📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 講道集

都靈的馬克西姆斯

講道集 第 284 章

拉丁文原文.140 節.部分字詞可點開查義

← 第 283 章
284:1
auctorem esse S, Maximum Taurinensem, idem Vallarsius loco supra indicato scribit: Nemine janu diffitente, quanquam S. Agobardus noni sæculi scriptor lib. contra Felicem cap. 20, laciniam quam suis infra locis notabimus ex ea describens, Hieronymi esse non dubitet. Habet, inquit, lector de eadem. re beati Hieronymi satis volitam et enucleatam sententiam, cum de illo divinas Scripturæ loco ageret, ubi dictum est: Ponam, etc. Erasmus e contrario, eloquentis quidem, inquit, et eruditi hominis fuit hæc epistola, ac diligenter elaborata; sed ita discrepans a phrasi Hieronymiana, ut nec hic illius dictionem potuerit imitari, si voluisset, nec hujus ille.
同一位瓦拉爾修斯在上文所引之處寫道:作者乃是都靈的聖馬克西穆斯——如今無人否認此事;儘管九世紀的作家聖阿哥巴爾在其《駁費利克斯》一書第二十章中,抄錄了其中一段(我們將在下文適當之處加以標註),卻不疑其為耶柔米所作。他說:「讀者關於這同一件事,可得著蒙福的耶柔米一段相當完備而清晰闡述的見解,那是他論及神聖經文中『我要立』等語之處時所發表的。」相反地,伊拉斯謨說:「這封書信固然出自一位口才與學識兼備之人,且經精心撰作;然而它與耶柔米的文風如此相異,以致此人縱使願意也無法模仿耶柔米的辭句,耶柔米也無法模仿此人的辭句。」
That the author is Saint Maximus of Turin, the same Vallarsius writes in the place cited above: with no one now denying it, although Saint Agobard, a writer of the ninth century, in his book Against Felix, chapter 20, transcribing a passage from it which we shall note in its proper place below, does not doubt that it is Jerome's. He says: 'The reader has, on this same matter, an opinion of blessed Jerome sufficiently full and clearly worked out, when he treated of that passage of divine Scripture where it is said: I will set,' and so on. Erasmus, on the contrary, says: 'This letter was indeed the work of an eloquent and learned man, and carefully elaborated; but it so differs from Jerome's manner of speech that neither could this man have imitated Jerome's diction had he wished, nor Jerome this man's.'
284:2
In plerisque codicibus nullumpræferebat nomen: in quibusdam Ctesiphontis erat additum. Nec in ipsa epistola ulla ejus fit mentio, ad quem scripta est. Meminit autem auctor sancti Ambrosii atque inventionis corporum SS. Gervasii et Protasii. Quam autem hæc etiam epistola indigna sii Mariano, ostensum a nobis est in præfatione ad appendicem. Janu vero varianles lectiones hujus epistolæ, quas subjecimus, excerptæ sunt ex codioe 9 Plat. XIX bibliothecæ Laurentianæ Florent., pag. 337. CAP. I. — Ecce iterum ad te scribo, et uihil dignum quod prudentiam tuam legere deceat invenio.
在大多數抄本中,此信未署任何名字;在某些抄本中則加上了克特西豐的名字。信中本身也未提及所寫的對象是誰。此外,作者提到聖安波羅修,以及聖熱瓦削與聖普洛大削二聖遺體的發現。至於這封信同樣如何配不上馬里亞努斯,我們已在附錄的序言中加以說明。我們所附的這封信的異文,乃是從佛羅倫斯勞倫圖書館第十九櫃第九號抄本第三三七頁節錄而來。第一章。——看哪,我再次寫信給你,卻找不出任何配得上你明智去讀的東西。
In most codices it bore no name; in certain ones the name of Ctesiphon was added. Nor in the letter itself is any mention made of him to whom it was written. The author, moreover, mentions Saint Ambrose and the finding of the bodies of Saints Gervasius and Protasius. But how unworthy this letter too is of Marianus, we have shown in the preface to the appendix. The variant readings of this letter, which we have appended, have been excerpted from codex 9, Plut. XIX of the Laurentian Library at Florence, page 337. CHAPTER I. — Behold, again I write to you, and I find nothing worthy that it should befit your prudence to read.
284:3
Et quia mirum, si a te absente velut a sole destitutum frigidi cordis alget ingenium, et mens a lumine peregrina stultitiæ nubilo b suffocata torpescit, ac tanto minus sapio quanto a te latius separor? Quod si impræsentiarumc quid tibi in meo sermone placuerit, tuis mihi orationibus prestabitur. Denique, ut omnem stultitiam meam diligentius recognoscas, etiam stomachum meum post illud susceptum d ceratum, t unc te absente curavi, a quo pejus mereor pati: cui post sanctum ministerium tuum et angelicam servitutem manus intuli medicorum, quasi propheta non esset in Israel, ut mihi, si quid paterer, facilius esse debuerit ad te reverti, quam gentiliter cogitare;
在你不在時,我的才思如同失去太陽的心一般冷卻,我的心思如同離開了光的異鄉客,被愚昧的雲霧所窒息而遲鈍,我與你相隔愈遠便愈發不智——這又何足為奇呢?但若在此刻我的言談中有任何令你喜悅之處,那必是藉你的禱告賜給我的。最後,為叫你更加留意我一切的愚拙:連我的胃,在敷上那蠟膏之後,我竟在你不在時自行醫治——我理當從你受更嚴厲的責罰;在你聖潔的服事與天使般的照料之後,我竟把醫生的手加在其上,彷彿以色列中並無先知一般;然而,我若有任何病痛,理應更容易回到你那裡,而非按外邦人的方式思想;
And is it any wonder if, in your absence, my talent grows cold like a heart deprived of the sun, and my mind, an exile from the light, grows numb, smothered by the cloud of folly, and I am the less wise the more widely I am parted from you? But if for the present anything in my discourse has pleased you, it will be granted to me by your prayers. Finally, that you may more diligently take note of all my folly: even my stomach, after the wax-plaster I had applied, I then tended in your absence — from you I deserve to suffer worse; upon it, after your holy ministry and angelic service, I laid the hands of physicians, as though there were no prophet in Israel, whereas, if I suffered anything, it ought to have been easier for me to return to you than to think in a pagan fashion;
284:4
et melius vel difficillimi itineris laborem perpeti quam conspectus tui tam pretiosa visione fraudari, ut quævis potius compensatio sequeretur, quam ad muscam religionis Accaron devenirem. Hæc mihi te absente mundus iste suggessit,qui te præsente c in me non habeat consilium. Tu me enim curiam feceras prophetarum, non conventiculum sirenarum. Al nunc in me ad destructionem sancti contra me operis lui omnis stultitæ senatus ingrediens, quadrupHci forma mecum agit. Nam fenus de absenteexigit, quod te praesente non præsumpsit, ut intelligas si quid apud te juxta Deum saput, tuum fuisse quod sapui. Sic absente Moyse populus Isracl fornicatur (Exod. XXXII);
寧可忍受最艱難旅途的勞苦,也勝過被剝奪你那容顏這般寶貴的景象,以致無論付出何等代價都甘願,也不肯去投奔以革倫那宗教的蒼蠅。這些念頭是這世界在你不在時向我提出的——這世界在你同在時,在我裡面毫無主意。因為你曾使我成為眾先知的殿堂,而非海妖的密會。但如今,那愚昧的整個議會為要毀壞那攻擊我、卻是聖潔的工作而進入我裡面,以四重的方式與我周旋。因它向缺席之人索取利息,這在你同在時它並不敢;為叫你明白:我若在你面前對神有幾分領悟,那領悟原是屬你的。摩西不在時,以色列百姓就行淫(出埃及記三十二章);
and it were better to endure the toil of even the most difficult journey than to be cheated of so precious a sight as your countenance, so that any recompense whatever should rather follow than that I should betake myself to the fly of the religion of Ekron. These things this world suggested to me in your absence — the world which, when you are present, has no counsel in me. For you had made me a court of the prophets, not a conventicle of sirens. But now, entering into me for the destruction of the holy work against me, the whole senate of folly deals with me in a fourfold manner. For it exacts usury from one absent, which in your presence it did not presume to do, that you may understand that if I had any savour of God about you, it was yours that I so savoured. Thus in Moses' absence the people of Israel commit fornication (Exod. XXXII);
284:5
sic in navi, Domnino dormiente, apostoli tempestate turbantur (Matth. VIII). Sic in Bethsaide porticibus hominem f non habentem aquam piscinæsalutaris ignorat (Joan. v). g Quantum et bic aliud genus culpae advertam. Corpuscolum curavi, cum anima langueret; exteriorem hominem fovi, cum interior ægrotaret: humanis subveni, cum divina laborarent, vitio pubicæ consnetudinis inclinatus, quo omnes sumus in minimis cauti, et in maximis negligente. Hocque ideo tit, quia ubi vera vita sit ignoramus. 124 Fallit nos videlicet sol iste, decipit dies ista, tractusnos iste circumvenit. Mundus inducit, dum et seMe amplius esse nihil putamus, et lucem arbitramur esse quam oculis videmus;
照樣,在船上主睡著時,眾使徒被風暴攪擾(馬太福音八章)。照樣,在畢士大的廊子裡,那無人把他放進醫治之池的人竟無人理會(約翰福音五章)。在此我也察覺另一種過失。當靈魂衰弱時,我卻醫治那微小的身體;當內在之人患病時,我卻撫養外在之人;當屬神之事在陣痛中時,我卻救助屬人之事——我被那普遍習俗的惡習所彎曲,這惡習使我們眾人在最小的事上謹慎,在最大的事上疏忽。這事之所以發生,是因我們不知道真生命在何處。這太陽誠然欺哄我們,這白晝迷惑我們,這光陰的流轉圍困我們。世界引我們走差路,叫我們以為沒有什麼比自己更大的,並把眼睛所見的當作光;
thus in the ship, while the Lord slept, the apostles are tossed by the tempest (Matt. VIII). Thus in the porticoes of Bethesda the man who has no one to put him into the healing pool is unknown (John V). Here too I mark another kind of fault. I tended the little body while the soul languished; I cherished the outer man while the inner was sick; I came to the aid of things human while things divine were in labour, bent as I was by the vice of common custom, whereby we are all cautious in the least matters and negligent in the greatest. And this happens because we do not know where the true life lies. This sun deceives us, of course, this day beguiles us, this span of time circumvents us. The world leads us astray, while we suppose that there is nothing greater than ourselves, and reckon that to be light which we see with our eyes;
284:6
et hominem judicamus esse quem cernimus, et mundum credimus facere cum vita, ignorantes ubi sit homo, et quid sit homo, et quæ ejus hominis vita sit: quod si intelligeremus, non aliud generati, aliud viveremus. Ita vitæ origine deserta, vivendi quoque perdidimus rationem. Ac primo ubi homo sit iste de quo loquimur audiamus, CAP. ii. — Quoniam disputationem quamdum nobis ipsa divisio h generavit, i quem intra hoc corpus, quod Dei artificis manu e limo terrae formatum est, velut quodam vasculo intellige contineri, dicente Apostolo: Habemus thesaurum istum in vasis fictilibus (U Cor. 4); qui ubique per hoc corpus infusus, vitalem sensum, qui sibi non deficit, cum carne mutuatus est.
我們把所看見的判為人,並相信是世界造成生命,卻不知人在何處、人是什麼、那人的生命又是什麼。但我們若明白這一點,就不會為此一目的而受造、卻為另一目的而活了。如此,我們既離棄了生命的源頭,也就喪失了活著的道理。首先,讓我們聽聽我們所論的那人在何處。第二章。——既然這區分本身已為我們生出一番論辯:你當明白,那被神聖的工匠之手用地上的泥土所塑造的身體,如同某個器皿一般,將他包含在內,正如使徒所說:我們有這寶貝放在瓦器裡(哥林多後書四章);他既遍佈於這身體之中,就從肉體借得一種不會離他而去的生命感覺。
and we judge that to be man which we behold, and believe that the world makes life, ignorant of where man is, and what man is, and what the life of that man is. But if we understood this, we should not have been begotten for one thing and live for another. Thus, having forsaken the source of life, we have lost also the reason for living. And first let us hear where that man is of whom we speak. CHAPTER II. — Since the very division has generated for us a certain disputation: whom you are to understand to be contained within this body, which was formed by the hand of the divine Craftsman from the mud of the earth, as it were within a vessel, the Apostle saying: We have this treasure in earthen vessels (2 Cor. IV); who, poured everywhere throughout this body, has borrowed from the flesh a vital feeling which does not fail him.
284:7
Regit ipse, non regitur, et habet potius quam habetur, ut vitam non accipiat, sed ministret. Nam cum terrenam istam pigramque materiam in usum ministerii sumptam spiritus liquidus animaret, fit dominus corporis, non homo sub corporei Denique hoc quod dixi vasculum i ipso vivit præsente, et ipso moritur abeunte. Hic ergo et visibilis et caducus, illius interioris vel habitatio, vel minister, vel vagina est. Ipse vero, qui vere est homo, k quoniam sii secundus, factæ divisionis est locus; ut ipse invisibilis, ita omnia ejus invisibilia sint necesse est. Non ad itlum, si aegrotat, manus valet pervenire medicorum; non herbarum succis, si deficit, reparatur.
他自己作主宰,而不受轄制;他佔有而非被佔有,以致他不是領受生命,而是分施生命。因為當那流動的靈使那被取來作服事之用、屬土而遲鈍的物質得著生命時,他便成了身體的主人,而非屈居肉體之下的人。總之,我所說的這器皿,在他同在時便活著,他離去時便死去。因此這可見而必朽之物,乃是那內在之人的居所,或僕役,或鞘。但他自己,那真正是人的——因他是第二者,他乃是那已成之區分的所在——正如他自己不可見,他一切所屬的也必然不可見。他若患病,醫生的手不能觸及;他若衰竭,也不能靠草藥的汁液得復原。
He himself rules, and is not ruled; he possesses rather than is possessed, so that he does not receive life but administers it. For when the liquid spirit gave life to that earthy and sluggish matter, taken up for the use of ministry, he becomes lord of the body, not a man beneath the bodily. In short, this vessel of which I spoke lives while he is present, and dies when he departs. This visible and perishable thing, then, is either the dwelling, or the minister, or the sheath of that inner man. But he himself, who is truly man — since he is the second, he is the place of the division that has been made — as he is himself invisible, so all his belongings must of necessity be invisible. To him, if he is sick, the hand of physicians cannot reach; if he fails, he is not restored by the juices of herbs.
284:8
Nihil ad eum corporeum intrare potest, substantiæ tantum suæ illi similitudo descendit, verbo curatur, obedientia convalescit. Demque cum sibi in Ecclesia Laodicensi et beatus et dives, et bere oculatus, et bene veslitus secundum exteriorem hominem videre(ur, increpatur a Domino, diciturque illi: Nescis quia tu es miser, el miserabilis, et pauper, et cæcus, et nudus (Apoc. III) ? Qui utique, III dixi, nec sine veste, nec 125 sine oculis, nec sine divitiis habebatur. Sed ille invisibilis Deus noster illum invisibilem hominem in paupertate, ia cecitate, in nuditate esse cornebat; cui etiam suadere dignalur ut.
沒有任何屬體之物能進入他裡面;惟有他自己本質的樣式降臨於他;他藉道得醫治,藉順服重得力量。總之,當他在老底嘉的教會中,按外在之人看來,既蒙福又富足,眼目明亮、衣著華美之時,他卻被主責備,主對他說:你豈不知你是那困苦、可憐、貧窮、瞎眼、赤身的嗎(啟示錄三章)?正如我所說,他原被算為並非沒有衣裳,並非沒有眼睛,並非沒有財富。但我們那不可見的神,卻看見那不可見的人正處於貧窮、瞎眼、赤身之中;並且屈尊向他進言,勸他
Nothing bodily can enter into him; only the likeness of his own substance descends to him; he is cured by the word, he regains strength by obedience. In short, when in the church of Laodicea he seemed, according to the outer man, both blessed and rich, and well-eyed and well-clothed, he is rebuked by the Lord, and it is said to him: Do you not know that you are wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked (Rev. III)? He who, as I have said, was reckoned neither without clothing, nor without eyes, nor without riches. But that invisible God of ours saw that invisible man to be in poverty, in blindness, in nakedness; and to him He deigns even to give counsel, that
284:9
ab ipso aurem mercetur ignitum, et vestem albaM, qua gloriosissime vestiatur, et collyrium, quo recipiat visum. Habet ergo et suos oculos præter istos carnales, quos potest vel amittere vel curare; et es juxta se nudus, adeo ut egeat vestimento: sed miro modo A ad medicum, ut ipse ait, Dominus loquitur, et jubet illum a se diviHas comparare. Quibus mercibus, si et nudus et pauper est, vel illam vestem nobilissimam, vel illud aurum purgatum jam igne mercabitur ? Unde commercii taiis poterit esse impensa ? Videlicet si aut extenoris hominis emolumenta transfoveat, aut ipsis quibus ipse dives forinsecus videbatur, non utendo ditescat;
當向主買那用火煉過的金子,和一件白衣好穿在身上、極其榮耀,以及眼藥好重得視力。因此,除這些屬肉體的眼睛之外,他還有自己的眼睛,這些眼睛他或能失去、或能醫治;至於他本身則是赤身的,甚至需要衣裳:但主竟以奇妙的方式向那醫者說話(正如主自己所言),並吩咐他從自己這裡置辦財富。他若既赤身又貧窮,要用什麼貨物去買那極尊貴的衣裳,或那已被火煉淨的金子呢?作這樣買賣的資本從何而來?就是說:他若非使外在之人所得的益處復甦,便是藉著不使用那些叫他外表看來富足之物,而變得富有;
he should buy from Him gold refined by fire, and a white garment with which he may be most gloriously clothed, and eye-salve by which he may recover sight. He has therefore his own eyes besides these carnal ones, which he can either lose or heal; and beside himself he is naked, so much so that he needs clothing: but in a wondrous manner the Lord speaks to the physician, as He himself says, and bids him procure riches from Him. With what wares, if he is both naked and poor, will he buy either that most noble garment or that gold now purged by fire? Whence can the outlay for such commerce come? Namely, if either he warms into life the emoluments of the outer man, or by not using the very things by which he outwardly seemed rich, he grows wealthy;
284:10
oculosque corporis, quibus mundialium rapiebatur ardore, despectu corruptae universitatis obcæcet. Ita ille invisibilis homo, qui vere, ut diximus, homo est, et in contemptu hujus exterioris attollitur, et nuditate vestitur et cæcitate illuminatur. Sic Jacob, Ephraim, et Manassen (Genes. XLVIII) nepotum suorum non solum loca, verum etiam merita b corporea caecitate cernebat. Nam cum illum Joseph filius suus, qui supradictos parvulos offerebat, c ne ante pedes suos cernere judicaret, sensit in parentis responsione d illum etiam. quae essent futura, prospicere. Sed ut ille interior homo exteriorem istum facit sua vita viventem, et de fonte naturae suæ animat irrigando:
並且讓他藉著鄙視這敗壞的宇宙,使那些曾叫他被世俗慾望擄去的肉身之眼變瞎。如此,那不可見之人(他真如我們所說,才是人),既在鄙視這外在之人中被高舉,又以赤身為衣,以瞎眼得光照。所以,雅各藉著肉身的瞎眼,不僅辨明了他孫兒以法蓮與瑪拿西的位置,也辨明了他們的分量(創世記四十八章)。因為當他的兒子約瑟獻上前述那兩個孩童、以為他在腳前看不見他們時,他卻從這父親的回答中察覺到,他甚至預見了將來的事。但正如那內在之人以自己的生命使這外在之人活著,並從自己本性的泉源澆灌而賜它生命:
and let him blind the eyes of the body, by which he was carried away with desire for worldly things, through contempt of the corrupt universe. Thus that invisible man, who truly, as we have said, is man, is both exalted in the contempt of this outer man, and clothed with nakedness, and enlightened with blindness. So Jacob discerned, by a bodily blindness, not only the places but also the merits of Ephraim and Manasseh, his grandsons (Gen. XLVIII). For when his son Joseph, who was presenting the aforesaid little ones, judged that he could not see them before his feet, he perceived in the father's answer that he foresaw even the things that were to be. But just as that inner man makes this outer one live by his own life, and gives it life by irrigating it from the fount of his own nature:
284:11
sic rursum exterior per corruptelam mortiferæ materiei suae, illum, si cupiditatibus illicitis alligarit, occidit. Et cum alter naturae videatur alterius, transit in victoris unusquisque substantiam, a ut aut carnalem quoque spiritualis spiritualem suis virtutibus præstet, aut carnalem animam caro victrix ejus efficiat. Denique cum Dominus delere humanum genus cogitaret iratus: Non permanebit, inquit, Spiritus meus in hominibus, quoniam caro sunt (Genes. vi). Et quia utique omnes carne vestimur, et sine dubio in carne non sumus, qui non secundum carnem ambulamus, binc etiam gignitur, ut non semper homo isto appellationis nomine censeatur.
照樣,反過來,那外在之人,藉著他自己那帶來死亡之物質的敗壞,若用不法的慾望捆綁了那內在之人,便將他殺死。既然二者的本性彼此各異,每一者都轉入得勝者的本質之中,以致或是屬靈之人以自己的德行使那屬肉體之人也成為屬靈的,或是得勝的肉體使他的靈魂成為屬肉體的。最後,當主在忿怒中決意除滅人類時,祂說:我的靈不永遠住在人裡面,因為他們是屬肉體的(創世記六章)。既然我們眾人固然都被肉體所披覆,然而我們這些不隨從肉體而行的人,無疑並不在肉體之中;由此也可見,人並非總是以這稱謂之名被稱呼。
so, on the other hand, the outer man, through the corruption of his own death-bearing matter, kills the inner man, if he has bound him with unlawful desires. And since each seems of a nature different from the other, each passes into the substance of the victor, so that either the spiritual man renders the carnal also spiritual by his own virtues, or the conquering flesh makes his soul carnal. Finally, when the Lord in wrath resolved to blot out the human race, He said: My Spirit shall not remain in men, because they are flesh (Gen. VI). And since indeed we are all clothed with flesh, and yet without doubt we who do not walk according to the flesh are not in the flesh, it comes about from this too that man is not always reckoned by this name of appellation.
284:12
Nam pro virtutibus suis aut vitiis, et formas sumit et nomina. Denique ait propheta: Nolite fieri sicut equus et mulus Psal. XXXI). Sunt ergo homines qui apud Dominum sunt equi et muli. Et Dominus ait: Nolite projicere margaritas vestras ante porcos (Matth. VII). Sunt ergo homines et porci. Et iterum ipse Dominus: Ecce ego mitto vos, sicut oves in medio luporum (Matth. x). Sunt ergo homines et lupi; et econtrario homines sunt et oves. Et ait adhuc Dominus Petro: Pasce oves meas (Joan. XXI); et ipse prius: Veni post me, et faciam te piscatorem hominum (Matth. IV). Sunt ergo homines et pisces. Sed formæ actuum videntur esse, non corporum.
因為他按著自己的德行或惡行,取得了不同的形態與名稱。所以先知說:你們不要像那無知的騾馬(詩篇三十二篇)。因此有些人在主眼中乃是騾馬。主又說:不要把你們的珍珠丟在豬前(馬太福音七章)。因此有些人乃是豬。主自己又說:看哪,我差你們去,如同羊進入狼群(馬太福音十章)。因此有些人乃是狼;反過來也有些人乃是羊。主還對彼得說:你餵養我的羊(約翰福音二十一章);祂先前又說:來跟從我,我要叫你得人如得魚(馬太福音四章)。因此有些人乃是魚。但這些顯然是行為的形態,而非身體的形態。
For according to his virtues or vices he takes on both forms and names. Thus the prophet says: Do not become like the horse and the mule (Ps. XXXI). There are therefore men who in the Lord's sight are horses and mules. And the Lord says: Do not cast your pearls before swine (Matt. VII). There are therefore men who are also swine. And again the Lord Himself: Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves (Matt. X). There are therefore men who are also wolves; and on the contrary there are men who are also sheep. And the Lord still says to Peter: Feed my sheep (John XXI); and He said before: Come after me, and I will make you a fisher of men (Matt. IV). There are therefore men who are also fish. But these appear to be forms of actions, not of bodies.
284:13
Nam corporis nostri certus est status, ut omnium animantium; sed quoniam apud Deum non de statu corporis nostri, sed de vitae meritis judicamur, apparet omnem hominem mente sua sibi ipsi statum nomenque formare. Quod ulique ex illius, quem describimus, invisibilis hominis aut culpa, aut virtute præstatur. Ipsius siquidem vitium est, r si subjectus passus sit esse subjectus; si contra divinam dispositionem sit in dominatu servitus, et in servitute 126 dominatus.
因為我們身體的狀況乃是固定的,如同一切生物;但既然在神面前,我們不是按身體的狀況、而是按生命的功過受審判,可見每個人都藉自己的心思為自己塑造其狀況與名稱。這誠然乃是由我們所描述的那不可見之人的過失或德行所致。因為這正是他的惡:若他既被置於受制之地,卻甘心讓自己受制;若違背神的安排,在當作主宰之處反成了奴役,在當作奴役之處反成了主宰。
For the condition of our body is fixed, as of all living creatures; but since before God we are judged not by the condition of our body but by the merits of our life, it appears that every man forms for himself, by his own mind, his condition and name. And this indeed is furnished either by the fault or by the virtue of that invisible man whom we are describing. For it is his very vice, if, being made subject, he suffers himself to be subject; if, contrary to the divine disposition, there is servitude in ruling, and lordship in servitude.
284:14
Sed ne videar (quoniam paululum dejecto velut pariete ad illum invisibilem hominem disputatione perveni) corpus omnino destruere, quod adeo magni est sacramenti, ut in hoc ipso, id est in nostro- fragili et iufirmo Dominus venerit, non hoc egi, aut hoc ago; sed illud ostendere tentavi hujus exterioris vitam illius interius vita consistere; iterum interioris mortem descendere hujus de morte: ubi propinatum venenum per vitia fuerit, nihil habere istum de vita; nisi ab illo irrigatus fuerit, nihil tenere; alterumque in naturam alterius, ut dixi, aut infectum vitiis, aut detersum virtute transire.
但恐怕我看似——因我既彷彿拆下了一小段牆,便藉論述抵達了那不可見之人——要全然拆毀身體;然而身體乃是這般偉大之奧祕,以致主正是在這身體、即在我們這脆弱衰殘的身體中降臨;因此我並未如此行,也不是在如此行;我只是試圖顯明:這外在之人的生命,在乎那內在之人的生命;反過來,內在之人的死,也源於這外在之人的死;一旦藉諸惡把毒藥灌入,這外在之人便毫無生命;除非被那內在之人所澆灌,他就一無所持;並且如我所說,一者轉入另一者的本性,或被諸惡所感染,或被德行所潔淨。
But lest I seem — since, having as it were pulled down a bit of the wall, I have arrived by discussion at that invisible man — to be destroying the body altogether, which is of so great a sacrament that in this very body, that is, in our frail and infirm one, the Lord came, I have not done this, nor am I doing it; but I have attempted to show that the life of this outer man consists in the life of that inner man; that again the death of the inner descends from the death of this one; that where poison has been administered through vices, this outer man has nothing of life; that unless he has been irrigated by the inner, he holds nothing; and that the one passes into the nature of the other, as I have said, either infected by vices or cleansed by virtue.
284:15
Igitur quoniam jam et ubi sit homo, et quid sit homo, rerer licet, ostendi, quæ nunc ejus hominis vita sit videamus. I Si enim ista certe mundialis vita, quae mala pro bonis habet, et bona pro malis, quam totus orbis sequitur et colit, non haec in affluentia divitiarum est, non in fastigio potentiae, non in jurisdictionis astu, non in pompositate facundiae, non in viribus per praelia gloriosis, non in mercibus provinciarum mutatione et sui peregrinatione crescentibus, non in lenocinio formarum, non in ambitu munerum, non in his est denique omnibus quæ videmus; quoniam cuncta haec occidunt, et sine istis beate etiam juxta saeculum vivi solet.
因此,既然我已按所容許的顯明了人在何處、人是什麼,讓我們來看看如今那人的生命是什麼。因為那屬世的生命——它以惡為善、以善為惡,是全世界所追隨並經營的——這生命不在乎財富的豐裕,不在乎權勢的顯赫,不在乎司法的詭詐,不在乎口才的浮華,不在乎戰陣中榮耀的武力,不在乎藉各省貿易的往來與自身奔波而增長的貨財,不在乎美色的誘惑,不在乎官職的鑽營,總之不在乎我們所見的這一切;因為這一切都要消逝,甚至按世界的標準,人也慣於在沒有這些的情況下過蒙福的生活。
Therefore, since I have now shown, so far as is permitted, both where man is and what man is, let us see what the life of that man now is. For if that worldly life, which holds evils for goods and goods for evils, which the whole world follows and cultivates — this life is not in the affluence of riches, not in the height of power, not in the cunning of jurisdiction, not in the pomp of eloquence, not in strength glorious in battles, not in merchandise increasing by the exchange of provinces and by its own travels, not in the allurement of beauties, not in the canvassing for offices, not, in short, in all these things which we see; since all these things pass away, and even according to the world a blessed life is wont to be lived without them.
284:16
Sed illa est vita vera, II vita veneranda, Deum nosse, timere ejus potentiam, amare pietatem, mundum in opifice mirari, interpellatorem contemnere, esse victu modico pro naturæ necessitate contentum, veste viii vel pro pudoris ratione, vel pro temporis injuria curomunitum. Sic reliquam creaturam non ex sui copia, vel pro vitali ratione, i sed pro adjumento hujus lucis attingere. Quidquid enim amplius est, a malo est:
但那才是真生命,是可敬的生命:認識神,敬畏祂的權能,愛慕祂的憐憫,在造物主身上驚嘆這世界,鄙視那試探者,按本性的需要以微薄的飲食為足,以廉價的衣裳蔽體——無論是為著羞恥的緣故,或是為抵擋時節的嚴酷。如此,接觸其餘的受造物,不是出於其豐足,也不是為維生的緣由,而是為扶持這現世之光。因為凡多於此的,都是出於惡:
But that is the true life, the venerable life: to know God, to fear His power, to love His mercy, to marvel at the world in its Maker, to despise the tempter, to be content with modest fare according to nature's necessity, to be clad in cheap clothing whether for the sake of modesty or against the harshness of the season. Thus to touch the rest of creation not out of its abundance, nor for a vital reason, but for the support of this present light. For whatever is more than this is of evil:
284:17
omnem hominem amare quasi fratrem, nullum lædere, servire omnibus, formam servi sustinere cum Domino, qui nobis praeter ministerium quod interius continetur, quotidie servit in mundo, producendo solem, emittendo lucem, pluvias inlundendo, tempora variando, fruges vel gignendo, vel maturando. Nobisenim in totius creaturae facie, vel ubertate deservit, quoniam pro nobis cuncta generavit. Sed ut ad hominis officia revertamur, nudum tegere, alere esurientem, sitientem potare, infinnos visitare, tristibus condolere mortuos sepelire, nihil apud se habere quasi suum, sed omnia sua cum omnibus judicare communia, ac tunc magis sibi vivere;
愛每一個人如同弟兄,不傷害任何人,服事眾人,與主一同承受僕人的樣式——主除了那內在所含的服事之外,還天天在世上服事我們:使太陽升起,發出光來,降下雨水,變換時節,使五穀既生長又成熟。因祂在一切受造物的面貌與豐盛中服事我們,因祂為我們生成了萬物。但,回到人的本分上來:給赤身的穿衣,給飢餓的吃飯,給口渴的喝水,探望病人,與憂傷的同哀,埋葬死者,不把任何東西當作自己私有的存留,反而把自己一切所有的都判為與眾人共有的,那時反倒更是為自己而活;
to love every man as a brother, to injure no one, to serve all, to bear the form of a servant along with the Lord, who — besides the ministry which is contained within — daily serves us in the world by bringing forth the sun, sending out light, pouring down rains, varying the seasons, both begetting and ripening the crops. For He serves us in the face and abundance of all creation, since He generated all things for us. But, to return to man's duties: to clothe the naked, to feed the hungry, to give the thirsty drink, to visit the sick, to grieve with the sorrowful, to bury the dead, to keep nothing by him as his own, but to judge all his goods common with all, and then rather to live for himself
284:18
cum vivere æstimatur aliis, sibique recondere cum aliis creditur erogare. Et haec tamen adhuc exterioris hominis lineamenta contingunt. CAP. III. — Cæterum illa interioris hominis vita in divinarum rerum cognitione consistit: non qua eælum terrae parte volvatur, non aD contrario cursu sicera rapianlur, non an Uceano generet plenitudo anaris augumentum, non an orbem mundi rotunditas ipsa suspendat, an quadriforma angulis prominentioribus astringat, an unus ipse mundus sit, an plures sint. i Nam hæc ad animae non tendunt utilitatem, et apud Deum stulta judicantur; sed in illis sanis cogitationibus, si quando versatur, tunc vivit, et pascitur. Quæ sunt autem istae sanx cogitationes?
