📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 書信與論戰集(CSEL)

書信與論戰集(CSEL) 第 8 章 第 3/7 段

拉丁文原文.37 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 8:79–8:115(全章共 242 節)

← 第 7 章第 9 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
8:79
nam mihi uel potius illi credite, qui ait: quaerite et inuenietis, nec cognitionem desperandam esse et manifestiorem futuram, quam sunt illi numeri. nunc ad propositum ueniamus. iam enim sero coepi metuere, ne hoc principium modum excederet. et non est leue. nam modus procul dubio diuinus est, sed fefellerit, cum dulciter ducit. ero cautior. cum sapiens fuero. Post pristinum sermonem, quem in primum librum contulimus, septem fere diebus a disputando fuimus otiosi, cum tres tamen Uergilii libros post primum recenseremus atque, ut in tempore congruere uidebatur. tractaremus. quo tamen opere Licentius in poeticae studium sic inflammatus est, ut aliquantum mihi etiam reprimendus uideretur.
因為請信我,或不如說信那位說「你們尋找,就尋見」的主:認識不當被絕望,並且它將要變得比那些數字更為顯明。如今讓我們回到所提的正題。因為此刻雖已遲,我已開始擔憂,唯恐這篇序言超出適當的分寸。而這絕非小事——因為分寸無疑是神聖的,但當它甘美地引領我們時,也可能欺哄我們。我會更加謹慎——等我有智慧的時候。在我們收入第一卷的先前那番談話之後,我們停止論辯約有七日,其間我們卻在第一卷之後研讀了維吉爾的三卷書,並照當時所宜的加以討論。然而利肯提烏斯竟因這番功夫,對詩歌之熱忱燃燒到如此地步,以致我覺得甚至需要略加約束他。
For believe me, or rather believe Him who said, 'Seek and you shall find,' that knowledge is not to be despaired of, and that it will become more manifest than those numbers are. Now let us come to the matter proposed. For already, late as it is, I have begun to fear lest this preface exceed due measure. And it is no light thing — for measure is beyond doubt divine, but it can deceive when it leads us sweetly along. I shall be more cautious — when I am wise. After the earlier discourse, which we gathered into the first book, we rested from disputing for about seven days, during which, however, we went over three books of Virgil after the first, and discussed them as seemed to suit the occasion. Yet by that work Licentius was so inflamed with zeal for poetry that I thought he even needed somewhat to be restrained by me.
8:80
iam enim ab hac intentione ad nullam se rem deuocari libenter ferebat. tandem tamen ad retractandam quam distuleramus de Academicis quaestionem cum a me, quantum potui. lumen philosophiae laudaretur, non inuitus accessit. et forte dies ita serenus effulserat, ut nulli prorsus rei magis quam serenandis animis nostris congruere uideretur. maturius itaque solito lectos reliquimus paulumque cum rusticis egimus quod tempus urgebat. - Tum Alypius: Antequam uos. inquit, audiam de Academicis disputantes. uolo mihi legatur sermo ille uester, quem dicitis me absente perfectum;
因為如今他已不能欣然忍受從這一追求被喚回到任何別的事上。然而末了,為重新拾起我們曾擱置的關於學園派的問題,在我盡我所能地讚美了哲學之光後,他也並非不情願地前來。而恰巧那日破曉是如此明朗,以致似乎再沒有比澄清我們的心靈更相宜的事了。於是我們比平常更早離開床鋪,並照時令所催促的,與鄉間的農人略作打理。隨後阿呂皮烏斯說:「在我聽你們論辯學園派之前,我要人把你們那番談話讀給我聽,就是你們說在我不在時完成的那番;」
For now he could not gladly bear to be recalled from this pursuit to any other matter. Yet at last, to take up again the question about the Academics which we had postponed, he came not unwillingly, once the light of philosophy had been praised by me as far as I could. And by chance the day had dawned so bright that it seemed to suit nothing more than the clearing of our minds. And so, rising earlier than usual, we left our beds and dealt a little with the country folk, as the season pressed us to do. Then Alypius said: 'Before I hear you disputing about the Academics, I want that discourse of yours read to me, which you say was completed in my absence;'
8:81
non enim possum aliter, cum inde huius disceptationis occasio nata, sit in audiendis uobis bis non aut errare aut certe laborare. — Quod cum factum esset et in eo paene totum antemeridianum tempus consumtum uideremus, redire ab agro, qui deambulantes nos acceperat, domum instituimus. — Et Licentius: Quaeso, inquit. ante prandium mihi breuiter totam Academicorum sententiam exponendo repetere ne graueris, ne quid in ea me fugiat, quod pro partibus meis sit. — Faciam, inquam, et eo libentius, quo de hac re cogitans parum prandeas. — Ne, inquit ille, istinc securus sis; nam et multos et maxime patrem meum saepe animaduerti eo edaciorem, quo refertior curis esset.
「因為既然這場辯論的緣由是從那番談話生出來的,我若不聽它,聽你們時就不免或者出錯,或者至少要加倍費力。」這事辦妥後,我們見幾乎整個上午都耗在其中,便決意從那接待我們散步的田野返回家中。利肯提烏斯說:「求你在午餐前,不要不肯將學園派的整套主張為我簡要地講一遍、重述一遍,免得其中有任何或許有利於我這一方的東西從我這裡溜走。」我說:「我會照辦,並且格外樂意,因為你思想這件事,午餐就會吃得少了。」他說:「你在這點上大可不必放心;因為我常觀察到許多人,尤其是我父親,愈是被憂慮充滿,反倒愈是貪食。」
'for I cannot do otherwise, since from that place the occasion of this debate arose, than either err in listening to you, or at least labour twice over.' When this had been done, and we saw that almost the whole forenoon had been consumed in it, we resolved to return home from the field, which had received us as we walked about. And Licentius said: 'I beg you, before lunch, do not be reluctant to run through and repeat for me briefly the whole opinion of the Academics, lest anything in it escape me which might be on the side of my party.' 'I shall do so,' I said, 'and the more gladly, since by thinking about this matter you will eat but little lunch.' 'Do not,' said he, 'be secure on that score; for I have often observed many men, and especially my father, to be the more voracious the more they are stuffed with cares.'
8:82
deinde tu quoque de istis metris cogitantem non sic expertus es, ut cura mea mensa secura sit. quod quidem apud me ipsum mirari soleo; quid enim sibi uult. quod tunc primum pertinacius appetimus. cum in aliud intendimus animum? aut quis est, qui manibus et dentibus nostris occupatis nobis nimis imperiosus fit? — Audi potius, inquam. de Academicis quod rogaueras, ne te metra ista uoluentem non solum in l\'pulis sine metro sed etiam in quaestionibus patiar. si quid autem pro mea parte occultabo, prodet Alypius. — Bona fide tua opus est, inquit Alypius;
「再者,你自己也曾體驗過,一個思想著你那些格律的人,並不是那種令我的憂慮使他的餐桌無憂的人。我確實常在心裡驚訝這事;因為這是甚麼意思——我們正當把心思傾注於別事時,那時反倒最頑強地渴望食物?或者,當我們的手與牙已然忙碌時,是誰對我們成了過於專橫的主人?」我說:「你倒不如聽你先前所問關於學園派的事吧,免得你一面翻弄那些格律,我一面不只在無格律的食物上、甚至在我們的問題上都得忍受你。但倘若我在自己這一方隱瞞了甚麼,阿呂皮烏斯會揭發出來。」阿呂皮烏斯說:「所需要的正是你的信實;」
'Besides, you yourself have experienced that a man thinking about those metres of yours is not such that my care makes his table free of care. Indeed, I am often wont to marvel at this within myself; for what does it mean, that we then most stubbornly crave food precisely when we bend our mind to something else? Or who is he that, when our hands and teeth are already busy, becomes too imperious a master over us?' 'Rather listen,' I said, 'to what you had asked about the Academics, lest, while you turn over those metres, I should endure you not only in your food without metre but even in our questions. But if I conceal anything on my side, Alypius will betray it.' 'Your good faith is needed,' said Alypius;
8:83
nam si metuendum est, ne aliquid occultes, a me deprehendi posse difficile arbitror cum, a quo me ista didicisse nullus qui me nouit ignorat, praesertim cum in prodendo uero non magis uictoriae quam animo tuo consulturus sis. Agam, inquam. bona fide, quoniam de iure praescribis. nam et Academicis placuit nec homini scientiam posse contingere earum dumtaxat rerum, quae ad philosophiam pertinent — nam cetera curare se Carneades negabat — et tamen hominem posse esse sapientem sapientisque totum munus, ut abs te quoque, Licenti, illo sermone dissertum est, in conquisitione ueri explicari: ex quo confici, ut nulli etiam rei sapiens adsentiatur;
「因為倘若須要擔憂你隱瞞了甚麼,我認為那難以被我察覺——凡認識我的人,沒有不知道我這些東西正是從你這裡學來的——尤其因為你在揭示真理時,所顧念的並非勝利,更過於顧念你自己的良心。」我說:「我會憑信實而行,既然你以正道之規來規定。因為學園派主張:其一,人不能獲得知識——至少是那些與哲學有關之事的知識(因為卡爾涅阿德斯否認他關心其餘之事)——然而人卻能成為智者,而智者的全部職分,正如利肯提烏斯你在那番談話中也已闡述的,乃展現於對真理的探求中:由此推出,智者對任何事都不表示贊同;」
'for if it is to be feared that you conceal something, I judge it hard for it to be detected by me — from whom no one who knows me is ignorant that I learned these very things — especially since, in bringing forth the truth, you will be consulting no more for victory than for your own conscience.' 'I shall proceed,' I said, 'in good faith, since you prescribe by the rule of right. For the Academics held both that knowledge cannot fall to a man — of those matters at least which pertain to philosophy (for Carneades denied that he cared for the rest) — and yet that a man can be wise, and that the whole task of the wise man, as was set forth by you too, Licentius, in that discourse, is unfolded in the search for truth: from which it follows that the wise man assents to nothing at all;
8:84
erret enim necesse est, quod sapienti nefas est, si a adsentiatur rebus incertis. et omnia incerta » esse non dicebant solum uerum etiam copiosissimis rationibus adfirmabant. sed uerum non posse comprehendi ex illa Stoici Zenonis definitione arripuisse uidebantur, qui ait id uerum percipi posse, quod ita esset animo inpressum ex eo, unde esset, ut esse non posset ex eo, unde non esset. quod breuius pLaniusque sic dicitur. his signis uerum posse conprehendi, quae signa non potest habere quod falsum est. hoc prorsus non posse inueniri uehementissime ut conuincerent incubuerunt. inde dissensiones philosophorum.
