📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Sermons

Maximus of Turin

Sermons 103

Latin original · 10 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss

← ch. 102ch. 104 →
103:1
365 Ex probatissimis documentis ostensum est superiorem homiliam nemini, nisi S. Maximo Taurinensi esse attribuendam. Cum autem hæc evidenter ad illam referatur, mentionemque de ipsa faciat, satis evincitur ab eodem fuisse excogitatam, scriptoque traditam. Omnem deinde auferunt hæsitationem duo codices supra memorati 8. Crucis in Jer., in quibus enuntiatur sub titulo: Sequentia de grano sinapis, et codex Sangallensis, Maximum auctorem indicantes. Admonemus tamen partem sermonis hujus monachos 8. Mauri in appendicem serm. S. August. i class. num. 88 retulisse; ubi docuerunt inter vulgatos 6. Ambrosii editam fuisse, quam consultibus ab albo S. doctoris expunxere. Nam, præter duos codd. S.
From the most approved documents it has been shown that the preceding homily is to be attributed to no one but St. Maximus of Turin. But since this one evidently refers to that one and makes mention of it, it is sufficiently proved to have been devised by the same man and handed down in writing. Then the two manuscripts of Santa Croce in Gerusalemme mentioned above take away all hesitation, in which it is announced under the title 'What follows, on the Grain of Mustard,' and the Sankt Gallen codex, indicating Maximus as author. We advise, however, that the monks of St. Maur placed part of this sermon in the appendix of the sermons of St. Augustine, first class, number 88; where they taught that it had been published among the printed works of Ambrose, which by common counsel they struck from the roll of the holy doctor. For, besides the two manuscripts of Santa
從最受認可的文獻已經證明,前一篇講道除了都靈的聖瑪西模之外,不當歸於任何人。但既然這一篇明顯地指涉那一篇並提及它,就足以證明它是出於同一人所構思,並以文字傳下。再者,上文提及的耶路撒冷聖十字的兩部抄本消除了一切疑慮,其中以「續論芥菜種」為題宣明此事,加上聖加倫抄本,也指明瑪西模為作者。然而我們要提醒:聖毛爾的修士們將這篇講道的一部分置於聖奧古斯丁講道集附錄第一類第八十八號;在那裡他們指出,它曾刊於安波羅修的印本著作中,而他們憑公議將之從這位聖博士的名錄中剔除。因為,除了聖十字的兩部抄本之外,
103:2
Crucis in JerusaJelu, etiam cod. Vatic. 6451 Maximo suffragatur. Exstat etiam in cod. Urbevetan. pag. 169, in quo præmissis verbis: Unde supra incipit: Cui simile est regnum cœlorum et cui illud æstimabo, ait Dominus; ita etiam inchoatur in cod. Vallicell. A 9. Superiore dominica parabolam Domini disserentes, in qua ait: Cui simile eat regnum cælorum, et cui iimile illud æstimabo ? Simile est grano sinapis, etc., multa i perstrinximus quibus probaremus regnum Dei grano sinapis non immerito cornparari, et distantiam in sola esse existimatione verborum, non in j collatione virtutum. Siquidem fides Christiana regnum Dei est k eumdem vigorem obtinet quem sinapis natura depromit.
Croce in Gerusalemme, the Vatican codex 6451 also supports Maximus. It exists also in the Orvietan codex, page 169, in which, with these words prefixed: 'As above, it begins: To what is the kingdom of heaven like, and to what shall I estimate it? says the Lord'; and so it is likewise begun in the Vallicellian codex A 9. 'Last Sunday, discoursing on the Lord's parable in which he says, To what is the kingdom of heaven like, and to what shall I estimate it? It is like a grain of mustard, etc., we touched on many things by which we might prove that the kingdom of God is not undeservedly compared to a grain of mustard, and that the distance lies only in the estimation of words, not in the comparison of powers. For Christian faith is the kingdom of God; it obtains the same vigor which the nature of mustard puts forth.'
