📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 講道集

拉溫納的金言彼得

講道集 第 157 章 第 2/4 段

拉丁文原文.36 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 157:39–157:74(全章共 133 節)

← 第 156 章
← 上一段下一段 →
157:39
quæ oblivio spei est,infirmum et minorem et contemptibilem aestimare Christum, qui nobis fortitudinem et magnitudinem et gloriam secundum Patris sui contulit voluntatem ? Crede mihi; Filii honordignitatis Patris est; quantum detuleris unigenito,tanto magis amplificabis gloriam Patris. Bonus Pater non invidet gloriam Filio; quia omnis gloria Filii recurrit in Patrem. Hic est catholicus sensus, haec devotiofidelium, hoc studium sanctorum.Secundum haec,omniadicta et facta Salvatoris intelligunt, et intelligentes loquuntur. Nec omnino impediuntur ad hanc devotionem per illa quæ Domini voluntatem videntur ostendere: ut puta, Pater major me est (Joan. XIV, 28);
把基督看為軟弱、次等、可鄙的,這是何等把盼望忘卻呢?祂卻按祂父的旨意將剛強、偉大與榮耀賜給我們。請信我:子的尊榮就是父的尊貴;你將多少歸與那獨生子,就必將父的榮耀擴大多少。良善的父不嫉妒子的榮耀;因為子一切的榮耀都歸回於父。這就是大公的意義,這就是信徒的敬虔,這就是眾聖徒的熱忱。他們照這些來領會救主一切的言語與作為,既領會了,便如此述說。他們在這敬虔上,也絲毫不因那些似乎顯明主之意願的話而受攔阻:例如,父是比我大的(約十四28);
What forgetfulness of hope is it, to esteem Christ weak and lesser and contemptible, who conferred upon us fortitude and greatness and glory according to the will of His Father? Believe me: the honour of the Son is the dignity of the Father; as much as you offer to the only-begotten, so much the more will you amplify the glory of the Father. The good Father does not envy the Son His glory; for all the glory of the Son runs back to the Father. This is the Catholic sense, this the devotion of the faithful, this the zeal of the saints. According to these things they understand all the sayings and deeds of the Saviour, and understanding, they speak of them. Nor are they at all hindered in this devotion by those things which seem to show the Lord's will: as, for instance, The Father is greater than I (Joan. XIV, 28);
157:40
et, Non veni facere voluntatem meam (Joan. VI, 38); et, Filius a se nihil potest facere (Joan. v, 19); et alia multa hujuscemodi: quæ omnia non infirmant Filium,neque depretiant, sed ad Patre b distinguunt.Siquidem et haec ideo sunt posita, ut vera ejus divinitas non negetur: Ego de Deo Patre exivi (Joan. XVI, 28); et, Ego in Patre, et Pater in me (Joan. x, 38); Ego et Pater unum sumus (Ibid.,30); et, Qui me videt,c vidit et Patrem (Joan.XIV, 9); et Sicut Pater suscitat mortuos et vivificat, ita et Filius quos vult vivificat (Joan. v, 21). 6. Sed nec illa fidelem animam scandalizant, quibus Dominus esurisse, dormisse, lacrymasserefertur; tunc, tristis usque ad mortem,crux,passio,sepultura:
又如,我來不是要按自己的意思行(約六38);又如,子憑著自己不能作什麼(約五19);以及許多這類的話:這一切都不使子軟弱,也不貶低祂,只是將祂與父分別出來。因為這些話所以記下,正為叫祂真實的神性不被否認:我從父神出來(約十六28);我在父裡面,父在我裡面(約十38);我與父原為一(同上30);人看見了我,就是看見了父(約十四9);父怎樣叫死人起來,使他們活著,子也照樣隨自己的意思使人活著(約五21)。那些記載主曾飢餓、睡覺、哭泣,以及祂憂傷幾乎要死、十字架、受難、埋葬之事,也不使信徒的心靈跌倒:
and, I came not to do my own will (Joan. VI, 38); and, The Son can do nothing of Himself (Joan. V, 19); and many other things of this kind: all of which do not weaken the Son, nor depreciate Him, but distinguish Him from the Father. Since these too are set down for this end, that His true divinity may not be denied: I came forth from God the Father (Joan. XVI, 28); and, I am in the Father, and the Father in me (Joan. X, 38); I and the Father are one (Ibid., 30); and, He that sees me, sees also the Father (Joan. XIV, 9); and, As the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom He will (Joan. V, 21). But neither do those things scandalize the faithful soul, in which the Lord is reported to have hungered, slept, wept; and then, sorrowful even unto death, the cross, the Passion, the burial:
157:41
siquidem ad hoc sunt scripta et facta,ut et tolerantiæ exempla præberentur, et veraejus incarnatio nosceretur. Nam in eo quod esurisse Dominus dicitur, veri corporis assumptionem intellige. In eo autem cum quinque panibus et piscibus duobus, quinque d millia hominum satiat, veram ej us divinitatem cognosce.Certe cum dicit: Ego sum panis vivus qui de cælo descendi (Joan. vi, 4i), non cadit in sensum nostrum ut panis esurire credatur. Sic et de somno intelligendum est quoniam sicut per e somnum corporis veritas cognoscitur, sic per illud quod statim venUs et fluctibus imperat, veraejus divinitas approbatur.Nam quod lacrymassuper Lazarum fudit, fantasmatis suspicio tollitur;
因為這些事之所以被記下並成就,乃為叫忍耐的榜樣得以提供,並祂真實的道成肉身得以被知曉。因為主既說曾飢餓,就當領會那真實身體的取用。而祂用五餅二魚使五千人吃飽,就當認出祂真實的神性。誠然,當祂說:我是從天上降下來生命的糧(約六41),我們的悟性斷不能認為「糧」會飢餓。睡覺之事也當如此領會,因為既藉身體的睡覺顯出真實,就藉祂隨即吩咐風浪之事證明祂真實的神性。至於祂為拉撒路流淚,便除去了「幻影」的疑惑;
since for this end they were written and done, that both examples of endurance might be furnished, and His true incarnation might be known. For in that the Lord is said to have hungered, understand the assumption of a true body. But in that with five loaves and two fishes He feeds five thousand men, recognize His true divinity. Assuredly, when He says: I am the living bread that came down from heaven (Joan. VI, 41), it does not fall within our sense that bread should be believed to hunger. So too is it to be understood of sleep, since as by the sleep of the body the truth is known, so by that which immediately commands the winds and the waves, His true divinity is proved. For in that He shed tears over Lazarus, the suspicion of a phantasm is removed;
157:42
lacrymae enim veri corporis sunt humores. Quod autemdicit, Lazare, veni foras (Joan. xi, 43), et statim ille qui jam fetebat, aperiente se terra, vivus emersit,magnumejus divinitatis indicium est. Nam Et illud quod ait, Tristis est anima mea usque ad mortem (Matth. XXVI, 38), ex hac ipsa Lazari resurrectione intelligi potest, qualiter debeat accipi: nec enim divinitas mortem metuebat, sed d humanum affectum per tristitiam animi indicabat. Crux æque, passio et sepultura, g uno vel altero dicto Domini, discutiuntur, quominus ei impotentia vel infirmitas ascribatur. Cum dicit ad Judreos, Solvite templum hoc, utique corpussuum di. cebat: et ego In triduo suscitabo illud (Joan. II, 19).
因為眼淚乃是真實身體的津液。而祂說:拉撒路出來(約十一43),那已經發臭的人立時在地裂開之際活著出來,這乃是祂神性的大憑據。因為祂所說:我心裡甚是憂傷,幾乎要死(太二十六38),也可從拉撒路這復活之事領會當如何理解:因為神性並不懼怕死亡,只是藉心靈的憂傷顯出人性的情感。十字架、受難、埋葬同樣被主一兩句話所化解,免得軟弱無能被歸於祂。當祂對猶太人說:你們拆毀這殿,祂分明是指自己的身體:我三日內要再建立起來(約二19)。
for tears are the humours of a true body. But in that He says, Lazarus, come forth (Joan. XI, 43), and immediately he who already stank, the earth opening itself, came forth alive, it is a great token of His divinity. For that also which He says, My soul is sorrowful even unto death (Matth. XXVI, 38), can from this very resurrection of Lazarus be understood, how it ought to be taken: for the divinity did not fear death, but through the sorrow of the soul indicated a human affection. The cross likewise, the Passion, and the burial, are dispelled by one or another saying of the Lord, lest impotence or infirmity be ascribed to Him. When He says to the Jews, Destroy this temple, He surely meant His own body: and I will raise it up in three days (Joan. II, 19).
157:43
Et iterum ait,Potestatem habeo ponere animam meam, et potestatem habeo iterum sumere illam (Joan. x, 18). h Si corporis sui suscitat templum, si potestas est ponendæ animæ per passionem et resumendæ per resurrectionem, cessat in Christo infirmitatis opinio, ubi tantae potestatis sublimitas declaratur. 7. Omnia ergo pie intelligenda sunt; omnia bono. rifice sunt tractanda; utrumque in Domino i confitendum est; et forma in qua semper fuit, et forma servi, quae accepta est propter servos, credenda est; et passio secundum carnem,et impossibilitas secundum divinitatem; ne aut impiij aut ingrati judicemur.Nam qui Filium Dei,secundumid quod est,im.
