📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Sermons & Letters

Pope Leo the Great

Sermons & Letters 66 part 2/2

Latin original · 19 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 66:42–66:60 (60 verses in all)

← ch. 65ch. 67 →
← prev part
66:42
quia Ecclesia catholica hac fide vivit, hac proficit, ut in Domino Jesu Christo, nee sinc vera Divinitate humanitas, nec sine vera humanitate credatur Divinitas. Cum autem in Concilio Eutyches profiteretur ex duabus naturis fuisse Dominum nostrum ante adunationem, post adunationem vero unam naturam confiteretur; miror tam absurdam,tamque perversam ejus professionem nulla judicantium increpationereprebensam; etsermonem nimis insipientem, nimisque. blasphemum, ita omissum, quasi nihil quod offenderet, esset auditum: cum tam impie duarum naturarum ante incarnationem Unigenitus Dei Filius fuisse dicatur, quam nefarie postquam Verbum caro factum est, natura in eo singularis asseritur.
because the catholic Church lives by this faith and advances by this, that in the Lord Jesus Christ neither is the humanity believed without true Divinity, nor the Divinity without true humanity. But when in the Council Eutyches professed that our Lord was of two natures before the union, but after the union confessed one nature; I marvel that so absurd and so perverse a profession of his was rebuked by no reproof of the judges; and that a discourse so exceedingly foolish, so exceedingly blasphemous, was so passed over, as though nothing offensive had been heard: since it is as impious to say that before the incarnation the Only-begotten Son of God was of two natures, as it is nefarious to assert that, after the Word was made flesh, the nature in Him was single.
因為大公教會靠此信德而活,靠此而進步,即在主耶穌基督裡,人性不被信為沒有真神性,神性也不被信為沒有真人性。但當歐迪奇在公會議中宣認我們的主在聯合以前出於兩個本性,而在聯合以後卻承認只有一個本性時;我驚訝於他這如此荒謬、如此乖謬的宣認,竟未受審判者任何斥責;而這如此愚昧、如此褻瀆的言論,竟被如此輕輕放過,彷彿沒有聽見任何觸犯之語:因為說在成肉身以前神的獨生子出於兩個本性,與斷言在道成肉身以後祂裡面只有單一本性,同樣是不敬的。
66:43
Quod non Eutyches idco vel recte vel tolerabiliter aestimet dictum,quia nulla est sententia confutatum. Tunc enim fructuosissime vera fides defenditur, cum etiam a sectatoribus suis opinio falsa damnatur. CAP. IX. — Inter haec ergo quantum Nestorius a veritate deviavittDeitatem Verbi ab assumpti hominis substantia separando, tantum a recto tramite etiam iste discessit, qui unigenitum Dei Filium sic de utero beatae Virginis praedicat natum, ut humani quidem corporis speciem gesserit,sed humanaecarnis veritas Verbo unita non fucrit.Do quo prodigio falsitatis, qui non videat quae opinionum monstra nascantur ?
Let not Eutyches on that account esteem this to have been rightly or tolerably said, because it was refuted by no sentence. For then most fruitfully is the true faith defended, when a false opinion is condemned even by its own followers. CHAPTER IX. — Amid these things therefore, by however much Nestorius deviated from the truth, separating the Deity of the Word from the substance of the assumed man, by so much did this man also depart from the right path, who so preaches the Only-begotten Son of God to be born from the womb of the blessed Virgin, that He bore indeed the appearance of a human body, but the truth of human flesh was not united to the Word. Of which prodigy of falsehood, who does not see what monsters of opinions are born?
歐迪奇不可因這話未被任何裁決所駁,便以為它是正確或尚可容忍地說出的。因為真信德最有果效地得以捍衛,乃是當一種錯謬的意見連被其自身的追隨者也定罪之時。第九章——因此,在這些事中,聶斯多留把道的神性從所取之人的本體分開,離真理有多遠,這人也照樣偏離正道有多遠——他如此宣講神的獨生子由真福童貞女胎中所生,以致祂誠然帶著人身的外貌,但人肉身的真實卻未與道聯合。對於這虛謊的怪異,誰能看不出有何等的意見怪物由此而生?
