📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 詩集與書信

維埃納的阿維圖斯

詩集與書信 第 162 章

拉丁文原文.4 節.部分字詞可點開查義

← 第 161 章第 163 章 →
162:1
Age nunc, in quantum potest fieri, videamus quae nostra quneve aliena sint. Ait Paulus apostolus: Nihil intulimus in hunc mundum, sed nec auferre possumus (I Tim. vi, 7). Et quid nostrum dici potest, quod non intulimus, quodque non relaturi sumus? Nudus, inquit Job, exivi de utero matris meæ, nudus revertar in terram (Job I, 21). Patet quam infidclis sit usus divitiarum, qui nos nec in principio nostro, nec in fine comitatur. Quid aurum et argentum avare multiplicas? quid luum dicis, ad quod nudus venisti? Mundi est facultas quam tuam, communis est quam propriam putas. Via itineris cujuscunque quam gradimur, breviter dici nostra potest, dum a nobis ambulatur:
來吧,就我們所能,讓我們思想哪些是我們自己的,哪些是別人的。使徒保羅說:「我們沒有帶甚麼到世上來,也不能帶甚麼去」(提前六 7)。有甚麼能稱為我們的呢,既是我們沒有帶來、又是我們不能帶回的?約伯說:「我赤身出於母胎,也必赤身歸回塵土」(伯一 21)。可見財富的享用是何等靠不住,它既不在我們的起初、也不在我們的結局陪伴我們。你為何貪婪地積聚金銀?你為何把你赤身而來的東西稱為你的?你以為自己所有的財富其實是世界的;你當作私產的其實是公用的。我們所行的無論甚麼旅程之路,只有在我們走著它的時候,才可簡略地稱為我們的:
Come now, so far as it can be done, let us consider what things are our own and what are another's. The apostle Paul says: 'We brought nothing into this world, and neither can we carry anything out' (1 Tim. vi, 7). And what can be called ours, which we did not bring in, and which we are not to carry back? 'Naked,' says Job, 'I came forth from my mother's womb, naked shall I return to the earth' (Job i, 21). It is plain how faithless is the use of riches, which accompanies us neither at our beginning nor at our end. Why do you covetously multiply gold and silver? Why do you call yours that to which you came naked? The world's is the wealth that you think your own; common is what you suppose to be your private possession. The road of whatever journey we tread can briefly be called ours, while it is walked upon by us:
162:2
nobis vero praetergressis, illorum est qui sequuntur. Quomodo potest nostra esse facultas caduca atque terrena, si non pascat egenum, cuM possit pascere violentum ? Quomodo nostrum cst, in quo nec capiendo innoxii, nec continendo justi, nec possidendo certi, nec conservando securi sumus? Et quam pro certo tenemus, nos nudos in terram venisse, tam certo sciamus, de terrestribus nos auferre nihil posse. Apostolus se recolit nihil intulisse, nihil ablaturum esse. Job fatetur nudum se natum, nudumque moriturum. Salomon omnibus parem clamat interitum et similem exitum. Quantumlibet ambitione velit quisque discerni, principio et fine conjungitur.
但我們一經過去,它就屬於那些跟隨的人了。這易朽而屬地的財富怎能是我們的,若它在能餵養強暴之人時卻不餵養貧乏之人?它怎是我們的,在其中我們取之既非無辜、守之既非公義、佔有之既無確據、保存之又不安穩?我們既如此確信自己赤身來到地上,就當同樣確信我們不能從屬地之物中帶走甚麼。使徒記得自己沒有帶進甚麼,也必不帶出甚麼。約伯承認自己赤身而生,也必赤身而死。所羅門宣告眾人的死亡都相同,他們的結局也一樣。無論人多麼願藉野心使自己顯得與眾不同,在他的起初與結局,他都與眾人一同了。
but once we have passed by, it belongs to those who follow. How can that perishable and earthly wealth be ours, if it does not feed the needy, when it can feed the violent? How is it ours, in which we are neither harmless in taking it, nor just in retaining it, nor sure in possessing it, nor secure in keeping it? And as certainly as we hold that we came naked into the earth, so certainly let us know that we can carry nothing away of earthly things. The Apostle recalls that he brought nothing in and will carry nothing out. Job confesses that he was born naked and will die naked. Solomon proclaims that death is equal for all and their departure alike. However much a man may wish to be distinguished by ambition, at his beginning and his end he is joined with the rest.