祂又說:我有權柄捨了生命,也有權柄取回來(約十18)。祂若能建立起自己身體的殿,若有權柄藉受難捨去生命、藉復活取回生命,那麼,在這彰顯如此大權能之崇高的基督裡,「軟弱」之見便止息了。因此,一切都當敬虔地領會;一切都當以尊崇待之;在主裡兩者都當信認:祂素常所有的形像,以及那為眾奴僕之故所取的奴僕的形像,都當相信;並要信按肉體的受苦,與按神性的不受苦;免得我們被判為不敬虔或忘恩。因為人若否認神的子按祂本體是不受苦的,
And again He says, I have power to lay down my life, and I have power to take it up again (Joan. X, 18). If He raises up the temple of His own body, if there is power of laying down the soul through the Passion and of resuming it through the Resurrection, the opinion of infirmity ceases in Christ, where the sublimity of so great power is declared. All things therefore are to be piously understood; all are to be handled with honour; both are to be confessed in the Lord; and the form in which He always was, and the form of a servant, which was assumed for the sake of servants, is to be believed; and the passion according to the flesh, and the impassibility according to the divinity; lest we be judged either impious or ungrateful. For he who denies the Son of God, according to that which He is, to be impassible,
157:44
passibilem negat,et Deo Patri dicit esse dissimilem; hicimpius est. Et qui passiones ejus secundumcarnem confiteri dedignatur, ingratus est. Gloriemur ergo in cruce Christi,sicut Paulus gloriari consuevit: Mihi, inquit, absit gloriari nisi in cruce Domini nostri Jesu Christi (Gal. VI, 14). Confiteamur unitatem.ut non separemur: It Si enim mortui sumus,ut ait Apostolus, et convivemus: si sustinemus, et conregnabimus. Si negamus, et ille negabit nos (II Tim. II, 12). Si non credimusquod ipse dicit, Ego et Pater unum sumus, ille fidelis permanet, negare se ipsum non potest; quia in gloria Dei Patris est; quia vivit cum Patre; quia regnat cum Patre uno eodemque imperio.
又說祂與父神不相似,這人便是不敬虔的。而人若不屑承認祂按肉體的苦難,便是忘恩的。因此,讓我們以基督的十字架誇口,正如保羅素常誇口的:但我斷不以別的誇口,只誇我們主耶穌基督的十字架(加六14)。讓我們信認那合一,免得我們被隔絕:使徒說,我們若與祂同死,也必與祂同活;我們若能忍耐,也必與祂一同作王;我們若不認祂,祂也必不認我們(提後二11-12)。我們若不信祂自己所說「我與父原為一」,祂仍是可信的,祂不能背乎自己;因為祂在父神的榮耀裡;因為祂與父同活;因為祂與父以同一權柄一同作王。
and says that He is unlike God the Father, this man is impious. And he who disdains to confess His sufferings according to the flesh, is ungrateful. Let us therefore glory in the cross of Christ, as Paul was wont to glory: But God forbid, he says, that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ (Gal. VI, 14). Let us confess the unity, that we be not separated: For if we are dead with Him, says the Apostle, we shall also live with Him: if we endure, we shall also reign with Him. If we deny Him, He also will deny us (II Tim. II, 11-12). If we believe not what He Himself says, I and the Father are one, He remains faithful, He cannot deny Himself; because He is in the glory of God the Father; because He lives with the Father; because He reigns with the Father in one and the same dominion.
157:45
Sicut ait Apostolus, cum de omni impudicoet immundoet avaro loqueretur, Non erit, inquit, hæres in regno Christi et Dei (Eph. v, 5); unum regnum tam Christi dixit quam Dei; quia una voluntas Patris et Filii; una cooperatio; una denique gratia, eademque gubernatio est: sicut idem magisler gentium docet scribens: Gratia vobis et pax a Deo Patre et Domino nostro Jesu Christo. Et iterum: Ipse autem Deus et Pater noster et Dominus Jesus dirigat viam nostram ad vos (I Thess. III, 11). Non dixit dirigant. ne Patris et Filii diversitatem aut voluntatis,aut potestatis induceret; sed dixit dirigat, ut unitatempotius demonstraret.
正如使徒論到一切淫亂、污穢、貪心之人時所說:在基督和神的國裡,都是無分的(弗五5);他稱之為一國,既是基督的,也是神的;因為父與子有同一意願、同一協作,同一恩典,末了也有同一治理:正如這外邦人的教師教導人時所寫的:願恩惠平安從父神和我們的主耶穌基督歸與你們。又說:願神我們的父和我們的主耶穌,一直引領我們到你們那裡去(帖前三11)。他不說「引領」(複數),免得引入父與子在意願或權能上的差異;卻說「引領」(單數),為要顯明那合一。
As the Apostle says, when he was speaking of every unchaste and unclean and covetous person, There shall be, he says, no heir in the kingdom of Christ and of God (Eph. V, 5); he called it one kingdom, as much of Christ as of God; because there is one will of the Father and the Son; one co-operation; one grace, finally, and one and the same governance: as the same teacher of the Gentiles instructs, writing: Grace to you and peace from God the Father and our Lord Jesus Christ. And again: But may God Himself and our Father, and the Lord Jesus, direct our way unto you (I Thess. III, 11). He did not say 'direct' (plural), lest he should introduce a diversity of the Father and the Son, either of will or of power; but he said 'direct' (singular), that he might rather demonstrate the unity.
157:46
Hac igitur fide hisdem verbis et nos oremus ut Patris, Filii et Spiritus sancti una gratia, una pax. una etiam gubernatio semper nos et tueatur et dirigat. Haec pauca ad vicem commentarioli,'quia vobis scribi postulastis. negare non potui. Confido qaia fidelibus animis, etsi brevia sunt, plenam poterunt præstare laetitiam Dei. Explicit liber Nicetæ i episcopi de Ratione fide! Incipit ejusdem de sancti Spiritus Potentia. i. Sequitur, ut quid de tertia persona, id est Spiritus sancti,sentiam,pro captu mentis exponam: siquidem de hoc vel maxime b dubitare multos intelligo.
因此,讓我們也以這信德、用這同樣的話禱告:願父、子、聖靈同一的恩典、同一的平安、同一的治理,永遠保護並引領我們。既然你們求把這些話寫給你們,我便無法拒絕這幾句聊當小注的話。我深信這些話對忠信的心靈,雖然簡短,卻能賜下神完全的喜樂。尼西塔主教《論信仰的準則》一書至此完結。他的《論聖靈的權能》一書於此開始。接下來,我要照我心智的度量,陳明我對第三位、就是聖靈所持的看法:因為我明白許多人尤其在這事上存疑。
With this faith, therefore, and in these same words, let us also pray that the one grace of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the one peace, one governance also, may ever both protect and direct us. These few words in place of a little commentary, since you asked that they be written to you, I could not refuse. I am confident that to faithful souls, though they are brief, they will be able to afford the full gladness of God. Here ends the book of Nicetas the bishop On the Rule of Faith. Here begins his book On the Power of the Holy Spirit. It follows that I set forth, according to the capacity of my mind, what I hold concerning the third Person, that is, the Holy Spirit: since I understand that many doubt especially about this.
157:47
Et licet temerarium sit de hoc disputare qui Patri et Filio in confessione sociatur,secundum Dominitraditionemet nostram in baptismo confessionem, tamen quia muJti diversa sentiunt, et ratio a nobis inquiritur, necessarioreddendaest; nec aliunde reddenda, nisi ex divinarum fontibus Scripturarum. Certus autem sum; præoccupatas aures et sensus alia opinione gravatos, difficile posse placari: perniciosa est enim praeventio. Nam hoc in natura humana est, ut si de aliquo viro bono male nobis fuerit susurratum, et praevenerit cognitionem veri nuntius mendax, difficile et laboriose susceptam deponamusopinionem,etiamsi idoneisassertoribusdoceamur.
雖然按主的傳統與我們在洗禮中的信認,聖靈是在信認中與父、子相聯合的,論斷祂本是冒失之舉,然而因為許多人持不同的看法,又有人向我們追討理由,這理由就必須交出;且不可從別處交出,唯獨從神聖經的泉源。但我確知:那被先入之見佔據的耳朵、被別種意見所壓的心思,很難被說服:因為成見是有害的。因為人性中有這樣的情形:若有人向我們低聲說某位好人的壞話,且有虛謊的信差搶先於對真相的認識,我們便難以、且費力地放下那已接受的看法,縱使有合宜的見證人教導我們也是如此。
And although it is rash to dispute about Him who is joined to the Father and the Son in confession, according to the Lord's tradition and our confession in baptism, yet because many hold divergent views, and a reason is required of us, it must of necessity be rendered; nor rendered from anywhere else, save from the fountains of the divine Scriptures. But I am certain that ears pre-occupied and minds weighed down by another opinion can with difficulty be appeased: for a prejudice is pernicious. For this is in human nature, that if something evil has been whispered to us about some good man, and a lying messenger has forestalled the knowledge of the truth, we lay aside with difficulty and toil the opinion once received, even if we are taught by suitable witnesses.