66:44
Negatur enim mcdiatoris Dei et homi- r.iim, hominis Jesu Christi, necesse cst ut multis impietatibus impleatur,eumqut aut Apollinarissibi vindicet, aut Valentinus usurpet, aut Manichæus obtincat, quorum nullus in Christo Jesu humanæ carnis credidit veritatem. Qua utique non recepta, non solum quod secundum carnem atque animam rationalcm, qui erat in forma Dei, manens idem in forma servi,homo natus denegatur,sed etiam quod crucifixus est, et mortuus, ac sepultus, quodque die tertia a mortuis resurrexit, et quod ad dexteram Pei Patris sedens, ad judicandos vivos et mortuos in eo corpore sit venturus, in quo est judicatus, abnuitur:
For if the man Jesus Christ, the mediator of God and men, is denied, it is necessary that it be filled with many impieties, and that either Apollinaris claim Him for himself, or Valentinus usurp Him, or Manichaeus lay hold of Him, none of whom believed in the truth of human flesh in Christ Jesus. Which not being received, not only is it denied that He who was in the form of God, remaining the same in the form of a servant, was born a man according to flesh and rational soul, but also it is refused that He was crucified, and died, and was buried, and that on the third day He rose from the dead, and that, sitting at the right hand of God the Father, He is to come to judge the living and the dead in that same body in which He was judged:
因為若否認神人之間的中保、人耶穌基督,則勢必充滿許多不敬,以致或是阿波利拿留把祂據為己有,或是華倫提努篡奪祂,或是摩尼奪取祂——這些人中沒有一個相信基督耶穌裡有人肉身的真實。這既不被接受,便不僅否認那在神的形像中、又同樣存留在奴僕形像中者,按著肉身與理性之魂生為人,而且也否認祂被釘十字架、死了、被埋葬,並在第三日從死裡復活,又坐在父神的右邊,將要在那被審判的同一身體裡來審判活人死人:
66:45
quia haecredemptionisnostraesacramenta vacuantur, si Christus veram veri hominis, totamque naturam suscepisse non creditur.An quia manifesta erant signa divina, falsa dicentur documenta corporea?et testimonia utriusque naturae valebunt, ut creator 403 intelligatur, non valebunt ut creatura salvetur? Quod Deitatis est caro non minuit, quod carnis cst Deitas non peremit. Idem enim et sempiternus ex Patre, et temporalis ex matre: in sua virtute inviolabilis, in nostra infirmitate passibilis; in DeitateTrinitatis cum Patre et cum Spiritu sancto unius ejusdemque naturae; in susceptione autem hominis, non unius substantiae, sed unius ejusdemque personae:
because these mysteries of our redemption are made void, if Christ is not believed to have assumed the true and whole nature of true man. Or shall the divine signs, because they were manifest, cause the bodily evidences to be called false? And shall the testimonies of each nature avail that the Creator be understood, but not avail that the creature be saved? What is of the Deity did not diminish the flesh, what is of the flesh the Deity did not destroy. For the same is both everlasting from the Father, and temporal from the Mother: inviolable in His own power, passible in our infirmity; in the Deity of the Trinity, with the Father and with the Holy Spirit, of one and the same nature; but in the assumption of the man, not of one substance, but of one and the same Person:
因為若不信基督取了真人真實而完整的本性,則我們救贖的這些奧秘便歸於徒然。難道那些神聖的記號,因為是顯明的,便要使那屬肉身的憑據被稱為虛假?難道兩個本性的見證,能用以使人認識創造者,卻不能用以使受造者得救?那屬乎神性的並未減損肉身,那屬乎肉身的神性也未毀滅。因為同一位既由父而為永恆,又由母而為屬時:在祂自己的能力中不可侵犯,在我們的軟弱中可受苦;在三位一體的神性中,與父並聖神同為一而同一的本性;但在取用那人時,並非一個本體,乃是一而同一的位格:
66:46
ut idem esset divos in pauperlate, omnipotens in abjectione. impassibilis in supplicio, immortalis in morte. Nec enim Verbum aut in carnem aut in animam aliqua sui parte conversum est,cum simplex et incommutabilis natura Deitatis tota in suasit semper essentia,nec damnum sui recipiens nec augmentum;
so that the same was rich in poverty, omnipotent in abjection, impassible in torment, immortal in death. For neither was the Word converted, in any part of itself, either into flesh or into soul, since the simple and immutable nature of the Deity is whole always in its own essence, receiving neither loss nor increase of itself;
以致同一位在貧窮中富足,在卑賤中全能,在苦刑中不能受苦,在死亡中不死。因為道並未在其自身任何部分被轉化為肉身或魂,既然神性那單純而不變的本性,總是在其自身的本質中全然,既不承受自身的虧損,也不承受增添;
66:47
et sic assumptam naturam beatiticans, ut glorificata in glorificante permaneat.Cur autem inconveniens aut impossibile videatur ut Verbum et caro atque animaunusJesus Cbristus et unus Dei hominisque sit Filius, si caro et anima quæ dissimilium naturarum sunt, unam faciunt etiam sinc Verbi incarnatione personam, cum multo facilius sit ut hanc unitatem sui atque hominis Deitatis praestet potestas, quam uteamin substantiis suis obtineatsolius humanitatis infirmitas? Nec verbum igitur in carnem, nec in Verbum, caro mutata est, sed utrumque in uno manet, at unus in utroque est, non diversitate divisus, nec permixtione confusus.
and so blessing the assumed nature, that the glorified nature abides in the glorifying. But why should it seem unfitting or impossible that the Word and flesh and soul should be one Jesus Christ and one Son of God and of man, if flesh and soul, which are of dissimilar natures, make one Person even without the incarnation of the Word, since it is much easier that the power of the Deity should effect this unity of itself and of man, than that the infirmity of humanity alone should obtain it in its own substances? Neither therefore was the Word changed into flesh, nor the flesh into the Word, but each abides in the one, and one is in each, neither divided by diversity, nor confused by commingling.
祂如此祝福所取的本性,以致那受榮耀的本性存留在那施榮耀者之中。但為何會顯得不合宜或不可能,即道、肉身與魂應是一位耶穌基督,是神與人的一位兒子——倘若肉身與魂,雖屬不同的本性,即使沒有道的成肉身也能構成一個位格,而神性的能力使自己與人的這種合一得以成就,豈不遠比唯獨人性的軟弱在其自身的本體中達成這合一更為容易?因此,道既未被轉化為肉身,肉身也未被轉化為道,乃是二者各存留於那一位中,而一位存於二者中,既不因分歧而分割,也不因摻雜而混亂。
66:48
Nec alter ex Patre, alter ex matre,sed idem aliter ex Patre, ante omne principium, aliter de matre in line sæculorum: ut esset mediator Dei et hominum lio uo Christus Jesus (I Tim. ii, in quo inhabitaret plenitudo Divinitatis corporalitcr (Coloss. n): quia ussumpti non, assumentis provectio est, quod Deus dium exsaUavit, et donavit illi nomen quoa est super omne nomen (Philip. II). CAP. X.
Nor is one from the Father and another from the Mother, but the same in one manner from the Father before all beginning, in another manner from the Mother at the end of the ages: so that He might be the mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus (1 Timothy 2), in whom the fullness of the Divinity dwelt bodily (Colossians 2): because it is the advancement of the assumed, not of the assuming, that God exalted Him, and gave Him a name which is above every name (Philippians 2). CHAPTER X.
