📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original

← All books · Latin Fathers › Sermons

Maximus of Turin

Sermons 284 part 3/4

Latin original · 37 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 284:77–284:113 (140 verses in all)

← ch. 283
← prev partnext part →
284:77
enim divitibus, quoniam receperunt mercedem suam; sed illis divitibus quibus dicendum erit: Esurivi, et non dedistis mihi manducare; sitivi, et non potastis me (Matth. xxv). Illis utique divitibus qui de injusto mammona amicos facere noluerant, qui meditati sunt in cogitationibus suis, exuberante fructu, quo neminem refrigerabant, nova immensis fructibus receptacula moliri, a qui ubi in crastinum comederent ignorabant. Anima eorum eo tempore expostulabatur, sub una tamen nocte vana sollicitudine occupata, cum thesaurizare non cessaverint, nec defossis invigilare opibus omiserint. Hinc Lazarus pauper cum eo patriarcha qui peregrinus vixit in mundo, lætatur in cubili suo.
For 'woe to the rich, for they have received their reward' (cf. Luke 6); but to those rich to whom it must be said: 'I was hungry, and ye gave me not to eat; I was thirsty, and ye gave me not to drink' (Matt. 25). To those rich, assuredly, who had refused to make friends of the unjust mammon; who meditated in their thoughts, when the fruit overflowed by which they refreshed no one, to build new storehouses for immense harvests — who knew not where they should eat on the morrow. Their soul was demanded of them at that time, occupied within a single night by vain solicitude, since they ceased not to lay up treasure, nor omitted to keep watch over buried wealth. Hence Lazarus the poor man, with that patriarch who lived as a stranger in the world, rejoices in his resting place.
因為「你們富足的人有禍了,因為你們受過你們的安慰」(參路六);然而尤指那些必要被對他們說這話的富人:「我餓了,你們不給我吃;我渴了,你們不給我喝。」(太二十五)確實是指那些不肯用不義之財為自己結交朋友的富人;他們心中盤算,在果實滿溢、卻不叫任何人得舒暢之際,為浩大的收成建造新的倉房——卻不知明日在何處吃飯。他們的靈魂在那時被取去,只在一夜之間便被虛妄的憂慮所纏累,因他們積財不止,看守埋藏的財物毫不放鬆。因此,那貧窮的拉撒路,與那在世上作客旅而活的先祖一同,在自己的居所中歡樂。
284:78
At dives e contra, in aeternis flagrat incendiis, et omni expoliatus dignitate atque substantia, despecti quondam inopis divinumimplorat auxilium, ejusque vel minimo exoptat digitulo contingi, cujus egestatem inter opimas dapes suas et copiosa convivia ne micis quidem de mensa decidentibus sustentabat. Cum itaque præscriptum judicium per nos, id est per sanctos est celebrandum, nobis vindicta in nationes et in populos est donata. Quod cum cogitatar, quæ in nobis mens, quis ardor animi, quod desiderium futurorum, quis præsentium contemptus, facilius sentiri quam dici potest. Aut quis est qui non ad ista festinans, dissolvi se cupiat et esse cum Christo (Philip. I) ?
But the rich man, on the contrary, burns in eternal fires, and, stripped of all dignity and substance, implores the divine aid of the poor man he once despised, and longs to be touched by even the smallest little finger of him whose destitution he sustained not, amid his rich banquets and abundant feasts, with so much as the crumbs falling from the table. Since, therefore, the prescribed judgment is to be celebrated through us — that is, through the saints — vengeance upon the nations and upon the peoples has been granted to us. When this is pondered, what mind is in us, what ardor of soul, what desire of things to come, what contempt of present things, can more easily be felt than told. Or who is there who, hastening to these things, would not desire to be dissolved and to be with Christ (Phil. 1)?
然而那財主卻正相反,在永火中焚燒,被剝去了一切尊嚴與財產,向他曾藐視的窮人懇求神聖的救助,渴望能被那人最小的小指頭指尖觸一下——就是他在自己豐盛的筵席與滿滿的宴樂中,連桌上掉下的碎屑都不肯供養的那人。既然那所定的審判要藉我們——就是藉聖徒——來施行,向列國與萬民施報的權柄便已賜給了我們。當人思念此事時,我們裡面存著何等的心思,何等的靈之熱忱,何等對將來之事的渴慕,何等對現今之事的藐視,這是易於感受過於言說的。或者,有誰急切奔向這些事,卻不巴不得離世與基督同在呢(腓一)?
284:79
aut quid magnum est, si pro tantis ac talibus bonis mors contemnatur, pro quibus etiam hæc vita contemnenda est? Quoniam pro his qui perdiderit animam suam, salvat illam. At contra qui hic salvaverit animam suam perdet eam. Etenim cum plerique in hoc mundo velut furialibus flammis ita sint animi ambitione succensi, ut non opibus conditis, nec patrimoniis, Dee ipsis quoque filiis parcant, quos etiam de avaritia accusati opponere consueverunt, dum præfecturas consularitatesque mercentur, quas potestates et mors adimit, et successor excludit:
Or what great thing is it, if for goods so many and so excellent death is held in contempt, goods for which even this present life ought to be held in contempt? For 'whoever loses his soul for their sake shall save it.' But, on the contrary, 'whoever here shall save his soul shall lose it.' For whereas very many in this world are so inflamed in spirit by ambition, as if by furious flames, that they spare neither their hoarded riches nor their patrimonies, nor even their own sons—whom, when they are accused of avarice, they are wont to put forward as an excuse—while they purchase prefectships and consulships, offices which death takes away and a successor shuts out:
或者,若為了如此眾多、如此美好的福分而輕看死亡,這又有何偉大可言呢?連今生也當為這些福分的緣故而被輕看。因為「凡為這些福分喪掉自己性命的,必救了性命。」但反過來,「凡在此救自己性命的,必喪掉性命。」因為世上有極多的人,心靈被野心如同被狂暴的火焰所點燃,以致他們既不顧惜所積蓄的財富,也不顧惜產業,甚至連自己的兒子也不顧惜——當他們被控貪婪時,慣常把兒子搬出來作藉口——同時他們用錢購買總督與執政官之職,這些權位死亡會奪去,繼任者也會將人排擠出去:
284:80
quæ dementia est non ea potius impensis omnibus et detrimento vitæ ipsius comparare, quae promotos faciant vel de vitae æternitate securos, vel de judicii perpetua dignitate gloriosos ?, CAP. IX. — Tempus admonet, et locus ipse suggerit, nec materia videtur aliena, quoniam de meritis coepimus tractare sanctorum, ut b infelicissimae infelicitatis blasphemias diluamus quæ ad hanc videtur speciem pertinere.
what madness is it not rather to procure, at the cost of all one's expenses and at the loss of life itself, those things which make the advanced either secure concerning life eternal, or glorious concerning the perpetual dignity of the judgment? CHAP. IX.—The time admonishes us, the very place suggests it, nor does the subject-matter seem foreign, since we have begun to treat of the merits of the saints, that we may wash away the blasphemies of a most wretched wretchedness which seem to belong to this same theme.
那麼,若不寧可傾盡一切費用、甚至捨去生命本身,去換取那使被提拔者在永生上得穩妥、在審判永恆的尊榮上得榮耀的事物,這豈不是瘋狂嗎?第九章——時機提醒我們,此地本身也啟發我們,這題材也不顯得偏離,因為我們既已開始論述聖徒的功德,就當洗刷那極不幸之不幸所發出、似乎正屬此類的褻瀆之言。
284:81
Exstiterunt enim qui virtutes egregias et coelestes per sanctorum reliquias jam utique prope nostris temporibus operantes, maluerunt detractione mordere quam veneratione suscipere, antiquum illud venenum in Dei famulos Judaicæ infidelitatis evomentes, quod illi quondam in ipsum Dominum viperinis linguis et mortiferis sibilis effuderunt dicentes: In qua potestate hoc facis ? el quis tibi dedit hanc potestatem (Matth. xxv)? Recitabant namque nobis juxta positis, quæ divinis et beatissimis Gervasio et Protasio infidelitas stulta loquebatur, quos dum papæ Ambrosio aliquid decerpere machinantur, violare sacrilegis sermonibus non timebant, hoc modo rationem miraculorum conquirentes.
For there have arisen men who, when eminent and heavenly virtues were being wrought through the relics of the saints even in almost our own times, chose rather to gnaw at them with detraction than to receive them with veneration, vomiting forth against the servants of God that ancient poison of Jewish unbelief which those men once poured out against the Lord Himself with viperous tongues and deadly hissings, saying: 'By what power do you do this? and who gave you this power?' (Matt. 21). For they were reciting to us, who stood near, the things which foolish unbelief was uttering against the divine and most blessed Gervasius and Protasius; and while they contrive to pluck something away from Pope Ambrose, they did not fear to violate them with sacrilegious words, seeking in this manner a rationale for the miracles.