157:48
Quod nunc multis suspicor eventurum,qui prava doctorum interpretatione anticipati,Spiritum sanctum creaturam crediderunt, et tamquam ministrum despexerunt. Ad propositum igitur redeamus. 2. In Niceenotractatupositum est secundum symboli formam, Credimus et Spiritum sanctum. Quod utique sufficiebat fidelibus, quia in illo conventu de Filio quaestio fuerat, non de Spiritu sancto. Atque utinam ut fuerat traditum,cum Patre et Filio Spiritum sanctum simpliciter credidissentilli qui postmodum quaestionem de Spiritu induxerunt ! ut puta, Macedoniani vel eorum in hac curiositate participes. Dum enim quaerunt et isti, qualis et Spiritussanctus? unde est? quantus est? natus est? an factus est ?
我疑心這事如今要臨到許多人身上,他們被教師悖謬的解釋所誤導在先,就信聖靈是受造之物,並輕視祂如同一位僕役。因此,讓我們回到本題。在尼西亞的論述中,按信經的樣式定下:我們也信聖靈。這對忠信之人本已足夠,因為在那次會議中,所爭辯的是關乎子,而非關乎聖靈。但願那些後來引入關乎聖靈之問題的人,能照所傳遞的,單純地將聖靈與父、子一同相信才好!比方馬其頓派,或那些同懷此好奇之人。因為當這些人也詰問:聖靈又是何等的?祂從何而來?祂有多大?祂是生的嗎?還是造的嗎?
Which I suspect will now happen to many, who, forestalled by the perverse interpretation of teachers, have believed the Holy Spirit to be a creature, and have despised Him as a minister. Let us return therefore to our purpose. In the Nicene treatise it was set down, according to the form of the creed, We believe also in the Holy Spirit. Which surely sufficed for the faithful, because in that assembly there had been a question about the Son, not about the Holy Spirit. And would that, as it had been handed down, they who afterwards introduced the question about the Spirit had simply believed the Holy Spirit together with the Father and the Son! as, for instance, the Macedonians, or those who share in this curiosity. For while these too inquire, of what sort is the Holy Spirit also? Whence is He? How great is He? Was He born? Or was He made?
157:49
sic iterum sciderunt populnm, et vere, secundum Apostoli dictum (I Tim. i, 4), interminabilem quæstionem Ecclesiis induxerunt. Nonne oportuerat quem semel sanctum etc natum sanctum crediderant: eum cum Patre magis et Filio honorificarent, quam creaturis sociarent?Sed adhuc inducunt quæstiones, et tortuosis interrogationibus simplices quosque fide spoliare contendunt. Nulli autem dibium puto esse, quia mala interrogatio eum qui interrogatur, nisi cautus fuerit, nescium praecipitat in blasphemiam. Et inde est quod praemonet Paulus: Videte nequisvos spoliet per philosophiam et inanem deceptionem (Coloss. II, 8). Interrogant enim rebelles Spiritus sancti: natus est Spiritus sanctus, an innatus?
如此,他們又撕裂了信眾,並且真如使徒所說(提前一4),把無窮的辯論引入眾教會。他們既曾信聖靈為聖、且生來為聖,豈不當將祂與父、子一同尊崇,而非將祂與受造之物同列?然而他們仍舊引入問題,並以曲折的詰問竭力剝奪任何單純之人的信德。我想無人會懷疑:惡意的詰問若那被問之人不謹慎,便會將他在不知不覺中推入褻瀆。因此保羅預先警告:你們要謹慎,恐怕有人用他的哲學和虛空的妄言把你們擄去(西二8)。因為那些悖逆之人詰問論到聖靈:聖靈是生的,還是非生的?
thus again they rent the people, and truly, according to the Apostle's saying (I Tim. I, 4), introduced an interminable question into the Churches. Ought they not rather to have honoured, together with the Father and the Son, Him whom they had once believed to be holy and holy by birth, than to have associated Him with creatures? But still they bring in questions, and by tortuous interrogations they contend to strip of faith any who are simple. And I think it doubtful to no one that an evil interrogation hurls the one questioned, unless he be wary, unknowingly into blasphemy. And hence it is that Paul forewarns: See that no man rob you through philosophy and vain deceit (Coloss. II, 8). For the rebels question concerning the Holy Spirit: Was the Holy Spirit born, or unborn?
157:50
Ecce laquei duo dextra laevaque protensi: in quam enim partem volueris pedem responsionis extendere, capieris. Si dixeris, natus est; dicet et jam non esse unigenitum Filium Dei, eo quod sit et alter natus. Si diaeris non est natus; dicet tibi, ergo et aller erit Pater ingenitus: et jam non est unus Deus Pater, ex quo omnia. Potsquam vero utrimque viam responsionis obstruxerit, jam te quasi recto cursu deducit in foveam ut dicat: Si ergo neque natus est de Patre Spiritus,neque ingenitus,superest ut creatura dicatur. 3. Quid faciet inter has clausulas fides Ecclesiae ?
看哪,兩個網羅左右張開:因為無論你想把回答之足伸向哪一邊,你都要被捉住。你若說「祂是生的」,他就說祂便不再是神的獨生子,因為另有一位也是生的。你若說「祂不是生的」,他就對你說,那麼另有一位非受生的父:如今便不再有一位萬物所本的父神了。及至他把兩邊回答的路都堵住,就彷彿順著直道把你引入坑中,好說:那麼,聖靈若既非從父所生、又非非受生的,就只剩下說祂是受造之物了。教會的信德在這些難題之間該當如何?
Behold two snares stretched out on the right and on the left: for into whichever part you wish to extend the foot of your reply, you will be caught. If you say, He was born, he will say that He is then no longer the only-begotten Son of God, since another also has been born. If you say, He was not born, he will say to you, then there will also be another unbegotten Father: and now there is no longer one God the Father, of whom are all things. But when he has blocked the way of reply on either side, he now leads you as if by a straight course into the pit, so as to say: If then the Spirit was neither born of the Father, nor unbegotten, it remains that He be called a creature. What shall the faith of the Church do amid these clauses?
157:51
acquiescattortuosae philosophiæ, et contra omnium opinionem scripturarum tam veteris quam novi Testamenti d credat esse creatum Spiritum Dei sanctum, quem nusquam creaturam legere potuit? Absit. Melius plane faciet, si spretis hujus modi humanis conclusionibus et vinculis interrogationum, ad Domini sui se verba convertat. Ipse enim in Evangelio dicit unde sit Spiritus sanctus,ipse finem statuit quaestioni qui finem non habet. Dicitergo ad apostolos: Mittam vobis a Patre Paraclitum Spiritum veritatis (Joan.xv, 26). Sed unde sit? nescitis. Si vis scire, audi ipsum dicentem: Hicde Patre procedit.Quid nuncoportet, fratres ? Christum audire, an homines?
難道要屈從於曲折的哲學,違背新舊約全部聖經的看法,去相信神的聖靈是受造的——祂在何處都讀不到祂是受造之物?斷乎不可。它若鄙棄這類人為的推論與詰問的捆綁,轉向它的主的話語,就必行得好得多。因為祂自己在福音書中說明聖靈從何而來;祂自己為這問題定了終結,祂本是無終無盡的。所以祂對眾使徒說:我要從父那裡差保惠師、就是真理的聖靈來(約十五26)。但祂從何而來?你們不知道。你若想知道,就聽祂說:祂是從父出來的。弟兄們,如今當如何行?當聽基督,還是聽人呢?
Shall it acquiesce in tortuous philosophy, and against the opinion of all the Scriptures, both of the Old and of the New Testament, believe the holy Spirit of God to be created, whom it could nowhere read to be a creature? Be it far. It will do far better, if, spurning human conclusions of this kind and the bonds of interrogations, it turn itself to the words of its Lord. For He Himself in the Gospel says whence the Holy Spirit is; He Himself sets an end to the question, He who has no end. He says therefore to the apostles: I will send you from the Father the Paraclete, the Spirit of truth (Joan. XV, 26). But whence is He? You do not know. If you wish to know, hear Him saying: He proceeds from the Father. What now is fitting, brethren? To hear Christ, or men?
