」就是神藉以行一切事的那個東西。——「我準備好了,」他說,「就我所能而言。」——「那麼,」我說,「神是怎樣藉秩序行一切事的呢?是連祂自己也藉秩序而行嗎?還是說,除祂自己以外,其餘萬物才由祂藉秩序而受治理?」——「凡一切皆善之處,」他說,「便沒有秩序。因為那裡有至高的均等,它無需任何秩序。」——「你是否否認,」我說,「在神那裡一切皆善?」——「我不否認,」他說。——「那麼結論就是,」我說,「無論神、還是那些與神同在的事物,都不是藉秩序而受管理的。」——他表示同意。——「難道說,」我問,「一切善的事物在你看來竟是虛無嗎?」——「恰恰相反,」他說,「那些事物才是真正實存的。」
For I think I remember that you said order is that through which God does all things. — 'I am prepared,' he said, 'as far as I am able.' — 'How then,' I said, 'does God do all things by order? In such a way that he does even himself by order? Or, apart from himself, are the rest of things governed by him through order?' — 'Where all things are good,' he said, 'there is no order. For there is the highest equality, which desires no order.' — 'Do you deny,' I said, 'that with God all things are good?' — 'I do not deny it,' he said. — 'It is concluded, then,' I said, 'that neither God nor those things which are with God are administered by order.' — He conceded it. — 'Surely,' I said, 'do all good things seem to you to be nothing?' — 'On the contrary,' he said, 'those very things truly are.'
45:72
— Ubi ergo est, inquam, illud tuum, quod dixisti, omnia quae sunt ordine administrari nihilque omnino esse, quod ab ordine separatum sit? — Sed sunt, inquit, etiam mala, per quae factum est, ut et bona ordo concludat; nam sola bona non ordine reguntur sed simul bona et mala. cum autem dicimus: \'omnia quae sunt\', non sola utique bona dicimus. ex quo fit, ut omnia simul, quae deus administrat, ordine administrentur. Cui ego: Quae administrantur et aguntur, uidentur tibi moueri an immobilia putas esse? — Ista, inquit, quae in hoc mundo fiunt, fateor moueri. — Reliqua, inquam, negas ? — Quae sunt cum deo, inquit, non mouentur; reliqua omnia moueri arbitror.
「那麼,」我說,「你那句話——凡實存的都藉秩序而受管理,並且絕沒有什麼是脫離秩序的——如今何在呢?」——「可是,」他說,「也存在著惡,正是藉著惡,秩序才得以連善一併包羅;因為善並非單獨受秩序統管,而是善與惡一同受管。而當我們說『凡實存的一切』時,我們所指的絕非單單是善。由此便得出:凡神所管理的一切事物一併都是藉秩序而受管理的。」我對他說:「那些受管理、被實行的事物——在你看來是在動的呢,還是你認為它們是不動的?」——「那些,」他說,「在這世界中生成的事物,我承認是在動的。」——「其餘的呢,」我說,「你是否否認?」——「那些與神同在的,」他說,「並不動;其餘一切,我判斷都在動。」
'Where then,' I said, 'is that saying of yours, that all things which are, are administered by order, and that there is nothing at all which is separated from order?' — 'But there are,' he said, 'also evils, through which it has come about that order should embrace goods as well; for goods alone are not ruled by order, but goods and evils together. Now when we say "all things that are," we surely do not mean goods alone. Whence it comes about that all things together which God administers are administered by order.' To him I said: 'The things which are administered and done — do they seem to you to be moved, or do you think them immovable?' — 'Those things,' he said, 'which come to be in this world, I admit are moved.' — 'The rest,' I said, 'do you deny it?' — 'Those which are with God,' he said, 'are not moved; all the rest I judge to be moved.'