梵蒂岡抄本六四五一號也支持瑪西模。它也存於奧爾維耶托抄本第一六九頁,其中冠以這些話:「如上文,開始如下:主說,天國好比甚麼?我拿甚麼來估量它呢?」;瓦利切拉諾抄本A9號也是如此開始。「上主日,我們講論主的比喻,其中祂說:天國好比甚麼?我拿甚麼來估量它呢?好比一粒芥菜種,等等;我們約略談了許多,藉以證明神的國被比作一粒芥菜種並非不當,且其差距只在於言語的估量,不在於能力的比較。因為基督信仰就是神的國;它擁有芥子本性所發出的同樣力量。」
103:3
Nam sicut, cum sinapis succum sumimus, ad lacrymas cogimur, vultu contristamur, fronte contrahimur et movemur, et ipsam salubritatem corporis nostri cum quodam, fletu austeritatis accipimns. Illinc enim nos amaritudo exasperat, acrimonia penetrat, hinc calor ignei saporis 1 accendit, et toto perturbati corpore tum magis sani efficimur, cum amplius deploramus. Ita ergo et cum fidei Christiane mandata percipimus, contristamur animo, affligimur corpore, ad lacrymas m promovemur, et ipsam nostram salutem cum quodam fletu ac mœrore consequimur. Inde n etiam jejunta nos exasperant, illinc peccatorum conscientia macerat, hinc patrino.
For just as, when we take the juice of mustard, we are driven to tears, saddened in countenance, wrinkled in brow and moved, and we receive the very healthfulness of our body with a certain weeping of austerity. For thence bitterness exasperates us, pungency penetrates, hence the heat of the fiery savor kindles, and, disturbed in the whole body, we are made more healthy the more we lament. So too, when we receive the commands of the Christian faith, we are saddened in mind, afflicted in body, moved to tears, and we obtain our very salvation with a certain weeping and grief. Thence also fasts exasperate us, thence the conscience of sins wears us down, hence the loss of patrimony
因為正如我們服下芥子汁液時,被逼流淚,面容憂愁,額頭皺起、受動,我們是帶著某種嚴苛的哭泣領受我們身體的健康。因為一方面苦味激惱我們,辛辣穿透,另一方面火辣滋味的熱力點燃,全身被攪動,我們越是哀哭,就越發健康。照樣,當我們領受基督信仰的命令時,我們心裡憂愁,身體受苦,被逼流淚,並帶著某種哭泣與哀傷得著我們的救恩。因此,一方面禁食激惱我們,另一方面罪的良心磨損我們,再一方面家業的喪失
103:4
nii Jactura conturbat, et toto contristati 366 habita magis salutem consequimur, si amplius defleamus, secundum quod ait Dominus: Vos plorabitis et plangetis, sæculum autem gaudebit (Joan. XVI). Sicut autem cum sinapi caput forte curandum eat, jubemur abrasos capillos demere, impedimenta cutis universa deponere, ut nudo corpori perfectius medicina proveniat; ita et cum anima per iidem curanda est, praecipimur substantiam a nobis sæculi auferre, impedimenta auri argentique deponere, ut 0 nudæ et soli ANIMæ congruentrus spiritualis medicina P proveniat. Quisquis enimrebus mundi et divitiis sæculi obvulutus est, huic fidei medicina non proderit.
disturbs us, and, saddened in our whole being, we the more obtain salvation if we weep the more, according to what the Lord says: 'You shall weep and lament, but the world shall rejoice' (John 16). But just as, when the head is perhaps to be cured with mustard, we are ordered to shave off the hair, to lay aside all the impediments of the skin, so that medicine may come more perfectly to the bare body; so too, when the soul is to be cured through faith, we are commanded to take away from ourselves the substance of the world, to lay aside the impediments of gold and silver, so that spiritual medicine may come more fittingly to the bare and lone soul. For whoever is entangled in the things of the world and the riches of the age—to him the medicine of faith will not profit.