157:52
Christus neque factum dixit Spiritum sanctum, sed hoc solum quia de Patre procedit •. Cntrarii dicunt,quiafactus est, et creatus. Puto melius esset ista credere, ut Christus Dominus revelavit, quam ut humana praesumptio concinnavit. Si autem interrogemus eos unde possint probare Spiritum sanctum f factum;cum non habeantde Scripturis certum evidens testimonium, g assumant illud quod dictum est in Evangelio: Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil (Joan. i, 3). Dicunt ergo: Si omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et Spiritus sanctus factus inter omniacredendus est. Hæc non est apta probatio, sed potius scrupulosa collectio. Quæro igitur;
基督並未說聖靈是受造的,只說了這一點:聖靈由父發出。反對者卻說聖靈是被造成、被創造的。我判斷,寧可照基督我主所啟示的去相信這些事,也勝過照人的臆測所拼湊的。但若我們問他們,能從何處證明聖靈是受造的,既然他們在聖經中並無確鑿明白的見證,他們便援引福音中所說的:「萬物是藉著他造的;凡被造的,沒有一樣不是藉著他造的」(約一3)。於是他們說:若萬物都是藉著他造的,那麼聖靈也當被算在萬物之中而受造。這並非恰當的證明,倒不過是吹毛求疵的拼湊。因此我要問:
Christ did not say that the Holy Spirit was made, but only this, that He proceeds from the Father. Our adversaries say that He was made and created. I judge it were better to believe these things as Christ the Lord revealed them than as human presumption has contrived them. But if we should ask them from what source they can prove that the Holy Spirit was made, since they have no sure and clear testimony from the Scriptures, they take up that saying in the Gospel: 'All things were made through Him, and without Him was made nothing that was made' (John 1:3). They therefore say: If all things were made through Him, then the Holy Spirit too must be believed to have been made among all things. This is no fit proof, but rather a scrupulous piecing-together. I ask, then:
157:53
os Joannis,qui haec dicebat,in quo Spiritu loquebatur ? nonne in Spiritu sancto? si ergo in Spiritu loquebatur, ipse utique Spiritus loquebatur. De his autem dicebat,quia per ipsum facta suntomnia quæ utiquein multitudine et ordine creaturarum sunt constituta; non a de semet ipso dicebat Spiritus sanctus, ut ipse quoque intercaeteras creaturas factus ex nihilo crederetur. 4. Testis autem est huj us rei beatus apostolus Paulus,qui nominatim illa, quæ Christum facta sunt, exsequitur. In ipso, inquit, condita sunt omnia quæ in cælis et quæ in terre, visibilia et invisibilia; sive b sedes, sive dominationes, sive principatus, sive potestates:
說這些話的約翰之口——是憑著哪一位靈說話呢?豈不是憑著聖靈嗎?那麼,若他是憑著聖靈說話,說話的便正是聖靈自己。如今聖靈所講論的,是那藉著他所造之物,即凡在受造之物的眾多與次序中所立定的一切;聖靈並非在論及自己,好像他自己也當被算在其餘受造之物中、被信為由無中造成的。使徒保羅便為此事作見證,他逐一指名那些藉著基督所造之物。他說:「因為萬有都是在他裡面造的,無論是天上的、地上的、能看見的、不能看見的,或是有位的、主治的、執政的、掌權的:
the mouth of John, who spoke these things — in what Spirit did it speak? Was it not in the Holy Spirit? If then it spoke in the Spirit, it was surely the Spirit Himself who spoke. Now He was speaking of those things which were made through Him, namely all that is established in the multitude and order of creatures; the Holy Spirit was not speaking of Himself, as though He too were to be believed made from nothing among the rest of the creatures. And the blessed apostle Paul is witness to this matter, who enumerates by name those things that were made through Christ. 'In Him,' he says, 'were created all things that are in the heavens and that are on the earth, visible and invisible; whether thrones, or dominations, or principalities, or powers:'
157:54
omnia per ipsum et in ipso c creata sunt (Coloss.I, 26). Numquid inter omnia cœlestia et terrestria etiam Spiritum sanctum nominavit ? Et utique principaliter nominasset, si eum creatum vel factum, sicut cætera, cognovisset. Si autem tam dure vis intelligere illud quod dictumest,omnia peripsum facta sunt,d ut non excipias Spiritum sanctum quæro quid sentias de eo quod dicit propheta David ad e Deum Dominum,omnia serviunttibi (Ps. CXVIII, 91); numquid Spiritum sanctum inter omnia servire dicis,aut servum appellaris, qui utiquE non est servus, sed Dominus liberans a servitute creaturam? Quod autem sit Dominus Spiritus sanctus,ad Thessalonicenses scribens Paulus sic dicit;
萬有都是藉著他並在他裡面造的」(西一16)。他可曾在天上地上一切之物中一併提到聖靈嗎?倘若他知道聖靈像其餘之物一樣是受造或被造的,他必首先提到聖靈。但你若如此生硬地理解「萬物是藉著他造的」這句話,以致連聖靈也不除外,那麼我要問你,先知大衛對主上帝所說的話你作何解:「萬有都服事你」(詩一一九91)。你是說聖靈在萬有之中服事嗎?還是稱他為僕役——他斷不是僕役,乃是那救受造之物脫離奴役的主?至於聖靈是主,保羅寫給帖撒羅尼迦人時如此說:
all things were created through Him and in Him' (Col. 1:16). Did he anywhere among all the things heavenly and earthly name the Holy Spirit as well? And surely he would have named Him first of all, had he known Him to be created or made like the rest. But if you insist on understanding so harshly the saying, 'all things were made through Him,' so as not to except the Holy Spirit, I ask what you think of what the prophet David says to God the Lord: 'all things serve Thee' (Ps. 118:91). Do you say that the Holy Spirit serves among all things, or do you call Him a servant, who surely is not a servant but the Lord who frees the creature from servitude? That the Holy Spirit is Lord, Paul writing to the Thessalonians says thus:
157:55
Dominusdirigal corda vestra indilectione Domini et tolerantia Christi (II Thess. III, 5). Spiritum sinedubio Dominum dixit,de quoet ipse Salva. tor ad apostoJosdixerat, quia ipse vos diriget in omnem veritatem (Joan. XVI, 13). Adhuc evidentius docet Paulusdicens; Dominus est Spiritus; ubi autem Spiritus Domini, ibi libertas (II Cor. III, 17). Etad Romanos:Non,inquit, accepistis Spiritum servitutis iterumin timore, sed accepistis Spiritum adoptionis (Rom. VIII, 15). Si Spiirtus adoptionis est, et facithomines filios Dei, quomodo ipse in servili conditione ponitur,cum servus non possit legitime liberare ? Quoniam, inquit, estis filii, misit Deus Spiritum Filii sui in corda vestra declamantem:
「願主引導你們的心,得著上帝的愛與基督的忍耐」(帖後三5)。他無疑稱聖靈為主,救主自己也曾對使徒論到聖靈說:「他要引導你們進入一切真理」(約十六13)。保羅更明白地教導說:「主就是那靈;主的靈在哪裡,那裡就得以自由」(林後三17)。他又對羅馬人說:「你們所受的,不是奴僕的心,仍舊害怕;所受的乃是兒子的靈」(羅八15)。他若是使人為子的靈,並且使人作上帝的兒子,怎能被置於奴僕的地位呢?既然僕役不能合法地釋放人。他說:「你們既為兒子,上帝就差他兒子的靈進入你們的心,呼叫:
'May the Lord direct your hearts in the love of God and the patience of Christ' (2 Thess. 3:5). Without doubt he called the Spirit Lord, of whom the Saviour Himself had also said to the apostles that 'He shall direct you into all truth' (John 16:13). Still more plainly does Paul teach, saying: 'The Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty' (2 Cor. 3:17). And to the Romans: 'You have not received,' he says, 'the spirit of bondage again in fear, but you have received the Spirit of adoption' (Rom. 8:15). If He is the Spirit of adoption, and makes men sons of God, how is He set in a servile condition, since a servant cannot lawfully set free? 'Because,' he says, 'you are sons, God has sent the Spirit of His Son into your hearts crying out:'
157:56
Abba, Pater.Si autem Filius, et hæres per Deum;ergo jam non est servus, sed Filiusf (Gal. iv,6).Si me Christus liberum facit et Filium et proprii nominis divinitatis sueeheredem, impiusero si eum servum dixeroqui me liberum facit. Libertas autem Spiritus in hoc etiam manifestatur, quod dicit. Apostolus: Omnia operatur unus atque idem Spiritus, dividens singulis prout vult (I Cor. XII, 11). Ubi voluntaria distributio prædicatur, non potest viJeri conditio servitutis. In creatura enim servitus intelligenda est; in g Trinitate vero dominatio et libertas.
阿爸,父。」「你既是兒子,就藉著上帝為後嗣;如此,他已不再是奴僕,乃是兒子」(加四6-7)。基督若使我得自由、作兒子、並作那以他自己名為名之神性的後嗣,我若稱那使我得自由者為僕役,便是不敬虔了。再者,聖靈的自由也在此顯明,正如使徒所說:「這一切都是這位獨一的、同一的聖靈所運行,隨己意分給各人的」(林前十二11)。凡宣告出於自願的分配之處,便不可見有奴役的地位。因為奴役當於受造之物中理解;至於三位一體中,則是主權與自由。
'Abba, Father.' 'And if a son, then an heir through God; therefore he is now no longer a servant, but a son' (Gal. 4:6-7). If Christ makes me free and a son and heir of the divinity that bears His own name, I shall be impious if I should call Him a servant who makes me free. Moreover the liberty of the Spirit is manifested also in this, that the Apostle says: 'One and the same Spirit works all things, dividing to each severally as He wills' (1 Cor. 12:11). Where a voluntary distribution is proclaimed, no condition of servitude can be seen. For in a creature servitude is to be understood; but in the Trinity, lordship and liberty.
157:57
Ergo si illud quod dictum est in psalmo omnia serviunt tibi ad creaturas pertinet et non ad Spiritum sanctum, hoc quoque dictum, omnia per ipsum facta sunt h, non Spiritum sanctum interomnia'concludit; quia neoex aliqua materia aut ex nihilo factus legitur, qui i de Patre procedit. 5. Sufficit itaque fidelibus hoc scire quia Filius quidem. genitus eat, Spiritus autem de Patre prooedens est: et ipsis utamur verbis quibus uti divina Scriptura nos voluit.