祂也不是一位出於父、另一位出於母,乃是同一位:一則在萬始之先出於父,另則在諸世代之末出於母:好使祂作神與人之間的中保,即人基督耶穌(提摩太前書二章),神性的一切豐盛在祂裡面以肉身居住(歌羅西書二章):因為神高舉了祂,又賜給祂那超乎萬名之上的名(腓立比書二章),這乃是那受取者的擢升,而非那施取者的擢升。第十章。
66:49
Nativitas enim Domini secundum carnem, quamvis habeat quaedam propria quibus humanae conditionisinitia transcendat,sive quodsolusab inviolata Virgine sine concupiscentia.carnis est conceptus et natus, sive quod ita e visceribus matris est editus,ut fecunditas pureret et virginitas permaneret, non alterius tamen naturae erat ejus caro (/) nostrae, nec alio illi quam caeteris bominibus anima est inspirata principio, quæ excellerct,non diversitate generis,sed sublimitate virtutis. Nihil enim carni suæ habebat adversum, nec discordia desideriorum gignebat compugnantiam voluntatum.
For the Lord's birth according to the flesh, although it has certain properties by which it transcends the beginnings of the human condition — whether that He alone was conceived and born of an inviolate Virgin without carnal desire, or that He was brought forth from His mother's womb in such a way that fruitfulness gave birth yet virginity remained — nevertheless His flesh was not of another nature than ours, nor was a soul breathed into Him by any other principle than into the rest of men, a soul which excelled not by diversity of kind but by loftiness of virtue. For He had nothing in His flesh opposed to Himself, nor did discord of desires beget a conflict of wills.
因為主按肉體的降生,雖然具有某些特性,藉此超越了人類處境的起始——無論是說唯獨祂是由未受玷污的童貞女所懷孕、所生,而沒有肉體的情慾,或是說祂如此從母腹中被誕生,以致生育得以成就而童貞仍存——然而祂的肉體並非與我們有不同的本性,也不是以與其他人不同的本源將靈魂吹入祂內,這靈魂之卓越,不在於類別的不同,而在於德能的崇高。因為祂在自己的肉體中沒有任何與自身相敵對之物,慾望的不和也不曾產生意志的相爭。
66:50
Sensus corporei vigebant sine lege peccati, et veritas affectionum sub moderamineDeitatis et mentis, nec tentabatur illecebris, nec cedebat 404 injuriis. Verus homo vero unitus est Deo; nec secundum existentem prius animam deductus est e cœlo,noc secundum carnem creatus ex nihilo, eamdem gerens in Verbi Deitate personam, et tenens communem nobiscum in corpore animaque naturam.Non enim esset Dei hominumque mediator,nisi idem Deus idemque homo in utroque ct unus esset et verus. Deinde non Deum tantum dicimus Christum, sicut hæretici Manichaei, nec hominem tantum sicut haeretici Photiniani;
His bodily senses flourished without the law of sin, and the truth of His affections was under the governance of the Godhead and of the mind; He was neither tempted by allurements nor did He yield to injuries. True man was united to true God; He was not brought down from heaven according to a soul existing beforehand, nor created out of nothing according to the flesh, bearing one and the same Person in the Godhead of the Word, and holding a nature common with us in body and soul. For He would not be the Mediator of God and men unless the same One were both God and man, and in each nature both one and true. Furthermore, we do not call Christ God only, as the Manichaean heretics do, nor man only, as the Photinian heretics do;
祂身體的感官運作而無罪的律,祂情感的真實乃在神性與心智的節制之下;祂既不被誘惑所試探,也不向傷害屈服。真人與真神聯合;祂並非按著先前存在的靈魂從天而降,也非按著肉體從無中受造,而是在道的神性中承載著同一位格,並持有與我們在身體和靈魂上共通的本性。因為除非同一位既是神又是人,並在兩性中既為一又為真,否則祂就不能作神與人之間的中保。再者,我們不像摩尼派異端那樣只稱基督為神,也不像弗提諾派異端那樣只稱祂為人;
66:51
nec ita hominem, ut aliquid ei desit quod ad humanam certum est pertinere naturanl, sive unimam, sive mentem rationabilem, sive carnem, quæ uon de femina sumpta sit, sed facta de Verbo, in carnem couverso atque mutato: quæ tria falsa et vana Apollinaristarum haereticorum tres varias protulerunt partes. Nec dicimus quod hcata Virgo Maria hominem sine Deitate conceperit, qui creatus a Spiritu sancto, postea sit susceptus a Verbo, quod Nestorium praedicantem merito justeque damnavimus; sed dicimus Christum Dei Filium,Deum verum,natum de Deo Patre, sine ullo initio temporis, eumdemque hominem verum natum de matre homine, certa plenitudine temporis;
