📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 講道集

拉溫納的金言彼得

講道集 第 1 章

拉丁文原文.10 節.部分字詞可點開查義

第 2 章 →
1:1
Hodie nobis Dominus patrem cum filiis duobus vocavit et produxit in medium: ut immensum suæ * pietatisindicium, saevamJudaicae gentis invidiam, reditum supplicem b populi Christiani,pulchram panderet per figuram. Homo quidam habuit duos filios, et dicit adolescentior ex illis patri: Pater, da mihi portionem substantiæ quæ me contingit. Et divisit, inquit,illis substantiam (Luc, xv). Quantum pius pater, tantum hæres impatiens; qui c patris fatigatur ad vitam; qui patris, quia tempus d adimere non potest, nititur auferre substantiam.
今天主在我們面前呼喚一位父親帶著兩個兒子,領他們到眾人中間,好藉這優美的比喻展開他無量慈憐的憑據、猶太民族兇惡的嫉妒,以及基督徒百姓謙卑懇求的歸回。「一個人有兩個兒子;小兒子對父親說:父親,請把我應得的家業分給我。」經上說,「他就把產業分給他們了。」(路十五)父親何等慈愛,這繼承人卻何等無耐;他厭煩父親仍在世,因不能奪去父親的壽數,就竭力要奪走他的家業。
Today the Lord has summoned before us a father with his two sons and brought them into our midst, that through a beautiful figure he might unfold the immeasurable token of his own compassion, the savage envy of the Jewish nation, and the suppliant return of the Christian people. 'A certain man had two sons, and the younger of them said to his father: Father, give me the portion of the estate that falls to me. And he divided,' it says, 'the estate between them' (Luke 15). As loving as the father is, so impatient is the heir; who is wearied by his father's very life; who, since he cannot take away his father's span of years, strives to carry off his substance.
1:2
Hic ipsam prærogativam filii meruit non habere, qui ea quae patris erant noluit possidere cum patre.Sed quæramus quæ res filium rapuit hos ad ausus, ad petitionem tantam fiducia quæ levarit. Quae res?illa scilicet qua cælestem Patrem sciebat nullo claudendurn fine, concludendum tempore nullo, nulla mortis potestate solvendum. Et ideo cupit videndi libertate gaudere,qui a ditari noluerat facultatibus decedentis.Denique iIlam fuisse hujus petitionis a offensam, genitoris largitas comprobavit. Et divist, inquit, illis substantiam. b Petente uno, ambobus totam substantiam mox divisit; ut scirent filii, c quod ante tenebat pater, non fuisse avaritiæ, sed amoris;
這人既不肯與父親一同持有本屬父親之物,便連兒子的那份殊榮也不配擁有。但我們要問:是甚麼把兒子捲入這樣的膽妄、以何等的自信舉他到這樣大的請求之地步?是甚麼呢?正是他知道那位天上的父親是不受任何終結所限、不受時間所囿、不被死亡的權勢所解的。因此,這不願被垂死之人的財產所富的兒子,卻渴望享受自立生活的自由。總之,父親的慷慨正證明了這請求本身乃是一種冒犯。經上說:「他就把產業分給他們了。」僅一人求討,父親隨即把全部產業分給兩人;好叫兒子們知道,父親先前所持守的,並非出於貪婪,而是出於愛;
This one deserved not even to possess the very prerogative of a son, since he was unwilling to hold, together with his father, the things that were his father's. But let us ask what it was that swept the son into such daring, what confidence lifted him to so great a request. What was it? Namely, that by which he knew the heavenly Father to be confined by no end, bounded by no time, dissolved by no power of death. And therefore he desires to enjoy the freedom of an independent life, he who had been unwilling to be enriched by the resources of one who dies. In short, that this request was itself an offense the father's generosity proved. 'And he divided,' it says, 'the estate between them.' When only one asked, he straightway divided the whole estate between both, that the sons might know that what the father had held before was not of avarice, but of love;
1:3
providentia, non invidentia, non dedisse. Tenebat pater servare substantiam filiis, non negare; et manere ea a pignoribus cupiens, non perire. Beati filii quorum tota est in patris charitate substantia! Beati quibus manet tota in obsequio patris,in patris culturapossessio ! Cæterum e facultates f unitatem scindunt, fraternitatem separant, cognationem spargunt, parentum perduntet violant charitatem, sicut ex sequentibus elucescit: Pater, da mihi portionem substantiæ quæ me contingit. Et divisit, inquit, illis substantiam. Et non post multos hos dies,congregatis omnibus, adolescentior filius peregre profectus est in regionem lon. ginquam,et ibi dissipavit subltantiam suam, vivendo luxuriose.