因為有些人興起,當眾聖徒的遺骸甚至在幾近我們這時代仍施行卓越而屬天的神蹟時,他們寧願以毀謗來咬齧這些神蹟,也不願以敬崇來領受,把猶太人不信的那古老毒液向神的僕人吐出——就是那些人從前用毒蛇般的舌頭和致命的嘶聲向主自己傾吐的:「你憑什麼權柄作這事?又是誰給你這權柄?」(太二十一章)因為他們向我們這些近旁站立的人複述那愚昧的不信對神聖至福的熱爾瓦削與普洛大削所說的話;他們一面圖謀從安博羅削主教身上奪去些什麼,一面竟不懼以褻瀆之言侵犯這二位聖徒,用這種方式來尋究神蹟的緣由。
284:82
Quid est istud, quod ex eo quod martyres sunt, virtutum dona meruerunt? Cur tam tarde quod jam pridem illis concessum est exercetur? Aut si ea tempestate cum passi sunt non ostenderunt, quomodo nunc operati sunt? Quid est hoc quod modo videntur ostendere? aut illos majores revelatione Ambrosius fecit c quam dignatio martyrii ? Agnoscitisne, aliis licet 139 verbis, ita mendaciter, quod de Domino prodidimus martyribus ingestum: In qua potestate hoc facis ? et quis tibi hanc dedit potestatem (Matth. XXI)? Tepida, ut arbitror, consolatio, et de livore generata, quaerere an divinum sit quod videas esse divinum; et rationem poscere, cum credere sit necesse. Et cum Apostolus dicat:
'What is this,' they say, 'that from the fact that they are martyrs, they should have merited the gifts of miracles? Why is that exercised so late which was granted to them long ago? Or if in that storm when they suffered they did not display these powers, how have they now wrought them? What is this that they now seem to display? Or did Ambrose make them greater by revelation than the dignity of martyrdom made them?' Do you recognize—though in other words, yet just as falsely—what we have shown was cast against the Lord, now heaped upon the martyrs: 'By what power do you do this? and who gave you this power?' (Matt. 21). A lukewarm consolation, I think, and one begotten of envy: to inquire whether that be divine which you see to be divine, and to demand a rationale when it is necessary to believe. And whereas the Apostle says:
他們說:「這是怎麼回事,這些人單憑他們是殉道者,就配得神蹟的恩賜?為何早已賜給他們的能力,如今才這樣遲地施展出來?或者,若他們在受難的那場風暴中沒有顯出這些能力,如今又怎麼行出來了?他們如今所似乎顯出的,究竟是什麼?難道安博羅削藉著啟示,使他們比殉道的尊榮所造就的更為偉大嗎?」你們豈不認出——雖然用了別的言語,卻同樣虛謊地——我們已指出從前投向主的話,如今被堆在殉道者身上:「你憑什麼權柄作這事?又是誰給你這權柄?」(太二十一章)我認為,這是一種冷淡的安慰,且是由嫉妒所生的:去追問你所見顯然是屬神的,是否屬神;在必須信的時候卻索求緣由。況且使徒也說:
284:83
Caritas omnia credit (I Cor. XIII): quis dubitat quod sine caritate Dei sunt qui fldem tantis non applicuere virtutibus? Negat autem fidem qui quasi tentator inquiti: Unde hæc potestas ? quasi non manifestum sit in ea sanctos martyres nunc in spiritu miracula facere, in qua potestate adversarios suos prius in carne et in passione vicerunt. Conferamus pedem contra istos ( si dici fas est) fllios Judæcorum, et ut nuper eorum parentem, id est Judæum, d qui se in sacriflcio prudentem nimium putabat, dono Deitatis oppressimus; ita et hancsub Christiano nomine blasphemiarum sobolem destruamus, per eum qui dixit: Perdam sapientiam sapientum, et prudentiam prudentium reprobabo (1 Cor. I):
'Charity believes all things' (1 Cor. 13): who doubts that those are without the charity of God who have not applied faith to such great miracles? But he denies the faith who, like a tempter, inquires: 'Whence this power?'—as though it were not manifest that the holy martyrs now work miracles in the Spirit by that same power in which they formerly conquered their adversaries in the flesh and in their passion. Let us set foot against these (if it is right so to say) sons of the Jews, and, as lately we overwhelmed by the gift of the Godhead their parent, that is, the Jew, who thought himself exceedingly clever in his sacrifice, so let us also destroy this offspring of blasphemies under the Christian name, through Him who said: 'I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the prudence of the prudent I will reject' (1 Cor. 1):
「愛是凡事相信」(林前十三章):誰能懷疑,那些不肯把信德歸於如此偉大之神蹟的人,是缺乏神的愛的呢?凡像試探者一樣追問「這權柄從何而來?」的人,就是否認信德——好像聖潔的殉道者如今在聖神裡所行的神蹟,並非出於他們從前在肉身中、在受難時勝過仇敵所憑的那同一權柄,這事還不夠明顯似的。讓我們挺身抵擋這些猶太人的子孫(若可以這樣說),並且正如我們不久前藉神性的恩賜壓倒了他們的先祖,就是那自以為在獻祭上極其精明的猶太人一樣,也讓我們藉那位說「我要滅絕智慧人的智慧,廢棄聰明人的聰明」(林前一章)的主,摧毀這頂著基督徒之名的褻瀆之苗裔:
284:84
ut et nos In triumpho gemino per Dominum gloriemur, et illi agnoscant intelligentiam rerum divinarum in fide catholica, non in sapientia sæculi constitutam, monente Domino: nisi credideritis, non intelligetis (Isai. VII): ut manifestius constet et fidelibus patere infidelitatis obscura, et ab infidelibus fidelitatis etiam plana non cerni. Forsitan quæras pro tua sollicitudine et vigilantia diligentiaque vitali, quæ fuerit illa quæstio in qua tropeum nobis Dominus de falso Israelita donavit. Referam nec tacebo, quoniam his rebus paginam tibi amas extendi.
that both we may glory in a twofold triumph through the Lord, and they may acknowledge that the understanding of divine things is established in the catholic faith, not in the wisdom of the world, the Lord admonishing: 'Unless you believe, you shall not understand' (Isa. 7): so that it may stand more manifest both that the obscure things of unbelief lie open to the faithful, and that even the plain things of the faith are not discerned by the unbelieving. Perhaps, out of your solicitude and vigilance and vital diligence, you may ask what that question was in which the Lord granted us a trophy over the false Israelite. I will relate it and not keep silence, since you love to have the page for you extended with these matters.
如此,我們既可在藉主而得的雙重凱旋中誇口,他們也可承認:對屬神之事的理解乃立於大公信仰之中,而非立於世俗的智慧,正如主所訓誨的:「你們若不信,就不能明白」(賽七章):好叫這事更明顯地確立——不信之人所看不透的隱晦之事,對信徒卻是敞開的;而信仰中連淺顯明白之事,不信的人也看不見。或許,出於你的關切、警醒與活潑的殷勤,你會問:主在其中賜給我們勝過那假以色列人之凱旋標記的,究竟是怎樣的辯難?我要述說,決不緘默,因為你喜愛我為你多寫些這類的篇幅。
284:85
Etsi enim non congrue necdum prioribus absolutis alia cæpta videantur interseri, tamen pro te malo aliqua etiam non suo ordine loqui, quam tuis mihi modo orationibus donata præterire. Quidam de inimicis crucis Christi, inter familiares Dei et quidem doctores, de scandalo illo gentis suae, quod in Dominum nostrum susceperunt, spiritu blasphemiæ Dominum pulsans protulit exempla de lege. Et ut quondam pater ejus homicida in pinna templi Dominum tentans, quid de ipso promissum esset in lege improbus prædicabat: ita hic, ne aut minus docte perfidiæ videretur, aut nudum pateret sine majori auctoritate mendacium: plura, ait, miracula propheta noster facit Eliseus, quam Dominus vester Christus.
For although it may seem unsuitable to interweave other matters before the earlier ones are yet concluded, nevertheless for your sake I prefer to say some things even out of their proper order rather than to pass over what has now been granted to me by your prayers. A certain one of the enemies of the cross of Christ—among the intimates of God and indeed among teachers—concerning that scandal of his nation which they took up against our Lord, striking at the Lord with a spirit of blasphemy, brought forth examples from the Law. And as once his father, a murderer, tempting the Lord upon the pinnacle of the temple, the impious one alleged what had been promised concerning Him in the Law: so this man, lest he seem either too unlearned in his perfidy, or lest his falsehood lie bare without greater authority, said: 'Our prophet Elisha works more miracles than your Lord Christ.'
因為雖然在先前的論題尚未了結之前就插入別的事看似不合宜,我卻寧願為你的緣故,甚至不按次序說些話,也不願略過如今藉你的禱告賜給我的。基督十字架的仇敵中有一人——竟廁身於神的親近者、且是教師之列——就他民族從前對我們主所懷的那樁絆倒之事,帶著褻瀆的靈攻擊主,從律法中舉出例證。正如從前他那兇手般的父親在殿頂上試探主,那不敬虔者引述律法中論到祂的應許:這人也是如此,唯恐在他的背信中顯得太過無學,或唯恐他的謊言赤裸裸地缺乏更大的權威支撐,便說:「我們的先知以利沙所行的神蹟,比你們的主基督更多。」
284:86
Nam cum pro magno Lazarum in lucem revocatum esse (Joan. XI) referatis, quid amplius dicere poteritis quam a vivo mortuum resuscitatum Profero quod verum esse etiam vestra confessione censetnr. Eliseus (II Reg. XIII) enim noster jam mortuus, appositis ossibus ejus mortuum quem juxta corpus ejus piratarum fugiens adventum, supremi officii deserens munus turba projecerat) exanimis animavit, et de frigidis ossibus atque exsangui corpore alienis cadaver vitali calore perfudit, nec quod habuit dedit; sed alii quod ipse tunc non habebat indulsit.