當他被認為是為別人而活時,並當他被認為是與別人一同施捨時,反倒是在為自己積存。然而這些仍只觸及外在之人的輪廓。第三章。——但那內在之人的生命,在乎對屬神之事的認識:不在乎地是循天空的哪一部分而運轉,不在乎乾地被何等相反的運行所席捲,不在乎大洋中海水的滿溢是否生出增長,不在乎那圓形本身是否使世界的球體懸浮,抑或以四角凸出的稜角將它箍緊,不在乎這世界究竟是一個,還是有許多個。因為這些事無益於靈魂,在神面前被判為愚拙;惟有當它時常思想那些健全的思念時,它才活著、才得滋養。那麼,什麼是這些健全的思念呢?
when he is deemed to live for others, and to lay up for himself when he is believed to give out along with others. And yet these things still touch upon the lineaments of the outer man. CHAPTER III. — But that life of the inner man consists in the knowledge of divine things: not by what part of the sky the earth is revolved, not by what contrary course the dry things are swept along, not whether in the Ocean the fullness of the sea begets increase, not whether the very roundness suspends the globe of the world, or binds it fast with four-formed projecting corners, not whether the world itself is one, or whether there are many. For these things do not tend to the soul's benefit, and before God are judged foolish; but in those sound thoughts, when at any time it dwells, then it lives and is nourished. But what are these sound thoughts?
284:19
Illæ sine dubio, cum mens nostra sui recordatur auctoris; cum illum 127 velut per quamdam resipiscenliam suam, opificem suum veneratur ac contuetur, cumi ejus opera, ipsum in eius operibus visura miratur, dicente'beato Paulo: Invisibilia enim ejus a creatura mundi per ea quæ facta sunt, intellecta, conspiciuntur, et sempiterna quoque ejus virtus et divinitas (Rom. I):
無疑就是這些:當我們的心思記念它的創造者時;當它彷彿藉著某種回轉歸己,敬拜並默想它的造物主時;當它驚嘆祂的作為,將要在祂的作為中看見祂自己時,正如蒙福的保羅所說:自從造天地以來,神那看不見的事,藉著所造之物就可以曉得,是明明可知的,就是祂的永能和神性(羅馬書一章):
Those, without doubt, when our mind remembers its Author; when it venerates and contemplates its Maker, as it were through a certain coming to itself; when it marvels at His works, about to see Him Himself in His works, as blessed Paul says: For the invisible things of Him, from the creation of the world, being understood through the things that are made, are clearly seen, and His eternal power also and Godhead (Rom. I):
284:20
id est, cum ex immensis visibilibus creaturae ad uuiversilatem invisibilis Creatoris extendimur, et illum per hæc dum inaestimabilem discimus, æstimamus, cum ejus altitudinem per donum Spiritus sandi evolventes quoniam ipse solus nos in ipsum, qui ex ipso est, intromittit),omnia principia creaturae surgentis, quasi iacti ab ipso anteriores aspicimus, et cum a quæ Deus fecit, quasi faciat adhuc, intuemur Mundique totam originem transcurrentes, ceu autiquiores efficimur quam sumus aetate; et cum universa priusquam nos essemus effecta sint, naturam tamen omnium, quasi per nos genitam, dum auctori inscrimur, reputamus: in quam non ut serviremus, sed ut dominaremur, intravimus:
就是說:當我們從受造界那浩瀚的可見之物,被伸展向那不可見之造物主的普世性時,並當我們藉這些而學知祂為不可測度、卻仍加以測度時;當我們藉著聖靈的恩賜展開祂的崇高(因惟有那從自己而出的祂,才引我們進入祂自己之中),我們便彷彿是先於受造之物、由祂所拋出的,觀看那漸興之受造界的一切開端;並當我們注視神所造之物,彷彿祂仍在造作它們時;我們既奔越整個世界的起源,便彷彿變得比我們實際的年歲更古老;縱然宇宙在我們存在之先已被造成,然而當我們被接入那創造者之時,卻把萬物的本性算為彷彿是藉我們而生的:我們進入其中,不是為要服役,乃是為要作主宰:
that is, when from the immense visible things of creation we are stretched out toward the universality of the invisible Creator, and while through these we learn Him to be inestimable, we do estimate Him; when, unrolling His height through the gift of the Holy Spirit (since He alone admits us into Himself, who is from Himself), we look upon all the beginnings of rising creation as though we were prior, cast forth from Him; and when we behold the things that God made as though He were still making them; and, running through the whole origin of the world, we become as it were more ancient than we are in age; and although the universe was made before we existed, yet we reckon the nature of all things as though begotten through us, while we are engrafted into the Author: into which we entered not that we might serve, but that we might rule:
284:21
a separati itaque a sapientia mundiali, que universa, aut fortuitis, aut atomis ascribit; divinis meditationibus sublimati, et ab illis qui aut materiam semper fuisse dixerunt, b Deumque tantum artificem rerum voluerunt, separati per ipsius adjutorium; aut qui haec ipsa pro diis elementa colnerunt; aut qui familias deorum per sexus, per ætates, per partes, velut per plebem aliquam subjectam sensibus introduxerunt, discreti per Spiritum sanctum, et in altiora subducti vera vita viventes, hoc est veram sapientiam sapientes, c qua stultitia ista caret: recordemur quod mundus ex nihilo a Deo factus est, et quod cuncta animalia per Deum, Verbo opitice, vocata venerunt, quæ a natura non fuerunt.
因此,我們既與那把宇宙歸諸偶然或原子的屬世智慧分離;又被屬神的默想所高舉,並藉祂自己的幫助,與那些主張物質永遠存在、只肯以神為萬物工匠之人分離;或與那些把這些元素當作神明來敬拜之人分離;或與那些按性別、按年齡、按地域引進諸神家族、彷彿引進某群屈從於感官之民眾的人分離——我們既被聖靈分別出來,被提到更高之境,過那真生命,就是以那真智慧為智——這智慧乃是那愚昧所缺的:讓我們記念,世界是神從無有中所造的,並且一切生物,是藉神、以道為工匠所召喚而來,本非出於自然。
separated therefore from worldly wisdom, which ascribes the universe either to chance or to atoms; uplifted by divine meditations, and separated by His own help from those who have said that matter always existed and would have God to be only the craftsman of things; or from those who have worshipped these very elements as gods; or from those who have introduced families of gods, by sexes, by ages, by regions, as it were like some populace subject to the senses — set apart by the Holy Spirit, and drawn up into higher things, living the true life, that is, being wise with true wisdom, of which this folly is destitute: let us remember that the world was made out of nothing by God, and that all living creatures came, called forth through God, the Word being craftsman, which were not from nature.
284:22
Quoniam soli ipsi fas est vocare quæ non sunt, tanquam ea quae sunt; quod ipsum hominem, cui tanta possessio parabatur, ad imaginem suam non aliquis Prometheus ex fabula, sed ille condilor universitatis manu quoque sua, ne qua pars ejus vacaret in nobis, de limo terræ facere dignatus est: quae cogitatio, ut dixi, vita est animæ; quoniam haec prima est ratio vivendi, ut cui se debeat anima non ignoret; ne alium praeter hunc decepta veneretur, ne vitae suae ministeria velut vitæ auctores adoret; ne in tantum elementa miretur, ut non digna judicet quæ facta credantur, cum ille magis sit admirandus qui tam miranda produxit. 0 quam d augusta est hæc divina cogitatio, et quam vitae plena est!
因為惟有祂才有權柄,將那不存在的呼喚為存在的;並且人本身,就是那為之預備如此大產業的——祂竟屈尊按自己的形像去造他,不是寓言中的某個普羅米修斯,而是那宇宙的創立者親手用地上的泥土所造,免得他有任何一部分在我們身上有所欠缺:這思念,如我所說,乃是靈魂的生命;因為這是活著的首要原則,就是靈魂不可不知它把自己歸屬於誰;免得它受迷惑而敬拜這一位以外的別神;免得它把維繫其生命的僕役當作生命的創始者來敬拜;免得它如此驚嘆那些元素,以致把那些被認為是受造之物判為不足稱奇,而其實那造出如此奇妙之物的祂,才更當受人驚嘆。哦,這屬神的思念何等崇高,又何等充滿生命!
For to Him alone is it lawful to call the things that are not, as though they were; and man himself, for whom so great a possession was being prepared, He deigned to make in His own image — not some Prometheus out of a fable, but that Founder of the universe — with His own hand also, from the mud of the earth, lest any part of him be lacking in us: which thought, as I have said, is the life of the soul; since this is the first principle of living, that the soul should not be ignorant to whom it owes itself; lest, deceived, it venerate another besides Him; lest it adore the ministers of its life as though they were the authors of life; lest it marvel so greatly at the elements that it judge unworthy the things which are believed to be made, when He rather is to be admired who produced things so marvellous. O how august is this divine thought, and how full of life!
284:23
0 quantum ipsum hominem ad omne studium probitatis accendit ! O quantum illi majestatem sui commendat auctoris, cum aliud ille nihil in creatura omni præter se manu Dei formatum esse considerat; non terram, non mana, non coelum, non denique sidera tam luunda, tam pura, tam lucida; hominem solum cujusdam limi, et gravioris et sordidioris elementi, illa formatum esse dextera, cujus dextera palmus coelum mensurat in mensura; cujus pugillus terræ spatia tam intiuita jacentis includit, tanti fuit illum fuisse olim. Videamas tamen quantum illi praeterea applaudat benignitas Creatoris, quae non illum de sideribus effecit:
哦,這思念何等強烈地激動人本身去追求各樣的正直!哦,它何等地向他推薦其創造者的威嚴,當他思想:在全受造界中,除他自己以外,別無一物是由神的手所塑造的;不是地,不是海,不是天,總之不是那些如此明亮、如此純潔、如此璀璨的星辰;惟獨人,這由某種泥土、由更沉重更卑賤之元素所成的,卻是被那右手所塑——那右手的手掌以度量丈量諸天,那右手的拳頭將如此無邊鋪展的大地空間握於其中——他曾經存在,其價值竟是如此之大。然而讓我們再看看,造物主的恩慈何等地嘉許他,因祂並沒有用星辰造他:
O how greatly it kindles man himself to every pursuit of uprightness! O how greatly it commends to him the majesty of his Author, when he considers that nothing else in all creation, besides himself, was formed by the hand of God; not the earth, not the sea, not heaven, not, in short, the stars so bright, so pure, so luminous; that man alone, formed of a certain mud, and of a heavier and baser element, was fashioned by that right hand whose palm measures out heaven by measure; whose fist encloses the spaces of the earth lying so boundless — of such worth was it that he once existed. Yet let us see how greatly, besides, the kindness of the Creator applauds him, in that He did not make him from the stars:
284:24
quoniam, si esset inde creatus, de materia potius claritate quam de artificis dignatione polleret, cum minor ipse sui corporis origine videretur. 128 e Si de coelestibus factus ad terrarum cultum deduceretur ad terras, cui esset gloriosius mox futurum de humo excitatum sideribus imponi. Suum, inquam, Deus noster, suum proprie voluit esse, quod sumus, nihil materia nihil elementis, nibil quibuslibet principiis, vel magnis vel minimis, nos debere.
因為,他若是從那裡受造的,就會憑其材料的光輝、而非憑工匠的恩慈而顯尊貴,因這樣他自己看來反倒比其身體的來源更卑微。他若由屬天之物所造,卻被降下來到地上、去耕種田土——對這人來說,倒是從泥土中被喚起、被安置於星辰之間,很快就成為更榮耀的事了。我說,我們的神特意要那作為我們本相的,成為專屬祂自己的,好叫我們無所虧欠於物質,無所虧欠於元素,無所虧欠於任何本原,無論大小。
since, if he had been created from thence, he would have prevailed rather by the brightness of his material than by the graciousness of the Craftsman, seeing that he would himself seem lesser than the origin of his own body. If, made from heavenly things, he were led down to the tilling of the earth, to the lands — for whom it would soon be more glorious to be roused from the soil and set among the stars. His own, I say, our God willed to be His own in a special sense, this that we are, that we should owe nothing to matter, nothing to the elements, nothing to any principles whatever, whether great or small.
284:25
Quæ cuncta si retractet, et in se mens conversa consideret, ex nostris fiunt moderatiora, et angustiora primordiis.f At ubi per contactum formati manus Dei desivimus esse quod fuimus, et in novam materiae qualitatem subjacens, opitici suo per elementi conversationem clarificata natura est, novumque corporis nostri inter elementa, si fas est dici, g esse coepit elementum, statim omnibus mundi corporibus sublimiores sumus effecti, non naturæ substantia, sed potentia Conditoris, per quam de subjacenti caeteris creaturis ortum est, quod creaturis omnibus imperaret.
這一切,心思若加以重思,並回轉歸己而細想,便顯得比我們最初的來源更為卑微而狹小。但當我們既被神手的觸摸所塑造,就不再是原來的我們,並且既屈服於物質的新性質,我們的本性便藉那元素的變化為它的工匠而得榮耀,於是——若容許如此說——在諸元素之中便開始有了我們身體這新的元素;我們立時被造得比世上一切物體更為崇高,這不是憑我們本性的本質,而是憑那創造者的能力,藉這能力,從那原本屈居其他受造物之下的,興起了那要管轄一切受造物的。
All which things if the mind reconsider, and, turned in upon itself, ponder, they become more moderate and narrower than our first beginnings. But when, formed by the touch of God's hand, we ceased to be what we were, and, submitting to a new quality of matter, our nature was made glorious for its Craftsman through the transformation of the element, and there began to be a new element of our body among the elements — if it is lawful so to say — at once we were made more sublime than all the bodies of the world, not by the substance of our nature, but by the power of the Founder, through which there arose, from that which lay beneath the other creatures, that which should command all creatures.
284:26
Denique si metallum nostra carnis et corporis intuearis, nihil humilius, nihil vilius, nihil invenies omni injuriæ passionique subjectius. Sola terra elementorum cæterorum videtur ancilla; sola in se cunctorum potentias non sine detrimento sui sentit, vel dum ventis pulverulenta dispergitur, vel dum fluctibus humefacta absorbetur, vel dum siderum ignibus cocta devoratur: ut homo ex ea se esse non modo gloriari non queat, sed etiam possit erubescere. At vero si statum nostrum contemplemur, D quoniam præstantior est caeteris animantibus, dum ad suam imaginem Deus informatum inducit, invenies terram ipsam semen esse nostri corporis.
總之,你若看我們肉體與身體所用的材料,就找不到比它更卑微、更低賤、更受盡一切損傷與苦難的。惟獨地被看作其他元素的婢女;惟獨它在自身之內感受眾元素的威力,且不無自身的損害:或當它被風吹得塵土飛揚,或當它被水浸濕而遭洪流吞沒,或當它被星辰之火烤炙而被焚燒殆盡:以致人不但不能誇口自己出於它,甚至還當為此羞愧。但誠然,我們若默想我們的境況——因它比其他生物更為卓越,正因神使它按自己的形像受造而引它進來——你便會發現,正是那地乃是我們身體的種子。
In short, if you look upon the metal of our flesh and body, you will find nothing humbler, nothing baser, nothing more subject to every injury and suffering. Earth alone seems the handmaid of the other elements; alone it feels within itself the powers of all, not without harm to itself, whether when it is scattered dusty by the winds, or when, moistened, it is swallowed up by the floods, or when, baked by the fires of the stars, it is devoured: so that man cannot only not boast that he is from it, but can even blush. But truly, if we contemplate our condition, since it is more excellent than the other living creatures — inasmuch as God brings it in, formed after His own image — you will find that very earth to be the seed of our body.
284:27
Si quis in ea sensus est, gandere potuisset, quod propter nos, in quibus imaginem et similitudinem Creatoris accepit, felicior facta sit demutata quam sit orta. Manus enim Dei contigit eam, cujus contactum sui causa dum fieret, ipsa non meruit. Quid enim hoc statu præclarius? quid poterimus nosse sublimius? quid tam diligenter in membra digestum ? quid tam decore per articulos iuflexum ? quid tam sublimiter in ora et oculos erectum ? quid tam vocaliter in verba modulatum? quid in corda tam vivaciter animatum ? quid in sensu ditius ? quid in cogitatione secretius ? quid in sermone effusius ? quid in ingenio fortius ? quid in dispositione instructius? quid in memoria tenacius?
地中若有任何感覺,它本可歡喜:為了我們的緣故——在我們身上,它承受了創造者的形像與樣式——它因被轉化而變得比它原本被生成時更為有福。因為神的手觸摸了它,而這觸摸原是為它自己而發生時、它本不配得的。因為還有什麼比這境況更輝煌?我們還能知道什麼更崇高?有什麼被這般精心地分佈為肢體?有什麼被這般優雅地藉關節彎曲?有什麼被這般高聳地立為面容與眼目?有什麼被這般發聲地調節為言語?有什麼在心中被這般生氣勃勃地賦予生命?在感覺上有什麼更豐富?在思想上有什麼更隱祕?在言談上有什麼更豐沛?在天賦上有什麼更剛強?在稟性上有什麼更周備?在記憶上有什麼更持久?
If there were any feeling in it, it could have rejoiced that, for our sake — in whom it received the image and likeness of the Creator — it was made happier by being transformed than it was by being brought forth. For the hand of God touched it, whose touch, for its own sake, while it was coming to pass, it did not deserve. For what is more illustrious than this condition? What could we know more sublime? What so carefully digested into limbs? What so gracefully bent through the joints? What so loftily raised up into face and eyes? What so vocally modulated into words? What so vivaciously animated in the heart? What richer in sense? What more secret in thought? What more copious in speech? What stronger in genius? What better furnished in disposition? What more tenacious in memory?
284:28
quid in affectu blandius? quid in cogitatu sublimius? Ut evidenter appareat quod illum protoplastum jam tum omnibus dignitatibus venustatum, imo statum Filii sui Dei nostri ad finem sæculorum pro redemptione nostra venturi, in hoc corpus ornarit; cui paradisum etiam illo tempore, velut amœnissimum prædium, et urbanis convenustatum, et rusticis consitum, sub lege donatum mortis, ille præseminator invidit, venenumque suum decipiendo primorum hominum credulam novitatem in corpora nostra latenter immersit, et ex duabus substantiis unicam hominis perfectamque naturam quadam divisionis discordia dissecavit:
在情感上有什麼更溫柔?在思念上有什麼更崇高?以致顯然可見:祂把那受造之初的人裝飾成這身體,那人當時已被賦予一切尊榮——不如說,是把祂的兒子、我們的神,那位要在諸世代之末為我們的救贖而來者的樣式裝飾其中;祂在那時也把樂園賜給那人,立在死亡的律法之下,如同一座極其怡人的莊園,既以都邑之雅致妝點,又栽種著田野的植物:那起初的撒種者(魔鬼)卻嫉妒他,藉著欺騙那頭一批人易信的天真,暗暗把自己的毒藥注入我們的身體,並以某種分裂的不和,將人那原本合一而完全的本性由兩種本質割裂開來:
What more soothing in affection? What more sublime in thought? So that it may evidently appear that He adorned into this body that first-formed man, already then graced with all dignities — nay rather, the condition of His Son, our God, who was to come at the end of the ages for our redemption; to whom, at that time also, He gave paradise under the law of death, as it were a most delightful estate, both beautified with city-charms and planted with rustic growths: which that fore-sower begrudged him, and, by deceiving the credulous newness of the first men, secretly plunged his own poison into our bodies, and, out of two substances, cut apart the single and perfect nature of man by a certain discord of division:
284:29
ut cum nobis una mens esset, id est illa quam germanitas animæ et corporis gignebat, aliam voluntatem per vitiatam naturam contra animam parturiret. Denique et Apostolus ait: Video aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meæ, et captivantem me in lege peccati quæ est in membris meis (Rom, VII). Et alibi: Caro concupiscit 129 adversus spiritum, spiritus autem adversus carnem. Hæc invicem adversantur sibi, ut non quaecunque vultis, illa faciatis (Galat. v). CAP. IV. — Hinc etiam iste noster Conditor, qui vel nos nobis vel mundum pro noDis recerat, a primis illis hominibus offensus maledicta super singulos, prout criminis quantilas exigebat, effudit.
以致,我們原有一個心思——就是那由靈魂與身體之親緣所生的——如今卻藉那敗壞了的本性,生出另一個敵擋靈魂的意志。最後,使徒也說:我覺得肢體中另有個律,和我心中的律交戰,把我擄去,叫我附從那肢體中犯罪的律(羅馬書七章)。他在別處又說:肉體的情慾與聖靈相爭,聖靈也與肉體相爭。這兩個彼此相敵,使你們不能做所願意做的(加拉太書五章)。第四章。——因此,我們這位創造者,就是那位既為我們自己造了我們、又為我們造了世界的主,既被那頭一批人所觸怒,便按各人罪過的輕重,向各人傾倒了咒詛。
so that, whereas we had one mind — that is, the one which the kinship of soul and body begot — it might, through the corrupted nature, bring forth another will against the soul. Finally, the Apostle also says: I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind, and taking me captive in the law of sin which is in my members (Rom. VII). And elsewhere: The flesh lusts against the spirit, but the spirit against the flesh. These are contrary to one another, so that you may not do whatever things you will (Gal. V). CHAPTER IV. — Hence also this our Founder, who had made both us for ourselves and the world for us, offended by those first men, poured out curses upon each one, according as the greatness of the crime required.
284:30
Et quamvis iratus mox tamen mysterium nostrae salutis ut pius pater ostendit. Neque aequum fuerat alio tempore de salutis nostrae remedio cogitare, nisi eo quo mors esset inventa. Sic a prudentioribus prima fronte morti adhibetur medicus, ut capite valetudinis deprehenso, facilius remedium salutare succurrat. Non ergo tunc tantum Dominus ac Salvator noster promissus est, cum clamat Isaias: Ecce virgo in u'ero concipiet et pariet filium (Isai. vn), et tunc cum ad Abraham dictum est i Ad hoc tempus veniam, et erit Saræ filius (Genes. XVIII).
祂雖發怒,卻仍如慈父一般,隨即顯明我們得救的奧祕。在死亡被發現的那一刻之外的任何時候去思想我們救恩的良方,本也不合宜。因此,較為明智的人在死亡剛一發作時便延請醫者,好叫病灶一經查出,那拯救的良藥便更易前來救援。所以,我們的主與救主被應許,並非只在以賽亞呼喊「看哪,必有童女懷孕生子」(以賽亞書七章)之時,也非只在向亞伯拉罕所說「到這時候我必來,撒拉必生一個兒子」(創世記十八章)之時。
And although angered, He nonetheless soon revealed, like a loving father, the mystery of our salvation. Nor would it have been fitting to think of the remedy of our salvation at any other time than that in which death had been discovered. Thus by the more prudent a physician is applied to death at the very first onset, so that, the seat of the sickness being detected, the saving remedy may more easily come to the rescue. Not then only, therefore, was the Lord and our Saviour promised, when Isaiah cries out: Behold, a virgin shall conceive in the womb and shall bear a son (Isa. VII), and then when it was said to Abraham: At this time I will come, and Sarah shall have a son (Gen. XVIII).
284:31
Nam hoc erat pene jam sero, et tanta millia patriarcharum sine spe murtua videbantur, quibus utique vita esse non potuit, si Dominum non speraverunt esse venturum, dicente Apostolo: Spe enim salvi facti sumus. Spes enim quæ videtur, non est spes, sed quæ speratur (Rom. vui). Et l qualis spes esse potuit, si non fuit repromissa? Imo ut primo homini illa sapientior omnibus nestiis bestia mortem sapui, ita oportuit illum Dominum, veram sapientiam, jam tum illo tempore suffragium sapere vitale, quod et fecit. Neque destitit publicare, ne tanta ejus factura, uno inimici ariete propulsata, sine præsidio alicujus lapsui potius, quam decori generata videretur:
因為這時已近乎太遲,那許多千萬的先祖看似毫無盼望地死了;他們若不曾盼望主必要來,實在就不能有生命,正如使徒所說:我們得救是在乎盼望。只是所見的盼望不是盼望,惟有那所盼望的(羅馬書八章)。而這盼望若非事先應許,又怎能存在呢?不如說,正如對那頭一個人而言,那比一切走獸更狡猾的獸使他嘗到死味,照樣那位主、真智慧,就當在那時嘗到那賜生命的救助,這也正是祂所行的。祂並未停止公開此事,免得祂那何等偉大的工作,被仇敵那一根攻城槌所擊退,竟看似毫無護衛、生來乃是為要跌倒而非為著榮美:
For this was now almost late, and so many thousands of patriarchs seemed to have died without hope, for whom there could indeed have been no life, if they had not hoped that the Lord was to come, the Apostle saying: For by hope we were saved. But hope that is seen is not hope; but that which is hoped for (Rom. VIII). And what hope could there be, if it had not been promised beforehand? Nay rather, as for the first man that beast, wiser than all the beasts, savoured death, so it behoved that Lord, the true Wisdom, even then at that time to savour the vital succour, which He also did. Nor did He cease to make it public, lest so great a work of His, driven back by the single battering-ram of the enemy, should seem to have been begotten for a fall rather than for glory, without any protection:
284:32
simul ne et is validior haberetur, qui tantum opus alienae virwtis obruere potuisset, quam ille, si opus suum, quod super omues creaturas ineffabiliter fecit, aut servare non potuisset, aut reparare noluisset. Defendit inquam, ille se hae invidia. Defendit ille noster Conditor ac Redemptor, pariterque se et posse et velle monstravit: quoniam nec virtus potentiae defuit, nec dignatio pietati. Hæc nobis magis adoranda, quod sub ipsa erroris nostri tempestate non substitit, majorque etiam, dum exacerbatur, erupit; dum ubi poenam merebamur, spes redemptionis ostenditur, et, dum in naufragii acerbo discrimine, portus salutis aperitur;
同時免得那能夠傾覆別人如此偉大之能力所成之工的,被算為比祂更強——祂若是不能保守、或不肯修復自己那超乎一切受造物、以無可言喻之方式所成的工。我說,祂為自己辯明,抵擋這責難。祂,我們的創造者與救贖者,為自己辯明,並一同顯明祂既能又願:因為既不缺乏權能的力量,也不缺乏施憐憫的恩慈。這些事更當受我們敬拜,因祂在我們過犯的風暴之下並未止步,反而在受激怒時愈發湧現得更大;因在我們理當受刑之處,卻顯出救贖的盼望,並在船破的苦難危境中,卻開了救恩的港口;
and at the same time lest he should be reckoned stronger, who could have overwhelmed so great a work of another's power, than He, if He had either been unable to preserve, or unwilling to repair, His own work, which He had ineffably made above all creatures. He defended Himself, I say, against this reproach. He, our Founder and Redeemer, defended Himself, and showed alike that He both could and would: since neither was the strength of power lacking, nor the graciousness to His mercy. These things are the more to be adored by us, in that under the very tempest of our error He did not halt, but, when provoked, broke forth even greater; in that where we deserved punishment, the hope of redemption is shown, and, while in the bitter peril of shipwreck, the harbour of salvation is opened;
284:33
ut novo more, quæ materia fuerat iracundiæ, esse cœperit origo clementiæ. a Si arcana operatione manifestans, quod infirmitatem nostram argumentum suæ voluerit esse virtutis, b quantumque nos amaret, dum in ipsum peccavimus, ostenderet, quorum oblivisci etiam post errata non posset: imo quos pretiosius redimeret, « quam fecisset. Quærat nunc humana crudelitas criminosis vel privata erga stuia vel publicas carceres, cum manicis ferreis et duris rigida trabe compedibus irata suspiret, et in pœnas multimodas adinveutionum laxet ingenia; omnisque judex subrecti capitis castitatem propriae mentis discriMine probet alieno, hoc magis amicus atrocitati, quo magis alienus est crimini.
以致以一種新奇的方式,那原是忿怒緣由的,竟開始成了慈憐的源頭。祂藉隱祕的運作顯明:祂願以我們的軟弱作祂自己能力的憑證,並要顯出祂何等愛我們——就在我們得罪祂之時;這些人祂即使在我們過犯之後也不能忘懷,不如說,祂要以比造他們時更寶貴的代價贖回他們。如今任憑人的殘忍為有罪之人尋出私設的刑罰或公設的牢獄,任憑它含怒地帶著鐵鐐與堅硬的桎梏在僵硬的刑架上嘆息,並放縱其巧思去發明各樣的刑罰;任憑每個審判官以他人昂首受死的危境去證明自己心思的貞潔——他愈與罪惡無份,反倒愈與殘暴為友。
so that, in a new manner, that which had been the matter of wrath began to be the source of clemency. If, by a hidden working, He was making manifest that He willed our infirmity to be the proof of His own power, and would show how greatly He loved us, even while we sinned against Him, whom He could not forget even after our errors — nay rather, whom He would redeem more preciously than He had made. Let human cruelty now seek out for the guilty either private punishments or public prisons, and, wrathful, sigh with iron manacles and hard fetters upon the rigid beam, and let loose its ingenuity in devising punishments of many kinds; and let every judge prove the chastity of his own mind by the peril of another's uplifted head — the more a friend to atrocity, the more he is a stranger to crime.
284:34
Ipsi enim solent, truculentiores esse in reos, qui suni a reatu puriores. Hi studiosius maleficia, vel criminosorum contagia persequentes, quominus ac negligentius facinorum vitavere consortia. 0 miseros et omni praeditos cæcitate, qui bonum exornant malo, qui continentiam sub gestu crudelitatis d attollunt, et crudelitatem propriam aliena infelicitate 130 commendant, quando virtutibus suis miserorum astipulantur exitio, et innocentiæ judicantis noxiorum cruciamenta supplaudunt. CAP., V.
因為那些對罪愆愈潔淨無染的人,反倒慣於對被告愈發兇殘。這等人愈是熱心追究惡行,或追究罪犯的沾染,就愈少、愈疏忽地避開與惡行的交往。哦,那些擁有各樣瞎眼的可憐人哪,他們以惡妝點善,在殘忍的姿態下高舉節制,並藉他人的不幸來稱許自己的殘忍——當他們以自己的德行為那可憐人的滅亡助勢時,並在審判者的無辜之下,為有罪之人的酷刑喝彩。第五章。
For those very men are wont to be more truculent toward the accused who are the purer from guilt. These, more zealously pursuing evildoings, or the contagion of criminals, have the less and the more negligently avoided fellowship with wicked deeds. O wretched men, endowed with every blindness, who adorn good with evil, who exalt continence under the guise of cruelty, and commend their own cruelty by another's misery — when by their own virtues they lend support to the destruction of the wretched, and, in the innocence of the judge, applaud the torments of the guilty. CHAPTER V.
284:35
Deus autem noster contra omnem spem, contra omnem pene fidem ex divitiis misericordiæ suæ in malo bonum nactus, in iracundia generans confirmansque pietatem, peccandi semen in fructum voluit evadere miserandi; et qui nos propter transgressionem perdere debuisset, propter suam misericordiam reparaturum se esse promisit. Et illo tempore quo supplicia merebamur, argumentum salvationis ostendit: ut intelligere possemus quantum valeret præstare non laus, qui tantum donaret iratos.
——但我們的神,出人一切所望、幾乎超乎一切所信之外,從祂憐憫的豐富中在惡裡尋得了善,在忿怒中生出並堅立了憐恤,願意那犯罪的種子結出憐憫的果子;那本當因我們的過犯而滅絕我們的主,卻因祂自己的憐憫,應許要恢復我們。並且正在我們理當受刑之時,祂顯出救恩的憑證:好叫我們能明白,這位在人被激怒之時尚且施予如此之多的主,當祂不被稱頌之時,還將施予何等之多。
— But our God, against all hope, against almost all belief, out of the riches of His mercy finding good in evil, begetting and confirming pity in wrath, willed the seed of sinning to issue in the fruit of compassion; and He who ought to have destroyed us on account of our transgression, promised, on account of His own mercy, that He would restore us. And at that very time when we deserved punishments, He showed the proof of salvation: that we might be able to understand how much He would avail to bestow when not praised, who bestowed so much upon those who were angered.
284:36
In primo ergo homine, ut loquebatur, statim nobis judiciarium spopondit auxilium, statim de bono thesaure bona produxit, statim ignotos ipsis angelis sacramentum quod implendum esset in novissimo tempore, publicavit, et terreno Adæ Adam promisit e cœlo. Nam cum serpentem pro merito suo maledicto fulminaret, jubet eum terram prO cibo habere, super ventrem repere; et quoniam mortem illam ipse fecisset, addidit dicens: Et ponam inimicitias inter te et mulierem, et inter semen tuum et semen mulieris. Ipsa culcabit caput tuum, e et tu eju observabis calcaneum (Genes. III). Nonne consideras, nonne conspicis, quod eidem tunc minabatur in Christo?
因此,在那頭一個人身上,正如祂所說的,祂立時向我們應許了審判性的救助,立時從那美善的庫房中拿出美善之物,立時把那連天使自己也不知曉、要在末後的時候應驗的聖事公開出來,並向屬地的亞當應許了一位從天而來的亞當。因為當祂按蛇所當受的以咒詛擊打牠時,祂吩咐牠以土為食,用肚子行走;並因牠自己造成了那死亡,祂又加上說:我要叫你和女人彼此為仇,你的後裔和女人的後裔也彼此為仇。她要傷你的頭,你要窺伺她的腳跟(創世記三章)。你豈不思想,你豈不看明,祂那時在基督裡向這同一位所發的威嚇嗎?
In the first man, therefore, as He spoke, He at once promised us judicial help, at once brought forth good things out of the good treasure, at once made public the sacrament, unknown even to the angels themselves, which was to be fulfilled in the last time, and to the earthly Adam He promised an Adam from heaven. For when He struck the serpent with a curse for its deserving, He bids it have the earth for food, and creep upon its belly; and since it had itself wrought that death, He added, saying: And I will put enmities between you and the woman, and between your seed and the seed of the woman. She shall tread upon your head, and you shall watch for her heel (Gen. III). Do you not consider, do you not perceive, what He then threatened against the same one in Christ?