「因為智者若對不確定之事表示贊同,便必然出錯——這對智者是罪。而他們不僅說萬事皆不確定,更以最豐富的論據加以確認。但他們似乎是從斯多亞派芝諾的那條定義中,抓住了『真理不能被把握』這一點:芝諾說,凡如此從其所出之處印在心中、以致不可能出於其所不出之處的,才可被知覺為真。這更簡明地說便是:真理能藉那些虛假之物所不能具有的記號被把握。而他們竭力至極地要證明:這樣的記號絕無法尋得。哲學家之間的分歧便由此而生。」
'for he must err — which is a sin in the wise man — if he assents to uncertain things. And they not only said that all things are uncertain, but affirmed it with the most abundant arguments. But that the truth cannot be comprehended they seemed to have seized upon from that definition of the Stoic Zeno, who says that this can be perceived as true which is so impressed upon the mind from that whence it is, that it could not be from that whence it is not. Which is said more briefly and plainly thus: the truth can be comprehended by these signs which those things cannot have that are false. That this can in no way be found, they laboured most vehemently to prove. Thence the disagreements of the philosophers.'
8:85
inde sensuum fallaciae, inde somnia furoresque, inde pseudomenoe et soritae in illius causae patrocinio uiguerunt. et cum ab eodem Zenone accepissent nihil esse turpius quam opinari, confecerunt callidissime, ut, si nihil percipi posset et esset opinatio turpissima, nihil umquam sapiens approbaret. Hinc eis inuidia magna conflata est; uidebatur enim esse consequens, ut nihil ageret qui nihil adprobaret. unde dormientem semper et officiorum omnium desertorem sapientem tuum Academici describere uidebantur, quem nihil adprobare censebant.
「由此而有感官的欺騙;由此而有夢境與狂亂;由此而有『說謊者悖論』與『連鎖論證』在那主張的辯護中興盛起來。而既然他們從同一位芝諾領受了『沒有甚麼比持守臆見更卑下』,便極其狡黠地推論出:倘若甚麼都不能被知覺,而臆見又是最卑下之事,那麼智者便永不贊同任何事。由此對他們激起了極大的反感;因為看來隨之而來的結論是:一個甚麼都不贊同的人,便甚麼都不做。因此學園派彷彿把你們的智者描繪成一個始終沉睡、拋棄一切本分的人,他們認定他甚麼都不贊同。」
'Thence the deceptions of the senses; thence dreams and frenzies; thence the liar-paradox and the sorites flourished in defence of that cause. And since they had received from the same Zeno that nothing is baser than to hold mere opinion, they concluded most cunningly that, if nothing can be perceived and opinion is the basest thing, the wise man will never approve anything. Hence great ill-will was stirred up against them; for it seemed to follow that a man who approved nothing would do nothing. Whence the Academics seemed to describe your wise man as ever sleeping and a deserter of all duties, whom they judged to approve of nothing.'
8:86
hic illi inducto quodam probabili, quod etiam ueri simile nominabant, nullo modo cessare sapientem ab officiis asserebant, cum haberet quid sequeretur, ueritas autem siue propter naturae tenebras quasdam siue propter similitudinem rerum uel obruta uel confusa latitaret, quamuis et ipsam refrenationem et quasi suspensionem assensionis prorsus magnam actionem sapientis esse dicebant. uideor mihi breuiter totum, ut uoluisti, exposuisse nihilque recessisse a praescriptione, Alypi, tua, id est egisse, ut dicitur, bona fide. si enim aliquid uel non ita, ut est, dixi uel forte non dixi, nihil uoluntate a me factum est. bona ergo fides est ex animi sententia.
「在此他們引入某種『可信的(probabile)』——也稱之為『近乎真的』——並主張智者絕不因此而停止其本分,因為他有可跟隨之物;至於真理,或因自然的某些陰影,或因事物的相似,或被淹沒、或被混淆而隱匿。然而他們說,即便這對贊同的抑制、彷彿是懸置,其本身也是智者的一大作為。阿呂皮烏斯啊,我覺得自己已照你所願簡要地陳明了全部,並且沒有在任何一點上背離你的規定——也就是說,正如常言所謂,憑信實而行。因為倘若我說了甚麼與實情不符之處,或許有所遺漏,那也絕非我出於故意而為。所以,信實乃在乎心意的本旨。」
'Here they, introducing a certain 'probable,' which they also named 'truth-like,' asserted that the wise man in no way ceases from his duties, since he has something to follow — while truth, whether because of certain shadows of nature or because of the resemblance of things, lay hidden, either overwhelmed or confused. Yet they said that even this reining-in and, as it were, suspension of assent was in itself a great action of the wise man. I seem to myself to have set forth the whole briefly, as you wished, and to have departed in nothing from your prescription, Alypius — that is, to have acted, as it is said, in good faith. For if I have said anything either not as it is, or perhaps have failed to say it, nothing has been done by me willingly. Good faith, then, is according to the mind's intention.'
8:87
homini enim homo falsus docendus, fallax cauendus debet uideri, quorum prius magistrum bonum, posterius discipulum cautum desiderat. Tum Alypius: Gratum, inquit, habeo, cum et Licentio a te satisfactum est et me onere inposito releuasti. non enim magis tibi uerendum erat, ne quid explorandi mei causa minus a te diceretur - nam alio modo qui fieri poterat? — quam mihi, si in quoquam te prodere fuisset necesse. quare faxis, ut illud quod deest non tam percontationi quam ipsi percontanti de differentia nouae ac ueteris Academiae ne te pigeat exponere. — Prorsus. inquam, fateor, piget.
「因為對人而言,一個說假話的人應被看作有待教導者,一個行詭詐的人應被看作須提防者;前者需要良師,後者需要謹慎的學生。」隨後阿呂皮烏斯說:「我很感激,因為你既滿足了利肯提烏斯,又卸去了加在我身上的重擔。因為你不必更擔憂你為試探我而說得太少——不然還能怎麼做呢?——正如我不必擔憂萬一在某事上非揭發你不可。所以,請你成全,將所缺的——與其說是這探問所缺的,不如說是探問者本人所缺的——即關於新學園與舊學園之差別,不厭其煩地為我講解。」我說:「我坦白承認,我不情願。」
'For to a man, a false man ought to seem one to be taught, a deceitful man one to be guarded against; of these, the former requires a good teacher, the latter a cautious pupil.' Then Alypius said: 'I am grateful, since you have both satisfied Licentius and relieved me of the burden laid upon me. For you had no more to fear lest something be said by you too little for the sake of testing me — for how else could it have been done? — than I had, if it had been necessary in anything to betray you. Wherefore, do bring it about that what is lacking — not so much to the inquiry as to the inquirer himself — you may not be loath to expound: I mean, concerning the difference between the New and the Old Academy.' 'I confess outright,' said I, 'that I am loath.'
