📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 講道集

都靈的馬克西姆斯

講道集 第 46 章

拉丁文原文.10 節.部分字詞可點開查義

← 第 45 章第 47 章 →
46:1
Magna est scriptorum de auctore, de titulo,. deque initio hujusce homiliæ dissensio. Qui in codices Vallicellanum II, et Valicanum 6452 eam intulere calligraphi, sancto Leoni Magno adjudicandam existimarunt. Sed hos Ballerinii fratres in celebri editione operum ejus sancti pontificis nihili faciendos esse putarunt. In codice Vaticano Palatino 4951 omittitur auctoris nomen. Eam in Ambrosianos sermones conjecit Gillotius editor Parisiensis opp. Ambrosianorum, quem secuti sunt curatores Romanae Sixti editionis. Nobis autem est, esse Maximo asserendam. Cur autem sic statuamus causæ sunt sane multae.
關於這篇講道的作者、標題和開端,作者們之間存在着極大的分歧。把它插入抄本瓦利切利第二號與梵蒂岡第六四五二號的抄寫員們,以為它必須判給聖大良(Leo the Great)。但巴勒里尼(Ballerini)兄弟在那位聖教宗著作的著名版本中,認為這些人不足取。在梵蒂岡帕拉丁第四九五一號抄本中,作者之名被省略了。巴黎版安波羅修著作的編者吉洛提烏斯(Gillotius)把它歸入安波羅修的講道之中,羅馬西斯篤版的編訂者也跟隨了他。但在我們看來,它必須被斷定歸於瑪西穆斯。而我們如此判定的理由實在很多。
Great is the disagreement of the writers concerning the author, the title, and the opening of this homily. The scribes who inserted it into the codices Vallicellianus II and Vaticanus 6452 supposed it must be adjudged to St Leo the Great. But the Ballerini brothers, in the celebrated edition of the works of that holy pontiff, thought these of no account. In the codex Vaticanus Palatinus 4951 the author's name is omitted. Gillotius, the Parisian editor of the Ambrosian works, cast it among the Ambrosian sermons, whom the curators of the Roman Sixtine edition followed. But to us it seems that it must be asserted for Maximus. And the reasons why we so determine are indeed many.
46:2
Nam et nexus cum homilia superiore satis, et stylus qui plane Maximianus est, et ratio adducendorum locorum sacræ Scripturæ quae certe est Maximo peculiaris, ct codices mss. insigniores, ut Sangallensis, ut 99 Sancte Crucis in Jerusalem, ut Taurinensis, ut Laurentianus x, Plut. xiv, in eam nos sententiam induxerunt; in qua eo sumus majorem in modum confirmati, quo monachi Benedictini congregat. Sancti Mauri, eam esse apad Maximum videndam moneant in sua sermonum sancli Ambrosii collectione. Maximo item eam ascribunt Gymnicus, Galesinius, Cumdius, Raynaudus et Margarinus. Ac de auctore quidem hujus homiliæ hactenus. Nunc de titulo.
因為與前一篇講道的連繫(這已足夠),還有那顯然屬瑪西穆斯風格的文體,以及那引證聖經章節的方式(這確是瑪西穆斯所特有的),並那些更顯著的抄本——如聖加侖抄本、如耶路撒冷聖十字堂第九十九號、如都靈抄本、如勞倫斯抄本(第十四櫃)——把我們引向那看法;我們在其中愈發被堅固,因為聖毛爾會眾的本篤會修士們在他們所收集的聖安波羅修講道集中提醒說,它應在瑪西穆斯的著作中尋找。同樣,金尼庫斯、加勒西尼烏斯、庫姆狄烏斯、雷諾杜斯與瑪爾加里努斯也把它歸給瑪西穆斯。關於這篇講道的作者,至此為止。如今論到標題。
For both the connection with the preceding homily, which is sufficient, and the style, which is plainly Maximian, and the manner of adducing passages of holy Scripture, which is certainly peculiar to Maximus, and the more notable manuscripts—such as the St Gall, such as codex 99 of Santa Croce in Jerusalem, such as the Turin, such as the Laurentian (Plut. XIV)—led us to that opinion; in which we are confirmed the more greatly, in that the Benedictine monks of the Congregation of St Maur advise, in their collection of the sermons of St Ambrose, that it is to be sought among the works of Maximus. Likewise Gymnicus, Galesinius, Cumdius, Raynaudus, and Margarinus ascribe it to Maximus. And so much concerning the author of this homily. Now concerning the title.