284:37
Aliud enim semen mulieris nullum prorsus accipio nisi illud quod Apostolus ait: Factum es muliere, factum ex carne (Galat. XIV); iltad quod ut evangelista (Luc. III) ait: Josephfilius putabatur esse, sed non erat illud utique, quod Verbum caro factum est (Joan. i). Nam si generandi publicam istam et naturalem circumspicimus rationem, semina non habent mulieres; deMque nulla concipit sine viro, ac per hoc, quoniam jam tunc in Adam semen bumanae generationis esset transgressione vitiatum, semen coeleste promiUitur, ut Apostolus sentit non ex corruptione viri, sed ex Deo:
因為我所理解的女人的後裔,絕非別的,惟有使徒所說的那一位:為女人所生,為肉身所成(加拉太書四章);就是福音書作者所說(路加福音三章)約瑟被認為是他的父親、其實不然的那一位——那實在是道成了肉身的那一位(約翰福音一章)。因為我們若察看那生育的普遍而自然的常理,女人並無種子;再者,沒有一個女人是不藉著男人而懷孕的;因此,既然那時人類生育的種子在亞當裡已因過犯而敗壞了,就有一顆屬天的種子被應許,正如使徒所領會的,不是出於男人的敗壞,乃是出於神:
For no seed of the woman do I at all understand except that of which the Apostle says: Made of a woman, made of flesh (Gal. IV); that of which, as the Evangelist says (Luke III), Joseph was thought to be the father, but was not — that, indeed, which was the Word made flesh (John I). For if we consider that common and natural manner of begetting, women do not have seeds; finally, none conceives without a man, and through this, since even then in Adam the seed of human generation was corrupted by transgression, a heavenly seed is promised, as the Apostle holds, not from the corruption of a man, but from God:
284:38
T quod cum caro fieret in muliere, etiam elementa illa corporeae substantiæ, id est humoris et sanguinis in ipso sibi vasculo in quo ipsa elementa sita sunt, naturaliter aptaret. Mater itaque Domini nostri Jesu Christi in illa jam tunc muliere promissa est. g Hæc Inimicitiis opposita est serpentis: Ponam, inquit, inimicitias inler te et mulierem (Genes. III); non certe pono dicit, ne ad Evam hoc pertinere videretur. Verbum promissionis est, quod transmittitur in futura. Ponam, inquit, inimicitias inter te et mulierem: h illam utique mulierem quae Salvatorem parturiat, non quae generet fratricidam.
這種子在女人裡成為肉身時,也就自然地把身體本質的那些元素——就是水分與血——在那些元素所在的那同一器皿之中,配合於自己。因此,我們主耶穌基督的母親,早在那時就在那女人身上被應許了。她被置於與蛇為仇的地位:祂說,我要叫你和女人彼此為仇(創世記三章);祂當然不說「我已叫」,免得看似指向夏娃。這是應許之言,是傳向將來之事的。祂說,我要叫你和女人彼此為仇:無疑就是那要生下救主、而非那生下弒兄者的女人。
which, when it became flesh in the woman, would also naturally fit to itself those elements of bodily substance — that is, of moisture and blood — in that very vessel in which those very elements are placed. The Mother, therefore, of our Lord Jesus Christ was promised even then in that woman. She was set in enmity against the serpent: I will put, He says, enmities between you and the woman (Gen. III); certainly He does not say I put, lest it should seem to pertain to Eve. It is a word of promise, which is transmitted into things future. I will put, He says, enmities between you and the woman: that woman, assuredly, who should bring forth the Saviour, not who should beget a fratricide.
284:39
Ponam, inquit, inimicitius inter te et mulierem, quae, repudiata facilitate credendi, non solum te non audiat, si aut suavitatem pomorum pro adaperitione monstraveris oculorum, aut diis similem esse promiseris; sed etiam ipso Gabriele deferente verbum, rationem de pro. missionis exigat novitate, dicendo: Quemad modum erit istud, quoniam virum non cognovi (Luc. i)? Illam utique, quam ad visionem angelii pudor aureus tremefecit, fidei tamen ardor et constatia labi nesciam, ad inquirendam rationem reddidit audacem, et que advenienti praestitit de pudore, quod tacuerit, hæc promittenti de admiratione non cessit. Nam et sollicita de eo quod annuntiabatur exquisivit.
祂說:「我要把仇恨放在你和女人之間」(創三)——這女人已然摒棄了輕信的傾向,甚至不肯聽你的話,縱使你向她顯出果子的甘美作為開眼的手段,或應許她要如神一般;不但如此,即使加百列親自把話傳給她,她仍要為那應許之新奇尋求一個緣由,說:「這事怎能成就?因為我沒有出嫁。」(路一)她在天使的異象前,確曾因那金子般的貞潔羞怯而戰兢,卻因信德的熱忱與那不曉得跌倒的堅定,被激勵得大膽去探究其緣由;她以緘默向那來到者獻上羞澀的敬意,卻沒有因驚異而向那作應許者停止她的詢問。因為她心中掛念,便細細探問那向她宣告的事。
'I will put enmities,' He says, 'between thee and the woman' (Gen. 3) — a woman who, having renounced all readiness to believe too easily, would not so much as hearken to thee, even shouldest thou display the sweetness of the apples as a means of opening the eyes, or promise that she should become like unto the gods; nay, even when Gabriel himself bore the word to her, she would demand a reason for the newness of the promise, saying: 'How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?' (Luke 1). She indeed, whom at the vision of the angel a golden modesty set trembling, was yet by the ardor of faith and by a constancy that knows no falling made bold to seek out the reason; and she who by her silence rendered to the one arriving the tribute of modesty, did not, out of wonder, withhold from the one making the promise her inquiry. For she was anxious, and searched out that which was being announced.
284:40
Denique et angelus non infidelitatem redarguit, ut in Zacharia, 131 sed instituit de divinae operationis novitate dicens: Spiritus sanctus superveniet in te, et virtus Al. tissimi obumbrabit tibi ( Luc. i). Ecce istud semen mulieris, quod non per traducem genitaliuni ministeriorum commixtione sexus utriusque infunderetur in uterum, sed claustro clauso i indefloratæ virginis inveniretur in utero. Denique rem novam plenamque miraculi, novo verbo propbeta dum promittit, exsequitur: Ecce virgo in utero concipiet, et pariet filium (Isai. vu). Quotidie certe de procreandi necessitate et cernimus et audimus; de nulla tamen dicitur: in utero concepit:
最後,天使也沒有像對撒迦利亞那樣責備她的不信,反而教導她關於神聖工作的新奇,說:「聖靈要臨到你身上,至高者的能力要蔭庇你。」(路一)看哪,這就是女人的後裔,牠不是藉著兩性交合、透過生育器官的傳承注入母腹的,而是要在一位未受玷污的童貞女腹中被尋見,她的內室依然緊閉。於是先知以新的話語應許那新奇而滿有奇蹟的事,並宣佈說:「看哪,必有童貞女懷孕生子。」(賽七)我們日日在生育的必然中既看見也聽見;然而卻沒有一人被說是「在腹中懷了孕」。
Finally, the angel too did not rebuke her for unbelief, as he did in the case of Zacharias, but instructed her concerning the newness of the divine working, saying: 'The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow thee' (Luke 1). Behold that seed of the woman, which was not to be poured into the womb through the succession of generative offices by the intermingling of the two sexes, but was to be found in the womb of an undeflowered virgin, her cloister remaining closed. And so the prophet, while promising in a new word a thing new and full of miracle, sets it forth: 'Behold, a virgin shall conceive in the womb, and shall bring forth a son' (Isa. 7). Assuredly, day by day, in the necessity of begetting, we both see and hear; yet of none is it said, 'she conceived in the womb.'
284:41
quoniam substantia futuri hominis fusa per virum coalescit in femina, uterusquemuljeris non principium nascituri hominis, sed depositi nutrimentum. Maria autem non tam prima quam sola in utero concepit, et cujus pudoris illibatio conceptum uteri sine damno virginitatis expressit: quæ sola nobis peperit, quod non accepit ex nobis, dicente Domino: Vos de inferioribus estis, ego de supernis sum (Joan. VIII). Quæ sola mater est filio, cum virgo sit marito; cujus conceptionem ignorante virginitate partus agnovit; quæ sola mulier dicta est non concipiendo, sed pariendo.
因為那將要成為之人的本質,藉著男子傾注,在女子裡凝聚成長,而女子的腹並非那將要出生之人的源頭,乃是所寄存者的養料。然而馬利亞在腹中懷孕,與其說是頭一位,不如說是唯一一位如此的;她那毫無虧損的貞潔,成就了腹中的懷孕而不損及童貞——唯獨她為我們生出了她並非從我們領受的,正如主所說:「你們是從下頭來的,我是從上頭來的。」(約八)唯獨她既是丈夫的童貞女,又是兒子的母親;她的懷孕連她的童貞都不曉得,那出生卻認出了它;唯獨她被稱為女人,不是因懷孕,乃是因生產。
For the substance of the man that is to be, poured forth through the man, grows together in the woman, and the womb of the woman is not the origin of the man about to be born, but the nourishment of that which is deposited there. But Mary conceived in the womb not so much as the first, but as the only one to do so; and the unimpaired state of her modesty brought forth a conception of the womb without loss of virginity — she who alone bore for us that which she did not receive from us, as the Lord says: 'Ye are from beneath, I am from above' (John 8). She who alone is a mother to her son, though she be a virgin to her husband; whose conceiving her virginity did not know, yet the birth acknowledged; who alone is called a woman not by conceiving, but by bearing.
284:42
Ex hac erao semen promissum est mulieris, quod secundum hominem Dominus Deus noster est, qui non infusus est in utero, sed inventus, evangelista confirmante, cum dicit de Maria: Inventa est in utero habens (Matth. I)i Ecoe et ab ipso praecedente prophetae sermone non deviat, quod fuerat nuntiatum: Virgo in utero concipiet; eed iD mysterii novitate sermonis etiam parilitate concordat, eoque stylo facti historia designatur, k quo faciendum denuntiat. Et propheta ait Isaias: Virgo in utero concipiet; Matthæus refert: Inventa est in utero habens (Ibid.).
如此,從她所應許的乃是女人的後裔,這後裔按其人性乃是主我們的神,牠不是被注入腹中,而是在其中被尋見,正如福音書作者論到馬利亞時所證實的:「就發現她在腹中有孕。」(太一)看哪,所宣告的事並未偏離先前那位先知的話語:「必有童貞女懷孕」;不但如此,即使在奧祕的新奇中,這話語也在相同的意思上彼此吻合,且以同一筆調記載了那已成的史實,正如它預告那將要成就之事的筆調。先知以賽亞說:「必有童貞女懷孕」;馬太記載:「就發現她在腹中有孕。」(同上)
From her, then, was promised the seed of the woman, who according to His manhood is the Lord our God, who was not poured into the womb but found there, as the evangelist confirms when he says of Mary: 'She was found with child in the womb' (Matt. 1). Behold, that which had been announced does not depart from the very word of the preceding prophet: 'A virgin shall conceive in the womb'; but even in the newness of the mystery it agrees with the like sense of the wording, and by that same style is the history of the deed set down by which it foretold what was to be done. And the prophet Isaiah says: 'A virgin shall conceive in the womb'; Matthew reports: 'She was found with child in the womb' (ibid.).
284:43
Verbo ipso promissionis respondet effectus, quod non aliter loquitur evangelista quam vates, nec ad exprimendam operis novitatem inventæ elocutionis difficultate confunditur. Ubi sunt grammatici? Ubi consiliatii ? Quae istos, ut extra consuetudinem loquantur, schola produxit? a quæ tam aperte signatæ novitatem monstravit doctrinae? b Non indicant humano sensu quoniam non opus humanum est, quod loquuntur. « Et tamen rem novam nec antea factam sic notant, ut intelligas cum mirabili opere et mirabilem natum esse sermonem. Repetamus denique sanctas feminas patriarcharum, videamusque si sic de aliqua scriptum est. Legimus de Sara: Et Dominus visitavit Saram, sicut dixit.
那果效正應驗了應許之言,因為福音書作者所言與先知所言毫無二致,他也未曾因難以尋得言辭來表達那事的新奇而陷於困惑。文法家在哪裡?謀士在哪裡?是哪所學校培育出這些人,叫他們說出超乎慣常用法的話?哪一位教師如此公然地顯明這被封印之教義的新奇?他們所說的並非出於人的心思,因為那不是人的工作。然而,一件新奇且前所未有的事,他們卻如此標記,好叫你明白:與那奇妙的作為一同,被生出的話語也是奇妙的。那麼,讓我們回顧列祖的聖潔婦人,看看是否有哪一位被如此記載。我們讀到論撒拉的話:「耶和華照著所說的眷顧撒拉。」
The effect answers to the very word of the promise, in that the evangelist speaks no otherwise than the seer, nor is he thrown into confusion by any difficulty of finding words to express the newness of the deed. Where are the grammarians? Where are the counsellors? What school produced these men, that they should speak beyond common usage? What master showed forth so openly the newness of a doctrine thus sealed? They do not declare by human sense that which they speak, because it is no human work. And yet a thing new and never before done they so note that thou mayest understand that, together with the marvellous deed, marvellous also was the word begotten. Let us then go back over the holy women of the patriarchs, and see whether it is so written of any of them. We read of Sarah: 'And the Lord visited Sarah, as He had said.'
284:44
Et fecit Deus Sarae, sicut locutus est ei, et concepit, et peperit Abrahæ filium (Genes. XXI). In Isaac divina benevolentia monstratur his verbis: Et exaudivit illum Deus, et concepit Rebecca uxor ejus (Genes. XL). Denique et de Jacob uxoribos sic ponitur: Et concepit Lia, et peperit filium Jacob (Genes. XXIX), etc. De nulla certe harum scriptum est, in utero concepit, quæ tamen quidquid concipiebant, extra utemm concipere non poterant, sed quoniam de conventu virili concipere se noverant, quibus d non proveniebat salva virginilate conceptus; sola vero Maria in utero concepit, cum irreserato aditu seminali, clauso utero concepit.
「神照著所應許撒拉的話待她,撒拉就懷孕,給亞伯拉罕生了一個兒子。」(創二十一)論到以撒,神的恩眷藉這些話顯明:「神應允了他,他的妻子利百加就懷了孕。」(創二十五)接著論到雅各的妻子也同樣記載:「利亞懷孕,給雅各生了一個兒子」(創二十九)等等。這些婦人中,確實沒有一位被記為「在腹中懷孕」,雖然她們所懷的都不可能在腹外懷成;只因她們曉得自己是從與男子交合而懷孕,對她們而言懷孕不可能在保有童貞的情形下臨到;唯獨馬利亞在腹中懷孕,那時她的生殖之門未曾開啟、腹門緊閉,卻懷了孕。
'And God did unto Sarah as He had spoken to her, and she conceived and bore Abraham a son' (Gen. 21). In the case of Isaac, the divine favor is shown by these words: 'And God heard him, and Rebecca his wife conceived' (Gen. 25). Then likewise it is set down of the wives of Jacob: 'And Leah conceived, and bore Jacob a son' (Gen. 29), and so forth. Of none of these, assuredly, is it written 'she conceived in the womb,' though whatever they conceived they could not conceive outside the womb; but because they knew themselves to conceive from the embrace of a man, to whom conception did not come with virginity preserved; whereas Mary alone conceived in the womb, when, with the seminal entrance unopened and the womb closed, she conceived.
284:45
Ad hujus conceptionis semen, si recte ratiocinabimur, et interius divina tractaverimus, præcessit in figura pro tempore illa sententia, quæ primogenita benedictionibus vel obligationibus obligavit, dicente Domino: Omne masculinum quod aperit vulvam, sanctum 132 Domino vocabitur ( Exod. XIII). Quod esi istud masculinum quod aperit vulvam, cum omnium feminarum vulvas aperiat non puerperii necessitas, sed maritalis agnitio. Denique nulla virgo dicitur post maritum, quod nomen clausum videtur futuris mysteriis convenire. Et superius de Rachel Scripturam habere monstravimus: Et exaudivit illam Deus, et aperuit ejus vulvam, et concepit. Certe non prius dixit, concepit, et post aperuit ejus vulvam;
對於這懷孕的種子,若我們正確地推理,並在內裡默想神聖之事,就會發現在時候上有一句話作為預表先行,那話用祝福或義務約束了頭生的,正如主所說:「凡頭生的男子都要稱為聖,歸於耶和華。」(出十三)但這「開母腹的男子」是甚麼意思呢?因為使眾婦人母腹開啟的並非生育的必然,乃是婚姻中的認識。的確,沒有婦人在有了丈夫之後仍被稱為童貞女——這名稱似乎正合那將要來的奧祕。我們在前面已指出經上論拉結說:「神應允了她,開了她的胎(母腹),她就懷了孕。」它斷不是先說「她懷了孕」,然後才說「祂開了她的胎」;
To the seed of this conception, if we reason rightly and handle the divine things inwardly, there went before in figure, for its time, that sentence which bound the firstborn with blessings or with obligations, the Lord saying: 'Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord' (Exod. 13). But what is this 'male that openeth the womb,' since it is not the necessity of childbearing that opens the wombs of all women, but the marital act of knowing? Indeed, no one is called a virgin after her husband — a name which seems fitting to the mysteries yet to come. And above we have shown that the Scripture says of Rachel: 'And God heard her, and opened her womb, and she conceived.' Certainly it did not first say 'she conceived,' and afterward 'He opened her womb';
284:46
Med prius aperuit: videlicet, ut maritus apertis vulvae januis, velut seminaturus agrum aratum seminibus intraret. Denique subjungit, et concepit. Non itaque partu, sed conceptione; imo conceptio patefacta est; nec illam parturiendus dum nascitur, sed qui parturiendum seminaturus fuerat, designavit. Et si jam ante conceptum, quippe ut conciperet, reserata est, non eam certe ille qui natus est, diu poterat reserare, dum dicitur nasciturus, qui etiam concipi dum esset illa clausa non potuit: Omne masculinum, inqait, quod aperit vulvam, sanctum Domino vocabitur (Luc. n). Quæ est ista ratio, quae nec secundum sensum videtur impleta?
而是先開了它:也就是說,好叫丈夫在胎門已開之後,能如同要把種子撒在耕過之田的人一般進入。接著它補充說:「她就懷了孕。」如此看來,這不是藉著生產,而是藉著懷孕;不但如此,乃是那懷孕得以顯明;它所指的並非那正在出生的嬰孩,而是那要撒種、生出那將要出生者的人。倘若在懷孕之前——的確是為了叫她能懷孕——那胎已被開啟,那麼那出生的斷不能長久地開啟它,因為那被說要出生的,在她緊閉時連被懷上都不可能:「凡頭生的男子」,它說,「都要稱為聖,歸於耶和華。」(路二)這是甚麼樣的道理呢?連按字面的意思似乎都未曾應驗?
but it first opened it: that is to say, so that the husband, the doors of the womb having been opened, might enter like one about to sow a ploughed field with seed. Then it adds, 'and she conceived.' And so it was not by the bringing forth, but by the conceiving; nay rather, the conception was disclosed; and it designated not the one to be born as he is being born, but him who was to sow the one about to be born. And if the womb was unbarred even before the conception — indeed, in order that she might conceive — assuredly he who was born could not for long unbar it, since he is said to be about to be born who could not even be conceived while she was closed: 'Every male,' it says, 'that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord' (Luke 2). What is this reasoning, which does not seem even according to the plain sense to be fulfilled?
284:47
Jacob primi locum fratris fraudulenter invadit, nec nascendi ordine prohibetur, nec dolositate damnatur. Joseph filii per avum præpostera secundum nascendi gradum bencdictione signantur; nec cæcitas erat futura prospicicntis, nec monitor filius dexteram parentis, quæ pinguioris beBedictionis succo e minorem irrigabat, inflexit. Quæ utique omnia sunt contraria, si putamus de his dictum esse: Omne masculinum quod ' aperit vulvam, qui de virili semine primi nascuntur ex feminis. Sed quoniam aliud interius habet illa sententia, ideo istiusmodi primtivi cedunt, et benedictiones perdunt.
雅各以詭詐奪取了他頭生兄長的地位,卻既不因出生的次序被攔阻,也不因其詭計被定罪。約瑟的兒子們被他們的祖父以與出生次序相反的祝福所印記;然而那預見者並非眼瞎,那出言提醒的兒子也未能扳回他父親的右手,那手正將較豐盛之祝福的汁液澆灌在年幼的身上。倘若我們以為這句「凡開母腹的男子」是論到這些人——就是憑男子的種子從婦人頭一個生出的人——那麼這一切都與理相悖。但因為那句話裡另有含義,所以這一類的初熟之物便退讓,並失去了祝福。
Jacob fraudulently seizes the place of his firstborn brother, yet is neither hindered by the order of birth nor condemned for his craftiness. The sons of Joseph are marked by their grandfather with a blessing preposterous as to the degree of birth; yet it was not blindness in the one who foresaw, nor did the son who warned bend the right hand of his parent, which was watering the younger with the juice of a richer blessing. All of which things are surely contrary to reason, if we suppose that of these it was said, 'Every male that openeth the womb' — those who are born first from women by the seed of a man. But because that sentence holds another meaning within, therefore these firstfruits of this kind give way and lose their blessings.
284:48
Jesse filius David non primus, aut secundus, aut tertius, sed omnium ultimos ungitur a propheta, et despicabilior cunctis eligitur in regem. Nec illi primo aot secundo contra David sententia legis de primitivig promulgata blanditur, quia judicasset utique maximos, si ab his matrum vulvas judicasset aperiri: quando hoc utiqne, aut in qua dicimus impletum, quod utique non poterat non impleri. Quæ est ista cujus vulvam fetus reserat f non maritus ? Quæ virgo concipit quæ non ut conciperes virgo esse desiit? Non certe illa de qua Scriptura dicit: Cognovit Adam uxorem suam, et peperit ei filium (Genes. IV); sed illa de qua evangelista signat:
耶西的兒子大衛,既非長子,也非次子或三子,乃是眾子中最末的,卻被先知膏立,且雖是眾人中最不足取的,仍被揀選為王。那頒佈關於初熟之物的律法之言,也不曾偏袒那頭一個或第二個兒子過於大衛;因為若它判定他們的母腹是由這些人開的,它必定會判定他們為最尊大的:然而,我們說這事究竟在誰身上、或在哪種情形下應驗了——那件斷不能不應驗的事?誰是那由後裔而非丈夫開其母腹的?哪一位童貞女懷孕卻沒有為了懷孕而不再是童貞女?斷不是那位經上論及的:「亞當認識了他的妻子,她就給他生了一個兒子」(創四);乃是那位福音書作者所標明的:(下段續)
Jesse's son David, neither first, nor second, nor third, but last of all, is anointed by the prophet, and though the most contemptible of them all, is chosen to be king. Nor does the sentence of the law promulgated concerning the firstfruits flatter that first or second son against David; for surely it would have judged the greatest of them, had it judged that by these the wombs of their mothers were opened: whereas, in whom or in what case do we say it was fulfilled — that which surely could not but be fulfilled? Who is she whose womb the offspring, not the husband, unbars? What virgin conceives who did not cease to be a virgin in order to conceive? Certainly not she of whom Scripture says: 'Adam knew his wife, and she bore him a son' (Gen. 4); but she of whom the evangelist marks:
284:49
Et non vognovit eam Joseph, donec peperit filium (Matth. I). Igitur in Maria hoc sine aubitatione perfectum est, cujus vulvam « non deflorator virginitatis aperuit, sed partus effusus, quae virgo peperit, quae virgo concepit, quae prius mater facta est quam maritata. De hac istud masculinum, quod vere sanctum vocandum esset, exiit; quique vulvam secUndum promissionem partus editus, non secundum consuetudinem naturamque communem, dum concipitur viri semine, reseravit. CAP. VI. — Sed quoniam divites Dei sensus velociter explicare non possumus, tantis se scripturarum mot bus ad unam speciem opponentibus, ut lassari sit facilius quam evadi:
「只是沒有和她同房,等她生了兒子。」(太一)所以在馬利亞身上,這事無疑地成全了:她的母腹沒有被任何損毀童貞的事所開啟,乃是被那湧流而出的生產所開——她以童貞女的身分生產,以童貞女的身分懷孕,在成為妻子之前便先作了母親。那真正當稱為聖的男子從她而出;祂開了母腹,乃是按著應許被生出的,並非按著平常的慣例與本性——當一個嬰孩由男子的種子而懷成之時。第六章——但因我們無法迅速地展開神那豐富的意義,聖經的湧流是何等浩大,都朝著一個要點聚集,以致人容易疲乏過於容易脫身:(下段續)
'And Joseph knew her not, until she had brought forth a son' (Matt. 1). Therefore in Mary this was without doubt perfected: whose womb no deflowering of virginity unbarred, but the birth poured forth — she who as a virgin bore, who as a virgin conceived, who was made a mother before she was made a wife. From her went forth that male which was truly to be called holy; and he unbarred the womb as a birth brought out according to promise, not according to common custom and nature when it is conceived by the seed of a man. CHAP. VI. — But since we cannot swiftly unfold the rich meanings of God, so great being the movements of the Scriptures that array themselves against a single point, so that it is easier to be wearied than to escape:
284:50
quando omnis scriptora cunctorum sensuum unus trames sit, quem humano sermone decurrere quis valebit, nec si angelicas pennas mortalium linguis spiritus ascribat: redire ad propositum convenit, et parvo navigio non 133 in altum vela configere, ne in periculum currat audacia, sed pro infirmitatis solatio in conspectu littoris navigare, ut si quid formidinis oriatur, vel spes sit facile teneri posse quod cernitur. Dicebamus semen mulieris Dominum sanctum, quia secundum carnem patrem hominem non haberet, eumque iam infestum esse serpenti, quem in utero virginis Dei Spiritus, b non materialis generasset humor. Denique quod sequitur, majorem ab homine virginis producit effectum:
既然全部聖經乃是其一切意義的單一軌道,有誰能有力量以人的言語沿之奔馳——不,縱使聖靈把天使的翅膀賦予必死之人的舌頭也不能——那麼合宜的是返回我們的主題,以一葉小舟不向深海張帆,免得膽量陷入危境,反倒為安慰我們的軟弱,在望得見岸的地方航行,好叫若有任何懼怕興起,至少還有指望能輕易握住所看見的。我們曾說女人的後裔就是那聖潔的主,因為按肉體祂沒有人作父親,而祂已然與那蛇為敵——祂是由神的靈、而非物質的體液,在童貞女腹中所生的。接著所記的,從童貞女帶出比從男子更大的果效:(下段續)
since all Scripture is a single track of all its meanings, which who shall be strong enough to run along in human speech — no, not even if the Spirit should ascribe angelic wings to the tongues of mortals — it is fitting to return to our purpose, and with a little vessel not to spread sails toward the deep, lest daring should run into peril, but, for the solace of our weakness, to sail within sight of the shore, so that if any fear should arise, there may at least be hope that what is seen can easily be laid hold of. We were saying that the seed of the woman is the holy Lord, because according to the flesh He would have no man for a father, and that He is already hostile to the serpent, whom the Spirit of God, not a material moisture, had begotten in the virgin's womb. Then that which follows brings forth from the virgin an effect greater than from a man:
284:51
ipsa tuum calcabit caput (Genes. III). Quis ambigit quod præter Dominum nostrum caput serpentis nemo calcavit; ipse enim solus super dracones et scorpiones ambolavit; ipsam captivam duxit captivitatem: et tu ejus calcabis calcaneum, ad quem alium credimus pertinere? Calcaneus quidem pars extrema vestigii est. Et Dominus post ioannis baptismum, Dost dierum quadraginta iejunium. cum ab eodem serpente tentatur, tertiae illus dolositatis jam victor exclamat: Vade retro post me, Satana (Matth. IV). Quid aliud nisi a tergo positum vel reictum, jubet suum observare calcaneum?
「她要傷你的頭。」(創三)誰能疑惑,除了我們的主以外,無人踐踏過蛇的頭?因為唯有祂行走在龍與蠍子之上;祂親自擄掠了那些擄掠人的:「你要傷祂的腳跟」——除祂以外,我們還信這話是指誰呢?腳跟乃是足跡最末的部分。主在約翰的洗禮之後、四十日禁食之後,當祂被那同一條蛇試探時,作為第三次詭計的得勝者呼喊說:「撒但,退到我後邊去!」(太四)祂所命令的,豈非要那被置於或被逐到後面的撒但,去看守祂的腳跟嗎?
'She herself shall bruise thy head' (Gen. 3). Who doubts that, save our Lord, no one has trodden upon the head of the serpent? For He alone has walked upon dragons and scorpions; He Himself has led captivity captive: 'and thou shalt bruise His heel' — to what other do we believe this to pertain? The heel indeed is the extreme part of the footstep. And the Lord, after the baptism of John, after the fast of forty days, when He is tempted by the same serpent, as victor over that third piece of craft cries out: 'Get thee behind me, Satan' (Matt. 4). What else does He command but that Satan, being placed or cast behind, should watch His heel?
284:52
Hæc supra dixi, et inde ad hoc nes ipsa deduxit oratio, qUod homo ille interior cum cogitat non m hoc mundo, sed supra ipsum mundum, cum illo opiftce rerum ac suo vivere videtur, dicente David: Beati qui scrutantur testimonia ejus (Psal. XI), ut pene hoe sit, si fas est dici, Deum fieri, divina meditari; illum Dominum nostrum salutis nostrae jam tunc prodidisse mystee rium; unde in psalmis aii: In capite libri scriptum est de me (Psal. XXXIX). Caput libri est Geneseos principium, qaoniam omnis Scriptura unus est liber, et unus, de quo scriptum est, Deus, et his tam promissionem de ipso esse videmus in capite, et caput vitae nostrae spes est, et ideo capo' libri vitalis spes facta per Deum.
這些事我在前面說過,這番講論也把我們從那裡引到此處:內裡的人,當他所思念的不是這世界,而是超乎這世界本身之上時,似乎與那萬物的創造者一同生活,如同與自己一同生活,正如大衛所說:「查考祂法度的有福了。」(詩一一九)以致——若容許這樣說——這幾乎就是成為神:默想神聖之事;且我們的主早在那時便已顯明我們得救的奧祕;因此祂在詩篇中說:「經卷上記載著論到我的事。」(詩四十)經卷的起頭就是創世記的開端,因為全部聖經乃是一卷書,而所記載的那一位——神——也是一位;如此我們看見論到祂的應許正在最起頭,而我們生命的頭就是盼望,因此在經卷的起頭,藉著神,成就了那賜生命的盼望。
These things I said above, and the discourse itself has led us thence to this: that the inner man, when he thinks not of this world but above this very world, seems to live with that Maker of things as with his own, as David says, 'Blessed are they that search out His testimonies' (Ps. 118) — so that it is almost this, if it be lawful to say it, to become God: to meditate on divine things; and that He, our Lord, already then made known the mystery of our salvation; whence in the Psalms He says: 'In the head of the book it is written of me' (Ps. 39). The head of the book is the beginning of Genesis, since all Scripture is one book, and one is He of whom it is written, God; and thus we see the promise concerning Him to be even at the very head, and the head of our life is hope, and therefore in the head of the book was made, through God, the vital hope.
284:53
Illum, inquam, ut sæpe diximus conditorem, senescente jam mundo, quod in prima mundi ætate promiserat, praestitisse. Unde propheta ait: Virga tua et baculus tuus: ipsa me consolata sunt (Psal. xxIIj. Virga mater est Domini, ex qua bacalus iste, fesso jam per aetatem mundo, qui eum sustentaret, exiit. Illum ergo in virginis uterum delapsum, ut redemptionis nostræ totam bistoriam retexamus partu effectum hominem se exhibuisse pro homine, et creaturam suam de Creatore fecisse. Illum formam. servi accepisse, sed se exinanisse potestatis voluntate, non natura deitatis, per quam non poterat non esse, quod fuerat. Illum maledicta pro salutaribus me-. ruisse miraculis.
我說的正是祂——那位創立者,如我們常說的——如今世界已然衰老,祂便賜下了祂在世界起初之時所應許的。因此先知說:「你的杖,你的竿,都安慰我。」(詩二十三)那杖就是主的母親,那竿由此而出,好扶持這已因年歲而困乏的世界。所以祂降臨滑入童貞女的腹中——好叫我們重新織就我們救贖的全部歷史——祂藉著出生顯明自己為人成了人,替人成就此事,並從創造者造出了祂自己的受造物。祂取了奴僕的形像,卻是憑其大能的意願倒空了自己,並非憑其神性的本性——因祂的神性本不能不是祂素來所是的。祂為那些帶來救恩的神蹟,反倒換得了咒罵。
Him, I say — that Founder, as we have often said — now that the world grows old, He has bestowed what He had promised in the first age of the world. Whence the prophet says: 'Thy rod and thy staff, they have comforted me' (Ps. 22). The rod is the mother of the Lord, from which came forth that staff which should sustain the world now wearied with age. Him, therefore, having glided down into the virgin's womb — that we may weave anew the whole history of our redemption — He showed Himself made man by birth on behalf of man, and made His own creature out of the Creator. He took the form of a servant, but emptied Himself by the will of His power, not by the nature of His deity, whereby He could not but be what He had been. He earned curses in place of saving miracles.