nor do we call Him man in such a way that something is lacking to Him which certainly belongs to human nature — whether a soul, or a rational mind, or flesh which was not taken from a woman but made from the Word converted and changed into flesh: which three false and empty errors the three various sects of the Apollinarist heretics have brought forth. Nor do we say that the blessed Virgin Mary conceived a man without the Godhead, who, created by the Holy Spirit, was afterward taken up by the Word — a doctrine which we have rightly and justly condemned in Nestorius who preached it; but we say that Christ the Son of God, true God, was born of God the Father without any beginning of time, and that the same, true man, was born of a human mother in the fixed fullness of time;
我們也不以這樣的方式稱祂為人,即祂缺少某種確屬人性之物——無論是靈魂、理性的心智,或是肉體,那肉體不是取自女子,而是由轉變並改換成肉體的道所造成的:這三種虛假空洞的謬誤,正是亞波里拿留派異端的三個不同支派所提出的。我們也不說蒙福的童貞女瑪利亞懷了一個沒有神性的人,這人由聖靈所造,後來才被道所接納——這是我們有理有義地在傳講此說的聶斯多留身上所定罪的;反之,我們說神子基督,真神,無任何時間的起始,生於父神,而同一位,真人,在確定的時間滿足之際,生於一位為人的母親;
66:52
nec ejus humanitatem, qua major est Pater, minuere aliquid ei naturæ quæ æqualis estPatri.Hocautemutrumque unus est Christus, qui verissimo dixit et secundum Deum: Ege el Pater unum sumus (Joan. xl; et secundum hominem: Paler major me est (Joan. xix). CAP. XI. — Quamvis ergo in uno Domino nostro Jesu Christo.vero Dei atque hominis Filio, Verbi et carnis una persona sit, et utraque essentia cornmunes habeat artiones, intelligendæ tamen sunt ipsorum operum qualitates, et sinceræ fidei contemplatione cernendum est ad quae provehatur humilitas infirmitatis, et ad quae inclinetur altitudo virtutis: quid sit quodcaro sine Verbo non agit,et quid sit quod Verbum sine carne non efficit.
nor does His humanity, in respect of which the Father is greater, take anything away from that nature which is equal to the Father. Now both of these together are the one Christ, who most truly said, according to His Godhead: 'I and the Father are one' (John 10), and according to His manhood: 'The Father is greater than I' (John 14). Therefore, although in our one Lord Jesus Christ, the true Son of God and of man, there is one Person of the Word and of the flesh, and both essences have common operations, yet the qualities of their several works are to be understood, and by the contemplation of sincere faith it must be discerned to what things the lowliness of weakness is raised, and to what things the loftiness of power is bowed down: what it is that the flesh does not do without the Word, and what it is that the Word does not accomplish without the flesh.
祂的人性(在此方面父為更大)也絲毫不減損那與父同等的本性。然而這兩者合而為一位基督,祂極真實地按其神性說:「我與父原為一」(約翰福音第十章),又按其人性說:「父是比我大的」(約翰福音第十四章)。所以,雖然在我們獨一的主耶穌基督,真神與人之子裡面,道與肉體只有一個位格,且兩種本質有共同的運作,然而各自工作的特性仍當被領悟,並須以真誠信德的默觀來辨明:軟弱的卑微被提升至何等境地,而大能的崇高又俯就至何等境地:何者是肉體離了道所不行的,何者是道離了肉體所不成就的。
66:53
Sine Verbi enim potentia non conciperet virgo nec pareret,et sine,veritate carnis obvuluta paunis infantia non jaceret. Sine Verbi putentia non fieret redintegratio debilium et vivificatio mortuorum,et sine veritate carnis nec cibusjejunio nec somnus esset necessarius fatigato. Postremo sine Verbi potentia nun se Dominus Patri profiteretur aequalem, et sine veritate carnis non idem diceret Patrem esse majorem, cum catholica fides utrumque suscipiat, utrumque defendat, quae secundum proprietatem divinæ humunæque substantiæ unum Dei Filium et hominem credit et Verbum.