46:3
Is in codicibus Sangallensi, et Taurinensi, et apud Gymnicum, Galesinium, Raynaudum, Cumdium, Margarinum est: De sancto latrone. In Laurenliano x: De sancta passione. In Sanctae Crucis in Jerusalem 99: De die sancto Paschæ. In VaLicano Palatino 4951: De fide sancti latronis, qui in cruce Dominum confessu. est. Nos pervulgatum adsciscendum nohis putavimus, qui ut animadvertimus, est De sancto introne. Restat locus de homiliæ initio. In codicibus Vaticano 645i et Vallicellano II est hujusmodi: Audit in praesenti dilectio vestra, fratres, quid sit, quod iste latro in cruce Domini constituto non solum peccatorum suorum veniam consequitur, sed etiam paradisi amænitate donatur, etc.
在聖加侖與都靈抄本中,以及在金尼庫斯、加勒西尼烏斯、雷諾杜斯、庫姆狄烏斯、瑪爾加里努斯那裡,作:「論聖潔的強盜。」在勞倫斯抄本中:「論聖潔的受難。」在耶路撒冷聖十字堂第九十九號中:「論聖復活節之日。」在梵蒂岡帕拉丁第四九五一號中:「論那在十字架上承認主的聖潔強盜的信德。」我們認為當採用那通行的標題,正如我們所觀察的,即「論聖潔的強盜」。剩下的是關於講道開端的段落。在梵蒂岡第六四五一號與瓦利切利第二號抄本中,是如此這般:「弟兄們,你們的親愛之情此刻聽見,這是甚麼——就是這強盜,當主被安置在十字架上時,不僅得着他罪的赦免,甚至被賜予樂園的美境,如此云云。」
In the St Gall and Turin codices, and among Gymnicus, Galesinius, Raynaudus, Cumdius, Margarinus, it is: 'On the holy thief.' In the Laurentian codex: 'On the holy passion.' In codex 99 of Santa Croce in Jerusalem: 'On the holy day of Easter.' In the Vatican Palatine 4951: 'On the faith of the holy thief, who upon the cross confessed the Lord.' We have thought that the commonly received one is to be adopted by us, which, as we have observed, is 'On the holy thief.' There remains the passage concerning the opening of the homily. In the codices Vaticanus 6451 and Vallicellianus II it is of this kind: 'Your charity hears in the present, brethren, what this is, that this thief, when the Lord was set upon the cross, not only obtains pardon for his sins, but is even granted the delightfulness of paradise, etc.'
46:4
In editione Sixtina operum sancti Ambrosii: Quoniam hodie Evangelii lectio de latrone fecit mentionem, videamus, etc. Neutram harum lectionum secuti sumus. Eam probavimus quæ cl insignioribus codicibus continetur, et firmata est editorum consensione. Quoniam hesterno die de latrone fecimus mentionem, videamus quis iste latro sit, qui in cruce Domino constituto non solum peccatorum suorum veniam consequitur, sed etiam paradisi amœnitate donatur: ut qui propter scelera damnatus fuerat ad poenam, propter fidem transferretur c ad gloriam, fueritque illi crux, quam pertulit, non tam supplicii damnatio, quam salutis occasio. 2 In cruce enim posi* tus Christum a Dominum nostrum credidit crucifixum;
在聖安波羅修著作的西斯篤版中:「既然今日福音書的誦讀提到了那強盜,讓我們來看,如此云云。」我們沒有跟從這兩種讀法中的任何一種。我們贊同那載於更顯著抄本、並經編者一致確認的讀法:「既然我們昨日提到了那強盜,讓我們來看這強盜是誰——他當主被安置在十字架上時,不僅得着他罪的赦免,甚至被賜予樂園的美境:以致那因己罪被定罪受刑之人,卻因信德被遷入榮耀,而他所忍受的十字架,於他與其說是刑罰的定罪,不如說是救恩的契機。因為他被安置在十字架上,卻相信我們的主基督乃是被釘的一位;」
In the Sixtine edition of the works of St Ambrose: 'Since today's reading of the Gospel made mention of the thief, let us see, etc.' We have followed neither of these readings. We have approved the one which is contained in the more notable codices, and is confirmed by the agreement of the editors: 'Since yesterday we made mention of the thief, let us see who this thief is, who, when the Lord was set upon the cross, not only obtains pardon for his sins, but is even granted the delightfulness of paradise: so that he who had been condemned to punishment for his crimes, was for his faith translated to glory, and the cross which he endured was for him not so much the condemnation of torment as the occasion of salvation. For, set upon the cross, he believed our Lord Christ to be crucified;'