284:54
Illum sputa, illum volmas, illum cotonum spineam, illum postremo crucem fuisse perpessum; illam inferna penetrasse, illum tertia die resurrexisse in id corpus quod cruci fuerat affixum, illum hominem post mortem Deum vivum cœlum petiisse victorem, sedere ad dexteram Dei. venturum suo tempore ad judicium faciendum: illum Spiritu Dei per sanctorum suorum ora celebrari.' Haec cogitasse vixisse est, hæc cogitatio pastus animæ est, in haec relabi vel recurrere cum Domino jungi est, et cum ipso per hæc humiliari, est cum ipso pati, cum ipso mori, et cum ipso etiam suscitari. Quid dicam de ipsa resurrectione, in qua cum rideamur a gentibus, non separamur a Christo:
祂就是那忍受唾罵、忍受傷痕、忍受荊棘冠冕、最終忍受十字架的一位;那深入陰間的一位;那第三日復活進入那曾被釘在十字架上之身體的一位;那死後成為活神之人、作為得勝者尋求上天、要坐在神右邊、要在祂自己的時候前來施行審判的一位;那藉著祂眾聖徒的口、被神的靈所頌揚的一位。曾默想這些事就是曾活過;這默想乃是靈魂的糧食;退回或奔回這些事中,就是與主聯合;並藉這些與祂一同被降卑,就是與祂一同受苦、與祂一同死、也與祂一同復活。至於復活本身,我還能說甚麼呢?在其中,我們縱被外邦人譏笑,也不與基督分離。
Him it was who endured the spittle, the wounds, the crown of thorns, and at the last the cross; who penetrated the nether places, who on the third day rose again into that body which had been fixed to the cross; who, a man after death, God the living, sought heaven as victor, to sit at the right hand of God, to come in His own time to hold judgment; who is celebrated by the Spirit of God through the mouths of His saints. To have thought upon these things is to have lived; this thinking is the food of the soul; to slip back or run back into these things is to be joined with the Lord; and through these to be humbled with Him is to suffer with Him, to die with Him, and with Him also to be raised up. What shall I say of the resurrection itself, in which, though we be mocked by the heathen, we are not separated from Christ?
284:55
licet et multi qui se Christianos dicunt resurrectionem carnis excludant. Sed sic sint illi sine corpore, quibus forte conceditur, si fas est dici, aliter repræsentari Domino, quam Dominus remeavit ad Patrem nos ut credimus, et loquamur. 134 CAP. VU. — Quid, inquam, hac cogitatione laetius? Quid hac se esse poterit erectius ? fixumque magis in nostris animis inhaerere debet, nos aliquando, cum hinc exierimus, ad corpora nostra esse redituros, et animae interim et corporis divortium, non id agere, ut nihil simus omnino, sed ut meliores per Dei Spiritum reformemur, quoniam jam bic Dominum id pignus nobis promisisse accepimus.
雖然甚至有許多自稱為基督徒的人否認肉身的復活。但就讓那些人沒有身體吧——若容許這樣說——那些或許蒙准以不同於主自己返回父那裡的方式被呈於主前的人;至於我們,就讓我們照我們所行的去相信、去述說。第七章——我問,還有甚麼比這思念更喜樂的呢?還有甚麼比這更振奮人心、更當堅定地纏繞、固植於我們魂中的呢,就是:有一天,當我們從此離世,我們必要回到我們的身體;且魂與體暫時的分離,其作用並非叫我們全然歸於無有,乃是叫我們藉著神的靈被更新為更美好的,因為我們在此已然領受了主向我們所應許的這憑據。
although even many who call themselves Christians exclude the resurrection of the flesh. But let those be without a body to whom perchance it is granted — if it be lawful to say so — to be presented to the Lord otherwise than the Lord Himself returned to the Father; but let us believe, and speak, as we do. CHAP. VII. — What, I ask, is more joyful than this thought? What could be more uplifting than this, or ought more firmly to cling and be fixed in our souls, than that we, one day, when we depart from here, shall return to our bodies; and that the separation of soul and body meanwhile does not so work that we should be nothing at all, but that we may be reformed into something better through the Spirit of God, since we have already received here that the Lord has promised us this pledge?
284:56
Et hoc corpus, quod in sui natura caducum est, et merito pristinæ transgressionis gravatum, et maledictione divina fertur, ad terram ibit (Genes. III); id rursum post multa tempora, id est in fine sæculorum, cum minima pars favillæ sit, ut forte jam nulla, ab eadem terra, quae illud corrumpit in nihilum: quoniam ipsa liberanda est a servitute corruptionis, in integram membrorum suorum soliditatem, et in statum pulchritudinis decoremque renovandum. Quem talis cogitatio non cum admiratione delectet ?
而這身體,按其本性乃是必朽壞的,並因先前的過犯理當受重壓,又被神的咒詛所定「必歸於塵土」(創三);這同一個身體,在許多世代之後——就是在諸世代的末了,當它已成為最微小的一撮灰燼,或許甚至化為烏有之時——必從那將它朽壞為無有的同一塵土中被復起(因為那塵土自身也要脫離敗壞的轄制),進入其肢體全然完好的境地,並要被更新為美麗榮秀的狀態。這樣的思念,豈不叫人在驚奇中歡欣嗎?
And this body, which in its own nature is perishable, and deservedly weighed down by reason of the former transgression, and is borne by the divine curse 'shall go to the earth' (Gen. 3); this same body again, after long ages — that is, in the end of the ages, when it shall be the smallest particle of ash, or perhaps none at all — shall be raised from that same earth which corrupts it into nothing (since the earth itself is to be delivered from the bondage of corruption), into the whole soundness of its members, and shall be renewed into a state of beauty and comeliness. Whom would such a thought not delight, together with wonder?
284:57
Reliquias, inquam, corporum nostrorum aut nullas aut minimas certe, et quantulascunque, attamen sordidas, et animi nunquam sine horrore inspectas in suum iterum hominem, non ut Pythagoras mentiens et delirans a in Euphorbo esse credatur, sed in proprium suum corpus, et nomen, per ossa et nervos, per venas, per cuncta vitalia, b verum etiam articulatim recompaginandum. Hoc autem non est angustum, cum omnium vel frugum vel stirpium semina, majora, et pulchriora in graminibus redeant, quam in terra vel ab hominibus sata sunt, vel sua sponte ceciderunt. c Quis non seminari se in terra, ut ita dixerim, lxtetur, quæ nos meliores quam acceperat reddat, dicente Apostolo:
我說,我們身體的殘餘——無論是全然無有,或至多是最微小、最細少的,且是污穢的,是心思一望便驚駭的——必要重新結合成各人自己的人:並非如那說謊而癲狂的畢達哥拉斯所要人相信的,說一個人可存在於某個歐福耳玻斯裡,乃是進入各人自己本有的身體與名分,藉著骨頭、筋、血脈,藉著一切維生的部分,是的,甚至逐節逐節地重新接合。這並非狹隘難成之事,因為一切五穀或植物的種子,在青草中返回時,都比人撒在地裡、或自行落下時更大更美。誰不歡喜——可以這樣說——被撒在地裡呢?這地把我們歸還時,勝過它所領受我們的,正如使徒所說:(下段續)
The remains, I say, of our bodies — whether none at all, or at most the smallest and least, yet foul, and never beheld by the mind without horror — shall be recompacted again into their own man: not that, as the lying and raving Pythagoras would have it believed, one should exist in a Euphorbus, but into one's own proper body and name, through bones and sinews, through veins, through all the vital parts, yea even joint by joint. And this is no narrow thing, since the seeds of all crops or plants return in the grass greater and fairer than they were sown in the earth by men, or fell of their own accord. Who would not rejoice, so to speak, to be sown in the earth, which gives us back better than it had received us, as the Apostle says:
284:58
Reaurrectio mortuorum seminatur in corruptione; d surget autem in incorruptione (I Cor. xv). Quæ possessio præsentium huic spei poterit comparari ? Aut quid erit aliud, quod ad contemptum mortis attollat, quam haec meditatio divinis promissionibus et prophelarum vocibus explicata ? Quid tale Cleombrotus Ambraciota in Platonis libro disputante didicerat, qui homicida sui esse non timuit, ac se altissimo praecipitavit e muro, dum et nullum post mortem autumaret esse judicium; et sine discrimine meritorum aliquo, omnes animas post corpora aequaliter ferri arbitraretur ad coelum ?
「死人復活也是這樣:所種的是必朽壞的,復活的是不朽壞的。」(林前十五)現今之物的任何產業,怎能與這盼望相比呢?還有甚麼別的能把人提升到藐視死亡的地步,勝過這藉著神聖應許與眾先知之聲所展開的默想呢?安布拉基亞的克萊翁布羅托斯在柏拉圖辯論的書中,學到過甚麼這樣的事呢?他不怕作自己的兇手,從一堵極高的牆上把自己拋下,既以為死後並無審判,又臆想眾魂在離開身體之後,都不分功過地一同被帶往天上?
'The resurrection of the dead: it is sown in corruption, but it shall rise in incorruption' (1 Cor. 15). What possession of present things could be compared to this hope? Or what else could there be that would lift a man to a contempt of death, than this meditation, unfolded by divine promises and by the voices of the prophets? What such thing had Cleombrotus of Ambracia learned in the book of Plato's disputing — he who did not fear to be his own murderer, and hurled himself from a very high wall, supposing both that there was no judgment after death, and that all souls, without any distinction of merits, were borne equally to heaven after they left the body?
284:59
Quod adeo omnes pro vero tenuerunt,et sic omnes illos saeculi sapientes una nebula hujus erroris involvit, ut et ipse tam laudabilis, ut putant, doctor Socrates, homicidam ipsum se privatim, ne publice occideretur, occiderit. Aliud longe beatus Apostolus præmeditatum habebat et cogitatum: Qui non ab hominibus, sed per revelationem Domini nostri Jesu Christi (Galat. i), quod docebat acceperat, nec Academiae nemorosae obscuris tectus umbraculis, sed coelesti illustratus lumine; nec in ludo aliquo litteratorio inter puerulos oscitantes, sed in tertio coelo inter angelos coruscantes imbutus, in contemptum vitae praesentis exclamat: Mihi vivere Christus est, et mori lucrum (Philip. 1).
這謬誤竟有這麼多人奉為真理,這迷惑的一團雲霧竟籠罩了那世代所有的智者,甚至那位(照他們所想)極其可讚的教師蘇格拉底,也私下作自己的兇手,自殺以免被公開處死。那有福的使徒所預先默想、所思念的,卻與此大相逕庭——他所教導的,是「不是從人,乃是從我們主耶穌基督的啟示」領受的(加一),他所蒙蔽的不是枝葉繁茂之學園的幽暗蔭影,而是被屬天的光照亮;他所受的薰陶,不是在某個文法學校裡、在打呵欠的小童之間,乃是在第三層天上、在閃耀的眾天使之間;他在藐視現今生命之際呼喊說:「因我活著就是基督,我死了就有益處。」(腓一)
This error so many held for truth, and one such cloud of this delusion enveloped all those wise men of the age, that even that so praiseworthy teacher (as they think), Socrates, killed himself privately as his own murderer, that he might not be publicly put to death. Far otherwise had the blessed Apostle premeditated and thought — he who had received what he taught 'not from men, but through the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ' (Gal. 1), being covered not by the dark shades of a leafy Academy, but illumined by heavenly light; nor imbued in some grammarian's school among gaping little boys, but in the third heaven among the flashing angels; and in contempt of the present life he cries out: 'For me to live is Christ, and to die is gain' (Phil. 1).
284:60
Non certe murum de quo se præcipitet ad mortem, sed Christum Dominum, per quem hoc mortale ab immortalitate absorbeatur, inquirit. tlenim intelligit ei lucrum esse mori, cui sit vita futura cum Christo. Sine Domino autem nihil prodest, etiamsi totum mundum lucretur, animæ autem suæ delrimentum esse passurum. Credebat igitur virilie, vas electionis, se per Christum Dominum nostrum de hac terra, quæ nunquam sine usura reddit quod accipit, sed alia minore, 135 alia plerumque majore cum fenore ut tricesimum et sexagesimum, et centesimum, Domino ipso in Evangelio germina quae plantaverat sic legente; de qua terraetiam veritas, quam Pilatus ignorabat; quam nemo principum hujus sæculi vidit:
他所尋求的,斷然不是一堵可供他拋身赴死的牆,乃是主基督,藉著祂這必死的可被不死所吞滅。因為他明白,死於他有益——他將來的生命是與基督同在。然而沒有主,就一無益處,縱使人賺得全世界,卻要賠上自己的靈魂。所以他,那揀選的器皿,剛強地相信,藉著我們的主基督,他必從這地被帶走——這地把它所領受的歸還時,從不無利息,有時以較少、往往以較大的增添歸還,如三十倍、六十倍、一百倍,主自己在福音書中如此宣讀祂所栽種的種子——這地也生出那彼拉多所不認識的真理,就是這世代掌權者無一人看見的:(下段續)
Assuredly he seeks not a wall from which to hurl himself to death, but Christ the Lord, through whom this mortal may be swallowed up by immortality. For he understands that it is gain for him to die, whose life to come is with Christ. But without the Lord nothing profits, even if a man should gain the whole world, but would suffer the loss of his own soul. He believed, therefore, manfully, that vessel of election, that through Christ our Lord he would be borne from this earth — which never returns what it receives without interest, but sometimes with a smaller, most often with a greater increase, as thirtyfold and sixtyfold and a hundredfold, the Lord Himself in the Gospel so reading the seeds He had planted — from which earth also comes the truth which Pilate knew not, which none of the princes of this age saw:
284:61
Si enim cognovissent, nunquam Dominum gloriæ crucifixissent (7 Cor. XXVIII); de ipsa, inquam, se Apostolus transformatum corpori claritatis Domini in lucentia membra rediturum ait: per Salomonem quoque islud Sapientia promittente, cum dicit: Fulgebunt,usa, et tanquam scintillæ in arundineto discurrent (Sap. III). Et ideo in hanc vocem: mihi vivere Christus est (Philip. I), securus erupit, in qua utique, quae fuerunt merita victura sunt; qui autem longe ut ignoraverunt, ita et ignorabuntur. Nunc, si videtur, quid seDtentia illa Salomonica promiserit inquiramus: Fulgebunt justi, et tanquam scintillæ in arundineto discurrent.
「他們若知道,就不把榮耀的主釘在十字架上了。」(林前二)我說,使徒宣告他必從這地被改變,回到那與主榮光之身體相符的、發光的肢體裡;智慧藉所羅門也應許此事,說:「他們必發光,如同蘆葦叢中往來奔馳的火花。」(智三)因此他坦然爆發出這話——「因我活著就是基督」(腓一)——在其中,凡曾是功勞的,必定得勝;至於那些遠離的,正如他們不認識祂,照樣他們也必不被認識。如今,若合宜,讓我們探究所羅門那句話所應許的:「義人必發光,如同蘆葦叢中往來奔馳的火花。」
'For had they known it, they would never have crucified the Lord of glory' (1 Cor. 2). From this earth, I say, the Apostle declares that he, transformed, would return into shining members conformed to the body of the Lord's brightness; and Wisdom too promises this through Solomon, when it says: 'They shall shine forth, and shall run to and fro like sparks among the reeds' (Wisd. 3). And therefore into this word — 'For me to live is Christ' (Phil. 1) — he securely burst out, in which assuredly what things had been merits shall be victors; but those who were far off, as they knew Him not, so also shall they not be known. Now, if it seem good, let us inquire what that Solomonic sentence promised: 'The just shall shine forth, and shall run to and fro like sparks among the reeds.'
284:62
Quid est, ut quibus flammarum claritas condonatur, his tam humilis locus ubi discurrant etabjectus offertur; ut loci despectu decrescere videantur, qui corporuni luce creverunt? Quid est, inquam, quod astris per arundineta comparati volitabunt, et in sidcrei forma fulgoris stirpes terrarum miserrimas permeabunt: cum longe incongrue misceantur, vel fulgores arundinetis, vel arundineta fulgoribus? AniMadverte, oro te, divini verba mysterii: cui ut non de bobus, ita nec de arundineto cura est: aut in resurrectione arundineta quid faciunt, nisi quod nos per omnium formas, vel pecudum, vel stirpium laborat ostendere; ac per hoc, ut Apostolus ait, pro nobis cuncta scripta sunt (Rom. iv.
這是甚麼意思呢?那些蒙賜火焰之光輝的,竟得一個如此卑微低賤之處在其中往來奔馳;以致那些因身體之光而增高的,似乎因處所之卑而顯得縮減?我說,這是甚麼意思呢?他們被比作星宿卻要飛掠蘆葦叢,並以星辰般的光輝形態穿越地上最卑賤的莖稈:光輝與蘆葦叢彼此相配何其不倫——無論是光輝配蘆葦叢,或蘆葦叢配光輝?我求你,留意這神聖奧祕的話語:正如祂不掛念牛,照樣祂也不掛念蘆葦叢。不然,蘆葦叢在復活時作甚麼呢?豈非祂藉一切事物的形態、無論牲畜或植物,竭力向我們指明;並藉此,如使徒所說,凡經上所寫的,都是為我們寫的(羅四)?
What means it, that to those to whom the brightness of flames is granted, so lowly and abject a place is offered wherein to run to and fro; so that they should seem to shrink by the meanness of the place, who had grown by the light of their bodies? What means it, I say, that likened to the stars they shall flit through the reeds, and in the form of a starry splendor shall pass through the most wretched stalks of the earth: when splendors and reed-beds are joined together far incongruously — either splendors to reed-beds, or reed-beds to splendors? Mark, I pray thee, the words of the divine mystery: for which, as He has no care for oxen, so neither has He care for a reed-bed. Or what do reed-beds do at the resurrection, save that He labors to show us through the forms of all things, whether of cattle or of plants; and through this, as the Apostle says, all things were written for our sakes (Rom. 4)?
284:63
Intellige per arundineti imagines, infideles homines et incredulos demonstrari: eorumque corpora superficie grata, et interius cassa virtutibus, quae ubi primum spiritus vanitatis inflarit, sibila serpentis imitentur, c et sanos partus, viperarum progenies obsequantur. Scintillæ. Inquit, in arundineto. Sancti ergo inter peccatores, quoniam non omnis caro eadem caro. In arundineto, ait, id est, vacua luce corpora, et alienis arsura fulgoribus, quibus sanctorum claritas futura pro poena est: quoniam Deus ignis consumens est, et justi in imaginem Deitatis advenient. Fecit enim Deus hominem, ad imaginem suam fecit illum (Genes. I); et Apostolus testatur credere se;
要明白,藉蘆葦叢的形象所顯明的,乃是不忠不信之人,以及他們表面悅人、內裡卻空無德行的身體;這些身體一旦被虛妄的靈所吹脹,便效法蛇的嘶聲,且不生出健全的後裔,反倒生出毒蛇的種類。它說:「火花在蘆葦叢中。」所以聖徒是在罪人之中,因為並非凡肉體都是一樣的肉體。它說「在蘆葦叢中」——就是那些空無光亮的身體,將被別人的光輝焚燒,聖徒那將來的光輝於他們乃是刑罰:因為神是烈火,義人必要進入神性的形像裡。「神造人,是照著自己的形像造的」(創一);使徒也作見證說他相信:(下段續)
Understand that through the images of the reed-bed are shown unfaithful and unbelieving men, and their bodies pleasing on the surface but inwardly empty of virtues; which, as soon as the spirit of vanity has inflated them, imitate the hissings of the serpent, and, instead of sound offspring, yield the brood of vipers. 'Sparks,' it says, 'among the reeds.' The saints, therefore, are among sinners, since not all flesh is the same flesh. 'Among the reeds,' it says — that is, bodies empty of light, and to be burned by another's brightness, for whom the coming brightness of the saints is as a punishment: for God is a consuming fire, and the just shall come into the image of the Deity. 'For God made man; He made him after His own image' (Gen. 1); and the Apostle testifies that he believes
284:64
quod illi similis sit futurus necessarie. Si enim similis Deo fuit cum factus est, et similis futurus est cum resurget: quoniam quidquid nunc in nobis dissimile videtur auctori, id omne vitio transgressionis impressum est; et vivam veritatis fornam, artifex mendaciorum strumosis acus deformavit, suamque pravitatem nostris etiam membris, dum mentes corrupit, inscripsit; quae per resurrectionis gloriam male adjecta aut imminuta diluentur, et id solum quod auctorem rerum tanquam in speculo reddat, emicabit: ut interpolator opus suum se doleat perdidisse, et, homp tandem se integrum esse glorietur. Non tamen boc omnes, ut jam diximus, sed justi tantum in luce erimus.
人必然要與祂相似。因為人受造時若與神相似,復活時也必與祂相似:因為如今在我們裡面凡顯得與我們的創造者不相似的,全是被過犯之罪印上去的;那說謊的匠人用他潰爛的針把真理活的形像弄得殘缺,並在敗壞我們心思之際,把他自己的邪僻甚至刻在我們的肢體上;這些惡意添加或削減的,必藉復活的榮耀被洗去,唯獨那如在鏡中映出萬物創造者的,必要發光煥發:以致那篡改者要為喪失了他的作品而悲傷,而人終要因自己得以完全而歡耀。然而,如我們已說過的,並非人人,唯獨義人,才要在光中。
that man shall of necessity be like unto Him. For if he was like unto God when he was made, he shall also be like unto Him when he rises again: since whatever now appears in us unlike our Author is all stamped by the fault of transgression; and the craftsman of lies, with his scrofulous needle, has deformed the living form of the truth, and has inscribed his own depravity even upon our members, while he has corrupted our minds; which things, ill added or diminished, shall through the glory of the resurrection be washed away, and that alone shall shine forth which renders back the Author of things as in a mirror: so that the falsifier may grieve that he has lost his work, and man may at last glory that he is made whole. Yet not all, as we have already said, but only the just, shall be in the light.
284:65
Quoniam omnes quidem resurgemus, sed non omnes immutabimur (1 Thess. IV), discretionem enim faciet personarum diversitas meritorum. Nam et si inter ipsos sanctos erit aliqua de operatione distantia, dicente Apostolo: Stella a stella differet in claritate (I Cor. xv): quam diversitatem vel de impiis, vel de peccaloribus sentiemus, quorum alii in judicio, alii in sanctorum consilio resurgunt. Qui etsi resurrectionis ipsius tempore segregantur, quid de habitu,. formaque dicemus? Quæ, ut mihi videtur, non veste aliqua textili, neque mulierum elaborata pensis, sed suis meritis 136 et orationibus erit inventa: bcato Joanne hoc in revelatione monstrante, qui sanctos ait indutos byssinum (Apoc.
因為「我們眾人固然都要復活,卻不都要改變」(林前十五);功勞的差異必造成位分的分別。因為即使在聖徒自己中間,就其工作也必有某種差異,正如使徒所說:「這星和那星的榮光也有分別」(林前十五)——那麼論到不敬虔的或論到罪人,我們必覺察何等的差異呢?他們中有的在審判中復活,有的在聖徒的議會中復活。且若在復活的那時他們就被分別,我們論到他們的衣著與形態又當如何說呢?依我看來,那必不是甚麼織成的衣裳,也不是婦女紡線所作的,乃是各人自己的功勞與禱告所尋見的:那有福的約翰在啟示錄中顯明此事,他說他看見眾聖徒身穿細麻衣(啟)
For 'we shall all indeed rise again, but we shall not all be changed' (1 Cor. 15); for the diversity of merits shall make a distinction of persons. For even if among the saints themselves there shall be some difference as to their working, the Apostle saying, 'star differeth from star in glory' (1 Cor. 15) — what diversity shall we feel concerning the impious or concerning sinners, of whom some rise in the judgment, others in the council of the saints? And if at the very time of the resurrection they are separated, what shall we say concerning their raiment and form? Which, as it seems to me, shall be found not in any woven garment, nor wrought by the spinning of women, but in their own merits and prayers: the blessed John showing this in the Revelation, who says he saw the saints clothed in fine linen (Rev.
284:66
xix) se vidisse. Et ne forte sub tegmina byssini, aut stamina quaereremus et materiale, vel corruptibile ac fluxum aliquid exerceri in coelestibus opinaremur, subdidit: byssinum autem justificationes sanctorum sunt. Tunc ergo, ut intelligo, in superticic corporis nostri venient, quæ nunc sunt tecta sub corpore. Tunc unicuique, miserum me ! conscientia sua vestis fiet. Tunc ea quæ de lundamento illo, quale aliud non potest poni Cor. III) ab unoquoque superædificata sunt, præeminebunt, ut aut mercedem accipiat qui mausura constituit, aut detrimentum patiatur qui arsura construxit. Jam quid illa commemorem quæ sequuntur, quæ tota sanctorum sunt?
(啟十九)免得我們或許在「細麻衣」之下尋求經緯與材料,或臆想在諸天之處成就了甚麼可朽壞、消逝之物,他便補充說:「這細麻衣就是聖徒的義行。」所以,照我所領會的,那時我們身體的表面必顯出如今隱藏在身體之下的事物。那時各人——可憐的我啊!——他自己的良心必成為衣裳。那時各人在那別無他物可立的根基上所建造的(林前三),必要顯得卓越突出,以致或是那立起必存之物的得賞賜,或是那建造必焚之物的受虧損。如今我又何必追述那接續而來、全然屬乎聖徒的事呢?
(Rev. 19). And lest perchance under 'fine linen' we should seek warps and woofs and material, or should suppose that something corruptible and fleeting is wrought in the heavenly places, he added: 'the fine linen is the justifications of the saints.' Then, therefore, as I understand it, there shall come upon the surface of our body those things which now are covered beneath the body. Then to each one — wretched me! — his own conscience shall become a garment. Then those things which have been built up by each upon that foundation, than which no other can be laid (1 Cor. 3), shall stand forth pre-eminent, so that either he who has set up things that shall abide may receive a reward, or he who has built things that shall burn may suffer loss. Now why should I call to mind those things which follow, which wholly belong to the saints?
284:67
Carnem sine terra, corpus sine doloris sensu, animam sine metu, vitam sine fine, ætatem sine tempore, lucem sine nocte, beatitudinem sine fine? Video hominem, et in homine Deum: Quoniam Deus omnia in omnibus eat (1 Cor. xv). Totum quidquid nunc impossibile homini cernitur, id tum neri per munificentiam perpetui regis, velare, et revelare, liquescere, ac resolidare, eumque fieri, quem et intrare ad discipulos concreta et corporea parietum valvarumque non senserunt, et dii tamen stare omnes ante se intus conspexerunt. Et omnia quæ sine hoc corpore Dei spiritus fovebat, corpus cum Dei spiritu a esse facturum. Satiari delectatione harum cognitionum Christianitas non potest.
肉體卻無塵土,身體卻無痛苦之感,靈魂卻無懼怕,生命卻無窮盡,年歲卻無時序,光明卻無黑夜,福樂卻無終止?我看見一個人,在這人裡面看見神:「因為神要在萬人之中作萬有。」(林前十五)如今凡被視為人所不能的,那時都必藉那永世君王的厚賜而成就:遮蔽與顯露,消融與再度堅固,且祂自己要成為這樣的:門徒既未察覺祂——那有形有體的——穿門越壁而入,卻又都看見祂站在他們面前的室內。凡神的靈在無此身體時所眷養的,身體連同神的靈都必要成就。基督信仰對這些知識的喜樂,永不能饜足。
Flesh without earth, body without the sense of pain, soul without fear, life without end, an age without time, light without night, blessedness without end? I behold a man, and in the man God: 'For God shall be all in all' (1 Cor. 15). All that now is discerned as impossible to man, shall then be done through the bounty of the eternal King: to veil and to reveal, to melt away and to make solid again, and Himself to become such that both the disciples did not perceive Him, being solid and corporeal, entering through walls and doors, and yet they all beheld Him standing within before them. And all that the Spirit of God cherished without this body, the body together with the Spirit of God shall bring to pass. Christianity cannot be sated with the delight of these knowings.
284:68
Hæc illi requies, hoc oblectamentum est, hæc voluptas, hæc delicix ire mente in sedem Dei, ibique sibi locum et partem sedis non sua præsumptione, sed Divinitatis pollicitatione usurpare. Nec hoc illi arduum videtur, postquam jam ibi in Christo Domnino b suum esse hominem cognoscit. Vindicat sibi æquum jus de cognatione per Deum carnis assumptæ: quoniam de carne ejus sumus et de ossibus ejus. Ipse enim est caput corporis Ecclesiæ; ipse principium omnis principatus et potestatum, evangelizante sic Apostolo: Ex quo totum corpus sic compactum, et productum per conjunctionem, et copulatum crescit in augmentum Dei (Coloss. II). Quid ergo venturum judicium;
這就是他們那安息,這是他們的歡愉,這是他們的喜樂,這是他們的甘美:以心思進入神的寶座之處,並在那裡為自己認取一個座位與一份基業,不是憑自己的擅取,乃是憑神性的應許。這在他們看來也不算為難,因為在那裡、在主基督裡,人已認出自己的人性。他為自己認取一種同等的親屬之權,藉著神,關乎那被取的肉體:因為我們是祂肉中的肉、骨中的骨。祂是身體教會的頭;祂是一切執政掌權的元始,正如使徒所傳講的:「本於祂,全身既緊密相連、藉著聯絡而生長、又彼此結合,就在神裡面漸漸增長。」(西二)那麼,論到那將要來的審判,我還能說甚麼呢?
This is that rest of theirs, this their delight, this their pleasure, these their delicacies: to go in mind into the seat of God, and there to claim for themselves a place and a portion of the seat, not by their own presumption, but by the promise of the Divinity. Nor does this seem hard to them, since already there, in Christ the Lord, one recognizes his own manhood. He claims for himself an equal right of kinship, through God, to the flesh that was assumed: since we are of His flesh and of His bones. For He is the head of the body, the Church; He is the beginning of all rule and of powers, as the Apostle preaches: 'from whom the whole body, thus compacted and produced through its connection, and knit together, groweth unto the increase of God' (Col. 2). What then shall I say of the judgment to come;
284:69
ct diem Domini piis optabilem, ct impiis fugiendum; quid illud igneum diluvium, non aquarum, fumante terra, fugiente mari, coelo in libri speciem complicato, loquar? c Tristia sunt hæc divitibus sæculi, sed exspectanda pauperibus Christi, pro quibus in psalmo Dominus suspirat, dicens: Propter miseriam inopum, et gemitum pauperum nunc exsurgam (Psal. XII). Quid tribunal illud ex majestate judicantis immensum, et duodecim sedibus adorandum, tantamque datam a Filio potestatem, ut in judicando habeant etiam angelorum substantias, quasi eorum creator addictas, dicente Apostolo: nescitis quoniam et angelos judicabimus (I Cor. VI)?
又論到主的日子,那日對敬虔人是可羨慕的,對不敬虔人卻是當逃避的;我又當論到那火的洪流——不是水的——地冒煙、海奔逃、天像書卷般捲起,說些甚麼呢?這些事對這世上的富人是可悲的,對基督的貧窮人卻是當等候的,主在詩篇中為他們歎息說:「因為困苦人的冤屈,和窮乏人的歎息,我現在要起來。」(詩十二)我又當論到那審判之座說甚麼呢?它因審判者的威嚴而浩大無量,當在十二個寶座上受敬拜,且子所賜的權柄何其大,以致他們在審判時,連天使的本質都在其判斷之下,彷彿這些天使被交付給他們的創造者,正如使徒所說:「豈不知我們要審判天使嗎?」(林前六)
and of the day of the Lord, desirable to the godly, and to be fled by the impious; what shall I say of that fiery deluge — not of waters — the earth smoking, the sea fleeing, the heaven folded together into the likeness of a book? These things are grievous to the rich of this world, but to be awaited by the poor of Christ, on whose behalf the Lord sighs in the Psalm, saying: 'Because of the misery of the needy, and the groaning of the poor, now will I arise' (Ps. 11). What shall I say of that tribunal, immeasurable through the majesty of the Judge, and to be adored upon twelve thrones, and of so great a power given by the Son, that in judging they should have even the substances of angels, as though addicted to their creator, the Apostle saying: 'Know ye not that we shall judge even angels?' (1 Cor. 6)
284:70
Et quid erit quod non mancipandum illis esse credatur, quibus et spiritualis illa nequitiarum natura subjicienda est? Quid ergo tunc facient, qui nunc in honoribus gloriantur, qui per terribiles præfecturas, et fasces, et æternos (ut existimant) consulatus, Deo se comparare nituntur rapina, non natura? Quid faciet qui conjungit domuum ad domum ?
還有甚麼不會被信是要交付給這些人的呢?既然連那些邪惡之屬靈本質都要被服在他們之下。那麼那些如今以尊榮自誇的人,要怎麼辦呢?他們藉著可畏的官職、束棒儀仗、以及(照他們所想)永久的執政官職位,力圖以搶奪、而非以本性,把自己與神相比?那以房接房的人又要怎麼辦呢?
And what shall there be that would not be believed to be delivered up to those to whom even that spiritual nature of wickednesses is to be made subject? What then shall they do, who now glory in honors, who through terrible prefectures and fasces and everlasting (as they think) consulships, strive to compare themselves to God by robbery, not by nature? What shall he do who joins house to house?
