📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 書信與論戰集(CSEL)

希波的奧古斯丁

書信與論戰集(CSEL) 第 5 章 第 55/118 段

拉丁文原文.38 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 5:2155–5:2192(全章共 4615 節)

← 第 4 章第 6 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
5:2155
et cum ab ista cogitatione eum sanctorum ad deum pertinentium reuocaret auctoritas, suscepit atque intendit agnoscere tam grande secretum, quod ei laboranti non patefactum est, donec intraret in sanctuarium dei et intellegeret in nouissima, hoc est donec accepto spiritu sancto disceret desiderare potiora et prospiceret, quae poena futura sit impiis, etiam qui faenea quadam temporaliter felicitate floruissent. hunc psalmum septuagesimum et secundum nocte, qua inlucescebat sollemnitas beatissimi Cypriani, per ministerium nostrum expositum lege et diligenter aduerte.
當那些屬神之聖徒的權威將他從那思想中喚回,他便著手並定意去認明如此重大的奧祕——這奧祕在他勞苦之時並未向他揭示,直到他進了神的聖所,思想他們的結局;就是說,直到他領受了聖靈,學會渴慕更美之物,並瞻望那將臨到不敬虔者身上的刑罰,甚至臨到那些曾在某種如乾草般的福樂中暫時興盛之人。這第七十二篇詩篇,是在至有福的居普良(Cyprian)之節期破曉之夜,藉我們的職事所闡明的,請你誦讀並殷勤留意。
And when the authority of the saints who belong to God recalled him from that thought, he undertook and set his mind to recognize so great a secret — which was not disclosed to him as he labored, until he entered into the sanctuary of God and understood concerning the last things; that is, until, having received the Holy Spirit, he learned to desire the better things and looked ahead to what punishment was to come upon the impious, even those who had flourished for a time in a certain hay-like felicity. Read this seventy-second Psalm, expounded through our ministry on the night on which the solemnity of the most blessed Cyprian was dawning, and attend to it diligently.
5:2156
Proinde homo Christus idemque deus Christus, cuius misericordissima humanitate atque in cuius forma seruili discere deberemus, quid in hac uita contemnendum et quid in alia sperandum esset, in ipsa passione, in qua sibi eius inimici magni uictoresque uidebantur, suscepit uocem infirmitatis nostrae, qua simul crucifigebatur uetus homo noster, ut euacuaretur corpus peccati, et dixit: Deus, deus meus, ut quid me dereliquisti? et hoc unum de quinque propositis tuis. sic incipit psalmus uicesimus et primus, qui de passione ipsius et reuelatione gratiae, quam fidelibus faciendis liberandisque adtulit, in prophetia tanto ante cantatus est.
因此,那人基督與這同一位神基督——藉祂最施憐憫的人性、在祂奴僕的形像中,我們當學會在此生當輕看什麼、在來生當指望什麼——就在那受難之中,祂的仇敵以為他們自己偉大並勝過了祂,祂卻取了我們軟弱的聲音,藉此我們的舊人與祂一同被釘十字架,好使罪身滅絕,並且說:「神,我的神,你為什麼離棄我?」這正是你所提出的五個問題之一。第二十一篇詩篇如此開頭,這篇是在如此久遠之前,藉先知論到祂的受難、以及祂為要造就並釋放信徒所帶來之恩典的顯明而被歌唱的。
Accordingly, Christ the man and the same Christ God — by whose most merciful humanity and in whose servile form we ought to learn what is to be despised in this life and what to be hoped for in the other — in the very passion, in which He seemed to His enemies to be great and victorious over Him, took up the voice of our infirmity, by which our old man was together crucified, that the body of sin might be done away, and said: 'God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?' And this is one of your five proposed questions. So begins the twenty-first Psalm, which was sung in prophecy so long beforehand concerning His passion and the revelation of the grace which He brought to make and to free the faithful.
5:2157
Proinde eundem psalmum, cuius prophetiam dominus ad se pertinere demonstrans primum uersum eius exclamauit, cum penderet in ligno, commemorando exponendoque percurram, ut ex hoc intellegas, quem ad modum gratia testamenti noui nec eo tempore tacebatur, quando in uetere uelabatur. dicitur enim ex persona Christi, quod ad formam serui adtinet, in qua nostra portabatur irfirmitas. dixit enim de illo et Esaias: Ille infirmitates nostras portat et pro nobis in doloribus est. ex huius igitur infirmitatis uoce, de qua Paulus in eo. quod petebat, non exauditus et ideo quodam modo derelictus audit tamen a domino: Sufficit tibi gratia mea;
因此,我要通篇貫穿這同一篇詩篇——主既顯明它的預言是關乎祂自己的,就在祂懸掛於木頭上時呼喊出它的第一節——加以複述並闡明,好叫你從此明白,新約的恩典即使在那被舊約遮蔽的時候,也未曾被緘默略過。因為這是從基督的位格所說的,就其關乎奴僕的形像而言,在那形像中我們的軟弱被擔負。因為以賽亞也論到祂說:「祂擔當我們的軟弱,為我們在憂患中。」故此,從這軟弱的聲音——就是保羅在他所求的事上不蒙應允、因而在某種意義上被撇棄,卻仍從主聽見「我的恩典夠你用的」——
Accordingly, I shall run through this same Psalm — whose prophecy the Lord, showing it to pertain to Himself, cried out its first verse while He hung upon the wood — recounting and expounding it, so that from this you may understand in what manner the grace of the New Testament was not passed over in silence even at that time when it was veiled in the Old. For it is spoken from the person of Christ, so far as it pertains to the form of the servant, in which our infirmity was borne. For Isaiah also said of Him: 'He bears our infirmities and is in sorrows for us.' From the voice, then, of this infirmity — concerning which Paul, in what he asked, was not heard, and therefore in a certain manner forsaken, yet nonetheless hears from the Lord: 'My grace is sufficient for thee;
5:2158
nam uirtus in infirmitate perficitur, ex uoce ergo huius infirmitatis nostrae, quam in se transfigurauit caput nostrum, dicitur in hoc psalmo: Deus, deus meus, respice me: quare me dereliquisti? in eo quippe derelinquitur deprecans, in quo non exauditur. hanc in se uocem transfigurauit Iesus, uocem scilicet corporis sui, hoc est ecclesiae suae a uetere homine in nouum hominem reformandae, uocem scilicet infirmitatis humanae, cui deneganda fuerant bona ueteris testamenti, ut bona noui testamenti optare atque sperare iam disceret.
「因為我的能力是在人的軟弱上顯得完全」——故此,從我們這軟弱的聲音——就是我們的元首變化納入祂自己的聲音——在這篇詩篇中說道:「神,我的神,求你眷顧我:你為什麼離棄我?」因為在他不蒙應允之事上,那祈求者便被撇棄。這聲音耶穌變化納入祂自己——就是祂身體的聲音,即祂教會的聲音,這教會要從舊人被更新為新人;就是人性軟弱的聲音,這軟弱必須被拒絕舊約之諸善,好使它如今學會渴慕並指望新約之諸善。
for strength is made perfect in weakness' — from the voice, then, of this our infirmity, which our Head transfigured into Himself, it is said in this Psalm: 'God, my God, look upon me: why hast thou forsaken me?' For in that in which he is not heard, the one praying is forsaken. This voice Jesus transfigured into Himself — namely, the voice of His body, that is, of His Church, which was to be reformed from the old man into the new man; the voice, namely, of human infirmity, from which the goods of the Old Testament had to be denied, so that it might now learn to desire and hope for the goods of the New Testament.
5:2159
In illis autem ueteris testamenti bonis ad ueterem hominem pertinentibus praecipue concupiscitur uitae huius productio temporalis, ut aliquanto diutius teneatur, quia semper non potest. ideo mortis diem omnes quidem adfuturum sciunt et eum tamen omnes aut paene omnes differre conantur, etiam qui post mortem se beatius credunt esse uicturos; tantam habet uim carnis et animae dulce consortium. nemo enim umquam carnem suam. odio habuit et propterea non uult anima uel ad tempus ab eius etiam infirmitate discedere, quamuis eam se sine infirmitate in aeternum recepturam esse confidat.
但在舊約那些關乎舊人的諸善之中,人所尤其貪戀的乃是今生在時間上的延長,好使它能被多保留些時日,因為它不能永遠被保留。故此,眾人固然都知道死亡的日子必將來到,然而眾人、或幾乎眾人,都設法拖延它——甚至那些相信自己死後將更蒙福地活著的人也如此;肉體與靈魂之甜美相伴,其力量竟如此之大。因為從來沒有人恨惡自己的肉體,正因此故,靈魂不願離開它、哪怕是暫時的,甚至不願離開它的軟弱,儘管它深信自己必再領受那脫離軟弱、直到永遠的肉體。
But among those goods of the Old Testament pertaining to the old man, what is chiefly coveted is the temporal prolongation of this life, that it may be held somewhat longer, since it cannot be held forever. Therefore all men indeed know that the day of death will come, and yet all, or almost all, try to defer it — even those who believe that after death they will live more blessedly; so great a power has the sweet fellowship of flesh and soul. For no one ever hated his own flesh, and for that reason the soul does not wish to depart, even for a time, even from its infirmity, although it is confident that it will receive that flesh again without infirmity forever.