46:5
157 et ideo qui consortio passionis utitur, consortio paradisi condonatur. Beatus enim latro, dum supplicium patitur, regnum coeleste consequitur. Ecce reus dicitur,b sicut cui damnari e ad tempus expedivit. Non enim perveniret ad gloriam, si non contradictus esset ad pœnam. Videamus, inquam, cur tantorum criminum reus, tam cito a Salvatore paradisum promeretur; cum alii multorum temporum lacrymis frequentibusque jejuniis, vix delictorum suorum veniam consequantur. Magna, fratres,et multiplex causa est:
因此,那分享受難之交契的人,便被賜予樂園的交契。因為這蒙福的強盜,當他受刑之際,卻得着天上的國。看哪,他被稱為有罪,正如一個暫時被定罪對他有益的人。因為倘若他未被交付受刑,就不會得着榮耀。我說,讓我們來看:為何這犯了如此大罪之人,這麼快就從救主那裡贏得樂園;而其他人以多年的眼淚、頻繁的禁食,卻幾乎難以得着己罪的赦免。弟兄們,其緣由重大而多重:
and therefore he who partakes of the fellowship of the passion is granted the fellowship of paradise. For the blessed thief, while he suffers punishment, obtains the heavenly kingdom. Behold, he is called guilty, as one for whom it was expedient to be condemned for a time. For he would not have come to glory, had he not been delivered up to punishment. Let us see, I say, why the man guilty of such great crimes so quickly earns paradise from the Saviour; whereas others, with the tears of many seasons and with frequent fasts, scarcely obtain pardon for their offences. Great, brethren, and manifold is the cause:
46:6
primum, quod iste latro devotione fidei tam repente mutatus est, ut presentem poenam despiceret, ac de futura veniam precaretur, et magis crederet utile sibi esse de æterno judicio petere, quam d de temporali supplicio postulare; reminiscens enim scelerum suorum, et pœnitudinem gerens, plus incipite avere quod sperat, quam sentire quod patitur. f Potuit enim, I nisi de futuriS' amplius cogitasset, qui in Christum semel crediderat, de praesenti magis supplicio deprecari, h Deinde illud ad gratiam ejus majoris est meriti, quod Christum in cruce positum credidit, et passio, quae aliis Mandatum i fecit, illi ad fidem profecit; crucis enim passio multis scandalum fuit, sicut dicit ApOsiolus:
首先,這強盜因信德的虔誠竟如此突然地被改變,以致他輕看眼前的刑罰,卻為將來祈求赦免,並相信為自己就永恆的審判祈求,比就今世的刑罰懇求更為有益;因為他既記起自己的罪行、心懷悔改,便開始更渴慕他所盼望的,而非感受他所受的。因為,倘若他未更多思念將來之事,這已一次信入基督的人本可寧願為眼前的刑罰祈求。其次,於他的恩典更有功德的是:他相信被安置在十字架上的基督,而那對別人是絆腳石的受難,於他卻益於信德;因為十字架的受難對許多人是絆腳石,正如使徒所說:
first, that this thief was so suddenly changed by the devotion of faith, that he despised the present punishment, and begged pardon concerning the future, and believed it more useful for himself to petition concerning the eternal judgment than to entreat concerning the temporal torment; for, calling to mind his crimes and bearing repentance, he begins to long more for what he hopes than to feel what he suffers. For, had he not thought more about future things, he who had once believed in Christ could rather have prayed concerning the present torment. Then, that which is of greater merit for his grace is that he believed Christ set upon the cross, and the passion which to others was a stumbling block profited him unto faith; for the passion of the cross was to many a scandal, as the Apostle says:
46:7