8:88
quare beneficium dederis — nam hoc quod commemoras ad rem maxime pertinere negare non possum — si me paululum conquiescente apud me distinguere ista nomina et causam nouae Academiae aperire uolueris. — Crederem, inquit, me quoque a prandio te auocare uoluisse, ni et magis a Licentio territum dudum putarem et eius postulatio ita nobis praescripsisset, ut ei ante prandium quidquid huius inuolutionis esset expediretur. — Et cum reliqua dicere tenderet, mater nostra — nam domi iam eramus — ita nos trudere in prandium coepit, ut uerba faciendi locus non esset. Deinde, cum tantum alimentorum accepissemus, quantum compescendae fami satis esset. ad pratum regressis nobis Alypius:
「所以你就施了我一個恩惠——因為我不能否認你所提的正與此事最為相干——倘若你肯在我略作歇息、自省之際,將這些名稱加以區分,並揭明新學園的緣由。」他說:「我本要相信我自己也想把你從午餐邊叫開,若不是我覺得你方才反倒是被利肯提烏斯嚇退了,而他的請求已為我們規定:這團糾結中無論有甚麼,都當在午餐前為他解開。」正當他要接著說下去時,我們的母親——因為我們此時已在家中——便催促我們去用午餐,催得竟連說話的餘地都沒有了。隨後,我們用了足以抑制飢餓的飲食,回到草場,阿呂皮烏斯說:「
'Wherefore you will have done me a kindness — for I cannot deny that what you mention pertains most of all to the matter — if, while I take a little rest with myself, you should be willing to distinguish these names and to lay open the cause of the New Academy.' 'I would believe,' said he, 'that I too wished to call you away from lunch, did I not think that just now you were rather frightened off by Licentius, and that his request had prescribed to us that whatever there is of this tangle should be unravelled for him before lunch.' And as he was pressing on to say the rest, our mother — for we were now at home — began to push us in to lunch in such a way that there was no room for making words. Then, after we had taken as much nourishment as was enough to restrain hunger, and had returned to the meadow, Alypius said:
8:89
Paream, inquit, sententiae tuae nec ausim recusare. si enim nihil me fugerit, gratabor cum doctrinae tuae tum etiam memoriae meae. at si in quoquam fortasse aberrauero, recurabis id, ut deinceps huius modi delegationem non pertimescam. nouae Academiae discidium non tam contra ueterem conceptum quam contra Stoicos arbitror esse commotum. nec uero discidium putandum, si quidem a Zenone inlatam nouam quaestionem dissolui discutique oportebat. nam de non percipiendo quamuis nullis conflictationibus agitata, incolens tamen etiam ueterum Academicorum mentes sententia non inpudenter existimata est.
「我要順服你的判斷,不敢推辭。因為倘若沒有甚麼從我這裡溜走,我便要既為你的學識、也為我自己的記性而喜樂。但倘若我在某處偶然走岔了,你就更正它,好叫我此後不致懼怕這一類的委任。我判斷,新學園的分裂,與其說是針對如其原初所構想的舊學園而起,不如說是針對斯多亞派而起。而這其實也不當被視為分裂,既然芝諾所帶進的那新問題本就需要被解決、被辯論到底。因為關於『不能知覺』一事——雖未經任何爭執所激盪——那意見卻仍存留在古學園派人的心中,並非狂妄地被持守。」
'I shall obey your judgment and shall not dare to refuse. For if nothing escapes me, I shall rejoice both in your learning and in my own memory. But if perchance I stray in anything, you will correct it, so that henceforth I may not dread a commission of this kind. I judge that the schism of the New Academy was stirred up not so much against the Old, as it was conceived, as against the Stoics. Nor indeed is it to be thought a schism, if indeed the new question brought in by Zeno needed to be resolved and thrashed out. For concerning the non-perceiving — though agitated by no conflicts — the opinion, nonetheless dwelling even in the minds of the ancient Academics, was not immodestly held.'
8:90
quod etiam ipsius Socratis Platonisque ac reliquorum ueterum auctoritate probatu facile est, qui se hactenus crediderunt posse ab errore defendi, si se assensioni non temere commisissent, quamuis propriam de hac re disputationem in scholas suas non introduxerint nec ab illis enucleate aliquando quaesitum sit, percipi necne ueritas possit. quod cum Zeno rude ac nouum intulisset contenderetque nihil percipi posse, nisi quod uerum ita esset, ut dissimilibus notis a falso discerneretur, neque opinationem subeundam esse sapienti atque id Arcesilas audiret, negauit huius modi quidquam posse ab homine reperiri neque illi opinionis naufragio sapientis committendam esse uitam.
「這一點,甚至藉蘇格拉底本人、柏拉圖以及其餘古人的權威也易於證明;他們相信,若不曾輕率地讓自己陷入贊同,便可到此地步被保守脫離錯誤——儘管他們並未把關於此事的正式論辯引入自己的學派,他們也從未透徹地探問過真理究竟能否被知覺。而當芝諾把這作為某種粗糙而新奇之物帶進來,主張除非某物真到能藉不相似的記號與虛假分辨開來,否則甚麼都不能被知覺,並且智者不當持守任何臆見——阿爾克西拉斯聽了這話,便否認人能尋得任何這類之物,也否認智者的人生當被託付於臆見的沉船之上。」
'This is easily proved even by the authority of Socrates himself and of Plato and of the rest of the ancients, who believed that they could thus far be defended from error, if they had not rashly committed themselves to assent — although they did not introduce a proper disputation on this matter into their schools, nor was it ever inquired by them in a thorough way whether truth can be perceived or not. And when Zeno had brought this in as something crude and new, and contended that nothing can be perceived except what is so true that it may be distinguished from the false by dissimilar marks, and that no opinion is to be undertaken by the wise man — and Arcesilas heard this — he denied that anything of this kind could be found by man, and that the wise man's life was to be committed to the shipwreck of opinion.'
8:91
unde etiam conclusit nulli rei esse adsentiendum. Uerum cum ita res se habeat, ut uetus Academia magis aucta quam oppugnata uideretur, extitit Philonis auditor Antiochus, qui. ut nonnullis uisus est, gloriae cupidior quam ueritatis in simultatem adduxit Academiae utriusque sententias. dicebat enim rem insolitam et ab opinione ueterum remotissimam Academicos nouos conatos inducere.
「由此他還推論出:對任何事都不當給予贊同。但既然事態如此——舊學園顯得寧可說是被增益而非被攻擊——於是安提俄庫斯興起,他是斐洛的門徒,有些人看來,他貪慕榮耀過於真理,竟使兩個學園的主張相互為敵。因為他說,新學園派人企圖引入一種前所未聞、與古人的意見最為疏遠之事。」
'Whence he also concluded that assent is to be given to nothing. But since the matter so stood that the Old Academy seemed rather augmented than assailed, there arose Antiochus, a hearer of Philo, who — as he seemed to some, more desirous of glory than of truth — brought the opinions of both Academies into feud. For he said that the New Academics had attempted to introduce a thing unwonted and most remote from the opinion of the ancients.'
8:92
in quam rem ueterum physicorum aliorumque magnorum philosophorum inplorabat fidem ipsos etiam Academicos oppugnans, qui se ueri simile contenderent sequi, cum ipsum uerum se ignorare faterentur, multaque argumenta collegerat, quibus nunc supersedendum arbitror, nihil tamen magis defendebat quam percipere posse sapientem. hanc puto inter Academicos nouos ac ueteres controuersiam fuisse. quae si secus se habet, ut Licentium plenissime informes pro utroque postulauerim. si uero ita est, ut dicere potui. susceptam disputationem peragite. Tum ego: Quamdiu, inquam, Licenti, in isto nostro longiore quam putabam sermone conquiescis ? audisti, qui sint Academici tui?
「為此事他懇求古代自然哲學家以及其他偉大哲學家的信實為助,甚至攻擊學園派本身——他們自稱跟隨那近乎真的,卻承認自己對真理本身一無所知——他還蒐集了許多論據,我認為如今應予略過,然而他所最力主的,莫過於『智者能夠知覺』。我認為,這就是新舊學園派之間的爭論所在。倘若情形並非如此,我倒要請你為雙方詳盡地教導利肯提烏斯。但倘若正如我方才所能陳述的那樣,就請把你所承擔的論辯進行到底。」隨後我說:「利肯提烏斯啊,你要在我們這番比我所料更長的談話中歇息到幾時呢?你已聽見你的學園派人是誰了嗎?」
'For this matter he implored the good faith of the ancient natural philosophers and of the other great philosophers, attacking even the Academics themselves — who contended that they followed the truth-like, while confessing that they were ignorant of the truth itself — and he had gathered many arguments, over which I now think we should pass, yet he defended nothing more strongly than that the wise man can perceive. This, I think, was the controversy between the New Academics and the Old. If it is otherwise, I would ask that you fully instruct Licentius on behalf of both parties. But if it is as I have been able to state, carry through the disputation you have undertaken.' Then I said: 'How long, Licentius, will you rest in this discourse of ours, longer than I thought? You have heard who your Academics are?'
8:93
— At ille uerecunde adridens et aliquantum hac compellatione turbatior: Paenitet me, inquit, tanto opere adfirmasse contra Trygetium beatam uitam in ueritatis inquisitione consistere. nam me ista quaestio ita perturbat, ut uix non miser sim, qui certe uobis, si quid humanitatis geritis, uideor miserandus. sed quid me ipse ineptus crucio? aut quid exhorreo tanta causae bonitate subnixus? prorsus non cedam nisi ueritati. — Placentne. inquam, tibi noui Academici ? — Plurimum, inquit. — Ergo uerum tibi uidentur dicere? — Tum ille cum iam esset assensurus arrisione Alypii cautior factus haesit aliquantum et deinde: Repete, inquit, rogatiunculam. —Verumnc, inquam, tibi uidentur Academici dicere?