5:2160
proinde mente seruiens legi dei carne autem trahens desideria peccati, quibus oboedire uetat apostolus, mentis quidem ratione concupiscit homo pius dissolui et esse cum Christo, sed id sensu carnis recusat et refugit et, si fieri possit, non uult expoliari sed superuestiri, ut absorbeatur mortale a uita, id est ut ab infirmitate ad inmortalitatem etiam ipsum corpus sine morte media transferatur. Sed haec uerba, quibus humanus dies et uitae huius prolixitas concupiscitur, uerba sunt delictorum et longe sunt ab ea salute, cuius nondum rem sed iam spem gerimus, de qua scriptum est, quia spe salui facti sumus; spes autem quae uidetur, non est spes. ideoque et in isto psalmo cum dixisset:
因此,人以心思服事神的律法,卻以肉體牽引罪的私慾——使徒禁止我們順從這些私慾——虔敬之人固然憑心思的理性渴望離世與基督同在,卻憑肉體的感官拒絕並逃避這事;倘若可能,他不願脫下,反願穿上,好叫這必死的被生命吞滅,就是叫他的身體也能不經中間的死亡,從軟弱被遷入不朽。但這些渴求人間歲月與今生綿長的話語,乃是過犯的話語,遠離那救恩;那救恩我們尚未得著其實體,卻已懷有其盼望;正如經上所記:我們得救是在乎盼望;只是所見的盼望不是盼望。因此在這篇詩篇裡,當他說了:
Accordingly, serving the law of God with the mind, yet drawing after the desires of sin with the flesh — desires which the Apostle forbids us to obey — the godly man indeed by the reasoning of his mind longs to be dissolved and to be with Christ; but by the sense of the flesh he refuses and shrinks from this, and, if it might be so, wishes not to be unclothed but rather to be clothed upon, that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life — that is, that even his very body may be carried over from weakness to immortality without any intervening death. But these words, by which a human span of days and the length of this present life are craved, are the words of transgressions, and they are far from that salvation whose substance we do not yet possess, though we already hold its hope; of which it is written that by hope we were saved; but hope that is seen is not hope. And therefore in this psalm too, when he had said:
5:2161
Deus, deus meus, respice me; quare me dereliquisti? continuo subiungit: Longe a salute mea uerba delictorum meorum, id est haec uerba delictorum meorum sunt et longe sunt ab illa salute mea, quam mihi non ueteris sed noui testamenti gratia pollicetur. quamquam etiam sic distingui potest: Deus, deus meus, respice me; quare me dereliquisti longe a salute mea? tamquam diceret: Relinquendo me, hoc est non me exaudiendo longe factus es a salute mea praesenti scilicet salute huius uitae, ut alius sensus sit \'uerba delictorum meorum\', id est ista, quae dixi, uerba sunt delictorum, quia uerba sunt carnalium desideriorum. Haec Christus ex persona sui corporis dicit, quod est ecclesia;
『我的神,我的神,求你眷顧我;為甚麼離棄我?』他隨即接著說:『我罪過的話語遠離我的救恩』,就是說:這些是我罪過的話語,遠離那救恩,那救恩不是憑舊約、乃是憑新約的恩典所應許我的。不過也可以這樣斷句:『我的神,我的神,求你眷顧我;為甚麼離棄我,遠離我的救恩?』彷彿他說:你離棄我,就是不垂聽我,便遠離了我的救恩,即今生現世的救恩;如此另一種意思便是『我罪過的話語』,就是我所說的這些是過犯的話語,因為是肉體私慾的話語。基督是以祂身體的位格說這些話,這身體就是教會;
'My God, my God, look upon me; why hast thou forsaken me?' he at once adds: 'Far from my salvation are the words of my transgressions' — that is, these are the words of my transgressions, and they are far from that salvation of mine which is promised me not by the grace of the old but of the new testament. And yet it can also be punctuated thus: 'My God, my God, look upon me; why hast thou forsaken me, far from my salvation?' as though he said: In forsaking me — that is, in not hearing me — thou hast become far from my salvation, namely the present salvation of this life; so that the other sense would be: 'the words of my transgressions' — that is, these things I have said are the words of transgressions, because they are the words of carnal desires. These things Christ speaks in the person of his body, which is the Church;
5:2162
haec ex persona dicit infirmitatis carnis peccati, quam transfigurauit in eam, quam sumpsit ex uirgine. similitudinem carnis peccati; haec sponsus ex persona sponsae loquitur, quia uniuit eam sibi quodam modo. et apud Esaiam, ubi dicit: Sicut sponso alligauit mihi mitram et sicut sponsam ornauit me ornamento, \'alligauit mihi\' et \'ornauit me\' tamquam unius uox est et tamen sponsum et sponsam Christum intellegimus et ecclesiam. sed erunt duo in carne una. sacramentum magnum, dixit apostolus, in Christo et in ecclesia; igitur non iam duo sed una caro. si ergo caro una, profecto competenter etiam uox una. quid hic quaeris, humana infirmitas, uocem uerbi, per quod facta sunt omnia?
祂是以罪之肉體軟弱的位格說這些話,祂將這軟弱轉化為祂從童貞女所取的、罪身的樣式;這是新郎以新婦的位格所說,因為祂以某種方式將新婦與自己聯合。在以賽亞書中,祂說:『祂為我戴上冠冕如新郎,又以裝飾妝飾我如新婦』——『祂為我戴上』與『祂妝飾我』彷彿是同一人的聲音,然而我們卻明白新郎與新婦乃是基督與教會。『但二人要成為一體。這是極大的奧祕,』使徒說,『是指著基督和教會說的。』所以如今不再是二,乃是一體。既是一體,那聲音理當也是一。人的軟弱啊,你在此為何尋求那藉以造成萬物之道的聲音呢?
these he speaks in the person of the weakness of sinful flesh, which he transfigured into that which he took from the Virgin — the likeness of sinful flesh; these the Bridegroom speaks in the person of the Bride, because in a certain manner he has united her to himself. And in Isaiah, where he says: 'As on a bridegroom he set a mitre upon me, and as a bride he adorned me with ornament' — 'he set upon me' and 'he adorned me' are as it were the voice of one, and yet by the Bridegroom and the Bride we understand Christ and the Church. 'But they shall be two in one flesh. This is a great sacrament,' said the Apostle, 'in Christ and in the Church.' Therefore now they are not two but one flesh. If then the flesh is one, surely fittingly the voice too is one. Why here dost thou seek, O human weakness, the voice of the Word by whom all things were made?
5:2163
audi potius uocem carnis, quae facta est inter omnia, quoniam uerbum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis; audi potius medicinae uocem, qua sanaris, ut uideas deum, quem tibi uidendum distulit, hominem autem uidendum adtulit, occidendum obtulit, imitandum contulit, credendum transtulit, ut ista fide ad uidendum deum mentis oculus sanaretur. quid ergo dedignamur audire uocem corporis ex ore capitis? ecclesia in illo patiebatur, quando pro ecclesia patiebatur, sicut etiam ipse in ecclesia patiebatur, quando pro illo ecclesia patiebatur. nam sicut audiuimus ecclesiae uocem in Christo patientis: Deus, deus meus, respice me; quare me dereliquisti?
你倒要聽那在萬物中被造之肉體的聲音,因為道成了肉身,住在我們中間;你倒要聽那使你得醫治之良藥的聲音,好叫你得見神——祂將見神之事為你延後,卻將可見的人性呈給你看,獻出來被殺,賜下來被效法,交付出來被信,好叫你藉這信心,心眼得醫而能見神。那麼,我們為何不屑從元首的口中聽那身體的聲音呢?教會在祂裡面受苦,因祂為教會受苦;正如祂也在教會裡受苦,因教會為祂受苦。我們既聽見教會在基督裡受苦的聲音:『我的神,我的神,求你眷顧我;為甚麼離棄我?』
Hear rather the voice of the flesh which was made among all things, since the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us; hear rather the voice of the medicine by which thou art healed, that thou mayest see God, whom he deferred for thee to see, but presented as man to be seen, offered to be slain, bestowed to be imitated, delivered to be believed, so that by this faith the eye of the mind might be healed to see God. Why then do we disdain to hear the voice of the body from the mouth of the Head? The Church suffered in him when he suffered for the Church, just as he too suffered in the Church when the Church suffered for him. For as we have heard the voice of the Church suffering in Christ: 'My God, my God, look upon me; why hast thou forsaken me?'