攪擾我們,全人憂愁,我們若越是哀哭,就越發得著救恩,正如主所說:「你們將要痛哭、哀號,世人倒要喜樂」(約翰福音十六章)。但正如當頭部或許要用芥子醫治時,我們被吩咐剃去頭髮,除掉皮膚一切的障礙,好使藥物更完全地達到裸露的身體;照樣,當靈魂要藉信心得醫治時,我們被命令從自己身上除去世界的財物,放下金銀的障礙,好使屬靈的藥物更合宜地達到那裸露而孤單的靈魂。因為凡糾纏於世上之物、貪戀今世財富的人——信心的藥物於他毫無益處。
103:5
Ergo quod succus sinapis in corpore, hoc fides Christiana agatur in anima. Sed quoniam in eadem dominica sententia scriptum est b assimilari regnum cœlorum grano sinapis, quod acceptum homo misit in hortum suum, et crevit, et facta est arbor, et volucres requieverunt in ramis cjus, r diligentius inquiramus quis iste sit cui hæc cuncta conveniant. Diximus superius SS. martyribus, qui a diversis attriti sunt passionibus, naturam sinapis posse congruere.
Therefore, what the juice of mustard is in the body, let Christian faith be enacted in the soul. But since in the same Sunday's saying it is written that the kingdom of heaven is likened to a grain of mustard, which a man took and cast into his garden, and it grew, and became a tree, and the birds rested in its branches, let us inquire more diligently who this is to whom all these things may fit. We said above that the nature of mustard can fit the holy martyrs, who were worn down by various sufferings.
所以,芥子汁液在身體中是甚麼,願基督信仰在靈魂中也照樣施行。但既然在同一主日的經文中寫著,天國被比作一粒芥菜種,有人拿去種在自己園裡,長起來成了樹,飛鳥宿在它的枝上,就讓我們更加勤懇地查考,這一切所適合的究竟是誰。我們在上文說過,芥子的本性能適合那些被各樣苦難所碾磨的聖殉道者。
103:6
Sed quoniam dicit Scriptura, et crevit, et facta est arbor, et volucres requieverunt in ramis ejus, arbitror hoc ipsi Christo Domino rectius comparari, qui nascendo in hominem humiliatns ut granum est, ascendendo ad cœlum exaltatus ut arbor est. Granum plane Christus est dum patitur, arbor est cum resurgit. Granum inquam est, cum famem esuriens A sustinet. Arbor est cum 367 quinque panibus saturat quinque millia virorum. Ibi sterilitatem humana conditione patitur, hic satietatem propria divinitate largitur. Granum autem b dixerim Dominum, cum cæditur, contemnitur, increpalur; e arborem autem cum cæcos illuminat, mortuos resuscitat, peccata condonat.
But since Scripture says, 'and it grew, and became a tree, and the birds rested in its branches,' I judge that this is more rightly compared to Christ the Lord himself, who, being humbled by his birth into man, is like a grain, but, exalted by his ascension to heaven, is like a tree. Clearly Christ is a grain while he suffers, and a tree when he rises again. He is a grain, I say, when, hungering, he endures famine; he is a tree when with five loaves he satisfies five thousand men. There he suffers barrenness by the human condition; here he bestows abundance by his own divinity. But I would call the Lord a grain when he is struck, despised, rebuked; and a tree when he enlightens the blind, raises the dead, forgives sins.
