📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Sermons

Maximus of Turin

Sermons 43

Latin original · 10 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss

← ch. 42ch. 44 →
43:1
147 Hujus homiliæ tanta est cum superiore colligatio, ut harum unius cognito, utriusque qui fuerit auctor cognoscatur. At de auctore magna in codicibus manuscriptis varietas, interque scriptores defensio, cum in codice Vaticano 1268, S. Ambrosio; in altero autem item Vaticano codic, qui es! ninII. 6452, atque in Florentino Sanctæ Crucis Minor., nunc Laurentiano IV, Plut. XXXIII, sancto Joanni Constantinopolitano episcopo accepta [forte ascripta] referatur. Deest auctoris nomen in cod. Vatic. 4951, ut etiam in Ubervetano. Extant etiam fortasse aliqui in quibus sancto Augustino ascripta legatur.
So great is the connection of this homily with the preceding one that, when the author of one of them is known, the author of both is known. But concerning the author there is great variety in the manuscript codices, and dispute among the writers, since in the Vatican codex 1268 it is referred to Saint Ambrose; but in another codex, likewise Vatican, which is number 6452, and in the Florentine of the Holy Cross Minor, now Laurentianus IV, Plut. XXXIII, it is received [perhaps ascribed] to Saint John, bishop of Constantinople. The author's name is lacking in the codex Vaticanus 4951, as also in the Urbevetanus. There exist also perhaps some in which it is read as ascribed to Saint Augustine.
這篇講道與前一篇的關聯如此之大,以致當其中一篇的作者被知曉時,兩篇的作者便都被知曉。但關於作者,在手抄本中有極大的分歧,作家之間也有爭議,因為在梵蒂岡抄本1268中,它被歸於聖安博;但在另一部同樣是梵蒂岡的抄本——即編號6452——以及在小聖十字的佛羅倫斯抄本(現為勞倫斯抄本IV,Plut. XXXIII)中,它被歸於君士坦丁堡主教聖若望名下〔或許是被歸屬的〕。在梵蒂岡抄本4951中,如同在烏爾貝維塔諾抄本中一樣,缺少作者的名字。或許也存在一些抄本,其中它被讀作歸於聖奧斯定。
43:2
Non enim eam editores aliquot sancto eidem Augustino attribuissent, ut re ipsa attribuunt, nisi hujus nomen esse in uno saltem aliquo codice præferretur. Sed dubitationem tollunt Gennadius vetus auctor imprimis ac diligens, cumque Gennadio codices 99 Sanctæ Crucis in Jerusalem, Taurinensis, Laurentianus x, Plut. XIV, et Sangallensis. Itaque monachi Benedictini congregat. Sancti Mauri in appendice serm. sancti Augustini, serm. 80, pag. 102, edit. Antuerp. an. 4700. Jam pridem, inquiunt, auctori suo restitutus, Maximo episcopo Taurinensi, cujus nomen gerit in scriptis et excusis libris. De titulo non laboro.
For certain editors would not have attributed it to the same holy Augustine, as in fact they do attribute it, unless his name were set forth in at least some one manuscript. But Gennadius, an ancient and above all a careful author, removes the doubt; and together with Gennadius the manuscripts of Santa Croce in Jerusalem, the Turin, the Laurentian (Plut. XIV), and the St Gall codex. And so the Benedictine monks of the Congregation of St Maur, in the appendix to the sermons of St Augustine (sermon 80, page 102, Antwerp edition of the year 1700), say: 'Long since it was restored to its own author, Maximus, bishop of Turin, whose name it bears in the writings and in the printed books.' About the title I do not trouble myself.