但他羞澀地微笑,被這番招呼弄得有些不安,說道:「我懊悔自己曾如此激烈地對特呂革提烏斯斷言,說幸福的人生在於對真理的探求。因為這問題如此困擾我,以致我幾乎成了可憐之人——我在你們看來,倘若你們懷有半點人情,確是可憐憫的。但我這愚人,為何自尋苦惱呢?或者,我既有這般美好的理由支撐,又為何驚懼?我斷不退讓,除非向真理退讓。」我說:「新學園派討你喜歡嗎?」他說:「非常喜歡。」「那麼他們在你看來說得是真的嗎?」隨後他正要表示贊同,卻因阿呂皮烏斯的微笑變得更謹慎,猶豫了片刻,然後說:「把你那小問題再說一遍。」我說:「學園派在你看來說得是真的嗎?」
But he, smiling shyly and somewhat disturbed by this address, said: 'It grieves me that I so vehemently affirmed, against Trygetius, that the happy life consists in the search for truth. For this question so troubles me that I am almost wretched — I who certainly seem to you, if you bear any humanity, worthy of pity. But why do I, foolish, torment myself? Or why do I shudder, upheld by so good a cause? I shall utterly not yield except to the truth.' 'Do the New Academics please you?' I said. 'Very much,' said he. 'Do they then seem to you to speak truly?' Then he, being now about to assent, made more cautious by Alypius' smile, hesitated a little and then said: 'Repeat your little question.' 'Do the Academics,' I said, 'seem to you to speak truly?'
8:94
— Et rursus cum diu tacuisset: Utrum, ait, uerum sit, nescio; pro babile est tamen. neque enim plus uideo quod sequar. — Probabil inquam, scisne ab ipsis etiam ueri simile nominari? — Ita, inquit uidetur. — Ergo, inquam, ueri similis est Academicorum sententia. — Ita, inquit. — Quaeso attende, inquam, diligentius. si quisquam fratrem tuum uisum patris tui similem esse affirmet ipsumque tuum patrem non nouerit, nonne tibi insanus aut ineptus uidebitur? — Et hic diu tacuit; tum ait: Non mihi hoc uidetur absurdum. Cui ego cum respondere coepissem: Expecta, inquit, quaeso paululum. ac post arridens: Dic mihi, ait, oro te, iamne certus es de uictoria tua ? — Tum ego: Fac me, inquam, certum esse;
他又沉默良久,然後說:「它是否為真,我不知道;但它終究是可信的。因為我看不見更有甚麼可跟隨的。」我說:「那麼你知道,正是這『可信(probabile)』一詞,也被他們稱作『近乎真的』嗎?」他說:「看來如此。」我說:「所以,學園派的主張乃是近乎真的。」他說:「正是如此。」我說:「請你更仔細地留意。倘若有人斷言你的兄弟像你的父親,卻並不認得你父親本人,他在你看來豈不顯得瘋狂或愚蠢嗎?」在此他又沉默良久,然後說:「這在我看來並不荒謬。」而當我開始回答他時,他說:「求你稍等片刻」;隨後微笑著說:「我求你告訴我,你如今對自己的勝利有把握了嗎?」我便說:「就算我有把握吧;
And again, after he had long been silent, he said: 'Whether it is true, I do not know; nevertheless it is probable. For I see nothing further that I might follow.' 'Do you know, then,' I said, 'that the very word probable is also named by them truth-like?' 'So it seems,' he said. 'Therefore,' I said, 'the opinion of the Academics is truth-like.' 'So it is,' he said. 'I beg you,' I said, 'attend more carefully. If anyone affirmed that your brother was like your father, but did not know your father himself, would he not seem to you insane or foolish?' And here he was long silent; then he said: 'This does not seem absurd to me.' And when I had begun to answer him: 'Wait, I beg you, a little,' he said; and then, smiling: 'Tell me, I pray you, are you now certain of your victory?' Then I said: 'Grant that I am certain;'
8:95
non ideo tamen tu causam tuam debes deserere, praesertim cum haec inter nos disputatio suscepta sit exercendi tui causa et ad elimandum animum prouocandi. — Numquidnam, inquit, aut Academicos legi aut tot disciplinis eruditus sum, quibus tu ad me instructus aduentas? — Academicos, inquam, nec illi legerant, a quibus primo sententia ista defensa est. eruditio autem disciplinarumque copia si te deficit, non usque adeo tamen ingenium tuum esse debet inualidum, ut nullo facto impetu paucissimis uerbis meis rogationibusque succumbas. illud enim iam uereri coepi, ne tibi citius quam uolo succedat Alypius, quo aduersario non ita securus deambulabo.
「你也不當因此便拋棄你的主張,尤其因為我們之間承擔這場論辯,正是為了鍛鍊你、激勵你磨礪心智。」他說:「難道我讀過學園派的書,或者受過那許多學科的訓練——就是你裝備齊全來對付我所憑藉的那些?」我說:「學園派的書,就連那些最先為這主張辯護的人也未曾讀過。但倘若學問與各樣學科的豐富於你有所缺乏,你的天賦卻也不當如此軟弱,以致未經任何攻擊,便向我這寥寥數語與問話俯首屈服。因為我如今已開始擔憂,唯恐阿呂皮烏斯比我所願的更早接替你——面對那樣的對手,我散步時可不能如此無憂了。」
'yet you ought not on that account to desert your cause, especially since this disputation has been undertaken among us for the sake of exercising you and provoking you to polish your mind.' 'Have I,' said he, 'either read the Academics, or been trained in the many disciplines with which you come to me equipped?' 'The Academics,' I said, 'neither had those men read by whom this opinion was first defended. But if learning and abundance of disciplines fail you, your natural talent nevertheless ought not to be so feeble that, without any assault made, you should succumb to my very few words and questions. For I have now begun to fear that Alypius may succeed you sooner than I wish — with which adversary I shall not walk about so free of care.'
8:96
— Ergo utinam, inquit ille, iam uincar, ut aliquando uos audiam disserentes et, quod plus est, uideam, quo mihi spectaculo nihil potest felicius exhiberi. nam quoniam placuit uobis ista fundere potius quam effundere, si quidem ore prorumpentia stilo excipitis nec in terram, ut dicitur, cadere sinitis, legere etiam uos licebit; sed nescio quo modo, cum admouentur oculis idem ipsi, quos inter sermo caeditur, bona disputatio si non utilius, at certe laetius perfundit animum, Gratum habemus, inquam; sed repentina ista gaudia tua temere illam sententiam euadere coegerunt, qua dixisti nullum tibi spectaculum exhiberi posse felicius. quid, si enim patrem illum tuum.
他說:「那麼但願我如今就被征服,好叫我有朝一日能聽你們論辯,更能——這是更甚的——親眼看見你們;再沒有比這更幸福的場面能展示給我了。因為既然你們樂意將這些話傾倒出來、而非傾瀉而盡——倘若你們果真用筆捕住從口中迸出的言語,不容它們如常言所謂落在地上——那我們甚至也得以讀到它們;但不知怎地,當那些論辯在其間展開的同一批人被帶到眼前時,一場好的論辯即便不更有益,至少也更歡欣地灌注人的心靈。」我說:「我們很感激;但你這突如其來的喜樂,已莽撞地逼你溜過了你方才那句話——你說再沒有比這更幸福的場面能展示給你。那麼,倘若你竟看見你那位父親——
'Then would that,' said he, 'I might already be conquered, so that at some time I may hear you disputing, and, what is more, may see you — a spectacle than which nothing more happy can be shown to me. For since it has pleased you to pour out these things rather than to pour them away — if indeed you catch with the pen the words bursting from your mouth, and do not let them fall, as they say, to the ground — it will even be permitted us to read them; but somehow, when the very same persons among whom the discourse is struck out are brought before the eyes, a good disputation, if not more usefully, at least more joyfully floods the soul.' 'We are grateful,' I said; 'but these sudden joys of yours have rashly forced you to slip past that opinion by which you said that no spectacle could be shown to you more happy. What, indeed, if you were to see that father of yours' —
8:97
quo profecto nemo philosophiam est post tam longam sitim hausturus ardentius, nobiscum ista quaerentem ac disserentem uidebis. cum ego me fortunatiorem numquam putabo, quid te tandem sentire ac dicere conuenit? — Hic uero ille aliquantum lacrimauit et, ubi loqui potuit, porrecta manu caelum suspiciens: Et quando ego, inquit, deus, hoc uidebo? sed nihil est de te desperandum. — Hic cum paene omnes ab intentione disputationis dimitti in lacrimas coepissemus, obluctans mecum et uix me colligens: Age potius. inquam, et in uires tuas redi, quas ut congereres undeunde posses patronus Academiae futurus, longe ante monueram.
「——他在這般長久的乾渴之後,必比任何人都更熱切地暢飲哲學——與我們一同探問並論辯這些事,那時我必永不覺得自己更為有福:那麼,你當懷有並說出甚麼感受,才是相宜的呢?」在此那人確實有些落淚,待他能言時,便伸手仰望天空,說道:「神啊,我幾時才能看見這事呢?」——「但關乎你,斷不可絕望。」在此,當我們幾乎所有人都開始從論辯的緊張中鬆脫、化為淚水時,我強自克制、勉力收攏自己,說道:「你倒不如振作起來,回到你的力量中——我早已警告過你,你既要作學園的護衛者,就當從無論何處把這力量聚集起來。」
'than whom assuredly no one, after so long a thirst, will drink philosophy more ardently — inquiring and disputing about these things together with us, when I shall never think myself more fortunate: what, pray, is it fitting for you to feel and to say?' Here indeed that man wept somewhat, and, when he could speak, stretching out his hand and looking up to heaven, he said: 'And when, O God, shall I see this?' — 'But nothing is to be despaired of concerning you.' Here, when almost all of us had begun to be released from the intensity of the disputation into tears, struggling against me and scarcely collecting myself, I said: 'Come rather, and return to your strength, which — that you might gather it from wheresoever you could, being about to be the patron of the Academy — I had warned you long before.'