5:2164
sic audiuimus etiam Christi uocem in ecclesia patientis: Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris? Cum itaque non exaudimur ad temporalia bona retinenda uel adipiscenda, quando pro his deprecamur deum, in eo, quod nos non exaudit, derelinquit nos; sed ad potiora, quae uult, ut intellegamus et praeferamus et concupiscamus, non nos derelinquit. unde sequitur psalmus et dicit: Clamaui ad te per diem nec exaudies et nocteetiam hic subauditur nec exaudies\' —: sed uide\\ quid adiungit: et non ad insipientiam mihi. hoc ergo dicit: Non me quidem exaudies clamantem per diem, id est in rebus prosperis. ut eas non amittam, et nocte, id est in rebus aduersis.
照樣我們也聽見基督在教會裡受苦的聲音:『掃羅,掃羅,你為甚麼逼迫我?』所以,當我們為保有或得著現世好處而祈求神,卻不蒙垂聽時,祂在不垂聽這件事上便是離棄了我們;然而在祂願我們明白、看重並渴慕的那更美之事上,祂並未離棄我們。因此詩篇接著說:『我白日呼求,你不應允』——這裡也可補上『你不應允』——『黑夜也是如此』;但看祂所加的:『卻不算為我的愚昧。』祂的意思是:你固然不應允我白日的呼求,就是在順境中,求你不叫我失去它;也不應允我黑夜的呼求,就是在逆境中,
so also have we heard the voice of Christ suffering in the Church: 'Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?' Therefore when we are not heard as to retaining or obtaining temporal goods, when we beseech God for these, in the very fact that he does not hear us he forsakes us; yet as to those better things which he wills us to understand and prefer and desire, he does not forsake us. Whence the psalm continues and says: 'I cried unto thee by day, and thou wilt not hear' — and here too is understood 'and thou wilt not hear' — 'and by night'; but see what he adds: 'and not unto folly for me.' This then he says: Thou wilt indeed not hear me crying by day, that is, in prosperous things, that I may not lose them, and by night, that is, in adverse things,
5:2165
ut prospera, quae amissa sunt, redeant, uerum hoc non mihi ad insipientiam facies, sed potius ut sapiam, quid iam per noui testamenti gratiam a te eipectare, quid desiderare. quid poscere debeam. clamo quippe ego, ut mihi bona temporalia non auferantur, tu autem in sancto habitas, laus Israhel. nolo, ut derelinquas concupiscentiam meam, qua carnalem felicitatem requiro; uerum haec est in sordibus uetustatis, tu autem quaeris munditiam nouitatis; non exaudiendo istam cupiditatem relinquis, quia caritatem, in qua habites, quaeris; caritas autem dei diffunditur in cordibus nostris sed per spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis.
求那失去的順境能歸還;但這事你不會作成我的愚昧,倒要叫我知道,如今藉新約的恩典,我當向你期望甚麼、渴慕甚麼、祈求甚麼。我固然呼求,求現世好處不從我奪去,但你卻住在聖所,是以色列的讚美。我不願你離棄我肉體的私慾,就是我藉以尋求肉體之福的私慾;然而這私慾在舊人的污穢中,你卻尋求新人的潔淨;你不應允那私慾,便是離棄了它,因為你尋求那可供你居住的愛;神的愛藉著所賜給我們的聖靈,澆灌在我們心裡。
that the prosperous things which have been lost may return; but this thou wilt not do unto folly for me, but rather that I may know what now, through the grace of the new testament, I ought to expect from thee, what to desire, what to ask. For I indeed cry that temporal goods may not be taken from me; but thou dwellest in the holy place, the praise of Israel. I would not have thee forsake my concupiscence, by which I seek carnal felicity; but this lies in the filth of the old, while thou seekest the cleanness of the new; by not hearing that desire thou dost forsake it, because thou seekest the charity in which thou mayest dwell; and the charity of God is shed abroad in our hearts, but by the Holy Spirit, who is given unto us.
5:2166
ideo in sancto habitas, laus Israhel, laus uidentium te, quia non in se laudantur sed in te; quid enim habent, quod non acceperunt, ut, qui gloriatur, in domino glorietur? Haec est gratia testamenti noui. nam in uetere testamento quando commendabas nonnisi a te peti sperarique debere etiam ipsam terrenam temporalemque felicitatem, in te sperauerunt patres nostri, sperauerunt et eruisti eos; ad te clamauerunt et salui facti sunt; in te sperauerunt et non sunt confusi. illos quippe patres inter inimicos suos uiuentes et diuitiis implesti et ab hostibus eruisti gloriosasque uictorias\' reportare fecisti et de diuersis eos mortibus liberasti. pro alio subiecisti, ne feriretur, arietem;
因此你住在聖所,是以色列的讚美,是那些見你之人的讚美,因為他們不是在自己裡面、乃是在你裡面得讚美;他們有甚麼不是領受的呢?以致誇口的當指著主誇口。這就是新約的恩典。因為在舊約,當你吩咐連地上短暫之福也當單單向你尋求並仰望時:『我們的列祖倚靠你;他們倚靠你,你便解救他們;他們哀求你,便蒙拯救;他們倚靠你,就不至羞愧。』因為你使那些列祖在仇敵中生活,既以財富充滿他們,又從敵人手中解救他們,使他們奏凱得勝,並從各樣死亡中釋放他們。你以一隻公羊代替一人,免得他被殺;
Therefore thou dwellest in the holy place, the praise of Israel, the praise of those who see thee, because they are praised not in themselves but in thee; for what have they that they have not received, so that he that glorieth may glory in the Lord? This is the grace of the new testament. For in the old testament, when thou didst enjoin that even earthly and temporal felicity itself ought to be sought and hoped for from none but thee: 'Our fathers hoped in thee; they hoped, and thou didst deliver them; they cried unto thee and were saved; they hoped in thee and were not confounded.' For those fathers, living among their enemies, thou didst both fill with riches and deliver from their foes, and didst make them bear off glorious victories, and didst free them from divers deaths. For one thou didst substitute a ram, that he might not be smitten;
5:2167
alium de putredine sanum et ei dupla, quae amiserat, reddidisti; alium inter leones esurientes inlaesum integrumque seruasti; aliorum inter flammas deambulantium grata uoce laudatus es. tale aliquid in Christo expectabant fieri Iudaei, unde probarent, si uere filius dei esset. ex eorum persona et in libro sapientiae dicitur: Morte turpissima condemnemus eum; erit enim respectus in sermonibus ipsius. si enim uerus filius dei est. suscipiet eum et liberabit eum de manibus contrariorum. haec, inquit, cogitauerunt et errauerunt; excaecauit enim eos malitia eorum.
你使另一人從腐爛中得痊癒,並將他所失去的加倍還給他;你使另一人在飢餓的獅子中安然無恙;藉著另一些在火焰中行走的人,你被那悅耳的聲音所讚美。猶太人指望在基督身上發生某種類似的事,好藉此證明祂是否真是神的兒子。他們的心思也在《智慧書》中被記述:『我們用極羞辱的死定他的罪;因為必有人顧念他的話。他若真是神的兒子,神必搭救他,救他脫離敵對者的手。』經上說:『他們如此思想,卻是錯了;因為他們自己的惡毒使他們瞎了眼。』
another thou didst make whole from putrefaction, and didst render him double what he had lost; another thou didst keep unharmed and untouched among hungry lions; by others walking amid the flames thou wast praised with a pleasing voice. Some such thing the Jews expected to happen in Christ, whereby they might prove whether he were truly the Son of God. In their person it is said also in the book of Wisdom: 'Let us condemn him to a most shameful death; for there shall be respect had unto his words. For if he be the true Son of God, he will receive him and deliver him from the hands of his adversaries. These things,' it says, 'they thought, and erred; for their own malice blinded them.'