284:71
qui perturbata civitate, et cunctis quibus stringebatur hinc inde limitibus fractis, montes, flumina, mariaque transiliens, quantum ad ipsum pertinet, unam vult possessionem esse, quæ communis omnium terra est, et insatiabili cupidi tale latitudinem immensi orbis excedens, in Alexandri Macedonis anxietatem et innumerabiles Epicureorum mundos diffunditur, acquisitisque per aviditatem 137 mundi hujus angustiis, in alium creduIus, non æstimata proprii corporis possibilitate accenditur, autumans passurum se damnum esse de jure, si fidem non adhibuerit de furore ?
他把一座城攪亂,衝破了四面環繞它的一切界限,越過山嶺、江河與海洋,就他所能而論,巴望天下歸為一個產業,就是那本屬眾人共有的地;他以永不知足的貪婪超越那浩瀚世界的廣袤,散溢入馬其頓亞歷山大的憂慮、以及伊壁鳩魯派無數世界的妄想之中;及至憑貪慾取盡了這世界的疆域,又輕信另有一個世界,便燃起熱望——全然不計自己身體的能耐——以為若不對自己的狂亂加以信任,他便要蒙受權利的損失?
who, having thrown a city into confusion, and broken through all the boundaries by which it was hemmed in on every side, leaping over mountains, rivers, and seas, wishes — so far as in him lies — that there be one possession, which is the common earth of all; and, exceeding by insatiable greed the breadth of the immense world, is diffused into the anxiety of Alexander of Macedon and into the innumerable worlds of the Epicureans; and, the confines of this world having been acquired through avidity, believing there is another, is inflamed — the possibility of his own body not being reckoned — supposing that he shall suffer a loss of right if he lend no credence to his own frenzy?
284:72
Quid hi facient, qui tanquam correptores morum, Domini familiam attentius castigatiusque viventem, d aut in vestibus humili colore, aut in cibi arida parcitate, aut in vigiliarum non otiosa sobrietate, velut aut indumentis mollioribus dclicatam,autepulis copiosioribus saginatam, aut thoris calidioribus oscitantem divellunt ac vexant, nescientes quod in sanctis Dei martyribus confessoribusque oculi ejus pupilla feriatur? Peribunl sine dubio, peribunt in illa die omnes cogitationes eorum: nec eos apud tribunal illud aut Lu. cius Crassus defendet, aut M. Antonius, aut istis eloquentior Tullius:
那些人又要怎麼辦呢?他們儼然作道德的糾正者,撕扯攪擾主的家眷——這家眷更用心、更嚴格地生活,或穿著顏色卑素的衣服,或在食物枯燥的節儉中,或在守夜那並非閒懶的清醒中——彷彿這家眷是被較柔軟的衣裳弄得嬌貴,或被較豐盛的筵席養肥,或在較溫暖的臥榻上打盹——他們不曉得,在神那些聖潔的殉道者與認信者身上,被擊打的乃是祂眼中的瞳人。他們必定滅亡;在那日,他們一切的意念都必消滅;在那審判之座前,路奇烏斯·克拉蘇斯不能為他們辯護,馬克·安東尼也不能,比這些人更雄辯的圖利烏斯也不能:(下段續)
What shall these do, who — as though correctors of morals — tear at and harass the Lord's household, which lives more attentively and more strictly, whether in garments of humble color, or in the dry frugality of its food, or in the not idle sobriety of its vigils, as though it were made delicate by softer clothing, or fattened by more abundant feastings, or drowsing upon warmer couches — not knowing that in the holy martyrs and confessors of God the very apple of His eye is struck? They shall perish without doubt; in that day all their thoughts shall perish; nor at that tribunal shall either Lucius Crassus defend them, or Mark Antony, or Tullius more eloquent than these:
284:73
quoniam omnis tunc sæculi lingua obmutescet, et sola erit in rusticulis suis facunda iustitia, quæ infantium fecit ora diserta, et mutorum linguas novum solvit in canticum, coelestemque sibi harmoniam per sui misericordiam de suis oviculis acquisivit. Ad cujus gloriam celebrandam etiam si hominum studia cessaverint, in confusionem generis humani lapides damnati monstrantur. e Sed ego a matcria proposita velut mortalium improbitatem increpaturus excessi. Et uniformis mali tanquam publicus accusator mundanis vitiis, dum me aliquorum miseret, non peperci. Cum etsi judicandi tempus esset, lapidem tamen mittere super adulterum non auderem;
因為那時這世代的舌頭都必啞口無言,唯有公義在祂自己那些鄉野之人裡雄辯滔滔——這公義使嬰孩的口能言,使啞巴的舌放聲唱出新歌,並藉自己的憐憫,從自己那小小的羊群中,為自己贏得了屬天的和諧。為要頌揚這公義的榮耀,縱使人的熱心止息,那些石頭也顯出被定罪,令人類蒙羞。不過,我離了所提出的題目,儼然要責備必死之人的邪惡。作為一個對一致之惡的公開控訴者,我針對世俗的惡行,雖然憐憫某些人,卻未曾放過他們。然而,即便到了審判的時候,我也不敢向那行姦淫的人扔石頭;
since then every tongue of this age shall be struck dumb, and eloquent alone shall be justice in its own rustics — that justice which made the mouths of infants fluent, and loosed the tongues of the dumb into a new song, and acquired for itself, through its own mercy, a heavenly harmony from its own little sheep. To celebrate whose glory, even if the zeal of men should cease, the stones stand condemned to the confusion of the human race. But I have digressed from the matter proposed, as one about to rebuke the wickedness of mortals. And, as a public accuser of a uniform evil, against worldly vices, while I pity some, I have not spared them. And yet, even were it the time for judging, I would not dare to cast a stone upon the adulterer;
284:74
etsi ad innocentis judicium purioris conscientiæ me armaret auctoritas, tempus tamen exspectare debebam, docente Apostolo, qui sanctis non judicium sustulit, sed distulit. Ait enim: Nolite judicare ante tempus (I Cor. IV). Illud resurrectionis tempus innuens exspectandum, quo per incorruptionis gloriam rediviva caro miranda assistet judicii, de æternitate jam manente constantia, cum assistet formido de lapsu: non trepidabit tunc. in alium ferre sententiam, cum de se meruerit esse securus. Caeterum nunc cuncta sunt dubia, cuncta nutabunda, dicente Apostolo: Considerans teipsum, ne et tu tenteris (Galat. vi), qui alium utique status tui nescius facile judices de ruina.
縱使較純潔良心的權柄使我武裝起來去審判無辜的人,我也當等候那時候,正如使徒所教導的,他並未從聖徒手中取去審判之權,只是延緩了它。因為他說:「時候未到,甚麼都不要論斷。」(林前四)他暗示那復活的時候是當等候的,那時藉著不朽之榮耀,復活的肉體要站立,配得審判,其堅定已從永恆而來長存,而墮落的懼怕仍在旁:那時它向別人下判斷必不戰兢,因它已配得為自己安然無懼。但如今凡事都不確定,凡事都搖搖欲墜,正如使徒所說:「你要謹慎自己,恐怕也被引誘。」(加六)你這對自己景況一無所知的人,卻要輕易論斷別人的敗落。
even if the authority of a purer conscience should arm me for the judgment of the innocent, yet I ought to await the time, the Apostle teaching, who did not take away judgment from the saints, but deferred it. For he says: 'Judge nothing before the time' (1 Cor. 4). He intimates that time of the resurrection is to be awaited, when through the glory of incorruption the revived flesh shall stand, worthy of judgment, its constancy already abiding from eternity, while the terror of the fall stands by: it shall not then tremble to bear sentence upon another, when it has deserved to be secure concerning itself. But now all things are doubtful, all things tottering, the Apostle saying: 'Considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted' (Gal. 6) — thou who, ignorant of thine own state, wouldest easily judge another concerning his ruin.
284:75
Quid et si miseris fiduciam, ut beatis Deus det? Præmia potius sanctorum, id est vera laudemus, quam improvidi aut intempestivi, vel de conscientia vel de tempore denotemur. CAP. VIII. -L Redeamus ergo. ad illas sanctorum nobilissimas et lætissimas cogitatienes: nam nihil laetius est quam mortalem de promissa sibi hæreditate meditari. Illum quidem quem diximus ante oculos collocemus, quandoquidem securius est vera celebrare quam miseranda culpare: licet vere felicia sine peccatorum non possint infelicitate narrari. Cernamus itaque, ut constituimus, Dei sanclos cum facibus per omnia volitare, et coruscantibus ad vindictam dexteris, ancipites gladios stringere.
倘若你把把握給了那可憐的人,如同神賜給那有福的人呢?我們寧可讚美聖徒的賞賜——就是那真實的賞賜——也不願因我們的良心或我們的時機不當,被烙上冒失或不合時宜的印記。第八章——那麼,讓我們回到聖徒那些最尊貴、最喜樂的思念;因為對必死之人而言,沒有甚麼比默想那應許給他的產業更喜樂的了。讓我們把我們所說過的那人置於眼前,因為頌揚真實之事比責備可悲之事更為穩妥——雖然真正有福之事,離了罪人的不幸便無從述說。那麼,讓我們如所定意的,觀看神的眾聖徒手持火炬四處飛掠,右手為施報而閃耀,抽出兩刃的刀劍。
What if thou shouldest give confidence to the wretched, as God gives to the blessed? Let us rather praise the rewards of the saints — that is, the true rewards — than be branded, whether for our conscience or for our timing, as improvident or unseasonable. CHAP. VIII. — Let us return, then, to those most noble and most joyful thoughts of the saints; for nothing is more joyful than for a mortal to meditate upon the inheritance promised to him. Let us set before our eyes that man of whom we have spoken, since it is safer to celebrate true things than to blame things pitiable — although things truly happy cannot be told without the unhappiness of sinners. Let us behold, then, as we have determined, the saints of God flitting everywhere with their torches, and with right hands flashing for vengeance, drawing their two-edged swords.
284:76
Haec enim est gloria sanctorum Dei, hæc in hoc saeculo despicabilis militia, haec linguis omnium in detractionibus dissipata. Hic tunc patientiæ nostræ fructus, hæc sufferentiæ merces erit. Haec præmia pro nomine blasphematorum, subjectam sibi habere omnem animam superbam, et omnem extollentem hominem, potentissimos quondam reges mundi, et toto adoratos orbe cum manicis ferreis compedibusque sistendos, nobilesque eorum immanium pondera catenarum collo et cervicibus sustinentes, ante fulgorem illius augusti tribunalis, his quos aliquando contempserant, despexerant, irriserant, offerendos. Mutata enim vice, ut hoc sæculum lautorum sit, 138 aliud futurum credere miserorum.
因為這就是神眾聖徒的榮耀;這在今世乃是可鄙的爭戰;這被眾人的舌頭四散播成毀謗。這麼說來,這將是我們忍耐的果子;這是我們堅忍的賞賜。這些賞賜,是代替褻瀆者名聲而來的:使一切驕傲的魂、一切自高的人都服在其下;那昔日最有權勢、受全地敬拜的世上諸王,要被鐵鐐鐵銬鎖住,他們的貴胄要在頸項與肩背上擔負沉重鎖鏈的重量,在那威嚴審判之座的光輝前,被呈於那些他們曾藐視、輕看、譏笑之人的面前。因為命運已然反轉,以致這世代屬於奢華之人,人便可信將來的世代屬於困苦之人。
For this is the glory of the saints of God; this, in this world a despicable warfare; this, scattered abroad on the tongues of all in disparagements. This, then, shall be the fruit of our patience; this the reward of our endurance. These the rewards, in place of the name of blasphemers: to have subject to itself every proud soul, and every man that exalteth himself; the once most powerful kings of the world, adored throughout the whole earth, to be set with iron manacles and fetters, and their nobles bearing the weights of huge chains upon neck and shoulders before the splendor of that august tribunal, to be presented to those whom they once despised, looked down upon, and mocked. For the lot being changed, so that this age belongs to the sumptuous, one may believe the age to come belongs to the wretched.
284:77
enim divitibus, quoniam receperunt mercedem suam; sed illis divitibus quibus dicendum erit: Esurivi, et non dedistis mihi manducare; sitivi, et non potastis me (Matth. xxv). Illis utique divitibus qui de injusto mammona amicos facere noluerant, qui meditati sunt in cogitationibus suis, exuberante fructu, quo neminem refrigerabant, nova immensis fructibus receptacula moliri, a qui ubi in crastinum comederent ignorabant. Anima eorum eo tempore expostulabatur, sub una tamen nocte vana sollicitudine occupata, cum thesaurizare non cessaverint, nec defossis invigilare opibus omiserint. Hinc Lazarus pauper cum eo patriarcha qui peregrinus vixit in mundo, lætatur in cubili suo.
因為「你們富足的人有禍了,因為你們受過你們的安慰」(參路六);然而尤指那些必要被對他們說這話的富人:「我餓了,你們不給我吃;我渴了,你們不給我喝。」(太二十五)確實是指那些不肯用不義之財為自己結交朋友的富人;他們心中盤算,在果實滿溢、卻不叫任何人得舒暢之際,為浩大的收成建造新的倉房——卻不知明日在何處吃飯。他們的靈魂在那時被取去,只在一夜之間便被虛妄的憂慮所纏累,因他們積財不止,看守埋藏的財物毫不放鬆。因此,那貧窮的拉撒路,與那在世上作客旅而活的先祖一同,在自己的居所中歡樂。
For 'woe to the rich, for they have received their reward' (cf. Luke 6); but to those rich to whom it must be said: 'I was hungry, and ye gave me not to eat; I was thirsty, and ye gave me not to drink' (Matt. 25). To those rich, assuredly, who had refused to make friends of the unjust mammon; who meditated in their thoughts, when the fruit overflowed by which they refreshed no one, to build new storehouses for immense harvests — who knew not where they should eat on the morrow. Their soul was demanded of them at that time, occupied within a single night by vain solicitude, since they ceased not to lay up treasure, nor omitted to keep watch over buried wealth. Hence Lazarus the poor man, with that patriarch who lived as a stranger in the world, rejoices in his resting place.
284:78
At dives e contra, in aeternis flagrat incendiis, et omni expoliatus dignitate atque substantia, despecti quondam inopis divinumimplorat auxilium, ejusque vel minimo exoptat digitulo contingi, cujus egestatem inter opimas dapes suas et copiosa convivia ne micis quidem de mensa decidentibus sustentabat. Cum itaque præscriptum judicium per nos, id est per sanctos est celebrandum, nobis vindicta in nationes et in populos est donata. Quod cum cogitatar, quæ in nobis mens, quis ardor animi, quod desiderium futurorum, quis præsentium contemptus, facilius sentiri quam dici potest. Aut quis est qui non ad ista festinans, dissolvi se cupiat et esse cum Christo (Philip. I) ?
然而那財主卻正相反,在永火中焚燒,被剝去了一切尊嚴與財產,向他曾藐視的窮人懇求神聖的救助,渴望能被那人最小的小指頭指尖觸一下——就是他在自己豐盛的筵席與滿滿的宴樂中,連桌上掉下的碎屑都不肯供養的那人。既然那所定的審判要藉我們——就是藉聖徒——來施行,向列國與萬民施報的權柄便已賜給了我們。當人思念此事時,我們裡面存著何等的心思,何等的靈之熱忱,何等對將來之事的渴慕,何等對現今之事的藐視,這是易於感受過於言說的。或者,有誰急切奔向這些事,卻不巴不得離世與基督同在呢(腓一)?
But the rich man, on the contrary, burns in eternal fires, and, stripped of all dignity and substance, implores the divine aid of the poor man he once despised, and longs to be touched by even the smallest little finger of him whose destitution he sustained not, amid his rich banquets and abundant feasts, with so much as the crumbs falling from the table. Since, therefore, the prescribed judgment is to be celebrated through us — that is, through the saints — vengeance upon the nations and upon the peoples has been granted to us. When this is pondered, what mind is in us, what ardor of soul, what desire of things to come, what contempt of present things, can more easily be felt than told. Or who is there who, hastening to these things, would not desire to be dissolved and to be with Christ (Phil. 1)?
284:79
aut quid magnum est, si pro tantis ac talibus bonis mors contemnatur, pro quibus etiam hæc vita contemnenda est? Quoniam pro his qui perdiderit animam suam, salvat illam. At contra qui hic salvaverit animam suam perdet eam. Etenim cum plerique in hoc mundo velut furialibus flammis ita sint animi ambitione succensi, ut non opibus conditis, nec patrimoniis, Dee ipsis quoque filiis parcant, quos etiam de avaritia accusati opponere consueverunt, dum præfecturas consularitatesque mercentur, quas potestates et mors adimit, et successor excludit:
或者,若為了如此眾多、如此美好的福分而輕看死亡,這又有何偉大可言呢?連今生也當為這些福分的緣故而被輕看。因為「凡為這些福分喪掉自己性命的,必救了性命。」但反過來,「凡在此救自己性命的,必喪掉性命。」因為世上有極多的人,心靈被野心如同被狂暴的火焰所點燃,以致他們既不顧惜所積蓄的財富,也不顧惜產業,甚至連自己的兒子也不顧惜——當他們被控貪婪時,慣常把兒子搬出來作藉口——同時他們用錢購買總督與執政官之職,這些權位死亡會奪去,繼任者也會將人排擠出去:
Or what great thing is it, if for goods so many and so excellent death is held in contempt, goods for which even this present life ought to be held in contempt? For 'whoever loses his soul for their sake shall save it.' But, on the contrary, 'whoever here shall save his soul shall lose it.' For whereas very many in this world are so inflamed in spirit by ambition, as if by furious flames, that they spare neither their hoarded riches nor their patrimonies, nor even their own sons—whom, when they are accused of avarice, they are wont to put forward as an excuse—while they purchase prefectships and consulships, offices which death takes away and a successor shuts out:
284:80
quæ dementia est non ea potius impensis omnibus et detrimento vitæ ipsius comparare, quae promotos faciant vel de vitae æternitate securos, vel de judicii perpetua dignitate gloriosos ?, CAP. IX. — Tempus admonet, et locus ipse suggerit, nec materia videtur aliena, quoniam de meritis coepimus tractare sanctorum, ut b infelicissimae infelicitatis blasphemias diluamus quæ ad hanc videtur speciem pertinere.
那麼,若不寧可傾盡一切費用、甚至捨去生命本身,去換取那使被提拔者在永生上得穩妥、在審判永恆的尊榮上得榮耀的事物,這豈不是瘋狂嗎?第九章——時機提醒我們,此地本身也啟發我們,這題材也不顯得偏離,因為我們既已開始論述聖徒的功德,就當洗刷那極不幸之不幸所發出、似乎正屬此類的褻瀆之言。
what madness is it not rather to procure, at the cost of all one's expenses and at the loss of life itself, those things which make the advanced either secure concerning life eternal, or glorious concerning the perpetual dignity of the judgment? CHAP. IX.—The time admonishes us, the very place suggests it, nor does the subject-matter seem foreign, since we have begun to treat of the merits of the saints, that we may wash away the blasphemies of a most wretched wretchedness which seem to belong to this same theme.
284:81
Exstiterunt enim qui virtutes egregias et coelestes per sanctorum reliquias jam utique prope nostris temporibus operantes, maluerunt detractione mordere quam veneratione suscipere, antiquum illud venenum in Dei famulos Judaicæ infidelitatis evomentes, quod illi quondam in ipsum Dominum viperinis linguis et mortiferis sibilis effuderunt dicentes: In qua potestate hoc facis ? el quis tibi dedit hanc potestatem (Matth. xxv)? Recitabant namque nobis juxta positis, quæ divinis et beatissimis Gervasio et Protasio infidelitas stulta loquebatur, quos dum papæ Ambrosio aliquid decerpere machinantur, violare sacrilegis sermonibus non timebant, hoc modo rationem miraculorum conquirentes.
因為有些人興起,當眾聖徒的遺骸甚至在幾近我們這時代仍施行卓越而屬天的神蹟時,他們寧願以毀謗來咬齧這些神蹟,也不願以敬崇來領受,把猶太人不信的那古老毒液向神的僕人吐出——就是那些人從前用毒蛇般的舌頭和致命的嘶聲向主自己傾吐的:「你憑什麼權柄作這事?又是誰給你這權柄?」(太二十一章)因為他們向我們這些近旁站立的人複述那愚昧的不信對神聖至福的熱爾瓦削與普洛大削所說的話;他們一面圖謀從安博羅削主教身上奪去些什麼,一面竟不懼以褻瀆之言侵犯這二位聖徒,用這種方式來尋究神蹟的緣由。
For there have arisen men who, when eminent and heavenly virtues were being wrought through the relics of the saints even in almost our own times, chose rather to gnaw at them with detraction than to receive them with veneration, vomiting forth against the servants of God that ancient poison of Jewish unbelief which those men once poured out against the Lord Himself with viperous tongues and deadly hissings, saying: 'By what power do you do this? and who gave you this power?' (Matt. 21). For they were reciting to us, who stood near, the things which foolish unbelief was uttering against the divine and most blessed Gervasius and Protasius; and while they contrive to pluck something away from Pope Ambrose, they did not fear to violate them with sacrilegious words, seeking in this manner a rationale for the miracles.
284:82
Quid est istud, quod ex eo quod martyres sunt, virtutum dona meruerunt? Cur tam tarde quod jam pridem illis concessum est exercetur? Aut si ea tempestate cum passi sunt non ostenderunt, quomodo nunc operati sunt? Quid est hoc quod modo videntur ostendere? aut illos majores revelatione Ambrosius fecit c quam dignatio martyrii ? Agnoscitisne, aliis licet 139 verbis, ita mendaciter, quod de Domino prodidimus martyribus ingestum: In qua potestate hoc facis ? et quis tibi hanc dedit potestatem (Matth. XXI)? Tepida, ut arbitror, consolatio, et de livore generata, quaerere an divinum sit quod videas esse divinum; et rationem poscere, cum credere sit necesse. Et cum Apostolus dicat:
他們說:「這是怎麼回事,這些人單憑他們是殉道者,就配得神蹟的恩賜?為何早已賜給他們的能力,如今才這樣遲地施展出來?或者,若他們在受難的那場風暴中沒有顯出這些能力,如今又怎麼行出來了?他們如今所似乎顯出的,究竟是什麼?難道安博羅削藉著啟示,使他們比殉道的尊榮所造就的更為偉大嗎?」你們豈不認出——雖然用了別的言語,卻同樣虛謊地——我們已指出從前投向主的話,如今被堆在殉道者身上:「你憑什麼權柄作這事?又是誰給你這權柄?」(太二十一章)我認為,這是一種冷淡的安慰,且是由嫉妒所生的:去追問你所見顯然是屬神的,是否屬神;在必須信的時候卻索求緣由。況且使徒也說:
'What is this,' they say, 'that from the fact that they are martyrs, they should have merited the gifts of miracles? Why is that exercised so late which was granted to them long ago? Or if in that storm when they suffered they did not display these powers, how have they now wrought them? What is this that they now seem to display? Or did Ambrose make them greater by revelation than the dignity of martyrdom made them?' Do you recognize—though in other words, yet just as falsely—what we have shown was cast against the Lord, now heaped upon the martyrs: 'By what power do you do this? and who gave you this power?' (Matt. 21). A lukewarm consolation, I think, and one begotten of envy: to inquire whether that be divine which you see to be divine, and to demand a rationale when it is necessary to believe. And whereas the Apostle says:
284:83
Caritas omnia credit (I Cor. XIII): quis dubitat quod sine caritate Dei sunt qui fldem tantis non applicuere virtutibus? Negat autem fidem qui quasi tentator inquiti: Unde hæc potestas ? quasi non manifestum sit in ea sanctos martyres nunc in spiritu miracula facere, in qua potestate adversarios suos prius in carne et in passione vicerunt. Conferamus pedem contra istos ( si dici fas est) fllios Judæcorum, et ut nuper eorum parentem, id est Judæum, d qui se in sacriflcio prudentem nimium putabat, dono Deitatis oppressimus; ita et hancsub Christiano nomine blasphemiarum sobolem destruamus, per eum qui dixit: Perdam sapientiam sapientum, et prudentiam prudentium reprobabo (1 Cor. I):
「愛是凡事相信」(林前十三章):誰能懷疑,那些不肯把信德歸於如此偉大之神蹟的人,是缺乏神的愛的呢?凡像試探者一樣追問「這權柄從何而來?」的人,就是否認信德——好像聖潔的殉道者如今在聖神裡所行的神蹟,並非出於他們從前在肉身中、在受難時勝過仇敵所憑的那同一權柄,這事還不夠明顯似的。讓我們挺身抵擋這些猶太人的子孫(若可以這樣說),並且正如我們不久前藉神性的恩賜壓倒了他們的先祖,就是那自以為在獻祭上極其精明的猶太人一樣,也讓我們藉那位說「我要滅絕智慧人的智慧,廢棄聰明人的聰明」(林前一章)的主,摧毀這頂著基督徒之名的褻瀆之苗裔:
'Charity believes all things' (1 Cor. 13): who doubts that those are without the charity of God who have not applied faith to such great miracles? But he denies the faith who, like a tempter, inquires: 'Whence this power?'—as though it were not manifest that the holy martyrs now work miracles in the Spirit by that same power in which they formerly conquered their adversaries in the flesh and in their passion. Let us set foot against these (if it is right so to say) sons of the Jews, and, as lately we overwhelmed by the gift of the Godhead their parent, that is, the Jew, who thought himself exceedingly clever in his sacrifice, so let us also destroy this offspring of blasphemies under the Christian name, through Him who said: 'I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the prudence of the prudent I will reject' (1 Cor. 1):
284:84
ut et nos In triumpho gemino per Dominum gloriemur, et illi agnoscant intelligentiam rerum divinarum in fide catholica, non in sapientia sæculi constitutam, monente Domino: nisi credideritis, non intelligetis (Isai. VII): ut manifestius constet et fidelibus patere infidelitatis obscura, et ab infidelibus fidelitatis etiam plana non cerni. Forsitan quæras pro tua sollicitudine et vigilantia diligentiaque vitali, quæ fuerit illa quæstio in qua tropeum nobis Dominus de falso Israelita donavit. Referam nec tacebo, quoniam his rebus paginam tibi amas extendi.
如此,我們既可在藉主而得的雙重凱旋中誇口,他們也可承認:對屬神之事的理解乃立於大公信仰之中,而非立於世俗的智慧,正如主所訓誨的:「你們若不信,就不能明白」(賽七章):好叫這事更明顯地確立——不信之人所看不透的隱晦之事,對信徒卻是敞開的;而信仰中連淺顯明白之事,不信的人也看不見。或許,出於你的關切、警醒與活潑的殷勤,你會問:主在其中賜給我們勝過那假以色列人之凱旋標記的,究竟是怎樣的辯難?我要述說,決不緘默,因為你喜愛我為你多寫些這類的篇幅。
that both we may glory in a twofold triumph through the Lord, and they may acknowledge that the understanding of divine things is established in the catholic faith, not in the wisdom of the world, the Lord admonishing: 'Unless you believe, you shall not understand' (Isa. 7): so that it may stand more manifest both that the obscure things of unbelief lie open to the faithful, and that even the plain things of the faith are not discerned by the unbelieving. Perhaps, out of your solicitude and vigilance and vital diligence, you may ask what that question was in which the Lord granted us a trophy over the false Israelite. I will relate it and not keep silence, since you love to have the page for you extended with these matters.
284:85
Etsi enim non congrue necdum prioribus absolutis alia cæpta videantur interseri, tamen pro te malo aliqua etiam non suo ordine loqui, quam tuis mihi modo orationibus donata præterire. Quidam de inimicis crucis Christi, inter familiares Dei et quidem doctores, de scandalo illo gentis suae, quod in Dominum nostrum susceperunt, spiritu blasphemiæ Dominum pulsans protulit exempla de lege. Et ut quondam pater ejus homicida in pinna templi Dominum tentans, quid de ipso promissum esset in lege improbus prædicabat: ita hic, ne aut minus docte perfidiæ videretur, aut nudum pateret sine majori auctoritate mendacium: plura, ait, miracula propheta noster facit Eliseus, quam Dominus vester Christus.
因為雖然在先前的論題尚未了結之前就插入別的事看似不合宜,我卻寧願為你的緣故,甚至不按次序說些話,也不願略過如今藉你的禱告賜給我的。基督十字架的仇敵中有一人——竟廁身於神的親近者、且是教師之列——就他民族從前對我們主所懷的那樁絆倒之事,帶著褻瀆的靈攻擊主,從律法中舉出例證。正如從前他那兇手般的父親在殿頂上試探主,那不敬虔者引述律法中論到祂的應許:這人也是如此,唯恐在他的背信中顯得太過無學,或唯恐他的謊言赤裸裸地缺乏更大的權威支撐,便說:「我們的先知以利沙所行的神蹟,比你們的主基督更多。」
For although it may seem unsuitable to interweave other matters before the earlier ones are yet concluded, nevertheless for your sake I prefer to say some things even out of their proper order rather than to pass over what has now been granted to me by your prayers. A certain one of the enemies of the cross of Christ—among the intimates of God and indeed among teachers—concerning that scandal of his nation which they took up against our Lord, striking at the Lord with a spirit of blasphemy, brought forth examples from the Law. And as once his father, a murderer, tempting the Lord upon the pinnacle of the temple, the impious one alleged what had been promised concerning Him in the Law: so this man, lest he seem either too unlearned in his perfidy, or lest his falsehood lie bare without greater authority, said: 'Our prophet Elisha works more miracles than your Lord Christ.'
284:86
Nam cum pro magno Lazarum in lucem revocatum esse (Joan. XI) referatis, quid amplius dicere poteritis quam a vivo mortuum resuscitatum Profero quod verum esse etiam vestra confessione censetnr. Eliseus (II Reg. XIII) enim noster jam mortuus, appositis ossibus ejus mortuum quem juxta corpus ejus piratarum fugiens adventum, supremi officii deserens munus turba projecerat) exanimis animavit, et de frigidis ossibus atque exsangui corpore alienis cadaver vitali calore perfudit, nec quod habuit dedit; sed alii quod ipse tunc non habebat indulsit.
「因為你們把拉撒路被召回光中(約十一章)當作大事來述說,你們還能說出比『死人被活人所復活』更大的事嗎?我要舉出連你們自己也承認為真的事。因為我們的以利沙(王下十三章),在他已死之後,使一個放在他骸骨旁的死人復活了——那死人是逃避海盜來襲、拋下最後喪禮之職的一群人,倉皇擲在他身旁的;以利沙雖自己已無氣息,卻賜下生命,從冰冷的骸骨和無血的身軀,把生命的暖氣注入一具本不屬他的屍身;他所給的並非他所擁有的,反倒把他自己當時所沒有的,賜給了別人。」
'For whereas you relate as a great thing that Lazarus was called back into the light (John 11), what more will you be able to say than that a dead man was raised by one living? I bring forward what by your own confession also is reckoned to be true. For our Elisha (2 Kings 13), when already dead, restored to life a dead man laid beside his bones—a man whom the throng, fleeing the coming of pirates and abandoning the duty of the last office, had cast down beside his body; and, though himself lifeless, he gave life, and from cold bones and a bloodless body he poured vital warmth into a corpse that was not his own; nor did he give what he had, but he bestowed upon another what he himself then did not have.'
284:87
Hoc credo vobis majus caeteris virtutibus videatur, mortuum in auras vitales remissum esse per mortuum, et eo tempore quo ipso esset naturali lege constrictus, legem solvisse naturae. Hoc si præstat cunctis operationibus, cur hic potior non habeatur, quem tamen e prophetam et Dominum confitemur ? Aut si vel simile huic aliquid nostis, edicite, ut et honore præcellat, qui fuerit merito virtutis excellentior. Obstupuere ad haec dicta proceres nostri, et nullum referentes responsum, nec quod telum repercuterct producentes, pene sub inani adversarii machina inu. tilique ariete conciderunt:
「我想,這在你們看來或許比其他神蹟更大:一個死人藉著另一個死人被送回生命的氣息中,且正當他自己也被自然律所束縛之時,他竟解開了自然的律。若這事勝過一切作為,那麼我們既承認他為先知、為主,為何不當視他為更偉大的呢?或者,你們若知道有任何與此相似的事,就請說出來,好叫那在神蹟功德上更卓越者,也在尊榮上更超群。」聽了這些話,我們的首領們都驚愕失措,答不出一言,也拿不出任何武器回擊,幾乎在仇敵那空洞的攻城器械與無用的撞城槌之下潰敗了:
'This, I believe, may seem to you greater than the other miracles: that a dead man was sent back into the airs of life through a dead man, and at the very time when he himself was bound by the natural law, he loosed the law of nature. If this excels all other works, why should not he be held the greater whom nevertheless we confess to be a prophet and a lord? Or if you know anything even similar to this, declare it, that he too may excel in honour who has been more excellent in the merit of miracle.' At these words our chief men were astounded, and, returning no answer, nor bringing forth any weapon with which to strike back, they well-nigh collapsed beneath the empty engine and useless battering-ram of the adversary:
284:88
adeo ut ille, qui profuga omnium, ut aiunt, esse debuisset, etiam victoris gloriam sine certamine 140 reportaret. Quod ubi mihi est nuntiatum, ingemui tantam nobis inesse negligentiam, ut nec veritatem possimus astruere, cum alii valeant inculcare pro veritate mendacium; rogatoque Domino, quoniam nihil nostrum est, ut suis arma suggereret,f quo ejus ignaviæ auferretur opprobrium. Cedo mihi, inquam, istum magniloquium dicentem: labia nostra a nobis, quis noster Dominus est (Psal. XI)? Proferam profecto per eum qui disperdit linguam magoiloquam. ut intelligant domino famulum non aequandum, licet ipsi noverint Judæi prophetas veteres nulla miracula propriis edidisse virtutibus.