For without the power of the Word the Virgin would not conceive nor bring forth, and without the reality of the flesh His infancy would not lie wrapped in swaddling clothes. Without the power of the Word there would be no restoration of the weak and no giving of life to the dead, and without the reality of the flesh food would not be needful for one fasting nor sleep for one wearied. Finally, without the power of the Word the Lord would not profess Himself equal to the Father, and without the reality of the flesh the same One would not say that the Father was greater — since the catholic faith receives both and defends both, which, according to the property of the divine and human substance, believes the one Son of God to be both man and Word.
因為若沒有道的能力,童貞女就不會懷孕,也不會生產;若沒有肉體的真實,祂的嬰孩時期就不會裹著布躺臥。若沒有道的能力,就不會有軟弱者的康復和死人的復甦;若沒有肉體的真實,禁食者就不需要食物,疲乏者也不需要睡眠。最後,若沒有道的能力,主就不會自稱與父同等;若沒有肉體的真實,同一位就不會說父是更大的——因為大公信仰同時接納二者,也同時維護二者,這信仰按著神性與人性本體的特性,相信獨一的神子既是人又是道。
66:54
405 Quamvis ergo ab illo initio,quo in utero virginis Verbum caro factum est (Joan.I),-ihil umquam inter divinam humanamque substantiam divisionis exstiterit, et per omnia incrementa corporea unius personae fuerint totius temporis actiones,ca ipsa tamen quae inseparabiliter facta sunt nulla permixtione confundimus, sed quid cujusque formae sit ex operum qualitate sentimus. Nec divina cnm humanis præjudicant, nec humana divinis: cum ita in idipsum utraque concurrant, ut in eis nec proprietas absumatur, neo persona geminetur.
Therefore, although from that beginning in which the Word was made flesh in the Virgin's womb (John 1) no division ever existed between the divine and human substance, and through all the bodily increases the actions of the whole time were of one Person, yet those very things which were done inseparably we do not confound by any commingling, but we perceive from the quality of the works what belongs to each form. For neither do the divine acts prejudice the human, nor the human the divine: since both concur in one and the same so that in them neither is the property consumed nor the Person doubled.
所以,雖然從道在童貞女胎中成為肉身的那起始(約翰福音第一章)以來,神性與人性的本體之間從未存在任何分割,並且透過身體的一切成長,全部時間的行動都屬於一個位格,然而那些不可分割地被成就之事,我們卻不以任何混合加以混淆,而是從工作的特性辨認出何者屬於各自的形態。因為神性的作為不妨礙人性,人性的作為也不妨礙神性:既然兩者匯合於同一,以致在其中特性不被消融,位格也不被增倍。
66:55
Quamvis ergo unus sit Dominus Jesus Christus,et verae Deitatis veraequehumanitatis in ipso una prorsus eademque persona sit, neque hujus unitionis soliditas ulla possit divisione sejungi;
Therefore, although the Lord Jesus Christ is one, and in Him there is one and altogether the same Person of the true Godhead and the true manhood, and the solidity of this union can be sundered by no division;
所以,雖然主耶穌基督乃是一位,並且在祂裡面,真神性與真人性只有一個且完全相同的位格,這聯合的堅固不能被任何分割所割裂;
66:56
exultationem tamen, quia illum exaltavit Deus, et donavit illi nomen, quotl est super omne nomen, ad eam intelligimus pertinere formam, quae ditandaerat tantæ glorificationis augmento.In forma quippe Dei, aequalis erat Filius Patri, et inter genitorem atque unigenitum nulla erat in essentia discretio, nulla in majestate diversitas, nec per incarnationis mysterium aliquid decesserat Verbo, quod Dei Patris muncre redderetur.Forma autem servi, per quum impassibilis Deitas, sacramentum mgnæ pietatis imnplevit, humana humilitas est,quæ gloria divinæ potestatis evectaest intantam unitatem,ab ipso conceptu virginis Deitateet humanitate connexa, ut nec sine homine divina, nee sine Deo agerentur humana.