5:2168
adtendentes quippe tempus ueteris testamenti et illam patrum etiam temporalem felicitatem, in qua illis exhibenda demonstrauit deus etiam talia dona sua esse, non uiderunt iam esse tempus, quo reuelaretur in Christo bona aeterna proprie deum praestare iustis, qui bona temporalia praestat et impiis. Denique cum dixisset: In te sperauerunt patres nostri, sperauerunt et eruisti eos; ad te clamauerunt et salui facti sunt; in te sperauerunt et non sunt confusi, uide, quid adiunxerit: Ego autem sum uermis et non homo. quod uidetur quidem ad commendandam humilitatem simpliciter dictum. ut se in oculis persequentium abiectissimum quiddam et contemptissimum demonstraret;
因為他們只顧念舊約的時代,以及列祖那甚至是現世的福分——在其中神顯明連這樣的恩賜也是要賜給他們的——卻沒有看見如今乃是要在基督裡顯明的時代:神本是把永恆的美善賜給義人,雖然祂也把現世的好處賜給惡人。所以當他說了『我們的列祖倚靠你;他們倚靠你,你便解救他們;他們哀求你,便蒙拯救;他們倚靠你,就不至羞愧』之後,看他所加的:『但我是蟲,不是人。』這固然彷彿只是為推崇謙卑而說,好叫祂在逼迫者眼中顯為極其卑賤、極受藐視的;
For attending to the time of the old testament and to that even temporal felicity of the fathers — in which God showed that even such gifts of his were to be granted them — they did not see that now was the time in which it should be revealed in Christ that God properly bestows eternal goods upon the just, though he bestows temporal goods even upon the wicked. And so, when he had said: 'Our fathers hoped in thee; they hoped, and thou didst deliver them; they cried unto thee and were saved; they hoped in thee and were not confounded,' see what he added: 'But I am a worm and no man.' This indeed seems to be said simply to commend humility, that he might show himself in the eyes of his persecutors as something most abject and most despised;
5:2169
sed non est contemnenda altitudo secreti profunditasque mysterii praesertim in eis uerbis. quae tanto saluatori in prophetiae praedicatione coaptantur. dictus est hinc sensus elegantissimus a prioribus, ideo se hoc nomine Christum praenuntiari uoluisse, quia uermis de carne sine concubitu nascitur, sicut natus est ille de uirgine. sed in libro suo Iob cum de creaturis caelestibus loqueretur, quod in dei conspectu etiam ipsa uix munda sint: Quanto magis, inquit, homo putredo et filius hominis uermis.
然而這奧祕的崇高與深邃卻不可輕忽,尤其在這些配得如此偉大之救主、在預言宣告中所用的話語裡。前人由此提出一個極為精妙的解釋:祂之所以願意被以這名預言,乃因蟲是無交合而從肉中所生,正如祂是從童貞女所生。但在《約伯記》中,當論到天上的受造物、說連牠們在神眼中也難算潔淨時,經上說:『何況那如腐爛的人,和如蟲的世人。』
but the loftiness of the secret and the depth of the mystery is not to be despised, especially in those words which are fitted to so great a Saviour in the proclamation of prophecy. Hence a most elegant sense has been given by earlier writers: that he willed himself to be foretold under this name for this reason, because a worm is born of flesh without intercourse, even as he was born of the Virgin. But in his book Job, when he was speaking of the heavenly creatures, that even they are scarcely clean in the sight of God, says: 'How much more man, who is rottenness, and the son of man, who is a worm.'
5:2170
putredinem pro mortalitate posuit, quae iam uelut conceptam gerit moriendi necessitatem, in quam peccando contrusus est homo, et filium hominis uermem natum de putredine quasi putrem, hoc est de mortalitate mortalem. ac per hoc in his uerbis psalmi alium sensum nos quaerere admonuit illo quidem saluo neque reprobato, ut non solum scrutemur, quod ait: Ego autem sum uermis, sed etiam illud, quod addidit: et non homo, secundum illud, quod de libro Iob commemoraui, tamquam diceret: Ego autem sum filius hominis et non homo, non quod homo non sit Christus, de quo apostolus dicit:
祂以『腐爛』指必死性,就是那如今彷彿已懷有死亡之必然的必死性,人因犯罪被推入其中;祂又稱『世人』為蟲,是從腐爛所生、彷彿是腐爛的——就是由必死而必死的。祂藉此提醒我們在詩篇這些話中尋求另一層意思——前一層意思固然保存、並不廢棄——好叫我們不但察考祂所說的『但我是蟲』,也察考祂所加的『不是人』,正如我從《約伯記》所引述的,彷彿祂說:『但我是世人(人子),不是人』——並非說基督不是人,論到祂,使徒說:
He put 'rottenness' for mortality, which now bears as it were a conceived necessity of dying, into which man was thrust down by sinning; and 'the son of man' he called a worm, born of rottenness as it were rotten — that is, mortal from mortality. And by this he has admonished us to seek another sense in these words of the psalm — the former sense being indeed preserved and not rejected — so that we may examine not only what he says, 'But I am a worm,' but also what he added, 'and no man,' according to that which I have recalled from the book of Job, as though he said: 'But I am the son of man and no man' — not that Christ is not man, of whom the Apostle says:
5:2171
Unus et mediator dei et hominum homo Christus Iesusomnis enim filius hominis homo est —, sed ad quendam respicit sensus iste, qui homo sic fuerit, ut non esset filius hominis, id est Adam. forte ergo sic dictum est: Ego autem sum uermis et non homo, id est ego autem sum filius hominis et non homo, tamquam diceretur: Ego autem sum Christus, in quo omnes uiuificantur, non Adam, in quo omnes moriuntur. Ac per hoc discite, homines, per gratiam testamenti noui iam uitam concupiscere sempiternam. quid pro magno ita uos uultis a domino de morte liberari, sicut liberati sunt patres nostri, quando commendabat deus etiam terrenae felicitatis praeter se non esse alium largitorem?
『只有一位神,在神和人中間只有一位中保,乃是降世為人的基督耶穌』——因為凡人子都是人——但這層意思乃是指某一位,他雖是人卻不是人子,就是亞當。或許因此這樣說:『但我是蟲,不是人』,就是『但我是人子,不是人』,彷彿說:『但我是基督,眾人在祂裡面得生,不是亞當,眾人在他裡面死亡。』世人哪,你們就當藉新約的恩典,如今渴慕永生。你們為何把這事當作大事,如此盼望蒙主搭救脫離死亡,如同我們列祖蒙搭救那樣——那時神正吩咐說,除祂以外並無別的施予地上福分者?
'There is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus' — for every son of man is a man — but this sense looks to a certain one who was so a man that he was not a son of man, that is, Adam. Perhaps then it is thus said: 'But I am a worm and no man,' that is, 'But I am the son of man and no man,' as though it were said: 'But I am Christ, in whom all are made alive, not Adam, in whom all die.' And by this, learn, O men, through the grace of the new testament now to crave everlasting life. Why do you as some great thing so wish to be delivered by the Lord from death, as our fathers were delivered, when God was commending that there was no other bestower even of earthly felicity besides himself?
5:2172
illa felicitas ad ueterem hominem pertinet, quae uetustas ab Adam coepit. ego autem sum uermis et non homo; Christus, non Adam. a ueteri ueteres fuistis, a nouo noui estote; ab Adam homines, a Christo filii hominum. non enim sine causa familiarissime dominus in euangelio se filium hominis dicit magis quam hominem nec sine causa in alio psalmo: Homines, inquit, et iumenta saluos facies, domine, sicut multiplicata est misericordia tua, deus. abs te quippe etiam ista salus hominibus iumentisque communis. sed habent aliam homines noui propriam quandam et a iumentorum consortio separatam, quae ad nouum pertinet testamentum, habent omnino; nam de illa ibidem sequitur et dicit:
那福分屬於舊人,其舊乃是從亞當開始。『但我是蟲,不是人』——是基督,不是亞當。你們曾按舊人而為舊,如今當按新人而為新;按亞當你們是人,按基督你們是人子。因為主在福音書中極親切地稱自己為人子過於稱為人,並非無故;在另一篇詩篇中也非無故:『主啊,你救護人、也救護牲畜,正如你的慈愛何等豐盛,神啊。』因為連那人與牲畜共有的救護也是出於你。然而新人卻另有一種救護,是他們自己所獨有、與牲畜之交無涉的,屬於新約——他們確是有的;因為關於這救護,經上緊接著說:
That felicity pertains to the old man, whose oldness began from Adam. 'But I am a worm and no man' — Christ, not Adam. From the old you were old; from the new be new; from Adam men, from Christ sons of men. For not without cause does the Lord most familiarly in the Gospel call himself the Son of man rather than man, nor without cause in another psalm: 'Men,' it says, 'and beasts thou wilt save, O Lord, according as thy mercy is multiplied, O God.' For from thee comes even that salvation common to men and beasts. But new men have another salvation, proper to themselves and separated from the fellowship of beasts, which pertains to the new testament — they have it indeed; for concerning it there in the same place it follows and says:
5:2173
Filii autem hominum sub tegmine alarum tuarum sperabunt; inebriabuntur ab ubertate domus tuae et torrente uoluptatis tuae potabis eos, quoniam apud te fons uitae, in lumine tuo uidebimus lumen. certe et hic, cum superius dixisset \'homines\', posterius dixit <filii autem hominum\' tamquam distinguens ab hominibus filios hominum. in illa quippe felicitate eius salutis, quae communis est hominibus et iumentis, eo nomine illos appellare uoluit, quo demonstrarentur ad illum primum hominem pertinere, quo , uetustas coepit et mors, qui sic fuit homo, ut non esset filius hominis;