所以,倘若詩篇中所說「萬有都服事你」是指受造之物而非指聖靈,那麼「萬物是藉著他造的」這句話,也就不把聖靈包括在萬有之中;因為那由父發出者,經上從未記載他是由任何物質或由無中造成的。因此,對信徒而言,知道這一點就足夠了:子固然是受生的,而聖靈乃是由父發出的;讓我們就用聖經願我們所用的那些話。
Therefore if that which is said in the psalm, 'all things serve Thee,' pertains to the creatures and not to the Holy Spirit, then this saying also, 'all things were made through Him,' does not enclose the Holy Spirit among all things; for He who proceeds from the Father is nowhere read to have been made from any matter or from nothing. It is enough, then, for the faithful to know this: that the Son indeed is begotten, but the Spirit is proceeding from the Father; and let us use those very words which the divine Scripture willed us to use.
157:58
Qui autem diligit vitam, etvite novit auctorem, et trium nominum socio honore suscepi t in baptismi sacramento,nec j am illic terminum quaerit, ubi certum erat non fuisse principium, in quo,credidit.Credimusergo Spiritum san<5tumPara cum cie Patre procedere: esse autem non Filium, neque Filium Filii, quod solent j stulte conquirere; sed Spiritum veritatis,cujus processio aut qualis aut quantasit,nulliconceditur, scire.Nam de incomprehensibilitate ipsius Spiritus Dominus quoque in Evangelio dixit: Quia Spiritus ubi vult spirat, et vocemejus audis, sed nescis unde veniat aut quovadat (Joan.III, 8). Hunc Spiritumnovimus in persona esse propria et vera;
但那愛慕生命、認識生命之創始者、並在洗禮的聖事中以三名共有之尊榮領受了他的人——他就不當在那裡尋求終結,那既確知並無起頭之處,就是他所信的那一位。因此我們相信聖靈保惠師是由父發出的;但他不是子,也不是子之子(如他們慣於愚昧地探問的那樣);乃是真理的靈,他的發出是何等樣式、何等程度,並不容許任何人得知。因為論到聖靈自身的不可測度,主在福音中也說:「風隨著意思吹,你聽見風的響聲,卻不曉得從哪裡來、往哪裡去」(約三8)。我們認識這位聖靈乃有其自己真實的位格;
But he who loves life, and knows the Author of life, and has received Him in the shared honour of the three Names in the sacrament of baptism — let him not there seek an end where it is certain there was no beginning, in which he has believed. We believe therefore that the Holy Spirit the Paraclete proceeds from the Father; but that He is not the Son, nor the Son of the Son, as they are wont foolishly to inquire; but the Spirit of truth, whose procession, of what kind or how great it is, is granted to no one to know. For concerning the incomprehensibility of the Spirit Himself the Lord also said in the Gospel: 'For the Spirit breathes where He wills, and you hear His voice, but you know not whence He comes or whither He goes' (John 3:8). This Spirit we know to be in His own true person;
157:59
fontem sanctificationis, lumen animarum, divisorem gratiarum. Hic Spiritus sanctificat, non sanotifieatur.; illuminat, non illuminatur: nec ulla creatura sine hoc Spiritu aut.ad æternitatem pervenire, aut vere sancta. poterit nominari. Audeo dicere; templum ipsum Domini,id est corpus quod accepit ex Virgine, certe ipso Spiritu instructum est, Et dixit Gabriel angelus ad, Mariam: Spiritus sanctus veniet in te, et virtus A ltissimi obum brabit te; ideoque quod nascetur ex te, de Spinitu sancto est (Luc. I, 35). Ecce ipsum templum,in quo verbum Dominihabitavit, invenimus ab Spiritu sanctificatum. Et licet dicat ipse Dominus dese,QuemPater sanctificavit et misit in hunc mundum (Joan. x, 36);
他是成聖的泉源,是眾靈魂的光,是諸恩賜的分授者。這位聖靈使人成聖,自己卻不被成聖;光照人,自己卻不被光照;沒有一個受造之物離了這聖靈,能得永恆,或能真被稱為聖潔。我斗膽說:主的聖殿本身——即他從童貞女所取的身體——確是由聖靈自己所裝備的。天使加百列對馬利亞說:「聖靈要臨到你身上,至高者的能力要蔭庇你;因此所要生的必稱為聖潔的,是由聖靈而來的」(路一35)。你看,道所居住的那聖殿,我們發現它是由聖靈所成聖的。雖然主論到自己說:「就是父所分別為聖、差到世上來的」(約十36);
the fountain of sanctification, the light of souls, the distributor of graces. This Spirit sanctifies, is not sanctified; enlightens, is not enlightened; nor can any creature without this Spirit either attain to eternity or be named truly holy. I dare to say: the very temple of the Lord — that is, the body which He took from the Virgin — was assuredly furnished by the Spirit Himself. And the angel Gabriel said to Mary: 'The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow thee; and therefore that which is born of thee is of the Holy Spirit' (Luke 1:35). Behold, that very temple in which the Word of the Lord dwelt we find sanctified by the Spirit. And although the Lord Himself says of Himself, 'Whom the Father sanctified and sent into this world' (John 10:36);
157:60
et iterum, Potestenim Filius Dei et suum corpus et omnia sanctificare (Joan. XVII, 19): tamen ut virtutem et proprietatem sancti Spiritus saeculo manifestaret,tempore baptimastis in specie columbæ ipse in suum corpus recepit Spiritum sanctum, ut vere secundum Apostolidictum omnis in eo habitaret plenitudo divinitatiscorporaliter: deqna plenitudinepostmodumaccipiunt apostoli gratiam Dro crratia. ioso inspirante Domino in faciemapostolorum, et dicente: Accipite Spiritum sanctum; si cujus peccata dimis eritis, dimissa erunt; si cujus tenueritis,tenebuntur (Joan. xx, 22). Ei cum scriptum sit, Quis poterit peccata dimittere nisi solus Deus (Luc. v, 21):
又說:「因為上帝的兒子能使自己的身體和萬物成聖」(約十七19):然而為要向世人顯明聖靈的能力與特性,他在受洗之時親自以鴿子的形狀將聖靈接受到自己的身體裡,使得照使徒所說的,上帝本性一切的豐盛都有形有體地居住在他裡面;使徒後來便從這豐盛裡恩上加恩地領受,主自己向使徒的臉吹氣說:「你們受聖靈;你們赦免誰的罪,誰的罪就赦免了;你們留下誰的罪,誰的罪就留下了」(約二十22-23)。既然經上記著說:「除了上帝以外,誰能赦罪呢?」(路五21):
and again, 'For the Son of God can sanctify both His own body and all things' (John 17:19): yet in order to manifest to the world the power and property of the Holy Spirit, at the time of His baptism He Himself received the Holy Spirit into His own body in the form of a dove, so that truly, according to the Apostle's saying, all the fullness of the Godhead dwelt in Him bodily; from which fullness the apostles afterward receive grace for grace, the Lord Himself breathing upon the face of the apostles and saying: 'Receive the Holy Spirit; if you forgive anyone's sins, they shall be forgiven; if you retain anyone's, they shall be retained' (John 20:22-23). And since it is written, 'Who can forgive sins but God alone?' (Luke 5:21):
157:61
ecce apostoli in Christi potestate peccata dimittere, perhibentur. Cognita est itaque quanta sit sanctificatio Spiritus, ubi Dominico ipsi corpori accommodata monstratur: cogpitaesti et potestas Spiritus, cum peccata dimittit. 6. Veniamus ergo ad cæteras ejus virtutes et opera, ut quid et quantus sit Spiritus sanctus possit agnosci. Siout enim Pater et Filius nisi per opera agnoscuntur, ut ipse Dominus ait, vel operibus meis credite (Joan. x. 38); ita et Spiritus sanctus nisi per operum insignia, quid sit non potest plenius sciri. Nemo itaque aaDxietcum de Spiritus sancti virtute capitula proferimus; nemo aures claudat cum divinaverba recitantur:
你看,使徒顯明是憑基督的權柄赦罪的。這樣,聖靈的成聖之工何等浩大便已為人所知,既顯明施用於主自己的身體之上;聖靈的權能也已為人所知,就是他赦罪之時。那麼,讓我們來到他其餘的能力與作為,好使人認清聖靈是什麼、何等偉大。因為正如父與子惟獨藉著他們的作為方被認識——正如主自己所說:「就當因我所做的事信我」(約十38)——照樣,聖靈是什麼,若非藉著他作為的標記,便不能被更充分地認識。所以當我們提出關於聖靈能力的各項要點時,願無人為此焦慮;當神聖的話語被誦讀時,願無人塞住耳朵:
behold, the apostles are shown to forgive sins in the power of Christ. Thus it has become known how great is the sanctification of the Spirit, where it is shown applied to the Lord's own body; and known too is the power of the Spirit, when He forgives sins. Let us come, then, to His other powers and works, that it may be recognized what and how great the Holy Spirit is. For just as the Father and the Son are recognized only through their works, as the Lord Himself says, 'or believe My works' (John 10:38), so also the Holy Spirit cannot be more fully known as to what He is except through the marks of His works. Let no one therefore grow anxious when we bring forward headings concerning the power of the Holy Spirit; let no one close his ears when the divine words are recited:
157:62
plus debent credere cœlestia testimonia, quam terrena figmenta. Quid ergo est quod volumus ? ad signa Dominica sine dubio traditionem. Si enim in nomine Patris et Filii non sine Spiritu saneto renascimur, non sine Spiritu sancto sanctificamur, atque ad æternitatem proficiscimur, cupimus ostendere quia non solum in baptismo, sed etiam in aliis omnibus cum Patre et Filio Spiritus sanctus operatus est et semper operetur. 7. Quamquam sufficeret hoc, solum, quod in baptismi sacramento cooperatua invenitur; quia ex hoc et alia intelliguntur non sine Spiritu esse creata.