45:73
— Cum igitur ea, quae cum deo sunt, inquam, non moueri putaş, cetera autem concedis moueri, ostendis omnia, quae mouentur, non esse cum deo. — Repete hoc ipsum, inquit, paulo planius. — Quod non mihi uisus est difficultate intellegendi fieri uoluisse, sed quaerendi spatium, quo inueniret quid responderet. — Dixisti, inquam, ea quae cum deo sunt non moueri. cetera autem moueri. si ergo haec, quae mouentur, non mouerentur, si essent cum deo, quoniam omnia, quae sunt cum deo, negas moueri, restat, ut praeter deum sint quae mouentur. — Quibus dictis adhuc tacebat, cum tandem: Uidetur mihi, inquit, quod et in hoc mundo si qua non mouentur, cum deo sunt. — Nihil hoc ad me, inquam;
「那麼,」我說,「既然你認為那些與神同在的事物並不動,而你又承認其餘的都在動,你便顯明了:凡動的事物都不與神同在。」——「請把這一點,」他說,「再稍微清楚地重述一遍。」——在我看來,他這樣要求並非出於理解上的困難,而是要爭取思考的空間,好在其中尋出如何作答。——「你說過,」我說,「那些與神同在的事物並不動,而其餘的都在動。那麼,倘若這些在動的事物,若與神同在便不會動——因為你否認凡與神同在的都會動——那結論便是:凡在動的事物都在神之外。」——說了這些之後,他仍然沉默,直到終於說:「在我看來,就是在這世界中,若有什麼不動的,也是與神同在的。」——「這與我的論點無關,」我說;
'Since therefore,' I said, 'you think that those things which are with God are not moved, but you grant that the rest are moved, you show that all things which are moved are not with God.' — 'Repeat this very point,' he said, 'a little more plainly.' — And this, it seemed to me, he wished not from any difficulty of understanding, but to gain a space for inquiry in which he might find what to answer. — 'You said,' I said, 'that those things which are with God are not moved, but that the rest are moved. If therefore these things which are moved would not be moved if they were with God — since you deny that all things which are with God are moved — it remains that the things which are moved are apart from God.' — When these things had been said, he still kept silent, until at last: 'It seems to me,' he said, 'that in this world too, if any things are not moved, they are with God.' — 'This is nothing to my point,' I said;
45:74
fateris enim, ut opinor, non omnia, quae in hoc mundo sunt, non moueri. ex quo conficitur non omnia mundi huius esse cum deo. — Fateor, inquit, non omnia. — Ergo est aliquid sine deo ? — Non, inquit. — Cum deo sunt igitur omnia. — Hic cunctabundus: Quaeso, inquit, illud non dixerim, quod sine deo nihil sit; nam prorsus omnia, quae mouentur, non mihi uidentur esse cum deo. — Sine deo est, inquam, igitur caelum hoc, quod moueri nemo ambigit. — Non est, inquit, sine deo caelum. — Ergo est aliquid cum deo, quod moueatur ? — Non possum, inquit, ut uolo, explicare quod sentio; tamen quid moliar dicere, peto, ut non exspectatis uerbis meis sagacissime, si potestis, intellegatis.
「因為據我看,你承認並非這世界中的一切都是不動的。由此便得出:並非這世界的一切都與神同在。」——「我承認,」他說,「並非一切都是。」——「那麼有什麼是在神之外的嗎?」——「沒有,」他說。——「那麼一切都與神同在了。」——這時他猶豫著說:「我懇求,我剛才那句『沒有什麼是在神之外』或許不該說;因為凡在動的事物,在我看來根本不與神同在。」——「那麼,」我說,「這片沒有人懷疑它在動的天,便是在神之外的了。」——「天並非在神之外,」他說。——「那麼有某物與神同在而又在動的嗎?」——「我無法,」他說,「照我所願把我所感受的說清楚;然而我所竭力要說的,我懇求你們不必等我把話說完,就盡你們的敏銳,若能夠的話,把它領會過來。」
'for you confess, as I suppose, that not all things which are in this world are unmoved. Whence it is concluded that not all things of this world are with God.' — 'I confess,' he said, 'that not all are.' — 'Therefore is there anything without God?' — 'No,' he said. — 'Then all things are with God.' — Here, hesitating, he said: 'I beg that I may not have said that without God there is nothing; for it does not seem to me at all that things which are moved are with God.' — 'Then,' I said, 'this heaven, which no one doubts is moved, is without God.' — 'Heaven is not without God,' he said. — 'Then there is something with God which is moved?' — 'I cannot,' he said, 'as I wish, explain what I feel; yet what I am striving to say I beg that, without waiting for my words, you may most shrewdly understand, if you can.'