是出於眷顧,而非出於妒忌,並非不肯給予。父親持守家業,是為了替兒子保存,而非拒絕;是盼望它為兒女存留,而不致敗壞。那些全部家業都在父親慈愛中的兒子有福了!那些全部產業都存於順服父親、事奉父親之中的人有福了!然而錢財分裂合一、拆散手足、離散親族、毀壞並踐踏父母之愛,正如下文所顯明的:「父親,請把我應得的家業分給我。他就把產業分給他們了。過了不多幾日,小兒子就把一切收拾起來,往遠方去了,在那裡任意放蕩,浪費了他的家業。」
that he had given it out of providence, not of envy, and had not refused it. The father held the estate in order to preserve it for his sons, not to deny it; desiring it to remain with his children, not to perish. Blessed are the sons whose whole estate is in their father's love! Blessed are those for whom the whole possession abides in obedience to the father, in the cultivation of the father! But riches split unity, sever brotherhood, scatter kinship, and destroy and violate the love of parents, as shines forth from what follows: 'Father, give me the portion of the estate that falls to me. And he divided the estate between them. And not many days after, gathering all together, the younger son set out abroad into a far country, and there he squandered his estate, living in dissipation.'
1:4
Et posteaquam consumpsisset omnia,facta est fames valida in regioneilla,et ipse cœpit egere,et abiit, et adhæsit uni civium regionis illus, et misit iltum in villam suam, ut pasceret porcos. Et cupiebat implere ventrem suum de siliquis quas porci manducabant, et nemo illi dabat. Ecce quid facit g cupiditas ad censum præceps. Ecce quemadmodum sine patre census nudavit filium, non ditavit; census filium tulit e gremio patris, ejecit de domo, exemit patria, spoliavit fama, exuit castitate. Quod vitae, quod morum, quod pietatis,quod libertatis, quod est gloriæ, nil reliquit.
「既耗盡了一切,那地方又遇著大饑荒,他就窮困起來;於是去投靠那地方的一個居民,那人打發他到田裡去放豬。他恨不得拿豬所吃的豆莢充飢,也沒有人給他。」看哪,那急切逐財的貪慾成就了甚麼。看哪,離了父親,財富如何使兒子赤貧、而非致富;財富把兒子從父親的懷中奪去,逐出家門,攆離故土,剝奪名譽,褪去貞潔。凡屬生命、德行、虔敬、自由、榮耀之物,一無所留。
'And after he had consumed everything, a mighty famine arose in that region, and he himself began to be in want; and he went and attached himself to one of the citizens of that region, and he sent him into his farm to feed swine. And he longed to fill his belly with the husks that the swine were eating, and no one gave to him.' Behold what greed, plunging headlong after wealth, brings about. Behold how wealth, apart from the father, stripped the son bare rather than enriching him; wealth took the son from his father's bosom, cast him out of the house, removed him from his homeland, despoiled him of his good name, stripped him of his chastity. Of life, of morals, of piety, of freedom, of glory — it left nothing.
1:5
Civem denique in peregrinum,filium in mercenarium, in egenum locupletem,liberum mutavit in servum, junxit porcis a patre piissimo quem sejunxit, ut serviret h cœnoso pecori, qui pietati sanctæ parere contempsit.Congregatis, inquit, omnibus, adolescentior. Adolescentior iste plane i non aetate, sed sensu; qui congregavit bona patris, j et abiit longe plus mente quam loco; ut dato, non accepto pretio misere se venderet servituti. Sic mercator ad talem contractum pervenit, qui parentum debitum nescit solvere, qui vicem k nescit redhibere generanti.
總之,財富把公民變作異鄉客,把兒子變作雇工,把富人變作窮人,把自由人變作奴僕;它把那被至慈之父分別出來的兒子與豬同列,使那不屑順服神聖孝愛的人去服事污穢的畜群。經上說:「收拾了一切,那小兒子。」這人分明不是年紀上的「小」,而是心智上的小;他收攏了父親的財物,去到遠方——與其說是地方上的遠離,不如說是心思上的遠離;以致他付出而非收取代價,可憐地把自己賣作奴隸。這樣的商人才會做成這種交易:他不懂償還欠父母的債,不懂回報生他的人。
In short, it changed a citizen into a stranger, a son into a hireling, a rich man into a pauper, a free man into a slave; it joined to swine the one whom it had severed from his most loving father, so that he who scorned to obey holy devotion might serve a filthy herd. 'Gathering all together,' it says, 'the younger.' This one is 'younger' plainly not in age but in sense; who gathered up his father's goods and departed far more in mind than in place, so that, by paying rather than receiving a price, he wretchedly sold himself into servitude. Thus does that merchant come to such a bargain, who knows not how to pay the debt owed to his parents, who knows not how to render the recompense to the one who begot him.