天上的見證比地上的虛構更當被相信。那麼我們所要的是什麼呢?無疑,是要把這傳統帶回主自己的記號。因為我們若非離了聖靈就奉父與子的名重生,若非離了聖靈就得成聖並邁向永恆,我們就渴望顯明:不僅在洗禮中,而且在其餘一切作為中,聖靈都曾與父和子一同運行、並永遠一同運行。然而單這一點便已足夠:即發現他在洗禮的聖事中一同運作;因為由此便可明白,其餘之事也不是離了聖靈而受造的。
the heavenly testimonies ought to be believed more than earthly fictions. What then is it that we intend? Assuredly, to bring the tradition back to the Lord's own signs. For if we are reborn in the name of the Father and of the Son not without the Holy Spirit, if we are sanctified not without the Holy Spirit, and set out toward eternity, we desire to show that not only in baptism but also in all other works the Holy Spirit has worked and ever works together with the Father and the Son. And yet this alone would suffice: that He is found to cooperate in the sacrament of baptism; for from this the other things too are understood not to have been created without the Spirit.
157:63
Quale est revera renovatio quidem et reparatio hominis cum Spiritu fiat, figuratio autem hominis et creatio, sine Spirituesse credatur ? AD. dubium est alicui, plus esse baptismi sacramentum, quam ipsa exordia creaturae ? quia im baptismo æternitas perficitur, in exordio autem morsregnavit ab Adam. Audiamus ergo David decreatione prophetantem Domini cœli firmatisunt, et Spirituoris ejus omnis virtus eorum (Ps. XXXII, 6). Verbum hoc utique Filius intelligendus est, secundum Joannis præconium per quem omnia facta sunt. Spiritus autem oris non alius est,. nisriste qui creditur sanctus. Habes utique in uno versiculo Dominum,et verbum Domini et Spiritum sanctum Trinitatis adimpleturum mysterium.
說真的,人的更新與修復被信為是藉著聖靈成就的,而人的塑造與創造卻被信為是離了聖靈的,這算是什麼樣的事呢?洗禮的聖事豈不明明比受造之物起初的開端更為偉大嗎?因為在洗禮中永恆得以成全,而在起初,死卻從亞當作了王。那麼,讓我們聽大衛預言論及創造:「諸天藉耶和華的話而堅立,萬象藉他口中的氣而成」(詩三十三6)。這「話」無疑當理解為子,正如約翰所宣告的「萬物是藉著他造的」。而他口中的「氣」,也不是別的,正是那被信為聖潔的一位。這樣,你便在一節短短的經文中,有了主、主的話、與聖靈,成全三位一體的奧祕。
What sort of thing is it, in truth, that the renewal and repair of man should be believed to come about with the Spirit, but the forming and creation of man to be without the Spirit? Is it doubtful to anyone that the sacrament of baptism is something greater than the very beginnings of the creature? For in baptism eternity is perfected, but in the beginning death reigned from Adam. Let us hear, then, David prophesying of the creation: 'By the word of the Lord the heavens were established, and by the Spirit of His mouth all their power' (Ps. 32:6). This Word is surely to be understood as the Son, according to John's proclamation, 'through whom all things were made.' But the Spirit of His mouth is no other than He who is believed to be holy. You have then in one little verse the Lord, and the word of the Lord, and the Holy Spirit, fulfilling the mystery of the Trinity.
157:64
Quod si verbum hoc, per quod cælifirmati sunt, aliquia imprudenterjussionem interpretari voluerit; b Spiritum æque aera sołubilem dixecit; paulatim in Judaismum cadat neoesse est: quia nec Photinus necJudaeiper verbum substantivum et Spiritum concedunt esse. aliquid procreatum. 8. Sed dices: De verbo quidem manifestum esi quod creaverit; quid de Spiritu ? Accipe aliud testi,. monium justissimi illius at antiquissimi Job. Spiritus, inquit, divinus qui fecit me (Job. XXXIII, 4). Et David psallens dicit ad Deum: Emitte Spiritum tuum et creabuntar,et renovabis faciem terræ (Ps.CIII, 30). Si creatio et renovatio per Spiritum, erit, sine dubio et. principium creationis sine Spiritunon fuit.
但若有輕率之人想把這「話」——即諸天藉以堅立者——解釋為一道命令,並照樣說那靈如空氣般可以消散,他就勢必漸漸墮入猶太教;因為無論是弗提努斯還是猶太人,都不承認有什麼是藉著那本體之道與聖靈所生出的。但你要說:關於「道」創造之事固然明顯;那麼「靈」又如何呢?請領受那至公義、至古老的約伯的另一個見證。他說:「上帝的靈造了我」(伯三十三4)。大衛歌唱時對上帝說:「你發出你的靈,牠們便受造;你使地面更換為新」(詩一〇四30)。創造與更新若要藉著聖靈成就,那麼創造之始無疑也不是離了聖靈的。
But if some imprudent person should wish to interpret this word, through which the heavens were established, as a command, and should likewise call the Spirit as dissoluble as air, it is necessary that he fall little by little into Judaism; for neither Photinus nor the Jews concede that anything was procreated through the substantive Word and the Spirit. But you will say: Concerning the Word it is indeed manifest that He created; what of the Spirit? Receive another testimony from that most just and most ancient Job. 'The divine Spirit,' he says, 'who made me' (Job 33:4). And David singing says to God: 'Send forth Thy Spirit, and they shall be created, and Thou shalt renew the face of the earth' (Ps. 103:30). If creation and renewal shall be through the Spirit, then without doubt the beginning of creation too was not without the Spirit.
157:65
Sed solent I hic, qui veritati resistunt,argute Spiritus vocabulum etpersonamad Filium convertere, sicubi creator I Spiritus invenitur; quia et Filius Spiritus est, sicut et Pater Spiritus. Quod utique nonest credendum pravae argumentationi, vel ex hoc ipso quia David et verbum Domini dixit, quod est Filius; et Spiritum nihilominus pradicavit, qui est sanctus: verbum quidem firmans cœlos, Spiritum autem omnem \ virtutem eorum, hoeest cornatum. Aut credaot ergoquihæc legunt; aut si nolunt credere, quid et legunt ? Ne quis autem putet hanc d credulitatem ad Dei Patris contumeliam pertinere, cum potius ad gloriam' exspectet, si ejus verbumcujus ipse Pater, aut ejus Spiritus cujus ipse auctor.
但那些抗拒真理的人,慣於在此狡猾地把聖靈的名與位格轉為子,凡見聖靈為創造者之處便如此;因為子也是靈,正如父也是靈。這斷不可讓給他們乖謬的辯論,即便單從此事:大衛既說了「主的話」,即子;同樣也宣告了聖靈,即那聖潔者:那「話」堅立諸天,而那「氣」則成其萬象,即其裝飾。那麼讀這些話的人,或當相信;若他們不肯相信,又何必讀它們呢?但願無人以為這信仰有損於父上帝的體面,因為它反倒歸於他的榮耀,如果那藉以創造萬物者,是他為其父的道、與他為其創始者的靈——
But those who resist the truth are wont here craftily to turn the name and person of the Spirit into the Son, wherever the Spirit is found as creator; because the Son too is Spirit, just as the Father also is Spirit. This surely is not to be conceded to their perverse argumentation, even from this very fact, that David both said 'the word of the Lord,' which is the Son, and no less proclaimed the Spirit, who is holy: the word indeed establishing the heavens, but the Spirit all their power, that is, their adornment. Let them therefore either believe, who read these things; or if they will not believe, why do they even read them? But let no one think that this belief pertains to the reproach of God the Father, since rather it looks to His glory, if He whose Word it is that is Father, or whose Spirit it is that is Author,
157:66
eat, creasse omnia referatur; ipse enim f creat omnia, cum verbum ejus creant et Spiritus. 9. Post creationem igitur ostendamus quia vivificat Trinitas. Et quidem de persona refert Apostolus. Testor coram Deo qui vivificat omnia Tim.V, 21; VI, 13). Vitam vero dat Christus: Oves, inquit, meæ vocem meamaudiunt;et ego dabo eis vitamæternam (Joan. X, 27). Vivificamur vero per Spiritum, ipso Domino dicente, Spiritus est qui vivificat (Joan. VI, 64). Similiter et Paulus ad Romanos i Qui suseit avit Christum a mortuis, g vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra, propter inhabitantem Spiritum ejus in vobis (Rom. VIII,. 11).