『惟有世人(人子)要投靠在你翅膀的蔭下;他們必因你殿裡的肥甘得以飽足,你也必叫他們喝你樂河的水;因為在你那裡有生命的源頭,在你的光中我們必得見光。』顯然這裡也是如此:上文既說了『人』,下文便說『惟有世人(人子)』,彷彿把人子與人區分開來。因為在那人與牲畜共有之救護的福分中,祂選用那名稱呼他們,好顯明他們是屬於那首先之人的——舊與死從那人開始,他雖是人卻不是人子;
'But the sons of men shall hope under the covering of thy wings; they shall be inebriated with the abundance of thy house, and thou shalt make them drink of the torrent of thy pleasure; for with thee is the fountain of life, and in thy light we shall see light.' Surely here too, when above he had said 'men,' afterwards he said 'but the sons of men,' as it were distinguishing the sons of men from men. For in that felicity of the salvation which is common to men and beasts, he chose to call them by that name whereby they might be shown to pertain to that first man, in whom oldness began, and death — who was so a man that he was not a son of man;
5:2174
istis autem posterioribus, qui sperant aliam felicitatem et fontis uitae ineffabilem uoluptatem et sempiterni luminis lumen, hoc nomen inposuit, quo se familiarius appellari uoluit dominus eorum, in quo talis gratia reuelata est, eosque filios hominum potius quam homines appellauit. Non autem existimes quasi locutionis regulam figi perpetua lege seruandam, ut, ubicumque legeris (homines) aut \'filios hominum\', secundum hanc distinctionem semper intellegas, sed ut se habuerit circumstantia lectionis, unde sensus, si patet, hauritur, si latet, eruitur; sicut in hoc loco psalmi huius quem non moueat distinctionis intentio, cum ille, qui dixerat: In te sperauerunt patres nostri et eruisti eos;
但對這後來的一群人,就是盼望另一種福分、盼望生命源頭那難以言喻之樂、並永恆之光的人,祂加上這名——即他們的主所願被更親切稱呼的名,因在祂裡面顯明了這樣的恩典——祂稱他們為人子過於稱為人。然而你不可以為這定下了一條言語的規則,必須永遠遵守,以致凡讀到『人』或『人子』之處,都當照這分別去理解;乃要按經文上下文的情形,若意思顯明便從中汲取,若意思隱藏便從中挖掘;正如在本詩篇這一處,那說『我們的列祖倚靠你,你便解救他們;
but on these latter ones, who hope for another felicity, and the ineffable pleasure of the fountain of life, and the light of everlasting light, he imposed this name by which their Lord willed to be more familiarly called — in whom such grace was revealed — and he called them sons of men rather than men. Yet do not suppose that a rule of speech is fixed, to be observed by a perpetual law, so that wherever you read 'men' or 'sons of men' you should always understand it according to this distinction; but as the context of the passage may hold, from which the sense, if it lies open, is drawn, and if it lies hidden, is dug out; as in this place of this psalm, whom might the strain of the distinction not disturb, when he who had said, 'Our fathers hoped in thee and thou didst deliver them;
5:2175
ad te clamauerunt et salui facti sunt; in te sperauerunt et non sunt confusi, subiungit: Ego autem? non enim ait sic: Et ego, sed: Ego autem. quid ergo iste, qui se ita distinguit? ego autem, inquit, sum uermis et non homo, tamquam illis, quos exaudisti et eruisti, eam commendares felicitatem, quae ad uetus pertinens testamentum homini ueteri tribuenda esset, qui coepit ab Adam, ego autem sum uermis, hoc est filius hominis, non homo sicut ille homo, qui non fuit filius hominis. Ac per hoc \'ego\' et quod sequitur: Opprobrium hominum et abiectio plebis; omnes, qui conspiciebant me, subsannabant me et locuti sunt labiis, mouerunt caput:
他們哀求你,便蒙拯救;他們倚靠你,就不至羞愧』的那位,接著說:『但我?』因為他不是這樣說『我也』,乃說『但我』。那麼這位如此把自己分別出來的是誰呢?他說:『但我是蟲,不是人』——彷彿對你所垂聽並解救的那些人,你正推崇那福分,就是屬舊約、當賜給從亞當開始之舊人的福分;但我是蟲,就是人子,不是像那不是人子之人的人。由此,這『我』和隨後的:『我是人所羞辱的,是百姓所藐視的;凡看見我的都嗤笑我,撇嘴搖頭,說:'
they cried unto thee and were saved; they hoped in thee and were not confounded,' subjoins: 'But I?' For he does not say thus: 'And I,' but 'But I.' What then is this one who thus distinguishes himself? 'But I,' he says, 'am a worm and no man' — as though, to those whom thou didst hear and deliver, thou wert commending that felicity which, pertaining to the old testament, was to be granted to the old man who began from Adam; but I am a worm, that is, the son of man, not a man like that man who was not a son of man. And by this the 'I' and what follows: 'The reproach of men and the outcast of the people; all who beheld me mocked me and spoke with their lips, they wagged the head:
5:2176
Sperauit in deum, eruat eum, saluum faciat eum, quoniam uult eum. hoc in labiis, non in corde dixerunt insultando, quod non fieret. non credendo, quod futurum esset. factum est autem et hoc, sed sicut fieri oportebat in filio hominis, in quo spes aeternae uitae fuerat reuelanda ad nouum pertinens testamentum, non sicut illi expectabant. et quia fieri non uidebant, tamquam superato insultabant pertinentes ad testamentum uetus et hominem. in quo omnes moriuntur, non ad filium hominis, in quo omnes uiuificabuntur. mortem quippe intulit homo sibi filioque hominis; uitam uero adtulit homini moriens et resurgens filius hominis, opprobrium hominum et abiectio plebis usque ad mortem.
『他倚靠神,神若喜悅他,就讓神救他,搭救他吧。』這是他們用嘴唇說的,不是從心裡說的,是譏誚地說,以為這事不會成就,不信這事將要成就。然而這事卻成就了,只是照著在人子身上當有的方式成就——永生的盼望要在祂裡面顯明,屬於新約——並非照他們所指望的那樣。因他們沒有看見這事成就,便譏誚祂如同被打敗的,這些屬舊約、屬那眾人在其中死亡之人的人,並不屬那眾人在其中要得生之人子。因為人給自己並給人子帶來了死亡;但人子藉著死而復活,給人帶來了生命——祂『是人所羞辱的,是百姓所藐視的』,直到於死。
He hoped in God, let him deliver him, let him save him, since he desireth him.' This they said with their lips, not in their heart, insulting because it would not come to pass, not believing that it was to be. Yet it did come to pass, but as it behoved to be done in the Son of man, in whom the hope of eternal life was to be revealed, pertaining to the new testament — not as they expected. And because they did not see it come to pass, they insulted him as though vanquished, they who pertained to the old testament and to the man in whom all die, not to the Son of man in whom all shall be made alive. For man brought death upon himself and upon the son of man; but the Son of man, dying and rising again, brought life to man — 'the reproach of men and the outcast of the people' even unto death.
5:2177
hoc enim uoluit in conspectu inimicorum pati. quo eum tamquam derelictum putarent, ut gratia commendaretur testamenti noui, qua disceremus aliam quaerere felicitatem, quae nunc est in fide, postea uero erit in specie. quam diu enim sumus in corpore. ait apostolus, peregrinamur a domino; per fidem enim ambulamus, non per speciem et ideo nunc in spe, tunc in re. Denique resurrectionem suam, quam non sicut nostram in longum differri oportebat, ut in exemplo carnis eius disceremus, quid in nostra sperare deberemus, noluit alienis demonstrare sed suis; alienis dico non natura sed uitio, quod semper contra naturam est.
祂之所以願在仇敵眼前受苦,好叫他們以為祂彷彿被離棄,乃為使新約的恩典得以推崇,藉此我們可以學會尋求另一種福分,就是如今在乎信、將來卻要在乎眼見的福分。使徒說:我們在身內的時候,便與主相離;因我們行事為人是憑著信心,不是憑著眼見,所以如今在乎盼望,將來在乎實現。總之,祂的復活——與我們的不同,不當延至久遠,好叫我們在祂肉身的榜樣中,學習當在自己身上盼望甚麼——祂願顯給的不是外人,乃是祂自己的人;我所謂外人,不是按本性,乃是按那總與本性相悖的敗壞。
For this he willed to suffer in the sight of his enemies, that they might think him as it were forsaken, so that the grace of the new testament might be commended, whereby we should learn to seek another felicity, which is now in faith but afterwards shall be in sight. For as long as we are in the body, says the Apostle, we are absent from the Lord; for we walk by faith, not by sight, and therefore now in hope, then in reality. In fine, his resurrection, which — unlike ours — ought not to be deferred to a long term, that in the example of his flesh we might learn what we ought to hope for in our own, he willed to show not to strangers but to his own; strangers I say not by nature but by vice, which is always against nature.
5:2178
mortuus est ergo in conspectu hominum, resurrexit autem in conspectu filiorum hominum, quia mors ad hominem pertinebat, resurrectio ad filium hominis; sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes uiuificabuntur. ut igitur exemplo suae carnis exhortaretur fideles suos temporalem pro aeterna felicitate contemnere, usque ad mortem pertulit persequentes atque saeuientes et quasi uicto et oppresso superbe inludentes. quod autem carnem suam resuscitauit et discipulorum aspectibus atque contactibus reddidit eisque uidentibus ascendit in caelum, ipsos aedificauit et, quid expectare, quid praedicare deberent, euidentissima ueritate monstrauit.