'For whereas you relate as a great thing that Lazarus was called back into the light (John 11), what more will you be able to say than that a dead man was raised by one living? I bring forward what by your own confession also is reckoned to be true. For our Elisha (2 Kings 13), when already dead, restored to life a dead man laid beside his bones—a man whom the throng, fleeing the coming of pirates and abandoning the duty of the last office, had cast down beside his body; and, though himself lifeless, he gave life, and from cold bones and a bloodless body he poured vital warmth into a corpse that was not his own; nor did he give what he had, but he bestowed upon another what he himself then did not have.'
「因為你們把拉撒路被召回光中(約十一章)當作大事來述說,你們還能說出比『死人被活人所復活』更大的事嗎?我要舉出連你們自己也承認為真的事。因為我們的以利沙(王下十三章),在他已死之後,使一個放在他骸骨旁的死人復活了——那死人是逃避海盜來襲、拋下最後喪禮之職的一群人,倉皇擲在他身旁的;以利沙雖自己已無氣息,卻賜下生命,從冰冷的骸骨和無血的身軀,把生命的暖氣注入一具本不屬他的屍身;他所給的並非他所擁有的,反倒把他自己當時所沒有的,賜給了別人。」
284:87
Hoc credo vobis majus caeteris virtutibus videatur, mortuum in auras vitales remissum esse per mortuum, et eo tempore quo ipso esset naturali lege constrictus, legem solvisse naturae. Hoc si præstat cunctis operationibus, cur hic potior non habeatur, quem tamen e prophetam et Dominum confitemur ? Aut si vel simile huic aliquid nostis, edicite, ut et honore præcellat, qui fuerit merito virtutis excellentior. Obstupuere ad haec dicta proceres nostri, et nullum referentes responsum, nec quod telum repercuterct producentes, pene sub inani adversarii machina inu. tilique ariete conciderunt:
'This, I believe, may seem to you greater than the other miracles: that a dead man was sent back into the airs of life through a dead man, and at the very time when he himself was bound by the natural law, he loosed the law of nature. If this excels all other works, why should not he be held the greater whom nevertheless we confess to be a prophet and a lord? Or if you know anything even similar to this, declare it, that he too may excel in honour who has been more excellent in the merit of miracle.' At these words our chief men were astounded, and, returning no answer, nor bringing forth any weapon with which to strike back, they well-nigh collapsed beneath the empty engine and useless battering-ram of the adversary:
「我想,這在你們看來或許比其他神蹟更大:一個死人藉著另一個死人被送回生命的氣息中,且正當他自己也被自然律所束縛之時,他竟解開了自然的律。若這事勝過一切作為,那麼我們既承認他為先知、為主,為何不當視他為更偉大的呢?或者,你們若知道有任何與此相似的事,就請說出來,好叫那在神蹟功德上更卓越者,也在尊榮上更超群。」聽了這些話,我們的首領們都驚愕失措,答不出一言,也拿不出任何武器回擊,幾乎在仇敵那空洞的攻城器械與無用的撞城槌之下潰敗了:
284:88
adeo ut ille, qui profuga omnium, ut aiunt, esse debuisset, etiam victoris gloriam sine certamine 140 reportaret. Quod ubi mihi est nuntiatum, ingemui tantam nobis inesse negligentiam, ut nec veritatem possimus astruere, cum alii valeant inculcare pro veritate mendacium; rogatoque Domino, quoniam nihil nostrum est, ut suis arma suggereret,f quo ejus ignaviæ auferretur opprobrium. Cedo mihi, inquam, istum magniloquium dicentem: labia nostra a nobis, quis noster Dominus est (Psal. XI)? Proferam profecto per eum qui disperdit linguam magoiloquam. ut intelligant domino famulum non aequandum, licet ipsi noverint Judæi prophetas veteres nulla miracula propriis edidisse virtutibus.
so much so that that man, who—as they say—ought to have been the fugitive of all, carried off even the victor's glory without a contest. When this was reported to me, I groaned that so great a negligence was in us, that we could not even establish the truth, while others were able to press home a falsehood in the place of truth; and, having besought the Lord, since nothing is our own, that He would furnish arms to His own, whereby the reproach of their cowardice might be taken away. 'Yield me,' I said, 'that boaster who says: Our lips are our own; who is Lord over us? (Ps. 12).' I will surely bring forth, through Him who destroys the boastful tongue, that they may understand that a servant is not to be equalled with his Lord—although the Jews themselves know that the ancient prophets performed no miracles by their own powers.
以致那人——按他們所說,本該是眾人中最當逃遁的——竟不經交戰便奪得了勝者的榮耀。這事報告給我時,我為我們裡面竟有如此大的疏懶而哀嘆:我們連真理都無法確立,別人卻能以謊言取代真理、深植人心;於是我懇求主,因為我們一無所有,求祂把兵器供給自己的人,好除去他們怯懦的羞辱。我說:「把那說『我們的嘴唇是我們自己的,誰能作我們的主呢?』(詩十二篇)的自誇者交給我。」我必藉那滅絕自誇之舌的主,使他們明白:僕人不可與他的主同列——縱然猶太人自己也知道,古時的先知並沒有憑自己的能力行過任何神蹟。
284:89
Denique ipse Eliseus (If Reg. II) cum spiritu magitri hæreditatus, velut insolentior donorum remuneratione venisset, Mandere tamen aquas, nisi sub Dei invocatione non potuit. bea fateor ipsius nanc quae proposita est interim fuisse virtutem, ut major aloria nostræ iidei sit, si tentationem etiam dum credimus opprimamus. Quid ais, Domini blasphemator? Eliseus, inquit, ipse mortuus alium mortuum contactu sui corporis suscitavit. Hoc loco plene, ut in omnibus Domino suo prophetæ virtus ansurgat, quae in Domino Jesu Christo, cum sepulcrum eius lapidibus infidelitas vestra muniret, lapidem milites obsederent, credo, ne resurrectio ejus idoneis testibus indigeret.
In fine, Elisha himself (2 Kings 2), when he had inherited a twofold portion of his master's spirit and had come, as it were more insolent, at the recompense of gifts, nevertheless could not part the waters except under the invocation of God. But I confess that this very miracle which has been set forth was for the meanwhile his own, so that there may be the greater glory of our faith, if we crush the temptation even while we believe. What do you say, blasphemer of the Lord? 'Elisha,' he says, 'himself dead, raised another dead man by the contact of his body.' In this passage—that in all things the prophet's power may rise up toward his Lord—that same power was present in the Lord Jesus Christ, when your unbelief was fortifying His sepulchre with stones, and soldiers were besieging the stone, in order, I believe, that His resurrection might not lack suitable witnesses.
總之,以利沙自己(王下二章),當他承受了他師傅之靈的雙倍分、彷彿因所得恩賜之報而更顯膽壯地前來時,仍非藉呼求神之名不能分開河水。但我承認,這被舉出的神蹟,暫且算作是他自己的,好使我們信仰的榮耀更大——如果我們在相信的同時也壓制住那試探。你怎麼說呢,褻瀆主的人?他說:「以利沙自己已死,卻藉他身體的觸碰使另一死人復活了。」在這一點上——好叫先知的能力在凡事上都向他的主歸升——那同一能力也在主耶穌基督裡:當你們的不信用石頭堅固祂的墳墓、兵丁圍守那石頭之時,我想,正是為使祂的復活不缺乏合適的見證人。
284:90
Nam resurrecturum, si volebatis oredere, noveratis; subito enim ille infernis terne cardinibus concussis, cum atupore militum et ruina saxoruip non alium aliquem, sese suscitavit in lucem. Elisei hæc propria dona, Ii fuissent, sibi dare maluisset; nec præstare alii poterat quo indigeret sibi. Denique hoc majus esse vestri etiam prodiderunt majores, dum Dominum in cruce deriderent, dicentes: Alios salvos fecit, scipsum salvum faciat; descendat de cruce, et credimus ei (Matth. XXVII). Vestrorum ergo sententia vincimus. Vestri promiserunt se credituros esse si præstitisset sibi quod aliis praestare consuevisset. Cur non creditis, quod esse præstantius non negatis.
For you knew, if you had been willing to believe, that He would rise again; for suddenly He, when the hinges of the nether world had been shaken, amid the stupefaction of the soldiers and the falling of the rocks, raised not some other man, but Himself, into the light. Had these been Elisha's own proper gifts, he would have preferred to give them to himself; nor could he bestow upon another that which he lacked for himself. In fine, that this is the greater, your own elders too declared, while they mocked the Lord upon the cross, saying: 'He saved others, let Him save Himself; let Him come down from the cross, and we will believe Him' (Matt. 27). By your own verdict, therefore, we conquer. Your own men promised that they would believe if He should bestow upon Himself what He had been accustomed to bestow upon others. Why do you not believe what you do not deny to be more excellent?