因為若非至少在某一部抄本中標舉了他的名字,某些編者便不會把它歸給同一位聖奧古斯丁,正如他們事實上所歸屬的那樣。但那位古老、且尤其審慎的作者根納狄烏斯(Gennadius)消除了這疑慮;與根納狄烏斯一同的,還有耶路撒冷聖十字堂的抄本、都靈抄本、勞倫斯圖書館抄本(第十四櫃)以及聖加侖抄本。因此聖毛爾會眾的本篤會修士們,在聖奧古斯丁講道集附錄(第八十篇講道,第一〇二頁,一七〇〇年安特衛普版)中說:「早已將它歸還其本來的作者、都靈主教瑪西穆斯(Maximus);在手稿與印本中它都冠著他的名。」至於標題,我並不費心。
43:3
Eo sum usus quo Gymnicus, editoresque cæteri usi sunt, etsi non sum nescius in Monachis ipsius congregationis Sancti Mauri sic eamdem homiliam esse inscriptam: In Matth. cap. XXXIII, de Juda proditore, et de agro in perigrinorum sepulturam comparato ex pretio venditionis Christi. Retinet h dilectio vestra nos hoc proxima Dominica praedicasse, quod Judas Scarioth, propria sententia condemnatus ad Pharisæos dominici mercedem sanguinis reportavit, et actus poenitentia refudent venditionis pretium laqueo se suspendit; ut qui se mullaverit pecunia, multaret et vita. Intelligens enim quantum scetus admiserit, non suffecit ei sacrilegii carere mercede, nisi careret et salute;
I have used the same title that Gymnicus and the other editors used, although I am not unaware that among the monks of that same Congregation of St Maur this homily is thus entitled: 'On Matthew chapter XXVII, concerning Judas the betrayer, and concerning the field purchased for the burial of strangers out of the price of the sale of Christ.' Your beloved charity retains that we preached this on the last Lord's Day: that Judas Iscariot, condemned by his own verdict before the Pharisees, brought back the wages of the Lord's blood, and, driven by remorse, poured out again the price of the sale and hanged himself in a noose; so that he who had fined himself in money should be fined also in life. For understanding how great a crime he had committed, it did not suffice him to lack the wages of his sacrilege unless he lacked also his salvation;
我採用了金尼庫斯(Gymnicus)與其他編者所用的同一標題,儘管我並非不知道,在聖毛爾同一會眾的修士中,這篇講道被題作:「論馬太福音第二十七章,關於背叛者猶大,以及以出賣基督之價所購、用以埋葬旅客的那塊田地。」你們的親愛之情記得,我們上主日曾如此宣講:猶大依斯加略被自己的判決所定罪,在法利賽人面前把主的血價帶了回來;他被悔恨所驅使,重新傾出出賣所得之價,並用繩索上吊自縊;使那以金錢懲罰自己的人,也以性命受罰。因為他明白自己所犯的罪何等深重,僅僅失去褻聖之所得對他還不夠,除非連救恩也一併失去;
43:4
a dignum enim se morte judicavit, quod Christum vitam b omnium tradidisset c. Severissimus igitur sui judex Judas vel in ulciscendo confitetur, quem negaverat in tradendo. Restituit ergo pecuniam Pharisaeis; sed nec Pharisæi eam libenter accipiunt; dicunt enim d inhibitum sibi esse in suis eam habere thesauris. e Videte igitur, quanta vis dominicae sit pecuniæ, i quam inde Judas rejicit; hinc Pharisæi in locutos non recludunt: justi enim sanguinis 148 pretium pertimescit iniquitas possidere. Consilium tamen ineunt Pharisæi ut ex ea ager figuli comparetur, in quo peregrinorum corpora collocentur.
for he judged himself worthy of death, in that he had betrayed Christ, the life of all. Judas therefore, a most severe judge of himself, even in taking vengeance confesses the one whom he had denied in betraying. He restored the money then to the Pharisees; but not even the Pharisees willingly accept it, for they say it is forbidden them to keep it in their treasuries. See therefore how great is the power of the Lord's money, which Judas casts from him and the Pharisees will not lay up in store: for iniquity dreads to possess the price of righteous blood. Yet the Pharisees take counsel that a potter's field be bought with it, in which the bodies of strangers might be laid.