以致那人——按他們所說,本該是眾人中最當逃遁的——竟不經交戰便奪得了勝者的榮耀。這事報告給我時,我為我們裡面竟有如此大的疏懶而哀嘆:我們連真理都無法確立,別人卻能以謊言取代真理、深植人心;於是我懇求主,因為我們一無所有,求祂把兵器供給自己的人,好除去他們怯懦的羞辱。我說:「把那說『我們的嘴唇是我們自己的,誰能作我們的主呢?』(詩十二篇)的自誇者交給我。」我必藉那滅絕自誇之舌的主,使他們明白:僕人不可與他的主同列——縱然猶太人自己也知道,古時的先知並沒有憑自己的能力行過任何神蹟。
so much so that that man, who—as they say—ought to have been the fugitive of all, carried off even the victor's glory without a contest. When this was reported to me, I groaned that so great a negligence was in us, that we could not even establish the truth, while others were able to press home a falsehood in the place of truth; and, having besought the Lord, since nothing is our own, that He would furnish arms to His own, whereby the reproach of their cowardice might be taken away. 'Yield me,' I said, 'that boaster who says: Our lips are our own; who is Lord over us? (Ps. 12).' I will surely bring forth, through Him who destroys the boastful tongue, that they may understand that a servant is not to be equalled with his Lord—although the Jews themselves know that the ancient prophets performed no miracles by their own powers.
284:89
Denique ipse Eliseus (If Reg. II) cum spiritu magitri hæreditatus, velut insolentior donorum remuneratione venisset, Mandere tamen aquas, nisi sub Dei invocatione non potuit. bea fateor ipsius nanc quae proposita est interim fuisse virtutem, ut major aloria nostræ iidei sit, si tentationem etiam dum credimus opprimamus. Quid ais, Domini blasphemator? Eliseus, inquit, ipse mortuus alium mortuum contactu sui corporis suscitavit. Hoc loco plene, ut in omnibus Domino suo prophetæ virtus ansurgat, quae in Domino Jesu Christo, cum sepulcrum eius lapidibus infidelitas vestra muniret, lapidem milites obsederent, credo, ne resurrectio ejus idoneis testibus indigeret.
總之,以利沙自己(王下二章),當他承受了他師傅之靈的雙倍分、彷彿因所得恩賜之報而更顯膽壯地前來時,仍非藉呼求神之名不能分開河水。但我承認,這被舉出的神蹟,暫且算作是他自己的,好使我們信仰的榮耀更大——如果我們在相信的同時也壓制住那試探。你怎麼說呢,褻瀆主的人?他說:「以利沙自己已死,卻藉他身體的觸碰使另一死人復活了。」在這一點上——好叫先知的能力在凡事上都向他的主歸升——那同一能力也在主耶穌基督裡:當你們的不信用石頭堅固祂的墳墓、兵丁圍守那石頭之時,我想,正是為使祂的復活不缺乏合適的見證人。
In fine, Elisha himself (2 Kings 2), when he had inherited a twofold portion of his master's spirit and had come, as it were more insolent, at the recompense of gifts, nevertheless could not part the waters except under the invocation of God. But I confess that this very miracle which has been set forth was for the meanwhile his own, so that there may be the greater glory of our faith, if we crush the temptation even while we believe. What do you say, blasphemer of the Lord? 'Elisha,' he says, 'himself dead, raised another dead man by the contact of his body.' In this passage—that in all things the prophet's power may rise up toward his Lord—that same power was present in the Lord Jesus Christ, when your unbelief was fortifying His sepulchre with stones, and soldiers were besieging the stone, in order, I believe, that His resurrection might not lack suitable witnesses.
284:90
Nam resurrecturum, si volebatis oredere, noveratis; subito enim ille infernis terne cardinibus concussis, cum atupore militum et ruina saxoruip non alium aliquem, sese suscitavit in lucem. Elisei hæc propria dona, Ii fuissent, sibi dare maluisset; nec præstare alii poterat quo indigeret sibi. Denique hoc majus esse vestri etiam prodiderunt majores, dum Dominum in cruce deriderent, dicentes: Alios salvos fecit, scipsum salvum faciat; descendat de cruce, et credimus ei (Matth. XXVII). Vestrorum ergo sententia vincimus. Vestri promiserunt se credituros esse si præstitisset sibi quod aliis praestare consuevisset. Cur non creditis, quod esse præstantius non negatis.
因為你們若肯相信,早已知道祂必復活;因為祂忽然間,當陰間的門樞被震動、兵丁驚駭、磐石崩裂之時,所復活進入光中的並非某個別人,而是祂自己。這些若真是以利沙自己固有的恩賜,他必寧願賜給自己;他也不能把自己所缺乏的賜給別人。總之,這事更為偉大,連你們自己的長輩也曾宣告過,當他們在十字架上譏誚主,說:「他救了別人,讓他救自己吧;讓他從十字架上下來,我們就信他」(太二十七章)。因此,我們是憑你們自己的判決而得勝。你們自己的人曾應許,若祂把慣常施給別人的施給自己,他們就要相信。你們既不否認這事更為卓越,為何不信呢?
For you knew, if you had been willing to believe, that He would rise again; for suddenly He, when the hinges of the nether world had been shaken, amid the stupefaction of the soldiers and the falling of the rocks, raised not some other man, but Himself, into the light. Had these been Elisha's own proper gifts, he would have preferred to give them to himself; nor could he bestow upon another that which he lacked for himself. In fine, that this is the greater, your own elders too declared, while they mocked the Lord upon the cross, saying: 'He saved others, let Him save Himself; let Him come down from the cross, and we will believe Him' (Matt. 27). By your own verdict, therefore, we conquer. Your own men promised that they would believe if He should bestow upon Himself what He had been accustomed to bestow upon others. Why do you not believe what you do not deny to be more excellent?
284:91
Nemo certe hanc habuit potestatem. Denique et Dominus dic it de anima sua: Potestatem habeo ponendi eam, ei potestatem habeo resumendi eam (Joan. x). Recense superbas majorum tuorum imagines, et patriarcharum retexe virtutes, et invenies quis talem habuit potestatem. Quare non ei credam ut possit liberare animam meam, qui potuit et suam? Plura dicturo suggessit recordatio volumen crescere, et ideo cursum hujus quaestionis esse revocandum, quoniam adhuc prior illa astat in januis, cui aeque sua spatia, etsi babenis restrictioribus, tamen adhuc illibata debentur. Et vere non fuerunt neeessario in hac parte multa dicenda, ne et ille cresceret:
確實沒有別人有過這樣的權柄。總之,主論到自己的性命也說:「我有權柄捨了它,也有權柄取回它」(約十章)。你去查考你祖先那些驕傲的圖像,展開列祖的偉業,你就會發現究竟誰曾有過這樣的權柄。那位連自己的性命都能救的,為何我不信祂能救我的性命呢?我正想再多說時,回想提醒我這卷冊正在增長,因而這辯題的進程當予收回,因為先前那論題仍立在門口,它也理當有它自己的篇幅——雖以更緊的韁繩約束,卻仍未曾觸及。實在說,在這一部分不必說太多,免得那論題也隨之膨脹:
Certainly no one else had this power. In fine, the Lord too says of His own soul: 'I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it up again' (John 10). Review the proud images of your forefathers, and unfold again the mighty deeds of the patriarchs, and you will find who had such a power. Why should I not believe that He is able to deliver my soul, who was able to deliver His own also? As I was about to say more, the recollection suggested that the volume was growing, and that therefore the course of this question ought to be recalled, since that former question still stands at the doors, to which likewise its own space is owed—though with tighter reins, yet still untouched. And indeed there was no need for many things to be said in this part, lest that one too should grow:
284:92
si tamen magnum protulisse aliquid putaret se, quod quaereret prolixa disputatione victoriam, cujus non sapientiam, quae nulla in eo erat, sed superbiam, quæ abundat, infrelimus.. CAP. X.—Repudiato vero isto Israelita vel ne pugnam se fecisse gloriaretur (quandoquidem, quæ diximus instructionem nostrorum potius quam ad illorum certamen conflictumque protulimus, qui nec tunc vult credere cum vincitur), ne aut sanctum eanibus impudenter dedisse, aut margaritas porcis (Matth. VII) sparsisse judicemur, revertendum est illuc unde ad istum locum pene præcisis sensuum tramitibus deviavi; et oves domus Israel diligentius circumeundae sunt:
也就是說,假使他自以為提出了什麼大不了的事,想以冗長的辯論博取勝利——但我們所要挫敗的,並非他的智慧(他裡面根本沒有),而是他那滿溢的驕傲。第十章——然而這以色列人既被駁回——免得他誇口說自己作了一場爭戰(因為我們所說的話,乃是為教導我們自己的人而提出,而非為與那些即使被駁倒也不肯信的人爭辯較量)——又免得我們被判為無恥地把聖物給了狗,或把珍珠丟在豬前(太七章)——我們就必須回到我幾乎沿著中斷的思路岔開到此處之前的原點;以色列家的羊也當更殷勤地被巡視:
supposing, that is, that he thought he had brought forward something great, so as to seek victory by a prolix disputation—one whose wisdom (which was none in him) but whose pride (which abounds) we break. CHAP. X.—But this Israelite being rejected—lest he boast that he had made a fight of it (seeing that the things we have said we brought forward for the instruction of our own people rather than for a contest and conflict with those who will not believe even when they are conquered)—lest we be judged either to have shamelessly given what is holy to the dogs, or to have scattered pearls before swine (Matt. 7), we must return thither whence, by paths of sense almost cut off, I have wandered to this place; and the sheep of the house of Israel must be more diligently gone round:
284:93
quoniam si caritas Dei in nobis est, quis infirmatur et ego non infirmor ? quis scandalizatur et ego non uror (I Cor. XI)? Docendique magis sunt, ne usque ad blasphemias loquantur, si forte aut non teneant, aut non intelligant prophetata. Quærunt an divina virtus sit quae nuDe cœpit in martyribus apparere. 141 Cujus legis homines hoc requirunt ? nempe Christianæ, quæ sic est prophetationibus instructa, ut nihil tam novum, tam inopinatum nostris temporibus possit iugruere, quod fides non admiretur electior, aut a blaspbemetur infirmior. Omnia usque ad DomInum prophetæ veteres praedixerunt. Omnia post Dominum quae deerant, apostoli prophetarunt:
因為,若神的愛在我們裡面,「有誰軟弱,我不軟弱呢?有誰跌倒,我不焦急呢?」(林後十一章)。他們反倒該受教導,免得他們甚至墮入褻瀆,倘若他們或不持守、或不明白那些預言。他們追問,如今開始在殉道者身上顯現的,是否為屬神的能力。是哪一律法之下的人如此要求呢?無疑是基督信仰之下的人,這信仰滿有預言的教導,以致在我們這時代無論有何等新奇、何等意想不到之事臨到,那更精純的信仰都會欽羨,而較軟弱的則褻瀆。直到主為止的一切,古時的先知都預言了;主之後所缺的一切,使徒都預言了:
since, if the charity of God is in us, 'who is weak, and I am not weak? who is made to stumble, and I do not burn?' (2 Cor. 11). And they are rather to be taught, lest they proceed even to blasphemies, if perchance they either do not hold, or do not understand, the things prophesied. They ask whether that be a divine power which has now begun to appear in the martyrs. Men of what law require this? Surely of the Christian, which is so instructed with prophecies that nothing so new, so unexpected, can befall in our times, but that the more choice faith admires it, or the weaker blasphemes it. All things, up to the Lord, the ancient prophets foretold. All things after the Lord which were lacking, the apostles prophesied:
284:94
beato Paulo per libertatem sancti Spiritus non tacente, qui ait: Ex parte scimus et ex parte prophetamus (II Cor. XIII): non quod omnia,eiciat aut omnia non pro phetet in quo presertim loquitur Christus; sed ex parte de toto prophetat, et ex parte de toto scit. Prophetat nobis id quod scit illius temporis esse quod futurum erat. Quod vero prophetat, venturas utique prophetizat ætati. Prophetat autem totum, etsi prophetat ex parte. Hæc enim prophetat quorum apertione pars ejus temporis quæ usque ad finem superest indigebat. Ex parte ergo prophetat, quoniam jam ex parte fuerat prophetatum: et ideo propheta sciebat ventura quæ prophetabat.
至福的保羅,藉聖神的自由,並不緘默,他說:「我們所知道的有限,所預言的也有限」(林前十三章):這並非說他把一切都棄置不顧,或不預言一切——他正是那位基督特別藉以說話的人——而是他就那全體作部分的預言,就那全體作部分的認識。他向我們預言他所知道屬於那將要來之時候的事。而他所預言的,確乎是向那將要來的世代預言的。然而他雖只作部分的預言,卻是預言那全體。因為他所預言的,正是那直到末了尚存留的時段所需要被揭示的部分。所以他只作部分的預言,因為部分已經被預言過了:因此先知知道他所預言的將來之事。
blessed Paul, through the liberty of the Holy Spirit, not keeping silence, who says: 'We know in part, and we prophesy in part' (1 Cor. 13): not that he casts out all things, or does not prophesy all things—he in whom especially Christ speaks—but he prophesies of the whole in part, and knows of the whole in part. He prophesies to us that which he knows to belong to that time which was to come. But that which he prophesies, he assuredly prophesies to the age that is to come. Yet he prophesies the whole, even though he prophesies in part. For these things he prophesies, of whose disclosure that portion of the time which remains until the end had need. In part, therefore, he prophesies, since in part it had already been prophesied: and therefore the prophet knew the things to come which he was prophesying.
284:95
Cujus prophetiæ particulas plenitudo, ut ipse dixit, temporis abolevit, hoc medo: Cum venerit quod perfectum eat, quod ex parte est destruetur (Ibid.): scilicet cum in conclusione mundi, nec scientia major, nec prophetia ulterius sit quaerenda. Denique intelligentiae istius virtutem, ut apertius demonstraret, subjunxit: Videmus nunc per speculum in ænigmate; tunc autem faCie ad faciem (Ibid).
正如他自己所說,時候的圓滿已用這樣的方式廢去了那預言的零碎部分:「那完全的來到,這有限的就要被廢去」(同上):也就是說,當世界終結之時,就不再需要尋求更大的知識或預言了。總之,為要更明白地彰顯那理解的能力,他又加上說:「我們如今彷彿對著鏡子在謎中觀看,到那時就要面對面了」(同上)。
The particles of which prophecy the fullness of time, as he himself said, has abolished, in this manner: 'When that which is perfect shall have come, that which is in part shall be destroyed' (ibid.): namely, when, at the conclusion of the world, neither greater knowledge nor prophecy is any longer to be sought. In fine, that he might more openly demonstrate the power of that understanding, he added: 'We see now through a glass in an enigma; but then face to face' (ibid.).
284:96
Per figuram interim sunt universa, et quibusdam imaginum lineis obumbrata, ut infirmitas carnis nostrae terrenaque substantia magis se ad spiritualium extenderet veritatem, ut ea illi desiderium pulchritudinis suæ etiam h per speculum tenuiter offensa faceret, quantaque Ipsa esset in sua substantia nos doceret, cum tam admirabilis etiam in repercussis luce sua ænigmatibus appareret: et ideo non per speculum pollicita conspicimus, non tamen propter virtutum merita possidemus: et obscura adhuc luce miramur, non tradita tenemus. Tune vero prophetia scientiaque cessabunt, cum in ipsam promissionum omnium virtutem quæ promittebatur erit ingressus.
因為目前萬物都是藉著表象,並被某些圖像的輪廓所掩蔽,好叫我們肉體的軟弱與屬地的本質,更能向屬靈事物的真理伸展;好叫那對它自身之美的渴慕——雖只如隔鏡般微弱地觸及——為它成就此事,並教導我們:那美在其本體中是何等偉大,因為連在它自身之光所反照的謎中,它就已顯得如此可歎服:因此我們並非藉著鏡子而是隔著鏡子仰望所應許之物,然而我們並非憑自己德行的功績而擁有它們;當光仍隱晦時,我們讚歎,卻不能如已交付於我們般持守它們。但到那時,預言與知識就要止息,那時便進入了那被應許之一切應許的能力本身。
For the meanwhile all things are through a figure, and overshadowed by certain outlines of images, so that the weakness of our flesh and our earthly substance might the more stretch itself toward the truth of spiritual things; so that the desire of its own beauty, even faintly encountered as through a glass, might do this for it, and might teach us how great that beauty is in its own substance, when it appears so admirable even in its reflected enigmas by its own light: and therefore we behold the things promised not through the glass, yet we do not possess them by the merits of our virtues; and while the light is still obscure we marvel, we do not hold them as delivered to us. But then indeed prophecy and knowledge shall cease, when there shall have been an entering into the very power of all the promises which was being promised.
284:97
Hinc etiam prophetia semper obscura est, quod alio tempore canitur, alio cernitur. Quod dicitur dum non videtur, quasi non prædictum non cre ditur. Denique Isaias cum redemptionem nostram tanto ante in Virginis utero meruisset agnoscere, eamque velut jam praesentem populo demonstraret, dicens: Ecce virgo concipiet et pariet filium, et vocabitur nomen ejus Emmanuel (Isai. VII); præsentem et futuram infidelium Israelitarum turbavit ætatem. Nam et illi veteres prophetam suum, quoniam non viderent c quae ostendit, interemerunt; et hi prophetatum sibi, d quoniam prophetiam non receperunt, occiderunt.
因此,預言也總是隱晦的,因為它在一個時候被歌頌,卻在另一個時候被看清。凡在尚未被看見時所說的,便如同未曾被預言般不被相信。總之,以撒亞先知,當他在如此久遠之前就配得認出我們在童貞女腹中的救贖,並將它如同已然臨在般指給百姓看,說:「看哪,必有童貞女懷孕生子,人要稱他的名為以馬內利」(賽七章);他使當時與後來不信的以色列世代都不安。因為古時那些人殺了他們自己的先知,因他們沒有看見先知所指明的;而這些人殺了那向他們所預言的一位,因他們沒有領受那預言。
Hence too prophecy is always obscure, because it is chanted at one time and discerned at another. That which is spoken while it is not yet seen is, as if it had not been foretold, not believed. In fine, Isaiah, when so long beforehand he had merited to recognize our redemption in the Virgin's womb, and was showing it to the people as if already present, saying: 'Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and his name shall be called Emmanuel' (Isa. 7); he troubled both the present and the future age of the unbelieving Israelites. For those men of old slew their own prophet, because they did not see the things which he pointed out; and these men slew Him who was prophesied to them, because they did not receive the prophecy.
284:98
Quod ne nobis etiam adcidat praecavendum est, si eos quos prior aetas insecuta est, nostra blasphemet. Et quoniam, ut diximus, quod praedictum fuerat venit, venturum nihil est quod non fuerit ante prædictum, Domino ipso sic dicente: Ecce prædixi vobis omnia (Marc. XIII). Videamus potius si hæc aliquando majorum auribus probantur infusa, quæ modo nostris oculis tanquam impleta finguntur. Videamus si hæc omnia operatur unus atque idem Spiritus (I Cor. xn). Si denique nec angelus de cælo evangelizet praeterquam evangelizatum est nobis: licet ipse, quae nunt virtutes Domini, per dæmonum tormenta testentur, quando Satanas 142 non dejiciat Satanam:
我們也當謹防這事臨到自己,免得我們這世代褻瀆前一世代所逼迫的人。既然如我們所說,那預先被預言的已經來到,就沒有任何將來之事不是預先被預言的,正如主自己所說:「看哪,我凡事都預先告訴你們了」(可十三章)。我們倒要察看,如今在我們眼前被假想為已應驗的這些事,是否曾一度被證實灌入了我們祖先的耳中。我們要察看,是否同一位聖神運行這一切(林前十二章)。總之,我們要察看,即或有天上來的天使,是否會傳與那傳給我們的不同之福音:雖然主如今所行的能力,正藉眾鬼的痛苦被見證,因為「撒但不趕逐撒但」:
And that this may not befall us also is to be guarded against, if our age should blaspheme those whom a former age persecuted. And since, as we have said, that which had been foretold has come, there is nothing to come which was not foretold beforehand, the Lord Himself so saying: 'Behold, I have foretold you all things' (Mark 13). Let us rather see whether these things, which now are feigned before our eyes as though fulfilled, were at some time proved to be poured into the ears of our forefathers. Let us see whether one and the same Spirit works all these things (1 Cor. 12). Let us see, in fine, whether even an angel from heaven should evangelize otherwise than what has been evangelized to us: although the very powers of the Lord which now are, are attested through the torments of demons, since 'Satan does not cast out Satan':
284:99
quia uniformitas nequitiæ indivisa naturaliter societate conflata, similitudinis accessione non detrimentum sui metuat, sed capiat augmentum. Nam et multos in unius formam ° legionis pravitatis spiritus, et iniquitatis viperinæ confœderatio conglobaverat; nec sibi oberat multitudo, quae, sicut acquirebat miseram sociata infirmitate virtutem, ita formidabat incurrere f divisa permissione inanis substantiae va. cuitatem. CAP. XI.- Sed hac parte interim argumentationis emissa, sicut proposuimus, ea quae in ecclesiis Domini sanctorumque cœmetetiis admiramur, credenda esse divinitus fieri, si prophetata fuerint, comprobemus.
因為邪惡的劃一性,由本性上不可分割的團契所熔鑄而成,並不因相似之物的加入而懼怕自身受虧損,反倒從中得增添。因為邪惡之靈已把許多聚攏成一「軍」的形狀,就是毒蛇般不義的聯盟;那眾多對它並無妨害,這眾多既藉聯合的軟弱獲得可憐的力量,也就懼怕在被允許分散時,陷入空洞本質的虛空。第十一章——然而這部分的論證暫且擱下,讓我們照所提議的來證明:我們在主的眾教會、在聖徒的墳場所欽羨的那些事,若曾被預言,就當信是出於神的作為。
because the uniformity of wickedness, welded together by a fellowship naturally undivided, does not fear detriment to itself by the accession of likeness, but takes increase. For the spirit of wickedness had massed together many into the form of one legion, and the confederacy of viperous iniquity; nor did the multitude harm it, which, just as it acquired a wretched strength by an allied infirmity, so it dreaded to incur, when divided by permission, the emptiness of an empty substance. CHAP. XI.—But this part of the argumentation being for the meanwhile sent forth, let us, as we proposed, prove that those things which we admire in the churches of the Lord and in the cemeteries of the saints ought to be believed to be done divinely, if they have been prophesied.
284:100
Atque in hac tam dura difficilique materia, nec ab aliquo ante pertractata, Dominum consulere deberemus, si cessante merito repudiari non timeremus prae audacia: quoniam quæ ipsius sunt, nemo extra ipsum poterit explicare. Etenim mirum unde miseris tanta fIducia, onde est interpellandi Dominnm familiaritas tam amica, ut in hanc vocem audeamua crumpere: Osculetur me osculo oris sui (Canl. I). Quis tantum concepit optatum? Quis tam grandia voLa sui aestimator uegligens suspiravit, ut ipsius os cominus concupiscat attingere; atque vel utinam nos I eorum dignetur osculo, quos ipse dignatus est osculari:
在這如此艱難、且從未有人處理過的事上,我們本當求問主——只要我們不因功德虧缺、又因我們的膽大而懼怕被拒絕:因為屬祂的事,除祂以外無人能解明。因為這實在奇妙:可憐之人從何得如此的膽量,向主呼求何以有如此親切的親密,以致我們敢迸出這樣的話:「願他用口與我親嘴」(歌一章)。誰曾懷有這樣大的渴望?誰竟如此輕忽地估量自己這樣重大的心願,而歎息渴望就近觸及祂的口;但願祂至少肯以那些祂親自屈尊親吻之人的親吻來看我們為配得:
And in this matter, so hard and difficult, and not before handled by anyone, we ought to consult the Lord, if only, when merit fails, we did not fear to be rejected on account of our audacity: since the things which are His, no one apart from Him will be able to explain. For it is a marvel whence there is such confidence for the wretched, whence there is a familiarity so friendly in appealing to the Lord, that we should dare to break forth into this utterance: 'Let him kiss me with the kiss of his mouth' (Cant. 1). Who has conceived so great a longing? Who, so negligent an estimator of his own so great vows, has sighed that he may desire to touch His mouth close at hand; and would that He might deem us worthy at least of the kiss of those whom He Himself has deigned to kiss:
284:101
ut in secundis postremi tertiisque sistentes, de eorum labiis aliquam ex parte scientiam trahere mereamur, qui totam sapientiæ plenitudinem de Domini ipsius ore didicerunt. Quanquam, etsi magnorum meritorum privilegiis fulciremur, posita erant in exemplis, velut alta quædam repetita fundamina verecundiæ: ne quid indecens et mordinatæ praesumptio levitatis auderet. Quid tam electius beato Petro ? Quid ad spem erectius? Quid liberius in fide, quam oris sui osculo Dominus se osculaturum esse promisit, dicens: Tibi dabo claves regni cælorum; et illud: Super hanc petram ædificabo Ecclesiam meam (Matth. xvi).
好叫我們這站在第二、末後、第三位次上的人,配得從他們的唇上汲取部分的知識,就是那些從主自己口中學得全部智慧之圓滿的人。然而,即使我們有偉大功德的特權為依恃,仍有榜樣擺在我們面前,如同某些深深重述的謙遜之根基:免得妄自尊大敢作任何不合宜、混亂輕浮之事。有什麼比至福的伯多祿更精選的呢?有什麼比他更被高舉以致有望的呢?有什麼在信德上比他更自由的呢?主應許要用祂口中的親吻與他親嘴,說:「我要把天國的鑰匙給你」;又有那一句:「我要把我的教會建造在這磐石上」(太十六章)。
that we, standing in the second and last and third places, may merit to draw some knowledge in part from their lips, who learned the whole fullness of wisdom from the mouth of the Lord Himself. And yet, even if we were upheld by the privileges of great merits, examples had been set before us, like certain deep-repeated foundations of modesty: lest presumption should dare anything unseemly and of disordered levity. What more choice than blessed Peter? What more uplifted unto hope? What more free in faith, to whom the Lord promised that He would kiss him with the kiss of His mouth, saying: 'To you I will give the keys of the kingdom of heaven'; and that other word: 'Upon this rock I will build my Church' (Matt. 16)?
284:102
Tamen hic pondere se quodam pudoris incurvans, iiduciam quam elatior habebat ex merito, verecundior ad interroganda submittit, cum in coenaDomini non per se quis Dominum esset traditurus inquirit, humiliterque pudibundus osculum Domini ore petit alieno: quod illi, etsi apud Dominum fiducia erat, ut subinde etiam homiui inconcussa præsumeret, ut ibi, cum per maria gradientem Dominum audet poscere ut ipsum pariter, solidata sub vestigiis aquarum terga sustentent, aliquid sibi diffidentior, sed consultior nobis, quibus suo actu imitabiles formas tanquam in speculo collocabat. Si per legatum pr.cscientiam Domini cautus explorat, quid hac instructione dignius ?
然而在此,他因某種謙遜的重負而俯下自己,把他從功德而來、原本更高昂的信心,更謙卑地降下以便提問——當在主的晚餐上,他不親自詢問誰要出賣主,卻謙卑而羞怯地藉別人的口求主的親吻:這事雖然他向主是有信心的,以致他隨即甚至能對那人毫不動搖地放膽——如同在那裡,當主行走海面時,他敢求連凝固於水面下的水背也照樣托住他自己的腳——他對自己雖稍有不自信,對我們卻更有遠慮,因他藉自己的行為,如同在鏡中為我們陳設可供效法的樣式。他若藉一位代言者謹慎地探察主的預知,還有什麼比這教訓更可貴呢?
Yet here, bowing himself down by a certain weight of modesty, the confidence which more loftily he had from merit he more modestly submits for the asking of questions, when at the Supper of the Lord he inquires not by himself who was to betray the Lord, and humbly, out of bashfulness, seeks the kiss of the Lord through another's mouth: which, although he had confidence with the Lord, so that thereupon he would even presume unshaken toward the man—as there, when he dares to ask that, as the Lord walks through the seas, the solidified backs of the waters may likewise sustain himself upon their footing—being somewhat more diffident for himself, but more provident for us, to whom by his own act he was setting forth imitable forms as if in a mirror. If through a delegate he cautiously explores the foreknowledge of the Lord, what is more worthy than this instruction?
284:103
Quid hac consulendi arte subtilius, " quod nos facere debemus, quibus cum fiducia nullius sit meriti, debet esse saltem pudor exempli, imitantes vel in hac parte beatum Petrum, qui non solum qua humilitate, verum etiam per quæ ad desiderata pervenire possimus, ostendit. Ab illo absolutionem quæstionis bujus, quem ipse non erubuit interrogare, quæramus. Ab illo, inquam, qui in ipso Domini pectore, velut super arcam Novi Veterisque Testamenti recumbens; non modo ad vestibulum aliquorum divinorum oraculorum diligens inquisitor accessit, sed ipsum penetrale secretæ dispositionis tanquam familiaris sacerdos intravit;
還有什麼比這求問的藝術更精微的呢?——這正是我們所當作的,因為我們既無功德可恃,就至少當有榜樣的謙遜,甚至在這一點上效法至福的伯多祿,他不僅指明我們當以何等的謙卑,也指明我們藉何等途徑能達到所渴慕之事。讓我們向他尋求這問題的解答,他自己都不以求問為恥。我說,就向那位倚靠在主胸膛上、如同倚靠在新約舊約之約櫃上的人尋求;他不僅如殷勤的探究者來到某些屬神神諭的門廊前,更如親近的祭司進入了那隱祕安排的至聖所本身;
What is more subtle than this art of consulting—which we ought to do, we for whom, since there is confidence of no merit, there ought at least to be the modesty of the example, imitating even in this part blessed Peter, who showed not only by what humility, but also through what means we may be able to arrive at the things desired? From him let us seek the resolution of this question, whom he himself was not ashamed to interrogate. From him, I say, who reclining upon the very breast of the Lord, as upon the ark of the New and the Old Testament, approached not only to the vestibule of certain divine oracles as a diligent inquirer, but entered the very inner sanctuary of the secret disposition as a familiar priest;
284:104
et ideo solus vidit in principio Verbum, quando illi velut exterior sacrosancti 143 templi ara, sic interior metienda. committitur.ipse nos de eo libro quem septem signaculis clausum flevit, reseratumque lætatus est, non per aliquem pseudotypum, sed per patentes januas in suum pectus veritatis inducat. CAP. XII.-Atqui ne dum consulitur, immoremur, praevenit inquirentes etiam præscientiæ compendio: quod trepidum aliquando nostris mentibus futurum cernebat, illuminat. Reddit etiam velut percunctatus responsa de Patmos. De eo utique loco ubi cœlorum secreta, præclusa Caesari, non alienus intravit, et angelorum sacramenta pulsus ab hominum conversatione cognovit. Ait enim:
因此,唯獨他在起初看見了「道」,那時彷彿把那內在的祭壇交給他去度量,正如那至聖之殿外在的祭壇一樣。願他就那卷書引領我們——那用七印封閉、他為之哭泣、又因見它被開啟而歡喜的書卷——不藉任何虛假的預表,而是藉敞開的門,領我們進入他自己那真理的胸懷。第十二章——再者,免得我們在求問他時遲延,他甚至以預知的捷徑先於發問者:他所看出將來某時要使我們心思恐懼的,他予以光照。他也彷彿被問及一般,從帕特摩島作出回答。無疑是從那地方——他並非以外人的身分,進入了對凱撒封閉的諸天奧祕,並且被逐出人間交往,得知了眾天使的奧祕。因為他說:
and therefore he alone saw in the beginning the Word, when to him, as it were, is committed the interior altar to be measured, just as the exterior altar of the most holy temple. May he lead us concerning that book which, closed with seven seals, he wept over and rejoiced to see unsealed, not through any false type, but through open doors, into his own breast of truth. CHAP. XII.—And moreover, lest we linger while he is being consulted, he anticipates the inquirers even by a compendium of foreknowledge: what he discerned would at some time be fearful to our minds, he illumines. He renders also, as if questioned, responses from Patmos. From that place, surely, where he, not as a stranger, entered the secrets of the heavens closed to Caesar, and, driven from the converse of men, came to know the mysteries of the angels. For he says:
284:105
b Vidi sub ara Dei animas occisorum marturum propter verbum Dei et testimonium Jesu, quod habebant; et datæ sunt illis singulæ stolæ; et clamaverunt voce magna dicentes: Usquiquo, Domine, sanctus et verus non vindicas sanguinem nostrum ab his qui in terris habitant? Et datæ sunt eis singulæ stolæ albæ, et dictum est eis, ut requiescant adhuc parvo tempore, donec compleatur numerus conservorum et fratrum eorum qui occidentur postea exempto eorum (Apoc. VI) - c 0 Apocalypsim vere divinam a tanto apostolo merito confessionis tempore patefactam, ut magis ad tolerantiam durarentur, cum illi passorum merita monstrarentur!
「我看見在神的祭壇底下,有為神的道、並為所持守的耶穌見證而被殺之人的靈魂;有白衣賜給他們各人;他們大聲呼喊說:聖潔真實的主啊,你不審判住在地上的人、給我們伸流血的冤,要到幾時呢?於是有白衣賜給他們各人,又有話對他們說,還要安息片時,等著那將來像他們一樣被殺的同伴弟兄的數目湊滿了」(默六章)。哦,真正屬神的默示錄,是由如此偉大的使徒在因作見證而被囚的時候展開的,好使他們在看見受苦者的功德時,更被堅固以致能忍耐!