因為你們若肯相信,早已知道祂必復活;因為祂忽然間,當陰間的門樞被震動、兵丁驚駭、磐石崩裂之時,所復活進入光中的並非某個別人,而是祂自己。這些若真是以利沙自己固有的恩賜,他必寧願賜給自己;他也不能把自己所缺乏的賜給別人。總之,這事更為偉大,連你們自己的長輩也曾宣告過,當他們在十字架上譏誚主,說:「他救了別人,讓他救自己吧;讓他從十字架上下來,我們就信他」(太二十七章)。因此,我們是憑你們自己的判決而得勝。你們自己的人曾應許,若祂把慣常施給別人的施給自己,他們就要相信。你們既不否認這事更為卓越,為何不信呢?
284:91
Nemo certe hanc habuit potestatem. Denique et Dominus dic it de anima sua: Potestatem habeo ponendi eam, ei potestatem habeo resumendi eam (Joan. x). Recense superbas majorum tuorum imagines, et patriarcharum retexe virtutes, et invenies quis talem habuit potestatem. Quare non ei credam ut possit liberare animam meam, qui potuit et suam? Plura dicturo suggessit recordatio volumen crescere, et ideo cursum hujus quaestionis esse revocandum, quoniam adhuc prior illa astat in januis, cui aeque sua spatia, etsi babenis restrictioribus, tamen adhuc illibata debentur. Et vere non fuerunt neeessario in hac parte multa dicenda, ne et ille cresceret:
Certainly no one else had this power. In fine, the Lord too says of His own soul: 'I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it up again' (John 10). Review the proud images of your forefathers, and unfold again the mighty deeds of the patriarchs, and you will find who had such a power. Why should I not believe that He is able to deliver my soul, who was able to deliver His own also? As I was about to say more, the recollection suggested that the volume was growing, and that therefore the course of this question ought to be recalled, since that former question still stands at the doors, to which likewise its own space is owed—though with tighter reins, yet still untouched. And indeed there was no need for many things to be said in this part, lest that one too should grow:
確實沒有別人有過這樣的權柄。總之,主論到自己的性命也說:「我有權柄捨了它,也有權柄取回它」(約十章)。你去查考你祖先那些驕傲的圖像,展開列祖的偉業,你就會發現究竟誰曾有過這樣的權柄。那位連自己的性命都能救的,為何我不信祂能救我的性命呢?我正想再多說時,回想提醒我這卷冊正在增長,因而這辯題的進程當予收回,因為先前那論題仍立在門口,它也理當有它自己的篇幅——雖以更緊的韁繩約束,卻仍未曾觸及。實在說,在這一部分不必說太多,免得那論題也隨之膨脹:
284:92
si tamen magnum protulisse aliquid putaret se, quod quaereret prolixa disputatione victoriam, cujus non sapientiam, quae nulla in eo erat, sed superbiam, quæ abundat, infrelimus.. CAP. X.—Repudiato vero isto Israelita vel ne pugnam se fecisse gloriaretur (quandoquidem, quæ diximus instructionem nostrorum potius quam ad illorum certamen conflictumque protulimus, qui nec tunc vult credere cum vincitur), ne aut sanctum eanibus impudenter dedisse, aut margaritas porcis (Matth. VII) sparsisse judicemur, revertendum est illuc unde ad istum locum pene præcisis sensuum tramitibus deviavi; et oves domus Israel diligentius circumeundae sunt:
supposing, that is, that he thought he had brought forward something great, so as to seek victory by a prolix disputation—one whose wisdom (which was none in him) but whose pride (which abounds) we break. CHAP. X.—But this Israelite being rejected—lest he boast that he had made a fight of it (seeing that the things we have said we brought forward for the instruction of our own people rather than for a contest and conflict with those who will not believe even when they are conquered)—lest we be judged either to have shamelessly given what is holy to the dogs, or to have scattered pearls before swine (Matt. 7), we must return thither whence, by paths of sense almost cut off, I have wandered to this place; and the sheep of the house of Israel must be more diligently gone round:
也就是說,假使他自以為提出了什麼大不了的事,想以冗長的辯論博取勝利——但我們所要挫敗的,並非他的智慧(他裡面根本沒有),而是他那滿溢的驕傲。第十章——然而這以色列人既被駁回——免得他誇口說自己作了一場爭戰(因為我們所說的話,乃是為教導我們自己的人而提出,而非為與那些即使被駁倒也不肯信的人爭辯較量)——又免得我們被判為無恥地把聖物給了狗,或把珍珠丟在豬前(太七章)——我們就必須回到我幾乎沿著中斷的思路岔開到此處之前的原點;以色列家的羊也當更殷勤地被巡視:
284:93
quoniam si caritas Dei in nobis est, quis infirmatur et ego non infirmor ? quis scandalizatur et ego non uror (I Cor. XI)? Docendique magis sunt, ne usque ad blasphemias loquantur, si forte aut non teneant, aut non intelligant prophetata. Quærunt an divina virtus sit quae nuDe cœpit in martyribus apparere. 141 Cujus legis homines hoc requirunt ? nempe Christianæ, quæ sic est prophetationibus instructa, ut nihil tam novum, tam inopinatum nostris temporibus possit iugruere, quod fides non admiretur electior, aut a blaspbemetur infirmior. Omnia usque ad DomInum prophetæ veteres praedixerunt. Omnia post Dominum quae deerant, apostoli prophetarunt:
since, if the charity of God is in us, 'who is weak, and I am not weak? who is made to stumble, and I do not burn?' (2 Cor. 11). And they are rather to be taught, lest they proceed even to blasphemies, if perchance they either do not hold, or do not understand, the things prophesied. They ask whether that be a divine power which has now begun to appear in the martyrs. Men of what law require this? Surely of the Christian, which is so instructed with prophecies that nothing so new, so unexpected, can befall in our times, but that the more choice faith admires it, or the weaker blasphemes it. All things, up to the Lord, the ancient prophets foretold. All things after the Lord which were lacking, the apostles prophesied:
因為,若神的愛在我們裡面,「有誰軟弱,我不軟弱呢?有誰跌倒,我不焦急呢?」(林後十一章)。他們反倒該受教導,免得他們甚至墮入褻瀆,倘若他們或不持守、或不明白那些預言。他們追問,如今開始在殉道者身上顯現的,是否為屬神的能力。是哪一律法之下的人如此要求呢?無疑是基督信仰之下的人,這信仰滿有預言的教導,以致在我們這時代無論有何等新奇、何等意想不到之事臨到,那更精純的信仰都會欽羨,而較軟弱的則褻瀆。直到主為止的一切,古時的先知都預言了;主之後所缺的一切,使徒都預言了:
284:94
beato Paulo per libertatem sancti Spiritus non tacente, qui ait: Ex parte scimus et ex parte prophetamus (II Cor. XIII): non quod omnia,eiciat aut omnia non pro phetet in quo presertim loquitur Christus; sed ex parte de toto prophetat, et ex parte de toto scit. Prophetat nobis id quod scit illius temporis esse quod futurum erat. Quod vero prophetat, venturas utique prophetizat ætati. Prophetat autem totum, etsi prophetat ex parte. Hæc enim prophetat quorum apertione pars ejus temporis quæ usque ad finem superest indigebat. Ex parte ergo prophetat, quoniam jam ex parte fuerat prophetatum: et ideo propheta sciebat ventura quæ prophetabat.
blessed Paul, through the liberty of the Holy Spirit, not keeping silence, who says: 'We know in part, and we prophesy in part' (1 Cor. 13): not that he casts out all things, or does not prophesy all things—he in whom especially Christ speaks—but he prophesies of the whole in part, and knows of the whole in part. He prophesies to us that which he knows to belong to that time which was to come. But that which he prophesies, he assuredly prophesies to the age that is to come. Yet he prophesies the whole, even though he prophesies in part. For these things he prophesies, of whose disclosure that portion of the time which remains until the end had need. In part, therefore, he prophesies, since in part it had already been prophesied: and therefore the prophet knew the things to come which he was prophesying.
至福的保羅,藉聖神的自由,並不緘默,他說:「我們所知道的有限,所預言的也有限」(林前十三章):這並非說他把一切都棄置不顧,或不預言一切——他正是那位基督特別藉以說話的人——而是他就那全體作部分的預言,就那全體作部分的認識。他向我們預言他所知道屬於那將要來之時候的事。而他所預言的,確乎是向那將要來的世代預言的。然而他雖只作部分的預言,卻是預言那全體。因為他所預言的,正是那直到末了尚存留的時段所需要被揭示的部分。所以他只作部分的預言,因為部分已經被預言過了:因此先知知道他所預言的將來之事。
284:95
Cujus prophetiæ particulas plenitudo, ut ipse dixit, temporis abolevit, hoc medo: Cum venerit quod perfectum eat, quod ex parte est destruetur (Ibid.): scilicet cum in conclusione mundi, nec scientia major, nec prophetia ulterius sit quaerenda. Denique intelligentiae istius virtutem, ut apertius demonstraret, subjunxit: Videmus nunc per speculum in ænigmate; tunc autem faCie ad faciem (Ibid).
The particles of which prophecy the fullness of time, as he himself said, has abolished, in this manner: 'When that which is perfect shall have come, that which is in part shall be destroyed' (ibid.): namely, when, at the conclusion of the world, neither greater knowledge nor prophecy is any longer to be sought. In fine, that he might more openly demonstrate the power of that understanding, he added: 'We see now through a glass in an enigma; but then face to face' (ibid.).