但既然聖經說:「長起來成了樹,飛鳥宿在它的枝上」,我判定這更恰當地是比作主基督自己:祂因降生為人而被降卑,就如一粒種子;祂因升到天上而被高舉,就如一棵樹。基督受苦時顯然是一粒種子,復活時就是一棵樹。我說,祂饑餓忍受飢荒時是一粒種子;祂用五個餅使五千人吃飽時是一棵樹。在那裡祂按人的境況承受貧乏;在這裡祂憑自己的神性賜下豐盛。但當祂被擊打、被藐視、被斥責時,我要稱主為一粒種子;當祂使瞎眼的看見、使死人復活、赦免罪過時,就稱祂為一棵樹。
103:7
Quod autem granum sit, ipse dicens in Evaogelio ait: Nisi granum tritici cadent in terram mortuum fuerit, d isum solum manet (Joan. II). Hujus igitur grani, hoc est Domini Salvatoris, veluti sinapis acrimoniam atque amaritudinem Judæi minime sustinentes, contempserunt succum coelestis disciplinæ accipere, dicentes illuminato illi cæco: Tu sis discipulus ejus; nos autem Moysi disipuli sumus (Ibid. IX). Ipsi quoque Moysi mandata penitus ignorantes, qui præcepit illis hanc amaritudinem comedendam: cum Paschae illis celebrandae sacramenta disponeret, ait: ManducabiIi, illud cum amaritudine; Pascha enim Domini est (Exod. XII).
That he is a grain, he himself says in the Gospel: 'Unless the grain of wheat falling into the ground die, it remains alone' (John 12). The Jews, then, not at all enduring the pungency and bitterness, as it were of mustard, of this grain—that is, of the Lord the Savior—scorned to receive the juice of heavenly discipline, saying to the man born blind whom he had enlightened: 'Be thou his disciple; but we are disciples of Moses' (John 9). They too were utterly ignorant of the commands of Moses himself, who enjoined upon them this bitterness to be eaten: when he was arranging the sacraments of the Passover to be celebrated by them, he said, 'You shall eat it with bitterness; for it is the Lord's Passover' (Exodus 12).
祂是一粒種子,這是祂自己在福音中所說:「一粒麥子若不落在地裡死了,就仍舊是一粒」(約翰福音十二章)。猶太人絲毫不能忍受這粒種子——就是主救主——那如同芥子般的辛辣與苦味,便不屑領受天上訓誨的汁液,對那被祂開了眼的生來瞎眼之人說:「你去作祂的門徒罷;至於我們,是摩西的門徒」(約翰福音九章)。他們甚至全然無知於摩西自己的誡命,摩西曾吩咐他們要吃這苦味:當他為他們安排要守的逾越節聖禮時說:「你們要帶著苦味吃它;因為這是耶和華的逾越節」(出埃及記十二章)。
103:8
Non enim (sicut illi putant) jussit herbarum vilium acerrimos succos cum assis agni carnibus manducari, sed mandatorum Christi utiliter amaros sermones praecepit cum ipso sacramento passionis dominicae devorari. Nonneenim amari videntur sermones Domini cum dicit: Si vit perfectu. esse, relinque omnia tua, et veni, sequere me (Matth. XIX) ? Et cum dicit non habendas duas tunicas, neque peram, neque calceamenta, 368 amaritudo ista sermonum medicina est animarum. Quod autem ait Evangelium: Quod acceptum homo miti, in hortum suum (Matth. x); quem esse hominem hunc putamos, qui acceptum granum velut sinapis granum in suo hortulo seminavit Ego illum esse arbitror de quo evangelista refert:
For he did not (as they suppose) command the most bitter juices of vile herbs to be eaten with the flesh of the roasted lamb, but he enjoined that the profitably bitter words of Christ's commands be devoured together with the very sacrament of the Lord's passion. For do not the words of the Lord seem bitter when he says: 'If you would be perfect, leave all that is yours, and come, follow me' (Matthew 19)? And when he says that two tunics are not to be had, nor a wallet, nor sandals—this bitterness of words is the medicine of souls. But as to what the Gospel says: 'which a man took and cast into his garden' (Matthew 13); whom do we suppose this man to be, who sowed the grain he had received, like a grain of mustard, in his little garden? I judge him to be the one of whom the evangelist relates:
因為祂並非(如他們所想)吩咐要把卑賤野菜最苦的汁液與烤羊的肉同吃,而是吩咐要把基督誡命那有益的苦澀言語與主受難的聖禮本身一同吞下。因為當主說:「你若願意作完全人,就撇下你一切所有的,來跟從我」(馬太福音十九章),祂的話豈不顯得苦嗎?當祂說不可帶兩件衣裳、不可帶口袋、不可帶鞋——這言語的苦味乃是靈魂的良藥。至於福音所說:「有人拿去種在自己園裡」(馬太福音十三章);我們當認這人是誰,就是那把所領受的種子,如同芥菜種,種在自己小園中的人?我判定他就是福音書所記述的那位:
103:9
Ecce autem Joseph, qui erat decurio ab Arimathea, accessit ad Pilatum, petent ut depositum corpus Domini sepeliret (Luc. XXIII): quod acceptum tradidit sepulturæ, quae in horto fuerat praeparata, atque ideo ait Scriptura: Quod acceptum homo misit in hortum suum. Ergo Joseph hortus culorum erat diversis Ooribus plenus, sed necdum in eo tale germen inseverat. Fragrabat quidem f spccialis animæ ejus hortus varia suavitate virtutum, sed nec dum Christum cum aromatibns in cordis sui secreto posuerat. Ita dum Salvatorem in hortuli sui sepelit monumento, magis illum in animæ suæ intimis collocavit.
'But behold, Joseph, who was a councillor from Arimathea, came to Pilate, asking that he might bury the Lord's body taken down' (Luke 23); which having received, he handed over for burial in the tomb that had been prepared in a garden, and therefore Scripture says: 'which a man took and cast into his garden.' Therefore Joseph was a garden of the heavens, full of various flowers, but had not yet grafted such a seed into it. His special soul's garden was indeed fragrant with the varied sweetness of virtues, but he had not yet placed Christ with the spices in the secret of his heart. So while he buries the Savior in the monument of his little garden, he rather set him within the inmost parts of his soul.
「有一個人名叫約瑟,是亞利馬太的議士,他來見彼拉多,求領取被取下的主的身體去安葬」(路加福音二十三章);他領了之後,就交去葬在園中所預備的墳墓裡,所以聖經說:「有人拿去種在自己園裡。」因此約瑟是天上的園子,滿了各樣的花,卻還未將這樣的種子接種於其中。他靈魂特有的園子確實散發著諸美德多樣的甘甜,但他還未將基督連同香料安置在他內心的隱祕處。這樣,當他把救主葬在自己小園的墳墓中時,他反倒將祂安置在自己靈魂的最深處。
103:10
g Ramos autem hujus arboris si requiris, in'venies, quia ramns est Petrus, ramus est Paulus, rami sunt omnes apostoli vel martyres h, ad quos, si quis se fortiter tenere voluerit, fluctibus sæculi minime submergetur; quin potius sub umbra iIlorum latitans gehennae non patietur ardorem, securus a diabolicae tempestatis procella, i et de judicii exurentis incendio.
But if you seek the branches of this tree, you will find that Peter is a branch, Paul is a branch, all the apostles and martyrs are branches; and if anyone will hold fast to them, he will by no means be submerged by the waves of the age; but rather, hiding beneath their shade, he will not suffer the burning of Gehenna, being safe from the storm of the diabolical tempest, and from the fire of the burning judgment.
但你若尋求這樹的枝子,就必發現:伯多祿是一枝,保羅是一枝,眾使徒與眾殉道者都是枝子;凡人若肯緊緊持守他們,就絕不會被今世的波濤所淹沒;反倒藏身在他們的蔭下,必不遭受地獄的焚燒,得以安然脫離魔鬼風暴的狂飆,並脫離那焚燒審判的火。
← ch. 102ch. 104 →
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284