因為他判定自己該死,因他出賣了眾人的生命——基督。所以猶大這位對自己極其嚴厲的審判者,甚至在復仇之際,也承認了他在背叛之時所否認的那一位。於是他把銀錢還給法利賽人;但連法利賽人也不願甘心收下,因為他們說,把它存在自己的庫房裡是被禁止的。所以你們要看,主的這筆銀錢有何等大的能力:猶大從自己身上把它拋開,法利賽人也不肯把它收藏——因為不義畏懼擁有義人之血的價錢。然而法利賽人商議,要用這錢買一塊窯戶的田,好埋葬旅客的屍體。
43:5
Quod quidem providentia x factum puto, ut pretium Satvatoris non peccatoribus sumptum præbeat, sed perigrinis requiem subministret; non sacrilegis sit ad h lusum, sed defunctis sit ad sepulcrum; ut jam exinde Christus i et vivos sanguinis sui passione redimat. et mortuos pretiosa passione suscipiat. Pretio ergo i Domini sanguinis ager liguli comparatur. Lclimus in Scripturis, quod totius generis humani salus redempta sit sanguine Salvatoris, sicut ait apostolus Petrus: k Non enim redempli estis corruptibilibus auro, vel argento, sed pretioso sanguine agni incontaminati, ei immaculati Jesu Christi (I Petr. I). Igitur, si pretium vitas nostrae sanguis est Domini;
This indeed I think was done by providence, that the price of the Saviour should not furnish an expense for sinners, but should minister rest to strangers; that it should not serve the sacrilegious for their sport, but serve the dead for a tomb; so that from thenceforth Christ might both redeem the living by the passion of His blood, and receive the dead by His precious passion. With the price then of the Lord's blood a potter's field is bought. We read in the Scriptures that the salvation of the whole human race was redeemed by the blood of the Saviour, as the apostle Peter says: 'For you were not redeemed with corruptible gold or silver, but with the precious blood of the unspotted and immaculate Lamb, Jesus Christ' (1 Peter 1). Therefore, if the price of our life is the blood of the Lord;
我以為這確是出於天意的安排:救主的價錢不該供罪人揮霍,卻該賜旅客安息;不該任褻聖者拿去玩弄,卻該給亡者作墳墓;使從此以後,基督既以祂血的苦難救贖活人,也以祂寶貴的苦難收納死者。所以,用主血的價錢買下了一塊窯戶的田。我們在聖經中讀到,全人類的救恩乃是藉救主的寶血所贖,正如使徒彼得所說:「你們得贖,不是憑著能壞的金銀,乃是憑著羔羊——就是無瑕疵、無玷污的耶穌基督——的寶血」(彼前一章)。因此,倘若我們生命的價錢乃是主的血;
43:6
1 vide ergo, quia illa non tam redempta sit agri terrena fragilitas, quam totius mundi incolumitas sempiterna: ait enim Evangelista: Non enim venit Christus ut judicet mundum, sed ut salvetur mundus per ipsum (Joan. XIII). m Vide, inquam ne pecunia illa non tam comparatio sit agri parva portio, quam 149 totius mundi copiosa possessio, sicut ait David propheta: Postula a me, et dabo tibi gentes hæreditatem tuam, et possessionem tuam terminos terræ (Psal. III). Ager ergo iste mundus hic totus est, in quo nos dispersi, et disseminati Domini fructum boni operis germinamus. Sed fortasse perquiras a me, si ager mundus est, quinam sit figulus, qui mundi possit habere dominatum ?
see then that what was redeemed is not so much the earthly frailty of a field as the everlasting safety of the whole world: for the Evangelist says, 'Christ came not that He might judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him' (John 3). See, I say, that that money is not so much a small purchase of a field as an abundant possession of the whole world, as David the prophet says: 'Ask of me, and I will give thee the nations for thy inheritance, and the ends of the earth for thy possession' (Psalm 2). This field then is this whole world, in which we, scattered and sown abroad, bring forth for the Lord the fruit of good works. But perhaps you will inquire of me, if the field is the world, who then is the potter who can have dominion over the world?
那麼你要看:所贖的,與其說是一塊田地那屬地的脆弱,不如說是全世界永恆的安全;因為福音書作者說:「基督來,不是要審判世界,乃是要叫世界因祂得救」(約翰福音三章)。我說,你要看:那筆銀錢與其說是一塊田的小小購置,不如說是全世界豐盛的產業,正如先知大衛所說:「你求我,我就將列國賜你為基業,將地極賜你為田產」(詩篇第二篇)。所以這塊田就是這整個世界,我們分散、播撒其中,為主結出善工的果子。但你或許要問我:既然田是世界,那能主宰世界的窯戶又是誰呢?