正如他自己所說,時候的圓滿已用這樣的方式廢去了那預言的零碎部分:「那完全的來到,這有限的就要被廢去」(同上):也就是說,當世界終結之時,就不再需要尋求更大的知識或預言了。總之,為要更明白地彰顯那理解的能力,他又加上說:「我們如今彷彿對著鏡子在謎中觀看,到那時就要面對面了」(同上)。
284:96
Per figuram interim sunt universa, et quibusdam imaginum lineis obumbrata, ut infirmitas carnis nostrae terrenaque substantia magis se ad spiritualium extenderet veritatem, ut ea illi desiderium pulchritudinis suæ etiam h per speculum tenuiter offensa faceret, quantaque Ipsa esset in sua substantia nos doceret, cum tam admirabilis etiam in repercussis luce sua ænigmatibus appareret: et ideo non per speculum pollicita conspicimus, non tamen propter virtutum merita possidemus: et obscura adhuc luce miramur, non tradita tenemus. Tune vero prophetia scientiaque cessabunt, cum in ipsam promissionum omnium virtutem quæ promittebatur erit ingressus.
For the meanwhile all things are through a figure, and overshadowed by certain outlines of images, so that the weakness of our flesh and our earthly substance might the more stretch itself toward the truth of spiritual things; so that the desire of its own beauty, even faintly encountered as through a glass, might do this for it, and might teach us how great that beauty is in its own substance, when it appears so admirable even in its reflected enigmas by its own light: and therefore we behold the things promised not through the glass, yet we do not possess them by the merits of our virtues; and while the light is still obscure we marvel, we do not hold them as delivered to us. But then indeed prophecy and knowledge shall cease, when there shall have been an entering into the very power of all the promises which was being promised.
因為目前萬物都是藉著表象,並被某些圖像的輪廓所掩蔽,好叫我們肉體的軟弱與屬地的本質,更能向屬靈事物的真理伸展;好叫那對它自身之美的渴慕——雖只如隔鏡般微弱地觸及——為它成就此事,並教導我們:那美在其本體中是何等偉大,因為連在它自身之光所反照的謎中,它就已顯得如此可歎服:因此我們並非藉著鏡子而是隔著鏡子仰望所應許之物,然而我們並非憑自己德行的功績而擁有它們;當光仍隱晦時,我們讚歎,卻不能如已交付於我們般持守它們。但到那時,預言與知識就要止息,那時便進入了那被應許之一切應許的能力本身。
284:97
Hinc etiam prophetia semper obscura est, quod alio tempore canitur, alio cernitur. Quod dicitur dum non videtur, quasi non prædictum non cre ditur. Denique Isaias cum redemptionem nostram tanto ante in Virginis utero meruisset agnoscere, eamque velut jam praesentem populo demonstraret, dicens: Ecce virgo concipiet et pariet filium, et vocabitur nomen ejus Emmanuel (Isai. VII); præsentem et futuram infidelium Israelitarum turbavit ætatem. Nam et illi veteres prophetam suum, quoniam non viderent c quae ostendit, interemerunt; et hi prophetatum sibi, d quoniam prophetiam non receperunt, occiderunt.
Hence too prophecy is always obscure, because it is chanted at one time and discerned at another. That which is spoken while it is not yet seen is, as if it had not been foretold, not believed. In fine, Isaiah, when so long beforehand he had merited to recognize our redemption in the Virgin's womb, and was showing it to the people as if already present, saying: 'Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and his name shall be called Emmanuel' (Isa. 7); he troubled both the present and the future age of the unbelieving Israelites. For those men of old slew their own prophet, because they did not see the things which he pointed out; and these men slew Him who was prophesied to them, because they did not receive the prophecy.
因此,預言也總是隱晦的,因為它在一個時候被歌頌,卻在另一個時候被看清。凡在尚未被看見時所說的,便如同未曾被預言般不被相信。總之,以撒亞先知,當他在如此久遠之前就配得認出我們在童貞女腹中的救贖,並將它如同已然臨在般指給百姓看,說:「看哪,必有童貞女懷孕生子,人要稱他的名為以馬內利」(賽七章);他使當時與後來不信的以色列世代都不安。因為古時那些人殺了他們自己的先知,因他們沒有看見先知所指明的;而這些人殺了那向他們所預言的一位,因他們沒有領受那預言。
284:98
Quod ne nobis etiam adcidat praecavendum est, si eos quos prior aetas insecuta est, nostra blasphemet. Et quoniam, ut diximus, quod praedictum fuerat venit, venturum nihil est quod non fuerit ante prædictum, Domino ipso sic dicente: Ecce prædixi vobis omnia (Marc. XIII). Videamus potius si hæc aliquando majorum auribus probantur infusa, quæ modo nostris oculis tanquam impleta finguntur. Videamus si hæc omnia operatur unus atque idem Spiritus (I Cor. xn). Si denique nec angelus de cælo evangelizet praeterquam evangelizatum est nobis: licet ipse, quae nunt virtutes Domini, per dæmonum tormenta testentur, quando Satanas 142 non dejiciat Satanam:
And that this may not befall us also is to be guarded against, if our age should blaspheme those whom a former age persecuted. And since, as we have said, that which had been foretold has come, there is nothing to come which was not foretold beforehand, the Lord Himself so saying: 'Behold, I have foretold you all things' (Mark 13). Let us rather see whether these things, which now are feigned before our eyes as though fulfilled, were at some time proved to be poured into the ears of our forefathers. Let us see whether one and the same Spirit works all these things (1 Cor. 12). Let us see, in fine, whether even an angel from heaven should evangelize otherwise than what has been evangelized to us: although the very powers of the Lord which now are, are attested through the torments of demons, since 'Satan does not cast out Satan':
我們也當謹防這事臨到自己,免得我們這世代褻瀆前一世代所逼迫的人。既然如我們所說,那預先被預言的已經來到,就沒有任何將來之事不是預先被預言的,正如主自己所說:「看哪,我凡事都預先告訴你們了」(可十三章)。我們倒要察看,如今在我們眼前被假想為已應驗的這些事,是否曾一度被證實灌入了我們祖先的耳中。我們要察看,是否同一位聖神運行這一切(林前十二章)。總之,我們要察看,即或有天上來的天使,是否會傳與那傳給我們的不同之福音:雖然主如今所行的能力,正藉眾鬼的痛苦被見證,因為「撒但不趕逐撒但」:
284:99
quia uniformitas nequitiæ indivisa naturaliter societate conflata, similitudinis accessione non detrimentum sui metuat, sed capiat augmentum. Nam et multos in unius formam ° legionis pravitatis spiritus, et iniquitatis viperinæ confœderatio conglobaverat; nec sibi oberat multitudo, quae, sicut acquirebat miseram sociata infirmitate virtutem, ita formidabat incurrere f divisa permissione inanis substantiae va. cuitatem. CAP. XI.- Sed hac parte interim argumentationis emissa, sicut proposuimus, ea quae in ecclesiis Domini sanctorumque cœmetetiis admiramur, credenda esse divinitus fieri, si prophetata fuerint, comprobemus.
because the uniformity of wickedness, welded together by a fellowship naturally undivided, does not fear detriment to itself by the accession of likeness, but takes increase. For the spirit of wickedness had massed together many into the form of one legion, and the confederacy of viperous iniquity; nor did the multitude harm it, which, just as it acquired a wretched strength by an allied infirmity, so it dreaded to incur, when divided by permission, the emptiness of an empty substance. CHAP. XI.—But this part of the argumentation being for the meanwhile sent forth, let us, as we proposed, prove that those things which we admire in the churches of the Lord and in the cemeteries of the saints ought to be believed to be done divinely, if they have been prophesied.