1:6
Est penes patrem dulcis conditio,libera servitus,absoluta custodia, timor lætus, blanda ultio, paupertas dives,secura possessio.Namque ad patrem labor respicit, fructus redundatin filios. Dissipavit, inquit, substantiam suam. Quae composita fuerant patre moderante, prodigente filio dissipantur; ut vel tarde sapiat patrem custodem, 1 non incubatorem fuisse substantiæ. Vivendo luxuriose. Mortalis est istavita; quia moriturvirtutibus: qui vitiis vivit, sepelitur famæ, perit gloriæ:qui manetturpitudini,crescit infamiæ. Et postecaquam consumpsisset omnia, facta estfames valida in regione illa. Luxuriæ, ventri, gulæ, fames tortor apponitur: ut ibi ultrix poena saeviat, ubi pœnalis reatusexarserat.
在父親那裡有甘美的境況、自由的服事、無拘的看顧、歡愉的敬畏、溫柔的責罰、富足的清貧、穩妥的產業。因為勞苦歸於父親,果實卻滿溢歸於兒子。經上說:「他浪費了自己的家業。」凡在父親料理下積聚的,都被揮霍的兒子耗盡了;好叫他至終縱使遲了,也能醒悟:父親原是家業的看守者,而非只知貪婪囤積者。「任意放蕩地生活。」這種生活是必死的,因為它向諸德而死:活在惡習中的人,就向名譽被埋葬、向榮耀而喪亡;持守醜行的人,只在惡名中增長。「既耗盡了一切,那地方就遇著大饑荒。」為那奢華、肚腹、貪食,饑荒這刑吏就被派來:好叫報應的刑罰在該處肆虐——就在那應受刑罰的罪咎曾經燃燒之處。
With the father there is a sweet condition, a free servitude, an unfettered guardianship, a joyful fear, a caressing chastisement, a rich poverty, a secure possession. For the labor falls back upon the father, while the fruit overflows to the sons. 'He squandered,' it says, 'his estate.' What had been amassed under the father's management is squandered by the prodigal son, that at least belatedly he might understand that the father was the guardian of the estate, not one who brooded greedily over it. 'Living in dissipation.' This life is a dying one, for it dies to the virtues: he who lives in vices is buried to good repute, perishes to glory; he who abides in shamefulness grows in infamy. 'And after he had consumed all, a mighty famine arose in that region.' To luxury, to the belly, to gluttony, famine the tormentor is set, that the avenging punishment may rage in the very place where the guilt deserving punishment had blazed up.
1:7
Facta est fames valida. Ad talem finem semper voracitas tendit, ad talem pervenit terminum fugienda voluptatis effusio. Et ipse cœpit egere. Filium data facit egere substantia,quæ divitem negatamservasset: ut penes se difficeret habendo,qui penes patrem abundaverat non habendo. Et adhœsit uni civium regionis illius, et misit illum in villam suam, utpasceret porcos.
「那地方遇著大饑荒。」貪食總是趨向這樣的結局,那當躲避的縱慾之放蕩總是走到這樣的終點。「他就窮困起來。」所分得的家業使兒子窮困,這家業若被拒絕本可保他富足:好叫這在父親那裡因不擁有而豐足的人,如今因擁有反陷入困窘。「他就去投靠那地方的一個居民,那人打發他到田裡去放豬。」
'A mighty famine arose.' To such an end voracity always tends; to such a terminus comes the outpouring of pleasure, which ought to be shunned. 'And he himself began to be in want.' The estate given makes the son to be in want, which, had it been refused, would have kept him rich: so that he might fall into difficulty by his having, who with his father had abounded by his not having. 'And he attached himself to one of the citizens of that region, and he sent him into his farm to feed swine.'
1:8
Sic invenit qui se negat patri,qui se committitextraneo:utsentiatn severum judicem, qui fugit indulgentissimum provisorem.Affectionis desertor,pietatis refuga, deputatur porcis,porcis addicitur, porcorum traditur servituti,o porcorum pascua p lutulenta percurrit,inquieti gregis teritur,et maculatur excursu,ut sentiat quam miserum sit amarum quam sit, quietis paternæ beatitudinem perdidisse.Et cupiebat implere ventrem suum desiliquis quas porci manducabant, et nemo illi dabat. Quam crudele ministerium, quia q nequeconvivit porcis, qui vivit porcis ! Miser, rqui squallentis pecoris deficit et esurit in saginam ! Miser,qui a squalentis cibi cupit, nec b impetrat qualitatem !