8:98
non opinor ideo, ut modo ante tubam tremor occupet artus aut ut uisendae alienae pugnae desiderio tam cito te optes esse captiuum. — Hic Trygetius, ubi satis attendit iam uultus nostros serenatos: Quidni iste optet, inquit, homo tam sanctus, ut hoc ei deus ante uota concesserit? crede iam, Licenti; nam qui non inuenis quid respondeas, et adhuc ut uincare optas, paruae fidei mihi uideris. — Arrisimus. — Tum Licentius: Loquere beatus, inquit. non inueniendo uerum, sed certe non quaerendo. Qua hilaritate adulescentulorum cum essemus laetiores: Attende, inquam, rogationem et in uiam firmior et ualentior redi, si potes. — En adsum, inquit, quantum possum. quid enim.
「我想情形並非這樣:就在此刻、在號角未響之前,戰慄便攫住你的肢體,或者你出於觀看他人爭鬥的渴望,便如此迅速地情願自己成為俘虜。」在此特呂革提烏斯,待他充分注意到我們的面容此時已然平和,便說:「這人為何不該情願呢,他這般聖潔,以致神在他祈求之先便已賜給了他這事?利肯提烏斯啊,如今就信吧;因為你既找不出可回答的話,卻仍願被征服,在我看來便是小信的人。」我們笑了。隨後利肯提烏斯說:「有福之人啊,你說吧——不是藉尋得真理,而至少是藉不去尋求它。」而當我們因這些少年人的歡快變得更加愉悅時,我說:「留意這問題,倘若你能,就更堅固、更有力地回到路上來。」他說:「看哪,我在此,盡我所能。因為有甚麼——
'I do not think it is so that, just now, before the trumpet, trembling should seize your limbs, or that, from a desire to behold another's fight, you should so quickly wish yourself to be a captive.' Here Trygetius, when he had sufficiently noted that our faces were now serene, said: 'Why should not this man wish it, so holy a man that God has granted him this before his prayers? Believe already, Licentius; for you who find nothing to answer, and still wish to be conquered, seem to me of little faith.' We smiled. Then Licentius said: 'Speak, O blessed one — not by finding the truth, but at least by not seeking it.' And when, at the gaiety of the young men, we had become more cheerful, I said: 'Attend to the question, and return to the path firmer and stronger, if you can.' 'Behold, here I am,' said he, 'as much as I can be. For what' —
8:99
si ille fratris mei uisor fama compertum habeat cum esse similem patris, potest insanus aut ineptus esse, si credit? — Stultusne, inquam, saltem dici potest? — K on continuo, inquit, nisi se id scire contenderit. nam si ut probabile sequitur quod crebra fama iactauit, nullius temeritatis argui potest. — Tum ego: Rem ipsam paulisper consideremus et quasi ante oculos constituamus. ecce fac illum nescio quem hominem, quem describimus, esse praesentem; aduenit alicunde frater tuus. ibi iste: cuius hic puer filius? respondetur: cuiusdam Romaniani. at hic: quam patris similis est! quam non temere hoc ad me fama detulerat! hic tu uel quis alius: nosti enim Romanianum, bone homo ? non noui, inquit;
「——倘若那看見我兄弟的人藉傳聞得知他像他父親,他若信了,能算是瘋狂或愚蠢嗎?」我說:「他至少能被稱為愚笨嗎?」他說:「不立刻算,除非他堅稱自己知道這事。因為倘若他只是把頻繁的傳聞所散布的當作可信之事而跟隨,他便不能被指為任何輕率。」我便說:「讓我們稍稍思考這件事本身,並彷彿把它擺在眼前。看哪,假設我們所描述的那人在場;你的兄弟從某處來到。那時這人說:這孩子是誰的兒子?有人回答:是某位羅馬尼亞努斯的。可他說:他多麼像他父親啊!傳聞把這事帶給我,何等不虛!這時你或別的甚麼人說:好人哪,你認得羅馬尼亞努斯嗎?他說:我不認得;
'if that seer of my brother should have learned by report that he is like his father, can he be insane or foolish if he believes it?' 'Can he,' I said, 'at least be called stupid?' 'Not at once,' he said, 'unless he should contend that he knows it. For if he follows as probable what frequent report has bandied about, he can be charged with no rashness.' Then I said: 'Let us for a little consider the matter itself, and set it, as it were, before our eyes. Behold, suppose that man of ours, whom we describe, to be present; your brother arrives from somewhere. There this fellow says: whose son is this boy? It is answered: a certain Romanianus'. But he says: how like his father he is! how not rashly had report brought this to me! Here you or someone else: do you know Romanianus, good man? I do not know him, he says;'
8:100
tamen similis eius mihi uidetur. poteritne quisquam risum tenere? — Nullo modo, inquit. — Ergo, inquam, quid sequatur uides. — Iam dudum, inquit, uideo. sed tamen ipsam conclusionem abs te audire uolo; oportet enim alere incipias quem cepisti. — Quidni, inquam, concludam ? ipsa res clamat similiter ridendos esse Academicos tuos, qui se in uita ueri similitudinem sequi dicunt, cum ipsum uerum quod sit ignorent. Tum Trygetius: Longe mihi, inquit, uidetur dissimilis Academicorum cautio ab huius quem descripsistis ineptia. illi enim rationibus assequuntur quod dicunt esse ueri simile, iste autem ineptus famam secutus est, cuius auctoritate nihil est uilius.
「他在我看來卻像他。有誰能忍住不笑呢?」他說:「斷斷不能。」我說:「所以,你看出隨之而來的結論了。」他說:「我早已看出來了;但我仍願從你口中聽見那結論本身;因為你既擄了他,理當開始餵養他。」我說:「我為何不作結呢?事情本身在呼喊:你的學園派人同樣可笑,他們自稱在人生中跟隨真理的相似,卻不知道真理本身是甚麼。」隨後特呂革提烏斯說:「學園派的審慎,在我看來與你所描述那人的愚蠢大不相同。因為他們是藉推理達致他們所謂近乎真的,而那愚人卻是跟從傳聞,再沒有甚麼比傳聞的權威更廉價的了。」
'nevertheless he seems to me like him. Could anyone hold back laughter?' 'By no means,' said he. 'Therefore,' I said, 'you see what follows.' 'I have seen it this long while,' he said; 'but nevertheless I wish to hear the very conclusion from you; for it is fitting that you begin to nourish him whom you have taken captive.' 'Why should I not,' I said, 'conclude? The matter itself cries out that your Academics are to be laughed at in like manner, who say they follow in life the likeness of truth, while they are ignorant of what the truth itself is.' Then Trygetius said: 'The caution of the Academics seems to me far unlike the foolishness of this man whom you have described. For they by reasonings attain what they say is truth-like, whereas that foolish fellow followed report, than whose authority nothing is cheaper.'
8:101
— Quasi uero, inquam, non esset ineptior, si diceret: patrem quidem eius minime noui nec fama comperi, quam sit similis patri; sed mihi tamen similis uidetur. — Ineptior certe, inquit. sed quorsum ista? — Quia tales, inquam, sunt qui dicunt: uerum quidem non nouimus, sed hoc quod uidemus eius quod non nouimus simile est. — Probabile, inquit, illi dicunt. — Cui ego: Quomodo istuc dicis? an negas eos ueri simile dicere? — Et ille: Ego, inquit, ob hoc dicere uolui, ut illam similitudinem excluderem. uidebatur enim mihi fama inprobe inruisse in quaestionem uestram, cum Academici ne oculis quidem credant humanis, nedum famae mille quidem, ut poetae fingunt, sed monstrosis tamen luminibus.
我說:「彷彿他若這樣說便不算更愚蠢似的:他父親我根本不認得,也未曾藉傳聞得知他多麼像他父親;然而他在我看來卻像他。」他說:「當然是更愚蠢。但這些話有何目的?」我說:「因為那些人正是如此,他們說:真理我們固然不知道,但我們所看見的,卻像那我們所不知道的。」他說:「他們所說的乃是可信的。」我對他說:「你這話是甚麼意思?你否認他們稱之為『近乎真的』嗎?」他說:「我之所以想這樣說,是為要排除那個『相似』。因為在我看來,傳聞不當地闖進了你們的問題,既然學園派連人的眼睛都不信任,更何況傳聞——傳聞倒不是詩人所虛構的千眼,卻同樣長著怪異的目光。」
'As if, indeed,' I said, 'he were not more foolish if he said: his father I do not at all know, nor have I learned by report how like his father he is; yet nevertheless he seems to me like him.' 'More foolish, certainly,' he said. 'But to what end are these things?' 'Because,' I said, 'such are those who say: the truth indeed we do not know, but this which we see is like that which we do not know.' 'It is probable,' he said, 'that they say.' To whom I: 'How do you mean that? Do you deny that they call it truth-like?' And he: 'I,' said he, 'wished to say this in order to exclude that likeness. For it seemed to me that report had improperly burst into your question, since the Academics do not trust even human eyes, much less report — not indeed a thousand-eyed one, as the poets feign, but with monstrous lights all the same.'