因為邪惡的劃一性,由本性上不可分割的團契所熔鑄而成,並不因相似之物的加入而懼怕自身受虧損,反倒從中得增添。因為邪惡之靈已把許多聚攏成一「軍」的形狀,就是毒蛇般不義的聯盟;那眾多對它並無妨害,這眾多既藉聯合的軟弱獲得可憐的力量,也就懼怕在被允許分散時,陷入空洞本質的虛空。第十一章——然而這部分的論證暫且擱下,讓我們照所提議的來證明:我們在主的眾教會、在聖徒的墳場所欽羨的那些事,若曾被預言,就當信是出於神的作為。
284:100
Atque in hac tam dura difficilique materia, nec ab aliquo ante pertractata, Dominum consulere deberemus, si cessante merito repudiari non timeremus prae audacia: quoniam quæ ipsius sunt, nemo extra ipsum poterit explicare. Etenim mirum unde miseris tanta fIducia, onde est interpellandi Dominnm familiaritas tam amica, ut in hanc vocem audeamua crumpere: Osculetur me osculo oris sui (Canl. I). Quis tantum concepit optatum? Quis tam grandia voLa sui aestimator uegligens suspiravit, ut ipsius os cominus concupiscat attingere; atque vel utinam nos I eorum dignetur osculo, quos ipse dignatus est osculari:
And in this matter, so hard and difficult, and not before handled by anyone, we ought to consult the Lord, if only, when merit fails, we did not fear to be rejected on account of our audacity: since the things which are His, no one apart from Him will be able to explain. For it is a marvel whence there is such confidence for the wretched, whence there is a familiarity so friendly in appealing to the Lord, that we should dare to break forth into this utterance: 'Let him kiss me with the kiss of his mouth' (Cant. 1). Who has conceived so great a longing? Who, so negligent an estimator of his own so great vows, has sighed that he may desire to touch His mouth close at hand; and would that He might deem us worthy at least of the kiss of those whom He Himself has deigned to kiss:
在這如此艱難、且從未有人處理過的事上,我們本當求問主——只要我們不因功德虧缺、又因我們的膽大而懼怕被拒絕:因為屬祂的事,除祂以外無人能解明。因為這實在奇妙:可憐之人從何得如此的膽量,向主呼求何以有如此親切的親密,以致我們敢迸出這樣的話:「願他用口與我親嘴」(歌一章)。誰曾懷有這樣大的渴望?誰竟如此輕忽地估量自己這樣重大的心願,而歎息渴望就近觸及祂的口;但願祂至少肯以那些祂親自屈尊親吻之人的親吻來看我們為配得:
284:101
ut in secundis postremi tertiisque sistentes, de eorum labiis aliquam ex parte scientiam trahere mereamur, qui totam sapientiæ plenitudinem de Domini ipsius ore didicerunt. Quanquam, etsi magnorum meritorum privilegiis fulciremur, posita erant in exemplis, velut alta quædam repetita fundamina verecundiæ: ne quid indecens et mordinatæ praesumptio levitatis auderet. Quid tam electius beato Petro ? Quid ad spem erectius? Quid liberius in fide, quam oris sui osculo Dominus se osculaturum esse promisit, dicens: Tibi dabo claves regni cælorum; et illud: Super hanc petram ædificabo Ecclesiam meam (Matth. xvi).
that we, standing in the second and last and third places, may merit to draw some knowledge in part from their lips, who learned the whole fullness of wisdom from the mouth of the Lord Himself. And yet, even if we were upheld by the privileges of great merits, examples had been set before us, like certain deep-repeated foundations of modesty: lest presumption should dare anything unseemly and of disordered levity. What more choice than blessed Peter? What more uplifted unto hope? What more free in faith, to whom the Lord promised that He would kiss him with the kiss of His mouth, saying: 'To you I will give the keys of the kingdom of heaven'; and that other word: 'Upon this rock I will build my Church' (Matt. 16)?
好叫我們這站在第二、末後、第三位次上的人,配得從他們的唇上汲取部分的知識,就是那些從主自己口中學得全部智慧之圓滿的人。然而,即使我們有偉大功德的特權為依恃,仍有榜樣擺在我們面前,如同某些深深重述的謙遜之根基:免得妄自尊大敢作任何不合宜、混亂輕浮之事。有什麼比至福的伯多祿更精選的呢?有什麼比他更被高舉以致有望的呢?有什麼在信德上比他更自由的呢?主應許要用祂口中的親吻與他親嘴,說:「我要把天國的鑰匙給你」;又有那一句:「我要把我的教會建造在這磐石上」(太十六章)。
284:102
Tamen hic pondere se quodam pudoris incurvans, iiduciam quam elatior habebat ex merito, verecundior ad interroganda submittit, cum in coenaDomini non per se quis Dominum esset traditurus inquirit, humiliterque pudibundus osculum Domini ore petit alieno: quod illi, etsi apud Dominum fiducia erat, ut subinde etiam homiui inconcussa præsumeret, ut ibi, cum per maria gradientem Dominum audet poscere ut ipsum pariter, solidata sub vestigiis aquarum terga sustentent, aliquid sibi diffidentior, sed consultior nobis, quibus suo actu imitabiles formas tanquam in speculo collocabat. Si per legatum pr.cscientiam Domini cautus explorat, quid hac instructione dignius ?
Yet here, bowing himself down by a certain weight of modesty, the confidence which more loftily he had from merit he more modestly submits for the asking of questions, when at the Supper of the Lord he inquires not by himself who was to betray the Lord, and humbly, out of bashfulness, seeks the kiss of the Lord through another's mouth: which, although he had confidence with the Lord, so that thereupon he would even presume unshaken toward the man—as there, when he dares to ask that, as the Lord walks through the seas, the solidified backs of the waters may likewise sustain himself upon their footing—being somewhat more diffident for himself, but more provident for us, to whom by his own act he was setting forth imitable forms as if in a mirror. If through a delegate he cautiously explores the foreknowledge of the Lord, what is more worthy than this instruction?
然而在此,他因某種謙遜的重負而俯下自己,把他從功德而來、原本更高昂的信心,更謙卑地降下以便提問——當在主的晚餐上,他不親自詢問誰要出賣主,卻謙卑而羞怯地藉別人的口求主的親吻:這事雖然他向主是有信心的,以致他隨即甚至能對那人毫不動搖地放膽——如同在那裡,當主行走海面時,他敢求連凝固於水面下的水背也照樣托住他自己的腳——他對自己雖稍有不自信,對我們卻更有遠慮,因他藉自己的行為,如同在鏡中為我們陳設可供效法的樣式。他若藉一位代言者謹慎地探察主的預知,還有什麼比這教訓更可貴呢?
284:103
Quid hac consulendi arte subtilius, " quod nos facere debemus, quibus cum fiducia nullius sit meriti, debet esse saltem pudor exempli, imitantes vel in hac parte beatum Petrum, qui non solum qua humilitate, verum etiam per quæ ad desiderata pervenire possimus, ostendit. Ab illo absolutionem quæstionis bujus, quem ipse non erubuit interrogare, quæramus. Ab illo, inquam, qui in ipso Domini pectore, velut super arcam Novi Veterisque Testamenti recumbens; non modo ad vestibulum aliquorum divinorum oraculorum diligens inquisitor accessit, sed ipsum penetrale secretæ dispositionis tanquam familiaris sacerdos intravit;
What is more subtle than this art of consulting—which we ought to do, we for whom, since there is confidence of no merit, there ought at least to be the modesty of the example, imitating even in this part blessed Peter, who showed not only by what humility, but also through what means we may be able to arrive at the things desired? From him let us seek the resolution of this question, whom he himself was not ashamed to interrogate. From him, I say, who reclining upon the very breast of the Lord, as upon the ark of the New and the Old Testament, approached not only to the vestibule of certain divine oracles as a diligent inquirer, but entered the very inner sanctuary of the secret disposition as a familiar priest;
還有什麼比這求問的藝術更精微的呢?——這正是我們所當作的,因為我們既無功德可恃,就至少當有榜樣的謙遜,甚至在這一點上效法至福的伯多祿,他不僅指明我們當以何等的謙卑,也指明我們藉何等途徑能達到所渴慕之事。讓我們向他尋求這問題的解答,他自己都不以求問為恥。我說,就向那位倚靠在主胸膛上、如同倚靠在新約舊約之約櫃上的人尋求;他不僅如殷勤的探究者來到某些屬神神諭的門廊前,更如親近的祭司進入了那隱祕安排的至聖所本身;
284:104
et ideo solus vidit in principio Verbum, quando illi velut exterior sacrosancti 143 templi ara, sic interior metienda. committitur.ipse nos de eo libro quem septem signaculis clausum flevit, reseratumque lætatus est, non per aliquem pseudotypum, sed per patentes januas in suum pectus veritatis inducat. CAP. XII.-Atqui ne dum consulitur, immoremur, praevenit inquirentes etiam præscientiæ compendio: quod trepidum aliquando nostris mentibus futurum cernebat, illuminat. Reddit etiam velut percunctatus responsa de Patmos. De eo utique loco ubi cœlorum secreta, præclusa Caesari, non alienus intravit, et angelorum sacramenta pulsus ab hominum conversatione cognovit. Ait enim:
and therefore he alone saw in the beginning the Word, when to him, as it were, is committed the interior altar to be measured, just as the exterior altar of the most holy temple. May he lead us concerning that book which, closed with seven seals, he wept over and rejoiced to see unsealed, not through any false type, but through open doors, into his own breast of truth. CHAP. XII.—And moreover, lest we linger while he is being consulted, he anticipates the inquirers even by a compendium of foreknowledge: what he discerned would at some time be fearful to our minds, he illumines. He renders also, as if questioned, responses from Patmos. From that place, surely, where he, not as a stranger, entered the secrets of the heavens closed to Caesar, and, driven from the converse of men, came to know the mysteries of the angels. For he says:
因此,唯獨他在起初看見了「道」,那時彷彿把那內在的祭壇交給他去度量,正如那至聖之殿外在的祭壇一樣。願他就那卷書引領我們——那用七印封閉、他為之哭泣、又因見它被開啟而歡喜的書卷——不藉任何虛假的預表,而是藉敞開的門,領我們進入他自己那真理的胸懷。第十二章——再者,免得我們在求問他時遲延,他甚至以預知的捷徑先於發問者:他所看出將來某時要使我們心思恐懼的,他予以光照。他也彷彿被問及一般,從帕特摩島作出回答。無疑是從那地方——他並非以外人的身分,進入了對凱撒封閉的諸天奧祕,並且被逐出人間交往,得知了眾天使的奧祕。因為他說:
284:105
b Vidi sub ara Dei animas occisorum marturum propter verbum Dei et testimonium Jesu, quod habebant; et datæ sunt illis singulæ stolæ; et clamaverunt voce magna dicentes: Usquiquo, Domine, sanctus et verus non vindicas sanguinem nostrum ab his qui in terris habitant? Et datæ sunt eis singulæ stolæ albæ, et dictum est eis, ut requiescant adhuc parvo tempore, donec compleatur numerus conservorum et fratrum eorum qui occidentur postea exempto eorum (Apoc. VI) - c 0 Apocalypsim vere divinam a tanto apostolo merito confessionis tempore patefactam, ut magis ad tolerantiam durarentur, cum illi passorum merita monstrarentur!