被說為創造了萬物;因為他自己創造萬物,既然他的道與他的靈創造。那麼在創造之後,讓我們顯明三位一體賜生命。的確,論到位格,使徒作見證說:「我在那賜萬物生命的上帝面前囑咐你」(提前六13)。基督也賜生命:他說:「我的羊聽我的聲音;我又賜給他們永生」(約十27-28)。我們得生命卻是藉著聖靈,主自己說:「叫人活著的乃是靈」(約六63)。保羅同樣對羅馬人說:「那叫基督從死裡復活的,也必藉著住在你們心裡的聖靈,使你們必死的身體又活過來」(羅八11)。
is said to have created all things; for He Himself creates all things, since His Word and His Spirit create. After the creation, then, let us show that the Trinity gives life. And indeed concerning the Person the Apostle testifies: 'I charge thee before God, who gives life to all things' (1 Tim. 6:13). And Christ gives life: 'My sheep,' He says, 'hear My voice; and I give them eternal life' (John 10:27). But we are given life through the Spirit, the Lord Himself saying, 'It is the Spirit that gives life' (John 6:63). Likewise Paul to the Romans: 'He who raised up Christ from the dead shall also give life to your mortal bodies, because of His Spirit that dwells in you' (Rom. 8:11).
157:67
Ecce una vivificatio Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti aperte monstrata est. iO.Præscientia omniumreram in Deo est, et occultorum cognitor est. Licet nemo Christianus ignoret, tamen ex Danielis libro monstrandum est. Deus, inquit, qui occultorum cognitor es, Quis prospicis omnia ante quam nascantur (Dan. XIH, 42). Hmc eadem præscentia in Christo est, dicente evangelista: Ab initio, inquit, sciebat Jesus I qui esset eum traditurus, vel qui. essent non credentes (Joan.VI, 65). Quod sit autem oocultorum cognitor, ex boo manif festatum est, cum obscura consilia Judaeorum, manifestans dicebat: Quid cogitatis nequam in cordibus vestris (Matth. ixr 4) ? 11.
你看,父、子、與聖靈同一的賜生之工便公然顯明了。萬事的預知在於上帝,他也是隱祕之事的鑒察者。雖無一基督徒不知此事,然而仍須從但以理書加以顯明。他說:「上帝啊,你是鑒察隱祕之事的,在事情未發生以先便都預見」(但十三42)。這同一的預知也在基督裡,正如福音記者所說:「耶穌從起頭就知道誰要賣他、誰是不信的」(約六64)。至於他是隱祕之事的鑒察者,由此顯明:他揭露猶太人隱晦的謀算時說:「你們為什麼心裡懷著惡念呢?」(太九4)
Behold, one life-giving of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is openly shown. The foreknowledge of all things is in God, and He is the discerner of hidden things. Although no Christian is ignorant of this, yet it must be shown from the book of Daniel. 'God,' he says, 'who art the discerner of hidden things, who foreseest all things before they come to be' (Dan. 13:42). This same foreknowledge is in Christ, as the evangelist says: 'From the beginning,' he says, 'Jesus knew who they were that should betray Him, or who were the unbelieving' (John 6:64). And that He is the discerner of hidden things is manifested from this, when, making manifest the obscure counsels of the Jews, He said: 'Why do you think evil in your hearts?' (Matt. 9:4)
157:68
Similiter præscire omnia Spiritum, Deus mani festavit dicens ad apostolos: Cum venerit Spiritus veritatis, docebit vos omnia, et ventura annuntiabit vobis (Joan. xvi J3). Qui veaturaannuntiare perhibetur, puto praescire omnia non dubitabitur, quia ipseh scrutatur altitudines Dei, et i novit omnia quæ sunt Dei. Nec non et sacramenta revelat Dei; testatur Damel dioens: Ipse est Deus deorum, et rex regum, qui sacramenta revelat (Dan. II, 47). Revelantur omnia per Christum,sicut ipse ait: Nemo novit Patrem nisi Filius et cui voluerit Filius revelare (Luc. x,22). Omnis vero in Spiritu revelatio est; testatur PauIus: Nobis, inquit, revelavit Deus per Spiritum sanctum suum (Cor. II, 10).
同樣,上帝也顯明聖靈預知萬事,他對使徒說:「只等真理的靈來了,他要引導你們明白一切,並要把將來的事告訴你們」(約十六13)。那被宣告要把將來之事告知人的,我想無人會懷疑他預知萬事,既然他自己參透上帝深奧的事,並知道上帝一切的事。此外,他也啟示上帝的奧祕;但以理作見證說:「他是萬神之神、萬王之王,是啟示奧祕的」(但二47)。萬事都藉基督啟示,正如他自己所說:「除了子和子所願意指示的,沒有人知道父」(路十22)。而一切啟示都在於聖靈;保羅作見證說:「上帝藉著他的聖靈向我們啟示了」(林前二10)。
Likewise God manifested that the Spirit foreknows all things, saying to the apostles: 'When the Spirit of truth shall come, He shall teach you all things, and shall announce to you the things to come' (John 16:13). He who is declared to announce the things to come will not, I think, be doubted to foreknow all things, since He Himself searches the depths of God, and knows all things that are of God. Moreover He also reveals the sacraments of God; Daniel testifies, saying: 'He is the God of gods, and the King of kings, who reveals sacraments' (Dan. 2:47). All things are revealed through Christ, as He Himself says: 'No one knows the Father but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal Him' (Luke 10:22). But all revelation is in the Spirit; Paul testifies: 'To us,' he says, 'God has revealed it through His Holy Spirit' (1 Cor. 2:10).
157:69
Ecceest revelatiounius Trinitatis Deus. 12. Quod ubiquc sit praesens,etimpleat omnia,dicente Esaia:Ego, inquit, Deus approximans. Et Deus de longinquo (Isa. xxx, 27). Si absconditus fuerit homo in absconditis. numquid non videbo eum fnonne cælum et terram ego impleo (Jerem. XXIII, 24)?Quid autem de sua praesentia, qui ubique? Et Salvator Christus in Evangelio dicit: Ubicumque fuerint duo vel tres * in nomine meo, ibi et ego sum in medio ipsorum (Matth. XVIII, 20). De plenitudine autem ej us apostolus refert: Qui descendit, ipse est et qui ascendit super omnesc cælos ut adimpleret omnia (Eph. iv,40). DeSpirituaequesanctoquodb adsitubique,dicitpropheta ex persona Domini:
你看,這位上帝乃是那獨一三位一體的啟示。至於他無所不在、充滿萬有,以賽亞說:「我是近在身旁的上帝,也是遠在天邊的上帝」(參耶二十三23)。「人若藏在隱密處,我豈看不見他嗎?我豈不充滿天地嗎?」(耶二十三24)但那無所不在者,論到他自己的臨在又如何呢?救主基督在福音中也說:「無論在哪裡,有兩三個人奉我的名聚集,那裡就有我在他們中間」(太十八20)。論到他的豐盛,使徒述說:「那降下的,就是遠升諸天之上要充滿萬有的」(弗四10)。同樣論到聖靈無所不在,先知以主的口吻說:
Behold, the God who is the revelation of the one Trinity. That He is everywhere present and fills all things, Isaiah says: 'I am,' he says, 'a God at hand, and a God from afar' (Isa. — cf. Jer. 23:23). 'If a man shall be hidden in secret places, shall I not see him? Do I not fill heaven and earth?' (Jer. 23:24) But what of His own presence, who is everywhere? Christ the Saviour also says in the Gospel: 'Wherever two or three shall be gathered in My name, there am I also in the midst of them' (Matt. 18:20). And of His fullness the apostle relates: 'He who descended is the same also who ascended above all the heavens, that He might fill all things' (Eph. 4:10). Concerning the Holy Spirit likewise, that He is present everywhere, the prophet says in the person of the Lord:
157:70
Ego in vobis, et Spiritus meus stat in medio vestrum (Agg. II, 6). Et Salomon ait: Spiritus Domini replevit orbem terrarum (Sap.l, 7). Habitat Deus in sanctis suis,secundum promissionem quam dixerat, Habitabo in illis et inambulabo (II Cor. vi, 16). Quid vero Dominus in Evangelio dicit ? Manete in me et ego vobis (Joan. xv, 4). Probat autem hoc Paulus: Nescitis quia Jesus Christus in vobis est (II Cor. XIII, 5) ? Hoc autem totum in Spiritus habitatione adimpletur,sicut memorat Joannes:Ex hoc,inquit, scimus guia in nobis est,de Spiritu suo, quem dedit nobis (I Joan. in, 24). Similiter et idem Paulus: Nescitis quia templum Dei estis. et Spiritus Dei habitat in vobis (II Cor. III, 16) ?