8:102
nam quis ego tandem sum Academiae defensor? an in quacstione ista inuidetis securitati meae? en habes Alypium, cuius aduentus nobis quaeso ferias dederit, quem te iam dudum non frustra formidare arbitremur. Tum facto silentio oculos ambo in Alypium contulerunt. tum ille: Uellem quidem, inquit, ut meae uires patiuntur, auxiliari aliquatenus partibus uestris, nisi mihi omen uestrum terrori esset. sed hanc formidinem, ni me spes fefellerit, facile fugem. simul enim solatur me, quod praesens Academicorum oppugnator onus Trygetii uicti paene subierit, et nunc cur. uictorem uestra confessione probabile est.
「因為我究竟算甚麼,配作學園的護衛者呢?還是說,在這問題上你們嫉妒我的安穩?看哪,你們有阿呂皮烏斯,我求他的到來已給了我們一個假期——我們可以斷定,你們這許久以來提防他,並非徒然。」隨後眾人靜默,二人都把目光投向阿呂皮烏斯。他便說:「我確實願意,在我力量所及的範圍內,多少援助你們這一方,若不是你們那預兆令我恐懼。但這恐懼,若非盼望欺哄了我,我將輕易把它驅走。因為它一面立時安慰我——如今學園派的攻擊者幾乎接下了被征服的特呂革提烏斯的重擔;而此刻,照你們自己的承認,我是得勝者,這乃是可信的。」
'For who am I, after all, to be a defender of the Academy? Or in this question do you envy my security? Behold, you have Alypius, whose arrival, I pray, may have given us a holiday — whom we may judge you have not vainly dreaded this long while.' Then, silence being made, they both turned their eyes upon Alypius. Then he said: 'I could wish indeed, as far as my strength allows, to aid your side to some extent, were not your omen a terror to me. But this dread, unless hope has deceived me, I shall easily put to flight. For at once it consoles me that the present assailant of the Academics has almost taken up the burden of the vanquished Trygetius; and now that it is probable, by your own confession, that I am the victor.'
8:103
illud magis uereor, ue et deserti officii neglegentiam et inuasi inpudentiam deuitare non possim. non enim uos oblitos credo iudicis mihi munus fuisse delatum. — Hic Trygetius: Illud. inquit, aliud, hoc autem aliud est; quare quaesumus, ut te aliquando patiare priuatum. — Ne rennuerim, ait, nc, cum inpudentiam uel neglegentiam uitare cupio, in superbiae, quo uitio nihil est inmanius, laqueos incidam, si honorem mihi a nobis concessum diutius quam permittitis teneam. Proinde uelim mihi exponas, bone accusator Acadcmicorum, officium tuum, id est, in quorum defensione hos oppugnes. metuo enim, ne Academicos refellens Academicum te probare uelis. — Accusatorum.
「我更害怕的,是唯恐我既不能避免棄職之疏忽,又不能避免僭職之無恥。因為我不信你們已忘記,審判者的職分曾指派給我。」在此特呂革提烏斯說:「那是一回事,這又是另一回事;所以我們懇求你,容你自己有時作個平民。」他說:「那我便不推辭,免得我在渴望避免無恥或疏忽之際,反倒落入驕傲的網羅——沒有甚麼惡習比驕傲更兇殘——倘若我把你們所賜給我的尊榮持守得比你們所允許的更久。因此,學園派的好控告者啊,我倒願你為我講明你的職守——就是說,你攻擊這些人,是在為誰辯護。因為我擔憂,唯恐你在駁斥學園派時,反倒願證明自己是個學園派人。」「控告者——
'That which I fear more is lest I be unable to avoid both the negligence of a deserted office and the impudence of an usurped one. For I do not believe you have forgotten that the office of judge was assigned to me.' Here Trygetius said: 'That is one thing, and this another; wherefore we beg that you would at some time suffer yourself to be a private man.' 'Let me not refuse,' he said, 'lest, while I desire to avoid impudence or negligence, I fall into the snares of pride, than which vice nothing is more monstrous, should I hold the honour granted me by you longer than you permit. Accordingly I should wish you to expound to me, good accuser of the Academics, your office — that is, in whose defence you attack these men. For I fear lest, in refuting the Academics, you should wish to prove yourself an Academic.' 'Of accusers,' —
8:104
inquam, ut opinor, duo genera esse bene nosti. si enim a Cicerone modestissime dictum est ita cum esse Uerris accusatorem, ut Siculorum defensor esset, propterea necesse est eum, qui aliquem accuset. habere alterum, quem defendat. — Et ille: Saltem habesne tu quidquam, in quo sententia tua iam fundata constiterit ? — Facile est, inquam. huic rogationi respondere mihi praesertim. cui repentina non est; iam hoc totum mecum egi et diu multumque uersaui animo. quam ob rem audi, Alypi, quod, ut arbitror, iam optime scis: non ego istam disputationem disputandi gratia susceptam uolo. satis sit quod cum istis adulescentibus prolusimus, ubi libenter nobiscum philosophia quasi iocata est.
「——我想,」我說,「你深知有兩種。因為倘若西塞羅極謙遜地說過,他控告維勒斯乃是為要作西西里人的辯護者,那麼由此便必然:凡控告某人者,都當有另一位是他所辯護的。」他說:「那你至少有沒有甚麼是你的主張如今已穩固奠基於其上的?」我說:「這問題對我尤其易於回答,因為它對我並不突然;我早已在心中處理過這整件事,並在心裡長久而反覆地思量過它。所以,阿呂皮烏斯啊,請聽——我想你早已深知的:我不願這場論辯是為論辯本身而承擔的。我們與這些少年人作了這番前奏,讓哲學彷彿與我們歡快地嬉戲了一番,這也就夠了。
'as I suppose,' I said, 'you well know there are two kinds. For if it was said by Cicero most modestly that he was the accuser of Verres in such a way as to be the defender of the Sicilians, it is on that account necessary that he who accuses someone should have another whom he defends.' And he: 'Have you at least anything in which your opinion now stands firmly founded?' 'It is easy,' I said, 'for me especially to answer this question, which is not sudden to me; I have already dealt with this whole thing within myself and long and much turned it over in my mind. Wherefore hear, Alypius, what, as I think, you already know very well: I do not want this disputation to have been undertaken for the sake of disputing. Let it be enough that we have made our preludes with these youths, where philosophy has played, as it were, pleasantly with us.'
8:105
quare auferantur de manibus nostris fabellae pueriles. de uita nostra de moribus de animo res agitur, qui se superaturum inimicitias omnium fallaciarum et ueritate conprehensa quasi in regionem suae originis rediens triumphaturum de libidinibus atque ita temperantia uelut coniuge accepta regnaturum esse praesumit securior rediturus in caelum. uides quid dicam. tollamus iam cuncta ista de medio arma acri facienda uiro; nec quidquam mmus semper optau. quam inter eos, qui secum multum uixerunt multumque sermocinati sunt, oriri aliquid, unde nouus quasi conflictus exsurgat.
「所以,讓孩童的小故事從我們手中被拿走吧。這事關乎我們的人生、我們的品行、我們的靈魂;靈魂預料自己將勝過一切欺騙的仇敵,並且既把握了真理,便彷彿回返到自身本源的境域,將要凱旋於眾情慾之上,如此娶了節制為妻,便要作王掌權——註定要更加安穩地回返天上。你明白我所說的。讓我們如今從我們中間撤去那一切本該由兇猛之人揮舞的兵器;我從未有甚麼比這更不願意的:就是在那些長久同住、彼此多有交談之人中間,生出甚麼事來,好叫一場彷彿全新的衝突由此興起。」
'Wherefore let childish little tales be taken from our hands. The matter concerns our life, our morals, our soul, which presumes that it will overcome the enmities of all deceptions, and, having grasped the truth, as if returning into the region of its own origin, will triumph over the lusts, and thus, having received temperance as a spouse, will reign — destined to return more secure into heaven. You see what I say. Let us now take from our midst all those arms that are to be wielded by a fierce man; nor have I ever wished anything less than that, among those who have lived much together and conversed much, something should arise from which, as it were, a new conflict might spring up.'
8:106
sed propter memoriam, quae infida custos est excogitatorum, referri in litteras uolui, quod internos saepe pertractauimus, simul ut isti adulescentes et in haec attendere discerent et aggredi ac subire temtarent. Tune ergo nescis nihil me certum adhuc habere quod sentiam, sed ab eo quaerendo Academicorum argumentis atque disputationibus impediri? nescio quo enim modo fecerunt in animo quandam probabilitatem — ut ab eorum uerbo nondum recedam — quod homo uerum inue.nire non possit; unde piger et prorsus segnis effectus eram nec quaerere audebam, quod acutissimis ac doctissimis uiris inuenire non licuit.
「但為著記憶——它是所思構之事的不忠實看守者——我願把我們彼此屢次討論過的內容筆之於書,同時也好叫這些少年人既學會留意這些事,又能嘗試著手並承擔它們。那麼,你豈不知道,我對於自己該當如何思想,至今尚無任何確定,反倒被學園派的論證與論辯所攔阻,不敢去探究它?因為他們不知怎地在我心裡造成某種『可信』——容我暫且不脫離他們自己的用語——就是說,人不能尋得真理;由此我變得懶散、全然怠惰,不敢去探究那連最敏銳、最有學問的人也未蒙允許尋得之事。」
'But on account of memory, which is a faithless keeper of things devised, I wished to have set down in writing what we have often discussed among ourselves — at the same time, so that these young men might both learn to attend to these matters, and might attempt to approach and undertake them. Do you not then know that I hold nothing certain as yet as to what I should think, but am hindered from inquiring into it by the arguments and disputations of the Academics? For somehow they wrought in my mind a certain probability — that I may not yet withdraw from their own word — that a man cannot find the truth; whence I had become sluggish and utterly slothful, and dared not inquire into what it was not granted to the keenest and most learned men to find.'