'I saw under the altar of God the souls of the martyrs slain for the word of God and for the testimony of Jesus, which they held; and to them were given single robes; and they cried with a great voice, saying: How long, O Lord, holy and true, do you not avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth? And to them were given single white robes, and it was said to them, that they should rest yet a little time, until the number should be completed of their fellow-servants and of their brethren who are to be slain hereafter as they were' (Rev. 6). O Apocalypse truly divine, laid open by so great an apostle in the time of confession by merit, that they might the more be hardened unto endurance, when the merits of those who had suffered were shown to them!
「我看見在神的祭壇底下,有為神的道、並為所持守的耶穌見證而被殺之人的靈魂;有白衣賜給他們各人;他們大聲呼喊說:聖潔真實的主啊,你不審判住在地上的人、給我們伸流血的冤,要到幾時呢?於是有白衣賜給他們各人,又有話對他們說,還要安息片時,等著那將來像他們一樣被殺的同伴弟兄的數目湊滿了」(默六章)。哦,真正屬神的默示錄,是由如此偉大的使徒在因作見證而被囚的時候展開的,好使他們在看見受苦者的功德時,更被堅固以致能忍耐!
284:106
Non ergo errandum est d per folia sibyllarum, quarum ut paginae incerlis mundi malis spiritibus luctahantur, ita loca ventis hujus aeris turbabantur. Ecce evidentissime apostolus hoc quod habebat enucleat, et obscurissimæ quæstioni lumen infert. Senserat haec aliquando dicenda, quae nunc sinistrior lingua, tanquam oleo, mollitis arte sermonibus in audientium et suum jaculatur interitum. Et propterea vidi, inquit, sub ara Dei animas occisorum martyrum. De fide testis nullus ambigit: testimonium ventiletur, intelligentia responsi nutet, non dicentis auctoritas. CAP. XIII. — Ac primum istud est animadvertendum, quod animas occisorum martyrum apostolus testatur se vidisse:
One must not, therefore, go astray through the leaves of the sibyls, whose pages struggled with the uncertain evil spirits of the world, and whose places were troubled by the winds of this air. Behold, most evidently the apostle sets forth in detail what he possessed, and brings light to the most obscure question. He had perceived that these things would need to be said at some time, which now a more sinister tongue, as if with oil, with words softened by art, hurls forth unto the destruction of his hearers and of himself. And therefore, 'I saw,' he says, 'under the altar of God the souls of the martyrs slain.' Concerning the faith of the witness, no one is in doubt: let the testimony be sifted, let the understanding of the response waver, not the authority of the one who speaks. CHAP. XIII.—And first this is to be noted, that the apostle testifies that he saw the souls of the martyrs slain:
因此,人不可藉著西比拉的書葉走入歧途,那些書頁與世上飄忽不定的邪靈相搏,那些處所也被這空中的風攪擾。看哪,使徒極其明白地詳陳他所擁有的,並為那最隱晦的問題帶來光明。他早已察覺這些話有一天需要說出來,就是如今一條更陰險的舌頭,彷彿抹了油、用技巧軟化的言語所拋出、以致害了聽者和他自己的話。因此他說:「我看見在神的祭壇底下,有被殺之殉道者的靈魂。」論到見證人的可信,無人懷疑:讓那見證受篩驗,讓對答的理解有所游移,但不是說話者的權威。第十三章——首先當注意的是:使徒見證他看見的是被殺之殉道者的靈魂:
284:107
ne quis, cum de muneribus disputare coeperimus, post resurrectionem dicat tribuenda martyribus, quae adhuc animas docentur indulta; presertim cum istud astipuletur nobis quod de mora judicii conqueruntur, quam resurrecturus utique, non qui jam resurrexit, accusat: quoniam aliud est poscere ut teneas, aliud jam tenere. Stolæ autem martyrum donantur exercitui, et tanquam tantae libertatis ingratus, magna Melum pulsat invidia de tarditate vindictæ: qui non levi pondere sermonis exprobrat dicendo: Quousque, Domine? hoc est dicere: quousque non vindicas quos statim vindicare debuisses? quousque, Domine? hoc est dicere: nunquid nos ultra finem differs sæculoruin?
lest anyone, when we shall have begun to dispute concerning the gifts, should say that they are to be bestowed upon the martyrs after the resurrection, which are shown to have been granted to the souls even now; especially since this stipulates in our favour, that they complain of the delay of the judgment—a judgment which surely one about to rise again accuses, not one who has already risen: since it is one thing to ask that you may hold, another to hold already. But the robes of the martyrs are given to the host, and, as though ungrateful for such great liberty, envy strikes at Melum with great envy concerning the tardiness of vengeance: one who, with no light weight of speech, reproaches by saying: 'How long, O Lord?' that is to say: how long do you not avenge those whom you ought straightway to have avenged? 'How long, O Lord?' that is to say: do you defer us beyond the end of the ages?
免得有人在我們開始論述這些恩賜時,說這些要在復活之後才賜給殉道者——其實這些如今就已顯明是賜給了他們的靈魂;尤其這一點對我們有利:他們抱怨審判遲延——這審判無疑是一位將要復活的人所控訴的,而非一位已經復活的人:因為求得以持守是一回事,已然持守又是另一回事。然而,白衣是賜給這一大群的,他們彷彿對如此大的自由不知感恩,帶著極大的切望為報仇的遲緩而發出強烈的呼求:他以毫不輕率的言語責問說:「主啊,要到幾時呢?」意即:你不審判那你本當立刻審判的人,要到幾時呢?「主啊,要到幾時呢?」意即:你竟要把我們延擱到諸世代的終結以外嗎?
284:108
Nam jam ad finem usque perventum est, et de nostra ultione non loqueris. Quod enim dicunt mirabiliter, subjungunt: non vindicas sanguinem nostrum ab his qui interris inhabitant ? Ergo non quousque, si adhuc illi mortales versantur in terris, qui Domini famulos fuste, lapide, ungula, flagris, plumbo, ferro, bestiis, igne sunt persecuti. Quousque enim imputatio est prolixioris aetatis, ut aut quousque sit sine line Sed adhuc persecutores morantur in carne, aut illi vita excesserunt, etiamsi in terris habitant, si quousque non fallit. Sed nihil falsum profertur testibus veritatis; et ideo magis interpretatio, non fides quaerenda est, quæ subobscura elocutione non excluditur, sed velatur.
For already it has been arrived at the very end, and of our vengeance you do not speak. For what they say wonderfully, they add: 'You do not avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?' Therefore it is not 'how long,' if those mortals are still lingering on the earth who persecuted the servants of the Lord with cudgel, stone, claw, scourge, lead, iron, beasts, fire. For 'how long' is the imputation of a more prolonged age—as to whether 'how long' is to be without end. But either the persecutors still tarry in the flesh, or they have departed from life, even if they dwell on the earth, provided 'how long' does not deceive. But nothing false is put forth by the witnesses of truth; and therefore an interpretation, not the faith, is rather to be sought, which by an obscure phrasing is not excluded, but veiled.