凡不肯屬父親、卻把自己交託給外人的,就會有這樣的遭遇:他躲避那至寬容的供養者,就要嚐到嚴厲的審判者。這背棄慈愛、逃避孝敬的人,被派去看豬、被判與豬為伍、被交去服事豬群,奔走於豬那泥濘的牧場,被那躁動的畜群折磨,因來回奔波而沾滿污穢,好叫他嚐到:失去父家安息的福樂是何等悲慘、何等苦澀。「他恨不得拿豬所吃的豆莢充飢,也沒有人給他。」這是何等殘酷的差役——他為豬而活,卻連與豬同食也不得!可憐哪,他在污穢畜群的飼料前竟枯乏挨餓!可憐哪,他渴望那污穢之食的份量,竟也求之不得!
Thus does he find his lot who denies himself to his father and entrusts himself to a stranger: that he should feel a stern judge, who fled from a most indulgent provider. A deserter of affection, a fugitive from piety, he is assigned to swine, consigned to swine, handed over to the servitude of swine; he runs through the muddy pastures of swine, is worn down by the restless herd, and is defiled by his wandering, that he may feel how wretched, how bitter it is to have lost the blessedness of the father's rest. 'And he longed to fill his belly with the husks that the swine were eating, and no one gave to him.' How cruel a servitude — he who does not even feast with the swine, though he lives for the swine! Wretched, who faints and hungers amid the fattening fodder of the squalid herd! Wretched, who craves even the quality of squalid food, and does not obtain it!
1:9
His edooti, instruoti talibus,maneamus in domopatris,c matris in gremio perduremus, cognatorum constringamur amplexibus, viscera nos paterna constringant, ne nos ad supradicta mala pertrahat adolescentiæ miseranda libertas. Sepiat nos paternareverentia, matris componat affectio, cognatorum custodiamur affectibus. Inter propinquorum d lumina non valent delicta versari.Propiuquorum quot oculi,tot lucernæ. Dies est aspectus matris: sol,patris rutilat in vultu.Undc viventi inter tot e vertutum luces, criminum tenebræ propinquare non possunt.Sed mensa patris nos alit virtutis cibo,salutis epulo, deliciis honestatis et gloriæ. Et quia latius nos de hac parabola digere cogit prolixa.
我們既受了這些教訓、得了這樣的鑑戒,就當住在父親的家中,長存於母親的懷抱,被親族的擁抱緊緊束住,讓父親的慈腸懷抱我們,免得青春那可悲的放縱把我們拖入上述的諸惡。願父親的威嚴護衛我們,願母親的慈愛安定我們,願我們被親族的情愛所看守。在至親眾人的目光之間,罪過無從得逞。親人有多少眼睛,就有多少明燈。母親的注視便是白晝,父親的容顏閃耀如紅日。因此,人活在如此眾多的德行之光中,罪惡的黑暗就無法臨近。而父親的筵席以德行之糧、救恩之宴、尊榮與榮耀的美饌餵養我們。因這段冗長的經課逼使我們更廣泛地闡述這比喻——
Taught by these things, instructed by such examples, let us remain in the father's house, let us abide in the mother's bosom, let us be bound fast by the embraces of our kin, let the father's inmost heart enfold us, lest the pitiable freedom of youth drag us to the evils named above. Let the father's reverence hedge us round, let the mother's affection compose us, let us be guarded by the affections of our kin. Amid the lights of near kinsfolk sins have no power to move about. As many eyes as there are of kinsmen, so many lamps. The mother's gaze is day; the sun glows ruddy in the father's face. Whence, for one who lives amid so many lights of the virtues, the darkness of crimes cannot draw near. But the father's table nourishes us with the food of virtue, the banquet of salvation, the delights of honor and glory. And because the lengthy course of the reading compels us to expound this parable more fully —
1:10
series lectionis, quis si pater in donando faoiljs, facilior in recipiendo; quis sit frater fratris tristissimus in salute; quis sit adolescentior abscessu incipiens, sapientissimus in regressu, sequenti sermone f votis communibus inquiremus.
那賜與時慷慨、收回時更慷慨的父親是誰;那對兄弟得救反倒滿懷憂愁的哥哥是誰;那起初以離去為始、卻在歸回中最為明智的小兒子是誰——這些我們要在下一篇講道中,藉眾人共同的祈願一同探究。
who the father is, easy in giving and easier in receiving back; who is the brother that is most sorrowful at his brother's salvation; who is the younger son, beginning in his departure yet most wise in his return — these things, in the following sermon and with our common prayers, we shall inquire into.
第 2 章 →
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157