Non autem prædicamus Christum crucifixum, Judæis quidem scandalum, gentibus autem stultitiam (I Cor. i). Recte ergo meretur paradisum, qui crucem Christi non putavit esse scandalum, sed virtutem; j dicit enim idem Apostolus: Ipsis vocatis Judæis Christum Dei virtutem, et Dei sapientiam (lbid.). Recte plane et Dominus huic donal paradisum, quia quem Judas Scarioth in hortulo paradisi distraxerat, hic in crucis patibulo confitetur. k Mira res: confitetur latro quem discipulus abnegavit; mira, inquam, res: latro honorificat patientem, quem Judas prodidit osculantem: 158 ab hoc pacis blandimenta venduntur, ab illo crucis vulnera praedicantur; ait enim:
「我們卻是傳釘十字架的基督,在猶太人為絆腳石,在外邦人為愚拙」(哥林多前書一章)。因此那不以基督的十字架為絆腳石、反以之為能力的人,理當配得樂園;因為同一位使徒說:「但在那蒙召的,無論是猶太人、希臘人,基督總為神的能力,神的智慧」(同上)。主也理當把樂園賜給這人,因為那被猶大依斯加略在樂園的小園中出賣的一位,這人卻在十字架的刑具上承認祂。奇妙之事:門徒所否認的,強盜卻承認;我說,奇妙之事:猶大以親吻所出賣的那受苦者,強盜卻尊崇祂:一個賣出了和平的親暱,另一個宣揚了十字架的創傷;因為他說:
'But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews indeed a stumbling block, but unto the Gentiles foolishness' (1 Corinthians 1). Rightly therefore does he merit paradise, who did not think the cross of Christ to be a stumbling block, but a power; for the same Apostle says: 'Unto them that are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God' (ibid.). Rightly indeed the Lord too grants paradise to this man, because Him whom Judas Iscariot had sold away in the little garden of paradise, this one confesses on the gibbet of the cross. A marvellous thing: the thief confesses Him whom the disciple denied; a marvellous thing, I say: the thief honours the suffering One whom Judas betrayed with a kiss: by the one the caresses of peace are sold, by the other the wounds of the cross are proclaimed; for he says:
46:8
Memento mei, Domine, cum veneri in regnum tuum (Luc. XXIII). l Hæc est Me! plena devotio, ut cum de vulneribus Domini profiuus sanguis cernitur, tunc de potestate ejus venia postuletur; cum videtur ejus humilitas, tunc magis m teneatur ejus divinitas; cum morti addictus putatur, tunc n regis illi bonorificentia deferatur. ' Iste enim fidelis latro non credidit moriturum quem annuntiat regnaturum; non putat subdendum inferis, quem dominatumm confitetur in 0 cœlo; non arbitratur eum apud tartarum detineri, a quo etiam se postulat liberari. Cernat licet ejus hiantia vulnera; spectet ipsius sanguinem profluentem, p Deum tamen credit? quem reum nescit; juslum fatetur, quem non meminit peccatorem:
「主啊,你得國降臨的時候,求你記念我」(路加福音二十三章)。這是滿溢的虔誠:當人從主的創傷中看見湧流的血,那時就當就祂的權能祈求赦免;當人看見祂的卑微,那時就當愈發持守祂的神性;當人以為祂被交付於死,那時就當把君王的尊榮歸給祂。因為這忠信的強盜並不相信那他所宣告將要作王的一位會死;他不認為那他所承認在天上掌權的一位會屈服於下界的權勢;他不判斷那他甚至懇求得着釋放的一位被拘留在地獄。任憑他看見祂張裂的傷口、注視祂湧流的血:他仍相信那他不知有罪的一位是神;他承認那他不記得是罪人的一位是義的:
'Remember me, Lord, when thou shalt come into thy kingdom' (Luke 23). This is a devotion full to overflowing, that when the flowing blood is seen from the Lord's wounds, then pardon should be asked concerning His power; when His lowliness is seen, then His divinity should the more be held; when He is thought to be given over to death, then the honour of a king should be paid to Him. For this faithful thief did not believe that the one whom he announces as about to reign would die; he does not think that the one whom he confesses to have dominion in heaven would be made subject to the powers below; he does not judge that He, from whom he even asks to be freed, is detained in Tartarus. Let him behold His gaping wounds; let him gaze on His flowing blood: yet he believes Him to be God whom he knows not to be guilty; he confesses Him just whom he does not remember as a sinner:
46:9
ait enim illi alteri exprobranti latroni: Nos quidem recte digna factis recipimus; hic autem nihil mali gessit (Ibid.). Intellexit enim, quod pro alienis peccatis has plagas susciperet, pro alienis sceleribus haec vulnera q sustineret; et scivit, quod illa in corpore Christi vulnera, non essent Christi vulnera, sed latronis; atque ideo plus amare coepit, postquam in corpore ejus sua vulnera recognovit. Ait enim propheta: Quoniam ipae infirmitates nostras portat, et pro nobis dolet; nos autem existimabamus eum esse in dolore, r livore ejus sanati sumus (Isai. LIII). Plus ergo in cruce positus s livorem ejus cernens, latro t diligit Deum: mira res:
因為他對那譏誚的另一強盜說:「我們是應當的,因我們所受的與我們所做的相稱;但這個人沒有做過一件不好的事」(同上)。因為他明白,祂是為他人的罪領受這些擊打,為他人的罪行承受這些創傷;他也曉得,基督身上的那些創傷不是基督的創傷,而是強盜的創傷;因此他既在祂身上認出了自己的創傷,便開始更加愛祂。因為先知說:「祂誠然擔當我們的憂患,為我們悲痛;我們卻以為祂受苦,因祂受的鞭傷我們得醫治」(以賽亞書五十三章)。所以那強盜被安置在十字架上、看見祂的鞭傷,便更加愛神:奇妙之事:
for he says to that other thief who reviled: 'We indeed rightly receive things worthy of our deeds; but this man has done nothing evil' (ibid.). For he understood that He was receiving these blows for the sins of others, sustaining these wounds for the crimes of others; and he knew that those wounds in the body of Christ were not the wounds of Christ, but of the thief; and therefore he began to love Him the more, after he recognized his own wounds in His body. For the prophet says: 'Because He Himself bears our infirmities, and grieves for us; but we esteemed Him to be in grief, and by His bruise we are healed' (Isaiah 53). More therefore, set upon the cross and beholding His bruise, does the thief love God: a marvellous thing:
46:10
plus in cruce latro Christum diligit, quam Judas dilexit in coena: ille per cibum supplantat Magistrum; hic cret Dominum per dolorem, sicut ait propheta: Qui edebat pane meos u adampliavit adversum me supplantationem (Psal. XL). Cognovit igitur hic latro omnem Domini passionem ex ipsius fieri voluntante, et in potestate ejus esse vel a morti 159 animam tradere, vel ad vitam iterum remeare, sicut ipse Dominus ait: Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et tem habeo 160 iterum sumendi eam Joan, X adeo autem illum liberum ab inferni legibu vit, ut etiam se ab iis posceret libcrari.
在十字架上,強盜愛基督,勝過猶大在晚餐時愛祂:一個藉食物暗算他的老師;這一個藉苦難相信主,正如先知所說:「吃我食物的,用腳踢我」(詩篇四十一篇)。所以這強盜認出:主的整個受難乃出於祂自己的意願,並且在祂權柄之內,或把祂的性命交給死,或再度返回生命,正如主親自所說:「我有權柄捨去我的性命,也有權柄再取回來」(約翰福音十章);而他如此承認祂脫離陰間的律例,以致甚至懇求藉祂脫離這些律例。
on the cross the thief loves Christ more than Judas loved Him at the supper: the one through food supplants his Master; this one believes the Lord through suffering, as the prophet says: 'He who ate my bread magnified his supplanting against me' (Psalm 41). This thief therefore recognized that the whole passion of the Lord came to pass by His own will, and that it was in His power either to deliver up His soul to death, or to return again to life, as the Lord Himself says: 'I have power to lay down my soul, and I have power to take it up again' (John 10); and so free from the laws of hell did he acknowledge Him, that he asked even to be freed by Him from them.
← 第 45 章第 47 章 →
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284