8:107
nisi ergo prius tam mihi persuasero uerum posse inueniri, quam sibi illi non posse persuaserunt, non audebo quaerere nec habeo aliquid, quod defendam. itaque istam interrogationem remoue, si placet; potius discutiamus inter nos, quam sagaciter possumus, utrumnam possit uerum inueniri. et pro parte mea uideor mihi habere iam multa, quibus contra rationem Academicorum niti molior; inter quos et me modo interim nihil distat, nisi quod illis probabile uisum est non posse inueniri ueritatem, mihi autem inueniri posse probabile est. nam ignoratio ueri aut mihi. si illi fingebant, peculiaris est aut certe utrisque communis. Tum Alypius: Iam, inquit, securus incedam;
「所以,除非我先說服自己相信真理能被尋得,其確信程度不亞於他們說服自己相信真理不能被尋得,我便不敢去探究,也沒有甚麼可辯護的。所以,若你願意,就撤去那盤問吧;我們倒不如彼此之間盡我們所能地明智探討:真理究竟能否被尋得。而在我這一方,我覺得自己已有許多憑據,藉以竭力抵擋學園派的論理;在他們與我之間,此刻暫時並無差別,唯一的差別在於:對他們而言,真理不能被尋得乃是可信的;而對我而言,真理能被尋得乃是可信的。因為對真理的無知,或是我所獨有——倘若他們只是佯裝——或至少是我們雙方所共有的。」隨後阿呂皮烏斯說:「如今我便可無憂前進了;
'Unless, then, I first persuade myself that the truth can be found, as fully as they persuaded themselves that it cannot, I shall not dare to inquire, nor have I anything to defend. So remove that interrogation, if you please; rather let us discuss between ourselves, as sagaciously as we can, whether indeed the truth can be found. And on my side I seem to myself to have already many things by which I strive to press against the reasoning of the Academics; between whom and myself just now there is for the moment no difference, except that to them it seemed probable that the truth cannot be found, whereas to me it is probable that it can be found. For ignorance of the truth is either peculiar to me — if they were only feigning — or at least common to us both.' Then Alypius said: 'Now I shall advance free of care;'
8:108
uideo enim te non tam accusatorem quam adiutorem fore. itaque ne longius abeamus, uideamus quaeso prius, ne per hanc quaestionem, in qua successisse uideor his, qui tibi cesserunt, in uerbi controuersiam decidamus, quod te ipso insinuante et auctoritate illa Tulliana turpissimum esse saepe confessi sumus. cum enim, ni fallor, Licentius placuisse sibi diceret de probabilitate Academicorum sententiam, subiecisti, quod ille haud dubie confirmauit, sciretne hanc ab eisdem etiam ueri similitudinem nominari. et bene noui, si quidem ex te mihi nota sunt, non absque te esse Academicorum placita. quae cum, ut dixi, animo tuo infixa sint, quid uerba secteris ignoro.
「因為我看出你將不是控告者,而毋寧是幫助者。所以,為叫我們不至偏離太遠,我求你,讓我們先留意:不要藉這問題——在其中我彷彿已勝過那些向你屈服之人——竟落入一場關乎字詞的爭論;這樣的爭論,經你自己的提醒、並憑西塞羅那句名言的權威,我們屢次承認乃是最卑下的。因為當——若我沒有記錯——利肯提烏斯說學園派關於『可信』的主張討他喜歡時,你追問,而他也毫無疑問地確認:他是否知道這在他們也被稱作『近乎真的』。而我深知——倘若我這些確是從你學來的——學園派的信條與你並非無關。既然這些如我所說已牢牢固定在你心中,我便不明白你為何還要追逐字詞。」
'for I see that you will be not so much an accuser as a helper. And so, that we may not stray too far, let us first, I pray, see to it that through this question — in which I seem to have succeeded with those who yielded to you — we do not fall into a controversy about a word, which, at your own prompting and on the authority of that famous saying of Cicero, we have often confessed to be most base. For when — if I am not mistaken — Licentius said that the opinion about probability of the Academics pleased him, you added, and he without doubt confirmed it, whether he knew that this was also named by them truth-likeness. And I well know, if indeed I have learned these things from you, that the tenets of the Academics are not apart from you. Since these, as I said, are fixed in your mind, I do not know why you pursue words.'
8:109
— Non est ista, inquam, mihi crede, uerborum, sed rerum ipsarum magna controuersia; non enim eos illos uiros fuisse arbitror. qui rebus nescirent nomina imponere, sed mihi haec uocabula uidentur elegisse et ad occultandam tardioribus et ad significandam uigilantioribus sententiam suam. quod quare et quomodo mihi uideatur exponam, cum prius illa discussero, quae ab eis tamquam cognitionis humanae inimicis dicta homines putant. itaque perlibenter habeo huc usque hodie nostrum processisse sermonem, ut satis quid inter nos quaereretur aperteque constaret. nam illi mihi uidentur graues omnino ac prudentes uiri fuisse.
我說:「請信我,這並不是關乎字詞的大爭論,而是關乎事情本身的爭論。因為我不認為那些人是那種不懂得如何給事物命名的人;毋寧說,在我看來,他們選用這些詞語,既是為向較遲鈍的人隱藏其本意,又是為向較警醒的人指明其本意。而這在我看來何以如此、如何如此,我將加以闡明——待我先辯明那些被人以為是他們作為人類知識之敵所說的話之後。因此我認為,我們的談話今日進展到此地步,乃是極大的樂事,以致我們之間所探問的究竟是甚麼,已被充分而明白地確立。因為那些人在我看來,全然是嚴肅而審慎的人。」
'This is not,' I said, 'believe me, a great controversy of words, but of the things themselves. For I do not think those men were such as not to know how to impose names on things; rather, these terms seem to me to have been chosen by them both to hide their meaning from the duller and to signify it to the more vigilant. And why and how this seems so to me, I shall expound, when I have first thrashed out those things which men think were said by them as if they were enemies of human knowledge. And so I hold it a very great pleasure that our discourse has thus far advanced today, so that it is sufficiently and openly established what is being inquired between us. For those men seem to me to have been altogether serious and prudent men.'
8:110
si quid est autem, quod nunc disputabimus, aduersus eos erit, qui Academicos inuentioni ueritatis aduersos fuisse crediderunt. et ne me territum putes, etiam contra eos ipsos non inuitus armabor, si non occultandae sententiae suae causa, ne ab eis temere pollutis mentibus et quasi profanis quaedam ueritatis sacra proderentur, sed ex animo illa, quae in eorum libris legimus, defenderunt. quod hodie facerem, nisi nos solis occasus iam domum redire compelleret. — Hactenus illo die disputatum est. Postridie autem, quamuis non minus blandus tranquillusque dies inluxisset, uix tamen domesticis negotiis euoluti sumus.
然而,若今日我們所要論辯的有任何內容,那將是針對那些相信學園派曾與真理的探究相敵對的人。而為了使你不至於以為我心生畏懼,我也並非不情願地武裝自己去對抗這些人本身——倘若他們並非為了隱藏自己的見解(唯恐那些真理的聖物,被輕率地洩漏給他們這等心靈受污、彷彿褻瀆之人),而是發自內心地維護我們在他們書中所讀到的那些學說。這事我今日本要進行,若非日落已迫使我們返家。——那一日的討論到此為止。次日,雖然又是一個同樣溫和寧靜的日子破曉,我們卻好不容易才從家務中脫身。
But if there is anything that we shall now dispute, it will be against those who have believed that the Academics were opposed to the discovery of truth. And that you may not think me alarmed, I shall not unwillingly arm myself even against those very men, if it was not for the sake of concealing their own opinion — lest certain sacred things of truth should be rashly betrayed to them, men of polluted and, as it were, profane minds — but rather that they defended from the heart those doctrines which we read in their books. This I would do today, were not the setting of the sun already compelling us to return home. — Thus far the discussion went on that day. But on the next day, although a day no less mild and calm had dawned, we scarcely disentangled ourselves from domestic affairs.