43:7
Nisi fallor ipse est figulus, qui vascula corporis nostri fecit e limo: de quo dicit Scriptura: Et fecit Deus hominem de limo terrae ( Gen. n). Ipse est figulus, qui carnium nostrarum cœnosum lutum vapore sui spiritus animavit, et materiem Ouidam, atque terrenam n ignito calore decoxit. Ipse, inquam, est figulus, qui nos per manus suas formavit ad vitam, per Christum suum reformavit ad gloriam, sicut ait Apostolus: Ad eamdem imaginem reformamur de gloria ingloriam (II Cor. m); scilicet, ut qui a 0 priore factura propriis vitiis corruimus, in secunda nalivitale figuli hujus misericordia reparemur;
Unless I am mistaken, He Himself is the potter who made the little vessels of our body from clay: of whom Scripture says, 'And God made man from the slime of the earth' (Genesis 2). He is the potter who animated the miry mud of our flesh with the breath of His Spirit, and, as it were, baked the moist and earthly matter with fiery heat. He, I say, is the potter who by His hands formed us unto life, and through His Christ reformed us unto glory, as the Apostle says: 'We are reformed into the same image, from glory unto glory' (2 Corinthians 3); namely, that we who by our own vices fell from our first making, may in a second birth be repaired by the mercy of this potter;
若我沒有弄錯,祂自己正是那用泥土造成我們身體這些小器皿的窯戶:論到祂,聖經說:「神用地上的塵土造人」(創世記二章)。祂就是那窯戶,用祂聖靈的氣息使我們肉體那污泥般的黏土有了生命,並彷彿以火熱煅燒了那濕潤而屬土的材料。我說,祂就是那窯戶,藉祂的手把我們塑造以致生命,又藉祂的基督把我們重塑以致榮耀,正如使徒所說:「我們……變成主的形狀,榮上加榮」(哥林多後書三章);就是說,我們既因自己的惡行從起初的受造中墮落,便在第二次的出生中,藉這窯戶的憐憫得以修復;
43:8
hoc est, qui per Adie transgressionem P morte concidimus, per Salvatoris gratiam denuo resurgamus. Ipse plane est figulus de quo dicit beatus Apostolus: Nunquid dicit figmentum ei, qui se finxit: Cur me fecisti sic? Et iterum: Nunquid non habet potestatem figulus luti ex eadem massa facere aliud quidem vas in honorem, aliud vero in contumeliam ( Rom. IX ) ? q Ex eodem enim luto corporis nostri Deus pro meritis singulorum alios reservat ad pœnam, alios ad gloriam. Istius utique figuli ager Christi sanguine emptus est peregrinis; peregrinis, inquam, qui erant 150 sine domo, sine patria, et toto orbe exsules jactabantur, requie Christi sanguine providetur;
that is, that we who fell in death through Adam's transgression, may rise again anew through the Saviour's grace. He plainly is the potter of whom the blessed Apostle speaks: 'Shall the thing formed say to him who formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?' And again: 'Has not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?' (Romans 9). For out of the same clay of our body God, according to the merits of each, reserves some unto punishment, others unto glory. This potter's field, bought with Christ's blood, is for strangers; for strangers, I say, who were without home, without country, and were tossed about as exiles throughout the whole world: for them rest is provided by Christ's blood;
就是說,我們既因亞當的過犯而在死中傾倒,就藉救主的恩典再度復起。祂顯然就是那窯戶,蒙福的使徒論到祂說:「受造之物豈能對造他的說:你為甚麼這樣造我呢?」又說:「窯戶難道沒有權柄,從同一團泥裡拿一塊做成貴重的器皿,又拿一塊做成卑賤的器皿嗎?」(羅馬書九章)因為神從我們身體同一團泥裡,照各人的功過,把一些人存留受刑罰,把另一些人存留得榮耀。這窯戶的田,用基督的血買下,是為旅客預備的;我說,是為那些無家、無鄉、彷彿被放逐者在全世界被拋來拋去的人:主的血為他們預備了安息;
43:9
ut quibus non est in mundo possessio, his in Christo sit sepultura. Istos autem peregrinos quos esse dicimus, nisi devotissimos Christianos, qui renuntiantes sæculo et nihil possidentes in mundo, in Christi sanguine requiescunt Christianus enim, qui mundum non possidet, hic totum possidet Salvatorem. Ideo autem peregrinis Christi sepultura promittitur, r at quis se a carnalibus vitiis tanquam peregrinum et alienum costodicrit, is Christi requiem mereatur. Sepultura enim Christi quid est aliud, nisi requies Christiani? Nos ergo peregrini in hoc mundo sumus, et tanquam hospites in hac luce versamur, sicut ait Apostolus dicens: Etenim dum sumus in hoc corpore peregrinamur a Domino (I Cor. v).