yet the exaltation — because God exalted Him and gave Him a name which is above every name — we understand to pertain to that form which was to be enriched by the increase of so great a glorification. For in the form of God the Son was equal to the Father, and between the Begetter and the Only-begotten there was no distinction in essence, no diversity in majesty, nor had anything departed from the Word through the mystery of the Incarnation which needed to be restored by the gift of God the Father. But the form of the servant, through which the impassible Godhead fulfilled the sacrament of great piety, is the human lowliness which was raised by the glory of divine power into so great a unity, being joined in Godhead and manhood from the very conception of the Virgin, that neither were the divine acts done without the man, nor the human without God.
然而那高舉——因為神高舉了祂,賜給祂一個超乎萬名之上的名——我們領會為關乎那形態,就是那要藉如此偉大之榮耀增添而被豐富的形態。因為在神的形態中,子與父同等,在生者與獨生者之間,本質上沒有分別,威嚴上沒有差異,也沒有任何東西藉道成肉身的奧祕從道離去,以致需要藉父神的恩賜來恢復。但那僕人的形態,藉此不能受苦的神性成就了偉大敬虔的聖事,乃是人的卑微,這卑微被神能的榮耀提升至如此偉大的合一,從童貞女受孕之時就在神性與人性中相聯,以致神性的作為不離人而行,人性的作為也不離神而行。
66:57
Propter guod sicut Dominus majestatis dicitur crucifixus,ita qui ex sempiternitate aequalis est Deo, dicitur exaltatus. Nec interest ex qua Christus substantianominctur;cum inseparabiliter.manente unitate personae, idem sit et totus hominis filius propter carnem,et totus Dei Filius propter unam cum Patre Deitatem.Quidquid ergo in tempore accepit Christus, secundum hominem accepit,cui quae non habuit,conferuntur. Nam secundum potentiam Verbi. indifferenter omnia quae habet t'ater, etiam Filius habet: et quae in forma servi a Patre accepit, eadem in forma Patris etiam ipse donavit. CAP. XII.
Wherefore, just as the Lord of majesty is said to be crucified, so He who from eternity is equal to God is said to be exalted. Nor does it matter from which substance Christ is named; since, with the unity of Person remaining inseparably, the same One is both wholly Son of man on account of the flesh, and wholly Son of God on account of the one Godhead with the Father. Whatever therefore Christ received in time, He received according to His manhood, to which are conferred the things which it did not have. For according to the power of the Word, the Son also has indifferently all things which the Father has: and the things which in the form of the servant He received from the Father, the same things in the form of the Father He Himself also gave.
因此,正如威嚴的主被說是被釘十字架,同樣,那從永恆就與神同等的主也被說是被高舉。基督由哪一本體得名並無關緊要;因為位格的合一既不可分割地存留,同一位就因肉體而完全是人子,又因與父同一神性而完全是神子。所以,基督在時間中所領受的一切,祂都是按著人性領受,將祂本所沒有的賜給人性。因為按著道的能力,子也毫無差別地擁有父所擁有的一切:祂在僕人形態中從父所領受的,同樣的事,祂自己也在父的形態中賜下。
66:58
— (I) Eam fidem,cum plurimi haereticorum impugnarent, Nestorius, et Eutyches, diversa quidem assertione, sea simili impietate conati sunt irrumpere. Anathematizetur ergo Nestorius, qui beatam Virginem 466 hominis tantummodo credidit genitricem, ut aham personam carnis, aliam faceret Deitatis:cum ita intra virginea viscera Verbum caro sit factum,ut per in< ffabiJe sacramentum uno conceptu unoque partu secundum veritatematque unionem utriusque naturæ, eadem virgo et ancilla Domini esset,et mater.