因此祂在人眼前死了,卻在人子眼前復活,因為死屬於人,復活屬於人子;因為在亞當裡眾人都死了,照樣在基督裡眾人也都要復活。所以,為要藉祂肉身的榜樣勸勉祂忠心的人,為永恆的福分而輕看短暫的福分,祂忍受了逼迫者與暴虐者直到於死,並忍受那些驕傲地譏誚祂如同被打敗、被壓制之人的嘲弄。但祂使自己的肉身復活,將它交還門徒得以看見、摸著,又在他們眼前升天,如此便建立了他們,並以極其顯明的真理指示他們當期望甚麼、當傳講甚麼。
He died therefore in the sight of men, but rose again in the sight of the sons of men, because death pertained to man, resurrection to the Son of man; for as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive. Therefore, that by the example of his flesh he might exhort his faithful ones to despise temporal felicity for the sake of eternal, he bore even unto death his persecutors and rageers, and those who proudly mocked him as if vanquished and crushed. But in that he raised up his own flesh and restored it to the sight and touch of his disciples, and ascended into heaven before their eyes, he built them up and showed with most evident truth what they ought to expect and to preach.
5:2179
illos autem, a quibus tanta mala usque ad mortem pertulerat, quasi de illo superato et extincto gloriantes in ea opinione dereliquit, ut, quisquis eorum salute aeterna saluus fieri uellet, hoc de illius mortui resurrectione crederet, quod hi, qui uiderunt, signis contestantibus praedicauerunt et pro ea praedicatione similia pet-peti non dubitauerunt. Quapropter etiam Iacobus, unus ex apostolis eius, in epistula 1 sua, cum exhortaretur fideles, qui post passionem et resurrectionem Christi adhuc in ista uita tenebantur, dispensationem testamenti ueteris nouique distinguens:
但那些使祂受盡如此大苦直到於死的人,祂卻任憑他們——他們正誇耀祂彷彿被打敗、被消滅——存於這種看法中:他們中間凡願得永恆之救的,必須信那已死者復活這事——就是那些親眼看見的人以隨著的神蹟作見證所傳講的,並且為這傳講不惜求受同樣的苦。因此雅各,就是祂使徒中的一位,在他的頭一封書信中,勸勉那些在基督受難復活之後仍在今生的信徒時,區分舊約與新約的安排,說:
But those from whom he had endured so great evils even unto death he left, as they gloried over him as it were vanquished and extinguished, in this opinion: that whosoever of them should wish to be saved with eternal salvation must believe this concerning the resurrection of him who had died — which those who saw it preached with signs bearing witness, and for that preaching did not hesitate to seek to suffer the like. Wherefore James also, one of his apostles, in his first epistle, when he was exhorting the faithful who after the passion and resurrection of Christ were still held in this life, distinguishing the dispensation of the old testament and the new:
5:2180
Sustinentiam, inquit, Iob audistis et finem domini uidistis, ne ideo patienter sustinerent temporalia mala, ut sibi hoc restitueretur, quod recepisse Iob legimus. nam et ab illo uulnere atque putredine saluus est factus et ei cuncta, quae amiserat, duplicata sunt restituta. ubi etiam commendata est resurrectionis fides. nam filii non in duplum sed totidem redditi etiam illos. quos amiserat, resurrecturos significarunt; sic ipsi quoque illis prioribus iuncti a restitutione dupli non inuenirentur alieni. ut ergo non talem remunerationem speraremus, quando mala temporalia pateremur, non ait: Sustinentiam et finem Iob audistis, sed ait:
他說:『你們聽見過約伯的忍耐,也看見了主的結局』,免得他們為此緣故忍耐現世的惡——盼望那復還給他們,就是我們所讀約伯所領受的。因為約伯也從那瘡與腐爛中得痊癒,凡他所失去的都加倍還給他;在其中也推崇了復活的信德。因為那些兒女不是加倍、乃是同數還給他,這表明連他所失去的也要復活;如此那些先前的兒女,與後來的相聯,也不至於在加倍的復還中被視為外人。所以,為叫我們在受現世之惡時不盼望這樣的報償,他不說『你們聽見過約伯的忍耐與結局』,乃說:
'Ye have heard,' he says, 'of the patience of Job, and have seen the end of the Lord,' lest they should for this reason patiently endure temporal evils — that this might be restored to them which we read Job received. For he too was made whole from that wound and putrefaction, and all that he had lost was restored to him doubled; wherein the faith of the resurrection was also commended. For the sons, restored not double but the same number, signified that even those whom he had lost would rise again; so those too, joined to those former ones, would not be found alien from the restoration of the double. Therefore, that we might not hope for such a recompense when we suffered temporal evils, he did not say: 'Ye have heard of the patience and the end of Job,' but he said:
5:2181
Sustinentiam Iob audistis et finem domini uidistis, tamquam diceret: Mala temporalia sicut Iob sustinete, sed pro hac sustinentia non temporalia bona sperate, quae illi aucta redierunt, sed aeterna potius, quae in domino praecesserunt. Iob ergo de illis patribus erat, qui exclamauerunt et salui facti sunt. cum enim dicit: Ego autem, satis insinuat, qua salute illos saluos esse factos uelit intellegi, in qua ipse utique derelictus est, non quo illi a salute aeterna fuerint alieni, sed in occulto tunc erat, quod in Christo fuerat reuelandum. in uetere quippe testamento uelamen est, quod tunc auferetur, cum ad Christum quisque inde transierit.
『你們聽見過約伯的忍耐,也看見了主的結局』,彷彿他說:你們要像約伯那樣忍耐現世的惡,但為這忍耐不要盼望那還給他且加增了的現世好處,倒要盼望那在主裡先行的永恆之善。所以約伯是那些哀求而蒙拯救之列祖中的一位。因為當他說『但我』時,便充分表明他要人明白他們是憑何種救護得救——就是他自己在其中確被離棄的那救護;並非說他們與永恆之救無分,乃是那要在基督裡顯明的當時仍在隱藏中。因為在舊約有一層帕子,及至有人從那裡歸向基督時,這帕子就必除去。
'Ye have heard of the patience of Job, and have seen the end of the Lord,' as though he said: Endure temporal evils as Job did, but for this endurance hope not for temporal goods, which returned to him increased, but rather for eternal goods, which in the Lord went before. Job therefore was of those fathers who cried out and were saved. For when he says, 'But I,' he sufficiently intimates by what salvation he would have it understood that they were saved — a salvation in which he himself indeed was forsaken; not that they were alien from eternal salvation, but that which was to be revealed in Christ was then in hiding. For in the old testament there is a veil, which shall then be taken away when anyone shall pass thence to Christ.
5:2182
quo crucifixo uelamen etiam templi scissum est, ut significaretur, quod apostolus de uelamine ueteris testamenti dixit: Quoniam in Christo euacuatur.
祂被釘十字架時,殿裡的幔子也裂開了,好表明使徒論到舊約帕子所說的:『因為這帕子在基督裡已經廢去了。』
When he was crucified, the veil of the temple also was rent, that it might be signified what the Apostle said concerning the veil of the old testament: 'Because in Christ it is done away.'
5:2183
Nam et in illis patribus quamuis rarissima tamen fuerunt et usque ad mortem exempla patientiae a sanguine Abel usque ad sanguinem Zachariae, quorum sanguinem dicit dominus Iesus et ab eis exigendum, qui in patrum suorum, a quibus illi occisi sunt, iniquitate persisterent, et in nouo testamento nec defuit nec deest bonorum fidelium multitudo, qui etiam ista temporali felicitate praepolleant et in ea largitoris dei bonitatem misericordiamque experiantur tenentes tamen, quod dispensator noui testamenti diuitibus huius saeculi apostolus praecipit, non superbe sapere neque sperare in incerto diuitiarum sed in deo uiuo, qui praestat nobis omnia abundanter ad fruendum; ut bene faciant.