8:111
nam magnam eius partem in epistolarum maxime scriptione consumseramus et, cum iam duae horae uix reliquae forent, ad pratum processimus. nam inuitabat caeli nimia serenitas placuitque, ut ne ipsum quidem quod restiterat tempus perire pateremur. itaque cum ad arborem solitam uentum esset et mansissemus loco:Uelim uos, inquam, adulescentuli, quoniam non est hodie magna res aggredienda, in memoriam mihi reuocetis, quomodo hesterno die rogatiunculae, quae uos turbauit, Alypius responderit. — Hic Licentius: Tam breue est, inquit, ut nihil negotii sit hoc recordari; quam leue sit autem, tu uideris. nam, ut opinor, uetuit te, res cum constaret, de uerbis mouere quaestionem. — Et ego:
因為我們把當日很大一部分時間,尤其耗費在寫信上,而當僅餘不到兩小時時,我們便走向草地;因為天空過於晴朗而吸引我們,我們也覺得不該讓所剩無幾的時間白白流逝。於是,當我們來到常去的那棵樹旁,並在那地方停留時,我說:年輕人啊,既然今日無甚大事要著手,我希望你們替我喚回記憶,昨日阿利庇烏斯是如何回應那道曾令你們困擾的小問題的。——於是李肯提烏斯說:那實在太簡短了,記起它毫不費力;然而它有多麼輕微,你自會明白。因為據我看來,當事實已然確定時,他禁止你就用詞提出問題。——我便說:
For we had spent a great part of it especially in the writing of letters, and when scarcely two hours were now left, we went out to the meadow; for the exceeding serenity of the sky invited us, and it seemed good that we should not allow even the little time that remained to be lost. And so, when we had come to the usual tree and had settled in the place, I said: I should like you, young men, since today no great matter is to be undertaken, to recall to my memory how Alypius answered yesterday that little question which so disturbed you. — Here Licentius said: It is so brief that there is no trouble in remembering it; but how trifling it is, you shall see. For, as I think, he forbade you, when the fact was agreed, to raise a question about words. — And I said:
8:112
Hoc ipsum, inquam, quid sit quamue habeat uim, satis animaduertistis ? — Uideor, inquit, mihi uidere quid sit; sed quaeso tu id paulisper exponas. nam saepe abs te audiui turpe esse disputantibus in uerborum quaestione inmorari, cum certamen nullum de rebus remanserit. sed hoc subtilius est, quam ut explicandum a me debeat flagitari. Audite ergo, inquam, quid sit, uos. id probabile uel ueri simile Academici uocant, quod nos ad agendum sine adsensione potest inuitare. sine adsensione autem dico, ut id quod agimus non opinemur uerum esse aut non id scire arbitremur, agamus tamen:
你們是否已充分察覺這件事本身——它是什麼,又具有什麼力量?——他說:我似乎看得出它是什麼;但我請你稍微解說一下。因為我常聽你說,當關於事物本身的爭辯已無存留時,論辯者若還在用詞的問題上流連,那是可恥的。但這事太過精微,不該要求由我來解釋。那麼,我說,你們都聽著它是什麼。凡能在不加贊同的情況下促使我們去行動的,學園派便稱之為「或然的」或「近似真理的」。而我說「不加贊同」,意思是:我們所做的事,我們並不認為它為真,也不判定我們知道它,然而我們仍去做它:
Have you sufficiently observed this very thing — what it is and what force it has? — I seem, he said, to see what it is; but I beg you to explain it a little. For I have often heard from you that it is shameful for disputants to linger over a question of words, when no contest about the matters themselves remains. But this is too subtle a thing for its explanation to be demanded of me. Hear then, I said, what it is, you all. That which we can be invited to act upon without assent, the Academics call probable or truth-like. And I say 'without assent' in this sense: that what we do we do not suppose to be true, nor do we judge that we know it, and yet we do it:
8:113
ut uerbi causa, utrum hesterna nocte tam liquida ac pura hodie tam laetus sol exorturus esset, si nos quispiam rogaret. credo, quod nos id scire negaremus, diceremus tamen ita uideri. talia. inquit Academicus, mihi uidentur omnia, quae probabilia uel ueri similia putaui nominanda ; quae tu si alio nomine uis uocare, nihil pugno. satis enim mihi est te iam bene accepisse, quid dicam, id est quibus rebus haec nomina inponam. non enim uocabulorum opificem. sed rerum inquisitorem decet esse sapientem. satisne intellexistis, quomodo mihi ludicra illa, quibus uos agitabam, de manibus excussa sint? — Hic cum ambo sc intellexisse respondissent uultuque ipso responsionem postularent meam:
譬如說,若有人問我們,在昨夜如此清朗純淨之後,今日太陽是否會同樣明亮地升起。我相信我們會否認自己知道此事,卻仍會說看來如此。——那位學園派人說:凡我認為應命名為「或然的」或「近似真理的」,在我看來都是這類事物;你若想用別的名稱來稱呼它們,我毫不爭辯。因為對我而言,你已充分領會我所指的——也就是我把這些名稱加在哪些事物上——這就夠了。因為智者理當是事物的探究者,而非文字的雕琢者。你們是否已充分明白,我用來擾弄你們的那些玩物,是如何從我手中被打落的?——這時,當二人都回答說他們已明白,並以神情本身要求我的回應時:
as, for example, if someone were to ask us whether, after so clear and pure a night as last night's, the sun would today rise as bright. I believe we should deny that we know this, and yet should say that it so appears. — Such things, said the Academic, seem to me all those which I have thought ought to be named probable or truth-like; and if you wish to call them by another name, I do not fight about it. For it is enough for me that you have now well grasped what I mean — that is, upon what things I impose these names. For it befits the wise man to be not a fashioner of words, but an investigator of things. Have you sufficiently understood how those playthings, with which I was harassing you, have been struck from my hands? — Here, when both replied that they had understood, and by their very look demanded my answer:
8:114
Quid putatis, inquam, Ciceronem, cuius haec uerba sunt, inopem fuisse latinae linguae, ut minus apta rebus, quas sentiebat, nomina imponeret? Tum Trygetius: lam, inquit, placet nobis, cum res nota sit, de uerbis nulla.- calumnias commouere. quare uide potius, quid huic respondeas, qui nos liberauit, in quos tu impulsus temtas iterum inruere. — Et Licentius: Mane, ait, quaeso; nam mihi sublucet nescio quid, quod uideam non tibi tam facile tantum argumentum cripi debuisse. et cum defixus 111 cogitatione siluisset aliquantum: Rogo, inquit, nihil esse uidetur absurdius quam dicere se ueri simile sequi eum, qui uerum quid sit ignoret; nec illa me tua similitudo conturbat.
我說:你們認為西塞羅——這些話是他的——在拉丁語文上竟如此貧乏,以致對他所感知的事物加上不甚貼切的名稱嗎?於是特里格提烏斯說:如今,既然此事已明,我們樂意不再就用詞挑起無謂的爭執。因此你且看看,你要如何回應這位釋放了我們的人;你受人慫恿,卻試圖再次向他撲去。——李肯提烏斯說:請等一等;因為有某種微光隱約向我閃現,藉此我看出,如此重大的論證不該如此輕易地從你手中被奪走。當他默然沉思片刻後,他說:我要問——沒有比這更荒謬的了:說一個不知道真理為何物的人卻在追隨近似真理之物;你那個比喻也並不使我困惑。
What do you think, I said — of Cicero, whose words these are — that he was so poor in the Latin tongue as to impose on things names less fitting to what he perceived? Then Trygetius: Now, he said, it pleases us, since the matter is known, to stir up no cavils about words. Therefore consider rather what you may answer to this man who has freed us, upon whom, being driven on, you try once more to rush. — And Licentius: Wait, he said, I beg; for something or other gleams faintly upon me, whereby I see that so great an argument ought not to have been so easily wrested from you. And when he had sat silent for a while, fixed in thought: I ask, he said — nothing seems more absurd than to say that a man follows the truth-like who is ignorant of what the truth is; nor does that comparison of yours disturb me.
8:115
nam recte ego interrogatus, utrum ex ista temperie caeli nulla in crastinum pluuia cogatur, respondeo esse ueri simile. qui me 11011 nego nosse aliquid ueri. nam scio arborem istam modo argenteam fieri non posse multaque talia uere non inpudenter me scire dico, quorum uideo esse similia ea, quae ueri similia nomino. tu uero, Carneades, uel quae alia Graeca pestis, ut nostris parcam — quid enim dubitem in hanc partem transire ad cum, cui captiuus debeor iure uictoriae? — tu ergo, cum te nihil ueri scire dicas, unde hoc ueri simile sequeris? at enim non ei potui aliud nomen inponere. quid ergo nobis disputandum est cum eo, qui nec loqui potest? Nonego. inquit Alypius. perfugas metuam;
因為當我被正當地問及,從天空當前這種溫和的狀態看,明日是否不會凝聚出降雨時,我回答說這是近似真理的;而我並不否認我知道某些真實之事。因為我知道這棵樹此刻不可能變成銀的,我也毫不厚顏地說,我確實知道許多這類事物,我看見我稱為「近似真理的」那些事物與它們相似。但你,卡爾內阿德斯——或無論是哪一種希臘的瘟疫,姑且饒過我們自己人(我又何必猶豫不轉到這一邊,投向那位按勝利之權我理當作其俘虜的人呢?)——那麼你,既然說自己一無真知,你又從何處去追隨這近似真理之物?可是,他確實無法給它加上別的名稱。那麼我們為何非得與一個連話都說不出來的人論辯呢?阿利庇烏斯說:我不會懼怕逃兵;
For when I am rightly asked whether, from this present temperateness of the sky, no rain is being gathered for the morrow, I answer that it is truth-like; and I do not deny that I know something true. For I know that this tree cannot presently be turned to silver, and I say — not impudently — that I truly know many such things, of which I see those to be similar which I call truth-like. But you, Carneades — or whatever other Greek pestilence, to spare our own men (for why should I hesitate to cross over to this side, to him to whom I am owed as captive by right of victory?) — you, then, since you say you know nothing true, whence do you follow this truth-like? But indeed, he could not impose another name on it. Why then must we dispute with one who cannot even speak? I, said Alypius, shall not fear deserters;
← 上一段下一段 →
← 第 7 章第 9 章 →
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。