「我在你們中間,我的靈也站立在你們當中」(該二5-6)。所羅門說:「主的靈充滿了世界」(智一7)。上帝住在他的聖徒裡,照著他所說的應許:「我要在他們中間居住往來」(林後六16)。但主在福音中說什麼呢?「你們要常在我裡面,我也常在你們裡面」(約十五4)。保羅也證實這事:「豈不知耶穌基督是在你們心裡嗎?」(林後十三5)而這一切都在聖靈的內住中得以成全,正如約翰所記:「我們所以知道他住在我們裡面,是因他所賜給我們的聖靈」(約壹三24)。這同一位保羅同樣說:「豈不知你們是上帝的殿,上帝的靈住在你們裡頭嗎?」(林前三16)
'I am among you, and My Spirit stands in the midst of you' (Hag. 2:6). And Solomon says: 'The Spirit of the Lord has filled the whole world' (Wisd. 1:7). God dwells in His saints, according to the promise which He had spoken: 'I will dwell in them and walk among them' (2 Cor. 6:16). But what does the Lord say in the Gospel? 'Abide in Me, and I in you' (John 15:4). And Paul proves this: 'Know you not that Jesus Christ is in you?' (2 Cor. 13:5) But all this is fulfilled in the indwelling of the Spirit, as John records: 'By this,' he says, 'we know that He abides in us, by the Spirit which He has given us' (1 John 3:24). Likewise the same Paul: 'Know you not that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwells in you?' (1 Cor. 3:16)
157:71
Et mox dicit: Glorificate et portate Deum in corpore vestro (I Cor. vi, 20). 13. Nam quod arguat Pater, arguat et Filius, arguat etiam et Spiritus sanctus,ita probandum est. In Psalmo XLIX legitur: Peccatori autem dixit Deus: quare tu enarras justilias meas (Ps. XLIX, i6) ? Et infra: Arguam te et statuam c illam contra faciem tuam (Ibid., 2i). David æque orans dicit ad Deum: Domine, ne in ira tua arguas me (Ps. VI, 2). Et quia ipse venturus est arguere omnem carnem (Jud. 15). Quid vero de Spiritu sancto salvator in Evangelio ? Cum venerit,inquit, Paraclitus ille, arguet mundumde peccato et de justitia et de judicio (Joan. xvi, 8).Hoc providens David clamabat ad Deum:
他隨即又說:「你們要在自己的身子上榮耀上帝、擔負上帝」(林前六20)。至於父責備、子也責備、聖靈也責備,須如此證明。詩篇四十九篇讀到:「上帝對惡人說:你怎敢傳講我的律例?」(詩五十16)下文又說:「我要責備你,將這些事擺在你眼前」(同上21)。大衛同樣禱告時對上帝說:「耶和華啊,求你不要在怒中責備我」(詩六1)。並且因他自己要來責備一切屬肉體的人(猶15)。至於聖靈,救主在福音中說什麼呢?他說:「那保惠師來了,就要為罪、為義、為審判責備世人」(約十六8)。大衛預見此事,向上帝呼喊:
And soon he says: 'Glorify and bear God in your body' (1 Cor. 6:20). Now that the Father reproves, and the Son also reproves, and the Holy Spirit also reproves, must be proved thus. In Psalm 49 it is read: 'But to the sinner God has said: why do you declare My justices?' (Ps. 49:16) And below: 'I will reprove you, and set that before your face' (ibid. 21). David likewise praying says to God: 'O Lord, reprove me not in Thy wrath' (Ps. 6:2). And because He Himself is to come to reprove all flesh (Jude 15). But what does the Saviour say in the Gospel concerning the Holy Spirit? 'When that Paraclete comes,' He says, 'He shall reprove the world of sin, and of justice, and of judgment' (John 16:8). Foreseeing this, David cried out to God:
157:72
Quo ibo a Spiritu tuo, et a facie tua quo fugiam (Ps. CXXXVIII, 7)? Quod sit autem unum judicium a a Deo per Christum futurum, beatus Paulus ostendit: cum judicabit, i n qu i t, Deus occu Ita hominum um per Jes urn Christum Dominum nostrum (Rom. II, 16). Et quia Spiritus sanctusjudicaturus est Antichristum, dicente Paulo, cum de persona ejus loqueretur: Quem interficiet, ait,Dominus Jesus Spiritu ori sui (II Thess. II, 8). Si Antichristus Spiritu oris Domini interficitur, ergo et omnis creatura Spiritu judicabitur, dicente Salomone: Contra illos statuet Spiritus virtutis, et tamquam turbo venti dividet eos (Sap. v, 24). ii.
「我往哪裡去躲避你的靈?我往哪裡逃、躲避你的面?」(詩一三九7)至於將有藉基督從上帝而來的獨一審判,蒙福的保羅顯明說:他說「上帝要藉著耶穌基督我主,審判人隱祕的事」(羅二16)。而聖靈要審判敵基督,保羅論到敵基督的位分時說:他說「主耶穌要用他口中的氣把他殺滅」(帖後二8)。敵基督若被主口中的氣所殺滅,那麼一切受造之物也都要被那靈所審判,正如所羅門所說:「有能力的靈要起來抵擋他們,如狂風把他們吹散」(智五23)。
'Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit, and whither shall I flee from Thy face?' (Ps. 138:7) That there is to be one judgment from God through Christ, blessed Paul shows: 'when God shall judge,' he says, 'the hidden things of men through Jesus Christ our Lord' (Rom. 2:16). And that the Holy Spirit is to judge Antichrist, Paul says, when he spoke of his person: 'Whom the Lord Jesus shall slay,' he says, 'with the Spirit of His mouth' (2 Thess. 2:8). If Antichrist is slain by the Spirit of the Lord's mouth, then every creature also shall be judged by the Spirit, as Solomon says: 'Against them the Spirit of power shall take His stand, and like a whirlwind of the wind shall divide them' (Wisd. 5:23).
157:73
Nam et quod bonus Pater, bonus Filius, bonus Spiritus sanctus,sic probatur.De Patre quidem diiit Unigenitus in Evangelio: Nemo bonus nisi unus Deus (Matth. XIX, 17). De se autem: Ego sum pastor bonus (Joan. x, 11). De Spiritu aeque David psaUens dicit: Spiritus tuus bonusdeducetme in viam rectam (Ps. CXLII). Et sicut diciturde Filio, Rectum est verbum Domini (Ps. XXXII, 4), sic et de Spiritu dicitur Spiritum rectum innova in visceribus meis (Ps.L, 10). 15. Quis autem illam dignitatem Spiritus sancti possit tacere? Antiqui enim prophetae clamabant: Hæc dicit Dominus. Hanc vocem Christus adveniens in suam revoca vit personam dicens: Et ego dico vobis. Novi autem prophetae quid clamant?
至於父是善的、子是善的、聖靈也是善的,如此證明。論到父,獨生子在福音中說:「除了上帝一位以外,再沒有良善的」(太十九17)。論到自己:「我是好牧人」(約十11)。論到聖靈,大衛歌唱時同樣說:「你至善的靈必引我走正直的路」(詩一四三10)。並且正如論到子說「耶和華的言語正直」(詩三十三4),照樣論到聖靈也說:「求你使我裡面重新有正直的靈」(詩五十一10)。但誰能默然不言聖靈那尊榮呢?因為古時的先知呼喊說:「主如此說。」這聲音基督降臨時取歸己身,說:「只是我告訴你們。」而新約的眾先知又呼喊什麼呢?
For that the Father is good, the Son good, and the Holy Spirit good, is thus proved. Of the Father indeed the Only-begotten said in the Gospel: 'None is good but one God' (Matt. 19:17). But of Himself: 'I am the good shepherd' (John 10:11). Of the Spirit likewise David singing says: 'Thy good Spirit shall lead me into the right way' (Ps. 142:10). And as it is said of the Son, 'Right is the word of the Lord' (Ps. 32:4), so also of the Spirit it is said: 'Renew a right spirit within my bowels' (Ps. 50:12). But who could pass over in silence that dignity of the Holy Spirit? For the ancient prophets cried out: 'Thus says the Lord.' This voice Christ at His coming recalled to His own person, saying: 'But I say to you.' And the new prophets, what do they cry?
157:74
sicut Agabus prophetans in Actibus apostolorum ait: Hæc dicit Spiritus sanctus (Act. XXI, 11). Et iterum se a Deo Patre et a Christo vocatum et missum Paulus apostolus (Gal. I, 1), non ab hominibus neque per hominem, sed per Jesum Christum et Deum Patrem. In Actis vero apostolorum legitur quod a Spiritu sancto segregatus et missus. Sic enim scriptum est: Et dicit Spiritus sanctus, segregate mihi Barnabam et Paulum in opus quo vocavi eos (Act. XIII, 2). Et paulo post: Ipsi autem missi a Spiritu sancto descenderunt Seleuciam (Ibid., 4). 16. Nequis autem Spiritum sanctum quia Paraclitus dicitur e contemptibile quid æstimet; Paraclitus enim advocatus sive consolator est secundum Latinam linguam;
正如亞迦布在使徒行傳中預言說:「聖靈如此說」(徒二十一11)。又使徒保羅乃是蒙父上帝和基督所召所差(加一1),不是由於人,也不是藉著人,乃是藉著耶穌基督與父上帝。但在使徒行傳中卻讀到他是由聖靈所分別、所差遣的。因為經上如此記著:「聖靈說:要為我分派巴拿巴和保羅,去做我召他們所做的工」(徒十三2)。稍後又說:「他們既被聖靈差遣,就下到西流基」(同上4)。但唯恐有人因聖靈被稱為保惠師便輕看他為某種微不足道之物:按拉丁文,保惠師乃是「中保」或「安慰者」的意思;
as Agabus prophesying in the Acts of the Apostles says: 'Thus says the Holy Spirit' (Acts 21:11). And again, the apostle Paul was called and sent by God the Father and by Christ (Gal. 1:1), not by men nor through a man, but through Jesus Christ and God the Father. But in the Acts of the Apostles it is read that he was separated and sent by the Holy Spirit. For thus it is written: 'And the Holy Spirit says, Separate to Me Barnabas and Paul for the work to which I have called them' (Acts 13:2). And a little after: 'They therefore, being sent by the Holy Spirit, went down to Seleucia' (ibid. 4). But lest anyone should esteem the Holy Spirit as something contemptible because He is called the Paraclete: the Paraclete is 'advocate' or 'consoler' according to the Latin tongue;
← 上一段下一段 →
← 第 156 章
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157