因為連在那些列祖中,也有——雖然極其稀少——忍耐直到於死的榜樣,從亞伯的血直到撒迦利亞的血,主耶穌說這血要向那些持守其列祖之罪孽、以致那些人被殺害之人追討;在新約中,也不曾缺乏、如今也不缺乏眾多美好的忠信之人,他們甚至在這現世的福分上出眾,並在其中經歷賜予者神的良善與憐憫,卻仍持守那新約的分配者使徒對今世富足人所吩咐的:不要自高,也不要倚靠無定的錢財,只要倚靠那厚賜百物給我們享受的永生神;好叫他們行善,
For even in those fathers there were — though most rare — examples of patience even unto death, from the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, whose blood the Lord Jesus says shall be required even from those who should persist in the iniquity of their fathers, by whom those were slain; and in the new testament there has neither failed nor is failing a multitude of good faithful ones who even excel in this temporal felicity and in it experience the goodness and mercy of God the giver, yet holding what the Apostle, the dispenser of the new testament, enjoins upon the rich of this world: not to be highminded, nor to hope in the uncertainty of riches, but in the living God, who giveth us all things abundantly to enjoy; that they may do good,
5:2184
diuites sint in operibus bonis, facile tribuant, communicent, thesaurizent sibi fundamentum bonum in futurum, ut adprehendant ueram uitam, qualis in Christi non tantum spiritu uerum etiam carne manifestata est. cum resurrexit a mortuis, non qualem Iudaei in illo peremerunt. quando eum de manibus eorum deus non eruit eumque dereliquisse uisus est exclamantem: Deus, deus meus, ut quid me dereliquisti? ut eo modo in se transfiguraret martyres suos, qui, etsi mori nollent, quod etiam Petro dixit: \'Alter te cinget et feret, quo tu non uis\\ significans. qua morte glorificaturus erat deum, et ob hoc a deo suo derelicti uiderentur ad tempus, cum eis nollet praestare, quod uellent.
在善事上富足,甘心施捨,樂意供給,為自己積成美好的根基,預備將來,好叫他們持定那真正的生命——就是在基督裡不但按靈、也按肉身所顯明的生命,當祂從死裡復活時——並非猶太人在祂裡面所殺的那種生命,那時神沒有從他們手中搭救祂,祂彷彿被離棄,呼喊說:『我的神,我的神,為甚麼離棄我?』——好叫祂如此把祂的殉道者轉化入自己裡面,這些殉道者縱然不願死——祂對彼得也表明這事,說:『另有一人要束上你,帶你到你不願去的地方』,是指明他要以何等的死榮耀神——並因此彷彿被他們的神暫時離棄,那時神不肯把他們所願的賜給他們。
be rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate, laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on the true life — such as was manifested in Christ not only in spirit but even in flesh, when he rose from the dead — not such as the Jews slew in him, when God did not deliver him from their hands and he seemed to have forsaken him as he cried out: 'My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?' — so that in this manner he might transfigure into himself his martyrs, who, even though they would not die, — which he signified also to Peter when he said, 'Another shall gird thee and carry thee whither thou wouldest not,' foretelling by what death he should glorify God — and for this reason might seem to be forsaken by their God for a time, when he would not grant them what they wished.
5:2185
illam uocem cordis emitterent illumque adhiberent pietatis affectum, quem passione inpendente ore proprio dominus expressit eos in se identidem transfigurans: Verum non quod ego uolo, sed quod tu uis, pater. In quo enim primitus nisi in ipso capite nostro debuit apparere, propter quam uitam Christiani sumus? propterea non ait: Deus meus, dereliquisti me, sed causam commonuit requirendam, cum addidit: ut quid dereliquisti me? id est quare. propter quid, quam ob causam? profecto enim erat aliqua causa eaque non parua, ut Noe liberaret de diluuio. Loth de caelesti incendio.
他們當發出那心中的聲音,並流露那虔敬的情感,就是主在受難迫近時親口所表達、一再把他們轉化入自己裡面的:『然而不要照我的意思,只要照你的意思,父啊。』因為這事若不首先顯在我們的元首身上,還當顯在誰身上呢?我們作基督徒正是為那生命的緣故。所以祂不說『我的神,你離棄了我』,乃提醒我們當尋求緣由,因祂加上說:『為甚麼離棄我?』——就是為何、為甚麼、為著甚麼緣故?因為必定有一個緣故,且非小事:祂救挪亞脫離洪水,救羅得脫離天降的烈火,
They should send forth that voice of the heart and apply that affection of piety which, when his passion was imminent, the Lord expressed with his own mouth, again and again transfiguring them into himself: 'Yet not what I will, but what thou wilt, Father.' For in whom should it first appear, if not in our very Head, for the sake of which life we are Christians? Therefore he does not say: 'My God, thou hast forsaken me,' but he reminded us that a cause must be sought, when he added: 'why hast thou forsaken me?' — that is, wherefore, for what, for what cause? For assuredly there was some cause, and that not a small one, that he should free Noah from the flood, Lot from the heavenly conflagration,
5:2186
Isaac de imminenti gladio, Ioseph de calumnia mulieris et custodia carceris, Moysen ab Aegyptiis, Raab de excidio ciuitatis, Susannam a testibus falsis, Danihelem a leonibus. tres uiros ab ignibus aliosque patres, qui exclamauerunt et salui facti sunt, et Christum non liberaret de manibus Iudaeorum eumque in potestate saeuientium usque ad mortis exitum derelinqueret. ut quid hoc? propter quid hoc nisi propter illud, quod paulo post in eodem psalmo dicit: Non ad insipientiam mihi, hoc est corpori meo, ecclesiae meae, minimis meis? nam et in euangelio: Quando uni ex minimis meis fecistis, inquit, mihi fecistis.
救以撒脫離臨近的刀,救約瑟脫離婦人的誣告與牢獄的看守,救摩西脫離埃及人,救喇合脫離城的毀滅,救蘇撒拿脫離假見證人,救但以理脫離獅子,救那三人脫離火,並救其他哀求而蒙拯救的列祖——卻不肯救基督脫離猶太人的手,反把祂留在暴虐者的權下直到死亡的結局。這是為何?為甚麼緣故如此,若不是為著祂稍後在同一篇詩篇中所說的『不算為我的愚昧』——就是為我的身體、我的教會、我這些微小者的緣故?因為在福音書中也說:『你們既作在我這弟兄中一個最小的身上,就是作在我身上了。』
Isaac from the imminent sword, Joseph from the woman's slander and the custody of prison, Moses from the Egyptians, Rahab from the destruction of the city, Susanna from false witnesses, Daniel from the lions, the three men from the fires, and the other fathers who cried out and were saved — and yet would not free Christ from the hands of the Jews, but would leave him in the power of the raging ones even unto the issue of death. Why this? For what cause this, save for the sake of that which a little after in the same psalm he says: 'not unto folly for me' — that is, for my body, my Church, my little ones? For in the Gospel also: 'When ye did it unto one of the least of these mine,' he says, 'ye did it unto me.'
5:2187
sic itaque dictum est \'et non ad insipientiam mihi\', quo modo dictum est <mihi fecistis\', et sic dictum est \'quare dereliquisti me\\ quo modo dictum est: Qui uos recipit. me recipit, et, qui nos spernit, me spernit. non ergo ad insipientiam nobis, sed ut sapiamus non propter istam uitam, in qua nos deus aliquando usque ad mortem persequentium manibus derelinquit, sed propter illam sempiternam nos debere esse Christianos, quia hoc in illo praecessisse intuemur, ex cuius nomine sic uocamur. Ecce ita factum est. tamen tam multi non ob aliud uolunt esse Christiani, nisi ut huius uitae felicitate perfruantur, ideoque illa deficiente deficiunt.
所以『不算為我的愚昧』的說法,正如『你們作在我身上了』的說法一樣;『為甚麼離棄我?』的說法,也正如『接待你們的就是接待我』和『輕棄你們的就是輕棄我』的說法一樣。因此這不是我們的愚昧,乃是要叫我們得智慧:我們作基督徒不當為著今生——在今生中神有時任憑我們落在逼迫者手中直到於死——乃當為著那永生,因為我們看見這事已在祂身上先行,我們正是照祂的名而如此得稱。看哪,這事已然成就;然而何等多的人願作基督徒,無非為要享受今生的福樂,因此那福樂一衰退,他們也就衰退了。
So then 'and not unto folly for me' is said in the same way as 'ye did it unto me' is said, and so 'why hast thou forsaken me?' is said in the same way as it is said: 'He that receiveth you receiveth me,' and, 'he that despiseth us despiseth me.' Therefore it is not unto folly for us, but that we may be wise: that we ought to be Christians not for the sake of this life, in which God sometimes leaves us even unto death in the hands of persecutors, but for the sake of that everlasting life, because we behold this to have gone before in him from whose name we are so called. Behold, so it has come to pass; yet so many wish to be Christians for no other reason than to enjoy the felicity of this life, and therefore when it fails they fail.
5:2188
quid, si non in ipso nostro capite tam insigne constitueretur exemplum, quo disceremus pro caelestibus terrena contemnere non respicientes, quae uidentur, sed quae non uidentur? quae enim uidentur, temporalia sunt, quae autem non uidentur, aeterna. quos in se illis uocibus transfigurare dignatus est? nam quan- tum ad ipsum adtinet, quo modo uellet liberari ab illa hora, qui propterea uenerat in illam horam? aut quo modo sic loquebatur, quasi ei, quod nollet, accideret, cum potestatem habuerit ponendi animam suam et iterum sumendi eam nec eam quisquam tolleret ab illo, sed eam ipse poneret et resumeret, sicut in euangelio dicit?