因為已經來到那盡頭,而你竟不提為我們伸冤的事。他們奇妙地所說的,又加上一句:「你不給我們向住在地上的人伸流血的冤麼?」所以,若那些用棍棒、石頭、鐵爪、鞭子、鉛塊、鐵器、野獸、烈火逼迫主僕人的必死之人,仍逗留在地上,這就不是「要到幾時」的問題了。因為「要到幾時」乃是指向更綿長時代的歸咎——即這「要到幾時」是否要無窮無盡。然而,或是逼迫者仍逗留在肉身中,或是他們已離世——即或他們仍住在地上——只要這「要到幾時」不欺哄人。但真理的見證人絕不吐出虛謊之言;因此當尋求的乃是解釋,而非其可信性,這可信性並未被那隱晦的措辭排除,只是被遮蔽了。
284:109
Cum ergo dicunt: quousque, Domine, sanctus et verus, non vindicas 144 sanguinem nostrum ab his qui in terris inhabitant, non eorum mortaliutu sanguinem mortesque desiderant qui in eos quondam aut populari seditione sævierunt, aut tribunalibus suffulti capilales sententias promulgarunt, quoniam in terris adhuc inhabitant, nec fas eSt ut accusentur defuncti, qui, dum viverent, sunt derensi his verbis; Ne statuas illis hoc peccatum; ignorant enim quid fa ciunt (Act. vu). Quod si inter passionum tormenta et amaros mortis labores tam pie quilibet pro injustis, pro impiis, pro cruentis, pro blasphemantibus supplicarunt;
When, therefore, they say: 'How long, O Lord, holy and true, do you not avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth,' they do not desire the mortal blood and deaths of those who once either raged against them in popular sedition, or, propped up by tribunals, promulgated capital sentences—since these still dwell on the earth, and it is not right that the dead be accused, who, while they lived, were defended by these words: 'Lay not this sin to their charge; for they know not what they do' (Acts 7). But if amid the torments of their passions and the bitter labours of death anyone so piously supplicated for the unjust, for the impious, for the bloodthirsty, for the blaspheming;
所以,當他們說:「聖潔真實的主啊,你不給我們向住在地上的人伸流血的冤,要到幾時呢?」他們並非渴求那些人的必死之血與死亡——就是那些從前或在民眾暴動中向他們發烈怒、或倚仗公堂頒布死刑判決的人——因為這些人仍住在地上,且不當控告已死之人,他們活著時已被這些話所辯護:「不要將這罪歸於他們,因為他們所作的,他們不曉得」(宗七章)。但若在受難的酷刑與死亡的苦楚中,竟有人如此虔誠地為不義者、為不敬虔者、為嗜血者、為褻瀆者代求;
284:110
si eo denique, tempore quo ipse angustiarum sensus extrema patientium poterat excitare ad maledictum, precatio pro hofnine fusa est, quis non intelligit non mentes martyhum, sed persecutorum personas fuisse notatas, eosque appeti quos in terris adhuc inhabitare credendum est illo tempore, quos quidem ignorantia non defendit, non eos qui in terris habitare jam per conditionem naturalis substantia desierunt, et olim ab ipsis martyribus sub ignoratione sunt excusati? Qui isti sunt non ignoramus. Spirituales sine dubio nequitiæ et tenebrarum potestas, quae et in terris adhuc inhabitant, et non cum ignorantia in Dei famulos peccaverunt. Nam cum ipsis Domino dixerint:
if, finally, at that very time when the very sense of anguish could rouse those in extremity of suffering to a curse, a prayer was poured out for man—who does not understand that not the minds of the martyrs, but the persons of the persecutors were marked out, and that those are being sought whom it must be believed still dwell on the earth at that time, whom indeed ignorance does not defend, not those who through the condition of their natural substance have already ceased to dwell on the earth, and were long since excused by the martyrs themselves under ignorance? Who these are, we are not ignorant. Undoubtedly the spiritual wickednesses and the power of darkness, who both still dwell on the earth, and have not sinned against the servants of God with ignorance. For when they have said to the Lord Himself:
最終,若在苦痛之感本可激動那些在極度受苦中的人發咒詛的那時刻,卻有禱告為人傾流而出——誰能不明白:被標記出來的並非殉道者的心,而是逼迫者的位分,並且所尋求的乃是那些必須相信在那時仍住在地上、且確實不因無知而得辯護的人,而非那些因其本質的自然狀況早已停止住在地上、且早已被殉道者自己以無知為由所寬宥的人呢?這些是誰,我們並非不知。無疑就是那屬靈的邪惡與黑暗的權勢,他們既仍住在地上,又非以無知得罪神的僕人。因為當他們對主自己說:
284:111
Quid venisti ante tempus torquere nos (Matth. VIII) ? Quomodo ejus famulos nescierunt, quos nec persecuti essent si ejus famulos ignorassent ? Ergo cum persecuti sunt, scierunt, quos per tormenta a Domino sUo detrahere conabantur. Ac inde cum beati martyres pro hominibus intercedunt, eosque ignorantiae excusatione defendunt, sequitur ut scientes teneantur in crimine, quique ipsas ignorantiæ tenebras hominibus suffuderunt, quorum furor etiam impietates excusat humanas: quos non alios dicere poterimus, quam qui etiam suis non amici sunt, dum eis non permittunt esse Quod bonum est: etiam Dei famuli inimici sunt, dum eos, quod bonum nesciunt, persequuntur. CAP.
'What have you come to torment us before the time?' (Matt. 8)—how did they not know His servants, whom they would not have persecuted if they had been ignorant of His servants? Therefore, when they persecuted them, they knew whom by torments they were trying to drag away from their Lord. And hence, when the blessed martyrs intercede for men, and defend them by the excuse of ignorance, it follows that those are held guilty who knowingly acted, and who poured out those very shadows of ignorance upon men, whose fury excuses even human impieties: whom we shall be able to call none other than those who are not friends even to their own, while they do not permit them to be that which is good: they are enemies even of the servants of God, while they persecute them because they do not know what is good. CHAP.
「你來這裡,時候還沒有到,就要叫我們受苦麼?」(太八章)——他們既非不認得主的僕人(若他們不認得,就不會逼迫他們),怎能說不知道呢?所以,當他們逼迫僕人時,他們是知道自己正藉酷刑要把誰從其主身邊拖走。因此,當至福的殉道者為人代求,並以無知為由為人辯護時,隨之可見:那明知故犯的乃被算為有罪,就是那把無知的陰影傾注在人身上的,其暴怒甚至寬宥了人類的種種不敬虔:這些我們只能稱之為那連對自己人也不友善的——因他們不容自己人成為那美善的;他們也是神僕人的仇敵——因他們逼迫僕人,只因不知何為美善。第……章
284:112
XIV.-Post harum sanctarum animarum querelam sequentia videamus: Et datæ sunt eis singulæ stolæ albæ. Quid hoc est, quod iterum vestiuntur? Nam prius, ut scriptum est, a Deo vestes sunt consecuti; a et nunc indumentis gemina libertate donantur. Quae utique vestimenta, cum spiritualia sint, non possumus vereri ne illa quae prius data sunt, extra videantar; nec sane querela generata est. Igitur, quoniam diversitas ipsorum et significatio vestium non sine mysterio est, Intelligere debemus donorum varietates et operationum divitias: quoniam subministrat unus atque idem spiritus. Accipiunt ergo vestes prius, ubi per confessionem corpora posuerunt: credo, ut vestiti non nudi invenirentur.
XIV.—After the complaint of these holy souls, let us see what follows: 'And to them were given single white robes.' What is this, that they are clothed again? For before, as it is written, they obtained garments from God; and now they are gifted with clothing by a twofold liberty. Which garments, since they are spiritual, we cannot fear that those which were first given should appear outwardly cast off; nor indeed has any complaint arisen. Therefore, since the diversity of these garments and their signification is not without mystery, we ought to understand the varieties of gifts and the riches of operations: since one and the same Spirit ministers them. They receive garments, then, first, where by confession they laid down their bodies: I believe, that they might be found clothed, not naked.
第十四章——在這些聖潔靈魂的抱怨之後,讓我們看接下來的話:「有白衣賜給他們各人。」這是怎麼回事,他們竟再度得穿衣?因為從前,如經上所記,他們已從神得了衣服;如今又蒙賜衣裳,得著雙重的自由。這些衣裳既是屬靈的,我們就不必擔心先前所賜的會在外面顯得被脫去;也確實沒有生出任何抱怨。因此,既然這些衣裳的多樣性與其象徵並非沒有奧祕,我們就當明白這是恩賜的種種與作為的豐盛:因為是同一位聖神供應它們。所以,他們先領受衣服,是在他們藉作見證捨去身體之處:我想,是為叫他們被發現時是穿了衣的,而非赤身的。
284:113
Rursus accipiunt alia vestimenta post interpellationem, imo post immutationem tam longæ patientiæ sustinentixque. Quæ utique cum accipiunt, quis non intelligit ut nova illos veste, ita virtute perfusos qua nunc emicant et apparent? Quod si aliud postulassent, aliud accepissent, ut dona respuerent, aut amplius quærerent irrisi. At cum non irridere illos Dei sit, quibus magna promisit, et hi post secundam munificentiam non querantur, dubitamusne ad consolationem querelarum ea speciem b pertinere, quæ vindictam postulantibus est donata ? At si ad consolationem, quæ major consolatio poterit inveniri hac potestate, quae dæmones, id est suos persequuntur inimicos?
Again they receive other garments after their appeal, nay, after the change of so long a patience and endurance. Which when they receive, who does not understand that, just as with a new robe, so with a virtue they are suffused, whereby now they shine forth and appear? But if they had asked for one thing and received another, so that they should spurn the gifts, or, mocked, should seek more. But since it is not God's to mock those to whom He has promised great things, and since these, after the second munificence, do not complain, do we doubt that to the consolation of their complaints there belongs that appearance which was given to those who were demanding vengeance? But if unto consolation, what greater consolation can be found than this power, which persecutes the demons, that is, their own enemies?
他們又在申訴之後,甚而在如此漫長的忍耐與堅忍之轉變之後,領受了別的衣裳。他們既領受了這些,誰能不明白:正如以新袍,他們也被一種能力所充溢,如今憑此發光顯現?但假使他們求的是一樣、所得的卻是另一樣,以致他們會鄙棄這恩賜,或被戲弄而求得更多。然而,神絕不會戲弄祂所應許大事的人,而這些人在第二次的厚賜之後也不抱怨,那麼我們還懷疑麼——賜給那些求報仇者的那顯現,是屬於對他們抱怨的安慰的?但若是為安慰,還有什麼安慰能大過這能力呢——就是那逼迫眾鬼、即他們自己仇敵的能力?
← prev partnext part →
← ch. 283
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284