'I saw under the altar of God the souls of the martyrs slain for the word of God and for the testimony of Jesus, which they held; and to them were given single robes; and they cried with a great voice, saying: How long, O Lord, holy and true, do you not avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth? And to them were given single white robes, and it was said to them, that they should rest yet a little time, until the number should be completed of their fellow-servants and of their brethren who are to be slain hereafter as they were' (Rev. 6). O Apocalypse truly divine, laid open by so great an apostle in the time of confession by merit, that they might the more be hardened unto endurance, when the merits of those who had suffered were shown to them!
284:106
Non ergo errandum est d per folia sibyllarum, quarum ut paginae incerlis mundi malis spiritibus luctahantur, ita loca ventis hujus aeris turbabantur. Ecce evidentissime apostolus hoc quod habebat enucleat, et obscurissimæ quæstioni lumen infert. Senserat haec aliquando dicenda, quae nunc sinistrior lingua, tanquam oleo, mollitis arte sermonibus in audientium et suum jaculatur interitum. Et propterea vidi, inquit, sub ara Dei animas occisorum martyrum. De fide testis nullus ambigit: testimonium ventiletur, intelligentia responsi nutet, non dicentis auctoritas. CAP. XIII. — Ac primum istud est animadvertendum, quod animas occisorum martyrum apostolus testatur se vidisse:
因此,人不可藉著西比拉的書葉走入歧途,那些書頁與世上飄忽不定的邪靈相搏,那些處所也被這空中的風攪擾。看哪,使徒極其明白地詳陳他所擁有的,並為那最隱晦的問題帶來光明。他早已察覺這些話有一天需要說出來,就是如今一條更陰險的舌頭,彷彿抹了油、用技巧軟化的言語所拋出、以致害了聽者和他自己的話。因此他說:「我看見在神的祭壇底下,有被殺之殉道者的靈魂。」論到見證人的可信,無人懷疑:讓那見證受篩驗,讓對答的理解有所游移,但不是說話者的權威。第十三章——首先當注意的是:使徒見證他看見的是被殺之殉道者的靈魂:
One must not, therefore, go astray through the leaves of the sibyls, whose pages struggled with the uncertain evil spirits of the world, and whose places were troubled by the winds of this air. Behold, most evidently the apostle sets forth in detail what he possessed, and brings light to the most obscure question. He had perceived that these things would need to be said at some time, which now a more sinister tongue, as if with oil, with words softened by art, hurls forth unto the destruction of his hearers and of himself. And therefore, 'I saw,' he says, 'under the altar of God the souls of the martyrs slain.' Concerning the faith of the witness, no one is in doubt: let the testimony be sifted, let the understanding of the response waver, not the authority of the one who speaks. CHAP. XIII.—And first this is to be noted, that the apostle testifies that he saw the souls of the martyrs slain:
284:107
ne quis, cum de muneribus disputare coeperimus, post resurrectionem dicat tribuenda martyribus, quae adhuc animas docentur indulta; presertim cum istud astipuletur nobis quod de mora judicii conqueruntur, quam resurrecturus utique, non qui jam resurrexit, accusat: quoniam aliud est poscere ut teneas, aliud jam tenere. Stolæ autem martyrum donantur exercitui, et tanquam tantae libertatis ingratus, magna Melum pulsat invidia de tarditate vindictæ: qui non levi pondere sermonis exprobrat dicendo: Quousque, Domine? hoc est dicere: quousque non vindicas quos statim vindicare debuisses? quousque, Domine? hoc est dicere: nunquid nos ultra finem differs sæculoruin?
免得有人在我們開始論述這些恩賜時,說這些要在復活之後才賜給殉道者——其實這些如今就已顯明是賜給了他們的靈魂;尤其這一點對我們有利:他們抱怨審判遲延——這審判無疑是一位將要復活的人所控訴的,而非一位已經復活的人:因為求得以持守是一回事,已然持守又是另一回事。然而,白衣是賜給這一大群的,他們彷彿對如此大的自由不知感恩,帶著極大的切望為報仇的遲緩而發出強烈的呼求:他以毫不輕率的言語責問說:「主啊,要到幾時呢?」意即:你不審判那你本當立刻審判的人,要到幾時呢?「主啊,要到幾時呢?」意即:你竟要把我們延擱到諸世代的終結以外嗎?
lest anyone, when we shall have begun to dispute concerning the gifts, should say that they are to be bestowed upon the martyrs after the resurrection, which are shown to have been granted to the souls even now; especially since this stipulates in our favour, that they complain of the delay of the judgment—a judgment which surely one about to rise again accuses, not one who has already risen: since it is one thing to ask that you may hold, another to hold already. But the robes of the martyrs are given to the host, and, as though ungrateful for such great liberty, envy strikes at Melum with great envy concerning the tardiness of vengeance: one who, with no light weight of speech, reproaches by saying: 'How long, O Lord?' that is to say: how long do you not avenge those whom you ought straightway to have avenged? 'How long, O Lord?' that is to say: do you defer us beyond the end of the ages?
284:108
Nam jam ad finem usque perventum est, et de nostra ultione non loqueris. Quod enim dicunt mirabiliter, subjungunt: non vindicas sanguinem nostrum ab his qui interris inhabitant ? Ergo non quousque, si adhuc illi mortales versantur in terris, qui Domini famulos fuste, lapide, ungula, flagris, plumbo, ferro, bestiis, igne sunt persecuti. Quousque enim imputatio est prolixioris aetatis, ut aut quousque sit sine line Sed adhuc persecutores morantur in carne, aut illi vita excesserunt, etiamsi in terris habitant, si quousque non fallit. Sed nihil falsum profertur testibus veritatis; et ideo magis interpretatio, non fides quaerenda est, quæ subobscura elocutione non excluditur, sed velatur.
因為已經來到那盡頭,而你竟不提為我們伸冤的事。他們奇妙地所說的,又加上一句:「你不給我們向住在地上的人伸流血的冤麼?」所以,若那些用棍棒、石頭、鐵爪、鞭子、鉛塊、鐵器、野獸、烈火逼迫主僕人的必死之人,仍逗留在地上,這就不是「要到幾時」的問題了。因為「要到幾時」乃是指向更綿長時代的歸咎——即這「要到幾時」是否要無窮無盡。然而,或是逼迫者仍逗留在肉身中,或是他們已離世——即或他們仍住在地上——只要這「要到幾時」不欺哄人。但真理的見證人絕不吐出虛謊之言;因此當尋求的乃是解釋,而非其可信性,這可信性並未被那隱晦的措辭排除,只是被遮蔽了。
For already it has been arrived at the very end, and of our vengeance you do not speak. For what they say wonderfully, they add: 'You do not avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?' Therefore it is not 'how long,' if those mortals are still lingering on the earth who persecuted the servants of the Lord with cudgel, stone, claw, scourge, lead, iron, beasts, fire. For 'how long' is the imputation of a more prolonged age—as to whether 'how long' is to be without end. But either the persecutors still tarry in the flesh, or they have departed from life, even if they dwell on the earth, provided 'how long' does not deceive. But nothing false is put forth by the witnesses of truth; and therefore an interpretation, not the faith, is rather to be sought, which by an obscure phrasing is not excluded, but veiled.
284:109
Cum ergo dicunt: quousque, Domine, sanctus et verus, non vindicas 144 sanguinem nostrum ab his qui in terris inhabitant, non eorum mortaliutu sanguinem mortesque desiderant qui in eos quondam aut populari seditione sævierunt, aut tribunalibus suffulti capilales sententias promulgarunt, quoniam in terris adhuc inhabitant, nec fas eSt ut accusentur defuncti, qui, dum viverent, sunt derensi his verbis; Ne statuas illis hoc peccatum; ignorant enim quid fa ciunt (Act. vu). Quod si inter passionum tormenta et amaros mortis labores tam pie quilibet pro injustis, pro impiis, pro cruentis, pro blasphemantibus supplicarunt;
所以,當他們說:「聖潔真實的主啊,你不給我們向住在地上的人伸流血的冤,要到幾時呢?」他們並非渴求那些人的必死之血與死亡——就是那些從前或在民眾暴動中向他們發烈怒、或倚仗公堂頒布死刑判決的人——因為這些人仍住在地上,且不當控告已死之人,他們活著時已被這些話所辯護:「不要將這罪歸於他們,因為他們所作的,他們不曉得」(宗七章)。但若在受難的酷刑與死亡的苦楚中,竟有人如此虔誠地為不義者、為不敬虔者、為嗜血者、為褻瀆者代求;
When, therefore, they say: 'How long, O Lord, holy and true, do you not avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth,' they do not desire the mortal blood and deaths of those who once either raged against them in popular sedition, or, propped up by tribunals, promulgated capital sentences—since these still dwell on the earth, and it is not right that the dead be accused, who, while they lived, were defended by these words: 'Lay not this sin to their charge; for they know not what they do' (Acts 7). But if amid the torments of their passions and the bitter labours of death anyone so piously supplicated for the unjust, for the impious, for the bloodthirsty, for the blaspheming;
284:110
si eo denique, tempore quo ipse angustiarum sensus extrema patientium poterat excitare ad maledictum, precatio pro hofnine fusa est, quis non intelligit non mentes martyhum, sed persecutorum personas fuisse notatas, eosque appeti quos in terris adhuc inhabitare credendum est illo tempore, quos quidem ignorantia non defendit, non eos qui in terris habitare jam per conditionem naturalis substantia desierunt, et olim ab ipsis martyribus sub ignoratione sunt excusati? Qui isti sunt non ignoramus. Spirituales sine dubio nequitiæ et tenebrarum potestas, quae et in terris adhuc inhabitant, et non cum ignorantia in Dei famulos peccaverunt. Nam cum ipsis Domino dixerint:
最終,若在苦痛之感本可激動那些在極度受苦中的人發咒詛的那時刻,卻有禱告為人傾流而出——誰能不明白:被標記出來的並非殉道者的心,而是逼迫者的位分,並且所尋求的乃是那些必須相信在那時仍住在地上、且確實不因無知而得辯護的人,而非那些因其本質的自然狀況早已停止住在地上、且早已被殉道者自己以無知為由所寬宥的人呢?這些是誰,我們並非不知。無疑就是那屬靈的邪惡與黑暗的權勢,他們既仍住在地上,又非以無知得罪神的僕人。因為當他們對主自己說:
if, finally, at that very time when the very sense of anguish could rouse those in extremity of suffering to a curse, a prayer was poured out for man—who does not understand that not the minds of the martyrs, but the persons of the persecutors were marked out, and that those are being sought whom it must be believed still dwell on the earth at that time, whom indeed ignorance does not defend, not those who through the condition of their natural substance have already ceased to dwell on the earth, and were long since excused by the martyrs themselves under ignorance? Who these are, we are not ignorant. Undoubtedly the spiritual wickednesses and the power of darkness, who both still dwell on the earth, and have not sinned against the servants of God with ignorance. For when they have said to the Lord Himself:
284:111
Quid venisti ante tempus torquere nos (Matth. VIII) ? Quomodo ejus famulos nescierunt, quos nec persecuti essent si ejus famulos ignorassent ? Ergo cum persecuti sunt, scierunt, quos per tormenta a Domino sUo detrahere conabantur. Ac inde cum beati martyres pro hominibus intercedunt, eosque ignorantiae excusatione defendunt, sequitur ut scientes teneantur in crimine, quique ipsas ignorantiæ tenebras hominibus suffuderunt, quorum furor etiam impietates excusat humanas: quos non alios dicere poterimus, quam qui etiam suis non amici sunt, dum eis non permittunt esse Quod bonum est: etiam Dei famuli inimici sunt, dum eos, quod bonum nesciunt, persequuntur. CAP.
「你來這裡,時候還沒有到,就要叫我們受苦麼?」(太八章)——他們既非不認得主的僕人(若他們不認得,就不會逼迫他們),怎能說不知道呢?所以,當他們逼迫僕人時,他們是知道自己正藉酷刑要把誰從其主身邊拖走。因此,當至福的殉道者為人代求,並以無知為由為人辯護時,隨之可見:那明知故犯的乃被算為有罪,就是那把無知的陰影傾注在人身上的,其暴怒甚至寬宥了人類的種種不敬虔:這些我們只能稱之為那連對自己人也不友善的——因他們不容自己人成為那美善的;他們也是神僕人的仇敵——因他們逼迫僕人,只因不知何為美善。第……章
'What have you come to torment us before the time?' (Matt. 8)—how did they not know His servants, whom they would not have persecuted if they had been ignorant of His servants? Therefore, when they persecuted them, they knew whom by torments they were trying to drag away from their Lord. And hence, when the blessed martyrs intercede for men, and defend them by the excuse of ignorance, it follows that those are held guilty who knowingly acted, and who poured out those very shadows of ignorance upon men, whose fury excuses even human impieties: whom we shall be able to call none other than those who are not friends even to their own, while they do not permit them to be that which is good: they are enemies even of the servants of God, while they persecute them because they do not know what is good. CHAP.
284:112
XIV.-Post harum sanctarum animarum querelam sequentia videamus: Et datæ sunt eis singulæ stolæ albæ. Quid hoc est, quod iterum vestiuntur? Nam prius, ut scriptum est, a Deo vestes sunt consecuti; a et nunc indumentis gemina libertate donantur. Quae utique vestimenta, cum spiritualia sint, non possumus vereri ne illa quae prius data sunt, extra videantar; nec sane querela generata est. Igitur, quoniam diversitas ipsorum et significatio vestium non sine mysterio est, Intelligere debemus donorum varietates et operationum divitias: quoniam subministrat unus atque idem spiritus. Accipiunt ergo vestes prius, ubi per confessionem corpora posuerunt: credo, ut vestiti non nudi invenirentur.
第十四章——在這些聖潔靈魂的抱怨之後,讓我們看接下來的話:「有白衣賜給他們各人。」這是怎麼回事,他們竟再度得穿衣?因為從前,如經上所記,他們已從神得了衣服;如今又蒙賜衣裳,得著雙重的自由。這些衣裳既是屬靈的,我們就不必擔心先前所賜的會在外面顯得被脫去;也確實沒有生出任何抱怨。因此,既然這些衣裳的多樣性與其象徵並非沒有奧祕,我們就當明白這是恩賜的種種與作為的豐盛:因為是同一位聖神供應它們。所以,他們先領受衣服,是在他們藉作見證捨去身體之處:我想,是為叫他們被發現時是穿了衣的,而非赤身的。
XIV.—After the complaint of these holy souls, let us see what follows: 'And to them were given single white robes.' What is this, that they are clothed again? For before, as it is written, they obtained garments from God; and now they are gifted with clothing by a twofold liberty. Which garments, since they are spiritual, we cannot fear that those which were first given should appear outwardly cast off; nor indeed has any complaint arisen. Therefore, since the diversity of these garments and their signification is not without mystery, we ought to understand the varieties of gifts and the riches of operations: since one and the same Spirit ministers them. They receive garments, then, first, where by confession they laid down their bodies: I believe, that they might be found clothed, not naked.
284:113
Rursus accipiunt alia vestimenta post interpellationem, imo post immutationem tam longæ patientiæ sustinentixque. Quæ utique cum accipiunt, quis non intelligit ut nova illos veste, ita virtute perfusos qua nunc emicant et apparent? Quod si aliud postulassent, aliud accepissent, ut dona respuerent, aut amplius quærerent irrisi. At cum non irridere illos Dei sit, quibus magna promisit, et hi post secundam munificentiam non querantur, dubitamusne ad consolationem querelarum ea speciem b pertinere, quæ vindictam postulantibus est donata ? At si ad consolationem, quæ major consolatio poterit inveniri hac potestate, quae dæmones, id est suos persequuntur inimicos?
他們又在申訴之後,甚而在如此漫長的忍耐與堅忍之轉變之後,領受了別的衣裳。他們既領受了這些,誰能不明白:正如以新袍,他們也被一種能力所充溢,如今憑此發光顯現?但假使他們求的是一樣、所得的卻是另一樣,以致他們會鄙棄這恩賜,或被戲弄而求得更多。然而,神絕不會戲弄祂所應許大事的人,而這些人在第二次的厚賜之後也不抱怨,那麼我們還懷疑麼——賜給那些求報仇者的那顯現,是屬於對他們抱怨的安慰的?但若是為安慰,還有什麼安慰能大過這能力呢——就是那逼迫眾鬼、即他們自己仇敵的能力?
Again they receive other garments after their appeal, nay, after the change of so long a patience and endurance. Which when they receive, who does not understand that, just as with a new robe, so with a virtue they are suffused, whereby now they shine forth and appear? But if they had asked for one thing and received another, so that they should spurn the gifts, or, mocked, should seek more. But since it is not God's to mock those to whom He has promised great things, and since these, after the second munificence, do not complain, do we doubt that to the consolation of their complaints there belongs that appearance which was given to those who were demanding vengeance? But if unto consolation, what greater consolation can be found than this power, which persecutes the demons, that is, their own enemies?
284:114
Nam si stolas istas ad speciem 145 nostrarum vestium conferamus, alias quoque aliquas, ne in his reponendis egeant, inquiramus. Sed hoc ridiculum est, quod statim occurrit, quia a vera et necessaria interpretatione discedit. De vindictæ mora generata est querela. In finem utique temporum, id est nostrorum; in nos enim fines saeculorum devenerunt, ut mora credatur, ad hanc diluendam, stolis animæ vestiuntur, nc omnino nudæ sine majori protectione putarentur. Alia enim ratio animarum est corpore exspoliatarum, alia hominum adhuc in carne viventium. Nobis ovium vellera, et operatio mulieris indumenta procurant, illis faciunt merita vestimentum.
因為,我們若把這些白衣比作我們衣服的樣式,那就當為他們再尋找別的一些衣物,免得他們在收起這些衣裳時反倒缺乏。但這是可笑的,一想即知,因為它偏離了那真確而必要的解釋。抱怨是為報仇的遲延而生。直到諸時代——即我們這時代——的末了(因為諸世代的末了已臨到我們),好叫這遲延被相信;為洗刷這遲延,眾靈魂被穿上白衣,免得他們被視為毫無更大保護、全然赤裸。因為脫離身體的靈魂所需的緣由是一回事,仍在肉身中活著之人所需的又是另一回事。對我們,是羊毛與婦女的手工供應衣裳;對他們,則是他們的功德造成衣袍。
For if we compare these robes to the appearance of our garments, let us also inquire after some others, lest in storing these away they should be in want. But this is ridiculous, which straightway occurs, because it departs from the true and necessary interpretation. Concerning the delay of vengeance a complaint arose. Unto the end of the times, that is, of ours—for upon us the ends of the ages have come—that the delay may be believed; to wash this away, the souls are clothed with robes, lest they be thought altogether naked without a greater protection. For the account of souls despoiled of the body is one thing, that of men still living in the flesh is another. For us the fleeces of sheep, and the work of woman, procure garments; for them their merits make the raiment.
284:115
Cum ergo post querelam martyrum anim;e stolis amiciuntur, divina protectione donantur, qua se supervestiri etiam ille vas electionis optabat; quam vestem Adam cum amisisset, etiam in paradiso. nudus inventus est. Denique indicat operatio quid stolas intelligere debeamus. Si postulasse vindictam martyres credimus, ergo ad consolationem credimus interim aliquid accepisse. Si propter stolas, velut quasdam vestium largitiones, querela sedata: cui non hæc et prima dona meruerunt?
所以,當在殉道者的抱怨之後,眾靈魂被裹上白衣,他們便蒙賜神的保護,就是那揀選的器皿也渴望被披上的;亞當失去這衣袍時,連在樂園中也被發現是赤身的。總之,這作為指明我們當以白衣理解為何物。我們若相信殉道者求了報仇,就相信他們暫且領受了某物以得安慰。若是為著白衣、彷彿某種衣裳的賞賜而止息了抱怨:那麼這頭一份恩賜,又是為誰而配得的呢?
When, therefore, after the complaint of the martyrs, the souls are wrapped in robes, they are gifted with a divine protection, with which that vessel of election too desired to be over-clothed; which garment when Adam had lost, he was found naked even in paradise. In fine, the operation indicates what we ought to understand by the robes. If we believe the martyrs asked for vengeance, then we believe that for the meanwhile they received something unto consolation. If, on account of the robes, as though certain largesses of garments, the complaint was quieted: for whom did not these first gifts too merit?
284:116
Sed quoniam, ut dixi, virtutum varietates, quibus divinitus præclaræ animæ muniuntur, in stolis sunt designatæ, ideo post secundam munificentiam juxta postulationis formam in eos persecutores qui in terris inhabitant, quid consecuti videantur ostendant, quid adhuc etiam habituri erunt: dum pari persecutione conservos eorum, donec prædestinatus testium numerus impleatur, occident. Hic et istud non otiose est accipiendum, quod inter duo persecutionum tempora, hæc martyrum vox praecessit, ut designet illos blasphemare qui eos nostro tempore novi aliquid consecutos fuisse mirantur. Nam et cum fuisse crudeles persecutiones videamus, et venturas credamus:
然而,如我所說,眾傑出靈魂所蒙神堅固的種種德能,既在白衣中被標示出來,那麼在第二次厚賜之後,就照他們祈求的形式,讓他們顯明:他們似乎已從那住在地上的逼迫者身上得著什麼,並且此後還要得著什麼——同時他們的同伴要照樣被逼迫殺害,直到預定的見證人之數湊滿。這裡也有一點不可等閒領受:殉道者這聲音是在兩次逼迫之間先發出的,藉此標明——那些驚訝於他們在我們這時代得著某種新事的人,正是在褻瀆。因為我們既看見過往的逼迫是殘酷的,又相信將來還有逼迫:
But since, as I have said, the varieties of virtues, with which the illustrious souls are divinely fortified, are designated in the robes, therefore after the second munificence, according to the form of their petition, let them show what they seem to have obtained against those persecutors who dwell on the earth, and what they shall yet have hereafter: while by an equal persecution they slay their fellow-servants, until the foreordained number of witnesses is filled. Here too this is not to be received idly, that between the two times of persecutions this voice of the martyrs went before, so as to designate that those blaspheme who marvel that they have in our time obtained something new. For while we see that persecutions were cruel, and believe that they are to come:
284:117
medium ergo istud tempus quo martyres qui praecesserunt remunerantur, hoc nostrum est. Et ideo nunc operantur, non de merito, quod semper habuerant, sed de virtute, quam nuper adepti sunt. CAP. XV. — Forsitan moveat aliquem quid sit quod exspectare jubeantur, si jam ad maturitatem pœnæ judicium dæmonibus illatura virtus erupit, resurrectionem ut sustineant admonentur. Cæterum haec illis gloria et in David carminibus fuerat promissa his verbis: Lætabuntur in cubilibus suis (Psal. CXLIX). Dum sepultt sunt, utique lætabuntur. Cubilia posuit pro sepulcris, de quibus et resurrecturi sunt, cum voce archangeli et tuba Dei fuerint excitati (1 Thessal. rv). Cubilia ergo vere dicuntur.
所以,這中間的時候——就是那先前殉道者得酬報的時候——正是我們這時代。因此,他們如今行事,並非出於他們素來所有的功德,而是出於他們新近所得的能力。第十五章——或許有人會困惑:他們既被吩咐要等候,若那將要對眾鬼施行審判、以致其刑罰成熟的能力如今已迸發出來,他們為何還被勸諭去等候復活呢?但這榮耀在達味的詩歌中也早已應許給他們,用這些話:「他們在自己的床榻上歡欣」(詩一四九篇)。當他們被埋葬時,他們必歡欣。他用「床榻」代指「墳墓」,他們也要從其中復活,那時他們要被總領天使的聲音和神的號筒喚醒(帖前四章)。所以,它們真被稱為「床榻」,
this middle time, therefore, in which the martyrs who went before are recompensed, is this time of ours. And therefore now they work, not out of the merit which they had always had, but out of the virtue which they have lately obtained. CHAP. XV.—Perhaps it may move someone, what it is that they are bidden to wait, if now the virtue about to bring judgment upon the demons has burst forth unto the maturity of their punishment—they are admonished to await the resurrection. But this glory had been promised to them also in the songs of David, in these words: 'They shall rejoice in their beds' (Ps. 149). While they are buried, surely, they shall rejoice. He put 'beds' for 'sepulchres,' from which they are also to rise again, when they shall have been roused by the voice of the archangel and the trumpet of God (1 Thess. 4). 'Beds,' therefore, they are truly called,
284:118
in quibus nunc quiescunt. Etsi lætabuntur in cubiculis suis, prius hoc futurum erat, nempe cum surgerent de sepulcris. Quod adeo impletum est, ut iri cubilibus suis illos sine dubitatione gaudere videamus. Nam quæ alia talis gratulatio animas illorum poterit intrare, quam cum ante ipsa cubilia, id est, ut diximus, sepulcra sanctorum, ibi eos inimici sui, quos se quondam occidisse credebant nunc et vivere et ulcisci se non sine tormentorum acerbitate profitentur t Hoc Illis stolæ Istæ quas iteravit specialis largitio contulerunt, per eas et qui non nominabantur implorantur, et qui nesciebantur celebrantur, et qui non videbantur apparent. Has stolas, ut Icerimus.
他們如今就在其中安息。他們雖要在自己的床榻上歡欣,這事本要在將來成就,就是當他們從墳墓中復活的時候。這事如今已在如此程度上應驗,以致我們毫無疑問地看見他們在自己的床榻上歡欣。因為還有什麼別的這樣的喜樂能進入他們的靈魂呢?豈不正是當在那些床榻之前——即如我們所說,聖徒的墳墓之前——他們自己的仇敵,就是他們從前以為已被殺害的,如今卻承認他們既活著又報復自己,且不無酷刑之苦?這正是這些白衣——由特別的賞賜所重賜的——所賦予他們的;藉這些白衣,那些未被題名的得蒙祈求,那些不為人知的得被頌揚,那些不曾被看見的得以顯現。這些白衣,就此讓我們作個結束吧。
in which they now rest. Although they shall rejoice in their beds, this was first to be in the future, namely when they should rise from their sepulchres. Which is so far fulfilled, that we see them without doubt rejoice in their beds. For what other such gratulation could enter their souls, than when before those very beds—that is, as we have said, the sepulchres of the saints—their own enemies, whom they once believed they had slain, now profess that they both live and avenge themselves, and that not without the bitterness of torments? This is what these robes—which a special largesse repeated—conferred upon them; through them both those who were not named are implored, and those who were not known are celebrated, and those who were not seen appear. These robes, that we may make an end.
284:119
hucusQue non hnbuerunt, sed nunc habere coeperunt. In hac forma mulier illa in Salomone laudatur, quae duplices vestes facit viro suo: unam in patientia passionis, alteram in virtute vindictæ. Sic nobis legere sanctumatque pium est: alias nec loqui debemus, ne vel 146 infidelitas nostra, vel ignorantia in tenebras gentilitatis blasphema disputatione descendat: cuni prophetia ex eo praecesserit, ut venturis lumen inferret. Nuuc superest ut credenda sint divinitus fieri quae probavimus et promissa, nec tantum promissa quantum et postulata.
直到如今他們並未擁有這些,但現今卻已開始擁有了。在此形象之下,所羅門書中那位婦人受到稱讚,她為丈夫做雙層的衣裳:一件是受苦的忍耐,另一件是伸冤的能力。因此我們如此誦讀乃是聖潔而虔敬的;不然我們甚至不該開口,免得我們的不信或無知藉著褻瀆的辯論墮入外邦黑暗之中,因為預言之所以先行,正是為要將光帶給那將要來的事。如今所餘下的,就是我們當相信我們所證明的那些事乃是藉神能而成——這些事既被預言,且不只是被預言,也是被祈求而得的。
Until now they did not have these things, but now they have begun to have them. Under this figure that woman is praised in Solomon who makes double garments for her husband: one in the patience of suffering, the other in the strength of vindication. Thus it is holy and pious for us to read; otherwise we ought not even to speak, lest either our unbelief or our ignorance sink down into the darkness of heathenism through blasphemous disputation, since prophecy went before precisely for this end, that it might bring light to the things that were to come. Now it remains that we believe those things to have been done by divine power which we have proved to be both foretold, and not so much foretold as also asked for.
284:120
Quod si et postulata sunt, et non aliis quam poscentibus attributa, quid mirum est si aut quod postulaverant, aut quod gaudent, se ante accepisse, non occultant? Exigunt pœnas ab his qui inhabitant in terris: quos accusatio comprehendit hos virtus impugnat. Ipsi enim inhabitant in terris, qui possident mentes hominum terrena possidentium: quos cum martyres ad supplicia dcposcunt, etiam pro his quos possederant deprecantur. Denique et ipsa desiderabilia sua sic agunt, ut eos a terrena habitatione, id est ab obsessis terrenis hominibus excludant. An calumniantur, cur dæmones torqueantur, et favemus inimicis ?
但若這些事既被祈求,且只賜給那些祈求的人,那麼,倘若他們不隱瞞自己已先得著所祈求的或所歡喜的,這又有何可奇怪呢?他們向住在地上的人施行懲罰:控告所抓住的人,正是他們的能力所攻擊的對象。因為那些佔據著擁有屬地之物之人心思的,正是住在地上的;當殉道者要求把這些交付刑罰時,他們甚至為自己曾佔據之人代求。最後,他們如此對待自己所貪戀之物,竟將它們逐出屬地的居所,就是逐出他們所盤據的屬地之人。難道他們埋怨為何鬼魔受折磨,而我們卻偏袒仇敵嗎?
But if these things were also asked for, and granted to none other than those who asked, what wonder is it if they do not conceal that they received beforehand either what they had prayed for or what they rejoice in? They exact punishments from those who dwell upon the earth: those whom accusation seizes, these does their power assail. For they themselves dwell upon the earth who possess the minds of men that possess earthly things; and when the martyrs demand these for torment, they intercede even on behalf of those whom they had possessed. Finally, they so deal with their very objects of desire as to shut them out from their earthly dwelling, that is, from the earthly men they had beset. Or do they complain that demons are tormented, and do we favour our enemies?
284:121
Martyres contra ipsos invidiosa pene indignatione insurgunt, ct sustineri illos tanto saeculorum spatio conqueruntur: d et nos iingimus nos mirariquid istud sit, quasi non debeant vel nostro tempore solvere quod ab Adam merentur. Quod autem istud miraculum Mediolaui videtur primum exortum, vel bono Ambrosio concessum, quis non videt fidem nostram propter Arianorum perfidiam divinis testimoniis approbatam?
殉道者以近乎嫉恨的義憤起來攻擊他們,並埋怨這些惡者竟被容忍了如此漫長的世代之久;而我們也假裝驚訝這是何事,彷彿他們不該——即使在我們這時代——償還自亞當以來所當受的。但這神蹟為何似乎首先出現於米蘭,或賜給善良的安波羅修——誰看不出我們的信仰藉此被神的見證所印證,以對抗亞流派的悖謬呢?
The martyrs rise up against them with an almost jealous indignation, and lament that these are endured for so vast a stretch of ages; and we too feign to marvel what this may be, as though they ought not, even in our own time, to pay what they deserve from Adam onward. But that this miracle should seem first to have arisen at Milan, or to have been granted to the good Ambrose—who does not see that our faith was thereby confirmed by divine testimonies against the perfidy of the Arians?
284:122
Namque cum in Italia catholica fides intolerabilem tyrannidem sub Auxentio sustinuisset, tandem donante Domino libertatem veterem, etsi jam eo tempore quo prædicto Ambrosius substitutus est, respiravit huic tamen ipsi in adversariorum confusionem, et nostram spem scilicet, omnis coelestium gloria, omnes etiam martyres consensere, qui cum jam pridem apparendi haberent tempus, hominem cui se proderent inquirebant. Illum certe cui sub ea fide revelarentur quae marlyria fecissent. Sic donatum est Ambrosio qUOd Auxenuo denegatum est: quoniam quæ Auxentius blasphemabat, Ambrosius prædicabat. Sed cum haec virtus martyrum per omnes provincias sit itura e (omnibus enim non Am.
因為當義大利的大公信仰在奧森修統治下忍受了難以承受的暴政,末後主賜回昔日的自由——雖然在那按預言安波羅修被立為主教之時,信仰早已重獲喘息——然而正是為著這位聖人,為使其仇敵蒙羞,也就是為著我們的盼望,眾天上者的一切榮耀,並眾殉道者,都一同應允;因為他們雖早已有了顯現的時機,卻仍在尋找一個可向其顯明自己的人——就是那位在使他們成為殉道者的信仰之下他們可向其顯露的人。於是賜給安波羅修的,正是被拒於奧森修的,因為奧森修所褻瀆的,安波羅修卻宣揚。但既然殉道者的這能力要傳遍各行省(因為它是給眾人,而不只給安……
For when in Italy the catholic faith had endured intolerable tyranny under Auxentius, at last, the Lord granting the old liberty—even though already at that time when, as foretold, Ambrose was set in his place, it drew breath again—yet to this very man, for the confounding of his adversaries and, namely, for our hope, all the glory of the heavenly ones, and all the martyrs likewise, gave their consent; for although they had long since had a time of appearing, they were seeking a man to whom they might reveal themselves—him assuredly to whom they might be disclosed under that faith which had made them martyrs. Thus it was granted to Ambrose what was denied to Auxentius, since the very things that Auxentius blasphemed, Ambrose proclaimed. But since this power of the martyrs was to pass through all the provinces (for it is to all, not to Am-…
284:123
brosio soli sine personarum acceptione donanda est, necessario tamen primum in Italia processit, cui infidelitas Ariana fuerit dominata. Quoniam signa non fidelibus, sed infidelibus donata sunt (I Cor. xiv). Nam a Domino qui signum postulant infideles sunt: scribæ postulant, Pharisaei postulant; apostoli tacent, et credunt, et sequuntur. Et propterea non mirandum quod diyina virtus operatur per sepulcra sanctorum, quod nec suis temediis potuit hæretica mens curari, ut vel tandem episcopum eam sequeretur, cui communicare etiam martyres ipsa revelatione suarum virtutum dignatione vidissent. CAP. XVI.