倘若在我們的元首身上未曾立下如此顯著的榜樣,好叫我們為天上之事學習輕看地上之事,不顧念所見的、只顧念所不見的,又當如何呢?因為所見的是暫時的,所不見的是永遠的。祂藉那些聲音屈尊將誰轉化入自己裡面呢?因為就祂自己而論,那為此才進入那時刻的,怎會願意脫離那時刻呢?或者祂怎會如此說話,彷彿有祂所不願的事臨到祂,其實祂有權柄捨去性命,也有權柄取回,並且無人能奪去,乃是祂自己捨去,也自己取回,正如祂在福音書中所說?
What if in our very Head so signal an example had not been set up, whereby we might learn for the sake of heavenly things to despise earthly things, not regarding the things that are seen, but the things that are not seen? For the things that are seen are temporal, but the things that are not seen are eternal. Whom did he deign to transfigure into himself by those voices? For as far as pertains to himself, in what manner would he wish to be freed from that hour, who for that very purpose had come unto that hour? Or in what manner did he so speak, as though something befell him which he did not will, when he had power to lay down his soul and to take it again, nor could anyone take it from him, but he himself would lay it down and take it up again, as he says in the Gospel?
5:2189
sed procul dubio nos in illis uocibus nostris eramus et caput pro suo corpore loquebatur non disiuncta significatione uocis, ubi conexio non disiungitur unitatis. Denique in psalmo sequitur et orans aduerte quid dicat: Quoniam tu, inquit, extraxisti me de uentre, spes mea ab uberibus matris meae. in te iactatus sum ex utero; de uentre matris meae deus meus es tu, tamquam diceret: De alia re et ab alia re in aliam rem me traiecisti, ut tu sis mihi bonum pro terrenis bonis mortalitatis huius, quam in matris uentre sortitus sum, quia ubera suxi. haec enim uetustas est, de qua tu me extraxisti, et illa carnalis natiuitatis bona sunt, a quibus tu spes mea es; inde enim ad te conuersus sum.
但毫無疑問,我們正在我們自己的那些聲音裡,元首乃是為祂的身體說話,聲音的含義並未分開,因為合一的聯繫並未分開。最後,詩篇接著說,祂禱告時,且看祂所說的:『因為你』,祂說,『使我出母腹,我在母懷裡就把你當作我的盼望。我自出母胎便被交託給你;自我母腹你就是我的神』——彷彿祂說:你把我從一種境況、脫離一種境況,遷入另一種境況,好叫你作我的美善,代替這必死性中地上的好處,就是我在母腹中所得的,因我吃過奶。因為這就是那舊,是你把我從其中拉出來的;那些乃是肉身出生的好處,你卻是我脫離那些好處的盼望;因我從那裡轉向了你。
But without doubt we were in those voices of ours, and the Head was speaking for his body, with no disjoined signification of the voice, where the connection of unity is not disjoined. Finally, in the psalm it follows, and, as he prays, mark what he says: 'For thou,' he says, 'didst draw me out of the womb, my hope from the breasts of my mother. Upon thee was I cast from the womb; from my mother's womb thou art my God' — as though he said: From one thing and away from one thing thou hast transferred me unto another thing, that thou mightest be to me a good in place of the earthly goods of this mortality, which I obtained in my mother's womb, because I sucked the breasts. For this is the oldness out of which thou didst draw me, and those are the goods of carnal nativity from which thou art my hope; for thence was I turned unto thee.
5:2190
et ex utero, id est ex his, quae in utero inchoaui, in te iactatus sum ad te scilicet transiens, totum me tibi committens. ideoque de uentre matris meae, id est de bonis carnis, quam sumpsi in uentre matris meae, deus meus es tu, ut de his tu sis bonum meum, ea locutione dictum est, ac si diceretur uerbi gratia: De terra caelum habito, hoc est hinc illo emigraui; et ista nostra in illum transfiguratio est, qui per gratiam testamenti noui mutamus uitam transeuntes de uetere ad nouam.
『並且從母腹』,就是從我在母腹中所開始的那些事,『我被交託給你』,是過渡到你,把我自己完全交託給你。因此『自我母腹』,就是從我在母腹中所取的肉身之好處,『你是我的神』,好叫你從這些事中作我的美善;這是用那種說法所說的,彷彿有人舉例說:我從地上而居於天上,就是說我從此遷往那裡。這正是我們轉化入祂裡面之事,我們這些藉新約恩典改變生命、從舊過渡到新的人。
'And from the womb,' that is, from those things which I began in the womb, 'upon thee was I cast,' passing over to thee, committing myself wholly to thee. And therefore 'from my mother's womb,' that is, from the goods of the flesh which I took in my mother's womb, 'thou art my God,' that out of these things thou mightest be my good; which is spoken in that manner of speaking, as if one were to say, for example's sake: From earth I inhabit heaven, that is, hence I have migrated thither. And this transfiguration of ours into him it is, we who through the grace of the new testament change our life, passing over from the old to the new.
5:2191
nam ille hanc rem sacramento suae passionis resurrectionisque significans carnem mutauit de mortalitate ad inmortalitatem, uitam uero non mutauit de uetustate in nouitatem, qui numquam fuit in impietate, unde transiret ad pietatem. Quamquam non defuerunt, qui hoc, quod dictum est: De uentre matris meae deus meus es tu, ideo ad ipsum caput nostrum pertinere sentirent, quoniam pater in tantum est deus eius, in quantum homo est in forma serui, non in quantum illi aequalis est in forma dei, ideo: De uentre matris meae deus meus es tu, ac si diceret: Ex eo, quod homo factus sum. deus meus es tu. sed quid est: Tu extraxisti me de uentre, si ad ipsum legum de uirgine procreatum refertur?
因為祂藉受難與復活的聖禮表明這事,把祂的肉身從必死改為不朽,卻沒有把祂的生命從舊改為新,因祂從未在不虔中,無從由此過渡到虔敬。然而也不乏有人認為,這所說的『自我母腹你就是我的神』之所以關乎我們的元首本身,乃因父之為祂的神,是就祂在僕人形像中為人而言,不是就祂在神的形像中與父同等而言;因此『自我母腹你就是我的神』,彷彿祂說:從我成為人這一點上,你是我的神。但『你使我出母腹』這話,若指祂自己從童貞女而生,又當如何解呢?
For he, signifying this matter by the sacrament of his passion and resurrection, changed his flesh from mortality to immortality, but did not change his life from oldness to newness, who was never in impiety, whence he might pass over to piety. And yet there have not been lacking those who felt that this which is said, 'From my mother's womb thou art my God,' pertains for this reason to our very Head, because the Father is his God in so far as he is man in the form of a servant, not in so far as he is equal to him in the form of God; therefore, 'From my mother's womb thou art my God,' as if he said: From that whereby I was made man, thou art my God. But what is 'Thou didst draw me out of the womb,' if it be referred to himself, begotten of the Virgin?
5:2192
quasi alios non deus extrahat, in cuius prouidentia est omnis ordo nascendi; an inde significare uoluit uirginis partum seruata uirginitatis integritate mirabili, cum ait: Tu extraxisti me de uentre, ut quod illic mirabiliter factum est, cum deus fecisse dicitur, nemini incredibile uideatur? quid ergo est et illud: Spes mea ab uberibus matris meae? quo modo et hoc ad ipsum caput ecclesiae referri potest, quasi spes eius, quae in deo est, a matris uberibus ei coeperit, non et ante in ipso utero? neque enim spes alia intellegenda est, nisi qua futurum erat, ut deus eum exaltaret a mortuis; totum quippe hoc secundum id, quod homo factus est, dicitur.
彷彿神不也把別人拉出母腹麼?萬物出生的整個次序豈不都在祂的護理之中?或者祂藉此願表明童貞女的生產——貞潔的完整以奇蹟得以保全——當祂說『你使我出母腹』,好叫那在那裡奇妙成就之事——既說是神所作的——在人看來無可置疑?那麼『我在母懷裡就把你當作我的盼望』這話又當如何解?這話又怎能指教會的元首本身,彷彿祂在神裡面的盼望是從母懷開始,而非早在母腹之中就已有了?因為除了那要成就之事——就是神要叫祂從死裡升高——之外,別無可解的盼望;因為這一切都是按祂成為人這一點而說的。
as though God does not draw out others also, in whose providence is the whole order of being born; or did he by this wish to signify the Virgin's childbearing, the integrity of virginity being preserved by a marvel, when he says: 'Thou didst draw me out of the womb,' so that what was there wondrously done — since God is said to have done it — might seem incredible to no one? What then is that also: 'My hope from the breasts of my mother'? In what manner can this too be referred to the very Head of the Church, as though his hope, which is in God, began for him from his mother's breasts, and not already before in the womb itself? For no other hope is to be understood save that whereby it was to come to pass that God should exalt him from the dead; for the whole of this is said according to that which he was made man.
← 上一段下一段 →
← 第 4 章第 6 章 →
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364