45:75
nam et sine deo mihi nihil uidetur esse et, quod cum deo est, rursum uidetur inconcussum manere; caelum autem-dicere sine deo esse non possum, non solum quod nihil sine deo esse arbitror sed quod caelum putem habere aliquid, quod non mouetur, quod uero aut deus est aut cum deo, quamuis ipsum caelum non dubitem uerti ac moueri. Defini ergo, inquam, si placet, quid sit esse cum deo et quid sit non esse sine deo. si enim de uerbis inter nos controuersia est, facile contemnetur, dummodo rem ipsam, quam concepisti mente, uideamus. — Odi ego, inquit, definire. — Quid ergo faciemus ? inquam. — Tu, inquit, defini quaeso.
「因為在我看來,一方面沒有什麼是在神之外的,另一方面那與神同在的又似乎始終不受動搖地存留;然而我卻不能說天是在神之外的——不僅因為我判斷沒有什麼是在神之外的,更因為我認為天有某種不動的東西,這東西或是神、或是與神同在的,儘管我並不懷疑天本身是被旋轉、被推動的。」——「那麼,」我說,「請你界定一下,何謂『與神同在』,何謂『並非在神之外』。因為倘若我們之間的爭論只在於用詞,那便容易置之不理,只要我們看清你心中所構想的那件事本身。」——「我厭惡,」他說,「下定義。」——「那我們該怎麼辦呢?」我說。——「你,」他說,「請你來下定義。」
'For both nothing seems to me to be without God, and that which is with God seems in turn to remain unshaken; yet I cannot say that heaven is without God — not only because I judge that nothing is without God, but because I think that heaven has something which is not moved, something which is either God or is with God, although I do not doubt that heaven itself is turned and moved.' — 'Define then,' I said, 'if you please, what it is to be with God and what it is not to be without God. For if the controversy between us is about words, it will easily be despised, provided we see the very thing which you have conceived in your mind.' — 'I hate,' he said, 'to define.' — 'What then shall we do?' I said. — 'You,' he said, 'define, I beg.'
45:76
nam facilius est mihi uidere in alterius definitione, quid non probem, quam quicquam bene definiendo explicare. — Geram tibi morem, inquam. uidetur tibi id esse cum deo, quod ab eo regitur atque administratur ? — Non, ait ille, hoc animo conceperam, cum dicebam ea quae non mouentur esse cum deo. — Uide ergo, inquam, utrum haec tibi saltem definitio placeat: cum deo est quidquid intellegit deum. — Concedo, inquit. — Quid ergo ? inquam; sapiens deum tibi intellegere non uidetur? — Uidetur, inquit. — Cum ergo sapientes non solum in una domo aut urbe sed etiam per inmensa regionum peregrinando nauigandoque moueantur, quomodo erit uerum quidquid cum deo est non moueri?
「因為在別人的定義裡看出我所不贊同之處,對我而言比藉著好好下定義來闡明任何事都更容易。」——「我就順著你,」我說。「在你看來,凡受神統治、受神管理的,就是與神同在的嗎?」——「當我說『不動的事物與神同在』時,」他說,「我心中所構想的並不是這個。」——「那麼你看,」我說,「至少這個定義是否使你滿意:凡理解神的,便是與神同在的。」——「我同意,」他說。——「那麼怎樣呢?」我說,「難道智者在你看來不理解神嗎?」——「他確實理解,」他說。——「那麼,既然智者不僅在一所房屋或一座城中活動,甚至還藉著旅行與航海橫越廣袤的地域而遷移,那麼『凡與神同在的都不動』這話又怎能為真呢?」
'For it is easier for me to see in another's definition what I do not approve, than to explain anything by defining it well.' — 'I will humor you,' I said. 'Does it seem to you that that is with God which is ruled and administered by him?' — 'That is not,' said he, 'what I had conceived in my mind when I said that things which are not moved are with God.' — 'See then,' I said, 'whether at least this definition pleases you: that is with God which understands God.' — 'I grant it,' he said. — 'What then?' I said; 'does the wise man not seem to you to understand God?' — 'He does seem to,' he said. — 'Since therefore wise men are moved not only within one house or city, but even by traveling and voyaging through immense stretches of regions, how will it be true that whatever is with God is not moved?'
← 上一段下一段 →
← 第 44 章第 46 章 →
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。