That faith, when very many of the heretics assailed it, Nestorius and Eutyches attempted to break in upon — with different assertion indeed, but with like impiety. Let Nestorius therefore be anathematized, who believed the blessed Virgin to be the mother of a man only, so that he made one Person of the flesh and another of the Godhead: whereas the Word was so made flesh within the virginal womb that, through an unspeakable sacrament, in one conception and one birth, according to the truth and union of both natures, the same Virgin was both the handmaid of the Lord and His mother.
當眾多異端攻擊那信仰時,聶斯多留與歐迪奇試圖闖入——固然以不同的主張,卻以同樣的不虔。所以,願聶斯多留被咒詛,他相信蒙福的童貞女只是一個人的母親,以致他分立肉體的位格與神性的位格為二:然而道在童貞女胎中如此成為肉身,以致藉著不可言喻的聖事,在一次受孕與一次生產中,按著兩性的真實與聯合,同一位童貞女既是主的婢女,又是祂的母親。
66:59
Percellatur quoque Eutyches eodem anathemate, qui nogata humanae carnis utque animae veritate, totum Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum unius asseruit esse naturæ, tamquam Verbi Deitas ipse sein carnem animamque converterit. Quae mendacia tam sacrilega, per totum mundum,sanctorum Patrum damnatasuntsententiis.Fides autem catholica singularis atque vera, justificans impium,et creans justum,ad humanitatis suae tracta participem,in illo acquirit salutem in quo solo homo invenerit innocentem.
Let Eutyches also be smitten with the same anathema, who, denying the truth of human flesh and soul, asserted that our whole Lord Jesus Christ was of one nature, as though the Godhead of the Word had itself converted itself into flesh and soul. Such sacrilegious falsehoods have been condemned throughout the whole world by the sentences of the holy Fathers. But the catholic faith, singular and true, justifying the ungodly and creating the just, drawing men to participation in its own humanity, acquires salvation in Him in whom alone man has found One innocent.
願歐迪奇也遭受同樣的咒詛,他否認人的肉體與靈魂的真實,斷言我們全然的主耶穌基督只有一個本性,彷彿道的神性把自己轉變成了肉體與靈魂。這樣褻瀆的謬誤,已在全世界被眾聖教父的裁決所定罪。但那獨一而真實的大公信仰,稱不虔者為義,造就義人,將人吸引至分享它自身的人性,在祂裡面獲得救恩——唯獨在祂裡面,人才尋見了一位無罪者。
66:60
Eam fidem secundum propheticam, evangelicam, apostolicam,et salutans symboli doctrinam.Nicæna Synodus instituit, examen Chalcedonense confirmavit, orbis terrarum celebrat atque veneratur.Eamdem,dilectissimi,pio et laudabili amore defendite, immo fideliter firmiterque retinete, ac constanter asserite. Quo.. niam. sicut ait B. apostolus Paulus, magnum cst pietatis sacramentum,quod manifestatum cst in carne. justificatum est in spiritu, apparuil angelis, prædicatum est gentibus, creditum est in hoc mundo, assumptumest in gloria (I Tim. 111, I6).
That faith, according to the prophetic, evangelical, and apostolic teaching, and the saving doctrine of the Creed, the Council of Nicaea established, the examination of Chalcedon confirmed, and the whole world celebrates and venerates. Defend this same faith, most beloved, with a pious and praiseworthy love; nay, hold it faithfully and firmly, and steadfastly assert it. For, as the blessed Apostle Paul says, great is the sacrament of piety, which was manifested in the flesh, justified in the spirit, appeared to angels, was preached to the nations, was believed in this world, was taken up in glory (1 Timothy 3:16).
那信仰,按著先知、福音書與使徒的教訓,以及信經拯救的教義,尼西亞會議所確立,迦克墩的審查所確認,普世所慶祝並敬奉。至愛的弟兄,願你們以虔敬而可讚的愛心維護這同一信仰;不但如此,更要忠信而堅定地持守它,並恆切地宣認它。因為,正如蒙福的使徒保羅所說,敬虔的奧祕實在偉大,這奧祕在肉身顯現,在聖靈中稱義,被天使看見,向萬國傳揚,在世上被信,在榮耀中被接去(提摩太前書三章16節)。
← prev part
← ch. 65ch. 67 →
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255