so that those who have no possession in the world may have burial in Christ. But these whom we call strangers, who are they but the most devout Christians, who, renouncing the world and possessing nothing therein, rest in Christ's blood? For the Christian who does not possess the world, here possesses the whole Saviour. And burial in Christ is promised to strangers for this reason: that whoever has kept himself, as a stranger and an alien, from carnal vices, may merit the rest of Christ. For what else is the burial of Christ but the rest of the Christian? We therefore are strangers in this world, and dwell as guests in this light, as the Apostle says: 'For while we are in this body, we are absent from the Lord' (2 Corinthians 5).
使那些在世上沒有產業的人,可以在基督裡得墳墓。而我們所稱為旅客的這些人,若不是那些極其虔誠的基督徒——他們捨棄世界、在世上一無所有,卻在基督的血中安息——又是誰呢?因為不擁有世界的基督徒,在此卻擁有整位救主。而基督裡的埋葬應許給旅客,其緣由乃是:凡如同旅客、外人一般,保守自己脫離肉體諸惡的人,便配得基督的安息。因為基督的埋葬,若不是基督徒的安息,又是甚麼呢?所以我們在這世界裡是旅客,如同客旅般住在此光中,正如使徒所說:「我們住在這身內,便與主相離」(哥林多後書五章)。
43:10
Peregrini, inquam, samus, et nobis Salvatoris sanguinis pretio empta est sepultura. Consepulti enim sumus, sicut ait Apostolus, cum illo per baptismum in mortem ( Gal. II ). Baptismum igitur Christi nobis est sepultura, in quo peccatis morimur, criminibus sepelimur, et veteris hominis conscientia resoluta, in alteram nativitatem rediviva iufantia reparamur; baptismum, inqaam,A Salvatoris nobis est sepullura: quia et ibi A perdi.. mus ante, quod viximus, et ibi denuo accipimus, ut vivamus. Magna igitur sepulturae bujus est gratia, in qua nobis et utilis mors infertur, et vita utilior condonatur; magna, inquam, hujus gratia sepulturæ, quæ et purificat peccatorem, et vivificat morientem.
We are strangers, I say, and a burial has been bought for us with the price of the Saviour's blood. For we were buried together with Him, as the Apostle says, through baptism into death (Colossians 2). Baptism therefore is for us the burial of Christ, in which we die to our sins, are buried with our crimes, and, the conscience of the old man being dissolved, we are restored to another birth in a revived infancy; baptism, I say, is for us the burial of the Saviour: because there we lose what we lived before, and there we receive anew, that we may live. Great therefore is the grace of this burial, in which both a profitable death is brought upon us, and a more profitable life is granted; great, I say, is the grace of this burial, which both purifies the sinner and gives life to the dying.
我說,我們是旅客,並且有一座墳墓已用救主寶血的價錢為我們買下。因為我們已與祂一同埋葬,正如使徒所說,藉著洗禮歸入死(歌羅西書二章)。所以洗禮對我們就是基督的埋葬,在其中我們向罪而死,與己罪一同被埋,並且舊人的良知既被消解,我們便在復甦的嬰孩之態中被更新,歸入另一次出生;我說,洗禮對我們就是救主的埋葬:因為我們既在那裡失去了先前所活的,又在那裡重新領受,以致得生。所以這埋葬的恩典何等偉大——在其中既有有益的死臨到我們,又有更為有益的生賜給我們;我說,這埋葬的恩典何等偉大,它既潔淨罪人,又使將死之人得生。
← ch. 42ch. 44 →
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284