……單單賜給安波羅修,乃是不偏待人地賜下),然而它必然首先在義大利彰顯出來,因亞流派的不信曾在那裡掌權。因為神蹟不是給信的人,乃是給不信的人(林前十四章)。因為向主求神蹟的人是不信的:文士求,法利賽人求;使徒卻靜默,並且相信,並且跟從。所以,神的大能藉著聖徒的墳墓運行,這並不足為奇,因為那異端的心思連自己的醫治之法也不能將它治好,好叫它至終跟隨那位主教——就是連殉道者自己也藉著顯明其能力,樂意與之相通的那位。第十六章。
…brose alone that it must be given, without respect of persons), nevertheless it necessarily went forth first in Italy, over which Arian unbelief had held sway. For signs are given not to believers but to unbelievers (1 Cor. 14). For those who demand a sign from the Lord are unbelievers: the scribes demand, the Pharisees demand; the apostles are silent, and believe, and follow. And therefore it is not to be wondered at that the divine power works through the tombs of the saints, since the heretical mind could not be cured even by its own remedies, that it might at length follow the bishop with whom the martyrs themselves, by the very revelation of their powers, had deigned to be in communion. CHAP. XVI.
284:124
Nunc ad meditationem perfecti bominis redeamus, ex qua cumulus iste priusquam mensura illius expleretur excrevit, a Ecce hæc disputatio est ipsarum meditationum de quibus David dicit: Quoniam beatus qui in lege Domini meditabitur die ac nocte (Psal. I). Et sane difficile est silvam legis ingresso singularam quaestionum materiam segregare, cum altera alteram veluti ramulis quibusdam ita soeietate præceptionis attingat, ut sine alterius inchoatione cæpta uon valeat explicare. Ecce haec ipsa hominem illum nostrum nosse quam pulchrum est solum in talibus non stupere, cum reliquis solum quasi quibusdam fortuitis non movet, distinguere operationum species.
——如今讓我們回到那完全之人的默想,這一堆言論正是在其分量未滿之前,從此默想中生長出來的。看哪,這番辯論正屬於大衛所說的那些默想:唯有晝夜思想耶和華律法的人便為有福(詩篇一篇)。而對於一個進入律法叢林的人來說,實在難以將各別問題的材料一一分開,因為在教訓的相連之中,此一題目彷彿藉著某些小枝般地觸及彼一題目,以致所開始的若不藉另一題目的開端便無法展開。看哪,認識我們這位人物是何等美好:不僅在這樣的事上不驚愕,當別的事如同某些偶發之事臨到也不能動搖他,並且能分辨各種運作的種類。
—Now let us return to the meditation of the perfect man, out of which this heap grew before its measure was filled up. Behold, this disputation is of those very meditations of which David says: For blessed is he who shall meditate in the law of the Lord day and night (Ps. 1). And truly it is difficult for one who has entered the forest of the law to separate out the material of individual questions, since one so touches another—by certain little branches, as it were—in the fellowship of instruction, that what is begun cannot be unfolded without the beginning of another. Behold, how beautiful it is to know this man of ours: not only not to be astounded at such things, when other matters, as though certain chance occurrences, do not move him, but to distinguish the kinds of operations.
284:125
Et quia et ipsi dæmones operantur, intelligere naturas, quæ 147 vera sunt, quæ falsa, quæ novisse, est, non decipi, non errare-, non inimico assignare quae Dei sunt, nec Deo adjudicare quæ sunt dæmonum, scire tempora, signa cognoscere, habere Domini cognitam voluntatem: et alia Dei mirabilia cum gratiarum actione venerari, alia cum digna exsecratione vitare. Talem virum etiam saeculi homines laudavere, dicente Virgilio Felix qui potuit reram cogooscere causas. Bona sententia, si ad eam suo itinere venisset, ut appareat illum ignorasse b quod laudat: primis omissis, quæ sunt secunda celebravit. Nam et ordinc praepostero etiam sapientis vertit officium:
又因為鬼魔自己也運行作為,故他能明白諸事之本性——何為真,何為假;認識乃是不受欺騙、不致錯謬、不將屬神之事歸給仇敵、也不將屬鬼魔之事斷為屬神;能知曉時候,辨認徵兆,蒙主的旨意向他顯明;並以感恩敬奉神某些奇事,又以當有的憎惡躲避另一些。這樣的人連屬世的人也曾稱讚,維吉爾說道:能認識萬物之因的人有福了。這是美好的話,倘若他是循自己的道路而來,好叫人看出他實在不明白自己所稱讚的:他略去了首要之事,卻慶賀次要之事。因為他以顛倒的次序,甚至扭曲了智者的本分:
And because the demons themselves also work, it is his to understand the natures of things—which are true, which false; to have known is not to be deceived, not to err, not to assign to the enemy what is God's, nor to adjudge to God what is the demons'; to know the times, to recognize the signs, to have the will of the Lord made known to him; and to venerate some of God's marvels with thanksgiving, and to shun others with fitting execration. Such a man even men of the world have praised, Virgil saying: Happy is he who could know the causes of things. A fine sentiment, if he had come to it by his own path, so that it might appear he was ignorant of what he praises: having omitted the first things, he celebrated the second. For by a preposterous order he even overturned the office of the wise man:
284:126
dum non rerum causæ, sed rerum Creator inquirendus est, per quem ad causas rerum, si ipsum didicerimus, intrabimus. Cæterum illo omisso, causas rerum qualiter cognitas habere poterimus; cum qui prius hæc fecerit, deinde quare fecerit sit inquirendum ? Verum reperto rerum auctore, rerum quoque inveniemus et causas. Quod iste usque adeo non vidit, ut principalem locum hunc, qui rerum causas potuisset agoscere prædicaret, secundum quod subjungit, qui deos tanquam minus opus exsequens adorasset, ut quiquis agnoscat eos creatores rerum non fuisse, a quibus cognitio rerum quasi aliena distinguitur, nec coli oportere, si haec quæ laudantur, ut prima, præstare non possunt.
因為當尋求的不是萬物之因,乃是萬物之創造主——藉著祂,我們若認識了祂,便得以進入萬物之因。但若略去了祂,我們怎能得知萬物之因呢?當那位先造這些事、又為何造它們的主必須被尋求之時。然而,尋見了萬物的創造者,我們也必尋見萬物之因。這事那人竟如此看不透,以致在他宣稱那能認識萬物之因者居首位的同一段中,從他所補充的話——因他曾敬拜諸神,彷彿它們在做次要之工——他讓任何人都看出它們並非萬物的創造者,因萬物的知識與它們有別、彷彿是外來之物;它們也不當受敬拜,倘若它們不能提供這些被稱為首要的事物。
since it is not the causes of things, but the Creator of things, who must be sought—through whom, if we have learned Him, we shall enter into the causes of things. But with Him omitted, how shall we be able to have the causes of things known to us, when He who first made these things, and then to what end He made them, must be sought out? But when the Author of things is found, we shall find also the causes of things. This the man saw so little that, in the very passage where he proclaimed him who could recognize the causes of things to hold the principal place, in what he adds—since he had adored the gods as though performing a lesser work—he lets anyone recognize that they were not the creators of things, from whom the knowledge of things is distinguished as, so to speak, alien; nor ought they to be worshipped, if they cannot furnish these things which are praised as the first.
284:127
Nesciunt autem ea, quorum opifices non fuerunt. Denique et inventione illorum c diis suis detraota, humano eam assignant ingenio, illis scilicet qui sapientia excellunt, quod idola non colunt: ut jam diis eorum homo sit potentior, si ad haec quæ dii ipsorum ignorant, altiori cogitatione pervenerit. Ab his autem deos præcepit coli, qui plene prae stultitia rerum causas non queant invenire, quorumque præcordia, ut ipsius verbis utar, frigidus sanguis includit. Adhuc homo noster et Deum colere, principalem scit esse sapientiam, et rerum causas a compertas habet, non quaerit ex Syracusia ratione saeculi sapientis eminerer; sed ito docente quem colit, quem ante inquisivit quam rerum causas:
但它們並不認識那些不是它們所造之物。最後,人們甚至將這些事物的發明從其諸神那裡奪去,歸於人的才智——就是歸於那些以智慧超群、不拜偶像的人——以致如今人竟比他們的神更有能力,倘若人藉更高的思索達到了他們的神所不知之事。而他卻吩咐人去敬拜那些因愚昧滿盈、不能查出萬物之因、其胸中(借用他自己的話)被冷血封閉的神明。然而我們這位人物既知道敬拜神乃是首要的智慧,又已查明萬物之因;他不求以屬世智者那敘拉古式的推理來出人頭地,乃求靠他所敬拜、在查究萬物之因以先便已尋求的那一位之教導:
But they do not know those things of which they were not the makers. Finally, having stripped even the invention of those things from their gods, they assign it to human genius—namely, to those who excel in wisdom, in that they do not worship idols—so that now man is more powerful than their gods, if by loftier reflection he has arrived at these things which their gods are ignorant of. And he has enjoined that gods be worshipped by those who, being full of folly, cannot find out the causes of things, and whose breast, to use his very words, cold blood shuts in. Yet still our man both knows that to worship God is the principal wisdom, and has the causes of things ascertained; he does not seek to excel by the Syracusan reasoning of a worldling sage, but by the teaching of Him whom he worships, whom he sought out before the causes of things:
284:128
quoniam res ipsas rerum Conditor antecedit, qui illum monuit qux quibus essent ventura temporibus, cujus dispositionem sine ipso qui disposuit nullus agnovit: quoniam nemo scit quae Dei sunt, nisi Spiritus Dei. Nos vero, ut Apostolus ait: non spiritum hujus mundi accepimus, sed Spiritum qui ex Deo eat (1 Cor. 11); et ideo, quæ ipsius sunt, a non edocti humanae sapientiae verbis, sed Spiritu Dei et ejus superfusa nobis dignatione callemus. Haec est illa stultitia sæcularium; hæc sapientia vocatorum, cogitare semper in eorde: Quid retribuam Domino pro omnibus quæ retribuit mihi ( Psal. CXVI) ? Ipsum habere semper in ore, quoniam verbum est; esurire eum, quoniam panis est.
因為萬物的創造者先於萬物本身——祂告誡了他,在何等時候何事將要臨到,祂的安排除了那安排之者,無人知曉,因為除了神的靈,也沒有人知道神的事。但我們,正如使徒所說,並沒有領受這世界的靈,乃是領受那從神而來的靈(林前二章);因此凡屬祂的事,我們都通曉,不是憑人智慧的言語受教,乃是憑神的靈並祂澆灌在我們身上的恩慈。這就是屬世人所謂的愚拙;這就是蒙召者的智慧:常在心中思想,我拿什麼報答耶和華向我所賜的一切厚恩呢?(詩篇一百一十六篇);常將祂放在口中,因祂是道;渴慕祂,因祂是糧。
since the Founder of things goes before the things themselves—He who admonished him at what times what things were to come, whose disposition no one knew apart from Him who disposed it, since no one knows the things of God save the Spirit of God. But we, as the Apostle says, have not received the spirit of this world, but the Spirit that is of God (1 Cor. 2); and therefore we are skilled in the things that are His, taught not by the words of human wisdom, but by the Spirit of God and by His bounty poured out upon us. This is that folly of worldly men; this is the wisdom of the called: to consider always in the heart, What shall I render to the Lord for all the things that He hath rendered to me? (Ps. 116). To have Him always in the mouth, since He is the Word; to hunger after Him, since He is the Bread.
284:129
Ipsius Spiritu etiam ebrios mente excedere, quia calix est Novi Testamenti, et vinum de vinea quain de Ægypto ante transtulerat, quae vinea populus Israel Aut: quorum patres, ex quibus Dominus Jesus Christus secundum carnem processit. Illum loqui omni tempore, quoniam linguas nobis novas Spiritus ejus advexit. Quæ sunt autem istae linguæ novae, nisi istae: in saeculo esse, et sermonem de saeculo non habere; aliis Unguis loqui populo quam loqui populus secum ipse consuevit? Praeterea et istud est loqui aliis linguis Deum confiteri unum ab eo qui plures deos solitus erat confiteri, et ipsum in nostra fide novis linguis unum loqui et profiteri, et credere 148 Trinitatem.
藉著祂的靈,甚至如醉酒般心思超然於外,因為這是新約的杯,是從祂先前領出埃及的葡萄樹所產的酒——那葡萄樹就是以色列百姓,或說他們的列祖,主耶穌基督按肉體乃從他們而出。要時時傳講祂,因為祂的靈已將新的方言帶給我們。這些新方言究竟是什麼,豈不就是這些:身在世上,卻不談論屬世之事;用百姓向來彼此慣用之外的方言向百姓說話?此外,這也是說別的方言:向一位素來承認多神之人承認獨一的神;並在我們的信仰中,以新方言傳講並宣認祂為一,且相信三位一體。
By His Spirit even to go out of the mind as though drunk, since it is the cup of the New Testament, and wine from the vine which He had before brought over out of Egypt—which vine is the people Israel, or their fathers, from whom the Lord Jesus Christ proceeded according to the flesh. To speak of Him at all times, since His Spirit has conveyed new tongues to us. But what are these new tongues, if not these: to be in the world, and to hold no discourse about the world; to speak to the people in other tongues than the people has been wont to speak among itself? Moreover, this too is to speak in other tongues: to confess God as one, from one who was accustomed to confess many gods; and in our faith to speak and profess Him as one in new tongues, and to believe the Trinity.
284:130
Illum quoque amare, quia interpellat pro nobis; metuere, quia Pater omne judicium dedit Filio, illum momentis omnibus adorare, ab illo petere necessaria nobis et ipsi placita, qui peti per se vult, adeo ut poscenti verba haec demonstret, qui, quod est novum inter nos, solus petentes se amat. f Qui etiam solum, quod mirabile est, irascnur, nisi petatur. Infidelitas enim est nihil præsumpsisse de Deo. Nihil illum credit posse, qui quod judicat posse non poscit.
也要愛祂,因祂為我們代求;要敬畏祂,因父已將審判的事全交與子;要時刻敬拜祂;向祂祈求我們所需並祂所喜悅之事——祂願意人藉著祂自己向祂祈求,甚至將祈求的言語指示給求告的人;祂——這在我們中間是新奇的——單單愛那些向祂祈求的人。祂也是那位——這是奇妙的——唯有在不被祈求時才發怒。因為對神一無所求乃是不信。不祈求他所判定神能行之事的人,其實是不信神能行任何事。
To love Him also, because He intercedes for us; to fear Him, because the Father hath given all judgment to the Son; to adore Him at every moment; to ask of Him the things needful for us and pleasing to Himself—He who wills to be asked through Himself, so far that He shows the very words to the one asking; He who, and this is new among us, alone loves those who ask Him. He also who, and this is marvellous, is angry only if He be not asked. For it is unbelief to have presumed nothing of God. He believes Him able to do nothing, who does not ask for what he judges Him able to do.
284:131
Haec est illa, fili dilectissime, angusta via, hoc illud acus foramen per quod non introeunt sarcinati, aut animalia ponderibus attributa, Quoniam angusti et pusilli aditus, 8 non solum informia haec cum oneribus jumenta non capiunt, verum etiam ipsum nostrorum oculorum, si multimodis distrahatur, frustrantur obtutum. Unde et Dominus per prophetam ait: Vacate et videte (Psal. XLVI); et quando erit, ut possit intrari, quod per occupationes saeculi necdum cœptum cst invenirI. CAP. XVII. — Implevimus divisionibus suis propo. sitas quaestiones, exteriorem hominem interioremque monstrando, cum vitam, quae sit sancta, et in quo actu posita, quo studio tenealur, qua substantia ve.
至愛的兒子啊,這就是那窄路;這就是那針的孔,負重的人和被派了重擔的牲畜都不得進入。因為那入口既窄且小,它不但不容這些笨拙背負重擔的牲畜進入,甚至若我們眼目的注視被多方分散,也連這注視都必落空。故此主也藉先知說:你們要休息,要知道(詩篇四十六篇);那藉著世務尚未開始被尋見之事,人幾時才得以進入呢?第十七章。——我們已將所提出的問題連同其細分一一補足,藉著顯明外在的人與內在的人,說明何為聖潔的生活、它安置於何等作為之中、由何等熱忱所持守、由何等本質所……
This is that, most beloved son, the narrow way; this is that eye of the needle through which the laden do not enter, nor beasts assigned their burdens. Since the entrance is narrow and tiny, it not only does not admit these shapeless beasts of burden with their loads, but even frustrates the very gaze of our eyes, if it be distracted in manifold ways. Whence the Lord too says through the prophet: Be still and see (Ps. 46); and when will it be that one can enter into what, through the occupations of the world, has not even begun to be found? CHAP. XVII.—We have filled up the questions proposed with their divisions, by showing forth the outer man and the inner, when we showed what the holy life is, and in what act it is set, by what zeal it is held, by what substance it is…
284:132
getetur ostendimus, totumque cursum eius breviter, licet saltibus potius, si dici potest, quam passibus pro festinatione ad finem usque perduximus. NUM quare non ab hominibus etiam istius mundi videatur, accipe rationem, quandoquidem te mea verbositas delectat, quam negligentius judicas. dum attendis studiosius ad divina, Cum ille qui primus nobis mortis semen invexet, mundum istum, id est passionem hominis, victo sibi homine subjugasset, regnumque illius ipso rege jam capto, sub pedibus suis et ditione cepisset, eaque omnia quae in mundo sunt, velut suis peculiis et victoriæ suæ manubiis uteretur:
……得以維繫,我們都已展明;並且它的全部歷程,我們已簡略地——雖然由於匆忙,若可這樣說,是以躍進而非以步履——一直帶到終點。但它為何連這世上的人也不看重,請聽緣由,既然我的絮叨使你歡喜,而你在殷勤留意神聖之事時卻太過輕忽地評斷它。當那首先將死亡的種子帶進我們裡面的,把這世界——就是人的受苦——制伏於己,人既被勝過,又擄了那世界的君王,將那已被擒的王置於自己的腳下與權下,並把世上一切之物當作自己的私產和勝利的擄物來使用:
…sustained, we have shown; and its whole course, briefly—though rather by leaps, if it may be so said, than by steps, on account of our haste—we have carried through even to the end. But why it may not be esteemed even by the men of this world, receive the reason, since my verbosity delights you, which you judge too negligently while you attend more zealously to divine things. When he who first brought into us the seed of death had subjugated this world—that is, the suffering of man—to himself, man being overcome, and had taken the kingdom of that world, its king already captured, under his own feet and dominion, and was using all the things that are in the world as though they were his own private possessions and the spoils of his victory:
284:133
ne quando homo amissam sapientiam, an debitum Sibi vitæ quæreret testamentum, sic cunctis succis suæ artis infecit, ut et stultitiam sapientiæ colore vestiret, et mortem mentitae vitae leneciniis obumbraret, ut mala non fugerent, qui non cernerent opposita meliora. Denique ex illo tempore sic passim humanum genus graditur, stultitia pro sapientia habetur, dicente Psalmista: Quoniam laudatur peccator in desideriis animæ suæ, et iniMus benedicitur (Psal. x, Tunc vita putaturesse quæ mors est, et sub specie boni mala decipiunt, cum ad intelligentiae fraudem, dolo bonorum omnium virtus operitur. Nam divitia non secuturae post hominis mortem amantur.
為要免得人幾時去尋回失去的智慧,或尋回那本欠給他的生命之約,他便用其詭計的一切汁液污染萬物,使他既將愚拙披上智慧的色彩,又用假冒生命的媚惑遮蔽死亡,好叫人不逃避諸惡,因他們看不見與之相對的更美之事。末後,從那時起,人類便到處如此行;愚拙被當作智慧,正如詩人所說:惡人以心願自誇,貪財的背棄耶和華,並且輕慢祂(詩篇第十篇)。那時,死亡被當作生命,諸惡在善的外貌下行欺騙,因為為著蒙蔽悟性,一切善事的表象掩蓋了邪惡。因為那不能在人死後隨之而去的財富,反倒被人所愛。
lest at any time man should seek his lost wisdom, or the testament of life owed to him, he so infected all things with the juices of his craft, that he both clothed folly with the colour of wisdom, and overshadowed death with the allurements of a counterfeit life, so that men might not flee evils, seeing they did not discern the better things set over against them. Finally, from that time the human race goes about everywhere thus; folly is held for wisdom, the Psalmist saying: For the sinner is praised in the desires of his soul, and the wicked is blessed (Ps. 10). Then that is thought to be life which is death, and evils deceive under the appearance of good, since, to the fraud of the understanding, the semblance of all good things cloaks vice. For riches, which will not follow after the death of man, are loved.
284:134
Honor fascium, qui per successorem exolescat ambitur: injuriam fecisse virtus est; aliena possidere potentia est; innocentem circum venire astutiæ est; non Christum sapere sapientiæ est; prophetam horrere eloquentiæ est: sic plena sunt omnia erronbus, sic inCasa per hominum mentes caligine, alium alio incursante, mundus involvitur, et ad hoc usque veritas obscuratur, ut m mortis gremio jacuisse beatitudo dicatur. Quod ubi ille Deus, nos semper cogitans et Rostra, vidit per sapientiam niundi, qua sibi mundus collusor inlerpolatores invenerat, suam sapientiam inisse desertam;
高位的尊榮,雖藉著繼承者而消逝,人卻貪求;行了不義被算為美德;佔有他人之物被算為權勢;欺騙無辜之人被算為精明;不領略基督被算為智慧;厭懼先知被算為口才:如此,萬事都充滿了謬誤,如此,這世界因人心中固有的幽暗而被籠罩,彼此攻擊,真理竟被遮蔽到這地步,以致躺臥在死亡懷中反被稱為福樂。當那位常眷念我們並我們之事的神,藉著這世界的智慧——那世界既以自己為戲弄者,竟為己尋得作偽者——看出自己的智慧已被撇棄:
The honour of high office, which fades away through a successor, is coveted; to have done injury is counted virtue; to possess what belongs to another is power; to circumvent the innocent is shrewdness; not to savour of Christ is wisdom; to shudder at a prophet is eloquence: thus all things are full of errors, thus by an inborn darkness the world is enwrapped through the minds of men, one attacking another, and to such a point is truth obscured, that to have lain in the bosom of death is called blessedness. When that God, ever mindful of us and our affairs, saw through the wisdom of the world—by which the world, its own trifler, had found itself falsifiers—that His own wisdom had been forsaken:
284:135
placuit etiam ei econtrario adversus astutiam veteratoris, sapientiae suæ de vitiis innumerabilibus uti, et scientiae altitudinem, quam nullus poterit investigare, sicuti est, et suam sapientiam stultitia velare, et vitam suam mortis quadam obscuritate celare, ut ad sapientiam pervenire non posset, qui in hoc saeculo opinionem stultitiae fugisset, et ad vitam ejus non accederet, qui non contemptum mortis habuisset. Namque sic Filium Salvatorem nostrum misit in hominem, id est Sapientiam suam carne vestivit, quod stultum est: viam suam pati crucem fecit, quod mors est.
於是祂也反其道,為要抵擋那老謀深算者的詭詐,樂意運用祂的智慧來對付無數的罪惡,並用愚拙遮蓋那無人能按其本相測透的知識之高深,並祂自己的智慧,又用死亡的某種幽暗隱藏祂自己的生命,好使那在這世上躲避愚拙之名聲的人不能達到智慧,那沒有藐視死亡的人也不能親近祂的生命。因為祂如此差遣祂的兒子我們的救主進入人裡面——就是將祂的智慧披上肉體,這在人看為愚拙;祂使自己的道路承受十字架,這就是死亡。
it pleased Him also, on the contrary, against the cunning of that old schemer, to make use of His wisdom concerning innumerable vices, and to veil the height of knowledge—which none will be able to search out as it is—and His own wisdom, with folly, and to hide His own life with a certain obscurity of death, so that he might not be able to attain to wisdom who in this world had fled the reputation of folly, and might not approach to His life who had not held death in contempt. For thus He sent His Son our Saviour into man—that is, He clothed His Wisdom with flesh, which is foolishness; He made His Way to suffer the cross, which is death.
284:136
Sic adversus adversa destruxit, et per dissimiles ante saecula operationes ingenii artificis illius machinas elisit, ut partibus quibusdam salutaribus vestigiis, licet impressa, mortifera Ulius stigmata delerentur. Sed hoc studium, nisi concupierimus, quod quoniam stultum est Dei, sapientius est hominibus (I Cor. I), sapientiam ejus non tenebimus. Hanc autem mortem, quod crux est, nisi amaverimus, qnoniam quod infirmum est Dei, fortius est hominibus, vitam ejus non poterimus intrare. Quid igitur sequitur, nisi ut relicta sæculi et sapientia et vita, et stultos nos habcri patiamur, et mori nos cum Domino semper optemus ?
祂如此以逆境勝過逆境,並藉著與往世不同的作為,粉碎了那狡詐工匠才智的機關,好使藉著某些帶來拯救的足跡(雖已被印下),那惡者致命的烙印得以塗抹。但這追求,我們若不切慕它——因為神的愚拙總比人智慧(林前一章)——我們就不能持守祂的智慧。而這死亡,就是十字架,我們若不愛它——因為神的軟弱總比人剛強——我們就不能進入祂的生命。那麼所餘下的是什麼呢,豈不就是:撇棄這世界的智慧與生命,甘願被人看為愚拙,並常願與主同死嗎?
Thus He destroyed adverse things by adverse, and by operations unlike those of the ages before, He shattered the engines of that crafty artificer's ingenuity, so that by certain salutary footprints, though impressed, the death-dealing brands of that one might be blotted out. But this pursuit, unless we shall desire it—because that which is foolish of God is wiser than men (1 Cor. 1)—we shall not hold fast His wisdom. And this death, which is the cross, unless we shall love it—because that which is weak of God is stronger than men—we shall not be able to enter into His life. What then follows, save that, forsaking both the wisdom and the life of the world, we both suffer ourselves to be held as fools, and ever wish to die with the Lord?
284:137
ut in spe adventus ejus, qui utriusque erit rei revelatio, partem aliquam habere mereamur. Tunc enim, scissis omnibus veiamentis, talia qualia sunt singula cuncta cernentur, id est stultitia mundialis falsae sapientiæ involucris denudata sistetur, et mors mentite beatiludinis deoperta velamine, hiante semper ore et paente in profundum gutture, vitalium inimica prodeur. Tunc et coelestis sapientia, quae sæculariter stultitia nominator, interposita altitudinem scientiæ Dei, Iine alicujus labore elurubrationis intrabit, eI vera vita nullis mortis teneris chscurata lucebit, per Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum, cui est honor in sxcula sceculorum. Amen. 150CAP, XVIII.
……好叫我們在盼望祂降臨——那將是這兩件事的顯明——之中,配得有分於其中。因為到那時,一切帕子被撕裂,各樣事物都必照其本相被看清:就是說,屬世的愚拙必被剝去虛假智慧的包裹而顯露;死亡也必被揭去假冒福樂的帕子——它的口總是張開,喉嚨向著深淵敞開——顯為生命之物的仇敵。到那時,那被屬世人稱為愚拙的屬天智慧,插入了神知識的高深,必毫不費力地進來,不需任何挑燈苦讀;真實的生命,不被任何死亡的幽暗所遮蔽,必發出光輝,藉著我們的主耶穌基督,願榮耀歸與祂,直到世世代代。阿們。第十八章。
…that in the hope of His coming, which will be the revelation of both things, we may deserve to have some part. For then, when all the veils are rent, each and every thing shall be discerned as it truly is: that is, worldly folly, stripped of the wrappings of false wisdom, shall be set forth; and death, uncovered of the veil of counterfeit blessedness—its mouth ever gaping and its throat open into the deep—shall come forth as the enemy of things vital. Then too the heavenly wisdom, which is worldly-wise called folly, having interposed the height of the knowledge of God, shall enter without the labour of any lucubration, and true life, obscured by no darkness of death, shall shine, through our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom is honour unto the ages of ages. Amen. CHAP. XVIII.
284:138
Vides, o fili, qua valetudine laborat animus suspecti, qui ista non cogitat. Corpusculo adhibui palpamenta, quod si negligerem, anima plus valeret, quæ tunc infirmatur, cum exterior roboratur. Sed istam quam dixi animam morbo stultitiæ vitiatam, orationum tuarum frequentatus sanet, cujus anima sæculi intemerata flagitiis potest aliis subvenire. Non enim æger salutis suæ a adhibere potesl medelam ægrotatione confossis, et anhelans attitudinem plagarum vulneribus non medetur alienis. Sanus qui sit certe curabit infirmum, oculatus cæcum per præcipitia non ducit. Tu itaque ut et sapiens Domino supplica, ut quod non sapui sapiam, et tuis suffragiisvelatquibusdam remediis me fac sanari.
——兒子啊,你看那不思想這些事、心懷疑懼之人的靈魂是害了何等的病。我曾為這小小的身體施以撫慰之法,其實我若忽略它,靈魂反倒更強健——就是那當外在的人被強壯時反而衰弱的靈魂。但願你那時常獻上的禱告,醫治我所說被愚拙之病所污損的靈魂——你的靈魂既未被世上的罪惡玷污,便能拯救別人。因為病人不能將自己健康的醫治施給那被疾病所刺透的人,喘息垂危之人也不能醫治別人深重的創傷。唯有健全的人才能醫治患病的,明眼的人不會領瞎子走過險崖。所以你要如同智者一般懇求主,使我在所未曾明智之處得著智慧;並藉你的代求,如同藉某些良藥,使我得醫治。
—You see, O son, with what sickness the soul of one under suspicion labours, who does not consider these things. I have applied soothing remedies to the little body, whereas, if I neglected it, the soul would be the stronger—the soul which is weakened when the outer man is fortified. But may your frequented prayers heal this soul which I have said is corrupted by the disease of folly—you whose soul, unstained by the crimes of the world, is able to succour others. For the sick man cannot apply a cure of his own health to those pierced through by illness, and one gasping cannot heal the depth of another's wounds. Only he who is sound will heal the infirm; the sighted does not lead the blind through precipices. Do you therefore, as one wise, supplicate the Lord, that what I have not been wise in, I may be wise in; and by your intercessions, as by certain remedies, cause me to be healed.
284:139
Reprehendat aliquis quod in 'alitum dolectabili disputatione processerim, ut meritorum meorum resipiscentiam non haberem, aut subito angustam Moysi cathedram indignus talium disputator ascenderim. Sed vere amore id egi tuo, non usurpatione mea. Nam ego dictum legeram peccatori, ne Domini audertt narrare justitias per os suum. Quod si contra inlerdictum pro tua dilectione præsumpsi, in eo tua gratia coMpensare dignabitur: ut litterulas, quæ ad plenum emendatæ non sant (sicut ipsis apicibus quibus exarantur apparet) tam facile ad publicum non perducas: etsi ego verecundus pro me esse non potui ut debui, vel tua modestia verecundiæ parcat meæ.
或有人責備我竟進入這關於崇高之事的令人愉悅的辯論之中,以致我沒有與自己功過相稱的悔改,又或責備我這不配之人竟驟然登上摩西狹窄的座位,作這等事的辯論者。但我實在是出於對你的愛而行此,並非出於我自己的僭越。因為我曾讀過那對罪人所說的話,就是他不可膽敢用自己的口述說主的公義。但我若違背禁令、為著我對你的愛而擅自行事,願你的恩惠在此俯就補償:就是不要輕易將這些尚未完全修正的短箋公之於眾(正如從書寫它們的筆跡本身便可看出);即使我不能像我所當的那樣為自己害羞,至少願你的謙和顧惜我的羞怯。
Let someone reproach me that I have proceeded into a delightful disputation of lofty matters, so that I might not have a repentance proportioned to my deserts, or that, unworthy, I have suddenly ascended the narrow chair of Moses as a disputant of such things. But truly I have done this out of love for you, not by any usurpation of my own. For I had read the saying to the sinner, that he should not dare to declare the justices of the Lord through his own mouth. But if, against the prohibition, I have presumed for the sake of my love for you, in that your grace will deign to make compensation: that you not so easily bring to publication these little letters, which are not fully corrected (as appears from the very characters in which they are traced); and even if I could not be modest on my own behalf as I ought, let at least your modesty spare my bashfulness.
284:140
Et quia de me habent quod male scriptæ sunt, de te habeant quod celentur. Vale, et nos in Domino dilige, in quo diligeris a nobis.
既然它們寫得拙劣是出於我,那麼願它們得以被隱藏是出於你。願你平安,並在主裡愛我們,正如你在主裡也被我們所愛。
And because they have from me the fact that they are badly written, let them have from you the fact that they be kept hidden. Farewell, and love us in the Lord, in whom you are loved by us.
← 第 283 章
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284