162:3
Nam quod dixit, Unus introitus omnibus ad vitam, et par egressus ad mortem (Sap. VII, 6), non incritorum æqualitatem, sed æqualem docuit condilionem. Unde si apparet, ut opinor, nec infida fidelium, nec peritura esse salvorum, quæ sint nostra paululum discernamus. Ecce, ut supra dixi, cum in hunc mundum veniente, nihil terrenae facultatis in. ferimus, animam tamen arbitrii compotem capacemque rationis, ad eligendum bonum, si Deus inspiraverit, exhibemus. Cumque processu temporis voluntatis nostrae qualitas confirmatur, Dei voluntas est ut bene faciamus, sed nostium est quod fecerimus. An forte dicit aliquis, et hanc ipsam boni actionem potest homo insidiante diabolo perdere.
因他所說的:「眾人進入生命有同一個入口,走向死亡有同樣的出口」(智七 6),所教的並非功勞相等,而是境況相同。因此,如我所想,若可見信徒之物並非不可靠、蒙救者之物並非要朽壞的,就讓我們稍稍分辨哪些是我們的。看哪,如我上文所說,我們來到這世界時,並未帶進任何屬地的實質;然而我們卻獻上一個靈魂,它是自己抉擇的主人、能夠運用理性,好在神感動之時選擇善。而當我們意志的品質隨時間確立時,我們行善是神的旨意,但我們所已行的卻是我們自己的。但或許有人說:連這行善的本身,人也能因魔鬼的暗算而失去。
For what he said, 'One entrance into life for all, and an equal exit unto death' (Wis. vii, 6), taught not an equality of merits, but an equal condition. Whence, if it appears, as I think, that the things of the faithful are not unfaithful, nor the things of the saved perishable, let us distinguish a little what things are ours. Behold, as I said above, when we come into this world, we bring in nothing of earthly substance; yet we do present a soul, master of its own choice and capable of reason, for choosing the good, if God shall inspire it. And when, in the course of time, the quality of our will is confirmed, it is God's will that we do well, but it is our own that we have done. But perhaps someone says: even this very doing of the good a man can lose through the plotting of the devil.
162:4
Verum est, quod amittere homo bonum proprium furante adversario potest. Sed hinc magis nostrum conjici debet, quia non violenter aufertur. Non enim taliter perdimus mercedem, qualiler facultatem. Quod enim extra nos est, carnalis inimicus rapiendo auferre potest: quod vero intra nos, non potest spiritualis nisi insidiando furari. Et ideo, ii sciret paterfamilias qua hora fur ienit, vigilaret utique, et non sineret perfodi domum suam (Luc. XII, 39). illa ergo est domus nostra, quae, si vigilamus, non potest dirui: illa vero prorsus aliena est, quæ potest vigilantibus nobis occupari.
誠然,人能在仇敵偷竊時失去自己的善。但由此反倒該推論它是我們的,因為它並非被強奪的。因為我們失去賞賜的方式,與失去財物的方式不同。因為在我們之外的,屬肉體的仇敵能藉搶奪奪去;但在我們之內的,屬靈的仇敵除藉暗算外,卻不能偷去。所以,「家主若知道賊甚麼時候來,就必儆醒,不容人挖透房屋」(路十二 39)。那麼,那才是我們的房屋,就是我們若儆醒便不能被拆毀的;而那全然是別人的,就是我們雖儆醒仍能被侵佔的。
It is true that a man can lose his own good when the adversary steals it. But from this it ought rather to be inferred that it is ours, because it is not taken away by force. For we do not lose our reward in the same way as our possessions. For what is outside us, the carnal enemy can take away by snatching; but what is within us, the spiritual enemy cannot filch except by plotting. And therefore, 'if the householder had known at what hour the thief would come, he would surely have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken through' (Luke xii, 39). That, then, is our house, which, if we watch, cannot be pulled down; but that is wholly another's, which can be seized while we watch.
← 第 161 章第 163 章 →
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196